Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - 2006/04/10• PROCEEDINGS OF THE MOUNDS VIEW CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW ~ ~~(~ RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA ~~y~,~(U~~ +~ Re 1 r Meetinl ~ g Apri110, 2006 New Brighton City Hall 803 Old Highway 8, New Brighton, MN 55112 7:03 P.M. 1. MEETING IS CALLED TO ORDER 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. ROLL CALL: Marty, Stigney, Gunn, Flaherty, and Thomas NOT PRESENT: None. 4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA • A. Monday, Apri110, 2006 City Council Agenda MOTION/SECOND: FLAHERTY/STIGNEY. To Approve the Monday, April 10, 2006 agenda as amended. Ayes - 5 Nays - 0 Motion carried. 5. PUBLIC INPUT Donald Jenkins, 7057 Pleasant View Drive, stated Gary Rudy would be speaking for him. Mr. Rudy stated there is a definite problem with Mr. Jenkins' property. He said it was flooded out severely last fall with water in the basement, and that he had indicated this would happen with the rains. He stated that the streets have not been swept or cleaned. There is not a silt fence going across the property, and this puts the City in violation because it is the local LGU. He stated the City should be out there to make sure the silt fence gets up, because there is wildlife in the back of the property and there has to be something as a deterrent because right now there is sand going into the natural park in the back. He stated this is a big fine of possibly $50,000 to $100,000, and inspectors are really coming down on the projects this year. He stated inspectors are going around and checking any buildings that have any wetlands involved. Mr. Rudy stated that a retaining wall has to be up to stop the water and keep it on Mr. Hanson's side, and drainage should be on Mr. Hanson's property instead of coming off over the retaining • wall. Mounds View City Council Apri110, 2006 Regular Meeting Page 2 • Mr.Rud stated that Mr. Jenkins had mud in his basement and it was a lar a mess. He stated Mr. Y g Jenkins does not deserve this after being a citizen of Mounds View for 40 years. He stated it is not right to have a bad neighbor. Mayor Many asked Community Development Director Ericson if the issue has been looked into. Director Ericson stated he can follow up with the presence of the silt fence at the front and back of the property and commented that he passed on the comments that the street may need to be cleaned up and may not have been cleaned up previously. Director Ericson stated that the City's Storm Water Management Technician visited the property and they both concur that the silt fencing that has been installed has been holding and functioning fine since it was put up. He stated the site will be final graded later this month and there should be sod there shortly thereafter. He stated Staff recommends to wait and see if this is not enough of an action plan to address any potential storm water management issues between the two properties. He stated Staff is not aware of any subsequent washouts or blowouts in between the two properties. He stated the Storm Water Management Technician would like to see the site final graded, sodded, and downspouts directed to the east and west of the building. Director Ericson stated that if something additional is needed, the City would respond, but the property owner, Mr. Hanson, should not have to go to the expense of putting up a retaining wall • when it may not be needed. He stated Staff recognizes this is a concern for Mr. Jenkins. He indicated Staff will respond if there are issues that need a City response. Mayor Marty asked if there has been any basement flooding since the silt fence. Mr. Rudy stated there has not been, but could not recall receiving any rain. Mr. Rudy wondered what will happen when the silt fencing washes away since there is "sugar sand" in the area. He stated it is going to be a big problem. Director Ericson stated the final grading has not been completed. Mr. Jenkins stated there is a four or five foot slant in the span often feet. Mr. Rudy stated there is a five and a half foot elevation difference from the elevation of Mr. Hanson's garage to Mr. Jenkins' house on approximately twenty feet. Mayor Marty asked when the grading is planned to be finished and when the sod will be put in. Director Ericson stated Mr. Hanson indicated the final grading will be done this month and sod will be installed once the final grading is done. Mayor Marty stated since there has not been any flooding this spring, that Mr. Jenkins should stay in touch with Director Ericson and if a correction is needed, then the issue should be brought back to the City. Mounds View City Council Apri110, 2006 Regular Meeting Page 3 . Mr. Jenkins stated that there was not as much snow this year and it cannot be viewed as a normal year. He stated the worst case scenario has to be considered. He stated he has lived there 40 years, and there has never been a problem since the house was built next door. Mr. Rudy urged the City to have the silt fence put in, knowing the consequences of wetland issues in a natural preserve. He stated the City would get a substantial fine from MPCA and is currently in violation. Mayor Marty asked Director Ericson to look into the issue. Director Ericson indicated he would. 6. SPECIAL ORDER OF BUISESS See discussion after Section 7A. 7. COUNCIL BUSINESS A. 7:05 p.m. Public Hearing to Consider a Conditional Use Permit for an Environmental Processing Facility at 4889 Old Higbway 8. Planning Associate Heller stated that the applicant, Merlin Brisbin of Star Environmental, Inc., is requesting approval of a conditional use permit to allow for an Environmental Processing Center, • which would be located at 4889 Old Highway 8. This is the site of the current Skyline Motel, which is zoned "Industrial". Planning Associate Heller stated that the Comprehensive Plan separates out light and heavy industrial uses. She stated that the proposed use by Star Environmental could be interpreted as a heavy industrial use. She indicated the majority of the site is designated as light industrial on the future use map. Planning Associate Heller stated that the applicant and representatives from Metro Council and MFRA Engineering are here. Mayor Many opened the public hearing at 7:15 p.m. Mary Brisbin, 8182 NE River Road, Elk River, stated Star Environmental is requesting approval for a conditional use permit for a proposed environmental processing center in Mounds View. She stated she and her husband, Merlin, appreciate the opportunity to present additional information. She stated that over the past six years, they have carefully researched the need and methods to remove solids from septage before it enters the main line of the Metropolitan Council. She stated the process is safe and very effective, and has the support of the Metropolitan Council. Ms. Brisbin stated that at the April 3, 2006, Mounds View City Council meeting, several • individuals expressed concerns with additional traffic and odor problems that would be coming with the facility. She stated that she and Mr. Brisbin have operated the septic business for 29 Mounds View City Council Apri110, 2006 Regular Meeting Page 4 • years. She stated she knows the importance of providing a clean and safe environment for the employees, customers and the public. She stated they are strong supporters of regular water and air testing to ensure that the system operates in a fully safe manner. She stated they support a code of conduct for the haulers so that the noise is diminished, and leaks and odors are controlled. She stated any haulers that do not meet the high standards would be fined and not allowed to return to the facility until the issues are remedied. Ms. Brisbin stated she appreciates the residents' concerns in regard to the traffic issue. She stated the traffic levels would increase by 1 percent on Old Highway 8. She stated with proper scheduling, Star Environmental will try