HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packets - 1982/10/11W
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
October 11, 1982
7:30 p.m.
A G E N D A
1. Call to Order
2, Roll Call - Forslund, Blanchard, Doty, Hodges, McCarty
3. Approval of Minutes: September 27, 1982 (Regular Meeting)
October 41 1982 (Special Meeting)
4. Public Hearing - 7:40 p.m. - Ordinance No. 318 Creating
Municipal Code Chapter 48,
"Wetland Zoning Ordinance"
5. Residents Requests and Comments from the Floor
------------------------------------------------
CITIZENS: BEFORE SPEAKING PLEASE GIVE YOUR
FULL NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE MINUTES
--------------------------------------
6. Approval of Consent Agenda
ITEM A. Approval of Release of $4,165.51 in Final Payment of
$52,390.42 to Allied Blacktop for Sealcoating Project 82-4
ITEM B. Approval of Staff Recommendation of October 4, 1982
Regarding Status of S.E.H. Projects and Authorize
Staff to Instruct S.E.H. to Continue or Close Out
Projects
ITEM C. Approve Resolution No. 1503 Amending Resolution
Numbers 1472 and 1497
ITEM D. Approve Resolution No. 1505 Approval of the
Completion of Development Agreement No. 80-39
for Arlin A. Wolf and the Release of the Contract
Bond in the Amount of $53,550
ITEM E. Set Bid Openinq on November 10, 1982 at 1:00 p.m. in
the Council Chambers for the Purchase of New or Used
One Ton Dump Truck
ITEM F. Licenses for Approval
ITEM G. Approve Resolution No. 1504 Approving Just and
Correct Claims Against City Funds
-continued-
AGENDA
October 11, 1982
Page Two
7. Approval of Second Reading of Ordinance No. 318 Amending
Lhe Municipal Code of the Cily of Mounds View by Creating
Chapter 48, "Wetland Zoning Ordinance"
8. Third quarter 1982 DeparLment (lead Reports
Finance Director Brager
Park, Recreation, 6 Forestry Director Anderson
Police Chief Grabowski
Public Works/Community Development Director Johnson
9. Approval of First Reading of Ordinance No. 321 Amending
the Municipal Code of the City of Mounds View by Creating
Chapter 49, "Flood Plain Zoning Ordinance"
10. Review of Letter to Past Due Utility and Tree Removal Accounts
11. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding Park Shelter
Buildings
12. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding Golden Gloves
Boxing Program
13. Consideration of Park, Recreation, and Forestry Director
Anderson's Request forTime Off With Pay to Attend the
1982 National Recreation and Park Association Congress
14
15
16
17
18
Report of Director of Public Works/Community Development
n) DLaLub ui Pieter Study (Info will be handed out at meeting.)
B) Report on County Road H Storm Sewer Repair (Info will be
handed out at meeting.)
Report of Attorney
Report of Councilmembers
Report of Administrator
Adjournment
4
�=lr11, 3
PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA
rn r+ a Regular Meeting
j September 27, 1982
:( 1, " , FE Mounds View City Hall
U IN A4 ° `"2401 Hwy. 10, Mounds View, MN 55112
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Mounds View City Council was called to order by 1. Call to Order
Mayor McCarty at 7:30 PM on September 27, 1982.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Councilmembers Hodges, Forslund, 2. Roll Call
MaEncFard, Doty and Mayor McCarty.
ALSO PRESENT: City Attorney Meyers, Clerk/
A in strator Pauley and Public Works/Community
Development Director Johnson.
Motion/Second: Doty/Forslund to approve the Septem- 3. Approval of
ber 13, 1962 minutes as presented. September 13,19
5 ayes 0 nays and September
20, 1982
Motion Carried
Motion/Second: Doty/Hodges to approve the September
. minutes as presented.
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
There were no residents requests or comments from 4. Residents
the floor. Requests and
Comments from
the Floor
It was noted that Item A should be September 30, 5. Approval of the
rather than September 27. Consent Agenda
Motion/Second: Fors lund/ Blanchard to approve the
consent agen a and waive the reading of the resolu-
tions.
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Director Johnson updated the Council on the condi-
i.on of the water a resident had brought in earlier
a the evening. He reported it definitely was very
Cloudy and dark; and appeared undrinkable He
stated he had spoken with the Public Works Foreman,
who explained that the valves had been closed on
Mounds View City Council September 27,-1982
Regular Meeting Page Two
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lois Drive that afternoon, in preparation for flushing
the next morning, which was contributing to the pro-
blem. He added that it would not be feasible to have
a crew come out this evening to work on the problem,
as they would just be undoing the work the crew had
done that afternoon.
Motion/Second: Forslund/Blanchard to approve and 6. Second Reading
a opt ordinance No. 316, Amending Municipal Code and Adoption of
Chapter 40 Regarding Manufacturered Homes, and Ord. No. 316
waive the reading. Amending Munici
Code Chapter 40
Councilmember Hodges - aye Regarding Manu-
Councilmember Forslund - aye factured Homes
Councilmember Blanchard - aye
Councilmember Doty - aye Motion Carried
Mayor McCarty - aye
Councilmember Forslund reported the Planning
third
7. First Reading of
Ordinance No. 31
Commission has recommended approval of the
draft of Chapter 48, with their Rcsolution No.
Establishing Cha
60-82.
pter 48 of the
Municipal Code
Motion/Second: McCarty/Hodges to have the first
Entitled "an
reading of Ordinance No. 318 creating Chapter 48,
Zoning
Wetlands Zoning Ordinance, and waive the reading.
5 ayes 0 nays
Motion Carried
It was noted that the ordinance would be available
at City Hall for review, and that it would be
discussed in detail at the second reading.
Motion/Second: McCarty/Hodges to set a public hear-
ing on Ordinance No. 31.8 on October 11, 1982 at 7:40
PI•i.
5 ayes 0 nays
Motion Carried
Mayor McCarty closed the regular meeting and opened 8A. Public Hearing the first public hearing at 7:44 PM. 1983 Revenue
Sharing Budget
Finance Director Brager reviewed the proposed 1983
revenue sharing budget.
There were no questions or comments from the
audience.
Mayor McCarty closed the public hearing and reopened
the regular meeting at 7:54 PM.
Mounds View City Council Regular Meeting September 27, 1982
Page Three
---------------------------------------------------------------
Motion Second: McCarty/Forslund to approve and 9. Consideration o
opt eso ution No. 1498 and waive the reading. the 1983 Revenu
5 ayes 0 nays Sharing Budget
Motion Carried
Mayor McCarty closed the regular meeting and opened 8B. Public Hearing
the public hearing at 7:55 PM. 1983 General
Finance Director Brager reviewed the proposed 1983 Fund Budget
general fund budget.
There were no comments from the audience.
Mayor McCarty closed the public hearing and reopened
the regular meeting at 8:07 PM.
Mayor McCarty thanked Staff for the tremendous job
they had done on the budget, He explained the Council
had decided to begin the process of building a reserve
for the general fund as a hedge against a loss of
revenue from the State in the future.
Motion/Second: McCarty/Doty to readjust the contin-
ency un 00-120-4910 down $7,994.
ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported that would change
the general fund 180, Maintenance Garage, to $55,086,
and the contingency to $24,000 and the fund general
balance to $22,994.
Motioion/Second: Hodges/Blanchard to approve Reso- 10. Consideration
utn No. 1499 and waive the reading, as amended, of the 1983 Gen
5 ayes 0 nays eral Fund Budge
Motion Carried
Motion/Second: Forslund/Blanchard to approve Reso- 11. Consideration o
ution No. 1500 and waive the reading. the 1983 Genera
5 ayes 0 nays and Forestry Fu:
Tax Levies
Motion Carried
Motion/Second: Doty/Forslund to approve Resolution 12. Consideration o'
'0 . aanrwaive the reading. the 1983 Bond ai
5 ayes 0 nays Interest Tax LeN
Motion Carried
Mounds View City Council September 27,'1982.
Regular Meeting Page Four
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Motion/Second: Doty/Blanchard to approve Resolution 13. Consideratto
No. 1495, denying the development request of Dynamic Rslt. No.'
Designers and waive the reading. Denying Degt
p
ment Request by
5 ayes 0 nays Dynamic Designe
Motion Carried
Motion/Second: McCarty/Doty to remove the item from 14. Consideration o
the tabs— Application for
Restaurant Lice,
5 ayes 0 nays and On -Sale
Liquor License
Transfer from
Richard and
Marlene Povlitz
dba Povlitzki's
on 10 to Donald
W. Baker, Josep
M. Ra4or, and
Patrick A. Conr
Jr./dba Gopher -
Shamrock, Inc.
Motion Ca;IW
Attorney Meyers asked if Donald W. Baker, Joseph M.
Baker and Patrick A. Conroy, Jr. were present. They
responded that they were.
Donald Baker stated they had no further information
to provide to the City.
Councilmember Doty asked if the City is required to
transfer liquor licenses upon request. Attorney
Meyers replied that a transfer does not present the
same situation as granting a license, but they
consider the potential transfer. He added this
would be handled the same as the transfer of any
license.
Motion: Doty to not consider the transfer of
the license at this time.
There were no second to the motion.
Mayor McCarty stated they had been through a
difficult time with this issue.
Motion/Second: McCarty/Doty to deny the application
or tense transfer from Richard and Marlene
Povlitzki to Donald W. Baker, Joseph M. Baker and
Patrick A. Conroy, Jr.
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Mounds View City Council September 27, 1982
Regular Meeting Page Five
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported the City had 15. Consideration o
>'eceived a petition for two streetlights on Pine- Pinewood Drive
ood between Quincy and 35W, and after meeting with Streetlight
NSP, it was determined the suggested locations would Petition
not work, and two alternatives were suggested by NSP,
Motion/Second: Forslund/Hodges to grand the request
or street fights on Pinewood Drive, between 2127 and
2119, and between 2085 and 2077.
5 ayes 0 nays
Motion Carried
Director Johnson brought to the Council's attention 16. Report of Dir-
that his contract with them expires on October 9, ector of Public
and presented them with an amendment, extending it Works/Community
to the end of the year. Development
Mayor McCarty stated they would like time to review
it in order to look at funding. Director Johnson
asked what he should do if he reaches 700 hours be-
fore the next meeting, The Cnuncil, assured him that
they would be renewing the contract.
Motion/Second: McCarty/Blanchard to continue the
aubje— ctof the Public Works/Community
ivelopment Director's contract until the next
.genda session on October 4, 1982.
5 ayes 0 nays
Motion/Second: McCarty/Hodges to set a special
meeting on October 4, 1982 to deal with the pro-
fessional services contract for the Director of
Public Works/Community Development.
5 ayes 0 nays
Director Johnson reported that Mr. Hangee had made
the statement that the quality of water he is
seeing presently is the worst it has even been since
he has worked for Mounds View.
Motion/Second: McCarty/Doty to authorize Staff to
mme ate y call a squad car and send bottled spring
water to the resident, and charge to the contingency
account.
5 ayes 0 nays
Council took a 15 minute break while Director Johnson
d Councilmember Doty purchased spring water and took
to the resident.
Finance Director Brager presented the Council with a
proposed resolution, levying a tax for delinquent
utility charges over a one year period.
Motion Carried
Motion Carried
Motion Carried
Mounds View City Council September 27,'1982,
Regular Meeting Page. Six
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In response to questioning, Finance Director Brager
stated there were delinquencies other than utilities
that were owed the City. 0
Motion/Second: McCarty/Hodges to receive Resolution
No. 1502 and table action on the resolution until
such time as each individual listed has received a
letter from the City, notifying them of the City's
intent to place this on the tax rolls. Additionally,
all delinquent fees or other money owed the City that
may be legally assessed to the tax rolls be compiled
for the Council to review at the next agenda session.
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Motion/Second: McCarty/Hodges that it be the policy
of the Council to direct Staff that residents and all
others that are indebted to the City be notified by
letter before delinquencies are attached to their
real estate taxes for payment.
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Motion/Second: Forslund/Blanchard to add Resolution
No. as an item for discussion at the special
meeting on October 4, 1982.
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Card
Director Johnson asked for approval of the Silver Lake
Woods reapportionment. Attorney Meyers explained that
it is an existing assessment, and is just being
divided up differently.
Motion/Second: McCarty/Blanchard to approve Resolu-
ti'o—n—slW7489, 1490 and 1491 and waive the reading.
5 ayes U nays Motion Carried
Director Johnson reported he had received a memo from
Mr. Rose, explaining how soil testing is done, which
he will send to the Wetlands Committee.
Director Johnson reported he had received a letter from
Evan Green at MnDOT regarding the City's participation
in a traffic signal, and he would like to come in and
address the Council at an agenda session, to explain
the course of action that is being taken by MnDOT.
Director Johnson also reported that Spring Lake Park
is settlign a public hearing on the signal.
Attorney Meyers reported he had received information 17, Report ogle
on the cable tv, and it appears the final documents Attorney
are being submitted to the Cities for action. He
added that under Chapter 10 of the Charter, they must
Mounds View City Council September 27,
Regular Meeting Page Seven
----------------------------------------------------------------------
take procedural steps before approving a franchise.
(00*1also stated that the City should address having
1efacility in the maintenance building.
ClerkdAdministrator Pauley reported he had had several
discussions with the people connected to the cable tv,
and in order to provide adequate public notice, the
newsletter could be sent out early. Clerk/Administrator
Pauley outlined the tentative schedule.
Motion/Second: McCarty/Doty to arrange to have the
October T, T982 regular Council meeting at the Edgewood
Community Resource Center, in the theater, for a public
hearing on cable television, at 7:30 PM, with the
regular Council meeting to follow the hearing, at the
same location.
5 ayes 0 nays
Motion/Second: Doty/Blanchard to direct Staff to
request that the maintenance building be included in
the hook-ups.
5 ayes 0 nays
Attorney Meyers reported he had sent a memo to the
ouncil regarding the Rochester Association case,
ith the Comprehensive Plan versus Zoning, and it
'-was held that the zoning regulations control use of
the property in the City.
Director Johnson reported he and Staff are as ready
as possible on the Wetlands Ordinance.
Councilmember Hodges had no report.
Councilmember Forslund reminded everyone to get out
and vote on the school bond issue on October 5.
Councilmember Blanchard had no report.
Councilmember Doty reported he had missed the Park
Board meeting the previous week.
Councilmember Doty stated he had had an article for
the newsletter edited, and in the future would expect
no editing would be done without the prior approval
of the writter.
Mayor McCarty reported they must begin the process of
.king the necessary amendments to Chapter 50, regard-
.g the Lakeside Park Commission. Clerk/Administrator
eauley replied that he would have Park Director Anderson
prepare a proposed amendment.
1982
Motion Carried
Motion Carried
18. Reports of
CounciiiPiumbers
Mounds View City Council
Regular Meeting
September 27, 1982
Page Eight
-------------------------------
Mayor McCarty reported he had spoken to the chairman
of the Festivities Commission, and they have requested
a joint meeting of the Council and Festivities Commission
on October 5 at 7:30 PM, to discuss Mounds View's 25th
anniversary.
Mayor McCarty reported that he had been requested to
have copies available to candidates for Council of the
budget which had just been adopted, He stated those
copies would be available at City Hall,
Mayor McCarty reported that Spring Lake Park has autho-
rized money to the Lakeside Park Commission to offer
as a reward for information to lead to the arrest and
conviction of the vandals who set fire to the shelter
building, and recommended Mounds View support it also.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported that Mr. Ernst
19. Report of
has accepted the City's offer to purchase three
Clerk/Administ:
buildings for $15,000.
for
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported problems had
been experienced with vandals at Lambert Park over
the weekend. Mayor McCarty recommended letters be
sent to residents who have been active in that area,
asking for their help.
Is
Motion/Second: McCarty/Blanchard that the Council
a opt cy that all acts of vandalism or theft
within the City, as supported by evidence within
their judgement, be arrests and not warnings.
5 ayes 0 nays
Motion Carried
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported the attorney
representing the 111iilers had given him a handuut fur
the Council. He stated he would place the item on
the agenda for the next agenda session.
Motion/Second: Blanchard/Doty to adjourn the 20. Adjournment
meeting at T50 PM.
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Respectfully submitted,
Donald F. Pauley
Clerk/Administrator
tffL., 3
PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA
Special Meeting
"1 October 4, 1982
Mounds View City Hall
'"' 2401 Hwy. 10, Mounds View City Hall
----------------- ------------------------------------------
The Mounds View City Council was called
to order at 7:07 p.m. on October 4, 1982
by Mayor McCarty.
Members present: Forslund, Blanchard,
Doty, Hodges, Mccarty
others present: Clerk/Administrator
Pauleyr for of Public Works/
community Development Johnson, and
Finance Director Brager.
The Council entered into a lengthy
discussion regarding Resolution No. 1502
Levying a Tax for Delinquent Utility Bill
and Tree Removal Charges Over a One
Year Period and the methods practiced
by the City in attempting to collect
delinquent utility bills before levying
them on the property taxes, as well as
other City charges, such as, administra-
tive charges and insufficient fund check
charges.
Motion/Second: McCarty/Doty todirect
staff to send a letter to crop=••-r
owners having delinquent utility bills
or tree removal charges advising them
that there was an error in the letter
dated September 29, 1982 and that it is
not the City Council's intent to levy
these charges on the property taxes
without alternatives for installment
payment or payment in full first being
offered.
5 ayes 0 nays
The Council directed staff to draft
a letter for their approval to go to
these property owners which would also
mention the availability for County
assistance where financial hardship
exists. Staff indicated that they
would submit a proposed policy to the
Council for their consideration regarding
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. ROLL CALL
3. RESOLUTION NO. 1502
LEVYING A TAX FOR
DELINQUENT UTILITY
BILL AND TREE REMOVAL
CHARGES OVER A ONE
YEAR PERIOD
Motion Carried
Mounds View City Council
Special Meeting
------------------------
the collection of past due utility bills,
administrative fees, tree removal charges,
and insufficient fund check charges.
Council reviewed a proposed amendment to
the contract with John Johnson for
professional services, increasing the
current contract by 360 hours or $8,100,
and a memorandum from the Finance Director
indicating possible funding sources for
this contract amendment.
Motion/Second: McCarty/Doty to amend
the contract with John Johnson for
professional services to include an
additional 360 hours to be funded
per the recommendations contained in
a memorandum from Finance Director -
Treasurer Brager dated September 30,
1982.
5 ayes 0 nays
Motion/Second: Fors lund/Blanchard to
adjourn at 7:50 p.m.
5 ayes 0 nays
October 4, 1982
Page Two
------------------- --
4. AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT
WITH JOHN JOHNSON
FOR PROFESSIONAL
SERVICES
5. ADJOURNMENT
Motion Carried
Respectfully submitted,
Donald F. Pauley
Clerk -Administrator
4
W-rciK-
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
r COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
PROPOSED MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT
CREATING CHAPTER 48, "WETLANDS ZONING ORDINANCE"
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Council of the City of
Mounds View will meet on Monday, October 11, 1982 at 7:40 p.m.
at City Hall, 2401 Highway 10, Mounds View, Minnesota 55112,
to consider an amendment to the Municipal Code of the City by
creating Chapter 48 entitled "Wetlands Zoning Ordinance".
Interested parties may obtain copies of the proposed
amendment for review or purchase at the office of the Clerk
Administrator, Mounds View City Hall,during normal office
hours. Anyone desiring to be heard with reference to this
matter may make oral or written presentation at this meeting.
Donald F. Pauley
Clerk -Administrator
(Bulletin: Sept. 30, 1982)
n
CONSENT AGENDA
October 11, 1982
The Consent Agenda is a technique designed to expedite handling of
routine and miscellaneous official business of the City Council.
The entire Agenda may be adopted by the Council in one motion. The
motion for adoption is non -debatable and must receive unanimous
approval. By request of any individual Councilmember, any item can
be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed upon the Regular Agenda
for debate.
ITEM A. Approval of Release of $4,165.51 in Final Payment of
$52,390.42 to Allied Blacktop for Sealcoating Project 82-4
ITEM B. Approval of Staff Recommendation of October 4, 1982
Regarding Status of S.E.II. Projects and Authorize Staff
to Instruct S.E.H. to Continue or Close Out Projects
ITEM C. Adopt Resolution No. 1503 - Amending Resolution Numbers
1472 and 1497
ITEM D. Adopt Resolution No. 1505 - Approval of the Completion ui
Development Agreement No. 80-39 for Arlin A. Wolf and
the Release of the Contract Bond in the Amount• of $53,550
ITEM E. Set Bid Opening on November 10, 1982 at 1:00 p.m. in the
Council Chambers for the Purchase of New or Used One Ton
Dump Truck
ITEM F. Licenses for Approval
General - Expire 6/3u/82
Builders & Remodelers, Inc. - New
Michael Campion Co. - New
C. s. Cook Builders, Inc. - New
Robert Dierkhising - New
Kraus -Anderson Building Co. - New
Wayne Roger Homes, Inc. - Renewal
ITEM G. Adopt Resolution No. 1504 - Approving Just and Correct
Claims Against City Funds
a,,,
MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Director of Public Works/Community Development
DATE: October 4, 1982
SUBJECT: FINAL PAYMENT 1982 SEALCOAT PROJECT
The City is in receipt of the requested items from Allied Blacktop
to move ahead with final payment processing on the Sealcoat Project.
The items requested in my letter to Allied Blacktop have been sub-
mitted including lean waivers, consent of surety to final payment,
Minnesota Department of Revenue Form IC134, statement on withholding
of income taxes on wages and U.S. Department of Labor payroll report
forms.
The series of streets that were sealcoated the first day of operation
under high humidity conditions have been visually inspected and no
apparent deterioration of the sealcoat work appears to have occurred.
It is recommended that this project be placed on the October 11, 1982
Agenda for approval of final payment. It is further suggested that if
the Council has any comment, that they inform myself prior to that
meeting so that any necessary corrective actions can be taken.
JCJ/bc
voudg
cif Of
V
11'C
11AMSF Y Cn11NI V. MINNESOTA
2401 III(IIWAY 10
MOUNns VIEW, MINN 55112
18430b6
september 1, 1902
Mr. E. J. Capistrant
Allied Blacktop Co.
10503 - 89th Avenue No.
Maple Grove, MN 55369
Dear Mr. Capistrant:
Enclosed please find a check in the amount of $48,224.91 for
work completed on Improvement Project 482-4, Seal Coating. You
will note that the check, is for an amount less than the total
contract price and less than the billing received from your
statement dated August 5, 1982. The City has retained $4,165.51
pending receipt of the following items:
1) A mechanic's lean waiver from yourself and any suppliers
for materials furnished as parL of the project.
2) A certification from the Minnesota Department of Revenue
indicating payment ol. appropria Lc La Y.es.
3)• Receipt of payroll records per requirements of Davis
Bacon Law.
4) A copy of consent from your surety for release of final
payment.
5) Pending inspection of the work that was done un July 21,
1982 to insure that materials did not suffer due to high
humidity encountered the day work started.
It is anticipated that final payment caHbe completed on or about
October 1st if the City is in receipt of the items stated above.
If you have any questions, please contact me.
sincerely,
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
)� 1� �q.f�t�..
ohn C. hnson, Director
Public Works/Community Development
JCJ/bc:Enc.
•
I 1
U
cc: Drop I Ind Don Brager
Kt, C
RESOLUTION NO. 1503
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
AMENDING RESOLUTION NUMBERS 1472 AND 1497
WHEREAS, Resolution No. 1472, adopted on August 9, 1982,
established salaries for election judges working on the State
Primary Election; and
WHEREAS, Resolution No. 1497, adopted on September 27,
1982, established salaries for election judges working on the
State General Election; and
WHEREAS, these resolutions erroneously indicated that the
salary for election judges would be $3.35 per hour, when the 1982
General Fund Budget established election judges salaries at $3.50
per hour.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City
of Mounds View that Resolution Numbers 1472 and 1497 are hereby
amended to establish salaries for election judges for the State
Primary Election and State General Election at $3.50 per hour
pursuant to the General Fund Budget of the City of Mounds View
for Fiscal Year 1982.
Adopted this llth day of October, 1982.
ATTEST:
mciyi,r
(SEAL)
C crk-Administrator
a
qtn, o
MEMO TO: Clerk -Administrator and City Council
FROM: Engineering/Planning Technician f,Jk.-
DATE: October 7, 1982
SUBJECT: RELEASE OF SECURITY AND FINAL APPROVAL OF
WOLF AND ASSOCIATES
Attached please find Resolution No. 1505 approving the release
of the Contract Bond for $53,550 and the final approval of the
wolf and Associates Industrial building located on Mustang
Circle. All requirements and conditions of Development Agree-
ment No. 80-39 have been completed, including the easement
agreement to water tower 12.
FJK/bc
RESOLUTION NO. 1505
�~ CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
APPROVAL OF THE COMPLETION OF DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
NO. 80-39 FOR ARLIN A. WOLF AND THE RELEASE OF
THE CONTRACT BOND IN THE AMOUNT OF $53,550
WHEREAS, Mr. Arlin A. Wolf was required by Development
Agreement No. 80-39 to post a security in the form of a contract
bond in the amount of $53,550; and
WHEREAS, this bond is required to insure that the develop-
ment occurs in conformance with the requirements as outlined in
Development Agreement No. 80-39; and
WHEREAS, all conditions and requirements pursuant to
Development Agreement No. 80-39 have been completed;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View City
Council approves the completion of the conditions and requirements
in Development Agreement No. 80-39 and authorizes the release of
Contract Bond in the amount of $53,550 and the issuance of a Final
Occupancy for the Wolf and Associates building located at 4860
Mustang Circle.
ATTEST:
(SEAL)
Adopted this llth day of October, 1982.
Mayor
Clerk -Administrator
1- (;
MEMO TO: The Mounds View City Council
f
FROM: Bruce K. Anderson, Direr
Parks, Recreation and s y
DATE: October E, 1982
RE: Bid opening for the purchase of a one ton dump truck
Staff would recommend that the City Council establish a bid opening date
for the possible purchase of a new one ton dump truck on Wednesday, November
10, 1982 at 1:30 p.m. In addition to recommending a bid opening, staff has
enclosed a letter that was forwarded to a number of contractors and related
agencies (see enclosed list) to solicit any input or possibilities of pur-
chasing a used dump truck similar to the enclosed specifications.
It would be staff's intent that we would review any proposals that are received
for used dump trucks as well as soliciting new bid proposals at the same time
with staff preparing a report outlining the pros and cons of both purchasing
a new or used vehicle. Should the Council have any contacts regarding used
vehicles or additional people that they feel we should be contacting, feel
free to give myself a call so that I might forward them the attached inform-
ation.
Should you have any questions regarding staff's direction on this issue, feel
free to give me a call at extension no. 41.
BKA/sl1
vounig
Ciof of
RAMSEY COUNTY. MINNESOTA
7401 IIIGIIWAY 10
MOuNos VIEW. MINN. 55112
7563055
111 1••1111411 NI "I I•AIII.:.•
III tIII AI IIIN AIJP I11111 :•I 115
October 8, 1982
Good Day:
This City of Mounds View is currently seeking contacts and/ur• proposals
for the purchase of a used one ton dump truck. The basic vehicle that
the city is considering purchase of would be a one ton truck with a
12 foot contractors box which would meet most of the criteria established
in the enclosed specification list, but the city is willing to consider
a variety of vehicles and/or proposals for a similar type of vehicle.
The vehicle will mainly be used in our parks depattment for hauling small
loads of material as well as emptying trash, etc. and will be used on a
regular basis so that gas mileage and dependability are of the utmost
in priority. Should you have a vehicle you feel meets the city's min-
imum criteria, feel free to contact myself at (612) 784-3055, extension
no. 41. The City Council will be considering the purchase of either
a used or new vehicle in mid -November and we would ask that you submit
your proposal or contact myself no later than 12:00 noon on Wednesday,
November 10. Should you have any questions at all regarding this issue
feel free to contact me at the aforementioned number to discuss any
phases of the specifications or possible purchase of a used vehicle.
/-Si ely.r_��/�
Bruce K. Ander3on'Director
Parks, Recreatio and Forestry
BKA/sll
Anthony Truck Equipment Anderson Dodge Inc. Jay Kline Chevrolet
1881 trice Street 1201 E. Lake 1221 W. Lake St.
St. Paul, Minnesota 55113 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55407 Minneapolis, Mn. 55408
?"-a Truck Bodies
r way 13 S.
,u�eca, Minnesota 56093
Bill Boyer Ford Trucks
2811 NE. Broadway
Minneapolis, Minnesota
larwood Twin Cities Truck Equip. Brookdale Pontiac-GMC-Honda
'301 University Avenue, S.E. 6801 Brooklyn Blvd.
linneapolis, Mn. 55414 Minneapolis, Mn. 55429
!loiby Body Co.
?010 Washington Ave. N.
linneapolis, Mn. 55411
<olstad Company Trans. Tech
507 Walnut
'c. Paul, Minnesota
.aHass Mfg. & Sales Inc.
Highway 13
'aul, Minn. 55122
-IacQueen Equipment Inc
i95 Aldine
it. Pual, Minn. 55104
4arion Body Works,Inc
'll West Ramsdell
,iarien, WiScogcin
:has. Olson and Sons and Wheel
Service Co., Inc.
i77 Transfer Rd.
A. Paul, Minn. 55114
,eabody Galion Dump Bodies
1370 English
oaul, Minnesota 55109
Midway Chevrolet Co.
1389 University Ave.
St. Paul, Minnesota 55104
Harold Chevrolet Inc.
1601 Southtown Dr.
Minneapolis, Mn. 55431
Iten Chevrolet
I-694 & Brooklyn Blvd.
Minneapolis, Mn. 55429
Grossman Chevrolet Co., Inc.
1200 W. 41st St.
Burnsville, Mn.
Viking Chevrolet, Inc.
7501 N. Highway 65
1'II IIIIrd PQl Is, Mu. 55432
Southview, Chevrolet Co.
Highway 110 & S. Robert St
Inver Grove Heights, Mn.
Merit Chevrolet Inc.
I94 and Century Ave.
Maplewood, Minnesota
Rosedale Chevrolet
2845 Highway 35W
Roseville, Mn. 55113
Wilkins Dodge Inc.
1013 University Ave.
St. Paul, Minnesota 55104
Golden Valley Dodge
6800 Wayzata Blvd.
Minneapolis, Mn. 55426
Osborn-Fasula Olds -Dodge
1904 Vermillion
Hastings, Minnesota
Trail Dodge, Inc.
S. Robert and Highway 110
Inver Grove Hgt., Minn.
Anderson Dodge Inc.
1201 E. Lake
Minneapolis, Mn. 55407
North Star Dodge Inc.
6800 Brooklyn Blvd.
Minneapolis, Mn. 55429
Rosemount Dodge Sales
14755 S. Robert Trail
Rosemount, Minnesota
White Bear Dodge
3430 N. Highway 61
White Bear Lake, Mn. 55110
"ruck Utilities and Mfg. Downtown Chevrolet Co. Brookdale Ford
1370 English 1301 Harn Pl. 2500 Country Rd. 10
,t. Paul, Mn, 55109 Minne,^ 'In. 55403 Minneapolis, Mn. 55430
Unh Carter Ford, Inc.
Highway 110 & S. Robert Trail
inver Grove Heights, Mn.
Crossroads Ford
7414 Hudson Blvd.
St. Paul, Mn.
Freeway Ford
9700 L'yndale Ave. S.
Minneapolis, Mn. 55420
Goebel Ford
3401 Coon Rapids Blvd.
Coon Rapids, Mn. 55433
Midway Ford Company
2777 Snelling Ave. N.
St. Paul, Minnesota 55113
Minar Ford, Inc.
Highway 694 & Silver Lk. Rd.
New Brighton, Mn. 55112
Ridgedale Ford
13400 Wayzata Blvd.
Minnetonka, Mn.
Icon Saxon Ford
225 University Ave.
St. Paul, Minnesota
Tousley Ford, Inc.
N. Highway 61 & E. Co
St. Paul, Minnesota
Town's Edge Ford
3555 S. Highway 100
Minneapolis, Mn. 55416
Minnesota Truck Center, Inc,
Rd. E 2845 Long Lake Rd,
New Brighton, Minnesota A112
1 Motor Co.
208108 University Ave,
St. Paul, Minnesota
GMC Truck & Coach Division
3001 N.E. Broadway
Minneapolis, Mn.
Grookdale Pontiac
6801 Brooklyn Blvd.
Minneapolis, Mn.
Peterson Pontiac GMC, Inc.
8801 Lyndale Ave. So.
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55420
Rudy Luther's Toyota-GMC
8801 Wayzata Blvd.
Minneapolis, Minnesota
Christy Pontiac - GMC Village
3880 Highway 61
White Bear Lake, Mo. 55110
Lawrence Motors
3154 N. Service Drive
Red Wing, Minnesota
Libson Truck Sales Inc.
2014 Washington Ave. N,
Minneaplis, Minnesota
Mack Trucks Inc.
2195 W. Co. Rd. C2
St. Paul, Minnesota 55113
Allstate Petervilt Utilit
558 E. Villaume Ave.
So. St. Paul, Minnesota
Ralph Thomas Polar Chev.
