HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - 1989/06/12CITY COUNCIL MEETING
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
4
JUNE 12, 1989
6:00 P.M. - JOINT MEETING WITH PARKS AND RECREATION
COMMISSION
7:00 P.M.
A G E N D A
1. Call to Order
2. Pledge of Allegiance
3. Roll Call - Wuori, Paone, Quick, Blanchard, Hankner
4. Approval of Minutes: May 22, 1989
Regular Meeting
(Received in 6-5-89 Packet)
June 1, 1989
Special Council Meeting Minutes
5. Public Hearings - 7:05 P.M.- Request of Dynamic Design-
ers for Wetland Alteration
Permit to Construct a Four-
plex in a Wetland Buffer
Zone at 7656/7660 Woodlawn
Drive
7:10 P.M.- Proposed Modification of
Development District No. 2
and the Proposed Modifica-
tion of Tax Increment
Financing District No. 1
and the Proposed Adoption
of the Modified Tax Incre-
ment Financing Plan and
Program Relating Thereto
7:15 P.M.- Request of Everest Develop-
. ment for Concept Plan and
Development State Plan
Approval and Wetland
Alteration Permit for
Mounds View Business Park
South, Planning Case No.
199-86
AGENDA
PAGE TWO
JUNE 12, 1989
U
7:20 P.M. - Renewal of On-Sale and
Sunday Sales Intoxicating
Liquor License for
Robert's Off 10
7:21 P.M. - Renewal of On-Sale and
Sunday Sales Intoxicating
Liquor License for
Donatelle's Supper Club
' 7:22 P.M. - Renewal of On-Sale and
Sunday Sales Intoxicating
Liquor License for Mermaid
Cocktail Lounge, Inc.
7:23 P.M. - Renewal of On-Sale and
Sunday Sales Intoxicating
Liquor License for Loose
Ends On 10
7:24 P.M. - Renewal of Off-Sale
Intoxicating Liquor
License for B and R Liquor
•
7:25 P.M. - Renewal of Off-Sale
Intoxicating Liquor
License for Budget Liquors
7:26 P.M. - Renewal of On-Sale Wine
License for Bel-Rae
Ballroom
6. Informational Meeting - 7:30 P.M. - Ardan Avenue
Drainage Report
7. Residents Requests and Comments From The Floor
--------------------------------------------------------
CITIZENS: BEFORE SPEAKING PLEASE GIVE YOUR FULL NAME
AND ADDRESS FOR THE MINUTES
--------------------------------------------------------
8. Approval of Consent Agenda
ITEM A. Approve Hiring of the Following Individuals for
the Wage Rates and Starting Dates Listed for a
Period Not to Exceed 66 Working Days
Bruce Pebble $5.50/Hr. June 13, 1989
Bruce Lindall $5.50/Hr. June 7, 1989
• Tim Hetlund $6.00/Hr. May 30, 1989
To be Funded Equally by Water and Sewer Funds
AGENDA
PAGE THREE
• JUNE 12, 1989
ITEM B. Approve Partial Payment #1 in the Amount of
$230,667.60 to Lametti & Sons for SYSCO Public
Improvements to be Charged to Tax Increment
Fund
ITEM C. Approve Purchase of Used Air Compressor from
Carlson Equipment Company in the Amount of
$5,095 to be Charged to Water, Sewer and Street
Capital Accounts Equally
ITEM D. Approve Purchase of Asphalt Roller from Aspen
Equipment Company in the Amount of $6,275 to be
Charged Equally to Water, Sewer and Street
Capital Accounts
ITEM E. Approve Purchase of Trailer from Aspen
Equipment Company in the Amount of $1,995 to be
Charged Equally to Water, Sewer and Street
• Capital Accounts
ITEM F. Authorize Mayor to Enter into Termination of
Construction Escrow Agreement for the Stanley
Fisher Addition
ITEM G. Set Public Hearing for 7:05 P.M., June 26, 1989
to Consider an Application for Wetland
Alteration Permit by Brian Daniels, 7280 Silver
Lake Road
ITEM H. Set Public Hearing for 7:10 P.M., June 26, 1989
to Consider Application for Wetland Alteration
Permit by Michael Read, 2208 Lois Drive
ITEM I. Adopt Resolution No. 2495 Approving Just and
Correct Claims Against City Funds
9. Consideration of Oakwood Park Improvement Plan
10. Consideration of Approval of Plans and Waive Building
Permit Fees for Silver View Park Picnic Shelter
11. Consideration of Resolution No. 2494 Authorizing the
City of Mounds View to Enter into an Agreement with
Texgas for a Propane Fueiling Equipment Upgrade
•
AGENDA
PAGE FOUR
• JUNE 12, 1989
•
12. Consideration of Resolution No. 2496 Authorizing the
City of Mounds View to Contract with Century Fence for
Fencing of the Public Works Shop Area
13. Approve Purchase of Used Truck for Parks Department
(Information to be provided Monday evening.)
14. First Reading of Ordinance No. 467 Amending the
Municipal Code of Mounds View By Amending Chapter 101
Entitled, "Non-Intoxicating Liquor"
15. Adopt Resolution No. 2491 Approving the Modification of
Development District No. 2 and the Development Program
Relating Thereto and Modifying Tax Increment .Financing
District No. 1 and Approving the Modified Tax Increment
Financing Plan Relating Thereto
16. Report of Attorney
17. Report of Staff Members
18. Report of Councilmembers: Wuori, Paone, Quick,
Blanchard, Hankner
• 19. Report of Administrator
20. Adjournment
•
CONSENT AGENDA
JUNE 12, 1989
The Consent Agenda is a technique designed to expedite
handling of routine and miscellaneous official business of
the City Council. The entire agenda may be adopted by the
Council in one motion. The motion for adoption is non-
debatable and must receive unanimous approval. By request
of any individual Councilmember, an item can be removed from
the Consent Agenda and placed upon the Regular Agenda for
debate.
ITEM A. Approve Hiring of the Following Individuals for
the Wage Rates and Starting Dates Listed for a
Period Not to Exceed 66 Working Days
Bruce Pebble $5.50/Hr. June 13, 1989
Bruce Lindall $5.50/Hr. June 7, 1989
Tim Hetlund $6.00/Hr. May 30, 1989
To be Funded Equally by Water and Sewer Funds
ITEM B. Approve Partial Payment #1 in the Amount of
$230,667.60 to Linetti & Sons for SYSCO Public
Improvements to be Charged to Tax Increment
• Fund
ITEM C. Approve Purchase of Used Air Compressor from
Carlson Equipment Company in the Amount of
$5,095 to be Charged to Water, Sewer and Street
Capital Accounts Equally
ITEM D. Approve Purchase of Asphalt Roller from Aspen
Equipment Company in the Amount of $6,275 to be
Charged Equally to Water, Sewer and Street
Capital Accounts
ITEM E. Approve Purchase of Trailer from Aspen
Equipment Company in the Amount of $1,995 to be
Charged Equally to Water, Sewer and Street
Capital Accounts
ITEM F. Authorize Mayor to Enter into Termination of
Construction Escrow Agreement for the Stanley
Fisher Addition
ITEM G. Set Public Hearing for 7:05 P.M., June 26, 1989
to Consider an Application for Wetland
Alteration Permit by Brian Daniels, 7280 Silver
Lake Road
• ITEM H. Set Public Hearing for 7:10 P.M., June 26, 1989
to Consider Application for Wetland Alteration
Permit by Michael Read, 2208 Lois Drive
ITEM I. Adopt Resolution No. 2495 Approving Just and
Correct Claims Against City Funds
DATE APPQO~~~~ ~'~z(y/84
4
PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA
Regular Meeting
June 12, 1989
Mounds View City Hall
2441 Hwy. 10, Mounds view, MN 55112
--------------------------------------------------------------=---------
The Mounds View City Council was called to order by
Mayor Hankner at 7:04 PM.
The Pledge of Allegiance was said.
MEMBERS-PRESENT: Councilmembers Wuori, Paone,
Quick and Mayor Hankner.
Councilmember Blanchard was noted as absent.
ALSO PRESENT: City Attorney Karney, Clerk/
Administrator Pauley and City Planner Hren.
Motion/Second: Paone/Wuori to approve the May 22,
1989 and June 1, 1989 minutes as presented.
4 ayes 0 nays
1. Call to
Order
2. Pledge of
Allegiance
3. Roll Call
4. Approval of
Minutes: May
22 and June 1,
1989
Motion Carried
Mayor Hankner closed the regular meeting and opened
the first public hearing at 7:08 PM.
City Planner Hren reviewed the request of the applicant
for a wetlands alteration permit, for the construction
of a 4 plea, with a 5 stall garage within the 100'
buffer of the wetland at 7656/7660 Woodlawn Drive.
She explained the ordinance does allow building within
the 100' buffer zone with a wetlands alteration
permit. Barr Engineering has reviewed this request
and determined it would not impact the wetland signi-
ficantly. The City Engineer recommended the drainage
plan be altered so it all goes toward the wetland, and
Barr concurs with that.
The site plan meets all the criteria of the ordinance,
other than falling within the 100' buffer zone. The
Planning Commission has reviewed the proposal and
recommends approval of the request.
5. Public Hearing:
Request of
Dynamic Design-
ers for Wetland
Alteration
Permit at
7656/7660
Woodlawn Drive
Public Works Director Minetor joined the meeting at
7:11 PM.
Mounds View City Council June 12. 1989
` regular Meeting Page two
Councilmember Wuori questioned how much surface area
would be impervious.
City Planner Hren explained 625 s.f. is required per
unit, or 2, 500 s. f . for this proposal, and 6, 200 s. f .
is actually provided. '
Kay Weisman, 7807 Bona Road, stated she realizes the
ordinance allows for putting buildings in the buffer
zone, but she feels the intent was to prevent that,
not allow it. She added she feels the buildings will
be too close and the residents will use the yard too
close to the wetland, .and they should not be allowed
to push the boundary back.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley explained additional fill
would be required, which they could not do. There is
presently a 3-5' drop-off there.
Mayor Hankner stated she was also concerned with the
wetland, as a great deal of debris has been dumped
there already. She added, however, that wetland
alteration permits have been given'in the past to
build in a wetland buffer zone.
• Councilmember Quick noted the aerial photo seems to
show the wetland was once much larger than it is
today. He questioned if pilings would be used and
if soil borings had been done.
Public Works Director Minetor replied he was not
aware of any soil borings, and he stated they would
have to indicate in their building plans what their
plans are for construction.
Mayor Hankner noted this is not the first time a
proposal has been presented for this piece of property,
and this is by far the most suitable plan to date,
and-the smallest.
Jim Cepress, owner of the property. stated soil borings
are on file with the City. He stated. they have a foot
and a half of soil, then sand all the way down. The
borings were taken about 4-6 years ago.
Debbie Alman. 2390 Pinewood Circle, recommended cutting
the five garage stalls to four. She also stated she
felt a single family home would be the smallest and
most suitable development of the property.
City Planner Hren explained the two lots were combined
into one some time ago. She added 10 parking stalls
are required by ordinance. with 5 to be garage and 5
to be outside. She explained the impervious surface
Mounds View City Council June 12, 1989
` Regular Meeting Page Three
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
remains the same, whether the area is a covered garage
or open parking stall. She added the property is
zoned R-3.
Mayor Hankner stated if they required a single family
home for that property, they would have to downzone the
property, which could involve litigation.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley added it was zoned R-3 prior
to 1980.
Councilmember Quick questioned whether the wetland has
the capability to handle additional run-off from this
development.
