HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - 2005/09/26PROCEEDINGS OF THE MOUNDS VIEW CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA
APpRpVE~
Regular Meeting
September 26, 2005
Mounds View City Hall
2401 Highway 10, Mounds View, MN 55112
7:02 P.M.
1. MEETING IS CALLED TO ORDER
Mayor Marty advised there are currently some problems in broadcasting the meeting Live but it
will be taped for later broadcast.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
3. ROLL CALL: Many, Stigney, Gunn, Flaherty, and Thomas
NOT PRESENT: None.
•
4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
A. Monday, September 26, 2005 City Council Agenda
MOTION/SECOND: Flaherty/Gunn. To Approve the Monday, September 26, 2005 agenda as
presented.
Ayes -5 Nays - 0 Motion carried.
5. PUBLIC INPUT
William Werner, 2765 Sherwood Road, stated that a while ago the Medtronic property was to be
signed over but he has now heard rumor that it was shifted to another date.
City Administrator Ulrich explained the closing of the property has to be scheduled to coincide
with all documents that need to be processed. A number of documents had to be gathered and
f nalized by .the City Attorney and Medtronic attorney so the closing date was moved from
September 23 to September 30. He noted that Agenda Item 8H will address additional items that
need to occur prior to the closing and, if the closing is held on September 30, 2005, a special
Council meeting will need to be scheduled.
•
Mounds View City Council September 26, 2005
Regular Meeting Page Z
• Mr. Werner asked if the delay is on the City side. City Attorney Riggs explained the City had to
wait for the deed from the State of Minnesota. That deed was just received today so it is ready to
close on September 30, 2005.
Duane McCariy, 8060 Long Lake Road, advised that a number of citizens, many of them
petitioners on Chapter 760, have formed a nonprofit corporation, the Mounds View Citizens
Taxpayers Association. He introduced Association officers as being Vice Chair Ken Glidden,
Second Vice Chair Dennis Hammes, Treasurer Connie Hammes, Secretary Barbara Haake,
Director at Large Ed Benson, and Director at Large Mary Kay Walsh (who was not in
attendance). Mr. McCarty asked Secretary Haake to give the mission statement followed by his
closing statement.
Barbara Haake, 3024 County Road I, stated the Mounds View Citizens Taxpayers Association
mission statement and the primary purpose of this corporation is to protect, preserve, and up hold
the principals of self governance and participatory democracy embodied in the Mounds View
City Charter and to ensure that the Mayor, City Council, and other elected and non-elected
officials of the City of Mounds View uphold and comply with the provisions of the Mounds
View City Charter in the performance of their official duties and responsibilities. She provided a
copy of an August 31, 2005 memorandum she had prepared for the Council's consideration,
explaining that it provides greater detail of what this is all about.
Mr. McCarty stated they have formed a 501 C4 corporation under the State of Minnesota laws
• and in accordance with the mission statement, retained an attorney to represent them in a law suit
against the City over Ordinance 760 referendum issue. Mr. McCarty advised that a complaint
will be filed in the morning in district court.
Tori Johnson, 7730 Long Lake Road, stated she would like to suggest that Mounds View
improve its website. Ms. Johnson explained that after the storm of last week, surrounding city
web sites contained information on emergency storm information. However, the Mounds View
web site did not contain storm information. She stated she had talked to City Administrator
Ulrich earlier tonight about this matter. She stated she found it embarrassing that there was no
communication with citizens about the storm information.
Connie Hammes, 5511 Quincy Street, reported the Petition Committee has submitted an
additional 11 sheets with 41 individual signatures, thereby making sufficient the collection of the
989 signatures required for sufficiency on Ordinance 760. Ms. Hammes stated her opinion that
they did not really need to do that because she found that 77 signatures should have been made
correct and, when added to 945 signatures, that would have been sufficient. Ms. Hammes stated
she is wondering if City Administrator Ulrich was the person responsible, and if so, why the
Council voted him a raise if that is what he did to 77 residents. Ms. Hammes provided the
Council with a copy of her information.
City Administrator Ulrich stated Staff is in the process of validating the additional signatures that
• were received in the office. In accordance with the Charter, there are five days for the City
Administrator to report back to the Council.
Mounds View City Council September 26, 2005
Regular Meeting Page 3
• of the surve done indicating that
David Jahnke, 8428 Eastwood Road, reminded the Council y
almost 60% of the people wanted to get rid of the golf course. He noted there is a small group of
people who think otherwise and while he respects their opinion, he wants to remind the Council
of the survey. Also, residents elected the Council to do the job for Mounds View and the
Council has a duty to run the City because they have been elected to do that. Mr. Jahnke stated
he thinks the Council is running the City in good fashion.
Ken Glidden, 5240 Edgewood Drive, asked the Council to look at the petition filed because it is
not about the golf course. The issue is with the financing and the deal given to Medtronic that
short changes the citizens of Mounds View for 25 years. He stated that is far more important
than the golf course that has been on the table for five or ten years. Mr. Glidden restated it is not
about the golf course but the tax burden that is being put on the shoulders of the tax payers and
off the shoulders of Medtronic.
Councilmember Stigney stated it is his intention to lift the tax burden from the resident's
shoulders by bringing in Medtronic.
Mr. Glidden stated a lot of information has come forward that the income coming in is a "spit in
the wind" compared to if Medtronic paid their full tax as he does.
Councilmember Stigney stated he disagrees with Mr. Glidden's comments and will see what the
• Council can do with it for the residents.
Ed Benson, 5108 Long Lake Road, stated everyone has heard about the deal at every meeting but
the deal was taken before anyone knew the City would give away the golf course and saddle
residents with Tax Increment Financing for 25 years. He stated that made a big difference for
Mounds View residents and the Council should know that.
6. SPECIAL ORDER OF BUISNESS
A. Proclamation Proclaiming October 2005 as Toastmaster Month in the City of
Mounds View
Mayor Marry read in full a proclamation proclaiming October of 2005 as Toastmaster Month in
the City of Mounds View and presented it to Lori Higgins.
Lori Higgins, representing Toastmasters International, stated they are proud of their group and
she is pleased to receive this recognition.
B. Proclamation of Appreciation for the Hard Work and Dedication of City
Staff during the September 21, 2005 storm
• Mayor Marty read in full a proclamation of appreciation for the hard work and dedication of City
Staff during the September 21, 2005 storm.
Mounds View City Council September 26, 2005
Regular Meeting Page 4
• Mayor M ex lained that he asked Ci Administrator Ulrich to re are this roclamation. He
~' p t3' p p p
reviewed how quickly City Staff responded to the storm including Police Officers using flood
lights to check power lines, trees, and putting out safety cones. A resident had commented to
him that while most are in their basement, Staff was out in the storm to assure the resident's
safety. Mayor Many stated he was able to receive a full report the night of the storm.
Mayor Marry reviewed that the next morning Staff was getting telephone calls so he toured the
neighborhoods with City Administrator Ulrich, Police Chief Sommer and the Deputy Police
Chief. He explained the northern side neighborhoods did not have much damage but the eastern
side, south of County Road and all city south of County 10 sustained more damage. Mayor
Marty stated that he was informed yesterday morning that some residents still do not have power.
Mayor Marty stated he saw neighbors helping neighbors and it gave him a good feeling about
Mounds View. He noted there is still a lot of clean-up to do but a lot has been done, even by
school children since they did not have school. Mayor Marty thanked Staff and all who helped
their neighbors throughout the City.
Ms. Haake cautioned residents about tree removal contractors who provide a very high bid and
suggest to homeowners that the cost can be put against their homeowners insurance. She advised
of the $8,500 bid she received to remove three oak trees and one evergreen tree but was then able
• to settled on a bid of $1,000. Ms. Haake advised that tree removal costs cannot go on insurance
unless the tree hits the house.
Mayor Marty announced that storm damage cleanup will begin on September 27 and will
continue until the City has been picked up. Pickup will occur through the City one time so it is
important to assure all trees and brush are at the boulevard as soon as possible. He advised that
residents can also use a no-cost temporary brush site in New Brighton located on Old Highway 8
and reviewed the days and hours of collection. Mayor Marty stated this service is only available
to residents of Mounds View, Arden Hills, and New Brighton and residents must show their
drivers license at the time of disposal. In addition, Ramsey County has a free brush disposal site
in Arden Hills located at Hudson Avenue and New Brighton Road. He reviewed the days and
hours the site is open for collection.
Mayor Marty asked that this information be posted on the City's web site. Community
Development Director Ericson advised that it is already posted.
7. JUST AND CORRECT CLAIMS
MOTION/SECOND: Thomas/Gunn. To approve the Just and Correct Claims as Presented.
Ayes-5 Nays-0 Motion carried.
•
Mounds View City Council September 26, 2005
Regular Meeting Page 5
• 8. COUNCIL BUSINESS
A. 7:05 PM: Consideration of the SYSCO Second Addition Preliminary Plat,
the Rezoning of the Three-Acre Piece of SYSCO Outlot A, the disposition of
the Three-Acre Piece of SYSCO Outlot A to SYSCO, and the Vacation of an
Excess Easement and Excess Right-of--Way:
1. Public Hearing and Consideration of Resolution 6627 Approving the
SYSCO Second Addition Preliminary Plat
2. Public Hearing, First Reading and Introduction of Ordinance 761
Rezoning the Three-Acre Piece of SYSCO Outlot A from I-1, Light
Industrial, to PUD, Planned Unit Development
Mayor Marty opened the Public Hearings at 7:28 p.m.
Community Development Director Ericson stated that he will present the Staff report for both
SYSCO public hearings. He advised that SYSCO Minnesota. has submitted an application for a
major subdivision of their land located at 2400 County Road J and the City-owned land between
SYSCO and the golf course. The subdivision is a replat of the original SYSCO plat, approved in
1989. The replat takes three acres from SYSCO Outlot A .and combines it with SYSCO Lot 1,
Block 2. Currently, the developed SYSCO parcel is 24.2 acres while the undeveloped Outlot A
• is 45.8 acres. After the subdivision, the SYSCO site would be 27.2 acres and the undeveloped
outlot reduced to 42.9 acres.
Director Ericson explained that in addition to consideration of the preliminary plat, the area to be
transferred will need to be rezoned to be consistent with the SYSCO site and ordinances
approved relating to the transfer.