to minimize the impact for the homeowners at Townsedge Terrace. Ms. Brisbin commented that Star Environmental is not a large company like Medtronic, but rather is a small company that is responding to the needs of the industry and of the metropolitan area. She stated Star Environmental is not going to be employing thousands of people, but it will be benefiting thousands of families that use septic systems and many more that rely on the Metropolitan Council's interceptor system. Ms. Brisbin stated the proposed site in Mounds View is ideal, because the sewer line on Old Highway 8 has adequate capacity, and is a short distance to a 21 inch interceptor line and a short distance to the Metropolitan Council's station on County Road H. Ms. Brisbin indicated that Star Environmental is not asking for TIF money or financial assistance from the City. She stated the project does not require the City to make a major investment in any sewer or water lines, and does not require the Metropolitan Council to make any infrastructure investments. She stated Star Environmental will be providing the private sector project with its own resources. Ms. Brisbin indicated it will create eight well paid jobs with a capital investment per job of over $600,000. She stated Star Environmental is investing $5 million to redevelop a blighted property. She stated they are paying a large SAC fee of $800,000. She stated Star Environmental is not seeking to buy public land; however, a purchase agreement was negotiated with Skyline Motel, which is zoned industrial. Ms. Brisbin stated that compared to other sites, this is a central location that provides good access to all major roads. She stated that Star Environmental wants to be a top notch facility that will exceed operating standards and meet all the company's goals. She stated Star Environmental wants to operate a facility to be proud of and one that the community can be proud of as well. Eric Larson, 6529 East County Road, Milaca, stated he has served as an elective representative for 15 years. He stated elected representatives have a responsibility when there is a contentious issue to sort fact from fiction. He stated the proposal has been brought to the Planning Commission, and a public informational meeting was held and every question was responded to. He stated sometimes people did not seem to want to hear the answers. He stated the Council • should gather all the information to make the proper decision based on the facts. Mounds View City Council Apri110, 2006 Regular Meeting Page 5 Matt Fulton, City Manager of New Brighton, presented a letter signed by all the members of the New Brighton City Council that recommends denying a conditional use permit to Star Envirorunental. He stated the City of New Brighton understands the applicant's intent and the benefit that their system can provide to the metropolitan waste system, in terms of capacity and flow issues. He stated as a result of their operation, it will save money for utility customers throughout the metropolitan area. He stated they are trying to preserve private business. He stated the City of New Brighton understands the merits of the company and what the Metropolitan Council are trying to accomplish. Mr. Fulton stated there are several concerns with the proposal. He stated there are concerns about potential odors that may occur at the site during normal operations and from an accidental spill at the site. He stated any odors coming out of the site would impact the immediate area, including Long Lake Regional Park, the new senior cooperative building and all surrounding residents. He stated this is a significant issue for the City of New Brighton. Mr. Fulton explained there are concerns about the traffic impact on Highway 96 and Old Highway 8. He stated that even though it is an increase of 1 percent, there are times when the intersection is very congested. He explained that any kind of additional traffic, especially hauling trucks, does have the opportunity of potential for causing a much greater impact on the transportation corridor. He stated the City of New Brighton is particularly concerned because of the new construction at the intersection of Highway 96, and particularly the independent haulers that are not employed by Star Environmental. He stated there are concerns with how well the trucks will be mamtamed and possible leakage or spillage. Mr. Fulton stated that New Brighton is currently undertaking a very large residential project of an investment of $70 million in the development of over 700 homes, 500,000 square feet of office space, and 40,000 square feet of retail space. He explained it is all in a mixed urban village interspersed with passive recreation areas. He stated anything that could get in the way of successfully marketing this large project is a big concern given the significant financial investment in the project. He stated it may be a clean industry, but there is a significant concern with truck traffic on transportation corridors and the image aspect of this type of business. Mr. Fulton stated the long term future of the Highway 10 corridor must be considered. He stated most of the design scenarios show Highway 10 connecting in to Old Highway 8 corridor and terminating at Highway 96. He stated this would mean that this parcel would be adjacent to a significant corridor. He wondered if this is the appropriate long range zoning classification for the properly, or if it might be better zoned for a commercial use of the property. Mayor Marty stated the long range plan by MnDOT is to close off Highway 10 where one would normally exit through Mounds View onto Interstate 35W and Highway 96, and also to close off County Road H and take it down to Highway 96 and make a different interchange. Councilmember Thomas asked what the current traffic projections are for the fully developed northwest quadrant. She stated the proposal by Star Environmental will have a 1 percent increase, while the large development by New Brighton will result in a significant increase in Mounds View City Council April 10, 2006 Regular Meeting Page 6 traffic. Mr. Fulton stated that a study was conducted that identifies that the intersection of Old Highway 8 and Highway 96 needs to be reconstructed and controlled through stop lights, but also stop lights need to be installed at the major intersections extending southerly. He stated the intention is to create a yield turn for all eastbound traffic as they exit the site. He indicated that New Brighton and portions of Arden Hills are at the tail end of the Highway 96 construction project and are waiting for the final project element to be completed. Mr. Fulton stated it cannot be completed until Arden Hills determines what the intersection is going to be at Highway 10 and Highway 96. He stated this all comes into play with MnDOT's long term plan because all of the intersections are related. He stated that Highway 96 is a problem regardless of this proposal. He stated from a traffic volume standpoint, this proposal will have a minor impact, but it is the type of traffic and the possibility of leakage or spills that New Brighton is mostly concerned about. Councilmember Thomas asked if the City of New Brighton had any discussion in regard to the image and safety for the current motel and what the plan is for the increased pedestrian usage. Mr. Fulton stated the City of New Brighton strongly encourages the City to redevelop the motel site, but wonders if this is the appropriate use and zoning classification for the parcel. Mayor Marty stated the City of New Brighton has significantly reduced the amount of truck . traffic due to the redevelopment of the northwest quadrant with the relocation and the closing of businesses. Mr. Fulton stated the purchase of Midwest Asphalt has made a big impact on the types of traffic. Jerry Tobermann, 9909 South Shore Drive, Plymouth, stated he developed Townsedge Terrace in 1969. He stated the City Council was reluctant to approve