Public Works Director Minetor replied he believed it
did. The storm sewer leaving that wetland is slightly
under capacity, and the developer would be required
to pay storm water management charges, and he
explained the type of system that could be used.
Mayor Hankner explained what Chapter 509. is, which
requires the development of drainage. plans for each
district in the City.
• Ms. Alman questioned what type of precedent this
would be setting for future development in a buffer
zone.
Councilmember Quick replied he did not feel it would
set any precedent.. He noted that the chief author
of the wetlands ordinance was Mayor at the time the
first wetlands alteration permit was issued.
Mayor Hankner added they look at each development
individually to make sure everything is in order.
Mayor Hankner closed the public hearing. and reopened
the regular meeting at 7:31 PM.
Public Works Foreman Ulrich requested that the name 6. Approval of
of Bruce Lindall be removed from Item A of the con- Consent Agenda
sent agenda, and that he be allowed to interview and
select another individual for the position. He also
requested the name of the supplier be corrected to
Carlson Equipment Company in Item E.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley recozmnended the Council
approve the two remaining individuals under Item A
and approve the hiring of a third individual, but
that individual would have to be approved spec if ically
by the Council once they were selected.
Mounds View City Council June 12. 1989
Regular Meeting Page Four
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Motion/Second: Wuori/Quick to approve the consent
agenda, as corrected, and waive the reading of the
resolutions.
4 ayes 0 nays
There were no residents requests or comments fromi
the floor .
Mayor Hankner closed the regular meeting and opened
the next public hearing at 7:35 PM.
Clerk/Administrator Pauiey reviewed the proposed
modifications which related to the amendment to the
plan adopted for tax increment financing for the
Mounds View Business Park. Everest Development has
requested tax increment financing for Mounds View
Business Park South. The City has not approved that,
and this amendment would allow the City to negotiate
that item and does not represent approval. Pursuant
to State. law, the amendment must be made by June 30.
• Glenda Burrows, resident of the corner of O'Connell
Drive and Woodale, presented a petition to Mayor
Hankner, signed by residents of the area who are
against the extension of Woodale and the wetland
alteration permit.
Mayor Hankner accepted the petition and explained it
was appropriate for the next public hearing. She
stated there are already two other tax increment
financing projects in the City, Mounds View
Business Park North and Sysco. The Council has
taken the stance that they will not go beyond 15
years with tax increment financing on projects.
Bill Buckingham, 5220 Greenfield, asked for an expla-
nation of tax increment financing.
Clerk/Adminis rator Pauley explained what it is,
and stated that the theory is that without it,
development would not occur, and it is a method of
competing with other areas for development, which
ultimately will bring increased tax dollars into the
City, as well as other taxing jurisdictions.
Motion Carried
7. Residents
Requests and
Comments from
the F loor
8. Public Hearing:
Proposed Modi-
f ication of
Dvlpt. District
No. 2 and Proposes
Modification of
Tax Increment
Financing District
No. 1
Mr. Buckingham stated he felt the City was giving
up revenue in the short run, as well as the County
and School District.
Mounds View City Council June 12. 1989
~tegular Meeting Page Five
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
• Mayor Hankner further explained the tax increment
financing process.
Ms. Weisman asked if the Council really believed
Everest would not go ahead with the project without
tax increment financing, pointing out how successful
their Mounds View Business Park North project has
been.
Mayor Hankner explained that statistics have identified
tax increment financing as helping to attract Fortune
500 companies, which they feel is important vs. unstable companies.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley identified the Fortune 500
companies that have located within the City recently
and those who are expected to come in.
Bill Frits, 8072 Long Lake Road, asked for further
clarification of the tax increment financing concept,
as far as what portion goes to the City,. County and
School District, and what is done after the loans are
paid off.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley explained any surplus each
year can either be put into debt retirement or go to
• the taxing bodies.
Mayor Hankner closed the public hearing and reopened
the regular meeting at 7:59 PM.
Mayor Hankner closed the regular meeting and opened
the next public hearing at 7:59 PM.
Tim Nelson, of Everest Development, reviewed the
site plan for proposed Mounds View Business Park
South. It is a 17+ acre site, and he explained
its location within the City. The plan is for three
light industrial buildings, and he reviewed their
type of construction, the parking, landscaping and
traffic flow. The buildings will consist of
235,000 s.f. total. They propose to connect with
existing Woodale Drive on the south side of Highway
10, and they will also have access to the south to
County Road H.
Mr. Nelson reviewed the proposal for improvements
to the wetland area, which. is School District pro-
perty. He explained the School District will con-
tinue to own it. He also reviewed the drainage plan.
This has already been approved by the Rice Creek.
Watershed District, and will be presented to the
• School Board later this. month., for their approval of
the wetland area proposal. The wetland area is
approximately 14 acres in size and plans are to
include ponding, a nesting island and a trail system.
9. Public Hearing:
Request for
Everest Develop-
ment for Concept
Plan and Develop-
ment Stage Plan
Approval and Wet-
land Alteration
Permit for Mounds
View Business
Park South,
Planning-Case
No. 199-86
Mounds view City Council June 12, 1989
Regular Meeting. Page Six
The maximum depth. of the pond will be 5', with an
average depth of 3', with a 5 to 1 slope.
Mr. Nelson reviewed the findings of the traffic "
engineering report, and he also reviewed the pro-
posed plantings for the property. He also explain-
ed the PUD process, of which the first two steps
have been completed.
Mr. Nelson explained the two wetland alteration
permits they are requesting, and reviewed the
plans for public improvements.
Theresa Lexon, 5229 Jeffrey Drive, asked if the
buildings. would be two story.
Mr. Nelson explained they will be 24' high., which
would allow for 20' high warehouse areas, or office
space to be put on a second floor. They-will not
know what is required until leases are signed, but
they are anticipating 15°s of the project will be
office space. The buildings are light industrial,
and they will have an office building appearance
from the outside.
Ms. Lexon asked if there would be trucking in the
area, and whether they would go down Woodale Drive.
Mr. Nelson stated there would be, and the interior
circulation has been designed to keep the trucks
away from the parking and office space. The trucks
would have access onto Highway 10 or County Road H
and they do not believe they would use Woodale to
the west.
Gary Olson, no address given, asked why Woodale was
being upgraded.
Mr. Nelson replied it is to meet the requirements of
the City.
Mr. Olson stated he had been told by the City Engineer
that sign s cannot be posted prohibiting truck. traffic.
Mr. Minetor explained Woodale is a Minnesota State Aid
s reet, which must be constructed to State Aid standards
to continue receiving the aid, and they cannot prohibit
trucks from a State Aid street. He added it had been
one for several years..
Mayor Hankner explained the City is trying to use the
State gas tax money that is available, and the City is
subject to certain guidelines and requirements of the
State.
founds View City Council June 12, 1989
Regular Meeting Page Seven
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
• Mr. Olson stated they already have trucks and other
traffic in their area, looking for the business park.
on the north side, and they do-not want any more that
would come with development.
Mayor Hankner stated they had not received any phone
calls or any indication of concern about this issue
until the past week, even though it has been discussed
many times already.
Mary Paone, 5240 O'Connell Drive, asked why the road
extension is needed.
Mayor Hankner explained that in July 1980, as part of
the Comp Plan for the City, the extension of Woodale
Drive was. approved for implementation. with. any future
development in that area, for health and safety reasons.
She pointed out they had only received one complaint
about it as of last week, even though. it has been
discussed numerous times, going all the way back to
1980. She added she had gone back through City
records and prepared a listing which was available
to the residents, showing the numerous times this was
discussed, and she did not find any record of objection
to the extension of Woodale in any previous discussions.
. Norman Burrows, 5200 O'Connell Drive, stated he did not
know the road was proposed to go through.
Mayor Hankner explained an informational meeting was
held, articles appeared in the newspapers, and notice
was given, informing the residents of the meetings:.
She added the Council uses the Comp Plan and Zoning
Code to review developments, and is following the
guidelines of both. She pointed out this proposed
development has been on the Council agenda several
times, and the Council has been asking for comments:
and concerns up front, and has requested input from
the residents. She further pointed out the Planning
Commission reviewed the development using both. the
Comp Plan and Zoning Code.
William McCullough, 5269 Greenfield, asked why that
was adopted in 1980 when the houses have been there
for 20 years.
Mayor Hankner explained that in the 70's', the State
required cities to adopt a Comp Plan. She added she
was not personally involved in City government at that
time. She also pointed out th.e public hearing process
prior to adoption, and residents could. have voiced any
objections then.
Greg Flatten, 5229 0"Connell, asked why it took. this
proposed development to come along, if the City was.
concerned about the health. and safety in 1980.
Mounds View City Council June 12. 1989
' Regular Meeting Page Eight
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
• Tim White, 5249 Greenfield, stated he felt the road
would have truck traffic.
Mayor Hankner explained the City is required to
designate streets for State aid, and City Staff
goes out and assesses the need for repair of roads
in the City, and then designate those most in need
of repair or construction.
Mr. Minetor explained the. State requires compliance
with the State Aid system,-and he reviewed that
process. The City designated Woodale as a State
Aid street to allow for better access for the
residents.
Mayor Hankner also pointed out the property was
zoned as a result of the Comp Plan.
Mr. White stated h.e is pleased with. the effort th,e
City and Council is making to attract good businesses
but he is still very concerned about the extension
of the road, and questioned why they couldn`t use the
Perkins exit.
Mr. Nelson explained there is a 4' difference ,n
. elevation, as well as a one-way traffic flow for the.
north side of the project. Upon questioning, Mr.
Nelson stated they would agree to stopping Woodale
at the western edge. of their property, but they must
follow the direction of the City.
Mayor Hankner stated the Comp Plan was formally
adopted and the Council has to address the issue.
They are in the process of updating the Comp Plan
with the Planning Commission and will be holding
public hearings in the near future.
Ed Donatelle, 5269 Jeffrey Drive, asked if Woodale.
would be widened at th.e School District property,
pointing out it is already narrower than most roads
in the City.
Mr. Minetor stated the School District is willing to
give up the necessary area. The widening of the road
will not affect the ball fields or tennis courts.
John Ostlund, representing Independent School Di,stx.ict
#621, explained they have met with the developer and
reviewed the plan and they are. willing to give up the
easement access: to have a safety fence and a natural
berm, and .they axe willing to give up the, property on
the School Diatri:.ct side. He pointed out that add-
tional xoads axound the school, especially out to
Highway 10, w.,ll greatly enhance the transportation
flow... to .and ~ro~n the scli.ool . A recommendation will
be going to the School Board oii June 26.
founds View City Council
Regular Meeting
Mr. Ostlund stated the plan for the wetland area is
desirable to the School District, as it will enhance
that area. That will also be discussed by the
School Board on June 26.
Mr. Ostlund stated he had worked with the City on the
Pinewood area and road improvements, and he compl-
mented the City on the design of the improvements,
stating they were very pleased with what was done and
they now have a safer intersection in front of the
school than they had before.
Mr. Buckingham asked if Woodale would be used by
school buses if it is extended.
Mr. Ostlund replied it would be. He added the hill
in front of the school can be quite dangerous during
the winter and they would prefer to use another road
if possible.
Mr. Buckingham stated he lived in his home in 1980
and does. not recall any notices about the Comp Plan
or proposed extension of Woodale, and he asked if
the road could be downgraded now, and what the
difference in funds would be.
Mr. Minetor stated he did not know the exact dollar
amount at this time, as the funds are received as a
grand total and then allocated.