Director Ericson reviewed the road alignment and right-of--way that was not vacated in 1989, but
utilities are present. Ramsey County was asked if they want to retain it but if not, then Staff
recommends it be returned as one larger lot. The SYSCO lot is zoned Planned Unit
Development (PUD) and the proposed subdivision would be consistent with the existing zoning
of the property. The three acre piece being subdivided from Outlot A is zoned I-1, Light
Industrial, which is not inconsistent with the SYSCO property. However, rather than having one
piece with dual zoning designations, Staff prefers to have all of it with the PUD zoning
designation. The Planning Commission recommended approval of that rezoning.
Director Ericson explained that with the preliminary plat, Staff looked at easements, park
dedication fees, and other aspects related to subdivision ordinance regulations. The request is
straight forward by taking three acres from Outlot A and deeding it to SYSCO to make room for
their expanded parking lot and allow for the relocation of the drive aisle. An easement needs to
be vacated with the subdivision and the relocated lot line will cross the wetland easement but that
• easement is not needed because they plan to fill approximately one-half acre of land.
Mounds View City Council September 26, 2005
Regular Meeting Page 6
• Director Ericson noted the site plan that shows the existing SYSCO building and to the east the
three acre sliver of land that would be taken from Outlot A and added to the developed parcel of
SYSCO, as SYSCO Second Addition, Lot 1, Block 1. He explained that with the subdivision of
land, Staff looked at park dedication fees. Given that SYSCO deeded the 46 acres of land to the
City and paid a park dedication fee in 1989, it had been previous Council consensus to not
require another park dedication fee.
Director Ericson reviewed again the easement to be vacated and action requested by the Council
which includes land disposition from Mounds View back to SYSCO. The City Charter requires
that to be done by ordinance.
Director Ericson explained that Agenda Item 8.A.5. relates to Metropolitan Council and their
review of the Comprehensive Plan amendment which the Planning Commission recommended
and Council adopted. The Metropolitan Council felt it was somewhat inconsistent because the
AUAR did not anticipate any impact to the wetlands. The Metropolitan Council is requiring that
the City authorize an amendment to the Bridges Office Development AUAR to reflect the fact
that there will be impacts to wetlands on the SYSCO Outlot A parcel. The Planning
Commission adopted a resolution that addressed the fact that the AUAR would need to be
amended to show there would be a one-half acre of wetland impact on the SYSCO property. The
mitigation would be accomplished consistent with the standards of the Rice Creek Watershed
District.
• Director Ericson noted this project has been heard at several previous meetings and the Planning
Commission adopted a resolution recommending approval of all actions being considered by the
Council. He summarized the resolutions and ordinances before the Council at the meeting this
evening and offered to answer questions. He also noted that representatives of SYSCO are in the
audience.
Mayor Marty asked the audience if anyone wished to address this issue.
Hearing none, Mayor Marty closed the Public Hearings at 7:36 p.m.
Councilmember Flaherty asked about the cost to amend the AUAR and if SYSCO will cover
those costs. Director Ericson stated there is probably a cost and SYSCO would be responsible
for that cost.
Councilmember Flaherty stated the City is grateful that SYSCO dedicated the land to the City.
However, in the future, he would like it stricken so that issue does not keep coming up before the
City. He explained that by doing so it makes the Council feel obligated to deed it back. He
stated in future negotiations he does not want the dedication issue raised again.
Mayor Marty stated that while he understands the issue, it was SYSCO's land.
• Councilmember Flaherty stated he understands that but SYSCO deeded the land to the City.
Mounds View City Council September 26, 2005
Regular Meeting Page 7
Councilmember Stigney stated his agreement with Councilmember Flaherty's point.. He asked
how much increment .will be generated by the driveway and parking lot and how long it will take
to pay back the TIF.
Director Ericson stated he is not prepared to answer that question.
Councilmember Stigney asked if this increment for the driveway and parking lot will provide a
payback period within two years. Director Ericson stated it will probably not for the three acres
of land.
Councilmember Stigney stated they are asking fora $250,000 donation. that will not be paid
back. He stated he has a problem with that and is also concerned about cutting down 70-some
mature trees to put in a driveway. Fox those reasons and because 50 more semitrailers will be
using County Road J, he thinks SYSCO should do this project on their own "dime." He stated he
does not support this request for those reasons, and probably other reasons as well.
Mayor Marty stated SYSCO has been a good neighbor and business in Mounds View since their
inception. He agreed that the parking lot won't pay the City back, but SYSCO will pay the City
back within two years. By expanding this parking lot, SYSCO will add 100 new jobs that they
need and they are jobs that citizens of Mounds View can apply for and get. Mayor Marty stated
there are quite a few SYSCO employees living in Mounds View. He stated to help a Mounds
• View business grow, he sees as a "plus" for Mounds View. He noted that right now they are
limited in space so SYSCO has to jockey around the trucks. With the new parking lot area, the
trucks will not have to be restarted and moved around. The trucks can come in, be unloaded, and
then leave.
Duane McCarty, 8060 Long Lake Road, asked if they will be 100 new jobs and not imported
from another city. Mayor Marty stated that is his understanding.
Councilmember Stigney pointed out that if the City was not allowing this TIF money to go to
SYSCO, the TIF District could be closed next year and the TIF money come into the general
fund for another purpose. If this is approved, the TIF will go to SYSCO instead of the City,
which is another reason he does not support it.
Ed Benson, 5108 Long Lake Road, suggested that if the City doesn't give this to SYSCO then it
can go to Medtronic, a $10 billion company.
Mayor Marty stated this $250,000 to SYSCO creates 100 jobs and will be paid back in two years.
MOTION/SECOND: Thomas/Flaherty. To waive the reading and adopt Resolution 6627
Approving the SYSCO Second Addition Preliminary Plat.
Ayes-4 Nay-1 (Stigney) Motion carried.
•
Mounds View City Council September 26, 2005
Regular Meeting Page 8
• MOTION/SECOND: Flaherty/Many. To approve First Reading and Introduction of Ordinance
761 Rezoning the Three-Acre Piece of SYSCO Outlot A from I-1, Light Industrial, to PUD,
Planned Unit Development.
Ayes-4
3. First Reading an Introduction of Ordinance 762, an Ordinance
Authorizing the Disposition of Real Property to SYSCO Minnesota
Ayes-4
MOTION/SECOND: Gunn/Thomas. To approve First Reading an Introduction of Ordinance
762, an Ordinance Authorizing the Disposition of Real Property to SYSCO Minnesota.
Nay-1 (Stigney) Motion carried.
Nay-1 (Stigney) Motion carried.
4. First Reading and Introduction of Ordinance 763, an Ordinance
Authorizing the Vacation of an Excess Drainage and Utility Easement
and Excess Right-of--Way Associated with the SYSCO Second
Addition Plat
MOTION/SECOND: Flaherty/Gunn. To approve First Reading and Introduction of Ordinance
763, an Ordinance Authorizing the Vacation of an Excess Drainage and Utility Easement and
Excess Right-of--Way Associated with the SYSCO Second Addition Plat.
Ayes-4
Nay-1 (Stigney) Motion carried.
5. Resolution 6645 Authorizing an Amendment to the Bridges Office
Development AUAR
MOTION/SECOND: Thomas/Marty. To waive the reading and adopt Resolution 6645
Authorizing an Amendment to the Bridges Office Development AUAR.
Ayes-4
Nay-1 (Stigney) Motion carried.
B. Continued Public Hearing from August 22, 2005 for Resolution .6600 A
Transfer of Ownership of an On-Sale Intoxicating Liquor License for Jake's
Sports Cafe located at 2400 Highway 10. Transfer of Ownership is from
Mounds View Jake's Inc., to Thomas Stuart
Administrative Assistant Crane stated that a Public Hearing was opened on August 22, 2005 for
public comment for this transfer of license. No public comment was made. Thomas Stuart has
submitted the City liquor license application materials (to include the application to stay open
until 2 a.m. per Ordinance 717), and the applicable fees.
Administrative Assistant Crane advised that the report from the Minnesota Department of
Criminal Apprehension for Thomas Stuart came back as satisfactory. Jake's Sports Cafe has
Mounds View City Council September 26, 2005
Regular Meeting Page 9
• paid in full the utility billing and the City's Fire Marshal has inspected the location currently
called Jake's Sports Cafe and issued a satisfactory report.
Administrative Assistant Crane noted that Thomas Stuart still needs to submit a Certificate of
Insurance for his liquor license. She advised that she informed Mr. Stuart that this Certificate is
needed before the City can forward his application to the Minnesota Department of Public
Safety. City Administrator Crane stated Staff recommends that the City Council approve City
Tavern's On Sale Intoxicating Liquor License pending receipt of their Certificate of Insurance.
Councilmember Flaherty noted they are requesting to remain open until 2 a.m. and asked if that
is also in effect for other establishments. Administrative Assistant Crane answered in the
affirmative, noting Roberts and the Mermaid are both open until 2 a.m.
MOTION/SECOND: Gunn/Thomas. To waive the reading and adopt 6600 A Transfer of
Ownership of an On-Sale Intoxicating Liquor License for Jake's Sports Cafe located at 2400
Highway 10. Transfer of Ownership is from Mounds View Jake's Inc., to Thomas Stuart.
Ayes-5 Nays-0 Motion carried.
C. Consideration of Resolution 6637 Approving Bid Package One for Fire
Station Number 5 Site Work
• Fire Chief Zikmund introduced Mark Halveson, Project Executive, and Pat Sims, Project
Manager.
Mr. Halveson stated bids for Package One were opened on September 22, 2005 and there are five
contracts to be awarded. Staff interviewed all apparent low bidders and all are Minnesota
contractors, two of which are local firms. Mr. Halveson stated he is happy to report that the bids
are within one-half of one percent of the budget at this point.
Mr. Halveson advised they expect Bid Pack Two for the building package and remaining
elements to be issued mid-October for bids on that packet, which will be due mid-November.
Mr. Halveson presented the apparent low bidders for the five contracts as follows: Northland
Contractor for .the earthwork; Nobel Nursery for the landscaping; Midwest Asphalt for the
asphalt and site concrete; Northland Concrete for the footings and foundations; and Moline
Concrete for the pre-cast concrete. Mr. Halveson reviewed the bid recap summary.
