HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - 1992/07/27•
r
_ CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
CITY COUNCIL
JULY 27, 1992
7:00 P.M.
AGENDA
The City Council is provided background information for agenda items in
• advance by staff and appointed commissions, committees and boards.
Decisions are based on this information, as well as City policy and
practices, input from constituents and a Councilmember's personal
judgement. If you have comments, questions or information regarding an
item on the agenda, please step forward to be recognized by the Mayor
during the "Residents Requests and Comments From the Floor" item on the
agenda. Please state your name and address for the record. AZZ comments
are appreciated. A copy of all printed materials relating to the agenda
item is available for public inspection at the Recording Secretary's Table.
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
3. ROLL CALL - Linke
Rickaby Blanchard
Quick Wuori
4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: July 13, 1992
Regular Meeting
COUNCIL ACTION: A T D
•
AGENDA
PAGE-TWO
JULY 27, 1992
5. SPECIAL ORDER OF BUSINESS:
A. Adoption and Presentation of Resolution No. 4257
Commending Peter Szurek for Re-finishing Woodcrest
Park Building ,
COUNCIL ACTION:
B. Adoption and Presentation of Resolution No. 4256
Commending Bryan Rife for the Construction of a
Landscape Border Around the Horseshoe Courts at
Silver View Park
COUNCIL ACTION:
C. Update on Long Lake Road Project
6. RESIDENTS REQUESTS AND COMMENTS FROM THE FLOOR
•
Citizens' comments are encouraged to allow individual citizens to address
the Council, as a whole, on a matter of interest or concern to the
citizens. The preservation of the Citizens' Comments item on the agenda is
important in order to encourage and maintain this information flow. To
preserve and protect this valuable 'communications Zink, a speaker is •
limited to three (3) minutes.
-------------------------------------------------------------
CITIZENS: BEFORE SPEARING PLEASE GIVE YOUR FULL
NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE MINUTES
-------------------------------------------------------------
7. PUBLIC HEARINGS•
7;05 p.m. - To consider a Request for a Conditional
Use Permit to Allow a Residential Dog
Kennel at 8261 Red Oak Drive, Planning
Case No. 338-91, Staff Report 92-325C
- Consideration of Resolution No.
4260, Request for Conditional Use
Permit to Allow a Residential Dog
Kennel at 8261 Red Oak Drive
COUNCIL ACTION: A T D
Comments:
•
AGENDA
a.
PAGE THREE
JULY 27, 1992
7:10 p.m. - To consider a Request for a Conditional
Use Permit to Allow a Residential Dog
Kennel at-5200 Jeffrey Drive, Planning '
Case No. 339-91, Staff Report No. 92-326C
- Consideration of Resolution No.
4261, Request for Conditional Use
Permit to Allow a Residential Dog ~~~~ ~,~:v~
Kennel at ~8~-2-6z~ed-9u~-ai .r.t 5 2 ~v '"~'~
COUNCIL ACTION: A T D
Comments•
7:15 p.m. - To consider a Request for a Conditional
Use Permit to Allow an Oversized Accessory
Structure at 7074 Knollwood Drive,
Planning Case No. 347-92, Staff Report No.
92-327C
- Consideration of Resolution No. 4262,
Request for Conditional Use Permit
to Allow an Oversized Accessory
Structure at 7074 Knollwood Drive
COUNCIL ACTION: A T D
Comments:
7:20 p.m. - To consider the First Reading of the 1992
Long Term Financial Plan, Staff Report No.
92-328C
COUNCIL ACTION: A T D
Comments:
•
AGENDA
PAGE FOUR
JULY 27, 1992
8. CONSENT AGENDA:
A. Set Public Hearing for 7:05 p.m., August 10, 1992
for Consideration of a Conditional.Use Permit for
an Oversized Accessory Building, 2454 County Road H2
Staff Report No. 92-329C
B. Adopt Resolution No. 4258 Authorizing the Purchase
of a Plain Paper Fax Machine, Staff Report No. 92-
330C
C. Adopt Resolution No. 4264 Designating a Portion of
the Fund Balance of the General Fund, Staff Report
No. 92-331C
D. Adopt Resolution No. 4259 Approving Just and Correct
Claims Against City Funds
E. Licenses for Approval
Sewer and Water - Expires 6j30/93
Northern Plumbing and Heating, Inc. - New
Larson Plumbing, Inc. - Renewal
Asuhalt - Expires 6!30192
Northern Asphalt, Inc. - Renewal
.COUNCIL ACTION: A T D
Comments•
9. COUNCIL BUSINESS:
A. Discussion of Request by Mounds View Antiques to
Allow Off-Site Signage, Staff Report No. 92-332C
COUNCIL ACTION: A T D
Comments:
•
AGENDA
PAGE FIVE
JULY 27, 1992
B. Consideration of Resolution No. 4265 Approving
the Final Plat for Harstad Companies, Staff Report
No. 92-333C
COUNCIL ACTION: A T D .
Comments•
C. Consideration of Resolution No. 4263 Approving the
Transfer of Ownership of North Central Cable
Communications Corporation, Staff Report No. 92-334C
COUNCIL ACTION: A T D
Comments•
D. Consideration of Setting a Public Hearing for 7:05
p.m., August 24, 1992 to Consider an Ordinance
Approving an Electrical Energy Franchise Agreement
with Northern States Power (NSP), Staff Report No.
92-335C
COUNCIL ACTION: A T D
Comments•
E. Consideration of Setting a Public Hearing for 7:10
p.m., August 24, 1992 to Consider an Ordinance
Approving a Gas Energy Franchise Agreement with
Northern States Power (NSP), Staff Report No.
92-336C
COUNCIL ACTION: A T D
Comments•
•
AGENDA
PAGE SIX •
JULY 27, 1992
F. Consideration of Setting a Public Hearing for 7:15
p.m., August 24, 1992 to Consider an Ordinance
Implementing a Franchise Fee on Gas and Electric
Utilities, Staff Report No. 92-3370
COUNCIL ACTION: A T D
Comments•
G. Consideration of Designating the St. Paul Pioneer
Press as the City's Second Legal Paper, Staff Report
No. 92-338C
COUNCIL ACTION: A T D
Comments•
•
10. REPORTS•
1. Report of Councilmembers: Rickaby, Quick,
Blanchard, Wuori
2. Report of Mayor Linke
3. Report of Administrator
4. Report of Staff
5. Report of Attorney
11. ADJOURNMENT•
NE%T COIINCIL WORK SESSION: AIIGIIST 3, 1992
NEST COIINCIL MEETING: AIIGIIST 10, 1992
•
•
PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA
Regular Meeting
July 27, 1992
Mounds View City Hall
2401 Hwy. 10, Mounds View, MN 55112
CALL TO ORDER
~he Mounds View City Council was called to order by Mayor Linke at 7:00 p.m.
n Monday, July 27, 1992.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The Pledge of Allegiance was said.
ROLL CALL
MEMBERS PRESENT: Councilmembers Rickaby, Blanchard, Quick,
Wuori and Mayor Linke.
MEMBERS ABSENT: None
ALSO PRESENT: Samantha Orduno, City Administrator, Ric Minetor,
Public Works Director/City Engineer, Paul
Harrington, City Planner
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
MOTION/SECOND: Rickaby/Blanchard to approve July 13, 1992 minutes
as amended.
Councilmember Rickaby made a correction to the vote on page 18 and to
the vote on page 21 making each of them read 4 ayes and 1 nay.
VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
ounds View City Council
~egular Meeting
Page Two
July 27, 1992
SPECIAL ORDER OF BUSINESS:
MOTION1SECOND: Linke/Quick to adopt Resolution No. 4257 Commending
Peter Szurek for Refinishing Woodcrest Park Building
Mayor Linke read Resolution No. 4257 Commending Peter Szurek for
Refinishing the Woodcrest Park Building.
VO 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Mayor Linke presented the above referenced resolution of commendation
to Peter Szurek and thanked him on behalf of the residents of the
City for his work in the repair and repainting of Woodcrest Park
building as his project-for an Eagle Scout Award.
MOTIONLSECOND: Linke/Wuori to adopt Resolution No. 4256 Commending
Bryan Rife for Construction of a Landscape Border Around the Horseshoe
Courts at Silver View Park
• Mayor Linke read Resolution No. 4256 Commending Bryan Rife for
Construction of a Landscape Border Around the Horseshoe Courts at
Silver View Park.
VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Mayor Linke presented the above referenced resolution of commendation
to Bryan Rife and thanked him on behalf of the residents of the City
for his work in the construction of a timber landscape border for the
horseshoe courts at Silver View Park.
Update on Long Lake Road Project: It was noted by Mayor Linke that
Ric Minetor, Director of Public Works/City Engineer had left work
early today because of illness. Mr. Minetor was called back to work
and is on his way in.
RESIDENTS REQUESTS AND COMMENTS FROM THE FLOOR:
Duane McCarty, 8060 Long Lake Road, asked if the Council would accept the
comments that normally would be given at this time after the Long Lake Road
Update.
Mayor Linke assured Mr. McCarty that the Council would hear the comments
from the residents after the Long Lake Road Update presentation by Ric
Minetor, Director of Public Works/City Engineer.
•
~ounds View City Council
Regular Meeting
Page Three
July 27, 1992
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
Mayor Linke opened the public hearing at 7:11 p.m. to consider a request for
a conditional use permit to allow a residential dog kennel at 8261 Red Oak
Drive.
Paul Harrington, City Planner reviewed Staff Report No. 92-325C regarding a
Conditional Use Permit to Allow the Establishment of a Residential Dog
Kennel at 8261 Red Oak Drive. Chapter 40.10 Subdivision D (4) of the Mounds
View Municipal Code allows for dog/cat kennels of not more than four (4)
animals in residential zone districts with a conditional use permit. The
applicants property is currently zoned R-1, Single Family Residential. The
application indicates that four (4) dogs will be kept on-site.
Councilmember Wuori asked where on the site the dog kennel would be located.
Harrington responded that the entire site is dealt with as the site. This
is not a kennel as we know it with a concrete slab and a fence around it.
Councilmember Rickaby asked the applicant how many barking dog complaints
~ad been received.
Mary Niezgocki, applicant, stated that on two occasions there were
complaints made. There was one complaint in 1990 and one in 1991. Both
incidents involved puppies. The applicant said she had kenneled the dogs
outside for the day and forgot to bring them in and the neighbors had a
party which upset the dogs. There have been no more complaints. There will
be four dogs at this location, two adults and two puppies. One of the adult
dogs, which was a puppy at the time of one of the barking complaints, has
been debarked and can no longer make noise. Niezgocki stated that the
person who had made the complaints had also signed the petition for the
kennel.
Mayor Linke closed the public hearing at 7:15 p.m.
MOTION/SECOND: Quick Blanchard to adopt Resolution No. 4260 Approving
a Conditional Use Permit to Allow the Establishment of a Residential
Dog Kennel at 8261 Red Oak Drive
VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion. Carried
Mayor Linke opened the public hearing at 7:16 p.m. to consider
Denying a Conditional Use Permit to Allow the Establishment of a Residential
Dog Kennel at 5200 Jeffrey Drive
~aul Harrington, City Planner, reviewed the staff report and request to deny
conditional use permit to allow a residential dog kennel at 5200 Jeffrey
Drive. Harrington stated the Planning Commission recommended denial of
ounds View City Council
~egular Meeting
Page Four
July 27, 1992
this Conditional Use Permit based upon the fact that control and restraint
of the animals continues to be a problem on the proposed kennel site.
Police reports filed on the property relating to the dogs kept on site were
attached to this report.
