Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - 2005/05/23 i~ i f ~~ - ;~~r , %~.~,_- PROCEEDINGS OF THE MOUNDS VIEW CIT~COUNCIL CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA Regular Meeting May 23, 2005 Mounds View City Hall 2401 Highway 10, Mounds View, MN 55112 7:21 P.M. 1. MEETING IS CALLED TO ORDER 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Girl Scout Troop 530 presented the flags and led the City Council in the Pledge of Allegiance. 3. ROLL CALL: Marty, Gunn, Flaherty, and Stigney NOT PRESENT: Thomas • 4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA A. Monday, May 23, 2005 City Council Agenda. City Attorney Riggs referenced Items 9A and 9B and suggested holding the public hearing but postpone the vote until the next City Council meeting. MOTION/SECOND: Gunn/Flaherty. To Approve the Monday, May 23, 2005 agenda as amended. Ayes - 4 Nays - 0 Motion carried. 5. PUBLIC INPUT David Jahnke, 8428 Eastwood Road, stated that he has been watching the EDA meetings noting that he understands that there are those who do love this golf course. He expressed concerns stating that the City took a survey of the Residents noting that 63-percent of the respondents do not want to keep the golf course. He stated that many of the residents in Mounds View are not present to voice their opinion but they did express their opinion through the survey and stated that they do not want the golf course. He noted the billboard contract stating that he does not know of another golf course in the City that has to be subsidized by another business and urged Council to go with what the people have already said in the survey. • Mounds View City Council May 23, 2005 Regular Meeting Page 2 • Brian Amundsen, 3048 Wooddale Drive, reported to Council that afollow-up meeting was held with Public Works Director Lee and City Administrator Ulrich to discuss the street projects. He stated that he is very encouraged by the progress and assured. Council that there would be good communication going forward. He thanked City Administrator Ulrich for inviting he and his wife to the meeting. Duane McCarty, 8060 Long Lake Road, expressed his agreement with Mr. Jahnke stating that a large number of the Residents did state that they do not want the golf course. He suggested that Council include the Survey as a discussion item on the agenda noting that 63-percent of the Residents also said they were in favor of keeping the golf course via the billboard contract, if it can turn a good revenue. Council Member Stigney stated that the actual wording of the survey would be discussed at the June 20~' meeting. 6. SPECIAL ORDER OF BUSINESS A. Resolution 6529, Resolution of Appreciation to Sergeant Jerry Johnson Mayor Marty read the Resolution 6529, Resolution of Appreciation to Sergeant Jerry Johnson. He stated that on behalf of the residents of Mounds View he would like to express their appreciation for Sergeant Johnson's 31 years of dedicated and devoted service to the City of Mounds View. MOTION/SECOND Gunn/Marty To Approve Resolution 6529 a Resolution of Appreciation to Sergeant Jerry Johnson. Ayes - 4 Nays - 0 Motion carried. B. Resolution 6535, Resolution of Appreciation to Charlie Hansen, Finance Director Mayor Many read the Resolution 6535, Resolution of Appreciation to Charlie Hansen, Finance Director. He thanked Finance Director Hansen for his dedicated and devoted service to the City of Mounds View. He presented Finance Director Hansen with a Plaque of appreciation noting that he came to the City of Mounds View during a tumultuous time and thanked him for all of his contributions. City Administrator Ulrich thanked Finance Director Hansen for all of the work he has done for the City of Mounds View. He stated that Finance Director Hansen has a lot of integrity and brought the City forward in many ways through f nancial planning, budgeting and reporting awards. He thanked him for a job well done. MOTION/SECOND Stigney/Flaherty To Approve Resolution 6535 A Resolution of Appreciation to Charlie Hansen, Finance Director. Mounds View City Council May 23, 2005 Regular Meeting Page 3 • Ayes - 4 Nays - 0 Motion carried. C. Resolution 6528, Approving a donation from William Siercks Mayor Marty read the Resolution 6528, a resolution approving a donation from William Siercks. He thanked Mr. Siercks for his donation of $200 to the City of Mounds View Police Department for the purchase of protective body armor. MOTION/SECOND Gunn/Stigney To Approve Resolution 6528 A Resolution Accepting a Donation from William Siercks. Ayes - 4 Nays - 0 Motion carried. D. Resolution 6542, A Resolution of Appreciation and Recognition of Mounds View Residents Marlene Kvitrud, Lauren Oman and Sarah Palzer. Mayor Marty read Resolution 6542, a Resolution of Appreciation and Recognition of Mounds View Residents Marlene Kvitrud, Lauren Oman and Sarah Palzer. He explained that Ms. Kvitrud, Ms. Oman and Ms. Palzer are all members of Girl Scout Troop 530 adding that they helped by donating their time and resources to a local women's shelter. He stated that they have also been named the recipients of the 2005 Girl Scout Gold Award, which is the highest award • given in Girl Scouts. He expressed the Council's appreciation to each for their hard work, dedication and devotion of service. He presented each with a Certificate of Appreciation from the City of Mounds View and commended them for their level of Community service and for giving back to the Community. MOTION/SECOND Flaherty/Stigney To Approve Resolution 6542 A Resolution of Appreciation and Recognition of Mounds View Residents Marlene Kvitrud, Lauren Oman and Sarah Palzer. Ayes - 4 Nays - 0 Motion carried. 7. JUST AND CORRECT CLAIMS. Council Member Flaherty had the following questions: • Page 2, clarify the payment to the City of New Brighton for $1,485.00. Finance Director Hansen explained that the payment was for the sales tax and vehicle registration for a pickup truck the City recently purchased. • Page 8, Hawkins, Inc. payment for $1,383.56, what kind of chemicals? Finance Director Hansen explained that it was payment for chemicals used at the Water Treatment Plant. Mayor Marty had the following questions: • Mounds View City Council May 23, 2005 Regular Meeting Page 4 • • Page 18, Kennedy and Graven, referenced the last two items, Waldoch Minor Subdivision and Meyer/Holmberg Minor Subdivision, stating that these have been paid and should be removed from the report. MOTION/SECOND. Marty/Gunn. To approve the Just and Correct Claims as presented. Ayes - 4 Nays - 0 Motion carried. 8. CONSENT AGENDA A. Schedule a Public Hearing for 7:05 p.m. on Monday, June 13, 2005, to Consider Ordinance 759, Amending Section 4.02 (Filing for Office) of the Mounds View City Charter. B. Resolution 6538, Approving a Contract with CorVel Corporation for Workers' Compensation Managed Care Services. C. Resolution 6539, Consideration of Application to Voluntary Investigation and Cleanup Program (VIC) for City Property known as the Former Sysco Property. D. Licenses for Approval. MOTION/SECOND. Gunn/Stigney To Approve the Consent Agenda as presented. Ayes - 4 Nays-0 Motion carried. 9. COUNCIL BUSINESS. A. 7:05 Public Hearing to Consider Resolution 6540, Approving a Comprehensive Land Use Amendment for The Bridges of Mounds View Golf Course Site. Director Ericson explained that this is to consider and review the proposed land use amendment noting that this should be limited to the public hearing with action being taken at the next City Council meeting. He stated that they have been actively exploring redevelopment of the area and the proposed land use designation would then be consistent. He stated that it was recommended in 2003 that the area should be industrial and in September the EDA recommended a review. He explained that within the Comprehensive Plan the land use currently is split between OSP and SRO noting that the designations are consistent with the land use for the golf course. He stated that the City asked RLK to help prepare a Comprehensive Land Use Amendment, which went to the Planning Commission for review and was recommended for approval. He stated that the proposed amendment was then forwarded to the Metropolitan Council for their review and approval and it was felt that what was proposed was consistent and addressed the possible expansion at the golf course. He stated that approval was recommended on April 27~`. He clarified that if the proposal were approved at a future meeting it would not obligate the City to • do anything with the proposed redevelopment at the golf course. He explained that the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Amendment