Finance Director Beer asked about the large discrepancy of $100,000 between the bid from
Northwest Asphalt and the engineer's estimate for the earthwork. Mr. Halveson explained that
Alternate 3 is a significant soil correction item that was not included in the original engineer's
estimate but was included in the addendum after the budget was set.
• MOTION/SECOND: Flaherty/Marty. To waive the reading and adopt Resolution 6637
Approving Bid Package One for Fire Station Number 5 Site Work.
Mounds View City Council September 26, 2005
Regular Meeting Page 10
• A es-5 Na s-0 Motion carried.
Y Y
Fire Chief Zikmund thanked the Council for this action and advised that this matter will go to the
Spring Lake Park Council next week and Blaine City Council on October 6. He invited all to
attend the ceremonial ground breaking on October 11 at 5 p.m.
Fire Chief Zikmund reported that the Blaine City Council did approve the bid for the purchase of
two fire engines and awarded the contract to General Safety Equipment. Staff will probably take
both engines since they will include some additional features if both are ordered.
On the EMAC request, Fire Chief Zikmund advised that staff continues to be in stand down
mode and no further action has been requested.
Mayor Marty asked the Fire Chief to pass on the City's appreciation to the Fire Department for
their work after the storm.
Fire Chief Zikmund reported the Fire Department had responded to 70 calls during that 14 hour
period or 15% of their total volume. The only serious call was a structure collapse but the state
patrol officer who lived in that area had already rescued the lady.
D. Consideration of Resolution 6636, a Resolution Approving a Minor
• Subdivision of 7851 Spring Lake Road
Community Development Director Ericson explained that Donald Olson has requested approval
to subdivide his lot located at 7851 Spring Lake Road. As proposed, the subdivision would split
off the rear 255 feet of 7851 Spring Lake Road, creating aland-locked lot. Mr. Olson resides at
2933 Oakwood Drive, directly south of the proposed new lot, and would like the new lot added
to his Oakwood Drive parcel to provide more backyard space.
Director Ericson noted the proposed subdivision is in the form of a Registered Land Survey. In
this case, there are four tracts of land created by the subdivision. Tract A runs the length of 7851
Spring Lake Road and ranges in width from 7 feet to 16 feet. It would be deeded to the owner to
the north at 7865 Spring Lake Road. That will correct a 16 foot discrepancy between the plated
lines of the subdivision and where the monuments are located. Tract B is an eight foot wide strip
along the front of 7851 Spring Lake Road. This would be deeded to the City as Spring Lake
Road right-of--way. Tract C is the improved remainder of that lot while Tract D would be the
back of the lot, to be added to 2933 Oakwood Drive where Mr. Olson has his home.
Director Ericson advised this property was reviewed by the Planning Commission and it found
the remaining lot satisfies all regulations. Tract D would satisfy all requirements if fronting
right-of--way but it does not front full right-of--way so the City is requesting a deed restriction be
added that would indicate "Tract D does not constitute an independent buildable lot and shall not
• be developed for any purpose other than typical accessory uses implied or expressly permitted by
the Mounds View Zoning Code." He advised that the City Attorney's office has reviewed this
Mounds View City Council. September 26, 2005
Regular Meeting Page 11
• language and found no issues with the subdivision. The Public Works Department suggested the
lot line of Tract C and D be lined up with the property to the south but the survey monuments
have already been set and the mylars for the registered land survey produced so Staff
recommends the City accept it as submitted. He advised that Mr. Olson has consented to
easements and park dedication is not applicable since no new lots are being created. Director
Ericson explained that a public hearing was not required but Staff did notify adjacent property
owners and no comments were received. Staff and the Planning Commission recommend
approval and Mr. Olson is in the audience to answer questions, if any.
Mayor Marty asked about the restriction recommended for Tract D (that it is not buildable) and
how enforceable it would be since it would qualify as an independent lot. Director Ericson stated
that is correct and is why it is important to include that restriction since it does not front on a full
right-of--way. He stated his understanding that deed restrictions are difficult to get rid of and at
some point, if Knollwood Drive is improved and goes through, then the property owner at that
time can request the City to remove that deed restriction. Until that time, the restriction assures
that the property cannot be built upon except for typical accessory uses.
Mr. Olson stated he has nothing to add and asked the Council to approve the request.
MOTION/SECOND: Thomas/Stigney. To waive the reading and adopt Resolution 6636, a
Resolution Approving a Minor Subdivision of 7851 Spring Lake Road.
• Ayes-5 Nays-0 Motion carried.
E. Resolution 6601 Awarding a Construction Contract for the Emergency
Vehicle Preemption (EVP) Installation Project
Public Works Director Lee stated the City received and opened six bids on September 20, 2005
for the construction contract for the Emergency Vehicle Preemption (EVP) Installation Project.
The low bid was from Eagan Companies, Inc. at $59,500. The engineer's estimate was $60,000.
He reviewed that Staff did receive quotes about a month ago but they were rejected since the
dollar amount was in excess of $50,000 and the City Attorney recommended competitive bids be
received. Public Works Director Lee recommended the Council adopt the resolution awarding a
construction contract to Eagan Companies, Inc. and entering into a maintenance contract with
Ramey County for the EVP systems.
Councilmember Flaherty commented on the language of the County's contract that indicates all
the costs are to the City of Mounds View and that the City is always liable. He noted he found
no dollar figure reflected. Public Works Director Lee explained that the devices would be
owned, operated, and .maintained by the City which is why the Ramsey County contract reflects
that the City. is responsible for the cost and liability.
Councilmember Flaherty asked if the Ramsey County vehicles would be tied into this system.
Public Works Director Lee answered in the affirmative.
•
Mounds View City Council September 26, 2005
Regular Meeting Page 12
• Councilmember Thomas asked if there is an idea of the yearly maintenance costs. Public Works
Director Lee estimated it will be virtually zero maintenance except for minor maintenance once
in a while. He stated the systems are rugged and reliable so there is very little maintenance until
replacement in 25-30 years.
Mayor Marty stated he also reviewed the County contract and asked if the City already pays for
the signal system power. Public Works Director Lee stated that is correct.
Mayor Marry stated if the lights were changed to LED, the power would be reduced. Public
Works Director Lee stated the City is already in the process of switching the lights to LED.
Mayor Marty noted the contract indicates that only vehicles responding to an emergency as
defined in Minnesota Statutes can operate the system. He asked the Police Chief if they can be
set off by law enforcement personnel while in pursuit to alleviate a possible accident. Police
Chief Sommer answered in the affirmative.
Mayor Marty noted the contract indicates Ramsey County will receive a report each time the
system is used and asked if the City can also get a report. Public Works Director Lee stated the
City will not get a report unless that is requested.
Mayor Marty noted if the County deems the system is being misused, then they can turn it off.
He stated he would like the City to also get the report so they are aware of how often the system
• is being used. Public Works Director Lee stated he can make that request and noted the reports
are probably periodically monitored by Ramsey County.
Mayor Marty stated he is happy the cost came down a little. Public Works Director Lee stated
the cost came down enough to cover the City's cost to advertise for bids.
MOTION/SECOND: Gunn/Stigney. To waive the reading and adopt Resolution 6601 Awarding
a Construction Contract for the Emergency Vehicle Preemption (EVP) Installation Project.
Ayes-5 Nays-0 Motion carried.
F. Resolution 6623 Approving the Renewal of the 2005-2006 School Resource
Officer Agreement Between the Cities of Mounds View and New Brighton
and ISD #621
Police Chief Sommer stated this contract is up for renewal for the 2005-2006 school year. He
reviewed that last year there was discussion about this and the amount to contribute for this
position was reduced in order to fund a third sergeant police position in the Mounds View Police
Department. The amount was reduced from roughly $12,500 to $7,400, which is paid by
Mounds View to New Brighton to fund the School Resource Officer. Police Chief Sommer
advised that New Brighton is committed to have this officer in place regardless of the funding
• and it has .already been approved by the school district. He stated that New Brighton would
probably like the funding increased if Mounds View would like to do so.
Mounds View City Council September 26, 2005
Regular Meeting Page 13
• Mayor Marty stated we reviewed that about a year ago when another sergeant was discussed,
Staff had indicated New Brighton Director of Public Safety Bob Jacobson was surprised that
Mounds View was paying anything.
City Administrator Ulrich explained the portion of cost is divided by the students from Mounds
View and New Brighton. The New Brighton City Manager did request that Mounds View pay its
proportional share of the officer and is requesting $5,100 more than the amount presented
tonight. If the Council approves paying the original amount, he would recommend tabling so
Staff can identify an additional $5,100 in funding. Last year it was discussed and cleared with
New Brighton to put those costs towards Supervisory Staff of the Police Department.
Mayor Marty stated it was also mentioned that New Brighton didn't really see the need for
Mounds View ~ to pay so funding was reduced to provide funding for a third sergeant. Now it
appears they have changed their minds.
City Administrator Ulrich stated it was not their Council's direction but the City Manager who is
making the request, probably in their budget considerations and 12.5% increase in levy.
MOTION/SECOND: Stigney/Flaherty. To waive the reading and adopt Resolution 6623
Approving the Renewal of the 2005-2006 School Resource Officer Agreement Between the
• Cities of Mounds View and New Brighton and ISD #621 with $7,400 as annual contribution.
Councilmember Thomas asked if the City has done a calculation of the number of Mounds View
students. Police Chief Sommer stated it is a rough number but close to what it would be. Last
year it was $12,500 and this year there would be a 3-4% increase.
City Administrator Ulrich noted the Mounds View City Council will be going to New Brighton
for the next six months to use their City Hall free of charge.
Councilmember Stigney suggested there should be "no strings attached" to hold meetings at the
New Brighton City Hall.
Mayor Marty stated that New Brighton has been a good neighbor to Mounds View and many
departments work together, including Public Works. He stated he would support this motion and
then hold additional discussion at the next Council Work Session.
Councilmember Thomas stated this is a contract so approving it now and then trying to change it
later may be difficult to accomplish. She noted it could be tabled for two weeks to find
additional funding.
Mayor Marty asked if there is a deadline for the contract. Police Chief Sommer stated the school
year has started and payment is typically made at the end of the year.
• Mayor Marty noted there is time to table this consideration for two weeks.
