HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packets - 1982/07/19'" s�
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA SESSION
Julv 19, 1994
7:00 p.m.
1. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding Reorganization
Transitiun of Building Inspection Department
2. Consideration of Resolution No. 1449 Revising Permit Fees
Established by Resolution No. 749
3. Consideration of 1983 Civil Defense Grant Application
4. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding Injury on Duty
Pay to Chris Weston
5. Consideration of Modification to Joint Powers Agreement with
the City of Circle Pines
6. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding Fairchild Avenue
x Vacation
7. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding Final Adoption
of Comprehensive Plan
8. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding Oak Lake Pond
Size and Modifications
1
MEMO TO: Mayor and City Counci
c'ROM: Clerk-Administrato
DATE: July 13, 1982
SUBJECT: 1983 CIVIL DEFENSF GRANT APPLICATION
Attached please find copies of forms prepared by staff applying
for funding for our 1983 Civil Defense Budget and outlining our
proposed 1983 program activities.
Staff would ask that Council review the proposed application forms
and, if acceptable, authorize the Mayor to sign such forms at your
July 26th Regular Meeting.
DFP/pf
Attachments
STA,E OF IMFr.;50T1
D,2MTii14T OF FJDLIC W.FM
_ DIVISIOR OF ';i1MZICY STI IC?.S
�TYIu OR PRINt DJ IDT' B-5 Stato ca;+:iol TTORT.UaT: 10TIFY THIS
St. Paul, llnrosota 55155 rfIC3 0F�Utt
APPLICATION FOR 'LNQq—L HCY UU11(U_u_l1' �ASSIS+l'.'uaCL
1. Name of Civil Defense Agency: Sity of Mounds View 2, Address: 2401 Hwy. 10, Mounds Vt&sota 55112
S. Political subdivisions settved by this agencye Ci_y of,Mounds _View�-
4. Has Loyalty Cath been administered to Civil Defense Director? X+ Yes No.
F1J4°+: The Walty Gath is required from all personnel beforo enterin'u on duty. In accordance with 141nneeota Law,
all people serving in a Civil Defense capacity are required to ta:x the loyalty Oath, regardless of whether
or not they an being reimbursed from &mergency Ihnagownt Assistance Funds,
5. Has Compliance to Civil Rights been filed (D)CPA Form 056)? . al X Yes Dto
6. Has Civil Defense Director satisfactorily continued his professiondevelopment? ,X Yes --No
No
Is the Basic &argency Flan completed, approved, and up to date? R, Yes __ No
BeS. Regional Director Date — �-
0. life agree to abide by State Travel Regulations X Yes No. If no, attach 3 copies of Regulations governing your travel
9. Ile agree to abide by Cir,1-3 on Travel and A11 Other'%D Yes ,_ No, If no, attach justification for exceeding 5%
Travel and 32;b All Other.
10- Canary population! r12,979 (Year 1989 Lsti.msted current population: 12,593 �9
Tl. Based on 40 hours per weok, give percent of time you are employed with Civil Defense 50 .,
12. 7rnn• m of vem w,!imram.- _�------- FuDEU SHAR3 FOR FISCAL WR 19
,LULL MICE I ! )v Ur P yr
Tri•EC Ila TOTAL Fi1tSONFIe`7____f TOTAL TIi�P~3 TOTAL_ OTHER I TOTAL TOTAL
! 1 0 j 1 ;' 3,179.50 97 15 _ .5 67.50 ; 2.5 3,262
lfo are atraro of the flood insurance purchase requirements of tho Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973 (PL 93 234 arur. the
Federal Insurance Administration Rnjulationa.
If,' certify that thn rennestad funds are true and just and reflect onky tho Federal share. lie further certify that
local -.funds will be availablo in the amount of o 17,736 to match this request.
Signed by: Date: _ _ _S> ned by: Date:
ihyor or Cl+��*� of Bocrci� _((Tv-d Defenso Director)
MP5-dTS AD-6 zs7 Rov. it-5-31 APP JDIX - 1
Ilt APPLICANTS ONIJ
Each of the following items should be road carefully as they are State and Federal requirements and must be attested
tot
A. IUM SYSTER ACCEPTANCE: The standards for a lbrit System of Personnel and Administration outlined in the
CFG 1-3, are hereby accepted. Those standards an administered by the State Civil Defense bhrit System, those
address is the Centennial Bldg.] St. Paul, Yinn. 55155- (If your agency is located in Hennepin County, you
may choose to accept the standards sot forth by the Hennepin County Personnel Dept. If your agency is located
in St. Louis County, your clerical staff may be covered by the St.. Louis County Civil Service Dept.) Your
professional staff will still be required to be under the hfinrosota Civil 1�1-iensu inrit System.
B. TRAVEL REGULATIONS: Ile accept the State of Minnesota Travel Regulations. (If you choose your oim Travel Regu-
lationsn the following items are to be submitted in quintuplicate (5): Statute Establishing Travel, Rules and
Regulations.)
G. UNDERSTANDING OF ACOOUNTIM AND RECORD IESPING: Uo agree to keep books and records of monies received and ex-
pended; that accepted accounting methods and practices will be used; and that those records will be made
available to representatives of the Director of the Federal Emergency 24anagement Agency) the U.S. Comptroller
Cenoral, the General Accounting Office, the ILnnesota Division of Emergency Services, and the office of the
If9nnesota Legislative Auditor during regular worldng hours.
D. STATEMENT OF COMMUNE: Ho agree to comply with requirements proscribed by Milk and tho State of Ifume-
ehta as a condition of eligibility for approving Dwrgoncy Yenagement Assistance under P.L. 85-606; and
understand that failure to comply may cause ineligibility for or discontinuanco of this assistance and other
programs of the Federal Emergency ihnagoment Agency.
46 certify to the above Ibrit Srjstom and Travel Regulationst and we further certify that we have read the foregoing re-
quiremonts and accept them as stated.
Signed: ,.
Signed.�gyor or Chairroan��—�Titl� _ hate) V (County Miumi.cipal Treas. Title Date)
Signed: ' _____ Signed:.._ __ _ "..�
City County Attorz YT Titlo —y Dato) (EGY7&ounty C.D. 9(Title(Date)
FrDERM. rmnPrr--, M1'Amu r- •
1.001 LiiK:r9rrncy Vac--•,-.w,nL Aunw., 11,111(:r
PART 1. JURISDICTIONAL INFORMATION
1-1 Agency CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW 1-2 Address 2401 HIGHWAY 10
ty MOUNDS VIEW 1-4 State MINNESOTA 1.5 Zip 55112
2-1 As of Date 2-2 Submission Date 7-15-82 2-3 State Area
3-1 Clearly Define Jurisdiction(s) Being Reported On:
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
4 DIRECTOR (NMO ERNEST F. GRABOWSKI
CURRENT ANNUAL FUNDING REQUESTED AND PORJECTED (to nearest dollar)
FECERAL FUNDS A. FY 83 g. Fy 84 C. FY 85
5-1 EMA
5-2 MIS
5-3 SM.
5-4 EOC
(For Local funds list only monies NOT matched by Federal funds)
5-5 Local Funds $ 17,736 $14,000 $ 14,000
6 Ability To Execute Emergency Plans
C-1 Nuclear War 6-2 - Peacetime Nuclear 6-3 f1 Other Peacetime
D❑ Operations �� 0 Incidents lJ Disasters
TEN (Table Entry No.) _ CODE (FEMA Use Only) CONGL (Risk (lost No.)