the development at that time, as they felt that mobile home residents were not paying the fair share of taxes. He stated there are 238 families living contiguous to the proposed project, and there are many concerned residents. He stated he received several phone calls from families that indicated they would consider selling their homes if the project was approved. He stated there is no guarantee that there will be no spillage or odors. He stated that as representative for the 238 families, they are definitely against this project going through. He stressed that no one in the room would want to live contiguous to this project. Vladimir Paraskov, 2105 Dickens Lane, Townsedge Terrace, stated there are more than 230 families living in the mobile home park. He stated it is one thing to pass through the mobile home park, and it is another thing to live there. He stated that no fine is enough to stop the business of pollution or creating problems once the facility is built. He stated there are several potential impacts such as transportation, traffic, pollution, and air quality. Mr. Paraskov stated that some mornings he has to wait ten minutes to make a right hand turn out of the mobile home park. He stated this is the smallest of the problems. He stated that this project could result in a potential health hazard. He questioned if a truck carrying sewage can be Mounds View City Council April 10, 2006 Regular Meeting Page 7 absolutely clean and not have smell and/or drips. He stated a main concern of the residents of Townsedge Terrace is what may happen to the value of their homes if this project is approved. Jim Clark, 2152 Buckingham Lane, Townsedge Terrace, stated he is very concerned over the situation as he is raising his family in Townsedge Terrace. He stressed that he is very afraid of the health risks and will vacate the area if the project is approved. He stated in reading the application for the conditional use permit and the approval, it talked about the use of pharmaceuticals and the oil refinery in the area. He commented that he did not see where the sewage end fit into that category. He stated it also indicated in the permit that the property value is of no consequence to the surrounding area, and stressed that it is a big consequence to him because he lives there. He stated property values will go down if the project is approved. He noted there have been improvements made to the mobile home park over the years. Mr. Clark questioned the possible pollution of Rice Creek. He stated the priority of Rice Creek Watershed District is that it is a natural filter of all the water in the area, and if that were to get polluted, it feeds all of the water tables in the area. He stated it does empty into the Mississippi River just above the intake ducts of Minneapolis and St. Paul. He stated if there were a spillage, it could be a catastrophe for many more people than just the residents of Mounds View. Mr. Clark asked what benefit the people of Mounds View will gain from the project. He stated he can see the benefit for Mounds View by increasing the property tax on the motel site, but there would be a decrease in property tax revenue from the people that leave the mobile home park. He indicated he pays approximately $1,400 in property tax per year and believes it is a significant amount to the City when a11230 homes are taken into consideration. Mr. Clark presented a petition signed by 170 residents of Townsedge Terrace that are against the proposal. He stated that the notification by Star Environmental only went about one block into the trailer park and only 62 homes were notified. Shirley Dougherty, 2153 Buckingham Lane, Townsedge Terrace, stated that she worked on creating the Rice Creek Watershed District 40 years ago. She stated it is different than all of the other watershed districts in the State of Minnesota. She indicated it was put in place to protect an urban creek or watershed that would feel tremendous pressure as upstream development occurred. She stressed that Rice Creek is a very environmentally sensitive area. She explained that the way Rice Creek comes in to Long Lakeis that the fresh water inlet that is across a narrow strip from the outlet. She indicated the lake does not get the normal turnover with an inlet and outlet like in a regular lake system. She stated actions have taken place to make sure the open space will protect the lake. Ms. Dougherty stated that if there was a spill directly into the Rice Creek system, it would significantly affect Long Lake. She wondered if this project got an environmental assessment or review. She stated that it is not just an environmentally sensitive area, but there is also a hazardous product involved. She also wondered if an annual review would be required. Mayor Marty stated that the report and the resolution do not state that any assessment has been Mounds View City Council Apri110, 2006 Regular Meeting Page 8 done or that it is required. Director Ericson indicated this is correct. Mr. Larson stated that this proposal will trigger a review of Rice Creek Watershed if the project moves forward. Matt Collins, 2220 Dickens Lane, Townsedge Terrace, stated he has been a resident for six years and does not want to see this facility in his backyard. He stated he has never seen a roll off container that does not leak. He stated that when the lines are dug, there will be sewage coming out of the lines that will make a mess. He stated the project is not environmentally sound. He stated he is concerned about the higher traffic level and the potential for more traffic accidents as well as potential spillage. John Holmes, 5012 Londonary Drive, Townsedge Terrace, stated he has been a resident for 25 to 30 years. He stated his understanding is that Star Environmental will use independent truck companies, and commented that he has worked with and been around several trucking companies, and no independent trucker keeps their truck up to code unless the DOT stops them and fines them. He stated the haulers are often too busy to fix their trucks. Mr. Holmes stated that the mobile home park is in "Tornado Alley", and wondered what the ramifications would be if a tornado were to go over the site. He stated that not too many of the mobile home park residents are in attendance of the meeting, but most do vote, and they will be concerned as to how the City Council votes on this issue. Richard Merlach, 2200 Kingsway Lane, Townsedge Terrace, stated this project is only laid out on paper, and there is no prototype since it is the first one of its kind. He asked what is to prevent things happening that are not on paper. He stated about 99 percent of projects on paper never turn out in reality. He asked the Council how they would feel if the project was going to be within a couple of blocks of their homes. Mayor Many closed the public hearing at 8:01 p.m. Councilmember Flaherty thanked the residents for speaking on the issue. He stated the applicant is trying to get a viable business to enhance the beauty of the area. He stated the blighted Skyline Motel is on the Council's list of issues to address. Councilmember Flaherty explained that the City judges new businesses on specific guidelines. He stated one guideline is the employment opportunities for the residents of Mounds View. He indicated this facility will employee seven to eight employees at the most. He stated this does not meet the criteria. Councilmember Flaherty stated another guideline is traffic. He stated Old Highway 8 is a very busy street, and leaving the Townsedge Terrace property can be difficult at times. He stated the current truck traffic is four trucks per hour at peak time. He stated this does not seem like much, but it is one truck every 15 minutes that is coming around the corner. Councilmember Flaherty stated he is not convinced that the opportunity for smells will never happen. He explained that he has received numerous phone calls and emails on the subject, and has not