Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packets - 1983/11/14CITY OF MODNUS VIEN Nnvembur 14, 19111 r WORKSE'SSION 6:30 p.m. 1, Minnesota '1,nx Commission Public Hearing CITY COUNCIL. MEETING 7:30 p.m. A G E N D A 1. fall to Order 2. Roll Call - Rlanchard, Doty, Linke, Ilankner., McCarty 3. Approval of Minutes: October 24, 1983 (Regular Meeting) 4, Residents Requests and Comments from the Floor. ------------------------------------------------ CI'l' nNS: 11EFORE SPEAKING PLEASE GIVE YOUR FULI, NAME AND ADDRESS FOR TILE MINUTES ------------------------------------------------ 5. Approval of Consent Agenda ITEM A. Approve Resolution No. 1676 Amending Development Agreement No. 82-52 with M 6 E Realty ITEM B. Approve Resolution No. 1677 Approval of the Comple- tion of Development Agreement No. 78-35 with Mounds View Development Company, Inc. ITEM C. Approve Resolution No. 1678 Authorizing Contribu- tions to the North Suburban Cable Communications Commission ITEM U. AppluVB Ri:S0111tiGn Irv. 109 uuu.,r.,iRg the Reappoint- ment of Lloyd H. Scott, Sr. to the Rice Creek Water- shed District Board of Managers ITEM E. Approve Resolution No. 1682 Authorizing Interim Wetland Alteration Permit for Roger Morgan at 7395 Knol.lwood Drive i ITEM F. Authorize Staff to Proceed with Resolution of Long Lake Road Ditch Project Pursuant to Recommendations Contained in Staff Memorandum Dated November 3, 1983 ITEM G. Approve the Retention of Springsted, Inc. to Conduct a Cash Defeasance of the City's Improvement Bond Redemption Fund Per the Proposal Dated October 17, 1903 -continued- AGENDA Navomb('r lA, 19113 Paye Two 10 5. Approval of Consent Agenda (,',)nt.) ITEM II. Aulhorixo tha Hiring nl Six 1983-84 MEKD Prnyram Positions Pursuant to Recommendations Contained in Staff Memorandum Dated November. 3, 1983 ITEM I. Approve Final Acreptanca and Payment for 1983 Seal Coat Project in tho Amount. of. $34,031.06 to Allied Blacktop Company ITEM J. Approve Final Acceptance and Payment for 1983 Water Treatment Plants 2 and 3 Modifications in the Amount of $14,828.00 to A & K Construction Company ITEM K. Licenses for Approval ITEM L. Approve Resolution No. 1681 Approving Just and Correct Claims Against City Funds 6. Approval of Resolution No. 1680 Commending the Irondale Knights Girls Soccer Team as State Girls Soccer Champions 7. Consideration of Police Chief Candidates Certified by the Civil Service Commission 8. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding Advertising for the Director of Public Works/Community Development Position (Material will be handed out Monday.) 9. First Reading of ordinance No. 350 Amending Chapter 48 of the Mounds View Municipal Code Entitled, "Wetland Zoning Ordinance" 10. First Reading of Ordinance No. 351 Amending Chapter 48 of the Mounds View Municipal Code Entitled, "Wetland Zoning Ordinance" 11. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding 1984 City News- letter Bid Proposals 12. Report of Director of Public Works/Community Development 1.3. Report of Attorney 14. Report of Councilmembers - Blanchard, Doty, Linke, Hankner, Mayor McCarty 15. Report of Administrator 16. Adjournment J Ua��;W Y Y LJ PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY 01, MOUNLs VIEW RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA 2,101 11wy. 10, The Mounds View City Council was called to order by Mayor McCarty at 7:30 PM on October 24, 1983. MEMBERS PRESENT: Councilmembers Hankner, Blanchard, Doty, Linke, and Mayor McCarty ALSO PRESENT: City Attorney Meyers, Clerk/ Administrator Pauley and Public Works/Community Development Director Johnson, Potion/Second: Linke/Blanchard to approve the October 10, 1983 minutes as corrected. 5 ayes 0 nays Mayor McCarty closed the regular meeting and opened the public hearing at 7:41 PM. There was no one present with questions for the Council. Mr. John Miller stated he would like to make sure everything that has been submitted to the City would become a part of the record. He stated they submitted a preliminary plat in 1980 and that the moratorium ordinance went into effect in 1981, after the Council had acted on the preliminary _plat. This has stalled the project. Mr. Miller stated that the purpose of the public hearing tonight was for the Council to consider amending the wetlands map, and he pointed out that he had met with the Council on October 21, 1982 and told them the wetlands map was in error, and he has continued to tell them that. Mr. Miller asked that the Council be sure to take into consideration his letter of October 20, 1983, stating that he had reviewed the Braun Engineering J Regular Meeting October 24, 1983 Mounds View City Hall Mounds Vic-, MN 55112 --------------------- 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Approval of Minutes: October 10, 1983 Motion Carried 4. Public Hearing - Amendment to Chapter 48, Wetland Zoning Ordinance Mounds View City Council p" " Nor Regular Meeting --_____ i October 24, 1983 . Page Two report with his consultants Darr -------------------------------- Page were in substantial agreement Ewithcerin and -_---- asked that the Braun Engineering report be accepted theirby the City so he could proceed with Phase I ce their developmenL,of Bruce hlalkerson, attorney for the Millers, asked that by reference, everything that had been pre- sented to the City to date regarding the Miller property be incorporated into the record, including all exhibits, correspondence, maps and so forth. Director Johnson asked the Council to consider also entering .into the records the letters received from Tom Peterson of the Minnesota Soil and Water Conservation District, dated October 19, 1983,and the one from Dr. Russell Adams, from the Ramsey Soil and Water Conservation District, dated October 20, 1983. Attorney Meyers advised that the issue to be dec kled during this hearing was to consider a redelineation of wetlands on the Miller property. Director Johnson made a presentation, using a map Of the area, showing the different wetland boundaries established by the Wetland Ordinance and Darr and Braun reports for the area. Mr. Malkerson asked that the future referenceked for . The map be Council labeled rthe map Public Hearing Exhibit 1, dated October 29, 19831 which is a compilation, subject to refinement, of the boundary delineations from discussi the public hearing. ons in Mr. Jim Miller presented the Council wir_r, flch r�nr auclio,i of construction County Highway Department Plans from the area around 85th ' which shows the actual the culvert that Avenue North, and the location of placed on the property. D"e=tar Johnson clbarified the vert, stating that it had purpose of the cul- and they had not been ableto installed flat, in the field to locate the culvert notin ' to see what condition it was in, g that it was installed over 50 years ago. Mr. Miller's map was labeled Public Hearing Exhibit 2, with the notation that the culvert had not been proven to be there. Mr. Miller explained they have du they believe the culvert to be in g in the area e ey have found evidence of material that wohlocated En the entrance to a ulddbeculvert. 110 added that Barr Engineering had made notaLioils of I , elevations Mounds View City Council i October 24, 1983 Regular Meeting t'. Page Thxee ------------------------------------------------------------------------ of the area and their property is considerably higher than the ditch on 85th Avenue. He stated if there was a culvert there, the water would drain off. John Miller noted that Mr. Kramer of Barr Engineering had stated before that water would drain off the property. Jim Miller stated that reference had been made to that• fact in the wetlands alteration permit application. Mayor McCarty expressed concern with having the schematics entered into the minutes, as there were too many ambiguities. Councilmember Hankner noted that page 4 of the Barr report addresses the issue of the culvert and drainage. Mayor McCarty closed the public hearing and reopened the regular meeting at 8:04 PM. Councilmember Linke stated he would prefer to deal with 1-22 separately, as the Braun Engineering report states it does not function as a wetland. Motion/Second: Linke/Hankner to direct Staff to prepare an ordinance, to eliminate in its entirety, the wetland now designated and shown as 1-22. 4 ayes 1 nay Motion Carried Councilmember Doty voted against the motion, stating he did not believe the evidence warranted the motion at this time. Councilmember Linke stated his reasons for the motion were that conditions have changed according to what the City initially thought when the ordinance was drafted, and there was an error when the report was prepared. There was considerable discussion among the Council as to what documentation there is to support the belief there were errors. Councilmember Linke pointed out the two consulting firms have not put in writing that errors were made, but they have verbally stated it. Mayor McCarty noted the report refers to run-off for the development and has nothing to do with 1-22. Attorney Meyers reminded the Council a 4/5 vote is required, and they must have a rational basis Mounds View City Council October 24, 1983 Regular Meeting Page Pour ------------------------------------------------------------------------ for implementing a change in the ordinance. Neil Loeding questioned the addendum to the Barr report, regarding the wetland data sheeL. Mr. Malkcrson referred to Chapter 48.01, Subd. 3 a, reviewing the requirements, and stated it is the Miller's position that the area identified as 1-22 is so small in size and unrelated to the other areas that it never should have been identified as an existing, functional wetland. lie added that while the Council may have written reports which may or may not say something, the Courts have said City Councils are responsible to listen to all parties, and make their conclusions by what facts are deemed relevant. He stated that if the Council believes the wetland does not function in the way it should be in order to be protected, they should make their decision and vote accordingly, interpreting the facts and applying them to the question before them. Mayor McCarty stated he was not sure anyone could address the adverse precedence of removing a wetland, as it relates to other similar situations in the City. Councilmember Ilankner pointed out the question was put to the experts at Barr and Braun, and there is a question if the area is functioning as a wetland. Mr. Malkerson stated he believes it is important procedurally for the Council to vote on an ordinance that has all the language in it, and that Staff should be directed to prepare it so that everyone knows what they are voting on. He also agreed that the authorization to prepare this ordinance is not a final vote but only the preparation of an ordinance to be considered by the Council. Motion/Second: McCarty/Linke to amend the main motion to 'Include, concurrence with drafting of the ordinance, written reports from the engineers and professionals involved in the preparation of the Barr and Braun reports, specifically Dr. Russell Adams, to convey to the Council in writing, the actual facts regarding the function of wetland 1-22. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion/Second: Hankner/Blanchard to direct staff to draft an amendment to the ordinance to redefine the wetland boundaries of 1-23 according to the Braun report. 11 /® Motion Carried E 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Mounds View City Council October 24, 1983 Regular Meeting Page Five ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Councilmember 11ankner explained her reasons for the motion, both the errors and the change in conditions, and at the time the ordinance was adopted, it was understood that the invontufy that was adopted of the wetland map covered a certain amount of the area, and because the City has done some on -site data collection, they have discovered it is not what it was thought to be. She also pointed out errors with the Barr and Braun reports. Mayor McCarty stated there must be an understanding that the Phase II proposal, goes further into the wetlands still than what the ordinance contemplates. and they must: not maximize exploitation of the property. Mr. Malkerson pointed out the Miller's have spent a great deal of time and money for engineers and draftsmen to prepare all the plans that have been requested to date, and they need a more definite direction from the Council, and they need the issue voted on, so they can proceed to come up with a redefinition so they can take the next step. Mayor McCarty asked if the Miller's would be willing to withdraw their request for a subdivision for Phase I and Phase II, until clarifications of the delineations of the wetland. John Miller stated they are not requesting Phase II. Motion/Second: McCarty/Doty to amend the main motion, t at t e re elineation of the wetland not be construed as approval of the proposal for Phase I or Phase II for the subdivisions. 5 ayes 0 nays Acting Police Chief Smith reported 512 citations had hpon issued in the third quarter for traffic offenses, with 81 adults arrested for crimes other than traffic violations. He reported everything is going very well with the outdoor volleyball at the Loose Ends nightclub, and that everything went well with the Mermaid grand re -opening. Acting Chief Smith reported they had had their annual qualification for firearms, and one officer has completed the course on firearms instruction. There were no residents requests or comments from the floor. Motion Carried 5. 3rd Quarter 198 Department Head °n ^rr _ dnr{no Police Chief y Smith 6. Residents Re- yuests and Comments from the Floor Mounds View City Council Regular Meeting Motion/Second: Blanchard/Ilankner to approve the consenL agc�a, as presented, and waive the reading of the resolutions. S ayes D nays Mayor McCarty requested the council's concurrence with the proposed appointment of Kathy Pomerleau to the festivities Commission. Motion/Second: Doty/Linke to appoint Kathy Pomerleau to the Festivities Commission, in concurrence with Mayor McCarty's request. 5 aves D nays Motion/Second: Linke/Hankner to deny the Director of Public Works/Community Development position to be held by an outside consultant. However, the Council can make other arrangements with the person in that position for how the benefit package would be handled in the way of pay -outs, but that the person in that position be under all current policies in regard to the other department heads within the City staff. 3 ayes 2 nays Mayor McCarty and Councilmember Doty voted against the motion. Mayor McCarty reviewed the discussion at the 7 PM special meeting, held earlier in the evening, to discuss Mr. Johnson's request to continue as a consultant, rather than a full time employee, and the areas the Council was in agreement with. Director Johnson stated the key issue is that there be an employment contract that allows him to do certain things with the IRS that he would not be able to do as a full time employee. Attorney Meyers advised that the position could not be both, that it is either a full time position or a consulting position, and that if it is a Consultant positions, the terms and conditions should be set out in an agreement. Clerk/Administrator Pauley advised that under IRS regulations, Director Johnson could stipulate on his W-4 that he wanted no deductions withheld. He also advised that if Director Johnson was to become a full time employee, he would be required by law to have PERA, Social Security, werkers-eemp-and upempleyment-eemp and State Income t •ces withheld. October 24, 1983 Page Six --------------------- 7. Approval ob Consent Ac Motion Carried 8. Consideration of Application from Kathy Pomerleau for Appointment to Festivities Commission Motion Carried 9. Consideration of Employment Arrangements for Director of Public Works/ Community Dvlo. 0 Motion Carried • Mounds View City Council October 24, 1983 Regular Meeting - Page Seyen ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Motion/Second: McCarty/Doty to amend the main motion Eo continue John Johnson's consultant status for the first quarter of 1984, and reconsider the main motion at that time. 2 ayes 3 nays Motion Failed Councilmembers Linke, Blanchard and Hankner voted against the motion, stating they believed it was important to have someone in that position as a full time employee beginning at the first of the year, and that it is necessary to have someone at City Hall full time, and that they could foresee problems arising with the other department heads over privleges granted to someone on a consultant basis, and that they need consistency in management for moraloreasons, and effective operation of the department. Mayor McCarty stated he felt it was important for Mr. Johnson to continue at least through the first quarter of 1984, due to the many programs that have been started that he did not want left without supervision. Councilmember Linke pointed out that at any given time, there are new projects starting up, and unfinished projects to be completed, and the end of the first quarter of 1984 would not be that different than any other time during the year. Councilmember Doty stated that Mr. Johnson has brought many skills to the City, which have benefited the City. He stated he was aware they have had problems with him in the manager/ department head role, but he did not feel they were that bad. He added that he is not opposed to the position being a full time department head position. Motion/Second: McCarty/Blanchard to approve the 10. 