Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packets - 1982/09/27CITY COUNCII. MEETING CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW September 27, 1982 7:30 p.m. A G E N D A 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call - Hodges, Forslund, Blanchard, Doty, McCarty 3. Approval of Minutes: September 13, 1982 (Regular Meeting) (Received in your 9/20/82 packet.) September 20, 1982 (Special Meeting) 4. Public Hearings - 7:40 p.m. - 1983 Revenue Sharing Budget 7:50 p.m. - 1983 General Fund Budget 5. Residents Requests and Comments from the Floor ------------------------------------------------ CITIZENS: BEFORE SPEAKING PLEASE GIVE YOUR FULL NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE MINUTES ------------------------------------------------ 6. Approval of Consent Agenda ITEM A. Set Wetlands Subcommittee Meeting for September 27, 1982 at 7:00 p.m. ITEM B. Approve Resolution No. 1497 Appointing Election Judges and Establishing Salaries for the State General Election ITEM C. Approve Resolution No. 1494 Approving Securities Furnished by the First State Bank of New Brighton ITEM D. Approve Resolution No. 1492 Approval of the Completion of Development Agreement No. 81-47 for the First State Bank of New Brighton and Release of the Letter of Credit in the Amount of $77,035 ITEM E. Approve Resolution No. 1493 Approval of a Conditional Use Permit for the Conversion of Edgewood Junior High School to a Community Resn»rre Cc -tar ITEM F. Licenses for Approval ITEM G. Approve Resolution No. 1496 Approving Just and Correct Claims Against City Funds -continued- AGENDA September 27, 1982 Page Two 7. Second Reading and Adoption of ordinance No. 316 Amending Municipal Code Chapter 40 Regarding Manufactured Iiomes 8. First Reading of Ordinance No. 318 Establishing Chapter 48 of the Municipal Code Entitled "Wetlands Zoning" (Info on this item will be handed out at the meeting.) 9. Consideration of Resolution No. 1495 Denying Development Request by Dynamic Designers 10. Consideration of Application for Restaurant License and on -Sale Liquor License Transfer from Richard and Marlene Povlitzki/dba Povlitzki's on 10 to Donald W. Baker, Joseph M. Baker, and Patrick A. Conroy, Jr.,/dba Gopher -Shamrock, Inc. 11. Consideration of the 1983 General and Forestry Funds Budgets 12. Consideration of the 1983 Revenue Sharing Budget 13. Consideration of the 1983 General and Forestry Funds Tax Levies 14. Consideration of the 1983 Bond and Interest Tax Levy 15. Consideration of Pinewood Drive Streetlight Petition 16. Report of Director of Public Works/Community Development 17. Report of Attorney 18. Report of Councilmembers 19. Report of Administrator 20. Adjournment 1 11 PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL 3 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA Special Meeting September 20, 1982 Mounds View City Hall ------- -- =2401 Hwy. 10, Mounds View City Hall - �--------------------------------------------- The Mounds View City Council was called to order at 7:07 p.m. on September 20, 1982 by Mayor McCarty. Members present: McCarty, Blanchard, Doty, 2. Forslund, Hodges Others present: Clerk/Administrator Pauley, Finance Director Brager, and Director of Public Works/Community Development Johnson. Clerk/Administrator Pauley presented reports 3, prepared by staff regarding the availability of funds for the purchase of used portable classroom buildings which could be converted by the City into park shelter buildings and other information relating to the purchase price for these buildings, the cost of site preparation for the installation of the buildings, and the heating systems contained in those buildings. Staff also advised the Council that it was the opinion of City Attorney Richard Meyers that the purchase of these buildings did not come under the require- ments of Minnesota Law regarding the letting of bids for purchases exceeding $10,000. The Council discussed the advisability of the purchase of these buildings, the present problems the City is experiencing with vandalism of municipal buildings, and the impacts this purchase would have upon the status of the City,s Special Capital Projects Fund. Motion/Second: Doty/Hodges to authorize the purchase and installation of three park, shelter buildings not to exceed $24,OOO,with the funds coming from the Special Capital Projects Fund, and that the Recreation Activities Fund repay the Special Capital Projects Fund from its year end balances the amount expended by the Special Capital Projects Fund for this item. CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL PURCHASE OF USED CLASSROOM BUILDINGS 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Mounds View City Council September 20, 1952 Special Meeting Page Two Motion/Second; Blanchard Forslund to 4. ADJOURNMENT a jourrn at 7.29 p.m. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Respectfully submitted, Donald P. Pauley Clerk -Administrator `) CONSENT AGENDA September 27, 1982 The Consent Agenda is a technique designed to expedite handling of routine and miscellaneous official business of the City Council. The entire Agenda may be adopted by the Council in one motion. The motion for adoption is non -debatable and must receive unanimous approval. By request of any individual Councilmember, any item can be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed upon the Regular Agenda for debate. ITEM A. Set Wetlands Subcommittee Meeting for September 27, 1982 at 7:00 p.m. ITEM B. Adopt Resolution No. 1497 - Appointing Election Judges and Establishing Salaries for the State General Election ITEM C. Adopt Resolution No. 1494 - Approving Securities Furnished by the First State Bank of New Brighton ITEM D. Adopt Resolution No. 1492 - Approval of the Completion of Development Agreement No. 81-47 for the First State Bank of New Brighton and Release of the Letter of Credit in the Amount of $77,035 ITEM E. Adopt Resolution No. 1493 - Approval of a Conditional Use Permit for the Conversion of Edgewood Junior High School to a Community Resource Center ITEM F. Licenses for Approval General - Expire 6/30/83 Mi1T ton L. Johnson Roofing & Sheet Metal Company - Renewal Timberlane Homes, Inc. - Renewal Kraus -Anderson Building Company - New Heating & Air Conditioning - Expire 6/30/83 Suburban Air Conditioning Co. - Renewal Total Energy Heating & Cooling - Renewal Sewer and Water Webster Co., Inc. - New ITEM G. Adopt Resolution No. 1496 - Approving Just and Correct Claims Against City Funds L n RESOLUTION NO. 1497 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION APPOINTING ELECTION JUDGES AND ESTABLISHING SALARIES FOR THE STATE GENERAL ELECTION WHEREAS, the City of Mounds View is required by State law to hold a General Election on November 2, 1982; and WHEREAS, the City is further required to appoint election judges who will be responsible for conducting the election under the guidance of the City Clerk -Administrator. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mounds View hereby appoints election judges for the State General Election on November 2, 1982 as indicated on the attached listing. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the salaries for election judges shall be as follows: ATTEST: (SEAL) Precinct Chairperson $4.00/hour Precinct Election Judge $3.35/hour Counting Center Judge $4.00/hour Adopted this 27th day of September, 1982. Mayor Clerk -A ministrator r~ f� f r CITY OFF ANDS VIEW PRECINCT NO. 1 CHAIR Janet Strauss IR 7830 Eastwood Rd. 55432 786-2583 JUDGES Marilyn Brick IR 8280 Sunnyside Rd. 55432 784-4794 Marcia Pajak IR 8415 Fairchild Ave. 55432 786-5113 Shirley Buntrock IR 8045 Greenwood Dr. 55432 786-7294 Sharon Moracco DFL 8335 Fairchild Ave. 55432 786-6823 Mary Krusell DFL 7840 Long Lake Rd. 55432 784-5754 Bill Frits DFL 8072 Long Lake Rd. 55432 784-2808 Barb Kavanaugh DFL 7956 Red Oak Dr. 55432 786-9533 PRECINCT NO. 2 CHAIR Jean Johnson DFL 2225 Hillview Rd. 55112 784-8698 JUDGES Betty Piehowski DFL 2259 Pinewood Dr. 55112 784-5373 Mary Preciado DFL 8030 Long Lake Rd. 55432 784-1577 Tom Dreshar DFL 2508 Hillview Rd. 55432 784-8961 Vicki Crowe IR 8145 Long Lake Rd. 55432 784-9237 Judy Petersen IR 5562 St. Stephens St. 55112 786-2194 Cheryl Robinson IR 2104 Rustad Lane 55112 784-7759 LaVonne Olson IR 2215 Pinewood Dr. 55112 784-5209 PRECINCT NO. 3 CHAIR Kathy Mac Runnels IR 7670 Knol.lwood Dr. 55432 786-6091 JUDGES Pat Coffey IR 2757 Hillview Rd. 55432 786-4490 Mary Schroeder IR 8051 Eastwood Rd. 55432 786-5623 Noel Samuelson IR 7765 Spring Lake Rd. 55432 786-5142 Marian Winther DFL 2801 Woodcrest Dr. 55432 784-3196 Roy Nelson DFL 2901 Springview Lane 55432 784-5764 Dorothy Willhaus DFL 5135 Bona Road 55112 786-3052 Delane Erickson DFL 5319 St. Stephens St. 55112 784-4084 PRECINCT NO. 4 CHAIR Pauline Stauner DFL 2454 County Road H-2 55112 786-1151 JUDGES Mary Bixler DFL 2235 County Road H-2 55112 784-8250 Anne Bendt DFL 5392 Quincy St. 55112 784-7157 Helen Ruzynski DFL 5267 Irondale Rd. 55112 784-3899 Lili Ripley IR 2432 Clearview Ave. 55112 786-4693 Robert Zimmer IR 5468 Jackson Dr. 55112 786-6088 7everly Guider IR 5219 "onnell Dr. 55112 7110 1 sabelle Wille IR 7911 ing Lake Rd. 55432 784 COUNTERS Marvalyn Koenker Josephine Baker Marvin Johnson Ralph Hanggi Joyce Brown Murial Holmquist Virqinia Pogainis Lea Burggraff CITY OF !h. JS VIEW DFL 2317 Hillview Rd. 55112 784-7104 DFL 2324 Hillview Rd. 55112 222-6691 (work) DFL 8010 Long Lake Rd. 55432 784-2696 DFL 2475 Woodale Dr. 55112 784-5646 IR 8240 Red Oak Dr. 55432 784-7922 IR 7945 Sunnyside Rd. 55432 784-8984 IR 8290 Spring Lake Rd. 55432 786-7228 IR 2932 Springview Lane 55432 784-4946 a 1' ✓ qL TO: Mayor S Council FROM: Finance Director -Treasurer Brager DATE: September 21, 1982 RE: PROPOSED RESOLUTION ACCEPTING A PLEDGE OF SECURITIES Attached is a proposed resolution accepting a pledge of securities from the First State Bank of New Brighton in the amount of $2,690,000.00. The bank, is proposing deletion and substitution of pledged securities. This is quite common and I recommend adoption of the resolution. DB/ds Attachment RESOLUTION NO. 1494 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION APPROVING SECURITIES FURNISHED BY THE FIRST STATE BANK OF NEW BRIGHTON WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Mounds View has designated the First State Bank of New Brighton as a depository Of city funds; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes 118.01 require that a municipal depository provide securities for collateral; and WHEREAS, the First State Bank of New Brighton has proposed deletion of the following security from being pledged as collateral, and amount description maturity r $300,000.00 U.S. Treasury Note 09-30-82 WHEREAS, the First State Bank of New Brighton pledges the following additional securities; amount description maturity $300,000.00 U.S. Treasury Note 03-31-84 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mounds View authorizes its Clerk -Administrator to approve and accept the securities provided by the First State Bank of New Brighton in Lhe amount of $2,690,000 as listed on the attached document labeled Exhibit A. ATTEST: (SEAL) Adopted this 27th day of September 1982. Mayor Clerk -Administrator • No. 1032—AWpment or Semtllle, to Un of Bend by Public ntCodmtrtL Exhibit A 1l illndhvl, Cu., >Ilnnrq=db _ ElItIttl All lni Jlirnr Vrritrutti. 'I'hat._......First State Bank of New Brighton in consideraron of its designation as a depository of public funds as hereinafter specified, hereby assigns, transfers, and sets over to t........... ........ ................ __..____..._...