HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packets - 1982/11/08CITY COUNCIL MEETING
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
November 8, 1982
7:30 p.m.
A G E N D A
1. Call to Order
2. Roll Call - Blanchard, Doty, Hodges, Forslund, McCarty
3. Approval of Minutes: October 25, 1982 (Regular Meeting)
November 3, 1982 (Canvassing Board Meeting)
4. Public Hearings - 7:40 p.m. - Rezoning of First State Bank of
New Brighton Property from B-3 to B-2
7:50 p.m. - Ordinance No. 322 Amending Chapter 40,
Regarding Home Occupations
8:00 p.m. - Ordinance No. 323 Amending Chapter 42,
Entitled "Subdivision Regulations"
8:10 p.m. - Subdivision and Rezoning of
8495 Red Oak Drive
8:20 p.m. - Relocation of Building Request for
7911 Spring Lake Road
5. Residents Requests and Comments from the Floor
------------------
CITIZENS: BEFORE SPEAKING PLEASE GIVE YOUR
FULL NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE MINUTES
------------•------------------------------------
6. Approval of Consent Agenda
ITEM A. Authorize Placement of No Parking Signs on West Side
of Edgewood Drive Across From Edgewood Community Center
and Staff Investigation of Parking Situation in Coordina-
tion with the School District
ITEM B. Approve Propane Conversion and Fuel Supply Request for
Proposal Specifications and Set Opening Date of 10:00 a.m.,
November 29, 1982
ITEM C. Authorize Advertisement for Bids for 1983 Police Squad
Car
ITEM D. Licenses for Approval
ITEM E. Approve Resolution No. 1512 Approving Just and Correct
Claims Against City Funds
-continued-
AGENDA
November 8, 1982
Page Two
7. Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance No. 319 Granting a
Franchise to Group W Cable of the North Suburbs, Inc., a
Minnesota Corporation, to Operate and Maintain a Cable
Communication System in the City; Setting Forth Conditions
Accompanying the Grant of Franchise; Providing for Regulation,
and Use of the System; and Prescribing Penalties of the
Violation of its Provisions
8. Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance No. 320 An Ordinance
Amending the Municipal Code of Mounds View by Amending Chapter 26,
Entitled "Public Improvements"
9. Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance No. 326 An Ordinance
Amending the Municipal Code of Mounds View by Amending Chapter 107,
Entitled "Bingo"
10. Report of Director of Public Works/Community Development
A. Letter from Fire Chief Ron Fagerstrom Concerning Street
Names in the Silver Lake Woods Addition
B. Status Report on Water Treatment Study
C. Status Report on Storm Water Management Plan
11. Report of Attorney
12. Report of Councilmembers
13. Report of Administrator
14. Adjournment
k4
PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA
r Regular Meeting
-) October 25, 1982
Edgewood Community Resource Center
Mounds View, MN 55112
The Mounds View City Council was called to order 1. Call to Order
by Mayor McCarty at 7:30 PM.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Councilmembers Forslund, Blanchard, 2. Roll Call
Doty, Hodges and Mayor McCarty.
ALSO PRESENT: City Attorney Meyers, Clerk/
A ministrator Pauley and Public Works/Community
Development Director Johnson.
Mayor McCarty closed the regular meeting and opened 3. Public Hearing
the public hearing at 7:31 PM. Cable TV
Jerry Skelly, chairman of the cable tv committee
in Mounds View, explained that the Mounds View
Cable Committee had been formed two and a half
years ago, and after some assessment, had joined
the North Suburban Cable Commission. Mr. Skelly
introduced the members present of Group W, a
subsidiary of Westinghouse Corporation, Roger
Frank, Bob Lucas, Ron Abrahms, Dave Lebanon and
Tom Creaton.
Mr. Frank presented Mayor McCarty with a check
for $1500, to cover the cost of the publication
for the gearing, as required by the charter. He
gave some background on Group W, explaining that
they are the third largest provider of cable
services in America, and the largest in Minnesota,
and then played a video presentation, explaining
the proposed cable system.
All members of the audience were given a brochure,
explaining the system and answering questions on
it, and Mr. Skelly and the members of Group W
were asked many questions, to which they provided
answers.
They explained that the system is promised for the
enCire nine suburbs within 18 months, with some
of those suburbs being operational in twelve
months, from the time of approval by the Cable
Boardwhich is expected on November 18, The
dividing line in Mounds View for the two time
periods is County Road I. The lines will be both
underground and above ground, depending upon the
topography, with approximately 20% being underground.
Mounds View City Council October 25, 1982-
Regular Meeting Page Two
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The rates for the system will be guaranteed for
three years after certification of the system,
and then the consumers are somewhat guaranteed 10
of reasonable prices due to the competitiveness
of the market.
Mayor McCarty expressed concern with pornography
possibly being passed through. It was explained
that Chanel 6 is regulated by the State, and that
while the franchise authority has no control over
what is passed through, they do have the autho-
rity to control what is broadcast in the City.
There was discussion regarding the requirement
that use be given to any group, without dis-
crimination, of free access chanels, and the
City's concern over controlling pornography.
It was noted that Group W would support the
City if the City was sued for stopping porno-
graphy, and would use their insurance bonds,
and letters of credit, as back-up. It was
noted there is a lock -out available for the
tv's, and that while there is no adult chanel
currently available, the City can add programs
as others are deleted, and the City would have
to consent to the choice of programs.
r
It was noted that a converter will be required
for each tv set that is to be hooked up to
cable, and the additional cost for each set is
$2.95. Also, 5% of the franchise fee for all
gross revenues will go to the City, with the
FCC requiring that the funds be spent on cable
related activity, with this 5% being in addition
to the $225,000 grant Group W is providing the
City.
Two studios are planned for the area, with one
being at the Fairview Community Center in Rose-
ville and the other hopefully at the Edgewood
Community Resource Center in Mounds View, with
workshops to be conducted to train people on
the use of the video equipment, so that anyone
who is interested can learn how to operate and
produce a program.
It is felt the marketplace will support the
industry. and Group W will he in on the new
technology as it occurs. The ordinance is
written so that if the cable system should
go bankrupt, it can be removed from the City.
Repair procedures were explained, and the
controls governing them.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley brou;;ht up that
the while the public works buil'Ing was not
Mounds View City Council i October 25, 1982
Regular Meeting Page Three
------------------------- 1-------- - ------ J------------------
originally listed for connection into the system,
f/1s Group W has agreed to connect it at no charge.
It was also noted that the City can add or delete
connections at any time.
Mayor McCarty thanked everyone involved for their
time and effort on the cable tv system. He closed
the public hearing and reopened the regular meeting
at 8:45 PM.
Motion/Second: Forslund/Hodges to approve the 4. Approval of
5cto er , 982 minutes as corrected. Minutes:
October 11, 19F,
5 ayes 0 nays and October 18,
1982
Motion Carried
Motion/Second: Hodges/Doty to approve the
cto er 18, 1982 minutes as corrected.
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
There were no residents requests or comments from 5. Residents Re -
the floor, quests and
Comments from
the Floor
Motion/Second: Blanchard/Forslund to approve the 6. Approval of
consent agenda as presented and waive the reading Consent Agenda
of the resolutions.
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Motion/Second: McCarty/Forslund to amend the
previous motion and pull item I for special atten-
tion.
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Mayor McCarty noted that the money that will be
saved by the City by having volunteers do the work
will be put in a special fund to be used for that
park. He added he thought it was an excellent
program and deserved attention.
&.16610fa/Second: McCarty/Blanchard to adopt Reso-
Nut—io—n-5-7306 and waive the reading.
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Mounds View City Council
Regular Meeting
Motion/Second: McCarty/Forslund to approve the
irstF reading of Ordinance No. 319, ar ordinance,
including addendum with exhibits, granting a
franchise to Group W Cable of the North Suburbs,
1ne., a Minnesota corporation, to operate and
maintain a cable communication system in the
City, setting forth conditions accompanying the
grant of'franchsie, providing for regulation and
use: of the system, and prescribing penalties for
the violation of its provisions, and waive the
entire reading.
5 ayes 0 nays
Attorney Meyers advised that page 20, section
should be revised to add the Mounds View City
Hall and Maintenance Building.
Motion/Second: Doty/Blanchard to amend the
rangy Tie ordinance on page 20 to add the
Maintenance Building.
5 ayes 0 nays
Clerk/Administrator Pauley explained this ordi-
nance will revise Chapter 107 to include gambling
devices, raffles and bingo.
Motion/Second: Hodges/Forslund to approve the
irst� of Ordinance No. 326 and waive
the reading.
4 ayes l.nay
Councilmember Doty stated he had voted against the
motion because, while State law allows gambling
by non-profit organization, he personally does not
feel it is beneficial.
Dave Brick presented the Council with the monthly
report for September. He reported the Department
has applied to send officers to the breathalizer
school in January. He also reported that evalua-
tions had just been completed and they hope to
continue doing them on a six month basis.
Officer Brick reported they are in the process of
setting up a CPR course for the department, and
some maintenance employees have expressed an
interest in participating.
Officer Brick explained that emphasis has been
put on going back to the residential streets
rather than traffic enfo: ::t• He reported
burglaries nrt tioqu 50% a DWI's are up over
October 25, 1982
Page Four
,.,
First kea6l-
of Ordinal 110 •
319
Motion Carried
Motion Carried
First Read'"`
Ordinance,
Amending the 1
cipal Code of
Mounds View b,
Amending Chap
107, Entitled
"Bingo"
Motion Carried
Third Quarter
Department Head
Reports - Polic
Department
to
'Mounds View City Council 1 October 25, 1982
Regular Meeting Page Five
------------------------- r----------- -_----------------- ------
rollast year, with total calls being up over 200
l over last year.
Motion/Second: Doty/Hodges to approve Resolution 10. Consideration c
I ,requesting Ramsey County implement public Resolution No.
safety actions upon request of City Council 1507 Requesting
only. Ramsey County
Implement Publi
5 ayes 0 nays Safety Actions
upon Request of
City Council On
Motion Carried
Motion/Second: McCarty/Forslund to approve the 11. Consideration o
policy procedure, as presented by Staff in the Staff Memorandui
October 21, 1982 memo, and the 1983 specs for the Regarding the
City Newsletter. 1983 Specifica-
tions for the
5 ayes 0 nays City Newsletter
Motion Carried
Motion/Second: Doty/Hodges to approve Ordinance 12. First Reading o:
go_.JZU amending the municipal code of Mounds View Ordinance No. 3:
by amending Chapter 26, entitled "Public Amending the
Improvements", and waive the reading. Municipal Code c
Mounds View by
5 ayes 0 nays Amending Chapter.
26, Entitled
"Public Improve-
ments"
Motion Carried
Clerk/Administrator Pauley explained the ordinance.
Motion/Second: McCarty/Forslund that the Council
a ds in the verbage after a public hearing, "as
provided in Chapter 8 of the Home Rule Charter".
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Director Johnson reported he had received a call 13. Report of Direct
from TKDA, advising they are ready to present of Public Works/
the I&I study report. Community Develc
lotion/Second: McCarty/Doty to set a time at the ment
ovem er agenda session for the TKDA presen-
tation.
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carries
Mounds View City Council t October 25, 1§82
Regular Meeting Page Six
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Director Johnson advised there are problems with the
lift station that has already been repaired. He
stated he will be investigating further, and wanted
to alert the Council that repairs could be very
expensive and may have to be done on an emergency
basis. He added he would keep the Council posted.
Attorney Meyers had no report. 14. Report of
Attorney
Councilmember Forslund had no report. 15. Reports of
Councilmembers
Councilmember Blanchard had no report.
Councilmember Doty reported the National Guard
has tried to rescue the digger that is sinking on
County Road I but were not successful.
Councilmember Hodges reported he had attended
the Youth Services Bureau meeting, and that
Arden Hills has joined the group. He reported
they are working for United Way funding. He
added he has reports on the cases handled by
the Bureau for anyone who would like to review
them.
Mayor McCarty requested a memo explaining the
duties of the liason to the Youth Service
Bureau, for discussion at the next agenda session.
Mayor McCarty reported there will be a public hearing
November 4 of the Physical Development Committee
to discuss the subject of the proposed amendment
to the sanitary sewer system in New Brighton and
Mendota Heights.
Mayor McCarty reported he had attended the suburban
rate authority hearing, where he recommended that
all member Cities separate their MWCC charges from
their City charges, which was received very well.
Mayor McCarty questioned why the water is still
cloudy in oarfa of the Giro after the flushing
has been done. Director Johnson reported they
can check on the volume of water being pumped,
but it is felt they overworked the system during
the summer, and will have to perform extensive
maintenance on ;hu wells this fall. He added
they hope to locate the problems and take care
of them by spring. Mayor McCarty suggested
meeting with consultants to discuss airators.
Director Johnson reported that two part time
emplgyees will be ending their a !loyment.wi
We b ty ih the i Kitt WO w^eks. 11 added the:
Mounds View City Council 9 October 25, 1982
Regular Meeting Page Seven
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
are advertising for a full time person, and he
I hopes to have a reconmendation for the Council
soon, as they will be short handed during the
next few weeks.
Motion/Second: McCarty/Doty that Council direct
MaTt to prepare the options available to discuss
at the next agenda session, including the possi-
bility of outside contractors, to achieve the
servicing of the airators and water filters or
other necessary work to resolve the water
problem.
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported he had con- 16. Report of
tacted Don Bush regarding a meeting with the Administrator
Spring Lake Park Council on the signalization
on Highway 10, but he had not heard back from
him yet.
Mayor McCarty noted that Director Johnson will
be appraising the Council on a weekly basis of
the status of the storm water management plan.
Motion/Second: Forslund/Hodges to adjourn the 17. Adjournment
meeting �40 PM.
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Respectfully submitted,
Donald F. Pauley
Clerk/Administrator
41K')C-�
PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA
Canvassing Board Meeting
November 3, 1982
' Mounds Vicw City Hall
2401 Hwy. 10, Mounds View City Hall
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Acting Mayor Forslund called the meeting 1. CALL TO ORDER
to order at 7:00 p.m. on November 3, 1982.
Members present: Acting Mayor Forslund, 2. ROLL CALL
Councilmembers Hodges, Doty, and Blanchard
Others present: Clerk/Administrator Pauley
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reviewed the 3. RESOLUTION NO. 1510,
results of the November 3, 1982 General RESOLUTION CANVASSING
Election and the information contained in ELECTION RESULTS OF THE
Resolution No. 1510. NOVEMBER 2, 1982
Motion/Second: Forslund/Doty to refer the GENERAL ELECTION
results for the Mayor and Councilmember
positions back to the Election Judges for a
recomputation of the ballots. After discussion
of the manner in which the ballots are counted
and reported and the fact that the ballots are
in the possession of the Ramsey County Elections
Office and any recount would need to be performed
by Ramsey County, Councilmember Doty withdrew
his second and Councilmember Forslund withdrew
her motion.
Motion/Second: Doty/Forslund to adopt
Resolution No. 1510, Resolution Canvassing
Election Results of the November 2, 1982
General Election and to waive the reading of
the resolution.
4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Motion/Second: Doty/Hodges to adjourn at 4. ADJOURNMENT
7:28 p.m.
4 ayes 0 nays
Motion Carried
Respectfully submitted,
Donald F. Pauley
Clerk -Administrator
r
1 MEMO TO: City Council
Clerk -Administrator
Director of Public Works/Community Development
FROM: Engineering/Planning Technician
DATE: October 21, 1982
SUBJECT: FIRST STATE BANK REZONING
Attached with this memo are copies of the following:
1) A letter from Edward Kristryniak of New Brighton State
Bank requesting, per Development Agreement No. 81-47,
that the Bank property be rezoned from B-3 to B-2; and
2) The section of Development Agreement No. 81-47 regarding
this rezoning; and
3) Ordinance No. 324 amending Chapter 41, Specific Rezonings
to reflect this rezoning.
This item is being placed on your upcoming agenda for discussion
with staff. The public hearing was set at your October 25th
meeting with the actual. hearing to take place on November 8th.
If you have any questions concerning the above, please contact me.
FJK/bc
Attachments
C!"
FIRST STATE BANK
of NEW BRIGHTON
2209 PALMER DRIVE
NEW BRIGHTON, MINN. 55112
PHONE: 612/636.4300
SrpLember 23, 1982
City of Mounds View
2401 Highway 10
Mounds View, Minnesota 55112
Attention: City Council of Mounds View
Dear Council Members:
In conjunction with Development Agreement #81-47,
Exhibit 2A - Section 3, the First State Bank of New
Brighton formally requests that the property be rezoned
from 8-3 to B-2.
Please notify us regarding your action.
Yours truly,
Edward Kristyniak i
Vice President/Cashier
EK/ng
J
■ MEMBER FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION
1•:X111111T 2A
DEVELOPMENT AGRI.I:MENT NO. 81-47
In -addition to l.hc foregoing conditions, Developer ayrees to
Lhc folluwing:
1) Screening along Lhe abutting residential properties be
sLandard, meeting the requirements of Mounds View Code,
Section 40.04, Subdivision G.
2) The lots described below be combined as one:
Spring Lake Park Hillview Addition
Lots 108, 109, 110 and 111
✓ 3) The four lots described above be rezoned from B-3 to B-2.
4) The traffic be monitored on a regular basis for lane
modification if necessary.
5) The grading plan be altered so as to provide 0.46 acre
feet of storage (22,000 cubic feet) with a combined out-
flow from the ponding sites of 1.0 cubic feet per second.
The two ponds should be interconnected so that one pipe
would be the control structure to the highway ditch, and
Lhe outlet pipe should be reinforced concrete pipe.
FOR THE CITY:
FOR TH; DEVELOPER:
I/ i
Date: July 17, 1981 By
L. M i
ORDINANCE NO, 324
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF MOUNDS VIEW
BY AMENDING CHAPTER 41 ENTITLED, "SPECIFIC REZONINGS"
The Council of Mounds View does hereby ordain:
41.08 Pursuant to Chapter 40.23, the Official Mounds
View Zoning Map is hereby amended to reflect the follow-
ing rezoning:
Subdivision 1.
Spring Lake Park Hillview Addition, Lots 108, 109,
110 and Ill are hereby rezoned from B-3 to B-2.
This ordinance shall take effect 30 days after the date of .its
publication.
Read by the Council of the City of Mounds View on the day of
1982. r/ Read and passed by the Council of the City of Mounds View this
day of 1982.
ATTEST:
Mayor
(SEAL)
Clerk -Administrator
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney
4►rII-1-i
-��o�1,)
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
FOR AMENDMENT OF CHAPTER 40 ENTITLED,
"ZONING" REGARDING HOME OCCUPATIONS
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Mounds View City
Council will meet on Monday, November 8, 1982 at 7:50 p.m.
at Mounds View City Hall, 2401 Highway 10, Mounds View,
Minnesota, 55112, to consider Ordinance No. 322 amending
Chapter 40 of the Municipal Code entitled, "Zoning", as
it pertains to home occupations.
Anyone desiring to be heard with reference to
this matter may be heard at this meeting.
Donald F. Pauley
Clerk -Administrator
(Bulletin: October 28, 1982)
ORDINANCE NO. 322
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
AMENDING THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF MOUNDS VIEW BY AMENDING
CHhPTER 40.02, ZONING, RULES AND DEFINITIONS, AND 40.10,
ZONING, R-1 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
The Council of the City of Mounds View does hereby ordain:
SECTION I. Chapter 40.02, Subdivision B(50) is hereby amended to
read as follows:
(50) Home Occupation. Any occupation which is clearly
secondary to the main use of the premises as a
dwelling and does not change the character thereof.
(40.10, Subdivision C(3).)
SECTION II. Chapter 40.10. R-1 Single Family Residential District
is hereby amended to read as follows:
Subdivision C.
(3) Home Occupations. The regulation of home occupations
within residential structures is intended to insure
that the occupational use is clearly accessory or
secondary to the principal dwelling use and that com-
patability with surrounding residential uses is
maintained. No home occupation shall be allowed which:
(a) Involves employees other than persons residing
on the premises;
(b) involves alteration or construction features
not customarily found in dwellings;
(c) has an exterior display or sign in excess of
one (1) square foot. Such sign, for identifi-
cation purposes only, shall be located on
either the principal structure or garage. Any
sign existing prior to December 29, 1972, shall
not be enlarged but may be continued at the
size and location upon such date except as here-
inafter specified, or subsequently amended.
Any sign erected after December 29, 1972, but
prior to the adoption of this Code shall come
into compliance with this section of the Code by
April 1, 1983;
(d) involves exterior storage of equipment or
materials;
Ordinance No. 322
Page Two
(c) qu craLcs more than two motor vehicles ❑t a
time for either off-street or on -street parking;
(f) results in violation of the provisions of Chap-
ter 90 (Nuisances) of the Municipal Code; and
(g) involves activity visible from the public streets.
This Ordinance shall take effect 30 days after the date of its
publication,
Read by "lie Council of the City of Mounds View on the _ day of
1982.
Read and passed by the Council of the City of Mounds View this
day of , 1982.
ATTEST:
Mayor
1
(SEAL)
Clerk -Administrator
APPROVED AS TO FORM;
ty Attorney
J
V.0(Pm
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
FOR REVISION OF CHAPTER 42
ENTITLED, "SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS"
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Mounds View City
Council will meet on Monday, November 8, 1982 at 8:00 p.m.
at Mounds View City Hall, 2401 Highway 10, Mounds View,
Minnesota, 55112, to consider Ordinance No. 323 revising
Chapter 42 entitled, "Subdivision Regulations".
Anyone desiring to be heard with reference to this
matter may be heared at this meeting.