Highway 61 N. & Co. Rd. F
White Bear Lake, Mn. 55110
Novak Pontiac Buick GMC Trucks Rihm Motor Co.
620 No. Lake 2108 University Ave.
Forest Lake, Minnesota St. Paul, Minnesota
Shakopee Ford Schneider Pontiac Buick GMC
1400 1st Ave. E 12044 120 Ave. S.
Shakopee, Minn. 55379 Hastings, Minnesota
Southdale Ford Bob Olson Motor Co.
6969 France Ave. So. 13523 N. 50 St.
'4inneapolis, Mn. 55435 Stillwater, Minnesota
Twin Cities Used Truck Center
720 N.E. Hoover
Minneapolis, Minnesota
Volvo Diesel Trucks
Minnesota Truck Center, Inc,
2845 Long Lake Road
St. Paul, Minnesota As
0
r1
lUdSOLUTI011 li0. 1504
cr'rY or M0111,1Ie; Vnav
L'0UNTY Ilf RAIA';EY
:;'I'A'1'L ui- M11JW�WfA
APPROVING JU"r Alit) Cf RRE'Ifl'
GLATIV, AGATNST CTTY h�IIJU,
YJIII?IUtA^, l.he CiL,y Council of Monud:: Vice;, pm•suant to
has full authority over the financial affairs
of Lh• CiL,Y :nul;
Wlllaih:A,",, The l;iLy Council has reviewed the claims nwnbers:
_101142 tl'roijOi _10114 in u:c
nmonnk. of 25,910.24
17L roL 44,341.14
tl17 m
LhroulJh in Ll;e amrna:t of ;t,,
Lluoul;h in Lhc :mrow:L nl' --
TCii'AL fN11i1WI' 0R CLAIM" P111:01?N'ITO :I• ,70,25: 90_
:unl har fnuud ::aid ,fl::im: to ha ,Jac;L and cnrrcr.l,;
(list. of any execption)
NOl" 'fIII{IiIiF01i1;, he it resolved that Lhe City Council of Mounds View
hereby approved the attached lists of claims dated by the
vote ayes nayes
( SEAL)
Mayor
Clerk-Adinini strator
4T-Y-OF-HOUNDSVIEii-- -- A-C -6-0-U N T S P A Y-A -B L-E DATE 10-12-82--PAGE--i-• —, 16
GK.i;K° L M U U I. T C L A I C' P U P O E 111
___0.1T83 i
OL783a
01%BS�i
__1>11040
O111i41
a1'744[
—01?643
i,
�LI•.
L_r__017844
�i
L01134 5
• ,-.GiT845
� nl 01184T
0.17A4A
0It341
O1%e°.J
017 8'i t
15
225.10
CHIPi��L LA;:T. .
_LPPLIE:,L;'"ATI86
152.50
Uh 0—GUNSMPLM'It
PPLILStIPr•:91 W;
171.G0
GULUTH SUPEX10" t.aG;!r!_
-- —
PPLIE:tLPCR6TIN!.
MOO
iIGRTHJI�L CHRI_i;HA
E F U N D
31.00
RALPII HANGGI
SALARIES OEMP4PAFT TIME
100.00
;NORTH ELLIOTT Alai.
U HC7 PFGF:=.IOAAL SERV
89296.95
,mljRlH CLLiOii ANC
ALMIN, CHARGEL PAYABLE _—
AND -OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERV
76.61
CITY OF MOUNDS VIER
MISC OFFICE -SUPPLIES
ANO-SUPPLIES9UPEPAT ING
24b.93
PIWOLNUAL INS GO
G,'OUP INSURANCE._.__
AND -INSURANCE BONDS
500.00
U PGSTMAi,TER
POSTAGE
21i571.1;2
CrcSr .TA.;E RANk Of
SALAQIES. REGULAR
AND-SALARIEStTEHPIP-ART UHL_._
AND-OVERTIMEt REGULAR
7t48r,. m
GROUP KALI PLAN ING
GROUP.INSLRANCE
its': 4. Al
ST41E WAS - P E ✓. A
PENSIONS
112.22
STEVE GLYSING
PROGRAH INSTRUCTORS
118.92
GuUG ISAACSON
PROGRAM -INSTRUCTORS _ --
441141.74 NLCFSSARY EXPENUITURES SINCE LAST COOK IL MEETING
t
•
t`l � �� 0 I
1.
;�6IiY Of MOUL•P"VISE-A-G4,O-U-N-T - P A Y A P. L PAG(
� ,•,�i • chi ,.� G . ,E o u 3 H A r,
• 1, 010042 20.20 ALu1N:•Ja SUPPLIES,OPERATIN�
010043 9.36 At.LRIL;wN LIN(N SUPPLY CO CLEANING -TOWELS 4 RAGS
O1J644 25.9$ Ofa^.L :iNJERSOti SIiPPLIEStCPfRATING
8 •I ��'•
10045 87.15 AGuhZYME MIONEST SATELLITES
010046 179.BT AI:SE(rAl GRAVEL LO SUPPLIES,OPEkATIN,
010a47 45.51 d SOG INULPENU:HT OE:ALCR SUPPLILSt EOUIPM[NT — ly•
o 10-146 880.12 Auto MEDICS REPAIR�.t EQUIPNEN II"
--- v
PRINTINGG10U49 1,280.56 OOLGER PU£LICA'iION:
010050 14.22 CASE POWER ♦ [IUIFMENT SUPPLIES, ECUIPNEHT
v I4
•.."I O10051 1tU72.75 GLARt; LANDSCAPINGJi1E REMOVAL — la;
010052 107.77 COLUMDIA TRANSIT CORD RENTAL, ECUIPMf.NT N
1) _- IO
• 010053 $33,84 COPY E°UPLICAiTNG PPOG RENTAL, ECUIPMENi
---- -- , 7
al 010054 42.50 CRONSTPOMS REP., OLOGS • GROUNDS la
-0101155 299.23 DAUE.".. HATER EOUIPHENt <UPPLIE3, U`ILIIIF.S ---"
II :�
�; Ula!5o 40.00 Gi"IC;:AEOR ;PECIALTY CO REPAIPS, EQUIPMENT I
010057 677,17 HARKINS CHEMICAL INC SUPPLIEStOPF.RATING is
.r
tt 010058 16.50 MAYDEN-MURPHY SUPPL1E:,t EQUIPMENT �Ir
' U10059 1#372050 JOHN 0 JOhNSON OTHER PROFESSIONAL SEPV y
U10060 304.60 KOKESM ATHLETIC EGUIPMENT •
AND-:UPPLIES,OPERATING
• u U10061 19.50 METRO FONE COMM COMMUNICATIONS- TELEPHONE h;•
- GENERAL --LEGAL, SERVICES-'- —�n'
y O1U0u2 49480.00 RICHARO-H1:YERS---- ANC-PkO$ECUIING ATTY SERVICE `
IS
4 AND -OTHER PROFESSIONAL-SERV �A'
0 010Uri3 120.02 MINNESOTA TORO INC SUPPLIES, EOUIPNENi 9is
010664 33.94 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
R E F U IND �»
S ' 010005 764.05 N H BELL TELEPHONE CO COMMUNICATIONS -TELEPHONE _�-., ° •
0�
x
• , In
L
•
CITY IF HCU!...VIEW
Cll,-CK4 A 11 0 1) N T
O1U066 155.00
— OlUUb7 113,95
— 814068
010069
O10G70
--0 L0071
010072
010073
—0IOU? 4
010075
010076
—610U77
OlOn78
—010079
---oluuno
u i-;obi
olooaz
010083
-�10084
0100a5
010086
--0100a7
59,20
45,50
120.00
L44.14
19.57
55.29
15.4E
50.00
51, 50
275,00
117.46
66.00
739,58
1,C5d.Zb
45.60
84.UG
593. 60
3,U57.U4
155,46
A C C , U fI 1 P A Y A H L E u: T1. : a -:L r 1. I
C L A I M A N I P U R P U S L
NO LEXINGTON LANuSCAPING
DONALD F PAULEY
PLPSI COLA DU„LING CO
ROAD RUNNER PARCCL SER
PA ICLA S ROSE
_ + uFFICE PRODUCTa
HARY ;AARION
SPPING LAKE• PARK LLMuLP
LT PAUL 00OK4STAT-1ONERY
T f 5 TROPHIES
TERRYS LOCKSMITH
TWIN CITY TESTING
UNITOG RENTALS SYSTEM
WALTERS DISPOSAL SERVIfE
WATER PRODUCTS CO
CITY OF WHITE GEAR LAKE
AARON FAHRMANN
CYNTHIA R JOHN ON
ROBINSON COACH ING
SOLIOIFICATION INC
re::
GLSTCTNER CORPORATION
SUPPLIES, DLCGS#GRNOS
CONFEFENCES
ANO-MILEAGE
N E F U N u
GCNT. SVCS., DELIVERY
SALAPIES,TEMPtPAFT TIME
1115C-OFFICE JUPPLIE," -
11ILEAGE
SUPPLIES, 8LOGS*6PNOS
SUPPLIE.,OPERAT ING ------
SUPPLIES,GPERATING
REP., BLOCS *GROUNDS
OTHER PROFE55IONAL SEP.V——
UNIFORMS * CLOTHING
REFUSE COLLECTION
- SUPPLIESp UTILITIES -- —
SALARIES* REGULAR
AND -PENSIONS ---
AND-F,I.C.A.
ANO-GROUP INSURANCE
ANO-WORKERS-COMPENSATION---
PROGRAM INSTRUCTORS
PROGRAN INSTRUCTORS
SUPPLIEStOPERATING
REPA1fiS, LTILITIES
OTHER PROFEFSIONAL SURV
SUPPLIES*OPE.RATING --
AND-HIMEO SUPPLIES
1
Vic..
IF
I I r
JF H.ijI•' '_vll.'
i ( * „ !i f)
0 LOW
-!!10089
t
U Lao90
� U10091
010092
n
aLOG 43
;� 010094
k--C1O095
010096
I -
610097
T�0Ice 98
3Wt199
010100
010101
w
y 010102
atoto3
-910Y04
r
01-1105
k UL0106
— 010107
i�
a LIUIUB
h
01u1u9
�N `010111
I
n
U10111
i U10112
P d Y n L "A,(. 10-IZ-82 PAGE 4
T ! i P U N P O S E
133.UJ
i+',h COPP
;UPPLIE:90PEQATING
575.0U
^I OMINOUS CON -;LILTING
RL'PAIRS, VILITIE::
S
225.98
L + A PrOOUGTS OF !'INN
REPAIFS9 :QUIPMEST
.
15.00
CLARENCE SOWCP
GRANTS + SU25IDIE'>
37400
EL MARKETING
EUPPLMt CPERATING
12.00
MRS 9RUNO
R E F U N 0
7.00
OUNNIE JUPAN
PROGRAM IN;Ti.'UC1Cno
IU.50
GINGER POGAINN;
R E-F U-N !;
_--%'
Ja.Sa
NANCY !eQOU
R E F U N G
•
12.00
SUZANNE ZAHARA
R E F U N D
O
476.77
0FOR-0 CHEMICALS INC
--SUPPLIES-F-UTILITIES -=
JUSEPN !3,AKER
R E F U N 0
27. i0
VI LAKE.
R E F U N G
12. 0
JONATH.AN SCHUROFF _.__
._----R E--F-U-N- D
439.92
rRAN1 ENGINCEFING REPRO
RFPdI85i UTILITIES
�
MOO
STATE TREASURER
MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES
40iO9
RICHAN. ANDERS`ON -
--R-E F-U-N G
40.U0
5',P. UN COV,LTT
R E F U N 0
I'
S
40.00
AGOLPH GALLEGO
R E F U N 0
40.00
ARLANO GOETTSCH --
- R c'-t U N C
=•
f
6.06
WARREN HEROLD
R E F U N 0
40.00
TOM WIERING
R E F U N 0
--•
15.00
ANNA ERICKSON
R--E-FUN 0
84.00
K.EN LELM
PROGRAM INSTRUCTCrS
15.00
Hk THOEMKE
R E F U N
r�
u
;IIY OF 4GUIl. AIL., A C a v A Y A E t. t _I:,C 1U-12-11 PAC!
CHLCK" AN.OUN T GLA 1 t1 ANT PU°P0 SL
Ir.._O1U113 140,60 L' . GAPES INC ;UPPL1ESf �' n 'ING
I
016114 32050 MICHAEL SILVII+ "%F /,H Ir.sT•aCTU:"i '
I!'
7.1 259910.24 CHECK.i WRITTEN i
j�
TOTAL OF n8 CHECKS TOTAL 70125Is98 ^
a
i
I�
Y
a. 40
m
d
4
ORDINANCE•' NO. 321
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
AMENDING THE MUNICIPAI, CODE OF THE CITY OF
MOUNDS VIEW BY CREATING CHAPTER 49,
"FLOOD PLAIN ZONING ORDINANCE"
The Council of the City of Mounds View does hereby ordain:
(see attached amendment)
Read by the Council of the City of Mounds View on the day
of , 1982.
Read and passed by the Council of the City of Mounds View on this
day of 1982.
ATTEST:
Mayor
(SEAL)
Clerk -Administrator
APPROVED AS TO FORUM:
City Attorney
Draft 92 (1st Reading)
TO TV
CHAPTER 49
FLOOD PLAIN ZONING ORDINANCE
49.01 Statutory Authorization, Findings of Fact and Purpose.
Subdivision 1. Statutory Authorization. The Legislature
of the State of Minnesota has, in Minnesota Statutes Chapter 104
and Chapter 40, of the Mounds View Municipal Code, delegated the
responsibility to local governmental units to adopt requlations designed
to minimize flood losses. Therefore, the City Council of Mounds View,
Minnesota, does ordain as follows:
Subdivision 2. Findings of Fact.
(a) The flood hazard areas of Mounds View, Minnesota, are
subject to periodic inundation which results in potential
loss of life, loss of property, health and safety hazards,
disruption of commerce and governmental services,
extraordinary public expenditures for flood protection
and relief, and impairment of the tax base, all of which
adversely affect the public health, safety, and general
welfare.
(b) Methods Used to Analyze Flood Hazards. This Ordinance
is based upon a reasonable method of analyzing flood
hazards which is consistent with the standards established
by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources.
Subdivision 3. Statement of Purpose. It is the purpose of
this Ordinance to promote the public health, safety, and general
welfare and to minimize those losses described in Subdivision 2,
Section (a) by provisions contained herein.
fi
49.02
49,02 Ccneral Provisions.
Subdivision 1. Lands to Which Chapter Applies. This
Chapter shall apply to all lands within the jurisdiction of Mounds
View shown on the Flood Plain Zoning Map as being located within the
100-year flood boundary. These lands are delineated as flood insurance
zones A-1, A-2, A-3, A-4, A-G, A-7 or AH.
Subdivision 2. Establishment of Flood Plain Zoning Map.
Tile Flood Plain Zoning Map together with all materials attached
thereto is hereby adopted by reference and declared to be a part
of this ordinance. The attached material shall include the Flood
Insurance Study for the City of Mounds View prepared by the Federal
Insurance Administration dated and the Flood
Boundary and Floodway Maps and Flood Insurance Rate Maps therein. r~�
The Official Zoning Map shall be on file in the Office of the
Clerk -Administrator.
Subdivision 3. Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation. The
Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation shall be an elevation no
lower than one foot above the elevation of the regional flood.
Subdivision 4. Interpretation.
(a) In their interpretation and application, the provisions
of this Ordinance shall be held to be minimum require-
ments and shall be liberally construed in favor of the
governing body and shall not be deemed a limitation or
repeal of any other powers o•:anted by State Statutes.
(b) The boundaries of the zoning districts shall be
determined by scaling distances on the Flood Plain �)
0
49.02, 4, b
Zoning Map. Where interpretation is needed as to the
exact location of the boundaries of the district as
shown on the Flood Plain Zoning Map, as for example
where there appears to be a conflict between a mapped
boundary and actual field conditions, the Planning
Commission shall make the necessary interpretation
based on elevations on the regional (100-year) flood
profile and other available technical data. Persons
contesting the location of the district boundaries
shall be given a reasonable opportunity to present
their case to the Planning Commission and to submit
technical evidence.
Subdivision 5. Compliance. No structure or land shall
hereafter be used and no structure shall be located, extended,
converted, or structurally altered without full compliance with
the terms of this Chapter and other applicable regulations
which apply to uses within the jurisdiction of this Chapter.
Subdivision 6. Abrogation and Greater Restrictions. It
is not intended by this Chapter to repeal, abrogate, or impair any
existing easements, covenants, or deed restrictions. However,
where this Chapter imposes greater restrictions, the provisions
of this Chapter shall prevail. All other ordinances inconsistent
with this Chapter are hereby repealed to the extent of the
inconsistency only.
49.02
Subdivision 7. Warninq and Disclaimer of Liability. This
Chapter does not imply that areas outside the flood plain districts
or land uses permitted within such districts will be free from
flooding or flood damages. This Chapter shall not create liability
on the parr of MOUIId:; view or any officer or employee thereof for
any flood damages that result from reliance on this Chapter or any
administrative decision lawfully made thereunder.
Subdivision B. Severability. If any section, clause,
provision, or portion of this Chapter is adjudged unconstitutional
or invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder of
this Chapter shall not be affected thereby.
Subdivision 9. Definitions. Unless specifically defined
r�
below, words or phrases used in this Chapter shall be interpreted
so as to give them the same meaning as they have in common usage
and so as to give this Chapter its most reasonable application.
(a) Accessory Use or Structure - a use or structure on the
same lot with, and of a nature customarily incidental
and subordinate to, the principal use or structure.
(b) Equal Degree of Encroachment - a method of determining
the location of floodway boundaries so that flood
plain lands on both sides of a flooding source are
capable of conveying a proportionate share of flood
flows.
(c) Flood - a temporary increase in the flow or stage of
a lake or other flooding source that results in the inun-
dation of normally dry areas.
4
49.02, 9
C(d) Flood Frequency - tha average frequency, statistically
determined, for which it is expected that a specific
flood stage or discharge may be equalled or exceeded.
(e) Flood Plain - the areas which have been or hereafter
may be covered by the regional flood.
(f) Flood -Proofing - a combination of structural provisions,
changes, or adjustments to properties and structures
subject to flooding, primarily for the reduction or
elimination of flood damages.
(g) Flood Plain Zoning_District - the area delineated
A-1, A-2, A-3, A-4, A-6, A-7, or A-H on the Flood
Insurance Rate Map attached to the Flood Plain Zoning
Map.
(h) Obstruction - any dam, wall, wharf, embankment, levee,
dike, pile, abutment, projection, excavation, channel
modification, culvert, building, wire, fence, stockpile,
refuse, fill, structure, or matter in, along, across,
or projecting into any channel, watercourse, or regu-
latory flood plain which may impede, retard, or change
the direction of the flow of water, either in itself or
by catching or collecting debris carried by such water.
(i) Reach - a lenqth of a watercourse or water body having
relatively the same flood hazard.
49.02
(j) Regions Flood - a flood which is representative
of large floods known to have occurred generally in
Minnesota and reasonably characteristic of what can
be expected to occur on an average frequency in the
magnitude of the 100-year recurrence interval.
Regional flood is synonymous with the term "base
flood" used in the Flood Insurance Study.
(k) Structure - anything constructed or erected on the
ground or attached to the ground, including, but
not limited to, buildings, factories, sheds, detached
garages, cabins, mobile homes, and other similar items.
(1) Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation - an elevation
no lower than one foot above the elevation of the
regional flood except Judicial Ditch No. 1, Nillview
and Lois Drive flood areas shall have an elevation
no lower than 2.0 feet above regional flood plus any
increases in flood heights attributable to encroach-
ment on the flood plain. It is the elevation to
which uses regulated by this Chapter are required to
be elevated or flood proofed.
49.03 Establishment of Flood Plain Zoning Districts.
The flood plain areas within the jurisdiction of this Chapter are
hereby defined to be those areas delineated A-1 to A-4, A-6, A-7,
and A-I1 or Flood Insurance Rate Map attached to the Flood Plain
Zoning Map.
I
49.04
49.04 Flood Plain Zoning DistricL (F.Z.D.).
n
Subdivision 1. Permitted Uses. The following uses have a low
flood damage potential and do not obstruct flood flows. These uses
!;hall be permitted within the F.Z.D. to the extent that they are not
prohibited by any other ordinance and provided they do not require
structures, fill, or storage of materials or equipment. In addition,
no use shall adversely affect the capacity of the channels or flood -
ways or of any drainage ditch, or any other drainage facility or
system.
(a) Agricultural uses such as general farming, pasture,
grazing, outdoor plant nurseries, horticulture, truck
farming, forestry, sod farming, and wild crop harvesting.
(b) Industrial -Commercial uses such as loading area or park-
ing areas.
(c) Private and public recreational uses such as golf courses,
tennis courts, driving ranges, archery ranges, picnic
grounds, boat launching ramps, swimming areas, parks,
wildlife and nature preserves, game farms, fish hatcheries,
shooting preserves, target ranges, trap and skeet ranges,
hunting and fishing areas, and single or multiple purpose
recreational trails.
(d) Residential uses such as lawns, gardens, parking areas,
and play areas.
Subdivision 2. Conditional Uses. The following open space uses
require accessory structures (temporary or permanent), or fill or
storage of materials or equipment. These uses may be permitted in the
F.Z.D. only after the issuance of a Conditional Use Permit as provided
in Section 49.07, Subdivisio 4, of this Chapter.
I
49.04, 2
(a) Structures accessory to open space uses.
(b) Placement of fill. 0
(c) Extraction ut sand, gravel, and other materials.
(d) Marinas, boat rentals, docks, piers, wharves, and water
control structures.
(e) Railroads, streets, bridges, utility transmission lines,
and pipelines.
(f) Storage yards for equipment, machinery, or materials.
(g) Other uses similar in nature to uses described in Section
49.04, Subdivisions 1 and 2, which are consistent with
the provisions set out in Section 49.01, Subdivision 3
and Section 49.04 of this Ordinance.
Subdivision 3. Standards for F.Z.D. Conditional Uses.
(a) All Uses. No structure (temporary or permanent), fill
(including fill for roads and levees), deposit, obstruc-
Is
tion, storage of materials, or equipment, or other uses
may be allowed as a Conditional Use which, acting alone
or in combination with existing or reasonably anticipated
fut-are uses, increaser flood heights. In addition, all
F.Z.U. conditional uses shall be subject to the standards
contained in Section 49.07, Subdivision 4(e) and the
following standards (Section 49.04, Subdivision 3,b-e).
(b) Fill
(1) Any fill deposited in the F.Z.D. shall be no more
than the minimum amount necessary to conduct a
Conditional Use listed in Section 49.04, Subdivision
Generally, fill shall be limited to that needed to V
grade or landscape for that use and shall not in any
91
49.04, 3, b, 1
n way obstruct the flow of flood waters.
(2) Spoil from dredging or sand and gravel operations
shall not be deposited in the F.Z.D. unless it
can be done in accordance with (1) of this section.
(3) Fill shall be protected from erosion by vegetative
cover.
(c) Accessory Structures (temporary or permanent) permitted
as conditional uses by Section 49.04, Subdivision 2(a).
(1) Accessory structures shall not be designed for human
habitation.
(2) Accessory structures, if permitted, shall be constructed
and placed on the building site so as to offer the
minimum obstruction to the flow of flood waters.
(3) Accessory structures shall be flood -proofed in
accordance with the State Building Code.
(d) Storage of Materials and Equipment.
(1) The storage or processing of materials that are, in
time of flooding, flammable, explosive, or potentially
injurious to human, animal, or plant life is prohibited.
(2) Storage of other materials or equipment may be allowed
if readily removable from the area within the time
available after a flood warning.
' (e) Structural Works for Flood Control. Structural works for
! flood control such as dams and channel enlargements that
will change the course, current, or cross-section of a
public water shall be subject to provisions of Minnesota
Statutes, Chapter 105.
6
49.05
49.05 Subdivisions. No land shall be subdivided which is
held unsuitable by City Council for reason of flooding, inadequate '
drainage, water supply or sewage treatment facilities. All lots
within the flood plain zoning districts shall contain a building
site at or above the Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation. All
subdivisions shall have water and sewage disposal facilities that
comply with the provisions of this Ordinance and have road access
both to the subdivision and to the individual building sites no lower
than two (2) feet below the Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation
49.06 Public Utilities, Railroads, Roads, and Bridges.
Subdivision 1. Public Utilities. All public utilities and
facilities such as gas, electrical, sewer, and water supply systems
to be located in the F.Z.D. shall be flood -proofed in accordance with
the State Building Code or elevated to above the Regulatory Flood
Protection Elevation.
Subdivision 2. Public Transportation Facilities. Railroad
tracks, roads, and bridges to be located within the F.Z.D. shall
comply with Section 49.04, Subdivision 3 (a and b) of this Ordinance.
Elevation to the Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation shall be pro-
vided where failure or interruption of these transportation facilities
are essential to the orderly functioning of the area. Minor or auxil-
iary roads or railroads may be constructed at a lower elevation where
failure or interruption of transportation services would not endanger
the public health or safety.
F
l()
49.07
49.07 Administration.
Subdivision 1. Zoning Administrator. A Zoning Administrator
designated by the City Council shall administer and enforce this
Chapter. If he/she finds a violation of the provisions of this
Chapter he/she shall notify the person responsible for such violation,
indicating the nature of the violation, and ordering the action neces-
sary to correct it.
Subdivision 2. Use Permit.
(a) Use Permit Required.
A use permit issued by the Zoning
Administrator in conformity with the provisions of this
Chapter shall be secured prior to the erection, addition,
or alteration of any building, structure, or portion
thereof; prior to the use or change of use of a building,
structure, or land; prior to the change or extension of
a nonconforming use; and prior to the placement of fill
or excavation of materials within the F.Z.D.
(b) Application for Use Permit. Applica::ion for a use permit
shall be made in duplicate to the Zoning Administrator on
forms furnished by him/her and shall include the following
where applicable: plans in duplicate drawn to scale,
showing the nature, location, dimensions, and elevations
of the lot; existing or proposed structures, fill, or
storage of materials; and the location of the foregoing in
relation to the stream channel or water body.
(c) State and Federal Permits. Prior to granting a use hermit
or Variance, or processing and application for the Condi-
tional Use Permit, the Zoning Administrator shall determine
that the applicant has obtained all necessary State and
Federal permit
49.07, 2
(d) Certificate of 'Zoning Compliance for a New, Altered, or
Nonconforming Use. It shall be unlawful to use, occupy,
or permit the use of occuancy of any building or premises
or part thereof hereafter created, erected, changed, con-
verted, altered, or enlarged in its use or structure until
a Certificate of Zoning Compliance shall have been issued
by the Zoning Administrator stating that the use of the
building or land conforms to the requirements of this
Chapter. Where a nonconforming use or structure is
extended or substantially altered, the Certificate of Zon-
ing Compliance shall specifically state the manner in which
the nonconforming structure or use differs from the pro-
visions of this Ordinance.
(e) Construction and Use to be as Provided in Applications,
Plans, Permits, and Certificate of Zoning Compliance. Use
Permits, Conditional Use Permits, or Certificates of
Zoning Compliance issued on the basis of approved plans
and applications authorize only the use, arrangement, and
construction set forth in such approved plans and applica-
tions, and no other use, arrangement, or construction.
Any use, arrangement, or construction at variance with
that authorized shall be deemded violation of this Chapter,
and punishable as provided by Section 49.09 of this Chap-
ter. The applicant shall be required to submit certifi-
cation by a registered professional engineer, registered
architect, or registered land surveyor that the finished
fill and building elevations were accomplished in complile
fa
49.07, 2, e
with the provisions of this Chapter Flood -proofing
measures shall be certified by a registered professional
engineer or registered architect.
(f) Record of First Floor Elevation. The Zoning Administrator
shall maintain a record of the elevation of the first
floor (including basement) of all new structures or addi-
tions to existing structures in the flood plain districts.
He/She shall also maintain a record of the elevations to
which structures or additions to structures are flood -
proofed.
Subdivision 3. Board of Adjustment and Appeals. A Board of
Adjustment and Appeals is established as provided in Chapter 40 of
the municipal Code.
(a) Rules. The Board of Adjustment and Appeals shall adopt
rules for the conduct of business and may exercise all of
the powers conferred on such Boards by State law.
(b) Administrative Review. The Board shall hear and decide
appeals where it is alleged there is error in any order,
requirement, decision, or determination made by an
administrative official in the enforcement of administra-
tion of this Chapter.
(c) Variances. The Board may authorize upon appeal in specific
cases such variance from the terms of this Chapter as
will not be contrary to the public interest, where, owing
to special conditions, literal enforcement of the provisions
of the Chapter will result in unnecessary hardship so that
the spirit of the Chapter shall be observed and substan-
tial justice done. No Variance shall have the effect of
13
49.07, 3, c
allowing in any district uses prohibited in that distric
permit a lower degree of flood protection than the Regu-
].story Flood Protection Elevation for the particular area,
or permit standards lower than those required by State law.
(d) Bearings. Upon filing with the Board of Adjustment and
Appeals of an appeal from a decision of the Zoning Admini-
strator, or an application for a variance, the Board shall
fix a reasonable time for a hearing and give due notice
to the parties in interest. The Board shall submit by
mail to the Commissioner of Natural Resources a copy of
the application for proposed Variances sufficiently in
advance so that the Commissioner will receive at least ten
(10) days notice of the hearing.
(e) Decisions. The Board shall arrive at a decision on suet
appeal or variance within thirty (30) days after Public
Bearing of such appeal or variance. In passing upon an
appeal the Board may, so long as such action is in conform-
ity with the provisions of the Chapter, reverse or affirm,
wholly or in part, or modify the order, requirement,
decision or determination appealed from. It shall make
its decision in writing setting forth the findings of fact
and the reasons for its decisions. In granting a Variance
the Board may prescribe appropriate conditions and safe-
guards such as those specified in Section 49.07, Subdivision
4(g), which are in conformity with the purposes of this
Chapter. Violations of such conditions and safeguards
when made a part of the terms under which the Variance i�
4
49.07, 3, e
granted, shall be deemed a violation of this Chapter
punishable under Section 49.09. A copy of all decisions
granting Variances shall be forwarded by mail to the Com-
missioner of Natural Resources within ten (10) days of
such action.
(f) Appeal to the City Council and District Court. Appeals
from any decision of the Board may be taken by an person
or persons, jointly or severally, aggrieved by any decision
of the Board, or any taxpayer, officer, department, board,
or bureau of the municipality, to the City Council. The
decision of the City Council may be appealed to the district
court, of this jurisdiction as provided in Minnesota Stat-
utes 462.361.
Subdivision 4. Conditional Uses. The City Council shall hear
and decide applications for conditional uses permissable under this
Chapter. Applications shall be filed with the Clerk -Administrator
who shall forward the application to the Planning Commission for con-
sideration. The Planning Commission shall in turn refer application to
the City Council for decision as provided in the Municipal Code.
(a) Hearings. Upon referring to the City Council an applica-
tion for a Conditional Use Permit, the City Council shall
submit by mail to the Commissioner of Natural Resources a
copy of the application for proposed Conditional Uses
sufficiently in advance so that the Commissioner will
receive at least ten (10) days notice of the hearing.
rs
49.07, 4
(b) Decisions.
The Planning Commission
shall consider the
request at
its next regular meeting
unless the filing
'
date falls within fifteen (15) days of said meeting, in
which case the request would be placed on the agenda
and considered at the regular meeting following the next
regular meeting. The City Clerk shall refer said applica-
tion along with all related information to the City
Planning Commission at least ten (10) days prior to the
regular meeting. The City Council shall then arrive at
a decision on a conditional use within sixty (60) days
after the first regular Planning Commission meeting at
which the request was considered. In granting a Conditional
Use Permit the City Council may prescribe appropriate con-
ditions and safeguards, in addition to those specified i
Section 49.07, Subdivision 4(g), which are in conformity
with the purposes of this Chapter. Violations of such
conditions and safeguards, when made a part of the terms
under which the Conditional Use Permit is granted, shall
be deemed a violation of this Chapter punishable under
Section 49.09. A copy of all decisions granting Conditional
Use Permits shall be forvarded my mail to the Commissioners
of Natural Resources within ten (10) days of such action.
(c) Procedures for Evaluating Proposed Conditional Uses within
the General Flood Plain District:
(1) Upon receipt of an application for a Conditional
Use Permit for a use within the F.Z.D., the appli-
cant shall be required to furnish such of the follow
/to
49.07, 4, c, 1
ring information as is deemed necessary by the
Planning Commission for the determination of
the Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation.
(a) Plan (surface view) showing elevations or
contours of the ground; pertinent structure,
fill, or storage elevations; size, location,
and spatial arrangement of all proposed and
existing structures on the site; location and
elevations of streets; photographs showing
existing land uses and vegetation upstream and
downstream; and soil type.
(2) One copy of the above information shall be trans-
mitted to a designated engineer or other expert
person or agency for technical assistance in deter-
mining the Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation.
Procedures consistent with Minnesota Regulations
NR 86-87 shall be followed in this expert evaluation.