Harrington had received two letters that he read into the minutes
(attached). The letters were from Gary Olson, 5209 O'Connell Drive, dated
July 14, 1992, stating his opposition to the granting of the Conditional Use
Permit. The other letter was from Mark and Debbie Gavett, 5210 Jeffrey
Drive, received July 23, 1992, stating their opposition to the granting of a
Conditional Use Permit to the applicant as they already have four sheds and
a large swimming pool in their backyard (attached). The letter further
stated that the signatures obtained on the petition were from people who
lived far enough away from the property that they were not aware of the
bitings or would care about the looks or smell of the property.
LaDean Norton, 5209 Jeffrey Drive, (across from the property) stated that
there has been trouble with the dogs in the past and he was in opposition of
the granting of a residential kennel on this property.
Mark Gavett, 5210 Jeffrey Drive, stated that he has three small children and
a couple of times the bus driver had to escort the children to the door
ather than drop them off because the dogs were outside..
Mayor Linke closed the public hearing at 7:20 p.m.
Applicant was not in attendance at the Council Meeting.
MOTIONf SECOND: Wuori/Rickaby to Adopt Resolution No. 4261 to
Deny a Conditional Use Permit to Allow the Establishment of a
Residential Dog Kennel at 5200 Jeffrey Drive
VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Mayor Linke opened the public hearing at 7:21 p.m. to Consider a Request for
a Conditional Use Permit to Allow an Oversized Accessory Structure at 7074
Knollwood Drive.
Paul Harrington, City Planner, reviewed the staff report and request
regarding this oversized accessory structure to be constructed in the
applicant's rear yard. Harrington stated this request meets the City's
zoning requirements for size of structure.
Harrington read into the minutes a letter from Gordon and Shirley Johnson,
copy attached, concerning potential water runoff problems that may develop
from the roof of a building this size. A request was made by the Johnsons
that there would be adequate grading so water runoff would not be a problem
~f the request for this oversized building is granted.
ounds View City Council Page Five
~egular Meeting July 27, 1992
Harrington further stated that he was unable to get ahold of the applicant,
but he stated a grading plan could be provided and, in his opinion, the
letter was more of a concern than a criticism to deny the Conditional Use
Permit.
Pat Stampfle, applicant, stated that the grading was part of his plan and
that he would grade so the Johnsons would not have undue runoff from the
roof of this building.
Mayor Linke stated that sometimes in the past the City had asked that the
applicant remove the door so the old garage could not be used as a garage.
The Planning Commission has asked that a driveway to the existing building
be removed to assure that it is not used as a garage.
Harrington stated that old collector cars could be stored in this building,
but not a licensed vehicle.
Richard Hedin, 8040 Long Lake Road, asked what the size would be of the
oversized accessory building and what is the size of the existing building.
Harrington stated the new building would be 780 square feet and the existing
garage is 286 square feet.
~ouncilmember Rickaby asked what the existing driveway was composed of.
Stampfle stated it was blacktop.
Councilmember Rickaby stated this should help the runoff problem in that
impervious surface was being removed.
Mayor Linke closed the public hearing at 7:26 p.m.
MOTIONjSECOND: Quick/Rickaby to adopt Resolution No. 4262
Approving the Request by Patrick Stampfle for a Conditional Use
Permit to Allow An Oversized Accessory Building on Their Property
at 7074 Knollwood Drive
VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Mayor Linke opened the public hearing at 7:27 p.m. to consider the 1992 Long
Term Financial Flan.
Samantha Orduno, City Administrator, reviewed the steps taken by the City
Council in formulating the 1992 Long Term Financial Plan and its use in the
budgetary process. Orduno stated that there had been Council Work Sessions
in June and July with regard to this Plan and that a copy of the document
has been in City Hall for public review. Orduno explained that this
~ocument is used as a window to take a look at the needs of the community
ver the next five years.
ounds View City Council
~egular Meeting
Page Six
July 27, 1992
Mayor Linke also stated that this document is not cast in concrete and that
it can change. This plan looks at future needs but sometimes changes.
Mayor Linke closed the public hearing at 7:29 p.m.
MOTION/SECOND: Wuori/Blanchard to accept the first reading of
Ordinance No. 513 Adopting the 1992 Long Term Financial Plan
and waive the reading.
VO E: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Mayor Linke stated that the second reading would be scheduled
for the next regularly scheduled Council Meeting.
CONSENT AGENDA
Mayor Linke introduced the Consent Agenda. Samantha Orduno, City
Administrator, read the Consent Agenda.
MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Wuori to adopt the Consent Agenda as
presented.
VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
COUNCIL BUSINESS:
A. Paul Harrington reviewed Staff Report No. 92-321C regarding
a Request by Mounds View Antiques to Allow Off-Site Signage.
Mounds View Antiques is requesting Council approval for the location of
a sign on property other than that upon which their business is
being conducted. Harrington stated that the Minnesota Rental Sign
exceeds square footage as our code is written, but some of their signs
predate our ordinance.
Councilmember Blanchard asked if the applicant was in the
audience. Applicant was not in attendance. Councilmember Blanchard
stated that this item could not be worked on because the Council did
not have complete information as to the size and location of the
sign being requested.
Councilmember Wuori stated that if their signs exceed requirements,
at this time the signs be brought up to code.
Councilmember Blanchard stated that the Sands Apartments requested
signage that exceeded the code and would be placed on someone else's
property and was turned down by a previous Council.
Paul Harrington, City Planner, stated that there was no history that
could be found of the City allowing this signage.
ounds View City Council
~egular Meeting
Page Seven
July 27, 1992
Mayor Linke asked the Councilmembers if they would be okay with holding
off on this item until near the end of the meeting. The item would not
be officially tabled. The applicant may have assumed the meeting would
be long like the last meeting and would come later.
Councilmember Wuori stated she had no problem with moving the item to
later if some action were formally taken before the end of the meeting.
Ric Minetor, Director of Public Works/City Engineer, joined the meeting at
approximately 8:00 p.m.