�__.._____ those certain securities described as follows, to -wit: $ 500,000 Federal Home Loan Banks Due: 12-27-82 17-4 300,000 U. S. Treasury Notes Due: 1-31-83 17-4 225,000 U. S. Treasury Notes Due: 5-31-83 17-4 500,000 Federal Home Loan Banks Due: 3-25-83 17-4 300,000 U. S. Treasury Notes Due: 3-31-84 17-4 300,000 Federal National Mortgage Assn. Due: 10-13-87 17-2 25,000 Cosmos, Mn. GO Due: 9-1-83 17-2 40,000 Sarpy Co., Neb. SID 18 Echo Hill Due: 12-15-85 17-4 25,000 Isle, Mn. ISD #473 GO Schl. Bldg. Due: 3-1-88 17-2 25,000 Duluth, Mn. ISD #709 GO Due: 6-1-88 17-4 I 20,000 Martin County, Mn. GO Drainage Due: 1-1-90 17-4 50,000 Dade County, Florida Due: 4-1-90 17-4 50,000 City of New Brighton, Mn. GO Water Due: 2-1-91 22-1 25,000 Rice Lake, WI Municipal Bldg. Due: 4-1-91 17-4 50,000 Lake City, MN. GO Due: 5-1-91 22-1 25,000 Lakeville, MN. GO Due: 2-1-93 22-1 50,000 Lonsdale, MN. Go Due: 2-1-93 22-1 50,000 Norwood Young America, MN. ISD il109 Due: 2-1-93 22-1 30,000 Forest Lake, MN. GO Due: 4-1-93 22-1 100,000 Plymouth, MN. GO Due: 2-1-95 22-1 RESOLUTION NO. 1492 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA APPROVAL OF THE COMPLETION OF DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 81-47 FOR THE FIRST STATE BANK OF NEW BRIGHTON AND RELEASE OF TIIE LETTER OF CREDIT IN THE AMOUNT OF $77,035 WHEREAS, First State Bank of New Brighton was required by Development Agreement No. 81-47 to provide a Letter of Credit in the amount of $77,035; and WHEREAS, the Letter of Creidt is required to insure that the development is in accordance with the requirements as outlined in Development Agreement No. 81-47; and WHEREAS, all conditions and requirements pursuant to Develop- ment Agreement No. 81-47 have been completedand fulfilled; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View City Council approves the completion of the conditions and requirements ' in Development Agreement No. 81-47 and authorizes the release•bf the Letter of Credit for $77,035 and the issuance of a Final Occugandy for the First State Bank of New Brighton, Mounds View Office, located at 2711 Highway 10; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mounds View City Council authorizes a refund of the unused portion of the administrative fees submitted. ATTEST: (SEAL) Adopted this 20th day of September, 1982. Mayor Clerk -Administrator c RESOLUTION NO, 1493 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OE' MINNESOTA APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THE CONVERSION OF EDGEWOOD JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL TO A COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER WHEREAS, Mounds View School District has requested approval to convert existing Edgewood Junior High School to a community resource center; and WHEREAS, the zoning for the school property is R-1, Single Family Residential; and WHEREAS, a community center is allowed by conditional use permit in an R-1 zoned district; and WHEREAS, the Mounds View Planning Commission has reviewed this application and has adopted Resolution No. 57-82 recommending approval with conditions; and WHEREAS, such conditions relate to the potential need for• additional on -site parking spaces; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View City Council approves the conditional use permit for a community resource center to be located in the existing Edgewood Junior High School building with the condition that after a one-year period, should the City determine that additional on -site parking spaces are necessary, eighty-two (82) spaces will be constructed on the existing hard sur- face area on the east side of the building and access to this lot will be provided conforming to drawings dated June 29, 1982; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that 'the conditional use permit be reviewed by the City on an annual basis to determine whether sufficient parking spaces exist for the continued use as a community resource center. ATTEST; (SEAL) Adopted this 20th date of September, 1982. Mayor Clerk -A ministrator IVP$,Ql,U9?0N NO,1496 1J-,6: 01TY OF MOIINI'L, Vll;t7 CUUN11Y OF 1M.,l?'i :;I'A'IE (IF MINNI':;"O'I'A AITROViNO JII,';I' AND GOplth.(:,r CLAIMS AGAINST CITY FUAIA7 WIIIIlle 1, the City GnttltCI'I or .,, :n:: 11tllMolald:: Vi.Mhwa::ol,❑ fill r:;uant to :utl.horiia w t' 1,111. I'innucial tifl':tlrs of the City mid; WHEREAS, 'I'll(, City Council ho:: rr:vir;x.d I,h,t cL,im:: nurnbern; 9 — LhruuClt 10041 in Lhu nlnounl, ul' 73,989.29 J 812 _ throtgdt 17836 _ in 1,110 nmounl. nl' $ 40,328.59 � 17837 through ti 17840 ht the amrault of ? 569.60 through v in I.ho :wh,nnL of • 1'0'1'AI, ,IMOUNT OF CIAIAU 114,887.48 and has found mid alnims to he ,just and enrreet; — Oki. of any excoption) NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved that the City Council of Mounds View hereby approved the attached lists of claims dated vote ayes Hayes by the AT77ST; higyor (SEAL) Clerk-AdmininLrator IA*"*N CHECK 17837 17838 17839 17840 AMOUNT CLAIMANT PURPOSE $226.10 Chinese Lantern gadabout 152.50 UMD - Glensheen gadabout 171.00 Duluth Superior Excur, gadabout 20.00 $5-60 Northside Christian refund CITY Of MOUNC'S VIEW CH£r,Kf A H 0 U N T 017812 01781S .017814 017815 017816 A C C O U N T, P A Y A$ L t CLAIMANT 200.00 STATE 'R£A:, 61".72 SCOTT KLINEK 352.56 GOPHER AIHLTTIC SUPPLY 29222.28 STATE TREA: - P E R A 29193.75 JCHN C JJHN;O•; 109.44 HELS VAN-0-LL1E 500.00 BRUCE MOORE 500.00 JOSEPH L PILUH 131.00 MN RENAL;: ANCE FE; i IVAL L00.00 C-HANHASSE14 DINNER THFATR 60.00 MHCC CONFERENrE 75.00 BETH GILLMAN LAit O')•2tl-P2 PACT 1 0 S '. SUPPLIE;, U1IL;IIES SUPFLIES,CPLRATINI; SUPPLI�S,CKWIN( PTNSIUIIS DMIN. CHARGE: Pt'AlLC AHU-OTHER PR:?'r3!'r:NaL SERV SUPPLIES, 8LL f,' +C' n;Is PROGRAM IRSTIt ;ti , PROGRAM INSiRLCIC ; SUPPLIES,OPE.RaTIN,f SUPPLIES,OPC,MATIN4 CONFERENCES PROGRAN INSIRUCTOi: i5.00 RHYTHNAIR£, SUPPLIES,OPERATIN, 141.75 RAOISSON ARROWHEAD INN CONFTKENH..S 75.00 MINNESOTA M F 0 A CONfEREA'CE:; 178.50 JANET MOODY PROGRAM INScRUCTOP`. 28,411.55 FIRST STATE DANK OF SALARIES, F-GLLAP — ANJ-:'ALARICJj FMPfPAR- T 29216.97 STATE TREAS - P E R A PENSICN; 100.00 DONALD BRACER SUPPLIES,CFFRATINC 1,877.25 STATE TREASURER PECION5 231.28 ICMA kr.TIREMENT CORP PENSIONS 69,75 G4tiY KAROELL TRAINING 4.78 CUNM.OF_TkAN;PORTATION SLPPLIE_,CPEHATIkG 40028.59 NECESSARY EXPENDITURES SINCE LAST COUNCIL FIETING I - - - --- ---- --,% _ 1.1 CITY OF MOUNDS VI: H A J L N I S P A Y A 6 L CHECK* AMOUN r CLA IHA t: 009898 00959) 001300 009901 009902 019903 009904 009905 k 009906 n 009907 __009908 009909 009310 .. 009911 009912 009913 069914 009915 009916 + 009917 009918 009919 rj. 009920 I".f' 0!-c'6-62 PA.. P U P. P O S E 2 9.36 AMERICAA LINEN SUPPLY CO CLEAN ING-TO41 LS + RAGS 30,00 BRUCE ANDERSON MEHOERSNIi'$ 39.97 EARL f ANOEPSEN + ASSOC SIJPPLI5-oIF41FIC CNTROL.______- 196.50 AGOA7.YHE MIDWEST SATELLITE= 2P.90 OFISSHCNGCR APPLIANCE SUPPLIES, BLCUS+! ND S 30012 OON4LO BRACER CONFEItEACCI ABO-HILEAGE 207*85 BRIGHTON VETERINARY HOSP OTHCk PROFESSNNI! SERV.___— 72,00 CAPITAL ELECTRONICS REPAIPS, EOUI?MEK 107,69 CHIPPEHA SPRINGS CORP SUPPLIES 9CPCRITTI, 409.14 CONTRACT CLEANING SUPPLIES, OLOGS+ AND -JANITOR SI'RVi e. .94 _. COTTENs INC SUPPLIES, VEP,.GLf _ 13,45 CROWN AUTO STORES SUPPLIES, VEHiGLF 138.97 DATA LISPATCH INC CCN-. SVCS., iELIVERY i 1#365,00 ____DATA OPERATIONS, INC. _ _ CON1._SVCS., KEY PUKCH_ 107,70 ,OAVES SPORT SHOP SUPPLIES90PERATING 59.90 FLESCH:. PAPER :ERVIC6� RISC OFFICE SUPPLIES 41,00 GALLAGHER' SEkVILL INC REFUSE. 60LLEf110H 35.00 GENEPATOR SPECIALTY CO REPAIRS, EOUII'HERI i 483.65 GOPHER ATHLE"IG SUPPLY UUIFORH + CLOTHIMG ANO-SUPPLIES,OPERATING 160.00 HAMELC RECRE4TION CU INC SUPPLIES,CPE-IATINL <; 40.80 HEALY L480RATORIES O-HER_PROFES:IONAL SEU 1,316.25 JOHN C JOHNSON ACH1N, CHARGES PAYAOLE. _... AND-OTPER PPOFESSIONA.L_S.E91_�_ 72,71 LAYNE MINNESOTA CO SUPPLLV's UTILITIES „1 if f C I! Y ')F Hp Utli. '' VI r' H CHECK* ANOUI. T 009921 009922 _009923 009924 009925 009926 009927 009928 009929 009930 009931 009932 009933 009934 009935 009936 A C C 0 L N T. P A Y A B L E C L A I M A N T 27,266*19 METP,O WASTE. CONTROL CORM L,A`E J�­23-82 PAf,L 3 P U V P O S E 1!CTRO WAS;z CC'` t.OMM 13,20 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW OEPOSIT.; - HYbltMT 81.28 MOUNDS VItW CUR OWN HOWE SUPPLIES,OPERN_C[yT-_ _._. AND -SUPPLIES, P.LOG54GRHOS AND -SUPPLIES, EQUIPMENT A110-SUPPLIES, UTI.LITIES___ 4.c 75,00 NF,PA HFMHERSHIPS 192.43 N N DELL TELEPHONE CC COMMUNICATION_- IELEPHONE� 156.50 - NLN-9RIGHTON HONE- SUPPLIES,- EQUipa"o-,T_..___ AND-SUPPLIES,OPERI-iING ANO-SUFPLIES, UTILITIES AND-;UPPLIES, OLD,,iGRNOS ANO"EP., BLOCS + GROUNDS _ 223.51 NEW BRIGHTON HONE SUPPLIES-,CPENATING_____ ANC -SUPPLIES, EOUIPMENT AND- LPPLIES, VEhiCLE -------..-- --__ __ ANO UPPL_IES,._fllUfS+GRN➢$_ AND -SUPPLIES, UTILITIES 277.40 NEW BRIGHTON HCWE SUPPLIES,.OPERAT.ING. 1 AND -SUPPLIES, OLCGS+GRNOS ANC -SUPPLIES, EQUIPMENT ANO-SOFFL IES,_..51REM- AND -SUPPLIES, UTILITIE$ " 115,00 NO LEYINGTON LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES,..HLOGStGPNOS 114.43 NOPTHFRr4 BOLT r TOOL CC SUPPLIES, EOUTPHENT 5,972.75 NORIHtRtt `TA'E; PONFk CO CLECiRICITY ANC -NATURAL GAS ANO-STREET_ LIGHTS__ AND -TRAFFIC SIGNA:.S - ELECT 3,9e1.53 NORTNE�N �TATFS_POFE_R ELECTRICLiY AND -NATURAL GAS 89.37 NORTHERN STATES POWER ELECTkICI TY 23.L0 P:PSI COLA BOTTLING CO P, F.' F U N C 55.:0 PI TNEY BOWES INC —^ POSTAGE 47,V0 PRECISION BUS SYST INC REPAIRS, i CITY OF MI:UNU� VIEW A C C 0 U N T S P A Y A B L E CHECKA M 0 U1+T C LA IMA NT 009937 39174.64 'i 009938 35.00 9�- 009939 35.80 ;' 009940 60.00 009941 147.94 !`.-609942 60.00 'i 009943 62.26 009944 89398,93 E009945 450.42 _009946 137.47 009947 __ __ 69973458 009948 94.88 009949 10.00 009950 100* 00 C00951 69.99 009952 3,564.51 DATE 09-28-82 PAC". P U P f' 0 j t 4 RAMSEY COUNTY TREASURER PEPAIRSs U71LITI AND -PRINTING ANO-OTHER PROF"" ICNAL SERI ANO-CONT. SVCS., FAMSEY CN! RE CY CO CEJRI. REMOVAL i s ROAU RUNNER PARCEL :TER CONT. SVCS., CELIVERY.__�< PAhICLA S POSE +• SALARIES TIME S + T OFFICE PRODUCTS HISC OFFICE SUPPLIES i MARY SAARION HEMOERSHIPS " SAUNO£RS-THdLOEN + ASSOC OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERV ;NORTH ELLIOT! AND OTHER PROFESSIU'IA' E•RV SMITH LUMBER CO SUPPLIES+ 9LOL54CPHUS.. _._ _. • . ANO-SUPPLIES9 E6UIPMENT i jI;YOERS_0_F'•UG `.'TOPEo YI;C_OFFICE ANO-SUFFLIESrOPERATING d SPRING LK PARK FIRE DEPT -GRANTS _t.SUB ED1ES_._____ SPRING LAKE PARK LUMBER SUPPLIES9 OLOGS+GRNDS ST PAUL BOOK+STATIONERY FESTIVITIES COMMISSION , T + S TROPHIES ___._SUPPLIES+OPERATING-________ e TAPGE.T MISC OFFICE _.JPFLIES =' _ TE_SMAN OIL COj INVENTORY 009953 10.03 H R TOLL_CDMPANY_ 009954 81.00 TWAN;>CONT_DROKERS.INC__..._ 009955 82.60 Ut.ITOG_RENTALS..SYSTEM 009956 lbl.70 VCNBURG TIRE CO SUPPLIES+OPERATIAG ANO-RENTAL9 L:UIPHENT ANO-TICKETS + ,REGISTRATIOt UNIFORMS t_CLUtAIhG SUPPLIES. VEH(;LE (_c1iY OF MOUNDS VILM CHECK* A M O U N T 009957 19190.1h 84.16 WILCOX PAPER COMPANY 100.00 GEORGE ANORL'S 50.00 CRAIG BYSTEDT 120,00 KATIE FOLEY 129,00 EO GIBSON 25.00 MARLFNt GIBSON 125.00 WILLIAM MAHN 100.00 - KEVIN MORIN -. 226.80 CCANNA MORTENEON 200.00 MIKE OCONNOR _50,00 .. _RAY G PAVLOVSKIS 187.50 NEIL TOBIASON 21.75 ICMA RETIREMENT CORP 5.7.5 GESTETN£R CORPORATION 170.50 05N COFP 190.u0 THE MAC GILLIS t GIBOS 28.06 COUNTRY CLUB MARKET 430.17 JAMES M FREEBERG 12.00 JOHN BLACK 15.GO MP./MRS LEO BLANCHARD 8. UO LOREII A UHASSARD 9.95 H F. ERICKSON CONP414Y I11C 2iS.98 L f A PRODUCTS OF MINN A C C O L N T 5 P I; Y A a L E. C L A I M A N I' CITY OF WHITE BEAR LAKE '- ALARiESr REGIIA., AI;C-PENSIONS AGO-F,I,C,A. - Lr;(`-lgRKCRS ';f'F ._A1ION MIMEC SLFFLIE.' PPOGr?AM INSTPLCTO 5 ---_-,-_— PROGRAM INSTRUCTIRS PROGRAH INSTP"V; • ; PROGRAM.-INSTPUG10i'; PFOGRAM INSTRLC V^ FFOGRAN INSTF'uflri ; - - .r1,� PROGRAM INSTF'uC.t01SW:lab PROGRAM INST�Lf,l:t' S PROGRAP INSTRU,ICI;PROGRAM.INSTRUCJOPSPPOGRAH INSTRUCTORS BOOKS f PERIODICALSs MIMEQ-SUPPLIES-_. SUP PLIESYUPERATINC a SUPPLIESr EOUTFM!.�i - --. Y.V VI - _SUPP.LIES,CFERATINC _ REP.* BLOCS r GRCUND3 A REFUhD a tVPPLIESOPERA' It•t IF R E F U N i �• a SUPPLIESr E9U1_'M11T d• n REPAIRS, E4L1P:1EN n ----._.-----------L v I• DATE 09-l.8-82 rA; 5 P U R F 0 S I CITY OF MOUNT VIER A C C 0 U N T P A Y A O L E CHECK* A M 0 U14 T C LA I M A N T 009981 20.00 JUDY LEW 009982 22,00 METROPCLIIAN OFFICE _A09983 12,00 TATUM MILLER. 009984 56, 80 NO RTIIERN PIPELINE 009985 20.00 MARGE ROELLER —009986 25.00 PEGyY.SEVERSUN 009987 8.00 MYRTLE SHERBROOKE 069988 15.00 CLARENCE SCHER —009989 74.90 ST_PAUL STAMP WORKS INC 009990 27,98 STERLING PRODUCTS 609991 30,00 SUPERIOR CONTRACTORS 114C _009992 _ _ _230,00 EL HARKETING 009993 7.29 FRASER HARDWARE 009994 18.01 JI'5EPHINE BAKER _00999,, 60,37 ANNE UEND.T.- 60,37 MARY BIXLEP. 33,00 LEA NARIE OURGGRAFF 61,25__-__MA.RILYN-HICK ._.-__..-. 31000 JOYCE J BROWN 61.25 SHIRLEY L OUNTROCK 59950 _ PATRICIA CCFFEY 99.50 VICTORIA CROKE 59,511 T110MAS ORESHAR 59,50.. CC LANE ERICKSON 61.25 HILLIAN FRrTS PATE 09-28-82 PAGE 6 'li P U R P 1� R E F U N D M1SC OFFICE Su I"L'1.5 RE_F040 _ OEPOSIIS - HY[FAt• P E FUND ---- R E FUN-.0 —_ R E F U Tf 0 SUF FLI ES,OPF,R AT It. . SUFPLIES,CPEFATIF SUPPLIEi OPERATI' k C F U N 0 CTHE* PR0FE5-z_I0j,AL _aER.V— SUPPLIEigCPERATIFC SALARIES,TEIIP+PART TIME SALARIE59'EMPIM '_LIME SALARIES,TEMF+PART TIME SALARIES,TE'H'+PANT TIME .`. Al AR I c c_r G II P+PERt TTNF_ SALARIES, IEMP+PAR' TIME SALt.'IES,TEMP+PAPI TIME AL01F.SEML#PAR. TIME_—� ;ALAPIES,TEMP+PAR; TIME SPLAI:IES,TEMP+PART TIME :ALARIES,'LHP+PAR' TIME SALAP.IES,IEMP+d,FT TIME 11 II •1 ,n CITY OF MCUNOS VIEW A C C C L r; T" 1' A Y A U L CHECK* ,t s> 010006 010007 i _010008 010009 010010 0.10011 010012 010013 4_ t Of-LO-84 PALE 7 A M O U L' T C L A I M A N T P U R P O t F r 010015 010016 _ 010a17____. 010018 010019 _ O10020 69,37 OLVrFLY GULOER 31.u0 RALPH HANGGI 21.00 MURIEL HOLMOUJsT 75.00 Jf'AN JOHNSON 21. C.0 MA RVIN JOHNS ON 61,25 OARJARA C KAVANAUGH 37.00 HARVALYN KOENKER 61.25 MARY C KRUSELL 75.00 KATHLEEN MACRUNNLL5 61.25 SHARRON 0 MORACCO 59.50 ROY NELSON 5.9.50_ __.LAVONNF OLSON 61.25 MARCIA PAJAK 59.50 BE -Ty PIEHOHSKI _ _.18400 VIRGINIA PCGAINI; 59.50 MARY L PRECIAOO 60.37 LILI 5IGRIL RIPLEY 61.25 ,NER,YL L �10I 'ON 60.37 HELEN RUZYNSKI 59.50 NOEL SAMUEI.SON 59@50_.. MAP,Y_JO 5CHP,CELER 78.00 PAULINE STAUNEB 84.00 JANET 'STRAUS: 60,37 I5ABELLE NILLE 59,50 DOROTHY HILLHAUS SALARIES,TEHP#PA4T TIME SALAF.IES,TEKt'#PAFT TIME ;ALAFTE;,TI;KP.PA.'I TIME ._..__. SALAI'IES,TEMP,PARI TIME 'k ;ALARIE„TEyP,PAR TIME SALARIES, TENIP,PA•; TIHE--_---___--_ SALARIES,TF.YP,PAR TIME :ALAPIFS',Ii:'lPrpa rIME -� SALAPIES,IErP#PA, T TIME_.—_ SALAP,IES,TEHP#PA-* TIME SALARIES,T[MPrPAu TIME - — SALARILS,IEMr•rPARI TINE_ SALARIESITEMP ,PART TIME SALARIES,TEMP:PART TIME SALARIES, TENPD_p.T TIME___ SALARIES ,TEMP#PART TIME SALAPIES,TEMP+PAN ;I4E SALARIES,TEYP+PAFi SALARIES,TEHPFPA+:1 TIME SALARIES,TEMP+PA;t TIME SALARIES,1FMP+P-AA1 TIME_.____ SALARIES,TEMP#PARr TIME SALARIES,IF.MP,PAI TIME �ALAPIES, TEMFWAr TIME_.._.__.