HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packets - 1984/02/13CITY COUNCIL MEETING
/ 1 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
r
February 13, 1984
7:30 p.m.
A G F N D A
1. Call to Order
2. Roll Call - Hankner, Blanchard, Doty, Linke, McCarty
3. Approval of Minutes: January 23, 1984 (Regular Meeting)
(Received copy in 2/6/84 packet.)
4. Residents Requests and Comments from the Floor
------------------------------------------------
CITI2ENS: BEFORE SPEAKING PLEASE: GIVE YOUR
FULL NAME. AND ADDRESS FOR THE MINUTES
------------------------------------------------
5. Approval of Consent Agenda
ITEM A. Approve Resolution No. 1714 Requesting Cancellation
�-, of Tax Levies for Certain Outstanding General Obli-
gation Bonds of the City of Mounds View
ITEM B. Approve Resolution No. 1715 Approving Defeasance
Program for Certain General Obligation Bonds of the
City of Mounds View
ITEM C. Approve Resolution No. 1710 Establishing a Community
Energy Council and Participation in the Governor's
Community Energy Program
ITEM D. Approve Appointment of Robert Beutel and Russell
Warren to One Year Terms and Stephen Lauterbach and
Maribeth Margo to Two Year Terms on the Energy
Council and the Appointment of Robert Beutel as
Chairperson
ITEM E. Approve Appointment of Michael Lauterbach and Betty
Johnson to Two Year Terms and Peter Sargent to a
Three Year Term on the Planning Commission
ITEM F. Authorize. Membership in the Labor Relations
Subscriber Service in 1984 at a Cost of $1,560
ITEM G. Authorize Mayor and Clerk -Administrator to Enter
into an Agreement with Mounds View Printing for the
Printing of the Five Remaining City Newsletters in
1984 at the Low Bid Price of $1,437 Per Issue
-continued-
AGENDA
February 13, 1984
Page Two
5. Approval of Consent Agenda (cunt.)
ITEM H. Approve Resolution No. 1713 Authorizing Release of
Security for 7280 Silver Lake Road
ITEM I. Approve Specifications and Bid Form for Project No.
1984-2, Well No. 2 Maintenance and Repair
ITEM J. Licenses for. Approval
ITEM K. Approve Resolution No. 1716 Approving Just and
Correct Claims Against City Funds
6. Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance No. 354 Amending the
Municipal Code of Mounds View by Amending Chapter 41 Enti-
tled, "Specific Rezonings"
7. Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance No. 355 Amending the
Municipal Code of Mounds View by Amending Chapter 40 Enti-
tled, "Zoning"
8. Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance No. 356 Establishing
Chapter 27 of the Municipal Code Entitled "Special Projects
Fund"
9. Consideration of Resolution No. 1717 Authorizing a Transfer
of Ponds From the Cpnnial Drnjortc Fsinfl fn fhn ❑oncral Rand
10. Consideration of Request for Refund on Sewer Service
Installation at 2581/83 County Road I
11. Appoint Steve Thatcher as Director of Public Works/Community
Development at a Starting Salary of $31,000/Year With a Three
Month and Six Month Adjustment of $400 and $600 Respectively
Contingent Upon Satisfactory Job Performance
12. Presentation by Robert Beutel on the Activities of the
Metropolitan Council Aviation Policy Plan Task Force
13. Report of Attorney
14. Report of Councilmembers - Hankner, Blanchard, Doty, Linke
McCarty
15. Report of Administrator
16. Adjournment
0
CONSENT AGENDA
F'ehruary 13, 1984
The Consent Agenda is a technique designed to expedite handling of
routine and miscellaneous official business of the City Council.
The entire Agenda may be adopted by the Council in one motion.
The motion for adoption is non -debatable and must receive unani-
mous approval. By request of any individual Councilmember, any
item can be removed from the Con::ent Agenda and placed upon the.
Regular Agenda for debate.
ITEM A. Adopt Resolution No. 1714 - Requesting Cancellation of
Tax Levies for Certain Outstanding General obligation
Bonds of the City of Mounds View
ITEM B. Adopt Resolution No. 1715 - Approving Defeasance Program
for Certain General Obligation Bonds of the City of
Mounds View
ITEM C. Adopt Resolution NO. 1710 - Establishing a Community
Energy Council and Participation in the Governor's
Community Energy Program
ITEM D. Approve Appointment of. Robert Beutel and Russell Warren
to One Year Terms and Stephen Lauterbach and Maribeth
Margo to Two Year Terms on the Energy Council and the
Appointment of Robert Beutel as Chairperson
ITEM E. Approve Appointment of Michael Lauterbach and Betty
Johnson to Two Year. Terms and Peter Sargent to a Three
Year Term on the Planning Commission
_L_ fL_..
ITEM F. Authorize Membership in the Labor Rmia Lions �uvnCr iu=L
Service in 1984 at a Cost of $1,560
ITEM G. Authorize mayor and Clerk -Administrator to Enter into an
Agreement wih Mounds View Printing for the Printing of
the Five Remaining City Newsletters in 1984 at the Low
Bid Price of $1,437 Per Issue
ITEM M. Adopt Resolution No. 1713 - Authorizing Release of
Security for 7280 Silver Lake Road
ITEM I. Approve Specifications and Bid Form for Project No.
1984-2, Well No. 2 Maintenance and Repair
ITEM .1. Licenses for Approval
Casino Night - Ilel-Rae Ballroom - 3/21/84
Mounds View Lions Club
General - Expire 6/30/04
Comfort Homes - New
Kozitza Construction, Inc. - New
ITEM K. Adopt Resolution No. 1716 - Approving Just and Correct
Claims Against: City Funds
7
RESOLUTION NO. 1714
RESOLUTION REQUESTING CANCELLATION OF TAX
LEVIES FOR CERTAIN OUTSTANDING GENERAL
OBLIGATION BONDS OF THE CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
WHEREAS, the City has duly issued and presently has
outstanding the following issues of general obligation bonds
(hereinafter called the "Refunded Bonds"):
Original
Outstanding
Issue
Date of Issue
Principal
Amount
Principal
Amount
General Obligation
Sewer Improvement
Bonds of 1965
April 1, 1965
$1,860,000
$ 720,000
General Obligation
Improvement Bonds
of 1966
July 1, 1966
2,640,000
1,310,000
General Obligation
Improvement Bonds
of 1968
January 1, 1968
250,000
50,000
General Obligation
Improvement Bonds
of 1971
August 1, 1971
655,000
185,000
General Obligation
Improvement Bonds
of 1974
December 1, 1974
1,680,000
870,000
for which ad valorem taxes have been levied pursuant to Minnesota
Statutes, Section 475.61, subd. 1, to pay a portion of the debt
service;
WHEREAS, the City has created within the sinking fund
established for payment of the Refunded Bonds an escrow account
(the "Escrow Account"), and has deposited in said Escrow Account
cash and securities which are general obligations of the United
States or agencies thereof, and has entered into an agreement
with Norwest Bank Minneapolis, N.A., whereby said bank will have
custody of the Escrow Account and will disburse funds from the
Escrow Account to the paying agents for the Refunded Bonds at
the times and in the amounts required to pay principal and
interest on the Refunded Bonds when due;
ity
nion from Voto,
Reardon, TalutgesS6 Co.,CLtd.),��certified dpublic an laccountants,
that the federal securities deposited in the Escrow Account mature
at such times and bear interest at such rates that the collections
Of principal and interest tlicreon, Coycthcr with the beginning
o pay Dash balance in the Account, st when duelonbtheufficient Refunded Bonds. the
principalthe City Council
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by
of the City of Mounds View, Minnesota, as follows:
there
1. Upon establishmeEundfforethecRefundedrow uBonds adequate
is now on hand in the sinking
assets to pay all principal and interest on the Refunded
Bonds to their maturity, and the taxes heretofore levied
for payment of such principal and interest are no longer
required. provide a
2. The Finance Director eCounty Auditor and to
hereby directed to
copy of this resolution to the Ramsey
ursuant to Section Wi�h61,
request that the County Auditoraxplevies, commencing
subd. 3, cancel all remaining
the year 1984, for the Refunded Bonds.
3• Nothing herein shall impair the security
ided to the holders of the Refunded Bonds,
originally prov
recognizes and affirms its ein1thelCity to the
vy
and the City ro erty
ad valorem taxes on all taxable
in the Escrow Account,
extent necessary to meet anyfunds.
if such deficiency cannot be met from other available
Adopted this _ day of February, 1984.
—�— Mayor
Attest:
City Administrator-Cler
0
f STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF RAMSEY )SS.
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW)
I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and
acting Clerk -Administrator of the City of Mounds View hereby
certify that the attached and foregoing is a true and correct
copy of a resolution duly adopted by the City Council of the
City of Mounds View at its meeting on February _, 1984, as
the same is recorded in the minutes of the meeting of such
council for said date, on file and of record in my office.
Dated this day of February, 1984.
Clerk -Administrator
5
RESOLUTION NO. 1715
RESOLUTION APPROVING DEFEASANCE PROGRAM FOR
CERTAIN GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS OF THE CITY
OF MOUNDS VIEW
WHEREAS, the City has duly issued and presently has
outstanding the following issues of general obligation bonds
(hereinafter called the "Refunded Bonds"):
Original Outstanding
Principal
Principal
Issue
Date of
Issue
Amount
Amount
General Obligation
Sewer Improvement
Bonds of 1965
April 1,
1965
$1,860,000
$ 720,000
General Obligation
Improvement Bonds
of 1966
July 1,
1966
2,640,000
1,310,000
General Obligation
Improvement Bonds
of 1968
January
1, 1968
250,000
50,000
General Obligation
Improvement Bonds
of 1971
August 1,
1971
655,000
185,006
General Obligation
Improvement Bonds
of 1974
December
1, 1974
1,680,000
870,000
and has a substantial
asset
balance
in the sinking
fund for
said Refunded Bonds;
and
WHEREAS, it appears that by (i) the purchase of
government securities which are general obligations of the
United States or agencies thereof in an amount sufficient
so that the receipts of principal and interest thereon will
be adequate to pay all principal and interest on the Refunded
Bonds as such becomes due, and (ii) the deposit of such
government obligations, together with any required beginning
cash balance, with an independent escrow agent, the security
of the holders of the Refunded Bonds will be enhanced, the
remaining taxes heretofore levied for payment of the Refunded
Bonds may be cancelled, and the remaining asset balance in
said sinking fund will be available for general expenditure
by the City.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council
of the City of Mounds View, Minnesota, as follows:
1. The actions of the City administration in
purchasing the required government obligations, arranging
for their deposit with Norwest Bank Minneapolis, N.A.,
as escrow agent, and arranging for the preparation of the
necessary escrow agreement are hereby approved and ratified.
2. The form of Escrow Agreement between the City
and Norwest Bank Minneapolis, N.A., a copy of which has been
presented to the Council, is approved, and execution of said
Agreement by the Mayor and City Administrator is approved and
ratified.
Adopted this _ day of February, 1984.
Mayor
Attest:
City Administrator-Clerl:
171
STATE, OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF RAMSEY )SS.
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW)
I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and
acting Clerk -Administrator of the City of Mounds View hereby
certify that the attached and foregoing is a true and correct
copy of a resolution duly adopted by the City Council of the
City of Mounds View at its meeting on February , 1984, as
the same is recorded in the minutes of the meeting of such
council for said date, on file and of record in my office.
Dated this _ day of February, 1984.
Clerk -Administrator
RESOLUTION NO. 1713
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
)ZESOLUTION AUTHORIZING RELEASE OF
SECUR.PPY FOR 7280 SILVER LAKE ROAD
WHEREAS, John Mezzen,.ia received approval from the
Mounds View City Council to relocate a single family dwelling
into Mounds View on June 1, 1977; and
WHEREAS, the City of. Mounds view required John
Mezzenga to furnish a $1,000 security to assure completion of
the conditions for the relocation of the single family dwel-
ling; and
WHEREAS, the conditions for the relocation either have
been met or are no longer required;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council
of the City of Mounds View authorizes the release of the $1,000
security with interest to John Mezzenga.
rT:
! 11 1liJ 1
(SEAL)
Adopted this 13th day of February, 1984.
Mayor
Clerk -Administrator
1 MEMO TO: Clerk -Administrator and City Council
FROM: Building Inspector.
DATE: February 8, 1984
SUBJECT: PROJECT 84-2 - WELL NO. 2 MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR
Attached for your review and approval are the specifications,
bid form and public hearing notice for the above named project.
Besides the notice, a mailing of these materials will be W
ent
to the following companies who have bid on previous City well
maintenance projects:
Layne Minnesota Company
3147 California Street N.E.
Minneapolis, MN 55418
Tri-State Drilling & Equipment Co.
16940 Righway 55 West
P.O. Box 548
Wayzata, MN 55391
Bergerson-Caswell, Inc.
P.O. Box. 367
_ 5115 Industrial Street
Maple Plain, MN 55359
Keys Weil Drilling Co-
413 North Lexington Parkway
St. Paul, MN 55104
Should the Council wish it to be sent to others, please let staff
know.
Should you have any questions regarding this project, please
feel free to contact me.
Thank you.
SAR/bc
Attachments
rAW
kEQUES'T FUR VID UN WELL AND PU1411 114Sd9XT.LON AND k19-Alk
MOUNDS VIEW, MINNESOTA
NOTICE IS IIEREbY GIVEN that sealed bids will be received by the
Clerk -Administrator in the City Hall until 10:00 a.m., February 29, 1984,
at which time bids will be publicly opened and read •aloud for the
inspection and repair of Well No. 2. Specifications will be available
at the Mounds View City Ball, 2401 Highway 10, Mounds View, Minnesota.
The bids will be tabulated and subsequently considered by the City
Council at the City Hall on March 12, 1984.
(Bulletin: February 16, 1984)
Donald F. Pauley
Clei k-i,drin is tra tvr
SPECIFICATIONS
FOR
PUMP MAINTENANCE
WELL 1,2
CITY 01: MOUNDS VIEW, PJINNESOTA
GENERAL SPECIFICATIONS:
1. Description of ProjecL - These Specifications cover the removal,
inppection and repair of the deep well turbine pump. This main-
tenance project is for pump at Well No. 2, City of Mounds View,
Minnesota.
2. Location of Project - The well is located on City owned property
at 2524 Bronson Drive, Mounds View, Minnesota as shown on attached
sketch.
3. Scope of Work - The contractor shall furnish all equipment, tools,
labor and materials required to: move in and move out; disconnect
motor and piping; pull pump; transport to shop; dismantle for
inspection; detennine needed repairs; make repairs; return pump
to job -site; re -install pump; connect all piping, wiring, etc.;
test pump well to waste; disinfect well; and place pump back in
service. It is the intent of these specifications to secure a
complete job, and the contractor shall so perform, whether
specifically covered herein or not.
4. Pulling and Replacing Pun - The contractor shall furnish the
proper equipment to adequately pull and replace the pump without
doing damage to the pumphouse and appurtenances or pump. The
contractor shall repair any damage to the well site and pump
house.
5. Inspection and Repair of Pump - The pump shall be transported to
the contractor's shop, dismantled, cleaned and inspected for
necessary repairs. The needed repairs shall be determined and
approved by the Clerk -Administrator.
6. Materials and Parts - All replacement parts and materials shall be
equal to or better than the pump's manufacture's specifications.
-2-
1. The Contractor shall afford the City of Mounds View personnel the
opportunity to inspect parts determined to need repair or replace-
ment prior to coimiencement of repair or disposal of parts.
B. Well and pump equipment shall be completely disinfected per
Minnesota Department of Health procedures prior to placing well and
pump back in service. Water sample test shah oe proviaeo oy
Contractor certifying well has been adequately disinfected.
9. Well shall be continusously test pumped to waste at a rate of 1400
gallons per minute for at least 10 hours or until water is flowing
clear whichever is greater. Contractor shall furnish all piping,
valves, pressure gauges, orifice and other necessary equipment.
Discharge point is shown on attached sketch. Any damage caused by
test pumping shall be repaired by Contractor.
10. Bid Price shall include labor to install or affect all repairs
determined necessary after inspection of pump. Separate
bid prices are requested for various repair and replacement items.
Estimated quantities for repair and bid comparisons have been
made. Final repair quantities shall be approved in writing by
the Clerk -Administrator of Mounds View. Final Contract price
jllYll bA UUJ Yi UU4 p- unit bid pr1— and final proved repair
work.
11. The base bid provides for a nominal amount of bailing of the well.
After initial removal of pump the Contractor shall submit to the
City for approval an estimated maximum volume of material necessary
to be bailed from the well to reestablish original well depth.
Final payment shall be based on actual cubic yard volume of material
bailed from well.
12. Contract Award shall be based on lowest responsible bid received
for Base Bid items. The City may elect to award additional work
listed in the alternate bid schedule. The City reserves the right
to wavier minor irregularities and/or reject all bids.
n
f
C
The undersigned agree(s) to begin the above work and to have the said
work completed on or before _ _
�(To'be filled in by Contractor y
All price quotations must be written with typewriter or ink and must
be signed with ink. Unsigned price quotations will not be considered.
All quotes must be submitted on this form and enclosed in a sealed
envelope addressed to the City of Mounds View, 2401 Highway k10,
Mounds View, Minnesota 55112. Mark envelope Well N.2 Bid Proposal.
The undersigned hereby agree(s) to perform the work above at the quoted
prices.
Comparison bids will be based on the total base bid.
Signed
Firm Name
Address
Phone
By
Name of Officer signing Firm name
and his official capacity.
Date
Month Day Year
CPROPOSAL FOR
PUBLIC III [LITIES f AIN'ITNAMA: PROJECT
PUMP MAINTENANCE WELL p
CITY 01: MOUNDS VIEW, MINNESOTA
RID PROPOSAL FORM
This bid proposal (price quotation) is due at 10:00 a.m.
February 29, 1934.
Public Utilities Department
City of Mounds View
' 2,I011lighway 10
Mounds View, Minnesota 55112
Dear Sir,
Having inspected the site and specifications as prepared for the purpose
of Well No. 2 inspection and repair,
hereby propose(s) and agrco(s) to furnish all labor, tools, materials
and supplies to perform a complete repair service for the City of
Mounds View, Minnesota. This work is to be performed in strict accordance
with the plans and specifications.
The City of Mounds View will tabulate the price quotations received
and select the contractor,
1110 PROPOSAL
Item
Est i ilia t ed
Quantity
Unit
Price
Extended
Price
1.
Remove, dismantle, inspect,
and reinstall pwnp
L.S.
L.S.
$
2.
'Pest Pumping of 11011
10 lilt
$-/III(
$
3.
Bailing
C.Y.
$
/C.1'.
$
4.
Replace Spiders
13 EA
$
/EA
$
S.
*Replace Column Bearings
13 EA
$
/EA
$
6.
*Clean and Paint Column Pipe
Suction Pipe
80 L.P.
$
/L.F.
$
7.
*Replace Column Pipe
70 L.I.
$—/L.
F.
$
8.
*Clean and Paint Line Shaft
70 L.F.
$—/L.
F.
$
9.
*Roplace Line Shaft
70 L.F.
$—/
L. F.
$
10.
Disinfect well prior to
placing back in service
L.S.
L.S.
