HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packets - 1983/07/1851
G[TY OF MOUNDS VIEW
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA SESSION
.1uly 18, 1983
7:00 p.m.
1. Consideration of amendments to John Johnaocontract
for
professional services. (see 7/5 and 7/11 packeta
2. Consideration of 1984 Budget Policy Issues.
3. Prioritization of 1984 Capital Requests,
4. Consideration of memorandum regarding 1983 Clean Up Day
Profit/Loss statement.
5. Consideration of memorandum regarding Ramsey County Special
Assessment Records.
6. Consideration of Resolution No. 1633 Amending Resolution No.
1462 Establishing Various Fees and Charges.
7. Consideration of memorandum from Mayor McCarty regarding
Federal Cable TV Regulation.
B. Discussion of memorandum regarding probation period for Tim
Pittman.
raft
er to Mnt
ioner
9. regarding tTrunk ion fHighwayl10textensionnonorthmofsBraun
County Road J.
10. Discussion with Rice Creek watershed and City concerning
coordination of watland Ordinance and Comprehcnsivc Storm
Water Plan.
7
MEMO TO; Mayor and City Council
FROM: Clerk -Administrator
Finance Director
DATE: July 12, 1983
SUBJECT: 1984 BUDGET POLICY ISSUES
As has been indicated to you previously, several issues have
ariacn during staff's preparation of the 1984 Budget which ure
feel require Council at tendon and direction before cons Lructive
efforts can be made in the preparation of a second draft. Direc-
tion on the issues is being requested because they will impact on
the revenue and/or expenditure portions of the budget and
directly impact upon the ability of staff to present a coherent
and reasonably balanced budget.
As of the first draft, total requests for the General Fund were
as follows:
Total Projected General Fund devenues
(excluding items listed below) $1,399,034
Total Proposed Operating Expenditures 1,510,781
Total Proposed Capital Expenditures 146,620
Excess of Operating Expenditures over
General Fund Revenues ($ 111,747) or 7.4%
of expenditures
Total Projected Revenue Sharing Revenues $ 51,000
Total Proposed Capital Expenditures 146,620
Excess of Capital Expenditures over
Revenue Sharing Revenues ($ 95,620) or
65.2% of expenditures
A quick analysis of these numbers even with the knowledge that
the budget is in first draft and will experience shrinkage with
more strenuous perusal, will lead one to conclude that the task
of balancing the budget will not be ar easy one, but can be sim-
plified if the more difficult decisions are made in the early
stages thus giving everyone a clearer picture of the "problem"
during the second round. With that in mind, staff would like to
present you with a variety of budget issues which, once direction
is given, will clarify the scope of the budget balancing task
before us.
In order to obtain a full understanding of Items 1 and 2 and the
impacts of Items 1 through 4 on the City's General Fund budget,
please review the attached memorandum from Finance Director
Brager. Please note LhaL not all of the information needed to
develop accurate estimates Is available, therefore, certain
assumptions were made which are subject to change.
-2-
1. Local Government Aids - Article 5, Local Government Aids, of
the 19ti3 tlmulbus 'lix hill, II.F. 1259, cal is for a nuidilI-
ca tion In the formula For cnmpnting Local Government Aids,
LGA. The formula, in the case of most cities, including
Mounds View, wlII rrrsuIL In a reduction iu LGA, however, the
fill limits the Impact by stipulnLing that no rity experience
a reduction during any one year that Is more than it could
raise through a three -fourths equa!Ized mill levy.
Doe to some modifications in the formula for LGA, including
new factors not yet fully established, we are uncertain as to
the exact amount of the reduction for Mounds View, however,
it is estimated to be approximately $51,500.
It was staff's initial understanding that each city would
have cite option of special levying the amount of reduced LGA
when the total levy is certified to the County. We have now
been led to believe from information provided by the Revenue
Department that it is their intention to include the reduced
LGA in the individual levy computations for each city thus
eliminating the need to special levy. The decision then
before the Council is do we leave the reduced LGA in the levy
computations or do we reduce the amount levied, thus not
Levying up to the maximum, by an amount equal to the reduced
LGA?
2. Levy Limitation Increase - Besides the Increase in the levy
limits resulting from the addition of the reduction in LGA,
an additional increase results from the Revenue Department's
inclusion of the City's LGA allotment in the beginning of the
levy limit formula rather than at the end as had been past
practice. This change results in the application of the levy
limit formula to the City's previous year's levy plus LGA
which increases the amount that the City can levy by $42,716
above and beyond the $51,507 reduction in LGA. The obvious
question before the Council is do we wish to take advantage
of a "windfall" resulting from a statutorily mandated formula
or do we reduce the amount levied, thus not levying up to the
maximum, by an amount equal to the increase resulting from a
change in the formula?
3. Forestry Special Levy - Article 3, Levy Limits, of the 1983
Omnibus Tax Bill included the reinstatement of the special
levy authority for Forestry Program costs which was elim-
inated by the 1981 Omnibus Tax Bill. To the best recollec-
tion of staff, it has been the standard practice of the City
since inception of the Forestry Program to take advantage of
this authority. The question before the Council is do we
special levy for the cost of. the 1984 Forestry Program which
is proposed in the first draft at $23,201?
/".
-3-
4. E ui Tent Debt Certlftoo te - U.F. 372/S.F. 823 allows home
rule charter cities to issue capital notes (equipment debt
certificates), by resolution, to purchase public safety
equipment, road construction and maintenance equipment, and
other capital equipment with a useful life no less than the
term of the certificate.. The certificates are limited to a
term of five years and they may not have a total principle
amount exceeding one -tenth of one percent of Line City's
assessed valuation.
Until Budget Year 1983, the City regularly issued these
certificates for the purchase of police squads. It was then
determined that the City Charter does not provide authority
for issuing such certificates. Staff requested that the
Charter Commission consider amending the Charter to provide
such authority, however, they determined that they did not
wish to do so unless and until the City's revenues were
unable to meet budgetary needs.
As you can sec, the City's General Fund revenues fall far
short of operating and capital needs and the addition of the
projected 1984 Revenue Sharing allotment of $51,000 does
little to close that gap. The use of an equipment debt
certificate would allow the City to satisfy more of our
capital requests which are increasing due to the increasing
age of our physical plant and equipment and requests to
invest In the improvement of our parks system.
Staff would recommend that the Council consider the issuance
of an equipment debt certificate in the principle amount of
cii n_n_n_ Fnr rho purchase of two squad cars with a term of two
years which, at 9% interest, would equal $26,105 or 113,05
per year.
5. Special Assessments - As was mentioned under Item 3, staff
projects 1984 Federal Revenue Sharing receipts at $51,000
which is only ?4.7% of the first round General Fund capital
requests of $146,620, please note attached memo outlining
capital rennests. At this time, the Ravenna Sharing program
has not been renewed and current appropriptions will expire
on September 30, 1933.
Of the $146,620 in capital requests, $60,000 is being pro-
posed for the 1984 sealcoat and overlay program. From pre-
vious discussions, it would appear that we all agree that a
regular sealcoat and overlay program for the City's streets
increases the useful Life of the streets which reduces the
need for pavement replacement and the resulting large assess-
ments on abutting properties. (Please note attached letter
from Dan Boxrud dated July 16, 1983.)
-4-
As it would appear to he a rresnnahl0 conclusion that the
City wishes to continue to maintain streets nn a regular
basis with sea lcoat and overlay, the question before its is
how do we continue to do so when the City's other capital
needs are increasing and our traditional source of funding
for such Items, Revenue Sharing, is in it decreasing or nt
best stable level of funding? Ouc LO our limited options for
funding capital projects, staff would recommend that the
Council discontinue the funding of the Street Maintenance
Program with Federal Revennc Sharing funds and assess these
costs over a five year period (average frequency of main-
tenance for it street) to the benefited (abutting) proper-
ties. Such an action would release Revenue Sharing funds for
use on one-time projects as has been the past practice of the
City.
The cost per abutting property owner fur such a program would
be quite minimal and can he. Illustrated by using the 1982
Scalcoating Project. The information developed is as
follows:
Total footage sealcoat 39,742 ft.
Total project cost $52,390.42
Cost per foot $1.32 ft.
Cost per average 90 foot lot $118.80
Based on a five year assessment at 9% interest on the out-
standing balance, a property owner would pay a total of
$152.70 if the assessment were not prepaid, or $30.54 per
year.
Staff acknowledges that these are extremely difficult issues we
place before you, but we hope you will agree that they are
extremely important and the decisions resulting from your consi-
deration will be major building blocks in the development of the
1984 Budget. We stand ready to respond to any questions or
requests for additional information you might have and look for-
ward to a positive exchange of viewpoints during the discussion.
F
J
J
1
TO: Mayor & City Council
FROM: Finance Director -Treasurer Brager
DATE: July 13, 1983
RE: ESTIMATED 1984 REVENUE•.
A memorandum from t.hc Clerk-A(1mi.nis U-ator and myself identifies some
1984 budget policy issues facing the City. This memorandum will address
those issues and identify their impact on the 1984 General Fund budget.
The State's legislators, through the Omnibus Tax Bill, made changes in
the levy limit formula, the formula for the calculation of local govern-
ment aids, and the special tax levies allowable to municipalities. If
the 1984 General Fund budget is to be patterned after the 1983 budget
the fol,inwing assumptions would be made:
1) the City would absorb the anticipated 1984 reduction in
local government aid of $51,507
2) the City would not exercise the option to special levy
for the forestry program
3) the City would not issue equipment debt certificates and
levy for the cost of debt service to retire them
4) the two police squad cars requested would be included in
the 1984 Police Department's budget
Following those assumptions the estimated 1984 General Fund tax levy
would be $672,784.00, an increase of approximately 86 over the 1983
levy of $619,884.00. Total estimated General Fund revenues of
$1,399,034.00 would be available to offset estimated expenditures.
Estimated 1984 revenues are approximately 2.8% greater than 1983 budgeted
revenues of $1,360,890.00. Estimated 1984 revenues compared to first
draft expenditure requests are shown below:
Estimated revenues $1,399,034.00
First draft expenditure requests 1,533,781.00
Excess of expenditures over
revenues $ 134,747.00
To balance the budget, reductions of $134,747.00 would have to be made
from first draft expenditure requests. Those reductions amount to 9%
of initial requests.
Should the City exercise all of the options available under the Omnibus
Tax Bill the following would occur:
1) the City would levy the amount of the reduction in local
government aid from 1983 to 1984
July 13, 1983
Estimated 1984 itevenuc
page 2
2) the City would levy CIoVL iln,1lil� J;%1 formulrLoulLas, from the
change in tale local I
}) the city •::oU111 t'xel'cie:o il� option Lo special levy for
the forestry progr'.11 he
4) two year equipment• debt certificaLos wo�srinoi�alsand and
ld
the City would special levy one year's p
interest on the certifieaLcs
Exercising the above options would result in an estimated 24% General
Fund tax levy of $790,207.00, an increase of approximately 29,457.00the
1983 levy of $619,
884.00. Estimated total revenues c Underthisoption
would be available to offset estimated expenditures.
estimated 1984 revenues are approxiately Ihigher than
mbudgeted
1984 re
revenues of$1, expenditure are timatedshown below;venues compared
t to first
draft
$1,539,457.00
Estimated revenues 1,533_ 781 00
First draft expenditure requests
76.00
Excess of revenues over expenditures $ 5,6 option
The General Fund budget would be balanced under this option and a small
amount would be available for either contingency or fund balance develo>
ment.
please note that under each option presented above that the only capital
(li
wer
urer
items included
otiser capital rn-.questsearetethe
�tpolicewo squad
proposedtobefundedfromother
cars.
sources.
results from a change the levy limitation formula. The previous
The "windfall" referred to i9.thhe memorandum entitled "1984 Budget Policy
issues,, I
formula began with the prior year's levy limitation. Adjustmenthe ts or
o ulation were made to arrive �trior year'st
inflation and an increase he p p government aids.
year levy limitation. The cuss certifiedelocalwgo the p
levy limitation and the prior year'
Adjustments are made for inflation and an increase in population to arrive
aovernmentthe
said isysubtracted5e Therresultantthat afigure istthe iplocal
q
d to
limitation. The
gg3usInclusion of11983acertifiedllocal governmenation is t aid
be this
approximately
in this year's formula resulted in an increase in the estimated levy
limitation of $94,223.00 compared to what it would have been under the
old formula. That amount consists of the following:
Reduction of 1984 local government $51,507.00
aid compared to 1183
8% of 1983 certified local 42,716.00
government aid $94 223.00
July 13, 1983
• estimated 1984 Revenue
Page 2
I have calculated estimated mill rates for each (jption, most likely
these mill rate estimates are on the high side for several reasons. The
estimated Assessed Valuations obtained from Ramsey County do not include
fiscal disparities values, which are not yet available. The levy for
bonded indebtedness was based upon the ol(l special assessment debt study;
the new one won't be available until late August or early September.
Levy limit calculations and local government aid amounts are preliminary
estimates and are subject to change. The Department of Revenue is re-
quired by the Omnibus Tax Rill to provide those figures no later than
August 15.
Should the first option, patterning the 19804 budget after 1983, be adopted
the over all mill rate would rise 0.9240 mills to 13.38-5 mills. A com-
parison to 1983 mill rates is presented below:
Funds
1984
1983
Difference
General
10.888
9.989
+0.899
Forestry
0.376
0.347
+0.029
Debt
2.122
2.126
-0.004
13.386
12.462
+0.9240
If the second option, exercising all levy options available pursuant to
provisions of the Omnibus Tax Bill, be adopted the over allmill rate
would be 15.780 mills, a difference of 3.318 mills over the 1983 mill
rate of 12.462 mills. These rates are compared to 1983 rates below:
Funds
1084
19R3
Difference
General
13.022
9.989
+3.033
Forestry
0.382
0.347
+0.035
Debt
2.376
2.126
+0.250
15.780
12.462
+3.318
The memorandum on budget policy issues idenLitied the issuer relating
to tax levies. These are:
1) Should the City levy for the toss of local government aid?
2) Should the City take advantage of the change in the levy
limit formula and levy to the maximum allowed?
3) Should the City special levy for the Forestry program?
4) Should equipment debt certificates be issued and the City
levy for their principal and interest?
f�
4
r
July 13, 1983
Estimated 1984 Revenue .
Page 3
Exercising those options accounts for the differences in revenues and
mill rates between the two options presented. The dollars and mill
rates for those options are detailed below. Please note that the mill
rates given identify the effect on the over all mill rate. Allocation
amongst individual funds will vary slightly.
Dollars Mills
Total tax levy -budget 827,107 13.386
patterned after 1983
Local government aid loss 51,507 0.945
Change in levy limit formula 42,716 0.784
Forestry levy 23,201 0.426
Debt certificate 13,053 0.239
Total tax levy -exercise all 957,584 15.780
options pursuant to Omnibus,
Tax Bill
The differences in General Fund revenues between the two options are
detailed below,
General Fund Revenues
Budget patterned after 1983 $1,399,034
Levy for local government aid loss 51,507
Change in levy limit formula 42,715
Forestry levy 23,201
Proceeds from sale of equipment 23,000
certificates
Budget pursuant to exercise of all $1,539,457
options under Omnibus Tax Bill
The special levy for Forestry increases the General Fund':s revenues
beeausu without it monies that would otherwise be nvailable for the
General Fund are used to finance Forestry activities. The special levy
thus allows those monies to then be used for General Fund purposes.
The equipment debt certificates, as proposed, would be issued for a term
of two years and sold to the Water Fund. The proceeds of the sale,
$23,000.00 would be transferred to the General Fund and would be used
to purchase two squad cars. The levy shown for the certificates is for
the first year's principal and interest. It is considered a debt levy
and as such included .in the amounts levied for bonded indebtedness. When
received from the County money rrom the levy would be placed in a Debt
Certificate fund and subseyueuLly transferred to the Water Fund to pay
off the certificates.
1
July 13, 1983
Estimated 1984 Revenue
Page 4
/ nformation needed to calculate the effect of these options on the tax
Dills of selected individual properties was not available as of the
writing of this memorandum. When the information becomes available I
will submit a report to you.
Should you have any questions do not hesitate to conLacL me.
DB/ds
i
r
MEMO TO: Mayor. and C.iLy Council
FROM: Clerk -Administrator, l
DATE: July 13, 1983
SUBJECT: 1984 CAPITAL REQUEST PRIORTTI%ATION
Attached to this memorandum please find a listing of the 1984
Capital Requests and a copy of the Prioritization Grid to be
used in establishing a priority ranking for the capital requests
submitted in the first draft of the budget. The prioritization
of these requests will be impacted by decisions you make during
discussion of the previous agenda item relating to 1984 Budget
policy issues.
The purpose of (:his exercise is to provide staff with direction
that will assist in the preparation,oT the second draft budget
and the Federal Revenue Sharing Budget for 1984.
Department (leads will be performing this uri.oritization exercise
during the workday on Monday, July 18th, and the results of their
prioritization will be presented to you for your consideration
prior to your undertaking the prioritization exercise.
A full explanation of each of Lhe capital reryuestswill be given
during the pr.i.orilization exercise, however, should you have any
questions or require any information prior to the July 18Lh meeting,
please do not hesitate to contact me.
DPP/pf
Attacnment-s
19R4 CAPITAL REQUESTS
Mt_.INTIiNANCE GARAGIi
1. Ceiling Fans $ 1,200
CITY HALL
2. Roof Repairs 11,000
POLICE
23,000
3.
Two Squad Cars
500
4.
Investigator's Office
2,650
5.
Two Portable Radios
170
6.
Two Rechargeable Flashlights
150
7.
Two Squad Car Cages
8.
Two 35mm Cameras
20
1 0
9.
One Office Chair
1.500
10.
Garage Door Replacement
•_ COhIPIUNiTY_Dli_VIiI.OPPIIiN'f
580
11. Metal Detector
J STREETS
12. Sealcoat and Overlay Program 60,000
PARKS
13.
Seven Park Signs
800 1
14.
12 Playground Benches
,0
1,800
15.
12 Picnic Tables
I200
,
16,
17.
Hockey Rink Fencing
Oakwood Park Grading and Turf Estabiishment
2,000
7,00000
18.
Project Fund
8,
19.
Random Park Tot Lot
500
5
20.
21.
Volleyball Court
Remove Utility Pole.^, at Oakwood, Cruv+land, and
2,400
22.
Hillview Parks
Groveland Park Shelter Window Modification
500
1► 500
23.
Mower/Tractor
a
N
ry
.Nir
N
N
1 V
fQ
2
N
IN
N
T
IV
N
fT,!
NI N
N
N
N
.:Iv
rp�v
nN
I
I
N N
N�.b
N
N
.-(
N
m V
n
I
00
I
P O
I N
N
N
N
N
I
N N
10
N
Go0%
N
N
N
N N N
:NmIT
bddbdb
v XnalO p
u n 0 0 0 0 0 0 N( u.! (u� 0
N N N N N N
a n
d II
tl 0 A
d 0
p
tl
tl d
-�NM4
0%0N
coo
o-.
.
Nc�
.
-IT '^%DNco0%
(n V L9 0 n 00
y M ti .Ni ytI\i OD IPI 17I N N N 1 N N
ti fV l+1 v Vl n W T b T J
1 1 1 1 l L I L 1 1 N I I N
O -•i N M V �/1 �D n f0 P •+ N ((1 V N
�.-� T
+ N c'1 V
co P O ^( N (''1
.i fV m y n N b fV (�1 V N b n a10
N 00 P O .-( N m V h b n 07 P O -+ N t+1 V V1
%O n co P O N M V h 0 N c0
N b n 00 P O ^+ N t1 t N I n 00 P O
V v1 �D n w P O N m 'T 0'o N 0 m N N N N N N
.i N I(1 v N n 00 fT p y N
fD P O -+ N M V 0 •D f. 00 P O .� IV V
I 1 1 I I�I I�I II I I I I II N N IN
I1 nfN
N m dII 0 0 N N P O .-+i N M VIIi DI n 00 I0,
N t+1 V n W (T b ti .Nlr t'1 y N OD N 14 N N
I
MEMO TO: Department 11cads 1
ro*% FROM: Clerk-Administrater�y_ JI
DATE: July 13, 1983
SUBJLCT: 1984 CAPITAL REQUEST PRIORITIZATION
Attached to this memo please find a listing of the 1984 Capital
Requests submitted in the first draft or the City's 1984 Budget.
Included with that listing is a Prioritization Grid which will
be used during the special Department head meeting on Monday,
July l8th, at 10:00 a.m., at which time the Department Reads will,
as a group, prioritize all of the capital requests on a City-wide
basis.
For those of you not familiar with the Prioritization Grid, this
method provides a one-on-one comparison of each of the items, with
the individual and group determining Which of the two items being
considered is more important than the other. At the end of the
evaluation of all of the items ranking is established by determining
how many times each item was determined to have a higher priority
over any other item and giving No. 1 priority to that item which
received highest priority and lowest ranking to that which received
the lowest priority. For your preparation for the special meeting
( I would simply ask that you review these items as best you can
�-- based on the Limited information you have available and be prepared
to discuss not only those items proposed by your Department(s) but
also those proposed by the other City Departments.
f DFP/pf
Attachments
N
19114 CAPITAL REgUHSTS
MAINTENANCE GARAGE,
1. Ceiling Fans $ 1,200
CITY HALL
2. Roof Repairs 11,000
. POLICE
3.
Two Squad Cars
23,000
4.
Investigator's Office
500
5.
Two Portable Radios
2,650
6.
Two Rechargeable Flashlights
170
7.
Two Squad Car Cages
150
8.
Two 35mm Cameras
300
9.
One Office Chair
120
10.
Garage Door Replacemeot
1,500
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
11, Metal Detector 580
STREETS
12. Sealcoat and Overlay Progrcm 60,000
PARKS
13.
Seven Park Signs
2,250
14.
12 Playground Benches
1,800
15.
12 Picnic Tables
1,800
16.
Hockey Rink Fencing
1,200
17.
Oakwood Park Grading and Turf Establishment
2,000
18.
Project Fund
7,500
19.
Random Park Tot Lot
8,000
20.
Volleyball Court
500
21.
