Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - 1992/12/28CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW CITY COUNCIL DECEMBER 28, 1992 7:00 P.M. AGENDA The City Council is provided background information for agenda items a.n advance by staff and appointed commissions, committees and boards. Decisions are based on this information, as well as City policy and practices, input from constituents and a Councilmember's personal judgement. If you have comments, questions or information regarding an item on the agenda, please step forward to be recognized by the Mayor during the ".Residents Requests and Comments From the Floor" item on the • agenda. Please state your name and address for the record. A11 comments are appreciated. A copy of aZ1 printed materials relating to the agenda item is available for public inspection at the Recording Secretary's Table. 1. 2. 3. CALL TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL - Linke Quick Wuori Blanchard Rickaby 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Comments: December 9, 1992 Budget Hearing COUNCIL ACTION: A T D • AGENDA PAGE TWO DECEMBER 28, 1992 December 14, 1992 Regular Meeting COUNCIL ACTION: A T D Comments: 5. SPECIAL ORDER OF BUSINESS: No special business scheduled for this meeting. 6. RESIDENTS REQUESTS AND COMMENTS FROM THE FLOOR Citizens' comments are encouraged to allow individvaZ citizens to address the Council, as a whole, on a matter of interest or concern to the citizens. The preseswation of the Citizens' Comments item on the agenda is important ui order to encourage and maintain this information flow. To preserve and protect this valuable communications link, a speaker is limited to three (3) minutes. • ------------------------------------------------------------- CITIZENS: BEFORE SPEAKING PLEASE GIVE YOUR FULL • NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE MINUTES ------------------------=------------------------------------ ?. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 7:05 p.m. To Consider New and Used Car Sales License for Auto Central, Inc., 2975 Highway 10. Request that the hearing be rescheduled to January 11, 1993 to allow proper notification. (Staff Report No. 92-440C) COUNCIL ACTION: A T D Comments: 8. CONSENT AGENDA: A. Authorize the Purchase of Permanent Easements from Mounds View Residence Inn in the Amount of $4,650 per Easement (Staff Report No. 92-441C) B. Adopt Resolution No. 4321 Approving Just and Correct Claims Against City Funds • AGENDA PAGE THREE • DECEMBER 28, 1992 C. Set a Public Hearing on the 1993 Utility Budgets for 7:10 p.m. (Staff Report No. 92-442C) D. Licenses for Approval Gasoline Stations - xpires 12/31j93 Mounds View Amoco - Renewal Mounds View Phillips 66 - Renewal Retail Foods of Minnesota (Brooks) - Renewal Superamerica - Renewal Fina - Renewal (contingent upon payment of fee) N_on-Intoxicatina Liquor - Off Sale Ex.,pires 12j31/93 Superamerica - Renewal Tom Thumb - Renewal Retail Foods of Minnesota (Brooks) - Renewal New and Used Auto Sales - Expires 12/31/93 • Saturn of St. Paul, Inc. - Renewal Amusement Devices - Expires 12J31J 93 American Amusement Arcades - Renewal Mermaid Roberts Aaendas and Minutes - Expires 12/31/93 Paster Enterprises - Renewal Nielsen and Associates, Inc. - Renewal Fire Protection - Expires 6 30/93 Design Plus Fire Protection - New Sian - ExQires 6/30j93 Crosstown Sign,-Inc. - Renewal Juleen Designs, Inc.