___ SALA:TES,IEMPOAF1 TIME 11 • lel CITY OF (ILJ4,. VI, M �;ii CHILY,� A h 0 U i. T C C: tl U' '2 P A Y A F L f, L A I t< A Id I 010031 59.50 HARIAN NINTMFr 010032 60.37 RONF.RT ZIMMER 010033 5.00 NORTH$(UE CHRISTIAN 010034 59.50 JUDY PETERSEN 010035 10.00 DIANNE OAYTON 010036 20,00 LINDA LYN[ 010037 12.00 GLAIR PETERSON 010038 40.00 CANA PONERLEAU _010039 35,40 REPUBLIC AIRLINES INC 010040 4,20 ST PAUL RENT ALL 010041 12,00 JACKIE SHENSON 144 739989.29 CHECKS_-W?ITTEN TOTAL OF L67 CHECKS TOTAL 1149317.88 CATE 09-28.82 PAGI 8 P U R F U S E SA LAkIES,IEMP+Put T1HE ' ;ALAR1ES,iEHPrP4,: TIME P, F. F U h C SALARIES, EMP►PA?I TIME. " R E F U N C 9f. F UN.L R E F U 11 G�. W X PROGRAM 1N;.TRUCTORS SLPPLTES70PER1,TINC SUPPLIES, UTILI"I.,; P E F U N 0 "c/ ," 7 ORDINANCE NO. 316 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA AMENDING THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF MOUNDS VIEW BY AMENDING CHAPTER 40.02, ZONING, RULES AND DEFINITIONS, AND CHAPTER 40.06, ZONING, AREA AND BUILDING SIZE REGULATIONS The Council of the City of Mounds View does hereby ordain: SECTION I. Chapter 40.02, Subdivision B, DEFINITIONS, is hereby amended by adding the following new paragraph and renumbering and rearranging all paragraphs of Chapter 40.02, Subdivision B, into alphabetical order: (68) Manufactured Home. A manufactured home is one that is defined by Minnesota Statutes, 327. SECTION II. Chapter 40.06. Area and Building Size Regulations shall be amended by adding the following: Subd. F Building Design Standards. (1) The length of all residential structures in R-1 zones shall not exceed three (3) times the width, excluding garage. (2) A permanent foundation of concrete, concrete block, or wood and anchoring system as approved by the Uniform Building Code, Chapter 29, is required for all P,-1 residential structures with frost footings of at least a 42-inch depth below grade. (3) All residential structures in R-1 zones, including manufactured homes, must comply with the State Building Code for single family homes. (4) All manufactured homes shall have available for inspec- tion, manufacturer's instructions specifying how said home is to be situated on a permanent foundation. (5) Unless located in a designated mobile home park, all mobile homes or manufactured homes shall comply with the provisions of this Code, as amended from time to time. SECTION III. This ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after the date of its publication. Ordinance No. 316 Page 2 Read by the Council of the City of Mounds View on the day of 1982. Read and'passed by the Council of the City of Mounds View this day of 1982. ATTEST; (SEAL) Mayor Clerk -A ministrator 1 1 11 /i v RICHARD MEYERS, P ATTOIINr..Y AT LAW H!r MUM ♦Vr MYr 8T. PAUL, MINNESOTA 00112 Ir121 mmss SeptonbLr 22, 1902 Mounds View City Council 2401 highway 10 Mounds View, Minnesota 55112 Attention: Donald F. Pauley, Clerk -,Administrator Gentlemen: Enclosed please find a Memorandum prepared by me dated May 15, 1978, whichdiscusses the relationship between the comprehensive plan and the zoning ordinances in force in the City. You will note that I urge the City to take steps to have the zoning ordinance conform to the comprehensive plan. I concluded that it is the zoning ordinances that regulate the use of property and that the comprehensive land use plan will not regulate the use of property until the zoning ordinances implement said plan. This was my opinion in 1978 and it is still my opinion, Yours truly, / Richard iteye'rs hM/ew Enc. 01 MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: City Attorney Richard Meyers DATE: September 23, 1982 SUBJECT: CHAPTER 48 - WETLANDS The proposed Chapter 48 is one of several official controls to be adopted by the City, and the authority for such controls is under its general police power to protect the public health, safety, and welfare of the community. This general power has long been recognized by the courts. The City will be regulating the use of property, but will not be acquiring property rights or rights of ownership. The State has several statutes relating to water management, wetlands, and public waters. M.S. 105 defines wetlands and indicates that the state has adminis- tration over the use, allocation, and control of wetlands in excess of 2-1/2 acres or more (in the City). In that statute the City can establish restrictions upon public access to any wetlands from city or county roads abutting wetlands. M.S. 473.879 contemplates a Water Management Plan, authorizing local official controls and provides that the local comprehensive plan be amended to reflect such controls. It also provides for review and approval by the Rice Creek Watershed District for consistency. M.S. 462.352 provides for official controls by virtue of zoning regulations. It provides for a comprehensive plan (462.355) and for plan effectuations (462.357). Subdivision controls are authorized (462.358) and a public facilities plan can be implemented by a major thoroughfare plan and a community facilities plan (462.359). To implement the Wetlands Ordinance as a zoning control then the provisions of 462.357 should be followed (public hearing, after 10 days published notice - mailed notice not necessary if over five acres of land or more are involved), amendment of the comprehensive plan to conform to the official control (see memo on Rochester Association's case). If the Council intends to adopt Chapter 48 as a police power regulation then the usual procedure for adopting ordinances should be followed (two readings, publication, and no formal hearings). 1 The most conservative approach would be to follow the zoning ordinance procedure, providing for regulation of wetlands by the zoning regulation approach, requiring Planning Commission processes. If the Planning Commission has already approved the ordinance the Council can proceed. If the ordinance is Council originated then it should be submitted to the Planning Commission for review and approval (462.357, Subd. 4). RM/pf 1 J I m 9 !"t:;UliA?;DGb! The following is a ;amrorandu;; relative to the Rochester Association, of xoitjhborhoods v. City of Rochester and Others. This case relate::; to rozcn in%, comprohonsive plan and conditional usa permit considurations. 2S Tile City of iochester (City) rezoned a 1.18 acre tract of land from one-f aiily use and lo4.t density residential to high density residential to permit the building of a six -story 49 unit condominium apartment building on the land. The Rochester Association of Neighbor- hoods (the Association), a group of neighboring property owners, con- tend that the rezoning was presumptively invalid as a "quasi-judicial act" not supported by the council with written findings of fact upon substantial evidence; and that even if it was a legislative act, the rezoning was arbitrary and capricious because it was inconsistent with the City's land use plan and without reasonable relation to the health, safety and welfare of the coirsnunity; and that the ordinance was invalid "spot zoning". The trial court upheld the City's rezoning and the Association - appealed the decision to the Minnesota Supreme Court. The Minnesota Supreme Court upheld the trial court and held that the City's ordinance was a valid exercise of the municipality's delegated legislative power and, upon the record presented, was neither proven to be without reasonable relation to the public health, safety, and welfare nor to be invalid as spot zoning. The land in question was bounded by single-family houses, low density multiple family dwellings, a 29 unit apartment building, and a 35 unit condominium. Across the street was a parcel of vacant land zoned "institutional" and was owned by the Mayo Clinic. Visible from the rezoned tract are the Mayo Clinic Complex Buildings located one block north and one block east and another high rise condominium two blocks array. to the ity council The plannin(j CGf :3l'u 4 4/i tlt thU cityland use that the rezonlltg bu "'On 4 4J incol�ll il:iu .t r� i ;:Cl.l use on the subject plan, which callud for lots du;U.i•' rs recommenda- property. Tito council rejected the ;,�,n;,ing cor�mission council gave no written tion and rezoned the property to R '• ';hc reasons orfllldings 5U?pOr t1rdJ �l:v ru Uning, TFiU CGL 1Ci1's mir,utts iro council nerber1 belieVOd the proposed condo indicated that tminium was needed to serve the city's expanded housing requirements. Council members stated that the property would be an ideal site since it was I located within throe blocks of the central business district, and since high donsity residential uses alreadY across two streets from the property would be compatible with the proposed condominium and Property for any other use unlike' made development of the subject pro p fire council amended its land use After the rezonin action was taken, lan to conform to the rezoninq• public hearings and protested The Association appeared at the the rezoning and sued the City' RECISION between an 1, The court spent some time on distinguishing islative act. If the administrative or quasi-judicial ac6 or a leg' act by the council was found to be administrative, then the municipal - act orting the ordinance as a valid .ty would. have the burden of supp by findings of fact based upon sub - exercise of the police power U( that n a stantial evidence. The Minnesota Supreme Court heft acts inea leg;r, municipality adopts or amends a zoning ordinance, s delegated police powers. As a legisl�,...-� islative capAcity under it rove that act, a zoning or rezoning must be upheld unless opponents p the classification is unsupp orted by any rational basis related to . I.;. romoting tba public health, safety, morals or general welfare, or p without compensation. that the classification amounts to a taking a of review in cases The Supreme Court states that its narrow JCOp legislative body (the of this ityp e reflects a policy decision that a leg' which zoning classifications best sere council) can best determine -2- tae )L',11C }IQl:.4ie. The CO'urt Stated, ":?va;, '.r:•a.'e tha reasonaLleress of a zoning ordinance is de'aaL;b;.e, or 4ore there ara conflicting opinions ns LO C:,_ ,.e; i.rabi?. l.tV of the restrictions it imposes i:i pat :'unction of the courts to inter- fere L;;o lcc:islative discretion on such issues," :he i,tisOCii,L' ,•ued ' : is rule of wo:' �=, ti:a� t: law does not apply Lo SpeC> al sc, 4,cr:cit :;w S>prame CcurL cited the Z ylka case and said, "ile adc;pted tL'a ru10 that where a special use conform- ing wieh the zoning ordinance is requested, a city council's denial of a special use permit to a single land owner is proved prima facie,arbitrary and un- reasonable if it is shown'Lhat the council failed to support its action by written findings of substantial evidence showing the use inpermissible under the Permit standards o_ the ordinance." The ssociation in this case asked the Supreme Court to rule that zoning amendments be reviewed under a like standard and suggest that the only distinction batsaeen special use permits and the rezon- ing is the label "rezoning". The Supreme Court did not agree and said as follows: "While an arendment of the zoning ordinance can permit particular property to be used in a manner formerly forbidden by the: ordinance, 'a special use provision merely pormits property, within the discretion of the governing body, to be used in a manner expressly authorizud by Lie ordinance'. In passing a zoning or rezoning ord`_nanee, a city council is required to maize a legislative judgment that a certain zoning classification"";,il 'promote tho public health, safety, morals and l;encral welfare.' In granting or denying a speciril u:u: ,;o ;,:it, a city council is not altering the legislative judgment as to the zoning classification, Rather, it has 6he function, adjudicative in nature, of applying specific use standards set by the zoning ordinance to a particular individual use and must be held strictly to those standards. "The proposed 'nigh density use of the subject land was not in conforniL'y with existing zoning classifications and therefore could not have L-een accomplished through a special use permit -Me use could be permitted only thrqugh amerdme:a of the zoning ordinance. This was not a case whom the council was enaf.;led to obtain a lesser standard of judicial scrutiny than would otherwise be applied sis:ply by choosing to label its action 'rezoning'. An amendment of Lil.: zoning ordinance was required and once was pas:%c:d. No other label would have applied to the council's actio:.. S9:e council's amendment of the ordinance, under o.::; previo.:s ;holdings, involved a legislative judgment and as such immust :;a reviewed under the narrow scope of judicial review idled•" 2. The next arguni,::t prusuntud %.as that the council acted arbitrary and q uYlelous and wi Lileui :C.: Gla ilu rClation to promoting public health, safety, ;,:ore::; and gunor.al wulfaru. This was based on the fact tllaL tnU Grui:iii:iJ.i ii:'lGiiiiiy LhU rUj;Cl:4.y, when adopted against the planning co,..missi.on's reco;,.r.enciatioa, was inconsistent With the city's land usu plan, waL; tiv..rCa ter amended to con- form to the zoning chatrju. Thu Supru;1-u Court says that although other states have required conformance to the city's land use plan when zoning, they do not find that requirement in the Minnesota Statutes. The court citos 462.351 to 462.364 which provides for the adoption of a comprehensive land use plan to guide future developments in a municipality, and 462.357 which provides the municipality with power to effectuate its land use plan through zoning. Although the Association argued that the comprehensive land use plan must be amended before a zoning ordinance can be amended, the Minnesota Supreme Court said, "We read the Statute to require only that a land use plan be adopted before the initial zoning 1 ordinance is adopted. The Statute in fact does not require even that the zoning ordinance conform exactly to the City's land use plan. While it may seem desirable as a matter of municipal planning to amend the land use plan before adopting an in- 9 consistent zoning ordinance, s c a requirement is j properly a matter for the legislature, not for this I court, to consider." I In upholding the City's position, the supreme Court said that the City strictly followed the procedures of 462.357, Subds. 