$
TOTAL BASE BID
11. furnish Video 'Taped picture
of well casing 645 L.F. $—/L. F. S
12. Pump Parts, if required
a. suction pipe L.S. L.S. $
b. complete new bowl
assembly EA EA $
*Items 4, S, 6, 7, 8, & 9 to be adjusted per actual findings after pump
inspection. 0
r
WL•'LI, NO. 2 '
2524 BRONSON DRIVE
DESCRIPTION OF LAYNE PUMP:
1. Johnson IIG-200 Gear Drive
2. Layne and Bowler Pump
3. Pump Setting, 290 Feet
4. Column Pipe Size, 10 Inches
5. Shaft Size, 1-11/16 Inches
6. Bowl Type 15 Inches DRLC 4-Stage 1150 GPM at 345 Feet
7. Suction, 10 Feet by 10 Inches
DESCRIPTION OF WELL NO. 2:
1, inner Casing Diameter, 16 Inches
2. Length of Inner Casing, 645 Feet
3. Well Depth, 835 Feet
4. Static Level, 224 Feet
l0',0;,U'i'T0N PQ. 1716
CT'1'y Of MOUR1:6 VT11"M
COUNTY OF RAM; EY
;iTiil'li OY h!]I1Uh..In'I'A
APPROVING JUST Alin coiaC'f
CLATM AGAINST CITY i!111r,
i
vair?le.M; the NV Connr.il of Mound:; V?ew, Pursuant, to
?:!innesota Statutes 4]2.:;1, has full authority overthe financial affairs
01' the City and;
V1HET0iAl1, The CiL^ Coun,ril has revic';Md the ulnims numbers:
17344 througl, 17348 in the amount of $ 231.56
17349 throurb 17372
in the mnnunt of ..^p 83,070.27
12881 Lhrough 13042 in the amount of 3 91,154.55
through in the amount of $
T0TA1. AIAOUW'f or 1;T.iJ1,13 PRESENTED s
174,456.38
and has found said claims to be just and correct;
(list of any exception)
mmu mnlmEFORE, be it. rem7ved that the City Council of Mounds View
,. by the
hereby approved the attnehed lists oC claims doted
vote ayes nayes
ATTEST:
(SEAL)
Mayor
Cler—� '<—AdminFtraLor —
C
CHECK
17344
17346
17347
17348
ADDITIONAL. DIRECT EXPENDITURES
AMOUNT
CLAIMANT
54.00
Wallace Mortenson
7.80
MN Mutual Life
45.00
Duane Hagen
124.76
Brand Cameras, Inc.
$231.56
PURPOSE
Supplies, utilities
Insurnace
Insurance
Camera
CITY OFMCUNOSVIIW 6Cr0U`c T -� PA YA HLF
CHF[Kv A P, U ,l T C L A 1 r- t N T
IATE 07.14-A4 PAGf 1
P U g P G S r
017147
11363..5
LMrlt 11:401I PAIT FLAN
GSOUP INSURANCE
0173fi4
19157.T5
GROUP HEALTH PLAN Ikr•
SALARIrS. krrIILAR
17+r`•
64.10
FTOELTIY AND ''.l!A.AITY
G^CUP INS014,4CE
P17i�4
90.00
RICHA90 NHITF
RrFUNh5...__.--
P17'.G7
303.A0
U S POSTNA5TF0
POSTAGF
01731,14
EA.'0
OAh NATHII:ON
';ALAPIES.Ti`!P.PA4T TINE
0173h0
31.P0
UNIVERSITY OF PIhNESCIA
TRAINING
017161
A00.00
U S POStNASTER
POSTAGE .—_..
017364
6P.909
CUP FOfiO', STOFF.
HISr. CFrirr SUPPLIES
017166
550.00
JON MICHNA
SUPPLIE5,0PE?AIING
017367
2t296.tA
STATE WASURE12
PrNSTONS------.�
017368
2132A.15
STATE I? S - P C 6 A
PINSICNS
017369
300925.41
FIRST STATE DANK Of
SALARIES, REWILAR
AND-SALAPIE.S9TF•4PIPART TIME
017370
IF
C173,A
v 01736.1
- 017365
e�' 017111
24
129.52 RFC?EOGIC' COPP SUPPLIESrpPF'•ATIi16
100.00 JURY JOHNSCN SALARIESYit::�+PpRI TIME-_ -.-
4404.16 STATE T2EAS - P is R A PENSIONS
42a.00 CHANNASSEN DINNER, IHEATP P C r U N 0
441616.n9-F7.55T &TATE 6AhK OF rALAgICSt xE6ULAP.
15P.00
36C*33
9? 0.00
1.'97.'.9
'96.45
30 62 2.50
03.070.27
ANO-SALARIESoTEMPWART TIME
ANO-OVERTIME, REGULAR
STAT% TJs4SUI1C9 SUPPLIESYOPE«CTING — --
&OdCRT L;l ififfif. FROGRAM IhjT.cuCIORS
SYSTEMS .PESEAPOM ASSCC OTNCQ PROFESSIONAL SERY
STATE TR:ASURFP o E F U N 0
CONMISSIP4 R Of 6EVENUE R E F U N D
JOHN C JOHhSON OTMCR PROFESSIONAL SERY
ANO-ACHIN, CHARGES PAYABLF.
?J'CESSARY E W NDITLRES SINfF, LAST COUNCIL NErtlNT,
e
0
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
CHECK* A N C II 11 T
'-
O12ae3
�012AA5
olzea6
of PAS?
t'AAA
IA.
01?Aa9
012h90
,i
Oti
^1?991
01280?
e1?cnt
i
41?n9
t,
A I,
912P�•
-�
012e97
�012e9e
---412e99
OS29D0
`"'01290!
ACC CU•! T S P A YA 11LE
CLAIVr,N'
AMEPICAN PCO CMSS
Am7QIr,AN T(OL SUPPLY INC
?26.7a EARL F A�iGtjiSrN i ASSOC
140600 e4011 ELrcTRTr,
24,u0 CPiPPrki SPPTNGS CC-P
6.72 COTTENS 1t.6
50.00 O IC PPOPt is T V TAR AT 1O6
59.10 ;{NEFdL 'LZCT SUP-)IY CC
4Flo 49 W N ORAIMCFP INr,
17195 TNcTY.PR10S
1F9.L•4 J C AUT9 SUrPtI
1.40 L'INC LAKE 56
Lc ruwc
4G,., C71TY OF WOUNDS VTE4
M EO HUNICILITE
�27.?4 NCH @nIGHTON HOWE
13902 NEH p41GHTON HONE.
6076 NEW ORIGHTCN HCWE
39413@43 PAOSEY COUNTY TREASURER
129,00 E !I,15 SALES 0 SEQVICE
14,°0 ROAD RUNNER PAPCF.L SEP
16TE 12.14-64 PAG' 2
PCINTING
SUPPLICS,CPERATTNG _-- —
ANO-SUPPLIES, VEHIrLF
SCPPLiES,OF•f.�i;Nc,------
OTH•.'R PROFES,ICSAL SEQV
9FNTAL, 2:rJU1 :OF !.1
AND-SCPPLICS, C[If *;TTN,
MOTOR FUELS , LU'A.ICANTS
SALARIES,TrNr,pArtt I,ME
5UPPLIE5 OPFaAI;N•
SUPPLIES, EQUIPMENT
PPINTING
SUPPLIES, EQUIPPE'IT
A14-SLPPLIM UNICLE _.---
SUPPLIES,OPERATING
Ut+E!+�'LOY"ENT COHP
Wit' ,'���• :s
SUPPLIES, VEHICLE
SUPPLIES, CLnGS4GRN0s
ANO-SUPPLIF.S,nPERATING
ANO•SUPPIIE.S, UtIL1T ILS
SUPPLIES,OPERATING
A040-SUPPLIFSr OW-1:+001110S
AND -SUPPLIES, UTILITIES
ANO-SUPPLIES, VEHICLE
SUPPLIES, OIDGS*GPNOS — T;
CONT, SVCS,r RAHSEY CNTV ---
SUPPLIES,OPFPATTN
C^NT, SVCS„ DELIVERY
&4
r
CITY OF H'U!:fi; V!;N
CHECK• A M 0 U N I
IOEt902
---atM3
D12904
e.f2905
„I
012906
o� ---L'12907
�; "
01290A
��
l'
al2409
a>zeiz
,017914
et?" S
�-
a1291h
o1z917
0f29fA
017919
Ot2970
01292i
012922
48441
3 9.72
34496
158460
GA28e0
2014,88
6092
'25,69
4,25
25'J, 69
2010
A 64 Ca
96800
14,00
361*25
37r41
17.70
19.96
it AS
1r`+2n,rn
?73, 80
S1 PAUL ANC, SU6UROAN
SNYOF-75 ORUG STORES
S+'PING LAYS PASK LLMOFr
ZACKS INC
G(NERAL C' °MLNIOnTh:4'.
TKOA
Dr No OAVIES r CC
LAND CLgr , 1'(juIPHfNT
FONSINER SALES INC
JIM HATCH SALES CO INC
MTtE +raNcv
ENIC NAaa:u
DENNIS JRONNELL
POY(1TL 4fLLf.t`
AT+T INFOSMATICN 4-IS1.MS
AL!IIhSON
ALLY GKV-141C SOPLI
ANEPICAN LINEN SUPPLI CO
AMERICAN 700L SUPPLY INC
AUTOMATIC CL;LCE OOOR CO
PACON FLfGTRT'-.
WWI 35,.^9 ROLGF) PU,tLICATTONS
1112924 799.00 ORIGHTON TRAVEL INC
40925 ?24105 NPIGHTON VETEVINARI HO,P
L i
P U' P 0 S
GRANTS 1 SUBSTOIFS
5UPPLIES,OPck41IN0 --_
:iI,PPLTES,UPE+:Afi+IG
MOTOR FUELS f LURPICANTS
AND-SUPPLIES,OPFRATING
ECLii'HLN(
QTHCA PRQFE3;10NAL SERV--
SUFPL IES,OPEQA TIN(,
SUPPLIFS, CQUIPNF.NT
SUPPLIES,OPERATING
SUPPLICS90PEPATING
R E F U N—
RCFUN --
R C F U 11 f 1
OTHER PRGFES I06AL c,.aV ;
COMMURICLTI0f15-TcLEPh(NE---- `
SUPPLTES,OPERATIN6
SUPPLIES,OPFR,ATING _
ANO-PRINTING ----�'
CLEANING -TOWELS 4 %GS ---�k
SUPPLIES,OPERATING
EQUIP►'ENT �''�
SUPPLIES, IL''GS+G'HOS
LNO-REPAIRS, F.OlII'r+EMi
PkINTING
CONfCFENCES
OTHER PROFCSSIONAL SEAV
b�
;'1
s__ — — — — — — — — — --- --
GITY OF HQUNW; 'V; r ti n C r, c u !: T r r; L I
CHF.r,K" ANC u J T C L n I" T
T�012926
012977
012928
012929
012930
012931
�I,r
C12933
012934
41?9E5
012936
012937
-
Ol?93a
Ol?9l9
012940
is
912942
412943
'' I--
012944
�.;I
012045
:1?T+4�:
,
rF
��,
012949
bG
172.00 OUFQOUGHS COOPCPATION
?1617,00 CAPITAL FLECTP0NIC5
725.99 CASE POWLP 0 EGUIPN£NT
41?.(4 CONTRACT CLEANING
L6 ',(C
CO°Y DUPLICATING PFOC
2.5aA?
COTTENS TNC
57,T,n
r,RONSTROPS
lE.70
^hyrt rpr',T 'cos
20,00
019 PPOPE+'TY Tt.W ION
119446,45-_
C.Hr IRUp_ i rr..L,' H CIV
653.E0
Gr,re+e'' ATfiLFTIC SUFPLY
4044
GOPHER CEA?INr CO
408,69
r.(,PHFN ELFr,TPTC
90
14AWKINS C!tCNICAL INC
30,60
HFALY LAdOPAtORIES
KA0,rO
TNAFV1714100 T SCHL DIS 01
�1.E5
J C. AUTO SUPPLY
87.i9 Lt8WZ MF4
94.5A
Lf-AGUE-OF tl1NN rITIFS
i,157,r2.
LTIIIF. SUI'1!RPAN NEMS
5.1,6E9
F-!.CA 31'ORT5WfAr
160.29
VAN-O-LM
19.50
MFTeC FONE COMM
.;. 0 -14-n4 FAG; 4
PUgr03 •
RISC OFFICE SUPPLTES •
EOUTVHENT -- - s
AtJO-i�FP4l!>, EOUIPVFNT o
SUPPLIES• i.OUIPMENI -- -, •
SUPPLIES, OLOGS+GRND9 _!.,.'I• 4Ia0-JANITOP SMILE
N1'PA1RSr
UNIFOgHS + CLOTHING
'
SALARTES97EMP WART TIME
r'OUIPMENT
v
UI!IFOuMS 4 C0T+•TAJ:
SUPPLIES! EQUIPHENt -,
6:
ELECTUICITY
SUPOLT-S,OPERATING
4
OTHEN PROFESSIONAL SEAV
SVPPLTESrOPF,GATINL-
J
SUPPLIES, VEHICLE
"
ANO-rUPPLIEA.+ EQUIPMENT-
4
ANO-EOUIPNENT
1si
SUPPLIESs rOUIPNF,N(-------=
AN0-t•QUIPY.ENT
�;;
OCOKS PEttiIQotC4ls-------
LEGAL NOTICES
UNIFOPMS + CLOTHING
I;
SUPPLIES! aW4, S*GJ-''NOS----
iee
OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERV
;m
----------------------•-----------
f,ITY CF
MCUPOS V1EH
A C
r
C U r;
I
� P A P A it L i
OATf
".?-14-
�.
4 !`Aii!( 5
(N'^.K•
A M 0 U }i T
C
L
A i !'
E
N T
P U
P
7 1 P
42C.75
35141
HiOIANJt p, f,OUl:TS
!+"ia0 uAStE COT,tRnl C6PIN
r!(W Nir:A" FORD iNC
MN CHIEF; !IF Fr,LICE ASS
MINN FIRE INC
499a?6 N W BELL I "LEP HONE' CO
11C.,.0--OONALO PAULCY
141.60 PEPSI COLA OOTTLINC CO
20153 )ACIC SHACK
17.00 T IN RAM+'..^.riFR
91544,SO RANSFY COUNTY iREASURFR
22170 RADII POINTING
U6#60 PAMELA S ROSE
?11.t9 S / T OFFJCF PQICUCTS
- 35,10 S 0 S OFFICE EQUIPMENT
3715C SAFE-T-FLARE OF P.M INC
241.31 SATELLITE INGUSTPIES
It77-0.70 SHORTH F.LLIOTT ANU
81094.5E SPRING, L+S PARK FIRE CEPT
?4.99 ST PAUL SOCKWATICNERY
13.75 -,TATE TP,EASURER
1,n07.91 TE%GAS
F E f U N 0
SUPPLIESIOPE ArING ----
SUPPLIESI EQUIPMENT
MEMSEPSHIPS
SUFPLIr51CPEATING ---
ME mor �SH1Pc
SUPPLIES► 8L3C:S#GgNOS
ANO-SUPPLIES1I)MATING
COHMUNICAI'UNS- TELEPHONE
MJLEkGi ----------�'
I'.
R E F U N D
EQUIPMENT
CONFE'LNCES --
i°
OTHER PROFESSIONAL SEgV n
ANO-SNOW PLOWING-SANOINQ----�;
AND -TRAFFIC SIGNALS d ELCCf
I,
PRINTING -- --�
a NL
w...1 F. . ni-w.,
Cal 1C�r
w -Cw..
HTSC CFFICT SUPPLI"S
—�„
RLPAIr:S9 EGUIFHENI "
RENTAL- EQUIPNCNT
SATELLITES
u
OTHER PROFE5520NAL SERV.
i"
OTHER PROFESSIONAL SCRV
5UPPLIESI0PER4T;NG
SUPPLIE510Pu4TiN5
INVENTORY
'9
F E f U N 0
SUPPLIESIOPE ArING ----
SUPPLIESI EQUIPMENT
MEMSEPSHIPS
SUFPLIr51CPEATING ---
ME mor �SH1Pc
SUPPLIES► 8L3C:S#GgNOS
ANO-SUPPLIES1I)MATING
COHMUNICAI'UNS- TELEPHONE
MJLEkGi ----------�'
I'.
R E F U N D
EQUIPMENT
CONFE'LNCES --
i°
OTHER PROFESSIONAL SEgV n
ANO-SNOW PLOWING-SANOINQ----�;
AND -TRAFFIC SIGNALS d ELCCf
I,
PRINTING -- --�
a NL
w...1 F. . ni-w.,
Cal 1C�r
w -Cw..
HTSC CFFICT SUPPLI"S
—�„
RLPAIr:S9 EGUIFHENI "
RENTAL- EQUIPNCNT
SATELLITES
u
OTHER PROFE5520NAL SERV.
i"
OTHER PROFESSIONAL SCRV
5UPPLIESI0PER4T;NG
SUPPLIE510Pu4TiN5
INVENTORY
'9
EITY OF HCUNIV VINN
CH:CK• A M U N T
rN
01297T 91.60
C,
312977
n1z97P
^1297?
012980
012981
012992
017983
0t2984
012995
81�986
nr�gRf
Q1798X
G1?qe9
012990
,y
11?991
012992
�.'
112993
r;
•�,h
fl°`ly4
I
�E".
01299h
35000
119,54
7, 11
140,67
66,00
260,A0
171, 50
6J,75
77.rp
27.9Q
338.75
L60.0O
96.75
45.00
T6r.!10
L I,A•' 1
�aa.3a
63,75
r
f
C U N
T^
P A P A I. !
n;11:
n1-14-L4
% Gi:
C
L
A I"
A
H T
PUS
P
O t'
MAUREEN THIELEN
N R TOLL 1'GMPANY
THIN CITY ENGTNF. PECLILG
UNTTOr. R-PTALS SYSTFN
UNI VdITY OF HIN11
VENPURG QOE CC
MINE, CHE'dPCLET
VINIKGS APPRGVED SAFETY
WASTE MANAGFNFNT MLAINE
V HL EOUTPHE,NT CC
SUSAN BEQN14AGAN
LEME -MCS
AAAaN FAHrMANN--
VAlFAIF PISC,NFF
PAPCIA Fi''::
DEE MAGE+IORN
OAVIO A JOHNSON
PAUL JOHN°ON
JUGITH -JONCS
806 LINOIERG
7EANNA MOalENSOH
41LE MOSS
9RETY OHNSTAD
PPOGgAM INSTRUCTORS
SUPPLIESr EQUIPMENT
AHO-EGUIPNfrIr
ANC SUPPLIf ,rJP!.QAT
SUPPLIESr 011 PMENT
UIITFORHS r CIOTHINr..
AHD-CLEANING-TONFLS
TRAINING
SUPPLIESr VEHICLE
SUPPLIESr VEHICLE
SUPPLIESrOPC,RATIN6 -
REFUSE COLLECTION
SUPPLIES, OLOGSrGRNC
PR.OGAAM INSTRUCTORS--
PROGRAM INSTRUCTORS
PROGRAM INSTRUCTORS
PROGRAM INSPUCTO+S-
POGGAAp INST:,uC10NS
OTH:q PROFESSIONAL S
— PROGRAM INS NUCTORS-
PRCGaA� I►+Sfsur,YD��
PPOGOAM INSTRUCTORS
PROGRAM ItlSTRUCTORS--
PROGRAM INSTRUCTORS
PROGRAM INSTRUCTORS
PROGAAN INST«uGTp:1S--
PROGRAM INM-.UCT0-5
CITY Or
MOUN95 VILLA
f. r
C
O U; T' P A Y A; L 1.