The designated engineer or expert shall calculate the
water surface profile of the regional flood.
(3) Based upon the technical evaluation of the designated
engineer or expert, the Planning Commission shall
determine the Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation
at the site.
�7
49,07, 9
(d) Procedures to be followed by the Planning Commission anc 1
City Council in passing on Conditional Use Permit applica-
tions:
(1) Require the applicant to furnish such of the follo-
ing information and additional information as
deemded necessary by the Planning Commission and
City Council for determining the suitability of the
particular site for the proposed use:
(a) Plans in triplicate drawn to scale showing
the nature, location, dimensions, and elevation
of the lot, existing or proposed structures,
fill, storage of materials, flood -proofing
measures, and the relationship of the above
to the location of the stream channel.
(b) Specifications for building construction and
materials,flood-proofing, filling, dredging,
grading, channel improvement, storage of
materials, water supply and sanitary facilities.
11
/i
49.07, 4, d
(2) Transmit one copy of the information described in
subsection (1) to a designated engineer or other
expert person or agency for technical assistance, where
necessary, in evaluating the proposed project in re-
lation to flood heights and velocities, the serious-
ness of flood damage to the use, the adequacy of the
plans for protection, and other technical matters.
(3) Based upon the technical evaluation of the designated
engineer or expert, the Planning Commission shall
determine the specific flood hazard at the site and
evaluate the suitability of the proposed use in rela-
tion to the flood hazard.
(e) Factors Upon Which the Decision of the City Council Shall
be Based. In passing upon Conditional Use applications,
the City Council shall consider all relevant factors
specified in other sections of this Chapter, and
(1) The danger to life and property due to increased flood
heights or velocities caused by encroachments.
(2) The danger that materials may be swept onto other lands
or downstream to the injury of others.
(3) The proposed water supply and sanitation systems and
the ability of these systems to prevent disease,
contamination, and unsanitary conditions.
(4) The susceptibility of the proposed facility and its
contents to flood damage and the effect of such damage
on the individual owner.
49.07, 4, e'
(5) The importance of the services provided by the
proposed facility to the community.
(6) The requirements of the facility for a waterfront
location.
(7) The availability of alternative locations not subject
to flooding for the proposed use.
(8) The compatibility of the proposed use with existing
development and development anticipated in the fore-
seeable future.
(9) The relationship of the proposed use to the compre-
hensive plan and flood plain management program for
the area.
(10) The safety of access to the property in times of
flood for ordinary and emergency vehicles. 11
(11) The expected heights, velocity, duration, rate of
rise, and sediment transport of the flood waters
expected at the site.
(12) Such other factors which are relevant to the purposes
of this Chapter.
(f) Time for Acting on Application. The City Council shall
act on an application in the manner described above within
the time limits given above, except where additional infor-
mation is required pursuant to Section 49.07, Subdivision 4
(c and d) of this Ordinance. The City Council shall render
a written decision within fifteen (15) days from the
receipt of such additional information beyond the time
limits given above. 0
aD
49.07, 4
(g) Conditions Attached to Conditional Use Permit. Upon
!" consideration of the factors listed above and the pur-
pose of this Chapter, the City Council may attach such
conditions to the granting of Conditional Use Permits as
it deems necessary to fulfill the purposes of this Chapter.
Such conditions may include, but are not limited to, the
following:
(1) Modification of waste disposal and water supply
facilities.
(2) Limitations on period of use, occupancy, and operation.
(3) Imposition of operational controls, sureties, and
deed restrictions.
(4) Requirements for construction of channel modifications,
dikes, levees, and other protective measures.
(5) Flood -proofing measures, in accordance with the State
Building Code. The applicant shall submit a plan or
document certified by a registered professional engineer
or architect that the flood -proofing measures are con-
sistent with the Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation
and asFociated flood factors for the particular area.
49.08 NONCONFORMING USES.
Subdivision 1. A structure or the use of a structure or prem-
ises which was lawful before the passage or amendment of this Chapter
but which is not in conformity with the provisions of this Chapter
may be continued subject to the following conditions:
(a) No such use shall be expanded, changed, enlarged, or
altered in a wav which increases its nonconformity.
(b) No structural alteration or addition to any nonconforming
ai
49.08, 1, b'
structure over the life of the structure shall exceed
fifty (50) percent of its assessed value at the time of 10
its becoming a nonconforming use, unless the entire struc-
ture is permanently changed to a conforming use or unless
the alteration or addition would substantially reduce poten-
tial flood damages for the entire structure.
(c) Any alteration or addition to a nonconforming use which
would result in substantially increasing the flood damage
potential of that use shall be flood -proofed in accordance
with the State Building Code.
(d) If any nonconforming use is discontinued for twelve (12)
consecutive months, any future use of the building premises
shall conform to this Chapter. The assessor shall notify
the Zoning Administrator in writing of instances on nonIS
forming uses which have been discontinued for a period
twelve (12) months.
(e) If any nonconforming use is destroyed by any means, includ-
ing floods, to an extent of fifty (50) percent or more of
its assessed value, it shall not be reconstructed except in
conformity with the provisions of this Chapter.
(f) Uses or adjuncts thereof which are or become nuisances
shall not be entitled to continue as nonconforming uses.
(g) Nonconforming uses located in the F.Z.D. shall be eliminated
or brought into conformity with the standards contained in
this Chapter within a reasonable period of time as determined
by the City Council, after a hearing for each such noncon-
forming use. The City Council shall make its determinat4
upon the basis of the normal useful life of any improvement
as
49.08 , 1, g
upon the premises. In addition, the monetary value of
r� any competitive advantage derived by the operation of such
nonconforming use, by ruason of the limitation on establish-
ment of competing businesses as a result of this Chapter,
shall be considered as a reduction of losses resulting from
the requirement of termination of the use under this
Chapter.
(h) The Zoning Administrator shall prepare a list of those
nonconforming uses which have been flood -proofed or other-
wise adequately protected in conformity with Section 49.07,
Subdivision 4(g) of this Ordinance. He shall present such
list to the City Council which may issue a certificate to
the owner stating that such uses as a result of these cor-
rective measures, are in conformity with the provisions of
this Chapter.
49.09 PENALTIES FOR VIOLATION.
Violation of the provisions of this Chapter or failure to
comply with any of its requirements (including violations of conditions
and safeguards established in connection with grants of Variances or
Conditional Uses) shall constitute a misdemeanor. Any person who
violates this Chapter or fails to comply with any of its require-
ments shall upon conviction thereof be tined not more that $500 or
imprisoned for not more than ninety (90) days, or both, and in addi-
tion shall pay all costs and expenses involved in the case. Each day
such violation continues shall be considered a separate offense.
Nothing herein contained shall prevent the City Council from
taking such other lawful action as is necessary to prevent or remedy
any violation.
,�-3
49.10
49.1.0 AMI,NDMRNTS.
'fhc flood Plain designation on the Flood Plain Zoning Map sha.�
not be removed from flood plain areas unless it can be shown that the
designation is in error or that the area has been filled to or above
the elevation of the regional flood and is contiguous to lands outside
the flood plain. Special exceptions to this rule may be permitted by
the Commissioner of Natural Resources if he determines that, through
other measures, lands are adequately protected for the intended use.
All amendments to this Chapter including amendments to the Flood
Plain Zoning Map must be submitted to and approved by the Commissioner
of Natural Resources prior to adoption. Changes in the Flood Plain
Zoning Map also require prior approval by the Federal Insurance Admini-
stration.
C
J
2 `-i
MQVIM VE �QI.
RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNE SOTA
GAP7TOk
THE NORTH 2401 14IGHWAY 10
MOUNDS VIEW, MINN. 55112
784.0055
Dear
It has been brought to our attention that the letter you received
from the City of Mounds View, dated September 29, 1982, regarding
your past due account with the City erroneously stated that the
City Council would be considering the levying of your past due
account on your property taxes at their October 4, 1982 meeting.
Rather, staff was advised that it was not the Council's intent to
levy a tax on your property without first exhausting every other
possible alternative to achieve the payment of your bill.
The alternatives would include, besides payment in full of the
outstanding bill, the establishment of an installment payment
agreement whereby you would make regular payments on your account,
or if financial hardship exists you may wish to seek assistance
through the Ramsey County Community human Services Department.
We apologize for any hardship our earlier communication might
have caused you and would encourage you to contact this office
at your earliest convenience to make arrangements on your account.
Sincerely,
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
Donald Brager
Finance Director
DB/pf
C
MEMO TO: Mounds View City Council
FROM: Bruce K. Anderson, Director
Parks, Recreation and Forestry
DATE: October 6, 1982
RE: Park shelter buildings
Enclosed is a variety of materials outlining current status of our park shelter
buildings that we have purchased from Ernst Movers. Specific action that staff
is requesting from the City Council is to approve the enclosed purchase agreement
from Ernst Constractors for the purchase of three park shelter buildings at
total cost of $15,000 and secondly to approve the two proposals from Stenco
Construction Company for the installation of frost footings and miscellaneous
repairs that may be needed done to the buildings.
At this time, the city costs that we are aware of for the building do not
appear that they will exceed $24,000 as our projected costs are as follows:
1. Purchase of the three buildings . ... . . $15,000.00
2. Installation of frost footings . .... . . 4,900.00
3. Estimate of 100 man hours to complete
miscellaneous repairs .... . . ... . . 1,850.00
4. Miscellaneous materials and supplies .. . . 500.00
5. Electrical @ $500/building .. . ..... . 1,500.00
Total ... . . ... .. $23,750.00
As can be noted in my attached staff memo to the Public Works Department, we
are planning to place the buildings at Woodcrest and Groveland Parks on permanent
foundations as per the Park and Recreation Commission recommendation on September
23, 1982 and place the building at Hillview Park on temporary footings or blocks
until the major park renovation can be completed which will allow the building to
be placed according to the master plan.
Our present timeline is to commence construction of footings immediately and
the buildings will be placed shortly there after with a completed deadline
of November 15, 1982. Should you have any questions regarding the buildings
or staff's direction to date, feel free to contact myself directly at extension
41.
BKA/slI
MEMO TO: Mr. Steve Rose, Building Inspector
Mr. John Johnson, Director of Community Dev./Public Works
Mr. Gary Kardell, Superintendent of Public Works
FROM: Bruce K. Anderson, Director
Parks, Recreation and Forestry
DATE: October 5, 1982
RE: Park Shelter Buildings
Attached is a letter that staff forwarded to Mr. Kenneth Ernst regarding
the purchase of three park shelter buildings to be located at Hillview,
Groveland and Woodcrest Parks. As can be noted, staff has negotiated a
contract price of $5,000 per unit which allows us to expend an additional
$9,000 for modifications to the buildings. Staff has received a proposal
from Stenco Construction to contruct frost footings with 2 - 3 courses of
block above the ground at a cost of $4,900 or approximately $1,650 per
shelter building. The buildings are currently enclosed and are ready to
be moved as soon as the footings have been completed.
At this time, staff is meeting with Mr. Jerry Stenhoff of Stenco Construction
at 9:00 a.m. on Wednesday, October 6, to lay out the final locations of the
buildings and to commence the frost footing construction as soon as possible.
As part of the bid proposal from Stenco Construction, he has requested the
use of -the city's backhoe to dig the initial 42" trench and he will stake
out the building and supervise trench work digging. As I understood our
conversation earlier this afternoon, the building department has requested
that we file building permits for the construction of these three buildings
which I will inform Mr. Stenhoff to do.
The remaining monies of approximately $4,100 will be used for electrical
hook-up as well as interior skate tile and window modifications. We do not
envision at this time sheetrocking the interior of the buildings but going
with the existing panelling as it appears our monies will not be enough to
do such.
Having reviewed the existing three park sites to determine the final location,
staff at this time would be proposing that the buildings at Woodcrest and
Groveland Park be placed on permanent footings with the building at Hillview.
be placed on a temporary or b! ^k footing hich will be sheathed with plywood
on a temporary basis. Th^ , tale for this temporary site at Hillview is
-2-
because the proposed location on the master plan would cause for major
renovation of the park of which we have no money at this time. Once again
the process staff envisions following on this is to commence the frost foot- '
ings as soon as possible once the building permits are approved and attempting
to relocate the buildings in the next two weeks. Our deadline for having these
buildings up and operational will be December 1, 1982 which gives us approximately
seven weeks to complete the project.
Should you have any questions regarding staff's position or direction on this
issue, feel free to give me a call at extension 41 so that we might proceed
with this project in as efficient and expedient manner as possible.
8KA/sll
Attachment
6
a
NI PAIIIMI NI III PAIIA':,
1111:111 AI II.N AND I II III 5I IIN'
September 2, 1902
Mr. Ken Ernst, President
Ernst Movers
9400 - 85th Avenue, No.
Minneapolis, 11n. 55445
Dear Mr. Ernst:
Cif of VOR s iew
RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA
2401 III GIIWAY 10
MOUNDS VIEW, MINN. 55112
70&3055
This is just a short note to follow up on our meeting on Tuesday, August 31
regarding the feasibility of purchasing one or more of the temporary classroom
buildings in Elk River. As per our discussion on Tuesday, the City of Mounds
View is interested in exploring the possibility of using the classroom buildings
as winter warming houses/park shelter buildings.
Our current need would be for four of the buildings which would be placed in
separate locations within the city's park system. As we discussed, access to
each of the four parks would be extremely easy and we would be willing to have
the site prepared, i.e, frost footings and three rows of block ready for the
building to be placed upon. The main question that we would like to raise at
this time is should the city desire to purchase four of the classroom buildings,
what specific price break would your firm be willing to extend to the city. Two
thoughts that come to my mind would be:
1. Would yourfirm be willing to stick to the for sale price
ranging from $5,200 - $5,600 and also include in that
price finishing off the four sides with the cedar siding
should we decide to purchase four buildings.
2. Would you be willing to accept a flat price of say
$20,000 for four buildings?
Mr. Ken Ernst
September 2, 1902
Page two
As the City Council will be addressing this issue in the very near future, I
would appreciate your response to these questions and any other input or throughts
that you might have regarding the sale of the classroom buildings.
Should you have any questions regarding this letter or the city's position, feel
free to contact myself directly at 104-3055, extension no. 41.
Si rely,
c�
dFd�c.. nd is , Dtrec'ot�i
Parks, Recreation nd Forestry
DKA/sll
cc: Mayor Duan McCarty
Councilme ber Dill Doty
Wayne 0utvteister, Parks and Rec. Comm. Chairperson
Don Pauley, Clerk/Adninistrator
I'UIN 11AaC AGREEP1iENT
Thia agu-nrllenl is made this J.r;.t... clay of .....OctoberOctober ................. 19...62.., by and between Ernst,.,,,.
hi nery......11nu;;.ama�er4._�.er. v!*r' 1"n . L•a.•in: her cr,lled the MOVER, and ,the City„nf Nwundsvietit
...................................
t, ..................................... horoinaller cnllcd the BUYER.
In consideration of mutual covenants and promises hereinafter contained, the MOVER contracts to sell the
htlildingsdescribed as follows: 3 214 x 32 portabin classrooms
•. • ....now lo,xdcd ul..4n. coin EInm.Srhool in Elk River,121. to move
h,tnrl Ika0mdduu„ to IL'u propclly Illnl is legally described an follows:
......................YBzlollS...latic>k..si,tes...in...3he.. �i.Gx..af .h>q!>ndsyi.@Wr...tllnnespt.a
Flftepn 7hotrsnnd Dnllnr.9., K t .:::....::.!:one prirn Is ...........: ..................... ........ la..�...,QCI!).0(........) and the BUYER agrees to 14y in the
in!lnv: out ❑;.:unu::
a ................................ utx;n execution of this contract.
$......I......................... on or bolore Ilia atruclura has been placed over the excavation on the now location.
when Ilia .................................. has been lowered onto his foundation walls.
$•.1.5,i)!:(.1.70...... an the following terns upon recehht I the three bldps, and billing statement
Tim 3IU1'I•;II ugnes to rnnournrc urrk iyel3o citsredit-lirabile, anti toa.omIticte the moving within a reasonable time.
Ilow•vrer, the 3101'ER will flat be hall Iiahl•, for 1h111lar�s re,aping from delays tine to riot:, strikes, or other unforsceable
nceidrut: or firer_ of nature or arts• beyond his control.
'I'h• MOVE.11 agrees to Inawpurt :ctid Intibiiar upon Um following terms:
ll
�lnoving and lifting a building and shallclearall ttrees and blat and othertoil
ol clr i lions if
tttile new ,lueaAS liono permit the free
P. TilE fIUYI•Iit allall provide all ese:n•atinn and adequate finding; or blocks upon which the building Is to most at the
Place of d61i'MU011 as iastrucled by 31OVER.
:1. After Ir:ning the public highway, till w•rilles clearances tram property owners, such as trimming trot:, use of roads
and slreels, uiiieb urc necesetry In move the building ;long the. route design:dt:d, shall be obtained and pawl for by the
lit 1'I•:It.
IltoII for
d lobtain
nnonbpost
all bonds 5rhstttall laws, r rules orregulalinx tupartaintothemovigr tile uildhngnhiehis theobjectoftiscontrac, ahen wJO,alion
I,. 'file BUYER shall lint hold till' MOVE31 liable for damnges to the sidewalk in moving the structure from the street
to Ilia now location and shall save bartideas lira DIOVER front any claim of liability for dmnages to such sidewalks by any
ol.ber pnrly.
I,. The MOVER agrees to nave the huildiag in a good workmanlike manner. The MOVER agrees to carry workman's
rumpcasalimn and pabbie liability insur. ller.
7. The BUYER understands that he is purchaing the buildingg as is and assumes all responsibility for deteriomtion or
defective rendition of sills and beams and the ordinary stresves tall risks of moving, including but not limited to, dome as
to lho ehtnmey, roofing, shingles and gutters, also including nondflal cracks which may occur in the plaster, The BUYER
further warrants he has the right to place the building 11Ion the promises described above, as nyminst all other parties, and
agrees to save harmless the MOVER for nay liability will reimburse the 310VER for any liability imposed by reason of a
defect in or failure of his rights of title in this respect.
9. The Dto%,ER shall be entitled to interest at the rate of .... .8...... %. per annum upcol any payment in default under
the terns of this agreement. The 310"It Shan also be entitled to all costs inmured, including reasonable attorney fees for
enforcing all), payment, under the terms of this agreement by riling and enforcing a mechanic's lien or other appropriate legal
remedy.
9. The BUYER further att,,•Mes that he will promptly pay for all letter and material to Imo furnished for the improvement
Of the prenisrStunto whirl salt slrucnnre is to be moved, and will not permit any merhanics' liens to be riled against said
premises, he intent and Inn -pose of this provision being that the UOVER shall be entitled to a first and paramount lien for
the payment of all sums due him and to become due him under the terms of this contract
10. Bldgs, will be enclosed on all four sides by Mover with a 5/8" grooved fir siding and
16" on center stud walls,
11, dyer aApAnmc�gr� a6nc� some of the inside, paneling and some of the exterior roof
closin s iwii a un inished.
The BUYER agrees to complate the basement or feeling .....30 days after moving the building to the new location,
in order to allow mayor to remove his timbers, blocking and other equipment The BUYER agrees to reimburse the mover for
All delays which result in tyhrg up mover's equipment.
This contract IS binding upon still insures to tine henefit of the heir, administrators, executors or assigns of the BUYER
tmd the 31oVER as theme paths are thcuwcives bound.
lu witness whereat the parties have hereunto affixed their signature the day and year first above written.
Witness: .................................................................................... BUYER ....... ............................... .........
.............».
1110VEItlo,ffCCh 1f.. : A�....
...........
PROPOSAL AND CONTRACT
IIiOM Stonco Constructi o Canq>any
IM County Road N
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55,132
Proposal Submitted To
Name Cr, ff o f /Il ��.•, os l �. =✓ ----..
City sf,_PnE.i_ ni�.�_Sslit -__--
Telephone
Job Site Legal Description
Proposal No. /
Sheet No. /
Date 9%t�rez
Work To Be Performed At
Street
f.ity _ _.._..--- State —
Date of Plans_
Arch teCt_�_,^
Job Site Phone _ ,
We hereby propose to furnish all the materials and perform all
:or• the completion of —..Y1%@,�1
--__._�.�-��-.C1•�J[Lr�L•Z���ry •1 �1�.Ir.1.---CJ.1- �/��
the labor necessary
c
All material is guaranteed to be as specified, and the above work to be performed
in accordance with the drawings and specifications submitted for above work and
conpletc.i in a substantial workmanlike manner for the sum of Dollars ($ yP& L
This proposal may be withdrawn by us if not accepted within 30 _ days. Any portion
of the contract price which remains unpaid 30 days after completion of last item of
of labor or after delivery of last item of material shall be subject to a finance
charge of _ / per month on the unpaid balance.
Accepted: The above prices, specification OUR SIGNATURE HERE CREATES A CONTRACT:
and conditions are hereby accepted. You are
authorized to do the work as specified. Signature ate
Payment will be made as outlined above.
rignature Date
All material is guaranteed to be as specified.
All work is to be completed in a workmanlike manner according to standard practices and
applicable building codes.
Any alteration or deviation from the stated specifications involving extra costs will
be executed only upon written change orders, and will become an extra charge over and
above the contract price stated herein.
Completion of all contracts is specifically contingent upon strikes, accidents, or
delays beyond our control.
Owner to carry fire, tornado, hazard, and other necessary insurances upon above
work.
Our workers are fully covered by workmen's compensation insurance.
A
PROPOSAL -AND CONTRACT Propcsai No. Z
1710 Stenco ConStruttion Company Sheet NO. /
295fi County Road 11
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55432 D+,te 9/Z 7 / L
Proposal Submitted To
Name ._(;J.
:; u•ee t�.
C i ty .....5:
State _
Telephone
I
Work To Be Performed At
Street
City____•--__ State
Date of Plans_
Architect
Job Site Phone
Job Site legal Description �Ly�.uc,p�srJ�
---_.. -_...�
- --.......__.._......_...__......—�....._.
lie hereby propose to furnish all the
for the completion of
Ul-
als and perform all the labor necessary
All material is guaranteed to be as specified, and the above work to be performed
in accordance with the drawings and specifications submitted for above work and
completed in a substantial workmanlike manner for the sum of Dollars ($ )•
This proposal may be withdrawn by us if not accepted within ? o days. Any portion
of the contract price which remains unpaid 30 days after completion of last item of
of labor or after delivery of last item of material shall be subject to a finance
charge of I Y4 per month on the unpaid balance.
By: —
Accepted: The above prices, specificatio�UR SIGNATURE HERE CREATES A CONTRACT:
and conditions are hereby accepted. You are
authorized to do the work as specified. 7gn`ature ate e
Payment will be made as outlined above.
Signature ---Date
All material is guaranteed to be as specified.
All work is to be completed in a workmanlike manner according to standard practices and
applicable building codes,
Any alteration or deviation from the stated specifications invoiving extra cusLs will
be executed only upon written change orders, and will become an extra charge over and
above the contract price stated herein.
Completion of all contracts is specifically contingent upon strikes, accidents, or
delays beyond our control.
Owner to carry fire, tornado, hazard, and other necessary insurances upon above
work.
Our workers are fully covered by workmen's compensation insurance.
MEMO TO: The Mounds View City *Fcyk
r
FROM: Bruce K. Anderson, DiParks, Recreation and
DATE: October 6, 1982
RE: Golden Gloves Boxing Program
Attached is a memo which was forwarded to the Mounds View Parks and Recreation
Commission on August 25, 1982 relating to the Golden Gloves Boxing Program.
As can be noted, staff discussed the issue with the Parks and Recreation
Commission and requested a recommendation as to whether or not the
Commission felt it was a beneficial to our department.
Following a great deal of discussion, the Parks and Recreation Commission
adopted a motion which was made by Commissioner Bowman and seconded by Com-
missioner Silvis to endorse the Golden Gloves Boxing Program in the City of
Mounds View and direct staff to provide office and administrative assistance
as well as scheduling/permit priority through the School District. The motion
was adopted unanimously: 6 ayes, 0 nayes. It should be further noted that
_. the Park Commission directed staff to review the program within six months
to see how the program had evolved to determine what problems, if any, had
developed.
At this time, the program has commenced under a general permit from the School
District and staff would like to raise this issue once again with the City
Council as we have been requested some support services for this program.
The specific services that have been requested include: publicity in the
City Newsletter, coordination with local newspapers to promote the program
and formal endorsement if possible. Staff once again has no formal recom-
mendation on this issue other than they concur with the Parks and Recreation
Commission direction to review the program after six months and attempt to
try it on a trial basis to detenlline how the program has evolved and determine
what problems, if any, have developed.
Should you have any questions regarding this program or the City's potential
involvement, feel free to contact myself at extension 41, and staff will be
on hand at Monday evenings meeting to discuss this question should any problems
or issues arise.
BKA/sll
MEMO TO: Mounds View Park and Recreation Commission
FROM: Staff
DATE: August 25, 1982
RE: Golden Glove Boxing Program
Staff received a request approximately six months ago from Mr. John Holmes
regarding the establishment, and support of a Golden Gloves Boxing Program
in the City of Mounds View. Staff provided Mr. Holmes with a letter of
support indicating that our department would be willing to support their
new association with whatever means possible. The City Council directed
staff to rescind their position for two reasons, the first being it is not
staff's role to endorse programs without the City Council permission and
secondly they had some reservations regarding the establishment of the
Golden Gloves Boxing Program from a health, safety and welfare perspec-•
tive.
ti Mr. Holmes has requested endorsement of the program once again through our
department as he is looking for school usage and would like to use our
department's priority for securing a permit. The current process for securing
permits is to submit them in early September for fall programs to the
school district who in turn prioritize them with the school district
receiving first priority, municipal recreation departments second, commun-
ity groups third and outside school district residents a fourth priority.
It would appear that Mr. Holmeswould need our priority system to secure
the time that he would need at Edgewood Junior High for his boxing program.
Staff is raising this issue through the Park Commission with no recommendation
as to the benefits of a boxing program but request your direction as to
whether or not you feel our department's priority should be allocated for
a boxing program. Staff will be expanding upon this program and our depart-
ment's priority ramifications at Thursday's meeting.
1 ew
0,ighton
M
M
(
•
N
w March 30, 1982
Q
F
O
M
w
Z Mr. Jon L. Halmes
5012 Londondary Avenue
f 55112
z
0
H
x
fa
3
w
z
M
O
z
O
x
c7
CO3
w
z
LL
0
F
U
New Brighton, MN
Dear Jon,
I would like to commend your efforts to form a Golden Gloves
program for the New Brighton/Mounds View area.
With the current financial outlook for municipalities and
schools, it is especially important that volunteers be
encouraged to provide activities for our youth.
Generally, volunteer recreational programs are run more
cost effectively and have a broader participation.
Be t wishes a d good luck.
Gregory B. Harcus
Mayor.
GBH/jf
F
Q
Fo-
N
w
z
z
i
3
.:
w
�z
J1
Q
to
m
ro
0
00
z
0
E-
T_
ym
T
W
z
ew
1
Wrighton police department
FJarch 24, 1902
Jon L. Holmes
5012 Londonary Avenue
Now Brighton, Minnesota 55112
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
It is my understanding that Mr. Jon Holmes is planning to
start a Golden Gloves boxing program at Edgewood Junior
High next fall.
I feel that having a boxing program in the area would be
beneficial to the kids as Iong as the program is supervised.
Paul T. Holmes, Jr.
Chief of Police
f
PAUL T. HOLMES JR.
CHIEF OF POLICE
DAVID SIGVERTSEN
�autt JUVENILE OFFICER
PUBLIC RELATIONS
DAVID BROUILLET
INVESTIGATOR
S'PATIi O1' �17 \ liSq'1'A
•,•fill ,;m•r.,rs,nr
e
.1,.nr.u'r IL quiz
Uuciawnu
Dear Friends:
It is a pleasure to extend warm greetings to
the. participants and fans of the Upper Midwest
Golden Gloves Tournament. To the competitors and
coaches I send a special welcome.
The sport of boxing combines strength, skill,
coordination and endurance, providing athletic
competition which is exciting for all. The accomp-
lishments of this fine group of young people surely
have a positive impact, not only on their own lives,
but, also, on the lives of others.
�* Best of luck to all competitors and welcome
to all fans. It is my sincerest hope the tournament
will be enjoyable for all.
Si ,
6A;TBERT H.
GOVERNOR
4
�. UITY OF SAINT PAUL
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
5
f 517 CITY HALL
� SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55102
GEORGE LATIME•R (612) 298•4323
MAYOR
March 19, 1982
Upper Midwest Golden Gloves Tournament
Dear Friends:
It is a pleasure to have you in the Twin Cities for the
Upper Midwest Golden Gloves Tournament. The Golden
Gloves program offers good eNperiences for young men in
9 sports and provides appropriate training and development
—011 opportunities along the way.
I hope you enjoy the tournament, as participants and
observers, and have a great time while you are in the
Twin Cities. I am confident you will find the many
restaurants, shops and accommodations to meet your needs
and invite you to take advantage of these facilities
during your visit here.
Best wishes and good luck to sill
Sincerely,
eo e a er
Ma
GL:bz
y 1
COP'S CARE
•SPONSOR OF THE
CITY TOURNAMENT SINCE 1974
s PURCHASES 1500 TICKETS YEARLY
(DISTRIBUTED TO YOUTH GROUPS)
sSUPPORTS POLICE GYM PROGRAMS
I'RI 11111 V INVUI V11)
Il'llll
d01 Ot N GL WrS
or
THEY WOULDN'T BE COPS
SUBURBAN LAW ENFORCEMENT ASSOCIATION •
SUPPORTS GOLDEN GLOVE BOXING
Co•Sponsors.of Minneapolis•Suburban Tournament
Executive Director
1hrly.Davie
IDA Tower - Glh floor
Minnrapolia, a1N 55402 ,
(612F376.7028 lot
1Gt21375.7029 tot r
.�19EGION I
AoOsr Yount'y, Ruppional Director
10211 S. Codor R. Rd.
sdila 317
:•mmnionkd. MN 55343
.', I lour 1311o110 Service
p:L'q 542.9056 •
i:rooklyn Center, '
Suburban North Boslrig,Club
Brooklyn Cerlor Sr. High School
r,5in A I lnmboldl Ave No.
Co,;:h! vantn:1 00,1010 1
,•.,I Iwt l.vc It%
• $ r..:p,,:, MN 55433
• ! .JI, fill 565-550D (0)
.-wn flaplds
Coon Rapids Boxing Club
Fred Moore Junior High School,
11123 Washinglon,Avo., Anoka .
Coach: Joel Marsh
Darwin Copgar •
28291191h Avo. N.W.
Coon Rapids. MN 55433
(612) 421.9563 (h)
(612) 4j1.3300 (0) •i
Hopklns
Hopkins
Heed Coach: bill Jags
125 Mumoo S. -6
IloPkins,MN• r:.-
545•W11 :�•
Mlnneapolls
1 Bays Club
1 410Irving Ave. No.
1 ;each: Dennis Goner
' 521•01
City In. Boxing Club
Coach: John Pnehaeo, Sr.
1536 E. Lake St. -
729.7655
...:; del•:
1PL Ill P 1411, 1
'9\\1
1.aL,W
T
ill 1, Ilan
East Side noxing Club
1929 N E. Second Sr
769.2a59
Coach: Goorgn Glover
3355 York Ave. No.
'Minneapolis, MN 65422 ..
508.3255 - 645.0451-
All Notions Boxing Club
2300 Cedar Ave..
Coach: Curtis L. buckonagn
716 Upton Avo. No,
Minnoapolls, MN 55411
521.4547
John Poupart
724-8226
N.E.R.0. Boxing Club
39G5 Central Ave.•N,E.
Minneapolis, MN 55401
Coach: Robert N. Sandvik
2500 Gerhold Ave N.E.
Minneapolis. MN P418'
701.4252 (h); 347.2360 (0)
Sabslanl Boxing Club
310 E. 3131 h S1.
Minneapolis, N
Sough Control Minn. Boxing Clu-j
32nd 6 Stevens
Coach: Rover Keller '
(612)827.6375
Mary Clark
071.7568
U of M Boxing'Club
Memorial Stadium
North Tower, Room 206
Coach: William J. Koohn
2348 Wellswood Curve
Bloomington. MN 55431
883J654 (h):874.2637In)
MoeY Gym
Coach: David Mae
5612 Slit St. N.E
'Fridioyy, MN 55 32
•(612) 57I.5612
Shakopee
Shnkopoe Police Boxing Club
476 Gorman Police Dept.
Shakopee, MN
Couch: Ron Carlson
(612) 445•G674
Lakevllle
J.F. Kennedy Efem. School
Coach: Scott Lecy
463.8196,
Minneapolls,•1
M•T Boxing Club 1'
REGION 2
Donnaq Nelson, negiwlal Ditnclor
1715 Edgerlon St
81. Poll. MN 55117
774.514A (1-; 744:952810)
Jim rare -!,::^k. +; •Mitnl Director
Htisling..
