HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packets - 1983/03/28CITY COUNCIL MEETING
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
6:30 p.m. - City Council -Planning Commission Work Session Regarding
Proposal of Tony Poppelaars
March 28, 1983
7:30 p.m.
A G E N D A
1. Call to order
2. Roll Call - Blanchard, Doty, Linke, Hankner, McCarty
3. Approval of Minutes: March 14, 1983 (Regular Meeting)
(Received above in your 3/21/83 packet.)
4. Public Hearing - 7:40 p.m. - 1983 Water and Sewer Utility
Budgets and Rates
5. Residents Requests and Comments from the Floor
------------------------------------------------
CITIZENS: BEFORE SPEAKING PLEASE GIVE YOUR
FULL NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE MINUTES
------------------------------------------------
6. Approval of Consent Agenda
ITEM A. Approve Resolution No. 1576 Opposing the Identification
of Fridley Site A as a Hazardous Waste Processing Area
ITEM B. Accept Certificates of Insurance from Non -Intoxicating
Liquor Licensees
ITEM C. Approve Resolution No. 1579 Approving the Appointment of
Linda Meyer as a Regular Part Time City Employee
ITEM D. Approve Resolution No. 1580 Commending James Benjamin
Crowl, III for Achieving Eagle Scout Status
ITEM E. Approve Resolution No. 1581 Commending Jeffrey Albert
Crowl for Achieving Eagle Scout Status
ITEM F. Approve Resolution No. 1582 Commending Matthew Joseph
Seidl for Achieving Eagle Scout Status
ITEM G. Approve Resolution No. 1583 Commending Gregory Donald
Worden for Achieving Eagle Scout Status
-continued-
AGENDA
March 28, 1983
Page Two
6. Approval of Consent Agenda (cont.)
ITEM H. Approve Resolution No. 1587 Authorizing Clerk -Administrator
and Mayor to Execute Development Agreement No. 83-56
with Mermaid Supper Club
ITEM I. Licenses for Approval
ITEM J. Approve Resolution No. 1586 Approving Just and Correct
Claims Against City Funds
7. Consideration of Tony Poppelaars Wetland Alteration Permit for
Lots 1 and 2, Block 2, Park View Terrace
8. Consideration of Extension of Edgewood Square Development
Agreement
9. Acknowledge Receipt of Notification of Appointment of Sergeant
Timothy Smith as Acting Police Chief by Civil Service Commission
10. Consideration of Police Department Memorandum Regarding Community
Service Officer Program
11. Report of Director of Public Works/Community Development
12. Report of Attorney
13. Report of Councilmembers
14. Report of Administrator
15. Adjournment
("AWY
Cof of vounjg lei
RAMSEY COUNTY. MINNESOTA
2401 HIGHWAY 10
MOUNDS VIEW. MINN. 55112
7Sa3055
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
NOTICE OF HEARING
1983 WATER & SEWER UTIT,ITY BUDGETS
Notice is hereby given that the' Council of the City of
Mounds View will meet on Monday, March 28, 1983 at 7:40 p.m.
at the City Hall, 2401 Highway 10,'Mounds View, Minnesota, to
consider the 1983 Water and Sewer Utility Budgets and ratcn.
Citizens may express their views on the budgets either orally
or in writing.
Donald F. Pauley
Clerk -Administrator
(Bulletin: March 17, 1983)
RESOLUTION NO. 1584
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF SO
STATE OF MINNENNf•.SOTA
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE 1983 WATER AND SEWER
SYSTEMS MAINTENANCE AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
WHEREAS, Mounds View City staff has prepared and presented
a report entitled,"1983 Water and Sewer Systems Maintenance and
Capital Improvement Program"; and
WHEREAS, the purpose of the report was to recommend the
establishment of a long-term maintenance program for the City's
Water and Sewer Utility Systems in order to provide high quality
utility service to the residents of the community at the most
reasonable cost possible; and
WHEREAS, it was felt that such a goal could be achieved
by implemcntinq a mai-ntPnance program which keeps the systems in
optimum working order and extends the useful life of the systems;
and
WHEREAS, the report included the following recommendations:
A. Water System and Fund
1. Set water rates at a level sufficient to ensure
that annual sales revenues cover annual operating
costs, depreciation of 'equipment purchased with own
funds, and contingency.
am
an
2 Establishnual
ofl$42',500etorberh
funded out
of non -sales revenues.
3. Establish a Capital Improvement Program during the'
period .1983-85 at an estimated cost of $328,800
to be funded with cash -on -hand in the Water System
Contribution Fund and an interfund loan from the
Special Capital Projects Fund to be repaidAfrfm
Water Fund non -sales revenues over a Pe____
ten (10) years at 88 interest per annum.
B. Sewer System and Fund
1, Establish an annual inspection, maintenance and
system improvement program at an annual cost of
$33,100 to be funded by an increase in sewer rates.
RESOLUTION NO. 1584
Page Two
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the
City of Mounds View hereby accepts the report entitled, "1983
Water and Sewer Systems Maintenance and Capital Improvement Program"
and approves Cho reconmiendations contained therein.
Adopted this 28th day of March, 1983.
ATTEST:
Mayor
(SEAL)
Clerk -Administrator
V
RESOLUTION NO. 1585
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE 1983 WATER AND SEWER UTILITY
BUDGETS AND INCREASING WATER AND SEWER RATES
WHEREAS, the City Council did hold a public hearing on the
1983 Water and Sewer Utility Budgets and Rates on March 28, 1983;
and
WHEREAS, the City of Mounds View is authorized to establish
water and sewer rates; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it is necessary
that the City increase its water and sewer rates in order to meet
current operating expenses and fund the recommendations of the 1983
Water and Sewer Gystcmc Maintenance and ra.nital improvement Program.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Mounds View that:
1. The Water Utility Budget for calendar year 1983 shall
be as follows:
Water Sales
PenalLies 5 Intcrest
Connection Fees
Permits
Other Revenue
TOTAL REVENUES
Operations
Deoreciation
Contingency
Maintenance
Debt Service
TOTAL EXPENSES
INCOME
REVENUES
EXPENSES
$263,200.00
11,J00.00
3,320.00
49,000.00
750.00
$328,270.00
$229,793.00
9,52J.00
15,000.00
42,500.00
23,458.00
$320,276.00
$ 7,994.00
RESOLUTION NO. 1585
Page Two
2. Effective with the billing for the first quarter of
water consumption in 1983 the water rate will be
70C per 1,000 gallons.
3. The Sewer Utility Budget for calendar year 1983
shall be as follows:
REVENUES
Sewer Use Fees (Operations)
$530,992.00
Sewer Use Fees (Maintenance)
33,187.00
Connection Fees
500.00
Permits
450.00
Investment Income
3,500.00
Other Revenue
712.00
TOTAL REVENUES $569,341.00
EXPENSES
Operations - MWCC,
$354,754.00
Operations - City
127,377.00
Depreciation
19,600.00
Debt Service (Bonds)
13,650.00
Contingency
15,000.00
Maintenance
33,187.00
TOTAL EXPENSES $563,568.00
INCOME $ 5,773.00
4. Effective with the billing for the first quarter of
sewer usage in 1963 the sewer rate will be $29.75
per REC (Residential Equivalent Connection) per
quarter.
Adopted this 28th day of March, 1983.
ATTEST:
Mayor
(SEAL)
Clerk -Administrator
Ut�r b
CONSENT AGENDA
March 28, 1983
The Consent Agenda is a technique designed to expedite handling of
routine and misccllancoua official business of the City Council.
The entire Agenda may be adopted by the Council in one motion. The
motion for adoption is non -debatable and must receive unanimous
approval. By request of any individual Councilmember, any item can
be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed upon the Regular Agenda
for debate.
ITEM A. Adopt Resolution No. 1576-Opposing the Identification
of Fridley Site A as a Hazardous Waste Processing Area
ITEM B. Accept Certificates of Insurance from Non -Intoxicating
Liquor Licensees
ITEM C. Adopt Resolution No. 1579 - Approving the Appointment of
Linda Meyer as a Regular Part Time City Emplovee
ITEM D. Adopt Resolution No. 1580 - Commending James Benjamin Crowl, III
for Achieving Eagle Scout Status
ITEM E. Adopt Resolution No. 1581 - Commending Jeffrey Albert Crowl
for Achieving Eagle Scout Status
ITEM F. Adopt Resolution No. 1582 - Commending Matthew Joseph Seidl
for Achieving Eagle Scout Status
ITEM G. Adopt Resolution No. 1583 - Commending Gregory Donald Worden
for Achieving Eagle Scout Status
ITEM H. Adopt Resolution No. 1587 - Authorizing Clerk -Administrator
and Mayor to Execute Development Agreement No. 83-56 with
Mermaid Supper Club
ITEM I. Licenses for Approval
Carnival - May 10 thru May 15, 1983
O'Neil United Shows - New
Garbage Haulers - Expire 3/31/84
Larry s Quality Sanitation - Renewal
General - Expire 6/30/83
L & M Contractors - New
Elmer T. Peterson Construction - New
Masonry - Expire 6/30/83
Hinnenkamp Masonry - New
Other - Expire 6/30/83
M nesota Package Products (Pacific
Sewer & Water - Expire 6/30/83
K's Mechanical & Excavating - New
Pool & Patio) - New
ITEM J. Adopt Resolution No. 1586 - Approving Just and Correct Claims
Against City Funds
kkmm 6
RESOLUTION NO. 1576
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION OPPOSING THE IDENTIFICATION OF FRIDLEY
SITE A AS A HAZARDOUS WASTE PROCESSING AREA
WHEREAS, the Minnesota Waste Management Board has identi-
fied a site in the City of Fridley as a proposed hazardous waste
processing facility area; and
WHEREAS, this site, known as Fridley A, abutts the City
of Mounds View's westerly border on Pleasant View Drive from
County Road H-2 to County Road H; and
WHEREAS, the City of Mounds View has evaluated the site
as it relates to its conformance with the Waste Management Board's
"Basis for the Selection of Criteria and Selection of Areas for
Inclusion in the Proposed Inventory of Processing Areas (Twin
Cities Metropolitan Area)" dated February 24, 1983, and finds that
Fridley A in whole or in part does not conform with four of the
eight factors listed on page 23 of the aforementioned report,
namely, proximity to residential development, soil and water condi-
tions, protection of city wells and water supply intake, and
proximity to natural areas, parks, and historic sites; and
WHEREAS, a report from the Anoka County Soil and Water
Conservation District dated February.7, 1983 recommends that
Fridley A be removed from the list of proposed Hazardous Waste
Processing Facility Sites due to existing soil and water conditions
that would cause for any spill or seepage of hazardous waste
material to be disastrous to the soil and water resources of the
area.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Mounds.
View opposes the identification of Fridley A as a Hazardous
Waste Processing Area.
Adopted this 28th day of March, 1983.
ATTEST:
Mayor
(SEAL)
Cler-A<ministrator
qtY4
MEMO T0: Mayor and City Council��\L/
FROM: Clerk -Administrates
DATE: March 23, 1983
SUBJECT: LIQUOR LIABILITY INSURANCE FOR NON -INTOXICATING LIQUOR
LICENSEES
Chapter 101.03 of the Municipal Code, as amended, requires that
non -intoxicating liquor licensees provide proof of financial
responsibility as defined by Subdivision 2 of that Chapter.
Subdivision 3 requires that the City Attorney approve the form
of financial responsibility and that the City Council also approve
such form. Attached please find certificates of insurance provided
by all of the City's non -intoxicating liquor licensees as required
by Chapter 101.03 which have been reviewed by the City Attorney
and found to be acceptable. Staff would recommend Council approval
of these certificates and proof of financial responsibility as
required.
DFP/pf
Attachments
cord II�iI
I.
YAMI AN11 AI10111 SS (11 Afl Nf9
A.I,C,s„ Inc.
P. p, Ito:,, 2029
j.s t. Paul# MIN 55109
NAME AND ADDR15$ IN INSURLD
•�-r.--'M1= a""T�"r'oliin
5394 Ldg1:4iilid'Dr.
Moundsview# MN 55112
UMPANV I IVII JN INSAIIANII
Jill"
UOMPNENENSIVE FORM
PRIMISLS—OPERATIONS
(APLOSION AND COLIMSE
tAIARD
UNDI INUN111NII IMIAIID
IN 011HAIlONS 1161AREI
CnNIRACTUAL INSURANCI
UNDID IORM PliUl'tR11
DAMAGE
INDIIYNII(BI CONTRACIO
KITSONM INJURY
RMIMmUul.. ..........
❑ COMPKIIINSIV[ 1D111A
❑ ONNIV
❑ mmn
❑ NUN 01111111- E%CESS LIABILITY
❑ UNPRIILA FORM
❑ or III It I TAN UMDIN I IA
FORM _
w R%ERS'COMPENSATION
and
EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY
OTHER
A Liquor Liabil ty
:exmlTION Or OMRATIONM o1.APLI-11111E1 rs
IYII A Y 14"Mil N
GA 32688
COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGES
wNIPANI �L
_n_ininoie_FmR—Lu
r.11M1'ANY D
1111IR D
CONAWAY
11 llllr
nMl'NII D
COMPANY
maynperVln'Lha^nsmance e1N01rdded at thelP011613
LirnuO A
01 V
I AMINO,," IIAI I
1-1-84
NOWLYINJURY f
PNOPIRIYDAMAGE f
DoUltYINJURYAND
PROP[RTYDAMAG( f
cuMDIN[D
1'11150NA1 IMlI1NY
IultID Y INJURY f
II M:II All ININI
BODILY INJURY f
(I ACH ACCIDENT)
PROK111Y DAMAPE f
NUNN Y R julif AND f
IRNIP[NTY DAMAGE
COM111NIO
IWDII Y IhAIBY AND
PROPIRIYDAMAGE f
COMBINED
SIAIUI041
fubiect la
AGGREGATE
f
f
f
f
® 3 Itx.KCd
$500# Bodily Inj. 1 piers
$500# Bodily Inj. 1 Occe
ing com-
Cancellallonl Should a y 01 the
above ldt scribed days lies U noleclelo the below ne the amed cert I cration date aterholder1. but failure o
mail such notice shall impose no obligation or liabillly of any kind upon the company.
NAME AND ADVIdSSOr IT All IIFXAI( IIOL IN 11
City of Mounds View
2401 N.E. tiwye 10
New Brighton, MN 55112
DATE
--'•�11151 NIAiIVE
AMERICAN HARDWARE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
IIOMI ofIICI. - N-INNEAPOLIS.MINNESOTA •\,�1r��61]1�i/9��
CENTRAL DIVISION
p.0. DnY 435MIN1tl'-r•nOt15, MINNE501A 55440
MEMORANDUM OF INSURANCE RCl Cl✓ED
Nante Of Insmed_wuvinl'—
..Ar, enAklrC eva a MiMJEAPOLIS PIN
Project —`---
Location 2537 NE H#— 10
This is to certily that the following policies, sul'lecl to their cams, conditions and exclusions, have been issued.
TYPE OF POLICY: Scheduled NntrComprehensive Auto Liability ❑
Comprehensive Auto Liability ❑
Scheduled Non -Comprehensive General Liability ❑
Comprehensive General Liability
Odmt dean ahovc SPECIAL.-MULT3—PEgIL-
04—OIr83 �1—&e
N
Policy u.
3-2291061 Inception Date Expiration Date
Automobile Other Than Automobile
Limit of Liability:
Each Person
Bodily Injury Liability --- -
Each Occurrence
---'— �—
Aggregate
�---
Each Occurrence
Property Damage liability — "�--
Aggregate
500r00— 0
Each Occurrence
Bodily Injury & Property 500f0-- OO
Aggregate '
Damage Liability _--
Yes
No
Coverage Provided:
Ei
❑
Premises or Lessor's risk only
❑
oprml ions of Cnntt Bruit
❑
Operations of Subcontractor (contingent)
❑
Plodnets - Cumplelcd Operatiuus
for 'hold harmless agreement;
Contractual Liability to Include coverage
❑
if such agreement is contained in the specifications or subcontract.
Property damage liability covers: ❑ ❑
Damage clue to Idastirg Ex ❑
Damage due W collapse Cz ❑
Damage to underground facilities EX ❑
Broad Form coverage LIQUOR LIAB LIMIT 500t000 EX ❑
Other than above E&JES_JD-e2_SALE.S—
WORKER'S COMPENSATION: 01OIr84
Inception Date 01-01-83 E%pirationDate��—
Policy No. 3-2M23 Employer's Liability Limit S 1009000
Coverage—Wmkcr s Campensatinn, Statutory UMBRELLA LIABILITY: 04-01-84
Policy No.
3-2147361 Inception Date 04-0143 Expiration Date �—
LIMITSOF IS15f000s000 Each Occurrence IS101000 Retained limit IS 15s000e000Aggregatelimit
LIABILITY
In the event Of any material change In. o, Cinu:elappp of any of the above Voncml. 10 DAYS
ooi6e Iherepl mil he mailed to the parties to Whom Hill memos olWn is Hued.
THIS COVERAGEFICATE OF AFFORDED INSURANCE NEIT14ER AFFIRMATIVELY NOR
NEGATIVELY AMENDS, EXTENDS OR ALTERS THE
THE POLICY OR POLICIES ES TO WHICH IT PERTAINS
i
Dated
03-11-83 CF
Autb-vcU Inswanl:c Company Representative
u.,
511.1592111.791 a e�
JEJIt
Was AIN AIAXII'11 III "If" 1
COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGES
Risk Planners, Inc. ;;;YI;4; , A THE TRAVELERS INS, C 1MPpN1 S
1). 0, Box 240 .....--_--_._
Mpls,, MN 55440 ii'w_"' B_
t,IMI'AN1 —
IInt1 C
;Brook's Superette q31_
2390.1iwy`10 __—_. ❑III II
Moundsview, IIN 55112 M1•Al1Y
I milt E
1N11 lu[Imlly lhtl pouues ulmwuluebuen lANow NarX h.nn,dd to the mlulod flamed above alxlalamforce al lAS lime Noour Politics lnyrWuuemenL lumw 10 All Ill
of AN YOUIMct or ulteI Jlxunlunl wnN Ievlxn l to itlluh Inn fmleNale may bX issued or may,arlxnl, Ilm n1lu n" AIIoNW M Ilw plNiulal eaulued Aaf10 U Iublrl W all RIM
coul-Ahn
IIN UI 1161111Afl1,
11 If N Y NIIMIII II
+--
--CENEflAL LIABILITY
----
PIAI:aMI'NIN111sid JOIN
TND173T481-4-82
A
I...I polidD15 fJ'lllAl Xlle,
ri1 UNUa IN ANTI 4.011 AVIA
l"'1 IRA/Ala
I..I IINUIIIIIMIDNn IIA/Autl
PIPAR1111M 1111,041110
o NIMIA,m. IIA/ARIA
lJ] I.UNIIIACIuAI InURAIA.I
�NUMMU IURM IWWl lilt
DAMAIil
thin NNUINI 1.11111 N66 I'll,
1•III'0IN04 INXIIIY
x flcalnShoo.Li
ility--- �--
I arpul IIth%lyl IIUIM
061111)
IIIIX II
NUN I1n11f U
hitN:Y
I AI.1101 NM UAII
- --_
----•
---Room Y Major
(ACH
III:CUIMINcr
AGGNIGJ
1
12-31-83
MIUP[Nir GAYAriI
1
i
IMIIIII Y INJURY ANII
L 500
PMH'tRJJUAMACiJ
1500
I
CUMBRIA II
I J UMIINIIRA IUIIM
❑ UIHIP6MNIIMtl11(IIA
I IUIM ..
WOflKENS'COMPENSAI ION--__ -
And
A EMPLOYERS'IIAOILITY TV0UB159T250-8_82.____ . 7-1-:
OTHER
sl:mrlh,nw lll'IMILIN:IIA.AIMiI,:4l II1Jli
Same as above
INI ."NA1 INJURY
MIMI Y IN nuuKunNINMNiIsIloIlI"NInY
JEACII AMIN
I•IXIP1111 Y bAMALIIS
IN)1111 IINIIIHY AIIP 1
I'IXII'I NII OAMAGI
1 500
Idllll Y INJURY AND
I'NUPl III r UAMAGI 5 i
CUMNINW
%IAIIIIUIN
f
l IhA• to
(test pnhues he cancellHd Ielole the expiration date thereof, the issuing corn-
CanctlllatlGn; Shaul) ,Iny u
parry will en"lilt IN mad id red
notice to llte below named certificate holder, but failure to
mail such uuhce shall Impose no obligation or llubddy at any kind upon 11 le company.
hplK__ ._.... _ ..---. ..._.__.._._.....
jU'GXI(� II/MI AIa AIIIIIU S: .0 All lxl&lu UA11155U1U.------
City of Moundsview /
`-'W,AI"ix`":'!}F±(�+!!r'4`'.:1... ,. �.; .:J71•... �•a,ul,.n•Il'A'!I;Y V^.{M.91Me
me
UAAII AND ADDRESS of AI:LNCY
Nor•I,h bl„•1,;,,, Al;cncir.:;, Inc.
INSURANCE SUIVICE CI N I I.It
2601 COON RAPIDS It0(IL1VARD
COON RAPIDS, MINNLSO'IA 55433
.1All n LJiG il)tiS of INSUINIU—
�14`Rti Inc,
-Fndnr!.e:.Enterprisgs,. ,
C/U raul & Jurdoil Fudor
5491 Adams Street
bloundsview, MN* 55112 / ! /J ,4r
Typo and Location or Property
P
R
0
P
E
It
T
Y
Type or Insurance
L 0 Comprehensive Form
I n Scheduled Form
A I 0 Premises/Operations
8 ❑ PfodUC15/Completed Operations
I ❑ Contractual
L Li um• LiDbilil.y
I m Other (speedy below) Q Pr
T e^ $ e<m
0 Med. Pay. S pane A,c
Y OPersonal Injury _— _---- —
�ed' 0 Liability 0 Non-own❑Hired
T OComprehenswe-Deductible $
0 LJ Collislon.Deduchblc $
0 0 Medical Payments
8 I L]Uninsured Motorist $
I n No fault (specify):
L j 0 Other (specify):
I
l
— Statutory Limits (specify staes
CI WORKERS' COMPENSATION below)
162
COMPANY (ol,unlNia CnnunlLy Company
March 1, L
EllnClwe i.':01 ;inn 19 83
Lppues -12.01 Bill March 30, _`_
r 0 This Under is issued to extend coverage in the above n
company per expiring Policy 4 (eapl at wed ql")
Description or Operation/Vehicles/Property
pram Shop I.i;NbLlity
Coverage/Porils/Fo-- rm� _ Aml of Imurann Ded.
Coverage/Forms
A ❑8 0C
Injury $
ty
le �
Injury &
ly Damage
nbined
Personal Injury
...1-1 .--
Injury (Each Occurrence) $
Damage $
Injury 8 Properly Damage
Combined $
0 EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY — Limit $
SPECIALCONDITIONS/OTHER COVERAGES Injury each person
LigLEor Liability — Limits: $lU0 000 Bodily injury each common cause
$100,000 Property Damage each ns of oruse
tmon each acommon cause
$100,000 Loss of tint) nno Loss of Means of Support aggregate
MDN1GAOLE
❑ LOSS PAYEE [3 ADD L INSURED
.AAII. AND ADDRESS W O
LOAN tiuAIULN
b ed Representative ve Date
Jy'vlalLire of Authoet
..
Authorized by John H. Crowther, Inc.
REPLY MESSAGE
.TO: . City of Moundsview-_____`-___--
Attnt Pat
-2-IF01 Hwy. 10
Moundsview MN 55112 —
COMMERCIAL & PERSONAL INS. SERVICES
P.O. Box 459
Hastings, Minnesota 55033
(012) 437.0377
rTom Thumb /% 110� ? -UATE:-_.2-14-83--
SUBJECT:,----- — — -- - ----
HLOt lease be advised that too- t&-%t _
Per our telephone conversation of this morningl�
of 7T05 ft0jjW 4d AxiYa.—Mince lie, NAf�-T9�_Thumb�torQ_ 11O,�s__indegd
--
PLEASE REPLY TO Julie Winter
REPLY
SIGNET)
G e NO 6072
THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER.
THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDEDUY THE POLICIES LISTED. BELOW.
Commercial &
Personali COMPANIESe'eCOVERAGES
• ,dJl'l.rr•
Hastings, MN 55033 Kemper
B -
iIPW —
-�—
I
Tom Thum¢ Food Markets, Inc. K & P Co., Inc. rlrnH C
P & K Co., Polka Dot Dairy, Inc. MI•Arr• D
110 E. 17th St. ILJpII -
Hastings, MN 55033 JAPAN, E
:ITIIII
This is to certify that poh[Ies of insurance lifted below ha.P been issued to the Insured named abmei;�i�aie In force at this time. Nolwilhslandmggany requirement, term or CO
of any conlma or other document with mSINNt to whnll Ibis M•tldKalP may Im! psutd or may I•YIam, 11w rnswance afforded by the policies,nrlditidl
de bed herem is subject to all the
lemn, eM:luslons and (ondltlmR of such pdaes
A Ar Ij Limits of Liability In Thousands
unn, 7.1 uI IN TRAN,I I Irlm,!nir.11,lr, I IquminN VATi _ .—I,,.. eel..... AGGREGATE
A I M.l LOMIWDII NSIVI IONM
❑
Pll[MISIS-OPERATIONS
•
❑IAPIOSION
AND COLIAI5I
IMIARD
i
❑
UNhJ1h.Im0ND IIAIAR0
❑
PRODUCTS COMIY IT ED
•
nolCmnNC J41ARb
I
CONTRACTUAL tNSURANC[
l❑''I
BROAD FORM PROPIIPY
I 1
I I
IMGI MA
IND(P[NI)INI CONTRA HIPS
`.J
I'IIISONA1 INAIIIY
❑COMPRI RI NSIVI FORM
❑ BANTU
❑ TRED
❑ NONONN(O
UMBRELLA FORM
OIHERTHAN UMBRELLA
FORM
and
EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY
a11F-6=14
l4D1111 Y INJURY
3
6-1-83
500
PROPI01V DAMAGE
a
100
RODII V IN AIRY AND
PI![1P[ReYDAMAGI
I (
COMIIInFD
All Minnesota Locations of Tom Thumb Stores.
(Corporate Owned Only)
I-ifin AI INJURY
tlOVIlY INJURY E
1(ACN P[RSONI
BOOIIY INJURY 3
IEACN ACCIpENif
VWJP[IIIYDAMAGI 3
BOOBY INJURY AND
PPpP[RTY pAMAGC 3
BODILY INJURY AND
PROPERTY DAMAGE a
COMBINED
51ATUTOR
a
3
500
3 100
s
I
f
Cancellatlon: Should any of the above described policies be cancelled before the expiration date thereof. the issuing com-
pany will endeavor to mad In days written notice to the below named certificate holder, but failure to
mail such notice shall Impose no obligation or liablhtyof any kind upon thecompany.
City of Mounds View
Ramsey County
2401 Highway 10
Mounds View, M 55112
DATE ISSUED
i
I
1--2.'A
,CORD 25
NAME AND ADDRISS OF AGINCY
Fred S: James & Company of MN
2901 Metro Drive
Suite 314�,
Bloomington, PIN 55420
NAME AN,, ADUII, Is BE ""Bio
Jon Boy, Inc. IV
2408 County Road I "✓
Moundsview, PIN
(hs,st cee,* lhatpoin,es of Insurance listed blow have Lech Issued to the insure
of any cal l of other doiunuNll wdll leMxN t to wledl the AefLLwle nay be is'
terms, exclusions and conditions of such policies
CIIMI'ANr IYN 01 INGIJRANI I COINI N",PI111,
EIIIN
GENERAL LIABILITY
❑COMPRI,ll N57vl WIVA
❑ PpEMlsfs-OPERA) IONS
❑(IPIOSIOR ANTI COIIANI
❑AJIIA m
ONRN:IIODNO IIAYAND
❑ PRDOUCTWOMIN rTLD
❑
OPERATIONS IIAJAND
CONTRACIUAI INSURANCE
❑IINOAD rONM PINIPr E1JY
IIAMAm
1❑1,11
IN1111'Ih111N1 LONTRAIAIR
u1'IRSONAt INJ111D
IAUTOMOBILE LIABILITY
1 /I ❑ CoMPRIIRNSII'I 1'014M
ffi✓✓✓ ❑ DONm
❑I-
I�II1 I1111111
lMIN W.NI II
UMBRELIA IORM
DARN I IIAN UMMILLLA
I BEIM
COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGES
I'IIMI'ANI
A Ideal Mutual Insurance Company
,nuP
I IIMI'ANY
anal ------
,.,,
COMPANY E
Lf ITIN
ned shore and are In I: Willi lhatarAing any repuirerni term Of mndi90n
or may irvaul, BiC insurance allorded by [Ile Poll, C$ ounbed herein If subletl to IB UN
LIMITS Of LIADII ty is ouHn f
WL ILY -- lACll AGGREGATE
IAPIRAIIDN IIAIf OCCURRENCE
000I1Y INJURY 1 1
I'ROPERIY DAMAGE 1 S
BOBBY INJURY AND
PROPI Try DAMAGE 1 1
COMBINED
PERSONAL INJURY 9
BOBBY INJURY 1
(E AC H Pf RSONI
BODILY INJURY 1
(EACH ACCIDENT)
1110)PERTY DAMAGE 1
8I101,Y INJURY AND 1
PIIOPEIHY DAMAGE
COMBINED
BODILY INJURYAND
PROPERTY DAMAGE 1 1
COMBINED
STATUTORY
and y
EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY
OTHER 7,000each personA iquor Liabilit GA82-8710 6-15-83 ch accident
FIFY
:RIPTION Or OPERATIONS40CATIONSNEHICLES
Designated Premises Only
Cancellation: Should any of the above desulbed policies be cancelled before the expiration date thereof, the issuing com-
pany will endeavor to mail _ days written notice to the below named certificate holder, but failure to
mail such notice shall impose no obligation or liability of any kind upon the company.
