HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - 2000/03/13PROCEEDINGS OF THE MOUNDS VIEW CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA
Regular Meeting
March 13, 2000
~~
". ~ Mounds View City Hall
- 2401 Highway 10, Mounds View, MN 55112
7:00 P.M.
1. MEETING IS CALLED TO ORDER
2. ROLL CALL: Marty, Quick, Stigney and Thomason.
NOT PRESENT: Coughlin.
3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
A. Monday, March 13, 2000, City Council Agenda
Acting Mayor Stigney asked the Council if anyone would like to add items to the agenda.
City Administrator Whiting requested Item 10-D be removed from the Agenda. He explained
that this item is a resolution appointing Public Works Director Mike Ulrich to act as Interim City
Administrator, and includes an adjustment in wages which, based upon past policy, would place
these wages at a higher level than those of the current position. He indicated the wage
adjustment will be recalculated, and the item will be brought back before the Council for
consideration at the next City Council Meeting.
MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Thomason. To Accept the December 13, 1999, City Council
Agenda as Amended, with the Removal of Item 10-D.
Ayes - 4 Nays - 0 Motion carried.
4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. Monday, February 28, 2000, City Council Minutes
Council Member Marty requested a correction to Page 2, third paragraph, first sentence to
indicate "...he, and two others..."
Council Member Marty requested a correction Page 15, 7E, paragraph 4, to indicate
"...unavailable on March 20..."
Acting Mayor Stigney requested a correction to Page 28, line 17 to indicate "...there are many
administrators..."
Mounds View City Council March 13, 2000
Regular Meeting Page 2
Mayor Coughlin requested a correction to Page 5, fourth full paragraph, fourth sentence to
indicate "it was not possible to contact Ramsey County that very evening because their offices
were closed."
Mayor Coughlin requested a correction to Page 5, sixth full paragraph, fourth sentence to indicate
"Chaplain Nev Crowther, of Ramsey County Sheriffs Department, and Pastor William
McKinney, of Salem Baptist Church and also Chaplain with Ramsey County Sheriffs
Department."
Mayor Coughlin requested a correction to Page 11, twelfth paragraph, last sentence to indicate
"He stated his thoughts and his prayers and those of his family would continue to be with
Brandon's family."
Mayor Coughlin requested a correction to Page 12, under Approval of February 14 minutes,
fourth correction, to indicate "Council Member Marty requested a correction to Page 14, third
paragraph, fifth line, to indicate "...$800 to $1,000 per day."
MOTION/SECOND: Marty/Thomason. To accept the February 28, 2000 City Council minutes
as corrected.
Ayes - 4 Nays - 0 Motion carried.
• B. Monday, March 6, 2000, City Council Minutes
Council Member Marty requested the Roll Call, which referenced each Council Member by their
full name, be amended to indicate "Mayor Dan Coughlin."
MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Marty. To accept the March 6, 2000 City Council minutes as
corrected.
Ayes - 4 Nays - 0 Motion carried.
5. SPECIAL ORDER OF BUSINESS
None.
6. REPORTS
Council Member Quick had no report.
Council Member Marty had no report.
Acting Mayor Stigney presented Mayor Coughlin written report as follows:
I was at the Capitol a few more times m the past couple of weeks trying to help with the
legislative efforts regarding the airport. Again my thanks and praise go to City Attorney Bob
Long and his staff along with Senator Novak and Representative Haake.
Mounds View City Council March 13, 2000
Regular Meeting Page 3
I attended a meeting facilitated by Representative Barbara Haake last Friday pertaining to safety
issues involving Highway 10. Representatives from MNDot and Ramsey County were there
along with the principal of Edgewood Middle School, Police Chief Bill Clark, Public Works
Director Mike Ulrich, and Councilwoman Lynne Thomason. Also in attendance were three
young teenagers, two of which were present when the thirteen-year old was killed recently. May
items were discussed and lots of good information came out of that meeting. My thanks to
Representative Barbara Haake for setting up that meeting, and also thanks to everyone who took
time out of the Friday evening to be a part of that group.
Finally, I would like to extend a word of thanks to Roger Stigney for filling in for me this
evening."
Acting Mayor Stigney reported he attended the Charter Commission meeting, at which there was
discussion pertaining to the clarification and enhancements of three Charter amendments, in
attempts to make them less ambiguous. He indicated there was also consideration of some
changes to the Charter Commission Bylaws, which are required to be completed during the
month of March.
Acting Mayor Stigney reported the Council/Staff Retreat would be held on Thursday, March 23,
at 5:00 p.m., in Council Chambers, rather than the Northland Inn where the previous Retreat was
- held. He stated this meeting was open to the public, and requested the Council direct the City
Administrator to post the appropriate notification.
Council Member Marty indicated this Retreat was tentatively scheduled to take place at the
Community Center, in order to provide the Council Members with a tour of the new showers and
locker rooms at the facility.
Acting Mayor Stigney stated the Council Members could tour the Community Center, after
which they could return to Council Chambers for the meeting, in order that it be broadcast.
Council Member Marty indicated there would be no City business conducted at the Retreat,
therefore, he would prefer it be held at the Community Center. He stated he appreciated the
candidness that has come forward in the past Council/Staff Retreats, and believed that in light of
some of the editorials that have appeared in the local papers pertaining to airing of the City's
"dirty laundry", this candidness and openness might not be as forthcoming. He explained that
staff might be less likely to offer their criticism in order to fine-tune the Council Members as
they had at the previous meeting.