Haslinge Roxlfe.:)'
V.F.W. Post 1210
I lcstings. MN
Coach: Jerry LaCoursiorre
90D E. Second
Hastings; MN 55033
tT'4509
Paul
•vv St. Boxing Club
Washington Jr. High
Coachi Jay Pelrer, Sonny Polzer
2650 Pascal
nosrv44r. MN
633-171"1-• 488-2822
Initial, City Rnxing Club
Inner City youth LoagOe
175 No. Victoria
St Paul, MN 55104
222.25?3
Coach: Gone Whifo
St Paul. MN 55104 .... .
645.6519 - 647.9539
Mexican Amer can Boxing Club
10110ons Blult Inyglound
2G2 Botos Ave
St. Paul, MN 55913
Coach: Cli"011 ydnel
1042 Wilson
St Paul, M1455 WIG
776•0736
Conch; Tony HuhpOn
3225 Sydney
St. Paul MN 55107
222.917b
4.-
.North St. Paul .
North SI.,Psul Boxing Club
American Lo.11on Post 39
Collcfk ::"hn Mothewa
lla 151h St. ,140. •
Ooklaad. MN 55119
738.8622• ,
White Bear
White Beer Boxing Club,
Nelldnnl Gunid Armoury'
Co-sponsor. White Bear Police
Dept. 8 257 Military Policy
Coach: Don Weller '
5510 W. Bald Es to Blvd.
White Bear, MN 551 W
420.3014
Coach: Dick Gaffey
Conch Larry Goodman,
Coach: Tom Schauesey
REGION 3 '
Warren Dobersleln, Reg. Director
728 Bin St. No.
Wahpetmt, N.D 56075
1701) 642.5251
Br!3k Schloner, Asst. Director
Gardh9r, N.D.
Coach: Bill DIIIIy
Gardner, N.D. 58036
1701) 484.5272
Wahpeton; N.D.
Coach: Brian Schlener
717 BIh St. No •
Wahpoton, N D. 58075
. (701)642.2535• .
Parsh9(I, N.D.
Coach: Jack Dwyer
PershaR, N.D.58136
(701J 4j7.8111
Conch: Rob Welsh
Paishall, N.D. 58138
1701)862.3410
Mldot; N.D..
Coach Larry Emerson
1324 Sq. Main
Minot. N.D. 58701
(101) 039.6074
50
09"-,1
Orient, S.D.
Orient Boring Club
Coack Larry Aesoph
.Orient 8.D. 57345
Hlghmors Boxing Club
Coack Oscar lie an
'Orient, S.D. $7349
Rulhton
Rulhlon Boxing Club
Coack James Robot
Rulhlon, MN
(507) 655.3%8
Pipestone
Plpalone Boeing Club
Coack Oreg Martens
Box 405
PI estone, MN 58164
(507) 625-5926
Russell
Ru::afl Boxing Club
Coack Ron Itook
Russell, MN
(507) 023.4300
Tracy
Tracy Boxing Club
Coack Tim Hohler
Tracy, MN 56175
(507) 629.3451
Madison, S.D.
Madleon Boeing Club
Coack John Niomann
626 Fast Center Street
Madison, S.D. 57042
�605j 250.9111 joj
Huron, S.D.
Huron Boxing Club
Coack Ron UFortune
Assistant: Dick Docker
Huron, S.D. 57350
(605) 352.5313
Flandreau, S.D.
Flandreau Boxing Club
Coack Harold Frank
Flandreau,S.D.57028
(605) 997.3024
Coach; to rty Crentz'
Flandrau, 6.D. 57026
Peever, S.D.
Ela slao-Wshpelon Boxing Club
Come% Norbert Jones
Palaver , S.D. 67257
932-3719
Mitchell, S.D.
Mitchell Boxing Club
Coack Robert Ellefson
Coack Roper Erickson
Mitchell, S.D. 57301
Sioux Falls, S.D.
Sioux Falb Boys Club
Coack Joe Taylor
2o17 E. 31st N.
Sioux Fells, S.D.
(605) 338-0867
Yankton, S.D.
Coack Ry Pool
Yankton. D. 67079
(605) 665.3009
Eagle Butte, S.D.
Coack Dick Schremp
Eagle Butte, S.D. 57625
REGION 7
Dick Horribly, III, Regional Dlr.
1731 Marylme
N. Mankato. MN 56001
'147� 625.6772'h)
Sol 387.0530 (o
Dillon Rick Assistant Director
002 N. Holcombe
Litchfield, MN W55
(812) 693.6358 (h)
Bello Plalne r
Bell@ Plains Golden Gloves
Delta Plalne, MN 58011
Coack Richard A. Merlin
R. 2, Box 44
Bello Plains, MN 56011
(612) 873.6631 (a)
Fairmont
Fairmont Boxlna Club
1017 East First Stroel
Fairmont, MN 56031
Glencoe
Glencoe Boxing Team
Coach: Earl Willhus
R.R. 2
Glencoe, MN 553M
(612) 664.3064
LeCenter
LeCenter Boxing Club
American Legion Poet 108
LaContor, MN 56057
Coack Dr. Petrick D. O'Keefe
270 North Waterville Ave.
LeConler, MN 56057
(2)-.16812A0�o
(i Litchfield
Lllchlleld Boxing Club
Litchfield Police Dept.
Litchfield Jaycees
Coack Dolton D. Rick
602 North Holcombe
Litchfield, MN 55355
693.6358 (h)
Mankato
Mankato Boxing Club
Box 1244
Mankato, MN WWI
Coack Jerry Clyne
Willmar
Willmar Golden Glenn
Willmar Jaycees
P.O. Box 1031
Willmar, MN 56201
Coack Jim Carlson
806 S.W. 5Ih St.
(612) 235.6328
Albert Lee
Coack Jessie Jiminez
1608 Lakewood Ave.
Albert Lee, MN 56007
(507) 373-0057 (h)
St. James
Coack John Kulsolh
602 71h Ave.
St. James, MN 56081
(507) 375-5778(h)
Wells - Easton
Coack Dave Telamantez
660 41h Ave. S.W.
Wells, MN 56097
(507) 553•SW
REGION 8
Bell Sternberg, Director
Kehler H01e1
301 -2nd Ave. S.W.
Rochester, MN 55901
(507) 288-7176
Merton Herrick, Asst. Director
Slewnnvllle. MN 55978
(507) 533.4433
Rochester
Coach: John Co518110
Jail SE Merlon nd.
Rochester, MN 55901
(507) 289-1344
Coach: Larry Glenn
RFD 2
Eyota. LAN 55934
Eyota
Whllewater Boxing Club
Coach: Chuck Johnson
14 W. Slh St.
Eyore, MN 55634
(507) 545.2079
Coach: Duane Horsman
Eyola, MN 55934
Faribaull
Coach: Dennis Dusbakho
29 S.W. 1st Ave.
Faribaull. MN 55021
(507) 334.5004
Winona
Coach: Mika Summerville
Box 1448, St. Marys Calla90
Winona, MN 55937
,U191 492-4432
LaCrosse, WI
Coack Gerhard Hirsch
1820 Eastwood Lane
LaCrosse, WI 54001
(608) 788.0034
Aral. Coack George Morkos r
LaCrosse, WI
765-0302
Owatonna
owalonns Boxing Club
Coack Roger Standke
United Farm Agency Inc.
451.3186
Pine Island
dCoach: John Lenn
307 - 5th St. SW
Fine Island, MN 55963
1507) 356-8367
Coack J. Hitchcock
724 - 91h St. S.W.
Pine Island, MN 55963
(507) 356-4332
Austin
Coack Davo Buxton
819 - 2nd Ave. NE
Austin, MN 55912
(507) 433.3246
Coach: Don Nelson
1910.61h Ave. S.E.
Austin, MN 55912
(507) 433.0407
Dodge Center
Coack Tim Swanson
Rt.1, Box M24
Dodge Confer, MN 65027
(507) 374-6M
(Jlibbo-
oh,
17
7e
MrH23
H 4ppySE, r1��MpyiNk
Fiber Well'. e11311,ees'Ohl
--- I nedwhne a Blue. LemAu2n.
Cullnie. T0019 COW.
Chlmene, Imported Boon
end Soh-eppee 0114 Iapoo.
Well
Gann Bell
IleuenneN
Heilman Llihl
Counlry Club sees
52
'Fargo, N.D.
Coach: Pal Eno
1845 So. 171h er
Far gpo. N.D.58102 I-
(701) 237.9057
Coach: Ken Rolle
1834 81h Ave. S.
Fargo, N.D. 58102
235.0012
Jamestown, N.D.
Coach: Wayne FelyyinCo
Jamestown, NO 50401
(701) 627.426D
Coach: Gary Vollrath
Jamestown, N D. 58401
(701) 252.6245
Grand Forks, N.D.
Coach: Bob Hill
1113 281h Aver So.
Grand Forks, N.D. 58201
(7oi) 775-0231
Coach: Henry Junlunon
1113 281h Ave. So.
Grand Forks, N.D. 58201
Coach: Richard Ouasnoll
I I II Cottonwood
Grand Forks, N.D. 50207
(701)775.7882
Fergus Falls, MN
Coach: Russ Johnson
221 East Alcoot Ave.
Fergus Fells. MN 56537
12to1 ,au-ro,c
Coach: John Ugsled
Foroous Fells, MN 56537
(21D)281.5070
Valley City, N1D.
Coach: Mick Kveiv
.,Box 113
Valley Clty. N.D. 58072
645-4416
Ft. Totten, N.D.
Coach: Ambrose Lllllowlnd
Ft. Tolten, N.D 58335
CoschK, D. Dauphinals
Box 292
Ft. Tolten, N.D. 58335
7664165
Ft. Yates, N.D:
Coach: R. B. Lugper
Ft. Yates, N.D. 5936
Cosch: Duane Phllli
Ft. Yates, N.D. 58533
(701) $54-7567
Mlinor, N.D.
Coach: Mike Anderson
1409 911% Ave. N.W.
Mlnol, N.D. 58701
852-6311
Coach: C. Fredrickson
3113 S. Mein
Minor, N.D. 58701
838-3875
Fairview, MT
Coach: Mal Miller
Box 3D5
Fairview, MT 59221-
(4D6) 747.5601
Bismarck, N.D.
Coach: Ed Moore
Bismarck, N.D. 56538
(701) 255.3285 Ext, 252
Coach: Del Seelye
c/o Moose Club
Bismarck, N.D.58501
(7oi) 223.2920
Coach: Jack Pudwell
3072 Manchester Dr.
8iemarck, N.D. 58501
222.1591
Belcourl, N.D.
Coach: Ray Poiuslan
Bolcourl, N.D. $8316
(701) 477.6111 Ext. 237
Barnesville, MN
Coach: Denis Soblzak
ART
Barnesville. MN 56574
(218) 493.4529 1
Williston, N.D.
Coach: Bruce Wooly
Box 424
Williston, N.D. 58801
(701) 572.3553
Coach: Rick Woodward
Box 1641
Williston, N.D. 58601
572.0958
Newtown, N.D.
Coach: T. Woilin000f
Nuwlown, N.D. 50763
(701) 627-7280
Dickinson, N.D.
Coach: G, Worlinppof
Dickinson, N.D. SB501
(701) 225.9G84
Breckenridge, MN
Coach: Donnie Zioglor
126 No. 2nd
Brockonridgo, MN 56102
(218) 643-4432
Hawley, MN
Coach: Loran Jol'vig
Box 760
Hawley, MIN 56549
(218) 937.5762
Dunselth, N.D.
Coach: Harry Policy
Ounsoith, N.D. 58329
854-7557
Watford City, N.D.
Coach: Loroy Rogness
Box 83
Watford City, N.D.
842-2451
Hettinger, N.D.
Coach: M. Worlinger
Box 1111
Hollinger, N.D. 58839
567.4394
REGION 4
Los Sellnow, Rogional Director
RI. 11, Box 5
Brainard, MIN 56401
Brainerd
Coach: Tom Herron
Route 9, Box 203
Brainerd, MN 56101
(218) 829-8816
Coach: Mark Herron
At. 5, Box 40
Brainerd, MN 56401
Detroit Lakes
Boys Club
Coach: John Aggullar
710 Randolph Road
Detroit Lakes, MN 56501
(218) 647.4670
Cass Lake
Coach: Henry Harper
Route 2, Box 308
Case Lake, MN 56633
(218) 335.2207
Park Rapids
Coach: Mike Long
Route 4
Park Rapids, MN S6470
(218) 732.3828
New York Mille
Coach: Simon. Olsen
New York Mills, MN 56467
(218) 385.3996
Perham
Coach: LeRoy Atkinson
Roule 2. Box 46
Perham. MN 56573
(218) 346.3996
Wadena
Coach: Bob Tubandl
21S SW 4th
Wartime, MN 56482
(218) 631.3613
Coach: Jim Merickel
Box 187
Wadono, MN 56482
St. Cloud
Coach: John Wilkon
1431 Washington Mom. Dr.
St. Cloud, MN 56301
(612) 253-1057
Motley
Coach: Gary Wentworth
Roule 1, Box 9
Mollay, MN SU66
Red Lake
Coach: Marvin Yellow
Box 1D4
Red Lake, MN 56671
(218) 679-3765
Sebeka
Cosch: Ken Schoon
Route 3, Box 152
Sebeka, MN 56477
(218)837-5270
Perham
Independent
Coach: Rod Fudgn
Route 2
Perham, MN 56473
(218) 346.6083
Coach: Wayne Lehman
RI.2, Box 333A
Perham, MN 56573
Mille Lacs
Coach- Roggle Gerbow
Rural Roule. Box 196
Onamia, MN :6359
(612) 532.4442
Ponsford
Coach: Chuck Buckenaga
Ponsford, MN 56575
Coach: Jar Buckanage
Ponslord, MN 56575
Bemidji
Coach: Jim Lafriniaro
216 Minnesota Ave.
Bamldll, MN 56601
Redby, MN
Coach: Gary Thunder
Redby, MN 56670
Park Rapids, MN
Coach: John Gribble
Itasca Star Roule
Park Rapids, MN 56470
Pelican Rapids, MN
Coach: Richard Sherbrooke
At. 2
Pelican Rapids, MN $6573
Little Falls, MN
Coach: Gary Burgandl
1000 N.E. 7Ih St.
Little Fells, MN 56345
REGION 5
Pelt Flllppl, Regional Director
Box 154
Keewatin, MN 55753
770.6937
Hibbing
Hibbinpp Municipal Athletic
Asaoc.lnc.
Box 236
Hibbing, KIN 55748
Coach: Frank Modich
2027 3rd Ave. East
Hlbbingg, MN 55748
263.6368
Duluth
Arrowhead Amateur Boxing Assoc.
P.O. Box 423
Duluth, MN 558DI
Coach: Jerry LoGerdo
1940 Springvale Road
Duluth, MN S5811
(218) 727.6935
Conch: Louis Andrews
Rio. 3. Box 5
SuPPerlor, WI54BSD
382.1922
CoacR Jack Iuttle
3315 Vernon St.
Duluth, MN 55806
624.5323
Coach: Jesus Roses
2329 W. 10th St.
Duluth, MN 558DS
727-0932
Coach: Jahn Fairchild
9424 Grand Avenue
Duluth, MN 55SW
626.1168
Winnipeg
Pan Am Boxing Club
Coach: Ed Yeremchuk
271 Furby St.
Winnippeegg, Manitoba
R3C,2AD Canada
Cosch: Arnold Prince
Box 018, Group 360
6377 Henderson Hy.
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Blwablk
Blweblk Basin Club
Blwablk, MN R708
Coach: Andy Llcarl
Blwablk, MN 557DB
Conch: Bruce Bellavance
Box 408
Blwablk, MN 55708
865.6469
Grand Marais, MN
Cosch: Dale Bockovlch
Grand Morals, MN
865-6489
Big Fork, MN
Coach: Tom Nelson
At. 1, Box 394
81gg Fork, MN 56628
743.3435
REGION 6
Joe To tor, Regional Director
South Cola
Gary Erickson, Regional Director
Minnesota
51
1982 UPPER MIDWEST .
N GLUWE3
�'R- NA Mu N T
MARCH 19 - 20 --- 21
I'RESF.NTED AT THE. MINNEAPOLIS AUDITORIUM; MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA,
SPONSORED 'BY GOLDEN GLOVES, INC..
SANCTIONED BY MINNESOTA STATE BOXING COMMISSION
TOURNAMENT. DInt:CT0i1, GE0116E REITER A
OFFICIALS
JUDGES
REFEREES
TIMEKEEPERS
Esther Young, Chirl Judyr
Jerry I 1t;IP ?••.•IHrI
Tom Mellen
I "t�0y '' ' '
Torn Mellen, Chief ilmekeeper
Jerry Bit: Ai
^u, cierein
Will Perra
fivera Erickson
( .-'•. riles
taay1e Perra
Al Burke
Merl 1 ,• nick
Lenora James
James Griatall r
6ary Mieiwa
Dan Weslburg
' 4
pat resimn
Denny Nelson
Mike Thomas
Srrr N,+mr:;un
George Reiter J;'.
Bobby Andrich
--�
;Aceur+Dy
Steve Sperry
hotly Snyder
i lnbot
Jerry LeGarde
Ivan ty
lark Lukas
Manny Melendez
W,?I ?e Hass
ie H
lioxnnnu Shaughnessy
Jim Perrault
Dan Berhow
DaveBloomberg
CHIEF SECOND
Joe Kambeitz ��
wilt rd;urs
Wall
.::, Bergeron
Rill Holstein
OCTORS •
trick Flynn, Chia/Doctor1,NiV0UNCERS
Mies
Jchn Longie
ul Severson
CD
lira Minnick
en Irwin
Larson
Wayne Hassvid
TlZjaMS AND REGIONAL DIRECTORS
TEGION 5, Hibbing
REGION 1, Minneapolis
Peter Fillippi
Roger Young
SECRETARY
RE(3ION 6, Madison So. [
Dave Buxton
Joe Taylor
RI_GION 2,St, Paul
Greg Martin
OonnKNelson
I" ;110 Mankato
Assl: Jim Filzpauicl,
Dickk N
�mr
REGION 3, Wahpeton N.D.
Warren Dobershmi
Asst: Deell Rick
nt-GION 6, Rochester
REGION 4, Brainmd, MN
Ben Sternberg
I.vs Sullnow
Asst: Mert Herrick
11
\Y
way a a 6AA 6�w?
By
Lou Winston
Ilie may be the only child or have five sisters and/or seven
brothers.
A Golden Glover may be a little fellow of 4Y or a giant of
6Y.
He may be a tender 18 year old of 250 pounds, or a jockey
size matured young man of 26.
lie may be gaunt or lean, but is mostly muscular.
He may be a 61h grade dropout or a student attending
college.
lie maybe single, or a divorcee of 19, or married and a father
of six.
lie might not smoke or drink, because of the rigid training
program required of a Golden Glover.
He may be a boy who travels more than 100 miles five nights
a week, merely in train, 2nd may refuse to run ,n errand of
one block for his wife or mother.
He may be a boy who sacrifices pleasure for days, weeks,
yes, months of strenuous training just to enter the Golden
Gloves and make a good showing.
He may be a plumber or a barber, a machinist or a
policeman, a laborer or a cook, a student or a school
teacher. He may be unemployed.
He may be rich or of wealthy parents, or have a mediocre
Income, but usually has difficulty balancing his books
financially.
He may be a son of foreign born parents, but he almost
without exception is a United States citizen by birth.
He may be Japanese, Mexican, English, Swedish,
Norwegian, Irish, Italian, Polish or Jewish.
He may be a negro or white, or an Indian, or a mixture of
Chinese and American.
He may be from every state in the union, including Hawaii
and Alaska.
He may possess the ambition to become a World's
Champion and enter the professional field in boxing, or he
may end his career in the Golden Gloves with only one fight.
He may be an ex -serviceman or one to be inducted soon
after the close of a Golden Gloves Tournament.
lie may be a boy separated from home only once, or he may
be a restless one who wanders.
He Is the type of a fellow who expends every ounce of
energy in the ring for a medal or trophy, instead of lighting
for cash.
He is a young man alone in the ring with his opponent, with
no one to run interference for him and no one to whom to
pass the ball when the going gets rough.
He is a youth searching for a rainbow —to see —to touch —to
grasp —and to keep.
This —my friends —is a GOLDEN GLOVER.
38
7ks and Recreation Commission Meeting
.: *dnutes
... i14"August 26, 1902
Page four
GOLDEN GLOVES BOXING
PROGRAM:
Staff reviewed the memo regarding the potential of establishing
the Golden Gloves Boxing Program in the City of Mounds View.
Ile stated that a Mr. John Holmes, a Mounds View resident, was
interested in establishing a Mounds View Golden Gloves Boxing
Program and requested from the city staff to receive permit
priority and program endorsement from the city Parks and Recre-
ation Department. After lengthy discussion as to the merits of
Golden Glove Boxing and how it would interelate to the other
athletic associations within the city, a motion was made by
Commissioner Bownan and seconded by Commissoner Silvis to
endorse the Golden Gloves Boxing Program in the City of Mounds
View and direct staff to provide office and administrative
assistance as well as scheduling/permit priorities through the
school district. Motion was adopted unanimously.
6 ayes
0 nayes
The Park Commission farther directed staff to review the program
within six months to see how the program had evolved and determine
if any problems had developed.
MID -SEASON FORESTRY
REPORT:
Director Anderson reviewed the mid -season forestry report and
stated that the forestry program had an extremely successful year
with over 900 plantings. He further stated that he felt the
addition of Odis Newton and Ken Lelm as forestry assistants had
greatly enhanced the park system and city public grounds.
PROPOSALS FOR DONATI616
FROM JAYCEE WOMEN:
Staff reviewed the memo which outlined a number of proposals
for possible expenditures of the generous donation of money from
the Mounds View Jaycee Women. Following staff reports and a
general discussion a motion was made by Chairperson Burmeister
seconded by Commssioner Weflin to place a youth tot/baby swing
at Hillview Park, to construct a glider swing at Silver View Park
which was to be placed on the top of the sliding hill in sleeves
and thirdly to construct a sand volleyball court at Groveland
Park. The motion passed unanimously.
6 ayes
0 nayes
STAFF REPORT:
Staff reviewed the monthly report and discussed the summer C.E.T.A.
crew as well as the future developments of the Groveland Park
fund raising committee.
ADJOURNMENT:
A motion was made by Commissioner Bowman, seconded by Commissioner
Weflin to adjourn the meeting at 9:25 p.m. The motion passed
unanimously.
6 ayes
��
1 .14 0 nayes
��hu 13
MEMO TO: Mounds View City Council
p FROM: Bruce K. Anderson,'6ir n
Parks, Recreation a o
DATE: • I
October 6, 1982
RE: 1982 N.R.P. Congress
This is a follow up to staff's memo dated September 16, 1982 requesting
financial assistance to attend the 1982 National Recreation and Park
Association Conference. The City Council indicated at that time that
they would not have the financial means to underwrite my personal
attendance at the conference. Staff understands and totally concurs
with this position but I have personally decided to attend the confer-
ence at my own expense. The question that staff is raising at this time
is regarding the feasibility of granting time off with pay for attendance
at the conference. The conference begins on Sunday, October 24 and con-
cludes on Wednesday, October 27 so the request would be three days off
with pay for Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday, October 25 through October 27.
Should the Council determine that this would not be within their current
policies, staff would like to request vacation time for that period so that
I could attend the conference on my own personal time.
Should you have any questions regarding this issue, staff will be in attend-
ance at, Monday evenings meeting or feel free to contact myself directly
at extension 41.
DKA/slI
CANDIDATES FOR MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
NOVEMBER GENERAL ELECTION
1982
MAYOR
Jerry Blomberq
Duane W. McCarty
Earl E. Smith
i—. CITY COUNCIL
Donna Mae Bowman
Charlotte Forslund
Sue Nankner
Jerry Linke
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
CITY COUNCIL
1 Agenda Session
October 18, 1982
7:00 p.m.
1. Discussion with Evan Green, MnDOT, regarding Pleasantview Drive/
Ilighway 10 signalization.
2. Consideration of staff memorandum regarding the feasibility
of using volunteers to man the warming house at Groveland Park.
3. Consideraticn of Ordinance No. 320, amending Chapter 26.
4. Consideration of staff memorandum regarding the New Brighton
Trunk Sewer Acquisition.
5. Consideration of amendment to Municipal Code Chapter 107 to
include Raffles and Gambling Devices.
6. Consideration of Third Draft of 1983 Water and Sewer Utility
Budgets and staff memorandum on Utility Maintenance and
Reconstruction Funding.
7. Discussion of additional manpower in the Public Works Maintenance
Department.
8. Consideration of staff recommendation regarding "no parking"
signs on Edgewood.
9. Discussion of implementing the provisions of Chapter 48, Wetlands
Ordinance.
A) Invitation to meet with impacted property owners.
B) October 14, 1982 letter from John Miller.
C) October 14, 1982 telephone call from Art
of Dynamic Designers.
D) October 12, 1982 letter from Bruce Malkerson
•
MEMO TO: Mounds View City Council
FROM: Bruce K. Anderson, Director
Parks, Recreation and Forestry
DATE: October 14, 1982
RE: Volunteer coordination of winter warming house
As ,you are aware, the Groveland Park neighborhood has been meeting on a regular
basis to develop and establish fund raising plans for Groveland Park. The
latest that they have been discussing is the feasibility of volunteering as
winter warming house attendents at Groveland Park and having the city in
turn donate the money they would have paid to "manning" the rink for park
development projects.
The hours that the warming house would be open at Groveland Park would be
Monday through Friday, 6:00 - 9:0o p.m.; Saturday, 1:00 - 9:00 p.m. and
Sunday, 1:0o - 9:00 p.m. During Christmas vacation and energy break, they
would be open from 1:00 - 9:00 p.m. also. Groveland Park is scheduled as
a part time warming house which would mean that there would be a total of
298 hours of supervision required at that site, based on the current rate of
$3.75/hour, we would be talking about $1,117.50 of monies that have been
budgeted for supervision at Groveland Park.
Staff supports this proposal for adult supervision from two basic perspectives:
1. We currently hire high school individuals to supervise the warming
house which has caused us problems in warming houses becoming a
place for kids to hang out due to not having proper adult super-
vision. Through this possible program, we would be having adult
supervision which we have not been able to have in the past at
our rink sites.
2. The city would not be expending any more money they already have
currently budgeted but yet they would be getting twice as much for
their money. The reasoning for this is that should you decide
not to go with using volunteers at the site, we would still have
to expend the $1,117.50, to hire a high school student. But by
using local neighborhood volunteers we could use that money for
park development projects at Groveland Park.
Staff would recommend that we at least attempt this type of proposal at Groveland
Park to determine if it can work and work out the particulars with the residents
regarding hours of supervision and who would be responsible for supervising the
site at what time. Although there will be some logistical problems that will
Memo to the City Council
October 14, 1982
Page two
need to be worked out, staff feels this is potentially a very innovative and
positive way to solve some of the problems we have had in the past with our
winter skating program.
8KA/sll —
10
•
MEMO TO: Mounds View City Council
FROM: Staff
DATE: June 16, 1982
RE: Warming (louse Program
Staff would recommend the following winter skating
program be implemented in the 1982-83 season.
PULL TIME WARMING HOUSES: Lambert Park
Woodcrest Park
Hillview Park
PART TIME WARMING HOUSES: Groveland Park
Greenfield Park
Pull time warming house hours: (Parks will be closed
Christmas Day and Now Years Day)
Opening date - December 17, 1982
Closing date - February 27, 1982
Monday - Thursdav 4 - 9:00 p.m.
Friday 4 - 10:00 p.m.
Saturday 9:00 a.m. - 10:00 p.m.
Sunday 1 - 9:00 P.M.
Christmas Vacation and Energy Week
Monday - Saturday 10:30 a.m. - 10:00 p.m.
Sunday 1 - 9:00 P.M.
Part time warming house hours:
Opening date
Closing date
Monday - Friday
Saturday
Sunday
December 17, 1982
February 19, 1982
6 - 9:00 p.m.
1 - 9:00 P.M.
1 - 9:00 P.M.
Christmas Vacation and Energy Week
Monday - Sunday 1 - 9:00 P.M.
Pay rate - $3.75/hour
Total hours:
Full time rinks - 526 hours/rink x 3 rinks ... 1,578 hours
Part time rinks - 298 hours/rink x 2 rinks ... 596 hours
Total skating hour ... 2,174 x $3.75/hour = $8,152.50
."N
d)P��II�IG ffe?fS
NOVEMBER 13, 1982 - RACQUET BALL PARTY AT NORTHTOWN RACQUET CLUB
This is opgn to everyone whether you'd just like to socialize, try playing for the
first time or play a few competitive games. We'll have a court set up for wally -
ball too!
Cost is $5.00/person -- Tickets will be available after the 1st of November.
DECEMBER 3 & 4, 1982 - CHRISTMAS BAZAAR AND COUNTRY STORE
We're planning a Christmas bazaar and country store. We'd
like to have a large variety of craft items, baked goods,
candy, canned goods, jelly, etc, Any help or participation
will be greatly appreciated! Block captains will have sign-
up lists for anyone willing to work a three hour shift on
either -Friday or Saturday. Crafts and non-perishable items
can be brought to block captains or to 8325 Fairchild on
Thursday or to Edgewood Community Center, Room 207 on Friday
morning.
FEBRUARY 112 1983 - DANCE AT BEL RAE
A dance is planned at the Be] Rae Ballroom, to be held on the llth of February.
More information regarding this even will be sent at a later date.
WINTER SKATING SEASON
During the ice skating season, we plan on supervising
the warming house with volunteer help. This will ben-
efit us in two ways: the allotted fund, for a paid
attendent, will go into our park fund and we'll have
the peace of mind knowing our children are being
supervised by neighborhood adults.
SPONSORED BY:
THE GROVELAND PARK ASSOCIATION
3
MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Clerk-Administra
DATE: October 6, 1982
SUBJECT: ORDINANCE NO. 320 - AMENDING THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF
MOUNDS VIEW BY AMENDING CHAPTER 26 ENTITLED "PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENTS"
At the time the special assessments were levied in the Silver
Lake Woods Subdivision for the public improvements installed by
the City in that Subdivision, Mayor McCarty raised a question
regarding the interest rate limits established by Chapter 26 of
the Municipal Code versus the statutory limitations and the
interest rate stipulated in our bond sale papers.
Discussions of this item with our bond counsel, as well as
City Attorney Meyers, revealed that Chapter 26 was written at
a time when the interest rates on special assessments were limited
to 8% and several changes over the past years in State statutes
have allowed cities to establish interest rates at or one percent
above the average interest at which the bonds were sold or the
interest rate established by an index computed by the Minnesota
Department of Revenues. It was the recommendation of City
Attorney Meyers in a letter dated September 22, 1982, a copy
attached, that Chapter 26.10, Subdivision 2, be amended to provide
that the interest rate on special assessments not exceed the
maximum permitted by law in order that our interest rate level
might be compatible with whatever statutory requirements exist.
With that in mind, staff has prepared Ordinance No. 320 for
your review and consideration containing the amendment recommended
by City Attorney Meyers.
DFP/pf
Attachment
RICHARD MEYERS, P
ATTORNEY AT LAW
11E0 VEN"a AVENUE
ST. PA -IL. MINNESOTA SS 111
011) aaa•EEu
A. '
1. • .V�r . �
1',1 rsi
r
September 22, 1982
Mr, Donald F. Pauley
City Administrator
City Hall
2401 Highway 10
Mounds View, Minnesota 55112
Re: Interest on Assessments
Dear Don:
In view of Join Kirby's letter of September 9, 1982, it appears
that regardless of any restrictions that we may have in our Code, the
rate of interest that can be charged on assessments is regulated pur-
suant to Minnesota Statutes. Therefore, our provision that the interf,
should not exceed eight per cent found in Chapter 26.10, Sub. 2, is
irrelevant. I suggest that that Code have a change which would be as
follows:
RM/ew
"All assessments shall bear interest at such rate as the
resolution determines, not exceeding the maximum permitted
by law, except that the rate may in any event equal the
average annual interest rate on bonds issued to finance
the improvement for which the assessments are levied."
