Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packets - 1982/09/07CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW CITY COUNCIL AGENDA SESSION September 7, 1982 7:00 p.m. 1. Consideration of procedures for the hiring of part-time recreational supervisors. 2. Presentation of Resolution No. 1277 by the Lakeside Park Commission. 3. Consideration of status report on 49ers Contract Negotiations. 4. Consideration of letter from North Suburban Chamber of Commerce regarding paramedic service and staff memorandum. 5. Consideration of staff memorandum on the Suburban Rate Authority Conference on the MWCC. 6. Presentation of staff responses to Cost/Benefit Study Questionnaire. 7. Update on activities of Ramsey County League of Local Governments Municipal Court Committee. 8. Staff report on proposed sale of Povlitzki's on 10 and application for on -sale liquor license transfer. 9. Consideration of staff reports regarding 1983 General Fund and Revenue Sharing Budgets. (Info will be handed out at meeting.) 10. Consideration of Planning Commission Resolution No. 58-82 regarding Senior Citizen Housing Code Amendment. 11. Consideration of staff memorandum on 1983 Contract Proposals - Mounds View Police 12. Review of Ordinance No. 316 amending the Municipal Code of Mounds View by amending Chapter 40.02, Zoning, Rules and Definitions, and Chapter 40.06, Zoning, Area and Building Size Regulations. ' RESOLUTION N0, 17.77 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA PROPOSED AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW AND THE LAKESIDE PARK COMMISSION WHEREAS, the City of Mounds View has adopted the Lakeside Park Ordinance, Chapter 50 and has worked in conjunction with the City of Spring Lake Park and the Lakeside Park Commission to administer and niaintain Lakeside Park; and WHEREAS, the Lakeside Park Commission has individually contracted with the City of Mounds View for providing administrative services to Lakeside Park by adopting Resolution No. 1277 on May 11, 1981; and WHEREAS, the Lakeside Park Commission has entered into a contractual agreement with the City of Spring Lake Park by adopting Resolution No. 81-15 for providing maintenance services at Lakeside Park on May 4, 1981; and WHEREAS, both contractual agreements are working extremely well and the need for a full time Lakeside Park Commission does not appear to be eminent at this point. NOW, THEREFORE, DE IT RESOLVED that the proposed Lakeside Park Commission `aw would consist of six members of equal representation from both cities of Spring Lake Park and Mounds View. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the six Lakeside Park Commission members be apointed for a one year period and each community would be represented on the Lakeside Park Commission by one representative from the Park and Recreation Commis- sions, ohe.representative from the City Councils and one representative from the city at large, ideally with some past experience in aquatic or beach programming. The Lakeside Park Commission should meet a minimum of three times per year. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Lakeside Park Commission would not be a policy making commission but rather have the responsibility of an advisory body working in conjunction with the related Parks and Recreation Departments. Adopted this 27th day of June, 1982 ATTEST: (SEAL) CHAIRPERSON - LAKESIDE PARK COMMISSI y SECRETARY - LAKESIDE PARK COMMISSION W ' MEMO TO: Mounds View Parks and Recreation Comnission FROM: Staff DA1:E: August 25, 1982 RE: Lakeside Park Update Enclosed is a copy of Resolution No. 1277 which is being proposed to the Mounds View City Council regarding the change in status of Lakeside Park Commission. Commissioner Oovouan will be presenting the Conuuission with a complete update on this issue, but a quick recap of the resolution is that it would take some of the management responsibilities away from the Lakeside Park Commission and put them under the responsibility of the local park and recreation departments. The other major change of the proposed resolution is that it would pro- pose a commission of six members consisting of two city councilmembers, two park and recreation commission representatives and two representatives from the city at large. The revised commission would be responsible for meeting a minimum of three times per year during the spring, mid -summer and fall to evaluate the current beach program. The bdsic reason that this type of resolution was drafted by the Lakeside ' 1' Park Commission is twofold. 1. The Commission currently having difficulty in establishing and developing quorums for their monthly agenda sessions. 2. Many of the responsibilities currently mandated by the Commission are being accomplished by the local park and recreation departments. Staff feels that the enclosed proposed draft resolution more accurately reflects the needs and current service levels that are being accomplished at the Lakeside Park Beach. Commissioner Bowman will be presenting a more in depth report for the commissioners to review at Thursday's meeting. J 61C "N2 MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Clerk -Administrator DATE: September 1, 1982 SUBJECT: STATUS OF 49ERS NEGOTIATIONS Attached please find a status report received by this office from the Chairman of the 49er Bargaining Committee for M.A.M.A. outlining the present status of our negotiations with the 49ers Union. Should you have any questions or comments regarding the informa- tion contained in this status report, please contact me so that I might provide clarification or communicate your concerns to the M.A.M.A. Negotiating Committee. DFP/pf Attachment DATE: August 26, 1982 TO: MAMA 49 City Managers FROM: Jeff Sweet, Chairman of '49 Bargaining Committee RE: Status Report on Negotiations The negotiations are currently in mediation. One mediation session has been held and a second is scheduled for September 9. The status of the Union's Demands are as follows: Demands Agreed To: 9.2 " .. seven (7) days advance notice." 18.5 Job Posting: MAMA has agreed to post jobs on designated bulletin boards but not include requirement in contract. Demands Dropped: 9.5 Any work performed on Saturday shall be compensated at the time and one- half (1 112) rate. Any work on Sunday or Holidays shall be compensated at two (2) times the hourly rate. 9.6 Shift Differential -- Shift differential for employees working on assigned shifts which begin before 6:00 AM or which end at or after 7:00 PM shall be twenty cents (E0.20) per hour for all hours worked on that shift. 10.2 The Employer must offer overtime to the employee who has the least amount of overtime credited. 15.4 Supervisor Doing Bargaining Unit Work -- The City hereby agrees that the employees' Supervisor shall do no work which would preclude regular employees from doing such work or collecting overtime pay without giving every qualified employee the opportunity to do such work. 22 Working Out of Classification -- The most senior certified Operator shall be assigned to heavy equipment first. Union Demands in Dispute: 7.7 Compensatory Time -- Time off the employees regularly scheduled work sche- dule in lieu of overtime payment at the rate of one and one-half I1 lft) hours compensatory time or eachour wore n excess o e a ours per aay or forty (40) hours oer week. V� Page 2 Union Demands in Dispute - Con't.: 16.3 Layoff Language -- There shall be one master seniority list established which shall include all employees in the bargaining unit based on their original date of hire within the bargaining unit. In the event of a layoff for any reason, permanent employees with the least seniority shall be the first to be laid off. No permanent employee shall be laid off while any temporary employee is on the payroll. (See attached 2nd offer by Union.) 15.5 Any overtime to be worked shall be offered to full-time members of the bargaining unit. 18.13 The most senior employee shall be given first consideration for any new Heavy Equipment Operator (HEO) training. 19 INSURANCE: The Employer will contribute up to a maximum of one hundred fifty dollars (E150.00) per month per employee for calendar year 1983 for group health and life insurance including dependent coverage. Retirement -- Single/dependent premium Health insurance will be paid by the Employer for all retiring persons. Any employee not using dependent coverage may have the difference between - the cost of single and dependent coverage (insurance premium paid by City) inserted into a pool to be used as Severance Pay, or to pay the retirees insurance premium. WAGES: A Cost of Living increase plus three percent (3%) (Based on the Minneapolis/St. Paul CPI, 1967 = 100) OR $1.50 across the Board increase to all classifications. (Whichever is greater.) 