' CM° CK
A N O U
C
L
A I '+ A N T
. +1
017997
A17GaR
3 f�
r �'I... U1l000
C13OG1
ee 13002
:i 413013
'- P13DP4
`!F 013006
ft' All 007
013009
0t 1010
k' 013012
013ft13
�!`.• ^iT014
k. 013015
'' -- 011016
013117
r1 013018
813019
�i.� 013022
r'
013071
97.50 DANA PrM.:t,IrAU
9C.00 JCNI VAN ilF.K
166.90 GENFFAL UPMUNICATI0h5
66.00 SCPCC LA80PATOPIES
2t&96.01 TKOA
104.00 IFSTETNE.7 '.ORPORAT JON
227.50 KEN LELN
40.00 KLIHY ORAGCP.
2AJEAN MILL1�'
349.51 JERRYS FINISHING TOUCH
tfi.^0 RICHARC KASKINEN
15.30 MLPVALYN M,CENKER.
35.00 JOANIE NOTARO
14.00 JfrFFQY NYGAAQO
2 B. l0 HOLLY I' 61 R
28.^.0 KILLIAM S.OEOQING
X 2. al -M-LASSLN
19."0 WY AIM PPESCOTT
12.00 KELLY REARM
12.n0 OE ANN HAKES
12.00 LISA KULUV4P
15.00 HAOEL MAJZNER
22.00 ROSELYN NA►REL
15.00 'cTNFL .I'1huCON
30.A0 GRACE LAMC;
PATC ^i'-14-14 PAr,r 7
P U P P r S r
PFOGRAH INSTRUCTOPS
PROGPAH IHSTRU004S _.._
FrrAT-:Sf ulU[nMCNI
QEP., SLOGS f GROUNUS
OTHER PRaFESSI011AL SEPV
MIPF0 SUPFLI" S
PGOGRAM INSTRUCTOAC
PP060AN INSTPUCtOPS
R C F U 14 C
SUPPLIESIOPERATTNG
RF,F UN0
RF. F UNU
POSTAGE
OTHER PROFESSIONAL SEAV--
R F. F U N 0
R E F U N 0
_..GCANIS & Vj.gSjnTES ---
F r F U N O
PEFUNp�
7 r F U N
G' ? F U N 0
REFU1i
R F F U N D _-- -- P. E F U N
�EFUP; ---
■ 101
1 •1
1 43
-------------------
OIIY CF
m%wiS
k"' 6
1 C
,•
C o
-------
,, T -, n v .. L
��
'A. A
C+iFCK•
I
!, T
r
L
A iN
A N T
P u
riPO;E
013022
3 %."
ROPF.P,T WEL Ty
-013023
30.3n
aruLTTI K;USELL
00OL-4
4;.:^,
GREGG H1110goCA,Ec
F 613025
43.00
LARRY W091G
- -011626
70.g6
nAUCR LfAFcLAn
t- 013027
7•;.67
9ATHY ;Z 'f+
--<il1028
f.04
CARF. AIRCONO 4 HT(;, 1++:
0130?.9
?4.51
m • J r,RAPEPIFS
I 013030
55.00
MASON PUI;LISHTNG CC
r--413031 -
96.55
ELFMORF AQUATIC
I Q1393?
44.20
HfiFFhA�i •��.P'n?f5
013033
10.00
MN POLICE • PI ACE ASSN
' -- 3 34 _-
�! 0
_ _ _ _ 15.,0
N
TUT GoNF OF 9LCG OFF
_013035
172.00
OTT SOCCFQ SLPPLY. INC.
013036
19o42A.52
KORTPUMOS SALES/SEAV INC
-----011037
3P.4P
,APY PAYMENT
011036
40.,'0
C-c^'rLL REYNOLDS
013039
5910mO
SPgINGSTEO INC
---- 413040
15840
MONICA COAX
013041
15.00
PAVIO LONG
013e42
35.00
4 H SAUUR
- 162
91,154055
CHECKS WPITTEN
TOTAL OF
06 CHECKS TOTAL 1141 '240?
RF.FUNOS
REFUNCS
PI'FUN"S
I
kFFUNCS--------
RF F UNO
AN0-kLfUNCS
i; 6 f U tJ 0 -----
ANO-PEFUNOS
A FUND _--_-- h
CuILOINGS 4 STRUCTll�
ROOKS + PF,RTOOICALS ;I
I:
SURPLICS.OP.R4iING -- '
,
n
�LP_LIEJ.'IPf RM1L'1 �• --I1•
MCMREHSMIPS i;;
I"
ROOKS • PC9IQn1f.ALC
u
ct'P0LI.'.SrOPE'-ATIN6
EQUIPMENT
REFUNDS
PCFUNDS I,
u
OTHEQ PROF%SSIONAL SO
tv
v
„
gC,F U N 0
fe
DEPOSITS- 9UILOW USAGE fee
ORDINANCE NO. 354
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
(ool�,N COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF MOUNDS VIEW
BY AMENDING CHAPTER 41 ENTITLED, "SPECIFIC RE7,ONINGS"
The Council of the City of Mounds View does hereby ordain:
SECTION I. 41.14. Pursuant to Chapter 40.23, the Official
Mounds View zoning map is hereby amended to reflect the following
rezoning:
Subdivision 1. That part of Lot 1, Block 10, Silver Lake
woods, according to the recorded plat thereof, Ramsey County,
Minnesota described as follows:
Beginning at the most easterly corner of said Lot 1; thence
south 41 degrees 32 minutes 15 seconds west on an assumed
bearing along the southeasterly line of said Lot 1, a
distance of 28.95 feet; thence southwesterly along the
southeasterly line of said Lot 1 on a tangential curve,
concave to the north, having a radius of 366.26 feet, a
central angle of 33 degrees 43 minutes 06 seconds, an arc
length of 215.54 feet, a chord of 212.44 and a chord bearing
of south 58 degrees 23 minutes 49 seconds west; thence north
48 degrees 29 minutes 33 seconds west, non -tangent to said
curve, a distance of 67.12 feet; thence north 0 degrees 00
minutes 30 seconds west, a distance of 111.85 feet; thence
north 41 degrees 30 minutes 27 seconds east, a distance of
148.48 feet to a point on the northeasterly line of said Lot
1, distant 203.00 feet northwesterly of the point of
beginning; thence south 48 degrees 29 minutes 33 secons east
along said northwesterly line, a distance of 203.00 feet to
the point of beginning, is rezoned from 1-1 to B-3.
This ordinance shall take effect thirty days after the date
of its publication.
Read by the Council of. the City of Mounds View on the 23rd
day of January, 1984.
Read and passed by the Council of the City of Mounds View
this day of , 1984•
ATTEST:
Mayor --
(SEAL)
APPROVED AS TO FORM: C1erk-Administrator
City Attorney
1
ORDINANCE NO, 355 t %
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE MUNICIPAL. CODE OF MOUNDS
VIEW BY AMENDING CHAPTER 40 ENTITL.ED, "ZONING"
The Council of the City of Mounds View does hereby ordain:
SECTION I. Chapter 40.02, Subd. B, is amended by deleting
the following definitions:
(8) Boarding (House) Home - Foster Children. A family
dwelling where children out of their own homes are
cared for.
(23) Day Care - Home. A family dwelling in which foster
care, supervision and training of children of school
or pre-school age who are cared for during established
business hours.
(24) Da Care - Group Nursery. A service provided to the
public, in which children of school or pre-school age
are cared for during established business hours.
SECTION II. Chapter 40.02 is amended by adding the
following definitions in their proper numerical order and
renumbering all other definitions, as necessary:
(23) Day Care Facility. A facility as defined under Mn.
Statutes 295.782, Subd. 5.
(24) Day Care Facility, Licensed. A facility as defined
under Mn. Statutes 245.782, Subd. 5, as regulated by
Mn. Statutes 245.812, Subd. 3.
(91) Residential Facility. A facility as defined under
Me. Statutes 245.782, Subd. 6.
(92) Residential Facility, Licensed. A facility as defined
under Mn. Statutes 245.782, Subd. 6, as regulated by
Mn. Statutes 245.812, Subd. 3.
SECTION III. Chapter 40.07, Subd. H(2) is amended to read
as follows:
(2) Boarding House, Residential Facility (Non -licensed)
servingSix (6) or More Persons, Residential Facility,
Licensed, Serving Seven (7) or More Persons,
Fraternity House, and Sororit- Lly Ouse. At least two
(2) parking spaces for each three (3) persons for whom
accommodations are provided for sleeping.
Ordinance No. 355
Page Two
SECTION IV. Chapter 40.07, Subd. If (13) is amended to read
as follows:
(13) Sanitarium, Cnnvalescent Home Rest Home, Nursinc�Home,
t -Bap-Nursery Day Care Facility (Non-licensr-dj
Serving Six (6) or More Persons, and Day Care
Facility, Licensed, Serving Eleven (11) or More
Persons. four (4) spaces plus one(I) -space for each
three (3) beds for which accommodations are offered.
SECTION V. Chapter 40.10, Suhd. H is amended to read as
follows:
(1) Single Family Detached Dwellings.
{P}---Beard4�g-fHedse+ -Heme---Fester-@h4}dren---Restr4eted
te-a-€am4}p-dxe}}4ng-4n-wg4eh-eq4}dren-ant-of-the4r
ewn-homesr-age-s4xteen-{}64-pears-er-underr-er-4n-the
ease-ef-menta}-retardat4en-age-twenty-enz-{g};_er
underr-are-eared-far-twenty-fear-{g44-hears-a-dap-€er
a-per#ed-ef-th4rtp-{3B;-daps.---�qe-number-te-qe-eared
fer-4n-ene-{};_fester-eh4}d-beard4ng-{pease;-home
spa}}_net-exeeed-f4ve-{5}r-One}ud}ng-the-fester
fam4}p1s-ewn-eh4}dren.-
121 Day rare Facility (Non -licensed, Five (5) or Less
Persons, Includin the Family's Own Children
Residential Facility (Non -licensed, Five (5) or Less
Persons, Including the Family's Own Children), Day
Care Facility, Licensed (Ten 10 or Less Persons,
Including the Family's Own Children) Residential
Facility, Licensed (Six (6) or Less Persons, Including
the Family's Owii Children).
a. Persons which are employed oyed to meet county and
state licensing regulations shall be permitted on
the premises.
b. All cruntY and state regulations anu licens'
procedures have been adhered to. liq
{3}---Bap-Fare-Heme---Restr4eted-te-a-fam#}p-dwe}}}4ng-4n
wh4eq-fester-Barer-snpera4s4en-and-tra4n4ng-far
eh4}dren-ef-segeee-er-pre-sehse}-age-ant-e¢-the4r-ewn
heme-#s-prev4ded-dr4ng-part-ef-a-dap-{}ass-then
twenty-fear-{24;-heurs}-w4th-ee-evern4ght-aeeemmede-
t4ans-er-fae4}4t4es-and-eq4}dren-are-de}4aered-and
remeved-da4}p;--the-number-to-be-eared-far-4n-eae-{};
dap-Bare-genie-sha}}-net-exeeed-¢4ve-{5;_4ne}nd4ng-the
fam4}pls-ewn-eh4}drea:
(3) {4} Public Parks and Playgrounds.
m
Ordinance No. 355
Page Three
(4) E5+ Essential Services.
SECTION VI. Chapter 40.10, Subd. C(4)a is amended to read
as follows:
a. involves employees other than persons residing on the
premises, except as allowed under Section 40.10, Subd.
B(2) or Section 40.11, Subd. E(2)
SECTION VII. Chapter 40.11, Subd. E(2) is amende to read as
follows:
{g}--Bay-Eare--- 8renp-Nursery-prmv#ded-tbato
(2) A day care facility (non -licensed) serving six (6) or
more person, a residential facility (non -licensed)
serving six (6) or more persons, a day care facility,
licensed. and as defined under Mn. Statutes 245.782,
Subd. 5, serving eleven ill; or more persons or a
residential facility, licensed, and as defined under
Mn. Statutes 245.782, Subd. 6, serving seven (7) or
more persons provided that:
_ a--Ne-evern3ght-€ae3}�t#es-are-prev#sled-far-the
ehf-ldren-served.---ek4ldren-are-delivered-and
remeved-de4� U
a. b- The front yard depth shall he a minimum of thirty
(30) feet.
b. e. Not less than forty (40) square feet of outside
playspace per child shall be provided and that such
space be suitably fenced and/or screeuied in
accordance with conditions as may be specified by
the City Council.
C. d- Adequate off-street parking and access is provided
in compliance with Section 40.07 of the Code.
d. e. Adequate off-street loading and service entrances
are provided in compliance wiht Section 40.08 of
this Code.
e. €- The site and related parking and service shall be
served by an arterial or collector street of
sufficient capacity to accommodate the traffic
which wil be generated.
f. g: All signing and informational or visual communica-
tion devices shall be in compliance with the Mounds
View Sign Code (Chapter 39).
g_ h- The provision of Section 40.25, Subd. A(5) of this
Code are considered and satisfactorily met.
Ordinance No. 355
Page Four
h. All county and state regulations and licensing
procedures have been adhered to. persons which are
employed to meet county and state licensing
emulations shall be permitted to be on the
remises.
SECTION VIII. Chapter 40.12, Subd. B, is amended to read as
follows:
Subd. B The following are permitted uses in an R-3 District:
(1) All permitted uses allowed in an R-2 District.
(2) Multiple family dwelling structures containing
six (6) or less dwelling units.
(3) Boarding houses as defined in Section 40.02,
Subd. B (8) and (9) and limited to not more
than eight (8) persons.
{44--Beard#A9-{heuse;-home --- fester-ehildren-
Restrieted-te-ehildren-eet-e£-their-ewn
hemesT-ages-sixteen-{}6}-pears-er-nnderT-er
in-the-ease-ef-mental-retardation-age
twenty-one-{g}}-er-nnderT-are-eare-ter
twenty-£ear-{24;-peers-a-dap-fer-a-period-af
thirty-{3B;-daps---3:he-nember-te-be-eared-fer
in-enA-{l}-Fansn�_eilil a-- coertlin
g-thense;-home
shall-net-exeeed-€ive-{5}T-inelnd4ng-the
€ester-fam4lpls-ewn-ehi4dren7
{5}--Bap-eare-heme---Restr4eted-te-a-family
dwell4ng-4n-whieh-fester-eAw-7-supervi5ien-and
araininQ-fer-ehildren-ef-seheel-er-pre-sehee}
age-edt-ef-the-their-ewn-home-is-provided
daring-part-ef-a-day-{less-then-twenty-fear
{�4;-hems}-with-ne-overnight-aeeenunedetiens
er-faeilities-end-ehildren-are-delivered-and
removed-daily,--The-nn®ber-to-be-eare-fer-in
one-{}}-dap-eare-heme-shall-net-exeeed-five
{5;-inelud4ng-the-€amilpls-ewn-eh4}dren7
(4) {6; Public Parks and Playgrounds.
(5) {7} Essential Services.
This ordinance shall take effect thirty days after the date
of its publication. 0
Ordinance No. 355
Page Five
f�
Read by the Council of the City of Mounds View on the 7.3rd
day of January, 1984.
Read and passed by the Council of the City of Mounds View
this day of , 1984.
ATTEST:
(SEAL)
Mayor
Clerk -Administrator
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney
w
► '/
ORDINANCE NO. .356
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
SPATE OF MINNESOTA
AN ORDINANCE. ESTABLISHING CHAPTER 27 OF THE
MUNICIPAL CODE ENTITLED "SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND"
The Council of the City of Mounds View does hereby ordain:
27.01 Definitions
Subdivision 1. Capital improvement Projects. Projects which
are intended to acquire, construct, permanently modify or
purchase assets of a long term character which are intended to
continue to be held or used, such as land, buildings and
machinery.
Subdivision 2. Emergency. An emergency is an occurrence
where the public health, safety, and welfare is jeopardized,
where immediate action is necessary, and must be declared by a
4/5 vote of the entire Council.
Subdivision 3. Enterprise Fund. A fund established to
finance and account for the acquisition, operation, and
maintenance of govermental facilities which are entirely or
predominantly self-supporting by user charges. Examples of
enterprise funds are those for water, sewer, gas, and electric
utilities, swimming pools, airports, parking garages, and transit
systems.
Subdivision 4. Equipment. Tangible property of a more or
less permanent nature, other than land, buildings, or
improvements other than buildings, which is useful in carrying on
operations. Examples are machinery, trucks, cars, furniture, and
furnishings.
Subdivision 5. General Government Maintenance Ex enses.
Costs incurred for the upkeep o p ysical properties in
condition for uses or occupancy which are used in the rendering
of services traditionally associated with municipal government as
distinguished from those provided by municipal enterprise
operations.
Subdivision 6. General Government Operating Expenses. Costs
which are necessary to the rendering of services traditionally
associated with municipal government as distinguished from those
provided by municipal enterprise operations.
Subdivision 7. Public Im rovement Projects. Public
improvement projects as def ned in Chapter. 26 of the Code.
Subdivision 6. Special Assessment Fund. A fund set up to
finance and account for the construction of improvements or
provision of services which are to be paid for, wholly or in
part, from special assessments levied against benefitted
property.
27.02 Special Projects Fund Established: PURPOSE
Subdivision 1. There is hereby established and created a
separate and special fund designated as the Special Projects
Fund, which the Clerk -Administrator and Finance Director -
Treasurer shall maintain on the official accounting records and
financial statements of the City and administer in accordance
with this ordinance. This fund may be used to make interest
bearing loans to finance public improvement projects authorized
pursuant to Chapter 26 of the Code or to make interest bearing
loans to finance equipment purchases and/or capital improvement
projects, which have beer, included in the Long Term Financial
Plan, of any City enterprise fund.
Subdivision 2. This fund may also be used to make permanent
transfers for the purchase of equipment and/or to finance capital
improvement projects, which have been included in the Long Term
Financial Plan, of any City fund except special assessment and
enterprise funds. In no event shall this fund be used to finance
current and recurring general government operations and mainten-
ance expenses.
Subdivision 3. This fund may be used to make permanent
transfers to the fund balance of the General Fund to ensure that
there exists a cash flow reserve and a reserve for contingen-
cies. The amounts of said reserves shall be determined by the
City Council.
Subdivision 4. This fund may also be used to make emergency
repairs to the public utility system, City streets and highways,
municipal buildings, and machinery and equipment in the event
that monies for said repairs have not been previously budgeted
and/or that sufficient monies are not available for said repairs
from other sources. in the event that the emergency repairs
needed are to assets accounted for in the Water Fund, Sewer Fund,
or any City enterprise fund the monies for said repairs shall be
in the form of an interest bearing loan. At the option of the
Council monies used for repairs to assets accounted for in other
funds may be in the form of interest bearing loans or permanent
transfers. It shall be used for no other purpose and any monies
on deposit in the tund may be invested in accordance with
provisions of the City Charter and with applicable Minnesota
Statutes.