Remove Utility Poles at Oakwood, Groveland, and
Hillview Parks
2,4L"
22.
Groveland Park Shelter Nlndow Modification
1,500
23.
Mower/Tractor
16,500
N
M
7
II
fV
7
N n
CJ fIh
�I
Ivrk,
M
N fit V
N t'i VV
N
��It
ti N N N
N1 NI
N
I
� � ON N
N IN
cl
IN
N W 0 014
N I NI
N N1
I NI
I N r
W
n OMD
f!
0 o a,
p�
N1 I N
N I N
NII N
.'y N 14 Jr
IIIIIIIIIIII
n q q q a q II q {� qJ rrII�� II yyn�
7i 0 %0 1- 110 ol N N N N N N
IIIIIIIIIiII
u p II u a u u a n a d g n
N f', 7 to to n c0 0 O —� .Ni M
R ti .a
7 h%^ co m N N N CI N
M 7 to z N of m O ^+ N N N
N1 INI N
II NC'1 �'T JI tD n W
ti ti '1 ^I
Nm1711Cb�b����
rP.J1 f.+'7� N
O -� N M 7 �'1 Z f` coO, N N N NI N
D. O N m 7 to tO n f0 D,
I N I I 7 I 1 I n W I Ck b 1 N N V 1 L I I
.� t'1 .+ N m b n
W N O ^y N O V to t0 t\ 00 A N N N N N N ^I ti ti ti ^I ^I II
It N C, v Jl r' 4 ((� b I• fY ii v J, r� W
I. O M O I+ IN M IV INI tO N� 00 fT1 O II INI ffN++1�t 7 I
I I A Jr J, tD n N lT b IfV til V N d I� Ob Ot N
0 N WI mO� -I N f"d 7 to tp N
I. N r^'T to 6 �10, J, b Aft
h tD t\ W 0 O .Ni .f`1'1-1 4I 0 'D O I0I 0
1 N INI INI N N
.'-I N V n W T O ti N M v N tD n W fT I
N Irk
7 N ,O N WI at O ti I NI I�I7i ✓ti I�I 1� 0I�0 I� N I NI N N N N
PI 7 to N N o T O �. N f+, .7i N t0 n O N O N N N
1Ni 1ti J,
�
N m V Vl tD N UO frt O m 7 to t0 f. D\ -�
�'fb'J,,blbib7i 1J,�600�bd,b�lf"+�I
N 7 n Ot ti ff phi .w N N N N N
U
q MEMO TO: Mayor and Cit,
1 FROM: Clerk-Adminis
DATE: July 12, 1983
SUBJECT: 1983 CLEAN UP DAY PROFIT/LOSS STATEMENT
Attached please find a copy of the 1983 Clean Up Day Profit/Loss
Statement showing that expenses exceeded revenues by $456.03 which
is a significant reduction compared to the 1982 Clean Up Day where
expenses exceeded revenues by over $900.00.
Staff will be reviewing this information in the preparation of the
second draft of the 1984 Budget to determine whether or not
additional monies should be allocated for Clean Up Day expenses.
DFP/pf
Attachment
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
1983 CLEAN-UP DAY P/L STATEMENT
REVENUE:
1983 Budget Allowance $1,000.00
Charges/Payments 484.25
Total Revenues $1,484.25
EXPENSES:
Rubbish Hauling $1,560.00
12-30yd boxes x $130/box
Public Works Overtime 138.38
Food for Workers 41.90
Brush Removal 200.00
Total Expenses $1,940.28
Net Profit (Loss) ($456.03)
LIt, 5-
MEMO TO: Mayor and City Counci
FROM: Clerk -Administrator
DATE: July 11, 1983
SUBJECT: RAMSEY COUNTY SPECIAL ASSESSMENT RECORDS
As you may recall, during the presentation of the 1982 Financial
Statements for the City of: Mounds View, our auditors indicated
that significant delays occurred in the preparation of their
audit work due to the inadequacy of special assessment records
maintained by Ramsey County. It was determined at that time
that Mayor McCarty send a letter to County Commission Chairman
Warren Schaber outlining our concerns and requesting that the
County undertake measures to insure that special assessment
information is available on a timely basis. Attached to this
memorandum please find a copy of Mayor McCarty's letter, as well
as a copy of the response from Commission Chairman Schaber.
Also attached is a copy of a memorandum from Finance Director
Brager to myself responding to statements in Commissioner Schaber's
letter.
I would not only concur with the conclusions reached by Finance
Director Brager regarding the fact that special assessment records
are not maintained on the County's computer system which is an
extremely advanced system and more than capable of handling these
records but would also add the following comments and conclusions:
1. This office receives c-epies of all n=— Co�;,i—on
r
meeting minutes and it is my observationithat on a regular
basis the County Commission has waived their hiring freeze
and allowed the filling of positions in areas where the
need for the positions is no greater than that experienced
by the Tax Accounting Section of the Revenue Division of
Ramsey County. I am not aware of any attempts being made
by the Revenue Division to request the County Board authorize
the hiring of new employees to replace employees lost as a
result of death, retirement, reassignment, or promotion as
indicated in Leonard F. Olson's memorandum of June 17, 1983.
2. In a memorandum from Leonard Olson to Lou McKenna, dated
October 11, 1977 and included in the attached information,
Mr. Olson cites Minnesota Statute 429.061, Subd. 3, which
states in part, "All assessments and interest thereon shall
be collected and paid over in the same manner as other
municipal taxes." In my opinion, this clearly places the
responsibility for the collection of assessments on the
counties as they are responsible for collection of all other
municipal property taxes and,without requesting an opinion
from the City Attorney, it would appear that the County does
not have the authority to charge for these services as they
are statutorily required. This would seem to contradict
-z-
Commissicn Chairman Schaber's comment that the County is
providing a "free service" to the municipalities or
Mr. McKenna's comment that there is no logical reason for
Ramsey County to collect assessments for municipalities.
It strikes me that it is interesting that the Countatutety is sand
unwilling to collect asssessments as provided
at the same time they are more than willing to ctas theno
collection agency for traffic tickets, particularlyime
court costs are involved anaggressive roletintmatterssit suchlasttheseoandspoint
assume a more out to the County
that they are benefiting from municipal activities
in other ways.
I do not wish to begin a battle with Ramsey County over this or
any other issue, however, at the same time I feel it is necessary
we begin to defend our position on issues such as this ns our
revenue base is regularly being diminished by the a ctfacing aopositionher
governmental jurisdictions and we are quickly
where we will be unable to provide those services expected and
demanded by the residents of our community because of reduced
revenues.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff would recommend that Mayor McCarty or a
representative of the City Council and members of the City staff
meet with Commissioner Schaber and members of the Ramsey County
staff to discuss this issue and other related matters to edw,
a clear understanding on these issues and maintain goodwill
between the City and County.
DFP/pf
Attachments
TO: Clerk -Administrator Pauley
FROM: Finance Director -Treasurer Brager
DATE: June 29, 1983
RE: LETTER FROM WARREN W. SCHABER REGARDING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
i've reviewed the June 17, 1983 letter to Duane McCarty from Warren
Schaber and the attached memorandums from the Taxation and Records
Administration Department concerning the matter of special assess-
ments. While I can appreciate the staffing problems or" the Depart-
ment of Taxation and Records Administration caused by County budget-
ary constraints I non the less feel that as the City's collection
agent for special assessments information on outstanding balances
should be provided on a timely basis. In addition I feel that part
of the problem has been brought on by the Department itself. It is
my understanding that the County has a state of the art control data
computer and the County Treasurer's office has utilized that computer
system in connection with their job of collecting property taxes and
special assessments from County residents. However, the Department
of Taxation and Records Administration has not chosen to utilize the
computer system in the special assessments area. At the present time
they have a manual system to which they post data which is computer
generated on assessment collections to their manual set of books
�. which contain the balances on individual assessments. I am therefore
of the opinion that the County should provide these balances on a
timely basis in spite of their staffing and budgetary problems.
Mr. Schaber indicates that the County is currently considering charg-
ing for the collection of special assessments and the record keeping
.w .. am y a(n1}V withina5avviaiwd with uhc:;.nwaaen.�_—c.T onar,raraof
the State of Minnesota that is presently charging for this service.
I would suggest that the City Attorney research applicable Statutes
in order to determine whether or not the County would be able to
charge for these services. I would not be in favor of paying for a
service which traditionally has been provided to us at no cost in the
past.
RTCE
Marren W. 5ehaher
CHAIRMAN
BOARD OF RAMSEY COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
316 COUIt•I' HOUSE
DISTRICT 6 ST. PAIII„ MINNIiSOTA 55102
rnST SIDE 613.298-4145
.Tune 17, 1983
Mr. Duane W. McCarty, Mayor
City of Mounds View
2401 Highway 10
Mounds View, Minnesota 55112
KAREN OAi10ER
ADMIYISTIIATIVE ASSISTANT
Dear Mayor MCCarly:
-- Enclosed are several memorandums from the Taxation and Records
Administration Department concerning the matter of special assessments for
yours and other nlumicipaliliCS io Ramsey County. I hope that the explona-
tion or why these rinal balances am not available at a time which
corresponds with your book closing explains this rather complicated
matter.
You will note that
Sincerely,
i.
Warren W. Scch'aber, Chairman
Ramsey County Board of Commissioners
0is!riC! 6
cc: Richard Drubacher, County Executive Director
Pete Schneiders
Encls.
��rrr�`•�`.-7i:.'...� crvv¢...U+..o-7..7�CD�acN
�.,r,L.Qari.^4.e� j..r�a.ZJ,�.c2•/rri�`c`
DEPARTMENT OF
TAXATION AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION
COUNTY OFRAMSEY
113.138 COURT HOUSE
ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55102
LOU !ncKENNA
Dlroctnr
ROGEn VIK
Ass(. 00800r
MEMORANDUM
TO: Warren Schaller
Board of Ramsey County Commissioners
FROM: Lou McKenna, Director
Department of Taxation and Records Administration
DIVISION MANAGERS
JOHN 0.LEWIN
Property Vetun lon
WILLIAM M. KILLEEN
RpYenue
C.THOMAS OSTHOFF
Records
EUGENE H. GIBBONS
Property Ownership
DATE: June 17, 1983
Enclosed is all explanation from the Assessments Section concerning
wily financial balances are not complete in lime for the City of Mounds View to
close their records. In addition I am enclosing a memorandum from Leonard Olsen
to me, dated April 211, 1981, concerning the casts of collecting local government
improvement asse::sments. As you know, there is no free lunch any more and it has
occurred to me a number of times that EiietfeRTd$id?kestl"o�.eason . ?7
I discussed this matter with Commissioner Ahrens in 1981 when she
was the Chairman of the Legislative Committee and at that time and since then
other legislative priorities have prevented this matter from coming up.
cc: Richard Brubaeher, County Executive Director
Pete Schneider
Encls.
,9u.'ev«ln.Y.
oZJ �Gta='R^r�'.�lIRPnD'Kl/(/i24•dH�:
7 ]�,
e
DEPARTMENT OF
TAXATION AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION
COUNTY OF: RAMSEY
113.138 COURT HOUSE
ST. f AUL, MINNESOTA 55102
DIVISION
JOHN O.LEWINMANAGERS
WIN
.tune 17. 198)
Propertyveluelfon .
pAMSEYC0UNIY
WILLIAM M. KILLEEN
Revenue
LOU McKENNA
C.THOMAS OSTHOFF
Director
Records
EUGENE H. GIBBONS
ROGEn VIK
Property Ownership
ASSI. Director
ruclquuuuul•I
C
To: Intl NcKennn, Ilh•rclor
UopatLmuuL nl"Iaxnitun i ItRr•uld:; Adcdnistral.lan
i
From: Leonard F. Olson, AssueiaLe tanager �o
Revenue Division
Ln response LO the 1CL'L'er of .luoc 9, 1983 from 0u:1110 W. NcCnrty, Mayor, City
of I•luunds View concerning the a:ailabi.lfty of Special Assessment balance
information for the years ending 1981 and 1982 from the Department of Taxation
and Records Admiuistratiun, Ramsey Comity.
The Tax Accounting Section is responsible for the Special Assessment control
tr�
function which requires the position of a full time Account Clerk. w n`
� ttxeu ttit FdlsburPefi�ItC,v°eEn orma ion` tt. ' ' a 4 f G•; AT G
In August of 1981, there were eight (8) enipluyees assigned Lo tha Tax Accounting
Section, today there :uc four (k) c,,:playc..y WCIb one additional employee who
has been assigned Lu :uwther division working tumpurarily. This is a 50%
reduction in permanent personnel in less Lhan two years. 'Phis reduction occurred
because of a death, retirement, re -assignment and a promotion. None of the lost
personnel have been replaced as of Lhis dale.
er,l"Gvaaanc:vpsl.szruta.�.� - .� ,....,.._���+,e�.✓u-/ O
Until an additional employee can he assigned to this work, only Lhe essential
duties can be perfurnkd in Lhe Special Assessment control area.
LfO:el
DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION
COUNTY OF RAAISEY
126.138 Court Rouse
St. Paul, Minnesota 55102
LOU McKENNA
April 24, 197p
DIVISION MANAGERS:
Director
Rehu, J. Ellie
IIOGER VIK
M yrrls voluotion
Assistant Director
William M. Killeen
Revenue
C. Thom., Ouhall
Nemurnndum
Land Records
To: Lou McKenna, Director
Department of Property Taxatiun
From: Len Olson, Supervisor
fax Accounting Section
Re: Update on Nemo. dated Jan ry 6, 1978 (copy returned per your request)
relative to service charge fur collecting local improvement assessments.
1. Estimated Annual Costs Incurred in Collecting; local Improvement
Assessments
j Salaries (1981)
h%9J Q 3 Deputy 'Pax Clerks - (1007 of time) $53,097.00
0,,0� 1 Account Clerk I1 - (35% of time) 5,955.00
1j,1 Accountant II - (107 of time) 2,642.00
• Qr 1 C. n.n 7...� raY L
.rV ....r..r/-�•. ,ten v-.. tililu/ 1,750 .11V
Total Salaries $63,452.00
Equipment
$1,200.00 Total cost depreciated over 15 years 80.00
Supplies 100.00
Telephone S00.00
Printing 850.00
/A/ ',UUl Data. Processing. 7,099.00
Till'al FO-irnnl'nd Ali or...I /'....r.. $ll no, on
Less Estimated lntcres Earnings 24,000.00
Net Estimated Annual Costs $48,081.00
Lou McKenna
Page 2.
2. Methud of Charges Lu_Municipalltios
Amoral ch:u•ge Ln be b:taed on Lhc number of parcels per assessment
In carp municipality. The total m mibrr for suburban Ramsey municl-
pnlit.ies in 47,859, and I'nr Lhc City of tit. Paul 6,971.
Since the City of St. 111ml collects their own balnnces of assessments,
we will use the suburban total to divide for a per assessment cost:
$48,081.00 $1.01 per parcel.
47,859
3. Cost Allocation
Using $1.01 per parcel as the basis, $48,081.00 net cost would be
allocated as follows:
City or
Total Number of
Town
Active Parcels
Cost
Arden Hills
2,311
$2,334.11
Blaine
1
1.01
Falcon Heights
218
220.18
Cam Lake
13
13.13
Lauderdale
6
L.06
Little Canada
1,304
1,377.64
Maplewood
9,178
9,269.78
Mounds View
1,396
1,409.96
v New Brighton
2,555
2,580.55
North St. Paul
2,872
2,900.72
Roseville
9,597
9,692.97
St. Anthony
334
337.34
Si,oreview
6,171
6.234.73
Spring lake Park
33
33.33
Vadnais Heights
2,950
2,979.50
White Bear Lake
6,553
6,618.53
Town of White Bear
2,305
2,328.05
Total-
47,859
$48,337.59
i.PO: el
cc: William Killeen, Manager
Revenue Division
101
DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
126.130 CnuiI Iluusu
St. Paul, 6linnesotu 55102
LOU McKENNA January 6, 1978 DIVISION MANAGERS:
oireeror Wdl-am E. Cullen
Properry Vefusrion
ROGER VIK William M. Killeen
Assrsranl oiracrar Revenue
C. Thomat Oahoil
MrNORANDIN Lind Rseords
To: Lou McKenna, Director
Department of Properly Taxation
From: Len Olson, Supervisor o
Tax Accounting Section
Re: Update on Memo. dated October 11, 1977 (copy attached) relative
to service charge for collecting local improvement assessments.
�I
We have received a print-ouL from Da La Processing which slows Lite
total number of active parcels by assessment, by City or Town. The
total number for suburban Ramsey Cities and Town is 40,336, and for
Lilt City of St. Paul 11,459-
Since Lite City oC St. Paul presently cullecL's their own balances
of assessments, we will use the sul ""ball total to divide for a per
assessment cost:
45 862.00 _ $1.13699 ($1.14) per assessment
40,336
using $1.14 per assessment as the basis the following shows the way
the $45,862.00 would be allueated to Lite Cities and Town:
Total Number
City ur
of
Town
Active Parcels
Ccst
Arden Hills
2,020
$ 2,302.80
Falcon Heights
480
547.20
Gem Like
23
26.22
Lauderdale
1U
22.80 S
Little Canada
1,215
1,385.10 f■
Maplewood
5,788
6,598.32
I(0*1
Lou McKenna
City or
Total
Moundsview
New Brlghtun
North St. Paul
Roseville
St. Anthony
Shoreview
Spring Lake Park
vndnais llvight:c
White Bear I11(c
Town of White Bear
Total
IVAI
Too I NIIIIII)vr
of
Active Parcels
1,864
4,412
2,872
10,288
591
5,778
46
1,4t13
1,872
1,584
40,336
LPO:cI
cc: William Killeen, Manager
Revenue Division
Cost
2,1.24.96
5,029.66
3,274.08
11,728.32
673.74
6,586.92
52.44
1,690.62
2,134.08
1,805.76
$45,983.04
January 9, 1978
October 11, 1977
Tnl Iml Iicllanna, xrector
Dopartrwnl' of liar txt•y T.uatiuu
pram I.es, Olson, uporvinor
Tai: Accounting ;:uctl.on
µal liarvice charge for C,1lcctinU local Improveant Assessments
2. Annunl•Conts.incurre�, in CollectinLLocn1 Innrovc�_:gnt Assesslaents
'ialnric:; - (lit. 19'JS)
r 3 Deputy Tax Cicrkn - 00077 of time) $A� 147
528
1 Account Clerk II (35% of time)
1 Accounrn,rt TT rli% of tine;
1 Suporvinor (5% of time)
Total •alarie:, ;;49,052.GU
C<ui rwnt r30.00
;12clu.00 Total cost depreciated nvel• 15 years
50.00
Supplies "0.00
IV
l'cicuho°c 250.00
Prigting
Bata 1'rocessins ;650.00
Teleproce:;:;ing
,'rocesning of I;csolut:ionr, remelting
Lb4retf�b�naf aasesaaeuts, Payments, 450_00
Total Data Processing 1,100.00
1. 1, , i I I , 1977
(10
SI ett 11 forr.-I 1 4 1 1 rv". n :1 :,1. (.k: t, n r, on
c 1� jl� I L I,)' I it 111 t L 1. j).1 1 L t
GATEWAY
w I.n r
6
I
Cif 0f v0pjg !QW
yIIAMSEY COUNTY. MINNE50TA
7401 HIGHWAY 10
MOUNDS VIEW MINN $5117
78a7055
,June 3, 1983
Warren Schabe r, Chairman
Ramsey County Board of Commissioners
Court (louse
St. Panl, Minnesota 55102
Dear Mr. Schaher,
For the last two years the City's Director of 1••inance and repre-
rentatives of the City's auditing firm have reported that the
accounting records for special assessments of the Department of
Property Taxation were not complete and up to date for their use
in closing the financial records of the c:i.ty for 1981 and 1982.
City records and partial records of the Departmennces Of t
Property
s-
Taxation were used to generate 1'u1❑1 1'al'lcneratinc l final balances
melts for those years. That process Of g 1
on assessments has proven time consuming and costly to the City.
The balances of special assessments obtained in this manner may
l Staff time will be
or may not prove to be accuraWhen thee. lta�eafinally available from
expended obtaining balances, Y
the Department of Property Taxation, and reconciling City records
so as to agree with those balances.
As collection agent for Ramsey County municipalities, information
on special assessment balances should be available on a timely
basis. municipalities s1lOube availlabl.etto thelnatc final balances
on
sments
uld
I request that you investigate this matter and take steps to ensure
that in the future information on special assessments balances will
be available on a timely basis.
Sincerely,
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
Duane W. IdcCarty
Mayor
DWM/dS
RESOLUTION NO. 1633
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 1462
ESTABLISHING VARIOUS FEES AND CHARGES
WHEREAS, Resolution No. 1462, adopted on June 12, 1982,
established various fees and charges as provided for in the
Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, it is the desire of the City of Mounds View to
charge for the prevision of agendas and minutes to individuals
and organizations not directly related to the City, i.e., City
Council, Commissions, staff and representatives of the press.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE 1T RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Mounds View that the following annual charge be levied
for the expense of providing copies of City Council agendas
and/or minutes.
Agendas and Consent Agendas $40.00/year
Minutes $25.00/year
Adopted this 25th day of July, 1983.
ATTEST:
(SEAL)
11
Kayor
Clerk -Administrator
MEMO TO: ADMINISTRATOR AND COUCCIIr' \
FROM: MAYOR
DATE: JULY 12, 1983 \ j
RE: FEDERAL CABLE T.V. REGULATION
Please review the attached materials regarding Federal Cable
Telecommunication legislation. A comparision of our Cable T.V.
franchise (ordinance #319) and the essence of 5.66 (as presented
by Senators Durenberger and Boschwitz), indicates the potential
for serious erosion of local control in this matter.
I request that this subject be included for appropriate action
at the July 18, 1983 agenda session of the City Council.
RUDY BOSCHWITZ
MINNESOTA
'Zfnide$ 5(ale-o Zenaie
WASIIINOTON, D.C. 20510
June 30, 1983
Hon. Duane McCarty
Mayor of Mounds View
2401 Highway 10
St. Paul, Minnesota 55112
COMMIAGRICUTTEE
LTURE
BUDGET
FOREIGN RELATIONS
SMALL BUSINESS
VE IkNANS AFFAIRS
Dear Mayor McCarty:
I thought you might be interested in knowing the status of
the Cable Telecommunications Act (S. 6b).