Mayor Hankner stated they could look at the possibility
of taking Woodale off the MSA inventory.
Mr. Minetor explained there are no notice requirements
for the designation of MSA streets.
Mayor Hankner stated it is the policy of the present
Council to notify people within 350' of a proposed
project, as well as have the item listed on
the agenda as frequently as possible, along with
coverage in the newspapers, but it is also up to the
residents to keep abreast of what is going on in the
City.
The resident of 5209 Greenfield asked who would pay
for the street extension.
Clerk./Administrator Pauley replied it would be out of
tax increment financing and the bonds, and not by the
property owners.
Mr. McCullough. asked if the sewer system would connect
with. the residential area.
June 121 1989
Paqe Nirie
------------------
Mounds View City Council June 12, 1989
Regular Meeting Page Ten
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mr. Minetor replied it would, and will flow through.
the project and out to the main on County Road H,
which will eliminate the need for the present lift
station. He added this project will significantly
alleviate problems the area is experiencing presently.
Wall Steiner, 5220 O'Connell Drive, stated they have
a nice residential area without much traffic, and he
would like to keep the businesses separate from the
residential area and he does not want to see the
road extended. He pointed out the letter he received
from the City of notification of the public hearing
did not refer to the extension of Woodale, and he felt
it should have been clearly stated.
Mayor Hankner stated it was not in the letter spe-
cifically as they would have to list every little
thing, as different items are important to different
people. She pointed out no one had raised the issue
at the time the notices were prepared and the Council
was not aytare:pf the sentiments of the residents. She
added the Council must live with the Comp Plan which was
adopted by a previous Council. She again pointed out
the numerous times the public has been informed of
the proposal and discussions that have occurred which.
• the residents could have participated in. She also
agreed that the Council needs to discuss this further.
Mr. Buckingham stated he had five concerns, the changes
proposed for the wetland, the potential traffic in-
crease, tax increment financing, he does not feel
warehouse use is desirable, and he questioned the
track record of Everest Development.
Mr. Flatten requested an explanation of what insignifi-
cant impact is for traffic, and requested a copy of the
report.
Mr. Nelson explained the study was done by Benshuff and
Associatds, as part of a year long environmental impact
study, in conjunction with Mounds View Business Park
North., then they updated the study for the proposed south
development. Mr. Nelson reviewed the statistics provided
in the study. He also stated they made a commitment to
the City and neighborhood to restrict truck traffic into
the residential area with the project to the north, and
there has not been a problem there. They will do whatever
is possible to restrict traffic to the west with this
proposed development, and they will also be managing the
property after it is developed.
Mayor Hankner stated this would be placed on the agenda
for the next agenda session, and the Council would direct
Staff to study the. Woodale extension issue and MSA, and
get all the required information together, and they will
also place it on the June 26 agenda for further discussion
and possible action.
Mounds View City Council
Regular Meeting
• Bill Franke, of Everest Development, stated they would
like to start the project as soon as possible, and the
extension of Woodale is not critical to them, and they
have only proposed it in conjunction with the City's
Comp Plan.
Al Plaisted, 5221 O'Connell Drive, stated he had heard
the developer say more than once that they don't need
the road, and he as a resident does not want it.
Mayor Hankner stated they .must look at the legalities.,
and they will hear the recommendation of the City
Attorney and Staff at the agenda session next week.
Ms. Weisman asked the Council to consider the road
extension would infringe on the wetland slightly.
Mr. Frits stated he did not feel there is a compelling
need to build a road just because the Comp Plan calls
for it.
Mr. Minetor stated that of the trees that would have
to be removed, many have died already, and they will
be looking at additional screening and plantings. He
added parking is recommended to go along the north
side of the road.
Ms. Lexon stated the road is dangerous already, with.
balls coming from the ball field and children playing
in the street.
Carol Olson, 5209 O'Connell Drive, asked why measure-
ments had already been taken.
Mr. Minetor explained survey work was required in order
for the impact to be assessed.
June 12, 1989
Page Eleven
Ms. Olson questioned how. long it would be before wildlife
would come back, after the wetland is dredged.
Dick. Koppey, of Westwood Professional Services, stated
it would take one to two years for vegetation and wildlife
to begin to return, but it may be sooner.
Mr. Flatten commented on the various types of wildlife he
has seen in the wetland and stated he did not feel they
would come back after development.
Jerry Linke stated he felt parking should be on the south,
side of the road, as the majority of the cars would belong
to people at the ball fields.
i Ms. Burrows stated the residents enjoy the wetland as a
natural habitat, .and no one else goes in there., and sh.e
does. not want to see the road extended and an increase in
traffic.
Mounds View City Council June 12, 1989
Regular Meeting Page Twelve
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
• Mr. White asked if Woodale did not go through, whether
it would prevent any other aspect of the project.
Mr. Nelson replied it would not.
Ms. Weisman expressed concern about the trail system
and pond for the wetland, and stated she would like to
hear an opinion from the Audition Society. She also
suggested a fund be established for maintenance of the
pond in the future.
Mayor Hankner pointed out it is School District property.
Ms. Alman asked if the Environmental Quality Task Force
has finished the wetland inventory.
Mr. Minetor replied they are still working on their
goals. and objectives, and they have not undertaken any
additional inventory of the wetlands.
Mr. Nelson reviewed the history of Everest Development.
Their principal owner has been in business since the
early 1970's, and he reviewed local projects they have
done. They presently manage 1.3 million s.f. of office
and warehouse space and are a $30 million per year
company.
• Ms. Lexon stated there were many young children in the
neighborhood, and she is concerned about her child
playing out on the road or going unsupervised to the
pond.
Mr. Nelson explained there is presently a 6-10' drop
along the property line, and while they will be putting
in a retaining wall, they will not be increasing the
drop.
Councilmember Quick pointed out there is more than enough.
water in the wetland now to drown an adult.
Mr. Flatten stated he felt this. was being slid under the
rug.
Mayor Hankner again stated notices were sent to the
residents.. Clerk/Administrator Pauley added tat they were
sent to the entire area, not just within the 350' guide-
line.
Mayor Hankner stated the Council has tried to hold infor-
mational meetings from the very beginning on this project,
as they did on the Sysco project, and the Council and
Planning Commission operated on the assumption that the
residents were paying attention, which they were not.
She added the Council will take all comments into considera-
tion over the next two weeks.
Mounds View City Council June 12, 19$9
Regular Meeting Page Thirteen
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alice Frits, 8472 Long Lake Road, invited all the
residents present to come back each 2nd and 4th Monday
of the month, to attend the Council meetings and be
informed.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley added the meetings are cable
cast and the agenda is broadcast from the Friday pre-
ceding the meeting. He also explained public notices
are listed according to State law, and they list the
street address whenever there is one.
Mayor Hankner closed the public hearing at 9:59 PM,
and the Council recessed for a short break.
The Council reconvened at 10:09 PM, and Mayor Hankner 10.
closed the regular meeting and opened the next public
hearing.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reviewed the process Staff
followed in preparation for the public hearings on the
liquor license renewals in the City. Each application
was required to be accompanied by a certificate of
insurance, inspections were done of on-sale establish-
ments for fire and health code compliance, a determina-
tion was made if any were in arrears on property taxes,
s assessments or utility bills, the Police activity
report was. reviewed, and inspections were conducted of
all on-sale licensees authorized for Sunday sales to
confirm compliance with City code.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported Robert's Off 10
is in arrears on the payment of utility billings in the
amount of $871.76, as of June 6, and a certificate of
insurance was not provided. A Sunday inspection has
not been done as they were closed the past Sunday, but
it has been reported they are not in compliance with.
the Sunday food safes. requirements. Another problem
exists in that Mr. Waste also has an interest in Loose
Ends on 10, and it is prohibited for any individual
to have an interest in more than one liquor establish-
ment in the City. Mr. Waste has encountered this pro-
blem before and has been reminded again and advised to
resolve the matter.
Attorney Karney advised the City stay with the ordi-
nance and convey that message to Mr. Waste.
Mayor Hankner closed the public hearing and reopened
the regular meeting at 10:14 PM.
Public Hearing:
Renewal of
Liquor License
for Robert's
Off 10
•
Mounds View City Council June 12, 1989
Regular Meeting Page Fourteen
Motion/Second: Quick./Paone that the on-sale and
Sunday sales. intoxicating liquor license be renewed
for Robext's Off 10, conditioned upon payment of
past due utility billings and receipt of a cer-
tificate of insurance, and upon receipt of proof
that Robert Waste's interest be placed with another
individual, with notification to the City by
June 30, 1989.
4 ayes 0 nays
Mr. Linke stated he did not feel it was fair to
allow only two weeks for Mr. Waste to accomplish that
and suggested additional time conditionally be given.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley replied the license
expires July 1, and Mr. Waste has known the require-
ments for a very long time.
Attorney Karney added the City would be in deep
trouble to allow a license to be renewed conditionally.
Mayor Hankner closed the regular meeting and opened
the next public hearing at 10:17 PM.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported the applicant
complied with. all code and statutory requirements,
and Staff recommends renewal of the license.
Mayor Hankner closed the public hearing and reopened
the regular meeting at 1Q:18 PM.
Motion/Second: Paone/Wuori to renew the on-sale
intoxicating liquor license and authorization for
Sunday sales for. Donatelle`s Supper Club.
4 ayes o nays
Mayor Hankner closed the regular meeting and opened
the next public hearing at 10:18 PM.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported the applicant
complies with. all code and statutory requirements.,
and Staff recommends. renewal of the license.
Mayor Hankner closed the public hearing and reopened
the regular meeting at 10:18 PM.
Motion/Second: Quick/Paone to renew the on-sale
intoxicating liquor license and authorization for
Sunday sales for the Mermaid Cocktail Lounge, Inc.
Motion Carried
11. Public Hearing:
Renewal of
Liquor License
for Donatelle's
Supper Club
Motion Carried
12. Public Hearing:
Renewal of
Liquor License
for Mermaid
Cocktail Lounge,
Inc.
4 ayes. 0 nays- Motion Carried
Mounds View City Council June 12, 1989
Regular Meeting Page Fifteen
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mayor Hankner closed the regular meeting and opened 13. Public Hearing:
the next public hearing at 10:19 PM. Renewal of
Liquor License
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported Loose Ends on 10 for Loose Ends
is currently in arrears on payment of utility bills on 10
in the amount of $2,041.28, and delinquent in pro-
perty taxes in the amount of $26,105.98 for 1988.
He reported he had received a call from the
applicant's attorney who advised him they had filed
for Chapter 11 bankruptcy last fall and stated that
being in arrears could not be a reason for not
granting the license.
A Sunday inspection has been done, and Ramsey County
will be doing another health inspection.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley recommended the renewal
of the license conditioned upon payment of past due
utility and property tax bills by June 30, unless
determined to be prevented by law by the City
Attorney.
Attorney Karney advised he and the applicant's
attorney had missed phone calls, and that he did
not know of the issue until this evening and he
• will have to research it and will have an answer
yet this week.
Steve Hauck, one of the owners, stated it was not
their idea to avoid paying taxes, but rather a
bankruptcy law, and they would like to have the
license granted contingent upon paying off the
property taxes on a time payment plan.
Attorney Karney advised only one law can take
precedence, and he recommended the City not grant
the license if the State law takes precedence over
the bankruptcy laws.
Mayor Hankner closed the public hearing and reopened
the regular meeting at 10:25 PM.
Motion/Second: Hankner/Quick to direct the City
Attorney to research Chapter 11 filing laws to see
whether Federal law takes precedence, i.e., back
property taxes and utility billings, and report
back to the Council.
