Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Agenda Packets - 1984/04/09
CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW April 9, 1984 7:30 p.m. A G E N D A 1. Call to Order 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Roll Call - Doty, Links, Hankner, Blanchard, and McCarty 4, Approval of Minutes: March 26, 1984 (Regular Meeting) 5. Public Hearing - 8:00 p,m. - Povlitzki's Off 10 Operations 6. Residents Requests and Comments from the Floor ----------------------------------- CITIZENS: BEFORE SPEAKING PLEASE GIVE YOUR FULL NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE MINUTES ----------------------------------------- 7. Approval of Consent Agenda ITEM A. Approve Resolution No. 1727 Approving Policy State- ment on the Issue of Comparable Worth ITEM B. Set Public Hearings for Comprehensive Rezonings per the Following Schedule: May 14, 1984 - Church Triangle - /:4:) 8:00 put - 2740 Highway 10 - pm - 2 Lots North of - 8:15 pm 7190 Silver Lake Road - South Corner of Old - 8:30 pm Highway 8 & County Road H May 28, 1984 - Harstad Property, - 7:45 pm Silver Lake Road - Mid -American Auto - 8:00 pm - K Gas station - 8:15 pm - Steve's Appliances - 8:30 pm June 11, 1984 - Import Auto - 7:45 pm - 7860 Groveland Road - 8:00 pm - Simon's Liquor - 8:15 pm pm - PAC Company - 2806/08 Highway 10 - 8:45 pm June 25, 1984 - 7801 Silver Lake Road - 7:45 pm - 7373 Knollwood Drive - 8:00 pm - 2752 County Road H-2 - 8:15 pm AGENDA April 9, 1984 Page Two 7. Approval of Consent Agenda (cont.) ITEM C. Authorize TKDA to Prepare Plans and Specifications for Well No. 1 Control Center and Pump Starter Replacement and Water System Control Supervisory and Control Panel Modifications and Administer Contracts at a Cost Not to Exceed $10,000 ITEM D. Set Special Council Meeting for 6:00 pm on Wednes- day, April 11, 1984, to Discuss Findings on Anoka County -Blaine Airport with Representatives of Coffman Associates ITEM E. Approve Resolution No. 1729 Proclaiming April 21 and April 28, 1984 as "Arbor Days" and the Month of May as Arbor Month ITEM F. Authorize Staff to Proceed with the 1984 MSA Project as Outlined in a Memorandum from Public Works/ Community Development Director dated March 27, 1984 ITEM G. Licenses for Approval ITEM H. Approve Resolution No. 1730 Approving Just and Correct Claims Against City Funds 8. Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance No. 357 Adopting the 1983 Long -Term Financial Plan 9. Consideration of Petition for Pleasant view Drive Street- lights (Supplementary material to that included in April 2, 1984 packet is in this packet.) 10. Consideration of Third Step Grievance Appeal of Public Works Employee Larry Decheine 11. Consideration of Formation of a Task Force to Consider City Council and Commission Compensation 12. Report of Director of Public Works/Community Development 13. Report of Attorney 14. Report of Councilmembers - Dcty, Linke, Hankner, Blanchard, McCarty 15. Report of Administrator 16. Adjournment ' At / PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL n CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA Regular Meeting _ — •^"a March 26, 1984 _�i Mounds View City Hall _ 2401 Hwy. 10, Mounds View, MN 55112 The Mounds View City Council was called to order by 1. Call to Order Mayor McCarty at 7:30 PM on March 26, 1984. LinksS PRESENT: andCMayorlMcCarty,Blanchard, Doty, 2, Roll Call ALSO PRESENT: City Attorney Meyers, Clerk/Admini- strator aLi ey and Public Works/Community Development Director Thatcher. Park Director Anderson explained that a contact had Association to 3. Presentation GrantDe been made through the Groveland Park soliciting funds artment frc Honeywell approximately a year ago, that Mr. Dick Pickering was Hone ell for the City parks, and a representative from Honeywell, to make present, as to the City this evening. a presentation Mr. Pickering stated Honeywell feels this is a very to improving the City parks, and innovative approach that many of their employees at the New Brighton plant interested live in Mounds View, and Honeywell is very life and quality of work in Mounds in the quality of View. Mr. Pickering presented a check to Mayor McCarty for $2,000. Mayor McCarty and the Council thanked Mr. Pickering and Honeywell for their donation. ked that the Allegiance Concilmember Doty e of as said, beusaid. The Pled Motion/Second: Linke/Blanchard to approve the March 4. Approval of Minutes: minutes as corrected. March 12, 1984 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried There were no residents requests or comments from the 5. Residents Requests and floor. Comments from the Floor Mounds View City Council `� r^ March 26, 1984 Regular Meeting .� Page Two ------------------------------------------------------------------ ----- Clerk/Administrator Pauley advised that, due to a change in the publication date of the New Brighton Bulletin, notices will have to be in to the paper earlier, and the public hearings under Items C and D would have to be changed to April 23, 1984, and recommended that Item F be moved up to 8:00 PM on April 9, He explained that the change in publication will require the Council to set public hearings four weeks in advance now. Motion/Second: Doty/Hankner to approve the Consent Agen a, as amended, and waive the reading of the resolutions. 5 ayes 0 nays 6. Approval Consent E I a Motion Carried Motion/Second: Doty/Linke to approve the first reading 7. 1st Reading of o Or inance No. 357, adopting the 1983 long term Ord. No. 357 financial plan, and waive the reading. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion/Second: Doty/Blanchard to remove the item �HE the table. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried 8. Remove Fairchi Avenue P Improvema from Table Consideration of Planning Commission Recommendation Clerk/Administrator Pauley reviewed Staff's recom- mendation that the easement vacation for the Gale/Yost Addition be tabled until April 9, 1984, and that on April 2, the City Council consider development agreement requirement and project approval, which would indicate the portion on Fairchild necessary for public right-of-way for the proposed development. Motion/Second: McCarty/Hankner to continue the Gale/ Yost A ition preliminary plat until April 2, 1984, with the easement conditions to be considered on April 9, 1984. 5 ayes 0 nays Mayor McCarty closed the regular meeting and opened the Christopher Companies public hearing at 7:41 PM. Perry Bolin, the architect with Hammel, Green and Abrahamson, Inc., presented a drawing of the property Motion Carried Motion Carried 9. Public H� g Christoph Companies, Residential PU Mounds View City Council ;" ! March 26, 1984 Roc„jar Monh{nvn rage Three ---------------------------�d '�.----------------------------------- and project, and reviewed the proposed development. Mayor McCarty inquired if any of the north side of the project would touch the flood plain. Mr. Bolin explained that the flood plain is at 902, and the project will be between 903 and 903k when it is finished. Director Thatcher showed the existing drainage ditch on the property, and reported it was John Johnson's opinion that the ditch could be filled and there would still be adequate storage. Mr. Bolin presented a sketch of the flood plain area. Alex Levitan, 2051 Long Lake Road, New Brighton, asked what the rental range would be on the units. Mayor McCarty explained to Mr. Levitan that Mr. Anderson would not be required to answer that question as it had no bearing on the purpose of the public hearing. Lucy Levitan, 2051 Long Lake Road, New Brighton, asked if there would be common hallways in the buildings, and what the development timetable would be. Mr. Bolin showed on their drawing where there would be two separate entrances for each building, and there would be no common hallways. Mayor McCarty explained the Council would be dis- cussing the development timetable after the public hearing was concluded. Mayor McCarty closed the public hearing at 7:50 PM. Mayor McCarty reviewed that the applicant's request is for approval of a planned unit development, including a conditional use permit for the flood plain excavation, a flood plain use permit and a major subdivision. Clerk/Administrator Pauley reminded the Council that they had received Resolution No. 102-84, from the Planning Commission, recommending approval of the development. Mayor McCarty asked if the correspondence from the Commissioner of the DNR is needed prior to approval. amity Attorney Meyers advised that if the Council approves the project, the developer must enter into a development agreement, with which he must meet all the requirements, and that any motion made by the Council would be contingent upon the applicant entering into the development agreement. J I March 26, 1984 Mounds View City Council Page Four Regular Meeting ----------------------------------------- Motion/Second: McCarty/Linke to approve the proposal ro risT topTier Companies for a residential planned unit development, including a conditional use permit for flood plain excavation, flood plain use permit, and major subdivision, contingent upon compliance with the Mounds View Planning Commission Resolution No. 102-84, and successfully entering into a development agreement with the City of Mounds View. Motion Carried 5 ayes 0 nays Clerk/Administrator Pauley advised that approval is required from the DNR and he is not sure how long it could take. He added that he understands Mr. Anderson would like to start construction this year and build in phases. Director Thatcher advised the Council he plans to 10. and Approve Solici- tation of Bids solicite bids for the 1984 street sweeping sewer cleaning, televising, foaming and/or for 1984 Street Sweeping and sanitary grouting. He estimated the cost for the televising, $10,000 and $15,000, Sanitary Sewer cleaning and foaming to be between be $5,000, with the money Cleaning,Tele- and the street sweeping to vising,Foaming budgeted for both projects. and/or Greng Clerk/Administrator Pauley explained that the City foamed plans to televise lines this year that were as foam the lines that are scheduled in 1982, as well for 1984. Motion/Second: McCarty/Blanchard to approve the so Mcitation of bids for the 1984 street sweeping, televising, foaming and sanitary sewer cleaning, and/or grouting. Motion Carried 5 ayes 0 nays Director Thatcher reported he will be discussing 11. Report of Director ofPublic the T'CDA electrical analysis of the water system Works/ at the next agenda session. Community Dvlp. Director Thatcher reported the permit is due into the MPCA on April 1 for the backwash of water from filtration plants 2 and 3 into Rice Creek, which is a standard permit form. He added it is filled out and he wi:l be giving it to Mayor McCarty for his signature. Director Thatcher presented the Council with a • map of the City, with 14SA streets highlighted. He stated he is concerned with roads that are in CityibeingeSilvertion with the Lake Road betweenst road- in County RoadtHe and County Road I. I* also pointed out that MSA requires cuf•1, and b, .."•, M, Mounds View City Council = March 26, 1984pag a Five Regular Meeting 1 ____ ------------------------'- -i-------'-'------'-----',- Mayor McCarty questioned having to replace or upgrade the storm sewer for any additional runoff. Director Thatcher replied he has not yet determined if any upgrading would be required. Mayor McCarty stated he would like to know the total project cost to complete the project to where it would be acceptable to get the release of MSA funds. Councilmember Linke asked if the estimates given include sidewalks. Director Thatcher replied they did not, just the street, curb and gutter. Director Thatcher advised that bids should be accepted by June 1, and that he would have estimates ready for the next agenda session. It was agreed to discuss the issue further then. Attorney Meyers reported the City has received two proposals relative to the evaluation of the Anoka County/Blaine Airport master plan. He reviewed the proposals submitted by Transplan, Inc., and CH2M Hill, and advised that one more is expected. He recommended the City have all three firms come in, at the City's expense, and meet with them, and then make a decision on which firm to use. He also recommended that a budget be appropriated up to $10,000. Motion/Second: McCarty/Doty to authorize Staff to set up a special budget for the airport evaluation consultant, in the amount of up to �1 AO , from the contingency account. 