Council Member Marty indicated the previous Retreat was very informative, in that he had
believed the Council was doing better than they actually were, however, they were apparently
falling into some of the traps that occurred in the past that they were attempting to avoid. He
pointed out that one of the Department Heads who has attended Council Meetings for a number
of years indicated the meeting prior to the retreat was the worst he had ever seen. He stated this
information has provided the Council with a wake up call, and the Council has been attempting
to utilize this criticism to improve. He advised that this frank discussion would not occur if they
were to meet in the Council Chambers, in that everyone would be more inhibited in front of the
Mounds View City Council March 13, 2000
Regular Meeting Page 4
camera. He requested the Council Members welcome this frank discussion, and accept the
constructive criticism, without inhibiting it in any way. He reiterated that they would not be
conducting any City business, and the meeting would be open to the public.
MOTION/SECOND: Marty/Quick. To Hold the Staff/Council Retreat at the Community Center
to Tour the Community Center in its Completed State, and View the Showers and Locker
Rooms, and to Facilitate any Open Discussion/Criticism.
Council Member Thomason stated she concurred. She explained that during the Retreat, the
Council does not set policy, or engage in any business that would affect the residents. She stated
this is a team building, honesty seeking effort, geared toward open communication between staff
and the Council, and much welcome and unwelcome constructive criticism has occurred which is
for the betterment of both the staff and the Council.
Acting Mayor Stigney indicated that in a democracy, a posted public meeting should be
broadcast on cable television. He stated the two previous Retreats that were held at the
Northland Inn dealt with goal setting for the City, and he believed the residents should be
apprised of the goals for the City. He indicated this was a perfect opportunity to hold the
meeting in Council Chambers, rather than going across the street, and attempting to stay off
camera.
Ayes - 3 Nays - 1 (Stigney) Motion carried.
Council Member Thomason had no report.
Council Member Marty stated he has heard discussion in the community pertaining to the loss of
life that occurred in front of City Hall, and some rumors have been spreading. He indicated the
report from the State Patrol has been received, and in his understanding, the rate of speed the
driver was travelling was 38 miles per hour, and as routine procedure, blood alcohol and drug
analysis were conducted, and were determined to be negative.
City Administrator Whiting stated the City received a donation from a young person in the
community, to be put towards a tunnel or pedestrian bridge on Highway 10. He indicated that as
discussed at the previous Council Meeting, the City is able to accept such donations, which
should be accompanied with some form of identification, and an indication at to their purpose.
He stated donations would be held until such time that a project is decided upon, or it is
appropriate to turn the money back. He stated he has been in contact with an individual who is
interested in setting up a benefit, which could possibly be held at the Community Center, and
further information in this regard will be forthcoming.
City Administrator Whiting stated Acting Mayor Stigney has suggested that staff schedule a
quarterly report of staff. He explained that this is typically done at the Council Work Session, at
which time, the Council is either presented with a formal report, or calculations are made
regarding the number of times staff members have assisted the Council on issues. He pointed out
that it might not be appropriate to schedule this matter for consideration at the Staff/Council
Retreat, as this would involve bringing the residents out of their homes in the evening. He
Mounds View City Council March 13, 2000
Regular Meeting Page 5
indicated that the Council could determine when they would like to consider this report, and staff
would schedule the item on the Agenda, and make themselves available.
Acting Mayor Stigney advised that the City Charter requires that City Departments make a
quarterly report to the residents as to the status of expenditures and items of this nature, and this
should be considered at a public meeting such as a Council Meeting or Work Session. He
indicated the next Council Meeting would be held on March 27, however, he was not certain if
that Agenda could accommodate this item.
Council Member Marty stated this matter should be postponed until the next Council Work
Session, which would be held on April 3.
Acting Mayor Stigney stated it was the consensus of the Council to consider the quarterly report
at the April 3 Council Work Session.
City Attorney Long reported that Senator Novak's Airport Bill has cleared the Senate Local
Government Committee, and is awaiting Senate action either at the end of next week or early the
following week. He indicated the Bill Representative Haake introduced the previous year passed
out of all of the Policy Committees last year, and is currently in the Rules Committee of the
House. He indicated this Bill has again cleared all of the Policy Committees, and is being put in
final form to go to the Floor. He explained that they are currently waiting to have some
discussion with some of the House leadership, primarily regarding the form of the Bill when it
goes to the House Floor.
City Attorney Long advised that both Representative Haake and Senator Novak were working
very hard, and at this point, it is simply a matter of procedure. He indicated there was a very
large volume of Bills being heard on both the House and Senate Floors, and in fact, so many Bills
that they are actually competing for time to be heard. He explained that they were attempting to
insure that the Bills are scheduled on the General Orders to be heard, and they do not foresee a
problem in this regard.
Council Member Marty inquired regarding the next course of action, if for some reason the Bill
is not heard.
City Attorney Long stated there has been discussion regarding alternatives, such as adding the
language in the separate Bills as amendments to different Omnibus Bills which are currently
going through the process. He explained that the Omnibus Bills would be heard because they are
Funding Bills, and general State Government Operation Bills, and there are clearly a couple of
these that would be appropriate for a future amendment with this language. He stated they are
considering this as a second option, in the event that there is some difficulty with the timing,
however, either way, he believed they would have a Floor Senate and House vote on the Bill.
No further reports were considered.
7. CONSENT AGENDA
A. Approve Just and Correct Claims.
Mounds View City Council March 13, 2000
Regular Meeting Page 6
B. Licenses for Approval.
C. Set a Public Hearing for7:05 p.m., Monday, March 27, 2000, for the Second
Reading and Adoption of Ordinances 655, an Ordinance Rezoning Bridges
Golf Course Parcels from CRP and I-1 to PF.
D. Set a Public hearing for 7:10 p.m., Monday, March 27, 2000, for the Second
Reading and Adoption of Ordinance 656, an Ordinance Amending Section
1008.08 of the Municipal Code Pertaining to Billboards.
E. Set a Public Hearing for 7:15 p.m., Monday, March 27, 2000, for the Second
Reading and Adoption of Ordinance 657, an Ordinance Adding a New
Chapter 1126 to the Zoning Code Pertaining to Interim Uses.