24 DURATION: Two (2) year agreement, open for wages and insurance on the second year. Also - Addendum (Local issues) to commence negotiations as soon as 1983 Master Contract is ratified. Management Demands in Dispute: Injury on Duty Proposal (See Attachment) Counter -Offer on Lay-off Language (See Attachment) Jeff Sweet r� Intemational Union of Operating Engineers LOCAL UNION NO. 49, 49A, 4", 4K 490 and 49E M NNESOTA s NOM DAKOTA $OVrH DAKOTA ANN" M Lp"Ia. ,--�o P, DOLVaNWI. hwWM i, 1 J• L"KNQ. V)w re"W9 CIS ,N A SOl,"VIER , R#owW4w MWdAV iK/MA'f )ON R. ►tNO WA. IIWNM �f ROBERT F. PUERWGER. DwWss MarwpnFkw)dW S"MY sets ANTNONY IANt SOMA—"EArOu1 U AWA saw Ph" (OW 78""1 COUNTER PROPOSAL TO ARTICLE 7.6 TO READ °SENIORITY; A. Employer Seniority. Length of continuous service in any of the job classifications covered by ARTICLE II of this AGgLDW. B. Job Classification Seniority. Length of service in a job classification covered by ARTICLE II - PECOGNITION of this AGLECIM. C. Upon promotion or transfer of employees to any work class covered by this AGRE[44W, seniority in a prior work class covered by this AGRUMT shall be retained and continuo to accrue. L.ayoff,vhich shall be in inverse order of seniority in each class; provided that any emplo;•oe ay exorcize seniority rights in any prevLously-held class or any other class that he is qualified to perform the duties. D. Employees who are promoted from a job classification covered by this AGWMIT and return to a job classification covered by this ACREOM shall have their seniority calculated on their length of ssrvice under this AGRZEKW for purposes of promotion, transfer and lay off and total length of service with the IDLPLOYER for other benefits under this AGRE811W. A Metropolitan Area management Affoci n of the Twin City Area I July 22, 1982 TO: I.U.O.E., LOCAL NO. 49 FROM: METROPOLITAN AREA MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION SUBJECT: INJURY ON DUTY PROPOSAL TO I.U.O.E., LOCAL NO. 49 MASTER AGREEMENT ARTICLE ( ) INJURY ON DUTY .1 Employees shall be credited with an Injury On Duty (IOD) leave bank of sixty (60) days following completion of their probationary period. 2 Employees injured while on duty through no fault of the employee shall be paid the difference between the employee's regular rate of pay and any Workers' Compensation benefits beginning with the sixth (6th) day of any injury provided the employee is eligible for Workers' Compensation benefits. .3 Such IOD payments are limited to the number of days in the employee's IOD leave bank and shall be discontinued whenever a licensed physician states that the employee is physically able to return to the employee's previous duties. 1 r • fir.,, metropolitan Area Management bociaiic of the Twin City Area July 7, 1982 TO: I.U.O.E., LOCAL NO. 49 FROM: Metropolitan Area Management Association SUBJECT: PROPOSALS TO I.U.O.E., LOCAL 00. 49 1. Language changes based on I.U.O.E., Local No. 49 concerns and proposals. a. Change ARTICLE 7.6 to read: "SENIORITY: A. Employer Seniority. Length of continuous service in any of the job classifications covered by ARTICLE II of this AGREEMENT. B. Job Classification Seniority. Length of service in a job classificatj.on covered by ARTICLE II - RECOGNITION of this AGREEMENT. C. Service in a higher job classification within the same job family will be counted as service in any lower job classification within the same job family. D. Employees who are promoted from a job classification covered by this AGREEMENT and return to a job classificatio covered by this AGREEMENT shall have their seniority calculated on their length of service under this AGREEMENT for purposes of promotion, transfer and lay off and total length of service with the EMPLOYER for other benefits under this AGREEMENT." PROPOSALS TO I.U.O.E., LOCAL No. 49 -2- b. Change ARTICLE XV to read: "ARTICLE XV LAY OFF July 7, 1982 i5.1 Job classification seniority will be the determining criterion for lay-offs only when all job -relevant qualification and performance factors are equal. 15.2 Recall rights under this provision will continue for twenty-four (24) months after lay off. Recalled employees shall have ten (10) working days after notification of recall by registered mail at the employee's last known address to report to work or forfeit all recall rights." 2. Economic Proposal. a. Wage Rates Increase all master contract rates effective the first payroll period for 1983 by three percent (3%). b. Insurance Increase the 1982 contract amount of $105.00 to $110.00 for 1983. 4 MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council n FROM: Clerk-Administrato DATE: September 1, 1982 SUBJECT: PARAMEDIC SERVICES Attached please find a letter from the Suburban Area Chamber of Commerce relating to the cost of paramedic services to the residents of the northern suburbs of Ramsey County. Staff would request Council direction with respect to the following items: 1. Your response to the two points outlined in the attached letter. 2. The method in which you wish the City to respond to this letter, i.e., attend the meeting on September 17th, communicate our response in written form, or both. DFP/pf Attachment ERVWC WENTY-Tl, oO BURBAN OMMUNITIES ., ultra Conuudle" 1 ':IIIrNI (AIRMAN or TIN' BOARD ,rI s,•, ,,. �, rGnnrar, I PRESIDENT I•ollen rn.n• nvinslnnr s�agrh F ASURER I . slenn•1 , A AB>,,,ah•s CHETARY 'bled .:r P.11d,n. r, nnwlm rr�, I I'INIVr VICE PRESIDENT . 11,1011111 and of Dlreclom i Powicr nd Pnrunrahc fuucPYrng , mrmh�u ! ILnrF Srdh• i 1,pr50n uan,n r .rscalenda !b in Sidles Powal Cu covey •.^�'v Transfer Cmporaoon Da111rl,rrsl r'mmey Company -- rascrana ! ,eyer A ! ling Panting �'hel ..:n,• Slydn Bank oumier •nn Uwlsum UOP Inc. .-•Y Kanh , Ruhbeul I u nvalurg r� l abeleslia la,o Mills I„r m Nygren "lids View Public Schools iuluun Rauonhorsl nnr Ilisdall Ilrsdatl Advorhsing I,• Rygh • h IVodd — Minnesota Slate I •, Woellge Ranh St. Paul _j August 24, 1982 Suburban Area, C1iarnber of Coni nero I•'+1+�' !"41"r';'•<t.lil hVll I MINNESUTA 5511.1 iIIfIH1UNr 1;17.489 I313 1i Mr. Donald Pauley Clerk Administrator Mounds View 2401 Highway 10 Mounds View, MN 55112 Dear Donald: Please join me on y, September FStir, at 7:30 a.m., for a discussion of paramedic service concerns. We will meet at Cherettets Restaurant, 3 E. Little Canada Road, Little Canada. Several years have past since the start of the North Suburban (Health Central) Paramedic Service. The rising costs are an unfortunate part of the service. When it started,a heart attack case cost $200 and now the current cost is $450. Our business group was one of the original supporters of the service. I need to know how your city feels about these two points of view: I. Patient pays for all paramedic costs. 2. City and patient share in paying costs. Is your city willing to use tax dollars to offset increasing paramedic costs for those that use the service? I hope we can discuss these thoughts together. RSVP by Friday '-S tember 3rd. Call 483-1313, Best regards �? BucholZ Execul.ive Vice ent _. 1. i AOf 1611 u' I - ,.-AY 111 ML i I Id AI I II ES Of 7 I i JIS TIME CC MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Clerk-Administrato DATE: September 1, 1982 SUBJECT: SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY CONFERENCE ON THE MWCC Attached please find an outline of the Suburban Rate Authority's Conference on the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission scheduled for September 24, 1982. You will note that the registration fee for this Conference is $15.00 and must be submitted no later than September 17, 1982. Please advise me of your desire to attend this meeting at your Agenda Session on September 7th so that appropriate registration forms and fee payment might be submitted by that date. At this time both myself and Mr. Johnson have indicated a desire to attend this Conference. DFP/pf Attachment LAW OFrICEs LEFEVERE,LEFLER, KENNEDY, O'BRIEN 6 DRAWZ CLAYTON L.LLFEVCRC A PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION MERS[RT P. LEFLER 2000 FIRST BANK PLACC WCST J. DENNIS O'BRICN JOHN E.ORAwE MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 DAVID J. KENNEDY JOHN B.DLAN TEL[PMONC (R12).10L01A2 OLCNN [,PURDUE RICHARD J. SCNIEFFCR CHARLES LA9FEVERC Q MERBCRT P. LEFLER 0 JAMES 1MEARA V III JAMCS P. 0'M CARA J � MARY J. DJORKLUND JOHN D.ARCBBCL 11 August• 25, 1.982 1 ; CINDY LAAVORAYO •• CT7 MICIIAEL A. NASH I (j) LUK[ R.KOMAREK ,I JOAN N.CRICKSEN ELT[ADCTM O.MORAN 1 I.II Memorandum to SRA Members: I enclose a copy of the Announcement of our Conference on the MWCC. Please give the conference the proper publicity in your city. Registration should be sent promptly, if possible. Very tr�ly yours, Glenn E. Purdue GEP:jdn Enclosure SPOTLIGHT ON THE METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMMISSION 8:30 a.m. - 4:30 p,m., September 24, 1982 Hopkins House, 1501 Highway 7, Hopkins Sponsored by: The Suburban Rate Authority The Association of Metropolitan Municipalities The Council of Metro Area Leagues of Women Voters The Metropolitan Waste Control Commission The Metropolitan Council The Citizens League The St. Paul Area Chamber of Commerce The Greater Minneapolis Chamber of Commerce The Metropolitan Inter -County Association The organization of a conference on the MWCC began with a Resolution of the Board of ➢irectors of the Suburban Rate Authority to assemble such a conference for the purpose of creating a forum for a discussion of MWCC operations, spending and future sewer rates. The SRA also resolved to seek the assistance of others whose perspectives would ensure that the conference will become known as an example of metropolitan cooperation. The additional sponsors have participated extensively in the planning and execution of the conference. PROGRAM: 8:30 a.m. Late registration at the door. 9:00 a.m. Morning Session opening remarks. Clayton L. LePevere, Attorney, fepevere, Lefler, Kennedy, O'Brien & Drawz, Morning Session moderator 9:05 a.m. Orientation to the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission; its history, organization and the regulatory framework within which it must operate. Salsbury Adams, Chairman of the MWCC 9:30 a.m. fWCC costs, funding and the basis for sewer charges. Richard L. Berg, MWCC Controller 10:00 a.m. Oversight of the MWCC; present relationships. Representative Gordon Voss, Chairman, House Local and Urban Affairs Committee 10:15 a.m. Morning break 10:30 a.m. Panel discussion: Is there a need for additional oversight? Is there a need for a dispute -resolution mechanism? Representative Connie Levi, District 55A Roger Martin, Director of Environmental Engineering, Sperry Ilnivac Charles Weaver, Chairman, Metropolitan Council .lance;: Willis, Cily Manager, City of Plymouth 11:30 a.m. Qneslion and Answer Session. Morning speakers and panelists Noon: Lunch (provided). 