The full Senate took up consideration of S. 66 on June
13
and 14 and approved it by a vote of 87-9. In my opinion,.ev
with the adopted amendments and the committee changes, the bill
his;inadequate. j believe it takes too much control away from the:
local, communities and transfers it to the federal government and';-
-, cable companies'. 'In keeping with my position as an advocate
of local control, I voted against.S. 66.
Several amendments were offered to S. 66. Two amendments
that I believe would have improved the bill were defeated. One
amendment would have disallowed an automatic, annual rate
increase by cable companies. The second amendment proposed
"grandfathering" into the bill all previous cable agreements.
Ir, spite of amendments I offered with Senators Lautenberg
(D-New Jersey), Exon (D-Nebraska), and Durenberger, we were not
able to produce a final bill that I could support. ,As it. pow!
stands, the local communities will have their authority abrogated
'Ehrough this legislation.
Senate bill 66 has been referred to ,the House fc.:
consideration. If you haven't done so already, I suggest you
rnntact your Representative and exprej, our concerns.
Thanks for your interest in this mytter.
Si
Rudy Boschwitz �
United States Senator
RB/mc
I[n O z1afez zeira{e
WASHING, ON. D.C. 20510
Dear Mayor:
10n June 14 the Senate gave its overwhelming approval to S. 66,
the Cable Telecommunications Act of 1983, by a vote of 87-9. As
one who voted for S. 66 as the best feasible program for local govern-
ments, I am happy to say that significant improvements were made to
the bill during its consideration on the Senate floor.
S. 66 gives the Federal Communications Commission exclusive
jurisdiction over cable telecommunications, preempting Stati-and
local authority to freely negotiate cable franchise agreements and
`regulate cable rates. The legislation is designed to create a
national policy framework for the development of this new medium
primarily by removing areas of uncertainty for would-be cable investors.
iThe;bill provides fora process of !franchise renewal: similar to that'
governing television broadcasters; and in the event renewal is not
granted, it requires that the operator be paid the fair market value
'of the system; S. 66 also deregulates cable services, a move intended
a ^ to allow cable operators to comnete. effectively with other tele-
communications media. In one of the more controversial aspects of
the bill, franchise authorities will be prohibited from specifying'
cable programming in franchise agreements.or, afterwards, regulating
its cost to consumers.
Rowever,. in another important respect ;tom; spec_Jj&ation o 1
'cable .fac' 'ties a:d equiy�gnt--;S;:;^66'allows State and local
ranchsing . authoritids_;t^ Continue their central role. tj eiF ight
�'to neqjtiate..s�c�atters i� the franchise press will i��ve: local
governments the power to deter ine the h sical nature an -go
n-
fiauration of cheir7cable systems. Tndee , to the extent that the
bill spurs interest in cable investment, local officials may find
greater latitude in negotiating the installation of systems, and
greater access to the cable capabilities essential to attracting
high-technology growth and development to their jurisdictions.
A number of mayors, in Minnesota and elsewhere, have expressed
concern over S. 66. Accordingly, I voted for the legislation only
after helping to secure several changes which, as your Senator and
as Chairman of the Subcommittee on Intergovernmental Relations, I
felt would significantly improve S. 66 from the perspective of
local governments. Along with.Rudy Boschwitz'and other concerned
Senators, I worked with Commerce Committee Chairman Bob Packwood to
bring about the following changes:
1 a� c� IE�C/IJ�7
�n
Page Two
o Enforcement. My amendment to section 613(d) deleted the
operator's right to unilaterally abrogate negotiated commit-
ments to provide specified facilities and equipment. An
operator will now have to prove that a "significant change
in circumstances" has made the provision of the facilities
and equipment impracticable before a local government is
required to negotiate over the change in the agreement.
The amendment will also mandate binding arbitration when
such negotiations fail, and will thus preserve the local
character of the disputes resolution process.
o Franchise Renewal. Two changes were made to section 609.
First, the provision prohibiting a franchise authority
from considering competing applications was dropped after
a number of us expressed concern over its anti-trust impli-
cations. And second, under one of several amendments
sponsored by Senator Lautenberg and supported by Senators
Boschwitz, Exon and myself, the requirement for judicial
de novo hearings on decisions to deny franchise renewal
will not apply where an operator has been given a hearing
consistent with accepted administrative procedures.
o Rate Regulation. The key change to section 607 involved
dropping the proposed 5 percent floor on the annual increase —
service rates. Under the amendment, rates may rise in
accordance with the annual increase in the regional Consumer
Price Index. Also, basic service rates would continue to be
regulated within the "B contour" if 80 percent of the house-
holds for which cable was available subscribed to the system.
7 Access. This amendment to section 614 will allow franchise
authorities to specify access to public and educational
programming as well as to government programming which already
was allowed under the bill.
Frankly, I doubt that these changes will satisfy everyone. I'm
not satisfied myself, but S. 66 still has a long way to go before
becoming law. First, it must be passed in the House of Representatives,
and then it mus£ go through conference conuaittee before coming back
to the Senate for final passage. By voting for this bill on the
Senate floor, I have helped to secure essential changes in the
legislation while retaining the good will. of Chairman Packwood and
others, keeping uw in a strony position to represent your concerns
in the days ahead.
Page Three
Again, I believe wo have made impo tint progress toward
improving S. 66, and intend to continue my efforts in this
regard. In the meantime, as alw elcome your thoughts
and comments. r i
Uni
DD:pha
ly,
u
UNITED STATES CONFERENCE OF MAYORS
1620 EYE STREET, NURT MUr
WASHINGTON, D.C. 2(X)06
TF.LENIONE: (202) 293-7330
June 10, 1983
The Honorable David Durenberger
United States Senate
375 Russell Senate Office Building
Washington, DC
Dear Senator Durenberger:
The U.S. Conference of Mayors is very pleased to strongly
support your proposed amendment to S. 66, the Cable Tele-
communications Act of 1983.
The "changed circumstances" provision of S. 66, which your
amendment would be addressed to, is a potential powder keg
of difficulty for the nation's cities in the cable television
area. Section 613(d), as originally drafted, would have
given the cable operator the right to unilaterally abro-
gate provisions of the franchise agreement. Your amend-
ment corrects that very basic flaw to a significant degree.
Although ,Conference policy oWoses feddgr-al cable legisla-'
�Qp, your eme5`5 went w"ill represent an important improvement
of S. 66.
Thank you for your assistance, We look forward to continuing
to work with you in this and other areas.
Sincerely,
John J. Gunther
Executive Director
-CV41L, O
r MEMO TO:
FROM:
Mayor and CiLy Council
Director of Public Works/Community Development
DATE: July 14, 1983
SUBJECT: PROBATION I)FR10D POIt '1'iM P19'TMAN
Mr. Pittman's 6 month probation period will end July 25, 1983.
During Mr. Pittman's probation period we have had a chance to fully
evaluate his varied talents as they relate to tl:e Public Works
Maintenance position.
Mr. Pittman is assigned primarily to the Sewer Department. We
have observed the he is more than capable to fulfill his duties
as assigned. in addition, Mr. Pittman has been invaluable in
assisting with the propane conversion and auto body work on new
and old vehicles which has resulted in considerable savings to the
City. Mr. Pittman has excellent mechanical skills.
Mr. Pittman has excellent work habits and will complete tasks
essigned in a timely and satisfactory fashion with minimal super-
vision.
Mr. Pittman has proven to be a definite asset to the Maintenance
Department work force.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council approve
Mr. Trim PiTttman as permanent full time employee for the City of
Mounds View. Mr. Pittman's salary shall be per the contract rates
in the Labor Agreement with I.U.O.E., Local No. 49.
JCJ/bc
14
C
MEMO 'ro: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Director of Public Works/Community Development
DATE": July 14, 1983
SUBJECT: STATUS ON NEW T.II. 10 CONSTRUCTION
Attached are the following items:
1. Letter dated March 15, 1983 to MnDOT Commissioner Braun.
2. Letter dated April 4, 1983 from MnDOT Commissioner Braun.
3. Draft letter to MnDOT Commissioner Braun.
I contacted Bill Crawford MnDOT District 5 Engineer on July 13, 1983
concerning New T.II. 10 project. Bill. told me the following:
1. Project has very high priority with Commissioner Braun.
2. Full Project ($22 million construction estimate) is on
current list of. "candidate" projects for 1984 through
1987.
C 3. MnDOT signed documents establishing center line location
in Spring of 1983.
4. Interim project for 2 lane segment from County Road J to
T.H. 65 is scheduled for bid opening November 22, 1985
(fiscal year 1986). Interim project is $1.0 million for
grading, paving and signing 2 lanes with no interchanges
5. Mr. Craig Robinson is project engineer assigned to
managn. the design work.
I will contact Mr. Robinson for data and detailed schedule for interim
project.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. Send attached letter to MnDOT Commissioner Braun.
2. Contact Ramsey County and solicit their support to speed
up process.
3. Contact the City of Blaine and solicit their support to
speed up process.
' JCJ/bc
Attachments
GATEWAY TO THE NORTH 1
J.�
M.irch'�1 193,
Cif of VOR S iQ�l
HHAMSEY COUNTY. MINNESOTA
2,101 HIGHWAY 10
NiOUNOS VIEW. MINN. 55112
fUb3055
Richard Braun, Commissioner
Minnesota Department of Transportation
Transportation Building
St. Paul, Minnesota 55155
Re: Construction of New Trunk Highway 10
from County Road J to Tunk Highway 65
Dear Commissioner Braun:
The City of Mounds View would like to solicit your assistance it
f resolving two major traffic concerns that exist within our City.
The two major areas of concern are:
1) The increasing traffic load being placed on existing
Trunk Highway ]0 as it passes diagonally through our
community; and
2) The traffic volume on County Road J which crosses on
the northern City limits of the community has increased
dramatically since the draft environmental impact study
prepared as part of the New 10 alignment evaluation.
These problems are creating some significant noise intrusion
problems especially along County Road J due to the significant
amount of truck traffic using this route to traverse between Trunk
Highway 65 and Interstate 35W. Bascd on our in-house estimates
and the noise values that were projected as a result of traffic
volumes during the draft Environmental Impact Study lead us to
conclude that the Pollution Control Agency noise criteria are
being exceeded in the County Road J area for residents in Mounds
View. your assistance in working towards a Zolution, which would
be the completion of Trunk Highway 10 from County Road J to
Highway 65, would be greatly appreciated. This would appear also
to provide significant relief for the traffic that is currently
traversing existing Highway 10 through Mounds View. According to
County traffic data, the volumes have exceeded in 1901, 30,000 to
33,000 vehicles per day. This creates significant problems at
intersections that are not signalized. This is becoming a safety
concern and, once again, we would appreciate any assistance you
can give us in resolving these problems.
Mr. Braun
Page 2
March 7, 1983
It is our understanding that recently the New 10 project from
County Road d uurLh Lo Trunk ILLghway LU has moved ahead in the
process. We undar::tand that. Hie right: of way map has been signed
which allows acquisition of key pieces of right of way for that
proposed project but that a funding source has not been officially
committed. We, therefore, wish to go on record requesting the
Commissioner of. Transportation to give the highest priority to
obtaining the necessary federal funding and stale matching monies
to complete New Highway 10 from County lioad J to Highway 65. The
City is very concerned that some provisions be made to complete
the connection of the New 10 alignment to the proposed 6 10 project
that is currently underway and includes a new bridge crossing the
Mississippi River. It is our understanding that this proposed
project will terminate on Trunk Highway 47 near the intersection
of University Avenue and existing Highway 10. Once again, we would
strongly suggest consideration be given to completing the link
between the terminus of 6 10 and the proposed terminus of Trunk
Highway 10 and Ilighway 65. This will complete a very vital link
within the transportation system in the northern suburbs and hope-
fully dramatically improve the traffic noise problems and safety
problems the citizens of ?founds View are experiencing. We look
forward to your reply as to when and how these projects will procee-.
Sincerely,
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
Duane W. McCarty
Mayor
/be
cc: Bill Crawford, District 5 Engineer
Ken Weltzin, Ramsey County Engineer
�y
T �tNNE50rq y
O
D Q
�'�tiT 01 iViPtty�O
� III, r oil I u111111P"bnlrl
hpril 4, 1983
III 11 Il'til Ili I
I)l'�)illlllh•III V1� ���f.11lti�11111i111(III
�� I'Illlti�)()I'lill11111 I it II�(�Il It
til. I'illl�. �II11111'�IIhI .i:ll�i.l
CITY Ci
11,0110rabie Ouane 14. McCarty
Mayor of Mounds View
f401 Highway 10
Mounds view, Minnesota 55112
°e: New TH 10
Dear Mayor McCarty:
Thank you for your letter of March 15, 1983 regardingnruc
ion of New is certainlyunk
Highway 10. Your interest and support in this proposed project
appreciated.
As you are aware, this project involves the construction of a four lane divided
highway between Co. Rd. J in Mounds View and TH 10/47 in Coon Rapids on a new
location approximately one mile north of existing TH 10. A Draft Environmental
hedcinSJunelloftthat sameuyear. iSinceearly
that7timef, the Location
was circlated the projecthaspublic
been1linrang
"hold" status due to our inability to identify a source of funding. At the
present time, this project still remains etive due to iits
iprojectedse high
ition
cost ($21 million) in a funding category for not whicfor he
willtchangennitile foreseeable ufuture nt of aisiimpossible tolable . say haththis er rthis
time,
d in your
However, as an interim ly pglconstructionoof attwoelane roadwaytwhiclr
will
has now officially programmed
will connect Co. Rd. J and TH 65. This new roadway will be constructed on the
same location as the future ' New TH 10." This project is currently scheduled
for a November 1985 contractletting. Although this two lane connection is not
the ultimate solution, it will definitely relieve some of the traffic pressure
on Co. Rd. J and existing TH 10. A geometric layout for this project is
currently being prepared and our District 5 office will be contacting the city
in the near future to discuss the proposal.
I want to thank you for your interest and if I can be of further assistance,
please let me know.
Sincerely,
Richard P. Braun
Commissioner
All 1•:yual Op1wrionify li"Iplayrr
r�
N 1 t A I' T
cif of VON s W
RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA
2401 IIIGIIWAY 10
MOUNDS VIEW, MINN 55112
7H4A060
July 14, 1983
Richard Braun, Commissionor
Minnesota Department of
Transportation
St. Paul, MN 55155
Re: Construction of New T.H. 10 from County Road J
(85th Avenue) to 11.11. 65
Dear Commissioner Braun:
Thank you for your letter dated April 4, 1983 concerning the
status on New T.H. 10. The City has continued to receive com-
plaints concerning traffic safety and noise along County Road
J. I would like to inquire on behalf of the City wether the
City can assist in expediting progress on the interim New T.H. 10
solution scheduled for November, 1985 contract letting.
Your guidance in this matter will be gr-atly appreciated.
Sincerely,
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
Duane W. McCarty
Mayor
/bc
cc: Bill Crawford, District Engineer
Ken We.ltzin, Ramsey County Engineer
r
MEMO TO: Mayor and City COnneJ.l.
Wetlands Commil:tcc
I'ROM: Director of Public Works/COumwniLy DcveJ.opmcnL
DATE: July 14, 1983
SUBJECT: COORDINATION W"J"I RICE CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT
CONCERNING WEI-LAND ORDINANCE AND COMPREHENSIVE
STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
On July 12, 1983, I attended a forum at Met Council concerning the
Surface Water Management Act (Chapter 509, Levy Bill). Attached
are Lhc hand outs from that meeting.
The focus of the meeting was to discuss requirements of the Levi
Bill. The most important factor _s for cities to determine when and
how involved they will become in plan preparation process. The
Statute allows levying a tax to fund plan preparation, and eventually,
capital improvements and maintenance. It was also pointed out that
the 1983 legislative authorized local units of government to create a
storm sewer utility like currently exists for sanitary sewer and water
systems.
I was contacted on July 8, 1983 District concerning by Steve Miller of Rice Creek Watershed
what the City was willing
Poppelaars drainage permit. Mr. Miller wondered
tentativelng to do to resolve current impasse. I have
y set up a meeting with Mr. WJodenbacher of Rice Creek Water-
shed Disrict to discuss these issues.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff requests direction from the Council concerning:
1) Role the City desires to play in Rice Creek Watershed
District Surface Water Management Plan preparation.
2) Role the City will play to resolve impasse with Rice
Creek Watershed District permit for 'Pony Poppelaars.
JCJ/bc
Attachments
MET ROPOLITANCOUNCIL
300 Metro Square Building, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101
tJune 23, 1983
MEMORANDUM
TO: City and County Staff Planners, Engineers and Planning Consultants
FROM: James Uttley, Local Planning Assistance
SUBJECT: July 12 PLANNERS' FORUM on Surface Water Management Act
Our next PLANNERS' FORUM, scheduled for July 12 in the Chambers of the
Metropolitan Council, will focus on the Surface Water Management Act. The
..,11 U....,., ,r o,nn a.m.
forumnua .rep-.. at
Speakers for this forum will include:
o Marcel Jouseau, Manager of the Council's Natural Resources Program, who
will focus on the Council"s role with respect to the act and what kinds of
help we can provide to local units of government.
o Mel Sinn, Acting Executive Director, Water Resources Board, who will focus
on the role of the Water Resources Board and the implications of the Board
to� local governments.
�11FV p'IL�U.rgF..0
o Q Halk of Popham, Haik, Schnobrich, Kaufman A Doty Ltd., an attorney for
several watersheds who will focus on the legal side of watersheds vs.
joint powers agreemepts
o Charles Honchell, Public Works Director for the City of Roseville, who will
focus on the nonlegal pros and cons of watershed districts vs. joint
powers agreements
Please MARK YOUR CALENDAR TODAY and plan to attend the July 12 forum.
13
September
November 15
January 17
JPU:im
FUTURE FORUMS
(tentative)
9.3 0
New Population Forecasts - Implications for Local Governments
Local Implications of the State/Council Economic
Development Mission
Corporate Planning: What are They Looking for
4
NOTES FOR THE JULY 12 PLANNERS' FORUM ON SURFACE WATER 14ANAGEMENT
Marcel Jouscau, Metropolitan Council
ROLE OF THE COUNCIL IN THE AMENDED ACT
o First, to provide a time extention, where warranted, for the formation
of Watershed Management Organization.
Council will need to determine that substantial progress is being made.
Will likely devise an internal review process in order to make the
determination of progress. "robably will include some time for comments
from local governments in the development of this process. (This will
not be anything like rules but rather informal guidelines, which could
be completed by early November.)
o Second, to review watershed plans.
Two levels of review are required, like under the Land Planning Act.
The Council will determine the conformance of the plan with Council
policies (advisory comments). The Council is also direced to review the
plans for impacts on Metro Systems and any changes required in the local
comprehensive plans.
AVAILABLE ASSISTANCE FROM COUNCIL
o Planner's Guide to the Watershed Plan: Council to complete this report
by early November 1983.
o Runoff and Water Quality Data: Council to provide data on runoff
volume, runoff quality and lake water quality for various but limited
number of areas. Contact for Runoff: Gary Oberts at 291-646 . Contact
for Lake Water Quality: Dick Osgood at 2 -
o Planning Assistance Report: Council to complete this report by October
1, 1983• To provide graphic models relating to water quality. Also, to
contain information on Management practices to deal with runoff volume
and quality.
o Seminars one on runoff an one on lakes. To be held during the first
quarter of 1984.
o Staff time will be available to answer questions from local governments
or watershed organizations. Contacts: Marcel Jouseau at 291-6402, Dick
Osgood and Gary Oberts.
JH1063-PHENV2
7))z/4,-ti IlAwplir
,eom GNNcie )1,0AWHhc.L-
W
November 10, 1902, page 2
WATERSHEDS
I. What are the boundaries desired?
2. Should the watershed be initiated at this time, or should
the parties wait for December 31, 1903 and have Ramsey
County request them i.n the manner they deem most appro-
priate?
JOINT POWERS
1. What boundaries are desired?
2. What should be the primary thrust of the water and manage-
ment organization?
a) Basic coordination of parties to meet legal WP10 require-
ments.
b) Provide over -view authority to ensure parties meet legal
f,940 requirements and follow ultimate plan implementation.
c) Provide staff to assist parties in developing and imple-
menting overall plan and local plan.
d) Provide staff as in (see c) above) plus monitor flows,
monitor qualities, predict problems and undertake projects
that cross municipal boundaries.
e) Provide an overseer authority to process permits and ensure
compliance with local and overall management plans.
f) A combination of portions of the above.
3. How should staff be provided.to develop the WMO?
a) Have staff from one or more cities do the work.
b) Hire a consultant.
4. How should funding be provided to develop the WMO?
5. How should staff requirements be met to operate the WMO?
a) Use existing city employees from one or more communities.
b) Hire additional city employees and assign them to the WMO,
(at least partially).
c) Use individuals already having contracts with the community.
i (Consulting engineers, attorney, inspectors, etc.)
d) [lire consultant firm to supply staff as required.
e) Hire employees to work for the WMO.
6. What time table should be followed to initiate the WMO?
November 10, 1982, page 3
As can be seen from the above, particularly in regard to a joint -
powers organization, there are numerous areas that need to be
agreed upon. Please give careful thought to these aspects prior to
coming to the meeting so that, hopefully, they can be resolved at
that time.
If you have any questions, please contact me as soon as possible.
Yours truly,
Charles V. Honchell, P.E.
Public Works Director
CVH/c
encl;
ASPECTS OF
CONSIDERATION
(4) Existence of an
additional
government
organization
(5) Development
of objectives.
(6) Development
of
management
plan.