F. Set a Public Hearing for 7:20 p.m., Monday, March 27, 2000, to Consider a
Resolution Regarding an Interim Use Permit to Allow Two Billboards on
SYSCO Property.
Acting Mayor Stigney asked the Council if anyone would like to remove Items for discussion.
Council Member Marty requested Item F be removed for additional discussion.
MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Marty. To Approve the Consent Agenda for Items A, B, C, D, and
E as presented.
Ayes - 4 Nays - 0 Motion carried.
n it
Council Member Marty stated the Council had ongmally discussed six billboards o C y
property, with a seventh billboard possible on Sysco property. He indicated the billboards were
originally to be spaced 1,500 feet apart, and the Council had decreased this spacing requirement
to 1,000 feet, however, Sysco would like to have two billboards on their property, and to further
decrease the 1,000-foot spacing requirement through a variance. He stated Sysco would also be
utilizing Delite Sign Company, which is a different billboard company than that utilized by the
City. He explained that he did not desire this section of Highway 10 to become "Billboard
Row."
Council Member Marty indicated he did not like billboards, however, they are a necessity in
terms of paying off the escalating debt at the golf course, which increases by $33,000 per year in
bond payments alone. He stated he was concerned with regard to the decreased spacing
requirement, and that the billboards proposed on the Sysco property would not conform to the
design the Council has tentatively approved for use on the City property, which is in keeping
with the aesthetics of the Bridges Golf Course. He indicated that at least one of the billboards
proposed by Sysco would be a standard monopole structure, located on a parking lot, and raised
to allow trucks to pass underneath.
Acting Mayor Stigney advised that the consideration before the Council was to set a public
hearing for discussion of this matter. He pointed out that most of these questions are being
addressed by the Planning Commission, and this item is simply to establish a public hearing to
allow the residents the opportunity to comment on this proposal.
Mounds View City Council March 13, 2000
Regular Meeting Page 7
City Attorney Long stated this was correct. He explained that if the Planning Commission
recommends Council approval of an Interim Use Permit for the billboard proposed by Sysco, the
Interim Use Permit would contain the same decorative signage requirements as those placed on
the six signs proposed for the golf course property. He stated there would be uniformity in terms
of the appearance of the billboards.
City Attorney Long stated that in order for the billboard on the Sysco property to comply with the
decorative signage requirement, a variance would be necessary. He stated that if the City imposes
the decorative signage requirement on this billboard, which it will do, Sysco's response would be
to accept that, however, they would then require a variance in order to place the sign on a
different portion of their property. He explained that there are only certain areas of the Sysco
property that can accommodate a monument style sign, due to their trucking operations, and the
external condition the City imposes becomes part of the basis for the variance. He stated this
was his understanding of the manner in which the Planning Commission is examining this
proposal, and the form it will take as it comes before the Council on March 27.
Council Member Marty stated he understood this, however, as they were all aware, if questions
have not been raised prior to the public hearing, there is the potential that they might be
overlooked. He indicated he would at least like to raise these issues, and have them passed back
to the Planning Commission for consideration.
Acting Mayor Stigney explained that this matter is in process, and the Planning Commission is
considering all of these items.
MOTION/SECOND: Thomason/Stigney. To Approve Item F, to Set a Public Hearing for 7:20
p.m., March 27, 2000, to Consider a Resolution Regarding an Interim Use Permit to Allow for
Two Billboards on Sysco Property.
Ayes - 3 Nays - 1 (Marty) Motion carried.
8. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
None.
9. RESIDENTS REQUESTS AND COMMENTS FROM THE FLOOR
David Jahnke, 8428 Eastwood Road stated he attended the previous Council Meeting at which a
comment was made that there were three Council Members who had voted against the pedestrian
bridge, and they should be held responsible for this child's death. He stated he did not care to
bring this forward again, as it is tragic, and having nine grandchildren, himself, could not
imagine this. He explained however, he felt very disappointed that a citizen would ask such a
question of one of the Council Members present, and of the two previous Council Members who
were not. He stated they were definitely not responsible for this accident in any way. He
indicated he had spoken to other residents who thought it was a terrible thing to accuse someone
of being responsible for this child's death.
Mounds View City Council March 13, 2000
Regular Meeting Page 8
Kimberly Oberg, 8340 Pleasant View Drive stated she and a number of residents from her street
were before the Council two weeks earlier to discuss the Spring Lake Park proposal of a traffic
light at the intersection of Pleasant View Drive and County Road 10. She stated she had been
unable to attend the previous Council Work Session, as she was presenting the issues to the
Spring Lake Park City Council, however, she had seen the meeting on videotape. She indicated
Director of Public Works Ulrich had once again referred to the original survey during this
meeting, and this was very offensive to the residents who have since followed up on this matter,
and have learned what the. consequences are. She requested the Council consider that they had
done an honest survey. She explained that they asked everyone, did not twist any arms, and felt
they represented the block accurately. She commented that any type of survey could be written,
or twisted, or the outcome not presented, however, once the outcome is known, the people should
be afforded the opportunity to reconsider their response.
Mrs. Oberg indicated that at the meeting, the Council provided action directives, which included
that Director of Public Works Ulrich examine the placement of lights. She stated she had spoken
with Bruce Kasner of MNDot regarding this, and he indicated there is no rule, or even a standard,
but only a judgment call in terms of driver visibility, the configuration of the intersection, the
turning radius, and the current road placement and function of the road. She stated Mr. Kasner
was very knowledgeable, and was apparently quite involved in the lengthy battle with Spring
Lake Park regarding the installation of the light on Pleasant View Drive. She stated Mr. Kasner
indicated that sometimes they have to close the median and open up a new hole, which is exactly
what they have been proposing. She advised that there is no magic number, and nothing
• prohibiting Spring Lake Park or Anoka County from considering their proposal.