...I,Y 4NL11
NAME ANTI A110111 SS OI 1'I 1101 R'Al l 1101 D111
City of Moundsview
2401 Hwy. 10
Moundsview, MN 55112
DAIS ISSUED .March I—
ACORD 25 (1.79)
Cotlific(:111.2 oil IIIS•ili'':'I1CC
C. P.A.I I OF 11.1 CI 1441I7ti C9:11,si l) ••ii! 141 PIOHIS UPON lift Cl RTIIIC All h0;01R,
n'S r:• •''•='i .. e.r!,VID, LRIIIiD GI Fl ilr. iil[ COLT RAGE AIIOL:iID BY IHI POIICIIS LISTED BELOW,
:XA:;DER 6 OF TEXAS, lix. COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGES
:.',:MONU Sli/tMkOCt; '1CF�F.R ((IMIANr
'•Lit 'r14FOR, LACK YA>: AS Inn A 7:MERICAN MOTORIST INSURANCE CO,
'+i IAS, TF.1.AS 75201 ul'il , A"' „
aB CFt%fi(AL NATIONAL INSURANCE C01•PANY
_ nP N1911If (N INfUgD_— _-- --
00.1ANY C
_ y
'r T'l.-
11111R
7";-10;
�i:: SOU17flARD
1333-16779 (7-Eleven Store)
=.'8 NORTIL HASL;F.LL AVE.
FEII AVE.
7295 Silver Lake Road
_A.S, TEXAS 75204
Younds View, Minn,
n In'Mil fte o:2ios Dl i'IlnlluH Lnr! IA,. lu., 1.+. ....A it �!w nd rx r.nd
1 f -
Ilan lv,d a tin 6,•of IWsDm1 Nm.ilhunnd,nd nn(rpuNN96is temYN
ih
vq u.ANntl nr MLrr hx urrNnl .BI. rr•1.'u In -1,,, II Uul r. n•Lu,N Yen. IN mnr.d m uu( Lnuin, TIN immoaR allmded by IF., dnuil+d Main it
vo,.Jmiom Nrrd twrdbum Ill wl). ,a`Lr nl.
)slain mEj.a to all Ih
1..11
-------_.—
limits o Liability In Thousands (000) "
..ANY
1YI1 of MSURINCI M.r'Y N';rv111
IaKr —I--
-.
^GENERAL
OCCU-11KI AGGIILAII
LIABILITY
IODI1nrrJDlr 1 300, 1 300,
C()Mr'11NINSrN 1qM
r`Dr`,,
IJ IIIMIIl1-CM'I IAIKWI
rIp111Y DAwGI 1 100, 1 100,
+ 2ZM621 752
10-1-83
'yI�IwAMSNvu•eun
U�T GWI RRIA%AGI
(ICNIIIIISI(MISV"IVVI
rj 311
BODILY INJURY AND
C Wk.cluAt INSuIANa
JMDIIJIYDAMAGE I 1
10
L.J MIlloa c JGO
COMIINID
I7
VINIKN'S IIDAD 1044%
IJ
--
0IHI1
AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY I
g116Y INJURY
❑C
11NN NISONI 1
WHNINHv110RM
II��II
lDDI:Y INNIY
O/MlD
II ACN A((IDINI)
HnID
PSOPIPIYDAMAGI I
�L 'JI
E„J NON o"ID
DDRY INJURY AND
r1011 ICY DAMAGI i
((IMIINID
EXCESS LIABILITY
I
lo:mY nnmY AND
l(1Nr 11111NS1VI
rrarDIY DAM4c[ I 1
cAlAluaHt
COMIMID
IIAINIIY
WORKIRS' COMPENSATION
salmon
and 2CM621 752
10-1-83
EMPI OYERS' LIABILITY
•:•VAT INIURID
Cancellation: Should ony of the above described olicius be cancelled before The expiration dole thereof, the issuing
company will endeavor to mail_ 10 days written notice to the below named certificote holder, but
failure to (nail such notice shall impose no obligation or liability of any kind upon the company.
NAW AND ADDIIIS DI 1I11.14AII HDIDJA
City of Hounds View
Ramsey County, Flinnesota
2401 Highway 10
Mounds View, Minn, 55112
DAII Mule Feb. 3, 1983
JJ .�
l�
1 e A'JIMa4aDnnlll Nl,
John H. L'aarron
4tm t(')
RESOLUTION NO. 1579
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE APPOINTMENT OF LINDA MEYER
AS A REGULAR PART TIME CITY EMPLOYEE
WHEREAS, the Mounds View City Code, Chapter 6.04, defines
a regular part time employee who is one who has successfully
completed the required probationary period and who was employed
on a schedule of more than 20 and less than 40 hours per week;
and
WHEREAS, Linda Meyer has successfully completed her six
month probation period.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Mounds View does hereby appoint Linda Mayor as a
regular part time City employee.
Adopted this 28th day of March, 1983.
a
ATTEST: Mayor
(SEAL)
Clerk -Administrator .
TO: Clerk -Administrator, Don Pauley
FROM: Chief Grabowski
DATE: March 16, 1983
RE: Salary of Clerk -Typist
Linda Meyer, Clerk -Typist for the Police Department, has satisfactorily
completed the six month probationary period.
U/b/m 6
RESOLUTION NO. 1580
!� CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION COMMENDING JAMES BENJAMIN CROWL, III
FOR ACHIEVING EAGLE SCOUT STATUS
WHEREAS, James Benjamin Crowl, III has worked hard and
diligently to meet the requirements for the Eagle Scout Badge; and
WHEREAS, having successfully completed those requirements
James Benjamin Crowl, III was awarded the highest honor a Boy Scout
can receive, the Eagle Scout Badge, in a special ceremony on
March 20, 1983; and
WHEREAS, it is the desire of the City of Mounds View to
recognize James Benjamin Crowl, III for his outstanding accomplishment;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Mounds View on behalf of the residents of Mounds View
commends and congratulates James Benjamin Crowl, III for the signi-
ficant accomplishment of being named an Eagle Scout.
Adopted this 28th day of March, 1983.
ATTEST:
Mayor Duane McCarty
Councilmember Blanchard Councilmember Doty
Councilmember Hankner Councilmember Linke
(SEAL)
Clerk -Administrator Pauley
V, Qin2-'e5
RESOLUTION NO. 1581
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION COMMENDING JEFFREY ALBERT CROWL FOR
ACHIEVING EAGLE SCOUT STATUS
WHEREAS, Jeffrey Albert Crowl has worked hard and diligently
to meet the requirements for the Eagle Scout Badge; and
WHEREAS, having successfully completed those requirements
Jeffrey Albert Crowl was awarded the highest honor a Boy Scout
can receive, the Eagle Scout Badge, in a special ceremony on
March 20, 1983; and
WHEREAS, it is the desire of the City of Mounds View to
recognize Jeffrey Albert Crowl for his outstanding accomplishment;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Mounds View on behalf of the residents of Mounds View
commends and congratulates Jeffrey Albert Crowl for the significant
accomplishment of being named an Eagle Scout.
Adopted this 28th day of March, 1983.
ATTEST:
Mayor Duane McCarty
Councilmember Blanchard Councilmember Doty
Councilmember Hankner Councilmember Lin e
(SEAL)
Clerk -Administrator Pauley
UOI
RESOLUTION NO. 1582
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION COMMENDING MATTHEW JOSEPH SEIDL FOR
ACHIEVING EAGLE SCOUT STATUS
WHEREAS, Matthew Joseph Seidl has worked hard and diligently
to meet the requirements for the Eagle Scout Badge; and
WHEREAS, having successfully completed those requirements
Matthew Joseph Seidl was awarded the highest honor a Boy Scout
can receive, the Eagle Scout Badge, in a special ceremony on
March 20, 1983; and
WHEREAS, it is the desire of the City of Mounds View to
recognize Matthew Joseph Seidl for his outstanding accomplishment;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Mounds View on behalf of the residents of Mounds View
commends and congratulates Matthew Joseph Seidl for the significant
accomplishment of being named an Eagle Scout.
ATTEST:
Adopted this 28th day of March, 1983.
Mayor Duane McCarty
Councilmember Blanchard Councilmember Doty
Councilmember Hankner Councilmember Linke
(SEAL)
Clerk -Administrator Pauley
Ll
RESOLUTION NO. 1583
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION COMMENDING GREGORY DONALD WORDEN FOR
ACHIEVING EAGLE SCOUT STATUS
WHEREAS, Gregory Donald Worden has worked hard and diligently
to meet the requirements for the Eagle Scout Badge; and
WHEREAS, having successfully completed those requirements
Gregory Donald Worden was awarded the highest honor a Boy Scout
can receive, the Eagle Scout Badge, in a special ceremony on
March 20, 1983; and
WHEREAS, it is the desire of the ttity of Mounds View to
recognize Gregory Donald Worden for his outstanding accomplishment;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Mounds View on behalf of the residents of Mounds View
commends and congratulates Gregory Donald Worden for the significant
accomplishment of being named an Eagle Scout.
ATTEST:
Mayor Duane McCarty
Councilmember Blanchard Councilmember Doty
Councilmember Hankner Councilmember Linke
(SEAL)
Clerk -Administrator Pauley
4
RESOLUTION NO. 1587
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
41 COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CLERK -ADMINISTRATOR
AND MAYOR TO EXECUTE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
N0. 83-56 WITH THE MERMAID SUPPER CLUB
WHEREAS, Lhe Mounds View Code, Section 59.07, roquires
development review of the construction requested by the Mermaid
Supper Club at 2200 Highway 10; and
WHEREAS, the Mounds View Planning Commission has reviewed
the addition request and has recommended approval in their adoption
of Planning Commission Resolution No. 70-83; and
WHEREAS, the Mounds View City Council has reviewed the
development request and the recommended action of the Planning
Commission; and
WHEREAS, the Mounds View City Council has stated that approval
from Rice Creek Watershed District be received prior to development
agreement execution; and
® WHEREAS, approval by Rice Creek Watershed District was given
at their March 23, 1983 meeting; and
WHEREAS, a copy of Development Agreement No. 83-56 is hereto
attached;
NOW, THEREFORE, DE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View City
Council authorize its Clerk -Administrator and Mayor to execute
Development Agreement No. 83-56 pursuant to direction found above.
Adopted this 28th day of March, 1983.
ATTEST: —
Mayor
(SEAL)
r
L
Clerk -Administrator
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
MOUNDS VIEW DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 83-56
MENMAID SUPPER CLUB
THIS AGREEMENT made and cntored into this day of
, 19 , by and between the CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW,
County of Ramsey, State of Minnesota, party of the first part,
hereinafter called the "City",
and Mermaid Supper Club
party of the second part, hereinafter called the "Developer",
W I T N E S S E T H:
WHEREAS, the Developer, in consideration of a develop-
41 ment proposal for the construction of an addition to the existing
building
and the issuance of permits thereof, hereby agrees with the City to
perform all of the acts required herein and to conform to all of
the conditions set forth as follows:
1. Wherever the word "City" appears herein, it shall mean
and include the City of Mounds View and also said City's agents and
employees; and wherever the word "Developer" appears herein, it
shall mean the developer, and any of its agents and employees.
Wherever the words "development site" appear herein, it shall mean
the premises described in the following exhibits:
Exhibit 1 (legal description)
Exhibit 2 (site plan)
Exhibit 3 (floor plan )
Exhibit 4 (final plans & specifications )
Rev. 4/13/81
u
the City in the processing, review and evaluation of the proposed
• development and in the inspection of all work performed pursuant
to .aid contrn•1. Such costs shall .inaludo hill: notbo limited to
Lhc adminisLr,,livc, lcgdl, and engineering expenses incurred herein,
and such other expenses as authorized by said Chapter.
13. Developer agreos that the City can terminate development
of the development site or the construction of any building struc-
tures thereon if in the City counci.l's opinion the terms of this
Development Contract have not been conformed to by the developer
and the said Developer herein agrees to cease construction and
waives its right of recourse, claim, suit or action against the
City. In addition, in the event the Developer fails to conform to
the conditions of this Agreement, the City shall be entitled to
a enforce it pursuant to the terms of this contract and/or the provi-
sions of the Mounds View Home Rule Charter, Chapter 26 of the
Municipal Code, or applicable Minnesota Statutes. The Developer
herein agrees that in the event the City is compelled to enforce
any of the provisions of this contract by court action and judgment
is rendered in favor of the City, that all costs, disbursements
and reasonable attorney's fees will be paid by said Developer, its
heirs, successors and assigns.
14. The Developer shall furnish to the City at the time of
the execution of this Contract a cash bond, a corporate surety bond,
an irrevocable letter of credit or any other negotiable instrument
approved by the City Attorney, which the Developer agrees to keep in
full force and effect during the term of the obligation created
herein in the amount of five thousand (5,000)
Dollars, wherein the
-4-
MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION
RES0111PI'IOil NO. 70-83
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION APPROVING 191E DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL FOR AN
ADDITION TO THE MERMAID SUPPER CLUB, PLANNING CASE 122-82
WHEREAS, Mounds View Municipal Code, Chapter 59.07, requires
review of the proposed addition to the Mermaid Supper Club; and
WHEREAS, the Mounds View Planning Commission has reviewed
this proposed addition, including parking requirements; and
WHEREAS, sufficient parking spaces exist for both the existing
structure and the proposed addition; and
WHEREAS, the Mounds View Planning Commission sees no negative
impact arising from the proposed addition or its intended use;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE TT RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning
Commission recommends approval of the proposed addition to the
Mermaid Supper Club based upon the site plan dated December 15, 1982.
The approval shall be contingent upon the applicant receiving approval
C from the nice Creek Watershed District in addition to Mounds View
Municipal Codes (i.e., Chapter 49A);
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a development agreement should be
executed which includes the following:
ATTEST:
(SEAL)
1) Site Plan
2) Floor Plan
3) Final Plans and Specifications
4) A Security in the Amount of $5,000 for the Addition
Adopted this 5th day of January, 1983.
Chairman
birecL•or o Pu lie flf rks Community
Development
6
is
A.
1 � 1••
II•Iilll ' : '
RE�i.IVEU
`` CITY or
MOUNDS VIEW
Rice Creek wArsliecl,
31ae, LI.RIN(;ION AVI,NO[ NURIn, SUIII. L I //
ARDEN IIILLS, MINNESOTA VII2
IELEPIIONE (612) 483•0634 ,
.i
I
Mauch 17, 1983
'l
- , Baaltl of Managers
Regelar Meetings.
2nd and 41h Wednesdays
at Arden Hills City Hall
BONNIE TORPE, Admin. ASS1.
Mr. Daniel L. Hall
Mermaid Cocktail Lounge, Inc.
2200 N.E. Hwy. lU
Nuunds View, MN 55112
He: Permit Application No. 83-07: Daniel L. Hall
Location: 22UO Northeast Highway 10, Mounds View
Purpose: Approval of a Final Site Drainage Plan.
Applicant is proposin6 to construct a
2,dUU square toot aduition to an existing
building located on the 5.5± acre site.
Dear Mr.11all:
Receipt Is aoknuwlL:dLed for the followin6 exhibits:
1. Permit application dated January 7, 1983•
2. Stormwater Management Plan for the Mermaid Cocktail
Lounge, prepared by K.G. Norby and Associates, Inc.
and dated January 31, 1983,
The exhibits submitted show compliance with the rules and guide-
lines of the District. Therefore, the District Engineer hereby
Issues administrative approval of the project subject to ratifi-
cation by the Hoard of Managers at their next rebularly scheduled
meotint on March 23, 1983•
1 no OF M.":46LRS
Dihm ItII,d IS1AIl CI KINK: L.Ii SCOII, SR.
QJ 4AlIILIN}NII:+II eetgl, .NNh �A-
\INM\fl ltll�� �•�anh'. IMO 11,NtiEl IilJ,lh 0
Nabe Two
March 17, I9H3
Mr. Uenald L. Hull
very truly yours,
E.A. BICKOK AMD ASSUCIATHS, INC.
Engineersforthe District
Steven G. Miller
Engineer
SGM:js
cc. Board of Managers
Am ormo
F. Murray
.wly of Fridley
,
0
1{h;;!11,117TQ!1 I: 1586
MUNTY OF itLLY;P;Y
SPATE. OF Id1I1HEGOTA
N'UIIOVDIC JUS•r AND CO101I?f,'r
CLAIRS AOATIIST CITY FUNIG
WHENl?d^,
Lie My Council of 1lnnnda View, pursuant to
Nfianesntn :;LaLnLrn
l,l".2Q1,
has fa11 authoril;y over the finmlcial affairs
ol• Lhr (My :lid;
I°flFail?A:>,
The (;Illy
Council has ravier;cd
the claims number,;:
I.hroiy;h
18008
ill I•lie :nmiun6 ul' :f
35,823.79
L890 Lhroulth
_18011
ill the amntail. of $
3,421.14
10954 1.111tuq,li
•11022
ill I.hc amnaul, of :B
41,956.34
Lbrough
iu LLB• :nnonnl• nl' Lr
'fOMI, AMOUNT OF CLAIM!
1111EA-JITED :I
81,201.27
® and ha:; found :paid claims fro be ,lust and correct;
(list of any exception)
H071 THEREFORE, he it resolved that the City Council of ?,founds View
hereby approved Lhe al,Lached lists of claims dated _ by the
vote aye.^, nayes
ATTEST:
Hayor
Clerk-AdmirdntraLor
ADDITIONAL DIRECT EXPENDITURES
CHECK AMOUNT CLAIMANT
18009 $ 320.00 U.S. Postmaster
18010 1,788.75 John C. Johnson
18011 1,312.39 Ernest Grabowski
$3,421.14
PURPOSE
postage
professional service
salary
CITY ^F PCUkC`_ YICII A [ C C C F L L CA IF ':. 'd5 A7 F'<< ! �S'•
• it
CH: CK� h N 0 L N I C L A I N A N T F U F C S L +;
s
017999 57.00 NORTH hENNEPIN CC? CCL TFAININC '
"I 018000 15.00 LIAN HAPFFF ORANIS + SLrSJJI`S
I1t-•—_.---
FAP
�..- 018001 5.00 NPLS CTEP AN TRAINING
•i,1 019002 30.00 CUANE PCCAFTY CEPCSITS bUILCiNJ U.:A.,E
018003 5.80 L ° NICOL PFC SLPFLIES,CPF21TING �
325.00 IPOOF 4CC FCS74CE
0.1i•I i i;�
018005 28,631.06 FIRST STATE SANK CF SALARIES, REGULAR. +;
A1,C-C1'ERTINE, RE(L'LAR fi
•I i _wiltIS' At+O-SALAFICS1ENF+PAP1 TINE w
011006 2,C45.0 STATE TREASURER FENSICNS L4 �
018007 49E94.88 STATE TREAS - F E f< A FENSICNS
oiy, 013008 1E.00 CONO PARK 70C TICME + RECISIRATIONS
10 35,823.79 ACCESSARY EXFENCITURES SINCE LAST COLNCIL PEETINC C
p
i M '
CITY Cf MCUNCS
VIiW
CHFCK* A
H O U N T
010954
9.38
010955
20.00
h �
01095E
45.52
3
OiC957
1,555.00
010958
160.70
�• ���---
010959
24.05
__.
01096G
344.00
SRI
O1C461
34E.01
010962
39.81
I
010963
34.19
ol'i
010964
92,31
010965
878,90
01796E
89750.00
�I�I
010967
30. EO
i.
�p l
,010968
22.59
010 96 9
238.38
ii
®
01397C
14.00
010971
4.00
p�
O1C97i
i2.34
e?;
Ofri973
17.55
011974
5.87
01097S
8.49
01097E 169.19
G C C C L I, T P A Y F.
[ L A) M A N T
AHERICAN LINEN FLPF0 CO
CFUCE AhCEPSCh
ASSOC INCEP�NOENT CFALrR
EOLGER PUPLICAIIONS
ERIGHICN VET'cRINA;Y 1CSF
CHIFFEKA SPRINCS CCRP
CONTRACT CLEANING
COPY CLFLICATIhG FFOC
COUNTRY CLUB MARKET
CROWN AUTO STORES
CATA CISFATCH ING
DATA OFERATICHS, INC.
CMC, TRUCK + COACH CIV
HEALY LAECR.ATOPICS
IC HA
J C AUTO SUPPLY
LILLIF SUBURBAN NEWS
LCNC LIKE 66
HELS VAR-O-LITE
NEW MINAR FORC INC
CITY CF MCLNGS VIEV
MOUNOS VIEW CUE: Ct0 HCVE
h 14 DELL TELEPHONE CO
�r,TL 0-29-E? PAC
P U F F C
CLEANTI,C-TCWELS
MMFEhM
SLFFLIE99 VEHICLE
PFINTINC
CTM FRCFESSIGFAL SEFV
SUFFLIES,CFERATINC
JANITOR SERVICE
FENTAL, ECUIPhEhl
FF'STIVITIFS CCMMISSICI%
VEHICLES
CCNT, SVCS., CELIVERY
CCNT. SVCS., KEY PUNCf
VEHICLES
CThER FFCFESSIOFIL SL$�V
ECONS r FEFTCCICALS
SUPPLIES, VCHICLC
AND-SUFFLIES,CPF ATIN(
ANO-VEHICLES
Ah0-SUFFLIES7 EGLIFMEhl
FCOKS I PERIODICALS
SUPPLIES, VEHICLE
SLFFLIES, ELOCS!GFhOS
SUPPLIES, VEHICLE
FEFLNCS
VEHICLES
AND-FE;TIVITIES' COHMIES10P
CCHPLNICAIICNS-TELCFHCNL.
® 1�
vl;
QM
lJ
CITY : - F'CL"•r•
VIEW
.CF, C0 A
N 0 U N I
011977
7.90
nvg78
121.39
ij
_..410979
29.68
01F980
49E58.51
L:
01^981
2,475.12
4•
010982
___ 010983
010984
010985
01098E
n1no87
_010958
__._016 9 8 9
01999n
�010991
_.._010992
O 1'.' 99'i
010994
G10995
A C C C L 1i T S P A Y A P L E
C L A I M A h T
NELSCh: OFFTCic:'JFFLIES
NEW E' I.'•NTCN HCW
NORTH SU6UF.BAN RENT ALL
NORTHCFN STA IFS PChFr CO
NORTHERN STATES PCWER
29470.36 NORTHERN SIAI`S FCh'h
108.00
PEPSI
COLA BOTTLING CO
55.50
FITNEY
ECW'ES ThC
15.93
FACIO
SHACK
60.00
RAPSEY
COUNTY FTAC
7,734.99
RAPSEY
COUNTY TREASURin
454.51 F + T CFFICE FRnDLCTS
55.00
65.64
171.70
25.52
79703.33
30.00
2E4.76
SALNCCRS-TMALDEN + ASSCC
PTTF LUMBER CO
SNI17 NAWFACTURING CO
SNYDERS CRUG STOP.ES
SPRING LK FARK FIRE CEPT
ST HARIE SFEET METAL INC
ST FAUL ECCKfS1ATI0NER1
CATE 17-29-E,l C 3
°j
F U F F C S F
MISC OFFICE SUFFLIES
j
VEHICLES
t b,
ANC-SLFFLIESICPERATIN'C
4NC-SLFPLJES9 UTILITIES)
SUPFLIES, UTILITIES
iYYrd.
ELECTRICITY
'Yi
S
ANO-NAILRAL CAS
AND -TRAFFIC SIGNALS - ELECT
fi
1�
ELECTRICITY
ANC-NAILF.AL CAS
+;
h�.
ELECTFIC11'r _
AW-STREET LIGHIS
R E F L N C
PCSTACz
! •
SL'FFL1EStCFERATIN6
.00
TRAININC
n�
TRAFFIC SIGIPALS - ELECT
q.,Cy
ANO-PRINTING
__...
AND-SNCW FLCWING-SANDING
la�
MISC CFFICE SUPPLIES
+"
ANG-MINE[ SLFFLIES�""'
00-ECUIPtENT
ANC-FRINTING
ANC-SUFFLIESrCPERATING
44
M
GThEF FROFESSIOAL SM
SUFFLTESrCPERATING
G
SLPFLIES.CFERATING
P •
SLFFLIES,CFERATINC
�pi
GRANTS r SUESIOJES
LIS
R E F l N 0
�q
SLFFLIES,CFERATINi
It:
- CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW A C C C L N T P A Y A E L E CATE C3-29-83 Pf.0
-.CHECK+ P M O U N T C L A I P A N I P U P F C S E
010995
i
44.52 h F TCLL CCHFf,NY
OSG997
24.49
�oi
�
O1'0998
15E.00
■
�'�
010999
85.00
0
172.00
all Pic 1
105.60
-011002
44.00
0
011003
15G.00
011004
f0.G0
all 005
480.00
•E
�
ait nnE
i5J-A9
~'I
D11G07
25.58
Ulu"
3"u 0•Gu"
•I!
011009 _
3 4. 13
011011
30.00
011012
1P0.00
oTl,
^.0It013
103.50
•
~�
i
011014
15.00
S'
+"
011015
11.00
oi�''
'
071016
25C.GG
011017
120.00
VIKING CHEVRCLET
CLEM WILLIAMS FILMS INC
SUE ANCERSON
JUCY DENhAl1
ANN EDSEN
MARK hJELLE
HAERI TCLLEFSON
JEANNE VINT
AEROEIC CYNAHICS
TRTAP.CC ARTS + CRAFTS
PRENTICE-HALL, INC
KEN LrIM
MAFJORIE PFA14KE
KEFNETH FPCSE
GERARD SCHNEIDER
SPF.ING LAKE FK LICNS CL
CATCO
JUCY JCHNSCN
SAKORRA HUEc"ENEF-
OFFICE ECUIP Y,AREHCUSE
NORTH. CENT;AL SECT AW
011018 20.00 CATHY CRETSCH
0 k'�
13.00 KENNY NELSON
0
VEHICLES
i
E
ANG-SLFFLIES,OPEFATTNG
SLPFLIES,CFEFATIhc'
SLFFLIES,CFERATING
R
PFOGRAP INSIPLCIC:�
PROCRAM 1NSIRLCTCFS
r
tr
FFCGRIP U SIRLCICRS
i
F'FOGFAP INSIRLCICRS
�.
FFOC°CP INSTRUCTC�S
PFOGRAP INSTRUCTCFS
FFOGRAP IWRLCICNS
SLPFLIES,CFERATINC
I.
SUFFLIES,CFFRLTIPG
PFGf.RAM rnclFCrTcf S
PEFLNESM
REFChLS
FEFLNLS
I.
R E F L N C
i
j
REPAIRS, ECLIFHEtT
GFANIS f SLESTOUe
R E F U N D
i
EGUIPPENT
SLFFLIES,CFERATINf
ONE-IRAINING
R F. F L N C
!
R E F L N U
s
f
I
I
i
1
.�
CITY CF NCJ1"-
VI EN
A C C 0 U N T S P A Y A B L E
CATE
03-29-9:; Ik:
CHFi,K*
" N L T
( L A I N A IN T
F U
3 F C` E
e ' _ 011020
dial
15.00
FALNEF CRIVE SINGEFS
TICKriS + FEG:.;i=1ICi•f
z
011021
15.00
JENNIFER TF'YNIAN
F E
F L N 0
011022
11.00
FUTN VANREESC
F E
f U N 0
1•ifl. ____ 69
41,95E.34
ChECNS WRITTEN
TOTAL Of
79 CHECKS
TCTAL 77j78C.13
MT•
\ MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Director of Public Works/Community Development
DATE: March 24, 1983
UBJBCT: WETLAND ALTERATION PERMIT FOR LOTS 1 AND 2, BLOCK 2,
PARK VIEW TERRACE, FOR TONY POPPELAARS
Mr. Dick Meyers, Don Pauley, and myself met on March 23, 1983 to
discuss questions raised at the joint City Council and Planning
Commission meeting held March 21, 1983. Mr. Meyers will meet with
the Council at 6:30 p.m. on March 28, 1983 to answer any further
questions.
The following facts were identified by staff which the Council should
use in making their decision on the application:
1) Per provisions of 48.05, Subdivision 6, both lots 1 and 2
are non -conforming and will need variances per provisions
of Chapter 40 (decision by the Planning Commission) in
order to develop.