would change the land use map to be consistent with Mounds View City Council May 23, 2005 Regular Meeting Page 5 • industrial. He stated that notices were sent to the Residents and also posted in paper. He asked that the motion be postponed until the next City Council meeting. Mayor Marty opened the public hearing at 7:43 p.m. Brian Amundsen, 3048 Wooddale Drive, clarified his understanding and asked if the City has a drawing of the area that would be re-designated? He noted that a portion of the area is supposed to include trails noting that he is curious as to whether the re-designation is for the entire golf course space or just part of it. Director Ericson explained that the area is partly designated OSP and SRO and reviewed the areas with the Council. He stated that the changes would make the areas consistent with the land uses to the north and northeast with the Sysco development. Duane McCarty, 8060 Long Lake Road, asked what the Planning Commission is recommending for this area. Director Ericson stated that the Planning Commission held a public hearing and unanimously recommended OFC. Barbara Haake, 3420 County Road I, referenced Statue 462.355 noting that it states that a governing body may, by resolution, adopt the proposed amendment and asked City Attorney Riggs if he felt they would have atwo-thirds vote to adopt next Monday. City Attorney Riggs stated he does not know. He stated that if they have a situation with six billboards, zoning should be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan noting that if it is not consistent that it could raise issues with the permits. Ms. Haake clarified that this would address an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan for MS462.355. She explained that she wants assurance that when they do vote that it is done with two-thirds of the membership, which means at least four members of the Council must be present. City Attorney Riggs confirmed that approval of the amendment would require atwo-thirds vote in order to be consistent with permits. Bob Glazer, 2625 Hillview Road, clarified that the Public Hearing was designated by the Planning Commission and asked if notice went to all Mounds View residents or only the neighboring residents. Director Ericson clarified that notices were sent to residents located 300-feet from the property and it was also announced in the local paper. • Barbara Haake noted that the notice was issued to residents within 350-feet of the property line and asked if this would be considered the same in this situation, as it states in Item 462.355 that Mounds View City Council May 23, 2005 Regular Meeting Page 6 all owners are supposed to be notified and with respect to the golf course, all of the Residents in Mounds View are owners. Mr. Amundsen asked if this covered the entire 72-acres. He asked if this would leave the space open for developing trailways and if all of the planning should include parks and trailways. He noted that part of the properly is wetlands and suggested designating the wetland area as a park versus OFC. He asked if it would make more sense to split the space to develop the park. Mayor Marty clarified that the total is approximately 115 acres and the golf course is 72.2 acres, some of which is wetlands. He explained that it should be designated now in order to keep it as a wetland because if the property were sold without designation the City would no longer have control over that portion of the property. Mr. Amundsen clarified that the City would have control of the wetland area if it were designated noting that with the designation it would require that any owner of the property would have to come before the Council to request approval of any proposed changes. He acknowledged that the Council does have good intentions and thanked them for the clarification. He stated that sometimes things are assumed and recommended that everything be as clear as possible up front. Mayor Marty closed the public hearing at 7:56 p.m. Council Member Flaherty expressed concerns stating that he is not anxious to designate all of the • acreage OFC at this time. Council Member Gunn asked where they were considering placing the trails. Director Ericson explained that the location discussed for the proposed trailway development would be located between the Sysco property and the development area of the golf course. He further explained that the City Council directed the Planning Commission to review the land use designation of the golf course with the desire to make the property consistent with current zoning. He stated that the OFC land use designation would be consistent with the industrial zoning, including the wetlands. He stated that if they want to designate the wetlands as un- developable properly that the City Council could rezone the area back to a park zoning. He noted that they did eliminate the PF district. He acknowledged Mr. Amundsen's suggestion regarding the billboards on the properly adding that at this point it would be more work not to adopt the OFC designation. Mayor Marty noted that it shows in the Staff Report that the City of Mounds View has been actively exploring redevelopment opportunities at the golf course noting that this is all news to him. He stated that he was a part of the City Council last year and does not recall hearing anything about this until early last fall. He noted that Cresa Partners approached the City in July 2004 and asked if City Staff was marketing the golf course at that time. He noted that it also states under the recommendation that the name be removed and amend the maps if the ~ • amendment is approved. He expressed concerns stating that he was not aware that they had made a decision to remove the City golf course from the Comprehensive Plan at this time and if Mounds View City Council May 23, 2005 Regular Meeting Page 7 • they amend the Comprehensive Plan to reflect this, would the City then be out of compliance with their own Comprehensive Plan. Director Ericson clarified that this is not suggesting that the golf course would be out of the picture. He stated that early in 2004 there was a lot of discussion as to what the City could do with the golf course. He stated that at the time of the discussions they did not know about the billboards yet. He stated that the current Mayor at the time, Mayor Linke, had urged Staff to think about and review all options available noting that many were considered. Mayor Marty acknowledged the discussions and asked what would happen if the amendment were made now and the City Council or EDA decides in the future that this would not be in the City's best interest. He explained that the City has been approached by two developers interested in developing the golf course area with some form of housing. He expressed concerns stating that if they were to make this amendment and something happens where Medtronic does not go through, they would have to re-amend. He suggested holding off on any decisions with this resolution until they know what they are going to do. He noted that in the Community Development Committee Report, dated April 18, 2005, under transportation it states that preliminary indications show, as of March 31St, that a variety of funding sources has been identified. He stated that it indicates that agencies are working cooperatively to ensure that the necessary road improvements are in place when Medtronic opens the new facility in September 2007. He noted that the funding for the second phase of improvements has not been identified and there would also be busing issues in this area. He stated that the Metropolitan Transit would • pick up at Medtronic and MTC would have to work together with Medtronic to determine the pickup points. He agreed that it does appear that this has taken a life of its own without any City Council action and even with the resolution it doesn't seem to leave the City with an out. Director Ericson explained that the reason they decided to go forward with the zoning is because the area is not consistent with the Comprehensive Plan for the City, as required by State law. He stated that the Planning Commission considered all possible designations and felt that housing would not be an appropriate Land use due to the surrounding industrial land uses in Blaine. He further explained that they felt that OFC would be the most appropriate designation. He stated that Staff recommends moving forward with the amendment if the City has to take action in order to be consistent with zoning. He noted that either way, there would be additional expenditures if they want to change the land use designation from what the Planning Commission has