Subdivision 'S. This fund may also be used to pay the bond
service charges of the paying agents of the bonds which were
formerly accounted for in the Improvement Bond Redemption Fund
and which were defeased on January 18, 1984.
27.03 Funds To Be Deposited Therein
There shall be deposited in said fund the initial sum of
$ which represents the cash balance remaining in the
Improvement Bond Redemption Fund after the cash defeasance of
that fund's outstanding bonds. The special assessments
receivable of the Improvement Bond Redemption Fund shall be
transferred to said fund and hereafter all future payments of
principal and interest on those assessments shall be deposited in
the fund. There may also be deposited in said fund such other
monies as 41iay be directed h. Lhe Council.
s
r�
/-� 27.04 Use of Funds
Subdivision 1. Upon the adoption of a resolution by 4/5 of
the entire Council, monies of the fund may be used for the
purposes stated in Section II above, in the event of an interest
bearing loan the resolution authorizing said loan shall state the
amount of the loan, its purpose, term, interest rate, and method
of repayment.
Subdivision 2. In the event- of the purchase of equipment or
the financing of capital improvement projects, the authorizing
resolution shall state the amount of the purchase or financing,
shall contain a description of the equipment or project, and
shall designate the fund to which the monies are to be
transfered.
Subdivision 3. In the event of emergency repairs the
authorizing resolution shall state the nature of the repairs, the
amount needed for said repairs and shall designate the fund to
which the monies are to be transferred. The authorizing
resolution shall also state that monies for said emergency
repairs had not previously been budgeted and that sufficient
monies are not available from other sources to finance said
emergency repairs
Subdivision 4. In the event of a permanent transfer to the
fund balance of the General Fund the authorizing resolution shall
state the amount of the transfer and shall indicate whether said
transfer is designated for the cash flow reserve or the reserve
for contingencies.
27.05 Ammendment or Repeal
Upon the adoption of a resolution by 4/5 of the entire
Council this ordinance may be ammended or repealed. In the event
of repeal, monies accumulated in the Fund shall be deposited in
the General Fund.
Read by the Council of. the City of Mounds View on the 23rd
day of January, 1984.
Read and passed by the Council of the City of Mounds View
this day of , 1984.
ATTEST:
(SEAL)
Mayor
Clerk -Administrator
RESOLUTION NO. 1717
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING A TRANSFER OF FUNDS FROM THE
SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND TO THE GENERAL FUND
WHEREAS, the City's auditors have, in their management report
dated December 31, 1982, recommended that the city maintain an
adequate level of fund balance in the General Fund in order to
provide for the financial strength and integrity of the City; and
WHEREAS, the Council recognizes that an adequate level of
fund balance is necessary to provide for cash flow requirements and
emergency and/or unanticipated expenditures;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council that
$238,000.00 be transferred from the Special Projects Fund to the
fund balance of the General Fund and it is hereby designated for
cash flow reserves;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Council that $100,000.00 be
transferred from the Special Projects Fund to the fund balance of
the General Fund and it is hereby designated as a reserve for
contingencies;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Council that these transfers
are to be made after Ordinance 356, An Ordinance Establishing
Chapter 27 of the Municipal Code Entitled "Special Projects" is in
effect pursuant to provisions of the City Charter.
Adopted this
ATTEST:
(SEAL)
Clerk -Administrator
MEMO TO: Clerk -Administrator and City Council
rROM: Building Inspector
DATE: February 8, 1984
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR REFUND ON SEWER SERVICE INSTALLATION
AT 2581/83 COUNTY ROAD I
Staff has reviewed, researched and received estimates for
installations of sewer services similar to the above noted It
request. Attached is a previous memo regarding
this item.is staff's conclusion that the bill submitted is reasonable and
would be the average costs for such an undertaking. Therefore,
staff recommends payment of the bill as submitted. With your
additional approval, staff will submit, at a later date,specific
guidelines to be used in future cases.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the refund request
for sewer service at 2581/83 County Road I in the amount of
$1,401.00 to Roger H. Koopmeiners and to receive a report from
staff giving specific guidelines for future occurrences.
' SAR/bc
Attachment
MEMO TO: Clori:-Administrator
Mayor and City Council �1
FROM. Duildinq lnsptactor I`vl
DATE: January 1G, 1984
SUBJECT: REQUEST POR REFUND ON SEWER SERVICE INSTALLATION AT
25811181 CoUlITY ROAD I
Attached is a request for payment of a sewer service installation
from Mr. Roger U. Koopmeiners, builder and owner of the two-family
dwelling at 2581/83 County Road I. City as-builts indicated that
a sewer service was available for the lot at the above address but
at the time of the sewer installation the service could not be
found. Either the service was never installed or the location was
drastically off as given in the as-builts. Since a service could
not be found the contractor then had to dig down to the main and
tap for the service. City records indicate that the lot was
originally assessed $295.21 for a sewer service lateral. Attached
with the request for payment are invoices from the sewer and water
contractor and the paying contractor for work involved in the
installation of the sewer service which totaled $1,401.00.
The history of such requests is very limited due to difficulties
in finding any. Only one could be found dating back to 1981.
In that case a water service had been assessed for but was unable
to be found. The Council then ordered the installation at a cost
of $675.00, with the work being done by the private contractor.
The original assessed cost for the service was $106.00.
The following are the optionS staff would offer:
1. The City could refund the assessed cost of the service, plus
interest from the date of the actual assessment.
2. Establish a maximum limit, i.e., today's average assessed
cost for service installations.
3. Authorize payment of the bills as submitted.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff would recommend options 1 or 2 in t9at order.
Although there exists one case in the past regarding this type of
an occurrence, it would be in the City's best interest to establish
or know the maximum liability in these types of occurrences. Again,
this matter has been discussed with the City Attorney and he concurs
with this recommendation. Staff will await Council direction in
this matter.
�. SAR/pf
Attachments
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA SESSION
February 21, 1984
7:00 p.m.
1. Discussion of 1984 Queen Pageant with Claudia Korsun.
2. Three month performance review of Police Chief Ramacher.
3. Consideration of memorandum from Police Chief Ramacher
requesting authorization to attend training seminar.
4. Consideration of staff memorandum regarding Teamsters Local
No. 320 (Police) Contract negotiations.
5. Review of Draft Street Maintenance Study with John Johnson.
6. Consideration of staff memorandum regarding Public Works
request for purchase of fire hose.
7. Consideration of staff memorandum regarding Minnesota Housing
Finance Agency Solar Bond Deferred Loan Program.
8. Consideration of staff memorandum regarding close-out of the
Babinski Proposal file.
9. Consideration of staff memorandum regarding refunding of
planning application fees for Gary Kr.ig.
10. Consideration of staff memorandum regarding Tree City USA
Award.
11. Consideration of staff memorandum regarding establishing a
date for the Honeywell presentation.
12. Consideration of staff memorandum regarding Ramsey County
Municipal Court Consolidation and Resolution No. 1718.
13. Consideration of staff memorandum regarding comprehensive
rezonings.
14. Consideration of Proclamation and Resolution of commendation
to Jerry Pomerleau.
15. Consideration of staff memorandum regarding refund of
Mezzenga security deposit.
16. Consideration of staff memorandum regarding request for
adjustment of sewer bill from Chemclean Truck Wash.
17. Discussion of personnel modifications to Public Works/
Community Development Department as a result of staff
resignations.
(I
TO: MAYOR, CITY COUNCIL, AND CLERK-AD141HISTRATOR
FROM: CHIEF OF POLICE
DATE: February 14, 1984
RE: TRAINING COURSE ON POLICE MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATION
1984
of attending an outstate training course.
1 would like to discuss with the City Council at the February ,
agenda meeting the feasibility
I have enclosed a copy of the course contents for your review, also I
am enclosing an estimate of the cost.
of aII nd
rcent
,+ niirations. The problems Ofthc"snmp"policeorshcrirrss
currntntaaN personnel rit>oftheset;ecncic,rmpI%I sthatIIopall ct,olwel.WhileIthesenunshersaresignificantthelneed%of11ow:Feneiesafor
ago 1
the most part have been mrrlanke,l Iq guclIc and prisarc IT 1.11 +'are a..isted by, large sratls. This program surfaces both the.
department are nonetheless annples and the imhliduel uran;Icen;il ,kilo ui iba.c who admuuavmtion`ofb'smalhencies nlax enforcement
apart from their counterpwp in large ats•n;ics xhn, for the most pwt
unique and general admiui,tralise and ul:wagclial skills which arc neressa0' ro the ef(cctivc op
agencies.
TRAINING 014ECTIVE4:
• lb identify the wle and contingent demands of
the
chief executive in a small law enforcement agencydepartment's blidget;
,
ing
e resilicti
• To assist thcicbief cxc needsative iand
Ifilling planning andtbudgednglreguirmements without ive t planning and budgeti mg staff'.
• To assist ;he chief executive in developing viable policy, Promdure, rules, and regulations;
• To guide the administrator toward effective recruiting, testing,
elect career develcpmenl, and promotion;
• To develop a capability for measuring and improving Po
• To unfold the issues of vicarious liability, identify incidents which tend to generate suits and develop strategics for prorating the
executive and the department.
Uut
1:uclm 26.30, 1914
A,
Tuition
Locations Member _ AT
. all
n Anionic• Texas -RF 1eo'bd 425
Chnriceron, Sow 1 'nrnlina
$425.
CQSTS: tutit4on-------- 424,
air fair --------
hotel A 350.
accommodations-- 149. TOTAL
r
L
` tav-. _ G
MEI40 TO: Mayor and City Council q
FROM: Clerk -Administrator.
DATE: January 23, 1984
SUBJECT: PUBLIC WORKS REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF FIRE POSE
Attached to this memorandum please find a memorandum from Public
Works Foreman Gary Kardell requesting authorization for the
purchase of 300 feet of 2-1/2 inch fire Dose at a total cost of
$588.00. Mr. Kardell indicates that the reason for the request
is to provide a fire hose that would enable the City to bypass
a watermain break when we are unable to isolate it through the
use of valves. This would allow the City to provide water
service to the majority of residents that would otherwise be
without water.
In discussing the situation with Mr. Kardell, he advised me that
the fire hose presently in stock in the Public Works Garage has
been used for a variety of purposes, including the pumpage of
sewage, and would not be acceptable for the purposes intended.
He has assured me that should the City authorize the purchase of
this hose he will secure it in a manner that will guarantee that
it remains sanitary for the purposes for which it is intended.
Finance Director Brager has advised that there are Contingency
monies within the Water Department Fund 1984 Budget which could
be used for the purchase of this hose.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff would recommend Council authorize the
transfer— er of Contingency monies in the Water Fund to Account
No. 700-121-4123 in the amount of $588.00 for the purchase of
300 feet of 2-1/2 inch fire hose.
DFP/pf
Attachment
r
tti
,� 7
MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Clerk -Ad minisl:rato
DATE: January 18, 1984
SUBJECT: MINNESOTA HOUSING FINANCE AGIiNCY SOLAR BANK DEFERRED
LOAN PROGRAM
Attached please find Resolution No. 1706 authorizing the Metropo-
litan Council to implement the Solar Bank Deferred Loan Program
offered by the Minnesota (lousing Finance Agency. Homeowners in
the City of Mounds View will be able to participate in this
deferred loan program only if the attached resolution is adopted,
giving authorization to the Metropolitan Council to implement the
program. Also attached to this letter is a copy of the corres-
pondence received from the Metropolitan Council on this program.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff would recommen
No. 1706 authorizing the Metropolitan
Solar Bank Deferred Loan Program.
DFP/pf
Attachments
d
adoption of Resolution
Council to implement the
THE
PRECEDING
DOCUMENT(S)
HAVE
BEEN
REFILMED
FOR
LEGIBILITY
3
MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Clerk-Administrator
��
DATE: January 23, 1984
SUBJECT: PUBLIC WORKS REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF FIRE HOSE
Attached to this memorandum please find a memorandum from Public
Works Foreman Gary Kardell requesting authorization for the
purchase of 300 feet of 2-1/2 inch fire hose at a total cost of
$588.00. Mr. Kardell indicates that the reason for the request
is to provide a fire hose that would enable the City to bypass
a watermain break when we are unable to isolate it through the
use of valves. This would allow the City to provide water
service to the majority of residents that would otherwise be
without water.
In discussing the situation with Mr. Kardell, he advised me that
the fire hose presently in stock in the Public Works Garage has
been used for a variety of purposes, including the pumpage of
sewage, and would not be acceptable for the purposes intended.
He has assured me that should the City authorize the purchase of
this hose he will secure it in a manner that will guarantee that
it remains sanitary for the purposes for which it is intended.
Finance Director Brager has advised that there are Contingency
monies within the Water Department Fund 1984 Budget which could
be used for the purchase of this hose.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff would recommend Council authorize the
transfer of Contingency monies in the Water Fund to Account
No. 700-121-4123 in the amount• of $588.00 for the purchase of
300 feet of 2-1/2 inch fire hose.
DFP/pf
Attachment
!''I;U;'!: 1Ub1 6- ,,,,i r::, Puroman
DATE': January 11, 1.984
M)BJ1a"I': I'!ii:i'lli::a; W Plitt: Ilu;:I:
1 am rc,w:::t.irnt ::;:=i::f,auc in ubl.a.ininq funds for the purchase
of 300 fceL tit: :!; inch fire honc. The cost is $90,00 per 50
feet of hose. Total cost would be $580.00. The reason for
this request is because of an incident that took, place on
January 15, 1904. 11c, e:•:pericnced awater main break which
required us to eliminate water service to a number of homes on
Knoll Drive and !!.i.livi.ew Road. We could have possibly made a
jumper from one hydrant to nnollior giving these people water
service, however, 1 dial not feel that the canvas hose we had
leas s;unary though to be used for that purpose. Therefore,
T all, requesC.in, to purchase 300 fact of 21� inch fire hose to
be kept s„L ly fur the purpose of using as a hydrant jumper in
cmcrgcncy s.i.UM! i„ns and will not be used for any other purpose
so is to keep the hose sanitary. Our department presently does
not have. funds :v;:i! blc for this purchase or any budgeted, and
1 rnn thar0P1u"0 ;isL'iu.1 your assistance in this matter.
Thank you.
GK/bc
C
C
MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Clark-Adminirtrato
DATE: January 18, 1984
SUBJECT: MINNESOTA HOUSING FINANCE•' AGE14CY SOLAR BANK DEFERRED
LOAN PROGRAM
Attached please find Resolution No. 1706 authorizing the Metropo-
litan Council to implement the Solar Bank Deferred Loan Program
offered by the Minnesota (lousing Finance Agency. Homeowners in
the City of Mounds View will be able to participate in this
deferred loan program only if the attached resolution is adopted,
giving authorization to the Metropolitan Council to implement the
program. Also attached to this letter is a copy of the cTrorram.
pondence received from the Metropolitan Council on this p 9
RECOMMENDATION: Staff w
No. 1706 authorizing the
Solar Bank Deferred Loan
DFP/pf
Attachments
,uld recommend adoption of Resolution
Metropolitan Council to implement the
Program.
RESOLUTION NO. 1706
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL
TO IMPLEMENT THE SOLAR BANK DEFERRED LOA14 PROGRAM
WITHIN THE CITY OF 14OUNDS VIEW
WHEREAS, the City of Mounds View desires to assist families
and individuals in making energy improvements for the purpose of
increasing the energy efficiency of their homes; and
WHEREAS, the Minnesota 11ousing Finance Agency has funds to
be used for such purposes, and will contract with the Metropolitan
Council to administer these Solar Bank Deferred Loan Funds; and
WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Council has been designated a
housing and redevelopment authority pursuant to Minnesota Statutes
Section 473.195 with the powers and duties of a housing and
redevelopment authority under the provisions of the Minnesota
Housing and Redevelopment Authority Act; and
WHEREAS, under the provisions of Minnesota Statutes Section
473.195, the Metropolitan Council must obtain the approval of the
governing body of any municipality in which it proposes to implement
the Solar Bank Deferred Loan Program.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Aiounds View
hereby authorizes the Metropolitan Council to implement the Solar
Bank Deferred Loan Program for the purpose of increasing the energy
efficiency of homes in the City of Mounds View, and that the Clerk
Administrator is hereby authorized to enter into any necessary
agreement with the Metropolitan Council for operating the program
within the City.
Adopted this 23rd day of January, 1984.
ATTEST: mayor
(SEAL) Clerk -Administrator
W
(MN
N V 0 Metropolitan Council
300 Metro Square Building
0 Seventh and Robert Streets
w' St. Paul, Minnesota 55101
Telephone 1612)291.6359
''k'rn rnrr'
January 13, 1954
'I'll • Local 0ff:.eiais in Ramsey County
Sab,joct: 114inrenota Housing Finance Apen^-y
Sal:.l: Sank L••cc-rred Local PruZrata
i'iliF:l has developed u p-Logram to p.ovide deferred loans for energy
iAm_cvemants to owners who are otherwise unable to qualify for
firancior; to increase the energy efficiency of their homes,
iletro H-1k will be the adnlini.steri:lg agency for this program in
cooperation wi.tn those comet nlit i.es whc authorize Metro HIG1 to
n:1d-nrtake *.he program in thai.r ciry. Since your community is
participating with Metro lillk in r''e Mi1FA Rehabilitation Loan
Program, we wuu;d encourage your participation in providing
itvmeuwners an uppurtuhit•y for the deferred energy loan, which
the Solar 3aak D;4erred Loan Program can. offer.
,;,:..Loved i.s e, prcgram summary of tho Solo. 'bank Deferred Loan
I-'run:aln for yc-ur i.nforhnatioll. 'Piie tot-alamoutht of funds for
Ramsey Counzy is $P0,000.
if you would like to offer this program in your community,
picase IhavL' the attached rcculution approved by the Cii:y Council
an,3 rerurned to Pietro HP,n. This pro -;ram can be offered to home-
owner~ after the City Cuuncil approvcs the resolution.
If you have any quesLlons regarding this program, nlevse call me
at 2911-iliA. Thank you for your cooperation and we lnrk forward
to working with this new program in your community.
R.os4,m;rV ram ilius
Mc:trr. 'RA P.6tab Supervisor
RFJeh
Eno Losures
An Equal Oppollanily Employer
V
SOLAR PANE: i I"FURED 1.0`N 1'0004AM
Program De_cription:
The Solar Bank. Deferred Loan Program provides financing for
energy improvements to homeownarn who otherwise would be unable
to increase the energy efficiency of the home. Assistance is in
the form of a deferred loan which need not be repaid unless the
borrower sells, transfers, or conveys the property, or ceases to
live in the property, either voluntarily or involuntarily, within
10 years after the date of the loan.
Eligibility Criteria:
In order to receive assistance through this program, the following
criteria must be met:
1.) The applicant must own the property to be improved, either
through at least a one-third interest in the fee title or
as purchaser of a contract -for -deed, or as a recipient of
a life estate, and must reside in the property.
2.) The property to be improved can contain no more than four
dwelling units.
3.) The applicant is a current heating customer of NSP or
Minnegasco.
il.) An RCS audit must show that energy improvements to the
property are necessary.