4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
• Mayor Hankner closed the regular meetng and
the next public hearing at 10:26 PM.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported B and R
is in arrears on the payment of utility bil
in the amount of $224.22, and Ramsey County
opened 14. Public Hearing:
Renewal of
Liquor License
Liquor for B and R
lings Liquor
Property
Mounds View City .Council June 12, 1989
Regular Meeting Page Sixteen
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tax Department has reported property taxes are delin-
quent in the. amount of $4,410.55 for 1987 and $4,457.18
for 1988. He added that information contradicts the
information the City received for the 1988-89 license
and Mr. Waste has been advised of the situation. A
certificate of insurance was not provided with the
application and has not been submitted to the City
yet.
Mayor Hankner closed the public hearing and reopened
the regular meeting at 10:28 PM.
Motion/Second: Paone/Quick to approve the renewal
of the off-sale intoxicating liquor license for B and
R Liquor, conditioned upon payment of past due
property taxes and utility billings, and receipt of
the certificate of insurance, by June 30, 1989.
4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Mayor Hankner closed the regular meeting and opened 15. Public Hearing:
the next public hearing at 10:28 PM. Renewal of
Liquor License
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported the applicant for Budget
complies with all code and statutory requirements, Liquors
and Staff recommends renewal of the license.
Mayor Hankner closed the public hearing and reopened
the regular meeting at 10:28 PM.
Motion/Second: Quick/Paone to renew the off-sale
intoxicating liquor license for Budget Liquors.
4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Mayor Hankner closed the regular meeting and opened 16. Public Hearing:
the next public hearing at 10:29 PM. Renewal of Wine
License for
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported the certificate Bel-Rae
of insurance has not yet .been provided to the City. Ballroom
as well as a letter from the licencee indicating the
percentage of wine sales. He added Staff recommends
approval conditioned upon receipt of the certificate
of insurance and letter by June 30, 1989.
Mayor Hankner closed the public hearing and reopened
the regular meeting at 10:30 PM.
Motion/ Second: Paone/Hankner to approve the renewal
of the on-sale wine license for Bel-Rae Ballroom,
conditioned upon receipt of the certificate of
insurance and letter by June 30, 1989.
4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Mounds View City Council June 12, 1989
Regular Meeting Page Seventeen
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Park and Rec Director Saarion explained funds are 17.
being donated by the Lions Club for construction
of a picnic shelter at Silver View Park. Additional
funds will come from the Celebrate Minnesota program.
Mr. Linke reviewed the plans, stating they are very
preliminary. for a 34'x80' building, of concrete block.
He added the plans have not been approved by the.
general membership of the Lions yet.
Milo Gerdy, no address given, stated the Lions have
committed $75,000, and he understands the City will
bring sewer and water to the building, using funds
from Celebrate Minnesota. He added bids are higher
than anticipated for services, and are around
$25,000. One consideration his been putting up a
simple building and using the balance of the funds
for playground equipment. As the funds come from
gambling, the Lions are required to have them
encumbered by June 30.
Mayor Hankner reported the Council is involved in a
few different projects with the Park and Rec
Commission at this time, and they are working on
setting park maintenance standards. The Park and
Rec Commission meets again on June 22, and the
• Council will meet on June 26.
Councilmember Wuori stated there is a strong
desire from the neighborhood to see a play
structure, and she suggested building a smaller
structure and adding on later.
Mayor Hankner stated she would like the Park and Rec
Commission to review the proposal and get back to
the Council. She added the concerns of the neighbors
need to be addressed also. The Council will discuss
this further at the June 26 meeting.
Rocky Keehn, of Short, Elliott, Hendrickson, brought
the Council up to date on the Ardan Avenue drainage
report. He presented a map showing the location of
the Ardan Avenue and Edgewood drainge studies. He
reviewed the purpose of the study, and stated they
must insure the pipe size is correct for this area
and its problems in conjunction with the reconstruc-
tion of Long Lake Road scheduled for 1991.
Mr. Keehn reviewed what is currently in the area
and the plan that was determined to best meet the
. needs, and he reviewed phases of the project. The
total cost estimate is $688,000.
Consideration
of Approval of
Plans and
Waive Building
Permit Fees
for Silver View
Park Picnic
Shelter
18. Informational
Meeting:
Ardan Avenue
Drainage
Report
Mounds View City Council June 12, 1989
Regular Meeting Page Eighteen
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
• Ms. Frits questioned how drainage boundaries are
determined.
Mr. Keehn explained they are determined by the
City's topography maps and site visits.
Lisa Schladerbach, 2749 Ardan Avenue, asked how
long the project would take.
Mr. Keehn stated they have recommended it be done
at the same time as the street .improvements are
made, and they are focusing on the Long Lake
Road project in 1991, and the remainder would go
in as the road improvements occur.
Jim Schladerbach, 2749 Ardan Avenue, stated water
backs up in their yard with a heavy rain, and he
asked where the bottleneck is, and how the Long
Lake Road improvements would help his situation.
Mr. Keehn stated the Long Lake Road improvements
would not help his property.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley added the Ardan Avenue
project will alleviate Mr.Schladerbach's problem,
but they cannot do Ardan Avenue until the Long
• Lake Road project is complete. He added there is
a history of problems in that area and there have
been many discussions with the residents there.
Mayor Hankner stated that people who do not have
the problem with the water do not feel they should
be required to help. She stated that not only must
plans be formulated, but they must find financing
for the project.
Mr. Keehn stated the key is for the Council to
decide if this is the alternative they want to
pursue, and if so, they can then move on.
Motion/Second: Paone/Hankner to accept the Ardan
Avenue drainage report.
4 ayes 0 nays
Mr. Minetor explained the cost overrun on the study,
which is attributed to several things. Mr. Keehn
reviewed ways the cost could be reduced in future
studies.
Motion/Second: Hankner/Wuori to approve payment
. to Short. Elliott, Hendrickson in an amount not to
exceed $20.000 on the Ardan Avenue drainage report.
Motion Carried
4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Mounds View City Council June 12, 1989
Regular Meeting Page Nineteen
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ms. Saarion reviewed the proposed improvements for
Oakwood Park and their estimated costs. She stated
they plan to ask the residents around the park
their opinion of the planned improvements. The Park
and Rec Commission is proposing to fund the improve-
ments with a portion of the park dedication fee
from the Sysco project..
Mr. Linke questioned the proposed parking and planned
use of the field.
Ms. Saarion explained the plan would provide dual
use of the area, and she added it is in bad need of
grading.
Mayor Hankner reminded them they needed to keep the
wetland in mind in working with the park.
Motion/Second: Quick/Paone to approve Resolution
No. 2494, authorizing the City of .Mounds View to
enter into an agreement with Texgas for a propane
fueling equipment upgrade, and. waive the reading.
4 ayes 0 nays
• Mr. Ulrich explained the propane fueling equipment
upgrade and anticipated savings in doing it.
Motion/Second: QuickjPaone to approve Resolution
No. 2496 authorizing the City of Mounds View to
contract with Century Fence for fencing of the
public works shop area, and waive the reading.
4 ayes 0 nays
Mr. Minetor explained the fencing is needed for
security reasons around the propane tank.
Ms. Saarion reported they are still searching for
a used truck for the Parks department and do not
have a proposal at this time.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley explained the intent of
proposed Ordinance No. 467 and recommended the
first reading.
Motion/Second: Wuowri/Quick to have the first
• reading of Ordinance No. 467, amending the Munici-
pal Code of Mounds View by amending Chapter 101
entitled "Non-Intoxicating Liquor", and waive the
reading.
19. Consideration
of Oakwood
Park Improve-
ment Plan
20. Consideration
of Resolution
No. 2494
Motion Carried
21. Consideration
of Resolution
No. 2496
Motion Carried
22. Approve Purchase
of Used Truck
23. lst Reading of
Ordinance No.
467
4 ayes 0 nays. Motion Carried
Mounds View City Council June 12, 1989
Regular Meeting Page Twenty
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mayor Hankner explained this resolution was in
conjunction with the public hearing held earlier
in the evening.
Motion/Second: Quick/Paone to approve Resolution
No. 2491, approving the modification of Development
District No. 2 and the development program relating
thereto and modifying Tax Increment Financing
District No. 1 and approving the modified tax
increment financing plan relating thereto, and.
waive the reading.
4 ayes 0 nays
Mayor Hankner stressed that even though the Council
is adopting the resolution, they are not approving
the project or tax increment financing at this time.
Attorney Karney had no report.
Councilmember Wuori invited any interest parties
to a picnic reception tomorrow evening at City
.Hall park, in honor of Pat Erlandson, who is
• leaving her position of principal at Pinewood
Elementary School.
Motion/Second: Wuori/Quick to approve Resolution
No. 2497, a resolution of commendation and
appreciation to Pat Erlandson, and waive the
reading.
4 ayes 0 nays
Councilmember Paone had no report.
Councilmember Quickhad no report.
Mayor Hankner reported the Charter Commission met
last week and discussed student membership. They
believe they should not be a voting member or
be considered for the quorum, but they are welcome
to attend the meetings and join in the discussions.
She added the oath of office needs to be sent out.
They will be reviewing the charter.
Mayor Hankner directed Mr. Minetor to see that the
resident who had asked for the traffic study
• receive a copy.
There were no reports of staff members.
24. Adoption of
Resolution
No. 2491
Motion Carried
25. Report of
Attorney
26. Reports of
Councilmembers:
Councilmember
Wuori
Motion Carried
Councilmember
Paone
Councilmember
Quick
Mayor Hankner
27. Reports of
Staff Members
Mounds View City Council June 12, 198.9
' Regular Meeting Page Twenty-One
• The Council agreed to meet on June 29, beginning at 28. Report of
6:30 PM to review the management audit. Clerk/
Administrator
Clerk/Administrator Pauley explained a problem has
been discovered with the Kraus Anderson property
where Super America and Silver View Plaza are
located, in that while it was believed to be a PUD,
no record can be found that it was rezoned that way.
The zoning map shows it to be B-2, and a building
permit was issued for the construction of a curb
cut between the two facilities. A stop order has
been placed on the building permit while the issue
is looked into. All other PUD property in the City
is shown as PUD on the zoning map.
Attorney Karney has advised the curb cut cannot be
stopped, and the City should not try to rezone to a
PUD now, but rather go with what was provided for
in the resolution. and if that is inconsistent with
what is actually there, go with that. The project
was approved in 1982, and a preliminary search through
the files cannot find the actual rezoning.
Mayor Hankner stated she had been contacted earlier
• by Kraus Anderson concerning this matter. She
explained the situation as she understood it from
discussions with the deverloper.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley recommended they allow the
building permit for the curb cut, and the Council
direct Staff to prepare an ordinance to accomplish
the rezoning as quickly as possible.
Motion/Second: Paone/Hankner to allow the building
permit for the curb cut between Super America and
Silver View Plaza, and direct Staff to prepare a
resolution to accomplish the rezoning of the property
as quickly as possible.
4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
There being no further business before the Council, 29. Adjournment
Mayor Hankner adjourned the meeting at 11:55 PM.
Re ectfully submitted,
• ~ ~
Donal`c7 F. Pauley ~,>~~~~'
Clerk/Administrataor
• St. Paul Corp of Engineers
St. Paul, MN 55101-9808
Att: Regulatory $ranch
Dear Mr. Fell;
This letter is in regards to the letter we received concerning the
wetlands application permit CENCS-CO-R(89-842-12).