1:00 p.m. Afternoon Session opening remarks. Mary Anderson, President, Association of Metropolitan ^) MunicipaIiLies, Afternoon Session moderator 1:05 p.m. Requirements of the state and federal governments. Louis J. Breimhurst, Executive Director, MPCA Robert Foxen, Consultant and formerly with the EPA 1:45 p.m. Issues before the MWCC, capital construction, alternatives and anticipated sewer rates. George Lusher, Chief Administrator, MWCC. 2:15 p.m. Afternoon break. 2:30 p.m. Panel discussion: Reactions to previous presentations. Graydon Boeck, Consulting Engineer Harold B. Field, Jr., attorney, Leonard, Street & Deinhard, former chairman, MPCA Barbara Lukerman, consultant, former chairman, MWCC Brad Robinson, Robinson Rubber Products Co. Paul Scheunemann, Mayor, City of Burnsville 3:20 p.m. Question and Answer Session. Afternoon speakers and panelists 4:00 p.m. Closing remarks. Curtis Johnson, Executive Director, Citizens League REGISTRATION AND INFORMATION The $15 registration fee includes lunch. Registration without lunch is $10. Refunds will be made if Lanctllation is received not later than September 17. Registrations will be taken at the door, if space is available, but advance registration is strongly suggested. Questions concerning registration should be directed to Phyllis Letendre, 739-1781, 2148 Lamplight Drive, Woodbury, Minnesota 55125, Questions concerning the conference should be directed to Clayton LeFevere or Glenn Purdue, 333-0543. ADVANCE REGISTRATION SHOULD BE HAILED NOT LATER THAN SEPTEMBER 15, MWCC Conference Send to: Phyllis Letendre Registration $15 (without lunch $10) 2148 Lamplight Dr. Checks payable to "HWCC Conference" Woodbury, NN 55125 Please register the following individuals: Name Address Name and phone number of contact: Organization Fee Total enriosca S_ F MEMO TO: City Council/Wetland Committee FROM: public Works/Community Development Director DATE: September 2, 1982 SUBJECT: RESPONSES TO COST IMPACT ANALYSIS Attached are the City department draft responses to the Cost Impact Analysis Study Questionnaire. Should you have specific questions after review of the material, please let staff know so that they may be reponded to as soon as possible. Have a nice weekend. /be Attachments MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council Wetlands Committee Director of Public Works/Communit Development Johnson FROM: Clerk -Administrator Pau e DATE: August 23, 1982 SUBJECT: RESPONSES TO COST IMPACT ANALYSIS STUDY QUESTIONNAIRE ADMINISTRATION AND FINANCE: 1. Status of Current Services A. In general it can be stated that Mounds View's overall public service delivery system is able to meet the demands of the community, however, that is not to say that all necessary or desirable work is getting done. Quite often some work is being delayed for indefinite periods of time in order that those items determined to be of greater importance or more urgent in nature be completed first. B. In general it can be stated that the departments included under Administrative Services (Administration and Finance) are at capacity. There are times that these departments have slack periods as well as times when the workload exceeds the ability of the depart- ment to complete the work in a timely fashion, however, in balance the Administrative Services departments of the City are at capacity as it relates to workloads. 2. Number of Staff; Costs of Staff Administration: One - Clerk -Administrator $31,030/year One - Administrative Secretary $7.03/hour; $14,622/year One - Receptionist (part-time) $3.50/hour; $ 5,198/year Finance: One - Finance Director $29,823/year One - Accountant $7.35/hour; $15,301/year -2- 3. Percentage Distribution of Service Resources by Land Use 2 R-1 Single Family - 20% R-3 Townhouses - 10% R-4 Multi -Family - 20% Mobile Homes - 20% Commercial - 15% Industrial - 10% Vacant Land - 5% 4. The Administration Department would most likely respond to the four different types of development in the following ways. In the areas of residential development, additional workloads would be experienced in areas where records are kept on an individual basis, e.g., election registration and possibly in the general workload when responding to inquiries, etc. Purely industrial development would not place any foreseeable additional workload as present industrial users have minimal impact on this department. Commercial development will, depending on type, cause for additional workloads to be experienced because of the licensing requirements of the City. The Finance Department would experience an increase in workload as a result of the following: A. If public improvements were publicly financed, addi- tional work would be necessary in maintaining financial records for the bond sale, improvement project, and debt service. B. The Finance Department would experience an increase in the number of water and sewer accounts, with the exact number depending upon the type of development and method of billing. Present practices of the City would result in a larger number of accounts occurring in sinUle family developments and reducing for other tyres f development based on the number of buildings to be Gervica' rather than the number of units. A general observation can be made that any type of development will most likely result in an increase in the level of service being provided by these two departments, however, it is very difficult to quantify exactly what the impact will be as a large amount of our work relates to dealing with the public on an irregular and unpredictable basis. -3 - FIRE DEPARTMENT: Based on a telephone conversation with Pat Allen, only certain questions are being responded to by the Fire Department due to our contractual relationship and their not being a City Depart- ment. The responses shown are as a result of an interview with Deputy Chief Wes Cox on August 19, 1982. 1. Status of Current Services A. Deputy Chief Cox indicated that the Spring Lake Park - Blaine - Mounds View Fire Department presently has a full complement of firemen and all of its equipment and buildings are up-to-date. This statement was made on the basis of what the present needs are of the area served by the Fire Department. B. The Fire Department is presently at. capacity. 3. Attached is a copy of the Fire Department's 1981 report which on page 32 lists the total number of fire calls in Mounds View by month and type. Deputy Chief Cox indicated that the percentage of type of call as it relates to the total number of calls would provide for the percentage distribution of service resources. 9. Deputy Chief Cox indicated that the present level of manpower and equipment could easily meet the service needs of any additional single-family or townhouse development in Mounds View. In the case of multi -family, commercial or industrial, the present level of manpower and equipment might need to be increased depending upon the specific type of use, size and height of building, and level of internal fire protection. As specific direction could not be given in response to these variables Depty Chief Cox was unable to give any specific response to the question. DFP/pf `erg" MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council/Wetlands Committee FROM: John C. Johnson n DATE: September 1, 1982 ` SUBJECT: RESPONSES TO COST IMPACT STUDY QUESTIONNAIRE Municipal Service Categories General Government: Planning Community Development Engineering Public Works 6 Utilities: Streets Water System Sanitary Sewer System Storm Sewer 1. Status of Current Services A. Currently in both General Government areas and in Public Works, existing personnel levels and equipment are meeting the needs and demands of the community. Although this may require prioritization of service needs and resulting in a timing schedule, all major tasks or services are made or completed within tolerable time limits. Existing qualifications and expertise of staff together with selective use of con- sultant work or laborers allows for a reasonable level of service delivery. B. The area of Public Works may be understaffed depending on service expectations and the use of seasonal laborers. Presently, staffing levels include two men in water and two men in sewer, streets and storm sewer. Depending on service demands in the area of streets, sewer and storm sewer and the use of seasonal laborers, additional staffing might be necessary. To date, due to the shared experience of the Public Works staff, demands have been met reasonably. 