5.) The applicant must have been prohibited from obtaining
assistance for the required improvements as a result
of at least one of the following:
a.) The applicant was ineligible for a loan from a
financial institution based on one of the
following reasons:
- Applicant has a poor credit history;
- The applicant'c ability to repay the loan
did not meet MBFA's Home Improvement Loan
Program underwriting standards;
- The property to be improved was being purchased
through a contract -for -deed with a balloon pay-
ment due prior to the maturity date of the
improvement loan;
- The property to be improved was being purchased
on a contract -for -deed and the contract vendors
would not enter into a mortgage.
b.) The applicant was denied assistance from MHFA, Weath-
erization, or Community Development programs because
of inability to meet program guidelines.
c.) The amount of assistancc for which the .applicant was
eligible under other available programs was not adequate
to meet the energy conservation needs and other rehab-
ilitation needs of the :structure.
Improvement Eligibility:
All improvements, as specified by the proposed ruler, and by an RCS
audit, shall be eligible. Priority will be given to those improvements
which rate highest in the RCS cost-effectiveness test.
Improvement Amounts:
The amount of assistance available to each household cannot exceed $5.000.
Security Agreements:
All loans will be deferred loans that will be secured by a Repayment
Agreement and Lien (Repayment Agreement) filed against the property. In
cases of a Contract -for -Deed where the contract vendor refuses to sign a
Repayment Agreement, efforts will be made to file the Repayment Agreement
without the signature of the vendor. Such agreements may take the form of
a "fixture filing". "Fixture filing" language may be able to be incorpo-
rated in the Repayment Agreement form.
Gross Income Limits:
Household Size
Income Limit
1
$
33,187.00
2
$
37,875.00
3
$
42,656.00
4
$
'172417.00
5
$
50,3113.00
6
$
53,343.00
7
$
56,250.00
8
$
59,250.00
Participating Communities:
All Ramsey County communities are eligible to participate except for the
City of St. Paul.
Metro HRA Contact Person: Eleanor Heiser, 291-6573•
9
CMEMO TO: Clerk -Administrator and City Council.
FROM; Engineering/Planning Technician
DATE: February 2, 1984 J
SUBJECT: BABINSKI PROPOSAL
Staff requests Council approval to close out inactive planning
application files and refund unexpended non -base application
fees. The BaL•inski subdivision/rezoning proposal has been
inactive for approximately three months. Staff has not been
contacted by either the developer or his representatives in order
to continue with the proposal. lie have asked for authorization
from the developer for the professional planner (Northwest
Associated Consultants) to commence with his study per Planning
Commission and Council direction. This authorization has never
been given.
STAFF RECOWIENDATION: Adopt Itesolution No. 1711 refunding
unused planning appl.ieati.ons for Leonard Uahinski.
fee
FJK/bc
RESOLUTION NO. 1711
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RN1SEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION REFUNDING REFUNDABLE PLANNING APPLICATION
FEES FOR PLANNING CASE 128-83, LEONARD BABINSKI
WHEREAS, Mr. Leonard Babinski requested major subdivision
and rezoning approval for the property located between Edgewood
Drive and Greenfield Avenue north of Bronson Drive; and
WHEREAS, approximately 3 months have elapsed since Mr.
Babinski's last correspondence with the City regarding his
development; and
WHEREAS, the City desires to close planning files on all
inactive planning applications; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Babinski has submitted $1,100.00 in refund-
able fees, of which $767.92 have not been expended;
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View City
Council authorizes the refund of the additional fees not spent
in the amount of $767.92 and authorizes the closing of this
planning application file.
ATTEST:
(SEAL)
Adopted this 27th day of February, 1984.
MAYOR
Clerk -Administrator
&-,,L.. �
MEMO T0: Clcrk-Administrator and City Council
FROM: Engineering/Planning Technician. rir
DATE: February 2, 1984
SUBJECT: REFUND OF PLANNING APPLICATION PEES
Gary Krig, recent subdivider of property located at 8224 Long
Lake Road, has requested a refund of the unused portion of his
planning application fees. Staff time used in the preparation
and review/discussion did not e::ceed the rase fee of $75.00
submitted with this proposal.At the time of application, an
additional $80.00 was collected for reapportioning assessments
and $50.00 for staff/consultant reviews. No reapportioning of
assessments was required (the assessments had been paid) and
the $50.00 staff/consultant review fee was not needed. A $130.00
refund is being requested at this time.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
the unused portion of
Gary Krig.
C ,
FJK/bc
Adopt Resolution No. 1712 which refunds
the planning application fees submitted by
d
RESOLUTION NO. 1712
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW '
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION REFUNDING REFUNDABLE PLANNING APPLICATION
FEES FOR PLANNING CASE 119-82, GARY KRIG
WHEREAS, Mr. Gary Krig applied to the City for a minor
subdivision of property located at 8224 Long Lake Road; and
WHEREAS, $205.00 in fees were submitted at the time of
application which included a $75.00 non-refundable fee for the
minor subdivision, $80.00 for reapportionment fee and $50.00
for staff and consultant reviews; and
WHEREAS, no reapportionment of assessments was required
and the $75.00 non-refundable minor subdivision fee covered
staff review/discussion and preparation of reports pertaining to
this application; and
WHEREAS, it is the City's policy to refund unused portions
of refundable planning application fees;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View City
Council authorizes the refund of $130.00 to Gary Krig for
additional planning application fees not expended.
ATTEST:
(SEAL)
Adopted this 27th day of February, 1984.
Mayor
Mayor
4
MEMO TO: Mounds View City Council Yk ! 0
w FROM: Bruce K. Anderson, Di ector
1( ` Parks, Recreation and F tr
DATE: February 16, 1984
RE: Tree City U.S.A. Award
Staff is pleased, once again, to inform the City Council that
Mounds View has been awarded the Tree City U.S.A. Award for
1983. Tree City U.S.A. is a national award presented by the
Arbor Day Foundation and there are four criteria that the City is
required to meet before becoming eligible. We are extremely
pleased to be honored once again in 1983 and a great deal of the
credit for the City's receipt of this should be credited to City
Forester Wriskey.
Having had the opportunity to attend the presentation at the
State Capitol building in 1983, I would like to request that a
representative from the City Council represent the City this year
as I feel it is much more appropriate.
Staff will be forwarding additional information as it is received
to keep the Council apprised on this issue and hopefully a
Councilmember will be able to represent the City on Arbor Day in
1984.
Should you have any questions regarding receipt of this award,
feel free to contact myself directly at 784-3055, ext. #41.
BKA/sll
HONORARY TRUSTEES
T1IWARI L'DAIL
fh,,~
Ia.ur SN,n,N d Inw,w
t "Al N iRSDN
US
ran, "n , ch.l
IODII AL1IRI
lnx.nwi
TONN C ASIIION
Yx,rmxMl
l WlinlNn NnrIIVm IJArutl
RNIN C RANSII
Ir. w,w vHe rmxkN
jiwfl tl Me,x,n IpnMn
ALAN elA1%
Imwn Mw.
140.1 I1 W a cxm
ODUGtAS euunu
us Cory`~
DICK CAVIT7
In„Mw.
10 CDr1
RMind CNNI US Ianl SrNx,
ILRI CUNNINCHW
C w. WwW A.InA
(a W. ORx, a
INam,nal. US 1a Srax,
WS IUCINI A 04MDDN
cr,n{{Nn0i1YRKIl, N
I y,rl1ry Maral
I IWIS DON
us s,NNnr
ROHN LUNINIR
I.,ww. DI.,a
U.I CwNma of Ni ry
,AOY BIRD IOHNSON
Sar.dl. 11W
Rollo KIIRIY
Lamm, SuN tl Noti
WS THOMASC LAW
N.IaN1 CawxllAa
Suer Cwde, O,. IN
1101111 IDIRMAN
NI rOml II
IACR,ORIN?
I.~Dh a
UMI W61W tin,
Rill IUCAS
lanes
GORDON M JAI
lnNrulnn
I MI:HAIL WCtOSK1Y
Iwo," Dana
S+.. CIA
WKINI I" 11WI MORIISON
Cwla,n,a. Nlmvl
A.Id, C.mvw.
IAWSC 000O
rm I. Unlwn., a
W'.. S, l
1100110A RIHIK
.nwH VKI P.Wd
In Klo Ia kw.W UIWD TOONIY
fs" k 1uH11N'"
Ales tl A ,
IOARD Of TRUSTEES
DR WICHIIC IIRRII,
The National Arbor Day Foundation
100 Arbor Avenue, Nebraska City, Nebraska 68410
BOHN ROSINOW
Ii"ove D.pm,
February 1, 1984 Emullrr Oertn:
Sun, 501, 711 N 1716
LINOK Nrb,446 6806
11071171-S655
The Honorable Duane W. McCarty
Mayor of the City of Mounds View
2401 Highway 10
Mounds View, MN 55112
Dear Mayor McCarty:
Congratulations to the City of Mounds View on again being
named as a Tree City USA for your work in 19831
Trees provide many ongoing practical and spiritual benefits,
and tree -care efforts must be ongoing as well. As you know,
properly planted and maintained trees can lower heating and
coolings bills, reduce wind and water erosion, and make
concrete -clad cities green and pleasant places in which to
live. The beauty of trees is a constant source of joy for
everyone who lives near them. You are to be commended for
the commitment you have made to maintaining this valuable
community resource.
The National Arbor Day Foundation is very pleased that you
are making this vital continuing effort, and we are equally
pleased to rcnc•.- your Tree City USA designation.
State Foresters are responsible for the presentation of the
Tree City USA flag and other recognition material. The
Foundation will forward your awards to Meg Hanisch in your
State Forester's office. They will be coordinating the
presentation with you. It would be especially appropriate
to make the Tree City USA award a part of your Arbor Day
ceremonies.
Again, congratulations on receiving this national recognition
for your tree -care program.
Iu.10NY
DR RauTimNOSION Best rega ,
vn l Y
CHARCIICNACI
I~ Lawn
Bill
DAII Bill 5�k a��
MNAIDI CALVIN CAISTIN
PM LIUSCHIN John Rosenow
IDIPi lull. K
JUMN MACRIST Executive Director
W s MAIM Woods
DR IAmmUr,ofli JR/ksl
R CAA Alaa,w A 11II, Iwr.+n
ADVISORY COMMITTEE Enclosure
DDIOINI RIIR
CANI W col
S1lNIN IION cc: Richard Fr Wriskey
CIO aiMo " Meg Hanisch
1OMILOSINOW
,w
Ir uv of lines
* ;It L, //
MEMO TO: Mounds View City Council
FROM: Bruce K. Anderson, t
Parks, Recreation a F f s .y
DATE: February 16, 1984
RE: Honeywell Donation
As you are aware, staff has been working with the Public Affairs
Department of Honeywell, Inc, on a grant donation to the City
Parks Department. Mr. Jon Pekel, Manager of the Public Affairs
Division has formally notified staff that we will be receiving a
minimum $2,000 grant from Honeywell to be utilized in our
Neighborhood Park Development fund. Mr. Pekel and a
representative from Honeywell would like to formally present it
to the City Council at the February 27, 1984 City Council
meeting.
In addition to the formal presentation by Honeywell, staff will
be reviewing a final copy of the neighborhood park development
guidelines of which I have included a rough draft for your re—
view. The Parks and Recreation Commission has been developing
these guidelines over the past three months and will be formally
reviewing them at their February 23 Park Commission meeting.
Any questions you might have regarding the grant from Honeywell
or the Neighborhood Park Guidelines should be forwarded to either
one of the Parks and Recreaton Commissioners or staff prior to
the February 231 Park Commission meeting.
Please let me know if the presentation will be a problem on the
February 27th meeting so that some alternate arrangements can be
made.
BKA/sll
Attachment
NEIGHBORHOOD PARK PLANNING FUND GUTI)ELINF.S
PURPOSE
The purpose of the neighborhood park development and planning
?0"`N fund is to encourage, prrnnote and assist local residents, neigh-
borhood organizations, and civic groups in the establishment and
development of local park projects from a both financial and in -
kind labor perspective.
OBJECTIVES
1. To establish, develop and create other neighborhood park
planning councils using the Groveland Park Foundation as a
model.
2. The neighborhood park planning fund will not expend more than
50% of the available monies on an annual basis in each of
the three established and separate accounts.
3. There will be three separate accounts established for dissem-
inating neighborhood park planning funds:
a. Initial or seed money account will consist of 15% of the
total fund. This account will be utilized for developing
new neighborhood park planning councils and first time
projects proposed by local neighborhood residents, organ-
izations and/or civic groups. The grant monies from this
account need only be matched by an equivalent of inkind
labor from the sponsoring group.
b. Short term projects. The short term project fund will
not exceed 00% of the total fund balance at any time.
Short term projects are those projects defined as those
having a budgeted dollar amount of less that $5,000 and
will be completed within a one year period. All short
term projects are required to be matched by an equal
amount of funds from the sponsoring agency or group.
c. Long term project. This account will not exceed 25% of
the neighborhood park planning fund and will consist of
projects exceeding a $5,000 budgeted amount. The project
should be planned with a minimum of one year involvement
by the proposed group or organization and needs to be
matched on a 501 cash basis and 50% inkind labor and/or
materials.
GUIDELINES
1. The neighborhood park planning fund project requests will be
reviewed on an individual Droiect basis and applications may
be submitted to the Parks and Recreation Commission
throughout the year.. All applications must be submitted on
the official application form and be received at least one
week prior to the regularly scheduled Parks and Recreation
Commission meeting for review at their following meeting.
2. The neighborhood park planning fund monies are available for
all neighborhood parks within this system excluding Silver
View Community Park and the two school park locations, Edge -
wood and Pinewood Elementary School.
-z-
3. All applications will be initially reviewed by the Parks and
Recreation Commission who inturn will forward their final re-
commendation to the City Council for final and formal ap-
proval.
4. All proposed neighborhood park improvement projects must com-
ply with the City's parks and open space plan as adopted by
the Parks and Recreation Commission and City Council.
5. No neighborhood park planning funds may be used for funding
labor or staffing positions, such as a building supervisor,
or activity coordinator.; as all funds must be used for capi-
tal expenditures of a permanent nature.
6. Promotion of the neighborhood park planning and development
fund will be through the City Newsletter and all other media
means available to the City staff and the Parks and Recrea-
tion Commission.
7. It is the goal of the park planning and development fund to
become self-sustaining, with all future projects to be funded
from interest derived from the principal. The initial goal
for the park planning and development fund has been set a
$50,000.
A MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council
( FROM: Clerk -Administrator \
�J
DATE: February 8, 1984
SUBJECT: RAMSEY COUNTY MUNICIPAI, COURT CONSOLIDATION
Attached please find a letter from the Ramsey County League of
Local Governments, dated January 25, 1984, updating the City of
Mounds View on recent actions taken by Ramsey County towards
the consolidation of the Ramsey County municipal court system.
As indicated in this letter, Ramsey County staff has recently
completed a report entitled, "Ramsey County Suburban Municipal
Court Consolidation: A Preliminary Cost -Effectiveness Study".
A copy of this report is attached to this memorandum.
As a result of this report the Public Safety and Justice
Committee of the Ramsey County Board of Commissioners instructed
the County's Executive Director to conduct a study of the County's
space needs for the court system in terms of a suburban multi -service
center as part of a comprehensive capital improvement plan.
In their letter, the League encourages member cities to adopt
position statements for submission to the County on the matter
of municipal court consolidation. Attached please find
Resolution No. 1718 prepared by staff, encouraging a cooperative
effort in the planning of Ramsey County municipal court consoli-
dation. Staff has developed this resolution on the basis that
we feel that the consolidation of a municipal court system is
nearly inevitable even though present statutes prohibit such
consolidation without the approval of the suburban cities having
court locations within their communities. Rather than continuing
to fight the issue, staff is suggesting that the City recognize
its inevitability and encourage the County to allow suburban
municipalities to participate in the planning for such a consoli-
dation effort to ensure that the interests of both the cities and
the County are served by the consolidation of the municipal court
system. This would particularly be the case should the County
determine that they wish to establish a multi -service center or
centers whereby residents of the County's suburbs would be able
to obtain County services presently only being provided out of the
County courthouse in downtown St. Paul.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff would recommend Council adoption of
R^.SplUt10.^. No. 1718 Lr.^_ouraging a Cooperative Effort in Ramsey County
Municipal Court Consolidation Planning and the lobbying of our
County Commissioner, Robert Orth, to allow for the participation of
the suburbs in the planning of municipal court consolidation to
serve the interests of all parties.
DFP/pf
Attachments
RESOLUTION NO. 1718
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION ENCOURAGING A COOPERATIVE EFFORT IN RAMSEY
COUNTY MUNICIPAL COURT CONSOLIDATION PLANNING
WHEREAS, since the establishment of the Ramsey County Muni-
cipal Court System in 1975, considerable discussion has taken place
regarding the organization of the system; and
WHEREAS, since 1981 this discussion has resulted in the
development of several proposals to consolidate the existing six
court locations in studies by both the County and the Ramsey
County League of Local Governments; and
WHEREAS, a recent study completed by Ramsey County staff
entitled, "Ramsey County Suburban Municipal Court Consolidation:
A Preliminary Cost -Effectiveness Study", dated January 5, 1984,
has renewed discussion on this subject; and
WHEREAS, as a result of this most recent study the Public
Safety and Justice Committee of the Ramsey County Board of
I Commissioners has directed the County's Executive Director to
conduct a study of the court system's space needs as part of a
suburban multi -service center; and
WHEREAS, the City of Mounds View recognizes this most
recent action as a turning point on this issue with municipal
court consolidation being considered as part of an overall effort
to bring County services to the suburbs; and
WHEREAS, this new study places the issue of court consoli-
dation in a different light and the results of this study has the
potential for greater impact upon the suburbs than consolidation
alone; and
WHEREAS, the suburbs have a vested interest in this new
direction both from the standpoint of court consolidation and
increased County services; and
I
WHEREAS, the Mounds View City Council feels that such
new direction should be part of a cooperative effort of the County
and suburbs to deal with the issue of the provision of County
services in the suburbs.
RESOLUTION NO. 1718
Page Two
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Mounds View encourages the Ramsey County Board of
Commissioners to appoint a committee made up of representatives
of the County and suburbs to develop a plan for County Service
Center(s) in the suburbs which would include the consolidation
of current municipal court locations.
Adopted this 27th day of February, 1984.
ATTEST: _
Mayor
(SEAL)
Clerk -Administrator
j
'T
19 1
COUNTY LEAGUE {�Illl,lt,lll:,,,•II,I,.r.I.t
OF LOCAL GOVERNMENTS v. r.11li ��lllt„,iila ;;ill\
CAPITOL COUNTY January 25, 1984
OF MINNESOTA
Mr. Don Pauley
Arden Hills Mr.
Manager
Gem Lake 2401 Northeast Highway 10
Little Canada Mounds View, MN 55112
Maplewood
Mounds Vkry Dear Mr. Pauley:
New arighioo The Ramsey County League of Local Governments encourages its members
North oaLa
to formulate positions on the issue of Ramsey County Municipal Court
Consolidation and to state these positions in a resolution or letter
N. St. Paul to the Ramsey County Board of County Commissioners. The Board has not
made any final decision on this issue so it is important that communities
Ramsey County make their positions known to the commissioners now. Please send a copy
Aosevllle of any action you take to RCLLG so we can keep track of our members'
St. Paul views on this issue.
