Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - 2005/05/09r`--=~ • PROCEEDINGS OF THE MOUNDS VIEW CITY COUNCIL ~" ~ CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW ,~~,, RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA Regular Meeting May 9, 2005 Mounds View City Hall 2401 Highway 10, Mounds View, MN 55112 7:09 P.M. 1. MEETING IS CALLED TO ORDER 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. ROLL CALL: Marty, Gunn, Flaherty, Stigney and Thomas NOT PRESENT: 4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA A. Monday, May 9, 2005 City Council Agenda. • MOTION/SECOND: Gunn/Flaherty. To Approve the Monday, May 9, 2005 agenda as presented. Ayes - 5 Nays - 0 Motion carried. 5. PUBLIC INPUT William Werner, 2765 Sherwood Road, referenced the memo regarding the street project survey results stating that he has a written comment to submit from his son asking for clarification on the results of the surveys. City Administrator Ulrich stated that the survey results are on the agenda as Item 1l.bl, Street Project Survey Results. Barbara Haake, 3024 County Road I, stated that the Community really does appreciate that the EDA Commission and City Council listen to the Residents and take their input. She expressed concerns stating that she has never heard of a situation like this where the City doesn't have all the answers at this point in the process. She noted that this is the fastest track to push something through Mounds View that she has ever seen adding that it is her belief that Medtronic is a done deal. She referenced the EDA Commission meeting stating that the Medtronic representatives indicated in their presentation to the EDA Commission that they are fully funded for the traffic • reconstruction. She stated that residents are aware of the negotiations going on with respect to Mounds View City Council May 9, 2005 Regular Meeting Page 2 • the billboard contract, TIF and with MnDOT for the excess land. She stated that the golf course belongs to the Citizens and the Citizens should have been able to have a lot more input a long time ago, before it got as far as it has. Thank you. Duane McCarty, 8060 Long Lake Road, referenced the time limit restrictions for public comment stating that he understands that Council can apply reasonable restrictions when they have several people present who want to speak noting that he does not see the need to apply restrictions when the Charter was adopted for the Citizens of Mounds View. He stated that he does not have a problem with Citizens from other areas or Business Owners coming up and taking Residents' time to speak when it is in support of issues in Mounds View adding that this is where he would ask Council to apply the time limit restrictions. He stated that it is a given that businesses in the area would gain from such a proposal and statements from the Business Owners would be in support of the project adding that if the Business Owner is not a Resident and, their only interest is to gain more for their business, then they should step up to the plate and bring their own dollars, especially if they expect him, as a Resident, to pay for their gain. He referenced the Charter noting that in Section 1205 of the Charter City Council cannot sell one foot of land without being subject to City ordinance. He stated that it would require a 2/3 majority or 66-2/3 percent. He urged Council to be sure that they know what direction they are going first before making any final decisions. He stated that at the Town Meeting he heard that Council has made some sort of gentle person's agreement that if the majority rules, that the rest will follow. He expressed concerns stating that he disagrees with line of thinking. He stated that he wants his • Council Members to stand up and support this City and ensure that all checks and balances are in order. He stated that he would be very unhappy if this is what the Council has actually agreed to. Valerie Amundsen, 3048 Wooddale Drive, stated that two weeks ago she and her husband asked for clarification on an issue with Ordinance 723. She explained that it relates to the maximum amount that the City could charge residents for street improvements.. She stated that she would like Council or the City Attorney to address this issue and clarify as to whether the City is bypassing the ordinance. She expressed concerns stating that in last year's project the City actually did charge residents more than what is allowable by ordinance. She asked Council to look back and review to determine if Residents were overcharged and report back to the Community with their findings. Mayor Many explained that the ordinance includes two different formulas that could be used to calculate, $14.60 per foot or per unit. Ms. Amundsen acknowledged and asked Council to review the charges and update the Community as to what formula was used. City Administrator Ulrich asked the Public Works Director to clarify noting that he thought the amount had been adjusted, by resolution, for the project. Council Member Thomas clarified that an ordinance cannot be changed by resolution. • Mounds View City Council May 9, 2005 Regular Meeting Page 3 • Brian Amundsen, 3048 Wooddale Drive, stated that an email was sent this morning to Mayor Marty, Council Members Gunn and Thomas and City Administrator Ulrich that outlines the financial issues and concerns, as well as their request to recognize the Residents' desires for their neighborhood's look and feel. He noted that they asked City Administrator Ulrich to forward the email on to Council Members Stigney and Flaherty, as she did not have their email addresses. She assured Council that the Residents want to help solve the problem not continues to be an impediment. Dennis Hammes, 5511 Quincy Street stated that he has a petition to present to Council regarding violations to the noise ordinance and problems with speeding through their neighborhood. He presented the petition to Council and asked that they review their concerns. He indicated that everyone who signed petition is dead set against the Medtronic proposal. Mayor Marty acknowledged and accepted the petition stating that the City Council appreciates the Residents time and efforts. He stated that speed enforcement issues have been included on the agenda for the upcoming Council Work Session adding that this item would be included as one of the issues to discuss. Mayor Marty stated that parking restrictions and enforcement have also been included as an item for discussion at the next Council Work Session. He referenced the increase in parking along Quincy stating that the area in front of the school is a posted `no parking' zone during school hours. He stated that it is apparent that people are not adhering to the restrictions and there • doesn't appear to be much enforcement. He expressed concerns stating that the parking along this area cuts down on the visibility and creates a more dangerous atmosphere. David Jahnke, 8428 Eastwood Road, clarified that it is his understanding that the City took a survey of the Residents to determine what the Residents want and asked if it is correct that the survey results indicated that the Residents of Mounds View do not want the golf course. Mayor Marty clarified that the question was worded `Would you support redevelopment of the golf course if the redevelopment is paid out of the General Fund'. He stated that based on the answers the results showed that the Residents did not want the golf course. City Administrator Ulrich stated that three questions were posed in the survey. He reviewed the questions and clarified the results with the Council. Mr. Jahnke clarified that even if there is funding available, the majority of people do not want golf course. He noted that out of all three questions, none of the responses favored the golf course. Mayor Marty confirmed that the results show that the Residents are not in favor of the golf course if the golf course is subsidized from the General Fund. He noted that this would not be the case with negotiations and a