Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Agenda Packets - 1982/10/25
CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW f Edgewood Community Resource Center - Room 203 October 25, 1982 7:30 p.m. A G N D A 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call - Forslund, Blanchard, Doty, Hodges, McCarty 3. Approval of Minutes: October 11, 1982 (Regular Meeting) - Received in your 10/18/82 packet. October 18, 1982 (Special Meeting) 4. Public Hearing - 7:30 p.m. - Cable TV Public Hearing 5. Residents Requests and Comments from the Floor ------------------------------------------------ CITIZENS: BEFORE SPEAKING PLEASE GIVE YOUR FULL NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE MINUTES ------------------------------------------------ 6. Approval of Consent Agenda ITEM A. Set Canvassing Board Meeting for 7:00 p.m., November 3, 1982 ITEM B. Set Special Council Meeting for 7:00 p.m., October 26, 1982 ITEM C. Set Utility Budget and Rate Public Hearing for 7:40 p.m., November 22, 1982 i i ITEM D. Set Public Hearing for Rezoning of First State Bank of New Brighton Property from B-3 to B-2 at 7:40 p.m., November 8, 1982 i ITEM E. Set Public Hearing to Consider Ordinance No. 322 Amending Chapter 40 of the Municipal Code Regarding Home Occupations at 7:50 p.m., November 8, 1982 ITEM F. Set Public Hearing to Consider Ordinance No. 323 Amending Chapter 42 of the Municipal Code at 81.00 p.m., November 8, 1982 ITEM G. Set Public Hearing for Subdivision and Rezoning of 8495 Red Oak Drive at 8:10 p.m., November 8, 1982 ITEM H. Set Public Hearing for Relocation of Building Request for 7911 Spring Lake Road at 8:20 p.m., November 8, 1982 -continued- AGENDA October 25, 1982 Page Two 6. 1pproval of Consent Agenda (cont.) ITEM I. Approve Resolution No. 1506 Endorsing the Groveland Park Foundation Concept of Volunteering as Winter Skating Attendants at Groveland Park ITEM J. Accept Promissory Note of Mounds View Country Inn, Inc., in the Amount of $4,325.20 for Delinquent Utility Charges ITEM K. Licenses for Approval ITEM L. Approve Resolution No. 1509 Approving Just and Correct Claims Against City Funds 7. First Reading of Ordinance No. 319, An Ordinance, Including Addendum With Exhibits, Granting A Franchise to Group W Cable of the North Suburbs, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation, To Operate and Maintain a Cable Communication System in the City; Setting Forth Conditions Accompanying the Grant of Franchise; Providing for Regulation, and Use of the System; and Prescribing Penalties for the Violation of Its Provisions B. First Reading of Ordinance No. 326 Amending the Municipal Code of Mounds View by Amending Chapter 107, Entitled "Bingo" � 4 9. Third Quarter Department- Head Report - Police Chief Grabowski 10. Consideration of Resolution No. 1507 Requesting Ramsey County Implement Public Safety Actions Upon Request of City Council Only 11. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding the 1983 Specifica- tions for the City Newsletter 12. First Reading of Ordinance No. 320 Amendinq the Municipal Code of Mounds View by Amending Chapter 26, Entitled "Public Improvements" 13. Report of Director of Public Works/Community Development 14. Report of Attorney 15. Report of Councilmembers 16. Report of Administrator 17. Adjournment 4 PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA Special Mectinq October. 18, 1982 4 Mounds View City Hall 2401 Hwy. 10, Mounds View City Hall ---------------------------------------------------------------------- The Mounds View City Council was called 1. CALL TO ORDER to order at 8:00 p.m. on October 18, 1982 by Mayor McCarty. Members present: Hodges, Forslunds, 2. ROLL CALL Blanch ard, Doty, McCarty Others resent: Clerk/Administrator Pauley, Pu lie Works/Community Develop- ment Director Johnson, Finance Director Brager, Director of Parks, Recreation & Forestry Anderson, and Public Works Foreman Kardell. Mayor McCarty presented a draft of a 3. PARKING ON letter and accompanying resolution COUNTY ROAD I previously adopted by the Ramsey County AND GREENFIELD Board of Commissioners regarding the AVENUE parking situation on County Road I and Greenfield Avenue. Mayor McCarty indicated that he felt that the situation had been mishandled in that a staff member had indicated to Ramsey County that it was the desire of the City that parking be prohibited on County Road I between Long Lake Road and Jackson Drive when the matter had not been presented to the Planning Commission or City Council for consideration. Also, he indicated that he felt that all requests for designation of no parkina shnnld be cu1.311antiated to justify such requests. Motion/Second: McCarty/Doty to direct t at tTi —he letter in exact verbage presented by Mayor McCarty on October 18, 1982 be sent to the apartment building complex owners or mangers and a resolution be presented for Council consideration indicating to Ramsey County that requests for actions regarding public safety be implemented through resolu- tion of the governing body. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Mounds View City Council special Meeting ------------------------------------------ Motion/Second: McCarty/Doty that the staff member responsible for request to Ramsey County have a letter of reprimand placed in their personnel file for acting without proper authority, to be removed from the Jile after six months if there are no further violations by the staff member. Further violations will be met by suspension without pay under Section 6.13 of the Personnel Code, suspension terms to be determined by the Council. 4 ayes 1 nay Motion/Second: Doty/Hodges to adjourn at 8:19 p.m. 5 ayes 0 nays : October 18, 1982 Page Two ------------------- ,9 Respectfully submitted, Donald F. Paulay Clerk -Administrator Motion Carried Motion Carried 0 11 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING 04 FOR CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE NO. 319 GRANTING A FRANCHISE TO OPERATE A CABLE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM IN THE CITY NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Mounds View City Council will meet on Monday, October 25, 1982, at 7:30 p.m. at the Edgewood Community Resource Center, Room 203, 5100 North Edgewood Drive, Mounds View, Minnesota 55112, to consider proposed Ordinance No. 319, Grantinq a Franchise to Group W Cable of the North Suburbs, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation, to Operate and Maintain a Cable Communication System in the City; Setting Forth Conditions Accompanying the Grant of Franchise; Providing for Regulation, and Use of the System; and Prescribing Penalties of the Violation of Its Provisions. Copies of the ordinance are available at the office of the Clerk -Administrator for review or purchase. All persons who wish to be heard regarding this matter will be heard at that time. Donald F. Pauley Clerk -Administrator (Bulletin: Oct. 7, 1982) CABLE T.V. PUBLIC HEARING ON MONDAY, OCTOBER 25, 1982 THE MOUNDS VIEW CITY COUNCIL WILL BE HOLDING A PUBLIC HEARING ON A PROPOSED CABLE T.V. FRANCHISE ORDINANCE AT 7:30 P.M. IN THE EDGEWOOD COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER THEATRE, ROOM 203. THE COUNCIL WILL ALSO CONDUCT THEIR REGULAR MEETING FOR THAT EVENING AT THE SAME LOCATION AFTER THE HEARING IS COMPLETED. A PROPOSED CABLE T.V. FRANCHISE ORDINANCE HAS BEEN PRESENTED TO THE CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW AND NINE OTHER MEMBER CITIES OF THE NORTH SUB- URBAN CABLE COMMISSION. THE ORDINANCE OUTLINES THE TYPE OF CABLE T.V. SYSTEM TO BE FROVIAD TO THE NORTH SUBURBAN AREA BY GROUP W (FORMERLY KNOWN AS TELEPROMPTER) AND THE DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF THAT ORGANIZATION OVER THE TERM OF THE FRANCHISE. ALL INTERESTED MOUNDS VIEW RESIDENTS ARE ENCOURAGED TO ATTEND THIS HEARING WHERE A FORMAL PRESENTATION OF THE PLANNED CABLE T.V. SYSTEM WILL BE MADE BY REPRESENTATIVES OF GROUP W AND OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC COMMENT WILL BE GIVEN. IF YOU ARE INTERESTED IN THE FRANCHISE ORD- INANCE, YOU MAY REVIEW A COPY OF IT AT THE CLERK -ADMINISTRATOR'S OFFICE, MOUNDS VIEW CITY HALL OR PURCHASE A COPY FOR A MINIMAL FEE. CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW 2401 HIGHWAY 10 ST. PAUL, MN 55112 POSTAL PATRON Cu:M Nate a s postage PAID peunn no 4408 ! st Paul. mnn. u e 6 CONSENT AGENDA October 25, 1982 The Consent Agenda is a technique designed to expedite handling of routine and miscellaneous official business of the City Council. The entire Agenda may be adopted by the Council in one motion. The motion for adoption is non -debatable and must receive unanimous approval. By request of any individual Councilmember, any item can be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed upon the Regular Agenda for debate. ITEM A. Set Canvassing Board Meeting for 7:00 p.m., November 3, 1982 ITEM B. Set Special Council Meeting for 7:00 p.m., October 26, 1982 ITEM C. Set Utility Budget and Rate Public Hearing for 7:40 p.m., November 22, 1982 ITEM D. Set Public Hearing for Rezoning of First State Bank of New Brighton Property from B-3 to 13-2 at 7:40 p.m., November 8, 1982 ITEM E. Set Public Hearing to Consider Ordinance No. 322 Amending Chapter 40 of the Municipal Code Regarding dome Occupations at 7:50 p.m., November 8, 1982 �^ ITEM F. Set Public Hearing to Consider Ordinance No. 323 Amending i Chapter 42 of the Municipal Code at 8:00 p.m., November 8, 1982 ITEM G. Set Public Hearing for Subdivision and Rezoning of 8495 Red Oak Drive at 8:10 p.m., November 8, 1982 ITEM H. Set Public Hearing for Relocation of Building Request for 7911 Spring Lake Road at 8:20 p.m., November 8, 1982 ITEM I. Adopt Resolution No. 1506 - Endorsing the Groveland Park Foundation Concept of Volunteering as Winter Skating Attendants at Groveland Park ITEM J. Accept Promissory Note of Mounds View Country Inn, Inc., in the Amount of $4,325.20 for Delinquent Utility Charges ITEM K. Licenses for Approval General - Expire 6/30/82 Dalberg Builders, Inc. - New Remington Builders, Inc. - New Wooddale Builders, Inc. - New " Heating E Air Conditioning - Expire 6/30/83 M. M. Peaslee Co. New -continued- CONSENT AGENDA October 25, 1982 page Two ITEM K. Licenses for Approval (cont.) Restaurant - Expire 6/30/83 'Mounds View Country Inn - New Sewer & Water - Expire 6/30/83 M. M, peaslee Co. Waalen & Sabby, Inc. - New Hank Weidema Excavating, Inc. - Renewal sign & Billboard - Expire 6/30/83 Macey signs - Renewal ITEM L. Adopt Resolution No. 1509 - Approving Just and Correct Claims Against City Funds u Wi CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA NOTICE OF PUBLIC NEARING FOR REZONING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Council of the City of Mounds View will meet at 7:40 p.m. on Monday, November 8, 1982 at. the City Hall, 2401 Highway 10, Mounds View, Minne- sota, 55112, to consider the rezoning from B-3 (Iiighway Business District) to B-2 (Limited Business District) of 2711 Highway 10. Legal description known as: Spring Lake Park Hillview Lots 108, 109, 110 and 111 Anyone desiring to be heard with reference to this matter may be heard at this meating. (Bulletin: October 28, 1982) Donald F. Pauley Clerk -Administrator U&0�b (� MEMO TO: Clerk -Administrator and City Council FROM: Engineering/Planning Technician V,�- DATE: October 21, 1982 SUBJECT: HOME OCCUPATION CODE AMENDMENT Attached with this memo are Planning Commission minutes of October 6th and Resolution No. 62-82 recommending the amending of the Home Occupation Section of the Zoning Code (Chapter 40), in addition to Ordinance No. 322. The basic stand the Planning Commission has taken in revising this section of the Code is to allow a vast array of home occupations as long as the occupation is secondary to the use of the dwelling and does not negatively impact the surrounding neighborhood.. The Planning Commission is recommending that this section of the Zoning Code be adopted immediately to prevent any undesirable home occupation situations. The setting of the public hearing for this item will be placed on this upcoming Agenda with the hearing set for November 8, 1982. Should you need any additional information or have any questions, please contact me. FJK/bc Attachments Mounds View Planning Cotmnission October 6, 1982 Regular Mecting Page Three ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Moc_i.on/Second: McCarthy/Anderson to direct Staff ^ to Curlier nvcsligacc pos::ible land misuse. 6 ayes 0 nays '.lotion Carried Technician Kampel reported he had spoken with 8. Home Occupatio Attornte-y'4levers, and it is the Attorney's opinion Review, Recomm that conformance can be required within 90 days, dation to City but compensaLion may be entered into, if it were Council a permiLlcd use IhaL wa:; no longer allowed. There also was discussion of signs chat might he grand - fathered in. Mocion/Second: Anderson/Warren to recommend appnoval-0rlfesoluLion No. 62-82, 6 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Mocion/Second: McCarthy/Linke to forward Reso- lutioi--- No. 6�-82 to the City Council before approval of the October 6, 1982 minuLes. 6 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Chairman Mountin reported the aLtendees at the 9• Chairman's Septcmbcr 15 agenda session were Commissi0ncrs Report Miller, Linke, Anderson, Warren, McCarthy and MouuLin, and Technician Kampel. Attendees at the August 18, 1982 agenda session were Commissioners Anderson, Miller, Linke, Warren, McCarthy and Mountin, and Technician Kampel, Director Johnson, Mayor McCarthy, Council - member Porslund and Neil Loeding. The Cmimissloners reviewed the proposed changen 10. Chapter 42, $ub to Chapter 42. di`•'is io"• Cp - lations Review, Motion/Second: Miller/Anderson to adopt Reso- Recommendation lunionNoT- -82, to City Council 6 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Technician Kampel reported that Evan Green of 11. Discuss Past MnDOT will be attending the October 18 City Council Action Council agenda session, and will discuss the and Next Agenda Pleasantview Drive/Highway 10 signalization. Technician Kampel reported the Police Department had checked into the parking at Greenfield and County 'Road .1, and they felt there was sufficient parking available in the parking lots, even though people were parking in the streets. MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 62-82 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING THE AMENDING OF CHAPTER 40 OF THE MOUNDS VIEW MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING HOME OCCUPATIONS WHEREAS, both the City Attorney and City Council have recommended that the Planning Commission review the City's present Home Occupation section of the Zoning Code; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission sees the need to provide residents with the opportunity to have occupations in the home; and WHEREAS, numerous citizens are presently engaged in Home Occupations; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommends the City regulate Home Occupations so as to maintain the residential character of neighborhoods and avoid incompatibility of uses; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the Home Occupa- tion sections of the codes of various other communities; I NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission recommends the amending of Chapter. 40 of the Mounds View Municipal Code by the following language: (1) Chapter 40.02 Rules and Definitions. Subd. D(50) Home Occupation. Any occupation which is clearly secondary to the main use of the premises as a dwelling and does not change the character thereof. (40.10, Subd. C(3)) (2) Chapter 40.10 R-1, Single Family Residential District. Subd. C The following are permitted accessory uses in an R-1 District: (3) He Occupations. The regulation of home occupa- tions within residential structures is intented to insure that the occupational use is clearly accessory or secondary to the principal dwelling use and that compatability with surrounding resi- dential uses is maintained. No home occupation shall be allowed which: (a) Involves employees other than persons residing on the premises; Mounds View Planning Commission Resolution No. 62-82 Page "1 I- (b) involves alterations or construction features not customarily found in dwellings; (c) has an exterior display or sign in excess of one (1) square foot. Such sign, for indenti- fication purposes only, shallbe located on either the principal structure or garage. Any sign existing prior to December 29, 1972, shall not be enlarged but may be continued at the size and location upon such date except as hereinafter specified, or subsequently amended. Any sign erected after December 29, 1972, but prior to the adoption of this Code shall come into compliance with this section of the Code by April 1, 1983; (d) involves exterior storage of equipment or materials; (c) generates more than two motor vehicles at a time for either off-street or on -street parking; (f) results in violation of the provisions of Chap- ter 90 (Nuisances) of the Municipal Code; and �- (g) involves activity visible from the public streets. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission recommends that the adoption of this Home Occupation section of the Zoning Code occur immediately and not at such time when the remainder of the Chapter becomes adopted. ATTEST: (SEAL) Adopted this 6th day of October, 1982. Chairman Director of Public Works/Community Development \Wool ORDINANCE NO. 322 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA AMENDING THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF MOUNDS VIEW BY AMENDING CHAPTER 40.02, ZONING, RULES AND DEFINITIONS, AND 40.10, ZONING, R-1 STNGLE FAMTLY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT The Council of the City of Mounds View does hereby ordain: SECTION I. Chapter 40.02, Subdivision B(50) is hereby amended to read as follows: (50) Home Occu ation. Any occupation which is clearly secon ary to t e main use of the premises as a dwelling and does not change the character thereof. (40.10, Subdivision C(3).) SECTION II. Chapter 40.10. R-1 Single Family Residential District is hereby amended to read as fellows: Subdivision C. (3) Home Occupations. The regulation of home occupations within residential structures is intended to insure that the occupational use is clearly accessory or secondary to the principal dwelling use and that com- patability with surrounding residential uses is maintained. No home occupation shall be allowed which: (a) Involves employees other than persons residing on the premises; (b) involves alteration or construction features not customarily found in dwellings; (c) has an exterior display or sign in excess of one (1) square foot. Such sign, for identifi- cation purposes only, shall be located on either the principal structure or garage. Any sign existing prior to December 29, 1972, shall not be enlarged but may be continued at the size and location upon such date except as here- inafter specified, or subsequently amended. Any sign erected after December 29, 1972, but prior to the adoption of this Code shall come into compliance with this section of the Code by April 1, 1983; (d) involves exterior storage of equipment or materials; Ordinance No. 322 Page Two (e) generates more than two motor vehicles at a time for either off-street or on -street parking; (f) results in violation of the provisions of Chap- ter 90 (Nuisances) of the Municipal Code; and (g) involves activity visible from the public streets. This Ordinance shall take effect 30 days after the date of its publication, Read by the Council of the City of Mounds View on the 1982. daY of Read and passed by the Council of the City of Mounds View this day of , 1982 ATTEST; (SEAL) Clerk -Administrator APPROVED AS TO FORM; City"At—to rney R MEMO TO: City Council Clerk -Administrator Director of Public Works/Community Development FROM: Engineering/Planning 'Technician DATE: October 21, 1982 SUBJECT: CHAPTER 42 - SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS The Planning Commission at their October 6th regular meeting passed Resolution No. 64-82 regarding subdivision regulations. Since the date of adoption of that resolution, and per the recommenda- tion of the Parks, Recreation & Forestry Director, the Park Fund Dedication section of the Code has been revised. All Planning Commission members have received the updated copies but have not met as a group to officially approve this revision. Chairman Mountin has recommended that we forward this chapter to you at this time for review and possible adoption. The public hearing is being set at this upcoming meeting with the actual public hearing to take place on November 8, 1982. It will be placed on your November 1st Agenda for discussion with staff. _. If you have any questions conerning the above, please contact me. FJK/bc Mounds View Planning Commission October 6, 1982 Regular Meeting Page Three ---------------------------------------------------------------------- notion/Second: McCarthy/Anderson to direct Staff Co urt er investigate possible land misuse. 6 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Technician Kampel reported he had spoken with 8. Nome Occupatioi Attorney -Meyers, and it is the Attorney's opinion Review, Recomm that conformance can be required within 90 days, dation to City but compensation may be entered into, if it were Council a permitted use that was no longer allowed. There also was discussion of signs that might be grand - fathered in. Motion/Second: Anderson/Warren to recommend approval or Resolution No. 62-82. 6 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Motion/Second: McCarthy/Linke to forward Reso- lutio�-82 to the City Council before approval of the October 6, 1982 minutes. 6 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Chairman Mountin reported the attendees at the 9• Chairman's September 15 agenda session were Commissioners Report Miller, Linke, Anderson, Warren, McCarthy and Mountin, and Technician Kampel. Attendees at the August 18, 1982 agenda session were Commissioners Anderson, Miller, Linke, Warren, McCarthy and Mountin, and Technician Kampel, Director Johnson, Mayor McCarthy, Council - member Forslund and Neil Loeding. _« . /,2 c„b The Commissioners reviewed the proposed endures iu. „.e - - to Chapter 42. division Regu- lations Review, ✓Motion/Second: Miller/Anderson to adopt Reso- Recommendation Iutio— T4_6Z . to City Council 6 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Technician Kampel reported that Evan Green of 11. Discuss Past MnDOT will be attending the October 18 City Council Action Council agenda session, and will discuss the and Next Agenda Pleasantview Drive/Highway 10 signalization. Technician Kampel reported the Police Department had checked into the parking at Greenfield and County Road J, and they felt there was sufficient parking available in the parking lots, even though people were parking in the streets. MOUNDl; VII-31 PLANNING C014MISSIOM RI{; OI,IITMN NO. 64-82 CITY OV MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RIiSI)1,11'I'IUI'! RECOMMINUINt; THE AIJUPT10N OF IIEVISEV ('IIAPTER 42 or 'fill' 1• )(11IDS WW MUNICIPAL CODE EN'1')'1'LEU, "SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS" WHEREAS, the Mounds View City Charter requires that the ordinance:; be reviewed at least once every two (2) years; and WIII:Illirl;;, the Mounds View Planning Commission has met and reviewed Chapter 42 entitled, "Subdivision Regulations"; and WIIERJ{A!;, I:ht: Comm.in:;ion, ill light of resent revisions to the Zoning Code and the recommended adoption of a Wetland and Flood Plain Ord.inanco:;, desires to maintain a consistence between theca new/revised ordinances and the subdivision regulations; and 1 W1114IIEA5, nut11usted lanUuage revisions by the City Attorney concerning the Wetlands Ordinance and the Director of Parks, Recreations and Forestry regarding Park Fund Dedication has been invol-poratod in this dl-art; NOW, 'I'llEREFOIiL•', UL .IT RE'SOLVLD that the Mounds View Plan- ning Commission recommends to the City Council the adoption of Chapter 42 entitled, "Subdivision Regulations", a draft being attached to this resolution; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission refers Section 42. "Fees", to the City Council for their recommenda- tion. Adopted this 3rd day of November, 1982. ATTEST: unairman (SEAL) Public Works/Community Development Director I� ORDINANCE NO. 323 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA AMENDING THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW BY AMENDING CHAPTER 42, "SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS" The City Council of the City of Mounds View does hereby ordain: (See attached amendment) Read by the Council of the City of Mounds View on the day �., of , 1982. Read and passed by the Council of the City of Mounds View on this day of , 1982 ATTEST: yor (SEAL) Clerk -Administrator APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney CHAPTER 42 S(RIDIVII;I(JN 11EOULATIONU ' 42.01 PURPOSE AND INTERPRIN-ATION. (1) Each new subdivluiun buCua!uu a permannnt unit in the basic physical ,Eructate of Ihu fuLu:r eonainlLy, a unit to which the future Community will of nuonasity he forced to adhero, Pioco- meal planning of such uubdivinfon, wiLhouL correlation to the Comprehensive Plan, may and ufLun duun bring a disconnucted patch- work of plats and poor circulation of traffic, In order to promote an attractive, urderly, nlable and whuln,;omo community environment, with adequate municipal nurvicou and efficient movement of traffic, any platting, subdivision roarrangemont, dovolopment or improvament of land within the juriadletion of the City of Mounds View shall, in all respects, comply with the requirements of this Chapter. (2) nascd upon authorlLy Provided In M.S. 462.358, Subdivisions 1 through 8 (laws of 1969), every plat of land proposed within tho City of Mounds View shall be submitted to the City Council for roviow and comment before being filed and no Plat of land shall be filed unless and until the same shall be approved by Resolution of the City CUUI1eII- The term "plat of land" for the purpose of this Ordinance shall be (located to include townhouse development, planned unit develop- ments, and any apartment, building, common area or land coming within � the purview of the Minnesota Condominium Act, r (3) In Lhui.r intcrpretatiun and application the Provisions of these Regulations shall be the minimum requirements adopted for the protection of the public health, safety and general welfare. (4) Subdivision of anv Parcel, or Part thereof. that han been as an e s a we 42.02 TERRITORIAL LIMITS Or REGULATIONS AND SCOPE. The rules and regulations governing plats and subdivision of lam shall apply within the corporate limit:; of Mounds View. EXCope in the not apply to any 1 recorded in the of to August 1, 1959, abrogate, .vuu:l or provisions of othe Lho uu Regulations; duod, covenant, or rostrictivel (3) the Municipality I rase of a resubdivision, these Regulations shall of or lots forming a part of subdivision plats Tice of the Register of Deeds of Ramsey County prior nor is it intended by these Regulations to repeal, in any way impair or interfere with: (1) Existing r laws or ordinances except those in conflict with (2) Private restrictions placed upon property be other private agreement which are equal to or more Restrictive covenants running with the land to which s a party, 42.03 42.03 DEFINITIONS. For the purpose of these regulations, the foiiowing terms, —phrases, words and their derivations shall have the meaning given in this section. When not inconsistent with the context, words used in the present tense include the future, words in the plural number include the singular number, and words in the singular number include the plural number. The word "shall" is always mandatory and not merely directory. (1) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN is the official long-range planning guide as adopted and revised from time to time by the Council. (2) COUNCIL is the legally elected Council of the City of Mounds View. (3) EASEMENT is a grant by an owner of land for the specific use of said land by the public generally, or to a person or persons. (4) FINAL PLAT is the final map, drawing or chart on which the subdivider's plan of subdivision is presented to the Council for approval and which, if approved, will be submitted to the County Register of Deeds or Registrar Of Titles. (5) LOT is a parcel or portion of land in a subdivision or plat of land, separated from other parcels or portions by description as on a subdivision or record of survey map or by metes and bounds, for the purpose of sale or lease or separate use thereof. (6) LOT, CORNER is a lot bordered on at least two (2) adjac— ent sides by streets. (7) LOT, DOUBLE FRONTAGE is a lot the opposite ends of which both abut on streets. (8) METES AND BOUA'Gc of la1,DESCRIPTION is the description of parcels d by the use of the notation of distances and directions describing a traverse, and/or the descrip- tion of parts of government sections. quarter sections, or government lots. (9) MINIMUM SUBDIVISION DESIGN STANDARDS are the guides, principles and specifications for the preparation of subdivision plans indicating, among other things, the minimum and maximum dimensions of the various elements set forth in the preliminary plan. (10) MAJOR SUBDIVISION - A subdivision of a parcel or parcels of property in which more than one additional parcel or lot is created, or which is two (2) acres or larger in size. (11) MINOR SUBDIVISION - A subdivision of a parcel or parcels of property, less than two (2) acres in size, in which no more than one additional parcel or lot is created. (12) OWNER is any individual, firm, association, syndicate, co -partnership, corporation, trust or any other legal `+el entity having sufficient legal or equitable interest in the land sought to be subdivided to commence and maintain proceeding to subdivide the same under these regulations. 