1-1 1980 Population 12,479 7-2 Est. Current Population 12,593
7-3 Est. Pop. Covered by Outdoor Warning 3,778
•I1OTL•NTIAL HAZARDS FACING, JI'RISDICTION ,
6i 8-1 Dir. Eff. Risk Cxl 3-6 Winter Storm
8-2 Fallout, Risk Q 8-7 Flood/Flask Flood
L 8-3 Nuclear Incident Iixxll 8-8 Earthquake
0 C-0, Tornado ® 8-9 Trans. Accident
L 8-5 Hurricane 0 8-A Industrial Accident
8-D In Last FY 8-C In Last FY
No. of Disaster Alerts 1-01 Occurrences
8-0 Other (Specify)
P.EG,ULAR EM PERSONNEL HOURS PER WEEK
(including Director) 2 4 8 20 30 40
9-1 E14A Paid 1
9• 1ther Paid
9• Iolunteer —
9-5 Director Hours per Week: Paid 20 Vol. 0
Ah
FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY
srAFFING PATTERN
_ (Personnel and Administrative Experim Program)
FISCAL YEAR
1983
NO.
1
NAME OF ORGANIZATION`
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
__
(STATE
I MINNESOTA
DATE
NO.OFPAGES
1
POSITION
Il)
Police Chief
CROSS
ANNUAL
CO
SALARY
(y)
0,431
SALARY RANGE
la)
MATCHING
FUNDS
REQUESTED
ly)
)BE
FULL7,PPOINTMENT
TIMEDATE
(5)1])
-
50%
5/1960
TYPE
APPOINTMENT
(g)
Permanent
ESTIMATED DATE
YACANCYTO
FILLED
(9)
-
R7INIMUM
24,182
MAXIMUM
35,738
'/ES ND
X
I
i
I
i
tIOj TOTAL fALARE NY REQUESTED COST FOR WHIC
ARE FUNDS REH MATCHINO ((])ESTIMATED
s 20,431
COST OF PERSONNEL BENEFITS
15.Sx x3,179.50
(12) TOTAL SALARIES AND PERSONNEL BENEFITS
FOR WHICH MATCHING FUNDS ARE REQUESTED
x 20,431
•Name of organiretior .hdvm on the program paper and other Personnel and Administrative ezpeme documents.
FEMA Form e5•17 (6/6 113I1fN OCPA Form 751 (9/72) WhICh WIII not be used,
PROGRAM ACTIVITY FY 1983
A. HAZARD MITIGATION
1. Implement local ordinances dealing with Wetlands, Surface
Water, and Flood Plain Management.
2. Review local hazards which could affect the residents of
the community.
3. Brief all City personnel (elected and appointed) on emer-
gency procedures.
B. EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS
1. Distribute information to the public on natural disasters
and nuclear preparation including an annual campaign on
Tornado Awareness/Preparedness.
2. Participate in Public Official Conferences.
C. EMERGENCY RESPONSE
1. Participate in the monthly testing of warning systems.
D. RECOVERY OPERATIONS
1. Coordinate activities during an emergency.
2. Brief public officials on emergency response and
recovery activities.
3. Assist disaster victims in locating shelter, food, and
clothing.
E. PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION
1. Submit required reports to the County and State.
2. Evaluate program performance on a quarterly basis and
submit quarterly reports.
The undersigned agree to exert their best efforts to carry out activities
described.
Director
Program Paper (is) (is not) approved
Date
State
Ch''e Executive
Program Paper (is) (is not) approved
FEMA Region V
Date
MOUNDS VIEW, MINNESOTA
FUNCTIONAL STATEMENT
DUTIES
Civil Defense Director:
Develops a Civil Defense Disaster Plan for the City
and files completed plans with the appropriate
county and state agencies.
Departmental Secretary:
Performs all of the clerical duties related to the
Civil Defense program.
e
o
J
MOUNDS VIEW, MINNESOTA
CIVIL DEFENSE
ORGANIZATIONAL CHART
Civil Defense Director
Departmental Secretary
MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council
)
FROM: Clerk -Administrator
DATE: July 14, 1982
SUBJECT: INJURY ON DUTY PAY TO CHRIS WESTON
As you may recall, Chris Weston was absent from work from March 25
to April 18, 1982 due to a disability which he claimed resulted
from an injury he incurred while on duty with the City of Mounds
View. The Injury on Duty clause in our Labor Agreement with
IUOE Local No. 49 states, "The injury on duty will be 60 days, with
the first three days to come out of sick leave, and then 60 days
injury on duty. Any days beyond the 60 days will be taken from the
employee's banked sick leave." As it is a common understanding
between the union and all cities in the M.A.M.A. group that injury
on duty benefits will not be paid until it has been determined that
Worker's Compensation benefits are payable, thus, legitimizing the
claim that the injury was incurred while on duty, staff advised
Mr. Weston that injury on duty benefits would not be paid until
such a determination was made by our Worker's Compensation insurance
carrier and that the disability exceeded the three day waiting period.
On April 22, 1982 Western Insurance Companies, the City's Worker's
Compensation insurance carrier, paid Mr. Weston benefits for the
period cited above and on that same date the City of Mounds View
submitted to Mr. Weston a check from the City reflecting the injury
on duty benefits due to him pursuant to the provisions of the Labor
Agreement.
On June 21, 1982 this office received correspondence from Mr. Kirk
Newton of Western Insurance indicating that Mr. Weston's claim,which
they had previously paid,was now being denied as it was their
determination that the disability did not result from a work related
injury. In telephone conversations with Mr. Newton, it was revealed
that the benefits were originally paid due to the State requirements
that benefits be pnid within 14 days of notice of injury which normally
does not allow for sufficient opportunity to investigate a claim.
Upon completion of their investigation, it was the determination of
Western Insurance that the disability did not result from a work
related injury and that not only were benefits not payable but that
Mr. Weston would be responsible for repaying those benefits previously
paid in error.
Based on this information staff contacted Mr. Cy Smythe of Labor
Relations Associates, the City's labor relations consultant, in a
letter dated June 25, 1982, copy attached, requestinq quidance with
respect to the City's position regarding the injury on duty benefits
-2-
paid as a result of the Western Insurance Company's payment for
disability benefits which was later determined to be in error.
Mr. Smythe, in a letter dated July 7, 1982, copy attached, indicates
that it is his recommendation that the City should deny the injury
on duty payments and recover such payments from the employee's sick
leave bank or accumulated vacation:
Staff is aware that Mr. Weston is presently appealing the determina-
tion of Western Insurance Companies regarding their denial of his
claim, however, we feel that Mr. Weston should be further advised
of the City's position in this matter regarding the payment of
injury on duty benefits. For this reason, staff would request
Council direction in this matter regarding your desire to either
require the repayment of these benefits based upon the determination
of West,= Insurance Companies that the disability did not result
from an injury incurred on duty or to allow for Mr. Weston to retain
these payments which would establish a somewhat dangerous precedent
for all future injury on duty claims, especially those which might
be false claims.
Staff would appreciate Council direction in this matter.
DFP/pf
Attachments
l
Cif oout s 4
NAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESC7A
2401 HIGHWAY 10
MOUNDS VIEW, MINN. 55112
78a0055
June 25, 1982
Mr. Cy Smythe
Labor Relations Associates
7501 Golden Valley Rd.
2nd Floor
Golden Valley, MN 55427
Dear Cy:
Mr. Chris Weston, a member of our Public Works Department and the
49ers, recently filed for worker's Compensation coverage for a
period of disability allegedly resulting from an injury incurred
while on duty.
The claim was forwarded to our insurance company, Western Insurance
Companies, for an evaluation of the claim and determination relative
to the payment of worker's compensation benefits. My office advised
Mr. Weston at that time that Injury on Duty benefits would be paid
by the City if it was determined by Western Insurance that it was a
valid claim, worker's compensation benefits were paid, and the period
of disability exceeded 3 days, copy of letter attached.
On April 22, 1982, Western Companies paid Mr. Weston benefits for a
period from March 25, 1982, through April 18, 1982, copy of notice
attached. On that same date, this office submitted to Mr. Weston
his second Worker's Compensation benefit check along with a check
from the City reflecting Injury on Duty benefits pursuant to our
labor agreement with AFL-CIO Local No. 49.