2. Number of Staff; Costs of Staff (see chart on Page 2) (004-1 Mayo d City Council • Page 2 September 1, 1982 Maintenance Building Engineering/ Utility Engineer Man Inspector Technician Secretary Billing Clerk Salary - Annual Rate $20,217.60 $24,500.00 $17,301.00 $12,126.40 $15,412.80 Salary - $22.50 9.72 11.78 8.31 5.83 7.41 Hourly Rate FICA .65 .79 .56 .39 --- PERA •53 .65 .46 .32 .59 Insurance .60 .60 .60 .28 .60 Workman's Comp. .27 .21 .15 .01 .01 Uniforms 08 --- --- --- --- 1982 - Total 22.50 11.85 14.03 10.08 6.83 8.61 Hourly Rate 1983 - SB $22.50 $12.44 $14.73 $10.58 $7.17 $9.04 Increase 3. Average Percent of Monthly Service Calls Per Unit Commercial 6 R-1 R-•2 R-3 R-4 Mobile Homes Industrial Vacant Streets 95% 18 18 1% 18 1% 19 Utilities 80% 18 18 33 2% 3% 18 Percent of Distribution of Service Resources by Land Use i Miyol A City Council Page 3 September 1, 1982 Commercial & R-1 R-2 R-3 R-4 Mobile Homes Industrial Vacant Public Works/ 54% 18 18 '38 4% 5% 33% Community Development & Engineering - General Govrnmt. Streets 95% 18 18 1% 1% 18 1% Water 61% 78 78 10% 10% 12% 08 Sewers 61% 78 78 10% 10% 12% 08 • These percentages are based on an acreage ratio by use of land within Mounds View with modifications based on staff experience. Percent of Distribution of Services by Land Use Commercial & R-1 R-2 R-3 R-4 Mobile Homes Industrial Vacant General 64% 28 28 88 18% 78 08 Government Streets 95% 18 18 18 1% 1% 18 Water 64% 2% 28 88 18% 7% 0% Sewers 64% 28 28 8% 18€ 7% 08 Comments The use of acreage by use compar_so.^.s is probably S.ora accurate as it pCrtains to gcncral government while the water usage tends to be more accurate for water and sewers. The distribution for streets remains the same in both cases because an excess of 95% of streets in Mounds View maintained by the City are residential in nature. Mayor 1 City Council Page 4 September 1, 1982 4. Increase in Service Needs Based on Sewer and Water Usage R-1 - 48 R-2 - 98 R-4 - 13% Industrial - 1.34% Commercial - 1.23% Increase in Service Needs Based on Acreage Comparisons to Existing Uses R-1 - 6% R-2 - 5% R-4 - 78 Industrial - 58 Commercial - 68 Comments 0- The above estimates are based on the previously stated service distribution in Question #3. Unlike the existing distribution in Question #3 which demonstrated a resemblance in values in comparing water usage and land acreage, the percentages above do not. The water/sewer usage comparison is similar to the distribution of Question #3, while the land acreage tends to indicate the same increase irrespective of the use. 5. Capitol Costs A. Sanitary Sewer B. Storm Sewer 6" - 8" main 8' - 15' deep $21.78 18" - 21" size 4' - 10' deep $12.22 M$yl.nd City Council Page 5 September 1, 1982 C. Water System D. City Streets 6" - 8" main Minimum 7' deep $20.46 Concrete Curb & Gutter Combination Resi- dential and Commercial $48.24 The above costs reflect a front footage costs assessed to both sides of a street. costs are derived from the Silver Lake Woods Project. /bc MEMO TO: Mr. John Johnson, Public Works Director/Engineer FROM: Bruce K. Anderson, Director Parks, Recreation and Forestry DATE: September 2, 1982 RE: Gunnar Isberg and Associates Study STATUS OF CURRENT SERVICES A. From a park and recreation perspective, Mounds View's current public service delivery system is meeting the current demands of the residents. Although our current park facilities are not of the highest quality, they are able to meet the present recreational and leisure time demands for our community. B. Specific areas which are at capacity would include our recreation pro- grams on a year round basis. In addition our city forestry program is currently functioning at what I would consider an adequate level. Facilities that are currently being over atilized would include our adult softball program, as we currently dr, not have an adequate number of athletic fields to meet the adult softball demand. The two adult softball fields at City Hall are currently used to a greater level than the facilities were built for, which does not allow for city picnic or tournament usage. Our neighborhood parks are being used as "athletic complexes", which does not allow for local neighborhood play. Specific recreation facility needs that are not being met include youth soccer, football and hard court games; i.e. tennis, hard court volleyball, etc. We currently do not have any of the aforementioned facilities in the city park system excluding school district facilities. The other major area of which we have over utilization would be our indoor facilities. Staff did complete a detailed study of our current gym- nasium usages which has been included for your review. As can be noted, the indoor facility usage is currently inadequate during the peak time usage with the closing of feed Oak Elementary School. Specific diffi- culties that occur because of this gymnasium space shortage include overscheduling of teams in gym spaces and denial of many neighborhood as well as community group activities. Facilities that are currently under utilized would be school classroom facilities for a variety of community and recreation program uses and existing city warming house buildings beyond the ten or twelve week winter skating program. The question is raised as to what additional R-4 or single family res- idential impact would have on our current park system, especially for the over utilized areas. The impact would be felt greatest in the area of indoor activities where gymnasium space would be required as well as placing future greater demand on our recreation programming staff. Staff feels that with the addition of Silver View Park and the facilities that park will afford us, we will be able to meet all the needs of additional single family development with our current park system, except where Memo to John Johnson September 1, 1982 Page two additional impact will be placed on indoor facilities. The next question that is raised is how additional residential development will impact the costs for future park systems improve- ments. The obvious response to that is that through the city's current park availability charge which occurs during the subdiv- ision of property; the city receives either a 10 percent land dedication or cash equivalent. Staff feels that the current park availability charge is adequate and it is an equitable and fair way to spread the costs of future park development over the future years. It should be noted that our current park maintenance division is greatly below capacity. We currently have two full time park maintenance men, which are not able to meet the current demands of our park system. Any future development would directly impact park usage which would in turn place a greater demand on our park maintenance staff. In addition to our two full time maintenance men, we have approximately ten summer C.E.T.A. employees which have proved to be invaluable. The ten C.E.T.A. employees which we have had for the past four years re- present approximately $18,000 in staff time and should that program ever dissolve, or be reduced in staff, our department would suffer immeasur- ably due to the loss of their time. Staff also has two part time employees who supervise the summer C.E.T.A. crew which has proven to be adequate in the past summers. Staff cannot stress strongly enough the tremendous impact that the reduction or elimination of the summer C.E.T.A. program would have on our current department as we would be unable to meet many of our current basic maintenance services. II. NUMBER OF STAFF; COSTS OF STAFF We currently have three and one-half full time equivalent employees within our department plus two full time park maintenance men. The full time positions are as follows: Parks and Recreation Director - Bruce Anderson . . ... $ 27,500.00 Program Supervisor - Mary Saarion . . .... ..... 17,197.00 Department Secretary - Sharon Linke ..... .. .. . 12,400.00 City Forester - Richard Wriskey . . . . ... .. .. . 10,200.00 Two park maintenance employees ... . .... .. ... 