contract with Clear Channel, as they would pay off and cover the funds. Mounds View City Council May 9, 2005 Regular Meeting Page 4 • Mr. Jahnke clarified the survey questions asked stating that the question he is asking is whether the Citizens of Mounds View want the golf course or not. He acknowledged the clarifications received on the survey results stating that he still has not gotten an answer to his question, is it true that the Citizens of Mounds View do not want the golf course. Council Member Flaherty explained that it all depends on the variables. He stated that the results show that if the funds for the redevelopment come from the Residents they do not want the redevelopment and if the funds do not come out of the Residents pockets 37-percent would want the redevelopment, half of the respondents want to remove it and the other half want to leave it. (golf course) Mr. Jahnke stated that the results show that 63-percent of the Residents do not want it and expressed concerns that the questions on the survey were not very clear. He clarified that he is not against the golf course- itself noting that he plans to review the tape. He stated that the results of the survey indicate that the Citizens of Mounds View, across the board, do not want the golf course. He acknowledged that this is a hard decision and suggested that Council base their decisions on the results of the survey. Mayor Marty agreed stating that the survey does give the Council an idea of what the Citizens want and do not want. He stated that he trusts that the Council would do what the Citizens say. He stated that the results are public record and copies are available for review. He assured Mr. Jahnke that Council bases their decisions on all of the information that is provided to them on an issue. Mr. Jahnke stated that he would like a poll of the Council to determine who would go with the survey results and who wouldn't. He stated that this would be a big test to see if the Mayor and the Council actually listen to the Citizens or not. Mayor Marty assured Mr. Jahnke that he and the Council take their position and decisions very seriously. He acknowledged that he is charged with making the best decision for the City and that he talks with various cities, realtors, and accountants, in order to get all of the facts before making his final decision on an issue. He stated that there are many factors involved besides money and this is something that the City Council should be able to get a handle on. 6. SPECIAL ORDER OF BUSINESS A. Proclamation -Building Safety Week -May 8 -14, 2005 Mayor Marty read the Proclamation declaring the week of May 8 - 14, 2005 as Building Safety Week 2005. He stated that this is sponsored by the International Code Foundation and provides an excellent opportunity to educate the public on the roles each agency plays in protecting the interests of the Citizens. He stated that it also takes the appropriate steps to ensure that the areas where residents work and play are safe. He called upon all Citizens to join their fellow • Americans to improve the safety for all Citizens. Mounds View City Council May 9, 2005 Regular Meeting Page 5 • 7. JUST AND CORRECT CLAIMS. Council Member Stigney asked if the Just and Correct Claims Report could follow the Consent Agenda, as he has questions on an item that is on the Consent Agenda that should fall under the Just and Correct Claims. He referenced page two, a $24,500 payment for Abbey Carpet and asked if the motion would supercede or should they pull the item for a separate vote. Council agreed to pull the Abbey Carpet payment from the Consent Agenda for discussion and a separate vote. Council Member Stigney had the following questions: Page 4, clarification on Champlain Planning Press, Inc., subscription for $115.00. Finance Director Hansen explained that this is to pay for a subscription to a Planning Commission Journal. Page 5, Custom Refrigeration Inc., what was the $30.00 repair for. Mayor Marty explained that this pays for the maintenance repairs on the icemaker at the Community Center. Page 5, G.C.S. Services, Inc., what freezer was repaired? Finance Director Hansen explained that the freezer is an appliance for the golf course and is used to store bulk foods. Ms. Burg further explained that the freezer was running hot and needed maintenance. Page 6, Hewlett Packard, Computer replacement. Finance Director Hansen explained that this is part of the budget. He further explained that the City has asix-year rotation program in place and • the City purchases ten computers per year and this request covers three of the ten computers budgeted for replacement this year. All of the computers that are to be replaced are desktop systems. Council Member Flaherty had the following questions: Page 7, Mast's Corporation, computer repairs. Finance Director Hansen explained that this is the old record system that was used by the Police Department. He further explained that this system is being phased out and replaced with a system from St. Paul. He stated that they plan to run the systems parallel to each other until the transition is completed. He stated that the new system was implemented last year and they plan to phase out the old system this year. Mayor Marty had the following questions: Page 4, Cintas Corporation, Uniforms and Towel cleaning. He asked if there would be a better rate with Airmark. Ms. Burg stated that she would research and compare pricing. She explained that Cintas brought them the new contract and she had explained to them that they could not sign off on the contract without City Council approval. Mayor Marty asked how they would be able to pull the check if this is passed on the Consent Agenda. He stated that they have thirty days to consider the contract noting that this was invoiced on Apri121, 2005 and if they wait until the next Council meeting, which is May 23, 2005, the contract would exceed the State Statute. • City Administrator Ulrich confirmed that if approved it would conflict with the previous vote. Mounds View City Council May 9, 2005 Regular Meeting Page 6 MOTION/SECOND. Thomas/Gunn. To pull Check 11396 for separate vote and to approve the Just and Correct Claims as amended. Ayes - 4 Nays - 1 (Stigney) Motion carried. MOTION/SECOND Thomas/Gunn To Approve Check 11396. Ayes - 4 Nays - 1 (Stigney) Motion carried. 8. CONSENT AGENDA Council Member Stigney asked to pull Items A, D, E and F from the Consent Agenda. He referenced Item 8A, Abbey Carpet's request for payment of the balance owed. He stated that Mr. Kopas was before Council stating that if Council accepted the bid that he would do his best to lower the bid amount of $74,500 adding that he does not see anything indicating that the bid was lowered. He stated that no explanations are included yet they are charging the full amount. He expressed concerns stating that this is a lot to spend without getting another bid for the project. He stated that he wants a Just and Correct Claims done on this adding that he does not support this, which is why he pulled it. Mayor Marty recalled that there was an issue on how or why the bid could not be lowered since the bid was already accepted. He explained that this was the only bid that came in and they did • get a better deal than the original bid. He stated that they did discuss carpeted kick panels instead of vinyl noting that this would have been an additional charge. He explained that the baseboards were not installed because the chairs would easily damage the baseboards. He assured the Council that they did get a superior carpet at no additional charge. Council Member Thomas stated that they did not get a breakdown of the work done by City personnel and the contractor's employees. She stated that they should get a breakdown. Council Member Flaherty asked if the City did provide any help in an effort to lower the bill. He stated that the City had clearly stated that they would help with the removal of the carpet in an effort to lower the bill. City Administrator Ulrich clarified that it was brought to