42.03 (U) PEDESTRIAN WAY is the right-of-way across or within '0(�'t/TTck, for use by pedestrian traffic whether designates as a pedestrian way, crosswalk or however otherwise designated. D (14) PERSON is any individual, firm, association, syndicate or partnership, corporation, trust, or any other legal entity. (15) PLANNING COMMISSION is the duly appointed Planning Commission of Mounds View pursuant to Chapter 32. (16) PLAT is the procedure prescribed in Minnesota Statutes tFapter 505.01 et seq. (17) PRELIMINARY PLAT is the preliminary map, drawing or chart indicating the proposed layout of a major subdivision to be submitted to the Council for their consideration. (18) PROTECTIVE COVENANTS are contracts entered into between private parties and constitute a restriction on the use of all private -property within a subdivision for the benefit of the property owners, and to provide mutual protection against undesirable aspects of development which would tend to impair stability of values. (19) RIGHT-OF-WAY is the width, between property lines, of a road, street, alley, pedestrian way or easement. (20) STREETS AND ALLEYS (a) Street is a way for vehicular traffic, whether de is gnated as a street, highway, thoroughfare, parkway, throughway, road, avenue, lane, place or however otherwise designated. (b) Collector Street is a street which carries traffic from minor streets to thoroughfares. It includes the principal entrance streets of a residential development and streets for circulation within such a development. (c) Cul-de-Sac is a minor street with only one outlet and having a turn -around. (d) Service Road is a minor street which is parallel and adjacent to an arterial highway and which provides access to abutting properties and protection from through traffic. (e) Minor Street is a street of limited continuity used— primly for access to the abutting properties and the local needs of a neighborhood. (f) Street Width is the shortest distance between the Tines delineating the right-of-way of a street. J n 42,04 (g) Thoroughfare is a street where heavy volumes of fast moving vehicles are provided for. The streets have considerable continuity and are used primarily as a traffic artery foe Intercommunication among large areas. (h) Alley is a minor way which is used primarily for vehicular service access to the back or the side of properties abutting on a street. (21) SUBDIVIDER is any person commencing proceedings under these regulations to effect a subdivision, platting or registered survey of land hereunder for himself or for another. (22) SUBDIVISION is the division of a parcel(s) of land into two or more lots or parcels. The term includes re -subdivision, and, when appropriate to the context, shall relate to the process of subdividing or to the land subdivided. Any change in property lines which necessitates City approval before new deeds can be filed at the Register of Deeds Office constitutes a subdivision. 42.04 GENERAL PROVISIONS. Subdivision 1. Enforcement. Unless approved as provided herein, no subdivision shall be entitled to record in the County Register of Deeds Office or have any validity. The Municipality shall not issue building permits for any structure on a lot in any unrecorded subdivision. Subdivision 2. Penalty. Any firm, person or corporation who violates, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of the Chapter, or who sells or offers for sale or lease any lot or block of land herewith regulated before all the requirements of these regulations have been complied with shall be guilty of a mis- demeanor; and each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. 42.05 PROCEDURES. Subdivision 1. Preliminary Subdivision Plan. Full platting shall be required for all major subd visio— n requests. Minor subdivision requests shall require at least a surveyor's -certificate for approval. However, Council, whenever it deems appropriate, may require full platting for minor subdivisions. 42.05 44} (A) Thu subdivider shall make application to the Clerk- Administralor for a subdivision and pay the fees established herein. A sketch plan may be submitted by the subdivider for review by the City Bngincer, planning Commission and others. The purpose of reviewing such sketch plan shall be to unofficially advise the sub- divider of the extent to which the proposed subdivision conforms to this Chapter. Such unofficial advice shall not constitute a waiver of rights or any statutory or ordinance requirement. The sketch plan in order to be most useful shall include the following information: a. (1) location and legal description; bT (2) name and address of owner, subdivider or any other party of interest; e-. (3) whether land is registered or abstract property; dr T4_) date, north point, and scale; er T-5) streets within and adjacent to parcel(s); €. T67 property dimensions existing and proposed, g- T-7) location of physical features and any structures. 42} (B) At the time of application, the owner or subdivider shall indicate the proposed use of the property to be subdivided and if such proposed use requires it, shall file a proper petition for rezoning such property in accordance with Chapter 40. No subdivision shall be approved unless and until the said property has been rezoned in accordance with the proposed use thereof. When filing a subdivi- sion application, the subdivider shall submit an abstract of title, registered property report or supporting affidavits or documents showing the parties of interest in the property to be subdivided. 43} (C) a- (1) Major Subdivision. Before any official action shall be taken by the Municipality, the subdivider shall submit fifteen (15) copies of a preliminary plat of the proposed subdivision to the Clerk -Administrator; eight (8) additional copies shall be submitted by the subdivider to the Ramsey County Plat-¢eomissien Surveyor's Office. The preliminary plat shall be in such form and contain such information as required in 42.07 herein. • b- (2) Minor Subdivision. The subdivider shall submit to the Cierk-A ministrator ten (10) copies of a surveyor's certificate prepared by a Minnesota registered land surveyor. The surveyor's certificate shall be in such form and contain such information as required in 42.07 herein. 44} (D) When filing an application for a major subdivision, the subdivider shall submit an abstractor's certificate showing all the properties within 350 feet of the property being subdivided and the names of all owners of such properties. 44 (E) preliminary plats of major subdivisions shall be pro- vided by to the Clerk -Administrator for the purposes of review and comment to the City Engineer, City Attorney, County Engineer if plat abuts a county road, and State Highway District Engineer if plat abuts state highway. The 42.05 above shall have 15 days in which to submit their comments regarding the proposed subdivision to the Municipality. P The Clark -Administrator, Planning Commission, or Council may request the above authorities to similarly review and conuncnt on the preliminary subdivision plan of any minor subdivision request whenever such review is deemed neces- sary to properly evaluate the request. 4 4 (P) Preliminary plats of major subdivisions, which conform to the Municipal Storm Water Drainage Plan, shall be sub- mitted to the Rice Creek Watershed District for their review and comment. Preliminary plats, which do not so conform, shall be revised by the subdivider according to the stipulations of the Planning Commission and City Engineer prior to submission to the Rice Creek Watershed District. {9} (C) After comments have been received from the authorities indicated in paragraph (5) above, a report shall be prepared by the Clerk -Administrator and submitted to the Planning Commission with copies of the preliminary plat or surveyor's certificate within thirty (30) days following acceptance for filing. The report will address how the proposed subdivi- sion will affect traffic, utilities, drainage, community facilities, public safety, neighboring land uses, natural features, open spaces, the Comprehensive Plan, and any other matters concering public health, safety and welfare. {8} (H) The Planning Commission shall have the subdivision request on its agenda at its next regular meeting following receipt of the Clerk -Administrator's report. The subdivider or his representative shall be present at this meeting. 49} (I) Within sixty (60) days of receipt of the subdivision request and the Clerk -Administrator's report, the Planning Commission shall recommend to the Council approval or dis- approval of the subdivision. The Planning Commission may withhold action to so recommend until the comments of the Rice Creek Watershed District and other agencies have been received. 410} (J) Preliminary plats of major subdivisions shall require a public hearing. The Council shall conduct such hearing within at least thirty (30) days of receipt of the Planning Commission recommendation. The Clerk -Administrator shall cause notice of said hearing to be published in the official newspaper at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing, and shall also cause a notice to be mailed to each of the owners of property within 350 feet of the property being platted, such notices to be mailed to the last known address of such owners at least ten (10) days before the hearing. 42.05 411} (R) The Council shall approve or disapprove the prelimi- nary plat of a major subdivision or the surveyor's certi- ficate of a minor subdivision within sixty (60) days or receipt of the Planning Commission recommendation. The Council shall consider this recommendation and any comments or objections brought forth during the public hearing or by the Municipal consultants or other public agencies. 412T (L) If the Council does not approve the preliminary plat or surveyor's certificate, the reasons for such action shall be recorded in the proceedings and transmitted to the applicant subdivider. 414 (M) If the subdivider wishes to amend the preliminary plat of a major subdivision as approved or disapproved by the Council, he may submit an amended plat which shall follow the same procedures except the public hearing unless the amendment is, in the opinion of the Council, of such scope as to constitute a substantial change in the plat. 414} (N) If the preliminary plat of a major subdivision is approved by the Council, the subdivider may begin prepara- tion of the final plat. Preliminary approval does not constitute a waiver by the Council of any statutory, ordi- nance or other rights. 416} (0) If the surveyor's certificate of a minor subdivision is approved by the Council, the subdivider shall within sixty (60) days record a deed conforming to the terms of Council's approval of the subdivision with the County Register of Deeds or Registrar of Titles and within 10 days of record- ing furnish the City with a reproducible copy of the deed showing evidence of the recording; otherwise, the approval of the subdivision shall be void and the Clerk -Administrator shall so notify the County Register of Deeds or Registrar of Titles. No building permit shall be issued for construc- tion on a parcel created by such minor subdivision until evidence of recording has been submitted. Subdivision 2. Qualifications Governing Approval of Preliminary Plat. 41} (A) The Planning Commission and Council may require such revisions as they deem necessary for the health, safety, general welfare and convenience of the Municipality. 42} (B) The approval of a preliminary plat of a major subdivi- sion by the Council is tentative only, involving merely the general acceptability of the layout as submitted. The Council shall not permit the installation of any public improvements in the proposed plat unless the preliminary plat is approved. 42.05 44} (C) Sub:;cqucuL approval will hr required of the engineering proposals ccrtaining to water supply, storm drainage, sewer- age disposal and other utilities. 44} (D) Subsequent approval of the preliminary plat will be required by other public officials having jurisdiction, prior to the approval of the final plat by the Municipality. 46} (E) No plan will be approved for a major or minor subdivi- sion which covers an area subject to periodic flooding or which contains extremely poor drinage facilities and which would make adequate drainage of the streets and lots impossible, unless the subdivider agrees to make improve- ments which will, in the opinion of the Council, make the area completely safe for occupancy, and provide adequate street and lot drainage. 46} (F) Where an owner or subdivider proposes to subdivide only a portion of his property, the Council may require the owner or subdivider to submit a preliminary plan indicating his proposal for subdividing the balance of his property so as to have proper relationship of streets and lot orienta- tions with the portion to be subdivided and adjacent prop- erties. Subdivision 3. Final Plat. 41} (A) The owner or subdivider of a major subdivision shall file twelve (12) printed copies, in addition to the necessary copies required by the Ramsey County Plat-seAsiss#ea Survey- or's Office, of the final plat no later than six (6) months after the date of approval of the preliminary plat; other- wise, the preliminary plat and final plat will be considered void unless an extension is requested in writing by the subdivider and for good cause granted by the Council. The final plat shall be in such form and contain such information as required in 42.08 herein. 4�t lUl Tilc fivai Pia, hall Ce.^.fnrm *n hha I --i min>r.. 11t . p as approved. The Council may allow the subdivider to submit a final plat which includes only a portion of the approved preliminary plat. 43} (C) The Clerk -Administrator shall examine the final plat to determine whether it conforms to the preliminary plat as approved. If it conforms, the Clerk -Administrator shall so report to the Council within fifteen 15 days of its accep- tance for filing. 44} (D) If the Clerk -Administrator determines that the final plat as submitted does not conform with the terms of Council approval of the preliminary plat, he shall so report to the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission shall recommend to the Council approval or disapproval of the final plat within thirty (30) days of receipt of the Clerk -Administrator's report. 4 2%,,�f- {5} (E) Upon receipt of the Clerk -Administrator's report or the planning Commission recommendation, the Council may approve or di::;approvc the final plat and, if: approved, authorize that it be signed by the Clerk -Administrator. 46} (F) Final plat. if the final plat is approved, the subdi- vider shall within 120 days record it with the County Huii.;Lcr al Ucuds or Registrar of 'Titles and within ten (10) days of recording furnish the City with a reproducible copy of the final plat showing evidence of the recording; otherwise, the approval of the final plat shall be void and the Clerk -Administrator shall so notify the County Register of Deeds or Registrar of Titles. In the event the plat is not recordable as approved, or the subdivider fails to record within the time prescribed herein, the Council may reapprove the final plat upon the following terms and conditions: (1) that the subdivider proves to the satisfac- tion of the Council that the delay was caused by conditions beyond the control of the subdivider, and (2) that the extension of time requested has or will have no adverse affect on the City or property owners of the City, and (3) that the Council shall set the time limit of the extension requested, but in no event shall it exceed 120 days. Subdivision 4. Land Division. In any case where the division of a parcel of land into one or more lots or parcels for the purpose of transfer of ownership or building development does not come with the definition of subdivision as defined by this ordinance, a certia fied survey and description of such land division shall be filed with the Clerk -Administrator who shall submit copies of such division to the Planning Commission and Engineer; no building permit shall be issued until said description has been approved by the Council. 42.06 FEES. Subdivision 1. Base Fee. To defray administrative and other of processing subdivision requests, the following non-refundable Coz_s the base fees shall be paid at the time an application is filed wiLlt Clerk -Administrator: minor subdivision - $ 75.00 major subdivision - $150.00 Subdivision 2. Additional Deposit. {}} (A) An additional deposit shall be paid to cover all costs of public notices, materials, and staff or consultant time spent in review, research, or preparation of materials for said application in excess of the base fee. The applicant shall be given an estimate of these costs in excess of the base fee and shall deposit such amount with the City. An additional deposit shall be paid whenever the Clerk -Admini- strator determines that additional costs will be incurred beyond those initially estimated. No action on the applica tion shall be taken by the City until such fees and deposits have been paid as required. 42.07 42} (B) Any portion of the deposit not spent or encumbered shall be refunded to the applicant within thirty (30) days after consideration of the application is completed. When- ever an application is withdrawn prior to referral to the Planning Commission a refund shall be made of any portion of the deposit that has not been spent or encumbered. 44T (C) No official or agent of the City may sign or approve any plat or deed accepting or approving said plat or deed until any additional costs over and above the deposits have been paid. Subdivision 3. Park and Playground Dedication. The subdivider shall make a land or cash payment dedication to the Municipality according to the provision of 42.13 herein. 42.07 NECESSARY DATA FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT. The preliminary plat or surveyor's certificate of the proposed subdivision shall con- tain or have attached thereto the following information: Subdivision 1. Identification and Description. 41�(A) Proposed name of subdivision. 4.2}(B) Legal description of property. 49H C) Names and addresses of the owner, subdivider, surveyor, engineer, and designer of the plat. 44}(D) Graphic scale not less than one (1) inch to fifty (50) feet. Plat of ten (10) acres or larger may be drawn at a scale not less than one (1) inch to one hundred (100) feet. 4 WE) North point. 46HF) Date of preparation and of any revisions. Subdivision 2. Existing Conditions and Features. 4-WA) Boundary line survey, including measured distances and angles which shall be tied to the nearest 1/4 corner or section corner. 42}(B) Existing zoning classifications for land in and abutting the subdivision. 44}(C) Total acreage of plat and square feet of lots. 44}(D) Location, right-of-way width, and names of existing or platted streets, other public ways and public easements, structures within the preliminary plat and adjacent thereto shall also be included. 42.07 4W E) Location and size of existing sewers, water mains, culverts or other underground facilities within the preliminary plat area and to a distance of one hundred 0 (100) feet beyond. 4 W F) Boundary lines of adjoining land, within one hundred T100) feet, including all contiguous land owned or controlled by the subdivider. 44 (G) If requested, topographic data, including contours at vertical intervals of not more than two (2) feet, except where the horizontal contour interval is 100 feet or more, a one (1) foot- vertical interval shall be shown. Water- courses, marshes, wooded area, and other significant features shall also be shown. U.S.G.S. datum shall be used for all topographic mapping. 48}(11) Soil tests, as specified by the City Engineer, if requested. Subdivision 3. Proposed Conditions and Features. 41}(A) If requested, layout of proposed street system on a county section map. 42}(B) Layout of proposed streets, showing right-of-way widths and proposed names of streets. The name of any street heretofore used in the City or its environs shall not be used, unless proposed street is an extension of an already named street, in which event the name shall be used. 44}(C) Locations and widths of proposed alleys, pedestrian ways and utility easements. 44}(D) Layout, numbers and preliminary dimensions of lots and hlnrks. 45}(E) Minimum building setback lines. (Attention is directed to the requirements of Chapter 40.) 46}(F) Location of any proposed sanitary and storm sewer lines and water mains. 4-74(G) Proposed method of disposing of surface water drainage including proposed drainage easements. 48}(11) Center line gradients or proposed streets. 4W I) Areas, other than streets, alleys, pedestrian ways and utility easements, intended to be dedicated or reserved for public use, including the size of such area or areas in acres. 42.08 1 Subdivision 4. Other Information. {1}(A) Such other information as may be requested by the Planning Commission or Council. 42}(D) where the subdivider owns property adjacent to that which is being proposed for the subdivision, the Planning •• Commission may require that the subdivider submit a pre- liminary plan of the remainder of the property to show the possible relationships between the proposed subdivision and future subdivisions. In any event, all subdivisions must be shown to relate well with existing or potential adjacent subdivisions. 42.08 DATA NECESSARY FOR FINAL PLAT. Subdivision 1. General. The final plat shall be prepared by a land surveyor who is registered in the State of Minnesota and shall conform to all state and county requirements and the require- ments of this Chapter. Subdivision 2. Information to be Shown. 4WA) All dimensions including lot lines shall be shown in feet and hundredths of feet. 42}(p) Accurate radii, internal angles, points and curvatures, tangent bearings, and lengths of all arcs and accurate lineal dimensions for all lines, angles, and curvatures used to describe boundaries, streets, alleys, easements, areas to be reserved for public use. 44}(C) When lot lines are not at right angle to the street right-of-way line, the width of the lot at the building setback line shall be indicated. 44}(D) A numbered indentification system for all lots and Flocks. 4y4(E) A boundary line survey including the measured distance and angles and the true distance and bearing between a known point on the boundary and the nearest official monu- ment which shall be accurately described on the plat. 46}(F) municipal, county and/or section lines accurately tied to the lines of the subdivision by distances and angles. 44}(G) Name and location of all monuments. 49}(H) Accurate location of all monuments. 49}(I) Graphic scale and north point. 