5 ayes 0 nays 12. Report of Attorney Motion Carried Councilmember Blanchard reported the Planning 13, Reports of Commission has been very busy, and they are Councilmembers in the process of working on an ordinance regarding on -street parking, which they will be forwarding to the Council. Councilmember Doty had no report. Councilmember Linke reported he had attended the Ramsey County League dinner on March 21, which many Legislators attended, and it was a very informational meeting. Councilmember Hankner had no report. Mounds View City Council ° March 26, 1984 Regular Meeting cq ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Mayor McCarty reported he had received a letter from the Governor's office, inviting him to a meeting on April 2 regarding the appointment of the Met Council Chairman, and also to bring the Citys concerns to the attention of the Governor and his Staff. He asked that Clerk/Administrator Pauley attend in his place, as he had committments for that day that could not be rescheduled. Mayor McCarty also reported he had received a letter from someone interested in taking over a game room in the City, Clerk/Administrator Pauley advised that Attorney Meyers is reviewing it and will be giving the Council his opinion. Mayor McCarty reviewed what had happened at the meeting he attended in Blaine regarding the racetrack, and stated that he had taken no position and given no indication that the City had any position, pro or con. Clerk/Administrator Pauley advised he had received a memo today from Consulting Engineers Diversified, which was directed to the Racing Commission, in response to Mayor McCarty's comments at the meeting, Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported they had received 14. Report o a thank you note from the Paradise family, for the Administr r flowers. Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported he and represen- tatives from the City of Blaine had met and interviewed an applicant for the Energy Coordinator position, and he will be making a recommendation to the Council at their April 9 meeting. Clerk/Administrator Pauley asked the Council to set a date for Clean -Up Day. It was agreed to go with May 19, with Staff to make the arrangements and place an article in the newsletter. Motion/Second: Linke/Blanchard to adjourn the meeting 15. Adjournment at . 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Respectfully submitted, Donald F. Pauley e Clerk/Administrator Clt'11L X RESOLUTION NO. 1727 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION APPROVING POLICY STATEMENT ON THE ISSUE OF COMPARABLE WORTH WHEREAS, the issue of comparable worth or comparable work value which has been commonly defined as the value of work which is substantially equal i% the areas of skill, work effort, and responsibility has become a prominent national issue in the area of personnel administration; and WHEREAS, the Minnesota Legislature will be considering, during its 1984 Session, legislation which will mandate the establishment of equitable compensation programs by all political subdivisions in the State; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of the City of Mounds View to provide equitable compensation on the basis of comparable worth as evidenced by the wage adjustments made during 1984. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mounds View adopts the following Policy Statement on the Issue of Comparable Worth. POLICY STATEMENT ON COMPARABLE WORTH The City of Mounds View supports efforts by the State Legislature to address the issue of comparable worth at the local level of government and believes that cities and other local units are in the best position to address possible internal compensation inequities without exceeding local budget constraints. We further believe that comparable worth is more than a gender issue, being inextricably linked to the proposition that positions should be classified on the basis of job content and that wage rates for similarly classified positions should bear a rational relationship to the changing requirements of the marketplace. Wage rates for various classifications should be based on job content as well as an external relationship with the market- place. That content analysis must take into account internal equity comparisons, but also must allow for some comparison with the external job market. Further, it is the position of the City that such a comparable worth program cannot be successful as long as our communities are forced by law to set wage levels through negotiation or binding arbitration with labor organizations operating within the allowances of State labor relations laws. RESOLUTION NO. 1727 Page Two The City of Mounds View recommends that logislativc action be taken in 1984 to promote wage equity through a determination of comparable worth and that the following principles should guide this legislation: 1. Comparable worth programs :oust balance infernal pay equity with external supply and demand considerations. 2. Existing laws, which limit the power of local governmental units to implement wage structures based on comparable worth, including but not limited to collective bargaining and arbitration, should be modified accordingly. 3. Legislation should allow not only for the upgrading of certain classes of work in the wage structure, but also provide for decreases in pay where job evaluations indicate that is appropriate. 4. The State should shield or indemnify, including providing or paying for defense costs, any city which is sued for back pay as a result of the -•� implementation of the pay equity programs. 5. Legislation should allow a reasonable time to accomplish the implementation of each program. 6. The State should allow cities to choose the methods of analysis and implementation of pay equity programs. 7. Legislation should involve the adoption of a philosophy and definition of specific goals for pay equity programs. Adopted this 9th day of April, 1984. ATTEST: Mayor (SEAL) Clerk -Administrator J �rcm. % CONSENT AGENDA April 9, 1984 The Consent Agenda is a technique designed to expedite handling of routine and miscellaneous official business of the City Council. The entire Agenda may be adopted by the Council in one motion, The motion for adoption is non -debatable and must receive unani- mous approval. By request of any individual Councilmember, any item can be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed upon the Regular Agenda for debate. ITEM A. Adopt Resolution No. 1727 - Approving Policy Statement on the Issue of Comparable Worth ITEM B. Set Public Hearings for Comprehensive Rezonings per the Following Schedule: May 14, 1984 - Church Triangle - 7:45 pm - 2740 Highway 10 - 8:00 pm - 2 Lots North of - 8:15 pm 7190 Silver Lake Road - South Corner of Old - 8:30 pm Highway 8 & County Road H May 28, 1984 - Harstad Property, - 7:45 pm Silver Lake Road - Mid -American Auto - 8:00 pm - K Gas Station - 8:15 pm - Steve's Appliances - 8:30 pm June 11, 1984 - Import Auto - 7:45 pm - 7860 Groveland Road - 8:00 pm - Simon's Liquor - 8:15 pm - PAC Company - 8:30 pm - 2806/08 Highway 10 - 8:45 pm June 25, 1984 - 7801 Silver Lake Road - 7:45 pm - 7373 Knollwood Drive - 8:00 pm - 2752 County Road H-2 - 8:15 pm ITEM C. Authorize TKDA to Prepare Plans and Specifications for Well No. 1 Control Center and Pump Starter Replacement and Water System Control Supervisory and Control Panel Modifications and Administer Contracts at a Cost Not to Exceed $10,000 ITEM D. Set Special Council Meeting for 6:00 pm on Wednesday, April 11, 1984, to Discuss Findings on Anoka County Blaine Airport with Representatives of Coffman Associates CONSENT AGENDA April 9, 1984 • Page Two ITEM E. Adopt Resolution No. 1729 - Proclaiming April 21 and April 28, 1984 as "Arbor Days" and the Month of May as Arbor Month ITEM F. Authorize Staff to Proceed with the 1984 MSA Project as Outlined in a Memorandum from Public Works/Community Development Director dated March 27, 1984 ITEM G. Licenses for Approval Casino Night - Bel -Rae Ballroom - May 2, 1984 Mounds View Lions Club General - Expires 6/30/84 Belair Builders, Inc. - New Scott Meland Construction - New Nielsen -Miller Construction Co. - New Minnesota Custom Deck & Remodeling, Inc. - New Sign & Billboard - Expires 6/30/84 Arrow Sign Company - Renewal ITEM H. Adopt Resolution No. 1730 - Approving Just and Correct Claims Against City Funds 0 RESOLUTION NO. 1729 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF RAMSEY CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW RESOLUTION PROCLAIMING APRIL 21 AND APRIL 28, 1984 AS "ARBOR DAYS" AND THE MONTH OF MAY AS ARBOR MONTH WHEREAS, the Cities of Mounds View and New Brighton have entered into a joint powers agreement to provide urban forestry programs to the two respective cities, and WHEREAS, the Cities of New Brighton and Mounds View have been recognized as Tree City USA by the National Arbor Day Foundation and desire to continue their tree planting ways, and WHEREAS, the citizens of New Brighton and Mounds View are planting trees in Meadow Wood Park and Groveland Park, and WHEREAS, Arbor Day is a time to appreciate the contributions made by shade trees to our cities and to undertake a coordinated and cooperative effort to increase the shade tree population within our respective neighborhoods and parks. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mayors of the Cities of New Brighton and Mounds View do hereby proclaim April 21 & April 28, 1984 as "Arbor Days" in each of our respective cities. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that both cities hereby proclaim the month of May as "Arbor Month" and call upon the public spirited and foresighted citizens to assist in the planting of trees now for the enjoyment and use of future generations. Adopted this 9th day of April, 1984. ATTEST: Mayor (SEAL) Clerk -Administrator PE,SOI,UTION NO. 1730 4ITY OF HOUN!"O VIB7 COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA APPROVING JUST AND CORRECT CLAIMS AGAINST CITY FUNDS L 61pt- N W[FREAS, the City Council of Mounds View, pursuant to i.Iinnesota Statutes 412.241, has full authority over the financial affairs of the City and; VfHEREAS, The City Council has reviewed the claims numbers: 17282 through t7291 17292 through 17306 13285 through 13359 through in the amount of $ 7,749.46 in the amount of $ 62,973.47 in the amount of $ 12,230.40 in the amount of $ TOTAL AMOUNT OF CLAIMS PRESENTED $ 82,953.33 and has found said claims to be just and correct; (list of any exception) NO'N THEREFORE, be it resolved that the City Council of Mounds View hereby approved the attached lists of claims dated by the vote ayes nayes ATTEST; (SEAL) Mayor Clerk -Administrator ADDITIONAL DIRECT EXPENDITURES IIECK AMOUNT CLAIMANT PURPOSE 0282 $ 113.38 I,.M,C,I,T. - Insurance Trust Insurance 17283 84,10 Fidelity & Guaranty Life Ins. Insurance 17284 29475.94 State Treasurer - PERA Pensions 17285 3,422.35 Croup Health Plan, Inc. Insurance 17286 11.00 University of Minnesota Supplies, Bldg & Grds 17287 1,352.71 State Treasurer - Sec. Sec. Pensions 17288 152.18 ICMA Retirement Corporation Pensions 17289 30.00 Barbara McCarty Refund 17290 7.80 Minnesota Mutual Insurance 17291 100.00 Lauri Adams Wages $7,749.46 'CITY Cr MCLkrc I,rN f,H'CK� f C L T 011292 31,991,48 EC.,C be, pr��r Ec.Cc 6f.CC 25.f" 1J1.25 !2f.CC 25�?64,24 ?1�CC 1�Ehh,C7 i�;A5,9C ,aF,c hi.513.41 T S P r Y a 1. !. lTE 1 ' p T FIFST STATF f0Ali K CF "'r '' T GULAR L'. ,..,,�T. TIME CICH AFC SCFHICLItr GROG INSLRA ,F LAPRY r`CHFINE GROUP IRSU?At�LF �ILL IAr HA,GG( GFCLF INS LRANC, n WILLIAF 14ANSON GROLF IRSLRANE.E WALLACE t,pcTENSON GROUP TKSLRANCE � CA,Y 1,ARnELL f,FOLA INSLRANCE MET CENTER SUP FLIES ,OPErTING JOHN C JOHNSON OTHER PROCESSIONAL SEc-V ANC-A"41tiq CAARG": :AYA6CE ,.KKIC 7-ILFK PPCrfA° TNSTRUCT^`S PEIRC WASTE CONTROL CCMI+ METRO WASTE f(N T CONM FALL r,CaeRE SAL-FTFS,Tc'TTrPART-TIMr-- NO^TFEFrr LIGHTER rYFOTPC rESTIVITTES (2MNISSION STATE TREAS - P E R A PENSIONS I , L C iMAS1E 'Cr:vcFY EYFENOITURE$ SINCE W 1 rri'-fl ,i.ETING _ r .on CIT) r,F HCUNCS ITE'W 0 13 29? C 13301 _13?i4 013315 f 1 !' 7 :133C8 C1!3^4 , 238,[0 7 110. CC 53,55 123,4: 6: 26 �4.96 3.6E 295,00 n C C S 4 '1 T; a; Y A 9 L F C L A i` A 5 T ACC.UEASE SYSTEMS INC f.A :L F AN""S01 , tSSOr BACON ELECTRIC CA-ITrL ELECTRONICS CCMPUTIR CENTPAL O + C TRUCK INSTRU"ENTS FLEET SUPPLY + MACHINE CCFHF4 CEAFING CO K W GRAINGER INC ICMA 4,�9 J G AUTO SLPPLY 191.64 HARRY NEINEP,T JIHS OUILCIN; NATIJ ItA.65 KOKESH ATHL`TIC 0.25 LAYNE HINNESOTA CO G7.1n Mn SUrFLY CO 7C.00 HnPA 19.50 NETR.^, FONE. COMM 57,7r PTOLANr FRCOUCTS 251 CO HA' r, ITY MOMT ASSOC 27. C". PIN?! FIRE INC 11.6C NR✓A F96,°1 e �, 8'.LL TELEFHC14E CC 43,12 NEW BRIGHTON HONE tl!. 7 CP';ALJ FAULEY f,Ait ''4-17-n4 PAG. =' U .. - . a f. 2 SUPPL1;S,T?AFFIC CnT�OL REPAIRS, MaTIES REPAIRS, FCU04tENT NISC ;FFTC` SlIPPLIES SUFFLIES, VERICLE SUPPLIES, EOWHE!,T SUIFLI`cS, E001P11-,HT SUPPLIES, BLOGS+GRNCS BOOKS + CERIOOICALS " SUPFLIFSr CS AND-SUF'OLI S,,lPERATING STATIONERY JA NTTCP-SERVICE---._ SUPOLIES,OPERATING SUPFLIES, UTILITIES SUPFLTES UTILITTES — CCNFERENCES OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERV SUFFLTSS,CPERATTNG — MEHPERSHIFS SUPPLIES, UTILITIES SUPFLIF.S,CPFr'ATING CCf'NUNICATI( -S-TCLFFHONE SUPFLICS,OPEPATI!;G °T 1._....�-- lip IDY ®E 121 Y n u 1. I ;i T L'P IIl,; i L„ T C. L A f 4 .1 T O1?31t 27.89 FEPSI COLA OOTTLING CC 013312 28.63 POHF.R ERAKE ECUIPHEN T ^13313 '.""4.C� FA"SFY CCUbTY TRrASURF^+ 033314 2'..16' RATII FRIKTING "17?15 129.".tl FANELA S ROSE 1 ;1� ,7�, C ♦ T ,FFICE FRUCUCTS 01?317 1E4.Eg -SAFE-T-FLARE OF MINN IKC "!?•'.SA 115.:'.' CITY OF SHCREVIEM +1!?te C°1.45 CITY CF 'iFRING LAKr -A?K A131.?f B05,84 -` TEXCAS 013328 �t3!27 0 13 32A 013329 013332 C13333 rAuREF1. THIFLE11 BI.