Council that the City would get upgraded molding in return for the labor reduction. He stated that there was no direction given to lower the costs adding that he would check into it if Council wishes. Council Member Gunn stated that she distinctly remembers a conversation about the labor and that it would not happen because City staff did not have the time to do it. Council Member Thomas stated that she wants an official statement that shows the amount of time, what was done and who did the work. Mounds View City Council May 9, 2005 Regular Meeting Page 7 • City Administrator Ulrich explained that once a bid is awarded there are no further negotiations and changes to the bid are not allowed. Mayor Marty stated that the job has been completed now for several weeks and asked if they should pull this item and hold the check until they can find out if City Staff did anything to reduce the amount of the bill. Council Member Flaherty asked what the typical process is for making payments on a bill. Finance Director Hansen explained that they typically try to pay the bills within 30-days of the invoice or when the job is completed. He further explained that if there is a dispute on the billing the City can hold the payment for further clarification, otherwise, if there are no problems they must pay the invoice within the 30-day timeframe. Council Member Thomas that she would like a full breakdown on the invoice so that Council knows exactly what work was done by City Staff and by the contractor. She explained that she is not clear on what the bid applies to because they changed the work process and materials. Finance Director Hansen clarified that this is more of an issue with the City Staff than the actual job. He stated that he does not believe this would constitute a problem. • City Administrator Ulrich stated that he would have to clarify further adding that the direction given at that time was that they could not send back the molding and that the trade-off for City labor was not what was discussed with him. Council Member Stigney stated that he would not support this without further clarification. MOTION/SECOND. Marty/Gunn To Approve Item 8A, Final Payment to Abbey Carpet for Mounds View Community Center Carpet Replacement Project. Ayes-4 Nays-1 (Stigney) Motion carried. Council Member Stigney referenced Item 8D stating that he does not support hiring Mr. Manthis to this position. Mayor Marty stated that Mr. Manthis has been in this position, as an outside contractor, for several years adding that they have received very positive feedback. Ms. Burg stated that Mr. Manthis is at the top level as far as golf professionals go noting that he is retired and does sub-contract at the Bridges. She stated that he works at several courses and is very skilled. MOTION/SECOND. Gunn/Flaherty To Approve Resolution 6S 18 Golf Professional Services. . Ayes - 4 Nays - 1 (Stigney) Motion carried. Mounds View City Council May 9, 2005 Regular Meeting Page 8 Council Member Stigney referenced Item 8E and asked for an update on Mr. Manthis' background. Ms. Burg explained that Mr. Manthis is a high school teacher and the golf coach. She stated that this is not his first year at The Bridges noting that he also taught golf lessons last year. MOTION/SECOND Stigney/Flaherty To Approve Resolution 6519 Golf Professional Services. Ayes - 5 Nays - 0 Motion carried. • Council Member Stigney referenced Item 8F, clarified that employees would first qualify for these gift certificates after they reach 20-years of service and that the employee would receive a $100 gift certificate as appreciation for their service. He asked if this is a cumulative sum for every five years of service. Director Ericson clarified that the document was drafted to reflect that the payments would be paid to employees as a form of recognition when the employee reaches afive-year milestone of service. Council Member Stigney stated that he has a problem with this if it is cumulative. He suggested pulling this item and discussing at a Council Work Session, as it is a bit ambiguous. Mayor Marty noted that the City used to do a Sunset Cruise on Lake Minnetonka as a form of appreciation to the employees but stopped when it was pointed out that the City could be liable if an employee is hurt. He stated that it was decided at that time to provide a monetary form of recognition to those who qualified. He stated that this issue has already garnered a tremendous amount of discussion noting that it was passed in 2001 and was deemed the only legal way the City could acknowledge employees. Council Member Thomas clarified that the issue is funding the certificates with taxpayer dollars. She stated that she is fine with the resolution. Council Member Stigney stated that he wants to postpone the vote and discuss this issue at the next Council work session. MOTION/SECOND Stigney/Flaherty To approve postponing the resolution approving distribution of service appreciation certificates to employees having reached five-year employment milestones and discuss at the next Council work session. Ayes - 2 Nays - 3 (Thomas, Marty, Gunn) Motion failed. • Mounds View City Council May 9, 2005 Regular Meeting Page 9 • Council Member Flaherty clarified that he is not in disfavor of showing appreciation to employees adding that he does agree with Council Member Stigney on the frequency of payout and would prefer that the payout be done in ten-year increments. MOTION/SECOND Many/Thomas To Approve Resolution 6514 a Resolution Authorizing Distribution of Service Appreciation Certificates to Employees having Achieved aFive-Year Employment Milestone as of 2005. Ayes - 3 Nays - 2 (Stigney and Flaherty) Motion carried Council Member Gunn asked to pull Item 8H for discussion. Director Ericson noted that Finance Director Hansen did point out that it should be clarified that the surety would not accrue interest. He stated that a line would be included stating that the surety would not accrue interest and with that amendment he recommends approval. MOTION/SECOND Thomas/Gunn To Approve Resolution 6522 and waive the reading of the Resolution. Ayes - 5 Nays - 0 Motion carried. A. Removed for discussion and separate vote. • B. Resolution 6515 Adopting a Calendar for the Preparation of the 2006 Budget. C. Resolution 6516 Electing to Retain the Statutory Tort Limit on Liability for the 2005/2006 Insurance Policies. D. Pulled for discussion and separate vote. E. Pulled for discussion and separate vote. F. Pulled for discussion and separate vote. G. Removed. H. Pulled for discussion and separate vote. I. Licenses for Approval. J. Set a Public Hearing for 7:05 p.m., Monday, May 23, 2005 to Consider the Approval of a Comprehensive Land Use Amendment for the Bridges Redevelopment Site. K. Set a Public Hearing for 7:10 p.m., Monday, May 23, 2005 to Consider the Acceptance and Approval of the Final Draft of the Bridges Office Development Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) Document. L. Set a Public Hearing for 7:15 p.m., Monday, May 23, 2005 to Consider a Variance to Reduce the Front Parking Setback to Zero at Ace Supply Company Located at 4749 Old Highway 8. MOTION/SECOND. Thomas/Flaherty To Approve Items B, C, I, J, K, and L on the Consent • Agenda as presented. Mounds View City Council May 9, 2005 Regular Meeting Page 10 • Ayes-5 Nays-0 Motion carried. 