This wording should clarify the situation
Yours very truly,, /
Richard Meyers
L �
ORDINANCE NO. 320
CITY OF MOUNDS VIE14
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE MUNICIPAL CODE
OF MOUNDS VIEW BY AMENDING CHAPTER 26,
ENTITLED "PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS"
The Council of the City of Mounds View does hereby ordain:
SECTION I. Chapter 26.10, Subdivision 2, Adoption; Brest,
is amended as follows:
Subdivision 2. Adoption; Interest. At such
meeting or at any adjournment thereof the Council
shall hear and pass upon all objections to the
proposed assessment, whether presented orally or
in writing. The Council may amend the proposed
assessment as to any parcel and by resolution
adopt the same as the special assessment against
the lands named in the assessment roll. Notice
of any adjournment of the hearing shall be adequate
if the minutes of the meeting so adjourned show
the time and place, when and where the hearing is
to be continued, or if three days notice thereof
1 be published in the newspaper. The assessment,
with accruing interest, shall be a lien upon all
private and public property included therein, from
the date of the resolution adopting the assessment,
concurrent with the general taxes, but the lien
shall not be enforceable against public property
as long as it is publicly owned, and during such
period the assessment shall be recoverable from
;:he owner of such property only in the manner and
to the extent provided in Chapter 26.16. Except
as provided below, all assessments shall be payable
in equal annual installments extending over such
period, not exceeding thirty years, as the
resolution determines, payable on the first Monday
in January in each year, but the number of install-
ments need not be uniform for all assessments
included in a single assessment roll if a uniform
criterion for determining the number of installments
is provided by the resolution. The first install-
ment of each assessment shall be includ(M in the
first tax rolls completed after its adoption and
shall be payable in the same year as the taxes
ORDINANCE NO. 320
Page Two
contained therein; except that the payment of
the first installment of any assessment levied
upon unimproved property may be deferred until
a designated future year or until the platting
of the property or the construction of improve-
ments thereon, upon such terms and conditions and
based upon such standards and criteria as may be
provided by resolution of the Council. In any
event, every assessment, the payment of which is
so deferred, when it becomes payable, shall be
divided into a number of installments such that
the last installment thereof will be payable not
more than thirty years after the levy of the
assessment. All assessments shall bear interest at
such rate as the resolution determines, not
exceeding B-per-eent-per-annum the maximum permitted
by law, except that the rate may in any event equal
the average annual interest rate on bonds issued
to finance the improvement for which the assessments
are levied. To the first installment of each
assessment shall be added interest on the entire
assessment from a date specified in the resolution
levying the assessment, not earlier than the date
of the resolution, until December 31 of the year
in which the first installment is payable, and to
each subsequent installment shall be added interest
for one year on all unpaid installments; or,
alternatively, any assessment may be made payable
in equal annual installments including principal
and interest, each in the amount annually required
to pay the principal over such period with interest
at such rate as the resolution determines, not
exceeding the maximum period and rate specified
above. In the latter event, no prepayment shall
be accepted under. Subdivision 3 without payment
of all installments due to and including December 31
of the year of prepayment, together with the
original principal amount reduced only by the
amounts of principal included in such installments,
computed on an annual amortization basis. When
payment of an assessment is deferred, as authorized
in this subdivision, interest thereon for the
period of deferment may be made payable annually
at the same times as the principal installments
of the assessment would have been payable if not
deferred; or interest for this period may be added
to the principal amount of the assessment when it
7�
ORDINANCE NO. 320
Page Three
becomes payable; or, if so provided in the
resolution levying the assessment, interest
thereon to December 31 of the year before the
first installment is payable may be forgiven.
SECTION II. This ordinance shall take effect 30 days after
the date of its publication.
Read by the Council of the City of Mounds View on this
day of 1982.
Read and passed by
day of _
the Council of the City of Mounds View this
, 1982.
ATTEST:
Mayor
(SEAL) C erk-A ministrator
q?F1,t-
101,N MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Clerk -Administrator
DATE: October 8, 1982
SUBJECT: NEW BRIGI;TON TRUNK SEWER ACQUISITION
On August 25th Mayor McCarty and I met with New Brighton's Mayor
Harcus, City Manager Pornell, and Director of Public Works Proper
regarding Mounds View's opposition to the acquisition of. a
New Brighton trunk sewer by the MWCC.
As you may recall, the City of Mounds View has taken a very strong
position in opposition to this acquisition and has been in the
forefront of those cities voicing their opposition. On August 26,
1982 Resolution No. 1430, copy attached, was adopted which outlines
the City's basis for our opposition.
The Physical Development Committee of the Metropolitan Council agreed
at least in part to our opposition by directing the City of
New Brighton and the MWCC to negotiate a purchase price for the
trunk sewer line rather than following the formula outlined by
M.S. 473.511, Subdivision 4, copy attached. We have been advised
by the City of New Brighton that the MWCC has not entered into
negotiations with them as directed by the Physical Development
Committee. The basis for this lack of action by the MWCC is not
known, however, based on previous statements by representatives
of the MWCC, it would be reasonable to conclude that they have
not done so because they do not feel they have any legal basis
for determining the purchase price other than that outlined by
State statutes as a result of earlier court decisions on similar
cases.
During the August 25th meeting with the New Brighton officials
a report from Mr. Proper was referred to,which we received a copy
of several weeks later and is attached, making certain statements
about the benefits the City of Mounds View has received and is
receiving from the MWCC. At first it was staffs reaction that
it was necessary to disprove or discredit these statements in
order to be able to justify the position we have taken on the
New Brighton trunk sewer acquisition. Upon thoughtful considera-
tion of the situation, however, staff has come to realize that
the bottom line issue is not the advisability of, the acquisition,
as it is an acknowledged fact that it is the most economical and
engineeringly sound option for Arden Hills. The issue ultimately
boils down to the question of whether or not the formula established
by the Legislature for the acquisition of existing facilities,
M.S. 473.511, Subdivision 4, is equitable and, if it is not, when
do we finally say STOP and attempt to seek changes in the formula.
-2-
Basically, the formula for computing the current value of
'
facilities is as follows. The total cost for construction
Of the facilities, .including engineering, legal, and adminis-
trative costs, less any part of it paid from Federal or State
funds, and less the principle amount of any then outstanding
bonds which were issued to finance this construction, is
multiplied by a factor equal to a current cost index divided
by the same cost index at the time of construction to determine
the replacement costs for these facilities. This replacement
cost is then depreciated by 1.25% per annum to determine the
current value for the facility. Attached is a sheet outlining
those computations and the annual current value credit over a
30 year period. The current value credit proposed to be given
to the City of New Brighton on an annual basis is $120,663.69
which appears to be a 15 year schedule rather than the 30 year
schedule listed on the attached sheet.
Unfortunately, the time that we chose to say STOP came when the
City of New Brighton proposal was presented but if not New Brighton
it would have been some other city that ultimately would be the
one to be the catalyst for this change.
It would be foolish for us not to recognize that we, along with
a great many other cities, have benefited from this formula in
the past but that does not justify the continuing use of the r'
formula, which was either poorly structured from the very
beginning or has become inequitable over the years. The question
staff now places before the Mounds View City Council is, "Have
we chosen the right or the best battleground for this issue?".
If it is the right and best battleground, then we should continue
our fight and carry it beyond the present level to the State
Legislature. If it is not, then we should drop our opposition
to the New Brighton acquisition and determine when and where we
wish to again raise this issue for discussion.
Your direction in this matter would be appreciated.
DPP/pf
Attachments
Id
RESOLUTION NO. 1430
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION OPPOSING ACQUISITION AND
EXTENSION OF NEW BRIGHTON TRUNK SEWER
WHEREAS, the City of Arden Hills has determined that the
trunk sanitary sewer in District W is inadequate due to sewage
flows from District NC; and
WHEREAS, the City of Arden Hills has determined that the
most cost efficient and engineeringly effective method for the
alleviating of the identified problem is to divert the sewage
flows from District NC into a Trunk Sewer owned and operated by
the City of New Brighton; and
WHEREAS, the City of Arden Hills has requested the Metro-
politan Waste Control Commission designate the New Brighton
trunk sewer as a metropolitan interceptor, acquire the trunk sewer
from the City of New Brighton, and extend said sewer to allow
connection with the Arden Hills sewer system; and
WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission has
given support to the request of the City of Arden Hills; and
WHEREAS, the designation of New Brighton's trunk, sewer as
a metropolitan interceptor and its subsequent acquisition and
extension will significantly affect the communities of Sewer
Service Area No. 2 of which Mounds View is a member; and
WHEREAS, the Mounds View City Council feels that the
acquisition and extension of New Brighton's trunk sewer, as
proposed by the City of Arden Hills, would not benefit Sewer
Service Area No. 2 and should not be financially supported by
Sewer Service Area No. 2 system users.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Mounds View strongly opposes the proposed Metropolitan
Waste Control Commission acquisition and extension of New Brighton's
trunk sewer to serve Arden Hills for the following reasons:
1. The proposed acquisition would excessively benefit
the CiLy of New BiiyhLun as the Value Credit of
$1,134,526.31 proposed to be given to New Brighton
by the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission exneds
the net cost to the City for originally constructing
the line ($862,311.69) before the remaining outstanding
bonds ($491,492.00), which will be assumed by the
Metropolitan Waste Control Commission, are deducted.
Resolution No. 1430
Page 2
2. The proposed extension will benefit users in only a
small portion of Arden Hills as the Metropolitan
Waste Control Commission does not plan to extend
this line any further.
3. The area in Arden Hills to be served, if the project
is approved, is presently in Service Area No. 1 which
has not contributed to the cost of the interceptor
system in Service Area No. 2 which they would be using.
4. All of the sewer users in Service Area No. 2 will
contribute to the acquisition and extension of the
New Brighton trunk sewer even though they will reap
no direct or indirect benefit from said acquisition
and extension.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City
of Mounds View encourages the cities of New Brighton and Arden Hills
to enter into a Joint Powers Agreement whereby the City of Arden
Hills compensates the City of New Brighton for use of the trunk
sewer and that the City of Arden Hills pays for all costs related
to the extension of the trunk sewer, thus, eliminating the need for
the participation of the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission and
the sewer users of Sewer Service Area No. 2.
1
Adopted this 26th day of April, 1982.
ATTEST:
Mayor
(SEAL)
1
is
7741 h1i•:1'ROPOi,lTkN COVE:RNMENT471,511
History: 1975 t• 0 s 79; 1976 c I66 s 7
473.5II SI;11'1, SERVICE'fVNI'"PION.
..+� Subdivision I. Omy or commission; nctluixition of existing facilities; new
facilities. At any little after January I, 1970 the waste control commission shall
assume ownership of all existing interceptors and Ircatment works which will he
needed to implement the cnulcil•s confprehensive plan for the collection, Ireat-
I fen[, and disposal of sewage in file uw•uopulilan toes, in the nnnmer and Sul).jcct to the cunditionx prescribed in subdivision+ 2 ;Intl 4. told Shall thereafter
acyuile. consuuet, cqugs, operle and m,linlain all addihomll intercrpmis and
Ircautivul works which will he needed lot such pmpuse. l'he eounlissiull shall
;Issunn• tiwucrship of all Irealmem works owned by ;1 focal government unit if
tiny part of such rcatmenl work+ %%ill he needed for such purpose.
Subd. 2. Method of acqui.silinn; existing debt. The commission, wish the
approval of the council. map rrglme ally local guvetiuoenl Imil lit transfer to the
t•onlftliv,ititl, all of its lie-ll. file and intro'+I in ;ntv inlrn'rplus or oeahucnl
sculks and all neccsuuy appurtenances Ihelelo owned by Such IUe;II guveronlenl
unit which will be needed lot the purpose slated in sulildivisiun I. Appropriate
inshtlnlcnls of aun'evaoee tin all such pnqurly shall be execlllcd and delivered
In the canmlission by the pt'll" tillirers of call turd govcromem unil con-
cerned All persons regularly cngloynl by a local gnn•nm VIII unit Ill tiperalc
and maintain any It- alincnt walk+ so Iraslerrvil to file conuuis+ion, tin life Jane
till w•hith the transfer hecnmes vilcctne, shall be ellgsloyvo+ of the commission,
in the %ante ucumer ;md with the sank tiptions and rights as are reserved In
employees of saniuov dimmi% ;oaf joint htiards under subdivision J. The
coin -mission. upon assuuling ownership of ally such inlcncpuos or licalmenf works,
shall become ohligaled to pay Iti well 1ot•:11 gticenunenl unit anuuons Sufficient
• to pay when title all remaining principal of and mteresl till hands issued by such
f local gtivcnunenl unit tin file acquisition or benermcal of the inlercepine; or
i lreanncnl winks taken liver. Such anmuntx nrq he offscl ag;unsl any amount !O
he paid Ill life commission by file local govcrnlnll( ullil as 473.517. provided in section
Subd. J, Existing sanitary dislriels anti joint sewer hoards. Effective .lanu-
ary I. 1971. the collio llc cxiwilve ill lilt- Minncapulis 4 VaIll S;ulifmv OI.s-
Ind. life Nunn Suborlmul S;mil;,:y Scurf I)isflicl, ;Ill,, any joint ho;oll created
by agreetucnt among lord guvernnn•nl units plltsll:lit lit section 471.59, to pro-
f vide interceptors and n'eatnlenl winks lot such local gavernnlcnl units, shall Icr-
e nlinale. All persons regularly employe l by such saniuoy districts ;old joint
e hoards tin HIM dale or till any earlier dale tin which the waste control conmlis-
sion purstcutf to subdivisions I ;'I'll 2 Msunles ownership and control of ;lily
illlcrecluors tit tr•II1111etII w'olks ow-ocl of III)CMial lly %licit xatlil;ll'1• Ilixllietx;Illd
f joint boards. Shall be engloyees of the Commission, and play ;it their option
1 became ntenlhers of the Minnesula Male retirement sysleni or may cominue as
t nnennberS of ;I public retirement association under clwplcr 472A or ;lily other
I;nv. to which they hcltlugcti hehoe such dale, ;old shall retain all pension rights
r J which Mley may have under sllcll Lnler Ines, and all olher rights to which They
are emitted by contract or law•. Tradesmen cngloyed by life metropolitan waste
s control commission will, bade union pension coverage pursuant it) a collective
bargaining agreement whit elected cxclttsitin front coverage purse oll to section
473.512 or who are first cntpltiycd ;Ifler buy 1, 1977 shall not he covered by the
y lifinnesom stale retirement system. ']'lie w•asle control rnnmission shall make
r the employer's contributions ill pension funds ul its cnlpluvees. Such culpinvees
y shall perform mac!; dctics , s m,n ill prcserlhCd by life commission. All funds of
such sanitary dislricls and joiul -hoards then till hand, and all xubsequcnl cullce-
Iions of taxes, special assessments or service charges levied or ingwsed by or for
47.1.511 (;OVItIINNIFN"I77d2
such Nallilal) diwicls 411 joint boauh Shall he umrstetred to the waste control
nnnnlimloll. The Iocal gowcnuucnl mob nlhcrwuc entitled Ili such cash, taxes,
asseWRA111s III incise rh.ulg•s shall he rlcdiled wish such anunuts, and such
cicdlls ,hall he ullsel aganlsl ;lily nounuas ail he paid by them to the waste con
loll vouunissiun as plodded itsscclian •171,517. Ills w•asle control commission /
shall succeed to and become vested with all right, title and interest in and to any
l ogn•I lt•. Ic;l Ile pclsonal, owned o operued by such solitary districts and joint
hoards; and print to that dale the proper ol'liccrs of such sanitary districts and
joint boards shill cscculc and dchvcl Ili the board all dwells, conveyances, bills
of %:dc. and ildn•1 doruna•nts ill inslnuuenls o•grlin•d o vesl in the commission
Ipon1 ;uul m:ukcWhle title lit all such will ill pelsuml pnglelly. The waste con-
sul cooloo .ion shall brrana• silly;atrll in p:lv ill assomc :III hooded sir sillier
drhl and coolracl obligalians inclosed by such sanitary districts and joint hoards,
u1 ulrunrd by lilt -al I!oscnuurul units lilt the arlplisiliou sir bcuclntcol ill' ally
hnleox•pprrs sit he:tnrrni caulks owned sir operated by such sanil ry districts or
j11uu bo.ud.
Solid. •1. Current value of esisling facililies. Whelh fhe commission assumes
the ownership of any nisling iulcrevilhus or treatment winks as provided in
subdivision 2 sir 3, Ile local guvcrnnm•ol unit or units which paid part or all of
the cost of such facility, directly sir posoant to contracts for reimbursement of
costs, shall he enlilled to receive a credit against anio a is it) he allorllcd to
them under section 473.517, which may he spread liver such period nil exceed-
ing .111 ve:us as I111• runuuiw loll shall dclruuinc. and ;sit additional credit equal to
inleresl an the unused credit b iallve from lime it, thoo at the rate of flint per-
crnl peI aummll. Ilw auuout ill such cn•dil shall equal the ctulcnl value of the
Lu•ility congnued he Ile vonunission in she nmolln•1 provided in this subdivision
;it she luuc the couumswnl acquocs it. 'Ihr uligi nl rust of a facility shllll be
rringnsicd its Ihr toed scoot casts It cousnucling it, inchnling engineering, legal,
and otlnunsuator costs. Ic%% any pail sit it paid Irum federal or slate funds and
Icss tn• principal :uwnml of ao Own amstanding bomb which were issuer) to
lionnce Its consullcuon. I he original cuss shall be nnlliplied by a factor equal to
a i1111vIll cast 1100% doiilrll llv Ili• %alllw com ilhdrX :d the little sit construction,
u1 determine rt•pkrcnnot cuss. The eoa indices used stall he the Engineering
News Record ('unsoucliou fuse Indices tin facilities or palls Ihelcur completed
bviote 14311, and the I honed Slates Public I Icallh Service Federal Water Pollu-
n1111 t'umnd \'alines im Scsvcl and'I'leanncmt l9mll ('ilnslrlcsioll, as applied to
Ial'IIIIWI sir palls Ihra•al runlplcted in a1 allet 111.111. The current value of the
facility shall he the Icphu•csilell, cuss dn+reciated by 2.511 percent per annum
III -Ill the date Id runsnurllilu sit lessened caw ks Mall 125 perv'vol per annurn
front the doe of ciluslructiun ill inlerccpsors: and decreased further by a reason -
;[tile allowulce fill obsolrsccmce it* the hoard delenmincs that Ile facility or any
part thereof will not he useful for brood purposes for at least the remaining
pctiud requirt•d to dcpneciatc• it hilly, assusiling no salvage value. The current
value of each such favility shall he credited In each local government unit in pro•
purlieu to fhe auuutml ill the conshuctiun cost paid by that unit. as determined
by the commission, liking into accounl reimbursements previously made under
contracts hehvccn Mug ill she local government units. The commission shall pre.
pare :sit ilcnhiied scdemrnl of the amount of credit each local government unit is
enlilled m ncceive under this subdivision, and the years and amounts of install.
ntclus ill plincipal and interest Ihereon. and shall cause it to be mailed sir deliv.
cred to the governing hotly or cads loyal government whit concerned. The
auhuunl of the annual cicdils of plincipal and iuscicsl made under this subdivi.
sion to each lord government unit shall he paid for its current coats of operation
;lilt[ maintenance ill fhe facilities fur which the credits were made. All credits
allowed under Ibis subdivision shall he itself In finance current costs allocated to
77•I3 M1IISI'It111'01,1'I'AN ti11ITUNMNN'1'47.51.1
the ducal governnleill unit hg ale cununiNNiot or Ior miler sewer costs. ;[fill the
credils sh;dl ntrl be nm%itleted :n puuecds sbum the sale ul' uumicipal pngleuy
u as 111 pcnuil (heir use for ether pmpuses.
tiubd. 5, Contracts I elwccn locl gmcrllnuml uuils. On Lmunry I. 1971, or
Off such earlier dale or dales :Is the eowlcil .Ilall by n•adulion 61elloioe, ;III
collimcls between of ;ml,nlg local guvcrunletll mlils requirine paynlellh ba y
ducal gnvrnum•m Inlil III any uthrl lurid rusruunt-lll unll, htl the use nl a 1115•
pusdl system. ur ;Is nuubutseln'm ul Calillal culls of a diNposol Nvslt-nl. are ter-
nlinahvl.
Ilfslory: 1975rOsNo; 1v77r1d4s.I
473.512 I'I+,NSION COVERAGE. EXCLUSION FOR CERTAIN LABOR SII
Subdivision I. A uadesrltatl englovell Ily the uu 111110ilan wade control
conuuissilm un a pernrmcnt basis Willi u;lde union pension plml coverage pursu-
m11 In a t•ollt•Clive bmgailling agreemew shall be czcluded buIII coverage by the
Minnesula slate relire'lilt•111 Ny51CI11 it Ilse Irult•511mi1 was IIINI emplllyetl (l11 or
alley ,little I. 1977 ur, it tilt- uadcsncln nos lost cmpluved pliul to June I, 1977,
11:15 eleCletl 111 be CXCIIIIICII frlltll t-llyt•Iallc hp lilt- MIIIIIc:sula stall• retirement
syslcul pursuanl it) suhlkision 1and has accepled a refund of conlributioils pur-
SWIM In subdivision 3.
suhd. N_. A lladcsutnl cnlidcl under snbdivisioll I In make an cleclinn of
nclusiun fluid lit-116,1I cm-Crlge by Ills' MIIIIiI'NUI;I NI;Ile Ivlilc ICItl NyMcIll Ilmy
slake the cleclion o1 ezchtsiun nu later Than AuCu9 I, 1977 on forms providnl
by the exeeuliec docchn ul the Aliunc>al;l site lei . let Will syNlcnl.'I'lie ciccliun
of exclusion Irunl covcrage shall be a one link ciccliun ilrecucahle while
employed in such ealmole alld shall haler Ietroacliv. applicaliun III the first lay
of membership in the hlinnesula NLIr rclircmcnl Nyskal.
Solid. 1. Upon elccling lit be Culnlcl hurl c❑e"Jave ;Is prut•idcl in subdi•
vision 2 and lu;lking ;I a;lhtl application. a r:ulrsntou •,Icdl be entitled lu a
relioul ill hulll Idle secunnlilled euglovet• and Ihr eugducrl t;lnllibuliuus maul.
pursuant 1u 1416, Sccliuo 352.04. subdivision 1, on bch;ll of
the Iratlesman plus inlelcNI a1 the r le of Ihn rce and ncdull' pelceal per :ununn
Compounded amlually tIPIII the lisle III Commencement of coverage, competed
In the first tiny of file nunnh in which 'Ilerefund is processed and xirdl be based
nn fiscal year haLuncs. 'file application for the rcftml may he male %vilhuut the
wailing period provid.d fur in Section 152 22, subdi ivision . No repayment (if it
refund nlatle under this section shall he pernlilled,
History: 1977 r 16 N d
473.511 KIIINICIPAI. PLANS AND I'ROGRAlliti.
As soon as praclicablC afler the a11011611 of the first policy plan by the
culmcil as provided in section 473.146. and hehlre undertaking the construction
of Mly extensions or additions a1 its disposal system fit the suhalanlial ;dlcr;Ilinn
or improvenlrnt of its exisling disposal syNICnl, cacti local governmenl unit shall
adopt a similar policy plan for the coileclion. Irealmenl anti disposal of sewage
for Whiell the local gmvennnem unit is responsible, aumfi:1111ed will the coon•
cil's pin, and nlay reviNe the %tone ;Is ;dlen as it It•CI115 necesN;Iry. Ii;Ich such
piau shall be suhulilled forthwith la the w:lsle tvnlrol cnnmlissioo Cur review
;Sell shall he sobjecl Ill lilt- appnlcal of tilt cummnisNiun :Is uI Ihuse fealmcs
affecting the coutnissiods responsihiditics :Is ICICIIIlinell by the commission.
Any such features disapproved by the cununissiun shall be nunlificd in accord-
ance Willi Zile conullissioli s rccomuunlatbuz• No consllmctiun of new sewers or
alter disposal facililies. ;nul nu stdlNlMlial adlcralim or improvcnlcnl of any
r
June 30, 19r£
TO ,lames W for nell, City Mar,aoer
(00INFhCN Leslie J. Proper, Director of Public Works l�G
SUBJECT: Acquisition Of New Brighton Trunk Sewer By M.W.C.C.
The City of Mounds View has taken a strong position against the
proposed acquisitian of our 42 inch trunk: sewer by M.A'.C.C. The
basis cf their arcu:...:cpt is that the benefit is more of a local
than regional nature. This strikes me as very unfair considering
the M.W.C.C. facilities presently existing in the City of Mounds
View.
The M.W.C.C. owns and operates a major lift station on County Road
"H" near Edgewood Jr. High School. The station and double 24 inch
forcemain sewer are shown on the attached map. The lift station
serves only the City of Mounds View yet the annual operation and
maintenance is paid by the M.W.C.C. or in fact, all the Cities
Within the service area.
The annual cost for electric power for this station is $6,700 alone.
A conservative estimate of labor and materials would be an additional
S4,000 per year. A conservative estimate for replacement of the
station after a 50 year expected life would be in the neighborhood
—of S501000 to $100,000.
.pproximately 2 miles of 66 inch M.W.C.c. interceptor sewer cross
diagonally through the center of the City of Hounds View. This
interceptor is also shown on the attached map in bold block. This
interceptor doubles as a trunk sewer and is of considerable benefit
to Mounds View. The existance of this interceptor enabled Mounds
View to recently abandon one of its existing City lift stations by
diverting directly into the M.W.C.C. facility. The diversion
necessitated the installation of an addition metering station by
the M.W.C.C. at a cost of $30,000. The cost of the metering station
was paid for by M.W.C.C. although the sole beneficiary was the City
of Mounds View by eliminating the cost and nuisance of a lift station.
Our trunk sewer on the other hand is of regional benefit under the
plan to serve Arden Hills in that it serves a major portion of 2
Cities, It will meet the criteria of a Metro Interceptor. The City
staff of Mounds View have argued more forcefully against this acquisi-
tion of our trunk sewer than any of the 16 Cities in the service area
even though it only represents a 1.6 percent increase in their sewer
bill, (about $5,200 per year). It is true that the City of -New
Brighton would receive a $120,000 annual credit on our sewer bill,
but this only represents a modest interest charge (about 4%) on
money expended.
1 hope there is an opportunity to get I•;ounds View to moderate their
',ition prior to ISetro Council consideration of the acquisition
our trunk sewer this Fall.
' I t:OU''a1'tE1�'�i�` •` E.0
i I I r• i f Ii1t �'C. f:. y
�._��. _ $HGREVIEW
�;�'f"^mil. ��,.._. _ I�.i.+�J _-...._.,. ---- l �•�,1: ..��,
;:; •c I / ARDEN HILLS
, y _. 71•. �A�j
' !• NEW
ti t BRIGHTON !•
•� , ... L_{.0 ..r .i 1AI
. al
A`
11 i z_•._'` ."...[ ..: - i. Yr•_•_ `ti I•.1.. r..0 rr• L,
i i l ram' .0 '1 I �% ? `4 �'a \(1F l;: •"•.^ ::,_j' IlI-
�'; I ` := • �;11 •�1T1; � I'; I . _ , (::�.� �_- ... _,. �, � 3 � . I ° �-; '�• .ram: �"•�•-�j ..
•4,(•.D�
j 1 yi(.I�' i 'I sl. 4� "• l itj... J', -ice ' • �"a �:I �.!
.\ .i1 �: / f /�•
1 -.11 , Lei l •. I I :• . !.. �
TMPI
::T,D_ EVIL Lk:
P�
CITY OF NEW BRIGHTON - TRUNK SEWER ACQUISITION REQUEST
E
This trunk sewer consists of 14,400 feet of 42-inch RCP sanitary sewer
begining at its connection with Metro Interceptor 4-NS-523 at Stinson
Boulevard and County Road H and extending to a manhole located north-
west of the intersection of Interstate 694 and the Minnesota Transfer
Railway right-of-way.
Total Construction Costs incurred by New Brighton $1,190,342.69
Less Federal Grant to New Brighton 328,031.00
Net Cost to City $ 862,311.69
Less Outstanding Bonds (to be assumed by the MWCC) 491,492.00
Net Equity (for current value credit determination) $ 370,819.69
Present Worth Calculation; (As prescribed in Section 473C.05
subdivision 4 of the Metropolitan
Waste Control Commission Act)
Equity
$ 370,819.69
Multiplied by the ENR index
factor of
1.186
to arrive at an appreciated
worth for
1971 of
439,792.15
Multiplied by the EPA index
factor of
3.175
to arrive at an appreciated
worth for
1983 of
1,396,340.08
Less Depreciation for 15 years
@ 1.25% per year
261,813.77
Net Current Value Credit
$1,134,526.31
Annual Current Value Credit: (Based on 30 annual
payments at 404 interest) $ 65,610.00
LWI IMPALI UN
4WLA SERVICE CHARGES
COMMUNITIES IN
SEWER SERVICE AREA /2
ACQUISITION OF '
9RIGHTON INTERCEPTOR
COMMUNITY
CURRENT TOTAL
1902 PAYMENTS
COST IMPACT ACQUISITION
OF NEW BRIGHTON INTCP.
Arden Hills
Blaine
i 311,016.82
$ 4,631.44
Brooklyn Park
590,243.50
837,024.94
9,349.12
Circle Pines
61,569.28
17,082.47
Coon Rapids
617,624.85
1,095.09
Fridley
843,350.86
11,772.79
Andover
76,393.70
5,523.38
Lexington
23,061.65
1,004.10
Maple Grove
5069586.73
461.65
Moundsview
327,218.33
7,733.34
New Brighton
Osseo
492,757.61
5,136.22
(120,663.69)
Shoreview
101A 7'40
1,373.22
Spring Lake Park
�" " "'°"
139,017.19
1,341.78
Lino Lakes
15,768.22
2,285.44
Centerville
19,689.68
265.38
323.42
Totals
$5 257,915.64
$(51,284.85)
MEMO TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNC L \
FROM: Clerk-Administrato J
DATE: October 13, 1982
SUBJECT: AMENDMENT TO MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 107
Attached please find the proposed amended Chapter 107 of the
Municipal Code which would include the regulation of raffles and
gambling devices, along with bingo games already regulated under
that Chapter, as referred to in my Administrative Newsletter dated
October 11, 1982.
City Attorney Meyers has reviewed this ordinance and finds it
acceptable for adoption by the City.
The only issue to be raised before the Council regarding the
adoption of this amendment would be a determination as to whether
or not it is the desire of the Council to permit the conduct of
raffles and the use of gambling devices by religious, charitable,
fraternal, or other non-profit organizations in the City of Mounds
View. It is my understanding that it has been the practice of
organizations of this type in the City of Mounds View to conduct
Casino nights in the past, however, the Council may wish to give
consideration to whether or not they wish this practice to be
continued in the future. If it is your desire to permit this
practice, the adoption of this ordinance would allow us to license
these activities as authorized by state law.
DFP/pf
Attachment
11
CHAPTER 107
BINGO, RAFFLES, AND GAMBLING DEVICES
107.01 Provisions of State Law Adopted. The provisions of
Minnesota Statutes, Section 349.11 through 349. re atin to t
game of bingo and Section 349.26 relatingto paddlewheels, tipbo
pull tabs or ticket jars and lotteries are adopted and made a pa.
of this chapter as if set out in full. In addition the regulati
of this chapter shall apply to the conduct of bingo and ra les
the use of such gambling devices within the c,tv_
1e7-e1 107.02 Permit Required. The game of "bingo", raffles,
and the use of gambling devices, as hereinafter defined, is hereby
declared illegal unless the permit hereinafter provided for is first
obtained and all requirements hereinafter specified are fully
complied with.
109702 107.03 Definitions. Per-t•he-pnrpeses-e€-this-ehapter
the-game-ub}ngeu-4s-de€#ned-as The following words and terms wherever
they occur in this chapter shall be defined as follows:
(1) Bingo - a popular modern variation of "Keno" or "Lotto",
where each player has a card or board containing five horizontal
rows all but the central one containing five figures, the
central row having four figures with the word "free" marked in
the center thereof; any combination of five in a row whether
horizontal, vertical or otherwise when completed by a player
constitutes "bingo", and the central row either horizontal,
vertical, or otherwise constitutes "bingo" when its four
numbers are announced and covered. A wheel or other mechanical
device may be used by any person conducting the game of "bingo",
and any such person may award either money or merchandise to any
player or players first completing any combination entitling
such player or players to call "bingo".
([) Gambling Devices - Those gambling devices known as paddle-
wheels, tieif
boards, pull -tabs (or ticket )ars) or apparatus use
(3) Paddlewheel - A wheel marked off into sections con
one or more numbers and which, after being turned or sp
uses a pointer or marker to indicate winning chances. ances.
out of every set of pull -tabs
izewinners.
orator for th
cket• or a car
ssibly obtain
1 Raffle - A
Ti
view the numbers or
ze wi
at a
107.03
ticket jars) '
andom as
tion to an
ed or banded
- A board placed or other device
s square, marked off in a grid or
Finn rnntainc a hidden number or
ar
or
at
164703 107.04 Application. Any religious, charitable,
fraternal or other association not organized for pecuniary profit,
which has been in existence for at least three years, has at least
15 active members, and duly existing under the laws of the State
of Minnesota, desiring to conduct said -game -and -the -playing -thereof
a bingo game or raffle or use gambling devices shall make application
for a permit the
re€er to the Council.
10y704 107.05 Application Form. The application herein
provided for shshhaIT-be in the form specified by the Clerk-Administrat
104:05 107.06 Verification. The application shall be verified
by a duly authorized officer of the association and also by the
person charged by the association with conducting and supervising
said game; and both such applicants shall be responsible for the
proper conduct and operation of the game and for compliance with the
provisions of all pertinent statutes, ordinances and regulations
of any governmental agency pertaining to the conduct of playing of
said game and the premises upon which the said game is conducted.
104:06 107.07 Permit Fees. The application shall be submitted
together with the permit fees established by resolution of the City
Council for all dates of operation of proposed "bingo" games for a
period of one year to the Clerk -Administrator for presentation to
the Council.