Mrs. Oberg stated she has met with the Spring Lake Park City Council, and with the Pam
Iverson, of Jerry's Floor Store, who represents the business interests, and they have scheduled an
offsite meeting the following day, to discuss this matter. She stated she had presented the
residential concerns, and felt that she and the business were not very well received. She
indicated they made fun of their alternatives, and suggested that they were attempting to get
Mounds View to pull the funding and back out. She indicated that this was incorrect, and
explained that they had requested Mounds View continue to cooperate, however, they would like
to have an alternative presented, and they would not be opposed to continuing funding. She
stated they believed there could be cooperation between Mounds View Spring Lake Park and
Anoka County to come to an optimum solution.
Mrs. Oberg indicated that during the videotape of the Council Work Session, there was
discussion of offering up the street as a sacrifice to appease Spring Lake Park. She stated she
was not certain if she had understood this correctly, however, this was the impression she
received, and therefore, would request that the Council not do this. She stated the Council
represents Mounds View, and the residents would like to be assured that they are continuing to
hear them in this regard.
Mrs. Oberg stated City Attorney Long was directed to investigate some legal issues, and she was
• very interested in learning the outcome of his discovery. She stated she had met with some of the
residents of Oak Crest, and they indicated they would prefer a fight at the alternative location
they have suggested, however, they were afraid that if they speak up they will not get a light at
all. She expressed her appreciation to the Council for hearing this matter, and to those who hung
Mounds View City Council March 13, 2000
Regular Meeting Page 9
. with the heart of the request. She requested the Council simply look at an alternative, and on
behalf of the residents, withdraw the funding until such time as this has been considered.
Council Member Marty inquired regarding the time and location of the meeting the following
day.
Mrs. Oberg indicated that the city of Spring Lake Park has requested Dawn Iverson and Pam
Sibing keep this a business meeting, and she has been asked not to attend, therefore, she would
assume it would be a closed meeting. She stated all the major businesses and landholders are
expected to attend, including the owner of the Spring Lake Park Mobile Home Association, who
would be flying in from California. She indicated she could provide a report of the proceedings
after the meeting, and could provide the Council with the telephone numbers of Pam Sibing or
Dawn Iverson for further information.
Council Member Marty requested Mrs. Oberg provide this information on his voice mail. He
stated he would be interested in attending the meeting the following evening, if only to observe
the proceedings. He indicated that at the previous Work Session, Public Works Director Ulrich
was simply reporting back to the Council regarding this matter. He stated the survey had been
distributed, and he had voted in favor of the light at that time, based upon the results of the
survey. He explained that at the time, the question was black and white, in terms of whether or
not the citizens desired a light, and the majority had indicated a light would be acceptable,
therefore, he cast his vote accordingly.
ncil Member Mart ointed out that it was ossible that some eo le did not understand the
Cou y p p p p
survey, however, the matter has now proceeded to the point that further input and discussion
pertaining to withdrawing their small amount funding is not very productive. He explained that
Director of Public Works Ulrich has advised that this project would proceed whether Mounds
View withdraws its 12.5 percent or not, however, if they do not, the City would have some input
into the matter. He advised that if the configuration of the street and the light do not work out,
and the City has maintained some input in the matter, Anoka County has indicated they would
redesign the corner. He commented that this was somewhat a sad compromise, however, at this
point in time, there were not very many alternatives.
Council Member Marty indicated Director of Public Works Ulrich has spoken with Police Chief
Clark regarding traffic studies in this area. He explained that if the project proceeds as proposed,
and traffic increases significantly in the next few months, they maybe able to close off or cul-de-
sac the end of Pleasant View Drive. He stated he had inquired regarding Fire Department access,
and other issues had come forward at the Work Session in terms of pushing this problem off onto
some of the other streets in the area, however, there are not many options available.
Mrs. Oberg stated the city of Spring Lake Park suggested that their alternative proposal would
increase traffic on Westwood Drive, however, she pointed out that if they believe that curving the
road off to the left was a solution for their street, it should also be viable on this street. She
indicated there was no reason to route that traffic in front of the senior residence.
Mrs. Oberg stated she did not believe the statement that Anoka County would inevitably proceed
with this project was correct. She explained that they have some "over-interested in their own
Mounds View City Council March 13, 2000
Regular Meeting Page 10
design" engineers, however, MNDot has not seen the design plans, and must sign off on the
project. She indicated Ramsey County has not seen the design, and she has contacted many
people who are not aware of how the project is proposed. She advised that a final hearing of the
matter has been scheduled in May, and at this point, operating under the assumption that this
project will proceed as proposed is a fallacy.
Mrs. Oberg stated she was aware that the Council voted as they had because they believed the
residents desired the light based upon the results of the survey, however, the survey was
somewhat misleading. She explained that for some reason, two opposing responses were not
included, one being hers, three individuals indicated they would never have answered yes to the
survey, and others responded in favor of the light were shocked at the consequences. She
indicated there was some doubt to be cast upon the survey, however, she recognized that the
Council had voted based upon what they believed the needs and desires of the neighborhood
were. She reiterated that they would simply request the Council consider the alternatives that
would benefit the residents of Pleasant View Drive, as well as the business of Spring Lake Park,
which are struggling. She stated many people need representation in this matter, and she was
very glad the Mounds View City Council Members were their representatives, because she did
not feel very welcome in Spring Lake Park.
Council Member Marty indicated he had driven along Pleasant View Drive, and could see the
issues that have been brought forward. He indicated there were a number of issues due to
previous decisions, which have placed Mounds View in a less than favorable light with MNDot.
He advised that the less attention they bring to themselves, the farther they will go with MNDot,
adding that if they were to bring something forward to MNDot at this time, rt would only serve to
lessen their credibility.