9. COUNCIL BUSINESS. A. Resolution 6512 Approving Fire Vehicle Plans and Specifications and Resolution 6523 Authorizing Solicitation of Bids for two Fire Engines/Pumpers. C1 Mayor Marty stated that he would be willing to approve this item with the stipulation that if they decide to cut back and scale down that this would be included and that it states that the City's support would not exceed $350,000. The City would concur with an amount less than $350,000. Fire Chief assured Council that the bids would be reviewed by all three City Councils before final approval. He explained that the specs include a number of optional items and. assured Council that he plans to review the specs and flush out items that are not to be included. He stated that he would come back to Council for further consideration once all bids have been received. Mayor Marty referenced his conversations with Mr. Ryan, the Mayor of Blaine stating that I understood his concerns regarding the number of trips that could occur between the Cities. He stated that a vehicle of this type would be a Godsend to coordinate potential emergency scenarios. MOTION/SECOND. Gunn/Joe. To Approve Resolution 6512 Approving Fire Vehicle Plans and Specif cations and Resolution 6523 Authorizing Solicitation of Bids for Two Fire Engines/Pumpers. Ayes-5 Nays-0 Motion carried. Council Member Stigney asked for clarification on what a double din is and what they mean by high power. Fire Chief explained that they took the specs from the industry standard and provided a draft illustration to show what could go into the vehicle. He stated that he would review the document and clarify further in the final draft for their approval. He stated that he is currently working to acquire information on the fire equipment including warranty and maintenance issues. He stated that he would put together the information and provide for their review. MOTION/SECOND Marty/Gunn To Approve Resolution 6523 Authorization to Develop Final Specifications and Issuing Bids for One Command Vehicle for the SBM Fire Department. Ayes -5 Nays-0 Motion carried. • B. 7:05 p.m. Public Hearing to Consider a Conditional Use Permit to Add Two Additional Dwelling Units to a Multifamily Residential Building at 2071 Mounds View City Council May 9, 2005 Regular Meeting Page 11 • Hillview Road. Ms. Prososki stated that the applicants, Roger and Rosemary Dickhausen, are requesting approval of a conditional use permit to allow for two additional dwelling units at their multi- family residential building located at 2071 Hillview Road. She explained that the applicants are proposing to add two dwelling units to the basement of their existing four-unit building. She stated that the building would then have a total of six units, which is the maximum number of units allowed for a property zoned R-3, Medium Density Residential. She provide the Council with an overview of the square footage and parking requirements noting that they would have six covered and nine uncovered parking spaces, which would satisfy the parking requirements. She reviewed the Comprehensive Plan noting that the future use is for this area is multi-family and is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. She noted that this is also compatible with the surrounding area and assured Council that it would not cause an adverse affect on the neighbors. She stated that Staff received one comment against the project that expressed concerns about the potential increase in traffic and one comment stating that they are happy to see the improvements. Mayor Marty opened the public hearing at 8:24 p.m. Roger Dickhausen, Applicant, explained that they are looking to put atwo-bedroom unit on the west side and aone-bedroom unit on the east side. He stated that he is currently in the process of • getting bids for the project noting that he already has the architect and engineer. He noted that his neighbor to the west is the same type of six-plex building and reviewed with Council. Council Member Thomas asked what kinds of square footage increases are on the footprint for the garages. Mr. Dickhausen explained that the garage would be 49-feet by 21-feet, plus the additional parking. He stated that the Engineer has drawn up the plans for the infiltration pond to help keep any issues from developing with water drainage. Council Member Thomas referenced the swale and asked if they plan to lengthen or deepen it. Mr. Dickhausen stated that they would be installing an infiltration pond. He reviewed the measurements with Council noting that since the soil is quite sandy they do not believe that water drainage would be a big problem. He stated that he plans to go with what the Engineer is recommending. Mayor Marty stated that he did not see any mention of a drainage pond or Swale when he reviewed the Staff Report. He stated that he is glad to see that this is being taken care of proactively. Ms. Prososki explained that this is an existing swale and the plan is to enlarge it noting that this • may not be necessary, as it is covered by a drainage easement. Mounds View City Council May 9, 2005 Regular Meeting Page 12 . Council Member Flaherty stated that a Resident did come in to voice their opposition noting that their concern is that this type of housing attracts the wrong kind of people. Mr. Dickhausen questioned what was meant by the kind of people attracted to this housing stating that they have rented these units to college students from Bethel and Northwestern College for as long as they have owned this property. He assured Council that they have never had any problems adding that if he is not comfortable with the applicant he leaves the unit open. Ms. Prososki confirmed that the City has not had any ongoing enforcement issues with this property. Mayor Marty closed the public hearing at 8:29 p.m. MOTION/SECOND. Gunn/Flaherty To Approve the Conditional Use Permit to Allow for Two Additional Dwelling Units at a Multifamily Residential Building located at 2071 Hillview Road. Planning Case No. CU2005-004. Ayes-5 Nays-0 Motion carried. C. 7:10 p.m. Public Hearing to Consider a Development Review for a Retail Development at 2525 County Road 10. • Director Ericson stated that there are three individuals present this evening representing the applicant, Snyder's Drug Store. He stated that this is one of the first businesses that located in the Mounds View Square adding that the applicant wants to re-locate to a freestanding store. He provided Council with an overview of the proposed site noting that the Planning Commission recommends approval with some minor stipulations. He reviewed the stipulations with Council noting that the application does satisfy all Staff, City Code and zoning requirements. He stated that a building this size would require 47 spaces and reviewed the layout with Council. He stated that the building materials are similar to the rest of the community and reviewed the materials, proposed lighting and landscaping with Council He noted that the plans meet requirements adding that he plans to follow up on the tree types. He referenced stormwater management stating that they want the ponds located on City Hall property noting that at the time it was not approved and this was conveyed to the applicant. He stated that if the City agrees there should be some compensation. He indicated that there is a secondary possibility where the storm water management system could be installed underground adding that there is a way to handle onsite management if Council is opposed to the stormwater ponds being located on City property. He stated that this proposal would bring Snyder's out from within the Mounds View Square and would provide them with a more competitive advantage. He stated that Snyder's was the first store to locate here in Mounds View and noted that there is a very strong Community attachment to the store. Director Ericson stated that he would also like to discuss the County Road 10 Corridor Improvement Plan noting that currently it is consistent with the proposed plan. He stated that this is located closely to one of the City wells and feels that this is a benefit to the Community, as it would bring in a new building and a higher tax Mounds View City Council May 9, 2005 Regular Meeting Page 13 • incentive for the intersection. He noted that at the last Council work session Council had asked Mayor Marty opened the public hearing at 8:39 p.m. if Staff had considered any other design scenarios for the lot. He assured Council that several designs were considered noting that the applicant prefers the current configuration and wants Council to consider the proposal as presented. He stated that a trail way was discussed for the front of the property that would extend the trail down to