On June 21, 1982, this office received correspondence from Mr. Kirk
Newton of Western Insurance indi,:ating that Mr. Weston's claim,
which they had previously paid, was now being denied as it was their
determination that the disability did not result from a work related
injury. Also enclosed with this correspondence, copies attached,
was a letter from Mr. Newton to Mr. Weston requesting repayment of
the erroneously paid disability benefits. A telephone conversation
with Mr. Newton revealed that benefits were originally paid due to
the State requirement that benefits be paid within 14 days of notice
of injury, which did not allow sufficient opportunity to investigate
the claim. Upon completion of their investigation of ,the claim, it
was Western Insurance's determination that the disability did not
result from a work related injury.
Mr. Smythe
Page Two
June 25, 1502 '
All of this leads us to the question now facing the City of Mounds
View, and that is: Do we attempt to recover the Injury on Duty
benefits we have paid based on Western's actions and, if so, how
do we go about doing so? Any advice or information you might be
able to provide in this matter will be greatly appreciated. We
recognize this as being a sensitive i•$sue, especially during con-
tract negotiations, and we wish to handle it in an appropriate
manner.
Your prompt attention and response will he grently appreciated.
4Sine ly, /
Dona aule
Clerk -Administrator
CP/pb
Attachments
cc: Donald Brager, Finance Director .'
John Johnson, Public Works/Community Development Director
I
W
LABOR RELATIONS ASSOCIATES, INC.
7501 Golden Valley Road
Golden Valley, Minnesota 55427
612/546 1470
July 7, 1962
Mr. Donald Pauley
City Clerk -Administrator
City of Mounds View
2401 Highway #10
Mounds View, Minnesota 55112
Dear Don:
You requested in your June 25, 1982 letter that I advise you of the
appropriate method of dealing with the Chris Weston Injury On Duty -Workers'
Compensation payment issue.
Your labor agreement with I.U.O.E., Local No. 49 in its LOCAL ADDENDUM
entitled "RESOLUTION NO. 1144" in Item No. 3 staees:
"The injury on duty will be sixty (60) days with the
first three (3) to come out of sick leave and then sixty
(60) days injury on duty. Any days beyond the sixty (60)
will then be taken from the employee's banked sick leave."
While your Item No. 3 does not specifically state that Injury On Duty pay
from the City is contingent on eligibility for Workers' Compensation
benefits (which should be taken care of in 1983) the common understanding
is that such eligibility is a requirement.
The City did make Injury On Duty payments based on an initial determination
of eligibility for Workers' Compensation. This eligibility was later
denied and the City should therefore deny City Injury On Duty payments
and recover such payments from the employee's sick leave bank or
accumulated vacation account.
If I can be of further assistance please let me know.
Smy
CFS:hfc
MEMO TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Clerk -Administrator
DATE: July 14, 1982
SUBJECT: JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF CIRCLE PINES
Pursuant to Council direction at the July 12th meeting, staff has
revised the attached Joint Powers Agreement to provide for a
limitation on the time of the Engineering/Planning Technician in
view of the City of Circle Pines desire to limit expenditures to
$1,000 without prior approval.
Please note the Time Allocation section on Page 2 which in the
second paragraph states, "The total time to be expended by the
Engineering/Planning Technician for completion of the Trails System
Mastcr Plan shall not exceed 85 hours without the prior written
approval of the Council of the City of Circle Pines." It is felt
that this provision would provide sufficient protection for the
City of Mounds View in that an expenditure of 85 hours of staff
time would not cause for the City's total cost to exceed the
$1,000 limitation and would provide for the City of Circle Pines
to approve additional expenditures of staff time and money.
Should you find this modification acceptable, staff would request
your approval for the Mayor and Clerk -Administrator to enter into
this contract with the City of Circle Pines.
DFP/pf
Attachment
JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT BETWEEN
THE CITIES OF CIRCLE PINES AND
MOUNDS VIEW
Purpose
WHEREAS, it is the desire of ,the City of Circle Pines
to prepare a Trails System Master Plan requiring the ser-
vices of a landscape architect; and
WHEREAS, the City of Mounds View has a staff member,
Engineering/Planning Technician, who has a landscape archi-
tect degree from the University of Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, the City of Mounds View submitted a proposal,
Attachments A, B, and C, to the City of Circle Pines whereby
said staff member would provide the design and planning ser-
vices for a Trails System Master Plan; and
WHEREAS, the City of Circle Pines has indicated that it
is their desire to have said Mounds View staff member prepare
a Trails System Master Plan; and
WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Cities of Circle Pines
and Mounds View to enter into a Joint Power Agreement estab-
lishing the conditions for the preparation of a Trails System
Master Plan.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, it is agreed between the
Parties as follows:
Employing Municipality
The City of Mounds View hereby agrees to be the employing
municipality for the joint powers agreement. The City of
Mounds View shall be accountable for the receipt of that
portion of the labor costs paid by the City of Circle Pines.
No property shall be acquired as a result of this agreement.
Staff Responsibilities and Accountability
The responsibilities of staff in the preparation of a Trails
System Master Plan are outlined in Attachment B, Design Pro-
cess. The staff shall be responsible to ''-he Parks Director
of the City of Circls. Pines for all work related to the prep-
aration of the Trails System Master Plan and to the City of
Mounds View Director of Public Works/Community Development
for all other duties related to his employment.
-1-
-2-
Time Allocation
The Engineering/Planning Technician's time will be allocated
at the weekly rate of two days performing work related to the
Trails System Master Plan either in Circle Pines or at the
Mounds View City Offices and three days performing duties
related to his Mounds View employment until the Plan is com-
plete.
The total time to be expended by the Engineering/Planning
Technician for completion of the Trails System Master Plan
shall not exceed 85 hours without the prior written approval
of the Council of the City of Circle Pines.
Allocation of Cost
The City of Mounds View shall invoice the City of Circle Pines
upon completion of the Plan based on the following:
1. Ten dollars per hour for each hour the Engineering/
Planning Technician works on the Plan.
2. Nineteen cents per mile for the use of a City of
Mounds View vehicle for travel related to the prep-
aration of the Plan.
3. Actual costs incurred by the City of Mounds View in
the printing of 15 copies of the Plan.
The amounts due under this agreement will not exceed $1,000
without the prior written approval of the Council of the City
of Circle Pines.
Administration and Clerical Support
The City of Mounds View will be responsible for all general
clerical and administrative work including Worker's Compen-
sation and insurance. The City of Circle Pines will be respon-
sible for the publication and mailing of official notices and
making available all information necessary for the prepara-
tion of the Plan.
Miscellaneous Expenses
All miscellaneous expenses including but not limited to post-
age, photocopying, and long-distance telephone charges will
be the responsibility of the City of Circle Pines.
Equipment Provided
The City of Mounds View hereby agrees to make available a
vehicle for transportation purposes and all needed printing
equipment for the printing of the Plan.
-3-
Indemnification
The City of Mounds View hereby agrees to indemnify and hold
harmless and defend the City of Circle Pines, its agents and
employees, against any and all claims for damages, of whatever
nature, arising from or in consequence of the duties it has
assumed hereunder, except for vehicles and/or equipment owned
by the City of Circle Pines.
Authority
Each party executes this agreement pursuant to the authority
of their respective governing bodies.
Duration and Term
This agreement shall remain in effect until the Plan is com-
plete, unless terminated by either party subject to thirty
(30) day written notice.
Agreement entered into this
1982.
