HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packets - 1982/09/27CITY COUNCII. MEETING
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
September 27, 1982
7:30 p.m.
A G E N D A
1. Call to Order
2. Roll Call - Hodges, Forslund, Blanchard, Doty, McCarty
3. Approval of Minutes: September 13, 1982 (Regular Meeting)
(Received in your 9/20/82 packet.)
September 20, 1982 (Special Meeting)
4. Public Hearings - 7:40 p.m. - 1983 Revenue Sharing Budget
7:50 p.m. - 1983 General Fund Budget
5. Residents Requests and Comments from the Floor
------------------------------------------------
CITIZENS: BEFORE SPEAKING PLEASE GIVE YOUR
FULL NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE MINUTES
------------------------------------------------
6. Approval of Consent Agenda
ITEM A. Set Wetlands Subcommittee Meeting for September 27,
1982 at 7:00 p.m.
ITEM B. Approve Resolution No. 1497 Appointing Election Judges
and Establishing Salaries for the State General Election
ITEM C. Approve Resolution No. 1494 Approving Securities
Furnished by the First State Bank of New Brighton
ITEM D. Approve Resolution No. 1492 Approval of the Completion
of Development Agreement No. 81-47 for the First State
Bank of New Brighton and Release of the Letter of
Credit in the Amount of $77,035
ITEM E. Approve Resolution No. 1493 Approval of a Conditional
Use Permit for the Conversion of Edgewood Junior High
School to a Community Resn»rre Cc -tar
ITEM F. Licenses for Approval
ITEM G. Approve Resolution No. 1496 Approving Just and Correct
Claims Against City Funds
-continued-
AGENDA
September 27, 1982
Page Two
7. Second Reading and Adoption of ordinance No. 316 Amending
Municipal Code Chapter 40 Regarding Manufactured Iiomes
8. First Reading of Ordinance No. 318 Establishing Chapter 48 of
the Municipal Code Entitled "Wetlands Zoning" (Info on this
item will be handed out at the meeting.)
9. Consideration of Resolution No. 1495 Denying Development
Request by Dynamic Designers
10. Consideration of Application for Restaurant License and on -Sale
Liquor License Transfer from Richard and Marlene Povlitzki/dba
Povlitzki's on 10 to Donald W. Baker, Joseph M. Baker, and
Patrick A. Conroy, Jr.,/dba Gopher -Shamrock, Inc.
11. Consideration of the 1983 General and Forestry Funds Budgets
12. Consideration of the 1983 Revenue Sharing Budget
13. Consideration of the 1983 General and Forestry Funds Tax Levies
14. Consideration of the 1983 Bond and Interest Tax Levy
15. Consideration of Pinewood Drive Streetlight Petition
16. Report of Director of Public Works/Community Development
17. Report of Attorney
18. Report of Councilmembers
19. Report of Administrator
20. Adjournment
1
11
PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL 3
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA
Special Meeting
September 20, 1982
Mounds View City Hall
------- -- =2401 Hwy. 10, Mounds View City Hall
- �---------------------------------------------
The Mounds View City Council was called
to order at 7:07 p.m. on September 20,
1982 by Mayor McCarty.
Members present: McCarty, Blanchard, Doty, 2.
Forslund, Hodges
Others present: Clerk/Administrator Pauley,
Finance Director Brager, and Director of
Public Works/Community Development Johnson.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley presented reports 3,
prepared by staff regarding the availability
of funds for the purchase of used portable
classroom buildings which could be converted
by the City into park shelter buildings and
other information relating to the purchase
price for these buildings, the cost of site
preparation for the installation of the
buildings, and the heating systems contained
in those buildings. Staff also advised the
Council that it was the opinion of City
Attorney Richard Meyers that the purchase of
these buildings did not come under the require-
ments of Minnesota Law regarding the letting
of bids for purchases exceeding $10,000.
The Council discussed the advisability of
the purchase of these buildings, the present
problems the City is experiencing with vandalism
of municipal buildings, and the impacts this
purchase would have upon the status of the City,s
Special Capital Projects Fund.
Motion/Second: Doty/Hodges to authorize the
purchase and installation of three park, shelter
buildings not to exceed $24,OOO,with the funds
coming from the Special Capital Projects Fund,
and that the Recreation Activities Fund repay
the Special Capital Projects Fund from its year
end balances the amount expended by the Special
Capital Projects Fund for this item.
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
PURCHASE OF USED
CLASSROOM BUILDINGS
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Mounds View City Council September 20, 1952
Special Meeting Page Two
Motion/Second; Blanchard Forslund to 4. ADJOURNMENT
a jourrn at 7.29 p.m.
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Respectfully submitted,
Donald P. Pauley
Clerk -Administrator
`)
CONSENT AGENDA
September 27, 1982
The Consent Agenda is a technique designed to expedite handling of
routine and miscellaneous official business of the City Council.
The entire Agenda may be adopted by the Council in one motion. The
motion for adoption is non -debatable and must receive unanimous
approval. By request of any individual Councilmember, any item can
be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed upon the Regular Agenda
for debate.
ITEM A. Set Wetlands Subcommittee Meeting for September 27, 1982
at 7:00 p.m.
ITEM B. Adopt Resolution No. 1497 - Appointing Election Judges and
Establishing Salaries for the State General Election
ITEM C. Adopt Resolution No. 1494 - Approving Securities Furnished
by the First State Bank of New Brighton
ITEM D. Adopt Resolution No. 1492 - Approval of the Completion
of Development Agreement No. 81-47 for the First State Bank
of New Brighton and Release of the Letter of Credit in the
Amount of $77,035
ITEM E. Adopt Resolution No. 1493 - Approval of a Conditional Use
Permit for the Conversion of Edgewood Junior High School to
a Community Resource Center
ITEM F. Licenses for Approval
General - Expire 6/30/83
Mi1T ton L. Johnson Roofing & Sheet Metal Company - Renewal
Timberlane Homes, Inc. - Renewal
Kraus -Anderson Building Company - New
Heating & Air Conditioning - Expire 6/30/83
Suburban Air Conditioning Co. - Renewal
Total Energy Heating & Cooling - Renewal
Sewer and Water
Webster Co., Inc. - New
ITEM G. Adopt Resolution No. 1496 - Approving Just and Correct
Claims Against City Funds
L
n
RESOLUTION NO. 1497
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION APPOINTING ELECTION JUDGES AND ESTABLISHING
SALARIES FOR THE STATE GENERAL ELECTION
WHEREAS, the City of Mounds View is required by State law to
hold a General Election on November 2, 1982; and
WHEREAS, the City is further required to appoint election
judges who will be responsible for conducting the election under the
guidance of the City Clerk -Administrator.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the
City of Mounds View hereby appoints election judges for the State
General Election on November 2, 1982 as indicated on the attached
listing.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the salaries for election judges
shall be as follows:
ATTEST:
(SEAL)
Precinct Chairperson $4.00/hour
Precinct Election Judge $3.35/hour
Counting Center Judge $4.00/hour
Adopted this 27th day of September, 1982.
Mayor
Clerk -A ministrator
r~ f� f r
CITY OFF ANDS VIEW
PRECINCT NO. 1
CHAIR
Janet Strauss
IR
7830
Eastwood Rd.
55432
786-2583
JUDGES
Marilyn Brick
IR
8280
Sunnyside Rd.
55432
784-4794
Marcia Pajak
IR
8415
Fairchild Ave.
55432
786-5113
Shirley Buntrock
IR
8045
Greenwood Dr.
55432
786-7294
Sharon Moracco
DFL
8335
Fairchild Ave.
55432
786-6823
Mary Krusell
DFL
7840
Long Lake Rd.
55432
784-5754
Bill Frits
DFL
8072
Long Lake Rd.
55432
784-2808
Barb Kavanaugh
DFL
7956
Red Oak Dr.
55432
786-9533
PRECINCT
NO. 2
CHAIR
Jean Johnson
DFL
2225
Hillview Rd.
55112
784-8698
JUDGES
Betty Piehowski
DFL
2259
Pinewood Dr.
55112
784-5373
Mary Preciado
DFL
8030
Long Lake Rd.
55432
784-1577
Tom Dreshar
DFL
2508
Hillview Rd.
55432
784-8961
Vicki Crowe
IR
8145
Long Lake Rd.
55432
784-9237
Judy Petersen
IR
5562
St. Stephens St.
55112
786-2194
Cheryl Robinson
IR
2104
Rustad Lane
55112
784-7759
LaVonne Olson
IR
2215
Pinewood Dr.
55112
784-5209
PRECINCT NO. 3
CHAIR Kathy Mac Runnels
IR
7670
Knol.lwood Dr.
55432
786-6091
JUDGES Pat Coffey
IR
2757
Hillview Rd.
55432
786-4490
Mary Schroeder
IR
8051
Eastwood Rd.
55432
786-5623
Noel Samuelson
IR
7765
Spring Lake Rd.
55432
786-5142
Marian Winther
DFL
2801
Woodcrest Dr.
55432
784-3196
Roy Nelson
DFL
2901
Springview Lane
55432
784-5764
Dorothy Willhaus
DFL
5135
Bona Road
55112
786-3052
Delane Erickson
DFL
5319
St. Stephens St.
55112
784-4084
PRECINCT NO. 4
CHAIR Pauline Stauner
DFL
2454
County Road H-2
55112
786-1151
JUDGES Mary Bixler
DFL
2235
County Road H-2
55112
784-8250
Anne Bendt
DFL
5392
Quincy St.
55112
784-7157
Helen Ruzynski
DFL
5267
Irondale Rd.
55112
784-3899
Lili Ripley
IR
2432
Clearview Ave.
55112
786-4693
Robert Zimmer
IR
5468
Jackson Dr.
55112
786-6088
7everly Guider
IR
5219
"onnell Dr.
55112
7110
1 sabelle Wille
IR
7911
ing Lake Rd.
55432
784
COUNTERS
Marvalyn Koenker
Josephine Baker
Marvin Johnson
Ralph Hanggi
Joyce Brown
Murial Holmquist
Virqinia Pogainis
Lea Burggraff
CITY OF !h. JS VIEW
DFL
2317
Hillview Rd.
55112
784-7104
DFL
2324
Hillview Rd.
55112
222-6691 (work)
DFL
8010
Long Lake Rd.
55432
784-2696
DFL
2475
Woodale Dr.
55112
784-5646
IR
8240
Red Oak Dr.
55432
784-7922
IR
7945
Sunnyside Rd.
55432
784-8984
IR
8290
Spring Lake Rd.
55432
786-7228
IR
2932
Springview Lane
55432
784-4946
a
1' ✓
qL
TO: Mayor S Council
FROM: Finance Director -Treasurer Brager
DATE: September 21, 1982
RE: PROPOSED RESOLUTION ACCEPTING A PLEDGE OF SECURITIES
Attached is a proposed resolution accepting a pledge of securities
from the First State Bank of New Brighton in the amount of
$2,690,000.00. The bank, is proposing deletion and substitution of
pledged securities. This is quite common and I recommend adoption
of the resolution.
DB/ds
Attachment
RESOLUTION NO. 1494
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION APPROVING SECURITIES FURNISHED BY THE FIRST
STATE BANK OF NEW BRIGHTON
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Mounds View has
designated the First State Bank of New Brighton as a depository
Of city funds; and
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes 118.01 require that a municipal
depository provide securities for collateral; and
WHEREAS, the First State Bank of New Brighton has proposed
deletion of the following security from being pledged as collateral,
and
amount description maturity
r $300,000.00 U.S. Treasury Note 09-30-82
WHEREAS, the First State Bank of New Brighton pledges the
following additional securities;
amount description maturity
$300,000.00 U.S. Treasury Note 03-31-84
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the
City of Mounds View authorizes its Clerk -Administrator to approve
and accept the securities provided by the First State Bank of New
Brighton in Lhe amount of $2,690,000 as listed on the attached
document labeled Exhibit A.
ATTEST:
(SEAL)
Adopted this 27th day of September 1982.
Mayor
Clerk -Administrator
• No. 1032—AWpment or Semtllle, to Un of Bend by Public ntCodmtrtL Exhibit A 1l illndhvl, Cu., >Ilnnrq=db _
ElItIttl All lni Jlirnr Vrritrutti. 'I'hat._......First State Bank of New Brighton
in consideraron of its designation as a depository of public funds
as hereinafter specified, hereby assigns, transfers, and sets over to
t........... ........ ................
__..____..._...�__.._____
those certain securities described as follows, to -wit:
$ 500,000
Federal Home Loan Banks
Due:
12-27-82
17-4
300,000
U. S. Treasury Notes
Due:
1-31-83
17-4
225,000
U. S. Treasury Notes
Due:
5-31-83
17-4
500,000
Federal Home Loan Banks
Due:
3-25-83
17-4
300,000
U. S. Treasury Notes
Due:
3-31-84
17-4
300,000
Federal National Mortgage Assn.
Due:
10-13-87
17-2
25,000
Cosmos, Mn. GO
Due:
9-1-83
17-2
40,000
Sarpy Co., Neb. SID 18 Echo Hill
Due:
12-15-85
17-4
25,000
Isle, Mn. ISD #473 GO Schl. Bldg.
Due:
3-1-88
17-2
25,000
Duluth, Mn. ISD #709 GO
Due:
6-1-88
17-4
I 20,000
Martin County, Mn. GO Drainage
Due:
1-1-90
17-4
50,000
Dade County, Florida
Due:
4-1-90
17-4
50,000
City of New Brighton, Mn. GO Water
Due:
2-1-91
22-1
25,000
Rice Lake, WI Municipal Bldg.
Due:
4-1-91
17-4
50,000
Lake City, MN. GO
Due:
5-1-91
22-1
25,000
Lakeville, MN. GO
Due:
2-1-93
22-1
50,000
Lonsdale, MN. Go
Due:
2-1-93
22-1
50,000
Norwood Young America, MN. ISD il109
Due:
2-1-93
22-1
30,000
Forest Lake, MN. GO
Due:
4-1-93
22-1
100,000
Plymouth, MN. GO
Due:
2-1-95
22-1
RESOLUTION NO. 1492
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
APPROVAL OF THE COMPLETION OF DEVELOPMENT
AGREEMENT NO. 81-47 FOR THE FIRST STATE BANK
OF NEW BRIGHTON AND RELEASE OF TIIE LETTER
OF CREDIT IN THE AMOUNT OF $77,035
WHEREAS, First State Bank of New Brighton was required by
Development Agreement No. 81-47 to provide a Letter of Credit in
the amount of $77,035; and
WHEREAS, the Letter of Creidt is required to insure that
the development is in accordance with the requirements as outlined
in Development Agreement No. 81-47; and
WHEREAS, all conditions and requirements pursuant to Develop-
ment Agreement No. 81-47 have been completedand fulfilled;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View City
Council approves the completion of the conditions and requirements '
in Development Agreement No. 81-47 and authorizes the release•bf the
Letter of Credit for $77,035 and the issuance of a Final Occugandy
for the First State Bank of New Brighton, Mounds View Office, located
at 2711 Highway 10;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mounds View City Council
authorizes a refund of the unused portion of the administrative fees
submitted.