21,228.00 It should be noted that the salaries that were listed do not include fringe benefits, except for the city forester which is included through his current contractual arrangement. It should also be noted that the city forester is 40 percent time. Memo Jo John Johnson September 1, 1982 Page three III. SERVICE PROVIDED BY DEVELOPMENT LEVEL TYPE LAND USE TYPE PARKS & OPEN SPACE RECREATION R-1 Single Family 55% 40% R-3 Townhouses 5% 10% R-4 Multi -family 20% 30% Mobile Homes 10% 10% Commercial 5% 5% Industrial 5% 5% Vacant Land 0% 0% IV. Staff does not feel that there would be a great deal of different service levels for the different types of developments other than we have experienced greater use of our recreation program through multiple family development. The reason for this occurrence is that multiple family; i.e. apartment complexes, townhouses, condo- minium development, etc., tend to attract a younger, more mobile family which has younger children which in turn make greater use of our department, i.e. specifically our recreation programs. Other than that, we do not feel that the four development altern- atives would have a major impact on our services other than a potential greater influx of younger people. V. In responding to average capital costs for our current park equip- ment facilities, these are extremely difficult to determine, which I am sure you can appreciate. The majority of our park system is currently developed at a minimal level and to provide costs levels, as stated earlier, is most difficult. The staff has included the cost estimates to complete the park system as per our parks and open space plan which was completed in 1980. Total cost is 2.553 million dollars and staff feels that the costs that were reflected in 1980 are still current today in 1982. Staff -does not envision any additional acquisition of property so All of the cost estimates would be for park development which are listed in the attachments. Should you have any questions regarding our departments position on these issues, please give me a call at extension 41 so that you are familiar with the issues at hand. BKA/slI -' tjx' 6 TO: Pat Allen, Gunnar Isberg (Planning Consultant) FROM: Mounds View City Staff DATE: August 3, 1982 RE: Answers to questions for Cost Impart Analysis Study The Mounds View Police Department is currently operating at capacity. In recent years the size of the Police Department has not increased proportionately,with the increased activity and population of the City. Any new development would put added strain on the Police Department, if it remained at the current size. The Police Department keeps many records, however, we do not break down activities according to land use. As far as the Police Department is concerned, there are to many variables to consider to justify that type of record keeping. In summary, it is impossible to predict which type of land use would �J have more of an effect on the Police Department. ITEM MEMO TO: Clerk-AdministraLor and City Council FROM: Director of Public Works/Community Development DATE: September 1, 1982 SUBJECT:• Zoning Code Amendment/Senior Citizen Housing Attached for your review and consideration is Planning Commission Resolution No. 58-82 regarding proposed 'Zoning Code additions for senior citizen housing. The Planning Commission adopted this reso- lution to provide a means to regulate senior citizen housing, should another such development be proposed in the future. Specifically addressed is the parking requirements for seniors. The proposed parking admendment of one space per unit was the basis for approving a variance from 100 to 40 spaces. Please review the proposed Code amendment and direct staff as to procedure for adoption. Either adopt by ordinance this amendment itself or adopt this amendment along with the rest of Chapter 40. Should you go with adopting by ordinance the amendment itself, staff should be directed to draft the ordinance and set the public hearing date. Should adopting the amendment along with the rest of Chapter 40 be preferrable, Council could approve this amendment and it will be included in the revised Zoning Code for total adoption at a later date. /bc Attachments r MUNNNS V I RN PI.ANN I NI; l'uhlr•I I:,:, I UIr I;I;:u)I,II'I'IUfJ NO. 'At-II2 l'I'I'S IIV Mt)IIIVUG VIP:W l'olltIT of kAI•I:;I,: :;TATX. OF M I NNE.:;0TA RESOLUTION ItE.CIIMMLNNINC THE AM!'NNI!!(i TO CHAP'11;k •11) Of' THE MOUNDS VIEW 141INICIPAI, Cnlil: I!I{tiAItUIN(; :;VHll')R CI'I'IV,111 IIOOJIII;; WHEREAS, Ihv lily ul M,mnd:; Vi,•w li•c. l•" iv I a rf•,Inu:;l. Lo construct a 40 unit senior c:il:iz,:n housilIll hroj,•cl; ilnd WHEREAS, the Mound:; Vicw Mnnicill;ll ('011" dw'n not addr(,-ns design criteria for senior ciLizon honsilill in its zoning sections; ' and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds Lhc need to regulate Lhusu types of devulopmonL;; from a zoui.nq l,ur:;I)cxLivc; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has met, and is recommending, that senior citizen housing be .included a:; it condiLional use in an R-4 residential district; and WHEREAS, following suevcy:; conducted of other :;cnnor citizen ' projects in the meLropoli.tan area, the Planning Commission has esLablished a definition for senior c.il.i•rrn hou:;ing and also specific parking requirements; NOW, '1'IILRL•'PORL, BE IT RE!;OLVLII LhaL Lhc lotluwing code clarifications arc being rccunmlcndcl: 40.02, Subd. 13 (al.1 dcfiniLions fol.10winy n:nior citizen } housing would be renumbered) ; Senior CiLizen liollniw,l. A rc:;iduul.i:ll hnn:;iny devolupnlent., or that porLion of a housing devidopmcnL, ill •ahic)l 60 percent or more of Lhe uniLs are designud for Occupnucy by individu- als over 60 years of age or by ill cadarly coulslo with On(' or both members over 60 years of. age (40.13, Subd. O). 40.07, Subd. Il (20) Senior CiL.izen (lousing. At load. .I LOL,11 of. ouu (l) space per housing unit fneludi.ng not 1cn:; th;ul one (1) designated handicapped space per handicapped housing unit and at least 25% of. Lhc total SINICV:; :;hall be no torn than 11' by 20' or equivalent angle stall, ine:luding the designated handicapped spaces. 40.13, Subcj. D (4) Senior Citizen Ilon:tinii Mounds View Planning Commission August 4, 1982 Regular Meeting Page Two ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Technician Kampel reported the architect, Bruce Tunell, has presented plans showing where the parking spaces would be located, There was considerable discussion among the Commissioners regarding the number of parking spaces io be required for the development, with the concensus being one per unit, or 40 spaces. Technicial Kampel stated the developer had submitted the plans to HUD showing 26 parking spaces, with HUD approving the project based on that site plan. lie added that per Resolution No. 58-82, 40 parking spaces would be required, while under the R-4 section of the code, 100 parking spaces would be required, and while the resolution grants a variance from 100 to 40 parking spaces, the developer is counting on a change order to fund the additional required parking spaces, which could be added in following commencement of the project. Mr. Tunell stated they would like to go ahead with 26 spaces, and if it is felt the additional 1.4 spaces are required once the project is complete, they could add them then. He also explained the budget difficul- ties they have been having with the project, and the paperwork and red tape involved in getting HUD to finance the additional parking spaces. It was the concensus of the Planning Commission that 40 parking spaces should be required, one per unit, and it should be sent to HUD that way, with the Planning Commission being willing to meet with whoever was necessary to get the parking situation resolved. Motion/Second: Warren/Anderson to adopt Resolution 0 5F3T.. - 5 ayes 0 uays Motion/Second: Linke/Anderson to adopt Resolution A_0�7TT2 5 ayes 0 nays Motion/Second: Mountin/Warren to forward the infor- mation to the City Council, as soon as possible, with a copy to the Planning Commission. Health Central, Inc./Unity Medi cal Center, 255 Mounds View Dr, Development Pro posal (Elderly lisg. Project, 4 Units), Varianc Request (Parkin Requirements), R-4, High Densi Residential Dst Case 112-82 Motion Carried Motion Carried 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried •�„ '.Mo:mik; view I'Iannirnl Cunnnin::iun Resolution No. 51142 Page 2 ATTEST: a, Fixl:y portent ur muro Ill Iho nail::, I'Xrlu::iv'• of .Illy uceupicd by I,hv c;n'eLtlor, nh.tll be dasitloaLud for uccup;utc:y by Iho cldarly lur .t dur;:[ion ul' :tL lea:;L tell years. No amendment to Iho condil.ional u:;c permit that ehanyu:; Lhc d siynal.iuu ul Lhc.