Donald F. Pauley
Clerk -Administrator
I
(Bulletin: October 28, 1982)
ORDINANCE N0. 323
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
AMENDING THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW BY AMENDING
CHAPTER 42, "SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS"
The City Council of the City of Mounds View does hereby ordain:
(See attached amendment)
Read by the Council of the City of Mounds View on the day
of , 1982.
Read and passed by the Council of the City of Mounds View on this
day of , 1982
ATTEST:
Mayor
(SEAL)
Clerk -A ministrator
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ty Attorney
RESOLUTION NO. 1511
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
SPATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANNING CASE 115-82
A MINOR SUBDIVISION REQUEST
Jt K-jq
�:160
WHEREAS, a minor subdiivison has been requested by James
Pietrowski for property located at 8495 Red Oak Drive; and
WHEREAS, the minor subdivision request meets and exceeds
minimum Code requirements for frontage and area; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Pietrowski has agreed to pay a Park Fund Dedica-
tion in the amount of $176.00 as required by City Code; and
WHEREAS, the Mounds View Planning Commission has reviewed the
subdivision request and has recommended approval in Resolution No.
G3-82;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View City
Council hereby approves the minor subdivision request of James
Pietrowski at 8495 Red Oak Drive;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mounds View City Council re-
quires the payment of $176.00 for Park Fund Dedication prior to the
City Clerk approving and signing the subdivision deed.
Adopted this 8th day of November, 1982.
ATTEST: _
Mayor
(SEAL)
Clerk -Administrator
ORDINANCE NO, 325
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESO'TA
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF
MOUNDS VIEW BY AMENDING CHAPTER 41 ENTITLED,
"SPECIFIC REZONING"
The Council of Mounds View does hereby ordain:
41.09 Pursuant to Chapter 40.23, the Official Mounds
View zoning Map is hereby amended to reflect the
following rezoning:
Subdivision 1.
Unplatted Lands
Except County Road J and except the south 3,198
feet, the east 120 feet of the west 792 feet of
the northeast 1/4 of Section 6, Township 30,
Range 23 is hereby rezoned from R-1 to R-2.
This Ordinance shall take effect 30 days after the date of its
publication.
Read by the Council of the City of Mounds View on the day of
1982.
Read and passed by the Council of the City of Mounds View this
day of , 1982.
ATTEST:
Mayor
(SEAL)
Clerk -Administrator
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
FOR SUBDIVISION AND REZONING
NOTICE•' IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Mounds View City
Council will meet on Monday, November 8, 1982 at 8:10 p.m, to
consider the subdivision and rezoning request of Jim Pietrowski
at 8495 Red Oak Drive from R-1, Single Family Residential to
R-2, Single and Two Family Residential. The property is
legally known as:
Unplatted Lands
Except County Road J and except the south 3,198
feet, the east 120 feet of the west 792 feet of
the northeast 1/4 of Section 6, Township 30,
Range 23
Anyone desiring to be heard with reference to this matter
may be hoard at this meeting.
Donald F. Pauley
Clerk -Administrator.
(Bulletin: October 28, 1982)
oq - Y
CASE: 116-82, ltem 5 on 11/3/82 Planning Commission Agenda 070j(�Mq
ITIIM: Buildinq Relocation
APPLICANT: Isabella Willa
LOCATION: 7911 Spring Lake Road
SUMMARY OF REQUEST
See attached letter of request.
PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS
1. The existing building at 7911 Spring Lake Road will be demolished
immediately following the granting of an occupancy permit for the
relocated structure.
2. Instead of 50 feet as stated in the letter, the applicant is
proposing to locate the building 105 feet from the street (91
feet from the front property line). Another building on the
block (7865 Spring Lake Road) is located 71 feet from the front
property line so this house would be set further back and thus
meet front yard setback requirements. The lot measures 115 feet
wide, the relocated house is 38 feet wide, and the applicant would
like to place the house 37 feet from the south line. All setback
requirements will be met (see sketch).
3. The existing house is not connected to either. Mounds View water
o•• sewer. Connection will have to be made to either Mounds View
or Spring Lake Park water and sewer. The property has been
assessed for both sewer and water availability. The City will
have to decide the best way to provide water and sewer service to
this lot as part of the building relocation approval.
4. See attached memo from the Building Inspector regarding the
relocated house's condition.
5. This item is being presented to the Planning Commission for your
review and recommendation to the City Council. It will go before
the City Council at a public hearing on November 8, 1982.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION 11/4/82
Adopted Resolution No. 65-82 approving relocation of building request.
Mr. & Mrs. Louis Wills
7911 Spring Lake Rd.
Mpls., MN 55h32 10
October 22, 1982
Mounds View city council;
As owners of the lot at 7911 Spring Lake Road would like to
ini'orm you of' our intent of relocating a house on this lot.
The home we wish to relocate is a one story rambler measuring
32ft. X 38ft.. We intend to excavate a full basement for
the house to be set on. Fr,m our inspection of the house it
does meet all building codes.
The lot at 7911 Spring Lake Rd. measures 115ft. wide by 465ft.
deep. We would like to set the house 50 feet back from the
road and 37 feet from our south lot line.
The house that presently sits on our lot will be demolised
as soon as an occupancy permit is granted for the relocated
house.
We would like to accomplish the relocation as soon as possible,
and appreciate your prompt attention to the above matter. 7
Verr truly your, ),dA
Mr. Louis Wille
r
MEMO TO: Engineering/Planning Technician
FROM: Building Inspector
DATE: October 28, 1982
SUBJECT: HOUSE RELOCATION REQUEST
An Dipsection was made of the dwelling requested to be relocated
in Mounds View on October 26, 1982. The dwelling was found to be
in good condition and sound. Pictures are available for your
review. The dwelling has the following:
3 bedrooms
1: baths (mudroom)
painted redwood siding
plastered interior
oak floors
galvanized and cast iron plumbing
greenfield wiring
Section 45.04 requires that the dwelling meet minimum code require-
ments. Modifications of the bedroom windows and additional insula-
tion may be necessary. The installation of a smoke detector will
also be necessary. Additional items may become necessary at the time
of relocation if they become apparent, but the items mentioned above
are believed to be the major items.
Should you have any questions regarding this report, please contact
me.
SAR/bc
.
• I
I L'I 'ii
Ij
• \YUYII
FIII II.
' A� •
" IINV'.I 1
II
q)I
il.l
I
1 tnl
T,i
I
•I
��n..ILi
nlu,
I1
I
IL
rl
1'
1
19
:�� /
L it
:jl
•II
n+L
i
I
PI
(11 .WIr �
IIFI
`Il I
IVI 'I 41 1::P',IN YIr r II
II I
, v/�
r IN, MP isIN Fla""
pW/oN, Way MO ,Fw10 ml
larval.
N YI,J
'.14 I, umrb6
T,,,W,mml
I a•`\
.I
Li
w , W. Ner 1llr
II 1�
•4
it..:..
�1'IL
•r 4
Y
,I I
51�'6 0> y�ii
RELOG I
I
9
n
-
04 �----27 f 2 ®; a
g t� -�� I I s 11.
I.o• r� �,. Ico I I ,
tDM. // \
T.TIM -_-
Z147. qw Al" ' ac __ i) I
1.4Sa I I_-1] -N.c OI pB, 11I
O CHURCH I I 19 '� /`i al•e I ,eo. 1 �d r—'So
�
U: r20
I]/iL I I Ic
1
I tl•L 152
MOW Ai o- -SIT i I I I T. SS 7eK
Y .AS S9 �. J58 45 IB4.4G 1. I I !]s uo i
I La.
O ° ' ..,� gsl bF BUI
a]LP, I -nnr
Z ...14• .. I1�1,�S _ oi� ' _ l.g�.A'�1�Ii1 9 I i I i 9 !! 1 w li
Q 7 2 3G•c o,0 1 eA •c o!0 " t ._ �. l ,i
J L! 24 _..{14 I n I p I) 'T
I .7Dec - LW
ol/t I I to IA 57�
x4
FV 9
nt.a
2 b I I O - 1 4! Mvii(T
/� -Ilc I; 4 • 3 z •PGA : --�
/ . is
ODAKWOOD OR. A 1 t5\n'L
IDG°e
C I cr \�G� 6 ,• I
a r ° 65�0IW 120.23 - r
n /t] 3- 2 S2
„ ^
a---- ---
ozoow I� I li'l
` pe ( ]t.., I I +it`77
1 7!>4 Ix
5 ,S7 •c e. ill..... ,471
..,:+, r7:/ 3 - ]
14014 ES —I 'J ,Ito
— N 1 I'
s•\.ct 1 I
Dp, .eo
x 4n... 090 2
0178) :� •An,
o beo zy I
Qad I I
� uDrl N' H
_.,., ,64a, / l
—it'LI ?I
�:
hT•oBQ
wn• �
a �
V
'h2'obo
71
wp
I m_j
I
,t. 1 tl0 0oom"00 - -- _.----
I W�(Mrl'zlm�
of
rm
OLopu,—
— ox. I ow oco I cao i Inm, -,. J
CL
' / n " Ii .• ,orb
IN —_
wf,%.10
10�
1 -F rr .,
Z� i � S31—IIM '•,alx l
os
'u
I L^SL_ I � ' N
°' O4. i I �3MSs 'd'TS
Gil
f, , a,
Nut"ka
•• �I
••
I
q I it oa
I��n.
D
tr oso
to
o
� ,��
FZ•OIl
•�
P7
FZ OF/
r`
PD'fdb•-.
tj
,
SE T t:
�J
ierr
Yil
pLOii
i
•�.w'
y`
•f
9
cv �cvov
�
w1f91
"� GL SY
a a I a ' /R cl
oco Io'' a ��o_LoJI /OxJ
O
'1",:fJoxl II
}/ t 61 � I H:)anw:)
— -'
C..
SIT
?s 1dM d'� S i-t" '
z
,W
oro "2L
-
„cr1
QI b
--
0
MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. 65-B2
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING THE APPROVAL OF THE
RELOCATION OF A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE ONTO
PROPERTY LOCATED AT 7911 SPRING LAKE ROAD
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has received a request from
Mrs. Isabella Wille to move an existing single family structure onto
a lot located at 7911 Spring Lake Road; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed staff reports
relavent to this request; and
WHEREAS, the location of the building to be located onto the
property meets and exceeds all Zoning Code requirements; and
WHEREAS, some minor modifications and additions may be required
to conform to minimum Building Code requirements;
' NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning
Commission recommends approval of the request from Mrs. Isabella Wille
of 7911 Spring Lake Road to relocate a single family dwelling onto the
existing lot contingent upon the building meeting all State Building
Code requirements prior to occupancy;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the building existing on said lot
will be demolished immediately following the granting of a final
occupancy notification for the relocated structure.
Adopted this 3rd day of November, 1982.
ATTEST:
Chairman
(SEAL)
Public Works/Community Development
Director
W
CONSENT AGENDA
November 8, 1982
The Consent Agenda is a technique designed to expedite handling of
routine and miscellaneous official business of the City Council.
The entire Agenda may be adopted by the Council in one motion. The
motion for adoption is non -debatable and must receive unanimous
approval. By request of any individual Councilmember, any item can
be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed upon the Regular Agenda
for debate.
ITEM A. Authorize Placement of No Parking Signs on West Side of
Edgewood Drive Across From Edgewood Community Center and
Staff Investigation of Parking Situation in Coordination
with the School District
ITEM B. Approve Propane Conversion and Fuel Supply Request for
Proposal Specifications and Set opening Date of 10:00 a.m.,
November 29, 1982
ITEM C. Authorize Advertisement for Bids for 1983 Police Squad Car
ITEM D. Licenses for Approval
General - Expire 6/30/83
Capp Homes, Division of Evans Products - Renewal
Heating & Air Conditioning - Expire 6/30/83
J & J Heating a Sheet Metal - Renewal
More's Burner Service - Renewal
Asphalt - Expire 6/30/83
Minnesota State Curb -Gutter Corporation - New
ITEM E. Adopt Resolution No. 1512 - Approving Just and Correct
Claims Against City Funds
TO: Mayor, City Council, and
Clerk -Administrator
FROM: Police Chief Grabowski
DATE: November 2, 1902
RE: 1903 Squad Car
Request permission to release bids November 15, 1982, for a new
marked squad car for delivery in 1983.
Attached is a copy of specifications.
fI
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
2401 Highway 10
New Brighton, Minnesota 55112
PROPOSAL FOR POLICE PATROL CAR
TO: The City Council of Mounds View
The undersigned hereby agrees to furnish Patrol Car in accordance
with specifications on file in the office of the Clerk -Administrator
and which are attached:
QUANTITY DESCRIPTION TOTAL COST
1 1983 Police Patrol Car j
Model No.
Make
PRICE INCLUDING ALTERNATES
It is agreed that the Patrol Car will be delivered F.O.B.
City of Mounds View; that the price quoted is net price which
excludes Federal Tax and that delivery shall be made within
days of receipt of order.
Enclosed is a ( Cashier's Check), (Certified Check), (Bid
Bond) in the amount of _` dollars, being at least five
percent (5%) of the amount of the proposal made payable to the
City of Mounds View as a proposal guarantee, which it is agreed f
by the undersigned will be forfeited in the event tiie Patrol
Cars are not delivered if the bid is awarded to the undersigned.
The proposal shall remain open for acceptance by the City for
thirty (30) days after being opened.
ica
NAME OF INDIVIDUAL, PARTNER, OR CORPORATION
ADDRESS
AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE
TITLE TELEPHONE NUMBER
NOTICE OF BIDS
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW, MINNESOTA
NOTICE 15 IIf.REBY GIVEN that sealed bids will be received by the
CiLy of Mounds View until 9:00 AM, December 6, 1982, and then will
be publicly opened and read aloud. Bids are being requested on the
fallowing:
1 1983 Pol ice. Patrol Car
in accordance with specifications on file in the office of the City
Administrator, 2401 Highway 10, Mounds View, Minnesota 55112.
All bids shall be submitted on forms on file at City Hall, in the
officer of City Administrator, and will he furnished free to each
bidder upon request.
The dealer shall supply maunufacturer's brochure, including specifications
on vehicles bid.
Any deviations from the following specifications must be clearly
indicated by the bidder with explanation, otherwise it will be
considered that this bid is in strict complaince. It should be noted
that when BRAND NAMES, or manufacl.urers numbers are stated in the
specifications, they are intended to establish a standard only and
are not restrictive unless the bid states "NO SUBSTITUTE". Rids will
be considered on all makes, models, or brands having com arable dualit ,
stile and piorkmanshjl that have demonstrated an equal performance
acceptable to the Mounds View City Council.
The Council shall consider the bids on December 13, 1982, and reserve
the right to reject any and all hidq.
BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL
Dated: November 15, 1982
Don Pauley, City Administrator
DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS FOR POLICE PATROL SEDAN:
Bidder's
Yecifications
jWnimum Requirements) Specification
1.
Body Type
4-door w/tinted safety glass only
2.
Wheelbase
Not to exceed 116 inches
3.
Engine
Minimum 250 cubic inch to maximum
307 cubic inch 2 barrel carburetion
with EPA rating of minimum 18 miles
per gallon city driving
4.
Radiator
Heavy duty _
5.
Transmission
Automatic, 3 speed, heavy duty,
low gear lockout, auxiliary trans-
mission cooler. Turbo Hydromatic
400 or equivalent.
6.
Generating
System
Alternator, 90 amp. minimum
7.
Battery
4000 watt minimum
8.
Rear axle
Heavy Duty
9.
Differential
Locking differential
10.
Brakes
Power, disc front, semi, metallic
lining
11.
Springs
Front and rear heavy duty
12.
Tires
First line four -ply tubeless,
steelbelted P225-70, 15 inch
13.
Frame
Full frame construction from
front to rear
14.
Steering
Power
15.
Seating
Bench, heavy duty, also heavy
duty front seat frame with full
depth padding
16.
Color
Light blue
17.
Accessory
Equipment
A. Air conditioner with high
pressure, high temperature
automatic Cutout.
B. Two spotlights, installed by
dealer, 4 inch sealed beams,
left and right.
C. Fresh air -hot water heater
with defroster attachment
D. Front and rear bumper guards
E. Dual rear tail lights and stop
lights. Parking and tail lights
to be flashing
F. Heavy duty shock absorbers
G. Instrument panel, standard
grouping
Accessory Equipment
continued
il. Front ashtray and lighter
I. Speedometer - must be accurate to
within 2% of all speeds to 100 MPII
and shall indicate speed in five or
less miles per hour divisions, needle
type indicator
J. Rearview mirror, day and night
type
K. Sway bar, heavy duty type
L. Oil pressure gauge
M. Amp meter, numeral lighted
N. Dash -controlled trunk release
0. Interior hood release
P. Trunk light - to light when trunk
lid opens
Q. Standard AM radio
R. Rear window defogger
S. Tinted glass throughout
T. Remote left and right hand exterior
mirrors
U. Intermittent windshield wipers
V. Tilt wheel
W. Power doorlocks
the detailed specification forms shall be completed by answering "yes" or
"no" in the provided blanks and by providing a detail for each item of the
model, type for where necessary), a description of what is to be provided.
This additional information shall be attached to the detailed specification
form.
1{I1;;01.,UTfO,,I NU. 1512 a e
1:1,Tf uF fOMP.,l VIEW
01PUTY OF RAi ;EY
AI'I'IIOVINII dlL'.;I' AND WiMECT
r.LAUd9 ArAI'll:;T CITY PIINIG
691EAWA.:, I.hr Nf t:i-mwiI of 3amid:: 9;r•;•+ pnl'auaut to
1Ain1uao1.n t;l.nlul.cr l,l;'.(;;I, has full :ml.horil;r over Lhe flmuleial affeirs
.11' I.br• (Ty :nul;
9111haih:Af;, The City Couo-.11 han reviewed Lhr: claimn tmmnbera:
17862 1-hrough 17868 ill Lhc mrovinl. of .p, 36,167.42
10190 I.lu•oot i, 10283 in Lhr: nirunmi. r r %r, 38,227.72
17869 Lluougll .17872 ill t,ha ammlid, of $ 12,294.36
LIn'nnt;h in Lllu: nahaml, nl' t
'I'OTM. AMAINT OF HAIR; I'Nh:1A?NTh3) 'r 86,689.50
:mil Inc: I'nund :::rld ra:riwa to be gnat nu,l cnrrccl,;
(11A of nny exception)
r
IJuY! TIII!RF.FOIII?, be it resolved that the City Council of Mounds View
herr'bp sppruvarl I.11v :l(J:l;!IWd 1i^L:; of eL•1!nn; dated by the
vote nyen
AT E;;I';
C1erY.-AdmiulrLrntor
CHECK
17869
17870
17871
17872
ADDITIONAL NECESSARY EXPENDITURES
AMOUNT CLAIMANT
$5,150.00: Stenco Construction
4,775.00 TKDA
444.00 Short, Elliott & Hendrickson
1,925.00 Gunnar Isberg and Associates
$12,294.36
PURPOSE
Capital - Bldg. & Structures
I/I Study
Professional services
Professional services
CITY OF MrUN;
VTFW
A C f C U N T S P A Y A 0 L E
OATE 11—I9-8% PAGE
1
CHfCK4 A
M 0 U N T
( L A! P A N I
P U R F 0 S F
'<
017862
963.21
STATE IREASUP,FS
k E F U N
017863
216.67
CO4NISSIONFR OF PEVENUE
R E F U N C
— 017864
1132P. 11
ENA^IhASSEN 0 Mr EF THEAFR
=UPFLIE ,CPERATII
00865
1.46.43
P"LCrNTIAL INS CO
GROUP INELRANCE
—-
', z
ANO-TNSURANEE i I
NUS ` ,
017866
281 321. 14
FIFST STATE EAWK OF
SALARIES, REGLLAi
ANO—'ALARIES,TEFF#PART
TIME
At+C—P,EPAI65ITIES':'j,
S
017867
2,245.13
STCTt TREAS — F E. ,: A
PENSION:
1r
t
017868
2,852.24
STATE .REASURF.R
PFNSION5
7
U,167.42
NECESSARY EXP,NOIiURES SINCE
LAST COUNCIL FEET INC
•n,
a�
.,
CI'Y OF MOUE,
VI' w
A C !' C L IN i P A Y A ^ L E
CATS ll-I9-82 PC( 2
CHECK' A
M 0 U N i
C L A 1 4 A N T
P U R F 0 S E
•
0 11119 0
20.20
ALOINSCH
SUPPLIES,CPERATING
�®
010191
9.38
AhfP,ICAN LINEN iUPPLY CC
CLEANING-TONELS # RAGS
i
i1M
•
yi
010192
121.34
APSENAL SAMO GRAVEL CO
SLPPLICS, 6LOGS4CRNOS
ANO-P.LFAIFS, UTILITIES
e.
010191
22.73
AR SIGN
OTHER FFCFESCION'AL SERV ._
010194
359.91
EACON ELECTRTC
SUPPLIES, UTILITIES
e
010195
1,288.56
BOLGER PUBLICATIONS
PRIMING
J
010196
72,00
CAPITAL ELECTRONIC_'
COMMUNICATIONS -TELEPHONE_____
010197
30,07
THOMAS L CHAFFEE
COMMUNICATIONS-TELEFHONE
OSOi98
56.32
CHIPPEKA ZPRING3 CORE
SUPFLIES,CPERATING
r:
010199
1,050.00
CLARK LANDSCAPING
CCNSTRUCTICN
g
r
010200
60.97
COLUMBIA TRANSIT CORP
RENTAL, ECLIPMENI113
s
•
ti5C}1v
010201
174.00
CONSOLI;A-.E9 ELECTRIC
REPAIRS, UTILITIES
±�
010202
344.00
CONTRAC' CLEAT+IWG
JANITOR SERVICE
r
010203
131.30
COPY OUPLICATIIrG PROD
COPY SUPPLIES
010204
16E.40
Cy* PEIs NEAR
UNIFORMS 4 GLCTFING
__._—`�
010205
804.40
BaIA OPERA?TONS, INC.