104704 107.08 Information Required. The application shall
state the date or dates and the hours thereof for which permission
to play the game is requested, and the applicant association shall
not conduct said game at any other time than the hours and date
or dates specified in the application.
407TOB 107.09 Council Action. After presentation of the
application and the fees as herein provided, the Council shall,
in its discretion, either grant or deny the same. 0
107.10
197709 107.10 Restrictions. No permit shall be issued
allowing the -game a bingo game o_ r_ ramie to be conducted or gambling
devices used by the applicant association more than one day a week
En the same premises or for a longer period than four consecutive
hours on any one day within a period of more than one year from
the date the permit is issued.
197716 107.11 Refunds. After an application has been granted,
no refund of the fees hereunder taxed shall be made.
107-11 107.12 Sole Purpose. No such association shall rent,
y an
lease, or occupy property for the sole purpose of conducting
such game-er bingo game(s) or raffle or using gambling devices.
107712 107.13 Persons Conducti.� Only members of the
applicant association shall be permitted to conduct the game bi_ njo
games or raffle or use gamblin devices and no person shall be paid
or given any remuneration for conducting such game bingo game or
raffle or using ambling devices.
104713 107.14 Change of Officers. If, subsequent to the
issuance of the permit there shall be a change of officers of the
association or of the manager of the game(s), the license conferred
by the permit shall be void until such change or changes shall have
been brought to the attention of, and approved by, the Clerk
Administrator.
10?r14 107.15 Free Lunches. No free lunches, food or
merchandise shall be offered or given, nor shall other inducements
for game participation be made by anyone.
107:15 107.16 Revocation. No permittee shall have a vested
right in any permit hereto, and such permit may be revoked in the
event the permittee shall violate or cause to be violated any of
the provisions of this chapter, or of the statutes relating to
ubrngeu-games bingo and ambling devices, or of any state law,
ordinance, or regulation pertaining to the conduct of said game
or to the premises on which it shall be conducted, or in the event
the applicant shall be guilty of any misrepresentation in the
application.
107716 107.17 Proceeds. The proceeds arising from the
conducting of "bingo" games, raffles or operating gambling machines
shall not inure to the profit of any -3lv dual.
10:TP 107.10 Books and Inspection. The permittee association
shall at all Filmes proper books and records showing the gross
receipts from the operation of the said games, raffles or machines
and the net receipts thereof to the permittee association, and all
107.18
other pertinent matters related to the proceeds of and distribution
of receipts frem-said-game; and the permittee shall at all reasonabl
times permit access by the Council and police officers to all such
books and records which shall be kept by the officers of the permittee
for a period of at least one year. In the event of an audit the
permittee shall pay the reasonable expenses of such audit based on
the minimum per diem rates charged by a public accountant or certified
public accountant.
104718 107.19 Penalty. Any person, firm, corporation, or
association guilty of any misrepresentation in an application for a
ubingeu permit or otherwise violating or causing to be violated any
provision of this chapter shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. (23, 188)
s
0
TO: Mayor & Council
FROM: Finance Director -Treasurer Brager
DATE: OcLobcr 13, 1902
RE: PROPOSED 1983 WATER & SEWER UTILITY BUDGETS
WATER FUND
Submitted for your consideration are the tnird drafts of
the Water & Sewer Utility budgets. Proposed changes and an ex-
planation of them follows:
The proposed Water Administration budget was reduced by
$2,433 as a result of budgeting for the Director of Public Works/
Community Development position as a consultant on a 1/2 time basis
rather than 3/4 time as an employee. Changes to individual accounts
are:
Account
Second
Third
Change
Draft
Draft
4010
Salaries
15,207
8,092
- 7,115
4030
Pensions
1,856
987
- 869
4040
Group Insurance
945
660
- 285
4050
Workman's Comp.
30
16
- 14
4303
Professional Services
4,836
10,686
+ 5,850
P/W Comm. Dev. Dir, on
a consulting basis 1/2
time
TOTAL - 2,133
Total proposed reductions in the Water Operations budget are
$21,456. The first change, deletion of 1/2 of a shared maintenance
man position, is a reduction of $15,028.
Account
Second
Third
Change
Draft
Draft
4010
Salaries
53,167
42,548
-10,619
4030
Pensions
6,593
5,303
- 1,290
4040
Group Insurance
3,30U
2,64^
- 660
4050
Workman's Comp.
3,897
3,133
- 764
4240
Uniforms
550
445
- 105
4160
Operating Supplies
8,327
7,537
- 790
4303
Professional Services
3,900
3,100
- 800
Most of the reduction is in the personnel services accounts.
Other reductions were for supplies and services which were requested
should the additional man be approved.
October 13, 1982
Page 2
When the 1/2 maintenance position was added, a request for
part-time seasonal help was dropped. The affected department head
now requests that that part-time position be put back into the budget
at a cost of an additional $4,000.
Account
4020 Temporary Salaries
Second Third Change
Draft Draft
0 4,000 + 4,000
Purchasing vehicle maintenance supplies in
bulk should result in a small savings. The
net change in the vehicle supplies account
is $28.
4122 Vehicle Maintenance 299 271 - 28
Supplies
The street supplies account was reduced by $1,500.
Staff felt that the request was too high in light
of past expenditures of $345.89 in 1980 and $1,333.64
in 1981.
4124 Supplies, Streets 2,947 1,447 - 1,500
A reduction of $2,500 is proposed for the utility
supplies account. Expenditures of the account were
$5,450.15 in 1980 and $5,038.28 in 1981. Expenditures
as of 8/31/82 are $3,339.77.
4125 Supplies, Utilities 8,434 5,934 - 2,500
Operating Supplies are proposed to be reduced by
$1,000. Staff feels that the requested amount is
too great in light of past expenditures of the account.
In 1980 expenditures were $4,166.21 and in 1981 they
were $4,256.89. As of 8/31/82 expenditures of the
account were $2,606.36.
4160 Operating Supplies 7,537 6,537 - 11000
Deletion of proposed Chemlawn fertilization and weed
treatment for Wells 5 & 6 is recommended. It is felt
that since no other property is so treated it might
result in a precedent which would prove to be too
expensive in the long run.
4511 Contractual - 3ldgs. 400 0 - 400
Gruds,
n
October 13, 1982
Page 3
Deletion of $5,000 from the Contractual Repairs account
for water main breaks is proposed as it is felt this is
a duplication since a contingency of $15,000 for breaks
is budgeted.
Account
4513 Contractual Repairs,
Utilities
Second Third Change
Draft Draft
18,000 13,000 - 5,000
Proposed reductions of the Water Administration budget by
$2,433 and of the Water Operations budget by $21,456 result in
total proposed reductions in the Water Fund budget of $23,889. The
total proposed 1983 Water Fund expenditure budget is $254,318.
Estimated revenues at current rates of $0.55/1,000 gallons of water
sold is $292,870. This results in an estimated net income of $38,552
for 1983.
SEWER FUND
The proposed Sewer Administration budget has been reduced by
$23,980. Of this amount $2,433 is the result mf budgeting for the
Director of Public Works/Community Development position as a consultant
on a 1/2 time basis rather than 3/4 time as an employee. Changes to
individual accounts are:
Account
Second
Third
Change
Draft
Draft
4010
Salaries
15,207
8,092
- 7,115
4030
Pensions
1,856
987
- 869
4040
Group Insurance
945
660
- 285
4050
Workman's Comp.
30
16
- 14
4303
Professional Services
4,836
10,686
+ 5,850
I recently spoke with Richard Berg, MWCC Comptroller, about
the City's 1983 sewerage treatment charges. Mr. Berg gave me a
figure of $354,754 and stated that at budget hearings they have had
there has been no talk of their budget increasing. Their final
budget hearing is scheduled for October 19, 1982. Mr. Berg anticipates
their budget will be finalized at that meeting. This new figure is a
decrease of $21,547 from our previous estimate.
Account Second Third Change
Draft Draft
4323 MWCC Charges 376,301 354,754-21,547
October 13, 1982
Page 4
Total proposed reductions in the Semawer Operations budget
are $58,988. Deletion of 1/4 of a shared intenance man position
is a reduction of $6,501. This leaves $51,955 in Personnel Cost
budgeted for two full time maintenance positions.
Account
Second
Third
Change
Draft
Draft
4010
Salaries
47,955
42,647
- 5,308
4030
Pensions
5,936
5,291
- 645
4040
Group Insurance
2,970
2,640
- 330
4050
Workman's Comp.
1,545
1,377
- 168
4240
Uniforms
584
534
- 50
When the request for the 1/4 maintenance man position was
added a request for part-time seasonal help was dropped. The affected
department head now requests that that part-time position be put back
into the budget at a cost of an additional $4,000.
Account Second Third Change
Draft Draft
4020 Temporary Salaries 0 4,000 + 4,000
Prior to consideration of propane conversion the
vehicle maintenance account was reduced by $17 due
to expected savings from bulk purchases of maintenance
supplies. Since propane conversion was approved $750
was added to this account for conversion of a pickup
truck. The net change to this account is an increase
of $733.
4122 vehicle Maintenance 172 905 + 733
Costs of conversion of the sewer jet rodder to propane
are estimated to increase the equipment maintenance
account by $1,725.
4123 Equipment Maintenance 3,063 4,788 + 1,725
Before propane conversion was considered, staff
reduced the amount requested for motor fuels to the
average usage of the department's vehicles for the
last two years plus 10%. This resulted in a savings
of $4,328. Estimated costs of propane compared to
gasoline for the units being converted result in a
further savings of $2,242,
October 13, 1982
Page 5
I
Account Second Third Change
Draft Draft
4170 Motor Fuels & 10,618 4,048 - 6,570
Lubricants
A front end alignment for the jet rodder truck which
was inadvertantly budgeted in the General Fund was
added to the Equipment Repairs account.
4513 Equipment Repairs 27 152 + 125
An allowance of $52,500 for sewer repairs resulting
from recommendations which may be forthcoming from
the Infiltration Inflow (I&I) Study was deleted from
the Construction account. Staff feels that it is
premature to budget for such major repairs in the
absence of the more thorough Sanitary Sewer Evaluation
Study (SSES) which normally follows an I & I Study and
addresses the needed repairs in specific problem areas
identified by the I & I Study.
Proposed reductions of the Sewer Administration budget by
$23,980 and of the Sewer Operations budget by $58,988 result in
total proposed reductions in the Sewer Fund budget of $82,968. The
total proposed 1983 Sewer Fund expenditure budget is $530,381.
Present sewer rates of $24.50 per REC per quarter would not
raise enough revenues to fund the presently proposed 1383 Sewer
Expenditure budget. At present rates, a net loss of $59,109 is
projected.
Revenues:
Usage Fees
464,G10
Connection Fees
500
Permits
450
Interest Income
5,000
Other Revenue
712
TOTAL REVENUES
471,272
Expenses:
Operations
482,131
Depreciation
19,600
Debt Service
13,650
Contingency
15,000
TOTAL EXPENSES
530,381
NET LOSS ( 59,109)
October 13, 1902
Page 6
Part of the reason for present rates not being adequate is
a loss of the Sewer Fund revenue base. Estimated sewer use charges
for commercial & industrial accounts is estimated to be $9,310 lower
than the -1982 estimate. This is due to a lower number of REC'S for
commercial/industrial accounts. Estimated 1983 REC'S are 95 REC'S
lower than 1982.
The other reason for present• rates not being adequate is
increases in costs of goods and services needed for operations. Total
city operating costs (excluding depreciation, debt retirement, and
contingency) are 10.42% higher than 1982 budgeted expenses. MWCC
sewerage treatment costs are 8.42€ above 1982 costs. SLaff has re-
viewed the Sewer Operations budget and made reductions in various
areas. At this point staff feels that the budget proposed provides
the minimum amount of maintenance necessary to properly maintain the
system.
Staff feels that in order to properly maintain thu system,
needed revenues must come from users in the form of an increase in
rates. An increase of $3.25 per REC per quarter (13.27%) would raise
an additional $61,641 in revenues resulting in an estimated net income
of $2,532.
Should you have any questions do not hesitate to contact me.
DB/ds
Enclosures: Budget printouts:
Water Administration
Water Operations
Sewer Administration
Sewer Operations
Utility Fund income Statements
cc:
Clerk -Administrator Pauley
Director of Public Works/Community Development Johnson
Director of Parks & Recreation Anderson
Chief of Police Grabowski
4
, ' I
1
i I 1
1
J1
HW I
U> I
Zo I
O ce I
On I
U IL 1
4 1
I
K 1
O 1
F 1
Q Vl I
KO goDDoo 00 000bgvb oob 0010
'j 1• 7 D v D O o O ma
o O O g D D b O o O O O q
M W • • • . • 1 1 r • r • r ♦ • . 1 HL N ha,Dn Op W0 on ID N N In in 10
Z L cP do -.0 14LA MM n�. oN H ID i0 hh I M
H O O In ID h NN 'D S M•D •i M M hh I N L U
OW m P o• • I
4fY „INN .D NN 1 P
N MM In
W 1
D: 1
7 1
F I
H F N 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 O p v O 0 a 0
a Z F o 0 0 0 0 o 0D Maio
Z W In r 1•••♦ 0000000 pDp
•♦ '� '� 0 0 0 l 0
W r W A In M 0
• • r • • • • • • ♦ • ♦ 1
x K O N mP Mo NM MA M O%D N M M D Ah I h
W 4 IW • • • N m 1 N h h I ,0
LL D: Ln ..I m • • • w w • 1
W .1 1i .f N N O N N 1 •1
M O i1 M M 10
m I
tn
P 1
11 1
1
I
'r o ID N'tb PP AOPOavIp o00 1 F J O in h N h A h o M m O D o I III
J 0 0 0 D Z • 1 1 1 1 1 n J cm 1
1„I 1 1 • 1• I r•• ••• 1• I r
CO L '0 r,in MM InDM h11 1 M
P Ln M M Mi. .+ .♦ N ..1 n P I S
W •r ,O • w w 1
O S N M
co
I
W 1
C9 I
O
D W o00000 00 a0000aa o0o obio
m N F •♦•••• r 1 • o 0 0 0010
0 W N o 0 VI A • r r•• 1 r•• r• I
P l0 11 11a AIn AA ID In Tko N m 00 I n
J HO h m10 11 1114 M oo t P
•. m n. • •• P v f0 N IA I S
P In N .-I 11 0 • • I
Z co co I 0
= 1
K 1
4 I
a 1
W -1 moldP in meo .Ino O
O H Q 0 0 J 0 0 O o p 0 0 I M
coO • •0 r N i1 •'I d 0N0, MOS 01 y 00 I h
• ♦ 1 • • • • r • • r • • • I O H m h h h o S A P O
14 1 'D �D h MM M.1 coN.•1 N Dq oo I nn Do 1 N
4 N, hM M h P
Z � 1 hMJ1 D e1 •i 00
O h' m M • •• w• 1
h
F PP NNIM
4 1 H
K I
F 1
N 1
H 1
2 0' N.,O 'Ppm yJ PM LM4 in OP pa0 00 1 N
O P F .i' m 14 eo co h o • • r • • • • ♦ • 1 1 • • I 1
4 11U J NM0 P hh M moN 1/ h oo I M
Q h W.I In NN 1ihhM P OO I co
W ,O h M H .-1 w t.
Nin I P
H N N I M
> I
N I I
O 1
Z 1
1
r � 1
1
W W M to V) W I
W N V) I
HW HH J FI
} J YD! FU JJ 40 H W Z I
N F• ]> U l> IL EL 9U (IfX x l
C.)7 Z LO LO Z W W 0 V) VI V) V) x V) i1 F W I =
a' H WWw X 0: K4 aV) W WVIF O
V) 4 FN 1 0
HW ♦ UW M 'J VIOW I H
w F U 7 .J 7 1' F O 7 1 F
�V)WNLUW atLJ oe CY.H J JF Z40 raH I F 2 K WW X ZHOZ n W 4 W ], x WZ ul •U ►W H.1 W WO 1 0
0 WHHO KZ NON 0 4U'HIO JQ 4r 04 VI 1L I H
V) ND'FHIL JO O: KK4Ma4K Ja WF 0! V) • I Z
W' 4a'In7 X0 ♦0W JW 01-2 WFF P. HKH 2 Z 0 1 H
.0 0JW G0ryy MF 4S OVIH JZZ •.70lLS QIA I r
�N j .JC?ILIKO W NH4 OI- D:OK H WO OCJ W 4 NKH I O
W N104Usa Jxr 1-0ma.a rwo WOL1 HI-r 14
Z J N U J O 1
�0 W� J 4 J. 4 J J 1 J
0 F� Oa.aOp p4 ia'14 OLM SC, VN4 F•M)n4 ♦oQ 14
A Hl M .1 j -A InS' N F :W 11 F' F• 0 0 M S m 0 F' N v; P F U P F, I F
a0I00 ';F•HO�� UZMi1M M•t9IMJ 4
JF0
1 UAylIA0 i(A 0F0�.11 OWS=I y 1,.=1a F
Jw
Hw
U>
Z O
7 IY
na
ua
a
a!
r
4 13
i13
- Z
Nw
Hr
2T
H O
r L!
Ow
4 K
U1
w
0'
7
F
H
O
z
W
a
w
M
m
P
H
ao00oo00
o aa00000
•..•
a 0 0
'r0 S M a,m 0 M 0
N.i 0LnN M M
a 0
O g O O O o O O
000a0000
A In 0 M 0 N N
n moPoP 3
.i 0 m to M to m
M .i SJ7M M N
,n n
N
1
2
4t%0
F
N m O.i �O .OoM
J
H
NO
1 A aJh aS to
e0L
n.D SAD .iMNN
(IN.i
o m .i N a%
.4,0
• • w
p
P N H N U1
.i N
oouooaouo
a.+onan,nu+a
.inT JMM H.1N
NNN jPln m.1 N
H ./N DM O
N
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 o a o 0 0
•] TO h Sh .OoM
.DPP SMN •iNA
NNN P }M mN.i
• w
.i N m m M 10
N
M Q`M JmA mNa
a m J A.i �D PU\S
¢�Om Mo.i NN.i
T .-iN NN S S NU1
m .D :n
.1 N i O
aommo0000000oo0
a0000000000000i
a e o a
noJ) oOOU)
Como
�eNIM
.i h n LA
O joP
M .i Nm
.iNMN
O O O a 0 0 0 g O o 0 0 0 0 0
o ooaooaa0000000
• • • • • • • . . . r • •
000.2 O-OO
00M.2 ONan ONOoM
Phh N •iM a OSO./
M .iN00 .iNmP
S Pnn o�Do 0 0.0 a.i 0•00
M o.ijooOAooPoj000
.D T S h •D M N o 0 H -0,4
•i S .n M N N .• 'D -1 o N P
.l SOP H N N NA
• • • •
i D J M
1 N
a m o ,-• O o o
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
O O a 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
W
W
0 0 0 o 0 :, O O
O
O O O O D O O O o
0
• .
N F
m W
• • • • • • •
.D h oNo to
•
O
• • • • • • . • •
a M N oJO 0.-11
• • • •
N AA.•
• • •
1110.i .0 NONP
CP LD
N PONN N
N
ON 0004.i T.0
O SIA In
0 10N OO NM
D SU1.tA
,ip
N Nm'DN N
M
hN .J MJ1� J Nm
N U1.i0
.NM
11
• • • • •
O MS N M
•
mN
1
PU\ S MN
Sn
h a
.ice
S
N
M
IJ
.i 4
m :3
P' F
.i U
4
00'm oM In J co to
J m O 0 IO M A In
.1 • • • • • • •
In J NO P N U)h
J a mN S.i P.I
M n In 111 h MLn 0
A .iM1 .iN .1
M' N
min oamP S Om
n1m�pNm,n n.i
N D•M M mU) In Am
MMNNmM
MMSMON.iMM
•1 N a M U1
.i
S M 4 o •D 0000P 000�0 N
o 'D ONa o'D M U10 J- It
J OO.Dn 00NNON.4
.i P S m MN AMU1
N m N N
M N
.J
M'N 00 J o0P
mIn0 0m.4 N NM
P PM J o000o In a A.i
N.ON oaa No'n OOq NJ
04
TU)Oa m aOh
in m P m.iN In N j
M
at
NJm P.i
N
T H j UN 0,0 M'Dm
SN b In a In S Om
.40
.0
.0 U)Mm S 0
0
.i.DP SN.O A Ma
J) 4+.010 U\U).i N OP
oN
Q
o jgOnN
O
.1.D4 MS.i mSN
.i OMN .i.i.i
M S N
a IA S A a
M
d
z
H
r
0.
H
a
U
ut
W
O
r
W
FI
H�
w
r
H
F Z
O VI
a 4Q 1-4JJa WOViO>
+ U Z U a
uua zw w
NW Wr <mp.0
waOf Qw trZ
U r 7UW
•i • • NJLJ
�VN,U Ln VIZ }W
wwxwzHor)z
W HHH O K J z
ViY FfYH IL WLL0
4 a4 VIZ) Yr VI
JW JZOKWa
J4>4WKnZW
w NCO VIa 0 =� a
z J
OO.i 00 0 =04
W H'.i N M. s In �D 1•
a 0 0 0 010 0 0 Q
wwJaIt 14.10.
'F
z
z
V 0
U N
7. r JI HOW
;y Z LU0 a'ZH
U ww0HL S1HJ
+ J r r r H J x a
N U IL WHr JFa
-DHHWJ4 0=
M0 :D,y•4W+JM
w J W O F r W j
H f0>W ADCL M +
J O J +
D, • . . w • • W VI
a VI Ln00VI V7 DVIJ
m U1W WWwwWr4
O H V H H H H M H
J J J JJ J.Y 0w
aiLas1LL iJLLW
aRn.aalL1••HF
J VI EA In A (pn 'A r. 7 T
4 J
N
N N" N N 00 0 4
w
W N N NN h J I.
.1 .1 .1, H .i .1 .i N O
t a ja�JaasaF
s,
W
> Z r
41 z w VI
V1 ji W W
J J �r VIU
4 Jl I •- O Z ��% bi
Z F • 0! W VI H >
01 W WU' T_r FK
HM J i aWHW
M Vf' 40 LLiHW J0
w N.w3 zW •i 0aH
UWH>c/)UU N OVI UFrA
H U. r F 4 H H a O LD W VI 0 4
> 0 4 H L•1 VIr H W O w • •F
aD:UU ao r.0 J
wa HHJU Z Z VIZ •M000U
Vi ZM4H HWHJ KKw4
Y •J H Y LL J F W Z 4 • H H N N
J W r O a 4 4 Z m H F • Q Q 4 r
Qx T. IUra c3Hr4 ZIL ILaM12
O F n J a K W W W Y W W W lU W 0
FO U'UzrJ n. T. r Y. tY W W'yU
U J
aM O.-IN U1 A M.i M.i H MS 04
Fo .-IN N N aS 000 ••.i.i.ir
OS�SJ;J.M1Sjj3aN1 t10•
u ,
U'a
1
z'0
I
0la
1
o.a
1
®
oa
1
a
�
4
1
o
I
F„,
1
4 (A
I
wo
coca
0000010
hZ
Coca
a 000
to
y W
. . . •
. • • • •
1 •
HS
OONN
0010
Zr
maNN
qa
110
H O
Ono"
q 0
1 o
OW
.f OITM
mN
10
A N
N
.4.4
I M
y
1
W
1
�
I
7
I
F
1
H
b• y
O i g 0 0
00000
1 0
q
Zf
0 a Q 0
oocoo
to
Z
W 0
•I • • •.
• • • • •
I
W
ZW
oiv N111
oa
I LO
a
1 F•0
q;aNN
oo
1"
X
4'O
N,M NM
o0
110
W
4 W
•• a
w w
i w
a4
r00EM
in
110
W
N
.• w•
1 .1
M
O
N
CO
I
I
y
1
=
000.O
0�coo
o
N
0
I f
J
j 'Z
•; • • •I
• • • • •
1
N'O
NI N'
o 0
1 A
Co
NI N
N P.
1 N
.1 O
• •
1 c
N
�
1
1
I
O
0
,O
O;Ooo
0 0 00 0
1
1 0
D
W
oiDoo
0000o
10
COW
of NN
IN
TKO
0 NN
14
J
1 .10
3, r01
I M)
Q
D
w' w w
1 •
H
m
SI
I
NN
h
L
x
4
a
I
I
1
a
I00M01O
W
J
a
q
� .�Q
0,00■
o,ovo
c0000
101
00
• • • •
• • • • •
1
T~
v
o
1 D
4
M M
I T
1 •,
I N
IN
1 A,
y
!
1
IZ
I
O
H
Q
.j
O'O a 0
0 0 lt1 0 in
1 00
a
04
0000
o f1hoN
1 0
W
e0
•' • • •.
. • • • •
1
a
0. 1-
M M
h q .01
CO
to
T.• N
1
a
00
.•M
• w
• w
1 w
W
4,4
H
I ./
y
I
I
1
1
I
7
I
I
W
H
O
+
U F-
I
H
W z
I
}
1
a
K w
1
M
'IH+
W>ti
O W
I
U
'0
Z
Q
U N
I
O
Z
y
1
4
H
OFF 1-
iW
F
HD
Z 40 M
1 0
1•
a
F FO
W QZ0
I Z
Ha'
1M
'=
I•W.WQ••IJ
w(A'-N000WWH
U
4LJU4
00H Z
1 F
0
JajU WF•
4Z;OXH •
t 4
yJ
I HHOH
70001-U
14
�H
O
00;1 aa;
07 LL�a HZ VI
1 W
N
I
a w W 4.
(A W. W 4 0 1-0
1 a'
.{
W>oU;
H40(L
1 0
G
W
4
JI
qI
'J
I J�
0
F
NM
rin4
•.i'N
0041do
n
H
Hoa01
F�
Uo
00•IjH
1 F•
0.PhhO
yTTtT
N'O
•
4Jr41-
Hrsrlll-
1 FI
0
__ ..I __I
® f
i
y
W
F
H ,
O i
2
W
4
W
M
O
0`
.i
0
J
4
z
z
W
L
F
fY
a
4
W
O
1
JN
1
HW
I
U?
I
z0
1
oa
�
U4
�
a
1
o
I
}
I
aN
i
FS OOpOOp qp
O,:: G1 ,:
C.
1
21LN NawLA
• i • i i�r
•i y,a
'J'.:�n rO
OO.IN
c
., c ,'I^',
;•
_, q i p
.,
HO r0
TAU
tousin
I
•� U% 1 U1
•
OW
00
0
QM
d
O0•4
r•
c7 rn M
T7 pr
' I
Fy o0pOOo
W'N Op0000 00
r
1
07SO C1gOOgj
'�
nU,Ja
•]<og01
LI W h' 0 4) o 0
1 • 1 I 4• �. • t
"`
-:! C'..P ::
i c::: -;, r� 1 0
Ki0 N •NO0
Moo N N
c7A•.0
. .�. ,°�
a
a D n :n
IN
Pi
:�
m .T 1 M
M
•
' �
I
I
N
1
F SIO NWIO0 I ppIz
Y
All r0' a0 M A M
�
,. !(
f i
u e'
; . •
a. 0 17 I •I
1 -
IOiT t0 A rO N IB
`'F.
e 1 1
M M.H t
10
• •
ro
-'V
I
Mi "1N
N•i •
I`
�.
•0
:n ago gOiOw q0,
WOOO qq OO
00 po�0000
Oo40p006m
00.
taq
0,000
1
OJ00-o I�
NF . I I
1'• •
0000
000 tl1d�
0W N O O N h
y • • • •
O IO• 0 SO •
I •�
I:• • r
0000
• • • • 1
p01A
•40 hi OOHH
OHO to N
ODNN'
OO 10
M N.4 In
ONS•0
.I,H I
S
A h I IIIN
�
a?
H
1.4 1h
I I
M M
IM
K 1
J do, o MN rTN NN
Ha DOO+S Nh tT 01
M040000ON
aNNNSh00o
00
ohoh
NN ooM 1T
to
00
000r0
NW 0o 01 IN
01F A O.40h SS
S',
tl tN 111SN O
UNN
t00r0
0S a I
r4,0 ,pw h
a N A M M
Nn10 S N
Ah
WNH
o0 oM IN
S N h .4 rp
UN N
0 .4 40
0.4 o r0 1 •4
A 10
M0 N
NN
S ?
UN,1110
A 0
0o
HH1.4
.
I
i
1
1
1
04 N,,de.i Too 00
0Nr000O.ioh
NOAN 4.OM Oa
o0
o0
0000
1
DO,OO rp I.t
I III n
000o
OG A0h Ib
In H'0M 000
NNNN a h
U, U1
.TOT 1 H
•4U S:NNO N
.00No M
h h
h0N I10
Q h! h H tp
M N N O S
0 W
S o t 1 N
•
0! h
DAH e
• •
N tl
40 • I
.V4 to to
H A t0
HHN1N
'
IV
1
>
1
I
1
r/1 rn
nN
yZ
Z 00
UNL y
W
�. HI
ON WW
H O W
K
ce I-u JJ
KCU U
I i
L
W
W
4'a 4.4 44
w0H �
N
IU
ce 2I
W K W I
JJ WNW rL4
NOz 0:x
L I
7� U24' �7
Z U.19 ZWW 000
HO W
NJNU y N
W}
4
al-LL •
I,,,0 W
O WW W 4tL0 W
W4y W O
z J
LLUl
H Wh-W
'J OF-y 10
y 1 OK IN
H WWW 4'T HW•
UUWW U zJ
OF
UKZU
1•• NNO.) 1F
I. U 70 JU
LL
HWU. 1- H aQ
H0
ZW WH
2 za IO I4
H•• H y
? J O y F J O
H F U?
W J Q y y I I.
H Z W 0.
Wy:7: W 4LLJ
4' 0(q 1-
4
4
,y W
L HWy01I.
WW
4r KW LZHN2 nLLa
ZZ
WJILSWZZW wU
}HJ
4H W
WNF>Wq Iy
W
U WHHO K2 (AOH
In 1_1 "O.J4
4L)4
Uy
OMU W I H
y yYFHLLWO 0!
YK OQ JH4 %
J•LF
W • •Z
OfZ10KN I I Z
W 4 W2UI:)Yy *UW
JW Wh'1-Q ZW I. -
hKH
UI-CHI-
07J0ZL) H
OI JWOK� 0".4zmF-00HJzt
144
HMM)-M
ISWJH4(A IL
J Q,7 WCe r)y� 0Ha
]WI - WOW YH WO
OW4
"W"yW
Ore RAH 10
W y.06L,1' St JLL
I-00;4 Ju1C KU
(7U
W0040
HK U 9.FL 14
W2 I ! J Ia, J
¢ 1
a J
WJ
O J J
1.. GO, ./DOOa N44
H yH•4Md'!NF
KHMM 0.4 MO N4
F•NQ
.1NM4
IHSdo4 14
10, HI -j
Fo a NMS Jep,oF
HIrk F
Foo 01.
U0 oom I- lF
Igo0otwoo 4-HO,
W61dSSISF
ZMimV)0)MMM40
Sid SSi4OS SF
0.A0
M00/00
ytPtPmm O
�F
I=SFI
401.
W 4 4 r1-
H4444
M
W,
m
So a
s
z
0
H V1
ZH
WM
L W
H cr
.g O
4W
us
W
O
MOMOOMaa
o D000000
• • • • • • • •
nlno.•0n o
1 {o Dm Sn 1
to o oN tOM D
• • • • •
N •i1NNH h
1 N
00000000
ooaa0000
N In 0 O In .1
N W M n J m
m O m T N 1
n .• i11 N .1 m
S N
M
I
S
NJo00 On1
I..
.I 1t
a 0 4..
. I
H
N O
N N N h N 1 P.
1
4
W L
0 WNm,0 NJ
H
In
mMnMJ .+O
W
.{ 10
.
O
co N.• 1
N
W
H
>
M
O
Z
7
O
t
0
0
}
H
H
U
0
W
NH
W W
NU
7
m
Oomoa000
00oo0ooa
1 n0NON 1A
0t'Qt 0 co N a .1
N'N IAmNJ m
o MSN.• M
J N
M N O O M no .1
N 111 0 N O W o W
• • • • • • • •
M.i toMWn m
O tON10M 0
,O a to N 1 W .d
N`4 141 N '10
M 1
N N o M n O o 4
m h O N m o O .4
In GO e0100 0
omom"o m
./W NAam 1
y NSN S
W
L
H
H L
} ) M
~ ~ mac
H zzz
J 4 4 Q 4 L H
J H J 0 W M O >
p 0n+ UZUK
7 2 U LD a W L
p MW4 u.WL rM
^• HWOS Q'W KLZ
H U r. O7W
/ 0. H p w • In UrJ
•lP� H >MWMM.. }W
�I 0: XWLWZHMOZ
U WHHHO KJZ
M MKi.o'H:L W 0.0
W 4O!4it) 7YtM
O J W J z O w W O:
I14 1 WMOOMOTOM
Io W: Z J
M W 00140 a'M 004
�I. HI MH.I N M'4 Nt0 r•
za000[0000
W 4'114i5
O D O o a 0 0 0 0 a
0000000000
• • • • • • • • • •
N N W N n ooze
1 o s N N N S M N
H m n n S M O N m
1 M S 1
•d
00000a0000
0 oo0oo000o
In N r7 Nn 0w Sa
JntoN« 0. a* IN
"'Din •'I
•
M M o m
.I
n T J 0 n O D» co n
O 0 NO Nco H
s .•N Nt01n
. M
0o00o0oo0o
a000000000
• • • • • • • • • •
N mNSJ MmmN
MNWm0 n.�InN
.1 .• t0 M a N m n M
M M n 10
IH
W NIna N 1m NON
M O N N S OWNS W
000 tO MM4 Jt00
NNN M oo1n.+W N
IN W,DmtiOM.i
N N 1 1
.I
o.i M N ZMN Smh
o qo .l tOMhnNM
• • • • • • • • • •
nN W m1'O INN
T N -4 S n M M N H
1N n.i Mt01M
w p
Rq
n M N
J M
O H
K z
O L U M
K
UWWMH z.OHJ
ML) W HHI` JM• 0.