3 and 4, requiring that a proposed amendment to the zoning ordinance first i be submitted to the planning agency for a recommendation and that public hearing be held. "There is nothing in 462.357 which makes -� the recommendation of the planning commission binding upon the city council or governing body." The Supreme Court then upheld the City's action and did not find that it had acted arbitrary and capricious and examined all of the evidence relating to the surrounding property and the need for the particular facility involved in the zoning. 3. As to the question of spot zoning, I would only indicate that the definition for this term as set forth by our Supreme Colut -4- is "zoning ci:anges, typically limited to small plots of land, which establish a use classification inconsistent with surrounding uses and create an island of non -conforming use within a larger zoned district, and which dramatically reduced the value for uses specified in the zoning ordinance of either the rezoned plot or abutting property." The court did not consider the City's action as spot zoning. It should be noted L%at thu.-. was a dissenting opinion and felt that there should be no distinction between the granting or denying of a special use purmiz and the rezoning of a parcel of land. CONCLUSION 1. zoning or rezoning actions by the city council are legis- lative acts that the courts will sustain unless they are clearly arbitrary and capricious and are not supported by any rational basis related to promoting the public health, safety, morals, or general welfare, or that the classification amounts to a taking of someonds property right without compensation. 2. That as to special or conditional use permits, a denial of one is prima facie, arbitrary and unreasonable if it is shown that the council failed to support its action by written findings of substantial ovidunce showing the use inpermissible under the ep rmit standards of the ordinance. 3. That although it may he desirable that the comprehensive i �i land use plan be censirj' en1. with the zoning plan, the Minnesota Supreme Court does not interpret the applicable statutes to make consistency a requirement (unless the Minnesota Legislature so determines at a later ti;;;e) and finds no problem with the amendment of the corprahe nsivo land use plan subsequent to the rezoning ordinance as was done in the Rochester Case. by reco.numondation would be that the planning authorities of the City should endeavor, w;;.:naver possible, to maintain consistency between the land use plan and the :toning plan. Implicit in this decision, is that it is t:aa zoning that controls the use of the -5- property and not: the corapieiiensive i u.0 uae plan. Ahcre is also a question as to waat of OCt ti o rC:::0:1S1VG lan4 USe plan would have on the issuance or Uenlal Of uric permit request. it appears that the existing ordinances reguldting conditional or special use permits are the sole criteria that will be used to determine the validity of the council's action in granting or denying a special or conditional use permit. The zoning, ordinances regulate the use of property. The comprehensive land use plan will not regulate the use of property until the zoning ordinances implement said plan. 1Z � pectfu y SUb� fitted, i L (�ucliard ;7cyers� `ounds View City ttorney r , May 15, 1978 r 1lil;O1,11111O11 No. 1499 CITY OF MOUND!; VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY 11TATH Oil MINNESOTA RESOLUTION DENYING DEVE1,O11MEN'I' Iil{QUI;1;'1' BY DYNAMIC DESIGNERS WIIEREAb, the developer. for Dynamic Douignorn has roquosted City Council approval to proceed with construction of two fourplox dwellings on two lots within Mound" Vlow; and WHEREAS, portions of those lot" Ito within area" prenantly regulatod by Ordinance No. 301 entltlodI "An 011111a1100 Prohibiting Development of Private Wetlands oil an lntur.im Basin"I and WHEREAS, following review of tlic nito and data eubmltted by the developer, it has bean determined that a largo amount of fill will be required within the designated wotland area to acuommodato the pro- posed development; and WHEREAS, there is an insufficient amount of existing dry/ buildable land to complete the proposed projects and WHEREAS, any building development that would occur on the lots would encroach upon the existing wetlands NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mounds View finds that there is insufficient dry/buildable" land within the proposed sites to allow developmant of the proposed project and denies the request by Dynamic Designers to proceed with development based upon the regulations of ordinance No. 301, amended by Ordinance No. 305. ATTEST; (SEAL) Adopted this 27th day of September, 1982. Mayor er -A ministrator R/�i0 MEMO TO: Mayor and City Coin, FROM: Clerk-Administrato, DATE: September 23, 1982 SUBJECT: APPLICATION FOR RESTAURANT LICENSE AND TRANSFER OF ON -SALE LIQUOR LICENSE FROM RICHARD AND MARLENE POVLITZKI/dba POVLITZKI'S,ON 10 TO DONALD W. BAKER, JOSEPH M. BAKER, AND PATRICK A. CONROY, JR./dba GOPHER -SHAMROCK, INC. Attached please find copies of brief biographical histories and reference listings for the individuals requesting the restaurant license and transfer of the on -sale liquor license for Povlitzki's on 10. Due to a misunderstanding of the desires of the City Council, a listing of neighbors in the area of Conroy's Bar and Lounge were provided rather than letters of reference as was requested by the Council. Members of the Police Department contacted four individuals who reside within one and a half blocks of Conroy's Bar and Lounge, with all four indicating that Conroy's is a well run business and that they had no complaints regarding its operations. The Police Department and staff also contacted various references provided by the three individuals and in all cases were informed that these individuals are reputable and that they would have no hesitation recommending these individuals for an on -sale liquor license in the City of Mounds View. Also, the City has been advised that Mr. Joseph M. Baker will be the named licensee and the Manager of Povlitzki's on 10, with Mr. Patrick Conroy, Jr., assisting him in the management of the operation. Should Council require any additional information on any of these individuals or their application for licenses, please advise. Attachments �I Donald W. Baker lives at 3275 Glen Oaks, White Bear Lake, Minnesota. He residesere alo g with his wife of 29 years. They have lived at this address since they built this home in 1968. They are the parents of six children. Four of their children, Joseph, William, Thomas and John attended and graduated from the University of Minnesota. Their daughter, Molly, attended and graduated from St. Catherine's College of St. Paul. Their youngest son, Don Jr., is attending St. Thomas College of St. Paul. Presently Donald Baker is part owner of a company called Sterling Investments, Inc. He owns this business along with one partner. This company is in the business of selling businesses and do specialize in the liquor industry, and the selling of Liquor Bars, Supper Clubs and Package Liquor Stores throughout the state of Minnesota. The company is 17 years old and Mr. Baker has been with the company since 1976. Prior to working for Sterling Investment, Mr. Baker worked for Griggs Cooper Co. Inc., St. Paul, Minnesota as a wholesale liquor salesman and as a sales supervisor. He worked for Griggs Cooper Co. for a total of 13 years. Prior to working for Griggs Cooper Co., Mr. Baker worked for National Biscuit Co., Minneapolis, Minnesota. Mr. Baker worked as a salesman for Nabisco for twelve years. Prior to that time Mr. Baker was in the U.S. Navy; prior to that time he was a student. In the last six years Mr. Donald Baker, in addition to selling a variety of liquor businesses, also became part owner of a liquor business on two occasions. During 1977 Mr. Baker was part owner of the Depot Bar at 241 E. Kellogg Blvd., St. Paul, Minnesota. He sold out his interest to Doug Alley late in 1977. In 1978 Mr. Baker became part owner of a business in St. Paul called the Chain Link at 2210 Hudson Road, St. Paul, Minnesota. In both of these cases Mr. Baker became involved in these businesses in lieu of commission buL did not paiticipate iri the management of either place, did not receive any income, make or implement any policy. As a Business Broker it developed that Mr. Baker came to know Mr. Richard Povlitslci and Mr. Pat Conroy Jr Mr. Pcvlitski bought and sold a bar that Mr. Baker's company acted as the agent. Mr. Baker got to know Mr. Conroy Jr. when he purchased his present bar 5!; years ago. As a Business Broker Mr. Baker now has Mr. Conroy's present bar for sale, mainly because he wants to move on as his present bar lacks enough parking. Mr. Donald Baker is the President of the buying corporation known as the Gopher -Shamrock Corporation. Mr. Joseph Baker will be the manager of Povlitski's and he will be the person responsible to the City, to operate the bar in a manner satisfactory to the City. I Mr. Donald W. Baker References Business: Mr. Robert E. "Mike" Ruddy 900 N.W. National Bank Building V.P. Alexander and Alexander St. Paul, MN 55101 Phone 227-9201 Mr, Edwin Martin 6950 Wayzata Blvd. Minneapolis, MN 55416 President Business Marketers Phone 546-7527 Mr. Floyd E. Jetland 151 Windsor Lane New Brighton, MN 55112 Home Phone 636-0269 Mr. Donald Mattaini 406 - 6th Avenue South South St. Paul, MN 55075 Home Phone 451-0809 Neighbors: Mr. Richard A. Korfhage 2599 Oak Drive White Bear Lake, MN 55110 Home Phone 777-8474 Mr. Richard Kuchera 2574 Oak Drive White Bear Lake, MN 55110 Phone 777-4852 Mr. Lawrence R. Arseth 2610 Oak Drive White Bear Lake, MN 55110 Phone 777-7281 Mr. Kenneth Kieger 2592 Roth Place White Bear Lake, MN Phone 429-0141 u Mr. Donald W. Baker References continued. Law Enforcement: Deputy Chief Thomas Hagen City Hall Maple Wood, MN 55109 Phone 770-4534 Lt. Russ Bovee St. Paul Police Dept, Narcotics Dept. Phone 291-1111 N Mr. Joseph M. Baker is the oldest son of Donald W. Baker and Mary A. Baker. Joe Baker was born June 6, 1955, attended grade school in Maple Wood, Minnesota, attended junior high school and high school in White Bear Lake, Minnesota. Joe Baker graduated from White Bear Lake•High School in the upper 10 per cent of his class. He won athletic honors in baseball, football and hockey. After graduating from high school, Joe Baker was recruited to play college football for a number of schools but decided to play Junior A hockey for the St. Paul Vulcans and Coach Doug Woog for a year before going on to college. During this year Joe Baker worked at Otto's Liquor Store in Mendota, Minnesota. Herb Brooks recruited Joe Baker to play hockey for the University of Minnesota, which he did for the following 4 years. Joe did have a chance to play for two National Champions in 1976 and again in 1979. Joe is the Gopher part of the Gopher -Shamrock. After leaving the University, Joe joined his father at the Sterling Investment, Inc. Company and has worked there full time since. During this time he has gained knowledge in the operations of a wide variety of liquor businesses. Joe Baker is now married and has a two year old little girl. References: Mr. John Brink Hennepin County Prosecutor Phone 377-7020 Mr. Brad Buetow Head Hockey Coach University of Minnesota Phone 3I3-4225 Mr. Mike Andrews Owner of Sargent Preston's and The Loon Cafe of Minneapolis, MN Phone 332-8342 Dr. James Boo Mahtomedi Dentist Home Phone 429-9257 Office Phone 426-2116 Joe Baker has been active in community work with young people and the problems of the abuse of chemicals. For a character reference in this regard please contact; Mr. Lyle Helke 429-5391, Extension 362 A I 14 Mr. Patrick Conroy, Jr. is the son of Patrick Conroy, Sr. He has three brothers and three sisters. He was born in St. Paul, Minnesota on June 14, 1953. He attended school at St. Thomas Grade School and Hill High School. After playing on some of the excellent Hill High School hockey teams and graduating from High School in 1971, Pat Conroy, Jr. left St. Paul and went on to the University of Notre Dame. He attended Notre Dame for four years, received a Degree in Business and played hockey for the school for four years. He was captain of the hockey team in his senior year. Pat is the Shamrock in the Gopher -Shamrock. Since