Mayor Linke asked Mr. Minetor at this time to present his update on Long
Lake Road. Mayor Linke stated there were some residents in the audience who
had concerns with what size the sidewalk would be.
Minetor stated the following with regards to Long Lake Road:
Williams Pipeline Company will put new pipeline from
County Road H to south of County Road J. The pipeline
will be placed three feet within the right-of-way which
will improve safety conditions. The pipe should be
delivered this week and Williams will begin this week or
• next.
Northern States Power (gas) is behind schedule as they have just
begun work.
Until Williams Pipeline and Northern States Power finish
the utility work Schaeffer Construction, general road contractor,
can't begin their work. Schaeffer will not begin their work for
two to three weeks. This is a two year project. Some work will
be done this summer and some next summer. The County Road H2 and
County Road I watermain crossing on Highway 10 is scheduled to be
put in this year.
The plans approved and bid on are for a 7' sidewalk. The
7' sidewalk would be on the west side of Long Lake Road.
Normally when sidewalks are installed they are 5' wide
on both sides of the road. With the sidewalk only on wide
side the extra width is needed for safety purposes with
bicycles and walkers. 7' is only two feet wider than the
standard sidewalk.
Duane McCarty, 8060 Long Lake Road, stated that he objects to the
7' wide sidewalk. Most of the neighbors that he has spoken to
don't have a problem with the sidewalk. Mr. McCarty indicated that
his wife is in favor of the sidewalk, infact. Mr. McCarty stated
he understands that for maintenance and equipment the width is
needed. Mr. McCarty stated that he knows this Council will not be
around forever and if the next Council comes in and chooses to no
ounds View City Council
~egular Meeting
Page Eight
July 27, 1992
longer maintain the sidewalks (snow removal) the homeowner would
have or pay the consequences. A 5' sidewalk is wide enough to shovel.
Mr. McCarty also stated that he has concerns with removing some of
the old trees that are 30 and 40 years old. Removing the old trees
will remove much of the ambience of the boulevards on Long Lake Road.
Mr. McCarty asked the Council to revisit the entire subject.
Mayor Linke asked what the sidewalk width was on Long Lake Road
in New Brighton.
Minetor stated he thought it was either 5' or 6', but he wasn't
certain.
Richard Hedin, 8040 Long Lake Road, asked why the City had to
put in a 7' sidewalk when they could widen the road and put in
a bicycle lane and then add a standard sidewalk and there would not be
as many trees lost. Mr. Hedin has planted approximately 50 on his own
lot. Mr. Hedin stated that they add to the beauty of the neighborhood.
Mayor Linke stated that by making the sidewalk 5' and not 7' it
would not save that many more trees.
Mr. Hedin stated that most kids will ride on the road, not on
the sidewalk. The speed limit on that road is 30 miles per hour
because of the kids that ride bikes on that road. There are a
lot of children on Long Lake Road. At night, it sounds like a
dragstrip. Mr. Hedin suggested to keep the speed limit at 30 and
police it a little heavier on weekends and evenings to keep down
the traffic. Mr. Hedin stated, in his opinion, a 7' sidewalk is
stupid.
Minetor stated the east side of the road cannot be reduced because of
the pipeline. Minetor stated that he and the City Forester went out
and looked at all the tree sites in question. Even if the sidewalk was
reduced to 5', 2' wouldn't save trees.
Minetor further stated that if a bike lane were put in, Long
Lake Road would become no parking on the bike lane and the width would
have to be increased by 4'. Many children do ride in the street, but
in his opinion, he doesn't feel it's safe on a collector street.
Minetor stated that he agreed with the residents. There are
many nice trees along Long Lake Road. Minetor stated that he
and the Forester did what they could to save what trees they
could. Many trees on the east side have to be removed so that
Williams Pipeline can dig with a backhoe. The trees would have
to be trimmed back 20' and in some cases this wouldn't leave much
of a tree. Also from the liability aspect, these trees could blow
over in a storm with half of their root base cut off.
ounds View City Council
~egular Meeting
Page Nine
July 27, 1992
Minetor stated by adjusting the sidewalk, possibly two more trees may
be saved.
Mayor Linke asked if they had met with the residents and explained
the situation to them.
Minetor stated that they had met with as many residents who came
in or called.
Mayor Linke stated that the Forester is in on Tuesdays. Any
resident who has special problems should contact Ric to set up
a meeting and go over their individual case.
Dave Lawrence, 8530 Long Lake Road asked what the white x's were
on the trees.
Minetor stated that these are trees that, in the beginning, looked
like they could be saved. It was determined, however, that these trees
have to be taken because of Williams Pipeline.
Minetor explained the requirements regarding the shifting of the
center line of the roadway.
• Dave Lawrence could understand sidewalks on Quincy and County Road I
as they are busy roads.
Councilmember Wuori stated that Long Lake Road is also a busy road.
Councilmember Wuori also stated that where there are sidewalks in the
City they are being heavily used.
Dave Lawrence stated that the trees that would be cut around will
reroot in two years.
Minetor stated that a reason for not doing this is liability.
One concern is that a tree that had been severely trimmed could go
through a house during a storm. The tree being discussed
would have to be trimmed back 20' and this would not leave much
of a tree.
Mr. Lawrence stated that his white pine is 35 to 40 years old.
and it could go up to 50. Mr. Lawrence stated that the City could
have the other pines as he does not want to loose them either.
Minetor stated that in a natural location that tree could grow
up to 50'. The Forester indicated it would not be a good idea
to try to save it.
Mr. Lawrence stated that if the tree dies, he will cut it down.
ounds View City Council
~egular Meeting
Page Ten
July 27, 1992
Minetor stated that when a tree dies due to a project, government
usually ends up removing the dead tree.
Mayor Linke stated that Mr. Lawrence should meet with Ric Minetor
and the City Forester. Minetor stated that there would have to
be a complete waiver of liability if the tree would be left
standing with one half of the roots cut off. Mayor Linke stated
that Mr. Lawrence should give Ric his name, phone number and
address.
Councilmember Blanchard asked Ric Minetor, if after talking to
the homeowners, are most of the homeowners adamant about keeping trees?
Minetor stated that most of the residents understand the reasoning
behind the tree removal.
Sharon Croon, 8475 Eastwood Road, stated she and her husband
were not informed of what was going on with Long Lake Road. They
received no letter in the spring. Stakes appeared in her backyard and
she spoke to Jim. Jim told her not to worry until next year about the
stakes and what was going on. Then stakes appeared way into the
easement and she became very concerned. The City will not get
• her bushes. A few years back Long Lake Road took half of her
backyard. Ms. Croon understood that the City would give homeowners
$150 to use the property. She and her husband gave permission.
Ms. Croon stated that her bushes are not going and the big oak will
not go. Ms. Croon said she would blow up the place before they
could take the tree. Croon states she has a bad relationship with
Mounds View. Croon doesn't want to lose bushes or cottonwood.
Ms. Croon stated that she was told this easement would be used for
a temporary road. Mr. and Mrs. Croon gave their permission to use
their property as a construction zone. The gentleman who showed me the
plans said the sidewalk would be a 4' sidewalk. This gentleman is
telling the same thing to all the other residents. He has plans in his
truck that show a 4' sidewalk.
Minetor asked that she give him the man's name. Minetor explained
that the City had hired Evergreen Land Service: Minetor further
explained that there were two addresses that didn't receive letters,
but were sent to .the service who was doing negotiations with the
residents and were on the mailing labels.
Minetor stated that he had met with Mr. Croon and explained the
situation to him. The meeting was fairly congenial. The bushes
that Ms. Croon is referring to are planted in County right-of-way.
Minetor stated that he offered to scoop the bushes up with the front
end loader and place the bushes to the back of construction zone and
they could be replanted. Minetor further stated that .the City would
not then level the backstop. The portion of the plantings in the
right-of way will have to come out.
ounds View City Council
~egular Meeting
•
•
Page Eleven
July 27, 1992
Minetor further stated that their property would not have to be
touched if the homeowners decided they wanted nothing in their
yard bothered, however, their yard would be steeper from the
sidewalk to the property instead of a gentle slope.
Ms. Croon said that she has been taking care of this corner for
16 years and perhaps now she should charge the City of Mounds View.
Minetor stated that for the past two years a 4' sidewalk has never
been discussed.. It has always been a 7' sidewalk. Minetor again
said he would like the gentleman's name and he will talk to his
boss at Evergreen.
Mayor Linke stated this is an issue that cannot be solved tonight
but Ric should meet with the Forester, construction supervisor,
Evergreen and the Croons to come to some understanding of what is
happening.
Duane McCarty stated that the County just completed a comprehensive
plan for a bike trail system in the Metropolitan area. He would
like to trade some ideas with the system and share some expertise
on how decisions were made for this trail system.
Minetor stated Schaefer Construction will be delayed approximately 3
weeks. If they have made adjustments to their schedule, he doesn't
have any exact dates.
McCarty stated that there is a good chance that there would be enough
time for the County and the City to meet and trade information and
then perhaps hold a public informational meeting.
Nick Mosgow, 8330 Long Lake Road, who lives across from Ardan
Park, asked why the road couldn't be moved over a couple of feet
to the park side to save a few more trees.
Minetor responded that if the road is moved toward Ardan, more
trees will be lost in Ardan Park. This would be the only area
where it may be possible to look at the situation regarding
loss of trees.
Mosgow stated that most persons care more about the trees on their
own property than they do about the trees in Ardan Park.
Mayor Linke stated those trees make a good buffer and shield from the
compost center. Minetor stated there could become a concern with
regard in the curves in the roadway. Curves have to be at a minimum
radius.
ounds View City Council
~2egular Meeting
Page Twelve
July 27, 1992
Councilmember Blanchard stated that one and one half years ago
public hearings were held and maps showing what would be done were
posted in the Chambers. People didn't pay much attention at that time
because it was for something in the future. Now that it is happening
everyone is concerned.
Blanchard feels the City should again meet with the people and explain
why a 7' sidewalk is being constructed rather than a 5' sidewalk. What
width is New Brighton's sidewalk? If 7' gives more credence, if less
we can look at that too.
B. Paul Harrington reviewed Staff Report No. 92-333. (Resolution No.
4265) Harrington stated that on July 13, 1992 the City Council adopted
Resolution No. 4253 part of which approved the preliminary plat of
Greenfield Estates. Mounds View Municipal Code, Chapter 42 requires
that all major subdivisions be approved at both the preliminary and
final plat stage.
Kay Weseman, 7807 Bona Road, asked if before the Council approved
the final plat should the wetland alteration map be approved?
Paul Harrington responded that the action before the Council is
• strictly approving the major subdivision.
Mayor Linke stated that this final plat approval is approving the
property lines for each lot. The final plat approval indicates that
the developer meets the code for the type of development to be
undertaken and for "x" amount of homes to be constructed.
Paul Harrington, City Planner, explained that all other parts of the
development were approved and do not require additional action.
Harrington stated that a major subdivision requires a first reading
of the final plat. Harrington further explained that by granting
approval of the subdivision that the City isn't giving the developer
rights to build.
Kay Weseman, asked if the wetland delineation was already approved
and if the maps have the new wetland boundary and asked who the maps
were drawn by.
Ric Minetor, Director of Public Works/City Engineer, stated that the
maps showing the new wetland delineation will not be complete for
3 to 6 months. Minetor stated that the map was drawn up by the
Department of Natural Resources, the Corps of Engineers and Peter
Sabee of Barr Engineering.
Kay Weseman stated that it was her understanding that the wetland
map alteration needed to be a single item by itself with a public
hearing being held and a 4/5 vote by the Council for approval.
Mounds View City Council
~2egular Meeting
Page Thirteen
July 27, 1992
Weseman did not understand that this could be done as part of a
package.
Mayor Linke stated that many times these development items are
combined. Mayor Linke explained the process to Ms. Weseman and
of how some things on a resolution need 4/5 vote while others do
not and, therefore, some things could be approved while others
in the same proposed resolution might not be. Mayor Linke stated
that this type of process had been used with Sysco and Mounds View
Business Park South.
Kay Weseman asked the City Council to reconsider the approval of
the development. Weseman stated that a Councilmember at a previous
meeting even stated concern with people having a wetland in their
backyard. Weseman used an example of the upset residents tonight
not knowing that there were County easements in their yard so they
planted trees and bushes and now the City is coming in and taking
them.
Duane McCarty, stated that he missed some of the nuances at the
public hearing held on this subject and he had an interest in the
City Charter and the Wetland Ordinance. Mr. McCarty wanted
clarification that the Wetland Preservation Map was amended by a
4/5 vote by resolution. Mr. McCarty felt that the Wetland
Ordinance could only be changed by ordinance. McCarty stated
the City should have this looked into by the City Attorney..
Samantha Orduno, City Administrator, stated that in an off-the-
cuff conversation with the City Attorney earlier today this issue
came up. It was the City Attorney's opinion that the ordinance
could be changed by resolution if the resolution were proposing the
entire development by a 4/5 vote. Orduno stated that the 4/5 vote
was the important factor. The City Attorney is going to look into
this further and get back to the City.
Ric Minetor quoted a section of the code which stated that the code
does not require an ordinance to change the map, but a 4/5 majority
vote.
Mayor Linke stated that the City will get a legal opinion.
Kay Weseman stated her concern with the fact that the persons. who
received the Greenfield Estates Proposal for Development flyer did
not understand that the City was going to make a major change to a
wetland boundary. Weseman stated that perhaps in the future the
City Council could do this by holding a separate public hearing and
giving notice.
Councilmember Rickaby stated that she has concerns with allowing
persons to have wetlands in their yard and allowing them to build
ounds View City Council
~tegular Meeting
Page Fourteen
July 27, 1992
on them. Rickaby described a couple of scenarios that happened in the
City as a result of persons building on wetlands or non-stable soil
too close to a wetland.
MOTIONJ: Rickaby to Deny the Final Plat Approval for Harstad Companies.
Motion failed due to lack of a second.
MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Linke to approve Final Plat for Harstad
Companies.
4 ayes 1 nay Motion Carried
C. Samantha Orduno, City Administrator, reviewed Staff Report No.
92-334C regarding the transfer of ownership of the North Central
Cable Communications Corporation. Orduno stated that the attached
resolution must adopt to give formal approval of the proposed
transfer of ownership of North Central Cable Communications
Corporation to Meredith/New Heritage Strategic Partners. The
transfer of ownership has been approved by the North Suburban Cable
Commission and is now dependent upon the approval of all participating
cities. Orduno stated that also attached to this resolution is the
Commission's Attorney's opinion on the sale. According the
Commission the sale will not fundamentally change the current status
of cable operations or increase the cost of cable subscriptions.
MOTION/SECOND: Rickaby/Blanchard to Adopt Resolution No. 4263
Approving the Transfer of Ownership of North Central Cable
Communications Corporation
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
D. Samantha Orduno, City Administrator reviewed Staff Report No.
92-335C regarding the setting of a public hearing for August 24,
1992 at 7:05 to consider an ordinance approving an electrical
energy franchise agreement with Northern States Power. Orduno
stated that last fall the City Council held a public hearing and
considered an ordinance which would establish a franchise fee of up
to 4$ on Northern States Power's gross operating gas and electric
revenues as permitted under the Franchise Agreement with NSP. A major
concern of the residents and Council was that NSP would hold the funds
collected for one year. The City under this franchise agreement would
receive the funds monthly.
The provision of the franchise allowed for NSP to collect and
retain the fee for a full year before paying the City. This
provision was a major issue of concern to residents who attended
the public hearing and members of the Council. Council directed
staff to pursue a new franchise agreement which NSP which would
provided for monthly payments of the franchise fees. All new
Mounds View City Council
.Regular Meeting
Page Fifteen
July 27, 1992
franchise fee agreements for gas and electrical energy have been
negotiated and provide for the desired payment schedule.
MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Wuori to Set a Public Hearing for 7:05 p.m.
on August 24, 1992 to Consider an Ordinance Approving an Electrical
Energy Franchise Agreement with Northern States Power.
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
E. Samantha Orduno, City Administrator, gave information in last item
to also cover this item.
MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Wuori to set a public hearing for 7:10 p.m. on
August 24, 1992, to Consider an Ordinance Approving a Gas Energy
Franchise Agreement with Northern States Power
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
F. Samantha Orduno reviewed Staff Report No. 92-337C regarding the
setting of a public hearing for 7:15 p.m. on August 24, 1992 to
consider an ordinance implementing a franchise fee on gas and
electric utilities. Orduno stated that over the past several
. years cities have experienced declining revenues due to such
factors as State cuts to Local Government Aid, reductions in
residential and commercial/industrial property tax rates, reduced
investment earnings, less construction and development resulting in
declines in permit fees and now a recession that is further
exacerbating an already dangerous situation. The consequences of
this dilemma is the move toward user fees, franchise fees and
other non-property tax revenues. A franchise fee is an example
of a user fee based revenue program imposed on a company conducting
business far profit within the City limits. The City currently
has a franchise agreement with North Central Cable. The Cable
Company conducts business in the City and for that privilege, the
company pays the City a franchise fee of 5o to be used only for the
City's municipal cable operations.
Councilmember Rickaby stated that these methods are just
property tax raises in disguise and that by doing it this way
it is an attempt to avoid the clamber of people coming in to make
comments about the City raising people's taxes. The people have the
right to these comments.
Mayor Linke stated that he takes exception to Councilmember
Rickaby's statement with regard to avoiding the clamber of people
coming to the hearings. Mayor Linke feels these franchise methods
would aid in buying down property tax increases for the homeowner.
These fees are controllable by the homeowner as they are based on
electric and gas usage. The churches and schools, who pay no taxes,
will now share in this burden. Linke stated that for many years people
Mounds View City Council
.Regular Meeting
Page Sixteen
July 27, 1992
have been coming in and he listens to them. Mayor Linke stated after
advertising the budget meetings he was hoping to see people attend,
however, no one showed up.
Councilmember Rickaby stated that this was a statement publicly made
at the meetings.
MOTION/SECOND: Wuori/Linke to approve setting a public hearing
for 7:15 p.m., August 24, 1992, to consider an ordinance implementing
a franchise fee on gas and electric utilities
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
G. Samantha Orduno, City Administrator, reviewed Staff Report No.
92-338C regarding the designation of the St. Paul Pioneer Press
as the City's Second Legal Paper. Orduno stated that it would
be advantageous for the City to have a daily paper as a back-up
to the City's weekly paper in the case that deadlines that couldn't be
accomplished in a weekly could be met by a daily paper.
Councilmember Rickaby stated that she has a problem with putting
legal notices in a daily paper because many of the residents do
• not receive daily papers. Rickaby further stated that she noticed
that she sees many more Star and Tribune boxes than she does St.
Paul Pioneer Press boxes in the area. This would require that the
residents purchase daily a daily newspaper and those who didn't
wouldn't be aware of the legal notice. The City has two local
newspapers which are free. If back-up is needed, it would make sense
to place it in the other free newspaper where more residents would read
it.
Mayor Linke stated that sometimes there is a necessity to meet a
10 day deadline and a weekly paper cannot accomplish this.
Orduno stated it is rare that the City would have to use the
back up paper, but most cities do have one..
Councilmember Wuori stated that if, inadvertently, there would be
a problem with the local paper not publishing a legal and there
is a 10 day notice period, the daily paper could run it right away
and the City could still meet its deadline. This would mean that
a public hearing or informational meeting would not have to be
postponed or rescheduled.
Orduno further stated that the City of Mounds View also receives
coverage from the St. Paul Pioneer Press and receives no coverage
from the Minneapolis Star and Tribune.
Councilmember Rickaby stated that it is a waste of money because
the St. Paul Pioneer Press would not reach all homes as the
Mounds View City Council
Regular Meeting
Page Seventeen
July 27, 1992
two local, free newspapers do. More persons would read the
two, free newspapers. This, in her opinion, is a waste of money
to the City.
MOTIONjSECOND: Wuori/Blanchard to designate the St. Paul Pioneer
Press as the City's Second Legal Paper
4 ayes
REPORT OF COUNCILMEMBERS:
I nays Motion Carried
Councilmember Rickaby - No report.
Councilmember Quick - No report.
Councilmember Blanchard had no report but asked for an update on
the licensing of Waste Management of Blaine.
Orduno responded with a general update on the fact that Waste
Management of Blaine had met with her and shared their concerns about
when the customer list would become public information. Blaine
Waste Management has contracts in other cities and those cities did
not require the list as part of their licensing requirements. Blaine
Waste Management was given a 14 day extension to submit their list
and they did submit it reluctantly.
Orduno stated that the State passes mandates on to the cities but
does not tell the City how to implement the mandate.
Orduno offered a suggestion that the City, like many of the other
cities, follow Fridley's lead and pass an ordinance requiring that
all commercial and residential properties in the city have some
form of environmentally safe collection. This ordinance. would have
to encompass the seniors who share collection and the employees
who work at landfills or wherever that dispose of their solid waste
there. Orduno stated that the City could return the customer lists
at this time and approve Waste Management of Blaine's license at the
next Council meeting so they would not be in violation of the
licensing requirement for garbage haulers and recyclers.
Councilmember Blanchard brought up the subject of peddlers
selling sweet corn. Councilmember Blanchard stated she understood
that if the corn was grown on their property they could sell it with
the property owner's permission.
Orduno stated that State Law currently requires no licensing
of peddlers selling agricultural products. If the product is
grown on the peddler's property he can sell it. .The State
does not provide the City with enforcement. Peddler's are
not required to show proof that the land is theirs. This is
Mounds View City Council
.Regular Meeting
Page Eighteen
July 27, 1992
something that will be brought up to the Legislative Committee
of the League of Minnesota Cities.
Mayor Linke brought up the peddler selling peaches and the
woman selling flowers on Silver Lake Road. There is no way
to tell if they are licensed or not unless one stops. Mayor Linke
suggested that a bright colored permit be issued to be placed on these
stands or sales locations to identify those peddlers who are licensed
by the City.
Orduno stated that this could be accomplished and staff would
work on it.
Councilmember Wuori stated that the newer gas stations, such as
Superamerica, cannot stack, store or sell anything on the blacktopped
surface. Councilmember Wuori asked if Superamerica is being warned
and if they are being ticketed for these type of sales.
Orduno assured Councilmember Wuori that this was happening.
Councilmember Wuori reported that "Camelot" opened last weekend. It
was a beautiful performance. There are seats available for Thursday,
Friday, Saturday evening, and Sunday matinee performances. Thursday
the performance will be signed for the hearing impaired.
9. A. Item postponed at beginning of meeting in hopes that the
applicant might show up for the request for signage for
Mounds View Antiques
Councilmember Quick stated that the City Council has tried
twice to handle this item.
MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Blanchard to Deny Request for Mounds View
Antiques to Allow Off-Site Signage
Councilmember Rickaby stated concerns about the requested property
being over-signed now.
Mayor Linke concurred.
Councilmember Blanchard states that the ordinance does not
allow this off-site signage.
Paul Harrington, City Planner, stated that the code allows
for special permit to be given out by the City Council for
location and size.