2) Lot 1 does not contain any "wetland" but is almost entirely
covered by the wetland buffer area. To build on Lot 1, a
variance to the 100 foot setback provision of 48.05, Subdivi-
sion 5, will be necessary together with the alteration permit.
3) Lot 1 has 14,380 square feet and at a density of one unit per
2,500 square feet would allow 5.75 units if parking and open
space requirements are met.
4) Lot 2 has 1G,799 square feet of which 9,500 square feet are
wetland. Only accessory buildings which do not conflict with
purposes of Chapter 48 can be allowed within a wetland per
provisions of 48.05, Subdivision 2.
5) If lots 1 and 2 are combined into one parcel of record (which
would require a replat), then the density transfer provisions
of 48.08, Subdivision l(B) could be utilized. Total developable
area is 21,679 square feet which would allow 8.67 units plus
transfer of up to 7.6 units from the wetland for at total maxi-
mum density 55116.27 units if parking and open space requirements
can be met, if any.
6) Precedent, if any, set would only apply to drainage basin of
wetland in question.
7) Use of the property in question has been determined by current
zoning (R-3), Comprehensive Plan, public improvements of sewer,
water and street, special assessments and previously paid
property taxes.
Mayor and City Council
Page 2
March 24, 1983
other data as it rciates to the provisions of 48.06, Subdivision 3,
will be developed and presented if the City Council determines
that these parcels can be developed under the provisions of Chapter
48.
JCJ/bc
MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Director of Public Works/Community Devevelopment
DATE: March 24, 1983
SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 82-54 WITH BOB EIGENEREER
FOR EUGEWOOD SQUARE SUBDIVISION
Currently, drainage from portions of proposed lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
and 6 or approximately 1.49 acres runs off to County Road I (see
attached sketch). This would result in a current undeveloped dis-
charge of 0.149 acre-foot to County Road I. After a meeting with
the developer and his engineer, the drainage plan has been revised
to divert all runoff from lots 3,4, 5 and 6 (approximately 0.89 acres)
to the west and onto proposed Edgewood Drive and ultimately into the
proposed detention nnnd. Runoff from lots 1 and 2 (approximately 0.60
acres) will continue to flow to County Road I. Runoff to County Road
I after development will be 0.105 acre-feet. This is a net reduction
of 0.044 acre-feet of runoff to County Road I, thus exceeding the
requirements of Chapter 49A (Resolution No. 983). The diversion of
additional runoff to the detention pond will result in the pond
elevation, after the 100 year storm, to rise from 902.7 to 903.0.
The pond embankment will be raised to account for this additional
water.
Based on the revised data, staff recommends that the City Council
approve the drainage plan for Edgewood Square Subdivision.
Dick Meyers indicated to staff that the development agreement and
Final Plat deadlines can be extended by City Council resolution under
certain conditions. Mr. Meyers will report to the City Council at
the 3/28/83 meeting.
This project will soon move to the construction phase. Staff would
like Council direction as to how the Council would like the inspection
work completed. Staff would suggest the developer provide daily
inspection services and "as -built" drawings with the City providing
personnel during key tests such as pressure tests of sewer and water -
mains and compaction testing of trenches and road subgrade.
JCJ/bc
Attachment
1I M
t
M WOOD �OUANE
WONTY I DA9 I
TO: Mayor, City Council, and
Clerk -Administrator
FROM: Civil Service Commission
DATE: March 23, 1983
RE: Appointment of Acting Chief
Effective April 1, 1983, Sergeant Timothy Smith will be appointed
Acting Chief of the Mounds View Police Department, as provided by
section 12 of the Civil Service rules. This provisional appointment
will not exceed 90 days.
It is the Civil Service Commission's intention, to evaluate and
examine eligible candidates to establish an eligibility list, from
which a permanent appointment can be made.
Richard Paradise
Chairman
TO: Mayor, City Council, and
Clerk -Administrator
FROM: Police Department
DATE: March 24, 1983
RE: Community Service Officer Program
As of December 15, 1982, the Community Service Officer's program was temporarily
terminated because an attempt was being made to save budget money during the
winter months. The program budget had been approved for fiscal 1983 but we felt
that winter months were basically inactive.
~ We have not noticed any increase in nuisance calls and Police Officers have
been handling the situations as they arise.
Our intention during these past months has been to reinitiate the program
when the snow clears and people begin noticing descrepancies" in their
neighbor's yards, i.e., junk cars, rubbish and debris. With the early
disappearance of snow this year we will have to think seriously of hiring
a Community Service Officer in mid -April or May, with the thought in mind
of stretching the slack period to the limit and conserving the budget.
A new duty will most likely be added to the Community Service Officer position;
that of organizing and promoting the recently initiated Block Watch Program.
The Block Watch Program is designed to alert neighborhoods to suspicious
activities and encourage residents to get information to the Police Department.
If the Council wishes, we could have the Community Service Officer position
filled in a relatively short time.
ADMINISTRATIVE
NEWSLETTER
March 28, 1983 Clty of Mounds VIEW VOL. IV, NO. 5
CIVIC CONSORTIUM
This office recently received a letter from the Assistant Superintendent
for Administrative Services with the Mounds View School District requesting
City staff participation in two meetings scheduled for April 13th to
discuss the feasibility of joint efforts in a variety of different areas.
SLaf.f will be discussing this matter at our next Department Head meeting
and prepare for attendance at these meetings by the appropriate Department
Heads responsible for the areas invoked. Updates will be provided to
You as progress is made in this area.
MINNESOTA ENERGY CONSERVATION SERVICE PROMOTION
This office was contacted by representatives of the Minnesota Department
of Energy Planning and Development requesting the City's assistance in
the promotion of the Minnesota Energy Conservation Service which provides
low cost ($10.00) home energy audits which are performed by Northern
States Power Company at the request of utility customers. It is the
desire of the Department of Energy Planning and Development to publicize
the availability of this service as widely as possible and promote its
use by single family residential property owners within the metropolitan
area.
Staff will be reviewing the program, which includes financial assistance
for promotional activities, and develop recommendations for Council
consideration regarding promotion of this service.
CALENDAR
March
28
2:00
p.m.
Hearing on Smith Transfer Tax
Abatement with Minnesota
Department of Revenue and
Ramsey County Department of
Property Taxation
7:30
p.m.
Council Meeting
March
29
9:00
a.m.
Department Head Meeting
April
1
All
day
Holiday
April
4
7:00
P.M.
Agenda Session
April
5
9:00
a.m.
Department Head Meeting
April
7
9:00
a.m.
Records Management Exposition
CITY STAFF WISHES ALL OF YOU A HAPPY EASTER!
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
CITY COUNCIL
® AGENDA SESSION
April 4, 1983
7:00 p.m.
1. Consideration of staff recommendation regarding utility
collection policy.
2. Consideration of Mr. Miller's request to process coextensively
(per provisions of Chapter 48.O6, Subd. 4, A, 3) the plat
for the "dry buildable" portion of his property.
3. Consideration of Dynamic Designers request for a development
on Lots 3 and 4, Block 2, Park View Terrace.
4. Discussion of residents' request to correct surface water
drainage concern on St. Stephen between Highway 10 and Bronson.
5. Consideration of Atometer modification and repairs for
Treatment Plant No. 1.
6. Discussion of Planning Commission's recommended revisions
to Chapter 39, Signs and Billboards.
7. Consideration of staff memorandum regarding Smith Transfer
tax abatement.
8. Set date for 1983 Spring Clean Up Day.
9. Consideration of staff memorandum regarding employee health
insurance coverage.
10. Consideration of staff memorandum regarding awarding of tree
and stump removal contract.
11. Consideration of staff memorandum regarding proposal to hire
regular part-time employee to coordinate City's Aquatics Program.
12. Consideration of staff memorandum regarding awarding contracts
for Silver View Park Development.
T'O: Mayor & Council
FROM: Finance DiI-N-tor-Treasurer III,
Utility Accounting Clerk Sandgren j
DATE: March 31, 1983
RE: PROPOSED UTILITY OILL COLLECTION POLICIES
As of March 23, 1983 the City was owed a total of $16,844.30 of
delinquent utility bills. Of this amount $7,276.63 was payable
from the fourth quarter 1982 billing which was due February 28, 1983
and $9,567.67 was payable from third quarter 1982 and earlier billings.
At the present time the computer program for utility billings and
collections does not identify on a per account basis the quarter (s)
for which an account is delinquent. We are only able to determine if
a particular account is delinquent for the current billing. If the
account has a balance forward, that balance is from the previous
quarter or quarters.
During a review of the City's collection policies we found that the
policies and procedures which have been followed for many years were
not formally adopted by this Council or past Councils. We feel that
it is in the best interests of the City and its utility customers to
have a formally adopted collection policy. We have prepared a draft
of a proposed policy for your consideration which is attached and
includes samples of letters and notices sent to customers with delin-
quent accounts. It is basically the policy which has been informally
followed for many years.
Past discussions with the City Attorney have indicated that in most
instances it is not cost effective to pursue legal remedies to enforce
collection of delinquent utility bills. The only cost effective
methods left to us after gentle persuasion has failed are discontinuation
of water service until the balance due has been paid and/or certification
to the County for collection with tax bills the following year.
We have made use of a promissory agreement whereby a customer would
pay the delinquent balance due in installment payments. This has had
only limited success. To illustrate: after notices were sent last
fall to customers with delinquent accounts, eight promissory agreements
were signed. At the present time three customers are fulfilling or
have fulfilled their agreements.
Discontinuation of service is a last resort after a customer has not
responded to the current billing and a reminder letter. On the average
we sent 200-250 reminder notices each quarter. After that we send a
notice that the account is in danger of having service discontinued.
This averages 75-125 notices each quarter. We then attempt to reach
approximately 25-30 customers by phone to advise that they are in
danger of having service discontinued due to non payment. Finally a
certified letter is sent to approximately 12 customers advising that
service will be discontinued on a specified date due to non payment.
.arch 31, 1983
Page 2
Actual discontinuation of service by shut off of water would have
averaged 3-9 in the last year and a half had we followed a shut off
policy. We have not shut off water because the maintenance department
has had more pressing duties to perform. The last time we shut off
water was October 1981. At that time three services were discontinued.
Certification of delinquent balances to the County for collection is
the other tool we have to enforce collection. A proposed policy for
this procedure is attached.
we recommend that Council adopt the attached Billing and Collection
Procedures as the City's utility bill collection policy. Should you
have any questions do not hesitate to contact us.
DB/ds
Attachments
1
IMPORTANT NOTICE LETTERS
MAILED
TO THE FOLLOWING ON 3 ':3�'oJ
4/1/83
4/15/83 '/y
LETTERS ARE DATED
DUE DATE
James Maher
Donald Spagenski
2608 Ardan Avenue
48.79
2415 County Road I (B)
74.07
Rose Ann Langenberger
Donald Spagenski
2740 Ardan Avenue
45.71
2415 County Road I (A)
274.09
Gordon Smith
Daniel McFarlane
2816 Ardan Avenuo
295.87
2848 County Road I
54.78
Clark Buzzell
Gerald Wilke
2832 Ardan Avenue
93.34
7842 Eastwood Road
36.91
Steve Miller
Larry Wedin
2174 Belle Lane
176.52
7990 Eastwood Road
626.93
Leo Ohnstad
Richard M. Nelson
7730 Bona Road
53.02
8260 Eastwood Road
48.73
Ralph J. Zeglin
Larry Meagher
5046 Brighton Lane
39.05
8270 Eastwood Road
45.16
Elsie Skarda
John Eliason
2135 Bronson Drive
34.21
8323 Eastwood Road
37.24
Dennis L. Cooper
Arthur & Susan Hentges
2209 Bronson Drive
60.92
8444 Eastwood Road
91.56
Daniel Hall
Lawrence Dobbins
2808 Bronson Drive
93.34
5179 Edgewood Drive
46.31
Kenneth Sjodin
Larry Graham
!
2841 Bronson Drive
59.68
5270 Edgewood Drive
96.77
Gary A. Lavdsseur
Duane E. Lorenz
3024 Bronson Drive
43.29
7900 Edgewood Drive
34.85
Roger Janssen
Larry Tibbetts
2440 Clearview Avenue
310.86
8088 Edgewood Drive
44.50
James Deutsch
Ann VanHorne
5294 Clifton Drive
137.28
5434 Erickson Road
53.02
Melvin C. Schuchard
Deborah Benton
5386 Clifton Drive
47.52
8000 Fairchild Avenue
46.35
John Curry
David Sabby
5391 Clifton Drive
34.21
8275 Fairchild Avenue
48.73
Robert Waste B & R
Bruce Frits
2345 County Road 112
65.07
8400 Fairchild Avenue
84.48
Robert A. Rogers
Gregory Crum
'
2536 County Road 112
87.89
7820 Gloria Circle
150.33
Lawrence Westerlund
Leo Benning
1940 County Road :12
34.21
5279 Greenfield Avenue
56.63
IMPORTANT NOTICE LETTERS MAILED TO THE FOLLOWING ON 3 - 3 I -oQ3
LETTERS ARE DATED 4/1/83 DUE DATE 4/15/83
James Carter Ronald Anderson
7660 Greenfield Avenue 55.04 5317 Jackson Drive 34.82
Lawrence Lindstrom
7936 Greenfield Avenue 51.81
Edward Schimmel
8032 Greenwood Drive 49.94
Russell A. Warren
8044 Greenwood Drive 37.84
Samuel Simmons
8377 Groveland Court 55.05
Michael Hyland
7635 Groveland Road 39.05
Daniel Reis
7710 Groveland Road 93.78
Great American Tire
2848 Highway #10 81.00
Klostreich Properties
2065 Hillview Road 348.B2
Dave Aronson
2342 Hillview Road 98.46
Larry Parks
2504 Hillview Road
123.74
Thomas Dreshar
2508 Hillview Road
208.78
Donald Klostreich
2509 Hillview Road
161.27
Robert Glazer
2625 Hillview Road
78.08
James Saterbak
2656 Hillview Road/
88.06
Constance Cormany
5066 Irondale Road 84.96
Douglas Baker
5133 Irondale Road 112.74
Clairin E113alawani
5144 Irondale Road 56.61
Jay Lawrence
r,IAA v�-uudal,> RoaJ 54.09
Therese Mailand
5381 Jackson Drive
Denise Smith
5387 Jackson Drive
Gary Anderson
5434 Jackson Drive
Earl Denney
5446 Jackson Drive
Richard Wong
5210 Jeffery Drive
Ron Cranset
2325 Knoll Drive
Donald Fodstad
2340 Knoll Drive
Allen Bonin
7090 Knollwood Drive
William Tarasar
7434 Knollwood Drive
Leona Johnson
7474 Knollwood Drive
Rodger. D. Robb Sr.
7580 Knollwood Drive
Chuck Buzzell
8230 Knollwood Drive
Richard Jacobson
8445 Knollwood Drive
Frank Kellermann
2215 Lambert Avenue
Laurance Moreland
2242 Lambert Avenue
Leona Kuehn
2349 Laport Drive
William Tisdell
2740-42 Laport Drive
Jeff Soliday
2748 Laport Drive
48.13
26.95
36.08
104.19
92.17
74.99
56.65
58.84
.1
93.20
58.41
45.32
110.54
120.60
42.68
49.30
342.74
268.93
37.24
IMPORTANT NOTICE LETTERS MAILED TO
THE FOLLOWING ON .3 - //- e 3
LETTERS ARE DATED
4/1/83 _DUE
DATE 4/15/83
David Lach
Donald Johansen
Lake Road
88.36
5352 Quincy Street
7801 Long
•
,r39.71
G.I. Properties 17PA441 191,�
Dolores Spallacci
Dolo
Dolo
134.52
5741-43 Quincy Street
433.55
Longview Drive
Thomas Chelberg
Gary Grieme
5172 Longview Drive
157.41
5045 Rainbow Lane
58.70
Darven Unruh
43.73
Kristine Kuitunen
5092 Rainbow Lane
36.03
5177 Longview Drive
Ernest Freyberger
47.47
Steven Larson
5385 Raymond Avenue
44.53
5178 Longview Drive
Virgil Kinnunen
46.37
Larry Stevens
5132 REd Oak Drive
49.89
2132 Oakwood Drive
Donald Beach
76.51
Edwin J. Baker
8155 Red Oak Drive
73.98
2265 Oakwood Drive
Larry Babcock
Stanley Serwa
5279 O'Connell Drive 179.65
8368 Red Oak Drive
181.50
Richard Huhne
Robert Waste Jr.
Court
233.34
8406 Red Oak Drive
29.65
5290 Pinewood
Dan Schraufnagcl
James P. Thibodeau
8420 Red Oak Drive
34.21,
5299 Pinewood Court
38.45
Larry McLaughlin
Dorothy Richardson
8443 Red Oak Drive
91.10
2077 Pinewood Drive
87.51
Philip St. Louis
Eugene Wilson
2119 Pinewood Drive
128.11
2309 Sherwood Road
B5.34
Leonard Lane
110.86
Donald Wynn
2333 Sherwood Road
45.71
2127 Pinewood Drive
James Schorn
8119 Pleasant View
Court 77.29
iiii
Now
Joseph Witzmann
Wayne Depew
2601 Sherwood Road
112.40
6991 Pleasant View
Drive 64.99
Helen L. Ecklund
34.99
Marcus Johnson
5060 Silver Lake Road
43.89
7011 Pleasant View
Drive
Patrick A. Morrison
Jareld Thompson
8250 Pleasant View
Drive 45.71
5262 Skiba Drive
51.83
Gary Gudim
Roger McKay
. B300 Pleasant View
Drive 52.97
8217 Spring Lake Road
46.38
Darrell Hanson
Ken Bourke
8249 Spring Lake Road
218.49
9344 Qulnry Street
135.39
IMPORTANT NOTICE LETTERS
MAILED
TO THE FOLLOWING ON 3 -3143
RTTERS ARE DATED 4/l/83
DUE DATE 4/15/83
Lawrence Myslicki
8454 Spring Lake (toad
39.05
Shirley Denzer
5607 St. Michael Street
66.88
Darrell Marshall
5352 St. Michael Street
22.11
Dennis F. Smith
5557 St. Stephen Street
66.94
John Westlund
5092 Sunnyside Road
52.21
Larry Roth
5108 Sunnyside Road
47.38
Joe Weller
7985 Sunnyside Road
52.86
Margaret Glidden
8251 Sunnyside Road
49.39
Andrew Bartley
8290 Sunnyside Road
89.91
Raquel B. Gutierrez
8494 Sunnyside Road
54.09
Chris Keller
2085 Terrace Drive
81.69
Carol Niesen
2138 Terrace Drive
341.14
Daniel Miller
2146 Terrace Drive
152.97
Dale Sandoz
2251 Terrace Drive
37.29
Terry Koehler
2605 Woodale Drive
55.84
Thomas
/J
2825 Woodale Drive
41.53
O�G�
David Neilson
2932 Woodale Drive
45.16
Carl Anderson
2948 Woodale Drive
148.98
I
DELINQUENT UTILITY BILLS
Tile folp wing accounts were
delinquent September
delinquent
21, were
on a proposed certification
list. The amounts
9/21/82 and as of 3/31/83 are listed below.
Name & Address
Delinquent amount
Delinquent amount
3 / /8
9/21/82
Gordon Smith
$ 62.54
$295.87
2816 Ardan Avenue
Beverly Fisher
163.12
274.22
(sewer
2901 County Road H2
only)
Larry Wedin
7990 Eastwood Road
355.70
626.93
Leona Kuehn
169.82
342.74
2349 Laport Drive
Gary Grieme
45.12
157.41
5172 Longview Drive
Donald Harrison
90.94
191.04
(sewer
7069 Pleasant View Drive
only)
C
G.I. Properties
117.20
433.55
5741-43 Quincy Street
Paul Johnson/Larry Babcock
181.50
8368 Red Oak Drive
413.90
Frank Young/Carol Niesen
157.36
34'1.14
2138 Terrace Drive
Steve Miller
q0 30
176.52
I
2174 Belle Lane
Roger Janssen
78.38
310.86
2440 Clearview Aveneu
t
Robert Waste Jr.
39.94
233.34
5290 Pinewood Court
Marvin Hanson
8360 Pleasant View Drive
131.50
202.98
(moved out)
t
Ken Bourke
8249 Spring Lake Road
56.28
218.49
It
BILLING & COLLECTION PROCEDURES
1. Service Por.iod of.
Utility Bills January - March 1st. quarter
April - June 2nd. quarter
July - September 3rd. quarter
October - November 4th. quarter
2. Mailing of Bills Mailing out quarterly, the last week
of January, April, July & October
3. Due Date of Bills 1 month from date of mailing, last
working day of February, May, August
and November
4. Reminder Notice 2 weeks after due date of bill.
Normally mailed by the 15th of March,
June, September & December
5. Due Date of Reminder
Notice 2 weeks from date of mailing
6. Mailing of important
Notice 2 or 3 days after due date of reminder
notice
7. Due Date of Important
Notice 2 weeks from date of mailing
8. Phone Call A day or two after due date of important
notice we try to reach customer by phone
and tell them they are on the shut off
list. If some arrangement is made for
payment they won't be shut off
9. Notice of Proposed
Discontinuation Certi.fyed letter sent to customers we
are unable to reach by phone
10. Shut off Water Water to customers who have not contact-
ed us to make arrangements for payment
or who we are unable to reach by phone
or letter is shut off.
11. Payment of Utility Bill The customer is charged a restoration
fec of $20.00. $30.00 is charged for
evening or week -end restoration. When
this is paid and the bill paid or arrang-
ements for payment made, the water service
will be resumed.
12. Tax Certification
Procedures Accounts which are
delinquent will be
certifyod. 53 administrative fee, 8%
interest is added. (see attached list
of procedures)
f_
11
CITY CF MOINOS VIEW 784-3055 CITY OF
2401 HIGFWAY 1C I MOUNDS VIEW
MOLNCS VIEWS MINNESOiA 55112 UTILITY BILL
id I:UIIWI NU "��': �. �'. UUE UAIL dL1UUn1 AGUUUNi IJO. DUE DATE
r- 987654 12/31/8 3/28/831 35.50 I 1-987654 3128183
Mr. Forgetful
3224 Oversight Lane
Mounds View, MN. 55112
New Rd 666
Old Rd 644
rUse 22 (thous)
I ITEM AMOUNT
sewer 24.50
water 11.00
'Just a friendly reminder -- Your DaymenE
is past due. Please see enclosed notice.
Total 35.50
REMINDER
- We thought you would appreciate this reminder
that your municipal utility account is past due
in the amount indicated on the enclosed billing.
- This is probably an oversight on your part, how-
ever, this matter should be taken care of
promptly.
- If payment has just recently been sent, please
accept our thanks. If not, we would appreciate
your help in bringing your account up to date.
- If you have a question or a problem on any part
of your account please contact us as soon as
possible at 784-3055•CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
Cif of VoRig 4
RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA
2401 HIGHWAY 10
MOUNDS VIEW, MINN. 55112
184.3055
April 1, 1983
114PORTANT NOTICE
Dear Customer,
The records in this office indicate that your municipal
utility account (water and/or sewer service) is past due in
the amount of $ for the service period endin
December 31, 1983.
111case pay this account in full or make arrangements with
this office for installment payments: no later than April 15, 1983.
Your municipal water service is in danger of being interrupted if
your account romain:; unpaid. Should service be discontinued due
to non payment, service will be resumed only upon payment of the
bill plus a $20.OU restoration fee ($30.00 is charged for evening
or weekend restoration.
Should you find that there is a question or problem on any
part of your account or if payment has been sent prior to this
mailing, please contact the Utility Accounting Clerk at 784-3055.
ds
/l
Sincerely,
CITY 012 MOUNDS VIEW
BILLING DEPARTMENT
f
April 16, 1982
1 1 tl'1 I I 11 1 l 11 1 i
Dear Customer,
We have unsuccessfully attempted to contact you by telephone
regarding payment of your bill. Therefore, we are notifying you that
your municipal utility account is past due in the amount of b
for the service period October 1 to December 31, 1981.
Please pay this account in full or make arrangements for payment
no later than ril 3U, 1982, NOOii The a-,unicipal water service will I
be turned off i your account remains unpaid. Service will be resumed
only upon payment of the bill plus a $20.00 restoration fee $30.00
is charged for evening or weekend restoration)_
Should you find that there is a question or problem on any part
of your account or if payment has been sent prior to this mailing,
please contact the Utility Accounting Clerk at 784-3055.
ds
Sincerely,
CITY OF MOUNDS VILW
BILLING DEPARTMENT
I�
•
II•
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
PROMISSORY AGREEMENT
This agreement made the — _ day of lg
I,
promise to pay to tile City of Mounds View, or order, for utility charges,
which I herehy ocknowledge are due and payahlc, tile. following amounts:
1 �..-..-..._._—_ paid this date.
2. to be paid by the _ day of lg_;
3. Sto be paid by the _ day of _ lg_;
• S __— _-__ TOTAL TO OE PAID BY
Ilti1 ty customer
Address
TAX CERTIFICATION PROCEDURES
].. Second Agenda Session of July.
List of delinquent accounts proposed to be certified
submitted to Council
2. Second Council Meeting of July
Council approves list of accounts proposed to be certified
to County for collection and authorizes mailing of notices
advising of intent to certify.
3. First Working Day of August
Letters mailed to accounts which are delinquent advising
of intent to certify to County for collection unless paid
within 30 days and advises of hearing date.
4. Last Working Day of August
Last day for payment before list of delinquent accounts
to be certified is prepared.
5. Second Agenda Session in September
Staff submits to Council a list of delinquent accounts
proposed to be certified to the County.
6. Second Council Meeting in September
SCouncil holds hearing and certifies delinquent accounts
for collection by County.
7. October 10
List of accounts certified for collection delivered to
Ramsey County.
r]
MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council I,
FROM: Director of Public Works/Community Developments
DATE: March 31, 1983
SUBJECT: MR. MILLER'S REQUEST TO PROCESS A PLAT ON THE PREDOMI-
NATELY "DRY -BUILDABLE" PORTIONS OF HIS PROPERTY
Attached is a copy of Mr. Bruce Malkerson's letter dated March 31,
1983, outlining Mr. Miller's request to proceed to final plat on
a portion of his property. The letter contains a historical summary
of events as to Mr. Miller's proposal. Staff has reviewed the
summary and make the following comments:
1) Page 3, Item 9 - The Planning Commission did meet on July
2, 1980, and tabled the application for consultant review
and input.
2) Page 3, Item 14 - Attached are minutes from the Planning
Commission meeting of December 10, 1980. The Planning
Commission raised and discussed questions and concerns
regarding wetlands. Their action concluded the need for
input from the Attorney and Engineer.
3) Page 4, Item 17 - Attached are the Planning Commission
minutes of the January 7, 1981, meeting and Resolution No.
03-81 in which a recommendation of denial was given regard-
ing the proposed plat.
4) Pages 4, 5 and 6, Section B - in its near entirety misrep-
resents actions and conclusions on the various dates and
general comments stated. Should the Council wish further
information in this area, please direct us accordingly.
5) Pages 6, 7 and 8, Section C - is a reasonable interpretation
of the applicant's proceeding.
Page 8 of Mr. Malkerson's March 31, 1983, letter states the request
is to plat the five lots as "approved" by the City on March 91 1981.
Current request is to consolidate the five lots into four lots as
shown on the last page (exhibit J) of Mr. Malkerson's letter.
Staff Comments on Proposal
1) Chapter 48 does allow processing coextensively a subdivision
with the wetland alteration permit.
2) Plat includes a wetland within Lot 1, Block 1 (parcel is
I currently a separate parcel of record). Any development
E. will require an alteration permit before issuance of a
building permit.
MEMO on Miller Final Plat
Page 2
March 31, 1983
3) Lots 2 and 3, Block 2, contain portions of the existing
wetland buffer area but does not contain any wetland.
4) If plat is considered then:
a) Wetland in Lot 1, Block 1, should be covered by an
easement.
b) Will execution of plat convey any increase to implied
"use" of Lot 1, Block l?
c) Criteria of Chapter 49A need to be met.
5) Does the Council with to extend deadline for preliminary
plat or should the Miller's be required to start over at
the beginning?
JCJ/bc
Attachments
PROCEEDINGS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA
• Special Meeting
December 10, 1980
Mounds View City Nall
2401 Hwy. 10, Mounds View MN 55112
The Mounds View Planning Commission was called to 1. Call to Order
order at 7:30 p.m. on December 10, 1980, by Chairman
Mountin.
McuJjcrs Present: Commi::sionurs McCarthy, Loeding, 2. Roll Call
11udor, Miller, Breske, Glazer, Warren, Chairman
Mountin.
Also Present: Mayor McCarty, Building & Zoning
official Rose.
Members Absent: Haake, unexcused.
Applicant requests approval of preliminary plat 3. Miller Industrial
called Miller Industrial Plat and Rezoning of the Plat - 2400 Co. Rd.
;and which presently has sections of R-1 and B-3 Preliminary Plat Re
to 1-1 for development of an industrial park. Rezoning
Case 47-80
Official Rose reviewed the planning considerations
and previous action of the Planning Commission
beginning with the original Planning Report dated
6/18/80. The letter from Rice Creek Watershed,
Attorney Meyers' report and the City Engineer's
report were not available.
Mr. Miller requested clarification by the Planning
Commission as. to any other questions or requests
for information that might be needed to conclude
deliberation. Fie stated that he is willing to
comply with the comprehensive plan recommendation
Chat the parcel be enLirely I-1 and that he would
be willing to accept a P.U.D. designation.
Chairman Mountin advised Mr. Miller that the City
is developing a wetlands protection ordinance and
that he should be aware that his property may be
significantly affected.
Summary of Discussion:
- The drainage on the southern part of the parcel
is not accurately presented on the site plan
due to missing directional flow arrows.
• - More information is needed on the drainage
into the detention pond in relationship to
the ditches flowing into the pending area.
MOUNDS VIEW PIANNIIIG COMMISSION
special MecGinc
Page 2 0- ,nikuoc k0j 00.6
--------------------------------------------------------------------------•------------
- Requests for considerations by the developer
concerning zoning compatibility with the
comprehensive plan, deleti:^I of the lot that
might be affected by airport zoning, deletion
of the cul-de-sac, adjustment of elevations
on detention pond and drainage ditch that may
be required, and requests for a site plan that
would be contoured to the land.
Motion/Second: Breske/McCarthy - Whereas, reports
from the City ALtorncy and CiLy lingiucur have not
yet been provided to the Planning Commission. Move
that the Miller Industrial Preliminary Plat review
be tabled until thes,• reports are available.
8 ayes 0 nays MOTION CARRIED
Applicant requests approval to construct an accessory 4. James A. Trapp
building which would be in excess of 62 sq. ft. of 8018 Sunnsyide Rd
the City's maximum allowance of 21G sq. ft. Variance
Case 71-80
Official Rose presented the Planninq Considerations
regarding Code 40.04 Subd. D (4), Mr. Trapp's state-
ment of hardship, and staff recommnendations.
Mution/Second: Pudor/McCarthy moved Lo Lable Mr.
Trapp's request for variance and to direct staff to �
provide the Commission with information to compare
our present code requirements with surrounding
communities and considerations for a possible code
revision.
8 ayes 0 nays MOTION CARRIED
Applicant requests approval, of rezoning of his 5. Donald Spagenski
property from R-1 to R-2. 2415 Co. Rd. I
Rezoning (R-1 to F
Case 70-80
Official Rose presented the Planning Considerations
regarding comprehensive plan compatibility, lot size
requirements, and staff recommendations.
The Planning Commission reviewed a similar request in
March of 1979. The City Council never officially
reviewed the request as it was withdrawn by the applicant.
Robert A. Bartkus was present to represent Mr. Spagenski.
Motion/Second: Warren/Mountie moved to recommend to
the City Council approval of the request for rezoning
at 2415 County Road I, Case 70-80, from R-1 to R-2. V
2 ayes 5 nays MOTION FAILS
•
pROCEliD1NGS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
CITY OF MOUNDS VIED
ItAMSi.Y COUNTY, MINNESOTA
Regular Meeting
January 7, 1981
Mounds View City Hall
2..401 Hwy. 10, Mounds View MN 55112
The Mounds View I'lanuinq Commission was called to
order at 7:35 p.m. on January 7, 1981, by Chairman
Mountin.
Members Present: Cuimnissioners McCarthy, Loading, Fedor
Miller., Breske, Glazer, Warren, Chairman Mountin.
Also Present: Councilmember Forslund, Building and
Zoning Official Rose, Mayor McCarty, City.Consulting
Hngineer Boxrud.
Members Absent: None
Commissioner 11aake has retired from the Planning
Commission. She has been a member of the Commission
since 1972 and served as Chairman for six years. We
wish to thank her for her civic -minded service to the
community.
1. Call to Order
2, Roll Call
Correction to the Dec. 3, 1980, Minutes: 3. Approval of the Dec. 31
1980 and Dec. 10, 1980
Luediug: pal. 1, (Lem 2, Roll Call Mintues.
Also Present: Councilmomber (lodges and
Mayor McCarty.
Motion/Second:. McCarthy/Loeding moved to approve the
minutes of December 3, 1980, as corrected and the
minutes of December 10, 1986, as written.
8 ayes 0 nays MOTION CARRIED
Motion/Second: Warren/McCarthy moved to adopt 4. Adoption of Resolution
liesulution No. 01-81, LSLablishing Meetings and No. 01-81, Establishing
'rimcline Submission Dates. ( Exhibit A) Meetings and Timeline
Submission Dates
8 apes 0 nays
Applicant requests approval of preliminary plat called 5. Miller Industrial Plat
Millar Industrial Plat, and rezoning of the land which 2400 County Road J
presently has sections of R-1 and B-3 to I-1 for Preliminary Plat Review
development of an Industrial Park. (2 lots into 18)
Rezoning R-1 and B-3 to
I-1, Case 47-80
official Rose had no .additional material Lo present Lo
the Commission.
MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION Regular Meeting
Page 2
January 7, 1981
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Planning Commission tabled the request December
_S I". 1960, pending receipt of reports from the City
c "LLorney and City Engineer.
r1
' Allrnrnoy Meyers mat with the Commission December
22, 1980.
Consulting Engineer Boxrud reviewed the applicant's
revised drainage plan received January 2, 1981 and
Short-Elliott-Ilendrickson recommendations.
Applicant Miller introduced his attorney, Bruce Malkerson,
Engineer Gary Comstock, and son Jim Miller.
Mution/Second: Fedor/McCarthy moved to take the Miller
proposal, Case 47-80, frum the table.
8 ayes 0 nays MOTION CARRIED
Coimnissioner Loeding cited Chapter 42 of the Municipal
rudr rlaLing the the zoning should be resolved prior to
subdivision of the parcel.
Tile Commission discussed the desirability of a P.U.D.
designation on the parcel.
Mt. Miller stated that lie is not in favor of the P.U.D.;
Mr. Malkerson noted that they would not be opposed to r�
the language in the resolution recommending such action
3 to the Council.
Mot.iou/Second: Loudiug/McCarthy moved to approved Husolu-
t.ion No. 02-81, recommending rezoning of. Miller Industrial
? Plat, as amended. (Exhibit B)
' 7 ayes 1 nay MOTION CARRIED
Nay Vote:
t
Glazer: Stated that he felt that the wetland cannot
be adequately protected by a blanket rezoning
It
of the parcel.
Motion/Second: Loeding/Miller moved to adopt Resolution
No. 03-81 (Exhibit C ) recommending denial of the
j Preliminary Miller Industrial Plat.
1 ayes 5 Nays MOTION FAILS
Nay Votes:
Breske: 1) Is concerned about it and wants to
preserve wetlands but for a reasonable
purpose. In this case for aesthetic
reasons, not recreational. To enhance
the development.
MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION,
,Page 3
Nay Votes (cont.):
i. Breske: 2) Feels adequate study has been given
1 to the proposal by the Planning
Co nlssion.
3) Developer shouldn't be put off any
longer.
4) To insure cooperative development
between the City and the developer.
Wu ucud Lo make a positive recomnenda-
Lion and provide support for r(lcummcu-
dation and our concerns 'to the Council..
Glazer: Feels that the second part of the resolu-
tion is superfluous, but does agree with
the reconuncndation to dolly.
Warren: We have given adequate study to the
proposal, that we should list our
reconnendations to the Council regarding
wetlands, reads, fire protection, ctc,
that we should pas- this proposal oil to
the Council for their consideration.
{ Fedor: Cannot support a denial and apprnval
combination in the same muLion.
,1 Muuntin: Concurs with previous staLameoLu.
MuLion/Second: Breske/Warren moved Lo adupt kvsolu-
Lion No. 03-01 (Exhibit D ) rocoumondiny approval
of the Preliminary Miller Industrial Plat.
4 ayes 4 Nay::
Nay Votes:
Millur: Thu wu land plutuclion lu-uv nhuuld be
reoolved before the parcel in nuJntivld(!d.
Glazert Agrees with thu duvolopur that I'.II,D, dunignation
in not lu L.ho bunt iltturuuL❑ of the City or
the duvelupor and In IIoL able Lo m,lku ,:
recununrm .11 il): wilhout Imnwinq Lill, ;+oolnq.
Luedingl A vote for nuhdivinlon lu a voLu againsL
prunurvJny thu wot.lnnd.
Tudor: I'0U)11 01,11 our oPlJolln in protection of
thu woL1,:11d would hu mL:lm,11 once lhu
' parcul Ill nuhdivldud.
n'oyulAr Meeting
January 7, 1901
MOTION FAILS
MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION
Page 4 Regular Meeting
January
•,1981
--------------- _ -------------------------
Motion/Second: Locdinq/McCarthy moved to adopt Rosa- T 1u t.on Ao. UJ_81 (I :hi.bi.l L•') recommending a denial of
t:he prnpn:;od prolimin-n'Y Miller Tndur,Lri.il Plat.
6 ayes 2 nays A
Nay Votes: MOTION CARRIED
$ Dreske: peels that he musL remain consistent
yt�1 with his position favoring the subdi-
vision of tl:e parcel.
MounLin: Concurs
Motion/Second: l.oeding/Warren moved to recommend
that Council not take action on the Miller
Prolwsal until they have received and reviewed the
Planning Commission minutes which indicate the
concerns of the ceimni::::iuneru.
8 ayes 0 nays
• MOTION CARRIED
Official Rose noted that the applicant was not ready to appear before Lhe (uuunis::iott and re 6. Robert Eigenheer
hi:; prolrosal be t.,tbled. requested LhaL 2381 County Road I
Major Subdivision
(1 lot into 20)
Case 65-80
Motion_ /end: Glazer/Breske moved to table the
Robert Eigenheer request for major subdivision,
Cnsc 65-80, until February 4, 1981, per the developer's
request.
8 ayes 0 nays
MOTION CARRIED
Motion/Second: Mi.11e"AcCarthy moved to Lable
agenda items 7 and 8 until the next regularly 7• Storage Building
scheduled agenda meeting. Size Review
8 ayes 0 nays S. Ordinance Review of
Light Industrial E
Park Usage I
MOTION CARRIED
Motion/Second: Dreske/Glazer moved to recommend
adopLiou of Amended Chapter 32 and By -Laws, final
draft: 12/23/80, to ti:e City Council.
6 ayes 2 nays
Nay Votes: MOTION CARRIED
Loeding: Disagrees with the election of the
chairman by the Commission and the j
Provision for remuneration. I`�``
Warren: Concors
MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION 110, 03-8I
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSE'Y
STATE' OF MINNE.L;0TA
MOTION CONCERNING RE -QUEST FOR SUBDIVISION
CASE 47-80 (MILLER INDUSTRIAL PLAT)
WIIEREAS, it is generally recognized that wetlands can consti-
tute important• physical, aesthetic, recreational and economic assets
of existing and future residents of the community; and
WHEREAS, a letter dated April 2, 1980, from the Department of
Natural Resources to the subdivider, Mr. John A. Miller, indicates
that the property bounded by Minnesota Trunk Highway #10, County Road
J and Judicial Ditch 11 is a Type II wetland; and
WHEREAS, tl:e Mounds View Comprehensive Plan states the following
under Industrial Goals and Policies: "Industrial development shall
be prohibited on wetlands, flood plains, shoreline, and other natural
features that perform important public protection functions in their
natural state."; and
WHEREAS, the proposed subdivision holds a substantial portion
of the remaining wetlands in Mounds View; and
WHE'RRAS, the attachment to the preliminary plat entitled
"Drainage Plan" (received by the City on January 2, 1981) shows that
the existing wetlands would essentially be eliminated through filling
if the proposed subdivision were to be approved;
NOW, 'I'IIEREFORE, BIi IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning
Commission that tl:e following are recommended to the City Council:
1) That the subdivision shown on the preliminary plat
(revised 11/14/80) and attached drainage plan, received
January 21 1981, be denied as proposed.
2) That the City Council determine which portions of the
wetlands on the cited property should be protected and
preserved in the public interest before consideration
is given to alternative proposals by the subdivider.
Adopted this 7th day of January, 1981, as Exhibit E.
ATTEST:
M
(SEAL)
MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Public Works/Community Development Director
DATE: March 31, 1983
SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT REQUEST AND WETLAND ALTERATION PERMIT FOR
LOTS 3 AND 4, BLOCK 2, PARK VIEW TERRACE BY DYNAMIC
DESIGNERS
Dynamic Designers has submitted a request to build two fourplex
buildings with detached garages on the referenced lots. The lots
are located within a wetland controlled by Chapter 48.
History
1. Original application for development of two fourplex units was
made on October 29, 1979.
2. The Planning Commission reviewed the application on November 7,
1979, and requested more information (minutes are attached).
3. The Planning Commission continued its review on December 19,
1979, and the application was defeated by vote on a approving
motion (minutes are attached).
4. Staff requested Council assistance with the matter on January
14, 1980 (minutes are attached).
5. Staff reviewed with the Council on February 25, 1980, the status
of the application. It was tabled for Rice Creek Watershed
District input until April 14, 1980 (minutes are attached).
6. No additional action took place until May 27, 1980, at which
time the Council stated they would not review the proposal until
Rice Creek Watershed District had approved the drainage proposal
for the application (minutes are attached).
7. Staff informed the Council on July 28, 19B0, that Rice Creek
Watershed District had rescinded previous approval of the drain-
age proposal for the application (minutes are attached).
8. Reminder of a meeting with Dynamic Designers and Rice Creek
Watershed District was given at a Council meeting on July 25,
1980. The meeting was to be held on September 2, 1980. A
letter of invite was sent to Rice Creek Watershed District
(minutes and letter are attached).
9. The September 2, 1980, meeting did occur and overall solutions
were discussed for the whole area.
10. The matter was discussed again at the next agenda session
(agenda attached).
MEMO on Dynamic Designers
Page 2
March 31, 1903
11. Staff received and discussed with the Council on September 22,
1980, a proposal from Short-Elliott-liendrickson regarding the
overall drainage and scheduled a meeting with all the affected
property owners (attached are Council minutes and S.E.H. materi-
als, 2 sheets).
12. The meeting with staff and the property owners was held on
September 24, 1980, and the general concensus was approval of
a shared drainage system and overall plan.
13. On October 14, 1980, pursuant to all of the above, the Council
authorized execution of a development agreement with Dynamic
Designers (minutes are attached).
14. The applicant applied for a partial building permit on November
7, 1980, and paid the City $3,000.00.
15. The applicant later on February 26, 1981, submitted a bond for
escrow as required by Developr,:nt Agreement No. 80-40 with the
City.
16. On October 9, 1981, the applicant requested refund of the $3,000.00
(see attached letter).
17. The City on October 13, 1981, passed Resolution No. 1373 rescind-
ing development agreement approval and authorized refund (see
attached resolution).
18. On September 9, 1982, the applicant applied for a request for an
interpretation of dry -buildable under Ordinance No. 301.
19. On September 27, 1982, the City Council passed Resolution No.
1495 denying the development request (see attached resolution).
Alteration Permit
The wetland as mapped in Chapter 48 (does not include fill placed by
developer) has the following factors;
Total Drainage Area 9.357 acres
Total Wetland Area 3.248 acres
Portion of Wetland'Owned by Applicant 0.530 acres
Wetland Storage Volume 4.009 acre-feet
100 Year, 24 flour Storm Runoff 3.649 acre-feet A
Total Phosphorus Generated Per Year 21.1 pounds �I
by Drainage Basin
MEMO on Dynamic Designers
Page 3
March 31, 1983
Phosphorus Assimilation Capacity Per 36.4 pounds
Year
In 1979 the applicant requested approval to fill a portion of the
wetland. Approval was given but the development agreement was never
completely executed and subsequently was withdrawn by applicant.
Prior to withdrawalof application, fill was placed on the lots in
question. This fill altered the wetland as follows:
Reduced Total Wetland Area by: 0.210 acres
Reduced Total Wetland Storage 0.203 acre-feet
volume by:
Reduced Phosphorus Assimilation 2.52 pounds
Capacity Per Year by:
Issues to be Resolved
1. Should the wetland boundary be changed to conform with existing
topo?
2. Can sites support two fourplex buildings or should provisions
of 48.06, Subdivision CAM) be exercised?
3. The "existing dry -buildable" (recent fill) is entirely within
the 100 foot wetland buffer area, therefore, a setback variance
will be necessary.
4. Applicant proposes to fill an additional 0.250 to 0.297 acres
of wetland. Will this be allowed?
5. Site is in floodplain and, therefore, will requirs conditional
use permit for additional fill. Fill will result in rise of
100 year, 24 hour flood level, therefore, is contrary to 49.04,
Subdivision 3(a and b).
6. Proposal anticipates using the wetland to meet some of the deten-
tion requirements of Chapter 49A (Resolution No. 983).
7. What is the next step in review process?
a) Refer to Planning Commission.
b) Act on some issues and refer balance to Planning
Commission.
c) Reject Application.
The above review comments were prepared after consultation with
• Attorney Meyers.
ici/bc
MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION Regular Meeting
Pages November 1, 1979
Raake made the motion, seconded by Blanchard
to deny the variance allowing a 29' driveway
for Mr. Maunu, 2701 Ardan Avenue.
5 ayes
2 nays
(Nay votes: Fedor, Glazer
Reason: Glazer feels the 7' x 10' strip of
land created by this action is worthless.
Fedor believes the homeowner has a hardship
in that his garage is located 30' from the
street and a 22' driveway does not allow
maneuverability --he favors leaving as is.)
Mr. James Cepress and Mr. Art Fretag,
7. DYNAMIC DEVELOPERS
owners, were present.
7656 6 7658 WOODLAWN DR.
DEVELOPMENT CONTROLS
The applicants are requesting to develop two
R-3 DEVELOPMENT
lots with two four-plexes. Zoning denotes
Case 43-79
the area as R-3 and the comprehensive land
use plan denotes high density. They propose
to build the two 62' x 48' four-plexes with
46' x 24' garages, sharing a common access.
Staff is having a problem with the proposed
elevation of ponding areas. Two more parking
spaces are required for each structure. The
minimum open space requirements of 625 sq. ft.
per unit are met.
Rose recommended consideration of this matter
be delayed to the next session, since the
developers have additional homework to do
regarding'- meeting requirements of res.0983.
Burmeister made the motion, seconded by Glazer,
to table until Planning Commission has further
information on this property, especially in
the drainage area.
7 ayes
U nays
Staff advised the next regular session will be
November 28 with a special session November 14.
A discussion took place regarding the apparent
oversight resulting in non -continuance of the
old code section pertaining the division of
160' lots. Since no agreement was reached,
cases that arise will have to be treated
individually.
Burmeister made the motion, seconded by
Preemore, to adjourn the meeting at 10:00 PM.
Respectfully submitted,
PROCEEDINGS 01' THE PLANNING COMMfSSTON
CITY 01' MOUNDS VIEW
• 16114SEY COUNTY, MINNESU'I'A
Regular Meeting
December 19, 1979
Mounds View City Hall
------------------------ 2401-Hwy_-10,-Mounds View, MN 55112
----------------------- _ !
Mounds View Planning Commission was called to
order at 7:45 PM, December 19, 1979, by Chair-
person Naake.
Members Present: Chairperson Haake, Commission 1.
ROLL CALL OF COMMISSIONERS
Members Blanchard, Burmeister, Fedor, Freemore,
Glazer, Goebel, McCarthy
Members Absent: Mountin (illness)
Also Present: Building 6 Zoning Official Rose
Planning Commission accepted the 11/7/79 minutes 2.
APPROVAL OF•11/7/79 MINUTES
as submitted.
The developers request to develop two lots with 3.
DYNAMIC DEVELOPERS
two four-plexes. Zoning denotes the area R-3 and
7656 G 7658 Woodlawn Dr.
the comprehensive land use plan denotes high density,
Development Controls (R-3)
which are in agreement with the prnpnnal. The 62' x
Pa;:r 43-79
28' four-plexes with 116' x 24' garages will share a
i common egress, which will require joint covenants of
driveway usage and maintenance to be filed with the
County. The revised site plan meets parking re-
�,i quirements. Both plot plans meet minimum open
space requirements of 625 square feet per unit.
Sewer and water services are stubbed to both lots.
Individual services to the property line will be
re-quired
for each water meter. The present storm
sewer system is estimated inadequate for a three year
storm, according to the BSE11 report. The proposed
pending will require two modifications in order to
} meet the requirements of Resolution 11903: 1) Eleva-
tions of pending and buildings should be raised lk'
i
or 2) ponds should drain to a common point behind
the center opening; of the two garages by mcann of
i a Ill -PVC pipe. Deveiopmw;t agreement rcq;:.rr.:a..nts
are: 1) $10,000 bonding letter of credit, 2) con-
crete curb and sidewalks, 3) marked parking spaces,
4) minimum of 3 plantings, and 5) covenants for
joint access usage.
Applicants, Mr. Art rretag and Mr. James Cepress,
joined the meeting aL U:15 1114.
Blanchard moved to remove the matter of Dynamic
Developers from the table. Tt wat; seconded by
McCarthy.
0 ayes
The motion carried+. 0 nav"
MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION Regular Meeting
page 3 -- --December 19,-1979
----------------------------- ----
Fedor stated the re.n:w; for voting nay on the. 3. DYNAMIC DEVELOPERS (cont.)
main motion was because he foresees all kinds of
problems created Ily Iovelollmuni. of Ihi:: mdrgival
area. Burmeister stated she wants to see what the
City foresees for the area as to how it should be
developed. Glazer concurred.
Glazer moved to recommend to Council they con-
sider purchasing this property with the intent of
preserving an existing water detention basin. If
study proves this detention basin can be modified
or reduced in size, I would recommend ,the Council
-
pass this information back to the Planning Commis-
hi
sion so as to reconsider this development. It was
seconded by Fedor.;
4 ayes
;;
The motion fails. 4 nays
(Nay votes: McCarthy, Itaake,
Blanchard and Goebel)
Goebel gave his reason for voting nay was because
he believes these developers have complied with
the requirements of the City.
Burmeister moved to amend the motion that Planning
Commission would like to have the Council direct:
staff, or an appropriate body, to do a study of
natural drainage area:: that will have to be rc-
tained in the City and not be built upon. It was
seconded by Freemore.
Saye.,^,
The amendment failed because 3 nays
the main motion failed.
(Nay votes; McCarthy, Blanchard, Goebel)
Haake advised the developers that their request
could go before the City Ccuncil for their approval.
Mr. Fretag wanted it on record and communicated to
Council that they have followed explicitly what
the law requires.
Haake moved that Council direct qualified pro-
fcosienel experts in whatever they feel necessary
to come up with a plan for Mounds View regarding
wetlands, flood plains, holding, areas, and green-
belt areas. They should bear in mind the need of
these areas to be pre^crvcd so as to answer our
storm sewer problems also. The Planning Commis-
sion can then continue in our directive of
drawing up a comprehensive plan for Mounds View,
enabling us to logically designate City land use.
In the interim, we want these qualified proves- i
sional experts to romp up with tentative sites they
would consider for possible solution to our, problem.
It was seconded by Burmeister. 8 ayes
0 nays
HOUNDS VIEW PLANNING CU141•tIS^.ION
Page 2
-----------------------------------------------------
The mail] area of discussiuo 11.11 to do with
drainage, i.c., adequacy of the pending ru^aas and
diking, rate of release or held water In the event
of an abnormally heavy rainfall, and installation
+• of a new outlet of 099.0 or lower an recommended
by the BSEIi report.
Mr. rretag registered his displeasure at having
to spend $2500 to survey the watershed district
In order to determine how much water goes to the
storage area. He further slated that normally
the City provides this information for him. He
said they would cooperate with the City's require-
ments.
Haake moved to recommend to Council approval of
the development of the two lots located at 7656 6
7650 Woodlawn Drive into two four-plcxes, as
6 shown on the site plan dated 12/4/79, presented to
;l us tonight, 12/19/79. The plan adheres to the re-
quirements of Resolution #9B3. This approval is
contingent upon the following requirements being
made:
1. Bonding letter of credit in the amount of
J $10,000.
' 2. Concrete curb and sidewalks required.
3. Marked parking spaces.
4. Minimum 3 plal]tings, 2" at breast height
I per lot.
S. Cuveuants ul joint usage for access el]
each lot for ttse and maintenance in a form
approved by the City Attorney.
;f 6. Addition of covenanted dikes to be placed
on sites as presented on the site plan.
7. Drainage and plot plan indicate elevations
' of ponds and buildings be raised 1.5'
if higher.
I^ 8. A 4" PVC drain be installed behind and
between the proposed garages with ponds
r draining at that point.
Tt wan seconded by enmmission Member Blanchard.
The motion failed. 3 ayes
5 nays
j (Nay votes: McCarthy, Freemore, Fedor,
l; Burmeister and Glazer)
Goebel moved to amend the motion that the 4"
PVC pipe should have a check valve installed re
prevent re-entry of water From outside the
property. It was seconded by McCarthy.
8 ayes
►i Amendment fails becaede the main 0 nays
5 motion failed.
it
Regular Meeting
Ilecember 19, 1979
-------------------
3. DYNAMIC UL'VCLOPERS (cont.)
a
MOUNDS VIL•W PLANNING COMMIS51011
}IwA-----------------------------
Regular Meeting
December 19, 1479
-------------
Burmeister stressed, for the rcrrwd, that since
Planning Commission i:s in the In ucc:;: of doing the
comprehensive plan dealing with land that in avail-
able to build on in questionable arras, it is im-
perative that Council deal with the problem
immediately.
Goebel requested thL+ be the nubjer:t at a joint
meeting with Council, preferrably an agenda
session.
Planning Commission decided to cancel the meeting
for December 26, 1979. January 21 1980, will be
the next regular meeting.
Goebel moved to adjourn the meeting at 9:55 PM.
It was seconded by Burmeister.
8 ayes
0 nays
3. DYNAMIC DEVELOPERS (cont.)
4. NCXI' AGENDA b PREVIOUS
CITY COUNCIL ACTIONS
Respectfully submitted,
Steven A. Rose
Building 6 'Zoning Official
I
HOUNDS VIEW CITY COUNCIL Reguj,ati Meeting
Page 5 January le,s 19g0
................................................. ................
.wwz
3) Staff requested directio❑ on develop- 6. REPORTS --ADMINISTRATOR
ment controls for Dynamic Developers. (Continued)
The PI nniag Commission had sent the - Dynamic Developers
matter to Council after a 4-4 vote. They
request designation of proposed holding
ponds in order to set guidelines.
Forelund moved to meet on Tuesday, 1/22
and Tuesday, 1/29, in the Council Chambers
at 7:00 PM in order to develop basic
overall goals for the City, including
designation of wetlands.
5 ayes
The motion carried. 0 nays
A discussion took place regarding when the
meetings could be held and what they would
encompass,
Rowley calledthe previous question. It
was seconded by Ziebarth.
5 ayes
The motion carried. 0 nays
4) Reminded Council they should review
the front footage ordinance. Attorney
Meyers will review first.
5) Re: release of funds as development
projects are completed --will be discussed
at the 1/21 agenda session.
6) Re: property up for tax forfeit --the
Mayor requested more details before any
action can take place.
7) Will submit for discussion on 1/21
the subject of suburban police recruitment
program for interviewing applicants at
the direction of Civil Service and Council.
Mayor requested a cost breakdown.
8) Handed out information re: possible
City bike/walkway projects.
9) Police Chief needs additional money
to jutfit the new patrolmen.
McCarty moved that the Police Chief be
allowed to transfer the 1979 uniform
allowance to 1980 in the amount of $144.
It was seconded by Ziebarth.
5 ayes
it, The motion carried. 0 nays
MOUNDS VIEW CITY COUNCIL
Page 8
--------------------------------
wire happy with the work product that
I oy had received. No action was
..:.on by the City Council.
Cable Television Commission had met
and the Council would be receiving
their minutes in the future.
Regular Meeting
rebruµ}.. 28,, k980
---------------------------
20. CABLE CABLE TELEVISION COMMISSION
March 3rd Agenda Scssion. Council 21. MARCH 3rd AGENDA SESSION
requested that the short item be
placed on the Agenda first in order
to dispense with them early on in the
evening.
Inspector's Report. Nelson noted that 22. INSPECTOR'S REPORT
the Building 6 Zoning Administrator
was home due to illness and therefore,
he would be making his report.
Nelson reviewed with the City Council
the status of the Dynamic Developer
Application. After much discussion
it was noted that the watershed would
be reviewing the matter during the
month of March. There was no action
that the City Council felt they could
take at this time. Mayor moved to
delay action on Dynamic Developers
until April 14th at 7:40 P.M. Ziebarth
seconded the motion.
4 ayes
motion carried. 0 nays
23. DYNAMIC DEVELOPERS
The City Attorney brought to the 24. ATTORNEY'S REPORT
attention of the City Council that he
received a document requesting indus-
trial revenue bonding for Karley Foundry.
He noted that the Staff needed to review
this before presenting something to the
City Council. No action was taken.
The Attorney also brought up a
question regarding North Star Speedway
property and what the status was on
that matter. It was noted by Nelson
that the City was still waiting for
a report back from Short -Elliott -
Hendrickson on the property. No action
was taken by the City Council.