- Renewal Sewer and Water - Expires 6j30/93 Sabby Constracting - New Heating and Air Conditioning - Expires 6/30/93 Aarons - New General - Expires 6/30/93 Donahue Construction - New • AGENDA PAGE FOUR DECEMBER 28, 1992 9. COUNCIL BUSINESS: A. Consideration of Rejection of Bids for Telecommunication System for City Hall (Staff Report No. 92-443C) COUNCIL ACTION: A T D Comments: B. Consideration of Resolution No. 4324 Approving a Budget Amendment, Staff Report No. 92-444C COUNCIL ACTION: A T D • Comments• C. Consideration of Resolution No. 4323 Authorizing City Staff to Enter into a Development Agreement with Keith Harstad for the Greenfield Estates Project, Planning Case No. 333-91, Staff Report No. 92-445C • COUNCIL ACTION: A T D Comments: D. Consideration of Resolution No. 4322 Authorizing Budget Transfers for 1992 Salary Adjustments, (Staff Report No. 92-446C) COUNCIL ACTION: A T D Comments• 10. REPORTS• ' 1. Report of Councilmembers: Rickaby, Quick, Blanchard, Wuori 2. Report of Mayor Linke 3. Report of Administrator 4. Report of Staff • AGENDA PAGE FIVE DECEMBER 28, 1992 5. Report of Attorney 11. ADJOURNMENT• NEST COIINCIL WORK SESSION: NEST COIINCIL MEETING: JANIIARY 4, 1993 JANIIARY 11, X993 1992 ~1 ~J • PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA Regular Meeting December 28, 1992 Mounds View City Hall 2401 Hwy. 10, Mounds View, MN 55112 CALL TO ORDER The Mounds View City. Council was called to order by Mayor Linke at 7:00 p.m. on Monday, December 28, 1992. LEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Pledge of Allegiance was said. ROLL CALL MEMBERS PRESENT:. Councilmembers Quick, Wuori, Blanchard, Rickaby and Mayor Linke. MEMBERS ABSENT: None ALSO PRESENT: Samantha Orduno, City Administrator; Tim Cruikshank, Management Assistant; Ric Minetor, Director of Public Works/ City Engineer APPROVAL OF MINUTES: MOTION/SECOND: Blanchard/Wuori to approve the minutes of the December 9, 1992, Budget Hearing, as presented. VOTE: 4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Councilmember Rickaby abstained from the vote as she was not present at the Budget Hearing. • Mounds View City Council ~egular Meeting Page Two December 28, 1992 MOTION/SECOND: Rickaby/Quick to approve the minutes of the December 14, 1992, Council Meeting, as presented. VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried SPECIAL ORDER OF BUSINESS: There was no special order of business scheduled for this meeting. RESIDENTS REQUESTS AND COMMENTS FROM THE FLOOR: Richard Oman, 8205 Groveland Road, stated the he had spoken to the City Administrator, Samantha Orduno, regarding the receipt of Council Packets. Mr. Oman stated that he had received four or five packets. After reviewing the packets and comparing the packets he received to those that the City Council received he reported that he did not receive all the materials that the Council received. Mr. Oman questioned why he was being denied information. Mr. Oman commented that he had been billed for the packets but had not paid for them because he was upset about not receiving 11 of the information. Mr. Oman further stated that Orduno stated a ~ifferent fee than what he was invoiced. Mayor Linke explained to Mr. Oman that anyone who requests packets gets exactly the same information as the Council with the exception to large books or binders because of the cost of copying them. Linke also pointed out that many times items are received at the meetings and that those same items are available to the public and are located in the Public Book on the Recording Secretary's table. Samantha Orduno, City Administrator, pointed out to the Mr. Oman what it costs to process an agenda packet and that the City is charging a very minimal amount for the information in the packet. Orduno pointed out that for an average agenda it costs approximately $9.00 per