Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packets - 1983/08/22CITY COUNCIL MEETTNG CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW August 22, 1983 7:30 p.m. A G E N D A 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call - Doty, Linke, Hankner, Blanchard, McCarty 3. Approval of Minutes: August 8, 1983 (Regular Meeting) (Received in 8/15/83 packet.) 4. Public Hearing - 7:40 p.m. - Rezoning of 7801 Sunnyside Road from R-3 to B-2 5. Residents Requests and Comments from the Floor ------------------------------------------------ CITIZENS: BEFORE SPEAKING PLEASE GIVE YOUR FULL NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE MINUTES ------------------------------------------------ 6. Approval of Consent Agenda ITEM A. Reschedule September 5, 1983 Agenda Session for 6:00 p.m. on September 6, 1983 ITEM B. Schedule Budget Work Session for 7:00 p.m. on August 29, 1983 ITEM C. Approve Resolution No. 1645 Approving the Subdivision for Cross of Glory Lutheran Church ITEM D. Authorize Submittal of Staff Letter Regarding Used Vehicles at Northeast Marine ITEM E. Set Public Hearing for Rezoning and Conditional Use Permit for Flood Plain Filling by Dynamic Designers or. September 12, 1983 at 7:40 p.m. ITEM F. Licenses for Approval ITEM G. Approve Resolution No. 1646 Approving Just and Correct Claims Against City Funds -continued- AGRNDA August 22, 1983 Page Two 7. First Reading of Ordinance No. 333, Amending the Municipal Code of Mounds View by Amending Chapter 32 Entitled, "The Planning Commission" 8. First Reading of Ordinance No. 334, Amending the Municipal Code of Mounds View by Amending Chapter 43 Entitled, "Mobile Homes" 9. Consideration of Memorandum from Director of Parks, Recreation and Forestry Regarding Hiring of Part -Time Aquatics Coordinator A. Approve Resolution No. 1644 Approving Joint Powers Agreement with the Mounds View School District and the City of Mounds View for Guidelines Relating to the Position of Aquatics Coordinator for the City of Mounds View B. Adopt Memorandum of Understanding Between the City of Mounds View and Ms. Maureen Thielen outlining Duties of the Part -Time Aquatics Coordinator r 10. Consideration of Memorandum from Director of Parks, Recreation and Forestry Regarding One -Ton Dump Truck Bids i 11. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding Federal Cable TV Legislation 12. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding Fridley Hazardous Waste Sice 13. Report on Meeting in Mankato Concerning MSA Unencumbered Construction Funds and MnDOT Report of Proposed Resurfacing Project (Material will be banded out Monday.) 14. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding 1983 Sealcoat Project and Authorization to Advertise for Bids (Material will be handed out Monday.) 15. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding Hiring a Consultant to Review Wetland Issues Raised Per Miller Industrial Park Proposal (Material will be handed out Monday.) 16. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding Programmed Land Final Plat �'J AGENDA August 22, 1983 Page Three 17. First Reading of Ordinance No. 346, Amending the Municipal Code of Mounds View by Amending Chapter 41 Entitled, "Specific Rczonings" 18. Consideration of Staff Recommendation Regarding Receptionist Position (Material will be handed out Monday.) 19. Report of Director of Public Works/Community Development 20. Report of Attorney 21. Report of Councilmembers - Doty, Linke, Hankner, Blanchard, McCarty 22. Report of Administrator 23. Adjournment ■ MEMO TO: Clerk -Administrator and (:Ity con tit: fl FROM: Engineering/Planning Technician DATE: August 17. 1983 SUBJECT; BAYERROIILER UEH LOPMENT The Planning Commission at their August 3, 1983 regular meeting reviewed a request by Mr. Gordon Bayerkohler to rezone the existing 4-unit residential building at the corner of Sunnyside Road and lilghway 10 from R-3 to II-2. The planning Commission recommended approval by adopting Resolution No. 91-83 (copy attached). Also attached are the following items relating to this proposal: I) Staff report 2) Staff memorandum dated July 22, 1983 3) Letter from Mr. Bayerkohler 4) Planning Commission minutes of August 3, 1983 (unapproved) 5) Site plan Staff has prepared Resolution No. 1643 approving the Planning Case and Ordinance No. 346 for your review. A final landscape plan was not available for inclusion with this packet but will be available from the applicant at the meeting. To date, staff has not received a permit from Rice Creek Watershed District approving this proposal. The developer missed the August 12th deadline to submit materials for District Board approval on August 24th. The next board meeting where approval could be granted would be September 28th since they only meet once a month. The developer is asking that the City Council approve their proposal at this time contingent upon approval by the Rice Creek ff at the oftevents taker place ifathe rCouncil dhas hno concerns regarding sequencewing regardingthe proposed rezoning request. 1) August 22 - Council approves the development request (Resolution No. 1643) and conducts a first reading u on an ordinance to rezone (ordinance No. 346). ed til ty staff eceives 2) The second notification efrom gstaff is eofyRice nCreek iWatershed rDistrict that approval by the District Board will begive. Should the Council elect to wait for their approval until approval from the Rice Creek Board is given on September 28th, construction would not be able to start until the the end of November which is too late in the hhseason to start construction on the parking, g and storage area proposed. August I7, 1983 Page Two 3) At the Connell meetinli whir.h fallow$ the (1ate. when City staff receives notification from Rice Creek Watershed District, the second reading of the ordinance and approval of resolution to execute the development agreement would take place. 4) Thirty days following publication, the rezoning would officially take effect and construction would begin. (C)nstruction may be possible to begin following (Aevelopment agreement execution although the possiblllty may exist that the rezoning may stiLI be subject to further review and possible denial during and following the thirty day period). Should any of the Councilmembers have questions regarding the above items, please contact me Friday or Monday. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution No. 1643 and conduct first reading of Ordinance No. 346 if the Council has no objection to the proposed rezoning and development. FJK/bc r l_ Attachments W CASE: 131-83 ITEM: Rezoning (It-T to 5-2) Variance (Side dP Setback) (Reduced I'arkinl; Sparc::) APPLICANT: Cordon 9nyerknh1rr LOCATION: UnL Suuuyside Road SUMMARY 06 RP.OURST See attached letter which describes this revised request. The previous; request proposed to rezone the property to an R-0, Residential OfIlea nLStrIct, which would have required both a side yard setback variance and conditional use permit approval. The applicant has since withdrawn this previous request. PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS 1. Existing zoning on the property is R-3, Medium Density Residential. 2. Comprehensive Plan denotes the area as being Nigh Density Residential. 3. The applic4-nt unit is requesting a itresidential building nentirely to annofficevert 11e existingting building. 4. Setbacks: a) Front and rear setbacks have been met. b) The existing building is located [en feet from the cast property line. Setback requirements for R-3 (the present use and zoning of the building)is 20 feet when it abuts another residential lot. The setback requirement for B-2 buildings (proposed use) is also 20 feet when it abuts a residential lot. The existing setback for both the present use (R-3) and proposed use (8-2) does not meet Code requirements. By changing the zoning and use of the existing structure, a continuance of the non -conforming setback is being requested. This would require a variance to continue the non -conformity. It should be noted that the variance request is not as a result of an action by the applicant. A non -conformity exists whether the building remains as an R-3 or whether it is converted to offices (B-2). 5. There are no minimum lot width and area requirements for B-2 uses. n 6. Parking - The site plan shows 18 parking spaces, whereas, the Zoning Code requires 20 spaces. A variance of 2 parking spaces is required. Spaces shown measure 9-1/2 x 20 feet, meeting existing Code requirements. CASK 171-87 1'nge Two 7. The Zoning Code does not require screening of adjacent resi- dential properties although the City may want to consider screening of the proposed parking int and the existing building from surrounding residential uses. 8. Chapter 49A ponding requirements: The applicant's revised drainage plan has addressed all the concerns previously presented by staff. The plan proposes to iiso existing drainage swalc easterly of building to outlet ponding area. The existing $wale will be regraded lower to provide positive drainage outlet. Staff recommends relocating the pond outlet structure to near Highway 10 right-of-way line no that all of the site building, Lawn and parking runoff will be controlled. The relocation will also allow the drainage Swale to function as part of pond storage area. Applicant will need Rice Creek Watershed District permit. It is also suggested that the drainge pond and Swale be covered by drainage easement. If drainage Swale work extends into Highway 10 right-of-way then a Pin DOT permit will be necessary. t M IMI, IINYI ��(L 1 _ iI�J� �NCK� f0ywoll �m .iy PV'ut •_0 1 . �� � +..�,� I �� _ I 1 I I 1 P.MN. PII M Yn/0 inl {j7 I M rN YM ywy. 1ilv'r..�Ml 0l0• I 11 u ul.• I�YI I 1 • I I I 3 1. I w • w .o. vw - I - •a.wY_� n. NM. (14 YpI Y! P'M1. Q 4. s„�YPIOt sM cPnn Yeu .I• IIYcxIu •Al '"' I AFEA or PRoPoS�D RMNIN4 R�quF�T 0 4 Silver Lak W A , Roada , 1 61 too] /�n h `�n y N \ .41 41 0 ( ••A � � 252 � sz N CD � y 7870 � 7876 7886 00 7877 700 7hl J / 10 p , .I*aS1 Od p Road ' 1 JJ jtj 70Gb 98ro 7B10 789 7 iBbG i� MY 7775 7755 77Iol 77V 7001 7801 78/5 7B'i/ 785/ 78G7 W N n N • L . district 6 CoMPRF�r✓si✓� P�Aq/ proposed land use LD Low density residential MD Medium density residential M D/T Medium density - trailer park H D High density residential NC Neighborhood commercial HC Highway commercial IND Industrial S School C Church. P Park/public facility A 183 .*)i-f L [Ciq Iol,) natural features* Flood plain/metro area ._a designated wetlands iUIR Sleep slopes Tree massing *Approximate locations - subject to detailed review at time of proposed development r, R-2 .. .... ... . B-3 f , B-3 L AM Ft . . 3 3 - B 3 113 Rr�3-3 R"2 13-3 B-1 B.3 a•2 03 R B-3 i i' B-1 B-3 R:2 n-2 B-3 B,2'-'B ill p3 i, B-3 . R 3 0 03 R:1 7 -xisting Zoning R-1 silvile rainily B,2 Roo Business R-2 Tworumoy B,3 ce.,%crci Business R, 3 Genc-al Res;dmte Lighl Indwiriul BI Limiled Business fjX joliq 52 B -73 R-3 B\.-J L-01 �1� A' •3 AIR .I Zoning Ordinance Zoning AL AZ3 v.b arvrtaav Administration I'elh,gn the aura impul. 1.1111 1),Irt of the lolling plo. cess, and the part of great• esl interest to the individual p llullog commissioner, is in the adolinistl.11ion of the inning ordimince. At tale sine time, this part tends to be the weakest link in the whole pl.lorling pro. cess, and the place where the planning process of. ten breaks down, This is because many planning commissioners and local officials tend to issue an inordinate number of variances and zoning amend- ments. fart of the reason for [his is Ibe "prt,-I;ruwlh" In "pnr•develupmcrll" allilude Oil the pan of malty local officials and planning commission members. with this type of attitude, it is easy to justify bending the rules a little and to issue vari• aulces and aunendnlents al practically every request. A second reason is the wish to remain popular with the citizens of the community. It is difficult at limes and often unpopular to stick to the rules, especially if the request for a variance comes from a local citizen. It should be remembered, however, Ihal once it request for a variance is issued h) one individual, it will set a precedent for others, includ- ing large developers if the circumstances arc the sane. A third reason is simply ,I lack of knowledge of how the different adolirlislralive devices are sup- posed to be used, As will be indicated below, from a legal and procedural point of view, [here arc sig. nificant differences between such administrative devices as variances, conditional use permits and tuning anlendnlcn[s, Thus, it is likely that many communities arc using these devices illegally which weakens the whole zoning process and leaves the C0II1IIInlllty Open IO Ieg,11 challenges by developers and land owners, A. AIIMINISTRATIVEnEYIEES I OR MAKING ZONING MORE FLEXIBLE There are three major administrative devices avail• able to a community to change the zoning ordi. nance and to make zoning more flexible - zoning mnenJNienrs, eadalrces, and special use permits. Although there are significant differences between these devices, they have often been confused by laymen and professionals alike. The unfortunate result has been that the whole planning process has suffered; and in some cases, the zoning process has Woken down entirely. It cannot be emphasized enungh that it is very important for a community to follow the correct zoning procedures. Many communities in the past have learned the hard way the results Of oat following the correct procedures and have lost important challenges in the courts to their zoning decisions, with this in mind, the fol. lowing is an explanation of these various adminis- trative devices. Zoning Amendment (Rezoning) A� The main purpose of the zoning amendment is to allow the community to change the zoning ordi. nance or map. There are two basic types of a. mendments. One is a zoning map amendment or a change in the geographical area of a zoning district which is also popularly known as rezoning. The other is a change in the zoning text, or changes in what is permitted in a particular zoning district. There are it number of reasons why a commit. 'illy may want to amend the zoning ordinance, One is to reflect a significant and unanticipated re i Change in the community brought about Illrough rapid chanl;rs in Irdlit 4ogy, or Ur ball tivyrloplllellI or social bchaviol. In today's rapidly changing; wvmld, it is visually impossible to predict future devclupmcnl beyond a 5-I0•year period with any degree of accuracy. Thus, it is recognized by most punning prolessiorals Ihat the Comprehensive plan Should be upda4ed al least every 3.5 years to re- flect these ehaliges. Since zoning should be based on the comprehensive pun, file ordinance should Ile amended when the contprehcosit'r plan is up. dated. A second reason is to reflect changes in policy by lie community. This may come ;Ibout in a variety of different ways. For example, certain pldllnlmg policies ,Ind prograins may not be bring- ing about the desired goals which may uecessilatc a change in development politics. or development in adjacenl communities ntay affect the cummu- nily in such a way ;u to require changes in develop. "lent policy. For example, a stale or county high. way department stay Mainline to locale a major highway through or adjacent to a cunununily which (obviously will have a substantial effect on development. A third reason is to correct mistakes which were ')tilde at the time the comprehensive plan or zoning ordinance was developed and adopted. In most punning programs, minor errors will often he made which are overlooked at the time of adopting ilia cunglrchensive plan or zoning ordinance. 'fo correct these errors, flu zoning amendment pro- cedure would be applicable. Finally, rezonings (or changes in district lines) are often desired and appropriate in "staged growth" plans which ')take use of "holding zones." For example, a typical holding zone in a slagccl growth pun may he a relatively large area designa. led for agriculture. It is recognized that itsgruwlh nmves out in the rural areas that some of these agricultural areas will be re•zonecl for residential or commercial uses at such time that utilities can be extended pr. services provided lu bring about order. ly development. It should be noted that the staged growth approach has not yet been tested in the courts in. Minnesota although this approach to punning has been upheld in the highest court in New York State. 1-1a6ing discussed generally the rationale and GJ ti Ihcmy lug ronin!;,unendmenls, list)p:t.l ;nharca,. dl-.111w; wall nmiol; anu:udmrnl•, nerd l" liscus sod al lullher Icnglh. one is spnl zuuinl; ut:I the �I other Is down) zoning, Spot zoning. Spot zoni•:g has been defined as Ilia rezoning of a single parLcl of land or a rrlalive. ly small area for higher intensity use than the land surrounding ilia particular parcel of land. Usually Spot zoning involves a single parcel of land singled out lot special and prisilrl;cd Ire,itmcnl primarily for the benefit of the landowner and not in accord with the comprehensive plan. For example, the rezoning of a single parcel of land in a residential area fur commercial or industrial uses which are not compatible will, the surrounding land uses or in confnralance with Ilia comprehensive plan is ueedly held by the courts to Ire illegal in 111.11 it anunulls to spot zoning. In the absence of a crrm- prehcnsive pun, it is more difficult to determine whether a particular rezoning amounts to spot zoning. Spot zoning usually results when the local of. fici.ls are ton liberal in the granting of requested lulling amendments. 