college Pat Conroy, Jr. has gotten married, had two little girls. He worked for his father in the Conroy Construction Co., has been assistant hockey coach at Saint Paul Academy, and operated his own business, Conroy's Bar in St. Paul for the last 5� years. Pat Conroy will assist Joe Baker in the operation of Povlitski's. Neighbors in the area of Pat Conroy's Bar. Dave Neuman 991 Arcade St. 776-5062 Dick Verrette 957 Jenks 776-7207 John Dagen 896 Jenks 776-8591 Herman Voerding 843 Jenks 771-2483 Don Jackelen 1007 Arcade 778-8425 Ron Hunt 839 Jenks 776-9553 Mike & Mardell Lowry 846 Lawson 774-6646 Greg Bradley 723 Jenks 776-1129 Tony Kwiatkowski 1137 Jenks 771-6356 Mike Fitch 847 Lawson 771-2777 0 • TO: Clerk -Administrator FROM: Police Department DATE: September 22, 1982 RE: Liquor License Application for Povlitzki's The following investigation was done on Conroys Dar, 992 Arcade, St. Paul: Drove to area of 992 Arcade and observed it to be a small neighborhood business area. According to a resident on Jenks Ave. there are very few private residences in the area, most are duplexes. Interviewed 4 individuals, 3 males, 1 female, on the street near Conroys Dar. All four stated that they lived within a block and a half of the bar. All four stated that Conroys was a well run business and they had no complaints. Called St. Paul Police Department, talked to a member of the Narcotics Unit. Records in that Unit indicate no drug investigations during past 5 years involving Conroys. Called St. Paul Police Department, to a member of the Vice Unit. Records in that Unit indicate no liquor violations or problems related with prostitution during past 4 years involving Conroys. Called Maplewood Police Department, talked to Assistant Chief, Thomas Hagen. Ile stated that he's known the. Baker family since 1955 and coached all the boys in Little League Baseball. Stated all of the Bakers are fine people. His personal knowledge of Joe Baker is that Joe is a fine young man. Called St. Paul Liquor Licensing. Was informed that there was no complaint against Donald Baker regarding any business operations. From all information obtained in investigation, both applicants appear to be completely acceptable. 1�1 s' MEMO TO: Mayor and City FROM: DATE: September 23, 1982 SUBJECT: PINEWOOD DRIVE STREETLIGHT PETITION Attached please find a copy of a petition received by this office for the placement of two streetlights on Pinewood Drive between Quincy Street and 35W. The petitioners have requested the placement of lights between 2071 and 2077 Pinewood Drive and 2127 Pinewood Drive. Staff review of the petition per a memorandum and attached map from Engineering/Planning Technician Frank Kampel indicates that the petition complies with the City's requirements, however, one location proposed by the petitioners has been determined by representatives of Northern States Power to be inaccessible due to the lack of a pole in the rear yard supplying primary power. Staff has discussed an alternate location •t, i .. ible for the d:.$trlh.i ti^n pj:oposed by NSP Wli. h the inuaiVidual rccp0...ns+ of the petition within the neighborhood, Mrs. Larry McLaughlin, who has indicated that the alternate site would be acceptable. Based on these discussions and the acceptability of the alternate location by residents in the area staff would recommend Council authorization for the placement of streetlights on Pinewood Drive between 2127 and 2119 and between 2085 and 2077 Pinewood Drive. Northern States Power has indicated that these lights would be installed at no expense to the City of Mounds View, therefore, our expense would be limited to the payment of the monthly operating costs for these lights and sufficient :ponies appear to be available in the budget for this purpose. DFP/pf Attachments PETITION l WE THE UNDERSIGN {lOULD LIKE TO PETITION THE CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW TO INSTALL 2 STREEI LIGHTS FOR THE RESIDENTS OF PINEWOOD DRIVE PARELLEL WITH COUNTY RD I AND BESIDE HWY 35W, ONE TO BE INSTALLED BETWEEN 2071 AND 2077 PINEWOOD DRIVE AND THE OTHER ONE AT 2127 PINEWOOD DRIVE, NAME ADDRESS %77,4�4� /77...,.QCN Aj r»T�n.�lf�.1_ 7,n% ri��•! l' �f'l� 4/• �L�v' ->Lr�z �n.� :v�c:'2�.1�.:: /'� •i', _� �� t,:,�—•�.�•/nC�./1. 0 r- ��16 � i )j ice{"Y`•Zk •r--- !--/ J.5 ^ �. b 1 �.(,.A^G .�d i j , MEMO TO: Clerk -Administrator FROM: Engineering/Planning Technician FJ DATE: August 16, 1982 SUBJECT: PINEWOOD DRIVE STREETLIGHT Attached is a map showing properties which signed a petition (shaded) for a street light on Pinewood Drive between Inter- state 35W and Quincy Street, and also location of existing streetlgiht and rear vard poles. A signature from the School District has not ben :obtained (technically a directly affected property owner) but because of distance, any street light on L 1llCYIVVU lV4 ..Vvi..n a Dr is t a iffet cthan a;newnod School orooerty. Other than this, all conditions will be met if streetlights are placed in the locations shown on the map. These possible loca- tions are very near those proposed by the petitioners. There is presently no streetlight at Pinewood Drive and the pedestrian walkway nor at Pinewood Drive and the 35W frontage Road. Also attached is Resolution No. 1069 which sets policies for street light installations and the petition. FJK/bc Attachments f3 1 2 I a0431r+32 h d J T�. M J� 3 r ,2 1 Q ?4 2 • I r 30 31' 32 L' e , , �., w n•. rns1 � � , N 714.. I r�IIN` 13 IG II ! If' 1 9 I P 7 I p 5 4 3,1 2 I I 28 • / I . ]',, 18 19• 120 121 122 , 23 2a 12- ,_6 ; 27 (i i 29 30 i 31 DR;? �- ' , r I 16 ,5 I 11 ! 13 12 11 o E 7 i 6 5 .4 3 2 I 2 •...� {�17i1819I2021221;21124•25f2E27i28I29I30i31!,3 It V i I Q „� . I • I l ,•- I ., .1.,._L�.-u_.i� �� • •I' I I l.. .rig n DR3 ' I IF ,�7s., j�•• I r! Ip I IS 14 ! 13 12 a IC i 9 p l 776� 4327, � _.w,.,c A- A AF1Q6 �— c --r-+r�.�•c err : �- 26 D R. . Hillview Road Oakwood Drive X EXISTINII, POLE ,c Iosslst - u HT ,., I-ocATl A. EX15TW& L. a T PRoFoseo wbµT by P Priom Terrace Drive This is a compilation of 'sources affecting the ar vised and updated by Com This drawing is to be us purposes and Comstock 6 responsible for any inac, tained. 3 PinewoAd Dr. \\� County . 1 " ' _ _._ - —CD 3 (vim Wr Kvz I PIPE- b612 RIjE) WIIRRI:AS, a:u•I: ,n It,r City Council. • for the iusl.lJJ.:t.Inr of :tr! 1. 11oht,:1 WHEREAS, budget item, and n;,zraLing strco WHEREAS, tl:e City Council desires Lo maintain and enhance the safety of its neighborhoods through Lhc provision of street lights while at the same lime keeping the t.nx burden of operating street lights at a minimum; NOW, THEREFORE, BE 11' RE'SCITNED I,y the Council. of Mounds View L'haL the following pol i­• shall aov..rn tion of street lights in roai,hnitial .,I,.c:: Property owner; dw.i1ir�! inn! .i;l,, ,i :Uecl' lighl:s shall submit. .I;,-,Iilicn: reque!a,;wi ouch o.;Lh t.hrr siynat:ures of at least f.ifLy percent of rho affoclod property owners. All signatures of persons on Lhe pet.ition shall mean their consent to Lhe locm.ioni of Iho 1i;ht, on or near their. property. The pct..it.ion ::hall include sitm,aLuros of consent of the property owner dirvellp ,iff,:•:t.••;l by Lhc final location. A property ,;wncr slc.1] i h-t a,• rr. v! to he affected if his/her property is within 200 i'vot it, an" •ilrect direction from the prnpo od stir(o light lncatL•n on nft.her "side of the street. ,t{r_ilgl9�l1"� The proposed location shall mcN at least one of the following criteria: EWVM 17 9, shrug :turves, cul do sacs, dead ends, l.onq blocks, ''vandal i.xr•d areas, or MW A showing of need for a similar criteria may also quali.fy. The rriteria must he related to a need for public safety. All street .lights shall be spaced at least 400 feet apart unless the above criteria apply, rn no case shall lights be closer than 250 feet to one another. All new street light installations shall he 100 watt pressure sodium at a 30 foot mouhLiny height. Street lights shall be included in all public projects according to the above, rriter.io. Qualifying requests for street lights may be scheduled for installation in a subsequenL year .if tho City Council deter- mines sufficient funds are not available in the current city budget. this llth day of CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW CITY COUNCIL Special Council Meeting October 9, 1982 7:00 p.m. 1. Consideration of Resolution No. 1502 Levying Delinquent Utility Charges and Staff Memorandum 2. Consideration of Contract Extension with John Johnson for Professional Engineering Services and Staff Memorandum Agenda Session October 9, 1982 1. Consideration of staff memorandum regarding parking on Greenfield Avenue and County Road I 2. Consideration of staff report on Airport Operators Meeting 3. Update on Union contract negotiations 9. Consideration of staff memorandum regarding Health Service Officer 5. Consideration of letter from Bruce Malkerson representing John and Jim Miller regarding Wetlands Ordinance 6. Consideration of staff memorandum regarding specifications for the purchase of a one ton dump truck 7. Review of City Newsletter copy 8. Reports of Director of Public Works/Community Development A) Discussion of culverts along County Road I and St. Michael and St. Stephen B) Report on meeting with Ramsey County Public Works Department C) Consideration of final payment on Sealcoating project D) Status report on SEH projects (memo to be handed out Monday evening) E) Report on Met Council revised transporation development guide/policy plan for 2,000 (Public Rearing on 10/12/82) F) Report on water study *4u TO: Mayor & Council FRCM: Finance Director -Treasurer Erager 'DATE: September 30, 1982 RE: CERTIFICATION OF DELINQUENT ACCOUNTS TO WE COUNTY Pursuant to Council direction given at the September 27, 1982 meeting a list of persons ageing money to the City other than utility bills is attached. These include amounts due for tree removal originally billed in the fall of 1981, developer's administrative charges and insufficient funds check charges. I spoke with the City Attorney and was advised that at the present time the City has authority to levy a tax only for delinquent utility bills and tree removal charges. In his opinion no authority exists to levy a tax for other amounts due to the City. Subsequent to the City Attorney's opinion,letters (registered mail - return receipt requested) were sent to those individuals that have past due utility and Lxee removal bills. The ietLi:rs aiivi5iti of CAWlcil's intention to consider levying a tax on their property for the past due amounts unless payment was received or an agreement for installment payments was entered into by October 8, 1982. A copy of the letters sent is attached. October 8, 1982 was chosen as the last day for payment or entering into an agreement because October ll,(the next working day) is the last day for giving the County a signed resolution authorizing the levying of the tax. If it is Council's desire to levy a tax for delinquent utility and tree removal bills, staff suggests a resolution be adopted stating any amounts remaining unpaid at 4:30 p.m. October 8, 1982 be levied as a tax against each affected property. Enclosures: List of delinquent utility bills List of delinquent tree removal. bills List of delinquent administrative charges List of insufficient funds check charges Copy of letter on delinquent utility bills Copy of letter on delinquent tree removal bills Proposed resolution levying a tax for delinquent utility and tree removal bills 9/21/82 DELINQUENT 0 UTILITY BILLS Account Name & Address Water Sewer Late Chg, Sub 59 1-006920 Gordon Smith Penalt Total Adm.Fee Final Total 2816 Ardan Avenue 15,95 24,50 19.10 59.55 2.99 62.54 1-009550 Steve Miller 2174 Belle Lane 21.91 24.50 30.35 76.76 3.84 80.60 1-015000 Ralph Zeglin 5046 Brighton Lane 59.40 24.50 27.61 111.51 5.57 117.08 1-019200 Dennis Cooper 13.75 24.50 18.41 2209 Bronson Drive 56.66 2.84 59.50 1-020050 Daniel Hill 2808 Bronson Drive 12.10 24.50 11.51 48.11 2,at 5052 . 1-023150 Roger Janssen 2440 Clearview Avenue 27.50 24.50 22.64 74.64 3.74 78.38 1-027000 James Deutsch 5294 Clifton Drive 18.70 24.50 21.74 64.94 3.24 68.18 1-061700 Beverly Fisher 2901 County Road H2 0 63.50 91.85 155.35 7.77 163.12 1-083100 Larry Wedin 7990 Eastwood Road 208.00 24,50 106.26 338.76 16.94 355.70 1-083950 Nellie Domeier 0 39,00 8171 Eastwnna Fc;d u 0 1.75 36.75 1.