Our family has lived on the corner of O'Connell Dr. and Woodale for
twenty years. We enjoy our little piece of nature and quiet neighbor-
hood.
Through the years as the wetlands have matured it has become abundant
in wildlife. It has deer, fox, rabbits, pheasants, woodchucks, ducks
and many species of birds. To drastically alter the nature of the
wetlands as the propasal states would dramatically alter the chara-
cter and variety of wildlife that we enjoy. Having people replace
wildlife is not a change for the better. We have so little of true
• nature left.
We also feel there is little justification in the interpretive value
for the neighborhood or school as your letter states. The people who
most enjoy the wetlands now, want it to remain as is. As for the
school(when it was a school), they made very little use of the wetlands
for study in the twenty years we have lived here. The school now houses
a community center and is used mostly by senior citizens, group meetings
and special education classes.
Perhaps a less drastic approach could be considered as an alternative
to the dramatic change you propose. '
My family is also opposed to opening Woodale through to Highway 10.
Woodale serves only a threetblock area south of Edgewood Drive.
By making it a through road you will be bringing in non-residential,
traffic. The road would not serve Edgewood community center as they
have no access to Woodale. We have access to Highway 10 via County
• Road Hor H-2. Surely this proposed extension of Woodale could not
serve the developer as, an access road. If they need another access
road let them look to opening on County Road H.
.,
~n conclusion: let the developer build on the hill but do not let
them destroy the natural habitat and wildlife we enjoy. Let us keep our
quiet residential area safe and quiet by not bringing in increased
non-residential traffic.
Thank you for taking the time to read my version of what the proposed
change would do to us.
Sincerely,
•
Glenda Burrows
5200 O'Connell Drive
Mounds View, MN 55112
786-3493
June 1, 1989
•
~'.
..I..l°~ t~:-i...lt~i1'd4 :1:..1.. i'iFl`r' k~,t::ll~.ft~:~t~~ t~?t``.I:;
....,
1' 7 a. ]rS ... I:•:''" .:.: i I=- .l. iifi k". [... i=..::•:~ tr_i a .... 'k:::::'r 1"' iii. t::i c::l YYi .-'r1'k°. t:::1:::. i ;E:'t:::
t::i. t::: ri k: t... l':. I' 1 E:::
..
~ i'" i«? y::i t::? {:i-C? C:t t:?•: 't:. ei~: i...l ~> 7. i:3 i'? i::?.#. 1,xJ r i {::? t_I l::Y .i. {•' x.11='• :l. V e:? ,~ ~•~,i 1:.'
I°•
~. 1. ':~ e~: .I. r'i
Y" iii' ii :i. t:. tc.' i'l '.:::i. c!t .. r:a P" G:' -:'t 1 ._? I"' 't:: I"Y t::i' i Yi i::? ?iii ~~: i::? !ct P" 't:: :I. '}::. :i. iiii dil i:} t_t :i. E:i•?'k:: 1K t" ear LK
ea: i::: t:::' F± t_ ~~~ C.:i 1 'l:. I-i t.:~ _. r..: i i::: t•::i 1'" .._ i•;~'t: iw .~ t:. i"i {a 1'. ~.: <'t i•~: %Y i:? .I. f:~ G~ t:~ ;°f.'k:: t I"i F::' !"I i•;: t=° tYt <'~. a. ca
:;;~ r'i t::i [:? i,.. i:.` i::? t::? k:3 i`` .t:. Si'r:• i::? 1"i .' ~.:' ~, .... ,..,•.; ...:::. G..
.l. r ~~ t i t,. ~ 1-, t:: t :! i J t i i t i t::? 1"i h:. 7 i ec' rYi :i i I::? .. - .. ._
.I. <::t t:" e:a {:a ~.? c::t'(.. i'" i::? r'i r
•
~:: i" i c?. ~:: C:? t::: t:: %:Ft its 7. t ? r"7 ~:t .l. ~. `p% tt`a a?. I'l i".I C::' 1"' {::? r'1 ~". t ] G? l..t i"' S5'k:: I"' {c::' {i?'k:: Eiii ~~ .. .
I I'l {~~ ~,t p" {';11..? t:J i i F=' C:i
... .... •i r ... :Tii °. a .; ~~ ..
t:::''~~: • :. {•:::' i"'i :::i :1. {::? {...1 !^a t::? t. i..t. t:.l !::? t..'t ~ ~:. c~ t..! i::? .:::•'t:.:::..1..'7 't.::t. i::..i. ('ri C:'J 1"i t ?'k:. 4::t I'.. ~; ~ ...
I..l c~ t"' C i `.::: I'"i :L I•~ t::? r't
" ._ 1 ...
r° {...' .:.:,. C:~ ~;::,1"i 't:: ~-i ::a. any b~? E:;..... <::c ::::. i..) a. _.: t t.. i ! ? a, i°'7 {. e:, i_t P_ _? Eii1 •~il ! : G1 ti:, r'i {:~
~ :1"' a. f'1 t:. t.?.1..!. J. 't:. y
1 1 t~::, .: <a .i. {_t t::;' i:~~ i•• ~-:? t..t 1'° ~:, r° t::? I::? t:::'r°"l:: y' wa t::? ra t.1.:I. to r° 7•:;~ i::: t::' i:1 s:::~ ._. f i c:? t:? r'~ c•:;r ',v < i i-i't:: __-~~ 't:. t:.i
3.:i. ,~ E:::' t::; i'i c:? 1,.. l..i t•: ~ <~1 i•' <:~. i::? t..t ~~; •;~ i::>'t:: r' e:r t:~} i:: „
! F.., •a r.. i::, :.- ' ..;. i:: ...... i , i e•:~
.... t:. - ,..t ..1 t:•:. <.. r '
,.
...: t..t 1=' 1= ..., 7._7. ... {' ~ ,. r.? t. i
I (:::
::
1-' t
:
<:-t t::l <::> , {::t,..i c:i
i:
? <::t 1'
. _. ,
r
..
..
.
.
.
,
. .
_
1
t:} l..t iiii :i. f". ii5i s w `:; tci' iii: ~~ t-`a }"'1 ici? Y" {?F' 1. •:ei ~:. i"i c' .I.:f. 1..1 FM ~.:: t::? I"? h:' i:a I'_ C'~ t=` I i°i ~:' k..1 l.i. i=_ '::: iY1 i~ .~ ~.
i...l iiii' a. i::, h; ::? i..: r.. I_i i::? t::? t.:!
'- r :i. ?:: 't i"i ::t'`r e:::' i..:~ ,{;; r... t::? iYi "t:. h'i 4:~' i:::. r•:;? h'i :i. C:y I" 7 '~.1'..:'::i..~:.x::l. t::: c:t 1:.. r:i <::t s:::• 'k:: h i c:Y'f'.
._
~i t..i I"' I=" C:~ l_t I"t t:: t_!'.i[i ~ '• tii? t:::-t T! 4~7 ii?.:i. I•.: {;;) i"' I::? 1. i-
i:~' .i
1' 7 '`t : }"i c::' i'"' i::~ r:i t:~ ..
(": I'l a
i
i:a 1=.. t-;'r.l t::: r
:11..i
.
.
g .
.
.
1'" {_t l"t t ~? l.t' :: :i. 1"t '.:: °i t~:' .. Y" r: 1 h'i { ~? t.!.'k.: .;5. eii' :iil r"' t::? •3'• C:i #:~ :i. i"Y C:} Y" t..l t"i i:a `,•' ~:' P" ~~ F°Y t;
.i:: ~,;1:.. i:~a :L .i. C:i .L :I. '~' tci} 4`a r_.., i.'1 i:it'ti,•' ec' t:a t•:ii' i~^• i,.. ~~ C.:! l_t t::: h:: ':iii• ! (::! r.'•?. t:.'I t'::} Yii? ir' 4a I"] i.a 1:7 I") tic! i i ?ia. r't i'-t ~t:::?.7 r') i-) t~\7 ~.
a a. 'i:. L_7 ;:a r i..l ~.i r~ k" (...;1' t::i t..t i;,} I'? }•. L..7 r..:. r.. ei£' tra c: t_ i 1 r::' i:- {.;;? :_:• a. to t:: ~ r_~ .k:.:, trl a 1..{. r'; t::? t:. h:? t:~
',~ a. 63 6^a 1. 1" i (::I <il i'l i :i ~~ 6i't":E {::I i. 1"'i t: } 'k:. I"'t tr.' Eii L{' 4:i 1'l :I. fYi <:! .I. fiii :i. I"i [:! !.!. !"' ~ ? i ? t:: i•~: ''•y' cf P" is i < c.':11"i i:~ a. r'Y
i:: h'i {•:' •t~ a. t•"s• .i. i:a I::i iti" h'i :i. 1"i t::) 4_I. i::i
.. r• ...._ .. 1 ._ .. ..
.. ,•• (_ 17 c::' I°? t_i <.:::. a. r ~ e~' t:::. <.:=. I:.• <:a e° 1•~: r'Y e~ ~ {:::' t:.l iiii <a 1°+ {_? ~k°. h'i ;:~? r• ° <a c:: t<: c:' :~ :a !:;i t::? ; ~ 1=" ..
t::? rYi 'k: h ~ c-:• h 1 ~. 1. L
•
•
•
{:E l:.1 (.,.I l...l E~?{i 'E"i :I. L..I Ca i:: rl ki' E•"•E ki?P.. ffl a~f :1. {::E c„t l'l i~.. _ s c t.... _ .f: - ~....
1 I.1 kM 1,.. l::a ::i'k:. „ -_7 F:. ta. a` til ~'a rt ~,+' s r C..,ts t~? t.{• t,..
...:• .. ~ ... _ .. .. _ . .. _ t::i ..
i::) t..t :l. c::: ~ I' k:. ?::i :!. {..i k::: i...3 ~:::i. i:.t .E. .I. ~ :• ... {:"{ E.J t_t'::a' j% :::r 7. l'-~ {:: k::' ~':. E" i {•:
?:-. c:: l°i r.:, {:, :i. t;,~ ::~. ?::i r.:: I°Y t::t 1°i c;:} {:; r-1 i:: r. ~ i:: {, iii n'i t. ~. t°i :i. ~:: y i::: c:~ r.~ 'k: c=: r... w 4~J c~ {:1 c:} t`i c:a ~.: tea ~.~t ri t:
... .+ .{.. ...;. :L 1") t:i t_U'` L.i .. ~ .. ..., 'E°. E"i i~! 1"i tad {:k as : ... •
r.:+. l"i '',•• t'ti i~ ki'r't P" tit fi r 7. i::: {c:::i. C:{ E' ! E::i !,., l"' E"i {:a {:: i C:E - . , E. 1"' ;:~;: c64 i:a \~ C:: Ci I' i '~: Eii• 1"i C~
~ :€. ~::. I°i .. 1.-J r:; .t t•` c:, <v: ,. _, .. .. .;.:: __ ~-, -~. E...I :i. t~7 i ~ a~a ~~ r,..
t:~ ... i.. r.1:.. {::• t..t 1°i ci !:;a ci i ~ . f ~:: E°i {::. ~ ~ r•r {::: l::i. r..: i.: r° t-! •#~ + ~. !._
:!. {::J ,, 1. a::}t..tl`t'l:.'';~ {=aJ .. h`i ., t.~{::iLtl"'i'~::`ir I::ici ~ k-I'~~' ~ e'i
t:i r°~ {:i I~ ~ {:1 t:.~ k::J ~'a {::J {-J {1 ,. 1.~•J k:::• ,:: !:? r'i 'L'. {:, r'i i::! ~ r a. 'k:. I`i i'.: t'i r:;' t.t r. {:1 {; • ~> i. i'- t:l t3 :I. r 't: r•.. ~a f:.~.::i. c': c:; ~ ~ cl
. :._, ...