Acting Mayor Stigney stated it was his understanding that the Council gave direction to have
Spring Lake Park and Ramsey County look into all the issues that have been raised, and each of
those issues will have to be identified and addressed. He explained that this matter is still in
process, and hopefully there could be some cooperative effort, and possibly some adjustments in
the plan could accommodate the desires of both Spring Lake Park and Mounds View. He
inquired if this information would be provided to the Council, and Mrs. Oberg would be notified
when it comes forward.
City Administrator Whiting stated he assumed it would be.
Mallory Crum, 7820 Gloria Circle stated she attended the meeting facilitated by Representative
Haake pertaining to safety issues on Highway 10. She requested an update regarding the status
of these issues, in terms of the traffic lights, the pedestrian bridge and items of this nature.
Acting Mayor Stigney stated at the previous Council Work Session, several issues were
identified, and the Police Chief, and staff are working with Ramsey County, attempting to make
the lights safer, and improve the access on Highway 10.
h
Crty Administrator Whiting indicated that at the Work Session, they were informed that t e
traffic lights provide sufficient time to cross the road. He stated that from staff s perspective,
every department that has any correlation to Highway 10 would approach the issues based upon
Mounds View City Council March 13, 2000
Regular Meeting Page 11
• safety as they see it. He explained that attempting to determine some form of coordinated effort
on a large scale might actually inhibit the development of a direction, therefore, in the next
several months, the citizens will be hearing about individual programs, policies, and actions that
could be taken to assist in this matter. He pointed out that this might not be recognizable in
terms of seeing these items individually listed on the agenda, however, this is the approach they
will be taking.
City Administrator Whiting stated alarge-scale plan, such as constructing a pedestrian bridge or
a trail system, would involve a community effort, and would simply take time. He indicated
some of these items may come forward in the future in discussion, and the level of local interest
will have an effect upon keeping these considerations before the Council and staff, however, the
solutions are not always readily apparent, and not everyone is always in agreement.
Ms. Crum inquired if money was one of the primary reasons that little was being done at this
time.
City Administrator Whiting stated there is the question of how the money would be utilized. He
explained that there are questions pertaining to whether it would it be used for a pedestrian
bridge or trails, how they would insure that if a bridge was constructed, the citizens would utilize
it, and where the bridge would be located. He stated these questions have been debated in the
community for quite some time, and the pedestrian bridge that was proposed three years prior,
had it been approved, would have been constructed a quarter mile from the recent accident site.
• He advised that money was always an issue, however, they were attempting to determine what
should be done to make the entire 2.5 mile stretch of four-lane highway through Mounds View
safer for the citizens to use and cross, no matter where they are located.
Council Member Marty indicated Police Chief Clark and Director of Public Works Ulrich had
flown up and down Highway 10 in a helicopter, to observe the traffic patterns. He stated the
local newspaper and representatives of MNDot have taken pictures of the accident site, and
further information would be coming forward in the next week or so concerning this matter. He
indicated a telephone call to Council Member Thomason had been forwarded to him from a
resident who believed the City should have 15 pedestrian bridges.
Council Member Marty indicated Highway 10 is traffic friendly, not pedestrian friendly, and they
are attempting to make the entire stretch of roadway safer, instead of simply attempting to
immediately obtain funds, and construct a pedestrian bridge at the Edgewood Drive intersection.
He explained that citizens cross Highway 10 at many different points. He pointed out that the
original site proposed for the pedestrian bridge was a quarter mile from the accident site, and all
were aware that people do not generally wish to go a quarter mile out of their way to reach to
their destination. He indicated another fatality occurred on Pleasant View Drive, and one
pedestrian bridge at Edgewood Drive would not help those residents. He advised that they must
have a good idea of what it will take to fix the entire road correctly, prior to considering the
aspects of funding.
• cil r M stated this woul of be an overni ht rocess. He noted the revious
Coun Membe arty d o g p p
bridge discussion went on for quite some time before the matter even came to a vote, however,
he felt encouraged that there is some public support and momentum to attempt to fix the entire
Mounds View City Council March 13, 2000
Regular Meeting Page 12
Highway 10 corridor through Mounds View. He added that he was particularly encouraged to
i see the young people coming to City Hall.
Ms. Crum stated she would be meeting with her school principal the following day, to prepare an
overview of this matter for the Focus Newspaper. She inquired if there was anything the Council
would care to include, in terms of what was taking place with regard to the highway, the bridge
and items of this nature.
Council Member Marty suggested Ms. Crum consult with the editor of the Focus Newspaper, as
she was one of the individuals who was present at the accident site, and had worked with Police
Chief Clark and Public Works Director Ulrich at that time. He explained that she might be able
to provide more updated information. He added that Ms. Crum could contact City Administrator
Whiting or his assistant, Givonna Reed, and inquire regarding any new developments.
Ms. Crum inquired if the donation received by the City was from a student at Edgewood Middle
School.
City Administrator Whiting stated he would have to check to determine where the donor attended
school, however, the donation appeared to be from a young person, and it was directed to the
Finance Department for safekeeping.
Ms. Crum inquired if the City was requesting donations.
• r ies on the lannin and dealin
City Administrator Whiting advised that they focus their ene g p g, g
with what takes place on a road of this size in neighborhood type settings, in terms of where
people would desire to cross, and why the accident occurred the way it did. He indicated these
things can not always be explained, and there was no one present who did not wish they could
turn the back the clock and do one thing to keep that accident from having occurred. He stated
from the City's standpoint, as they attempt to deal with this on a daily basis, they are faced with
questions regarding what the citizens who cross the highway know about crossing. He stated it
was reported to him that during the meeting the previous day, in the presence of the State Senator
and the State Representative who were discussing these issues, a parent and a child crossed the
highway on the light. He pointed out that they could construct bridges all over the highway,
however, they are not able to control everything.