packet. The City charges $55.00 per year for 36 packets. Orduno asked Mr. Oman what items he didn't receive that the Council receives. Mr. Oman reported that he had not received "This Is It", "Staff Stuff", tax information, some staff reports, and the budget information. Oman stated that when he spoke to Samantha about receiving a packet she told him it would be between $25 and $30 for the entire year. Mr. Oman stated that he understood that the Council determines what information is put into the packet. Orduno stated that in order to clear the record she had never quoted $25 or ~30 as a cost for packets for a year. Mounds View City Council ~egular Meeting Page Three December 28, 1992 Mayor Linke stated that in order to cut costs he has his packet reduced by not including approved minutes. There is a book at City Hall that he can use for research if he needs to. Linke stated that he does not receive the "Info Only" material in his packet because it is costly to run all of these Mayor Linke stated that in order to cut costs he has his packet reduced by not including approved minutes. There is a book at City Hall that he can use for research if he needs to. Linke stated that he does not receive the "Info Only" material in his packet because it is costly to run all of these items. so there is a ring binder of these items kept for the Councilmembers to review. Orduno explained that the items Mr. Oman referred to are internal informational documents. These documents are not a part of the packet. These documents inform the Council of what the staff has been working on during the week and month. Mr. Oman stated he would compare what he received in his packet to what the Council receives and bring this item up again at another meeting. PUBLIC HEARINGS: Samantha Orduno, City Administrator, requested that the Council reschedule the public hearing that would consider the New and Used Car Sales License ~or Auto Central, Inc., 2975 Highway 10 to January 11, 1993. The reasons for these request are 1) time schedule for notification wasn~t adequate and, 2) the City had received calls from residents who would like to attend the hearing but could not make the December 28 meeting because they would be out of town for the holidays. MOTIONJSECOND: Linke/Quick to reschedule public hearing to consider New and Used Car Sales License for Auto Central, Inc., 2975 Highway 10 to January 11, 1993 at 7:05 p.m. VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried CONSENT AGENDA• Samantha Orduno, City Administrator, read the Consent Agenda. Mayor Linke asked if there were any items the Council would like to remove. Item D was removed by Mayor Linke. MOTION/SECOND: Wuori/Rickaby to adopt Consent Agenda minus Item D., Licenses for Approval VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Mayor Linke explained that he removed Item D. from the Consent Agenda because of the contingency regarding payment of the licensing fee for ~ina. Mounds View City Council ~egular Meeting Page Four December 28, 1992 MOTION/SECOND: Linke/Blanchard to adopt gasoline station license renewals contingent upon the payment of the licensing fee from Fina VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried COUNCIL BUSINESS: A. Tim Cruikshank, Management Assistant, reviewed Staff Report No. 92-443C regarding the rejection of bids for telecommunication system for City Hall. Cruikshank reported that the City received five bids for telecommunication systems. The two lowest bids did not meet minimum specifications. The next lowest bid met all requirements but was $3,522 more than budgeted for this project. Cruikshank explained that