Mounds View City Council September 26, 2005
Regular Meeting Page 14
• SUBSTITUTE MOTION/SECOND: Thomas/Many. To postpone consideration of Resolution
6623 Approving the Renewal of the 2005-2006 School Resource Officer Agreement Between the
Cities of Mounds View and New Brighton and ISD #621 to the next Council meeting.
Mayor Marty asked if Staff will be able to prepare budget information within two weeks. City
Administrator Ulrich answered in the affirmative.
Councilmember Stigney stated his support to keep funding at the current level.
Councilmember Thomas noted that is still an option.
Councilmember Stigney stated he is not interested in a two week postponement, but to approve it
at the current level tonight.
Substitute Motion to Postpone:
Ayes-3 Nays-2 (Flaherty, Stigney) Motion carried.
Mayor Marty asked if the Council could meet the shared Irondale Officer while the Mounds
View Council is meeting at the New Brighton City Hall. Police Chief Sommer stated he will
. make that request.
Mayor Marty reviewed language in the contract and asked if it should indicate that Edgewood is
a middle school since it is not an elementary school. Police Chief Sommer stated the City has an
independent. consideration for Edgewood School so it is not included in this contract.
G. Resolution 6638 Authorizing Assistant to the City Administrator Job
description and appointing that position to Desaree Crane
City Administrator Ulrich stated it is recommended this resolution be adopted which authorizes
the Assistant to the. City Administrator position and appointing that position to Desaree Crane.
He reviewed the job responsibilities that Ms. Crane has assumed, many being the duties of the
Assistant City Administrator with the vacancy of that position at the end of 2002. Since that
time, Ms. Crane has received compensation at a rate of ten percent (10%) above her level and
continued to do the duties.
City Administrator Ulrich advised that Labor Relations has performed an assessment of the
Assistant to the City Administrator position in terms of number of points relative to other jobs in
the City. They also looked at comparable pay scales to other similar jobs throughout the
metropolitan area. He noted that Ms. Crane recently received her Bachelor's Degree and has
done a great job in this position. The proposed rate would go from $22.63 an hour to $26.93 an
hour. It would be a new position with a new title. Because the job has been performed for the
• last two years, Staff recommends action be retroactive to July 1, 2005 and pay be implemented at
Step 5 at the current job position.
Mounds View City Council September 26, 2005
Regular Meeting Page 15
Mayor Marty noted the indication that this is an exempt and non-union position, so it is a
management position. He asked if this should be salaried and not hourly. City Administrator
Ulrich clarified that it is a salaried position and exempt from overtime but broken down in the
report to show the hourly rate. Currently Ms. Crane does qualify for overtime pay.
Mayor Marty commented that Ms. Crane has done a great job and grown into the job. He stated
he does not know what the City would do if she left and he believes this is well warranted. He
advised that during his exit interview, former Finance Director Charlie Hanson stated that his
department and all departments are understaffed but if an Assistant to the City Administrator
could cover some duties from each department, all would be helped out. He noted that Ms.
Crane has been doing that all along and he saw it as an excellent suggestion by Mr. Hanson.
Councilmember Thomas asked if the old position would be phased out. City Administrator
Ulrich stated the position would be vacated and taken off the books so it would not be filled. He
noted it is not in the budget to be filled next year and if, in the future, it is to be filled, Council
can look at it at that time.
MOTION/SECOND: Marty/Flaherty. To waive the reading and adopt Resolution 6638
Authorizing Assistant to the City Administrator job description and appointing that position to
Desaree Crane.
• Councilmember Stigney stated he thinks Ms. Crane does an excellent job and he is happy to see
her go towards this position. .However, he does not support filling it using Stanton 6 to justify
the salary of a $9,000 immediate raise and another 3% raise at the beginning of the year when
someone is started at Step 5. He noted the Human Resources Committee, of which he is a
member, has been looking at alternatives to Stanton 6. He does not think the Council should deal
with Stanton 6 in .the trading of new jobs. Rather, it should be followed through on the
promotions through the steps for the existing jobs. He suggested the Human Resources
Committee be allowed to look at other options, such as property based tax rates of comparable
cities. He stated he thinks it is the wrong time to proceed with this.
SUBSTITUTE MOTION: Stigney. To Postpone consideration of Resolution 6638 Authorizing
Assistant to the City Administrator Job description and appointing that position to Desaree
Crane, until resolved by the Human Resources Committee.
Councilmember Gunn read the memorandum that indicates there is no Stanton 6 matching these
duties and that the .Human Resources Committee did review the job description and
recommended Ms. Crane be reclassified.
Councilmember Stigney stated he serves on the Human Resources Committee and did not make
that statement at all. What was asked is to go out and point existing duties at this time, not
creating a new position based on Stanton.
Mounds View City Council September 26, 2005
Regular Meeting Page 16
• City Administrator Ulrich clarified that the recommendation is not based on Stanton because this
type of position and this breadth of duties does not exist in the standard group of six cities. It is
looking at the total market and what the salary range would be across different cities for a job of
this type. He stated that Councilmember Stigney is correct that the Human Resources Committee
has made a commitment to look at the salary structure based not solely on Stanton 6 but different
combinations of cities to determine what would be the best structure for Mounds View. At this
time, this salary level is irrespective of Stanton 6 but fits within jobs performed doing similar
work at other cities regardless of the Stanton group they fall into.
Councilmember Stigney stated he does not agree with all of those statements and does not see
where overnight this job creates a $9,000 increase in salary, especially when you have not
compared against comparable cities based on tax base, which the Human Resources Committee
is working on. He noted if the action is postponed it allows time for the Human Resources
Committee to make that comparison.
SECOND: /Many for discussion purposes.
Mayor Marty stated it is not creating a new job because this job has been here for years. The new
job was created in 2000 or 2001 to change the Assistant to the City Administrator position to be
Assistant City Administrator. The position has been vacant since 2002 and Ms. Crane has been
doing the job since that time.
• City Administrator Ulrich pointed out that if talking about replacing the job vacated in 2002, that
job is yet another step above this job, or an additional $20,000 more than this recommendation.
The recommendation puts the position at a level commensurate with the job responsibilities at
this time.
Councilmember Thomas stated this position replaced the job before that one was elevated. She
suggested this is a different position even though the same title so it is creating a new job
position. Councilmember Thomas stated this is the salary rate and the question is whether it is
fair to pay Ms. Crane for what she does. That is the decision to be made, whether or not it is
creating another job.
Duane McCarty, 8060 Long Lake Road, stated the Charter requires this position and the City
Administrator is authorized to appoint that. position. He stated when the Charter was written. it
looked at staffing and a weakness was an overextending of the chief officer. This provision was
written into the Charter in 1980, that the Administrator had the authority to appoint an assistant
with the approval of the Council.
Councilmember Stigney stated his concern is not the title of the job but the enumeration being
paid whether Stanton has the position or not. He stated the position should be based on tax
capacity of comparable cities rather than proceeding at this time. Councilmember Stigney stated
that Ms. Crane is the perfect person to fill the position but that is not the issue.
•
Mounds View City Council September 26, 2005
Regular Meeting Page 17
• Councilmember Thomas stated it is a comparison to the other jobs we have in Mounds View and
this is paying an equitable amount compared to the jobs we already have here. She agreed that
Stanton 6 is not the way to do it but that would require a complete reworking of all positions not
negotiated by labor union and it is not fair to ask for a delay until that correction occurs.
Mayor Marty agreed and stated that coming up with our own plan requires looking at all
positions in the City and some may have a pay freeze until the adjustment is made, or it could go
the other direction. He stated he does not think it is justified to start that change with this one
position.
Substitute motion to postpone:
Aye-l (Stigney) Nays-4 Motion failed.
Motion to approve:
Ayes-4 Nays-0 Abstain-1 (Stigney) Motion carried.
H. Consideration of Holding a Special City Council Meeting prior to the
Transfer of Real Property Commonly known as The Bridges of Mounds
View Golf Course
• City Administrator Ulrich reviewed that there are a number of items for the Council to consider
to close the sale to Medtronic by September 30, 2005 and a special meeting would have to be
called, requiring at least a 3-day notice. He distributed a list of eight items and stated if the
meeting is to be held on Thursday, it would have to be posted this evening. He reviewed other
potential meeting dates.
City Attorney Riggs explained that these items were dealt with in a different capacity, either
through contract or as result of the contract or transaction. Staff felt the Council should consider
them again before they are finalized. He stated the items are being finalized today and tomorrow,
based on timing of deeds and leases received as well as proposed language for various
agreements for the closure of the golf course. City Attorney Riggs stated that those items are
listed as either separate resolutions or separate agreements that he, Staff, and Ehlers felt should
go before the Council so they have a good understanding of what is called for and the finalized.
items for this project.
Mayor Marty stated he was thinking about adding a ninth item and asked if the Council would
like to hold a special meeting on Thursday. He stated Medtronic's building is going higher
instead of wider and using less of the 72.2 acres. He stated the last he heard they were using 25-
30 acres.
Director Ericson indicated he cannot state the exact acreage but that sounds about right.
•
Mounds View City Council September 26, 2005
Regular Meeting Page 18
• Mayor Marty stated that Medtronic talked about the eastern part being retained as unimproved
green space and asked if there is a possibility to rezone that section as open space to ensure it will
remain open space. City Attorney Riggs stated that is a possibility but not proposed at this time.
He noted it is currently designated as an Outlot and not developable until considered by the
Council and rezoned.
Mayor Marty stated it has been rezoned. Director Ericson stated it is platted as an outlot and the
City is currently under the process of rezoning. It would not be subject to development until
replatted as a lot. Director Ericson stated Staff can open the discussion with Medtronic about
considering a different zoning for the outlot.
City Administrator Ulrich stated another option is a conservation or drainage easement to assure
conservation.
Mayor Marty stated he wanted to bring it up before the "ink is dry" so it is not too late to
preserve that area as open space.
City Attorney Riggs stated he distributed a suggested agenda after discussion with Staff. If the
City were to receive a complaint tomorrow, that should also be discussed. City Attorney Riggs
explained that such a complaint would go to the League and their assigned attorney will deal with
it.
Councilmember Flaherty stated he is out of the State on Thursday and not available for a special
meeting.