ATTEST:
(SEAL)
Adopted this 20th day of September, 1982.
Mayor
Clerk -Administrator
c
RESOLUTION NO, 1493
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OE' MINNESOTA
APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR
THE CONVERSION OF EDGEWOOD JUNIOR HIGH
SCHOOL TO A COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER
WHEREAS, Mounds View School District has requested approval
to convert existing Edgewood Junior High School to a community
resource center; and
WHEREAS, the zoning for the school property is R-1, Single
Family Residential; and
WHEREAS, a community center is allowed by conditional use
permit in an R-1 zoned district; and
WHEREAS, the Mounds View Planning Commission has reviewed
this application and has adopted Resolution No. 57-82 recommending
approval with conditions; and
WHEREAS, such conditions relate to the potential need for•
additional on -site parking spaces;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View City
Council approves the conditional use permit for a community resource
center to be located in the existing Edgewood Junior High School
building with the condition that after a one-year period, should the
City determine that additional on -site parking spaces are necessary,
eighty-two (82) spaces will be constructed on the existing hard sur-
face area on the east side of the building and access to this lot
will be provided conforming to drawings dated June 29, 1982;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that 'the conditional use permit be
reviewed by the City on an annual basis to determine whether sufficient
parking spaces exist for the continued use as a community resource
center.
ATTEST;
(SEAL)
Adopted this 20th date of September, 1982.
Mayor
Clerk -A ministrator
IVP$,Ql,U9?0N NO,1496 1J-,6:
01TY OF MOIINI'L, Vll;t7
CUUN11Y OF 1M.,l?'i
:;I'A'IE (IF MINNI':;"O'I'A
AITROViNO JII,';I' AND GOplth.(:,r
CLAIMS AGAINST CITY FUAIA7
WIIIIlle 1, the City GnttltCI'I or
.,, :n:: 11tllMolald:: Vi.Mhwa::ol,❑ fill r:;uant to
:utl.horiia w t' 1,111. I'innucial tifl':tlrs of the City mid;
WHEREAS, 'I'll(, City Council ho:: rr:vir;x.d I,h,t cL,im:: nurnbern;
9 —
LhruuClt
10041
in Lhu nlnounl, ul'
73,989.29
J 812 _
throtgdt
17836 _
in 1,110 nmounl. nl' $
40,328.59
�
17837
through ti
17840
ht the amrault of ?
569.60
through v in I.ho :wh,nnL of •
1'0'1'AI, ,IMOUNT OF CIAIAU 114,887.48
and has found mid alnims to he ,just and enrreet; —
Oki. of any excoption)
NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved that the City Council of Mounds View
hereby approved the attached lists of claims dated
vote ayes Hayes by the
AT77ST;
higyor
(SEAL)
Clerk-AdmininLrator
IA*"*N
CHECK
17837
17838
17839
17840
AMOUNT
CLAIMANT
PURPOSE
$226.10
Chinese Lantern
gadabout
152.50
UMD - Glensheen
gadabout
171.00
Duluth Superior Excur,
gadabout
20.00
$5-60
Northside Christian
refund
CITY Of MOUNC'S VIEW
CH£r,Kf A H 0 U N T
017812
01781S
.017814
017815
017816
A C C O U N T, P A Y A$ L t
CLAIMANT
200.00
STATE
'R£A:,
61".72
SCOTT
KLINEK
352.56
GOPHER
AIHLTTIC SUPPLY
29222.28
STATE
TREA: - P E R A
29193.75
JCHN C
JJHN;O•;
109.44
HELS VAN-0-LL1E
500.00
BRUCE MOORE
500.00
JOSEPH L PILUH
131.00
MN RENAL;: ANCE FE; i IVAL
L00.00
C-HANHASSE14 DINNER THFATR
60.00
MHCC CONFERENrE
75.00
BETH GILLMAN
LAit O')•2tl-P2 PACT 1
0 S '.
SUPPLIE;, U1IL;IIES
SUPFLIES,CPLRATINI;
SUPPLI�S,CKWIN(
PTNSIUIIS
DMIN. CHARGE: Pt'AlLC
AHU-OTHER PR:?'r3!'r:NaL SERV
SUPPLIES, 8LL f,' +C' n;Is
PROGRAM IRSTIt ;ti ,
PROGRAM INSiRLCIC ;
SUPPLIES,OPE.RaTIN,f
SUPPLIES,OPC,MATIN4
CONFERENCES
PROGRAN INSIRUCTOi:
i5.00 RHYTHNAIR£, SUPPLIES,OPERATIN,
141.75 RAOISSON ARROWHEAD INN CONFTKENH..S
75.00 MINNESOTA M F 0 A
CONfEREA'CE:;
178.50 JANET MOODY PROGRAM INScRUCTOP`.
28,411.55 FIRST STATE DANK OF
SALARIES, F-GLLAP
— ANJ-:'ALARICJj FMPfPAR- T
29216.97 STATE TREAS - P E R A PENSICN;
100.00 DONALD BRACER SUPPLIES,CFFRATINC
1,877.25 STATE TREASURER PECION5
231.28 ICMA kr.TIREMENT CORP PENSIONS
69,75 G4tiY KAROELL TRAINING
4.78 CUNM.OF_TkAN;PORTATION SLPPLIE_,CPEHATIkG
40028.59 NECESSARY EXPENDITURES SINCE LAST COUNCIL FIETING
I
- - - --- ---- --,% _ 1.1
CITY OF MOUNDS VI: H A J L N I S P A Y A 6 L
CHECK* AMOUN r CLA IHA t:
009898
00959)
001300
009901
009902
019903
009904
009905
k
009906
n 009907
__009908
009909
009310
.. 009911
009912
009913
069914
009915
009916
+ 009917
009918
009919
rj. 009920
I".f' 0!-c'6-62 PA..
P U P. P O S E
2
9.36
AMERICAA LINEN SUPPLY CO
CLEAN ING-TO41 LS + RAGS
30,00
BRUCE ANDERSON
MEHOERSNIi'$
39.97
EARL f ANOEPSEN + ASSOC
SIJPPLI5-oIF41FIC CNTROL.______-
196.50
AGOA7.YHE MIDWEST
SATELLITE=
2P.90
OFISSHCNGCR APPLIANCE
SUPPLIES, BLCUS+! ND S
30012
OON4LO BRACER
CONFEItEACCI
ABO-HILEAGE
207*85
BRIGHTON VETERINARY HOSP
OTHCk PROFESSNNI! SERV.___—
72,00
CAPITAL ELECTRONICS
REPAIPS, EOUI?MEK
107,69
CHIPPEHA SPRINGS CORP
SUPPLIES 9CPCRITTI,
409.14
CONTRACT CLEANING
SUPPLIES, OLOGS+
AND -JANITOR SI'RVi e.
.94
_. COTTENs INC
SUPPLIES, VEP,.GLf
_
13,45
CROWN AUTO STORES
SUPPLIES, VEHiGLF
138.97
DATA LISPATCH INC
CCN-. SVCS., iELIVERY i
1#365,00
____DATA OPERATIONS, INC. _
_ CON1._SVCS., KEY PUKCH_
107,70
,OAVES SPORT SHOP
SUPPLIES90PERATING
59.90
FLESCH:. PAPER :ERVIC6�
RISC OFFICE SUPPLIES
41,00
GALLAGHER' SEkVILL INC
REFUSE. 60LLEf110H
35.00
GENEPATOR SPECIALTY CO
REPAIRS, EOUII'HERI
i
483.65
GOPHER ATHLE"IG SUPPLY
UUIFORH + CLOTHIMG
ANO-SUPPLIES,OPERATING
160.00
HAMELC RECRE4TION CU INC
SUPPLIES,CPE-IATINL
<;
40.80
HEALY L480RATORIES
O-HER_PROFES:IONAL SEU
1,316.25
JOHN C JOHNSON
ACH1N, CHARGES PAYAOLE.
_...
AND-OTPER PPOFESSIONA.L_S.E91_�_
72,71
LAYNE MINNESOTA CO
SUPPLLV's UTILITIES
„1
if
f
C I! Y ')F Hp Utli. '' VI r' H
CHECK* ANOUI. T
009921
009922
_009923
009924
009925
009926
009927
009928
009929
009930
009931
009932
009933
009934
009935
009936
A C C 0 L N T. P A Y A B L E
C L A I M A N T
27,266*19 METP,O WASTE. CONTROL CORM
L,A`E J�23-82 PAf,L 3
P U V P O S E
1!CTRO WAS;z CC'` t.OMM
13,20
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
OEPOSIT.; - HYbltMT
81.28
MOUNDS VItW CUR OWN HOWE
SUPPLIES,OPERN_C[yT-_ _._.
AND -SUPPLIES, P.LOG54GRHOS
AND -SUPPLIES, EQUIPMENT
A110-SUPPLIES, UTI.LITIES___
4.c
75,00
NF,PA
HFMHERSHIPS
192.43
N N DELL TELEPHONE CC
COMMUNICATION_- IELEPHONE�
156.50 -
NLN-9RIGHTON HONE-
SUPPLIES,- EQUipa"o-,T_..___
AND-SUPPLIES,OPERI-iING
ANO-SUFPLIES, UTILITIES
AND-;UPPLIES, OLD,,iGRNOS
ANO"EP., BLOCS + GROUNDS
_
223.51
NEW BRIGHTON HONE
SUPPLIES-,CPENATING_____
ANC -SUPPLIES, EOUIPMENT
AND- LPPLIES, VEhiCLE
-------..-- --__
__
ANO UPPL_IES,._fllUfS+GRN➢$_
AND -SUPPLIES, UTILITIES
277.40
NEW BRIGHTON HCWE
SUPPLIES,.OPERAT.ING.
1
AND -SUPPLIES, OLCGS+GRNOS
ANC -SUPPLIES, EQUIPMENT
ANO-SOFFL IES,_..51REM-
AND -SUPPLIES, UTILITIE$
"
115,00
NO LEYINGTON LANDSCAPING
SUPPLIES,..HLOGStGPNOS
114.43
NOPTHFRr4 BOLT r TOOL CC
SUPPLIES, EOUTPHENT
5,972.75
NORIHtRtt `TA'E; PONFk CO
CLECiRICITY
ANC -NATURAL GAS
ANO-STREET_ LIGHTS__
AND -TRAFFIC SIGNA:.S - ELECT
3,9e1.53
NORTNE�N �TATFS_POFE_R
ELECTRICLiY
AND -NATURAL GAS
89.37
NORTHERN STATES POWER
ELECTkICI TY
23.L0
P:PSI COLA BOTTLING CO
P, F.' F U N C
55.:0
PI TNEY BOWES INC
—^
POSTAGE
47,V0
PRECISION BUS SYST INC
REPAIRS,
i
CITY OF MI:UNU� VIEW A C C 0 U N T S P A Y A B L E
CHECKA M 0 U1+T C LA IMA NT
009937 39174.64
'i
009938
35.00
9�-
009939
35.80
;'
009940
60.00
009941
147.94
!`.-609942
60.00
'i
009943
62.26
009944
89398,93
E009945
450.42
_009946 137.47
009947 __ __ 69973458
009948 94.88
009949 10.00
009950 100* 00
C00951 69.99
009952 3,564.51
DATE 09-28-82 PAC".
P U P f' 0 j t
4
RAMSEY COUNTY TREASURER
PEPAIRSs U71LITI
AND -PRINTING
ANO-OTHER PROF"" ICNAL
SERI
ANO-CONT. SVCS., FAMSEY
CN!
RE CY CO
CEJRI. REMOVAL
i s
ROAU RUNNER PARCEL :TER
CONT. SVCS., CELIVERY.__�<
PAhICLA S POSE
+•
SALARIES TIME
S + T OFFICE PRODUCTS
HISC OFFICE SUPPLIES
i
MARY SAARION
HEMOERSHIPS
"
SAUNO£RS-THdLOEN + ASSOC
OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERV
;NORTH ELLIOT! AND
OTHER PROFESSIU'IA' E•RV
SMITH LUMBER CO
SUPPLIES+ 9LOL54CPHUS..
_._ _. • .
ANO-SUPPLIES9 E6UIPMENT
i
jI;YOERS_0_F'•UG `.'TOPEo
YI;C_OFFICE
ANO-SUFFLIESrOPERATING
d
SPRING LK PARK FIRE DEPT
-GRANTS _t.SUB ED1ES_._____
SPRING LAKE PARK LUMBER
SUPPLIES9 OLOGS+GRNDS
ST PAUL BOOK+STATIONERY
FESTIVITIES COMMISSION
,
T + S TROPHIES
___._SUPPLIES+OPERATING-________
e
TAPGE.T
MISC OFFICE _.JPFLIES
='
_
TE_SMAN OIL COj
INVENTORY
009953 10.03 H R TOLL_CDMPANY_
009954 81.00 TWAN;>CONT_DROKERS.INC__..._
009955 82.60 Ut.ITOG_RENTALS..SYSTEM
009956 lbl.70 VCNBURG TIRE CO
SUPPLIES+OPERATIAG
ANO-RENTAL9 L:UIPHENT
ANO-TICKETS + ,REGISTRATIOt
UNIFORMS t_CLUtAIhG
SUPPLIES. VEH(;LE
(_c1iY OF MOUNDS VILM
CHECK* A M O U N T
009957 19190.1h
84.16
WILCOX PAPER COMPANY
100.00
GEORGE ANORL'S
50.00
CRAIG BYSTEDT
120,00
KATIE FOLEY
129,00
EO GIBSON
25.00
MARLFNt GIBSON
125.00
WILLIAM MAHN
100.00 -
KEVIN MORIN -.
226.80
CCANNA MORTENEON
200.00
MIKE OCONNOR
_50,00 ..