25. NORTH STAR SPEEDWAY
C,
•
MOUNDS VIEW CITY COUNCIL
PAGE 8
4'4ular, Meeting
rmou O t � m
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------•-
• the contractor and bring this to the Council
or approval.
lebarth made a motion, seconded by Rowley,
o extend the meeting time adjournment to
1:30 P.M q r t e Council meeting this
vemng
yes-5
lays-0
MOTION CARRIES
lodges made a motion, seconded by Forslund,
�o approve the additional $21675.72 to complete
the project and these monies shall be taken
from the contingency fund.
Ayes-5
Nays-0
MOTION CARRIES
lfficial Rose noted that correspondence 'from
JNR indicated that the Sunrise United Methodist
Church did not need a permit from them for filling
and grading.
,fficial Rose also noted the correspondence from
Spring Lake Park indicating their decision not to
participate in the cost of the study for the
drainage problem at 8280 Pleasant View Drive.
Council asked Official Rose to notify Mr. Sandahl.
Official Rose called the Council's attention to the
letter from Dynamic Developers dated May 13, 1980
asking to be included on the Council agenda for
their proposal (Case 43-79). Council agreed that
no action could be taken before the permits were
granted, and,therefore, it would not be beneficial
to come before Council until the permits were in hand.
12. TIME LIMIT SET FOR MEETING
(NOTION CARRIES)
13 APPROVAL OF PROJECT CONTRACT 1980-3SEALE
NDMENT
FORCOATIN(
(MOTION CARRIES)
14. REPORT OF THE BUILDING AND
ZONING OFFICIAL
15. REPORT OF THE CITY ATTORNEY
Attorney Meyers reported that the Brighton Veterinarian
Hospital had increased their rates, effective February,
1980. Since the City has a contract with this company,
the contract should be amended to reflect these changes.
Attorney Meyers will refer this back to Don Brager,
Finance Director.
Attorney Meyers also suggested that a special meeting
be held to discuss the long term financial plan with
Don Brager, Finance Director. This meeting will be set
for Tuesday, June 17, at 7:00 P.M.
Attorney Meyers also suggested discussing the MSA funding
at the June 2nd agenda session,
Attorney Meyers noted the drodline for applications for
MOUNDS VIEW CITY COUNCIL Regular 40.ft qA
Page Seven July 28, 980
Ziebarth: ,
-He noted that the accident at the Festivities
Day was slight -minor injury to a teenage boy.
McCarty
-The City newsletter will come out this week.
McCarty made a motion, seconded by Ziebarth to appoint
Joe Christy to the Lakeside Park Commission for a term
of three years.
Ayes-4 THE MOTION WAS CARRIED. (MOTION CARRIES)
Nays-0
.The Ardan Avenue ditch will be cleaned out a week
from today.
-The city attorney will be out of town until Aug. llth. 15. REPORT OF THE ACTING
-The City Council is holding final• interviews for the CLERK ADMINISTRATOR ANDER
clerk administrator position.
Official Rose noted he has received word that the 16. REPORT OF BUILDING AND
Rice Creek Watershed District has rescinded their ZONING OFFICIAL
original approval of the Dynamic Developer's proposal.
Rose will report back to the Council further developments. '
Forslund made a motion, seconded by Rowley to 17. ADJOURNMENT
adjourn the July 28, 1980 meeting.
Ayes-4 THE MOTION WAS CARRIED. (MOTION CARRIES)
Nays-0
The meeting adjourned at 11:04 P.M.
--oVlle.
Bruce K.
Acting C
/ret
lv s
iiA6�Alar Meeting
MOUNDS VIEW CITY COU14CII. August, 2!yj i4tr
Page 6
TY BRI
Acting Clerk -Administrator Anderson noted that 11. PICK-UP ANUICHIPP
Othe project is tnl(ing lon;;ur than was expected. SERVICE
At the current rate, it would take at least an
additional three weeks to complete the project.
He also noted that the part-time CETA crew would
be done working with the City on August 29, 1980,
so city personnel would have to be pulled off
other jobs to complete thu project. Anderson
proposed to Council to I)e);in a 13-hour split shift
program to increase the efficiency of the existing
chipping operation.
The Council agreed that the project should be completed
ld
ely
cas soon as ommendationsstoble and expediateuthertask n Staff s re -
MOTION:
McCarty made a motion, seconded by Ziebarth,
to authorize staff to rent two chippers for
another additi900.0
onal to takat a cost Of en $taken from thecontingency
fund. 140'TIO14 CARRIES
Ayes-4 rJaYs-U
® 12.'1' ACRES REZOJd
The first reading of Ordinance !;296 was read OF OF11-1
�usC 11 1980 City R-1 TOIt-2
Mayor McCarty at the Aul, . ORDINANCE #296
Council meeting. The I4ayor proceeded with the
second reading, after which the following motion
was made:
140TION:
Forslund made a motion, seconded by Ziebarth,
to adopt ordinance #296 (which amends the
Municipal Code of I•iounds View byamending
Chapter 41 entitled Rezonings Sp
Lake Park Ilillview is rer.oned from 11-1 to It-2).
Ayes-Forslund, Rowley,
Ziebarth, McCarty I-IOTI011 CARRIES
Nays-0
Official hose:
13. I(1•'PORT OF THE DUI L!
AND ZONIGO OFFICIA
1, 1•l & 1: Realty, Kraus -Anderson ABrcemont,
has received the five items discussed by
the Council at their last agenda session
and 14 b E are in agreement with the pro-
posed changes. They will provide Council
with a draft including the changes.
2. A reminder: Dynamic
cnDev agenda lopers arcsesgoing.
to be attending th
to detnt`mine an n for :1 nomprehcnstvn
oolution to the rty j''"L ofi' woodlawn
Drive by Droneon & Long Labe Road and County
Cif 0• � VOM S 4
IIAMS1 Y CUUN I Y. MINNE SO IA
7401 111011'SAY 10
1.10UN11SVIFRIAINN Y,119
August 20,1980
Pete R. Willenbring
Civil Engineer
Rice Creek Watershed District
C/O Arden Hills
1450 W. Hwy. 96
Arden Hills, Mn. 55112
RE: Rice Creek Water Shed District permit no. 80-15
Mounds View Case No. 43-79
Dear Mr. Willenbring:
The Council at their August 18, 1980 meeting Agenda Session re-
viewed the Boards action in regard to the above mentioned appli-
cation. Upon completion of this reviewal and update they have
requested a joint meeting between a member form Rice Creek Water
Shed District, the applicant and the city to meet on September
2, 1990 at 7:00 pm. This meeting is to review Rice Creek Water
Shed's recent action, the applicants proposal, and the City's
requirements as they pertain to storm water run-off. I hereby
formally request that you or a representative attend this meet-
ing to assist the City in its review process. Should you have
any questions regarding this matter please contact me at my
office.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
HE CITY jOP MOUNDS�jVIEW
Steven A. Rose
Building and Zoning Official
SAR/cp
J
•�
AGENDA SESSION
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
September 15, 1980
SPECIAL MEETING - 7:00 p.m. - First Reading of Ordinance No. 297
—'—" Disposition of City Property
Agenda Session Items
1. Wolf & Associates - Tax Exempt Mortgages and Development
Agreement Approval
2. Presentation by Police Chief Grabowski and Tim Smith regarding
the Mounds View Civil Defense Organization
3. Report from City Administrator Pauley and Public Works Director
® Decheine regarding sale of surplus vehicles
4. Establish program for recognition of Local Government Day
5. Dynamic Developer - Update and Report from Short -Elliott -Hendrickson
6. Kraus-Anderson/M & E Reality Agreement - Update
7. Review of Ordinance No. 110 - Peddlers/Solicitors/Transient Merchant
8. Municipal State Aid Street System Construction Fund
9. Status of Energy Audits
10. Status of Topographical Map/Flood Insurance Study
11. 2701 Ardan Avenue Variance
12. Reapportionment of Assessments - Bayport Acres
13. Review of Resolution No. 1153 - Policy for Usage of City Hall
Community Room
14. Report from Staff on Chipper equipment and recommendation on
potential purchase
15.
Tax
Forfeited
Properties
16.
HUD
Referral
- Section 8 Housing Application
17. water Meter Re4ders fr1980
E
i•iOlitlDl: VIHIc CITY (1,011i1Cii' optec„�%;r 22
Regular ..ccti.11g ,193U
a;;c mix
------------------------------------------------------------------
Official ;;o.r.:
1. Nrati:;/;,nder:;011 have appliedr for ^'ILL(ii(i Ai,
a contractor's license for ;;ennral0r1,�I.
conLractinf, i.n :sounds View.
Hoo,;es made a motion, seconded by
:.iebarth, to approve. the contractor's
license for !;raus/Anderson ;ompany.
AyPL;-5
i lay s-0
THE 110TIOI: CAjf (111-.
2, Lrooi.s :luperette has applied for
licensure.
FOM;lund ,;lade a notion, seconded by
;Siebarth, to approve the licerisure for
:.rooks Superette, Inc., for l;aaoline,
ci„arette, and 3/2 off sale,
.Ves-5
a -0
Tilli ;,'JTJ'Oi; CAliltIlib,
3. ..Lal'f (Dan Coxrud, Don Pauley, ';teve Nose)
arc Mcctilll; wiLh l:ynamic Developers
rc:;,rdin;; their drainage proposal on
„e(:ar.uday, L;eptember 24th, at 2:00
4. ri;;" has taken out a permit and expect j
to begin work with regards to their out
building: this next week. The shrub work
=should be completed this fall,
noted that the Unitea :;tatcs Depart-
reni of Interior, Ileritafe Conservation
and !:ecroation ;;ervice, Ann Arbor, iachigan,
i:: re':Iuirinl; the sil:ncu agreement between
::ouude Vicl:' and I(raus/Anderson before any
fund:; can be transferred to thr: CJty of
,!ounds View. This is in reference to the, l'
ilverview Park land acquisition. ;;rues :
Anderson, Parks and Recreation Director,
also noted that although he had received
a verbal confirmation that there should
I
a
4
Emm N
September 16, 1980
City of Mounds View
2401 Highway 10
Mounds View, Minnesota
Attention: Steve Rose
Gentlemen:
SHORT-ELLIOTT-HENDRICKSON, INC-'-"
CONSULTING ENGINEERS i
ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA CHIPPEWA FALLS, WIXC 614 to
RE: MOUNDS VIEW, MINNES A T�
DYNAMIC DEVELOPERS
OUR PILE NO. 77039 6�6V6
55112
Enclosed is a form we feel can be used for an interim easement
over the properties of this small watershed. We expect that
copies of the drainage plan cited in the document would have to
be attached for each signer of the document.
Please review the document and suggest any changes which should
be made to it, so that we can have the document ready when we
meet with the property owners.
Sincerely,
Q2JR. Boxrud
jcj
Enclosure
cc: (w/enc.) Dick Meyers
2W GOPHER Ruti nlNc . »: EAST III ... ,, ROAD • S7 • • : NINNESOTA 55117 - PHONE (612) 461.0272
TO: THE CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
FROM: THE UNDERSIGNED PROPERTY OWNERS
In order to allow for orderly development of our properties at
this time or in the future, we agree to allow the City of Mounds
View to use all of our property lying below the 902.5 elevation
(as shown on the drainage plan prepared by Hedlund Engineering,
dated Revised August 10, 1980) for storm water pending purposes.
This also will allow for construction of a controlled outlet on
the existing 12 inch reinforced concrete storm sewer.
The City of Mounds View will be allowed to use this property for
storm water pending purposes until such time as our property develops
in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Rice Creek Water-
shed District. At that time, formal easements will be dedicated to
the City of Mounds View over that property required to remain as
storm water pending area by the Rice Creek Watershed District for the
City of Mounds View.
In exchange for these storm water pending rights, the City of Mounds
View agrees to allow development of this drainage area in accordance
with the rules and regulations of the Rice Creek Watershed District,
and further agrees to assure the installation of the controlled out-
let structure to the existing storm sewer.
Lot 1, Block 2, Parkview Terrace:
Lot 2, Block 2, Parkview Terrace:
Lot 3, Block 2, Parkview Terrace:
Lot 4, Block 2, Parkview Terrace:
Lot 5, Block 2, Parkview Terrace:
Mayor
0
City Clerk
MOUNDS VIEW CITY COUNCIL
Regular Meeting ----------------
--
• 140TI0N:
McCarty made a motion, secoley nded by Rowley, to
spose Of
authorize AdministratorstrP vehicles
tor vehiclesoin�whatever
the remaining riles:
manner he determined appropriate:
1950 Ford Van Ette
1974 Ford Torino-4 door
1970 Kurd Econoline q door
1976 Plymouth Grand Fury
•)
4_
Oetebnr 14, 1980
Page Fiva
Ayes-5 MOTION CARRIED.
Nays-0
3, He noted the resignation letter from the current
recording secretary, Ruth Tellinghuisen, dated
October 14, 1980.
Mayor McCarty asked the recording secretary if
she would reconsider the resignation if the
various problems noted in the memo could be
addressed and possibly resolved. The recording
secretary, Ruth Tellinghuisen, agreed to this
request. She noted, however, that she would
consider the resignation from the Planning Commission
still to be effective immediately and the Council
to be effective November 1, 1980, unless some
point of resolution was reached before that time.
Pauley noted this would be discussed at the next
Council mooting and the Chairperson of the Planning
Comnissiur, would be asked to attend that discussion.
The Council took a recess at 8:25 P.M.
The Council resumed the meeting at 8:45 P.M.
12.
MOTION:
Forslund made a motion, seconded by Ziebarth,
to remove this item from the table.
"y- .5 MOTION CARRIED.
Nays-u
Official Rose noted that this item was table approval onFebruarory mll,
1980, in order to have the ePP approval has now been
Rice Creek Watershed District. This aPP Ian.
obtained. Official Rose went over the site p
CityOf
Eiiistudy8andutileeconsiderlationsviewed nregarding ;tthc drainage
P
,rows-
There were nN comments bi• questions from the floor.
DYNAMIC DESIGNERS
DEVELOPMENT REQUEST
Case 43-79
It
MOUNDS VIEW CITY COUNCIL
Regular Meeting
October 14, 19so
Page Six
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MOTION:
McCarty made a motion, seconded by Forslund, to
approve Resulul.ion 11R0, Development Agreement
80-40, Dynamic Designers for lots 3 & 4, Block 2,
Parkview Terrace with the addition to the exhibit
of the development agreement of the drainage plan
by C.H. Hedlund, registration N 5942, as revised
on 8-10-80 .
Ayes-5
Nays-0 MOTION CARRIED.
Official Rose reviewed past Planning Commission 13.
action on this request, including a public hearing
held on September 3, 1980. The citizens main concern
was continuing some type of right of way. to the back
of their lots. There currently is an existing 5' utility
easement (as shown on the survey).
Mr. White, who was present at the meeting, noted that
he was willing to give as much of an easement as he
could while still conforming to city codes. Ile noted
that the citizens seemed more in favor of an alley than
a road.
MOTION:
Rowley made a nation, s
approve the subdivision
and form a third parcel
plan surveyed June 11,
5' drainage and utility
each of the following:
North 5' Parcel
South 5' Parcel
North 5' Parcel
North 5' Parcel
East 5' Parcel
econded by Ziebarth, to
of the two lots to combine
as presented on the site
198o; and further, that a
easement be included along
MICHAEL WHITE
SUBDIVISION -MINOR (2 into 3
CASE 61-80
The light pole can remain or be removed at the
expense of Mr. White. Mr. White, the applicant,
has also agreed to place the dwelling to the
southern most lot line of the property on Parcel A,
meeting minimum setback requirements. A special
assessment fee against Parcel A in the amount of
$1,133.91 and the fence will be relocated into Parcel A's
boundary.
Ayes-5
Nays-0 MOTION CARRIED.
4
W Of rNI /l1ASUA1 OF 1111.
• f
� A1N0 O
YHP
iUu HAVr CXOSIN THI DES T j DYNAMIC DESIGNRS
I
2233 West County Road S, Roseville, MN. 55113
October 2, 1931
11r.:;teven A. Rose
City of Pounds View
2401 Highway 10
Mounds View, Minnesota 55112
Re: Building Permit for li•)odlawn Drive - Case No. 113-79 and/or Development
Agreement 80-40.
Dear Mr. Rose:
On November 7, 19K , ;'l1CO .qaa paid to the City of Founds View by our firm as
part of the permit fees for our construction project on Woodlawn Drive.
Due to unusually deep frost last winter, the present housing market conditions,
i.e.; lack of permanent financing for 4-plex units, and high interest on
construction loans, we have dropped our plans for this project. We have no
intentions of working this site in the near or distant future.
Since we are not using the permit, Dynamic Designers is requesting a recur.'. of
the �3000. '
Thank You.
Sincerely yours,
"James L. Cepress, Tres.
559.1110
tAVAA t- F9pf011. gweWpof o124 1-071. Uhur L. Freiag®
luf•Inl. A�, tlNhf1970
RESOLUTION NO. 1371
CUPY OF MOUNDS V11SW
COUNTY OF RAMsxY
STATE OF MINNIit;01'A
1IiS0LUT1UiJ RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 1180 APPROVING
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 80-40 ACID AUTHORIZING
A REFUND 01' FEES PAID
WHEREAS, Lhe CiLy Cuuucil of the City of Mounds View authorized
the execution of Development Agreement 80-40 with Dynamic Designers in
Resolution No. 118U; and
WHEREAS, the permit authorized by Development Agreement 80-40
was never issued by City Staff; and
WHEREAS, Dynamic Designers has paid partial permit fees in the
amount of $3,000.00; and
WHEREAS, Dynamic Designers has requested a refund of permit
fees paid; and
WHEREAS, the City has encumbered expenses in the amount of
$932.20;
NOW, THEREFORE, B8 IT RESOLVED that the City Oouncil of the City
of Mounds View authorizes a refund to Dynamic Designers in the amount
of $2,067.80 and rescinds Resolution No. 1.180 which authorized permit
approval;
BE IT FURTIII;R RESOLVED that tine City Council of the City of Mounds
View will review any future proposal for the property involved in
I)e9.�lnpp;nnt AgrCC,^,nCnF 9�' —1 fin' CxiStifi:j GY flltUYe GrdinanCCs and
resolutions that may pertain when a future development application is
made.
Adopted this 13th day of October, 1.981.
ATTEST:
Mayor
(SEAL)
Clcfk-mintrn or
1
RESOLUTION NO. I495
OCITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEW
STATE' OF MINNRSOTA
RESOLUTION DENYING DEVELOPMENT REQUEST BY DYNAMIC DESIGNERS
WHEREAS, the developer for Dynamic Designers has requested
City Council approval to proceed with construction of two fourplex
dwellings on two lots within Mounds View; and
WHEREAS, portions of these lots lic within areas presently
regulated by Ordinance No. 301 entitled, "An Ordinance Prohibiting
Development of Private Wetlands on an Interim Basis"; and
WHEREAS, following review of the site and data submitted by the
developer, it has been determined that a large amount of fill will be
required within the designated wetland area to accommodate the pro-
posed development; and
WHEREAS, there is an insufficient amount of existing dry/
buildable land to complete the proposed project; and
WHEREAS, any building development that would occur on the
lots would encroach upon the existing wetland;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the
City of Mounds View finds that there is insufficient "dry/buildable"
land within the proposed sites to allow development of the proposed
project and denies the request by Dynamic Designers to proceed with
development based upon the regulations of Ordinance No. 301, amended
by Ordinance No. 305.
Adopted this 27th day of September, 1982.
ATTEST: _
Mayor
(SEAL)
Clerk -A ministrator
MEMO T0: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Director of. Public works/Community Development
DATE: March 31, 1983
SUBJECT: BRONSON DRIVE AND COUNTY N
SURFACE WATER COUNTYYROAD 12EPHEN STREET BETWEEN
(TH 10)
letter
15areviewedStff has
homeownersalongtSt.he dStephen Street rainage ndated eFebruarysseina18, 1983f(am
copy is attached).
The area in question has no catchbasins or storm sewer in place in
the street. The street (see sketch of drainage area) drains to a
low point centered on the lot line between lots 12 and 13 (5315 and
5307 St. Stephen) Block 5, Pinewood Terrace No. 2. A 15 foot drainage
easement is centered on the lot line and extends 400 feet to the low
wetland lying westerly of the homes (see attached copy of a portion
of the plat map). A drainage swale was constructed from the street
to near the rear lot lines but does not appear to extend any further
west into the low area. The drainage swale does have a minimum slope
to the west (see attached sketch) to near the rear lot line. The
swale does show evidence of having silted in over the years. The
swale appears to function under normal runoff conditions. But during
hen the ground is frozen and snow is piled along
spring snow melt, w
the edge of the street, the drainage swale will not function and water
will accumulate in the street and adjacent driveways and front lawns.
City personnel have observed this section of street completely covered
with water.
A storm sewer constructed in1964 along the rear lot was not extended
to St. Stephen Street. The position of the manholes with solid lids
does not allow catchment of the surface waiver runoff (s__h sketch
locating existing 21 inch storm sewer).
Review indicates the following courses of action:
1) Do nothing.
2) Clean and regrade drainage swale to insure better drainage
to low land. If swale was regraded to sufficient width
then the City snow blower could clear a path during the
winter months. Estimated cost is $6,500.00.
3) Clean swale from street to near existing 21 inch storm sewer
and construct $1,000.00 to $2,000.00 catch basin.
4) Construct catch basins in St. Stephen and run a new storm
sewer pipe to existing 21 inch storm sewer. Estimated cost
is $7,500.00.
Staff requests the Council to give direction on request by residents to
resolve this concern.
Ru µ�
Mments
""j i 91Uii ,
OTY Of
t,
MOUNDS VIfW.i2�5307 St. Stephen Street
Hounds February g, MN55112 83
Administrative Office
2401 Highway 10
Mounds View, 101
Attn: City Council
Des' Council Members,
We, the homeowners on St. Stephen Strectl would like to call to the
attention of the Mounds View Council the drainage problem xe are having.
It seems that when our warmer weather and beautiful sun draws closer
to usp it causes a severe water problem in our street. There is no
drainage where it is evidently needed, The water floods our street and
has no where to go but in between the houses of 5307 and 53131 providing
there is no snow blocking its way.
® The city seems to feel that this is our (the homeowners) problem, and
we should have to fix it. This is where we disagree and feel it is the
cities responsibility to provide adequate sewer and drainage systems
The water is not coming from our property and going into the streetp
but quite the opposite*
likes to a aL.a th be L.... .taw ♦M L1.�
�8 liDU1u iKtl vv rcquoov uttav ovum vuang w uvtto wive vu j+ruvawn.....•
and soon.
Thank you for your consideration of this matter.
See page 2 for the signatures of the homowners concerned with this
problems
11
T-A
• Homewnera ooncerning Ste 8tephoul Drainage Problem page 2
-A. •, Ft
%l.�r11(�Clu!.. 4 70
;.
�r (�Q� �r )�L.�4.^n'i1/i 'S :JCIq �7T' .'); (�C)i,i�') %'f/ ���i� rc�tr) r'•'
nl��5 �..�2 c 11�c•�Uc 5-lzo sr 5rer'heas 756. ci711
%� � �l �•� /c-/� -I /����«�r,;��hJ r�:7.�� l/ /�,,G�1 '-. �/569
.."/r «�Ull r-7
/ r^
n
i��E►;se Nla� Alai (7415pws(�,
6501 S F )6 15A •
0
RIM ' 100.0 I
IE = 92.1 9
1115 MANHOLE LVATep 3
AFFROX. 5801 NORTH OF
WHeRE SHOWN
5325
V•
A�
D
D �
yO 3 5319
R'
m' 0 5315
O N O
_ W
C7AR
7yAAp D y3c.� Z
G Y X X X-
FEr�
ZmZ
N 5307
N �p
N
IE 91.1
THIS MANH01,p
DYED AppRox.13o'
50UN OF WHEIOr sH°MN
9
•
5320
5514
5508
9"Z
it"
AM
37
Low ftj Lam
I
MANHOLE
k
S a 33 A
/6 i M 6 kl�6y�
Low Wei Land
411
1
fi 3/ x
B _ 30
21
27
� Y
b
� ` \ imp ,��' by `' � �•�
etib y 2� � h
n
/3 All
2S b4 ia.
01 /4 � • ��` e \bb
24
e 9
MANHOLE
is 5 H /e
CO 23
zo
kv
Lxx jJ
_ Z Q f �o t
--ir-
14
It
i x5 Q 10 i
12
12
! fA
q B7�V7\.�QT�i� b.41411117 KI{taLl -- rf vta 1G • .._"
n
G 7'!.. a
22 I GG I !
ro GO .{I'37ISO
—
21• /� � 2 �3E20 2
0
3 35 3
4 L ` 34 i ` '
e 5 .
S� ]3 S
I
to
\ e '.32 a
ns 7 7e
01
aus O O 31 7
O w+
w
1 •. \� 30 5 f 8
fo.oel'e
•'I •flo l
ro l'
•7e
I
�fi9
ri
I I
I
I
lj 7
I
I
I I
I
I
JL
12
la
i 14
n
•
II
I
II
.. 1
I
60
f
29 . 9 N LAMBERT
'
ze to I ,k zxa�
II 'l to
27 ' g e 7
'lerz 28
I 13
`C 25 I
14 t� i9 13
h 24
15
i 6 23 14
20 g " iti 12 16 fl 14
22
%
° °ng ,+..1 U` �.P J?fAh 211 z u _ .17I to
t i4►}7r1F'_ _ _
9Y
_
`• I
q(clptS
MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Director of Public Works/Community Development �t/�
DATE: March 31, 1983 U
SUBJECT: MODIFCATIONS AND REPAIRS TO ATOMETER AT TREATMENT
PLANT NO. 1
Layne Minnesota Company has submitted a quotation to modify the
atometer at Treatment Plant No. 1. The modification will allow
City personnel to service the aeration equipment on an annual
basis as suggested by the equipment manufacturer. As you remember
from the tour of Treatment Plant No. 1 on Saturday, March 19, 1983,
the atometer is the device that injects air into the raw water to
oxidize the iron before flowing through the filters. if this unit
does not function properly then water treatment capability is
seriously impaired.
The price for the new atometer and compressed air regulator valves
is $2,888.00. Layne Minnesota estimates it will require two men,
one day to remove the old unit and install the new unit. The cost
S of the two man crew and their equipment is $73.00 per hour. Labor
is therefore estimated to cost approximately $584.00.
Staff is requesting Council authorization to purchase from Layne
Minnesota a new atometer unit including installation. Estimated
cost is $3,472.00. Actual cost will be dependent on actual time
required for installation.
ici/bc
• MEMO TO: City Council and Clerk -Administrator
FROM: Director of Public Works/Community Development
DATE•': March 30, 1983
SUBJECT: SIGN ORDINANCE - CHAPTER 39
The Planning Commission, at their March 2, 1983 meeting, recom-
mended revisions to Chapter 39 entitled, "Signs and Billboards".
The main emphasis of changes that are being recommended are as
they relate to temporary type signs. New definitions for banners
and portable signs are being recommended with this change in
addition to size and time limitations for the placement of these
types of signs.
Should the Council agree with the recommendations of the Planning
Commission, staff should be directed to draft an ordinance for
publication on April 14th with first reading of the ordinance and
public hearing on April 25th, second reading on May 9th, and publi-
cation on May 12th, with the ordinance being effective thirty days
after the date of publication.
If you have any questions concerning these revisions, please contact
me.
/be
11ROC8I1,DINGS OF Till, PLANNING COMMISSION
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
RAMSI.;Y COUNTY, MINNESOTA
• Regular Meeting
March 2, 1983
Mounds View City Hall
2,101 Iiwy. 10, Mounds View, MN 55112
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Mounds View Planning Commission was called to 1. Call to order
order by Chairman Mountin at 7:35 p.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Commissioners Anderson, Miller, 2. Roll Call
Vorslund, McCarthy and Chairman Mountin.
It was noted that Commissioner Quick had an excused
absence. Commissioner Warren arrived at 7:40 p.m.
ALSO PRESENT: Enginceriny/Planning Technician
Rampel.
It was noted that COUneilmember Blanchard was not
present.
Motion/Second: Miller/Anderson to approve the 3. Approval of
February 2, 1983 minutes. Minutes:
® February 2, 1983
ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
'There were no residents requests or comment:: from 4. Residents Request:
the floor. and Comments
From t1+C P1oor
Motion/Second: Forslund/Anderson to table indefi- 5. Ervin Herbst
nately the Herbst Enterprises Subdivision as requested 2299 County Road
in their letter dated February 21, 1983 to the City Major Subdivision
of Mounds View. Case 124-83
G ayes 0 nays
�There was considerable QiSCnSSiOn on recommended
;9lrevisions to Cliaptor. 39, Signs and Billboards.
Commissioner Forsiund left during this discussion
, at 9:30 p.m.
Motion/Second: Miller/Anderson to recommend to the
Counciil revisions to Chapter 39 and forward those
recommendations to the City Council. Chapter 39 is
attached to the minutes.
Motion Carried
G. Chapter 39 -
Signs and Bill-
boards Discussion
5 ayes 0 nays '.Motion Carried
39.01
CHAPTER 39
SIGNS AND BILLBOARDS
39.01 Definitions. The following terms have the meanings
ascribed to them in this section:
(1) "Banner" means an attention gettiny device, the materials
of whichhich consists of paper, cloth or of other manmade materials and
which are of temporary nature.
45}(2) "Billboard" means an advertising sign located off the
premises where the advertised product is sold or offered. It is
usually but not necessarily owned by an advertising company.
46}(3) "Business Occupant" means an individual or group of indi-
viduals owning, renting or leasing a building or part thereof to
conduct a business separate of others.
414 M "Business Sign" means a sign that states the proper name
of the business, organization or institution located on the premises
on which the sign is located.
49}(5) "Ground Sign" means a detached sign erected upon or
supported by the ground and not attached to any building.
4}3}(6) "Pedestal Sign" is a ground sign erected upon a single
post or shaft, or upon two posts or shafts that merge or touch at the
base, or which are not more than 15 feet apart, center of shaft to
center of shaft, with the display portion mounted on top thereof at
least seven (7) feet above the surface of the street adjacent to the
property on which the sign is .located. No such sign shall have a
sign area of more than 340 square feet on each side. Such sign may
advertise only businesses located on the premises. No business
property shall have more than one pedestal sign adjacent to each street
upon which such business property abuts; provided that on each street
frontage of more than 100 feet one additional frontage of such addi-
tional pedestal sign (a) is located on a single pole, (b) does not
exceed 28 square feet in area on any side and does not have more than
two sides, (c) is not more than four (4) feet in width or seven (7)
feet in height on the sign face, (d) is located at least seven (7)
feet above the surface of the street. In lieu of one additional
pedestal sign, two separate signs may be located on the same pole, but
such two signs combined shall not exceed, in area or dimensions, the
limitations applicable to a single additional pedestal sign. No
pedestal sign shall be so designed as to have both (a) moving parts,
and (b) moving or blinking lights. In addition to the pedestal signs
permitted by the foregoing provisions of this subdivision, a sign
advertising a public telephone may be located in the area ahead of
the building setback line on the structure in which such public tele-
phone is located.
39.01
(7) "Portable Sign" means a back Lo Lack, mobile advertising
device w is _rag _e mountedon wheels and use for. commercial as r
well as civic promotions.
410 (S) "Projecting Sign" means a sign other than a wall sign
suspendedfrom or supported by a buildiny or structure and projecting
out therefrom.
411W) "Roof Sign" means a sign erected upon or above the roof
or parapet wall of a building or structure.
4W 10) "Sign" means a display board, billboard, screen, structure,
projection or part thereof, used to announce, declare, demonstrate,
display or otherwise advertise and attract the attention of the public.
{2}(11) "Sign, Advertising" means a sign, the primary function of
which is to direct attention to a product, service or activity that
is sold or offered either elsewhere or upon the premises where such
sign is located, or to which it is affixed.
415}(12) "Sign Area" means that area of a sign within the marginal
lines of the surface, which bears the announcement, name, advertise -
mentor other message; or in the case of letter, figures or symbols
attached directly to any part of a building, the area which is
included in the smallest rectangle which can be made to circumscribe
each letter, figure or symbol displayed thereon.
44H13) "Sign, Direction" means a sign for the purpose of making
specific commercial, industrial, or public and semipublic locations
known and to assist in finding these locations on the property which
the sign is located.
{8}(14) "Sign, flashing" means any illuminated sign on which the
artificial light is not maintained stationary and/or constant in
intensity and color at all times when such sign in in use.
{4}(15) "Sign, Identification" means a sign, the primary function
of which is to identify a residential, commercial, industrial, or
public or semipublic use located upon the premises where such sign is
located, or to which such sign is affixed. Signs identifying commer-
cial uses may call attention to the product, service or activity that
is sold or offered upon the premises. Signs identifying industrial
uses may call attention to the product, goods or material which is
produced, processed, assembled or stored upon the premises.
{q}(16) "Sign, Illuminated" means any illuminated sign on which
the artificial light is maintained stationary and/or constant in
intensity and color at all times when such sign is in use.
(17) "Temporary Ground Sign" means a sign which-rests-epoe-the
ryreundT-which-is-ef-either--',-'-frewe-er-=41-eenstraetion-eenstrueted
of-metal-er-ether-neneeixbustilale-materials;-anti-ee-designed-es-te-be
readily-xRevabie7--Ne-sueh-sign-shall-eKeeed-l9-square-feet-in-area �.a:
en -each -eider so designed as to be movable from on location to
another and which is not permanently attached to the ground, a sign
structure or a uil ing.
39.01
42}(30) "Wall sign" muans a sign attached to or erected against
the wall of a building or structure with the exposed face of the
sign in a plane approximately parallel to the face of said wall.
39.02 Building Permits Required. It is unlawful to install,
construct, erect, alter, revise, reconstruct or relocated any outdoor
sign or strucLurL, as defined in 39.01, in the Municipality without
first obtaining a permit therefore as required by this chapter except
as provided in 39.03 of this chapter.
Exc 39.03 eptions. Permits need not be obtained (but the other
provisions of this section shall be observed) for the following types
of signs:
(1) A sign not exceeding ten (10) square feet in area, pertaining
only to the sale, rental or lease of the premises upon which displayed.
(2) A sign on residential property stating only the name of the
occupant, which sign shall not exceed two (2) square feet in area.
(3) A sign on property on which a public, charitable or religious
institution is located, stating the name and nature of the occupancy
and information as to the conditions of use or occupancy, or a sign
on such property used by the institution as a bulletin board, which
sign shall not exceed ten (10) square feet in area.
(4) A wall sign advertising the business located in the building
' upon which displayed, where such sign is erected by the owner or
proprieter of the business located therein.
(5) An electioneering sign as provided for in Chapter 39.-2'0 9.14
Subdivision 22 14, Electioneering Siqns. (254).
39.04 Licensing of Sign Installers. No person shall engage in
the business of ereeting installing signs, nor shall be entitled to
receive a permit to erect install a sign in connection with such
business unless he first is licensed by the Municipality to do so.
39.11 Application and Fee. A license may be granted by the
Council upon written application to the Clerk -Administrator in such
form as required by the Clerk -Administrator and accompanied by an
annual license fee as established by _esolution of the City Council.
39.06 Revocation and Renewal. A license may be terminated and
renewal thereof may be denied by the Council for cause after notice
to the licensee and reasonable opportunity for the licensee to be
heard on the question of such termination. Cause shall include any
repeated or persistent violation of the requirements of this chapter.
39.07 Insurance. Any person, firm or corporation holding a
license sha 1 ile with the Clerk policies of public liability and
property damage insurance which shall remain and be in force and
' effect during the entire term of said license and which shall contain
a provision that they shall not be cancelled without ten (10) days
written notice to the municipality. Public liability insurance should
noL be less than ffH-,4 9.-H $250,000 for injuries, including acci-
39.07 '
dental death to any one person, and subject to the same limit for
each person, in an amount not less than $p09;099-98 $500,000.00 on
account of any one accident, and property insurance in the amount
of not less than $50,000.00.
39.08 Duration of License. Licenses shall be issued on an
annual basis, with the license year running from July 1 through the
following June 30th.
39.09 Application for Permits. Application for permits shall
be made upon forms provided by the Clerk -Administrator and shall
include the following information:
(1) The name, address and telephone number of the applicant.
(2) The location of the building, structure or lot to which, or
upon which, the sign is to be placed.
(3) The position of the sign or other advertising structure in
relation to nearby buildings, structurc5and streets or highways if
necessary.
(4) Two blueprints or ink drawings of the plans and specifications
and method of construction and attachment to the building or ground.
(5) A copy of the stress sheets and calculations may be required
by the inspector, on larger signs, showing that the structure is '
designed for dead load and wind pressure in any direction in the
amount required by this part and any other applicable law.
(6) The name of the person, firm, corporation, or ther organiza-
tion erecting the structure, if not the applicant; or the name of
the person, firm, corporation or other organization on whose property
the structure is to be located, if not the applicant.
(7) The written consent of the owner of the property, if not the
applicant.
(8) A statement as to whether the sign will be illuminated or not.
(9) A statement as to whether any electric lights on the sign
will be "moving" or blinking.
(10) A statement as to whether the sign will be single -faced,
double-faced or multi -faced.
(11) A statement as to whether or not the copy on the sign will be
changeable.
(12) A statement as to whether or not the copy on the sign will
relate only to the business or activity conducted on the premises on
which the sign is to be located.
39.10 Permit Fees. The application for a permit shall be
accompanied by the required permit fee. as-mei-e- fully- set-eat-4n
39.10
Ghaptes-69-e€-this-Eede---The-€ees-ptevided-thereifl-aEe-in-addition
o to-afly-a}ear=riea}-at�d-ha}}ding-pe�tni!-€ees-segai�ed-dp-this-Fade:
The permit fee shall be established by resolution of the City Council.
39.11 Waiver of Pees. The Council may in its direction waive
the fee required by this part where the signs are to be erected by
civic or religious organization.
39.12 Maintenance of Premises. Premises on which ground signs
are located shall be maintained free of weeds and debris, and where
landscaping was part of the original sign permit, such landscaping
shall be maintained in the manner provided in such permit. (214)
39.13 Traffic Regulation and Sign Location. Compliance with the
following regulations relative to traffic control is required:
(1) No moving or flashing sign shall be located or maintained
within 50 feet of an intersection at which traffic semaphores are
located.
(2) No sign shall be designed, located or maintained so as to be
likely to obscure or conceal or cause confusion as to any traffic
control sign or device.
(3) No sign shall be located or maintained on or over any public
street or highway right-of-way unless specifically permitted by the
zoning regulations of the Municipality.
(4) There shall be no use of revolving beacons, zip flashers,
flashing signs or similar devices that would distract automobile traf-
fic as to constitute a safety hazard. The illumination of any sign
located near a residential district shall be diffused or indirect and
located so as not to direct light on residences. No flashing sign
shall be located in such close proximity to residences or residential
property'as to constitute a nuisance to person residing on the property
be reason of flashing of the lights in such sign.
(5) The sign shall be located or maintained so as not to inter-
fere with the ability of drivers or pedestrians to see any crossroad
or crosswalk.
39.14 Construction Design Location and Maintenance of Signs.
Subdivision I. All Signs Construction Design, Location and
Maintenance. Every sign shall conform to the standards of this part
whether or not a permit therefor is required, and nothing contained '
herein shall be construed as modifying or repealing any of the
provisions of this Code relating to zoning. No sign shall be so
located as to obscure or tend to obscure any existing sign. The
following additional requirements are to be observed:
• (1) Each ground sign shall be securely built, constructed and
erected on the ground. Temporary ground signs shall be so designed
that they are not readily overturned.
39.14
(2) No sign structure shall be attached or placed upon any
building in such a manner as to obstruct any fire escape, or any
window or door, nor shall any sign structure be attached to a fire
escape.
(3) No sign erected before the passage of this part shall be
rebuilt, altered, or removed to a new location without being brought
into compliance with the requirements of this part.
(4) No swinging sign shall hereafter be erected or hung on or
attached to any building within the Municipality, and every such
sign so erected, hung, or attached prior to the passage of this
part which is deemed unsafe by the Building Inspector shall be
immediately removed by the owner thereof; or change to conform with
the requirements of this part when so ordered by the Building Inspector.
(5) Where portions of a sign are subject to different classifica-
tion, each portion shall meet the requirements of its classification.
(6) Each sign requiring a permit shall have an identifying number
to be provided by the Inspector, which number shall be posted on the
exterior surface of the sign structure in a location where such
information will be readily visible after the sign is constructed.
(7) All signs and sign structures shall be maintained in a safe
condition and in a state of good repair at all times. No sign shall
d obscene by a court of competent
display matter that has been deeme
jurisdictions.
(8) Each sign shall be used and maintained only in the manner
permitted and subject to the conditions imposed at the time the
permit therefor was granted.
Subdivision 2. Additional Conditions. The following additional
a.
conditions shall be observe
(1) No ground sign (except temporary e,-ee.=.a-signs, portable signs
or banners), signboard or billboard shall approach at any point
nearer than three (3) feet to any building unless such sign is
placed parallel to the side of the building; nor shall any such sign
be placed within sir. (G) feet of the side of any lot, nor nearer than
fifteen (15) feet to any street line where there is no established or
customary building line, nor within twenty-five (25) feet of any
street corner right-of-way. Whenever the established or customary
uniform building line upon the street where such ground sign is to be
erected is more than fifteen (15) feet from the street or property
line, then such sign shall not approach nearer the street than the
established or customary uniform building line.
(2) The owner, lessee, or occupanL of the land on which the
ground sign is located, and the owner of the sign, shall keep the
property on which the sign is located tree of long grass, weeds or
other rank growth, rubbish or debris.
(3) All parts of ground signs, elhe�-tkafl-ewreary-gsednd
9ign97 shall be designed for wind pressure of not less than thirty
39.14
(30) pounds per square root, and ground signs of wood construction
• shall have all members which extend into the ground protected from
decay by treatment with a preservative approved by the ehie€ Building
Inspector.
(4) No permit shall be granted for the location of any ground
sign having a sign area of more than forty (40) square feet, within
one hundred (100) feet of any single family residence; provided
that the Council may grant a special permit herefor if the owner of
such residence gives his written consent thereto.
(5) Pedestal signs permitted by the zoning regulations of the
Municipality and by this chapter may be located adjacent to the
right-of-way of a street or highway, but no part thereof shall extend
over such right-of-way.
(6) No sign shall exceed thirty-five (35) feet in height.
Subdivision 3. Clearance of Si Hs
from Conductors. The minimum
clearance of any sign from unprotected electrical conductors
(whether poles or other installations) shall not be less than thirty-
six (36) inches for conductors carrying not over 600 volts, and
forty-eight (48) inches for conductors carrying more than 600 volts.
Subdivision 4. Signs Along Freeways. Except as otherwise
provided in this chapter signs located on property adjacent to any
• freeway within the Municipality (including Interstate Highway 35W)
shall be business signs advertising businesses being conducted on
the premises on which the signs are located. No "traveling" or
changing -message signs shall be located so as to face any freeway or
be visible from the freeway. The provisions of this subdivision,
however, shall not be construed to render illegal or non -conforming
any signs which are legally located along any such freeway at the
time of adoption of this provision.; any billboard legally located
along any such freeway at the time of adoption of this provision may
be replaced, subject to compliance with the other provisions of this
part, either in the same location or at another location along any
such freeway provided that such alternate location is first approved
by the Council.
Subdivision 5. Projection Signs; Construction and Design. The
following standards shad Be maintained for all projection signs:
(1) All portions of projection signs shall be designed for a
wind pressure of not less than thirty (30) pounds per square foot.
(2) Such signs shall not project over public street right-of-way,
but may project over sidewalks located on private walks. No such
sign shall be less than twelve (12) feet above the level of: the side-
walk; provided that such signs which do not exceed four (4) square
feet, and which do not project more than two (2) feet over the side-
walk may be eight (8) or more feet above the sidewalk. No projection
sign shall project beyond a curb line nor more than eight (8) feet
over any private sidewalk.
39.14
(3) There shall he no more than two (2) feet• of space between
the inner edge of any such sign and the face of the wall from which
its projects, nor shall the outer edge of the sign be more than
eight (8) feet from the face of the wall.
(4) The building or structure from which any such sign projects
and all attachments or fastenings must be so constructed as to
safely resist the dead load and the wind load added by the attached
sign.
(5) All such signs shall be of non-combustible materials or of
not less than one hour fire resistive construction.
Subdivision 6. Roof Signs; Construction and Design. The
following standards shall be maintained for all roof signs:
(1) No roof sign shall be located nearer than five (5) feet from
the outside wall toward which it faces, nor exceed twenty-five (25)
feet in height above the roof level of the building unless constructed
integral with the building or structure, nor shall it project beyond
the edge of said roof in any direction. For the purposes of this
subdivision, lights attached to the sign structure and lights attached
to the building and beamed toward the sign structure shall be con-
sidered part of the sign structure.
(2) Every such sign shall be either ;etal, metal clad, incombus-
tible, open wire or open metal clad, except that such sign may have
letters, figures, characters, or borders of wood if such borders do
not exceed four (4) inches in width, and such wooden letters, figures
or characters do not cover more than twenty-five (25) percent of the
area of such sign, provided that in place of sheet metal, substitution
may be made of the following materials; tempered pressed wood or
other similar materials approved by.the Building Inspector, having
equal properties as to strength, fire and moisture resistance.
(3) No such sign shall be so placed as to prevent free passage
of persons from one part of the roof to another.
(4) The building or structure upon which such such sign is placed,
and all attachments or fastenings must be so constructed as to
safely resist the dead load and the wind load added by the attached
sign, and in such a manner as not to cause damage to the building or
structure on which such sign is placed.
(5) No roof sign shall be more than sixty-five (65) feet in
length nor shall it extend more than twenty-five (25) feet above the
surface of the roof of the building on which it is located. No roof
sign shall extend more than forty-five (45) feet above the average
ground level of that part of the street toward which it faces.
Subdivision 7. Wall signs; Construction and Design. The
following standards shall be maintained for all wall signs-
(1) No wall sign shall have a projection over a private sidewalk
or an established building line of more than twelve (12) inches.
39.14
(2) The materials, construction and attachment of any such
Ssign shall meet the Same standards and requirements as roof signs.
Subdivision B. Banners-and-Tempefafy-6igns. Banners, Temporary
or Portable Signs. The following standards shall be maintained for
all banners and tempefafy-s#tins, temporary or portable signs:
(1) Temporary signs and banners attached to any building and
constructed of canvas, plastic material, cloth or other eembestible
material with or without framework, shall be strongly constructed
and shall be securely attached to their supports. They shall be
removed (including all framework and supports) as soon as damaged or
torn and in no case later than 6; 21 days after erection.
(2) Banner and temporary signs a€-eembestible-materials shall
not be larger than 120 square feet in area for each 20 feet of building
frontage. There shall not be more than one temporary sign on any
building frontage.
(3) No banner or temporary sign of-esmbestible-eenstfeetien shall
project over public property or right-of-way, but may extend a maxi-
mum of six (6) inches from the face of the building.
(4) Banners and temporary signs a€-eembestible-eenstfeetien shall
not be hung so as to cover either partially or completely any door,
window, or opening required for ventilation.
• (5) No fee€-sign-a€-eembestible-ixateflal-and-ne-tex+pesasy-gsewnd
sign temporary gseuRd sign, kempesasy-saga-a€-sembusk ble-matesaal
banner or portable sign shall be located on any multiple -residence,
commercial or in ustrial property in the City without first obtaining
a speeial permit therefor from the Eeuneil Cam. If the 6eeneil CC�it�yy
determines to grant an application for a spearal permit for any su-cr-i
temporary sign af-bannefing;-ef-any-seeH-testpefafy-gfeend-sign, banner
or portable sign, it may impose conditions upon the granting thereof,
and it shall be unlawful to locate or maintain any such sign or ban-
nering for a longer period or in a different manner than that specified
in the speeial permit. Ne-swab-&peeia)•-permit-ahalk-be -a€-x+efe-than
sixty-466}-daysT No such speeial permit shall be granted, however,
where such temporary signs et:-hannefs, banners or portable signs are
prohibited by other provisions of the Code.
(6) No portable sign or temporary ground sign shall exceed 32
square feet on each side.
(7) No portable sign temporary sign, or banner shall be located
on any property in the City for more than 21 days at one time or for
morn than three 21-dav periods in anv one vear.
Subdivision 9. Truck Signs. The following standards shall be
maintained for truck signs:
(1) All signs posted upon any truck, semi -trailer body, or other
mobile device shall be subject to the regulations of this chapter
and section.
39. 14
Subdivision 10. Application of other Provisions of this Section.
Temporary gfeasd signs as defined in 39.01 49H 11), shall comply
with the provisions of Subdivision E herein.
Subdivision 11. Approval of. Sign Permit Applications. Upon
presentation of application, permit Fee, plans and specifications
and other required information, the sign construction permit shall
be issued by the Clcrk-Administrator, except as provided in Subdi-
vision 12 of this chapter.
Subdivision 12. _tLciai Approval from Council. In the case of
an application for a sign reyuiring a special permit, or which will
be illuminated, or moving, or of unusual height, size, design, or
location, the Clerk -Administrator shall refer such sign to the Council
for approval. No permit for any such sign, so referred, shall be
issued without first obtaining the approval of the Council.
Subdivision 13. Future Permits. A permit shall not be issued
for any new billboard or advertising sign located off the premises
where the advertised product is sold, if such billboard or sign would
be within three hundred (300) feet of any other such billboard or
sign already in existence. Any billboard destroyed by an act of God
may be rebuilt within thirty (30) days, if the construction of same
would comply with this subdivision.
Subdivision 14. Electioneering Signs. The following regulations
shall apply to all campaign signs for political candidates or issues:
(1) No more than one electioneering sign shall be erected per
candidate or issued along each street frontage of any parcel of land.
(2) Electioneering signs shall not exceed twelve (12) square feet
and not exceed four (4) feet in height above the ground except, where
such signs are located no closer than one hundred fifty (150) feet to
the property line of a residential dwelling, the maximum size shall
be thirty-two (32) square feet and the maximum height above the
ground shall be six (6) feet.
(3) Electioneering signs may be displayed from the last day of
candidacy filing or thirty (30) days before an election, whichever
is earlier.
(4) All electioneering signs must be removed no later than five
(5) days after an election except that after a primary election signs
for the winning primary candidates need not be removed until after
the ensuing general election. (254)
Subdivision 15. Signs Allowed by District. The following
requirements are for allowable signs as they pertain to zoned
districts:
(1) R-1 Single Family Residential District.
(a) A sign on residential property stating only the name
or address of the occupant not exceeding two (2)
square feet in size.
39.15
(b) A sign not exceeding ten (10) square feet in area
' pertaining only to the sale, rental or leasing of
the premises upon which displayed.
(c) A sign, as allowed in Chapter 40.10, Subdivision
C(3), pertaining to home occupations.
(d) Signs as allowed in Subdivision 14.
(2) R-2 Singlc and Two Family Residential District.
(a) Signs as allowed in Subdivision 15(1).
(3) R-3 Medium Density Residential District.
(a) Signs as allowed in Subdivision 15(1).
(4) R-4 High Density Residential District.
(a) Signs as allowed in Subdivision 15(1).
(b) Direction signs for office, model, apartments,
etc., locations not exceeding five (5) square feet.
(5) R-0 Residential Office District.
1..
(a) Signs as allowed in Subdivision 15(4).
(6) B-1 Neighborhood Business District.
(a) Signs not exceeding one hundred (100) square feet
total areas combined. This includes all types of
permanent signs as defined in 39.01.
(b) Temporary signs as allowed by-Eity-Geeneii in 39.14,
Subdivision 8(5).
(7) B-2 Limited Business District.
(a) Signs not exceeding one hundred (100) square feet
per business occupant. This includes all types of
permanent signs as defined in 39.01.
(b) Temporary signs as allowed bp-the-eity-Eeaneil: in
39.14, Subdivision 8(5).
(8) B-3 Highway Business District.
(a) Signs as allowed in Subdivision 15(7).
(9) B-4 Regional Business District.
' (a) Signs as allowed in Subdivision 15(7).
(10) I-1 Light Industrial District.
(a) Signs as allowed in Subdivision 15(7).
Y
39.14
(11) I-2 Heavy Industrial District.
(a) Signs as allowed in Subdivision 15(7). 1
(12) B-3 Highway Business District, B-4 Regional Business
District, I-1 Light Industrial District, and I-2 Heavy Industrial
District may have besides the one hundred (100) square feet signage
per business occupant one general pedestal sign not exceeding three
hundred forty (340) square feet. Only one pedestal sign is allowed
per property.
Subdivision 16. Standard; Requirement. Where the conditions
imposed by any provisions of this Code are either more or less
restrictive than comparable conditions imposed by any other code,
rule or regulation of the City, the code, rule or regulation which
imposes the more restrictive condition, standard, or requirement shall
prevail.
39.15 Penalties. Any person, firm or corporation found violating
any of the provisions of the chapter shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.
.J
j
MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Clerk -Administrator
DATE: March 30, 1983
SUBJECT: SMITH TERMINALS CORPORATION TAX ABATEMENT
As you will recall, Smith Terminals Corporation appealed the
assessed valuation of their property in the Mounds View Industrial
Park for 1980, 1981, and 1982 to Ramsey County. This office
received a notification from the State of Minnesota indicating
that Ramsey County had reviewed the valuation of the properties
and agreed that a reduction was necessary. After discussing it
with you during the January 17, 1983 Agenda Session, staff contacted
the Department of Revenue indicating that the City wished to arrange
a meeting with representatives of the Department of Revenue and
Ramsey County to review the information relating to abatement of
taxes on the property in question and the acceptability of their
conclusions.
On March 28, 1983 Finance Director Brager and I met with Ms. Lucy
Mitchell, of the Minnesota Department of Revenue, as well as
Mr. John Lewen and Mr. Mark Genther, of Ramsey County Department
of Property Taxation, to review the information contained in their
files regarding this matter and the methods followed to determine
the appropriateness of an abatement of taxes on Smith Terminals'
property in Mounds View. The following information was gleaned
from this meeting:
1. on August 16, 1982 the International Appraisal Company, on
behalf of Smith Terminals Corporation, submitted a letter
to the Ramsey County Department of Property Taxation appealing
the assessed valuations of their property on Mustang Road for
years 1980, 1981, and 1982.
2. In response to this appeal, Mr. Mark Genther of the Ramsey
County Department of Property Taxation reviewed the property
in question on November 12, 1982 and recommended that
reductions in the .assessed valuations hr made. These
reductions were made on the basis that the trucking industry,
on a nation-wide basis, is in an extremely depressed state and
that the property owned by trucking companies is both poorly
maintained due to their financial constraints and highly
restricted as to its marketability for purchase by other
industrial users. It has been the past practice of Ramsey
County to reduce assessed valuations for trucking terminals
and the County is at this time undertaking a County -wide
abatement of all future assessed valuations for these types
of properties.
1.
-2-
The recommended abatement was to eliminate the 10% increase
in property valuos for 1980 and 1981 that were applied by
the Ramsey County Department of Property Taxation on a
County -wide basis and to modify thu 1982 assessed valuation
using a cost approach to the valuation.
3. The appraisal reports are then submitted
to t tile Abatemeopertynaxation
nt
Department of the Ramsey County Department o
which reviews the reasonableness of the abatements and
establishes new tax levels for the properties in question.
4. If the abatement is greater than $50,000 over a three year
period, the abatement is referred to the Minnesota Department
of Revenue to follow the requirements of Minnesota Statutes
which270.19 provides a
the abatementthr ugh anappealsnunits challenge
processestablishedby the
Statutes.
After thoroughly reviewing the information supplied to us and
considering the statements made during our meeting, Finance
Director Brager and I agree that the level of abatement was
reasonable based on the considerations stated during the meeting
and cited in an earlier portion of this memo, and that it would
not be advisable for the City of Mounds View to challenge the
abatement as there appear to be no reasonable grounds for such a
challenge. Based on initial estimates of the impaci-of the
abatement, it would appear that the City aL �•un would
experience a reduction in tax payments in an amount not to exceed
$600.00 resulting from this abatement.
Should Council agree with staff recommendation not to carry our
challenge on this abatement any further, it will be necessary that
Council authorize staff to send a letter to the State Department
of Revenue withdrawing our earlier objections.
DFP/pf.
4
fO: Mayor & Council
FROM: Finance Director -Treasurer erager
DATE: March 31, 1983
RE: HEALTH INSURANCE
I recently received notice from Prudential Insurance Company
of their intent not to renew our group health and life insurance
policy when it expires, April 30, 1983. Nationwide,Prudential is
taking this action with small groups. This affects two employees
in the Police Department that have health insurance coverage ( all
other City employees are members of Group Health Plan) and all City
employees for life insurance.
I have contacted approximately six insurance agents and have
been informed that they do not know of any insurance company that
will provide group health insurance coverage for two employees. The
only plan that I have been able to find for these two employees is
the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust Program (LMCIT). The
plan would offer health insurance and life insurance for the two
employees presently covered under the Prudential policy. It would
not, however, provide life insurance coverage for those employees
under the Group Health Plan. At the present time, I am in the process
of obtaining quotations for group life insurance and will present
those at your next meeting. 1 am requesting the Council at the next
regular meeting, pass a resolution authorizing the Mayor & Clerk -
Administrator to enter into an agreement with the LMCIT to provide
eroun I,ealrh and life insurance benefits for City employees. A copy
of an explanation of the plan is attached.
DD/ds
Attachment
4
rI
C
__� league of minnesota cities
LMCIT/WASUINGTON NATIONAL HEALTH INSURANCE PLAN
The League of Minnesota Cities insurance Trust (LMCIT) Board has approved 1983
renewal premium rates for the health insurance plan offered by LMCIT in cooperation
with Washington National. Cities will also now have an option to choose higher
deductibles, as well as an option for an increased amount of life insurance.
BENEFITS
Medical
dividual pays a $100 calendar year e�dutble.
Under the basic plan each insured in
No more than three deductibles will be charged against any one family p year.