{'"+ a. {::j I"i 'E". {:::.E. {..! E :.'+ .+ .c:. .E. ii:!. t`" {:c{ k~i E::1 <='t i'" c~ i .+ C:: ici P"' 4'J e!'.`:ii E"i ~ k~ r' {: i C.:) b; ?i:i i::! I" f C.:E ~". f'1 ir? 4'' i:il 1'..:L {::) t..t z
,+ .., ..
+_ _... .. a_ c:
C:)'t.. { ~ !~' 1" E::i t_t ?iii 7. I'"i ti•? r:i `.:i kii'? i• C.i I"i .!. {J ., r {:) {°? }:! C:'r1I" i t..t iai Er'•~ C:i {:`! t :~ i::•t .E. k=' 1. ~a 1"i {::1 ~ i" i E7 {::: t::. `•ii• ..a c.•t t" 't%
.::! L.t i:: t-d i:~+t_t .E. t:a L.! {::•'r C:I iwJ?s'k, t"" C:i'v a. i._i i::j t,•,~ {`i <'=!'l". 1. ~s:; 1. k:•:'t ~ i:: !_! •i~• ~:-:! E:.i {-t;r! {:~ e.• •f~ t..t .I.
.. :_,
~,.. k::? s=• :t. t::E ki? i'7 "~:: 7. i:il ~. c:1. i'" t.:. <::1. „
. ..
r !..! 1. t 4 J i:! 1 ~ ' ". 't" t"i {:: k:~7 ?:ii' :: P.. f:: i ',~ {::1 t..t I'.. f_i i3't'E:: t..t Y` a~ .E. t='1:1..E. {::E .E. a. ~' ti:' E`i t~!. r:1 a. ~:. iM '~_ 'r:. E"i cit'~':. 4'J {•i.'.
....
r:•'t' ~ ..~ !::! pf kg, s E-i {ci't { ~' a. icl .E..E. 'V :. E"i {e3 {::{ t,.' k:~.' 1". a"! i..l C:E }::? E"1 C•"• et 4Fi ,•'it i"I E:: i=. ~ ~' i::? {_t LAi :I..{..E. ~:} k~ •'
E..
! Lt'E::'E". a. 1'l {•~J sift ~' :(. 1"i iil I"l i::: a. tiit .E. E"i r.'it t'"' C:{'.ii: E"i a. C:i C:i t'i t~.l .{..E. ~•1 E"1 {::i i.:i tfiJ I"i 1"' r:'. ?iii :I. {::f ki3l'l'i:: 7. ti'it ~.
.. ....
F•~! :: ~: E"'+ ]. ?i~ '~". a. fti ka !..! t_t I'" lct 1'" kW cis n 'E'. {'"1 CJ Lt {;~ }'! C'i k:4'r:11'` i""t k' c{t'yi '';! '~::. i'" tail-{' '~' 1. i::: i:A l"' (:i1 ii:F ?i :S. ?5i
...
.......
< ~ a - + .r _
,:w {:: 1.:E..~i. C:I k:•., r• 7. i'" <:! {~+ . k: f E.J kii' C'.: %?. L.l .~ i k::. i'l {::1 {:a I"i k::. !..: !..! ti i {:i) ::ii• t~E O v\~ f"i i"i +::. I" G::' t..i i"i .E..::' .~: *.a
.. - .. ... .+ .. i .
l::? t::i 1. t:'+t...~ {„1 1' i ~:•:~ r° t::i k.; F:~•!. ~ <::+. t_l G::. kii:' 'i:. E..i k ., r.. +:J <':! {::i i:a {::1(ii?::i i"i C:} {::{ { °+ i.: L.i r i:.J 4..t {:~ E"i ,. r-1 t"i <:a'l". t_t N` ~•:i
t°:! <.t .I. I ; ri {:~+ r=;"~; L.i C:i j:: C:: is ? ft? E::i i=i: i..it <i! i.: c i 'g CW+ i'.. .[:. I"1 f? I"t c'd. t"~ i:~ 53I"t a. i:3 iE'r:. E::) t.!.'i: ~_t E".: {::J fl 'l°. !`t e:?
+ .... r. r t:.: r^ .. .. ....
i,.' :r::' ?ci 7. {:: !::: f'i':.: y {::f'Y :' }"i a.... .. {Tl tat .{..I. L.1 tc' :4 '~:: E'l i::i !..! p- E..i {:::+ {::? t::E ..
~~
r~
u
June 2, 1989
We, the undersigned, are opposed to the Woodale extention
and the wet land enhancement proposal.
NAME ADDRESS IGNATURE
E~?C 6c~' 3 S~Dc~ ~ ,~ ,~
~~ ~~ ~
~~
r
•
~ ,
•
June 2, 1989
We, the undersigned, are opposed to the Woodale extention
and the wet land enhancement proposal.
~,/~
ADDRESS
S IGNAT~3$E
i
- ~ June 2, 1989
`.
We, the undersigned, are opposed to the Woodale extention
and the wet land enhancement proposal.
NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE
`~~~1
~C l . _.
-_ t
~, ~%Tl ~~! L1.
! (, ~ ~-') ~-!Z L~) 1°i
~?t ~`~
~70~t~t Z'~1N'~C{ ~"~-"'~
i ~•."~ .~~~r~;
, ~,, y~ in
l /~~~ F!/ ,
y ~ l
/y ~/~ ._
`' ,
,~ p~
~~ t.~`. 2.i`z //
-~~f*C
._ .
>.
.-
~' 1U 1,1 l ~ C t ~.tJC i ~ t ,. `~ ~t t ` L'- ~ ~' r y~~„L '~ J`-~"~,f ~1.~ /' t ~~1:
TT_ * ~
o• ~
.~ .~,
'~ ,t
~ /
y
~ ran rat S A'}'h rn~rv-~ ~".~ X ~ ~=~ r k~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~,n~. C:-Y
`4
'' June 2, 1989
We, the undersigned, are opposed to the Woodale eTxtention
and the wet land enhancement proposal.
•
•
- DA°~ ~"PP~oVf-0: ~~o
t , l~gc1-
PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA
Regular Meeting
June 26, 1989
Mounds View City Hall
2401 Hwy. 10, Mounds View, MN 55112
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Mounds View City Council was called
Mayor Hankner at 7:00 PM on Monday. Jun
The Pledge of Allegiance was said.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Councilmembers Wuori,
Quick, Blanchard and Mayor Hankner.
to order by 1. Call to
e 26, 1989. Order
2. Pledge of
Allegiance
Panne, 3. Roll Call
ALSO PRESENT: City Attorney Karney. Clerk/Admini-
strator Pauley and City Planner Hren.
It was noted Public Works Director Minetor was attend-
ing the School Board meeting and would be joining the
Council meeting later.
Motion/Second: Wuori/Quick to approve the June 12, 4. Approval of
1989 minutes as corrected. Minutes:
June 12, 1989
4 ayes 0 nays 1 abstention
Motion Carried
Councilmember Blanchard abstained from the vote as she
had not been present at the June 12 meeting.
There were no residents requests or comments from 5. Residents
the floor. Requests or
Comments from
the Floor
Clerk/Administrator Pauley read the items on the 6. Approval of
proposed consent agenda, with the exception of the Consent Agenda
licenses for renewal.
Motion/Second: Quick/Blanchard to approve the
consent agenda, as presented, and waive the reading
of the resolutions.
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Mounds View City Council June 26, 1989
Regular Meeting Page Two
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mayor Hankner noted the agenda session for July 3 had
been cancelled, and when the Council meets at their
next regular meeting on July 10, they will be address-
ing the items cold.
Mayor Hankner closed the regular meeting and opened 7. Public Hearing:
the first public hearing at 7:08 PM. Application for
Wetland Altera-
City Planner Hren explained the applicant has applied tion Permit,
for a building permit for construction of a garage on 7280 Silver
the side of the lot near the wetland. While the area Lake Road
in question is in the wetland according to the City's
map, a site inspection does not show it to be. Ms.
Hren explained how the maps are made from aerial
photos and how discrepancies can occur. She further
explained the location of the garage is not within the
wetland but is within the 100' buffer zone, which
requires a wetlands alteration permit. Ramsey County
Soil and Water Conservation District has determined
the area in question is not within the wetland, and
the City Engineer agrees.
Ms. Hren noted she had received a call from a neigh-
bor earlier in the day, concerned with the size of
the proposed garage and the lack of upkeep to the
. property. She noted, however, that the proposed
garage is within the size allowed by Code. Staff
recommends approval of the wetland alterations
permit.
Mayor Hankner stated that while she had not driven
past the property recently, she believed there had
been a good number of vehicles around.
Brian Daniels, owner of the property, stated he has
done a good deal of clean-up work since he bought
the property, and the cars are going and the garage
will actually improve the site.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley stated he could attest
to Mr. Daniel's efforts to clean the area up.
Mayor Hankner closed the public hearing and reopened
the regular meeting at 7:13 PM.
Motion/Second: Quick/Paone to adopt Resolution
No. 2504, approving the wetland alteration permit
for Brian Daniels, 7280 Silver Lake Road, Planning
Case No. 269-89, and waive the reading.
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Mounds View City Council June 26, 1989
Regular Meeting Page Three
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
. Mayor Hankner closed the regular meeting and opened 8. Public Hearing:
the second public hearing at 7:14 PM. Application
for Wetland
Ms. Hren explained the applicant has applied for a Alteration
wetland alteration permit to erect a fence around Permit for
his lot, which would be within the 100' buffer zone 2208 Lois Drive
of the wetland. The fence will be 4' and 6' in
height, but will not be within the wetland itself.
The City Engineer has reviewed the application and
recommends that, due to the topography and ditch,
the fence be constructed 3' back from the top of
the bank, to allow room for maintenance of the
ditch.
Michael Read, 2208 Lois Drive, owner of the pro-
perty, explained the fence will be chain link and
will be 6' in some sections to keep kids from
going over it. He agreed to move it 3' back, but
noted there were trees that would still be in that
area.
Mayor Hankner closed the public hearing and
reopened the regular meeting at 7:18 PM.
Motion/Second: Paone/Blanchard to approve Reso-
• lution No. 2505. for a wetland alteration permit
for Michael Read, 2208 Lois Drive, and waive the
reading.
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Mayor Hankner stated she had attended the Park 9. Discussion of
Commission meeting last week. It may be necessary Parks and
to set some special meetings to meet with the Park Public Works
Commission to review the standards for parks and Maintenance
public works. They need to review this and come to Standards
an agreement before much further work is done in the
parks.
Councilmember Quick .stated he was concerned about the
SYSCO property, as it had been determined not to do
a usage study of park land at this time, and he
recommended the Council look closely at doing the
study and budgeting for next year.
Mayor Hankner explained this had been
at the budget session, and is part of
plan, for 1991. She added she agrees
needs to be done, and they are in the
updating the Comp Plan, and they also
develop the park plan.
discussed
the five year
the study
process of
need to
Mounds View City Council June 26, 1989
Regular
------- Meeting
--------------------------------- Page
--------------------- Four
-------------
. Carol Golden, 7417 Parkview Drive, asked for an
explanation of the Comp Plan versus the park plan.
Mayor Hankner explained the two plans and their
differences.