CCNT. SVCS., KEY PUNCH
010206
45.69
EL_CTRIC MOTOR SPEC INC
F.CPAIFS, EQUIPMENT
'
010207
?4.75
GALLAGHER SERVICE INC
i
REFUSE CCLLEC71CN
1O
jt
•
01u208
4).00
GENERATOR SPECIALTY CO
FEPAIFS, EQUIFMENT -
■�
-..
010209
9.n3
N K GRAINGER INC
UNIFORMS + CLCThIIG
°
010210
41.82
FTALY LABORATORIES
OTHER FhCFE) IONAlSERy;�
I
<<z
.
010211
23.49
HONELiT�
SUP FLIES, VCHICLE
f `
HO2i2
n!!.T2
TtlCTY-PRINTS
FPINTINC
810213
?1,3..'•1
KOKFSH ATHLETIC
SUPPL1ESJPFRAT INi
CITY OF
MCUi;I;`:
Vit s.
A C
C E
's T '; P A e F L E
CHEC0
A
M O U !1
C L
A I
h A F
010214
010215
010216
010217
010218
`� OL021�3
010220
010221
010222
010223
144-.10
L,639.79
4,234.42
MB UPFLY CO
71ETR0 FONf COMM
ME'RO I,k7E CONTROL CCMM
RICHAP,J MEYER'
HILLER, CAVIS CO
MTNNCSOTA VC FUND
CITY OF MCUNCS VIEW
169.36 CITY OF HOUNDS VIEN
771.57 H M BELL TELEPHONE CO
_ .
72.84 NEW BRIGHTON H.WE
010224 380.62 NEW BRIGHTON HOME
_01F225
010226
'w 010227
_ 010228
i'
010229
O10230
407.40 N00-MERN CANVARY `UFPLY
100.00 CONALO F PAULEY
47.20 P-PSI COLA BOTTLING CO
240.38 GHAC PAGAN INC
48,00 •4NEY COUNTY PTAC
80.32 RAMSEY COUNTY TREASURER
Oi02'U1 108.40 ROAp RUNNER PARCEL SER
010232 120.00 PAMELA S ROSE
FATE 11-09-82 PAfr 3
P U R P 0 S F
SUPPLIES,CPERATI�F sti'I
COMFUN ICATICNS-
TEI cPHCNE
NETRC NASTE CUNT CCMM
GENEPAL LEGAL SE51VICES
AVC-PPOSECUTINS ATTY,;;ERVIC
0L-C-HEP F","73' T'INAL SERV
SUPPLIEc,C17; i1'TN!
UNEN.PLOYMENT POMP
IMF
q.
REFLNCS
ANC -OTHER FPCFES517NAL SERV.
OTHEF PkOFESS1DFAl SElk
COMMUNICA 10,ri:-ii1 i PH6Nt1,L`+. .`
ELPPLIES, CL.6S#6PNOS:'
AND-SUFPLIES, E_CLIPMENT J
AMO-FEF., 2LC(S I GR
AN5-SUPPLIE,,CPEPArI!T"V AN;-SJPPLIEi, UTILITIE$" Y'
ANC-SUFFIIES, VEHICLE
SUPPLIES, ELOCS+GFNOS i
ANG- SUPPLIES, ECLIPMENT '
ANG-SUPPLIES,OPERATINjt'
ANG-SUPPLIES, VEMICLE,
A1:0-0EP., BLDGS + GROUNOS
'LPPLTF: (FFNATINC
"ILEAGE
F E. F
SUPPLIEF, BL=G;fC NCS
_.7
TRAINING
'a
PRINTING
AND-O'HER PROFESSIONAL SERV
Cola. .`.VC:., DELIVERY''�',i,-;
SALARIES,TEMPiPART TI
Sergi
Cf!Y OF MCUPM Vtl 14 r^ r I h P A Y A r L F ^A F 11-o9-82 PAC 4
r Y O(�Uf I
fl,C GrFl(l F L I ES % ?`:".
OW34
I
PPL I f:L 34C 'NOE
TING
PA 1PSj ILT I i IT ES
I h I NC.
A 0 - S U P P L I L S I F I I NG
Ul, I FM V% UllL 14 111 C I 1,(L
u In p i F
tM '4
0. 1 TO(, Ill f. -A L I H
LNIFCkW i Cl. H'
0 to zs$
q. -1 o
v I I Or 0 141 A 1.1 0 1 f il I
UNIFOrPS 4 CLI I W
011234
5 t 0 'q
VIA Ill'!( APIVOW; SAF(Ir
REPAIRS, LTIL71'11-
010240
66,00
Wh L W il I '.* rl OT AL 1-11
RFFUSE COLLCir . I ct.
0111141
60,00
wtltt UISW-AL r'fivffl
REPATFS, LTILITIr
010242
2970A.07
Cl I Y OF Wh IT I JA4 Lli KI
6LAP I ES , Rr --:L AF
Al:D-PFNSlCN!'
TO,
tKC-G9CLF
AND-WORkm rrMFENSAij6
01124,
4 ri A 0 r.
IIP H A h U F A C I U R I N G C 0
:LPFLIHICPFRtTINC
0 1,)244
20,00
Wl: ANOEPSUR
PROGRAM INSTRUCTORS
o It ;M
12.00
LF7LIL 00GG5
PpmAV DSTOUCIORS
010246
I'll, 00
:f AW4 CARLSIPOM
PROGRAh INSTRLCICRS
00247
620,00
JI:ANNE COLLETTI
PROGRAM INSTRUCTORS
QIULd
25, 00
DON nFAN
PROGRAM. IhSTP,LC -C' S
0 U1241
15.00
JAN CURUX
PROGRAM MTRUCTUS
-
7,
715
010250
125. uo
UTH CILLFAN
PROCRAM
366,00
CyNtHj.A P jOHMSON
PPOCRAP. ll'smc 'ps
to. Do
MAIZCUS VAGNUSION
PROGRAM W:TRLC--R.S..-
0 to 21) 3
66. 00
.w. At"r
CITY OF MCUttCc
VIEW
n C r ; P Y A P L E
�A_E 11-E9
8? PACI
5
CHECK* A
M 0 U ":
C L n 1 P A t;
F U P
C s r-
010254
20.00
REGAN FERRY
PPOGPAM
INSTRUCI:".
r
010255
45.00
`AMI REEi
FRCiPAM
IN IHl.lf
s
' a
010256
135.00
-IH STACY
PRCGP,AP
1NSiR i[:'
010257
23.00
CAN WE
PPOGP.AH
010258
125.00
HAERI TOLLEF�C,J
P,OG-AM
IN:i i
610259
139464.01
C4WSOk CONSTRUCTION
OTHE= FRCFESS'CFAL
SEFV
0in260
135.U0
ROBERT ANDRUSS
PROGOAH
I N S I L"TO f
- ---
010261
_-
384.00
KCN IEIM
PROGRAM
16S19l'�f'�'.
I
010262
40.00
JIMEY THEIS
PF.FLNCS
_\
010263
13.45
APRON APPLIANCE
REPAIRS,
EOUIFFEO
010264
69.75
ACTION PLASTIC SALE:
PFINTTNC
u
010265
12,00
RUEY GTRNEF
R E F U
N D
019266
12,00
JESSE JOHNSON
R E FU
N 0
Rug
010267
99.25
DON STREICHEF GUNS INC,
REPAIRS,
FOUIFMENt
'
010268
95.00
SIGNOGFAPHICS
VEHICLESZmi
4
r
010269
5.00
INTL ASSOC OF PLBG AND
BOOKS 4
PERIOOICAIS
' • i!;t
0in270
715.00
A Tucot, CORPORATION
CCNTINC
rY
111211
10.00
NORTH SIAR CONCRETE
RlPni'�S,
Lrt_It1�,
_
o yTt
010272
30,00
DAYS REMODELING
R E F U
N U
010273
40.00
GF RnL': ?[GIN JP
RE Fin ;
b
010274
40.00
;TEVE HALES
kEFILI,:;
Ll
010275
40.00
LOTS LESTINA
F E F L'
N 0
J.
�' ititj
01G276
46.00
MN' DEP7 OF NATURAL
`.L'PFLJES,CPERAtI
i
1.
4I_
0in277
8.00
MICHELE BOEOIGHEIYER
R E F U
N D
1tii
010278
8.00
PDG GLODE.Y.
P E F U
K 0
s F
h(
Ci'Y OF MOUNI: VI 4
n C C C
L N P 7 Y ;. L E
A'E
1I-09-b2
uACF
6
r(
CPFCK*
A M 0 U N T
C L A
I H A N T
P
U
E
P
O S E
6:,1
1
010279
8.00
YVONNE
KUTCHER
R
E
F
'J
N is
IM
010280
5.00
JAN ICE
OL ON
R
E
F
L
N C
r�
�
O10281
4.00
GINGER
PPGAINIS
F
E
F
L
N C
010282
3.00
CHERYL
SCNMIC' ZY.RING
R
E
F
U
N
016283
8.00
SHARON
ZAPPA
R
E
F
L
N L
4
94
38,227.72
CHECKS WFITTEk
'.
TOTAL OF
S01 CHECKS TOTAL
74,395.14
'
t N rya
::3ff
i
�+!
i • ,•��na 1 �" C
4
W
r.
•
y
J:f L-
SM/
ORDINANCE NO. 320
/1 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
f
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE MUNICIPAL CODE
OF MOUNDS VIEW BY AMENDING CHAPTER 26,
ENTITLED "PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS"
The Council of the City of Mounds View does hereby ordain:
SECTION I. Chapter 26.10, Subdivision 2, Adoption; Interest,
is amended as follows:
Subdivision 2. Adoption; Interest. At such
meeting or at any adjournment thereof the Council
shall hear and pass upon all objections to the
proposed assessment, whether presented orally or
in writing. The Council may amend the proposed
assessment as to any parcel and by resolution
adopt the same as the special assessment against
the lands named in the assessment roll. Notice
of any adjournment of the hearing shall be adequate
if the minutes of the meeting so adjourned show
the time and place, when and where the hearing is
to be continued, or if three days notice thereof
be published in the newspaper. The assessment,
with accruing interest, shall be a lien upon .11
private and public property included therein, ._
the date of the resolution adopting the assessment,
concurrent with the general taxes; but the lien
shall not be enforceable against public property
as long as it is publicly owned, and during such
period the assessment shall be recoverable from
the owner of such property only in the manner and
to the extent provided in Chapter 26.16. Except
as provided below, all assessments shall be payable
in equal annual installments extending over such
period, not exceeding thirty years, as the
resolution determines, payable on the first Monday
in January in each year, but the number of install-
ments need not be uniform for all assessments
included in a single assessment roll if a uniform
criterion for determining the number of installments
is provided by the resolution. The first install-
ment of each assessment shall be included in the
first ta:c rolls completed after its adoption and
shall be payable in the same year as the taxes
ORDINANCE NO. 320
r1 Page Two
contained therein; except that t•he payment of
the first installment of any assessment levied
upon unimproved property may be deferred until
a designated future year or until the platting
of the property or the construction of improve-
ments thereon, upon such terms and conditions and
based upon such standards and criteria as may be
provided by resolution of the Council. In any
event, every assessment, the payment of which is
so deferred, when it becomes payable, shall be
divided into a number of installments such that
the last installment thereof will be payable not
more than thirty years after the levy of the
assessment. All assessments shall bear interest at
such rate as the resolution determines, not
exceeding B-per-eent-per-annem the maximum permitted
by law, except that the rate may in any event equal
the average annual interest rate on bonds issued
to finance the improvement for which the assessments
are levied. To the first installment of each
assessment shall be added interest on the entire
assessment from a date specified in the resolution
levying the assessment, not earlier than the date
of the resolution, until December 31 of the year
in which the first installment is payable, and to
each subsequent installment shall be added interest
for one year on all unpaid installments; or,
alternatively, any assessment may be made payable
in equal annual installments including principal
and interest, each in the amount annually required
to pay the principal over such period with interest
at such rate as the resolution determines, not
exceeding the maximum period and rate specified
above. In the latter event, no prepayment shall
be accepted under Subdivision 3 without payment
of all installments due to and including December 31
of the year of prepayment, together with the
original principal amount reduced only by the
amounts of principal included in such installments,
computed on an annual amortization basis. When
payment of an assessment is deferred, as authorized
in this subdivision, interest thereon for the
period of deferment may be made payable annually
at the same times as the principal installments
of the assessment would have been payable if not
deferred; or interest for this period may be added
to the principal amount of the assessment when it
ORDINANCE NO. 320
Page Three
becomes payable; or, if so provided in the
resolution levying the assessment, interest
thereon to December 31 of the year before the
first installment is payable may be forgiven.
SECTION II Chapter 26.05, Subdivision 5, Petition By
All Owners, is amended as follows:
Subdivision 5. Petition By All Owners.
Whenever all owners of real property abutting
upon any street named as the location of any
improvement shall petition the Council to
construct the improvement and to assess the
entire cost against their property, the Council
may, witheab after a public hearing, as provided
in Chapter 8 of the Home Rule Charter, adopt
a resolution determining such facts and ordering
the improvement.
SECTION III This ordinance shall take effect 30 days after
the date of its publication.
Read by the Council of the City of Mounds View on this 25th day
of October , 1982.
Read and passed by the Council of the City of Mounds View this
day of , 1982.
ATTEST:
(SEAL)
Mayor
Clerk -Administrator
ORDINANCE NO. 326
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF MOUNDS
VIEW BY AMENDING CHAPTER 107, ENTITLED "BINGO"
The Council of the City of Mounds View does hereby ordain:
Section I. Chapter 107 of the Municipal Code is hereby
amended to read as follows:
(see attached amendment)
Section II. This ordinance shall take effect 30 days after
the date of its publication.
Read by the Council of the City of Mounds View on the day
of , 1982.
Read and passed by the Council of the City of Mounds View on this
day of , 1982.
ATTEST:
(SEAL)
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney
Mayor
C erk-Adm7nictratnr
CHAPTER 107
BINGO, RAFFLES, AND GAMBLING DEVICES
107.01 Provisions of State Law Ado ted. The provisions of
Minnesota StatutesSection 3 9.11 through 3 49.23 relating to ti
pull -tabs or ticket jars and lotteries are aao�rea ana maue a Nau
of this chapter as if set out in full. In addition the regulations
of this chapter shall apply to the conduct ot bingo and rattles an
the use of such gambling devices within the City.
1e77el 107.02 Permit Required. The game of "bingo", raffles,
and the use of gambling devices, as hereinafter defined, is hereby
declared illegal unless the permit hereinafter provided for is first
obtained and all requirements hereinafter specified are fully
complied with.
107702 107.03 Definitions. Per-the-pnrpeses-e€-this-ehapter
the-game-ubingeu-is-defined-as The following words and terms wherever
they occur in this chapter shall be defined as follows:
(1) Bingo - a popular modern variation of "Keno" or "Lotto",
where each player has a card or board containing five horizontal
rows all but the central one containing five figures, the
central row having four figures with the word "free" marked in
the center thereof; any combination of five in a row whether
horizontal, vertical or otherwise when completed by a player
constitutes "bingo", and the central row either horizontal,
vertical, or otherwise constitutes "bingo" when its four
numbers are announced and covered. A wheel or other mechanical
device may be used by any person conducting the game of "bingo",
and any such person may award either money or merchandise to any
player or players first completing any combination entitling
such player or players to call "bingo".
(2) Gambling Devices - Those gambling devices known as
wheels, tigboards, pull -tabs (or ticket jars) or appara
in conducting raffles.
(3) Paddle.,;ieel - A wheel marked off into sections con
one or more numbers and which, after being turned or sp
uses a Pointer or marker to indicate winning cnances.
107.03
or symbols out of every set of pull -tabs (or ticket jars)
will have been designated in advance and at random as
prizewinners. A participant pays a consideration to an
operator for the opportunity to obtain a folded or banded
ticket or a card, view the numbers or symbols on it, and
possibly obtain a prizewinning pull
-tab or ticket iar number).
(5) Raffle - A game in which a participant buys a ticket
for a chance at a prize with the winner determined by a random
drawing to take place at a location and date printed upon the
Lickct.
(1) Tipboard - A board, placed or other device measuring at
least 12 inches square, marked off in a grid or columns, in
which each section contains a hidden number or numbers, or
other symbol which determines the winning chances.
197:93 107.04 Application. Any religious, charitable,
fraternal or other association not organized for pecuniary profit,
which has been in existence for at least three years, has at least
of Minnesota, desiring to conduct said -game -and -the -playing -thereof
a bingo game or raffle or use gambling devices shall make application
for a permit there€er to the Council.
107:94 107.05 Application Form. The application herein
provided for shabbe in the form specified by the Clerk-Administrat
104 e5 107.06 Verification. The application shall be verified
by a duly authorized officer of the association and also by the
person charged by the association with conducting and supervising
said game; and both such applicants shall be responsible for the
proper conduct and operation of the game and for compliance with the
provisions of all pertinent statutes, ordinances and regulations
of any governmental agency pertaining to the conduct of playing of
said game and the premises upon which the said game is conducted.
iv.;e6 107.07 Permit Fees. The application shall be submitted
together with the permit fees established by resolution of the City
Council for all dates of operation of proposed "binqo" games for a
period of one year to the Clerk -Administrator for presentation to
the Council.
167764 107.08 Information Required. The application shall
state the date or dates and the hours thereof for which permission
to play the game is requested, and the applicant association shall
not conduct said game at any other time than the hours and date
or dates specified in the application.
IRTOB 107.09 Council Action. After presentation of the
application and the fees as herein provided, the Council shall,
in its discretion, either grant or deny the same. 41
107.10
19}709 107.10 Restrictions. No permit shall be issued
allowing the -game a bingo g me or raffle to be conducted or gambling
devices used by the applicant association more than one day a week
on the same premises or for a longer period than four consecutive
hours on any one day within a period of more than one year from
the date the permit is issued.
197710 107.11 Refunds. After an application has been granted,
no refund of the fees hereunder taxed shall be made.
104.11 107.12 Sole Purpose. No such association shall rent,
lease, or occupy any property for the sole purpose of conducting
such game -or bingo game(s) or raffle or using gambling devices.
19}:12 107.13 Persons Conducting. Only members of the
applicant associat on shall be permitted to conduct the game bingo
games or raffle or use gambling devices and no person shall be paid
or given any remuneration for conducting such game bingo game or
raffle or using gambling devices.
194:13 107.14 Change of Officers. If, subsequent to the
issuance of the permit there shall be a change of officers of the
association or of the manager of the game(s), the license conferred
by the permit shall be void until such change or changes shall have
been brought to the attention of, and approved by, the Clerk
Administrator.
107714 107.15 Free Lunches. No free lunches, food or
merchandise shall be offered or given, nor shall other inducements
for game participation be made by anyone.
107-.15 107.16 Revocation. No permittee shall have a vested
right in any permit hereto, and such permit may be revoked in the
event the permittee shall violate or cause to be violated any of
the provisions of this chapter, or of the statutes relating to
ubingeu-games bingo and gambling devices, or of any state law,
ordinance, or regulation pertaining to the conduct of said game
or to the premises on which it shall be conducted, or in the event
the applicant shall be guilty of any misrepresentation in the
application.
197716 107.17 Proceeds. The proceeds arising from the
conducting of "b ni go" games, raffles or operating gambling machines_
shall not inure to the profit of any individual.
19}71} 107.18 Books and Inspection. The permittee association
shall at all times keep proper books an records showing the gross
receipts from the operation of the said games, raffles or machines
and the net receipts thereof to the permittee association, and all
107.18
nrher uertinent matters related to the proceeds of and distribution /�
of receipts €rem -said -game; and the permittee shall at all reasonabi
times permit access by the council and police officers to all such
books and records which shall be kept by the officers of the permittee
for a period of at least one year. In the event of an audit the
permittee shall pay the reasonable expenses of such audit based on
the minimum per diem rates charged by a public accountant or certified
public accountant.
194718 107.19 Penalty. Any person, firm, corporation, or
association guilty of an;, misrepresentation in an application for a
ubingeu permit or otherwise violating or causing to be violated any
provision of this chapter shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. (23, 188)
MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Director of Public Works/Community Development
DATE:• November 2, 1982
SUBJECT: LETTER FROM FIRE CHIEF RON FAGERSTROM CONCERNING
STREET NAMES IN THE SILVER LAKE WOODS ADDITION
Attached is a copy of the letter received from Ron Fagerstrom
dated October 19, 1982, and a copy of the memo from Police Chief
Grabowski dated November 2, 1982, concering the street names and
addresses in the Silver Lake Woods Plat. Staff has reviewed the
situation and determined that in order to change the street names,
as requested by Mr. Fagerstrom, it would require an ordinance revi-
sion. It does not appear that an ordinance revision and street name
change would be necessary if the house numbers, as originally pro-
posed along Park View Terrace and Drive, be changed so that duplicate
addresses do not occur. It is further noted that there will be no
buildings with addresses on Silver View Drive up near Trunk highway
10, therefore, the concern expressed by Mr. Fagerstrom appears to
have been resolved.
Staff, therefore, recommends to the City Council that instead of
changing the street names as requested by Mr. Fagerstrom that we
modify the building addresses. The suggested building address modifi-
cation is shown on the attached sketch of the Silver View area.
If you have any questions, please contact me.
JCJ/bc
Attachment
cc; Don Paulay
Frank Kampel
TO: Mayor, City Council, and
Clerk -Administrator
FROM: Police Chief
DATE: November 2, 1982
RE: Silver Lake Woods Addition
I do agree with Chief Fagerstrom's letter dated October 19, 1982.