The city can also choose a $250 or $500 deductible, at reduced cost. After
the deductible is satisfied, the plan pays 80% of the individual's covered medical
costs; the individual pays the remaining 20%. After the individual has paid a
total of $500 over and above the deductible, the plan pays 100% up to a lifetime
limit of $1,000,000. The plan includes all benefits required by statute, including
maternity, chemical dependency, etc.
Life Insurance
The basic plan includes $5000 term life insurance on each employee. The amount
of life insurance may be increased to $10,000 for any an additionaelyloyedl charge.empThe up
scheduled amount of life insurance applies
to age 70. After age 70, the life insurance reduces to 25% of the scheduled amount.
Disability Income Insurance
coveragerpays s6612/3% ofcthe employee'sssalary aupetosaamaximum ofseither on. The
coverae
$100
or $200 at the city is option. Benefits commence on the first day of disability
cause) by accident and on tile eight day of disability caused by illness. Benefits
are payable for a maximum of 26 weeks for any one period of disability. Note:
if the city chooses to offer disability income coverage, all l employee
employees
must be enrolled; the coverage is not optional on an individual employee basis.
-over-
RC, 1-,ni J, mini ' i 11 i 1 01 (61 2) r P7.5600
RATES
The following month, rates are effective January 1, 1982 through June 30, 1983.
Basic�lan including b5000 term life insurance
Deductible
Single rate
Family rate
$100
57.71
$150.84
250
51.64
134.39
500
48.39
125.55
Additional $5000 term life insurance - $3.55
Short-term disability income insurance - b100/week - $8.00
$200/week - $16.00
ELIGIBILITY
Any city having two or more eligible full-time (30 or more hours per week)
employees is eligible to participate. Cities having 10 or fewer eligible
employees must enroll 1001. of the eligible employees. Cities having more than
10 eligible employees must enroll at least 75% of the eligible employees. An
employee who is a member of an HMO offered as an option by the employer or who
is covered as a dependent under a spouse's coverage may be excluded from the
count of "eligible employees" in determining whether these percentage requirements
are met.
Cities having 100 or more employees are eligible to participate in this plan.
However, such cities will be rated separately, depending on their own experience
and census data.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
For additional information on benefits, eligibility, rates, or enrollment, contact
either of these offices:
League of Minnesota Cities Washington National Insurance Co.
183 University Avenue East Suite 472 - 6600 France Ave. South
St. Paul, MN 55101 Minneaplis, MN 55435
612/227-5600 612/920-2716
Yh1'W /6
MEMO T0: Mounds View City Council
FROM: Bruce K. Anderson, Direc or
Parks, Recreation and Fo t
DATE: March 31, 1983
RE: New Brighton/Mounds View Tree and Stump Removal
Contract
Enclosed is a memo from City Forester Rick Wriskey which out-
lines the bids for the 1983 New Brighton/Mounds View tree and
stump removal contract. As you aware, we have entered into a
joint powers agreement with the City of New Brighton for
forestry services and we extended the contract in 1982 to
include a joint tree and stump removal contract.
Bid specs were prepared and opened in the City of New Brighton
on February 24 with five firms bidding on the 1983 contract.
Staff has included a list of the five tree firms and a
tabulation of the firms bids based on the 1982 tree removal
list.
Staff would recommend that we award the 1983 tree contract to
the low bid of Bluemel's Tree Service and that the City Council
place this item on the consent agenda for approval at the
April 11, 1983 meeting.
Should you have any questions regarding the tree and stump
removal contract, staff will be on hand Monday evening to
discuss the issue at greater length.
BKA/sll
Enclosure
t
MEMO TO: Bruce Anderson, Director
Parks, Recreation and Forestry
FROM: Rick Wriskey, Cit Pr
ster
DATE: March 30, 1983
RE: Award of 1983 Tree and Stump Removal Contract
Bids for the 1983 New Brighton/Mounds View tree and stump removal
contract were opened at New Brighton City Hall at 11:00 a.m.,
February 24, 1983. Five (5) tree removal firms submitted bids.
Bluemel's Tree Service was the low tabulated bidder. The
following list shows the bidding firms and their total tabulated
bids:
Bluemels's Tree Service
$46,911.70
Co. Trunk A
Rt. 1 - Box 215
Hudson, Wisconsin 54016
Arp's Tree Service
$48,077.35
17845 Ward Lake Drive
Cedar, Minnesota 55011
Midwest Tree Removal
$52,425.95
540 Greenhaven Road
Anoka, Minnesota 55303
Langer's Tree Service
$61,454.55
1743 Florence St.
White Bear Lake, Mn. 55110
Precision Tree
$78,110.00
W 256-54920 Oakdale Rd.
Waukesha, Wisconsin 53186
Bluemel's held New Brighton's 1981 tree removal contract and did
satisfactory work.
On Tuesday, March 22, the New Brighton City Council approved the
recommendation to award the 1983 New Brighton/Mounds View tree
and stump removal contract to Bluemel's Tree Service.
RW/sl
MEMO TO: Mounds View City Counc'1
FROM: Bruce K. Anderson,
Parks, Recreation a d s ry
DATE: March 31, 1983
RE: Hiring of half-time aquatics director
Enclosed you will find a memorandum that was distributed to the
Parks and Recreation Commission at their March 24, 1983 meeting
which outlines the feasibility of hiring a half-time aquatics
director. The aquatics director would be responsible for the
organization, direction, implementation and coordination of the
City's aquatics program at both the Edgewood Pool and the Lake-
side Park Beach. As indicated in the staff memo, the aquatics
program currently coordinated by the City of Mounds View involves
33 seasonal employees with expenditures of approximately $32,000
and revenue in the area of $10,000.
Staff's proposal as outlined would recommend the hiring of
"a regular part-time employee which is defined in the Mounds View
City Code, Chapter 6, under personnel 6.024 as an employee who
has successfully completed the probationary period and is employed
on a schedule of more than 20 hours and less than 40 hours per
week". Staff further proposes that this position would be funded
out of existing revenues. To be more specific, a joint powers
agreement would be implemented with the School District which
would include $1,500 - $2,000 of financial assistance and the
existing $3,500 from Lakeside Park and the additional $1,900
currently paid for a pool coordinator at Edgewood.
As noted in the staff memorandum, staff has completed preliminary
groundwork which indicates that we would be able to hire an ex-
tremely competent individual on a regular part-time basis at the
proposed salary range of $6,000 - $7,000 per year. It should be
noted that staff included fringe benefits in the $6,000 - $7,000
range so actually, the salary would probably be approximately
$5,000 - $6,000 with the remaining $1,000 - $1,500 to be paid
out in fringe benefits. It should be noted that fringe benefits
would be paid on a proportional basis as to the number of hours
that are actually worked, similar to the regular part-time police
secretary's position.
Both myself and Program Supervisor Mary Saarion will be on hand
Monday evening to discuss the feasibility of hiring a regular
part-time aquatics coordinator at Monday evenings meeting.
Should you have any questions regarding this issue prior to
Monday evenings meeting, feel free to contact myself directly
at ext. #41.
BKA/sll
Attachment
4
MEMO TO: Parks and Recreation Commission
rRomi Bruce K. Anderson, Director
40 Parks, Recreation and Forestry
DATE: March 22, 1983
RE: Review of Swimming Personnel
As you are aware, the Mounds View Parks and Recreation Department
currently is responsible for the operation of both the Edgewood
Community Center pool, as well as the outdoor beach at Lakeside
Park on Spring Lake during the summer months. Staff has prepared
a report which outlines the 1982 operation of the Parks and
Recreation Deparmtent Aquatics Program, including both Lakeside
Park Beach and the Edgewood Community Center pool. As can be
noted, the program has become quite extensive with 26 part-time
personnel employed at the Edgewood Community Center pool and
an additional seven full time/seasonal employees at Lakeside Park.
Expenditures for the two facilities is currently over $32,000,
with revenue approximately $10,000 from the two facilities.
Up until September of this year, we have been able to maintain
our aquatics program in-house thorygh-our current staff, with
the Program Supervisor coordinating both operations as one aspect
of her position. With the advent of the Edgewood Community Center
pool becoming a responsibility of our Department on a full time
basis in September, 1982, we have found that the aquatics program
is continuing to demand increased time from both the Program
Supervisor, School District staff, as well as the Parks and Recrea-
tion Director.
Staff has met with the School District Community Education staff
during the past two weeks to discuss the feasibility of hiring a
half-time aquatics coordinator which would be responsible to the
Parks and Recreation Department. Currently the School District
provides overall coordination of the aquatics program on a
School District -wide basis, with each individual Parks and Rec-
reation Department responsible for the day-to-day operations of
the pool.
The School District has tentatively indicated that they support
tho concept and would be willing to contribute $1,500 - $2,000
towards the salary of a part-time aquatics coordinator.
Staff feels that. with the financial support from the School
District of $1,500 - $2,000 and the current budgeted amount of $3,500
for Water Front Director at Lakeside Park, as well as the additional
$1,900 currently paid for the Pool Coordinator at Edgewood, we would
have approximately $6,500 - $7,000 in supervisory salaries which
could be assessed towards the hiring of a half-time aquatics
coordinator.
_ 2 _
?:I1
Staff has developed a job description which is attached for your
review which would outline the specific responsibilities the
Aquatics Coordinator would have. In addition to assuming the
responsibilities outlined in the enclosed job description, staff
feels that it would provide three additional functions to our
Department:
1. With the hiring of an Aquatics Coordinator we would be able
to expand our program offerings which would not only benefit
residents from a programmatic standpoint, but also would
increase revenues at the pool facility.
2. It would provide us the opportunity to coordinate our
Aquatics Program under one supervisor which would give us
better continuity between the pool and beach facilities from
both a stalling and programming standpoint.
3. The major impact would be on our existing staff as it would
free a great deal of staff time to become involved in other
areas, such as, the potential development of Park Planning Councils.
Staff feels LhaL by consolidating Lhe three part-time Aquatics
Supervisors positions and with the cooperation of the School District
we would be able to hire a half time Aquatics Director at a lower
rate Lhan we are currently paying while increasing services from
a nine month seasonal position to a 3.2 month Coordinator. As we
arc currently i❑ Lhe process of interviewing and hiring a Water
Front Director for the Lakeside Park Beach Program, staff would
like to raise the issue before both the Park Commission and City
Council at this time so that the position could be implemented for
the 1983 Beach Program should it appear feasible. Staff will be
available with additional support data or questions at Thursday's
Park Commission meeting.
BKA/pf
1'O,i!'1'!ON ACCOUNT_AIILI,11'Y WRITE-UP
POSITION TITLE: Acquatics Director - half Lime position
DRPARTMENT: Parks, Recreation and Forestry
® ACCOUNTABLE TO: Program Supervisor
PRIMARY OBJE.CTIVR OF POSITION: Is to organize, direct, implement,
and coordinate the CiLy's acquatics program at both the Edgewood
Community Center pool and Lakeside Park beach.
MAJOR AREAS OF ACCOUNTABILITY
1. Responsible for the supervision, hiring, and evaluation of
all beach and pool personnel including lifeguards, water
safety instructors, maintenance personnel and related
acquatics supervisors.
2. Responsible for scheduling the working hours, rotation and
staffing needs of the lifeguards at both the pool and
swimming beach area.
3. Assign work duties to assure that they are taken care of in
an efficient and smooth manner to include lifeguarding,
first aid, c1j'nnin'I and other maintenance as directed.
4. Responsible for preparation of all Lime sheets, Red Cross
certification cards and other written material as requested
• by the Program Supervisor.
5. Responsible for the in-house training and supervision of
all lifeguards in the areas of regulations, rules, safety
procedures, use of the equipment and techniques of general
beach and pool conLrol.
G. Responsible for working and coordinating with all related
agencies involved with the pool and beach program to include
but not limited to other municipal recreation departments,
Mounds View swimming association and local community, civic
organizations.
7. Directs and coordinates the preparation of the year round
swimming program which will be mailed to all school district
residents promoting swimming opportunities available through-
out the city.
B. oversees a variety of public relations activities designed to
make the most effective use available promotional possibilities
through local media, flyers, school announcements, letter
correspondence, (,,Lc. and follows through to evaluate, to the
extent• possible,uxcess of such endeavors.
s�
m
- 2 -
9. Establishes necessary policies and procedures required to
ensure all necessary paperwork is maintained for the proper
and efficient running of the acquatics program. Prepares a
variety of well documented reports that clearly identify
existing program activity and extent of participation. The
reports should include supporting information identifying
accountability for administration for each program and
related employee lists, budget allocations, etc.
10. Coordinates and controls facility usage for the Edgewood
Community Center pool and Lakeside Park beach to include
pool rentals and other special pool activities.
11. Initiates and controls all supply/equipment purchases to
replenish existing inventories and provide additional
items necessary for effective program implementation and
ensure that they are in good working condition.
12. Assumes other responsibilities as apparent or designated.
MINIMUM WORK QUALIFICATIONS
1. 3-5 yrs.of experience in supervision of either waterfront or
pool operations.
2. Must have a valid W.S.I. Red Cross Certificate.
3. Have a four year degree from an accredited college or
comparable experience.
1NTRODUC T ION
The following report outlines I:ho 1982 operation of the Mounds
O , View Parks, Recreation and Forestry Department aquatics program ;
including both Lakeside Park Beach and Edgewood Community Center
pool.
BREAKDOWN OF COSTS FOR POOL
Thoro wore Iwimty-six (26) per:;on:: employed part-time staff
durincl tho year of 1902 for t•he lidgewood Community Center pool.
Seventeen (17) were employed as Water Safety Instructors at the
hourly rate of $5.00. Six (6) were employed as Advanced Life-.
1
savers/a.ider at• the hourly wage of $4.00. One was employed as
a summer pool supervisor at an hourly wage of $6.00. Two were
employed as daytime pool coordinators at $8.00/hour. (See
exact breakdown in the appendix).
Budgeted amount for pool staff was $9,000.OU. Actual expenditures
were $10,903.50; thus having a $1,903.50 over -expenditure in
projected :staff employment.
SBudgeted equipment/T-shirts for pool operations was $400.00
(shown as in-scrviccand equipment in the budget book). Actual
I
expenditure was $1,017.75 which included the therapeutic
jladder, staff T-shirts and swimming equipment:luch as flippers,
diving pucks, whistles, clip boards, etc.
Budgeted expenditures for Edgcwood pool was $9.400.00 and
actual expenditures was $10,903.50, showing a $1,503,50 over
expenditure. Budgeted revenue was $9,400.00 (a wash account)
and actual revenue was $9,693.61 Therefore showing a $293.61
increase in projected revenue. Subtracting the over -expenditure
and the increase revenue, the result is a negative ($1,209.89) for
the 1982 pool program.
The breakdown of participants for each class offered during the
four quarters of the year is given in the appendix of this
• report,
- 2 -
POOL OPEN SWIMS AND LESSONS STATTSTICS
An average number of 900 swimmers participated in open swims per"
quarter. The yearly number being 3,600 swimmers at 50C/swimmer •�)
y
the revenue totalling epproximal.cly $1,800.00.
On t.hc o0cr hand, lesson revenues were $7,893.50 with about
623 participanCs. ;
2
BREAKDOWN OF IIEACII COSTS
There were six (6) persons employed during the summer of 1982,
a six week program, for the Lakeside Beach facility. Three (3)
were employed as Advanced Lifesavers at an hourly wage of
$4.31 and Lwu (2) were employed as Water Safety Instructors at
an hourly wage of $5.37. One was employed as Waterfront
DirveLor aL ,i salary of $3,500.00. (See the exact list in the
appendix of Lhis report.)
The amount budgeted for staff was $14,700.00 and the amount expvd
t.
was $13,889.55. Budgeted amounL for beach equipment, maintenant ,
and ;ill operaling co!;(!; olhur Lhan lifeguard stiff was $9,000.00;
actual amount expended was $6,759.70.
The LoLal amount budgeted for the beach operations was $22,500.00
of which $20,649.25 wa=.actually expended showing an over-projecti
of $1,950.75.
The beach received actual revenue (other than donations from the
two cities) by means of lessons and concessions. Budgeted was
$800.00 for lesson revenue with actual receipts of $456.00
therefore showing a ($344,00) under -projection. Budgeted was
$200.00 revenue for concessions and actual receipts gained was
$386.79 therefore showing a $186.79 over -projection. 4
- 3 -
•
Approximately 7.10 hours were open fur programming at the
Edgewoud pool during the year 1902. Approximately 630 hours
were open far use at Lakeside Beach within the 10 week season.
The pool employs over four times the number of staff persons
than at Lakeside Beach -
The pool functions as a primary program with a continuing
service whereas the beach is a condensed and intense short
life program. The pool employed part-time staff (except for
the pool coordinator and summer staff) and the beach employs
temporary, full -Lime staff. Pull -time temporary denotes a
person working a minimum of 40 hours per week.
The puol program prioritizes swimming instruction whereas
the beach pH ori.Lizus the facilitation of safe water
enjoyment.
ADMI N 1 STIOT 10:1
ACCulltilIulaLiVe costs for pool and beach administration are here
given:
Cindy .lolwsun wa:: t.mployud as Waterfront Director at a salary
of $3,500.00 I'or Lhc summer quarter, (1.0 week period). Cindy
Johnson also was employed as Pool Coordinator during the fall
quarter, (lu week period) for a salary of $1,954.00. Both
job salaric; for the month:; of May 1 - December 31 (a 3), quarter
time span) totalled $5,1154.00.
- 4 -
19112 SWIM STAFF
EDGKWOOD
POOL
tiAOR NOUR
EMPLOYER
DUTY
$5.00
Itrad I'clet':,ou
W.S.I.
$5.00
Mary IlurquLrom
W.S.I.
$4.00
Lynn Christensen
Lifeguard/aide
$5.00
.Ian Dukose
W.S.I.
$•1.00
Plork 11jel.lu
Lifeguard/aide
$4.00
Sara SLewert
Lifeguard/aide
$4.00
Date Tate
Lifeguard/aide
$5.00
Wendy Harris
W.S.I.
$5.00
Sue Lynch
W.S.I.
$5.00
Jeannie Vint
W.S.I.
$5.00 "
Carol Merker
W.S.1.
$5.00
Luri Aeplund
W.S.I.
$5.00
Beth Kruse
W.S.I.
$15.00
Chris McAninch
Pool supervisor
$:,.UU
kvnlic JeaLran
W.S.I.
$5.00
Lynne Mitchcll-Becker
W.S.I.
$4.00
Michael Bury
Lifeguard/aide
$5.00
Kcvan Callow
W.S.I.
$S.UU
Sheryl Larson
W.S.I.
$5.00
Lisa l:dsLrom
W.S.I.
$8.00
Cw:Lhia Johnson
Pool coordinator
$8.00
Ken Lalm
Pool coordinator
$5.00
Sue Anderson
W.S.I.
$5.00
Marcus Magnuson
W.S.I.
$5.00
Bob Andruss
$•1.00
Nancy Peterson
Lifeguard/aide
I1lID(B'PiiD . . .
. $9,000.00 EXPENDED
. , . . $10,903.50
n
u
R
19112 I9INTKR SWIMMING PROGRAM
Beg ill liar s , . , . . .
. . 15
1lutiinners . . . , . .
. . 15
PI U-buy illne s
5
I'I'('-boiiI1110rs
9
Advanced bogilmol.s,
10
1111c1'lll(:dl(IPC.
4
TMAL. .
, . 53
1902 SPRING SW1Mh1ING PROGRAM
Pro -beginners . . . . . . 10
Pro -beginners 21
Rell it nears . . . . . . . . 13
Bell i nners . . . . . . . . 14
1109inners . . . . . . . . 18
Parcul:-LOL . . . . . . . 15
Adult. beginners . . . . . 10
Adult intcrmodiato , , , 3
lulermedial.es . , . . . . 4
1111urmodiatas . . . . . , 14
Swimmers, . . . . . . . . 3
Swimmers. , . . . . . . I
Water exureisu , , . . . 3
Advanced beginners. 9
Advanced bugitillers • f,
TOTA1, 144
1902 IIALL SWIMMING PROGRAM
ParenL/toL . . . . . . . .
. 7
Gym '11' swim . . . . . . .
. 10
1
Adult lessons. . . . . . .
. 7
InLermedial.e/swimmer,. . .
. 5
IW(j i nncr 11 . . . . . . . .
. 1 I
Ilandi Capped . . . . . . . .
. 9
�
Parent/tot . . . . . . . .
. 12
Be(inner I . . . . . . . .
. 11
Adult lessons. . . . . . .
. 0
it
Swim 'n' slim. . . . . . .
. 13
Adult beginner . . . . . .
. 2
Parent/tot . . . . . . . .
. 17
InternediaLe/swimmers. . .
. 9
Advanced beginners
9
Beginner 11. . . . . . . .
. 14
!
TOTAL
144
1902 SIIMMRR SWIMMING PROGRAM
POUT. INSTRUCTIONS I SESS. II SESS. III TOT.
P`-- -"'-- 23 30 76
re-u,:y..�.�.��y 2�
Beginners 30 30 31 91
Adult Beginners 5 5
Advance Beginners 19 11 17 47
Swimmers B 4 11 23
In termed is to 9 9
ParenL/tot 19 5 24
I
Jr. Lifesaving G 6
LAKIIN I U1, PARR I NS'I'RUCTl ONR
r.
Beginners 21 10
Advanced Beginners, 5 2
TOTAL 319 ;�
Ow STAFF
Mary I1ortptronl
Scott Ford
Nancy Peterson
Sue 1lernhagen
Robert Andruss
Cindy Johnson
BUDGETED
1982 LAKESIDE PARK
TITLE WAGE
Lifeguard/aide $4.31/hour
W.S.I. $5.37/hour
Lifeguard/aide $4.31/hour
I,ifeguarrl/aide $4.31/hour
W.S.I. $5.37/hour
Waterfront: Director $3,500.00
$14,700.00 EXPENDED . . . . . $13,889.55
- R -
OPr•.RATIOI� G14 BRIGHTON NGACH AND POOL
rries a staff of approximately 20 beach and poo�I!
New Ilrighton ca
lifeguardu/in::lructors. A head lifeguard supervises the beach
il
and a POO1 SIIPCI•visur ovur.looks the pool • Hourly pay scale
is $3.35 - $6.23 per hour• The lementalcfunds provided byta parking
to function as well as supplemental
fee of 50G/car/time•
About two ycnrs ago the department employed one person to overseellf
both the buacll and pool programs• 1.1: was the opinion of the
progralll supervisor that this aUra l(jemob to expectssupervisionsbylone J;
because it is tono
o demanding 7
i
. Also, sn
person in two sites
cc the supervisor was also to Y
Leitch ..%W.1.IIIIilin
two sitelessos-
al the pool and guard at the beach, the ;?
supervisory role was unrealistic as well as impossible at the
two sites.
The New Brighton Parks and Recreation Department does share
beach and pool staff which is a successful venture. Therefore,
staff had the possibility of being scheduled for morning, i
afternoon and/or evening limes.
Pool lessons are held with a minimum of six and maximum of
fourteen per class with three to four classesn the
eor bpool at on
time. The pool program basically makes a profit
en
during any given season.
OPGRA'I'IOI OF IIOPKINs/MINNEToNKA 13EACII AND POOL
The Ilopkins; Parks and Recreation Uupartment pool and beach program,
be very unlike
I)Lirneverycllarge in(]pool onebeinghsmall. Theyerate also,
operas sites, J
operate swimming instruction at three pool sites.
Their beach Prol,Iram is it $45,000 hudgeted operation manningtellemany
personnel including lifeguards, concessionaires, g
ate
night watchmen, Parking lot attunclmlts and others. Daily attendan
at the beach is 3,0004,000. This is a seasonal program, wherea
the pool program is yearly.
I will not pursue the operations of Ilopkins/Minnetonka as we are
then Comparing apple:; to oranges.
- 9 -
RAMSRY COUNTY MACH MRATIONS
Ramsey County hires beach lifeguards under civil service
guidelines. Lifeguards are paid from $5.40 - 6.02/hour
depending upon seniority. Any beach having three or more
lifeguard:; also ha:: a senior lifeguard who supervises the
others ;it, .t nth'I" nl' :;5.t11 - ;fi.'lU/hrnn. A r:hief lifeguard
is employed la Lravel Lo all beaches inspecting operations.
ThL, watjv Uc,lin:, al. $7.218/hour.
Raulsey COUBLy will open one beach Memorial Day and all re-
mnininq baarhtm will upon ,tune 111. pin,t•,atinq hours are
12:30 - 8:30 p.m.
The lifeguards rotate positions every hour, working an eight
hour shift. One hour is spent in the first aid room where
they answer the phone, handle first aid problems and eat a
lunch. This is their rest time although they are still on
duty, It• is a paid time to be in the rest room.
All employees have reinstatement• rights and receive an
automatic cost of living pay increase. Most guards return
from 4 - 5 years.
-10- '
RECOMMI{RDAT I OM
It is ury rccununendalJon that: a seasonal head lifeguard be hired.
to supervise Lhe Lakeside (leach program. This person would al
servo an a lifoquard. would supervise staff and oversee the C%
daily beach I'uneLiuns and uperaLions. This person would be paid
an hourly wage and wuu.ld work a regular 40 - 60 hour work week.
Tile position would be directly supervised by the Aquatics
DirecLur and ultimately by the Director of parks, Recreation and
Forestry.
It is alms ury recummrml;ilion I.IiaL Lhe Aquatic Director position be
a pu'arancnt position at a salaried wage. This person would
supervise, Lrain and coordinate the entire aquatic staff, offer
standard swimming lesson curriculum, and deal with the programming
and operalion:. of the aquatic activities. This person would work
hand -in -hand with the program offerings on a yearly basis. This
person also would serve as a pool instructor. The aquatics
program would include daytime, evening. summertime and weekend
pool•operations as well as beach front operations.
My recommendation is that one aquatics director and one head
lifeguard be hired to oversee beach front and pool programs.
No parson dc:;ignalcd to suporviso two sites as well as instruct
and/or guard at both is an awesome task and spreds a person too
thin to perform well. Both sites need a designated supervisor.
1 do believe (.hat s WEE at both the beach and pool could be shah
to obtain maximum potential and service of all employees. Also
staff sharing provides more hours of diverse work and duties and
Lhus uicuurages good morale, diversity and various challenges for
the employee.
Staff empluyecs aL buLh sites would be paid at a rate of $4.00/
hour for advanced lifeguard and $5.00/hour for W.S.I. and $6.00/
hour to the head lifeguard. water safely instructor certified
Personnel would be preferred. This hourly rate would be for
both the pool and beach sites.
The beach head lifeguard position would be paid from the Lakeside
fund and the aquatics director would be paid from fee receipts
from the pool program. Therefore, the pool program would need
to run in a manner in which money would be made.
The pool program philosophy must modify to put more emphasis
into mass efficiency instruction a nl less emphasis in pool
availability to the leisure swimmers. Therefore, I would see
more efficient use of pool space. The instructor per student
ratio must be more controlled, efficient, and feasible rate. L
Staff must• be supervised on a frequent basis by the aquatics
director as to teaching techniques, pool rules, regulations and
program operations. Currently this is clone only on a hap -hazard
manner as the program Supervisor has minimal contact• with pool
staff dealing only with program goals and rules and regulations
of the operation. Intimate supervision is required at the pool it
of which only an aquatics director can give.
MEMO TO: Mounds View City Council
• FROM: Bruce K. Anderson, , lr r
Parks, Recreation an o s
DATE: March 31, 1983
RE: Silver View Park Bids
Phase I development of Silver View Park has been 95% completed
as of March 1, 1983. There are two remaining projects that
need to be completed at the park site; the first is outfield
fences for the two softball fields and skinning and installation
of rec rock in the two infields. We currently have a minimum
of $6,500 remaining in the Silver View Park account.
Staff has attached bid quotes from a number of firms to complete
the two projects and the bid tabulations are as follows:
FENCING - Century Fence Company $4,571.00
Crowley Fence Company $4,145.00
Cyclone Fence Company $4,283.20
REC ROCK - Bryant Rock Products $7.92/ton*
*There is only one firm that provides red ball diamond aggregate
that being Bryant Rock Products, Inc. That is the reason you see
only one bid price of $7.92/ton.
Staff would recommend that we award the fencing contract to the
low bid of Crowley Fence Company in the amount of $4,145.00
and the red ball diamond aggregate bid to Bryant Rock Products
in the amount of $7.92/ton. As can be noted, it appears that
the total projected expenditure staff is recommending would
total over $8,100.00 based on 500 tons of rec rock. Staff would
recommend that any amounts exceeding the current fund balance
in the Silver View Park fund account would come out of the general
fund park account 4121 building and grounds supplies. As staff
indicated, the figure of $6,500 is at this time based on the
low side as we have not received interest nor have we done a
final accounting of the Silver View Park fund account.
Once again, staff will be on hand at Monday night's meeting to
discuss the proposed expenditures at Silver View Park as outlined.
In conclusion, it should be noted that this issue was also brought
before the Parks and Recreation Commission at the their regularly
scheduled March 24 meeting and was adopted unanimously by the
Commission. Should you have any questions prior to Monday evening's
meeting, please feel free to contact myself directly at ext. #41.