[^ NASTE MANAGEMENT OLAINE •aq,;... ZAf.KE INC 3L4(+ JUCY HNHA� 2C.CO MARCIA FORE 1C7.5C PAUL J0'';Sr`. 58.75 JUDITH JONES 120. CS LY .,;( '.; Trr. LL-: 17.44: CALF "C;'') f7.RC CANA PCMERLEAU 42.1. : tr'.' •Y iTTZ a U P° f 5 M R E F U N D NiSC OFFICE SVoFLIES A,4-SUP5LIES,CoEPATING _ SUPPLIES, ECrHc:r+T Sr,Ch' filC'EIt G3A••f,i� G A,:V-TRAFFIC ;IGI'A'-S - ELECT FESTIVITIES CDHHISSION--- SALARIFS,Ti.N7FRAPT TIME "'1SC OFFICE SLUPI:LtES RENTAL, EGUIT!!ENT SUFFLIES,CPFPoITING C^LLECTICr,S-OTHER AGCYS SU<<LIF;,,FERATTNG ANO-INVENTORY CCI;FERDNS ---- GUT•LIES, UTILITI REFLSE CCILEjTION SUP ;LIES,CPFk4TI)." 'RCGRAM INSTRUCT 'PS PROGRAM INSTPUCTORS PRCGRbF TtSTRUCT,iaS ----- PRfCNAr, I�ST°UrT'?S PROGRAM IASTRUCTORS PROGRAM INSTRUCTORS PROGRAM IFSTPUCT'^S — ---- r-2 l .° ■ ° mm -i.'. t. Y n a 1 .- ';4T� G4-1C-44 FAG'' 4 i;iv iF •CHrCP• �T•� 7 . r C u n T ,. � .• I ,; •I T O S E4 ; ] .s ^.13334 19676,:4 TKrt. ITMFc rROFE5SI0`JAL SERV 11375 11•. TIT, r r r4:4=iUTA HTSC OFFICE SUPPLIES , O!'33E 2ec,0,3 KEN' LELP PROGRAM INSTRUCTORS --� ,'I'0,•. ° C1J337 SE•C^ FICH4RC KOSKIt,E't R E F U N 1 _._-- '� go n133tF 1f,C; ACcIAN, CEPL'9E R E F U N D e � 01J339 166CO LEE STAUFFACHER R E FUN 0 x �� 4C,7C ;TAC (SGT RICHARD SAPP TP.AINING •` Iv 013340 n13v41 7.4,^-i %RS FACKLER -1 E F U N 0 n 150 Ou PAUL P•F.flELETN --DEPOSITS;- BUILDING — USAGE---, ,II, 013742 I]e . 013243 15,00 SPEILA CQNEIL R E F U N D _ 61i344 4q tRa hU''g 4° FuN51; ,];� ,] I - 013'45 4C,C7 JAMES COLE --REFUNDS 01334E 4C.C0 CALLAS TMCMoSDN REFUNDS - _ -- -- 313347 -- 67,5! kEY$iGnE SUPFLIi.S, VEHICLE. N, C13341 - 4_C64 GRIFFIS OXYGEN- - — -- SUPFCIEStOPE ATING — - N' +• 013349 59.75 NN OFFICE MACHINES REPAIRS, EOU FMF.NT n 013350 156 O. ! KI" FF.fnc R E F U N D 'r n ---033351- -----15:00 1A G_ LAVOT_ • 013352 40,06 FICHARO r'ALY REFUNDS _ i :] _.a1,S7 ,3 25,C7 JEFF"'Y 't0B 7 E F U t; 0 , 013354 .__ 129CO FELEN MOUNTAIN R E F U_nf 0_ fe B: [13355 15.00 DENNIS CCONNELL P E F U N 0 _ ;__�"'• i W5E 19, i5 0,IVENSITY OF MI _ 5c rA ;UF LIE S°OFERATINI,, 013357 4C.CC tEVIN CORIEN —�"1• 013358 24,CO PAT TRUEHART 4 F. F U 0 Id _ u m r n :I I :1 -Cl IV !F i'Cr ii''t. h C rL 'I 1 Y S p L F fATC C4-1L-fl4 PSG 5 r,Fii/;M h �• C � T f 1. d 1 Y h II I ° IJ F? .^ S C 7� Jr ^13359 �'.fi COUGLAc aRrES R E F U 1 �! 75 iif23C.7f' rF+F.Cti5 N:?ItIEB r i., TCTAL OF 90 CHECKS TCTAL 159203.E7 — o A — — 13'. n u n " G ie IT w i 11 i 71 : 75 f . • - ., 7e27 21 . 1 70 • 7c L t'1'l lit/ 1. ORDINANCE NO. 357 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE 19B3 LONG, -TERM FINANCIAL PLAN The Council of the City of Mounds View does hereby ordain: SECTION I. The 1983 Long -Term Financial Plan as presented on March 5, 1984 and on file in the Clerk Administrator's office for public review is hereby adopted. SECTION II. This ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days from and after the date of its publica- tion. Read by the Council of the City of Mounds View on the day of , 1984. V Read and passed by the Council of. the City of Mounds View this _ day of , 1984. ATTEST: (SEAL) MAYOR Clerk -Administrator td ro'L MEMO TO: Mayor and City CO '1 FROM: Clerk-Administrat DATE: April 4, 1984 SUBJECT: PLEASANT VIEW DRIVE STREETLIGHT PETITION Due to a staff oversight, a copy of the petition the City received for the location of streetlights on Pleasant View Drive was omitted from your April 2nd Agenda session packet. Attached to this memorandum please find a copy of that petition for your information. DFP/pf Attachment IV �rra.. 11C7PGL90l�'..".•_'a�-..�-•,-•9-"!•;yf••/A•.':.'�,'r7cl?s: e.:;:k,Cl!� z a,2Sfi1S:'•!�i!OiiY�!eH;ri;:. �. .-..--_..............�.I.......sl.�/.......��...-�r....rxn:.r'.•FFJ3fR11Ylb'�!1!1YIY.��.:•i•:.Itl1<!11!1w•1 .. r�l!1�.��w111.M'I.I..q.l .• Y, h Q r w MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Clerk -Administrator i DATE: April 9, 1984 SUBJECT: TASK FORCE ON CITY COUNCIL AND COMMISSION COMPENSATION The referenced subject matter has been placed on your agenda for formal action as I have been questioned by Councilmembers regarding the advisability of placing an article in the next City Newsletter, copy of article attached, without the formation of this Task Force being formally approved by the City Council. If after your discussions you determine that you do not wish to appoint this Task Force the proposed Newsletter article can be taken from the Newsletter before publication and an alternative article put in its place. Staff would appreciate Council direction on this matter. DFP/pf Attachment TACV cnDr` kcomGDCBTP_cnnr,qT THE MOUNDS VIEW CITY COUNCIL IS SEEKING RESIDENTS INTERESTED IN SERVING ON A FIVE MEMBER TASK FORCE WHICH WILL BE CHARGED WITH THE DUTY OF EVALUATING THE CURRENT LEVEL OF COMPENSATION PAID TO MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL, COMMISSIONS AND COMMITTEES AND SUB- MITTING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE MODIFICATION OF THE CURRENT COM- PENSATION SCHEDULE IF APPROPRIATE. ANY MOUNDS VIEW RESIDENT INTERESTED IN SERVING ON THIS TASK FORCE MAY OBTAIN AN APPLICATION FORM BY CONTACTING ADMINISTRATIVE SEC- RETARY PATT FRY AT 784-3055 OR STOPPING BY CITY HALL, 4- f MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council FRO14: Clerk -Administrator DATE: April 4, 1984 SUBJECT: GRIEVANCE OF MAINTENANCE WORKER LARRY DECHEINE In order to prepare you for the Step 3 appeal of the grievance of Public Works Maintenance Worker Larry Decheine, this memorandum is being written to provide you with a chronological listing of events, as well as any historical documentation that might be of assistance to you. As you may recall, Mr. Decheine was assigned to an evening shift, along with two MEED employees, pursuant to the provisions of the Labor Agreement with I.U.O.E. Local No. 49 which requires a seven day advance notice for the establishment of workdays different from the employee's normal eight hour workday. The purpose for this modification in the work schedule was to provide for more efficient maintenance of the City's pleasure skating and hockey rinks during the winter months. Late in the week of February 6, 1984 and during the weekend of February llth and 12th, significant changes to our winter weather conditions occurred which resulted in our inability to maintain suitable and acceptable ice conditions. On Tuesday, February 14th, Public Works Foreman Gary Kardell was advised that he was to direct Mr. Decheine to return to the normal workday schedule followed by other Public Works employees immediately as we were unable to justify the continuance of an evening shift due to the lack of other work which would justify his remaining on an evening schedule. We are allowed to make changes to work schedules without notice as Article 9.3 of the Master Labor Agreement provides that, "In the event that work is required because of unusual circumstances such as (but not limited to) fire, flood, snow, sleet, or breakdown of municipal equipment or facilities, no advance notice is needed." Mr. Kardell attempted on several occasions to contact Mr. Decheine by phone and ultimately left a written message for him, a copy of Mr. Kardell's report to me dated February 17, 1984 is attached. Due to Mr. Decheine's lack of response to the written directive from Mr. Kardell, I forwarded a letter to Mr. Decheine, dated February 16, 1984, advising that he was to meet with me to explain his lack of response. That meeting occurred as scheduled with Mr. Kardell, Mr. Decheine, and Shop Steward Wally Mortenson being present. As a result of that meeting it was my determination that Mr. Decheine was insubordinate in his actions and that a one day s suspension without pay would be appropriate. Copies of the February 16th and February 22nd correspondence communicating my determination to Mr. Decheine are attached. -1)- On March 14th the City received a written notice of grievance from Local No. 49, copy attached, and a meeting was held on the afternoon of March 22, 1984, with Business Agent Tim Connors, Public Works Maintenance Worker Larry Decheine, and Director of Public Works Steve Thatcher being present. During this meeting Mr. Connors outlined his understanding of the situation and the relief that was requested by the Union per his letter of March 13, 1984. I outlined the events as they were presented to me and my reasoning for the discipline given. Mr. Connors indicated he felt the discipline was too harsh and I advised him that I felt it was proper considering the severity of the indiscretion, past disciplinary action I have taken of a similar nature, and the City's Personnel Code that provides that insubordination is a dismissible violation. Mr. Connors advised me that this decision wasn't acceptable and they would continue to pursue the grievance if I did not provide the relief they requested, I advised that I would not, do so and the meeting was concluded. On March 27th the City received a letter from Mr. Connors, copy attached, requesting that the third step in the grievance proce- dure be waived, I responded on March 28, 1984, copy of letter attached, indicating that the waiving of the third step would be unacceptable and that it would.be placed on the Agenda for the April 9, 1984 Council Meeting. I would like to emphasize that I have reviewed this matter in as objective a manner as I can and it is my conclusion that although the procedures could have been better, Mr. Decheine was adequately advised that we had determined to cancel the evening shift and that he made minimal effort to indicate to the City that he would not be returning to the shift because he wished to have a three day weekend and a return to the day shift would interrupt his taking a three day holiday. If that request had been made to me I would have authorized him to take a day's vacation and resolved his concerns. Also, I would like to remind you that we did take action against Mr. Kardell by removing him from the position of Public Works Foreman for this and other issues that raised our concern regarding his ability to perform adequately in that position. It is my continued opinion that Mr. Decheine was insubordinate in his actions and that the disciplinary action I took against him was, if anything, mild in consideration of what the City's Personnel Code provides. should you have any questions regarding this matter prior to Monday night's meeting, please do not hesitate to contact me. DFP/pf Attachments r MEMO TO: Clerk -Administrator Pauley FROM: Public Works Foreman Kardell DATE: February 17, 1984 On February 14, 1984 I left a written message for Larry Decheine and the second shift Public Works employees informing them they were to return to the day shift on February 15, 1984 because Bruce Anderson was closing the rinks. I also attempted to phone Mr. Decheine twice in the afternoon on February 14, 1984 at 633-1373 and once at 784-9241, but I received no answer. I also drove by his residence on Greenfield Avenue on the afternoon of February 15, 1984 to see if his vehicle was there but did not see it. On February 15, 1984 when I arrived at the shop, I found the message I had left in the trash and still had not received a response from Mr. Decheine as to what his intensions were. He made no attempt, to my knowledge, to contact either myself or Bruce Anderson which he has done in the past. I again attempted to call him at the above phone numbers on February 16,_1984 at 8:30 a.m., 10:30 a.m. and 12:30,p.m. and again received no answer. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please feel free to contact me. :hank you. GK/bc February 16, 1984 Mr. Lawrence Decheine 590 - 12h Avenue N.W. New Brighton, MN 55112 Dear Mr. Decheine: Cif of VOR s iQw n A MSFV O^UN TV. P.1I WA SOT A 2401 HMIMAY 10 M0UNDSV16V,V,NN 55112 ,N47055 I have been advised by Public Works Foreman Gary Kardell that he has attempted to contact you by phone and stopping at both your mother's and former wife's homes over the last several days and has written you notes advising you that due to the drastic change in weather and our inability to maintain hockey rink ice, the City has cancelled your evening shift hours and instructed you to report to work during the day shift which is the normal hours for Public Works personnel. I have also been advised by Parks, Recreation and Forestry Director Bruce Anderson that he is aware that it is your intention not to report to the day shift until next Tuesday, �.. February 21st, and you have not offered either himself or Mr. Karde" an explanation for your independent determination that you will not abide by our instructions to commence working on the day shift immediately. in view of what would appear to be your insubordinate actions in refusing to follow proper directive, I would ask that you meet with me in my office at 2:00 p.m. on Friday, February 17th. Should this time be inconvenient for you, you may contact me and make arrange- ments for another time on that same date for us to meet. Pursuant to State law and labor contract requirements, be advised that the results of this meeting could possibly result in disciplinary action and, therefore, you have the r`_ght to have a union repre- sentative present with you. I will expect you to either appear at the time requested or contact me and make arrangements for a meeting at a different time on Friday, February 17th. DFP/pt cc: Public works Foreman Gary Kardell; Parks, Recreation and Forestry Director Bruce Anderson; Union Steward Mayor and City Coui ; Will" W.J' 41 Wally Mortenson; cif 0f vor S ipw NAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA 2401 HIGHWAY 10 MOUNDS VIEW, MINN 55112 78. 