_RAY G PAVLOVSKIS
187.50
NEIL TOBIASON
21.75
ICMA RETIREMENT CORP
5.7.5
GESTETN£R CORPORATION
170.50
05N COFP
190.u0
THE MAC GILLIS t GIBOS
28.06
COUNTRY CLUB MARKET
430.17
JAMES M FREEBERG
12.00
JOHN BLACK
15.GO
MP./MRS LEO BLANCHARD
8. UO
LOREII A UHASSARD
9.95 H F. ERICKSON CONP414Y I11C
2iS.98 L f A PRODUCTS OF MINN
A C C O L N T 5 P I; Y A a L E.
C L A I M A N I'
CITY OF WHITE BEAR LAKE '- ALARiESr REGIIA.,
AI;C-PENSIONS
AGO-F,I,C,A. -
Lr;(`-lgRKCRS ';f'F ._A1ION
MIMEC SLFFLIE.'
PPOGr?AM INSTPLCTO 5 ---_-,-_—
PROGRAM INSTRUCTIRS
PROGRAH INSTP"V; • ;
PROGRAM.-INSTPUG10i';
PFOGRAM INSTRLC V^
FFOGRAN INSTF'uflri ; - - .r1,�
PROGRAM INSTF'uC.t01SW:lab
PROGRAM INST�Lf,l:t' S
PROGRAP INSTRU,ICI;PROGRAM.INSTRUCJOPSPPOGRAH INSTRUCTORS
BOOKS f PERIODICALSs
MIMEQ-SUPPLIES-_.
SUP PLIESYUPERATINC a
SUPPLIESr EOUTFM!.�i - --.
Y.V VI
- _SUPP.LIES,CFERATINC _
REP.* BLOCS r GRCUND3 A
REFUhD a
tVPPLIESOPERA' It•t IF
R E F U N i �•
a
SUPPLIESr E9U1_'M11T
d•
n
REPAIRS, E4L1P:1EN
n
----._.-----------L
v
I•
DATE 09-l.8-82 rA; 5
P U R F 0 S I
CITY OF MOUNT
VIER
A C C 0 U N T P A Y A O L E
CHECK* A M
0 U14 T
C LA I M A N T
009981
20.00
JUDY LEW
009982
22,00
METROPCLIIAN OFFICE
_A09983
12,00
TATUM MILLER.
009984
56, 80
NO RTIIERN PIPELINE
009985
20.00
MARGE ROELLER
—009986
25.00
PEGyY.SEVERSUN
009987
8.00
MYRTLE SHERBROOKE
069988
15.00
CLARENCE SCHER
—009989
74.90
ST_PAUL STAMP WORKS INC
009990
27,98
STERLING PRODUCTS
609991
30,00
SUPERIOR CONTRACTORS 114C
_009992 _ _
_230,00
EL HARKETING
009993
7.29
FRASER HARDWARE
009994
18.01
JI'5EPHINE BAKER
_00999,,
60,37
ANNE UEND.T.-
60,37 MARY BIXLEP.
33,00
LEA NARIE OURGGRAFF
61,25__-__MA.RILYN-HICK
._.-__..-.
31000
JOYCE J BROWN
61.25
SHIRLEY L OUNTROCK
59950 _
PATRICIA CCFFEY
99.50
VICTORIA CROKE
59,511
T110MAS ORESHAR
59,50..
CC LANE ERICKSON
61.25
HILLIAN FRrTS
PATE 09-28-82 PAGE
6 'li
P U R P
1�
R E F U N D
M1SC OFFICE Su I"L'1.5
RE_F040 _
OEPOSIIS - HY[FAt•
P E FUND ----
R E FUN-.0 —_
R E F U Tf 0
SUF FLI ES,OPF,R AT It. .
SUFPLIES,CPEFATIF
SUPPLIEi OPERATI'
k C F U N 0
CTHE* PR0FE5-z_I0j,AL _aER.V—
SUPPLIEigCPERATIFC
SALARIES,TEIIP+PART TIME
SALARIE59'EMPIM '_LIME
SALARIES,TEMF+PART TIME
SALARIES,TE'H'+PANT TIME
.`. Al AR I c c_r G II P+PERt TTNF_
SALARIES, IEMP+PAR' TIME
SALt.'IES,TEMP+PAPI TIME
AL01F.SEML#PAR. TIME_—�
;ALAPIES,TEMP+PAR; TIME
SPLAI:IES,TEMP+PART TIME
:ALARIES,'LHP+PAR' TIME
SALAP.IES,IEMP+d,FT TIME
11
II
•1
,n
CITY OF MCUNOS VIEW A C C C L r; T" 1' A Y A U L
CHECK*
,t
s>
010006
010007
i _010008
010009
010010
0.10011
010012
010013
4_
t Of-LO-84 PALE 7
A M O U L' T C L A I M A N T P U R P O t F
r 010015
010016
_ 010a17____.
010018
010019
_ O10020
69,37
OLVrFLY GULOER
31.u0
RALPH HANGGI
21.00
MURIEL HOLMOUJsT
75.00
Jf'AN JOHNSON
21. C.0
MA RVIN JOHNS ON
61,25
OARJARA C KAVANAUGH
37.00
HARVALYN KOENKER
61.25
MARY C KRUSELL
75.00
KATHLEEN MACRUNNLL5
61.25
SHARRON 0 MORACCO
59.50
ROY NELSON
5.9.50_
__.LAVONNF OLSON
61.25
MARCIA PAJAK
59.50
BE -Ty PIEHOHSKI
_ _.18400
VIRGINIA PCGAINI;
59.50
MARY L PRECIAOO
60.37
LILI 5IGRIL RIPLEY
61.25
,NER,YL L �10I 'ON
60.37
HELEN RUZYNSKI
59.50
NOEL SAMUEI.SON
59@50_..
MAP,Y_JO 5CHP,CELER
78.00
PAULINE STAUNEB
84.00
JANET 'STRAUS:
60,37
I5ABELLE NILLE
59,50
DOROTHY HILLHAUS
SALARIES,TEHP#PA4T
TIME
SALAF.IES,TEKt'#PAFT
TIME
;ALAFTE;,TI;KP.PA.'I
TIME ._..__.
SALAI'IES,TEMP,PARI
TIME
'k
;ALARIE„TEyP,PAR
TIME
SALARIES, TENIP,PA•;
TIHE--_---___--_
SALARIES,TF.YP,PAR
TIME
:ALAPIFS',Ii:'lPrpa
rIME -�
SALAPIES,IErP#PA, T
TIME_.—_
SALAP,IES,TEHP#PA-*
TIME
SALARIES,T[MPrPAu
TIME - —
SALARILS,IEMr•rPARI
TINE_
SALARIESITEMP ,PART
TIME
SALARIES,TEMP:PART TIME
SALARIES, TENPD_p.T TIME___
SALARIES ,TEMP#PART TIME
SALAPIES,TEMP+PAN ;I4E
SALARIES,TEYP+PAFi
SALARIES,TEHPFPA+:1 TIME
SALARIES,TEMP+PA;t TIME
SALARIES,1FMP+P-AA1 TIME_.____
SALARIES,TEMP#PARr TIME
SALARIES,IF.MP,PAI TIME
�ALAPIES, TEMFWAr TIME_.._.__.___
SALA:TES,IEMPOAF1 TIME
11
•
lel CITY OF (ILJ4,. VI, M
�;ii CHILY,� A h 0 U i. T
C C: tl U' '2 P A Y A F L
f, L A I t< A Id I
010031
59.50
HARIAN NINTMFr
010032
60.37
RONF.RT ZIMMER
010033
5.00
NORTH$(UE CHRISTIAN
010034
59.50
JUDY PETERSEN
010035
10.00
DIANNE OAYTON
010036
20,00
LINDA LYN[
010037
12.00
GLAIR PETERSON
010038
40.00
CANA PONERLEAU
_010039
35,40
REPUBLIC AIRLINES INC
010040
4,20
ST PAUL RENT ALL
010041
12,00
JACKIE SHENSON
144
739989.29
CHECKS_-W?ITTEN
TOTAL OF
L67 CHECKS TOTAL
1149317.88
CATE 09-28.82 PAGI 8
P U R F U S E
SA LAkIES,IEMP+Put T1HE '
;ALAR1ES,iEHPrP4,: TIME
P, F. F U h C
SALARIES, EMP►PA?I TIME. "
R E F U N C
9f. F UN.L
R E F U 11 G�. W X
PROGRAM 1N;.TRUCTORS
SLPPLTES70PER1,TINC
SUPPLIES, UTILI"I.,;
P E F U N 0
"c/ ," 7
ORDINANCE NO. 316
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
AMENDING THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF MOUNDS VIEW
BY AMENDING CHAPTER 40.02, ZONING, RULES AND
DEFINITIONS, AND CHAPTER 40.06, ZONING, AREA
AND BUILDING SIZE REGULATIONS
The Council of the City of Mounds View does hereby ordain:
SECTION I. Chapter 40.02, Subdivision B, DEFINITIONS, is hereby
amended by adding the following new paragraph and renumbering and
rearranging all paragraphs of Chapter 40.02, Subdivision B, into
alphabetical order:
(68) Manufactured Home. A manufactured home is one that is
defined by Minnesota Statutes, 327.
SECTION II. Chapter 40.06. Area and Building Size Regulations
shall be amended by adding the following:
Subd. F Building Design Standards.
(1) The length of all residential structures in R-1 zones
shall not exceed three (3) times the width, excluding
garage.
(2) A permanent foundation of concrete, concrete block,
or wood and anchoring system as approved by the
Uniform Building Code, Chapter 29, is required for
all P,-1 residential structures with frost footings of
at least a 42-inch depth below grade.
(3) All residential structures in R-1 zones, including
manufactured homes, must comply with the State Building
Code for single family homes.
(4) All manufactured homes shall have available for inspec-
tion, manufacturer's instructions specifying how said
home is to be situated on a permanent foundation.
(5) Unless located in a designated mobile home park, all
mobile homes or manufactured homes shall comply with the
provisions of this Code, as amended from time to time.
SECTION III. This ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after
the date of its publication.
Ordinance No. 316
Page 2
Read by the Council of the City of Mounds View on the day of
1982.
Read and'passed by the Council of the City of Mounds View this
day of 1982.
ATTEST;
(SEAL)
Mayor
Clerk -A ministrator
1
1
11
/i v
RICHARD MEYERS, P
ATTOIINr..Y AT LAW
H!r MUM ♦Vr MYr
8T. PAUL, MINNESOTA 00112
Ir121 mmss
SeptonbLr 22, 1902
Mounds View City Council
2401 highway 10
Mounds View, Minnesota 55112
Attention: Donald F. Pauley, Clerk -,Administrator
Gentlemen:
Enclosed please find a Memorandum prepared by me dated May 15,
1978, whichdiscusses the relationship between the comprehensive plan
and the zoning ordinances in force in the City. You will note that
I urge the City to take steps to have the zoning ordinance conform
to the comprehensive plan. I concluded that it is the zoning ordinances
that regulate the use of property and that the comprehensive land use
plan will not regulate the use of property until the zoning ordinances
implement said plan. This was my opinion in 1978 and it is still my
opinion,
Yours truly, /
Richard iteye'rs
hM/ew
Enc.
01
MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: City Attorney Richard Meyers
DATE: September 23, 1982
SUBJECT: CHAPTER 48 - WETLANDS
The proposed Chapter 48 is one of several official controls to
be adopted by the City, and the authority for such controls is
under its general police power to protect the public health,
safety, and welfare of the community. This general power has
long been recognized by the courts.
The City will be regulating the use of property, but will not
be acquiring property rights or rights of ownership.
The State has several statutes relating to water management,
wetlands, and public waters.
M.S. 105 defines wetlands and indicates that the state has adminis-
tration over the use, allocation, and control of wetlands in
excess of 2-1/2 acres or more (in the City). In that statute
the City can establish restrictions upon public access to any
wetlands from city or county roads abutting wetlands.
M.S. 473.879 contemplates a Water Management Plan, authorizing
local official controls and provides that the local comprehensive
plan be amended to reflect such controls. It also provides for
review and approval by the Rice Creek Watershed District for
consistency.
M.S. 462.352 provides for official controls by virtue of zoning
regulations. It provides for a comprehensive plan (462.355)
and for plan effectuations (462.357). Subdivision controls are
authorized (462.358) and a public facilities plan can be implemented
by a major thoroughfare plan and a community facilities plan
(462.359).
To implement the Wetlands Ordinance as a zoning control then the
provisions of 462.357 should be followed (public hearing, after
10 days published notice - mailed notice not necessary if over five
acres of land or more are involved), amendment of the comprehensive
plan to conform to the official control (see memo on Rochester
Association's case).
If the Council intends to adopt Chapter 48 as a police power
regulation then the usual procedure for adopting ordinances should
be followed (two readings, publication, and no formal hearings).
1
The most conservative approach would be to follow the zoning ordinance
procedure, providing for regulation of wetlands by the zoning
regulation approach, requiring Planning Commission processes.
If the Planning Commission has already approved the ordinance
the Council can proceed. If the ordinance is Council originated
then it should be submitted to the Planning Commission for review
and approval (462.357, Subd. 4).
RM/pf
1
J
I
m
9
!"t:;UliA?;DGb!
The following is a ;amrorandu;; relative to the Rochester
Association, of xoitjhborhoods v. City of Rochester and Others.
This case relate::; to rozcn in%, comprohonsive plan and conditional
usa permit considurations.
2S
Tile City of iochester (City) rezoned a 1.18 acre tract of
land from one-f aiily use and lo4.t density residential to high density
residential to permit the building of a six -story 49 unit condominium
apartment building on the land. The Rochester Association of Neighbor-
hoods (the Association), a group of neighboring property owners, con-
tend that the rezoning was presumptively invalid as a "quasi-judicial
act" not supported by the council with written findings of fact upon
substantial evidence; and that even if it was a legislative act, the
rezoning was arbitrary and capricious because it was inconsistent
with the City's land use plan and without reasonable relation to the
health, safety and welfare of the coirsnunity; and that the ordinance
was invalid "spot zoning".
The trial court upheld the City's rezoning and the Association -
appealed the decision to the Minnesota Supreme Court. The Minnesota
Supreme Court upheld the trial court and held that the City's ordinance
was a valid exercise of the municipality's delegated legislative power
and, upon the record presented, was neither proven to be without
reasonable relation to the public health, safety, and welfare nor to
be invalid as spot zoning.
The land in question was bounded by single-family houses,
low density multiple family dwellings, a 29 unit apartment building,
and a 35 unit condominium. Across the street was a parcel of vacant
land zoned "institutional" and was owned by the Mayo Clinic. Visible
from the rezoned tract are the Mayo Clinic Complex Buildings located
one block north and one block east and another high rise condominium
two blocks array.
to the ity council
The plannin(j CGf :3l'u 4 4/i tlt thU cityland use
that the rezonlltg bu "'On 4 4J incol�ll il:iu .t
r� i ;:Cl.l use on the subject
plan, which callud for lots du;U.i•' rs recommenda-
property.