'there may be many reasons why a property owner may want it rezoning or t.,. Mining ,unendmenl, some of which arc legitinhale but some of which are not, in relation to the com. munity planning process. For example, a property owner may want a rezoning to enhance the oppor. II1111Ucs of selling his land, or to gain ,a competitive, lucaliunal advantage with a business enterprise, even though the proposed rezoning may be incom. patible with flu surrounding homes due to cxccs- sive noise, glare, and traffic. Care should he used by Ills local officials in is. suing rezonings or zoning amendments. If too many zoning amendments are authorized, it may and often flocs destroy or seriously weaken the punning; process. It may also open the local cam. "tunny to law suits from adjacent homeowners, Down zoning. Local officials should also be aware of some of ilia problems involved in down zoning; Ihat is, amending ilia zoning ordinance in such a way as to change a zoning district from a higher to a lower density or from a higher use such as commercial or industrial to a lower use such as residential. It has been maintained by some indi- viduals and landowners that a community cannot down zone since it will adversely affect property 70 i vdlucs. The Theory bchinJ tlu% an;nm�m c, Thal somehow a tuning oldin.rnrc cash •Ilh�,l,IIL n;;lus In a property owner of some of his anlicipawd profits and that this amounts Io inverse conderuna. lion. It is clear that if all down zoning were held to be illegal, it would substantially limit the local community's ability to plan and change the uun- prelhensive plan and zoning ordinance. In a recent law case in California (Ehiridge vs. City of I'ulo Alto) the court recently upheld the GIV of Palo Alto in down zoning an area by creating an npen- space district hunt a high -density residential (B- Irict. The city allorney argued successfully Thal this did not amount to inverse condemnation and cited the case of Alorse vs. County of Sur' /.Lois Ohivpo where the court stated that " .... ownels have no vested right in an existing zoning onli- nance. A purchaser merely acquires a right to con- tinue a use institut,•d before the enactment of a more restricted zoning." II should be noted that down zoning has [loll yet been tested in the courts in Minnesota. Zoning Variance Perhaps the toning device which is Ill` least understood and the most subject to abuse is the zoning variance. The term "variance" has been interpreted by many local officials, planning pro- fessionals and even attorneys in its coloquial sense - that is, as a variance from the zoning ordinance that can be issued by the local community at will. It should be noted at the outset, however, that a variance has a special legal meaning and should only be issued under certain special circumstances. basically, a zoning variance is a mortification of the terms of the zoning ordinance in order to pro- vide relief to a properly owner in those cases where the ordinance imposes lindue hardship or practical dif/iculliex to the property owner in the use of his land, The hardship must nut havc been created by actions of the landowner. There are two types of variances - the bulk or area variance and the use variance, The bulk or area variance deals with modifications in area requirements such as lot widths or depths or setback requirements. The rse variance is an authorization of land use in a ,,.district that differs from the land uses normally al- lowed in that district. It should be emphasized that many planning profcssign is, including this author, dr• u;q, red In use cuiances for a number of u,r„nn. I n nor. the issuance 4.1 use variance is likely u1 a .uc .t nu,nopoly situation in a parli• cular lend Lou district. Second, if ton many use vari,mccs are issued by the elected officials, it will seriously weaken the inning and planning process. Many planning pr)fo6mals are recommending That the use variance Ire prohibiled and that the toning anhendnunl or conditional use permit be used in place of the use variance. The County 11I:mning Act (M.S. 394.27, Subd. 7) specifically prohibits Ilse issuance of ace variances; and Ills Municipa! Ilanning Act mly authoritcs rote Iypc of use v.oiance (lemporary use of one family dwcl- ling as Iwo Gunily dwelling - M.S. 462.357, Sllbul. 7). One of the problems which the courts have wrestled with is the definition of "practical diffi- cullies" and "undue hardship." The follow'ingare the facturs which one court used and which other courts are likely to Lose in determining whether a landowner has incurred undue hardship: I. fhe parcel of land cannot yield a "reason- able" return if used only fora purpose al- lowed in the zoning district (for use vari- ances only). The courts havc also held, however, that proof that the owner could realize a higher financial return for his land as a result of the variance is not suf- ficient grounds for granting a variance. 2. The plight of the owner of the land must be due to unique circumstances. If the hard. ship is common to several properties, the variance cannot be granted. The proper remedy under such circumstances is a zoning amendment. 3. The modification will not alter the essential character of the area and should be in con- formance with the comprehensive plan. So "hardship" means more than ordinary in. convenience or difficulty; the courts have interpre. led hardship very stringently. If use variances are nut allowed (as recommended by this author) then the variances should only be applicable in those cases where the owner because of odd -shaped lots or lot remnants is unable to meet the dimensional standards in the zoning ordinance. It should also he noted that special restrictions can be imposed in I Ill MEMO TO: Plowing Cuuunins, ifill FROM: Enginearinq/I'I.uwin,l Technician O'' Ik\'IH: July 2, I'lltl SUUJl:CT: CURGl:NT k1F'1:0Ii11n: lit:011li:i'I". Wciuhnld I'Ciencs,il (1)cci�t:cl.incl Confer) SLalf spoke wiLh ALLurney Moyers Lugarding Lhis propusud rezoning of this parc•rd of land on Highway 10 I•cl.•. n" Crot'oland Rand and Sring We Road. it was ALL"rnoy Meyers' opinion that the rezoning ul. this parcel Isom Lhe cxizt.ng R-1, Single Family to H-4, Regional Buiinvni, would b-• a 11tr ihlc obstacle created in the suit presently being prepared ar,ninst Highway Ul Radiator, Were Life 111.,nning Commission Lu ruconnund and Lhe City Council ultimately rezone thin prnperly to M-4, prinr to the suit hoinil Jocitk!l, l.hi.s may give, tho judge hunring the case a clear indical. dun Ilial. the Icily i"Londs Lhin area Ln he commercial. 1L was Lhen recommended by Cuimclimember Blanchard that the inform.n.Lonal meeting pn"punvd by Lhe Planning Commission be delayed until a courL decininn Is reached on the Highway 10 Radiator lssUe. If. the Weinhold's did submit a formal application, then the Planning Commini ion may decide to conduct this informational meeting and receive citizen input on the request prior to rendering a recommendation. In summary, the: City Attorney dons not: recommend a rezoning of this property to BY prLur to the court decision on the Highway 10 Radiator case. A review of the proposed Zoning Code language was made to determine if an adequate number of parking spaces could be achieved using proposer; oft-sLreet parking language,. It was determined that a sufficient number of parking spaces would not be possible even when using the new language. Therefore, the Planning Commission would need to grant: a variance, of two parkng spaces to allow the conversion of the fourpLex to an office building as pre"ontud. Secondly, staff discussed the Planning Commission's recommendation to rezone this property to B-2 with Attorney Meyers Ind he had no problem with the Commission's recommendation. In fact, Attorney Meyers stated that a B-2 use on the property may have less of an impact on surrounding uses than an R-1 use would, He also stated that this rezoning would have; little impact on the lawsuit as discussed above. Should you have any questions on the above two items, please contact me. N /�" ¢ CO JUL 1983 2563 Ridge Lane rn RECEIVED Mounds View, MN C11Y OF July 12, 1903 Moos VIEW Mr. Frank Kampel City of Mounds View Mounds View, MN Dear Mr. Kampel: We arc hereby requesting that our previous proposal to have the property at 1001 Sunnyside Road rezoned from R-3 to R-0 be modified to have the property rezoned to 0-2 instead of R-0. A variance will be required to establish the easterly side yard setback at 10 feet and we are hereby requesting that the variance be granted. The reasons for the need for this variance have been discussed during the R-0 rezoning meeting so 1 will not go through them again. We are also requesting that a variance be granted to allow for 10 parking spaces rather than the 19 required. The site plan shows the proposed parking layout. We feel this is the most utilitarian and efficient means of providing parking for the building. Also approximately one-third of the building will be used for our own tax preparation service. This business will require parking basically only from January 15 to April 15 of each year. The remaining nine months the parking requirements will be practically zero for this business. The proposed layout will provide for an abundance of parking during those months. Additionally our experience has shown that the majority of the business for the tax service during the January 15 to April 15 period will be done during the hours of 5 P.M. to 9 P.M. when other businesses in the building will probably be closed. This will again serve to minimize parking conflicts Some questions had arisen regarding drainage when we submitted our R-0 rezoning proposal. Following are our answers to these questions: 1) The ponding capacity has been increased from 700 cubic feet to 1116 cubic feet. Calculations are attached for the revised capacity. 2) The detail we have provided you shows the emergency pond overflow at the outlet structure. The overflow water will follow the same ditch as the ordinary outflow. 3) All water will not be detained on site. The pond will empty after each stone at a predetermined rate, i.e., 0,525 cfs. Therefore there will be minimal if any ground water changes in the area. Mr. Frank, Kampel July 12, 1983 Page Two 4) During Lhe spring thaw when the ground is frozen, the runoff will enter the pond and flow gut through the control structure just as it dues al other Limes. In extreme conditions it will flow over the emergency overflow. 5) Since the pond will empty after each $torn, there will be no need For the sail to absorb the water, G) Details of the discharge structure have been submitted. We U•ust this provides you with the information that you require, if You have, any questions or require further information do not hesitate to contact us. Very truly yours, Gordon Rayerkohler %- 4 -i4 jut 1983 RECEIVED OF . EIMtVIEW 1� PROCEEDINGS OF THE PL.ANNTNG COMMISSIOIJ CITY OF MOUNDS VIIiW RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA n' , f� Ug"'V •^` ^ rII Regular Meeting tN / 1y�'d'�" ➢� VCD August 3, 1983 i Y 1 Mounds View City Hall 2401 Ilwy, 10, Mounds View, MN 55112 --------------••----------------------------------------------------------- The. Mound:: View Pl.aonim; Connni:ain❑ w:l:: eal.Led 1.0 order by Chai.rm;ut Mounti.n at 7:30 111.1. MEMBERS PRIiSEMT: Comnii.:;sioners Anderson, i•IcCarLhy, Miller, Qtliclt mid Chairman Mountin. It was noted that Commissioner Marren and Council - member Blanchard were absent. ALSO PRESENT: ling:i.neering/1'lanni.ng Technician Kampel. It was agreed that Commissioner Quick would represent the Planning Conmlission at the next Council meeting, in lieu of Councilmember Blanchard's absence. Motion/Second: Anderson/Quick to approve the minutes of the July 6, 1983 regular meeting and July 20, 1983 special ateeLing, as presented. 5 ayes 0 nay:: There were no residents request:: or conments from the 1:1oor. Motion/Second: McCarthy/Anderson to table discussion iinci.l_ ,Irepresentative I:rom Dynamic 'Des i.gners is present. 5 ayes 0 nays Technician Kampel reviewed the request, noting that the Planning Commission would have to grant a variance of two parking spaces to allow the conversion of the fourplex to an office building, as presented by the l tppli.cant. Ile also reported that Attorney Meyers had found no problem with rezoning the property to B-2, and he felt that a B-2 use on the property may have less of in impact on the surrounding use- than an R-3 use would. 1. Call to 0 2. Roll Call 3. Approval of Minutes: July 6, 198 July 20, 19 Motion Carr 4. Residents Re quests and Comments fro the Floor 5. Dynamic Desi ers, 7656/76 Woodlawn Dr. Case 138-83 Motion Carri 6. Gordon Bayer kohler, 7801 Sunnyside Rd Case 141-83 Mounds View !'Enuring GO"I'lli-Mli On Regul;tt• 1•Iceti.ng ----- _ ... Couuni.:u;i.uner Warreu arrived :IL I August 3 , 1983 Page Two ,s- ;------------- up A t•• � It was Voted that there was no one present to represent 1•I1. Bayerkohler. MuLion/second: t•IcCarLhy/Ili l ler to adopt RC9eLUL'ietl —r— No. 1.i iS:j, recuu:uuudi.nl, a rr;:uui.ng and granLing varLanecs for Planning Ease 1.31-83. 5 a: ca 1 nay !.lotion L'nuuni.:;:;i nc•r 4l,nren cLatvd ::hc had voted agai.nsL LIIc MoLinit ns ::he was IMC in:ainrl':Ible wiCh Lhe i.ntpact this would have ton i.I,gtcrvi.uu;; surface i.n the area, speeifi- rally feu• this p.uti•ul,ir pi,rcc ul7. prc,parLy. hlntion/second: I1c:C:u ehy/Qui.clt to Cake Lhe Dynamic 5• Dynamic Des Desglicrs proposal from the table. crs (Cont.) 0 •lyes 0 nays Motion Cars Technician Kampel reported the Commissioners had received copies of the revised plan, and reviewed his memo of July 25, ouLli.ning ehc proposal, and noting chat there may be come temporary disruption of the area with a wetland zoning district surrounding the building, for Lira purpose of constructing the building which is located outside of the wetland proper but within the buffer area. Ile also noted that four vartaucec would be rcquiced, a building front yard setback, a building side yard setback, curbing, and a variance to the requirement that all structures Ile 100' f1:011 the Weclalld• lc was noted Chat the water flow direction was not shown on the plan, nor the skimmers or landscaping, footage around the buildings, what would be above the 903' contour, and type and location of erosion control methods. It was also noted that the parking require- ments have been met. James Cepress and Art Fretag introduced themselves as representatives from Dynamic Designers, and stated they had nothing to skid to Technician Kampel's report. The Cotmnissioners questioned the access to the tuck - under garages, where the run-off will be going, and if shrubs will be planted between the parking spaces, as space allows. Mr. Fretag replied that the parking space in front of the tuck -under garages would be assigned to the owner of the garage, and that the run-off would be going in a north to norLhwest direction, and that shrubs would be planted between the parking spaces, as space 1 allowed, MOUNDS VII!W PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 71-83 CITY OF MOIiNDS VIE14 COONTY OF RAMSEY STATE. OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING A REZONING AND GRANTING 1ARIANCES FUR PLANNING CASE 131-83 WHEREAS, the City has received an application from Mr. Cordon Bayerkohler, owner of property located at 7801 Sunnyside Road, to convert the existing four unit residential building located on this property to an office building; and WHEREAS, this proposal requires a rezoning of the property from R-3, Medium Density Residential to B-2, Limited Business District; and WHEREAS, the proposed conversion to an office building also requires a building side yard sethack variance and reduced number of parking spaces variance; and WHEREAS, notices of the Planning Commission informational f meeting were sent to all property owners who reside on Sunnyside Road between Highway 10 and Hillview Road in addition to being posted in the two apartment buildings immediately cast of this existing fourplex; and WHEREAS, no response was received from any of these residents concerning this proposal; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission identifies no negative impacts on the surrounding property as a result of the proposed rezoning to B-2; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the request for a building side yard setback variance on the east side of the property; and WHEREAS, this side yard setback variance is justified since the proposed use of the building is not creating the need for this variance; a continuation of the non -conforming setback is being requested since the setback for both the existing use and proposed use do not meet minimum 'Zoning Code requirements; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commissicn has also reviewed the request for a variance of two parking spaces; and ' WHEREAS, in order to preserve the natural tree/shrub buffer, green space, and the drainage of the site, a two parking space variance is needed; and FA Mounds Vied planning Commission Iie Solu Lion No. 91-03 payr. Two WHEI'AS, the City Engineer has reviewed this proposal for conformity with chapter 49A and finds the drainage plan to be in conformance with Chapter 49A of the Municipal Code; NOW, I'llEREFORE ISE I'I' lll•::iOLVED that the Mounds view Plan- ning Commission hereby recommends to the City Council approval of a rezoning of properly locatud at 7801 Sunnyside Road, legal description of which is Spring Lake Park Hillview, subject to Ilighway and except the northeasterly 150 feet, Lot 84, from R-3, Medium Density Residential to B-•l, Limited Business, and also recommmends that the Comprehensive Plan he amended to reflect this proposed change in use; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that, contingent upon the City Council rezoning the above property, the Planning Commission approves o side yard setback variance of to feet from the south- east side of the building to the southeast property line and also approves a variance of two parking spaces to allow the construc- tion of 18 spaces; ISi: IT FURTHER RESOLVED that approval is contingent upon Rice Creek Watershed District and Minnesota Department of Trans- portation approval, if required; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the drainage, site and land- scape plan all become part of the development agreement. ATTEST: (SEAL) Adopted this 3rd day of August, 1983. Chairperson Director of Public Works/ Community Development 0 ry � I!!YIMIn IMf1 ••� i ' � mlG 1� ___ I / � i\lit i J i J/ Illvw) i { i it 1 I ; ) / Kai NL -- — � ram! I , I, L Ill .w 101 ..`. i IN11 Iwly mf n 'nl)ef iwa u unt MIun�Nn n 111 SUIJLIY610E kOAD .Now W L� W., 4D .4.1" 4 Luu. DLuon> uunuG L DL M.111, YLGWLLD W4DL oluol4. 04LL11W w D41141G4 'P.LLw4 M. le Y wvr.LL. wll4 P GY.I'LL .uD C NIYMI4DU>- P IMLT n To MwL [GuuuuouP vvvrta Guve __.51TE AIM DRAIWAGL PLAAL_ PROPD>LO DI/ILL •,Dq 6UWUY5I0L • /�!•f�41 VIEGtJ 0 r3r•en\ I. CMERGPUCy OVFi2Ft,OL ESE✓. 9S2, 9 T' 2x4 ieEMFD �` ` [tE✓. BOARDS, Uo \ iiicot 0h 9S/.O / CP G1 �( O T OreFC o Cr' °' �� n` cF 95o.7 o C I,Its (?� FLOW %/�� DIRHGiIoN eF FLO41 1,1 i U LJ b :c�i� IL�C•p��t ,� "oc rAR N I �--4.y4"TT;r-ArEO Fbs-r I Zf BuQy olov.) BERM L.' � 1 i coN RbL sT U(-Tu�r— bl TNL erIi"A'om kw 4; " A 1983 RECEIVED CITY 0 MOUNDS VIEW n RESOLUTION NU. 1643 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNES(1TA RES(II.IPPION APPROVING PLANNING CASE 131-83 WHEREAS, Mr. Gordon Bayerkohler has signed an agreement to purchase property owned by Mr. Allen Heckman and Mr. Marlin Melgo1st for property owned at 7801 Sunnysidc Road; and WIIEREAS, Mr.Bayerkohler has submitted an application to convert the existing 4-unit residential building to an office building; and WHEREAS, this conversion requires a rezoning from the existing R-3 use to B-2; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commisison has reviewed this request and recommended approval by adopting Resolution No. 91-83; and WHEREAS, the site plan conforms to requirements as established by Chapters 40 and 49A; and WHEREAS, THE Rice Creek Watershed District is in the process of reviewing this proposal but to date has not approved a permit; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed this proposed rezoning and development request and agree with the recommendations of the City Council; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View City Council hereby approves the conversion of the existing 4-unit residential building at 7801 Sunnyside Road to an office building and a rezoning of the proeprty from R-3 to B-2, based upon the site and drainage plan dated July 8, 1983; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this approval shall be contingent upon receiving approval from the Rice Creek Watershed District. ATTEST: '11".e (SEAL) Adopted this day of , 1983. Mayor Clerk -Administrator ORDINANCE' NO. 346 Cl'l'Y OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA AA'DRDINANCE ANXNDINC THK MUNICIPAL COOK. OF MOUNDS VIEW BY AMENDING CHAPTER 41 ENTITLED, "SFECIFI: REVONINGS" The Council of the City of Mounds View does hereby ordain: SECTION 1. 41.11 Pursuant to Chapter 40.23, the Official Mounds View zoning map is hereby amended to reflect the following rezoning: Subdivision 1. Spring Lake Park 11111view, subject to highway and except the northeasterly 150 feet of Lot 84 is hereby rezoned from R-3 to B-2. This ordinance shall take effect thirty days after the date of its publication.. I _ Read by the Council of the City of Mounds View on the day of , 1983. Read and passed by the Council of the City of Mounds View this day of , 1983. ATTEST: (SEAL) Mayor Clerk -Administrator r1. 1 CONSI'NT AGENDA August 22, 1983 The Consent Agenda is a Lechnique designed to expedite handling of routine and miscellaneous official business of the City Council. The entice Agenda may be adopted by the Council in one motion. The motion for adoption is non -debatable and must receive unanimous approval. By request of any individual Councilmember, any item can be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed upon the Regular Agenda for debate. ITEM A. Reschedule September 5, 1983 Agenda Session for 6:00 p.m. on September 6, 1983 ITEM B. Schedule Budget• Work Session for 7:00 p.m. on August 29, 1983 ITEM C. Adopt Resolution No. 1645 - Approving the Subdivision for Cross of Glory Lutheran Church ITEM D. Authorize Submittal of Staff Letter Regarding Used Vehicles at Northeast Marine ITEM E. Set Public Hearing for for Flood Plain Filling 1983 at 7:40 p.m. ITEM F. Licenses for Approval Rezoning and Conditional Use Permit by Dynamic Designers on September 12, Gambling Device License - September 14, 1983 Mounds View Lions Club General - Expire 6/30/84 Minnesota Exteriors - Renewal Sewer & Water. - Expire 6/30/83 Midwestern Mechanical - Renewal ITEM G. Adopt Resolution No. 1646 - Approving Just and Correct Claims Against City Funds MEMO TO: Clerk —Administrator and City Council FROM: Engineering/Planning Technician DATE: August 17, 1983 SUBJECT: CROSS OF GLORY LUTHERAN CHURCH FINAL PLAT Attached please find a copy of the Cross of Glory Lutheran Church Final Plat/Registered Land Survey. Staff has reviewed this survey and finds it to be in conformance with the Preliminary Plat that was approved by Resolution No. 1635 (attached). STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution No. 1645. FJK/bc Attachments I4� r RESOLUTION NO. I635 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF HAMSI.Y STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR CROSS OF GLORY LUTHERAN CHURCH WHEIREAS, represt! nLaLIVes of Crust, of Glory Lutlie ran Chu rcli have submitted a proposal to subdivide five ^.xisting lots into two lots for property located at 5472 Adams .treat; and WHEREAS, a major subdivision is being proposed since the properties involved total 2 . I I acres; and WHEREAS, the preliminary plat has been reviewed by the Mounds View Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has recommended to the City Council approval of the preliminary plat by adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. 88-83; and WHEREAS, the City Council conducted it public hearing on the proposed major subdivision on July 25, 1983, with notice of the public hearing being sent to all property owners within 350 feet; and WIILRFAS, the subdivision meets minimum Zoning Code requirements; NOW, TIIERRFORE, , III. IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View City Council approves the preliminary plat of a major anbdlvtsion of the Cross of Glory Lutheran Church property dated May, 1983, revised ,tune 9, 1983. Adopted this 25th day of July, 1983. ATTEST: J / (SEAL) RESOLUTION NO. 1645 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SUBDIVISION FOR CROSS OF GLORY LUTHERAN CHURCH WHEREAS, the Mounds View Planning Commission reviewed the preliminary plat for a proposed major subdivision for Cross of Glory Lutheran Church at their July 6, 1983 meeting and adopted Resolution No. 88-83 recommending approval to the City Council; and WHEREAS, the Mounds View City Council has reviewed the preliminary plat and approved the plat on July 25, 1983 by adopting Resolutin No. 1635; and WHEREAS, the City staff has reviewed the final plat/ registered land survey and finds it to be in conformance with the preliminary plat; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View City Council hereby approves the final plat/registered land survey for Cross of Glory Lutheran Church dated May, 1983 and received August 17, 1983. ATTEST: (SEAL) 11 Adopted this 22nd day of August, 1983. Mayor Clerk —Administrator FiJ1l. D MEMO TO: Clerk -Administrator and City Council FROM: Engineering/Planning Technician n1 DATE: August 17, 1983 SUB JKCT: USED VEHICLES AT NORTHEAST MARINE Per the request by Councilmember Linke and Clerk -Administrator Pauley, I have checked into the ownership of vehicles presently being offered for sale at Northeast Marine. Upon checking the vehicle registrations it was discovered that 3 of the 4 vehicles presently being offered for sale are not owned by either Mr. George Ile Marais nor the Northeast Marine Company. Since this establishment is neither licensed nor has a condi- tional use permit to operate this type of business been approved, I questioned Attorney Meyers and the Clerk - Administrator what they recommend the City's next step be. Both suggested writing a letter to Mr. De Marais ordering the immediate discontinuance of any type of new or used vehicle sales. Attached is a copy of the letter which I am requesting Council approve to mail to Mr. De Marais. Please review the letter and advise whether it should be mailed. Should you have any questions regarding this item, please contact me. FJK/bc I if 1r' 0fvou'll S (QV' RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA 240111IGIlWAY 10 MOUNDS VIEW, MINN. 55112 784.3055 August 16, 1983 Mr. George DeMarais Northeast Marine 2800 highway 10 Minneapolis, MN 55432 Dear Mr. DeMarais: Per Chapter 109 of the Mounds View Municipal Code (copy attached), no person, firm or corporation shall engage in the business of selling, trading or exchanging new or used automobiles within the municipality without first obtaining a license. You do not have a valid license to sell vehicles at your Northeast Marine location, nor has a conditional use permit been granted for this type of business operation. The City of Mounds -View hereby orders you to immediately cease the offering for sale of any new or used vehicles from your property at Northeast Marine and to not reoffer for sale any new or used vehicles front this location until a conditional use permit and valid license has been obtained from the City Council. Sincerely, CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW Frank J. Kampel Department of Community Development FJK/bc Attachment cc: Acting Police Chief Tim Smith Clerk -Administrator Don Pauley City Attorney Richard Meyers City Council 109.01 r, CHAPTER 109 NEW AND USED CARS 10g.01 JALcensc liaguired. No person, firm, or corporation ^hall engage inthebusiness of selling, trading, or exchanging new or usecl automobiles, domestic or foreign, within the Municipality withouC firrL obtaining a license as provided in this chapter. For lhr! purposes of this chapter anyone who as a earl: of his livelihood engages in the regular sale, trade, or exchange of automobiles shall t:! deemed to be doing business as a new or used automobile dealer. 109.02 Application and Issuance. Subdivision 1. A�lication. Application for such license shall be made in writing to the Clerk -Administrator and shall state the full name anti address of the applicant, the location where the business is to be carried on, and the owner of the premises. Subdivision 2. Nearing. The Clerk -Administrator shall submit the said application to the Council for its consideration. The Council by motion may grant or refuse to grant the license after consideration of the application. The Council may require that a public hearing be had before the Council upon any application, such hearing to be he.lcl at such time and upon such notice as the Council may determine. After such a hearing, the Council by motion, may grant the license or refuse to grant the license. Subdivision 3. Condit -ions. The Council may impose any cundit.ions or restrictions it deems necessary or advisable in the public interest in the motion granting any license hereunder, including but not being limited to, conditions relating to the hours of cperation, the lighting of the business and the installation and maintenance of shrubbery, fencing and grounds around the business. Subdivision A. After Issuance Conditions. The Council may also impose any such conditions or restricts ns by motion at any time after the issuance of a license hereunder. 109.03 Licenses. The fee for every such license shall be established by resolution of the City Council. Every such license shall expire on December 31 next after its issuance. License shall not be transferrable from one person to another and a new license must be applied for each time a place of business is changed. Every such license shall be kept conspicuously posted about the place for which the license is issued and shall be exhibited to any person upon request. (230) 109.04 1.09.04 Ito vocation. Every such license may be revoked by the Council, if Le -ff4 licensee has been given reasonable notice and an upporLuniLy to be heard, for the violation of any provision of this chapter, or for the violation of any conditions or restrictions in the motion granting the license, or any motion thereafter passed by the Council, or upon failure of the licensee to comply with any conditions, order or direction issued by the Council. 109.05 Penally. Any person, firm or corporation which shall violate any provision of this chapter shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. (59) MEMO TO: Clerk-AdmIni,trator and city Council FROM: IingInee rIng/111AunIn9 Technician DATE: August 18, 1983 SUBJECT: DYNAMIC DESIGNERS The Planning Commission at their August 17, 1983 special meeting approved Resolution Nos. 93-83 and 94-83 concerning the Dynamic Designers proposal. This item will he placed on your Agenda Session agenda on September 5, 1983 for review. Included on the August 22nd consent agenda is the setting of arpublingic hearing gdfor September 12, 1983 at 7:40 p.m. Lhe rezoning and recommended for the conditional use permit. Attached is the site plan upon which the Planning Commission based their recommendations for your review prior to the Agenda Session. One item of concern to the Planning Commission when discussing this development relates to what would and would not be allowed within the wetland (below the 903 contour) insofar as grounds maintenance and amount and type of use of this area. The Planning Commission was particularly concerned that, should no activity whatsoever be allowed within the wetland nd area reated,efor removal of weeds/tall grass, etc.) hazards may instance fire, with these grasses being in close proximity to the building, which in this case, abuts the wetland boundary ' elevation. The Commission discussed that there should be some buffer distance between the building and the site area where some maintenance should occur (cutting of tall grasses). Please note number 6 under items to be included in the wetlands alteration permit in Resolution No. 94Resolution associationeshoulddstate that what the covenants for the property owners ithinion that llowedwithin this area. FJK/bc Attachment MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION f� RESOLUTION NO. 93-83 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSI;Y STATE. OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION APPROVING VARIANCES FOR THE DYNAMIC DESIGNERS PROPOSAL WHEREAS, Mr. Jim Cepress and Mr. Art Fretag of Dynamic Designers have requested approval to construct an 8-unit condominium at 7656 Woodlawn Drive; and WHEREAS, the location of this property and proposed building lie within a designated wetland zoning district; WHEREAS, Section 48.06 Subdivision 4 A (I) of the Mounds View Municipal Code allows for dimensional requirement modification to further the purposes of the wetland ordinance; and WHEREAS, the location of the building as proposed to remain out of the wetland proper would require approval of the following variances: r- a) Building side yard setback of 6 feet. _ b) Building front yard setback of 7 feet. c) Parking area curbing setback of 4 feet. d) Variance to the requirement that all structures be setback at least 100 feet from the wetland. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission identifies the following as hardships by which a variance is needed: a) The property was acquired by Dynamic Designers prior to the adoption of the Wetland Ordinance.. b) The present condition was not developer created. c) Without a variance to the requirement that all structures be setback at least 100 fact from the wetland, the property would be rendered undevolop- able. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that contingent upon approval being given by the Mounds View City Council to combine the two lots under consideration into one and evidenre of the recording of deeds being submitted to the City, the Mnundn VIaw Planning Commission hereby approves the following: 1) A 6 foot variance to the building side yard sothack requirement. 2) A 7 foot variance to the building front yard setback requirement. RN801,11TIIIN NO. 'I I••H7 1'nga Two I) A h Inot vnr(novi, t,i the curb to property line If illnlunre requirement. A) A vnrlonce In allow it structure within the 100 Inol wrll,uid bulfrr area. 8h' I I' Plll('I'IIEII 8N51)I,VVD that the Planning Commission dlrectn staff lip forward this runolution to the City Council prior la nppruvnI fn the minu tea. Adopted Ihin tiny of 1983. nrTltllr I Chairman (88AL) Director of Public Works Community Development 0 0 MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 94-83 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A MINOR SUBDIVISION, REZONING, CONDITIONAL. USE PERMIT AND DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL FOR DYNAMIC DESIGNERS WHEREAS, Mr. Jim Cepress and Mr. Art Fretag of Dynamic Designers have requested approval to construct an 8-unit condominium at 7656 Woodlawn Drive; and WHEREAS, the location of this property and proposed building lie within a designated wetland zoning district; and WHEREAS, Chapter 48 of the Mounds View Municipal Code governs development within wetland buffer areas; and WHEREAS, the lot upon which this proposed building is to be located also lies within a designated flood plain; and WHEREAS, Chapter 49 of the Mounds View Municipal Code governs development within the flood plain area; and WHEREAS, both Chapters 4H and 49 nIlwvicertalnt within buffer and flood plain area, respecLlvoly, under conditions; and WHEREAS, the development as proposed would require approval of the following; I) A minor subdivision combining the two into into one. 2) A rezoning from R-3 to R-4. 3) A wetlands alteratlun permit. 4) A conditlonol use permit to allow the filling of a portion of thv flood plain. 5) The following varLaurau: a) Building side yard setback of 6 feet; b) Building front yard nutback of 7 feet; c) Parking area curbing setback of 4 feet; d) Variance to the requiremunt that all structures be Outback at lenaL IUO feet from the wetland; and RESOLUTION NO. 94-83 Page Two WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has adopted Resolution No. 93-83 approving the four variances listed above contingent upon the City Council approving the minor subdivision combining; the two existing lots into one; and -.WHEREAS, since only one principal buiLding is allowed per lot and in order for Chapter 48 to apply, the combination of the two existing lots into one is necessary; and WHEREAS, since the existing zoning of the property is R-3, Medium Density Residential, a rezoning to R-4, High Density Resi- dential, is required for the proposed use; and WHEREAS, a rezoning is being recommended since the Intended use of the property is consistant with the Comprehensive plan designation; and WHEREAS, the requirements of Chapter 49A relating to on -site storage of water have been met, according to the City Engineer; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission recommends to the City Council approval of a minor subdivision combining the two lots under consideration into one; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission recommends to the City Council approval of a rezoning of the property from R-3, Medium Density Residential to R-4, High Density Residential; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission also recommends to the City Council that a conditional use permit be granted for the filling of a portion of the flood plain, since the proposed filling will not alter the flood height by a measur- able amount; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission also recommends to the City Council that the following items be included with the wetlands alteration permit: 1) Conveyance of an easement over the area within the 903 contour for drainage purposes. 2) Discharge criteria as outlined in 48.06, Subdivision 3(c) paragraphs 3, 4, 5 and 6. 3) A time limit be set for the completion of the project, in no event to exceed 12 months from the date of issuance of the permit. 1 _ RESOLUTION NO. 94-83 Page Three 4) Temporary site disruption shall be allowed to occur generally within the area 15 feet beyond the building edge (as shown on revised site plan dated 8/16/83) provided that these areas be restored to the existing or better condition immediately following the time where the use of this area is necessary for buiding construction. 5) A density credit of 4.35 units be granted for the development. 6) The covenants for the property owners association shall clearly set out the amuunt and type of use and maintenance that will be allowed within the wetland (below the 903 contour), BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission also recommends to the City Council that the development agreement include the following: 1) Performance and maintenance of all drainage structures to be the owner's responsibility. -ti 2) Plan shall show location of emegency overflow for parking area. 3) The wetland area below the 903 contour be protected during the construction period based upon the City Engineer and Rice Creek Watershed District require- ments, with the exception of the 15 foot area desig- nated for temporary construction activities. In the temporary construction areas, protection of the wetland sha1L occur at the edge of this 15 foot distance immediately adjacent to the wetland. 4) A landscape plan which includes earth berming along the Woodlawn Drive boulevard. 5) That securities be submitted to cover all development agreement items, specifically, wetland protection, maintenance of drainage facilities and all other site improvements listed in this resolution. 6) Building shall be flood -proofed below elevation 905 per State Building Code requirements. BE IT FURTHER resolved that the Planning Commission recommends to the Parks and Recreation Commission that ten per- cent of the wetland area easemented be applied to the park fund dedication required for this subdivision; ItIiSDI,UTIDN NO. 94-85 page Your Uh: IT FURTHER RIiSULHD that tho Planning Commission directs stall to forward this resolution to the City Council prior Lu nppruvaI of the minutes. •Adopted this day of , 1983. ATTts•r: (SEAO Chairman Director of Public Works Community Development Y E 1646 18183 43,730.72 .1.1905.- 11979 61,397.42 105,128.14 on Ly Council of Mounds View voLo by the CITY 17' 0 ! '. I 7. !4, I , 7 0 T - - - i 1 �TTY V: L T uij r L r c F U L L L k �LL Y A A 1 T 1. ITT L t,; AP F;, I T L L L A APPPcr IATIl I A T I Li i. �T TIP L T I I : , f !T �71 F V'S T ''Tf T lA NK N S4CRIFFS& ldo T.. T -. I F F (I 1 T L r H r I i Ll f T f i 1 1 T CF. LAST G:':'IL Pl., T 1;a I III •: r I T V "119�'.Ti 'A= Y rA•• n A', C 1191! A :1lril12 011513 A 4, Q 11914 5 ".11917 '• r ,rq . I TJt A:. AG 51:127 A!� I. ��, fJ11923 r rll^'C A t" 0119?r J 11'i'r. : 1:.. 11 .. 7 5 2.:4 13E* E5 49.12 445. '- I:: . 77 L f I Y :? i11G..ELcCT4IC C'ii6HT I, V:-T �V1%:. Y :? C0' - UT1-P M.: , Tc AL Ir.0 CATA DIJ,'AT%r FNC DAVEJ S=:RT Sli,v CAVTtfS .faT- r:UIj":;4T CITY :'F "'19L_Y CatAI °XAIt HAeFV 4cC4t,TICN Cn IWn; HEALY L,i•;?A% RIES J C AUI- ;UPPLY ! I = JGUN G J HhS t: LAYNJ HI'IV':SrTA CO 7. LILLIC SUBURBA14 M1CiliS ". HTLJ VGN-U-LI1' Tpr4aG.17 HFTRC ViAiTF i,;:TH L C;:" e A c. F If v,el 'A SUPPLIES, UTILITIES SUP'=LIES, UTILITIES 1,.LLECTI^.'S-'IHLu AGCYS ':T F'JSC COLLt.MVI --' ,.,,T-P FUFLJ + LU'+-.ICA':TS--- A SUFPLIES,OPE"ATING u I:e 0 A '1E 1 GLELl . ^ 1I w i. is i . 'AYA 1LE ;a A SLC LIES, UTILIII . PrU PEFAIFS, .,TiL. T I B ss0 fe Pk I?, TI11G SUPPLIES+ GLUGStG;?;IGS .0FESSIINAL 5ERV ,.IA -i t ;;A PrITY Gf v(U4CS VTEN A C [ ll T '; 4 y rE '+ H, CK 4 , r U , 1 % !. I, 1 ' A , T Q11927 011'32 8 �fl J 1192 c 0110i0, C1+931 1 1.L ej I' iItU? a�31933 Q11434 v. �- 01193 G ___ Q11935 01194Q ' 011941 i6c.47 14. E,7C4.1.? 197.T1 1s, QQ ti'WaY 1`,G11ST(,IAL SU'LY "IGWf,�I 5'l-H-4L7 10.:, Iq; I„'rFs TA UC Fuf,D VIEW Cut Gw:. Hl;u•= ''LtL I:LL'"^rh- CO ' =IGHT;N RENT. AO JHC-'-N STATE" 0(%E6 (G NGF;THr6N STATES POWER ,.: Tk' STATE "^ ER PLETSCHIHS INC 11 U. P G :, F SUc+'LIf.S,)AF.P.ATIyc "_a: �- SIIF",LiFS, STRtF.TS SUPPLIES, !PMEN'T At, :L1 1 :fI• a t?T TINE 17 - P7 4uNa FESrltll! vISSI01: u , I 1• TIT. . , :vJ LT Nlcl= 1:'D-SUnp:L: T: .L.i1ES ANO-Si;PFLI ,T(Ti, L.^,:j ;rl_";.Io;.T TIME --- = LI °f ILO�;t1a0S S U= LT, V I;tILi J-SU LT: '.'.-SUPFLICS,OPF T ;; A',(1-SU'rIIE, UrILITIES A';D-SUnrIIE', EiwrP(SEP�T------••] S(IF - LIES,CFERAT I'.r; I I• A•.0-Su?�IIES. nLn1$+GaYOS ------'•' AtO-SIPM Sf cI11Tou�i1T sl• F,LECTPICITY A' D-NATURAL GAS Ah0-STREET LIGHTS J>, ANG-TRAFFIC SIGNALS - ELECT i� ELECTRICITY s AkD-NATUPAL GA 17 I`„ ELECTRICITY SALAFIETi,Ti':'+PA t TINE °° I67 CITY (:F kl.W;r� VIi:N A U, T - r CHICK" L " I. U ' T , 1. L I ' , T ?'i. 44 •'. !��_r . iid�� �'l11!I"' T Lt 1F?. 411 Y r.�U: TY lRLP.:i'..roc r. 470! i0zI1 UN'd(- FA•'r CL S[G 51. i ;A%rLA S R='SE 1F,7,ri S , T "FFIC!: '?GOUCTS '61.%1, 51 PAV1. 1N'1 _.U:U': '.?• 303.? :;'ITN lU"i-? !" 11''„T[,Y :"ITI- SPCC14LTY a'F,LC'!16 41,01 TI" SPARING -:US 'Y, I :C 23,27 H. >. TOLL CCNFANY 479 fwl', �',ITY TESTING !G?.74 W OURG TIRE. GO 27.71 NATCV FROOUCTS CO CLL4 WILLIaPS FIL>'S I-.0 12E.1; PARY OREIQENSTEIN le,60G OAMN SWISON +AUL J!'H':SgN i,7CC,Ci M V UYF[?E.S ISOCCIATTON OAVIO C RYOOF.RG 140,7f: HAFPI T'LL`FSO', RULP MPI' • U*4T. SVCS., QAnStY rY SaLAP.IF.S,TE' + "'ISC nFFTCE S11r�!. Y� Tr'AINING -'T' .:,::y.:T TINE '.ISl' CFFIC:. :'�UPFLIL S w L 0-3UP LIi' , UTILITi_ OTHi r'. SUPPLIES,OPERATING, C,TN=R '-"FESSIOt:AL Sr.' V SUPCL[E5, VENICLF Q SUPPLICS, UTILITIk; _ RE I;rALI rUOT:'?UI T .a PRO6RA,v It STPUr, r,. "t PROGRAM INSTi'UCTO=S -; )i,FAV rN ;T,'11C 1' ? S I„ R3GRA•, INSTRUCT?2S Ie, I • SUVLIt r = I r� u r CITY CF PNNC VI, -" + CHffK+ ! U 6L Q 1196A ?. a4 ' a11964 437.7: C. I' Q11971 2,232.�" t 11 Q11972 4C.:' `I T C Y R L L J ♦ c '':n ;� y*CS :•'HI::,K[ TTC 'VICE f4.C. ,ISPIiiUTING INC .1;;A ''.t:LS ::'•CTr;G SEPV n ti G f Ii1;14 :•5'CC IN SITU°I,:CUi C;iI:';ULTiNG n1:ITF iUHNINGS 'i11PCL I+'St(T'ii C.;ALU LATVALA ICHAFL Mii RG•1N CSEPH C°iTr •?FtI S ANC PCf'--,72Y !?;T "ARKeTI;;6 GRCUF � ^•ELS`_ Cl"CK.- 0, TIT'. i. I"-i,1-`.14 "AT -?3-r' 'AG 5 JTH P'2'r;.S`IONAL SEPV $[LLLII ' SUPPLIES, ECUOPHCNT F-.STTVITIES Un"I'MON_ SU%'LIE'', 'JTILITI•: c PsI'S, UTTLIT� Rf FUNOS RCFU;;^S G E F U N RrFiJ'•0S a c F IT +t r I! URDI 1: NCC NO. 333 CITY OF 61OU14DS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA AMENDING THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF MOUNDS VIEW 13Y AMENDING CHAPTER 32 ENTITLED, "THE PLANNING COMMISSION" The Council of: the City of 1•1ounds View does hereby ordain: SECTION 1• Chapter 32.05, Subdivision 4, is hereby amended to read as follows: 32.05, Subdivision 4, Bylaws, Records. The Commission shall adopt bylaws for its governance and for the transaction of its business. The bylaws shall be reviewed on an annual basis at the first regular mceti.ncL in Febrruary. A recording secretary, who may he recouunended-liy the Planning Commission for appointment, shall keep a record of attendance at Commission meetings, a record of resolutions, transactions, findings and determinations, and a record of the votes and abstentions on each question requiring a vote. The record of the Commission shall be a public record. SECTION 11, Chapter 32.07 is hereby amended to read as follows: 1 „• `4,." 32.07 shall be amended to read as follows: 32.07 Reports. At- the- Iast-regular•-meeting-of- the-Geuneii•in ©e8ember-a f•-each-year;-the-Gemmissie n-sha II-subiflit-a-repent-e€-its work -during -the -preceding -year- The City Council may request an annu report from the Planning Commission of its work during the preceding vear. 32.09 shall be amended to read as follows: 32.09 Vacancies. Subdivision 1. Removal From Office. An appointed member of the Commission may be removed from office for just cause and on written charges by at least four/fifths vote of the entire City Council, but such member shall be entitled to a public hearing before such vote is taken. In addition, an appointed member may be removed for non- attendance at Planning Commission meetings as provided in the bylaws adopted by the Planning Commission. It shall be the duty of the Chairman of the Commission to notify the City Council promptly of any vacancies occurring in membership. The Mayor, with approval of the City Council, shall fill such vacancies for the unexpired term of the original appointment. Subdivision 2. Termina .member desiring to terminate before the exoiration of the lion of rm n tment. Anv Commission written no ntention. 1 Ordinance No. 333 Paste 1. This Ordi.naucc :hall take cffc;L thirty (30) days after the da of its publicaLion. head by the Council of the City of Mounds View on the day of , 1983. head and pa:;scd by the Council of the City of Mounds View this day of: 111,13. ATTEST: (SEAL) APPROVED AS TO FORM: ity Attorney Mayor Clerk -Administrator t 11 ,� oRru:ulh:Cl: l:o. 3s4 crry op MOU11U:i V11.3.1 CUU'r1'1"i 0[' 11•I:iliY AhIEIIDIi'JC 'I'Illi ;l(Ji•11('II'i)I, (:ODI{ 01•' hIUUI'lU5 VIEI.1 Ily AhiE41U1.i10 C:IIAP'1'I:R 43 ENTITLED, "MOBILE HOMES" The Council of the City Of: Mounds View does hereby ordain: SECTION 1. Chapter 13.01, Definitions, is hereby amended by adding the following new parayraph and renumbering all paragraphs of Chapter 43.01: efi Home. A manufactured atutes, C ante- e is one that SECTION II. Chapter 13.02, Locations, (1), is hereby amended to read as follows: O) It shall be unlawful within the limits of Mounds View for any person to park any mobile home or manufactured home on any street, alley, highway, or other public place or on any tract of land owned by any person, occupied or unoccupied within Mounds View, except as provided for in this Chapter or Chapter 40 of the Municipal Code. — SECTION III. Chapter 43.02, Locations, (3), is hereby amended to read as follows: (3) No person shall park or occupy any mobile home or -manufac- tured home which is situated outside of an approved mobile home park except 8hak as allowed in Chapter 40 of the Municipal Code The parking and storage of no more than one (1) mobile home in an accessory private garage building or in a rear yard in any district is permitted providing that no living quarters shall be maintained, nor any business practiced in said mobile home. This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after the date of its publication. ) Read by the Council of the City of Mounds View on the day of 1983. Read and passed by the Council of the City of Mounds View this day of 1983 ATTEST: Mayor (SEAL) 1 APPROVED AS TO FORM; �✓ Clerk -Administrator City Attorney MEMO TO: Mounds View City Council ,w FROM: Bruce K. Anderson, Direct Parks, ReereaLion and DATE: August 18, 1983 RE: Part-time Aquatics Director Enclosed are t-hroq documents that. the City Council will need to approve prior to 1,,e hiring of Ms. Maureen Thielen as a part-time aquatics coordinator for the City of Mounds View. The first document is a memorandum of understanding between the City and Ms. Thielen which outlines the specific job responsibilities as well as the reimbursement package that the City will provide for the services as outlined. The second item is Resolution No. 1644 which is a joint powers aggreement between the School District #621 and the City of Mounds View which outlines the school district's involvement in the program as far as coordination of aquatics programs on a district wide basis. The third item is Addendum A which outlines the proposed job re- sponsibilities that we will work towards during the coming year but do not see as specific criteria that Ms. Thielen would be held responsible for. Staff has reviewed the enclosed material with Ms. Thielen on / three separate occasions and we feel that both the City and Ms. Thielen will benefit. The major change that has arisen during the past week is that we were initially hoping to provide health benefits on a pro -rated share for Ms. Thielen but Group Health's current policy is that employees have to work a minimum of 30 hours per week which would not make her eligible for this pro- gram. At this time we have eliminated the City's involvement in the health benefit program and staff has indicated to Ms. Thielen that should the status of health insurance change during the coming year, we would review her involvement in the program once again. Staff proposes that this position will be funded from three separate sources; $3,500.00 to be funded from the Lakeside Park Commission's account; $1,500.00 from the City of Mounds view's recreation activity account that has been used in the past for aquatic personnel supervision; the remainder from the recreation activity program fees out of account 250-351-4304 which staff feels will potentially grow through outside revenue sources such as greater municipality involvement in the business community and increased program participation. Staff feels that the Aquatics Coordinator position as outlined for a one year period will enable the City to review our current direction and we would review the contract in one year to determine if it should be modified or extended. Should you have any questions regarding staff's position on this issue, feel free to contact myself directly at extension 141. RECOMMENDATION: to direct staff to enter into an agreement with Ms. Maureen Thielen on a one year interim basis to be retained as the City's Aquatics Director and adopt resolution no. 1644; entering into a joint powers agreement with the school district for school wide district coordination of facilities. RESOLUTION NO. 1644 U W'' A CITY OF 14OUNDS VIEW n COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION OF GUIDELINES RELATING TO THE POSITION OF AQUATIC COORDINATOR FOR THE CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW WHEREAS, the Mounds View Community Education Department will con- tribute up to $2,000.00 to the Mounds View Parks and Recreation Department for the position of Aquatics Coordinator for the period of Aion De artm to Aug• 22, 1934. The following outline lists the minimum service expectation. I. Program Coordination A. Work with the Cities of New Brighton and Shoreview to coordinate a comprehensive water safety instruction program, that; I. Provides Red Cross Certified youth instruction. 2. Provides programming for district residents of all ages. 3. Includes programming in the areas of open swim, splash parties, and other specialized areas (diving, super ducks, basic rescue/water safety). 4. Schedules programs to insure that similar classes are offered at different times throughout the week and on Saturdays. B. Work with the Cities of New Brighton and Shoreview to coordinate publicity so that; I. Quarterly schedules at all pool programs are distributed district wide. 2. Programs sponsored by district swimming associations are included. 3. All District N621 residents have equal opportunity to participate in any program without a non-resident fee. C. Work with the Cities of New Brighton and Shoreview to coordinate pool personnel so that; 1. A minimum of one WSI is in the pool during any activity, 2. A district wide pool staff in service is scheduled to cover emergency procedures. RESOLUTION NO. 1644 • PAGE 2 I1. Facility Coordination A. Work with the Cities of New Brighton and Shoreview to coordinate pool scheduling so that; 1. All community usage of district pools will be scheduled through the local Park and Recreation Departments. 2. Pool usage permits will be applied for and granted based on Policy #1330. 3, Community usage of pools is scheduled around school programming. 4. Swimming associations will schedule with local Park, and Recreation Departments and have equal opportunity for scheduling at all pools. 5, The Aquatics Coordinator will provide an up-to-date community usage record of all pools for the Community Education Department. 6. The community education office will be informed on a regular basis of all problems and accidents or other concerns at the area pools. III. Other Conditions A. The Aquatics Coordinator will be supervised by the Park Director of the Mounds View Park and Recreation Department. B. An end of the year review of the Aquatic Coordinator position and pool program at the Edgewood Community Center will be provided to the Community Education Department by the City of Mounds View. C. A joint review and evaluation of these expectations will be completed before further continuation of this aggreement. Adopted this 22nd day of August, 1983. Mayor McCarty ATTEST: Councilmember Doty Councilmember Blanchard Councilmember Hankner Councilmember Linke (SEAL) Clerk -Administrator Pauley MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEIN vr'((_ THE CITY UI' MOUNDS VIEW AND M.S. MAUREEN THIELF.N, FOR UUTLING THE DUTIES OF THE CI'ras PART-TIME AQUATICS DIRECTOR (�J/ i The Iollowing memorandum of understanding is hereby entered into between the City of Mounds View and Ms. Maureen Thielen to perform and provide the services of a part-time aquatics director which will include but not he limited to the following scope and perameters: THE PRIMARY OBJECTIVE OF THE PART TIME AQUATICS DIRECTOR WILL BE TO ORGANIZE, DIRECT, IMPLEMENT AND COORDINATE THE CITY'S AQUATICS PROGRAM AT BOTH THE EDGEWOOD POOL AND LAKESIDE PARK BEACH WHILE COORDINATING AND INTERFACING WITH THE SCHOOL DISTRICT AND SURROUNDING MUNICIPALITIES. The major areas of accountability for Ms. Thielen will be as follows: 1. Responsible for the supervision, hiring, and evaluation of all beach and pool personnel including lifeguards, water safety instructors, applicable maintenance personnel and related aquatics employees. 2. Responsible for scheduling the working hours, rotation and staff needs of all aquatic personnel at both the pool and swimming beach area. 3. Assign work duties to assure that all related waterfront activities are addressed in an efficient and effective manner to include lifeguarding, first aid, maintenance and general pool cleanliness. 4. Responsible for preparation of all time sheets, Red Cross certification cards and other written materials as requested by the Director of Parks, Recreation and Forestry. 5. Responsible for establishing and creating an in-house train- ing program for all aquatics personnel to include but not limited to rules, regulations, safety procedures, use of safety equipment, general pool and beach techniques. 6. Responsible for coordinating with related agencies involved with the Edgewood Community Center and pool program to include but not limited to municipal recreation departments, USSR swim club, local community groups, civic organizations and local businesses. 7. Direct and coordinate the preparation of a year-round swim- ming program which will be mailed to all school district residents promoting swimming opportunities available through- out the city and school district. 8. Oversee a variety of public relations activities designed to make the most effective use of available promotional possi- bilities through local media, flyers, school announcements, letter correspondence, etc. and follow through to evaluate, to the possible extent the success of such endeavors. -2- ge r t ie ewood 9 coordinaCommunity Center opool landcLakeside aPack of faility Beach to include pool rentals and other special pool activities. lU. Initiate and control all supply equipment purchases to es replenish existing inventoriram�implementation nd provide landnassurems necessary for effective progworkiny condition. thht they are in good 11, 8stablish necessary policies and procedures required to insure all required paper work is maintained for the proper and efficient running of the aquatics program including clearly preparation of well documented reports thant Of rticpationaenThey existing program activity ateinformation identifying reports should include supporting ram and accountability for administration Of each etcprogram re- lated employee lists, budget 12. in addition, Ms. Thielen will work towards accomplishing entitledl the objectives as Outlined dtLChd1C@CtOra ndum YeS pO nsibiliaies", "proposal for possible ay as noted in Addendum A. 13• estraction #o tlined1innAddendumtBrwhichwishtheejoint 1 powers agreement with the school district providing coordination of the pool programs on a school district ^ wide basis. In return for the aforementioned services from Ms. Thielen, the e following: City of Mounds View hereby agrees to th 1, Provide reimbursement for the proposed activities at an annual 000.00 per year to be paid in twenty-six equal rate of 59,iod. increments of $346.15 per pay per 2. The hourly work schedule will be (September through May) 15 hours per week for 39 weeks equivalent toosted 585 hors. ld be Approximately half of these hours wg flexible. hours with the remaining hours being ust 3. The hours during teC weekhforf13June weeksthrough 585uhours based on will be 45 hours p approximately 5 hours per full-time Monday through Friday with weekend. 4, We will provide 5 days of vacation during her first year as well as sick leave to be accrued at the rate of 6 days per year. Ball offices on Monday, Wednesday, Thielen including the City g We will provide office space at three locations for s. and Friday, - Park ad3eachdPCommunity Center pool office and the -3- i 6. Ms. Thie.len will be classified as a "regular part-time employee" as outlined in Chapter 6.04-2 of the Mounds View City Code. 7. The City will provide a $10,000.00 term life insurance policy at their expense. The aforeoutlined memorandum of understanding is hereby entered into on the 22nd day of August between the City of Mounds View and Ms. Maureen Theilen. The agreement will be in effect for the period of one year commencing August 22, 1983 through August 22, 1984. The agreement may not• be cancelled by either party unless their is cause for dismissal from the position by the City of Mounds View due to malfeasance, theft or the like. Hereby agreed to on August 22, 1983 by: Duane WT MMcCarty, Mayor Donald F. Pauley Clerk -Administrator Bruce K. Anderson, Director Maureen Thielen Parks, Recreation and Forestry Aquatics Director ADDENDUM A MAUREEN TNIELEN ADDITIONAL AQUATIC DIRECTOR RESPONSIBILITIES: I. Evaluate and revise the current Edgewood pool/Lakeside Park beach operations and physical facility, for optimal efficiency and safety. 