3055 February 22, 1984 Mr. Larry Decheine 590 - 12th Avenue N.W. New Brighton, MN 55112 Dear Mr. Decheine: As I indicated to you during our meeting on February 17th, I have reviewed the matter of your not abiding by or responding to the directive you received from Public Works Foreman Gary Kardell to return to the day shift on February 15th. After reviewing the matter in detail, I have determined the following: 1. The directive was proper in that the City is not required to provide seven (7) days notice for a change in shift schedule when unusual circumstances exist. In this case, the unpredicted change in weather and temperature made it impossible to maintain the ice at the City's skating and hockey rinks (the main reason for establishing a night shift in the first place) and no other meaningful work was available for persons on a night shift schedule. 2. Although the City Is efforts could have been better in informing you of the shift change, you put forth no effort in complying with the directive and minimal effort advising us of the reasons why you would not comply. 3. Your actions have been insubordinate by not complying with a properly issued directive. As a result, it was my recommendation to the City Council, with which they concurred, that both parties, yourself and Mr. Kardell, are at fault and that appropriate disciplinary action be taken against each of you at a level consistent with the severity of the indiscretion. Therefore, you are hereby advised that as a result of your insubordinate actions you will be suspended on Friday, February 24th, for one working day without pay. Sincerely, VATIKIne 17TV17 DFP/pf cc: Public Works Foreman Gary Kardell Mayor and City Council Union Steward Wally Mortenson City Accountant Mary Tatarek Is 0 rFRED P. DERESCHUK. Pres:denl JOHN J. LACKNER, Vice Presldenl JOHN M. SCHOUVELLER RMordinecorresnunding Secrelary JON R. PENDZIMAS, Tmaswer international Union of Operating Engineers LOCAL UNION NO. 49, 49A, 498, 49C, 49D and 49E MINNE50TA - NORTH DAKOTA - SOUTH DAKOTA ROBERT F. PUERINGER, Business Manager -Financial Secretary 2829 ANTHONY LANE SOUTH — MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55418 Plane: 1612) 788 9441 March 13, 1984 Mr. Don Pauley, City Manager City of Moundsview 2401 Highway 10 Moundsview, MN 55112 RE: GRIEVANCE OF MEMBER LARRY DECHEINE Dear Mr. Pauley: Alllllaled WIN A.F.L..t•I.O. This is the second step in the grievance procedure between the International Union of Operating Engineers, Local No, 49, and the City of Moundsview, on behalf of member Larry Decheine. NATURE OF GRIEVANCE Mr. Decheine was suspended for one (1) day, Friday, February 24, 1984. ARTICLE VIOLATED ARTICLE XIV - DISCIPLINE: The EMPLOYER will discipline employees only for just cause. RELIEF REQUESTED That Mr. Decheine be reinstated with all back pay and benefits, and the letters dated February 16th and February 22nd be removed from his file. I am willing to meet with you at any time to further discuss this matter. Respectfully, INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS, LOCAL N0. 49 ;�� /(� lJt.��,� Tim R. Connors Area Business Representative TRC/da opeiu d12 afl-cio International Union of Operating Engineers LOCAL UNION NO. 49, 49A, 49B, 49C, 49D and 49E MINNESOTA - NORTH DAKOTA • SOUTH DAKOTA N O� Ow iRED P. DER ESCHUn, Plelidenl JOIIN J. LACKNER, Vite Ple1MOn( JOHN M SCHOUVELLER POceldmB-Coffelper41n5 SWOfefy 4 JON R. PLND211AAS, Tlealumf y e ROBERT F. PUERINGER, Business Manager -Financial Secretary 2821) ANTHONY LANE SOUTH— MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55418 Phone: (612) 28a9141 March 26, 1984 CERTIFIED MAIL NO. 316999 Mr. Don Pauley, City Manager City of Moundsview 2401 Highway 10 Moundsview, MN 55112 AfilWl,d with A.f.L.0 �..0�e RE: Grievance of Member Larry Decheine Dear Mr. Pauley: This is the third step in the grievance procedure between the International Union of Operating Engineers, Local No, 49, and the City of Moundsview, on behalf of member Larry Decheine. NATURE OF GRIEVANCE Mr. Decheine was suspended for one (1) day, Friday, February 24, 1984. ARTICLE VIOLATED ARTICLE XIV - DISCIPLINE: The EMPLOYER will discipline employees only for just cause, RELIEF REQUESTED That Mr. Decheine be reinstated with all back pay and benefits, and the letters dated February 16th and February 22nd be removed from his file. I request that we skip the third step and go directly to Mediation. Respectfully, INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS, LOCAL NO. 49 iI Tim R. Connors TRC/da Area Business Representative uP:iu ui2 afl-cio GATEWAY 1 TO THE NORTH March 28, 1984 Cif of VOP s 4 ❑AMSTY COUNTY, MINNE SO TA 2401 111GHWAY 10 MOUNDS VIEW, MINN. 55112 1545055 Mr. Tim R. Connors Area Business Representative International Union of operating Engineers Local No. 49 2829 Anthony Lane South Minneapolis, MN 55410 Re: Grievance of Maintenance Worker Larry Decheine Dear Mr. Connors: This office is in receipt of your certified letter dated March 26, 1984 filing the third step in the grievance procedure between the International Union of Operating Engineers, Local No. 49, and the City of Mounds View on the issue of disciplinary action taken against Maintenance Worker Larry Decheine in February of 1984. In your letter, Mr. Connors, you request that the third step in the grievance procedure, which is a review of the matter by the City Council, be waived and that we proceed directly to Step 4 which is a submittal of the grievance to the Minnesota Bureau of Mediation Services. It is my desire, Mr. Connors, that this grievance be handled in the procedures set forth by Article 6.14 of the Master Labor Agreement and, therefore, your request that the third step in the grievance process be waived is rejected. This grievance will be submitted to the City Council for their consideration at their next regular meeting, April 9, 1984, which commences at 7:30 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, at which time you and Mr. Decheine may be present to state your position before the City Council. -z- Should you have any questions or require any information regarding the scheduling of this item on the Council's April 90 meeting agenda, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, CITRF MOUNDS VIR� Do ld F. Pauley Cler -Administra DFP/pf cc: Mayor and City Council Mr. Cy Smythe, Labor Relations Associates Parks, Recreation and Forestry Director Bruce Anderson Shop Steward Wally Mortenson Maintenance Worker Larry Decheine CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW CITY COUNCIL AGENDA SESSION April 16, 1984 7:00 p.m. 1, Status report on Storm Water Management Analysis from John Johnson. 2. Consideration of staff memorandum regarding Energy Coordinator position. 3. Consideration of staff memorandum regarding Citizen Survey, 4. Consideration of staff memorandum regarding amusement center and device license fees. 5. Consideration of modifications to Municipal Code Chapter 100, Intoxicating Liquors. 6. Consideration of staff memorandum regarding moment of silent meditation. 7. Consideration of staff memorandum regarding Povlitzki's Off 10. 8. Consideration of staff memorandum regarding hiring of new police officer. 9. Consideration of staff memorandum regarding Metropolitan Council A-95 notification of Metropolitan Airports Commission notice of intent to apply for Federal funds. 10. Consideration of staff memorandum regarding Code -A -Phone capa- bilities. 11. Consideration of staff memorandum regarding 1983 Water and Sewer Funds budgeted contingency. 12. Consideration of staff memorandum regarding Water and Sewer System Maintenance and Capital Improvement Program Summary. 13. Consideration of staff memorandum regarding sources of funding for possible lawsuit regarding Anoka County Airport expansion. 14. Consideration of staff memorandum regarding Pinecrest Park Development Propoal. 15. Consideration of staff memorandum regarding Gale/Yost Addition. 16. Consideration of staff memorandum regarding Povlitzki's Off 10 Walleyball Court request. AGENDA SESSION April 12, 1984 Page Two 17. Consideration of staff memorandum regarding bus reroute request Adams and Bronson Streets. 18. Consideration of staff memorandum regarding ground reservoir and Tower 2 project bids. 19. Consideration of staff memorandum regarding street soil boring and sanitary sewer televising bids. 20. Consideration of staff memorandum regarding informational hearing on MSA street projects. 21. Consideration of staff memorandum regarding 1984 Street Sweeping bids. 22. Consideration of staff memorandum regarding Programmed Land fill permit request. 23. Consideration of staff memorandum regarding Tree City USA Award. J MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Clerk-Administrato DATE: April 10, 1984 SUBJECT: ENERGY COORDINATOR As you know, we, along with the City of Blaine, have been attempting to locate an individual to serve as the Energy Coordinator for the cities of Mounds View and Blaine under our recently organized Energy Conservation Program. Attached please find a letter of application and resume from Ms. Rita Docken, the only applicant for the position. Ms. Docken will be graduating from the Red Wing Energy Education Center in June and was recently interviewed by myself and representatives for the City of Blaine and found to be most qualified for the position. Staff would recommend Council authorization for the hiring of Ms. Docken for a six month period, with primary funding to be provided by the State MEED Program and supplementary wages of $2.73 per hour paid by the cities of Mounds View and Blaine. The MEED salary with the supplement from the cities of Mounds View and Blaine would result in an annual compensa- tion of $14,000 per year. RECOMMENDATION: Authorization to hire Ms. Rita Docken for a six month period commencing May 14, 1984 as Energy Coordinator at a base wage of $6.73 per hour supplemented by the MEED Program at a rate of $4.00 per hour, with the supplementary salary of $2.73 per hour being paid for on a 50% basis by the City of Blaine. DFP/pf Attachment 722 west 4th, Red Wing, MN (612) 388-1465 'firth 7, 1984 Mr, Donald P. Pauley Clerk Administrator City of Mound's View Ramsey County, Minnesota 2401 Highway 10 Mound's View, MN 55112 Dear Mr. Pauley: Apt. 2B 55066 r,I�iR t984 RECEIVED CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW I am very excited about the Mound's View/Blaine Energy Coordinator position and would like to take this opportunity to apply for the position. I am submitting my resume for your consideration. I am dedicated to conserving energy in the residential, commercial and industrial sectors and view the energy coordinator position as a vehicle to this end. The energy training I have received at the Red Wing Energy Education Center has prepared me technically for this position and has offered me the opportunity to write laboratory reports for chemistry, physics, thermodynamics and biomass. Additional verbal skills have been acquired in speech, human relations, and technical communications courses. During the past year I have been involved with the City of Red Wing Energy Conservation Committee, acting as liaison between the committee and members of the IlLst End Historical Neighborhood Association, a local organization which has been designated as the pilot area for a residential weatherization project. I was chosen for this position because of my famil- iarity with the Minneanolis/Minnegasco Neighborhood Energy Workshop program, and my interest in adapting this program to Red Wing's energy needs. I am the presiding officer of the Red fling Chapter of the Minnesota Solar Energy Association and am responsible for arranging speakers for our monthly meetings, preparing press releases and promoting the organization. I look forward to discussing these projects with you soon, and am available for an interview at your convenience. Enclosure Sincerely, tat Rita Docken IrJJ / (u,v�f �,• , 1,,e1 , ��a ,G ��„r � • pAs RITA M. DOCKEN Current Address 722 {Vest 4th, Apt. 2B Red Wing, hire 55066 (612) 388-1465 Objective Permanent Address RR 2, Box 118 Galesville, WI 54630 (603) 582-2034 Seeking a position as an energy technician in the energy conserva- tion/renewable energy field. Education Red Wing Energy Education Center, Red Wing, MN 1982-84 Certificate of Proficiency - Alternative Energy Information 2100 hours of technical and academic training in energy conservation, alternative and renewable energies, and conventional energy pro- duction and management systems. - Participated in the construction and design of a blower door to measure air infiltration rates. - Participated in the construction of a methane digester. - Class representative in student senate and student advisory committees. Western Wisconsin Technical Institute, La Crosse, WI 1972-74 Associate Degree in Medical Secretarial Science University of Wisconsin - La Crosse, La Crosse, WI 1971-72, 1974 Basic studies and introductory coursework in business Work Experience Scheduled surgeries and handled of any of the 90 secretaries in doctor clinic. the duties and responsibilities their absence for this 120+ Estimated costs and determined completion dates in a small printing office. Aided in production when needed. Developed and instituted word processing programs. Streamlined procedures, initiated and implemented plans for coordinating various departments with the word processing department resulting in time and dollar savings. Demonstrated the IIIPI 6/450 computer, its capabilities and programs, to office visitors and employees. Acted as liaison between customers and production staff in a publishing company. Attained regular promotions within this corporation by requesting and receiving added responsibilities. Created and maintained a comfortable atmosphere for customers and sales representatives. Activities and Organizations Minnesota Solar Energy Association - Red Wing Chapter Chairperson 1984, member 1983 American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air Conditioning Engineers - Red Wing Chapter Secretary/Treasurer 1983-84, member 1982-83 Red Wing Energy Conservation Committee, 1984 First Annual National Superinsulation Conference, 1983 National Conference American Solar Energy Society, 1983 Minnesota ASHRAE Conference, 1983 References References will be furnished upon request. 