I do feel that Park View Terrace and Park View Drive will cause a
lot of confusion for the Police Department and Fire Department with
identir31 house numbers.
I would recommend that either the numbering system be changed or one
of the street names.
copy to Frank
HEADQUARTERS
1810 Highway 10
Spring Lake Park, Minnesota 55432
October 19, 1982
City of Mounds View
2401 Highway 10
St. Paul, Minnesota 55112
Rr: Silver Lake Woods Addition
Attention: Donald Pauley
Dear Don:
I have just recently been apprised of the street name changes for this
addition. In the interest of public safety, Park View Terrace and
Silver View Drive should be renamed,
Silver View Drive is, as laid out, a continuation of Take Court Drive
and should be so named,
Park View Terrace begins and ends at Park View Drive, Further, there
are identical house numbers on both Park View Terrace and Park View
Drive, It has been our experience that identical names with the
exception of a different suffix can lead to confusion.
In the interest of safety, I am requesting that these two street name
changes be made.
Yours very truly,
C�n
agern rsom
Chief of Department
RF/js
e 4
J its l tl n
'15
1 '1
6
_1J t
BRDiKDR + � .pA�
DRIVE I MSI
__1 P
� 1 t
tI\
PA N
G
"� At:138
1 '137
r I
a A o = 1
IL it r 73�
lYw r' __Yit
i k 6,
hvni
b
.J(f as''yjV�7ti�,t
7 i wli�
( 41
If$ ^ 735
t;
I ,
1 lass
,
I
TYPIC AL LOf, A0IIIMj nllaad M III Nn
luutlulqu .Iabl lllu A.I e....
As,.n11 moult.
CRAMAGE AND UTILirr
EASEMENTS
ht,�TJod. A-11v— M I t. = I,
• C
Bede to lnl,n..OM en a Oalelnme
_� —1
"Ins Onn one 911r1 In ndM,
JI 7
Ynletl Ma1/In1 Ih..d,.nd Oal11n•
I r,71
a
I
01 IM.n In I1I Jbt
Im
q¢I
F.SI-AT.T.,
S
0 Den"'"
irOn maNmMl t0wnd
O Denaftt 1/2.nen nr la rota .ea, mmwmnl
I" ALL Potban n
the follovlM brr
brtheast Harter 710.1 (up thanci Mon
Native of the NortMast Harter, 367.26 1
bat line 96.11 feat Mean frm the paint
bgIMLn9.
Ned M C C Mnalty Co...a lUwmta CPrporatlonl amor 9f IM
City Of lbund. view. Pnsoy, County. MIIIMwIn
M.v1 uuanndt the Assoc to be Wrvry d. Plotted. mJ
Wbile (or Nblle uso foreval thn Oche.. Lane. as,
tM plat. Mraus - andnsm, Ift-rPOnted.. Mime
As, Its pr,rper officer, and it. e.,&t..cal to at
and M b t Malty Co., A Manassas Corporation. An
and It. eorpormc seal to bs hereunto Ifflvd this
SICMr01 OAUS Mnptsgl, IMCp1PCMn'n
Lloyd Mgrlw It. Prold,de
State Of MiMnaota
County of
to fOreeoln9 le.tn , vs. Rknonle,, ed before
A' Lloyd fnmlana, he.ldent Of Praus • MMnm,
Corporation.
-,at, of NlnMsots
County or
Thr f0rrn01110 Instrlw.nf vat olinwled,IM INfore r All
by Co~ N.D. Mlnar, haldem and M Lloyd mnrins,
Cerponuan, on Mh.lf of the Corporation.
f. Calvin M. llydlmd, h.mby certify that I have survryM
dafln'im of this plat a SILM L,,, h.MM i that this I
that tl] nlstenc•r or. n...ttly sham on Or plats that 1
mound P: sham; that thn outside bodttyllne. are eorrei
.ere bnda, f 11,11 or m
Nblir hi0:ways other than As shone
Hato Of Ml Mrsot.
eoanty of u.Meptn
The Stly is c•rtiffr.tr was nuhlrribA and sworn to
IPPrm d and "COMM by the Clty rameil of the City of
19b_•
so
NO MllnVOnt tares and transfer tour" this�dry of�
nirnctor • M
dpn".ent of Ptoperty Tsnrtlm
Pur.unt to Chapter a, Minnesota Laws of 1976. this plat no,
dry of . 196_and th. condition. Of MlMlaota
haw. ben fulfilled.
C"nly Pfcorerr, C'Nnty Of Pan"y. state of IUnfamota
I crafty efrllly that J.I. plat cf dIL9T . I wmm ...
1)6_, at _o'.1OC1—M, nd ... !Ilea 1n M00%_of hats,
n
1 �-
/ 1 �(�VOU 3Ar� 1M01
/ ",AIm nfrutl/-0YON 3YIl W1019
u tt/
N •f ri d (� ' r
l
,iJid'"nrr, +'rr tt 'rp
N t
/ hffa,xr•, r •'
ft
i/ 111•,_.-ot-,-rp,/7..� yr d{e/4 9.
� I' // /` N /' /fir �r(4. +� rr/� �w y1.p ��• 1',,
/ / E r •r. rr ♦ I�
yy'
L'
n�'P 4, l�� I P••.: -. trl{ ♦ SI n r+ ya � / • xtl; �. , Y
� y rl00%' q I ♦r m
�
u.. It
^> �,�...pl
%..y ; +
RI rr + tY� `n%� 11•I v
Itul,u �' •yet,.3
_ ..0:1 1rilll I / utp0. hAr•`- I; " .y rn ,,,�h, \\
41
us
O io� you 8 I A'
IF
J
a
1
W �
/ E
, imey g e _q a
n _ i S n • O
Ca
° ° A I 'm • �g ° S'` `
DF 011 ear. •" - e 1` ° T
Y I V
"'� � A I � a l
i -41
n
!• =W
K �IQIiE 8 a I s i p s' i ` i C i
jw 16,6
MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Director of Public Works/Community Development
DATE: November 2, 1982
SUBJECT:* STATUS REPORT ON WATER TREATMENT STUDY
At the October 25, 1982 Council meeting it was requested that data
be presented as to the current water usage and status of the treat-
ment study be presented at the November 1st Council meeting. This
memo summarizes the discussion presented to the City Council on
November 1st.
Two graphs were handed out at the Council meeting which illustrated
the historical water production for the City of Mounds View on (1)
an annual water production basis; and (2) a monthly water production
basis. The annual water production basis also illustrated the
projected water production as estimated in the Consulting Engineer's
Diversified Report prepared in the late 1970's. It was apparent
from the data that our water production rates have been increasing
but appear to be increasing at a rate lower than forcast in 1978 by
C.E.D. Review of the C.E.D. commants in their report indicate that
certain things would be necessary as production levels grew in the
City of Mounds View. It appears that the City of Mounds View water
production rates may be reaching that point when upgrading and/or
expansion of the water system should be seriously considered and
phasing in of those proposed improvement be thoroughly discussed.
Layne Minnesota was contacted to determine the costs of servicing
the air injection equipment on our existing water treatment plants.
That firm did the original installation work and currently represents
the manufacturer of the air injection equipment. It was determined
that to replace the equipment would cost an estimated $75 to $100 with
a labor cost of $74 per hour with an estimated 4 to 6 hours to com-
plete the work. Staff recommends the City Council authorize retain-
ing Layne Minnesota to service the air injection equipment at Well #6
on a time and materials basis not to exceed $700. It is recommended
that the funds be utilized from contractual repairs in the 1982 budget.
It is further recommended that the water maintenance personnel observe
the repair work necessary at Well #6 and then implement, using their
own manpower and equipment, the servicing of the air injection equip-
ment at Well #5 during the time the well is being serviced under a
proposed contract to be submitted to the Council for their consideration
later this month, naScd on the experiences obtained at Weiis #5 and
#6, it is hoped that the City water maintenance personnel could then
provide the necessary maintenance activities at Well #1 for the air
injection equipment.
The water sampling work has progressed and it is anticipated that a
preliminary report might be available at the November 15th Agenda
meeting. Preliminary evaluation and findings indicate that the exist-
Mayor and City Council
Page 2
November 2, 1982
my filter equipment does little, if any, manganese removal in the
well water existing in Mounds View. It has therefore been concluded
that modification of the filter process may be necessary to affect
improved,manganese removal. Modifications may include changing of
the well water pil, insertion of additional chemicals to improve the
oxidation of the water prior to filtration or modification of the
filter material in the filter tanks to improve manganese removal.
It is anticipated that more information, and hopefully more detailed
information, will be available for discussion as mentioned at the
November 15th meeting.
It was also determined in conversations with Layne Minnesota that the
firm would be pleased to inspect the interior filter media in our
filter equipment for free. The City could be responsible for supply-
ing new gaskets for the inspection ports on the filters. It is there-
fore anticipated that during the servicing of Well #5 we will contact
Layne Minnesota and ask them to inspect the filter media per their
offer.
If you have any questions, please contact me.
JCJ/bc
cc: Don Pauley
Gary Kardell
i
J
i0 (!"
t MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Director of Public Works/Community Development
DATE: November 2, 1982
SUBJECT: STATUS REPORT ON STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
At the Council meeting on November 1, 1982, a copy of the progress
schedule was furnished to the City Council. This memo is to confirm
information furnished to the City Council at that meeting.
The schedule identified the days for the necessary work elements as
presented in my memo of September 22, 1982 relating to the storm
water management plan preparation. This schedule also indicates
the time length necessary to be followeed in order to complete the
schedule and study by early December. As can be noted on the sched-
ule, through October 30, 1982, progress has fallen behind the anti-
cipated time line. It is still my opinion that progress and the
study can be completed within November with a concerted effort on my
part.
It should also be noted that the storm water management plan objec-
tives were understood by myself to be as follows:
1) Estimate and quantify storm water runoff;
2) evaluate capacity of the existing system;
3) identify portions of the system that:
a) are at capacity or over capacity;
b) will be at capacity upon future development;
c) need improvement or relief;
4) update as necessary the provisions of Resolution No. 983;
5) identify areas that need protection and/or preservation from
development;
b) be utiiized as an administrative tool to evaluate planning
applications;
7) identify possible future public improvements to the system;
and
8) evaluate and/or identify needed maintenance activities.
After discussion with the Council it was concluded that two areas
were intended to be covered and/or protected by ordinance actions
and these relate to (1) implementation of erosion control procedures
Mayor and City Council
Page 2
November 2, 1982
to be utilized on all parcels within the community and (2) protec-
tion of existing drainagcways and provision for protection of
future required drainageways.
It was suggested at the meeting on November 1st that a Wetlands Sub-
committee meeting be scheduled the week of November 15th, the purpose
of which is to discuss those things that we wish to develop into
ordinance form and begin the ordinance preparation process. It was
further suggested that a second Wetlands Subcommittee meeting might
be scheduled for November 29th, the fifth Monday of November.
If the items discussed above need additional clarification, please
contact me.
JCJ/bc
cc: Don Pauley
CITY OP MOUNDS VIEW
C]Tv COUNCIL
Agenda Session
^lovcmber 15, 1982
7:00 p.m.
1. I & I Presentation, by representatives of TKDA, 7:30 p.m.
2. Consideration of 1983 Sewer & Water Budgets & Rate.
3. Discussion of Northwest Suburban Youth Service Bureau (material
provided in 11-1-82 packet).
9. Discussion of street names in Silver Lake Woods Addition (material
provided 11-8-82 packet, Item 10A).
5. Consideration of Apnlication for Restaurant License and transfer
of On -Sale Liquor License from Richard & Marlene Povlitzki to
James A. Loosen.
6. Consideration of staff r!emorandum regarding tax forfeited land.
7. Consideration of proposals for auditing services and staff memo-
randum.
8. Discussion of staff memorandum regarding Lift Station 13 Report.
9. Discussion of staff memorandum ragardinq Water Meter Study.
10. Status of. Treatment Study by representatives of TKDA.
11. Discussion of staff memorandum regarding vehicle sales at Northeast
Marine,
12. Discussion of staff memorandum regarding Knollwood Green Condominium
Proposal.
MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Director of Public Works/Community Development
DATE: November 10, 1982
SUBJECT: FINAL REPORT ON INFILTRATION/INFLOW STUDY
Attached is a copy of the T.K.D.A. report on the Infiltration/Inflow
Study. Mr. Ed Smith of T.K.D.A. will make a presentation to the City
Council at 7:30 p.m. on November 15, 1982.
Staff would suggest the City Council review the following key
sections of the report:
1) Figure 3, Page 2-11 (Map of Sewer System)
2) Table 12, Page 3-17; Table 14, page 3-21
3) Table 16, Page 3-29; Table 17, Page 3-30
4) Page 3-32; Table 19, Page 3-34
5) Section 4, Cost -Effectiveness Analysis, Pages 4-1 through 4-17
6) Section 5, Conclusions and Recommendations, Pages 5-1
through 5-2
Staff recommends that the City Council be prepared to discuss whether
a modified sewer evaluation study and/or survey is warranted in 1983.
If study is warranted, should the cost be included in sewer budget.
If you have any questions, please contact me.
JCJ/bc
Attachment
VasK, k_%)
MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council
i�FROM: Clerk -Administrator
DATE: November 9, 1982
SUBJECT: APPLICATION FOR TRANSFER OF ON -SALE LIQUOR AND RESTAURANT
LICENSES FROM RICHARD AND MARLENE POVLITZKI TO JAMES A. LOOSEN
Attached please find applications and other information submitted by
Mr. James A. Loosen for a restaurant license and the transfer of the
on -sale liquor license for povlitzki's on 10 from Richard and Marlene
Povlitzki to himself. Along with this information, Mr. Loosen submitted
the appropriate fees for the transfer of the liquor license and a
restaurant license, as well as documents relating to the Purchase
Agreement between himself and D & M Investments, Inc., and retainers
for liquor liability insurance and bonds.
The aforementioned material has been reviewed by City staff and the
City Attorney and has been found to be in compliance with the require-
ments of the City.
Also attached is a repert from the City's Police Department outlining
an investigation conducted by the Department relating to the operation
of the Uptown Bar & Cafe in which Mr. Loosen is the majority stock-
holder.
Upon your review of this material, staff would appreciate direction
as to your desires for further investigation of this matter and/or
the placement of this matter on your next Council meeting agenda.
DFP/pf
Attachments
City of Moundsview
Attention: Mr. Don Paului
Dear Mr. Paului:
Attached are the documents we discussed relevant to my application
for receiving approval of transfer of liquor licenses for Povlitzkis.
1) General license application/check enclosed
2) Application for On Sale Liquor License/check enclosed
3) Personal history
4) Personal references
5) Information concerning my present liquor establishment, Uptown
Bar, in Minneapolis.
6) Insurance company comnittment to furnish bond and insurance.
If any additional data is required, please let me know and I will
do whatever is possible. Also, if a personal interview would be
helpful, I am available at any time, either for a formal meeting
or just informally for coffee.
,Si nferely,
I-a"'a a 4Lti
JPmes A. Loosen
i
JAL/avl
Enclosures
n
9
I
n,il.0 of application_/ y
PR rJn»tY �0,.VL)rve/'1 oN rcN 4-- ---_99
141SINESS NAMENe To.,r3f_, pCrc.:,+iil/"$110m.;
DUSINI:^;i ADDRESS1 2.S OA-4•at y — L JL� �--^- -
(strout)
LVAIzlra CI sc - S"S3
(.ip code
OWNERS/I:ORI'ORA'Pli Ort'ICIiIIS/ASSOCIA'I'LiS/PARTNl•:1tS (name S Litle)
t.L
IIAVE YOU IiVlik HAD A LICL'NSE REVOKED?—
No 1C yes, attach explanation.
TYPO OF LiCL••NSE
/N&
RE'PERENCES: CITII7S WIIERIi PREVIOUSLY OR CURRE TLY LICENSED FOR SAME
ACT1V1'I'Y huone of CiLy and ycar(s) licensed)
...(�. .. ,/ll luV fAfsLl1 AM C,. RJtr✓,'L L
Fz
�Pac..d (3/4 4ParC Ste,
LOCATION FOIL 11111('II l,ll'RWSE lti III:QIJI5'l'RD (if applicable) qT�"i TrT
� s
OW)Ililt OF I'111:M1SI.5 (il' applicabl,:)
2-j:u2 -e- E4ATIaP .._— I-,ct /?e aC.tJr•� _l P•kNr�i-
- - �--- ---- --- -
AppJicants for the following licrnse must: completo the applic,ible section
on the rvversu side of this form:
:nnusrmunt devices/bingo/bowlinq d1lcys/dance halls/ garbage
coJlrctirni/q;/,;nline sLnL•ions/kennels/prddlers/solicitors/
restaurants.
1 heruby certify that information providrd on this application is true
and currect and undeastand that any misrepresentation made heruin may
he grounds for dunia.l of Lhis applieation.
Applicant's name ] µ eS A . Loe, Se n/ Date of birth 71,17130
(I�.11:ase orID4 -
Applicant's signatures
Date of. Council approval- Licensc number
Nuw Renewal
AMu::hrN;N'I' nEVIr:Ha n11LY: '
Nuud:ct' of piub;:lI minchittes VrD[v�.r ,u P+rvr�rE1_iNTrcrP�7rD
Number of general machines---/J—. c,'.-L r--S
IIINGO ONLY:
Number of d:ryn to bo conducted----._.....H'tT 4L,re((A 60
Days) of week- ------ - _— At what hours—
OI ricer of A:r;uci;Itjon_(si.quaturo)
Individual supervisinq g;une:; (sicpu7Lurc) —
BOWLING AI,LI•;1'S ONLY:
Nukor of lanes—`--.-h'_. APr'l-«A&e-
DANCE HALLS ONLY:
11o':i long in operation at given address ,llr- 'IPPL'(A11LE
GARBAGE COLLECTION ONLY:
Equipment to be used Nc- AI'P'10 RG
Place & manner in which garbage will be disposed
Attach map indicating customers served in Hounds View or list thereof,
GASOLINE STATIONS ONLY:
Number of pump:;_ /L'c'r 4PPI eA13L
Number & capacity of gasoline storage tanks
KENN1iL:I ONLY:
Number ul dogs---- �f T n ML(A /3 LC
I'IiDDI,ERS/SOLICl'1'ORS/'I'RANSIIiNT MERCHANTS ONLY:
Type of business /product/service/charity_Ale, % AP"iue-I441-�
Proposed Mounds View location of activity
Proposed duration of license
RESTAURANTS ONLY:
Orcnpancy load Num;)rr hours open per day
a
FOR STAFF U.:E ONLY:
Date application received Fee $ Receipt No.
kEFF,RENC'E CHECK: BETTER DUSINESS BUREAU CHECK:
I9)LICfi
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
BCA-04-045 (8-1-76)
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
APPLICATION FOR ON -SALE INTOXICATING LIQUOR LICENSE
This form was prepared by the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Ap-
prehension, Department of Public Safety, pursuant to Minnesota
Statutes, 1916. Section 340.13, for purposes of background in-
vestigation. It does not supercede any laws, rules or regula-
tions of the Division of Liquor Control regarding the issuance
of liquor licenses. Failure to provide information requested
may result in denial of the application.
N IU
Dg,,fc,+;I� P,J�rrzar.t p{
t✓ /JA/K IJlrw [eMilJlRo,1 f7✓ l�"�
trade name date ot application
Spin. P ,r-,eL 12- r fL ' w'r'L
L-Y P.,i.�Trc a
tensing period' phone, business
1. Type of Application: New Renewal ® Transfer
2. c A_4cs A. Loascfy 475 y G° 70
name of applicant phone, home
3. 22,5 4rr0.4 u16
ome a ress
4. Z7 3u
ate o i rt i
5.
GFI w_1 TEN
ss loc
L✓A j Z ,ATJl
city state
sS3
fib{ jP L•S A4 r//u
place of birth
Vi<W JAIN// SS,N
6. legal description See P,AGIa$r- PI
ENet eSeN Henn wriN F,2 L beSc-A, 0ii�.,
7. Sunday liquor sales: yes_t no Seating capacity:
8. List owners of building or premise to be licensed:
,,A's A L,,,,c,.., C2 jAres 4 AP/
RLt.//e_ U /., do,/
9. C01ZP:1zk7`,,'W `�`"� -ru _{3 rr.�.2�^-��
corporate or partnership tit e
u, try., 7 t vrr
corporate or partnership address /
10. List all partners, officers or directors, if corporation:
name address date of birth
<TAXCS A If L.,iQ,/ Zz5 2-7Ile
e� /. S, 7 3L
err rL /3 e Tn'? x
T
11. If this is a transfer application give name, address, of persons, partnership or.
corporation holding license for the past year.
P
o t/ L t l z k l S O N l G d t. �i..h /) •y
/ C `
17�r'rc ,,,,n wl.rRL.,,q P,vc�r2kr\/\
12. Who owns the
tavern
fixtures? Z�
A O& P r10 S1„[
4 «—
E'4vlpwei•i
F}•FTvne3�
�,,n✓rs►ltr�sf'
13. What vending or mechanical amusement device company has or will have machines on
the licensed premise?
w-e yr re eh . ,t v-- 1, AS r- F. 2 7RL< 4 /L, J o.,� 7v
�rP 77ti (?PSrtNj M.10 ;L%S . 774y .tJLa ua,ieA
/d )L.k CARTCJt C-M04P •,
14. Are you a Minnesota resident? ® Yes No /yt.srw t o a r FL _
rf om to
If not, where resident:
dates of residency
W
15. Have you ever been convicted of violating Federal, State or Local liquor laws
and/or regulations? 11 Yes 9 No
If yes explain fully on separate sheet of paper.