^,c nniL; for occupancy by the cldrrly :;hill bo made wilhin Lon yo.tr:;. Ally :tucli nulondnu:nt afler Lon years mull he adopLed by a 4/5 vote of file uu'mbolo, of Lho Cil.y t:uonciI. b. 1f required by the. City, Lhe owocr Of' Lhu properly shall 1'CCn I'd ❑ cuvouan[ Liu lho pt:upel:Ly exccu Lad in a form npprovotl by Iho Cil'y which indic;tles the fact: that the property is dusignated for occupancy by the elderly. V. The development in ;t:;sisted by t.ho U.S. Uopartmenl' of Housing and Urban buvulopmenl undor uuu or its program:, for hou::iuy lot•, .oil nunhor.:h• inrtim- oldi-rly ur nuch housintl i:; c:on::l.ruatod and/or opt-ralod by a profit or a non-pruliL uriianizaLiun which can dt•munnLraLc experirnor and ;: cnuunilmonl. to hou::iml for the eldcrl.y, and provided :;uch a,loncy shall record at least a 20-year covenatil. and otho: land n:;I: t:onlrol:; Lill the property, erccuLod in it futm approved by Iho City, '::hiclt will. limit �\ use of the properly or a portion thercor to the occupancy r by the uldurly undur the Lcim:; of I.hc provi!;iuns govc:roiny senior citizen housing. d. The devolopnu-Ill provide:: fur a lonmp or olhor l.n::.ido common areas amounting to aL Ina::t 15 :;quart feet for each un.iL. e. The development is provided with other spocial features which mcuL Lhc nuod:; of low and mudcratu income aldurly person n. C. The site nhall be of. adayuaLe :;izu to accommodate Chc required number of parl:inl spaces should the facility convert to other R-4 permitted uses, and will meet. the requirements of SecLiun 40.05, "Yard ReyuircmcnL's". Adopted this 40 day o1 AuyusL, 1902. -- (SEAL) I'uhlic wurl;n/Cumi:itiiiiLy�UavcLn�itiieliE /■ � Iti: �•rlo: , cc: Police Chief Grabowski MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council � •�� �� FROM: Clerk -Administrator DATE: August 20, 1982 SUBJECT: 1983 CONTRACT PROPOSALS - MOUNDS VIEW POLICE Attached please find a copy of the 1983 Contract Proposals from Teamsters Local No. 320. The following is an analysis of their proposals and observations on their desirability and/or reasonableness: 1. Insurance A. The City's present level of contribution is $105 per month. An increase of $20 per month is not within present budget guidelines. B. For the City to pick-up 50% of any new premium increases, the obvious result would be an automatic increase in the insurance contribution without any control by the City Council. C. The difference between the cost of single coverage ($99.50 per month) and the $105 per month City contribution, r which is less than the cost of family coverage, is $55.50. In 1982 the City budgeted only for the cost we experience per employee. The obvious result of this proposal would be increased personnel costs for the City. 2. Clothing and Maintenance Allowance A. The present clothing allowance is $275 per year which is felt to be more than sufficient to provide adequate clothing for any of our officers. It had been increased $50 over the past two years. B. The inclusion of the requirement that the City pay for the replacement or repair of all clothing, watches or eyeglasses damaged in the line of duty presents two thoughts for consideration. 1) Isn't it the intention of the uniform allowance to provide funds for the maintenance of an officer's uniforms? If so, this requirement would then be a subsidy in addition to the uniform allowance. 2) As we do not accept responsibility for the watches and eyewear of other employees whose work is of a nature where they can damage these items, why should we accept responsibility for the police on these items? -2- 3. Eliminate the Injury on Duty Waiting Period J There is presently a five day waiting period before Injury on Duty benefits will be paid. These five days are charged to the employee's sick leave account. The purpose of the waiting period is to discourage abuse of the benefit and to limit its use to those injuries of a more serious nature for which it was intended. To eliminate it would potentially open it up to abuse and misuse. 4. The present vacation schedule for the police is: 0 - 5 years service 10 days per year 6 - 10 years service 15 days per year Over 10 years service An additional day per year not to exceed 20 days The proposal provides for substantial changes which would place additional burdens on the City in two ways: A. This schedule would be different from all other employees and require special procedures for maintaining accurate records. B. More importantly, with a small force such as ours, vacation time places a burden on our ability to provide adequate coverage. An increase in the amount of vacation hours would exacerbate that burden. 5. The City's present practices with relationship to holidays has been within the 2080 hours worked during a year and not required any additional costs or loss of work hours. The proposal as presented would most likely result in additional costs to the City or, if time off is given, a reduction in our available manpower. 6. Wages A. The investigator presently receives an additional $90 per month. B. Corporals presently receive an additional $80 per month. C. The requested 8%, although more reasonable than the other union proposals we have received, is 39 greater than Lhat being discussed in the 1983 budget. Should you have any direction or comments on these proposals, I would appreciate receiving them so that they can be forwarded to our M.A.M.A. negotiating team. Drp/pf Attachmr '' MINNESOTA TEAMSTERS PUBLIC & LAW ENFORCEMENT EMPLOYEES UNION r LOCAL NO.320 1 e effilieled with she , '•I" INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, CHAUFFEURS, WAREHOUSEMEN I HELPERS OF AMERICA 3001 University Avenue S.E. — Minneapolis, Minnesota 55414 — Phone (612) 331-3873 August 13, 1982 (- .p_"1(; i( Mr. Donald p. paisley City Administrator !t� 2401 highway 410 �6�'81�Z91�ti� Mounds View, MN 55112 Re: 1983 Contract proposal - Mounds View police Dear Mr. Pauley: The following are the contract proposals to be effective January 1, 1983: 1. Insurance: A. The 1!mploycr shall increase the limployer contribution for insurance by twenty dollars ($20.00) per month; B. Additionally, the Employer shall pay fifty percent (50%) of any new increase proposed by the insurance carrier; C. The Employees who do not elect family coverage shall be reimbursed the difference between the single and family coverage. 2. Clothing and Maintenance Allowance: A. This allowance shall be increased by twenty-five dollars ($25.00) per year; 11. Add 27.2 and 27.3 1'rom attached. 3. Injury on Duty waiting period to he dropped. 4. Vacation accrual shall be as follows: I - 5 years = 12 Jays/yr. = lday/month G - 9 years = 15 days/yr. = 1-1/4 day/month 10 - 15 years = 20 days/yr. = 1-2/3 day/month 16+ years = 25 days/yr. = 2.08 Jay/month United To Protect Mr. Donald F. Pauley Page Two August 13, 1982 5. Employees assigned to work on any holiday shall receive an additional one-half (1/2) time for each holiday worked. 6. Wages; A. Investigator premium shall be $100.00 per month; B. Corporal premium shall be $125.00 per month; C. Wage adjustment shall be eight percent (8%). The Union reserves the right to change and/or modify its demands during the course of negotiations. Any items not changed or modified shall remain in full force and effect. Sincerely, TEAMSTERS LOCAL NO. 320 Robert J. Weisenburger Business Agent RJW/azo opeiu-12 Encl. 11 I 26.6 The UNION may appei a Chief's decision to the full board as cone tuted in 26.5 by notifying the Chief in writing within ten (10) work days of receipt of the Chief's answer. A request for review of the decision shall state the specific issue upon which the appeal is based. ARTICLE JUNII CLOTHING ALLOWANCE AND MAINTENANCE 27.1 There shall be a two hundred and seventy-five dollar ($275.00) per calendar year Uniform (includes all uniform items specified in the Departmental Manual for Operations) and Maintenance Allowance for the calendar year 1981. There shall be a three hundred dollar ($300.00) per calendar year Uniform (includes all uniform items specified in the Departmental Manual for operations) and Maintenance Allowance for the calendar year 1982. This allowance will be paid within the first two weeks of January. 27.2 Any clothing or uniform lZaas speeified in the napartnenul "^^•^' for Operstfaas damaged in the line of duty shall be replaced or repaired by the Employer. Time pieces damaged in the line of duty may be replaced or repaired up to a maximum cost not to exceed fifty dollars (S50.00) per occurrence. Eyeglasses damaged in the line of duty may be replaced or repaired up to a maximum cost not to exceed seventy-five dollars ($75.00) per occurrence. MM Claims for damages must be identified with a specific on the job inci- dent and supported by a recommendation from the watch supervisor. Dam- ages caused by accidental incidents not related to police work or damages caused by the negligence of the employee are not included under this pro- vision. ARTICLE XXVIII SALARIES 28.1 Pay rates based on years in classification. The following rates are for police officers employed in the classifica- tion prior to July 1, 1979: Salary Rates - Monthly 1st Year 2nd Year Police Officer 1/1/81 711/ 1/1/82 Start 1251 1251 1364 After 6 months 1298 1347 1469 After 12 months 1347 1444 1679 After 24 months 1540 1636 1888 After 36 months 1924 1924 2098 The following rates are for police officers employed in the classifica- tion July 1, 1979, or after: Salary Rates - Monthly lst Year 2nd Year Police Officer 1/1/81 1/l/82 10/1/82 Start 1251 1364 1364 After 6 months 1298 1469 1469 After 12 months 1347 1573 1679 After 24 months 1540 1784 1888 After 36 months 1924 2098 2098 ITEM ORDINANCE NO. 310 CITY OF MOUNDS V1L•'W COUNTY 01' RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA AMENDING THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF MOUNDS VIEW BY AMENDING CHAPTER 40.02, ZONING, RULES AND DEFINITIONS, AND CHAPTER 40.06, ZONING, AREA AND BUILDING SIZE REGULATIONS The Council of the City of Mounds View does hereby ordain: SECTION I. Chapter 40.02, Subdivision B, DEFINITIONS, is hereby amended by adding the following new paragraph and renumbering and rearranging all paragraphs of Chapter 40.02, Subdivision B, into alphabetical order: (68) Manufactured Home. A manufactured home is one that is defined by Minnesota Statutes, 327. SECTION II. Chapter 40.O6. Area and Building Size Regulations shall be amended by adding the following: Subd. F Building Design Standards (1) The length of all residential structures shall not exceed three (3) times the width, excluding garage. (2) A permanent foundation of concrete, concrete block, or wood as approved by the State Building Code is required for all R-1 residential structures with frost footings of at least 42 inches. (3) All residential structures, including manufactured homes, must comply with the State Building Code for single family homes. (4) All manufactured homes shall have available for inspec- tion, manufacturer's instructions specifying how said home is to be situated on a permanent foundation. (5) Unless located in a designated mobile home park, all mobile homes or manufactured homes shall comply with the provisions of this Code, as amended from time to time. SECTION III. This ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after the date of its publication. Read by the Council of the City of Mounds View on the 13th day of September, 1982. ordinance No. 316 Page 2 it Read and passed by the Council of the City of Mounds View this v 27th day of September, 1982. ATTEST. (SEAL) Cle�Mministrator I PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA Regular Meeting t ' August 23, 1982 6•• ;,i Mounds View City Hall 2401 Hwy. 10, Mounds View, MN 55112 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- The Mounds View City Council was called to order by Mayor McCarty at 7:35 PM on August 23, 1982. MEMBERS PRESENT: Councilmembers Doty, Hodges, Forslund and Mayor McCarty. It was noted Councilmember Blanchard was absent. ALSO PRESENT: City Attorney Meyers, Clerk/ n strator Pauley and Public Works/Community Development Director Johnson. Motion/Second: Doty/Forslund to approve the ugusA t 9,1982 minutes as corrected. 4 ayes 0 nays Mayor McCarty stated that the Festival in the Park had been a very fun and yet a very humbling event, considering the Mounds View citizens who took the time and made the sacrifice so others could have the day to enjoy. Mayor McCarty read Resolution No. 1474, and thanked the Festivities Commission for a job well done. Motion/Second: McCarty/Hodges to adopt Resolu- tion N�74. 4 ayes 0 nays Mayor McCarty closed the regular meeting and opened the public hearing for the Silver Lake Woods assessments at 7:45 PM. Dale Cremers, of Kraus -Anderson, presented the Council with a proposed change to the schedule of assessments for the Silver Lake Woods project. He explained this change would allow higher assessments to be put on the condominiums, and thereby lower the assessments for the single family homes. Attorney Meyers stated he had discussed this pro- posed change with Mr. Cremers and Engineer Boxrud 1, Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Approval of Minutes: August 9, 1982 Motion Carried 4. Presentation of Rslt. No. 1474 Commending Mounds View Festivities Commission for the 1982 Festi- val in the Park Motion Carried 5. Public Hearing Proposed Assess meet Roll for Silver Lake Woo- fmprovement Project 1981-3 Mounds View City Council August 23, 1982 Regulax Meeting Page Two -------------------------------------------------------------------------- and his only concern was to insure that the amount of assessment on any lot must be reasonable. He also stated the total assessment figure for the project must net change. Attorney Meyers also pointed out that according to market analysts, it is believed that the condominiums will sell more quickly than the single family homes, which will result in the City receiving an earlier payoff. Councilmember Doty stated he felt this request was similar to what was proposed for SWM earlier, then changed. Attorney Meyers replied that this does not appear to be a problem. Clerk/Administrator Pauley corrected the interest rate to read "11V on the resolution. Engineer Boxrud stated he had gone over the final project costs, and he feels the figures are very close. Mayor McCarty closed the public hearing and opened the regular meeting at 7:55 PM. Motion/Second: McCarty/Forslund to send Resolution No 147 back to Staff for evaluation and recommendation. 4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Motion/Second: McCarty/Doty to have a special meeting on August 30, 1982 at 7 PM to deal with the Silver Lake Woods assessments. 4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Karen Weigand, 2273 Lois Drive, presented the b. Residents Council with a petition signed by 100% of the Requests and residents of Lois Drive, requesting an immediate Comments from and thorough investigation of the quality of the the Floor public water they are receiving. She presented the Council with two samples of water taken from her tap at different times. She added they are all concerned with the safety of drinking the water, as well as the discoloration of clothing and fixtures. Mayor McCarty explained the City is in the process of working on this problem, which started at the beginning of the summer, and an item further on the evening's agenda is to select a consultant to work on the project. Mounds View City Council August 23, 198: Regular Meeting Page Three -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Director Johnson explained the City has not con- ducted any tests during the past 20-30 days, other than standard tests on the drinking water, which was acceptable. Ile stated that Mounds View has been producing an extraordinarily high amount of water this past summer, which makes the water problem more noticeable and wide -spread. He added that they hope to have an answer within 30-60 days. Councilmember Forslund asked if Ms. Weigand would like the samples analyzed that she presented to the Council. Ms. Weigand replied that she would, and she also stated she would be glad to answer questions and provide additional samples to whoever works on the problem. Mayor McCarty asked if the City could agree that the tests run by the State are reliable for health standards. Director Johnson replied they could. He added that since it was a very busy time of the year, it might take longer than usual to have the samples analyzed. The Council discussed Item B and determined the 7. Approval of correct amoung of payment was $48,224.91. Consent Agenda Mayor McCarty asked that Item G be removed for discussion. Motion/Second: Hodges/Doty to approve the consent agenda, minus Item G, and waive the reading of the resolutions. 4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Mayor McCarty stated that there seemed to be some continui«g confusion over Item G, that while the salary was correct, he was opposed to changing the grade level and wanted it to be a Level XI. Moticn/Second: McCarty/Doty to amend Resolution No. 1481 to set the level of responsibility as a Level XI. 4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Motion/Second: McCarty/Doty to adopt Resolution go—. an7­waive the reading. 4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried This presentation was made earlier in the meeting, 8. Presentation of during, the residents requests and comments from Petition from the floor. Residents on Lois Drive Mounds View City Council August 23, 1982 Regular Meeting Page Four ' -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Park Director Anderson explained that this is 9. Consideraty a question of policy issue, and while he has of Rslt. t prepared a proposed resolution, it was open to 1483 Autho. change. the Hiring of Park -time Recr Mayor McCarty agreed that formal approval should tional Program come from the Council, and added he did have Supervisors questions and would like to discuss it further. Motion/Second: McCarty/Forslund to table Reso- Iutio�.� 83. 4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Park Director Anderson presented an update of where the Rec Activity Fund has been during the past five years. Park Director Anderson reported the Park and 10. Consideration Rec Commission had voted unanimously to request of Memorandum the Council approve sodding of the soccer field, Regarding Soddi rather than seeding. He updated the Council on Soccer Field at the problems they have had to date with seeding. Silver View Par Upon questioning from the Council, he informed them there is a quick coupler which can be hooked up to, to water the field, but that it is done manually, rather than automated. The Council discussed the issued and decided to wait until they had more information available. Councilmember Hodges mentioned he had been at City Hall the previous Sunday and found several people in the park who wanted to use the restrooms in City Hall. Park Director Anderson replied the Sattelite in the park had been mistakenly removed one week early, and would be put back in place. Park Director Anderson presented the Council with a summary of the joint puppet wagon program. There was discussion among the Council and Staff 11. Consideration regarding the process of authorizing a temporary of Request from occupancy permit. It was requested that Staff Standard Oil make a recommendation for setting a procedure. for Temporary Occupancy Permit Motion/Second: McCarty/Forslund to grant the J. R. and Staff Report Duoos Construction Company, representative of, and , Standard Oil Company, a temporary occupancy permit for the building at 2155 Highway 10. 