Tito council rejected the ;,�,n;,ing cor�mission
council gave no written
tion and rezoned the property to R '• ';hc
reasons orfllldings 5U?pOr t1rdJ �l:v ru Uning, TFiU CGL 1Ci1's mir,utts
iro council nerber1 belieVOd the proposed condo
indicated that tminium
was needed to serve the city's expanded housing requirements. Council
members stated that the property would be an ideal site since it was I
located within throe blocks of the central business district, and
since high donsity residential uses alreadY across two streets from
the property would be compatible with the proposed condominium and
Property for any other use unlike'
made development of the subject pro p
fire council amended its land use
After the rezonin action was taken,
lan to conform to the rezoninq• public hearings and protested
The Association appeared at the
the rezoning and sued the City'
RECISION between an
1, The court spent some time on distinguishing
islative act. If the
administrative or quasi-judicial ac6 or a leg'
act by the council was found to be administrative, then the municipal -
act orting the ordinance as a valid
.ty would. have the burden of supp
by findings of fact based upon sub -
exercise of the police power U(
that
n a
stantial evidence. The Minnesota Supreme Court heft acts inea leg;r,
municipality adopts or amends a zoning ordinance,
s delegated police powers. As a legisl�,...-�
islative capAcity under it rove that
act, a zoning or rezoning must be upheld unless opponents p
the classification is unsupp
orted by any rational basis related to . I.;.
romoting tba public health, safety, morals or general welfare, or
p without compensation.
that the classification amounts to a taking a of review in cases
The Supreme Court states that its narrow JCOp legislative body (the
of this ityp
e reflects a policy decision that a leg'
which zoning classifications best sere
council) can best determine
-2-
tae )L',11C }IQl:.4ie. The CO'urt Stated,
":?va;, '.r:•a.'e tha reasonaLleress of a zoning ordinance
is de'aaL;b;.e, or 4ore there ara conflicting opinions
ns LO C:,_ ,.e; i.rabi?. l.tV of the restrictions it imposes
i:i pat :'unction of the courts to inter-
fere L;;o lcc:islative discretion on such issues,"
:he i,tisOCii,L' ,•ued ' : is rule of
wo:' �=, ti:a� t: law does not apply
Lo SpeC> al sc, 4,cr:cit :;w S>prame CcurL cited the Z ylka case and
said,
"ile adc;pted tL'a ru10 that where a special use conform-
ing wieh the zoning ordinance is requested, a city
council's denial of a special use permit to a single
land owner is proved prima facie,arbitrary and un-
reasonable if it is shown'Lhat the council failed to
support its action by written findings of substantial
evidence showing the use inpermissible under the
Permit standards o_ the ordinance."
The ssociation in this case asked the Supreme Court to rule
that zoning amendments be reviewed under a like standard and suggest
that the only distinction batsaeen special use permits and the rezon-
ing is the label "rezoning". The Supreme Court did not agree and
said as follows:
"While an arendment of the zoning ordinance can permit
particular property to be used in a manner formerly
forbidden by the: ordinance, 'a special use provision
merely pormits property, within the discretion of the
governing body, to be used in a manner expressly
authorizud by Lie ordinance'. In passing a zoning
or rezoning ord`_nanee, a city council is required to
maize a legislative judgment that a certain zoning
classification"";,il 'promote tho public health, safety,
morals and l;encral welfare.' In granting or denying
a speciril u:u: ,;o ;,:it, a city council is not altering
the legislative judgment as to the zoning classification,
Rather, it has 6he function, adjudicative in nature, of
applying specific use standards set by the zoning ordinance
to a particular individual use and must be held strictly to
those standards.
"The proposed 'nigh density use of the subject land was
not in conforniL'y with existing zoning classifications
and therefore could not have L-een accomplished through
a special use permit -Me use could be permitted only
thrqugh amerdme:a of the zoning ordinance. This was not
a case whom the council was enaf.;led to obtain a lesser
standard of judicial scrutiny than would otherwise be
applied sis:ply by choosing to label its action 'rezoning'.
An amendment of Lil.: zoning ordinance was required and once
was pas:%c:d. No other label would have applied to the
council's actio:.. S9:e council's amendment of the ordinance,
under o.::; previo.:s ;holdings, involved a legislative judgment
and as such immust :;a reviewed under the narrow scope of
judicial review idled•"
2. The next arguni,::t prusuntud %.as that the council acted
arbitrary and q uYlelous and wi Lileui :C.: Gla ilu rClation to promoting
public health, safety, ;,:ore::; and gunor.al wulfaru. This was based
on the fact tllaL tnU Grui:iii:iJ.i ii:'lGiiiiiy LhU rUj;Cl:4.y, when adopted
against the planning co,..missi.on's reco;,.r.enciatioa, was inconsistent
With the city's land usu plan, waL; tiv..rCa ter amended to con-
form to the zoning chatrju. Thu Supru;1-u Court says that although
other states have required conformance to the city's land use plan
when zoning, they do not find that requirement in the Minnesota
Statutes. The court citos 462.351 to 462.364 which provides for
the adoption of a comprehensive land use plan to guide future
developments in a municipality, and 462.357 which provides the
municipality with power to effectuate its land use plan through
zoning. Although the Association argued that the comprehensive
land use plan must be amended before a zoning ordinance can be
amended, the Minnesota Supreme Court said,
"We read the Statute to require only that a land
use plan be adopted before the initial zoning 1
ordinance is adopted. The Statute in fact does
not require even that the zoning ordinance conform
exactly to the City's land use plan. While it may
seem desirable as a matter of municipal planning
to amend the land use plan before adopting an in- 9
consistent zoning ordinance, s c a requirement is j
properly a matter for the legislature, not for this I
court, to consider." I
In upholding the City's position, the supreme Court said that the
City strictly followed the procedures of 462.357, Subds. 3 and 4,
requiring that a proposed amendment to the zoning ordinance first
i
be submitted to the planning agency for a recommendation and that
public hearing be held. "There is nothing in 462.357 which makes -�
the recommendation of the planning commission binding upon the city
council or governing body." The Supreme Court then upheld the City's
action and did not find that it had acted arbitrary and capricious
and examined all of the evidence relating to the surrounding property
and the need for the particular facility involved in the zoning.
3. As to the question of spot zoning, I would only indicate
that the definition for this term as set forth by our Supreme Colut
-4-
is "zoning ci:anges, typically limited to small plots of land, which
establish a use classification inconsistent with surrounding uses
and create an island of non -conforming use within a larger zoned
district, and which dramatically reduced the value for uses specified
in the zoning ordinance of either the rezoned plot or abutting
property." The court did not consider the City's action as spot
zoning.
It should be noted L%at thu.-. was a dissenting opinion and
felt that there should be no distinction between the granting or
denying of a special use purmiz and the rezoning of a parcel of
land.
CONCLUSION
1. zoning or rezoning actions by the city council are legis-
lative acts that the courts will sustain unless they are clearly
arbitrary and capricious and are not supported by any rational basis
related to promoting the public health, safety, morals, or general
welfare, or that the classification amounts to a taking of someonds
property right without compensation.
2. That as to special or conditional use permits, a denial
of one is prima facie, arbitrary and unreasonable if it is shown
that the council failed to support its action by written findings of
substantial ovidunce showing the use inpermissible under the ep rmit
standards of the ordinance.
3. That although it may he desirable that the comprehensive
i
�i land use plan be censirj' en1. with the zoning plan, the Minnesota
Supreme Court does not interpret the applicable statutes to make
consistency a requirement (unless the Minnesota Legislature so
determines at a later ti;;;e) and finds no problem with the amendment
of the corprahe nsivo land use plan subsequent to the rezoning
ordinance as was done in the Rochester Case.
by reco.numondation would be that the planning authorities of
the City should endeavor, w;;.:naver possible, to maintain consistency
between the land use plan and the :toning plan. Implicit in this
decision, is that it is t:aa zoning that controls the use of the
-5-
property and not: the corapieiiensive i u.0 uae plan. Ahcre is also
a question as to waat of OCt ti o rC:::0:1S1VG lan4 USe plan would
have on the issuance or Uenlal Of uric permit request. it
appears that the existing ordinances reguldting conditional or special
use permits are the sole criteria that will be used to determine the
validity of the council's action in granting or denying a special
or conditional use permit. The zoning, ordinances regulate the use
of property. The comprehensive land use plan will not regulate the
use of property until the zoning ordinances implement said plan.
1Z � pectfu y SUb� fitted,
i L
(�ucliard ;7cyers�
`ounds View City ttorney r ,
May 15, 1978
r
1lil;O1,11111O11 No. 1499
CITY OF MOUND!; VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
11TATH Oil MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION DENYING DEVE1,O11MEN'I' Iil{QUI;1;'1' BY DYNAMIC DESIGNERS
WIIEREAb, the developer. for Dynamic Douignorn has roquosted
City Council approval to proceed with construction of two fourplox
dwellings on two lots within Mound" Vlow; and
WHEREAS, portions of those lot" Ito within area" prenantly
regulatod by Ordinance No. 301 entltlodI "An 011111a1100 Prohibiting
Development of Private Wetlands oil an lntur.im Basin"I and
WHEREAS, following review of tlic nito and data eubmltted by the
developer, it has bean determined that a largo amount of fill will be
required within the designated wotland area to acuommodato the pro-
posed development; and
WHEREAS, there is an insufficient amount of existing dry/
buildable land to complete the proposed projects and
WHEREAS, any building development that would occur on the
lots would encroach upon the existing wetlands
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the
City of Mounds View finds that there is insufficient dry/buildable"
land within the proposed sites to allow developmant of the proposed
project and denies the request by Dynamic Designers to proceed with
development based upon the regulations of ordinance No. 301, amended
by Ordinance No. 305.
ATTEST;
(SEAL)
Adopted this 27th day of September, 1982.
Mayor
er -A ministrator
R/�i0
MEMO TO: Mayor and City Coin,
FROM: Clerk-Administrato,
DATE: September 23, 1982
SUBJECT: APPLICATION FOR RESTAURANT LICENSE AND TRANSFER OF
ON -SALE LIQUOR LICENSE FROM RICHARD AND MARLENE
POVLITZKI/dba POVLITZKI'S,ON 10 TO DONALD W. BAKER,
JOSEPH M. BAKER, AND PATRICK A. CONROY, JR./dba
GOPHER -SHAMROCK, INC.
Attached please find copies of brief biographical histories and
reference listings for the individuals requesting the restaurant
license and transfer of the on -sale liquor license for Povlitzki's
on 10. Due to a misunderstanding of the desires of the City
Council, a listing of neighbors in the area of Conroy's Bar and
Lounge were provided rather than letters of reference as was
requested by the Council.
Members of the Police Department contacted four individuals who
reside within one and a half blocks of Conroy's Bar and Lounge,
with all four indicating that Conroy's is a well run business
and that they had no complaints regarding its operations. The
Police Department and staff also contacted various references
provided by the three individuals and in all cases were informed
that these individuals are reputable and that they would have no
hesitation recommending these individuals for an on -sale liquor
license in the City of Mounds View.
Also, the City has been advised that Mr. Joseph M. Baker will be
the named licensee and the Manager of Povlitzki's on 10, with
Mr. Patrick Conroy, Jr., assisting him in the management of the
operation.
Should Council require any additional information on any of these
individuals or their application for licenses, please advise.
Attachments
�I
Donald W. Baker lives at 3275 Glen Oaks, White Bear Lake, Minnesota.
He residesere alo g with his wife of 29 years. They have lived at this
address since they built this home in 1968. They are the parents of six
children. Four of their children, Joseph, William, Thomas and John attended
and graduated from the University of Minnesota. Their daughter, Molly,
attended and graduated from St. Catherine's College of St. Paul. Their
youngest son, Don Jr., is attending St. Thomas College of St. Paul.
Presently Donald Baker is part owner of a company called Sterling
Investments, Inc. He owns this business along with one partner. This
company is in the business of selling businesses and do specialize in the
liquor industry, and the selling of Liquor Bars, Supper Clubs and Package
Liquor Stores throughout the state of Minnesota. The company is 17 years
old and Mr. Baker has been with the company since 1976.
Prior to working for Sterling Investment, Mr. Baker worked for Griggs
Cooper Co. Inc., St. Paul, Minnesota as a wholesale liquor salesman and as
a sales supervisor. He worked for Griggs Cooper Co. for a total of 13 years.
Prior to working for Griggs Cooper Co., Mr. Baker worked for National
Biscuit Co., Minneapolis, Minnesota. Mr. Baker worked as a salesman for
Nabisco for twelve years. Prior to that time Mr. Baker was in the U.S. Navy;
prior to that time he was a student.
In the last six years Mr. Donald Baker, in addition to selling a variety
of liquor businesses, also became part owner of a liquor business on two
occasions. During 1977 Mr. Baker was part owner of the Depot Bar at
241 E. Kellogg Blvd., St. Paul, Minnesota. He sold out his interest to
Doug Alley late in 1977. In 1978 Mr. Baker became part owner of a business
in St. Paul called the Chain Link at 2210 Hudson Road, St. Paul, Minnesota.
In both of these cases Mr. Baker became involved in these businesses in lieu
of commission buL did not paiticipate iri the management of either place, did
not receive any income, make or implement any policy.
As a Business Broker it developed that Mr. Baker came to know Mr. Richard
Povlitslci and Mr. Pat Conroy Jr Mr. Pcvlitski bought and sold a bar that
Mr. Baker's company acted as the agent. Mr. Baker got to know Mr. Conroy Jr.
when he purchased his present bar 5!; years ago.
As a Business Broker Mr. Baker now has Mr. Conroy's present bar for
sale, mainly because he wants to move on as his present bar lacks enough
parking.
Mr. Donald Baker is the President of the buying corporation known as
the Gopher -Shamrock Corporation.
Mr. Joseph Baker will be the manager of Povlitski's and he will be the
person responsible to the City, to operate the bar in a manner satisfactory
to the City.