16. Applicant, and his associates in this application, will strictly comply with all
the Laws of the State of Minnesota governing the taxation and the sale of intox-
icating liquor; rules and regulations promulgated by the Liquor Contra] Commis-
sioner; and all ordinances of the municipality; and I hereby certify that I have
read the foregoing questions and that the answers to said questions are true of
my own knowledge. I further understand that an investigation fee not to exceed
$500.00 shall be charged an applicant by the city or county if the investigation
is conducted within the state, or the cost not to exceed $10,000.00 if the inves-
tigation is required outside the state. - n'
Si ature of Applicant
Subscribed and sworn to before me this
_L day of N ; : 19
notary public
My commission expires
CAL E V. NAUIi^AiN �.
1�1] NUTALiY PUo.:C • St tJ�:FSUT.::. _ . _ .. _._... _.
0 ANNA CUUNly
My Cnmmistcn Dgireo Atcy i:, L•'3' ;•
rrrrrrrrvrrl �n u,.:r,tiv:\ ., r,R
W
JAMES A. LOOSEN
1100~ PERSONAL HISTORY
Date of birth: September 27, 1930
Education: 1948 - Graduated St. Thomas Academy
1952 - Graduated University of Minnesota
Bachelor of Science
Misc.- Law and management courses at St.
Thomas College and William and Mary
College
Military service: 1952-1954
United States Air Force -First Lieutenant
Business history: 1955-1982
President
Loosen Inc.
Engaged primarily as Mechanical Contractor
doing plumbing, heating, ventilation work
on public buildings.
Licensed Master Plumbing Contractor
Licensed Master Heating Contractor
First President of Twin City Piping Industry
Association of Twin City area mechanical con-
tracting firms.
Also involved in public investments, consult-
ing for other contractors, real estate owner-
ship, and some investment/management of close
ly held companies.
Residences: 1930-1942
512 West 31st Street
Minneapolis, Minnesota
1942-1951
3217 Garfield Avenue South
Minneapolis, Minnesota
1952-1982
Long Lake, Minnesota
mostly at 225 Lindawood Lane
Family: Father deceased
Mother resides in Long Lake, Minnesota
No brothers/sisters
Married 1951-1982 - Wife Arlene Strand Loosen
James A. Loosen
Personal history
-2-
Children:
James, Jr.
(30)
Gig Harbor, Washington
Joanne
(28)
Tacoma, Washington
Janet
(26)
Minneapolis, Minnesota
Laura (Finazzo)
(25)
Redding, California
Arthur
(17)
Long Lake, Minnesota
Criminal history: None
1
� -4
j
JAMES A. LOOSEN - BUSINESS/PERSONAL REFERENCES
Gerald L. Egan
President
Egan Companies
7100 Medicine Lake Road
Mirncapolis, MN 55421
Phone: 544-4131
Joseph McDowell
Creative Supervisor
Campbell Mithun Company
Northstar Center
Minneapolis, MN 55402
Phone: 347-1643
Robert E. Moore
Formerly President
5229 Duncraig Road
Edina, MN 55436
Phone: 929-7864
Coca Cola Company of Minnesota
Vernon Kotula
President
Apollo Piping Supply Company
2750 Ranchview Lane North
P.O. Box 9470
Minneapolis, MN 55440
Phone: 559-1200
Litton Field, Sr.
President
T. C. Field & Co.
540 North Robert
P.O. Box 43016
Saint Paul, MN 55164
Phone: 227-8405
Robert Schumacher
Municipal Court Judge
6625 Lynwood Boulevard
Minneapolis, KI 55423
Phone: 348-8441
George Kertesz
General USAF Retired
c/o Schebler Company
3810 West River Drive
Davenport, Iowa
Phone: 319-322-1701
ii�'vheL: %Gl�✓N�l.Gw1��
v
JAMES A. LOOSEN - ASSOCIATION WITH UPTOWN BAR MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA
Uptown Bar & Cafe
3018 Hennepin Avenue South
Minneapolis, Minnesota
Telephone 823-5704
Purchased October 1, 1981 from a Minnesota Corporation, Uptown Bar & Cafe, Inc.,
owned by Mr. Frank Toonen for many years. Mr. Toonen resides at 5125 Tifton
Drive, Edina, Minnesota 55435 and his home phone is 944-6632
Purchase included business, real estate, furnishings, equipment and inventory.
The Uptown is licensed for and operates as a place of public onsale liquor/wine/
beer and offsale beer. It serves full meals and snacks from 11:00-2:00 and
5:00-9:00 weekdays and from 10:00-1:00 on weekends. Live music is provided
nightly from 9:00-1:00 a.m. as well as dancing.
I and my wife are involved as majority owners and my duties are limited to
overseeing maintenance and care of the building, and occasional handling of
finances if or when my partner is ill or on vacation.
My partner, Ray Colihan, and his wife are minority owners. Ray serves as
General Manager and is on the premises much of the time it is open. Neither
Mrs. Loosen or Mrs. Colihan is active in the operation of the Uptown Bar.
The authorities involved in the license approval and inspection of the Uptown
Bar are Lt. Shilz of the Minneapolis Police Department and Lt. Montgomery.
J
TO: Mayor, City Council, and
Clerk -Administrator
FROM: Police Department
DATE: November 8, 1982
RE: Liquor License
In checking on the background of Mr. Loosen, I checked with four
Departments within the Minneapolis Police Department:
1) Liquor Licensing Department
2) Minneapolis Criminal Records
3) Minneapolis Narcotics Division
4) Organized Crime Division
1) LIQUOR LICENSING DEPARTMENT phone 348-2871
i tal•ed to Lt. Montgomery, Minneapolis Police Department. Lt.
Montgome:y did the background license approval and inspection of the
Uptown Bar and Cafe. He informed me that the Uptown Dar and Cafe is
owned by LOCO Enterprise Inc. formed 8-26-81. fie stated that James A.
Loosen is the President of the Corporation owning 66,000 shares in the
stock. Ray Calihan is listed as the Vice President owning 34,000 shares
of stock. They list James Loosen as owning a construction business.
The City of Minneapolis approved a class A license meaning that live
music, is approved within the bar. Lt. Montgomery, stated that no
complaints have been filed against the Uptown Bar and Cafe since
LOCO Enterprise Inc. took over ownership.
2) MINNEAPOLIS CRIMINAL RECORDS phone 348-2808
Criminal record checks were ran on James A. Loosen, DOB 9-27-30 and
Arlene V. Loosen, DOD 8-31-32. Clerk Gilmore, Minneapolis Police Dept.
did record checks on both Loosens'. He stated that neither party had any
record.
pg 2 RE: Liquor license continued;
3) MINNEAPOLIS NARCOTICS DIVISION phone 348-3455
I checked with I.hc Minneapolis Narcotics Division to see if the
Uptown Bar and Cafe had a reputation for drug trafficing. I talked
to Lt. Fisher from the Narcotic Squad, he stated, that the Uptown
Bar and Cafe is (a standup bar with local clientele. He stated, that
no enforcement action is in progress at this time. He stated, that
there is normal drug traffic, that may be going on between clientele.
He stated, that there is no knowledge of the owners being involved.
4) MINNEAPOLIS ORGANIZED CRIME DIVISION phone 348-4856
I checked on any organized criminal activities regarding the
Uptown Dar and Cafe and James A. Loosen. Personnel in the division
informed me that they had no information or rumors of any criminal
activities regarding the above.
11-8-82
At approximately 11:00 AM, I drove down to the area of the Uptown
Bar and Cafe. I found that the Uptown Bar and Cafe was located on
the West side of Hennepin between Lake Street and West 31st Street.
Die area appears to be all commercial. The 3000 block of Hennepin
Ave. is made up of small businesses. On the North side of the Uptown
Bar and Cafe is a childrens shop called "City Kids " and on the South
side is the Suburban World Theater.
I talked to three local business people, Teresa Stein, works for City
Kids clothing store. She stated she doesn't know of any trouble the
Bar has caused her store or the area. Her only convent, derogatory,
was the fart of broken beer bottles on the sidewalks at times. I talked
to a Bel Castillo, Manager of the Hennepin Ave. Mobil Station, 31st
Street and Hennepin Ave. He stated .that the nightime patrons of the
Uptown Bar and Cafe use his station lot after he closes. THe patrons
have his approval to park there and he stated that he has had no
problems with the Bar or patrons. I then stopped by Morris and Chi
Food Market. This is located on Hennepin and 31st Street. THe Food
Market is opened up the latest as a retail store in the area. I met with
the owner Chris Muzet., He stated that he was on the Merchants Association
X
pg 3 U : Liquor License continued:
for the area. Mr. Muzetras said, he had no complaints about the Oar
since the new owners took over, Toonen and Colihan. He stated the
clientel is basically local people during the day, this included
business people. At nights they have rock music and the age group
is younger. lie likes the place and eats lunch there himself.
This Officer stopped inside the Uptown Dar and Cafe for lunch
between 12:00 and 12:30 PM. I found the inside to be clean and neat.
The lunch crowd was mostly made up of male and female business people.
They appeared to be very busy.
�126 Corp. David L. Brick
MEMO TO: Mayor and City Counc'
' ^ FROM: Clerk-Administrato
DATE: November 9, 1982
SUBJECT: TAX FORFEITED LAND
Attached please find a letter from the Ramsey County Land Commissioner
indicating that the south one half of Lot 8, Block 1 of the Greenfield
Addition has gone tax forfeit and that said land may be claimed by
the City of Mounds View for public purposes, or if the City desires
to resell such property it may do so upon payment of the appraised
value of that property to Ramsey County.
Also attached for your information is a map indicating the location
of this property. It would appear that this property would serve no
useful purpose for the City of Mounds View and that the expense related
to our purchasing the land from Ramsey County for resale would be more
than what we might potentially receive from its resale. Staff would
recommend that the City advise the Land Commissioner that we are not
interested in claiming this property.
DFP/pf
Attachments
OFFICE OF THE LAND COMMISSIONER
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
109 Court House C
ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA ..cidcD
55102 (i,iy GP
ANTHONY J. REITER. Commlrfloner
November 4, 1982
CERTIFIED MAIL
Duane McCarty, Mayor
City of Mounds View
2401 Highway 10
Mounds View, !N 55112
Dear Sir:
�50';t<DS VI i�87
Attached hereto is a list of lands which forfeited to the State of Minne-
sota on August 6, 1982, for non-payment of real estate taxes. Said lands
have been declared as non -conservation lands by Resolution No. 82-854 of
the Ramsey County Board of Commissioners dated November 1, 1982, a copy
being enclosed.
Approval of local government of the classification and sale of tax forf-
eited lands is required by law.
Attached is a sheet of general information and a suggested Resolution
Form for submission to your City Council.
When Council action has been taken, please return a certified copy of the
resolution to the Office of the Land Commissioner, Room 109, Court House,
St, Paul, Y.iruiesoca 55102.
GEE/kt
Attach.
j cc: Donald Pauley, Clerk
Yours very truly,
J. REITER
1
..V4-49
Resolution
Board of
J?arnsey County Commissioners
Presented By Commissioncr Finley Date November 1, 1982 No. 82-854
Attention:
Budget 6 Accounting; T. Reiter, Land Commissioner;
{,ou McKenna, Taxation 6 Records;
WHEREAS, MSA Section 282 provides that forfeited lands be classified as
conservation or non -conservation and that the classification be submitted to
the governing body of the governmental subdivision in which the parcels lie
for approval of the classification and sale thereof; and
WHEREAS, The Land Commissioner has prepared a list dated November 1, 1982,
of parcels which forfeited for non-payment of taxes and recommends that said
parcels be classified as non -conservation lands; Now, Therefore, Be It
RESOLVED, That the Board of Ramsey County Commissioners hereby recommends
that the parcels of forfeited land as shown on said list be and hereby are
classified as non -conservation lands; and, Be It Further
RESOLVED, That the classification be submitted to the governing body of
the subdivision wherein the parcels lie for approval of the classification
and sale of the lands involved.
ROBERT J. ORTH, ChaiAman
- lem, 1�0; 4 jelwa'(2'!
Chie'f CeeAk- County BoaAd
+n Page i of 1
CLASSIFICATION LIST
November 4, 1982
OFFICE OF THE LAND COMMISSIONER
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
109 Court House
ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA
55102
ANTHONY J. REITER, Commissionor
To the Clerks:
Subject: CLnssificatlull of Tax Forfeited Lands and Related flatters
The Classifivatiun of tax fnrfcitod lands Is governed by Minnesota
Statutes ClcapCer 282.01, which reads in part:
"All parcels of ]and becoming the property of the state in trust under
the provisions of any law now existing or hereafter enacted declaring
the forfeiture of lands to the state for taxes, shall be classified by
the county board of the county wherein such parcels lie as conservation
or non -conservation,"
As Ramsey County is basically urban, forfeited lands usually lie in
developed areas and are classified ns non -conservation lands by the
County Board. Such classification is subject to thu approval of the
local governing body.
After classification by the county board, lists of forfeitures are nrn-
scnted to the political subdivision wherein the land!: lie, for approval
of the classifiration. The local governing body then determines whether
such lands should be acquired for a public purpose or give approval of
sale.
if the lands are to be acquired for public purposes, vour attorney will
ndvisc you about the procedure for applying for it deed, or you can call
this office. Attached is it copy of County Board Resolution No. 80-485
dated Play 19, 1980, which states that local governmental subdivisions
shall pay an appraisal value for conveyance of tax forfeited lands which
are to be used for re -sale purposes. If it is determined said lands are '
to be acquired for re -sale purposes, please contact us so that appraised
values may be set.
Following is the policy of maintenance of such forfeited lands:
Costs incurred by local government for removal of buildings, trees, weeds
or debris should be certified to the county auditor for collection.
When the tax forfeited land is sold, such charges may then be recovered
as other charges for local improvements in the distribution of receipts
from sales income.
Please call if von have anv questions concerning tax forfeited lands.
Our office will be happy to help you in any way we can.
OFFICE, OF THE LAND CGHfITSSIONER
292.7087
WHEREAS, The Board of County Commissioners of Ramsey
County, by resolution dated , classified as
non -conservation land, certain land lying within the limits
of the City of ; and
WHEREAS, A certified copy of the classification resolu-
tion together with a list of the land classified has been sub-
mitted for approval of the classification and sale of the land
classified in accordance with MSA, Section 282.01, sub. 1;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED That the classification of
the land shown on said list as non -conservation land and the
sale thereof be and hereby is approved; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED That the City Clerk be and hereby
is authorized to file a certified copy of this resolution in
the Office of the Land Commissioner.
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
) ss
COUNTY OF RAMSEY )
I' , Clerk
of the City of , do hereby
certify that the above is a true and correct copy of a
resolution passed by the Council of the City of
at its meeting held on the day of , 19,
City Clerk
r
WHEREAS, The Board of County Commissioners of Ramsey County by Resolution
dated classified as non -conservation land, certain land lying
within the limits of the City of .^.d
WHEREAS, A copy of the classification resolution together with a list of
the land classified has been submitted for approval of the classification in
accordance with Minnesota Statutes Annotated, Section 282.01, sub. 1; and
WHEREAS, The City of has determined that said land is
required for purposes;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, That said classification of the land shown
on said list as non -conservation land is hereby approved; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the proper City officials be and hereby are
authorized to make an application for conveyance of said tax forfeited land
for purposes; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the City Clerk be and hereby is authorized
' to file a certified copy of this resolution and application for conveyance
of said tax forfeited land in the Office of the Land Commissioner.
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
) ss
COUNTY OF RAMSEY )
I, , Clerk of the City of do
hereby certify that the above is a true and correct copy of a resolution
passed by the Council of the City of at its meeting held
on the day of 19_
City Clerk
SEAL
Resolution I''°�'f "Ju0i L. wi r:v!!rn, .Puia
Board of 'v......................... .... ...
_...
:�amseJr Coon y Colnmrssroners
.'resented By Cemmissimivr Finley Data _flay j loAO
Lien Lion: T/v �
Reiter, land Commissioner;
No. 80-485
RESOLVED, By the Board of Ramsey County Commissioners chat in the
event a local governmental subdivision submits an application for con-
veyance of tax forfeited lands for re -sale purposes, said local govern-
mental subdivision shall pay an appraised value as determined by the
Board of Ramsey County Commissioners; And Be It Further
RESOLVED, That the Ramsey County Land Commissioner is directed to
convey this policy decision to all the local governmental subdivisions
in Ramsey County.
14
ROSERT J. ORr ,-Cha.' l
b7n �
Cite.; teA, • Owtty uaA
Policy - Cost recovery by local government for maintenance of tax forfeited lands
Costs incurred by local government for removal of buildings, trees, weeds
or debris should be certified to the county auditor for collection.
When the tax forfeited land is sold, such charges may then be recovered
as other charges for local improvements in the distribution of receipts
from sales income.
Municipalities are obligated to maintain tax forfeited lands consistent
with adjoining properties until such time as the land Commissioner's
Office receives approval of sale by Council Resolution.
4-
a
3
Y,
4Pv,2
q-g
(� 10
IL Q
"fA�C gr
FA�((Iog
0 c
� m
3
I
%,,&1\_T7
TO: Mayor & City Council
FROM: Finance Director -Treasurer Brager
DATE: November 10, 1982
RE: PROPOSALS FOR 1982 AUDIT
Pursuant to Council direction I have obtained proposals from
four C.P.A. firms for conducting the 1982 audit. Proposals were
solicited from local firms only. Past experience has indicated
that the rates charged by nationally known firms are substantially
more than those of local firms and I did not sense that the Council
wished to increase audit costs substantially at this time.
Firms that proposals were received from are briefly described
in the following paragraphs. A summary of their proposals is
contained in later paragraphs.
DeLaflunt, veto & Company, Ltd. is located at 1310 East Highway
96, White Bear Lake, Minnesota. Half of the firms fifteen staff
members specialize in governmental audits. The firm currently
audits fifteen cities, the majority of which are located in Ramsey
and Dakota counties. All of the members of our data processing
organization, the Ramsey County Consortium of Municipalities (RCCM),
are presently audited by this firm.
The George M. Hansen Company is located at Wayzata Boulevard
and Highway 100, St. Louis Park, Minnesota. This firm specializes
in the audit of governmental units. The firm currently audits
twenty two cities, the majority of which are located in Anoka and
Hennepin counties. Prior to the 1981 audit the George M. Hansen
Company had been the City's auditors for over fifteen years.
The firm of Anfinson, Hendrickson and Company is located at
5353 Wayzata Boulevard, St. Louis Park; Minnesota. The firm
specializes in the audit of governmental units. The firm currently
audits nine cities in the metro area.
The firm of Wilkerson, Guthmann, and Johnson, Ltd. is located
in the Northwestern Bank Building, St. Paul, Minnesota. It is an
established local firm which is seeking to expand its operations to
include governmental audits. In order to do so the firm hired a
former employee of the Municipal Audit Section of the State Auditor's
Office. The firm's only municipal client is the City of Eagan.
The Finance Department feels that it is beneficial to both
the City and the auditing firm to establish a continuing relationship.
From the City's standpoint a continuing relationship is important
because of quality of audit and cost-effectiveness. The quality of
the audit will generally improve after the first year's audit due
to the firm's familiarity with the City's accounting procedures
and policies. During the first year with a new client, quite a bit
of time is spent reviewing the City's policies, ordinances, and
resolutions. This is time consuming and costly for both the auditor
November 10, 1982
page 2
and the City. It is, thus, more cost-effective for the City and
the auditor to have a continuing relationship.
For the reasons mentioned above each auditing firm was asked
to give a proposal for one year and also provide a proposal assuming
a three year relationship. Proposals for one year are listed below:
DeLailunt, Veto $7,700.
George M. Hansen $7,900.
Anfinson, !Hendrickson $8,000.
Wilkerson, Guthmann & Johnson $9,500.
All of the prices proposed are quoted as "not to exceed"
provided that City staff can complete all of the year end closings
and adjustments. In the past, staff has relied upon the auditors
for assistance in the year end closing process in the areas of fixed
assets and special assessments. This reliance upon the auditors
has been decreasing over the past few years but still exists. The
DeLaHunt, Veto firm has estimated these costs to not exceed $3,500.
The other firms did not make such an estimate but indicated addition-
al services would be billed at their standard rates. Those rates
range from $20.00 - $50.00 per hour. Finance Department staff will
meet with representatives of the auditing firm chosen and plan the -
conduct of the audit so that City staff can prepare and gather as
much information as possible so as to minimize charges for additiona-
services. Some of the problems that may be encountered in minimizing
these charges are discussed in the following paragraph.
In the past we have sought to have the audit completed and a
report prepared as close to the first of May as possible. If finance
department personnel are not available due to illness or other un-
forseen circumstances cause delays such that this deadline cannot
be meet, additional charges may be incurred. At this time the extent
of information the auditors may require staff to gather or worksheets
to prepare is not known. As such, it is not known whether enough
time would be available to perform normal departmental duties plus
accumulate all the data required and meet the May 1 deadline. A
problem experienced last year which caused delays and additional
costs was the inability of the County to provide data on a timely
basis about delinquent taxes and assessments. For these reasons staff
cannot say that there will not be additional charges. Staff will,
however, sincerely try to minimize these additional costs.
Three year proposals submitted are as follows:
DeLaIlunt, Veto
1982
$7,700
1983
$8,500
1984
$9,400
Average Price
$8,533
November 10, 1982
Page 3
George M. Hansen
1982
$7,900
1983
$0,700
1984
$9,600
Average
Price $8,733
Anfinson, Hendrickson
1982
$8,000
1983
$8,500
1984
$9,000
Average
Price $8,500
Wilkerson, Guthmann, & Johnson
1982 $8,500
1983 $9,500
1984 $10,500
Average Price $9,500
In submitting three year proposals each firm listed conditions
' under which future years' prices would be subject to renegotiation.
These include a significant change in City operations which would
expand the scope of the audit or a turnover in key finance department
personnel or any other subsequent event which would lessen the
present degree of involvement of the finance department in the year
end closing process and preparation of work papers.
I would recommend that the Council give serious consideration
to engaging the DeLaHunt, Vote firm to conduct audits for 1982, 1983,
and 1984. I feel that they would be able to provide the best service
at reasonable prices. The DeLallunt, Voto firm is the only firm, of
the four we received proposals from, which audits many other Ramsey
County cities. As such they have a familiarity with County personnel
and property records which the other firms do not. This enables them
to more efficiently obtain and interpret County data. This firm also
audits other RCCM cities which have the same or similar accounting
systems that we have.
I believe that the DeLallunt, veto firm conducts a more thorough
review of the City's financial policies and practices than other
firms. This was, I believe, evidenced by the management letter and
recommendations we received last year.
If you have any questions do not hesitate to contact• me.
DA/ds
j6o�v
MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Director of Public Works/Community Development
DATE: November 10, 1982
SUBJECT: LIFT STATION 13 AT EDGEWOOD DRIVE AND COUNTY ROAD I
On October 4, 1982, pump #1 motor in lift station #3 failed. Further
investigation during repair determined that the pump impellar slipped
on the pump shaft and bound up in the pump casing causing the motor
to burn out. The pump impellar was also damaged and required replace-
ment. These repairs cost approximately $1,100 for parts and motor
repair and approximately 12 manhours. Maintenance personnel are of
the opinion that pump #2 may soon require similar major maintenance.
This event prompted staff to review in a very preliminary fashion the
feasibility of eliminating lift station #3 similar to lift station #5
on Quincy Street last year. The following data has been researched
(see attached sketch for lift station service area).
1) Lift station #3 was built in 1965.
2) Lift station #3 pumps an average of 6 to 10 hours per day at
550+ gallons per minute.
3) Annual electricity costs; 1980-$616.55, 1981•-So51.51, 1982
(estimate)-$674.33.
4) Elevation of inlet to lift station is 882.0 and elevation
of bottom of wet well is 875.33.
5) Elevation of Metro Waste Control Commission 66 inch inter-
ceptor sewernear Edgewood Drive and Bronson Drive is 861.54.
6) Distance from lift station to Metro Waste Control Commission
sewer is 1100+ feet.
7) Preliminary construction cost estimate:
1100 feet of 12 or 15 inch sewer
25 feet deep
Pavement and sod restoration
New meter station
TOTAL
EngAncering
$120,000 - $145,000
$50,000 - $65,000
$25,000 - $36,000
$195,000 - $246,000
$29,000 - $37,000
Staff requests direction from City Council as to whether to pursue a
more detailed feasibility study of phase out of lift station #3
A
Mayor and City Council
Page 2
November 10, 1982
including possible funding sources such as Metro Waste Control
Commission and and Municipal State Aid (street repair) for portions
of project. Feasibility study would require 60 to 100 manhours and
a field survey to locate existing facilities. Study could be done
inhouse in early 1983 if survey work is done yet this year.
JCJ/bc
0
1 KENO TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Director of Public Works/Community Development
DATE: November 12, 1982
SUBJECT: WATER METER SERVICE PROGRAM
The water meter service program through November 9, 1982, has
tested 258 meters. Servicing and testing has shown that only 29%
(approximately 75 meters) were in acceptable operating condition.
The balance of the meters had problems ranging from minor leaks,
to plugged with manganese, to radical metering. One meter was in
error 54 percent at a flow rate of 10 gallons per minutes.
Thirty-four meters were found to be inoperative or providing
erroneous readings. Of the 34 bad meters, 26 of them were Corad
meters installed between 1973 and 1977. The system at the start of
the study had 356 Corad meters. The major cause of erroneous
readings appears to be manganese deposits in the meters. These '
deposits are significantly worse southerly of Highway 10. The Corad
meter tests ranged from 3-4 percent to 54 percent in error with 12
_ meters off more than 10 percent.
Review of the water billing records for the 26 corad meters indicates
annual water useage of 38,000 gallons to 275,000 gallons. The aver-
age water consumption for the 26 Corad meters is approximately
130,000 gallons per year.
If a meter were off 15 percent, the estimated annual overcharge would
range from $3.15 to $22.70 per year. The average annual overcharge
would be $10.75 per year. For the approximately 100 corad meters
southerly of Highway 10, this could add up to $1,075 per year in over-
charge. Staff would like direction from the Council on the following
items:
1) How should the possible overcharge be handled with the
customers.
2) Mr. Groberg has approximately 24 days of employment left.
All 24 days will not be necessary to finish the balance
of the service on 42 meters. Should Mr. Groberg concentrate
on removing as many Corad meters as time and meter supplies
allow?
3) Does the Council wish to modify the meter service program
for 1983?
Nap exhibits will be available November 15, 1982, to illustrate
testing results and meter locations. If you have any questions, please
contact me.
JCJ/bc
CMEMO TO: Clerk -Administrator and City Council
FROM: Engineering/Planning Technician��i
DATE: November 4, 1982
SUBJECT: VEHICLE SALES AT NORTHEAST MARINE
The Planning Commission at their November 3rd Regular Meeting
directed staff to forward to the City Council their concerns regard-
ing the selling of vehicles by a used car dealer at Northeast Marine
located at Silver Lake Road and Highway 10. The Planning Commission
had noticed two pickup trucks with "for sale" signs in their windows
parked on the Northeast Marine property. Staff was directed by the
Planning Commission to determine ownership of the vehicles. A check
on these vehicles revealed that they are the possession of a used
car dealer. Staff was informed by the Police Department that the
owner of Northeast Marine is a licensed car dealer, and the two
vehicles in questions are being sold by a dealer whose business name
is Northeast Marine.
The Planning Commission is concerned about possible zoning violations
involving the selling of used vehicles in areas where businesses other
than auto sales exist or in residential areas. It is the opinion of
Attorney Meyers that in order for a particular location to sell used
cars, it must first be properly zoned and secondly, the dealer must be
licensed in the City. In the case of Northeast Marine, the property
is properly zoned for motor vehicle sales although an existing business
presently occupies the property, and the dealer is not licensed in
the City to conduct used car sales.
The Planning Commission does not
become a used car lot and would
direct staff should you need any
FJR/bc
i
want this property, over time, to
recommend Council review. Please
additional information.
MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Director of Public Works/Community Development
DATE; November 12, 1982 /
SUBJECT: WAYNE NERR/KNOLLWOOD GREEN DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL
Attached are the following items:
1) Planning Commission Resolution of -approval.
2) Staff report used at 7/7/82 Planning Commission meeting.
3) Staff memorandum dated 8/25/82.
4) Letter from Project Engineer to Fire Marshal.
5) Letter from Fire Marshal approving knock -down barriers/ o
emergency gate design.
6) Original Rice Creek Watershed District permit approving
five 8-unit buildings.
7) Letter from Rice Creek Watershed District dated 11/3/82
approving revised plan of four buildings and retention
pond modifications.
8) Letter from Project Engineer dated 8/10/82 responding to
Planning Commission's concerns voiced at their 7/7/82
meeting.
9) Memo from Attorney Meyers discussing condominiums.
10) Memo from Police Chief Grabowski.
11) Copy of site plan.
This application has progressed through the Planning Commission review
process and all documents requested by the Planning Commission have
been received. It is now ready for action by the Council.
Staff recommends the City Council at the 11/22/82 meeting schedule the
public hearing for their 12/13/82 regular Council meeting.
If you have any questions or comments, please contact me.
JCJ/bc
Attachments
MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. 56-112
CITYOF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY UP RAMI;EYI,Y
STATP OF MTNNESOTA
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE COND11-10NAL USE
PERMIT REQUEST AND DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL OF
WAYNE HERR CON';TRUCTION COMPANY
WHEREAS, the applicanL, Wayue 11orr, has requested to construct
4-II ,nit condominitun building) aL a :;iLv lortited at 2900 Highway 10;
and
WHEREAS, the applicant is requesting Development Stage approval
for this project under the Planning Unit Development Chapter of the
Zoning Code; and
WHEREAS, per existing Zoning Code, a conditional use permit is
required for residential P.U.D. projects; and
WHEREAS, the Planned Unit Development is intended to introduce
flexibility of site design and architecture for the conservation of
land and open space through clustering of building and activities
Lhrough conditional use provisions; and
WHEREAS, the site plan submitted meets minimum zoning and planned
un.i(. development zon.inq requirement:;; And
WHEREAS, the development is cuusisLanL with the existing zonigg
for the property, R-4, High Density Residential; and
WHEREAS, condominium developments arc allowed in an R-4, High
Density Residential District;
NOW, THEREFORE, DE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning
Commission recommends approval of the conditional use permit request
under the Residential P.U.D. Chapter of the Zoning Code provided that:
1) An open space buffer be maintained between the southernmost
condominium unit and the R-1, Single Family Residential Area.
Such open space shall be no less thatn 156 feet from north to
south.
2) The full 25 foot roadway width be maintained during all seasons
for emergency vehicle access on all streets within this develop-
ment including the 25 foot road easement to the south of this
property.
3) The design of the knock down barrier be submitted and approved
by the Fire Chief prior to conditional use permit final approval.
4) A landscape plan shall be submitted to conform with Chapter 40.22,
Subdivision D(10).
.planning Commission
Resolution No. 56-02
Page 2
5) Public Iieariny notices regarding the conditional use permit be
sent to all property owners within the following area:
a) South of highway 10 - the area east of Spring Lake Road,
north of County Road i and west of Crovcland Road.
b) North of highway 10 - within a radius of 350 feet of the
north property line of this development.
6) Per the copy of site plan dated August 25, 1982, the following
items delineated on this plan should be maintained:
{,h
a) Northernmost building setback is 40 feet from Highway 10.
b) Distance between buildings is 30 feet.
c) Ponding volume of .16 acre feet minimum.
d) Sixty-four covered and twenty-nine uncovered parking
spaces (4 handicapped spaces will be provided). o
c) Specific areas for trash collection.
f) As modified from the original plan, fire flow to this r..
development shall be 1,500 gallons per minute at a minimum.
g) Sanitary sewer service to connect to existing main at
Fnollwood Drive and Oakwood Drive.
h) Cross easement access to property to the east off of
Highway 10.
i) Northernmost garage setback to be 40 feet from Highway 10.
ATTEST:
(SEAL)
Adopted this 1st day of Septem�er, 1982.
Chairman
Director of Public Works/Community
Development
C
t
CASE: 89-81, Item 4 on 7 7/02 Plannin Commission A enda
ITEM: Develop (cvicw 40 Unit Condominium Proposa
APPLICANT: Skyline Development Co.
LOCATION: 2908 Highway 10
Legal: Auditor's Subdivision No. 89
Lot 51
SUMMARY 01" RE'QUEST
See attached letter from J;nucs DCBenedotr I'.R., dated May 26, 1902.
To summarize, the applicant is proposing to construct 5-8 unit
condominiums on the property. Ifc is applying to the City under
the P.U.D. chapter of the '!.Doing Code.
13ACKG1JOUND INFORMNI-ION
This project dates back approximately 3 years. Back in 1979, the
developer, George Halverson, requested City approval to construct
a 40 unit apartment complex.
sOn April 25, 1979, the Planning Commis -
ion recommended to the Council denial of the project. The reasons
for denial arc outlined in the minutes of April 25, 1979, On Septem-
ber nsi eras the City Council conceptually approved the projectOwith
5 considerations:
1) Adequate buffering and fencing for the single family
homes to the south.
2) Requirements of Resolution No. 983 be met.
3) Looped watermain.
4) Double access to the development (one of which could
be for emergency purposes only).
5) A 30 foot road easement be granted along the west
property line from Highway 10 to the property's south
lot line. (The easement can be used for private pur-
poses until such a time when a public road is constructed.)
Nothing substantial was done to the development until March 12, 1980,
when staff received a request from the developer to change the plan
from the 48 unit apartment complex to 48-52 condominium units. The
Council then felt that the issue be sent back to the Planning Commis-
sion for review.
On June 3, 19811 the developer, now Wayne Herr Construction Company,
went before the Planning Commission for development approval of a
40 unit condominium (5 buildings). Following considerable discussion,
the matter was tabled until information was received from the attorney
regarding state condominium laws and sketches from staff to provide
access to adjacent properties.
From June 3rd to the present, no additional information was presented
nor had any action been taken on the development proposal. i
CASE 89-81
Page 2
PLANNING CONS I DE.RAT T014S 7/7/82
Zoning and Land Us(I:
1)„Existing zoning on the property is R-4 which allows
condominiums by definition.
2) Comprehensive Plan .land use denotes the area adjacent to
Il.ighway 10 medium density residential with single family
residential toward the southern portion of the lot. Map
Mid narrative for Planning District 012 are attached for
your review.
Site Plan:
jRoadway width for the emergency access should be 25 feet
mininami• Plans show roadway being 14 feet.
0113y definition, the front lot line is the line which abutts,
Ilighway 10. The rear lot line is the line opposite the
front- lot line. Rear yard setback of 50 feet is not met.
Plans show 47.67 feet. Front and side yard setbacks are
met. (40.22, Subd. Cldl)
51 Building is located 10 feet from the curb line. Code
requires a 20 foot distance from the building to the curb.
(40.22, Subd. Cld3)
Distance between buildings, in this case, is required to
be 30 feet (height of building). Plans show 20 feet.
(40.22, Subd. Cld4)
5) No planting plan has been submitted.
G) Parking requirements for condominiums are 2k spaces per
unit, two of which shall be garages. Eight garage spaces
are provided in each building (40 total), 40 separate
garage spaces are shown and 31 uncovered spaces are provided.
This requirement has been met. Handicapped spaces are
adequate.
7) The apartment units meet minimum floor area requirements.
8) In the letter from Mr. DeDenedet, he mentioned that they
would be installing a concrete grid pavement system which
allows grass to grow through, yet also support vehicles.
This type of system may cause some problems from a mainten-
ance/mowing standpoint.
r
CASE 89-81
I'age 3
CPublic Improvements and Services:
1) This plan .is i.dcntical to the one submitted in May of 1981
for review by the Planning Commission on June 3, 1981.
Pan 0oxrud of :Ihorl.-Iilli.otl-Ilendrickson reviewed the
('evelopment• at that- time (a copy of: his report dated May
29, 19111, is aLLached).
2) The requiremenL•s of Resolution No. 983 have been met.
3) Sanitary sewer service is adequate.
4) The developer is proposing the installation of a watermain
to connect to the existing main on Spring Lake Road. Utility
easements would need to be acquired to cross to Spring Lake
Road. Tile location of this proposed watermain will, as pro-
posed by the developer., cross the property to the west not
on a lot line but approximately 100 feet north of its south
lot line (Lot 27). This lot and the lots west of it are iq
Spring Lake Park.
5) No drainage easements are shown on the property.
C6) The Fire Chief has reviewed this development previously and with the exception of the width of the emergency only access
being too narrow (24 foot wide improved area), the plan meets
with his approval.
Access:
1) The issue was brought up in previous meetings that the
properties to the west of this development may want to sub-
divide off the back of their lots in the future.
2) Should the property to the east decide to develop, right-of-
way for a frontage road should be required so that an addi-
tional curb cut onto highway 10 be avoided.
C
F.
R 2
'
......
! I
i
'I II I Y�
w ... d
n •wn rlxu• p¢bn
�,
I I 1
\
4
R-1
R�2 LOCATION Of KHDLLVVOOP.'.,&REEN
'"'GONDOMIHION ?YOF05AL-
R I
0-3
R-3 R3
B
B
2, ......
3 -2
R-3
R 2
R-3
B,3
- 'k
4
R-1
-3
B-1
0-2 R 2
ip
0-3
B-3
R.
d pl,
-I
I... B-3
I'A
Existing Zoning 2B- 3'
R, I Singla Family 13,2 Retail Business
R-2 Two Family B,3 Ganoiuiot,sincss
R,3 General Residence
B'I Limped Business
I 'I Light Indotiol
52
R-3
I If
district 12
4. •. II I YG
w' I' II rI t
If o
�I
rill 'il'(11N1i
C
PARK
lrfill IV11,
P i "•! OMA n
I
- 5prrni):1 I,,
1 cka' LiI
I II
1 LN "
'I•'t' �) I i Ii
LOCAPOM of Kno«wooD GRU1-1 COMO MIUM MrD15AL.
proposed land use natural features*
flood plain/metro ores
LD Low dvnsily wJJcnl;ul I___.J designated wetlands
M D Medium Jcrnily lesiJcnlilll �N��1I�� Steep ;lope:
M D/,r F:1cJiv:n Junsily hailer I:a,k U''j Tree massing
1.1 D High Jensily w5idowinl *Approximate locations - subject to
detailed review of lime of proposed
Jevolollawnt
NC f•lciyhhah.loJ cuuuncicivl
1-1C highway commcrclal
IND In:Ivst,i,J
J S Schaal
C Church
P Pa6lpwl, dily 195
DISTRICT 12
A portion of Dislricl I? ubuis Highway 10. l.euxl use along the highway is prese"
r
a mix of strip commercial mxl residential. Additional strip commercial develops.
should not he allowed in this District, rothur ranunercial development should be
encouraged to locale in Dislricl• I and 2. sNhcn redevr:lopnu:nt opportunities become
available along Iligliwoy 10, a medium daa•,ity lypc of residential development is
considered to he HOW uppiopricde Ihao continued commercial development. The
remainder of the District is predomiiwnlly single family residential and this pattern
should be nlaiidained.
Spring Lake is Ida City's only nalurul lake which is ahutted by Fridley and Spring
Lake Park. Lakeside Park is jointly owned by the cities of Spring Lake Park and
Mounds View and is administrated by I-Weside Park Commission. The City should
consider development of the land along Ilia shore of Spring Lake to provide a
variety of recreational opportunities for the residents of the district.
194
L' :•; r tl10�N1 I I
do IV'
If l x J \\ Ir1l I IIII m111110 ftllWne ..
1 pmlNul .Nl IM INOWC MI
iI II r 01 mre anal p¢lu
II 1 mu1NImInIInIQxII1Q
"t � •� II •� II .� .i E—Ij
+ , , u •N I, \ r I
� I I 111' 1 IIY NV N11'
I IpI
N ,Ix I� � � .. •II •rr,x •� II r� II "l Ii l,• A' .. ....._ ..... _.. .
L.rl `Q•. I i •I 9 I
�\; J
•I[ul 1p:. . 1 f' ,' it I !V II I ' ' .••�• pC.r__�.a_.
SIT PxoP.•,n _�m�_,.1
mewwv. KIM
All1If� ,III
I � IYNNh Wx, II
NN•� .19nl.+rn. •.l. � III ,'� ;j al.w..11.nyl
tlp .o� nl'r o.xl II 111 �"' II `
- � r^ Iw J � � t NxINiI •� I%...ey, „,rI A � 'i.
u 1 II hI I :I
n • ��+ Il aobt I •-:I ' J a ln.r III fu ��
•'n. I�IL.,, II' ^f `r•,r,.._rl�
• N•.,.n �.1 I ( A h � lei
,
•� � LR Il •n a .� �...1.. �...'ll -J�I1 � ..� _SINN •....4 ........ .. ..lt frrr,
p yY I pll'
I ,Ir nwc�llal //,Iy •.,,
I
�1
j
V
i
a0. n "' � �\ '��,T :9e4. ,i .___.-"/+: ._.:__y ,h •tin•
`� .. •,' 2 5:.. ,�,_. e X_
'I v
Lw
KNO
LLWO
I G k rto/
IDO
CI e. :' •r LJ '
I,u
' � rl ' •-- �. SC of �
I A
13 )� lI 12Lc I I 1 I 2757 7-19 Li
.32 •t
HILL 4-
LO
Y�
3CK
k r_
ono 0 r
Lai Z-asTi
rw.l. r d I f I 3 on.a
/JO.23 a v • I (1� i e t ] .� 12 .�7 /� �3J I d ` 5 9
q ry 1_
— 13� �. � I / � HO an.•
Af
1 I _•.•r
25
I
rpU,
I �— �T•L' r I � � I S7u
u oto
I 10 •xui I s 1L
1-t a o I
I r 67 i /n
•�Il•)1 n� I a IY
MEMO TO: Planning Commission
Director of Public Work.:;/CommuniLy Development
PROM: Engineering/Planning Technician
DATE: August 25, 1902
t ulm,cl'i Wayne Herr Condominium Proho::al
Attached for your review and consideration is a revised site plan
received August 24 and a .leLtcr from the engineer to the developer
giving his response to the concerns the Planning Commission voiced
at your July 7 regular meeting (a copy of the minutes is also
attached).
Staff has reviewed the site plan pursuant to the Planning Commission
concerns. A brief summary follows:
1) Ten foot distance from curb to building - Section 40.22,
Subdivision C(1) states that no building shall be located
less than 20 feet from the back of the curb line. Original°
plans show a 10 foot distance between the building and curb.
The developer has revised the site plan, changing the design
of the building by eliminating a breakfast nook area to the
rear of the building, thus narrowing its size. Revised
' plans now show a 20 foot distance from building to curb.
2) Snow removal issue - The engineer has addressed this item
in his letter whereby the homeowners association will provide
snow removal for the emergency vehicle access and the snow
will be deposited in the open areas of the site, not on
Knollwood Drive right-of-way. Staff's concern is still that
during the plowing of this area, snow will be deposited
directly on lots adjacent to this 25 foot right-of-way. The
fire department .is requiring that the fi,1.1- 14-25 foot ::idth
be plowed for emergency access. Should the snow plow "slip"
from one side to another and not stay within this 25 foot
right-of-way area, the plow may end up tearing up the lawns
of adjacent property owners. Staff would recommend the
Planning Commission review this item.