the ponding area. He indicated that he discussed the trail with the Public Works Director adding that it is his recommendation that the City provide and construct the trail way. He stated that the applicant is ok with being assessed for the trail. He noted that there are still issues that need to be addressed noting that the City is supportive of the redevelopment but a few items should be included as a contingent. He stated that in closing, the Planning Commission has recommended approval of the site plan and agreed that the stormwater management issues should be addressed. Dave Leonard, Owner Synder's, stated that his store has been located in the Mounds View Square since 1974. He stated that two drug stores have been added since that time adding that their lease option is set to expire on September 3, 2005 and this would allow them the opportunity to consider relocating. He explained that he has to move the store in order to remain competitive. Valerie Amundsen, 3048 Wooddale Drive, stated that she reviewed the tape of the previous discussion noting that one item discussed was the water issue and drainage pond. She clarified • her understanding that the applicant is currently asking that the City provide the land to them free of charge. She expressed concerns stating that she would prefer that Council not allow this to happen as the land is partly her land as a city dweller. She asked what amount of acreage would be required for the pond. Director Ericson stated that the area is approximately a quarter of an acre. Ms. Amundsen noted that an acre of land near her recently sold for $160,000.00. She stated that this is a prime area for the City and is an asset that should be retained. Mayor Marty closed the public hearing at 8:43 p.m. Council Member Thomas noted that the resolution does not contain information pertaining to the additional property. Dave Leonard explained that they couldn't compare residential property values to commercial property values, as it is not comparable. Council Member Flaherty stated that his preference would be to look at the property for potential stormwater management versus a drainage pond on City property. He asked if an Environmental Study had been done. • Mr. Leonard stated that a Phase One and Phase Two Study had been done in addition to a Mounds View City Council May 9, 2005 Regular Meeting Page 14 • Contamination Study. Council Member Thomas acknowledged the competitive advantages noting that the new location would level the playing field and provide them with similar advantages to the corridor. Council Member Stigney referenced the dimensional requirements and setbacks and questioned how all the answers could be yes if this hasn't met all of the requirements. He stated that he is in favor of onsite water retention versus ponding and asked who would pay for the estimate and costs. Director Ericson agreed stating that this should have been corrected. He stated that this is also Staff's position. He stated that the possibility to acquire land at a fair market value was one of the items conveyed to and discussed with the applicant. Mr. Leonard assured the Council that he would be a good neighbor and would maintain the landscaping based on the requirements. Council Member Stigney referenced the zero setbacks and asked for further clarification. Mayor Marty stated that the Public Works Director has indicated that they have conveyed the landscaping requirements for the east side to the applicant noting that he is in support of the acquisition of the 15-foot strip to Snyder's. Director Ericson acknowled ed that Staff su orts this but it is not art of the resolution. He g pP p explained that the City couldn't legally require an applicant to purchase City land. He stated that it is his belief that adequate protection could be built into the agreement that states that the applicant would be responsible for maintaining the landscaping. Mayor Marty recalled that Staff did come to Council to discuss the stormwater ponds on City property. He stated that it was his recollection that when this issue was discussed it was under the context that the City would purchase the property. He stated that he would prefer to see the applicant control the water drainage on the property noting that there might be a need to re-do the design to accommodate a pond. He suggested that the applicant consider ways of controlling the water drainage on their own. Mr. Leonard clarified that Director Ericson was the one who brought up the idea of placing the drainage pond in this area. Director Ericson stated that the terminology should be clarified. He explained that the City was interested in the possibilities of what could happen on the site and confirmed that it was Staff's idea for the ponding. He stated that it was also conveyed to the applicant that this idea would require City Council approval. • Mayor Marty stated that when this was discussed with Public Works Director Lee he asked if he had any problems with the public runoff and it was stated that constructing a stormwater pond Mounds View City Council May 9, 2005 Regular Meeting Page 15 • would not be a big cost issue for City. He indicated that the bigger concern is to conserve City land until they absolutely need it. Mayor Marty noted that Mr. Leonard indicated that they did not have the option to move in the past, due to their lease. He noted that the lease is set to expire in September and asked Mr. Leonard if they would have enough time to build if this proposal is approved. Mr. Leonard agreed that it is a tight timeframe noting that there is a month-to-month clause included in the lease that could be utilized until the build is completed. Mayor Marty referenced the snow storage stating that there might be a need to reach an agreement with the City on snow removal. He asked what this would entail. Director Ericson agreed stating that currently there is no place for them to put the snow. He stated that the have anticipated this need noting that if they plow towards City Hall land the applicant would have to have an agreement to use City Hall land. He stated that currently snow storage has not been addressed on the site plan and suggested that the applicant review. Gerald Williams, C & H Development, stated that they have considered Rolland Swenson for the landscaping and reviewed the plans with Council. He stated that there would be one surplus parking space and Snyder's has indicated that they plan to utilize this area for snow storage, not • City property. He stated that if they were unable to utilize the surplus area the plan would be to remove the snow from the property using trucks. Director Ericson referenced Item 7 of the proposal; re-design of the color scheme, noting that this was something Staff added to the resolution. He stated that this could be struck, as there seems to be a theme in the constructed corridor. He explained that Staff felt it made sense to maintain the look utilizing earth tones. Council Member Stigney suggested softening. the colors. He noted that several trees are shown on the east side of the site yet the site plan shows a zero lot line with no room for trees. Mr. Williams explained that it was their thought that this was being a good neighbor by providing a tree line as a landscape buffer. He stated that the trees could be removed. He acknowledged that the trees would be located on City property and confirmed that they are volunteering to plant and maintain the trees as a buffer. He stated that this was offered in good faith to improve the looks of the area. Council Member Thomas noted building across street is in gray tones in addition to earth tones. Does not have problems with colors noting it would tie into the corridor just fine. Mr. Williams referenced the suggestion for onsite water storage stating that this would require them to add to the building structure. He clarified that they are now being directed to build a • basement-type space to store the water. He stated that this would add a substantial cost to the project. Mounds View City Council