4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Mounds View City Council August 23, 198;' Regular Meeting Page Five ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Motion/Second: McCarty/Forslund to authorize Toltz, 12. Consideration R ng, Duva and Anderson and Associates to con- of Consultant duct a study of a water treatment swXem for the Proposal for City of Mounds View, not to exceed $5,000, to be Water System funded by the Water Fund Retained Earnings Account. Study 4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Motion/Second: Forslund/Hodges to have the first 13. First Reading c• Ordinance No. Fe -Wing of Ordinance No. 315 vacating a portion of . Vacating a Por- Fairchild Avenue. tion of Fairchi 4 ayes 0 nays Avenue Motion Carried Clerk/Administrator Pauley read Ordinance No. 315. Councilmember Doty proposed an amendment to the Ordinance. Attorney Meyers explained that an is law, and should not have a recommenda- ordinance tion in it. Mayor McCarty added he felt the proposed amendment was covered already by the Charter. Councilmember Doty decided to withdraw his proposed amendment. Motion/Second: McCarty/Doty to accept the 14. Consideration c Resignation of resignation of Patricia Bailey and authorize the Tammy Turnacl.iff, at a salary of $3.50 Receitionist hiring of per hour, starting August 24, 1982, Recommendation for Hiring Rep) 4 ayes 0 nays aceraent Motion Carried Motion/Second: Hodges/Doty to approve the 15. Consideration c- Kpplication for pcyment o. ;137,08h.14 to Dawson Construction, Project 81-3. Payment No. 8 , Silver Lake Woods Improvement in the Amount c• $137,084.14 frc• 4 ayes 0 nays Dawson Constr. Lotion Carried Clerk/Administrator Pauley recommended that 16. Consideration c Staff meet with all the owners of the buildings Staff Report or in a joint meeting to advise them of the complaints Residents Com- and solicit their cooperation in resolving them, plaints on Hill view Road Apart The Council discussed the problems being exper- ment Buildings ienced, and the legalities of trying, to prosecute. Mounds View City Council August 23, 1982 Regular Meeting Age Six ' ------------------------------------------------------------- It was felt that the Police Department is doing a good job in handling the situation. It was the concensus of the Council that Staff should get together with the owners of the buildings. Attorney'Meyers reported the Miller deed has 17. Consideration been recorded, and discussed with the Council the Rslt. No. 1482 implication of what has happened. Regarding Land Motion/Second: Doty/Hodges to approve Resolution mentsion forRthei No1482 and waive the reading. Ramsey County 4 ayes 0 nays Reporting Depa: ment and Taxat: Attorney Meyers stated that Resolution No. 1482 Department Off: will hopefully prevent this problem from occuring Motion Carried again at the County offices. Director Johnson reported the street patching had been completed, He also reported the Wetlands 18. Report of Subcommittee would like to schedule a meeting. Director of Public Works/ Motion/Second: McCarty/Hodges to set a meeting Community Dvlp o t e et ands Subcommittee for August 26, 1982 ^� at 7 PM. 4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Director Johnson reported the final improvements for Silver Lake Woods were made last week, and anticipates the request for final approval will be submitted soon. Director Johnson reported he had received a notice from MnDOT that they will be letting bids on November 19, 1982 for the channelization of Long Lake Road to Highway 10. Director Johnson reported Staff is in the process of preparing a letter to Mr. Miller, informinc_ him the timeframe for his subdivision request has ex- pired. Per Council direction, Director Johnson stated they-w±11 bill Mr. Miller for the amount he owes the City, and will set up a procedure to moni- tor this closer in the future. Attorney Meyers had no report. 19. Report of Attorney Mounds View City Council August 23, 198: Regular Meeting Page Seven -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Councilmember Doty reported he had not personally 20. Reports of observed anything while driving by the Hillview Councilmembers Apartments. Councilmember forslund reported she had received some phone calls regarding clothes which had been discolored by the City water. It was the concensus of the Council that Staff could draw up a list of commercial products which could be recommended to residents who call in. Councilmember Hodges reported the Northwest Subur- ban Youth Service Bureau is asking each City for a resolution of: support, and presented a proposed resolution to the Council. Motion/Second: Hodges/Doty to approve Resolution Now—an�c waive the reading. 4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Mayor McCarty reported he had met with members from the Mounds View School Board and the coordinator for the Mounds View District #621 Senior Citizens for their weekly lunch at the Edgewood Community Center. Mayor McCarty reported he had received a brochure from a well known collection agency regarding collecting delinquent assessments and taxes. Attorney Meyers replied he would have to investi- gate further, but that Minnesota law does not allow the collection of these before they are due. The Council directed Staff to check into the delinquent taxes and see who the owners are. Mayor McCarty asked that Chairman Mountin of the Planning Commission be informed of the MAC meeting to be held at 7 PM on August 25. Motion/Second: McCarty/Doty to add as Item 17A disposition of the City contract with Short, Elliott, Hendrickson, engineering consultants. 4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Mayor McCarty explained the City is trying to lower its operating costs as much as possible, and how that they have a part-time in-house engineer, they would like to put consulting business out for bid, based on a recommendation from the City Engineer, if it could not he done in-house. He explained it was strictly a movement to cut cost, and in no way is a reflection on the past performance or value of Short, Elliott, Hendrickson to the City, Mounds View City Council August 23, 1982 Regular Meeting Page Eight --------- -------------------- ------------------ - ------- ------------------- Motion/Second: McCarty/Forslund to direct Staff to exercise the cancellation provision of the vendor contract with Short, Elliott, Hendrickson, other than current contracts or projects, 4 ayes . 0 nays Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported he had received a phone call from Mr. Povlitzki, informing him he is investigating selling part of his ownership, and asking what provisions the City has. Per Attorney Meyers, it would be handled the same way as any other applicant for a liquor license. Clerk/Administrator Pauley stated he would convey that to Mr, Povlitzki. Motion Carried 21. Report of Administrator Motion/Second: Forslund/Doty to adjourn the meeting 22 at M. 4 ayes 0 nays Respectfully submitted, Donald F. Pauley Clerk/Administrator Adjournment Motion Carried �I n 1 PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA Special Meeting i1 ; . ; August 30, 1982 ?;F^ Mounds View City Hall ' ka 2401 Hwy. 10, Mounds View City Hall -------------------------------------------------------------------- The Mounds View City Council was called 1. CALL TO ORDER to order at 7:10 p.m. on August 30, 1982 by Mayor McCarty. Members present: McCarty, Blanchard, Doty, 2. ROLL CALL Forslund, Hodges Other presents: Clerk -Administrator Pauley and Finance Director Brager. Clerk -Administrator Pauley presented a 3. RESOLUTION NO. 1476 letter from H. Richard Korsh, attorney for M & E Realty and Kraus -Anderson Development Company,indicating that the owners of the property be assessed in the Silver Lake Woods Improvement Project, accepted the assessment roll as presented, and waived their rights for appealing that assessment roll under the provisions of the City Charter and Chapter 26 of the Municipal Code. Motion/Second: Doty/Hodges to adopt Resolution No. 1476 adopting the assessment roll and waive the reading. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Councilmember Forslund advised the Council 4. AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER 40 that on August 1, 1982 the laws of the State of Minnesota relating to manufactured housing were changed to prohibit municipalities from preventing the placement of manufactured housing on single family zoned lots except with reasonable restrictions. The Council discussed what modifications they wished to have made to Chapter 40 of the Municipal Code and instructed staff to prepare an ordinance for their consideration at the September 7, 1982 Agenda Session. Motion/Second: Forslund/Doty to set a public hearing for 7:40 p.m. on September 13, 1982 on an ordinance to amend Chapter 40 of the .Municipal Code regarding manufactured homes and to have the first reading of such an ordinance. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Mounds View City Council Special Meeting -------------------------------------- Motion/Second: Forslund/Blanchard to adjourn at 7:23 p.m. 5 ayes 0 nays August 30, 1982 Page Two 4. ADJOURNMENT Motion Carried Respectfully submitted, Donald F. Pauley Clerk -Administrator