Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - 2006/08/28PROCEEDINGS OF THE MOUNDS VIEW CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA Regular Meeting August 28, 2006 Mounds View City Hall 2401 Highway 10, Mounds View, MN 55112 7:00 P.M. 1. MEETING IS CALLED TO ORDER 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. ROLL CALL: Mayor Marty, Councilmember Stigney, Councilmember Gunn, Councilmember Flaherty, and Councilmember Thomas NOT PRESENT: None. 4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA A. Monday, August 28, 2006 City Council Agenda MOTION/SECOND: GUNN/FLAHERTY. To Approve the Monday, August 28, 2006 agenda as presented. Ayes - 5 Nays - 0 Motion carried. 5. PUBLIC INPUT Tom Nelson, 8315 Red Oak Drive, stated he is concerned about traffic on his road. He mentioned there are many children on Red Oak Drive and there are lots of vehicles cutting through. He noted the speeds are very high and there are many more large trucks and buses. He stated if there is an accident on Highway 65 or on 35W, the traffic is even worse. He asked if there is anything the City can do to curb the cut through traffic. Mr. Nelson noted that there was a study done 10 years ago and the Mayor at that time had said there was no problem. He stated that the traffic is horrendous and out of control. He asked the City to do something to slow traffic down and deter cut-through. Mayor Marty stated he spoke with Public Works Director Lee and noted a traffic count was done several years ago and the City should have it in their records. He suggested Public Works compare the traffic counts from then and those that were done more recently. Director Lee stated Public Works is aware of the problems and there are traffic counts for every odd year back Mounds View City Council August 28, 2006 Regular Meeting Page 2 • through the 1980s. He stated the City will investigate ways to make Red Oak Drive less enticing to cut-through drivers and stated the City would look at ways to cut down on the traffic as part of this next year's street project. He stated that Red Oak is currently a municipal state aid road and the City may be limited as far as what they could do. He noted that several options could be considered during next year's street project. Mayor Marty stated the City would need to seriously consider traffic counting because once the street is improved it will be more inviting to cut-through traffic. He stated the City would look at Red Oak for improvement next year and the following year. He stated the traffic count would compare traffic. He stated there have also been complaints about other roads in the City. He noted such complaints are considered when the streets come up for discussion. Councilmember Flaherty asked if the City could get the numbers for Red Oak and Long Lake Road from the previous traffic counts. Director Lee stated he has already started compiling the numbers and will have them to present to the council soon. He noted where the counts are taking place and added that the counts he will presented to the Council. Mayor Marty noted there have also been constant complaints about Groveland and that Red Oak Drive has two stop signs while Groveland only has one. Councilmember Gunn stated she is familiar with the traffic on Red Oak. She noted that most of • the bus traffic on the street is from Lorenz and asked if the City could do anything about it. She stated she does not know the reason for the increased semi traffic, but that she has noticed more semis on Red Oak Drive. Councilmember Thomas stated that the Council needs better information about where the semis are coming from and why. She stated the issue is that if the City cuts off Red Oak Drive, the traffic will use other City streets, such as Long Lake and Groveland. Mr. Nelson stated the speed on the last three blocks of Red Oak is 50+ miles per hour. He said that the City needs to do something to slow the traffic down because it is scary. He said the City needs to consider all options before someone gets hurt. Director Lee stated the Police Department has purchased a speed analyzer so there could be a speed analysis on the road. He stated once Groveland is done, the analyzer would be moved to Red Oak. James Nelson, Tom Nelson's next-door neighbor, stated that SYSCO regularly uses Red Oak Drive. He stated he has offered his driveway for the Police to use as a speed trap. He stated there needs to be a better solution and that he is worried about the safety of the children who live along the street. Hollis Lindberg, 8454 Pleasant View Drive, asked about the impact the Anoka County Airport • runway extension will have on air traffic over Mounds View. Mounds View City Council August 28, 2006 Regular Meeting Page 3 • Mayor Marty stated that everything that was printed in the paper has been in the works for many years. He stated Mounds view curtailed the north-south runway expansion, but the east-west expansion was never set back. He stated the runway and Instrument Landing System have been planned for quite some time. He added in 1999 or 2000 Mounds View got a 20-year moratorium on the north-south runway. He stated that the MAC originally wanted to construct north-south parallel runways. Mayor Marty noted that Blaine has been in favor of the airport and expansion, however, with new high-end development north of the airport, Blaine residents may be allies in opposition to the north-south runway. He also noted that the new eight-story Medtronic building could help Mounds View by keeping some of the north-south traffic down. He also noted the phone number on the website for complaints about air traffic noise. David Jahnke, 8248 Edgewood Drive, replied to the airport noise comment. He stated he belongs to the airport commission. He explained that there would always be air noise and that the airport is no different than a highway and pilots can use the airport at any time. He stated that pilots would try to abide by certain rules. Mr. Jahnke explained that there is nothing the City can do to reduce traffic and the airport will be getting busier. He commented that if there is anything he can do for the City, he will do it at the next meeting. Mayor Marty noted that Mr. Jahnke is one of two Mounds View representatives • on the airport commission. Mike Reed, 2208 Lois Drive, stated that several years ago a phone survey was done about the golf course and community center. He noted that at that time, nobody supported either venture. He stated that the community center currently costs the City $147,000 a year, with another $175,000 in added expenses. He asked why the City is not selling the community center. Mayor Marry noted that the Community Center is an asset and benefit to the community and residents. He stated that the Council has been trying to make it work as a banquet center, and they have finally come to the conclusion that a caterer and banquet center are not viable uses. He noted the task force was started last January, which was made up of commissioners, elected off cials, and citizens, who started brainstorming about better uses for the center. He stated that more citizens have been expressing interest in the center. He stated if there are three or four weddings or events a month, it would be helpful. He noted that there is an ongoing discussion about the Center. Mr. Reed expressed his opinion that it is a lot of money to spend on the community center. Mayor Marty stated he has been contacted by residents who used other cities' banquet centers when the caterers at Mounds View's community center were too expensive. Mr. Reed asked how long the City would keep the center open without making a profit. Councilmember Flaherty stated that when the survey was done, residents were not using the community center because it was too expensive. He stated that the current discussion is surrounding whether or not the residents will use the center. He noted that the center is similar to Mounds View City Council August 28, 2006 Regular Meeting Page 4 the parks, which are subsidized. He stated that the current discussion is whether or not residents will use it if it is more affordable. Mr. Reed stated that he asked the same question a few years back, when the center was costing the City $90,000 a year, and that the City needs to seriously consider the cost to the citizens. Carol Mueller, 8340 Groveland Road, stated that the Cub Scouts are