City Administrator Whiting indicated a freeway system is walled in, and there is no pedestrian
access, however, Highway 10 is not a freeway, and he was not certain that the community would
desire such a barrier. He stated he has suggested to the Council and the community, and an
article had been written before this accident actually occurred, that changing the character of the
road was a means to deal with the interaction of pedestrians and vehicles on Highway 10. He
indicated there have been many debates with regard to this issue, and a large amount of money
has been spent in the past for studies. He stated the City has taken several different approaches
to address the issues, including the Comprehensive Plan. He explained it was not as though the
• community has not attempted to address some of these issues, however, it is exasperating
because of what can occur, which leaves one wondering what could have been done differently,
however, sometimes there is not much that could have been done.
Mounds View City Council March 13, 2000
Regular Meeting Page 13
City Administrator Whiting stated the Council passed a resolution in support of a Bill which
came before them at the previous Work Session. He advised that this Bill is still alive in the
State House, and calls for changing the rules at the State level with regard to the timing of the
traffic lights. He indicated the Bill also contains a provision for funds to educate people
regarding the proper method of crossing the streets. He stated the Council was in agreement with
this, and this is one of many things they are attempting to do. He indicated that a pedestrian
bridge would cost upwards of $500,000 to $1,000,000, however, he believed that determining a
plan for how to live with Highway 10 would be the best use of their energies. He reiterated that
this was a difficult issue, and would involve much time and frank discussion to determine a
means to coexist with Highway 10.
Ms. Crum stated she and several of her classmates would be willing to instruct their school with
regard to crossing the road, and this would be discussed at their meeting the following day.
City Administrator Whiting stated the City would certainly make the Police Department available
to assist with this effort.
Ms. Crum thanked the Council and staff members for their assistance in this matter. She
indicated that this has been very difficult for her, and she appreciated their time.
Acting Mayor Stigney stated this was a tragic incident, and they all understood they were
attempting to address it with whatever means possible. He indicated it might be beneficial for
• Ms. Crum to obtain a copy of the previous Work Session packet, to assist with her overview of
this matter. He explained that the packet contained an entire page or two of items they were
being considered to improve Highway 10. He advised that Ms. Crum could contact City
Administrator Whiting or Assistant to the City Administrator Reed in this regard.
City Administrator Whiting indicated the City appreciated the donation that was made that date.
He indicated that when the issue of donations came forward, the question was put to the City as
to whether or not they could accept donations, and this was determined to be acceptable. He
pointed out that Brandon's family might also be in some need, and for those who desire to
contribute, this would be a very appropriate place to make such donations.
Ms. Crum stated their school has sponsored a memorial, and she was personally aware that many
eighth graders have donated much money for Brandon's family. She stated she was willing to
donate anything she could to make Highway 10 safer, because they do not need to lose another
friend.
There were no further requests or comments from the floor.
10. COUNCIL BUSINESS
A. Public Hearing (7:05 p.m.) and Consideration of Resolution 5419, a
Resolution Approving an Interim Use Permit for Six Billboards at the
Bridges Golf Course.
Acting Mayor Stigney opened the Public Hearing at 8:05 p.m.
Mounds View City Council March 13, 2000
Regular Meeting Page 14
Planning Associate Ericson stated he would like to take this opportunity to remind the Council
that on Saturday, March 18, the North Metro Home and Garden Show would be taking place at
the Community Center from 9:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. He indicated there would be approximately
50 vendors at this event, and City staff members would be present, as well as staff from Fridley,
New Brighton and Blaine. He stated this should be a very good show for people who are
interested in home improvement or landscaping projects in the upcoming year. He indicated this
was a free event, and there would be door prizes, activities for the children, and food and
beverages would be available as well.
Planning Associate Ericson stated the item before the Council is Resolution 5419, which is a
resolution approving an Interim Use Permit for six billboards to be installed at the Bridges Golf
Course. He indicated that in December of 1999, the Council adopted Ordinance 644, which
allows for outdoor advertising signs as an interim use on properties north of Highway 10.
Planning Associate Ericson provided an overview of the general requirements for billboards in
these districts. He indicated the billboards must located 250 feet from residentially zoned
properties, and the minimum spacing from billboard to billboard is 1,000 feet. He advised that
the maximum sign area is 750 square feet or less, and the maximum sign height is 35 feet.
Planning Associate Ericson stated Eller Media has presented the City with a proposal to install
six signs on the golf course property. He indicated the Planning Commission has considered this
• request, and at their last two meetings on February 16 and March 1, had some very lengthy and
significant discussions regarding this issue. He explained that now that billboards are a use
conditionally allowed by the City Code, the Planning Commissions focused upon the proposal
presented by Eller Media, in terms of the types of billboards presented, and whether or not the
proposal fits with the City Code. He advised that this proposal meets all of the requirements, and
fits with the City Code.
Planning Associate Ericson stated the Planning Commission had concerns with regard to the
theme of the signs as stated in the proposal. He explained that not all of the signs were proposed
to be the same high quality brick and monument type structure. He indicated that in their
resolution of approval, the Planning Commission has recommended that all of the billboards be
of this monument style design.
Planning Associate Ericson stated another issue of concern to the Planning Commission was the
advertising content that Eller Media would allow on the signs. He explained that because the
City is the landowner and leaseholder of these signs, the Planning Commission recommended
that the City take a more stringent approach to the permitted content, specifically with regard to
gambling advertising. He advised that the Planning Commission felt that in not allowing any
advertising for alcohol and tobacco products, or other types of objectionable advertising, the City
should also restrict advertising promoting gambling. He indicated this recommendation has also
been included in their resolution of approval, and this was an issue for the Council to determine
. during their consideration.