recommended. He referenced a letter received recently from the Metropolitan Council on affordable housing stating that the City has met and exceeded the Metropolitan Council's housing goals for the Last ten years. He stated that the City is very affordable and satisfies all of the Metropolitan Council's guidelines for affordable housing. He stated that it is no secret that an AUAR was created in connection with the land use and reviewed with Council noting that all of the work Staff has done has been on the direction of Council. He assured the Council that Medtronic is not a done deal and acknowledged that there is an association to what has been proposed. Duane McCarty, 8060 Long Lake Road, stated that according to State law Item 462.357, in • reference to authority, clarified that the Planning Agency, for the purpose of carrying out the policies, may prepare the proposed zoning. He clarified that the City adopts a Comprehensive Mounds View City Council May 23, 2005 Regular Meeting Page 8 • Land Use Plan to get a -good view of where they want the Community to go and to then bring the zoning ordinance into compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. He expressed concerns stating that this is the first time he has seen a zoning ordinance guide the Comprehensive Plan and asked if they could do a moratorium or place a hold on this. County Representative stated that the City Council does have the option but there are restrictions in place from the legislation. He explained that if an inner ordinance is adopted the City could call a moratorium to conduct the study. Mr. McCarty urged the Council to do this and give the City a chance to breath. Bob Glazer expressed concerns about the stormwater runoff and asked if the excess quota generated would relate back in any way to the street and gutter improvement project. Mayor Marty acknowledged Mr. Glazer's concerns stating that to his knowledge he does not believe that it relates back. Mr. Glazer asked how the City plans to take care of the water management plan with the proposed project. He explained that the golf course was installed as a way and means of helping to manage the water runoff in this area. City Administrator Ulrich explained that they have not gotten into that level of detail yet noting • that the Watershed would dictate the stormwater management process. He further explained that the runoff would have to be rerouted and ponded, onsite, in different locations. He stated that this has not been worked out yet from an engineering perspective. Barbara Haake noted that on January 19, 2005 the land use amendment was first introduced. She noted that it states that a public hearing was to be scheduled for February 2, 2005 and asked for clarification on the exact wording the Planning Commission gave as their recommendation to City Council on what the zoning would be. Director Ericson reviewed the Planning Commission's motion with Council stating that it concludes that The Bridges site should bear future land use designation of OFC. He further clarified that when it states re-development it is because the golf course is already a developed property. Ms. Haake stated that she wants to be sure that the billboards are consistent noting that they could have removed the whole bottom portion of the parcel where billboards are located and subdivide. City Attorney Riggs explained that the proposal was for six billboards across the property and slicing off a portion of continuing use land would have been very difficult to do. • Director Ericson explained that the reference to MnDOT is because they are the permitting agency and they are the ones that control. the Federal Highway Beautification Act. Mounds View City Council May 23, 2005 Regular Meeting Page 9 • Ms. Haake asked if they could have zoned 41 acres as light industrial versus the entire 72 acres. City Attorney Riggs stated that the application was done as a whole area in order to be consistent with MnDOT. Mr. McCarty asked if the exact verbiage used in the first enabling resolution putting the EDA in place is still in the original format. He asked if there are any implementing controls and organization for the EDA that are still intact. He stated that the EDA should be able to show that they have used every avenue open to them to address all concerns at the local level. He stated that he would like to have this information to ensure that every avenue possible has been explored. He requested copies of the resolution and the Planning Commission's recommendation for the ordinance. Council Member Stigney stated that it is his understanding that the verbiage is still in the original format. Mayor Marty assured the Residents that either way, the City wants to do this the right way, whether the development occurs or not. He stated that comments made requesting a moratorium have been received noting the continuation of the EDA public hearing to June 20, 2005. He stated that the City and Council have received a lot of calls from Residents asking to speak on the issues and asked that the Residents hold their comments until the June 20~' meeting. He assured • the Residents that he has his own concerns and has to remain cautious and careful. He stated that the Council wants to provide everyone with their opportunity to speak on the issues. He stated that he is still somewhat uncomfortable with the final wrap up of the resolution adding that he would like verbiage incorporated that states should the development not proceed that this would remain same. Director Ericson stated that the resolution could be amended or revised. Council Member Stigney expressed concerns stating that he does not want to revert it back to where the City would be unable to do anything with it and he does not want to go to the other extreme where it excludes all other options. Mayor Many clarified that he would like it stated that they are not removing the designation of The Bridges, but word it to state that the designation could be changed. B. Public Hearing to Consider Resolution 6541, Accepting and Approving the Final Draft of The Bridges Office Development Alternative Urban Areawide Review Document. Director Ericson stated that this is a culmination of the AUAR process. He explained that this serves the purpose of looking at the environmental aspects and impacts on a parcel. He stated • that the City authorized RLK to prepare the AUAR documentation noting that it was prepared and then sent out to the Regional Stakeholders for their review. He stated that many comments Mounds View City Council May 23, 2005 Regular Meeting Page 10 were received noting that most of the issues were with the transportation. He explained that the focus of the AUAR was to look at how they could mitigate the impacts. He stated that as a result of the discussions and meetings an amendment was prepared and provided to Council on April 22, 2005 for their review. He stated that they had a second comment period and received comments back noting that RLK's response to the comments are included in the packet for Council review. He stated that the AUAR is complete, final and ready for adoption at this point. He stated that Staff is requesting that this action be delayed noting that Council's acceptance and adoption of the AUAR document does not obligate the City. John Dietrich, RLK, stated that he worked with Staff to prepare the AUAR and amendment. He stated that the AUAR does require that a public agency reviews every five years and provides a status, over a 20-year period. Director Ericson explained that this document would guide the redevelopment process if they want to redevelop the property in twenty years. He stated that with whatever the Council determines, this document would serve a valid purpose for the next twenty years adding that they should address the Comprehensive Plan. Mayor Marty opened public hearing at 8:42 p.m. John Dietrich, RLK, indicated that Director Ericson's summary was brief in terms of the amount of the study and analysis for these two documents. He stated that the AUAR document should go • forward whenever a development is considered. He clarified that the AUAR does not obligate the City to proceed, it only studies the broad range for environmental impacts and provides a working document that allows subsequent applications/documents the ability to move forward based on the findings. He stated that it was a prudent choice to do this, as it provides the opportunity to weigh what would happen with developments. He stated that it would also allow the City to know what would happen if a certain amount of development went into this area. He noted that the AUAR is not user specific or