I Mr. Donald W. Baker References
Business:
Mr. Robert E. "Mike" Ruddy
900 N.W. National Bank Building
V.P. Alexander and Alexander
St. Paul, MN 55101
Phone 227-9201
Mr, Edwin Martin
6950 Wayzata Blvd.
Minneapolis, MN 55416
President Business Marketers
Phone 546-7527
Mr. Floyd E. Jetland
151 Windsor Lane
New Brighton, MN 55112
Home Phone 636-0269
Mr. Donald Mattaini
406 - 6th Avenue South
South St. Paul, MN 55075
Home Phone 451-0809
Neighbors:
Mr. Richard A. Korfhage
2599 Oak Drive
White Bear Lake, MN 55110
Home Phone 777-8474
Mr. Richard Kuchera
2574 Oak Drive
White Bear Lake, MN 55110
Phone 777-4852
Mr. Lawrence R. Arseth
2610 Oak Drive
White Bear Lake, MN 55110
Phone 777-7281
Mr. Kenneth Kieger
2592 Roth Place
White Bear Lake, MN
Phone 429-0141
u
Mr. Donald W. Baker References continued.
Law Enforcement:
Deputy Chief Thomas Hagen
City Hall
Maple Wood, MN 55109
Phone 770-4534
Lt. Russ Bovee
St. Paul Police Dept,
Narcotics Dept.
Phone 291-1111
N
Mr. Joseph M. Baker is the oldest son of Donald W. Baker and Mary A.
Baker.
Joe Baker was born June 6, 1955, attended grade school in Maple Wood,
Minnesota, attended junior high school and high school in White Bear Lake,
Minnesota.
Joe Baker graduated from White Bear Lake•High School in the upper 10
per cent of his class. He won athletic honors in baseball, football and
hockey. After graduating from high school, Joe Baker was recruited to play
college football for a number of schools but decided to play Junior A hockey
for the St. Paul Vulcans and Coach Doug Woog for a year before going on to
college. During this year Joe Baker worked at Otto's Liquor Store in
Mendota, Minnesota.
Herb Brooks recruited Joe Baker to play hockey for the University of
Minnesota, which he did for the following 4 years. Joe did have a chance
to play for two National Champions in 1976 and again in 1979. Joe is the
Gopher part of the Gopher -Shamrock.
After leaving the University, Joe joined his father at the Sterling
Investment, Inc. Company and has worked there full time since. During this
time he has gained knowledge in the operations of a wide variety of liquor
businesses.
Joe Baker is now married and has a two year old little girl.
References:
Mr. John Brink
Hennepin County Prosecutor
Phone 377-7020
Mr. Brad Buetow
Head Hockey Coach
University of Minnesota
Phone 3I3-4225
Mr. Mike Andrews
Owner of Sargent Preston's and
The Loon Cafe of Minneapolis, MN
Phone 332-8342
Dr. James Boo
Mahtomedi Dentist
Home Phone 429-9257
Office Phone 426-2116
Joe Baker has been active in community work with young people and the
problems of the abuse of chemicals. For a character reference in this regard
please contact;
Mr. Lyle Helke
429-5391, Extension 362
A
I
14
Mr. Patrick Conroy, Jr. is the son of Patrick Conroy, Sr. He has
three brothers and three sisters.
He was born in St. Paul, Minnesota on June 14, 1953. He attended
school at St. Thomas Grade School and Hill High School.
After playing on some of the excellent Hill High School hockey teams
and graduating from High School in 1971, Pat Conroy, Jr. left St. Paul and
went on to the University of Notre Dame. He attended Notre Dame for four
years, received a Degree in Business and played hockey for the school for
four years. He was captain of the hockey team in his senior year. Pat
is the Shamrock in the Gopher -Shamrock.
Since college Pat Conroy, Jr. has gotten married, had two little girls.
He worked for his father in the Conroy Construction Co., has been assistant
hockey coach at Saint Paul Academy, and operated his own business, Conroy's
Bar in St. Paul for the last 5� years.
Pat Conroy will assist Joe Baker in the operation of Povlitski's.
Neighbors in the area of Pat Conroy's Bar.
Dave Neuman
991 Arcade St.
776-5062
Dick Verrette
957 Jenks
776-7207
John Dagen
896 Jenks
776-8591
Herman Voerding
843 Jenks
771-2483
Don Jackelen
1007 Arcade
778-8425
Ron Hunt
839 Jenks
776-9553
Mike & Mardell Lowry
846 Lawson
774-6646
Greg Bradley
723 Jenks
776-1129
Tony Kwiatkowski
1137 Jenks
771-6356
Mike Fitch
847 Lawson
771-2777
0
•
TO: Clerk -Administrator
FROM: Police Department
DATE: September 22, 1982
RE: Liquor License Application for Povlitzki's
The following investigation was done on Conroys Dar, 992 Arcade, St. Paul:
Drove to area of 992 Arcade and observed it to be a small neighborhood
business area. According to a resident on Jenks Ave. there are very few
private residences in the area, most are duplexes.
Interviewed 4 individuals, 3 males, 1 female, on the street near Conroys
Dar. All four stated that they lived within a block and a half of the bar.
All four stated that Conroys was a well run business and they had no
complaints.
Called St. Paul Police Department, talked to a member of the Narcotics
Unit. Records in that Unit indicate no drug investigations during
past 5 years involving Conroys.
Called St. Paul Police Department, to a member of the Vice Unit.
Records in that Unit indicate no liquor violations or problems related
with prostitution during past 4 years involving Conroys.
Called Maplewood Police Department, talked to Assistant Chief, Thomas
Hagen. Ile stated that he's known the. Baker family since 1955 and coached
all the boys in Little League Baseball. Stated all of the Bakers are
fine people. His personal knowledge of Joe Baker is that Joe is a fine
young man.
Called St. Paul Liquor Licensing. Was informed that there was no
complaint against Donald Baker regarding any business operations.
From all information obtained in investigation, both applicants appear
to be completely acceptable.
1�1
s'
MEMO TO: Mayor and City
FROM:
DATE: September 23, 1982
SUBJECT: PINEWOOD DRIVE STREETLIGHT PETITION
Attached please find a copy of a petition received by this
office for the placement of two streetlights on Pinewood Drive
between Quincy Street and 35W. The petitioners have requested
the placement of lights between 2071 and 2077 Pinewood Drive
and 2127 Pinewood Drive. Staff review of the petition per a
memorandum and attached map from Engineering/Planning Technician
Frank Kampel indicates that the petition complies with the City's
requirements, however, one location proposed by the petitioners
has been determined by representatives of Northern States Power
to be inaccessible due to the lack of a pole in the rear yard
supplying primary power. Staff has discussed an alternate location
•t, i .. ible for the d:.$trlh.i ti^n
pj:oposed by NSP Wli. h the inuaiVidual rccp0...ns+
of the petition within the neighborhood, Mrs. Larry McLaughlin,
who has indicated that the alternate site would be acceptable.
Based on these discussions and the acceptability of the alternate
location by residents in the area staff would recommend Council
authorization for the placement of streetlights on Pinewood Drive
between 2127 and 2119 and between 2085 and 2077 Pinewood Drive.
Northern States Power has indicated that these lights would be
installed at no expense to the City of Mounds View, therefore,
our expense would be limited to the payment of the monthly
operating costs for these lights and sufficient :ponies appear to
be available in the budget for this purpose.
DFP/pf
Attachments
PETITION
l
WE THE UNDERSIGN {lOULD LIKE TO PETITION THE CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW TO
INSTALL 2 STREEI LIGHTS FOR THE RESIDENTS OF PINEWOOD DRIVE PARELLEL
WITH COUNTY RD I AND BESIDE HWY 35W, ONE TO BE INSTALLED BETWEEN
2071 AND 2077 PINEWOOD DRIVE AND THE OTHER ONE AT 2127 PINEWOOD DRIVE,
NAME ADDRESS
%77,4�4�
/77...,.QCN
Aj
r»T�n.�lf�.1_ 7,n% ri��•! l'
�f'l� 4/• �L�v' ->Lr�z �n.� :v�c:'2�.1�.:: /'� •i', _� �� t,:,�—•�.�•/nC�./1.
0
r-
��16
� i )j ice{"Y`•Zk •r--- !--/ J.5 ^ �. b 1 �.(,.A^G .�d i j ,
MEMO TO: Clerk -Administrator
FROM: Engineering/Planning Technician FJ
DATE: August 16, 1982
SUBJECT: PINEWOOD DRIVE STREETLIGHT
Attached is a map showing properties which signed a petition
(shaded) for a street light on Pinewood Drive between Inter-
state 35W and Quincy Street, and also location of existing
streetlgiht and rear vard poles. A signature from the School
District has not ben :obtained (technically a directly affected
property owner) but because of distance, any street light on
L 1llCYIVVU lV4 ..Vvi..n
a Dr is t a
iffet cthan a;newnod School orooerty.
Other than this, all conditions will be met if streetlights are
placed in the locations shown on the map. These possible loca-
tions are very near those proposed by the petitioners. There
is presently no streetlight at Pinewood Drive and the pedestrian
walkway nor at Pinewood Drive and the 35W frontage Road.
Also attached is Resolution No. 1069 which sets policies for
street light installations and the petition.
FJK/bc
Attachments
f3 1 2 I
a0431r+32
h
d
J
T�.
M
J� 3 r ,2 1
Q ?4
2
•
I
r
30
31'
32
L'
e , ,
�.,
w n•. rns1 � � , N
714.. I
r�IIN`
13 IG II ! If' 1 9 I P 7 I p 5 4 3,1 2 I I
28
• / I . ]',, 18 19• 120 121 122 , 23 2a 12- ,_6 ; 27 (i i 29 30 i 31
DR;?
�- ' ,
r I
16 ,5 I 11 ! 13 12 11 o E 7 i 6 5 .4 3 2 I
2 •...�
{�17i1819I2021221;21124•25f2E27i28I29I30i31!,3
It V i
I
Q „� . I • I
l ,•- I ., .1.,._L�.-u_.i� �� • •I' I I l.. .rig
n DR3
' I IF ,�7s., j�•• I
r! Ip I IS 14 ! 13 12 a IC i 9 p l 776�
4327, �
_.w,.,c A- A AF1Q6 �—
c
--r-+r�.�•c err : �-
26
D R.
.
Hillview Road
Oakwood Drive
X EXISTINII, POLE
,c Iosslst - u HT
,., I-ocATl
A. EX15TW& L. a T
PRoFoseo wbµT
by P Priom
Terrace Drive
This is a compilation of
'sources affecting the ar
vised and updated by Com
This drawing is to be us
purposes and Comstock 6
responsible for any inac,
tained.
3 PinewoAd Dr. \\�
County . 1
" ' _ _._ - —CD 3
(vim Wr Kvz I
PIPE- b612 RIjE)
WIIRRI:AS, a:u•I: ,n It,r City Council. •
for the iusl.lJJ.:t.Inr of :tr! 1. 11oht,:1
WHEREAS,
budget item, and
n;,zraLing strco
WHEREAS, tl:e City Council desires Lo maintain and enhance
the safety of its neighborhoods through Lhc provision of street
lights while at the same lime keeping the t.nx burden of operating
street lights at a minimum;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE 11' RE'SCITNED I,y the Council.
of Mounds View L'haL the following pol i• shall aov..rn
tion of street lights in roai,hnitial .,I,.c::
Property owner; dw.i1ir�! inn! .i;l,, ,i :Uecl' lighl:s
shall submit. .I;,-,Iilicn: reque!a,;wi ouch o.;Lh t.hrr siynat:ures
of at least f.ifLy percent of rho affoclod property owners.
All signatures of persons on Lhe pet.ition shall mean their
consent to Lhe locm.ioni of Iho 1i;ht, on or near their.
property. The pct..it.ion ::hall include sitm,aLuros of consent
of the property owner dirvellp ,iff,:•:t.••;l by Lhc final
location. A property ,;wncr slc.1] i h-t a,• rr. v! to he affected
if his/her property is within 200 i'vot it, an" •ilrect
direction from the prnpo od stir(o light lncatL•n on nft.her
"side of the street. ,t{r_ilgl9�l1"�
The proposed location shall mcN at least one of the
following criteria: EWVM 17 9, shrug :turves, cul do
sacs, dead ends, l.onq blocks, ''vandal i.xr•d areas, or MW
A showing of need for a
similar criteria may also quali.fy. The rriteria must he
related to a need for public safety.
All street .lights shall be spaced at least 400 feet apart
unless the above criteria apply, rn no case shall lights
be closer than 250 feet to one another.
All new street light installations shall he 100 watt
pressure sodium at a 30 foot mouhLiny height.
Street lights shall be included in all public
projects according to the above, rriter.io.
Qualifying requests for street lights may be scheduled for
installation in a subsequenL year .if tho City Council deter-
mines sufficient funds are not available in the current city
budget.
this llth day of
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
CITY COUNCIL
Special Council Meeting
October 9, 1982
7:00 p.m.
1. Consideration of Resolution No. 1502 Levying Delinquent
Utility Charges and Staff Memorandum
2. Consideration of Contract Extension with John Johnson
for Professional Engineering Services and Staff Memorandum
Agenda Session
October 9, 1982
1. Consideration of staff memorandum regarding parking on
Greenfield Avenue and County Road I
2. Consideration of staff report on Airport Operators Meeting
3. Update on Union contract negotiations
9. Consideration of staff memorandum regarding Health Service
Officer
5. Consideration of letter from Bruce Malkerson representing
John and Jim Miller regarding Wetlands Ordinance
6. Consideration of staff memorandum regarding specifications
for the purchase of a one ton dump truck
7. Review of City Newsletter copy
8. Reports of Director of Public Works/Community Development
A) Discussion of culverts along County Road I and
St. Michael and St. Stephen
B) Report on meeting with Ramsey County Public Works
Department
C) Consideration of final payment on Sealcoating project
D) Status report on SEH projects (memo to be handed out
Monday evening)
E) Report on Met Council revised transporation development
guide/policy plan for 2,000 (Public Rearing on 10/12/82)
F) Report on water study
*4u
TO: Mayor & Council
FRCM: Finance Director -Treasurer Erager
'DATE: September 30, 1982
RE: CERTIFICATION OF DELINQUENT ACCOUNTS TO WE COUNTY
Pursuant to Council direction given at the September 27, 1982
meeting a list of persons ageing money to the City other than utility bills
is attached. These include amounts due for tree removal originally billed
in the fall of 1981, developer's administrative charges and insufficient
funds check charges.
I spoke with the City Attorney and was advised that at the present
time the City has authority to levy a tax only for delinquent utility bills
and tree removal charges. In his opinion no authority exists to levy a tax
for other amounts due to the City.