Planning Associate Ericson stated the last item pertains to a proposal from Sysco Foods, and
their request to install two billboards on Sysco property. He indicated this item has been
Mounds View City Council March 13, 2000
Regular Meeting Page 15
• scheduled for Planning Commission consideration on Wednesday, March 15, however, the
Commission was concerned that their recommendation of approval of the six billboards on the
golf course not hamper Sysco from achieving the two billboards they are requesting on their
property. He indicated this was matter was discussed with Golf Course Superintendent, John
Hammerschmidt, in terms of a possible shift in the spacing to provide for the 1,000 foot
separation. He stated that after researching this matter, Superintendent Hammerschmidt advised
that the spacing of the signs and their proposed locations were relative to the physical features on
the golf course. He indicated that if the signs were shifted to allow for the two signs on the
Sysco property, and maintaining the 1,000-foot separation, one of the billboards would be
situated in the eighth green, which would not be feasible.
Planning Associate Ericson stated the Planning Commission has recommended to the City
Council that the two parties work together to determine a solution. He indicated both
Superintendent Hammerschmidt and the representative of Delite Sign Company were agreeable
to this, and both felt that this matter could be resolved.
Planning Associate Ericson stated on March 1, the Planning Commission recommended to the
City Council that the request for the Interim Use Permit be approved. He explained that this
recommendation was also based in part on Ordinance 644, which requires that the adverse effects
criteria be considered with regard to the billboards. He advised that this pertains to how the use
impacts the relationship to the Municipal Comprehensive Plan, the geographical area involved,
the character of the surrounding area, and whether such use will tend to depreciate the area. He
indicated the Planning Commission, in reviewing these items, felt that the installation of the
billboards on the golf course property would not have an adverse impact upon the golf course
itself, or upon neighboring properties.
Planning Associate Ericson stated the Planning Commission also reviewed the general
conditional use permit criteria, which must also be examined pursuant to Ordinance 644. He
explained that although this is an Interim Use Permit, the Ordinance indicates that this use be
reviewed in the same manner and context as a conditional use. He advised that the Planning
Commission considered the eight separate criteria that are presented in the City Code for
conditional uses, and felt that the proposal, as presented by Eller Media complied with these
conditions, and were consistent with the City Code. He stated that in light of this, and the
willingness of both parties to work together on their separate applications, the Planning
Commission recommended approval of the Interim Use Permit.
Planning Associate Ericson stated staff has drafted Resolution 5419, which approves the Interim
Use Permit for six billboards to be constructed on the Bridges Golf Course property, with
stipulations. He indicated the first stipulation indicates that the billboards shall be designed and
constructed as indicated within the Eller Media proposal, dated January 14, 2000. He pointed out
that if the Council desires to dictate that all six billboards be constructed of exactly the same
materials, such language should be added at this time, as this is not specifically stated in the
resolution.
•
Planning Associate Ericson stated the second stipulation indicates that the locations of the
proposed billboards are to be as indicated on Page 8 of Eller Media's proposal. He stated the last
Mounds View City Council March 13, 2000
Regular Meeting Page 16
• stipulation indicates that if the selected billboard vendor, Eller Media, is unable to obtain the
necessary permits from MNDot, the Interim Use Permit shall be considered null and void.
Planning Associate Ericson advised that Sysco's proposal would be before the Planning
Commission for a public hearing the following Wednesday, and a number of the issues Council
Member Marty had brought forward would be addressed. He explained that all of those issues
should be resolved in one form or another in the Planning Commission's recommendation to the
Council, and all parties feel very strongly that the issues will be resolved in the sense that no one
should be harmed by these applications. He indicated the City is not a proponent of billboards,
as the Council has stated in the past, however, the Code is in place, and they must accept the
applications and review them in terms of whether or not they are consistent with the City Code
and the Comprehensive Plan.
Acting Mayor Stigney thanked Plarming Associate Ericson for his very detailed overview of this
item.
Council Member Quick inquired if notification had been provided to residents within 250 feet of
the proposed site, when the Planning Commission held the public hearing on this matter.
Planning Associate Ericson stated it was.
Council Member Quick inquired regarding the height of the proposed billboards. Planning
Associate Ericson stated they would be no more than 35 feet in height.
•
There was no public input.
Acting Mayor Stigney closed the Public Hearing at 8:25 p.m.
City Attorney Long advised that when the public hearing for this matter was originally
scheduled, staff had thought that Item E of the Consent Agenda would be on the same time
frame. He explained that this item pertains to the aspect of amending the Code by adopting State
Law that puts into place the authority to issue Interim Use Permits. He indicated that
procedurally, this item should be in place before the City can actually grant an Interim Use
Permit, and therefore, he would recommend that the Council lay over the resolution until their
next meeting. He explained that the application before the Council would still be in line ahead
the Sysco proposal, and the Council would be have the opportunity to consider it in advance of
that, however, they do not wish to grant an Interim Use Permit before this statutory provision is
met.
MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Marty. To Lay Over Consideration of Resolution 5419, a
Resolution Approving an Interim Use Permit for Six Billboards at the Bridges Golf Course Until
the Next Meeting of the City Council.
Ayes - 4 Nays - 0 Motion carried.
t
Acting Mayor Stigney recessed the Council Meeting at 8:26 p.m.
The City Council Meeting reconvened at 8:35 p.m.
Mounds View City Council
Regular Meeting
March 13, 2000
Page 17
B. Public Hearing (7:10 p.m.) and Consideration of Resolution 5420 Adopting
the City's Business Subsidy Policy under Minnesota Statutes, Sections
116J.993 through 116J.995.
Acting Mayor Stigney opened the Public Hearing at 8:36 p.m.
Economic Development Coordinator Parrish stated in 1999, the Legislature passed the Business
Subsidy Act, which requires all communities to adopt a Business Subsidy Policy to guide the
development of Business Subsidy Agreements. He explained that if the City does not have a
policy developed, they are unable to grant a financial or other incentive for business attraction or
attention purposes.
Economic Development Coordinator Parrish indicated Business Subsidy Agreements are
required to incorporate goals and objectives for any incentive offered in excess of $25,000. He
advised that the policy before the Council was generic in nature, however, allows the community
maximum flexibility when granting development incentives. He stated the two matters currently
before the Council are the public hearing, by which to obtain public input, and the consideration
of Resolution 5420, which approves the City's Business Subsidy Policy.