City Attorney Riggs stated it is hoped that all five Councilmembers can be present but if not the
meeting could be held on Monday.
City Administrator Ulrich noted a Council Work Session is already scheduled for Monday.
Mayor Marty suggested that the Special Council meeting start earlier, at 6:00 p.m. The Council
agreed.
Duane McCarty, 8060 Long Lake Road, asked if the agenda items will be available before the
meeting. City Attorney Riggs answered in the affirmative.
Councilmember Thomas noted the agenda may be changed and does not need to be posted until
Thursday.
Mayor Marty announced that a Special Council .meeting will be held on Monday, October 3,
2005, starting at 6 p.m.
I. Resolution 6640 Authorizing the Payroll/Utility Billing Technician Job
• Description and appointing that position to Debbie Jasper
Mounds View City Council September 26, 2005
Regular Meeting Page 19
City Administrator Ulrich advised that Payroll/Utility Technician, Debbie Jasper, has assumed
several important human resource duties since the vacancy of the Assistant City Administrator at
the end of 2002. The Payroll/Utility Billing Technician was asked to take over these duties, and
for those duties continues to be compensated an additional 5% of her base pay (Resolution 6006).
The Human Resource duties that were added to the position deal with payroll, insurance
coverages, and reporting to the State as well as safety inspections.
City Administrator Ulrich stated this is an important job and he does not see these duties
changing to another position because of their relationship to payroll. This position is budget
neutral, there is no additional compensation other than the 5% increase would remain permanent.
Mayor Marty noted Ms. Jasper has been doing this job and the action would make it official.
City Administrator Ulrich stated that is correct.
MOTION/SECOND: Thomas/Gunn. To waive the reading and adopt Resolution 6640
Authorizing the Payroll/Utility Billing Technician Job Description and appointing that position
to Debbie Jasper.
Councilmember Stigney questioned the job description and suggested reference to the golf course
be stricken since there will be no golf course. He asked about processing health, dental,
reporting new hires, and whether there is an overlap with Ms. Crane's responsibilities. City
Administrator Ulrich stated these duties relate to payroll and there is no overlap.
• A es-5 Na s-0 Motion carried.
Y Y
J. Resolution 6641 Authorizing the Transfer of Assets .from The Bridges of
Mounds View Golf Course to the Mounds View Parks and Recreation
Department
City Administrator Ulrich that this resolution authorized the transfer of golf course equipment
and items to the Park and Recreation Department as well as a list of items to be sold at the
October 20, 2005 auction. Council authorized an auctioneer and Staff is working with them to
get these items ready for auction. The actual auction will proceed with closure of the property.
City Administrator Ulrich advised that a number of items have been identified by the Parks and
Recreation Department as being necessary and desirable for the City's operation and would come
from the golf course. City Administrator Ulrich presented Exhibit A and explained it was
reviewed by Public Works and Parks and Recreation Staff and the Parks and Recreation
Commission to assure the City really needed this equipment, storage needs are addressed, as well
as maintenance costs associated with this equipment. The list was developed based on that input.
City Administrator Ulrich stated the golf manager reviewed the list of items to be auctioned and
expanded it to include Exhibit B, dated September 19, 2005. He advised of the last minute
adjustments that were made and provided to the Council tonight. City Administrator Ulrich
• noted that Medtronic has not requested the ability to purchase the irrigation system and pond
aerator and that can be considered on the October 3, 2005 agenda. If pulled out, the City would
Mounds View City Council September 26, 2005
Regular Meeting Page 20
• get only a fraction of the value compared to if it remains in place. Staff will present that
recommendation to the Council for consideration.
City Administrator Ulrich stated three items would be reserved with a minimum bid price: the
Jacobson Greens Mower, the Toro Sprayer Fertilizer, and Bobcat Skid Loader. Those three
items have a substantial value while others on the list are fully or near fully depreciated. The
Skid Loader is only one year old and the minimum bid would be $22,000. He noted there has
been interest in purchasing the green turf from another golf course and private parties may also
be interested. Sand trap sand may also be of interest for purchase. City Administrator Ulrich
explained that turf and sand would be .sold in lots as is and buyers given ten days to pick it up.
The buildings would be sold on site and with the City Hall being remodeled to include some of
the excess equipment and furniture in the auction.
Mayor Marty asked about the Toro Sprayer.
Golf Course Golf Course Manager Burg stated she sent an e-mail to Mr. Ulrich today that
included the value of the sprayer. It is now being recommended that the sprayer be transferred to
the Parks and Recreation Department. She explained that golf course staff used to do the
spraying in the City. The unit was purchased at $7,500 as a demo equipment and used for two
seasons.
• Mayor Marty stated the Number 9 green sod was partially replaced and cost about $20,000. He
stated he talked with Dave Parker who indicated the irrigation system, heads, timers, and clocks,
installed, cost $250,000 to $500,000. He asked if the difference can be split with Medtronic so
the City gets at least $125,000 for it. He noted that would be more than if the system were
removed and sold.
Golf Course Manager Burg stated the irrigation system is definitely more valuable if sold
installed. She advised that calls have been received for the parts, noting the heads cost $100 each
and there are probably 10 heads per hole.
Mayor Marty stated if all the heads were transferred to the Public Works for use in City parks, it
would probably be worth about $7,000 to buy them used. If buying new heads, it would cost the
City about $25,000.
City Administrator Ulrich stated Medtronic is interested in the irrigation system so Staff will try
to work out something.
Golf Course Manager Burg noted that installation is worth about one-half of the cost.
Mr. McCarty stated he knows some people in the golf course business and asked if it is possible
to set a minimum bid on the irrigation system, in particular the pump. He suggested the system
be put up for the auction both with them taking it out or the buyer taking it out. Mr. McCarty
• noted that two come-alongs will be transferred to the Parks and Recreation Department at $10
each, which is not enough. He stated he would offer $50 for them.
Mounds View City .Council September 26, 2005
Regular Meeting Page 21
• City Administrator Ulrich asked Finance Director Beer to address the transfer issue.
Finance Director Beer explained that no money is transferred between funds, it would be only a
paper transfer since the City already owns the equipment.
Ken Glidden, 5240 Edgewood Drive, stated there are two items in discussion valued at $125,000
in one case, and roughly $180,000 in the other. Both items were raised by concerned citizens
before this Council; the sale of the greens and irrigation system, both were brought up in
meetings at the Council.
Mr. Glidden stated this resolution establishes a date for the transfer of assets if sold. He asked
the Council to consider the other proceedings heard at the meeting tonight. He asked again if the
resolution establishes a date for the transfer.
Mayor Marty stated the identified items will be sold at public auction on October 20, 2005.
Mr. Glidden stated the Council heard some things this evening and should consider what that
date should be. He stated it seems premature to him.
Councilmember Stigney asked about the number of portable telephones. Golf Course Manager
• Burg stated the portable telephone is a landline phone and was on the fixed asset list. The other
telephones are less in value than would be on a fixed asset list.
Councilmember Stigney asked if the Nextel telephones would be auctioned. Golf Course
Manager Burg stated they would be turned back and the contracts expired.
Councilmember Stigney asked if there is more than one picnic table and benches on the golf
course.
Golf Course Manager Burg stated Mr. Jahnke wants one picnic table but a lot of them are being
moved to the Parks and Recreation Department.
Councilmember Stigney noted that the Parks and Recreation Department is taking three tables
and one is being auctioned. He asked if there are only four tables. Golf Course Manager Burg
stated she was told to put items on the list that were over $100 in value.
City Administrator Ulrich stated that is correct and other items of lesser value will be included in
the auction, possibly in lots.
Councilmember Stigney noted the reference to one cable dish. Golf Course Manager Burg stated
they do not have cable service but have satellite so it would be the dish and converter.
• Councilmember Stigney noted 14 golf carts are listed and asked how the rest would be disposed
of.
Mounds View City Council September 26, 2005
Regular Meeting Page 22
• Mayor Marty asked if everything at the golf course was inventoried. Public Works Director Lee
stated an inventory list was not created but the items of value were listed.
Councilmember Stigney asked if all the items should not be included in the list for the
auctioneer. He asked if all items at the golf course will be auctioned that are not being
transferred to another department. City Administrator Ulrich answered in the affirmative.
Councilmember Thomas stated Council also asked about the irrigation system and Golf Course
Manager Burg had indicated the City will get more if it can be negotiated for sale by leaving it in
the ground.
Mr. McGarry stated his question was how it would be appraised, in the ground or out of the
ground. At an auction, it is an open bidding process and you can do well if people are willing to
remove the system, or they bid based on the City doing the removal and piling it in a trailer. Mr.
McCarty stated the City can set a minimum bid but maybe you can get more on an open auction
and let someone take out the system. Mr. McCarty stated he did not think it was very
competitive to let Medtronic have it for $125,000. He stated they are very expensive to install
and there may be people willing to bid higher. He commented that "nothing ventured, nothing
gained."
Councilmember. Thomas stated the irrigation system has been discussed several times and anyone
i bidding on it would then have to pay for installation. She stated even in the bid process. she does
not think anyone would bid $125,000 for the pieces because they then have to pay for
installation. She stated she is comfortable with negotiating the sale leaving the system in place.
City Administrator Ulrich stated he asked Golf Course Staff to give an estimate of the system if it
was not installed. That estimate can be compared to what Medtronic would pay for a system that
is in place and operational.
City Attorney Riggs stated the Council is talking about selling the system as a fixture, pulling it
out and auctioning it, or if it is over $50,000 having to competitively bid it on the sale. He asked
the Council to keep in mind that if it is valued over $50,000, the City will have to get competitive
bids and cannot auction it.
Councilmember Flaherty asked who installed the system and suggested they be asked for a bid on
how much it is worth in the ground, or if removed and sold.
Councilmember Stigney stated the metal Quonset building is a similar issue. It is pieced together
and he suggests that rather than auctioning it off, to contact the distributor and see if they are
interested in purchasing it. He noted the distributor would have a market for interested buyers.
Golf Course Manager Burg stated the building was purchased and installed by Staff. When it
• needed a new door, Staff found out that the building was no longer being made. She stated the
building comes apart with bolts and can be erected on another site.
Mounds View City Council September. 26, 2005
Regular Meeting Page 23
• City Administrator Ulrich stated that staff will contact those distributors and determine a cost.