site plan specific. Bob Glazier referenced the transportation plan and asked if the plan considered the amount of traffic this would generate through the City. Mr. Dietrich explained that the Transportation plan reviewed the area of potential impact noting that they worked with the City, MnDOT, Anoka and Ramsey County to determine what intersections should be reviewed. He stated that there was a tremendous amount of area reviewed and factors considered included what they are today; what would happen if there were no development in the area; and what would happen if Phase 1 or Phase 2 moved forward. Mayor Marty noted that in a letter dated May 20~' that addressed transportation issues it was found that Anoka County's transportation projections were incorrect and because of this they decided to go with MnDOT's numbers. • Ms. Haake asked if they addressed transportation as it relates to the airport today and the projected use by Medtronic. Mr. Dietrich confirmed that they did and reviewed. Mounds View City Council May 23, 2005 Regular Meeting Page 11 • Ms. Haake asked if this information would be included on the City website. She explained that she helped to author the Bill on runway lengths with Kennedy and Graven. She indicated that they also have a letter that guarantees that nothing would be done with the north/south runway. She expressed concerns with Medtronic possibly wanting to fly out of the Anoka airport and the size of their corporate planes. She suggested having the Metropolitan Airport Commission come back and change the determination based on the size of the Anoka airport. She asked if they have future projections for Medtronic available for review. Mr. Dietrich stated that in terms of airport growth, corporate jet sizes or potential expansion, they did check with the MAC and the FAA on items such as protected air space and future capacities but they did not look at the expansion of the airport. Mayor Marty noted this is also a concern of his as he has seen Medtronic's influence. He referenced the moratorium at the Anoka airport noting that Medtronic does have a lot of clout and the law could be changed. He noted that the law preceding the current law in place restricted the airport to a minor status in the guide and the MAC has the power to change the guide. Brian Amundsen, 3048 Wooddale, asked if the AUAR is a comprehensive list or checklist that the City Council should be following or asking of Staff during a development or re-development process. He asked if the index could be placed on the website for residents to review. He stated that he had requested a timeline of the project approximately 30-days ago and has not seen • anything yet. Director Ericson explained that the AUAR is intended to look at the impacts of development in a broad perspective. He further explained that the AUAR looks at the transportation component; impacts to transportation, wildlife, and infrastructure in order to bring utilities to the site. Mr. Amundsen clarified that this sounds like a checklist that Staff should follow, as it could have a direct impact on the City either economically, environmentally or both. He explained that his concern is what are they doing to the environment or wetlands adding that if these questions aren't answered how can Council move forward. Director Ericson stated that the amendment to the AUAR document is a review of the impacts and a mitigation plan. He stated that the amendment addresses how they would deal with the impacts and how they would mitigate the impacts. Mr. Dietrich further clarified that it could be considered a checklist for both City Council and Staff, as it provides the information needed to weigh the specifics of a site. He stated that the AUAR looks at the site in a raw state and provides Council and Staff with the absolute knowledge of what is actually located on this site. He explained that this is the document a developer would come in and review to determine what is located at the site and what could be done on the site. He stated that the AUAR is a working document and is very comprehensive in • the questions asked and answered. Mounds View City Council May 23, 2005 Regular Meeting Page 12 Mr. Amundsen asked if this addresses public services. Mr. Dietrich stated that it does not address the needs based on square footage noting that a request was put out to all City Staff Department Heads to provide comments. Mayor Marty asked if the study is still available for viewing at library. Director Ericson stated that he would check and if not he would make sure a copy is there for public review. He stated that he would also include a copy on the City website. Mayor Marty closed the public hearing at 9:08 p.m. Council Member Flaherty stated that he sees this as a tool that provides critical information as to what is going on in the area. He found the comments included to be very interesting and referenced the transportation issues. He stated that the general growth in this area has been faster than what the current freeway system can handle. He stated that it is recommended that both the City and County determine available options to improve transportation and provide better mobility. He expressed concerns regarding the potential increase in traffic through the City noting that Mounds View is not the only City involved in this major re-development. He stated that the TCAAP project in Arden Hills in addition to projects in New Brighton and Shoreview would have a definite impact on the road systems and should be included in these considerations. He stated that they should determine who is responsible for payment as developments occur and the roadwork is done. Council Member Gunn stated that US Highway 10, County Road J and 35 are all part of the big scheme of things with the 35W Coalition. She stated that US Highway 10 has been discussed for a long time noting the need to expand is being pushed up to go as far as County Road J. She indicated that this was also on the books to be redone due to the growth in the area. Mr. Dietrich stated that the AUAR document did what it was supposed to do by bringing together the various agencies and to have this group of agencies focused on a specific area. He stated that issues were identified and solutions have been put together to resolve them. He acknowledged that it does take funding and resources to make it all happen noting that the entire region has a lot to gain from the discussions of the AUAR. C. Public Hearing to Consider a Variance Appeal to Reduce the Front Parking Setback to Zero Feet at Ace Supply company Located at 4749 Old Highway 8. Director Ericson stated that the applicant is proposing to expand the property on the east side of the lot to zero feet. He stated that 30-feet of green space would remain and reviewed with Council. He stated that there was a deficiency of parking on the site and based on City Code, requirements would be 112 parking spaces. He acknowledged that there is a huge discrepancy in • what is there for parking and what is required. He stated that the Plan was presented to the Planning Commission and a public hearing was held noting that it was determined that there was Mounds View City Council May 23, 2005 Regular Meeting Page 13 . not a sufficient hardship to award the variance. He explained that the request has to satisfy the seven criteria outlined in City Code. He indicated that a letter was provided to Council from Greg Lehn, Ace Industrial Supply that provides Council with further background to the request. He stated that the site plan shows a different circulation of trucks on the site noting that several parking stalls were penciled into the plan on the west side of the lot noting that they would be removed and pushed up against the building. He stated that trucks would not continue through to the new parking area. He stated that Staff presented the proposal to the Planning Commission and presented a resolution recommending denial. He stated that the Applicant has filed an appeal and is present to answer any questions. Mayor Marty opened public hearing at 9:20 p.m. Bruce Hasselbrack, Applicant, noted that when they first submitted their proposal they thought it would be a simple extension of the blacktop out to the front with no egress or exit to Old Highway 8. He explained that the hardship is that they have 44 spots and have several trucks moving through the area. He stated that due to the increased size of the trucks it has become difficult for customers to navigate around the trucks. He stated that this situation is also impacting their neighbors in a negative way and they are trying to make it work but it does not work, as