Subsequent to the City Attorney's opinion,letters (registered mail -
return receipt requested) were sent to those individuals that have past due
utility and Lxee removal bills. The ietLi:rs aiivi5iti of CAWlcil's intention
to consider levying a tax on their property for the past due amounts unless
payment was received or an agreement for installment payments was entered into
by October 8, 1982. A copy of the letters sent is attached. October 8, 1982
was chosen as the last day for payment or entering into an agreement because
October ll,(the next working day) is the last day for giving the County a
signed resolution authorizing the levying of the tax.
If it is Council's desire to levy a tax for delinquent utility and
tree removal bills, staff suggests a resolution be adopted stating any amounts
remaining unpaid at 4:30 p.m. October 8, 1982 be levied as a tax against each
affected property.
Enclosures: List of delinquent utility bills
List of delinquent tree removal. bills
List of delinquent administrative charges
List of insufficient funds check charges
Copy of letter on delinquent utility bills
Copy of letter on delinquent tree removal bills
Proposed resolution levying a tax for delinquent utility
and tree removal bills
9/21/82
DELINQUENT
0
UTILITY BILLS
Account
Name & Address
Water
Sewer
Late Chg,
Sub
59
1-006920
Gordon Smith
Penalt
Total
Adm.Fee
Final
Total
2816 Ardan Avenue
15,95
24,50
19.10
59.55
2.99
62.54
1-009550
Steve Miller
2174 Belle Lane
21.91
24.50
30.35
76.76
3.84
80.60
1-015000
Ralph Zeglin
5046 Brighton Lane
59.40
24.50
27.61
111.51
5.57
117.08
1-019200
Dennis Cooper
13.75
24.50
18.41
2209 Bronson Drive
56.66
2.84
59.50
1-020050
Daniel Hill
2808 Bronson Drive
12.10
24.50
11.51
48.11
2,at
5052
.
1-023150
Roger Janssen
2440 Clearview Avenue
27.50
24.50
22.64
74.64
3.74
78.38
1-027000
James Deutsch
5294 Clifton Drive
18.70
24.50
21.74
64.94
3.24
68.18
1-061700
Beverly Fisher
2901 County Road H2
0
63.50
91.85
155.35
7.77
163.12
1-083100
Larry Wedin
7990 Eastwood Road
208.00
24,50
106.26
338.76
16.94
355.70
1-083950
Nellie Domeier
0
39,00
8171 Eastwnna Fc;d
u
0
1.75
36.75
1.-111600
James Carter
7660 Greenfield Avenue
13.75
24.50
15.43
53.68
2.68
56.36
1-120560
James Schorn Sr.
8400 Greenwood Drive
31.90
24.50
24.03
80.43
4.03
89.96
1-127800
Daniel Reis
7710 Groveland Road
22.00
24.50
20.97
67.97
3.37
70.84
9/21/82
DELINQUENT UTILITY ➢ILLS
Account #
Name & Address
Water
Sewer
Late Chg.
Sub
58
Final
Penalt
Total
Adm.Fee
Total
1-133400
Country Kitchen
988.96
759.50
672.71
2,444.00
122.20
2,566.20
2145 Highway Avenue -Tax
22.83
1-150300
Larry Parks
15.95
24.50
12.49
52.94
2.64
55.58
2504 Hillveiw Road
1-150350
Thomas Dreshar
6.05
24.50
13.77
44.32
2.22
46.54
2508 Hillview Road
1-158050
Harry Stanke
0
24.50
9.47
33.97
1.67
35.66
5387 Jackson Drive
1-164500
John Pickar
11.00
24.50
20.92
56.42
2.82
59.24
2299 Knoll Drive
1-167900
Allen Bonin
25.30
24.50
21.16
70.96
3.54
74.50
7090 Knollwood Drive
1-179100
Mrs. Arthur Docken
3.85
24.50
8.52
36.87
1.85
38.72
2235 Lambert Avenue
1-181600
Leona Kuehn
33.00
63.50
65.24
161.74
8.08
169.82
2349 Laport Drive
1-183850
William Tisdell
24.75
26,19
20.71
71.65
3.59
75.24
2740-42 Laport Drive
1-199800
Gary Grieme
3.30
24.50
15.17
42.97
2.15
45.12
5172 Longview Drive
1-209350
Thomas Blomberg
3.30
10.23
5.21
18.74
19.68
207). Oakwood Drive
.94
1-211550
Marie Paul
15.95
24.50
12.77
53.22
2.66
55.88
2250 Oakwood Drive
9/21/
DELINQUENT UTILITY BILLS
Account #
Name & Address
Water
Sewer
Late Chg.
Sub
5%
Final
Penalty
Total
Adm.Fee
Total
1-217400
Robert Waste Jr.
5290 Pinewood
52.25
44.00
37.03
133.28
6.66
139.94
Court
1-219900
Eugene Wilson
2119 Pinewood Drive
8.80
24.50
10.82
44.12
2.20
46.32
1-224150
Joseph Witzmann
16.50
24.50
19.26
60.26
3.02
63.28
6991 Pleasant View Drive
1-224600
Donald Harrison
0
63.50
23.11
86.61
4.33
90.94
7069 Pleasant View Drive
1-225700
Marvin Hanson
8360 Pleasant View Drive
18.70
63.50
43.03
125.23
6.27
131.50
1-22aen0
5399 HarreQuincy ll Ham^
.aon Street
„
i1.60
20.42
12.b9
50.71
2.53
53.24
1-239800
G.I. Properties
29.70
49.00
32.91
111.61
5.59
117.20
5741-43 Quincy Street
1-243800
Thomas Chelberg
11.00
24.50
11.84
47.34
2.36
49.70
5045 Rainbow Lane
1-307400
Larry Stevens
5132 Red Oak Drive
9.43
0
10.04
19.47
.97
20.44
1-315150
Paul Johnson
6.05
24.50
16.03
46.58
2.32
48.90
8368 Red Oak Drive
1-315450
Richard Huhne
0
24.50
7.60
32.10
1.60
33.70
8406 Red Oak Drive
1-327850
Bonnie Erdman
0
24.50
9.31
33.81
1.69
35.50
2434 Sherwood Road
1-334750
Jim Wyatt
7288 Silver Lake Road
16.50
24.50
17.11
58.11
2.91
61.02
9/21/82
DELINQUENT UTILITY BILLS
Account #
Name & Address
Water
Sewer
Late Chg.
Sub
Penalt
Total
1-340000
Donald Elofson
23.10
23.78
18.13
65.01
5261 Skiba Drive
1-344950
Ken Bourke
33.00
44.00
33.75
110.75
8249 Spring Lake Road
1-355450
Roger Scheid
8.80
24.50
14.33
47.63
5520 St. Michael Street
1-381450
John Westlund
12.65
24.50
11.69
48.84
5092 Sunnyside Road
1-410800
Frank Young
36.30
63.50
50.07
149.87
2138 Terrace Drive
1-410900
Daniel Miller
19.25
24.50
13.30
57.05
2146 Terrace Drive
1-424100
Ronald Novak
35.75
49.00
23.42
108.17
7626 A & B Woodlawn Drive
1-427450
Betts & Belisle
12.65
24.50
18.07
55.22
7889 Woodlawn Drive
1-172000
Thomas Field
0
0
3.96
3.96
8409 Knollwood Drive
TOTALS 1944.40 2113.62 1725.54 5761.39
Tax 22.83
58
Adm.Fe
3.25
5.53
2.39
2.44
7.49
2.85
5.41
2.76
.20
290.32
DE.T. NQUENT 'I'Ril REMOVAL GIAR�iII5
Lawrence Simon
$119.05
Allen Bonin
$193.45
Thomas Holm
$ 66.15
Thomas 11all
$212.40
M.S. El-Ralawani
$101.05
Spars Properties
$199.90
Joseph D. Ryan
$ 83.75
John li. Mathern
$ 76.45
X
9/30/82
DELINQUENT ADMINISTRATIVE CHARGES 9/30/82
Charbonnoau Subdivision $ 39.33
Gale Addition $ 79.64
Miller Industrial Park $842.72
'I"I
ff
INSUFFICLENT FUNDS CHECK CHARGES
Robert Linse
$
5.00
Theis Const. Co.
$
5.00
Rosemary SLrus
$
5.00
James Peterson
$
5.00
Patricia Thompson
$
5.00
Melvin Schuchard
$
5.00
W.T. Lindsay
$
5.00
Kenneth Link
$
5.00
Daniel Reis
$
5.00
Robert Waste Jr.
$
5.00
Orreen Jeska
$
5.00
Kenneth Berryman
$
5.00
Patricia Reis
$
5.00
David Hilbrands
$
5.00
Jim Whittle
$
5.00
Dennis Smith
$
5.00
Spagenski's Transfer
$
5.00
Gary Lavasseur
$
5.00
Patrick Denney
$
5.00
Deborah F. Wood
$
5.00
Robert Waste Jr.
$
5.00
J & E Electric Co. Inc.
$
5.00
Eugene DeWitt
$
5.00
J & E Electric Co. Inc.
$10.00
Larry L. Stevens
$
5.00
Bob's Trophies Softball
$
5.00
R. James Zeglin
$
5.00
Harry T. Stfus
$
5.00
W.T. Lindsay
$
5.00
Beverly Hines
$
5.00
Marvin Morse
$
5.00
Steven Miller
$
5.00
Robert Rogers
$
5.00
Abel Ruiz
$
5.00
Melvin Schuchard
$
5.00
Gordon Bayerkohler
$
5.00
Achievements In Design
$
5.00
9/30/82
INSUFFICIENT FUNDS CHECK CHARGES
(continued)
Joseph Weller
$
5.00
Gordon Oayerkohler
$
5.00
John E. Pickar III
$
5.00
W.T. Lindsay
$
5.00
David Hilbrands
$
5.00
Robert Ludgate
$
5.00
Steven Miller
$
5.00
Andrew Wilson
$
5.00
Russ Warren- DFL
$
5.00
Caroline LaPoint
$
5.00
TOTAL $240.00
9/30/82
0
i
September 29, 1982
As you may recall, you have received several reminder
- notices regarding the past due amount of $ on your
utility bill. Since these reminders have not resulted in pay-
ment of the past due amount or execution of a written agreement
providing for installment payments, the City Council will be
considering the levying of a tax on your property for the past
due amount during their meeting October 4, 1982, to be held at
7:00 p.m. in the Mounds View City Hall. Past due accounts
certified to the Ramsey County Department of Property Taxation
for collection with property taxes payable in 1983 will include
an administrative fee of 5% and interest on the total amount at
a rate of 88 for one year.
If it is your desire to avoid having the past due amount
levied on your property taxes, you may do so by mailing payment
in full or entering into a written installment payment agreement
no later than 4:30 p.m. on October 8, 1982.
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
Donald Brager
Finance Director -Treasurer
DB/ds
September 30, 1982
As you may recall, you have received several invoices for
trees removed from your property in the amount of $
Since these reminders have not resulted in payment or execution
of a written agreement providing for installment payments, the
City Council will be considering the levying of a tax on your
property for these tree removal costs during their meeting
October 4, 1982, to be held at 7:00 p.m. in the Mounds View City
Hall. Amounts certified to the Ramsey County Department of
Property Taxation for collection with property taxes payable in
1983 will include an administrative fee of 58 and interest on
the total amount at a rate of 88 for one year.
If it is your desire to avoid having these tree removal
costs levied on your property taxes, you may do so by mailing
payment in full or entering into a written installment payment
agreement no later than 4:30 p.m. on October 8, 1982.
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
Donald Brager
Finance Director -Treasurer
DB/ds
RES0LUTION NO.
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of
the City Council of the City of Mounds View, Minnesota, was
duly called and held in the Council Chambers in said City on
the
Member introduced the following resolution
and moved its adoption:
A RESOLUTION LEVYING A TAX FOR DELINQUENT UTILITY
AND TREE REMOVAL CHARGES OVER A ONE YEAR PERIOD
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed all property to
which there is a delinquent utility or tree removal charge; and
WHEREAS, it has been determined each affected property is
responsible for each charge the owner has incurred;
WHEREAS, each affected property owner has been notified of
said delinquent charges and of the Council's intent to consider
the levying of a tax for such delinquent charges over a one year
period;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Council of the City
of Mounds View hereby authorizes and directs the City Clerk to
certify to the Auditor of Ramsey County a list of those delinquent
..td 13 ty d ......c t clargcz; ..hi.d. i.3v .^
u ut�y ai,u licu 3".vmQJat uuuay„ .. ., r2maiu unpaid ao cf p.....
October 3, 1982, said list made a part herein, for certification
against the tax levy of said property owners for the year 1982,
collectable in 1983, and which listing includes an administrative
fee of five percent (58). Interest shall be figured at the rate
of eight percent (8%) on the total amount for one year. Total
amount to be certified: $
The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly
seconded by Member and upon a vote being
taken, the following members voted in favor thereof:
and the following members voted against same:
whereupon said resolution was declared passed and adopted this
ATTEST:
(SEAL)
Clerk -Administrator
T0: Mayor & Council
KOM: Finance Director -Treasurer Brager
rTE: September 30, 1982
RE: PROPOSED AMENDMENT OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT WITH
JOHN JOHNSON
An amendment to the Professional Services contract with
John Johnson has recently been proposed. it is my understanding
that this proposal would increase the current contract by 360 hours
or $8,100.
Based upon discussions with Mr. Johnson, it is my understand-
ing that the 360 hours are estimated to be allocated among the
following projects:
Project }lours
Wetlands 180
Water study 40
MSA 5 year plan 40
Community Development
Department Administration
& Supervision 100
60
Possible funding of the 360 hours could be:
Fund/Project Hours Amount
Genelai Fuld 900
M.S.A. Study 40 $
Administration 50 1,125
TOTAL GENERAL FUND 90 $2,025
Storm Water Management
We 180 $4,050
Water
Administration 25 $ 563
Water study 40 900
TOTAL WATER FUND 65 $1,463
Sewer
ARm istration 25 $ 562
TOTAL 360 $8,100
September 30, 1982
Page 2
Sufficient unused budgeted personal services funds exist
in the Street Departmentidue to reorganization, to pay for the
projected General Funds share of proposed contract costs. As of
August 31, 1982 there is an unemcumbered balance of $18,271 in the
Street Department Personal Services accounts. If desired $2,025
could be transferred from the Street Department budget (100-270-4010,
Salaries) to the Public Works/Community Development Department budget
(100-260-4303, Professional Services) for the General Fund's share
of the contract.
The SWM Fund does not have an annual budget. Projects are
individually authorized and funded by the Council. If desired a
portion of the contract costs could be designated as being paid for
with SWM funds on hand.
The Water and Sewer Funds are earning interest on temporarily
idle funds at a higher rate than was budgeted. Therefore, sufficient
funds will be on hand to fund their share of the contract.