41, 3 MEMO TO: Mayor and City Coun i FROM: Clerk -Administrator DATE: April 10, 1984 SUBJECT: CITIZEN SURVEY Attached please find a copy of the City of New Brighton's report on the results of a Citizens Survey performed during 1982. This item has been discussed by Department Heads at the request of Parks, Recreation and Forestry Director Anderson. The Department Heads, after reviewing the material and obtaining information from Mr. Anderson regarding the cost of this project, felt that a similar project for the City of Mounds View would be of significant benefit in that it would provide us with citizens perspective on City services which would be most beneficial during the budgetary process in evaluating the perceived value of our services. Should Council wish to undertake this project, staff would recommend that we be authorized to seek proposals from outside consultants for the preparation of the document as well as the compilation of the data and development of a summary report. We would also, during the time we are seeking pro- posals from consultants, identify those organizations that would be interested in helping the City perform this survey as it would be a labor intensive project requiring door-to-door interviews. Finally, during this time staff would also propose that we prepare a proposed list of issues to be included in the survey for Council review prior to submittal to a consultant for preparation of the actual survey form. Your direction in this matter would be appreciated. DFP/pf Attachment v , 4- MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Clerk-Administrato DATE: April 10, 1984 SUBJECT: AMUSEMENT DEVICE LICENSE FEES As you may recall, you individually received letters from Mr. S. G. Nilva,on behalf of the National Amusement Company, Inc., questioning the validity of the City's license fees for amusement centers and devices ($100 per year for amusement center - $50 per year for each amusement device) on the basis that our license fees are too high,citing State law and recent court action against the City of West St. Paul. In response to that letter I requested a legal opinion from City Attorney Richard Meyers, copy attached, who advised in a letter dated March 30, 1984 that the West St. Paul case, "... has little legal impact, except against West St. Paul and in the jurisdiction where the case was heard." City Attorney Meyers further states, "A regulatory license fee can be levied if the amount of the fee is reasonably related to the probable costs of inspection and ' administration, otherwise any excess would be improper taxation." City Attorney Meyers has indicated that if the City of Mounds View feels that our present license fee structure for amusement centers and devices is reasonable and related to the actual costs exper- ienced by the City of Mounds View for administration and inspection that these fees should remain,and staff would advise that after reviewing these fees we feel that they are indeed valid. RECOMMENDATION: Staff would recommend authorization to send a letter to the National Amusement Company, Inc. advising them that we have reviewed our license fees and find them to be reasonably related to administration and inspection costs. DFP/pf Attachment RICHARD MEYERS, P. A. ATTOSNEY AT LAW ITf. Ya NUA AHNUa ST. PAUL• NINENSOTA 05112 p li, .ab nm 1,.. 1 � _ 0, Q, �Q / March 30, 1984 �lny. A\� Mr. Donald F, Pauley Clerk -Administrator City of Mounds View Mounds View, Minnesota 55112 Ref Licensing Dear Mr. Pauley: The City has a general power to require licenses for the protection of the public health, safety and welfare under its general police A regulatory license fee can be levied if the amount of the fee is reasonably related to the probable costs of inspection and admin- istration, otherwise any excess would be improper taxation. Generally, the city councilts determination of the license fee will not be disturbed by the courts since great weight will be given to a legislative declaration. Lyons -v- Minneapolis, 241 Minn 439. 63 NW2d 585 (1954). The District Court decision in the West St. Paul case, as presented in summary form by National Amusement Company restates the basic law. Since this case was not heard by the Minnesota Supreme Court it actually has little legal impact, except against West St. Paul and in the jurisdiction where the case was heard. It of course would be cited by a litigant if said litigant thought it would influence another judge in another court. Yours RM/amm ,.-, MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Clerk-Administrato DATE: April 11, 1984 SUBJECT: MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 100, INTOXICATING LIQUORS, MODIFICATIONS Pursuant to your direction at the Agenda Session on April 2, 1984 staff would suggest the following modifications to Municipal Code Chapter 100 regulating intoxicating liquors: 1. Amend 100.01 by adding Subdivision 7 which would read as follows: Subdivision 7. Food. Food, as the term is used herein, shall mean a menu consist ng of not less than three separate and distinct entrees, complete with vegetable, salad, rolls or bread, and a selection of beverages. 2. Amend 100.02, Subdivision 4, to read as follows: Subdivision 4. Sunday Sales. S ecial on -sale licenses for the sale of intoxicating liquor on Sunday separate from a regular "on -sale" license issued pursuant to Section 100 02 subdivision 2, of this Cha ter shall be issued to hotels, restaurants or clubs as defined in Section 100.01, Subdivision 1, and which have facilities for serving not less than 30 guests at one time. 3. Amend 100.05 by renumbering the current Subdivision 3 to Subdivision 4 and adding the following as the new Subdivision 3: Subdivision 3. Hearing. No issuance of a new license or transfer or renewal of an existing license for the sale of intoxicating liquor "on -sale", "off -sale", Sunday sale or "on -sale wine" shall be hereafter granted by the Council until a public hearing has been conducted by the Council after published notice in the official newspaper at least 10 days in advance of the hearing. The above three items should fulfill all of the requirements you stated you desired to see at the April 2nd Agenda Session, however, these proposed revisions have not been reviewed by the City Attorney and,should you find them acceptable, will need to be submitted to him for his review and comment prior to their formal adoption. If you find these revisions acceptable, please advise and I will forward them to City Attorney Meyers for his review. DFP/pf MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Clerk-Administrato DATE: April 11, 1984 SUBJECT: MOMENT OF SILENT MEDITATION In view of the moment of silent meditation that occurred at the April 9th Council Meeting immediately after the Pledge of Allegiance, staff would appreciate Council's direction as to whether or not you desire to have this item on the Agenda as a regular item after the Pledge of Allegiance. If this is your desire, staff will immediately commence including this as a regular item on the Agenda. As a result of direction given to staff at the April 2nd Agenda session, staff performed a survey of all cities over 5,000 in population in the Metro area to determine their practices with respect to this issue. Attached for your information are the results of the survey which indicates that of the 37 cities contacted, only eight have some form of prayer or silent meditation at their meetings. DFP/pf Attachment City Prayer or Moment of Silence Brooklyn Center Prayer - different church each time (Pastor) Burnsville Prayer - different church each time (Pastor) Columbia Heights Prayer - different church each time (Pastor) Coon Rapids Prayer - Mayor Maple Grove Prayer - 1st meeting of year by Pastor No. St. Paul Prayer - different church each time (Pastor) Plymouth. Moment of Silence - Mayor Vadnais Heights Prayer - different church each time (Pastor) The following Cities do not have Prayer or a Moment of Silence Anoka Ham Lake Apple Valley Maplewood Arden Hills Minnetonka Plaine Mound Bloomington New Brighton Brooklyn Park Ramsey Cottage Grove Roseville Eagan St. Anthony East Bethel St. Louis Park Eden Prairie St. Paul Eden Valley Shakopee Edina Shoreview Fridley Spring Lake Park Golden Valley West St. Paul White Bear Lake I MEMO TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Mayor and City C, Clerk-Administra April 11, 1984 POVLITZKI'S OFF 10 �,L 7 During and after the hearing on Povlitzki's Off 10 at your meeting on April 9, 1984 staff was directed to respond to two specific questions which resulted from the testimony given at this hearing. These questions are: 1. What was the specific knowledge of staff regarding Mr. Povlitzki's intentions to convert his operation from a restaurant to a restaurant/bar operation? 2. Which staff member authorized Mr. Povlitzki to operate on Sundays with a "weiner wheel"? First of all, prior to responding to these specific questions I would like to take the opportunity to point out that the testimony given at this hearing by Mr. Povlitzki was less than factual in _ nature. Also, as his legal counsel at this meeting had no specific conversations with City staff prior to the hearing, any comments ( made by that individual were based on information provided to him by Mr. Povlitzki and did not necessarily reflect the City's position in this matter. In response to the first question, staff was aware that Mr. Povlitzki intended to make modifications to the former Anchor Inn facility in order to provide an area for a bandstand and dance floor, as well as the removal of non -load bearing walls which separated the dining areas and the addition of a second bar at the west end of the facility. We were also assured by Mr. Povlitzki, however, that it was his intention to serve food although he did emphasize that it would be on a different basis than that of the Anchor Inn as he did not wish to serve that type of food and would be remodeling the kitchen, significantly reducing its size and removing existing equipment and installing entirely new kitchen equipment. Staff was not aware of Mr. Povlitzki's intention to auction off the existing kitchen equip- ment prior to his ordering new equipment and the delay that resulted from such action until we were advised by Councilmember Linke of his noticing an advertisement in the Minneapolis Star & Tribune for such auction. At that time we contacted Mr. Povlitzki, learned that the auction was in progress, and were advised of his plans to purchase new equipment from the proceeds of the auction and install a kitchen within four weeks of the sale of the existing equipment. -1)- I would like to emphasize that staff was aware of the modifications that Mr. Povlitzki proposed to make to his physical plant, however, we were also aware of and emphasized in our conversations with Mr. Povlitzki that it was his intention to maintain a restaurant operation in the facility although on a different basis than that previously operated by the Anchor Inn. In response to the second question, once staff became aware of the fact that Mr. Povlitzki was not serving meals while being open on Sundays and Council direction that he begin the service of food immediately, I personally met with Mr. Povlitzki after communicating to him a letter dated January 4, 1984, copy attached, that he was in violation of the City's Intoxicating Liquor Code by selling liquor on Sunday without it being in conjunction with the sale of food. During our meeting, which occurred on approximately the same date, January 4, 1984, I advised Mr. Povlitzki of the absolute