currently meeting at the Community Center. She stated that the troop tried to use the center with the previous caterers, but they could not afford it at that time. She stated that the troop is excited to have the space at the center to hold meetings and events. She stated that the center is a benefit to the city and those who come into the City will be served as well. She stated that she understands it is subsidized by the city and it is a service that residents appreciate. She also asked that the City consider a different location for the theater group. Jeff Abler, 8331 Red Oak Drive, stated he is a recent transplant to Mounds View and when he moved here, he loved the neighborhood and area. He stated his concern is the volume of traffic on Red Oak Drive and the size and speed of the vehicles. He stated there is some awareness from the City, but stated there are significant amounts of traffic and speeds are very fast. Mr. Abler stated the road is not in good condition and cannot handle the speed, amount of traffic, and weight of the large vehicles. He stated that Red Oak has become the main north to south cut- through for people avoiding 35W or Highway 65. He asked that the Council address the issue at an upcoming meeting. He noted Long Lake Road is a County road and is better equipped to handle traffic than Red Oak Drive and others such as Groveland. Mayor Marty noted the issue would be up for future discussion. Rick Perrozzi, 7791 Groveland Road, stated that some of the Council is wondering about the PAC Building. He stated that the property to the back was being held for a future parking lot. He stated that the watershed district wants to ensure that the water from the property goes through the pre-treatment ponds before the main pond. Mr. Perrozzi stated that the taxes for the property have gone up. He stated that the watershed district knew he wanted to make the area a parking lot and brought the issue to the attention of Velmeir. Mr. Perrozzi noted that the watershed district ruined the property and will not have it graded for a parking lot. He stated that he asked the watershed to speak with Jim LaValle regarding what happened to the paper that was signed at the closing but then altered. He stated that because it was done, the City would not approve the parking lot. He stated that he hired an engineer whose opinion it was that the project was doomed from the start. He stated the CVS site could have been lowered in order to accommodate his property. Mr. Perrozzi noted that Community Development Director Ericson stated he, Mr. Perrozzi, was • the reason the project was not done. He stated the property was kept for parking, and if there is no parking, the integrity of the building is compromised. He stated that tenants would like to Mounds View City Council August 28, 2006 Regular Meeting Page 5 come in to the building, but they all ask when the parking lot will be done. He stated that he could not lease the building until the parking is done. Mr. Perrozzi stated that he worked with Velmeir with the piece of property and they need to take care of it. He also asked why he could not speak with the City's engineers who worked on the project. He said he will pay for the engineers' time for the meeting. Mr. Perrozzi stated he is trying to mediate this situation and will begin litigation unless he can get it done. He asked if the City is powerless to do anything. He noted his concern that it is taking so long. He stated last fall he went to the watershed district, he told the property owners last fall what the district needed, and nothing was done. He stated that the watershed district has to submit a plan, the City would approve the plan, but Velmeir is not doing anything to approve it. He stated there are two months to get the parking lot done. He also explained all of the steps that have to be taken in order to approve the parking lot with the watershed district. He stated he has done everything he can, but Velmeir has not. Mayor Marty noted that there are two pieces of private property, one owned by CVS, one owned by Mr. Perrozzi. He stated the City is unable to tell either property owner what to do. He stated that if he and the other property owner cannot make it work, they may have to go to court. He stated he has discussed the problem with Director Ericson and Mr. Perrozzi and stated the City does not have much leverage between two private property owners. • Mr. Perrozzi stated that the positioning of the streetlight ruins his property and he has asked the other properly owner to move the light. He stated when he has hired an attorney and stood his ground, the other property owner has finally listened. He noted the other problems. Mayor Marty stated that Mr. Perrozzi has exceeded his three minutes and asked Director Ericson to try and set up a meeting between Velmeir and Mr. Perrozzi to try and work something out. Director Ericson stated that Mr. Perrozzi's engineers have spoken to the watershed district, but that the plan needs to be in place before it could be reviewed. He stated that there should be resolution this week. He stated he would contact the owner of Velmeir and the engineers to set up a meeting. Mayor Marty stated he would appreciate such a meeting. Mr. Perrozzi stated he would pay the costs of the engineers. He stated he would like to know how the grades were approved and how the project was set up. He said he wants to get the parking lot done to bring in tenants. Director Ericson stated he is not sure if the engineers would help the problem. Mr. Perrozzi stated it would help him determine the liability of the plan. He questioned why the City would approve the plan for the parking lot when it may not be viable. Mayor Marty asked Director Ericson to look into the issue and report back to the City. Mr. Perrozzi stated he would like an answer and will contact the engineers himself. Mounds View City Council August 28, 2006 Regular Meeting Page 6 David Jahnke thanked Councilmember Gunn for all of the work she did for the Festival in the Park. He stated that Mounds View has the best fireworks. He added that if the City contact SYSCO about the trucks on Red Oak Drive, the issue would be addressed. He addressed the Community Center and stated he has not spoken to many citizens who would use the Center. Ken Glidden, 5240 Edgewood Drive, went on record that he supports the Community Center. 6. SPECIAL ORDER OF BUSINESS A. City Council Meeting Minutes, July 24, 2006. Mayor Marty noted he had presented his corrections to City Administrator Ulrich last week. Councilmember Thomas noted a few corrections. MOTION/SECOND: MARTY/THOMAS. To Approve the Monday, July 24, City Council Meeting Minutes, as corrected. Ayes - 5 Nays - 0 Motion carried. 7. COUNCIL BUSINESS A. Public Hearing, Introduction, and First Reading of Ordinance 778, an Ordinance Implementing a Franchise Fee on Xcel Energy Electric and Natural Gas Operations within the City of Mounds View for the Year 2007. Finance Director Beer explained that about a month and a half ago he spoke with Xcel's government relations representative to explain that the City was considering passing a levy. He stated Xcel sent a letter responding to the right-of--way permit fees stating that the City cannot charge a franchise fee and a permit fee. He noted that City Attorney Riggs is reviewing the letter. Finance Director Beer stated that currently the City imposes a 4% franchise fee for natural gas. He stated the City has budgeted $270,000 for both the general fund and street improvement fund for 2007. He stated he recommends opening the public hearing Mayor Marty opened the public hearing at 7:50 p.m. Hearing no comments, Mayor Marty closed the public hearing at 7:50 p.m. Councilmember Stigney asked if the $270,000 includes fees from Centerpoint Energy as well. Finance Director Beer stated very little is generated from Centerpoint and Xcel is the main contractor. He also corrected a few typos in the staff report. Attorney Riggs stated he will review the letter and will respond to the Council during the second reading at the next Council meeting. Mounds View City Council August 28, 2006 Regular Meeting Page 7 MOTION/SECOND: GUNN/FLAHERTY. To waive reading and approve Introduction, and First Reading of Ordinance 778, an Ordinance Implementing a Franchise Fee on Xcel Energy Electric and Natural Gas Operations within the City of Mounds View