• 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Mounds View City Council
.Regular Meeting
Mayor Linke's Report:
Page Nineteen
July 27, 1992
1. The City Council met with Samantha Orduno, City Administrator
and conducted her performance review as per her contract with the
City. All items were satisfactory or above. Councilmember
Rickaby was not in attendance due to her employment. Council
reviewed the wage scale and would ask to fix the salary for Orduno
at $61,.229.40 commencing July 1, 1992 in accordance with her
contract.
MOTIONf SECONDi Linke/Quick to approve a wage increase for
Samantha Orduno, City Administrator, to $61,229.40 commencing July
1, 1992 in accordance with the terms of her contract with the
City.
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
2. Mayor Linke attended "Camelot". Linke stated that he has
attended for the past nine opening nights of the Mounds View
Community Theater's performances.
. Councilmember Quick stated it was a top notch production.
3. Mayor Linke stated that the Irondale Marching Knights had
participated in the Aquatennial and Torchlight parades as
well as the Lion's parade in Rochester. The band will be
marching in the National Legion's parade.
Mayor Linke stated that, in his opinion,. this was the best
marching band in the state.
Councilmember Quick stated that this is because of the
dedication of staff and quality of dedication of parents and
quality of the students and their dedication to the band and
also to the dedication and quality of the band leader.
Report of Administrator:
Orduno welcomed Bill Frits back. She stated that everyone notices
when he isn't there and they begin asking about him. The City
needs people like Bill to keep them on their toes and receive
public input. Welcome back!
Bill Frits thanked the City staff for the card he received when
he was in the hospital and also, that he is feeling much better
• now.
Mounds View City Council
II .Regular Meeting
Page Twenty
July 27, 1992
There being no further business before the Council, Mayor Linke adjourned
the meeting at 9:32 p.m.
Respectfully .submitted,
~~~~~
Mich le Severson
Depu y Clerk
•
_--------__ _-------------_ ---------_--- ~i~1ya2_l~.~a_-----
. ~ , _- _ - - , - - , -.._ -.---------.- :3 -- - ------- - - -- -
___ _.-~~~cev_d1~NJp,-~UerS~z-ec~ --~-~cessd_r__~~vr~~a~ y_~°~-v_~ST-_cc-~-------
__ _~
_____ _ __ _---- _ - -- -- -----_.__ ~0..~_Z_-~vr_.c?.~~w' D a ~ __._~.t1 _v ~ _ ! n Yi-E_ h -~Qr ~ ~ 7 ~ ~5 - --------
e a v~ S rr_ -------- I
--- - - r---- - --------(L_'! ~--~ L~J ~ _-f--~"`- ° _ _Q-d ~v t ~ /,h -Q _--h h-c~ ;2_r_ ~ -_c~~ r7G (a Q -- -- ---- -
, 1 f ~ J l ~ ~;, /
- -----T-~f~l 01L_Lr16-dd__--~~~V-_2 G~' ~ ~ _c( c!_~ _G o tic e,%~r ~ ~ __CL _U c{~~r~f~~ ~ z~! ---------;
_..W_-uf~-Y- --~'_u +~-a--~~--~_rv_~_~e~ns--~1z-~~~n e~~ ~eve~a~ -~'om-~lr_~------ ___ __----__
-._ _ _._!^ o ~~ _ o -~ -~, _~! _u ~~d ~:~~_ 7"ti-is-_s.! .? ~ ,,_____ - --- - ----- - -- --__------ ------ ---
J
------~~~-_et'~ ~ ~~ ~_rd _ a_nd _ ~ r-.~ j_~ ~~ --~-~_~_e~r-_~~~.1~'~Ca~_~ --_ ------_
• - ___ ---f-~~~ ~ c,~1--IS -3,~ _t:_c~i__t~-t~l ~_~V_ 5~_cc_n_ o c~ rs--_u_rz_d_1'y~c5-~ ~a~U-~'Q~- ----
--------.-_~.~a p_e__~ Ec~~c~-c~-d_-W ry --~U__D_tl_l~'_~_ct_c<~y_~v_c~~ __
__ _ - --T----- ----~~ ere --1s -=~t-u---w_u fer P~~ ~l~e~_~~`-~?reS_~~7 6~~czv_s ~------_ ----- --
- ~ ~ t
__ _- --_~ - u. c~ e Q Ada -~'e ---~ r ~~l ~~- 0-~'-5 ~_~-c. ~-__ y5_~ c ~ r ~ ~-i e ~~--s ~ ~r~1 Le r-- ------ _. -
-----__
_ -----_-~~ r_-- Thee _ o ~ e-_Y-s1.' e~_-.c~_c_c_e~ so r_y-_b u_i_~~-~~~~ - t s _. Q.~n_~"~_~,._ - -- -- ----- --_
•
•
TO: Paul Harrington ~~`'- 1
~ ~,~
F'R M• M k Debbie v ~ ~~
O az & Ga ett ~~ ~
SUBJECT: Dog kennel at 5200 Jeffery Dr.
We do not feel the house at 5200 Jeffery Dr. should be allowed to have a dog kennel as they
already have a large swimming pool- plus four sheds (that are already in violation of Mounds View
City space and set back ordinance} in their back yazd. We do not feel there's adequate space for a
dog kennel. We believe the signatures they obtained were from people who lived far enough away.
that they were not aware of the biting's or would care about the looks or the smell of the yard.
THANK YOU
~~a~
DEBBIE GAVETT
5210 JEFFERY DR.
MOUNDS VIEW, MN. 55112
612-786-5958
~i
July 14, 1992
Paul Harrington:
A resident of Mounds View, Gary Olson, 5209 O~Connell Drive,
called today to voice his opinion for the record regarding the
Conditional IIse Permit for 5200 Jeffrey Drive. Mr. Olson stated
that he and his .wife are opposed to allowing a kennel at this
address. Mr. Olson stated that with five out buildings on the
property he would not want to see anything 'more added and thinks
the dog situation would then get out of hand.
Mr. Olson works evenings, but he would like this to be entered as
part of the hearing, if possible.
Michele
•
lJ