2nd Reading and seconZ reacT3ng and adoption of Ordinance No. 349, Adoption of as amended, and waive the reading. Ordinance No. 349 Councilmember Hankner - aye Councilmember Blanchard - aye Councilmember Doty - aye Councilmember Linke - aye Mayor McCarty - aye Motion Carried Director Johnson reviewed his memo of October 11. Consideration 20, to the Council, regarding his recommendation of Staff Recom- for the storm sewer construction on St. Stephen mendation for Street. Contracting of St. Stephen St. Drainage Corr. Mounds View City Hall October 24, 1983. Regular Meeting Page Right ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Motion/Second: Doty/Blanchard to authorize Staff to , execute a purchase order to Ray Perron for the pro- posed storm sewer improvement work or. St. Stephen Street in the amount of $2,249.75, plus up to $480.00 at $60.00 per hour for dewatering work, if necessary, and also to authorize Staff to execute a purchase order for necessary materials for the project, esti- mated at $2,008.25, with the funding to come from the 514M fund. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Director Johnson reported the inspection of Tower 12. Report of No. 2 had started. Ile also reported there had been Director of a water main break on Sunday, as well as another one Public Works/ earlier in the evening, at Adams and County Road I. Community Dvlp. Director Johnson reminded the Council he will be in Brainerd on October 26 to meet with the MSA screening committee. Attorney Meyers turned a check for $1,000 over to 13. Report of Clerk/Administrator Pauley, explaining it was the Attorney final payment relative to the City Hall lawsuit, • which will complete the file. He added that the total amount recovered was $24,000. Councilmember Hankner had no report. 14. Reports of Councilmembers Councilmember Blanchard reported the Planning Commission has finalized their revisions of the zoning code, and will have a special meeting on October 26 to go over it. She added they hope to have a copy to the Council by next week. Councilmember Doty reported he will be meeting with the personnel and labor relations committee of the League of Cities on October 26, Councilmember Doty reminded the Council of the park dedication of Silver View Park on October 29. Mayor McCarty stated he would be unable to attend, due to work comnittments, and asked Councilmember Blanchard to fill in for him. Councilmember Linke advised he had attended the Ramsey County League meeting on October 19 regard- ing waste disposal plants in Ramsey and Washington • counties. He added they hope to have a decision on a course of action by the end of the year. Mayor McCarty presented a copy of an update on cabel tv legislation to Clerk/Administrator Pauley. Mounds View City Council October 24 1983 Regular Meeting i. Page Nine ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Mayor McCarty gave a summary of the testimony he gave at the Met Council meeting on October 19. Clerk/Administrator Pauley advised that the Dire 15. Report of Department will be conducting a drill at City Administrator Hall on October 25, and they will be doing drills for all day and night shifts for all three cities. Clerk/Administrator Pauley reminded the Council that next Monday is the fifth Monday of the month, and there would be no meeting, Clerk/Administrator Pauley advised the Council of a public hearing by the Met Council on the airport issue, at 7 PM on November 1, at Westwood Jr. High in Blaine. Councilmember Blanchard requested that the flag be flown at half-mast in memory of the tragedy in Lebanon. Motion/Second: Blanchard/Linke to adjourn the 16. Adjournment meeting at 9:52 PM. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Respectfully submitted, Donald P. Pauley Clerk/Administrator CONSENT AGENDA November 1.4, 1983 The Consent Agenda is a technique dosigned to expedite handling of routine and miscellaneous official business of the City Council. The entire Agenda may he adopted by the Council in one motion. The motion for adoption is non -debatable and must receive unani- mous approval. By request of any individual Councilmember, any item can be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed upon the Regular Agenda for debate. ITEM A. Adopt Resolution No, 1.676 - Amending Development Agree- ment No. 82-52 with M & F. Realty ITEM H. Adopt Resolution No, 1677 - Approval of the Completion of Development Agreement No. 78-35 with Mounds View Develop- ment Company, Inc. ITEM C. Adopt Resolution No. 1678 - Authorizing Contributions to the North Suburban Cable Communications Commission ITEM D. Adopt Resolution No. 1679 - Endorsing the Reappointment Of Lloyd H. Scott, Sr.. to the Rice Creek Watershed District Board of Managers ` ITEM E. Adopt Resolution No. 1682 - Authorizing Interim Wetland Alteration Permit for Roger Morgan at 7395 Knollwood Drive ITEM F. Authorize Staff to Proceed with Resolution of Long Lake Road Ditch Project Pursuant to Recommendations Contained in Staff. Memorandum Dated November 3, 1983 ITEM G. Approve the Retention of Springsted, Inc, to Conduct a Cash Defeasance of the City's Improvement Bond Redemption Fund Per the Proposal Dated October 17, 1983 ITEM H. Authorize the Hiring of Six 1983-84 MFFD Program Posi- tions Pursuant• to Recommendations Contained in Staff Memorandum Dated November. 3, 1983 ITEM I. Approve Final Acceptance and Payment: for [9113 Seal Coat Project in the Amount of $34,031.06 to Allied Blacktop Company ITEM J. Approve Final Acceptance and Payment for 1983 Water. Treatment Plants 2 and 3 Modifications in the Amount of $14,828.00 to A & K Construction Company ITEM K. Licenses for Approval General - Expire 6/30/84 �. Dailey Homes - Renewal Northern Lights Remodeling - New Wayne Roger Homus - Renewal -continued- CONSENT AGENDA November 14, 1983 Page Two ITEM K. Licenses for Approval (cunt.) Heating 6 Air Conditioning - Expire 6/30/84 Preferred Sheot Metal - New shalt - Expire 6/30/84 Lino fakes Blacktop - Renewal Masons - Expire 6/30/84 fiizzell Masonry, Inc. - Renewal Gambling Device - November 30, 1983 Mounds View Lions Club - Bel -Rae Ballroom ITEM L. Adopt Resolution No. 1681 - Approving Just and Correct Claims Against City Funds 0 qtwx- RESOLUTION NO. 1676 CITY OF MOUNDS V11.-3.1 COUNTY OF RAMSEY i STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION AMENDING DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 140. 82-52 WITH M & E REALTY WHEREAS, the City of Mounds View and M & E Realty entered into Development Agreement No. 82-52 on August 23, 1982 for the Silver Lake Woods Final Plat; and WHEREAS, the final plat called Silver Lake Snoods was Exhibit A of the Development Agreement; and WHEREAS, Block 7, Lots 1 through 11, and Block 8, Lots 1 through 10, were subdivided and zoned for eight -unit buildings; and WHEREAS, the Developer of the lots requests that the lots be subdivided into two approximate halves, with each building centered on the dividing line; and WHLREAS, the subdivision of each lot into two will be for lots which still conform to area and frontage requirements; and WHEREAS, the actual subdivision line will not be exactly located until the foundation has been erected; and j WHEREAS, the subdivisions will be typical; and WHEREAS, the subdivisions will be typical and repetitive, and could be handled by City staff without the need for direction regarding each subdivision; and WHEREAS, attached is a copy entitled, Amendment to Exhibit 2A to Development Agreement• No. 82-52. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mounds View hereby amends Exhibit 2A of Development Agreement No. 82-52 as provided on the attachment. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the proposed subdivisions allowed by the amendment can be officially approved for recording by the Clerk -Administrator after proper review by appropriate City staff. ATTEST: ~ (SEAL) Adopted this 19th day of November, 1983. Mayor Clerk -Administrator AMENDMENT TO EXHIBIT 2A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 82-52 8. Subdivision of Lots 1 through 11, Block 7, and Lots 1 through 10, Block 0, approximately into halves will be allowed in order to divide the proposed eight -unit condominium building into two separate buildings. Approval of the subdivision will be granted according to the conditions found in Mounds View Resolution No. 1676. FOR THE CITY: Date: Date: I FOR THE DEVELOPER: (� A RESOLUTION No. 1677 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSF:Y STATE OF MINNESOTA APPROVAL OF '1'11E COMPLETION OF DEVELOPMENT' AGREEMENT NO. 78-35 WITH MOHNDS VIEW DNVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC. 11111itEAS, Keith '1', Ilarsta(l was required by Development Agreement No. 78-25 to provide a security in the amount of $63,435.00; and WHEREAS, the security is required to insure that the Development Agreement is in accordance with the requirements as outlined in Development Agreement No. 78-25; and WHEREAS, all conditions and requirements pursuant to Development Agreement No. 78-25 have been completed and fulfilled; NOW, THEREFORE, HE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mounds View approves the completion of the conditions and requirements in Development Agreement No. 78-25 and authorizes the release of the remaining security to Mounds View Development Company, Inc. ATTEST: (SEAL) Adopted this 14th day of November, 1983. Mayor L'lerk-Administra—to r RESOLUTION NO. 1670 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATH OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE NORTH SUBURBAN CABLE COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION WHEREAS, the North Suburban Cable Communications Commission, which Lite City of Mounds View is a member of, represents Lite ten northern Ramsey County communities in the administration of a cable T.V. franchise with Group W Cable; and WHEREAS, the North Suburban Cable Communications Commission has requested a contribution for the fourth quarter of 1983 in the amount of $2,587.50 and a 1984 contribution in the amount of $10,350.00 as an advance on the franchise fees to be paid to the City of Mounds View by Group W Cable; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of the City of Mounds View to insure the continued operation of the North Suburban Cable Communi- cations Commission to oversee the construction of the cable T.V. system and operation of local access programming. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mounds View that the payment of a fourth quarter 1983 contribution in the amount of $2,587.50 to the North Suburban Cable Communications Commission is authorized for immediate payment, with said monies coming from the 1983 Contingency account. DE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a contribution in the amount of $10,350.00 for calendar year 1984 is authorized to be made to the North Suburban Cable Communications Commission between January 1 and January 15, 1984, to be paid from the 1984 Contingency account. ATTEST: (SEAL) Adopted this 14th day of November, 1983. Mayor Clerk -Administrator `lt7 RESOLUTION N0, 1679 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION ENDORSING THE REAPPOINTMENT OF LLOYD 11. SCOTT, SR. TO THE RICE CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT BOARD OF MANAGERS WHEREAS, Lloyd Scott, a resident of the City of Mounds View, has served on the Rice Creek Watershed District Board of Managers for the past several years; and WHEREAS, Lloyd Scott has served the interests of the Rice Creek Watershed District in a professional and enthusiastic manner; and WHEREAS, Lloyd Scott's term of office with the Rice Creek Watershed District Board of Managers expires on January 17, 1984; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of the City of Mounds View that Lloyd Scott be reappointed to the Rice Creek Watershed District Board of Managers. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mounds View endorses the reappointment of Lloyd H. Scott, Sr. to the Rice Creek Watershed District Board of Managers. ATTEST: (SEAL) Adopted this 19th day of November, 1983. Mayor Clerk -Administrator RESOLUTION NO. 16132 VIL % CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE' OF MINNESOTA ABSOLUTION AUTHORI'LING IN'1'IiR[M WETLAND ALTERATION PERMIT FUR ROGER MORGAN AT 7395 KNOLLWOOD DRIVE WHIiRRAS, Mr. Roger. Morgan at 7395 Knollwood Drive commenced activities within wetland 1-15 located within his rear yard, and WHEREAS, Mr. Roger. Morgan was requested to cease and desist wetland alteration activities pending application for an alteration permit; and application WHEREAS, made onfor a wetland alterationNpermit rper City Code; and EAS er before theRMoundstViewgCityoCouncil toan nvember explain his8proposeded activities; and WHEREAS, Mr. Roger Morgan is requesting to complete wetland i modifications for the purpose of enhancing wildlife habitat and correction of erosion problems occurring, and WHEREAS, Mr. Roger Morgan desires to obtain the necessary approvals to complete alteration activities; and identical EtoAactivities undertaken wildlifehabitatimprovementMactivittiesacompletedre similarbyr at least three of the neighbors adjoining wetland 1-15; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mounds View authorizes Mr. Roger Morgan a temporary wetland alteration permit to restore the wetland habitat rear yard initiated on October 29in his , 1983. Said restoration activities shall include: a) Leveling and redistribution of material excavated from the wetland area; b) Temporary seeding of the area disturbed by alteration activities; c) Installation of erosion control measures to preclude further siltation of the wetland area; HE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mounds View authorizes staff to work with Mr. Rorger Morgan and other agencies such as the Rice Creek Watershed District, the Ramsey Soil and Water Conservation District, the Minnesota RNSI)LIITIQN NO. I6H2 PAGE TWO bw Department of Natural Resources and the u.S. Fish and Wildlife ' Service to investigate techniques that might be suitable to compb!te the watland OWL % habitat improvements desired by Mr, Morgan. Said staff act•ivitien shall be reported back to the City Council for purposes of determining whether a permanent• alteration permit will be issued to Mr. Roger Morgan. ATTEST: (SEAL) Adopter) this loth day of November, 1903. yor Clerk -Administrator. V� 0 MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Director. of Public Works/Community Development DATE: November 10, 1983 SUBJECT: FINAL ACCEPTANCE AND APPROVAL OF FINAL PAYMENT FOR 1983 SEAL COAT PROJECT FOR ALLIED BLACKTOP COMPANY Staff has reviewed the work completed by Allied Blacktop for the 1983 Seal Coat Project and has found that the work has been completed in conformance with the specifications and contract dated September 12, 1903. 'rho original budgeted amount for the 1983 seal coat work was $35,000.00 from the revenue sharing funds. The contract was a unit price contract and the final quantities were 18,546 gallons bituminous material and 963.85 tons of seal coat aggregate resulting in a final contract price of $34,031.06. The final contract price is slightly above the original contract price determined after the bid opening which is due to a slight increase in bituminous and aggregate quantities. The increase is well within the tolerance expected for this kind of work. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council approve final payment to Allied Blacktop Company in the amount of $34,031.06 and that the final acceptance date be set as October 14, 1983. JCJ/bc MR z i ` t lLT MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Director. of Pub is Work s/CoMnunity Development DATE: November 10, 1983 sUUJECT: APPROVAL OF FINAL PAYMENT AND FINAL ACCEPTANCE FOR TREATMENT PLANT 2 AND 3 MODIFICATIONS BY A & K CONSTRUCTION COMPANY A & K Construction Company has completed all of the final punch list items on the above referenced project. As previously reported to the City Council, the equipment has been in operation since early August, 1983 and staff has noted significant improve- ment in the water quality being produced in treatment plants 2 and 3. The City is in receipt of a recommendation from Tolz, King, Duvall, Anderson and Associates recommending that the City approve final payment and accept the work as being in conformance with the plans and specifications. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council approve the final payment for A & K Construction Company in the amount of $14,828.00 and set the date of official acceptance as November 14, 1983. Issuance of the final payment check shall be conditioned upon receipt• from the contractor of the necessary Department of Revenue certifications of payment of taxes and release forms from the contractor's bond company and resolve of claim for damaged case iron fitting at treatment plant 2. JCJ/bc 1681 lL-/ItkL e, —.10209 18224 - .-.. -.- - in 40,344.06 18230 7 — ------- ill Will• 34,180,77 12406 12520 in LI:c mr-loil ql 40,275.97 .". W.8-oo.8o la) I," UMI, .list:; or 01.1 ()tr,(:jj Of MOlLnds Viol, . . ..... — i'llu thited �. by the NECESSARY DIRECT ESPENDITURES CHECK AMOUNT CLAIMANT 18225 $ 616.86 State Treasurer 18226 734.40 First State Bank 18228 2,610.00 John C. Johnson 18230 30,219.51 First State Bank $34,180.77 PURPOSE Surcharge fees Salaries Salaries Salaries l r�u5 I� _I .:�-F,hit PaYAEIE - --_--------- is _ le u • = li t l oii. t CSTOGc :t•.15 13.!J � :.�t Y �..r,r r 1 i L _ - ---- ff v:_ i..:16 26r;3.r.:S F!•:iT _T4l :.r� F rL.i..:r lL: �,es, cv1511.46 :V.11 isc:.;.Ur. 2�945.e5 G:•.0UP hE4LTh 131i+t, INC G�CLF in`l IC f T' d17:2J 6.0J t1FlI.I CIkT? h C F L t U• 84.10 FIGaIIY t,U 6LARAnTi Gn OUF In_l •JLl �y I°ti - �°f cIPFL; ab ..:,CPtI•I �,r L"C1T hi4LIH f Flan ai !b.l•..51• � --�°v :1 124 0:.. CITY CF hCUttGS Vl,r. trt. i Y F kUiTLEc: SIt,, l.;;l I-,r•l IL • se _ I II 1 CLE ;i �''• -'"I 1. 