it should. He stated that with they are trying to improve the area with the appeal and reviewed with Council. Curt Anderson, Dale & Anderson Architects, stated that the proposal is a way to relocate the cars . out of the way of the truck traffic. He stated that it was their thought that this would be a good resolution to free up the traffic between buildings. Director Ericson explained that the photographs provided do show a large open green space area and right of way. He stated that the City of New Brighton was asked to comment with respect to stormwater management. He stated that the City of New Brighton responded that they did not feel that this would be an issue given the amount of green space that would remain. Mayor Marty closed the public hearing at 9:27 p.m. Council Member Stigney reviewed the seven items of criteria with Council stating that it does not appear to warrant the hardship and reaffirmed that the Planning Commission has recommended denial of the request. Council Member Flaherty acknowledged that they are trying to come up with an effective, alternate solution. He stated that he does understand the issues. and concerns and suggested reviewing the type of trucks coming into the location. Mr. Hasselbrack reviewed the truck types with Council stating that because they are a wholesaler they get their materials brought in by the truckload, delivered by over the road type trucks, in addition to delivery trucks with tractor-trailers attached. He noted that some of the trucks come . directly from the factories. Mounds View City Council May 23, 2005 Regular Meeting Page 14 • Council Member Flaherty suggested that the applicant contact their distributor and request that they send a smaller size truck for the deliveries. Mr. Hasselbrack explained that due to the economics of the trucking industry they would not be able to utilize the smaller vehicles. Council Member Gunn stated that the Council has granted this type of variance request before for homes and other businesses and suggested that they look at it as a way of being user friendly with the business community. She acknowledged the zoning laws and the Planning Commission's point of view noting that the variance would make it easier for the business. Mayor Marty noted that according to City regulations the area would still be short by 63 parking spaces. He acknowledged that Mr. Hasselbrack has indicated that they only use about 25 spaces yet the City feels they are still too short when it comes to parking spaces. He clarified his understanding that the Council does have the authority to grant the variance noting that it is the responsibility of the Planning Commission to review the hardship criteria and make their recommendations based on the criteria. He stated that this type of request has been granted in the past noting that some have met the criteria, but not all have. He acknowledged that the applicant has not met many of the requirements and clarified that they are requesting a zero lot line. He stated that he does like it that they are saving the two trees by re-routing the parking lot to wrap around the trees. He acknowledged that the applicant would like the variance due to the fact that the current parking is an inconvenience, but, the request does not meet the criteria outlined for • granting a variance request. Mr. Hasselbrack explained that it is a daily hardship and that it would allow the trucks better space to maneuver by eliminating some of the parking spaces. He assured Council that this would not impact anything out to Highway 8 adding that it is very difficult to operate today and does not anticipate that it would get any better with time. Mayor Marty asked if they have considered moving their sign. Mr. Hasselbrack stated that they had not considered that as an option. Mayor Marty asked if there was a setback designated for signage. Director Ericson stated that the setback is designated for 15-feet. Mayor Marty noted that there is a pathway in front of the property and asked how far back the easement goes for Ramsey County. Director Ericson stated that the right-of--way goes right to the property line and if the County were to expand Old Highway 8, a street could end up located in this area. Council Member Stigney suggested looking at the layout to see what they could do that wouldn't • bring it to a zero lot line. He suggested bringing the plan back for further review by the Council, as the application has not met any of the seven criteria. Mounds View City Council May 23, 2005 Regular Meeting Page 15 Mr. Hasselbrack stated that they do meet some of the criteria and reviewed with Council. He stated that this is the only option available to them to gain viable space, as they are landlocked and not able to move to further south. Council Member Stigney stated that they could not support the request if there are no other options available to consider. He stated that the Planning Commission has reviewed and determined that none of the criteria has been met to justify the hardship. Mayor Marty asked the applicant how long they have been at this location and if their business has grown considerably, which is the reason for this request. Mr. Hasselbrack stated that they have been at this location since 1999 and confirmed that they have grown some since that time. He stated that they have been dealing with the problem since 1999 and would like to have it resolved. MOTION/SECOND Stigney/Gunn To approve the Planning Commission's recommendation for denial of Resolution 6544 for Ace Supply Company's request for a variance appeal to reduce the front parking setback to zero feet primarily on the basis that the application does not meet the criteria for improvement. Ayes - 3 Nays - 1 (Gunn) Motion carried. • D. Resolution 6537, Approving the Acquisition of Taz Forfeited Property for Purposes of Stormwater Management. Director Ericson stated that the City received notification from Ramsey County on two forfeited parcels located in the northwest part of the City. He stated that a map of the area is attached for Council review noting that one parcel is a legal, developable lot and the other is an Outlot intended for stormwater management. He stated that Staff is recommending that the City acquire the parcels. He stated that the pond does go over the property line into a triangular lot not that the City does have easements on the lot. He stated that Staff is recommending that the City acquire use of the deeds for these two lots and send letter to Ramsey County indicating the desire in order to alleviate any potential disputes that these two parcels could be developed. Mayor Marry clarified that the parcels would be owned by Ramsey County. Director Ericson confirmed that the parcels would continue to be owned by the State, Ramsey County would manage the taxes and would be allowed to use the property. He indicated that he spoke with the County and it is his understanding that the fees would be less than $300. Mayor Marty agreed that as they begin to redo and fix the roads there would be a need to contain the water and since these sites are already being used in an unofficial way to retain water it would • seem to be a good idea for the City to retain the control of these parcels. Mounds View City Council May 23, 2005 Regular Meeting Page 16 • MOTION/SECOND. Gunn/Stigney. To approve Resolution 6537 Approving the Acquisition of Tax Forfeited Property for Purposes of Stormwater Management. Ayes - 4 Nays-0 Motion carried. E. Response to Innovative Images Letter of may 3, 2005 Mayor Marty stated that he spoke with Jerry Linke briefly about this item and he was not aware that this would be on the agenda. He suggested moving this item to the next City Council agenda. City Administrator Ulrich suggested postponing this item for 30-days to allow the City Attorney time to clarify the issues and place it back on the agenda. Mayor Marty asked how much work would a re-evaluation involve. City Attorney Riggs stated that he is not aware of any major changes in the conditions since the last time this was addressed and assured Council that the re-evaluation would be a very straightforward process. F. Resolution 6534 in support of Consolidation of 911 Dispatch Services in Ramsey County. • Police Chief Sommer stated that Resolution 6534 concerns the 911 Dispatch Services. He explained that currently the City contracts with Ramsey County for the 911 Dispatch Service and budgets approximately $60,000.00 per year for the services. He stated that Ramsey County is currently in the process of consolidating and have proposed to take over the 911 dispatches for all of Ramsey County and assume the costs for