-111600 James Carter 7660 Greenfield Avenue 13.75 24.50 15.43 53.68 2.68 56.36 1-120560 James Schorn Sr. 8400 Greenwood Drive 31.90 24.50 24.03 80.43 4.03 89.96 1-127800 Daniel Reis 7710 Groveland Road 22.00 24.50 20.97 67.97 3.37 70.84 9/21/82 DELINQUENT UTILITY ➢ILLS Account # Name & Address Water Sewer Late Chg. Sub 58 Final Penalt Total Adm.Fee Total 1-133400 Country Kitchen 988.96 759.50 672.71 2,444.00 122.20 2,566.20 2145 Highway Avenue -Tax 22.83 1-150300 Larry Parks 15.95 24.50 12.49 52.94 2.64 55.58 2504 Hillveiw Road 1-150350 Thomas Dreshar 6.05 24.50 13.77 44.32 2.22 46.54 2508 Hillview Road 1-158050 Harry Stanke 0 24.50 9.47 33.97 1.67 35.66 5387 Jackson Drive 1-164500 John Pickar 11.00 24.50 20.92 56.42 2.82 59.24 2299 Knoll Drive 1-167900 Allen Bonin 25.30 24.50 21.16 70.96 3.54 74.50 7090 Knollwood Drive 1-179100 Mrs. Arthur Docken 3.85 24.50 8.52 36.87 1.85 38.72 2235 Lambert Avenue 1-181600 Leona Kuehn 33.00 63.50 65.24 161.74 8.08 169.82 2349 Laport Drive 1-183850 William Tisdell 24.75 26,19 20.71 71.65 3.59 75.24 2740-42 Laport Drive 1-199800 Gary Grieme 3.30 24.50 15.17 42.97 2.15 45.12 5172 Longview Drive 1-209350 Thomas Blomberg 3.30 10.23 5.21 18.74 19.68 207). Oakwood Drive .94 1-211550 Marie Paul 15.95 24.50 12.77 53.22 2.66 55.88 2250 Oakwood Drive 9/21/ DELINQUENT UTILITY BILLS Account # Name & Address Water Sewer Late Chg. Sub 5% Final Penalty Total Adm.Fee Total 1-217400 Robert Waste Jr. 5290 Pinewood 52.25 44.00 37.03 133.28 6.66 139.94 Court 1-219900 Eugene Wilson 2119 Pinewood Drive 8.80 24.50 10.82 44.12 2.20 46.32 1-224150 Joseph Witzmann 16.50 24.50 19.26 60.26 3.02 63.28 6991 Pleasant View Drive 1-224600 Donald Harrison 0 63.50 23.11 86.61 4.33 90.94 7069 Pleasant View Drive 1-225700 Marvin Hanson 8360 Pleasant View Drive 18.70 63.50 43.03 125.23 6.27 131.50 1-22aen0 5399 HarreQuincy ll Ham^ .aon Street „ i1.60 20.42 12.b9 50.71 2.53 53.24 1-239800 G.I. Properties 29.70 49.00 32.91 111.61 5.59 117.20 5741-43 Quincy Street 1-243800 Thomas Chelberg 11.00 24.50 11.84 47.34 2.36 49.70 5045 Rainbow Lane 1-307400 Larry Stevens 5132 Red Oak Drive 9.43 0 10.04 19.47 .97 20.44 1-315150 Paul Johnson 6.05 24.50 16.03 46.58 2.32 48.90 8368 Red Oak Drive 1-315450 Richard Huhne 0 24.50 7.60 32.10 1.60 33.70 8406 Red Oak Drive 1-327850 Bonnie Erdman 0 24.50 9.31 33.81 1.69 35.50 2434 Sherwood Road 1-334750 Jim Wyatt 7288 Silver Lake Road 16.50 24.50 17.11 58.11 2.91 61.02 9/21/82 DELINQUENT UTILITY BILLS Account # Name & Address Water Sewer Late Chg. Sub Penalt Total 1-340000 Donald Elofson 23.10 23.78 18.13 65.01 5261 Skiba Drive 1-344950 Ken Bourke 33.00 44.00 33.75 110.75 8249 Spring Lake Road 1-355450 Roger Scheid 8.80 24.50 14.33 47.63 5520 St. Michael Street 1-381450 John Westlund 12.65 24.50 11.69 48.84 5092 Sunnyside Road 1-410800 Frank Young 36.30 63.50 50.07 149.87 2138 Terrace Drive 1-410900 Daniel Miller 19.25 24.50 13.30 57.05 2146 Terrace Drive 1-424100 Ronald Novak 35.75 49.00 23.42 108.17 7626 A & B Woodlawn Drive 1-427450 Betts & Belisle 12.65 24.50 18.07 55.22 7889 Woodlawn Drive 1-172000 Thomas Field 0 0 3.96 3.96 8409 Knollwood Drive TOTALS 1944.40 2113.62 1725.54 5761.39 Tax 22.83 58 Adm.Fe 3.25 5.53 2.39 2.44 7.49 2.85 5.41 2.76 .20 290.32 DE.T. NQUENT 'I'Ril REMOVAL GIAR�iII5 Lawrence Simon $119.05 Allen Bonin $193.45 Thomas Holm $ 66.15 Thomas 11all $212.40 M.S. El-Ralawani $101.05 Spars Properties $199.90 Joseph D. Ryan $ 83.75 John li. Mathern $ 76.45 X 9/30/82 DELINQUENT ADMINISTRATIVE CHARGES 9/30/82 Charbonnoau Subdivision $ 39.33 Gale Addition $ 79.64 Miller Industrial Park $842.72 'I"I ff INSUFFICLENT FUNDS CHECK CHARGES Robert Linse $ 5.00 Theis Const. Co. $ 5.00 Rosemary SLrus $ 5.00 James Peterson $ 5.00 Patricia Thompson $ 5.00 Melvin Schuchard $ 5.00 W.T. Lindsay $ 5.00 Kenneth Link $ 5.00 Daniel Reis $ 5.00 Robert Waste Jr. $ 5.00 Orreen Jeska $ 5.00 Kenneth Berryman $ 5.00 Patricia Reis $ 5.00 David Hilbrands $ 5.00 Jim Whittle $ 5.00 Dennis Smith $ 5.00 Spagenski's Transfer $ 5.00 Gary Lavasseur $ 5.00 Patrick Denney $ 5.00 Deborah F. Wood $ 5.00 Robert Waste Jr. $ 5.00 J & E Electric Co. Inc. $ 5.00 Eugene DeWitt $ 5.00 J & E Electric Co. Inc. $10.00 Larry L. Stevens $ 5.00 Bob's Trophies Softball $ 5.00 R. James Zeglin $ 5.00 Harry T. Stfus $ 5.00 W.T. Lindsay $ 5.00 Beverly Hines $ 5.00 Marvin Morse $ 5.00 Steven Miller $ 5.00 Robert Rogers $ 5.00 Abel Ruiz $ 5.00 Melvin Schuchard $ 5.00 Gordon Bayerkohler $ 5.00 Achievements In Design $ 5.00 9/30/82 INSUFFICIENT FUNDS CHECK CHARGES (continued) Joseph Weller $ 5.00 Gordon Oayerkohler $ 5.00 John E. Pickar III $ 5.00 W.T. Lindsay $ 5.00 David Hilbrands $ 5.00 Robert Ludgate $ 5.00 Steven Miller $ 5.00 Andrew Wilson $ 5.00 Russ Warren- DFL $ 5.00 Caroline LaPoint $ 5.00 TOTAL $240.00 9/30/82 0 i September 29, 1982 As you may recall, you have received several reminder - notices regarding the past due amount of $ on your utility bill. Since these reminders have not resulted in pay- ment of the past due amount or execution of a written agreement providing for installment payments, the City Council will be considering the levying of a tax on your property for the past due amount during their meeting October 4, 1982, to be held at 7:00 p.m. in the Mounds View City Hall. Past due accounts certified to the Ramsey County Department of Property Taxation for collection with property taxes payable in 1983 will include an administrative fee of 5% and interest on the total amount at a rate of 88 for one year. If it is your desire to avoid having the past due amount levied on your property taxes, you may do so by mailing payment in full or entering into a written installment payment agreement no later than 4:30 p.m. on October 8, 1982. CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW Donald Brager Finance Director -Treasurer DB/ds September 30, 1982 As you may recall, you have received several invoices for trees removed from your property in the amount of $ Since these reminders have not resulted in payment or execution of a written agreement providing for installment payments, the City Council will be considering the levying of a tax on your property for these tree removal costs during their meeting October 4, 1982, to be held at 7:00 p.m. in the Mounds View City Hall. Amounts certified to the Ramsey County Department of Property Taxation for collection with property taxes payable in 1983 will include an administrative fee of 58 and interest on the total amount at a rate of 88 for one year. If it is your desire to avoid having these tree removal costs levied on your property taxes, you may do so by mailing payment in full or entering into a written installment payment agreement no later than 4:30 p.m. on October 8, 1982. CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW Donald Brager Finance Director -Treasurer DB/ds RES0LUTION NO. CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Mounds View, Minnesota, was duly called and held in the Council Chambers in said City on the Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: A RESOLUTION LEVYING A TAX FOR DELINQUENT UTILITY AND TREE REMOVAL CHARGES OVER A ONE YEAR PERIOD WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed all property to which there is a delinquent utility or tree removal charge; and WHEREAS, it has been determined each affected property is responsible for each charge the owner has incurred; WHEREAS, each affected property owner has been notified of said delinquent charges and of the Council's intent to consider the levying of a tax for such delinquent charges over a one year period; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Council of the City of Mounds View hereby authorizes and directs the City Clerk to certify to the Auditor of Ramsey County a list of those delinquent ..td 13 ty d ......c t clargcz; ..hi.d. i.3v .^ u ut�y ai,u licu 3".vmQJat uuuay„ .. ., r2maiu unpaid ao cf p..... October 3, 1982, said list made a part herein, for certification against the tax levy of said property owners for the year 1982, collectable in 1983, and which listing includes an administrative fee of five percent (58). Interest shall be figured at the rate of eight percent (8%) on the total amount for one year. Total amount to be certified: $ The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Member and upon a vote being taken, the following members voted in favor thereof: and the following members voted against same: whereupon said resolution was declared passed and adopted this ATTEST: (SEAL) Clerk -Administrator T0: Mayor & Council KOM: Finance Director -Treasurer Brager rTE: September 30, 1982 RE: PROPOSED AMENDMENT OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT WITH JOHN JOHNSON An amendment to the Professional Services contract with John Johnson has recently been proposed. it is my understanding that this proposal would increase the current contract by 360 hours or $8,100. Based upon discussions with Mr. Johnson, it is my understand- ing that the 360 hours are estimated to be allocated among the following projects: Project }lours Wetlands 180 Water study 40 MSA 5 year plan 40 Community Development Department Administration & Supervision 100 60 Possible funding of the 360 hours could be: Fund/Project Hours Amount Genelai Fuld 900 M.S.A. Study 40 $ Administration 50 1,125 TOTAL GENERAL FUND 90 $2,025 Storm Water Management We 180 $4,050 Water Administration 25 $ 563 Water study 40 900 TOTAL WATER FUND 65 $1,463 Sewer ARm istration 25 $ 562 TOTAL 360 $8,100 September 30, 1982 Page 2 Sufficient unused budgeted personal services funds exist in the Street Departmentidue to reorganization, to pay for the projected General Funds share of proposed contract costs. As of August 31, 1982 there is an unemcumbered balance of $18,271 in the Street Department Personal Services accounts. If desired $2,025 could be transferred from the Street Department budget (100-270-4010, Salaries) to the Public Works/Community Development Department budget (100-260-4303, Professional Services) for the General Fund's share of the contract. The SWM Fund does not have an annual budget. Projects are individually authorized and funded by the Council. If desired a portion of the contract costs could be designated as being paid for with SWM funds on hand. The Water and Sewer Funds are earning interest on temporarily idle funds at a higher rate than was budgeted. Therefore, sufficient funds will be on hand to fund their share of the contract. If you have an_v questions do nnr hesitate to contact me. DB/ds 1 6601 - 75th Avenue N. Brooklyn Park, Minnesota 55428 September 27, 1982 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Mounds View 2401 Highway 10 Mounds View, Minnesota 55112 Ladies and Gentlemen: This letter is to confirm amendment of Professional Services Contract dated May 6, 1982 between the City of Mounds View and John C. Johnson. Existing contract expires October 9, 1982. This amendment extends the contract thru December 31, 1982 at the average rate of 30 hours per week for a total of 12 weeks. The new total maximum manhours will be revised upward from 700 to 1060. It is further, agreed that attendance at regular and agenda City Council and Planning Comnission meetings shall be reimbursed at a flat rate of 2 hours per meeting. If this agreement amendment is satisfactory, then please sign in the spacE provided and return one ropy to me. Very truly yours, 00 n C. John i, P.E. JCJ/cj cc: Don Pauley ATTEST: Accepted this _ day of 1982 by the City of Mounds View, Minnesota, by Mayor MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Director Public Works/ Community Development DATE 7 September 27, 1982 SUBJECT: Professional Services Contract Attached is a copy of proposed Professional Services Contract amendment which would extend the existing contract thru the end of 1982 at the average rate of 30 hours per week. This would increase the current contract by 360 hours or $8,100.00. The amendment also provides for a flat fee per meeting for regular and agenda Council and Planning Commission Meetings. Under the current contract a total of 650+i hours have been expended thru September 28, 1982. Summarized below is breakdown of how the hours have been utilized: Hours % of Total 1. Wetlands/Flood Plain Ordinance & Storm Water Management Plan 13212 20.4 2. Preparation for and attendance at Council Meetings 102 15.7 3. 