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
Mayor
Clerk -Administrator
day of
CITY OF CIRCLE PINES
Mayor
City Administrator
1
I]
E14
MEMO TO: City Council
FROM: Director of Public Works/Community Development
DATE: July 15, 1982
SUBJECT: FAIRCRILD AVENUE VACATION
Attached for your review arc the following items concerning the
Fairchild Avenue vacation:
1) Concept sketch/cul-de-sac layout
2) City Council minutes of February 27, 1978 regarding
Gple Addition
3) Planning Report regarding Gale Addition
9) Sewer/water as -built sketch
5) Plat map
Please refer to the concept sketch drawing. Staff recommends
vacating the north 210 feet of the existing 30 foot easement
between Laport Drive and Ardan Avenue but also retain the west 10
feet as a drainage and utility easement with a walkway over this
10 foot area. The cul-de-sac would be provided to create access
to the rear of 8205 and 8227 Groveland Road. Connections to both
water and sanitary sewer mains could occur at Laport Drive and
Fairchild and is feasible.
The issue at the present time is the street right-of-way vacation.
Should the two lots choose to subdivide in the future, access to
these lots could be achieved via the proposed cul-de-sac.
/bc
•
AWAO
❑ I VAGA4T a I VACANT I VAUWT
I
Ilk
WOF
/,.
•.............• WATF-17NA l
•--- MAgRDLF-- f hewwmmk
NYORAMT
4�o
ll�
•
AVEME
VFA104
UfIUTY I
A49
EAhEME
(W4uc
Ay
f VCHU GU -K-/AG
hGALS l" - lod
T NORTH
r
.� J'ubruary 27, 1970 Page
0,'professional recommendation.
APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA
MSP (Ziebarth-Rowley) to 'approve the consent agenda as follows: 3
ITEM A. Receivn the Engineer's feasibility report on Project 1978-4,
sanitary sewer, water main and street construction for
Mounds View Industrial Park No. 2.
ITEM B. Receive the January, 1978, activity reports of the police,
le,al, fire, and nuisance abatement departments.
ITEM C. Approve the February 27, 1978, bills for payment.
ITEM D. Approve the following license:
MASONRY - expires 6/30/78
Barry Bjugstad - new
1182•Rockstone Court
New Brighton, MN 55112
ITEM E. Receive and accept Mayor Pic,:ar's recommendation for t1.:.
following appointments to citizen advisory commissions:
Park & Recreation Commission
Jerry Linke 2319 Knoll Drive
Gordon Yuluvar 7815 Gloria Circle
Lakeside Park Commission
thru 1978
thru 1900
isrb Store 2609 Noodale Drive thru 1979
Donna B•)wman 8046 Long Lake Road thru 1990
Acting Mayor Baumgartner closed the regular meeting and opened the
public hearing. '
on - PRELIMINARY PLAT OF FIVE HOMESITES
Ken Sjodin, a representative of the owner of the property presented
the plat of the proposed development and stated that there is presently
one home located on the property, which they would like to divide into
five lots. lie stated that Staff has recommended a 30' caseritenL for
the proposed extension of Fairchild Avenue. Mr. Sjodin added that
Official Rose had looked at the plat and approved it.
/1
r
FebJ;uaiy $7,
l/
0'."
1978
Page
Councilmember Rowley questioned if the owner of the property was
concerned with getting the most lots possible out of the subdivisio„ !
Mr. Sjodin replied that the owner wished to keep the plat as it
was, with five lots.
Administrator Achen recommended that the Council decide if Fairchild
Aves,ue should be extended to the south, to decide if the 30' easement
was required.
Acting Mayor Baumgartner asked if a petition had been presented for
the street. Administrator Achen replied that one had not been received,
and that it would require 35 percent of the property owners requesting
it before a public hearing would be set.
Mr. Werner stated that while he approved of the plat, he did not feel
the street would be asthetically pleasing.
Engineer Hubbard reported that if the street were put in, only two
lots could be assessed; which wo-Id -amount to innroximately a $14,000
assessment per lot for the street only, or about $33,000 total for
both lots for the street, sewer and water.
Mr. Sjodin stated that at approximately $16,500 per lot, the assess-
ments would exceed- the actual value of the property. He stated thal
lie would be willing to give the easement if it was necessary but t�
he would prefer not giving it if the street was not going to be pu.
Acting Mayor Baumgartner stated that the 30' easement on the east
tside of the property line would also have to be vacated if the street
was not put in.
Councilmember ziebarth asked if any easement would be required for a
walkway to the park. Engineer Hubbard replied that a 30' pagamont
MSP (Baumgartner -Rowley) to approve the subdivision request of Ray
Gale at 8227 Groveland Road as presented on the proposed plat
dated February 1978,
Acting Mayor Baumgartner closed the public hearing and reopened the
regular meeting.
2
1
Administrator AchEa reported that project 1978-1 provides storm se-.Z
trunk capacity for future development but until the Council acts on
�. the project, developers do not know whether they can handle drainage
needs by simply connecting to the 1978-1 system, and recommended that
all pending development proposals ;., which a development agreement
CASE: 40-77, Item 4 on Planning Commission Agenda, 12/14/77
ITEM: Major Subdivision (two lots into five)
APPLICANT: Ray Gale
LOCATION: 8227 Grovcland Road
Legal: The•N 1/2 of Lot 67 and the N 1/2 of the
S 1/2 of Lot 67, Auditors Subdivision No. 89
SUMMARY OF REQUEST
Applicant owns all of subject parcel, which measures 453.2' fronting
Arden Avenue and 243.5' fronting Groveland Road. Applicant
requests to subdivide the two lots,creating four which would
front Ardan Avenue (all 113.3' wids and 140.5' deep) and ore
lot fronting Groveland Road (103' wide and 453.2' deep).
PLANNING
1. Previous subdivision east of this parcel has provided 30'
easement for the extension of Fairchild Avenue, north of
LaPort Drive to Ardan Avenue. Applicant should be required
to dedicate the east 30' of Lot 67 for Fairchild Avenue.
Only one additional 115' x 30' strip easement from 8205
^ Groveland Road would be necessary for the required easements
for the extension of Fairchild Avenue.
2. No sewer or water services are available on Ardan Avenue
between Groveland Road and Fairchild Avenue. Applicant should
be required to petition for services, grant any additional
easement necessary and waive the right of public hearing if
he wishes to expedite matters or he can install the services
himself, under City requirements and inspection.
3. An additional lot could be created which would front on
proposed Fairchild Avenue. This would require the relocation
of the applicant's garage and oversized accessory building.
4. Construction of proposed Fairchild Avenue would also minimally
provide one additional lot from 8205 Groveland fronting
Fairchild.
5. Applicant's existing driveway is located on Lots 1, 2 and 3.
Drive will have to be relocated.
6. Applicant's plat request meets frontage and size requirements.
:n additional lot could be created.
7. See Sketch A, which creates one additional lot with a revision
of the applicant's original preliminary plat. This allows an
additional lot subdivision by the property owner to the south.
All lots conform to code requirements and allow the extension
of Fairchild. Services could be provided for the Fairchild
lot at the same time as the installation of the Ardan services.
Case 40-77
Page 2
8, See Sketch B, which maximizes the use of the applicants
property and the property adjacent to the south. Note
that one additional lot is created but that it takes a
combination of the neighbors properties, but provides better
distribution of assessment costs.
9. Development Agreement will be necessary for the development
and approval of the Plat.
10. Additional utility and drainage casements are necessary
generally along the south 5' of Lots 1-4 and the north 5'
of Lot 5 depending on the final plat.
11. Existing Fairchild easements should be vacated should the
extension of Fairchild south of. Ardan be disapproved.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Deny preliminary plat as proposed. Recommend the plat be revised
according to Sketch B with the joint platting of 8227 and 8205
Groveland to create nine lots. Staff feels that Fairchild Avenue
should be extended south at this point in time to maximize the land
use of this area and to equitably apportion the cost of the
improvement. It will be less expensive to do it now at today's
costs than at the predicted cost five to ten years from now.