necessity that he commence serving food in his facility immediately even though he was remodeling the facility. At no time did I authorize Mr. Povlitzki to operate a "weiner wheel" only. Mr. Povlitzki and I discussed the need for him to offer a variety of food which could include hot dogs, polish sausages, frozen pizzas, and other microwave type foods which would provide an assortment of choices to his customers and could include entrees which are available for commercial use and can be cooked in a microwave. I was not aware that Mr. Povlitzki chose to ignore the basics of our conversation and operate a weiner wheel only until advised of that fact by Mayor McCarty. If any mistake was made by me during the process of handling this matter with Mr. Povlitzki it was that I took his word for it and expected him to serve a variety of foods without taking the time to check on his operation personally and insure that he was meeting the intent of the law if not the letter of the law. I would hope that the above information adequately responds to your two questions and assures you that staff acted in the best interests of the City. Should you have any further questions or require additional information, please advise me. DFP/pf Attachment M GATEWAY January 4, 1984 Mr. Richard Povlitzki Povlitzki's on 10 2400 County Road H-2 Mounds View, MN 55112 Re: Liquor Code Violations Dear Mr. Povlitzki: C►� of VOR S iew RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA 2401 HIGHWAY 10 MOUNOSVIEY/,MINN 55112 18a0055 ^ It has been brought to my attention by residents of the community and Mayor McCarty that since your taking over the business formerly known as the Anchor Inn at 2400 County Road H-2 you have been selling intoxicating liquor without food being served in conjunction with the sale of liquor. The sale of liquor at your licensed establishment is in violation of the City's intoxicating liquor codes for the following reasons: 1. Your application for the transfer of a liquor license from Mr. Louis C. Gydesen to your name was approved by the Mounds View City Council on December 1, 1983 with the understanding that the establishment would continue to function with its primary purpose being that of a restaurant. This was further confirmed when you purchased a restaurant license from the City of Mounds View during its regular business hours on December 30, 1983. Chapter 100.01 of the City's Municipal Code adopts the definition for a restaurant as outlined under Minnesota Statute 340.07, Subdivision 14, copy attached, which states that a restaurant means an establishment, "...having appropriate facilities for the serving of meals, and where in consideration of payment therefore, meals are regularly served at tables to thE. general public .... 11 2. ordinance No. 344 amending Chapter 100 of the Municipal Code, adopted by the Mounds View City Council on July 25, 1983, provides for the sale of liquor by licensed on -sale establish- ments on Sundays between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 12:00 Noon only when such sale is in conjunction with the service of food. A copy of Ordinance No. 344 is attached for your information. -z- In view of the fact that the City Council has authorized no change in the use of the former Anchor Inn facility, the City will expect you to operate this facility as a restaurant and abide by all of the provisions of the City's liquor code as outlined above or the City will be forced to review your on -sale liquor and restaurant licenses in view of your noncompliance with our codes. You are hereby advised that you will be expected to comply with the requirement that you operate the facility as a restaurant, with liquor sales being secondary to that function, and to cease all liquor sales until you are able to commence food sales. Sincerely, DFP/pf cc: Mayor and City Council City Attorney Richard Meyers Police Chief Tim Ramacher Enclosures M MEMO TO: Mayor and City Counc r FROM: Clerk-Administrat DATE: April 11, 1984 SUBJECT: METROPOLITAN COUNCIL A-95NOTIFICATION OF METROPOLITAN AIRPORTS COMMISSION NOTICE OF INTENT TO APPLY FOR FEDERAL FUNDS Attached please find correspondence received by this office from the Metropolitan Council under the A-95 review program relating to the Metropolitan Airports Commission notice of intent to apply for Federal funds for Master Plan IB Development of the Anoka County -Blaine Airport. You will note from the correspondence from the Metropolitan Airports Commission that the Commission intends to apply for $1.7 million dollars in Federal funds for Phase IB improvements to the Anoka County -Blaine Airport which are comprised of the movement of the existing north/south runway 950 feet to the north, extension of the east/west runway to a total length of 4,000 feet, and expansion of the hangar construction area. Should the Council wish to do so, a letter can be submitted to the Metropolitan Council describing the effects this project might have on our community, however, it is unlikely that the Metropolitan Council will take any action to prohibit this development as they did approve the Master Plan which called for this work. Staff would request Council direction in this matter. DFP/pf Attachment 7,WIN CIT, t. 300 Metro Square Building, 7th Street and Robert Street, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101 Area 012, 291.0 59 April 9, 1984 To Whom It May Concern: RE: Metropolitan Airports Commission Notice of Intent to Apply for Federal Funds Anoka County -Blaine Airport Master Plan IB Development Received 03/20/84 Metropolitan Council Referral File No. 12056-1 The Metropolitan Council has received an application for federal ' funds to accomplish the above referenced project. The federal procedures for review of these applications require that any potentially affected units of government, neighborhood organi- zations, groups, and human rights commissions be notified of the project and given an opportunity to comment. The interest of your community groups should be expressed by means of a letter describing the effect the project might have on your community or the type of additional information you would like to receive. Upon receipt of a notice of your interest, if any, it is i;cu itan l to arrange a conference withthe mtapplicant for *Upon the rthe lbenefit uofiall interested parties. If you desire to review the application, copies are on file at the Metropolitan Council and in the offices of the applicant. Sincerely, MET OPOLITAN COUNCIL �v hn Rutford / Referral Coordinaeor JR/ch J An Age"UY Crtimsd W nnnrifinnt0 thr • ^' ' ' utd Dav„Inpntont of tlto Twin Cities Matropolitun Area Comprising: Anoka CoOhty"Y°It",° Cuw,t, ialtutM (' „owv Iluu nupin Coumy .11omsey r...,nty u Scott f.,unq Wn.nmglnn County 0 P61A Mq.. METROPOLITAN AIRPORTS CONIMISSIO(!J":;.'''�� P. 0. BOX 1700 • TWIN CITY AIRPORT • MINNESOTA SS11T ,. OFFICE OF EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR • PHONE (612) 726.1892, • I r February 23, 1984 Mr. Thomas Harren Minnesota Dept. of Energy, Planning & revelopaent 100 Capitol Square 550 Cedar Street St. Paul, M 55101 RE: Metropolitan Airports CCITmission Capital Improvement Programs - 1984-1985 Dear Mr. Harren: MEl'ROP.OL' M MUM Ream F10E MIL4ZO' The Metropolitan Airports Canmission, at its February21st meting, approved the remaining 1984 and proposed 1985 Capital Improvement Program and authorized submission of the necessary docwmntation to your agency for A-95 review. Enclosed are two copies each of Form 505, Notification of Intent to 'Apply for Federal Aid. for Minneapolis -St. Paul International, St. Paul Downtown and Anoka County -Blaine Airports. Attached to each form is a brief description of the projects and a sketch indicating the area where construc- tion activity will occur. You will note that the construction consists primarily of projects of an, internal nature that will have no affect outside airport boundaries. We are requesting you review the projects at your earliest gonvenie'nce in order that your comments can be submitted with our pidapplications for Federal Aid. If you desire further information, do not hesitate to contact our office. Veryttruly yours, Nigel D. Finney Director of Planning & Engineering /jr enc. M C--:ICE L^C A;ION—f'1:; ;SIh AVE. SO —WEST TER"":41 :•.._SA:nT A:OL I;!•ER S: TI C:.AL AIRPORT a Farm SOS 00 Slaw Lteadlnyldoaw I.Y. i • iG NOT USE I Plena Road IM11-1a VOnt on Ib back or Inn lo,m. P6.1 nl Trw Y Sue of Mdnnnau - - nnl v IA O CtnCO+I —a In NOTIFICATiON G r iNi Eir, dv %. 7777".•�.. i tv;ETacPouTnri ccu�r" I IU I I Apptitanl P101"I Name 12 7 01 lncha Comt,-31aire Airr'Ort 1984-1985 AIP Apptiant Agency 12.45 02 bletrcpolitan Airports CO TTl1ssiOn -_ Ap plKanl Adill M 1511 n11 12A5 07 P.O. Box 11700 Ttlin City Air Canlail hr an 12•AS 04 Nigel D. Finre/, Dirc=to: Of 12 11 Pro1M Dawpllon • Nuwb /err Wee and By OS 12 71 06 master Plan 1B DIOVe1OlrTlelt7 07 06 12.71 09 12 71 10 11IPietist Location City 1245 Mcka County -Blaine Airport 6 Dlnuon 46.72 .--za0�- o�V `� City 46-60 ZIoCWe 76-80 St. Paul IM 55111 Aral Code 4648 Frone A9.55 Ea1.$6.59 i .g 612 726-1892 bl I Location County 46.79 Anoka IING FUNDS X43 OTHER (El Funds 44.51 TOTAL IN Funds 5240 Local �j n Ann - - - 119r, 10- TYpe of DimasFunds IEI+I Tips at Otnw Fenuu Fu1w1101 1245 — — — ti — — — FMeral Gulo9 No. fi7.71 Fedaral Pio9wm Title 1245 20.102 14 AL rt rove7�lt P BT Federal Sue -Agency 46.79 edelel Agency Name IIAS Federal Aviation Pimini strat30n Is Dopartme7lt of Transportation TYPE OF APPLICANT ICHECK 1xl ONLY ONE BO%1 Special Community Sponlertd Other Silts Inln• County City School Action Organinlion DistrictAction❑ 19 ❑ 20 StillDInnel ❑14 ❑15 016 raTJ 17 ❑ 11 13 TYPt OF ACTION ICHECA I%1 BOXES WHICH APPLY) ❑ 24 lnernwd Dollars ❑ New ® 21 Supplemental ❑ 23 Duration17 ❑ 25 Dennw Oolbn ❑ 72 Cantdulien L—t ifi Osirisw Ouralipn rtn+ I DenllnVallen Has geplolwl A9tncY h P,aIM adMw A 95 Et,wi It Sue Ptan peen Nouhedi hnrdlulon7 Impact =Nn R lAuirad7 Na yet No Yes ]2 Yee No ©15❑ ]6 ED 2g © ]0]1❑ Aumist 19841D+UI Estimated Date Applicant Expects To Submit Formal Application Slew Fund Code r Febrary 23, 1984 r_ Data Sgnawre SU81.11T T1v0121 COPIES OF COMMENTS 4 C061PLETEO fO.q T0: 0 _10 0 I Slate Planning Agency Capitol Square is I c2 550 Cedar Street 7 St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 ys-.e_• ?Iar. 3 - e e Cale^: - S1,900,000 -dill mve the=csc_.,, -c^ Jsar_: ==,av z.c _cWzv s; s� zc c ar`ly 950' b c°_e w=-6. ALSO i-.dttiea 1 : `E -=4e- will :e .e erasias c= to es:f es� = :way = 4, 000'. he :.dr.CZ C^5� �- 1 axSa be dwm—' ed as 6 and xssi-IV as e=�'_y as 1986. P ncu cl or SPRING 11R Y111Y '1 ,tom �.I'Y urracc. m.u� ... nni! R A M S E Y 4-11,409 U'•31'•O' •i.41Y01 11'•�1 .11''• • ' I 4� MEMO TO: Mayor and City Counc(((il,����,DQ FROM: Clerk -Administrator _`/ , DATE: April 11, 1984 SUBJECT: CODE -A -PHONE CAPABILITIES Attached to this memorandum please find a memorandum from Parks, Recreation and Forestry Director Anderson responding to inquiries made by Councilmember Doty at a recent Council meeting regarding the capabilities of our code -a -phone which answers after hours incoming phone calls to the City offices on lines 3055 and 3771. As indicated in his memorandum, Mr. Anderson suggests that lengthy messages on the machine are not listened to by callers and the major purpose for the machine is to advise callers as to the emergency after hour phone numbers and special information which cannot normally be provided during the normal working day, such as, cancellation of evening ball games. I would agree that a second code -a -phone would be advisable, however, would suggest that a purchase be deferred until the item can be included in the 1985 Budget. DFP/pf Attachment MEMO TO: Donald Pauley, Clerk-Admin FROM: Bruce K. Anderson, DI Parks, Recreation and DATE: April 4, 1984 RE: Code -A -Phone Capabilities Attached is the specification sheet for the City's code -a -phone #111 which indicates that the equipment has a six minute announcement time. Our experience with the recorder has been that any message longer than 30 seconds is not listened to by the caller. The bigger problem beyond the attention span of our cal- lers is that our objective with the announcements is to turn as many phone callers over as we possibly can in the shortest period of time. An example of this would be evening rain -out games; when we receive an extremely high volume of calls, anywhere from 200 - 300 calls per evening, so we try to keep our messages as short as possible so that those people will be able to receive the information requested. As you are also aware, our current phone system works on a rotary schedule so that if someone calls in to the City and the recorder is busy, the phone system will immediately forward it to the next line which will just ring and ring as no recorder system is hooked up to that. For this reason also, we keep the messages as short as possible. The code -a -phone we purchased does not have the capabilities of leaving a message on it. We did that intentionally, as we felt that we would be receiving a great number of messages, that it would be inappropriate and we felt that direct one-on-one contact would best oeet our residents' concerns. In conclusion, I would like to add that the City might want to explore the purchase of the second code -a -phone which might ad- vertise City messages or items of a longer nature should the Council desire. But, from our perspective, there is very strong proven need for a code -a -phone in the recreation department with short, concise, clear messages. Should you have any questions regarding my position on this issue, feel free to contact myself directly at ext. #41. BKA/sll Attachment Code A Plime ill gives your callers LIP to six minutes of information, around die clock. lrarY,1,;. i'I .1 u.ra,!dn•. ., d lit it t:... I it :n Ii,r: :hr I:I .u:' ::1.u:, .1Lt ,In•.n cl � c,lp. ul' II 111 a,u1np l,, ,l:ul kit Irtl1l11!'