The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAgenda Packets - 1983/01/09CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW January 9, 1984 7:30 p.m. A G E N D A 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call - Linke, Hankner, Blanchard, Doty, McCarty 3. Approval of Minutes: December 27, 1983 (Regular Meeting) (Received copy of Minutes in 1/3/84 packet.) 4. Public Hearing - 7:40 p.m. - Rezoning from R-1, Single Family Residential, to R-2, Single and Two Family Residential, for Property Located at 5468 Adams Street 5. Residents Requests and Comments from the Floor ------------------------------------------------ CITIZENS: BEFORE SPEAKING PLEASE GIVE YOUR FULL NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE MINUTES ------------------------------------------------ 6. Approval of Consent Agenda ITEM A. Appoint Director of Public Works/Community Development to Rice Creak iiuter...h..-d D:.Ctr:.Ct 5D9 Techa_cal Tri Sri anry Committee ITEM B. Approve Addendum to the Memorandum of Understanding Between the Mounds View City Council and Donald Pauley ITEM C. Set Public Hearing for Rezoning of Property Located at 2651 County Road I from I-1, Light Industrial District, to B-3, Highway Business District, for 7:40 p.m. on January 23, 1984 ITEM D. Approve Resolution No. 1701 Commending Jana Sjodin for Placing First in the Grand Prize International Figure Skating Competition in Czechoslovakia ITEM E. Approve Resolution No. 1439 Special Assessment of Edgewood Square Plat ITEM F. Licenses for Approval ITEM G. Approve Resolution No. 1702 Approving Just and Correct Claims Against City Funds -continued- AGENDA January 9, 1984 Page Two 7. First Reading of ordinance No. 353 Amending the Municipal Code of Mounds View by Amending Chapter 91 Entitled, "Specific Rezonings" 8. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding Purchase of Police Patrol Vehicles 9. Report of Attorney 10. Report of Councilmembers - Linke, Hankner, Blanchard, Doty, McCarty 11. Report of Administrator 12. Adjournment f 0 Ara `ti / CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA NOTICE OF PUBLIC NEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Mounds View City Council will meet on Monday, January 9, 1983 at 7:40 p.m. at Mounds View City Hall, Z401 Highway 10, Mounds View, Minnesota, 55112 to consider the rezoning from R-1, Single Family Residential to R-2, Single and Two Family Residential for property located at 5468 Adams Street. Legal Description of the property is as follows: Registered Land Survey No. 389 Tract B Anyone desiring to be heard with reference to this matter may be heard at this meeting. (Bulletin: December 29, 1983) Donald F. Pauley Clerk -Administrator 6 CONSENT AGENDA January 9, 1984 The Consent Agenda is a technique designed to expedite handling of routine and miscellaneous official business of the City Council. The entire Agenda may be adopted by the Council in one motion. The motion for adoption is non -debatable and must receive unanimous approval. By request of any individual Councilmember, any item can be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed upon the Regular Agenda for debate. ITEM A. Appoint Director of Public Works/Community Development to Rice Creek Watershed District 509 Technical Advisory Committee ITEM B. Approve Addendum to the Memorandum of Understanding Between the Mounds View City Council and Donald Pauley ITEM C. Set Public Hearing for Rezoning of Property Located at 2651 County Road I from I-1, Light Industrial District, to B-3, Highway Business District, for 7:40 p.m. on January 23, 1984 ITEM D. Adopt Resolution No. 1701 - Commending Jana Sjodin for Placing First in the Grand Prize International Figure Skating Competition in Czechoslovakia ITEM E. Adopt Resolution No. 1439 - Special Assessment of Edgewood Square Plat ITEM F. Licenses for Approval General - Expire 6/30/84 Sunnyside Builders, Inc. - New ITEM G. Adopt Resolution No. 1702 - Approving Just and Correct Claims Against City Funds W Cn 3 ADDENDUM MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING between the MOUNDS VIEW CITY COUNCIL and MR. DONALD PAULEY, CLERK -ADMINISTRATOR The Mounds View City Council hereby amends Section 2. of the Memorandum of Understanding between the Mounds View City Council and Mr. Donald Pauley, Clerk -Administrator, dated March 25, 1981, adding the following: by The City further agrees to deposit into the ICMA - Retirement Corporation Deferred Compensation Program in the name of Donald F. Pauley, the full amount budgeted for the City's monthly insurance contribu- tion for the Clerk -Administrator position. This contribution is being made in consideration of Mr. Pauley's election to waive health insurance coverage as approved by Resolution No. 1665, adopted on October 10, 1983. It is further agreed that this addendum shall become null and void should Mr. Pauley choose to elect to re-enter the City's health insurance program. This addendum will become effective and valid when signed and authorized by both listed parties. Mr. Donald Pau ey Clerk -Administrator Date Mr. Duane McCarty Mayor, City of Mounds View Date RESOLUTION NO. 1701 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION COMMENDING JANA SJODIN FOR PLACING FIRST IN THE GRAND PRIZE INTERNATIONAL FIGURE SKATING COMPETITION IN CZECHOSLOVAKIA WHEREAS, Jana Sjodin, daughter of Nancy and Ken Sjodin, Mounds View, and 12-year old student at High View Junior High School, placed first in the Grand Prize International Figure Skating Competition in Czechoslovakia; and WHEREAS, Jana, a member of the St. Paul Figure Skating Club, represented the United States in the junior ladies division where there were 24 competitors from 19 countries. West Germany finished second; East Germany third; and Russia fourth; and WHEREAS, Jana won her division in the Midwestern Figure Skating Championships in 1982 and will compete in the National Figure Skating Championships in Salt Lake City next month. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mounds View, on behalf of the residents of the City of Mounds View, hereby congratulate and heartily commend Jana Sjodin on placing first in the Grand Prize International Figure Skating Competition in Czechoslovakia and' cxtend best wishes for her continued success. Adopted this 9th day of January, 1984. ATTEST: Mayor McCarty Counci mem er B anc and Councilmember Doty Councilmember liankner Councilmember Linke (SEAL) C erk-Administrator Pauley rMEMO TO: Clerk -Administrator and City Council FROM: Building Inspector DATE: January 5, 1984 SUBJECT: SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR EDGEWOOD SQUARE CONSENT AGENDA ITEM E Attached Resolution No. 1439 and special assessment agreement were approved as part of Development Agreement No. 8-54 with Good Value Homes, Inc. Although it was approved part of the development agreement in Exhibit 2A, it must be officially approved by resolution by the City Council and signed by the applicable parties before it can be filed with Ramsey County. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Resolution No. 1439 be a proved assubmitted. SAR/bc Attachment f�N RESOLUTION NO. 1439 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA SPECIAL ASSESSMENT OF EDGEWOOD SQUARE PLAT WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Mounds View has approved a final plat known as Edgewood Square, of which a copy is hereby attached; and WHEREAS, the property being subdivided by the final plat was only partially assessed at the time the original improve- ments were installed for water and sewer; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that some of the newly platted lots derive an in -place utilities benefit from the original improvements; and WHEREAS, it has been the practice of the City to special assess the remainder of the improvement benefit at the time of a subdivision; and WHEREAS, the fee owner and contract for deed purchaser -. have reviewed the special assessment form, hereto attached with Exhibit A, and agree to the contents; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mounds View hereby authorizes its Mayor and Clerk - Administrator to execute the Special Assessment Agreement. ATTEST: (SEAL) Adopted this day of ,1984. Mayor Clerk -Administrator A G R E E M E N T THIS AGREEMENT, made this day of 19_, by and between the City of Mounds View, a municipal corpora- tion, in the County of Ramsey and State of Minnesota, hereinafter called the City and _ Good Valuc Ilomes Inc (contract purchaser)/ Marcc'lle Z• Faselius (owner)_ the fee owner and/or contract purchaser who owns the following described property: Edgewood Square Plat, Lots 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16; WHEREAS, the said property is a (are) newly created lot(s) from an approved subdivision and it is necessary that special assess- ments be apportioned against the newly created lot(s); and WHEREAS, the owner hereby agrees to a reapportionment of said assessments; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED that this document shall �., be considered a petition as provided for in Chapter 8 of the Home Rule Charter and Chapter 26 of the Municipal Code which the owner understands allows the City to specially assess his property without public hearings and the owner hereby waives all of the Charter, muni- cipal and statutory requirements to enable the City to certify an assessment to the Ramsey County Auditor's office and the owner hereby agrees to allow the City, by its own action to assess the above described property in the amount set out in the Exhibit hereto attached, for a 1_ year period at 12% interest, commending the first day of January following the date of this Agreement, and owner further agrees that all assessments and interest thereon shall be collected in the same manner as other municipal taxes. The owner further understands that he may at any time pay to the County Treas- urer the entire amount of the assessments remaining unpaid, with the interest accrued to December 31st of the year in which such payment is made. IT IS FURTHER AGREED that in lieu of certification of the assessment to the Ramsey County Auditor's office, the owner may pay to the City of Mounds View this assessment amount in full and without AGREEMENT Page 2 interest within thirty days of the date of this Agreement. Failure to make such payment will result in certification of the assess- ment as outlined in the above paragraph. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have hereunto affixed their common and corporate seal and/or signature to duplicate copies hereof the day and year first above -written. In Presence of: Fee Owner Contractor Purchaser FOR THE CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW: • Mayor Clerk -Administrator • Data Processing Number: Edgewood Square Plat. Lot 1 Data Processing Number; Edgewood Square Plat Lot 2 Data Processing Number Edgewood Square Plat Lot 3 Data Processing Number: Edgewood Square Plat Lot 5 Data Processing Number: Edgewood Square Plat Lot 6 Data Processing Number: Edgewood Square Plat Lot 7 Data Processing Number: Edgewood Square Plat Lot 9 Data Processing Number: Edgewood Square Plat Lot 9 Data Proraccing Numher: Edgewood Square Plat Lot 10 Data Processing Number: Edgewood Square Plat Lot 11 Data Processing Number: Zdgewood Square Plat Lot 12 Data Processing Number: Edgewood Square Plat Lot 13 Data Processing Number: Edgewood Square Plat Lot 14 • ' Data Processing Number: Edgewood Square Plat Lot 15 Data Processing Number; Edgewood Square Plat Lot 16 1"'XIIII31T A Unit Sewer & Water. $472.25 Unit Sewer L Water $472.25 Unit Sewer & Water $472.25 Unit Sewer & Water $472.25 Unit Sewer & Water $472.25 Unit Sewer & Water Unit Sewer & Water $472.25 $472.25 Unit Scher L tdatcr $472.25 ttnit Sea:er t ;•later °""' ^J Yy.G. GJ Unit Sewer & Water $472.25 Unit Sewer & Water Unit Sewer &.Water $472.24 $472.24 Unit Sewer & Water $472.24 Unit Sewer & Water $472.24 Unit Sewer & Water $472.24 TOTAL $7,083.70 /1 R2SOLUTICN NO, 1702 (2) CITY OF 1N1UNUS VTI!tY COUNTY OF IM;EY S1'A'i'E OF MINNEJOI. APPROVING JUST AND CORRNCT CLATMI AGAINST CITY FIINUS WHERFAS, L1rc City Council of Mounds View, pursuant to Mbuiesota Statutes 41:L.21,1, has I'ull authority over the finaneial affairs of the City and; 1'fiIEREAS, The City Council has reviewed the elsims numbers; 17390 through 17400 in the amount of $ 39,343.59 17382 through 17389 in the amount of $ 33,734.77 12745 through 12830 in the amount of $ 62,709.10 through in the amount of $ TOTAL MOUNT OF CLAIMS PRESENTED $ 135,787.46 and has found said claims to be Just and correct; (list of any exception) NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved that the City Council of ?.founds View hereby approved the attached lists of claims dated by the vote ayes __ nayes ATTEST; (SEAL) Mayor Clerk-Adm nistrator ADDITIONAL DIRECT EXPEND1131RES 1^:IIECK AMOUNT CLAIMANT PURPC3-1: 17382 { 31157,75 Group Ilealth Plan, Inc. Insurance 17383 30,193.16 First State Bank Salaries 17334 113.38 LICIT - llealth Protection Insurance 17385 7.80 Minnesota Mutual Life Insurance 17386 84.10 Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance 17387 70.00 University of Minnesota Conferences 17388 44.00 Advance United Supplies 17389 64.58 City of Mounds View Petty Cash $339734.77 CITY OF MCUVC;i VIEn A ., l T F Y L L DGic -'I al -64 FA:;! 1 CHE U. t H ;, L f C 017390 29E.'1.9 L : PUSTHAFTtE f:STAIE _._ ., 017391 :.�o �TAT� 1Fr,r• ;tJ=L> � �'�:,�. �„ 017392 Zr`Z]•93 STCTF 1•.LaS - i F. � � r .J•1`'!" ___ 017393 3P..I6 fifiAWK OF ;cLG-1E„ FEGL'lA' C1795 ':17396 - 2r15u,05 $fail I:C�.U-i' FfNS1uN; ___._ 017397 299362,46 FIFST STAT1. t;:NK OF r4LARI(Sr REGULAR ANU-SALA�IESJEMPWAP.T TIME _._ AND-CVE01ME', 4E(iGLAP 7.19 RCSEVILLr. CH'.V-UE . SUPPLiLSr E HiCL------ 017399 2rE10.00 SYSTEMS RRLSIAFCH ASSOC OTHER PICFESS1ONhl SLRV ` r,1740r 260.54 IChA f0lkEH;hT tGFP 1J 39r347.59 NICLSSARY F.XFF.%IOTTLhLS SIN,:C LtST COUNCIL "'ECTiNC —_ - —_i - L 7Y oF VI 'A CM K A M a U C L jj P it Pi 11-L ELEC 1P01! -S P. LP A 0 1 R- FA v ( T f." C 012741 HE TRO iiAS11' C010RCL OC L ;"Utim G127 X 1; P C LLU T I C it 11 L dGCr I F A I h I ING 1,749 y Eli i1 L ;: oti I PS i.12750 73, .0 1 F L 4 41, 61 DONALD PAULEY OFFICE 'JUPPL 612751. L Ir' ?S2 'I 0ri L P Ey c W!50 C(LINTY L; '.LLE SPRING LK PARK FIRE OPT PRCF-;S'jlOhAL SERY AL2754 81094,62 `012M 45. fA STATE-J' 81?.756 270,13 'A if13 UnIVERSITY OF PIhN CUNFERENCLS 9Q.00 Lt*',6r'q4T 161- Sul AL OF P4PK/REC AOI1 1275.) 32,00 IPA USA W ?60 CLLA:; -TOWLLS TAGS A v, E R ICI, N L 11.. t� SUPPLY GO 7. 40 eLLEMILS 71 1, " T-,41 1NSIRUGTO-�l "'v'k-5, 360,00 BODY EVOLUTION INC F;oOGRAH 012763 764 3"50 C Occ 0 0 CUINSOLIDAIED ELECTRIC RLPAIRS9 EQUIVI01 112 765 SUPPLIESi GIOGSOGRNOS 3127bb 392.52 CONTRACT CLEANING AND-JAN17CR SERVICE - MOTOR FUELS + LUERICANTS 012767 ---------- Dt YIE5 W p I �.q 0 U 1 P P E N T 269992 103901) ELECTPIC SPLC INC Supp"Icst UTILIII.'.S 012769 CITY OF MCIINOS VIEW ACCOUNT-) P i. r A I.: L .'. Ui,TC L1-1':-64 CHi;CK• A M 0 Ut T C L A I Y b e T L t, J GUM 126.64 FULP dY FvUs. SLPP11- _..j: 4 .T 012771 44.1 GCFH:: c•iujrw f,J SUP�LIc , .. Jir`i.,T 012772 293.54 GCFMc= OIL GU+PAI.r ivPPlIi:•,C :-iT_',v :. 012773 102.22 N k ISRl.IhtiEl ?r,C SUPPL1E:,C'rt li J12174 320. 70 h:�HKIli ;-it LdlCl.L I1,; FfP., i! C'., r • , hdS - ! —� G12775 87.40 J C AuTu SUPPLY `14P4it5, 'r_h.CL;' 012776 1031E.25 JOIN C JCHNSON 01H a P4CFL'S1CNa1 SERV A+iu-A�Mll\. CMAicti PAYABLE ` 012777 19.51 LILLIL SUaU'0P41'1 !,ch5 ACuc=.11�cPL'i(; D12778 61. 78 NEL$ VAN-0-LIT" $UPPl;ES,GNIkt IU+L � AND -SUPPLIES, uLU:S+ORNOS -- UlZy79 - 19.r+0t1Nl.,i4til'!;_-i Nt Eat FONE CC"r 1cPHONE >r 012781) 4, 40 Nc n 14111A4 FOP, jNC SLP.'L I , GU:'P,.NT r r 'i 012791 157.49 HPLS .;IAR + 1FID'JhE aOVcNi1'iEF,EiTT� ' • is 012782 963.7l. N M iicLl I EL;'i 140!4t GJ JcM fUGICuI IOO5-IEL.LFHONE 012783 220.07 N" 1 i2:i1GhTON 1:•'d. :uPPLI:S, STREETS 19 — _ ArrD-SUPPLIESo U ILITI S y'! AN0-SUPPLIES,OPEFATING ANO-SJPPLIES, OIUGS+GRNOS n SUPPL1ES,uP�kATING AND-MOTU(i FUELS + LUBRICANTS u AND -OTHER PROFESSION 'r A , ANO-SUPPLIES, HUGS* Q� �, n Gi278 93.70 NG;Th1:KN bOLT + TUrL GU SUPPLIE„10PERATIN6 012786 137.22 Ni+=.TV1E-N S141., 012787 :oa.GO CnaAlu PAJI.r CONFERENCES sH t AND -MILEAGE.: j 012788 129.d5 LOIA BOTTLING CO F E F U A C 1{{— 0- 1C�T89 2r.'.ld F! C35 SAIES $tkVICE SLPPLiEi,r'OUiFMEN 01279111 66.b0 ROAO kUMLF PARCEL S:n CCNT. JVCS., DELIVER �1 �R FIR y, CIT Y OF MLUHU' VT: W CH_( 40 A H O U :i T ,:1' 791 01279 3 G 12 794 i1279> 012796 712797 64,40 c57.16 A C C- L C L A i t< !; T F4PfLA S DOSE S t I UFf1LE F�Q�tCT, if PAUL AHL' Sbt-VuAF, �,!',ITI• LV"(L, ET PAUL ,:LCF;t`TATICNEi•:Y ST PAUL ulSPATGH Sh ANK CDTICN FICTURES 612798 224.C3 TL)GAS 012799 29.70 N R_TOLL COMPANY C12806 2357,.15 TkoCY oIL GO INC C12A01 243.A� THIN CITY ENGINE RL:UILO 012802 1309H THIN CITY TESTING 00iD 71,3, UNITOG kl!:TALS wSTcA ui2o0v 305.9i Y; h!7LR6 %i c Li; 012805 6E.00 HALTERS CISPOSAL SERIICE )12805 -- — 97.L8 hLTER Pr�oimCTi: C.) 012A07 1td17.h4 CITY CF o,/TE .,ELR LAKL 012608 129.38 ALvIH !iARG 012809 232.50 OULG BLUINER 017610 430.00 MIKE RLACK.STON 012,111 144:34-_'IrKT CULLEN_ 012512 29.75 AARON F'AHRMANN u U c o . _ ;Ali.r!::,,lEMrtPAgl TIME ,. '.LFFLieL,.'.: to'NUS ^: 0 `Lr I'L icC,01 ;;eATIUU .. L:[ SUPPLiE:. I1's AOVERThH,LHIS SUPPl3l::tc�..'�wilt,L- ------ INVENTURI SUPPLIEStUPERATIN C jUPPLiiS. EUU;r VD,l OTMLH PRCFESS1UNAL StRV LtI1FCnH5 1 CLGTHi!16 purr L1E7� ��f11 LLL REFUSE COLLECTI014 WOOLS UTILITIES SALAQIESt kEGULAR _ --- faND=SACARIt��1rE�+PA?T�— AND-FENSICNS AND-F.I.L.A. Ar,U-ChLUi is.;uRANCE p1:0-h 9KLPS LCMFENSATION SALA:,IEStTERPrpp�T 11M SALAN1ES1TE!1P+PART TIME..' :,.LAZIESOLMPtPA«T TIOE �I _:,_�-7EStiT% FtflAfl TI!1E i PRUC. ..N 1hi; T• „ iJLS OF MOUNDS VUW A C C i S P A Y r. 6 L I rfi. J1•:. '. r i iLCK• A M 0 U T C 1 i T: tl T P U 813 19 Pti*PLOT TINE 2834 i4J. a �hnA PC- lttr.0i PSCo' • S1 , CT': S 2P.15 ?1.75 !i-'Ti .,hhyTA17 f'hUbkGh lt;lnl;CiG•S 2816 106,88 OCLANO ROST '.4LARIES,TGMP+PAH1 TIME 2817 157.7C 0F.E0 WESTERLUNG I:1 2818 13I.26 FiAlP ..IGSTRANC- -„L4Ait3,IEMP+FA,'I TINE 2819 21,20 GEhEFAL COMMUNICATION. SUPPLIES, VEHICLE 2820 7,5C KPIS O:CKIhSON P E F U g 0 2621 105.00 C. W. .,AvltS CU SUPPLIES,CPERATING 2822 142,V FU-STNCR AL;S INi SLPPliES,CPI't<<iTING 2823 1D,350.01 CUAhi TLa+:•K C A S L I T V CCNNISSICN 282N 24.95 FLCYi7 tI:C1,r1Tr SUPPLIESIOPERAIINI 1825 25.h0 JIM PAT10N R E F U N D •+�i: 2826 5.00 NORA AiAL NAN RE F U fl U 9 eev 2Y �n Rn an :;AN: v9A": T.: 2828 22.5C CAII ROPERISON li E F U h 0 -- 2b29 - 9u.60 -- MICWCST I�Ia SEPViCE CUkA - - -- - hcP., BLCCS — * �CUNGS 2b30 311.:15 FICNUx ilt CC SUPPLIES, E,WIPNLNI 86 629 709. 10 Lh_CKS WKITT.N f. IhL OF 9b Ct+ECKS TJTLL 1,2,052.c`i - - W&4,_ 7 MEMO TO: City Council and clerk -Administrator FROM: Engineering/Planning Technician DATE: January 5, 1984 SUBJECT: CROSS OF GLORY LUTHERAN CHURCH REZONING Per discussion at the January 3, 1984 Agenda meeting, attached please find for first reading ordinance No. 353 which rezones the Cross of Glory Lutheran Church educational building property from R-1 to R-2. Staff is in the process of dcvelooing revised zoning code language which addresses the Council's concerns regarding day care facilities. This material should be ready for discussion at your January 16, 1984 Agenda Session. If you have any additional input in regards to day care facilities or this rezoning, please contact me. FJK/jj C ORDINANCE NO. 353 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE. AMENDING THE MUNICIPAL. CODE. OF MOUNDS VIEW BY AMENDING CHAPTER 41 ENTITLED, "SPECIFIC REZONINGS" The Council of the City of Mounds View does hereby ordain: SECTION I. 41.13 Pursuant to Chapter 0.23, the Official Mounds View Zoning Map is hereby amended to reflect the following rezoning: Subdivision 1. Registered Land Survey No. 389, Tract B, is rezoned from R-1 to R-2. This ordinance shall take effect thirty days after the date of its publication. Read by the City Council of the City of Mounds View on this day of 1984. Read and passed by the City Council of the City of Mounds View this day of _ , 1984. ATTEST: (SEAL) APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney Mayor Clerk -Administrator TO: Mayor, City Coungj and Clerk -Administrator FROM: Police Chief DATE: January 5, 198 RE: PURCHASE OF POLICE PATROL VEHICLES On January 4, 1984 sealed bids were opened for two 1984 Police Patrol vehicles. The two bids received were as follows: 1) Minar Ford ----- $21,060.36 2) Midway Ford ---- $21,090.00 Both bids were for 1984 Fords(Crown Victoria). Both bids met the specification requirements(see attached bids). A 1983 Ford Crown Victoria was purchased by the Police Department last year. Currently that vehicle has approximately 35,000 miles on it. 1t has performed satisfactorily and maintenance costs have been low. RECOMMENDATION: Request City Council to accept the bid and authorize purchase of two 1984 patrol vehicles from Minar Ford in the amount of $21,060.36. The 1984 budgeted amount for purchase of two patrol vehicles is $23,000.00. CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW 2401 Highway 10 New Brighton, Minnesota 55112 rPROPOSAL FOR POLICE PATROL CAR TO: The City Council of Mounds View The undersigned hereby agrees to furnish Patrol Cars in accordance with specifications on file in the office of the Clerk -Administrator and which are attached: QUANTITY DESCRIPTION TOTAL COST 2 1964 Polirle484aCrown Victoria Model No. q4 ea nr dan Se20,844.36 Make Ford 21,060.36 anl[1.• PRICE 1NC_LVING ALTER-�S 6 It is agreed that the Patrol Cars will be delivered F.O.B. City of Mounds View; that the price quoted is net price which excludes Federal Tax and that delivery shall be made within days of receipt of order. Enclosed is a (cashier's check), (certified check), (bid bond) in the amount of _ _dollars, being at least five percent (5%) of the amount of the proposal made payable to the City of Mounds View as a proposal guarantee, which it is agreed by the undersigned will be forfeited in the event the Patrol Cars are not delivered if the bid is awarded to the undersigned. The proposal shall remain open for acceptance by the City for thirty (30) days after being opened. NAME OF INDIVIDUAL, PARTNER, OR CORPORATION Mi ar Ford Inc. ADDRESS 1100 S 1ver_✓ , AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE -- TITLE F TELEPHONE NUMBER 612 633-9010 DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS FOR POLICE PATROL SEDAN: Bidder's SPECIFICATIONS (minimum requirements) s ecification 1. Body Type sedan full size 4-door 2. Wheelbase not to exceed 116 inches 3. Engine minumum 250 cubic inch to maximum 307 cubic inch 2 barrel carburetion it C� with EPA rating of minimum 18 miles o t AW per gallon city driving 3oleIDja'b,„«l 4. , Radiator heavy duty Ue�_ 5. Transmission automatic, 3 speed, heavy duty, low gear lockout, auxiliary trans- mission cooler, turbo hydromatic 400 or equivalent 6. Generating system alternator, 90 amp. minimum JD n a1M 7. Battery 4000 watt minimum h 8. Rear Axle heavy duty — 9. Differential locking differential -T 10. Brakes power, disc front, semi, metallic lining V_,e 11. Springs front and rear heavy duty v_T_ 12. Tires first line four -ply tubeless, steelbelted radial P225-70, 15 inch yes 13. Frame full frame construction from front to rear __Vres 14. Steering po::er ar 15. Seating bench, heavy duty, also heavy duty front seat frame with full depth padding,(cloth) -T 16. Color light blue _ yes 17, Accessory Equipment A. air conditioner with high pressure, high temperature automatic cutout --i B. two spotlights, installed by dealer, 4 inch sealed beams, left and right _T C. fresh air -hot water heater with defroster attachment es D. front and rear bumper guards fie_ E. dual rear tail lights and stop lights, parking and tail lights to be flashing _ __�L.e F. heavy duty shock absorbers G. instrument panel, standard grouping N. front ashtray and lighter tips� Accessory Equipment continued I. Speedometer - must be accurate to within 2:, of all speeds to 100 MPII and shall inJicatc speed in five or less miles per hour divisions, needle H type indicator J. rearview mirror, day and night type e. K. sway bar, heavy duty type L. oil pressure gauge y�?-- M. amp meter, numeral lighted _ N. dash -controlled dash -controlled trunk release- 0. interior hood release �s— P. trunk light - to light when trunk dT— opens Q, standard AM radio —vies R. rear window defogger �e — s, tinted glass throughout ma's T. remote left and right hand exterior mirrors —� `—' -- u. intermittent windshield wipers V. tilt wheel - -i-- w. power doorlocks u`T' X. (option) heavy duty bucket seats (cloth) ' The detailed specifications forms shall be completed by answering "yes" or "no" in the provided blanks and by providing a detail for each item of the model, type (or where necessary), a description of what is to be provided. This additional information shall be attached to the detailed specification form. I l MINAR FORD, Inc. V_ Telephone 633.9010 1100 Sliver Lake Road CAR/TRUCK FLEET QUOTATION NEW BRIGHTON, MINNESOTA 55112 TO City of Hounds View/Clerk-Administrator MODEL NO.1984 Ford Crown Victoria "S" 2401 Highway 10 _ _ _ YEAR 4 Door Sedan 114.3" WB — Mounds View, HN 55112 Color: Light Blue — Factory list Prir..r Trmsp"r Lioun Charge-- _ _ 5.0L.- _ . 4-speed automatic overdrive transmission_-.-i- 100 amp alternator HD battery HD rear axle Traction-Lok rear axle - Power brakes (semi -metallic lining) HD springs ---- - —------- - - P225/70t15-BSW Police -Special. Fabric HD frame Power steering _-M-flight-beach.seat-HD. cloth trim_. Police package _ -- ' Air conditioning _ Q)_LE-RH_spotlights 4"(Dealer installed) _ Fresh air hot water heater and defroster Front 6 rear bgper__guards -- - _-_-Dual rear -flashing .ta1U1ghta 6 stop_lighto 30-ghmk absbe j Standard -instrument -panel grouping =� Front ashtray and lighter_- - 0-140 mph speedometer w/2 mph increments Day/Night rear view mirror HD front S rear stabilizer bars Gauges -oil pressure, voltmeter Dash -controlled trunk release nterior hood release AM radio -------.-- Rear window defroster ------ Total - Fleet Discount -------_-_--- ---- _.--- --- ---- Trade In Allowance - --- -- --.---_-- ------- -- ------- NET CASH DELIVERED PRICE — License Extra, Prices sublecl to change without notice. Ouotauon Subject to revision alter Delivery soon as possible alter receipt of order. MINAR FORD, Inc. DATE _— _._ 11Y _-.—..--- — Itllf.-__..._-- . --_-. IFAWM • a MINAR FORD, Inc, ' Telephone 633.9010 1100 Sliver Lake Road CAR/TRUCK FLEET QUOTATION NEW BRIGHTON, MINNESOTA 55112 TO.. City _pf !founds View/Clerk-Admieietretor _ MODEL NO. page 2--- 2401 Highway 10,.-- - - -- YEAR _... -- _ Hounds view, HH. 55112 — — -- — --- - _- ---r- FactoryList Prlce.__..-__-__ - - --- lidnspoitaumr Charge . --.-- - - --- - - - - - - --- --- Tinted glees--- ------•---_._ - ---- Remote control LH mirror_- _- Remote control RH mirror — — Interval windshield wipers— Tilt-_9Se@L30g EE - ..._ . Power. door. 1ock4------- ------ ----- - _Option: Bucket seat -cloth trim. Total - — Fleet Discorint _- TradelnAllowance------------ — -- —' -------------------- NET CASH DELIVERED PRICE —_.— License Extra. Prices subect io change wrthout notice, Ouotation subject to revision alter _—_- Delivery soon as possible after receipt of order, MINAR FORD, Inc, DATE--- y _ ._ III: -_ Fleet Manager _ - - - • ' CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW 2401 Highway 10 New Brighton, Minnesota 55112 C PROPOSAL FOR POLICE PATROL. CAR TO: The City Council of Mounds View The undersigned hereby agrees to furnish Patrol Cars in accordance with specifications on file in the office of the Clerk -Administrator and which are attached: U�ANTITY DESCPIPTIO, TOTAL COST 2 1984 Police Patrol Cars 10 388.00 each Model No. Crown_ victoria S — $ , Make X 2 0 $20,776.00 PR�INCLUDING ALTERIr S — . pJ It is agreed that the Patrol Cars will be delivered F.O.B. City of Mounds View; that the price quoted is net price which excludes Federal Tax and that delivery shall be made within _kL:-90 days of receipt of order. Enclosed is a (cashier's check), (certified check), (bid bond) in the amount of 57. $100 dollars, being at least five percent (5%) of the amount ui the proposal made payable to the City of Mounds View as a proposal guarantee, which it is agreed by the undersigned will be forfeited in the event the Patrol Cars are not delivered if the bid is awarded to the undersigned. The proposal shall remain open for acceptance by the City for thirty (30) days after being opened. NAME OF INDIVIDUAL, PARTNER, OR CORPORATION _ Midway Ford Company ADDRESS 2777 North Snellin Avenue Roseville Minnesota 55113 AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE TITLE General Sales Mono er TELEPHONE NUMBER 636.9200 —---- DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS FOR POLICE PATROL SEDAN: Bidder's SPECIFICATIONS (minimum re uq irements) Specification 1. Body Type sedan full size 4-door Yee 2. Wheelbase not to exceed 116 inches _ _Yee-_-_..-, 3. Engine minumum 250 cubic inch to maximum 307 cubic inch 2 barrel carburetion with EPA rating of minimum 18 miles EPA 17 City 27 Hwy 20 Comb. per gallon city driving _�_-- 4. Radiator heavy duty---- 5. Transmission automatic, 3 speed, heavy duty, v y Heavy Duty Police Model low gear lockout, auxiliary trans- cooler, turbo hydromatic Automatic Overdrive mission 400 or equivalent Transmission. — 6. Generating System alternator, 90 amp, minimum yen 7. Battery 4000 watt minimum 3nlirp Specia 71 AMP H.D. 8. Rear Axle heavy duty Police T_voe 9. Differential locking differential _ Yes 10. Brakes power, disc, front, semi, metallic lining Yes 11. Springs front and rear heavy duty wes _ 12. Tires first line four -ply tubeless, steelbelted radial P225-70, 15 inch Ye__ a---- 13. Frame full frame construction from front to rear Pull Bodv on Frame Constrai 14. Steering power Yea 15. Seatinq bench, heavy duty, also heavy duty front seat frame with full depth padding,(cloth) Yes 16. Color light blue Yes 17. Accessory Equipment A. air conditioner with high pressure, high temperature automatic cutout Yee B. cwu spotlights, iridt-lled Fy dealer, 4 inch sealed beams, 4" left and right 51 or 6" not C. fresh air -hot water heater with defroster attachment yal D. front and rear bumper guards Yes E, dual rear tail lights and stop lights, parking and tail lights to be flashing yes F. heavy duty shock obsorbers Yes r G. instrument panel, standard grouping _Yea— H, front ashtray and lighter vex s _ Accessory Equipment continued 1. speedumeter - must be accurate to within 2: of all spends to 100 MPII and shall indicate speed in five or less miles per hour divisions, needle type indicator , Yes—� J. rearview mirror, day and night type Yes K. sway bar, heavy duty type _Yes L. oil pressure gauge Engine lite type if-need-l"auge•req. add M, amp meter, numeral lighted Yes $49.0 N. dash -controlled trunk release Yee - Glove Box loc. 0. interior hood release Yee P. trunk light - to light when trunk opens Yes _ Q. standard AM radio Yes R. rear window defogger Yes S. tinted glass throughout Yes T. remote left and right hand exterior mirrors Yee U. intermittent windshield wipers Yes V. tilt wheel Requires lst gear lockout to be deleted, Yea W. Power doorlocks Yes X. (option) heavy duty bucket seats (cloth) If reauj red please add $108.00. The detailed specifications forms shall be completed by answering "yes" or "no" in the provided blanks and by providing a detail for each item of the model, type (or where necessary), a description of what is to be provided. This additional information shall be attached to the detailed specification form. f FORD LTD CROWN VICTORIA S rVll<c t x.r�ns.+yxs 1984 Ford Police Packages are offered on the LTD Crown Victoria S 4-Door Sedan with either the 5.0 liter EFI (302 CID) or 5.8 liter HO VVf351 C10) V-8 engines and includes the following equipment: Alternator. 80-Amp 1100-Amp with 5.8L HO engine) Battery. 71-AmpiHour (CCA 475 Amps) Heavy -Duty (maintenance -free) • Brakes. Heavy -Duty Power Front Disc%Rear Drum (semi -metallic front disc pads,, flaredr and gruuved 11 irich rear drums:,,, .J. cooling with organic linings) • Cooling. Police Level Heavy -Duty Package. including Viscous Fan. Coolant. Recovery System and Unique Police Radiator • Decklid Release, Remote -Control Electric in Glove Box • Frame. Heavy -Duty • Handling Package. Maximum Police includes — Extra -heavy-duty, high -rate front and rear springs — Heavy-duty upsized front and rear shock absorbers — Heavy-duty front and rear police stabilizer bars — Steel upper control arm bushings and upper ball joints and special lower control arm bushings • Heat Shield, Battery . Hubeaos. Briaht • Map ugnl, uuai ebam • oil Cooler, External Auxilliary Transmission • P225/70R15 BSW Police Special Fabric Radial Tires with Conventional Spare Tire • Parking Brake Release, Automatic • Power Steering, Forward Mounted Oil Cooler • Radio, AM • Seat, Heavy -Duty Front Flight Bench Non -Reclining with Cloth and Vinyl Trim Single -Key Locking System, Keyed Differently • Speedometer. Calibrated (0.140 MPH In 2 MPH increments; 0.220 KM/Hr in 5 KM Increments) • Transmisslon,Automatic Overdrive ilh Integral Flnt Gear Lock-0ut (PRN D2) • wheels. Heaw•DuN 15 x 8.5" Sele Rim Roomy and Practical for Police and Emergency Needs file LT D Crown Victoria S 4-Door Sedan offers heel buyers lull -size and comfort plus many basic quality features —but at a lower once Slandard features such as halogen headlamps. 5 0 liter EFI (302 CID) V-8 engine with electronic engine controls (EEC w). automatic overdrive transmission. power steering and goner front disc. rear drum brakes all add up to make the LTD Crown Victoria S a very attractive buy A. t_._J r— S.......w JTQflClaru rtr.UIUIC3 In addition to those items specified for the Police Packages, the 1984 LTD Crown Victoria S has many features that contribute to comfort and/or convenience during the time spent on the road. Solid Roomy Body �T/ V The body -on -frame construction provides a solid platform for mounting chassis components that combine to deliver a quiet ride. The LTD Crown Vicctoria S can provide plenty of roomy comfort inside for six adults. Responsive Suspension A compuler•Wned suspension system is a major reason for the Smooth ride of a Crown Victoria S. Up front Is a shod and long arm (SLA) design with low friction ball joints. At .a, the rear is a compact 4•01111' jinx design wim rear shocks mounted forward of the rear axle for an efficient suspension. Sound Insulation Sound insulation surrounds the LTD Crown Victoria S passenger compartment —setting up effective barriers against to and trallic noise trial can affect working efficiency on cite too. Advanced Front Seat Design The standard front seat for 1984 is a flight bench design with a fold -down center armrest. The heavy-duty front seat design helps assure working comfort the whole shift. Molded - foam padding for comfort combines with a steet Flex-0•Lator" spring mat for firm support— especially under the thighs. The LTD Crown Victoria S driver -center provides an instrument cluster that reads at a glance... expansive glass areas ... and live prime operating controls at fingertip convenience on twin column•mounled control stalks. DureSpark Ignition System Ford'a DuraSpark Solld State Ignition System provides a high-vollage spark• eliminates the conventional CCdints and condenser and extends spar plug life. The electronic voltage regulator has no moving pans. CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW 1 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA SESSION January 16, 1984 7:00 p.m. 1. Discussion of recent changes in Newsletter delivery methods th- ^tati.cs WL Lll LIM DUY JI.V"' a�pres..0 2. Interview of police Civil Service Commission Applicants: 7:30 p.m. Lloyd J. Blanchard 7:45 p.m. Charlynn J. Blackstone 8:00 P.M. Gordon J. Fedor 8:15 p.m. Robert E. Toborg 8:30 p.m. Jacqulyn S. Saunders 3. Consideration of staff memorandum regarding Fire Department correspondence. 4. Consideration of an ordinance establishing a Special Projects Fund. 5. Consideration of staff memorandum regarding Burger King. 6. Consideration of memorandum from the Finance Director regarding the City Attorney's opinion on qualifying uses of residual MST Construction monies. 7. Consideration of staff memorandum regarding day care facilities. 8. Consideration of request for expenses on sewer service installa- tion at 2581/83 County Road I. (Material to be handed out Monday.) 9. Consideration of deposit release for John Mezzenga for 7280 Silver Lake Road. (Material to be handed out Monday.) MEMO TO: Mounds View City Council FROM: Itruce K. Anderson, I)irector parks, Recreation and Forestry DATE: January 12, 1984 RE: City Newsletter. Delivery System It is my understanding that the City Council has set a meeting with local boy scout troop 400 and staff to review our current delivery system for the City Newsletter.. I have attached a copy of staff's memorandum dated November 23, 1983 as well as corres- pondence to Sharon Anderson dated December 5 and Nancy Gollnick dated December 15 clarifying the City of Mounds View's position regarding the City Newsletter delivery. Staff would still maintain that the recommendation in the memor- andum dated November 23, 1983 to go with the post office delivery at a rate of 7.4T per newsletter as per the routes outlined, is the most economical and efficient way for delivering the City Newsletter. Staff feels that the major controversy that has arisen over this issue centers around my handling of the local boy scout troop re- garding the this proposed change. Staff did not involve the boy scout troop in this decision making process and unfortunately, has unintentionally alienated the troop supervisors. Staff's reason for not involving the boy scouts in the decision was two- fold. The first being that the decision was not necessarily a negotiable item from staff's perspective; and secondly, staff had perceived an incorrect perception that the boy scouts weren't all that enamored with delivering the City Newsletter. I will state once again, as I outlined in my letter dated Decem- ber 15, 1983 to Nancy Gollnick, that it was not staff's position to change carriers due to poor service, but rather that we felt that we could get an improved delivery system by going with the post office due to consistent location and delivery times for all City residents. Staff further would agree that I did not ade- quately inform the boy scouts of some of the concerns that had evolved over the hand delivering of newsletters, as they were not of such a serious consequence that major steps for change had to be made but rather that there were inconsistenciesin delivery dates and times for specific areas as well as varied locations as to where the newsletters were placed. Staff's ofiginal recommendation to go with the boy scouts or lo- cal civic organization was based mainly on cost effectiveness as well as timeliness. It appears that now both of these items can be addressed by the local postal delivery system as the cost has been reduced to 7.4t and we would no longer need to purchase the plastic bags to place the newsletters in. -2- In conclusion, staff once again maintains that the recommendation that was made to deliver the City Newsletter through the third class carrier pre-sort at an individual cost of 7.4t per delivery to the seven routes as outlined on the attached map, would he the best route to go. Regarding how the remaining 300 newsletters would be delivered would be up to the Council's discretion. once again, staff will be on hand to discuss this issue at greater length on Monday evening and should you have any questions prior to Monday, feel free to contact me directly at 784-3055, ext. 041. BKA/sll Attachments V MI.1Mo 'ro: Mounds View City Council i'ROM: Bruce K. Anderson, Dire t� J Parks, Recreation and il r DATE: November 21, 19113 RE: City Newsletter Delivery System As you are aware, the City has been delivering the newsletter on a bi-monthly basis through the local services of Roy Scout Troop #400. Prior to utilizing the local boy scout troop, we utilized a number of systems including postal delivery, the Independent Delivery System, and the Mounds View Swim Club. During the past year, we have experienced a number of problems with our City Newsletter delivery system and staff has been actively reviewing our previous methods as well as meeting with the local postal service to determine how we might modify and best use regular mail delivery. The major problems that we have had with the Boy Scouts during the past two years has been inconsistent delivery from both a time perspective as well as residential home areas being missed. But more important than the inconsistent delivery is the fact that the newsletters were often left outside to face the elements as well as in different locations for the residents to find their newsletter. The cost for utilizing the boy scouts was 51/copy based on 4,201) newsletters or $210 per. delivery. The Independent Delivery System that we utilized for a four month period was similar to the boy scouts as they delivered newsletters door to door a 5�/copy also. The consistancy and quality of deliveries with the Independent Delivery System was better than the local boy scout troop but we did not receive the obvious community -wide benefits from utilizing youth serving organizations. Based on our experience with four different delivery systems, staff would propose that we return to using the postal service by utilizing the third class carrier route pre-sort postal rate. By using this method, we are able to get a 7.4�/copy delivery rate which has gone down .9� from the past year. Staff has met with the postmasters of both Fridley and New Brighton during the past week and reviewed the specific routes that are delivered in Mounds View. By mailing to the seven routes as per the attached sheet, we can deliver newsletters to all the residential, commercial and business properties within the City of Mounds View excluding the shaded areas on the attached maps. The total number of post office deliveries will be 4,435 mailings. 19e still will have to deliver approximately 275 newsletters to Spring Lake Park residents in order to hit the remaining 420 Mounds View residents on Fridley route #3204. Staff feels that this can be justified from the standpoint that there is some involvement in our recreation programs from Spring Lake Park and their close proximity makes City information relevent. -2- Staff would further recommend that the remaining 280 residents sincluded in the shaded area would be delivered by the Civil Air trol at $35.00/newsletter delivery or approximately 12.5�/copy. Staff feels that the increased money is justified as the deliveries are spread throughout the City. By working with the Civil Air Patrol to hand deliver the shaded areas, we eliminate 1,011 deliveries outside the city limits. By utilizing this delivery system, the total cost to the City will be $1,969.00 for U.S. Postal mail delivery plus $210.00 to the Civil Air Patrol or a total of $2,179.00. Staff has budgeted $2,290.00 for delivery of the City Newsletter in 1984, so we would be approximately $110.00 under budget. In addition to being within the City budget, staff feels that service and delivery will be improved through the post office as well as the utilization of the mail boxes. It should also be noted that the City Newsletter totals for printing this year were increased to 4,600 which would leave the City staff approximately 165 newsletters available for general distribution to City residents. Although this is really not an adequate amount, staff feels that we would be able to make due with this small problem and that the system as proposed would best serve the City residents. RECOMMENDATION To deliver the City Newsletter through the third class carrie route pre-sort at an individual cost of 7.4� per delivery to the seven routes as prescribed excluding the shaded areas which would be delivered by the Civil Air Patrol at a cost of $35.00 per delivery. BKA/S11 woo... wf ,d +we ea AYw Mee Y,peN w • w r r u u+c sand W[ FM 114 e NEW BRIGHTON POST OFFICE (55112) Route N 1209 - 569 1206 - 633 1223 - 790 FRIDLEY POST OFFICE (55432) Route 4 3203 - 557 3204 - 694 3222 - 645 3226 - 547 � I ! C►�� 0��11 J (V� nrr., � � rnrq•r t, Idlt:Nl .ell. GATfR'AY TO T11E NORTH M1IIP INv .: d W, IAIBt: YOU 1114 110. . Il•-1•Irmher 5, 1483 Ms. Sharon Audlrrson 5540 linna Road tit. Paul, M0.4 55112 [)ear Sharon: This is just a short note to follow up on our phone conversation on Thursday, Doeemher, 1, 14113 regarding the delivery of the City Nuwsletlel' for 1984. As l indicated, the Mounds View City Council reviewed our current procedure for delivering the newsletter, at their regularly scheduled meeting on Tuesday, �• icovember 29 and dirrcled staff to work with the local post office �.' for delivery in 1984. 'rnoir major rationale for: working with the post office was to utilize the mail boxes as well as improving our coverage to the .apartment complexes and other rental properties. As I indicated, there still were a number of: areas we will he delivering by hand as the existing mail carrier route system does not hit every home in Mounds View. Once the Linal dotails of the routes are worked out, I will he in touch to see if your group might he interested in delivering the few remaining homes. on behalf of the Mounds View City Council, T would like to take this opportunity Lo thank you and your- Lroop'men,bers for the oxcellent job they (lid accomplish during the past year and I look forward to possibly working with you and the troop on future projects. Should you have any questions regarding the new City De'wslotter deliv,try system, feel free to give me a call directly at 711d-3055, ext. 441. , Sincerely, A liruce K. Ando 'L.,,'DireCLOr Park:;, Roereftion and forestry BKA/sll GATEWAY 1 TO THE NORTH OLPARTMLNT OI PARKS. III CIA I'AT InN ANO fO Ri !.I n': Uecember 15, 1983 Cif 0f vouhjS 4 HA,ASL Y COUNI Y, MINNESOT A 2401 HIGHWAY 10 MOUNDS VIEW. MINN. 55117 784.3055 Mrs. Nancy Gcllnick 8085 Greenwood Ave. Minneapolis, MN 55432 Dear Mrs. Gollnick: It has been called to my attention that you had raised some con— cerns regarding the City Council's recent decision to go with the post office for delivery of the 1984 City Newsletter. As can be noted in the enclosed staff report, it was staff's recommendation to go with the post office due to the more consistent delivery as well as utilization of the mail boxes. It was not staff's posi— tion that we had problems newsletter the hand delivery as much off office is we feel the delivery of p an improved service. The cost difference between delivering the newsletter by hand and by utilizing the post office is minimal as we no longer need to utilize plastic bags for City delivery. As I indicated to Sharon Anderson in the attached letter, we are greatly appreciative of the services of the local boy scout troop and look forward to making use of your troop's civic mindedness on future projects. Should you have any questions regarding the City's position on this issue, feel free to contact me directly at 784-3055, ext. 141. Sin erely, /!u Bruce K. Ande Parks, Recrea DKA/sll one Director on and Forestry cc: Mayor Duane McCarty MEMO TO: Mayor and City CO \ FROM: Clerk-Administrat DATE: January 3, 1984 SUBJECT: FIRE DEPARTMENT CORRESPONDENCE Attached please find a letter received o ytthishe office from e city Fire Chief Ron Fagerstrom providing a copy ordinance which provides for the charging of costs incurred by the city for extinguishing fires resulting from the acts of individuals who are neither a resident of the city nor an owner of real property in the city which is subject to real estate property taxes. Chief Fagerstrom, suggesting not thatstating citysuch consider the adoption er, is more than likely Bugg 9 •\, of such an ordinance which, at face value, has some merit. Just recently the Fire Department was called out on a vehicle fire at the intersection of County Road ii and Old Highway 8. The owner of that vehicle is not a resident nor a property owner in the City of Mounds View, however, the cost of fighting such a fire can be considered to have been subsidized by the taxpayers of Mounds View through our contract with the Fire Department. �. It was my`experience f r throt-ire tion services e City Of ltoerural eareas our rthat uepartnen6 pro'_ c e F- when the Department billed the property aideforfor theselexpensesey the property owners insurance company p RECOMMENDATION: Authorize staff to develop an ordinance similar to the City of New Hope's, with the assistance of the Fire Chief and City Attorney Meyers. DFP/Pf Attachment r HEADQUARTERS 1810 Highway 10 Spring Lake Park, Minnesota 55432 December 28, 1983 City of hounds View Attn: Donald F. Pauley 2401 Highway 10 st, Paul, Minnesota 55112 Dear Don: At a recent meeting of the Legislative COMMittce, Bill Reimers, the new Hope fire chief, stated that his city had been billing persons, who are not subject to real property taxes in the city, for car/ vehicle fires. Attached hereto is a copy of their ordinance which has been in effect for over twelve years, If you would be interested in this concept, I would he happy to work with you in developing a similar ordinance for Mounds View, nF/js Attachment 1 Yours very truly, kill , one F gcr rom Chief of epartment ORDINANCE NO, 71-16 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 9.09 OF THE VILLAGE CODE RELATING TO COLLECTION OF COSTS INCURRED IN EXTINGUISHING FIRES THE VILLAGE: COUNCIL OF THE Village of New Hope ordains; Section 1. Chapter 9 of the Village Code is hereby amended by adding thereto Section 9.09 to read as follows: "'j N Oil \" Section 9.09.Fire Control CostsV. �Every person, firm or corporation that •` ,,�' is, not a resident of the Village or the w owner of real property -in the•Village subject . Y` td real property taxes, shall be liable br all expenses incurred by the Village 1 Iut/) \ 14� fighting or preventing the spread o£, q� p Pecord ' extinguishing any fire caused by or •1?� sulting £rom his or its acts, negligence omissions. The -Fire Chief shall keep a I of the cost, including work done ?N by volunteer firemen and other Village ,•' employees and equipment, and file the . same with the Clerk -Treasurer. Thereupon, the Clerk -Treasurer shall bill the person, fire, or corporation liable therefor, as . above provided. No license of any person, firm or corporation liable. for the expenses incurred in fire control as provided above, shall he renewed if the licensee is in default in payment of any bill hereunder.' Section 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect —From a-R—after its passage and publication. Passed by the Village Council of the Village of Now !lope this -7-'7 day of 5Epr , 1971, '—" rYor Attest: Published in the New Ilope-Plymouth Post , 1971. 0 4 t, ORDINANCE NO. ROUGH DRAFT CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE. OF MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND The Council of the City of Mounds View does hereby ordain: SECTION I. Definitions Capital Improvement Projects. Projects which are intended to acquire, construct, permanently modify or purchase assets of long term character which are intended to continue to be held or used, such as land, buildings and machinery. Emergency. An emergency is an occurrence where the public health, safety, and welfare is jeopardized, where immediate action is necessary, and must be declared by a 4/5 vote of the entire Council. Enterprise Fund. A fund established to finance and account for the acquisition, operation, and maintenance of govermental facilities which are entirely or predominantly self-supporting by user charges. Examples of enterprise funds are those for water, sewer, gas, and electric utilities, swimming pools, airports, parking garages, and transit systems. Equipment. Tangible property of a more or less permanent nature, other than land, buildings, or improvements other than buildings, which is useful in carrying on operations. Examples are machinery, trucks, cars, furniture, and furnishings. General Government Maintenance Expenses. Costs incurred for the upkeep of physical properties in condition for uses or occupancy which are used in the rendering of services traditionally associated with municipal government as distinguished from those provided by municipal enterprise operations. General Government Operating Expenses. Costs which are necessary to the rendering of services traditionally associated with municipal government as distinguished from those provided by municipal enterprise operations. Public Improvement Projects. Public improvement projects as defined in Chapter 26 of the Code. special Assessment Fund. A fund set up to finance and account for the construction of improvements or provision of services which are to be paid for, wholly or in part, from special assessments levied against benefitted property. SECTION II. Special Projects Fund Established: PURPOSE There is hereby established and created a separate and special fund designated as the Special Projects Fund, which the Clerk -Administrator and Finance Director -Treasurer shall maintain on the official accounting records and financial statements of the City and administer in accordance with this ordinance. This fund may be used to make interest hearing loans to finance public improvement projects authorized pursuant to Chapter 26 of. the Code or to make interest bearing loans to finance equipment purchases and/or capital improvement projects of any City enterprise fund. This fund may also be used to make permanent transfers for the purchase of equipment and/or to finance capital improvement projects of any City fund except special assessment and enterprise funds. In no event shall this fund he used to finance current and recurring general government maintenance expenses. This fund may be used to make permanent transfers to the fund balance of the General Fund to ensure that there exists a cash flow reserve and a reserve for contingencies. The amounts of said reserves shall be determined by the City Council. This fund may also be used to make emergency repairs to the public utility system, City streets and highways, municipal buildings, and machinery and equipment in the event that monies for said repairs have not been previously budgeted and/or that sufficient monies are not available for said repairs from other sources. In the event that the emergency repairs needed are to assets accounted for in the Water Fund, Sewer Fund, or any City I' enterprise fund the monies for said repairs shall be in the form of an interest bearing loan. At the option of the Council monies used for repairs, to assets accounted for in other funds, may be in the form of interest bearing loans or permanent transfers. It shall be used for no other purpose and any monies on deposit in the fund may be invested in accordance with provisions of the City Charter and with applicable Minnesota Statutes. SECTION III. Funds To Be Deposited Therein There shall be deposited in said fund the initial sum of $ which represents the cash balance remaining in the Improvement Bond Redemption Fund after the cash defeasance of that fund's outstanding bonds. The special assessments receivable of the Improvement Bond Redemption Fund shall be transferred to said fund and hereafter all future payments of principal and interest on those assessments shall be deposited in the fund. There may also be deposited in said fund such other monies as may be directed by the Council. SECTION IV. Use of Funds Upon the adoption of a resolution by 4/5 of the entire Council, monies of the fund may be used for the purposes stated in Section II above. In the event of an interest bearing loan the resolution authorizing said loan shall state the amount of the loan, its purpose, term, interest rate, and method of repayment. In the event of the purchase of equipment or the financing of capital improvement projects, the authorizing resolution shall state the amount of the purchase or financing, shall contain a description of the equipment or project, and shall designate the fund to which the monies are to be transfered. In the event of emergency repairs the authorizing resolution shall state the nature of the repairs, the amount needed for said repairs and shall designate the fund to which the monies are to be transferred. The authorizing resolution shall also state that monies for said emergency repairs had not previously been budgeted and that sufficient monies are not available from other sources to finance said emergency repairs. In the event of a permanent transfer to the fund balance of the General Fund the authorizing resolution shall state the amount of the transfer and shall indicate whether said transfer is designated for the cash flow reserve or the reserve for contingencies. TO: Mayor L Council FROM: Finance Director -Treasurer 1 DATE: January 12, 1984 RE: PROPOSED ORDINANCEESTABLISHING A SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND Attached for your consideration is a proposed ordinance establishing a Special Projects Fund. It is proposed that the cash balance, re- maining in the Improvement Bond Redemption Fund after the cash de- feasance of that fund's bonds, be initially deposited in this Special Projects Fund. Also the special assessments receivable of the Improve- ment Bond Redemption Fund would be transferred to the Special Projects Fund and all future payments of principal and interest on those assess- ments would be deposited in the Fund. Future bonded debt tax levies would have to be cancelled since the cash defeasance will ensure that the bonds will be paid and as a consequence the tax levy will no longer be needed. In drafting this proposed ordinance I kept several considerations in mind. The first consideration was for the cash flow needs of the General Fund. As a result of the cash defeasance the City's overall cash and investment balances will be dramatically reduced. Approximate- ly $2.6 million will be used to purchase investments which will be given to an escrow agent who will use those monies to pay the scheduled bond principal and interest payments of the Improvement Bond Redemption Fund as they come due. Those monies will no longer be available to meet the General Fund's cash flow needs. Therefore, the proposed ordinance allows permanent transfers of monies to the fund balance of the General Fund in order that sufficient cash is available in that fund to pay for current operations from January 1 until the end of ttlement—Iceived from Fiamspy r.nilnty. July when Cue tax se,.��=..��.... �s �.- The second consideration is that the City continue, as we have in the past, to "live within our means". We have always limited current operating expenditures to the amount of estimated current revenues and achieved a balanced budget in the General and Forestry Funds. The Water, Sewer and Recreation Activity Funds have been self supporting; their expenditures have been limited to anticipated current revenues. Therefore, the proposed ordinance allows the purchase of equipment and the financing of capital improvement projects only for the General and Forestry Funds. Since the Water, Sewer and Recreation Activity Funds are to be self supporting, only interest bearing loans are to be made to those funds. Current and recurring operating and maintenance expenditures would not be allowed under this proposed ordinance. By limiting this fund's expenditures to the purchase of equipment and the financing of capital improvements only for the General and Forestry Funds the City will be able to continue its policy of "living within its means" while also providing for the future purchase of needed equipment and capital improvements at no additional burden to the tax- payer. While it is not in the proposed ordinance, it is strongly re- commended that monies be used only for the purchase of those items of Page 2 January 12, 1994 equipment and/or capital improvements which are contained in the Lon; / Term Financial Plan. Requiring that items be included in the Long Term Financial Plan will ensure that items financed by the fund will have been subjected to a careful review by both staff and Council. Further items so financed will be those which are necessary to achieve the long range goals and objectives of the City as contained in the Plan. In summary, the proposed ordinance provides that a Special Projects Fund be established with the cash balance remaining in the Improvement Bond Redemption Fund after the bonds in that Fund have been defeased. Monies in the Fund may be used for the following purposes: 1) interest bearing loans to finance public improvement projects or to finance purchases of equipment and/or capital improvements of the Water, Sewer and Recreation Activity Funds 2) to purchase equipment and/or finance capital improvements of any City funds except special assessment and enterprise funds 3) to make permanent transfers to the fun.] balance of the General Fund 4) to make emergency repairs The proposed ordinance requires a resolution of 4/5 of all the members of the Council to authorize use of the monies in the Fund. During past discussions of possible uses of the monies that will be available to the City after the defeasance, a transfer to the fund balance of the General Fund and an interest bearing loan to the Improve- ment Bonds of 1981 Bond Fund were mentioned. Pursuant to terms of the proposed ordinance such uses would have to be authorized by resolution. Therefore, I am proposing a resolution be adopted immediately after the ordinance is adopted authorizing the first uses of some of the monies of the Special Projects Fund. The first use proposed is a permanent transfer to the fund balance of the General Fund. Our auditors have recommended that, for cash flow requirements, our fund balance be one-half the sum of the budgeted tax levy and local government aid. For 1984 that is approximately $630,000. Presently the fund balance is $392,000; this is $238,000 short of the minimum amount recommended. In their management report dated December 31, 1982 (p. 22) our auditor's stated that cash flow requirements are only one of several reasons for maintaining General Fund revenues. Other reasons are unanticipated or emergency expend- itures and reductions in shared intergovernmental aids received from the Federal and State Governments. During 1982 the City experienced a reduction of aid received from the State of Minnesota of approxima ly $80,000. While the timing of those aid reductions were such that Page 3 January 12, 1984 we were ons sorb se ductionsaweeto may notehave�Jthat timeet cinithe futureuandbthus wleomayre- loose our ability to make budget modifications. Addi.tionalncy lyufuture reductions corwouldsevere. allowAusetorabsorb thoseve for ereductions and ticipated expenditures future budgets and preserve the well being give ample time to modify of our residents. Additionally City operations are so diverse that financial flexibility unex is required to handle unforseen events. Natural disasters, capital outlay reeufinancinyaon arcurrenteliminarandltimelyfnancingbasisor vital im- proveme ts is interst A secondary benefit of adequate fund balance roffsetsthe costseOf in- come. Such income would be available to help current operations. e of the In order to maintain the financial ialsnsfertofaan additionalnd c$100,000 General Fund, special be made to the fund balance of the General Fund from the Projects Fund. This amount would be designated as a reserve for. contingencies and would be used in the event of reductions of State Aids, unforseen events and emergencies. I am not recommending an interest bearing loan be made to the Improve- ment Bonds of 1981 Bond Fund. In their most recentregardingmanagementheet letter our auditors recommended obtaining a legal op' qualifying uses of residual MSA constructi n monie monies lmust the iAaal opinion from our City Attorney, those sary that monies uses would be a loan be restricted, however, one of the p- to the bond fund. As a consequence it is not neces of the proposed Special Projects Fund be used for these bonds. A u will be receiving along with this one will separate memo that yo explain the City Attorney's opinion in more detail. RECOMMENDATION: projects Fund and Adopt the proposed ordinance establishing a Special direct staff to prepare a resolution authorizing the transfer of $338,000 from the Special Projects Fund to the fund balance of the General Fund. DB/ds Attachment rMEMO TO: Clerk -Administrator and City Council FROM: Engineering/Planning Technician FJr DATE: January 12, 1984 SUBJECT: BURGER KING The Burger King development proposal is once again coming before the City Council for review on January 16, 1984. Both Mr. Bill Ranek of the Burger King Corporation and Mr. Jim Benshoof of Benshoof and Associates (Traffic Engineers) will once again be in attendance to answer any question you may have. To reiterate, this proposal is seeking the following approvals: 1. A minor subdivision (1 lot into 2) 2. A rezoning from its present I-1 use to B-3, Highway Commercial 3. A conditional use permit for the operation of a convenience food establishment in a B-3 district 4. An amendment to the original P.U.D. which was approved for the Silver I,ake Woods development 5. Development Agreement - Language to be included in the development agreement should relate to County Road I improvements, specifically as it relates to the second curb cut being proposed. Should the Burger King development be approved, some indication should be given to staff as to the scheduling of improvements for County Road I. Perhaps this may be delayed until a new Director of Public Works/Community Development is on board. Should you have any questions regarding this item, please contact me. FJK/bC �J Mayor & Council Director -Treasurer CITY ATTORNEY'S OPINION ON QUALIFYING USES OF RESIDUAL MSA CONSTRUCTION MONIES During 1982 Mounds View Drive, a street located within the Silver Lake Woods Improvment Project, was designated as a Municipal State Aid street, Subsequently MSA construction monies were received for acquisition and construction even though an assessment was levied against benefitted properties for the street. The receipt of MSA construction monies under such circumstances is allowable under alicable rasand sdusesof regulations fundshe Commission of Tnsportationgoverningthe In anticipation of the receipt of MSA monies for Mounds View Drive, a resolution was adopted establishing a Special Capital Projects Fund. When the MSA monies for Mounds View Drive were received they were deposited in this fund. In their management report dated December 31, 1982 (p. 28-29) our auditors recommended that prior to expending any monies of this fund a legal opinion regarding the qualifying uses of residual MSA construct- ion monies be obtained. I requested and have received such an opinion from the City Attorney. The City Attorney roojsshouldhis be creditedttocthe)Silverthat tLake WoodsMSA monies received for the project Imvrovements Project Fund. If, after all construction costs of the Project have been paid, there remains a. monies in the construction fund, those monies may be transferred to the Improvement Bonds of 1981 Bond Fund or said monies may be used to pay the cost in whole or in part of any other improvement instituted pursuant to Chapter 26.04. In discussing this matter with the City Attorney I was advised that the resolution adopting the Special Capital Projects Fund should be repealed and that the MSA monies in the Fundshouldbe transferred to 9 the the construction fund. As of November 30, , Special Capital Projects Fund was $436,238.29. The City Attorney further advised that once these monies were in the Project's construct - fund it ofart thosemonieslto the d be a DondeFunduse orotoemakeeatloantransfer the Bond Fund. As a consequence of these MSA monies being placed in the Project's construction fund, sufficient monies are available to transfer or loan to the Bond Fund should the Bond Fund experience any future cash flow mmendation is to leave the monies in problems. At this point my reco the construction fund so as to maintain maximum flexibility in future uses of those monies. Page 2 January 12, 1984 RECOMMENDATION: Council direct staff to write a proposed resolution abolishing the Special Capital Projects Fund and transferring the residual NSA monies contained in that Fund to the Silver Lake Woods Project construction fund pursuant to the opinion of the City Attorney. DB/ds Attachment 0 0 7 MEMO TO: Clerk -Administrator and City Council FROM: Lngineering/Planning Technician IJ DATE: January 12, 1984 SUBJECT: DAY CARE FACILITIES At the January 3, 1984 Agenda Meeting, the City Council directed staff to review state and county regulations regarding day care facilities and how they relate to the existing City Code. Attached to this memo is information that City, county and state classifications as they explains current facilities and residential facilities (see relate to day care attached State Statutes for definitions), also recommended changes to Chapter 40. These changes have been reviewed by the City Attorney. Basically, language is being introduced to bring our Code into conformance with State Statutes which requires day care facilities, licensed, with ten or fewer children and residential facilities, licensed, with six or fewer children to be permitted uses in an R-1 district. Language which also has been introduced places other classifications as conditional uses in an R-2 district. Parking language has also been reviewed. I will be present at your agenda meeting to answer any questions you may have regarding this matter. rJlc/hc EXISTING CITY CLASSIFICATIONS Hoarding home - foster. children - Restricted to a family dwelling 24 hour care 5 child limit Permitted in R-1 Day care home - Restricted to a family dwelling Less than 24 hour care 5 child limit Permitted in R-2 Day care - group nursery Not restricted to a family dwelling Less than 24 hour care No child limit C.U.P. in R-2 EXISTING COUNTY CLASSIFICATIONS d Family day care No training and/or experience required Maximum of 5 children under age 6 County license required Group family day care Training and/or experience required Maximum of 10 children (6-10) under age 6 County license required Day care center - licensed by county and state STATE CLASSIFICATIONS Day care facility Residential facility Day care facility, licensed Residential facility, licensed t f CLASSIVICA'PION COMPARISONS Personnel C� CnunU R ulremrnt ' day care. home family day care no other person required day care - group group family licensed person nursery day care required day care - group day care center licensed person nursery required *State Statutes (245.812, Subd. 3) states that a licensed day care facility serving ten or fewer persons shall be considered a permitted single family residential use. iy CHANGES PROPOSED R-1 Permitted Use Delete 40.10, Subd. H(2) Delete 40.10, Subd. H(3) New 40.10, Subd. H(2): 14 Day care facility (Non -licensed, 5 or less persons, including the family's own chiid[en) Residential facility (Non -licensed, 5 or less persons, including the family's own children) Day care facility, licensed (10 or less persons, including the family's own children) Residential facility, licensed (6 or less persons, including the family's own children) a. Persons which are employed to meet County and State licensing regulations shall be permitted on the premises b. All County and State regulations and licensing procedures have been adhered to J - 2 - 11-2 Conditional Use Delete 40.11, Subd. E(2) ,/"% New 40.11, Subd. E(2) ilit y (non -licensed) serving 6 or more A day care fac persons, a residential facility (non -licensed) serving 6 or more persons, a day care facility, licensed, and oesmorrt11ed under. Mn. Statutes 245.702, Subd. 5, serving persons or a residential facility, licensed, and as defined under Mn. Statutes 245.782, Subd. h, serving 7 or more persons provided that: a. The front yard depth shall be a minimum of thirty (30) feet. b. Not less than forty (40) square feet of outside playspace per child shall be provided and that such space be suitably fenced and/or screenedhin accordance with conditions as may be specified by Y nc c. Adequate off-street parking and access is provided in compliance with Section 40.07 of the Code. d. Adquate off-street loading and service entrances are provided in compliance with Section 40.00 of this Code. e. The site and related parking and service shall be served by an arterial or collector street of sufficient capacity to accommodate the traffic which will be generated. inal or ual ction f. rmat dAll evices nshall ing nbelin compliance with sthe moundsViewsign Code (Chapter 39). g. The provision of Section 40.25, Subd. A(5) of this Code are considered and satisfactorily met. h. pAll County antate rocedures haveSregulations and licensing been adheredto Persons which are employedto meet to bCounty and Stateslicensing regulations shall be p R-3 Permitted Uses Delete 40.12, Subd. B(4) and (5). (These are already permitted uses in an R-1 district and so would be a permitted use in an R-3 district.) - 3 - 40.07, Subd. H ( 2 ) Delete boarding hnuse, add residential facility (non -licensed) serving 6 or more persons, residentie) facility, licensed, serving 7 or more persons, 40.07, Subd. II(13) Delete day nursery, add day care facility (non -licensed) serving 6 or more persons, day care facility, licensed, serving 11 or more persons. NEW DEFINITIONS Day Care Facility, A facility as defined under Mn. Statutes 245.782, Subd. 5. Residential Facility, A facility as defined under Mn. Statutes 245.782, Subd. 6. Residential Facility, Licensed. A facility as defined under Mn. Statutes 245.782, Subd. 6, as regulated by Mn. Statutes 245.812, Subd. 3. Day Care Facility, Licensed. A facility as defined under Mn. Statutes 245.782, Subd. 5, as regulated by Mn. Statutes 245.812, Subd. 3. Deleted Definitions (23) Day care - home (24) Day care - group nursery What will these changes do? 1. Allows a day care facility (including the county's designation of family day care and group family day care) as a permitted use in an R-1 district because of State Statute. A day care facility allows up licensed or 5 children if not than 24 hour care, to 10 children (if state state licensed) for less than 2. Allows a residential facility as a permitted use in an R-1 district. A residential facility allows up to 6 children (if state licensed or 5 children if not state licensed) for 24 hour care. 3. Changes the Home Occupation section to allow a person who does not reside on the premises to work in a group family day care facility or residential facility and not be in violation of the Home Occupation section of the Code. - 4 - 71 4, Allows day care facilities, licensed (11 or more persons) and residential facilities, lirunsed (7 or more persons) as conditional uses in R-2 districts. 5. Uses new language as it relates to parking requirements. 6. Creates new definitions for day care facility and residential facility. DAY CARE FACILITIES City County State Number of Children * (Revised Zoning Code Language) ------------ '— _ permitted in R-1 no license no license re quired I required license re- license required 2 quired as a family day care 3 4 5 license re- 6 quired as a group family day care 8 9 10 license re- 11 or pore quired in R-2 quired as a day care center * Children from more than one family and including the day care family's own children. 1 through 5 children from the same family would be a permitted use in an R-1 district. 6 and over children from the same family would be a conditional use in an R-2 district. 5- itics, clief dote has iled Red I to flier. are. !an- ave [he the Isis P3, .Ile " Ire d +a• Isis .se- t to 4tc he 4 ng or to ors n• Is, nl in ed ors he 46.11 DEP%ItIMI\ IOF 1'111111C w'FLFAItS U5.9112 PUBLIC WELFARE LICENSING ACf 2.15.781 CI'1AIION. Sections 2•1s.781 III 2.15F,I'_ and 252.28. Suhdivision 2 shall he known as the '•Public welfaw licemin act". F; I lisluq: 1117(11 2.13 .s 2; I.S14911 v 4 art 1 s IM ` 245.7829DEHNI 'f NS. Sulu i%imo , I. for tie purposes of sections 245.781 to 245.1%12 and 252.28, subdivision 2, the folhming terms shall have the me:mim_s given [hem: Subd. 2. "Person" means ;art adult who is handicapped by reason of munhd retardation, mcnl:d illness, chemical dependency, or physical handicap and a child, whetter handicapped or not. Subd. ). "Child" means anyone who has not reached his eighteenth birth- day, Subd. 4. "Agency" means any individual, organir uion, association, or cor. poration which for gain or otherwise regularly provides needed social or counsel- ing services fur persons hiving in their own homes, or receives persons unable to remain in their own hones and places [hem in residential or foster care, or places persons in adoptive homes. "Agency" does not include a local welfare agency or agencies sponsored by community rental hosdtl boards pursuant to section n ` 245.66. "Day care facility" means any facility, public or private, which for { gaui"2tt"ttlienvixc regularly provides one or more persons with care, training. .if E supervision, habilitation, rehabilitation, or developmental guidance on a regular ?;. f basis, for periods of less than 24 hours per day, in a place other than the person's ow•n home. Day care facililies include, but are no[ limited to: family day care homes, group family day cave homes, day rave centers, day nurseries• nursery schn?Is, da time m•Iivity centers, day trca[mcm programs, and day services. fni �. ' .,6� "Itcsidcntial facility" means any facility, public nr private, which �. Uf galil�f 11111erA'Ise regularly provides unc or more persons with it 24 hour per 'a .r day subslitule far care, food, lodging, training, alucation, supen•isinn, habilitation, a� rehabilitation, ;tad trcunuem they need, but which far any reason cannot be furnished in the person own horse. Residential facilities include, but arc not limited to: shoe institutions under the control of the commissioner of public welfare, foster homes, residential treatment centers, maternity shelters, group r homes, residential programs, or schools for handicapped children. S: Subd. 7. "Placing persons in foster care" means placing persons in any of .... .� the following residential facilities: foster home, work home, free home, group h` home, residential treatment center, institution. residential program, or maternity shelter. 11 also means placement in a private hone for the purpose of legal adoption. Subd. S. "Commissioner" means the commissioner of public welfare and ;p includes any duly authorircd representative of the commissioner. { �k•. Subd. 9, "Regularly" or "on x regular basis" means the provision of day 4 y care or residential or agency services lu one or more persons for a cumulative total of more than 30 days within any 12 month period. Subd. 10. "Related" means any of the following relationships by marriage, h9 ;; blood, or adoption: parent, grandparent, brother, sister, step parent, step sister, step brother, uncle, aunt. child, niece, nephew. It shall also include a legally appointed guardian. Subd. 11. "License" means a certificate issued by the commissioner autho- ;r rizing the operator to provide specified services for it specified period of time in 41,36 4637 DFTARIMEN I' OF 1'11111.IC WELFARE 245.312 m If. upon rem+pectioo, it is found lh;tl the operator has ]till cnirected the deficiency of deficiencies specified in the Nncclioll order, (lie operamr may he aeency required w forfeit to the state within 15 daw a aol of up to $250 for aneh lion 2 dcfivlow% not cot iected. A forfeiture urdei nit I,v appe;ded in accordance with ON). the pnncvdure:s sel fords in section 2,15,801. Alf fofciuucs QUIll he paid into the .t the general fund. Any unpmlid forfeitures may he recoveled 11y the attousey general. : and Ilhtury: 1976 c 2•1.1 .a 10 ounis- 245.81 IKCpealed, 1976 c 243 s 151 •ecipt al of 245.811 11•:IS. The Commissioner nuty charge ;I reasonable fee for the issuculcc or renewal I a licenu except that no fee maphe charged to a day, care or residential facility for .oral, the nwnLills retarded. In no event shtdl the fee exceed 5150. Pecs may he waived a1 lire dierrelion of the commissioner. used History: 1976 c 243 s Il -if to y�5.612� 1.0(7XI'I0N AND ZONING. Suhdivisiolt I. No license or provisional license shall be graveled when the any issuance of the license would substantially conlfiluile It) toe excessive concelill'a- lion of residential facilities within any town, municipality or county of [Ile stale. Subd. 2. In determining whether a license shall be issued, the commissioner shall specifically consider the population, size, land use plan, availability of community services and !lie number and size of existing public and private community residential facilities in the town, municipality or Counly in which an I me, applicant seeks to operate n residence. Under too circumstances may the commis - old stoner newly license any group residential facility pursuant to sections 245.781 to the 245.812 and 252.28, subdivision 2 if such residential facility will be within I,320 are 31111 t feel of ally existing group residential facility unless the appropriate town, munici- the facility a conditional use or special use lay pality or county' zoning authority grants pcnnll. With the exception of foster family homes the requirements of this of subdivision apply to all licensed residential facilities, and for cities of the first class •nil apply even if a facility is considered a permitted single family residential use of 111- „Ins toaccording to subdivision 3. � .9 licensed residential facility serving six or fewer persons or to shall he considered a � fK t ay care facility serving ten or fewer nuns tat ermitled single family residential use of property for ale purposes of zoning. he t`` ! Unless otherwise provided in any town, municipal or county of Is, ,.,,'':•,,,,? _pb, '—''�"-iwiing regulation, a licensed day care or residential facility serving from seven through sixteen persons shall he considered a permitted multi -family residential l osc of property for purposes of Tatting. A township. municipal or county zoning authority may require a conditional use or special use permit in order to assure he proper nninicmmcc ;uul operation of ;I L•Icility, provided that till conditions shall be imposed tin ale homes which are more restrictive than those imposed oil other conditional uses or special uses of residential property in the same zones, unless such additional conditions are necessary to protect the belth and safety of the facility. Nothing herein shall he construed to exclude or prohibit residents of the residential homes from single family zones if otherwise permitted by a local zoning ie regulation. Subd. 5. Notwithstanding any, law to the contrary, no license or provisional license shall he issued under sections 245.781 ill 245.812 and 252.28, subdivision 2 without 30 days written notice from the conmlissiuner to the affected municipality or other political subdivision. d-�L,rn o RESOLUTION N0. 1709 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA A RESOLUTION RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 1425 AND TRANNSFER- RING ALL ASSETS A14D LIABILITIES OF THE SPECIAL CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND TO THE SILVER LAKE WOODS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT CONSTRUCTION FUND WHEREAS, Resolution No. 1425, "A Resolution Establishing A Special Capital Projects Fund and Guidelines for Expenditures From Said Fund", established the Special Capital Projects Fund; and WHEREAS, residual Minnesota State Aid (MSA) construction monies from the Silver Lake Woods Improvement Project were deposited in the Special Capital Projects Fund; and WHEREAS, an opinion has been received from the City Attorney advising that any residual NSA construction monies received should be deposited in a project's construction fund; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council that Resolution No. 1425 is hereby rescinded; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that all assets and liabilities of the Special Capital Projects Fund be transferred to the Silver Lake Woods Improvement Project Construction Fund. Adopted this 22rd day of January 1984. ATTEST: Mayor (SEAL) Clerk -Administrator t4�4i� MEMO TO: Clerk -Administrator Mayor and City Council FROM: Building Inspector el DATE: January 16, 1984 SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR REFUND ON SEWER SERVICE INSTALLATION AT 2581/83 COUNTY ROAD I Attached is a request for payment of a sewer service installation from Mr. Roger H. hoopmeiners, builder and owner of the two-family dwelling at 2581/83 County Road I. City as-builts indicated that a sewer service was available for the lot at the above address but at the time of the sewer installation the service could not be found. Either the service was never installed or the location was drastically off as given in the as-builts. Since a service could not be found the contractor then had to dig down to the main and tap for the service. City records indicate that the lot was originally assessed $295.21 for a sewer service lateral. Attached with the request for payment are invoices from the sewer and water contractor and the paving contractor for work involved in the installation of the sewer service which totaled $1,401.00. The history of such requests is very limited due to difficulties in finding any. Only one could be found dating back to 1981. In that case a water service had been assessed for but was unable to be found. The Council then ordered the installation at a cost of $675.00, with the work being done by the private contractor. The original assessed cost for the service was $106.00. The following are the options staff would offer: The City could refund the assessed cost of the service, plus interest from the date of the actual assessment. Establish a maximum limit, i.e., today's average assessed cost for service installations. Authorize payment of the bills as submitted. RECOMMENDATION: Staff would recommend options 1 or 2 in that order. Although there exists one case in the past regarding this type of an occurrence, it would be in the City's best interest to establish or know the maximum liability in these types of occurrences. Again, this matter has been discussed with the City Attorney and he concurs with this recommendation. Staff will await Council direction in this matter. J SAR/pf Attachments r, January 4, 1984 Dear Mayor McCarty and Members of the City Council: In 1983 I built a duplex on the corner of CountyRoad it was and Greenwood Drive. During the construction phase determined that a sanitary sewer service connection from the sewer main on Greenwood Drive was not stabbed into the lot and it was necessary for my sewer sub -contractor to tap into the main and extend service onto the lot. The cost for this work, which included restoration of the street surface totalled $1,401.00, documentation is attached. As assessments were levied against the lot, which have since been paid, for the construction of water and sanitary sewer mains and service connections, I do not feel that I should be responsible for the installation of a service connection which was supposedly installed with the initial improvements. Therefore, I would request that the City of Mounds View reimburse me for all of the expenses I incurred for installing the sanitary sewer service connection at the time I built the duplex. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, gVRgjoer H. Koopmn=rs Attachments Invoice No U01293 & Sara. eamw&" &Ygoe. 11115 CROOKED LAKE BLVD. COON RAPIDS, MN 421.3434 old TO: _-_aynnc RocQrc I'01wO 111C. 18 2_;orthda1___lvd.__.__ Coon Rapid Nn 55=t3'i 55433 Date: 11-JU-85 Your Order No. Our Order No. Date Completed: 11-3-83 Terms: on completion lantity Description Unit Price Total i end of driveway installation at 2587-03 Cty Rd 1 176.00 1 Street repair at above address 451.00 1 STATEMENT : 1 HANK WEIDEMA EXCAVATING, INC. i ;;; :sus ;'.:":'.;<'• `:;;::.`; ,,;,..�,;;,; 1 4500 IOIST AVENUE NORTH iW. BROOKLYN PARK, MINNESOTA 55443 - •_- TELEPHONE. !6121425 5355 F- DATE: Roger Koopmeinera 8124 pleasant View Court tdoundsview, Minnesota 55432 L JOB ADDRESS: 4 al'- / MEMO TO: Clerk -Administrator ("1 City Council FROM: Building Inspector DATE; January 16, 1984 RE: SECURITY DEPOSIT RELEASE TO J01114 MESSINGA FOR 7280 SILVER LAKE ROAD John Mezzinga received approval from the City in August of 1977 to relocate a single family structure into Mounds View at the above location. A deposit of $1,000.00 was required to assure all City requirements were met. An easement along the south thirty feet was required for drainage purposes. An easement was drafted and submitted to the City but was not filed with the County at that time. Due to the wording and now present ownership of the property the easement submitted can not be filed. However, the easement area now falls totally within a protected wetland and the easement, as was originally required, is not necessary. This matter has been discussed with the City Attorney and he concurs with staff recommendation. RECOMMENDATION: Authorize release of $1,000.00 security plus interest by resolution for the regular meeting; Consent Agenda January 23, 1984. SR/ds 5 19 H2-- 16 1 15 14 WIII'ANP ZON I NI, DISTRICT MAP X, Irf.-ROAD-- $4L 4 L ip US 73 F (�il 43 d 3 c 15, 0 73 of 0 cl 41 0 7 LL— 0 Ilix 0 loo r� IAD ........ OLOU 15A- 4 z 0 .. ..... 1 18 -jkiaL: loo 89 5 1 in 12 II 10 134 4 4 2 I 17 - Q. 71 6 -41 C, s2z d -OCLEARVi 4 i 15 31 30 29 12 35 9 134 -Oki 14 34 894 0 14 32 33 34 LIJ I -RIDGE > 32 2 —.3-U 7 PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL i-� CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA Regular Meeting + � �g r+ � January 9, 1984 V N A9 u Y r L U Mounds View City Hall 2401 Hwy. 10, Mounds View, MN 55112 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- The Mounds View City Council was called to order by Mayor McCarty at 7:31 PM on January 9, 1984. MEMBERS PRESENT: Councilmembers Linke, Hankner, anc ar , Doty and Mayor McCarty. ALSO PRESENT: City Attorney Meyers and Clerk/ Administrator Pauley. Motion/Second: Doty/Linke to approve the December TF7minutes as corrected. 5 ayes 0 nays There were no residents requests or comments from the floor. Motion/Second: Dotv/Hankner to approve the consent agenda, as presented, and waive the reading of the resolutions. 5 ayes 0 nays Mayor McCarty pointed out the Council had just been informed by Park Director Anderson of the wrong transmission being placed in the truck the City just received, and stated the problem should be attempted to be resolved right away. He also expressed concern with the type of seats to be supplied in the new patrol cars, as once they are modified to make room for the radio equipment, the shorter patrolmen have trouble getting the seat far enough forward to drive comfortably, and he recommended bucket seats. He also stated that in checking, he has found out that low gear lock -out cannot be supplied with a tilt steering wheel, yet the bid received from Minor Ford includes both options. .1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Approval of Minutes: December 17, 198 Motion Carried 4. Residents Re- quests and Comments from the Floor 5. Approval of Consent Agenda Motion Carried 6. Consideration of Staff Memo Regar ing Purchase of Police Patrol Vehicle Mounds View City Council January 9, 1984 Page Two Regular Meeting --------------------------------------------------- Clerk/Administrator Pauley explained that the price Staff is recommending does include bucket seats. Ile also explained that the tilt wheel steering wheel is not to be included with the low gear lock -out. Ile had also explained that the City has frequently problems getting equipment the way it was bid, and their policy is that upon delivery, the equipment is checked over thoroughly, and a letter is sent to the supplier if any discrepencies are noted, and the equipment is kept, unused, in the garage until the problem is solved, and then the City pays for it. Clerk/Administrator Pauley stated he will be bringing the question of propane conversion of the two new vehicles to the Council in the near future. " a Mayor McCarty noted there was a slight difference in the sizes of the spotlights being bid. Attorney Meyers advised that would not present a problem. 'Zl,_ Motion/Second: Doty/Linke to accept the bid of Minar Ford o $21,060.36, with the money to be allocated from the general fund for the police patrol vehicles. ' Motion Carr 5 ayes 0 nays Mayor McCarty closed the regular meeting and 7. Public Hearing: opened the public hearing at 7:45 PM. Rezoning of 5468 Adams Street Dennis Qualic, 5464 Adams Street, asked why the request was before the Council, and who had made it. Tom Diffley explained he was a representative of Cross of Glory Lutheran Church, who owns the property, and they will be building an addition to the north of their complex, and will no longer need the present building to the south, which has been used as an educational center for the past 15 years. He explained they need the equity from that structure to build the new addition to the church, and they have found a buyer who would like to open a child care center. He stated the Code is such that R-1 does not allow a child care center, so the property must be rezoned so that the building can be used again. Mr. Diffley explained that presently the building is used to educate the children of the congrega- tion, and is used evenings, Saturdays and Sundays. The proposed child care center would have between 15 and 40 small children, from 6 AM to 6 PM, weekdays, with no nighttime use. Mounds View City Council January 9, 1984 Regular Meeting ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Page Three ^Tfir. Qualic asked if the zoning is changed, if the property would become commercial. ' f Mayor McCarty explained that due to the description ` in the Comp Plan and the ordinance, it would have to be low density residential use for R-2, and the only business other than a home occupation that is allowed is a child care center, and that anything else would oe require further rezoning. Clerk/Administrator Pauley explained there are a number of State and Municipal laws that must be complied with, and that some remodeling of the building must occur. Mr. Diffley explained the remodeling would be more interior than exterior, with extensive interior remodeling required, and a ramp would have to be installed outside, along with a fence being put up. Mayor McCarty closed the public hearing and reopened the regular meeting at 7:51 PM. Motion/Second: Doty/Blanchard to have the first 8. 1st Reading of reading ordinance No. 353 amending the Municipal Ordinance No. 35 Code of Mounds View by amending Chapter 41 entitled "Specific Rezonings", and waive the reading of the ordinance. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Attorney Meyers presented a proposed take over 9. Report of agreement from the bonding company regarding the Attorney Long Lake Road ditch project. He explained Willard Davis has been chosen to complete the project, and that he was one of the original subcontractors for the project. He added that he and Engineering Consultant Boxrud feel confident the project will be completed. He also explained that an additional $200 has been requested due to a larger area being seeded, with $5,980,87 being the balance of the contract, and $4,038.78 being the cost to re -let the project, which is being assumed by the bonding company. Clerk/Administrator Pauley stated that Willard Davis had been doing an acceptable job earlier, and the City is comfortable with using him now. Motion/Second: McCarty/Doty to authorize Staff to complete the take over agreement for the Long Lake Road ditch project, and reject the bids the City received on January 5, 1984 for the project. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Mounds View City Council January 9, 1984 Regular Meeting Page Tour ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Attorney Meyers recommended a letter be sent to the low bidder, explainingthe situation and why his bid was rejected. Councilmember Li.nke had no report. Councilmember Hankner reported she had tried out the cross country ski trails around Silver View Park, and found them very enjoyable except for where snowmobiles had gone through and ruined the track for the skiers, Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported that notices have been published on the snowmobile ordinance in the City Newsletter, and the Police have found it nearly impossible to control the problem. Mayor McCarty asked that a notice be sent to the Police Department, advising them of this particular problem. Councilmember Blanchard had no report. Councilmember Doty reported the Park and Rec Commission met on January 5 and discussed the new program for fitness and health. He also advised that the City is in a good position to receive a grant for $2,500 for a fitness trail, with the LuLa' CosL of a trail to be approximately $7,500, and that Park Director Anderson has suggested approaching Burger King to see if they would be willing to sponsor the trail. Mayor McCarty reported he was readv to bring before the Council for their consideration Commissioners would would like to continue their service to the City, Motion/Second: McCarty/Blanchard to reappoint to three year terms on the Planning Commission, Peg Mountin as Chairman for 1984, and Josey Warren. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion/Second: McCarty/Doty to reappoint to the Nar and—Rec Commission, for a 3 year term, Wayne Burmeister as Chairman, Ed Letendre, Wayne Weflen, and Frank Silvis. 5 ayes 0 nays l 10. Reports of Councilmembers Motion Carried Motion Carr Mounds View City Council January 9, 1984 Regular Meeting Page Five ---------------------------------------------------------------- ------ ^Motion/Second: McCarty/Hankner to reappoint to tho :estivit es �`ommission for a 3 year term Kathy Pomerleau. 5 ayes 0 nays Mayor McCarty asked that the applicants who need to U be interviewed be set up for 15 minute appointments each at the next agenda session. He also advised that if any Chairmen intendsto do any interviewing, 10 they should do so before the last Council meeting in January, so the Council can review their recommendations. Motion/Second: McCarty/Hankner to direct Staff to etermEe or receive estimates of cost for a con- sultant to serve the City in the capacity of review- ing and determining certain considerations in the Master Plan for the Anoka County Airport, such as need, environmental concerns and accuracy. 5 ayes 0 nays Clerk/Administrator Pauley presented the 1984 janitorial service bids to the Council. .Motion/Second: Linke/Hankner to award the 1984 contractor janitorial services to Jim's Building Maintenance, subject to filing of certificate of insurance and other general conditions specified ;n rhP anecifications. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion/Second: Linke/Hankner to adjourn the meet- inging aTM. 5 ayes 0 nays Respectfully submitted, Donald F. Pauley Clerk/Administrator Motion Carried Motion Carried 11. Report of Administrator Motion Carried 12, Adjournment Motion Carried n DATE APPROVED: 1/9/84 PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL �^ CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW I RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA Regular Meeting December 27, 1983 Mounds View City Hall 2401 Hwy. 10, Mounds View, MN 55112 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- The Mounds View City Council was called to order 1. Call to Order by Mayor McCarty at 7:30 PM on December 27, 1983. MEMBERS PRESENT: Councilmembers Doty, Linke, 2. Roll Call an ner, Blanchard and Mayor McCarty. ALSO PRESENT: City Attorney Meyers and Clerk/ Administrator Pauley. Motion di Doty/Hankner to approve the 3. Approval of 6ecem er 983 minutes as presented. Minutes: December 12, 5 ayes 0 nays 1983 Motion Carried Clerk/Administrator Pauley explained that since 4. Public Hearing there was no second reading of the proposed new Rezoning of 54 code at the December 12 meeting, public notice Adams Street was not published and the property in question can not be rezoned to R-2 until the new code is adopted. Motion/Second: Doty/Blanchard to reschedule the public hearing for the rezoning of 5468 Adams Street to January 9, 1984 at 7:40 PM. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried There were no residents requests or comments from 5. Residents Re - the floor. quests and Comments from the Floor Mayor McCarty asked that Item I be removed for 6. Approval of discussion. Consent Agenda Motion/Second: Linke/Hankner to approve the consent agenda, minus Item I, and waive the read- ing of the resolutions. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Mounds View City Council December 27, 1983. Regular Meeting Page Twp ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mayor McCarty clarified LhaL Councilmember Hankner should be listed as Lhe representative to the Festivities Commission, rather than Councilmember Linke. Motion/Second: Linke/Doty to approve Item I, with Councilmember Hankner to he the representative to the Festivities Commission, and waive the reading. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Motion/Second: McCarty/Blanchard to authorize 7. Consideration staff to purchase steel garage doors from the Staff Memo Automatic Garage Door Company, in the amount of Regarding Quo- $1,520.00, tations for Police Garage 5 ayes 0 nays Door Replaceme Motion Carried Clerk/Administrator Pauley reviewed Staff's memo 8. 2nd Reading and of December 27, regarding a time extension for Adoption of Dynamic Designers construction commencement. He Ord, No. 348 stated Staff would reconunend an extension to the time limit to the wetlands alteration permit, for 90 days, commencing on February 4, 1984. Motion/Second: McCarty/Linke to have the second reading and adoption of Ordinance No. 348, amend- ing the municipal code of Mounds View by amending Chapter 41 entitled, "Specific Rezonings", and waive the reading. Councilmember Doty - aye Councilmember Linke - aye Councilmember Hankner - aye Councilmember Blanchard - aye Mayor McCarty - aye Motion Carried Motion/Second: Linke/Hankner to authorize an extension 01 90 days to the time requirements for the wetlands alteration permit, to commence on February 4, 1984. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Clerk/Administrator Pauley clarified that the money 9. Consideration for the purchase of the vehicle is in the general of Staff h'-^o fund, not the revenue sharing account. Regarding is for 4-14heL,_ Park Director Anderson explained that a complication Drive Tractor has arisen, in that an individual has approached the City and offered to by the City's 1963 tractor for Mounds View City Council December 27, 1983 Regular Meeting Page Three ------------------------------------------------------------------------- f/"*" cash, for $1,000 more than the dealer was allowing on a trade-in. He added that the dealer has indi- cated he will withdraw his low bid if he does not get the tractor as a trade-in. He also explained that Attorney Meyers has advised the City is not tied to making the trade-in, Park Director Anderson advised the Council that the tractor is 20 years old and is in very poor condition, and they could possibly run into problems by selling it to an individual, if he should come back to them later with complaints. There was considerable discussion regarding the merits of selling to an individual, and realizing a $1,000 additional payment for the used tractor. Attorney Meyers recommended asking Kortuem's if they are willing to up their trade-in offer to $3,500. Motion/Second: Linke/Blanchard to authorize the purchase of the 4-wheel drive tractor from Kortuem's for $19,428.52, and authorize Park Director Anderson to negotiate the best price for the trade-in or sale of the International Tractor. 5 ayes 0 nays Park Director Anderson reviewed his memo of 10 December 22 regarding the MEED Grant. He explained that the person hired will actually be an employee of Ramsey County. Motion/Second: Doty/Linke to authorize Staff to retain Ms. LeAnn Linder as a healthy lifestyle/ wellness coordinator to be paid for out of the MEED Grant application. 5 ayes 0 nays Piotion/Second: Doty/Blanchard to remove Ordinance o. rom the table. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion/Second: McCarty/Hankner to approve the second reading and adoption of Ordinance No. 352, and waive the reading, adding the amendments embodied in Staff's memo dated December 22, 1983. Councilmember Doty - aye Councilmember Linke - aye Councilmember Hankner - aye Councilmember Blanchard - aye Mayor McCarty - aye Motion Carried Consideration of Staff Memo Regarding the Submission of MEED Grant App cation for a Wellness Coord Motion Carried 11. 2nd Reading an, Adoption of Ordinance No. 3 Motion Carried Motion Carried Mounds View City Council. December 27, 198� Regular ,Meeting Page Four ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attorney Meyers had no report. 12. Report of -- Attorney Councilmember Doty reported the Personnel, Pension 13. Reports of and Labor Relations Committee of the League of Councilmembers Cities would be meeting on January 11, and will be discussing equal pay for equal work. Councilmember Linke had no report. Councilmember Hankner had no report. Councilmember Blanchard had no report. Mayor McCarty advised the Council of Commission appointments which are coming up. He stated he plans on reappointing Dick Paradise, for a 3 year term, and that Glen Dawson has indicated he is resigning, which is a 2 year term, and that Lowell Uber will be the Chairman of the Police Civil Service Commission as 1984 is the last year of his 3 year term. Mayor McCarty explained that his feeling is that as long as a commission member wishes to remain on a commission, he will reappoint them, as long as they have been doing a responsible job. Clerk/Administrator Pauley advised the Council that he and Technician Kampel and Building Inspector Rose had met with Robert Balch, who is working with Bill Beim on the Pinecrest Properties, and it appears they are getting ready to move on the development. Upon Council questioning, he stated he would check into the back taxes to insure they have been paid, and the proper accounts credited in the City. Motion/Second: Linke/Doty to adjourn the meeting at :+ 5 ayes 0 nays 14 15 Report of Administratur Adjournment Motion Carried "F. ted,