If you have an_v questions do nnr hesitate to contact me.
DB/ds
1
6601 - 75th Avenue N.
Brooklyn Park, Minnesota 55428
September 27, 1982
Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of Mounds View
2401 Highway 10
Mounds View, Minnesota 55112
Ladies and Gentlemen:
This letter is to confirm amendment of Professional Services
Contract dated May 6, 1982 between the City of Mounds View
and John C. Johnson. Existing contract expires October 9,
1982.
This amendment extends the contract thru December 31, 1982
at the average rate of 30 hours per week for a total of 12
weeks. The new total maximum manhours will be revised upward
from 700 to 1060. It is further, agreed that attendance at
regular and agenda City Council and Planning Comnission
meetings shall be reimbursed at a flat rate of 2 hours per
meeting.
If this agreement amendment is satisfactory, then please sign
in the spacE provided and return one ropy to me.
Very truly yours,
00 n C. John i, P.E.
JCJ/cj
cc: Don Pauley
ATTEST:
Accepted this _ day of
1982 by the City of Mounds View,
Minnesota, by
Mayor
MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Director Public Works/
Community Development
DATE 7 September 27, 1982
SUBJECT: Professional Services Contract
Attached is a copy of proposed Professional Services Contract amendment
which would extend the existing contract thru the end of 1982 at the
average rate of 30 hours per week. This would increase the current
contract by 360 hours or $8,100.00. The amendment also provides for
a flat fee per meeting for regular and agenda Council and Planning
Commission Meetings.
Under the current contract a total of 650+i hours have been expended
thru
September 28, 1982. Summarized
below is breakdown
of how the
hours have been utilized:
Hours
% of Total
1.
Wetlands/Flood Plain Ordinance
& Storm Water Management Plan
13212
20.4
2.
Preparation for and attendance
at Council Meetings
102
15.7
3.
1983 Budget Preparation
74
11.4
4.
Departmental Coordination
M2
10.8
5.
Department Head & Staff
Meetings
48
7.4
6.
Sanitary Sewer Department
Coordination
281,
4.4
7.
Water Department Coordination
421;
6.5
8.
Storm Sewer & Street
Department Coordination
41;
6.4
9.
Community Development/
Engineering Department,
Coordination
21
3.2
10.
Administration of Improve-
ment Projects
291;
4.5
11.
Initial Coordination, Reorgani-
zation and Miscellaneous
activities
461;
7.1
12.
Preparation for and Attendance
t
at Planning Commission Meetings
14
2.2
TOTAL
65012
100.0
Mayor and City Council
Page 2
September 27, 1902
Review work load from 8/8 thru 9/25 indicates that Public Works/
Community Development Department administration has required at a
minimum 1631 hours per week. Other activities such as water study,
I/1 Study and administration of improvement projects have required
another 3 hours per week.
Three significant engineering projects need to be completed yet this year:
1. Storm Water Management Plan (see attached memo)
2. Water System Study by T.K..O.A.
3. Minnesota State Aid 5 year Plan
In order to complete these projects daily departmental involvement should
be scaled back to 0 to 12 hours per week leaving 10 to 20 hours per week
to work on special projects.
If you have any questions, please contact me.
JCJ/cj
Enclosure
7
IJ
11
MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Director Public Works/ ( (�
Community Development G,
DATE September 27, 1982
SUBJECT: Tentative Schedule to Complete Storm Water Management Plan
The Mayor requested that an estimate of the work necessary to complete
the Storm Water Management Plan by December 1,
1982. The following is
a brief outline and estimated time required to
complete the plan.
Mounds View currently has 20 storm water drainage
subdistric s as
delineated by SEH in 1976. The area covers all
or part of )R-section
naps. It is estimated that to bring the Storm
Water Management Plan
to near completion the following activities and
manhours will be necessary.
I. Delineate drainage areas or, topo map
32-40 hours
2. Establish runoff factors
32-40 hours
3. Map and calculate drainage areas
50-60 hours
4. Calculate estimated peak discharges
16-24 hours
5. Calculate existing system capacity
16-24 hours
6. Analyze system capabilities and
alt,Hydrologic models (i.e. no,
limited, or full develop-ment)
32-40 hours
7. Prepare draft plan and report
12-16 hours
TOTAL 190-244 hours
Technician activities 60- 74 hours
NET TOTAL
Weekly average needed to complete by
December 1, 1982
JCJ/cj
130-170 hours
14-20 hours
qltO.144� i
i:EMO TO: Mayor and City Counc'1
FROM+ Clerk-Administrato
DATE: September 22, 1982
SUBJECT: PARKING ON GREENFIELD AVENUE AND COUNTY ROAD I
As a result of comments made by Councilmember Forslund during
the September 13th Agenda Session and numerous complaints this
office and the Police Department have received regarding the
placement of no parking signs by Ramsey County along County Road I,
staff has reviewed the matter to determine the extent of the
problem and evaluate what possible solutions might be available
to the City.
In evaluating the situation, staff took two basic steps to
evaluate the situation. The first was to determine the avail-
ability of off street parking to the apartment buildings on
Greenfield Avenue between Bronson Drive and Cou,ity Road I, and
on County Road I from Greenfield Avenue to Adams Street. Attached
please find drawings prepared by the City's Community Development
staff indicating the number of apartment units in each of the
1 buildings and the amount of parking lot spaces available to those
units in off street parking areas. In reviewing these drawings
please note the following:
1. The Bronson Drive apartments involvina 46 apartment units
have available 64 unmarked spaces and 24 garages, totaling
88 parking spaces or 1.91 spaces per unit.
2. The Greenfield Avenue apartments involving 125 apartment
units have 133 marked spaces and 126 garages, or 2.07 spaces
per unit.
3. The eight unit apartment buildings on County Road I between
Greenfield Avenue and Jackson Drive consist of 40 apartment
units with 54 parking spaces to the units, or 1.35 spaces
per unit.
4. The Mounds View Estates apartments between Jackson Drive
and Adams Street on County Road I consist of 24 apartment
units with 28 parking spaces available to those units, or
1.17 parking spaces per unit.
On the evenings of September 14th and September 16th, 1982, a
survey was taken of the parking lots for these apartment buildings
by the Mounds View Police Department. Attached is a report from
-z-
the Police Department indicating that on both of those evenings
there were numerous spaces available in the parking lots for
these apartment buildings and that the cars parking along the
City streets by these buildings could be accommodated in the
vacant spaces contained within those parking lots.
In evaluating the situation, staff feels that there is sufficient
parking available to the dwellers of these apartment buildings
should they make use of the parking lot and garage spaces provided
by their landlords. Staff would request Council authorization
to contact these apartment building owners to inform them of the
complaints the City has been receiving from residents in the area
regarding the on street parking practices of their tenants and
request that they advise their tenant: that they are to begin
making use of the off street parking provided or the City will
be forced to place parking restrictions on all residential
streets adjacent to their buildings. Your direction in
matter would be appreciated.
DFP/pf I
Attachments
TO: City Administrator and Engineer
FROM: Police Chief
DATE: September 17, 1982
RE: Parking
On 9-14-82 at 11:00 PM and on 9-16-82 at I1:00 PM, a survey had been
taken at the Greenfield and Groberg apartments.
Attached are the results.
I would recommend that the apartment building owners be contacted and
informed of the complaints we are receiving regarding their tennants
parking on the street and that they should notify them to park in the
lots or we will be forced into posting "No parking signs" on the
streets by the apartment buildings.
9 1
TO: Police Chief
FROM: Corp. Brick
BATE: September 14, 16, 1982
RE: Parking
9-14-82
23:00 Hours
I checked the parking lots of the Greenfield Apartments from 7521 to
the last one at County Road I. There were 34 unused parking planes
in the parking lot. There could even be more if the cars parked properly.
On Greenfield Ave. there were 17 cars parked nn the East side of the
Street. On the West side of the street there was only 8, they were
all South of the houses on the West side of Greenfield.
9-16-82
23:00 Hours
Groberg Apartments West of Jackson:
19 - open spaces in the lot
4 - vehicles parked on Jackson just North of County Road I.
2 - vehicles parked on St. Stephens Northbound
Greenfield Apartments 7521 building North to County Road I:
31 - empty spots in parking lot
7 - vehicles parked Southbound on Greenfield
16 - vehicles parked Northbound on Greenfield
0
•
c
A
m
m
z
m
a
G
m
L—i 24 &ARA&ES
Z3 UNIT5
I-1 SPACES
Il '5FACES
23 UNIT5
t3wt-IsoN dRI�E
6FAGE
FoR
t 30 6AF6
(UNMARKED)
a4
z4
4(0
E
0
SRONSOO AQTS.
UMM/tRKED 5pjv S
&A"&FS
ArPARTMENT UNITS
0
.7
S 8 g 8
UNlrb UNljs UtJljS UNITE 2B
R SAC ES
F
u
0
z
9 8 F 8 8
0NIT6 UNI S
L_J l.J I fR I IINITg U�'!T5
23 tFACES
PAVED AREA
2S G,' Cs
WwmaRL-
5 SPACL's
ART MOUNDS VIEW c-sTATFs
—___--- wesT OF JAGYh04 BA*r of jmw. 6ti
54 6 f A(96 28 9pr c e6
0 &AMC-66 u bAjLh&ft
4o Apr. UNITS z4 Api - UNITS
COUNTY RI> I
F
c
>a
m
m
Z.
"n
m
ti
G
11�
c
m
Iy SPACES
I"1 uNITs
7GGI �
P�
n
m
11 UNITS
7G51
I L+ ^JpAC E5
14 SPACES
IS SPAGES
17 UNITS
1&41
li UNITS
7 I
I7 UNITS
531
I1 UNITS
52
�1
GREEfJFI F1U
>�sT�TEs
;w
c
c
m
0
MARKED
SPAGES
iz(p l'JY1Ki'1�c
I25 ApAXTME
00ITs
IS SPACES
VA' Z
'1 MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Clerk -Administrator
DATE: September 23, 1982
SUBJECT: AIRPORT OPERATORS MEETING
On September 17, 1982 Mr. Tim Anderson of the Metropolitan Airports
Commission met with local base operators at the Anoka County -Blaine
Airport which staff of the City of Mounds View was invited to attend
pursuant to the agreement reached with the City Council at an earlier
meeting with representatives of the Metropolitan Airports Commission
and fixed base operators. At this meeting both myself and Building
Inspector Steve Rose, who is a trained pilot, attended to listen in
on the discussions and relate to the airport operators the problems
the City has been experiencing with flight operations over the City
of Mounds View.
The operators discussed the various problems they experience with
the use of the airport as it relates to takeoffs and landings from
the north/south runway and the present status of the operating
procedures for the Anoka County -Blaine Airport.
The following solutions were suggested by the airport operators
to reduce the amount of takeoffs and landings occurring directly
over the City of Mounds View as much as possible. These solutions,
however, will not eliminate the flyovers from occurring as operators
not using the Anoka County -Blaine Airport as their base will continue
to fly in and out of the airport resulting in flyovers over Lhe CiLy,
as well as weather conditions which might prohibit the use of other
operating procedures. The solutions suggested by the operators are
as follows:
1. When taking off to the south from the north/south runway pilots
should be instructed to take an immediate left turn at County
Road J and follow County Road J to the east along the ramp
entering the 35W freeway.
2. Establish a right hand turn procedure for takeoffs to the
north on the north/south runway which would result in landing
approaches coming from the east over the undeveloped areas of
Shoreview and following County Road J rather than approaching
to the west and flying over a large portion of the City of
Mounds View prior to their final approach over the airport.
3. Obtain funding from the Metropolitan Airports Commission for
the installation of VASI lights on the south leg of the north/south
runway. These lights are designed to let a pilot know when they
are below the 700 foot limit established by the airport, thus,
hopefully reducing or eliminatinq the number of flyovers occurring
below the 700 foot level and creating the noise problems we have
recently been experiencing.
-2-
The first two items relate to changes in the airport's operating
procedures which will be instituted as soon as possible. The
third requires that action be taken by the Metropolitan Airports
Commission and Metropolitan Council to approve the expenditure of
funds for the installation of a VASI light system. This being the
case, it would appear appropriate for the Mounds View City Council
to take a position on the proposal for a VASI light system as our
input will be requested by the Metropolitan Airports Commission and
Metropolitan Council during their approval process.
Staff would appreciate Council direction in this matter. Should
you require any additional information, please do not hesitate to
let us know.
DPP/pf
r
MEMO T0: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCI
FROM: Clerk-Administrato
DATE: September 27, 1982
SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEALTH OFFICER
As you may know, the City's Civil Defense Emergency Plan provides
for a health Service providing for the public health interest of
the City during emergency conditions. The City's Public Health
Service Officer has been Dr. Herbert Strait.
In attempting to obtain Dr. Strait's signature for the revised
Emergency Plan this office was advised that he has recently died.
Therefore, it will be necessary for the City of Mounds View to
obtain the services of a new Public Health Officer.
In light of this information, staff contacted Mr. Ray Zink,
Director of the Ramsey County Department of Public Health,and
determined that Ramsey County would be willing to serve as Public
Health Officer as they do for other cities in Ramsey County under
their agreement with the Ramsey County Department of Emergency
Services. Should Council find this direction acceptable, staff
would request your authorization to commence drafting a joint
powers agreement with the Ramsey County Department of Public
Health for their services as Health Service Officer under our
Emergency Plan.
DPP/pf
P
POPHAM. HAIK. SCHNOBRICH, KAUFMAN IS DOTY, LTD.
