HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - 1992/02/10
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
CITY COUNCIL.
FEBRUARY 10, 1992
7:00 P.M.
C.
AGENDA
The City Council is provided background information for agenda items sn
advance by staff and appointed commissions, committees and boards.
Decisions are based on this information, as we1.Z as City policy and
pzactices, znput from constituents and a Councilatember's personal
judgement. If you have comments, questions or information regarding an
item on the agenda, please step forward to be recognized by the Mayor
during the "Residents Requests and Comments From the Floor" item on the
agenda. Please state your name and address for the record. A1Z comments
are appreciated. A copy of a1S printed materials re.Zatzng to the agenda
item is available for public inspection at the Recording Secretary's Table.
1. CALL TO ORDER
Z. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
3. ROLL CALL -
4. APPROVAL, OF MINUTES•
Wuori, Quick,
Blanchard, Rickaby,
Links
January 27, 1992
Regular Meeting
COUNCIL ACTION: A T D
5. SPECIAL ORDER OF BUSINESS:
1. Presentation of the Distinguished Budget
Presentation Award to Finance Director Don 8rager by
Richard Pribyl on Behalf of the Government Finance
Officers Association of the United States and Canada
AGENDA
PAGE TWO
FEBRUARY 10, 1992
6. RESIDENTS REQUESTS AND COMMENTS FROM THE FLOOR
Citizens' comments are encouraged to a1Zow individual citizens to address
the Council, as a whole, on a matter of interest or concern to the
citizens. The preservation of the Citizens' Comments item on the agenda is
important zn order to encourage and maintain this information flow. To
preserve and protect this vaZuabZe ewmaunications Zirsk, a speaker is
Zsmited to three (3) minutes.
-------------------------------------------------------------
CITIZENS: BEFORE SPEARING PLEASE GIVE YOUR FULL
NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE MINUTES
-------------------------------------------------------------
7. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
None
8. CONSENT AGENDA:
1. Adopt Resolution No. 4181 Approving Just and Correct
Claims Against City Funds
2. Licenses for Approval
- None
3. Authorize Purchase of a Water Utility Truck (Staff
Report No. 92-165C)
4. Approve Declaration of Surplus Equipment (Staff
Report No. 92-166C}
5. Adopt Resolution No. 4180 In Support of the
Application for A Community Development Block
Grant (CDBG) by Northwest Youth and Family Services
(NWYFS)
6. Adopt Resolution No.4179 A Community Development
Grant Application for Park and Recreation (Staff
Report No. 92-167C)
7. Adopt Resolution No. 4189 Approving a Community
Development Block Grant Application for the City of
Mounds View to Improve the Accessibility of City
Hall (Staff Report No. 92-168C)
8. Consideration of Resolution No. 4190 In Support of
A Community Development Block Grant Application
For Paster Enterprises
•
AGENDA
PAGE THREE
FEBRUARY 10, 1992
9. Adopt Resolution No. 4184 Closing Improvement Bonds
of 1981 and Advance Refunding Bonds of 1976 and
Resolution No. 4185 Establishing the City Hall
Improvements Fund (Staff Report No. 91-169C)
COUNCIL ACTION:A T D
9. COUNCIL BUSINESS:
1. Consideration of Surface Water Management Plan
Staff Report No. 92-170C)
COUNCIL ACTION: A T D
2. Consideration of Setting a Public Hearing for
Monday, March 9, 1992 at 7:05 p.m. to Consider
Changes in City License and Fee Structure (Staff
Report No. 92-171}
COUNCIL ACTION: A T D
3. Consideration of Resolution No. 4182 In Support of
Special Legislation Facilitating The Creation of
Multi-Jurisdictional Senior Center (Staff Report No.