3) Emergency overflow approval from Rice Creek Watershed District -
Staff has received a permit approval from Rice Creek Watershed
District (RCWD) for the construction of a 40 unit condominium
development. This permit was issued based upon a previous site
plan, when the developer was proposing 5-8 unit buildings. I
have spoken with the engineers from RCWD and they said that the
developer has submitted all necessary material needed, including
a plaii fur emergency overflow, for RCWD to approve and the
engineers are recommending approval of the plan. Emergency
overflow will occur via the existing swale to the southwest and
flow will be no greater Lhan Resolution No. 983 allows.
MEMO - Wayne Ilerr CUIR1O111iniUm Proposal
August 25, 1982 '
Page 2
The Planning Comm.is:;ion may want to refrain from granting ' approval until nlaff has received a copy of a current
approved permit from RCWD.
ol'1)ermit. Staff will advise as to receipt
4) 1,500 gallons per minute fire flow - The revised plans show
an 0 inch looped watermain out to Highway 10 then along the
south side of Highway 10 connecting to the 12 inch main on
Groveland Road. Staff's review of this proposal indicate
that this system should provide, the necessary pressure and
fire flow to serve the proposed:development.
5) Fire Department's decision on knock -down barrier - The fire
department has indicated that they still need additional
information on the proposed knock -down barriers for this
development•. Staff has informed the fire department to ask
the engineer directly for additional information needed to
render a decision. We will receive copies of any new plans
and any decision by the fire department and forward copies
to you.
6) 40 foot distance from northern building to north property
linte
lan
theeaboveerevised location.S1Thepengineersdid1notnce havean f0feet at
opportunity
.
to redraw the plan showing this 40 feet to scale. The plan
does nonetheless show 40 feet.
7) The obtaining of a valid access permit to Highway 10 - Staff
has spoken to officials of MnDOT regarding access to Highway 10.
They said that, for the most part, the permit has already been
approved. An application has been submitted and reviewed and,
pending receipts of fees, the permit will be issued. MnDOT is
requiring two items prior to permit approval:
a. a 32 foot driveway entrance. The site plan does
show a 32 foot driveway; and
b. a right turn lane off of Highway 10.
Staff concurs with the MnDOT findings and in addition, would
recoimnend an acceleration lane with a 50 foot curb radius from
this development to eastbound Highway 10.
0) easement for access to the property to the east - The revised ++
plans do show an easement adjacent to Highway 10 for possible I. future access to the property to the east.
II
The only loose ends at this point would seem to be:
1) Snow removal issue. '
2) Rice Creek Watershed District Permit receipt.
i
MGMo - Wayne Ilerr Condominium Proposal
August 25, 1982
Cage 3
3) Fire department decision on knock -down barrier.
4) MnDOT access permit receipt.
staff hiA recommended to the devvioper t.het, since school children
living 'in these units will be boarding a hus to school on the south
side of this devulupment (as opposed to on Ilighway 10), a pathway
be proposed from the units to Oakwood Drive via the emergency access
route. Phis path would be maintained year around for emergency
vehicle access. This pathway may alleviate school age children
from cutting through neighbors lots in order to get to bus stops.
For your information only, the issue of access to the properties to
the west of this development may surface again. The Planning Commis-
sion may want to decide whether this item should be discussed again
or if discussion is complete.
Staff drafted a resolution recommending approval of the conditional
use permit which would have been approved at the July 7, 1982 Planning
Commission meeting if approval was given. Please review this resolu-
tion for possible adoption at this next meeting. If you do not have a
copy, please let me know.
�- If you have any other questions before the meeting, please call me.
Have a good weekend.
FJK/bc
Attachments
• 014ur!nds
View Planwinr,t Cummi:,sipn
July
7, 1982
Itegular
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Meeting
Page
Three
Moli.uu/Satund: hinkv/McC.nllly Lo L'able .! deuirion -
iinl.il the AtvjiI:cl 4 mu:etirul, which will liv(. Ihv
Wayne Ilc!!' Cunsl.ruelion Cu. lima Lo make Lhr
required update:; and t.haL JIv needed,
Lhoso hein(I monL.iuned eariie!: by AeLinrj Chairman
D!cskr: aQ;!s sLatcd bylaw:
1) 10 foot distance from curb to building.
2) Snow removal issue.
J) Rmerquney overflow approval from !lice Crook.
Wat.crshed District.
4) 1,500 gallnns Per minuLe fire fluw.
5) Fire Department's dc!ei.sion on a (Couch -down
barrier.
6) Plan to show northernmost building 40 feet
from the north properly line, measured
perpendicular to the line.
7) The obtai.ninq of: a valid acc(gs:: perm!ii to
Highway 10.
8) Easement for access Lo the properly to the
cast.
4 ayes 0 nay:;
Motion Carried
Acting Chairman Ureske state(] the Planning Commis-
6. Informmat 1
lion, an required by the City Charter, had been
Meeting: C. ,,te:
reviewing Chapter 40, and had met with the City
40 Zoning, Re -
Council to discuss Life changes made by the Planning
view of Chapter
Commission, and Lo go over some quostionable areas.
Revisions,
Ile added the City Attorney is reviewing the changes
Recommendations
made, and the City Council will be holding a public
to City Council
hearing bOfore adopting the changes. lie stated
that noLico of the public hearing would be published
in the New Brighton Bulletin.
Acting Chairman oreske revi.cwed the process the
Planning Commission had followed, and answered
questions from the audience.
There was no Chairman's report. 7. Chairman's Repo:
It was noted that Councilmcmber l'orslund was not U. Discuss Past .
present to update the Planning Commission on Council Action
City Council action. aQd Next Agenda:
Technician•Kampel stated that only item on the
August 4 agenda, to date, was the Wayne Herr
Construction Co.
Technician Kampel stated he would be asking
the City Attorney for an opinion on recent legi-
slation from the State regarding manufactured if
i�
James P. DeBenedet, P.E.
Consulting Engineer
October 6, 1982
Mr. Tom Skeate
Fire Marshall
City of Mounds View
1810 Highway 10
Spring Lake Park, MN 55432
Dear Mr. Skeate:
Enclosed is a copy of a detail drawing showing the proposed
emergency vehicle access barrier for the Knollwood Green
Project. This barrier is drawn and designed to conform with
our earlier conversations regarding a device which could be
used to block normal vehicular traffic from this project
to the south to Oakwood Drive, yet allow emergency vehicles
to enter the site.
If you have any questions in this regard, contact me at your
earliest convenience. I would request that if this meets
your approval, that you notify the City Council through Frank
Kampel.
Sincerely,
�, RX �-
James P. DeBenedet, P.E.
Consulting Engineer
JPDeB/dmn
Enclosure
CC: Wayne Herr
Frank Kampel
2146 Silver Lake Road New Br: 'AN 55112 (612) 631.1780
0
HEADQUARTERS
1810 Highway 10
Spring Lake Park, Minnesola 55432
October 14, 1982
Ur. Frank Kampel
City of Hounds View
2401 highway 10
St, Paul, Minnesota 55112
Dear Frank:
As discussed with you on the phone this date, the detailed drawing
of the emergency mate for the Knollwood Green project submitted to
me by James DeBenedet looks okay,
However, I want to note that the rest of the roadway would have to
be a solid foundation that would hold the heavy vehicles coming
through there. Jim mentioned paver block, which would be okay with
me.
Sincerely,
Thomas Skeste
Fire Marshal
TSJjs
RICEAREEK WATERSHED DIST:ffln'
SUITE 177, ARDEN PLAZA
3585 NORTH LEXINcToN AVENUE
ARDEN RILLS, MINNESOTA 55112
PERMIT
rPermit Application No. 82-58
RCWD Permit No. 82-58
cc: City of MoundsView
E.A. Hickok & Associates
RCWD File
Issued to: Skyline Development Company, 8433 Center Drive NE, Spring Lake Park
Location: 2908 Highway 10, MoundsView.
Purpose: Approval of a Land Development Plan for a 3.17+ acre
condominium development, 40 units.
At their meeting on July 28, 1982 the Board of Managers of the
Rice Creek Waters;,ed District reviewed your permit application and the re
ommendation of the District Engineer together with the following exhibits
1. Permit Application dated June 11, 1982.
2. Runoff calculations prepared by James P. DeBenedet, P.E., dated June 11, 1982.
3. Stormwater Management Plan for the Knollwood Green Development, prepared by
James P. DeDenedet, P.E., and dated June 11, 1982.
4. Letter from James P. DeBenedet, P.E., dated July 12, 1982. °
They found the project as planned to be in accordance with the Rules and
Regulations, and Guidelines of the District and therefore approved the
Permit as requested, with the following stipulations:
NONE
A followup inspection will be conducted at the project site to assure com-
pliance with all agreements, terms and/or stipulations to this Permit. Fai
urc to co -ply with the fuie uiu may resuic in rescission of the Permit, a
is in violation of Chapter 1219 MSA, a misdemeanor.
This document is not transferable, and is valid for one (1) year after the
date of issuance. If no construction activity has occurred after the one
year time period, this Permit must be renewed. If construction is underwa,
a time extension may be granted.
Please contact us at 433-0634 when the project is about to commence so an
J inspector may view the work in progress The enclosed Owner's Certificatic
must be forwarded within 10 days of project completion.
Date of Issue;_ August 9, 1982
garo
Form C3-79
11eRCBG• ani ers,,
Rise Creek water
:I:,85 LL,IINGION AVI NI It NUR II I. SUI IL II N
ANOLN IIILI S, AIINNI�SOIA 55112
ILILI'll(111I d.1:1•IU.IIs1a4
Ilovember •3, 1982
Board of Managers
Regular Meetings:
Mr. Geol,gv Illi.lverson 2nd and An Wednesdays
Okyline Development Company at Arden Hills City Hall
8433 Center Drive NE BONNIE TORPE, Admin. Ass'I.
Spring Lake Park, Minnesota 55432
Re: Permit Application 82-58: Skyline Development Company
Location: 2908 Highway 10, Mounds View
Purpose: Approval of a Land Development Plan for a 3.17+
acre condominium development, 40 units. —
Dear Mr. Halverson:
Receipt is acknowledged for a Stormwater Management Plan revised •
October 25, 1982 for the Knollwood Green Development along with a
letter from James P. DeDenedet, P.E. dated October 27, 1982.
These exhibits outline revisions to the plan that include a
reduction in the number of buildings on the site from 5 to 4 and a
minor change in the retention pond configuration.
These changes do not effect the overall Btormwater management of
the site, therefore, the District Engineer hereby administratively
approves of these changes.
Very truly yours,
EIIGE11F A. HICKOK AND ASSOCIATES
Engineers for the District
Peter R. Wilenbring
Civil Engineer
bt
cc: board
District office
F- Murray
Kty of Mound!] View
James P. Debenedet,
A CAHUINAL, Sit . UTANLN HAHSIAD
All, MA I I1u1111 HAMtiI I IVIIIIIY
",I -• j
P.E. i
BOARD 01 MANAGLHS
C.I KING LFI. SCOT T. SR.
WAS, 116URl Ln nAMSIY vwwy
E.A. PETRANGELO
ANOKA COUNFr
1 A UICCOK d ASSM'All S C-1101-q E-,wm ,, 413 444 . !HANK A MUHHAY Allurnry 222-5N9
4-
James P. DeBenedet, P.E.
Consulting Engineer
August 10, 1982
Mr. Prank Kampel
City of Mounds View
2401 Highway 10
Mounds View, MN 55112
Dear Mr. Kampel:
This letter is in response
1982 Mounds View Planning
to the proposed Knollwood
Herr Construction Company.
to questions raised at the July 7,
Commission regular meeting with regard
Green Condominium Development of Wayne
We will revise the building construction plans to enable us to
meet all setback distances; specifically a 20 foot setback from
curb to building and relocate the buildings to maintain a 40 foot
setback from, and at right angles, to T.H. 10.
We are proposing to construct an emergency vehicle access from
Oakwood Drive on the south through the 25 foot right of way of
Knollwood Drive. In order to provide an access which is wide enough
to meet city requirements we will be left with no room for snow stor-
age along the sides of the pavement. We are proposing to address
this problem by requiring in the homeowner's association covenants
that the homeowner's association provide for snow removal in this
area with snow being disposed of in the open areas on the site;
not on the right of way of Knollwood Drive.
The Rice Creek Watershed DistricL has approved our permit applica-
tion. As you are aware this was based on an earlier site plan.
However, I am familiar with the requirements of the Watershed
District and it is my opinion that the permit approval will be valid
provided that we submit a copy of the revised site plan showing a
storm water retention facility which has a volume equal to that
originally proposed. This requirement can more easily be met at
this time since we are proposing one less building on the current
site plan.
2146 Silver Lake Read
New Brivown, MN 55112 (612) 631.1780
Page 2
Mr. Frank Kampel
August 20, 1982
I have performed a hydraulic analysis of the proposed watermain
route -through this site. Based on the "Analysis of the City of
Mounds View Water System", prepared in 1978 by Consulting Engineers
Diversified, Inc., I have estimateu that residual pressure on this
site will be in excess of 23 psi. The Insurance Services Organiza-
tion, which typically rates fire fighting capabilities of the City's
water system, requires that residual pressures be 20 psi or greater.
In order to make this calculation I have relied on the water system
report which states that the minimum residual pressure on the city's
water main system was 31 psi (reference page 44) under a demand of
peak hourly flow plus a fire flow in this area of 3,000 gallons per
minute. I have also made other assumptions in order to arrive at
this calculation which I believe were exceedingly conservative.
I am willing to discuss my calculations and assumptions on this
matter with your City Eagineer. a
I have spoken to Dan Keuther of the Minnesota Department of Transpor-
tation regarding the access permit to Highway 10. Mr. Keuther
has indicated that the permit can be provided on the conditions that
the owner of the property request that the new permit application f
supersede the previous permit application and that we provide a 32 `
foot wide driveway entrance on the highway right of way with a
standard right turn lane. These changes have been made to the site
plan.
I have submitted a detail of the emergency vehicle knock down barrier
to Tom Skeat, Mounds View City Fire Marshall, on about July 1, 1982.
I hope that they have been able to review our proposal in this
regard and find it acceptable.
The site plan had been changed to show a 40 foot wide easement for
access to the property to the east.
I hope that this letter appropriately addresses all of the City's
cuucerns with regard to this application. If you have any questions
on any of these matters please contact me at your earliest con-
venience.
Sincerely,
an�J yes P. DeBenedet, P.E.
JPD/geg
tx
RICHARD MEYERS. P. A.
ATTORNEY AT LAW
I]L. VINO! Ol
Si. PAU L.IA MINI::SDTATA !"Ili
7111y 1I, 19N1
Mounds View Planning Commission
City of Mounds View
2401 highway 10
Mounds View, Minnesota 55112
Re: Condominium Ucvolopment
Members of the Commission:
�'134g` 0
,Y \� 6
o AU) 19 P.
,11
RECEIVED
CITY OF
\ =;: MOOS VIEW
You have recently submitted to this office a request G
for information relative to the state condominium laws as
they affect the City's subdivision regulations and zoning code.
' Chapter 40.02(18) defines condominium as "a multiple
dwelling containing individually owned dwelling units and jointly
owned and shared areas and facilities, which dwelling is subject
to the provisions of the Minnesota Condominium Law."
The present Minnesota Statutes relating to condominium
development has the following definitions:
Condominium means real estate, portions of which
are designated for separate ownership and the
remainder of which is designated for common
ownership solely by the owners of those portions.
Real estate is not a condominium unless the in-
dividual interests in the cutmnon elements are
vested in the unit owners.
Real estate means any interest in, over or under
land including structures which by law.pass with
a conveyance of land.
Unit means a portion of the condominium designated
for separate ownership.
Pursuant to the condominium law each unit constitutes for
all purposes a separate ap reel of real estate,
1
Page 2
The condominium law lrcventn the adoption of any zoning
subdivision or similar laws that would prohibit condominium
development but the law Jots not invalidate or modify any pro- I
visions of any zoning, subdivision, building code, ordinance,
charter provision or regulations relative to the development of
condominiums.
A condominium may be created only by recording a declaration
exci:utcd as a deed in the county involved. A description of a unit
which sets forth the number of the ron.b�minium, the count% in which
it is located, I:hu i.di:ntilyiiig rumi,Vi of tbo uric, is a sufficient
legal description of the real entai.0 ine:luded iu tho condominium.
Mounds Viuw Subdivision l(egul,Ati.un, Chapter 42,03(22), define
subdivision as the division of a parcel of land into two or more lots
or arcelss. Any change in property lines wl)HM necessitates City
approval bofore new deeds can be filed constitutes a subdivision.
42.03(5) defines a lot as a parcel or portion of land in a
subdivision separated from ollier parcels or portions by Tescription
for the purpose of sale or separate use thereof.
Further, the Mounds View 'Zoning Ordinance 40.04, Subd.oc(4)
provides that only one principal building may be located in a lot
(with certain exceptions).
It appears that at present there is only one specific
reference to condominiums in the municipal code which simply de:
same and referred to the state law relative to condominiums. The
state law can be interpreted to mean that each condominium unit
would be subject to the City's subdivision regulations and zoning
laws. Literal application of the subdivision laws to condominium
development would in effect prohibit condominium units since it
could be argued that each unit would require setbacks and other
restrictions. The state law clearly provides that a City cannot
prohibit a condominium development by its various ordinances.
Therefore, I would suggest that the Planning Commission study and
suggest the implementation of amendments to the zoning and sub-
divisie:: re -Options and nnecibly the bltildi:' CJdL- to uuntrol
the construction of condominium developr,:ent in the City.
Since the Mounds View Code provides that only one principal
building can be constructed on a lot, if a proposal is submitted
for the construction of two or more buildings.on a lot that are
to be condominiimized, it will be necessary that the property be
either subdivided or that a planned unit development be approved
by the City. Individual buildings, of course, would still have
to conform to the :zoning and subdivision regulations of the City
as to parking, setbacks and other provisions.,, /
Yours truly,
Richard Mayovs. '
Mounds View City Attorney
PAT[: May 29, 1981
TO: 6uitduu) O6 ft.iai.aC, Steve. Roee.
FROM: Vof.ice Ch.i.ej, F. C•tnbowaL.i
RE: RNOLLIVOOV WEN
I do no.t beUm, that the. h'to ec.ted condaminium cona.tnuc.tinn pnojeCt Witt
cacate ally omjat tllnA�ic plrohfems. I �ecf that Cihe any new devefoped area,
them. toi.f.f be minas pnobfetns that tape cane q themsofm when the. neeldenta get
acquainted with the. alien
PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA
Regular Meeting
f November 8, 1982
uNhi
Mounds View City Hall
,a 2401 Hwy, 10, Mounds View, MN 55112
-
--------=-------------------------------------------------------------
The Mounds View City Council was called to order 1. Call to Order
by Acting Mayor Hodges at 7:32 PM.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Councilmembers Blanchard and Doty, 2. Roll Call
and Acting Mayor Hodges,
It was noted Councilmember Forslund and Mayor
McCarty were absent.
ALSO PRESENT: City Attorney Meyers, Clerk/
A m n strator Pauley, and Public Works/
Community Development Director Johnson.
Motion/Second: Doty/Blanchard to approve the 3. Approval of
cto er 2, I982 minutes as corrected. Minutes:
October 25,1982
3 ayes 0 nays and November 3,
1982
Motion Carried
Motion/Second: Doty/Hodges to approve the November
372 minutes as corrected.
3 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Motion/Second: Doty/Blanchard to appoint Council -
member Hodges as Acting Mayor for the evening.
3 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
There were no residents requests or comments from 4. Residents Re -
the floor, quests and
Comments From
Floor
Motion/Second: Doty/Blanchard to approve the con- 5. Approval of
sent ageen a and waive the reading of the resolutions. Consent Agenda
�� 3 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Mounds' View City Council
Regular Meeting
---------------------------------
November 8, 102
Page Two
-------------------------------
Councilmember Doty noted that Item A was not new action
by the Council, but that there used to be no parking
signs on that side of the street, which were removed
during construction, and are now being put back up,
It was also noted there is a large parking lot on the
school property for people looking for parking space,
Acting Mayor Hodges closed the regular meeting and
opened the first public hearing at 7:40 PM,
Attorney Meyers advised the Council that a 4/5 vote
is required for a rezoning, but they could, however,
hold the public hearing.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reviewed the request of
the bank, and stated they could have the first
reading of the ordinance with only three members
present.
6A, Rezoning of
First State Ban
of New Brighton
Property from
B-3 to B; 2
Josey Warren, 8044 Greenwood, a member of the Plan-
ning Commission, stated the Planning Commission j
would strongly like this property rezoned to B-2,
as it would be in the best interests of the City, '
Acting Mayor Hodges closed the public hearing and
reopened the regular meeting at 7:45 PM, 4
Motion/Second: Doty/Hodges to have the first
readingOrdinance No, 324.
3 ayes 0 nays
Clerk/Administrator Pauley read Ordinance No. 324,
Motion/Second: Blanchard/Doty to have the second
reading, and adopt Ordinance No. 319, granting a
franchise to Group W Cable of the North Suburbs,
Inr a Minnesota. rornoraden to end
maintain a cable communication system in the City,
setting forth conditions accompanying the grant of
the franchise, providing for regulation and use of
the system, and prescribing penalties of the
violation of its provision, and waive the reading.
3 ayes 0 nays
Acting Mayor Hodges closed the regular meeting and
opened the second public hearing at 7:50 PM,
Motion Carried
7. Second Reading
and Adoption of
Ordinance No.
319, Granting a
Franchise to
Group W Cable of
the North Sub-
urbs, Inc,
Motion Carried
Director Johnson reported the questions of home 6B, Ordinance . 32
occupations was reviewed in depth by the Planning Amending Chptr,
Commission, with the Planning Commission recommend- 40, Regarding
ing Ordinance No. 322. Home Occupations
,t ,
Mounds View City Council November 8, 1982
Regular Meeting Page Three
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Planning Commissioner Warren reported the Planning
Commission had considered restricting the allowance
to residents, but did not include it in the ordinance
due to policing problems. They also adjusted the
exterior display sign size for home occupations,
and tried not to rule out anyone established prior
to the zoning ordinance enacted in the City.
Attorney Meyers stated he was comfortable with the
language of the ordinance.
Acting Mayor Hodges closed the public nearing and
reopened the regular meeting at 7:54 PM.
Motion/Second: Doty/Blanchard to have the first
reading of Ordinance No. 322, amending Chapter 40,
of the zoning code, entitled "Home Occupations","
and waive the reading.
3 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Motion/Second: Doty/Hodges to have the second 8. Second Reading
reading, and adopt Ordinance No. 320, amending and Adoption of
Chapter 26, entitled "Public Improvements", and Ordinance No. 32
waive the reading. Amending the
I3 ayes 0 nays Municipal Code o
Mounds View by
Amending Chapter
26, Entitled
"Public Improve-
ments"
Motion Carried
There was discussion on whether the ordinance
could be passed with a simple majority vote,
9. Second Reading
or
whether 3 votes were required, per the Charter.
and Adoption of
Ordinance No, 32
Attorney Meyers advised that a simple majority
was legal.
Amending the
Municipal Code o
Motion/Second: Blanchard/Hodges to table action
Mounds View by
Amending Chapter
on Ordinance No. 326 until the next regular
meeting so that the entire Council will be
107, Entitled
"Bingo"
"Bingo"
present.
2 ayes 1 nay
Motion Carried
Councilmember Doty voted against the motion.
' Acting Mayor Hodges closed the regular meeting and
opened the Lhird public heari<<g aL 8:01 PM,
,L • '
Mounds View City Council November 8, 1982
Regular Meeting Page Four
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attorney Meyers advised that, pursuant to State
statutes, the City elected not to come into
compliance, and this will be enforced until the
subdivision ordinance is next amended. He
added the City Council should be aware of the
120 day waiting period, whereby if they should
fail to move, a request would be deemed approved,
fie also advised that with the moritorium law,
that when the 1980 law went into effect, any
proposal that was before the City would be
approved. He recommended action be tabled until
the moritorium law either expires or is repealed.
Acting Mayor Hodges closed the public hearing and
reopened the regular meeting at 8:07 PM.
Director Johnson asked if another public hearing
would be required if the matter is not discussed
again until April. Attorney Meyers responded
that it would be best to hold another public
hearing.
Motion/Second: Doty/Blanchard to table this
item,'— concerning subdivision regulations, until
April of 1983.
3 ayes 0 nays
Director Johnson reviewed the situation concerning
street names in the Silver Lake Woods addition, and
reported that it appears that a renumbering of the
addresses would resolve the potential problems,
and that no building permits have been applied for
yet for the effected area.
There was discussion among the Council and members
of the audience regarding confusion over two Lake
Cmirr Drives.
Motion/Second: Hodges/Doty to direct Staff to
mo i y the building addresses on Parkview Terrace
and Parkview Drive, of the Silver Lake Woods
addition.
3 ayes 0 nays
It was decided that the issue of street names
would be further discussed at the next agenda
session.
Acting Mayor Hodges closed the regular meeting and
opened the fourth public hearing at 8:15 Fri.
6C. Ordinance N•
323 Amendi
Chapter 42, ..n-
titled "Sub-
division Regula-
tions"
r
Motion Car: '
10. Report of Direc-
tor of Public
Works/Community
Development
Motion Carried
• r1 '
Mounds View City Council
Regular Meeting
---------------------------------------------
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reviewed the proposed
request and read Resolutuion No. 1511.
Mr. Pietrowski stated he feels the property
qualifies for R-2 zoning, as the lots are 120'
wide.
Planning Commissioner Warren advised the Council
that the Met Council is hearing proposals now
regarding noise and the construction of homes near
airports, and asked if that might affect this
construction.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley replied any regulations
concerning noise will not go into effect until the
Master Plan !-as been adopted by the Met Council.
Acting Mayor Hodges closed the public hearing and
reopened the regular meeting at 8:21 PM.
November 8, 1982
Page Five
---------------------
There was discussion regarding the use of insula-
tion and how helpful it might be in noise abatement.
Motion/Second: Doty/Blanchard to adopt Resolution
00. 1511, approving Planning Case 115-82, for a
_ minor subdivision, and waive the reading of the
resolution.
3 ayes 0 nays
Motion/Second: Doty/Hodges to have the first read-
ing Ordinance No. 325, amending the municipal
code of Mounds View by amending Chapter 41 entitled
"Specific Rezoning".
3 ayes 0 nays
Clerk/Administrator Pauley read Ordinance No. 325.
Acting Mayor Hodges closed the regular meeting and
opened the fifth public hearing at 8:27 PM.
There were no comments from the audience regarding
this request.
Acting Mayor Hodges closed the public hearing and
reopened the regular meeting at 8:28 PM.
Acting Mayor Hodges reported the Planning Commission
has approved Resolution No. 65-82, approving reloca-
tion of the building.
There was discussion regarding sewer and water ser-
vices provided to the lot, and who Mrs. Wille would
be hooking up with, and what she had been assessed
for already, and by whom. Attorney Meyers recommended
6D. Subdivision and
Rezoning of
8495 Red Oak
Drive
Motion Carried
Motion Carried
6E. Relocation of
Building Request
for 7911 Spring
Lake Road
Mounds View City Council
Regular Meeting November 8, 1982
----------------------- Page Six
checking with Spring Lake Park to see if they would
be willing to handle the services, as well as seeing
if there was a joint powers agreement.
Director Johnson advised they have not been able to
find any type of agreement in the files, nor have
they discussed yet on how to collect for the services.
Motion/Second: Hodges/Doty to adopt the Planning
Commis-ss Resolution No. 65-82, approving the
relocation of a single family residence onto property
located at 7911 Spring Lake Road.
3 ayes 0 nays
Clerk/Administrator Pauley stated that Staff would
research the services question further.
Director Johnson reported the consultant will be 10
meeting with the Council at the next agenda session,
to discuss the water treatment study,
Director Johnson presented the Council with a
status report on the Storm Water Management Plan.
Director Johnson asked for Council approval of an
invoice received from Dawson Construction, for
repair work they had done in the City. He advised
the bill was less than what had originally been
estimated, and that he would be presenting a final
report on the project once all the bills were in.
Motion/Second: Doty/Blanchard to authorize payment
to in t�hesamountsofu$6,054,00, withrthefunds
v8to be
paid out of the SWM fund.
3 ayes 0 nays
Director Johnson reported several calls have been
received from
erroneous billil ngsfor etheir nthird yquarter ewater
bills, and that one of the meters in question had
been found to be in error. He stated he would be
presenting the Council with a more thorough report
at the next agenda session.
Director Johnson reported he is in the process of
reviewing applications received for the public
works/maintenance position, and will be submitting
his recommendation to the Council on November 22.
Motion/Second: Doty/Blanchard to file the letter
receive from the Ramsey Soil and Water Conservation
District with the Wetlands Ordir ce and Flood Plain
Ordinance materials that are 0• -ord.
r�
Motion Carried
Report of Di
of Public W
Community
Development
(Cont.)
a
,J
y
b
Motion Carried
3 ayes 9 nays
Mounds View City Council November 8, 1982
Regular Meeting Page $even
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Director Johnson reported a water break had occurred
over the weekend on the northwest corner of Red Oak
Drive and Woodcrest, and that while the repairs had
been completed, they had experienced quite a bit of
trouble with the equipment breaking down,
Director Johnson reported the situation has not
changed with the contractor cleaning the ditch, and
recommended sending copies of all correspondence to
the bonding company.
Attorney Meyers reported Mark Carney would be attend- 11. Report of
ing the November 22 meeting in his place. Attorney
Councilmember Blanchard reported she had received 12. Reports of
the Ramsey County League of Local Governments Councilmembers
would be meeting at the Venetian Inn on November
17, at 7:30 PM, to discuss Ramsey County legisla-
tive programs, and urged people to attend.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley pointed out that it
would be a good time to bring up to the officials
when they will be taking the municipal courts out
of the Cities.
Councilmember Doty reported there was a possible
violation of the wetlands ordinance due to filling
at County Road H2 and Silver Lake Road, on the north
side, and suggested it be investigated.
Acting Mayor Hodges reported he had received a com-
plaint from a home owner regarding a water meter
deposit and asked Clerk/Administrator Pauley to ter''
contact the individual and clarify it for him. dog'
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported he had received 13. Report of
a letter from Robert Dunn, of the Minnesota State Administrator
Waste Management Board, regarding.the letter of
complaint the City had sent him, and that Mounds
View is now on their mailing list. He added there
will be a public information meeting at Blaine Sr.
High School on November 17, at 7 PM.
Motion/Second: Doty/Blanchard to adjourn the 14. Adjournment
meeting at : 5 PM.
3 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Respectfully submitted,
Donald F, Pauley
Clerk/Administrator
DATE APPROVED: 11/8/82
PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
` RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA
1(� Canvassing Board Meeting
November 3, 1982
Mounds View City Hall
2401 Hwy. 10, Mounds View City I1111
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Acting Mayor Forslund called the meeting 1. CALL TO ORDER
to order at 7:00 p.m. on November 3, 1982.
Members present: Acting Mayor Forslund, 2. ROLL CALL
Councilmembers Hodges, Doty, and Blanchard
Others present: Clerk/Administrator Pauley
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reviewed the 3. RESOLUTION NO. 1510,
results of the November 2, 1982 General RESOLUTION CANVASSING
Election and the information contained in ELECTION RESULTS OF TH!
Resolution No. 1510. NOVEMBER 2, 1982
GENERAL ELECTION
Motion/Second: Forslund/Doty to refer the
results for the Mayor and Councilmember
positions back to the Election Judges for a
recomputation of the ballots. (Explanatory
note: The reason for the motion was to clear
up what appeared to be more ballots counted
than were actually cast.) After discussion
of the manner in which the ballots are counted
and reported and the fact that the ballots are
in the possession of the Ramsey County Elections
office and any recount would need to be performed
by Ramsey County, Councilmember Doty withdrew
his second and Councilmember Forslund withdrew
her motion.
Motion/Second: Doty/Forslund to adopt
Resolution No. 1510, Resolution Canvassing
Election Results of the November 21 1982
General Election and to waive the reading of
the resolution.
4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Motion/Second: Doty/Hodges to adjourn at 4. ADJOURNMENT
7:28 p.m.
4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
fu
Administra
DATE APPROVED: 11/8/82
PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA
h Regular Meeting
October 25, 1982
6 6. Edgewood Community Resource Center
Mounds View, MN 55112
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The hounds View City Council was called to order 1. Call to Order
by Mayor McCarty at 7:30 PM.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Councilmembers Forslund, Blanchard, 2. Roll Call
Doty, Hodges and Mayor McCarty.
ALSO PRESENT: City Attorney Meyers, Clerk/
A mini istrator Pauley and Public Works/Community
Development Director Johnson,
Mayor McCarty closed the regular meeting and opened 3. Public Hearing
the public hearing at 7:31 PM. Cable TV
Jerry Skelly, chairman of the Cable TV Committee
in Mounds View, explained that the Mounds View
Cable Committee had been formed two and a half
years ago, and after some assessment, had joined
the North Suburban Cable Commission. Mr. Skelly
introduced the members present of Group W, a
subsidiary of Westinghouse Corporation, Roger
Frank, Bob Klucas, Ron Abrahms, Dave Lebedof, and
Tom Creighton.
Mr. Frank presented Mayor McCarty with a check
for $1500, to cover the cost of the publication of
the ordinance, as required by the charter. He
gave some background on Group W, explaining that
they are the third largest provider of cable
services in America, and the largest in Minnesota,
and then played a video presentation, explaining
the proposed cable system.
All members of the audience were given a brochure,
explaining the system and answering questions on
it, and Mr. Skelly and the members of Group W
were asked many questions, to which they provided
answers.
They explained that the system is promised for the
entire nine suburbs within 18 months, with some
of those suburbs being operational in twelve
months, from the time of approval by the Minnesota Cable
Board, which is expected on November 18. The
dividing line in Mounds View for the two time
periods is County Road I. The lines will be both
underground and above ground, depending upon the
topography, with approximately 20% being underground.
Mounds View City Council October 25, 1982
Regular Meeting Page Two
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The rates for the system will he guaranteed for
three years after certification of the system,
and then the consumers are somewhat guaranteed
of reasonable prices due to the competitiveness
of the market.
Mayor McCarty expressed concern with pornography
possibly'being passed through. It was explained
that Chanel 5 is regulated by the State, and that
while the franchise authority has no control over
what is passed through, they do have the autho-
rity to control what is broadcast in the City.
There was discussion regarding the requirement
that use be given to any group, without dis-
crimination, of free access chanels, and the
City's concern over controlling pornography.
It was noted that Group W would support the
City if the City was sued for stopping porno-
graphy, and would use their insurance bonds,
and letters of credit, as back-up. It was
noted there is a lock -out available for the
tv's, and that while there is no adult chapel
currently available, the City can add programs
as others are deleted, and the City would have
to consent to the choice of programs.
It was noted that a converter will be required
for each tv set that is to be hooked up to
cable, and the additional cost for each set is
$2.95. Also, 5% of the franchise fee for all
gross revenues will go to the City, with the
FCC requiring that the funds be spent on cable
related activity, with this 5% being in addition
to the $225,000 grant Group W is providing the
City.
Two studios are planned for the area, with one
being at the Fairview Community Center in Rose-
ville and the other hopefully at the Edgewood
Community Resource Center in Mounds View, with
workshops to be conducted to train people on
the use of the video equipment, so that anyone
who is interested can learn how to operate and
produce a program.
It is felt the marketplace will support the
industry, and Group W will be in on the new
technology as it occurs. The ordinance is
written so that if the cable system should
go bankrupt, it can be removed from the City.
Repair procedures were explained, and the
controls governing them.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley brought up that
the while the public works building was not
Mounds View City Council October 25, 1982
Regular Meeting Page Three
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
originally listed for connection into the system,
Group W has agreed to connect it at no charge.
It was also noted that the City can add or delete
connections at any time.
Mayor McCarty thanked everyone involved for their
time and effort on the cable tv system. He closed
the public hearing and reopened the regular meeting
at 8:45 PM.
Motion/Second: Forslund/Hodges to approve the
Octo er , 982 minutes as corrected.
5 ayes 0 nays
Motion/Second: Hodges/Doty to approve the
October 18, 1982 minutes as corrected.
5 ayes 0 nays
There were no residents requests or comments from
the floor.
Motion/Second: Blanchard/Forslund to approve the
consent agenda as presented and waive the reading
of the resolutions.
5 ayes 0 nays
Motion/Second: McCarty/Forslund to amend the
previous motion and pull Item I for special atten-
tion.
5 ayes 0 nays
Mayor McCarty noted that the money that will be
saved by the City by having volunteers do the work of
supervising the skatinq rinks will be put in a special
fund to be used for that park. lie added he thought it
was an excellent program and deserved attention.
Motion/Second: McCarty/Blanchard to adopt Reso-
lution No. 1506 and waive the reading.
5 ayes 0 nays
4. Approval of
Minutes:
October 11, 198
and October 18,
1982
Notion Carried
Motion Carried
5. Residents Re-
quests and
Comments from
the Floor
6. Approval of
Consent Agenda
Motion Carried
Motion Carried
Motion Carried
Mounds View City Council October 25, 1982
Regular Meeting Page Four
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Motion/Second: McCarty/Forslund to approve the 7. First Readi'
rat reading of Ordinance No. 319, an ordinance, of Ordinan, a.
including addendum with exhibits, granting a 319
franchise to Group W Cable of the North Suburbs,
Inc., a Minnesota corporation, to operate and
maintain a cable communication system in the
City, setting forth conditions accompanying the
grant of'franchsie, providing for regulation and
use: of the system, and prescribing penalties for
the violation of its provisions, and waive the
entire reading.
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Attorney Meyers advised that page 20, section 7
should be revised to add the Mounds View City
Hall and Maintenance Building.
Motion/Second: Doty/Blanchard to amend the
ranc ise or finance on page 20 to add the
Maintenance Building.
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Clerk/Administrator Pauley explained this ordi- 8. First ReadJ1__ of
nance will revise Chapter 107 to include gambling Ordinance l 32
devices, raffles and bingo. Amending the Hun
cipal Code of
Motion/Second: Hodges/Forslund to approve the Mounds View by
irstF reading of Ordinance No. 326 and waive Amending Chapter
the reading. 107, Entitled
"Bingo"
4 ayes 1 nay
Motion Carried
Councilmember Doty stated he had voted against the
motion because, while State law allows gambling
by non-profit organization, he personally does not
feel it is beneficial.
Dave nrl i.
.-11 pres2nteu the Cuuncil with the monthly
9. ThirdQuarter
report for September. He reported the Department
Department Head
has applied to send officers to the breathalizer
Reports - Police
school in January. He also reported that evalua-
Department
tions had just been completed and they hope to
continue doing them on a six month basis.
Officer Brick reported they are in the process of
setting up a CPR course for the department, and
some maintenance employees have expressed an
interest in participating.
Officer Brick explained that emphasis has been
put on going back to the residential streets
rather than traffic enforcement. He reported
burglaries are down 50%, while DWI's are up over
Mounds View City Council October 25, 1982
Regular Meeting Page Five
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
last year, with total calls being up over 200
over last year.
Motion/Second: Doty/Hodges to approve Resolution 10, Consideration c
713T1 , requesting Ramsey County implement public Resolution No.
safety actions upon request of City Council 1507 Requesting -
only. Ramsey County
Implement Publi
5 ayes 0 nays Safety Actions
upon Request of
City Council On
Motion/Second: McCarty/Forslund to approve the it
policy procedure, as presented by Staff in the
October 21, 1982 memo, and the 1983 specs for the
City Newsletter.
5 ayes 0 nays
Motion/Second: Doty/Hodges to approve Ordinance 12
J907TTU amending the municipal code of Mounds View
by amending Chapter 26, entitled "Public
Improvements", and waive the reading.
5 ayes 0 nays
Clerk/Administrator Pauley explained the ordinance.
Motion/Second: McCarty/Forslund that the Council
a d i� n the verbage after a public hearing, "as
provided in Chapter 8 of the Home Rule Charter".
5 ayes 0 nays
Director Johnson reported he had received a call
from TKDA, advising they are ready to present
the I&I study report.
Kotion/Second: McCarty/Doty to set a time at the
Lovem 0aeenda session for the TKDA presen-
tation.
Motion Carried
Consideration o
Staff Memorandu.
Regarding the
1983 Specifica-
tions for the
City Newsletter
Motion Carried
First Reading o:
Ordinance No. 3:
Amending the
Municipal Code <
Mounds View by
Amending Chaptei
26, Entitled
"Public Improve-
ments"
Motion Carried
Motion Carried
13. Report of Direct
of Public Works/
Community Develo
ment
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carries
Mounds View City Council October 25, 1982
Regular Meeting Page Six
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Director Johnson advised there are problems with the
lift station that has already been repaired. He
stated he will be investigating further, and wanted
to alert the Council that repairs could be very
expensive and may have to be done on an emergency
basis. He added he would keep the Council posted.
Attorney Meyers had no report. 14. Report of
Attorney
Councilmember Forslund had no report. 15. Reports of
Councilmembers
Councilmember Blanchard had no report.
Councilmember Doty reported the National Guard
has tried to rescue the digger that is sinking on
County Road I but were not successful.
Councilmember Hodges reported he had attended
the Youth Services Bureau meeting, and that
Arden Hills has joined the group. He reported
they are working for United Way funding. He
added he has reports on the cases handled by
the Bureau for anyone who would like to review
them.
Mayor McCarty requested a memo explaining the
duties of the liason to the Youth Service
Bureau, for discussion at the next agenda session.
Mayor McCarty reported there will be a public hearingg
November 4 of the Metropolitan Council Physical Develop-
ment Committee to discuss the subject of the proposed
amendment to the sanitary sewer system in New Brighton
and Mendota Ileights.
Mayor McCarty reported he had attended the suburban
rate authority hearing, where he recommended that
all member Cities separate their MWCC charges from
their City charges, which was received very well.
Mayor McCarty questioned why the water is still
cloudy in parts of the City, after the flushing
has been done. Director Johnson reported they
can check on the volume of water being pumped,
but it is felt they overworked the system during
the summer, and will have to perform extensive
maintenance on the wells this fall. He added
they hope to locate the problems and take care
of them by spring. Mayor McCarty suggested
meeting with consultants to discuss airators.
Director Johnson reported that two part time
employees will be ending their employment with
the City in the next two weeks. pe added they
Mounds View City Council
Regular Meeting
--------------------------------------
October 25, 1982
Page Seven
--------------------------
n are advertising for a full time person, and he
hopes to have a recommendation for the Council
soon, as they will be short handed during the
next few weeks.
Motion/Second: McCarty/Doty that Council direct
to to prepare the options available to discuss
at the next agenda session, including the possi-
bility of outside contractors, to achieve the
servicing of the airators and water filters or
other necessary work to resolve the water
problem.
5 ayes 0 nays
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported he had con- 16
tacted Don Busch regarding a meeting with the
Spring Lake Park Council on the signalization
on Highway 10, but he had not heard back from
him yet.
Mayor McCarty noted that Director Johnson will
be appraising the Council on a weekly basis of
the status of the storm water management plan.
Motion/Second: Forslund/Hodges to adjourn the 17
meeting at :40 PM.
5 ayes 0 nays
Motion Carried
Report of
Administrator
Adjournment
Motion Carried