410(J) Names and right-of-way width of all streets and other right-of-way. 42.08 444 (K). Location of water bodies and dedication of flowage rights. ' 442(L) Accurate outlines and legal description of any areas to be dedicated or reserved for public use, or for the exclusive use of property owners within the subdivision, with the purpose indicated therein. 443}(M) Certification by a registered surveyor in the form required by Minnesota Statutes. 41* (N) Execution of the certificate by all owners of any interest in the land and any holders of a mortgage thereon shall include a dedication of the utility easements and any other public areas in such form as shall be approved by the City Attorney. 41W O) Forms for approval by Council, Ramsey County, and other authorities as required. 41W P) Any other information as may be required by the Planning Commission or Council. 42.09 MINIMUM SUBDIVISION DESIGN STANDARDS. 6dbd}vis£en-}---Eet�€e�mikp-N#ih-the-Ee>nry�eHeAs#ve-P}an---�qe @�e@esed-su)3d#v}s#eA-sha}}_eery€e�x�-t;e-�l�e-Bem@�ehens#ve-P}anr- Subdivision 1. Conformity with P1unici.pal Plans and Ordinances. The proposed ubdlvislon shall conform with the Official Man - ter 40 of this Code, Cha Plan. Subdivision 2. Street Plan. The arrangements, character, extent, width, grade, and location of all streets shall be considered in their relation to reasonable circulation of traffic, to topo- graphiral conditions, to runoff of storm water, to public convenience and safety, and to the proposed uses of the land to be served by such streets. 4}}(A) Streets. a.(1) Continuation of Existing Streets. The arrangement of streets in new subdivision shall make provision for the appropriate continuation of the existing streets in adjoining areas. b.(2) Future Projection of Streets. Where adjoining areas are not subdivided, but may be subdivided, the arrangement of streets in a new subdivision shall make provision for the proper projections of streets into adjoining areas by carrying the new streets to the boundaries of the new subdivision at appropriate locations. 42.09 et(3) Widths. All street right-of-way widths shall con- form to Lhc following minimum dimensions: Minor Arterial So feet Collector Streets 66 feet Local Streets 60 feet Service Roads 50 feet Cul-dc-sacs 65 feet radius 42}(B) Alleys. a..(1) Restricted to Certain Zones. Alleys shall not be platted in residential areas but may be platted in industrial and business zones where appropriate to the overall design. g-(2) Widths. All alley rights -of -way shall be at least 24 feet in width. Subdivision 3. Pedestrian Wad. In blocks over 900 feet long, pedestrian crosswalks t ri—} ough the blocks and at least ten (10) feet wide of concrete or other surfacing may be required in locations deemed necessary to public health, convenience and necessity. Subdivision 4. Easements. 41}(A) Provided for Utilities. Easements at least ten (10) feet wide, centered on rear and other lot lines, shall be pro- vided for utilities where necessary and shall be dedicated to the public by appropriate language in the owner's certi- ficiate. They shall have continuity of alignment from block to block, and at deflection points easement for pole -line anchors shall be provided where necessary. 42}(B) Provided for Drainage. Easements shall be provided along each side of the center line of any watercourse or drainageway ehannel whether or not shown in the Comprehensive Plan, to a width sufficient to provide proper maintenance of storm sewers, and they shall be dedicated to the Munici- pality by appropriate language in the owner's certificate. Additional easements may be required for streets, parkways or park strips parallel to the watercourse, drainage or storm sewer line. c) Provided for Designated Wetlands. Easements shall be orovi 7 for wetlands, as delineated by the "Official Mao" N cate. Subdivision 5. Blocks. 4 WA) Factors Governing Dimensions. Blcok length and width or acreage within bounding streets shall be such as to accommodate the size of residential lots required in the 42.09 area by the zoning chapter and to provide for convenient access, circulation control, and safety of street traffic 42}(D) Arrangement. A block shall be so designed as to provide two tiers of lots, unless it adjoins a lake, stream, park, state or federal highway, where it may have a single tier of lots. Subdivision 6. Lots. 41}(A) Location. All lots shall abut on a publicly dedicated street that has received legal status as such. 42}(D) Size. The lot dimensions in subdivisions shall not be less than the minimum dimensions required to secure the minimum lot area specified in the zoning chapter for the district within which the land is located. 49}(C) Side Lot Lines. Side lines of lots shall be substan- tially at right angles to the street line. 44}(D) Lot Remnants. All remnants of lots below minimum size left over after subdividing of a larger tract must be added to adjacent lots, rather than allowed to remain as unusable parcels. Subdivision 7. Watercourses. Lots abutting upon a watercourse drainageways, channel or stream shall have an additional depth or ` width, as required, to assure house sites that are not subject to flooding. Subdivision S. Natural Features. In the subdividing of any land, due regard shall be shown for all natural features, such as tree growth, watercourses, historic spots or similar conditions, which if preserved will add attractiveness and stability to the proposed developments. Subdivision 9. Monuments. Monuments of permanent character shall be placed in locations on the boundary of any major subdivision and within it as required to permanently define all property lines and street right-of-way. 42.10 UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. Subdivision 1. Underground Utilities Required. 4 WA) All new electric distribution lines (excluding main line feeders and high voltage transmission lines), telephone service lines and services constructed within the confines of and providing service to customers in a newly platted residential area shall be buried underground. 0 4.2}(D) The subdivider is responsible for complying with the requirements of this section, and shall submit to the Planning Commission a written instrument from the utilities 42.10 showing that the necessary arrangements with the utility involved for the installation of said facilities will be OWN made. Subdivision 2. Excc_ptions• The foregoing requirements in Subdivision 1 may be waived by the Council, if after study and reconmendation by the Planning Commission that (1) and/or (2) below are applicable to the proposed subdivision: 44 (A) The placing of cletric and telephone utilities under- ground would not be compatible with the development planned. 42}(B) Unusual topography, soil, or other physical conditions make underground installation unfeasible from an engineering viewpoint or the cost impractical. 42.11 SOIL TESTS. Upon the advice of the City Engineer the Council may require soil tests prior to -the approval of the final plat. Such test holes, when ordered by the City authorities, shall be drilled at the expense of the owner or developer and the infor- mation disclosed shall be furnished to the Council together with a copy of the proposed plat showing the location of each test hole, the information as to the various types of soil encountered and their depths, the level of the ground water and a seepage test and may include additional information. The number of test holes to be drilled and their .location on the property which is proposed to be platted will be as directed by the Council or their authorized rep- resentative. 42.12 PUBLIC SITES, PARKS AND PLAYGROUNDS. Where a proposed park, playground, school site or other public site as shown on the Comprehensive Plan or. Open Sapcc Master Plan is embraced in part or in whole by the boundary of a proposed subdivision and such public sites are not dedicated to the Municipality or Board of Education, such public ground shall be reserved and no action taken toward approval of a subdivision for a period not to exceed ninety (90) days to allow the Council to take action toward acquisition of such public ground or park by purchase or other means. 42.13 PARKS AND PLAYGROUNDS DEDICATION. Subdivision 1. Dedication Required. 41} (A) Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 462.358, in all subdivi- sions to be developed for residential, commercial, industrial or other uses, or as a planned development which includes residential, commercial and industrial uses, or any combina- tion thereof, a reasonable portion of each proposed subdi- vision shall be dedicated to the _public for public use as parks, playgrounds, public open space, or storm water holding areas or ponds, or, at the option of the Municipality, at its sole discretion, that the subdivider contribute an equivalent amount in cash based on the fair market value of the unde- veloped land. 42.13 {�}(D) Cash payments so received shall be placed in a special fund and used only for the acquisition of land for parks, playgrounds, public open space, and storm water holding areas or ponds, development of existing park and playground sites, public open space and storm water holding areas or pond:;, ;ind debt retirement in connection with land pre- viously acquired for such public purposes. Expenses incurred by the City in acquiring said cash dedication may be deducted from said dedication before it is deposited in the park and playground fund. {3}(C) The Municipality, at its sole discretion, may take into consideration the open space, park, recreational or common areas and facilities which the subdivider has provided for the exclusive use of the residents of the subdivision, except that storm water holding areas or ponds, whether re- quired by the Municipality or any other regulatory body, may not be taken into consideration. Subdivision 2. Procedures. Upon receipt of a qualifying subdivision the Council shall refer it to the Park and Recreation Commission. Said commission shall report to the Council its recom- mendation as to whether there should be a land or a cash payment dedication. Upon receipt of the recommendation, the Council shall call for either a land dedication or a cash payment, in size, loca- tion or amount as it determines. The Council may require a profes- sional appraisal to determine market value for purposes of a cash payment. 0 Subdivision 3. Credit for Existing Single Family Dwelling. The subdivider of any parcel of land shall receive a ere it for the existing single family dwelling unit by excluding the acreage of the occupied parcel remaining after subdivision from the computation of dwelling units per acre, if the parcel of land is zoned for single family dwelling. Subdivision 4. Dedication for Residential Lands. The subdivider of anv tract of land which is to be developed for residential uses shall dedicate to the public for public use as parks, playgrounds, public open space, or storm water holding areas or ponds, that dollar value of the tract to be subdivided, which corresponds with the applicable density of the subdivision in the following schedule: Density 0 - 2 Dwelling units/acre 2.1 - 3 Dwelling units/acre 3.1 - 4 Dwelling units/acre 4.1 - 5 Dwelling units/acre 5.1 or More Dwelling unit/acre Maximum Dedication Per Acre as a % of Fair Market Value of Unde- veloped Land e* 42.14 Subdivision 5. Dedication for Commercial and Industrial Lands. The subdivider of any tract of land which is to be developed for commercial and industrial uses shall dedicate to the public for public use as parks, playgrounds, public open space, or storm water holding areas or ponds, 10 percent of the land of the proposed sub- division, or at the option of the Municipality, an equivalent amount of cash. 42.14 REGISTERED LAND SURVEYS AND CONVEYANCE BY METES AND BOUNDS All Registered Land Surveys shall be filed su ject to the same pro- cedure as required for the filing of a preliminary plat for platting purposes. The standards and requirements set forth in this ordinance shall apply to all Registered Land Surveys. Unless the Council shall approve the Registered Land Survey in accordance with this Ordinance, building permits of the tracts shall be withheld, tracts set aside for street purpose shall not be accepted and no public money shall be spent towards installing utilities or improvements. No Registered Land Survey shall receive final approval without deeding of streets to the City in a recordable form. No conveyance by metes and bounds shall be permitted except where mandated by specific provisions of Minnesota Statutes Annotated or where allowed under minor subdivision procedures herein. 42.15 MODIFICATIONS, VARIANCES AND EXCEPTIONS. Subdivision 1. Planned Developments. Exceptions, variances or modifications of the strict application of this Chapter may be granted in case of planned unit developments, provided the Council, upon review and recommendations from the Planning Commission, shall find that the proposed development is fully consistent with the purpose and intent of this Chapter. A "planned unit development" shall be considered any development which conforms to the definition and requirements thereof in the Zoning Chapter. This provision of the Chapter is intended to provided flexibility needed for new land planning and land development trends and techniques. Subdivision 2. Variance. The Council may grant a variance of these subdivision regulations in any particular case where the sub- divider can show that by reason of exceptional topography or other physical conditions the strict compliance with these regulations could cause an exceptional and undue hardship on the enjoyment of a substantial property right, provided such relief may be ytanted with- out detriment to the public welfare and without impairing the intent and purpose of this Chapter. Subdivision 3. Procedure. 44}(A) Application for any exception, variance or modification of the requirements of these subdivision regulations shall be made in writing by the subdivider at the time when the preliminary plat is filed for consideration by the Munici- pality, stating fully all facts relied upon by the petitioner and shall be supplemented with maps, plans, or other addi- tional data which may aid the Planning Commission and Council in the analysis of the proposed project. FI.LI 42.16 43}(B) The plans for such development shall include such covenants, restrictions or other legal provisions necessar• to guarantee the full achievement of the plan. A {3}(C) Any exception, variance or modification thus granted shall be recorded in the minutes of the Council setting forth the reasons which justified the action. 42.16 COPIES OF PLATS. Copies of all such plats of subdivisions, after the same have been submitted and approved as provided in these regulations, shall be filed and kept by the Clerk -Administrator among the records of Mounds View. 42.17 VALIDITY. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase o tthh ss Chapter is for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Chapter. 41 MEMO TO: City Council Clerk -Administrator Director of Public Works/Community Development FROM: Engineering/Planning Technician Fjt_ DATE: October 21, 1982 SUBJECT: PIETROWSKI SUBDIVISION AND REZONING Attached to this memo are the following items regarding the above subdivision/rezoning request: 1) Staff report to Planning Commission 2) Planning Commission minutes approving Resolution No. 63-82 3) Resolution No. 63-82 The public hearing for this item is being set at your upcoming meeting on October 25th. Discussion will take place on November 1st. It was suggested that the above three items be forwarded to you at this time for your review. Should you decide to approve either the subdivision or subdivision and rezoning together, staff would be directed to draft a resolution for subdivision approval and an ordinance for rezoning approval at your November 1st meeting for adoption November 8th. Should you have any questions regarding the above, please contact me. FJK/bc Attachments CASE: 115-02, ILem 6 on 10/6/112 Planniiny Commission Agenda ITEM: Rezoning (11-1 Co k-2), Minor Subdivision (1 lot into 2) APPLICANT: Jim Piotrowski LOCATION: 0495 Red Oak Drive (SuutheasL corner of County Road J and Red Oak Drive) SUMMARY OF REQUEST Applicant requests to subdivide his lot which measures 234 feet by 160.74 feet into two lots, the corner lot (Parcel A) 114 feet wide and the interior lot (Parcel B) 120 feet wide. The applicant also requests to rezone the interior lot from 11-1 Single Family to R-2, single and two-family residential. PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS Subdivision: 1) The proposed subdivision meets and exceeds both minimum front- age and minimum area requirements. 2) The: existing structure on the corner lot will meet minimum setback requirements. 3) The existing shed on Parcel B will be removed and relocated on Parcel A. Rezoning: 1) Attached for your review and information are the following: a) Site Location b) Section Map c) Existing Zoning Map d) Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map e) Comprehensive Plan District 5 Map and Narrative f) Zoning Amendment Checklist and Rezoning Narrative from "Local and Regional Planning in Minnesota" (pages 68-69) g) Chapter 40.23 - Amendment Procedure h) Surveyor's Certificate 2) County Road I is considered a minor arterial. i Services: 1) Water is available on County Road J. 2) The sanitary sewer service would have to be extended from an existing stub off of a sanitary sewer manhole on County Road J (See Surveyor's Certificate). c Lot ru. I�. Ie1i I Ixl m.N I.In P,." iiI r Ixrm Oxr rml =M W r �i 51TE oL.11.. 1 ;I \ Su6DIVI510N � G ' \ REZONItJ(j u ' `v' R6QUES'j" ,� I, it • ..•'. � z�ti i:� J I Ill,yl f' A iI GI S�IhI� ru.nro II WN� 1 II it 1V1111_.N I •'I+ M��\ 14 UMh�!-:.i-���!i � 3;I(I I.W.�NI ^ 1 �I � I p'I NI • II I "•• I '�I �I +wa Iw fl � � � Id'.ul 9 I .Vlwl YI pI •'il •I .I c+ I II nauln 'Oppryl I I I yy� � • uuw. 1 .1: � III I I 1 I t h� �I . � I..1 ^y� •�..1._ .�il.`� ...'t .. j ..IyI l n V .,i. I V 8 Indl V•., NIN OINENIIW • ••• a rYi h � uY.a G„ 11 fa u rx` rYl �Vil I 1! ;I . . _.. IIAM WI I 1 y \ ^ A n 1•�la W II I� I!y1 � iry 2 _ 1..1 w lxl L. + Ir IMr nrq IN,"k IN M r WwIrYI MI ,* rol I 1' • r wuwnrronlbwµld . II I � I•I � qI y � I Ir; it r.I . IY. M, rxlr• R�� :ri ;I � ailrxl i rI„I„II 'I III 7 7- „R•2Y5►TE oFl PRoPos�b\ B•3 5U8PIV II's AND I� ,I ,• I 1 1,1 rd�, ywM II +I ��'�©�►I�n/ I r.'r 1iV r Irn � 1iN r. �� wl B.3' 1 C .,Yx I I 7 .� r.' ': 1'' ki •ya, B.3 jI f'I '3? 3 I [�•� Irrw nA t '' •", gg R33 03 i } I !! j- R 3 R 3 rl i rR 2l I�:1�• B 3 B. ►,I 3 �i �! r II •I . J. Ir I II 1 I '. !i A' (h � i B•2: III .rn, r...i�L: iR 2 p B 2 I '3 � �j ••I' ��i �� R,3 n r' � R'�1 1•� � Ii � _ r ' i'pll u.r I s�9" I .YMIo nra v.Yaxn, 7I�� R • 1 ...1 444 1 \II 1 Iw.0 I rwl R• a '� • RIIa�,(' B 1 B 3� u� R 1 R"2. ii R 3 I j R 2 .;- Y..B. sal l,wrn. ,�Ygli F I `'.'I I 0•3. 'III I r.r i ! ! R 3 IY'�nrwx�b m I : inpw •,'i. r 3'Rljti;u A.2J Bra J iu,i I iI ' ± Io I IM. p.3 r: r f. x:. Ywcrrlm „' rill B•1_ I Existing Zoning R•1 Singla Fomily B'2 Retail Butinett R•2 Two Family B•3 Ganoral Bminett 1 , R•3 Ganetal Retidenca I'1 Lighl IndWrial Ell 41mitod Blninatt B•3 1.1 �lm .4r R•3 711 Vx/UIJ�� (�iJ } 1A, to 14. I I/y1�•�'�utll yI 1 I \ ••:S;. C, ,: •ti �[•._ ••��': i, �• to.m.Vurur yhumY NII r t 1 ^ 11 'I \\ f \\ V 6 L•✓VV[.1 NJ, [ny [MYW III •' `I^I•'• 1� IJ1 444 �1 ''I \� • ,j / / i ( L Y[•1 .r Lr. 4L[r[[ I/ II d � i'\�' ,: vn•,.v�i`.��: {. •li.::.;, •ya nn[[nLnol l,l[cuu[a [ " .11 iP7 11 JI l ...�0 •.•.y;.i:'.�5., a.: vo:�'!d'r..ii.'�: ,: Ski'•%%/• I !, j �` G 51 �E cF PRoPOS fi `"LN. wl•�?'i,; n Cil, !�n �+r•^'i 'I `�JI';Dt�I510ri A1.1D ��. N>:= �"!' No WNIJ [ L"r �� /%:T '' ... _. �"•,,,. ! .. it Ji If { NC I , ;. �• ;,� ,,; . , � ----- �- )I ��•- I III 11C C� IVH J�NC z I I 47 L'\ ,.:: nil lsw •�, 'I `i�.. - U :nE .,. r.+ . � J ay Commcraal/ 1 � IrvJus{rial �i 4pII ���}} nl .ercylll.�m lX9' � I• , lqJ -r ��\ Put') _ r NI 11=1 IN.it [ I 11 j I��1 J13 i1'J Nln, IIA'�1'Y ' I• � �,• •`� land use plan (generalized pattern) RESIDENTIAL 0 COMMERCIAI. <••- r. • „ • i Low density NC Naighholhoral s:••"' °y'.•. M Medium densi ly HC Highwny ;..•5as, ya Trailer pork %��' .:;•o>• do,S""I� U7':�%1 High density OkMINDUSTRIAL j PUBLIC QR SEMI—PUBLIC O NItlUP P Pork S School nr la �///1�/1 ICIIIIIIILIII�III (I1I C Church NDRTHWESTASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS INC.AA a.v Proposed land use L D Low density residential M D Medium density residential M D/T Medium density - Iruiler park H D High density residential NC Neighborhood commercial HC Highway commercial IND Industrial S School C Church R Pork/prd914 ° wHiry 141 istrict natural fPaturP.S* r� Flood plain/metro area designated wetlands �IIIf Steep slopes CNJ Tree massing *Approximate locations - subject to detailed review at time of proposed development ' I CIICCKIISTof OUCSI11P6 In Ill. nAINI 11 The ,following are some llrlesumv, which Should be raiud when proposals lul tuning ,mlcndmcols, variances and special use peonils are brought be. fore the planning Commission of the govcnling body. Zoning Amendment Has there been a change in the development policies of the conmlunity? Has there been a change in the conditions in the community such as rapid population of de• velopnuml change? Was there a mistake made in the development Ill the uriginal toning ordinance which nerds to be i corrected? Is the toning ordinance up lo.d.nc? Dues the proposed anlendnlrnl Crnllulm to the comprehensive development plan? Is the proposed use uvnpatihle wish adjacrnl Lind uses? Is the proposed amendment ,old laud use likely to lead to a monopoly silualiun so as In amount to Spot Zoning? Is the timing proper for the proposed rezoning? Are all the utilities available to serve the proposed development? Whal is the effect of the proposed retuning on such public utilities as sanitary sewers, water, roads, schools? Will the proposed development place an undue financial burden on the local community? __ LOCAL AND RECTCNAL I'LANNTNG IN MTNNESOTA PACES 68 and 69 Zoning Amendment (Rezoning) Ile 1161in purpose ul the nuuug anu ndun ul is Io allow the runununily In i11.lnre the Irmingrlldi Manse or map. There ,lie [wil b.lsic types of a• numulolcnts, one is ,1 Ruing na.gt anlendmcnl or ,I ch.mge in the gcugraphic'al awa ltf a zoning di%llicl which i% Jku jlnpulally known as Iczaning. The uthcr is a [hinge in the tuning text, ul ch,uiGes in What is Irclnutled in ,1 pallicld.lr tuning disllit•t. I helc ale ,I number Ill rt'asuns wlay a cumuli• oily may went to amend the tuning urdinuus. —One is fo retlecl a significant and unanticipated change in the community brought about 1hruugh rapid changes in teehnningy, or nilmn development or social behavior. In today's rapidly changing Mudd, it is villually inqulssihlc to predict flouts develupmenl beyond a 5•I0•year period with any degree of accuracy. Thus, it is recognized by most planning prulcssiunals that Zile Cl milrehemiye plan should be updated it least evety 3.5 years In te• fleet these changes. Sines zoning should he baked fin [he cuntplchcnsive plan, the utdin.ulce should be unendcd when the cungneiemivc plan is Lilt - dated. A fecund reason is to rellecl changes in polity by the t'untmunity. This may come about in a variety of different ways. Fur example, cerlain planning pulitics and programs may not be bring• ing ahmn the desired goals which may necessitate .I change in develupolent policies. 01 development in adjacrnl communities may affect [he annnuo- oily in such a way as It, require ch.mges in develop• numl policy. Fur example, a stale or county high• way department play dcicfiuinc lu Iltcalc a major highway through or adjacenl to a community which obviously will have a substantial effect fin develupnneol. A third reason is to correct mistakes which were made al the lime the cumplchensive plan of nming ordinance was developed and adopted, In must planning programs, minor errors will often be made which are overlooked at the little of adopting the ennnprdunsive plan or zoning ordinance. To Coned these errors, the zoning amendment pro• swill ! would be applicable. Finally, « zonings (or changes in district lines) ,lie Often desired and apprupriate in "Slagcd growth" plans which male use of "holding zones," For example, a typical holding zone in a staged Inns Ill pl.ltl play he a lelalively large area designa• Ird flit .q;u, moll!. II is it -cognized that as growth Illull'% (1111 tit lilt, Inral ,IICas that Snnle IrCSC grin uhued .lees will be lo-tuned for resi, or uultnlrrti 11 liars .0 soch lisle I11,11 utilities call be emended lit %viv'ices provided Ili bring about order• ly lInclopmcnt. It should be noted that the staged gnns[h ,glynnath 11.1% nul yet Item tested in [lie t01111% in Minnesota although this approach to pl.uuting h,n been upheld in the highest court in New Yw1. Slue. II.Iv1ng diSCW%ed generally the rationale and Ihrury till zoning amendments, two 1W *..,m areas dolling with nming amendments need ill :: •Discus• sed at lumber length. One is spot zoning lad the ulhcl is down tuning. Spol zoning. Spul zoniq has been defined as the kilning of a single parcel of land or a relative- ly small area for higher intensity use than the land stirnnuoling the particular parcel of land. Usually spin zoning invulvc% a single parcel of land singled oul fill special and privileged treatment primarily for lite benefit of the landuwner and not in a cord with the comprehensive plan. For exam . e rezoning ul a single parcel of land in a ref 1,II area Iur cununercial or industrial uses which are not cumpalihle with the surrounding land uses or in nmflrrmance with tilt! comprehensive plan IS usually held by the comes to be illegal in that it amounts Io %lilt[ zoning. In the absence of a eom- pn'hrn%ive IlLm, it is inure difficult to determine whether a particular retuning amounts to spot zoning. Split zoning usually results when the local of- ficials arc tun liberal in the granting of requested zoning amendments. 