UHHWJLL4 0:3
MOS:)YHLL0:+JM
WJW 7HF-Q'J U
Ht0>Wfn7zfL(A i
J w7 J+
Q,. • • . • .'W M
O. MMM VI MMM7MJ
O WWWWWWWLLLQ
MH HHH HHN .R.' H
J J J J J JJ Y Ire
+ (L LL 4 0, 0. O. (L O H r.
ul 3:)n7 :)7:3OZ4
JMMM(AMMwr:)r
H J
y.i Nm4Nt0 o o 04
W NNNNNNtO n 4 r.
I•'.i H .• A .a .• .I . N O
=IS r1111411r•
00000000aae
00000000000
• • • • • • • • • • •
o N O q
tpoW t0 q NtOM
10
•
N N N e
.1
00000000ao0
o ooa00000OO
.+ao In a n o
ID W tO O N11
}o. 0 coW N0
OtO J OOtD OO.Imh
m rttt0 Ot0 COON
Qom S NM .ION M
M H ,0 1.4 N m th
• w
N Nm
Ooonoo0o0ao
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
• • • • • • • • • •
N O N 0 J 0 W
M0 0.1 NLAN
Jm iN mN
• w
.I 0 m
t0 o M o O o 7 a M N h
tD N S O o 0 0 o N N h
0 0,10 N •/t0J
NnN M NInO
0 Mm H NMh
D M
nh
N N W O n 0 0 0 0 W •�
• • • • • • • • • • •
to H 0 N m .+
MNm n mh
tO N S In m
r •
N N NM
W
s z
KO
J t
N a.
W !A W
JJ K ••InU
a W H H M L W H
zH ZaWIII HN
Ini to TulUa1IC H-IW
MMz Q O.KHHJ*
WMO > H x 0 H
U W H} O > J W O H J
H LL 1-HL c74>WQ
:0 0< H W W 7 O
Q•Q: UUK U I- • • •r-
WIlHH Z .UMMMU
MY JF-HF'Q tY HHHK
J W LUU HH F-444I'
4 S F_Iil M 4 z z Q. IL O. Z
= 4. o J W K W O W W W O
F O UIJ O F. Q! U K W K0
U J
Q
I. N 0 0 O .i H 144 I-
zMMMM"400000
0 4 S 4 4 S S S S J 0 N
a o a a
0000
o O O
0 oD
O J1 {0
M mN
.i N
a o 0 0
mono
• • • •
0o0o
0000
N O U1
m n to
0 NM
N 0 40
♦1 .1
0000
0000
It • . •
0000
O O D D
NN
ao
co a
p •
to to
a •4
I ..
1
1
J lu
1
H IJ
I
L)
1
z O
1
oa
r, a
1
a
1
K
I
1
O
1
H
I
C /1
1
a O
0 o a
1 0
1-` —00 0010
y IJ
• • • •
1
H S
00
1 1D
Z S
00
I 10
H O
00
1 1
S U
• •
1
0w
NN
10
4 x
1414
1 N
1 14
W
1
W
I
tY
1
�
I
H
I
H
H W M o g 0
1 0
O
Zt- 000O
1 a
z
w w • 1••
I
w
S w 0 a
1 J '
a
H 00
1 N
x
'YU 00
I S
W
4 W • •
1
a K U1 U1
1 01
UJ -1
M
O
I -1
m
I
m
1
-1
1
I
N
I
I 0000
I 0
Aa
I
z II
• t
1
H
NO N N
1 10
4
c0 = -1 vi
1 .i
h
01 10 J7
1 .•1
W
.1 ID
I
n
1w
I S
I
r
1
w
1
1�
I
n
n agoo
1 0
w o00010
m
N H • 1 1•
I
coW
I
01 0
1 to
4
�
I •
H
m
I m
z
I0
w
1
=
1
F-
I
lY
I
a
1
W
J NgON
IA
❑
rl4 O011M
00 7 41 • •
I •
Q N N
I N
IM
t �
y
t
2
1
n
I
H
I
r
I
4
J 1..0 oh
I 0
K
O Q to 0lit
I 4
W
00 D • • • •
I
d
T /- LA Ln O
1 J)
J
,4U M c0 N
1 0
4 S M 10
I S
w •
1 •
2
N N
I M
W
11d
H
I •1 '
�
1
I
y
1
❑
1
z
1
0
yy
I
o
}z
1
S
J J
I
t0 H
I
U.
)•
a H y
1
O
H
w W Z
I
}
J
W 0! W
I
H
r
H O W
I
U
3
z oU y
I
W
F- ZZKVM
l
'13
LL W'J
zQZy I
W
H ZHWWHIQ
'M
K WH>I00
1 H
U W Q z
1 1
a' W H •
1 a
w
W COJ 0 I-U
I
.I
O mJNZy
1 w W
N
NU
a0S
10
a
W J
I J
h
�+�U o l01 a r'
1 1-
dl-I;
r
=old
I
I
i
I
i +I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
i
I
1
1
I 1
I i i i
i I I
I
I
I
'.i
0
rn
z
Z
w
f-
Q.
♦—
r7
_w
u
r
IS
LL
r
_j
1--
ri
Io
0
40
Ln
„erj
Ln ± 0-r
mo
Onl r6
a
_f
rl`�
r
° Ln
I(]
I
lu I f•
� rb
v
Oilry'
I
`i
0
�J
lrt
1
i�''0 0
0
r) 0
w Ii
j'is
u
.4 t o
(r
i_
lail
• rf1 rd
ul
- rtl
p
n��,
U�r,l"
}•I0
0 -- ,--�
3 Ln
cy
o-
G, -
iV
' I
j
jai' ,I•
-t r6�
J
oIqo-o�
J
u
Ln
r a.,� r
'Ll,�
iI
I
If err
If
—
r
1 r)
I
i
I
,n
G
i
0
(y G 0
Do rn
U
to
IJ
III
p int
C- a-
rff
0 111
In
o 1,
Do
N
0 (l) Ln
=
T
�- 00
r6
LA rn
I
u 0
ri,
oIn
0
O
o
IOIL) In N
r�
0 r) ••
p
ryj10
•.
_
n-
(
In
f
I
i
,IL arc
r�
f6
_
9ir�Ill
I_In"�
10
. Y!Vi
...
LII
4L
, III
0
111
�
:1
0
u
- < '`�
'91:
0 d)
cr
r6- r.
16i
6
0111
k
0 0
y L,
rb li W
r iI r�l
j-ir6
0-
pF Ir o
a
rI
s
rd 6 �'
.1
S
mI
clui
'
c
lu
i
,�
I;
it
0I1 < <
_
Inju
tl
,
m II
-•
u!�I d 31 m
V)
,II •�
�
I
C t
I 91 �
^P
I t K O �
uj
•.II
_ N TO: Mayor 6 Council
FROM: Finance Director -Treasurer Brager
DATE: October 13, 1982
RE: UTILITY MAINTENANCE AND RECONSTRUCTION FUNDING
At a recent budget session there was some discussion of
establishing a charge for water and sewer system repair and re-
construction. It was my understanding that a charge of $5.00 to
be divided equally between the water and sewer funds was discussed.
Such a charge could be established on a per account basis
per quarter; i.e., $2.50 per water account and $2.50 per sewer
account. If established, such a charge would generate $27,350 per
year for the water fund and $27,440 per year for the sewer fund
based upon the present number of water and sewer accounts ( 2,735
water; 2,744 sewer).
Staff feels that if Council wishes to implement such charge,
that consideration should be given to adjusting the present rate
structure to account for it rather than establishing a separate
charge for it. Staff believes that maintenance and reconstruction
of the existing system is a cost of doing business and should be
part of present rate structures. It is further felt that retaining
one rate for water and one for sewer is more easily understood by our
customers and also would be easier to administrate. The higher users
of both the water and sewer systems would pay proportionately more
than the lower users.
If the rates were to be adjusted to raise on an annual basis
the same amount as $2.50 per account per quarter, it would require
an adjustment in water rates of $0.07 per 1,000 gallons and $1.46
per REC per quarter. Staff would recommend that any money raised
in this manner be put into a special account which could only be
drawn upon after receiving Council approval.
If you have any questions do not hesitate to contact me.
TO: Mayor, City Council, and
Clerk -Administrator
FROM: Chief of Police
DATE: October 14, 1982
RE: No Parking Signs on Edgewood Drive
The Police Department has received a number of complaints regarding
citizens parking on both side of the street by Edgewood Community
Center.
I have checked the area and found that their is sufficient parking space
in the lot, but the people chose to park on the street. I talked to
Paul Donley from Edgewood and he also feels that their is a parking
problem.
I request that no parking signs be installed on the West side of the
street from 5101 Edgewood Drive to County Road H.
JOHN A. MILLER
ATTORNEY AT LAW
4725 EXCELSIOR OOULEVARD
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55416
�� I�.I IL 1, T[urvnnrt 920.0600
" October 14, 1982
C': �At\4
r pI IDS-'
Members of the City Council
City of Mounds View
2401 Hwy. #10
Mounds View, Minnesota 55112
Dear Members of the City Council:
I am enclosing herewith a final plat map of my property
identifying the portion that was approved by the City Council
for final platting on March 9, 1981. I would appreciate an
opportunity to appear before you at your agenda meeting
October 18th. I would also appreciate a late setting if that
is possible because another committment that starts at 6:45.
�yery•truly yours,
JAMwm John A. Miller
i
I� 0f VOW ��SI�
IIAMUV I:o UNIY.MINNEso EA
240111IGPIWAY 10
MI)NNnS VIEW. MINN 55117
7563055
UCLober 29, 1981
John A. Millcr
Attorney at Law
530 Excelsior Boulevard
Minneapolis, MN 55416
Ikc: Miller 11"lustrial Park Plat
Dear Mr. Miller:
City Staff has completed its review of: your proposed Final Plat
named above. This review has included the City Engineer and
Attorney. I now offer you the following direction pursuant to
the reviews that have Laken place:
1) Your proposed final Plat is ❑oL in a form which is
acceptable by Ramsey County for filing. Secondly,
since your proposed Final Plat represents your inter-
pretation of City Council direction given to you on
March 9, 1901, it is recommended that you use this
final plat. as a "modified" preliminary plat based on
the direction given by the City Council. Therefore,
your request to the Council would then be to review
the modified preliminary plat for their approval so
you can move to final plat stage.
2) Your modified preliminary plat should include a drain-
age plan that will meet the requirements of Resolution
No. 903 and Ordinance Nos. 301 and 305.
3) Your modified preliminary plat submission should include
a statement of your intentions and method of serving
the property with necessary utilities.
4) As you are aware, a Park Fund Dedication is due for
your subdivision. You should provide the City with an
appraised value of the land with which the City could
base a dedication on. Please note the City does have
the right to ::eek its own appraisal should the value be
disputed.
MOUNDS VII'W CITY COUNCIL
Spocial and Regular M01Ing
Open Meeting Law that is he.inq expressed fry,
0111eetings being called at frequent agenda
ra%� sessions when there is no cnaergenr.y involved
in the business being transacted, 2) meetings
held outside and inside City Ilall that are not
clearly announced and are being held at hours
when citrzens would find iL hard to attend,
3) waiving IJno reading of resolutions, flow
can you justify rLalm uvtl.s of keeping the
public informed when those things are not being
read'.+ The reading of a number doesn't inform
the c:onmuniLy of the business being Lransacted.
It doesn't take that lung to read. Also it
Wild leave no reason for people to leave
meetings held in this City feeling I.he,y had
wasted their lime in attendance and ds though
they rosily hadn't seen their gnvcrnntent work
for them. Also, 1 don't know if the Mayor and
Council del' awdre that many times the discussions
cannot be heard by its audience and especially lint
by the senior citizens or hearing impaired
citizens of which there are many! As public
officials I feel you should iannediillrly strive Lo
reinforce your respect for the Open Meeting Law
by preventing these prar.ticies from continuing.
Mayor McCarty pointed out to Mrs. McCarthy
that every item in the Council packet, including
., resolutions, was in a folder on a table in the
Council Chambers for public reviewal. Further-
more, the City CharLer allows dispensation of
reading resolutions by unanimous consent of
the Council and residents or always read on
request of anyone in the audience. Mayor
McCarty asked if Mrs. McCarthy had the records
(of the meetings that she was objecting to)
and if she knew when the meeLings were held.
Mrs. McCarthy replied she did not.
Mayor McCarty stated, "Then you are talking
about soniothing you know nothing about."
There were no more comments from the floor.
REGULAR MEETING CLOSED: 7:42 p.m.
PUBLIC HEARING OPENED: 7:42 p.m.
March 9, 19H1
Page Three
Applicant requests approval of a preliminary 9. Public Hearing - Miller
Plat called Miller Industrial Plat and rezoning industrial Plat - 2400 Co.
Of the land which presently has sections of Rd. J - Preliminary Plat
R-1 acid B-2 to I-1 for development of an Review - Reaoning
+ti Industrial Park. Case 47-80
o./
THE
PRECEDING
0
DOCUMENT(S)
HAVE
BEEN
REFILMED
FOR
LEGIBILITY
i
W
�if of o ie
u� s
IIAM$L
John A. Miller
Attorney at Law
510 Excelsior Boulevard
Minneapolis, MN 554.1G
No: Miller Industrial park flat•
October
29, 1901
Dear Mr. Miller:
Y I;U UN I Y, MIN NESO IA
7401 1/1(:IIWAv to
MOUNDS VIEW. MINN 55117
)na)000
City Staff has completed its review of: your proposed Final Plat
named above. This review has included the City Engineer and
Attorney. I now offer you the followinu direction pursuant to
the reviews that have taken place:
1) Your proposed final flat is not in a form which is
acceptable by Ramsey County for filing. Secondly,
since your proposed Final Plat represents your inter-
pretation of City Council direction given to you on
March 9, 1901, it is recommended that you use this
final p.laC as a "modified" preliminary plat based on
the direction given by the City Council. Therefore,
your request to the Council would then be to review
the modified preliminary plat for their approval so
you can move to final plat stage.
2) Your modified preliminary plat should include a drain-
age plan that will meet the requirements of Resolution
No. 903 and Ordinance Nos. 301 and 305.
3) Your modified preliminary plat submission should include
a statement of your intentions and method of serving
the property with necessary utilities.
4) As you are aware, a Park Fund Dedication is due for
your subdivision. You should provide the City with an
appraised value of the land with which the City could
base a dedication on. Please note the City does have
the right to seek its own appraisal should the value be
disputed.
Mr. mill -or
Page 2
October 29, 1901
L would uug µ::;t LhaL yuu cianplatc Lk! nuccusary details mentioned
above an soon an yuu ran :;u I.i;at I.I;c mal:tcr crm be reviewed by
tilt! City Council. Should you need more information or see the
uucJ to have a conference, please contact me at my office.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
C'Y 01' MOUNDS VIEW
Steven A. Rose Up\
Building & Zoning Official
SAR/bc
ri
MOIINIIS VIfN CITY COUNCIL March 9, 19111
Special and Reqular M01iol Page. lhrec
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Open Meeting Law that is hr.inq expressvd by,
I)muetings being culled dt frequent agenda
sessions when Lhorr is no runrquitcy involved
in the business being transacted, 2) meetings
held outside and inside City Hall that are not
clearly announced and are being held at hours
when citizens would find it hard to attend,
J) waive ng the re,rding of resolutions. Ilow
can you ,justify sLalrn¢vrls of kerpinq the
public informed when these things are not beinq
rrud? The reddiug of a number doesn't inform
the comnuniLy of the. business heing Lransactrd.
It duesn't take that lung to read. Also it
would leave no ro,rson for peuple to leave
meetings held in this City ford inq Lhry had
wasted their Lime in attendance and ds though
they really hadn't seen their gnvernmont work
for them. Also, I don't know if the Mayor and
Council ire aware that many times the discussions
cannot be heard ly its audienrp and especially not
by the senior citizens or hearing impaired
citizens of which there are many! As public
Officials i feel you should inunedialely strive to
reinforce your respect for the Open Meeting Law
by preventing these practicies from continuinc_I.
Mayor McCarty pointed out to Mrs. McCarthy
that every item in the Council packet, including
resolutions, was in a folder on a table in the
Council Chambers for public reviewal. Further-
more, the City Charter allows dispensation of
reading resolutions by unanimous consent of
the Council and residents or always read on
request of'anyone in the audience. Mayor
McCarty isked if Mrs. McCarthy had [he records
(of the meetings that she was objecting to)
and if she knew when the meeLinils were held.
Mrs. McCarthy replied she did not.
Mayor McCarty stated, "Then you are talking
about something you know nothing about."
There were no more comments from the. floor.
REGULAR MEETING, CLOSED: 7:42 p.m.
PUBLIC HEAR1110 OPENED: 7:42 p.m.
Applicant requests approval of a preliminary 9. Public Hearing - Miller
plat called Miller Industrial Plat and rezoning Industrial Plat - 2400 Co.
of the land which presently has sections of Rd. J - Preliminary Plat
R-1 avid D-2 to 1-1 for development of an Review - Reaoning
+,ti Industrial Park. Case 47-80
MOUNDS VIEW CITY COUNCIL March g, I901
Special and Regular Mettin`I Page Four
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Gary Comstock, Engineer, representing Mr,
" Miller reviewed Lhe, proposed plat.
Discussion in length took, placr, rogarding the
wetlands located within the pruposaI.
Councilmember Hodges discussed the concerns that
the Ramsd'y County Soil and Water Conservation
District have regarding the wetlands located
within the proposal.
Mayor McCarty asked if there were any comments
from the audience for the public han•ing.
There were none.
PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED: 7:56 p.m.
REGULAR MEETING RE-OPENFD: 7:56 p.m.
Concilmember Doty discussed the following:
1) The information that the Council had been
provided by Official Rose regarding poor soils
that were located on the proprrty, water table,
and substance of the soils.
2) That a piece of property located within Mr.
Miller's proposal was not included in the. Wetland
—� SLudy.
3) He cited information and wetland data sheets
`s that had been received from Ramsey County Soil
and Water Conservation District.
City Attorney Meyers asked the Council if they
were familiar with the property.
Mayor McCarty stated that lie has walked the land
himself. He stated that the only concession
that has been made by the developer is the
change in zoning.
Councilmember Forslund stated that she has walked
the property. She further slated that she was
concerned about the soils and asked if soil
borings had been done.
Mayor McCarty stated that soil horings have been
made.
Mr. Comstock stated that they plan to ronove
the unsuitable soils. Ile stated that about 75
soil borings have been done.
Councilmember Hodges stated that he has walked
through the land several times.
MOUNDS VIEW CITY COUNCIL.
Special and Regular Meeting
----------------------------------------
Mayor McCarty asked if Mr. Miller would be
willing to amend the plat.
Mr. Miller stated that he was not amiable to
an amended plat.
Councilmember Blanchard stated that she is
familiar.dith the property, but that she had
not recently walked it, but had done so many
times as a youth, and that the property had
always been wet.
MOTION: Mayor McCarty made a motion, seconded by
Fors and to approve the preliminary plat for Lot 1,
Block 1, and Lots 1, 2, 12 &13, of Block 2, subject
to the remainder of Block 2 being designated as an
outlot, to grant approval for the rezoning from R-1
& B-2 to 1-1, except for the land within the outlot
which would be subject to the provisions of
Ordinance No. 301.
The vote was taken by calling of the roll.
Ayes-5
Nays-0 MOTION CARRIED.
Official Rose discussed the different classi-
44 fications of Wetlands. He stated that Block 1
on the Ramsey County Soils Map indicates a
wetland that needs to be studied.
AMENDMENT TO THE MOTION: Mayor McCarty made a
motion, seconded by Doty, to approve the
preliminary plat for Lots 1, 2, 12 & 13, of
Block'2, only, subject to the remainder of
Block 2 being designated as an outlot, and to
approve the rezoning from R-1 and B-2 to I-1,
except for the land within the outlot which
would be subject to the provisions of
Ordinance No. 301.
The vote was taken by calling of the roll.
Ayes-4
.�r+-• ,wwaluurmuer nuuges voted nay).
MOTION CARRIED.
COUNCIL RECESSED FOR A BREAK: 8:26 p.m.
COUNCIL RE -CONVENED AT: 8:44 p.m.
AMENDMENT TO THE AMENDED MOTION: Mayor McCarty
ma e a motion, seconded by Hodges to further
anjand the last action by approving the pre-
liminary plat to allow development on Lot 1,
31ork 1, excepting wetland areas therein, and
to grant rezoning approval from R-1 and B-2
March 9. 1981
Page Five
-------------------------
�d MOUNDS VIEW CITY COUNCIL March 9, 1981
special and Regular Meeting Page Six
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I to 1-1, on Lot 1, Block i for Lice area uLher
than wetlands and further that the identified
r/ wetlands area be subject to the provisions in
Ordinance No. 301.
The vote was taken by cal Iinq of the. roll.
Ayes-5 '
Nays-0 — 140TION CARRIED.
Clerk -Administrator Pauley asked to have 10. Approval of Consent Agenda
Item E removed for discussion.
MOTION: Councilmember Forslund made a motion,
seconded by Doty to approve the Consent Agenda
(eliminating Item E) and to waive the reading
of the Resolutions.
Ayes-5
Nays-0 MOTION CARRIED.
Clerk -Administrator Pauley asked that Item E
be tabled until the. March 23, 1981, City
Council Meeting in order that f.ouncilmemhers
who had voiced concern over this issue could
have the opportunity to discuss it with him
and other members of the Council.
i
MOTION: Couneilmcmber Duly made a motion,
seconded by Forslund to table Item r until
the March 23, 1981, City Council Meeting.
Ayes-5
Nays-0 , MOTION CARRIED.
Official Rose stated that he had no report.
11. Report of Building and
Zoning Official
Finance Director Brager stated that he was get-
12. Report regarding City's
ting proposals from three different agents
Insurance Coverages
regarding liability and property insurance
for the City. He said that he could obtain
the proposals by the end of March so that
Council could review than in April and a
decision could be made by May 1, 1981. Ile
further asked if proposals or bids should
be pursued.
MOTION: Councilmember Hodges made a motion,
seconded by Blanchard, to seek proposals
instead of formal bids to be received by
March 30, 1981.
Ayes-5
Nays-0 MOTION CARRIED.
POPHAM, HAI
K
MINNI. APOIIS ES(]j!,
F
1 nl runrlr ANDnpD mFcmNrn
(112 333 41I1H
�/]
O.AWDA JONLS
DENVER
2660 PETRO-LEWIS TOWER
SAl IT A JOHN!;ON
DENVER. COLORADO 80202
IF,I SHELNI
GARY C PARISH
J MICHAEL MORGAN
TELEPHONE AND TELECOPHIN
LFSLIr 1i11.LL11L
p DANIEL SCHEID
303.8283660
MICHAEL t NILAN
ROIIFRt C MORANEN
DAVID 11'I1011151
CATHERINE A POLASKI
WASHINGTON. D. C.
SICULN G. RI IAf HS
AAHRI I N M MIIINFII
CHARLES M Sr EGER III
SUITE 802
NANCY J INR I
JAMES DOUGLAS WELCH
2000 L STREET. N. W.
111.111 F. CHR05
MICHAEL A IIAMMAAER
W.ASHINGTON. 0. C. 20036
DII PI -SE AMDIUISAO
J014N P. CONNOLLY
TELEPHONE AND TELECOPIER
DOUGI ASP STATOR
RCIDP I StWRZ
202.607-5I56
October 12, 1932
Mayor and City Council
city of Mounds View
2401 NE Highway 10
Hew Brighton, MN 55112
Re: Proposed Tetlands/Floodplains Ordinance
Dear Mayor and City Council:
This letter summarizes the actions taken by the City
Council at the Council meeting of October 11, 1902:
1. The public hearing on the wetlands ordinance was
opened at 7:49 p.m.
2. On behalf of my clients, I distributed and reviewed
a letter addressed to the Mayor and City Council
outlining same of the legal and factual reasons why
my clients objected to the ordinances and which
letter requested copies of the information
referenced in the ordinances so that we could
analyze the proposed ordinances and react
intelligently to them.
3. I asked that since the floodplain ordinance was not
the subject of this public hearing that the adoption
of the wetlands ordinance be continued until after
the public hearing on the floodplain ordinance was
held, so that we could analyze the combined effect
and interaction of both ordinances.
POPHAM, HAIK, SCHNOBRICH, KAUFMAN & DOTY, LTD.
Uctubur 1-1, 198;! 1
Palle 2
4. I asked that• the City Council direct its staff to
meet with me and my clients to discuss how the
ordinances would affect their properties.
5. I asked for an explanation of how various provisions
of the ordinances affected my clients and their
properties.
G. The Mayor closed the public hearing at 8:22 p.m.
7, The Council then refused to answer any of my
questions and refused to continue the public hearing
as I had requested even though this was the first
chance for public input at a public hearing after
ov::: three years of review by the Council and its
selected committees.
B. Instead the Mayor then read several amendments to
the ordinance, none of which were provided to the
public before (although they were dated October 8,
1982) and none of which were included in the notice
of public hearing (which public hearing, in fact,
was ordered only after an attorney from my office
had demanded a public hearing at the City Council
meeting of September 27, 1902).
Without discussion, the Council then adopted the
amendments.
9. There was then a motion and a second to approve the
ordinance as amended. I objected again, stating
that these procedures violated the procedural due
process rights of my clients since:
a) Those amendments were made orally, at the last
minute.
b) The amendments were substantial in nature,
affecting greatly the value of my clients'
properties,
c) Lack of prior public notice.
10. The Mayor and City Council then adopted the
ordinance as amended.
J
I100%N
POPHAM, HAIK, SCHNOBRICH, KAUFMAN 6 DOT-.. L o-
October 12, 1982
Page 3
11. The Council then recevS ed the meeting at 8:40 p.m.
For the above reasons, it is obvious that as in the past,
the City had no intention of holding a meaningful public
hearing on the ordinance. The city wrongfully refused to
answer questions asked and "railroaded" through amendments
after the public hearing was closed. The lack of procedural
due process and lack of a meaningful public hearing was
underscored again by the fact that after the ordinance was
adopted, the Mayor gave to a citizen a certificate of thanks
which had already been dated as October 11, 1982, on the
presumption that the ordinance would he adopted that evening
regardless of the input at the public hearing.
I have never seen such callous disregard for the
procedural and substantive due process rights of property
owners as has been exhibited during the continued denial of my
clients' development proposals and the adoption of this
wetlands ordinance.
This letter serves as a notice of claim for loss of
property value and denial of my clients' legal rights, to the
City based on the above actions.
At this time, I demand that the City answer in writing
the questions set forth in my letter of October 11, 1982 and
that the City provide immediately a certified copy of the
ordinance as adopted, a copy of the minutes of the October 11,
1982, Council meeting, and a copy of the information requested
in that letter.
I await your response.
Very truly yours,
Bruce D. Malkerson
BD M/ j f
1487j
PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MOUNDS VTFW
RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA
UNAPPRO/m Regular Meeting
October 11, 1982
Mounds View City Hall
2401 Hwy. 10, Mounds View, MN 55112
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Mounds View City Council was called to order by 1. Call to Order
Mayor McCarty at 7:37 PM.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Councilmembers Forslund, Blanchard, 2. Roll Call
otyIf Hors and Mayor McCarty.
ALSO PRESENT: City Attorney Mevers, flerk/Admini-
strator Pauley and Public Works/Community Development
Director Johnson.
Mayor McCarty clarified his position, and the feel- 3. ADDroval of
ings of the Council, regarding the delinquent tax Minutes:
bills as discussed at the September 27 meeting, and September 27,
misrepresented in the New Brighton Bulletin. He 1982 and Octobe
—emphasized that the Council was not angry with Staff. 4. 1982
.otion/Second: McCarty/Hodges to express a complete
and total vote of confidence in favor of the Staff
members.
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
It was also noted that while the bids came in higher
than projected for the Oak Park project, the cost is
to be paid by the developer, and not the City.
Motion/Second: Doty/Hodges to approve the September
777MT—minutes as corrected.
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Motion/Second: McCarty/Forslund to approve the
bcto er 82 minutes as presented.
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Motion/Second: McCarty/Doty to recind the motion
made by McCarty, seconded by Doty, on October 4,
1982, directing Staff to send a second letter in
reference to unpaid utility bills.
ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Motion/Second: Forslund/Doty to take Resolution
No. 5� 02 from the table.
5 ayes 0 nay:, Motion Carried
Mounds View City Council U.
Fs ! v October 11, 1982
Regular Meeting U.6 U 1 �� g 1 �+ Page Two
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Motion/Second: Forslund/Doty to deny Resolution
,10. 2--
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Mayor McCarty closed the regular meeting and opened
the public hearing at 7:40 PM.
James Celt, 7751 Greenwood Drive, stated he owns a 4.
Public Hearing:
lot south of County Road I, which he has been trying
Ordinance No. 31
to develop for the past five years, and he feels the
Creating Muni -
proposed ordinance will make the land undevelopable.
cipal Code Chap -
He stated he has had many meetings in the past, and
ter 48, "Wetland
an engineering study has shown it to be buildable,
Zoning Ordinance
and in meetings with representatives from FEMA,
the flood plain organization, they have stated it
was buildable. He added, however, if the ordinance
is approved, he cannot build on the property. Mr.
Celt asked what the implications of the ordinance
would be for him, and asked whether the City would
purchase his lard in the flood plain, He also
pointed out that his lot has value, and it falls within
100' of the flood plain, and asked if he would be
allowed to build.
City Attorney Meyers replied that the ordinance
will authorize the acquisition of property, if
needed to preserve wetlands, but the City would not
be purchasing the property by adopting the ordinance. He stated
Mr. Celt world have to apply to have his lot considered for
developmuit after the ordinance becomes effective air] sliould make
application for a building permit. He also advised Mr. Celt
to point out to the Council how the ordinance impacts his
property.
Mr. Celt stated he is not interested in building on
the lot but would like to sell it.
Paul Videen, of Midland-Videen, Inc. 2887 No. Wheeler,
Roseville, presented a letter to the Council, and
read the letter, stating he is in favor of the
ordinance but has two problem areas, those being
48.05 Subd. 2, and Subd. 5-C. Mr. Videen explained
he has people who have the ability and are interested
in building a commercial building on his property.
Perry Langer, 1743 Florence St., White Bear Lake, and
Bill Langer, 1005 South Circle, Fridley, stated they
agreed with Mr. Videen's statements, and asked when
the ordinance would take effect.
Mayor McCarty replied the ordinance, if adopted this
Mobnds View City
Regular Meeting
Council
;Ap
E 9 N' P ;
D'
October 11 1982
----------------------
-',
-� p
_ I�-------------------
Page Three
, —evening, would take approximately 45 days to go into
ffect.
Bruce Malkerson, of Popham, Haik, Schnobrich,
Kaufman & Doty, Ltd., 4344 IDS Center, Minneapolis,
stated he is representing Messrs. John and Jim
Miller, Fred 0. Watson Co., and Keith Harstad, all
of whom own property within the City. He presented
the Council with a lengthy letter regarding the
proposed ordinance, and explained he has several
unanswered questions, and reviewed many of them.
Mr. Malkerson stated he has reviewed the proposed
flood plain ordinance, and feels it is important
for the City to do the flood plain and wetlands
ordinance together. He stated his clients have
objections to the ordinance in its present form,
and have several unanswered questions, and that
without the information they are requesting to
answer these questions, they cannot judge the total
impact of the ordinance on them.
Mr. Malkerson asked that the Council appoint some-
one, whether it be a Staff person, Councilmember,
or whoever, to sit down with him and his clients
—end go over their many areas of question, and
cplain how this ordinance would work. He added
,.hat his clients do not want to come in and apply
after the ordinance is adopted, and then discover
problems.
Mr. Malkerson stated he feels the proposed ordinance
is a concientious taking, and a violation of rights,
and he is putting the City on notice, as he believes
the City will be liable for damages if the ordinance
is adopted as is. He also asked to be informed of
the procedure to be followed for the flood plain
ordinance.
Mr. Malkerson also suggested several items he feels
should be included in the ordinance, as listed on
page four of his letter to the Council. He explained
that millions of dollars of tax base would be taken
off the tax rolls if the ordinance is adopted as is.