the service. He explained that the amount Mounds View would pay for the service would be incremented over an eight year period to zero noting that the City wouldn't have to pay for the 911 services out of the City tax dollars. He stated that the County would charge the City for the usage noting that a formula has not been determined yet to determine how the services would be billed. He explained that this resolution would appoint the City Administrator as the negotiator on behalf of the City of Mounds View with Ramsey County. He stated that the City of St. Paul did approve the consolidation noting that he does not know, at this time, if Maplewood or White Bear Lake plans to join the consolidated center. Mayor Marry asked if they have computed the costs yet noting that it sounds as if it would cost the City more. Police Chief Sommer stated that costs would be covered by County tax dollars not City tax dollars. He indicated that the formula that ultimately would be used could result in more dollars going towards the service. He explained that the costs would shift from the City to the County and confirmed that it could end up costing the Citizens more money. Mayox Marty asked if there would be a fee charged if a citizen calls the 911 services. Mounds View City Council May 23, 2005 Regular Meeting Page 17 Police Chief Sommer stated that no fees would be charged for calling 911. Mayor Marty asked if this is something the City has to do or they won't have 911 services. Police Chief Sommer confirmed stating that the City Administrator and City Council could voice their concerns but the consolidation would take place as planned. City Administrator Ulrich explained that this shifts the burden to the County tax levy noting that suburbs are now picking up more than the share they had before. He stated that the actual impact to tax payers would be greater as they are picking up the dispatch for the City of St. Paul. He stated that they should re-figure the formula used. Council Member Gunn expressed concerns regarding the potential impact on efficiencies and call answering. Police Chief Sommer explained that there would be one center and it can be designed to work very efficiently. He assured Council that it is not a huge issue noting that the Dispatch Policy Committee would be the Committee reviewing how the service is being delivered and would determine how the center would be structured in the future. Mayor Marty asked if the Council has to take action on this issue right now. • City Administrator Ulrich clarified that the Council does not have to take action right now. He stated that Staff has asked the County to provide further information on the potential impacts to the taxpayers and the information has not been received yet. Mayor Marty moved to postpone the decision. Council Member Stigney asked Police Chief Sommer if there were any problems with the structure of the resolution verbiage. Police Chief Sommer stated that he has no problems with the structure of the resolution Mayor Marty rescinded the motion to postpone the vote. He stated that he would like to see at least one Mayor and one City Council Member, per City, involved or represented on the Board that oversees the delivery of the service once it becomes operations. He stated that his concern is equal representation for all Cities. MOTION/SECOND. Flaherty/Gunn To approve Resolution 6534 regarding the Consolidation of 911 Dispatch Services in Ramsey County. Ayes - 4 Nays-0 Motion carried. • Mounds View City Council May 23, 2005 Regular Meeting Page 18 • G. Resolution 6530 Approving aStep/Longevity Increase for Officer Jeremy Hellpap (5/26/05). Mayor Marty read resolution 6530 Approving the Step Increase for Officer Jeremy Hellpap. MOTION/SECOND. Gunn/Flaherty To approve Resolution 6530 Approving Step/Longevity Increase for Officer Jeremy Hellpap (5/26/05). Ayes - 4 Nays-0 Motion carried. H. First Reading of Ordinance 759, Amending Section 4.02 (Filing for Office) of the Mounds View City Charter. • Director Ericson stated that on March 10, 2005 City Council adopted a resolution, which puts the suggested amendment into the Charter. He explained that the intent of the resolution is to clarify the language and filing fees. Mayor Manly asked for clarification of the ordinance amendment. City Attorney Riggs explained that it is a process that allows the gathering of signatures to be placed on a ballot or could be used for hardships and it could be done at no cost or fee. Mayor Marty explained that the Council couldn't take action on this issue tonight, as it has to be a unanimous vote. City Attorney Riggs confirmed that final adoption would have to be a unanimous vote. MOTION/SECOND. Stigney/Gunn To postpone the introduction and reading of Ordinance 759, Amending Section 4.02 (Filing for Office) of the Mounds View City Charter and establishing a filing fee to the next City Council Agenda. Ayes - 4 Nays-0 Motion carried. I. Resolution 6526 Approving the Purchase of Two Replacement Video Decks for the Cable Department. • Ken stated that this is based on an item discussed at the last City Council work session. He explained that they currently have two video decks .that are no longer working and they have been replacing the current video decks with digital video decks due to the quality and durability.- He stated that the prices have also gone down noting that it does make sense to replace the decks on an as needed basis. Council Member Flaherty confirmed that this would serve their needs for the next five years noting that the last set of equipment lasted for eleven years. Mounds View City Council May 23, 2005 Regular Meeting Page 19 . MOTION/SECOND Gunn/Stigney To Approve the Resolution 6526 Approving the Purchase of Two Digital Video Players for the Cable Department. Ayes - 4 Nays-0 Motion carried. J. Resolution 6527 Approving the purchase and installation of a replacement Document Camera, Projector and Screen for Council Chambers. Ken noted this was discussed at the last City Council work session noting that there is a real need for this equipment. He explained that currently the Council has to use a TV monitor, located in the lectern, to view presentations and with this equipment viewing would be easier and better for both the audience and Council. He explained that the zoom control on the current camera does not work adding that the newer cameras are now made with remote control capabilities. He stated that the equipment is basically inexpensive to purchase and based on the service and estimates Staff is recommending that they purchase the equipment from DS Productions and also have them install the equipment. Council Member Stigney asked what they plan to do with the old equipment. Ken stated that the City has several options: keep the projector for use in other locations, as it is a portable projector and does work well, CTV has expressed an interest in some of the old equipment, they could sell the camera for a good price; or they could give the Citizens an opportunity to purchase via flea market; or they could check with the installer to see if they would take as a trade-in. Council Member Stigney stated that this is too pricey and he would not support the purchase. MOTION/SECOND Gunn/Flaherty To Approve the Resolution 6527 Approving the purchase and installation of a replacement Document Camera, Projector and Screen for Council Chambers. Ayes - 3 Nays - 1 (Stigney) Motion carried. K. Resolution 6531 Appointing Mary Tatarek to be Interim Finance Director and Authorizing Additional Compensation for Working Outside of Job Classification. Finance Director Hansen explained that with his departure it is necessary to make arrangements for the operation and management of the department until a new Director is hired. He stated that several options were discussed and it was decided that the best alternative would be to utilize the Financial Consultants in the various areas. He stated that Mary Tatarek felt she could take on the budget duties and day-to-day supervision and utilize outside consultants on other issues. He stated that the individual doing the work should assume up to 75-percent of the job and it is his • recommendation that additional compensation should be authorized for the additional responsibilities. Mounds View City Council May 23, 2005 Regular Meeting Page 20 Mayor Marty stated that he had an exit interview with Finance Director Hansen and they discussed the financial software used by the City. He stated that the application is antiquated and hard to read noting that Ms. Tatarek spends most of her time on this software verifying and checking information. He stated that the Finance Director suggested upgrading the system noting that an upgrade would free up time and as far as management of the system, it would be less hands-on. He noted that the research to find the software and implement could take up to 24 months adding that it is in the new CIP that the Finance Director identifies a new software application. MOTION/SECOND Stigney/Gunn To Approve the Resolution 6531 Appointing Mary Tatarek to be Interim Finance Director at 10-percent additional to her Base Pay and Authorizing Additional Compensation for Working Outside of Job Classification. Ayes - 4 Nays - 0 Motion carried. L. Resolution 6532 Authorizing the hire of a replacement Police Officer and promotion of a Police Sergeant to fill the vacancy created by the retirement of Sergeant Jerry Johnson. Police Chief Sommer noted that Sergeant Johnson's retirement is effective May 31, 2005 adding that his retirement creates a vacancy that he would like to fill internally by using the Police Eligibility List to promote internally and open the replacement as an entry level patrol officer. MOTION/SECOND Gunn/Flaherty To Approve Resolution 6532 Authorizing the Hire of a Replacement Police Officer and Promotion of a Police Sergeant internally through the use of the Police Eligibility List to Fill the Vacancy created by the Retirement of Sergeant Jerry Johnson. Ayes - 4 Nays - 0 Motion carried. M. Resolution 6536 Authorizing Additional Audit Services from MMKR. Finance Director Hansen stated that he has been auditor since 2001 and has been working on this years audit. He explained that normally Staff would do all of the preparation work and production of the Financial Report but with his departure the gap should be filled. He explained that it was his intent to have the draft completed before leaving but time did not permit it. He explained that this resolution would allow MMKR to review the report, make the changes, copy, present and distribute the report. He reviewed the hourly rates with Council noting that the Audit Manager would be $130.00 per hour and Staff administrative support would be billed at $40.00 per hour. He stated that June 30, 2005 is the deadline for all Cities to submit their financial reports and MMKR is willing to contact and request an extension to complete the audit due to the current circumstances. Mayor Marty expressed concerns stating that the tone of the letter received seemed to be very clear that the report had to be there by June 30, 2005. He asked when they would find out if Mounds View City Council May 23, 2005 Regular Meeting Page 21 • MMKR could get the extension. Finance Director Hansen stated they were late with the report every year for the last five years. He stated that many Cities are going through a conversion process noting that State aid funds could be held up if they are late with the report. Council Member Flaherty asked how long MMKR has done the audits. He stated that he would like MMKR to put together an estimate of hours. He stated that he does not want just an hour rate quoted; he would like to have an estimate of the total hours and dollars. Finance Director Hansen stated that they did the audits from 2001 to 2005. He stated that he would request an estimate from MMKR. Council Member Stigney expressed concerns about an open-ended agreement stating that he would also like MMKR to provide an estimate. Mayor Marty expressed concerns regarding the time constraints stating that someone should be working on this as soon as possible. He stated things could be held up significantly if they put off the decision for another two to three weeks. City Administrator Ulrich suggested requesting a letter from MMKR that includes an estimate of hours and approve the resolution with the understanding that if they exceed hours estimated • MMKR would have to come back to Council for approval of any additional hours or expense. MOTION/SECOND Gunn/Marty To Approve Resolution 6536 Authorizing Additional Audit Services from MMKR. Ayes - 4 Nays - 0 Motion carried. N. Resolution 6533 Authorizing The Bridges lOt6 Anniversary Celebration Ms. Burg stated that The Bridges golf course has been big place in the Community and they would like to celebrate the fact that the golf course is going into its tenth year. She stated that they are considering a rollback of prices back to 1995 and reviewed with Council. She stated that several things have been considered as a part of the anniversary party including games and food. Council Member Flaherty noted that the Anniversary Celebration is currently scheduled for a Friday and suggested that Saturday would be more appropriate, especially if they want to bring in more patrons. Ms. Burg noted that Saturdays are usually quite busy and this could bring in more business on a Friday. She stated that they are open to doing it anytime but Friday worked the best. • MOTION/SECOND Marty/Flaherty To Approve Resolution 6533 Authorizing a rollback of the green fees for The Bridges 10t1i Anniversary Celebration. Mounds View City Council May 23, 2005 Regular Meeting Page 22 • Ayes - 4 Nays - 0 Motion carried. O. Resolution 6543 Resolution Approving a Revised 2004-2005 Police Officer Contract. City Administrator Ulrich noted this item was missed as an oversight and is being included as a resolution revision because it was intended as a part of the severance section for the Police Department. He stated that the additional language is consistent with the Police Sergeant and they want to include in the local contract. Council Member Stigney asked why they want to exclude the cash options. City Administrator Ulrich explained that the main reason is because the union wanted it out. He stated that the benefits were non-taxable for existing employees and if they only have the option for a savings plan it would not be considered as a taxable benefit. He stated that they are trying to encourage employees to take the Retirement and Health Savings Plan with this language change. Council Member Stigney suggested leaving it up to the employee as to whether they would like to have it or not. City Administrator Ulrich stated that the employees want the recommended language. MOTION/SECOND Gunn/Flaherty To Approve Resolution 6543 Approving a Revised 2004- 2005 Police Officer Contract. Ayes - 4 Nays - 0 Motion carried. P. Schedule a Special meeting with the Charter Commission to discuss Charter Commission Requirements. City Administrator Ulrich stated that this was suggested at the last Council meeting. He stated that Council expressed the desire to sit down and get re-familiarized with the City Charter; it's purpose and compliance. He stated that the proposed dates available are June 6 or July 14. The Council agreed to meet tentatively on Monday, June 6, 2005 at 7:00 p.m. 10. APPROVAL OF MINUTES. A. City Council Minutes, May 9, 2005 Mayor Marty stated that the May 9, 2005 City Council Meeting Minutes would be presented at • the next City Council meeting on Monday, June 13, 2005 Mounds View City Council May 23, 2005 Regular Meeting Page 23 11. REPORTS A. Reports of Mayor and Council Council Member Flaherty suggested that the Council discuss the necessity of an English class for the minutes, especially when reviewing punctuation. He stated that he would like to discuss if this is necessary or should they review only for content. Mayor Marty stated that in the past if Council Members had more than two corrections they wrote them down and turned them into the Recording Secretary to be incorporated into the minutes. Council Member Stigney stated that he has a problem with this option because the City Council would not have reviewed the changes prior to approving the minutes. B. Staff 1. Public Works Quarterly Report City Administrator Ulrich stated that Public Works Director Lee was not available for the meeting this evening and suggested rescheduling or provide comments to take back to the Director. • Mayor Marty had the following requests for update or clarification: • City Hall rehab project. He referenced the last line noting that it states construction would begin near the end of September or early October. He stated that it seems like a long way off and he would like to get some of the issues, especially the mold issues, resolved. He expressed concerns noting that City Employees have been breathing this stuff for years. He noted that this is one of the reasons why the Finance Director is leaving is due to the poor air quality in the building. He stated that he would like to make a pledge that this is addressed as soon as possible. • Trunk highway noise wall noting that the current Transportation status shows the project is being termed as Phase 1 with