'there may be many reasons wily a property owner may want a rezoning or zoning amenclmcot, sonic of which are legitimate but %mne of which are not, in relation to the com• munily planning process. For example, a properly owner may want a rezoning to enhance the oppor• tunities of selling his land, or to gain a competitive, localional advantage with a business enterprise, even though [he proposed rezoning may be incom• patible with the surrounding honnes duo to etc sive onise, glare, and traffic. (:are should be used by the local officials in is. suing trvonings or zoning amendments. If too many tuning amcndntcnls are authorized, it may and often dues destroy or seriously weaken the planning process. It may also open the local tom, 40.23 entity that is to be responsible for the management and maintenance of any public or common open space or service facility. C. All certificates, seals and signatures required for the dedication of land and recordation of documents. d. Final architectural working drawings of all structures. e. Final engineering plans and specifications for streets, utilities and other public improvements, together with a Community/Developer Agreement for the instal- lation of such improvements and financial guarantees for the completion of such improvements. f. Any other plan, agreements, or specifications necessary for the City staff to review the proposed construction. 40.23 ADMINISTRATION - AMEND14ENTS AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS Subd. A Procedure. (1) Request for amendments or conditional use permits, as provided within this Code, shall be filed with the City /`. Clerk on an official application form. Such application shall be accompanied by a fee as outlined in Section 40.26. This fee shall not be refunded. Such application shall also be accompanied by ten (10) copies of detailed written and graphic materials fully explaining the proposed change, development, or use. The City Clerk shall refer said application, along with all related information, to the City Planning commission for consideration and a report and recommendation to the City Council. (2) The Planning Commission shall consider the request at its next regular meeting unless the filing date falls within fifteen (15) days of said meeting, in which case the request would be placed on the agenda and considered at the regular meeting following the next regular meeting.; The City Clerk shall refer said application along with all related information to the City Planning Commission at least ten (10) days prior to the regular meeting. (3) The applicant or a representative before the Planning Commission in questions concerning the proposed use. (4) thereof shall appear order to answer amendment or conditional j The amendment or conditional use application shall be ) referred to the City staff for a report and recommen- dation to be presented to the Commission. A preliminary draft of the city staff's report and recommendations shall be gi•en to the City Planning Commission at least 40.23 ten (10) days prior to the meeting at which said repor� ' and recommendations are to br presented. The final report and reconmondaLions of: the city staff is to be entered in and made part of the permanent written record of the Planning Commission meeting. (5) The Planning Commission shall consider possible adverse effects of the proposed amendment or conditional use. Its judgement shall be based upon (but- not limited to) the following factors: a. Relationship to municipal comprehensive plan. b. The geographical area involved. c. Whether such use will tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is proposed. d. The character of the surrounding area. e. The demonstrated need for such use. (6) The Planning Commission and city staff shall have the authority to request additional information from the applicant concerning operational factors or to retain expert testimony with the consent and at the expense of the applicant concerning operational factors, said information to be declared necessary to establish per- formance conditions in relation to all pertinent sections of this Code. I ,� r (7) The planning Commission shall make a finding of fact and recommend such actions or condti.ions relating to the reques`. as they deem necessary to carry out the intent and purpose of the Code. Such recommendation shall be in writing and accompanied by the report and recommendation of the city staff. (8) The City Council shall not grant a conditional use permit until they have received a report and recommendation from the Planning Commission and the city staff or until sixty (60) days after the first regular Planning Commission meeting at which the request was considered. (9) Upon receiving the report and recommendation of the Planning Commission and the city staff, the City Council shall place the report and recommendation on the agenda for the next regular meeting. Such reports and recommen- dations shall be entered in and made part of the permanent written record of the City Council meeting. (10) Upon receiving the report and recommendation of the 'I Planning Commission and the city staff, the City Council shall have the option to set and hold a public hearing if deemed necessary and shall make a recorded finding of fact and shall impose any conditions it considers necessary to protect the public health, safety and welfM. !' 40.23 (11) Approval of a request shall require passage by a four- fifths(4/5) vote nr the full City Council. (12) The City Clerk shall notify the applicant of the Council's decision in writing. Subd. B. Amendments - Initiation. The City Council or Planning Commission may, upon their own motion, initiate a request to amend the text or the district boundaries of this Code. Any person, owning real estate within the City may initiate a request to amend the district: boundaries or text of this Code so as to affect the said real estate. Subd. C Conditional Use Permit. (1) Purpose. The purpose of a conditional use permit is' to provide the City of Mounds View with a reasonable degree of discretion in determining the suitability of certain designated uses upon the general welfare, public health and safety. In making this determination, whether or not the conditional use is to be allowed, the City may consider the nature of the adjoining land or buildings, whether or not a similar use is already in existence and located on the same premises or on other lands immediately close by, the effect �— upon traffic into and from the premises, or on any adjoining roads, and all such other or further factors as the City shall deem a requisite of consideration in determining the effect of such use on the general welfare, public health, and safety. (2) Reconsideration. Whenever an application for a conditional; use permit has been considered and denied by the City Council, a similar application for a conditional use permit affecting substantially the same property shall j not be considered again by the Planning Commission or City Council for at least six (6) months from the date of its denial; and a subsequent application affecting substantially the same property shall likewise not be considered again by the Planning Commission or City Council for an additional six (6) months from the date of the second denial unless a decision to reconsider such matter is made by not less than four -fifths (4/5) vote of the City Council. (3) Lapse of Conditional Use Permit by Non -Use. Whenever within one (1) year after granting a conditional use permit the work as permitted by the permit shall not have been completed, then such permit shall become null and void unless a petition for extension of time in which to complete the work has been granted by the City Council. Such extension shall be requested in writing and filed with the City Clerk at least thirty (30) days before the expiration of the original W xu . �.trlt N�'14 s4-�, (CO 5> - -- - -- �FtgTte nrtq� 'I � ,N.FI.- `rca sCuuYt t'a4•o - .i _ Kx. N I A YY *.tk 10 $tilot -DATA 0 N u �I gg91 Ct t pu�CQ,P-t� m Y y�a � [- r „ �,� 00 N A1tnTctl�� A o00 -li� 19420�� 1! �I Dr 1JLZ(I \ 11 ; - J 30 310 I Ip O`N 1:-O2.owsKl 'lraG 7i I U xl I q,}gS � I 0Co. 4 I $U(1.Vle'�{Od` - kGu2-C�-1 'SU2VeS`!�*lCy tlJG, v 'a26P ost-'O SPA' -ao- E. PROCEEDINGS OF THE PLANNING COM1,1ISSION CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW RAMISEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA Regular Meeting October 6, 1982 Mounds View City Hall 2401 Ilwy. 10, Mounds View, MN 55112 ------"-------------------------------------------------------------- The Mounds View Planning Commission was called 1. Call to Order to order by Chairman Mountin at 7:37 PM. MEMBERS PRESENT: Commissioners Linke, Anderson, 2. Roll Call McZ`artiy, Warren, Miller, Breske and Chairman Mountin. ALSO PRESENT: Engineering/Planning Technician Rampel It was noted that Councilmember Forslund was absent. Motion/Second: Linke/Warren to approve the 3. Approval of 8eptem er 982 minutes as presented. Minutes: September 1, 5 ayes 0 nays 2 abstentions 1982 Motion Carried Commissioners McCarthy and Breske abstained from the vote as they had not been present at the September 1 meeting. There were no residents comments or requests 4. Residents Com- from the floor, ments and Re- quests from the Floor Chairman Mountin reported the Planning Commission 5. Jim Pietrowski had discussed Mr. Pietrowski's request at their 8495 Red Oak Dr agenda session, and requested Staff to prepare Minor Subdivisi Resolution No. 63-82, recommending approval of (1 lot into 2) the subdivision. Rezoning (R-1 t R-2) Single Motion/Second: Miller/Linke to approve Reso- Family Resident Iution No. -82. District Case 115-82 7 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Chairman Mountin informed Mr. Pietrowski he would be notified by the City of when the public hearing will be scheduled. MOUNOII V.IE'W PLANNING COMMISSION I(LSOI-IJ'I'.ION NO. 63-82 (1.1'1'Y OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSI:Y :A'A'1111. 01" MINNI{5()'I'A RES0MITION RI.ICOMMEMING APPROVAL OF A MINOR jUDDIV1SLON AND REZONING FOR 8495 RED OAK DRIVE WIILfl(LA:;, Lhc MuumlS View Planning Commission has received an al:pl irnl ion from ,lim 1'ieLrow;;hi requcst.iny approval for a minor a Subdivinion and rezoning of one of the subdivided lots from R-1 to R-2; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has received and reviewed reports from City staff regarding the request and its application to the Mounds View Municipal Code; and WIILRE'AS, Lhu OxisL-ing and proposed lots all meet or exceed m.ininu;m toning Codu rcqui.rements; and 1, the passed Resolutilonl(SNo.10-81 outlining 8criter.ialfor 1R-2ng Crezoningnrequests; and WIILREAS, this resolution staled that R-2 developments should continue Co be ca.lss.if.ied as low dcnsi.ty housing and this type of hou:;inq nhuuld be restricted to the periphery of low density zones in ;crcas (}'here they would provide transition to higher density residen- Cial ur uther n;orc inLcn;;i.vc land uses; and WHEREAS, this proposed rezoning request does meet the above criteria by being located on the periphery of a low density zone; and WHEREAS, County Road J .is considered a minor arterial with airport property located north of County Road J; and i WHEREAS, an R-2 development would Le appropriate for this location; NOW, TIIEREPORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission recommends approval of the request by Jim Pietrowsl-i to :;ubdiv.ide the lot 1.11 question into NO lots and rezone the easterly of these two lots from R-1, single family to R-2, two family residential; ATTEST: (:il;AL) Adopted this Gth day of October, 1982. Chairman FUMIc Works/Community Development Director MEMO TO: City Council FROM: Director of Public Works/Community Development DATE: October 21, 1982 SUBJEC'P: 7911 SPRING LAKE ROAD - RELOCATION OF BUILDING REQUEST The City has received a request and application from Mr. and Mrs. Louis Wille of 7911.Spring Lake Road to relocate a single family home from the southern part of the Twin Cities onto their lot in Mounds View. They request and hope to have the building relocated onto their lot yet this year. Due to potential weather conditions, they would request the matter be processed as soon as possible. Staff would propose, with Council approval, that the hearing for the relocation be held on November Sth. The Planning Commission would review the matter on November 3rd and their report, together with staff's review,would be included in your packet for information on November 4th. Attached for your information is a copy of Chapter 45 entitled, "Relocation of Buildings". Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. /be Attachments 45.01 1 CHAPTER 45 THE RELOCATION OF BUILDINGS • 45.01. APPLICATION AND NEARING. Any person seeking to locate a building In the Municipality, which was previously used or occupied outside of Mounds View, shall apply to the Clerk -Administrator for a hearing date. 45.02. CONTENTS OF APPLICATION. The applicant shall supply the following: (1) Legal description of the land upon which the building is to be placed. (2) The nature of the building to be moved, together with a picture of the building. (3) A certified abstract of all owners of property located within 300 feet of the proposed relocation site and the mailing addresses of each property owner. (4) A petition signed by 75 percent of the property owners within 300 feet of the proposed relocation site, approving the relocation. 45.03. HEARING. The application together with the material requested above shall be referred to the Council who shall set a time and place for a public hearing giving at least ten days published notice of such hearing. Mailed notice shall go to all property owners within 300 feet of the relocation site. 45.04. STATE BUILDING CODE. All of the provision of Chapters 59 and 60 will be app =cable to the building to be moved and said building shall conform to the provisions of said chapters prior to moving into Mounds View. 45.05. MOVING OF BUILDING. If, under a permit from the State or County Highway Department, a building is to be moved through, but not from or to the Municipality, the requirements of this chapter shall not be imposed, but the person moving the building shall before entering Mounds View notify in writing the Building Inspector of his intentions to do so, setting forth in such notice the number of the permit issued to him by the State or County Highway Department. 45.06. FEES. In addition to all fees provided by this code the applicant shall pay all expenses of inspection outside of Mounds View including thirty cents a mile, mileage, and $15 per hour traveling time. (15, 48, 62) MEMO TO: The Mounds View CiLy C FROM: Bruce K. Anderson, Dir Parks, Recreation and DATE: October 21, 1982 RE: Resolution No. 1506 Regarding the winter skating program at Groveland Park Enclosed is a copy of Resolution No. 1506 which outlines the City Council's position regarding the use of volunteer leadership for the winter skating program at Groveland Park. As can be noted, staff is proposing that we do not directly deliver a check to the Groveland Park Foundation but rather we establish a separate fund which would be dedicated to park improvement projects at Groveland Park. In addition, the resolution states that the City Council endorses the concept of residential involvement at their local neighborhood park but stresses that point that the local park system is for all Mounds View residents to enjoy. As I have briefly discussed this issue with one of the representatives from the Groveland Park Foundation and they do not envision any major problems with this type of arrangement. Once again, should you have any questions regarding this issue feel free to contact staff dir- ectly at extension 141. BKA/sll RESOLUTION NO. 1506 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RCSOLUTION ENDORSING TIIE GROVELAND PARK FOUNDATION CONCEPT OF VOLUNTEERING AS WINTER SKATING ATTENDANTS AT GROVELAND PARK WHEREAS, the Groveland Park Foundation has requested permis- sion to serve as volunteers at the Groveland Park shelter building during the winter skating season; and WHEREAS, the City of Mounds View was scheduled to hire two skating rink attendants for 296 hours of supervision time at Grove - land Park; and WHEREAS, the Groveland Park Foundation has agreed to provide competent adult leadership during the winter skating season; and WHEREAS, the Groveland Park Foundation leadership will abide by all of the existing City procedures and winter skating policies; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Mounds View does hereby heartily support and endorse the ef- forts of the Groveland Park neighborhood to provide volunteer leader- ship during the winter skating season at Groveland Park. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Mounds View hereby establish a separate fund account of $1,110.00 which was budgeted for supervision at the site to be dedicated for park im- provement projects at Groveland Park. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Mounds View encourages other community residents to support their local park system and neighborhood park as the Groveland Park Foundation has. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council endorses the concept of residential involvement at their local neighborhood park which improves and enhances the local park system for all Mounds View City residents to enjoy. Adopted this 25th day of October, 1982. ATTEST; MAYOR (SEAL) CLERK -ADMINISTRATOR AGRl3liMBNT MR; ^ Por value rr.ceivud, I hromisa to pay to the City of Mounds View ( Pour 'Thousand 'Three Hundred TwonT.y Five. Dollars and Twenty Cents ($4,325.20) with interest thurcon at the rate of 12% per annum from Q)is date, payable in monthly installments of not less than $300.00 including interest. The entire balance, if any, shall be paid 011 or before duly 15, 1983. Should any payment be in default, then the entire balance shall be immediately clue and payable without notice. The maker herein agrees to pay all expenses relative to the collection of the amount due including costs and attorney's fees. Il. the final payment is not received by July 15, 1983, then the City of. Mounds View may exercise any of its legal rights including the right to assess any amount due plus interest and costs as part of the taxes for ..Programmed Land First Add'n. Blk 1, Lt 2 Property Identification Number 59-59500-010-02-01 (loyal description) Dated (signature) t (address) -) S� (-�--'-l23`1n (phone) • lqt,",ol,uTn)li Nu,1509 r L ' �4iry CITY t1F MOIIFIIcl VIKM COUNTY of Iii INtEY :;TATI: OF MIIINP.'lO'I'A APPROVING JUL;T /1141) CnBRItC1' CLAIM ArATIJ,iI' CITY PIINUr YllII'll .M) I.ho Cil.' ISnnudl of Moaads Viow, parnuant to hfinuc:utl.a ;;t.al.tacn :,1.'..:;1, I:as 1'nl) :wl.horilY ovor Qw, financial affairs of I.hc CiI.Y and; 1YIII{ILEA.';. Tht• laity Comv!11 has n-viewed the chiles Timbers. 17852_ tlu out;i _ lZ�l_- ill 6he :menaU. of :6 31, 955.37 10115_ tlu'nut;h-1.91gg..._. ill I,11v +nnhluul. of It 64,728_77 Llu•out;h iu Lhv nnvnuil• ul' :6 Llu•ough iu t.h,::wnutot I' :¢ T(TPAL MOUNT OF MAW; ITFO?NTRU :I' 96,684.14 nud has found :aid el imr to be ,)ant aid corrccl.; (list of nny ercrption ) NOW Till-AIb'FORP, he it. resolved thal. I,he City Council of Mounds View Ilefeb,Y al!proved the attached lists of claims dated by the Vote -- ayes nayes ATTH:; I': Clcrk-Admiuit:tretor F, QITY OF M!'UNDS VII W A C" O U N T S PAY A Il 1. E DATE CHrCK4 A M 0 U 11 T C L A 1 M t N T P U IP C 017852 21,75 ICMA RETIPEMENT COPP D00S;. , 017P.54 79.00 SLIUU4DAN UTILITIES TRAIIIING 17A55 75.00 !'GNALD ORAGER CUNfr�'ENf,�' T 017856 560.00 9DY SCOUT TROOP 400 GRAN': • .11 To - 011A�8 ??i.CA TCHA RETIREMENT COMP PENSIONS M 017459 28,1sr, .53 FIPST STATE HANK OF SALARTESt i�r!;ULV w _- AND-CALAR1t:5o FbIllOART-T p AND-OVERTIPIr., RV ILA@ -__-: AND-P4OGRAN INSTI I;TORS ANO.OTNER TRUFES:[ONAL EERY 017960 29221.a! STATE ?REr.S - P E P A FFN$TONS 1 017861 464.00 CYNTHIA R. JOHNSON PROGRAM INSIFLCT'•S A 3155.t7 NECESSARY EXPENDITURES SINCE LAST CO ON MEE11Ar ' i -y —�, CITY IV MCUlIC"a VTF.W r. C G V N T S P A Y A C L E LAIL 1U-26-67 UAG! 2 I' cHEc1c• AMouHT cLA 1MA N' PukPosr 010L15 9.38 AMCRICAN LINEN ;UPPLY CO GLEANING-rpWt.1.; • 'AGS ' 010116 196.50 AQUAZY']E MTOWEST SATELLITES 010117 484,14 3rlw-rFMAN FFSTTVI71C5 PMPt:°ION 010118 197.70 RRIGHTON VETF!,'TNA?Y !+0-r CTHER FROrE-',jVtjtL SERV N fl 010119 431.177 COPY DUPLICATING PRO!? RENTAL, EGUI!IMENT _ !� 010120 ---------- 4?.72 CCTENS INC ' MOTOR FUELS tU?:'ICANIS - 1 •I - 010121 113.20 DATA OISPATCH INC C.QNT. SUE'.•.. "'El:':fiRY �: s! 'y 7 010122 19 983. 45 DATA OPERATIONS, INC. CONT. SVCS., III Y i'UNCH`-___ ! ! _010123 423.c.8 rF.LEC'.RIC MOTOF SPEC INC REPAIRS. UTTI.t!jr. - 010124 369.il0 MAMELF RECREATION CO INC SUPDLIES.CPF,'.IpiG `i 010125 It363.6.1 JOHN S JOHNSON AOMIN. CHARGFS PAYABLE •' ANO-OTHER PROFrreTONAL SERV ` ---- -- --- ANO-SUPPLIr', UTILITIES i •..: 010126 105.12 LILLIE SUBUROAN NEYS n LEGAL NOTICE >:w 0 10 12 7 ",r5 LONG LAKE 66 SUPPLIES; VEHICLE 010128 12,00 MP SUPPLY CD SUPPLIES900F�'ATING • O 6I 010129 177.00 MPPA CONFCP.ENCES i- S 010130 163.01 HECA SPORTSWEAR SUPPLIES90PE?47I14. - k e ' 01013L 27�688.94 MVTOO HASTE CONTROL COMM R E F U N 0 II AND -METRO WVTV ; ; NT ,-. 1 0!0l32 163.10 MIr+NCStlT4 TO PC INC SUPPLIES, F.OUINFrNT ANO-EQUIPMENT 010133 :', 70 'J 0I ;; VIEW OUR OWN HOWE SUPPLIES,GPERi,TING ie• 4— 014134 180.29 N W SELL TELEPHONE CO COMMUNICATIONS- TELEPHONE 010135 59.25 NOV`HCRN DOLT + TOOL CC SUPPLIES,OPERA-ING -- ANO-CUPPLIES, UTILITIES •� 011136 59018.81 NOPTHCPN STATt! PONEk CO - -- -- -5 f:LECTT ICILY AHO-NATURAL GAS -- -- - A1117-'.TkEEt LIGHTS y ' _ AND-TP.AFFIC SI04`3 -_ r T,, y ITY OF HOUNDS V[! H :. CMr.'CKM A M 0 U CI'll 37 �;� 010138 T �„� 010140 39061.15 78.05 1A,00 4t951,03 35,30 66.00 42.14 ',;p_ 010144 2939pt. 54 ®T 010145 40-°0 010146 5.aP, .. 01�147 192.r,0 «'`. 01014A 6t973.5A 010149 9h.00 i J_ 0101.50 3.90 � l 010151 470,00 — —711P152 9.1.18 O11'153 10.00 CS?1r,4 96.97 01017, It 190.16 01.0156 120."O 010157 15.60 L A I ri i. N ' NORTHERN STAiIS POKER 1407THFFN :TAT[; POIIFR RAMSFY COUNTY PTA,C RAMSCY COUNTY 'RCA -,UREA ROAO RUNNEP PARCEL SER PAHFLA 5 ROSF 3 T OFFICE PRODUCTS '.HOR.H ELLIOTT AND SMTTH LUMBER CO ,,kYOERS OFUG STORES CITY OF SPRING LAKE PARK 51'91!JG LK PAW: FIRE DEFT TSB COMPUTER, SERVICE H R TOLL COMPANY U S POSTMASTER VFNOURG TIPF 00 WASTE -ISPOFAL F.NGINEEP HATER PRODUCTS co CITY OF HHITF REAR LAKE Kt. - T+• FOL° Y ;A" iA,F DATE Jr-2C-A, PIf,F 3 P U R P 0 S F. ELECTRIC!T aan-rlatu� r,i :.As SUPPLIESt F(.L[PP'NT ANO-EL EC TcITY TRAINING CONT. SVCCNTY AN0-00MPUI;TGITI0, TELEPHONE ANO-REPAIRS, UTILITIES - --- CONT. SVC, -- f-EL!VERY ,. SALAPIEFt'^"I tGA(!'-TIME HIMEO SUPPLIES ANfI-HI SC CFFICF '1P15-1 $ , 07HFR PROFC,SIOM1AL SEAM SUPPLIESt F!L0,;S16RNOS MISC OFFICE S11PPLiES fi COILGCTIOKS-`.7HfP (•PANTS • SU? [DIES IITHE? PkOFES` I(1NAL" $ Pr NTAL. IrLl7P'4ENT POSTAGE SUPPLIES, EOUINNE NT'F_....` ANO-REPAIRS E UIPN O•HEP PROFESAONAL SERV SUPPLTESt UTILITIES SALARIE„ aE :'1LART1s'° '3Yr"�� AMO-PENSIONS `"fit _ AND•F.(.C.A. ANO-kORKFPS CCMPENSATION PROGRAM INSTk•JCTORS -' k SUPPLTF.StOPERATING CITY OF HCUNCS VIEW A C (7 0 L N T S P A Y A D L E DATE 10-2fi.62 PAGE C14rrK v A M 0 U N T CLAItAti-l' p U R p a ! F 0101,8 521.30 GrNFRAL MIMLINTC.ITIONIS SUPPLIES, %P(sS4(,PN DS AND -REPAIRS, tq.UIFOHENj zq MISR 20,P9 Pr F?,` I i'F -114 L Lt INC S CPnL I ES t CP FRAT 1116 • of 0160 13P.I) � U ', •-,&P!ES TNr SUPPLIESoCF". x olpt6l. 7?s 79 �y TPON ALLOYS �OPF SUPPLIES,CF. TINfi 010t62 230.00 J WALE" COAR REPAIRS, Frj:TFHF-I- 01.0163 600000 TNDUSTPIAL UTILITIES INO REF U rl r 010164 13,00 CONNIE TOFFLI R E F U N 4 �:71 010165 145,50 NICK 04P900 P.OGPOJ INSTRUCTORS 910166 do CHARLES BETTS NF.FUNLIS 11.1167 149000 KATHY BRAGER PROGRAM TN!iT,ZUCT(-S 181.50 JFFF GAFFKF PROGRAM IN"tRUrr2S C0169 169.00 GILMAN GRODEP6 PROGRAM INSTPQrT-lr-S 'RIM m 010170 174,00 RALPH HANGGI Sq PROGRAM INSTi111C'(M r.j^171 153.50 MCC JOHNSOM PROGRAH INSTRUCTORS C10172 114.00 svr KARDFLL PrOGRAM I N S I Ril C-1 0 P. S 010173 4no00 DAVID LARSON REFUNDS 011174 151@50 PAT MICHNA PROGRAM INSTRUCTORS M175 1711,rig Mr A AN LLrP PROGRAM rNST 15 01.006 49,00 SONG HUI PARK 010177 30000 ALVrRMIA ROEHLF9 RFFUM,''.* 010178 40. 00 RC -MY CONSTRUCTION CO prrU%,j!; 010179 163,00 ALIT,': SrHLICHTMAIIII PROGRAM INST,.l.r1ok5 0 it, In 0 151,00 LYNN SCHLINTMANN PROGRAM INSTRUCTORS 300on HAROLD SMPf, REFUNDS 0 IM 2 503.00 DAN SHITH PPOGRAM INSTRUCTORS M ,�. CI Y OF r,ruU: VI'14 p C y i t' u _ P A Y A 0 L C �: (4E ^K • T. M 0 U ri T C L A I H A is T P u R P 0 S 010183 100.a0 JOHNON PLASTICS = 71n1A4 13.00 PATRICIA JULKOkSKT R F F U N p a In185 170.00 FFAPICINC BnRP 1r.OG At, IN,T 1,CTn•S .0 U aIn1A6 144.00 PAUL GIVol: PPOGF.AM INnT-LCTn15 '"*} . W 187 120.00 JE9RV HAFFCHAR PPOGn'AM INS1tNCi0i'S - ------ Q .. e U1e188 iP.3.s0 JOnNrtF KOSLOLIK PPOGRnN INST-ICiC�<S NI .I 010189 30.00 t1AOK SILVIS PROGRAM INS? .4CTU 5 75 64,728. 77 CHECKS WPITTEN TOTAL OF 83 CHECKS TOTAL 96,584.14 ag ORDINANCE NO. 326 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF MOUNDS VIEW BY AMENDING CHAPTER 107, ENTITLED "BINGO" The Council of the City of Mounds View does hereby ordain: Section I. Chapter 107 of the Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: (see attached amendment) Section II. This ordinance shall take effect 30 days after the date of its publication. Read by the Council of the City of Mounds View on the day of , 1982. Read and passed by the Council of the City of Mounds View on this day of , 1982. ATTEST: Mayor (SEAL) Clerk -Administrator APPROVED AS TO FORM: { City Attorney CHAPTER 107 j BINGO, RAFFLES, AND GAMBLING DEVICES 107.01 Provisions of State Law Adopted. The provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 349.11 through 349.23 re atina to the -tabs or ticket jars and lotteries are his chapter as if set out in full. In his chapter shall apply to the conduct use of such gambling devices within th ie97e1 107.02 Permit Required. The game of "bingo", raffles, and the use of gambling devices, as hereinafter defined, is hereby declared illegal unless the permit hereinafter provided for is first obtained and all requirements hereinafter specified are fully complied with. 107702 107.03 Definitions. the-game-ubingeu-is-de€ined-as The they occur in this ohaPter shall be Per-khe-pnrpeses-a€-6his-eheg6er followngiwords and terms wherever defined as follows: (1) Bingo - a popular modern variation of "Keno" or "Lotto", where each player has a card or board containing five horizontal rows all but the central one containing five figures, the central row having four figures with the word "free" marked in the center thereof; any combination of five in a row whether horizontal, vertical or otherwise when completed by a player constitutes "bingo", and the central row either horizontal, vertical, or otherwise constitutes "bingo" when its four numbers are announced and covered. A wheel or other mechanical device may be used by any person conducting the game of "bingo", and any such person may award either money or merchandise to any player or players first completing any combination entitling such player or players to call "bingo". (2) Gambling Devices - Those gambling devi^es known as paddle- wheels, tipboards, pull -tabs (or ticket jars) or apparatus use S. Paddlewheel - A wheel marked off one or more numbe uses a Pointer or sections contain turned or spun. 107.03 oils out of every set of pull -tabs (or ticket jar will have been designated in advance and at ran om as prizegnners, A participant pays a consideration to an operator for the opportunity to obtain a folded or band ticket or a card, view the numbers or symbo s on it, an ar number 5) Raffle - A game in which a participant buys a ticket or a chance at a prize with the winner determined by a random rawing to take place at a location and date printed upon the icket. - "- 6) Tipboard - A board, placed or other device measuring at east 12 inches square, marked off in a grid or columns, in hich each section contains a hidden number or numbers, or I9�:93 107.04 Application. Any religious, charitable, fraternal or other association not organized for pecuniary profit, which has been in existence for at least three years, has at least 15 active members, and duly existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota, desiring to conduct said-game-and-the-playing-thereef a bingo game or raffle or use gambling devices shall make application for a permit therefor to the Council. ' 109�704 107.05 Application Form. The application herein provided for sFa_1T_be in the form specified by the Clerk -Administrator. 