May 9, 2005 Regular Meeting Page 16 • Council Member Thomas clarified that no direction has been given to the applicant with regards to storm water. She stated that the City is willing to work with the applicant on this issue noting that she is very against the ponding. She stated that the City already has too much along the corridor already and they are not being maintained properly. She stated that she does like the development but does not want to see a pond in this area. Council Member Gunn asked what their options would be for stormwater management. Director Ericson stated that he has tried to set up a meeting with the Rice Watershed group to discuss the issue. He stated that several options are available noting that he would work with the applicant to try and put together an economical, feasible and appropriate resolution for this site. Mayor Marry asked where the trail would be placed. Director Ericson stated that they have proposed placing the trail in the County right-of--way and reviewed with Council. He stated that in the past the City has offered incentives to developers and businesses in the Community noting that there are some TIF eligibilities that could be passed back to the applicant. He stated that once the costs are determined they could submit an application for TIF assistance. . Mr. Williams stated that it has been a real pleasure working with City Staff. He stated that they did an analysis of the area when Snyder's finally made the decision to re-locate and based on the analysis rt was found that this would be the most logical option for them. He explained that he has run the numbers on the various options ten different ways noting that the demolition costs would be theirs. He stated that they found, after considering all costs for the project, that the economic impact for an underground water management system would be too expensive. He stated that the applicant would consider some form of a giveback to the Community if they can come up with different options. He stated that they would be prepared to add buffering and would be supportive of an assessment for the trail ways, walkways and holding pond areas. He stated that he wanted to bring this to the Council's attention noting that a lot of work has gone into this project. He stated that this is a brand new prototype for the City of Minneapolis and it would also be the first in the area. He stated that Mr. Leonard has tried to work out a reasonable lease option adding that it has been a very difficult process. He stated that question now is how to keep the economics in line so that Snyder's would have a viable option available to them. Council Member Thomas clarified that her concern is not an economic one. She stated that she does not want the water in this area adding that she would vote no to sell the land in order to keep the water off the land. She stated that this is a bad place for a holding pond. Mr. Williams acknowledged her concerns adding that they did not come with TIF grants. He assured Council that they are trying to create awin/win situation for all concerned. Mayor Marty agreed that this has been a difficult decision and acknowledged that Snyder's has been a good neighbor and steward of the Community. He explained that Council is trying to Mounds View City Council May 9, 2005 Regular Meeting Page 17 • make the pieces of the puzzle fit adding that they want to explore the storm water options to determine what is available and economically feasible. He stated that the emphasis is on them to the control the water, not the City. Director Ericson stated that currently there are two approaches City Council could take. He stated that Council could move to table the action pending more research on the position of the Rice Creek Watershed, or, Council could approve the resolution as amended and add a final clause that states that the approval would be null and void if the development agreement is not executed within six months of the date of approval. He stated that this would give the developers an opportunity to move forward and begin work. He stated that if they cannot come to an agreement on the stormwater management issue and noting is executed, this agreement would be null and void. Council Member Thomas agreed that the Council could approve the resolution tonight and work out the particulars at a later time. Mayor Many referenced Item 2 and suggested that the applicant prepare and receive approval of the onsite plan that incorporates an onsite water management system. Mr. Williams asked if it would be appropriate to include a reference `as approved by the Rice Creek Watershed.' Council Member Thomas stated that Item 2 could be edited and approved contingent on complying with Rice Creek Watershed standards. She stated that she is not in support of a stormwater pond on city property. She suggested approving the resolution now and move forward to complete the rest of the work that needs to be done. She stated that Council could move forward with the approval and have staff and the applicant continue to work on the stormwater conversion issue separately. Judy Cummens, 7729 Knollwood Drive, expressed concerns stating that if the gas station went under the City would be sitting with a property that looks worse than this. She asked how many people are interested in purchasing this land and doing all of the work needed to remove the tanks. She suggested working with them to come together on the best deal for all concerned. Council Member Stigney stated that the first page indicates that the Council has reviewed the documentation adding that this is not a true statement and should be removed. He stated that he also has questions on the trees and lot lines noting that this should not be approved until all questions have been answered satisfactorily. He expressed concerns stating that the applicant should not be allowed to plant trees on City owned property adding that he still has concerns about the ponding issue. Director Ericson clarified that Council has reviewed the stormwater options and agreed that the statement could be removed. He referenced the zero-foot setback stating that if Council supports • maintaining afive-foot setback that it is their prerogative to deny. He stated that they could include a stipulation that all landscaping would be provided on the subject land, not City Hall Mounds View City Council May 9, 2005 Regular Meeting Page 18 • property and that the applicant would be responsible for all maintenance. He stated that a draft development agreement could be written in such a way that adequate protections are put in place. Mayor Marty asked Director Ericson how soon he would be able to meet with the Rice Creek Watershed and Staff. Director Ericson stated that he could meet with both prior to the next meeting. He stated that he would schedule the meetings and provide Council with an update at the May 23, 2005 Council meeting. Mayor Marty stated that he does understand the need to create their own identity adding that he would like to see the colors toned down a bit, as it is the main business corridor in Mounds View. He stated that as far as the zero lot line, it was nice and thoughtful gesture noting that it would create a nice buffer. He stated that if approved the applicant would have to maintain this area. Mr. Leonard assured Council that they would maintain the property, including the mowing. Council Member Flaherty stated that he likes the color scheme and has nothing against them wanting to give the City trees. He stated that he wants to hear what Rice Creek Watershed has to say noting that his preference would be to do something onsite to manage the stormwater drainage. • Mr. Leonard stated that if this project is not approved that Snyder's would be leaving the area. He assured Council that there was no question on the possibilities of leaving, as he is losing money in the current location. He stated that it is his belief that the proposed location would give them a fair edge to compete. MOTION/SECOND Stigney/Marty To Authorize postponing