He stated Staff will also amend the list to show the Toro Sprayer is being transferred to the Parks
and Recreation Department.
Mayor Marty noted another Toro Cart with Sprayer is listed. Golf Course Manager Burg
explained there are two sprayers but one cannot be sold because it is worn out and replacement
parts are no longer available for the sprayer. However, the cart could be sold as a workcart.
MOTION/SECOND: Thomas/Stigney. To waive the reading and adopt Resolution 6641
Authorizing the Transfer of Assets from The Bridges of Mounds View Golf Course to the
Mounds View Parks and Recreation Department with revisions as discussed.
Ayes-4 Nay-1 (Marty) Motion carried.
K. Assess Acquisition Opportunities Associated with Harstad's Red Oak Estates
#3 Townhome Project
Community Development Director Ericson stated that this item was presented at the last meeting
but not considered at that time. He explained that recently Mr. Harstad received court approval
to move forward with the project and is now going through Rice Creek Watershed District
approval. There was discussion of making an offer to Mr. Harstad for all or some of the lots in
• Red Oak Estates #3 so they could be offered for sale in a manner consistent with the City's
Comprehensive Plan. The current project would not be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
Director Ericson asked if the Council is interested in making such an offer. If so, he
recommended they schedule an Executive Session to discuss negotiating a price for acquisition.
If the Council does not want to consider this item, it can be removed from the agenda. He noted
that the trees are still there and no permits have been pulled so it is a good opportunity to discuss
this option.
Mayor Marty stated that at the neighborhood meeting with Mr. Harstad, one of the biggest
concerns of residents in this area was the amount of traffic to be generated on Louisa and
Clearview by all the trips from the owners at the ends of those streets on Greenwood. Everyone
has come to the realization that along County Road H2 it is in the Comprehensive Plan for higher
density housing and County Road H2 is better equipped to handle that traffic. Also, the people on
the north side of Louisa Avenue like looking at the woods but know there are major drainage
issues and a Swale was to be dug behind their and the Harstad property but it was never
completed. They would like the drainage issues taken care of to prevent flooding because their
sump pumps are running constantly.
Mayor Marty stated the rest of the neighborhood had concerns about the wetlands bordering
Long Lake Road. The biggest concern was the amount of extra traffic. He stated maybe the
• Council should look at the area along Greenwood Drive. He noted Mr. Harstad came before the
Council several years ago and talked about single-family along Greenwood Drive but, at that
Mounds View City Council September 26, 2005
Regular Meeting Page 24
• time, he was putting twin homes along County Road H2 and that was more amenable than any
other plan. Mr. Harstad wanted to tie it to Long View Estates on Silver Lake Road but the
Council felt it was two separate projects so they were dealt with separately.
Mayor Marty stated he would be amenable to discussing this and thinks the residents in this area
would also.
Councilmember Thomas stated it is talking about 33 units along Greenwood Drive. .She noted
the City will not be able to purchase per acre because Mr. Harstad would want it purchased by
unit. Mayor Marty stated there are actually 34 units.
Mayor Marty referenced the staff report indicating: "... if the City felt the interior lots (taking
access from Louisa and Clearview) would be better suited for open space, wetlands preservation
or stormwater management, perhaps grants could be obtained to assist in that preservation." He
asked what are the possibilities for grants for wetland preservation.
Director Ericson stated that from time to time grant programs are available for green corridors
that connect and staff can explore all opportunities for funding. However, it is not realistic to
think that one hundred percent of the acquisition could be covered by a grant.
Mayor Marty stated when the theater was constructed, it was counted as an overflow to handle
the drainage from the theater. He stated it seems to him that the wetland was taken into
• consideration as far as the 100-year storm excess run off. Director Ericson stated it is not his
recollection that the property was considered as overflow but the water does flow in that
direction from the theater. He noted the historical direction of water flow did not change with
the construction of the theater site and the amount of flow did not increase.
Mayor Marty asked if there is Council consensus to discuss this matter in closed cession.
Councilmember Stigney stated Mr. Harstad won his law suit and should be able to develop as
awarded.
Councilmember Flaherty stated he thinks the Council should look at it and determine whether it
would be fiscally prudent to even consider. He stated that he is willing to talk about it in closed
session, make an offer, and see what the City gets.
Mayor Marty asked if that would have to be discussed in closed session. Director Ericson
answered in the affirmative.
City Administrator Ulrich stated the City is not yet at a point to make a specific offer and maybe
the Council direction would be to direct Staff to start working with other developers to try and
bridge the gap between the cost to Mr. Harstad and end development sale. He stated it may be
possible to talk .with developers to see if there is even potential for a different type of
• development.
Mounds View City Council September 26, 2005
Regular Meeting Page 25
• Councilmember Thomas stated if the City is to put out an expense, it is in maintaining control
over the runoff and to then turn around, at some point, when it may be feasible to do single-
family. But, the Council is not going to be at that point until the development on County Road
H2 is completed. She stated to protect the wetland is the value that could be discussed at this
point as well as to have lower traffic numbers.
Councilmember Flaherty stated that is not an option unless it is looked at whether the City should
consider making an offer.
Councilmember Thomas stated her suggestion is to discuss true cost at face value without
considering a revenue after development.
Mayor Marty stated if the City starts talking to other developers about marketing, it may take too
long and the trees could be bulldozed.
Councilmember Gunn asked if they are considering all or part of the land, or one of the ponds.
She stated the Council also needs to discuss where the money would come from.
Mayor Marty stated it seems to him the cost will be too prohibitive. He noted the issues are
wetlands, traffic safety, and adhering to the Comprehensive Plan on the eastern-most section.
• Councilmember Thomas stated she thinks that 34 units will be cost prohibitive but is fine with
talking about it.
Mayor Marty asked if the Council wants to hold a 10-minute executive session tonight following
adjournment.
Councilmember Flaherty stated he does not know what the Council would even discuss.
Director Ericson stated he has consulted with Mr. Harstad who indicated he will not delay his
development while the City explores projects with other developers or conducts studies. He
advised that Mr. Harstad has indicated he is willing to consider an offer, if made, or he will move
forward.
City Attorney Riggs stated the Council needs to state on the record the definition of the property
being considered.
Councilmembers Flaherty, Gunn, and Thomas indicated a willingness to hold a 10 minute closed
session to assess the acquisition opportunities associated with Harstad's Red Oak Estates #3.
L. Resolufion 6643 Disposal of Golf Course Memorial Items
Golf Course Manager Burg explained that a family came to the golf course and asked to receive
• back a tree they planted in memory of their loved one. She stated she returned the memorial
plaque to them. The Japanese Lilac tree is next to Judicial Ditch #1 and will be within the
Mounds View City Council September 26, 2005
Regular Meeting Page 26
• building pad. She stated this tree is important to this family. Golf Course Manager Burg stated
there is also a sign on the Club House and they have requested the sign.
Golf Course Manager Burg stated several have also requested their name plate from the "Hole in
One" plaque. There are several plaques memorializing the club championship for the men and
women. Golf Course Manager Burg explained that some making the request are the children of a
deceased parent. Otherwise it will go to the City archives.
MOTION/SECOND: Gunn/Flaherty. To waive the reading and adopt Resolution 6643 Disposal
of Golf Course Memorial Items.
Councilmember Stigney asked if there is a problem with removal of the tree. City Administrator
Ulrich stated if the trees were being sold at auction it would be an issue but there is no issue if
the donator picks up the tree.
Mayor Marty stated he wondered about bringing the plaque out front on the rock to the City Hall.
Ayes-5 Nays-0 Motion carried.
Golf Course Manager Burg asked if the golf course should still be closed on Wednesday if the
sale has been delayed. She stated business is slow but people are still coming to get in their last
round of golf. She stated she and Ken Manthis will be there anyway.
• Councilmember Thomas noted a resolution was ado ted on the closin date and asked if that
p g
paperwork can be handled. City Administrator Ulrich stated if the Council wants to keep it open
for several more days, Council can adopt a resolution tonight.
Councilmember Thomas asked if it will impact wages. City Administrator Ulrich stated there
will be no impact. He noted that there has been a lot of communication with residents about
when the last date will be.
Golf Course Manager Burg stated that even today people called who were not aware of the
closing so she thinks some people will still come and she is certain that more dollars can be
made.
Mayor Marty stated Dave Parker told him that the greens grass has to be watered every three to
four days. Golf Course Manager Burg agreed that it is high maintenance and takes a lot of effort
to keep it alive, noting that during the summer months they water it twice a day. She stated that
customers will keep coming and as long as she is there she has no problem with selling another
token so the City can make more money.
City Administrator Ulrich stated he recalls the date to close was established by Council
consensus. He recommended the Council consider a motion to extend the closing date.
•
Mounds View City Council September 26, 2005
Regular Meeting Page 27
• MOTION/SECOND: Marty/Thomas. To keep the golf course open through Monday, October 3,
2005.
Ayes-5 Nays-0 Motion carried.
Mr. McCarty stated his comments about the sale of golf course items should in no way indicate
that he has changed his mind in any way about the sale of the golf course. He stated he is asking
a question as a taxpayer and stepping aside from his position as Chair of the Mounds View
Citizens Taxpayers Association because he has not discussed this with the Board of Directors,
nor does he intend to represent them. Mr. McCarty stated this law suit is going forward and the
question revolves around the validity of the Charter process regarding the sale of the property.
He indicated the Petition Committee has made it very clear that they wholeheartedly disagree
with the City's opinion thaf this is not a referendum item. That is why they are going forward
with the law suit, to decide that. Mr. McCarty stated that we do not know what the outcome will
be because of all the exchanges between the City's representative and theirs will take time.
Mr. McCarty asked, as a citizen, should the Citizens Taxpayers Association prevail, the vote be
ordered, and citizens denied the sale of that land, where does that leave us. He stated that this
Council and staff continues to plod forward having had more than ample notice that this was
their intention and Ms. Haake again provided documentation this evening laying our their
feelings on this situation. He stated the City received plenty of notice that this was happening but
continued to plod on and on knowing full well they had nothing to petition Judicial District 2
• with until they had a sufficient petition. Mr. McCarty stated all of these things will come into
play.