WATER SHEDS
ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES
a) Provides an outside
organization to make
the decisions that are
politically difficult
for local govt agencies
a) may provide a forum
for future inllroved
agency interaction.
c) Relieve existing
agency wuLkl' '..-
a) Concentrates on water
6 environment related
items.
b) Diversity of board
nnmbership may lead
to broader perspective
of the problems 6
objectives.
a) Better able to make
politically difficult
decisions on what to
do and when.
a) Pore duplication
of effort, cost,
overlapping of
authority, land use,
etc.
b) Poore time delays
for developrent.
c) Removes responsi-
bility further fran
tho nnhl il`
c.'___
a) Less knodledge of
the details of
local problem.
b) Les,, likely to un-
derstand potential
inpct on local
agencies.
a) Potential to make
rajor plan deci-
sions which would
be incurpatible
with local perspec
tives.
b) Requires more co-
ordination effort.
c) potential for
overly techideal
6 expensive solu-
tions.
0
JOINT POWERS
ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES
a) Positive agency
interaction which
sets the ground
work for continued
good interaction
in the future.
a) Local agencies wil
have a better know
ledge of the local
problems.
b) More likely to de-
termine impacts on
local agencies.
a) May be able to use
existing staff for
savings.
b) As a party involves
will evalue a plan
more likely to
dovetail with local
plans.
c) Approach could be
less restrictive of
rule oriented.
a) Pay be somewhat of a
duplication of effort,
cost, overlapping of
authority, land use,
etc.
b) %,ore time delays for
developers.
a) Pay not be broad enouy,i
in perspective in regard
to water ranagement
issues.
b) may concentrate on small
local problems & over-
look larger regional
issues.
a) may not address in a full
enough manner the poli-
tically difficult aspects.
b) Potential conflict in
selecting engineer, at-
torney, clerical, etc.,
because of current in-
volvements.
c) Consensus in selling
priorities will be diffi-
cult.
ASPECTS OF
CONSIDERATION
WATER SHEDS
ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES
(12) Authority
a) Can order in needed
a) A major project in -
Level.
major projects that
volving several
are not agreed upon.
gout agencies can
be ordered in by a
single petition
from one agency.
(13) Enforrement
a) In a better position
a) Since they won't
of
to effect uniform
control land use
management
compliance.
they will be some -
approach.
b) may have to hire
the enforcement
s;ghattaff.
(14) Ability to un-
a) Better able to make
dertake pro-
the large project
jects involy-
decisions that are
ing _e�,eral
politically sensitive.
,agencies.
(15) Ease of
a) Simple process by
formation
County and State
of fM
rater Resources Baird.
JOINT POWERS
ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES
a) Authority is distri a) A need undertaking
buted in an agreed serving a minority
upon manner I could be stopped.
a) As a party to the
plan formation the
local agencies will
he mnre likely to
enforce strongly.
b) Local staff is more
likely to utilize
in enforcement.
c) Membership also
controls land use.
a) More difficult to
police its members.
a) May tend to fragment
the membership, because
of funding disputes,
resulting in nothing
being done.
a) All'agencies must agree
on all items which are
potentially complicated
and difficult to resolve.
ASPECTS OF
CONSIDERATION
(16) Probable
knowledge of
conditions
& problems.
(17) Financing of
plan develop-
ment. '
(18) Financing of
operational
costs.
WATER SHEDS
ADVANTAGES
a) TL-chnical advisors may
be much more experienc
ed in water -related
matters.
a) Have ability to spread
an administrative mill
levy over entire area.
b) Less likely to cut
corners on development
costs.
a) Have ability to spread
an administrative mill
levy over entire area.
b) There is a limit of
$125,000 that may be
levied.
DISADVANTAGES
a) May take some time
for members to
develop knowledge
of local problems.
a) May be more costly.
a) May be more costly.
b) Limited funding
available.
JOINT POWERS
ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES
a) More likely to
know local situa-
tion.
a) More funding op-
tions.
b) May be less expen-
sive due to use of
existing city staff
and expertise.
a) more funding op-
tions.
b) may be less expen-
sive due to using
existing staff.
c) Ability to obtain
needed funds with-
out constraining
limits.
e) Would have to establish
a special district to
levy or provide funds
from existing sources
which have competition
from other needs.
b) An agreement on tech-
nique for funding and
who sh ould pay how
much is needed.
a) See 16a
b) See 16b
c) Operation costs could
grow to very high
levels.
PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL.
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA
Regular Meeting
fMggY-nm,n,. July 11, 1983
.t <y
, Mounds View Cit Hall
2401 Hwy. 10, Mounds View, MN55112
The Mounds View City Council was called to order by 1. Call to Order
Mayor McCarty at 7:32 PM on July 11, 1983,
MEMBERS PRESENT; Councilmembers Blanchard, Doty, 2. Roll Call
an ner, Lin a and Mayor McCarty.
ALSO PRESENT: City Attorney Meyers, Clerk/
Administrator Pauley and Public Works/Community
Development Director Johnson.
Motion/Second: Doty/Linke to approve the June '17, 3. Approval of
I-9TTminutes as corrected. Minutes:
June 27, 1983
5 ayes 0 nays
Motion Carrie
Victor Loeffler, 5135 Greenwood Drive, stated he has 4. Residents Re -
two lots up for sale at 81st and Laport, and he has quests and
just found out they are part of the wetland Comments ftom
area. and asked what their status was, the Floor
Director Johnson explained that he had spoken with
Mr. and Mrs. Loeffler, and had explained the procedure
for obtaining a building permit, and getting a wetland
alteration permit. He also explained the problem
with the two lots, stating that the street is also
within the wetland, and the two lots are controlled
by both the flood plain and wetlands ordinances.
Attorney Meyers stated that Mr. Loeffler would have
to go through the process of applying for a permit,
and that there are several ordinances that regulate
the use of this land. He also advised that if a
permit cannot be issued, there is no provision for
reimbursement by the City.
Mr. Loeffler expressed his concern with finding a
buyer who may sue later, if he finds the lots are
not buildable. Attorney Meyers advised that Mr.
Loeffler not surpress any information about the lots
to prospective buyers.
Carol Seidenkranz, Student Services Coordinator for
the Mounds View Public Schools, stated that she has
p y�i July 11, 1983
„ ;
Mounds View City Council 1?, { ,
0
Regular Meeting U �'+�'I p i L) u! L Page Two
--------------------------------- ---------------
applied for two grants, and has just been informed
that she needs an official government sponsor. She '
explained the purpose of the two grants and stated
that she does have a letter of endorsement from the
Youth Service Bureau, which she knows the City works
with. Ms. Seidenkranz emphasized that she does not
need any money from the City, just their sponsorship.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley advised that the school
district will take care of all the details, financial
records, and so forth, and the City's only obligation
would be to be the official sponsor. Ms. Seidenkranz
added that the City's responsibility would be to give
it's endorsement, and then, if the grants were forth-
coming, the City would receive the checks and turn
them over to the school district. She provided the
Council with copies of the grant applications, for
their review.
Counci.lmember Hankner stated that she has worked with
Ms. Seidenkranz, and feels she does an excellent job.
She stated that she would have no problem in sponsoring
the grant application.
Mayor Mc(larty expressed concern with not knowing if any
funding would be available after the year was up, to
continue any programs that were started, and to continue
the salary of the two assistants who are to be hired.
Councilmember Hankner replied that that is always the
case with federal grants, that there is no guarantee
they will be continued.
As. Seidenkranz explained that none of the proposed
programs are new, and the assistants would help her
carry-ta:e+:r out.- existing programs.
Mayor McCarty questioned if the Youth Service Bureau
would step in at the end of the year, if further
funding was not available. Ms. Seidenkranz replied
that her job is short term, in that she provides
crisiE interventbon counseling, and refers anyone
on to the Youth Service Bureau who needs further
help.
Motion/Second: McCarty/flankner to approve the City
of Mounds View as the sponsoring government unit for
the rant applications from the State of Minnesota,
for 000 and $33,000, naming Carol Seidenkranz as
the contact person at the Edgewood Community
Center.
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carded
Mayor McCarty closed the regular meeting and opened 5. Public Hearing
the. public hearing at 7:57 PM, Ord. No, 344
U
Mounds View City y Jul Cotmcil,
Regular Meeting i y11 1983
-------- _
' •' Page Three
Clerk/Administrator Pauley gave a brief explanation
of Ordinance No. 344,
Attorney Meyers reviewed the request the City had
received for additional operating hours and reviewed
the requirements of the ordinance.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley explained that Donatelle's
made the application, which, if approved, would grant
all licensed liquor establishments in the City the
additional hours. He explained that an amendment
was made during the 1982 legislative session, allowing
two additional hours on Sunday.
Mayor McCarty closed the public hearing and reopened
the regular meeting at 8:01 PM.
Mayor McCarty asked that Item C be removed. 6. Approval of
Cleric/Administrator Pauley asked that a statement Consent Agend
from John Johnson, in the amount of $1,563.75, be
added to Item H.
Motion/Second: McCarty/Doty to add the statement
TOT71,563.75from John Johnson.
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carrie
Mction/Second: McCarty/Linke to approve the consent
agen a, minus Item C, and waive the reading of the
resolutions.
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carrie
Carol Crowi, 8330 Pleasantview Drive, stated that
regarding Item C, she and her husband are in opposition
of the installation of a street light. She explained
that while there was a robbery in the neighborhood,
none of the neighbors leave lights on when they are out,
and the lots are extra deep, which provides a rear
entrance to the homes. She stated that five homes on
the block are up for Bale, and she does not want her
taxes raised again by paying for the power for another
street light. She added that she already has the phone
box and electrical box and fire hydrant in her yard
and does not want a light pole added. She stated also,
that if it is put in across the street, it will bother
her family for sleeping.
Councilmember Doty explained that the City has n budget
each year for the installation of street lights. He
stated they must keep in mind the health, safety and
welfare of the neighborhood, and that a significant
number of residents had petitioned for that light.
Councilmember Hankner explained that in response to
g g ---
s V Mew City Coun i ii ``LL H Jul il, 1983
MoundYl lllrr� - }-------------Page Pour----
--------- ------ -
Mrs. Crowl's comments on tax increases, the major
increase for the past year was for the schools.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley informed the Council of
the possible locations for the pole,
Motion/Second: Doty/Hankner to approve Resolution
No, 1630, and change the address of the location
from 8320 to 8325 and from 8330 to 8335, and waive
the reading of the resolution.
5 ayes 0 nays
Mayor McCarty asked to return to the Residents Re-
quests portion of the agenda.
Jim Petrowski, 2708 County Road J, asked the status
of new Highway 10, as he has a considerable noise
problem on County Road J, and is having trouble
selling his home because of it. He added that he
had seen a news report on television, prioritizing
highway projects, and County Road J was not listed.
Director Johnson explained that earlier in the Spring,
District 5 of the Highway Department authorized and
signed the right of way documents to authorize the
acquisition of the necessary pieces of land. Ile
stated that further details are still being worked
out. He added that the City has informed the
Highway Department that this is a priority item for
the City, and they responded that it will be
prioritized in the Pall.
Councilmember Linke stated he has personally called
District 5 to put pressure on. Mayor McCarty added
that the City will write to MnDOT, voicing their
concern, and asking them to contact Mr. Petrowski
directly with a response.
Director Joh::son stated he would call and get a
current update for Mr. Petrowski on priority status.
Motion Carried
4. Residents Re-
quests (Cont,)
Motion/Second: Blanchard/Linke to approve the first 7. 1st Reading of
reading 7 Ordinance No. 344, an ordinance amending Ord. No. 344
the Municipal Code of Mounds View by amending Chapter
100, entitled "Intoxicating Liquors", and waive the
reading.
4 ayes 1 nay Motion Carried
Councilmember Doty stated he had voted against the motion as he feels enough liquor is sold all week ,J
long.
Mounds View City Council UT. ,. ;:" t p July 11, 1983
Regular Meeting r, y t Page Five
-----------------------------s-- -= --------- ----------------
Mayor McCarty explained that he had contacted clergy-
men within the City, and their opinion was that it
was an individuals responsibility, .and they did not
specifically object to the additional hours.
Councilmember Blanchard stated that she was in favor
of the additional hours, to allow the City businesses
to compete with surrounding communities.
Motion/Second: McCarty/Hankner to set a public hear-
ing for 7:40 PM on July 25 to consider the vacation
of the alley in Block 1, Iron Works Plat.
5 ayes 0 nays
Clerk/Administrator Pauley explained that Acting
Police Chief Smith was called out of town on
family business, and would be giving his report
on July 25.
Finance Director Brager reported the financial
statement had been completed, and the City has
taken advantage of some interest -bearing checking
accounts, and have worked on taking insurance
proposals and awarding insurance contracts, and
have started the first round in the budget, which
will carry through to the naxt quarter, and are
doing a special assessment debt study.
Finance Director Brager reported that for the
insurance program, they are going to have a firm
come in and look at the City's program and make
recommendations on modifications, with safety in
mind, which will reduce insurance costs. He
stated a report will be ready in about four weeks.
Finance Director Brager reported that a resident
had come in this morning and made a presentation
of money that was to be used for a special purpose,
drapes for the Clerk/Administrator's office. He
stated that a special fund had been set up, entitled
"RIPOFF". Mayor McCarty explained the money had
been donated at the City Dinner, in jest.
Park Director Anderson reported the 2nd quarter
had been their busiest, with Staff attending 42
evening meetings, and developing two City news-
letters, and spending a minimum of 30 hours a
week on the new.word processor/micro computer.
He reported that in forestry, 24 crates of flowers
Consideration
of Staff Memo
Regarding Blo
1, Iron Works
Plat, Alley
Vacation
Motion Carrie
9. 2nd Quarter
Department He.
Reports
Mounds View City Council
i, •..,
UNPI,
,,;;
E
July
Page
11, 1983
Six
Regular Meeting
--------------------------
f�
p `Q
tit
planted, along with 950 trees, with 75 trees
being designated as diseased.
Park Director Anderson reported interviews have been '
proceeding for the part time aquatics instructor. Ile
also reported that a grant had been received for
Silver View Park, for $33,228, to do additional
landscaping, and that he hopes to be able to modify
it to do trail development.
Park Director Anderson reported a great deal of time
had gone into the Festival in the Park, which they
felt turned out great.
He reported there are currently 120 employees working
in the Park, Recreation and Forestry department,
including volunteers, and he has been very busy coor-
dinating all of them, He started he would like to
commend Mary Saarion for all her extra time put in,
as well as the whole staff in general.
Director Johnson reported that Staff is attempting to
pull together information for the Council on a golf
course.
Ile reported that 113 building permits were issued, 32
mechanical permits, 17 HRA inspections, 72 housing
unit inspections, 72 re -inspections, and 16 planning
applications were received, with revenue from the
building permits alone being alveady at 100% of what
was expected for the year, and the other areas being
at at least 50%.
He reported that Knollwood Green and the 8-unit condo-
miniums that Mary Anderson is building, will be part
of the Parade of Homes in August.
Director Johnson reported that Well #6, Treatment
Plant #3 and Treatment Plant #1 work has all been
completed. He reported the sewer department has
reviewed the footage and determined some repair work
is needed, with two emergency repairs already having
been done.
Director Johnson reported the street sweeping was
completed, and that 5 tons of tar have been put
into potholes. He reviewed the LP conversion
status, and the training which has been completed
by employees, and the personnel hired.
Director Johnson reporteL'. that the water fund for
materials and supplies, will have an anticipated
overrun of approximately $3,000, with the original
budget being $5,934.
Director Johnson reviewed the hours completed to
date by himself, and the pro4,,rts involved,
• Mounds View City Council �1 u i July 11, 1983
Regular Meeting �i.',". C l Page Seven
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Councilmember Linke questioned who did the work on
Long Lake Road at Ardan Avenue. Clerk/Administrator
Pauley replied that the County did, and that he will
be writing a letter to them, informing them of the
poor quality.
Motion/Second: McCarty/Hankner to table the item
for further information and communication with
Mr. Johnson at the next agenda session.
5 ayes 0 nays
Mayor McCarty stated that he felt they must define
the special projects before any action is taken. He
also advised Director Johnson to hold off on those
projects until they are discussed further.
Councilmember Linke questioned whether restrictions
could be put on the garage door size and style, and
stated he woula prefer a double, swinging door.
Councilmember Hankner stated she had no problem with
the type of door, as the width and height are the same
Councilmember Blanchard
has recommended that no
building.
reported the Planning Commission
driveway be allowed to the
The Council reviewed Resolution No. 1617 and dis-
cussed enforcement of it, and whether the Conditional
Use Permit should be carried on to subsequent owners.
Motion/Second: McCarty/Hankner to approve Resolution
too. T6IT,—a-nT strike the fifth "Whereas", and waive
the reading.
5 ayes 0 nays
Motion/Second: Linke/Blanchard to amend the previous
motion to add "Be it further resolved that no improved
driveway will be allowed".
5 ayes 0 nays
Clerk/Administrator Pauley explained why this item
was on the regular age:.da, rather than the consent
agenda.
Director Johnson advised the Council that temporary
building permits have been issued for the foundation
only, and the ordinance allows him up to 60 days to
10. Consideration
of Amendment
Contract for
Professional
Services with
John Johnson
Motion Carrie
11. Consideration
of Staff Memo
Regarding Wil
Harp CUP Re-
quest and
Rslt. No. 161
Motion Carrie
Motion Carrie
12. Consideration
of Staff Memo
Regarding Fra.
Vogt Minor
Subdivision a:
Rslt. No. 1621
Mounds View City Council vp5G`+ } July 11, 1983
Regular Meeting U 6 L Page Eight
---------------------------------------------------- 0------------------
complete the work.
Motion/Second: Blanchard/Doty to approve the minor
subdivision for Prank Vogt and approve Resolution
No. 1628 and waive the reading.
5 ayes 0 nays
Motion/Second: McCarty/Linkc to authorize Staff to
mow the property located at 5511 Quincy Street and
submit a bill to the owner for labor and material
costs and if the bill is not paid at the time taxes
are certified, the amount is to be levied on the
property taxes.
5 ayes 0 nays
Director Johnson had no report.
Attorney Meyers had no report.
Motion Carrie
13. Consideration
of Staff Memo
Regarding a
Public Nuisanc
at 5511 Quincy
Street
Motion Carried
14. Report of
Director of
Public Works/
Community Dvlp
15. Report of
Attorney(•`
Councilmember Blanchard reported she had received 16. Reports of
very firm input from all the Planning Commissioners, Councilmembers
that they would like to continue receiving both
Council minutes and agendas.
Councilmember Doty reported that he had been approached
by a resident who has a problem with two cats belonging
to a neighbor, in which the cats have the run of the
neighborhood and use his children's sandbox. He
stated the resident had talked to the Police Department,
but there is no ordinance regulating cats.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported that in looking
at the Code, the cats could not be described as wild,
and that two animals are allowed per household to be
kept or raised. He recommended that the resident
contact him, and they could have the CSO go over and
talk to him. He stated they could also contact the
Ramsey County Health Department.
Councilmember Blanchard reported the Planning
Commission is concerned with the delay in adopting
Chapter 40, as they are having a problem with
enforcement since it is in limbo.
Director Johnson replied that he and Attorney Meyers
have been working on coordinating the text and maps,
� , �"••"- `-' "�''•� r
Mounds View City Council a ,+ July 11, 1983
Regular Meeting �; Page Nine
Reg g , r , - -----------------
---------------------------------------------
and it is a lower priority than other items.
Councilmember Doty stated he would like to have
the idea of a golf course examined. Clerk/Admini-
strator Pauley replied that it has been discussed
and Staff must look at the size factor and financial
feasibility of it.
Councilmember Blanchard stated that Bob Glazer had
done an extensive study at one time, and they should
check to see if his records are available.
Councilmember klankner stated she would like to thank
all who were involved with the Festival in the Park,
with a special thanks going to Jan Quick. Clerk/
Administrator Pauley replied that a letter of
appreciation will be sent.
Mayor McCarty stated he had spoken with Jan Quick
and the Festivities Commission would like to have
the Festival critiqued as soon as possible. He
asked Clerk/Administrator Pauley to set up a joint
meeting with the Council and Festivities Commission,
for July 19.
Councilmember Linke reported he had sat in on some
of the interviews for Police Chief, and he feels there
is a good group of applicants.
He reminded the Council of the Ramsey County League
meeting on July 20, which is a picnic and tour, with
reservations due by July 15.
Mayor McCarty reported that on July 9 at 8:15 AM, he
was buzzed by a T33 jet with Air Force markings, and
stated he would like an inquiry made as to why their
aircraft was performing, using Runway 17 with no wind.
Mayor McCarty stated the sense of urgency for setting
goals and policies is increasing, and recommended
setting up a meeting to discuss it, as soon as possible.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley replied that the best time
to do it was right after the goal setting workshop
on August 31 and September 1.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported there is now 17. Report of
Administrator
$42.73 in the drapery fund.
Motion/Second: Doty/Linke to adjourn at 9:33 PM. 18. Adjournment
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Respectfully submitted,
Donald F. Pauley
Clerk/Administrator
DATE APPROVED: 7/11/83
PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MOUNDS VIE14
RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA
Regular Meeting
June 27, 1983
Mounds View City Hall
2401 Hwy. 10, Mounds View, MN 55112
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Mounds View City Council was called to order by 1. Call. to Order
Mayor McCarty at 7:30 PM on June 27, 1983.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Councilmembers Hankner, Blanchard, 2. Roll Call
Doty, Linke and Mayor McCarty.
ALSO PRESENT: City Attorney Meyers, Clerk/
Administrator Pauley and Public Works/Community
Development Director Johnson.
Motion/Second: Hankner/Linke to approve the June 13, 3. Approval of
1797 minutes as corrected. Minutes:
June 13, 1983
4 ayes 0 nays 1 abstain
Motion Carrie
Councilmember Doty abstained from the vote as he had
not been present at the June 13 meeting.
Mayor McCarty closed the regular meeting and opened 4. Public Hearin.
the public hearing at 7:40 PM. 1984 Revenue
Sharing Propo:
Finance Director Brager explained that the hearing Use Hearing
is held prior to the Council considering any items
in the 1984 budget, and the purpose of it is to
obtain suggestions from the citizens on possible
uses for revenue sharing funds. He stated the
suggestions would be taken into consideration by
Staff in preparing the budget.
Councilmember Blanchard stated she had received phone
calls from citizens asking that the City parks be
included in the revenue sharing, for the repair and
update of the present equipment.
There were no comments from citizens present.
Mayor McCarty closed the public hearing and reopened
the regular meeting nt 7:42 PM.
There were no residents requests or comments from 5. Residents Re -
the floor. quests and
Comments from
the Floor
Mounds View City Council
June 27, 1083
Regular Meeting ---------- - ---Page
---------------------------------------
Two
---------
Mayor McCarty asked that items E and F be removed
6. Approval of
for discussion.
Consent 49-nda
Motion/Second: Hankner/Blanchard to approve the
consent agenda, minus Items E and F, and waive the
reading of the resolutions.
5 ayes 0 nays
Motion Carried
Clerk/Administrator Pauley explained that Norb
Yenish was present, and had met with Staff earlier
in the day and expressed a desire to address the
Council regarding Item 3 on Appendix 2A of his
development agreement, concerning sprinklers.
Mr. Yenish explained that the sprinklers were not
required when he first checked the City code, and
this requirement will totally change his plans
for his hotel development.
Motion/Second: McCarty/Doty to table the project
until such time as the developer has provided the
City with all the required information.
5 ayes 0 nays
Motion Carried
Mayor McCarty explained the City does not have the
/
final plat yet from Mr. Yenish, and he is not willing
to approve something he has not seen.
Mr. Yenish's engineer explained that there was a
misunderstanding in talking to Staff, as it is just
a matter of showing the property line being moved.
Director Johnson stated that after the second reading
of proposed Ordinance No. 342, it would be another 40
days or so before the code would take effect, and
asked if the Council intends to require sprinklers
for this particular building.
Mayor McCarty replied that they should be required in the
Development Agreement, as the Council is responsible for
the public health, safety, and welfare.
Motion/Second: Doty/Linke to have the second reading 7. 2nd Reading an
an a option of Ordinance No. 342, an ordinance Adoption of
amending Chapter 63.05 of the Municipal Code of the Ord. No. 342,
City of Mounds View entitled, "Fire Code", and waive Amending
05Chap
the reading of the ordinance. ter
of
the Municipal.
Councilmember Hankner - aye Code
Councilmember Blanchard - aye
Councilmember Doty - aye
Councilmember Linke - aye
Mayor McCarty - aye Motion Carried
Mounds View City Council 1 , 983
Regular Meeting June Page Three2727
-------------------------------------------------
---------------------
Motion/Second: Doty/Blanchard to approve the 8. 2nd Reading a
second reading and adoption of Ordinance No. 343, Adoption of
amending the municipal code of the City of Mounds Ord. No. 343
View by amending Chapter 60, "Building Code and Amending the
License Fees", Chapter 61, "Plumbing Code", Chapter Municipal Cod
62, Electrical Code", and Chapter 63, "Fire Code",
and waive the reading of the ordinance.
Councilmember Hankner - aye
Councilmember Blanchard - aye
Councilmember Doty - aye
Councilmember Linke - aye
Mayor McCarty - aye Motion Carrie
Motion/Second: Doty/Linke to accept the recommenda- 9. Consideration
lion o the Civil Service Commission, appointing of Recommenda
Officer Tim Smith for a 90 day period, to be tion from Pol
Acting Police Chief. Civil Service
5 ayes 0 nays Commission
Motion Carrie
Clerk/Administrator Pauley explained that Staff has
evaluated the parking and determined there
10. Consideration
would
still be sufficient parking space to meet the
of Staff Memo
Regarding Loo.
requirement.
Ends on 10
Attorney Meyers explained the BuildingInspector
Permit Applic
lion for Outd
determined this application to require a building
q g per-
mit, and that it is
Volleyball Co
not so much a zoning question as
it is a building code question, and since it is for
a commercial development, it is up to the Council's
descretion if they wish to review it. He added that
the developer has been warned that no liquor can be
consumed on the volleyball court, or outside in the
parking lot.
Mayor McCarty expressed concern with reaching too far
in controlling something of this nature. Attorney
Meyers further explained why it was before the Council.
Motion/Second: McCarty/Doty to approve the request
for a volleyball court and fence for the Loose -Ends
Night Club, with notification to the Police Department
of the potential for consumption of liquor in the
parking lot, or a conflict regarding the public
health, safety and welfare due to the proximity of
Highway 10.
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carriec
Mounds View City Council June 27, 1983
Regular Meeting Page Four
Director Johnson reviewed the request for a fill
permit for 3048 County Road 11-2. Ile noted that
Mr. Hato was present.
Councilmember Blanchard noted that Mr.. Ilaro had
just asked the Council for a special use permit
for an oversized building, and asked where it would
be placed on the lot.
Mr. Haro stated the lots are 638' deep, with the fill
to go in the rear 438'. Ile stated the proposed
garage would go in the small, narrow section toward
the front of the lot.
Motion/Second: McCarty/Doty to approve Mr. Haro's
request, contingent upon compliance with the Staff
recommendations listed in the memo of June 23, 1983,
Items 1-5.
5 ayes 0 nays
Mayor McCarty explained the cash escrow requirement
to Mr. Haro.
Director Johnson updated the Council on the installa-
tion of modifications in Treatment Plant #1.
He also reported that two calls had been received
from Rice Creek Watershed District regarding Mr.
Poplaars development, and that he might be required
to install a control outlet device, in addition to
what the City might require. He advised that
Mr. Poplaars might be back before the Council to
discuss it.
Director Johnson updated the Council on the Bob Waste
fill permit, stating that he had complied with two
of the three requirements, and is working on the third.
He advised that Rice Creek Watershed District has also
become involved.
Director Johnson updated the Council regarding the final
inspection on the Oak Park pond outlet structure, and
the work on Wells 5 and 6.
Attorney Meyers had no report.
Councilmember Hankner reported she had attended the
League of Minnesota Cities convention, and briefly
discussed the Parvow epidemic.
Councilmember Hankner reported that she and her
11. Consideration
of Staff/+amo
Regardir 1.11
Permit R est
for 3048
County Road H-
Motion
12. Report of
Director '4'
Public i� /
Community :vl
13. Report of
Attorney
14. Reports of
Councilm rs
Mounds View City Council June 27, 1983
Regular Meeting Page Five
----------------------------------------------------------------------
husband had visited the local liquor establishments
to observe how ID's were checked. She .stated they
did not observe much carding at one. She also stated
she had been told that one establishment had an under
age person working as a bartender.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley asked Councilmember Hankner
to get in touch with Acting Police Chief Tim Smith
with the information she was given, so that he might
check it out. He also advised that a letter had been
sent to all the liquor establishments.
Mayor McCarty reported he had met with the probation
officer for the Ramsey County Juvenile Service Center,
and had spoken with someone at the courthouse, and
neither of them had been aware of any extraordinary problem
of juveniles being served liquor in Mounds View.
Attorney Meyers noted there has been very good enforce-
ment by the law officers, both from the City Police
Department, and the Highway Patrol.
Councilmember Hankner noted that when the grass is
mowed along tlke boulevards, the clippings go out
into the street, and then when it rains, they go
into the storm sewer. Director Johnson stated he
would check into the matter.
Councilmember Blanchard reported she had attended an
airport meeting the previous Wednesday, and was not
able to attend the Planning Commission work session.
Councilmember Doty reported he had attended the meeting
of the Park Commission, where they prioritized the
desired park improvements, to be passed on to the
1984 budget.
Councilmember Linke reported the Festivities Commi-
ssion is finishing up preparations for the Festival
in the Park.
Councilmember Linke reported he had received a phone
call last Wednesday evening, from a citizen who
lived on the far end of town, complaining about the
music he could hear from the Bel Rae Ballroom, at
11 PM.
Mayor McCarty asked the status of having volunteers
from the City drive senior citizens to the Edgewood
Community Center for congregate dining once a week.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley replied he would check
with Park Director Anderson to see if he had a
response yet.
Mayor McCarty directed Staff to give Mr. Wagner a
copy of the article from the Administrator's Newsletter,
June 27, 1083
Mounds View City Council Page Six
Regular Meeting ---------------
------------------------------------------------
regarding the water pollution from the Arsenol, to be
used as a public news release. '
Mayor McCarty asked for concensus from the Council to
give no sympathy to any Council member or Department
Head found without a Festival in the Park button.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reviewed the cost of con- 15. Report of
verting roll pal. unit #101 from gasoline to LP, with Administrator
the difference being $2.50.
Motion/Second: Linke/Blanchard to authorize the
conversion of the roll pak unit to LP.
5 ayes 0 nays
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported he had received
a call from the new administrator/manager of GTf, Inc.,
stating they would like to be able to come back and
finish the Long Lake Road ditch job. Clerk/Administra-
tor Pauley stated he advised the gentleman he would
have to contact the bonding company for their approval,
and that also if they did do the work, they would have
to put everything back to the original specifications.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported they hope to have
the City Newsletter out on July 5, and that some
articles are being rewritten to update their informa-
tion.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reviewed the proposed costs
involved in the goal setting seminar, and reviewed
where he had been able to locate funds toward the cost.
Mayor McCarty stated he felt it was important for Clerk/
Administrator Pauley to attend his national conference
as it is very valuable to the City.
Motion/Second: McCarty/Blanchard to approve the request
for the seminar, and that the money be taken from the
contingency fund.
5 ayes 0 nays
Motion/Second: Doty/Linke to adjourn the meeting at
8:45 PM.
5 ayes 0 nays
Motion Carried
Motion Carried
16. Adjournment
Motion Carried
a
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
July 25, 1983
7:30 p.m.
A G E N D A
1. Call to Order
2. Roll Call - Blanchard, Doty, Hankner, Linke, McCarty
3. Approval of Minutes: July 11, 1983 (Regular Meeting)
(Received in 7/18/83 packet.)
4. Public Hearings - 7:40 p.m. - Alley Vacation in Block 1, Iron
Works Plat
7:50 p.m. - Cross of Glory Lutheran Church
Major Subdivision
5. Second Quarter 1983 Department Head Report
- Acting Police Chief Smith
6. Residents Requests and Comments From the Floor
------------------------------------------------
CITIZENS: BEFORE SPEAKING PLEASE GIVE YOUR
FULL NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE MINUTES
-------------------------------------------------
7. Approval of Consent Agenda
`ITEM A. Approve Resolution No. 1634 Approving Appointment of
Tim Pittman as a Full Time City Employee
ITEM B. Approve Resolution No. 1633 Amending Resolution
No. 1462 Establishing Various Fees and Charges
ITEM C. Approve Resolution No. 1636 Commending Mounds View
Festivities Commission for the 1903 "Festival in
the Park"
ITEM D. Licenses for Approval
ITEM E. Approve Resolution No. 1637 Approving Just and
Correct Claims Against City Funds
-continued-
AGENDA
July 25, 1983
Page Two
8. First Reading of Ordinance No. 345 Vacating 1.4 Feet of Alley
Right -of -Way in Block 1, Iron Works Plat
9. Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance No. 344 Amending
the Municipal Code of Mounds View by Amending Chapter 100,
Entitled "Intoxicat illy Liquors"
10. Consideration of Amendment to Contract for Professional
Services -ith John Johnson
11. Consideration of Memorandum from Parks, Recreation and
Forestry Director Regarding 1983 Conference Request
12. Report of Director of Public Works/Community Development
13. Report of Attorney
14. Report of Councilmembers - Blanchard, Doty, Hankner, Linke,
McCarty
1.5. Report of Administrator
16. Adjournment
MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Director of Public Works/Community Development
DATE: July 25, 1983
SUBEJCT: CONTRACTOR LICENSES
Please add the following 9 contractor license on tonight's consent
agenda (Item D) for approval:
General
Inter -City Builders - New
Star Homes, LTD. - New
Heating and Air Conditioning
Churchill's Home Heating & Cooling, Inc. - New
Sewer and Water
Olson's Plumbing - Renewal
All of the above licenses expire on June 28, 1984.
Thank you.
JCJ/bc
VONJ9
Cif of
!4
RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA
2401 HIGIII"AY 10
MOUNDS VIEW, MINN. 55112
19&3055
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MIN14ESOTA
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARI14G
VACATION OF ALLEY RIGHT-OF-WAY
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Council of the City of
Mounds View will meet on Monday, July 25, 1983 at 7:40 p.m.
at City Hall, 2401 Highway 10, Mounds View, Minnesota 55112,
to consider the vacation of the alley right-of-way, Block 1,
Iron Works Plat.
Anyone desiring to be heard with reference to this
matter may make oral or written presentation at this meeting.
Donald F. Pauley
Clerk -Administrator
(Bulletin: July 14, 1.983)
ITEM 4
'7rSO /''"'•
MEMO TO: CLerk-AdminlsLrator and City Council
FROM: Engineering/Planning Technician
DATE: July 21, 1983
SUBJECT: CROSS OF GLORY CHURCH MAJOR SUBDIVISION
Attached please find the following items for the public hearing
concerning the Cross of Glory Lutheran Church major subdivision:
1) Resolution No. 1635
2) Planning Commission Resolution No. 88-83
3) Planning Commission Minutes of 1/6/83
4) Staff Report
5) Copy of Preliminary Plat
This application is for the combining and subdividing of lots
only. No development is proposed at this time.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution No. 1635.
i
FJK/bc
Attachment
RESOLUTION NO. 1635
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE; OF MINNKSOTA
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT
FOR CROSS OF GLORY LUTIIIiRAN CHURCH
WHEREAS, representatives of Cross of Glory Lutheran Church
have submitted a proposal to subdivide five existing lots into
two lots for property located at 5472 Adams Street; and
WHEREAS, a major subdivision is being proposed cince the
properties involved total 2.11 acres; and
WHEREAS, the preliminary plat has been reviewed by Che
Mounds View Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has recommended to the
City Council approval of the preliminary plat by adopting
Planning Commission Resolution No. 88-83; and
WHEREAS, the City Council conducted 198ublic hearing on
the proposed major subdivision on July 25,
of
the public hearing being sent to all property owners within 350
feet; and
WHEREAS, the subdivision meets minimum 'Zoning Code
requirements;
NOW, THEREFORE, 8E IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View City
Council approves the preliminary plat of a major subdivision of
the Cross of Glory Lutheran Church property dated May, 1983,
revised June 9, 1983.
ATTEST:
Adopted this 25th day of July, 1983.
ayor
(SEAL)
Clerk -Administrator
MOUNDS VuIW PLANNING COMEn.gSLUM
RRSOLUTION No. Rh-111
CITY OF MOUNDS vl!'W
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OP THE MAJOR SUBDIVISION FOR
CROSS Of GLORY LUTHERAN CHURCH To CHNIIINE FIVE; LOTS INTO TWO
WHEREAS, an appllcalluu wan rccpived by City staff from
roprosentative:: of Gros:: or Glory Lutheran Church to combine the
existing five lot, intu Lwu IuCs; and
WHEREAS, since the property is 2,11 acres in size, a
major subdivision is necessary to combine the five lots; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed this
proposed maJur subdivision fur conformity to Mounds View Code;
and
WHEREAS, the two Proposed lots mcut minimum area require-
ments for R-1 zoned property; and
WHEREAS, setback distances from the existing buildings to
1_ the proposed property line meets minimum requirements;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED IhaL the Mounds View
Planning Commission recommends to the City Council approval of
the major subdivision/lut combination ruquest by Cross of Clary
Lutheran Church, 5472 Adam:; Street, to combine the existing five
lots into two lots as shown on the registered land survey dated
May, 1987 by Suburban liagiunering,
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission
directs staff to forward this recommendation to the City Council
prior to approval of the minutes.
ATTEST:
(SEAL)
Adopted this 6th day or July, 1987.
Chairman —
I
Director of Public Works
-
Community Development
f
r-
PROGE :DINGS 0V THE PLANNING COMMISSION
CI.T'i OF M011110S VIEW
RAMSEY COINTY, I•IINMIiSOTA
Regular lieeting
APpRdV July 1983
Ii"' �� Mounds View City Hall
G"' ` 2401 Ilwy. 10, Mounds view, MN 55112
---------------------------------------------
The Mounds View Pl;uuiinl; Cammissi.nn was c;IIlcd la
order by Chairman 1•Iou11tin at 7:30 PM.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Coumiis:;iouers Quick, Anderson,
McCarthy, Miller :tnd Chairman Mountin.
It was noted that Commissioner Forslund had an
excused absence.
Commissioner Warren arrived at 7:31 PM.
ALSO PRESENT: Engineering/Planning Technician
Lampe an ouncilmember Blanchard.
Motion/Second: McCarthy/MiI1cr to approve the June
1-,-1W_ana June 15, 1983 minutes as presented.
6 ayes 0 nays
There were no residents requests or coimnents from
the floor.
Technician Kampel reviewed the proposal, stating that
the members of the church planning committee have
requested a lot combination of five lots into two to
be able to sell an existing educational building
located at the south end of the property. lie noted
that this is the preliminary plat which is uo for
approval, which will then go on to the Council, and
will then go into the final plat sta-e. He noted
that no changes had been made since the Planning
Commission had reviewed it at the June 15 meeting.
Mike Weiss, a representative from the Cross of Glory
Church, stated he had nothing to add to Technician
Kampel's report.
1. Call. to
2. Roll Call
3. Approval of
Minutes:
June 1, 1983
June 15, 1983
Motion Carrie
4, Residents Re-
quests and
Comments from
the Floor
5.
nuauw .1.,
Major Subdi
sion, R-1,
Case 135-83
Mounds View Planning Commission
Regular Mecting
.. I Y
Motion/Second:- Miller/Quack Lo adopt ReSOInLir)❑ NU
, - recommending approval of the major Suhdivisio�,.,
for Cross of Glory Church to combiuc five tuts into
two.
5 ayes 0 nays 1 abstention
Commissioner Anderson abstained from the vote as he had
not been present at the June 1.5 u:ceting for discussion.
Technician Kampel reporterl that the annlicant is
requesting to subdivide an existing 157.50' lot into
two lots measuring 75' and 82.5'. Ile stated that since
the Planning Commission reviewed it on June 15, Mr. Vogt
has gone before the Council, requesting building per-
mits, which the Council approved, so that he may start
building his home.
It was noted that Mr. Vogt, nor a representative for
his, was not present.
Motion/Second: Quick/miller to adopt Resolution No.
$ - , recommending approval of a minor subdivision for
Frank Vogt for property located at 8145 Red Oak Drive.
5 ayes
0 nays 1 abstention
Commissioner Anderson
had not been present
discussion,
abstained from the vote as he
at the .tune 15 meeting for
Technician Kampel reported he had received a call
from Dynamic Designers, notifying the City of their
intention to come up with a revised plan.
Jim Cepress, of Dynamic Designers, stated he under-
stands their plan was not approved at the last work
session, with a problem o!: being over the 903 eleva-
tiCn. .. He stated they have onne hark rn the architect.
� -
who is now working o:. a new, revised plan, which will
be ready next week and will be considerably different.
It will have 8 units instead of 10, wiL;i less parking
required, and everything will be within the 903
elevation, and the side yard setbacks will be alright,
with just one front yard setback that will be 5' short.
July 6, 1983
I'age Two
PPBOVE
Mr, Cepress stated that he will get copies of the new
plan to Ci�y Hall next week, for the Planning Commissioners
to review, and then they would like to meet with them
at the next work session to go over the plan, and since
they feel all the requirements have been met, they are
requesting the Planning Commission to make the work session
an official meeting so that action can be taken on the
plan.
Motion Car
6. Frank Vogt,
8145 Red Oak
Minor Subd.,
R-1,
Case 136-83
Motion
7. Dynamic Desig
ers, 7656/76E
Woodlawn Dr.,
Dvlpt. Propos
Case 43-79
CASE: 135-83
ITEM: Major Subdivision (Combining 5 Lots into 2)
APPLICANT: Cross of Glory Church
LOCATION: 5472 Adams Street
Legal: Spring Lake Park !Highlands
Except the south 12 feet of Lot 11
and all of Lots .12 through 15, Block 2
SUMMARY OF REQUEST
Members of the church planning committee request a lot combination of
five lots into two to be able to sell an existing educational building
located at the south and of the property.
PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS
I. A major subdivision is being requested since any change in proporty
lines which necessitates City approval constitutes a subdivision
and also since the property is 2.11 acres in size.
2. Adequate side yard setbacks are shown from the south side of the
church structure to the proposed property line. Code requires a
30 foot side yard setback (58 foot is proposed), (40.10, Subdivision
D, 1).
3. All other setbacks for both the church building and the one-story
frame building have been met.
4. Surveys have been revised to show the exclusion of the south 12
feet of Lot 11 instead of the south 13 feet.
J
v."
{M{
MM
ILNx{
1n 1
II
^II
i
�'�
I
� I
A..up 4 iW IJNJxK
I •1
wP».a ai ..J +oJJ xN
IV
1
{ 1
M w1 .tiJ Paaa'a
I i
�n..uvrJnlY.wMN
L
it
✓U�
�
/h,, 1
� •I
lout
I
sJ�
1
5
M1. .L1I� •aJ� .
e s �
'I 21
L OAfIA of F90f W
MAJOR h0001V(�ION
(Lol 60MOWATIN
71
qj-LJ (�N O26 4!, I YfeftDf 1Q4 6� W _ 1 �n
;GROBERG ST 8 Y' — J 1 — u'• ;,:Hoop DIaT NO 621
r ZN .. I.,.., n C 12pV� 4 0 24 4 � azo-oy
/I
F
23 S rl
M • II F
16t'SA'
16
4 r
_ zl {{ �.
n ' IN
"�
n n ,
s7.
BELLE LANE
1
Sl-Si LL
134 3 2 934
'e5 Or Q I14 I � r'If j 1j p 7 6 I 9 10 II 12f
1 �+T rnvw,
' ro 5
A � A
5 laael a :I �:I �:I' n: I•te: - �....
I32 '2 1
2 I
31 2 • I 311 2
19 3
r
J
1� q
CONSE14T AGENDA
July 25, 1983
The Consent Agenda is a technique designed to expedite handling of
routine and miscellaneous official business of the City Council.
The entire Agenda may be adopted by the Council in one motion. The
motion for adoption is non -debatable and must receive unanimous
approval. By request of any individual Councilmember, any item can
be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed upon the Regular Agenda
for debate.
TTFM A. Adopt Resolution 140. 1634 - Approving Appointment of
Tim Pittman as a Full Time City Employee
ITEM D. Adopt Resolution No. 1.633 - Amending Resolution No. 1462
Establishing Various Fees and Charges
ITEM C. Adopt Resolution No. 1636 - Commending Mounds View
Festivities Commission for the 1983 "Festival in the Park"
ITEM D. Licenses for Approval
General - 6/30/84
Clark Home Improvement Co., Inc. - New
D.L.C., Inc. - New
Sussel Corporation - Renewal
Heating & Air Conditioning - 6/30/84
Vern's Service & Supply, Inc. - Renewal
Sewer & water - Expire 6/30/84
Mounds View Plumbing & Heating - Renewal
ITEM E. Adopt Resolution No. 1637 - Approving Just and Correct
Claims Against City Funds
A
RESOLUTION NO. 1634
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE APPOINTMENT OF
TIM PITTMAN AS A FULL TIME CITY EMPLOYEE
WHEREAS, the Mounds View City Code, Chapter 6.04
defines a full time employee as one who has successfully
completed the required probationary period and who was
employed on a schedule of at least 40 hours per week; and
WHEREAS, Tim Pittman has successfully completed
his six month probation period;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City
Council of the City of Mounds View does hereby appoint
Tim Pittman as a full time City employee with Mr. Pittman's
salary to be per the contract rates in the Labor Agreement
With I.U.O.E., Local No. 49.
Adopted this 25th day of July, 1983
ATTEST:
(SEAL)
Mayor
Clerk-AdminisL-rator
■
`t�-14,L. B
RESOLUTION NO. 1633
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 1462
ESTABLISHING VARfOUS FEES AND CHARGES
WHEREAS, Resolution No. 1462, adopted on June 12, 1982,
established various fees and charges as provided for in the
Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, it is the desire of the City of Mounds View to
charge for the provision of agendas and minutes to individuals
and organizations not directly related to the City, i.e., City
Council, Commissions, staff and representatives of the press.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Mounds View that the following annual charge be levied
for the expense of providing copies of City Council agendas
and/or minutes:
Agendas and Consent Agendas $40.00/year
Minutes $25.00/year
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that these charges will go into
effect and be levied effective September 1, 1983.
Adopted this 25th day of July, 1983.
ATTEST:
Mayor
(SEAL)
Clerk —Administrator
RESOLUTION No. 1636
L-
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE. OF MINNESO'rA
RESOLUTION COMMENDING MOUNDS VIEW FESTIVP!'[ES COMMISSION FOR
THE 1983 "FESTIVAL IN 191E PARK"
WHEREAS, the Mounds View Festivities Commission was
responsible for coordinating and implementing the Ninth Annual
"Festival in the Park" which was conducted on Sunday, July 10, 1983;
and
WHEREAS, the festival was attended by over 7,000 Mounds View
residents; and
WHEREAS, the Ninth Annual "Festival in the Park" celebrated
the 25th Anniversary of the City of Mounds View; and
WHEREAS, highlights of the 1983 "Festival in the Park"
included an ecumenical church service, refreshments, community parade,
color guard, showmobile entertainment, bingo, youth and adult games;
and
WHEREAS, the afternoon and evening festivities were
concluded with a spectacular fireworks display; and
WHEREAS, the entire afternoon and evening was made possible
through the generous and dedicated donation of volunteer labor and
time from not only the Festivities Commission members but also other
^ivic interested residents.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the
City of Mounds View, on behalf of the residents of Mounds View, hereby
congratulate and heartily commend each of the 1983 Festivities
Commission members including Shirley Munholand, Mark Mack, Patricia
Coffey, Tom Gow, Craig McCluskey, Jan ouick, Sandy Shackle and Mary
Saarion for their outstanding contribution; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of
Mounds View also extends their thanks and appreciation to the Mounds
View Parks and Recreation Department and their staff for their
involvement in making the "Festival in the Park" a success; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of
Mounds View commend the City Public Works Department for their efforts
in preparing the grounds for the 1983 "Festival in the Park".
Adopted this 25th day of July, 1983.
ATTEST:
Mayor Duane McCarty
Councilmember Blanchard
Councilmember Linke
Councilmember Hankner Councilmember Doty
(SEAL)
Clerk -Administrator Pau ey
1637
�bft 6
r :11 affairs
ljo
I.; I.-
18127
J;
18144
41,901.50
18145
18150
430.60
11693
11801
72,792.24
. ... ... — -----
Th'i'Al. AV.',1MT
1':;-*
115,124.34
i:::.
of nny
I NU11' THE'lil"FONE, be it r:!:;Oivud L)':0- WA: (;i'.Y Crjur,-Cil of Mounds View
horoby lipproll.'i Ow :11 1 i-I.:; of by Uip
Vote ayes I
F. 1 *ji --k --kJ IT.) I iIII T FF1 I t 0 1 1
CHECK
r18145
18146
18147
18148
18149
18150
AMOUNT
$ 20.00
50.00
50.00
100.00
147.60
63.00
$ 430.60
ADDITIONAL DIRECT EXPENDITURES
CLAIMANT
Blue Ribbons Stables
Counselor Realty
Clementines
Overland Express
Harvey Glomnen
Gov't Training Service
PURPOSE
Festival in the Park
Festival in the Park
Festival in the Park
Festival in the Park
Festival in the Park
Conferences
i;H• GKF a N 0 6 T C L
— G 13 127
900. 1
41-3128
iOJ+'�
O 1?-1'l9
7'• •
Oitl130
30^•GJ
O1`i132
0itl133
300.iJ
_ 01813i
33,Z1C.82
018137
21 57,10
0IF138
1�'.00.:7
U1+'140.
19`;6J. 75
J_18141
131.�C
018142
1�39e.80
.=-- - -
018143
—
I01.03
_018144
86.5J
16
41�901.GO
r V 011H'S A"�ui;(Arl
;IIY Cf I.6utlC'.
c1LK 1 K r(U:�!* LCc�.:
IlV1TIES OCih1:S1all
Tillfi '! S ICI.
•1
el L J COLGLaS
r,..11�IIm . .,.":':-,Icf.
PLU` ',10i.;:f �IJJLr
FESTI'+IIiiS CCNN1.`.�Slob
•
ptT C -FFcY
FF511VJTiic ;'-INI:iSICh
SKY NIGH APT
FES11'VOUS 'V' f SlCt'
•
FIST :TAIL CAHK OF
SALAFIES, r,,GLLd-
An0-SALa�it5,1_rF+f' <T TINE
i22
L I L Grt iT
FESTIVIII.IS CtVv.l 5I.b
•
STATE TREAS - F ` 1 A
PENSIOhS
WILL IAP FAFN
PFCGFdF In51KlG1 S
•
C JUINSON .___
_GTHER-H.GLUS10M:_
_.
AtG-ACH N+ CHARGL,, FAIAELE
i•
11MIDS VIEh FEINTING
FESTIVITIE.S._CMUSSIOh_.
j
!
OLL 2Ak pALLkUCM
FESIIVIIIES CCMHISSIOh
i•
Nh ST C.OhLING MUF ASSh
FF.STTVITI(5 CCIIHISSICh
•
NV JC V.OhEh
FESTIVITIES WIMISSICh
NLGG"';C.kY fY.fhhplTUb'ES SINCE
L-51 ;AUr;GII hEEi]NG
+,
s�•
id
CITV CF' 1!tJ'a
J1•e
t ^i.
— —�
--
i
J
"u11E93
1' .'ii
..,,ii: "r .T- _ •.!t:; 1C1' `L
•'r ( _. _ ...t .. V
-- - ----;
_.;.,Oil694
7.1:
=[.il:; f-CUL:f; i!•`
'v:.,' l
�.
Ullf95
�39.aS
�LUrt'cl.t:
14Ec '.:!'(tal
���
'; C11E95
196.A5
1Gni;A VEaT-iNA44 N,`I'
F,C[_;-.,,F;•L
•
_,,g11697
259.6y
L,'PIIAL LLECI-OW1L,
=F.t1 Ss Cli T
"
OliE98
,iA7.•i7
C7''PL1; ti,l a 1NG
LCIIFF(hi
J;e
O11E99
1, 41.
Gi -t UFLICAT1i,G t-40C
COPY i;LFPLIt'
_
17
10
•
700
A'..76
(.,.1:. It:' I:dL
,,Lilt. 5V45., L.,'-rY
_-_.—
Gil 701
174.4:'
f iC P'CIC ;PC[ VC
SLFPLLES, ELL
12
74
011702
1§.;7
FLU': Pt Ft Lk
r.EFAI S, I:FICLEs
__.1111703
�84.;,
G'!,,: cL SPCA",
SLFPLIES,CP rAIINC.
L'11704
21A. Y,9
6("4°'v, ATPLETIi SUPPLY
Uhl F[!'h<. 4 tL:TF ING
'1
011705
115. J
sf ;WE
SLFFLIES,CFEnATIt.;G
L
11706
85.84
J ! 010 SUPPLY
SEPPLIES,__VEFICL:
AbU-RiFAIAS, •,'F;.L;;
—__M
e
,.
_I,C-<LFFLIES, i:dtFhini
('_�'
0117C•7
t,7bf."I'
JOHN I, JLi'•bscj:
Clhcb CF FRESSIONAL SF.PV
n
— .1
AbU-AChIF. CH:kGFS PAYAcIE
1N
�''
014708
;3, 4'1.::'
1'0 WA;T: Ci%T'LL CL'!'
,: f L It C
N
�u
AI'O-F7.I.(. FAST!. .,;-'bI OChr
lu�.
-..__.
01172y
IV.75
..
VPLANCI F COUCTS
FESTIVITIES Gi:Hi:I•;1011
__011711
82.90
n!ti'IFS^IA TVC INC
SVPLIES,_E_G_UIPn,.t,T _
011711
??.
OttY ;i FLC7i;, vI_s,
k(FUhLS
a•
OIL712
104.3h
JP:, Vi 1: Ct• CS6 hl'nt
SLPPLIESYCFERATI'ii
v
!a
•
11713
122.11
\' d •',1L 1'Lii'HJI: 1;0
,t r+!.,. c. LF.PNCNf
ICATION. r
�
..-_-.____I1
Oil714
3013'..,:;i
C11Y
,iT I n E
b
s
IN
n
i
'. CII f nr NUUNiI VIN
I• CliFCKf A ;1 U
um
A C L H i f P. ( .. L
9I1115 ;r"•20 hC� +IGhIC;J Fid_
G1171S 171."9 t,! . �r[';ihT('J !'LNL
911717 n,107.5c NO -IVI•N 'IA)F'.1 PC1:1
I�' 011718 39172.U3 1, ThE ra C1AI(5 PCMEn
e
G11.719
94.75
nGrThC':n ;.TAIL. r'Cb(k
v .
01172^
Ail„j0
NO VAC.K—KCLANI iQU11' !nC
011721
2[';
°`PS CCLu -ICTTLING CC
F
34.1"
Pint'e, COAL FUrSERY +
7e ;s5?
_01i722
x:
- �71
011723
3,277.78
K.•r;Er CCenTr TRtA>UA_i
011724
36. 71
nCAO .4UNn:f PLkCEL '.Ek,
011725
IO9.G0
MANS PUSAGKEc; CO
e, h
':.' +,
`--.011726
60.00
PAMLLA S ROSE
j;
011727
21.46
S + 1 CHIEF PhUUUCTS
011728
354.80
ST PAUL ANC SUEUREAN
r"
+t
911729 - .
90.J8
Sv ITh LUili;rn CC
�r
•"• 011730 r'.81.45
011731
144.i3O
F
r. 011733 17.91
f:
CITY OF SPRIKG LAKE. PALK
STATE IREASURER
II°L SHA,iING I LS SYS IFC
TAPG(T
- MM
,:tL-f i 51[111; �'r ISICD
i:.
SLPFItc:,�k -..
AQ- SLFPLii LL
LhE-h'ATLFAL 6:
AfU-1rAFFIC � .> - FIECT
•
lLt.04ILl1Y ---
.;AC-t.c:1LFa
n
r.LECThICIIY
SLPFLIES,
F E F L 1; 0
e�
I9AFFIC S MALS - ELECT
ANG-CChPL�ICAIICNS-TELEFFCKE
,I
CCNT. SVLS.e CELIVERY
NISC CFFICE ScPFLILS
$ALA+IESOCKNPARI TINE
NISC OFFICE SWFLIES
SLFFLIES,CFEti�TIr,6
'>,�.
SLPFITF$,CFERATINC -
AF.0 -rISC (FFICE SUPPLIES
At.I-'LFPUESe VCI(ICL.'
rFJ-r-IA:.IES,ILCF+FH_i TIFL
-- '
C.LLLRIIM-OTN1� ACCYS
aLFFIIES9 ECUIPF .I
CTkC� FPCFES5ICNAL_SER-V__
MISC CFFICE SLPFLIES
F—
i
Lr-
pit 735
011736
Oil 137
I 'LL ' I : f
6 r f y i L . f.' 1 !. C
Cify Ci �"ITL 'LL' LIA:
Oil 738
NILL10
qlI 739
113
L A N Cdr,I,CSr
Oil 740
18e. 0
VICKIL PLANCH Ur
Oil 74i
176, ril
mApy sS,rrr.-rwi , ru
011742
24 1. 25
X,ki:N CZRL!Tr01
Oil 743
250.00
AARON F41-
.111 ?.44—
165, 0 0
04WIl HAR;ISUh
OIL 745
215.100
P,WL J:`H4.0ri
Oil 746
77.
X ANK LAQ
0 It 767
lrj!.i,j
'!CALLISUR
111 746
tali.. i
CF,'^!! ;?_1cCNF'
011749
5
A' I Ti I L I C T
i5o. co
MICHrLt r o(I.-- M.P
111751
343, 75
Ji 4NNL Ni I
0 it 752
251.t,J
k' TT C h 14 " I h C
011753
53,60
ePf I! PC TEr SON
Olt 754
16v . 0
U I. V f 1" y il." f,f.:
011755
300.G6
JILL SLAWN
c
r
L PFL f I I hG
IL
4 t
PT
FhCG Jr it T L
F L G 1, P 1;, 1
®r
F S C C F A I, I h S 1 .9 L C I
F F C G I t 0s]"Lc1";
f-ac; t It. T - L T
el
Sur, o ? p 11, 1
PAMIte It i I W,
M
1: U
e:
'Ir uFL
i 7
15:' t-'
A'
:111758
d95. 8?
1; .
J11759
87.1i
1:760
452.!
1;151
88.GJ
G: T; r':.= Tf..'-i TTCt'
.11'
4f..41
TSTN C111 ;NS trL:LLc
1:763
EL11IN: LCCn + ..OJVIGf
011764
44;.,
LL-iNir,l Ki :E' 11C _:1 4i
'•
011755
52.`t0
ST1-4141 C:'.Nf,1PAN
UU766
3.51
SHIRLi m;nHCL.d+ii
117C:7
i•"..c3
i9:aNY .,._'L11,
1.1t,9
2:;.•;0
AM9E;1 FfiF.EPO'--E
1t77i.
1':..0
NIULE KUTCMCF'
r:
011771
10.i10
-
GAi?RIELLE LAME
011772
ill 0
KNISTE': t'6L1w
1171•3
2C.:C
SI,nAM %CL:.CN
;.
311774
3.59
DENNIS OCOANELL
D
r'
:1 77'
U. id
CHE'RYL CL`C'V
D
1! 17 .
1..::1
COLLEEr1 SRITF.
11777
Z9. 0
GOOD TIME ATIPACTiCMS
DI
r i__._...011.778
i
VALERIi. AMUtti;SiN
DPI'
G11779
. ...
iG'ti GiniF,'.
If'
II"
^L178O
1-..1
RUIE91 EVtFETT
e
lie
F1F-i S�FFL.
SUpIiES, :•T r—�-
o4T•-LLIIL'
::L,1�IEIi TIME
F'rSilVlTl
r E F L r,
r, E F L N — —
h E F L
N E F L
n C r L 1 C --
E F L t, C
k E F U
R f. F L ti ----
re L F L N
F LS I :'. 111 :. i 510D _T-`
CITY C)F
F)i.l,l,[ VIEW
; C '' ,. t I 1 ,• L.
fi '!•
t-3! Pah i0
t'+
�y.�
•
°117A1
•'°
... :I,. fsL1'.
rrcG�tF
;Ij(f.i:T09$
, 7£�'
I
U11782
J
r:TTi
i
fT. f
•�
' r L
I• L
y.� 1,
11178i
J11 784
2.;
OIL 785
L' N
:• t: T L I•
C
011 786
•Ji
1
„
.^I
011787
1: :J
_
ICa: 'ikCGSitUr,
o>
die
t.
rl
C 11 739
d^
ViFtill JL� K
�I_FUnt$
J:'
nl-
011791
44.�0
Lrr.r'L�:: KIiNE�-
t c
I76
OIL 79.
40.JJ
F!,:a a FGCC HCLLU_!%Y
FLILS
o
Y
}
011193
40.00
O 4 U10 ), NIILI.?'
F fii,l'S
n
—.—...P:
u+
40.g9
l•'tY ^CCCI`
011795
7^. ,:)
0, IN AES
c
r
'
011796
10.J0
NE'GNAN GIFFLeY
F
b E L N
E
n
__
011797
3E.G[)
FRfl HILLSAUS
�7•
alPPlriSr`f
J11798
3Z I
ACE ;AI)IATOR
:FA? „ t:.l;;
-
I, ;
011799
22.80
LC^iG LNK't FOFO TP.ACICF
c
.,LF•?LIE.,
CI,;.illc5
-- I,v
011800
17.16
NALLING iid05
SLPPLIEir
_;li '•r:T
lit
An0-SLrrll:
p—0-119U1
41.�.'l
V ElY rA,Nr;
6cFLrriS
II
1r•
~ '
109
72 792.24
r
CHECY.S HIP, ITiCN
I,
,
"
TOTAL Of
125 CHECKS TOTAL
114,19.i.74
- --`�
�
I
Ah
ORDINANCE NO. 345
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
AN ORDINANCE VACATING 14 FEET OF ALLEY RIGHT-OF-WAY
IN BLOCK I, IRON WORKS PLAT
The Council of the City of Mounds View does hereby ordain:
SECTION I. The 14 feet of alley right-of-way in Block I,
Iro;i Works Plat shall be vacated.
SECTION II. This ordinance shall take effect thirty (30)
days from and after the date of its publi-
cation.
Read by the Council of the City of Mounds View on the day
of 1987.
Read and passed by the Council of the City of Mounds View this
day of 1983.
ATTEST:
(SEAL)
Mayor
Clerk -Administrator
ORDINANCE No. 344
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNEAOTA
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE MUNICIPAL CODE
OF MOUNDS VIEW BY AMENDING CHAPTER 100,
ENTITLED "INTOXICATING LIQUORS"
The Council of: the City of Mounds View does hereby ordain:
SECTION I. Chapter 100.09, Subdivision 3, Sunday
Sales, is amended as follows:
Subdivision 3. Sunday Sales. Nothwith-
standing the provisio�f Subdivision 1,
"on -sale" establishments licensed to sell
intoxicating liquor on Sunday may serve
same between the hours of 12 o'clock
noon and 12 o'clock midnight on Sundays
in conjunction with the serving of food.
In addition, the City Council may
authorize, by license, a icensee to
serve xi
intocating liquors between the
Fours of 10.00 a.m. and 12.00 noon on
Sunday _ in conq'uncti.on with the serving
that the licenseo estauj11 1w,c116
formance with the Minnesota
SECTION II. This ordinance shall take effect 30 days
after the date of its publication.
Read by the Council of the City of Mounds View on this llth of
July , 1983.
Read and passed by the Council of
the City of Mounds View this
day of 1983.
ATTEST: Mayor
(SEAL) Clerk -Administrator
r% MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council
1
FROM: Director of Public Works /(:ommnnity Development
DATE: July 21, 1983
SUBJIiCT: JOHN C. JOHNSON CONTRACT AMENDMEINT
Attached is a copy of the revised contract amendment concerning
special projects for the balance of 1983 per Council direction.
The amendment adjusts upward the special project hours from 210
to 870. This incluaes the 319 hours spent through June 25, 1983
plus the additional 551 hours estimated to be needed through
December 31, 1983. (See Exhibit A.) The work priority will be
to complete:
1) MSA resurfacing project
2) 1983 seal coat project (part of 5 year plan)
3) St. Stephen drainage project
4) Storm water management plan
5) Balance of 5 year street maintenance plan
6) Review developer applications as received or as
necessary
^ Items 1, 2 and 3 are for 1983 construction work, as soon as they
are wrapped up then item 4 will be number one priority. item 6
will be scattered, as necessary, throughout the year. Special
effort will be made to minimize item 6 time by shifting work to
other staff personnel.
Work on water treatment plant modifications and sanitary sewer
monitoring plan will be covered by the 10 hours per week
allocated in the current contract. This will only address wort,
necessary in 1983 and will not cover any of the large range
planning activities.
If you have any questions, please contact me.
JCJ/bc
Attachments
C
rAd
6601 - 75th Avenue N.
Brooklyn Park, Minnesota 55428
July 25, 19H3
Honorable Mayor and City Connell
City of Mounds View
2401 Highway III
Mounds View, Minnesota 55112
Dear Mayor and Members of the City Council:
This letter is to confirm the amendment of the Professional Services
Contract dated December 2, 1982 between the City of Mounds View and
John C. Johnson. The existing contract provides for 1,040 hours (an
average of 20 hours per week) funded by the general, sewer and water
funds and 210 hours to be used as directed for special projects.
This amendment increases the special projects hours from 210 hours up
to 870 hours. The hours are to be utilized primarily for the follow-
ing special projects:
Hours $ $ $
I)
MSA 1983 Resurfacing Project
122
$2,745.00
2)
Comprehensive Street Maintenance Plan
180
4,050.00
3)
St. Stephen Street Drainage Project
127
2,857.50
4)
Storm Water Management Plan
52
1,170.00
5)
Miscellaneous Planning/Development Proposal
70
1,575.00
Review as Needed
551
$12,397.50
The work scope for the special projects listed above shall be as
detailed in Exhibit A.
It is further agreed that either party, upon written notice, may
terminate for just cause the special projects listed above.
If this agreement amendment is satisfactory, then please sign in the
space provided and return one signed copy to me.
Very truly yours,
ohn C. Johnson, P.C.
JCJ/bc
cc: Don Pauley, Clerk -Administrator
Accepted this day of _
1983 by the City of Mounds View
Minnesota, by _----_--_.
Mayor
ATTEST:
Clerk -Administrator
��
EXIIIBLT A
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT WITH
JOHN C. JOHNSON
Work scope for 1983 special projects shall he as follows
(projecLs are Listed by priority):
$$$
Ilnnrs
1) 1983 MSA ResurfacingProgram
a)
Propare
preliminary feasibility
0
ana Lys it;
b)
Prepare
final feasibility report
4 to 8
c)
Prepare
plans and specifications
30 to 40
d)
Obtain bids
and award contract
8 to 12
e)
Administer
Construrlinn
25 to 40
f)
Prepare
final MSA paperwork
8 to 12
TOTAL
75 to 112
2) Comprehensive Street Maintenance Plan
a) Inventory of existing streets 90 to 110
b) Identify repair needs 29 to 30
c) Develop annual maintenance plan 16 to 24
d) Evaluate funding options 8 to 16
$ 2,745.00
TOTAL 134 to 180 $ 4,050.00
3) St. Stephen Street Drainage
a) Survey work 0
b) Easement description 2 to 4
c) Easement acquisition 8 to 12
d) Prepare plans and specifications 12 to 16
e) Obtain bids 8
f) Administer construction 8 to 12
TOTAL 38 to 52 $ 1,00.00
4) Storm Water Management Plan
a)
Delineate drainage area
8
to
12
b)
Establish runoff facturs
16
to
25
e)
Map and calculate drainage area
50
to
60
d)
Calculate existing peak discharge
8
to
12
e)
Calculate existing system capacity
8
to
12
f)
Analyze system alternates
32
to
40
g)
Prepare draft report
12
to
16
Sub -total 134 to 177
Word done by Technician 40 to 50
TOTAL 94 to 127 $ 2,587.50
5) Review of Developer planning
applications (estimate only will
depend on actual number of
applications.
TOTAL 70 $ 1,575.00
GRAND TOTAL 551 $12,397.00
L-"7'LC-!dam /t
MEMO TO: Mounds View City Council
ector
FROM: parks,ruce KRecreation �and rForestry
DATEI: July 211 19113
RE: 1983 Conference RequesL
oL the 19113 National RecreaLion and Park
Attached is a copy
AS-SOci,ltion Rink Plonnin'l and Mninl.�:nance :school, The Park
Planning and Maintenance thleoNl is a R.P.A.two WhoseaPurposetisntorbring
planned and sponsored by developing and
those who are responsible for maintaining, l d
planning park and recreation facilities together to discuss and
iodolo
fieldd in the
. the
Stafflatest
wouldtechniques
recommend thatyinstead ofeerenceattending
the 1903 National Recreation and tart Association on Cof onmorenbeneEit
which has been budgeted in 1903,
to the City and to myself personally to attend the Park Planning
ing the
and Maintenance School. The 1983 hhisebeenrsettatd$671.00 which
National Conference in Kansas City
would compare to the following breakdown to attend the Park
Planning and Maintenance School:
$244.00
Air Fare to Colorado Springs 85,00
Registration... .......
Room - 5 days 0 $30 (assuming staff can 150.00
find someone to room with) 15.00
one banquet ticket ........... ••••••••• " 1.00
One tour ticket... ..............,,,, 15.00
One Flying "W" supper and bus ,100.00
Five days of meals 0 $20/day ......
TOTAL PROPOSED FOR PARK PLANNING SC11OOL.... $610.00
Staff has included copies of the 1983 budget request and 1984
amounts for
budget request which outlined theattending ing the 1983Park oplanning
should the Council approve
and Maintenance School.
to attend the first year of a two'
RECOMMENDATION: To allow staff. and
� Maintenance School
year programbudgetedo ofthe
ut of the 1983Pat
onferencebudget, AccountNo
to
4362.
BKA/sll
Attachment
rE
r
For
BUDGET REQUEST
06iect Title Cunft•nnce
Account Mo. 4362
Des cru)LlmI
Dent,
Team
Lour
ReouesI
Pr000sed
Annr
1983 N,It. 11.A. COnl'crcnie
------- --.
_ .--_--_--
Director, Parks, Rccrvatiuu :111J I:oI :;11. —
--•_.__---.—.-.-
National Confcrcacc-••--•--
---•__----
-_-•--�-_--
Kansas City, Missouri __.-.--.__--
--_---•-..---...-____-_-
t)D
�iCb.lSCl'at 1011.._..__ _ __ _ _ ._ ..
_•1 _...�75.
Ai.rflirc lSupgrsa).cr S196_00• rnun�lt.r[p.._ _
Meals 00/J iy _..._-
100.011
I 0 �
Lodyi_ng_--5_d1iY_E1_,i'111..00/Jnv•__.._-... _ .
__. _�110:0t1...._._..-----�JZ
r•:I.11 Con I'vrrace rt,;h,::tlt
I'S.uD
IDS_
include;;. Lwo l;c.I!xlr.in!, a1 the ka111,•1,
__......_.._..--•----
Ilotcl. basal on doUhlc orcup;wcc _-----...
--..._----
-------..------
Pr0.[TtlIS Supervisor __...__.._._ ._ _
..__..
_._.._._......_
hI:R,11.A, fa.l.l_Con[crcncc _
.-_125.00-..—.`-IbL$
includes twoLLU1,11ts lodging ;It the f;ahlor_Hotel
based based on douhle uccupauC.y__..__..._.._.._. .---.
---_-...---
Two One day oilS-i to IDU I'L! I5,DD —^-
�30.00
--
Estimated 10
---
Administrators Use Only;
(enter on Form '!.)
91i1 R(1
I•Ilc Two conl'Crcnce" Iwdgcled far ,uc thc_s:11 as in�,as� vc_irs. StarF_-
�has saattended -the Nat.iena) I:unfrrcneC-I'or the pasP_ri_e••Itt years and [eels_
1►� S 'u 1�g�X. 1 ]ill_! 1...15-011..11l.l :l Pill_.U•+LL'_f2tL1_lJ 11 fSL'e:e!.Ri12
•� L r:l i)t i.itn.M._
BUDGET 14-OIIEST
00ject 'fltll:
Description I Dept. Team roc
Reouesl Propused Apv
;. la,llnlcu•;Iq,; :;rIgN,1-
lh._innugl_lla!;E;_ l'I;mpl.tnJ. _. ._._._.... ._ _...._.._..._..___.
2nd your coul::;o ,:Urri,.ru:um ._.._._... .._.._.----------.— —
Colorr1110 :;Ln•ln,l:;, C„n. ... _.. _.._
.'W u$ 05.00
Rcrli:�tra t i . n v,, I.0 75.00
10 meals
c $1. iUilll,:;ll.
L,odglnd_• , nifill (a
;,I;n.OU 300.00 __._._....__
Airfare - :nlper :lavol, IMind I1. 248.00
M.R.P.A. Pall ('Unlcl,rncr __----------
_ _. .
Program _Su )crvi::or 95.00
Director 95.OU
•--•-----...
WO olle-day
----- _ ._ . .... 30.00
M.R.P.A. - —•. .- -- ----
(enter on form Z1 IS 92R.00
Administrators Use Unlr: I
Phis budget item i!; b'i;;cd oilLIH: i ltailllllptioll Oat —Elie Ci Ly. 000n Cil
a))rovo :itafl•':; rcconum.nL,t.i.,ll Lo ,Illcnr! (!lu L'.irsl ych' ��!Iools.
.,c ;inn:; ru a llu: rc•rlul,v Jy SIC - ulec]
'file statC Coll f c1•ell('o all.l illy �.-,i_-•s---_•
M.R.P.A. conf:crencc::.—.--._-�_-•—
1983
TWO GREAT SCHOOLS
Sponsored By The
NATIONAL RECREATION & PARK ASSOCIATION
® EIGHTH ANNUAL PARK PLANNING & MAINTENANCE SCHOOL
0 FOURTH ANNUAL PART( & RECREATION SAFETY SCHOOL
"Aside from the line content of the courses, the
"A school such as this helps all those in attend-
school provides some excellent opportunities to
ante live up to the title of professional".
share hands-on experiences and explore solu-
Bcrf "Sonny"Slipolcovich
tions to common problems".
P
Harvey, Louisiana
JoAnne Baker
Rockford, Illinois
"The topics are timely, appropriate and the r
information is specific. You can lake it back
"PersonsinaresponsibleposilioninPBRservice
home and use it".
should be required to take this course to bolter
David 0yrd NAI "A1fMA"
a
educate themselves and broaden their know -
Waverly, Florida
ledge for better service to the public'.
9
Emidio DiBonodotto
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
NATIONAL RECREATION E PARK ASSOCIATION
NON-PROFIT ORG.
U.S. POSTAGE
P.O. Box 6900
PAID
Colo. Spgs., CO 90994
Colo. Spgs.. CO
PERMIT N0.9e2
11R BRUCE K ANDERSOtJ
DIN OF PFdtKS REC '< FORESTRY
CITY OF MDUND`a 'JJEW
'4G1 HIGH14AY 10
110U1,:1)S yrrt.l NN 'i',rII2
A RECOGNIZED PROFESSIONAL TRAINING PROGRAM
751
D i..7. r \ r i r ' i i r J r L '�" lM .: '•. t .f.
'fWO GREAT SCHOOLS SPONSORED BY THE
/NN\I P
THE 8th ANNUAL
PARK PLANNING AND MAINTENANCE SCHOOL
COLOr1ADO SPRINGS, CO
FIRST YEAR COURSL• CURRICULUM
During Ilia 4 days of school, the first year delegate will be
exposed to the principles involved In site selection; design;
and construction. At Iho same time, various steps believed to
be helpful in building a well-rounded park ampluyce will be
presented.
Motivation
Irrigation Systems
Management a Administration of Contracts
Planning, Design and Silo Selection (Simple)
Conservation of Natural Areas
Concrete
Playground Construction
Soils d Fertilizers
Park Lighting
Paints and Stains
Public Relations
Signs
Use of Wood In Structures
Integrated Pest Management
a ...... ...I Iwr
Auawnn
AUGUST21.24, 19113
SECOND YEAR COURSE CURRICULUM"
The second year 4-day course will concern itself mainly with
the maintenance of Park and Recreation facilities; developing
maintenance programs; development of altiludes towards the
environment, preventative maintenance; and the development
of good planning skills.
Maintenance and Construction of Athletic Fields
TO Maintenance Program (Sample)
mower maintdnnnce Program
Trao Maintenance Program
Saltily, Supervision, and Propor Use of Tools
Prevontntive Maintenance
Trail Maintenance
Wildlife Conservation in Parks
Maintenance Pmclic un I a 2
Motivation
�v(till
4
• •(Only Mesa Who Lem Conplehhl Ilia I1131 year eouno will be aeeomladl
GRADUATES INSTITUTE"'
The Graduates' Inslituto is designed to keep those who have completed the two year course curriculum in tune with the
latest solutions to problems lacing Ilse field and Ilse development of skills to improve one's managerial abilities.
Site Planning
Revenue Facility Site Planning
Parks in Perspective to Community Comprehensive Firms
Contract Maintewnce/A Casa Study
Management Styles Assessment
Park Planning Proclicum
Motivation
Landscape Construction
Palk Planning and klainlennncu Liability
*"(Only ihose who have graduated bom Ilia a[haol may sign ua for too Insteure I
oprOdAtEs sherilp �P
(Sample of
Certificate to
be Awarded)
KEYNOTER In addition to his Keynote Address, Dr. Tyson will also leach
DONALD R. TYSON, Ph.D. two hours on Motivation to both 1st and second year classes
DIRECTOR OF FIELD SALES and a two hour class on Management to the Graduate students.
TRACOM CORPORATION
DENVER, COLORADO
The Park Planning ant: Maintenance School is a Iwo -year oducation program, planned and sponsored by ilia National Recreation
and Park Association. II is Iho purpose of Ilse school to bring to those who are responsible for maintaining, developing, and planning
Park and Itocroation facilities, ihn latest techniques and methodology being used in Ihu field.
EX) RAS:
Tours —Four separate lours will be offered on Sunday August
21sl, two in the morning and two in the afternoon. Delegates
may select one morning and one afternoon lour. I hay are as
follows: MORNING: Tour (A) Garden of the Gods Park and
the White House Ranch "Living History" program. Tour (B)
The U.S. Olympic Training Canter and the facilities at Mom -
oriel Park which includes an Ice Rink and an Indoor Swim-
ming Pool. AFTERNOON —Tour (A) Behind Ilia scones lour
of the United States Air Force Academy facilities. (0) Behold
Iho scenes tour of the Cheyenne Mountain Zoo nsd ilia Bear
Creek Nature Canter. (Tours tiro part of Delegates and
Spouse packages.)
'pouse Progril spouse program for family members
accompanying the delegates has been planned. The spouse
package price Includes Sunday's Tours, ilia Chuckwagon
Supper Monday evening and Ilia Wednesday evening
Banquet, along with visits to the old mining town of Cripple
Crook and a lour of Ilia famous Molly Kmhleun mists. A
thrilling ride on Ilia Cable Car to Ilia lop of Manilou Mountain,
along with visits to Iho Musoum of Mining and Industry; a Iml,
through Looart Press (Curt(••• ...d shopping in Cotentin,
Chuckwagon Supper —At the Flying' W' Ranch, where you will
visit the Old West Town and sea a Western Show. (Part of
Delegates and Spouse packages)
Banquol—Tho closing event on the last evening where those
who have completed the second year course will be grad-
uated with the presentation of diplomas, and first year dele-
gates will receive their certificates. (Part of Delegates and
Spouse packages)
Exhlblts-An exhibition of the latest equipment being used
in the field will be on display. (Part of Delegates package)
Families Invlted--This school has always been a family affair
for many delegates. A spouse program is always planned and
extra tickets to all events can be purchased for all members
of the tinnily.
PARK & RECREATION SAFETY SCHOOL
® — THE ONLY ONE OF ITS KIND —
COLORADO SPRINGS, CO AUGUST 25.26, 1969
r
SAFETY SCHOOL COURSE CURPICULUM
Human Element —Recognizing accident problems;
accident costs; special problems.
• Personal 6 Protective Systems —Controlling hazards;
maintaining employee health; understanding shuck
hazards.
Legal Aspocls—Ills taw; case history; liabilities.
Park Safety Audlis—!dontifying problem areas and con-
cerns and how to conduct a safety audit and establish
and sell a snfely program.
...reoFco�..
Idea Swap Shop
(Semple of
Certificate to
be Awarded)
0 .x. 9
"The quality of the information was excellent"
Juralo Mazoika
Unalaska, Alaska
"Information and experience gained at this school has
been most helpful and provides n means of keeping
abreast of other agencies across the nation, as I look
for Innovative methods to meet the challenges which
confront me."
Garry E. Of?
Santa Ana, California
ABOUT THE SCHOOL
The Park and Recreation Safety School is sponsored
by Ilia National nocroatioll and Park Association which,
along with the National Safety Council, certifies those
who complete the course. Certificates of completion as
shown will be presented to those who attend.
The Safely School Course is designed to leach those
who nttend the school how to conduct "safety audits" In
parks, offices, maintenance garages and recreaticn
hrcilities, and how to organize n safely program for their
departments.
The Safely School is planned to immediately follow the
ever -popular Park Planning and Maintenance School, to
enable those delegates from out of state to slay two extra
days and complete the safely school course.
"A good'nuts and bolts'school for professionals at all
levels —certainly worth your time:"
Tim Wells
Lender, Wyoming
"It is hard to believe that a school could be so good,
overall two years in a row. Very well thought out class
arrangement. Topics followed each other very well."
John Burka
Farmers Branch, Texas
"An excellent opportunity to keep up with ilia (rend of
the times and share experiences under creative and
dynamic leadership,"
Dr. Evelyn Nirmne
Brookline, Massachusetts
AN EXCITING ONE -WEEK SCHEDULE
SUNDAY
MONDAY
TUESDAY
WEDNESDAY
S
THURSDAY
FRIDAY
ImAaamru
aE
emAAlem Aa
MENTAIM
IE / mAa
emµ
8AM•12 NOON
6AM-12 NOON
M
IMAM
T
[wGt
tom
EODUNIF
D
Wrvnrq taxi
Cyxxlux wx..
Im
LI.:::xllla
s
.L 1'M.a
EDUCATIONAL
EDUCATIONAL
H
K.WI
reUl ul auewaw
ICAU"Ix
xrnuttAWIIF$$
am Au.am Aa
wm AM wilAu
IOm to AK All
enux
A
SESSIONS
SESSIONS
N
W11e M1.0 I1r,N
alUx
tumxx
C
I
N
N/(x
roan telex"u
ai2AA4RmN�
I0XALLaWIkIA
aDIY,1mNv,
FaJUflawl
r
eAvwa Gnu,!
[a,f.Allarµ
fax.1tlgUl
G
iI
5I5510N5
Y.SSgNS
5[S:Iaa
I
n r
T
al++I onvw e.nl
M1u4,aw0.n1
M1awn Unhw a.^I
M1,x<n enwxll..q
ILun, On Yua 0-4
ILx On Yaw O.^7
A
F
ImAI
Imwaww
Imwamw
Imwamw
1PM-5:00 PM
IPM-5:00 PM
AETYYgallalll$
(a11('JIpNµ
lUlGllalµ
Ia1GlxY14
Y
T
a,wraxsww
sESYONz
aFsvaa
sFssroNs
EDUCATIONAL
EDUCATIONAL
E
inn
smruamw
smluamu
smwa»w
SESSIONS
SESSIONS
R
tolnlAlus raw
alUx
WFM
WW
N
Smlusmlu
srlusmw
smrusmw
S
5.6-30 PM
CERTIFICATES
0
raellN0.0—IA'A"AA,
EaxAnaul
cwutpvulslsYlva
Ewutwlwus.aar.
EXHIBITORS'
PRESENTED
O
SOOW HIhn Gab
:a$Yala
A110 CalwFM YIpW
MmlWµ [vALWnaI
n
N
v
H
SOCIAL
smw
emw-.w.. r4wra
V
Iwnaluw
rryxa •M rWxN
rwemw
0
'
amru-N„"IbA
FREE
FREE
FREE
N
FREE
Ai1M
Q
1
Wxwe
N
a.r.,.,,
L
G
HOTEL RESERVATION FORM
Complete this form and return to: Four Seasons Molor Inn, 2806 S. Circle. Drive, Colorado Springs, Colorado 80906
,or,(303) 576.5900. (Cut•ofl data for blocked rooms will be August 10, 1983)
r Vrival Dale _ Departure. Dale. _ phnno r i
Name
City _
Please reserve
rrrraor
—_ Address
Stale _ Zip.`
NATIONAL RECREATION AND PARK ASSOCIATION
.—mum(s): Single $JO.W__Double $56.00
$10.00 Extra for Poolsido Rooms. Children tinder 10 years of ago —No extra charge.
Roservations will hit cancollod at 0:00 p.m. Wass guarantood. [wish to guarantee: Cradil Card
_•_____________________________Ca-
____________--_-_-_rd N
..___-_._-_.-
PARK PLANNING & MAINTENANCE SCHOOL
REGISTRATION FORM
Name
Address
Enter me in the
I Prefer:
Tillo
City
_ Phone(—)
Slate Zip
1st yr. ❑ 2nd yr. ❑ Graduates Institute ❑
Sunday Morning Tour ❑ (A) Garden of the Gods & White House Flanch
- - (Choose One) ❑ (B) U.S. Olympic Training Center & City Park Facilities
Sunday Afternoon Tour ❑ (A) Air Force Acaderny & Planetarium """
(Choose One) ❑ (B) Cheyenne Mln. Zoo (Behind the scenes [our) & Dear Crock Nature Center
I will be accompanied to the school by
EXTRA tickets:
family members and will need the following
Flying "W' Supper & Bus @ $15.00 each adult .............
Flying "W" Supper & Bus @ $12.00 each child under 8 yrs... . ...... . ........ .
Tour Tickets @ $1.00 cacti ............... . . . . . . .
Banquet Tickets @ $15.00 each ....... , .
Spouse Program @ $00-Vu each (Includes 4 days of tours, banquet, Chuckwagon
Dinner & all transportation and entrance Ices) ...
REGISTRATION FEE: N.R.P.A. Member ❑ $120.00 ....................
CARD NUMBER
NON-N.R.P.A. Member ❑ $165.00 ....................
(Registration Fee includes Flying "W", all lours, and Banquet) TOTAL $
I will will not need transportation to the Flying "W".
I will will not need transportation to Equipment Show (Tuesday afternoon).
'Deduct $7.00 it transportation is not needed.
"Cost includes both morning and afternoon lours.
PARK&RECREATIONSAFETYSCHOOLREGISTRATION FORM
Application
Nama _ Title Phone (—) -
Address '--" -- —
City Slate Zip
NRPA Member Registration Foe .......... $ 05.00
NON-NRPA Member Registration Fee ..... $130.00
My NRPA Membership Card 0 is
MAKE SURE THAT THE
HOTEL FORM IS RETURNED
DIRECTLY TO:
THE HOTEL
TOTAL $
Make all checks payable to N.R.P.A. and
return to: P.O. Box 6900
Colorado Springs, CO 80934
Final date for Registration —
August lZ 1983
Everyone must pro-rogistur
NO REFurm AFTER THIS DATE I
12
CITY OP MOUNDS VIEW
CITY CUUNCIL
AGENDA SESSION
AuquaL 1, 19113
7;00 p.m.
1. Considerat•.ion of staff mo:moranclum regardinq Miller
Preliminary plat and Wetland Alteration Permit.
2. Consideration of memorandum regarding SRA Assessment.
3. Considerat•ion of memorandum regarding 1984 Budget
Personnel Issues (material distributed July 22nd).
4. 1984 Capital Request Prioritization (material handed
out in July 18th packet).
q&" /
MEMO T0: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Director of. Public Works/Commun-ity Development
DATE: July 28, 1983
SUBJECT: PERMITFOR IYMILPLAT
LERAND
INDUSTRIAL PA Rpl�l'ION
Attached are the following items:
1) Copy of letter from Mounds View to Mr. Miller dated 9/15/83.
2) Copy of alteration permit application report submitted by
Mr. Miller.
Per 4/15/83 letter and 4/11/83 action by City Council, Mr. Miller was
given 120 clays to complete final plat process. The 120 days expire
9, 1983 (if May and July which have 31 days are counted) or
August
August 1, 1983 if time is measured in months.
The attached material is the first submission received fromsucllicant
since 4/11/83. The submission was received 7/28/
83 and as has
not been formally reviewed by staff.
The following issues need to be resolved:
1) Delineation of wetlands in project area.
2) What wetland alteration is necessary for use of property?
3) What additional data is necessary to complete permit
review.
4) Should final plat be approved by August 9, 1983?
5) Should Planning Commission review application?
RECOMMENDATION:
EN�ATION'
1) Receive applicant's reNurtand direct sreviewodatalon
wetland alteration, on, iew
data on wetland c) squestions,
plan to Planning Commission
for continent.
2) Grant extension to final plat submission
and deadlinentinput
afford adequate time to Completereview plat.
on development issues near prop
osed
ici/bc
Attachments
!9
Of 04h S I0W
•,•..1I 1 11 A4NNL'IOIA
.Ini n .i i;yAs III
r.f I; a hl q; V IY.VI, MINN. 5'v 11'1
:114 :111Y.
April 15, 19113
Mr.. John Miller
Attorney at Law
4725 Rxcol.si.or tlivd.
Minneapolis, MM 55,116
Dear Mr. Mi 1..1er.:
'1'hi.s letter i.s to Cunlirm That. nn April 11., 1983, the City
Council granted extensirni of the eonr;idcrati.on of the prelimi-
nary plat for Miller inllu:;la:i,al N111. l.ucu l:cd within the City of
Mounds View. I'h3.:; mean:, Oat you have 120 days from the April
3.1, 1983 date to comp.l.ete montinq the requirements of 1) executing
a devolopmcnt ayrecment, '1) cuculviny drainage issues to conform
with Chapter 49A, and 3) ra:ol.vc wol.land alteration issues -as it
relates to the proposed four lot subdivision.
I1. was also indicated at the City Council meeting that you should
submit- as soon as practical to the CiLy your detailed request as
it relates to redclineation of the wetland boundary and/or altera-
tion of said boundary for your proposed project. The material to
be submitted should include, but not be limited to, the following
i. tcnas :
1) Area and amount of dredy,iny to Lake place.
2) Area and amount of f.i.l.ling to take place.
3) Area and amount of vegetation to be altered.
4) LOCaLion and size of pond.ing areas to be installed
5) Location of disposal of excavated materials.
6) InformaLion addressing all ten items listed in
ChapLur 40.0G, .Gubd.iv.isi.on 4, subparagraph D.
It is understood by the CiLy of Mounds View that your are going
to process the f.i.na.l pl:.11: for four lot:, of your proposed subdivi-
sion coextensively with your application for alteration of the
wetland on your property. It is understood that several of the
items necessary for reaching a determi.nation of wetland alteration
Mr. Miller K
Page 2
April 15, 1983
permit will be items necessary for approving the final plat for
the proposed four lots of your f.i.rr.t phase.
I will be out of town through April. 24th, so if you have any
questio.ns•concerning this; matter, plcase contact Mr. Don paulcy
at the City of Mounds View.
Sincerely,
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
John C. Johnson, Director
Public Works/Community Development•
JCJ/bc
cc: Don paulcy, Clerk -Administrator.
k, �L
MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council
P ` FROM: Clerk -Administrator
DATE: July 22, 1983r
SUBJECT: SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY ASSESSMENT
As alluded to in my July 25, 1983 Administrative Newsletter,
the Suburban Rate Authority proposes to levy an assessment
in 1984 to all members equal to $245/vote or, in the case of
Mounds View, $735. Prior to discussing the stated need for
the assessment or value of our membership in this organization,
I would like to review the organization's history for the new
Councilmembers.
The Suburban Rate Authority was organized on May 1, 1963 to
enforce the rate provisions of franchises its members granted
to the Minneapolis Gas Company. In January, 1975 the Authority
was reorganized into a state-wide organization with its staffed
purpose being to participate on behalf of its members in the
regulating processes of the Minnesota Public Utilities
Commission (PUC).
Since its reorganization in 1975 the Authority has not needed
to levy an assessment to its members because of a substantial
reserve it developed from franchise fees paid by the Minneapolis
Gas Company. The By -Laws of the organization provide the
authority for an assessment when it is determined to be necessary.
The Authority presently has a balance of cash and investments of
$47,000 which would not fund its activities through 1984 even if
there are no major rate cases before the PUC. At the present
time it is anticipated that the first major rate case from
Northwestern Bell (NWB) since the recent reorganization of the
Bell system will go before the PUC before the end of this year.
This office has received information during our budgetary process
that NWB could be proposing rate increases up to 80% for resi-
dential customers.
Except for the PUC staff there is no other organization that
regularly intervenes in these rate hearings to dispute the rate
requests from the public utilities serving our area. The value
of the SRA is that they serve as a "watch dog" agency in a very
specialized area representing the interests of our citizens at
a time when utility rates seem to be in an uncontrollable upward
spiral. The cost of a $735 assessment to the City is minute in
relationship to the cost of utility rates we could be paying
were it not for the activities of organizations such as the
u Suburban Rate Authority.
.i
-2-
Recommendation: Authorize staff to include the $735 assessment
in the 1984 Budget under Account No. 100-190-4J61, City Hall -
Memberships.
DFP/pf
1;
DATE APPROVED: ,July 25, 1983
PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA
Regular Meeting
July 11, 1983
Mounds View City Hall
2401 Hwy. 10, Mounds View, MN 55112
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Mounds View City Council was called to order by 1. Call to Order
Mayor McCarty at 7:32 PM o❑ July 11, 1983.
ME14BERS PRESENT: Councilmembers Blanchard, Doty, 2. Roll Call
.ancner, LiEke and Mayor McCarty.
ALSO PRESENT: City Attorney Meyers, Clerk/
Administrator Pauley and Public Works/Community
Development Director Johnson.
Motion/Second: Doty/Linke to approve the .Tune 27, 3. Approval of
19 minutes as corrected. Minutes:
June 27, 1983
5 ayes 0 nays
Motion Carried
Victor Loeffler, 5135 Greenwood Drive, stated he has 4, Residents Re -
two lots up for sale at 81st and Laport, and he has quests and
just found out they are part of the wetland Comments ftom
area, and asked what their status was, the Floor
Director Johnson explained that he had spoken with
Mr. and Mrs. Loeffler, and had explained the procedure
for obtaining a building permit, and getting a wetland
alteration permit. He also explained the problem
with the two lots, stating that the street is also
within the wetland, and the two lots are controlled
by both the flood plain and wetlands ordinances.
Attorney Meyers stated that Mr. Loeffler would have
to go through the process of applying for a permit,
and that there are several ordinances that regulate
the use of this land, He also advised that if a
permit cannot be issued, there is no provision for
reimbursement by the City.
Mr. Loeffler expressed his concern with finding a
buyer who may sue later, if he finds the lots are
not buildable, Attorney Meyers advised that Mr.
Loeffler not surpress any information about the lots
to prospective buyers.
Carol Seidenkranz, Student Services Coordinator for
the Mounds View Public Schools, stated that she has
Mounds View City Council July 11, 1983
Regular Meeting Page Two
----------------------------------------------------------------------
applied for two grants, and has just been informed '
that she needs an official government sponsor. She
explained the purpose of the two grants and stated
that she does have a letter of endorsement from the
Youth Service Burcau, which she knows the City works
with. Ms. Seidenkranz emphasized that she does not
need any money from the City, just their sponsorship.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley advised that the school
district will take care of all the details, financial
records, and so forth, and the City's only obligation
would be to be the official sponsor. Ms. Seidenkranz
added that the City's responsibility would be to give
it's endorsement, and then, if the grants were forth-
coming, the City would receive the checks and turn
them over to the school district. She provided the
Council with copies of the grant applications, for
their review.
Councilmember Hankner stated that she has worked with
Ms. Seidenkranz, and feels she does an excellent job.
She stated that she would have no problem in sponsoring
the grant application.
Mayor Mcl�arty expressed concern with not knowing if any
funding would be available after the year was up, to
continue any programs that were started, and to continue
the salary of the two assistants who are to be hired.
Councilmember Hankner replied that that is always the
case with federal grants, that there is no guarantee
they will be continued.
Ms. Seidenkranz explained that none of the proposed
programs are new, and the assistants would help her
carry out existing programs.
Mayor McCarty questioned if the Youth Service Bureau
would step in at the end of the year, if further
funding was not available. Ms. Seidenkranz replied
that her job is short term, in that she provides
crisis intervention counseling, and refers anyone
on to the Youth Service Bureau who needs further
help.
Motion/Second: McCarty/Hankner to approve the City
of Mounds View as the sponsoring government unit for
the WHO
applications from the State of Minnesota,
for 1,000 and $33,000, naming Carol Seidenkranz as
the contact person at the Edgewood Community
Center.
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Caed
Mayor McCarty closed the reg, r meeting an(? opened 5. Public Nearing
the public hearing at 7:57 F.. Ord. No. 344
Mound, View City Council July 11, 1983
----
Regular Meeting; Page Three
--------------------------------------------------------
a Clcrk/Admini:;Lrator Pauley gave a brie[ explanrition
of Ordinance Nu, 344.
Attorney Meyers reviewed the request the City had
received for additional operating hours and reviewed
the requiremenLs of the ordinance.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley explained that Donatelle's
made the application, which, if approved, would grant
all licensed liquor establishments in the City the
additional hours. lie explained that an amendment
was made during the 1982 legislative session, allowing
two additional hours on Sunday.
Mayor McCarty closed the public hearing and reopened
the regular meeting at 8:01 PM.
Mayor McCarty asked that Item C be removed,
Clerk/Administrator Pauley asked that a statement
from John Johnson, in the amount of $1,563.75, he
added to Item H.
Motion/Second: McCarty/Doty to add the statement
or 5 7 from John Johnson.
5 ayes 0 nays
Motion/Second: McCarty/Linke to approve the consent
agaen a, minus Item C, and waive the reading of the
resolutions.
5 ayes 0 nays
Carol Crowi, 8330 Pleasantview Drive, stated that
regarding Item C, she and her husband are in opposition
of the installation of a street light. She explained
that while there was a robbery in the neighborhood,
none of tl;e neighbors leave lights on when they are out,
and the lots are extra deep, which provides a rear
entrance to the homes. She stated that five homes on
the block are up for sale, and she does not want her
taxes raised again by paying for the power for another
street light. She added that she already has the phone
box and electrical box and fire hydrant in her yard
and does not want a light pole added. She stated also,
that if it is put in across the street, it will bother
her family for sleeping.
Councilmember Doty explained that the City has a budget
each year for the installation of street lights. He
stated they must keep in mind the health, safety and
welfare of the neighborhood, and that a significant
number of residents had petitioned for that light.
Councilmember Hankner explained that in response to
6. Approval of
Consent AQe
Motion Carried
Motion
Mounds View City Council July 11, 1983
Regular Meeting Page Pour
----------------------------------------------------------
Mrs. Crowl's comments on tax increases, the major
increase for the past year was for the schools.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley informed the Council of
the possible locations for the pole.
Motion/Second: Doty/Hankner to approve Resolution
No. GJO, an change the address of the location
from 8320 to 8325 and from 8330 to 8335, and waive
the reading of the resolution.
5 ayes 0 nays
Mayor McCarty asked to return to the Residents Re-
quests portion of the agenda.
Jim Petrowski, 2708 County Road J, asked the status
of new Highway 10, as he has a considerable noise
problem on County Road J, and is having trouble
selling his home because of it. He added that he
had seen a news report on television, prioritizing
highway projects, and County Road J was not listed.
Director Johnson explained that earlier in the Spring,
District 5 of the Highway Department authorized and
signed the right of way documents to authorize the
acquisition of the necessary pieces of land. He
stated that further details are still being worked
out. He added that the City has informed the
Highway Department that this is a priority item for
the City, and they responded that it will be
prioritized in the Pall.
Councilmember Linke stated he has personally called
District 5 to put pressure on by letting them know that
there is strong local support for the improvement. Mayor
McCarty added that the City will write to MnDOT, voicing
their concern, and asking them to contact Mr. petrowski
directly with a response.
Motion Carried
4. Residents Re-
quests (Cont.)
Director Johnson stated he would call and get a
current update for Mr. Petrowski on priority status.
Motion/Second: Blanchard/Linke to approve the first1 1st Reading of
reading o Ordinance No. 344, an ordinance amending Ord. No. 344
the Municipal Code of Mounds View by amending Chapter
100, entitled "Intoxicating Liquors", and waive the
reading.
4 ayes 1 nay Motion Car 'ed
Councilmember Doty stated he had voted against the
motion as he feels enough liquor is sold all week
long.
Mounds View City Council
Regular Meeting
Mayor McCarty explained that he had contacted clergy-
men within the City, and their opinion was that it
was an individuals responsibility, and they did not
specifically object to the additional hours.
Councilmember Blanchard stated that she was in favor
of the additional hours, to allow the City businesses
to compete with surrounding communities.
Motion/Second: McCarty/Hankner to set a public hear-
ing for 7:40 PM on July 25 to consider the vacation
of the alley in Block 1, Iron Works Plat.
5 ayes 0 nays
Clerk/Administrator Pauley explained that Acting
Police Chief Smith was called out of town on
family business, and would be giving his report
on July 25.
Finance Director Brager reported the financial
statement had been completed, and the City has
taken advantage of some interest -bearing checking
accounts, and have worked on taking insurance
proposals and awarding insurance contracts, and
have started the first round in the budget, which
will carry through to the next quarter, and are
doing a special assessment debt study.
Finance Director Brager reported that for the
insurance program, they are going to have a firm
come in and look at the City's program and make
recommendations on modifications, with safety in
mind, which will reduce insurance costs. He
stated a report will be ready in about four weeks.
Finance Director Brager reported that a resident
had :ome in this morning and made a presentation
of money that was to be used for a special purpose,
drapes for the Clerk/Administrator's office. He
stated that a special fund had been set up, entitled
"RIPOFF". Mayor McCarty explained the money had
been donated at the City Dinner, in jest.
Park Director Anderson reported the 2nd quarter
had been their busiest, with Staff attending 42
evening meetings, and developing two City news-
letters, and spending a minimum of 30 hours a
week on the new word processor/micro computer.
He reported that in forestry, 24 crates of flowers
July 11, 1983
Page Five
Consideration
of Staff Memo
Regarding Blo
1, Iron Works
Plat, Alley
Vacation
Motion Carried
2nd Quarter
Department
Reports
Mounds View City Council July 11, 1983
Regular Fleeting Page Six
----------------------------------------------------------------------
were planted, along with 950 trees, with 75 trees
being designated as diseased.
Park Director Anderson reported interviews have been
proceeding for the part time aquatics instructor. He
also reported that a grant had been received for
Silver View Park, for $33,228, to do additional
landscaping, and that he hopes to be able to modify
it to do trail development.
Park Director Anderson reported a great deal of time
had gone into the Festival in the Park, which they
felt turned out great.
He reported there are currently 120 employees working
in the Park, Recreation and Forestry department,
including volunteers, and he has been very busy coor-
dinating all of them. Ile started he would like to
commend Mary Saarion for all her extra time put in,
as well as the whole staff in general..
Director Johnson reported that Staff is attempting to
pull together information for the Council on a golf
course.
He reported that 113 building permits were issued, 32
mechanical permits, 17 HRA inspections, 72 housing
unit inspections, 72 re -inspections, and 16 planning
applications were received, with revenue from the
building permits alone being al:•eady at 100% of what
was expected for the year, and the other areas being
at at least 50%.
He reported that Knollwood Green and the 8-unit condo-
miniums that Mary Anderson is building, will be part
of the Parade of Homes in August.
Director Johnson reported that Well #6, Treatment
Plant #3 and Treatment Plant #1 work has all been
completed. He reported the sewer department has
reviewed the footage and determined some repair work
is needed, with two emergency repairs already having
been done.
Director Johnson reported the street sweeping was
completed, and that 5 tons of tar have been put
into potholes. lie reviewed the LP conversion
status, and the training which has been completed
by employees, and the personnel hired.
Director Johnson reported that the water fund for
materials and supplies, will have an anticipated
overrun of approximately $3,000, with the original
budget being $5,934,
Director Johnson reviewed the hour•: completed to
date by himself, and the projects olved,
July 11, 1983
Mounds View City Council Page Seven
Regular Meeting ---------
----------------------------------------------
Councilmember Linke questioned who did the work on
Long Lake Road at Ardan Avenue. Clerk/Administrator
rov
Pauley replied that the County did, and that he will
informing them of the
be writing a letter to them,
poor quality.
Motion/Second: McCarty/Hankner to table the item 10.
Considerationt
of AmendmentContract
for further information and communication with
for
Mr. Johnson at the next agenda session.
Professional
Services with
5 ayes 0 nays
John Johnson
Motion Carried
Mayor McCarty stated that he felt they must define
the special projects before any action is taken. He
hold off on those
also advised Director Johnson to
projects until they are discussed further.
Councilmember Linke questioned whether restrictions 11.
Consideration
s Memo
could be put on the garage door size and style, and
door.
of
RegoWill
Rego dCU ingRe-
stated he would prefer a double, swinging
�_
Councilmember Hankner stated she had no problem with
quest a nd
Rslt. No. 1611
the type of door, as the width and height are the same.
Councilmember Blanchard reported the Planning Commission
has recommended that no driveway be allowed to the
building.
The Council reviewed Resolution No. 1617 and dis-
the Conditional
cussed enforcement of it, and whether
Use Permit should be carried on to subsequent owners.
Motion/Second: McCarty/Hankner to approve Resolution
D6. 1617, ana strike the fifth "Whereas", and waive
the reading.
Motion Carried
5 ayes 0 nays
Motion/Second: Linke/Blanchard to amend the previous
motion to add "Be it further resolved that no improved
or unimproved driveway will be allowed".
Motion Carried
5 ayes 0 nays
Clerk/Administrator Pauley explained why this item 12.
Consideration
of taff Memo
was on the regular age:.da, rather than the consent
Regarding Fran
agenda.
Vogt Minor
Director Johnson advised the Council that temporary
Subdivision anbuilding Rslt. No. 1628
pthe Lordinance eallows uhim fup toe60odays tton
only, and
Mounds View City Council July 11, i983
Regular Meeting Page Eight
----------------------------------------------------------------------
complete the work.
Motion/Second: Blanchard/Doty to approve the minor
subdivision -or Frank Vogt and approve Resolution
No. 1628 and waive the reading.
5 ayes 0 n:rys Motion Carri
Motion/Second: McCarty/Linke to authorize Staff to 13. Consideration
mow the property located at 5511 Quincy Street and of Staff Memo
submit a bill to the owner for labor and material Regarding a
costs and if the bill is not paid at the time taxes Public Nuisanc
are certified, the amount is to be levied on the at 5511 Quincy
property taxes. Street
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Director Johnson had no report. 14. Report of
Director of
Public Works/
Community Dvlp
Attorney Meyers had no report. 15. Report o
Attorney
Councilmember Blanchard reported she had received 16. Reports of
very firm input from all the Planning Commissioners, Councilmembers
that they would like to continue receiving both
Council minutes and agendas.
Councilmember Doty reported that he had been approached
by a resident who has a problem with two cats belonging
to a neighbor, in which the cats have the run of the
neighborhood and use his children's sandbox. He
stated the resident had talked to the Police Department,
but there is no ordinance regulating cats.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported that in looking
at the Code, the cats could not be described as wild,
and that two animals are allowed per household to be
kept or raised. He recommended that the resident
contact him, and they could have the CSO go over and
talk to him. He stated they could also contact the
Ramsey County Health Department.
Councilmember Blanchard reported the Planning
Commission is concerned with the delay in adopting
Chapter 40, as they are having a problem with
enforcement since it is in limbo.
Director Johnson replied that he and Attorney Meyers
have been working on coordin:r,.ing the next and maps,
.Mounds View City Council
Regular Meeting
----------------------------------------------
and it is a lower priority than other items.
Councilmember Doty stated he would like to have
the idea of a golf course examined. Clerk/Admini-
strator Pauley replied that it has been discussed
and Staff must look at the size factor and financial
feasibility of it.
Councilmember Blanchard stated that Bob Glazer had
done an extensive study at one time, and they should
check to see if his records are available.
Councilmember Nankner stated she would like to thank
all who were involved with the Festival in the Park,
with a special thanks going to Jan Quick, Clerk/
Administrator Pauley replied that a letter of
appreciation will be sent.
July 11, 1983
Page Nine
------------------
Mayor McCarty stated he had spoken with Festival Commissioners
and the Festivities Commission would like to have
the Festival critiqued as soon as possible. He
asked Clerk/Administrator Pauley to set up a joint
meeting with the Council and Festivities Commission,
for July 19.
.., Councilmember Linke reported he had sat in on some
of the interviews for Police Chief, and he feels there
is a good group of applicants.
Ile reminded the Council of the Ramsey County League
meeting on July 20, which is a picnic and tour, with
reservations due by July 15.
Mayor McCarty reported that on July 9 at 8:15 AM, he
was buzzed by a T33 jet with Air Force markings, and
stated he would like an inquiry made as to why their
aircraft was performing, using Runway 17 with no wind.
Mayor McCarty stated the sense of urgency for setting
goals and policies is increasing, and recommended
setting up a meeting to discuss it, as soon as possible.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley replied that the best time
to do it was right after the goal setting workshop
on August 31 and September 1.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported there is now 17, Report of
$42.73 in the drapery fund. Administrator
Motion/Second: Doty/Linke to adjourn at 9:33 PM. 18, Adjournment
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Respectfully submitted,
Donald F. Pauley
Clerk/Administrator