action on Resolution 6524 until issues have been addressed with the Rice Creek Watershed and the developer can clarify the lot line, landscaping and color scheme. Ayes - 1 Nays - 4 (Marty, Thomas, Flaherty, Gunn) Motion failed. MOTION/SECOND. Gunn/Thomas To Approve Resolution 6524 and to Approve the Development Review for a Retail Development at 2525 County Road 10. Ayes - 4 Nays -1 (Stigney) Motion carried. D. Resolution 6513 Consideration of a Minor Subdivision at 8060 Groveland Road. Ms. Prososki stated that the applicant, Integra Homes, has applied for a minor subdivision of the property located at 8060 Groveland Road. She stated that the applicant is proposing to divide the back 271 feet from the existing lot. She stated that the existing house does meet with the setback requirements and the lot would be well inside the excess of the minimum requirements. She Mounds View City Council May 9, 2005 Regular Meeting Page 19 • stated that the survey does show the required parameters for the easements and satisfies the code requirements. Council Member Thomas asked if Integra Homes is planning to retain Parcel A or sell it. Ms. Prososki confirmed that Integra Homes plans to sell Parcel A. Mayor Marty noted that it states in the resolution that Parcel B must be platted as part of the subdivision within one year and if not, it would have to be included with the adjacent property in order to avoid an land-lock situation. MOTION/SECONI}. Gunn/Thomas. To approve Resolution 6513 Approving a Minor Subdivision of 8060 Groveland Road. Mounds View Planning Case No. MI05-003. Ayes-5 Nays-0 Motion carried. E. Resolution 6506 Adopting an Investment Policy Mayor Marty stated that Finance Director Hansen has been working on this policy for quite awhile adding that he did an excellent job with the last draft. He thanked Finance Director Hansen and Staff for a job well done on the Investment Policy. He stated that this is an excellent piece of work and thanked Finance Director Hansen for leaving the City with such a great piece of work. • Council Member Sti e asked if the olicies could be numbered for better identification. ~ Y p Finance Director Hansen explained that the policy would be numbered once it is approved. MOTION/SECOND. Marty/Gunn To Approve Resolution 6506 Adopting an Investment Policy and waive the reading. Ayes-5 Nays-0 Motion carried. F. Resolution 6511 Approving the Agreements for Financial Services with Ehlers & Associates and Springsted, Inc. for the Year 2005 Finance Director Hansen stated that there are certain tasks that have to be done each year that require a specialized skill set. He explained that a group that specializes in the specific areas should do the tasks. He stated that TIF reporting is a good example and recommended hiring a specialized group to do the TIF reporting this year and continue to have Springsted do the disclosure reporting. He stated that it would cost $1200.00 to do the TIF reports noting that Ehlers would bill for the actual time spent preparing the reports. He provided the Council with an overview of the costs for each of the reports. • Council Member Flaherty referenced the TIF reports and asked if they could use the same format as last year and update the numbers. Mounds View City Council May 9, 2005 Regular Meeting Page 20 • Finance Director Hansen explained the format of the report noting that it was created by the State of Minnesota and current year data has to be included. MOTION/SECOND. Gunn/Thomas To approve Resolution 6511 Approving the amended Agreements for Financial Services with Ehlers & Associates and Springsted, Inc. for the Year 2005. Ayes-5 Nays-0 Motion carried. G. Resolution 6517 Approving Step Increase for David Parker, Golf Course Grounds and Equipment Manager. City Administrator Ulrich read resolution 6517 Approving the Step Increase for David Parker. MOTION/SECOND. Gunn/Thomas To approve Resolution 6517 Approving Step/Longevity Adjustments for David Parker, Golf Course Grounds and Equipment Manager. Ayes-5 Nays-0 Motion carried. H. Resolution 6520 Approving the Sufficiency of Petition of the opposition of the 2005 Street Improvement Project. • Ci Administrator Ulrich stated that Resolution 6520 ado is the sufficienc of the etition. He ~' p Y p stated that when they reviewed the Charter the item to be assessed was the street improvement project. He stated that they found that the signatures on the list were valid noting that one signature could not be validated due to the fact that they are new property owners. He stated that the have the number of households required for the petition and to Staff's knowledge there are no such petitions circulating at this time. He explained that the time period referred to is the 60-day period and it runs to May 14, 2005. He stated that with respect to Spring Creek Pond, the storm improvements are not funded by special assessments but by stormwater fees. He stated that Staff is opposed to this due to the broad opposition of the petition. He stated that the Spring Creek Pond project would come back for a separate public hearing and could be reviewed at that time. He recommended that City Council move to adopt Resolution 6520, Approving the Sufficiency of Petition. Mr. Amundsen has agreed to assist and Staff will review what should be done to move forward with the process. Valerie Amundsen, 3048 Wooddale Drive, confirmed that the petition for the Spring Lake Pond is not binding, as it is not being accessed. She clarified that she and Mr. Amundsen are representing 96 residents from their neighborhood and noted that all of signed the petition stating that they do not want this pond in their neighborhood. She requested that Staff issue afollow-up • letter to the residents updating them on the status of the petition and to let them know that the petition was sufficient. She stated that people are asking how it went noting that not everyone is Mounds View City Council May 9, 2005 Regular Meeting Page 21 • able to view the meeting on cable. She assured Council that they were very careful in securing the signatures and verifying the residents of the neighborhood. She stated that they are very willing to help in any way they can to be of assistance through this process. She assured Council that they are not trying to cause any problems. Mayor Marty referenced Ms. Amundsen's request for afollow-up letter and explained that the City is currently trying to find ways to cut costs at City Hall. Council Member Thomas stated that if the City can do multiple notices to the residents regarding public hearings it would only be appropriate to issue one notice providing Citizens with a status on the petition. Council Member Stigney agreed that notice should be given to the petitioners updating them on what has been done with the petition and the action Council has taken. Council Member Flaherty agreed stating that it is also important to go back and determine if there is something they could do that would be more palatable to the Residents. He stated that it is important to let the Residents know what is happening. He acknowledged how important this issue is to the Residents and commended the Amundsens' for taking the time and action on this issue. MOTION/SECOND. Thomas/Stigney. To approve Resolution 6520 Approving the Sufficiency • of Petition of the opposition of the 2005 Street Improvement Project. Ayes-5 Nays-0 Motion carried. I. Resolution 6498 Adopting the City Vision and Mission Statement, Goals Program, Values Statement and Rules of Conduct. City Administrator Ulrich stated that this came forward as result of the March 2005 meeting with City Department Heads. He provided Council with an overview of the City Vision and Mission Statements noting that they have been placed in resolution format for adoption. He stated that comments have been included on each item for their review. Mayor Marty noted that all of this was read at the Town Hall Meeting, which is currently being aired and replayed on Channel 16. He explained that they began the Town Hall meeting with a Citizen