Mr. McCarty asked if the judge and courts decides that the election must be held and the citizens
turn down the authority to sell that property, where will that leave the City of Mounds View
should that happen. Mr. McCarty stated no one can guess the outcome but if it does turn out that
way, he would like an answer rather than the "old stonewall stares" we have become so
accustomed to.
City Attorney Riggs stated the City does not yet have a complaint to respond to. If received, it
will be turned over immediately to the League of Minnesota Cities defense and there may likely
be bonding requirements because the City has contractual obligations to fulfill at this time. He
noted case law discusses that and he is sure Mr. McCarty and the group have looked at that issue.
There are not insignificant costs coming to the City, to the developer, to the State, and to the
County at this time.
Councilmember Thomas stated you have provided ample forewarning and Council has provided
ample discussion of their thoughts as well. She stated that all of these factors and possibilities
were included in every decision she made so she will have to proceed on a day-by-day basis. She
noted this is not new information and she had the feelings and opinions in mind when she had to
make the decisions before and will respond on a day-by-day basis as needed.
•
Mounds View City Council September 26, 2005
Regular Meeting Page 28
• Mr. McCarty stated if the ability to sell the property is overturned by the voters, what can we
expect and anticipate.
Councilmember Flaherty stated he appreciates Mr. McCariy's hard work and he knows the
meeting protocol is to funnel everything through the Mayor who needs to recognize the members
to make a comment. He stated the blank stares may be in waiting for the Mayor to recognize
them for a comment. Councilmember Flaherty stated he knows he could talk with Mr. McCarty
all night long but the "shots across the bow" commenting about blank stares, are not appropriate
and beneath Mr. McCarty to even bring up.
Mr. McCarty stated Councilmember Flaherty should be addressing his comments to the Mayor.
He stated he will not in any way apologize or back off his comment about the "stonewall stares"
because this Council has not given them answers. He stated they should go back and look at the
film. Mr. McCarty stated he is asking for an answer from the Mayor as the presiding officer and
if a Councilmember wants to confer with the Mayor and give their ideas on what the answer
would be, he has all night long.
Councilmember Stigney stated he fails to see where this item has any place on the agenda at this
time and pointed out that the discussion before the Council is a resolution disposing of golf
course memorial items. Now Mr. McCarty has come up, asked questions, and changed the whole
thing. He stated that if Mr. McCarty wants to discuss this during public comments that would be
• the place to do it. Or put it on the agenda, or discuss it with the City Administrator but not take
over this Council meetings by asking a bunch of questions that have nothing to do with the
agenda.
Mayor Marty stated Mr. McCarty is raising the issue to see how the Council will respond. He
stated that is why he would not vote in support of disposal of golf course property, because we do
not know where this is going. He stated as far as "blank stares," the Council does look and
attend to citizens. Mayor Marty stated he has stood before other councils and they did not pay
attention to him and while maybe this Council does not have answers on the tip of their tongues,
if the Council is looking at you, they are aware of you.
Mr. McCarty invited the Council to review the August 22, 2005 meeting tape when he put a
paper up here in respect for the three minute gag rule.. With regard to whether or not he has the
right to ask these questions, it surprised him to no end that long tenured Councilmembers still
have not read the City Charter with respect to the citizen's right to address this Council on any
issue before the Council whether it's during the public comments and requests section or not. It
includes every item the Council deals with on the agenda that the Council shall not prevent.
citizen comments or requests on those subjects and it is not restricted only to that portion of the
agenda at the beginning of the meeting.
Mr. McCarty asked about the disposal of golf course equipment. He stated the Council has had
fair warning that the Council should be considering what will happen to him as a tax payer. He
• stated he will ask again and then give up knowing he won't get an answer again. Mr. McCarty
asked what will happen if the voters prevail and this Council, the City, is enjoined from divesting
Mounds View City Council September 26, 2005
Regular Meeting Page 29
• that property without having adhered to all Charter requirements, you can't sell it. If that
happens, where does that leave him as a taxpayer of the City of Mounds View. He asked if the
City has considered what the coming obligations may be in terms of Ramsey County, the
developer, the applicant, and the list goes on. He stated quite obviously, regardless of what over
1,100 citizens had to say who signed the petition, or he has said, or the people he has been
working with, the Council has kept plodding on oblivious of their concerns. Mr. McCarty stated
that is the Council's choice and responsibility and will have to stand for that. But, as a citizen
taxpayer, he asked if the Council has considered, or is there even a guess of how much it will
cost the City should the City loose and the residents prevail on this question before the courts.
He asked if there has been any guess at all or understanding or consideration of the risk being
taken having been fully informed and appraised of a potential suit on this issue.
Councilmember Thomas stated the Council cannot speculate on legal situations they are not yet
in. That being said, she stated she somewhat takes offense at the term "being oblivious to the
concerns of the residents" because the Council is not and every step and decision was fully
considered. She stated she does not have a number and will not speculate legal conditions that
are not before the Council. She stated that with every choice that was made the Council fully
considered the opinions of those they agreed with and those they did not agree with.
Mayor Many stated this can be debated all night and he has thought about this and a number of
different scenarios. He stated that even when the group brought in the petition, the Council
- cannot go on hypotheticals until faced with something. Once the Council is, then they will
address that.
Mr. McCarty asked if the Council has considered speculating on the obvious. Mayor Marty
.stated that until the Council is faced with a suit, that is when the Council will have to take it
seriously.
M. ITEMDELETED
N. Resolution 6646 Declaring a Local Emergency as a Result of the September
21St Storm
Mayor Marty stated he met with City Administrator Ulrich, Police Chief Sommer who is also the
Emergency Management Coordinator, and Councilmember Flaherty to sign an emergency
declaration.
Police Chief Sommer explained that a local emergency may be declared. only by the Mayor of a
municipality for the purpose of activating the City emergency operation plan and authorizing aid
and assistance. The local emergency declaration empowers the City to enter into contracts and
incur obligations necessary to combat the emergency by protecting the health and safety of
persons and property, and providing emergency assistance to those in need without compliance
with time consuming procedures and formalities prescribed by law pertaining to the performance
• of public work.
Mounds View. City Council September 26, 2005
Regular Meeting Page 30
• Police Chief Sommer explained that declaring a local emergency is necessary in order for the
City to receive financial aid, should it become available, for the cleanup. He recommended that
the City Council declare a local emergency as a result of the storm of September 21, 2005.
Mayor Marty stated a resident indicated that the City Forester had determined a tree was twisted
off which would not happen with straight line winds so it is an indicator of tornadic activity.
Mayor Marty stated he thinks there were some tornadoes that may not have touched down but did
skip over the City.
Mayor Marty stated Representative Bernardy's letter to the Governor is also included to seek
State aid for the clean up. He requested the rest of the Council's blessing on the resolution
declaring an emergency declaration.
MOTION/SECOND: Marty/Flaherty. To Waive the Reading and Adopt Resolution 6646
Declaring a Local Emergency as a Result of the September 21St Storm.
City Administrator Ulrich stated that City Forester Rick Wriskey has been very helpful to
identify the downed trees and commended him for the great job he has done for both Mounds
View and New Brighton.
Mayor Many stated he and Councilmember Flaherty walked through a neighborhood where the
• power lines were located in the back of the property lines. He advised that trees had grown
through those power lines and it was stated that during a storm when a tree falls down, whole
neighborhoods can be without power. He explained that Nextel is having a difficult time getting
their truck into these areas. Mayor Marty stated he would like to raise that issue before the
Council .and suggested areas of above ground power lines should be looked at to see if they can
be buried.
Councilmember Thomas stated he had the same conversation with that resident and asked Staff
to bring forward suggestions if there are ways to make Nextel's job easier. She cautioned about
the need to determine the City's responsibilities and Nextel's responsibilities.
Councilmember Flaherty. agreed with the benefit of discussing this in the future because there is a
lot of growth in the easement area. However, the City must first be asked by Nextel to help.
Councilmember Gunn stated she has noticed that some of the streets are starting to flood and
suggested residents check and clean out the storm drains.
Councilmember Stigney stated a resident called him and said he would like to learn from Nextel
Energy how they determine priority on which neighborhoods to first turn on electricity.
David Jahnke, 8428 Eastwood Road, .stated Nextel is responsible for the lines and laid off a lot of
employees to cut costs. His neighborhood only lost power for two hours because several years
• ago their neighborhood got together and all called in to say they would not pay their bill if they
lost power so Nextel cleaned out the trees and brush to assure they would not lose power.
Mounds View City Council September 26, 2005
Regular Meeting Page 31
• Ayes-5 Nays-0 Motion carried.
CONSIDER EXTENSION OF RULES
Mayor Marry noted it is has passed 10:00 p.m.
MOTION/SECOND: Thomas/Gunn. To extend the meeting beyond the official 10:00 p.m.
adjournment time.
Ayes-5 Nays-0 Motion carried.
9. CONSENT AGENDA
Councilmember Thomas asked to remove Item G. Mayor Marty asked to remove Item B.
A. Resolution 6612 Approving a Tobacco and a Restaurant License for City
Tavern located at 2400 Highway 10 in Mounds View.
B.
. This item was removed for a separate vote.
C. Resolution 6625 Authorizing the Purchase of 800MHz Portable Radios for
• D. the Police Department.
Resolution 6626 Designating the East side of Edgewood Drive from County
Road H to Woodale Drive a No Parking Area.
E. Establish an Executive Session of the City Council Immediately Following
the City Council Meeting to Consider Possible Acquisition of Real Estate
F. Set a Public Hearing for 7:05 PM, Monday, October 10, 2005 (at the New
Brighton City Hall) to Consider the Development Stage Plans, Preliminary
CRM Project.
Plat, Vacafion and Rezoning Associated with the Medtronic
G. T
Reselu#ieu~d2-~-and-~#ilie~ , . n~*~ ~ +~-~ Y__MATAbua r,,,,o~
~,,,,a Tz„a,~~+ .,,,a v,.,,.,,,,.+., rr.,~ r o.n, ~ ,. ~;~,..,~ vo.,,. ~nn~. This item was
removed for a separate vote.
H. Licenses for Approval
I. Set a Public Hearing for 7:10 PM, Monday, October 10, 2005 (at the New
Brighton City Hall) to Consider the Second Reading and Adoption of an
Ordinance Vacating an Easement Associated with the SYSCO Second
Addition Major Subdivision.