He also read a Court statement, from 283 N.W.2d 538 at
544, regarding the Court's feelings on taking of
property and awarding damages. Mr. Malkerson
summarized his stand on the ordinance and asked again
for someone to be appointed to work with him and his
clients, as only then would they have a better
understanding of what the City is trying to
'complish.
Fred Watson, of the Fred Watson Co., 252 S. Plaza
Building, Minneapolis, stated he has been waiting
for the past two years for something to come to a
Mounds View City Council m � : October 11, 1982
Regular Meeting Ud �yli..i%�ED Page dour
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
head. He questioned how the elevation was deter- '
mined, and stated the wetlands seem to have been
determined very arbitrarily and asked who the
engineer was.
Attorney Meyers replied that the City has been
involved with water and wetlarcis control for a number of years and
11kit it lus been working on a wetland ordinance for
quite some time, with both City Staff and other profes-
sionals working on it. He explained that one of
the first priorities was to take an inventory of
the wetlands in the City, which was done with county
assistance. He stated that the City had professional,
technical help in determining what wetlands were
v,ithin the City limits and what restrictions
should apply. He added the definition of wetlands has been
developed through the use of technical data.
Mr. Watson asked if there were areas that were
definitely shown in the flood plain but left
out of the wetlands area, and asked specifically
who the engineering people were.
Attorney Meyers replied the City has retained
various professionals over the years to aid
in the development of the inventory and
drafting of the proposed amendment. lie
added this ordinance will regulate
the use of wetlands in the City. Mayor McCarty
added that the wetlands inventory was done
mainly by the Ramsey County Soil and Water
Conservation District.
Tom Peterson identified himself as a conservation
specialist with the Ramsey County Soil and Water
Conservation District, and explained the process
that was used. He stated the maps were done
in the summer of 1980, with air photos taken,
and aquatic specialists hired to identify the
wetland areas, and the area was then field checked,
and the water resources map provided to the City.
John Miller stated he has a specific objection
to identifying parcel 22 in the northwest corner
of his property, Wetland #1-22, as a wetland, as
it is designated as 1.1 acres of wetlands, and
he feels it is not. He also stated he has a
general objection to the ordinance.
Jim Cepress, of Dynamic Designers, 2233 West
County Road R, Roseville, stated his property
has been put in the wetland area, and that he
has been in the process for the past two years
of trying to develop this property. He stated
he was given permission to br' ; in fill, which
a 3 i" 101".•g l: l A !
Mounds View City Council fi� f^r����( F'"9—U October 11, 1982
Regular Meeting V ! C.y 8.. Page Five
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
brought it well above the specified level, and
^auld like to speak to someone about this, as he
2s not feel it should be classified a wetland.
was directed to speak: to Director of Public Works/
Community Development Johnson.
Keith Harstad stated his objections have been noted
through Mr. Malkerson, and that he personally
vehemently objects to the ordinance. He stated he
owns three parcels which are substantially affected
by this ordinance. Mr. Harstad asked that the
ordinance be tabled to allow time for them to discuss
it further and have their questions answered.
Joseph Goebel, 8121 Long Lake Road, identified him-
^lf as a professional soil scientist and geologist,
and stated he was very pleased to see the City has
finally come forward with a very responsible ordi-
nance on the wetlands. He added the issue came out
of the City's total water problem, and he feels that
wetlands can contribute to the overall quality of
life in the City of Mounds View.
After asking for any additional comments and
receiving none, Mayor McCarty closed the public
hearing and reopened the regular meeting at 8:22 PM.
.here were no residents requests or comments from 5. Residents Re -
the floor. quests and
Comments from
the Floor
Motion/Second: Blanchard/Hodges to approve the
6. Approval of
consent agenda as presented, and waive the reading
Consent Agenda
of the resolutions.
5 ayes 0 nays
Motion Carried
Motion/Second: Forslund/Doty to approve the second
7. Approval of
reading ot Ordinance No. 318 amending the municipal
Second Reading
code of the City of Mounds View by creating Chapter
of Ord. No. 318
48, "Wetland Zoning Ordinance".
Amending the
Municipal Code
Councilmember Forslund - aye
Df the City of
Councilmember Blanchard - aye
Mounds View by
Councilmember Doty - aye
Creating Chapter
Councilmember Hodges - aye
48, "Wetland
Mayor McCarty - aye
Zoning Ordinanc(
Motion Carried
Mayor McCarty read the suggested language amendments
to the ordinance.
Mounds View City Council _ j�"' October 11, 1982.
Regular Meeting Page ;`�"' 44" �'y nn Page Six
--------------- ------ --L I( ��`-----------------------
Motion/Second: Doty/Blanchard to amend Chapter 48.07
�-ZT as proposed.
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Motion/Second: Forslund/Hodges to approve the
amendment of the language to Chapter 48.08, Subdi-
visions 1 and 2.
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Attorney Meyers gave an explanation of the changes in
language and how they applied to the ordinance.
Director of Public Works/Community Development Johnson
presented two items that should be considered with the
ordinance, Resolution No. 1389 which requires drain tile,
and Chapter 48.06, Subd. 4, A, 3, which does not include
building permits, but clarifies it as subdivisions and condi-
tional use permits. He added he did not feel these two
items would conflict- with the ordinance.
Motion/Second: Doty/Forslund to adopt
as amen ed, amending the municipal
City of Mounds View by creating Chapter
Zoning Ordinance".
Councilmember
Councilmember
Councilmember
Councilmember
Mayor McCarty
Forslund
Blanchard
Ordinance No.
code of the
48, "Wetland
aye
aye
Doty - aye
Hodges - aye
- aye
Mr. Malkerson pointed out that some major amendments
were adopted that were not part of the prior pub-
lications. He stated he has not had an opportunity
to determine how these will work. He stated he had
asked earlier, and is asking again, for an opportunity
to discuss the ordinance and have questions answered.
He added it is a matter of procedural due process to
delay it for at least two weeks to allow time to have
these questions answered.
Attorney Meyers responded in his opinion the ordinance and
amendments were legal. He added that he has seen few
major pieces of legislation that have received the
approval of everyone, and that quite a bit of time
and deliberation have gone into fulfilling everything
that is required. He added that they followed
Chapter 462 of the State Statutes, and that due process
has been given. lie also stated that all suggestions received by the
City have been given consideration.
Mayor McCarty stated he would like to recognize all
the many people who have been very important in this
process, such as Dr. Joseph Goebel, Robert Glazer,
the Planning Commissioners - Gene Anderson, Sharon
1
Motion Carried
Mounds View City Council , ' ., (P'9 - October 11, 1982
Regular Meetings ""' o Page Seven
-------------------------- ------------�r- V------------------
.-.McCarthy, Josey Warren, Jean Miller, Ken Breske,
erry Linke and Chairman Peg Mountin, as well as all
,.he people who worked long hours and attended many
meetings.
Mayor McCarty gave a special thanks to Neil Loeding,
and presented him with a certificate of thanks,
declaring him the official "Keeper of the Cattails".
Mayor McCarty, on behalf of the City Council, again
thanked everyone involved for their hard work on
the ordinance.
Finance Director Brager reported that, in addition 8. Third Quarter
to normal duties, the Finance Department had been Department Head
very busy working with the Council on the 1983 Reports
budget, and he felt a good job had been done, with
the property tax increase being kept to 3.9%, while
the City is maintaining their central services.
Finance Director Brager reported they had assisted
the Clerk/Administrator at the counting center for
the primary election, and the ballot counter that
malfunctioned has been sent out for repair and is
" iue back in time for the general election.
r'inance Director Brager reported the special assess-
ment for Silver Lake Woods has been certified with
the County, and two pre -payments have been received.
He reported also that they expect to continue work-
ing on the budget and elections in the next quarter,
and that they have received three proposals for the
audit of the 1982 records. He reported also that
the word processor will serve as a remote terminal
at City Hall to hook up to the Ramsey County
computer, and they hope to have the utility programs
up by the first of the year, and hope to end 1983
with all systems operational at City Hall. He
explained this should reduce some operating costs
in data processing, and should make it a much more
marketable system. He added they hope to develop
a marketing plan to recruit other cities, which
would lower the cost for Mounds View,
Finance Director Brager reported the City is pretty
much on target with the 1982 budget to date.
Park Director Anderson reported the third quarter
had been very busy for the Rec programs, with the
Festil4al in the Park being a great success and
'ie opening of the Edgewood Community Resource
enter on September 15.
Mounds View City Council
Regular Meeting' " " '"
'' )C S6 As October 11 1982
------------ ��i__ �.. U11 __ Page Eight Via'- n-- _____ '
Park Director Anderson reported the joi.nr g _
------------
wers
ment with the City of New' Brighton had beenccompleted
e
fnr the puppet wagon program, with a third staff person
being added. He also reported that a childrens theater
program had been started, with 30 children participating.
Park Director Anderson reported the softball program
was a huge -success, with over 100 teams participating,
and they plan on the two additional fields at Silver
View Park to help with the crowded schedule, but with
the possibility of losing the two fields at Red Oak
School.
Park Director Anderson reported that Phase I at Silver
View Park is almost complete, with the project being
approximately $7,000 under budget to date. He also
reported they hope the reseeding will take off soon.
Park Director Anderson four park shelter buildings
were removed, and a new one built at Lambert Park,
with three new buildings having been Durchased
recently.
He also reported that the City had saved approxi-
mately $16,000 through the use of CETA employees,
and they are feeling the benefit of having Larry
Decheine working on the park maintenance,
He also reported over 900 trees had been planted
to date, with 22 being stolen, and 230 trees being
that
vsomesOf trees/had2due to diesease.
6een translHe added
panted
to be doing well. , and seem
Director Johnson reported the street department
made three major repairs during the third quarter,
and attempted to repair the storm sewer problem,
and completed the seal coating. He added that
Lift Station #3 had a burned out motor which
was repaired, aswellas the rnnr tra�3L111ent
control oii,g completed.
Director Johnson reported the I&I field study
work was completed, with th a report due shortly.
He also reported a stolen fire hydrant had been
replaced, and the flushing of water mains was
completed, with the water being very dark and
rusty. He added they had started the servicing
and painting program for the fire hydrants, and
are 25% complete.
Director Johnson reported they are preparing bids
for the complete servicing of Well #5, and have ,
completed 192 meter services and inspections.
,Mounds View City Council IJ�u October 11 1982
Regular Meeting---------- 4 ,45. A;. Page Nine
--------------- �: i. � -------------------
,.J�e also gave a summary of applications processed by
?c rnmmmi_nity Development Department and reported
-hat they have completed the implementation of the
wetlands ordinance and are now working on the flood
plain ordinance.
Motion!Second: Doty/Blanchard to approve the first 9. Approval of Firs
reading Ordinance No. 321, amending the municipal Reading of Ord.
code of the City of Mounds View by creating Chapter No. 321 Amending
49, "Flood Plain Zoning Ordinance', and waive the the Municipal
reading of the ordinance, making it available at Code of the City
City Hall for review by residents. of Mounds View b
Creating Chapter
5 ayes 0 nays 49, "Flood Plain
Ordinance"
Motion Carried
Attorney Meyers reported he has read the proposed
ordinance and finds there may be some overlap
between the flood plain ordinance and wetland
ordinance, and gave an example from page 6.
Director Johnson responded that the two ordinances
,,--,ere worked in tandem, and while he feels they are
)nsistent, he cannot guarantee it.
Motion/Second: McCarty/Doty to authorize Attorney
Meyers and Staff to compare Chapters 49 and 48 and
report back any inconsistencies.
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Director Johnson was directed to forward the pro-
posed ordinance to the DNR for their review,
since their comments must be received before the
second reading.
It was noted that this item was discussed earlier 10. Review of Lette
in the meeting and wil.i be placed on the agenda to Past Due
for discussion at a future agenda session. Utility and Tree
Removal Accounts
Park Director Anderson reported they had received 11. Consideration of
the purchase agreement from Ernst Movers, and they Staff Memo Regar,
are ready to go. He reported the most difficult ing Park Shelter
issue has been trying to locate the buildings at Buildings
each park, with the final decision of the Park
mmission being to go with the Master Plan, even
,ough that may not be the most convenient location
at each park presently. He reviewed the proposed
locations for the Council and stated they would
put up maps in each building, showing the Master
Mounds View City
Regular Meeting
Council
;�� J„ ,;;t r $�j
{i d-
October 11 1982
Page Ten
--------------------------------
----
_--Q-L
i r-JL fed
------------------
Plan so the residents
would understand
why the build-
ings were located where they were. He added they
will be coming in under budget, and all three build-
ings will be ready no later than December 1.
There was discussion regarding payment of fees for
building permits, and the qu:stion was raised who
would pay the highway permit fees for moving the
buildings. Park Director Anderson was directed to
check into those fees, and it was pointed out the
Council had not signed the purchase agreement yet,
in which those fees are assigned.
Motion/Second: Blanchard/Hodges to rescind the
ees or t e building permits for the three park
shelter buildings, but they must still retain
the requirements.
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Attorney Meyers stated he would meet with Park
Director Anderson and Mr. Ernst on October 13
and work out an understanding on the fees.
Park Director Anderson reviewed the recommendation 12. Considerati
,912
from the Park and Rec Commission, endorsing the Staff Memo
program in the City. ing Golden G
Boxing Program
Mayor McCarty stated he was concerned with the
City being held liable for any injuries. Park
Director Anderson replied that the Golden Gloves
sponsors are willing to enter into an agreement
with the City to hold them harmless for any
liability. Attorney Meyers recommended they
should also file a certificate of insurance.
Motion/Second: McCarty/Doty to endorse the Golden
oyes oxine orosram at the Edgewood Community
Resources Center, contingent upon receipt of the
hold -harmless agreement in favor of the City and
endorsement upon any insurance Golden Gloves may
have in the case of a lawsuit, referring to
liability.
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Motion/Second: Blanchard/Forslund to amend the
previous motion to include that there will be a
six month trial period.
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carr
Mdunds View City Council a + ��� r. -'•% = 1 {' l�'' October 11, 1982
Regular Meeting I Page Eleven
-------------------------- -----------------------------------------------
ark Director Anderson explained he would like to 13. Consideration of
ake time off, with pay, to attend the National Park, Recreation
.recreation and Park Association Congress, at his and Forestry
own personal expense, and would require 3 days. Director Anderso
Request for Time
Mayor McCarty replied that Staff members are to Off with Pay to
be granted compensation in time off for the extra Attend the 1982
hours they put in, and recommended Mr. Anderson National Recrea-
use his comp time, and stated no action was tion and Park
required since it was an administrative matter. Association Cong
Motion/Second: McCarty/Blanchard to authorize
the City to receive the free fill from the property
at 5071 Bona Road.
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Director Johnson reported they have serviced 192 14. Report of Direc-
meters and found a high percentage of unaccurate for of Public
readings. He added a more detailed report would Works/Community
be prepared at the end of the study, but explained Development
the problem area has been identified as a batch of
300 meters, and asked approval to install 50 Rock-
well meters from the supply to replace 50 of the
--erroneous meters, at a cost of approximately
2,250.
Motion/Second: McCarty/Blanchard to authorize
t e reassignment of $2,250 in the Water 700,
Material and Supply account, to purchase water
meters.
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Director Johnson reported a second bid had been
received for the sewer break on County Road H,
and the problem appears to be much more expensive
than was originally estimated. He noted the low
.
vauuoa �.a reauy tii atait Ilw_ucti,l Gl.CLy UpUll 8WdIU
of the contract.
Motion/Second: McCarty/Forslund to authorize Staff
to raw rom the SWM fund a maximum of $7,700, of
which $6,840 will be paid to Dawson Construction,
Inc. for repair of the storm sewer system on
County Road H, east of Bona Road.
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
.Director Johnson reported that the motor from Lift
Cation #3 had failed and is being repaired, and
_,.t was brought to his attention that the equipment
may be needing servicing in the future. He added
he would have more information for them later.
*, r I
Mounds View City Council � � ����� � UVED October 11, 1982
Regular Meeting Page Twelve
Director Johnson reported the Long Lake Road ditch
repair contract has not been completed yet, with
the contractor being very overdue on his completion
date, and after speaking with Attorney Meyers, was
planning to send a letter to the contractor advising
him he is responsible for all costs.
Director Johnson reported he had received a letter
from Pat Allen at Gunnar Isberg and Associates,
clarifying her letter of October 1. He added
Ms. Allen would like to attend the October 18 agenda
meeting and address the Council. It was agreed
that Ms. Allen could meet with the Council on the
18th, but would be limited to 30 minutes, do to
the lengthy agenda, and could set an alternate date
if she desired more than 30 minutes.
Attorney Meyers reported he had xeceived a copy of
a memo regarding the airport operators meeting, and
he has been asked for his opinion regarding the
VASI which is proposed. He explained he is research-
ing it with Mr. Karney, and it does not appear to
be allowable, but is checking further with the FAA.
15. Report of
r_
Councilmember Forslund reported the Planning Commis- 16. Reports of
sion has finished their review on the home occu- Councilmembe,s
pations ordinance and will be forwarding it to the
Council shortly, as well as Chapter 42.
Councilmember Blanchard had no report.
Councilmember Doty had no report.
Councilmember Hodges had no report.
Mayor McCarty had no report.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley had no report.
Motion/Second: Doty/Blanchard to adjourn the
meet ng atZ6:23 PM.
5 ayes 0 nays
Respectfully submitted,
Donald F. Pauley
Clerk/Administrator
17. Report of
Administrator
18, Adjournment
Motion Carried
L:I
DATE APPROVED: 10/11/82
PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA
VED
Regular Meeting
September 27, 1982
Mounds View City Hall
2401 Hwy, 10, Mounds View, MN 55112
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Mounds View City Council was called to order by 1. Call to Order
Mayor McCarty at 7:30 PM on September 27, 1982.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Councilmembers Hodges, Forslund, 2. Roll Call
Blanchard, Doty and Mayor McCarty.
ALSO PRESENT: City Attorney Meyers, Clerk/
A inistrator Pauley and Public Works/Community
Development Director Johnson.
Motion/Second: Doty/Forslund to approve the Septem- 3. Approval of
ber 13, 1982' minutes as presented. Minutes:
September 13, 19
5 ayes 0 nays and September
20, 1982
Motion Carried
Motion/Second: Doty/Hodges to approve the September
minutes as presented.
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
There were no residents requests or comments from 4. Residents
the floor. Requests and
Comments from
the YluuL
It was noted that Item A should be September 30, 5. Approval of the
rather than September 27. Consent Agenda
Motion/Second: Forslund/Blanchard to approve the
consentageen a and waive the reading of the resolu-
tions.
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Director Johnson updated the Council on the condi-
ton of the water a resident had brought in earlier
a the evening. He reported it definitely was very
cloudy and dark, and appeared undrinkable. He
stated he had spoken with the Public Works Foreman,
who explained that the valves had been closed on
Mounds View City Council September 27, 1982
Regular Meeting Page Two '
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lois Drive that afternoon, in preparation for flushing
the next morning, which was contributing to the pro-
blem. He added that it would not be feasible to have
a crew come out this evening to work on the problem,
as tl:ey would just be undoing the work the crew had
done that afternoon.
Motion/Second: Forslund/Blanchard to approve and 6. Second Reading
a opt r finance No. 316, Amending Municipal Code and Adoption of
Chapter 40 Regarding Manufacturered Homes, and Ord. No. 316
waive the reading. Amending Munici;
Code Chapter 40
Councilmember Hodges - aye Regarding Manu-
Councilmember Forslund - aye factured Homes
Councilmember Blanchard - aye
Councilmember Doty - aye
Mayor McCarty - aye Motion Carried
Councilmember Forslund reported the Planning 7. First Reading
Commission has recommended approval of the third Ordinance No.
draft of Chapter 48, with their Resolution No. Establishing C';
60-82. pter 48 of the
Municipal Code
Motion/Second: McCarty/Hodges to have the first Entitled ',W,
rea ing o Ordinance No. 318 creating Chapter 48, Zoning"
Wetlands Zoning Ordinance, and waive the reading.
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
It was noted that the ordinance would be available
at City Hall for review, and that it would be
discussed in detail at the second reading.
Motion/Second: McCarty/Hodges to set a public hear-
ing on ordinance No. 318 on October 11, 1982 at 7:40
PM.
ay--. 0 nays Motion Carried
Mayor McCarty closed the regular meeting and opened 8A. Public Hearing -
the first public hearing at 7:44 PM. 1983 Revenue
Sharing Budget
Finance Director Brager reviewed the pxoposed 1983
revenue sharing budget.
There were no questions or comments from the
audience.
Mayor McCarty closed the public hearing and reopened
the regular meeting at 7:54 PM.
Mounds View City Council
Regulaz Meeting
-----------------------------------------
lotion/Second: McCarty/Forslund to approve and
1 opt Resolution No. 1498 and waive the reading.
5 ayes 0 nays
September 27, 1982
Page Three
--------------------------
Mayor McCarty closed the regular meeting and opened
the public hearing at 7:55 PM.
Finance Director Brager reviewed the proposed 1983
general fund budget.
There were no comments from the audience.
Mayor McCarty closed the public hearing and reopened
the regular meeting at 8:07 PM.
Mayor McCarty thanked Staff for the tremendous job
they had done on the budget, He explained the Council
had decided to begin the process of building a reserve
for the general fund as a hedge against a loss of
revenue from the State in the future.
Motion/Second: McCarty/Doty to readjust the contin-
ency 00-120-4910 down $7,994.
i ayes 0 nays
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported that would change
the general fund 180, Maintenance Garage, to $55,086,
and the contingency to $24,000 and the fund general
balance to $22,994.
Motion/Second: Hodges/Blanchard to approve Reso-
ution No. 99 and waive the reading, as amended
5 ayes 0 nays
Motion/Second: Fors lund/ Blanchard to approve Reso-
lution N�00 and waive the reading.
5 ayes 0 nays
Motion/Second: Doty/Forslund to approve Resolution
1, 1501 and waive the reading.
ayes 0 nays
9. Consideration o
the 1983 Revenu
Sharing Budget
Motion Carried
8B. Public Hearing
1983 General
Fund Budget
Motion Carried
10. Consideration
of the 1983 Gen
eral Fund Budge
Motion Carried
11. Consideration o
the 1983 Genera
and Forestry Fm
Tax Levies
Motion Carried
12. Consideration o
the 1933 Bond ai
Interest Tax Le,
Motion Carried
Mounds View City Cu.::;,;il September 27, 1982
Regular Meeting Page Four
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mor:on/Second: Doty/Blanchard to approve Resolution 13. Considerat'llof
N1 95, denying the development request of Dynamic Rslt. No. .
signers and waive the reading. Denying Deve op-
ment Request by
5 ayes 0 nays Dynamic Designer
Motion Carried
Motion/Second: McCarty/Doty to remove the item from 14. Consideration of
the tam— Application for
Restaurant Licen
5 ayes 0 nays and On -Sale
Liquor License
Transfer from
Richard and
Marlene Povlitzk
dba Povlitzki's
on 10 to Donald
W. Baker, Joseph
M. Baker, and
Patrick A. Conro
Jr./dba Gopher -
Shamrock, Inc.
Motion Car
Attorney Feyers asked if Donald W. Baker, Joseph M.
Baker and Patrick A. Conroy, Jr. were present. They
responded that they were.
Donald Baker stated they had no further information
to provide to the City.
Councilmember Doty asked if the City is required to
transfer liquor licenses upon request. Attorney
Meyers replied that a transfer does not present the
same situation as granting a license, but they
consider the potential transfer. He added this
would be handled the same as the transfer of any
license.
Motion: Doty to not consider the transfer of
the license at this time.
There were no second to the motion.
Mayor McCarty stated they had been through a
difficult time with this issue.
Motion/Second: McCarty/Doty to deny the application to
or cenae transfer from Richard and Marlene
Povlitzki to Donald W. Baker, Joseph M. Baker and
Patrick A. Conroy, Jr.
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Mounds View City Council September 27, 1982
•Regular Meeting Page Five
--------------------------------------------•-•----------------
erk/Administrator Pauley reported the City had 15. Consideration o
r ceived a petition for two streetlights on Pine- Pinewood Drive
eood between Quincy and 35W, and after meeting with Streetlight
NSP, it was determined the suggested locations would Petition
not work, and two alternatives were suggested by NSP.
Motion/Second: Forslund/Hodges to grand the request
or sty reetlights on Pinewood Drive, between 2127 and
2119, and between 2085 and 2077.
5 ayes 0 nays
Motion Carried
Director Johnson brought to the Council's attention
16. Report of Dir-
that his contract with them expires on October 9,
and presented them with an amendment, extending it
ector of Public
to the end of the year.
Works/Community
Development
Mayor McCarty stated they would like time to review
it in order to look at funding. Directur Johnson
asked what he should do if he reaches 700 hours be-
fore the next meeting. The Council assured him that
they would be renewing the contract.
Motion/Second: McCarty/Blanchard to continue the
^�.ubject of the Public Works/Community
evelopment Director's contract until the next
--agenda session on October 4, 1982.
5 ayes 0 nays
Motion Carried
Motior./Second: McCarty/Hodges to set a special
meeting on October 4, 1982 to deal with the pro-
fessional services contract for the Director of
Public Works/Community Development.
5 ayes 0 nays
Motion Carried
Director Johnson reported that Mr. Hanggi had made
the statement that the quality of water he is
seeing presently is the worst it has even been since
he has worked for Mounds View.
Motion/Second: McCarty/Doty to authorize Staff to
imme late y call a squad car and send bottled spring
water to the resident, and charge to the contingency
account.
-
5 ayes 0 nays
Motion Carried
council took a 15 minute break while Director Johnson
id Councilmember Doty purchased spring water an- took
.0 to the resident.
Finance Director Brager presented the Council with a
proposed resolution, levying a tax for delinquent
utility charges over a one year period.
Mounds View City Council September 27, 1982
Regular Meeting Page Six
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In response to questioning, Finance Director Brager
stated there were delinquencies other than utilities
that were owed the City.
Motion/Second: McCarty/Hodges to receive Resolution
Nana table action on the resolution until
such time as each individual listed has received a
letter from the City, notifying them that the City
Council will consider levyinq unpaid utility bills
on real estate taxes, in addition to other options,
at an October 9, 1982 special meeting.
5 ayes 0 nays
Motion Carried
Motion/Second: McCarty/Hodges that it be the policy
o the a Council to direct Staff that residents and all
others that are indebted to the City be notified by
letter before delinquencies are attached to their
real estate taxes for payment.
5 ayes 0 nays
Motion Carried
Motion/Second: Forslund/Blanchard to add Resolution
No. as an item for discussion at the special
meeting on October 4, 1982.
r
5 ayes 0 nays
I
Motion Carried
Director Johnson asked for approval of the Silver Lake
Woods reapportionment. Attorney Meyers explained that
it is an existing assessment, and is just being
divided up differently.
Motion/Second: McCarty/Blanchard to approve Resolu-
tion— s- aT—T489, 1490 and 1491 and waive the reading.
5 ayes 0 nays
Motion Carried
Director Johnson reported he had received a memo from
Mr. Rose, explaining how soil testing is done, which
he will send to the Wetlands Committee.
Director Johnson reported he had received a letter from
Evan Green at MnDOT regarding the City's participation
in a traffic signal, and he would like to come in and
address the Council at an agenda session, to explain
the course of action that is being taken by MnDOT.
Director Johnson also reported that Spring Lake Park
is settlign a public hearing on the signal.
s
Attorney Meyers reported he had received information 17, Report of
on the cable tv, and it appears the final documents Attorney
are being submitted to the Cities for action. He
added that under Chapter 10 o� the Charter, they must
Mounds View City Council September 27, 1982
Regular Meeting Page Seven
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
ake procedural steps before approving a franchise.
also stated that the City should address having
1 facility in the maintenance building.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported he had had several
discussions with the people connected to the cable tv,
and in order to provide adequate public notice, the
newsletter could be sent out early, Clerk/Administrator
Pauley outlined the tentative schedule.
Motion/Second: McCarty/Doty to arrange to have the
October 25, 1982 regular Council meeting at the Edgewood
Community Resource Center, in the theater, for a public
hearing on cable television, at 7:30 PM, with the
regular Council meeting to follow the hearing, at the
same location.
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Motion/Second: Doty/Blanchard to direct Staff to
request that the maintenance building be included in
the hook-ups,
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
,,..Sttorney Meyers reported he had sent a memo to the
')uncil regarding the Rochester Association case,
.,--.43.th the Comprehensive Plan versus Zoning, and it
was held that the zoning regulations control use of
the property ip the City.
Director Johnson reported he and Staff are as ready
as possible on the Wetlands Ordinance.
Councilmember Hodges had no report. 18. Reports of
Councilmembers
Councilmember Forslund reminded everyone to get out
and vote on the school bond issue on October 5.
Councilmember Blanchard had no report.
Councilmember Doty reported he had missed the Park
Board meeting the previous week.
Councilmember Doty stated he had had an article for
the newsletter edited, and in the future would expect
no editing would be done without the prior approval
of the writter.
Mayor McCarty reported they must begin the process of
,king the necessary amendments to Chapter 50, regard-
ig the Lakeside Park Commission. Clerk/Administrator
lauley replied that he would have Park Director Anderson
prepare a proposed amendment.
Mounds View City u,ci' September 27, 1982
Regular Meeting 'rage Eight
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mayor McCarty reported he had spoken to the chairman
of the Festivities Commission, and they have requested
a joint meeting of the Council and Festivities Commission
on October 5 at 7:30 PM, to discuss Mounds View's 25th
anniversary.
Mayor McCarty reported that he had been requested to
have copies available to candidates for Council of the
budget which had just been adopted. He stated those
copies would be available at City Hall.
Mayor McCarty reported that Spring Lake Park has autho-
rized money to the Lakeside Park Commission to offer
as a reward for information to lead to the arrest and
conviction of the vandals who set fire to the shelter
building, and recommended Mounds View support it also.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported that Mr. Ernst
has accepted the City's offer to purchase three
buildings for $15,000.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported problems had
been experienced with vandals at Lambert Park over
the weekend. Mayor McCarty recommended letters be
sent to residents who have been active in that area,
asking for their help.
Motion/Second: McCarty/Blanchard that the Council
a opt a po icy that all acts of vandalism or theft
within the City, as supported by evidence within
their judgement, be arrests and not warnings.
5 ayes 0 nays
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported the attorney
representing the Millers had given him a handout for
the Council. He stated he would place the item on
the agenda for the next agenda session.
Motion/Second: Blanchard/Doty to adjourn the
meeting at :50 PM.
5 ayes 0 nays
19
20
Report of
Clerk/Adm
for
Motion Carried
Adjournment
Motion Carried
•
DATE APPROVED: 10/11/8:
PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
/Ir\ CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
j RAMSEY LINTY, MINNESOTA
Ai"
,
iv- Special Meeting
6 �; ? v �. October 4, 1982
Ai,,
1 Mounds View City Iiall
2401 Hwy. 10, Mounds View City Hall
------------------------------------------------------------------
The Mounds View City Council was called 1. CALL TO ORDER
to order at 7:07 p.m. on October 4, 1982
by Mayor McCarty.
Members present: Forsiund, Blanchard,
2. ROLL CALL
Doty, Hodges, McCarty
Others Present: Clerk/Administrator
Pauley, Director of Public Works/
Community Development Johnson, and
Finance Director Brager.
The Council entered into a lengthy
3. RESOLUTION NO. 1502
discussion regarding Resolution No. 1502
LEVYING A TAX FOR
Levying a Tax for Delinquent Utility Bill
DELINQUENT UTILITY
and Tree Removal Charges Over a One
BILL AND TREE REMOVAL
Year Period and the methods practiced
CHARGES OVER A ONE
by the City in attempting to collect
YEAR PERIOD
delinquent utility bills before levying
them on the property taxes, as well as
other City charges, such as, administra-
tive charges and insufficient fund check
charges.
Motion/Second: McCarty/Doty to direct
staff to send a letter to property
owners having delinquent utility bills
or tree removal charges advising them
that there was an error in the letter
dated September 29, 1982 and that it is
not the City council's intent to levy
these charges on the property taxes
without alternatives for installment
payment or payment in full first being
offered.
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
The Council directed staff to draft
a letter for their approval to go to
these property owners which would also
mention the availability for County
assistance where financial hardship
exists. Staff indicated that they
would submit a proposed policy to the
Council for their consideration regarding
Mounds View City Council
Special Meeting
------------------------------
the collection of past due utility bills,
administrative fees, tree removal charges,
and insufficient fund check charges.
Council -reviewed a proposed amendment to
the contract with John Johnson for
professional services, increasing the
current contract by 360 hours or $8,100,
and a memorandum from the Finance Director
indicating possible funding sources for
this contract amendment.
Motion/second: McCarty/Doty to amend
the contract with John Johnson for
professional services to include an
additional 360 hours to be funded
per the recommendations contained in
a memorandum from Finance Director -
Treasurer Brager dated September 30,
1982.
5 ayes 0 nays
Motion/Second: Forslund/Blanchard to
adjourn at 7:50 p.m.
October 9, 1982
Page Two10
---------------
9. AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT
WITH JOHN JOHNSON
FOR PROFESSIONAL
SERVICES
5. ADJOURNMENT
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
/ 9
r�
U