1983 Budget Preparation 74 11.4 4. Departmental Coordination M2 10.8 5. Department Head & Staff Meetings 48 7.4 6. Sanitary Sewer Department Coordination 281, 4.4 7. Water Department Coordination 421; 6.5 8. Storm Sewer & Street Department Coordination 41; 6.4 9. Community Development/ Engineering Department, Coordination 21 3.2 10. Administration of Improve- ment Projects 291; 4.5 11. Initial Coordination, Reorgani- zation and Miscellaneous activities 461; 7.1 12. Preparation for and Attendance t at Planning Commission Meetings 14 2.2 TOTAL 65012 100.0 Mayor and City Council Page 2 September 27, 1902 Review work load from 8/8 thru 9/25 indicates that Public Works/ Community Development Department administration has required at a minimum 1631 hours per week. Other activities such as water study, I/1 Study and administration of improvement projects have required another 3 hours per week. Three significant engineering projects need to be completed yet this year: 1. Storm Water Management Plan (see attached memo) 2. Water System Study by T.K..O.A. 3. Minnesota State Aid 5 year Plan In order to complete these projects daily departmental involvement should be scaled back to 0 to 12 hours per week leaving 10 to 20 hours per week to work on special projects. If you have any questions, please contact me. JCJ/cj Enclosure 7 IJ 11 MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Director Public Works/ ( (� Community Development G, DATE September 27, 1982 SUBJECT: Tentative Schedule to Complete Storm Water Management Plan The Mayor requested that an estimate of the work necessary to complete the Storm Water Management Plan by December 1, 1982. The following is a brief outline and estimated time required to complete the plan. Mounds View currently has 20 storm water drainage subdistric s as delineated by SEH in 1976. The area covers all or part of )R-section naps. It is estimated that to bring the Storm Water Management Plan to near completion the following activities and manhours will be necessary. I. Delineate drainage areas or, topo map 32-40 hours 2. Establish runoff factors 32-40 hours 3. Map and calculate drainage areas 50-60 hours 4. Calculate estimated peak discharges 16-24 hours 5. Calculate existing system capacity 16-24 hours 6. Analyze system capabilities and alt,Hydrologic models (i.e. no, limited, or full develop-ment) 32-40 hours 7. Prepare draft plan and report 12-16 hours TOTAL 190-244 hours Technician activities 60- 74 hours NET TOTAL Weekly average needed to complete by December 1, 1982 JCJ/cj 130-170 hours 14-20 hours qltO.144� i i:EMO TO: Mayor and City Counc'1 FROM+ Clerk-Administrato DATE: September 22, 1982 SUBJECT: PARKING ON GREENFIELD AVENUE AND COUNTY ROAD I As a result of comments made by Councilmember Forslund during the September 13th Agenda Session and numerous complaints this office and the Police Department have received regarding the placement of no parking signs by Ramsey County along County Road I, staff has reviewed the matter to determine the extent of the problem and evaluate what possible solutions might be available to the City. In evaluating the situation, staff took two basic steps to evaluate the situation. The first was to determine the avail- ability of off street parking to the apartment buildings on Greenfield Avenue between Bronson Drive and Cou,ity Road I, and on County Road I from Greenfield Avenue to Adams Street. Attached please find drawings prepared by the City's Community Development staff indicating the number of apartment units in each of the 1 buildings and the amount of parking lot spaces available to those units in off street parking areas. In reviewing these drawings please note the following: 1. The Bronson Drive apartments involvina 46 apartment units have available 64 unmarked spaces and 24 garages, totaling 88 parking spaces or 1.91 spaces per unit. 2. The Greenfield Avenue apartments involving 125 apartment units have 133 marked spaces and 126 garages, or 2.07 spaces per unit. 3. The eight unit apartment buildings on County Road I between Greenfield Avenue and Jackson Drive consist of 40 apartment units with 54 parking spaces to the units, or 1.35 spaces per unit. 4. The Mounds View Estates apartments between Jackson Drive and Adams Street on County Road I consist of 24 apartment units with 28 parking spaces available to those units, or 1.17 parking spaces per unit. On the evenings of September 14th and September 16th, 1982, a survey was taken of the parking lots for these apartment buildings by the Mounds View Police Department. Attached is a report from -z- the Police Department indicating that on both of those evenings there were numerous spaces available in the parking lots for these apartment buildings and that the cars parking along the City streets by these buildings could be accommodated in the vacant spaces contained within those parking lots. In evaluating the situation, staff feels that there is sufficient parking available to the dwellers of these apartment buildings should they make use of the parking lot and garage spaces provided by their landlords. Staff would request Council authorization to contact these apartment building owners to inform them of the complaints the City has been receiving from residents in the area regarding the on street parking practices of their tenants and request that they advise their tenant: that they are to begin making use of the off street parking provided or the City will be forced to place parking restrictions on all residential streets adjacent to their buildings. Your direction in matter would be appreciated. DFP/pf I Attachments TO: City Administrator and Engineer FROM: Police Chief DATE: September 17, 1982 RE: Parking On 9-14-82 at 11:00 PM and on 9-16-82 at I1:00 PM, a survey had been taken at the Greenfield and Groberg apartments. Attached are the results. I would recommend that the apartment building owners be contacted and informed of the complaints we are receiving regarding their tennants parking on the street and that they should notify them to park in the lots or we will be forced into posting "No parking signs" on the streets by the apartment buildings. 9 1 TO: Police Chief FROM: Corp. Brick BATE: September 14, 16, 1982 RE: Parking 9-14-82 23:00 Hours I checked the parking lots of the Greenfield Apartments from 7521 to the last one at County Road I. There were 34 unused parking planes in the parking lot. There could even be more if the cars parked properly. On Greenfield Ave. there were 17 cars parked nn the East side of the Street. On the West side of the street there was only 8, they were all South of the houses on the West side of Greenfield. 9-16-82 23:00 Hours Groberg Apartments West of Jackson: 19 - open spaces in the lot 4 - vehicles parked on Jackson just North of County Road I. 2 - vehicles parked on St. Stephens Northbound Greenfield Apartments 7521 building North to County Road I: 31 - empty spots in parking lot 7 - vehicles parked Southbound on Greenfield 16 - vehicles parked Northbound on Greenfield 0 • c A m m z m a G m L—i 24 &ARA&ES Z3 UNIT5 I-1 SPACES Il '5FACES 23 UNIT5 t3wt-IsoN dRI�E 6FAGE FoR t 30 6AF6 (UNMARKED) a4 z4 4(0 E 0 SRONSOO AQTS. UMM/tRKED 5pjv S &A"&FS ArPARTMENT UNITS 0 .7 S 8 g 8 UNlrb UNljs UtJljS UNITE 2B R SAC ES F u 0 z 9 8 F 8 8 0NIT6 UNI S L_J l.J I fR I IINITg U�'!T5 23 tFACES PAVED AREA 2S G,' Cs WwmaRL- 5 SPACL's ART MOUNDS VIEW c-sTATFs —___--- wesT OF JAGYh04 BA*r of jmw. 6ti 54 6 f A(96 28 9pr c e6 0 &AMC-66 u bAjLh&ft 4o Apr. UNITS z4 Api - UNITS COUNTY RI> I F c >a m m Z. "n m ti G 11� c m Iy SPACES I"1 uNITs 7GGI � P� n m 11 UNITS 7G51 I L+ ^JpAC E5 14 SPACES IS SPAGES 17 UNITS 1&41 li UNITS 7 I I7 UNITS 531 I1 UNITS 52 �1 GREEfJFI F1U >�sT�TEs ;w c c m 0 MARKED SPAGES iz(p l'JY1Ki'1�c I25 ApAXTME 00ITs IS SPACES VA' Z '1 MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Clerk -Administrator DATE: September 23, 1982 SUBJECT: AIRPORT OPERATORS MEETING On September 17, 1982 Mr. Tim Anderson of the Metropolitan Airports Commission met with local base operators at the Anoka County -Blaine Airport which staff of the City of Mounds View was invited to attend pursuant to the agreement reached with the City Council at an earlier meeting with representatives of the Metropolitan Airports Commission and fixed base operators. At this meeting both myself and Building Inspector Steve Rose, who is a trained pilot, attended to listen in on the discussions and relate to the airport operators the problems the City has been experiencing with flight operations over the City of Mounds View. The operators discussed the various problems they experience with the use of the airport as it relates to takeoffs and landings from the north/south runway and the present status of the operating procedures for the Anoka County -Blaine Airport. The following solutions were suggested by the airport operators to reduce the amount of takeoffs and landings occurring directly over the City of Mounds View as much as possible. These solutions, however, will not eliminate the flyovers from occurring as operators not using the Anoka County -Blaine Airport as their base will continue to fly in and out of the airport resulting in flyovers over Lhe CiLy, as well as weather conditions which might prohibit the use of other operating procedures. The solutions suggested by the operators are as follows: 1. When taking off to the south from the north/south runway pilots should be instructed to take an immediate left turn at County Road J and follow County Road J to the east along the ramp entering the 35W freeway. 2. Establish a right hand turn procedure for takeoffs to the north on the north/south runway which would result in landing approaches coming from the east over the undeveloped areas of Shoreview and following County Road J rather than approaching to the west and flying over a large portion of the City of Mounds View prior to their final approach over the airport. 3. Obtain funding from the Metropolitan Airports Commission for the installation of VASI lights on the south leg of the north/south runway. These lights are designed to let a pilot know when they are below the 700 foot limit established by the airport, thus, hopefully reducing or eliminatinq the number of flyovers occurring below the 700 foot level and creating the noise problems we have recently been experiencing. -2- The first two items relate to changes in the airport's operating procedures which will be instituted as soon as possible. The third requires that action be taken by the Metropolitan Airports Commission and Metropolitan Council to approve the expenditure of funds for the installation of a VASI light system. This being the case, it would appear appropriate for the Mounds View City Council to take a position on the proposal for a VASI light system as our input will be requested by the Metropolitan Airports Commission and Metropolitan Council during their approval process. Staff would appreciate Council direction in this matter. Should you require any additional information, please do not hesitate to let us know. DPP/pf r MEMO T0: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCI FROM: Clerk-Administrato DATE: September 27, 1982 SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEALTH OFFICER As you may know, the City's Civil Defense Emergency Plan provides for a health Service providing for the public health interest of the City during emergency conditions. The City's Public Health Service Officer has been Dr. Herbert Strait. In attempting to obtain Dr. Strait's signature for the revised Emergency Plan this office was advised that he has recently died. Therefore, it will be necessary for the City of Mounds View to obtain the services of a new Public Health Officer. In light of this information, staff contacted Mr. Ray Zink, Director of the Ramsey County Department of Public Health,and determined that Ramsey County would be willing to serve as Public Health Officer as they do for other cities in Ramsey County under their agreement with the Ramsey County Department of Emergency Services. Should Council find this direction acceptable, staff would request your authorization to commence drafting a joint powers agreement with the Ramsey County Department of Public Health for their services as Health Service Officer under our Emergency Plan. DPP/pf P POPHAM. HAIK. SCHNOBRICH, KAUFMAN IS DOTY, LTD. 43441DS CENTER MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA SS402 1 \ IREPIIONL AND TELECOPIEn 0I2-333.4800 WAYNC 0 POPHAM RAYMOND A. MAIN ROGER W. BCMNODnic-, DENVER KAUFMAN DAVID B. DOTY ROBCRT A. MINIBH ROLFE A WORDCN 0. MARC WHITC14CAO BRUCE D WILLIS FREDCRICK S RICHAROS O. ROBERT JOHNSON GARI R. MACOMBER ROBERT O. BURK HUGH V PLUNKETT. III FREDCRICK C. BROWN THOMAS K. BERG BRUCE D. MALKERSON JAMES R. STCILCN JAMCB 0. LOCKHART ALLEN W. HINDCRAKER CLIFFORD M. GREENE D WILLIAM KAUFMAN OCSYL L PEICRSON MICHACL D FRCCMAN THOMAS C OAOUILA LARRY 0 CSPCL JANIC S MAYERON DAVID A JONES SALLY A JOHNSON LEE C SHEEHY LESLIE GILLCTIE MICIULL T NILAN ROBERT C MOILANCJI DAVID J. E000IST CATHERINE A POLASKY STEVCN G IICIKCIIS KATILLEEN M MARTIN NANCY J TUNITAK JOHN C. CHILDS THERESE AMBRHSNO DOUOLAS P SLATOU Mayor and City Council City of Mounds View 2401 NE Highway 10 New Brighton, MN 55112 September 27, 1982 1600 PCTPO-LE WIS TOWER DENVER, COLORADO 00202 TELC)NONE A40 ILLECOPICR 303•825.2000 SUITC 802.2000 L STRCCT N W WASHINGTON, D.C. 20036 TC LC PH CAN 0 TCLCCOPIER 202.001-5I54 Re: First Reading of Proposed Wetlands ordinance Dear Mayor and City Council: This office represents Messrs. John and Jim Miller who own property within the City. The value and potential use of the property will be adversely affected by the adoption of a wetlands ordinance in the form now proposed. My clients have asked that I advise them as to the effect of the proposed ordinance, if adopted, on the potential use of their property. I have several questions concerning the ordinance which I ask the City to answer as part of the public review of the proposed ordinance: 1. Is 14th Draft 9/10/82, Revised 9/15/820 the most recent draft? 2. Where is the "City of Mounds View Wetland Zoning District Map"? We want a copy of it. (See Section 48.02 of the ordinance.) POPHAM. HAIK. SCHNOBRICH, KAUFMAN 6 DOTY, LTD. Mayor and City Council e September 27, 1982 Page 2 3. Where is the "Wetland Areas of the City of Mounds View" prepared by Ramsey Soil and Water Conservation District, dated December, 1981? Vie want a copy of it. (See 48.04, subd. 5.) 4. Is there a drainage way as defined in 48.04, subd. 6 on the Miller property and, if so, where? 5. What is the justification for a 100' wetland buffer area of a wetland? (See 48.04, subd. 7.) 6. What portion of the Miller property is within the Wetlands zoning District? (See 48.04, subd. 8.) 7. Where is the wetlands drainage district for the Miller property? (See 48.04, subd. 9.) 8. What are the terms of the easement referenced in 48.05, subd. 4 and how will the area of the easement be determined? 9. flow will the City determine the amount of filling allowed pursuant to 48.06, subd. 3A and the equal apportionment of fill opportunity? What amount will be allowed for the Miller property? 