Options
1. Recommend approval of Preliminary Plat as submitted (without
the extension of Fairchild south).
2. Recommend Preliminary Plat with revisions of granting a 30'
Fairchild road easement and the creation of a sixth lot
(Sketch A).
3. Recommend Preliminary Plat to be drawn up to allow the
future if not immediate platting according to Sketch B.
Note that Options 2 & 3 necessitate the extension of Fairchild
south of Ardan to LaPort Drive while Option 1 does not.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
MSP (Foss-Mackeben) to approve the major subdivision request for the
Ray Gale property at 8243 Groveland Road with the following changes
on the lot sizes, that lots 1,2 and 3 be 105.8' ' deep,
Lot 4 be 135.8' wide by 140.5' deep, on
the east boundry line and lot 5 be 1 deep,
WWWon the east lot line. The developer would be r
o a development agreement with the City prior to"
platting of the property, and the new preliminary plat would have to
meet with the approval of Staff before going on to the City Council.
Case 40-77 Page 3
STAFF RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL
Since the Planning Commission has reviewed this preliminary plat,
staff has been contacted by the home owner to the south
(8205 Groveland), who plans to subdivide his property in the
near future. With this in mind, Sketch B is more feasible in
content and makes the Fairchild extension more necessary. This
improvement will hopefully stimulate Sketch B's maximized use
of the property involved. Engineer Hubbard will present the
improvement costs for the various options.
Options:
1. Approve 5 lot preliminary plat revision as recommended
by the Planning Commission, with 30' road easement
taken for the extension of• Fairchild Avenue south from
Ardan Avenue.
2. Approve five lets as presented by applicant• without
30' road ca:-ement for Fairchild Avenue.
3. Table and se: additional hearing for public input
concerning the extension of Fairchild Avenue.
l �:�� �'vi?f •':,u.,r:.r.:' pit;
a-
MSP (Baumgartner -Rowley) to approve the subdivision request of
Ray Gale at 8227 Grovelan on the proposed plat
dated February 1978, 2 ayes
1 nay
SUMMARY OF REQUEST 6/14/78
City Council approved the major subdivision without the extension
of Fairchild Avenue south of Ardan Avenue. The applicant hereby
requests that he be granted five buildable Ints along Ardan Avenue,
rather than the four he was originally granted.
PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS
1. All lots meet minimum requirements as presented in the final
plat of six lots.
2. This drainage district in the City is experiencing drainage
problems due to the inadequate facilities in that area. The
City Engineer is presently working on the solution and
recommends that final approval not be granted until a temporary
or permanent improvement of the drainage system is made.
VOW
•
y,
0 100
ra.g.v.C.P, G•' 0.4
// � •°
/ 1725
c co
O_ 1 • �• 4
r,
-P gaos I ;.s •..• :.: .
ry> 6 cxr,•' ca,�c� �'
•2 �'.PLJV
Sag. 115
D dlb
U. 6•Q'E',50c AVENUE
FAIRCHILD
�� p•c<Eus'C��lts �■
4 s 1725
•Vd,6
I � �
81 3 J
�x
LV
�'
h � p'
t
' / y 4
o Grbveland
w p a _
I p .�
43.c. r �` �. Z q Sy,� of 09• o
bW �' • �4,.r 27L1 O 2741
).30 to —_. M_ ._. : + R _�- rU —• W
t :GA NE 2N
5AD
) 2 e nw Z7�G rYs t74y I n
C 4
O�u ) a �•;� t
bf I .._��a.• r CHURCH •'
P� 4
�It04G 5
j
la e I n:,r•
r
z7Tf S7ty r:, r
loo
•I .: yr<.,, I W 6 I ! J p
144 31 e LL 27eY Z7S .ma y 1,'t
Lu f 3 f% F i '0- I re .
r e4.t• a •'. o �� I• L90 I . l�',' lZO•/O
i• 1 �.
Q i rpp N .406` cso
LI72 td1Y�1�/G SIW /VO.09 55.a '• '
050
rSS '/ ZSTL-.::.,�•-.- zfw-: I I O 1 PLn i C of
5• .e.. _.
.4D n.c.GE I NSO4• rr,
45� .rxrr Red Oak
-1.70 w., �e+4. •ii x>< riot I /Ai'(.S I!/0' `ol i,o I OSG•lo e
I)o t5 o
qIu• r Om• Irf oe School
d. , I a I .0
-{ ,�N�r 4'i.o1i LIirI 65
"01 2: L$7 '�- I!n/ r?JS
t 194
0 C �• Y b
3 t 7 0 NV
O 0 C O C O
MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council
Planning Commission
FROM: Director of Public Works/Community Development
DATE: July 15, 1982
SUBJECT: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - FINAL ADOPTION
An inquiry came today from the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission
regarding the status of final approval of our Comprehensive Plan.
Specifically, Met Council wanted to know whether the City had
officially adopted the Comprehensive Plan following their review and,
if not, when it would be adopted. From Resolution No. 1265, I see
that the plan was submitted to Met Council for review on April 13,
1981. Met Council formally approved this plan on January 7, 1982.
Pursuant to the Metropolitan Land Planning Act, the City has nine
months in which to adopt the plan. October 7th would be our dead-
line for adoption. Does the Council wish to proceed with the formal
adoption of the Comprehensive Plan?
Please direct staff regarding this item.
JJ/pf
n
RESOLUTION NO. 1265
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
6+ RESOLUTION CERTIFYING PRE -REVIEW REQUIREMENTS OF THE METRO-
POLITAN LAND PLANNING ACT FOR SUBMISSION TO METROPOLITAN
COUNCIL
WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Land Planning Act requires local govern-
mental units to prepare comprehensive plans and submit them to the
Metropolitan Council for review; and
WHEREAS, this plan entitled, "Mounds View Comprehensive Plan"
represents the response to the City of Mounds View to the requirements
of the Metropolitan Land Planning Act; and
WHEREAS, this plan was adopted by the Mounds View Planning Commis-
sion on April 1, 1981, following a public hearing with required legal
notice; and
WHEREAS, this plan was sent to the City of Blaine, City of Spring
Lake Park, City of Fridley, City of New Brighton, Village of Arden Hills,
Village of Shoreview, Rice Creek Watershed District, School District #621
and Ramsey County Public Works for review and comment on September 11,
1980; and
WHEREAS, this plan was considered and accepted, but not adopted,
jy the CiLy of Mounds View on April 13, 1981; and
WHEREAS, a notice will be sent to the City of Blaine, City of
Spring Lake Park, City of Fridley, City of New Brighton, Village of Arden
Hills, Village of Shoreview, Rice Creek Watershed District, School Dis-
trict #621 and Ramsey County Public Works that the City of Mounds View is
submitting its plan to the Metropolitan Council for formal review under
the Metropolitan Land Planning Act;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Mounds View that the Mayor is authorized and directed to submit this plan
to the Chairman of the Metropolitan Council for review under Section
473.175 of the Metropolitan Land Planning Act.
Adopted this 13th day of April, 1981.
ATTTEST: 11''
1,01
Mayor
(SEAL)
Clerk -Administrator
A
.;i
MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. 12-81
6' C.TTY OF MOUNDS VII.W
COUNTY OF RAMSI'Y
�! STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING ADOPTION OF THE FINAL DRAFT OF
THE COMPREHENSIVI:PLAN TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE CITY
OF MOUNDS VIEW
WHEREAS, preparation of the Mounds View Comprehensive Plan has
been undertaken in compliance with the Metropolitan Land Planning act;
and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on July
23, 1980, to review the draft plan with the Mounds View public; and
WHEREAS, the City Clerk placed the legal public notice of the
public hearing in the official city newspaper on the adoption of a new
comprehensive plan; and
WHEREAS, the new Comprehensive Plan was submitted to adjacent
and affected communities and school districts; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has now completed a final draft
,of the Comprehensive Plan taking into account comments received from
Mounds View citizens and adjacent communities and districts;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning 1p
Commissicn adopts the final draft of the Comprehensive Plan Update and
recommends the .Mounds View City Council adopt the Plan after the Metro-
politan Council has reviewed and approved it;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission
recommends continued use of the Comprehensive Plan Update as an interium
plan during Metropolitan Council review.
Adopted this 1st day of April, 1981.
ATTEST:
Wgt� if
Chairpe v6n
(SEAL)
Building and Zoninj Official
Y
MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Director of. Public Works/Community Development
DATE: July 15, 1982
SUBJECT: OAK LAKE POND
Attached are copies of two letters, one from Kraus -Anderson to
Short -Elliott -Hendrickson and one from Short -Elliott -Hendrickson
to Kraus -Anderson concerning pond outlet structure.
This memo is a follow up to my memo for July 6, 1982 agenda
meeting, which is also attached. A subsequent telephone conver-
sation with Dan Boxrud indicates that Kraus -Anderson and Short -
Elliott -Hendrickson need approval of pond modifications as they
relate to hydrologic and excavation considerations so that design
can begin on outlet structure. The approval would not be final
acceptance of Oak Lake Pond but only approval of size and excavation
changes.
Does the Council wish to proceed with this partial approval?
If you have any questions, please contact me.
JCJ/bc
Attachments
MINNEAPOLIS
2510 Minnehalia Avenue
Minneapolis, MN 55404
Telephone: (612) 721.4877
HAWAII
Suite 1465
Grosvenor Center
733 Bishop Street
Honolulu, Hawaii 96813
Telephone:(808) 523.8861
July 7, 1982
Mr. Dan Boxrud
Short-Elliott--ilendrickson,
200 Cupher Building
222 East. IJ r t ) e C;nuuhi lined
St. Paul, MN 55117
Inc. Consulting Engineers
RE: OUTLET CONTROL, SILVER LAKE PARK
Dear Dan:
Approximately three months has elapsed since we have given you, via
the city of Moundsview, tho ability to proceed with the control outlet
for the Silver Lake Project. Every once in a while 1 get cotples
of correspmtdence related to this project, but could you please give
me an update of where we are and how long you wnuld anticipate that
it would take to complete this project and any costs yet co be incurred?
I would appreciale this as soon as possible,
Slncer
D i
re rs
ULC/dg
cc: Don Pauley, City Administrator, City of Moundsview
KRAUS ' ANDERSON DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
SHORT-ELLIOTT-HENDRICKSON, INC,
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
%I. PAUI, 41INNISOIA CIIIPPIWA IA115, WIM ONSIN
�1ti1'l.l;�l:i
i� i'��l•IV82 � ,
July 13, 198
fl,S�O� is
RE: KRAUS-ANDERSON DEVELOPMENT CORP.
OAK LAKE POND OUTLET
OUR FILE NO. 82021
Kraus Anderson Development Corporation
2510 Minnehaha Avenue
Minneapolis, MN 55404
Attention: Mr. Dale L. Cremers
This letter is to response to your letter dated July 7, 1982,
regarding the scheduling of this project. Since receipt on May
11, 1982 of -the signed copy of our letter proposal dated April 19,
1982, we have reviewed the proposed revision to the storm water
storage pond size and, therefore, outlet structure size. This
proposed revision was recently considered at a Mounds View City
Council agenda session and is expected to be formally approved
soon. We did not proceed with final design of the outlet
structure due to the fact that the drawings would have required
revision if the City Council did not approve the proposed pond and
outlet change.
We have received soil boring information necessary to complete the
deign of this project. We anticipate that the pond and outlet
revision will be approved. We anticipate that final design of the
outlet structure will be complete during the month of July so that
bids could be solicited for construction during August or
September, We will set up the specification so that bids will be
received by invitation.
If you have any questions or comments, please advise.
Sincerely,
Daniel e R. Bo rud
jcj
cc: /on Pauley, City Administrator, Mounds View
200 GOPHER BUILDING • 222 EAST LITTLE CANADA ROAD • ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55117 • PHONE (612) 484.0272
MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Director Public Works/Conm:unity Development
DATE: July 1, 1982
SUBJECT: FINAL APPROVAL OI•' OAK LAKE POND
The City of Mounds• View received a request on May 10, 1982,
from Kraus -Anderson to approve the pond area as modified. The
revised data was sent to Short-Elliott-Ilendrickson for review.
Attached is the Short-Elliott-liendri.ckson response.
In summary, the changes are as follows:
Initial Proposal Revised Proposal
Pond Storage 50 AC -FT 40.5 AC -FT
r-.
Discharge Rate 15 CFS 12.5 CFS
Drainage Rate 266 Acres 203 Acres
Peak discharge rate before development was 64 cubic feet per
second (CFS). The pond therefore meets or exceeds the require-
ments of Resolution No. 983.
The Short-Elliott-Iiendrickson report also comments on the follow-
ing items:
1) Pond storage will be needed for property east of Long
Lake Road
2) Future flow under Long Lake Road will have to be
restricted to approximately 3 CFS with approximately
9 AC -FT of storage.
3) Flow downstream through 27 inch RCP from Ri�ge Lane
to Rice Creek is improved but not completely resolved.
Therefore, it is recommended that the City Council approve the
modified Oak Lake Pond.
JCJ/bc
Attachment
n
PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA
Regular Meeting
July 12, 1982
U� .�'rn Mounds Vies: CitHall
N ArF V[U 2401 Hwy. 10, Mounds View, MN�55112
-----------------------------------------------••-----------------
The Mounds View City Council was called to order 1. Call to Order
by Mayor McCarty at 7:30 PM on July 12, 1982.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Councilmembers Blanchard, Doty, 2. Roll Call
Fors u— n1 , Hodges and Mayor McCarty.
ALSO PRESENT: City Attorney Meyers, Clerk/
A EFRYtrator Pauley and Public Works!Community
Development Director Johnson.
Motion/Second: Hodges/Forslund to approve the 3. Approval of
28,982 minutes as corrected. Minutes:
June 28, 1982
5 ayes 0 nays
Motion Carried
There were no residents requests or comments from 4. Residents
the floor. Requests and
Comments from
the Floor
Clerk/Administrator Pauley asked that Brighton 5. Approval of the
Excavating be added under Excavation under Item Consent Agenda
E.
Councilmember Forslund asked that Item B be
removed.
Motion/Second: Doty/Blanchard to approve the
consent agen3a, minus Item B, and waive the reading
of the resolutions.
5 ains 0 nays Motion Carried
Motion/Second: Forslund/Doty to table Item B
an iscuss at the July 19 agenda session.
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Mounds View City Council
Regular Meeting .�,c .;I . '"
July 12, 1982
------------- -------___
1- 3rt-1=-1164 - - ------------------
Page Two
Mayor McCarty stated he was concerned that a time 6.
frame was not stipulated in the
Approve JAgroi
agreement, and
questioned what could happen if the funds
Powers
ran out
before the project was completed. AttorneyMeyers
advised that y
with Circle
Circle
Trails
a completion date should be
stipulated.
fora
UybLem Master
Plan
Motion/Second: McCarty/Doty to table the joint
powers agreement with Circle Pines until the time
frame provision in the
contract is resolved.
5 ayes 0 nays
Motion Carried
Motion/Second: Doty/Forslund to adopt Resolution 7.
o. an waive the
Consideration o
reading,
Resolution No.
3 ayes 2 nays
1464 Establishii
Performance Gui,
lines for
Clerk/Administr.
for
Motion Carried
Councilmembers Blanchard and Hodges voted against
the motion.