heard a positive response from the community. He stated he would vote against the Mounds View City Council April 10, 2006 Regular Meeting Page 9 project. Stacy Smith, 2257 Kingsway Lane, Townsedge Terrace, stated she was concerned with the safety of children around the area, as well as the increased traffic levels. She stated if the project was approved, no one would want to buy her home. She stated her opposition to the project. Councilmember Stigney stated that a lot of questions have been asked of the prospective business at the previous meeting, and many residents' comments were heard tonight. MOTION/SECOND: STIGNEY/MARTY. To waive the reading and deny a Conditional Use Permit for an Environmental Processing Facility at 4889 Old Highway 8. Councilmember Stigney stated that this facility will be heavy industrial rather than light industrial. He wondered why the Planning Commission did not look into this fact further, because they recommended approval of this project by stating that it is consistent with the Comp Plan. He stated there are sufficient legal reasons for denial that include the applicant is proposing to operate a heavy industrial business in a light industrial zone, the applicant did not demonstrate there would be no odors in association with the proposed use, and the applicant did not sufficiently demonstrated that leaks or spillage would or could be prevented. Councilmember Thomas wondered what kind of maintenance records MnDOT has, how often are vehicles inspected, and what follow up is done with the vehicles. Councilmember Thomas wondered if the Comp Plan would have to be changed to reflect a heavy industrial use when the Comp Plan is reviewed next year, if this project is approved. Director Ericson stated that if the request is approved, it is imperative that the Comp Plan be reviewed by the Planning Commission and City Council in terms of designation of property. He stated that a small part of the area is zoned heavy industrial and the rest is zoned light industrial. He stated that definitions of this type of use should also be reviewed in more detail, as there is not a specific and clear definition. He stated there is the greater issue of industrial uses along a residential area. He stated that regardless of what happens with this request, the City needs to look at this issue. Mr. Brisbin, Star Environmental, stated the trucks are inspected once per year by MnDOT. He stated if the trucks leak, they will incur a fine of $200. He stated no engine breaks are allowed, and the trucks would not be allowed back into the facility until they are fixed. He indicated that all haulers would receive instructional handbooks of these requirements. Mayor Marty stated that the Planning Commission voted to approve this request, but there is an addendum to the Staff report that was submitted to the Council. He stated that it was found after further review of the Comp Plan, the future land use designation for the majority of this site is light industrial. He stated the environmental processing site is considered a heavy industrial use. He stated this facility would not be consistent with the Comp Plan. He stated that this information was not presented at the time of the Planning Commission's approval. Mounds View City Council Apri110, 2006 Regular Meeting Page 10 Mayor Marty explained the definition of fight industrial use primarily includes manufacturing, processing, fabrication, assembly, packaging, incidental storage sales and distribution of predominantly previously prepared materials, finished products or parts. He stated all processing is within buildings with limited exterior storage, have limited truck traffic, and is free of noise, odor, dust, glare, smoke, and other pollutants. Mayor Marty reviewed examples of light industrial uses. Mayor Marty explained the definition of heavy industrial use primarily includes manufacturing and processing of large, bulky and predominantly raw, extracted or hazardous materials. He indicated it includes storage of flammable or explosive materials that propose a threat to public health or safety. He stated there is exterior storage of large equipment or material, and there is outside processing or assembly that generates significant traffic, and remits amounts of noise, odor, dust, glare or other pollutants. Mayor Marry reviewed examples of heavy industrial uses. Mayor Marty stated that based on this information, the request is not consistent with the current Comp Plan. He stated there would be depreciation of the residential area bordering the facility, and the proximity of the residential neighborhood should be kept in mind. He stated that the area already has high truck traffic due to the existing businesses in the industrial park, and New Brighton has made a concerted effort to develop the area and reduce truck traffic. He stated it is not a good idea to replace the amount of truck traffic that has been reduced with septage trucks. Mayor Marty stated the Metropolitan Council is behind tins project, and indicated they are closing four locations in the northern and western areas of the metropolitan area (Forest Lake, Coon Rapids, Maple Grove, Plymouth). He indicated the sites in Forest Lake and Coon Rapids are not monitored, but instead the trucks back up to manholes and make a discharge. He stated there is no indication as to the amount of trucks that use these sites because it is not monitored. Mayor Marty stated Coon Rapids wants to get rid of the site because of the number of trucks backing up to the manhole. He stated he is concerned that if all four sites close then the traffic will come to Mounds View. He referenced the March 27, 2006, Council minutes, where it was quoted that "there would be increased traffic of nine to ten vehicles per hour", but now it is quoted at four to seven vehicles per hour. Mayor Marty stated the Planning Commission examined all issues and recommended approval recognizing there are mechanisms that can be instituted with a conditional use permit for noise and odors if there is a problem. He stated that the applicants are trying to do a good service, but if $5 million is put into the project, the treatment plant may not be able to be extricated from Mounds View. He stated there could be fines assessed, but it would be too late. Mayor Marty stated that New Brighton has been a good neighbor to Mounds View. He stated he has not heard anything positive about the project from any surrounding cities. Mayor Marry stated the residents of the City of Mounds View are on City water and sewer, so no residents would benefit from a septage center, and may be more of a detriment to residents. He indicated he has yet to receive a call in favor of this proposal. Mounds View City Council April 10, 2006 Regular Meeting Page 11 • Mayor Marty stated there are sufficient means to deny this conditional use permit because rt is inconsistent with the Comp Plan. He stated in order to be in compliance with the Comp Plan, it would necessitate changing the Comp Plan to accommodate this business. He stated he cannot support this proposal. Councilmember Thomas stated she grew up in a mobile home park and feels a need to defend the residents in the area. She stated the residents of the mobile home park are concerned about the blighted motel property as well. She stated she is concerned with the Comp Plan issues. She indicated there are truck issues as there is no record of how closely MnDOT watches trucks. She stated it can be a difficult thing to keep on top o£ She stated there is a health and safety issue currently going on at the motel property right now that the City cannot stay on top of. Councilmember Thomas stated this is the first time there has been a willing seller and buyer of the property. She wondered how long it would take to find another situation with two willing parties. Councilmember Thomas indicated the City is not doing a service either way by what is at the properly now or what would come in. Councilmember Stigney stated the City is doing a great service for the people of Townsedge Terrace by not allowing the business to come in. He stated the motel is an entirely different issue, and what is being discussed is the proposed business coming in. He stated it is important to deny the request for the stated residents' concerns, and that needs to be the focus regardless of the other issues with the motel. Councilmember Gunn stated she has heard the residents' concerns and has talked to the proposed business owners. She stated she is concerned about traffic and the Comp Plan. She indicated she didn't know if the City should get into changing it right now. She stated she does not like the motel and it is a big problem for the City. She stated the Townsedge Terrace residents should also be concerned about that. She stated she has to listen to the residents' concerns and is leaning toward denying the project. City Administrator Ulrich clarified that the resolution includes recommended amendments that would revise Item 4 and add Item 5. Councilmember Stigney accepted the amendments to motion. Mayor Marty accepted as well. Mayor Marty added that people could be dumping material down septic tanks from meth labs that is highly hazardous, and in ten years from now, there may be something even worse. He stated it is a new facility but in 15 years, the pipes will be older and may start leaking, and wondered what would happen then. Mayor Marty stated that something needs to be done about the motel, but this proposed facility is not the answer. He stated he received several calls and emails, especially from the residents of Mounds View City Council Apri110, 2006 Regular Meeting Page 12 • Townsedge Terrace, in opposition to the project. Mayor Marty stated that this does indicate that the owner of the Skyline Motel may be willing to sell to another developer or another use that may come along. Mayor Many noted that Councilmember Thomas wanted to keep billboards off Old Highway 8 for the residents' sake, but then indicated it would be acceptable to put a septage treatment plant in their backyards. Councilmember Thomas indicated she made no such statement and that the Mayor's comment was incorrect. Ayes - 5 Nays - 0 Motion carried. William Werner, 2765 Sherwood Road, questioned how the process was started. Mayor Marty explained a purchase agreement was made and the buyer needed a conditional use permit for the intended use. Mayor Marty recessed the meeting at 8:33 p.m. Mayor Marty called the meeting back to order at 8:42 p.m. Mayor Marty introduced new Metropolitan Council representative Kns Sanda. Ms. Sanda stated she is the newly appointed Metropolitan Council representative for the district. She indicated she was visiting the City Councils of all the cities in the district. Ms. Sanda stated that Mounds View currently has a wonderful process, and it is a local call to make the decision on the environmental processing plant. She indicated that the number of septic tank properties are increasing in the metropolitan area, and by 2030, there is going to be about 75 more septic tank properties for residential owners in the metropolitan area. She indicated part of it is because there is construction being allowed in what were previously wetland areas, and there are new methodologies on septic systems and the type of buildings that are being constructed. She explained there are former sod farms in Blaine that are being converted into housing. She stated there is a paradigm shift in the housing being built and the type of housing people want to buy. Ms. Sander thanked the Council for the opportunity to address the City. B. Introduction and First Reading of Ordinance 771, an Ordinance Amending Chapters 502 and 503 Regarding Liquor Licenses. Community Development Director Ericson explained that the first proposed amendment changes the code to require that a public hearing be conducted for every new, transferred or renewed . license. He noted this change is recommended based on feedback from residents who would have wanted to provide input during license renewals. Mounds View City Council Apri110, 2006 Regular Meeting Page 13 • Director Ericson explained that the other proposed amendment would allow liquor license facilities to offer outdoor seating in association with their establishment. Director Ericson stated the second reading will be at the April 24, 2006, City Council meeting. Mayor Marty wondered if this Ordinance applies to liquor licenses for 3.2 percent malt liquor. Director Ericson indicated there is a separation in the code of chapters for intoxicating and non- intoxicating liquor licenses, and explained this Ordinance applies to both parts of the code. MOTION/SECOND: THOMAS/GUNN. To waive the reading and approve the Introduction and First Reading of Ordinance 771, an Ordinance Amending Chapters 502 and 503 Regarding Liquor Licenses. Ayes - 5 Nays - 0 Motion carried. C. Resolution 6782 Authorization to Hire a Communications Coordinator for the Administration. Assistant to the City Administrator Crane explained this position would be a full time exempt position, and will be a union position under the AFSCME Union Contract. Assistant to the Ci ty Admimstrator Crane noted that interviews were conducted and the top choice to fill the position is Kimberly Blackford. She explained that Ms. Blackford has a background with cable casting City Council Meetings with Brooklyn Park and the City of Crystal. She was also a Videographer with Legal Video. Councilmember Thomas stated she is concerned about the lack of website experience. She stated she understands that it is a full-time position that would have split duties. She stated that training needs to come first and foremost and hopes that other candidates that had website experience were not ignored. She stressed that website communication is very important. Assistant to the City Administrator Crane stated that is a valid concern, but the interviewing panel had to weigh in the different types of experience the applicants had. She stated that Ms. Blackford has experience in writing and cable, but lacked a bit in website design. Assistant to the Administrator Crane commented that Director Ericson indicated it would be a fast transition to provide training on the website. Councilmember Flaherty stated that clearly one of the main elements of the job is the website maintenance and design. He suggested Ms. Blackford should be enrolled in classes immediately. Councilmember Flaherty asked who the website host is. City Administrator Ulrich stated it is through the City of Roseville. Councilmember Flaherty asked if the Ci has access to than e the soft coded material on the tY g Mounds View City Council Apri110, 2006 Regular Meeting Page 14 • website. City Administrator Ulrich stated the City is looking at different web hosting site to allow a more user-friendly environment and a less labor intensive process to allow more of Staff to make updates on a regular basis. He added that it is currently very time consuming for Director Ericson to do the website work. Councilmember Flaherty stated the yearly maintenance fee for website hosts can be quite expensive. Jonathan Thomas, 8480 Groveland Road, stated he is a computer systems engineering consultant, and indicated that anything can be changed on the website. He stated the web is like a book with chapters and sub-chapters, and all of the pages are a document. He explained the language to tie it all together can be complicated and will vary with internet providers, but the City does have complete control over the entire website. Mr. Thomas stressed that this position needs to understand the issues with security, and this may not come necessarily by sending the person to classes. Councilmember Flaherty asked Mr. Thomas if there is any hard coding done by the website host to limit access. Mr. Thomas indicated all material is soft coded. He added there is tremendous competition by internet service providers that leads to a much lower price. Councilmember Gunn indicated she was not that concerned about the lack of website experience. She stated the web site is established and there is not that much to learn for the website. She suggested a class on web page design might be available through Community Education department. Councilmember Thomas stated that website design is not difficult, but the position is to manage the website and the information. She stated the City has put certain tasks off because it is waiting for the right person to come on board with the appropriate knowledge. She stated there would be further delays in the communication forum until this person receives the proper training. Mayor Marty stated this was also his concern, but due to the fact that Director Ericson was one of the interviewers and has been the only person to work on the website ever since he put it together, it gave him some confidence that this person could learn the website part of the position. He added that the employee would also be on a probationary period. Councilmember Gunn stated the City does need to allow her the opportunity to complete training and courses. MOTION/SECOND: GUNK/FLAHERTY. To waive the reading and adopt Resolution 6782 Authorization to Hire a Communications Coordinator for the Administration. Councilmember Stigney asked for the resolution to be read. He stated the position should be a • three-fourths time cable coordinator that is paid by the cable franchise fee as it has always been. He stated this full time position will result in taxpayers picking up the 25 percent additional cost Mounds View City Council Apri110, 2006 Regular Meeting Page 15 • and there would need to be full-time employee benefits paid. He stated the additional communication duties could have been assigned to an existing full-time Staff member. He stated he does not support hiring an additional person. City Administrator Ulrich read the resolution. Mayor Marty stated the three-fourths time cable coordinator position did the cable part pretty well, but the website was severely lacking. He explained that Director Ericson. updated the website in his limited spare time. He indicated that this person would also do any necessary press releases out of the City. He indicated the position includes several additional job duties and responsibilities. Councilmember Stigney stated that the additional duties should be handled by existing full-time Staff. Ayes - 4 Nays - 1 (Stigney) Motion carried. D. Introduction and First Reading of Ordinance 772, an Ordinance Amending Chapter 7 of the City Charter Relating to Taxation and Finances. Jonathan Thomas, Mounds View Charter Chairperson, stated it was recommended that Chapter 7.04, Subdivision 1, be changed so that the sentences regarding the "proposed operating budget" and the "final budget" are reversed. He indicated this was discussed in the Work Session, but was not changed on the Ordinance. Councilmember Stigney stated that in Section 7.05, he stated he has concerns with using the word "element" to describe the Five-Year Financial Plan. He stated "element" is inappropriate to redefine the names of the segments that are in the Five-Year Financial Plan. He stated they should be called "Program" or "Summary", as they have always been called. He stated the word does not have to be tied into all the titles. Councilmember Flaherty stated that the difference of the words is semantics. Councilmember Stigney stated he has a problem with renaming a program to call it an element. Councilmember Thomas asked Finance Director Beer if it changes the financial reporting from the City by using the word "element". Finance Director Beer indicates he does not foresee any problems, and the only issue may be that some people have become accustomed to the verbiage that was used previously. Councilmember Gunn stated that she agrees with the use of the word "element". Councilmember Thomas noted that there are programs within the elements. Councilmember Gunn wondered if Subdivision 5 should read "...above-described elements..." Mounds View City Council April 10, 2006 Regular Meeting Page 16 • Mr. Thomas stated this could be considered a friendl amendment. Y Mr. Thomas stated that the term "element" is a very significant issue, and the goal is to try to achieve consistent terminology throughout the City Charter. He stated the items are pieces or elements of the plan. He stated that within Chapter 7, the Commission has tried to achieve consistency throughout the whole chapter. He indicated for the process to work, there must be total and complete agreement. He noted that Councilmember Stigney did not have any suggestions on how to make the wording consistent at the Work Session. Councilmember Stigney stated he did not care how the breakdown was described, but that he was against renaming items to elements that are already defined as programs. Councilmember Thomas wondered what makes the item a program. She stated the word "program" is being used incorrectly, and the items should be referred to as an element as part of the financial plan. Councilmember Flaherty stated the term "element" is in the correct context as a portion of the entity. Councilmember Thomas stated that any amendment would result in the resolution being brought • back to the Charter Commission. Mayor Marty stated he concurred with Councilmember Stigney. Councilmember Gunn stated that the whole purpose of the Charter Commission is to go through the Charter and update it to make it more relevant to today. She stated that changing the wording to element makes more sense. Mr. Thomas indicated that Councilmember Stigney helped two and three years ago, and no response was received this year, and now at the process of adoption, he is bantering over the word "element" and leaving out the improvements of seven pages of incredibly difficult work to do over three years. Councilmember Stigney indicated that a closer look should be taken at the word "element". Mr. Thomas stated that Councilmember Stigney should have asked him a year ago about this. Mayor Marty asked if the resolution was presented a year ago. Mr. Thomas stated it was. Mr. Thomas stated that copies were distributed and people could have been working on it. He stated that work is being done in a statutory environment where nothing can be changed tonight without the Charter Commission discussing it. He indicated it is difficult to grasp reworking the entire chapter because someone does not like the word "element". Mounds View City Council Apri110, 2006 Regular Meeting Page 17 • • Councilmember Stigney suggested that it be brought back to the Charter Commission because there will be no unanimous vote. Mr. Thomas stated there is a timeline to deal with for the ballot issue on Chapter 7.03 that is based on an amendment to Chapter 7. Mr. Thomas indicated that the Charter Commission first submitted the resolution in February 2005 and the Council had within 60 days to put it on its agenda to adopt or send back for a recommendation. He stated this is not the first time that it gets to the adoption part of the process when it receives a substantive change to the language when it had received no previous recommendations. Councilmember Stigney indicated that the Charter Commission did not come to the Council. Councilmember Flaherty asked Councilmember Stigney if he is contending that the word "element" is being used incorrectly. Councilmember Stigney stated that the word "element" is being applied to all the things, and the word "element" does work in the correct context in Subdivision 1, but not in Subdivisions 2 through 6. Councilmember Stigney stated he would like Staff to provide a list of the appropriate and correct usage of the items in the Five-Year Financial Plan. MOTION/SECOND: MARTY/FLAHERTY. To postpone the Introduction and First Reading of Ordinance 772, an Ordinance Amending Chapter 7 of the City Charter until the April 24, 2006, Council Meeting. Councilmember Stigney asked