104705 107.06 Verification. The application shall be verified by a duly authorized officer of the association and also by the person charged by the association with conducting and supervising said game; and both such applicants shall be responsible for the proper conduct and operation of the game and for compliance with the provisions of all pertinent statutes, ordinances and regulations of any governmental agency pertaining to the conduct of playing of said game and the premises upon which the said game is conducted. 104:96 107.07 Permit Fees. The application shall be submitted together: with the permit fees established by resolution of the City Council for all dates of operation of proposed "bingo" games for a Period of one year to the Clerk -Administrator for presentation to the Council. f99:97 107.08 Information Required. The application shall state the date or and the hours thereof for which permission to play the game is requested, and the applicant association shall not conduct said game at any other time than the hours and date or dates specified in the application. 107-98 107.09 Council Action. After presentation of the application and the fees as herein provided, the Council shall, in its discretion, either grant or deny the same. 107.10 1047eg 107.10 Restrictions. No permit shall be issued allowing the-gnme a bingo game or raffle to be conducted or gambling devices used by the applicant association more than one day a week on same premises or for a longer period than four consecutive hours on any one day within a period of more than one year from the date the permit is issued. }8}716 107.11 Refunds. After an application has been granted, no refund of the fees hereunder taxed shall be made. 164711 107.12 Sole Purpose. No such association shall rent, lease, or occupy any property for the sole purpose of conducting such game-er bingo game(s) or raffle or using gambling devices. 187712 107.13 Persons Conducting. Only members of the applicant assoc— iat on shall be permitted to conduct the game biro games or raffle or use gambling devices and no person shall be paid or given any remuneration for conducting such game bingo game or raffle or using gambling devices. 164-13 107.14 Change of Officers. If, subsequent to the issuance of the permit there shall be a change of officers of the association or of the manager of the game(s), the license conferred by the permit shall be void until such change or changes shall have been brought to the attention of, and approved by, the Clerk Administrator. S 104714 107.15 Free Lunches. No free lunches, food or merchandise shall be offered or given, nor shall other inducements for game participation be made by anyone. 167.15 107.16 Revocation. No nermittee shall have a vested right in any permit hereto, and such permit may be revoked in the event the permittee shall violate or cause to be violated any of the provisions of this chapter, or of the statutes relating to ubingeu-games bingo and gambling devices, or of any state law, ordinance, or regulation pertaining to the conduct of said game or to the premises on which it shall be conducted, or in the event the applicant shall be guilty of any misrepresentation in the application. 1V 16 107.17 Proceeds. The proceeds arising from the conducting of "bingo" games, raffles or operating gambling machines shall not inure to the profit of any individual. 104:1; 107.18 Books and Inspection. The permittee association shall at all ti es keep proper books and records showing the gross receipts from the operation of the said games, raffles or machines and the net receipts thereof to the permittee association, and all U 107.18 other pertinent matters related to the proceeds of and distribution of receipts from -said -game; and the permittee shall at all reasonable times permit access by the Council and police officers to all such books and records which shall be kept by the officers of the permittee for a period of at least one year. In the event of an audit the permittee shall pay the reasonable expenses of such audit based on the minimum per diem rates charged by a public accountant or certified public accountant. 184718 107.19 Penalty. Any person, firm, corporation, or association guilty of any misrepresentation in an application for a ubingeu permit or otherwise violating or causing to be violated any provision of this chapter shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. (23, 188) \,Jvmn RESOLUTION NO. 1507 CITY OF MOUNDS VIA!': COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION REQUESTING RAMSEY COUNTY IMPLEMENT PUBLIC SAFETY ACTIONS UPON REQUEST OF CTTY COUNCIL ONLY WHEREAS, The Board of Ramsey County Commissioners adopted Resolution No. 82-719 on August 23, 1982 ordering the placement of "No Parking" signs on County Road I from Long Lake Road to Jackson Drive; and WHEREAS, said Resolution was considered after receipt of a request from the City of Mounds View for such action; and WHEREAS, said letter was sent by the staff member signing the letter without the knowledge or approval of the Mounds View City Council; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Mounds View City Council that The Board of Ramsey County Commissioners not take action on public safety matters within and at the request of the City of Mounds View without being assured that such action has the full support and approval of the Mounds View City Council. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Mounds View City Council that The Board of Ramsey County Commissioners is requested to implement public safety actions within and at the request of the City of Mounds View only after receiving a certified copy of the Resolution approving such request. Adopted this 25th day of October, 1982. ATTEST: Mivnr (SEAL) Clerk -Administrator J,tc,ln-) ► MEMO TO: The Mounds View City Co uncil r� FROM: Bruce K. Anderson, Parks, Recreation DATE: October 21, 1982 RE.: 1983 Specifications for the City Newsletter Enclosed are copies of staff's proposed specifications for pub- lishing six City Newsletters for 1983. The specifications basically remain the same as last year with three minor changes. The changes that staff is proposing are as follows: 1. The bid would be awarded on a twenty-four page format with the exception of the May -June issue which will consist of thirty-six pages. The change from last year on this is we bid two thirty-six page issues rather than just the one that we are bidding this year. i 2. We have increased the size of the newsletter from 7" x 11" to 8;" x 11". The reasoning for this is that apparently it is the same price for the 8�"xll" as it is for a 7"xll" and it is much easier for staff to prepare the newsletter on regular paper stock. 3. We have indicated that we are expecting an eight day turn around from the time the camera ready copy is delivered to the time it is returned to the City, and we have assessed a penalty of $100/day for each day that the newsletter is not completed during that purposed time period. This is double the cost from last year for the penalty charge with staff's reason- ing being that time is often of the essence in getting the City Newsletter out and we feel a stiffer penalty will insure us a better delivery date. In addition, we have just projected time schedules for this year rather than staking specific dates as to when the City Newsletter must be delivered which will give the City a little more flexibility in preparing the copy should any pressing issues arise. Should you -2- have any questions regarding the specifications, feel free to contact staff directly at extension #41. BKA/sll 1 4 ,I } J`I I SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLISHING SIX CITY NEWSLETTERS CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW NOVEMBER 9, 1982 ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR PUBLISHING SIX CITY NEWSLETTERS FOR THE CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW, MINNESOTA The City Council of Mounds View will receive sealed bids for the publishing of six (6) City Newsletters. Bids will be re- ceived until 10:30 a.m. C.S.T., on Wednesday, November 24, 1982 at the City Hall, 2401 Highway 10, Mounds View, Minnesota at which time and place the bids shall be opened, read aloud, and considered. Proposal forms, including specifications, are on file and may be obtained at the office of the Mounds View Parks, Recreation and Forestry Department. Proposals must be made on the forms as furnished, and shall be submitted to the Parks, Recreation and Forestry Department on or before the time stated above. Proposals must be placed in a sealed envelope with an indication thereon stating "proposal for publishing of six City Newsletters contained herein", and addressed to the City of Mounds View, 2401 Highway 10, Mounds View, Minnesota 55112. All bids must be accompanied by a cash deposit, certified check, or bid bond, payable to the City of Mounds View, in the amount equal to five percent (58) of the total bid. The City Council reserves the right to accept or reject any or all bids, to waive any informalities in the bid, and to make such award as it may deem to be in the best interest of the City. Donald F. Pauley Clark -Administrator City of Mounds View PUBLISH: NEW BRIGHTON BULLETIN REVIEW: November 11, 1982 INSTRUCTION TO BIDDERS Bidders are required to submit their bids in accordance with the following conditions: PROPOSAL The bidder shall submit his proposal on forms as furnished in these specifications. Only proposals which are submitted on the original form attached hereto will be considered. The City reserves the right to reject any or all proposals and to waive irregularities and informalities therein and further reserves the right to award the contract in its best interests. The bidder may view past copies of the newsletter upon request. BID SECURITY No proposals shall be considered unless accompanied by a cash deposit, certified check or bid bond in the amount of five per- cent (5%) of the tendered bid. All forms of bid guarantee shall be made payable to the City of Mounds View. The bid guarantee of unsuccessful bidders will be returned following action by the City on the award of the contract, and to the success- ful bidder upon execution of contract. In case the successful bidder fails to execute such contract within ten (10) days after the date of the award, the amount of his bid guarantee shall be forfeited to the City of Mounds View as liquidated damages. NET BID Net bid shall be for furnishing the units as specified. DELIVERY The number of days necessary to complete publication will be a determining factor in making the award. PAYMENT Payment in full, for the publication received, shall be made by the City within thirty (30) days of completion of each of the six publi- cations, acceptance by the City and receipt of itemized billing from the vendor. Billing shall be made on a per page cost. J SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLISHING SIX CITY NEWSLETTERS FOR THE CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW, MINNESOTA NO. 1 GENERAL These specifications contemplate the printing and publishing for the City of Mounds View six (6) newsletters on a bi-monthly basis for the year 1983. The bid will be awarded on a twenty-four (24) page format, with the exceptions of the May/June issue.which will consist of thirty-six (36) pages, and should be bid per page. The bidder shall furnish only the highest quality materials and work- manship. Failure to do this will be cause for rejection. The bidder shall show ability to supply artwork, graphics, photo reproduction, layout, proof reading, pickup and delivery, and storage. The bidder shall be required to show proof of past performance of publishing comparable to that requested by the City. Bids not complying with these specifications will be rejected. If �- additional features are incorporated at no cost to the City, they may be noted on the proposal form, but they will not be treated as substitu- tions for required features. The first issue will be delivered to the City of Mounds View in mid -December, 1992. NO. 2 PAPER STOCK The Newsletter shall be 8h inches by 11 inches. The paper shall be off-white in color, 60k basis weight with sufficient coating to repro- duce well via offset process on solids and half -tones. NO. 3 INK The ink used to print will be a different color for each Newsletter. The colors of ink to be used are normal PMS numbers. NO. 4 STAPLING AND FOLDING Each Newsletter will be folded to the 8; inch by 11 inch size as previously described and saddle -stitched. NO. 5 TIME OF DELIVERY The bidder will supply an eight (8) work day delivery to the City of Mounds View upon receipt of the camera-ready copy. NO. 6 LATE CHARGE The bidder shall be assessed a penalty of $100.00/day for each day after the newsletter is not completed and delivered to the City Hall after the eight (8) work day period. NO. 7 COPY VARIANCE The City of Mounds View will provide camera-ready copy with some exceptions such as half -tones, photographs, graphs, etc. Each bidder should bid his costs for these additional services beyond the price/page on the form provided. NO. 8 COPY CHANGES The City of Mounds View will assume finanical responsibility for any copy changes or corrections that are requested by the City. NO. 9 PROJECTED TIME SCHEDULE Printer's Final Brochure Months City Material to Printer Copy to the City January/February March/April May/June July/August September/October November/December December 3, 1982 February 4, 1983 April 1, 1983 June 3, 1983 August 5, 1983 October 7, 1983 December 15, 1982 February 16, 1983 April 13, 1983 June 15, 1983 August 17, 1983 October 19, 1983 PROPOSAL FORM FOR PUBLISHING OF SIX CITY NEWSLETTERS FOR THE CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW MOUNDS VIEW, MINNESOTA 55112 To Whom It May Concern: In accordance with the advertisement of the City, we propose to furnish and deliver six (6) City Newsletters on a bi-monthly basis, in accordance with the specifications on file in the Mounds View Parks, Recreation and Forestry Department at the price shown: NOTE: BID PRICE MUST BE GIVEN IN BOTH WORDS AND NUMBERS UNIT #1 - COST PER PAGE FOR PRINTING OF SIX CITY NEWSLETTERS, 4,400 COPIES EACH PRINTING. UNIT #2 - COSTS FOR ADDITIONAL SERVICES. HALF TONES: 0 DOLLARS $ DOLLARS $ PHOTOGRAPHS: /100 DOLLARS $ ART REDUCTIONS: /100 DOLLARS $ ADDITIONAL ART WORK/HOUR /100 DOLLARS $ !" Enclosed herewith find (cash deposit) (certified check) (bidder's bond) in the amount of $ being at least five percent (5%) of the amount of our proposal, made payable to the City of Mounds View as a proposal guarantee which it is agreed by the undersigned, will be forfeited in the event that the contract is not executed if awarded to the undersigned, REMARKS: NAME OF FIRM BY ITS TITLE ADDRESS ' DATED: WITNESSED: ORDINANCE NO. 320 I� CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF MOUNDS VIEW BY AMENDING CHAPTER 2G, ENTITLED "PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS" The Council of the City of Mounds View does hereby ordain: SECTION I. Chapter 26.10, Subdivision 2, Adoption; Interest, is amended as follows: Subdivision 2. Adoption; Interest. At such meeting or at any adjournment thereof the Council shall hear and pass upon all objections to the proposed assessment, whether presented orally or in writing. The Council may amend the proposed assessment as to any parcel and by resolution adopt the same as the special assessment against the lands named in the assessment roll. Notice of any adjournment of the hearing shall be adequate if the minutes of the meeting so adjourned show -� the time and place, when and where the hearing is to be continued, or if three days notice thereof be published in the newspaper. The assessment, with accruing interest, shall be a lien upon all private and public property included therein, from the date of the resolution adopting the assessment, concurrent with the general taxes; but the lien shall not be enforceable against public property as long as it is publicly owned, and during such period the assessment shall be recoverable from the owner of such property only in the manner and to the extent provided in Chapter 26.16. Except as provided below, all assessments shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over such period, not exceeding thirty years, as the resolution determines, payable on the first Monday in January in each year, but the number of install- ments need not be uniform for all assessments l a •_ ,_ __- n crr • uucu iu u binyac SC.......t criterion for determining the number of installments is provided by the resolution. The first install- ment of each assessment shall be include8 in the first tax rolls completed after its adoption and shall be payable in the same year as the taxes ORDINANCE NO. 320 Page Two 1 contained therein; except that the payment of the first installment of any assessment levied upon unimproved property may be deferred until a designated future year or until the platting of the property or the construction of improve- ments thereon, upon such terms and conditions and based upon such standards and criteria as may be provided by resolution of the Council. In any event, every assessment, the payment of which is so deferred, when it becomes payable, shall be divided into a number of installments such that the last installment thereof will be payable not more than thirty years after the levy of the assessment. All assessments shall bear interest at such rate as the resolution determines, not exceeding B-per-eenb-per-annum the maximum permitted glaw, except that the rate may in any event equal e average annual interest rate on bonds issued to finance the improvement for which the assessments are levied. To the first installment of each assessment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from a date specified in the resolution levying the assessment, not earlier than the date of the resolution, until December 31 of the year in which the first installment is payable, and to ll each subsequent installment shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments; or, alternatively, any assessment may be made payable in equal annual installments including principal and interest, each in the amount annually required to pay the principal over such period with interest at such rate as the resolution determines, not exceeding the maximum period and rate specified above. In the latter event, no prepayment shall be accepted under Subdivision 3 without payment of all installments due to and including December 31 of the year of prepayment, together with the original principal amount rarinron enl.. �.• ��- amounts of principal included in such installments, computed on an annual amortization basis. When payment of an assessment is deferred, as authorized in this subdivision, interest thereon for the period of deferment may be made payable annually at the same times as the principal installments of the assessment would have been payable if not deferred; or interest for this period may be added to the principal amount of the assessment when it J ORDINANCE NO. 320 `age Three becomes payable; or, if so provided in the resolution levying the assessment, interest thereon to December 31 of the year before the first installment is payable may be forgiven. SECTION II Chapter 26.05, Subdivision 5, Petition By All Owners, is amended as follows Subdivision 5. Petition By All Owners. Whenever all owners of real property abuttiny upon any street named as the location of any improvement shall petition the Council to construct the improvement and to assess the entire cost against their property, the Coun- cil may, witheat after a public hearing, adopt a resolution determining such facts and order- ing the improvement. SECTION III This ordinance shall take effect 30 days after the date of its publication. Read by the Council of the City of Mounds View on this ay of 1982. Mead and passed by the Council of the City of Mounds View this day of , 1982. ATTEST: (SEAL) Mayor Clerk -Administrator CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW CITY COUNCIL Agenda Session November 1, 1982 7:00 p.m. Presentation of findings of Cost/Benefit Study by Gunnar Isberg. Discussion of Northwest Suburban Youth Service Bureau. Consideration of proposed amendments to Municipal Code Chapter 40, regarding Home Occupations (material provided in 10/25/82 packet). Consideration of proposed amendments to Municipal Code Chapter 42, Subdivision Regulations (material provided in 10/25/82 packet). Consideration of Subdivision and Rezoning on 8495 Red Oak Drive (material provided in 10/25/82 packet). Discussion of Rdgewood Community Center parking with Police Chief Grabowski. Consideration of Request for Proposal specifications for propane conversions and fuel supply. 4�� GUNNAR ISBERG AND ASSOCIATES rti P.O.Box 115, 51414 Division at., Northfield, mn. 5505 18121333.1999 To: Mounds View city Wetlands' Committee From: Pat Allen Date: October 15, 1982 Re: Fiscal Impact Analysis Study Enclosed please find a summary of the revenues generated by develop— ment type as we discussed earlier. I have added a sixth develop— ment mix as requested. Comments regarding expenditures projected by development type are also included for your review. I look forward to our meeting on Monday, November 1. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (507) 663-1335. 1 Planning and Development Services Fiscal Impact Analysis - Revenues A summary of revenues generated by various types of development is provided in Table I. The information presented to the Wetland Com- mittee earlier this year is summarized and sythesized. In addition, the Committee had asked to see the revenues generated by a sixth development type - Commercial Strip: Residential Multi Family Mix. Please note that the development type generating the most revenues is Commercial Shopping Center. In order of descending revuene gen- erations (city share) are the following developments: I. Commercial Shopping Center $191,133.00 2. Multi -Family Residential (R-4) $176,830.00 3. Mix: Commerial and R-4 $116,705.00 4. Industrial/Office $101,684,00 5. Townhouses (R-3) $100,207.00 6. Single Family (R-1) $39,494.00 Table I - Summary: Revenues Generated by Development Type Tax Revenues Development Number Avg. Cost Total Costs Generated Per Taxes Generated Type of Units per unit all Units Unit/Total City School R-1 Single Family 156 $80,000 $12,480,000 $1,614*/ $39,494 $125,128 $251,715 R-3 Town- houses 471 $70,000 $32,970,000 $1,356*/ $100,207 $317,481 $638,667 R-4 Multi - Family 807 $40,000 $32,240,000 $1,398/ $176,830 $560,244 $1,127,025 Industrial/ Office 1 - $21,060,378-/$855,628 $101,684 $322,135 Fix: C-2 Strip Commercial 1** - $6,000,000 $243,764/ $28,967 $91,774 $24;1,764 R-4 Multi Family 400 $40,000 $16,000,000 $1,398/ $87,738 $277,978 $559,200 Total $22,000,000 $809,964 $116,705 $369,752 Commercial Shopping Center l - $39,589,941 -/ $191,133 $605,558 $1,608,436 (1) * Includes homestead credit. ** 100,000 square feet total one unit. Fiscal Impact Analysis — Expenditures The intent of the tables on the following pages is to attempt to predict the public governmental costs of increased public service demands ,due to various forms of residential and nonresidential growth. These tables project only the primary costs that might be incurred and the Immediate revenues that could be generated. These primary revenues include property taxes generated as a result of specific development by type. Primary costs include operating costs suelt as police and fire salaries needed to fulfill public demand for services. Secondary costs and benefits such as development influence on property values are not considered due to the diffi— culty in accurately assessing those costs and the potential for double counting the effects. Residential Development Expenditures Table 2 was developed using an analysis technique that can be used for residential development only. Toral annual expenditure and expenditures per capita are computed using methods developed for IIUD by the Center for Urban Policy Research at Rutger's University. Using this technique, specific costs per capita can be assigned to population generators. Demographic multipliers indicate the typical household size and numbers of students in a given type of dwelling unit. For example, a single family residence in this region will typically house 3.697 persons of whom 1.142 will be primary and/or secondary students. The total number of anticipated residents and students can be computed by multiplying the number of units by the multiplier. In addition, this fiscal impact method relies on information on estimated market valuation of real property as compiled by Ramsey County. This informaton points out the residential nature of the city of Mounds View. 1981 estimated market value of all parcels of real property in the eiLy of 'riuuuun View is y214,929,741.00. 