Councilmember Blanchard stated the purpose of the
resolution
was to establish more guidelines for the
Clerk/Administrator position, and
suggested that
if there are going to be additional duties, the
Charter Commission
and the public should have some
input into the decision. She added she has
no
problem with directing Staff, but does not feel
a resolution is the
proper method for that direction.
Councilmember Blanchard also expressed
concern that
in following the direction of the resolution,
tuch timeso
would
hat officeefficiencyncouldpsuffer.
She added
the resolution is vague and nebulous, and could
possibly be used as a method of harrassment.
Councilmember Hodges stated he did not feel the
resolution
was necessary, and would prefer a memo
of understanding, which could be reviewed during
the yearly evaluation.
Councilmember Doty stated he felt this was a Council
resolution, not Charter
action, and is not meant
to be intimidating.
Councilmember Forslundof
understanding could slost dh a nand
get intheeshuffle,lt
she did not see any problem with having a resolution,
it
as will be brought back each year for review and
could be changed then.
Mounds View Planning Commission)
Regular Meeting
--------------------------------
TP'ROVEDage
uy 1.982
Three
xee
------------
Motion/Second: McCarty/Forslund McCarty/Forslund to amend the main
_' motion to c ange Item 2 of Resolution No. 1464 to
eliminate "participate with" and add "direct".
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Mayor McCarty stated he did not feel the resolution
would add duties but felt it was important to give
direction in writing. He added that there had been
discussion on the meaning of the word "significant",
which is used frequently in the resolution, but did
not feel that a disagreement on the meaning of that
word in a particular situation would be a cause for
dismissal in the future.
Motion/Second: McCarty/Doty to amend the main
motion to change Item 3 of Resolution No. 1464 to
read "(or a representative designated by the City
Council)".
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Motion/Second: Forslund/Doty to approve Development 8. Consideration
Agreement. -47, Exhibit 2B. of Amendment to
5 ayes 0 nays First State
Bank of New
Brighton Develoi
ment Agreement
Motion Carried
Motion/Second: McCarty/Hodges to approve the first 9. First Reading
rea ing o Ordinance No. 314. of Ordinance
5 ayes 0 nays No. 314 Esta-
blishing Candi-
dacy Filing Fee
Motion Carried
Motion/Second: McCarty/Doty to table the item 10. Consideration o7
unti t e u y 19, 1982 agenda session. Staff Memorandut
5 ayes 0 nays Regarding Re-
organization
Transition of
Building Inspec-
tion Department
Motion Carried
'Director Johnson reported he has a written propo- 11. Re brt of Direc-
sal on a root control program. for of Public
Works/Community
Development
Mounds View City Council NA
July 12, 1982
DP
Regular Meeting------------DOVED---Page-1'oux----
---------------
Motion/Second: McCarty/Forslund to direct Staff to
raw up a contract with Solidification, Inc, for
root control in the amount of $3,747.00, and an
additional $856.80 for televising.
5 ayes 0 nays
Motion Carried
Director Johnson reported the I&I study is rear
completion, with TKDA having completed monitoring
the system, He added he would have further informa-
tion available at the next agenda session.
Director Johnson advised that the Fairchild Avenue
vacation would also be on the next agenda. He added
that sealcoating would begin either the 22nd or 26th
of the month, and that the Wetlands Subcommittee
would like to have a meeting on July 15 at 7 PM.
Attorney Meyers reported there have been changes
law financial obligation provisions,
12• Report f
y
in the liquor
which he will report on soon to the Council.
Attorney Meyers reported he would not be available
for the July 26 meeting, and would have Mark Carney
attend in his place.
Councilmember Blanchard reported she had received
League regarding
13. Reportof
lmembers
a letter from the Ramsey County
be held on
their general membership meeting to
July 21 at 5 PM, to include a tour of county
parks. She asked that the park people be advised.
Councilmember Doty reported the Park and Rec
Commission had not met for its last two meetings as
they did not have the required quorum.
Motion/Second: Forslund/Hodges to pay Dawson
Construction for the Silver Lake Woods Area City
$184,047.93.
Project 81-3, in the amount of
Motion Carried
5 ayes 0 nays
Councilmember Hodges asked the status of road
mentioning specfically Eastwood and
maintenance,
Woodcrest as needing repair. Director Johnson
replied they will be repaired when the next
paving work is done in the City. He explained
the City crews could not do the repair work them-
selves.
Mayor McCarty had no report.
Mounds View City Council July 12, 1982
Regular -
Meeting --- j �� �� /� N �- ----?Age Five
----------------------- L.� WW ►►..66-- -----------
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported the City 14. Report of
--. had received $185,000 from the State for the Administrator
O'Connell Drive acquisition, and also received
just under $9,000 from the government for the
I&I study.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley asked the Council to
set a special meeting to discuss the policy issues
that were brought up during the first round of
budget meetings. Mayor McCarty set the meeting
for 7 PM on July 20.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported the Association
of Metropolitan Municipalities would be holding a
meeting on August 6 on surface water management,
which Director Johnson was planning to attend. He
asked that anyone else who was interested in attend-
ing let him know so registration could be sent in.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported that an
additional $860 is needed to complete the lighting
at Lambert Park, and reviewed the three options
proposed by the Park and Rec Director for funding.
Mayor McCarty directed Clerk/Administrator Pauley
to take the steps necessary to have the work performed and
submit a recommendation for a source of fundinq. He also
asked for a clarification of the cost of steps for the
warming houses, to be discussed at the next agenda session.
Motion/Second: Forslund/Doty to adjourn the meeting 15. Adjournment
atT- S-M-
5 ayes 0 nays
Respectfully submitted,
Donald F. Pauley
Clerk/Administrator
Motion Carried
!E hnrrnvrh.. 3/42/42
PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA
Regular Meeting
g' �" �yJune 28, HallAM" b� J4 61i% ivy 1982
Mounds View City Hall l 2401 Hwy. 10, Mounds View, MN 55112
---------------- -----------------------------------------------------
The Mounds View City Council was called to order
by Mayor McCarty at 7:30 PM.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Councilmembers Hodges, Forslund,
anc ar , Doty and Mayor McCarty,
ALSO PRESENT: City Attorney Meyers, Clerk/
Administrator Pauley and Public Works/Community
Development Director Johnson.
Motion/Second: Doty/Blanchard to approve the
une minutes as corrected.
4 ayes 0 nays 1 abstain
uncilmember Hodges abstained from the vote as
.,e had not been present at the .Tune 14 meeting.
1. Call to Order
2. Roll Call
3. Approval of
Minutes:
June 14, 1982
Motion Carried
Jim Petrowski, 2708 County Road J, stated he would 4. Residents Requests
like a variance to build a garage as a buffer zone and Comments from
for the traffic on County Road J. He explained that the Floor
due to the heavy traffic, the noise had become a
nuisance in his home.
Mayor McCarty explained Mr. Petrowski had informally
asked the Planning Commission for their thoughts,
and he was informally denied, as they felt it would
be too large a deviance from the 30 foot setback
requirement, as it would be a 40% encrouchment. The
Planning Commission advised Mr. Petrowski to consi-
der planting shrubs, adding insulation, or moving
the bedrooms.
Motion/Second: McCarty/Hodges to.direct Staff to
ring a report from the Planning Commission, giving
the basis for their suggestions as a alternative
to a variance for the Petrowski residence at
2708 County Road J.
ayes 0 nays
Motion Carried
Mayor McCarty stated the City should be able to
substantiate suggestions they make to residents.
Mounds View City Council % �5" June 28, 1982
Regular Meeting _ Pa a Two
-------------------------- -��-- -TI VED----------g----------
He added they will have the PCA do a noise reading,
and will take a look at the present position and
see if there is a better direction to take.