•, J,I,I I'. 11 crivptlon, 1 he Code-AThone 111.2 VA line-hnlJ atpahilily. 6 hen vr:Joliet, need Inmr inlol tim- In,n. Ili,- 1!I ?+,m I1,dd them rn lh:' hot' .In:I NIII r AM1011nrill lei I1, and abet %IIt, I hat pvr,unal-itWilli, In is m'.o,,., l t lIlk l I V I !;r, e drl.ub, take orders, tnakl• reset : ata'u,, oI note work pnygr„ ill rom Iwihnp, a lyhl a11.1 Pu;.,-I •.upy,lr o,un the,ll,tiomll loiter,' alaml jack, du' 111-2 1 XI .l>:nal 1ralehouso or fardutliIII I,.': L, i, to AI'M-1 %hen kiln, e help is :;oat ullabh• For every office, Iher's another creative way to use the Code-A- Phnne 111. II i„•I I• : r. ! I„i,J •!" ,:::;rnl i`:II, �a"..! m,, xt.l h,! Inca•, Irllon, Ih1Ul'�aC, ollh a L•ginniny; I it the IN i update t''cr ,air'. toll' Im prier, immitl•n: e Id Il Llipnl. I'se Ihr 111 I1h111 r,n; CIIIIIII 1`111'UI'lit 1 s111p,.1,r1,.1: r- "!1'u:,'u1 r. Col!rn,nIt, I 111,11 It if .1 'a.: nl ;':I•, :, „111e1 I,'tadl'�ph1.11+. I'd:. rM1 I, P:U JiJL' ut!•, Iqu, Jutolnulnr suppd', .IT .ale I.i". ur use II fill lnlhhc 1rt,lnl,u'. ,:.rr."'.I• fnr radio and nrw,I+apel it ,' In gllverinnl,lll, the I. "If, -.I 16na, .1! serves as all in(armeDon,ll I Ieamll: le nl„• e,k :I 17:.Ine III .I nn,l9%U l aft l rr'n f,', r 4n"'1M1.•rr lilp Iye lrm!I, ;':r; -. a:•tl„rurrnlf ,dldlple e;l„rr'.Ifn`rI. .nl,l hlll ilr Ir!,lli„n, h,.,l Inr ,rnal. •t... tong; r,slurn ,1 n,1 gon•:nnn•nt apa'n: irk. \Lin; !rt;al 'a::i,d;tunn, usrl rd,' 1. 1,, lot pulrniul pui,ls kil-m ab,mt L i.l! v hr,lull dW I,.•,iri I pubhi wrviev uIll 111a , ., ,.Ivmy;.eh•trr,rnlllepn•crnllnn I: i.,..111 nn:!1Imi',Ilion ill (IIT111.1IsI"I l4, I I Ihr III Iv v,no Ivsldr.nl ,uwin Av and trade hi 1%%, diy,Ln'4. bt a,I,linl;.m e.lruor s1mil.rl an.! input JAI vwi oldrd n1.1!rrl.d due, I!; ri, Ilu' 111 .11111rtill, pnV'Ill I.Ii nlli, it,, :'led show ell, 111M it pollolll k"I'I! I., ul,llll" ✓I {'u.: 1st ali Dnedet and,;thdrviltu party is :I ;av h„hI the ,.11i Icdl la'.nnr�:n,rn; alh• it tit III tnL'f e'I'.l`I'•,n Ills made ht Ford lodusitil•s, ib,- ltalionc ourl v\perieneed nlakel of Irlephune an,nrtinl; rquip;urnl, I, ,' ,L, .. 111,'III I'. I•e 1, i!., 0% 'v1,! u,nn l I `r I q:, ..,I, 1 00 1 . .I: 1Ip I.I,�I(, .rl en•❑sunk, ..1r:r r:f +'...' "".. Al -m ed rngnvtIlls pro: rr. i .rm, rw:!, 11:11: Specifications Code -A -Phone lll-1'll1-' Announcentcnl • 1'ariablr up Inch minuh•n. • 8r, rid and nt II".c using integral handset • Au\ilLlr}' IMIldulg input jack. Answer • Ins rIII nµ call l uun!er. T( !ial hau',ultl end of announce. n1ellt 21" "Filled fI'!ICI1A V, pole,!all jarkel!nr.> I'u h irtd:'.,I, a, luated plathlrk for dl'll.1% point-o1. • I:„n1o,r ,In•aL,•r ia, l..I,: ri,P ad,huor.a. l'p:i.•nIi i:n, dedd ,! 11 ,I i.'l,'.'a: In!o!m.dlnll • IIrul,dr.11nlm la,i.Il!::I Im e!!a; i:n'r�.: 1!:al t 1'4 r is on 1111e.11"M Dimeositms (iuulri line . ,,,.n .I MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Finance Director -Treasurer Brayer DATE: April 12, 1984 RE: 1903 Water 6 Sewer Funds Budgeted Contingency The adopted 1983 budgets of the Water Fund and the Sewer Fund each contained $15,000 contingency for main breaks. Monies not expended for main breaks during 1983 were to be designated to offset the costs of breaks in future years. During 1983 the following sums were spent for breaks. Water Ridge Lane $2,055 Jeffrey Drive 210 Silver Lake Road 1,987 TOTAL Water Main Breaks $4,252 Sewer Woodale $4,145 Groveland 1,399 TOTAL Sewer Main Breaks $5,544 The Water Fund operating budget contained $7,400 for breaks. Thus $3,148 of the amount in the operating budget remained unexpended as well as the contingency of $15,000. Thus a total of $18,148 is available to offset the costs of future breaks. Sewer main breaks of $5,544 during 1983 left a balance in that fund's contingency of $9,456. This amount is available to offset the costs of future breaks. RECOMMENDATION A resolution be adopted designating $18,148 of Water Fund retained earnings and $9,456 of Sewer Fund retained earnings for water and sewer main breaks respectively. DB/ds MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Finance Director -Treasurer 8rager DATE: April 12, 1984 RE: 1983 WATER & SEWER SYSTEM MAINTEI4ANCE & CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PROJECT'S SUMMARY Table W-3, Water System Maintenance and Imprnvement Schedule, contained in the above referenced report, lists $107,300 of projects which were planned for 1983, Exhibit 10 of the same report shows the planned financing for the planned projects. Planned sources of funding were: budgeted annual maintenance allowance, $42,500; loan from Special Projects Fund, $40,000; and a transfer from the Water Systems Contributions Fund, $24,800. As may be seen on the attached schedule expenses for water system maintenance activities during 1983 were $66,956. This is well under planned expenditures of $107,300. As a consequence, Council authorization was not sought for interfund loans or transfers nor were any made. The only actual cash in the Water Fund for the program is that which was collected through the annual maintenance allowance. In these circumstances a comparison of actual expenses to planned or budgeted is not meaningful because planned revenues were not realized. The $66,956 expended in 1983 for scheduled maintenance activities includes some projects which should not be charged against the maintenance allowance monies collected in 1983. The 1983 operating budget included repair of a well. Therefore, $13,110 expended for Well Number 6 service should not be charged against the maintenance allowance. The Water Treatment Study was authorized in 1982 and financing was to come from the fund's retained earnings. Thus, $19,804 expended for the Study should not be charged against the monies collected for the maintenance allowance. Subtracting those two items from the $66,956 expended for maintenance leaves $34,042 to be charged against the maintenance allowance. The 1983 Water Fund budget dedicated $0.1130 per 1,000 gallons of water sold for maintenance. $44,198 was actually collected on sales of 391,133,000 gallons of water. Additionally $23,458 of expected investment income was budgeted to begin paying back interfund loans. This amount should be dedicated to maintenance activities even though the loans weren't made in 1983. The reason being that rates were set in anticipation of a loan being made and therefore if unused the monies should be dedicated to future maintenance activities. In total $67,656 were collected during 1983 for maintenance activities. As previously mentioned $34,042 of maintenance activities were performed in 1983 which should be charged to maintenance funds collected. A balance of $33,614 is left for future maintenance activities. April 12, 1984 Page 2 The 1983 Sewer fund budget ,,lowed 33,187 for iplannedtureswere made maintenance activities. During are available which were chargeable to the monies. Thus, they for future years maintenance activities. RECOMMENDATION In order that these balances and future balances may be officially recognized in our natinC1$331614records, retainedrecommend earrnings a resolution be adopted designating of the water Fund and $33,187 of the Sewer Fund for future maintenance activities contained in the water and Sewer Systems Maintenance and Capital Imp Dp/ds April 12, 1984 Page 3 1983 WATER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES Year Budget Expenses Budgeted 1983 l$1,983 $16,500 $13,110 Well No. 6 Service Treatment Plant No. 2 Service 11983 500 658 Treatment Plant No. 3 Service 1,983 500 0 Regasket Well No. 2 Motor 1,983 700 0 Hydrant, Valve 6 Main Service 1,983 15,000 0 Treatment Plant No. 1 1,983 600 439 Compressor Service Modify Treatment Plant No. 1 1,983 6,000 4,181 Atometer .. Update Well Motor Controls 1,983 12,000 0 Modify Treatment Plant No. 1 11983 1,000 0 Compressor Controls Water Treatment Study 1,983 14,500 19,804 Treatment Plant 2 6 3 1,983 40,000 26,440 Modifications Clean 6 Inspect 1,984 5,100 1,09E Ground Reservoir 1,984 32,100 1,226 Tower No. 2 Service $66,956 TOTAL EXPENSES t4.,,. /3 Tu: i4dyuf 6 Council ROM: Finance Director -Treasurer J DATE: April 12, 1984 SOURCES ANOKA COUNTYNG Fop, OSSIBLE LAWSUIT EXPANSION RE Clerk-Administrator Pauley has informed me of your request for identification of sources of funding for a possible lawsuit re tthe hatAsuch costsyAirport could be appansion. I have roximately n further advised roximately $100,OOO Since most of our funds are designated for specific purposes, i.e., the Forestry Fund is only for forestry activities, the only source of funding is the General Fund. Specifically Resolution No. 1717 (copy attached) transferred $100,000 from the Special Projects Fund to establish, a reserve for contingencies. Those monies could be designated by you for a possible lawsuit. DD/ds RESOLUTION NO. 1717 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING A TRANSFER OF FUNDS F11014 THE SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND TO THE GENERAL FUND WHEREAS, the City's auditors have, in dated December 31, 1982, recommended that the adequate level of fund balance in the General provide for the financial strength and integr WHEREAS, the Council recognizes that fund balance is necessary to provide for cash emergency and/or unanticipated expenditures; their management report city maintain an Fund in order to ity of the City; and an adequate level of flow requirements and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council that $238,000.00 be transferred from the Special Projects Fund to the fund balance of the, General Fund and it is hereby designated for cash flow reserves, - BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Council that $100,000.00 be transferred from the Special Projects Fund to the fund balance of ;*"'A the General Fund and it is hereby designated as a reserve for ' , contingencies; i BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Council that these transfers are to be made after Ordinance 356, An Ordinance Establishing i Chapter 27 of the Municipal Code Entitled "Special Projects" is in effect pursuant to provisions of the City Charter. Adopted this 13th day of February, 1984. ATTEST: (SEAL) L, J MEMO TO: Clerk -Administrator and City Council FROM: Director of Public Works/Community Development DATE: April 12, 1984 SUBJECT: PINECREST PARK DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL Attached please find a resolution from the Planning Commission on the subject project. As you recall, this project hinges on the approval of a full median cross -over on Highway 10 by the Department of Transportation. As of this date, I have not received any comments from the Department of Transportation on the full median cross -over. The Planning Commission recommends rezoning the land from B-3 and R-4 to Industrial. The Planning Commission also recommends that the Council review the berm, landscaping and site plans. The developer submitted the plans on April 11, 1984 at 4:30 p.m. Attached please find a copy of Dan Boxrud's transmittal letter and the three drawings that were attached. I have reviewed the subject letter and drawings and in my opinion they are adequate as long as the berm is no steeper than 3 foot horizontal to 1 foot vertical. RECOMMENDATION: If the berm, landscaping and site plans meet your approval, I recommend approving the proposal with the stipu- lation that the slopes are no steeper than 3 to 1 and proceed with the next steps of the development. SWT/bc Attachments MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION I"N RESOLUTION NO. 107-84 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE. OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE PINECREST PARK DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL TO THE MOUNDS VIEW CITY COUNCIL LAND LOCATED N.E. OF HIGHWAY 10 AND SOUTH OF COUNTY ROAD H-2, CASE 150-84 WHEREAS, the applicant, Pinecrest Properties, has requested the following: 1. Rededication of Raymond Avenue. 2. Petition for public improvements for Raymond Avenue. 