BKA/sll
Attachment
r1
U
t'
'1 It
7ENTURY 1? iE
P.O. BOX 100
FOREST LAKE, MINNESOTA 55025
PHONE (612) 464-7373
OSAL TO. Mounds View Park & Rec.
2401 Hwy. 10
Moundsview, MN 55112
Attn: Bruce Henderson 784-3055
Sq
............
DATE: Mar. 30, 1983
5.
H
I
P
T
o Silver View Park
TALLED ® PREPAID a DELIVERY
,TERIAL ONLY F.O.B. ]obsite FREIGHT COLLECT SCHEDULE as required
CE OVERALL
,E Palisade HEIGHT __5'__—LINE POSTS_ C SPACING WOO SET drive
RIC 9-2 SELVAGE KK COATING AC GATE FRAME TOP RAIL C MIDDLE BOTTOM t wire
FURNISH AND INSTALL:
960 L.F. of chain link fence and toprail complete and bottom tension wire
8 - 3" O.D. end posts
TOTAL = $4,571.00
I Wi ms,:%F THE RIra
V • 'F 5S. ' .:HEO
• CEPTANCE: TH15 PROPOSAL -WHEN ACCEPTED IN WRITING BY PURCHASER AND BY CENTURY FENCE COMPANY'S MAIN OFFICE 1
BECOMES A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE TWO PARTIES. THE CONDITIONS ON THE REVERSE SIDE ARE MADE A PART .w
OF THIS CONTRACT.
' 5,,OF PAYMENT: NET CAtADPON RECEIPT.0!NVI110E OR AS OTHERWISE STATED HEREIN.
SUBMITTED
e
Crowley Fence Company, Inc.
10630 Nassau Street N.E. Minneapolis, Minn. 65434 612/7 41120
3026
DATE March 29.1983 PROPOSAL N0.
TERMS Net 30 days FOB: Jobsite
To: City of Mounds View Regarding Ballfield
2401 Highway 10
Mounds View, Mn. 55112
Att: Mr. Bruce Anderson
We propose the following. ❑ fmalsh oobr ® aun46.nd bawl ❑ rerm*o gad rela.wl ❑ other
960' 60" hi x 9 ga x 2" aluminum coated mesh with 2" line posts x 1-5/8"
SS20 top rail
8 2-1/2" terminal posts
All necessary appurtances, for the total cost of ................................. $ 4,145.00
Notes:
1. All end posts to be set in concrete, all line posts driven.
2. All framework to be round tubular sections with no open seams;
3. Add for 6' high fencing .................................... $ 785.00
4. Fencing to be installed prior to May 9, 1983
The above prices) is (are) firm for a period of 30 days from this date.
Thank you for the opportunity to quote op (,hie project A
Respectfully submitted
Terrill R. Wahl, Sr. Estimator
-- r-...,.:.:.:.--.:-.a-.: ---.---
ACCEPTANCE OF PROPOSAL
PROPOSALNO.N2 3026
The above prices, specifications and conditions are satisfactory and are hereby accepted You are
authorized to do the work as specified. Payment will be made as outlined above.
Signature: Dates
**.EASE SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR WARRANTIES AND CONDMONS
a :; C571
V00.01
r. V017 UPS Cyclone Fence
a . 6/
United Bill" 31181 CarpiraIlm
PROPOSAL TO:
•. ME
pity of Mbundsview
FIEET
2401 N E Hwy 10
NAME
S; lne
DATE March 25th 1983
_.— SNIP IU:._.
Moundsview, Ainnesoto —
SPECIFICATIONS
ERALL HEIGHT ABOVE GRADE
GRADE
BARB WIRE STRANDS _ FABRIC HEIGHT
60"
— P.V.C. COATED COATED
AIN LINK FABRIC —ALUM. COATED O WEIGHT OF .40 O•r. WIRE GAUGE 9
❑
GALVANIZED COATING
TED ❑
IEPOSTS—SHAPE C section
,PRAIL_ roll formed
•
P.V.C. COA SPACING
DIMENSION I F75X1.625 GALVANIZED
MIDDLE RAIL ❑ TOPTENSIONWIRE Cl none
none BOT TENSION WIRE ❑
MESH 211
SIZE
DRIVEFKU .
101 SETINCONCRETE ❑
nnTTOMRAIL ❑ — ❑
0&CORNER POSTS— roll formed 3�0-;
OUANTITY ITEM
MATERIALONLY
GATEPOSTS — none MATERIAL& INSTALLATION 0
PRICE
9601 complete fence per nbove specifications
8 roll termed end pusLs
NOTE:ALL STAKING, GRADING AND CLEARING BY OTHERS.
ALL 1+10RK TO BE COaPLLTED BY 5-5-83
PRICE PER FOOT INSTALLED FENCE $4.17
ALIKERMNALS INSTALLED IN CONCRETE 535.00 EACH
FRAMEWORKSTRENGTH
THEORETICAL MINIMUM BENDING FORCE ON CRITICAL AXIS
247 lbs _� 6'V'ABOVE GRADE
LINE POST 237 lbs
TOP RAIL fP 10'0" SPAN
TERMINAL 48
— OGfr' ABOVE GRADE
TOTAL $4283.20
Price subject to change after 5-15-84nd is based on all work performed
In 1 phase operationisl. Charge for each remobilieation
Add to totals for Installation alter�
layout, grades and corner stakes by others. Price It based on all lines
accessible by mobile equlPment unless otherwise speeilied In this propaul.
erected FREIGHT PREPAID
O.O. POINT --- COLLECT ❑
.nMS OF PAYMENT: Net Cash 00 Days or as otherwise listed herein.
,CEPTANCE: After receipt of signed Copy Imm Buyer, this proposal when accepted
by Cyclone Fence• at its General Offices In Jolle6 Illinois, or n still
district Islas office, becomes a contract between the two patties.
The conditions on the revise tide of this sheet an mode apart hereof
lioler through rock will be charged extra.
SUBMITTED BY'. �
/ '
Ricjc KUehjweln
JYEH'S SIGNATURE
641-8742
MAILING ADDRESS: $t PBUI,
rE
tourrNAl,
7
QUOTATION, OFFER AND ACCEPTANCE
N: _..687
SRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS, INC.
Box 215 • Shakopee. Minnesota 55379
(612) 445.3900 0 (612) 448-3600 Ref. No. 2449
DATE March 22. 1983
TO City of Mounds View AT
2401 Hwy. 10, hounds View. MN 55112 Purpose to furnish the following materials at the
prices herein indicated. In the event Bryan Rock Products, Inc. is subsequently awarded a
contract for this project City of Mounds View
ball
will execute a contract with the aforesaid party that will incorporate this quotation.
Location Cit -wide
Project Ballfields
Type of Material
diamond Aggregate
Size
Est. Tons
500
Delivery Price Per Ton
XXXIUM=
S8.17
Discount Price Per Ton
zdG'9xsAm
$7.92
Special Instructions:
These prices are good unlit j')-e-7
By '�-li�z^-
Title Sales Manager
ACCEPTANCE: We hereby agree to enter into a contract with Bryan Rock Products, Inc. to
purchase as described above and for the specific contract mentioned in the event that we are
awarded the prime or sub -contract for the above project.
TERMS: The discount price listed above will be effective only if purchases are paid in full by the
251h of the following month. Full delivery price due thereafter until the 30th. After
the 30th, a service charge of
1.33% per month will be added. By
Title
This proposal will be valid for 10 days from the dale listed above unless signed and returned.
INSTRUCTIONS: Ploobe + gn the white copy and return same to us. Retain Pink copy for your records.
MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Clerk -Administrator
O DATE: March 30, 1983
SUBJECT: MARCH 28, 1983
Recording Secretary Pam Rose and I have taken great effort to
ensure that the proceedings of the March 28th meeting are
accurately reported just as we do for all meetings. however,
due to the fact that there were several issues entailing
numerous motions of a complex and convoluted nature, we would
ask that the makers of motions make a special effort to review
their motions as reported by these minutes and assure themselves
that those motions are accurately reported.
Your attention to this matter would be greatly appreciated.
DFP/pf
C7
•
s
•
PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA
Regular Meeting
March 28, 1983
Mounds View Hall
2401 Hwy. 10, Mounds View, CMNy55112
----------------------------------------
The Mounds View City Council was called to order
by Mayor McCarty at 7:36 PM on March 28, 1983. 1 Call to Ord(
MEMBERS PRESENT: Councilmembers Blanchard, Doty,
Linke— Hankner and Mayor McCarty.
ALSO PRESENT: City Attorney Meyers, Clerk/Admini-
strator Pauley and Public Works/Community Development
Director Johnson.
Motion/Second: Doty/Linke to approve the March 14,
IfBT minutes as presented.
5 ayes 0 nays
Mr. Miller informed the Council he would like to
proceed with his development, and asked what the
proper procedure would be to follow.
Director Johnson stated that the preliminary plat
had been approved, with final approval being
conditional upon the execution of the development
agreement. Mayor McCarty suggested Mr. Miller
check with Staff, and if he did so immediately,
Council could discuss it at their next work session.
Mayor McCarty closed the regular meeting and opened
the water and sewer utility budget and rate hearing
at 7:40 PM.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley gave a brief summary of
the report Staff had presented to the Council at
their special session on March 19.
Director Johnson gave a presentation, explaining
life cycle costing as it applies to utility systems.
He presented pictures of water meters and roots
found in the sewer system, as well,as a sample of
water ta:cen from a residents home during the winter.
2. Roll Call
3. Approval of
Minutes:
March 14, 1(
Motion Carri
4. Residents
Requests ant:
Comments fre
the Floor
5. 1983 Water
Sewer Utilit
Budgets and
Rates Public
Ilenring
Mounds View City Council. March 28, 1983
Regular Meeting Page Two
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ile showed maps of the sewer and water system in Mounds
View, depicting when they were built, and summarized
wiLh his recununcndaLions for both the suwur and water
systems.
His recommendations Included a maintenance program for
the water system to the year 2000 at a cost of $42,500
per year and a 3-5 year capital improvement program at
a cost of $320,000. Ile also recommended an inspection,
maintenance and improvement program for the sewer system
at an annual cost of $33,100.
Finance Director Brayer gave a presentation, stating
that• Staff has made a detailed financial analysis of
the situation, and presented a proposed budget for
both the sewer and water systems. Finance Director
0rager reviewed the previous rates charged, versus
the proposed rates and the difference in cost in the
County's billing to the users.
The Council thanked Staff for the excellent job they
have done on this project.
Josey Warren thanked Staff for the thorough presen-
tation they made on March 19 and for the public
hearing. She stated that as far as rates are concerned,
she felt Staff's recommendations are very favorable,
and that while they are proposing a large percentage
increase, the City has not increased the water rates
since 1980, so when averaged out, would represent
approximately an 81 increase. She recommended that
funds be dedicated to cover maintenance and replacement
costs, and asked how the problem of a large increase
in one year could be avoided in the future, and recom-
mended appointing a citizens panel to review the problem
and make a recommendation to the Council.
Councilmember Doty replied that the Council must
set the rates yearly, and in order to avoid a yearly
increase, would have to set them higher now to plan
for the future. lie added he was not sure a citizens
group would be able to help out.
Mayor McCarty stated that maintenance to this point
has been a crisis type program, and they have found
the rates were not set high enough to meet the
depreciation rate of the equipment, and they must
look at the history of the City to understand how
the problem occurred. He pointed out they have hired
excellent Staff within the past few years and have
the situation in control. He added that while he is
in favor of a citizens group, the Council was elected
to represent the citizens and serve them, and he felt
between the Council and Staff they could work on the
problem.
M
Mounds View City Council
Regular Meeting
-------------------------------
March 26, 1903
Pagu Larne
-----------------------
Ms. Warren replied that as inflation occurs, the
net income will be eliminated, and the Council
should look at it and overcome this on -going
process.
a
Vo.
Gw
Mayor McCarty closed the public hearing and reopened
the regular meeting at 8:25 PM.
Motion/Second: Linke/Blanchard to approve Reso-
lution No. 1584, accepting the 1983 water and
sewer systems maintenance and capital improvement
program, and waive the reading of the resolution.
5 ayes 0 nays
Motion/Second: Doty/Blanchard to approve Reso-
lutio— n�85, adopting the 1983 water and sewer
utility budgets and increasing the water and sewer
rates, and waive the reading of the resolution.
Councilmember Blanchard - aye
Councilmember Doty - aye
Councilmember Linke - aye
Councilmember Hankner - aye
Mayor McCarty - aye
Motion/Second: Doty/Linke to approve the conscnt
agenda as presented, and waive the reading of the
resolutions, and note that there are resolutions
commending four Boy Scouts within the City, and
have the Clerk/Administrator read one of the
resolutions, with the names of the boys.
5 ayes 0 nays
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported that James
Benjamin Crowl, III, Jeffrey Albert Crowl,
Matthew Joseph Seidl, and Gregory Donald Worden
had all been awarded Eagle Scout status, and
read Resolution No. 1580. He added that they
will be invited to the first April meeting,
where they will be presented with signed. framnd
copies of the resolutions from the Council.
Councilmember Doty stated there is sufficient
area for the developer to develop under R-3,
without filling in the wetland, and that he
would still have to install some type of runoff
containment, with drainage going into the
wetland area to some degree.
Motion/Second: Doty/McCarty to not allow
filling of the wetland on the Poppelaars development
proposal, citing Chapter 49, Sub 2A, 2P, 211 and 21,
and 48.02, 48.03 and 48.04 of the City code, and
portions of Chapter 49 of the flood plain zoning
y
�\
i
Motion Carried
Motion Carried
6. Approval of
Consent Agenda
Motion Carried
7. Consideration of
Tony Poppelaars
Wetland Alteration
Permit for Lots 1
and 2, Park View
Terrace
Mounds View City Council
Regular Meeting
-------------------------------------------
ordinance, and if needed, have the item carried
on to another meeting to allow for further research
by Staff, and to have a resolution drafted.
9 ayes 1 nay
Councilmember Hankner voted against the motion.
There was ccnsiderable discussion between the
Council and Attorney Meyers regarding the develop-
ment of the land and the use of the lots, and
whether both lots should be considered together
or separately.
Motion/Second: McCarty/Doty to amend the previous
motion to include notification of denial of the
wetland alteration plus sending Lot 1 back for
further consideration by the Planning Commission.
5 ayes 0 nays
Director Johnson reviewed Staff's memo to the
Council. He stated the drainage issue has been
resolved with the applicant, with conditions to
be set forth in the development agreement.
Attorney Meyers reported a hearing was held on
the preliminary plat, and approval of the final
plat was given, but the development agreement has
never been entered into, with approval of the
final plat being contingent upon entering into
the development agreement. Thus, he stated,
there is nothing to extend. He stated the ordi-
nance provides that the plan be recorded within
120 days of'approval of the final plat or the
entering into the development agreement. However,
a 120 day extension is allowed under certain
circumstances.
Attorney Meyers stated he understood there may
be another developer involved now, and that the
transfer would require approval of the Council.
to insure the new developer will meet all the
requirements the original developer entered into
Mr. Eigenheer replied that the other developer
is still not definite, and is dependent upon how
he progresses with the City. He stated he has
been held up subject to the drainage easement on
County Road I, and has been between the County,
St. Paul Waterworks, and City of Mounds View as to
who will install the culverts.
Attorney Meyers stated a 120 day extension could
be granted to file the final plat, contingent
upon entering into the development between
Mr. Eigenheer and tha r and further approval
Would be nee&,^ t, transldr tn another developer.
March 28, 1983
Page Four
--------------
9
Motion Carried
Motion Carried
8. Consideration of
Extension of
Edgewood Square
Development
Agreement
11
Mounds View City Council
M.""ch 411, 1983
Regular Meeting
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Page Five
Motion/Second: McCarty/Hankner that the Council
approve the drainage plan for the Edgewood Square
development, and grant a 120 day extention on the
filing of the final plat, with final approval
based on Mr. Eigenheer entering into a development
agreement with the Council.
5 ayes 0 nays
Motion Carri
John Peterson of Good Value Homes, 1416 93rd Lane,
Blaine, introduced himself as the potential buyer
and stated he has an agreement with Mr. Eigenheer
to purchase the property, contingent upon Mr,
�{
Eigenheer receiving approval of the final plat and
development agreement.
Mr. Eigenheer stated that with approval, he would
like to have the name changed on the developemnt
agreement from Eigenheer Enterprises to Good Value
Homes. Mayor McCarty replied he should submit the
necessary information to Staff to have the name
„
changed.
Attorney Meyers reported the Civil Service 9. Acknowledge
Commission is certifying Sergeant Timothy Smith Receipt of
to be appointed Acting Police Chief of the Mounds Notificatiot
View Police Department. He reviewed the time of Appointm(
constraints and requirements of the provisional of Sergeant
appointment. Timothy Smi
as Acting
Motion/Second: Doty/Blanchard to appoint Police Chie:
Sergeant Ti othy Smith as provisional Police Chief by Civil Se,,
for the City of Mounds View, effective April 1, 1983. vice Commis:
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carri
Mayor McCarty reported Staff has recommended 10. Consideratic
hiring a Community Service Officer the middle of Pnlire
of April or begining of May, and it is a budgeted Dept. Memo
item. Regarding
Community
Motion/Second: McCarty/Linke to authorize Staff Service Off
to hire a Community Service Officer, with the Program
beginning and ending periods at the discretion
of the Clerk/Administrator, at the hourly rate
stipulated in the 1983 budget.
5 ayes 1 0 nays Motion Carr
Director Johnson reported he had received a letter 11. Report of
from Commissioner Braun of MnDOT regarding a meeting Director o:
on April 8. He gave copies of the letter to the Public Work.
Council and stated he would be attending the meeting. Community Dv
Mounds View City Council
Regular Meeting
---------------------------
Director Johnson reported the jet rodder needs
some major maintenance work that was not entirely
budgeted for in 1983. lie reviewed the proposed
work and costs.
Motion/Second: McCarty/Doty that the Council
approve the jet rodder maintenance, to be paid from
the sewer maintenance fund, for $1200.00, and
transfer from the equipment maintenance fund in the
1983 budget for a total of $2,050.00.
5 ayes 0 nays
Attorney Meyers reported he had spoken to the
bonding company for GTF, Inc., and their attorney,
and they are responding to the City's request to
have the work completed, and they will either get
the contractor back or will get a new contractor
out.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported he had just
received a letter from the bonding company, and
reviewed it for the Council.
Attorney Meyers reported that Mr. Jambor has
applied for a wine license at the Bel -Rae Ballroom,
and the Council could issue a wine license under
Chapter 100 of the municipal code, and that it would
not count under the number of intoxicating liquor
licenses the City can issue. He stated the fees
would have to be reviewed but that the wine license
is to be issued to a restaurant that regularly
serves meals to the general public, and the Council
would have to decide if they felt Mr. Jambor
regularly served meals.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley added that fees have
already been set,
Motion/Second: McCarty/Hankner to approve the
issuance ot a wine license to the Bel -Rae Ballroom,
Mr. Tony Jambor , under Chapter 100.
5 ayes 0 nays
Mayor McCarty stated it had come to his attention that
a group was using the name "City of Mounds View" and
felt action should be taken to halt it.
Motion/Second: McCarty/Doty to direct Attorney Meyers
to send to the Mounds View DFL Club, approv-
ing the use of the name "Mounds View DFL", but not the
corporate name "City of Mounds View DFL".
March 28, 1983
Page Six
Motion Carried
12. Report of
Attorney
Motion Carried
2 ayes 3 nays
Motion Failed
Mounds View City Council MRi•11i 28, 1983
Regular Meeting ,I _ Page Seven
----------------------------------------- --iJ}-------
Councilmembers Linke, Blanchard and Hankner voted
against the motion, and they all stated that while
• they did not object to contacting the DFL Club, to \
they felt it should be handled by a more informal 1
communication than an official letter.
Motion/Second: McCarty/Doty to direct Attorney Meyers
to ind i-there has been a violation of the statutes
addressing corporations and protecting corporation
names for the State of Minnesota.
2 ayes 0 nays 3 abstentions
Councilmembers Linke, Blanchard and Hankner abstained
from the vote.
Mayor McCarty called a 5 minute recess. Upon calling
the meeting back to order, he stated he had reviewed
Roberts Rules of Order, which states that a majority
vote rules, in light of abstaining votes, and thus,
the previous did pass as it had 2 ayes and 0 nays.
He asked Attorney Meyers to determine if the three
Council members had violated their oaths of office.
Councilmember Blanchard reported the Mounds View
Lions Club would be holding an Easter Egg Hunt at
• City Hall on April 2, for those ten years old and
younger. She asked that a notice be put on the
sign board in front of City Hall.
0
Motion Carr.
13. Reports of
Councilmemb
Councilmember Doty reported he had attended a
portion of the Park and Rec Commission meeting on
March 24 and gave the highlights of the meeting.
Motion/Second: Linke/Hankner to direct the Clerk/
A inistrator or City Attorney to contact the
Mounds View DFL Club and discuss with them, in an
informal setting, the misuse of the City's corporate name.
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carr
Councilmember Hankner reported she had been approached
by a member of the Groveland Park Association, who
would like to address the Council. Mayor McCarty
asled that they wait until the end of the meeting.
Motion/Second: McCarty/Doty to approve Resolution
o�$T, opposing the upgrading of the Anoka County -
Blaine Airport, and waive the reading of the resolution.
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carr
Mounds View City Council March 28, 1983
Regular Meeting Page Eight
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Motion/Second: McCarty/Doty that notification be sent
to our State Legislators, Representative Gordon Voss,
Representative Dan Knuth and Senator Steven Novak,
that the Mounds View City Council reaffirms our opposi-
tion to installation of precision instrument landing
systems at the Anoka County -Blaine Airport. Further,
that it is the City of Mounds View's opinion that installa-
tion of such precision instrument landing systems is
contrary to provisions in Minnesota Statutes 473.641,
Subd. 4, 473.181, Subd. 5, and 473.611, Subd. 5. Finally,
a copy of the letter of position regarding this matter,
from the City Attorney to Mr. Charles Weaver, dated
October 27, 1981 be forwarded to our legislators.
5 ayes 0 nays
Motion Carried
Councilmember Hankner asked what was included in the
October 27, 1981 letter, as she had never seen it.
Mayor McCarty summarized the letter.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported that in the 14. Report of
League of Minnesota Cities Legislative Bulletin, Administrator
there was an article about House File 748, which
would have a significant impact upon the labor
laws and would effect the City. Ile reviewed the
proposed revisions and stated he would be contacting
our legislators that the City was taking with extreme
umbrance the provisions of the bill, and will be '
putting a resolution together for Council consideration.
Motion/Second: Doty/McCarty to approve Resolution
No. 1589 opposing House File 748, leaving the body of
the resolution to Clerk/Administrator Pauley.
4 ayes 1 nay Motion Carried
Councilmember Hankner voted against the motion.
Paul Fedor of the Mounds View Lions Club, and Stan
Haugen, of the Groveland Park Association, addressed
the Council and asked for a clarification on where the
Council stands on the Lions Club holding a casino
night at the Bel -Rae Ballroom. Mr. Fedor stated the
•'•
Lions Club would like to financially assist the
°*•
Groveland Park Association, but needs a major fund-"
raising event to do so. He stated they would like
a,
! •>
to have a joint casino night, but they understand
'
(,
there is a problem with the law that stipulates
liquor cannot be served in conjunction with gambling.
t!
He stated they would be willing to guarantee that
r... ,
no liquor would be sold by anyone, nor any liquora
:)e consumed on the premises.
'Itt'rhey
/
Meyers stated he felt the Lions would qualify
for an �k'emption but that the Groveland Park Association
would
not, as 'they would have had to be in existence
Mounds View City Council March -14, 4981
Regular Meeting Page Nine
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
for six months, with at least 30 dues paying members.
4 Mr, flaugen stated they would be willing to run things
through the Lions Club,
Attorney Meyers reviewed some portions of the code
regarding liquor and gambling. He stated that not
serving liquor does not solve the problem according
to the law.
Mr. Fedor stated he could understand the problems the
City had earlier by allowing gambling at the Bel -Rae,
and suggested that if the ordinance is changed, the
Council consider raising the fees to an appreciable
amount, and consider waiving portions of the fee,
dependent upon the worth of the organization to the d
City. �✓
Councilmember Linke pointed out fees are set by
resolution.
Attorney Meyers stated they could make an exception
under 107, which could allow this, and should not
change the liquor ordinance.
Motion/Second: McCarty/Doty to table the Lions Club
request until the next regular Council meeting, giving
Staff an opportunity to thoroughly research the request
and come up with a recommendation for the Council.
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carri
Mr. Fedor reminded the Council of the Easter Egg Hunt
on April 2 and asked for all available Council members
to be present. He also asked permission for the Lions
Club to present a check to the Groveland Park Association,
at the next Council meeting, and have pictures taker" by
the press. The Council granted approval.
Councilmember Doty asked that Staff specify the types
of gambling allowed under State law. Clerk/Administrator
Pauley replied it is set in 107.
Motion/Second: Doty/Linke to adjourn the meeting at 15. Adjournment
Ib : n A
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carr.
Respectfully submitted,'
�•, Donald F. Pauley
v Clerk/Administrator
DATE APPROVVVt t; 28/li l
PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA
® Regular Meeting
March 14, 1983
Mounds View City Hall
�- 2401Hwy. 10, Mounds View, MN 55112
J- --------- -
The Mounds View City Council was called to order by 1. Call to Ord(
Mayor McCarty at 7:40 PM on March 14, 1983.
IJ
MEMBERS PRESENT: Councilmembers Blanchard, Doty, 2. Roll Call
Linke, Hankner and Mayor McCarty.
ALSO PRESENT: City Attorney Meyers, Clerk/Admini-
stratorFaa ley and Public Works/Community Development
Director Johnson.
Motion/Second: Doty/Linke to approve the February 3. Approval of
797 1183minutes as corrected. Minutes:
February 28
5 ayes 0 nays 1983
Motion Carri
Robert Eigenheer stated he would like to address the
4. Residents
Council on problems he is having with a stalemate
Requests ant
between the City and Eigenheer Enterprises, on
Comments fro
Edgewood Square. He explained he has been working
the Floor
with the City Engineer, but there are questions he
cannot answer and there are alterations he would like
to make to the development agreement. He added the
estimate he has from his low bidder is good through
April 20, so he must clear up the problems before
that. Mr. Eigenheer gave some examples of things
he would like to change from the development
agreement, such as putting up a model home before
putting the services in, to get a jump on the
season, and not putting the roads in until fall.
Mayor McCarty recommended Mr. Eigenheer submit in
writing the problems he is having with the develop-
ment agreement, and then come in at the next Council
agenda session, where the Council would be willing
to sit down with him and go over each problem in
detail.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reviewed the changes made 5. Approval of
to Resolution No. 1577. Consent Agent
Mounds View City Council - March 14, 1983
Regular MeetingPage Two
-------------------------- �--LL-A--- -=== -`- ===-------------------
Motion/Second: Linke/Blanchard to approve the consent _
agenda as presented and waive the reading of the
resolutions,
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Director Johnson reported he had presented a 6. Consideration
memo to the Council a week ago regarding the status of Memorandum
of new Trunk Highway 10. He explained the City has from John
been requested to send a letter from the Mayor to Johnson Regard
the Commissioner of Transportation, stating the ing Status of
City is in support of it and outlining the reasons New Trunk Hwy.
why. 10
It was the consensus of the Council that Mayor
McCarty should send a letter of support to the
Commissioner of Transportation.
Motion/Second:
Doty/Hankner to approve
the request
7. Consideration
Co re r. ohn Grahm as a part-time Water Depart-
of Staff Recom
went employee,
beginning June
at the rate of $5.00 per
13, 1983 for 100 working
hour,
days.
mendation
Regarding Hirii
of Part-time
5 ayes 0
nays
Personnel for
Water Dept. 1
Motion Carried
Director Johnson presented the Council with a copy 8. Report of
of the sketch of the Miller property, showing the Director of
areas that had been reevaluated. He added he has Public Works/
pictures available for the Council to look at. Community Dvlp
Attorney Meyers had no report. 9. Report of
Attorney
Councilmember Blanchard stated she had been getting 10. Reports of
phone calls regarding dog problems and suggested Councilmembers
the City do something regarding a CSO officer.
Motion/Second: Blanchard/Doty to have Staff
investigate the cost and so forth of hiring a
CSO officer, and report back to the Council.
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Councilmember Doty had no report.
Councilmember Linke had no report.
Councilmember Hankner ',d no report.
4 Mounds View City Council March 14, 1983
A, Regular Meeting Page Three
___________________________.:�_�a.__ -_'-._.�.�w---_____-_----------
•
E
Mayor McCarty had no report.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reminded everyone of 11. Report of
the 8 AM meeting on March'19 re,^,arding the 1983 Administrator
Water and Sewer Systems Maintenance and Capital
Improvement Program.
Motion/Second: Linke/Hankner to adjourn the meeting 12. Adjournment
at 7:56 PM.
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Re@'PV,ctfully
- -4
Dona l F, Pau
Clerk Adminis
ad,
J