1'� %I ��.i I n L • • 'i• Ohl v -------------------- L 111424 4 : . I -- `I ! I , - 1. , , ! i I ; - . t " , 112433 L L L C t 012434 T L I ALL 'U' 1 4 3 4 1, 4 3 t; T I. -4 i 1712437 7i, 7 012438 100..0 A L C 0 12 439 208. 5 T L 1 Li: 4 4 4 1 711, L I LA OIZ445 -i-t L I IUL � t 012447 -11 ? 4 4 8 17 T t 7 r .1 t, t 'I LT LFr.L, h;f.tlTr. :f Lc L !n. Is IL r L iC L I c L L C aNC-N- 4 L IAL L I L I( F. I U A f F ELECT CLL C 1 1 C 1 Li L 1 L L I TY LLE I - F _ELECT L L N I L L L L I U1 F y j :11 4 a. U 1 ,FCC Ft (,K* t, 17416 11245 L 012M 12453 L. 1 ?4 rib 012457 012458 J12459 ' 12 4Cu L 7: 34. 3 9 i 7 c r .3 9 L . '. 7 L L i - 11 i; C E! I r 14 L i: S f ': i : 11 5.49 11% C C F i V 0 C L F. T 73.JC hLLTc '; i.iSPC:,,L':rPV1'.r 43.89 If A I E P PRL 0 CC IS CO A 4 . e I CITY Of hHlTr. ILAr Li,r,: 12461 9 7, 1- 247.56 5 t) A 1; a 12463 - 124�4 aUlob5 012466 j 012467 17.51 A.1 3 h n1246A '42 . 60 L i N I L C I C C 9 L S L H E 1, 5 A T lCi i,L - I.-L F F L I t 1116 t F F L I E S F 1 L L ff.,Si C C L L L, f C; L F F L It CIP:,,, i ll,( SLFPL liSCPcRATIhL fa PtV-SALAS llS,IEVFWAI'T IIPE C L I S L A N " L F. I's A I jcn 16SAL SM I L . C 111Lh F c, r i,:I, L :L L 11 17471 C1?47? 91Z47d - 17474 1'475 1. 474 1;11! 0 7 ---.1'47d C12479 0124d0 Sr ]12'vft2 r 0124tl3 12464 i 124.95 u124dn P12487 C1248A "'�'•' 012489 d1249G Q12491 ' 7. 97.5; 3:... 4:.u0 ESG.72 27. LS 77. 4E:..': SE.4) Gi.49 3@.v7 r'ILL p, Y , it . ;,I- L L V IYt' f4•r'1 �� C .iriL•.1' F: pt:E Cf) Ih'- kr I- T y 1�, Si:F:iSr:Y 1 j04', Ihl •,UI :hl irOLNLAI:L L•� I.. FCGr.uF hFC6rrF it:1,lC1L;; �• In PnCC�rF ir51:iLCTOF� M��' s ,r ITh1F i C F L ICiiL S::nV u F.IFFLIL$rCF t"IINI -----jiel� EP.� FIli It 6 CTHEn FFCFLSS1Chr1L SC�U 1y� • I� :•I L It CITY • Chi C,l• r: ' G1249_> 4i.SJ C! r.4 U10"i. �12496 Cf hl.:t ill G12493 2:.�� C• iNr I ilY"h ' "• 012499 Z:'.'9 Lis")• i-712i1Ci :Q:.,.c r.?.1 ni1LiPG ,�E d12501 40.L0 dCf• .;•t � '012502 30.0e ILA CAALC 312503 9'.. ' i h rirL.'l IST t .. H_lnHAr, Gt2SO4 40.u. Cuvinl: ::rAr *312505 40.G9 r+i(:.�e L ILC G1Z5�e 4?.C_ J. G125G7 146.!;G h!' : ru, l Cu:l Y Y j. t _ r,0 12500 24.c0 Ti- U Cr CF cL,C CF .arn 012510 31. 40 EI S :? WK- n��tvi2:J11 ll.eu t :•. I•Llf, IN iFuh!P.1 012512 4I.1:; N1'•. 1'J b':A - U12613 3S. i9 L=4%i rir,L:: __ T C12514 3S.110 CHARLCIIE NLS hAt, A12515 21i. i� r�,^CC,h rLt,C�rC,;� :. 012616 27.?1 ,u„u-r��n il\T Y IsNP-C ki2517 29.76 CAM CAIOUL i FMf,C6G < lu c rr:r F"cFi_,;f:naE 7 s � -—— Ju CCtYFi-EnCii ,,• s rcFtrr.; Ile p =EFIn ; — -- b JI LJJ_ J] . IJ , r L'• L : ?e hJ • k J .. A la /] • o LIb FiF,11 `.s Lllr.f Isl� J] v sJ 0 PCE eI • LrrtIES,CFfk]I t{L -----�„ . is L f• I 1 e, T uF fit uWj,. V1 ' CI!i CK° d N G 1 i -----.1 012511 T.i4 VYL0 i.,.I- ; 11251 i 12. 73— e • 520 d17.,:5 v 115 40,27 .'i7 CHCCK Da Ile TOTAL UI 131 CFECK� TOTAL :Ce •'..:' — —„ s !71 p, m �u •. __—._ ------fin 34 �kGeilac. RESOLUTION NO. 1680 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE. OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION COMMENDING THE IRONDALE KNIGHTS GIRLS SOCCER TEAM AS STATE GIRLS SOCCER CHAMPIONS WHEREAS, the Irondale Knights Girls Soccer Team had a regular season record of 15 wins and 3 losses; and WHEREAS, the Irondale Knights Girls Soccer Team parti- cipated in the State Girls Soccer Championship; and WHEREAS, the Irondale Knights Girls Soccer Team has won the 1983 State Girls Soccer Championship title. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mounds View, on behalf of the residents of the City of Mounds View, hereby congratulate and heartily commend the Irondale Knights Girls Soccer Team on being the 1983 State Girls Soccer Champions. Adopted this 14th day of November, 1983. ATTEST: Mayor McCarty Councilmember B anchard Councilmember Doty Councilmember Hankner Councilmember Linke (SEAL) Clerk -Administrator Pauley 1-. ORDINANCE N0. 350 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE. AMENDING CHAPTER 48 OF THE MOUNDS VIEW MUNICIPAL CODE ENTITLED, "WETLAND ZONING ORDINANCE:" The City Council of the City of Mounds View does hereby "ordain: SECTION I. The wetland zoning district mnp as established in 48.15, Subdivision I of the Municipal Code, is hereby amended by removing Wetiand I.U. No. 1-22 from the wetland zoning district map. SECTION II. This ordinance shall take effect thirty days after the date of its publication. Read by the Council of the Cit,v of Mounds View on the 14th day of November, 1983. Read and passed by the Council of the City of Mounds View this day of November, 1983. ATTEST: (SEAL) APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney Mayor Clerk —Administrator V1!%1L /O ORDINANCI; NO. 151 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 48 OF TIIR MOUNDS VIEW MUNICIPAL. CODE ENTITLED, "WETLAND ZONING ORDINANCE" The City Council of the City of Mounds View does hereby ordain: SECTION I. The wetland zoning district map at; established In 48.15, Subdivision 1 of the Municipal Code, is hereby amended by redeIineatIng the wetland boundary for Wetland I.U. No. 1-23 as per the attached exhibit. SECTION 11. This ordinance shall take effect thirty days after the date of its publication. Read by the Council of the City of Mounds View on the 14th day of November, 1983. Read and passed by the Council of the City of Mounds View His day of November, 1983. ATTEST: yor (SEAT.) Clerk—Admintstrntor APPROVED AS TO FORM: ,1t City Attorney— ------ "MO TO: Mounds View City Coun•il ""OM: INruce K. Andersor .or Parks, Recreatio1 a Lstry 13ATB: November 9, 1983 Itb': City Newsletter bids Bids For the 19114 City Newsletter will h(%. opened on Thursday morning, November 10 at 10:30 a.m. As I will be on vacation on Thursday, I will not have a chance to review the bid proposals and provide a staff recommendation until Monday, November 14, 1993. I have enclosed a copy of the bid specifications, that were submitted to twenty-four different bidders, for your review and I will have a complete staff report reviewing the bid Proposals and providing staff recommendation for the 1984 City Newsletter on Monday. Should you have any questions, feel free to give :ne a call on ' Monday morning at 784-3055, ext. 941, BKA/sll V.� ADVI:It'1,1SNMENT FOR li[OS FOR PU13LISIlING SIX CITY Nh:WSLB'I"ERRS FOR THE CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW, MINNESOTA The City Council of Mounds Vie publishing of six (fi) w will receive sealer! bids for the City Newsletters, Bids will be received until 10:30 a.m. C.S.T., on Wednesday, November 10, 1983 at the City Hall, 2401 Highway 10, Mounds View, Minnesota at which time and place the bids shall be opened, read aloud, and considered. Proposal forms, including specifications, are on file and may be obtained at the office of the Mounds View Parks, Recreation and Forestry Department, Proposals must be made on the forms as furnished, and shall be submitted to the Parks, Recreation and Forestry Department on or before the time stated above. Proposals must be placed in a sealed envelope with an indication thereon stating "proposal for publishing of six City Newsletters contained herein", and addressed to the City of Mounds View, 2401 Highway 10, Mounds View, Minnesota 55112. All bids must_ be accompanied by a cash deposit, and/or certified check payable to the City of Mounds View in the amount equal to five percent (58) of the total bid, The City Council reserves the right to accept or reject any or Ill bids, to waive any informalities in the bid, and to make such award as it may deem to be in the best interest of the City, Donald F. Pauley Clerk -Administrator City of Mounds View PUBLISH: NEW BRICHTON BULLETIN REVIEW: November 3, 1983 INSTRUCTION TO BIDDERS Bidders are required to submit their bids in accordance with the following conditions: PROPOSAL The bidder shall submit his proposal on forms as furnished in these specifications. Only proposals which are submitted on the original form attached hereto will be considered. The City reserves the right to reject any or all proposals and to waive irregularities and informalities therein and further reserves the right to award the contract in its best interests. The bidder may view past copies of the newsletter upon request. BID SECURITY No proposals shall be considered unless accompanied by a cash deposit and/or certified check in the amount of five percent (5%) of the tendered bid. All forms of bid guarantee shall be t forfeited to the City of Mounds View as liquidated damages. " NET BID Net bid shall be for furnishing the units as specified. DFT.TVERY The number of days necessary to complete publication will be a determining factor in making the award. PAYMENT Payment in full, for the publication received, shall be made by the City within thirty (30) days of completion of each of the six publications, acceptance by the City and receipt of itemized billing from the vendor.. Billing shall be made on a per page cost. n SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLISHING SIX CITY NEWSLETTERS • CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW OCTOBER 28, 1983 SPECIFICATIONS FOR I r�\ PUIil,ISIIING SIX CITY NEWSLETTERS FOR THE CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW, MINNESOTA 1. GENERAL These specifications contemplate the printing and publishing for the City of Mounds View six (6) newsletters on a bi-monthly basis for the year 1984. The bid will be awarded on the thirty-two (32) page format, with the exceptions of the May/June issue which will consist of thirty-six (36) pages, and should be bid per page. The bidder shall furnish only the highest quality materials and workmanship. Failure to do this will be cause for rejection. The bidder shall show ability to supply artwork, graphics, photo reproduction, layout, proof reading, pickup and delivery, and storage. The bidder shall be required to show proof of past performance of publishing comparable to that requested by the City. Bids not complying with these specifications will be rejected. If additional features are incorporated at no cost to the City, they may be noted on the proposal form, but they will not be treated as substitutions for required features. The first issue will be delivered to the City of Mounds View in mid -December, 1983. 2. PAPER STOCK The Newsletter shall be B-1/2 x 11 inches. The paper shall be off-white in color, 601E basis weight capable of reproducing well via offset process for bolls solids and half -tones. (See enclosed) 3. INK The ink used to print will be different color for each Newsletter. The colors of ink to be used are normal PMS numbers. 4. STAPLING AND F'OLDII4G Each Newsletter will be folded to the B-1/2 x 11 inch size as previously described and saddle -stitched. (See enclosed) 5. TIME OF DELIVERY The bidder will supply an c (8) work day delivery to the City of Mounds View upon rec.±i;' n•t car--ra-ready copy. 6. LATE CHARGE The bidder shall be assessed a penalty of $100.00/day for each day after the newsletter is not completed and delivered to the City Hall after the eight (0) wurk day period. 7. COPY VARIANCE The City of Mounds View will provide camera-ready copy with some exceptions such as half. -tones, photographs, graphs, etc. Each bidder should bid his costs for these additional services beyond the price/page on the form provided. 0. COPY CHANGES The City of Mounds View will assume financial responsibility for any copy changes or corrections that are requested by the City. 9. PROJECTED TIME SCHEDULE Brochure Months City Material to Printer January/February December 7, 1993 March/April February 8, 1984 May/June April 4, 1984 July/August June 6, 1984 September/October August 8, 1984 November/December October 10, 1984 Printer's Final Copy to the City December 16, 1983 February 17, 1984 April 13, 1984 June 15, 1984 August 17, 1984 October 19, 1984 PROPOSAL FORM FOR PUBLISHING OF SIX CITY NEWSLETTERS FOR THE CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW MOUNDS VIEW, MINNESOTA 55112 To Whom It May Concern: In accordance with the advertisment of the City, we propose to furnish and deliver six (6) City Newsletters on a bi-monthly basis, in accordance with the specifications on file in the Mounds View Parks, Recreation and Forestry Department at the price shown: NOTE: BID PRICE MUST BE GIVEN IN BOTH WORDS AND NUMBERS UNIT #1 - COST PER PAGE FOR PRINTING OF SIX CITY NEWSLETTERS, 4,600 COPIES EACH PRINTING. UNIT #2 - COSTS FOR ADDITIONAL SERVICES. HALF TONES PHOTOGRAPHS ART REDUCTIONS ADDITIONAL ART WORK/HOUR 00 DOLLARS $ 100 DOLLARS S 100 DOLLARS $ 100 DOLLARS $ 100 DOLLARS S `n.10"t"' hcrewith find (cash deposit) (certified check) in the amount Of S being at lease five percent (5%) M1 If the amount of Our proposal, made payable to the City of Mounds View as a proposal guarantee which it is agreed by the undersiguild, will be forfeited in the event that the contract is not executed if awarded to the undersigned. REMARKS: NAME OF FIRM BY ITS TITLE ADDRESS DATED: WITNESSED: MEMO TO: Clerk -Administrator and City Council FROM: Building Inspector ` I - DATE: November 14, 1983 / SUBJECT: NORB YENISII GRADING PERMIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 83-61 Mr. Norb Yenish, proposed developer of the 70 unit motel to be located next to McDonald's, has requested that he be granted to perform the initial ground and grading work for his development. Depending on weather conditions, he plans to get at least the foundation work done with the structure itself starting in the spring. if that is permissible with the Council, staff would issue permits accordingly pursuant to approved plan included in the development agreement and require a substantial escrow to cover potential erosion control measurements ($4,000 - $5,000). In addition, Rice Creek Watershed District has issued a permit. RECOMMENDATION: Either authorize staff to proceed with the partial 1 perm is (grading and foundation) with proper escrows or direct us to require full permit and fees at this time. SAR/bc if .fr \ \ • �r7 t n O N . I, � w w --rcnN •/ma's'. ,a n � N > N S � Ns} S6h9 S9/B SC6B l[h? MJ 168 Hr r CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW CITY COUNCIL AGENDA SESSION November 21, 1983 7:00 p.m. 1. Consideration of Resolution No. 1678, as revised, authorizing contributions to the North Suburban Cable Communications Commission. 2. Review Chapter 40 text and map recommendations from Planning Commission. (Material handed out 11/7/83 packet.) 3. Consideration of staff memorandum on status of asphalt hot- box and oil sprayer purchase for street repairs. 4. Consideration of Police Chief Performance Goals and salary. 5. Discussion of Ordinance Nos. 350 and 351 relating to the modification of 1-22 and 1-23 wetland boundaries. 6. Discussion of Fairchild Avenue right-of-way vacation request. 7. Consideration of Civil Defense Mutual Aid Agreement. 8. Status report on Special Projects by Director of Public Works/Community Development. (Material to be handed out Monday.) 9. Consideration of staff memorandums for special assessment reapportionments for: a) Lot 10, Block 7, Silver Lake woods, for Mary Anderson Condominium Subdivision. b) Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Programmed Land, Second Addition. 10. Considcration of streetlight request from the Mounds View School District. 11. Consideration of staff memorandum regarding completion of Mermaid addition and release of development agreement. 12. Consideration of staff response to November 11, 1983 letter from Michael L. Hadtrath. L, 13. Discussion of appointmentsto Energy Council and staffing arrangements. RESOLUTION 140. 1678 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE NORTH SUBURBAN CABLE COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION WHEREAS, the North Suburban Cable Communications Commission, which the City of Mounds View is a member of, represents the ten northern Ramsey County communities in the administration of a cable T.V. franchise with Group W Cable; and WHEREAS, the North Suburban Cable Communications Commission has requested a contribution for the fourth quarter of 1983 in the amount of $2,587.50 and a 1984 contribution in the amount of $10,350.00 as an advance on the franchise fees to be paid to the City of Mounds View by Group W Cable; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of the City of Mounds View to insure the continued operation of the North Suburban Cable Communi- cations Commission to oversee the construction of the cable T.V. system and operation of local access programming. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mounds View that the payment of a fourth quarter 1983 contribution in the amount of $2,587.50 to the North Suburban Cable Communications Commission is authorized for immediate payment, with said monies coming from the 1983 Contingency account. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Mounds View's 1984 Budget is amended to include a revenue line item for cable T.V. franchising fees in the amount of $10,350.00 and an expenditure line item under the Advisory Commissions account in a similar amount, and that a contribution in the amount of $10,350.00 for calendar year 1984 is authorized to be made to the North Suburban Cable Communica- tions Commission between January 1 and January 15, 1984, to be paid from the aforementioned line item in the Advisory Commission account of the General Fund. ATTEST: (SEAL) \I- Adopted this 28th day of November, 1983. Clerk -Administrator MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council i FROM: Clerk -Administrator- DATE: Novemher 1.6, 1983 SUBJECT: 1984 CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE NORTH SUBURBAN CABLE COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION In order to be able to adequately respond to the Mayor's concerns regarding the adequacy of cable T.V. franchising fees to fund contributions to the North Suburban Cable Communications Commission, I contacted Mr. Roger Franke, who is the Executive Director of the Commission, and requested that he be present at the November 21st Agenda Session to review this issue with you and the provisions of the cable T.V. franchise in order that you might be adequately advised prior to making your determination to make the contributions outlined in Resolution No. 1678 attached to this memorandum. DFP/pf Attachment 0 3 MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Director. of Public Works/Community Development DATE: November 17, 1983 SUBJECT: ASPHALT HOT BOX AND OIL SPRAYER FOR STREET MAINTENANCE The following memo addresses a question raised at the Council meeting on November 14, 1983, concerning the status of the purchase of a asphalt hot box and oil sprayer for street maintenance work. The 1983 revenue sharing budget allocated $5,200.00 for an asphalt hot box and $2,000.00 for an oil sprayer. The origindl budget amount was based on acquiring a unit manufactured by the Minnesota Correctional Industries at Stillwater. The device is a heated bituminous mix trailer which is mounted on a trailer. Attached is a copy of a picture illustrating the product. The current price F.O.B. Stillwater, Minnesota is $6,500. Staff has not had an opportunity to visually inspect or see the unit demonstrated. Since early spring staff, when time was available, has attempted to find comparible pieces of equipment so that we might get alternate quotations prior to recommending a purchase to the City Council. To date, we have been successful in contacting two other firms and have had an opportunity to watch demonstrated a third unit manufactured in Joplin, Missouri. Each of the units have their own merits and none of the prices were readily comparible across the board. Because of the uniqueness of the type of the device that we are talking about for Mounds View application, it is difficult to write a specification for bidding purposes. The following firms were contacted,• and I have attached illustrations of the equipment they have available: 1. Stepp Manufacturing Company, Inc. of North Branch, Minnesota. The Stepp Company has three devices that might be useful to our application. The first unit is a master -mix tailgate mixer which only allows heating up of material prior to depositing it on the roadway in the patch area. The estimated cost is $5,800.00 and this does not include a oil sprayer for tack coating and crack filling purposes. The next unit is a trailer mounted pre -mix heater which comes in three sizes ranging in capacity from 1.3 cubic yards to 2.7 cubic yards and prices ranging from $3,750.00 to $7,680.00. This unit can have an oil tank for tack coating and crack filling for an additional $500.00 installed, and a tool cleaning compartment and device for an additional $325.00. The last unit manufactured by Stepps is a recycler-mixer. This is a trailer mounted device that will grind and recondition the asphalt removed from a pavement repair Mayor and City Council November 17, 1.983 Page Two area and acid additional oil to it if necessary so that it can be replaced .into the 11010. Phis unit does include an oil tank for tack coat.inq and crack filling. It currently lists at $18,750.00. There is a unit that currently has been used for demonstration purposes that might be available at a discount of up to 10 percent. 2. Contractors Machinery & Supply, Inc. of Eagan, Minnesota has sent up material on the Bomag AR 6 mobile asphalt recycler. Attached are copies of the literature furnished by the supplier. This unit is manufactured by the Koehring Construction Equipment Company of Dayton, Ohio. Current P.O.B. factory price for the AR 6 unit is $10,975.00. 3. The other unit that was demonstrated in Roseville was a device called the Pothole Patcher which is manufactured and distributed by RGS Industries, Inc. of Joplin, Missouri. Attached are illustrations of this device. This unit is intended to be a one-man asphalt patch repair unit and is a mechanism to keep the asphalt warm and also to operate the other miscellaneous tools used in patching asphalt streets. The truck mounted unit without the truck currently lists at $18,950.00 and a trailer mounted unit lists at $26,950.00. 9. Staff was made aware on November 14, 1983, that Model Stone Company located in Minneapolis had an oil sprayer unit for sale for $1,800.00. Upon contacting the construction company, it was determined that the unit is only for heating, spraying, and crack filling of oil and does not have any capacity for keeping asphalt mix warm as the devices described above would allow. Prior to recommending to the Council acquisition of any one of the above described devices, the maintenance department had hoped to have demonstrations or physically inspect the units so that we'would be assured the unit would meet our needs. Both the distributors of the Bomag unit and the Stepp's Manufacturing unit for recycling material have offered to come out and demonstrate their equipment. Staff still anticipates yet this year to do that so that a recommendation can be made to the City Council for purchase of the unit in 1983. As can be seen by the prices listed above, the $7,200.00 in the revenue sharing account may not be sufficient to cover the cost of a unit that would allow recycling of bituminous pavements. Staff is of the opinion, due to repair work completed in 1983, that a significant amount of the existing bituminous material in our streets is of sufficient quality to allow recycling if we had the equipment to do that. Recycling of the existing bituminous would greatly reduce the cost of new asphalt required for street repair work. The current price per ton for asphalt material is running $22.50. If we were is 1. Mayor and City Council November 17, 1.983 Page Three able to recycle the existing bituminous material, we could prubably reduce the cost of material per patch by 60 to 80 percent depending on the size and type of patch. As previously mentioned, staff has not been able to complete its research of which machines could or might best meet Mounds View's needs and, therefore, a recommendation has not been prepared for. Council action. Staff would like to take this opportunity to receive Council input• as to whether they feel we should pursue investigation of units that could recycle existing bituminous pavements. If we pursue this option, staff would have to identify additional sources of monies to cover the increased cost in equipment I purchase. One possible source of money would be to utilize monies that were budgeted for asphalt material purchase in 1984 that might a not be needed if we are able to recycle existing bituminous pavements. In either case, prior to recommending to the Council a purchase, staff will obtain written quotations from the suppliers and prepare a more detailed equipment comparison for Council review and consideration. JCJ/bc HEAT ED of T uiviiivvuare MIX TRAILER Designed by Minnesota Highway Dept. for Road Repair • 2.7 Cubic yard Capacity • Two 200,000 BTU Burners • Two 100 LB. Tank Holders • 28.5 Gallon Heated Liquid Asphalt Tank • Separate Heater for Liquid • 4 Wheal Hydraulic Surge Brakes PRICE only $6,500 — F.0.13. Stillwater, MN. For Comploto Spocs. Writer or call MINNESOTA CORRECTIONAL INDUSTRIES IF.LENIONE 612•439.1910 fxt. 325 ON 55 STILLWA1fO, MN 55002 For Fill FxcU, Write 105 on Rader Service Cud 26 STEPP'S MASTER -MIX G60 TAILGATE MILER S u E u 11 l � ll u �1.71 0 CO,, NCO o North Branch, or 617 291.76 7'056 �9'I 612ota 5674-0492 1 C I I 30 sTEPP"s PREwMIX HEATER AA& IA AID A ^/►& NA I A n AS' •.I. .. . OUMt HtA5UIV5 WHY 11- 5 TOPS IN Ct 3 L f; ASPHALT PATCHING EQUIPMENT I I I ` ' H--:--i P_I: shovclirg platform ' LP gas torch ' Heavy duty rectangular tubing ' Adjustable stand Food F Leaf spring exel • Durable steel fenders F Heavy duty transport tires I• • Optional shovel cleaning tank , Double wall construction ' Optional Constant Ignition System 4 Hi•tomporaturo insulation ' Optional tack tank i [~ �j'4 jjr jj}� Al rtt t}'d �{'o S u ILLI".,d III{J' lI1YY 1111 IllH 1`11JI11 0 o ® t� T �o North Branch, Minnesota 2-674 C IOVI C Phonea:6127679-0491, 612�674d492 � 00 0 ,,.Fn.1moaao CO. r 34 sTEPP's RECYCLERmMIXER "PLUS" FEATURES Can be operated from truck hydrau lic system or its own power supply r Automatic 100% shut-off safety valve i Hi -temp insulation ACTUALLY RECYCLE OLD 611TUMINOUSI Dump the old mix into the aggregate bin, re- heat and mix in asphalt oil to replenish that which has evaporated through the aging pro- c9ss.You can reclaim all of your aggregate and from 75%to 95%of your oil content INDIRECT FIRE HEATING METHOD Designed for recycling old bituminous mix v .. This bituminous mixer is trailer mounted and has a 10 cu. ft. mixing chamber capacity with a hydraulically driven pugmill. The mixing and heating unit has four 500,000 BTU burners. The mixing outlet gate open= to alloy partial or complete discharge of the mixture onto the shoveling apron. The top-nounted ire -heat aggregate bin is designed so that it can Fe loaded trcm the ground with a loader or shoveled manually from a trucl: into hopper. The aggregate is heated, then dumped into the mixinn chanter where it is combined with hot asphalt oil which is metered from a 120 gallon asphalt tank. The mixing chamber enables you to produce special mixes for custom jobs. This unit may also be u" as a portaL•le on-the-job batch bituminous mixer. The unit in equipped with a 120 oallon flue type asphalt. kettle with power spray bar. This entitles the operator to add oil to mixinn chamber, fill cracks, or tank coat areas prior to repairi.ne. Kettle, has 350,000 UP lipoid LP torch, temperature gauge and 2 1/2" draw. Specifications on opposite page. I 4 S L 1L411 11 II LLL `Oc COog IN North GMinnuturo 55058 Phone: 612.674A491, 612.6744492 p or G12.291-7691.7692 27 MIX AND HEAT AS YOU GO ALONG Heating patching malcrial makes stn:t:t and road repairs easier and longer lasting. Your paid, ing can be done in any temperature. "Master -Mix" with its heated mixing chamber and revers ing action pugmill makes for faster healing of your cold stockpiled material to working temper atures. Use your stockpiled hol mix or blade -mixed material any time of the year for a longer lasting repair to your asphalt roads. Material being mixed never comes in contact with the heating flame. Therefore, none of your adhering oils are burned off by the open flame, leaving no danger of exploding or burning gases from over -heated material exposed to an open flame. "Master -Mix" is a compact unit which hooks to the tailgate of your truck, and has its own tele- scoping legs to stand on when not in use or when being transferred from one truck to another. "Master -Mix" may be hooked up or dropped off in minutes by simply raising the box, backing the truck into place, and lowering the box. The, hooks will catch the tailgate.. The "Master -Mix" heating chamber and pugmill are made of special heat and wear -resistant steel for a longer pro- ducing machine —no gear boxes, chains m slip clutches. The pugmill is driven by a hydraulic motor lur simplicity and salety to the operator —no chains or gears to wear out or get caught in. We use, stainless steel fins to absorb and transfer heat to the pugmill. The hydraulic motor is powered by a Gresen pump driven by a Briggs & Stratton 94horsepower engine. Mixing action is controlled by a single hydraulic valve with built-in bypass for simplicity and safety to opera- tor and machine. "Master -Mix" may be had without hydraulic pump and engine upon special order, to be adap- ted to the use of your maintenance truck's present hydraulic system if it is of sufficient capaci- ty. SPECIFICATIONS FOR STEPP'S MASTER -MIX TAILGATE MIXER Model G-60 Capacity 5 to 7 ton per hour Pugmill Forward and reverse action, 02 cu. ft., heat jacketed Replaceable steel liners and mixing blades made of wear -resistant steel Hatching hopper Heated, 2 cu. ft., with quick dump gate Heating system Insulated fire box, burner, liquid, LPG with hose, regulator, valve and all necessary connections to bottle Drive Gas engine Air-cooled, gas 9-HP Briggs & Stratton or equal, complete with tank Hydraulic Char -Lynn or equal hydraulic motor; direct drive to pugmill, with Gresen pump or equal; Gresen valve or equal; Model AlO3 filter or equal; and 12-gal, tank, complete with necessary hoses Material pan Hinged steel collector with direct drop position Mounting Truck tailgate with telescopic legs Warranty 6 months on parts and workmanship Contractors ® Machinery �' Supply, Inc. -- Nick Gdlen . i II mobile asphalt recycier HOT PATCH '&, ,'o-n aIvages Ilul Patch ""le produces IIr,llrqualily asphalt palching nmtcrcd from pulvenmd or chunk as. ph;dl. Material Is placed through the drum Opening when_- it is healed and mixed to patch. Oil Consish"ncy Colninuolp, MIX capability makes for quick patching. d r VRojr an, v , a . . I g ; 0b • Up to five tons of 300'F recvled asphall pet hnnl . Produce permanent patches. Allows lasiel. Inoiv Olcclive congnchon: hot patches have greater strength, longer life. Patch during cold or incloment weather-- no need to rely upon mix plants which shut down in winter Patch with minimal Sol up —pull up In he ,nnlheln pa irCa an1.-. . . re ,e patch • Minimum frallic lie•up•-coulp1cl sire Mows positioning on narrow streets and parking lots. Recycle efficiently —burner heats without excessive asphalt oxidation and burns emissions that othonvise cruse, polhtiml. Meels Slate and Fed oral regulations for particulate olnis• $ions based on results of E.P.A. Method 5 test program administered in May of 1981. Improve scrap material If nncc;,- s1ly. addtives nnd'ur agglriGil.• ...... be added to the mix. , Additional savings —Hat leaf h I 01ir0iaa105 the need to rlc.p�• selap asphalt romoved from m, I - Men • Airport apron patching Parking lot and recreational area maintenance , Highway and street repair r-.. Sewer and utility cut repair 6 sh HOT PATCH Pam... Is The Answer Using proper patching techniques, an economical permanent patch can be produced with Hot Patch Pete, any time of the year .. , winter, spring, summer or fall. Long term cost savings of permanent patching eliminate the dangers and ndaled exponses caused by the pothole crisis. Simple Step-by-step Patching Preparing subbase Fill with asphalt mixture Tark Coat Application Proper compaction is needed Hot Patch Potholes From Scrap Material Anytime of the Year BEFORE: Pothole waiting to: bend a rim, blow a lire, or cause injury to a bicyclist. Proper preparation is very Important. Cut the outline of the patch at least one foot (0.3 m) outside the area to be patched. The outline should be square or rectangular with straight and vertical faces. Tack Coat Application The hole to be repaired should be cleaned, the subgrade compacted and leveled as needed, and a lack coal applied to the bob lom and all sides. Fill with asphalt mixture Place the recycled material against the edges first when filling the hole. A sufficient amount of material should be allowed to in- sure proper patch level after compaction. Proper compaction is needed When compacting the patch, overlap the first pass and return of the compactor no more than 6 inches (15mm); move to the opposite side and repeat. Then proceed at right angles to the compacted edges, over- lapping each pass a few inches onto the mrcompactod patch. Hot Patch Pete keeps material uni- formly hot ... even on cold winter days ... because asphalt is heated at the patch, not at a remote mix plant. Adjustable propane burner can heat mix to more than 300'F (149"C). First hot malarial from chunks is available in 6.8 minutes, depending upon chunk size and temperature. Hot mix from milled or cold -planed material is avail• able in 4.5 minutes, depending upon temperature. Fiber glass insulation encases the mixinglheating cham• bor—keeping the mix hot frorn patch to patch. AFTER: A permanent patch to handle all kinds of traffic. ROMAG the worldwide leader r] L SPECIFICATIONS: Weights 8 Dimensions Walgbt, willwul prupmla milks ................ 2I0 lbs. (953 kg) Weight. with propane Innks ................ 2SOO lbs. (1134 kill Overall width ................. ...............72' (I83 cm) Overall height .................................... 75'(191 cm) Ovurall length (Including burner) ............ . . . . ..143' (363 em) Engine Wisconsin Robin EY27W , 7 5 1IP (5.5 h" Riess @ 3600 rpm Rucommanded operating rpm ..................... 2200 rpm Fuel Capacity ................... ............. I,45 gal (5.51) Heating/Mixing Chamber Dimensions ............ 36' (91 ern) din. x 55' (140 cm) long with 19' (4cm) dia. opening Capacity .................. 3.8 tons 12721.6-7257.5 kg) per hour Drum 6 Cono Thickness .............. Rri (4.76 nIm) sleet Insulation .........................RI 1 311, (09 insist fiberglass compressed to 1' (25 mm) Mixer ....................... 8 Piles (replaceable) Mouth ............................. ....17'(43 cm) chunk food, heal into[and exhaust slack Feed Chunk form through 19' (48 cm) dia. conical drum opening. Burner Fuel......................................... Propane (vapor) Two optional systems: Prepanu (liquid) Diesel Fuel et or Kerosene Burner size ........................ 750.000 BTU, spark Ignition Skid Mounted Unit Specifications (Without propane tanks) Waighl .......................1500 lbs.(600 kill Overall witlm ................... Overall Height.....44'(112 cm� .............41: (104 cm Overall length.. .............. , ........ 111(282 cl Drive Engine —gas, singly cylinder, 4 cycle, air eootod, 6:1 reducer; had. No.to zon160 chain from lalckshaq to druclutch: twom sprocket; drumV-bolts fromich speed- 201rpm Frame 6 Towing Tongue Fabricated tubular frame and towing Ion us Hitch ...................2' (S cm) ball•type or optional ring style Wheels 8 Suspension Wheals .... ............................ anlilriclion bearing hubs i5' (3aI mm) rims wish G78.15 pnoumalic tires 11 go. lenders 3000 Its. (1361 kg) leaf springs (load capacity per pair) Heavy duty axle Standard Equipment Fenders, lights, turn signals, eutomalic electronic ignition, safety chains, lockable engine enclosurelongue lack, propane hoses and i gauges lot hook up to two tanks, omperature gauge. Options Hand hold larch (200.000 BTU) Ring Style hitch with 3' (8 cm) eye WE RESERVE THE RIGHT TO AMEND THESE SPECIFICATIONS AT ANY TIME WITHOUT NOTICE. THE ONLY WARRANTY APPLICABLE IS OUR STANDARD WRITTEN WARRANTY. WE MAKE NO OTHER WARRANTY, EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED KOEHRING CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT . XATIOXt. 0 P 4, BOX 157 DAYION, 01110 45401.0157 COE•5554•I Im,aavn4 r . i-ur qum,, permanent repair of chucic holes ravel trench openings, bell holes, and excavations. s, A COMPLETE STREET & HIGHWAY REPAIR UNIT EMPLOYING HOT OR COLD ASPHALT FOR 'ROUND YEAR USE. Specifications A!;uh.)l[ Tilfrom Lav moum T;L . niWed 11SIVIAll wogLF LLICTRICHEATI%­ISTFM ommin; 01.1,0of'of xlqmu I.., ." 11 . , I 1 SCRFWror.,F,oR I 1 11, r I , . " X 6 : It im No() Ifloullen 1:!I: 1( versing ovarale:r I. HAND TORCH.: lnijz.ufr valve THPOTI[E. (I ,I rear of tllllt fee TEMPEPATURIE CAUCE: 3 Up] t%,pe Cjoa 0 ble r, kel, start .1110 mi wjj�p,j I:f 100 fort ,,in limes. ;I'LL STORACE ASPHAILT-Ofl. PUMP: I! � lVII.Ur Losing, wijon milacity min 11TOCor for reve'si.• ale. wr.aulp.,,poed. (00ty Soar fillet) %.vltll In. flullilig Int (leaning tools I InSulff,Iq ihritlw, fetral relief Mlve, Operating Comill(lons 20 �ON: forru filing InSuoltive rovc, 5PIA �i 12CORP&I, IDO PSI COCratIng pmsure Caovvno, POINER SOURCE: 21 HYDRAULIC PU1.1p, i I y L&M, 2000 PSI ('I I L' "'I'l C.IIII a. lut Oil tank - 235 UIlIt"I'l 61)(Irilfirri pressure, van.11ge, 1pf.,d, efeu Tyne. IQ hopper' 31, ys,, Ireelfl,11 TRAltr.R"r HYDRAULIC CONTROL VALVE: Ifirpi- M: Sullmergen rotor( Illip %pool 1, P. relief valve ClIpT.1toll from v 11 [01 Just stick Stf-tv eflutrecroll FrX ay levers reeloh. id laspliall 0111 level roam (00. R.1dialon area, 4,M �n COLC: HYDRAULIC OIL RESERVOIR: 39 galltv on i;r%me in am", .IpJCI VII to bre.1t tier and sinlit (I.I[loornmolotelfrith IJ large cjpJcItV, e.,sV rearrol •Ofespo• '350.00001111furner 1, 101,1 , .1rc(ss r,I)j,IrPIu1v rJr tridgefilter 11fillell (Odin CIC01i Ifflutor, ConjUscle off an wgi (111 ternperolute P.-,T,.Crj all'. HYDRAULIC PIPING: hates LIVOralile all Illlllllitllnl 3700 MI fill,' lime fit prigsOPTIUNAI 1 100 ID feenovable belof. El't N"! It T - Llwl, ASPHALT HAND SPRAYER: 5 si Ind rogUIXOr (to PSI loll ll.inie!(! r�I;L;j g x evil � v,11mono 2 of CUSTOM MADE Wrton-, 7 INDUSTRIES, INC. Id under U S NO. 4,196rB27 THERMOoLAY"' C'• y 31, "le Thermo -Lay- Pothole Patcher is a combination treater and dispenser which heats asphalt road oils d Pre -mixed Hot or Cold asphalt aggregates to elevated temperatures for easy on -site applications. .ne llnit ran he IISed year round regardless of weather conditions. Tile Machine ran be I.ISed successfully by a one or two man crew. The one machine does the work oroinarily requiring a Dump Truck, Air Compressor, Hot Oil Tank, Roller and Sanding Unit (optional) By eliminating several pieces of equipment, It also reduces the labor and operating cost. All the material is moved into the pothole by simple hydraulic controls. All tools are powered by hydraulics v:hich slakes the job easier and also makes a fast, high quality repair. GENERAL: The Asphalt lllrrm= 1....... -Ladd 375.700 IS a unitized atplLtlt I. rapahle of m.2kytg pprn.anoh( under any weather condif lom BODY: 108" long x 78wine x .: •. .% I , Safety step side lender" rv!h r- I:', . Large tool stora'P 'I"T',•,.••• "• g011gn Slnnl rnrv.n • r ., . .. Ed scams, 36M Ili • :"LI .. I ,. BODY INSULATION: I I- r • . UndfIrslde with fntm iat ; art complete with lledo:•nl' CAPACITY: ASphall nu L»I% ... Asphalt aggregate honor - i .. HEATING SYSTEM: ruonlergcu I. -I •c , Willi eIIhaUSt StaCk. SaleV; ellgtoCCJr'd minimum 3' linuid asphalt pill level mtir laar Ed aDove retort tUhe, Radiation area, E700 sit in. Specifications ELECTRIC HEATING SYSTEM: 730 Volt, 6 RLV CICp tni IleatlOg Element Complete with tiler =Italcontrol • for l:a:nWin:= heat Our. Ing nnnm•rn::�^ notes p! mile HAND TORCH:: -'• fiTioff Wive Inn to it e, Tr LIPfRATURE CAUCE ,! ASPHALT OIL PI11a0 ❑YLIPAW IC PUfa P' .f l I1C: Ifla,l:!gQ 7 HYDRAULIC CONTROL VALVE " ASPHALT HAND SPRAYER: 5 lung r (II,1nicter Cnlmmefi tvdll rin"W:IC Yal%v Intl I?' 111 I. limp SCREW CONVEYOR: 10 lrn1n 16 cloweter s6 ll:gnts, roller and IL1ll bearing mourn and driven hit fnr.:'ard ant, 1`001SU10 hYnrAlliC motor. TRIICX SPECIFICATIONS: CC:,:I ..:wn,P ti.: Call IONIC m111 Tllt fall 90" rtfl In .ilte mill REMOTE THROTTLE.: tocx( o dt real Of Limit for engine speed control. DIESEL FUEL STORAGE: 10 gallon CapwitY With 17 VOC elrrinc pump Conner:or for fhrhinn .r.1111,11f pump Spr.ly W.Illn for [leaning 400IS mq 111.101ttle COLORS: Aspltall Therillo-laytl•I motS Conte 11111 trety Of colors Standhrd Color H Federal I' I•; lni':v Crrs:!: f.r!-'••: it roureSen. ❑r:rluanrout :•.,.a Irp,-vNl "URNER: Propane 350,I)f.O 07U hun¢r , MPS( IIC(1 UY 17 VOC Cletinunf lgnllm C'nlIIII'L HYDRAULIC OIL RISIRVOIR: fu u,eb'u r.lp.� 46 Safety shut off nn 111911on lenlol.dnrr Will]blealhcl don •anllt ga,uyr nd»pU: to. ocudnnt 1pulnE»NT .. loss Of 11.1n]e Lire 41Pdf11Y, eaty wi'Lp edble I,, Irin9c ldU•rand 0il rooter I'Alife. ,,• I-' .. :t1in" FUEL: Propane in 100 1D, removattle. bottle HYDRAULIC PIPING: Hydraulic bout all Complete with valve and regutamr Ito PSI mipintum 37W ail burs( lrrtsUR• veto .rpr.I Operating pressure l I I CUSTOM MADE OPTIONS: (i,i%it 1d¢arp Post, hhlllgs. WE RESERVE THE RIGHT TO AMEND THESE SPECIFICATIONS AT ANY TIME WITHOUT NOTICE, TIIE ONLY WARRAFITY APPLICABLE 15 OUR STANDARD WRITTEN WARRANTY. WE MARE NO OTIIER WARRANTY, rxpRf Sgrf OR IMP( IED, WHY YOU NEED A THERMO-LAyTM Savings will allow a one year Payback 1. one machine replaces and performs the work tains the heat overnice for early work sta of several pieces of equipment. next day. 2. Traffic congestion is eliminated by using only one vehicle. 3. one or two man crews cut the payroll expense. Efficient manpower utilization increases the economy of the Thermo•Lay°" Pothole Patcher. 4. Hot repairs are made winter or summer with either hot mix or cold mix materials. Thermo• LayT'" keeps it hot or makes It hot and also main• 5. ThermodayT'•1 repairs will eliminate maintenance which results in material savings. G. Simple hydraulic controls furnish the all machine functions and hydraulic t 7. Models available: TM 375.200 Truck chassis TRL 375.200 Trailer unit All these features save energy and time while providing efficiency and simplicity of operal Thermo•LayTM Pothole Patcher is a practical investment for anyone concerned with doing a first on street and highway repair. d 3m') 4 MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council \_�\ FROM: Clerk-Administratop•� DATE: November 16., 1983 II SUBJ '1': POLICG CHIEF PERFORMANCE GOALS AND SALARY Pursuant to Council direction, the issue of performance goals for the Police Chief, during his one year probationary period; have been placed on the agenda for your discussion and direction. Attached to this memorandum are First Year Goals prepared by staff as part of a memorandum to Mayor McCarty dated November 1, 1983, along with referenced attachments. Staff would request Council consideration of these goals as being the basis for the development of the performance goals you will ultimately adopt for this position. It was also noted by staff that the Council did not establish a starting salary for Police Chief Ramacher. The stated salary range for the position was $28,000 to $31,000 per year. Mr. Ramacher's salary as Police Investigator was $29,482.18 per year. Staff would recommend a starting salary of $30,500 per year, with the across: the board annual adjustment being made as of January 1, 1984. Staff —, would further recommend a $500.00 per year increase at the end of the first six months of the probationary period if Council reviews have determined that Mr. Ramacher is successfully performing as Police Chief per your expectations, as well as an additional adjust- ment to be determined at the end of the probationary period, November 14, 1984. These salary recommendations have been discussed with Chief Ramacher and he has indicated that they would be satis- factory to his expectations. . DFP/pf Attachment MEMO TO: Mayor Duane McCarty 1 �" FROM: Clerk-Administratq'r`: DATE: November 1, 1983 l SUBJECT: DRAFT POLICE cuirF FIRST YEAR GOALS In earlier discussions, you requested that I prepare a list of goals for the first year of employment for the City's new Police Chief. fur use in discussions with the City Council as part of: the hiring process. Attached to this memo please find a list of nine first year goals for the Police Chief which I personally feel reflects some of the greater needs for the department. After you have reviewed this draft list of goals, I would ask that you advise me as to whether or not you wish for this to be given to the City Council for inclusion in discussions during your Special Meeting on Thursday evening. I would further ask that you note that most of these items reflect major areas of accountability included in the position description under the City's Salary Administration and Performance Review Program, a copy of which is attached. Thus, these goals would be part of any performance.review I would perform on a Police Chief during his probationary period in the same manner these position descriptions are used in evaluating the performance of any of the City's employees on an annual basis. Your advice as to what you wish to have done with these draft goals would be appreciated. DFP/pf Attachments 1 2 1''IRST YEAR GOALS - POLICE CHIEF Move the department towards a proactive mode of law enforcement rather than reactive. a. Actively organize neighborhood watch areas and publicize the need for and benefits of that• program and Operation I.D. b. Meet with church, school and community groups to develop support for the department and crime prevention programs. Upgrade the in-service training program to provide adequate training and ensure the physical and mental health of the officers. a. Require physical and psychiatric evaluations prior to relicensing and employment. 3. Become more actively involved in the labor relations aspects of the department including participation in contract negotiations. 9. Reinstate the City's Safety Committee and actively participate in the preparation of safety programs. 5. Assume the duties of Civil Defense Director and undertake efforts tc improve the City's Civil Defense activities including, but not limited to, upgrading of the City's warning system, I development of training programs for staff, and dissemination i of material to the public regarding disaster preparedness. G. Evaluate present scheduling, patrol practices, and organizational structure with outlook towards improving the level of service provided to the community at the most reasonable cost possible. 7. Develop and implement measures necessary to improve the security of the department, records and evidence. 8. Develop program for improving the methods for records storage and management including an evaluation of microprocessing and microfilming. 9. In coordination with the Civil Service Commission, update the department's operating rules and regulations, including the coordination of non -union position descriptions with that contained in the City's Salary Administration and Performance Review Program. POSITION ACCOUNTA13ILITY WRITE-111) (Mounds View) Position Tito Pol.i.c. Ch.trf Dalc August, 1900 Do artment Police Adminisl:raL•ion AccounLabl.e To Clerk Administrator Primarhjcctivc of POsiHOU To provide effective leadership in the planning, development, implementa- tion and evaluation of a comprehensive, fair and impartial law- . enforcement program which will continually command the respect and confidence of Mounds View citizens Major Areas of Accountability Implements a program of law -enforcement and public service which will engender the respect and confidence of citizens, preserve law and order and protect life and property --- Clearly defines and interprets department rules, regulations and operating policies for all assigned personnel to ensure consistent understanding and compliance with such policies throughout- the departmm t Delegates responsibility and commensurate authority to department yl officers in a manner which will remove uncertainty about their assigned accountz.bilities and the level of performance expected conducts routine tours and inspections of police beat to keep abreast of developments in the City and evaluate the performance of assigned officers Plans and directs an in-service training program designed to maintain officers' awareness of changes in laws and individual rights in order to ensure fairness and impartiality in carrying out law- eni'orcr-r..r_:It activities Personally performs police -work activities on a regular basis and provides direct assistance in special investigations or when cir- cumstances dictate Develops and iinplcaiunts various crime -prevention programs in a manner which will build community support and understanding of the need for such rctiy,ities --- Continually tu,.rlyzes crime patterns throughout the City as the bz:,_s for planning a prevention program with good chance for implementation and success Prepare; and submits a sound and documented budget for the department and controls expenditures within approved budgetary limitations PrtPored s:y 11mowed by Approved by it 2 3 Cl 5 6 Stanton Associates Compiles and submits regular reports to the City Council and makes 8 personal presentations at meetings to provide an accurate picture of law -enforcement and public-service activi.Lies being provided by the Department Maintains ongoing contact with ul:her police departments in surrounding jurisdictions as well as metropolitan professional police organiza- tions to keep abreast of new training procedures which will have application in Mounds View --- Keeps up to data with current developments in the field of po- lice administration through a program of reading, attending seminars and other activities as appropriate Serves as Civil Defense Director and develops a civil -defense disaster 10 plan for the City and files completed plans with the appropriate state agency Serves as Chairperson of the City Safety Committee in meeting:: to de- 11 termine the final disposition of action to be taken in the case of personal injury or property damage involving City personnel and/or City vehicles Itecogn.izes and accepts opportunities to address various civic groups 13 on important aspects of police work in order to broaden understand- ing and cooperation throughout the community Assumes other responsibilities as apparent or as delegated lei other Performance Measurements --- Established ptogrdms for law enforcement and public service are achieved and implemented Opportunities are taken to promote a favorable image of the depart- B ment and create good public relations through civic groups and other presentations in the community --- Provided services consistently command the confidence and respect C of the community Responsibility for work of Others Direct supervision over --- Police Sergeants Police Investigator Police corporals Patrol Officers Department Secretary Department Clerk Typist 6-vn 16 �11 0`� I I � �� , i VOP09 u � AAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA :40111101IN'AY 10 MOUNDS V I F.YI, MINN. SS 117 70&3OS5 November 8, 1983 Ms. Debra Yost 8205 Groveland Road Minneapolis, Minnesota 55432 Mr. Rol Gale 8227 Groveland Road Minneapolis, Minnesota 55432 Dear Ms. Yost and Mr. Gale: The Mounds View City Council recently received a letter from Mr. and Mrs. James Bremer, dated October 17, 1983, requesting that the City Council consider the vacation of the Cairchild Avenue right-of-way lying between the easterly herder of your property and Mr. Bremer's westerly property line. You may recall that the City Council previously considered vacation of this right-of-way and has communicated with you on several occasions regarding your intentions with respect to development of the rear halves of your lets. Having received no response from you to our earlier correspondence, the Council has requested that this item be placed on the agenda for their November 21, 1983 meeting at 7:00 p.m., at which time they would request your presence to discuss with them your inten- tions for the development of your property which has been the main reason for their not vacating this right-of-o-ray in the past. Your attendance at this meeting would be appreciated. Sincerely, CIT�C)F\MOUNDS V . rauiey ninistra DCP/pf• 0 Cif of VORE 4 It AIASEV COII NT Y. M IN NE SOT 240111161MAV 10 A MOuNOS VIEW,lINt1 55I12 IIIA•.1055 November ©, 19133 Mr. and Mrs. James Bremer 2..765 Laport Drive 55432 Minneapolis, Minnesota Dear Mr. and Mrs. Bremer: As I indicated to you during the Mounds View City Council agenda session on Monday, November 7th, the City Council has scheduled further discussion of your request for the vacation of the I'aerty for 30 p.m. oneNovembert21, 1983. T1ewest Councilyour has directed staff 7:00 1 to invite Ms, Debra Yost and Mr. Roy Gale heorcershalvesnof their discuss their intentions for dcvelouPipresence at this meeting to property and would also request y discuss your concerns with respect to the problems you are experiencing along the right-of-way. Your attendance at the meeting would be greatly appreciated. sincerely, DFP/pf ct6/rn -7 MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Clerk -Administrator DATE: November 16, 1983 SUBJECT: CIVIL DEFENSE MUTUAL AID AGREEMENT As has previously been mentioned in Administrative Newsletters, several municipalities in Ramsey County have joined forces to form an informal organization of their Civil Defense Directors to join efforts in developing a Mutual Aid Agreement for Civil Defense emergencies and improve capabilities for responding to such emer- gencies. Attached to this memorandum please find an agreement developed by a Subcommittee, Chaired by myself, which has been approved by the overall organization for presentation to the municipalities referred to in the first paragraph of the agreement. This agreement has been reviewed by the City Attorney and our City insurance agent,and it has been determined that the agreement meets all legal requirements and would not jeopardize the City's liability insurance coverage. RECOMMENDATION: Staff would recommend Council authorization of the Mayor and Clerk -Administrator to enter into this Mutual Aid Agreement, with the referenced municipalities, for assistance during natural or man-made disasters or other Civil Defense emergencies. DFP/pf Attachment AGREEMENT WHEIREAS, it is the desire of the following munItIp,nIItlof; of Ramsey ~'tin ty: White (tear Lnku, Vadnais Ile ights, Shoreview, Roseville, North .. Paul, New iirightan, Mounds View, Maplewood, Little Canada, Falcon Ileights, Arden lulls, and Gem Lake to be prepared to deal adequately with natural or man-made disasters and other Civil Defense emergencies occurring within the boundaries of said municipalities; and WHEREAS, in order to Insure that such preparations be adequate to protect the lives and property of the residents of said municipalities, it is hereby found and declared to he necessary that said municipalities agree to furnish assistance to each other in the event of an emergency. NOW, THEREFORE, the municipalities of Ramsey County hereby agree to furnish assistance td each other upon the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, as follows: 1. Whenever the public interest requires it as a result of a natural disaster or other Civil Defense emergency occurring within the boundaries of any of the said municipalities, the Civil Defense/Emergency Services Director of the municipality, or his designee, hereinafter called the receiving municipality, may, in his discretion, call upon the other municipalities, hereinafter called the sending municipality, to furnish equip- ment, personnel, and supplies of the sending municipality to provide assistance to the receiving municipality. 