Shoreview I have enclosed two reports recently written on the issue, one by a study
Vadnais Heights
committee appointed by RCLLG and the other by Monty Martin, a Ramsey
County staff person. Mr. Martin's report was the focus of the January
White Bear Lake 18th RCLLG meeting. Speakers were Mr. Martin, Ramsey County Commissioner
White Bear Ruby Hunt and Mayor June Demos of Roseville. Many representatives from
Township suburban communities expressed concerns at that meeting about any possible
court consolidation. Some stated that they thought that cities would
have increased costs for police and prosecution expenses. There was
also a discussion on a possible plan whereby the county would establish
one or two suburban service centers which would house the courts plus
^.char ce:nty programs. Both county commissioners present, Ruby Hunt
and Don Salverda, suggested that communities and individuals concerned
about this issue, contact the Board with their views.
The Public Safety and Justice Committee of the Ramsey County Board of
Commissioners discussed Mr. Martin's report at a January 23rd meeting.
Page 2
Ramsey County League of Local Governments
The Comnittee, Ruby Hunt, Warren Schaber, and John Finley, directed the Executive
Director, Richard Brubacher, to conduct a study of the county's space needs for
the court system in terms of a suburban multi -service center as part of a comprehensive
capital improvement plan.
If your community is concerned about this issue, please let the Board of County
Commissioners know what your position is. Please contact me if you have any
questions about this.
Sincerely,
Ellen A. Longfellow
RCLLG Coordinator
EAL:mjk
enc.
j
i-3
MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Engineering/Planning Technician
DATE: February 16, 1984
SUBJECT: COMPREHENSIVE RFZONINGS
The Planning Commission recently completed a major review of the
Zoning Code (Chapter 40) text in addition to a complete review of the
zoning classifications of all parcels within Mounds View. Part one of
this process, the review of the Zoning Code text, has been completed
with the revised Chapter 40 becoming effective on February 11, 1984.
Staff is introducing to the Council at this time Part two of the
review, relating to the rezonings of particular parcels within the
City.
A review of parcel zonings was necessary because of numerous
inconsistancies between the zonings, the Comprehensive Plan
designation and the use which actually existed on a number of parcels
within the City. Both staff and the Planning Commission were having a
difficult time recommending a particular use for a particular piece of
property because of these inconsistancies.
An inventory was made of all areas of the City where an inconsistancy
existed. The areas which staff identified as having any of the
inconsistancies listed below are shown on the attached map:
a) The present use is non -conforming with existing zoning.
(Example - existing duplex (R-2) dwelling is in an R-1, single
family zone.)
b) The present use is non -conforming with the Comprehensive Plan.
(Example - The Comprehensive Plan designates an area as being
medium density residential, although the present use is
business.)
c) The present use is non -conforming with both the existing zoning
and the Comprehensive Plan.
d) Vacant property, where the existing zoning does not conform to
the dcsignation given to it in the Comprehensive Plan.
The Planning Commission reviewed this map and, based upon neighborhood
character/Comprehensive Plan designations, recommended rezonings which
would bring the zoning into conformance with the existing use and the
Comprehensive Plan. On certain particular parcels where the proposed
zoning would not bring it into conformance with the Comprehensive
Plan, a revision to the Comprehensive Plan is being recommended.
Following completion of the rezonings, a review of the Comprehensive
Plan will be conducted.
Mayor and City Council
February 16, 1984
Page Two of Three
Staff then formulated a listing of all parcels the Planning Commission
recommended for rezonings. This list is attached for your review.
You should have already received a map which shows which parcels the
Planning Commission is recommending for rezoning and to what zone they
are being recommended. On this listing, please note column one which
identifies the type of notice staff is recommending for that partic-
ular rezoning. There are three different types (Letters A, B and C)
of notices which would be sent to the affected property owners. The
different types are as follows:
Notice A - Parcels which are identified as receiving a notice
type A are those which staff, along with the City Attorney,
considered being non -controversial. These parcels include
those that are being rezoned to bring the zoning into confor-
mance with the use which presently exists on the property or to
bring the zoning into conformance with the Comprehensive Plan.
Many parcels included in this category are those that were
rezoned by motion of the City Council but no ordinance was ever
drafted and adopted which officially rezoned it. In other
words, the rezoning was not completed at the time of develop-
ment approval. On parcels in this category that are being
recommended for rezoning where the new zone would make it
inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan, the Planning Commis- O
sion is recommending a revision be made to the Comprehensive
Plan. No notice would be sent to the property owner, only
publication of the hearing date and time in the official news-
paper.
Notice B - Parcels which were identified as receiving notice
type B are those which staff, along with Attorney Meyers,
considered being controversial. The rezoning may create an
inconsistency with the Comprehensive Plan (in this case the
Comprehensive Plan should be amended) or the rezoning may make
the existing use non -conforming. The type of public hearing
notice that would be sent would be a notice to the affected
property owner in addition to all property owners within 350
feet. A majority of the controversial rezonings would make the
existing use non -conforming. Should the building he destroyed,
the same use would not be allowed to be reinstated.
Notice C - This notice type would consist of those parcels
which will be rezoned to its existing use but, because the
rezoning would be considered a "down zoning" staff is recom-
mending that a letter be sent to these affected property owners
on which the owners wuuid be asked if they object or do not
object to the proposed rezoning. If they object, the rezoning
automatically falls under and is handled as a controversial
rezoning. If they do not object, it would be handled as a
non -controversial rezoning. in some cases, the Comprehensive
Plan may be amended as a result of rezonings in this notice
type category.
Mayor and City Council
February 16, 1984
Page Three of Three
Notice D - No notice would be sent for rezonings within this
category. The properties are publicly owned by either the
City (15 of the 18 are owned by the City), the County, or the
State.
Attorney Meyers has reviewed the listing and concurs with staff's
recommendation as to how they should be handled.
Staff recommends that the Council attack these rezonings in the
following manner:
1. Authorize letters to be sent to owners within the notice type C
category to determine whether they have an objection to their
particular rezoning. If they do not have an objection, it will
be placed in category A. If an objection exists it will be
placed in category B. We should allow two weeks for the
property owner to respond and possibly include a postcard with
the letter where the owner can place an 'Y' in the appropriate
box as to whether they object or not.
2. When the responses to the above have been received, staff will
publish notice of a public hearing in the newspaper for all
category A (non -controversial rezonings). At this time a
category B (controversial) list will be forwarded to the
Council along with recommendations for the grouping of parcels
for hearing purposes and procedural guidelines for conducting
the hearing.
3. Upon completion of the category A rezonings, staff will mail to
the property owners and owners within 350 feet and also publish
in the newspaper, hearing date and times for properties within
Category B (controversial). These hearings would consist of
parcels to be rezoned grouped by location.
If you have any questions on the above process or procedure, please
feel free to contact me.
FJK/bc
LAIN r A r1III v6 ALniiW y IVUD
NOTICE PROPERTY COMMENTS PROPOSED REZONING EXISTING
TYPE (From to ) USE
COM
PLAN
D
Spring Lake
R-1 to CRP
Public
Public
D
Rice Creek Land
R-1 to CRP
Public
Public
A
Miller Triangle
A request for a B-3 zone was
R-1 to B-3
Vacant,
Indust',
received and recommmended by the
R-1 zone
Planning Commission. Comp Plan
will be revised.
A
Miller B-2 Zone
B-2 to I-1
Vacant,
Industi
•
B-2 zone
A
Miller R-1 Zone
R-1 to I-1
Vacant,
Indust]
R-1 zone
D
Highway Property
I-1 and R-1
Vacant
Industi
N & S of New Hwy. 10
to CRP
Med. Dc
Trailer
Public
D
Groveland Park
R-1 to PF
Public
Public
D
Ardan Park
"
"
"
D
Hillview Park
D
Greenfield Park
D
Oakwood Park
D
Lambert Park
D
Lakeside Park
D
Silver View Park
D
Wnodcrest Park
D
Random Park
"
"
it
D
Hillview Rd. Well
It
D
City Hall Property
NOTICE PROPERTY
TYPE
D Knollwood Drive Well
D Long Lake Rd, Well
D Idustrial Park Tower
A Mounds View Mobile
Home Park
A Colonial Village
Mobile Home Park
A Townsedge Terrace
Mobile Home Park
A 8270 Pleasant Vw Dr
A 8280 Pleasant Vw Dr
A 8284 Pleasant Vw Dr
A 8265 Pleasant Vw Dr
A 8275 Pleasant Vw Dr
A 8285 Pleasant Vw Dr
A 8240 Pleasant Vw Dr
A 8250 Pleasant Vw Dr
A 8260 Pleasant Vw Dr
A 8235 Pleasant Vw Dr
A 8245 Pleasant Vw, Dr
A 8255 Pleasant Vw Dr
A
I8228/30 Plsnt Vw Dr
COMMENTS
PROPOSED REZONING
EXISTING
COMP
(From_ to_)
ZONING
PLAN USE
R-1 to PF
Public
Public
R-1 to PF
Public
Public
R-1 to PF
Public
Public
'ler
A new R-5 zone was established B-3 to R-5 R-2,CUP Lra
Park
specifically for mobile home parks
„ B-3 to R-5 R-2,CUP Trailer
Park
B-3 to R-5 R-2,CUP Trailer
Park
Rezoning not completed at time of B-4 to R-1 Low Den- Low
development proposal sity,R-1 Density
I 11
" " "
n "
n " u
11
u n
it
II
II
11 1 B-4 to R-2
Low Den-1 it
sity,R-2l
COMPREHENSIVE REZONINGS
PAGE 4 OF 8
NOTICE
TYPE
PROPERTY
COMMFNTS
PROPOSED REZONING
(From to_)
EXISTING
ZONING
OMP
N USE
B
Northeast Marine
B-3 to R-3
B-3
Med. Den.
A
7750 Silver Lk Rd
Comp Plan will be revised
R-3 to R-4
R-4
Low Den.
C
2740 Highway 10
B-3 to B-2
Vacant
P.U.D.
A
2732 Highway 10
B-1 to B-2
B-2
"
A
2724 Highway 10
B-1 to B-2
Vacant
"
A
2716 Highway 10
B-1 to B-2
Vacant
"
A
2708 Highway 10
A
2704 Highway 10
A
Large triangle lot
"
north of St. Paul
Waterworks east of
Silver Lake Road
A
L-shaped lot north
of St. Paul Water-
works east of Silver
Lake Road
B
7801 Silver Lk Rd
R-2 to B-2
R-1
"
C
7831 Sunnyside Rd
Comp Plan will be revised
R-3 to R-1
R-1
High Den.
C
7841 Sunnyside Rd
Comp Plan will be revised
R-3 to R-1
R-1
"
A
2657 Highway 10
R-3 to R-4
R-4
"
A
2665 Highway 10
R-3 to R-4
R-4
"
A
Mounds View Square
B-3 to B-4
B-1 to
Hwy. Comm.
B-4
A
2565 County Rd. I
Rezoning not completed at develop-
R-1 to R-2
Vacant
Low Den.'
ment approval
PAGE 3 OF 8
rAMDDRNRNQTVR RE70NINGS
COMMENTS
PROPOSED REZONING
EXISTING
ZONING
NOTICE
PROPERTY
(From_ to_)
TYPE
8225/27 Plsnt Vw Or
Rezoning not completed at time of
B-4 to R-2
Lo�yDeen-
.A
development proposal
A
8126/28 Plsnt Vw Ct
A
8117/19 Plant Vw Ct
A
3001/03 Highway 10
A
8156/58 Spring Lk Rd
B-3 to R-2
B-3,CUP
B
Mid -American Auto
B-3 to R-1
B-3,CUP
B
K-Gas Station
B-3 to R-2
B-4
B
Steve's Appliances
B
Church Triangle
A CUP is presently on file requir-
R-3 to R-1
Vacant,
Rzone
ing this property be used as church
parking thus the R-1 zone
A
Knollwood Green
not cp�oposaled at time
R-3 to R-4
Density, High
ofzdeve9opment
R-4
B-3 to R-3
B-3,CUP
B
Import Auto,
2848 Highway 10
R-1 to R-3
R-2
A
7920 Groveland Rd.
R-1 to R-2
R-1
A
7880 Groveland Rd.
B
7860 Groveland Rd.
R-R-2
3 to
R-3
B-2 to B-1
B-3
B
Simon's Liquor
B-3 to R-3
B-4
B
Pak Co.,
2832 Highway 10
g-3 to R-3
B-3
B `
1 ..�nc inn HiahwaY 10
� ,-
qWMP
USE
Low
Density
11
Med. Den.
Low Den.
church
Med. Den./
Low Den.
Med. Den.
Med. Den.
Low Den.
Low Den.
Neighbor-
hood Comm.
Med. Den.
Med. Den.
COMPREHENSIVE REZONINGS
NOTICE PROPERTY
TYPE
A 12581 County Rd. I
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
L
2508 Highway 10
2500 County Rd. I
7666 Woodlawn Dr.
2458 County Rd. I
2466 County Rd. I
7635 Woodlawn Dr.
7645 Woodlawn Dr.
7655 Woodlawn Dr.
7640 Edgewood Dr.
7636/40 Woodlawn Dr
7642/46 Woodlawn Dr
7650 Woodlawn Dr
7622/24 Woodlawn Dr
7626 Woodlawn Dr
7630 Woodlawn Dr
Tom Thumb,
2408/10 County Rd. I
2370 County Rd. I
7501 Greenfield Ave.
A 17511 Greenfield Ave.1
COMMENTS
ttezoning not completed at develop-
ment approval
Comp Plan will be revised
PROPOSED REZONING EXI
(From_ to_) zC
R-1 to R-2 R-2
R-3 to R-4
,
,
,
R-3 to R-2
,
,
B-3 to B-1
IR-4
R-2
B-1
R-3 to R-4 R-4
u �
•uaa g6TH
V-x
V-a
04
£-a
Z-B
Z-9
0;
T-I
V-a
V-a
0;
E-a
V-a
V-a
0;
T-I
V-a
V-a
0a
T-H
'a•0'd
Z-a
Z-a
04
I -a
•uaa mul
Z-a
Z-a
04
T-a
uaa n07
Z-a
Z-a
04
T-a
11
II
II
•uaa g6TH
V-a
V-a 04 E-a
3SO
9NINOZ
(
0a
woad)
d J
ONI•ISIX3
ONINOZ3a
MUM
B d0 9 SJtld
Tenoadde auaw
-doTanap ae palaidwoo aou 6uTuozag
SSN3WWOO
uaaa0 PueTaoos
sao7 spooM
aXe7 aanTTS TTtl tl
I •pa Aauno0 TT/60SZ tl
I 'pa hauno0 EO/TOSZ tl
•aa uoSNoer TOYS tl
•aa uosNoer SVVS tl
•ax3 6aagoa0 ST£Z tl
•ax3 6.3agoa0 SOEZ tl
I 'pa haunoo OZ£Z v
I 'pa dauno0 OTEZ v
I ' pa Ajunoo OOEZ tl
*is 6aagoa0 SBZZ y
•-4S 6aagoa0 SLZZ tl
I ' Pa AjunoO BBZZ tl
•any pTaT;uaaa0 T99L tl
-any pT9T;uaaa0 T99L tl
any plaT;uaaag ML tl
OAV PT9T;ua9a0 TE9L tl
antl PIaT;uaaa0 TESL tl
any p191;uaaa0 TZSL Y
3dxS
3OIZON
U
Aluad0ad
SJNINOZSH
•a•n•a
• u a0 Mo7
• ua0 Mo7
•ua0
3Sa�
r-a
z-a
mi
Tu,.
P[JECIZ
0 Cm
IIA VF �FN �
RFF�� Lz!
F
(FG►R0 R
I(S)
Al
v
v
V
V
H
v
3axz
3OI7AN
COMPREHENSIVE REZONINGS
PAGE 6 OF 8
PROPERTY
COMMENTS
PROPOSED REZONING
(From to
EXISTING
ZONING
P
USE
NOTICE
TYPE
A
7521 Greenfield Ave.
R-3 to R-4
R-4
High Den.
A
7531 Greenfield Ave.
A
7631 Greenfield Ave.
A
7641 Greenfield Ave.
A
7651 Greenfield Ave.
A
7661 Greenfield Ave.
„
to
n
A
2288 County Rd. I
A
2275 Groberg St.
n
to
A
2285 Groberg St.
p
11
A
2300 County Rd. I
n
u
u
A
2310 County Rd. I
A
2320 County Rd. I
A
2305 Groberg Ext.
A
2315 Groberg Ext.
A
5445 Jackson Dr.
A
5401 Jackson Dr.
R-1 to R-2
R-2
Low Den.
A
2501/03 County Rd. I
R-1 to R-2
R-2
Low Den.
A
2509/11 County Rd. I
A
All Silver Lake
Rezoning not completed at develop-
R-1 to R-2
R-2
P.U.D.
Woods Lots
ment approval
R-1 to R-4
I-1 to R-4
R-4
R-4
go
R-3 to R-4
R-4
"
I-1 to B-2
B-2
"
A
Scotland Green
R-3 to R-4
R-4
High Den.
UREH
LICE
fPE
REZONINGS
PROPERTY
7690/92 sliver LK Kn
7680/82 Silver Lk Rd
7373 Knollwood Dr.
Tom Thumb,
7305 Knollwood Dr.
7-11 Store,
7295 Silver Lk. Rd.
2752 County Rd. H-2
2 lots north of
7190 Silver Lk.Rd.
7180 Silver Lk. Rd.
7190 Silver Lk. Rd.
Harstad Property,
Silver Lk. Rd.
Harstad Property,
County Rd. H-2
2650 County Rd. H-2
5301/11 Edgewood Dr.
5284 Greenfield Ave.
5200 O'Connell Dr.
5210 O'Connell Dr.
5220 O'Connell Dr.
5230 O'Connell Dr.
COMMENTS
Comp Plan will be revised
Comp Plan will be revised
Comp Plan will be revised
Comp Plan will be revised
„
m
PAGE
PROPOSED REZONING EXISTIN
(From to_)l ZONING
R-1
to
R-2
R-2
R-1
to
R-2
R-2
R-2
to
R-1
R-1
B-2
to
B-1
B-1
B-3
to
B-1
B-1
R-3
to
R-2
R-2
R-3
to
R-1
Vacant
R-3 to R-4
R-3 to R-4
B-3 to R-1
R-3 to R-1
R-1 to R-3
R-1 to R-3
R-1 to R-2
R-3 to R-4
B-3 to R-1
11
R-4
R-4
Vacant
R-3
R-1
R-2
R-4
R-1
COMPREHENSIVE REZONINGS
PAGE 8QE 8
NpTICE
.TYPE
PROPERTY
COMMENTS
PROPOSED REZONING
(From to
EXISTING
ZONING
WOMP
PLAN USE
A
5240 O'Connell Dr.
Comp Plan will be revised
B-3 to R-1
R-1
Med. Den.
A
5250 O'Connell Dr.
R.1
11
A
5260 O'Connell Dr..
"
It
B
South corner of Old
R-1 to CRP
Vacant
Public
Highway 8 and
(Park)
County Road H
City of Mounds View
WHEREAS, Jerry Pomerleau has been appointed a United States
Jaycee Ambassador; and
WHEREAS, in that capacity Jerry Pomerleau represents not
only all of the Jaycees in the United States, but also the
Mounds View Jaycees and the City of Mounds View; and
WHEREAS, Jerry Pomerleau has served the residents of
Mounds View through his participation in the Mounds View Jaycees
in an unselfish and dedicated manner and is deserving of our
heartfelt appreciation; and
WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Mounds View City Council
to recognize Jerry Pomerleau for his outstanding achievement.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Mounds View hereby proclaims Friday, Maich 2, 1984 as
JERRY POMERLEAU DAY
in honor of his exceptional community service and outstanding
achievement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have hereunto set our hands and caused the
Seal of the City of Mounds View to be affixed this 27th day
of February in the year of Our Lord one thousand nine hundred
and eighty-four.