the Council could reject all bids and reevaluate the bid specifications and rebid. • Mayor Linke commented that the City should not have to reevaluate the bids and change specifications just to have the low bidders be able to meet the specifications set by the City. Linke stated that the Council had discussed the specifications approximately six months ago and the minimum needs were set with these specifica- tions. Mayor Linke stated that in his opinion rebidding will not change the numbers at all. The budget amount of $15,000 was set a year ago and the low bid is $3,000 higher than budgeted, however, the $15,000 was set with really nothing to go on. Mayor Linke stated that, in his opinion, the City should accept the lowest bid that met all the requirements and move forward with the project. Councilmember Rickaby asked what fund the additional $3,500 would come from. Mayor Linke stated this could come out of contingency. Samantha Orduno, City Administrator, stated that the City had made several capital purchases that were purchased for prices lower than expected and that there was $3,522 left in the capital fund. Orduno explained that because the implementation of the phone system would be delayed until 1993 it would be necessary to amend the 1993 budget to allow monies set aside in the 1992 budget to be rolled over to the 1993 budget. Orduno stated that $3,522 could be taken from contingency and the already budgeted amount of $15,000 could be rolled over to the 1993 budget for the telecommunications project. Councilmember Wuori commented that this approach made sense to her as the project entailed a great deal of staff time and would take more time to rewrite the specifications. Wuori concurred with Mayor Linke in that the City should accept the lowest bidder who met specifications. Mounds View City Council Page Five ~egular Meeting December 28, 1992 Councilmember Blanchard asked that, for the general public, this project be briefly reviewed at this time. Tim Cruikshank stated that this system consists of new phone units for staff systems and a central system that dispatches phone calls when they come in. This system will enable City Hall to be a better communicator. Public Works will have their own phone number as well as Park, Recreation and Forestry. The groundwork for this project was performed by a group of city employees approximately one year ago. The telephone committee surveyed the needs of the staff and had vendors come in to demonstrate their systems for the group. Orduno commended the telephone committee for their work commenting that this was a year long process. Orduno stated that-the committee did an outstanding job in their research and recommendation. This project started in July of 1991. MOTION/SECOND: Wuori/Rickaby to accept the bid of $18,522 from Executone for a Telecommunication System for City Hall VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried ~. Orduno reviewed Staff Report 92-444C in conjunction with in Item A. above regarding the approval of a budget amendment to carry over budget capital expenditure for new telecommunication system for City Hall. MOTION/SECOND: Linke/Wuori to adopt Resolution No. 4324 Approving Budget Amendment to Carryover Budget Capital Expenditure for New Telecommunication System for City Hall VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried C. Ric Minetor, Director of Public Works/City Engineer, reviewed Staff Report No. 92-445C regarding Resolution No. 4323 Authorizing City Staff to Enter into a Development Agreement with Keith Harstad for the Greenfield Estates Project. Minetor stated that Mr. Harstad made payment to the City for all outstanding fees remaining from the review process of the Greenfield Estates development. Minetor stated that staff had provided a draft copy of the Development Agreement to the representatives of Mr. Harstad for their review and passed out a draft copy of this development agreement to the Council at this time. Minetor further stated that the City Attorney will be reviewing this document. The development agreement is basically a contract that protects all of the City's interests with regard to this development. Councilmember Rickaby stated that she would have liked to have a copy of the draft in final form to prepare for her vote on the issue. Mounds View City Council ~egular Meeting Page Six December 28, 1992 Minetor stated that the draft he handed out was a "boiler plate" agreement incorporating the Council's stipulations. There are still calculations and plans that need to be put into the document. Mayor Linke stated that when the final draft was given to the City Administrator and himself, he would give the other Councilmembers an opportunity to review it. Resolution No. 4323 is only authorizing the Mayor and Clerk-Administrator to execute a Development Agreement on behalf of the City when it reaches its final point. MOTIONLSECOND: Quick/Linke to adopt Resolution No. 4323 Authorizing the City of Mounds View to Execute Development Agreement No. 92-97 with Keith Harstad VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried D. Samantha Orduno, City Administrator reviewed Staff Report No. 446C regarding Resolution No. 4322 Authorizing Budget Transfers for 1992 Salary Adjustments. Orduno stated that this was a housekeeping item and that as a consequence of 2992 salary adjustments for cost of living and comp worth it is necessary to make budget transfers from the salary contingency accounts to the departmental salary and fringe benefit accounts. VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried REPORTS• Report of Councilmembers: Councilmember Rickabv wrote a letter in rebuttal to Mayor Linke's statements made at the December 9, 1992 Budget Hearing. Council- member Rickaby read the letter publicly and requested that the letter and attachment become a permanent part of the meeting minutes. (Councilmember Rickaby's letter is attached as part of the minutes.) At the conclusion of Councilmember Rickaby's reading of the letter, Mayor Linke commented, "So much for not politicking at Council Meetings." Councilmember Ouick - No report. Councilmember Blanchard - No report. Councilmember Wuori wished everyone a "Happy New Year". Wuori reported that newsletters were mailed out to all residents and hoped that everyone had received their copy. Wuori indicated that some newsletters could be received late because of the holiday mail. ~ounds View City Council Regular Meeting Mayor Linke's Report: Mayor Linke wished everyone a "Happy New Year." Administrator's Report: Page Seven December 28, 1992 * Samantha Orduno reminded everyone of the Regional Senior Center Informational Meetings. They are as follows: Fridley January 13 7:00 p.m. New Brighton January 14 7:00 p.m. Spring Lake Park Janaury 27 7:00 p.m. Mounds View Janaury 28 7:00 p.m. The representatives on the Task Force from Mounds View were: Jerry Skelly, Sr. Lulu Cory Charlynn Robertson Bill Woods Orduno stated that Mounds View was well represented and the members of the Task Force should be commended. * Also, Orduno took this opportunity to wish everyone a "Happy New Year". Orduno stated that she has enjoyed working for the Council and staff of the City this past year. Orduno thanked her staff and commented