Survey and moved on to the goals and values. He stated that Residents could also pick up copies of the City Values and Mission Statement at City Hall. He stated that he likes that they added the two new goals introduced by the Citizens at the Town Hall meeting. Council Member Stigney stated that the goals program is something that City Council should be determining at their retreat. He stated that based on the items discussed at the retreat, goals 11 and 12 were not part of that discussion adding that the goal priority order has changed depending • on what Council wants versus Staff. He stated that he has some problems with the weights given. He referenced the Rules of Conduct stating that Council has no authority of enforcement. Mounds View City Council May 9, 2005 Regular Meeting Page 22 • Mayor Marty stated that Item 8 is applied in different points. He does not agree with the form of criticism at the time and still stands with Item 8. He agreed that there was a difference of opinion adding that they should not publicly call each other names or publicly criticize any City employees or Staff members. Council Member Gunn agreed and suggested removing the verbiage `and discipline'. Council Member Thomas stated that they should remove the term `praise' from the statement adding that if anyone has a problem with anyone else the could take the issue to them privately. Mayor Marty agreed stating that they should strike the term `discipline' from the verbiage and reviewed. Council Member Flaherty agreed and suggested changing the name from the Rules of Conduct to Suggestion for Conduct. Council Member Thomas suggested adding the verbiage to value statements, leave the Goals Program clean and place the additional goals in with the Value Statements. Mayor Marty agreed and suggested incorporating both goals 11 and 12, as they also fit into the . current Value Statement. Director Ericson suggested adding goals 11 and 12 next year. He noted that there ~s an error on the Vision Statement and suggested incorporating the changes into the Mission Statement. He reviewed the changes with Council. MOTION/SECOND Thomas/Gunn To Approve the Resolution 6498 Adopting the City Vision, Mission Statement, Goals Program, Value Statement, Rules of Conduct with the amended verbiage, remove the word `discipline' from the. Rules of Conduct; and to postpone including Items 11 and 12 unti12006. Ayes-5 Nays-0 Motion carried. 10. APPROVAL OF MINUTES. A. City Council Minutes, Apri125, 2405 Council Member Thomas stated that she had the following corrections: • Page 2, line 26, Jim Wilson's address should be 1725 Pleasant View Drive • Page 6, line 6, name is Chuck `Sopher' • Page 7 and Page 9, the husband's last name was different than Stoltz, correct to right last name. • Mayor Marty had the following corrections to the minutes: Mounds View City Council May 9, 2005 Regular Meeting Page 23 • • Page 2, line 2, should read `stated that she would like to speak' • Page 3, line 15, clarified that he did not suggest a work session. He was just suggesting that the issue should be referred to an upcoming work session. • Page 5, line 4, should read `pets' not `pet' • Page 6, line 24, where it states `or remove a permit' need to add the comma. • Page 71ine 26, refers to the applicant as `they' and should be `Debra Stoltz' • Page 9, line 10, first sentence, first word, should be `He noted' that they are asking for an additiona160 days. • Page 9, line 24, where it reads `one of the neighbors stated' should read `Mr. Sopher stated' • Pagel 1, line 33, should read S.E.H. not SHE • Page l 1, line 10, Amundson should be Amundsen MOTION/SECOND. Gunn/Flaherty To approve the City Council Minutes of Apri125, 2005 as amended. Ayes-4 Nays-0 Abstain-1 (Stigney) Motion carried. B. Executive Session Minutes, Apri125, 2005 • MOTION/SECOND. Gunn/Flaherty To approve the Executive Session Minutes of Apri125, 2005 as presented. Ayes-5 Nays-0 Abstain-0 Motion carried. 11. REPORTS A. Reports of Mayor and Council Council Member Gunn stated that the City of Mounds View recently lost a wonderful gentleman by the name of George Carlson. She stated that Mr. Carlson was a very active member of the Community, specifically with the Boy Scouts. She stated that the children really looked up to him and enjoyed him tremendously. She stated that visitation for Mr. Carlson is scheduled for Wednesday, May 11, 2005, from 4:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. at the Holcomb Henry Funeral Home in Shoreview. She stated that the funeral services would be held at the Presbyterian Church of the Way on Thursday, May 12, 2005 at 10:00 a.m. She expressed her condolences to the family noting that Mr. Carlson would be missed dearly. Mayor Marty stated that George Carlson was also a member of the Mounds View Lions Club for 17 years and was also a member of the Lions Club for a time in New Brighton. He stated that Mr. Carlson was a huge asset and contributing factor to the City of Mounds View adding that Mr. Carlson volunteered for everything. He agreed that Mr. Carlson's loss would leave a huge hole in the Community. • Mounds View City Council May 9, 2005 Regular Meeting Page 24 • Council Member Gunn stated that on May 21, 2005 the Ramsey County Patrol Station plans to hold an open house in Arden Hills at 1411 Paul Crepeau Drive. She stated that the Open House is scheduled to being at 3:00 p.m. noting that refreshments would be provided. B. Staff City Administrator Ulrich announced that last Thursday, May 5, 2005, the Ways and Means Committee approved the verbiage provision fora $1 million payment for the 40-acres. He stated that this allows a window to the market before it goes back to the public. City Administrator Ulrich stated that the Street Project Survey Results were included in the meeting packet for Council review. Council Member Stigney asked if they have information to help determine if the neighborhoods are being contacted fox the project feedback. He asked what it would take to get a neighborhood included in the project. City Administrator Ulrich stated that he could provide the information and reviewed the survey process with Council. Mayor Marty explained that the survey was given to City Council the night of the Streets project work session and this would not take into account anything from that session. He reviewed the results with Council. Council Member Thomas clarified that this survey is merely a piece of the information and is to be used as guidance. She noted that the residents are not in a place where they are willing to accept anything that is given to them. She stated that they should begin from scratch. Director Ericson stated that he has an outstanding issue that he needs direction on from Council. He referenced the renaming of County Road 10 noting that the City of Blaine and the City of Spring Lake Park City Councils have voted on the issue. He stated that at their last discussion Council wanted this issue brought up at the Town Hall meeting noting that they received very good results. He stated that the name chosen the most by Residents was for Mounds View Boulevard, which came out on top with nine votes. He acknowledged that there is still some confusion out there and asked Council what they would like Staff to do next. Council Member Thomas stated that renaming it after a specific City could cause issues and encouraged Staff to continue pursuing consensus between the three Cities. Director Ericson stated that he would have follow-up conversations with the Cities of Blaine and Spring Lake Park and provide the Council with an update. C. Reports of City Attorney i NONE Mounds View City Council May 9, 2005 Regular Meeting Page 25 12. Negt Council Work Session: Negt Council Meeting: 13. ADJOURNMENT MOTION/SECOND. Stigney/Marty To adjourn the City Council Meeting of May 9, 2005 at 11:00 p.m. Monday, June 6, 2005 at 7 p.m. Monday, May 23, 2005 at 7 p.m. Ayes-5 Nays-0 Abstain-0 Motion • carried. Transcribed and recorded by: Bonnie Sullivan Timesaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.