There was no public input.
• Acting Mayor Stigney closed the Public Hearing at 8:37 p.m.
Council Member Marty inquired if the new rules indicate that the City could not provide business
assistance as they have in the past, unless this Business Subsidy Policy in effect. Economic
Development Coordinator Parrish stated this was correct.
Acting Mayor Stigney stated his understanding is that the City must have a policy in order to
grant business subsidies, and that the policy will follow the Minnesota Statutes. Economic
Development Coordinator Parrish stated this was correct. He indicated the policy has been
widely distributed, and it is in conformity with the enabling legislation.
MOTION/SECOND: Marty/Thomason. To Waive the Reading and Approve Resolution No.
5420, a Resolution Adopting Business Subsidy Criteria.
Ayes - 4 Nays - 0 Motion carried.
C. Approval of Agreement for Services with Brimeyer Group for City
Administrator Starting March 28, 2000.
City Administrator Whiting stated the Council has been provided with a copy of the Brimeyer
Group proposal, in the amount of $15,000, plus expenses. He explained that Mr. Brimeyer is
currently involved in eleven searches, and may have some time constraints at the onset of this
process, however, he is familiar with Mounds View and should be able to make up this time very
quickly. He stated if the Council is in agreement, they can formally approve this agreement, as
they had indicated at the previous Council Work Session.
Mounds View City Council March 13, 2000
Regular Meeting Page 18
i MOTION/SECOND: Thomason/Marty. To Approve an Agreement for Services with Brimeyer
Group for City Administrator Starting March 28, 2000.
Ayes - 4 Nays - 0 Motion carried.
D. Resolution Appointing Public Works Director Mike Ulrich Interim City
Administrator Starting March 28, 2000.
This item was removed from the current Agenda at the request of the City Administrator.
E. First Reading (Introduction) of Ordinance 655, an Ordinance Approving a
Rezoning of Bridges Golf Course Parcels from CRP (Conservancy,
Recreation and Preservation) and I-1 (Industrial) to PF (Public Facilities).
Planning Associate Ericson stated during the course of researching the City's application for an
Interim Use Permit for billboards at the golf course, staff realized that the zoning of the golf
course was not consistent with what they had believed it to be, nor was it consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan or the City Code. He indicated there are a number of different parcels on
the golf course, which is multi-zoned with I-1 (Industrial), CRP (Conservancy, Recreation and
Preservation), and PF, (Public Facilities) designations. He advised that in staff's opinion, the
appropriate zoning for the golf course is the PF Zoning District, which allows for golf courses as
• a permitted use. He indicated golf courses are not allowed in the CRP or the I-1 Zoning
Districts.
Planning Associate Ericson stated staff recommends the rezoning of those parcels of the golf
course which are presently zoned CRP and I-1, to the Public Facilities designation, so that they
are in keeping with the Comprehensive Plan and the City Code. He added that it is presumed
that the PF zoning designation would be more advantageous with regard to the City's application
for billboards, in terms of the potential location of billboards on the golf course. He advised that
Ordinance 655 effectuates this zoning change, and is before the Council for first reading at this
time.
MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Thomason. To Waive the Reading and Approve the First Reading
of Ordinance No. 655, an Ordinance Approving a Rezoning of Bridges Golf Course Parcels from
CRP (Conservancy, Recreation and Preservation) and I-1 (Industrial) to PF (Public Facilities).
Ayes - 4 Nays - 0 Motion carried.
F. Park Requisitions.
YMCA Director Terri Blattenbauer indicated she had previously come before the Council at a
Work Session, to discuss the use of a small amount of the Park Dedication Funds for two items
. of park enhancement. She explained one of these items was backstop netting and a third baseline
net for Greenfield Park, and the other was to replace, repair and secure disc golfing units for
Silverview Park.
Mounds View City Council March 13, 2000
Regular Meeting Page 19
• Ms. Blattenbauer stated the purpose of the netting is to control an inherent problem of baseballs
going into neighborhoods. She explained that they have decided to angle some netting behind
home plate and also along the third baseline. She indicated there are six disc golf units that are
either missing or damaged, and they determined it would be most cost effective to replace these
units. She advised that the total cost for both of these projects is $3,415, and she was before the
Council at this time to obtain formal approval for the use of these funds.
Council Member Quick inquired regarding the nature of disc golf.
•
Ms. Blattenbauer explained that disc golf is a form of golf in which small discs are thrown into
baskets. She indicated the game is played on a course, and it is scored in the same manner as
regular golf. She pointed out that this was a fairly popular activity in Mounds View. She
indicated some community members have offered to assist with the realignment of the units, and
one objective is to place them in more visible locations, where they would be less likely to be
vandalized so frequently.
Ms. Blattenbauer stated the Parks and Recreation Commission is currently working on an
investment plan for the Park Dedication Funds. She indicated Finance Director Kessel has
provided the Commission with some suggestions, and they are currently considering investing
the $160,000 to $170,000, with hopes that they can utilize only the interest earned on that amount
for a few years, to pay for park improvements.
MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Marty. To Approve Staff s Recommendation for the Amount of
$3,415, to Come From Park Dedication Funds.
Ayes - 4
11. Next Council Work Session:
Next Council Meeting:
12. ADJOURNMENT
Nays - 0 Motion carried.
Monday, April 3, 2000 - 6:00 P.M.
Monday, March 27, 2000 - 7:00 P.M.
Acting Mayor Stigney adjourned the meeting at 8:48 p.m.
Transcribed and recorded by:
Trish Pearson
Timesaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.
•
MOUNDS VIEW CITY COUNCIL MEETING
• ~Qn n.R /~~~ D D o
Please sign in
NA ~l f': ADDRESS