(SEAL) Mayor Pic —
Carty
CounclTm-emFor Blanchard Comic ilmember Doty
Ceuncilmamber tian nner Cuu�lmem er Lin e
RESOLUTION NO. 1719
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION COMMENDING JERRY POMERLEAU FOR BEING
APPOINTED A UNITED STATES JAYCEE AMBASSADOR
WHEREAS, Jerry Pomerleau has been appointed a United States
Jaycee Ambassador; and
WHEREAS, the rank of Ambassador is the highest office that
can be held on the national level; and
WHEREAS, Jerry Pomerleau has performed in an outstanding
manner representing the Mounds View Jaycees and the City of Mounds
View on a national level.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the
City of Mounds View, on behalf of the residents of the City of
Mounds View, hereby congratulate and heartily commend Jerry Pomerleau
for being appointed a United States Jaycee Ambassador.
Adopted this 27th day of February, 1984.
ATTEST:
Mayor McCarty
Councilmember Blanrhard Councilmember Doty
Councilmember Hankner
Councilmember Linke
(SEAL)
Clerk -Administrator Pauley
�&t' is
TO: Mayor 6 Council
FROM: Finance Director-'Preasurer
BATE: February 15, 1984
RE: REFUND Or MEZZENGA SECURITY DEPOSIT
It has come to my attention that at the February 13, 1984 Council
Meeting a discussion took place regarding whether or not the City
was obligated to refund the security deposit of John Mezzenga with
interest from the date that the deposit was originally made. Reso-
lution No. 777 Establishing A Development Escrow Fund, states that
all security deposits made in connection with Development Agreements
which are paid in the form of cash shall be deposited in an interest
bearing savings account and that upon satisfactory fulfillment of
the terms of the Development Agreement, as determined by the Council,
payment of the security deposit plus interest accrued thereon shall
be made. It is my understanding from past discussions with our
former auditing firm that this resolution was adopted in response
to a change in.State laws governing deposits which requires that
interest be paid on all deposits made to municipalities. The theory
is that since anyone requiring a deposit is depriving the depositor
of the use of his money interest should be paid on that deposit.
Mr. Mezzenga's deposit was picked in the Development Escrow Fund
and the monies in the Development Escrow Fund have been deposited
in a savings account at the First State Bank of New Brighton. As
of Decemher 31, 1983 interest on Mr. Mezzenga's deposit of $1,000.00
amounts to $433.74. Mr. Mezzenga will be entitled to additional
interest for the period January 1, 1984 until the release of his
security as authorized by the Council. The savings account in which
the monies of the Development Escrow Fund are deposited is an account
on which the interest rate varies with the ninety-one day treasury
bill rate. Therefore, we will not know the exact interest rate or
amount of interest earned on the deposit until the end of the calendar
quarter or March 31, 1984 at which time we will receive a statement
of interest earned on the account from the First State Bank of New
Brighton. At that time a refund of additional interest would be due
Mr. Mezzenga.
Should you have any questions on this matter do not hesitate to contact
me.
DB/ds
Attachment
RESOLUTION NO. 777
® CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
ESTABLISHING DEVELOPMENT ESCROW FUND
WHEREAS, the Council requires that a security deposit be
made with all Development Agreements, and
WHEREAS, from time to time such security deposits are made
in the form of cash or other fully negotiable instruments, and
WHEREAS, the Council acknowledges that such security deposits
are submitted by developers in good faith to assure their compliance
with the terms of their respective Development Agreements, and
WHEREAS, the Council desires to provide adequate safekeeping
and proper accounting of such deposits and to accrue interest
thereon, and
WHEREAS, the Council acknowledges that such deposits may be
reclaimed by a developer after faithful completion of the respective
Development Agreement,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Council of the City
of Mounds View does hereby establish the Development Escrow Fund
for the purpose of safekeeping and properly accounting for all
deposits that are submitted to secure Development Agreements.
The Council authorizes the First State Bank of New Brighton to
open a savings account in the name of this FUND and hereby
appropriates one dollar ($1.00) to maintain said account.
All Development Agreement negotiable security deposits shall
be deposited by the Clerk in said account. Interest shall be
earned on the account in accordance with normal savings account
procedures of the Bank. All interest earned shall be distributed
according to and in the same proportion as is the principal amount
of each Development Agreement security deposited therein. Any
interest earned and payable to a developer shall be paid after the
last quarter in which the Bank credits interest on the deposit.
Upon satisfactory fulfillment of the terms of the Development
Agreement, as determined by the Council, the Council shall authorize
remittance to the developer of the deposited security. The
Clerk shall submit an estimate of interest accrued thereon and
be authorized to make the appropriate withdrawals from the savings
account and Submit to the Council fpr naumon�
• Adopted this 22nd day of November, 1976.
ATTEST:
l
Mav
(SEAL)
Clerk -A ministrator
•
6TO: Mayor & Council
FROM: Finance Director -Treasurer
DATE: February 15, 1984
RE: REQUEST FOR ADJUSTMENT OF SEWER BILL FROM CHEMCLEAN TRUCK WASH
Attached please find a letter received from Gregory S. Kelley of
ChemClean Truck Wash dated February 2, 1984. Mr. Kelley is request-
ing an adjustment of his sewer utility billing. The sewer charge
of the ChemClean Truck Wash was based on their previous years water
consumption and is $624.75 per quarter. The ChemClean Truck Wash
has subsequently put in a well and is using the water from the well
to wash trucks. City water is being used for one toilet and two
sinks. I have discussed this matter with City Building Official Rose
and he states that City water is not being used in the truck washing
operation and is only being used for the toilet and the two sinks.
Therefore, I believe that the City has no choice but to adjust the
sewer bill of ChemClean Truck Wash to one REC or $29.75 per quarter.
RECOMMENDATION: Adjust the sewer bill of ChemClean Truck Wash to
one REC or $29.75 per quarter.
1
DB/ds
Attachment
I
WASH
February 2, 1984
CITY OF MOUNDSVIEW
2401 Highway 10
Moundsview, MN 55112
6715 ASHTON AVENUE • FRIDLEY, MINNESOTA 55432
PHONE: (612) 786.9130
"WE BRING THE WASH TO YOU"
Gentlemen:
Please take note that the nature of this business is to fill our
trucks with water and transport it elsewhere for cleaning the
equipment of others. Therefore, we make virtually no use of the
sewer system of Moundsview. When we were in Spring Lake Park,
we were e for
transportednted two out and oneaforeusetwith theesewernwater to be
system.
When we relocated our business in Moundsview, we requested a sep-
arate meter for water not to be used in conjunction with the sewer
' system and also one for water that I,: -As to be used with the sewer
system.
When I met with the city council at Moundsview, they denied my
request. This made it necessary for me to put in a well, which
I did.
At present I am using city water ana sewer iut only one
o
et
and two sinks and I am still being charged for sewer I never did
use.
I am requesting that my sewer bill be adjusted to the water I
have consumed in the last three months as this represents the
actual sewer usage since I moved in.
Enclosed is a copy of our previous request for separate meters
and also a copy of our latest bill showing minimal water usage
and large sewer charges.
Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. If any
further information is needed to attend to this matter, I am
available at 786-9130 or 574-7457.
Yours truly,
9�� 5 /
-Gregofy S. Kelley
jek
Enclosures
PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA
Regular Meeting
: February13, 1984
Mounds View City Hall
jED 4f -tid d u �� 2401 Hky. 10, 'Hounds View, MN 55112
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The Mounds View City Council was called to order by 1. Call to Order
Mayor McCarty at 7:30 PM on February 13, 1984.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Councilmembers Hankner, Blanchard, 2. Roll Call
Doty, Lin e and Mayor McCarty.
ALSO PRESENT: Attorney Rushton and Clerk/Admini-
strat�auiey.
Motion/Second: Hankner/Blanchard to approve the 3. Approval of
January , 984 minutes as corrected. Minutes:
January 23, 19F
5 ayes 0 nays
Motion Carried
There were no residents requests or comments from 4. Residents Re -
the floor, quests and
Comments from
the Floor
Robert Beutel made a presentation to the Council, 5. Presentation or
reviewing the rules and responsibilities of the Task Activities of
Force, and reviewed the issues of updating the Metropolitan
aviation chapter, and the process to be used, as Council Aviatic
well as the tentative schedule of Task Force Policy Plan
meetings at the various airports. He advised Task Force
the meeting at the Anoka County Airport would be
in approximately four weeks.
Mr. Beutel recommended the Council go through their
old Aviation Chapter and mark it up with their questions
and comments, and he advised the Council on how
he would recommend they proceed.
Dennis Petrini, 8434 Sunnyside Road, asked Mr.
Beutel's function with the Council and the airport.
Mr. Beutel replied he is a resident of Mounds View,
as well as a pilot, and he is involved in testifying
before the Legislature regarding the upgrading of
the Anoka County Airport, and that he was appointed
to the Task Force. He stated he is against expan-
sion of the airport, but in favor of some of the
proposed changes.
Mounds View City Council ]sf�,� February 13, 1984
Regular Meeting-.J a t L Page Two
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mr. Petrini asked if Mr. Beutel was employed by
the City, Mayor McCarty replied he was not, that
he is a member of the Task Force, He added the
Council is looking for a consultant with pro-
fessional credentials to critique the Master Plan
for the Anoka County Airport, as adopted,,as4 to
help the City substantiate their claims.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley added the City has sub-
mitted requests to 27 national firms, asking for
their bid on reviewing the plan, and so far have
heard from 10 who said no, and one who is interested.
Councilmember Hankner stated the Council has autho-
rized Staff to find a consultant, but not to hire
them, and that the Council will review the applications
first. She also reviewed some of the questions the
Council would like answered.
Mr. Petrini pointed out the instrument landing system
has been approved by MAC, and would then be turned
over to the FAA, and questioned why the City doesn't
fight the airport on an environmental basis.
Mayor McCarty agreed that the environmental issue
is very important, and that the Council will advise -'
the consultant of what the Council's stand is, and
ask how they could help substantiate it. i
Clerk/Administrator Pauley advised Mr. Petrini he
would provide him with a copy of the letter sent to
the consulting firms. He also explained that the City
should not fight the battle on the environmental issue
issues alone, but rather on the man; issL,,., involved, so that
if they lose in one area, there are still others to
work on,
The Council thanked Mr. Beutel for his presentation.
Motion/Second: McCarty/Doty to approve the Consent 6. Approval of
AgenAgen anus Items D, E and H, and waive the read- Consent Agenda
ing of the resolutions.
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Mayor McCarty explained that for items D and E, he
would like to give direct recognition to the indi-
viduals involved.
Motion/Second: McCarty/Linke to approve the
appo ntment of Mr. Robert Beutel and Mr, Russell
Warren to one year terms and Mr. Stephen Lauterback
and Ms. Maribeth Margo to two year terms on the Energy
Council, and the appointment of Mr. Beutel as
Chairperson.
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Mounds View City Council. -:.•';;•; •' February 13, 1984
Regular Meeting U N At � „'•, __ � Page Three
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Motion/Second: McCarty/Linke to approve the appoi.nt-
ment o r. Iichael Lauterbach and Mrs. Betty Johnson
to two year terms and Mr. Peter Sargent to a three
year term on the Planning Commission.
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Regarding Item 6, Mayor McCarty stated he had no
problem with returning the security but questioned
why interest should be paid, as the applicant was
responsible to see that he received his fee back,
and questioned whether the City should be respon-
sible for seeking out applicants, as they are
aware the City is holding their security.
Motion/Second: McCarty/Doty to approve Resolution
No. 1713-,—a—n-d waive the reading, and amend the last
paragraph to read Now, therefore, be it resolved
that the City Council of the City of Mounds View
authorizes the release of the $1,000 security to
John Mezzenga.
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Motion/Second: McCarty/Doty to reappoint Dick
Para i— se to the Civil Service Commission for a
three year term.
Councilmember Nankner - nay
Councilmember Blanchard - nay
Councilmember Doty - aye
Councilmember Linke - nay
Mayor McCarty - aye Motion Failed
There was considerable discussion that took place
before the vote on the previous motion.
Mayor McCarty advised Councilmember Blanchard that
he would allow her to abstain from the vote as her
husband is on the Civil Service Commission, and he
did not wish to place her in a position of having
a conflict of interest.
Councilmember Blanchard stated she personally did
not feel she had a conflict of interest, and that
if Mayor McCarty had felt it would be a conflict
of interest on the past of the Council, he should
not have made the appointment of her husband. She
pointed out that she had abstained on the vote when
her husband was appointed, and asked for the opini.on
of the attorney as to whether this would be a conflict
of interest.
Attorney Rushton advised that in reviewing the ordinance
and State law, a conflict of interest would have to
be monetary, and that as long as no money is involved,
Mounds View City Counci February 13, 1984•
Regular Meeting +M S,. Page Four
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
there would not be a conflict of interest. She
added that she had conferred with Attorney Meyers,
and he agreed with her findings. She added that
Councilmember Blanchard was authorized to vote
as long as she did not she had a personal conflict.
Mayor McCarty stated that Councilmember Blanchard
had abstained last time to avoid a charge of nepotism
or undue influence, and that while this may not be
a conflict of interest in the eyes of the law, it
is her decision.
Councilmember Linke reported he had already obtained
the opinion of Attorney Mayers that no commission
member has a vested right of reappointment, and that
he personally cannot support the reappointment of
Mr. Paradise as he has shown an inability to perform
in an acceptable manner.
Mayor McCarty stated it has been the Council's
practice to reappoint anyone who has done a good,
acceptable job, and he does not wish to give the
impression to commission members that if they
differ with the Council, they may not be reappoint-
ed. He added there should be specific charges
to give to Mr. Paradise. ,
Councilmember Hankner stated she could not support
Mr. Paradise, as other candidates had applied who
were more qualified and willing to serve.
Motion/Second: Linke/Blanchard co have the second ). 2nd Reading and
rea ing and adoption of Ordinance No. 354, amending Adoption of
the Municipal Code of Mounds View by amending Chapter Ord. No. 354
41 entitled "Specific Rezonings" and waive the reading.
Councilmember Hankner - aye
Councilmember Blanchard - aye
Councilmember Doty - aye
Councilmember Linke - aye
Mayor McCarty - aye
Motion/Second: Doty/Linke to have the second reading
and adoption of Ordinance No. 355, amending the
Municipal Code of Mounds View by amending Chapter 40
entitled "Zonings", and waive the reading.
Councilmember
Councilmember
Councilmember
Councilmember
Mayor McCarty
Hankner - aye
Blanchard - aye
Doty - aye
Linke - aye
- aye
Motion Carried
2nd Reading and
Adoption of
Ord. No, 355
MotiLa Calk
•
Mounds View City Council
,
:::..'
�"1j
,... 1.bra
.:;,t'a ;'' .i..
h F
d n H a
February 13, 1984
Page Five
Regular Meeting
--------------------------
-----------
k y
------------------
------------------
UClerk/Administrator Pauley
presented
No. 356,
the Council
which included
9, 2nd Reading an(
Adoption of
with a new copy of Ordinance
No. 356
the changes recommended by
the Council
at their
Ord.
last'agenda session.
Motion/Second: Doty/Blanchard to have the second
reading and adoption of Ordinance No. 356, establish-
ing Chapter 27 of the Municipal Code Entitled "Special
Projects Fund", .and waive the reading.
Councilmember Hankner - aye
Councilmember Blanchard - aye
Councilmember Doty - aye
Councilmember Linke - aye
Mayor McCarty - aye
Motion/Second: McCarty/Doty to amend the ordinance
Co be in con7ormance with the correspondence from
Staff on 27.05.
Councilmember Hankner - aye
Councilmember Blanchard - aye
Councilmember Doty - aye
Councilmember Linke - aye
' Mayor McCarty - aye
Motion/Second: Doty/Linke to approve Resolution
No, aut orizing a transfer of funds from
the Special Projects Fund to the General Fund,
and waive the reading.
5 ayes 0 nays
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported that per
Council's request, Staff has determined that
$1,401 was a fair price for the installation of
sewer services.
Motion/Second: Doty/Linke to approve the request
or a refund for sewer service installation at
2581/83 County Road I, being an error on the City's
part in not installing the sewer
street where it was assessed for,
to be $1,401.00, to be taken fro
sewer account.
5 ayes 0 nays
m
connection in the
with the refund
the appropriate
�
Mayor McCarty asked what the assessed cost, with 1, interest, would be. Clerk/Administrator Pauley
replied Staff did not determine that as the Council
had directed Staff to find the fair market value.
Motion Carried
Motion Carried
10. Consideration c
Rslt. No. 1717
Motion Carried
11. Consideration c
Request for
Refund on Sewev
Service Instal'
tion at 2581/8:
County Road I
Motion Carried
Mayor McCarty stated he knew of an instance where
1 a r
Mounds View CityCouncil
Regular Meeting February �'"QD February 13, 1984
Vd"id "" Page Six
----------
--------------------------
the property owner had not allowed the sewer service
Clerk/Administratorto be put in when l
Pauleyl the oreplied thers ethat ethis pwas lonly '
the second time this problem has occurred in the City,
and Building Inspector Rose has requested that guide-
lines be set for any future occurrences.
Motion/Second: Linke/Hankner to appoint Steve
hatches er as Director of Public Works/Community12' StevAppoin hate eof
r
Development at a starting salary of $31,000/ ar Steve Thatcher t
with a three month and six month adjustment of Director of
$400 and $600 respectively, contingent u Public Works/
on
p satisfactory job performance, Community Dvlpt.
5 ayes 0 nays
Motion Carried
Clerk/Administrator Pauley advised that Mr. Thatcher
will be starting on March 5.
Attorney
with Mr.
Rushton advised
Ratelle regarding
she will be checking
Greg Johnson's
13, Report of
business,
if she does not
hear back from him,
Attorney
Councilmember Hankner reported Claudia Korsun,
who was in charge of the beauty pagent last year, 14. Reports of
would like to be placed on the next agenda for CouncilmemL .s
discussion.
Mnt;n_ _n/�; Hankner/Linke to appoint Charlene
Blackstone to the Civil Service Commission.
3 ayes 2 nays
Motion Carried
Councilmember Doty and Mayor McCarty voted against
the motion.
There was considerable discussion before the vote
on the motion.
Councilmember Hankner stated she had made the
motion for Ms. Blackstone as she has extensive educa-
tional and working experience in personnel management,
has a high level of interest in civic activities,
has a very independent personality and could pro-
vide some form of affirmative action input into
the Civil Service Commission.
Mayor McCarty stated that while State law supercedes
the City ordinance in reference to commission
and appointments, thatwhen he hpreviously addiscuss discussed Mayor's
withthesCouncil earlier, they had indicated they would leave it
that way. He stated he would like a motion made,
Mounds View City Council+�{ C'February 13, 1984
Regular Meeting o e N c Page Seven
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
relieving him of the duty of making commission
appointment recommendations.