11. Review and revise the current swimming lesson structure. A. Program planning: 1. Examine lesson time, length of class, instructor/student ratio, instructor pay scale, demand/supply of each class level. B. Organize and update instructor/lifeguard in-service manual. 1. Unification of skill requirement, emergency procedures, CPR. C. Devise individual "report card" check -off sheets for each swim class level, D. Inventory current supplies/equipment available, and provide additional items, necessary for a safe aquatic environment. E. Evaluate current instructor/guard evaluation forms, and design public input/evaluation forms. II1. Initiate, organize and carry out corporate fitness programs emphasizing, but not limited to, the available aquatics facilities. IV. Propose school district wide after school, weekend and summer long aquatics program planning coordination, and supervision. V. Evaluate and update current aquatics curriculum; and establish an open communication channel with the school administrators. A. Build an indirect feeder system for the park and recreation/U.S.S.A. team aquatics program. VI. Work in an advisory capacity to the Mounds View U.S.S.A. team. A. Coordinate the scheduling of team practice time with other community aquatics programs. VI1. Research, develop, and implement new aquatic and related programs. A. Possibilities include, but are not limited to: 1. Slimnastics (water exercise) course 2. Swimmer's Conditioning Club a. Strokework clinic - improves lap swimmer's technique b. Posted workouts - for independent "masters" competitive swimmers 3. Total fitness program a. Nutrition classes b. Organized stretching program c. Free weights d. Underwater body fat count testing e. Jogging trails f. Swimmer's Conditioning Club 4. handicapped aquatics program 5. Mile -charters club 6. Advanced Diving 7. Private Lessons MEMO TO: Mounds View City Council FROM: Bruce K, Anderson, Director Parks, Recreation and Forestry Dept. DATE: August 18, 1983 RE: Review of bid proposals for. 1984 one -ton dump truck Staff repared bid specifications and forwarded them to approxi- mately 60 local truck and automobile firms in the metropolitan area fo- the purchase of a one -ton dump truck. Bid proposals were received from ten firms for the purchase of a one -ton dump and chassis as well as two bid options for a winch and boom and electric 8-foot ball. The bids ranged from a low of $11,087.45 to a high of $13,067.00. Staff would recommend the purchase of the 1984 GMC truck model number TC31403, bid as specified at the low bid cost of $11,087.45. In addition staff would recommend that we add the additional $234.00 for the La Hass Box, which is a much higher quality box than the L&Z Box from a number of perspectives, but one major difference is going from a twelve -gauge to a ten -gauge steel. Total cost of the truck chassis and dump box would then be $11,321.45, still $165.00 below the second low bid price from L&Z Company, In addition, staff would recommend that the Venturo 2000 Crane offered by L&Z at $695.00 and their heavy duty snow plow at $1,285.00 be purchased as the two low bid options. Staff recommends these two purchases as they are also the two low bids and would add an additional $1,980.00 to the bid price which would then be a total of $13,301.45. Staff has budgeted $15,000.00 for the purchase of the vehicle and would furhter recommend that the additional $1,700.00 be utilized to purchase a two-way radio for the vehicle at $650.00 and stobe and safety lighting as an additional $200.00 option or a total of $853.00. Staff feels that the remaining $700.00 would allow us to convert the vehicle to propane and any other minor changes that may be required to the vehicle such as; painting if we are not able to get the orange paint in stock. Even with all of these aforemen- tioned modifications, staff still feels that the project will come under the $15,000.00 budgeted. In addition, staff has attached a copy of a listing of all our existing vehicles in fleet including the department they are assigned to, the vehicle number, the year, the general description, their percentage uses, as well as needs and voids with the equipment. Staff will be on hand at Monday evening's council meeting to discuss any questions you may have regarding the equipment or the bid proposals that were received by the City on Wednesday afternoon, DeFt• _ ^' ::imoer ':ear Conbition Ise Uses need and/or voids Streets 119 80 Chev. Good gu8 Used primarily by foreman,'c ck Malibu streets, pick up and delivery ar general use for all departments Streets 121 Ford 3/4 Excellent 75% Used for plowing now in City Hal pickup shop lots, crosswalks, ice rinks 77 4x4 cul de sacs. Used in parks for w/ plow trees, pick up and delivery. Us as a back up vehicle for all dep Also used by police in snow emer Water 302 66 Chev. Fair 751 Used by all departments, hauling dump truck (engine rock, blacktop, cold mix, ag-lim needs some ballfield linedust, sod, black d work - not snow. No real void other than d critical) to the age of the vehicle it wou be feasible to put a plow on the The truck could be used for spot ing however. Water 304 66 Int. Poor condition 28 Uses are limited on this vehicle Drill truck but adequate locating water main breaks and & for small amt. post holes when we have frost in of use. ground and asphalt. voids - not for any other tasks in any other .Dater 314 Dodge 1; Fair daily Used daily for all phases of the pickup (Mechanically dept. as a second vehicle. Also < sound) new 350- 1982 GMC. Excellent coni Needs front replacement for old 315 in water end work & which is now in parks. brakes. Sewer 205 Flexrodder old 0% Formally used as a sewer cleaninc of equipment. My suggestion is i should be sold as not used in the 4 years and would see no reason t it would ever be used as we have sources if we should have trouble our jet rodder. Sewer 225 Sewer Jet- Excellent 85% Uses include cleaning sanitary se rodder storm sewer, repairing water main 1979 Ford breaks, vacuuming up glass from t streets, power washing lift stati r y flushing down streets, wetttall r diamonds, watering sod. No voids. Sewer 203 1980 ' S Excellent Pickup Daily Routine uses for all phases of sewer maintenance tasks. No voids. Sewer 204 Case loader Good 1966 75; Used in all depts. for loading aggregate, loading snow, leveling ballfields Pulling poasts, used in shop for pull- ing engines, snow removal. Voids are: lacking a bit in power for its size. Does not quite have the depth we need with the backhoe for repairing watermain breaks and sewer breaks. Could use a winch. Parks 401 1980 Toro Good Workmaster 70€ Ballfield maintenance, hauling trash, hauling supplies, general park use by part-time people. Does excellent job of light grading work also. Void: too small for heaving grading. Parks 406 1966 Inter- national Summer Used for entertaining kids strictly puppet wag. by the Parks Dept. Voids: is in need of new tires, some exhaust work, should have back up alarm bell, but is basically safe for use. Parks 407 408 Toro Grounds- Fair masters 80€ Uses include mowing grass, grooming ice rinks, blowing snow at city hall, shop and ice rinks. Voids: Both units are showing their age but are sound. We are spending increasing amounts in repairs and should be banking money for replacement of at least one in the future. Parks 418 1972 Chev. Poor 3/4 ton 30€ Mechanically needs work, body in poor condition. Used only as back up vehicle. Uses include hauling concrete, sand, brush, timber, used by summer crews for transporting C.E.T.A. people Hauling paints, paint brushes and endless • , 4 Although because of its unsatoond. it needs brakes badly and exhaust system. One door does not stay closed, It should be put into safe condition before it's returned to the street. Parks 417 1980 Chev Excellent 100% Used in all phases of parks work and 1/2 Ton tasks. Hauling sand, trees, cement, timber, lumber, pulling trailers. Voids: Possible could use a dump truck, with a winch perhaps. Parks / 720 Forestry 1980 Chev. Very good 85% Used by both Forester and shop (in winte)i Luv Economical. Used for hauling trees, misc. parks related tasks. Voids: Needs a bigger unit for the dump box. Also does not have enough frame work to pull a trailer or even a tree spade. City Hall 610 Ply. 79 Less than 40% Used primarily for pick up and delivery Volare fair needs tires, brakes, car pulls to the front when braking. Also is very uneconomical; uses a great deal of gas. Needs exhaust system. Total repairs are estimated at $450.00. Should be replaced with 80-81 Ford squads due to be transferred our of P.D. Car was to be sold 1 year ago so we haven't spent any amount of dollars to keep it in adequate condition. City HALL 611 Ford 81 Good Occassional Pick up and delivery uses mostly by Fairmont City Hall personnel, occassionaly 1 by shop personnel. City Hall 613 1980 Good Daily Used mainly by Building Insp. Chevette Does the job its needed for. i CITY 017 140U14DS VI LW 401 HIGHWAY 10 MOUNDS VIEW, M1111IL•S01'A 55112 1410 i'kuPh5A1. 1 up 0111: fu11 DUMiP IRUCY. 4/1111 12 1:1. CONTRACTOR Box 1' 1 RM NAME .._ .._. _.._ ADDRESS ----_-•,-- _-- PHONE NUMBER 111•:hl kl:Pl•:IiSLNIATIVE Firm Ar4 IL< 1 O�ht s t] 1•iB9C�L_ I BP'fiONS I L ASS 3/Uz co i Of y F , b a f41/ r.dF3�"0r S I o 1. p/07,re I d& l /p eMtih i i pj 6 L& AA Rkb) 'FF t/yof 69c ems 1, //P (36 I alp �16 me Disa I r. dif°3 I 12. I I TOTAL DID PRICE FOR TRUCK AND DUMP BOX (EXCLUDING DID OPTIONS) GUARANTEED DELIVERY DATE DID BOND ENCLOSED VEHICLE WARRANTY r• r Larry Hauglle I I fIeel salef MOUNDSAN# ONTRUCKCENTER G-ME TI RUri�lrC �edr 0001 al0adway, N E IS I Mmneap0s• Minn 55415 612-378-3406 ONE TON DUMP TRU FIRM NAME ADDRESS PHONE NUMBER FIRM REPRESCNTATIVC 5. 6. MAKE NODEL OPTIONS INCLUDED I )\�_ � �'Z Ems' . > , •.,� Cam, Lt ;� II 't TOTAL BID PRICE FOR TRUCK AND DUMP BOX (EXCLUDING BID OPTIONS) $ y\ ar,�r,4 A S GUARANTEED DELIVERY DATE DID BOND ENCLOSED VEHICLE WARRANTY ��, —V a1X - 2 - DID OPTIONS 0 I. WINCH AND IIOOM - [III' MINII-IU14 DISTANCE THE 00014 SIiOULD EXTEI, FROM IHE DUMP BOX IS 48" AND WINCH MUST IIAVE A MINIMUM LIFTING CAPACITY OF ONE TON. BID OPTION NI PRICE $ h•\? l.`)> ` V1 2. ELECTRIC 8 FOOT PLOW WITH TILT A14D GUIDE.r�`� BID OPTION 02 PRICE L Z l4 BID PROPOSAL FORM SHOULD BE NAILED TO: BRUCE K. ANDERSON, DIRECTOR MOUNDS VIEW PARKS, RECREATION AND FORESTRY DEPT. 21101 HIGHWAY 10 MOUNDS VIEW, MINNESOTA 55112 (612) 7811-3055 1 E r 3575 SINE IIWIIWAY 13 p L a H aDEB Mfg. & Sales, Inc. %T. PAJL. MINNUOT1165122 .TRUCK and UTILITY EQUIPMENT STEEL FABRICATORS 1.7N Y7AM 1300:102•03-17 410NE: 10a'1a 4n@•19a1 IRtn__ l'I'Y_Op..MOIINIjti.Vlt{1J... __ DATE-AtIntwL.15,_1'183.._.._.._.-_. --- AODnEss... 01_.II1CNUAY 10 ___ _ (, kry, ATIuN CITY -- _ ..- ----- 1•IOUNDS...V1EW,..hIN. sw 1) pvcmuut 1113.14CNUM111it ATJN:_ _Bruce Anderson _ DELIVERY _ — -=_' In UCK AIAKE ' -YCAII NOall I--tNil ttl:A C(A MAN IAISSMI I �_ QTY PRODUCT DESCRIPTION 1' ONE LA MASS SM..LL CONTRACTORS PACKAGE INNG X 88" 14I111's sid s to be 15, hiep, .122E slard crost r x I iu1 lux t}7e ° idn brKrw and stake tickets fn7u and rmr 1 t, ••Ctt floor ;x: 10 W tab p LILe hmdinar,i to top of cab, full widthre nr.-li window with full gucv tts tailgate to be 21" high, 10 puge sort construction, 3/8" strc�5 proofmmd ser drains r; r with lever action top pin relt:aw A(AE: Lai lyre Lu Lr double acting type ' ' " ;' understncture to be 6" stnactunl sl(xt1 cicnun•I IIxa1g Ix,orc with .i rl•acttlrral steel chmi erommuldem on 14" omtern __— ---- met flaps rear of rear tiras lipjis to nul-L 1),(1.'I'. slxYil'irutilxl IlH hoist to be Irm lby nrxlel 445, double acting, uttlerlxxly, calrx•ity 9 L1xa, with -safety prop for servicing NOTE: unit to be electric over hydraulic TOTAL PRICE NO F.E.T. SALES TAX EXEMPT 0s+47W OPTIONAL FRAME REINFORCEMENT FOR CIIEV OR CMC ADD $85.00 IJIAl71 D(111 701313 m0Ul Vw 7Qy2* boon to be q ` wira rope to to 25' of 3/16" air craft cable with laook, control to be 20' coil cord rnl,ee Cype� 9p r' MUNITNG 70 BE 71Tr A 1.11611 SO(BEr, 0k`N1D ON Iifllll•R RIQn' O1 m-r sm. Q7 7Rlbf DOX TOTAL PRICE NO F.E.T. SALES TAX EXIiMPT � M-SHN 8' &VOd PIOJ, 11jits, purr angle, Mirk T1 fA ulcctric hydraulic lift xlth da<h a NO F.li.'f. SALES TAX EXEPiI''f p,Q,p OUR IILAN'I' TOTALPRICE IiIS IS A QUOTATION ONLY SALES TAX MUST BE ADDED WFIEN APPLICABLE LITERATURE ENCLOSED 0 BY: ,j rx 1 g I L,� _.. _..i, .... . ....'• I sl,:c,.d p, ;iul tauioh: to lilt heavy eau a from Ote .p cur h:.. UODY l:9DTl1 LONG IAAII,S. ChOSS rl,Lh1111715. FLOO11 MAIIIIIAL: SIDE MAI LRIAL: HEADBOARD IIEIGIIT. LIGHTS: SIDES: CAFE: PAIIIT; lililt .l 9 for shml 1v 11., II' LA HASS MANUEACTIMING F. SALES INC. 9575Highway 13,St Paul,M11111 sola551'UV1'.l;.1,2l:e1 hill I' la 1.90e 392 0:11r I rt lYdh Ilse power ladgate you can sul! dulnp ton, same as a regular gate Side can be made to drop lot easy hand or fon:ldt loading, either side or both. Hinges have grease fillings. ;.;,•.t 10 gm.. OPERATING and SAFETY FEATURES of MODEL CA 2000 •360 deyrec m.� ..... . .�... sell lubrIC!" •The 17 �. .. .,.�In mount. Typ,:6 P. , .."lace muuot or coat.,.. • r g locations on i r •- , • Removable I!, :. ..Jnlril prevents unauthorized np.••.:..�n. OPERATING and SAFETY FEATURES of MODEL CT 2003 • 360 degree rotation with 6 position base lock to hold the mast firmly in posihsn while in use and while traveling. • Rotation bearings require no lubrication. • Choice of telescopic booms 3 to 5.4 to 7 or 5' to 9. See chart for capacities. • Each boom position clearly marked for capacity and snatch block use. • Swivel snatch block for heavier loads or more precise control is standard equipment. • Removable pendant control on 20coil cord prevents unaulhoritod operation. • Choice of mounting socials: type A recessed. Type C surface or combination lot nnritiple mounting locations on one or more trucks. • The 1200 lb. capacity winch is equipped with 35 of',';' aircraft cable will: hook @0'with 5 to 3 boom) ACCESSORIES • Swivel snatch block lot maximum capacity or more precise load control, • Ouiek disconnect battery coblo p!ugR social. • 110 or 200 volt A.C. motor for stationary use. • Additional sockets for multiple mounting locations. WITH 22 YEARUF PLOW MANUFACTURING ...XPERIENCE WE PROUDLY PRESENT LmZm HEAVY DUTY SNOW PLOWS ACCESSORIES Q MOULDBOARD 12 GAUGE HEIGHT WITH 0" CUTTING EDGE, 29" HEIGHT, LENGTH OF MOULDBOARD 72"•78"•84"•90"•96„ HEAVY DUTY HITCH AND LIFT FRAME 300 APPROXIMATE ANGLE LEFT AND RIGHT CUTTING EDGE 3/8" X G" REVERSABLE •; I RAISED PLOWING LIGHTS HI & LO BEAM WITH TURN SIGNALS 3/4" X 2" ROLLED BAR TURN TABLE WITH MAXI•S'I'OPS MONARCH HEAVY DUTY HYDRAULIC TURN CYLINDERS BOTTOM ANGLE IRON 4" X 3" X 3/8" HEAVY DUTY 8PRI,!n,9 MEMO TO: Mayor and C1ty Counc' ) FROM: Clerk -Administrator _ DATE: August 18, 1983 \ SUBJECT: FEDERAL CABLE TV LEGISLATION Attached please find a letter received from the City of Fridley regarding legislation presently being considered by the Federal government to remove control of Cable TV from local governments. This issue has been previously discussed by the Mounds View City Council at the July 18th Agenda Session at which time staff was directed to refer the matter to the North Suburban Cable Commission. The North Suburban Cable Commission has kept abreast of this matter and on several occasions corresponded with our Federal representatives to indicate the objections of the Cable Commission to this legislation. Staff would request Council direction as to your desire to adopt a resolution such as that adopted by the City of Fridley. DFP/pf Attachment t nib: i.yt'�;�� I u�l ;!;, ;II1 AYNIIr vl FPRIOLEY IIIbIEY. ?AINN150TA 554m2 W ,f( •�If 11:PNONE ,1:,571•34�� }r;r August 15, 1983 Dear Mayor: our City Council has just adopted the enclosed Resolution and we ask for your support. It seeks to defend our city powers in CATV franchising. This spring the U.S. Senate passed Senate File 166, known as the Goldwater CATV Deregulation Bill, and sent it to the House of Representatives for their approval. The Goldwater Bill takes from you and your city many of the franchising powers the state has given you, and in most cases leaves your citizens at the mercy of "benevolent" CATV operators to determine rates they will charge for this monopoly service and the local services they will provide as a condition of using city property and right-of-way. And worse, you are effectively denied the right to seek better offers from competing CATV companies at the end of your present franchise. You never get another chance at getting a better deal for your people. The Goldwater Bill (S.F. t66) is an almost total assault on our local municipal authority regarding CATV. It's crippling. The U.S. Conference of Mayors has come out strongly in opposition to this legislation as being a totally unjustified taking of local powers by the federals. I ask that you and your Council join us in that opposition. We have to inores5 ggr own Qngressmen this summer, right now, that we reject this unwarrented assault by the federals. Please adopt some version of this Resolution and get it to your Congressman ... to all Minnesota Congressmen... and ask your legislators for support because it is also preempts state powers. Cinraraly William J. VTee Mayor W Wla Enclosure 0 #0 STATF OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF ANOKA ) ss CITY OF FRIDLEY ) I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified Deputy City Clerk of the City of Fridley, Minnesota, and acting on behalf of and in the absence of Sidney C. Inman, City Clerk of the City of Fridley, do hereby certify that 1 have carefully compared the attached extract from the Minutes of a Council meeting of the City Council of the City of Fridley held August 8, 1983 with the original on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Fridley, Minnesota, and the same is a full, true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to: RESOLUTION NO. 70 - 1983 RESOLUTION OPPOSING SENATE FILE 66 (aka THE GOLDW.4TER CATV DEREGULATION BILL), AND URGING THE DEFEAT OF ANY COMPANION PROPOSAL IN THE U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES WITNESS MY HAND as the Deputy City Clerk of the City of Fridley, Minnesota, and the seal of said City, this _ 12th day of August. 1983 DE UTYC1tY YCLERKR DOF THE CITY OF FRIDLEY (SEAL) RESCLIIPICN ND. 70 - 1983 RFS(LITTIM OPEOSRU SENATE FILE 66 (aka THE G3XWATER CAW DMWJIATILN BIIM r AND UFCI u THE DEFEAT OF ANY COPMILN pR0PCM IN THE U.S WJSE OF WRESENIATNFS Cable Television is a local system using municipal property and WHkRFAS, municipally held easements over private property; and WHEREAS, Cable Television is, by its nature and ty virtue of public need, a local, not a national communications medium; and WHEREAS, local and state governments have been successful in providing a full developmn reasonable regulatory framework for the to serve local consumers; and WHERM, there has been no showing of any overriding national interest in be accommodated within the present system of Cable Television which cannot state/local regulation; and that governmental powers are best exercised at the local wH_rP A5, we assert level unless an overwhe7ning national interest cannot be fulfil led by state and local governments; and WHEREAS, 5.66 (aka The Goldwater Bill) strips stay andof selocal gvice for their most authority they now have to secure good Cable to the harm of both. communities and their constituents, IT RISMVED by the City Council of the City of Fridley that: NOW, THEREFORE BE 1. There is no justification for the Federal Goverrunent to preempt state and local authority over Cable Television. 