MOTION/SECOND: Gunn/Flaherty. To Approve the Consent Agenda Items A, C through F, H
and I, as presented.
Ayes-5 Nays-0 Motion carried.
• B. Resolution 6624 Authorizing an Expenditure from the DARE Fund to Train
a New DARE Officer
Mounds View City Council September 26, 2005
Regular Meeting Page 32
•
Mayor Marty stated this is a good idea and asked when and where is the training. Police Chief
Sommer stated there are several training sessions this fall but none are in Minnesota or close
enough to drive. He stated the location will depend on where he is able to attend.
MOTION/SECOND: Marty/Stigney. To Waive the Reading and Adopt Resolution 6624
Authorizing an Expenditure from the DARE Fund to Train a New DARE Officer.
Ayes-5 Nays-0
Motion carried.
G. Resolution 6642 Changing Public Hearing Dates for the Proposed General
Fund Budget and Property Taz Levy for Fiscal Year 2006
•
•
MOTION/SECOND: Gunn/Flaherty. To Waive the Reading and Adopt Resolution 6642
Changing Public Hearing Dates for the Proposed General Fund Budget and Property Tax Levy
for Fiscal Year 2006 to Monday, December 5, 2005, .starting at 6:00 p.m., and a continuation
meeting date of Monday, December 12, 2005.
Ayes-5 Nays-0 Motion carried.
10. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. August 22, 2005 City Council Meeting Minutes
The following corrections were requested:
Page 6, Lines 34, 41, and throughout, correct name to "Sebesta"
Page 7, Line 1, should read: "contacted Mr. Ericson on July 27, after..."
Page 7, Line 5, should read: "Attorney was received prior to the vote but the actual contract was
not received until July 29, when City Administrator..."
Page 7, Line 20, should read: "stated he was on vacation until July 29th. Mayor Many stated that
is when I requested it."
Page 13, Line 6, "...is selling for $8.65 million so the City ..."
Page 25, Line 19, should read: "...adjacent rights-of-_way."
Page 25, Line 22, should read: "...the former SYSCO land"
Page 25, Line 23, should read: "encompasses 46 acres..."
Page 25, Line 30, should read: "...TIF qualified costs."
Page 25, Line 31, should read: "...adopt Resolution 6594A..."
Page 25, Line 33, should read: "Resolution 5494B..."
Page 40, Line 5, should read: "one. City Attorney cgs answered..."
Page 40, Line 37, should read: "seats by 100% of the residents..."
MOTION/SECOND: Marty/Flaherty. To Approve the August 22, 2005 City Council meeting
minutes as corrected above.
Mounds View City Council September 26, 2005
Regular Meeting Page 33
• Ayes-5 Nays-0 Motion carried.
B. September 12, 2005 City Council Meeting Minutes
The following corrections were requested:
Page 23, Lines 39 and 41, correct the name to: "Sebesta"
Mayor Marty asked staff to check the video tape to verify his statement on Page 5, Lines 29 and
30.
MOTION/SECOND: Flaherty/Marry. To Approve the September 12, 2005 City Council
meeting minutes as corrected above.
Ayes-5 Nays-0 Motion carried.
11. REPORTS
C. Reports of Mayor and Council
Councilmember Flaherty stated residents really pitched in to help each other out after the
Wednesday night storm. He stated it did his heart good to see the community come together and
• he applauds residents for helping each other.
Councilmember Stigney stated during the last meeting the Mayor stated it was a fact that
residents were giving golf course staff a hard time and followed a beverage cart employee home.
At the meeting, he had questioned if Mayor Marty had personal knowledge and cautioned that
Mayor Marty should not be discussing it. Councilmember Stigney stated there was an
investigation and determined it was not factual, unsubstantiated, and unfounded. He cautioned
the Mayor about making such comments that are not factual.
Mayor Marry stated he talked to the golf course employees too and there was some
miscommunication.
Councilmember Stigney stated there was no substantiation and in the future he would
recommend the Mayor contact the Police Chief for documentation.
Mayor Marty commended all the citizens for their response after the storm and stated Staff went
above and beyond, as did neighbors and friends. He thanked everyone for pitching in and noted
that residents are still helping.
Mayor Marty stated that hauling of branches up to eight feet will start tomorrow. He noted the
information is on the web site and if residents don't want to wait, they can haul it to the storm
debris dump site in New Brighton.
Mounds View City Council September 26, 2005
Regular Meeting Page 34
• Councilmember Gunn cautioned residents to not create huge bonfires fires in their back yard.
Mayor Marty. agreed and noted recreational fires require a burning permit, a fire ring, and cannot
burn yard waste.
Councilmember Thomas pointed out that hauling is starting on the south side but cleaning is still
occurring in that area so she would like them to have additional time to assure they are not
missed.
Mayor Marty stated there may be a possibility of a pass through next week if they are still
working to clear the trees.
Councilmember Thomas explained that this particular neighborhood was not able to start the
cleanup right away so she would like consideration of just that one particular block and is not
suggesting another sweep of the entire City.
Mayor Marty stated he mentioned earlier that the top of a resident's tree was twisted off and that
was recognition of a tornado He asked if that would qualify the City for more assistance. City
Administrator Ulrich stated it would not because the consideration is the amount of property
damage.
Mayor Marty mentioned Ms. Haake's earlier caution for residents to be careful about checking
with their insurance companies and to shop around for a tree removal contractor.
• B. Reports of Staff
1. Announce that City Hall is temporarily moving to the Mounds View
Community Center
City Administrator Ulrich announced that the City Hall will be moving to the Community Center
for approximately six months starting Monday, October 3, 2005. He advised that the City Hall
will be closed on Friday, September 30, and the Mounds View Community Center will be closed
on Saturday, October 1, in order to allow for moving.
City Administrator Ulrich noted the City Police Department will temporarily relocate to the
Ramsey County Sheriff's Office in Arden Hills. A police report writing station will be located at
the Mounds View Community Center so officers will be there on occasion as well.
City Administrator Ulrich explained that the remodeled City Hall will be available for occupancy
by April 1, 2006. For people who wish to drop off utility bills, a drop off box will be provided
inside the community center during extended business hours only.
City Administrator Ulrich announced that beginning October 10, 2005, all Mounds View public
meetings will be held at the New Brighton City Hall. The Council Work Session of October 3,
• 2005 and Planning Commission of October 5, 2005 will be held in the Mounds View Council
Chambers. He advised that the meetings will continue to be televised.
Mounds View City Council September 26, 2005
Regular Meeting Page 35
Councilmember Stigney asked if Council will have access to the Community Center to pick up
meeting packets. City Administrator Ulrich stated there are some extended hours so mailboxes
could be considered. Director Ericson suggested Staff explore the temporary option of delivering
meeting packets.
Mayor Marty asked whether all of the telephone numbers will remain the same. City
Administrator Ulrich answered in the affirmative.
2. Update of The Bridges of Mounds View Golf Course Auction
City Administrator Ulrich stated questions were raised about the auction process at the last
meeting. He explained bidding "by choice" on like items so the winning bidder will have choice
to purchase all like golf carts for the same price as the first. Reserve bids will be used sparingly
and on two items identified as high valued items. He advised that the buildings will be sold in-
place and 90 days will be available to remove large buildings. Inspection will be allowed starting
at noon the day before and 8:00 a.m. the day of the auction.
Councilmember Stigney asked about bidding by choice and noted they can buy as many or all,
not just all. City Administrator Ulrich stated that is correct.
3. Active Living Ramsey County Meeting
• Ci Administrator Ulrich reminded the Council of the Active Livin Ramse Coun meetin
tY g Y tY g
that will be held this Thursday, September 29, 2005, at 4:30 p.m., at the New Brighton Family
Service Center. There will be some national speakers to address improving walkability
throughout the community and it is sponsored by Blue Cross Blue Shield.
4. Cable Broadcast Problems
Councilmember Thomas stated the cable broadcast has been problematic and formally requested
an official report on what is the problem and how it can be .fixed. She stated she has found it
extremely frustrating to turn on the channel and find only a black screen.
Mayor Marry asked about the process for hiring a cable replacement. City Administrator Ulrich
stated Staff is in the process of wrapping up the applications. He stated he is exploring .the
option of sharing this position with New Brighton where each City would have one-half of a
position. The Cable Commission will look at applications in early October and put forward an
offer for the position in mid-October.
Mayor Marty suggested a joint position with Mounds View, New Brighton, and Arden Hills.
City Administrator Ulrich stated he will look into that option.
LJ
Mounds View City Council September 26, 2005
Regular Meeting Page 36
• 5. Update of the NW Area Library Taskforce
Director Ericson provided an update on the Northwest Area Library Taskforce meeting of
September 15, 2005. He advised that several Mounds View, Arden Hills, and New Brighton
residents were in attendance. He indicated he had presented information on the community and
several residents asked what the City's position would be or is with regard to the Mounds View
Branch Library - to keep it open or have a more regional based library system.
Director Ericson stated he explained to everyone in attendance that the City would work with the
Library Board and Task Force. However, the Council supports the Mounds View Branch Library
and would like to see it remain in place. Another meeting is scheduled on September 28, 2005,
at the New Brighton Family Service Center at 7 p.m. He stated it would be good to have City
representation at that meeting.
6. National Association of Industrial and Office Properties Survey
Director Ericson distributed information on the survey from the National Association of
Industrial and Office Properties of metro cities. The survey asked this question: "What would it
take in local fees and processing time to develop this building." Seventy-nine cities responded
and surprisingly, for the most part, Mounds View is where other communities are with regard to
fees in building and plan review. In other areas, Mounds View is very far below what other cities
are charging. He stated this survey is enlightening and if he has time he will provide a summary
• of where Mounds View ranks when compared to the other cities.
Finance Director Beers stated he attended an MGFOA seminar on fees and their caution was the
fees are to be based on the cost of the service, not what other cities are charging.
C. Reports of City Attorney
Nothing to report.
12. Nezt Council Work Session: (Mounds View City Hall) Monday, October 3, 2005
Negt Council Meeting: (New Brighton City Hall) Monday, October 10, 2005
13. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting recessed to Executive Session to consider acquisition of property known as Red
Oak Estates #3 at 10:53 p.m.
Transcribed and recorded by:
Carla Wirth
• Timesaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.