9~-172C)
COUNCIL ACTION: A T D
4. Consideration of Resolution No. 4187 Authorizing
Expenditure to Conduct a Community Service Survey
(Staff Report No. 92-173C)
COUNCIL ACTION: A T D
5. Consideration of Resolution No. 4183 Creating a
Single Polling Place Designation for the
Presidential Primary Election on April 7, 1992 in
the City of Mounds View (Staff Report No. 92-174C)
COUNCIL ACTION: A T D "
AGENDA '
PAGE FOUR
FEBRUARY 10, 1992
6. Consideration of Resolution No. 4185 Regarding City
Hal]. Improvments (Staff Report No. 92-175C)
COUNCIL ACTION: A T D
7. Consideration of Resolution Regarding Local
Government Trust Fund (Staff Report No. 92-176C)
COUNCIL ACTION: ~A T D
8. Easement Acquisition for Long Lake Road Project
(To be provided Monday evening.}
COUNCIL ACTION: A T D
9. Consideration of Setting A Public Hearing for
Monday, February 24, 1992 at 7:05 p.m. to Consider
Saturn Car Dealership
COUNCIL ACTION: A T D
10. Consideration of Setting A Public Hearing for
Monday, February 24, 1992 at 7:10 p.m. to Consider
A Planned Unit Development for Mounds View Business
Park South
COUNCIL. ACTION: A T D
10. REPORTS: '
1. Report of Councilmembers: Wuori, Quick,
Blanchard, Rickaby _
2. Report of Mayor Linke
3. Report of Administrator
4. Report of Staff
5. Report of Attorney
•
AGENDA
PAGE FIVE
FEBRUARY 10, 1992
11. ADJOURNMENT
NE%T COIINCIL WORK SESSION: MARCH 2, 1992
NE%T COIINCIL MEETING: FEBRUARY 24, 1992
•
•
PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCII,
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA
Regular Meeting
February 10, 1992
Mounds View City Hall
2401 Hwy. 10, Mounds View, MN 55112
CALL TO ORDER
•
The Mounds View City Council was called to order by Mayor Linke at 7:00 p.m.
on Monday, February 10, 1992.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The Pledge of Allegiance was said.
ROLL CALL
MEMBERS PRESENT: Councilmembers Wuori, Quick, Blanchard, Rickaby and
Mayor Linke.
MEMBERS ABSENT: None
ALSO PRESENT: Samantha Orduno, City Administrator, Ric Minetor,
Public Works Director/City Engineer, Don Bracjer,
Finance Director, Mary Saarion, Parks, Recreation
and Forestry Director
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Blanchard to approve January 27, 1992
minutes as amended.
Councilmember Rickaby amended page five,
paragraph 1, sentence 5 by adding that she
asked that this item be placed on the February 3
Work Session agenda to discuss any further tasks
the Council may want the group to consider.
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
ounds View City Council .Page Two
~gular Meeting February 10, 1992
SPECIAL ORDER OF BUSINESS:
1. Presentation of the Distinguished Budget Presentation Award made
to Finance Director, Don Brager, and Mayor Linke by Richard
Pribyi on behalf of the Government Finance Officers Association
of the United States and Canada for the 1991 City Budget.
RESIDENTS RE UESTS AND COMMENTS FROM THE FLOOR
There were no requests nor comments from the residents.
FUBLIC HEARINGS
here were no public hearings scheduled for this meeting.
CONSENT AGENDA
Samantha Orduno, City Administrator, read the items on the proposed Consent
Agenda.
uncilmember Blanchard asked that items 5 through 8 be removed from the
~oposed Consent Agenda for clarification by the City Administrator.
MOTION/SECOND: Wuori/Quick to adopt the Consent Agenda
minus items 5 through 8.
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Samantha Orduno, City Administrator, explained what a Community Development
Block Grant is, where the funds come from, what the funds are used for and
stated that the grant application must come through the City.
Discussion evolved around item ~8, Consideration of Resolution No. 4190 In
Support of a Community Development Block Grant Application for Paster
Enterprises. Orduno explained that Paster Enterprises will use these funds
to upgrade their facility to comply with the American Disability Act. Such
things as handicapped curb cuts, lighting, better signage for the visually
impaired, audible alarm systems and general upgrading will be undertaken so
that the premises would not become a social blight.
MOTION/SECOND: Blanchard/Wuori to adopt Resolution Nos. 4180, 4179,
4189 and 4190 with regards to Community Development Block Grants
Alice Frits, 8072 Long Lake Road asked Tippie Borges, Paster Enterprises,
exactly what Paster intended to do with the funds. Ms. Borges reiterated
at Samantha Orduno, City Administrator, had explained.
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
unds View City Council Page Three
~qular Meeting February 10, 1992
COUNCIL BUSINESS:
1. Ric Minetor, Director of Public Works/City Engineer, introduced
Rocky Keehn of Short-Elliott-Hendrickson to discuss the elements
of the plan, necessary ordinance changes and the future steps for
implementation. Mr. Keehn stated that copies of the plan are
available for review at the Mounds View Branch of the Ramsey
County Library.
Minetor introduced Resolution No. 4186 Adopting a Surface Water
Management Plan for the City of Mounds View.
• Councilmember Blanchard asked if there would be any advantage
in tabling this. item for two weeks to let the residents have an
opportunity to review the Plan.
Minetor explained that the Plan has been at the Library for one
year, but if the Council would feel a greater level of comfort by
waiting two weeks, that would be their decision.
Councilmember Rickaby stated that she'd like to make a point of order
• at this time. Rickaby stated as she remembered, this Plan had been
adopted back last February contingent upon it being approved by Rice
Creek Watershed District. Rickaby stated the City Council had a
meeting on the Plan and had a vote on it and the Council already
adopted it.
Ric Minetor, Director of Public WorkslCity Engineer, clarified that the
Council's previous vote on the Surface Water Management Plan was to
approve the submittal of the Plan to the Rice Creek Watershed District.
Minetor further stated that the vote tonight makes this Surface Water
Management Plan a legal document of the City.
Rickaby further stated that Minetor's statement regarding the Plan
wasn't consistent with her memory. When the gentlemen explained the
map for surface water management, as she recalled he said-that the
365,OOO,or the big amount on the Ardan area, was for a feasibility
study and that isn't consistent with her recollection nor is it
consistent with his statement that what was shown in black is actual
work and what is shown in red was for studies. Rickaby stated that
her recollection was that was for actual work.
Minetor stated that the Ardan Avenue Feasibility Study was adapted
by the Council approximately three years ago.
Mayor Linke assured Councilmember Rickaby that the amount was not
for study.
unds View City Council Page Four
~gular Meeting February 10, 1992
MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Blanchard to adopt Resolution No. 4186
Adopting a Surface Water Management Plan for the City of
Mounds View
4 ayes 1 nay Motion Carried
Councilmember Rickaby stated at this time she would like to explain
why she voted against the adoption of this resolution. Rickaby
stated that her explanation at this time was the same as her explana-
tion given the last time that she was under the impression that the
Council had adopted the Plan. Rickaby stated that back last February
the Council had considerable discussion of this issue. Rickaby further
stated that this Plan, in her opinion, the goal intended by the
legislature and verbalized by Ric and some of the documents was to
reduce the amount of surface water that was leaving the City. This
Plan did not accomplish that goal, in fact, a number of the projects
that were part of the Plan will actually increase the amount of water
leaving the City through our drainage system and for that reason
Rickaby stated she believed it was not a good plan and a lot of what
was put into this plan as far as future projects, although I know
it would be said these are not placed in cement and the City does
not have to follow the future project plan, I know the way the
• plan works, once adopted it is very likely to go through and the
City would then have reason to say this is what you wanted to do
and this is what we are going to do. Rickaby also stated that
once adopted these items are hard to amend. Rickaby stated that the
City can't afford this so the next step would be to get financing
through a utility. The City has too much on utility financing
already and for that reason Councilmember Rickaby stated she did not
approve of this plan.
2. Samantha Orduno, City Administrator, reviewed Staff Report No. 92-
171 regarding and stated that a recent review of the City's fees
and license schedule indicated a need to revise the fee structure
to be more consistent with comparable Metropolitan area fees.
Orduno stated that prior to approving a new fee. and license
structure, it is necessary to hold a public hearing. Orduno asked
that the Council set a public hearing on this matter for March 23,
1992 at 7:05 p.m.
MOTION SECOND: Quick/Rickaby to set a public hearing for
Monday, March 23, 1992 at 7:05 p.m. to Consider Changes
In City Licenses and Fee Structure
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
3. Mary Saarion, Director of Parks, Recreation and Forestry reviewed
Staff Report No. 92-172C regarding Resolution No. 4182 In Support
of Special Legislation Facilitating the Creation of a Multi-
Jurisdictional Senior Center. Saarion stated that this resolution
-~unds View City Council Page Five
~gular Meeting February 10, 1992
was being offered as support to accompany the bill for legislative
action, to show a united front by all four participating cities.
Each city was asked to sign a resolution to be attached to the
legislation as it is considered by the committees.
MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Wuori to adopt Resolution No. 4182 In
Support of Special Legislative Facilitating the Creation of
a Multi-Jurisdictional Senior Center
Councilmember Rickaby stated that philosophically she is generally
opposed to something like this that is undemocratic and does not give
the people enough voice as to haw money is being spent. Rickaby stated
that the committee came in and did a very good selling job with their
enthusiasm for this project and she stated she also understood that
this does not commit the City to spend its money this way. Rickaby
stated she won't oppose it but further stated she does not like to
operate in this fashion.
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
4. Samantha Orduno, City Administrator, reviewed Staff Report No.
91-173C regarding Resolution No. 4187 Authorizing Expenditure to
• Conduct a Community Service Survey. Orduno stated that at the
Council's February 3 Work Session, Decision Resources, Ltd., presented
a proposal to conduct a 400 random sample telephone community survey
at a cost of $5800. Orduno further stated that the plan to conduct
the survey is in response to the requests from residents and Mounds.
View taxpayers that the Council examine City services and determine
areas for continuance at current levels, reductions and/or total
eliminations.
Orduno stated that the purpose of the survey is to determine the
level, scope and specifics of resident approval/disapproval of current
and future City service levels. Orduno also stated that the data will
be invaluable in setting 1993 budget priorities.
Orduno explained that the expenses are not a 1992 budgeted item and,
therefore, necessitates a budget change of monies from the Contingency
Fund to the City Hall Professional Services Fund.
MOTION/SECOND: Wuori/Quick to adopt Resolution No. 4187
Authorizing Expenditure to Conduct a Community Service
Survey
Councilmember Rickaby stated she was against this survey for
one thing because the Council has had a number of citizens who have
come to Council Meetings and informed themselves with regards to the
budget and offered to study the budget and make recommendations to the
City. Rickaby stated the Council ignored this offer and tended to say
unds View City Council Page Six
~gular Meeting February 10, 1992
that this Decision Resources survey is more reliable than what people
say to the Council as they come to the Council Meetings. Rickaby
further stated that one of these particular surveys indicated that the
geople who were well informed tended to have a negative response to
some of the projects proposed by the city and the Council shouldn't
discount what people are saying when more well informed. Rickaby
stated that she has been opposed to some of Decision Resources past
surveys because they tended to not give us much information on what
was being asked. Rickaby stated they would ask something but would
not indicate what the financial consequences would be. Rickaby
stated that this survey would be better because they will give the
people some information about financial costs, however, she stated
the City doesn't need to spend $5,000 when it should be cutting back.
• Mayor Linke rebutted Councilmember Rickaby's comments. Mayor Linke
stated that the Council has not ignored the citizens who volunteered
to study the budget as the Council is not in a budget process at this
time. Mayor Linke also felt that the Council needed more
representation than input from 10 families. Linke stated that the
survey would include 400 random samplings.
Councilmember Wuori stated that at the time of the last survey the
• questions weren't geared toward the budget. Wuori stated that many
of the residents have stated that they would like to have the taxes
lowered but no services cut. This survey will indicate what cuts the
citizens feel can be made and what services can be done with our
without.
Alice Frits, 8072 Long Lake Road asked if the surveyors would tell
the people what options such as a skating rink and what it
costs to maintain and then the citizen could decide.
Orduno stated some examples of services savings, i.e.,
mowing the parks only once every other week instead of once per
week. How much would this save the City? Could some of these types
of services be cut? The surveying individual could indicate to
the person what delivery costs would be.
Orduno further stated that most residents don't have a clue as to what
things costs and they .also don't realize that there is a domino or
ripple effect when services are cut.
Alice Frits, 8072 Long Lake Road asked if the entire Council felt that
it is economical at this time to spend $5800 to .call the residents or
form a committee and use it to do the work free of charge?
Mayor Linke stated that the City will receive better diversity of needs
and wants in the City if the survey were taken from 400 random selected
persons. than of 10 or 12.
unds View City Council
~gular Meeting
Page Seven
February 10, 1992
Samantha Orduno, City Administrator, stated that this type of sampling
will give a better representation. There were only 42 persons at the
December 9 Budget Hearing. Orduno stated that 42 from a City of
13,000 is not an adequate accounting. Orduno further stated that
as far as establishing a budget, the general public elected this
Council to accomplish this.
4 ayes 1 nay Motion Carried
5. Michele Severson, Deputy Clerk, reviewed Staff Report no. 92-174C
regarding Resolution No. 4183 Creating a Single Polling Place
Designation for the Presidential Primary Election on April 7, 1992.
• Severson stated that the City of Mounds View was not affected by
the state and federal mandates regarding redistricting. Severson
further stated that at the time of redistricting, however, it would be
a good time to look at precinct boundaries and overall election
procedures to determine if there would be a way to cut expenses.
Severson determined that by moving to a single polling place
designation there would be a reduction in salaries as less judges
would be needed, a reduction in printing costs and a reduction in
staff time for the administration election personnel.
S Severson indicated that the Presidential Primary could be used
as a model as to how the City of Mounds View could become a
single precinct in the future. Severson explained that this
would even further decrease expenditures to the City regarding
elections.
MOTION/SECOND: Adopt Resolution No. 4183 Creating a Single
Polling Place Designation for the Presidential Primary
Election on April 7, 1992 in the City of Mounds View
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Samantha Orduno, City Administrator, commented that staff
approached her with ways to cut city costs regarding elections.
Orduno also stated that moving into the single polling place
designation could cut election costs by 25 to 30 percent.
Orduno further stated that staff is making every effort to
cut .costs.
6. Ric Minetor, Director of Public Works/City Engineer reviewed
Staff Report No. 92-175C regarding city hall improvements.
Minetor indicated that he had reviewed the suggestions for
arranging the Administrative Office Area. Minetor stated that
he had some additional measurements taken for carpeting
including the Park and Recreation office area. Minetor also
stated there were some requests for insulating exterior walls
where possible prior to the carpeting being installed. Additionally,
unds View City Council Page Eight
~gular Meeting February 10, 1992
window blinds in the office areas currently without window treatments
and some office furniture were included in the estimate. The total
estimated cost is $20,875.
Minetor stated that in the short time available for this project, it
is not possible to arrive at exact dollar costs. Minetor further
stated that he attempted to be conservative, but suggested that
a small amount of contingency be included. Minetor believes that the
total cost of this work should not exceed $23,000.
Minetor explained that he had not included any mechanical system
upgrades or major equipment replacements. Minetor stated that
at this time it would be nearly impossible to determine these
needs. Minetor did indicate that some changes to the heating
and cooling systems will be necessary.
Councilmember Wuori stated that some of the items being taken
care of need to be taken care of as general maintenance and upkeep.
Sheetrock and insulation would help with the air conditioning and
heating. The area downstairs with a room temperature of 60 degrees is
uncomfortable to work an eight hours shift in.
Mayor Linke stated that in his day to day position his responsibility
is to do layouts for offices and shopping centers. Mayor Linke state
that for the functionality of the office space is excellent, especial
by taking out the half wall. Linke stated there is a four foot aisle
on both sides of the wall and by removing it you would save space.
Mayor Linke further stated that the carpet has not been changed since
the building was built.
Minetor further stated that the City could not take on the
heat and air conditioning because they are beyond doing with
our own labor.
MOTION/SECOND: Blanchard/ Rickaby to authorize expenditures
not to exceed $23,000 to rearrange and recarpet the general
office and Parks and Recreation office areas to be charged to
the City Hall improvement fund.
d
ly
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
7. Samantha Orduno, City Administrator, reviewed Staff Report No.
92-176C Urging the 1992 Minnesota State Legislature to Pass
Legislation which Restores the Integrity of the Local Government
Trust Fund. Orduno stated that in January, 1992, the Minnesota House
of Representatives failed to override the governor's veto which would
have secured the future distribution of Local government aid to
cities through the 1991 Local Government Trust Fund. Orduno stated that
as a result of the override failure, a provision does not exist to
provide distribution of aid to cities through the Trust Fund in the
unds View City Council Page Nine
~gular Meeting February 10, 1992
next biennium. Orduno further stated that without new legislation
which would sanction a new distribution formula and restore the
Trust Fund for aid to cities, the opportunity exists for the State
to raid the Trust Fund to balance its over extended budget.
Orduno also stated that the League of Minnesota has requested passage
of a resolution which urges legislators to restore the same aid
distribution provisions from the 1991 omnibus tax bill
(Councilmember Quick left the meeting at 8:03 p.m.)
MOTION/SECOND: Wuori/Blanchard to adopt Resolution No. 4188
Urging the 1992 Minnesota State Legislature to Pass Legisla-
. ture to Pass Legislation which Restores the Integrity of the
Local Government Trust Fund and Gives Minnesota Cities "Their
Two Cents:
4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
(Councilmember Quick rejoined the meeting at 8:05 p.m.)
8. Ric Minetor, Director of Public Works/City Engineer reviewed
• Staff .Report No. 92-179C Regarding Easement Acquisition for
Ramsey County's Long Lake Road Reconstruction Project. Minetor
stated that he reviewed the right-of-way plans for the reconstruction
of Long Lake Road. Minetor stated that there are 121 temporary
easements required for matching driveways, matching slopes and
other minor intrusions onto adjacent property. Minetor further
stated that there are 22 permanent easements required, these are
primarily adjacent to drainage structures, such as curb inlets
and pipe outlets.
Minetor stated that the main issue was the storm water treatment
cell. Minetor further stated that the issue is whether the owner,
Keith Harstad, will ask for payment for the permanent easement
necessary to construct the proposed facility. Minetor explained
that Mr. Harstad is out of town and won't be returning until
February 23. Minetor also explained that the number of contacts
required and the need for appraisals for the permanent easement is
very time consuming. Minetor stated that he has discussed the
option of retaining a firm to provide legal descriptions,
appraisals and negotiations with other cities. Minetor states that
Roseville indicated that they have contracted with Evergreen Land
Services in the past to provide this service and have been very
pleased with the services provided as well as the cost.
Minetor asked the Council authorization to negotiate a
contract for Council approval on the 24th of February, 1992.
unds View City Council Page Ten
lar Meeting February 10, 1992
MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Wuori to authorize the Director
of Public Works negotiate a contract for Council approval
on February 24, 1992
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
9. Ric Minetor, Director of Public Works/City Engineer reviewed
Setting Public Hearings for Saturn Car Dealership and A Planned
Unit Development for Mounds View Business Park for February 24
at 7:05 p.m. and 7:10 p.m. respectively. Minetor stated that
the Planning Commission at their February 5, 1992 meeting, requested by
motion that the City Council set public hearing dates at their
February 10 meeting for the above referenced items. Minetor
stated that this request was made in response to the applicants
request that any actions which could be taken to expedite the
processing of the applications be considered. Minetor further stated
that recommendations from the Planning Commission on these two items
will be provided to the Council prior to the public hearing date.
MOTION/SECOND: Blanchard/Rickaby to Set Public Hearings
for Monday, February 24, 1992 at 7:05 and at 7:10 for Saturn
Car Dealership and A Planned Unit Development for Mounds
View Business Park South
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
REPORT OF COUNCILMEMBERS
Councilmember Wuori - Congratulated the Finance Department for
a top .notch jab and commented on the number of plaques on the wall in
the Council Chambers received as Budget Awards.
Councilmember Ouick - No report.
Councilmember Blanchard - No report.
Councilmember Rickaby - Commended Michele Severson for work she
accomplished on doing some research on ways to save money regarding
elections. Commended Don Brager on his receipt of the 1991 Budget
Award. Commended staff for recommending refurbishment of City Hall
rather than the expensive expansion project that the budget would
not be able to handle at this time.
REFORT OF MAYOR LINKE
Mayor Linke stated that he had been appointed to the Ramsey
County Local Government Services Study Commission to study possible
consolidation or cooperation efforts. This Commission was looking
unds View City Council Page Eleven
~gular Meeting February 10, 1992
at the consolidation of police services, public works services, health
services and libraries.
The St. Paul and Ramsey County Libraries will not merge but
will look at a regional system which would be a seven county
system.
Health Services - Both Ramsey County and St. Paul have Health
Departments. There is no duplication of services.
Police - the one area that was looked
communication or special needs such as
SWAT teams. This will be left as is.
St. Paul have SWAT teams and canine un
times are doing patrol duty and it was
evening that there would be no savings
at for merging was
canine units and
Ramsey County and
its that on off
the feeling that
to combine.
Ramsey County and St. Paul Communications Group should merge.
For everyone to be involved, a Joint Powers Agreement should
be considered. Cities could then opt out.
Public works to do whatever can be done to save
money. One. of the things being done is to turn back
state roads or to reclassify roads which would be to
turn roads back to counties and cities and those roads
would be maintained by the individual cities or counties.:
Each city will be handled individually and public hearings
for roads affecting the City would be held. Where a problem may
exist is if Mounds View, for instance, has a county road and in
Shoreview it is a city road.
Mayor Linke stated there will be a meeting of this Commission
at 7:00 p.m. on Wednesday, February 12, 1992 in Room 10 of the Senate
Office Building. Public officials will have an opportunity to talk
about last week's votes and to ratify votes made that week. A final
report will be prepared to go to the Legislature by the 15th.
REPORT OF ADMINISTRATOR:
1. Thanked Councilmember Rickaby for comments made regarding the
staff. Orduno stated that it is nice to be appreciated.
Orduno stated that this staff has an eye for coming up with
ways to save money. Orduno stated she has worked in a number
of cities and this staff is the best.
2. Orduno reminded everyone that the Appreciation Dinner is
February 22nd and it is a good time to appreciate the
volunteers, staff and commission members.
unds View City Council Page Eleven
~gular Meeting February 10, 1992
Mayor Linke stated that in the past it was an Appreciation Dinner but now,
in order to save costs, it would be hors d'oeuvres instead of dinner, a
short program and dancing to the music of the Whitesidewalls all for a cost
of $10.00. Mayor Linke urged everyone to come in and get tickets and prepare
to have a good time.
Orduno commented that this Appreciation Dinner is being organized strictly
by volunteers.
REPORT OF ATTORNEY
Mayor Linke made note that the City Attorney was not in attendance this
vening. Mayor Linke explained that the City Attorney will only be
~t meetings where there is an issue that would need his expertise. This has
been done as a means to save money as the City Attorney is paid by the hour.
If the City Attorney isn't present at a certain time when his expertise
would be needed, the item could always be tabled to another meeting.
Mayor Linke announced that the next Regular Council Meeting would be
February 24, at 7:00 p.m. and that the next Council Work Session would be
March 2 at 7:00 p.m.
JOURNMENT
There being no further business before the Council, Mayor Linke adjourned
the meeting at 8:21 p.m.
Respectfully submted,
r
le Sever~s`on
v Clerk
•