2. powers to regulate local systems are best exercised by local units of government. 3. 5.66 (aka The Goldwater Bill) is an unjustified and unwise intrusion of Federal Government in a local manner. 4. The Fridley City Council calls on all members of the U.S. House of held state and local Representatives to protect and preserve presently that local Cable Television systems satisfy local authority to assure community interest. 5. Copies of this Resolution be circulated to all members of Congress and other interested parties. CITY OXWM OF THE CITY OF ERMLEY THIS 8TH DAY OF pA= AND ADOY"Ill BY THE AIJ=1 1983. WILLIAN J. NEE - MAYOR 0 ATIFST: Soo C. I2M - CITY CLERK MEMO TO: Mayor and City CounWl FROM: Clerk -Administrator DATE: August 18, 1983 SUBJECT: FRIDLEY HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE Attached please find a letter from Fridley Mayor William J. Nee outlining the results of the Hearing Examiner's Report on the proposed hazardous waste processing facility in the City of Fridley. Although the Hearing Examiner acknowledged the concerns sited by the City of Fridley and other testifiers regarding the advisability of a hazardous waste site at the proposed location, she did not recommend that the site be removed from the list of preferred areas. Therefore, the Minnesota Waste Management Board will be considering the Hearing Examiner's Report at a meeting on Wednesday, August 24th, at 3:30 p.m. Attached please find a copy of the Agenda for the Waste Management Board Meeting on August 24th and 25th. Staff has been advised by Waste Management Board staff that action will be taken by the Waste Management Board on Thursday, August 25th, with a press conference being held at 2:00 p.m. on that date. It would appear that the Waste Management Board will be making their final determination at that time for recommendation to the State Legislature as required by Statute. Staff will attend these meetings and, if public testimony is allowed, reiterate the position taken by the City of Mounds View at all previous meetings on this matter. DFP/pf Attachments CITY OF FRI©'L5 N 6431 UN IV RSITY AV i N IIE N.F., FRIDL E Y, MIN NE SOIA 554J7 TELEPHONE �611.511•J45n June 16, 1983 71I, I w• nil t I qa, Dear Frield(s): Thank you for the Interest you have shown in the whole matter of locating a hazardous waste processing facility in our City. Your involvement was an indication of the strong public feeling stout this issue, and I want to bring you up to date on recent developments. Recently the Hearing Examiner, Phyllis Reha, submitted her report and recommendation to the Minnesota Waste Management Board. Although she noted the objections to the Fridley site which were brought out in the April 19 hearings, She SW D9r re99D®eDd that the Fridley Ae be Lenny I= 1'& list 91 P[Eterr areas. Inclosed you will find an extract from the !fearing Examiner's Report containing her conclusions acd re a erdations. Me City Council continues to oppose the designation of Fridley as a preferred site for these sane reasons. However, there is no assurance that the Waste Management Board will be any more receptive to then- arguments now than they have been in the past. What can be done? If you share the City Council's opposition to a hazardous waste processing facility in Fridley, first, I urge you to write to the Board at the following address and send a copy to your State Legislators and to Governor Perpich: h`}/� cc� 1� d / Minnesota Waste Management Board ri, V 1 c/o Robert G. Dunn, Chairman ?Crystal, Minnesota 551 8 �`1 uu'�lLL'11` k.—:�°;cyi r 1plephone 53"816 ),orn 5.�rn J �'�Jltu Now, more than ever, concerted action by involved citizens is necessary in order to prevent Lit,: danger not only to residents of Fridley, but also to our neighbors in surrounding canalnities. There isn't much tire left. Please write today. Sincerely, [&& - • lv- William .7. Mayor of Fridley WJN/la Enclosure I, P,S, The following are the addresses of the Governor and the State Legislators representing Fridley: Rudy Perpidh Don Frank Sharon Coleman Walahe SLmneau Governor Senator Representative Representative 130 State Capitol G•20 State Capitol 261 St. Office Bld, 299C St, Office Bid. St. Paul, MN 55155 St, Paul, MN 55155 St. Paul, MN 55155 St. Paul, MN $5155 296-3391 296-2877 296-2721 296-4331 Extract from the IIIT0111. OF'I'llli IICAIUNG IM1,11YIih in the Matter of the Proposed Ila:ardous—haste Processing facility Area in the City of Fridley'. ------_----- __ Qt,CU)S10t5 1. Pursuant to Ilimm. stet. 4 115A.09 (1982), this hearing -a neither a rvfemakirg proceeding nor a contested case proceeding. The hearing was Cm- ducted so as to afford all interested persons an opportunity to ask questions, testify and present evidence on the subject matter. 2. The Minncsaa Pollution Control Igeny fulfilled its statutory obliga- tions by preparing a suitability report on the proposed area. 3. The Minnesota Paste Management Board has complied with all substantive and procedural requirements of law. The Board and the Hearing Dwiner have jurisdiction in this matter. 4. Any of the foregoing findings which should more properly be deemd Conclusions arc hereby ,.C.cR td as such. aa. s.d upon the foregoing Conclusions, the Hearing Dcaminer makes the fol- lawing: :OgIw1AN_ �a 'hat the Minnesota Vbste Management Board, whan it considers which pro- posed areas to be, included in the final inventory of preferred areas, give special consideration to the following items: a. The naturally high water table and the rapid permeability rate of is the soils in the proposed area: b. The storm sewer drainage system which discharges storm runoff into the surface water stream that discharge into the Mississippi River; c. The existence of municipal water intakes on the Mississippi River; d. Municipal well development directly adjacent to the proposed area; e. The accident rate of the transportation access to the Proposed area: f. The proximity of the proposed site to residential development; g. The absence of a natural aquiclude to protect a significant sur- ficial aquifer locata'1'Irthe proposed area; h. The proximity of city parks and recreation areas within and im- mediately adjacent to the proposed arelif 1. The lack of seder service in a small portion in the nui Lit of t -- proposed area; and J. The risks attending an accident 'fnvolvirg. hazardous wastes at or in transit to and near the area. Bated: June 9 , 1983. Hearing laminar August 12, 1983 4 MINNESOTA WASTE MANAGEMENT BOARD AGENDA ..� SIXTY-SEVENTH REGULAR MEETING r ATE: August 24-25, 1983 (Wednesday and Thursday) TIME: 8:00 A.M. (both days) PLACE: Room 83, State Office Building, St. Paul W DN MAY: 8:00 A.M. GENERAL 1. Agenda Review 6 Adoption 2. Approval of Minutes - July 28, 1983 3. Chairman's Report 4. Staff Reports 5. Hazardous Waste Management Planning Council Report 6. Local Project Review Committee Reports 7. Processing Areas Task Force Report 8. Special Advisory Task Force Report 9. Items by Board Members 9:00 DISCUSSION - Review Hearing Records for Proposed Processing Facility Inventory Areas in Metropolitan area (includes up to 15 minutes of public testimony on each area). 9:00 Cottage Grove 9:30 Forest Lake 10:00 Minneapolis 10:30 St. Paul 11:00 Roseville 11:30 Plymouth 12:00 RECESS FOR LUNCH 2:00 P.M. DISCUSSION (CONTINUED) - Processing Facility Hearing Records 2:00 Shakopee 2:30 Inver Grove Heights 3:00 Rosemount 3:30 Fridley 4:00 Lakeville 4:30 Hastings 5:00 Ramsey 11 5:35 ADJOURN NOTE: Board members will have dinner together at 6:00 P.M. at the St. Paul o e ("Board Room") following adjournment of Wednesday's meeting. (See over for second -2- THURSDAY: ? 8:00 A.M. DISCUSSION - Brief Review of All Processing Facility Inventory Areas 10:00 ACTION - Adoption of Inventory of Preferred Areas for Processing Facilities in Metropolitan Area 12:00 RECESS FOR LUNCH 2:00 P.M. PRESS CONFERENCE - Room 4, State Capitol Building 3:00 ACTION - Reduction in Size of Crystalline Bedrock Study Areas 4:30 ACTION - Possible Extension of Fergus Falls' Contingencies Deadline 5:00 TENTATIVE ARRANGEMENTS FOR NEXT MEETING: Date: September 8, 1983 (Thursday) Time: 8:30 A.M. Place: Tentative - State Capitol, St. Paul 5:05 ADJOURN OTHER MEETINGS SCHEDULED: August 26, 1983 - Hazardous Waste Management Planning Council - 8:30 A.M., . at Board Offices, Crystal August 31, 1983 - Processing Areas Task Force (PATF), -,1:00 P.M., at Board Offices,. Crystal Sept. 9, 1983 - Solid Waste Management Advisory Council - 1:00 P.M., at Board Offices, Crystal (Tentative) MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council rFROM: Director of Public Works/Community Development DATE: August 13, 1983 SUBJECT:, AGENDA ITEMS 13, 14 AND 15 Item 13 On August 16, 1983 at 2:30 p.m., I received a verbal report that the MnDOT state materials engineer is recommending against our proposed resurfacing project and suggests that a reconstruction project be considered instead. At this time, staff is still sorting out the impact of this recommendation. Item 14 As result of above action, staff is proposing to separate 1983 seal coating project and start it as soon as possible. All the necessary forms and quantities have not been verified but will be ready Monday evening. Item 15 Desired materials from consultants for the Miller project will not be available until Monday afternoon. Therefore, staff memo will be prepared then. JCJ/bc MEMO TO: Clerk -Administrator and City Council FROM: Engineering/Planning Technician DATE: August 18, 1983 SUBJECT: PROGRAMMED LAND FINAL PLAT Attnehed plenso find the final plat for Prngrnmmcd Land. This item was reviewed by the Council at the June 27, 1983 meeting and the Council at that meeting decided to wait ontiL a copy of the final plat was in hand before approval of the resolutions to approve the development agreement and copies of the final plat took place. Copies of the development agreement were distributed for the June 27th meeting. Attached are copies of Resolution Nos. 1625 and 1626 approving development agreement execution and the final plat for adoption at this time. Should you have any questions or need copies of the development agreement, please contact me. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution No. 1625 and 1626. f FJK/bc RESOLUTION NO. 1625 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINIJESOTA RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FINAL PLAT OF PROGRAMMED LAND, INC. WHEREAS, the Mounds View Planning Commission has reviewed the preliminary plat for the motel site as proposed for the west part of Lot 2, Block 3, Programmed Land First Addition and has recommended approval to the City Council on May 4, 1983, by adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. 74-83; and WHEREAS, the Mounds View City Council has reviewed the preliminary plat and has given conceptual approval on May 23, 1983, by adopting Resolution No. 1607; and WHEREAS„ Resolution No. 1607 stated that prior to the City Council approving the final plat, :the necessary documents dedicating the required drainage easements and Rice Creek Watershed District approval be received; and WHEREAS, the drainage easement description has been submitted and found to be acceptable; and WHEREAS, approval has been received from the Rice Creek watershed District; NOW, THEREFORE, BE I'T RESOLVED that the Council of the City of Mounds View approves the final plat for Programmed Land, Inc. Adopted this 22th day of August, 1983. ATTEST; (SEAL) Mayor Clerk -Administrator RESOLUTION NO. 1626 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION EXECUTING DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 83-61 WHEREAS, Chapter 59.07 of the Mounds View Municipal Code requires a development contract (Agreement No. 83-61) for the approval of the 98 unit motel at 2149 Program Avenue; and WHEREAS, the development contract (Agreement No. 83-61) has been drafted and is attached to this resolution; and WHEREAS, the Developer and the City agree with all conditions of the development contract (Agreement No. 83-61); NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View City Council authorizes execution of the agreement with the required signatures. Adopted this 22th day of August, 1983. ATTEST: (SEAL) Mayor Clerk -Administrator CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW CITY COUNCTI, WORK SESSION G:00 p.m. 1. Discussion with John Johnson regarding Director of Public Works/ Community DevclopmcnL position. AGENDA SESSION 7:00 p.m. 1. Consideration of staff memorandum regarding Water Resources Board Meeting. 2. Goal Setting - Where do we go from here? 3. Consideration of 1984 Water and Sewer Budget. 4. Continued discussion of 19R4 General Fund Budget and related issues - please be prepared to discuss the 1984 Budget and your concerns. 5. Consideration of staff memorandum regarding Dynamic Designers Development Proposal. gte4&, I MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Clerk -Administrator DATE: August 24, 1983 SUBJECT: WATER RESOURCES BOARD MEETING Attached please find a letter received by the City from the Minnesota Water Resources Board indicating that meeting will be conducted at 1:00 p.m. on Monday, September 19, 1983, for the purpose of receiving input on the issue of whether the number of managers of the Rice Creek Watershed District should be increased as authorized by Minnesota Statutes. Staff would request Council direction regarding any input you ;could wish to be made on behalf of the City at that meeting. DFP/pf Attachment W21 716 •1140 ter/ .ti\^ f {Ja ill.. yd 1y.+��1r k 2 6a+ STATE OF MINNESOTA a CO WATER R'SOURCES BOARD J�QS 555 Wabasha Street 68(95 Room 206 St. Paul, Minnesota 55102 August 17, 1983 NOTICE OP MEETING TOCONSIDER AN INCREASE IN TIIF. NUMBER OF MANAGERS FOR THE. RICE CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT The Minnesota Water Resources Board will hold a meeting on September 19, 1983 in Conference Room A of the Capitol Square Building at 550 Cedar Street, St. Paul, Minnesota 55101, beginning al 1:30 p.m., for the purpose of receiving input on the issue of whether the number of managers of the Rice Creek Watershed District should be increased as authorized by Minnesota Statutes Section 112.42, Subdivision 3a. Slate law governing metropolitan watershed district boards of managers was amended in 1982 to allow an increase in the number of managers from five up to a maximum of nine. The Rice Creek Watershed District currently has five managers. Persons interested in this issue who do not wish to appear at the meeting are encouraged to send written recommendations to the Water Resources Board, 555 Wabasha Street, Room 206, St. Paul. Minnesota 55102, before September 19, 1983. Mel Sinn Acting Exectuive Director J .4w® MEMO TO: FROM: ATE: SUBJECT: Mayor and City Council Finance Director 'Treasurer Brager September 2, 1983 1984 UTILITY BUDGETS LI t4{ 4(13 Submitted for your consideration are projected 198,1 Water and Sewer Fund Income Statements. These statements are based upon 1984 Budgeted Revenues and Expenditures. WATER FUND REVENUES Water sales were estimated conservatively at 373,055,000 gallons and at the present rate of .70/l,00o gallons. This is 97.5% of the average water sold for the past nine years (382,621,000). An estimate lower than the 8a0veilrage ionwas gallonschosen frrombecause yearwater toyearsales have over the varied as much as 60 last five years. Penalties and interest have remained reeltivelystable thesampastlast three years. The amount budgeted is approximately year. Permits and connection fees are not subject to precise estimation. Budgeted figures are based upon historical averages. Meter is revenue received for the sale of a water meter for new construction or a sale to the new owner when an existing property changes hands. Budgeted revenue is based upon our first nded in mid - full year of experience (the water ordinance was amethat Investment income is projected at $60,000. This is higher than that sition improved which was budgeted for 1983 because the fund's cash po in 1982. Estimated 1984 is lower than 1981 and 1982 Actual due to the lower interest rates which have been paid this year compared to previous years. Total Estimated 1984 Water Fund revenues are $341,289. This is approximately $13,019 more than was estimated for 1983. EXPENDITURES Several revisions to first draft expenditure estimates have been made. Pursuant to Council direction at the August 29, 1903 budget work session aersonnel services have been budgeted at 38 above 1983 levels. other changes in personnel services include the deletion of one-fourth of the cost of a full-time maintenance position and the inclusion of a part-time position. The present draft maintains 1983 maintenance (� personnel staffing levels. -2- The personnel service accounts also reflect Council's desire to change from contracting for engineering services to having an in-house engineer. The Plater Fund's personnel service accounts reflect this by budgeting for its share an engineer's position which will be paid for from the General, Water, and Sewer Funds. Consequently, Account 4303, other professional services, was revised to reflect this change. Adjustments to budgeted motor fuels and lubricants, Account 4170, were made to reflect more closely average fuel consumption over the past several years. Total Water Fund expenditures for 1984 are estimated to be $329,072. This is an increase of $8,796 over 1983 budgeted expenditures of $320,276. The Water Fund is projected to have a net income of $12,217 for 1981. Plater sales are based upon present• rates of $0.70 por 1,000 gallons. Staff feels that there is no need for an adjust- ment of water rates in 1984. SEWER FUND REVENUES Sewer use fees are based upon present rates of $29.75 per REC per quarter and the five year average for the number of RECs billed. The five year average of RECs billed was used as RECs have varied as much as 135 RECs over the past five years. The five year average was felt to be a conservative estimate to use in projecting 1984 sewer use fees of $562,989. Connection fees and permits were estimated using historical averages. Investment income was estimated using an average cash balance of $80,000 and average interest earnings of 8%. Total Projected 1984 Sewer Fund revenues are $571,151. This is an increase of $1,810 over. 1983 budget revenues of $509,341. EXPENDITURES As was outlined in the commentary on the Water Fund,the following changes were made to personnel services: the one-fourth maintenance man position was deleted, a share of an engineer's position was added, and personnel service accounts reflect an increase of 3% over 1983 levels. -3- ' Estimated MI9CC costs are approximately $71,656 lower than originally anticipated. This is due to an estimated 1984 sewerage flow of 425 million gallons compared to the 1983 estimate of 445 million gallons and a credit of $38,139.25 for our 1982 billings being included in 1984 estimated costs. Motor fuels and lubricants were revised to more accurately reflect average fuel consumption over the past few years. This resulted in a reduction of the amount budgeted of $1,171. Maintenace which was included in the recently adopted Capital Improvements and Maintenance Plan is included in the line item maintenance program on the projected income statement•. During 1984, expenditures for the maintenance program will be accounted for in a new maintenance account in order that we may better monitor the program that was established. Total 1984 expenditures are estimated at $515,671. This is a reduction of $47,897 from 1983 budgeted expenditures. Reduced MWCC costs are primarily responsible for this reduction. The Sewer Fund is projected to have a net income of $55,480 for 1984. Staff feels that there is no need for an adjustment of sewer rates in 1984. Copies of revised individual budget pages will be handed out at Tuesday's Agenda Session. DB/pf CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW 700-120 WATER UTILITY ITEM DESCRIPTION PERSONNEL SERVICES 4010 SALARIES, REGULAR 4030 PENSIONS 4040 GROUP INSURANCE 4050 WORKERS COMPENSATION TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICES MATERIALS + SUPPLIES 4114 MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES 4125 SUPPLIES, UTILITIES TOTAL MATERI.ALS + SUPPLIES CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 4303 OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERV 4304 PROGRAM INSTRUCTt7RS 4323 MEM WPST CONE C0fM41 4330 POSTAGE 4343 PRINTING 4380 MILEAGE 4402 RENTAL, LAND TOTAL CONTRACIUAL SERVICES CAPITAL OUTLAY 4703 EQUIP,%= TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY MISC. D_SBURSEMENTS 4990 TRANSFERS OUT TOTAL MISC. DISBURSEMENTS TOTAL ADMINISTRATION • DEPARTMENTAL BUDGET DETAIL - 1984 EXPENDITURES ADMINISTRATION 1981 1982 1983 1983 DEPARTMENT ADMINISTRATOR COUNCIL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGETED 6 MONTHS REQUESTS RECOMMENDS APPFORS 7,247.08 7,736.04 8,092.00 3,734.40 8,653.00 15,445.00 760.94 812.28 987.00 392.12 909.00 1,764.00 361.44 621.92 660.00 418.45 885.00 1,278.00 8.29 14.92 16.00 .00 16.00 25.00 8,377.75 9,185.16 9,755.00 4,544.97 10,463.00 18,512.00 37.18 158.08 230.00 78.63 141.00 141.00 .00 .00 .00 414.35 .00 .00 37.18 158.08 230.00 492.98 141.00 141.00 3,430.61 5,986.15 10,686.00 6,541.87 12,028.00 5,528.00 1,714.05 1,863.50 2,475.00 .00 2,280.00 2,280.00 .00 511.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 1,387.50 1,715.39 2,300.00 1,130.00 2,187.00 2,187.00 529.94 951.71 655.00 89.64 940.00 940.00 10.30 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 7.50 .00 .00 .00 .00 7,072.40 11,035.25 16,116.00 7,761.51 17,435.00 10,935.00 .00 .00 362.00 4,297.50 .00 .00 .00 .00 362.00 4,297.50 .00 0.00 25,000.00 28,500.00 32,775.00 .00 36,053.00 36,053.00 25,000.00 28,500.00 32,775.00 0.00 36,053.00 36,053.00 40,487.33 48,878.49 59,238.00 17,096.96 64,092.00 65,641.00 CITY OF 10JNDS VIEW 700-12, WATER UTILITY ITEM DESCRIPTION PERSONNEL SERVICES 4010 SALARIES, REGULAR 4011 OVERTIME, REGULAR 4020 SALARIFS,TEMP+PART TIME 4030 PENSIONS 4040 GROUP INSURANCE 4050 WORKERS oCy4pENSATION 4060 UNEMPLOYMENT CCMP TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICES MATERIALS + SUPPLIES 4114 MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES 4121 SUPPLIES, BLDGS+GRNDS 4122 SUPPLIES, VEHICLE 4123 SUPPLIES, EQUIPMENT 4124 SUPPLIES, STREETS 4125 SUPPLIES, UTILITIES 4160 SUPPLIES, OPERATING 4170 MOTOR FUELS + LUBRICANTS 4240 UNIFORMS + CLOTHING TOTAL MATERIALS + SUPPLIES OCIIRACIUAL SERVICES 4303 OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERV 4310 CW NICATIONS-TELEPHONE 4321 ELECTRICITY 4322 NATURAL GAS 4325 TRAFFIC SIGNALS - ELECT 4341 LEGAL NOTICES 4Y2 ADVERTISEMENTS 4343 PRINTING 4355 TOWELS, RAGS, CLEANING 4361 MEMBERSHIPS 4362 CONFERENCES 4363 TRAINING 4401 RENTAL, EQUIPMENT 4511 REP.,BLDGS + GROUNDS 4513 REPAIRS, EQUIPMENT 4514 REPAIRS, STREET; 4515 REPAIRS, UTILITIES TOTAL (Y)%rnA,-mi,v .rn:........ DEPARTT ; BUDGET DETAIL - 1984 EXPENDITURES • OPERATIONS 1981 1982 1983 1983 DEPARTMENT ADMINISTRATOR ACTUAL ACIIJIVAL BUDGETED 6 hums REQUESTS RE'CGMMENDS COUNCIL APPROVES 37,345.48 40,938.84 42,548.00 19,130.69 50,463.00 44,015.00 3,582.00 4,800.00 8,800.00 1,112.00 3,216.00 7,216.00 4,526.63 4,933.17 5,303.00 2,499.43 6,296.00 5,642.00 1,749.65 2,267.60 2,640.00 1,744.20 3,983.00 3,540.00 2,312.14 3,208.07 3,133.00 .00 3,865.00 3,692.00 596.78 260.16 OU 850.00 51,817.56 58,017.32 63,509.00 25,494.02 68,968.00 65,228.00 .00 .00 .00 .OU 44.02 .00 362.78 547.18 1,210.00 456.27 1,272.00 1,273.00 319.45 185.68 271.00 243.50 400.00 395.00 483.80 556.07 590.00 142.62 1,016.00 1,018.00 1,333.64 1,324.29 1,447.00 52.50 3,150.00 3,143.00 5,038.28 7,735.98 5,934.00 7,593.83 9,510.00 10,810.00 4,256.89 7,163.04 6,537.00 2,577.24 8,537.00 8,785.00 3,155.64 2,739.04 3,816.00 537.94 3,016.00 2,787.00 387.70 395.26 445.00 193.20 511.00 449.00 15,338.18 20,646.54 20,250.00 11,841.12 27,412.00 28,660.00 2,140.94 12,906.29 3,100.00 12,726.59 11,048.00 6,601.00 906.43 1,124.72 1,700.00 519.74 1,700.00 1,700.00 38,400.04 51,274.57 42,700.00 20,437.90 46,970.00 46,970.00 6,865.80 8,452.46 8,500.00 21138.35 9,520.00 9,520.00 70.56 .00 .00 .00 .00 26.86 00 .00 ..00 00 .00 .00 .00 93.0 .00 60.60 .00 .00 .00 .000 .00 .00 14.00 00 ,pp .00 .00 .00 15.00 60.00 .00 00 660.00 0.00 40.00 .00 pp 60.00 60.00 204.50 150.00 .00 25.00 60.00 60.00 396.49 248.89 366.00 18.87 416.00 195.00 1 523.90 ,00 8.16.00 00 366.00 .00 500.00 240.00 75.10 840.10 1,020.00 226.44 1,120.00 1,120.00 750.00 2,015.26 2,400.00 .00 2,400.00 2,400.00 i,324.96 1,000.41 13,000.00 26,649.49 9,700.00 2,200.00 • CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW DEPARTMENTAL BUDGET DETAIL - 1984 EXPENDITURES 700-121 WATER UTILITY OPERATI(NJS ITEM DESCRIPTION 1981 1982 1983 1983 DEPARTMENT ADMINISTRATOR COUNCIL ACTUAL ACIUAL BUDGETED 6 MONTHS REQUESTS RECOMMENDS APPROVES CAPITAL OUTLAY 4703 EQUIPMENT 4704 VEHICLES 4795 DEPRECLITICN EXPE74SE TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY MISC. DISBURSEMENTS 4901 REFUNDS 4910 CONTINGENCY TOTAL MISC. DISBURSEMENTS TOTAL OPERATIONS .00 .00 4,500.00 5,448.00 34,680.00 6,930.00 .00 .00 9,200.00 9,059.44 .00 .00 93,105.00 97,675.00 9,525.00 .00 9,525.00 9,096.00 98,105.00 97,675.00 23,325.00 14,507.44 44,205.00 16,026.00 300.00 (210.00) .00 1,710.00 1,000.00 0.00 .00 .00 15,000.00 .00 15,000.00 16,063.00 300.00 (210.00) 15,000.00 1,710.00 16,000.00 16,063.00 --------------------•------------------------------------------------ 121,074.96 254,331.52 195,080.00 116,503.56 240,283.00 197,463.00 RL - ---------- JIS ---------- I ------------------- :;,�l c 71 �'l A :1 L;o 0� bV i 1 +1 goy wlb� 75,o 3s, It r;o 11�9511-57 1 3 67Z �mci ��:09 —'!' a3 qj�-1'11 II I In 063, JI .9 -;.Soo [IT D 7CZ II i . ........ II CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW DEPARTMENTAL BUDGET UEIAIL - 1984 EXPFSIDITURES SEWER UTILITY ADMINISTRATION 'RIPTION 1981 1982 1983 1983 DEPARIMI ENT ADMINISTRATOR COUNCIL ACIUAL ACIUAL BUDGETED 6 MONTHS REQUESTS RECUMMEMDS APPROVES ;VICES ES, REGULAR NS 7,247.08 7,736.04 8,092.00 3,734.40 8,653.00 15,445.00 INSURANCE 760.93 361.45 812.26 626.38 987.00 660.00 392.12 418.45 909.00 1,764.00 S COMPENSATION 8.29 14.92 16.00 885.00 16.00 1,278.00 NEL SERVICES 8,377.75 9,189.60 9,755.00 .00 4,544.97 10,463.00 25.00 18,512.000 UPPLIES FFICE SUPPLIES 4.92 .00 .00 .00 .00 US + SUPPLIES 4.92 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 MVICES ?ROFESSIONAL SERV MAST CONT COMM 3,420.28 278,294.26 4,612.39 323,448.09 10,686.00 354,754.00 3,202.74 12,028.00 5,528.00 782.50 730.87 1,208.00 206,939.39 490.00 376,039.00 1,134.00 304,383.00 1,134.00 NOTICES 'G 5.48 .0 .00 .00 .00 .00 144.70 191.30 227.00 66.84 330.00 330.00 LAND 2.80 .00 .00 7.50 .00 .00 .00 .00 TUAL SERVICES 282,650.02 328,990.15 .00 366,875.00 .00 210,698.97 .00 389,531.00 .00 311,375.00 NT OUM Y .00 .00 .00 101.50 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 101.50 .00 .00 2INCIPAL 4TEREST .00 4,666.67 .00 4,677.00 10,000.00 3,500.00 .00 1,925.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 kGENT FEES 150.00 175.00 150.00 100.00 2,800.00 175.00 2,800.00 175.00 tVICE 4,816.67 4,852.00 13,650.00 2,025.00 12,975.00 12,975.00 TENTS ICY (406.72) .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 ONS-OTHER P.GCYS .00 104.65 .00 .00 .00 15,000.00 .00 S OUT 15,000.00 .00 17,100.00 .00 19,665.00 .00 .00 .00 21,632.00 .00 21,632.00 SBURSEMENIS 14,697.93 17,100.00 19,665.00 0.00 36,632.00 21,632.00 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW DEPARIMENTAL. BUDGET DETAIL - 1984 EXPENDITURES f 730-121 SEWER UTILITY OPERATIONS ITEM DESCRIPTION 1981 1982 1983 1983 DEPARIMENT ADMINISTRATOR COUNCIL ACTUAL ACIUAL BUDGETED 6 MONIES REQUEST'S RECOMMENDS APPROVES PERSONNEL SERVICES 4010 SALARIES, REGULAR 37,603.23 41,084.22 42,647.00 50,580.00 44,100.00 4011 OVERTIME, REGULAR 1,061.52 1,151.94 1,085.00 1,145.00 1,123.00 4020 SALARIES,TEMP+PART TIME 1,656.00 7,528.75 4,000.00 .00 4,000.00 4030 PENSIONS 4,543.20 5,209.69 5,291.00 6,307.00 5,653.00 4040 GROUP INSURANCE 2,408.03 2,515.50 2,640.00 3,983.00 3,540.00 4050 WORKERS COMPENSATION 837.83 2,235.55 1,377.00 1,819.00 1,590.00 4060 UNEMPLOYMENT CC14P .00 360.63 .00 .00 .00 TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICES 48,109.81 60,086.28 57,040.00 63,834.00 60,006.00 MATERIALS + SUPPLIES 4121 SUPPLIES, BLOGS+GRNLS 20.38 153.55 145.00 145.00 148.00 4122 SUPPLIES, VEHICLE 20.52 67.17 905.00 947.00 141.00 4123 SUPPLIES, EQUIPMENT 2,225.25 2,341.82 4,788.00 3,908.00 3,896.00 4124 SUPPLIES, STREETS 836.70 130.48 725.00 766.00 765.00 4125 SUPPLIES, UTILITIES 5,609.42 1,366.83 3,457.00 3,457.00 3,457.00 4126 SUPPLIES,TRAFFIC CONTROL 903.04 .00 .00 90.00 320.00 4160 SUPPLIES, OPERATING 154.89 374.12 356.00 530.00 596.00 4170 MCJIOR FUELS + LUBRICANTS 4,014.22 4,714.83 4,048.00 6,965.00 5,794.00 4240 UNIFORMS + CLOTHING 386.45 717.08 534.00 598.00 534.00 TOTAL MATERIALS + SUPPLIES 14,170.87 9,865.88 14,958.00 17,406.00 15,651.00 ODNTRACTUAL SERVICES 4303 OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERV 656.66 40,209.20 .00 .00 .00 4310 COMMUNICATIONS -TELEPHONE 379.20 508.48 461.00 546.00 546.00 4321 ELECTRICITY 1,956.43 1,694.65 2,000.00 2,270.00 2,200.00 4354 DEBRIS REMOVAL .00 .00 180.00 180.00 180.00 4362 CONFERENCES .00 .00 .00 65.00 65.00 4363 TRAINING 135.00 150.00 165.00 165.00 165.00 4401 RENTAL, EQUIPMENT .00 136.60 .00 .00 .00 4510 LIUNTRACIUAL REPAIRS .00 .00 5,000.00 5,000.00 .00 4512 REP.,BLDGS + GROUNDS .00 210.00 .00 .00 .00 4513 REPAIRS, EQUIPMENT 221.23 20.60 152.00 152.00 152.00 4515 REPAIRS, UTILITIES 70,356.25 18,722.50 2,880.00 34,430.00 500.00 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 73,704.77 61,652.03 10,838.00 42,808.00 3,808.00 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW 730-121 SEWER UTILITY OPERATIONS ITEM DESCRIPTION 1981 ACTUAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 4703 EQUIPMENT 4795 DEPRECIATION EXPENSE TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY MISC. DISBURSEMENTS 4904 COLLECTIONS-0THER AOCYS 4910 CONTINGENCY TOTAL MISC. DISBURSEMENTS TOTAL OPERATIONS 0 1 DEPARTMENTAL BUDGET DETAIL - 1984 EXPENDITURES 1982 1983 1983 DEPARTMENT ADMINISTRATOR COUNCIL ALTUAL BUDGETED 6 MONTHS REQUESTS RECOMMENDS APPROVES .00 .00 3,000.00 105,575.00 105,575.00 19,600.00 105,575.00 105,575.00 22,600.00 1,245.92 1,696.40 .00 .00 .00 15,000.00 1,245.92 1,696.40 15,000.00 242,806.37 138,875.59�120,436.00 62,150.00 2,900.00 19,600.00 19,600.00 81:750.00 22,500.00 .00 .00 15,000.00 16,025.00 15,000.00 16,025.00 220,798.00 117,990.00 i S Ins sG Fce ii 'F.5 ' 111F; 51 I' SG*17 1 n(+,e- S tYt o ! I CO. So L he ot, F- -e 5 a 1 600 17Do 5Do! C. t' v. t + I coh,e i 710 1 3,D85' V �'r S 0.1t5 I 0 I ii C)' ''I 70; D7' 337 I 1 li I1 I _ eVewf i o! Id 1 !�FG-793 1 5C43 tcua I 19!'00 11 19!taa : II 9?bd I l.- C�.• , ,, 2 ---I i7 T iH QSaL 13&Sa C 11 D: oI II ISDODI I � ' 1 I�ll-tvl1v.tA oq. awv 11 o! pl iI 3318 I I J I I I I II ' I II I I - I II !I II I I II I I I I I I I d _ La « a7'a�q 115'u8� 577 3 it MEMO TO: FROM: 1)ATF,: SUI1J1'.CT: Att' IC Dynamic D addition the Plann on Septem regard to If you h meeting, KEICOMMEN may be n 1983 mee reports. /bc Attachme qtC4,LI s 0 TO: Clerk -Administrator and City Council FROM: Director of Public Works/Community Development DATE: September 2, 1983 JECT: DYNAMIC DI:SIONERS ached are additional materials for the proposed development by amic Designers. You have already received the site plan in ition to the two resolutions (Nos. 93-83 and 94-83) adopted by Planning Commission. This item Is scheduled for public hearing September 12, 1983. 1 will answer questions you may have with and to wetlands/flood plain, etc. at the agenda meeting. you have any questions concerning this development prior to the ting, please contact me. OMMENDATION: Please give staff direction as to materials that be needed to complete action on this item at the September 12, 3 meeting such as resolutions and/or ordinances or additional orts. achment CAS1:. 138-113 I'I'RI•lo werlandn Allrral-lnn Pvrmll' • DVvVLopmVnL Review l� Re.tnn Inl: Ninor Subdivislon Conditional Una PcrmiL APPLICANT: Dynamic Designer!; LOCATION: 7656 / 766U Wuudlawn Drive LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lou+ 3 and 4, Block 2 Park View Terrace SU1414AItY IL Itlti1I1R5'I' ApplLeanr requests Ln conscrnct an 8-unit condominium structure on the above man rloned Lots. The roqupst as presented would requite a wetlands alteration permit (which includes front and side yard setback variances), re•r.nning, minor subdivision (combining 2 lots Zito 1), conditional use permit (fIILing a portion of a wetland), and development review. PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS I. WRTLANO AND FLOOD PLAIN I RniNANCKS The proposed developmenL Iles within a designated wetland, the LOO foot wetland buffer area and flood plain area as -� regulated by Ordinance Nos. 48 and 49. -- A. WeLLand 'Zoning Ordinance Rev Iow (Chapter 48) 48.05 Merl and Zoning District Regulations. Subdivision 2. Thu 903 contour is the boundary of the wetland. Nu portion of the proposed building is planned within the 903 contour elevation. Subdivision 4. The combining of the two lots into one would be required since the proposed building extends over both existing lots. An casement is required. to the 903 contour for protection of the wetland. Subdivision 5. Subparagraphs A and B can only be met if the two lots are combined into one. Subparagraph C states all structures shall be setback at least 100 feet from the wetland. This would render the property unbutldable without the granting of a variance. 48.06 Permits. Subdivision 2. No filling is proposed for the wetland. Pilling of the buffer area and flood plain area is being proposed. CASH '1311-113 raga Two Sub,livislnn 3. \. h:lll_Inl; hIn I11111 ; Is piupn:;e,l I'nr Lhe wetland. U. I1raJtilult - Nu dredging Is being proposed. C, 1)1sc113r_P.e:; - I'nrny,rnpIts 'I, 4, 5 and 6 apply to ibis prupn;;;,l and :;I nIJ he cited In Ibe permit if one l5 prnpu::cl. p, titur_m Nuier Iiunoif - rer Lhe :;Ite plan dated 7/1'2/83, the applicant prnposus to (IisclLargu storm water from tic itc directly into the we[Land, Plan will need Cn be 1, 1!;ed showing JIreCLln❑ of storm water LI, hen structure/ski,n,nt,r r a r storm water discharing into Lhe wetland• Subparagraphs 1, 2, 3, A and 5 will hued to be followed. I:. IIu_iIII fn,..Cuu`;LraalnLs - I`Irst f1n'LrLIiuL9US11cnaCour. e i.•val lung ani::t be, mini,a;il ly, Thu applicant has stated that the buildings will be at 9U5. 'fills shouid be shown un Lite pLail • F. ViceC�lion - Applicant will be removing vegetation from Chu buffer :n•e;t, Placement of the g ar harkinea and hot IIdIng:; ner.essIt.1re removal of veg. Subdivi:;lon 4. A(I) A wetland alterat(on purmlt is °�cThisLS Sit rsectionto a lallows res.idenLinI. use on the property• tllu city to 1 mit size, kind and character of this proposol to insure compliance. This section ssof allows modification of dimensional requirements the the •7..oning ordinance to further purposes wetlands chapter (i.e., reduction in setbacks). ,The front yard setback• applicant is proposing a 23 foot This would fail under Lhe dimensional modifications nLlowcd by this section. A(2) Upon npPrnvnl, the City needs to establish a surety amount to guarantee conformance with the Code. U. Subparagraphs I, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 have been submitted. Additional items which may need to be submitted include; l) Tile developer's engineer has submitted a letter stating that the sells are of the sandy loam variety. No formal soil serve has been submi[[e There appears to be no unsuitable soils within th proposed building area. L�: Care 138-07 Page Three (� 2) Design npecificallon and plan fnr all sediment and erusiun measurer. 5ubdfvision 5. Should he slntad in the permit, 48.08 Subdivision I, A. Park fund dedication may not apply to lot combinations, ph Ii, Applicant is proposing to shift Chu density from Chu wetland area to the buffer area. if full denslcy transfer is used for combined lots than u Lto 22.1 units could be constructed provided that parking and open space requirements are met, 48,14 A variance to the front yard (6' variance) and i side yard (6' variance) is required which is allowed under previous sections of this ordinance. 8. Flood Plain Zoning Ordinance Review (Chapter 49) 4 9. 02 Subdivision 9(e). Sets minimum floor elevation at 905. Applicant proposes building at 905 contour, meeting Code requirements. 49.04 Subdivision 1(d). Portions of the dwelling building, parking area and lawn area are proposed within the flood plain areas provided no additional fill is required. Additional fill is required within the flood plain area to accommodate the building and parking area. Subdivision 2. The placement of fill within a flood at: .i,� zoning districc requires a conditional use permit. ;,' Subdivision l(a). This section prohibits the granting of a conditional use permit when the proposal/fill will increase the flood height. The applicant's proposal anticipates the filling of less than 17 cubic yards of flood plain (which is approximately .0104 AC/FT), under i the building itself. An additional 1.5 cubic yards• of fill is needed to accommodate the the north parking area. This combined amount of fill will not significantly increase the flood height and any increase in flood height, will be undetectable. Subdivision 7(b). question to be answered is whether the proposed fill is the minimum necessary to accommodate the - buildings. 49.05 Subdivisions. Since the property needs to be combined because of the buildings$ this section would apply. 1 Cane 138-83 Page pour 49.07 Subdivision 4. Provides for Planning Commmission 10 review and reeommendation to the City Council, City Council will then hold a public hearing. Subdivision 4(a). A copy nr the conditional use permit application must be sent to the Commissioner of Che Department of Natural Resources at least Can days prior to the hearing. Subdivision 4(e), List 12 factors to he considered in acting on a conditional use permit. Items I, 4, 7, 9, 10, and II appear to have n direct application to this proposed development. The other items appear to have little or no application. Subdivision 4(g). Allows placing of conditions deemed necessary to meet the purpose of Chapter 49. 2, PARKING The applicant is proposing one tuck -under garage per unit and 12 Coral uncovered parking spaces. The uncovered spaces, per Code, should be striped. The number of garages and free spaces meet Code requirements. The 'Zoning Code does not presently state curb cut requirements for R-4 districts. l j 7. 20NIN0 This building would be considered a condominimum (townhouses limit the units to b). Applicant has stated they will be owner occupied. The site is presently zoned R-7. The proposed use requires'an R-4 rezoning. ,; MEMO TO: Planning Commission FROM: Director of Public Works/Community Development DATH,: August 17, 1983 SUBJECT: DYNAMIC DESIGNERS 8-PLEX DRAINAGE PLAN I have reviewed the drainage plan dated August 15, 1983 (see attached letter and plan) submitted by Hedlund Engineering Services, Inc. The plan proposes to discharge all impervious areas to the parking lot and to store 3,950 cubic feet of runoff in parking lot and 420 cubic feet in an underground storage tank. The parking lot and tan: outlet will control the rate of discharge and provide an nil and debris skimmer. This proposal will meet the requirements of 49A. The wetlands permit and development agreement should state that all maintenance of drainge structures shall be the responsibility of the property owner. The plan also should show route of emergency overflow in the event of blockage of pipe or winter freeze up. The flood plain conditional use permit should note proposed base- ment elevation of 903.8 which is below the required 905 regional flood elevation. Therefore, foundation shall be flood proofed per State Building Code requirements. JCJ/bc Attachment A PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA Regular Meeting UAugust 22, 1983 Mounds View City Hall 2401 Hwy 10, Mounds View, MN 55112 --- --------------------------------------------------- ----------------- The Mounds View City Council was called to order by 1. Call to Order Acting Mayor Blanchard at 7:30 PM on August 22, 1983. MEMBERS PRESENT: Councilmembers Doty, Linke and 2. Roll Call an ner an cting Mayor Blanchard. It was noted that Mayor McCarty was absent on vacation. ALSO PRESENT: City Attorney Meyers, Clerk/Admini- strator Pauley and Public Works/Community Development Director Johnson. Motion/Second: Doty/Linke to approve the August 3. Approval of 8, T993 minutes as corrected. Minutes: 4 ayes 0 nays August 8, 1983 Motion Carried There were no residents requests or comments from 4. Residents Re - the floor, quests and Comments from the Floor Motion/Second: Linke/Hankner to approve the 5. Approval of consent agenda, as presented, and waive the Consent Agenda reading of the resolutions. 4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Motion/Second: Linke/Doty to approve the first 6. 1st Reading of rea 1ng o rdinance No. 333, amending the municipal Ordinance No. code of Mounds View by amending Chapter 32, entitled 333 "The Planning Commission", and waive the reading of the ordinance. 4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Mounds View CityCouncil ,1' �_ Meeting ~ d G',;,y 1� I��� August 22, I983 Regular Meeting + Page Two --------------•-------------------------------------------------------- Motion/Second: DotVl,inke to have the first reading 1. 1st Readi of ordinance No. 33, amending the municipal code Ordinanc �. of bounds View by amending Chapter 43 entitled 334 "Mobile Homes", and waive the reading of the ordinance. 4 ayes ' 0 nays Motion Carried Clerk/Administrator Pauley reviewed Park Director 8. Consideration Anderson's memo of August 18 regarding the hiring Memo from Dire of the part-time aquatics director. He explained for of Parks, the position would be funded from three separate Recreation and sources, $3,500 from the Lakeside Park Commission Forestry Regar account, $1,500 from the City of Mounds View's ing Hiring of recreation account, and $4,000 from the recreation Part -Time Aqua activity program fees from account 250-351-4304. tics Coordinate Motion/Second: Doty/Hankner to approve the hiring of Maureen Thielen for the part-time aquatics director, and pass Resolution No. 1644 and the memo of understanding between the City of Mounds View and Ms. Thielen, outlining the duties of the City's part-time aquatics director. The length of employment is to be one year, to terminate on August 22, 1984, with the salary not to exceed $9,000. 4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Acting Mayor Blanchard closed the regular meeting 9. Public Hearing and opened the public hearing at 7:42 PM. Rezoning of 7801 Sunnyside Director Johnson noted that Mr. Bayerkohler was Road from R-3 present. He explained the applicant is proposing to B-2 to take the existing 4-plex building and convert it into office -type space, and that in order to make the conversion, certain site revisions must be made. He stated the Planning Commission has reviewed the item and discussed it with Mr. Bayerkohler and have recommended approval to the Council. He added that Staff recommends the Council move ahead with Resolution No. 1643 and the first reading of Ordinance No. 346. Clerk/Administrator Pauley pointed out the section of the code that Councilmember Linke found which called for screening of the building. Jim Plocienik, a representative for Mr. Bayerkohler, stated they would be agreeable to put in screening, and he presented the Council with site plans, showing the layout of the existing and proposed screening. He noted that much of the screening is already in place. Acting Mayor Blanchard closed the public hearing and Mounds View City Council ,� August 22, 1983 Regular Meeting Page Three ---------------------------------- ------------------------------- !1 reopened the regular meeting at 7:50 PM. Councilmember Doty noted that the rezoning is contin- gent upon the successful purchase of the property. Attorney Meyers advised that they must make sure there is a valid sale of the property before approving the resolution, and recommended that an addition be made to the resolution, stating "Be it further resolved that this proposal shall be contingent upon approval of the Rice Creek Watershed District and the title transfer." Councilmember Doty stated the ordinance should not be presented to the Council for the second reading until proof of ownership has been presented to the City. Motion/Second: Doty/Linke to approve Resolution No1b 3�corrected, approving the rezoning of 7801 Sunnyside Road from R-3 to B-2, and waive the reading of the resolution. 4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Motion/Second: Doty/Hankner to have the first 10. 1st Reading of rea ing o Ordinance No. 346, amending the Ordinance No. municipal code of Mounds View by amending 346 Chapter 41 entitled "Specific Rezonings", and waive the reading of the ordinance and Staff was instructed not to present the Ordinance for a second reading until proof of title transfer has been received, and approval received from the Rice Creek Watershed District. 4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Clerk/Administrator Paulay reviewed Park Director 11. Consideration Anderson's memo of August 18 regarding the review Memo from Park of bid proposals for the 1984 one -ton dump truck. Rec and Forest He stated that Staff would recommend the purchase Director Regar of the truck, with the addition of the LaHass Box, ing One -Ton winch, heavy duty snow plow, and conversion to Dump Truck Bid propane. Motion/Second: Hankner/Linke to approve the purchase o t e GMC Truck Model No. TC31403, in the amount of $11,087.45, from GMC Truck Center of Minneapolis, with an additional $234 for a LaHass Box, an L&Z Company winch for $695, and heavy duty snow plow for $1,285, and conversion of the vehicle to propane. This will include a two-way radio and strobe light, 4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Mounds ViwCity Council- U N --r 1 !. r. August 22, 1383 P Pkk tt Page Four --C--------- Meeting E b?�i �`- g------------ ------- ------ ---- Clerk/Administrator Pauley presented the Council 12, Cons iderar`nn with copies of correspondence received from the of Staff City rf Fridley regarding cable tv legislation, Regarding and recommended Mounds View adopt the same type Federal Cable of resolution. TV Legislation Motion/Second: Doty/Linkc to adopt Resolution No. opposing Senate File 66 and urging defeat of any companion proposal in the House of Representatives, and waive the reading. 4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Clerk/Administrator Pauley noted that the City of 13. Consideration Mounds View has already adopted several resolu- of Staff Memo tions on this issue. He stated he would be Regarding present to represent the City at the meeting of Fridley Hazar- the Waste Management Board, and will make a dous Waste Site statement if given the opportunity. He added he will have certified copies of the City's previous resolutions to hand out. Director Johnson reported he had appeared before 14. Report on Mee the Unencumbered Construction Funds Subcommittee ing Regan ^g on August 17 to explain why Mounds View had not MSA Unenc spent it's MSA construction money. He explained Constructl...i that if the City does not use any of the money, Funds the 1984 MSA account will be reduced approximately $25,000, and if nothing is done in 1985, the fund will be reduced at least $50,000. He explained that in order to prevent any reduction, a project of at least $60,000 needs to be awarded in 1983, which could be achieved by resurfacing some of the streets in the City. Director Johnson stated he has inspected the streets in question and determined that they are resurfacable, but that the engineer from the central office does not agree, and feels the streets should be torn up and rebuilt. Director Johnson asked for authoriza- tion from the Council to obtain an expert opinion, with the cost to be approximately $2,000, to be funded from the revenue sharing account for street maintenance study. He added he hopes to have a proposal ready for the Council by their September 9 meeting. Motion/Second; Linke/Hankner to authorize the rector o ublic Works/Community Development the use of $2,000, with the approval of the Clerk/Administrator, to obtain an outside consultant's opinion on the viability of an MSA project for 1983, with the money to be repaid from MSA if the project is approved. 4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried d ^? Mounds View City Council August 22, 1983 Regular Meeting % '' • ----------------------------------------------------------------------- i Page Five "`` Director Johnson reviewed his memo of August 22 15. Consideration to the Council, concerning the 1983 sealcoat and of Staff Memo street repairs. Ile presented an overhead map Regarding 1983 of the City, showing the streets scheduled for Sealcoat Pro - repair, and options available, ject and Autho rization to Motion/Second: Doty/Hankner to authorize the Advertise for Director of Public: {Yorks/Community Development Lo Bids let the bids for the seal coat program, with the opening to be September 8, and including Longview Road between Woodcrest and County Road H, and Red Oak Drive between County Road H2 and County Road 11, as alternative possibilities for seal coating. Funds are identified in the budget for 1983. Also, Staff is authorized to complete by force account with department personnel or by negotiated prices with contractors the minor street re airs within the project area up to a maximum of U5,000. 4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Director Johnson reviewed his memo of August 22 16. Consideration to the Council concerning a consultant for review of Staff Memo of the Miller Industrial Park wetland data. Regarding Hiri- a Consultant ti Acting Mayor Blanchard stated she felt a third Review Wetland party was necessary to protect the integrity of Issued Raised the wetland ordinance. Per Miller Industrial Par! Motion/Second: Doty/Linke to allow Staff to Proposal proceed with a working agreement with Braun Engineering Testing, and develop a working contract to have them study and review the existing field data, supplement field data as necessary, analyze existing soil and vegatative materials as they relate to the wetland areas, analyze ground water hydrologic conditions, establish or assess near and long term impacts on site wetland charac- teristics due to variances in hydrologic cycles and existing man-made features, and recoimuend to the City what, if any, changes can or should be considered to the area regulated by the wetland ordinance, in conjunction with the Miller Industrial Park, with the cost not to exceed $5,000, with the funds to come from the SWM fund. 3 ayes 1 nay Motion Carried Councilmember Hankner stated she had voted against the motion as she felt that spending the money for a consulting engineering firm may not be the best use of the money when there are State professionals available to the City to use, Mounds View City Council J:rn�• August 22, 1983 Regular Plecting � �9 - �_ f y -----Page-Six -------------------------------------- ---------- There was discussion among the Council as to the intent of the SWM fund, and Councilmember Linke pointed out that the money in the SWM funds was from developers such as Mr. Miller, and not the general taxpayer. It was felt that the hiring of a consultant would be a justifiable use of the funds, considering the time constraints that are involved, Director Johnson reviewed his memo of August 18 to 17 the Council, concerning the Programmed Land final plat. He stated that Staff has reviewed the final plat and finds everything in order. The representative from Programmed Land stated that if the final plat is approved, they hope to start construction yet this fall. Clerk/Administrator Pauley added that as the Council has done in the past, they will probably grant a grading permit, and then the building permit later, to allow the developer to begin work. Motion/Second: Linke/Doty to adopt Resolution No. 1625, approving the final plat of Programmed Land, Inc., and waive the reading of the resolution. 4 ayes 0 nays Motion/Second: Hankner/Linke to adop'. Kesolution No. 1626, executing Development Agreement No. 83-61 for Programmed Land, Inc., and waive the reading of the resolution. 4 ayes 0 nays Clerk/Administrator Pauley explained that Tammy Turnacliff, the present receptionist, graduated this pact Jime, and s1,nee the City does not wich to make her position permanent, it is felt that it would be in her best interests, and that of the City's, to terminate her employment with the City and hire another high school student part-time. Motion/Second: Hankner/Doty to authorize Staff to notify Tammy Turnacliff of the decision to terminate her employment on September 9, 1983 due to the stated intent of the position to provide training under the Office Education Program, and authorize the hiring of Michelle Bednorz as the part-time receptionist at $3.50 per hour starting on September 12, 1983. Consideration of Staff Memo Regarding Pro- grammed Land Final Plat Motion Car.. d Motion Carried 18. Consideration of Staff Recom- mendation R.P.par ing Receptionis Position 11 4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Mounds View City Council. August 22, 1983 Regular Fleeting Page Seven --------------------------- - �`---------- -----------_------------------ Director Johnson reported that the new treatment 19. Report of equipment in Wells #5 and #6 was put into opera- Director of tion on August 19 and seems to be working well. Public Works/ Community Dvlp Attorney Meyers reported the Legislature's revised fine schedule went into effect August 1, which is part of the overall trend of tightening up. Councilmember Doty stated that due to the problems the Mary Anderson development is running into with the new requirement for sprinklers in their condominiums, such as the services in the street not being adequate, and the buildings not being designed with sprinklers in mind, the City should take into consideration excluding this type of structure from the ordinance. He pointed out that the type of construction Mary Anderson is doing is much better than what is normally used. He asked Attorney Meyers to do some investigating into changing the ordinance and making some type of adjustment. Attorney Meyers replied that he was already directed by Staff to research the question, and he has met with Mary Anderson. He added that he has asked for an interpretation from the State Building Official office. He pointed out the code refers specifically to apartments, hotels and motels. 11e stated he will continue to research the problem, and that it may require a repeal of the code. Councilmember Doty reported the Park and Rec Commission meeting has been postponed to September 1. Councilmember Linke reported he had attended the Ramsey County League of Local Governments meeting on August 17, regarding the Metro Waste Control Commission, and reviewed the information he had received at the meeting. He added that a rep from the Met Council would like to meet with the City Council at a dinner meeting at 6 PM on Septem- ber 2. Councilmember Linke reported he had received a packet of information from the MWCC, which he would have available for anyone to look at or copy. 20. Report of Attorney 21. Reports of Councilmembers I p nn,..n�, 17 August. 22, 1983 Mounds View City Counuilil'?.c•r�• ;•G �Y,� i Regular Meeting �r,. �� a <,.v , i i Page Eight ------------------ -------------- ---- ----------------------------------- Councilmember Hankner reported she had received some calls from residents on the north side of the City, concerned with access to Silver View Park, and spe- cifically concerned with crossing Highway 10. Clerk/Administrator Pauley replied that if side- walks were installed along County Road I, there would be a good opportunity to have "walk" and "don't walk" signals installed at the intersection of Highway 10 and County Road I. He added that another option would be an overhead crosswalk. Director Johnson advised that an overhead crosswalk would be extremely costly, and other cities had found that the children still do not use them, but rather cut across the highway, even climbing fences to do so, Councilmember Hankner reported she will be attending the goal setting seminar on August 31 and September 1, and that on September 8 she will be attending a Community Development Block Grant Workshop, and that on September 29 she will be attending the League of Minnesota Cities regional meeting. Acting Mayor Blanchard reported that there had been considerable discussion at the Planning Cormnission meeting regarding when a conditional use permit is granted for a building in the flood plain and wetland, as to what type of maintenance is to be done. Director Johnson replied that there are proposals in the review process now for which the code does not address routine maintenance. Attorney Meyers advised that the restrictions be set out in the development agreement. Acting Mayor Blanchard reported the Planning Commission had authorized Staff to send a letter to Northeast Marine regarding their used car sales, and that Staf f will be checking up on others who are selling cars in the City, such as at Highway 10 and Groveland Road, and Red Oak Drive and Highway 10, on the vacant lot, and they should notify them that it is not allowed. Clerk/Administrator Pauley advised that the first 22. Report of meeting with Fire Chief Fagerstrom will be at Administra`,r 2 PM on August 23, and that the Staff's of the three cities seem to be united, and he urged the Councilmembers to lobby the other Councils for their support. ` r _ .. Mounds View City Councili Regular Meeting-----L: ------------------- ------- August 22, 1983 Page Wine ------------------------------ Clerk/Administrator Pauley reminded the Council of their meeting with Mary Hauser at G PM on August 24. He also reminded them of the goal setting seminar on August 31 and September 1. Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported he will be attending the Waste Management Board meetings this week. Motion/Second: Iiankner/Linke to adjourn the meeting 23 at 9:44 PM. 4 ayes 0 nays Respectfully submitted, Donald F. Pauley Clerk/Administrator Adjournment Motion Carried