2. Upon the request of the receiving municipality, the Civil Defense/Emergency Services Director of the sending munici- pality, or his designee, shall authorize and direct such personnel, equipment, and supplies as, in his discretion, are available to go to the assistance of the receiving municipa- lity. 3. The sending municipality reserves the right to retain for its own use such equipment, personnel, and supplies as, in the discretion of its Civil Defense/Emergency Services Director, or his designee, may be necessary for the proper and adequate protection of the sending municipality, and the Civil Defense/ Emergency Services Director of the sending municipality, or his designee, shall authorize and direct to the receiving munici- pality only such equipment, personnel, and supplies as can, in his discretion, be safely spared from the sending municipality, and in case of an emergency arising within the sending muni- cipality while the equipment, personnel, and supplies of that municipality are engaged in the receiving municipality, the Civil Defense/Emergency Services Director of the sending municipality, or his designee, may, in his discretion, recall to the sending municipality such equipment•, personnel, and supplies as he may consider necessary to meet such emergency. 4. While engaged in the receiving municipality, the personnel of the sending municipality shall be under the control and direc- tion of the receiving municipality, but shall be paid by the sending municipality the same as if performing their regular duties within the sending municipality. -z- 5. The sending municipality shall be responsible for Its own personnel, equipment, ar.d supplies, and the receiving muni- cfpaliLy shall not be held llnble for any injuries to personne)--, or damage to equipment of the sending municipality, nor shall the receiving municipnlil}' be required to reimburse the sendin,, man icIpit lfty for supplies used or the cost of personnel and equipmenL while'so engaged, except that any monies received by the receiving municipality from other nonparticipating agen- cies to reimburse the cost of such personnel, equipment, and supplies shall be remitted to the sending municipality in an amount equivalent to the pe.rrrntagn of total cost reflected by the monies received, along with any equipment and supplies unused upon the termtnation of the emergency. Supplies furnished or drawn from pool sources shall he replaced or reimbursed for by the receiving municipality. 6. The sending municipality shall not be responsible for any Injuries, losses, or damage to persons or property arising out of the act of any of the personnel of the sending or receiving municipalities. 1. In case weather, road conditions, or other circumstances are such that, in the discretion of the Civil Defense/Emergency Services Director of the sending municipality, or his designee, equipment, personnel, and supplies cannot be furnished to the receiving municipality with reasonable safety he may, in his discretion, refuse to authorize and direct assistance to the receiving municipality. The determination of the Civil I Defense/Emergency Services Director of the sending munici- pality, or his designee, as to what assistance as provided herein shall be sent to the receiving municipality, shall be final and conclusive, and shall give rise to no liability on the part of the sending municipality for failure to furnish such assistance. This agreement shall be effective only during periods when a Civil Defense emergency is in effect and duly declared pursuant to local ordi- nance., state or federal law. This agreement may be executed in several counterparts and also executed shall constitute one (1) agreement, binding on all of the parties hereto notwithstanding that all of the parties are not signatory to the original of the same counterpart. This agreement shall be effective after its approval and execution by the parties endorsing this agreement and shall continue in effect thereafter until and unless it is amended by the parties to this agreement or cancelled by any party upon written notice to all other parties. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said municipalities have crused this agree- ment to be signed in their respective corporate names by the respective duly authorized officers by authority of their respective governing bodies as of this day of lq Mayor Clerk -Administrator Mounds View Mounds View dizm) QA- MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council Clerk -Administrator FROM: Engineering/Planning Technician Kampel DATE: November 17, 1983 SUBJECT: SILVER LAKE WOODS REAPPORTIONMENT R The 8-unit manor home in the Silver Lake Woods project is about to be sold as individual condominium units. The County has requested a reapportionment of assessments for this property. Attached please find for your adoption Resolution No. 1683, which reapportions the assessments for the lots in question. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution No. 1683. FJK/pf Attachment RESOLUTION N 1 L H 3 EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW HELD ON Change in: Auditor's No. 431 Motion by: WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution of the City Council of Mounds View, adopted , the Special Assessments for the Construction of Auditor's No. 431 were levied against the attached list of described properties, said list made a part heroin: And WHEREAS, The above mentioned properties have been conveyed or replatted and are described according to the attached list, and said list made a part herein: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY 711E CITY COUNCIL of Mounds View, that the assessments for Auditor's No. 431 against the heretofore mentioned properties be correctly certified to the Auditor of Ramsey County for further - collection in the amount stated on the attached list, said list made a part herein. Seconded by COUNTY OF RAMSEY CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW Ayes I, the undersigned being the duly qualified City Clerk of said City DO HEREBY CERTIFY That I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of Minutes of a meeting of the City Council of satd City held on 19_ at M. with the original thereof on file in my office, and the same is a full, true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates -to the changing of the assessments for Auditor's No. 431 because of the conveyance ufjor replaLiitig Of certain properties. 19 (SEAL) WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of Clerk, City of Mounds View Resolution Number: 1683 (late: Division Number: 58304 Name or Assessment: Sanitary Sewer Improvement Auditor's Number: 431 Data Processing Number: 47 Original Assessment (A) Parcel 59-65000-100-07 Silver Lake Woods Area 52,415 $ 819.12 Lot 10, Block 7 M 6 E Realty Company Total Imp. $ 819.12 TOTAL ORIGINAL ASSLSSMIXT $ 819.12 Apportionment (1) Parcel 59-65000-101-13 Silver Lake Woods Area 4,863 $ 76.01 Condominium No. 215, Unit 1 Marvin Anderson Constr. Co. Total Imp. $ 76.01 (2) Parcel 59-65000-102-13 Silver Lake Woods Area 4,498 $ 70.29 Condominium No. 215, Unit 2 Marvin Anderson Constr. Co. Total Imp. $ 70.29 (3) Parcel 59-65000-103-13 Silver Lake Woods Area 4,092 $ 63.95 Condominium No. 215, Unit 3 Marvin Anderson Constr. Co. Total Imp. $ 63.95 (4) Parcel 59-65000-104-13 Silver Lake Woods Area 4,461 $ 69.71 Condominium No. 215, Unit 4 Marvin Anderson Constr. Co. Total Imp. $ 69.71 (5) Parcel 59-65000-105-13 Silver Lake Woods Area 3,591 $ 56.12 Condominium No. 215, Unit 5 Marvin Anderson Constr, Co. Totai Imp. $ 56.12 1 Itesolution Number: 1633 Date: Division ,Number: 5S30,I Name of Assessment: Sanitary Sower Improvement r-. Auditor's Number: 431 Data Processing Number: 47 (6) Parcel 59-65000-loll-l.i Silver Lako Woods Area 3,428 $ 5337 Condominium No. 215, Unit 6 Marvin Anderson Constr. Co. Total Imp. $ S3.57 (7) Parcel 59-65000-107-13 Silver Lake Wools Area 3,215 $ 50.24 Condominium No. 215, Unit 7 Marvin Anderson Constr. Co. Total Imp. $ 50.24 (S) Parcel 59-65000-108-13 Silver Lake Woods Area 3,391 $ S2.99 Condominium No. 215, Unit 8 Marvin Anderson Constr. Co. Total Imp. $ S2.99 (9) Parcel 59-65000-109-13 Silver Lake Woods Area 2,S27 $ 44.17 Condominium No. 215, Unit G1 Marvin Anderson Constr. Co. Total Imp. $ 44.17 (10) Parcel 59-65000-110-13 Silver Lake Woods Area 2,537 $ 39.65 Condominium No. 215, Unit G2 Marvin Anderson Constr. Co. Total Imp. $ 3915 (11) Parcel 59-65000-111-13 Silver Lake Woods Area 2,537 $ 39.65 Condominium No. 215, Unit G3 Marvin Anderson Constr. Co. Total Imp. $ 39.65 (12) Parcel 59-65000-112-13 Silver Lake Woods Area 2,537 $ 39.65 Condominium No. 215, Unit G4 Marvin Anderson Constr. Co. Total Imp. $ S1 65 Resolution Number: 16S3 Oato: Division Number: 58.304 None of' Assessment: Sanitary Sauer fmprovement Auditor's Number: 431 Data Processing Number: 47 • (13) Parcel 59-65000-113-13 Silver Lake floods Area 2,537 $ 39.65 Condominium No. 215, Unit GS Marvin Anderson Constr. Co. Total Imp. $ 39.65 (14) Parcel 59-65000-114-13 Silver lake Woods Arca 2,537 $ 39.65 Condominium No. 215, Unit G6 Marvin Anderson Constr. Co. Total Imp. $ 39.65 (15) Parcel 59-65000-115.13 Silver Lake Woods Area 2,537 $ 39.65 Condominium No. 215, Unit G7 Marvin Anderson Constr. Co. Total Imp. $ 39.65 (16) Parcel 59-65000-116-13 Silver Lake Woods Area 2,827 $ 44.17 Condominium No. 215, Unit G8 Marvin Anderson Constr. Co. Total Imp. $ 44.17 TOTAL APPORTIONED ASSESSMENT $ 819.12 11 RESOLUTION A 1633 EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW HELD ON Change in: Auditor's No. 5336 Motion by: WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution of the City Council of Mounds View, adopted the Special Assessments for the Construction of Auditor's No. 5336 were levied against the attached list of described properties, said list made a part herein: And WHEREAS, The above mentioned properties havo been conveyed or replatted and are described according to the attached list, and said list made a part herein: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of Mounds View, that the assessments for Auditor's No. 5336 aga_not the heretofore mentioned proporties be correctly certified to the Auditor of Ramsey County for further' collection in the amount stated on the attached list, said list made a part herein. Seconded by COUNTY OF RAMSEY CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW Ayes I, the undersigned being the duly qualified City Clerk of said City DO HEREBY CERTIFY That I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of Minutes of a meeting of the City Council of sadd City held on 19 at �'.M. with the original thereof on file in my office, and the same is a full, true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates -to the changing of the assessments for Auditor's No. 5336 because of tho conveyance of/or replatting of certain properties. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of 19 Clerk, City of Mounds View (SEAL) Resolution Number: 16S3 Date: Division Number: 58304 Name of Assessment: Silver Lake Woods 81-3 Auditor's Number: 5336 Data Processing Number: 5336 n original Assessment r (A) Parcel 59-65000-100-07 Silver Lake Woods Area 52,415 $33,265.15 Lot 10, Block 7 M F, U Realty Company Total Imp. $33,265.15 TOTAL ORIGINAL ASSESSMENT $33,265.15 Apportionment (1) Parcel 59-65000-101-13 $ 3,086.93 Silver Lake Woods Area 4,S63 Condominium No. 215, Unit 1 Marvin Anderson Constr. Co. I'oWl Imp. $ 3,086.93 (2) Parcel 59-65000-102-13 Area 4,498 $ -' S54.G5 Silver Lake Woods Condominium No. 215, Unit 2 Marvin Anderson Constr. Co. 'Total Imp. $ 2,854.65 (3) Parcel 59-65000-103-13 Area 4,092 $ 2,596.98 Silver Lake Woods Condominium No. 215, Unit 3 Marvin Anderson Constr. Co. '1•otal Imp. $ 2,596.98 (4) Parcel 59-65000-104-13 4,461 $ 2,831.17 Silver Lake Woods Area Condominium No. 215, Unit 4 Marvin Anderson Constr. Co. Total Imp. $ 2,831.17 (5) Parcel 59-65000-105-13 3,591 $ 2,279.02 Silver Lake Woods Area Condominium No. 215, Unit 5 Marvin Anderson Constr. Co. Total Imp. $ 2,279.02 I Resolution Number: 1083 Date: Dieision Number: 58:i0•I Name of Assessment: Silver Lake Roods 81-:i AudiLor's Number: 5.336 Data Processing Number: 5336 (6) Parcel S9-6S000-1U603 Silver Lake Woods Area 3,428 Condominium No. 215, Unit 6 $ 2,175.aR Marvin Anderson Constr. Co. Total Imp. $ 2,175.58 (7) Parcel 59-65000-107-13 Silver Lake Woods Area 3,215 $ 2,040.40 Condominium No. 215, Unit 7 Marvin Anderson Constr. Co. Total Imp. $ 2,040.40 (8) Parcel 59-65000-103-13 Silver Lake Woods Condominium No. 215, Unit 8 Area 3,391 $-,152.09 Marvin Anderson Constr. Co. Total Imp. $ 2,152.09 (9) Parcel 59-65000-109-13 Silver Lake Woods `_. Condominium No. 215, Unit G1 Area 2,S27 $ 1,794.15 Marvin Anderson Constr. Co. Total Imp. $ 1,794.15 (10) Parcel 59-65000-110-13 Silver Lake Woods Condominium No, 215, Unit G2 Area 2,537 $ 1,G10.11 Marvin Anderson Constr. Co. Total Imp. $ 1,610.11 (11) Parcel 59-65000-111-13 Silver Lake Woods Area 2,537 S 1,610.11 Condominium No. 215, Unit G3 Marvin Anderson Constr. Co. Total Imp. $ 1,610.11 (12) Parcel 59-65000-112-13 Silver Lake Woods Area 2,537 Condominium No. 215, Unit G4 $ 1, lU.11 Marvin Anderson Constr. Co. Total Imp. $ 1,610.11 Resolution Number: 168.3 (late: Division Number: 58.104 Name of Assessment: Silver Lake Woods 81-3 ^ Auditor's Number: 5336 Data Processing Number: 5336 (13) Parcel 59-65000-113-13 Silver lake Woods Area 2,537 > 1,610.11 Condominium No. 215, Unit G5 Marvin Anderson Constr. Co. Total Imp. $ 1,610.11 (14) Parcel 59-65000-114-13 1,G10.11 Silver Lake Woods Area 2,537 Condominium No. 215, Unit G6 Marvin Anderson Constr. Co. Total Imp. $ 1,610.11 (15) Parcel 59-65000-115-13 Area 2,537 $ 1,610.11 Silver Lake Woods Condominium No. 215, Unit G7 Marvin Anderson Constr. Co. Total Imp. $ 1,610.11 (16) Parcel 59-65000-116-13 2,827 $ 1 793,52 Silver Lake Woods Area Condominium No. 215, Unit G8 Marvin Anderson Constr. Co. Total Imp. $ 1,793.52 TOTAL APPORTIONED ASSESSMENT $33,265.15 Hamm q6 -�, MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council Clerk -Administrator FROM: Engineering/Planning Technician F)� DATE: November 17, 1983 SUBJECT: PROGRAMMED LAND REAPPORTIONMENT Attached please find Resolution No. 1685 which reapportions the assessments for the subdivision created on Programmed Land First Addition property (motel site) for your adoption. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution No. 1685. FJK/pf Attachments RESOLUTION N 1685 EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW HELD ON Change in: Auditor's No. 1005 Motion by: WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution of the City Council of Mounds View, adopted , the Special Assessments for the Construction of Auditor's No �` were levied against the attached list of described properties, said list made a part herein: And WHEREAS, The oboes_ mentioned properties have been conveyed or replatted and are described according to the attached list, and said list made a part herein: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of Mounds View, that the assessments for Auditor's No. inn; against the heretofore mentioned properties be correctly certified to the Auditor of Ramsey County for further collection in the amount stated on the attached list, said list made a part herein. Seconded by COUNTY OF RAMSEY CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW Ayes I, the undersigned being the duly qualified City Clerk of said City DO HEREBY CERTIFY That I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of Minutes of a meeting of the City Council of said City held on 19 at M. with the original thereof on file in my office, and the same is a full, true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates -to the changing of the assessments for Auditor's No.1005 because of the conveyance of./or replatting of certain properties. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of 19 Clerk, City of Mounds View (SEAL) n Resolution Number: 1685 Date: Division Number: 58302 Name of Assessment: Sanitary Sewer & Water Improvement-1969-4 Auditors Number: 1005 Date Processing Number: 85 Original Assessment Assessments Abated (A) Parcel 59-59500-020-03 Swr, Ftg. 284.92 3538..70 Programmed Land 1st Addition Str. Ftg. 284.92 1384.72 Lot 2, Block 3 Area Carew Properties Inc. Swr. Sery 295.21 Total Swr. Imp. $ 5218.63 TOTAL ORIGINAL ASSESSMENT $ 5218.63 Apportionment (1) Parcel 59-59510-010-01 Swr. FLg. 53.19 $ 660.62 Programmed Land 2nd Addition Str. Ftg. 53.19 258.51 Lot 1, Block 1 Area Carew Properties Inc. Swr. Sery None Total Imp. $ 919.13 (2) Parcel 59-59510-020-01 Swr. Ftg. 231.73 $ 2878.08 Programmed Land 2nd Addition Str. Ftg. 231.13 1126.21 Lot 2, Block 1 Area Carew Properties Inc. Swr Sery 295.21 Total Swr. Imp. $ 4299.50 TOTAL APPORTIONED ASSESSMENT $ 5218.63 n RESOLUTION H 1685 EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW HELD ON Change in: Auditor's No. 1408 Motion by: WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution of the City Council of Mounds View, adopted , the Special Assessments for the Construction of Auditor's N—o�8 , were levied against the attached list of described properties, said list made a part herein: And WHEREAS, The above mentioned properties have been conveyed or replatted and are described according to the attached list, and said list made a part herein: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of Mounds View, that the assessments for Auditor's No. 1408 against the heretofore mentioned properties be correctly certified to the Auditor of Ramsey County for further collection in the amount stated on the attached list, said list made a part herein. Seconded by COUNTY OF RAMSEY CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW Ayes 1, the undersigned being the duly qualified City Clerk of said City DO HEREBY CERTIFY That I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of Minutes of a meeting of i:he City Council of said City held on 19 at M. with the original thereof on file in my office, and the same is a full, true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relatf-s•to the changing of the assessments for Auditor's No. 1408 because of the conveyance of/or replatting of certain properties. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of 19 Clerk, City of Mounds View (SEAL) Resolution Number: 1685 Da to: Division Number: 58302 ' Name of Assessment: Street Improvement 1973-6 Auditors Number: 1408 Data Processing Number 98 Original Assessment Assessments (A) Parcel 59-59500-020-03 Wtr. Ftg. 284.92 Abated 2998.78 Programmmed Land 1st Addition Stm. Swr. 284.92 1984.47 Lot 2, Block 3 Str. Const. 284.92 5085.82 Carew Properties, Inc. Total Imp. $10,069.07 TOTAL ORIGINAL ASSESSMENT $10,069.07 Apportionment (1) Parcel 59-59510-010-01 Wtr. Ftg. 53.19 $ 559.82 Programmed Land 2nd Addition Stm. Swr. 53.19 370.47 Lot 1, Block 1 Str. Const. 53.19 949.44 Carew Properties, Inc. Total Imp. $ 1,879.73 (2) Parcel 59-59510-020-01 Wtr. Ftg. 231.73 $ 2,438.96 Programmmed Land 2nd Addition Stm. Swr. 231.73 1,614.00 Lot 2, Block 1 Str. Const. 231.73 4,136.38 Carew Properties, Inc. Total Imp. $ 8,189.34 TOTAL APPORTIONED ASSESSMENT $10,069.07 d ebro 0 MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council �• FROM: Clerk -Ad ministratp� DATE: November 16, 1983 v SUOJECT: STREETLIGHT REQUEST Attached please find a memorandum from Engineering/Planning Technician Kampel regarding a request from the Mounds View School District for the installation of a streetlight at the intersection of County Road H and the Edgewood Community Center parking lot entrance off of County Road H. As Mr. Kampel indicates, this petition complies with all the require- ments of Resolution Nos. 1069 and 1354. It is further indicated that it might be appropriate for the City Council to consider the effect that this request may have on other requests to install lights at the intersections of parking lots and roads. In consideration of the fact that in those cases streetlights would be appropriate as a matter of safety, staff finds the approval of this installation advisable. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Council authorize the installa- tion of a streetlight at the intersection of County Road H and the access road to the Edgewood Conununity Center parking lot off of County Road H. DFP/pf Attachment MEMO TO: Clerk -Administrator Pauley FROM: Engineering/Planning Technician Kampel DATE: November 7,.1983 SUBJECT: STREETLIGHT REQUEST Attached please find a request from the Mounds View School District for the installation of a streetlight at the intersection of County Road II and the Edgewood Community Center parking lot off County Road If. I have contacted the Ramsey County Department of Public Works and they advised me that the City should follow the same procedures for the installation of streetlights on County roads as it does on City streets. Using this, the request meets the criteria as established by Resolution Nos. 1069 and 1354. Since the School District (north side of County Road H) and the County (south side of County Road H) are the only property owners, the request does include the adequate number of requesters. The proposed location does fall within an excessively long block and a so-called intersection (the intersection of a parking area and County Road If). The nearest streetlight is at the corner of Edgewood Drive and County Road H, approximately 600 feet away. The Council should consider the effect this request may have on other requests, if any, to install lights at inLersections of parking lots and roads. This stretch of road is quite long so a light along it may be beneficial from a safety standpoint. The next nearest lights are at the Pettibone driveway entrance and the Horse and Rider driveway entrance. Please advise if you need any additional information. PJK/pf Attachment f \ � fl Independent School District No. 621 1 I -0) 1f Mounds View Public Schools S 2959North HamllneAvenue#St. Paul, Minnesota 055113$Phone)612)636.3650 1(v Dr. Burton M. Nygren, Superintendent November 3, 1983 „r;,; 2 3!'�>• is IVOV 1983 To: City of Mounds View ^ RECEIV�p c/o Frank Campbel Engineering Technician OF,n Front: John Ostlund OIIND Coordinator Of ite Management Re: Request for street light I am happy to inform you that as of November 2, 1983 Edgewood Community Center has added 82 parking spaces on the southeast side of the building. This was accomplished by the addition of a roadway from the south parking area on County Road H. This memo is to request the City's assistance in installing a street light at the intersection of County Road H and the south parking area roadway. The reasons for this request are: 1) primarily to enhance safety on County Road H. Finding this roadway in the dark is difficult. Vehicle traffic must drive excessively slow or stop abruptly on County Road H to identify this location in the dark. 2) secondly, the lighting in this area would give a security benefit to the south parking area (two security lights have already been installed to cover the new parking area). Attached is a print of the parking lot and roadway. The area where a light is requested is marked. Your earliest attention to this is appreciated. If any additional information is required, please contact Paul Donley or me. Thank you. /dw enc. Serving the communities of Arden Hills • Mounds View 00 New Brighton a North Oaks • Roseville a Shoreview • Vadnals Heights, Equal Opportunity for Education and Employment 'y 151111111 •l o'!rt y� ZO' 116.7' fo' I �e 71n:ia 82 STALLS 11111111Llob �.. ` •• GiU7Hfa � •ALGF/!! GKIV� 24 STALLS } / LOT C cikArl I I MEMU TO. Clerk-AdminisLrator and City Council FROM: Building Inspector DATE: November 17, 1983 SUBJECT: COMPLETION OF MERMAID ADDITION AND RELEASE•' OF DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 83-56 The Mermaid Supper Club is near completion of the addition approved by Development Agreement No. 83-56 and will be completed by your next regular meeting. Should you have any considerations regarding the completion or the development agreement, please contact me. Unless otherwise directed, staff will prepare a resolution of i approval and release of securities for you at your November 28, 1983 regular meeting. RECOMMENDATION: Direct staff to prepare resolution of approval unless there are other considerations. SAR/bc MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council / FROM: Clerk -Administrator DATE: November 17, 1983 SUBJECT: NOVEMBER 11, 1983 LETTER FROM MICHAEL L. HADTRATH On November 15, 1983 Councilmember Blanchard approached Finance Director Brager and myself regarding the referenced letter from Mr. Michael L. Hadtrath addressed to Mayor McCarty, dated November 11, 1963, making various assertions and accusations regarding the City's hiring of Corporate Risk Management to assist the City in evaluating our current insurance coverage and determining if such coverage is appropriate or changes can be made to improve coverage, as well as reviewing the City's operations to determine if various risk management efforts can be undertaken to reduce our insurance ratings. Mr. Brager and I feel that although Mr. Hadtrath has not addressed a copy of this letter to either of us, he has made assertions and accusations which we feel obligated to respond to in order that you might fully understand staff rationale for recommending the hiring of Corporate Risk Management or any risk management agency. We would like to respond to Mr. Hadtrath's statements made in his November 11, 1983 letter as follows: Mr. Hadtrath states that Transcontinental Brokers, Inc., of which he is a Vice President, offers risk management services at no cost. At no time in the three plus years the City has had Mr. Hadtrath as an insurance agent has an indication or offer of such services been provided. Also, since Transcon- tinental Brokers is the City's insurance agent, earning their income by means of a percentage of our insurance premiums, there would be a conflict of interest in their providing risk management services intended to reduce the City's insurance coverage and premiums. Mr. Hadtrath states that our current insurance company, Home Insurance, provides safety and engineering specialists, as well as building appraisals at no charge. As was stated under Item No. 1, at no time has the City of Mounds View been made aware of or offered these services except in the area of building appraisals. Also, it has been my past experience that building appraisals have been limited to an evaluation of the value of the structure and does not include an appraisal of the building's equipment or contents. Also, these appraisals are not provided in writing which would make it extremely difficult to use this information in a court of law should there ever be a dispute between the City and the insurance company mgarding the value of a structure after a loss. -2- 3. Mr. Hadtrath indicates that the City's coverage is wr ;ten , very competitively, providing extremely broad comprehensive coverages. Staff will acknowledge that the City's insurance premiums have, over the past several years, reduced signifi- cantly but• would attribute this more to the insurance market and the fact that nearly all insurance companies have been able to reduce their premiums as a result of the improved interest• rates in the money market rather than any efforts on the part of staff or Transcontinental Brokers to modify our coverage, in fact, any changes made to the City's coverage have been in the manner of additions rather than subtractions. Also, although having extremely broad comprehensive coverage insures the City that we are very well protected, staff questions whether such broad and comprehensive coverage is necessary while maintaining a high level of risk protection. 4. Staff felt it was necessary to recommend to the City Council that a risk management firm be hired not only to review our current coverages and advise us whether or not they are necessary, but also to provide us with various risk management assistance and assist in the preparation of bid specifications and evaluation of insurance bids. Mr. Hadtrath asserts that as the City's insurance agent it is his job to explain coverages to us which is correct, however, Mr. Hadtrath does have a direct conflict of interest when we are requesting such an explanation in order to provide the best coverage possible at the least possible cost Mr. Hadtrath further states in his letter that he finds it hard to believe for the City to expend $3,200.00 for this service when we are having volunteers assist in our winter skating program and raise funds for neighborhood parks. Mr. Hadtrath specifically refers to the Groveland Park Association which provides rink maintenance and warming house supervision at the Groveland Park skating rinks, using local residents, with the City dedicating the monies the City would have expended for such efforts to the improvement of Groveland Park. Although the efforts of the Groveland Park Association and residents of the area are extremely admirable, we wish to emphasize to the Council that Mr. Hadtrath's efforts in this area are being done as part of a voluntary group and the City at no time has said that we would discontinue the operation of the war, ing house or skating rinks due to lack of municipal funds. Also, it sl.^uld be pointed out that many of the groups that we contacted througho,t the state regarding their success with risk management programs ad.-ised us that they were able to reduce their insurance premium costs equal to or greater than the amount of monies they were expending for such risk management services. -3- Finally, staff would like to point out that we have been advised by a knowledgeable source in the risk management field that it is the standard practice of almost all insurance agents, including Trans- continental Brokers, to object to the hiring of a risk management consultant by one of their clients in the manner done so by Mr. Hadtrath. In fact, this individual was able to tell us nearly word for word what Mr. Iadtrath's objections were without his ever having seen our letter. Attached to this memorandum is a letter staff proposes to have the Mayor send to Mr. Hadtrath at Transcontinental Brokers advising him that it is the City's intent to put the City's insurance coverage out for open bid at the time such coverage comes up for renewal and request their full and complete cooperation with Corporate Risk Management, Inc. in obtaining competitive insurance quotations. We feel that this would insure that the best interests of the City of Mounds View are being served. Staff would wish to emphasize at this time that it is not our desire to get into a name calling contest or anything similar to it with Mr. Hadtrath and that the major reason for our recommendation to the Council for the hiring of a risk management agent was to bring in an unbiased, disinterested third party to review the City's insurance coverages and risk efforts, and assist the City in making whatever modifications would be necessary to modify our coverage in such a manner that it would provide us with all the protection necessary but do so at the lowest possible cost. If through the proposed open bidding process, which will occur in the Spring of 1984, Mr. Hadtrath's firm is able to provide such coverage at the lowest possible cost, his firm would more than likely continue to be the City's insurance agent, however, there are numerous agents in the Metropolitan area providing insurance coverage to municipalities and we should be able to look at all of these agencies to determine whether or not they are capable of providing us with the coverage we desire at the lowest possible cost and with an adequate level of service to our account. DFP/pf Attachment CIfU 0f VOUH S (ew V OAMSFY COUNTY MINNESOTA ;401 IOGII'NAY 10 MOUN00 VIIW. MINN 5511' Itl43055 November 17, 1983 Mr. Michael L. Hadtrath Transcontinental Brokers, Inc. Plymouth Building Minneapolis, MN 55402 Dear Mr. Hadtrath: As you know, the City of Mounds View has contracted with Corporate Risk Managers, Inc. for insurance and risk management services. Please be advised that it is the intent of the City of Mounds View to have Corporate Risk Managers, Inc. assist the City in the writing of insurance specifications, and to negotiate the place- ment- of our insurance policies upon their renewal dates. In order to facilitate this the City requests that your firm cooperate fully with representatives of Corporate Risk Managers, In1. Sincerely, CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW Duane W. McCarty Mayor DWM/pf cc: Mr. Brian G. Colway Corporate Risk Managers, Inc. 11 DATE APPROV1iU: 11/14/83 PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA Regular Meeting October 24, 1983 Mounds view City Hall 2401 Hwy. 10, ------------------------------------------------------------ Mounds View, MN 55112 The Mounds View City Council was called to order by 1. Call to Order Mayor McCarty at 7:30 PM on October 24, 1983. MEMBERS PRESENT: Councilmembers Hankner, Blanchard, 2. Roll Call Doty, Linke, and Mayor McCarty ALSO PRESENT: City Attorney Mcycrs, Clerk/ Administrator Pauley and Public Works/Community Development Director Johnson. Motion/Second: Linke/Blanchard to approve the 3. Approval of October 10, 1983 minutes as corrected. Minutes: October 10, 1983 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Mayor McCarty closed the regular meeting and opened the public hearing 7:41 4. Public Hearing - at PM. Amendment to There was no one present with questions for the 48, Chapter Wetland Zoning ing Council. Ordinance Mr. John Miller stated he would like to make sure everything that has been submitted to the City would become a part of the record. He stated they submitted a preliminary plat in 1980 and that the moratorium ordinance went into effect in 1.981, after the Council had acted on the preliminary plat. This has stalled the project. Mr. Miller stated that the purpose of the public hearing tonight was for the Council to consider amending the wetlands map, and he pointed out that he had met with the Council on October 21, 1982 and told them the wetlands map was in error, and he has continued to tell them that. Mr. Miller asked that the Council be sure to take into consideration his letter of October 20, 1983, stating that he had reviewed the Braun Engineering ■ October 24, 1983 Mounds View City Council Page Two Regular Meeting ---------------------- ` ------------------------- report with his consultants, Barr Engineering, and they were in substantial agreement with it. lie asked that the Braun Engineering report be accepted by the City so he could proceed with Phase I of their development. Bruce Malkerson, attorney for the Millers, asked that by reference, everything that had been pre- sented to the City to date regarding the Miller property be incorporated into the record, including all exhibits, correspondence, maps and so forth. Director Johnson asked the Council to consider also entering into the records the letters received from Tom Peterson of the Minnesota Soil and Water Conservation District, dated October 19, 1983,and the one from Dr. Russell Adams, from the Ramsey Soil and Water Conservation District, dated October 20, 1983. Attorney Meyers advised that the issue to be decided during this hearing was to consider a redelineation of wetlands on the Miller property. Director Johnson made a presentation, using a map . of the area, showing the different wetland boundaries established by the Wetland Ordinance and Barr and Braun reports for the area. Mr. Malkerson asked that the map be marked for future reference. The Council labeled the map Public Hearing Exhibit 1, dated October 24, 1983, which is a compilation, subject to refinement, of the boundary delineations from discussions in the public hearing. Mr. Jim Miller presented the Council with a micro- fich reproduction of construction plans from the County Highway Department, which shows the actual area around 85th Avenue North, and the location of the culvert that was placed on the property. Director Johnson clarified the purpose of the cul- vert, stating that it had been installed flat, and they had not been able to locate the culvert in the field, to see what condition it was in, noting that it was installed over 50 years ago. Mr. Miller's map was labeled Public Hearing Exhibit 2, with the notation that the culvert had not been proven to be there. Mr. Miller explained they have dug in the area they believe the culvert to be in, and they have found evidence of material that would be located at the entrance to a culvert. lie added that Barr Engineering had made notations of the elevations �i Mounds View City Council October 24, 1983 Regular Mecting Page '1'hxee ------------------------------------------------------------------------ of the area and their property is considerably higher than the di.LCII on 85th Avenue. Ile stated if there was a culvert there, the water would drain off. John Miller noted that Mr. Kramer of Barr Engineering had stated before that water would drain off the property. Jim Miller stated that reference had been made to that fact in the wetlands alteration permit application. Mayor McCarty expressed concern with having the schematics entered into the minutes, as there were too many ambiguities. Councilmember Hankner noted that page 4 of the Barr report addresses the issue of the culvert and drainage. Mayor McCarty closed the public hearing and reopened the regular meeting at 8:04 PM. Councilmember Linke stated he would prefer to deal with 1-22 separately, as the Braun Engineering report states it does not function as a wetland. Motion/Secund: Linke/Hankner to direcc Staff to prepare an ordinance, to eliminate in its entirety, the wetland now designated and shown as 1-22. 4 ayes 1 nay Councilmember Doty voted against the motion, stating he did not believe the evidence warranted the motion at this time. Councilmember Linke stated his reasons for the motion were that conditions have changed according to what the City initially thought when the ordinance was drafted, and there was an error when the report was prepared. There was considerable discussion among the Council as to what documentation there is to support the belief there were errors. Councilmember Linke pointed out the two consulting firms have not put in writing that errors were made, but they have verbally stated it. Mayor McCarty noted the report refers to run-off for the development and has nothing to do with 1-22. Attorney Meyers reminded the Council a 4/5 vote is required, and they must have a rational basis Motion Carried Mounds View City Council October 24, 1983 Regular Meeting --------------------- Page Pour ---------------------------------------- for implementing a change in the ordinance. Neil Loeding questioned the addendum to the Barr is report, regarding the wetland data sheet. Mr. Malkerson referred to Chapter 48.01, Subd. 3 a, reviewing the requirements, and stated it is the Millers position that the area identified as 1-22 is so small in size and unrelated to the other areas that it never should have been identified as an existing, functional wetland. He added that while the Council may have written reports which may or may not say something, the Courts have said City Councils are responsible to listen to all parties, and make their conclusions by what facts are deemed relevant. He stated that if the Council believes the wetland does not function in the way it should be in order to be protected, they should make their decision and vote accordingly, interpreting the facts and applying them to the question before them. Mayor McCarty stated he was not sure anyone could address the adverse precedence of removing a wetland, as it relates to other similar situations in the City. • Councilmember Hankner pointed out the question was put to the experts at Barr and Braun, and there is a question if the area is functioning as a wetland. Mr. Malkerson stated he believes it is important procedurally for the Council to vote on an ordinance that has all the language in it, and that Staff should be directed to prepare it so that everyone knows what they are voting on. He also agreed that the authorization to prepare this ordinance is not a final vote but only the preparation of an ordinance to be considered by the Council. Motion/Second: McCarty/Linke to amend the main motion to include, in concurrence with drafting of the ordinance, written reports from the engineers and professionals involved in the preparation of the Barr and Braun reports, specifically Dr. Russell Adams, to convey to the Council in writing, the actual facts regarding the function of wetland 1-22. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Motion/Second: Hankner/Blanchard to direct staff to draft an amendment to the ordinance to redefine the wetland boundaries of 1-23 according to the Braun report. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Mounds View City Council October 24, 1983 Regular Meeting Page rive ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Councilmember Hankner explained her reasons for the motion, both the errors and the change in conditions, and at the time the ordinance was adopted, it was understood that the inventory that was adopted of the wetland map covered a certain amount of the area, and because the City has done some on -site data collection, they have discovered it is not what it was thought Lo be. Mayor McCarty sLaLed there must be an understanding that the Phase II proposal, goes further into the wetlands still than what the ordinance contemplates. and they must not maximize exploitation of the property. Mr. Malkerson pointed out the Miller's have spent a great deal of time and money for engineers and draftsmen to prepare all the plans that have been requested to date, and they need a more definite direction from the Council, and thev need the issue voted on, so they can proceed to come up with a redefinition so they can take the next step. Mayor McCarty asked if the Miller's would be willing to withdraw their request for a subdivision for Phase I and Phase II, until clarifications of the delineations of the wetland. John Miller stated they are not requesting Phase II. Motion/Second: McCarty/Doty to amend the main motion, t al t e re elineation of the wetland not be construed as approval of the proposal for Phase I or Phase II for the subdivisions. 5 ayes 0 nays Acting Police Chief Smith reported 512 citations had been issued in the third quarter for traffic offenses, with 81 adults arrested for crimes other than traffic violations. He reported everything is going very well with the outdoor volleyball at the Loose Ends nightclub, and that everything went well with the Mermaid grand re -opening. Acting Chief Smith reported they had had their annual qualification for firearms, and one officer has completed the course on firearms instruction. There were no residents requests or comments from the floor. Motion Carried 5. 3rd Quarter 198 Department Head Report - Acting Police Chief Smith 6. Residents Re- quests and Comments from the Floor Mounds View City Council Regular Meeting ----------------------------------------------- Motion/Second: Blanchard/Ilankner to approve the consent agenda, as presented, and waive the reading of the resolutions. 5 ayes 0 udys Mayor McCarty requostcd the Council's concurrence with the proposed appointment of Kathy Pomerleau to the Festivities Commission. Motion/Second: Doty/Linke to appoint Kathy Pomerleau to the Festivities Commission, in concurrence with Mayor McCarty's request. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion/Second: Linke/Iiankner to deny the Director of Public Works/Community Development position to be held by an outside consultant. However, the Council can make other arrangements with the person in that position for how the benefit package would be handled in the way of pay -outs, but that the person in that position be under all current policies in regard to the other department heads within the City staff. 3 ayes 2 nays Mayor McCarty and Councilmember Doty voted against the motion. Mayor McCarty reviewed the discussion at the 7 PM special meeting, held earlier in the evening, to discuss Mr. Johnson's request to continue as a consultant, rather than a full time employee, and the areas the Council was in agreement with. Director Johnson stated the key issue is that there be an employment contract that allows him to do certain things with the IRS that he would not be able to do as a full time employee. Attorney Meyers advised that the position could not be both, that it is either a full time position or a consulting position, and that if it is a consultant position, the terms and conditions should be set out in an agreement. Clerk/Administrator Pauley advised that under IRS regulations, Director ,Johnson could stipulate on his W-4 that he wanted no deductions withheld. Ile also advised that if Director Johnson was to become a full time employee, he would be required by law to have PERA, Social Security, werkers-eemh-and URemP}eyffiemb-eamp and State Income taxes withheld. October 24, 1983 Page Six ---------------- 7. Approval of Consent Age9 Motion Carried 0. Consideration of Application from Kathy Pomerleau for Appointment to Festivities Commission Motion Carried 9. Consideration of Employment Arrangements for Director of Public Works/ Community Dvlo. Motion Carr# 0 Mounds View City Council October 24, 1983 Regular Meeting Page Seyen --------------------------------------------------------------------- Motion/Second: McCarty/Doty to amend the main motion to continue John Johnson's consultant status for the first quarter of 1984, and reconsider the main motion at that time. 2 ayes 3 nays Motion Failed Councilmembers Linke, Blanchard and Hankner voted against the motion, stating they believed it was important to have someone in that position as a full time employee beginning at the first of the year, and that it is necessary to have someone at City Hall full time, and that they could foresee problems arising with the other department heads over privleges granted to someone on a consultant basis, and that they need consistency in management for moraloreasons, and effective operation of the department. Mayor McCarty stated he felt it was important for Mr. Johnson to continue at least through the first quarter of 1984, due to the many programs that have been started that he did not want left without supervision. Councilmember Linke pointed out that at any given time, there are new projects starting up, and unfinished projects to be completed, and the end of the first quarter of 1984 would not be that different than any other time during the year. Councilmember Doty stated that Mr. Johnson has brought many skills to the City, which have benefited the City. He stated he was aware they have had problems with him in the manager/ department head role, but he did not feel they were that bad. He added that he is not opposed to the position being a full time department head position. Motion/Second: McCarty/Blanchard to approve the 10. 2nd Reading and second reading and adoption of Ordinance No. 349, Adoption of as amended, and waive the reading. Ordinance No. Councilmember Hankner - aye 349 Councilmember Blanchard - aye Councilmember Doty - aye Councilmember Linke - aye Mayor McCarty - aye Motion Carried Director Johnson reviewed his memo of October 11. Consideration 20, to the Council, regarding his recommendation of Staff Recom- for the storm sewer construction on St. Stephen mendation for Street, Contracting of St. Stephen St. Drainage Corr. Mounds View City Hall October 24, 1983 Regular MeeLing Page Eight, , ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Motion/Second: Doty/Blanchard to authorize Staff to execute a purchase order to Ray Perron for the pro- posed storm sewer improvement work on St. Stephen Street in the amount of $2,249.15, plus up to $480.00 at $60.00 per hour for dewatering work, if necessary, and also to authorize Staff to execute a purchase order for necessary materials for the project, esti- mated at $2,008.25, with the funding to come from the SIN fund. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Director Johnson reported the inspection of. Tower 12. Report of No. 2 had started. Ile also reported there had been Director of a water main break on Sunday, as well as another one Public Works/ earlier in the evening, at Adams and County Road I. Community Dvlp. Director Johnson reminded the Council he will be in Brainerd on October 26 to meet with the MSA screening committee. Attorney Meyers turned a check for $1,000 over to 13. Report of Clerk/Administrator Pauley, explaining it was the Attorney final payment relative to the City Hall lawsuit, which will complete the file. He added that the total amount recovered was $24,000. Councilmember Hankner had no report. 14. Reports of Councilmembers Councilmember Blanchard reported the Planning Commission has finalized their revisions of the zoning code, and will have a special meeting on October 26 to go over it. She added they hope to have a copy to the Council by next week, Councilmember Doty reported he will be meeting with the personnel and labor relations committee of the League of Cities on October 26. Councilmember Doty reminded the Council of the park dedication of Silver View Park on October 29. Mayor McCarty stated he would be unable to attend, due to work committments, and asked Councilmember Blanchard to fill in for him. Councilmember Lirke advised he had attended the Ramsey County League meeting on October 19 regard- ing waste disposal plants in Ramsey and Washington counties. He added they hope to have a decision on a course of action by Cho end of the year. Mayor McCarty presented a copy of an update on cabel tv legislation to Clerk/Administrator Pauley. Mounds View City Council October 24, 1983 Regular Meeting Page Njpe ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Mayor McCarty gave a summary of the testimony he gave at the Met Council meeting on October 19. Clerk/Administrator Pauley advised that the Fire Department will be conducting a drill at City Hall on October 25, and they will be doing drills for all day and night• shifts for all three cities. Clerk/Administrator Pauley reminded the Council that next Monday is the fifth Monday of the month, and there would be no meeting. Clerk/Administrator Pauley advised the Council of a public hearing by the Met Council on the airport issue, at 1 PM on November 1, at Westwood Jr. High in Blaine. Councilmember Blanchard requested that the flag be flown at half-mast in memory of the tragedy in Lebanon. Motion/Second: Blanchard/Linke to adjourn the meeting at 9:52 PM. 15. Report of Administrator 16. Adjournment 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried