HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packets - 1984/01/23CITY COUNCIL MEETING
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
January 23, 1984
WORK SESSION
7:00 p.m.
A. Interview of Police Civil Service Commission Applicants
7:00 p.m. - Jacqulyn Saunders (Ms. Saunders will not be at
the meeting. She has a prior commitment on Monday
evenings.)
7:15 p.m. - Dick Paradise (We have been unable to reach
Mr. Paradise. As soon as we reach him we will let you know
if he will be present Monday evening.)
A G E N D A
7 30 p.m.
1. Call to Order
2: Roll Call - Linke, Hankner, Blanchard, Doty, McCarty
3. Approval of Minutes: January 9, 1984 (Regular Meeting)
(Received copy in 1/16/84 packet.)
�. 4, Piihlir Hearing - 7:40 p.m_ - Ragnna 765[ rnunty Road i from
I-1, Light Industrial District,
to B-3, Highway Business
District
5. Residents Requests and Comments from the Floor
------------------------------------------------
CITIZENS: BEFORE SPEAKING PLEASE GIVE YOUR
FULL NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE MINUTES
----.---------------------------------------
6. Approval of Consent Agenda
ITEM A. Reschedule February 20, 1984 Agenda Session for 7:00
p.m., February 21, 1984 Due to Holiday
ITEM B. Licenses for Approval
ITEM C. Approve Resolution No. 1708 Approving Just and
Correct Claims Against City Funds
7. Consideration of Staff Report Regarding Request for Refund on
Sewer Service Installation at 2581/83 County Road I (Material
to be handed out Monday.)
-continued-
AGENDA
January 23, 1984
Page Two
8. First Reading of Ordinance No. 355 Amending the Municipal
Code of Mounds View by Amending Chapter 40 Entitled, "Zoning"
9. First Reading of Ordinance No. 356 Establishing Chapter 27 of
the Municipal Code Entitled, "Special Projects Fund"
10. Approve Resolution No. 1709 Rescinding Resolution No. 1425
and Transferring All Assets and Liabilities of the Special
Capital Projects Fund to the Silver Lake Woods Improvement
Project Construction Fund
11. First Reading of Ordinance No. 354 Amending the Municipal
Code of Mounds View by Amending Chapter 41 Entitled,
"Specific Rezonings"
12. Approve Resolution No. 1704 Approving the Minor Subdivision
for the Burger King Corporation
13. Approve Resolution No. 1705 Approving a Conditional Use
Permit to the Burger King Corporation for a Convenience Food
Establishment
14. Approve Resolution No. 1703 Approving an Amendment to the
Planned Use Development for the Silver Lake Woods Development
15. Approve Resolution No. 1707 Authorizing the Clerk
Administrator and Mayor to Execute Development Agreement No.
84-64 with Burger King Corporation
16. Consideration of Feasibility Report for Public Improvements
on Fairchild Avenue Northerly of Laport Drive
17. Fourth Quarter 1983 Department Head Reports:
Director of Parks, Recreation and Forestry Anderson
Finance Director. Brager
Police Chief Ramacher
Public Works/Community Development
18. Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance No. 353 Amending the
Municipal Code of Mounds View by Amending Chapter 41
Entitled, "Specific Rezonings"
19. Report of Attorney
20. Report of Councilmembers - Linke, Ilanknar, Blanchard, Doty,
McCarty
21. Report of Administrator M
22. Adjournment
MEMO TO: City Council F,� City Administrator
FROM: Engineering/planning Technician
DATE: January 18, 1984
SUBJECT: Roy Schaffhausen Request
Mr. Roy Schaffhausen, 5130 Bona Road, came into City Hall on Wednesday,
January 18th questioning why the City would not let him construct an
asphalt driveway up to his fence line which is about one foot from his
property line. I made him a copy of the section of the zoning code which
states that driveways must be at least 5 feet from the property line.
He also questioned why the City is able to construct a walkway (located
along his south property line) right up to his property line and not have
to be 5 feet away: Mr. Schaffhausen was told that the intended purpose
for a walkway vs. a driveway are different. He then stated that he would
like to construct a "walkway" immediately adjacent to his driveway. (Called
it a walkway to be used as a driveway to park a vehicle).
He mentioned that he would be attending the Council meeting on the 23rd to
discuss his request and the City's refusal to grant a permit without a
variance.
FJK/mb
OWS CONSENT AGENDA
January 23, 1984
The Consent Agenda is a technique designed to expedite handling
of routine and miscellaneous official business of the City
Council. The entire Agenda may be adopted by the Council in one
motion. The motion for adoption is non -debatable and must
receive unanimous approval. By request of any individual
Councilmember, any item can be removed from the Consent Agenda
and placed upon the Regular Agenda for. debate.
ITEM A. Reschedule February 20, 1984 Agenda Session for 7:00
p.m., February 21, 1984 Due to Holiday
ITEM B. Licenses for Approval
General - Expire 6/30/84
A & S Construction Specialties - New
Lindman Builders - New
Heating & Air Conditioning - Expire 6/30/84
Northeast Sheet Metal - new
As2halt - Expire 6/30/84
J & R B1ackLop - New
Masonry - Expire 6/30/84
Coronado Stone Products - New
Sign & Billboard - Expire 6/30/84
Crosstown Sign, Inc. - New
National Advertising Company - New
ITEM C. Adopt Resolution No. 1708 - Approving ,lust and Correct
Claims Against City Funds
. RESOLUTION NO. 1708
CITY OF HOIINiz V1l:117
('0;1hTY Gi' IL'ii "iliY
:;7 TE' OF 1511111-'",OT'A
APPIV)VIN0 JUSTAND CORIOXT
s r41"; AGATN(il' CITY fUill.'S
WHEiii-A:', Lhe CiL; Oiumil of ':dculld" View, pursuallt to
!Jhmcsota Sl.ntutu:: fill! auLlloriLy over the financial. affairs
of the City and;
WHEREAS, Thr. City Cameil Iris reviewed the olaims numbers:
17371
through
17372 in the amount of
$ 3.722.50
17373
through
17389 In the amount of
$ 49,228.90
12831
through
12880 in the amount of
$ 79,779.99
through
in the etnount of
$
TOTAL. AMOUNT o9 CIAR.; PUSENTED $
132,731.39
and has
found said
claims to be and correct;
,just
(lia.L of any exception)
NOW THEREFOR, he it resolved thnt the City Council of Mounds View
hereby approved thu Ittnchc:l lists of claims dated _ by the,
vote ayes nayes
ATTEST:
Mayor —
(SEAL)
Clerk -Administrator
CHECK
17371
17372
Cj
N
ADDITIONAL, DIRECT EXPENDITURES
AMOUNT CLAIMANT
$3,622.50 John C. Johnson
100.00 Judy Johnson
$3,722.50
PURPOSE
Professional services
Wages, part-time
CITY OF
PCUNGS VIIN
A C C O U N I S P Y A E L E
:.ATE 1-24-5a FeC : 1
CHECKS
A M C U N I
C L 4 I h. A N I
P U F P C S r
I017376
20.C9
NILLIAH hEATON
SLPPLIESi V_HILL-
- 017377
25.63
INCUSIPIAL LLF ♦ PLYHCUii
SUPPLJ=S,C°_Rll1nG
C17378
Z00.00
VAFY JC TnCMF;Lh
P&OGRAM INEMCIU-S
017379
10,35C.60
NCFTh SUEUFCAN CABLE
CABLE T V (CHBiS:dICN
017382
Si 157. 75
CBCUF HEALIH FLAN INC
SALARIES, rL'GL;J:
017384
113.38
LHCIT nEALIH PROT FLAN
CF.OUF INSLPINCG
60385
7.60
PINNESOTA MUTUAL LIFE
GROUP INSLPANCE
017386
81.to
FICELITY ANO GUARANTY
GROUP INELihNCE
017387
7C.OD
UNIYERSITY CF MINNCSCTA
TRAINING
017373
1948E.73
A+N CONSTRLCTION
ECUIFMENT
--017374
2133E.31
STATE TREAS - P E F A
FENSICNS - —
017380
12.65
ST PALL dOCKtSTATICNERY
SUPPLIES ,CFERATING
017381
319256.00
FIFST STATE BANK Of
SALARIES, REGLLA4
ANO-PENSIONS
-- ANO-SALARI! ,TEMF#PART
AND-GVER11hL, REGLLAR
D11388 41.00 AOVANCE UNITEG SUPPLIES ,CP-RATINE
017389 64.58 CITY OF HOLNOS VIEN SUPPLIES, OPERATING
ANO-RISC CFFItE SLPPLI
ANO-FNINTING
15 491228.90 NECESSARY EXFENOITLRES SINCE LAST COUNCIL MEETING
CITY OF
MCUNGS VIEW
A C C O U N T S P A V L :' L L
"ATE 01-24-84 FAG': 2
�
ChECK*
A M C U N T
C L A I M: N 1
f U •� P O S E
j
012831
173.10
EIGh10N VEIE6INAR1 hC:;F
CTHEF FFCIES5ICNAt S E R V
012832
219.d0
CAFSCNITE 1NTL CC�F
SUPPLIES, ELW SOC6NOS
•
;!
012833
91.23
ChAFIN PIGIiSbINC
LEGAL NOTICES
'''--
l
012834
9E.30
CCNSEFV
CIHEF F9CFESSIONAL SERV
1, 0
012835
33E.20
CL'FY GUPLICATING FFCC
ntNTAL, LCuINIU4
012836
51.62
GATA DISPATCH INC
WIT. SVCS., CELIVERY
012837
19071.60
CA IA OPERATIONS, INC.
CCNT. SVCS., KLY FUNCH
k'
fe,
012838
29141.02
INCEFENCENT SCHL CIS E21
GRAN% , SUCJICIcS
'
.;
AI
r
r
012839
262.53
LILLIE SLELRBAN NEhS
LEGAL NOTICLS
a
r
012840
8.83
MAC QUEEN EQUIPMENT
SUPPLIES, EGUIIPHENT
ijd
012841
18,513.CG
METRO WASTE CONTROL CCMh
F E F L h C
012842
4943G.00
FICHARC PLIERS
GENERAL LEGAL SERVICES
r'
AND-PROSECUII G ATTY SERVICE.
Ah0-AGMIN. CRGES PAYABLE"
;3
012843
77.E0
MINN FIRE INC
SUPPLIES, ELDES4CFNCIS
L.
n.an,...
cG 7c
&I•MEcO TA ln4f Thr
CIIPPL TiS_. FCIITPMFNT
V .VV1l
•
�!
012845
5.E3
POLNES VIEW CLF CNN HONE
SUPPLIES, BLOTS*GFNOS�
'
AND- SLFPLIES,OPEFATING
AND—'MFLIES, EQUIP"€NT
312846
243.85
h 1 CELL TELEFHONE CO
COMMLNICATIONS-TELEPHONE
d
012847
124.32
NEW EFIGhTCN hOME
SLPPLIES90PERATING
ANO-SLFFLIES, 8LCCS+6RNOSit
1'
012848
6,292.46
NORTHERN SLATES POFER GC
ELECTRICITY
ANC-NAILFAL GAS
i —
ANO-STREET LIWS
_
ANO-TRAFFIC SIGNAtS - ELECT
_
`!
012849
39c73.17
NOFTFERN STALLS PCVE6
ELEGIFICIIY
1
ANO-kATUFAL GAS-
AND-19AFFIC SIGNALS - ELECT
CITY OF MGUNUS VILN
CHCCK• A M 0 U N 1
A C ( C U h 1 5 V c 1 4 e L
C I. A i t t N T
012850
3,04E.41
NOFTFEPN STATES FCkER
012851
3,a 3 . ! I
FAFSLY CCUNTY TREASUFLI1
012852
97.00
ROAD RUNNER PAkCEL SER
012853
013.43
SMITH LLM?ER CO
012854
5.57
ShYOERS CRLG STORES
C12855
281.45
CITY CF SFF.INC LAKE FARK
012656
108.20
SPRING LAKE FK REG GEFT
012857
14i4C0
TIME SHARING BUS SYSTEMS
012858
36.05
TE}GAS
012859
29394.G0
VO10 REARCCN TAUTUES CO
012860
1♦E70.80
CITY OF MITE EEAR LAKE
Ili!
012861
151.14
ZACKS INC
r�
F
'
0128E2
25.00
E'..AO NEIhm
012863
13Le05
RECREChICS CORF
B12864
9.73
OOAS NEWTON
It
�11
P12865
21.00
FC'ELYN W410EL
012866
3.15
AT4T IhFCRNATICN SYSTEMS
012867
230.00
ANCKA LCLNTY SGUACFCN
C12868
48.20
OUFRGUGHS COFPLRAIICN
f_
012869
302.00
OONAFUE THCRhTCN INS
��.
012870
11.00
NGhT LEAANIN6 OPPi
CAIi: il-[4-h�FAot 3 I
F U � F C ).
ELECTRICITY
00-SIFEE1 LIGHTS
ANU-NAILFAL VIS
GCMHLNILAIIChl-TILEPHONE
CCNI. SVCs., IELIVERY
SuPPLIES 9CFIATING ---
AhU-SLPFLI_;tBLOGS♦GRNOS
AND-SLFFLII.i,UIILITI ES
SUPPLIES,CPFR1IDG
CCLLICTICt"OTHER AGCYS
SUPPLIES,CPERITJ,NC
CTHEF FFCFESSICNAL SEP.V
INVENTORY - -
OTHER FACFES;JCNAL SERV
SALARIES, FEGLLAF
ANO-SALARIES,IENF♦PART TIME
A"-FENSICNS
ANO-F.I.L.A.
ANU-kchKEkS ciricnSATlori
SUPPLIES,CPERPTING
ANO-SUPPLTES,;VEHICLE
PROGRAM INSIRLCTORS
SLFFLIES,CPEKATING —
SUPPLIES, SLOGS+GRNOS
F E F U h u
COMMUh ICA 1WNS-TELMONE-
FOSTACE
MISC GFFICE SUPPLIES
INSURANCE ♦ OGNCS
BCOKS ♦ PERIOOICALS
CITY OF PCUNCS VIEW
A C L L L N T S F A Y A� L L
LATE. 'J1-24-84 FAGL 4
CHF CK+
A M 0 U N T
C L A I M A N T
P U F F G S t
012871
25o36E.24
WRC hASTE CONTROL COMP
W RC WASTE CCNT (CHN
012872
19481.70
POLNLS VIEW FPIN71NC
FSINTINC
012673
4E.00
P F 0 A
TkAINING
012874
64,00
FAPELA S RGSE
SALARJES,IEHPIPARI TIME
012875
164.30
S + T OFFICE FSCCL(TS
SUPPLIES, OWS+GFNOS
ANO-MISC CFFI(E SUPPLIES
012876
264.CC
S C S OFFICE EGUIPPENT
REPAIRS, EOu11PcNl -�
012877
389.05
SATELLITE INOLSTRIES
SATELLITES
012678
40.00
U S POSTMASTEF
FCSTACE
012879
933.60
NOFTH SUEURBAN 0 A C
GFANIS F .)UdSIGIES
012880
50.00
CHICAGO PEART ASSOC
CFAN1.) # Sl'ES1OItS
50
79977S.99
CFECKS WRITTEN
TOTAL OF
65 CPECKS TOTAL 1299008.89
ctc yyl
MEMO TO: CiLy Council 8 Clerk -Administrator
FROM: Engineering/Planning Technician
DATE: January 17, 1984
SUBJECT: Day Care Ordinance
As directed at the January 16, 1984 Agenda meeting, attached
is Ordinance No. 355 amending Chapter 40 as it relates to
day care centers. In this Ordinance, 3 revisions have been
made that the Council did not see at the Agenda session. They
are:
SECTION 1. (40.02 Subd B (8)). The term Boarding
(House) Ilome - Foster Children has been replaced
by residential facility (non -licensed) and licensed.
This term and definition is no longer used.
SECTION III. (40.07 Subd H (2)). The term "Boarding
house" used in this paragraph refers to Boarding
House (Room House) as defined by definition (9)
in the Zoning Code. It does not refer to Boarding
(House) Home - Foster Children (definition (8)),
Boarding (House) Home - Foster Children has been
replaced by residential facility (non -licensed) and
licensed. Therefore "Boarding house" should remain
in this paragraph.
SECTION VI. (40.10 Subd C (4a)). Additional language
has been added to (4a) which exemntt the requirement
that no other person other than who resides on the
premises for Home Occupation purposes if they are
employed in conjunction with day care or residential
facilities.
First reading of this Ordinance is dated for your January 23rd
meeting. The Second reading would then be on February 13, 1984
which is two days after the Zoning Code text revisions would
officially become effective. This is the reason why the
new zoning code was used as a basis for the drafting of this
Ordinance. The new Zoning Code will be in effect when the
second reading of this Ordinance is held.
FJK/mb L ,
ORDINANCE NO, 355
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COIINTY OF RAMSI;Y
STATE OF MTNNESOTA
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF MOUNDS
VIEW BY AMENDING CHAPTER 40 ENTITLED, "7,ONING"
The Council of the City of Mounds View does hereby ordain:
SECTION I. Chapter 40.02, Subd. R, is amended by deleting
the following definitions:
(8) Hoarding (House) Home - Foster Children. A family
dwelling where children out of ttheir own homes are
cared for.
(23) Day Care -_Home. A family dwelling in which foster
care, supervision and training of children of school
or pre-school age who are cared for during established
business hours.
(24) Da Care - croup Nursery. A service providedtthe
public, in which children of school or pre-school
age
are cared for (luring established business hours.
SECTION II. Chapter 40.02 is amended by adding the
' following definitions in their proper numerical order and
renumbering all other definitions, as necessary:
(23) Day Care Facility. A facility as defined under Mn.
Statutes 245.782, Subd. 5.
(24) Day_Care Facility, Licensed. A facility as defined
under Mn. Statutes 245.782, Subd. 5, as regulated by
Mn. statutes 245.812, Subd. 3.
(91) Residential Facility. A facility as defined under
Mn. Statutes 245.782, Subd. 6.
(92) Residential Facility, Licensed. A facility as defined
under Mn. Statutes 245.782, Subd. 6, as regulated by
Mn. Statutes 245.812, Subd. 3.
SECTION III. Chapter 40.07, Subd. H(2) is amended to read
as follows:
(2) Boarding House, Residential Facility (Non -licensed)
serving Six (6) or More Persons, Residential F_acilit ,
Sven (7) or
Licensed, Serving"More Persons,
Frate-ouse, and Sorority House. Sforwwhom
(2) parking spaces for each three (3) persons
accommodations are provided for sleeping.
Ordinance No. 355
Page Two
SECTION IV. Chapter 40.07, Subd. 11 (13) is amended to read
as follows:
(13) Sanitarium, Convalescent Home Rest Home, Nursinq Home
r3;Q
ac111Lv (Non -
Facility, Licensed, Serving Fleyen (11) or More
Persons. Four (4) spaces plus one (1) space for each
three (3) hods for which accommodations are offered.
SECTION V. Chapter 40.10, Subd. H is amended to read as
follows:
(1) Single Family Detached Dwellings.
{2+---Heard+mg-{Hnese}-Hex:a---Faster-QH+4dreme--keskr+stied
ta-a-font}p-dwe}}4ng-4m-wh+eH-eH#4drem-anti-of-the4r
awn-HemesT-age-s4xkeem-{}6}-pears-er-umderr-er-4m-the
ease -of -men ta4-retardat+em-age -twenty-ame-+2++-at
under; -are -ea rent-far-twenty-fear-444}-Hams-a-dap-€er
a-per#ad-ef-kH4rkp-{3B-1-daps:--�Ha-mdmher-te-He-eared
far-4m-nme-{}}-it) ster-eh44d- board 4mg- {house+-heme
9ha}}-not-exeeed-f4ve-{5+;-4meIuding -the-faster
fam44pls-ewm-eh44drem:
(2) Day Care Facili
Persons, Includ
Residential Fac
Persons. Includ
n
Non -licensed, Five (5) or
the Familv's Own Children
a. Persons which are
remises.
Non -licensed, Five (5) or Less
Family's Own Children), Day
d (Tcn 10 or Lcc3 I1crGonu,
Own Children), Residential
x (6) or Less Persons, Includin
ran).
employed to meet county and
3ulations shall be permitted on
b. All county and state requlations and licensing
procedures have been adhered to.
{3+---Bap-Fare-Hamer--Restrteked-te-a-font}p-dwe}}}4mg-4n
wH4eh-fester-eareT-snperv4s4en-and-kra4n4mg-far
eh44dFen -eW-seHmem-ar-Pre-seller+}_age-auk-of-khe4r-awn
heme-+s-prev4ded-dr4ng-part-of -a-dap-{}eas-than
�we���-fenr-{E4+-Henrs+-w4kh-ne-aderm4gHt-aeeemmada-
k#ens-er-fne444t4es- and -eh4}dren-are-de44vered-and
removed-dotty:--THe-mnmHer-tm-He-eared-far-4m-ame-{++
dap-ear.e-Hame-sHa}}_net-exeeed-f4ve-F5+-One}nd4ng-the
kam4}yle-awn-eh4Idren:
(3) +44 Public Parks and Playgrounds.
11
•
Ordinance No. 355
Page, Three
(4) f54 I;ssuntial 50rvicos.
SECTION VI. Chapter 40.10, Suhd. C(4)a is amended to read
as follows:
a. involves employees other than persons residing on the
promises, except as allowud under Section 40.10, Subd.
B(2) or Section 40.11, Subd. E(2)
SECTION VII. Chapter 40.11, Subd. E(2) is amende to read as
follows:
{2;--Bap-Hare--- 6renp-Ndreery-prev#ded-that-
(2) A day care facility (non -licensed) serving six (6) or
more person, a residential facility (non -licensed)
serving six (6) or more persons, a day care facility,
licensed, and as defined under Mn. Statutes 245.782,
Subd. 5, serving eleven (11) or more persons or a
residential facility, licensed, and as defined under
Mn. Statutes 245.782, Subd. 6, serving seven (7) or
more persons provided that:
a:-Ne-everntght-€ael44t#es-are-prevlded-€er-the
eh#ldren-served:--Fht€dren-are-delivered-and
remaved-daily.
a. b- The front yard depth shall be a minimum of thirty
(30) feet.
b. e- Not less than forty (40) square feet of outside
playspace per child shall be provided and that such
space be suitably fenced and/or screened in
ar.rordance with conditions as may be specified by
the City Council.
C. d- Adequate off-street parking and access is provided
in compliance with Section 40.07 of the Code.
d. e- Adequate off-street loading and service entrances
are provided in compliance wiht Section 40.08 of
this Code.
e. f: The site and related parking and service shall be
served by an arterial or collector street of
sufficient capacity to accommodate the traffic
which wil be generated.
f. g: All signing and informational or visual communica-
tion devices shall be in compliance with the Mounds
View Sign Code (Chapter. 39).
q_ h- The provision of Section 40.25, Subd. A(5) of this
Code are consid, ed and satisfactorily met.
Ordinance No. ISr,
Palle Pour
h_. All county and and licensing
procedures havc> heen adhered to. Persons which are
emplaed_to meet count and state licensing
regulations shall —be t_o be on the
t•emiscs_--�-- -- _— ^
SECTION V111. Chapter 40.12, Subd. R, is amended to road as
follows:
Subd. H The following are permitted uses in an R-3 District:
(1) All pc�r'mitted uses allowed in an R-2 District.
(2) liultiple family dwelling structures containing
six (6) or less dwelling units.
(3) Hoarding houses as defined in Section 40.02,
Subd. 13 (8) and (9) and limited to not more
than eight (8) persons.
{4+--Boa rd4ng-{house}- home --- fester-eh44drent
Reser4eeed-to-eh4}siren-one-of-their -Own
homes7-ages-s4xteen-{464-years-or-under;-er
to-the-ease-of-menta}-retardation-age 14
twenty-one-{2}}-or- ender; -are- eat e-€or
twenty-€enr-{24}-hours-a-dap-for-a-period-e€
eh4r.-tp-{30f-daps---i:he-number-eo-he-eared-€er
in-one-fl-?-€osee.-eh:}d-heardiry-{hetl..el_6omn
sha}}-not-ekeeed-€4ve-{5-);-4ne4ed4ng-the
€aster-fam44pls-awn-eh4}dren7
{5}--eap-eare-hemee--Restr4eted-to-a-€am4}p
dwe}}4nh-4n-wh4eh-€ester-eare;-supervision-and
train4ng-€sr-eh4}dren-a€-sehee€-er-pre-seheal
age- out-o€-the-their-ewn-heme-4s-prov4ded
dnr}ng-park-e€-a-dap-{4ess-then-twenty-€ear
{�4}-hears•?-with-ne-overnight-aeeemmedat4ens
ar-fae444t4es-and-eh4}dren-are-de}4vered-and
removed -da4}pr--The-number-to-he-eare-£er-4n
one-{13-dap-eare-home-sha4}-net-exeeed-five
{53-4ne4ud4ng-the-€am44pls-own-eh4}dren-
(4) {64 Public Parks and Playgrounds.
(5) +44 Essential Services.
This ordinance shall take effect thirty days after the date
of its publication. 0
Ordinance No. 355
Page Five
Read by the Council of the City of Mounds View on the 23rd
day of January, 1984.
Read and passed by the Council of the City of Mminds View
this day of , 1984.
ATTEST:
(SEAL)
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Attorney
t
4
Mayor
Clerk —Administrator
1
n TO: Mayor s Council
�rF�ROM: Finance Director 'Preasurer
DATE: January 19, 1984
RE: AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A SPECIAL PROJECTS FDND
a special projects fund is sub-
iven at the
A proposed ordinance establishingto provision
mitted for your consideration. Pthisadraft �includes na91
January 1G, 196A Agenda. al improvements
that equipment and capial improvements financed by the fund must
'term Financial
be included in the Long al Plan.
mon
nd
In addition, 27.02 Subdivision 5, provides that paying
agents
entseOfuthe
a bond service charges of the paying 9 tion Fund.
may be used to pay
bonds formerly accounted for in the Improvement bond en ewh
of principal and interest
This Subdivision has been added because the escrow agent who will e
the investments and making payments onsible for those
managing agree to be resp i ' bility of the
of the defeased bonds wouthose charges will be the resp
charges. Therefore, payments are made. Those charges are es -
City until the 1,500 tofinal n$2,000 per year.
timated to he $
refund by adopting this ordinance.
specialep recommended that the Council establish a
RECOtAtdENDATION:
DB/ds
Attachment
ORDINANCE NU. 356
CITY OF MOUNDS VIED
COUNTY 01" RAMSEY
STATE OF NiNNESOTA
AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING CHAPTER 27 OF THE
MUNICIPAL CODE ENTITLED "SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND"
The Council of the City of. Mounds View does hereby ordain:
27.01 Definitions__
Subdivision ment Projects. Projects which
are intended to acquire, construct, permanently modify or
Purchase assets of a long term character
which
hlare intended to
continue to be held or used, such
as s and
machinery.
Subdivision 2. Emer ene. . An emergency is an occurrence
where the public health, safety, and welfare is jeopardized, declared by a
where immediate action is necessary, and must be
4/5 vote of the entire Council.
Subdivision 3. Enterprise Fund. A fund established to
finance and account or. the. acquisition, operation, and
maintenance of govermental facilities which are entirely or
lf.-supporting by user charges.Exaandl
es of
predominantly seelectric
enterprise funds are those for water, sewer, gasgarages, and transit
utilities, swimming pools, airports, Parking 9
stemq.
Subdivision 4. Equipment. Tangible property of a more or
ings or
less permanent nature, other land,
whichbisl�seful in carrying on
improvements other than buildings,
operations. Examples are machinery, trucks, cars, furniture, and
furnishings.
Subdivision 5. Genera_ 1 Government
M�caintena e�—
Costs incurred for the upkeep
condition for use- or occupancy which are used in theovernment�as
of services traditionally associated
municipal` enterprise
distinguished from those provided
operations.
Subdivision 6. General Goveeratinq Expenses. Costs
r nn
E
rendering of services traditionally
associated with municci
which are necessary the t as distinguished from those
pal governmen
erations.
provided by municipal enterprise op
Subdivision 7. Public Im rovement Projects. Public
improvement projects as defined in Chapter 26 of the Code.
Subdivision B. S ecial Assessment Fund. A fund setsuorto
finance and account for the construction
ffimP rovewholly or in
men
provision of services which are to be paid
part, from special assessments levied against benefitted
property.
0
O
27.02 special Projects Fund Established: PURPDSF
Suhdivisinn 1. 'I'hcrc is hereby csLahlishcd and created a
separate and special fund designated as the Special Projects
Fund, which the Clerk -Administrator and Finance Director -
Treasurer shall maintain on the official accounting records and
financial statements of the City and administer in accordance
with this ordinance. This fund may be used to make interest
bearing loans to finance public improvement projects authorized
pursuant to Chapter. 20 of the Code or to make interest bearing
loans to finance equipment purchases and/or capital improvement
projects, which have been included in the Long Term Financial
Plan, of any City enterprise fund.
Subdivision 2. This fund may also be used to make permanent
transfers for the purchase of equipment and/or to finance capital
improvement projects, which have been included in the Long Term
Financial Plan, of any City fund except special assessment and
enterprise funds. In no event shall this fund be used to finance
current and recurring general government operations and mainten-
ance expenses.
subdivision 3. This fund may be used to make permanent
transfers to the fund balance of the General Fund to ensure that
there exists a cash flow reserve and a reserve for contingen-
cies. The amounts of said reserves shall be determined by the
City Council.
/-.
subdivision 4. This fund may also be used to make emergency
�— repairs to the public utility system, City streets and highways,
municipal buildings, and machinery and equipment in the event
that monies for said repairs have not been previously budgeted
and/or that sr!fficienr monies are not available for said repairs
from other sources. In the event that the emergency repairs
needed are to assets accounted for in the Water Fund, Sewer Fund,
or any City enterprise fund the monies for said repairs shall be
in the form of an interest bearing tnan. At the option of the
Council monies used for repairs to assets accounted for in other
funds may be in the form of interest bearing loans or permanent
transfers. It shall be used for no other purpose and any monies
on deposit in the fund may be invested in accordance with
provisions of the City Charter and with applicable Minnesota
Statutes.
Subdivision 5. This fund may also be used to pay the bond
service charges of the paying agents of the bonds which were
formerly accounted for in the improvement Bond Redemption Fund
and which were defeased on January 18, 1984.
27.03 Funds To Be Deposited Therein
There shall he deposited in said fund the initial sum of
$ which represents the cash balance remaining in the
Ijprovement Bond Redemption Fund after the cash defeasance of
that fund's outstanding bonds. The special assessments
receivable of the •Improvement Bond Redemption Fund shall be
transferred to said fund and hereafter all future payments of
principal and interest on those assessments shall be deposited in
the fund. There may also be deposited in said fund such other
monies as may be directed by the Council.
27.04 Use of Funds
Subdivision 1. Upon the adoption of a resolution by 4/5 of
the entire Council, monies of the fund may be used for the
purposes stated in Section II above. In the event of an interest
bearing loan the resolution authorizing said loan shall state the
amount of the loan, its purpose, term, interest rate, and method
of repayment.
Subdivision 2. In the event of the purchase of equipment or
the financing of capital improvement projects, the authorizing
resolution shall state the amount of the purchase or financing,
shall contain a description of the equipment or project•, and
shall designate the fund to which the monies are to be
transfered.
Subdivision 3. In the event of emergency repairs the
authorizing resolution shall state the nature of the repairs, the
amount needed for said repairs and shall designate the fund to
which the monies are to be transferred. The authorizing
resolution shall also state that monies for said emergency
repairs had not previously been budgeted and that sufficient
monies are not available from other sources to finance said
emergency repairs
Subdivision 4. In the event of a permanent transfer to the
fund balance of the General Fund the authorizing resolution shall
state the amount of the transfer and shall indicate whether said
transfer is designated for the cash flow reserve or the reserve
for contingencies
27.05 Ammendment or Repeal
Upon the adoption of a resolution by 4/5 of the entire
Council this ordinance may be ammended or repealed. In the event
of repeal, monies accumulated in the Fund shall be deposited in
the General Fund.
Adopted this day of 1984.
ATTEST:
(SEAL)
Clerk -Administrator
ORDINANCE No. 354 lf(YJ7,- l l
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF MOUNDS VIEW
BY AMENDING CHAPTER 41 ENTITLED, "SPECIFIC RE7.ONINGS"
The Council of the City of Mounds View does hereby ordain:
SECTION I. 41.14. Pursuant to Chapter 40.23, the Official
Mounds View zoning map is hereby amended to reflect the following
rezoning:
Subdivision 1. That part of Lot 1, Block 10, Silver Lake
Woods, according to the recorded plat thereof, Ramsey County,
Minnesota described as follows:
Beginning at the most easterly corner of said Lot 1; thence
south 41 degrees 32 minutes 15 seconds west• on an assumed
bearing along the southeasterly line of said Lot 1, a
distance of 28.95 feet; thence southwesterly along the
southeasterly line of said Lot 1 on a tangential curve,
concave to the north, having a radius of 366.26 feet, a
central angle of 33 degrees 43 minutes 06 seconds, an arc
length of 215.54 feet, a chord of 212.44 and a chord bearing
of south 58 degrees 23 minutes 49 seconds west; thence north
48 degrees 29 minutes 33 seconds west, non -tangent to said
curve, a distance of 67.12 feet; thence north 0 degrees 00
minutes 30 seconds west, a distance of 111.85 feet; thence
north 41 degrees 30 minutes 27 seconds east, a distance of
148.48 feet to a point on the northeasterly line of said Lot
1, distant 203.00 feet northwesterly of the point of
beginning; thenr.R south 48 degrees 29 minutes 33 secons east
along said northwesterly line, a distance of 203.00 feet to
the point of beginning, is rezoned from I-1 to B-3.
This ordinance shall take effect thirty days after Lhe date
of its publication.
Read by the Council of the City of Mounds View on the 23rd
day of January, 1984.
Read and passed by the Council of the City of Mounds View
this day of , 1984.
ATTEST:
Mayor
(SEAL)
APPROVED AS TO FORM: Clerk -Administrator
City Attorney
RESOLUTION NO. 1704
CTTY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COIINTY OF RAMSEY
SPATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE MINOR SUBDIVISIDN
FOR THE BURGER KING CORPORATION
WHEREAS, the Burger King Corporation, M & E Realty Co., and
the Kraus Anderson Corporation have applied for a minor
subdivision of Lot 1, Block 10, Silver Lake Woods; and
WHEREAS, the two parcels as proposed, meet minimum Zoning
Code requirements; and
WHEREAS, the Mounds View Planning Commission has reviewed
this minor subdivision request and has recommended approval by
adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. 100-83;
NOW, THEREFORE„ BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View City
Council approves the minor subdivision request by the Burger King
Corporation, M & E Realty Co., and the Kraus Anderson Corporation
for Lot 1, Block 10, Silver Lake Woods;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this minor Subdivision is based
on the survey prepared by Wayne D. Cordes dated June 10, 1983,
Which includes both utility easements and utilityFand draiinage
easements as shown on this survey, a copy
Adopted this 23rd day of January, 1984.
ATTEST: Mayor T
(SEAL)
Clerk -Administrator
RESOLUTION NO. 1705
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO THE. BURGER
KING CORPORATION FOR A CONVENIENCE FOOD ESTABLISHMENT
WHEREAS, the Burger King Corporation has applied to the
City for approval to construct a convenience food establishment on
Parcel "A" of Lot 1, Block 10, Silver Lake Woods; and
WHEREAS, the City Council is presently in the process of
officially rezoning Parcel "A" of Lot 1, Block 10, Silver Lake
Woods from its existing 1-1 zone to a B-3 zone; and
WHEREAS, the construction of a convenience food establish-
ment requires a conditional use permit in a B-3 zoning district;
and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed this
conditional use permit request and has recommended approval by
adopting Resolution No. 100-83, noting that all conditions listed
under Chapter 40.17, Subdivision D(1) have been met; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed this conditional use
permit request and concurs with the Planning Commission's recom-
mendation;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View City
Council approves a conditional use permit for the Burger King
Corporation for the construction of a convenience food establish-
ment on Parcel A of Lot 1, Block 10, Silver Lake Woods provided
that:
1. Upon initial construction, a curb cut approximately 240
feet from the intersection of County Road I and Highway
10 shall be used for all ingress and egress traffic for
the Burger King facility.
2. At such time as improvements to County Road I,
including center median, are completed, a second curb
may be constructed between the initially constructed
curb cut and the intersection of County Road I and
Highway 10, as shown on the attached site plan.
3. During the one (1) year period following construction
of the second curb cut, should a traffic problem, as
determined by the City, arise as a result of this
second curb cut, this second curb cut will be closed
and the area finished similar to the adjacent areas
(landscaping, County Road I improvements, etc.).
Resolution No. 1705
Page Two
4. Landscaping shall be installed and maintained as shown
on the landscape plan submitted.
5. Payment of all City expenses above and beyond all
amounts previously submitted.
Adopted this 23rd day of January, 1984.
ATTEST:
Mayor
(SEAL) -----
Clerk-Administrator
RESOLUTION NO. 1703
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE. OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE, PLANNED
USE DEVELOPMENT FOR THE SILVER LAKE WOODS DEVELOPMENT
WHEREAS, as part of the planned unit development approved
by the City for the Silver. Lake Woods development, Lot 1, Block 2,
Tract F of Registered Land Survey No. 360, was designated as a B-2
zoning district; and
WHEREAS, the proposed use for this parcel within the
planned unit development was for an office building; and
WHEREAS, this parcel, as a result of platting, is known as
Lot 1, Block 10, Silver Lake Woods; and
WHEREAS, a portion of Lot 1, Block 10, Silver Lake Woods is
the proposed site for a Burger King restaurant; and
WHEREAS, a restaurant, as proposed, is inconsistant with
the original planned unit development designation of this parcel
as a B-2 zone with an office building as its proposed use; and
WHEREAS, the City has received correspondence from both
M 5 E Realty Co., and the Kraus Anderson Corporation agreeing to a
B-3 zoning on the portion of Lot 1, Block 10, proposed for the
Burger King restaurant and also to the amendment to the original
P.U.D. approved for the Silver Lake Woods development,
respectively; and
WHEREAS, the Mounds View Planning Commission has reviewed
this development request and the request to amend the P.U.D. as
previously approved by the City, and has recommended approval of
the amendment by adopting Planning Commission Resolution No.
100-83; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed this proposal and
concurs with the Planning Commission's recommendation;
Resolution No. 1703
Page Two
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View City
Council hereby approves the request by the Burger King Corporation
to amend the original planned unit development designation of
H-2/office for Parcel "A" (as shown on the surveyor certificate
prepared by Wayne D. Cordes dated June 10, 1983) of Lot 1, Block
10, Silver Lake Woods to now designate this Parcel "A" as
B-3/restaurant.
ATTEST:
(SEAL)
Adopted this 23rd day of January, 1984.
Clerk -Administrator
cam) r)
RESOLUTION NO. 1707
CITY OF MOUNDS YF.W
COUNTY OF RAMSEF.Y
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CLERK -ADMINISTRATOR
AND MAfl4-640WITHCUTE BURGERVKINGMENT AGREEMENT N0.
CORPORATION
WHEREAS, the Piounds View Municipal Code, Section 59.07,
requires development review for the construction requested by the
Burger King Corporation; and
WHEREAS, the Mounds View Planning Commission has reviewed
this development request and has recommended approval in their
adoption of Planning Commission Resolution No. 100-83; and
WHEREAS, the Mounds View City Council has reviewed the
development request and the recommended action by the City
Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, a copy of Development Agreement No. 84-64 is
attached to this resolution;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View City
with ryer King Corporation.
Council authorreement Nole84-64ministratorthe B11and Mayor to execute
Development Agreement
Adopted this 23rd day of January, 1984.
ATTEST: _ _
Mayor
(SEAL)
Clerk -Administrator
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
n STATE OF MINNESOTA
MOUNDS VIEW DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO.B4-64
BURGER KING COR> RATION
THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into this _ day of
19 , by and between the CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW,
County of Ramsey, State of Minnesota, party of the first part,
hereinafter called the "City",
and _the Burger King Corporation
party of the second part, hereinafter called the "Developer",
WITNESS ETIi:
WHEREAS, the Developer, in consideration of the
construction of a convenience food establishwent
and the issuance of per:rAts thereof, ,iereby agrees with the City to
perform all of the acts required herein and to conform to all of
the conditions set forth as follows:
1. Wherever the word "City" appears herein, it shall mean
and include the City of Mounds View and also said City's agents and
emlloyees; and wherever the word "Developer" appears herein, it
shall mean the developer, and any of its agents and employees.
Wherever the words "development site" appear herein, it shall mean
the premises described in the following exhibits:
Exhibit 1 (legal description)
Exhibit 2 (site plan C-3 and C-4)
Exhibit 3 (landscape plan )
Exhibit 4 (surveryor's certificate )
Exhibit 5 (Drainage structures performance bond of $1000)
Exhibit 6 (Building plans and specifications)
Rev. 4/13/81
i
the City in the processing, review and evaluation of the proposed
^ development and in the inspection of all work purformed pursuant
to said contract. Such costs shall include but not oe limi-.cd to
the administrative, legal, and engineering expenses incurred herein,
and such other expenses as authorized by said Chapter.
13. Developer agrccs that• the City can terminate development
of the development site or the construction or any building struc-
tures thereon if in the City council's opinion the terms of this
Development Contract have not been conformed to by the developer
and the said Developer herein agrees to cease construction and
waives its right of recourse, claim, suit or action against• the
City. In addition, in the event the Developer fails to conform to
the conditions of this Agreement, the City shall be entitled to
enforce it• pursuant• to the terms of this contract and/or the provi-
sions of the Mounds View Home Rule Charter, Chapter 26 of the
Municipal Code, or applicable Minnesota Statutes. The Developer
iieiei❑ dgrees that .in thu event Lhe City is compelled to C:nforca
any of the provisions of this contract by court action and judgment
is rendered in favor of the City, that all costs, disbursements
and reasonable attorney's fees will be paid by said Developer, its
heirs, successors and assigns.
14. The Developer shall furnish to the City at the time of
the execution of this Contract a cash bond, a corporate surety bond,
an irrevocable letter of credit or any other negotiable instrument
approved by the City Attorney, which the Developer agrees to keep in
full force and effect during the term of the obligation created
herein in the amount of seventy-two thousand (72,000)
�• Dollars, wherein the
-4-
., DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 84-64
EXHIBIT 2A
In addition to the foregoing conditions, Developer agrees to
the following:
1. Upon initial construction, a curb cut approximately
240 feet from the intersection of County Road I
and Highway 10 shall be used for all ingress and
egress traffic for the Burger King facility.
2. At such Lime as improvements to County Road I,
including center median, are completed, a second
curb may be constructed between the initially
constructed curb cut and the intersection of County
Road I and Highway 10, as shown on the attached site
plan.
3. During the one (1) year period following construction
of the second curb cut, should a traffic problem
arise as a result of this second curb cut, this
second curb cut will be closed and the area finished
similar to adjacent areas (landscaping, County Road I
improvements, etc.).
4. Payment of all City expenses above and beyond all
amounts previously submitted.
FOR THE CITY:
Date:
Date:
i`J
FOR THE DEVELOPER:
�kci /6
Cif ofVoodIg W
RAMSEY COUNTY, MINN E SOT
24D1 HIGHWAY 10
MOUNDS VIEW, MINN. 55112
)OF9055
January 18, 1984
Mr. and Mrs. Rol Gale
8227 Groveland Road
Minneapolis, GIN 55432
Ms. Debra Yost
8205 Groveland Road
Minneapolis, MN 55432
Dear Mr. L Mrs. Gale and Ms. Yost:
Attached please find a memo from the Director of Public works/
Community Development to the City Council, along with a sketch
prepared by my staff concerning the feasibility of the construc-
tion of a cul-de-sac, with utilities, to service three lots on
property both you and your neighbor own.
This item will be discussed at the City Council Agenda Session
meeting on February 6, 1984 at which time the City Council
would like word from you whether you wish to proceed with the
subdivision and construction of the cul-de-sac with accompanying
utilities.
Please review the attached memo and sketch. Note that the cost
figures listed in Mr. Johnson's memo are purely estimates and
you will be responsible for the actual costs of the improvements
should you elect to proceed with tlilS development. The F111d11CC
Director has formulated figures of what the approximate annual
payments would be if the improvements were constructed by the
City as part of a public improvements project and the cost of
the improvements would be assessed to the property owners over
a ten year period. These figures are shown on the attached page.
If you have any questions concerning this item, please contact
the undersigned.
J iliV GiY,
CIT O MOU
Don F. P
Clerk-Admin
DFP/pf
Attachment
"I — MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: John C. Johnson
DATE: January 1G, 1984
SUBJECT: FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS ON FAIRCHILD
AVENUE NORTHERLY OF LAPORT DRIVE
Attached is a sketch showing the layout that staff developed for
the two vacant properties lying southerly of the Gale Addition
and northwesterly of the intersection of Laport Drive and
Fairchild Avenue. As can be seen by the layout, staff has
developed a plan that would allow development of three lots with
each lot having at least the 11,000 square feet required by City
Code. The northerly lot will have a dramatically reduced
building envelope due to rear yard and front yard setback require-
ments and may require consideration of variances prior to issuance
of building permits. The cul-de-sac was kept as confined as
possible to minimize necessary improvement costs and at the same
time maximize utilization of the property in question. The
subdivision will require relocation of the garage which serves
the existing home on the northerly lot.
Staff has reviewed the probable cost of construction of the
proposed improvements and it is as follows:
1. Installation of sanitary sewer main with
three sewer services $ 6,400.00
2. Installation of 6 inch water main with
two gate valves, one fire hydrant and
three services $ 7,400.00
3. Paving and concrete curb and gutter of
cul-de-sac $ 6,300.00
4. Clearing, grubbing, and grading $ 4,800.00
With 15% contingencies the estimated construction cost is $28,600.00.
It is estimated that associated project costs such as engineering,
administrative fees, financing fees, and inspection costs will
run approximately 35% for a total estimated project cost of
$38,600.00. This works out to approximately $12,900.00 per lot
for cost of improvements.
The above costs do not include those costs that would be associated
with the subdivision of the parcels in question. The subdivision
would require a legal land survey and preparation of a subdivision
plat. This plat would require the cooperation of both property
owners in as such one of the lots is divided or is situated across
the existing common property line.
M
Mayor and City Council
Page Two
January 16, 1984
Staff review of singl,c lamily lots currently on the market or in
the recent past in Mounds View has sold for in the neighborhood of
$20,000 to $25,000, depending on geographic location, size of lot
and amenities within or adjacent to the lot. Staff, therefore,
concludes that the proposed subdivision of three lots and the
necessary public improvements would appear feasible.
It would appear, based on feedback from the respective property
owners, that the council could decide on whether to move ahead
with ordering the public improvements as outlined above. Prior
to ordering said improvements, staff advises that• the Council
require that the applicant initiate the subdivision process as
noted on the plan with the dedication of the required rights -of -
way for the public improvements. The other option the Council
has would be to allow the improvements be installed privately
and dedicated as part of the plat improvements to the City of
Mounds View.
The above analysis assumed that drainage from the properties in
question would be as follows: Street and right-of-way drainage
would traverse easterly on Laport Drive to an existing pair of
storm sewer catch basins approximately 3� lots to the east of
Fairchild Avenue. The drainage from the homes and the side and
rear lots would drain to a common detention facility that would be
located to the rear of the new lots and which would outlet along
the northerly property line in conjunction with the drainage
facility constructed as part of the Gale Addition.
JCJ/bc
Attachment
LOi• 1
Yr, Prin. Int. Total-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
LOT 2
1'r. Prin. Int.- Total yr
1,309.18
1,309.18
1,309.18
1,178.26
2,618.36
2,487.44
1
2
1,296.10
1,296.10
2,592.20
1
1,240.72
1,309.18
1,047.34
2,356.52
3
1,296.10
1296.10
1,166.49
1,036.88
2,462.59
2
1,240.72
1,309.18
1,309.18
916.42
785.51
2,225.60
4
1,296.10
907.27
2,332,98
2,203.37
3
4
1,240.72
1,240.72
1,309.18
654.59
2,094.69
1,963.77
5
6
1296,10
1'296.10
777.66
2,073.76
5
1,240.72
1,309.18
523.67
1,S32.85
7
1'296.10
648.05
51S.44
1,944.15
1,814.54
6
7
1,240.72
1,309.18
1,309.17
392.75
261.84
1,701.93
1,571.01
8
1:296.10
'
388.83
1,684.93
8
1,240.72
1,240.72
1,309.17
130.92
1,440.09
9
10
1,296.11
1,296.11
259.22
129.61
1,555.33
9
1,240.72
13,091.78
7,200.48
O,292.26
12,961.02
7,128.SS
1,425.72
TO,0 99.51
10
1,240.72
12,407.20
TOTAL - ALL LOTS
Yr. Prin. Int. Total
1 3,846.00 3,846.00 7,692.00
2 3,846.00 3,461.40 7,307.40
3 3,846.00 3,076.80 6,922.80
4 3,846.00 2,692.20 6,538.20
5 3,846.00 2,307.60 6,153.60
6 3,846.00 1,923.00 5,769.00
7 3,846.00 1,538.40 5,394.40
8 3,846.UU 1,153.80 4,999.80
9 3,846.00 769.20 4,615.20
10 3,846.00 384.60 4,230.60
38,460.00 21,153.00 59,613.00
LOT
1,240.72
1,116.65
992.58
868.50
744.43
620.36
496.29
372.22
248.14
124.07
6,823.96
2,e
2,2
2,2
2,1
1,9
1,8
1,7
1,6
1.4;
y
ORDINANCE NO. 353
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF MOUNDS VIEW BY
AMENDING CHAPTER 41 ENTITLED, "SPECIFIC REZONINGS"
The Council of the City of Mounds View does hereby ordain:
SECTION I. 41.13 Pursuant to Chapter 40.23, the Official
Mounds View Zoning Map is hereby amended to reflect the following
rezoning:
Subdivision 1.
Registered Land Survey No. 389, Tract B, is rezoned from
R-1 to R-2.
This ordinance shall take effect thirty days after the date
of its publication.
Read by the City Council of the City of Mounds View on this
f^� 9th day of January 1984.
.,,.., Read and passed by the City Council of the City of Mounds
View this day of 1984.
ATTEST:
r
(SEAL)
Clerk -Administrator
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
CITY COUNCIL
/ AGENDA SESSION
February 6, 1984
7:00 P.M.
1. Discussion of Highway 10 Radiator Shop lawsuit with Greg
Johnson and Attorney (City Attorney Meyers will be present).
2. Presentation by Dave Goblirsch of Springsted, Inc. on the
results of the Improvement Bond Redemption Fund Defeasance.
3. Discussion of ordinance No. 356 Establishing Chapter 27 of
the Municipal Code Entitled, "Special Projects Fund" and
staff memorandum.
4. Appointment of City Council and citizen representative
to Rice Creek Watershed District Citizens 509 Task Force
(information included in 1/4/84 packet).
5. Consideration of Resolution No. 1710 a Resolution Establishing a
Community Energy Council and Participation in the Governor's
Community Energy Program and the appointment of Council. members.
6. Consideration of staff memorandum regarding Planning Commission
vacancies.
7. Consideration of staff memorandum regarding Labor Relations
Subscriber Service.
8. Consideration of staff memorandum regarding Highway 10
Pedestrian Signalization Timing Study.
9. Consideration of staff meiiiorai'wu-11 rc ardinn North Star Racetrack
(aka Minnesota Meadows) Site Review.
10. Consideration of staff memorandum regarding Pinecrest Properties.
11. Consideration of Mayor's memorandum regarding infrastructure
capacities and staff memorandum.
12. Authorize contract to Mounds View Printing for 1984 Newsletter.
13. Consideration of staff memorandum regarding Groveland Park
rink supervision.
14. Consideration of staff memorandum regarding Director of Public
Works/Community Development (information will be provided at
meeting).
-,3
TO: Mayor & City Council
i
FROM: Clerk-Administrdt�
DATE: January 30, 1984
SUBJECT: Special Projects Fund
As a result of the discussion centering around the repealer
clause of ordiance No. 356 establishing the Special Projects
Fund, staff would like to respond to the concerns voiced by
Councilmember Doty. As we understand it, Councilmember Doty
voiced concerns about the following two basis issues,
1. The current repealer clause provides for all re-
maining funds to be deposited in the General Fund
which Councilmember Doty feels releases the Council
in office at that time from determining how the
funds would be specifically used.
2. It is Councilmember Doty's desire that the funds
resulting from the dafeasance of the Improvements
Bond Redemption Fund be returned to the taxpayers
of Mounds View from which a portion of the funds
came due to the special tax levy.
It is staff's thoughts that the deposit of these funds in the
General Fund is consistent with Mr. Doty's desires that the
dcfeas,ncr monies be returned to the taxpayers as the General
Fund is by intent designed to fund those services which directly
or indirectly benefit all of the communities residents. Other
funds cannot necessarily be said to do the same.
We agree that the Council repealing the enabling ordinance i:oY
the Special Projects Fund should be required to stipulate how the
funds would be used. we feel that this can best be accomplished
by requiring that when that Council repeals the Ordinance, the
remaining funds be deposited in the General Fund with the
resolution specifying the purposes for which the funds would be
expended.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff would recommend that the Council amend
Ordinance No. 356 by adding the following to the last sentence
in Section 27.05; "...with the resolution authorizing repeal
specifying the purpose(s) for which the funds would be expended."
DP/mb
MEMO T0: Mayor and City Coun
FROM: Clerk-Administrato
DATE: January 26, 1984
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION NO. 1710 ESTABLISHING A COMMUNITY ENERGY COUNCIL
Attached is a copy of Resolution No. 1710 Establishing a Community
Energy Council and Participation in the Governor's Community Energy
Program. This resolution is prepared pursuant to discussions at
the January 23rd Council Meeting.
Should you find this resolution acceptable, staff would request
that you determine which applicants to the Energy Council you
wish to appoint for the different terms of office, i.e., two to
expire in 1984 and 1985 and three to expire in 1986, and the
individual you wish to have appointed to the Chairperson position.
RECOMMENDATION: staff would recommend adoption of Resolution
No. 1710 and appointment of the five current applicants to the
Energy Council.
' DFP/pf
Attachment
RESOLUTION NO. 1710
ciq,y MOUNDS VIE
COUNTY
NTY OF RAPISF.Y
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING A COMMUNITY ENERGY COUNCIL AND
PARTICIPATION IN THE GOVERNOR'S COMMUNITY ENERGY PROGRAM
WHEREAS, the City of mounds
cView
es andpromotes
the sethe
conservation
and efficient use of energy
energy resources within the community; and
WHEREAS, in response to the increasing concern about
bo tenergy#
it is desirable to establish an Energy
ipate in
the Governor's Community Energy Council.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Mounds View that this community shall participate in the
Governor's Community Energy Program and hereby establish an
Energy Council as follows:
Subdivision 1. TITLE: This organization shall be known
as the Mounds View Energy Council.
Subdivision 2. SCOPE: The scope of activity of the Energy
Council shall be to inform the City Council and thecommunity's
' citizens regarding matters relevant tonenergy
or anduse,
conccot energy
and renewable energy resources, to nt and to work with other
related programs, projects, and events,
•,, fumed in other communities, the Governor's Office,
energy counc=-� forming
and the Department of Energy and Economic DeveiopmenL �n
state energy policy and legislation.
^f the Energy
Subdivision 3, PURPOSE: The genera
conservation and develop -
Council is to promote and encourage energy local efforts and ev
ment of renewable energy resources both by
by
providing input into state energy policy.
subdivision 4. COMPOSITION: The Council shall be composed
of a Chairperson and 6 members, all of whom sha'_1 be appointed and
serve as set forth in Subdivision 5.
Subdivision 5. MEMBERS --METHOD OF SELECTION--TEOF
OFFICE--
QUALIFICATIONS: The Chairperson shall be appointed ann
by
the Mayor with majority consent of the City Council. The Chair-
person shall assure fulfillment of the following responsibilities
in addition to those otherwise described herein:
(1) Preside over meetings of the Energy Council.
RESOLUTION NO. 1710
Page Two
(2) Provide liaison with the Governor's Community
Energy Program and with other governmental and
volunteer units in matters relating to energy
conservation and renewable energy development.
Vice Chairperson: A Vice Chairperson shall be appointed by the
Chairperson. The Vice Chairperson shall perform such duties as
may be assigned by the Chairperson and shall assume responsibilities
of the Chairperson in the absence of the Chairperson.
Member's Term of Office: Members of the Energy Council shall be
appointed by the Mayor with majority consent of the Council for three
year staggered terms; at least two of these terms, but not more
than three terms, shall expire each year on December 31. Any person
appointed to fill a vacancy occurring prior to the expiration of the
term for which his/her predecessor was appointed shall be appointed
only for the remainder of such term. Upon expiration of his/her
term of office, a member shall continue to serve until his/her
successor is appointed.
Representation Requirements: Energy Council members shall be
representative of the community's population. Representatives from
the following community sectors could be considered for council
membership: education, community organizations, community action
agencies, representatives from organizations of low-income people,
business, industry, finance, labor or building trades, architecture
or engineering, energy suppliers, citizen groups, and representa-
tives from minority groups.
Qualifications for Membership: Members of the Energy Council shall
be residents of the City of Mounds View while serving on the Council
and shall represent a broad range of interests in energy conserva-
tion and renewable energy development.
Resignations --Removal from Office --Vacancies: Energy Council members
may resign voluntarily or be removed from office by the Mayor with
consent of the majority vote of the City Council. Three consecutive
unexcused absences from duly called Energy Council meetings shall
constitute automatic resignation from office. Vacancies in the
Energy Council shall be filled by mayoral appointment with majority
consent of the City Council.
Compensation: Energy Councilmembers shall serve without compensation.
Subdivision 6. MEETINGS: The Energy Council shall hold
regular meetings at least monthly with the date and time to be deter-
mined by the Energy Council. Special meetings may be called by the
Chairperson.
`qd
RESOLUTION NO. 1710
Page Three
Subdivision 7. EX OFFiCIO MEMBERS: The Mayor or her/his
Council member appointee and a City staff person shall serve as an
ex officio member of the Energy Council privileged to speak on any
matter but without a vote, and shall provide a liaison between
the Energy Council and the City Council.
Adopted this 13th day of February, 1984.
ATTEST:
Mayor
(SEAL)
Clerk -Administrator
41
�'l. It, Z'
' MEMO T0: Mayor and City Co;;
FROM: Clerk_
Administrat
DATE: January 26, 1984
SUBJECT: PLANNING COMMISSION VACANCIES
Pursuant to your direction at the January 23rd Council Meeting,
I contacted Planning Commission Chairperson Peg Mountin to
determine the reasoning for the Planning Commission recommending
the appointment of three individuals to the Commission to increase
its membership to nine members. Mrs. Mountin indicated that the
Commission did discuss the matter in depth, that all members were
individually polled on the issue and that it was a unanimous
decision of the Commission to recommend the appointment of the
three applicants to increase the membership to nine for the
following reasons:
1. The Commission feels that they have in the past worked well
with nine members and that nine members do not create any
operational problems.
2. The addition of these three individuals to the Commission
would give greater representation to the area of the City
e south of Highway 10 whereas current membership is more towards
the north half of the City.
None of the applicants were issue oriented and each of them
individually desired to be on the Commission due to then
interests in serving the City and being a member of the
Planning Commission.
4. The Commission members felt that each of these individuals
would provide a different knowledge and experience base to
the Commission which would be of benefit to them during
their activities.
Mrs. Mountin reiterated the request of the Commission that the
three applicants to the Planning Commission be appointed thus
increasing the membership of the Planning Commission to nine
members and emphasized that she felt that this increased member-
ship would in no way diminish the effectiveness of the Commission
or their ability to deal with the issues before them.
DFP/pf
C
MEMO TO: Mayor and City Counc'1
FROM: Clerk -Administrator
DATE: January 26, 1984 \\
SUBJECT: LABOR RELATIONS SUBSCRIBER SERVICE
Attached please find a memo from Mr. Jim Miller, Chairman of the
M.A.M.A. Committee on Labor Relations Subscriber Service Contracts,
the Memorandum of Agreement for Providing Technical Assistance
in Labor Management Relations to Cities, and a billing statement
from the League of Minnesota Cities in the amount of $1,560.00 for
Labor Relations services during 1984. Due to the benefits that the
City of Mounds View derives from participation in this service and
the reasonable rates for such service, staff would recommend
authorization to remit these fees. we would like to point out that
the 1984 Budget provides for $1,550.00 for this service and the
bill is in the amount of $1,560.00, however, staff feels that these
monies will be available as a result of shortfalls in other areas
in the Administration Budget.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff would
remit $1,56o.00 to the League
' Relations Subscriber Service
DFP/pf
Attachments
recommend Council authorization to
of Minnesota Cities for the Labor
during 1984.
7
TO: METROPOLITAN AREA MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION MEMBERS
AND LABOR RELATIONS SUBSCRIBER SERVICE MEMBERS
FROM: JAMES F. MILLER, CHAIRMAN
MAMA COMMITTEE ON LA80R RELATIONS SU85CRIBER
SERVICE CONTRACTS
2 y•
DATE: JANUARY 9, 1984
SUBJ: LABOR RELATIONS SUBSCRIBER SERVICE
The MAMA Board recently appointed Jerry Dulgar, Jack Irving,
and me, to renegotiate the agreement between the league of
Minnesota Cities and Labor Relations Associates, Inc., for
special subscriber services. Assisting in that negotiation
was Vern Peterson from the Association of Metropolitan Muni-
cipalities. As a result of those negotiations, the fee schedule
will be increased for 1984-1985, by 5% as follows:
Population Category 1983-1984 Fee 1984-1985 Fee
Under 5,000 § 700 $ 735
5,000 - 9,999 1,060 1,110
10,000 - 14,999 1,485 1.,560
15,000 - 19,999 1,970 2,070
20,000 - 29,999 2,545 2,670
Over - 30,000 3,175 3,335
Invoices and copies of the 1984-85 agreement are being sent to
all cities currently using the special subscriber services.
Those MAMA cities not using the special subscriber services
will receive a copy of this letter and copies of the 1984-85
agreement. If a non -subscribing city wishes to use the special
subscriber services, they may do so by remitting the appropriate
fee to the League of Minnesota Cities - Labor Relations Subscri-
ber Service. Population is based upon most recent Metropolitan
Council population estimates. Remittance of the special subscri-
ber fee should be forwarded to the League of Minnesota Cities
by no later than March 1, 1984.
Services provided by the Labor Relations Subscription Service
include:
General Membership Services
This agreement provides for two types of labor rela-
tions services. The first is "general membership
services" for cities that are members of the League
of Minnesota Cities and Association of Metropolitan
Muniipontri-
butecanaamount toathe ch olabor sservicesZfund nc on behalf
LABOR RELATION'S SUBSCRIBIiIt - 2 -
SERVICE MEMBERS
1. General Membership Services (continued)
January 9, 1984 /_ I
of their respective memberships. The "general member-
ship services" part of the agreement provides for:
articles in the League of Minnesota Cities Magazine;
general advice and assistance by telephone or corres-
pondence; one personal conference; advice on arbi-
trator's selection; and advice and assistance to the
League of Minnesota Cities staff relating to proposed
or adopted State and Federal legislation. The AMM
services include meetings, telephone calls, review
of proposals and counter -proposals with regard to the
fforts, and
members
theor relatins metropolitanecities labor eneral relations
or -
relations
polls.
Special Subscriber Services
The second part of the agreement provides for special
subscriber services. The contract language emphasizes
joint bargaining. The agreement also provides that
the consultant (Labor Relations Associates, Inc.)
will advise subscribers in their individual negoti-
tions, mediation and/or arbitration efforts. How-
ever, if Labor Relations Associates, Inc. staff is
to be involved in the attendance CorFpreparat�ionvfor
al
attendance at such individual ,
subscriber will be billed accordingly.
Seminar on Labor Matters
This year, a new service provided will be a seminar
on a labor issue mutually agreed on by Labor Rela-
tions Associates, Inc., and the MAMA Board. The
consultant will provide this seminar at his own cost,
which should help to insure affordability.
The ongoing administration of the agreement will be the primary
responsibility of the Executive Director of the League of Minne-
sota Cities. The LMC Labor Relations Subscriber Service Con-
tract Committee may exercise its general jurisdiction over the
agreement.
If there are any questions regarding the 1984-85 agreement, please
call me, and members of the Committee, Don Slater or Vern Peterson.
Sincerely,
James F. Miller
City Manager
JFM/ms City of Minnetonka
Attach: Memo of Agreement
MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT FOR
PROVIDING TFUNICAL ASSISTANCE IN
LABOR MANAGEMENT RELATIONS TO CITIES
The League of Minnesota Cities (LMC), acting for itself and
on behalf of the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities
(AMM) and cities which subscribe to the special subscriber
labor relations service herein described, hereby enters into
a program of technical assistance in labor management rela-
tions to be provided by Labor Relations Associates, Inc.,
hereinafter known as the Consultant.
2. GENERAL LMC MEMBERSHIP SERVICE
A. The Consultant, upon consultation with the staff of
the League, and the concurrence of the league as a
subject matter, will prepare not less than eight (8)
original articles suitable for publication in the
monthly Minnesota Cities, and will revise and update
the LMC memo �DIbE�7UBLIC EMPLOYMENT LABOR RELA-
TIONS, explaining in ayman s .anguage t e provisions
o ppropriate state statutes governing relations be-
tween local government employers and employees, the
rules and regulations of PERB and the Bureau of,Medi-
ation Services, and a representative sampling of
arbitration decisions. Additionally, the Consultant
will rote and comment upon current state and national
trends and patterns in public sector iabui managc,cnt'
relations generally. All work products (such as cor-
re�pnndenC?; leeal briefs, arbitration decisions
nr,.ri CP_
evaluations' research reports) collected or c.....--••--
developed in conjunction with.the services outlined
herein shall remain the prcperty of the League and
not of the Consultant.
B. The Consultant will provide general advice and assis-
tance to city officials concerning their individual
labor relations problems by telephone and correspon-
dence. Additionally, any League member not a subscri-
ber will be entitled to one personal conference without
charge during the lifetime of this Agreement so long
as that conference is held in the Consultant's office
or some mutually convenient site in the Twin Cities
metropolitan area.
C. The Consultant will provide advice and assistance to
the League, its Board of Directors, its staff, and its
committees concerning state and federal legislation
governing relations between local government employers
and employees.
-1-
D. The Consultant will provide general and specific ,
advice, assistance and training to the League's
Labor Relations Service in all areas of labor
relations.
3. SPECIAL SUBSCRIBER SERVICES
Labor Relations Associates, Inc. agrees to provide special
subscriber services, in addition to those general member-
ship services enumerated above, to those Twin Cities metro-
politan area cities which subscribe to this special service.
These services include the following:
A. one principal of the Consultant firm will partici-
pate with subscriber cities in joint negotiations,
mediation and/or arbitration involving two or more
subscribers and a common union when the Metropolitan
Area Management Association (MAMA) is named as the
city's representative.
B. The Consultant wi11 not charge for time involved in
joint bargaining for two or more subscribers dealing
with a common union, nor for subscriber individual
bargaining efforts which do not involve the Consultant
in bargaining, mediation or arbitration sessions.
C. Telephone calls, meetings, provision of data, recom-
mendations and other general activities with subscri-
bers invol-volthe labor relations efforts either
with elected or appointed officials will be conducted
and provided without charge.
D. The Consultant will advise subscribers in their indi-
vidual negotiations, mediation and/or arbitration
efforts. Any attendance or preparation for attendance
at such individual efforts will be individually billed
to the subscribers.
is
E. The Consultant will assist in the preparation of wage and
fringe benefit data, contract language, analysis of
arbitration decisions, selection of arbitrators, meet
with elected officials and generally assist subscribers
in dealing with their collective bargaining efforts.
F. The Consultant shall, if authorized by the Labor Rela-
tions Subscriber Service Contract Committee, provide
assistance or participation in negotiations, mediation,
or arbitration of a subscriber -union dispute not covered
by this Agreement provided that the problem may have a
pattern_ setting impact upon collective bargaining gen-
erally in the Twin Cities area.
-2-
The Committee will be comprised as follows:
1. Ex-Officio Members
Executive Director of the League of Minnesota
Cities
Executive Director of the Association of Metro-
politan Municipalities
2. Regular Members
One representative appointed by the Executive
Director of the League of Minnesota Cities
One representative appointed by the Executive
Director of the Association of Metropolitan
Municipalities
Three representatives appointed by the President
of MAMA.
G. The Consultant shall provide at least one seminar per
year on a labor issue mutually agreed on by the Con-
sultant and the MAMA Board, at direct cost. Any unanti-
cipated revenue derived above the cost of such a semi-
nar, will revert to the Sepcial Subscriber Service
Account with the League of Minnesota Cities for future
seminars.
4. ADMINISTRATION OF CONTRACT
The Consultant will prepare and submit `monthly
-crivito the
League,
sup -
written summary reports inUltati..r
port of this Agreement, including the amount of time spent
therein, and will, from time to time, make oral reports to
n_,_,,'O- Subscriber Service Contract Committee
t IIC LilbVr R La uV ,G b-_.
regarding all phases of this agreement. Day-to-day liaison
will be maintained between the League and the Consultant
through the League's Executive Director or his agent who
will be responsible for the administration of this Agree-
ment.
5. TERMS OF AGREEMENT
The terms of this Agreement shall commence March 15, 1984
and end March 14, 1985.
A. A fixed retainer charge of $2,037 dollars per month
shall be paid to the Consultant. This amount repre-
sents monies needed to cover office overhead and mis-
cellaneous support services to the technical assis-
tance program.
-3-
An hourly time, material and expense charge for con-
sulting services rendered by a principal member at
the rate of $34.39 dollars per hour, by an associate
member at the rate of $19.95 dollars per hour, and by
a research assistant at the rate of $13.13 dollars
per hour.
The sum of all such compensation in A and B.(above)
shall not exceed the total fees paid in support of
this Agreement for the 1984-1985 Agreement year.
Exhibit A lists the current contributors and shows
anticipated fees, although this is subject to change
during the Agreement through the addition or deletion
of subscribers.
D. Services provided by the Consultant which are outside
of the scope of this Agreement and which are provided
to those agencies participating in special subscriber
servicesshall be billed at the rate of $48.30 dollars
per hour..
Cancellation Clause
This Agreement may be terminated by either party upon
thirty (30) days written notice.
F. An LMC/AMM/MAMA committee shall be established to review
the service and the relationship of the organizations
to it.
FO THE LEAGUE OF INNESOTA CITIES: FOR LABOR RELATIONS ASSO-
/1 �CIft1'ES�. N
ecutive Director rest e t
Dated thisday of
1984
0�
-4-
Dated this �Cr —day of
rb yyr—�, 1984
MI
EXHIBIT A
Metro Council
Population Est,
Subscriber
1984-85
Fee
As Of 12 1 82
Community
$
2,070.00
15,560
Anoka .........................
3,335.00
30,390
Blaine ........................
3,335.00
81,870
Bloomington ...................
3,335.00
30,820
Brooklyn Center .............
3,335.00
45,280
Brooklyn Park .................
3,335.00
36,910
Burnsville ..................
735.00
3,350
Circle Pines ..................
2,070.00
19,670
Columbia Heights ..............
2,070.00
19,650
Cottage Grove .................
2,670.00
24,910
Crystal .......................
735.00
3,680
Deephaven.....................
2,070.00
18,120
Eden Prairie ..................
3,335.00
45,370
Edina .........................
735.00
2,470
Excelsior .................•...
735.00
4,770
Forest Lake ...................
2,670.00
29,920
Fridley .......................
2,670.00
22,380
Golden Valley .................
1,560.00
12,790
Hastings ............... „ •....
2,070.00
15,040
Hopkins .......................
2,070.00
17,610
Inver Grove Heights...........
2,670.00
27,190
Maplewood .....................
39,270
Minnetonka ....................
1,560.00
12,520
Mounds View ...................
,670.00
2,670.00
2
23,220
New Brighton ..................
22,880
New Hepd................... ;,,
,0.00
11,56560.00
11,900
North St. Paul ............. ••
11560.00
12,620
Oakdale..:.:. •..............
I,335.00
6,820
Orono .........................
3,335.00
37,230
Richfield .....................
1,560.00
14,030
Robbinsdale....................
3,335.00
35,570
Roseville .....................
1,110.00
7,740
St. Anthony ...................
3,335.00
42,340
St. Louis Park ................
1,560.00
10,230
Shakopee.........
2,070.00
18,400
West. St. Paul ................
2,670.00
22,480
White Bear Lake ...............
Municipalities
3,270.00
Assn Metropolitan
3,270.00
League of Minnesota Cities
Total 1984-1985 Fees.......... $
87,590.00
Population Category
Under
5,000
5,000 -
9,999
10,000 -
14,999
15,000 -
19,999
20,000 -
29,999
Over
30,000
1983Fee
$ 700
1,060
1,485
1,970
2,545
3,175
1984-1985 Fee
$ 735
1,110
1,560
2,070
2,670
3,335
of minnesota cities
January 19, 1984
Mr. Donald Pauley
City Manager
City of Mounds View
2401 Highway #10
Mounds View, Minnesota 55112
Dear Mr. Pauley:
The amount due for the Labor Relations Subscriber Service for the year
March 15, 1984 through March 14, 1985 is:
$ 1,560.00.
This ement to
MINNESOTAnt is CITIESayable — LABORnreceipt of this RELATIONS SUBSCRIBERtSERVICE the LEAGUE OF
hfc
559 01 -560O
f612) 227
� ,,.88
MEMO TO: Mayor and City Couk\\
FROM: Clerk-AdministratoI
DATE: January 26, 1984
SUBJECT: HIGHWAY 10 PEDESTRIAN SIGNALIZATION TIMING STUDY
On the afternoon of January 24, 1984 I met with Mr. Mike Robinson and
Mr. Kurt Gobeli at the District 9 office of the Minnesota Department
of Transportation regarding the results of their Highway 10 pedes-
trian signalization timing study. As you will recall, this study
was precipitated as a result of a report by Mr. Neil Murray on
On Your Behalf that pedestrians are unable to cross the entire width
of Highway 10 at the Silver Lake Road intersection.
Mr. Murray's observations are correct and it is the present policy
of the Minnesota Department of Transportation, according to
Mr. Mike Robinson, that pedestrian signalization timing is such
that a pedestrian would be able to cross only one-half of the
width of Highway 10 during one timing cycle. The Department of
Transportation evaluated the timing cycles to determine what would
be necessary to allow the pedestrian to cross the entire width of
Highway 10 within one timing cycle and what the impacts on vehicular
traffic would be as a result of the increased signalization timing.
As a result of this evaluation, it was the determination of the
Department of Transportation that, on an experimental basis, the
pedestrian signals at all signalized intersections on Highway 10
in Mounds view will be increased from an 18 to 34 second interval
which would allow a pedestrian to cross the entire width of the
roadway. The changes in the timing will occur sometime before this
summer and will run through the entire summer in order that the
Department would be able to evaluate the impacts on vehicular
traffic flows. There is a possibility that due to the manner in
which traffic signals operate,using detection devices and timing
clocks,that certain portions of signals for vehicular traffic would
be cancelled when pedestrians are crossing the highway, however,
these would only occur on the left turn signals and should not
create any significant impacts on vehicular flows.
Mr. Robinson is preparing an article for the City Newsletter for
publication in the March Newsletter regarding this change in
signalization and will be meeting with the residents of the
elderly/handicapped housing project to advise them of the changes
also. Staff will be developing information regarding traffic
safety and pedestrian crossings for the School District to distri-
bute in the spring of the year before children are out on summer
vacation.
Attached to this
placed at all of
of the meaning of
Mr. Robinson will
determination of
in a letter to me
its receipt.
DFP/pf
Attachment
-2-
memorandum is a photocopy of a sign that will be
the pedestrian signal lights advising the user
the walk and don't walk signal lights.
be confirming the results of our meeting and the
the Department of Transportation on this matter
, copies of which will be provided to you upon
•
m4o", °T4yo INI1III 1csoIiI
n a 1)epal'lill(+111 OI 11'illlti�)(11'lillll)Il
^' �tiA ay� ;3•�ti.; ��ill��l'\' .\\'l'lllll' \111'I�I. IiOX 30511
1( , OFTRP N(ll•111 SL I'OO. \Illll)(:tilllil .�.rlO�,;,•'.
7�0
January 25, 1984 f..'.'
Mr. Donald F. Pauley
Clerk -Administrator
City of Mounds View
2401 Highway 10 — -'
Mounds View, Minnesota 55112
Dear Mr. Pauley:
SUBJECT: S.P. 62011 (TH 10)
Signal Timing Changes
Mr. Curtis Gobeli and I appreciated the opportunity to meet with you
yesterday to discuss our proposed experimental signal timing changes on
the T.H. 10 coordinated signal system. Your insight into the pedestrian
crossing patterns along T.H. 10 and future land use development in
Mounds View is quite helpful.
As we discussed, Mn/DOT is responding to (1) local concerns about the
existing pedestrian timing scheme of crossing the highway in two separate
sequences -- first to the median and then across the far side and (2) our
concern about the possibility of pedestrians crossing half way and not
being able to reach the median push button due to high snow banks. The
local concerns center around summertime activity when kids cross T.H. 10
at Silver Lake Road an Heir uay to the bnanh on Spring Lake and perhaps
other recreational facilities. The snow bank problem isproportional
to the snowfall each winter, and due to other plowing priorities,
difficult to keep snow cleared from push buttons.
se the
Five signals along T.H.
arecoordinated
vehiclesdwith throughach other the area.toAsnyouaknow,
efficiency of moving platoons
traffic volumes are extremely high and congestion occurs during peak
periods. If the efficiency of moving T.N. 10 traffic is reduced, further
congestion and conflicts will occur. Depending upon the level of dis-
ruption, those conflicts could turn into accidents. For, these reasons,
we are hesitant to compromise the efficiency of the traffic signal timing
settings presently inplace in this system. We do, however, want to be
responsive to the pedestrian concerns identified al Therefore,
low rweare
'developing revised signal timing plans
ians
enough time to cross the entire highway in one cycle.
.In rqual OpparundU• L•)riplgrrr
Mr. Donald F. Pauley
Page Two
January 25, 1984
We plan on implementing the revised timing plans sometime this Spring and
we will evaluate the effects on traffic as well as pedestrians. I must
emphasize that we are doing this on an experimental basis. If significant
problems develop, we will change the timing back to the present settings.
If no significant problems are observed, we will leave the revised timing
plan inplace.
While we are not aware of any existing pedestrian accident problem along
T.H. 10, we believe there is a widespread misunderstanding of what pedestrian
signal indications mean. There is certainly a need to educate pedestrians
about the meaning of Walk, Flashing Don't Walk, and Steady Don't Walk.
As we discussed, we will send you an article that you can include in the
Mounds View Newsletter that you send to every City resident. The article
will mention the timing changes we will be implementing and evaluating
later this year. It will also discuss the meaning of the pedestrian
signals. We will send another article later that can be used in practices.
Spring newsletter reiterating proper pedestrian crossing
Additionally, we will try to make arrangements with the residents of the
elderly and handicapped housing facility at Long Lake Road to discuss the
pedestrian signal operation there so they understand the planned changes.
We would also appreciate you discussing pedestrian crossing safety with the
school district to determine the best way to educate students about proper
crossing practices. Due to the nature of T.N. 10 (e.g. high volumes and
high speeds), I hope parents also take an active role in their child's
safety by emphasizing safe crossing habits and restricting or supervising
crossings for younger children.
We will let you know when we have finished developing our new timing plans
and are ready to implement them. In the meantime, if you have any questions
about this situation, please contact me.
Sincerely,
Michael L. Robinson, P.E.
District Traffic Engineer
19
0
MEMO TO: Mayor and City
FROM: Clerk-Administr
DATE: January 31, 198
SUBJECT: NORTH STAR RACE TRACK (AKA MINNE•.SOTA MEADOWS)
SITE REVIEW
On January 23, 1984 the City received a copy of the Metropolitan
Council "Review" (copy attached) which stated that a review of
potential horse race track sites had been completed and that
the Council had referred the following issues back to the City
of Blaine for a response on the North Star Race Track.
1. Reexamination of the traffic impacts of the race track.
2. Clarify operational interactions between the proposed
track and the Anoka County -Blaine Airport.
3. Analyze the impact of surface water runoff.
As a result of this information, staff contacted the City of Blaine
to obtain information on the track and received a copy of the
"Metropolitan Council Racetrack Site Review" submitted to the
Metropolitan Council by organizers of the North Star Race Track.
A copy of the review is in the library for your review. Also
attached to this memorandum is a legislative update submitted to
Anoka County on the proposal in December, 1983.
The following is a summary of the proposal and its im[�7rtg as
described in the "Metropolitan Council Racetrack Site Review"
and staff's observations regarding this review.
The track is proposed for a 686 acre site located on the west side
of 35W between 95th Avenue and 109th Avenue. Access to the site
would be primarily provided by the 95th and Lexington interchanges
on 35W and 9th Avenue and the proposed 109th Avenue. (See attached
Location Map.)
Four Hundred Fifty -Three (453) acres of the site would accommodate
development of the track and related facilities and the remaining
232 acres would be used to accommodate the commercial development
which is felt would be attracted by the track. (See attached
Proposed On -Site Land Uses Illustration.)
Except for the relocation of the MUSA Line one-fourth mile to the
west, the report purports that there will be no negative impacts
upon any metropolitan systems and that, "No major facilities, such
as highway construction, sewer extensions, or impact on environ-
mental or natural resources will occur ..."
-z-
The analysis of possible impacts
on the MWCC and
transportation
systems would appear to be reasonable
in that no
significant
impacts are apparent. The same
would not seem to
be true as
it relates to the impact of the
proposed track on
the Anoka
County -Blaine Airport and, as a
result of airport
activities,
the City of Mounds View.
The evaluation of impacts from and on the airport (see attached
narrative and illustrations) discusses only two issues, namely,
that the operations of the airport would not interfere with
race track operations and visa versa. It should be noted that
the airport evaluation used current configurations and did not
discuss those called for by the Airport Master Plan. It would
seem logical to conclude that the construction of a race track
in such close proximity to the airport will result in increased
aircraft activity particularly if the airport is upqraded as
called for in the Master Plan.
With that in mind, staff would submit the following recommendation.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff would recommend that Council authorize the
preparation of a letter to the Metropolitan Council stating that
the City feels the potential impact of a race track on the Anoka
County -Blaine Airport is significantly downplayed in the site
review and encourage the Metropolitan Council to consider the
potential for increased aircraft operations. The letter should
14
also state the City's desire to be made aware of future submittals
and meetings on this matter.
I)FP%pf
Attachments
JtJ -1
300 Metro Square Bldg., St. Paul MN 55101 _
General Office Telephone (612) 291.6359 7�` o
on,
4` '� PAULEY 3
Ln
1 �REVIEW, �'�f�j 00't' N, IS ATI`117 D
9 E Mf11140
A Metropolitan Council Bulletin for Community Le 1. 5 ViFH
bl�{�
For more information on Items in this publication, ca, 2401 HdY 10
P MnUrtiS V104 Ms1 59112
January 13,1984
RECENT COUNCIL ACTIONS (Dec. 274an.13)
Racetracks —A Metropolitan Council review of potential
horseracing track sites has found no basis for rejecting any of
the proposed sites as far as regional plans are concerned. The
Council said the review does not commit the Council at this
time to any improvements or changes in regional sewers,
airports, parks or transportation facilities. The review was
sent to the Minnesota Racing Commission. Under star: lave,
the commission picks the site.
Lakeville has withdrawn its proposal, leaving seven cities in
contention for the track. An eighth proposal, from Hastings, is
expected within the next two months.
The Council also forwarded its comments on environmental
assessment worksheets prepared by Shakopee and Blaine con•
cerning proposed racetracks back to those cities. The Council
said the cities should analyze the impact of surface seater
runoff. The Gesture" I Asked the r'ti s rn envam'ne the
tr c@�I11 _ raffic impacts and Blaine was asked to clarify opera.
'onal interactions between Its propose track an t e —
Anoka CountyBlaine auoor .
as a Isposa — he Council said it would take whatever
legal action is necessary to obtain access to a candidate sludge
ash disposal site for testing in Carver County. Site property
owners in that county have consistently resisted Council
efforts to gain access to their land.
The en -site testing, which includes soil borings, is part of an
environmental impact statement the Council is preparing ar,
three candidate sludge ash landfill sites in Carver and Dakota
Counties. State law requires the Council to provide at least one
site for the disposal of sludge ash, which results from the
burning of sewage sludge at sewage treatment plants.
Transportation —The Council issued a request for proposals
to American and international companies to come forward
with proposals to build a self-supporting, fast, climate -
controlled transit connection between the Minneapolis and
St. Paul downtown skyway systems. Such a link would help
Integrate the two downtowns' 20 million square feet of
commercial, office dnd residential space. Proposals should be
submitted to the Council by March 30,1984.
Sewers —The Council said plans by the Metropolitan Waste
Control Commission to build a new East Minneapolis inter.
ceptor—a 10•footdiameter, six -mile long deep tunnel sewer —
are consistent with Council plans. The cost of the project is
estimated at S49 million, to be spent this year and next.
The new sewerwill provide additional capacity for north
suburban communities of Minneapolis and significantly reduce
the number of wet weather overflows of raw sewage into the
Mississippi River. The interceptor will run from near Marshall
Av. and Mississippi River Blvd. in St Paul to Marshall St. and
22nd Av. NE. in Minneapolis. It's the biggest and most
xpensive sewer interceptor the commission has ever built
older People —The Council adopted a clan for a service
delivery system for older people in Anoka County. The plan is
w auwuc ucvcluylllerlt Una Tunoing at services for
older people in the county. The Council has adopted similar
plans for Ramsey. Dakota and Hennepin Counties. The
Council decided to work on a plan for Scott County next,
Parks —The Council approved a boundary amendment
to Lake Byllesby Regional Park in Dakota County to include
a 67•acre parcel, acquired at a cost of S150,000. It also
approved a development grant increase of S200,000, for a
new total of S350,000, part of which is earmarked to repair
a dam in the park.
Tile Council approved a proposal by the Metropolitan
Parks and Open Space Commission to sponsor a design
contest to select a logo for regional parks and park reserves.
The contest and new logo are intended to increase public
awareness of regional parks.
PUBLIC HEARINGS, PUBLIC MEETINGS
Housing —The Council will hold a public meeting Feb.9 at
7 p.m. in the Council Chambers on proposed revisions to the
housing goals and policy issues of the housirg chapter of the
Metropolitan Development Guide. If you wish to speak at the
meeting, call Shirlee Smith at 291.6421. Written comments
will be accepted until Feb.17.
For a copy of the staff paper, Metropolitan Housing Policy
issues, pub. no.18.84.008, call the Communications Depart-
ment at 291.6464.
Juvenile Justice —The Minnesota State Planning Agency will
hold four meetings —in St. Paul, Jan. 24; Anoka, Jan. 26;
Minneapolis, Jan. 31: and in Burnsville Feb. 7—to prepare
model juvenile justice legislation for the 19115 State Legis•
lature. For details, call Kathy Bishop, staff attorney, Juvenile
Justice Code Revision Task Force, at 2964096.
NEW APPOINTMENTS
The Council named members to the following three bodies:
j.__ p I y o ., r,.k - rm: Roger Severer, Brooklyn Center,
chair; Tom Foley, St. Paul, vice chair; Richard Been., St. Louis Park;
sa
npUt gy1al Mountls View; Roger Brooks, St, Paul; Barbara Bird,
Crystal; David Fisher, Minneapolis; Marilyn Hamm, Blaine; Elizabeth
Kalish, White Bear Lake; Richard Kriar, Richfield; urban Langer,
Eagan; dwdit Lad, dlocmirgtcnr Jcck Nash, Wen St Paul: tkaal , William
Peterson, St. Paul: Paul Redrialh, Eden Prairie; WEs,yd,
M'enelap.mis: Fred Troutmonn, Hastings; David Woodrow, Edina; and
ardor osr. Blame.
rlmina us Ice Advisory Committee: Robert W. Johnson, Anoka,
reappointed chair; Lindley Arthur, Wayzata; Kim Bingham, St. Paul;
Eugene Borgida, Minneapolis: Beverly Boyd, Farmington; Barbara
Chester, Minneapolis: Nathaniel Davis, St. Paul; Susan Elfstroln,
Minneapolis; Leo Foley, Anoka; Pally Franke, Roseville; Michael
Geraghty, St. Paul; William Gillespie, Lino Lakos; Susan Gray,
Minneapolis; Ronald Harwood, St. Louis Park; Richard Herbst, Eagan;
Dennis Hughes, Scandie: Steve Johnson, Shakopee; Phillip Kress,
Shakopee; Kenneth Maas, Birchwood; Richard Mulcione, Shakopee;
Cathryn n, Crystal: Al Pufahl, Minneapolis:
St. Louis Paark: Charles Weaverl
Jr., Minneapolis: andCharles
Zacharias, St. Paul,
Long -Term Care Task Force: Tom Byrne, St. Paul, chair; Phil
Cohen, Brooklyn Center; Edward Dirkswager, Roseville; Iris Freeman,
Minneapolis; Pat Irvine, St. Paul; Gayle Kvenvold, Lakeville; Barbara
R's I
1 A �
t',• i. �, .' .
' ' t
Published by the NORTH STAR RACE TRACK ASSOCIATION a 1308 Com Rapids Blvd. • Coon Rapids. MN 55133 . 612•155-1150
Meet Your MINNESOTA MEADOWS Development Team
City Of Blaine . . , County of Anoka . . . The Center Companies
Johnson Bros, Corporation . . . Piper, Jaffray A Hopwood Incorporated
Peat, Marwick, Mitchell A Co. . , . North Star Race Track Association
Anoka County Blue Ribbon Racing Advisory Committee
A unique public/private partnership that will have the ability
to develop a Class "A" Premiere Marge Race Track for Minnesota.
THE CENTER COMPANIES
The Center Companies la a diver.
rifled national real rotate company
headquartered In 4inne,ata offering
a Wide range of devrlupwent.
manaq... a, +ad +
n solving e,W
in shopping centers, officebuild
I ngs and si hed-use project. a.
They provide a full range of
•ore ices far investors, fore,gn
and dumostie, Including acquisition.
financing, development, least."
and manaRrmrnt.
ANOKA COUHTT
Anoka County is recognized aI
one of the fastest growing and
most progressive countles in
the State of Minnesota. Unique
to Anoka County Is a couperattre
spirit which again prevails between
government and bueinesa to secure
A racing facility in the City
of Blaine.
Responding to numerous request.%
of local Chambers of Cummerce,
interested residents and organiza-
tions, the Anoka County Board
.f Cummissiuners adopted Resolution
ij-S. in support of the location
of A herae racing facility Within
• City of Blaine, Anoka County.
Anoka County Board of Cumia-
\ ners appointed An Anoka Cnunty
_Tfue Ribbon Racing Advisory Cum-
n,itre consisting of rrprosrntativry
.f government• businesses, and
„rher Interested groups to runrdio-
ate county efforts to nbt sin
this racing facility.
A TEAM THAT CAN'T BE NEAT!
CENTURT A-F., INC.
Century t-C, Inc, Is in irehiLeC-
tnre, mlg,necring and planning
firm, .per tallatnR in rune track
far, I 11.'e'. Dimitn Dennpulos,
srchitect Art le praetdent of
M1•ntury A-C, Inc., and t, re,slrun.
s,ble far the design and development
of ... race tracks throughout
the nazi on. One bf their projects,
the tauisian. Downs Race Track,
Which is located in Ra+Wier City.
I,•nt•,ana, von the Regional Archi-
t.rr. AIA Award far esrellence
in deign.
Gotiiry t-f, is currently working
"'h 'Bents an .... ral now race
I racks, including the rsisting
fa,rgrnunds in He. Orleans, which
.,11 be demolished and rebuilt.
Ci•nturr A-E in-hou.e architects
and .m; over+ are Capable of
producing the seen cea f.r all
phases of construction far the
r.,e bask industry.
CITY OF BLAINE
,lie City of Dlalue as 1.1. ateJ
!0 minutes from du.ntuwn.41nneapulis-
St. Paul. It i one of the tritest
g rowI ng C1Jml00FI11 tes Within the
metropolitan area. with a population
of 31..So.
The City Council of Blaine, by
reaolutinn, has eum.i tt oil its
'aplwwt to the development of
41nnesnta's first saj.r horse
.a, u,g 'tact ar the ore sr•I erred
.by Ilse Aort1, Stu, R.ark Tra,k
ivvviatiun in Blaine.
PIPER, JAFFRAT k HOPWOOD INC.
Piper, Jaffray L Hopwood Incorpo.
rated is a major regional full
service Investment banking firm
headquartered in Minneapolis,
wince__[_ tith ,rr
efft. and
630 registered -representatives
throughout the Upper Midwest
and Pacific 4orthwest. Piper
Jaffray trades and markets a
full range of corporate, government
sod - clpa! irrest:ant p,uJucts
to individuals and institutlunal
cl i,•ats. In Investment banking,
Piper Jdffray Is active. In raising
capital for corporate and govern-
mentJl clients through both public
and private offerings Including
an extensive role in venture
capital formation. The firm provides
detailed research investments
as ..It a. providing numerous
other financial services. Piper
Jdffray was founded in IB06 and
Is A u•nher of all adjur stuck
and commodity eachanRes.
HOLMES A GRAVEN
Haters A Graven is a law firm
of -- attorneys. spe c l a l i z i ng
m mine V'al financing, governmental
r.•present. ina. securities, real
,..rate development and syndication,
r,mdemni tian, labor. I tigatI on,
legislative lobbying and computer
law. As ,a nationally recognI zed
hund toansrd fir••• Holmes A Graven
h,m ..:zed as hond Counsel or
andeourlt,•r'a ,nuusr•I In tnnacetion
.,in bond is.oev in 41nnesuta.
Ywrrh Dakota. "nch O.LL,.r.a, .wlacnn-
.ia. 4.... . Ohio, Indiana,
and End h Cars! Ina.
CED/DOxGIIUE
CED/Donohue is one of the largest
arch I tectural -engineering firm -
in the upper mzdwest with majo6
offices in Minneapolis, Minnesota:
Chicago, Illinois; Sheboygan.
Wisconsin; and Waterloo. Iowa.
the group has a multidiseipllned
staff of over 600 professional.
technical and support personnel
providing services in all phases
of environmental research, engineer
Ing, planning and architecture.
It brings to this project a broad
range of experience in the develop.
sent of major transportat Ion
facilities, recreational facilic iex
and commercial/industrial parka.
The Minnesota firm has been directly
involved in the project area
since CID was founded in 1954.
CEO/Donohue is pre.tently providing
consulting dervlcas to local,
County and regional agencies
throughout the Twin Cities area
and provides exclusive consulting
services to the cities of Blaine
and Lexington,
ORR-SCIIELEX-MAYEROM A ASSOCIATES, INC
Orr-Srhelen-Mtyeran A Asaoc i at as,
Inc. IOSMI, a local consulting
engineering firm, will be Involved
with the utility, transportation,
and environmental engineering
necessary for the Race Track
in Blaine.
OSM has a long record of experience
in the design and implementation
of environmentally sound sanitary
sever facilities, later systems,
and .torm.ater management Systems,
the eumpany aisu of Fen transport-
ation related services Including
traffic nrigin-destination studies,
traffic projections, parking
etudleb, road layout, and existing
rradway audl ficar. Ions.
PEAT, MARWICK, MITCHELL A CO.
Peat, Marwick, Mitchell A Co.
IPebt Marviek) is a large inter.
natinnal rertifled public accounting
firm serving cummerclal. Industrial,
financial, service and governmental
clients. Peat Marwick hex over
90 offices in the United State..
Pear Marwick has aafsted gaming
urganiaatluns In ptanni:ig and
conducting financial fraelhility
.,ludic.. Prat Marwick hoe acted
an A financial consultant to
the Kurth Star Race Track A.wocia-
tlun.
ANOKA COUNTY BLUE RIBBON
RACING ADYISORY COMMITTEE
The Anoka County Blue Ribbon
Racing Advisory Committee vas
formed by Anoka County to promote
the development of Minnesota's
first horse race track In Anoka
County. The Anoka County Biun
Ribbon Racing Advisory Committee
supports the development of MINNE-
SOYA MEADOWS at the Blaine site.
JOHNSON BROS. CORPORATION
Johnson Bros. Corporation .as
furled and has been in business
Punt l nuuus I since 1029. Its
busy office la In Litchfield,
Mlnnysuta. The President and
Thud Operating Officer is Richard
W. Jahnwn.
Juhn.un Brns. Curpurvtlon is
engaged in the, construction of
induetraal plants and drwage
treatment facilities - including
the asseelated rumaereial asperts.
.hich.ays, bridges, bulk terminal%,
do... audiums Isimllar to thiv
penpo.ed project 1, and as let
etility .Y,teas.
WORTH STAR RACE TRACK ASSOCIATION
The North Star Race Track Associa.
tion is a nonprofit corporation
which .as organized with three
Purposes in Ind. First to promote
the development of a Class A
Horse Racing Track in Anoka County.
Second to find and "Ounce the
beat possible site which has
all the amenities necessary for
the development of a high quality
race track for the State of Minne-
sota. Third to assist a potential
developer in creating the best
herne racing track possible.
One of the facilities under construe.
tioncurrently by Johnson Bros.
internatlonal Is an equestrian
stadium and support facilities
including stables and horse arena
at Riyadh, Saudia Arabia. The
facility is part of the King
Abdulaziz Military Academy and
weatw approximately 16,000 people.
--MINNESOTA MEADOWS --
CLOSER TO REALITY
With barely a month before applica.
tion. for the Metro Class A Race
tracks are due the competition
Is really heating up. Although/ ■
it,
Impossible to say a
point t thL r
how many applicants there
will be, Lite one more thing is
that one of them will be from
Blaine (Minnesota Meadows).
Recently a presentation by the
Minnesota Meadows tea vas made
to the Anoka County legislative
delegation to bring them up to
date on the progress since the
•Racing Bill' was passed. The
seeting was extremniy well attended
it, local elected 'officials represent-
ing most of the units of government
of Anoka County and the delegation
adopted a resolution of support
for the Blaine site.
The Minnesota Meadows team consists
of developer The Center Companies
Ifurmerly Dayton Hudson Properties),
Johnson Bros. Construction, Piper
Jiffray and Ilnp.nud. A A E Archl-
tects and Engineers, Holmes A
Graven, Orr Schelvne Engineers,
CED Engineering. Peat Marwick,
and of courme, the City of Blaine
and Anoka Cnunty, the.. County's
Blue Ribbon !omission and the
North Star Race Track Association.
Seldom has a group with such
great eumpetenee andenthusiasm
been a,membled and the application
that will he presented to the
Mlnnenuta Racing Commission in
March -will prnvide for a well
financed. Innovative, secure,
and Attractive rea credit
tha)
will
Il he. a real adit Far th
whole state of Minnesota,
to addition to this outstanding
devrlopmrnt team the public support
from virtually every group and
urgaitatlon in the northern
nnmtle. has made the project
a t; eeendnoe pub!!c•r vat. effort.
A TEAM TIIAT CAN'T BE, (SEAT! --Charms Weaver. Consultant
NORTH STAR RACE TRACK ASSOCIATION
DERBY NIGHT - FEBRUARY 14, 1984
'A SWEETHEART RACE'
If you attended the flat Darby
Might you know what a great time
everyone had betting on the became
and bidding on the prizes during
EOIMESODI the auction at the and of the
MEADOWS evening. If you weren't there
you probably heard about It Eros
someone who was there and enjoyed
every minute.
Well, you've got the chance to
attend Darby Night 2. The Anoka
County Chamber is sponsoring
this event on Tuesday, February
It. 1984, from 7 to 11 p.m. at
the Bellies, Ballroom.
(continued - page 7)
�i
DERRY VIONT I - cunt tnurd . .
you'll be given chips to het
with, pre. Jew the y hot...our etsefore
each race, place
elien che.r on yowr choice as
you watch each rate --and there
are ten of them!At the end of
the ".,I,% use your winnings
to bid on a va ricty of items.
At the first Derby Might a sleeping
bug went for S61,000.00:
A guild chance to learn hew to
pick the winners! Fur an evening
of extra fun bring Your frien,ls
fur a preview of what it will
like when you attend mu• new
race track.
riekcl.w ar.. $15.00 per I ..........
and are ova ilab I,• Frus the .dn.k..
!anal) ,h,alirr of C,userl e- lid!
Caun Rapid, Boulevard. Cnun Rapids.
tar by cal line 755'Il.i0. nr at.
the ge1Rge Us l l room the night
of the avant.
THE SITE
Of the sites under consideration
by the Minnesota Racing Commission.
MINNES07A MEADOWS is unique,
in that It is the only site that
was originally promoted by the
local municipality and county
in which it lies.
MINNESOTA MEADOWS will be located
just 30 minutes north of downtown
Minnespolis/St. Paul, and 30
minutes From
an estimated the
1.7 :SSlicn _ ^I. residing- In
the Metropolitan area.
The site con..lsts of prime develop-
able flat land, with virtuaily
no on-,Lt. development. It ii
coned properly to accommodate
a horse racing facility, and
iw ennsistont with Blaine's Compre-
hensive Land Use Plan.
The site is strategically located
,in Interstate 35W between two
full diamond interchanges nt
q SLII and LesinOenn Ivenue.. lG
Is immediately adjacent to the
freeway with direct visual evpn,nre
to that major transpurtal iun
facility. This section of Interstate
35W Is currently uperating at
52% of design capacity during
peak ;traffic hours. Traffic projec-
tiuns ,has that the facility
and the existing street system
.:all accnmmodate the additional
traffic generated by the race
track without any major new highway
cnnwtruction.
It is nut anticipated that any
metropolitan systems will have
to be extended, or metropn litan
dollars expendnd, for the develop-
ment of the 014-inu lice as Ainne-
.uta'w first major horse. racing
facility.
11 i, hard to rnvlrlal a •itr
which has greaser potential for
the development of a major horse
rare track, and support facilitira,
within the mrtrupuiltan area
than lhr Blaine luratiun•
Minnesota Meadows
Aietro Locarlon
I
I Hennepin
i
Calvin -• 1,.r.w
I
1. it
I
J` I
Stott j
0
..IQ W Ywwt to Onitza
Onkols
1 _ �
I r- •.
I I
Wro LOCdl10f(
v
won
NORTH STAR
RACE TRACK ASSOCIATION
1308 Coon Rapids 61%d..202
®r:1
Coon Rapids, MN 55.13-1
,
'.
Air
FIRST CLASS
2/84
0
Proposed 109th Ave.
■■■ter■�...�.rt■�■�■la■�■o�■■
i
t
1 1 i
Race Track
1
it
Anoka -'Po. lal
:---
�; Akport . -
VOWN
Dwt.
MWO Im
Site'
r
686'Acres
40
Io
z _
-.\
a
c
0
ra
m—
QQ
Blaine Race Track i
Location Map
..""d b,
Steve OuMMtk
w9th Ave
Horseman ,
j( 8 V Park Houaing: L1>
�) 73.9 Acre �c
II Training ICommerewj'I0
�I........ Track Site , ��
I '10A0 ;;iel{ II �m
PaC�Cing I
••" for oov00 poop onc non0nu '."
1800 nn
... .... o Ll U
Parking Paddocks Pond p•
.:......:..:.
for 4000 Olu -House /
i
'•/ J
Track
Valet /.
mlf �,ar:kIrki PPrking
f6r 40M i}or 850 on /
zl�
I 75,9 '
Acre
"��nmmnrr.lAl
site a j
I
Proposed On Slte
Polling Land Uses
Conununity Development 0e0t.
July 19133
1
j
I I t HI IIIIII'tI111AN 'iYl 1IN; (0
h, A1111411115
An Ilhall rnl�"I �'" I�I�nb viignuryllljnrlilrl ullll�in�falt2lmil�t, influence
Ihr propllllyd I i�''
nl'ea nl' Ilu' Illil�n'-'l""��� Innnly dllpul'I•
nl rpol t tl,lnrtl l not ho u'Imp lvl ltl h1•Itl l upnnrd'II rnck11 o111.l,tf l'om lu ltlhrrlta
Hallo er I'llghi uprr,l lnlut nlundpulnl
2. ArcurdII'll lu "MI11111,' Infnrmnllun, II In gal mpacled that
Iln' r.ur Wilk lr I uiy .ullrili rrlulll,q lu the race.
wjL
Irurk, wiiul4 � '��� �i'ul'�I iir rl�'rlrnnlr Inlrl•frrenci• with the
nlrpurl �I eu, r,,l l �p��relinnn,
-37-
I'
(14;00)
I'
kI
u !
N
[rr
)�
L
d
500)
SI'1tIIN "
I.A KElk-
;.
I
PARKi "
d r,�CB
Im
ear �q9�i®
J.ry HdJ
U
n
INC
�s.
TO p 1511 SHOkF.' I
4 `
Minneapolis
R ci A
+�
Race Track Site -
Airport Location Map
0
1 '
r
/ Proposed IOpin An.
I,
-' Tees eo skJS
IN
:ra i ��1 Hal
sot\��. .. . • ...�*�A.�y ,�s
a
Noise Contours
Ldn 70 ` 1 Ldn 55 Contw oil Airport
:i rye
Ldn 65
Ldn d0 L
Fllpnl Pattern - Landing It
Ldn 55 rllpkt Patton - Tekc-Olf
'1. •7IC
Flight Path -
PIININI Noise Zones Map
con lr De.ebp.mnt Depl.
July 1933
tMI'lu %G
MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Clerk -Administrator
DATE: February 1, 1984
SUBJECT: PINECREST PROPERTIES
Attached to this memorandum please find correspondence received
by this office on January 31st from Mr. William H. Beim,
Managing Partner of Pinecrest Properties, requesting the following:
1. Rededication of Raymond Avenue.
2. The rezoning of four of the lots in the Pinecrest Addition to
light industrial.
3. The installation of sanitary sewer and paving of Raymond
Avenue by public improvement.
Also attached is a letter from Mr. Robert Balch, representing the
owners of Pinecrest Addition, which outlines the proposal for the
development of this area.
As I have previously indicated to you, City staff has had several
discussions with Mr. Balch regarding this development and encouraged
that any development of the Pinecrest Addition be coordinated with
the development of the properties owned by Mr. Waste and Mr. Herbst.
As you can see from the correspondence, although Mr. Balch is
indicating that they wish to coordinate the development of Pinecrest
Properties, they do not wish to wait for Messrs. Waste and Herbst
to file their plats and are requesting that they be allowed to move
forward with their development.
It is the thought of staff that before any action be taken on any
of the requests submitted by Mr. Beim, that the entire package be
forwarded to the Planning Commission for their review and recommenda-
tions with respect to the rededication of Raymond Avenue as proposed,
the rezoning of the four lots to light industrial, and the general
proposal as outlined in the drawing included with these letters.
It is also our thought that a letter should be sent to Mr. Beim
outlining the steps in the process that will occur and any further
action that might be required of him, such as, the formal filing
of a application for rezoning and payment of fees.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff would recommend that the Council submit the
Beim correspondence to the Planning Commission for their considera-
tion,with recommendations being returned to the Council on their
thoughts regarding the rededication of Raymond Avenue, the rezoning
of the four lots to light industrial, and the overall proposal.
-z-
Staff would further recommend that Council authorize the submittal
of a letter to Mr. Beim indicating your action on this matter and
requesting that lie submit a formal application for the rezoning of
the lots with payment of fees.
DPP/pf
Attachments
4
Beim Construction Company
0750 FRANCE AVENUE SOUTH
SUITE 129
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55425
Telephone; (612) 920.1558
January 30, 1984
Donald Pauley, City Administrator
City of Mounds View
2401 Highway 10
Mounds View, Mn. 55112
1 �
�C" �a
It
Subject: Rededication of Raymond Avenue, Pinecrest
Addition, per plat recorded August 14, 1969.
Dear Mr. Pauley:
It is the desire of Pinecrest Properties, owner of the
subject property, to have the City of Mounds view proceed
immediately to complete the legal work and properly re-
cord this rededication with Ramsey County. Could this be
approved and completed at the February 13th council
meeting?
The attached correspondence to you from our represent-
ative, R. M. Balch III, will detail our proposed plans for
this do,ielepment in 1984 and states why we feel there is
some urgency in get6ing this rededication done as soon as
possible.
Please feel free to call me at any time regarding
questions on this property.
Cordially,
Pinecrest Properties,
'2 �)1
W. H. Beim, Managing
Partner
Beim Construction Company
6750 FRANCE AVENUE SOUTH
SUITE 120
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55435
Telephone: (612) 920.1556
January 30, 1984
Donald Pauley, City Administrator
City of Mounds View
2401 Highway 10
Mpunds View, Mn. 55112
Subject: Petition to rezone portions of Pinecrest
Addition, City of Mounds View.
Dear Mr. Pauley:
Per the City of Mounds View procedures we petition to
have the following portions of Pinecrest Addition be
rezoned to light industrial:
Lot
1,
Block 1
Lot
3,
Block 1
Lot
1,
Block 2
Lot
2,
Block 2
Please advise me ot�R. M/ Balch III of anything we can
do to expedite this rezoning. We are, of course; more than
willing to meet at any time with city officials, commission
or council members to work out any problems or details.
possibly we can be on the agenda for the February 15th
Planning Commission meeting.
Cordially,
Pinecrest properties
W. H. Beim, Managing
Partner
k'01114
yy��y�riQliM . �o�Ms �f � TAeIl �
I 1 i
I
GVAStB 1✓QuJfLIA_
i •v t.
...,�... �.yt
I ,
4
f ,
LONM�f,SL�A •'O
L/6M1 A11WIMIA4
4s'0
,t4—,s-Jr
r 't
��iNLGRasr PAfK - ----
JaNWAXY. l''.
Beim Construction Company
6750 FRANCE AVENUE SOUTH
SUITE 12]
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55405
Telephone:(S12) 920.1558
January 30, 1084
Donald Pauley, City Administrator
City of Mounds View
2401 Highway 10
Mounds View, Mn. 55112
sewer
n Raymond
Subject: Avenue and totition to npave lRaymond �Avenie.
Dear Mr. Pauley:
According to City of Mounds View procedures we are
petitioning the city to have a sanitary sewer installed
in Raymond Avenue and to pave Raymond
We would like to have this done as soon as possible
after rezoning is completed.
Cordially,
Pinecrest Properties
i
W. H. BCim, Managing
Partner
January 31, 1984
Mr. Donald Pauley, City Administrator
CITY OF h1OUNDSVIFW
2401 Highway 10
Moundsview, t•1N 55112
RE: Development Plan for the Pinecrest Addition
commonly known ''s, Pinecrest Park
Dear Mr. Pauley:
V "A
I
r r 1
t.♦
-•
As you know, I have been engaged by the owners of Pinecrest Park to help
them develop it properly. During the past two months I have attempted to
familiarize myself with this immediate area and figure out how to develop
Pinecrest Park to the highest economic use and also not offend any neighbors.
You and your staff have been more than gracious in furnishing mg background
information; spending a lot of time meeting with me and answering my
questions. Also, you have clearly set forth the standards of development
that the ry ;rof Mnundsview will insist on.
--„
The following summ;ury sets forth what has been done and what our 1984 plans
are:
1. We have engaged S.E.N. to do our engineering.
2. Recognizing that a median cut intersection is a necessity to handle
eventual traffic, we met on January 19 with the MnDOT District
Office to present our case. Attending this meeting were you, S.E.H.
representative Glen VanWormer, Bob Waste and myself. Our engineering
representative, Glen VanWormer, Traffic Engineer, felt that the DOT
response was favorable and is proceeding with engineering studies
for MnDOT. This is a joint effort of Pinecrest Park, Bob Waste and
Irving Herbst.
3, The fact that it will take some time to complete an agreement with
trinDOT and have the intersection built, together with a very favorable
economic climate, convinces us that we should immediately proceed
with the development. Today, we have people interested in building
a commercial complex on the commercial portion and people interested
in a large office/districting center, a home office and a distri—
bution center.
Mr. Donald Paulcy
January 31, 1984
Page 2
To accusnudate these Pruspceto, we wrud, to proceed immediately with
what we call "Phase V.
Phase I contains:
a, Complete dedication of Raymond Avenue. Dead end the north
end and put in a cul-de-sac as shown on the attached sketch.
b. Rezone to light industrial the portions of the plat as shown
on the sketch. We feel that our pricing schedule, plus the
City of Moundsview's permit procedures will ensure a high
quality of construction that will guarantee a pleasant atmos-
phere for adjoining property owners.
c. As water is already in Raymond Avenue, we would want a sewer
system and paving of Raymond Avenue this spring. We would
also immediately have an architecturally designed berm, foliage
and tree system installed on the north edge of the property
to maintain a pleasant, natural view for these neighbors.
4. Phase II
a. As the median cut on Highway 10 will be on the northwest �)
property line adjoining the Waste Property, we recognize that h
we and Mr. Waste would have to dedicate land for a north/
south street. We agree to do this, assuming the cooperation
of Mr. Waste.
This north/south street leading from the new median cut
would become the main street into the park. As shown on
the sketch, another street would immediately be needed along
the top of the commercial block connecting the two north/
south streets. We agree to dedicate land in the future for
this cross street.
5, Phase III - At the present time we do not wish to propose any further
subdivision of the lots or anymore streets. There are several
reasons for this:
a. It cannot be considered until the median cut is a reality.
b. We have at least two qualified prospects, both of which would
purchase an entire lot and develop it themselves, possibly
with private streets.
c. Depending on a. and b., there are many satisfactory alter-
natives for street systems.
J
Mr. Donald Pauley
January 31, 1984
i Page 3
CONCLUSIONS:
The ultimate success of this development depending to a large extent on
our securing a median cut on Highway 10 from MnCOT. We have the full coopera-
tion of adjoining ProPcrty owners, Robert Waste and Ivring Herbst. We
appreciate the 100% coopci"ition of the .^•tarr of the City of Moundsviev in
approaching MnDOT-
With the present economic climate plus the expansion we see occuring on
Highway 35W between Roseville and Blaine, we feel the time has come to
develop this land for the benefit of all.
Rest assured that we will proceed, with your cooperation, to develop
Pinecrest Park in a manner that we will be proud to be associated with and
it will be an asset to the City of Moundsview.
Cordially yours,
rY/ f 2�;/.iZ
Robert M. Balch, III
RMB:d
cc: Wm. Beim
CO. RD. /d 2
WASrE i ; G/cNr -rAJ,O( r,'JAI rNA_ ujMlAA
' 0
'`pa� �,J� LJLNY .LNO!/SYR/AL
Loi•w.
p 64,36r
I -]
A IVaA 9 / ,19P4
4tL, /r
MEMO TO: nITY COUNCI
r FROM: MAYOR Il
DATE: JANUARY 23, 1984
SUiJ: INFRASTRUCTURE CAPACITIES
Recent discussion in connection with a reduction in residential lot
front footage only touched on the larger question of the consequences
for our municipal infrastructure of ultimate development. While
future development to the extent realized in parts of Minneapolis and
St. Paul may be unlikely, still we need to anticipate the possibility
of densities beyond what is currently envisioned in the Comprehensive
Plan or allowed in our present ordinances (since these have been, and
no doubt will continue to be,subject to change). Accepting the possi-
bility that the infrastructure could be overburdened (whether from
current projections of growth or from worst case projections), the key
issue here is whether or not we are to attempt to limit growth to the
capacity of the infrastructure, or make a conscious decision now to go
beyond such existing capacity, and to begin to provide the means to do
so. A choice of this magnitude demands a solid basis. Accordingly, I
propose that Staff take the following initial steps:
1. Pull together available information from the Comprehensive Plan,
Analysis of The City of Mounds View Water System, the Draft of the
Storm Water Management Plan, etc., to provide the Council with a
"broad brush" picture of existing capacity (deficient, adequate, or
excess) and projected capacity under "full" development aoeordlag
to the Comprehensive Plan. These capacities should be broken down
by district, as appropriet.e
,
2. Ascertain the minimum front footage and area requirements of
various types of development in Minneapolis and St. Paul,
3. Analysis of what would be required to be able to extend the
projections for capacities to the worst case possibility of
central city development density.
MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Clork-Administrator
DATE: February 2, 1984
SUBJECT: MAYOR'S MEMORANDUM REGARDING INFRASTRUCTURE CAPACITIES
Pursuant to discussion at the January 23rd Council Meeting, the
referenced memorandum from Mayor McCarty regarding infrastructure
capacities has been placed on the February 6th agenda for discussion.
The purpose of this memorandum is to outline staff's observations
regarding the Mayor's proposal and means for integrating it into
the City's 1984 Program.
Staff would agree that the City Council needs to have at its disposal
all the information necessary to make knowledgeable decisions on
proposals for development of the undeveloped areas of the City and
"redevelopment", i.e. lot splits, rezoning, expanded use of existing
buildings, etc. of developed areas. An important piece of that
information is a full understanding of the existing condition and
capacity of our infrastructure as well as what type of improvements
might be necessary to meet specific development demands.
In reviewing the Mayor's proposal and the 1984 Goals established
during a work session in September 1983, it would seem that the
proposed review of infrastructure capacities could best be
accomplished and provide for the most thorough review when integrated
into Priorities 3, 4, and 5 of the 1984 Goals, namely, Onqoinq
Infrastructure Maintenance Program, Development of a Long -Term
Trend Analysis,and Update of Land Use Regulations. This would allow
for rho royi,ow of nrovinim studies to determine the validity of
their data and conclusions based on the current condition of infra-
structure systems, current development, past and future development
trends having an impact upon infrastructure and most importantly,
ensure the integration of this information and conclusions when the
update of land use regulations is being considered.
Therefore, staff would recommend that the Council direct that the
Mayor's proposal be integrated into the 1984 Goals Program as outlined
above to ensure that the evaluation of infrastructure capacities as
proposed by the Mayor is included in the comprehensive program
established by the Council by the 1984 Goals.
DFP/pf
Attachments
MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council
Department !leads
FROM: Clerk-Administrato 4
DATE: September 16, 198
SUBJECT: 1984 GOAL SETTING SESSION
The purpose of this memorandum is to summarize the results of the
1984 Goal Setting Session conducted on the evening of September 15th
The results of this Goal Setting Session were as follows:
Priority Goal Statement
Goal Implementation Plan
Clear Staff/Council Communications
Ongoing Infrastructure Maintenance Program
a) Water & Sewer
b) Storm Sewer
c) Streets
d) Buildings
Develop Long -Term Trend Analysis
Land Use Management
a) Protect Open Space
b) Protect Wetlands
c) Update Land Use Regulations
6
Define Service Level Priorities
a) Manpower Needs Analysis
- Engineering
b) Consulting Costs
- Legal
7
Financial Plan
a) Revenue Management Plan
b) Capital (Equipment) Development Program
c) Fixed Asset Study
d) Consulting Costs
- Legal
8
Strategy to Implement Park Master Plan
9
Park & Recreation Programs
10
Intergovernmental Cooperation
11
Monitor Airport Development Impact
After the budget is adopted it is my desire that the Council meet
with department heads to discuss these goals, particularly the first
two, in order that we might begin the process of implementing these
goals prior to or immediately after the first of the year. This
discussion would also be helpful in that staff will be preparing a
Proposed Long -Term Financial Plan for 1984 right after the budget is
adopted and these goal statements should be included in that Plan
with appropriate narrative comments.
MEMO TO: Mounds View City Council
FROM: Bruce K. Anderson, Director
Parks, Recreation and Forestry
DATE: February 2, 1984
RF: City Newsletter
As you are aware, the City has not yet formally entered into a
contract with a local printing firm for the printing of the 1984
City Newsletter. We had indicated to Mounds View Printing that
we would allow them to print the January -February Newsletter on a
trial basis and should they meet our standards and timeline, we
would consider entering into a year contract.
It would be staff's recommendation, based on the quality of work,
and the timeliness in which Mounds View Printing handled the in-
itial newsletter, that the contract be awarded to their firm on a
full-time basis. The Mounds View Printing was approximately
$2,000 below the second bidder from a cost perspective, but more
importantly, we feel they delivered a very timely and quality
product. In addition, staff feels that it's beneficial to work
with local businesses and we have encouraged this in the past and
will continue to do so in the future.
I would ask that you review the January -February City Newsletter
tO rani rid 'y'C JrCC if of th? q�!aliMy which 1 feel Speaks fnr itself. -
RECOMMENDATION: To enter into an agreement with Mounds View
Printing for the printing of the five (5) City Newsletters re-
maining in 1984 at the firm's low bid price of $1,437.00 per is-
sue.
BKA/sll
V
&,w 1.3
MEMO TO; Mounds view City Council
FROM: Bruce K. Anderson, Director
Parks, Recreation and Forestry
DATE: February 21 1984
RE: Groveland Park Foundation
As you are aware, the Groveland Park Foundation has once again
year of operation
assumed a leadership role in supervising the winter skating pro-
gram at Groveland Park. This is the secondoand they have done a
that the program has been in axistan and maintaining the ice
remarkable job of both supervising of the year -
surfaces at Groveland Park. I have attached a copy
om 1982-83 which outlines how the dollars were
end staff memo fr
expended that were credited to Torrthatawereacompletedc range
noted, there were a number of p jects
ing from planters to purchase of tables and other related items
for Groveland Park.
It appears that there will be approximately S1,500 - $1,600 to be
credited to Groveland Park once again for the 1983-84 from
g
ulties
season. There were a number
mEtolthecGrovelandaParksFoundation
our system of crediting monies
without actually giving them a direct check for their services.
mend that a final total of hours aand omonies
that
Staff would recom
to
were saved in supervision costs he directly that they would
Groveland Park. The Foundation feels strongly
like to control the fund and have
ventssured staff they they would
all be utilized for park imp
There is no immediate need for a decision on this issue, but the
Foundation has requested that the Council review their position
the winter skating season.
on this prior to the completion of
Staff will he on hand at Monday evenings council meeting to dis-
cuss this issue in greater length. Should there be any questions
regarding the attached memorandum or staffs position on this is-
sue, feel free to contact myself directly at ext. #41.
BKA/sll
Attachment
MEMO TO: Groveland Park foundation
ector
FROM: Parks,ruce KRecreation land rForestry
/" \ DATE: February 1, 1984
cost Update on City F.xpt:nditures for Grove land Par
RE:
As you are aware, the City of Mounds View has set aside, $1,100
the 1982-83 winter skating program. This
for the Groveland Park Foundatinn for supervisory services t a
provided during per hour for approxi-
were p the 82-83
figure was based on an hourly rate of S3ce rovided during
mately 315 hours of voluntaWYassthe1City Council
's desire tleted
winter skating season• It or ark improvements to be comp
for a number of projects and/ providing a check for the total
at Groveland Park in lieu of P
amount.
To provide you with a better accounting of
the
red eh the follow -
been been credited to the $1,100 to date, I Prepa
ing list of projects:
............5 265.00
1, sign construction .......••......
This was based on $125 for the routed sign and
$140 worth of timber to contruct the sign. $ 206 00
2. Two grills ......................................
This was based on the purchase of two grills that
eofnS42a00 an individual cost
were installed at Gr
of $82.00 plus freight
S la.n0
3. Geranium plants .........................
...
36 geranium plants were purchased at a cost of 50�
per plant and placed below the Groveland Park sign.
4. Two tables ..............................
• ••,,,,,,.$ 190.00
Two utility tables were purchased and placed at the
Groveland Park shelter building to be used for a
variety of purposes.
,,,,,....5 275.00
5, Bench and planter lumber ..................
This was for the cost of materials
located adjacenttto the
lanJscapc benrplanter
hes and
volleyball court. $ 75.00
6• Miscellaneous expenditures
t-up costs ed
th pap
These were star rubber stamps, and some l someinitialrs of
incorporation, stationary expenses.
7
8.
-2-
warming house benches ..............................S 225.00
This was for materials to construct three benches
to be located in the Groveland Park warning house at
a cost of $75 per bench.
Planting materials .................................$ 184.60
This is for purchasing 33 trees and shrubs to he
located around the Groveland Park shelter building.
TOTAL EXPENDITURES ...................S1,438.60
I
11
PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MOUNDS VIE14
RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA
�7n- . Regular Meeting
r January 23, 1984
LJ
6�.Mounds View City Hall
2401 Hwy. 10, Mounds View, MN 55112
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The Mounds View City Council was called to order by 1. Call to Order
Mayor McCarty at 7:30 PM on January 23, 1984.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Councilmembers Linke, Hankner,
anc$I Eara, Doty and Mayor McCarty.
ALSO PRESENT: City Attorney Meyers and Clerk/
A inm�'nistrator Pauley.
Motion/Second: Doty/Linke to approve the January
T—I964 minutes as presented.
5 ayes 0 nays
Frank Gabrysh, 2832 County Road J, asked if any-
thing different was being done to the water, as his
smelled of chlorine and was very foul. Clerk/
Administrator Pauley replied that a new chlorine
tank was started, and it can sometimes take awhile
for it to distribute evenly.
Mayor McCarty asked that someone from the water
department go over and obtain a sample.
Motion/Second: Doty/Blanchard to approve the con-
sent agenda, as presented, and waive the reading of
the resolutions.
5 ayes 0 nays
2. Roll Call
3. Approval of
Minutes:
January 9, 1984
Motion Carried
4. Residents Re-
quests and
Comments from
the Floor
5. Approval of
Consent Agenda
Motion Carried
Motion/Second: Linke/Blanchard to have the first 6. 1st Reading of
re�inp 6zdinance No. 355, nmendina tha Mimi(.innl nrd_ me. 355
Code of Mounds View by amending Chapter 40 entitled,
"Zoning", and waive the reading.
5 ayes 0 nays
Motion Carried
Mounds View City Council q ,`) ? ;. i January 23, 1984 ---
Regular- Meeting
.ii di _----------- -1 Page Two
--------------------
gwaf
Councilmember Doty stated that, under Section 7. 1st Readin
27.05, Amendment or Repeal, he would like to have Ord. No.
the money go back into the bond redemption fund,
rather than the general fund, unless there is a
specific purpose to go for in the general fund.
Mayor McCarty questioned if the fund is not
eliminated, with the improvement bonds that are
being defeased. Attorney Meyers replied that a
new fund is established to pay off the bonds, and
the way the ordinance is written, if it was
repealed, they would be putting the money back into
the bond fund. He recommended the language be
changed to read "shall be deposited in such fund
as the City Council directs".
Clerk/Administrator Pauley advised that Staff
proposed the general fund, as some of the money
came from the 5% that was levied on the taxes,
and the general fund is supported by the taxes.
Councilmember Hankner pointed out the present
Council has set up the concept in the ordinance,
and she feels the money should go back into the
general fund. She added that a 4/5 vote would
be required for future Council's to change the
ordinance.
There was considerable discussion among the
Council :ith it heinq a�read to eo ahead with
the first reading, and discuss further at the
next agenda session, before the second reading.
Motion/Second: McCarty/Hankner to approve the
first rea ing of Ordinance No. 356, establishing
Chapter 27 of the Municipal Code entitled,
"Special Projects Fund", and waive the reading.
4 ayes 1 nay Motion Carried
Councilmember Doty voted against the motion.
Mayor McCarty closed the regular meeting and opened 8. Public Rezone HeariCnty
the public hearing at 7:50 PM.Road I from 1-1
There were no comments from the audience. Mayor to B-3
McCarty closed the public hearing and reopened the
regular meeting at 7:50 PM.
Motion/Second; Doty/Linke to have the first reading 9. 1st Readin�
o r nance o. 354, amending the Municipal Code of Ord. No. 3
Mounds View by amending Chapter 41 entitled "Specific
Rezonings", and waive the reading.
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
p January 23, 1984
Mounds View City Council Page Thxee
Regular Meeting a VS a u "' 6-------------
Motion_ /5=cond: Linke/Rankner to approve Resolu- 10. Approve Rslt.
11No. 1704
tion No. 1704, approving the minor subdivision for
the reading.
the Burger King Corporation, and waive
Motion Carried
5 ayes 0 nays
Motion/Second: Blanchard/Doty to approve Resolu-
11, Approve Rs1t. No, 1705
tion No. 70 , approving a conditional use permit
King Corporation for a convenience
for the Burger
food establishment, and waive the reading.
Motion Carried
5 ayes 0 nays
Motioncond: liankner/Blanchard to approve
to
12. Approve Rslt.
No. 1703
Resolution No. 1703, approving an amendment
he Silver Lake
the or
planned use
y aivethetreading
Motion Carried
5 ayes 0 nays
Motion/Second: Hankner/Linke to approve Reso-
Clerk/Admini-
13. Approve Rslt.
No. 1707
1utio�07, authorizing the
strator and Mayor to execute Development oration,
84-64 with Burger King p
Agreement No.
and waive the reading.
Motion Carried
5 ayes 0 nays
Motion/Second: Doty/Linke to approve Resolution
14. Approve Rslt.
No. 1709
rescinding Resolution No. 1425 and
liabilities of Lhe
transferring all assets and
special capital projects fund to the Silver Lake
fund, and
Woods improvement project construction
waive the reading.
Motion Carried
5 ayes 0 nays
Pauley reported Mrs. Gale and
15. Consideration o
Feasibility
Clerk/Administrator be
Ms. Yost had been advised the Counci
alsoReport
for Pub -
discussing their item this evening, andhe
Gale had indicated that nothing
lic Improvement
Fairchild
reported that Mrs.
done in the past two months to determine
on
Avenue Northerl
had been
the marketability of the property, and that she
the ity.
of Laport Drive
1thatoMrs.fGaleasibe hastindicatedfshe wouldrom
was
Headded
like more time.
Ken Sjodin stated he was representing Mrs. Gale,
that they believe
and they now have a modification
valuable
Will make the lots more
theand
to improvementsaand
they would like Proceed
Mounds View CityCouncil I t�' " 'i �Januar 23 1984
Regular Meeting i �' V - . d t 'i r y L) Page Four
------------------------------------------------------------------------
subdivision. He presented the Council with a copy '
of their new proposed plan.
Councilmember Hankner expressed concern regard-
ing the time element, as the nuisance problem still
exists, and deadlines had been set before,
Mr. Sjodin stated that if the concept is approved,
it can be drawn up properly and back to the City
within one week.
Mayor McCarty stated that while he was concerned
with the time element also, he felt the Council
should stay within their realm of responsibility,
and the plan should go back to the Planning
Commission for their review.
Motion/Second: McCarty/Doty to table any further
action on the Fairchild Avenue vacation until the
first regular Council meeting in March.
5 ayes 0 nays
Motion Carried
Councilmember Linke reminded the Council that they
had promised the residents that action would be
taken this evening, and he pointed out how very -�
last minute the sketch was that was just presented.
Councilmember Hankner stated she did not feel the
Council has established that the improvements are
going to go in, and she expressed ronrorn ehnnt
the time element, as Mrs. Gmle and Ms. Yost have
had a year and a half to get a plan together,
and the neighbors are concerned with the time lag.
Mr. Bremmer asked the Council what was to prevent
the issue from going on and on. He reminded them
they have been working toward a resolution for 18
months, and that last October they were told a
decision would be reached by the Council in
January, and now the Council has extended that
deadline another two months, to March.
Mayor McCarty explained they could order the
vacation tonight or table further action until
March to give the applicants ample opportunity
to follow through, and that if they have not
proceeded by March, the Council can go forward
at that time with the vacation.
Mr. Bremmer stated he would like some definite '
pre -established parameters set up, as the deadline
keeps being moved out. Mayor McCarty replied
that if nothing happens in March, the Council
will definitely remove the item from the table
and take some action.
January 23, 1984
Mounds View City Council 1, ? r' Page Five
Regular Meeting
--------------k- hh L• 'r ; i I/ 1'._, -----g
--------------- ------------------------------ ---
^ Park Director Anderson reported the year end forest- 16
ry report had been submitted, and the joint powers
agreement program with New Brighton is working very
well; this is the first year more trees have been
put in than taken out; he advised the Council of
the potential for a gypsy moth problem; the com-
posting program was very successful, and he reviewed
the statistics, with Ramsey County wanting to open
the site again in the Spring, however, Mounds View
does not have the capability to be open twice a year.
Park Director Anderson reported the new dump truck
is up and running, and the tractor has been ordered
and should arrive later this week. Park maintenance
was the best its been in the past five years, with a
full time evening crew for flooding the rinks, and
skating conditions have been excellent. Senior
citizens have been involved in the warming house
program, and it has worked out well. The City has
also had luck with having the shelter buildings open.
The City has received preliminary funding for a 35%
F,rant for a jogging trail at Silver Lake Park, and
he will be talking to Burger King to see if they
are willing to assist.
The guidelines have been established for the park
planning fund, with a $2,000 check being received
from Honeywell. The Groveland Park association
has raised over $6,000 and completed many projects,
and he reviewed their newsletter.
Park Director Anderson reviewed the heai*_hy lifestyle
wellness program, which is just getting off the ground.
a.,;�oA r ar.. three new leagues were started this
�,r ate._ h. g 01_ __ L,,,.1,,,,,
past year, adult ice hockey, 4 man adult L.LUU1. „�111.,,
and 4 man team boot hockey for youths. The Edgewood
Community Pool was also painted over the Christmas
holiday break.
Finance Director Brager reported the far budgetthe wasit
adopted, and they are gearing up
year end financial reports. The department has been
very active with the computer, and the utility bills
are now computerized, and they are working on the
micro computer/word processor to allow doing entry
from City Hall. There is a problem in getting a
numeric key pad, as it was recalled and redesigned,
and they hope to have one soon.
Director Brager reported the financial statements will
be available for the Council as soon as the interest
'fiures are Hegavailable
also advisedtheCitydstayed within the te County tsnow er aremprocess.
oval
budget for 1983.
The City has hired an insurance consultant, and will be
4th Quarter
1983 Department
Head Reports
Mounds View City Council G,yi January 23,
1984 '
Regular Meeting
�; Page Six
----= --'-``-�--------------------------------i ... .. A -------------------
looking at equipment and buildings the City owns, for
insurance appraisal,
,
The City is looking for another part-time person,
under the MFE D program, for the finance department.
The Finance Department Staff is gathering information
on a flexible benefits plan, and will be presenting
the information to the Council later.
Police Chief Ramacher reviewed the many changes that
have taken place in the Police Department in the past
few months. He reported Officer Brick had met with
the Jaycees and discussed the changes in the DWI laws,
and informed them of current arrest procedures. Officer
Chambers received a letter of commendation from
New Brighton for stopping a stolen vehicle and arresting
the suspect.
The Jaycees again held their haunted house in the Police
garage, with over 2,000 attending. The part time secretary
was out on maternity leave, with the CSO filling in for
her. The Lion's Club donated $300 for police cameras.
In December, they held a department meeting and reviewed
the current rules and regulations and upcoming changes
and established new policies. Chief Ramacher reported
D
he has since met with everyone individually, for their
comments and suggestions.
Chief Ramacher reviewed the training sessions attended
by the Police Department personnel. He also advised
that 101 applications were received for the patrolman
vacancy.
The 1983 yearly report will be delayed, as the State
is having budget problems and has been delayed in
getting out the computer print-outs. Class I crimes
declined 13% in 1983, and Class II crimes declined
9%. He also advised that in 1982, Mounds View Policc
arrested more people for drunk driving that any other
department in Ramsey County, including the Sheriff's
department.
The Block Watch program has not made much progress, and
Chief Ramacher recommended putting a notice into the
newsletter, to get the information out to the residents.
Park Director Anderson reminded the Council of the
February 3 deadline for the next newsletter.
Mayor McCarty informed the Council of a call he had
received from someone ticketed for being a snowbird,
who was not aware the City had such a policy. He
suggested having each department head have an article
in each newsletter, relevent to his department.
January 23, 1984
Mounds View CityCouncil ` `^�- Y
Regular Meeting 6� .':1� Page Seven
--------------------- Jc_ :-----=-'-=---------- ---------------
,--. Clerk/Administrator Pauley advised that an article
had already appeared in the newsletter regarding
the snowbird policy, as well as a separate one regard-
ing the snowmobile policy, and they are published
each year.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported the Public Works
department had drained, cleaned and inspected the
ground resevoir, removed snow from around the hydrants,
and had two water main breaks, which were handled in
house,
He reported 85% of the time of the street and sewer
department was spent in snow removal, with a sewer
break repair being done on Woodcrest.
Two new pieces of equipment came into the shop, and
one piece of used equipment was sold. LP conversions
are being done on the new vehicles after 500 miles.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reviewed the Community
Development department, with permits being issued
for 20 new single family homes, 3 duplexes, a 70 unit
motel, a 10 unit apartment, 5 condominiums and
Mr. Donut, with 243 building permits total being
issued. He reviewed the inspections and reinspections
done for the year. There were 6 minor subdivisions
and 7 major, with 23 planning applications being
processed. Revenues are greatly exceeding the
projections for 1983.
The inventory in the Public Works department is just
getting started, as there were some problems in
getting set up.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reviewed the status of
the Public Works projects that are in process, and
advised that Staff is handling them.
Motion/Second: Blanchard/Doty to have the second 17. 2nd Reading and
reading adoption of Ordinance No. 353, amending Adoption of Ord
the Municipal Code of Mounds View by amending No. 353
Chapter 41 entitled "Specific Rezonings", and
waive the reading.
Councilmember Linke - aye
Councilmember Hankner - aye
Councilmember Blahchard - aye
Councilmember Doty - aye
Mayor McCarty - aye Motion Carried
U M mMounds View Cit Council l'.f,."�•��"y� y�,%�A' January 23, 1984
Regular Meeting y �!�$a u t :> J
g g Page Eight
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attorney Meyers reported that, as of .January 1, 1984, 18. Report of
the City is responsible for prosecuting all gross Attorney
misdemenor offenses, which were previously handled 10
by the County Attorney's office. He also reported
that the consolidation of courts is still being
pursued, and updated the Council on the status of
those discussions.
Attorney Meyers reviewed some of the discussion
that occurred at a recent conference he attended
of the Municipal Attorney's Association, regarding
Citys getting into the finance business.
Councilmember Linke reported he had attended the 19. Reports of
Ramsey County League meeting, on January 18, Councilmembers
where they had discussed the Ramsey County court
consolidation.
Councilmember Hankner had no report.
Councilmember Blanchard had no report.
Councilmember Doty reviewed an article he had
read regarding Group W and their efforts to get
their contract amended.
Is
Mayor McCarty reported there is one applicant for
two commissions, and that after speaking to the
chairman of the Festivities Commission, they do not
feel there would be a problem in the same person
serving on both commissions.
Motion/Second: McCarty/Doty to appoint Jan Lindberg
to the Lakeside Park Commission for 3 years.
5 ayes 0 nays
Motion Carried
Motion/Second: McCarty/Blanchard to appoint Jan
Lindberg to the Festivities Commission for 3 years.
5 ayes 0 nays
Motion Carried
Mayor McCarty reported there are four applicants for
the Energy Commission, with seven being needed.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley advised there is a draft
resolution for the Commission, and he will place
the item on the next agenda for discussion.
Motion/Second: McCarty/Linke to appoint Jerry
B anc�T »�d—t—ofill the two year vacancy on the Police
Civil Service Commission.
4 ayes 0 nays 1 abstention
Motion Carried
Councilmember Blanchard abstained from the vote.
January 23, 1984
Mounds View City Council "tit
D
Regular Meeting Yd iu G�•.: 'w L Page Nine
-----------------------------------------------
Mayor McCarty reported the Planning Commission is
recommending the Council appoint all three applicants
to the Planning Commission, and expand the Planning
Commission to 9 members once again.
Councilmember Blanchard stated she was opposed to
expanding the Commission to 9 members, based on her
own experience of being on the Commission when they
had 9 members, and having trouble getting enough
together for a quorum, and that it was very difficult
to work with that many people.
Councilmember Linke stated he agreed with Councilmember
Blanchard's feelings.
Councilmember Doty stated he agreed with Councilmember
Blanchard also.
Councilmember Hankner pointed out that the request
to expand to 9 members was coming from the Planning
Commission itself, and perhaps they felt there was a
commitment from the members.
Mayor McCarty stated he could remember the problems
of having so many on the Planning Commission, but asked
that Staff contact Peg Mountin and convey the Council's
thoughts and questions, for the Planning Commission's
response.
Motion/Second: McCarty/Doty that it be the stated
..�:o-•- and/or ordinances be
policy that aii iebviuuiv•� ••
placed first in line on the agenda, as far as
practical.
5 ayes 0 nays
Clerk/Administrator Pauley explained the criteria
used in setting the agenda.
Motion carried
CLerk/Administrator Pauley advised the Council of 20. Administrator
of
an article in the Met Council Newsletter, regarding
the racetrack and interaction between the racetrack
and airport. He stated Staff will be obtaining
whatever written reports are available,
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported he would have
Staff contact the Highway Department regarding the
status of Highway 10.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley advised the Council
:hat they are working toward hiring an energy
coordinator, in conjunction with Blaine, and he
will keep them advised of the status.
v.
Mounds View City Council ;'gp C � W;; � January 23, 1984
Regular Meeting Page Ten
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Clerk/Administrator Pauley advised that the mailer,
advertising for a consultant regarding the Anoka
County Airport Master Plan, will be going out
nationally on January 24, giving 30 days for
proposals to be submitted to the City, tie stated
he would put a copy of the letter in the Council s
boxes.
Motion/Second: Hankner/Blanchard to adjourn the 21. Adjournment
meeting a 734 PM.
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Respectfully submitted,
Donald F. Pauley
Clerk/Administrator
1
0
DATE APPROVED: 1/23/84
PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA
Regular Meeting
�-�rri� '� 1 ,^ 7 D
January 9, 1984
-, Zvi w� Mounds View City Hall
API,
.y i Y 4r 2401 Hwy. 10, Mounds View, MN 55112
-------- -------------------------------------------------------
The Mounds View City Council was called to order
by Mayor McCarty at 7:31 PM on January 9, 1984.
MEMBERS PRESENT: CounciLaembers Linke, Hankner,
B anc ar , Doty and Mayor McCarty.
ALSO PRESENT: City Attorney Meyers and Clerk/
Administrator Pauley.
Motion/Second: Doty/Linke to approve the December
minutes as corrected.
5 ayes 0 nays
There were no residents requests or comments from
the floor.
�� �.-....- to arr-- the consent
Motion/Second: Doly�Han,.ne np--
igen a, as presented, and waive the reading of the
resolutions.
5 ayes 0 nays
Mayor McCarty pointed out the Council had just been
informed by Park Director Anderson of the wrong
transmission being placed in the truck the City
just received, and stated the problem should be
attempted to be resolved right away. He also
expressed concern with the type of seats to be
supplied in the new patrol cars, as once they are
modified to make room for the radio equipment, the
shorter patrolmen have trouble getting the seat Ear
enough forward to drive comfortably, and he
recommended bucket seats. He also stated that in
:hecking, he has found out that low gear lock -out
cannot be supplied with a tilt steering, wheel,
yet the bid received from Minor Ford includes both
options.
.1. Call to Order
2. Roil Call
3. Approval of
Minutes:
December 17, 198
Motion Carried
4. Residents Re-
quests and
Comments from
�'- Floor
5. Approval of
Consent Agenda
Motion Carried
6. Consideration of
Staff Memo Regar
ing Purchase of
Police Patrol
Vehicle
Mounds View City Council
January 9, 1984
Regular Meeting
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Page Two
Clerk/Administrator Pauley explained that the price
Staff is recommending does include bucket seats. lie
also explained that the tilt wheel steering wheel is
not to be included with the low gear lock-ouL. He
also explained that the City has frequently had
problems getting equipment the way it was bid, and
their policy is that upon delivery, the equipment
is checked over thoroughly, and a letter is sent
to the supplier if any discrepencies are noted,
and the equipment is kept, unused, in the garage
until the problem is solved, and then the City pays
for it.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley stated he will be bringing
the question of propane conversion of the two new
vehicles to the Council in the near future.
Mayor McCarty noted there was a slight difference in
the sizes of the spotlights being bid. Attorney
Meyers advised that would not present a problem.
Motion/Second: Doty/Linke to accept the bid of
Minar Forte —of $21,060.36, with the money to be
allocated from the general fund for the police
patrol vehicles.
5 0 nays
Motion Carr
ayes
Mayor McCarty closed the regular meeting and 7. Public Hearing:
De=opened the public hearing at 7:45 Pri. 5468 da of
5468 Adams Street
Dennis Qualic, 5464 Adams Street, asked why the
request was before the Council, and who had made it.
Tom Diffley explained he was a representative of
Cross of Glory Lutheran Church, who owns the property,
and they will be building an addition to the north
of their complex, and will no longer need the
present building to the south, which has been used
as an educational center for the past 15 years. He
explained they need the equity from that structure
to build the new addition to the church, and they
have found a buyer who would like to open a child
care center. He stated the Code is such that R-1
does not allow a child care center, so the property
must be rezoned so that the building can be used
again.
Mr. Diffley explained that presently the building
is used to educate the children of the congrega-
tion, and is used evenings, Saturdays and Sundays.
The proposed child care center would have between
15 and 40 small children, from 6 AM to 6 PM,
weekdays, with no nighttime use.
Mounds View City Council January 9, 1984
Regular Meeting Page Three
------------------------------------------------ ----------------------
r Pir. Qualic asked if the zoning is changed, if the
property would become commercial.
Mayor McCarty explained that due to the description
in the Comp Plan and the ordinance, it would have to
be low density residential use for R-2, and the only
business other than a home occupation that is allowed
is a child care center, and that anything else would
require further rezoning.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley explained there are a number
of State and Municipal laws that must be complied with,
and that some remodeling of the building must occur.
Mr. Diffley explained the remodeling would be more
interior than exterior, with extensive interior
remodeling required, and a ramp would have to be
installed outside, along with a fence being put up.
Mayor McCarty closed the public hearing and reopened
the regular meeting at 7:51 PM.
Motion/Second: Doty/Blanchard to have the first 8, 1st Reading of
reading of Ordinance No. 353 amending the Municipal Ordinance No. 35
Code of Mounds View by amending Chapter 41 entitled
"Specific Rezonings", and waive the reading of the
ordinance.
5 ayes 0 nays
Attorney Meyers Dresented a Dronosed take over 9.
agreement from the bonding company regarding the
Long Lake Road ditch project. He explained Willard
Davis has been chosen to complete the project, and
that he was one of the original subcontractors for
the project. He added that he and Engineering Consultant
Boxrud feel confident the project will be completed.
He also explained that an additional $200 has been
requested due to a larger area being seeded,
with $5,980.87 being the balance of the contract,
and $4,038.78 being the cost to re -let the project,
which is being assumed by the bonding company.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley stated that Willard
Davis had been doing an acceptable job earlier,
and the City is comfortable with using him now.
Motion/Second: McCarty/Doty to authorize Staff to
complete the take over agreement for the Long Lake
Road ditch project, and reject the bids the City
received on January 5, 1984 for the project.
Motion Carried
Report of
Attorney
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Mounds View City Council January 9, 1984
Regular Meeting Page Your
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Attorney Meyers recommended a letter be sent to the I
low bidder, explainingthe situation and why his bid
was rejected.
Councilmember Linke had no report. 10. Reports of
Councilmembers
Councilmember Hankner reported she had tried out
the cross country ski trails around Silver View
Park, and found them very enjoyable except for
where snowmobiles had gone through and ruined the
track for the skiers.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported that notices
have been published on the snowmobile ordinance
in the City Newsletter, and the Police have found
it nearly impossible to control the problem.
Mayor McCarty asked that a notice be sent to the
Police Department, advising them of this particular
problem.
Councilmember Blanchard had no report.
Councilmember Doty reported the Park and Rec
Commission met on January 5 and discussed the new
program for fitness and health. He also advised
that the City is in a good pusition to receive a
grant for $2,500 for a fitness trail, with the
total cost of a trail to be approximately $7,500,
and that rain L1ICGLVr Anderson has suggested
approaching Burger King to see if they would be
willing to sponsor the trail.
Mayor McCarty reported he was ready to bring before
the Council for their consideration Commissioners
would would like to continue their service to the
City.
Motion/Second: McCarty/Blanchard to reappoint to
three year terms on the Planning Commission, Peg
Mountin as Chairman for 1984, and Josey Warren.
5 ayes 0 nays
Motion Carried
Motion/Second: McCarty/Doty to reappoint to the
Park a�Commission, for a 3 year term, Wayne
Burmeister as Chairman, Ed Letendre, Wayne Weflen,
and Frank Silvis.
5 ayes 0 nays
Motion Carr*
Mounds View City Council
Regular Meeting
--------------------------------------------------
(O'N11otion/Second: McCarty/Hankner to reappoint. to the
�stivi—'ties Commission for a 3 year term Kathy
Pomerleau.
5 ayes 0 nays
January 9, 1984
Page five
-------------------
Mayor McCarty asked that the gplicants who need to
be interviewed be set up for 15 minute appointments
each at the next agenda session. lie also advised
that if any Chairmen intendsto do any interviewing,
they should do so before the last Council meeting in
January, so the Council can review their recommendations.
Motion/Second: McCarty/Hankner to direct Staff to
etermine or receive estimates of cost for a con-
sultant to serve the City in the capacity of review-
ing and determining certain considerations in the
Master Plan for the Anoka County Airport, such as
need, environmental concerns and accuracy.
5 ayes 0 nays
Clerk/Administrator Pauley presented the 1984
janitorial service bids to the Council.
Motion/Second: Linke/Hankner to award the 1984
contract for janitorial services to Jim's Building
Maintenance, subject to filing of certificate of
insurance and other general conditions specified
in the specifications.
5 aves 0 nays
Motion/Second: Linke/Hankner to adjourn the meet-
ing a' t 8 T2 M.
5 ayes 0 nays
11
Motion Carried
Motion Carried
Report of
Administrator
Motion Carried
12. Adjournment
Motion Carried