for the Year 2007. Ayes - 5 Nays - 0 Motion carried. B. Public Hearing, Introduction, and First Reading of Ordinance 779, an Ordinance Implementing a Franchise Fee on Center Point Energy Natural Gas Operations within the City of Mounds View for the Year 2007. Finance Director Beer stated it would be a continuation of the agreement with Centerpoint for 4% franchise fee. He noted there is only one Centerpoint customer in the City and the revenue generated is very low. He stated that Medtronic has the option to choose between Centerpoint and Xcel and revenues from Centerpoint could go up. Mayor Marty opened the public hearing at 7:53 p.m. Hearing no comment, Mayor Marty closed the public hearing at 7:53 p.m. Councilmember Thomas asked if there was any response from Centerpoint. Finance Director • Beer replied that the agreement was not amended and Centerpoint did not respond. He also pointed out a few typos in the staff report. MOTION/SECOND: THOMAS/FLAHERTY. To waive the reading and approve Introduction, and First Reading of Ordinance 779, an Ordinance Implementing a Franchise Fee on Center Point Energy Natural Gas Operations within the City of Mounds View for the Year 2007. Ayes - 5 Nays - 0 Motion carried. C. Public Hearing, Resolution 6906 Holding a Public Hearing, Approving the Feasibility Report and Ordering the County Road 10 Trailway Project for Segments 9 &10 Public Works Director Lee explained that in January, the Council authorized a feasibility report regarding construction of a trailway on the south side of County Road 10 between Silver Lake Road and Long Lake Road. He stated it was reviewed at a work session and was set as a Council agenda item on August 14th. Director Lee explained that the project proposed is a 10-foot bituminous trailway, which would include a boardwalk. He noted it includes pedestrian scale lighting and every 5th light will have a City medallion. He stated the project proposes storm water infiltration features and water quality enhancement, which will include vegetated areas and rain gardens. He stated landscape features • will be included such as mass plantings such as tall grasses mixed with perennial plants, including landscape mounds and tree groves. Mounds View City Council August 28, 2006 Regular Meeting Page 8 Director Lee noted there would be five benches installed, six trash receptacles, a bike rack, planters, three locations for signage and an information kiosk for City information. He stated that the project also identified seven trailway alternative connections. Director Lee explained that the estimated cost of the project is $736,800, with the connection alternatives at a cost of $468,300, for a total cost just over $1.2 million. He noted where the connection alternatives are and identified where they would be located. He explained where there would be a wetland overlook and crossing. He stated there would be a connection at Silver View Plaza, which would connect to private properties, and a trailway for the Ramsey County Library. Director Lee stated Staff recommends holding off on the alternative connections but approving the initial construction. He stated that the City could postpone the connection alternatives until the trailway is finished. He stated that if the connection alternatives are 100% funded by the private properties, the City could go forward with those. Director Lee noted the Council must examine funding sources such as TIF. He noted the project schedule, and if the Council approves the project, construction would begin January 2, 2007, with the project completed in Fa112007. Director Lee stated that Staff recommends approving the feasibility report, order the project, and authorize the preparations of plans and specifications. He stated if the Council would like to go forward with the connection alternative, that they begin looking into easement. Director Lee stated direction is needed regarding if the base project is acceptable as proposed, how the City would like to deal with connection alternatives, and how the project should be funded. Mayor Many opened the public hearing at 8:09 p.m. Jonathan Thomas, 8040 Groveland Road, stated he has significant concern about the trees and shrubs that were a part of the walkway plan along the highway. He stated that such landscaping could lead to very difficult visibility for side roads connecting to the main road. He urged caution regarding visibility when planning. Director Lee stated that agenda item 7L deals with design and landscaping. He stated that the goal is to discuss a consistent landscape plan for the entire corridor and ensuring proper sight lines going forward. Mike Reed, 2208 Lois Drive, asked how many people would use the path. He noted that it is an awful lot of money to be spending if the City does not know how it will be used. Mayor Marty replied that Silver View Park Trails are used very often and the trailway on County Road H is • also being used. He stated the City is trying to make County Road 10 a safe corridor for residents. He stated that the sidewalks and trailways that have been put in already have been used Mounds View City Council August 28, 2006 Regular Meeting Page 9 more than the City had hoped. Mayor Marty mentioned that during a seminar about walkable communities the point was raised that people are using such trailways more with the price of gas rising and increased health awareness. He stated if trailways and sidewalks are available, they will help both the City and residents. Councilmember Thomas stated there are many nice benefits to the trailways, particularly for those who already walk on the sides of the highways. She stated many people do not cross at the intersections and safety is a main concern. She also noted the school districts and that sidewalks and trailways will ensure that people are not walking on County Road 10. Mayor Marty noted that there are sections where people are walking on the shoulder, not even in the grass along the side of the road, but there are also worn paths in the grass from pedestrian traffic. Councilmember Gunn stated she has noticed mothers pushing strollers along County Road 10. She noted there are single-family homes and apartment buildings along the road where people walk. She added that there are several residents who bike to work and the trailways and sidewalks will be utilized. She said she hopes more of the kids will be using sidewalks instead of the sides of the street to get to school. • Jeff Eide, manager of the Ramsey County Library, 2576 County Road 10, stated that a significant portion of their visitors walk or bike to the library. He noted that their bike rack was beyond capacity and that they have added a second bike rack due to bike traffic. He stated many people will use the trailway. He also mentioned concerns regarding the alternate connection. George Weinke, 2704 County Road 10, stated his concern is that he pushes snow up to the front of his lot, which will be piled up on the trailway. He stated his concern is about when the trailway goes in that the snow will melt across the trailway. He suggested the City put a culvert in that area because there will be an ice issue over the trailway in the spring. Mr. Weinke proposed that the City engineer look at the area before the trailway is approved. He stated that the City needs to consider a way to prevent the water building up on the trailway area. He noted the property's topographical characteristics and suggested ways to improve the drainage. He stated the City may have a liability issue due to flooding and potential melting and freezing. Councilmember Thomas stated the City needs to consider such issues with all properties regarding snow removal and that the landscaping plan needs to have summer and winter landscaping considerations. Councilmember Flaherty stated that Mr. Weinke's neighbors may have the same issues. Mr. Weinke replied that there may be such issues and reiterated his concerns with snow removal. Mayor Marty pointed out that it may be an issue on the north side as well. Mr. Weinke noted that Mounds View City Council August 28, 2006 Regular Meeting Page 10 many of the property owners have more room than he does for snow removal. Mike Gross, who manages the Kraus Anderson properties,. stated that he likes the plan and has a few small concerns. He stated one is the landscaping and they are worried about how planting will visually affect the building. He noted his concern about the alternate crossings that might encroach on his parking. He asked whose responsibility it will be to maintain the connections. Mr. Winiecki also brought up concerns about maintenance of the trailway. He asked if the City will be responsible, and Mayor Marty replied it would in fact be the City's responsibility. Mr. Weinke also asked about where the trail will be located. Councilmember Thomas explained that there are alternatives being discussed. Hearing no further comment, Mayor Marty closed the public hearing at 8:18 p.m. Councilmember Flaherty stated that the trailway and redevelopment of the corridor has been identified by both the Council and residents through surveys as a major priority. He stated that he has seen residents walking along County Road 10 and he is concerned about safety. He noted his favor for approving the project. Councilmember Stigney stated that he believes f nancing should be from TIF and connection alternatives should be postponed. He stated his concern with the boardwalk, and asked about bridge sections from the golf course. Director Lee stated Staff is looking into the possibility of using the bridge sections. Councilmember Stingy noted his concerns about the lighting scheme lights that were put in outside the City Hall did not put out enough light and he would like lighting that puts out more light. Director Lee replied that the medallions from the City Hall lights outside were included but the actual lights on the trailway will be different. He stated better lights will be considered. Mayor Marty stated he would like the trailway on alI of County Road 10 before connections are considered. He noted the significant cost of the connections. He stated if connections are put in, trailways elsewhere might not get built. He said if property owners want connections and will buy-in to the connections and pay for them, then the City should consider working with the property owners. Mayor Marty asked if there will be problems with the boardwalk being built on frozen ground in January. Director Lee stated there would be pylons ensuring it would stay in place. Mayor Marry noted his approval of the project. Councilmember Thomas stated she agrees with Councilmember Stigney that whatever portion of the project the City cannot fund through grants should be paid for by TIF. Finance Director Beer stated that in the five-year plan, TIF was proposed to pay for such items Mayor Marty stated that the City decided to go with BRAA a number of years ago because of their scope and ability to seek out alternate funding such as grants. He stated that other than the Mounds View City Council August 28, 2006 Regular Meeting Page 11 grants, the trailway would be funded by TIF with no assessments. MOTION/SECOND: GUNK/THOMAS. To waive the reading and adopt Resolution 6906 Holding a Public Hearing, Approving the Feasibility Report and Ordering the County Road 10 Trailway Project for Segments 9 &10, with corrections. Ayes - 5 Nays - 0 Motion carried. D. Status Report in regard to the Negotiation of a Interim Lease Agreement with Oops Dinner Theatre in the Mounds View Community Center Economic Development Coordinator Backman reported that at the July 24~' meeting, the Council directed Staff to prepare an interim lease with the Oops Dinner Theater. He stated several areas were discussed such as the revenue model and scheduling consideration. He stated Staff has met with Oops and the YMCA and has discussed the interim lease with the City Attorney. Coordinator Backman noted that negotiations are ongoing and that the City has received a quote to remove some walls in the center to create a larger space, which would cost $3,100. He stated removal of the walls would take 1 day and completion of the project would take one week. Coordinator Backman stated that the item will be moved to next Tuesday's work session for • further discussion. Mayor Marty stated he would like to have the past five years of Oops' finances to determine the strength of the organization. He stated he would also like an Operator and Maintenance agreement with the Theater to ensure that the Theater pays for their trash and other upkeep expenses. E. Resolution 6921 Approving Ballot Language in Regard to Chapter 7 of the Mounds View Charter City Administrator Ulrich stated that City Attorney Riggs has prepared three proposed ballot language alternatives for discussion and approval. He stated the third alternative would be a summary of the language, which would hopefully make the language easy to understand. City Administrator Ulrich stated how the ballot question would read. City Administrator Ulrich stated the City Attorney Riggs has reviewed the mater and the recommendation is to approve question number three. He stated the Charter needs to go to the County by September 15`x' and Staff recommends Council approval. Councilmember Stigney asked if the question will be followed by a "yes, no." City Administrator Ulrich replied that it would. Mayor Marty stated he was concerned with the previous recommendations and believes the Mounds View City Council August 28, 2006 Regular Meeting Page 12 current recommendation is much more clear and concise. He stated that if it looks like the budget will exceed the projected income, that in order for the City to do this without incurring an additional $10,000 for a special election, the City needs to work on the budget earlier in the year to ensure that the a ballot question will be ready for the election and a special election will not be needed. Mayor Marty stated he does not anticipate the problem arising in the near future, but possibly 10- 15years down the road, the cap on spending could be an issue. He stated his second concern is if inflation increases significantly and if the inflation is up to or great than 10%, and if the City is capped at 5% or the rate of inflation +2%, the city could be in a quandary. William Werner, 2765 Sherwood Road, stated Mayor Marty's concerns could be discussed ahead of time. He stated the Council needs to be frugal if inflation rises. Councilmember Thomas stated that if the Council does what it needs to do, the numbers would be in place in time for the City to react properly. She stated that if the inflation rate rises, the City should consider cutting the budget before calling a special election. She stated that the City would need some serious discussions if there is large inflation and that is the point of the Charter language. Mr. Werner stated he is disturbed that funds can be used to reduce the budget deficit. He stated • such action should take place after the City meets the goal of the low percentage. He stated work needs to be done to ensure that the inflation rate and potential shortfalls should be considered in the initial budget, rather than using the general fund instead Mayor Marty stated he would like the levy limit at 0% as long as possible. He stated that he would like to guard the Ievy reduction fund to make it last as long as possible without having to use it. He stated he would only like to use the levy reduction fund if it is absolutely necessary. Mr. Werner stated that the Council should insist that the budget meets the criteria of 5% of inflation +2% initially. Councilmember Flaherty responded that that is exactly what the Council would like to do and is committed to such a plan. He stated the only item the City would use the levy reduction fund if absolutely necessary. Councilmember Flaherty started that the budget is prepared with that in place. Councilmember Stigney asked which CPI would be used and asked if it should be identified or footnoted. He also asked for clarification regarding the language "set limits, with any increases" and stated he would like it to be singular, reading "increase." Councilmember Thomas stated there are several funding sources and there are multiple issues. Councilmember Stigney clarified that there is only one increase - 5% or the CPI + 2%. City Attorney Riggs stated that the word increase is acceptable. City Attorney Riggs responded that it is incumbent for people to look at the published change of . the Charter. He noted the CPI is set out in the first chapter of the Charter. He stated the proposed question is the best summation of the changes and that he is recommending approval. Mounds View City Council August 28, 2006 Regular Meeting Page 13 • Councilmember Thomas stated that the language needs to be a summary and easily understood by the general public. Mayor Marty asked why the change would not go into affect until March 2007. Mr. Thomas stated that after discussing the issue with Finance Director Beer, it was determined that March would be the best time for it to be implemented so the budget would not be completely affected. He stated it will take affect before the next budget cycle, but after the current budget cycle is completed. MOTION/SECOND: STIGNEY/GUNN. To waive the reading and adopt Resolution 6921 Approving Ballot Language in Regard to Chapter 7 of the Mounds View Charter. Ayes - 5 Nays - 0 Motion carried. F. Resolution 6922 Approving the 2006-2007 AFSCME Union Contract City Administrator Ulrich stated that the item is presented for approval approving labor agreement with AFSCME union, which represents a number of employees at the City. City Administrator Ulrich stated the principal items are wages and insurance. He noted wages • and insurance coverage are proposed to be the same as the other non-union employee groups. He stated that the different item is Number 11, the Wage Re-opener. City Administrator Ulrich stated Staff is recommending approval of the Contract as outlined in the Resolution. Councilmember Flaherty said the HR Committee worked on the contract and stated that the objective was to bring all contracts in line with each other. He stated it is an excellent contract and the only thing was the wage re-opener, which states that wages can be adjusted in accordance with wage equity laws. MOTION/SECOND: FLAHERTY/THOMAS. To waive the reading and adopt Resolution 6922 Approving the 2006-2007 AFSCME Union Contract. Mayor Many thanked the HR Committee, Mr. Ulrich, Ms. Crane, the Union Representatives and Union for working out the contract. Ayes - 5 Nays - 0 Motion carried. G. Resolution 6923 Step Increase for Heidi Heller, Mounds View Planning Associate and Peter Bening, Mounds View Police Officer. City Administrator Ulrich read the resolution. Mounds View City Council August 28, 2006 Regular Meeting Page 14 • MOTION/SECOND: THOMAS/STIGNEY. To adopt Resolution 6923 Step Increase for Heidi Heller, Mounds View Planning Associate and Peter Berling, Mounds View Police Officer. Ayes - 5 Nays - 0 Motion carried. H. Appeal of charges associated with Summary Abatement at 5300-02 Raymond Avenue. Housing/Code Enforcement Inspector Anderson stated that on June 14, Staff received information about a large amount of garbage and debris on the boulevard of 5300-02 Raymond Avenue. He stated that the information was received and no action was immediately taken, as Thursday is the regularly scheduled garbage pickup day. Housing/Code Enforcement Inspector Anderson stated that on Friday, June 16, 2006 staff received a second report indicating that the garbage pile remained on the property and had grown larger. He stated Staff responded to investigate on June 16`t' and found the garbage was in the nature of rotting food and household garbage. He stated that due to the immediate health hazard, Staff ordered a summary abatement to remove the garbage. Housing/Code Enforcement Inspector Anderson stated that Staff billed the property owner, who is here appealing the chares. • Mr. Anthony Osuji, 5300 Raymond Avenue, stated that he was not aware of the violation. He stated the City did not notify him of the violation nor did they give him any time to remove the garbage. Mr. Osuji asked the Council to reconsider the charges. Councilmember Flaherty asked if the resident knew anything about the garbage. Mr. Osuji stated the resident denied knowing about the problem and that other people were putting their garbage in front of the property. Councilmember Flaherty asked if the resident contacted the City about the garbage. Mr. Osuji stated that he was not contacted. Councilmember Flaherty asked if the resident was Mr. Osuji's renter. Mr. Osuji stated she was formerly a tenant but is no longer. Councilmember Thomas stated that he should try to recoup the charges from the renter and asked what the City's position is regarding notification about such conditions. She asked if it's the property owner or tenant's responsibility to take care of the property She asked if the City attempted to contact the tenant or owner and asked who was the responsible parry to receive notice. Housing/Code Enforcement Inspector Jeremiah Anderson replied that when Staff arrived on-site, there was no answer at the property. He stated that at that point, the tenant may have vacated the unit and Staff only knocked on the door. He said they did not attempt to make any further contact. • Housing/Code Enforcement Inspector Anderson stated that because the large accumulation and nature of the trash as food, which was attracting flies and other insects, that Staff determined the Mounds View City Council August 28, 2006 Regular Meeting Page 15 • risk to the public was too great to wait to contact the owner. Councilmember Thomas stated that Staff should have made an attempt to contact the owner of the property rather than just knocking on the door. Mayor Marty asked if there was any record of contact for the homeowner. Housing/Code Enforcement Inspector Anderson stated that there is no record of occupants in the home, but there is a license for duplex rentals that has the owner's phone number and contact information. He stated that the phone number was called before the public works department removed the garbage. He stated there was no answer and he could not recall if a message was left. Mr. Osuji stated that there was no call or message. He stated that Housing/Code Enforcement Housing/Code Enforcement Inspector Anderson indicated that he did not call Mr. Osuji. Mr. Osuji stated if he was notified he would have taken care of the garbage. He stated he has a phone that he answers 24-hours and that the City should have his number on file. Councilmember Gunn asked if an inspection was done after the tenant moved out. Mr. Osuji explained that he was told the garbage was left by other parties, not by his tenant. Councilmember Flaherty stated he found it difficult to believe that someone else dumped such a • large amount of trash on his lawn. He asked if Mr. Osuji inspected the home and if the tenant got her deposit back. Mr. Osuji stated he inspected the property before the garbage was left and that he sent the deposit back to the tenant. Councilmember Flaherty asked if the garbage was on the property when he finished his inspection. Mr. Osuji stated the garbage was not there when he inspected the property. Councilmember Flaherty asked if it is possible to recoup the charges from the tenant. Mr. Osuji stated he cannot recoup any of the cost from his tenant, who insists she was not responsible for the garbage. Councilmember Flaherty asked Mr. Osuji if he believed half of the charge would be fair. Mr. Osuji replied that he believed half would be fair. Director Ericson stated that the garbage needed to be addressed immediately and Mr. Anderson worked within the code to make sure the problem was addressed. He stated Mr. Anderson was not required to make contact with the property owner due to the nature of the offense. Councilmember Thomas stated that an hour is an acceptable period of time to ensure that an attempt to contact the properly owner was made. She stated that the City should have made all attempts. She stated she believed Mr. Osuji was victimized by an abusive tenant. Councilmember Gunn stated she sees this as a problem as having outside-the-community property owners. She stated she believes it was Mr. Osuji's responsibility to keep track of the property and the tenant, especially before any deposit was returned. Mounds View City Council August 28, 2006 Regular Meeting Page 16 Councilmember Gunn noted that there are other properties in the City that have the same problems. She stated she believes the charges are dropped, but not by half, and that Mr. Osuji's responsibility is to recoup some of the costs from his tenant. Councilmember Stigney stated that if a property is leased, it is the property owner's responsibility to maintain his property. He stated that Mr. Osuji is responsible regardless of the tenant and it was the City's right to correct the problem and bill the property owner. Mayor Marty stated the invoice was the City's cost to clean up the garbage. He stated he believes Mr. Osuji's tenant is not being honest, but the City had to incur the cost to clean up the garbage and if the cost is reduced, the City will have to absorb the cost. Mayor Marty stated he believes Mr. Osuji's tenant should reimburse the costs. MOTION/SECOND: STIGNEY/GUNK. To waive the reading and adopt Resolution 6929, affirming charges associated with abatement of violations at 5300-02 Raymond Avenue Mounds. Councilmember Flaherty stated that he believes the tenant is costing Mr. Osuji money. He stated that the City could have done better trying to contact him and that he would be in favor of reducing the charges. • Mr. Osuji stated he returned his tenant's deposit within the 21 days as required by law and that he was not aware of the garbage within the time period. Mayor Marty stated that the City needed to deal with the problem and Mr. Osuji should take up the issue with his former tenant. Ayes - 4 Nays - 1 (Flaherty) Motion carried. Councilmember Thomas suggested the Council discuss the notification procedures for such abatements. I. Resolution 6919 Authorizing an Abatement of Junk and Debris outside of 2318 Knoll Drive. Housing/Code Enforcement Inspector Anderson stated on May 22, 2006 Staff inspected the property in response to allegations of exterior storage in violation of city code. He stated Staff spoke to the property owner on May 22, 2006, explained the City ordinance and requirements, and issued a notice of violation to Mr. Wies citing Section 607.03 Subdivision 3c of the City Code, which required that corrective actions were completed by June 22, 2006. Housing/Code Enforcement Inspector Anderson stated staff did perform follow-up inspections and did not notice any change in the property. He stated that there were substantial violations in 2003 and 2004 at the property. He stated that approval by the Council will provide Staff 10 days for the action. Mounds View City Council August 28, 2006 Regular Meeting Page 17 • Housing/Code Enforcement Inspector Anderson stated he spoke with Mr. Wies and Mr. Wies is taking significant action to conform to code. Councilmember Thomas asked why such debris is collecting there. Housing/Code Enforcement Inspector Anderson replied that Mr. Wies collects scrap metal to supplement his income and does do some repair work for which he uses some of the debris. Councilmember Thomas asked if Mr. Wies is aware that exterior storage is never allowable in the City. Housing/Code Enforcement Inspector Anderson stated that Mr. Wies has been moving some of his items to a separate storage facility. Councilmember Gunn asked about the tanks and barrels that are shown in the photos. Housing/Code Enforcement Inspector Anderson replied that there are welding materials and other such materials. He stated that the abatement has noted the barrels and containers. Councilmember Gunn asked if there are hazardous materials in the barrels. Housing/Code Enforcement Inspector Anderson stated he does not know for sure. Mayor Marty noted that the tent canopies are in violation of City code also, which were not listed in the abatement. He also asked why the property was not given a citation. • Housing/Code Enforcement Inspector Anderson stated that Mr. Wies has been cited for the tent and temporary structure. He stated Staff wanted to focus on the most egregious of the offenses. He stated that there is an open dialogue between the City and Mr. Wies and court citations are not the best option at this point. Housing/Code Enforcement Inspector Anderson stated that the Resolution would provide Mr. Wies with a 10-day period to address the problem. MOTION/SECOND: THOMAS/MARTY. To waive the reading and adopt Resolution 6919 Authorizing an Abatement of Junk and Debris outside of 2318 Knoll Drive. Councilmember Flaherty asked if Mr. Wies is aware that if the City has to go through abatement that he will receive the bill. Housing/Code Enforcement Inspector Anderson stated Mr. Wies is aware of such action. Mayor Marty asked if Mr. Wies would be informed if such action will be taken. Housing/Code Enforcement Inspector Anderson stated upon approval, Staff will contact Mr. Wies to inform him of the 10-day period. Ayes - 5 Nays - 0 Motion carried. J. Resolution 6924 Approving the Final Plat for the Subdivision of 8360 Long Lake Road. Mounds View City Council August 28, 2006 Regular Meeting Page 18 • Planning Associate Heller explained that the property owner has an agreement with the applicant, which will divide the property into three half-acre lots. She noted that the lots meet and exceed the minimum lot sizes in the City and that the current home on the lot will be demolished. Planning Associate Heller explained that there would be a large buffer area. She stated that the final plat has not changed from the preliminary plat that was approved. She stated that all easements have been dedicated. She noted that the development is consistent to the comprehensive plan. She noted the local water management plan has been satisfied, park dedication requirements would be met and all utilities are already accessible from the street. Planning Associate Heller stated that other than a call at the beginning of the project, there have been no objections to the project. She added that the Planning Commission and Council had both unanimously approved the project in the preliminary stage. MOTION/SECOND: STIGNEY/THOMAS. To waive the reading and adopt Resolution 6924 Approving the Final Plat for the Subdivision of 8360 Long Lake Road. Councilmember Thomas noted that she was satisfied with the tree preservation on the site. Mayor Marry agreed and noted that the sixth "now therefore be it resolved" on the resolution gives him satisfaction that the City has covered all potential problems. Ayes - 5 Nays - 0' Motion carried. K. Resolution 6927 Approving Authorization to Purchase Cable Equipment. Communications Coordinator Blackford stated that she added the tax to the total, which brings it to $25,209. She stated she did look into a different television set, which dropped the price by several hundred dollars. She stated that even though the screen size is the same, the television itself is too big for the original site and if it was hung, it would cost an additional $200. She noted that the standard television would be cheaper, but the added cost would be to meet code and hang it. Communications Coordinator Blackford addressed the question regarding the "glitch" between the split-screens. She stated that the time base corrector is needed so there is no jump when switching from one camera to the next. Communications Coordinator Blackford stated some of the items are needed because the City is borrowing some items from CTV that must be returned. She stated she did request a quote from EDA Audio, but they will not bid because they could not complete the project. She stated she still only has one installation bid price from Alpha Video. She suggested Alpha Video because they have the cheapest equipment price and has all of the materials that are being requested. Communications Coordinator Blackford stated the cost of the equipment, along with cables, Mounds View City Council August 28, 2006 Regular Meeting Page 19 programming, and installation is approximately $25,209. She stated it is recommended that $5,940.57 is derived from the City Hall Rehabilitation Project, $12,260.28 is derived from the 2006 Cable Equipment account, $1788.89 is derived from the Cable Supplies/Equipment account and the remaining $5,219.26 is derived from the Cable TV balance. She stated Staff is requesting that the 2006 Cable Equipment account be increased by $6,000 to cover the cost of the remaining expense. Councilmember Thomas asked if a standard television in a smaller size could fit in the original place discussed. Communications Coordinator Blackford replied that a 27 inch television would not fit. Councilmember Flaherty asked if the City could run an extension cord through the dropped ceiling. Kimberly Backford stated it could not be run from the ceiling due to fire code issues. Councilmember Flaherty asked the cost of running a cord from the wall. Communications Coordinator Blackford replied that installation would cost $200 and part of the request. Councilmember Gunn stated that it will be difficult to watch if it is hung and not in the original place. Mayor Marty stated that overflow groups could watch the meeting and listen to the monitor. Councilmember Gunn stated that there have been complaints about people not being able to hear or see. She stated that she supports aflat-screen monitor in the original placement rather than the regular television hung in the corner. Mayor Marty stated that from what he recalled, the flat screen was $1300 and the regular TV is under $500 with the $200 added for installation, which is a large savings. Communications Coordinator Blackford stated that the next smaller size flat-screen was 20-inches. Councilmember Stigney stated there are 27-inch flat screen televisions available. Finance Director Beer stated the City could probably find aflat-screen TV under $1000. He suggested the Council remove the television from the price quote and find aflat-screen TV under $1000. Mayor Marty stated he believes the items should come out of the cable funding and not the City Rehabilitation Project funding, with the exception of the presentation table. Councilmember Thomas agreed. Mayor Marty also asked about purchasing a smaller television. Mayor Marry asked about the rebroadcasts of the meetings. He stated that the video quality was very poor and asked if any of the new equipment will fix the quality. Communications Coordinator Blackford stated there is a problem with the focus of one of the video cameras. Mayor Marty stated that overall the quality was not good. Communications Coordinator Blackford asked if he had noticed a drop in the quality. Mayor Marry replied that the quality is the same, but that the quality for New Brighton's meetings was much improved. Communications Coordinator Blackford stated her guess is that the cameras were higher quality. Councilmember Gunn asked if the presentation table and television would be removed from the Mounds View City Council August 28, 2006 Regular Meeting Page 20 proposal and discussed further in a work session. Mayor Marty suggested the presentation table be included in the City Hall rehabilitation project and not be removed from the resolution. Councilmember Stigney asked about the podium that is included and that he would like a better description about where the podium is coming from and what it is. He suggested that City residents be allowed to bid for such items. He asked where the power will come from for the power outlet in the new podium. Communications Coordinator Blackford replied a cord would be run to the existing outlet. He also mentioned that there is sales tax on labor included in the bid and he does not believe labor should be taxed. Finance Director Beer stated that some labor is taxed. Councilmember Stigney asked Communications Coordinator Blackford to look into the item. Councilmember Stigney also asked about the audio amplifier to drive two speakers. He questioned the need fora 100-watt amplifier. He also asked about $8,411 expense for installation. Communications Coordinator Blackford stated that she originally requested two controllers so either person, at the presentation table or in the back, could have control over the video cameras. Councilmember Thomas noted that there is still a quote in the proposal for the installation of the presentation table. Councilmember Stigney stated there are several places where expenses could be cut and that he does not support the resolution. He also noted his support for Alpha Video, but added that the installation and labor is excessive. Councilmember Stigney stated he thinks that all of the expenses should come out of the cable fund. He asked about the projection for future expenditures. Communications Coordinator Blackford replied that she had originally planned to request the non-linear editing system, but that request will not be made in 2007. Councilmember Stigney stated he believes half of the expenses could be cut. Councilmember Thomas stated that Alpha is the only place that can install everything the City needs at once. She stated the City is in a bind because they need to have this equipment installed. She stated she is troubled by the installation costs, particularly of the podium. Councilmember Gunn suggested discussing the issue at the work session. MOTION/SECOND: FLAHERTY/GUNK. To waive the reading and adopt Resolution 6927 Approving Authorization to Purchase Cable Equipment, removing cables and materials for the installation of the presentation table for $984, cables and materials for installation of the hallway television for $134, installation and labor for the presentation table for $1023, installation and Mounds View City Council August 28, 2006 Regular Meeting Page 21 labor for the television in hallway for $293, presentation table with podium and mic for $2303, the 32" JVC television for $495, the Jumbo Ceiling TV Mount for $146, the estimated cost to pay the electrician to rewire the power supply for $200, adjusting the sales tax accordingly, and that all items come out of the Cable funds. Councilmember Stigney suggested amending the motion to remove the Stuart amplifiers and investigate a cheaper alternative with less Amps. Councilmember Thomas asked Blackford to ask for another bid. Councilmember Stigney asked about the $5,353 labor expense for installing the remote access Creston table. Communications Coordinator Blackford stated that in the future another controller could be added so there are controllers in the Council chambers as well as in the back. She stated that the City could grow with the single controller. Councilmember Flaherty stated that City business is conducted in the Chambers. He stated the Cable Crew's job is to zoom in on things, not the City Staffs job. Ayes - 4 Nays - 1 (Stigney) Motion carried. L. Resolution 6930 Authorizing the Preliminary Design of Landscape Architecture Elements for the County Road 10 Trailway Corridor Director Lee stated that earlier this evening, the Council approved the trailway project. He stated Staff, along with Consultants, suggests doing this along the entire corridor. He stated Staff would like consistency along the corridor regarding landscaping. He stated the recommendation is to go forward with this part of the trailway program. Director Lee stated the cost is $15,000 to perform the preliminary landscape design. He explained $3500 would be attributed to the trailway segments nine and 10, and $5,500 for segments one through five. He stated the remaining preliminary landscaping design work for segments six through eight and segment 11 would be credited back at the time those projects are under design. Director Lee stated if the City approves this, the next steps are listed in the Staff report. He noted that on September 20, the Design Theme Subcommittee will meet for the second time, on October 2, the committee will meet again, and on October 9, the Council will have the preliminary design for approval. MOTION/SECOND: GLTNN/THOMAS. To waive the reading and adopt Resolution 6930 Authorizing the Preliminary Design of Landscape Architecture Elements for the County Road 10 Trailway Corridor, as amended. Councilmember Thomas stated that there need to be snow removal discussions as well. Mounds View City Council August 28, 2006 Regular Meeting Page 22 • Finance Director Beer stated that presently, it is budgeted for the EDA fund and that he suggests using TIF from district one for funding. Councilmember Flaherty suggested the resolution be amended as such. Mayor Marty asked about whom the subcommittee is made up of. Director Lee noted who was on the committee. Mayor Marry asked to add Rick Wriskey as a prime consultant. Ayes - 5 Nays - 0 Motion carried. M. Resolution 6931 Approving Change Order No. 35 for the City Hall Rehabilitation Project Director Lee noted that Change Order #5 was presented on June 26, and at that time the estimated cost was $17,612, and the total now has gone down to $11,331. Councilmember Stigney asked what the final estimate is for the City Hall. Lee stated that this was included in the report and the actual cost of the change orders went down from what was approved on June 26th, but the total went up because of the approval of the furniture at the last meeting. Director Lee stated the total for the rehab project was $1,543,194. Councilmember Flaherty asked if this is the last change order. Director Lee stated there are four items left. Councilmember Stigney asked if the automated door opener is included. Director Lee responded that it was included in the estimate. MOTION/SECOND: THOMAS/FLAHERTY. To waive the reading and adopt Resolution 6931 Approving Change Order No. 35 for the City Hall Rehabilitation Project. Mayor Many asked about the addition of building address. He asked what happened to the old address. Councilmember Thomas and Councilmember Gunn stated there were not numbers on the hall previously. City Administrator Ulrich stated there were letters before the atrium was added, but they have been gone for a while. Mayor Marry asked about fixing the wall in the interview room. Director Lee stated the expense was for fixing the wall and adding carpet in the interview room at the police department. Councilmember Flaherty clarified that it was to cut the echo out of the room during interviews. Councilmember Stigney asked about ASI57 and if there is currently lettering. Director Lee stated it is inside the building. Councilmember Stigney asked if none of the cost is for the outside lettering. Director Lee stated the City is still working with the consultant on that and the City will not be paying for the letters outside. Mounds View City Council August 28, 2006 Regular Meeting Page 23 Ayes - 5 Nays - 0 Motion carried. CONTINUATION OF MEETING 10:00 p.m. MOTION/SECOND: GLJNN/FLAHERTY. To continue the meeting until 10:30 p.m. Ayes - 5 Nays - 0 Motion carried. 8. CONSENT AGENDA Mayor Many asked to remove Item B. A. Licenses for Approval D 1 t' ~~')~ Z, t 1.1' 1,' N.. p~..lr' 7 C.. .~ T ..Lo D.....i a p r m„a C. Resolution 6920 Approving a Contract Award for the Repair Drainage Area Within Lambert Park MOTION/SECOND: THOMAS/GIJNN. To Approve the Consent Agenda as amended. Ayes - 5 Nays - 0 Motion carried. B. Resolution 6926 Establishing a No Parking Zone on Spring Lake Road Mayor Marry stated that the Staff report said the east side of the road was being damaged and the resolution states that the west side of the road will not allow parking. Director Lee stated that the west side was being damaged and the resolution is correct. MOTION/SECOND: MARTY/STIGNEY. To waive the reading and adopt Resolution 6926 Establishing a No Parking Zone on Spring Lake Road. Ayes - 5 Nays - 0 Motion carried. • 9. JUST AND CORRECT CLAIMS Councilmember Flaherty asked about the check to Hawkins, Inc for $2691 for chemicals. Director Lee stated it is for mainly Chlorine, but also includes other chemicals for water treatment coming out of the water treatment fund. Councilmember Thomas asked about the payment to the Met Council and if it was for the whole year. Finance Director Beer replied that it was for one month and added the payment would drop another $188 a month. MOTION/SECOND: FLAHERTY/GUNN. To approve the Just and Correct Claims as presented. Mounds View City Council August 28, 2006 Regular Meeting Page 24 i Ayes - 5 Nays - 0 Motion carried. 10. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. August 14, 2006 Executive Session Meeting Minutes MOTION/SECOND: THOMAS/STIGNEY. To Approve the August 14, 2006 City Council meeting minutes as corrected. Ayes - 5 Nays - 0 Motion carried. 11. REPORTS A. Reports of Mayor and Council Councilmember Flaherty asked the status of the street program. Director Lee replied that a notice was sent out to residents in the project area explaining the next steps. He stated that the consultant is currently putting together a feasibility report for the 2007-2008 construction projects. He stated the feasibility report would be presented in October and discussed in November. He stated it is scheduled for a public hearing on December 11th. . Councilmember Flaherty stated he would like residents to know that the issue is front and center on the Council's agenda. Councilmember Gunn reported that the Festival in the Park was held on a beautiful day and many residents attended. She thanked Teresa Sermack, Kathy Schwalbe, and Diane Warren, who were the only three people who helped her run the festival. She thanked Saturn of Mounds View for sponsoring the band for the evening, Medtronic for sponsoring the fireworks, Public Works for their support, and Bethlehem Baptist for games and a donation. She also thanked the Church Upon the Rock and the Irondale Danceline for games, the Fire department for bringing the safety house, US Army for the rock wall, Irondale Marching Band for leading the parade and Jackie Entsminger for being the grand marshal. She also thanked the Police Department for keeping things in line and ensuring safety. Councilmember Gunn stated the City needs volunteers for several committees for the Festival and asked citizens to step forward. Councilmember Flaherty stated he would like the item addressed during a work session regarding what the City can do to further support the Festival in the Park. B. Reports of Staff City Administrator Ulrich mentioned that the Mounds View Matters should have been delivered last Friday and Saturday. He asked that citizens let the City know if they have received their paper. Mounds View City Council August 28, 2006 Regular Meeting Page ZS 1. Community Development Quarterly Report Director Ericson reported that it has been a busy quarter for the City. He noted the Medtronic project and stated it is a dominating feature in Mounds View. Director Ericson noted that in terms of expenditures, the department is currently at 52%, which is less than what would be expected at this point some of which can be explained by personnel vacancies. Director Ericson stated the department has almost expended the materials and supplies budget. He explained that a couple of items that were purchased were the moisture meter and infrared thermometer. He noted the tools are used on a daily basis. Director Ericson stated some planning activity has already exceeded the anticipated revenues since the city has been quite busy with planning cases. He stated in addition to the planning cases, there have been many code amendments as well. Keeping staff and the Planning Commission busy. Director Ericson noted a new full-time temporary building inspector was hired during this period. Director Ericson also noted that there are several projects underway, including asix-unit subdivision on Woodale and the Dave Regal project in Hidden Hollow - a handicapped- accessible home. He explained the City is still waiting for a preliminary site plan for Integra Homes on County Road 10, and that the Red Oak Estates townhome project has begun. Director Ericson noted the Medtronic commercial and industrial project and that the total permit value of the work is up to $142,994,000. He noted that the final assessed value of the project could very well exceed the original estimations. He stated the City has received $1.5 million already in permit fees and the City has retained $800,000 so far. Director Ericson also noted Mounds View Square and the project to renovate the facility. He stated the renovation will be done as soon as possible. He added that there will be a grocery store planned for the complex and that it is a very encouraging project. Director Ericson also noted that up for discussion are plans for the Premium Stop property. Director Ericson stated that in conclusion, revenues are up, expenditures are down, and it is an exciting time for the City of Mounds View. Councilmember Stigney asked about the second unenclosed dumpster at Snyder's. Director Ericson stated it has been removed. Councilmember Flaherty asked if the complex across the street from Mounds View Square will take note of redesign and follow with their own redesign. Director Ericson stated he hopes so. Mounds View City Council August 28, 2006 Regular Meeting Page 26 C CONTINUATION OF MEETING 10:30 P.M. MOTION/SECOND: THOMAS/MARTY. To continue the meeting until 10:40 p.m. Ayes - 5 Nays - 0 Motion carried. C. Reports of City Attorney City Attorney Riggs stated that the final version of the lease for Sign #7 at the SYSCO site is ready. He stated he is looking for a motion to authorize the Mayor and City Administrator to execute. MOTION/SECOND: MARTY/THOMAS. To authorize the Mayor and City Administrator to execute the final version of the lease for Sign Number Seven at the SYSCO site. Ayes - 5 12. Next Council Work Session: Next Council Meeting: 13. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 10:44 p.m. Transcribed by: Lauren McKay Timesaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. Nays - 0 Motion carried. Tuesday, September 5, 2006, at 7 p.m. Monday, September 11, 2006, at 7 p.m. •