Councilmember Blanchard questioned that, since
the original motion had failed, whether Mayor
McCarty was ready to make another motion. Mayor
McCarty replied that he was not, at this time.
Motion/Second: Hankner/Linke to call for the
question
3 ayes 2 nays
Mayor McCarty and Councilmember Doty voted against
the motion, which then failed, lacking a 4/5 vote.
Mayor McCarty stated the Council had stated they
would prefer to have him making the commission
appointment recommendations.
Councilmember Hankner pointed out no formal motion
was made to that effect, and she does not see any
need to make a specific motion relieving the Mayor
of any duty, as the State law explains itself.
Councilmember Doty stated he had voted against
the motion, not because of the person but because
of the policy change.
Mayor McCarty stated it has always been the policy
of the Council to reappoint commission members who
have not been shown to have committed misfeasence
in office, and that as part of the process this
year, those icicnrduent c rnmiasiorcrso-r he Wished to
continue service to the City were automatically
reappointed, and that it was understood that if
an incumbent was not to be reappointed, that
person would receive specific reasons in writing
from the Council, which could be completely aired
at a public hearing. He added that in this parti-
cular case, he feels the commissioner was not
given the opportunity and courtesies he should
have received, nor was there a proven case of
malfeasence, and removal was arbitrary.
Councilmember Blanchard had no report.
Councilmember Doty reported the ditch repair work
on County Road H2 and Long Lake Road appears to
be going along well.
Councilmember Doty reported he would not be able
to attend the City Dinner planning meeting on
February 15, as he will be out of town.
Councilmember Linke reported he would not be able
Motion Failed
rY'� m� � i+.
Mounds View City CouncilL
^`' '.° wl� �ED
February 13, 1984
Regular Meeting �' n G i • ' Page Eight
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
to attend the planning meeting either, as he would '
be attending the Ramsey County League meeting.
Councilmember Hankner reported she would not be
able to attend the meeting either.
Mayor McCarty had no report.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported he had received 15. Report of
a call from Ed Latender, informing him that Jerry Administrator
Pomerleau of the Jaycee's had been appointed a
United Stated Jaycee Ambassador, which is the
highest appointment possible. It was agreed to
recognize Mr. Pomerleau's achievement with both
a resolution and a Jerry Pomerleau day.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported the City Clerks
of Ramsey County have been exploring completely
automating election voter registration records,
and explained the benefit it would to provide to
the City. He added that the cost to Mounds View
would be $150.32.
Motion/Second: McCarty/Linke to authorize Clerk/
A ministrator Pauley to indicate to the County
that the City would like to proceed with computer-
izing election voter registration records.
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Clerk/Administrator Pauley updated the Council on
the status of court consolidation, and stated it
would be on the agenda for discussion at the
next agenda meeting.
Motion/Second: Doty/Blanchard to adjourn the meeting 16. Adjournment
at
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Respectfully submitted,
Donald F. Pauley
Clerk/Administrator
0
DATE: APPROVED: 2/13/84
PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA
"` p Regular Meeting
APP
y. E;January 23, 1954
Mounds View City Hall
2401 Hwy. 10, Mounds View, MN 55112
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The Mounds View City Council was called to order by 1. Call to Order
Mayor McCarty at 7:30 PM on January 23, 1984.
MEMBERS PRESENT: COunCilmembers Linke, Hankner, 2. Roll Call
Blanchard, Doty and Mayor McCarty.
ALSO PRESENT: City Attorney Meyers and Clerk/
A ministrator Pauley.
Motion/Second: Doty/Linke to approve the January 3. Approval of
9, minutes as presented. Minutes:
January 9, 1984
5 ayes 0 nays
Motion Carried
Frank Gabrysh, 2,832 County Road J, asked if any- 4. Residents Re -
thing different was being done to the water, as his quests and
smelled of chlorine and was very foul. Clerk/ Comments from
Administrator Pauley replied that a new chlorine the Floor
tank was started, and it can sometimes take awhile
for it to distribute evenly.
Mayor McCarty asked that someone from the water
department go over and obtain a sample.
Motion/Second: Doty/Blanchard to approve the con- 5. Approval of
sent agenda, as presented, and waive the reading of. Consent Agenda
the resolutions.
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Motion/Second: Linke/Blanchard to have the first 6. 1st Reading of
rea ng o rdinance No. 355, amending the Municipal Ord. No. 355
Code of Mounds View by amending Chapter 40 entitled,
"Zoning", and waive the reading.
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Mounds View City Council January 23, 19844
Regular Meeting Page Two
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Councilmember Doty stated that, under Section 7. 1st Readir- -if
27,05, Amendment or Repeal, he would like to have Ord, No.
the money go back into the bond redemption fund,
rather than the general fund, unless there is a
specific purpose of use designated in Lhe general fund.
Mayor McCarty questioned if the fund is not
eliminated, with the improvement bonds that are
being defeased, Attorney Meyers replied that a
new fund is established to pay off the bonds, and
the way the ordinance is written, if it was
repealed, they would be putting the money back into
the bond fund. He recommended the language be
changed to read "shall be deposited in such fund
as the City Council directs".
Clerk/Administrator Pauley advised that Staff
proposed the general fund, as some of the money
came from the 5% that was levied on the taxes,
and the general fund is supported by the taxes.
Councilmember Hankner pointed out the present
Council has set up the concept in the ordinance,
and she feels the money should go back into the
general fund. She added that a 4/5 vote would
be required for future Council's to change the
ordinance.
There was considerable discussion among the
Council, with it being agreed to go ahead with
the first reading, and diSCUS3 further at the
next agenda session, before the second reading.
Motion/Second: McCarty/Hankner to approve the
?irsr. rea ing of Ordinance No. 356, establishing
Chapter 27 of the Municipal Code entitled,
"Special Projects Fund", and waive the reading.
4 ayes 1 nay
Councilmember Doty voted against the motion.
Mayor McCarty closed the regular meeting and opened
the public- hearing at 7:50 PM.
There were no comments from the audience. Mayor
McCarty closed the public hearing and reopened the
regular meeting at 7:50 PM.
Motion Carried
Public Hearing -
Rezone 2651 Cnty
Road I from I-1
to B-3
Motion/Second; Doty/Linke to have the first reading 9. 1st Readil.4
o rdinance No. 354, amending the Municipal Code of Ord. No, 31W
Mounds View by amending Chapter 41 entitled "Specific
Rezonings", and waive the reading.
5 ayes 0 nays
Motion Carried
Mounds View City Council Januaryy 23, 1084
Regular Meeting Page Ttigee
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Motion/Second: Linke/Hankner to approve Resolu- 10. Approve Rslt.
tion No, E704, approving the minor subdivision for No. 1704
the Burger King Corporation, and waive the reading.
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Motion/Second: Blanchard/Doty to approve Resolu- 11. Approve Rslt.
tion No. 1705, approving a conditional use permit No. 1705
for the Burger King Corporation for a convenience
food establishment, and waive the reading.
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Motion/Second: llankner/Blanchard to approve 1.2. Approve Rslt.
Resolution No. 1703, approving an amendment to No. 1703
the planned use development for the Silver Lake
Woods Development, and waive the reading.
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Motion/Second: Hankner/Linke to approve Reso- 13. Approve Rslt.
IERE n o. 07, authorizing the Clerk/Admini- No. 1707
strator and Mayor to execute Development
Agreement No. 84-64 with Burger King Corporation,
,.- and waive the -reading.
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Motion/Second: Doty/Linke to approve Resolution
Lo. rescinding Resolution No. 1425
14. Approve Rslt.
, and
transferring all assets and liabilities of the
No. 1709
special capital projects fund to the Silver Lake
Woods improvement project construction fund, and
waive the reading.
5 ayes 0 nays
Motion Carried
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported Mrs. Gale and
15, Consideration of
Ms. Yost had been advised the Council would be
Feasibility
discussing their item this evening, and he also
Report for Pub -
reported that Mrs, Gale had indicated that nothing
lic Improvements
had been done in the past two months to determine
on Fairchild
the marketability of the property, and that she
Avenue Northerly
was waiting for a feasibility report from the City,
of Laport Drive
He added that Mrs. Gale has indicated she would
like more time.
Ken Sjodin stated he
was representing Mrs. Gale,
and they now have a modification that they believe
will make the lots more valuable and buildable, and
they would like to proceed with the improvements and
Mounds View City Council January 23, 1984
Regular Meeting Page Four
------------------------------------------------------------------------
subdivision. He presented the Council with a copy '
of their new proposed plan.
Councilmember Hankner expressed concern regard-
ing the time element, as the nuisance problem still
exists, and deadlines had been set before.
Mr. Sjodin stated that if the concept is approved,
it can be drawn up properly and back to the City
within one week.
Mayor McCarty stated that while he was concerned
with the time element also, he felt the Council
should stay within their realm of responsibility,
and the plan should go back to the Planning
Commission for their review.
Motion/Second: McCarty/Doty to table any further
action on the Fairchild Avenue vacation until the
first regular Council meeting in March.
5 ayes 0 nays
Motion Carried
Councilmember Linke reminded the Council that they
had promised the residents that action would be
taken this evening, and he pointed out how very
last minute the sketch was that was just presented. '
Councilmember Hankner stated she did not feel the
Council has established that the improvements are
going to go in, and she expressed concern about
the time element, as Mrs. Gale and Ms. Yost have get a p
had a car and a half t_ ,
Y �v plan together,
and the neighbors are concerned with the time lag.
Mr. Bremmer asked the Council what was to prevent
the issue from going on and on. He reminded them
they have been working toward a resolution for 18
months, and that last October they were told a
decision would be reached by the Council in
January, and now the Council has extended that
deadline another two months, to March.
Mayor McCarty explained they could order the
vacation tonight or table further action until
March to give the applicants ample opportunity
to follow through, and that if they have not
proceeded by March, the Council can go forward
at that time with the vacation.
Mr. Bremmer stated he would like some definite
pre -established parameters set up, as the deadline
keeps being moved out. Mayor McCarty replied
that if nothing happens in March, the Council
will definitely remove the item from the table
and take some action.
Mounds View City Council
Regular Meeting
January 23, 1984
Page Five
Park Director Anderson reported the year end forest- 16
ry report had been submitted, and the joint powers
agreement program with New Brighton is working very
well; this is the first year more trees have been
put in than taken out; he advised the Council of
the potential for a gypsy moth problem; the com-
posting program was very successful, and he reviewed
the statistics, with Ramsey County wanting to open
the site again in the Spring, however, Mounds View
does not have the capability to be open twice a year.
Park Director Anderson reported the new dump truck
is up and running, and the tractor has been ordered
and should arrive later this week. Park maintenance
was the best its been in the past five years, with a
full time evening crew for flooding the rinks, and
skating conditions have been excellent. Senior
citizens have been involved in the warming house
program, and it has worked out well. The City has
also had luck with having the shelter buildings open.
The City has received preliminary funding for a 35%
grant for a jogging trail at Silver Lake Park, and
he will be talking to Burger King to see if they
are willing to assist.
The guidelines have been established for the park
planning fund, with a $2,000 check being received
1 from Honeywell. The Groveland Park association
has raised over $6,000 and completed many projects,
and he reviewed their newsletter.
Park Director Anderson reviewed the healthy lifestyle
wellness program, which is just getting off the ground.
Ile advised that three new leagues were started this
past year, adult ice hockey, 4 man adult floor hockey,
and 4 man team boot Hockey for youths. The Edgewood
Community Pool was also painted over the Christmas
holiday break.
Finance Director Brager reported the budget was
adopted, and they are gearing up for the audit and
year end financial reports. The department has been
very active with the computer, and the utility bills
are now computerized, and they are working on the
micro computer/word processor to allow doing entry
from City Hall. There is a problem in getting a
numeric key pad, as it was recalled and redesigned,
and they hope to have one soon.
Director Brager reported the financial statements will
be available for the Council as soon as the interest
figures are available and the County computer can process.
He also advised the City stayed within the snow removal
budget for 1983.
The City has hired an insurance consultant, and will be
4th Quarter
1983 Department
Head Reports
Mounds View City Council January 23, 1984
Regular Meeting Page Six
------------------------------------------------------------------------
looking at equipment and buildings the City owns, for
insurance appraisal.
The City is looking for another part-time person,
under the MFE D program, for the finance department.
The Finance Department Staff is gathering information
on a flexible benefits plan, and will be presenting
the information to the Council later.
Police Chief Ramacher reviewed the many changes that
have :.aken place in the Police Department in the past
few months. He reported Officer Brick had met with
the Jaycees and discussed the changes in the DWI laws,
and informed them of current arrest procedures. Officer
Chambers received,a letter of commendation from
New Brighton for stopping a stolen vehicle and arresting
the suspect.
The Jaycees again held their haunted house in the Police
garage, with over 2,000 attending. The part time secretary
was out on maternity leave, with the CSO filling in for
her. The Lion's Club donated $300 for police cameras.
In December, they held a department meeting and reviewed
the current rules and regulations and upcoming changes ��-
and established new policies. Chief Ramacher reported
he has since met with everyone individually, for their
comments and suggestions.
Chief Ramacher reviewed the training sessions attended
by the Police Department personnel. He also advised
that 101 applications were received for the patrolman
vacancy.
The 1983 yearly report will be delayed, as the State
is having budget problems and has been delayed in
getting out the computer print-outs. Class I crimes
declined 13% in 1983, and Class II crimes declined
9%. He also advised that in 1982, Mounds View Police
arrested more people for drunk driving than any other
department in Ramsey County, including the Sheriff's
department.
The Block Watch program has not made much progress, and
Chief Ramacher recommended putting a notice into the
newsletter, to get the information out to the residents.
Park Director Anderson reminded the Council of the
February 3 deadline for the next newsletter.
Mayor McCarty informed the Council of a call he had
received from someone ticketed for being a snowbird,
who was not aware the City had such a policy. He
suggested having each department head have an article
in each newsletter, relevent to his department.
Mounds View City Council January 23,
Regular Meeting Page Seven
------------------------------------------------•------------------
Clerk/Administrator Pauley advised that an article
had already appeared in the newsletter regarding
the snowbird policy, as well as a separate one regard-
ing the snowmn bile policy, and they are published
each year.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported the Public Works
department had drained, cleaned and inspected the
ground resevoir, removed snow from around the hydrants,
and had two water main breaks, which were handled in
house.
He reported 85% of the time of the street and sewer
department was spent in snow removal, with a sewer
break repair being done on Noodcrest.
Two new pieces of equipment came into the shop, and
one piece of used equipment was sold. LP conversions
are being done on the new vehicles after 500 miles.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reviewed the Community
Development department, with permits being issued
for 20 new single family homes, 3 duplexes, a 70 unit
motel, a 10 unit apartment, 5 condominiums and
Mr. Donut, with 243 building permits total being
issued. He reviewed the inspections and reinspections
done for the year. There were 6 minor subdivisions
and 7 major, with 23 planning applications being
processed. Revenues are greatly exceeding the
projections for 1983.
The inventory in the Public Works department is just
getting started, as there were some problems in
getting set up.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reviewed the status of
the Public works projects that are in process, and
advised that Staff is handling them.
1984
Motion/Second: Blanchard/Doty to have the second 17. 2nd Reading and
reading and adoption of Ordinance No. 353, amending Adoption of Ord.
the Municipal Code of Mounds View by amending No. 353
Chapter 41 entitled "Specific Rezonings", and
waive the reading.
Councilmember Linke - aye
Councilmember Hankner - aye
Councilmember Blahchard - aye
Councilmember Doty - aye
Mayor McCarty - aye Motion Carried
Mounds View City Council January 23, 1984
Regular Meeting Page Eight
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attorney Meyers reported that, as of January 1, 1984, 18. Report of
the City is responsible for prosecuting all gross Attorney
misdemenor offenses, which were previously handled
by the County Attorney's office. He also reported
that the consolidation of courts is still being
pursued, and updated the Council on the status of
those discussions.
Attorney Meyers reviewed some of the discussion
that occurred at a recent conference he attended
of the Municipal Attorney's Association, regarding
Citys getting into the finance business.
Councilmember Linke reported he had attended the 19. Reports of
Ramsey County League meeting, on January 18, Councilmembers
where they had discussed the Ramsey County court
consolidation.
Councilmember Hankner had no report.
Councilmember Blanchard had no report.
Councilmember Doty reviewed an article he had
read regarding Group W and their efforts to get
their contract amended.
Mayor McCarty reported there is one applicant for
two commissions, and that after speaking to the
chairman of the Festivities Commission, they do not
feel there would be a problem in the same person
serving on both commissions.
Motion/Second: McCarty/Doty to appoint Jan Lindberg
to the Lakeside Park Commission for 3 years.
5 ayes 0 nays
Motion Carried
Motion/Second: McCarty/Blanchard to appoint Jan
Lin bed rg to the Festivities Commission for 3 years.
5 ayes 0 nays
Motion Carried
Mayor McCarty reported there are four applicants for
the Energy Commission, with seven being needed.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley advised there is a draft
resolution for the Commission, and he will place
the item on the next agenda for discussion.
Motion/Second: McCarty/Linke to appoint Jerry
Blanchard Co fill the two year vacancy on the Police
Civil Service Commission.
4 ayes 0 nays 1 abstention
Motion Carried
Councilmember Blanchard abstained from the vote.
Mounds View City Council January 23, 1984
Regular Meeting Page Nine
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mayor McCarty reported the Planning Commission is
recommending the Council appoint all three applicants
to the Planning Commission, and expand the Planning
Commission to 9 members once again.
Councilmember Blanchard stated she was opposed to
expanding the Commission to 9 members, based on her
own experience of being on the Commission when they
had 9 members, and having trouble getting enough
together for a quorum, and that it was very difficult
to work with that many people.
Councilmember Linke stated he agreed with Councilmember
Blanchard's feelings.
Councilmember Doty stated he agreed with Councilmember
Blanchard also.
Councilmember Hankner pointed out that the request
to expand to 9 members was coming from the Planning
Commission itself, and perhaps they felt there was a
commitment from the members.
Mayor McCarty stated he could remember the problems
of having so many on the Planning Commission, but asked
that Staff contact Peg Mountin and convey the Council's
thoughts and questions, for the Planning Commission's
response.
Motion/Second: McCarty/Doty that it be the stated
policy that all resolutions and/or ordinances be
placed first in line on the agenda, as far as
practical.
5 aven 0 nays
Clerk/Administrator Pauley explained the criteria
used in setting the agenda.
Motion Carried
CLerk/Administrator Pauley advised the Council of 20. Report of
an article in the Met Council Newsletter, regarding Administrator
the racetrack and interaction between the racetrack
and airport. He stated Staff will be obtaining
whatever written reports are available.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported he would have
Staff contact the Highway Department regarding the
status of Highway 10.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley advised the Council
that they are working toward hiring an energy
coordinator, in conjunction with Blaine, and he
will keep them advised of the status.
Mounds View City Council January 23, 1984
Regular Meeting Page Ten
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Clerk/Administrator Pauley advised that the mailer,
advertising for a consultant regarding the Anoka
County Airport Master Plan, will be going out
nationally on January 24, giving 30 days for
proposals to be submitted to the City. He stated
he would put a copy of the letter in the Council's
boxes.
Motion/Second: Hankner/Blanchard to adjourn the 21. Adjournment
meeting at :34 PM.
5 ayes 0 nays
lotion Carried