10. If fill is allowed and the owner must first dredge out the "bad" soils before filling, is there a need for a dredging permit? (See 48.06, subd. 3D.) 11. What rates of discharge of storm water to the wetland will be allowed from the Miller property? (See 48.06, subd. 3D1 and 2.) 12. The Millers own approximately 60 acres, 45 of which have been tentatively referred to as wetlands by the City. The minimum lot size for the use district is 1.5 acres. a) flow will the development density credit affect the 1.5 acre minimum lot size? Is there 100% transfer? Will the hardcover restrictions be modified to allow full utilization of the density transfer? (See 48.08; subd. 1.) W POPHAM, HAIK, SCHNOBRICH, KAUFMAN & DOTY, LTD. Mayor and City Council September 27, 1982 Page 3 b) May Millers use the "wetlands" for 100% of the required park dedication on their property? 13. What is the legal description of the Wetland Zoning District overall, and on the Millers' property? (See 48.15, subd. 2.) This ordinance should include now at least the following: 1. Right to build parking lots in the wetland. 2. Right to use the wetland for 100% of the zoning and subdivision requirements for: a) Setbacks. b) Lot area. c) Open space. d) Drainage areas, ponds and improvements. e) Park dedication. f) Floor area ratio limitations. g) Installation of sewer and water pipes and other public utilities. 3. A right to fill at least 50% of the wetland without need for a variance. The Millers object to the adoption of this ordinance and believe it is arbitrary, unreasonable, confiscatory as to them and their property and constitutes an unconstituitional taking of their property rights subjecting the City and council members voting for it to a claim for compensatory and punitive damages, if adopted. If changes are made to the ordinance, the Millers may not need to sue the City and council members, and the majority of the wetlands in the City can be 'acquired' at no cost to the City. The City Council cannot expect t•o take all of the wetlands in the City without first paying for them. POPHAM. HAIK,SCHNOBRICH, KAUFMAN & DOTY, LTD. Mayor and City Council September 27, 1982 Page 9 The Millers want to work with the City if possible. I request that the City Council direct its staff to meet with the Millers and me to discuss the above questions, provide answers to them, and see if a development plan for the property can be developed which will eliminate the need to litigate, very truly yours, 44e U Vz 1. yx Bruce D. Malkerson V� BDM/jf 1429j M MEMO TO: The Mounds View City Council FROM: Bruce K. Anderson, Director Parks, Recreation and Forestry DATE: September 30, 1982 RE: Truck specifications and City Newsletter The final truck specifications and City Newsletter will be delivered on Friday for the City Council's review. It should be noted that the City Newsletter will be going to the printer by noon on Friday so any changes or modifications the Council desires should be called into staff by Monday morning if at all possible. Should you have any questions, please feel free to give staff a call at extension no. 41. BKA/sll MEMO TO: The Mounds View City Council FROM: Bruce K. Anderso , r Parks, Recreation es DATE: September 29, 1982 RE: Dump Truck Proposals This is just a short note to follow up on my staff memo dated September 13, 1982 regarding staff's progress regarding the purchase of a new or used dump truck. As you are aware, staff's initial objective was to purchase a new one ton dump truck with the $8,500.00 in revenue sharing budgeted for a 3/4 ton park vehicle plus the $1,500.00 budgeted for the boom sprayer for the workmaster plus the Public Works Department has indicated that they would allocate an additional $4,500.00 - $5,000.00 that they had budgeted for the purchase of a small vehicle in the Building Inspection division. Since that time, staff has met with City Mechanic Schmidlin and Superintendent Kardell to discuss potential specifications for the purchase of a new one ton dump truck and we have secured two informal bids to determine whether or not a new truck would be feasible. As can be seen by t111 dLL 11c'd proposals, thc^ fea'a16117t, , of purchasing a new truck, as per our specifications, within the $15,000.00 allotment could easily be accomplished. In addition to pursuing the purchase of a new one ton dump truck, staff has followed up on a number of leads for used vehicles as per our past memo dated September 13, 1982. The three used vehicles that we looked at were at Rosedale Chevrolet, Granger's on Highway 65 and through a private party Mr. Robert Westland. All three vehicles were larger than staff has requested, as they have two ton chassis with full sized dump boxes except for the vehicle owned by Mr. Westland. The vehicle located on Central Avenue by Granger's is a 1976 Ford F-600 which apparently had recently been overhauled although they have no records indicat- ing such. The vehicle currently has 92,600 miles and would be in need of new tires all around with an asking price of $5,900.00. This vehicle would be a two ton dump truck similar to our existing vehicle with a full size dump box. The dump truck at Rosedale Chevrolet is a 1968 C-60 Chevrolet with over 100,000 miles and has a current asking price of $3,000 - $4,000. Both vehicles, as can be noted by the mileage, have been used extensively and would be almost identical vehicles to the city's existing two ton dump truck. Mr. Westland is selling a 1978 Chevrolet two ton dump truck with a four -speed manual transmission and two speed rear axle which has a contractor's dump box with sides that flip down which would be more ideal for the type of vehicle the city is looking for. The contractor's box is 12 feet in length and the vehicle has approximately 42,000 miles. Mr. Westland is asking $10,000.00 for his particular vehicle. Again, although this dump truck has the type of con- tractor box staff would be specing, the two ton chassis is twice as large as would be needed. It should be noted here that the major reason staff has requested a one ton dump truck with a contractor's box is for what we would define as the in between chores or tasks that a Public Works Department has, i.e. dumping trash on a weekly basis, picking up sand and ag lime in the one - two ton range, moving playground equipment, transporting people and generally used as an all around city vehicle. We would envision that the vehicle would be used on a daily basis -2- rather than the infrequent use that the current dump truck gets as it would become the city park division's second fleet vehicle. We currently have two Pickup trucks and the addition of the proposed one ton dump truck would be replacing old number 315 which is a 1972 Chevrolet 112 ton park pickup truck the division is urrentusing, since the second park vehicle no. 417 was sold fall of 1981.One of the major differences that staff envisions between a one ton and two ton chassis dump truck would be the gas mileage which would range from a low of four to five miles per gallon for a two ton full size dump truck to approx- imately twelve to fourteen miles per gallri for a one ton contractor box dump truck. The difference at today's gas prices of $1.15 - $1.20 per gallon of ten miles per gallon could prove to be quite substantial as we envision using this vehicle on a daily basis. Staff has attached a copy of specifications regarding the purchase of a one ton dump truck and would request direction as to how the council would like to in 1983.reShould9youehavepossible angeustions,purchase of an adioal new or feel free ton ncontact staffdatehicle extention no. 41. BOWS11 cc: Mr. Gary Kardell, Superintendent of Public Works Mr. Dick Schmidlin, City Mechanic 17J A DOYFR FORD TRUCKS INC. '.'al I h 1 Wudar 1114. 111 SI I 14111111 IhSI 1 It 1 II LA:a I N I II MY(1111IIII 1 Lll 9a�z a°?C -�' It'//Jv�r/��ti S . Ping1wset Ihn Ivad oll it Iha Inpeol......... 11, L:. I . RAN1 Y The Pu1rlw+vt allu-m put all ..... I....... I......• ... v Mlluavr .I:IIL•L•IIItsil nn Ihx ful,!v, I .y ....1 I'. . a umatisv. L. a vor of a lime sale, the 11.:.I. r .h A .. d . ..nL.Jn .rui WIIIIAI 11:llvicen IOo I'In.h.4'.....1 .I. 1'...... . Putdlmnt is not heshv iusumd against Iwm, 1, . •e.nu.. Iq ... . . hug,p.n ow,sl.tp ofupvomlun ul nny v. it, it R.., it r. :.,:. TRADE IN INFORMATION LIMITED WARRANTY 1IIII'It Lu sold L•.r I....,u:..:. u1 Ihv '1 .. ....... m n..:m11nA1• u... rb,..n•lirr n.:i llryr .SNllp", ..I .n., I..bllily in conrrtc• this •,Ah-j In I1O • ,..,.r •. ... n,.uly Ihn huve, I I I . r a r., Ihn �..lu. NO DEALER WARRANTY .. it, ia.plivll .: b..il a pop, %,•. This •'.II1 .A IL.•hyar r .. • 11 r,:span. • ..:,. ,.., w(wo :. ........... „ . Ilu .nlu. ADDITIONAL TERMS rgbhrn l'.11.1 nvdV. ITEN CHEVROLET CO.—11'IMCKVILLM, U.S.A. %11 6701 BROOKLYN BOULEVARD, BROOKLYN CEWEII, M. 55429 1'2 . a PHONE: (612) 56 1 1-9220 .Lv ) . . . ........... .... ... .. . . .. ........ .... .. .......... Addrees................................... ...... ... ...... Tho following is a quote oil a 1,111-10 Cal, to Axle .. ............................ WITII 11JUCI-l' 1111EIANDOWN AS l"ll-LOWN: ........... FACTORY LIST PRICE: . ... ..... Federal Excise Tax (Factor W-11) $ Freight..................................... .... .. . ...... F. . .. ................... Dealer DMI ............................. ... . 7 OPTION NO, ...................... ........ I ......... Transinisslon (If Not .............. ................... Ellgillo .......................737) ....... ......................... ........... ... rulint—AXIii ...... ..... s 1 P . v .... ..... I / .............................................. ............... �Le............ . ... .................................................. .................. JIM"Xio ........... .................... Tires (size) ........ ,%p .... . ..k!/.J. $.. . ............ .. ...... .. .................. 0 .................... ...............I................... /t....... . .N . ......... . . ..... ...... ............ . .. ................................ ................ . ................... ....... I ..................... ........ . .. . ... .. . . ... ......... ........ ............... ... . ............. ........................ ... . ...... . .. ..... ** . .......... ........... ..... 4-9 . . . ....... ... . ...... ................ .................... ..... .... 7" . ............ ... . ............. . ........... . . ....... A",) .............................................................. ...... ....... .... .............. .............. ................... ......... I ...... ... . ............... ............................................................................................ ............ .............. ................. ....... ............ . . .................... ............. .................................................... ........ I ...... I .. ........... . ...... . . ......... ... .... I .......... ................. ............. I ..... .......................................................... 4. ... / . ­ .................... ............................................................................. .............. . .. ........ - ...... . .... . . ... .......... ... ............................... ...................................... ................................................................................... , . ....... ..... .......... .. ..................... ....... //?.....Xzl............. . ................. .................... ........................ . P-I.e-,�,-: ..... e. .. - ... --j .... , ......................... ..... ....... I. .............................. .................................................................... ..(. �p........ * !�X .. , 1� ...... ..... .. .......... ......... . ......... ... .................................... ......... plc(eIWV? . ,(.:yZ .:.... ................ .. .......................................... .......... I ......... .............................. ............................................... / ..... . ... ...... ................ ................... ...................................... ... . ............... ....... I ........................................................ : .......... 0 ....................... ... ........................... ......... .. .... I ... I ......... .............................................................. I ....... I ........ ...................... . I .. .. ...... ". $ - .. ...... I ............ ........ . ........ ...... ........... . ....... ............................................................................................. .... ... ... .. .......... . . . . . .......... .. ................................ I C/ .. . ............................ ... ................... LIST PRICE COMM, E ............ ............. ......... .................. I .............................. LESS FLEET DISCOU SUBTOTAL .......................E........... ..... .. . . ..... .............................................. ESSTRADE IN NO. ......................... ....................... .... . .. ..... ... .......... — TOTALNET DID ............ ................................. ............. — x ...... .... .... .... .......... .... ........................ . . . .. ........ ..... .... I . ..... ............. .. Did rorqulrY No, ............................................. I .. ...... Ee N Ee 0 ,ITEN Cl IEVROLET CO. 17 -) -> -� I . b it 30 PL