0f that emniint apooximately 84% ($179,672,398.00) is single family residential with an addi— tional 9% ($18,848,537.00) estimated market value in apartments and mobile homes. There were 3,442 total parcels in Mounds View in 1981. Of these 3,298 were classified residential (single and two family homes), 57 were apartments with 702 units, and 5 are mobile home parks (579 units in 1982). 75 commercial parcels and 7 indus— trial parcels were valued at $16,409,006.00. Approximately 7% of the total estimated market value of the community is commercial and industrial. IF (2) Table 2 - Development Alternatives: Residential Ccat Analysis n Ile Capita Multiplier Method IToLal U of Demographic Residents/ Multipliers Students 2Annual Expenditures Development A of Household/ Generated Per Capita Generated Type " Units Students Development Municipal/ Schools* Single Family Residential R-1 156 3.697/1.142 577/178 Town- houses 471 3.015/0.544 1420/256 Multi -Family Residential R-4 806 Mix: Strip Commercial 1 1,515/0.136 1221/276 Multi Family R-2 400 1.515/0.136 606/ 54 $115/$3,047 $115/$3047 $115/$3,047 $115/$3,047 * Assumes 90% of students will attend public schools. I Demographic Multiplier times the number of units equals total number of residents/students. 2 Includes all funds. 3Tota1 Annu Expenditur Generated Municipal/ Schools $66,355/ $488,129 $163,300/ $702,028 $140,415/ $756,376 ?/T $69,690/ $164,538 3 Equals total residents/students multiplied by cost per resident/student. From Table 2 projected costs for municipal sarvices by development type suggest that each residential use generates significant service costs. Please note that the figures given are projected estimates that can be used to discuss relative cost, not specific dollar amounts. To compare the revenues generated to expenditures incurred by develop- ment type, the following Chart indicates the $cost/benefit comparison. Development Type R-1 R-3 R-4 Mix (R-4 portion only) Table 3 Municipal Revenues Generated $39,494.00 $100,207.00 $176,830.00 $87,738.00 Non -Residential Municipal Expenditures $66,355.00 $163,300.00 $140,415.00 $69,690.00 Typical costing techniques do not work well in projecting develop- ment costs for non-residential (commercial and industrial) develop- ment in Mounds View due to the residential nature of the city. Applying typical projection methods yield outrageously high munici- pal service cost projections for new commercial and industrial development. Of the three projection methods appropriate for this study, only one (Case Study) would have any validity for this analysis of commercial and industrial development impact. The Case Study method generally employs intensive site specific investigations to determine exact categories of excess or deficient public service capacity. These excesses or deficiencies are then added to or subtracted from estimates of operating and capital demands passed by growth for each municipal department. For example,) the park department director, Bruce Anderson, has indicated that the park maintenance program is currently understaffed. This deficiency in current staffing must be recognized prior to charging any new development with the cost of upgrading the staffing to accomodate such development. The basic data needed to conduct a Case Study analysis comes from estimates made by local municipal employees. These estimates depend on data collection systems that the City of Mounds View does not now use. For example, the police department collects data by geo- graphic sector not by land use type. Because the city's land use patterns do not fall neatly into geographic areas, it is difficult to make assumptions about various service costs depending on land use type. While there is no better method to use for detailed results, the Case Study method is complex and costly. It requires extensive data collection over a period of time with the assistance of sophisticated equipment. The Hounds View staff has supplied us with excellent data. However, since city records arc not kept by land use type, projections based on that data can be guesses at best. In order to obtain relatively accurate expenditures generated by commercial and industrial development, I feel that some additional$ information is needed from the city. The data required would have to be collected over a period of time lengthy enough to be repre- sentative. The type of information necessary might include: the (4) • nature, number and duration of police calls to single family residences, multi -family apartment buildings, and commercial and industrial businesses; and the collection of usage data on sewer and water from the various land use types. If Lite Wetlands CummiLLee Is Interested in having city staff develop the type of data mentioned above, I can proceed with my analysis of the fiscal impact on the commercial and industrial sectors. Without the data I would be"reluctant to attempt to pinpoint these costs due to the inability to use other acceptable analysis methods. The projected costs for the residential sectors can be considered rela- tively sound. However, the data is not adequate for the same accuracy for the commercial and industrial sectors. I look forward to our discussion on November 1. I would appreciate your direction in this matter. Thank you, 4 &&X") Pat Allen (5) q41%., d_ MEMO TO: Mayor and City Counc' FROM: Clerk-Administratq DATE: October 28, 1982 SUBJECT: NORTHWEST SUBURBAN YOUTH SERVICE BUREAU Pursuant to your direction, the referenced subject matter has been placed on the November 1, 1982 Agenda Session agenda for your discussion. Attached with this memorandum you will find the following information regarding the Northwest Suburban Youth Service Bureau: 1. An informational brochure prepared by the Youth Service Bureau for their potential clients. 2. A listing of the Board of Directors for the Youth Service Bureau. 3. A summary of the Northwest Suburban Youth Service Bureau staff. 4. Articles of Incorporation and By -Laws for the Northwest Suburban Youth Service Bureau. 5. The Joint Powers Agreement of the nine cities in Ramsey County who are contributing agencies and participants in the Northwest Suburban Youth Service Bureau. 6. A copy of the 1983 Program Budget for the Youth Service Bureau. After reviewing the attached information, should you have any not questions or require any additional information, please hesitate to let me know. DFP/pf Attachments NORTHWEST SUBURBAN YOUTH SERVICE BUREAU BOARD OF DIRECTORS SUMMARY CITY COUNCIL REPRESENTATION: 100�Mrs. Polly Franke (1) Polly is a new member of the Board as of Roseville City Council January, 1982. She is a member of the 1233 West County Road B Roseville City Council and acts as liaison Roseville, Mn. 55113 to the Council. Her interest in the Bureau (H) 631-1489 is shared by her husband, Jerry Franke, who was one of the early supporters of the Bureau. 2. Mrs. Connie Dickson (4) Connie is North Oaks City Council's North Oaks City Council Representative on the Board. Connie has 33 Deer Hills Drive been a member of the Board since 1978. She North Oaks, Mo. 55110 is a former school teacher with a strong (H) 482-9934 interest in young people. 3. Mrs. Janelle Dachtera (2) Janelle is the City of Lauderdale's Lauderdale City Council Representative on the Board of Directors. 1976 Malvern Street This is her second year on the Board. Lauderdale, Mn. 55113 Janelle is a registered nurse and has worked (H) 636-6554 for a number of years in adolescent mental health. As a parent, she is concerned that services such as the Bureau remain available. 4. Mr. Michael Fahey (4) Mike is a Council member and represents Little Canada City Council the City of Little Canada on the Board of 2923 LaBore Road Directors. He has been on the Board for Little Canada, Mo. 55109 four years. (H) 484-3261 (W) 726-2220 * 5. Mr. Don Hodges (6) Don is a Council member and represents the Mounds View City Council City of Mounds View on the Board. He has 5086 Eastwood Road been on the Youth Service Bureau Board for New Brighton, Ma, 55112 six years. Don has a long standing interest (H) 784-6284 in young people, and has been very active in (W) 296-0469 Boy Scouts. 6. Mr. Robert Benke (1) Bob is a Council member and represents the New Brighton City Council City of New Brighton on the Board. This 679 Continental Drive is Bob's first year on our Board. New Brighton, Mn. 55112 (H) 631-2022 (W) 297-2069 7. Mr. Tom Wegleitner (4) Tom is a member of the Shoreview City Council Shoreview City Council and represents them on our Board of Directors. 269 DeMar Avenue Tom has been a teacher in the Mounds View Shoreview, Mn. 55112 Schools for many years, and is'serving his (H) 484-5220 fourth year on our Board. (W) 633-4031 * 8. Willis Warkentien (7) Willis is the Mayor of Falcon Heights and Falcon Heights City Council represents that city on our Board of Directors. 1794 North Albert Willis has been on the Board since it began in Falcon Heights, Mn. 55113 1976 (7 years). (H) 644-2908 POLICE REPRESENTATION: 1. Deputy Marie Ballard (2) Marie represents the Sheriff's Department on Ramsey County Sheriff's Department the Board. She has been a member of the 3401 Rice Street Board for two years. She is interested in St. Paul, Mn, 55112 the services provided by the Bureau as the) (W) 481-1316 relate to her job. 2. Sergeant Fred Guy (4) Fred represents the Roseville Police Department Roseville Police Department on the Board. He has been on the Board of 2660 Civic,Center Drive Directors for 4 years and is interested in Roseville, Mn. 55113 assisting young people in the community. (W) 484-3371 3. Dave Brouiliet/John Ellickson (2) New Brighton Police Department 803 Fifth Avenue N.W. New Brighton, Mn. 55112 (W) 636-5050 * 4. Sergeant Tim Smith (7) Mounds View Police Department 2401 N.E. Highway 10 Mounds View, Mn. 55112 (H) 784-3385 (W) 784-3771 SCHOOL REPRESENTATION: * 1. Mr. Dan Beal (5) Roseville Area Schools Parkview, Middle School 701 West County Road B Roseville, Mn. 55113 (H) 488-2042 (W) 633-8150 Ext. 421 * 2. Vacant - Mounds View Area Schools PROBATION REPRESENTATION: Dave and John represent the New Brighton Police Department on the Board of Directors. Both are new to the Board, but have used the Bureau's services previously. Tim represents the Mounds View Police Department and has been on the Bureau's Board since its inception in 1976 (7 years). He is interested in the services the Bureau provides for youth in the community. Dan represents the Roseville Schools on our' Board of Directors. Dan is a Dean at Park,. Middle School and has served for five years on the Bureau's Board of Directors. He is concerned about seeking help for school children. 1. Ms. Kay Dimmick (3) Kay is Ramsey County Community Corrections Ramsey County Community Corrections Representative on the Bureau's Board of 701 N.W. Eighth Avenue Directors. She has been a member of the Board New Brighton, Mn. 55112 for three years. She is interested in (W) 636-7000 resources for young people and their families. STUDENT REPRESENTATION: * i. Vacanc - Roseville Area Schools * 2. Vacant - Mounds View Area Schools WELFARE REPRESENTATION: 1. Mr. Pat Fusco (7) Ramsey County Human Services 160 East Kellogg Blvd. St. Paul, Mn. 55101 (W)198-4889 Pat represents the Ramsey County Welfare Department on the Board of Directors. He has been on the Board for seven years, ever ,irca it '-pan. Ile is a liaison between 'lelfare and the Youth Service Bureau. CITY MANAGEMENT REPRESENTATION: 1. Mr. James Andre (7) Roseville City Manager ^ Roseville City Hall i 2660 Civic Center Drive Roseville, Mo. 55113 (W) 484-3371 SCHOOL COMMUNITY EDUCATION REPRESENTATION: * 1. Mr. Paul Donley/John Ostlund (4) Mounds View Area Community Education 2959 North Hemline Roseville, Mn. 55113 (H) 894-8985 - Paul (H) 571-7989 - John (W) 636-3650 - Paul (W) 784-9600 - John * 2. Ms. Marilyn Kerns (4) Roseville Area Community Education Fairview Co®unity School Center 1910 West County Road B Roseville, Mo. 55113 (H) 482-1029 (W) 633-8150 Ext. 307 CITIZENS AT LARGE REPRESENTATION: Mrs. Ann Berry (Roseville Area) (5) 1059 Woodhill Drive Roseville, Mo. 55113 (H) 484-4502 2. Mrs. Jackie Hays (Roseville Area)(7) 2459 North Sheldon Street Roseville, Mo. 55113 (H) 633-8572 (W) 642-4067 Jim represents the City Managers on the Board of Directors. lie has been on the Board since it began in 1976. Paul and John represent the Mounds View Community Education Department. They have served on the Board for four years. Marilyn represents Roseville Community School Services. She has been a member of the Board for four years. She is interested in better school/agency cooperation. Ann serves as a Citizen at Large from the Roseville School attendance area. She has served on the Board for five years. Ann has a deep concern that young people in trouble have quality, compassionate, professional auppott available. Jackie represents the Roseville Schools attendance area on the Board of Directors. She has been a member of. the Board of Directors since it was first organized in 1976 (7 years). She is interested in the development of community services for young people and their families. 3. Mr. Don Severson (Mounds View Area)(2) Don represents the Mounds View Area Schools 1158 Carlton Drive attendance area as a Citizen at Large. He has Arden Hills, Mo. 55112 been on the Bureau's Board for two years. (H) 484-5400 Don is very interestad in Lim services the (W) 482-9360 Bureau provides for young people in the community * 4. Mr. Don Zibell (Mounds View Area)(4) Don represents the Mounds View School attendance 3422 Chandler Road area as a Citizen at Large. Don has been a Shoreview, Mo. 55112 Board member for 4 years. (H) 482-1965 (W) 920-9544 ER-OFFICIO MEMBERS: ' * 1. Ms. Carol Seidenkranz (3) Carol is the Mounds View Area Schools Student (Mounds View Area Services Coordinator. She is an ex-offici Irondale Senior high School is member of the Board and has been for 3 yea 2425 Long Lake Road Carol is familiar with the problems of young"" Mounds View, Mn. 55112 people and works as a liaison between the (II) 699-4046 schools and service agencies such as the Bureau. (W) 786-5203 * 2. Mr. Steve Bloom (2) Steve is the Roseville Area Schools Student (Roseville Area Schools) Services Coordinator. He serves as an ex-officio Schools Special Services Office member of the Board of Directors and has been Fairview Community School Center for 2 years. Steve is interested in counseling 1910 West County Road B resources for adolescents and their families Roseville, Mo. 55113 in the 623 district communities. (H) 489-3135 (W) 633-8150 Ext. 326 HONORABLE MEMBER: 1. Ms. Barb Whitmore (6) Barb was elected as an honorary member of the 2124 Fremont Avenue South Bureau's Board of Directors for her efforts in Mple, Mo. 55405 establishing the Youth Service Bureau. Barb (II) 377-2931 organized the community support, developed the (W) 296-1261 initial grant, and spent considerable energies staffing the efforts of the organizational Board. 10 *Member of the Executive Board. )Years as member of the Board. I'D NORTHWEST SUBURBAN YOUTH SERVICE BUREAU STAFF SUMMARY CHRISTOPHER C. CLAUSON - Executive Director fLyis started with the Bureau in July, 1976. He has a Master of Social Work (MSW) Degree I n the University of Michigan (Ann Arbor), and is a member of the Academy of Certified aial Workers (ACSW). Chris has over 15 years experience as a Program Manager and Administrator; has been an instructor and Project Coordinator at the University of Minnesota Center for Youth Development Research; was a Volunteer Program Coordinator, Institutional Caseworker, Probation Officer; currently serves as Field Instructor for the University of Minnesota School of Social Work; and is a member of the Wilder Child Guidance Clinic Advisory Board. FRANCES J. RYAN - Secretary/Officer Manager Fran started with the Bureau in July of 1980. After graduation from Washington High School, she enlisted in the U.S. Navy for three years, serving in the Medical Corps. She has attended various courses offered at Globe Business College, U of M, and extension classes at Alexander Ramsey High School. Fran has over twelve years of office experience, and before joining the Youth Service Bureau, worked as an Administrative Secretary for a large trucking firm. KAY Z. BISCHOFF - Youth/Family Counselor Kay started with the Bureau in September, 1976. She has a Master of Divinity Degree from McCormick Theological Seminary in Chicago, with emphasis on counseling, and a B.A. Degree in Social Work from Macalaster College in St. Paul. She has served in a number of different counseling roles over the past thirteen years including four years as Director and Counselor at the Counseling Center of Southern Minnesota in Lakeville, Minnesota. Kay currently is 'tified by the American Association of Marriage and Family Therapists (AAHFT). ,...nN G. SULLIVAN - Youth/Family Counselor John started with the Bureau in August, 1976. He has a B.A. Degree from the College of St. Thomas in St. Paul, and completed his Master of Social Work (MSW) Degree at the University of Minnesota. John has received additional training in counseling from various resources including the Johnson Institute, Family Therapy Institute, and the Wilder Child Guidance Clinic. He has had eight years of youth and family counseling experience including prior positions at the Bridge for Runaway Youth in Minneapolis, the Urban Coalition of Minneapolis, and two years experience as a Church Youth Worker in the St. Paul Midway area. JEANNE A. THOMPS04 - Youth Employment Program Coordinator Jeanne started with the Bureau in April, 1978, She is a graduate of Alexander Ramsey High School and is currently enrolled in the Liberal Arts Program at Lakewood Community College. Prior to joining our staff, Jeanne worked as an Assistant Head Cashier for the Target Store in Roseville, and as a public relations person for a musical show group. She is the person who is primarily responsible for establishing the Bureau's Youth Employment Program. SAM ALBERT, Ph.D. - Licensed Consulting Psychologist (ASSOCIATE STAFF MEMBER) Sam received his Doctoral Degree in Clinical Psychology in 1978 from the University of Arizona. In addition to serving as a consultant to the NW Suburban Youth Service Bureau, he maintains a part-time therapy practice and is a consultant to the Anoka County Corrections Department, Anoka County Sheriff's Department, Alpha Human Services, Family Renewal Center, Home of the Good Shepherd. Sam has worked in several settings, including juvenile sectional institutions, psychiatric hospitals, a mental health center, and a home for the mentally retarded. His areas of specialty and interest include adolescent behavioral problems, psychological testing, family sexual abuse, anti -social behavior, and sexual aggressiveness. He to currently in private practice In H(nneapolln. ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION OF NORT11WEST SUBURBAN YOUTH SERVICE BUREAU (A Minnesota "on -Profit Corporation) Article I. Name. The name of this corporation is the Northwest Suburban Youth Service Bureau. Article II. Purpose. The purpose of the Northwest suburban Youth Service Bureau is charitable. It will engage in all activities and programs that shall serve the purpose of porventing youths from entering or re-entering, the criminal justice systom as accused persons. Article III. No Pecuniary Gain. The Northwest Suburban Youth Service Bureau does not afford pecuniary gain, incidentally or otherwise, to its members. Article IV. Period of. Duration. The duration of tha Northwest Suburban Youth Service Bureau is perpetual. Article V. Registered Office. The regiutered office of the Northwest Suburban Youth Service Bureau is 2660 Civic Cantor nr.ivo, Roseville, Minnesota 55113. Article VI. Incorporators. Thu namo and addrona of each incorporator is: Paul 0. flardt Jackir. Ilayn Timothy U. Smi.th 1476 20th Avenun N.W. hots Brighton, Ilinnonoto 55112 2457 Worth Sholdon Rouuvillo, Hinnunrrtn 55111 2200 Loin Brivu Fit, Paul, hinnnnota 55112 Article VII. Board of. 1lirectura, om foliming pnrnonn constitute tho Board or uiroct.orn, whnua orivinal torso of office 1111011 be for one years WilliamFayurninon 1401 Indian Oaks Trail fit. Paul, hinnoeota 11,v11 0. Ilardt 1476 20th Avenue N.W. New Brighton, Minnesota Nary Newbold 585 Harriet Avenue Shorevie:a, Minnesota Joint Pickar 2299 Knoll Drive New Brighton, Minnesota Rogor Runyon 3046 Labore Road Little Canaria, ?tinnesota Willis Warkentien 1794 North Albert Falcon Heights, Minnesota Robert Nisen 1765 Carl Lauderdale, Minnesota Gary Anderson 2701 North Lexington Avenue Roseville, Minnesota Gary LaVasseur 803 5th Avenue N.11. New Brighton, Minnesota Tim Smith 2401. N.L. highway 10 New Brighton, Minnesota Fred Spencer 3401 Rice Street St. Paul, Minnesota I Mel Fish 1450 West Highway 96 Arden hills, Minnesota Ruth Hagen 1530 Larnenteur St. Paul, Minnesota Pat Fusco 160 East Kellogg St. Paul, Minnesota Ld Larsen 2029 Palace Avenue St. Paul, "tinnesot-a Patti Allen 321 Last Larpenteur Roseville, Minnesota .7i.e1 And= 2701 F4utLti Lunn}.`"' ".^^"^" Roseville, Minnesota Jacl.in hays 2459 North Sheldon Roseville, Minnesota Roland Wilsey 1947 '.lest County Road C "+t. Paul, Minnesota Richarn Wedell 1003 Richmond Court St. Paul, Minnesota William Falvey 3445 Nancy Place St. Paul, Minnesota Article VIII. Personal Liability. Members of tho florthwost Is 11 t� Suburban Youth Service Bureau shall not have any pornonal liability for corporate obligations. Articlo I\. Capital Stock. There shall be no capital Block. Subscribed and sworn to before Pie this day of _^ 1976. Notary Public Subscribed and sworl: to before me this day of _,__ 1976. Notary Pulilic I Subscribed and sworn to before me this _— day of iotary'hubfic /nz P_1111 0. Ilardt .� Paul 0. Ilardt /s Jackie !lays ,o Bays s/ Timothy-D. Smith Timot ty 0. Smlt 1 r.?rf:iv i:l':1 ": 5'l�iilin IIIE�.i!lIT°:il el.:S iif"_d for rem, n this 0:1 ad eras duty uco:d:.. in f•'a^i• V Stcro;ary of SlMe 9 BY -LAMS OF THE NORTHWEST SUBURBAN YOUTH SERVICE BUREAU Article I: Name The name of the organization shall be Northwest Suburban Youth Service Bureau. Article 1I: Purpose The purpose of the Northwest Suburban Youth Service Bureau is to engage in as many activities and programs as possible that would serve the purpose of preventing youths from entering or re-entering the criminal justice system. The means for fulfilling this purpose include: 1) identifying the needs of troubled juveniles and their families through short-term counseling with professionals, and directing them to available resources either within the Northwest Suburban Youth Service Bureau or elsewhere; 2) researching the needs of young people in the community for the purpose of helping existing schools, churches, social service agencies, and law enforcement agencies fill in the gaps in the services rendered to juveniles; 3) providing and promoting recreational and social activities for youths. Article III: Offices The principal office of the Northwest Suburban Youth Service Bureau shall be located at the Roseville City Hall, Roseville, Minnesota. This location may be changed as the Board of Directors may determine. Article IV: Boards Section 1: Board Organization There shall be in the organization two (2) Boards: 1) a Board of Directors, and 2) an Executive Board. Section 2: General Powers The Board of Directors shall constitute the governing and policy -making body of the Northwest Suburban Youth Service Bureau. It shall be responsible for all aspects of the operation of the Northwest Suburban Youth Service Bureau. The Executive Roard shall have the power to make decisions for business purpose and such matters as permitted by the Board of Directors. Section 3: Number, Tenure, and Qualifications The composition of the Board of Directors shall be twenty-five (25), and shall consist of the following: one person designated by each of the municipalities served by the Northwest Suburban Youth Service Bureau; one representative from each of the following law enforcement organizations: Ramsey County Sheriff's Office, Roseville Police Department, New Brighton Police Depart- ment, and the hounds View Police Department; one representative from the area probation office of the Ramsey County Department of Community Corrections; one representative from the Ramsey County Welfare Department; one representative from the Mounds View School District; one representative from the Roseville School District; one student from the Wounds View School District; one student from the Roseville School District; two citizens at large from the Mounds View School District; two citizens at large from the Roseville School District; one representative from the city managers and/or clerk: administrators of the municipalities served by the Northwest Suburban Youth Service Bureau; one representative from Mounds View Community Education; one rep- resentative from Roseville Community Education. In the establishment of the first governing board, one-half of the members shall have two-year terms and one-half shall have one-year terms. This will be established at the first board meeting. After the first year, however, all terms of office shall be for two years duration with the right to succession on the Board, unlimited. The Executive Board shall consist of the officers of the Board of Directors -- Chairperson, Vice -Chairperson, and Secretary - Treasurer, along with one law enforcement representative, one citizen representative, one school district representative, one city council representative, one Mounds View Community Education representative, and one Roseville Community Education representative. Any member of the Board of Directors, Executive Board, Committee"- or the Director o° the Bureau may be removed by a 2/3 majority. votes of the Board of Directors. Section 4: Regular Meetings The Board of Directors of the Northwest Suburban Youth Service Bureau shall have regular meetings to be held quarterly. The Executive Board will meet monthly or as required. Section 5: Special Meetings The Chairperson of the Board may call Special Meetings, or Special Meetings can be called by one-third of the Board Members in concurrence. Section 6: Notice Notice of the Regular Meetings shall be given by mail by the Chairperson of the Board at least one week prior to the Regular Meetings, and shall include a statement of the agenda. Notice of a Special Meeting shall be given at least 24 hours prior to the time of the meeting. Section 1: Quorum A quorum shall be constituted by thirteen (13) members of the Board of Directors. Section B: Manner of Acting During a Regular Meeting, convened by the Chairperson of the Board, the Board shall act on all items on the agenda. Items u not included on the agenda may be acted upon with the consensus of the Board. All members of the Board shall be expected to vote except where there might exist a conflict of interest, in which case the interested Board Member cannot vote. A tic vote is considered a defeat of a particular proposal. Except where otherwise stipulated, Roberts' Rule�o� Order, Revised, shall be the authority on parliamentary p Section 9: Vacancies New vacancies for members representing municipalities or organi- zations on the Board of Directors shall be filled by the munici- pality or organization. New vacancies for citizens at large shall be filled by a majority vote tof the ry alternate Board. Members of the Board shall be allowed to appoint members who shall be designated in advance. Section 10: Compensation The members of the Board of Directors shall serve without n connection with be reimbursthe ed for expenses incurred i Article V: Officers Section 1: Officers The Officers of the Board of Directors shall include a Chairperson, a Vice -Chairperson, and Secretary -Treasurer. Section 2: Election and Term of Office Election shall be held the first full meeting after the first of each hcalendar of year, and officers shall be elected for a term of one y Section 3: The Chairperson of the Board The Chairperson of the Board shall convene and preside at all Regular Meetings. He or she shall call Special Meetings, and shall appoint all committees of the Board. The Advisory Committee shall be a standing committee. It shall not be limited as to nuutlermembers. shall whose special qualifications are be professional lay PeOP suitable to the purpose of the Bureau. Section 4: The Vice -Chairperson of the Board The Vice -Chairperson of the Board shall preside at all meetings at which the Chairperson of the Board is absent. Section 5: The Secretary -Treasurer The Secretary -Treasurer shall record and sign the minutes for the meetings -T the Board and shall act as advisor to the Director of the Bureau in financial matters. n Article VI: Committees Section 1: Committees V Committees may be caused to exist by the Board in its usual manner of voting or at the determination of the Chairperson of the Board. These committees may include membership from outside the Board of Directors. Section 2: Selection of Committee Members Committee members are appointed by the Chairperson of the Board. Section 3: Chairperson of a Committee The Chairperson of a committee shall be selected by the Chairperson of the Board. Article V11: Director of Center, Staff Section 1: Director of the Bureau The Director of the Bureau shall be selected by the majority of the Board of Directors and serve at the pleasure of the Board of Directors. Section 2: Director The Director of the Northwest Suburban Youth Service Bureau has the responsibility of: a) coordinating the entire program of the Bureau, of developing resources, and of implementing programs, b) hiring and firing staff when needed and where funds allow; and c) being responsible and accountable to the Board of Directors. Section 3: Staff The staff is responsible for implementing the program of the Northwest Suburban Youth Service Bureau under supervision of the Director. Article VIII: Business Items, Checks, and Funds Section 1: Business Items The Director of the Northwest Suburban Youth Service Bureau shall have the right to approve any budgeted items without prior approval of the Board. Section 2: Checks, Drafts, etc. The Director of the Bureau and either the Secretary -Treasurer or Chairperson shall sign all checks. Section 3: Gifts Gifts and contributions to the Bureau can be accepted by the Director of the Bureau or the Board of Directors. Article IX: Books and Records All financial books and records shall be kept by the Director of the Bureau in consultation with the Secretary -Treasurer. Financial records shall be made available on request by the Chairperson of the Board. All other records shall be maintained by the staff, under the supervision of the Director or someone chosen by him or her. The Northwest Suburban Youth Service Bureau shall recognize and preserve the confidentiality of personal records. Article X: Calendar Year The fiscal year shall be tv;elve consecutive months, July 1 through June 30. Article XI: Amendments to By -Laws Proposed amendments to the By -Laws must be made in writing to the Director and members of the Board one week prior to the Regular Board Meeting at which time the proposed amendment may be acted upon. A two-thirds (2/3) majority of the Board members present and voting shall be required to pass an amendment to the By -Laws. 41 5 M 41 JOIIIT M ERS AGREUVIT THIS A'RFENENP is made by and between the Cities of. Arden Hills, New Brighton, Moundsview, Shoreview, North Oaks, Roseville, Little Canada, Lauderdale and Falcon Heights, all located in the County of Ramsey, State of Minnesota. WHEREAS, the Northwest Suburban Youth Service Bureau is a non-profit corporation providing counseling and guidance programs to youths residing in the northwest suburbs of the City of Saint Paul, including the municipalities which are signatories to this Agreement; and WHEREAS, the municipalities which are parties to this Agreement intend to act as the sponsors of the Northwest Suburban Youth Service 'ureau by providing monetary support for its activities, which activities are considered to be in the best interests of the citizens of the signator% municipalities; and WHEREAS, the City Councils of the municipalities signatory to this Agreement have made resolutions supporting the programs of the Northwest Suburban Youth Service Bureau and have agreed to share in the financial responsibilities for matching funds provided by State, Federal and County grants; and W:IERFAS, it is the intent of the municipalities which are signatories to this Tgreement to provide a formula for apportion- ment of the financing of the Northwest Suburban Youth Service bureau and to formalize the relationship between the Northwest - Suburban Youth Service 1,ureau and the municipalities signatory to thin Agreement. pow, THEREFORL, I'r IS AGREED by and between the parties hereto, as follows: 1. The City of Roseville., r•linnesota, is designated by the signatories to this Agreement as the sponsoring community; as such, the City of Roseville shall contract with the Northwest Suburban Youth Service Bureau for services to be rendered by the Northwest Suburban Youth Service Bureau to the municipalities signatory to this Agreement. 2. The city of Roseville, as the sponsoring community, shall provide administrative services to the Northwest Suburban Youth Service Bureau, as follows: A. Accounting and Auditing Services B. Printing and copying Services C. Acquisition of Supplies The city of Roseville shall be reimbursed for the above services from the operating budget of the Northwest Suburban Youth Service Bureau on the basis of the City,s costs in supplying such services. 3. Funds for operating the Northwest Suburban Youth Service Bureau will be secured from grants or appropriations from State, Federal and County agencies and in the event such grants require matching funds, the parties to this Agreement shall provide such ma{.thing funds, based upon the following formula: I - 2 - Each municipality shall pay an amount equal in percentage to the particular municipality's per capita population as compared to the per capita population of all of the muni- cipalities signatory to this Agreement. The populations of the municipalities shall be determined by using Metro- politan Council Population Data available at the first of each calendar year. Said total amount payable by the signatory municipalities shall not exceed 150,5 of the 1978 budget• approved by the Financial Board. If this Agreement is extended pursuant to Paragraph 6, below, said total amount payable by the signatory municipalities shall not exceed the percentage of the entire budget set by the Financial Board, established pursuant to Paragraph 5, below. 4. Amounts payable by the ;municipalities signatory to this Agreement pursuant to Paragraph 3, above, shall be paid to the City of Roseville which will, in turn, as consideration for the contract for services with the Northwest Suburban Youth Service Bureau referred to in Paragraph 1, above, pay said amount to the Northwest Suburban Youth Service Bureau. l5. This Agreement is contingent upon the Northwest Suburban Youth Service Bureau having one representative appointed by each of the City Councils of the municipalities signatory to this Agreement, to its Board of Directors, this Agreement further is contingent upon the Northwest Suburban Youth Service Bureau establishing a separate Financial Board composed exclu- sively of the members of the Board of Directors appointed by the municipalities signatory to this Agreement, which Financial Board shall have the right to finally approve or disapprove the budget of the Northwest Suburban Youth Service Bureau, referred to in Paragraph 3, above, 6. This Agreement shall not become effective until such Ctime as it is signed by municipalities with a total per capita - 3 - Population of in excess of 80,000, using the population data provided by the 9etropolitan Council. 7. This Agreement shall expire on the "1st day of December, 1978, unless otherwise extended by the signatories to this Agreement. Extensions of this Agreement shall be by resolution of the governing bodies of the municipalities signatory to this Agreement made on or before June 30 of the year preceding the year the extension is to take effect. Said extensions shall not become effective until resolutions are adopted by municipalities with a total per capita population of in excess of 80,000 using the population data provided by the Metropolitan Council. IN WITNESS WitEREOF, the authorized representatives of the various municipalities have executed this Agreement on the dates set forth below. CITY OF ARDEN HILLS Dated: 1977. P,y: Its: Mayor By:_ Its : t•lanager ! CITY O� NEW BRIG3TON Dated: 1977. n 7 Its :17 Mayor By: I Its: Manager Dated; �_ 1977 CITY OF MOUNDSVIEW ;. Its: Mayor Its: 1 manager 0 11 - 4 - }0 aA u Dated: 1977. Dated: Or.Wc, /3 1977 Dated: 1977. Dated: A � .:: 1 - 1977. /, Dated: _01tl t)—A 1977. Dated: ✓%�/ , 1977. CITY OF BY: --, dCvni Its: .,!.Iayor i, By: { Its: / tanager CITY QF NORTH S /�/ Its: Mayor / By:_. Its: f• nage3f ' CITY OF' ROSRVILT,: ,J Its: Mayor By: A. Its: (Manager CITY OF/,LITTLE CANADA ., / By: '..i.i% Its: Manager CITY OF LAUDERDALr•. .ItS: Mayor �ts: Manager CITY ,OF FALCON HG3NITS Its:.. Mayor 'Its: Manager - 5 - NORTHWEST SUBURBAN YOUTH SERVICE BUREAU 1983 PROGRAM BUDGET EXPENSES MOYMENT COUNSELING TOTAL PEPS ONNEL Salaries - Regular $19,910.00 $ 85,360.00 $105,270.00 Salaries - Temporary -0- 6,230.00 6,230.DO Employees - Pension 1,907.00 8,128.00 10,035.00 Employees - Insurance 2,542.00 10,838.00 13,380.00 Sub -Total Personnel $24,359.00 $110,556.00 $134,915.00 NON -PERSONNEL Office Supplies $ 285.00 $ 1,215.00 $ 1,500.00 Communications 809.00 3,451.00 4,260.00 Transportation 312.00 1,328.00 1,640.00 Printing/Xerox 195.00 830.00 1,025.00 Insurance 475.00 2,025.00 2,500.00 Rental 1,928.00 8,218.00 10,146.00 Training 285.00 1,215.00 1,500.00 Restitution -0- -0- -0- Professional Services 760.00 3,240.00 4,000.00 Miscellaneous -0- -0- -0- Sub-Total Non -Personnel , $ 5,049.00 $ 21,522.00 $ 26,571.00 TOTALS - EXPENSES $ 29,408.00 $132,078.00 $161,486.00 * rt * * * e • * a * * e e e ,� a E EMPLOYFMT COUNSELING/ TOTAL INTERVENTION Cities of: Roseville $ 7,929.00 $ 19,920.00 $ 27,849.00 New Brighton 5,189.00 13,028.00 18,217.00 Shoreview 3,854.00 9,684.00 13,538.00 Mounds View 2,812.00 7,066.00 9,878.00 Little Canada 1,580.00 3,969.00 .5,549.00 Falcon Heights 1,181.00 2,968.00 4,149.00 Lauderdale 442.00 1,112.00 1,554.00 hlo•" Sub -Total - Cities $23,303.00 $ 38,544.00 $ 81,847.00 Ramsey County $ 36,193.00 $ 36,193.00 District 621 $ 1,139.D0 2,861.00 4,uu:1.00 District 623 1,139.00 2,861.DO 4,000.00 Fees -0 12,000.00 12,000.00 State Grant -0 10,000.00 10,000.00 Donations 3,827.00 9,619.00 13,446.00 Sub -Total - Other 6,105.00 73 534.D0 79 639.DO TOTALS - REVENUES 529,408.00 $132,078.00 JIL1. 486.00 I4EMO TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Clerk -Administrator; , DATE: October 28, 1982 \ SUBJECT: LIQUID PROPANE VEHICLE CONVERSION AND FUEL SUPPLY REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Attached please find the proposed Request for Proposal for the conversion of five City vehicles to liquid propane fueling and the supplying of a fuel pumping system and fuel to the City of Mounds View. These specifications have been prepared on the basis of the proposal submitted by staff to the Council which was approved during the budgeting process, as well as being reviewed by the City's mechanic for any inconsistencies he felt might exist. Staff would request that Council review this Request for Proposal and should it be found to be acceptable, set a opening date for the proposals of November 29, 1982. Should you have any questions or require any additional informa- tion on this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me. DFP/pf Attachments �J CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL LIQUID PROPANE VEHICLE CONVERSION AND FUEL SUPPLY It is the intent of this Request For Proposal (RFP) to select a contractor to convert a 1979 Ford L-800 with mounted Jet Rodder from gasoline to full propane single fueling and supply the equipment for the conversion of four other municipal vehicles. This RFP will also select a contractor to furnish propane and the necessary equipment to supply this fuel to the converted vehicles. Right is reserved, if considered in the best interest of the City, to award these contracts jointly or separately. The City further reserves the right to reject any and all bids. Bidders shall have been engaged in the business to make such fuel system conversions, supplying equipment, and providing training and support for a minimum of 12 months with properly qualified personnel who are registered with the National LP -Gas Association or have been in the propane distributing business for a like period with their place of business being within a 30 mile radius of the Mounds View Public Works facility at 2466 Bronson Drive. All bidders shall be able to show evidence of their reliability, ability, experience, equipment, facilities, and personnel directly employed by them to render prompt and satisfactory service. All bidders will be responsible for inspecting the site and all vehicles to ensure that the equipment bid will be suitable for the purposes intended and that the vehicles are capable of being converted. All bids are to remain open for 30 days after the opening of 1982 proposals at 9:00 a.m. on , November Award will be made separately on each part. PART I SPECIFICATIONS - Conversion of Vehicles to Propane Fuel System It is the intent of this specification to provide for the conversion of five City owned vehicles to a full propane single fuel system. The first conversion will be done at the place of business of the contractor which must be within a 30 mile radius of the Mounds View Public Works Garage. It is the intent of the City of Mounds View to provide and mechanic to work at the vendor's garage for the first conversion. The remaining four units will have the equipment installation performed at the Public Works Garage and then returned to the vendor for final adjustments such as timing adjustments and pressure testing for leaks, etc. CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Page Two The City of Mounds View will convert five vehicles listed as • follows to straight propane: 1. 1979 Ford L-800, 475 c.i. V-8, 4 barrel carburetor with mounted Jet Rodder powered by a 300 c.i. Ford Industrial engine 2. 1982 Chevrolet Impala 5 liter engine with C-3 computer 3. 1981 Ford Fairmont 260 c.i. V-8 Engine 4. 1980 Chevrolet pick-up, 305 V-8 Engine 5. 1980 Chevrolet pick-up, 305 V-8 Engine The successful contractor will be required to meet the following specifications: 1. Furnish six conversion kits, Impco or equivalent. (Bidder to specify manufacturer and model number.) 2. Furnish propane tanks as follows: a. Vehicle #1 - e 20 x 36 step tank with 44 gal. capacity 20 x 42 step tank with 51 gal. capacity b. Vehicles #2 and #3 - 12 x 10 x 36 underbody tank with 27.5 gal. capacity C. Vehicles #4 and #5 - 14 x 56 underbody Link with 35 gal. capacity 3. Dash mounted fuel gauges. 4. Furnish two sets of parts books and repair manuals for each different piece of equipment used in the conversion plus mechanic and vehicle users training sessions. Any deviations from the above specifications must be clearly indicated by the bidder with explanation, otherwise it will be considered that the proposal is in strict compliance. It should be noted that when BRAND NAMES, or manufacturers numbers are stated in the specifications, they are intended to establish a standard only and are not restrictive unless the bid states "NO SUBSTITUTE". Bids will be considered on all makes, models, or brands having comparable quality, style and workmanship that have demonstrated an equal performance acceptable to the City of Mounds View. Alternative bids offering lower quality will not be considered. CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Page Three The successful contractor is to provide instruction to the City mechanic in the installation of conversion kits and maintenance in order to obtain optimum engine performance and to vehicle users in vehicle operation at no cost to the City. All safety rules as apply to the handling and use of Liquid Propane shall be thoroughly stressed in the training program. The successful contractor shall warranty all parts for a minimum of 90 days, including labor to replace such parts if required by the City and at no expense to the City. All other warranties as offered the general public shall also apply. It will be the responsibility of the contractor to determine that the engines in the units to be converted are compatible to propane fuel and that such usage will not cause damage to or reduce the life of the engines. All equipment used in the conversion shall be new and current production models incorporating the latest technical advances in the art. Equipment shall be Underwriters Laboratory and/or A.S.M.E. Approved with spare parts stocked by the facility making the conversions or available from other stock within 24 hours of request for such parts. The successful contractor must supply a performance bond in the amount of $5,000.00 which will be in effect for a 12 month period from the award of the contract. Contractor will not use the contract in any advertising or promotion of the contractor's business without express approval of the City. Right is reserved to evaluate equipment proposed to be used in the conversion and to make award based on that evaluation to other than the low bidder if such award would be considered to be in the best interest of the City. PART II SPECIFICATIONS - Furnish Propane and Associated Pumping Equipment Furnish and install a liquid propane gas system with a minimum capacity of 1,000 gallons complete with pump, scale dispensing system. fuel meter in gallons registering total fuel dispensed and a trip type meter measuring gallons installed in each individual vehicle. The City of Mounds View will furnish proper electrical power to the station as required. Contractor shall provide all maintenance, 14nc11.1dinq parts and labor on the installation during the period of the coaiLract:. Ecuipment'shall meet or exceed all requirements of the National Fire ProtecLicn Association. Location for the installation will be the City of Mounds View Public {corks Garage at 2466 Bronson Drive, Mounds View, Minnesota. The City will prepare the site, provide necessary fencing and underground electrical service. The City will also provide all necessary permits and authorization for such installation. CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Page Four The contractor will instruct City employees on the use of the installation. All safety rules as apply to the handling and use of Liquid Propane shall be thoroughly stressed in the training program. The initial contract will be for a 12 month period. Right is reserved to extend the contract for additional periods subject to acceptance of contractor at the time of extension. Propane price to be firm subject to any increase or decrease in supplier's wholesale cost as verified to the City upon request. Propane supplied must be satisfactory for use as a motor fuel. Bids are not to include any Federal or State taxes as the City is exempt from Federal tax on this product and will pay the State tax directly to the State of Minnesota. It is estimated that this location will require approximately 12,000 gallons of propane over the 12 month contract period. Contractor shall be available for emergency service and supply 24 hours per day. In the event that the contractor cannot furnish propane as required, right is reserved to cancel contract on 30 day's notice to contractor. The successful contractor must supply a performance bond in an amount equal to 12,000 gallons at the bid price which will be in effect for a 12 month period from the award of the contract. Completed RFP forms should be mailed to: Donald F. Pauley Clerk -Administrator City of Mounds View 2401 Highway 10 St. Paul, MN 55112 J CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW 2401 HIGHWAY 10 MOUNDS VIEW, MINNESOTA 55112 RFP FORM Liquid Propane Vehicle Conversion and Fuel Supply FIRM NAME: ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: FIRM REPRESENTATIVE: I. VEHICLE CONVERSION VEHICLE # 1 Truck Engine Conversion Kit (specify manufacturer or name brand & model number and all parts included in kit) $ L.P. Gas Step Tank (specify manufacturer or name brand, model number & size) Jet Rodder Engine Conversion Kit (specify manufacturer or name brand & model number and all parts included in kit) L.P. Gas Step Tank (specify manufacturer or name brand model number & size) Labor for Conversion of Vehicle Total Vehicle Cost $ VEHICLE # 2 Conversion Kit (specify manufacturer or name brand & model number and all parts included in kit) $ L.P. Gas Underbody Tank (specify manufacturer or name brand, model number & size) Remote Fill (specify manufacturer or name brand & model number) Labor for final adjustmenLs Total Vehicle Cost $ VEHICLE # 3 Conversion Kit (Specify manufacturer or name brand & modal number and all parts included in kit) $ L.P. Gas Underbody (specify manufacturer or name brand, model number & size) Remote Fill (specify manufacturer or name brand & model.,number) Labor for final adjustments Total Vehicle Cost $ VEHICLE # 4 Conversion Kit (specify manufacturer or name brand & model number and all parts included in kit) $ L.P. Gas Underbody Tank (specify manufacturer or name brand, model number & size) Labor for final adjustments Total Vehicle Cost $ VEHICLE # 5 Conversion Kit (specify manufacturer or name brand & model number and all parts included in kit) $ L.P. Gas Underbody Tank (specify manufacturer or name brand, model number & size) Labor for final adjustments Total Vehille Cost $ TOTAL CONVERSION COST FOR ALL VEHICLES $ II. Fuel Supply Annual Lease price for dispensing equipment (Specify Tank Size and Equipment Features) $ Propane price per gallon $ SIGNATURE: DATE: 1r, f Jim Robison Texgas Corporation 1430 Old Highway 8 New Brighton, MN 55112 Burling Sales Associates, Inc 14325 28th Place No. Minneapolis, MN 55441 Auto Energy, Inc. 6968 Shady Oak Road Eden Prairie, MN 55344 North Central Public Service 1930 Coon Rapids Blvd. Coon Rapids, MN 55433 Northern Propane Gas Co. 11300 Central Ave. N.E. Minneapolis, MN 55434 Twin City Shelgas Service ,,655 West Main noka, MN 55303 Mailing List Propane RFP DATE APPROVED: 10/25/82 PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA Regular Meeting October 11, 1982 Mounds View City Hall -2401-Hwy. 10, Mounds View, MN 55112 ------------------------------------ ------------------------------ The Mounds View City Council was called to order by 1. Call to Order Mayor McCarty at 7:37 PM. MEMBERS PRESENT: Councilmembers Forslund, Blanchard, 2. Roll Call Doty, o ges and Mayor McCarty. ALSO PRESENT: City Attorney Meyers, Clerk/Admini- strator Pauley and Public Works/Community Development Director Johnson. Mayor McCarty clarified his position, and the feel- 3. Approval of ings of the Council, regarding the delinquent tax Minutes: bills as discussed at the September 27 meeting, and September 27, misrepresented in the New Brighton Bulletin. He 1982 and Octobe ,--emphasized that the Council was not angry with Staff. 4. 1982 i Action/Second: McCarty/Hodges to express a complete an Iota vote of confidence in favor of the Staff members. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried It was also noted that while the bids came in higher than projected for the Oak Park project, the cost is to be paid by the developer, and not the City. Motion/Second: Doty/Hodges to approve the September 7 minutes as corrected. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Motion/Second: McCarty/Forslund to approve the bcto er 82 minutes as presented. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Motion/Second: McCarty/Doty to recind the motion ma e—de McCarty, seconded by Doty, on October 4, 1982, directing Staff to send a second letter in reference to unpaid utility bills. 'ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Motion/Second: Forslund/Doty to take Resolution No. 5� 02 from the table. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Mounds View City Council October 11, 1982 Regular Meeting Page Two ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Motion/Second: Forslund/Doty to deny Resolution �— 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Mayor McCarty closed the regular meeting and opened the public hearing at 7:40 PM. James Celt, 7751 Greenwood Drive, stated he owns a 4. Public Hearing: lot south of County Road I, which he has been trying Ordinance No. 31 to develop for the past five years, and he feels the Creating Muni - proposed ordinance will make the land undevelopable. cipal Code Chap - He stated he has had many meetings in the past, and ter 48, "Wetland an engineering study has shown it to be buildable, Zoning Ordinance and in meetings with representatives from FEMA, the flood plain organization, they have stated it was buildable. He added, however, if the ordinance is approved, he cannot build on the property. Mr. Celt asked what the implications of the ordinance would be for him, and asked whether the City would purchase his land in the flood plain. He also pointed out that his lot has value, and it falls within 100' of the flood plain, and asked if he would be allowed to build. City Attorney Meyers replied that the ordinance will authorize the acquisition of property, if needed to preserve wetlands, but the City would not be purchasing the property by adopting the ordinance. He. stated Mr. Celt would have to apply to have his lot considered for development after the ordinance becomes effective and should make application for a building permit. He also advised Mr. Celt to point out to the Council how the ordinance hrpacts his property. Mr. Celt stated he is not interested in building on the lot but would like to sell it. Paul Videen, of Midland-Videen, Inc. 2887 No. Wheeler, Roseville, presented a letter to the Council, and read the letter, stating he is in favor of the ordinance but has two problem areas, those being 48.05 Subd. 2, and Subd. 5-C. Mr. Videen explained he has people who have the ability and are interested in building a commercial building on his property. Perry Langer, 1743 Florence St., White Bear Lake, and Bill Langer, 1005 South Circle, Fridley, stated they agreed with Mr. Videen's statements, and asked when the ordinance would take effect. Mayor McCarty replied the ordinance, if adopted this Mounds View City Council October 11, 1982 Regular Meeting Page. Three --------------------------------------------------------------- ,-.qvening, ;could take approximately 45 days to go into ffect. Bruce Malkerson, of Popham, Haik, Schnobrich, Kaufman & Doty, Ltd., 4344 IDS Center, Minneapolis, stated he is representing Messrs. John and Jim Miller, Fred 0. Watson Co., and Keith Harstad, all of whom own property within the City. He presented the Council with a lengthy letter regarding the proposed ordinance, and explained he has several unanswered questions, and reviewed many of them. Mr. Malkerson stated he has reviewed the proposed flood plain ordinance, and feels it is important for the City to do the flood plain and wetlands ordinance together. He stated his clients have objections to the ordinance in its present form, and have several unanswered questions, and that without the information they are requesting to answer these questions, they cannot judge the total impact of the ordinance on them. Mr. Malkerson asked that the Council appoint some- one, whether it be a Staff person, Councilmember, or whoever, to sit down with him and his clients and go over their many areas of question, and aplain how this ordinance would work. He added ,:hat his clients do not want to come in and apply after the ordinance is adopted, and then discover problems. Mr. Malkerson stated he feels the proposed ordinance is a concientious taking, and a violation of rights, and he is putting the City on notice, as he believes the City will be liable for damages if the ordinance is adopted as is. He also asked to be informed of the procedure to be followed for the flood plain ordinance. Mr. Malkerson also suggested several items he feels should be included in the ordinance, as listed on page four of his letter to the Council. He explained that millions of dollars of tax base would be taken off the tax rolls if the ordinance is adopted as is. He also read a Court statement, from 283 N.W.2d 538 at 544, regarding the Court's feelings on taking of property and awarding damages. Mr. Malkerson summarized his stand on the ordinance and asked again for someone to be appointed to work with him and his clients, as only then would they have a better understanding of what the City is trying to tcomplish. Fred Watson, of the Fred Watson Co., 252 S. Plaza Building, Minneapolis, stated he has been waiting for the past two years for something to come to a Mounds View City Council October 11, 1982 Regular Meeting Page Pour ------------------------------------------------------------------------- head. Ile questioned how the elevation was deter- mined, and stated the wetlands seem to have been determined very arbitrarily and asked who the engineer was. Attorney Meyers replied that the City has been involved with water anxd wetlands control for a number of years and that it has been working on a wetland ordinance for quite some time, with both City Staff and other profes- sionals working on it. He explained that one of the first priorities was to take an inventory of the wetlands in the City, which was done with county assistance. Ile stated that the City had professional, technical help in determining what wetlands were within the City limits and what restrictions should apply. He added the definition of wetlands has been developed through the use of technical data. Mr. Watson asked if there were areas that were definitely shown in the flood plain but left out of the wetlands area, and asked specifically who the engineering people were. Attorney Meyers replied the City has retained various professionals over the years to aid in the development of the inventory and drafting of the proposed amendment. He added this ordinance will regulate the use of wetlands in the City. Mayor McCarty added that the wetlands inventory was done mainly by the Ramsey Soil and Water Conservation District. Tom Peterson identified himself as a conservation specialist with the Ramsey Soil and Water Conservation District, and explained the process that was used. He stated the maps were done in the summer of 1980, with air photos taken, and aquatic specialists hired to identify the wetland areas, and the area was then field checked, and the water resources map provided to the City. John Miller stated he has a specific objection to identifying parcel 22 in the northwest corner of his property, Wetland #1-22, as a wetland, as it is designated as 1.1 acres of wetlands, and he feels it is not. He also stated he has a general objection to the ordinance. Jim Cepress, of Dynamic Designers, 2233 West County Road B, Roseville, stated his property has been put in the wetland area, and that he has been in the process for the past two years of trying to develop this property. He stated he was given permis-inn to bring in fill, which 1 Mounds View City Council Regular Meeting October 11, 1982 Page,Five ----------------------------------- brought• it well above the specified level, and ^luld like to speak to someone about this, as he -es not feel it should be classified a wetland. de was directed to speak to Director of Public Works/ Community Development Johnson. Keith Harstad stated his objections have been noted through Mr. Malkerson, and that he personally vehemently objects to the ordinance. He stated he owns three parcels which are substantially affected by this ordinance. Mr. Harstad asked that the ordinance be tabled to allow time for them to discuss it further and have their questions answered. Joseph Goebel, 8121 Long Lake Road, identified him- self as a professional soil scientist and geologist, and stated he was very pleased to see the City has finally come forward with a very responsible ordi- nance on the wetlands. He added the issue came out of the City's total water problem, and he feels that wetlands can contribute to the overall quality of life in the City of Mounds View. After asking for any additional comments and receiving none, Mayor McCarty closed the public hearing and reopened the regular meeting at 8:22 PM. (here were no residents requests or comments from 5. Residents Re - the floor. quests and Comments from the Floor Motion/Second: Blanchard/Hodges to approve the 6. Approval of consent agen a as presented, and waive the reading Consent Agenda of the resolutions. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Motion/Second: Forslund/Doty to approve the second 7. Approval of rea ng o rdinance No. 318 amending the municipal Second Reading code of the City of Mounds View by creating Chapter of Ord. No. 318 48, "Wetland Zoning Ordinance". Amending the Councilmember Forslund - aye Municipal Codeof the City of Councilmember Blanchard - aye Mounds vie- by !^"^•c'1r^mb^ Dcty - aye Creating Chapte Councilmember Hodges - aye 48, "Wetland Mayor McCarty - aye Zoning Ordinanc Motion Carried J Mayor McCarty read the suggested language amendments to the ordinance. Mounds View City Council October 11, 1982 Regular Meeting Page Six ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Motion/Second: Doty/Blanchard to amend Chapter 48.07 Zc as proposed. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion/Second: Forslund/Hodges to approve the amendment of the language to Chapter 48.08, Subdi- visions 1 and 2. 5 ayes 0 nays Attorney Meyers gave an explanation of the changes in language and how they applied to the ordinance. Director of Public Works/Community Development Johnson presented two items that should be considered with the ordinance, Resolution No. 1309 which requires drain tile, and Chapter 48.06, Subd. 4, A, 3, which does not include building permits, but clarifies it as subdivisions and condi- tional use permits. He added he did not feel these two items would conflict with the ordinance. Motion/Second: Doty/Forslund to adopt Ordinance No. 3T a$ amen ed, amending the municipal code of the City of Mounds View by creating Chapter 48, "Wetland Zoning Ordinance". Councilmember Forslund - aye Councilmember Blanchard - aye Councilmember Doty - aye Councilmember Hodges - aye Mayor McCarty - aye Mr. Malkerson pointed out that some major amendments were adopted that were not part of the prior pub- lications. He stated lie has not had an opportunity to determine how these will work. He stated lie had asked earlier, and is asking again, for an opportunity to discuss the ordinance and have ouestions answered. He added it is a matter of procedural due process to delay it for at least two weeks to allow time to have these questions answered. Attorney Meyers responded in his opinion the ordinance and amendments were legal. He added that he has seen few major pieces of legislation that have received the approval of everyone, and that quite a bit of time and deliberation have gone into fulfilling everything that is required. He added that they followed Chapter 462 of the State Statutes, and that due process has been given. lie also stated that all suggestions received by the City have been given consideration. Mayor McCarty stated he would like to recognize all the many people who have been very important in this process, such as Dr. Joseph Goebel, Robert Glazer, the Planning Commissioners - Gene Anderson, Sharon Motion Carried Motion Carried 1 Motion Carried 0 Mounds View City Council Regular Meeting ---------------------------------------------------- cCarthy, Josey Warren, Jean Miller, Ken Breske, erry Linke and Chairman Peg Mountin, as well as all .he people who worked long hours and attended many meetings, Mayor McCarty gave a special thanks to Neil Loeding, and presented him with a certificate of thanks, declaring him the official "Keeper of the Cattails". Mayor McCarty, on behalf of the City Council, again thanked everyone involved for their hard work on the ordinance. Finance Director Brager reported that, in addition to normal duties, the Finance Department had been very busy working with the Council on the 1983 budget, and he felt a good job had been done, with the property tax increase being kept to 3.9%, while the City is maintaining their central services. Finance Director Brager reported they had assisted the Clerk/Administrator at the counting center for the primary election, and the ballot counter that malfunctioned has been sent out for repair and is ,--4ue back in time for the general election. ....inance Director Brager reported the special assess- ment for Silver Lake Woods has been certified with the County, and two pre -payments have been received. He reported also that they expect to continue work- ing on the budget and elections in the next quarter, and that they have received three proposals for the audit of the 1982 records. He reported also that the word processor will serve as a remote terminal at City Hall to hook up to the Ramsey County computer, and they hope to have the utility programs up by the first of the year, and hope to end 1983 with all systems operational at City Hall. He explained this should reduce some operating costs in data processing, and should make it a much more marketable system. He added they hope to develop a marketing plan to recruit other cities, which would lower the cost for Mounds View. Finance Director Brager reported the City is pretty much On target with the iIV01 . b(idbCt to V3 1. Park Director Anderson reported the third quarter had been very busy for the Rec programs, with the Festi+ral in the Park being a great success and ie opening of the Edgewood Community Resource Inter on September 15. October 11, 1982 Page. Seven Third Quarter Department Head Reports Hounds View City Council October 11, 1982 Regular Meeting Page Eight --------------------------------------------------------------------- Park Director Anderson reported the joint powers agree- ment with the City of New Brighton had been completed for the puppet wagon program, with a third staff person being added. He also reported that a childrens theater program had been started, with 30 children participating. Park Director Anderson reported the softball program was a huge'success, with over 100 teams participating, and they plan on the two additional fields at Silver View Park to help with the crowded schedule, but with the possibility of losing the two fields at Red Oak School. Park Director Anderson reported that Phase I at Silver View Park is almost complete, with the project being approximately $7,000 under budget to date. He also reported they hope the reseeding will take off soon. Park Director Anderson four park shelter buildings were removed, and a new one built at Lambert Park, with three new buildings having been Durchased recently. He also reported that the City had saved approxi- mately $16,000 through the use of CETA employees, and they are feeling the benefit of having Larry Decheine working on the park maintenance. He also reported over 900 trees had been planted to date, with 22 being stolen, and 230 trees being removed as of 9/l/82 due to diesease. He added that some trees had been transplanted, and seem to be doing well. Director Johnson reported the street department made three major repairs during the third quarter, and attempted to repair the storm sewer problem, and completed the seal coating. He added that Lift Station #3 had a burned out motor which was repaired, as well as the root treatment control program being completed. Director Johnson reported the I&I field study work was completed, with th c report due shortly. He also reported a stolen fire hydrant had been replaced, and the flushing of water mains was completed, with the water being very dark and rusty. He added they had started the servicing and painting program for the fire hydrants, and are 25% complete. Director Johnson reported they are preparing bids for the complete servicing of Well #5, and have completed 192 meter services and inspections. Mounds View City Council October 11, 1982 Regular Meeting Page -Nine ------------------------------------------------------------------------- --He also gave a summary of he Community Development ,:hat they have completed wetlands ordinance and ar plain ordinance, applications processed by Department, and reported the implementation of the e now working on the flood Motion/Second: Doty/Blanchard to approve the first rea ing o Ordinance No. 321, amending the municipal code of the City of Mounds View by creating Chapter 49, "Flood Plain Zoning Ordinance', and waive the reading of the ordinance, making it available at City Hall for review by residents. 5 ayes 0 nays Attorney Meyers reported he has read the proposed ordinance and finds there may be some overlap between the flood plain ordinance and wetland ordinance, and gave an example from page 6. Director Johnson responded that the two ordinances •sere worked in tandem, and while he feels they are onsistent, he cannot guarantee it. Motion/Second: McCarty/Doty to authorize Attorney Meyers a-n—T Staff to compare Chapters 49 and 48 and report back any inconsistencies. 5 ayes 0 nays Director Johnson was directed to forward the pro- posed ordinance to the DNR for their review, since their comments must be received before the second reading. It was noted that this item was discussed earlier in the meeting and will be placed on the agenda for discussion at a future agenda session. Park Director Anderson reported they had received the purchase agreement from Ernst Moversand they are ready to go. He reported the most difficult issue has been trying to locate the buildings at each park, with the final decision of the Park immission being to go with the Master Plan, even cough that may not be the most convenient location at each park presently. He reviewed the proposed locations for the Council and stated they would Put up maps in each building, showing the Master 9. Approval of Firs Reading of Ord. No. 321 Amending the Municipal Code of the City of Mounds View b Creating Chapter 49, "Flood Plain Ordinance" Motion Carried Motion Carried 10. Review of Lette to Past Due Utility and Tree Removal Accounts 11. Consideration of Staff Memo Regar� ing Park Shelter Buildings Mounds View City Council October 11, 1982 Regular Meeting Page Ten' ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Plan so the residents would understand whythe build- ings were located where they were. He added they will be coming in under budget, and all three build- ings will be ready no later than December 1. There was discussion regarding payment of fees for building permits, and the question was raised who would pay the highway permit fees for moving the buildings. Park Director Anderson was directed to check into those fees, and it was pointed out the Council had not signed the purchase agreement yet, in which those fees are assigned. Motion/Second: Blanchard/Hodges to rescind the Fes or t e building permits for the three park shelter buildings, but they must still retain the requirements. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Attorney Meyers stated he would meet with Park Director Anderson and Mr. Ernst on October 13 and work out an understanding on the fees. Park Director Anderson reviewed the recommendation 12. Consideratir from the Park and Rec Commission, endorsing the Staff Memo program in the City, ing Golden GJ 1 Boxing Program Mayor McCarty stated he was concerned with the City being held liable for any injuries. Park Director Anderson replied that the Golden Gloves sponsors are willing to enter into an agreement with the City to hold them harmless for any liability. Attorney Meyers recommended they should also file a certificate of insurance. Motion/Second: McCarty/Doty to endorse the Golden oves ox ng program at the Edgewood Community Resources Center, contingent upon receipt of the hold -harmless agreement in favor of the City and endorsement upon any insurance Golden Gloves may have in the case of a lawsuit, referring to liability. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Motion/Second: Blanchard/Forslund to amend the previous motion to include that there will be a six month trial period. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Card 1 Mounds View City Council October 11, 1982 Regular Meeting Page-Eleven -------------------------------------------------------- ----------------- Park Director Anderson explained he would like to 13. Consideration of �ake time off, with pay, to attend the National Park, Recreation .recreation and Park Association Congress, at his and Forestry own personal expense, and would require 3 days. Director Anderso Request for Time Mayor McCarty replied that Staff members are to Off with Pay to be granted compensation in time off for the extra Attend the 1982 hours they put in, and recommended Mr. Anderson National Recrea- use his comp time, and stated no action was tion and Park required since it was an administrative matter. Association Cong Motion/Second: McCarty/Blanchard to authorize e Cif receive the free fill from the property at 5071 Bona Road. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Director Johnson reported they have serviced 192 14. Report of Direc- meters and found a high percentage of unaccurate for of Public readings. He added a more detailed report would Works/Community be prepared at the end of the study, but explained Development the problem area has been identified as a batch of 300 meters, and asked approval to install 50 Rock- well meters from the supply to replace 50 of the Prroneous meters, at a cost of approximately 1,250. Motion/Second: McCarty/Blanchard to authorize t e 'reassignment :as gnment of $2,250 in the Water 700, Material and Supply account, to purchase water meters. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Director Johnson reported a second bid had been received for the sewer break on County Road H, and the problem appears to be much more expensive than was originally estimated. He noted the low bidder is ready to start irmediately upon award of the contract. Motion/Second: McCarty/Forslund to authorize Staff to ra-w from the SWM fund a maximum of $7,700, of which $6,840 will be paid to Dawson Construction, Inc. for repair of the storm sewer system on County Road H, east of Bvfia R-=-4. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Director Johnson reported that the motor from Lift ation #3 had failed and is being repaired, and was brought to his attention that the equipment may be needing servicing in the future. He added he would have more information for them later. Mounds View City Council Regular Meeting ---------------------------- Director Johnson reported the Long Lake Road ditch repair contract has not been completed yet, with the contractor being very overdue on his completion date, and after speaking with Attorney Meyers, was planning to send a letter to the contractor advising him he is responsible for all costs. Director Johnson reported he had received a letter from Pat Allen at Gunnar Isberg and Associates, clarifying her letter of October 1. He added Ms. Allen would like to attend the October 18 agenda meeting and address the Council. It was agreed that Ms. Allen could meet with the Council on the 18th, but would be limited to 30 minutes, do to the lengthy agenda, and could set an alternate date if she desired more than 30 minutes. Attorney Meyers reported he had received a copy of a memo regarding the airport operators meeting, and he has been asked for his opinion regarding the VASI which is proposed, He explained he is research- ing it with Mr. Karney, and it does not appear to be allowable, but is checking further with the FAA. October 11, 1982 Page Twelve.. 15. Report of Councilmember Forslund reported the Planning Commis- 16 sion has finished their review on the home occu- pations ordinance and will be forwarding it to the Council shortly, as well as Chapter 42. Councilmember Blanchard had no report. Councilmember Doty had no report. Councilmember Hodges had no report. Mayor McCarty had no report. Clerk/Administrator Pauley had no report. Motion/Second: Doty/Blanchard to adjourn the meeting at :23 PM. 5 ayes 0 nays ct Don T/Adminis �u Cle Reports :of %' Councilmembei.a 17. Report of Administrator 18. Adjournment Motion Carried J DATE APPROVED: 10/25/82 PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA Special Meeting October 18, 1982 Mounds View City Hall 2401 Hwy. 10, Mounds View City Hall ---------------------------------------------------------------------- The Mounds View City Council was called 1. CALL TO ORDER to order at 8:00 p.m. on October 18, 1982 by Mayor McCarty. Members present: Hodges, Forslund, 2. ROLL CALL Blanchard, Doty, McCarty Others present: Clerk/Administrator Pauley, Public Works/Community Develop- ment Director Johnson, Finance Director Brager, Director of Parks, Recreation & Forestry Anderson, and Public Works Foreman Kardell. Mayor McCarty presented a draft of a 3. PARKING ON letter and accompanying resolution COUNTY ROAD I previously adopted by the Ramsey County AND GREENFIELD Board of Commissioners regarding the AVENUE parking situation on County Road I and Greenfield Avenue. Mayor McCarty indicated that he felt that the situation had been mishandled in that a staff member had indicated to Ramsey County that it was the desire of the City that parking be prohibited on County Road I between Long Lake Road and Jackson Drive when the matter had not been presented to the Planning Commission or City Council for consideration. Also, he indicated that he felt that all requests for designation of no parking should be substantiated to justify such requests. Motion/Second: McCarty/Doty to direct that the letter in exact verbage presented by Mayor McCarty on October 18, 1982 be sent to the apartment building complex owners or managers and apartment residents, and a resolution be pre- sented for Council consideration indicating to Ramsey County that requests for actions regarding public safety be implemented through resolu- tion of the governing body. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Mounds View City Council October 18, Special Meeting Page Two ----------------------------------------------------------------- Motion/Second: McCarty/Doty that the staff member responsible for request to Ramsey County have a letter of reprimand placed in their personnel file for acting without proper authority, to be removed from the file after six months if there are no further violations by the staff member. Further violations will be met by suspension without pay under Section 6.13 of the Personnel Code, suspension terms to be determined by the Council. 4 ayes 1 nay Motion/Second: Doty/Hodges to adjourn at 8:19 p.m. 5 ayes 0 nays sp ctfu mi ted, Dd al F. Pau av Cle-Admiris rato Motion Carried Motion Carried 1982