Gary Jones, 7405 Parkview Drive, stated he had been
trying to get information on what is planned for
the park and asked what kind of documents exist and
how he could get copies. He added Silver View Park
does not appear to be covered in the master plan.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley explained that in 1980 the
City .was still negotiating with Kraus Anderson for
the development of that park area.
Park and Rec Director Saarion explained how the Park
and Rec Commission deals with Silver View Park
improvements.
Mr. Jones stated he would like budgets, overall
plans, drawings, and so forth for Silver View Park.
Mayor Hankner advised that Clerk/Administrator
Pauley and Ms. Saarion would be able to help provide
that documentation. She stated the documents to
look at would be the master plan, long term financial
plan and past budgets.
Dave Radermacher, 7421 Parkview Drive, stated there
was a master plan of the park when he bought his
home and he does not feel it is being followed. He
stated the plan looks good, but he does not like the
location of the proposed picnic shelter. He added
he feels the lack of adequate park maintenance is a
significant problem already. Mr. Radermacher stated
development of childrens activities seems to be a long
way off, but it is very important. He also pointed
out many trees have been damaged and need to be taken
care of .
Mayor Hankner stated she did not feel the bridge in
that area will become a reality, but a study for the
bridge has been put in the long term financial plan.
for 1990. She added the master plan does include the
picnic shelter. She also explained directions change
as Councils change and pointed out the government is
run by those who show up and voice their opinions.
na~~P MaPa ~f the Mounds View Lion's Club, explained they
have dedicated $75,000 to the City for the picnic
shelter, and Jerry Linke came back to them and asked
for another $20,000, which they have turned down.
Mr. Linke advised the Lions Club that the City does
Mounds View City Council June 26, 1989
Regular Meeting Page Five
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
• have the money necessary for the hook up of services to
the park shelter.
Mayor Hankner replied that is Mr. Linke's opinion, and
not necessarily the feeling of the Council or the City.
or fact. She suggested a Council member should attend
the Lions Club meeting and discuss the issue with
them.
Councilmember Paone and the representative of the Lions
Club disagreed on whether the $75,000 dedication was
for a picnic shelter exclusively or for other equip-
ment also.
Mike Delmarc, 7413 Parkview Drive, asked who is
liable for construction once the $75,000 is received.
Clerk /Administrator Pauley explained they can give
$75,000 as a cash gift or build the structure and
give it to the City.
Mr. Radermacher stated he feels the Lions .Club will
be setting public policy by giving this size gift,
and they should look at how this fits into the overall
plan. He added he would like to meet with the Lions
Club to discuss concerns first hand.
Mr. Jones added he would like to see a public meeting
of the Lions Club with the City Council.
Mayor Hankner agreed and stated a time would be set,
and she directed Ms. Saarion to coordinate schedules
and get a meeting arranged. The Council will formally
set the time at their July 10 meeting.
Ms. Hren explained the proposed ordinance is the
result of a subdivision and the resulting need to
clarify addresses.
Motion/Second: Quick/Blanchard to have the first
reading of Ordinance No. 469, amending the Municipal
Code of Mounds View by amending Chapter 47, entitled
"House and Building Numbers", and waive the reading.
5 ayes 0 nays
Clerk/Administrator Pauley explained the intent of
the proposed ordinance is to amend Chapter 104 to
. allow composting in peoples yards, following the
guidelines listed in the ordinance.
I0. First Reading
of Ordinance
No. 469
Motion Carried
11. First Reading
of Ordinance
No. 468
Mounds View City Council June 26, 1989
Regular Meeting Page Six
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Motion/Second: Quick/Hankner to approve the first
• reading of Ordinance No. 468, amending the Munici-
pal Code of Mounds View by amending Chapter 104
entitled "Garbage and Rubbish", and waive the reading.
5 ayes 0 nays
Clerk/Administrator Pauley explained this ordinance
applies to the Bel Rae Ballroom only, and permits
the holder of an on-sale liquor license to sell
non-intoxicating malt liquor who also sells on-sale
wine,to sell intoxicating malt liquor at on-sale
without an additional license, as long as gross
receipts are at least sixty percent attributable to
the sale of food. He added no further fee would be
assessed, as the City was already assessing at the
maximum fee.
Motion/Second: Paone/Wuori to have the second
reading and adoption of Ordinance No. 467, amending
the Municipal Code of Mounds View by amending
Chapter 10I, entitled "Non-Intoxicating Liquor",
and waive the reading.
• Councilmember
Councilmember
Councilmember
Councilmember
Mayor Hankner
Wuori - aye
Paone - aye
Quick - aye
Blanchard -.aye
- aye
Motion Carried
12. Second Reading
and Adoption
of Ordinance
No. 467
Motion Carried
Clerk/Administrator Pauley explained the Council 13. Consideration
had held a public hearing on this matter two weeks of Resolution
ago, and the resolution prepared is consistent with No. 2500
the recommendation of the Planning Commission. The
City Attorney has reviewed and approved the proposed
resolution.
City Attorney Karney stated he feels the statute is
clear that owners and residents cannot use the
wetland in any. way not provided by the ordinance.
Motion/Second: Quick/Blanchard to approve Resolu-
tion No. 2500, approving a wetland alteration
permit and site plan to construct a four Alex in the
buffer zone of a wetland, at 7656/7660 Woodlawn
Drive, and waive the reading.
4 ayes. 1 nay Motion Carried
. Mayor Hankner voted against the motion, stating that
it was still bothersome to her.
Mounds View City Council June 26, 1989
Regular Meeting Page Seven
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attorney Karney advised the taxes had not been paid
in full, nor other requirements met. for the renewal
of the liquor license on this property, but he has
researched bankruptcy laws and find that they take
precedence over other laws, in that the bankruptcy
filing applies only to debts at that time, and the
owner is still required to pay future taxes,
insurance, and so forth, and the owner must make
payment on all debts, including back taxes. The
bankruptcy payments should be kept in full force
and effect, and if they lapse, the license should
be revoked.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley advised the health
inspector from the County has revoked their autho-
rization, based on the lack of meeting health
standards, and the owner has been notified by
certified letter of that. They cannot serve
alcohol on Sundays now, as Sunday sales must be
in conjunction with food service.
Staff recommends the Council deny the renewal of
the Sunday sales liquor license and restaurant
license and allow the applicant to reapply once he
has received certification from the County health
department, and. also approve the on-sale liquor
license contingent upon payment of the outstanding
utility bill by 4:30 PM on Friday, June 30, 1989.
Motion/Second: Blanchard/Paone to approve the
on-sale intoxicating liquor license for Loose Ends
on 10 contingent upon the following: 1) payment
in full of all utilities and taxes charged after
the filing of bankruptcy; 2) compliance with the
legally approved bankruptcy payment plan; and 3)
payment of all past due utilities no later than
4:30 PM on June 30, 1989.
5 ayes 0 nays
Motion/Second: Quick/Wuori to deny the renewal
of the Sunday sales and restaurant license for
Loose Ends on 10.
5 ayes 0 nays
•
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported all bills have
been paid, including past due taxes and utilities,
but they are still waiting for the insurance binder.
14. Consideration
of Renewal of
on-Sale
Intoxicating
and Sunday
Sales Licenses
for Loose Ends
on 10
Motion Carried
Motion Carried
15. Consideration
of Renewal of
On-Sale
Intoxicating
and Sunday
Sales Licenses
for Robert's
Off 10
Mounds View City Council June 26, 1989
Regular Meeting Page Eight
. Attorney Karney reported that under the ordinance
in Chapter 100.06, interest in more than one
license in the same class by one individual is
not allowed. Mr. Waste has an interest in both
Loose Ends on ZO and Robert's Off ZO, and has been
aware for over a year that it is against the
ordinance. The interest he has in Loose Ends on
10 is a fee interest.
Councilmember Paone questioned why he couldn't
receive the license, as he is only the owner and
not the operator of Loose Ends on 10.
Attorney Karney read from the ordinance, which
states interest is not allowed in any other establish-
ment in the City. In the past the Council has
required the property be put in someone elses name,
which Mr. Waste has done in the past and could do
again.
Councilmember Quick pointed out that once in the
past the City took no action on the renewal of a
license and the property reverted back to the
original owner. The Council was advised by Attorney
Meyers at that time that they must issue a license.
He pointed out the property could possibly revert
i back to Mr. Waste, leaving him with two liquor
licenses.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley stated giving a person
a license is granting a property right, and if it
is not renewed. they are denying the right of the use
of the property.
Councilmember Blanchard pointed out Mr. Povlitzki
held two licenses at the same time, althought it
was not known by the Council at that time and was
done in error.
Councilmember Quick pointed out Mr. Waste has been
aware of this situation for at least one year and
has had ample time to work out a solution.
Attorney Karney advised Mr. Waste would have to
divest himself of the ownership interest in Loose
Ends on 10.
Motion/Second: Quick/Wuori to approve the issuance
of the license for on-sale intoxicating and Sunday
sales license for Robert's Off 10, contingent upon
divestiture of ownership of Loose Ends on 10 by
Robert Waste, in a manner acceptable to the City
Attorney, prior to the close of business at 4:30 PM
on June 30. 1989.
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Mounds View City Council June 26, 1989
Regular Meeting Page Nine
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
. Mayor Hankner stated the interpretation of direct
or indirect interest will be left to Attorney Karney.
There was considerable discussion among the Council
before taking the vote on the motion.
Councilmember Blanchard stated she feels it is a
very minor point, but, as she has stated in the past.
if there is a law, they must enforce it or change the
law.
Councilmember Paone reiterated he did not see any
problem with Mr. Waste holding the license and
having interest in two separate liquor establish-
ments in the City.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley advised SYSCO has requested
an amendment to the utility agreement they entered into
with the City of Mounds View and City of Blaine, to
change the thirty day cancellation clause to six months,
to allow greater time for the company to find an
alternative water source in the event the agreement is
cancelled. The Blaine City Council has agreed to the
amendment.
Motion/Second: Paone/Wuori to approve the first
amendment to the agreement between the City of Mounds
View and City of Blaine for the purpose of permitting
certain property in the City of Mounds View to
connect to the municipal water system of the City of
Blaine for fire protection services, and authorize
the Mayor and Clerk/Administrator to enter into the
agreement.
5 ayes 0 nays
16. Consideration
of Staff Memo
Regarding
Mounds View/
Blaine Joint
Powers Agreement
for SYSCO Water
Connection
Motion Carried
Theresa Lexxon, 5229 Jeffrey Drive, asked if there was 17. Additional
an ordinance governing the landscaping of businesses Residents
within the City. She stated there is a c onsiderable Requests and
amount of neglect at B rooks gas station, Mr. Donut and Comments from
Robert's Off 10, with the lawns not being mowed, the Floor
garbage, broken glass, broken fences, and so forth.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley explained there is no
ordinance concerning landscaping, but new develop-
ments are required to enter into a development agree-
ment which includes a landscaping plan. Development
agreements began in the mid-70s. He added the courts
have ruled that government cannot dictate how people
• maintain their lawns, as long as noxious weeds are not
involved.
Mounds View City Council June 26, 1989
Regular Meeting Page Ten
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Clerk/Administrator Pauley explained that trash is
different and there is an ordinance which regulates
that.
Councilmember Paone left the meeting at 8:53 PM.
Mayor Hankner explained it has only been the past
five years in which amore aggressive position has
been taken.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley explained the City can
go out and talk to property owners, but their
ability to force someone to mow their lawn is
questionable.