an anticipated completion in 2007 and Phase 2, Interchange improvements, with an anticipated completion in 2011. He stated that in Phase 2, MnDOT anticipates the addition of a third lane on eastbound Highway 10. He stated that Staff is recommending discussion on these items in late summer. He clarified that if MnDOT has this in their plans to add another lane wouldn't the costs be on MnDOT with no cost to the City. He stated that he would like to hold off on this to see what MnDOT does first. • Silver Lake Road Sidewalk Project noting that based on the preliminary data, the bottom line is that Staff anticipates a Spring 2006 construction for this project, if it should proceed. He stated that Ramsey County has some problems with the setbacks on the side of the road because the do not want a sidewalk up against the curb. He stated that they do want to continue to keep pushing this forward. • Referenced the third paragraph from the bottom, the holding pond at Woodcrest Park, and • asked why the City did not receive the credits when they took the park down and created the Mounds View City Council May 23, 2005 Regular Meeting Page 24 pond in 2000. He stated that he would like to know why the City did not receive the credits and who is responsible for making sure this was taken care of. • Staff plans to provide the City Council with an update and report on the 2005 Street Project at the July 5, 2005 Council work session. He indicated that Staff has to go back to the drawing board to rework the project noting that Staff is anticipating implementing this project in 2007. • County Road 10 redevelopment and revitalization plan - He asked of a status and whether the surveying has been finished. He expressed concerns stating that he wants to keep this going. o Director Ericson stated that all of the groundwork has been completed, all analysis is done and they have looked at all of the existing street signals at the intersections. He assured Council that they are moving forward. o City Administrator Ulrich stated that he would provide Council with an update noting that the City needs to pursue the safety and improvements of Highway 10. • Spring Creek Regional Quality Pond - at the present time, the two property owners affected were not originally willing but are willing now. He stated that they have voiced their intentions stating that if the City did not act they would be installing new drives and landscaping. He stated that this should be looked into to get it moving forward. He noted that this was also contingent on the street project from last year with respect to controlling some of the water in that area. o City Administrator Ulrich indicated that the last time this was discussed they talked about sending out status notices on the project. He stated that he spoke with Public Works Director Lee and he highly recommends sending out a final notice to provide a status of the project. He stated that he would like to send out the final letter with the update. Council Member Stigney stated that the petition stopped the pond and asked what it is that they plan to send out. City Administrator Ulrich stated that this was on the petition but that it did not apply to the project as the petition was sufficient. City Attorney Riggs explained that the petition was for the assessment of the project and that is the authority in the Charter to utilize this process. Mayor Marty asked City Administrator Ulrich to review the issues he has outlined with Public Works Director Lee and provide the Council with an update. Brian Amundsen stated that he was also included in the meeting on the Street Project. He stated that part of the issue Council is still facing is on the financing. He stated that in the meeting they discussed ways to engage other groups in order to come up with a better solution. He stated that he would like to remind people that the Spring Creek project still has to go through the 60-day public comment period. He noted that they had 97 signatures of people that do not want to see the wetland disturbed in order to install a holding pond. He stated that if Council is still considering moving forward with the sediment pond they would still have a very angry . neighborhood. Mounds View City Council May 23, 2005 Regular Meeting Page 25 • 2. Police Department Quarterly Report Police Chief Sommer provided the Council with an over view of the Quarterly report from January through. March 2005. He provided the Council with an overview of the response time to 911 calls, arrests and citations issued. He stated that the traffic issues are a high priority for the Police Department and reviewed the crimes reported to the State. He stated that they have an Officer currently employed as the School Resource Officer, which provides a balanced approach to juvenile crime matters in the City. He stated that they also have an Officer assigned to the D.A.R.E. Program and the department also participated in the Safe and Sober Programs, a grant program through the State. He reviewed personnel changes noting that Officer Bob Nelson was promoted to Sergeant effective May 1, 2005. He provided Council with an overview of the drug arrests noting that meth use is widespread and one of the toughest drug issues to address. Council Member Flaherty stated that he received call from Dan expressing their appreciation for the work that the Police department does. He noted that the juvenile offenses went up 60-percent and asked to get staff up to speed. Mayor Marty stated that the only calls he has received are from residents saying that they are happy to see the increased level of enforcement. He stated that the more police presence in the Community helps people pay more attention to their speed. Brian Amundsen asked if hiring two new officers has helped the department and what have they • been involved in. Police Chief Sommer confirmed that it has helped noting that their focus has been on increasing the level of traffic enforcement. Director Ericson provided the following Community Development update: • County Road H2 -was in litigation on this project, potentially 66 townhomes. He stated that in 1977 the passed an amendment prohibiting townhomes and last year the Judge ruled on the hardships noting that they could build as long as certain conditions were satisfied including correcting the drainage issues, getting a permit, constructing a swimming pool and a tennis court. He stated that they have applied for the Watershed permit and they have had the wetland delineation done on the property. Staff is currently out verifying noting that they also need to do soil borings. He stated that the applicant is planning on clearing some of the trees later this week to allow a rig onto the site to take six soil borings in the general area. He stated that this is the last item that the Rice Creek Watershed wants as a part of the permit process. He stated that Staff would send out notices to the property owners to let them know what is going on. He stated that he would provide a copy of the report and the notices sent to residents for their review. • The City has received a proposal from Sysco. He explained that they have a parking shortage and want to add 50 semi-truck parking spots and approximately 100 regular parking spots. He stated that they are proposing to acquire 3-acres of City owned land and also plan to • relocate the ponding. He indicated that one problem would involve a future land use amendment issue, a rezoning issue and a re-plat issue. He stated that they are currently Mounds View City Council May 23, 2005 Regular Meeting Page 26 • seeking financial assistance with this project and will provide Council with updates as more information becomes available. • Snyder's -They have been working on the site plan, tweaking the plan to allow for an onsite storage for water management. He stated that they were able to pull the parking back from County Road 10 to allow for a swale. • City sent a letter to the City of Blaine and Spring Lake Park in support of the naming of County Road 10 as Mounds View Boulevard. He stated that the City of Coon Rapids has recommended Coons Rapid Boulevard and as an alternative Mounds View Boulevard. He suggested bringing this back before Council as they need to take action and update the residents. C. Reports of City Attorney • NONE 12. Negt Council Work Session: Nezt Council Meeting: 13. ADJOURNMENT Monday, 3une 6, 2005 at 7 p.m. Monday, June 13, 2005 at 7 p.m. Council agreed by consensus to adjourn the City Council Meeting of May 23, 2005 at 11:40 p.m. Ayes - 4 Nays-0 Motion carried. Transcribed and recorded by: Bonnie Sullivan Timesaver Off Site SecretaYial, Inc. •