43441DS CENTER
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA SS402
1 \ IREPIIONL AND TELECOPIEn
0I2-333.4800
WAYNC 0 POPHAM
RAYMOND A. MAIN
ROGER W. BCMNODnic-,
DENVER KAUFMAN
DAVID B. DOTY
ROBCRT A. MINIBH
ROLFE A WORDCN
0. MARC WHITC14CAO
BRUCE D WILLIS
FREDCRICK S RICHAROS
O. ROBERT JOHNSON
GARI R. MACOMBER
ROBERT O. BURK
HUGH V PLUNKETT. III
FREDCRICK C. BROWN
THOMAS K. BERG
BRUCE D. MALKERSON
JAMES R. STCILCN
JAMCB 0. LOCKHART
ALLEN W. HINDCRAKER
CLIFFORD M. GREENE
D WILLIAM KAUFMAN
OCSYL L PEICRSON
MICHACL D FRCCMAN
THOMAS C OAOUILA
LARRY 0 CSPCL
JANIC S MAYERON
DAVID A JONES
SALLY A JOHNSON
LEE C SHEEHY
LESLIE GILLCTIE
MICIULL T NILAN
ROBERT C MOILANCJI
DAVID J. E000IST
CATHERINE A POLASKY
STEVCN G IICIKCIIS
KATILLEEN M MARTIN
NANCY J TUNITAK
JOHN C. CHILDS
THERESE AMBRHSNO
DOUOLAS P SLATOU
Mayor and City Council
City of Mounds View
2401 NE Highway 10
New Brighton, MN 55112
September 27, 1982
1600 PCTPO-LE WIS TOWER
DENVER, COLORADO 00202
TELC)NONE A40 ILLECOPICR
303•825.2000
SUITC 802.2000 L STRCCT N W
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20036
TC LC PH CAN 0 TCLCCOPIER
202.001-5I54
Re: First Reading of Proposed Wetlands ordinance
Dear Mayor and City Council:
This office represents Messrs. John and Jim Miller who
own property within the City. The value and potential use of
the property will be adversely affected by the adoption of a
wetlands ordinance in the form now proposed. My clients have
asked that I advise them as to the effect of the proposed
ordinance, if adopted, on the potential use of their property.
I have several questions concerning the ordinance which I ask
the City to answer as part of the public review of the proposed
ordinance:
1. Is 14th Draft 9/10/82, Revised 9/15/820 the most
recent draft?
2. Where is the "City of Mounds View Wetland Zoning
District Map"? We want a copy of it. (See Section
48.02 of the ordinance.)
POPHAM. HAIK. SCHNOBRICH, KAUFMAN 6 DOTY, LTD.
Mayor and City Council e
September 27, 1982
Page 2
3. Where is the "Wetland Areas of the City of Mounds
View" prepared by Ramsey Soil and Water Conservation
District, dated December, 1981? Vie want a copy of
it. (See 48.04, subd. 5.)
4. Is there a drainage way as defined in 48.04, subd. 6
on the Miller property and, if so, where?
5. What is the justification for a 100' wetland buffer
area of a wetland? (See 48.04, subd. 7.)
6. What portion of the Miller property is within the
Wetlands zoning District? (See 48.04, subd. 8.)
7. Where is the wetlands drainage district for the
Miller property? (See 48.04, subd. 9.)
8. What are the terms of the easement referenced in
48.05, subd. 4 and how will the area of the easement
be determined?
9. flow will the City determine the amount of filling
allowed pursuant to 48.06, subd. 3A and the equal
apportionment of fill opportunity? What amount will
be allowed for the Miller property?
10. If fill is allowed and the owner must first dredge
out the "bad" soils before filling, is there a need
for a dredging permit? (See 48.06, subd. 3D.)
11. What rates of discharge of storm water to the
wetland will be allowed from the Miller property?
(See 48.06, subd. 3D1 and 2.)
12. The Millers own approximately 60 acres, 45 of which
have been tentatively referred to as wetlands by the
City. The minimum lot size for the use district is
1.5 acres.
a) flow will the development density credit affect
the 1.5 acre minimum lot size? Is there 100%
transfer? Will the hardcover restrictions be
modified to allow full utilization of the density
transfer? (See 48.08; subd. 1.)
W
POPHAM, HAIK, SCHNOBRICH, KAUFMAN & DOTY, LTD.
Mayor and City Council
September 27, 1982
Page 3
b) May Millers use the "wetlands" for 100% of the
required park dedication on their property?
13. What is the legal description of the Wetland Zoning
District overall, and on the Millers' property?
(See 48.15, subd. 2.)
This ordinance should include now at least the
following:
1. Right to build parking lots in the wetland.
2. Right to use the wetland for 100% of the zoning and
subdivision requirements for:
a) Setbacks.
b) Lot area.
c) Open space.
d) Drainage areas, ponds and improvements.
e) Park dedication.
f) Floor area ratio limitations.
g) Installation of sewer and water pipes and other
public utilities.
3. A right to fill at least 50% of the wetland without
need for a variance.
The Millers object to the adoption of this ordinance and
believe it is arbitrary, unreasonable, confiscatory as to them
and their property and constitutes an unconstituitional taking
of their property rights subjecting the City and council
members voting for it to a claim for compensatory and punitive
damages, if adopted. If changes are made to the ordinance, the
Millers may not need to sue the City and council members, and
the majority of the wetlands in the City can be 'acquired' at
no cost to the City. The City Council cannot expect t•o take
all of the wetlands in the City without first paying for them.
POPHAM. HAIK,SCHNOBRICH, KAUFMAN & DOTY, LTD.
Mayor and City Council
September 27, 1982
Page 9
The Millers want to work with the City if possible. I
request that the City Council direct its staff to meet with the
Millers and me to discuss the above questions, provide answers
to them, and see if a development plan for the property can be
developed which will eliminate the need to litigate,
very truly yours,
44e U Vz 1. yx
Bruce D. Malkerson V�
BDM/jf
1429j
M
MEMO TO: The Mounds View City Council
FROM: Bruce K. Anderson, Director
Parks, Recreation and Forestry
DATE: September 30, 1982
RE: Truck specifications and City Newsletter
The final truck specifications and City Newsletter will be delivered on
Friday for the City Council's review.
It should be noted that the City Newsletter will be going to the printer
by noon on Friday so any changes or modifications the Council desires should
be called into staff by Monday morning if at all possible.
Should you have any questions, please feel free to give staff a call at
extension no. 41.
BKA/sll
MEMO TO: The Mounds View City Council
FROM: Bruce K. Anderso , r
Parks, Recreation es
DATE: September 29, 1982
RE: Dump Truck Proposals
This is just a short note to follow up on my staff memo dated September 13, 1982
regarding staff's progress regarding the purchase of a new or used dump truck.
As you are aware, staff's initial objective was to purchase a new one ton dump
truck with the $8,500.00 in revenue sharing budgeted for a 3/4 ton park vehicle
plus the $1,500.00 budgeted for the boom sprayer for the workmaster plus the
Public Works Department has indicated that they would allocate an additional
$4,500.00 - $5,000.00 that they had budgeted for the purchase of a small vehicle
in the Building Inspection division. Since that time, staff has met with City
Mechanic Schmidlin and Superintendent Kardell to discuss potential specifications
for the purchase of a new one ton dump truck and we have secured two informal
bids to determine whether or not a new truck would be feasible. As can be seen
by t111 dLL 11c'd proposals, thc^ fea'a16117t, , of purchasing a new truck, as per
our specifications, within the $15,000.00 allotment could easily be accomplished.
In addition to pursuing the purchase of a new one ton dump truck, staff has
followed up on a number of leads for used vehicles as per our past memo dated
September 13, 1982. The three used vehicles that we looked at were at Rosedale
Chevrolet, Granger's on Highway 65 and through a private party Mr. Robert Westland.
All three vehicles were larger than staff has requested, as they have two ton
chassis with full sized dump boxes except for the vehicle owned by Mr. Westland.
The vehicle located on Central Avenue by Granger's is a 1976 Ford F-600 which
apparently had recently been overhauled although they have no records indicat-
ing such. The vehicle currently has 92,600 miles and would be in need of new
tires all around with an asking price of $5,900.00. This vehicle would be a
two ton dump truck similar to our existing vehicle with a full size dump box.
The dump truck at Rosedale Chevrolet is a 1968 C-60 Chevrolet with over 100,000
miles and has a current asking price of $3,000 - $4,000. Both vehicles, as can
be noted by the mileage, have been used extensively and would be almost identical
vehicles to the city's existing two ton dump truck.
Mr. Westland is selling a 1978 Chevrolet two ton dump truck with a four -speed
manual transmission and two speed rear axle which has a contractor's dump box
with sides that flip down which would be more ideal for the type of vehicle
the city is looking for. The contractor's box is 12 feet in length and the
vehicle has approximately 42,000 miles. Mr. Westland is asking $10,000.00 for
his particular vehicle. Again, although this dump truck has the type of con-
tractor box staff would be specing, the two ton chassis is twice as large as
would be needed.
It should be noted here that the major reason staff has requested a one ton
dump truck with a contractor's box is for what we would define as the in between
chores or tasks that a Public Works Department has, i.e. dumping trash on a
weekly basis, picking up sand and ag lime in the one - two ton range, moving
playground equipment, transporting people and generally used as an all around
city vehicle. We would envision that the vehicle would be used on a daily basis
-2-
rather than the infrequent use that the current dump truck gets as it would
become the city park division's second fleet vehicle. We currently have two
Pickup trucks and the addition of the proposed one ton dump truck would be
replacing old number 315 which is a 1972 Chevrolet 112 ton park pickup truck the
division is
urrentusing,
since the second park vehicle no. 417 was
sold fall of 1981.One of the major differences that staff envisions between a one ton and two
ton chassis dump truck would be the gas mileage which would range from a low
of four to five miles per gallon for a two ton full size dump truck to approx-
imately twelve to fourteen miles per gallri for a one ton contractor box dump
truck. The difference at today's gas prices of $1.15 - $1.20 per gallon of
ten miles per gallon could prove to be quite substantial as we envision using
this vehicle on a daily basis.
Staff has attached a copy of specifications regarding the purchase of a one
ton dump truck and would request direction as to how the council would like to
in 1983.reShould9youehavepossible angeustions,purchase of an adioal new or feel free ton
ncontact staffdatehicle
extention no. 41.
BOWS11
cc: Mr. Gary Kardell, Superintendent of Public Works
Mr. Dick Schmidlin, City Mechanic
17J
A DOYFR
FORD
TRUCKS
INC.
'.'al I h 1 Wudar 1114. 111 SI I 14111111 IhSI 1 It 1
II LA:a I N I II MY(1111IIII 1 Lll
9a�z a°?C -�'
It'//Jv�r/��ti S .
Ping1wset Ihn Ivad oll it Iha Inpeol......... 11, L:. I .
RAN1 Y The Pu1rlw+vt allu-m put all ..... I....... I......• ...
v Mlluavr .I:IIL•L•IIItsil nn Ihx ful,!v, I .y ....1 I'. . a
umatisv. L. a vor of a lime sale, the 11.:.I. r .h A .. d .
..nL.Jn .rui WIIIIAI 11:llvicen IOo I'In.h.4'.....1 .I. 1'...... .
Putdlmnt is not heshv iusumd against Iwm, 1, . •e.nu.. Iq ... . .
hug,p.n ow,sl.tp ofupvomlun ul nny v. it, it R.., it r. :.,:.
TRADE IN INFORMATION
LIMITED WARRANTY
1IIII'It
Lu sold
L•.r I....,u:..:. u1 Ihv
'1
..
....... m n..:m11nA1•
u... rb,..n•lirr n.:i llryr .SNllp",
..I .n., I..bllily in conrrtc•
this •,Ah-j In I1O
•
,..,.r •. ... n,.uly Ihn huve,
I
I I . r a r., Ihn �..lu.
NO DEALER WARRANTY
.. it, ia.plivll
.: b..il a pop, %,•. This
•'.II1
.A IL.•hyar
r .. • 11 r,:span.
• ..:,. ,.., w(wo
:. ........... „ . Ilu .nlu.
ADDITIONAL TERMS
rgbhrn l'.11.1 nvdV.
ITEN CHEVROLET CO.—11'IMCKVILLM, U.S.A.
%11
6701 BROOKLYN BOULEVARD, BROOKLYN CEWEII, M. 55429
1'2 . a PHONE: (612) 56 1 1-9220
.Lv
) . . . ...........
.... ... .. . .
.. ........ .... .. ..........
Addrees................................... ...... ... ......
Tho following is a quote oil a 1,111-10 Cal, to Axle .. ............................
WITII 11JUCI-l' 1111EIANDOWN AS l"ll-LOWN:
...........
FACTORY LIST PRICE: . ... .....
Federal Excise Tax (Factor W-11) $
Freight..................................... .... .. . ...... F. .
.. ...................
Dealer DMI ............................. ... . 7
OPTION NO, ......................
........ I ......... Transinisslon (If Not ..............
................... Ellgillo .......................737) ....... .........................
........... ...
rulint—AXIii ...... ..... s 1 P . v .... ..... I / ..............................................
...............
�Le............
. ... ..................................................
.................. JIM"Xio ...........
.................... Tires (size) ........ ,%p .... . ..k!/.J. $.. . ............ .. ...... .. .................. 0
.................... ...............I................... /t.......
. .N . ......... . . ..... ......
............
. .. ................................
................
. ................... ....... I ..................... ........ . .. . ... .. . . ... ......... ........ ...............
... . ............. ........................ ... . ...... . .. ..... ** . ..........
........... ..... 4-9 . . . ....... ... . ...... ................
.................... ..... .... 7"
. ............
... . ............. . ........... . . ....... A",)
.............................................................. ...... ....... .... .............. ..............
................... ......... I ......
... . ............... ............................................................................................ ............ .............. ................. ....... ............ . . ....................
............. .................................................... ........ I ...... I .. ........... . ...... . . ......... ... .... I ..........
.................
............. I ..... .......................................................... 4. ... / .
.................... ............................................................................. .............. . .. ........ - ...... . .... . . ... .......... ... ...............................
...................................... ................................................................................... , . .......
..... .......... ..
.....................
....... //?.....Xzl............. . .................
.................... ........................ . P-I.e-,�,-: ..... e. .. - ... --j .... ,
.........................
..... ....... I. .............................. .................................................................... ..(.
�p........ * !�X .. , 1� ...... ..... .. .......... ......... . ......... ... ....................................
.........
plc(eIWV? . ,(.:yZ .:.... ................ .. ..........................................
.......... I ......... ..............................
............................................... / ..... . ... ...... ................
................... ......................................
... . ............... ....... I ........................................................ : .......... 0 ....................... ... ........................... .........
.. .... I ... I ......... .............................................................. I ....... I ........ ...................... . I .. .. ...... ". $ - .. ...... I ............ ........ . ........ ......
........... . ....... ............................................................................................. .... ... ... .. .......... . . . . . .......... .. ................................
I C/ .. . ............................ ... ...................
LIST PRICE COMM, E
............
............. ......... .................. I ..............................
LESS FLEET DISCOU
SUBTOTAL .......................E........... ..... .. . . ..... ..............................................
ESSTRADE IN NO. ......................... ....................... .... . .. ..... ... .......... —
TOTALNET DID ............ ................................. ............. — x ...... .... .... .... .......... .... ........................
. . . .. ........ ..... .... I . ..... ............. ..
Did rorqulrY No, ............................................. I .. ......
Ee
N Ee 0 ,ITEN Cl IEVROLET CO.
17 -) -> -� I . b it 30 PL