Paul Donley, of the Mounds View School District,
asked the Council for temporary approval to begin
the transformation of Edgewood from a school to a
community center. He explained they have a tenant
that must move in by July 1. Upon questioning by
the City Attorney and Council, he agreed that if
for some reason they were unable to meet the con-
ditions of the conditional use permit, they would
move the tenant out.
Motion/Second: McCarty/Forslund to issue a tem-
porary�con conditional use permit to the School Board
of District 621,
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Dick Povlitzki asked authorization for a license
to sell 3.2 beer on the Waste property during a
weekend festival at his establishment. He
explained the beer would be sold on the Waste
property, but the patrons would also be on his lift
parking lot, and asked if he would be in violation
of an ordinance.
Attorney Meyers explained the ordinance and the
reasons behind it. He stated Mr. Povlitzki would
not be in violation by selling the beer off his
own property, but he could not guarantee there
would not be problems.
Motion/Second: McCarty/Doty to grant a 3.2
Hcense conC gent upon receipt of a formal
letter of application and payment of the
applicable fees, for July 31 and August 1, 1982,
on the property described as owned by Mr. Waste.
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Greg Johnson, 2865 Highway 10, asked for an
explanation of the May 24, 1982 Council minutes,
which state the City is gathering evidence to
take him back to Court. Attorney Meyers explained
they had been questioned by a citizen who was
concerned with a business being operated in a
residential zone, and they are gathering the
evidence to take Mr. Johnson to court for a
home occupation that is inconsistent with
residential property.
Mr. Johnson stated he was not the only one who
was not operating within the ordinances, and
stated he had a complaint against Donald Gross,
Mounds View Cfty council G
,Juue 28, 1982
Regular Meeting Page Three
--------------------------- -_ j-D--------------------
8060 Groveland Road, who had created a nuisance by
' 'aving a live band a beer busts in his yard, and
)hr. Wells, a neighbor whose flowers attract bees,
which go into Mr. Johnson's yard.
Mayor McCarty closed the regular meeting and opened
the first public hearing at 8:00 PM.
Jim Bremmer, 2765 LaPort Drive, explained he had 5A. Fairchild Avenue
initiated the proposal for the vacation of Right -of -Way
Fairchild, and summarized the history of the area, Vacation
citing the problems in maintaining it and the kids
who play and ride their mini bikes there.
Sue Gale, 8227 Groveland, stated she was there also
to speak for Debbie Yost, her neighbor, and
explained that if the vacation is approved, both of
them would have the backs of their lots land -locked,
and would not be able to subdivide in the future.
Mayor McCarty closed the public hearing and reopened
the regular meeting at 8:12 PM.
There was considerable discussion regarding both
positions. Mayor McCarty explained that when the
ile addition was approved, it was felt then that
cul-de-sac could one day be put in to service
the two lots in question. Ile added he was
reluctant to land -lock the property. Attorney
Meyers also reviewed the history of the property.
Motion/Second: McCarty/Doty to direct Staff to
prepare the necessary work for action by the
Council to resolve the Fairchild easement, in
particular the north portion easterly of the
Gale addition, with preservation of the westerly
portion behind 8205 Groveland Road, per the plat
attached to the 6124/82 memo from Staff.
5 ayes 0 nays
Mayor McCarty closed the regular meeting and opened
the second public hearing at 8:32 PM.
Finance Director Brager made a presentation,
explaining the process the City is going through
with federal revenue sharing.
Mayor McCarty closed the public hearing and rcepened
he regular meeting at 8:34 PM.
-mayor McCarty closed the regular meeting and opened
the third public hearing at 8:34 PM.
Motion Carried
5B. 1983 Federal
Revenue Sharing
Proposed Use Hearit
Mounds View City Council--- ry �, r� ? t'"D
June 28 1982
Regular - Meeting--------- 11 �.,9 g�,y -- Page Pour
Director Johnson reviewed the proposed plan and 5C. Subdivision ar'
answered questions from the Council. He stated Rezoning of Da
all recommendations from the Planning Commission Knolls, 7560 Si-.e
had been complied with. Lake Road
Motion/Second: Blanchard/Hodges that the Council
concurs with the Planning Commission's Resolution
No. 55-82, reference the Dailey Knolls'Addition,
including the conditions that are required.
5 ayes 0 nays
Motion Carried
Clerk/Administrator Pauley asked that the explana- 6. Approval of
tion of snowcones be added to Timothy Rice, Consent Agenda
under Item F, and that Robert Schmitt, also for
snowcones, be added to Item F.
Motion/Second: Blanchard/Doty to approve the
=a ti na names under Item F.
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Motion/Second: Doty/Forslund to approve the
consent agenda, and waive the reading of the
ru.301ULiorls. it
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Motion/Second: McCarty/Hodges to transfer 7. Consideration of
U737.0-from the general fund contingency Allocation of Cost
accounto to account 100-120-4303, Administra- Benefit Study Cost
tion, Professional Services.
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Motion/Second: McCarty/Doty to approve the pay-
ment o 5.00 to Gunnar Isberg for services
rendered.
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Director Johnson passed out a memo from the DNR 8. Report of Director
regarding the flood insurance study. He added of runic Works/
he was in contact with Mr. Stein and would lue Community Developm,
forwarding materials received from him.
Director Johnson stated he would review the report
he had received from SEH regarding ponding capacity,
at the July 6 agenda session.
Director Johnson reported a number of calls have
been received regarding the quality of the City
water. He stated they are being logged in and
checked into, bu: .it this time ti-re does not
Mounds View City ' mcil -- A ��. 9 �� - June 28,
t.�1982
Regular Meecine Page Five
-------------------------- o�=� - - ----------------
seem to be any central location of the problem,
!sere was discussion regarding options open to the
.ity, and the cost of adding filtration equipment
to that already in use.
Mayor McCarty suggested a letter be composed quickly
which will explain the situation, and be sent to
each person who calls regarding their water.
Attorney Meyers reported that effective July 1, 9. Report of Attorney
1982, the law authorizes City's to prosecute all
gross misdemeanors, which will involve a great
deal of time on the part of the police officers
and City Attorney.
Councilmember Doty had no report.
Councilmember Blanchard reported she had attended
the League of Cities conference in Rochester, and
felt it was very informative. She also felt that
Mounds View was very progressive in the steps
they are taking now.
Councilmember Hodges reported the Youth Service
ireau had left their budget the same as last
,ear. He added they will be moving to the
Edgewood Community Center.
Councilmember Hodges read a notice of Zak
MacRunnels, who will be awarded as an Eagle
Scout on July 14.
Councilmember Forslund reported she would be
on vacation next week.
Mayor McCarty reported he had received the
annual report from the School District.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported the
Jaycee's would not be holding their rodeo.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported the
Council was invited to the grand opening drawing
of the First State Bank of New Brighton,
on July 1 at 4 PM.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley presented the
Council with a memo from Park Director Anderson,
commending payment for the turf establishment
_ Silver View Park, with a retainage being
held.
10. Reports of
Councilmembers
11. Report of
Administrator
61
Mounds View City Council ��"'� V
June 28, 1982.
Regular Meeting - / a Page Six
------------------------- --�-�k vea---------------------
Motion/Second: Doty/Forslund to approve a partial
gayment in the amount of $14,428.13, retaining
.,000.00, to J & S Sod. The reason for the
.etainage is to insure the seed will meet our expectations.
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Clerk/Administrator Pauley announced he would be
on vacation on July 2.
Councilmember Doty asked the status of the ditch
cleaning on County Road H2. Clerk/Administrator
Pauley replied the contractor has removed the sub-
contractor. He added he would have Director
Johnson check with Dan Boxrud to get the project
finished.
Councilmember Hodges brought up the problem of
the handicapped access at Mounds View Square.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley replied he would call
them again.
Motion/Second: Blanchard/ For slund to adjourn the
mee ni g at 7 PM.
5 ayes 0 nays
12. Adjournment
Motion Carried
i