that it is the best staff around. * Orduno reported that the City is advertising for a new police officer. Approximately 60 people had applied at this time. * Orduno announced that there would be a meeting of the Golf Course Task Force on January 14, 1993 at 6:00 p.m. at City Hall. Mayor Linke announced that the next Work Session would be held January 4, 1993 and that the next regular Council Meeting would be held January li, 1993. There being no further business before this Council, Mayor Linke adjourned the meeting at 7:46 p.m. Respectfully submi ed, Mic ele Severson _~ .. ~. Because Mayor Linke has made a public statement in my absence at the December 9, 1992 council meeting in which he blatantly misrepresented statements by me and because those misrepresentations have been recorded in the minutes, I find it necessary to correct those misrepresentations at this time and submit those corrections for the minutes of this meeting. At the December 9 hearing Mayor Linke stated falsely that my letter to the editor stated "that the information given to the Council was not correct and, therefore, the Council did not have correct information when setting the levy." A copy of that letter to the editor is attached. Any reader can plainly see that no such statement was made nor is there any statement in that letter to the editor that could be reasonably interpreted as such. The entire letter to the editor was clearly in the context of discussions at the October 13, 1992 council meeting concerning the franchise fee. There was no reference whatsoever to information given to council at the time of setting the levy. It only talks about information given out to the public at the October 13 council meeting. In addition, Mr. Linke made another misrepresentation of my statements when he stated that I asked at the December 7, 1992 worksession where the cuts were that had been made by staff. I asked no such question. I did ask for the proposals or recommendations concerning cuts that Don Brager told the council on November 2, 1992 that he would bring to the council on December 7, 1992. At that November 2, 1992 meeting, the night before the election, Mr. Brager told the council that all budget projections were made considering the LGA amounts that were promised by the state. However, since we had experienced cuts in those LGA amounts in the past, he thought the council might consider cuts in the budget. The council was asked at that meeting to suggest areas for proposed cuts. I recommended that Mr. Brager include the cuts supported by residents who answered the survey when asked to make a 10~ cut in a budget. Mr. Linke responded that the entire survey should be considered, not just that portion. I also recommended that the goal setting session be cut. With that, Mr. Brager promised to bring recommendations for possible cuts to the December 7, 1992 worksession. It was those recommendations that I was asking about at the December 7, 1992 worksession., Mr. Linke also falsely states that I stated at several meetings that I had cuts but had none at this meeting. The fact is that up to the point I walked out of the meeting, I had proposed cutting the $3,000 fee for an outside facilitator to the goal setting session. Instead of making that cut, the rest of the council added another $2,000 to the budget to again have that goalsetting session off site. In addition, I proposed deleting the budgeted monies for raises in salary for the mayor and city councilmembers since the charter did not allow any such raises to go into effect until after the next election. The council announced that they had always done it this way. It was concluded that the city attorney would be consulted on the morning of December 8, 1992, whether the raises could go into effect for 1993 and if so they would stay in the budget. Therefore, the statement that I came up with no cuts at that meeting was blatantly false. ~ O "'!