Ms. Lexxon stated she had bought an abused property
and spent a good deal of time fixing it up and is
personally offended by businesses who do not take
care of tehir properties. She added she wished
Mr. Waste had more pride in his property, as it
is so visible to people driving through the City.
She added she felt the problem with Mr. Donut and
Brooks is more of an absentee owner situation.
Councilmember Wuori stated a franchising agent
would probably react very quickly to pictures and
letters from residents, complaining and showing the
condition of the properties.
Attorney Karney advised there are property rights which
the City cannot force on opinion.
Councilmember Paone rejoined the meeting at 9:02 PM.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reviewed the process
which is followed is sending notices for unkept yards,
and how time consuming it is. He also reviewed the
fee structure for work the City does in cleaning up
the yards.
Bill Buckingham, no address given., asked if the infor- 18. Consideration
mation requested two weeks ago was available concern- of Resolution
ing the proposed Woodale ex tension, as far as how much No. 2492 and
in MSA funds goes into this particular road, and No. 2501
whether the City can forego the funds for the future.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported Public Works
Director Minetor had reported to the Council that
the City received $257,005 in 1989 allocations
for state aid, and 25~ of that can be used for
maintenance purposes. $3,040 per year is attributed
to that section of roadway for maintenance. If the
City undesignates the street as an MSA street, the
City would not receive that money. There are no other
roads in the City that meet the criteria that have
not been designated already.
Mounds View City Council June 26, 1989
Regular Meeting Page Eleven
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mr.Buckingham stated he feels there are property
rights of the people in the area to consider, for
the quiet enjoyment of their property.
Attorney Karney explained that in order to have a
property right in something, there must be an
ownership interest. The residents do not have
ownership of the road, and there will not be any
residential property taken, and there is already
a road there.
Attorney Karney also advised that in terms of legal
notice, the Council has met all responsibilities
for legal notice, and gone beyond that. There is
no requirement for notice until a road is actually
planned to be built.
P~layor Hankner stated the Comp Plan went through all kinds of
public hearings in 1980, and notice was given then. It was up to
the residents to liik into it to see how it inv°olved them. She
also made reference to a 2 page memo listing the dates
the Council discussed the project. The demographics.-of tl~ie
,__
City are changing, with turnover occurring more every five
years. She added this Council has done everything they can
think of to inform the residents of what is happening,-and notice
has been given 't hat the Comp Plan is being updated, and it is
the responsibility of the residents to look into and see
how it effects them.
Mr. Buckingham asked if trucks could be restricted
if Woodale was not an MSA street.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley stated he believed so,
but would have to check with Mr. Minetor. He added
the road would be built to 9 ton, as they do with
all roads now, as they last much longer. He also
pointed out a notice had been put in the City
newsletter, in the Council Corner, which reports
on upcoming issues, and this item was mentioned
specifically.
Public Works Director Minetor joined the meeting
at 9:24 PM.
Ms. Lexxon stated she would Iike the street to
remain the way it was when she moved in, and that
any extension or improvement would devalue her
property.
Bill Ross, 5200 Greenfield, asked if the proper
boulevard would be restored if the street does
go through.
Mounds View City Council June 26, 1989
Regular Meeting Page Twelve
--------------------------------------------------------------------'-----
Mr. Minetor replied the proposal is for the north
end of the asphalt to be the north curb line, with
the widening to the southf which would be the
safest and most immediate improvement to the area.
An unidentified resident stated he did not feel
the road would enhance the homes.
Mr. Minetor reported the School Board has expressed
interest in the wetland alteration and Woodale Drive
extension, but they did not feel they had had enough
.time to review the proposals and they directed their
Staff to continue to explore both items.
Tim Nelson. of Everest Development, stated the
School Board approved continuing to discuss the
wetland improvements and to cooperate with the
City on Woodale and leave the decision to the City
on that.
Mayor Hankner stated the road extension is not a
School Board matter, but rather a Council matter.
The School Board only has to deal with the easement
issue. They do, however, need formal action on
the wetland issue.
Ms. Lexxon asked if rent is paid to the School
District for the use of the Edgewood Community
Center.
Mayor Hankner replied the program is operated by
the School District, and the School Board is the
governing body, and makes decisions on the use.
Wally Steiner, 5220 O'Connell, presented the
Council with a petition of people who would
like to see the road left as it is, as well as
the wetland. He stated that when added to the
petition presented two weeks ago, they have 137
signatures total.
Mayor Hankner pointed out the Council cannot
deal with the wetland alteration permit until the
Council knows what the School Board will be doing,
as they are the owners of the property.
Mr. Nelson suggested adopting the resolutions
contingent upon receiving approval from the School
Board.
Bill Frank, of Everest Development, stated their
preference would be to have the resolution passed
that approves the development and requiring a
development agreement to be entered into, taking
the wetland proposal into consideration. He added
Mounds View City Council
Regular Meeting
--------------------------------------------------'--
he is concerned with bouncing back and forth between
the two bodies now and suggested the resolution be
approved, contingent upon proceeding with whatever
level of wetland alteration and road extension is
decided upon.
Attorney Karney stated he had no problem with that,
as it would still require approval of the School
Board.
Mayor Hankner stated they have been operating on
the 1980 Comp Plan, which was adopted by then
Mayor McCarty, and'the Council assumed the people
were paying attention, but they now find out they
weren't. She added there is a precedent for this
wetland type of activity, with the SYSCO project.
and she personally is interested in seeing the
wetland enhanced; for educational purposes, but still
needs to know the feelings of the School Board.
Councilmember Wuori stated the Council needs an
indication from the School Board, pointing out that
it is fine to suggest something, but it is their
property. She added this is a good plan and is
well thought out. She added this is not just a
• neighborhood problem but is a citywide problem.
Mr. Minetor explained the School Board had indicated
they have a lot of interest but need more time to
explore all ramifications, such as future maintenance
costs, liabilities, and so forth.
Clerk/Administrtor Pauley explained a joint powers
agreement is being considered for the maintenance
of the wetland.
Mayor Hankner suggested giving approval to the
concept plan, minus the wetland alteration and road
extension at this time.
Mr. Frank stated they are willing to enter into an
agreement with the City and would go with whatever
the City decides on the wetland and road.
Motion/Second: Paone/Hankner to table Item 15, the
consideration of Resolution No. 2492, pending the
decision of the School Board, and approve Resolu-
tion No. 2501, approving the concept and development
stage plans for Mounds View Business Park South,
minus any reference to Woodale extended, approxi-
mately 400' east of the existing Woodale road sur-
face, or the wetland enhancement and issuance of
the wetland alteration permit for construction of
approximately 2 acres of the project within the
wetland buffer zone, and further table action on the
Woodale Drive extension and wetland enhancement pending
the decision of the School Board, and waive the reading.
June 26, 1989
Page Thirteen
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Mounds view City Council June 26, 1989
Regular Meeting Page Fourteen
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mr. Nelson presented a map, indicating where existing
Woodale Drive is, and the proposed extension.
Mayor Hankner explained the wetland alteration
permit and what is being requested and what consi-
derations are needed.
•
Clerk/Admdinistrator Pauley asked Council authori-
zation to mail out notices when this item is to be
discussed again.
Motion/Second.: Quick/Wuori to direct Staff to send
out notices informing the residents when this item
will be discussed again.
5 ayes 0 nays
Ben Kunrad stated he was a member of the family
that originally owned the property, and he reviewed
the history of the property and the wetland. He
stated he feels any work done on the wetland will
improve it.
Attorney Karney had no report.
Mr. Minetor asked approval of the partial payment
request of Westwood Engineering on the SYSCO project,
and Lametti & Sons. also on the SYSCO project.
Motion Carried
19. Report of
Attorney
Motion/Second: Wuori/Quick to approve the partial
payment to Westwood Professional Services for engineer-
ing work on the SYSCO project, in the amount of
$19.101.25, to be charged to the SYSCO tax incre-
ment fund.
5 ayes 0 nays
Motion/Second: Paone/Blanchard to approve the
partial payment to Lametti & Sons for the public
improvement portion of the SYSCO project, in the
amount of $190,665.26, to be charged to the SYSCO
tax increment fund.
5 ayes 0 nays
Councilmember Wuori had no report.
20. Report of
Staff Members
Motion Carried
Motion Carried
21. Report of
Councilmembers:
Councilmember
Wuori
Mounds View City Council June 26, 1989
Regular Meeting Page Fifteen
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Councilmember Paone had no report. Councilmember
Paone
Councilmember Quick asked for an update on the infor-
mation he had previously requested concerning the
appointment of the newest Charter Commission member.
Attorney Karney replied he believed it had been
received by his office. and he would forward it.
Councilmember Blanchard asked when the next recy-
cling day is, since the normally scheduled day
falls on the 4th of July holiday.
Ms. Hren replied it has been changed to July 5,
and notices have been sent to the papers, put on
the board outside City Hall, in the newsletter and
so forth.
Mayor Hankner reported she had met last week with
the mayors of Shoreview, Arden Hills and New
Brighton to discuss a number of items, including
waste management, school-district issues, the
purchase of property from the Army, and coordi-
nation between the Park and Rec programs. She
• added they are considering setting up a softball
day as a method of getting everyone together.
Mayor Hankner reported the Light Rail Transit
Committee would be meeting at 4 PM on June 27,
but she was not sure if she'd be able to attend.
Paul Mielke volunteered to attend in her glace.
Mayor Hankner reported the Reliever Airport Study
Advisory Group would be meeting on June 28 at 9 AM.
City Planner Hren will attend the meeting.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley asked that a hearing be
set on the 1989 long term financial plan for
July 10.
Motion/Second: Quick/Blanchard to set a public
hearing for 7:05 PM on Monday, July 10 for the
long term financial plan.
5 ayes 0 nays
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported on confusion
that exists statewide concerning the application
of truth in taxation with local governments. He
outlined the approach the City plans to take.
Councilmember
Quick
Councilmember
Blanchard
Mayor Hankner
22. Report of
Clerk/
Administrator
Motion Carried
Mounds View City Council June 26, 1989
Regular Meeting Page Sixteen
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
There being no further business before the Council, 23. Adjournment
Mayor Hankner adjourned the meeting at 10:45 PM.
Respectfully submitted,
Do ld F. Pau~ey /~
Cler dminis r or
•
•
_ _ _
i
June 2, 1989
• We, the undersigned, are opposed to the Woodale extention
and the wet land enhancement proposal.
NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE
~ ~
~/ ~ /3 t~ 6~ TN .~
~~ G~
;~
.~- ~ f~ ~u ~ ~~ ~s ~.
~
,
~7
/~ . ~i9-~C'~C'~- ~
' J ~^
~" t /~
C9" n i
~ ~ ~ ~J e~ .Gt ~~ "'I '' ~
~ ,~p
.
~. ~~.r ~~ / _ ~
__/
G~ ~_~ ~~ 4~z ~ Y ~~ L,~ °
~1J
t'^ J / • ~ O /V ~ ~ mow.. ~~ 7 G.. L l "~~,. i.~...t~. '
r
~~~en f ~ •
~
~ ..
L7"l~/L~QfJ n'1 ~1 ~/ .~c3 ~~~ ~~.>l~/~t~~a' iL, l.! `{, i. .t l.. 1 .. ri.Anc~~^~
~ 4
June 2, 1989
We, the undersigned, are opposed to the Woodale extention
and the wet land enhancement proposal.
•
•
U°
June 2, 1989
• We, the undersigned, are opposed to the Woodale extention
and the wet land enhancement proposal.
SIGNATURE
Per- v.
G~f1/
~i! .
~~
•
~~
Z
•