if there will be a response from Staff as to the correct terminology. City Administrator Ulrich stated there would be. Ayes - 5 Nays - 0 Motion carried. E. Resolution 6793 Step Increase for Deputy Chief Tom Kinney of the Mounds View Police Department. Assistant to the City Administrator Crane explained a step wage increase adjustment is recommended for Deputy Police Chief Tom Kinney that is consistent with the Personnel Manual and Labor Agreements. MOTION/SECOND: STIGNEY/THOMAS. To adopt Resolution 6793 Step Increase for Deputy Chief Tom Kinney of the Mounds View Police Department. Ayes - 5 Nays - 0 Motion carried. F. Resolution 6693 Transfer of Business Ownership from Elias Saman to Khalid Ahmed for a Tobacco and Gasoline Business License for the Mounds Mounds View City Council Apri110, 2006 Regular Meeting Page 18 View BP located at 2155 Highway 10. Assistant to the City Administrator Crane explained that a transfer of ownership was requested on December 12, 2005. She noted that the City Council was made aware of Fire Code violations at the Mounds View BP property at the December 12, 2005 Council meeting, and the matter was to be readdressed once the property received a satisfactory fire inspection. She noted that the property has received a satisfactory fire inspection from the Mounds View Fire Marshall. Councilmember Flaherty stated he would have liked to see that the applicant exceeded the requirements of the Fire code. MOTION/SECOND: GUNN/THOMAS. To waive the reading and adopt Resolution 6693 Transfer of Business Ownership from Elias Saman to Khalid Ahmed for a Tobacco and Gasoline Business License for the Mounds View BP located at 2155 Highway 10. Ayes - 5 Nays - 0 .Motion carried. G. Resolution 6792 Awarding a Firm to Conduct a Salary Compensation Study and Pay Equity Report for Mounds View City Employees. City Administrator Ulrich explained that Staff received four proposals for the study. He indicated that two interviews were conducted with the two lowest bidders, and both firms indicated they could do the work satisfactorily. City Administrator noted the apparent low bidder is Laumeyer & Associates with a total bid of $11,000. MOTION/SECOND: FLAHERTY/STIGNEY. To waive the reading and adopt Resolution 6792 Awarding a Firm to Conduct a Salary Compensation Study and Pay Equity Report for Mounds View City Employees. Mayor Marty asked if the interview with Laumeyer and Associates came across well. Councilmember Flaherty stated he was very impressed by both Mr. Laumeyer and Mr. Bredy, and highly recommended approval. Councilmember Stigney stated he was also impressed by Laumeyer and Associates. He noted they were asked several difficult questions. He noted Springsted, Inc. had a problem with the time frame and would cost more. Mayor Marty liked the fact that Laumeyer and Associates met with City Staff to be more hands- on, and that they are substantially more cost effective and their bid is all-inclusive of all expenses. He stated he finds Laumeyer and Associates acceptable. Councilmember Flaherty commented that Springsted was more than willing to interview employees just as Laumeyer and Associates did. He stated he was much more comfortable with Mounds View City Council Apri110, 2006 Regular Meeting Page 19 • Laumeyer and Associates, and pointed out they were also the low bidder. Councilmember Stigney commented that Laumeyer and Associates have had more direct involvement with cities as opposed to companies. Ayes - 5 • 8. CONSENT AGENDA Nays - 0 Motion carried. Mayor Marty asked to remove Item D. Councilmember Stigney asked to remove Item E. Councilmember Flaherty asked to remove Item G. A. Licenses for Approval. B. Resolution 6788 Authorizing the Purchase of Digital Recording Equipment for the Police Department Utilizing Forfeiture Funds. C. Resolution 6791 Authorizing Mounds View City Hall to be closed on Friday, May 5, 2006, starting 12:00 Noon Due to the Move Back to the New City Hall Facility. °c~"criicn'1tE-~ea~l$~1~~9$duT~:pr~a~~ zvv6 •~-v.~i~ ••• ~ •• 41, C,cc6nu RQ&~i$g-e~-A~infl$e "e--rr~-.s~vi~aee~e~d~iir~-vsu~Ft°ci- ?-v~t~e M..,,,.ac. i7;°~, r;~, r~.°,.~°,. ~_.,~.,......,.. ., , .., pp, F. Resolution 6781 Authorizing Execution of a Joint Cooperation Agreement between Ramsey County and the City of Mounds View for the CDBG Act. --~~-:~1= ~~T~o'a-:< ~ ~ , •1 7A' 'fnn~ + ~.~n .. . c r a't~al MOTION/SECOND: THOMAS/STIGNEY. To waive the readings and approve the Consent Agenda Items A through C and F. Ayes - 5 Nays - 0 Motion carried. 8E. Resolution 6790 Approving the Contract Award for Cleaning Services for City Hall Offices and the Mounds View Police Department. Councilmember Stigney asked if the same cleaning company would clean the Mounds View Community Center. City Administrator Ulrich indicated the contract is just for cleaning at the City Hall, and the Community Center will be maintained by current City Staff as it was before. He indicated that the cleaning of the Community Center is done by part-time staff from Public Works. Councilmember Stigney asked if it is cost effective to have Staff do the cleaning. City Administrator Ulrich stated the position has been combined with other duties such as routine maintenance and repair work, and indicated he will check to see if it should the cleaning should Mounds View City Council Apri110, 2006 Regular Meeting Page 20 be bid out with the Community Center. He stated he would expect the per hour charge from the contract vendor to be less than paying a fiill-time employee. City Administrator Ulrich stated this change may be a good opportunity to free up hours for more valued maintenance work with the Community Center or additional hours outside of Public Works time. He offered to check more into it. Mayor Marty and Councilmember Stigney indicated they would like to look at this. Mayor Marty asked if Maria Alonso was ever contacted to see if she would put out a bid for cleaning services. City Administrator Ulrich stated he did not have her contact information, and the last he knew she was employed by Coverall and could not enter into an independent contract. He indicated it would have to be advertised as a separate job. Mayor Marty stated that Ms. Alonso paid Coverall for her contract with City Hall and the job was running out but she indicated she still owed payments to Coverall. Mayor Many wondered if the contract would need to be re-bid. City Administrator Ulrich indicated the contract would have to be re-bid which would take another month. City Administrator Ulrich suggested an addendum could be added to the existing contract, as Coverall was the lowest bidder by far. Councilmember Gunn asked if it is a yearly contract. City Administrator Ulrich responded that it has a 30 or 60 days termination provision. Councilmember Gunn suggested leaving the contract as it is and look into what is going on and proceed from there. Finance Director Beer stated the contract is for a period of two years. City Administrator Ulrich explained there is a termination provision in the contract. Councilmember Stigney asked if the contract would have to be re-bid with an addendum. City Administrator Ulrich indicated it would not have to be re-bid. MOTION/SECOND: THOMAS/GUNN. To waive the reading and adopt Resolution 6790 Approving the Contract Award for Cleaning Services for City Hall Offices and the Mounds View Police Department. Ayes - 5 Nays - 0 Motion carried. Councilmember Stigney confirmed that Staff will look at the possibility of an addendum. 8G. Set a Public Hearing Monday, Apri124, 2006 at 7:10 p.m. for a Conditional Use Permit for an Oversized Garage at 8495 Sunnyside Road. Mounds View City Council Apri110, 2006 Regular Meeting Page 21 Director Ericson ex lained the li p app cant is proposing to build a garage that will be slightly larger than is allowed by code without a conditional use permit. He stated it will be a three stall garage that will be used to park a recreational vehicle inside. MOTION/SECOND: FLAHERTY/STIGNEY. Set a Public Hearing Monday, Apri124, 2006 at 7:10 p.m. for a Conditional Use Permit for an Oversized Garage at 8495 Sunnyside Road. Director Ericson indicated the resolution should be amended to hold the public hearing at 7:05 p.m. Councilmembers Flaherty and Stigney agreed to the amendment. Ayes - 5 Nays - 0 Motion carried. 9. JUST AND CORRECT CLAIMS Councilmember Flaherty referenced check number 118232 for $56,064 to Jay Bros., Inc. for the Random Park Building, and asked if it was for the moving of the building. Finance Director Beer responded that this is the first payment request. Councilmember Flaherty asked what the total cost would be for the building move. Finance Director Beer stated the total cost will be approximately $240,000. Ma or M referenced check number 11 25 y arty 8 4 for $300 to Schmieg-Washburn Industries for the golf course site bids. Director Ericson responded that this is an old invoice that was for work on the billboard negotiations with Clear Channel. MOTION/SECOND: THOMAS/GUNN. To approve the Just and Correct Claims as presented. Ayes - 5 Nays - 0 Motion carried. 10. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. March 27, 2006 City Council Meeting Minutes MOTION/SECOND: GUNN/FLAHERTY. To Approve the March 27, 2006 City Council meeting minutes as corrected and with corrections that Staff received. Ayes - 5 Nays - 0 Motion carried. B. Apri13, 2006 Executive Session Minutes MOTION/SECOND: THOMAS/GUNN. To Approve the April 3, 2006 Executive Session meeting minutes as presented. Ayes - 5 Nays - 0 Motion carried. Mounds View City Council Apri110, 2006 Regular Meeting Page 22 11. RE PORTS A. Reports of Mayor and Council Councilmember Stigney commented that he received a telephone call from a resident who was unhappy that the Streets meeting was scheduled for April 13, 2006, because it is a holy day and many people will be at church and will not be able to attend. Councilmember Stigney stated that the resident also wondered if the existing street surveys would be taken into consideration or if the study will be started from scratch. Mayor Marty stated he received a question if a motorcycle club could be in the City's Festival in the Park parade. Councilmember Gunn stated that would be fine and reminded the residents that the Festival in the Park is scheduled for August 20, 2006. Mayor Marty added that the Festival in the Park is looking for volunteers, and anyone interested should call Councilmember Gunn. B. Reports of Staff 1. Assistant to the Administrator Crane Assistant to the Administrator Crane announced the 2°d Annual Town Hall Meeting will be held at the Mounds View Community Center on 5394 Edgewood Drive on Saturday, April 29, 2006. She stated the event will start at 9:00 a.m. 2. City Administrator Ulrich City Administrator Ulrich reported on the status of the supplemental appropriation before the Minnesota Legislature for the additional $400,000 in funding for the proposed noise wall extension on the south side of Trunk Highway 10. He explained that a hearing is tentatively scheduled for April 11, 2006, at 3:00 p.m., and there will be Staff present to represent the City. He invited the City Council to attend the hearing. 3. Community Development Director Ericson Director Ericson noted there is a vacancy for a resident position on the Economic Development Commission, and that the vacancy will be posted to seek applicants. Director Ericson explained that draft plans have been prepared for the Red Oak Estates #3 townhome project. He stated that floor plans and front elevations for the proposed buildings have been submitted. He mentioned the appearance and characteristics of the design work could change as it goes through the bidding process. Mounds View City Council April 10, 2006 Regular Meeting Page 23 Director Ericson stated that the existing six townhome owners do not want a swimming pool or tenms court, and in lieu of this, Mr. Harstad has offered to provide the cash equivalent of $58,000 to the Mounds View Park and Recreation Commission. Director Ericson indicated he spoke with Jim Thompson, League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust, who represented the City on the issue, and he clarified there would be no adverse issues if the City accepts the offer of financial consideration in lieu of the construction of the amenities. He stated that Mr. Thompson indicated the City is within its ability to grant a waiver of the construction of the pool and tennis court. Director Ericson suggested that a memorandum of understanding could be prepared if the Council chooses and that by drafting this memorandum, the City is not waiving its rights or responsibilities of the other conditions of the settlement. Councilmember Stigney asked who would maintain the pool and tennis courts if they were built. Director Ericson indicated the townhome owners would be responsible. Councilmember Stigney asked if the amount of $58,000 has been verified by Staff. Director Ericson indicated that estimates have not been sought, but Staff feels that this is an accurate representation of what it would cost to install a pool and tennis court. Councilmember Flaherty and Mayor Marty asked what this is based on. He stated this is based on the understanding what it would cost to make the improvements. He indicated the City may not be in a position to ask for anything else. MOTION/SECOND: THOMAS/GiJNN. To authorize Staff to draft a memorandum of understanding to accept payment from Red Oaks Estates #3 in the amount of $58,000 in lieu of constructing the pool and tennis courts, given the amount of $58,000 is able to be substantiated within $5,000. Counciimember Flaherty stated he is not suggesting negotiation, but would like to have the numbers substantiated and if they cannot be, then the issue should be readdressed. Director Ericson stated that Mr. Harstad has been asking about this issue for a couple of months, and he is prepared to move forward with construction of the pool and tennis courts. Director Ericson explained Mr. Harstad has offered to provide a cash donation to the City in lieu of the construction, and the issue can be delayed, but in the process of waiting, construction may begin on the pool and tennis courts. Councilmember Thomas stated she sees no reason the issue should be delayed if the number can be substantiated. Mayor Marty stated the six residents have expressed concerns that they do not want to have a pool or tennis courts built because of a potential increase in the assessment fee. Mayor Marty wondered if there is room on the site to build a pool and tennis courts. Director Ericson replied it would be on the northeast corner of County Road H2 and Long Lake Road. Mounds View City Council Apri110, 2006 Regular Meeting Page 24 t Ayes - 4 Nays - 1 (Marty) Motion carried. 4. Finance Director Beer Finance Director Beer explained he recently attended the Metro I-Net Users meeting, and one of the topics of discussion was in regard to Roseville evaluating the agreements with the 13 cities they are doing business with. He explained that Roseville determined that they are not charging enough, and it was initially estimated that the City of Mounds View has underpaid by $20,000. He stated the proposal is to spread out the underpayment over a three period to catch up to where Roseville thinks the City of Mounds View should be. Finance Director Beer commented that security for the Metro I-Net System was also discussed, and they would like users to have a common set of rules to loosely govern use of the system to make sure it is secure for every user. C. Reports of City Attorney • • None. 12. Next Council Work Session: Next Council Meeting: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 at 7:00 p.m. (Special Work Session with Charter Commission) Monday, Apri124, 2406 at 7:00 p.m. 13. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 10:17 p.m. Transcribed by: Annette Anderson Timesaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.