~ ~O u~ c~ !D ~ ~~ 3 •+- t0 N .v °'~~ ~~'b°5.~ ~, ~ • •~. ~ p, a ., ~ o,ooo ~, o o w VtOn 00 D y o o c ~ ~ G O ' .f Cad $, ° g`~~•°' C r• ~ y 7- y Ow l"f .O W0 n CT a ~.~'y ~ ; ~o 1 V1 ~ n A A~~a~o ~ ~ f7 r. y fA Vl w ~y~y~co ~ ~' y fD n ti `r C ~ o O g p S ~--5 m ~a `-' ~ a b ~; ,.~,' ti ~ ~ `~5~00°~ w cu cu a a S, =± 5' o `~"Z d ~ ~ `~ ... .r -~ ~ ~ b n ~ c ~. (~/1 UQ d ~,~Q m~ ~~~~ y . oo~~~ Qrn ~w~Cw y~ ~ ~ yc ~~ ~~~~~ ~° ~° v~ ~~a-~ ~ ° w $,~ ~~ .p ~~Z'c~o o ~O .~ c° w ~ °:~ ~ ~ ..~ ,0 ~_~ a-y aQ~yz oc ~~m~~ ~ ~3"° ~ ~• C ~ N ~~ Fo e E ~ 5'Er" c g.b ~: o ~ w ~•~~5'~5~ ~ °o^ c°oG',S o y° rCi+ ~ ^ uwo a ~ C N d w ~ :; H, ^~ ~ ~ 'n (°E C. ~"' D ~, O ~ H <p ~ ~`' w. f~0 c~ ~ ~CD ~ ^ H ~ ~'a~~ ~ ~ o cao w w 6'~'b 5 r.a a Cy a ^ ~ ~ ~ ~: ~ ~ p' w c~no ~ ~ 5' ~ C c ~ w 5~ ~ O ~ ~. w"~'* w ~$ g' -; a r' tr F ~ ;+, ^ ~.' C C H'O •O S cG~Op y w r. `C, ^.. ° n j~ 'J' ^ to vpi `+• ~ j ~ `CI'w.. ~'~'' cGO ~~~ g c~o ~.Ob cOi ^ O y ~ i ~ ~~c.~ ~.~ ~ V~ M `rOnc<o'd b'O~'°w °:p.O ~~c~^o~^ °` cyo~~D^,d~p ~,p,oo~.» ~~ ~i'~ ". ~,~ ~~.A r0„ tir,.'~ ~.~ r.o ~ ~tD s w o p p ~ ~+ .y "J' ;+ p~ ~ ^ o. ~ ° (D >! -+ O !0 ~ w <9 ~ f9 p v"C7 G' r. r+ ~ ° r. ~y 6,~' ~ t7 "'~;~ Ooy ~f?Gj•.~ N ~O ~ y ~.• "y rQ ate' w'< ~-y C y ~ ~p y ~' oo a 7 ° ~e ~' °: e ~ . o co co ~e ca c~ 5• ~' co ~ o ~ ~ co ~ ~ o y O ~"'' ~~~ a~ ~Q ~ ~ i~+ ~. ~' a v r J /~S^ IV r~ ~ ~~ ~ ° ~•~ ~ ~,~ ~' ~ o o' 'gib S ~o y ~ a~oo ~~a5 c.~D ~ ~e c ~ ,< ~ ~ ~ e S ~ rr ~r 5 $' ~'~ ~ °~' G'tD o ~Er~ ~~.~ ~ ^,~ y 5.~~c"°, aye°~y,~ p°~~'~ o~ G a~~ cce ° ~'`~ r.~' r+cy".~ ~ c7~ ^ O (9 0~' 'C9 ~b E' c9b ~'p ,.,rn ~+ Ei'o CT a~ ~ CD ~ y o'er ~.co ~Ow aw ~' w~C ° E'cae e' ~, ~ ;-. ~; tr~'~ o.R.o 5.~ ~' ~' ~~~.~a w'a~~ ~c~'",wH~:o.oEr•< wo o~~ ~ Zo o ~c ~ w C x•, o xC~ d c ~ wc° ~< co f, 's5.~ ~ ° ~ $ p,~ ~'o S ao F~~ ~-~`< d ~ g y g ~'E ".~ ~ S o co o a° 'ay ~ Er~aaOFo y H .,.ec vEr `° ~ ~Ao ~~ ~~ ~~~ y`~ w ~ ~ ~ E$ ~ o y'd ~~ ~o ~ o ~ ~ °~ er" Er ~' O.'O C (D ~ p O r. ~ ~1 '+ O - ~C ~n M ` ~ O 'd " ~, G~ C' y ° ~ w 5 r.+ fD~ `'~c`<~'~'*° ~ G"'~Mso~ ~coco`~r.°rn v+~,c.~.w 6, co~'~ ~ » ~ ~~~r-.'~ y ?: ~ ~ ~b g <g ° io ^ v'GP ~' ~A.~,~ boo s ~ co fin' 0 7 ~ o x r. 7a'~e cn co co ~ ~ ~ w c9 fin' ' : •, ~e E ., ~ ~n . •,, ~ •e w . N.r. (~ ~. ~ Er'd ~ 5'$' ?» 8 ,,,.. 5'7o cao ~' ° c9 c ~ 5' o i % Er ,,,,,, 5~' o 0 0 ?i O O O r.OQ o-.~ N ti N r~ to A ~..+ A G O o ~ O~F+~ ~r.~~, ~Nbo C F n' bw ~ r~~' w : ' f9 O N' ~+ ~ N~ V, ~ .+ ~ fp ~' `~ fir' ~, 6. ~°' c~~ ~~p 5 ~ ~ ~ p; N E' i~+~ ~9 ~ rr ~• e+ iS a ^ O ~i ~ ~t OQ 'O"' ~ n ~ Cry F a'TJ '.' w. '.. to v+ C "w ~ p,~ o b'~,uo ° Zco 5 F ~ c-' ~ wc~ ~ c6'o ° ^rn w r. ere' "t " f~ o ~ rn co :± ~' "yd ~ '~ O p ~ ~ Oo 'd pip y O ~+ 'R ~' ~ ~ O a.1'i r pay• r. ~ ~' ~ p :7 w, ~' O ~ ~o N ~ ~.'v " O r ~ y '' N r. vOi ~, ~ O 'd b .Oi .~w ctr,c~'o~o~^"'S'o,o~e ENO 5'ce o~.» ~bf9•, 5n~ ~,o°oc~ ~o.oos^S~Erc<o~SS~~ S°C~<~~e~.°~, '^~~ O A bo 'per' C O < 'C ~j gA Cy. ~ S' ~ ~ b rq ~7 m ~~c.~~'o,o ~axcos~~ ~~~~^y~,c~n~w°°°.:Er c o ~ ~ ~, e o ~ ce ~ ~ ,.. ~e c -, ~ co .. ~e w c~ cs •, L• •e c ~ ~ ° ... ~ . ~ ;. • • • ~!~~~~ ,:sa 36 ~ ~ uh~~~~ II //,, ~~ ~~ ~'~-G~~ ~ ~ n ~_ ~ ~ ~-Sf°L~'c{ `~. D ~~' ~`l ~a ~~ ~ ~~~v~ ~~ , ~e ~~~ ~ ~ ~ X02 7 ~.,~-'-~~ ~`= ~'YI -~ ~. ~Ly7 ~ -1..-,t.,~ ~,~., , ,S~i'~J' z--~-- ' ~ %~ ,~ ~ _ , r ; ~..: ; ~ '~ ,,-, ~; ~~~ s~~y ~ ~~ ~~-- u~~~ __ ,~ ~ ~U ._ __ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ,. ~~ ~~