3. Rezone from B-3 and R-4 to Industrial the following lots of the plat Pinecrest Addition: Lot 1, Block 1 Lot 3, Block 1 Lot 1, Block 2 Lot 2, Block 2 4. Dedication of street right-of-way addition and full median cross -over to Trunk Highway 10 between proposed Raymond Avenue and County Road H-2; and WHEREAS, the rededication of Raymond Avenue and street right-of-way addition together with the full median cross -over on Trunk Highway 10 will he an adequate street plan to provide basic access to the proposed development; and WHEREAS, the petition of public improvements is 100 percent and necessary for development; and WHEREAS, the rezonings requested are in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan direction for District 2; and WHEREAS, the applicant has proposed a minimum 40 foot screening and buffer area along County Road H-2; and WHEREAS, the applicant has proposed a cul-de-sac at the north end of Raymond Avenue with an emergency access only from County Road H-2 to eliminate a traffic impact to the northern residential area; and WHEREAS, the lots within the proposed development all meet minimum area requirements; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission recommends approval of the applicant's request as stated above in items 1, 2, 3 and 4; Resolution No. 107-84 Page Two of Two BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission recommends the developer submit a berm, landscaping, and sight plan to the City Council for their approval including construction time table, ground cover (sod, wood chips, etc.), shrubery and evergreen trees. The Planning Commission recommends construction of berm/landscaping at the same time as street construction. The Planning Commission also recommends that the developer and subsequent owners maintain the property (including berm) guaranteed by a bond. The development agreement should address noise and dust control; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission recommends extending the area of public notice for the hearing to include the property within 800 feet north of the development; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission also recommends approval of the Raymond Avenue cul-de-sac for emergency access from County Road H and a minimum 40 foot buffer/screening area along County Road H-2 as shown on the site plan received by Mounds View on March 7, 1984, attached hereto. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission direct staff to forward this resolution to the City Council prior to approval of the minutes; Adopted this 4th (lay of April, 1984. ATTEST: (SEAL) Chairman Director of Public Works/ Community Development April 11, 1984 City of Mounds View 2401 Highway 10 Mounds View, MN 55112 SHORT-ELLIOTT-HENDRICKSON, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS SI PALL, %IINNISOTA • CHIPPEWA FALLS, WISCONSIN RE: PINE CRFST PROPERTIES REZONING SEH FILE. NO. 84103 Attention: Mr. Steve Thatcher, Director of Public Works/Community Development Enclosed are preliminary grading and landscaping plans for the berm proposed between the residential properties on the north side of County Road H-2 and the proposed industrial land south of County Road H-2 in the proposed Pinecrest Park Industrial Development, You will note that the height of the earth portion of the berm is proposed to be constructed to the eye height of a person standing in any of the homes on the north side of County Road H-2 west of Raymond Avenue. The 3:1 side slopes can be varied to 2:1 in certain locations during final design to add interest. A combination of deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs would further screen the view above that elevation should an industrial building be constructed fairly close to County Road H-2. We believe that the berming and landscaping proposed is in excess of that required by city code. You will also note that there is no berming or landscaping proposed east of Raymond Avenue at this time. A duplex at the northeast corner of Raymond Avenue and County Road H-2 has no windows on the south side. The mobile home park east of the duplex has its own screen fence of an adequate height to shield it from the proposed industrial development. You will, of course, be able to require appropriate landscaping as part of the site plan approval of any industrial use in this corner of the property. Also enclosed are some sketches upon which our landscape architect based his drawings. These sketches are to an engineer- ing scale which may not be too meaningful to the City Council. However, they are included for your review of the proposal. If you require anything further, please call, Sincere y, Daniel 11 Boxru Enclosure cc: Bob Balch, Watson -Forsberg Co. 200 GOPHER BUILDING • 222 IAST LH HE CANADA ROAD • SI. PALI, SIINNISOIA 55117 • PHONE (6111484.0172 MEMO TO: Clerk -Administrator and City Council FROM: Director of Public Works/Community Development DATE: April 12, 1984 SUBJECT: GALE/YOST ADDITION At the April 4, 1984 Planning Commission meeting, the Commission added item a(8) which is a ten foot wide foot path easement, item e, a variance for a 60 foot radius and 25 foot setback and item f, removal of a shed and garage. The developer has agreed to these items. RECOMMENDATION: I recommend approval of this development as in icate in the Planning Commission resolution. I also recommend scheduling a public hearing at the next available time. SWT/bc MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION 1 RESOLUT1OtJ NO� 04-84 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL REGARDING GALE./YOST ADDITION, 8205 LAPORT DRIVE, CASE 149-84 WHEREAS, the developer is proposing a major subdivision consisting of three lots; and WHEREAS, the City, to date, has received a petition for the public improvement and a feasibility study has be submitted; WHEREAS, the hardship justification for the project is the City,s closing of the easement on Ardan Avenue which made other lot development not practical; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that a development agreement be entered into between the City of Mounds View and the developers, Susan Gale and Debra Yost, which include the following provisions: a. Exhibits 1) site grading and utility plan 2) site development and landscape plan 3) site survey 4) easement map and legal description for required storage pond (ordinance No. 49A) 5) legal description 6) Ordinance No. 49A seven year performance bond of $1,000.00 7) building plans and specifications 8) 10 foot wide foot path easement b. Security for the development in an amount to be determined. c. Payment of all City expenses above and beyond amounts previously submited. d. Other items as may be required by the City Council. e. Variance for 60 foot radius and 25 foot setback. f. Removal of shed and garage. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission direct staff t ofothedmthis resolution to the City Council prior to approval s. Adopted this 4th day of April, 1984. ATTEST: Chairman (SEAL) Director of Public Works Community Development CMEMO TO: Clerk -Administrator and City Council FROM: Director of Public Works/Community Development DATE: April 12, 1984 SUBJECT: POVLITSKI'S OFF-10 WALLEYBALL COURT REQUEST Mr. Richard Povlitski is requesting approval to install an indoor volleyball court. The Planning Commission has recommended approval of his request. I have no recommendation on this request. You can approve, deny or request additional information from staff. SWT/bc MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION N0. 106-84 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL REGARDING POVLITSKI'S OFF-10 WALLEYBALL COURT REQUEST, 2400 COUNTY ROAD H-2, CASE 151-84 WHEREAS, Richard Povlitski, owner of Povlitski's Off-10 is requesting approval to install an indoor volleyball (walleyball) court; and WHEREAS, the property is presently zoned B-3 Highway Commercial; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds that walleyball would be an allowable accessory use; and WHEREAS, the walleyball court use would require an additional minimum of six parking spaces; and WHEREAS, the owner of Povlitski's Off-10 intends to close two of his four entrances to his property and provide a minimum of ten additional parking spaces; and WHEREAS, the closing of two entrances will not only provide additional parking spaces but better screen the adjacent and abutting residential properties; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission recommends approval of the installation of the walleyball court at Povlitski's Off-10 located at 2400 County Road H-2 and issuance of the building permit after submittal and approval of the plans and specifications. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission directs staff to forward this resolution to the City Council prior to approval of the minutes. ATTEST: (SEAL) Adopted this 4th day of April, 1984. Chairman Director of Public Works Community Development *A- MEMO TO: Clerk -Administrator and City Council FROM: Director of Public Works/Community Development DATE: May 11, 1984 SUBJECT: BUS REROUTE REQUEST ADAMS AND BRONSON STREETS Enclosed please find a copy of the bus reroute petition and map indicating the number of houses with residents signing the peti- tion. As you can see, the petition was signed by residents in eight houses. There are a total of twenty three houses/build- ings on Adams Street. There are twenty four houses on Bronson Drive from Jackson Drive to Quincy Street. I have taken the liberty to analyze alternative bus routes during the Spring when road restrictions are posted. They will also analyze this area. I wrote Mr. Bruce Mattson on April 5, 1984 informing him of my actions and that I will write him as soon as we have the M.T.C. analysis. There is no action for the Council to take at this time. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me at my office. SWT/jj W iP kP I!j„IM City Of Ploundview l 2401 IIwy.11 10 RECEIVED =: :Ioundvicw,Minn.55112 CITY or 4 h1O11NOS VIEW Attn: Steve Thatcher March 19, i '!+ Subject; Bus route change. Dear Steve; lie as concerned lux payers are requesting _erouting of the MTC hus route #10, off Adams and bronson streets, Because of the damage caused by the over weighted buses. I'nm told the stccts arc designed for loads much less than the weight of a empty bus which is (10) ten to (11�) eleven and one half tons. During the spring when road restictions are on,they are (3) three -Lo (5) five tons. The buses are permited to ruin our roads five days every week, and many times daily. I'm sure that WC will not pay for the repairs of our roads,L'am sure. that we will. Bruce Madsen, Spokesman,No, :::rod Committee. 5663 Adams Street 7 S 71 Mnundview, Minn.55112 PARTITIONERS t"O*N hI rrIN 1 N 1'/658• ,Tf41 k44 r651 •,. rc+1 - 431 7531 W 75:1 .. 1i�1'S01 ,4 i 53U; Vh r 5: I LVIL — 6 �c j •v�'p•N•r'�•�'n �' C rryaN Bi f•� 0 r. M N -V•N O y�J ❑N N•1N O U J O �' g r��• . rv,711N IMI uLN ,i P16D 'A NQ O� ll Irlula•ril tlrolal�T�V!� mlO Ff rn I`i ri- P iS n 7 I 'ry - 51rr1 O3RNDO• JN I5 r aIJ J I I I Ir I r 1 / I I! L16J:19 1'w rV n 4N Jp'13 13 IZ5611 f& 4nN ;.n.l ••.• I - .�1 O. �G(4'l-07 A III :P 11 �l•li?'J1JI jrl�i flc�+r�'rI'f '01"i 1kr11 "',pf I 'I-, 1 il. rv1 IvI � t. r e •+ 1n/_IV II 71J' ,!J r'ml 'r ( J l- r i 1. I z,. idr rF: S:a:' n 'r J.!In'ilfl i I1. Jlit-rO rl IIr m Y Ir I I� NI'r• r y J J' W a t W 1 •r r Ir �A tiry V 'p O N j ,�I� 1 f � V i.lrt � = !� � •� v, �' a I I N N ry n m eI �' ° •J c� n r 11r tl�39m r LA' i � ill,-rJ'IhJr'L/ A.r r�I I^,u + r 1 7-r• •i rv-�ll �I� Vll ry.Bl ���. !mI Ii dAY+r. ^• „� n����tl m l J 6 :. N 26 (N N j N I •f C N I V N �1 �T coun1Y ROAD •1- iu u' I - p al 55N Ir5512 ?_ NE N N NI •_-• •--i4l'i s5os I5504 t sso5 I PINEWOOD n 5491 5493 5494 5493y{' f 54BSI i55lo SCHOOL I GhOBERG 61. 5485 5486 I54B�4fl• 1 5474 •54731 54nf -54T5 5478 • _-47 .S•16B /5461 5464#': Jy, `j54G6 ,,_5467 C SG07 ff, r5.54 5455 :SG,'Tbv "QQyfyf., vtf 45' I I V ,. 5445 > -. I1l'.l{. II n,1�5�44'.44,6D. -I•� 5u4_4.�15441 'QN dI��4-C'\'e�\aN 1n_ v_'{L"4i iwr n Pr4 f4 \ I 54i1,,5+.;0 •. 20 IS-IsAlal°541.7 i• ml�liOr,-� 54:19 5 DG 54A 5406'NNNINI MINI Nt 5 - N N N'rv•N'� •lv �N �1' f,JN —N IRON N DR1YE Wroo�'Polr+i12 - S391 I579G559'i IN IJ N NIN. ^l-N .� I N N � N w NI y�1i6 512'.1 gYr V. I' M' Z 5d7 I I r � �•Jf4.5'6A fG j I 154 Ir�Ielvinl N!"1�JI3 DI�I aI I51T:,S'6 j5358 53!7 5355 535 f5157.535153'2Y535 1 Lambert 124 Pork NOAC �F• ENO I HPvtEf el�rgop /h7p7ON I 1 1605 )fUPVT7v(, R QViST tiry Oi MsvlveS vifw !°=spot r s / I J J r i 1 *7 /Q MEMO TO: Clerk -Administrator and City Council FROM: Director of Public Works/Community Development DATE: April 10, 1984 SUBJECT: EXTERIOR REPAIRS 2 M.G. RESERVIOR AND REPAINTING EXISTING 500,000 GALLON WATER TOWER Attached please find a copy of the tabulation of bids and recommendation of award from Patrick J. Lehman, T.X.D.A. Mr. Lehman recommends awarding exterior repairs of the 2 m.g. reservior to Graham's Contracting Company. Graham's Contracting CO.'s bid is for $15,200.00. The budget is $55,000.00. Mr. Lehman recommends awarding repainting existing 500,000 gallon water tower to Odland Protective Coatings, Inc. Mr. Lehman recommends awarding the alternative bid which is for exterior paint roller application. Odland Protective Coatings,Inc.'s bid is $36,840.00. The budget for this item is $32,000.00. RECOMMENDATION: Staff concurs with the recommendations as presented by T.X.D.A. Staff recommends awarding the projects to Graham's Contracting Company and Odland Protective Coatings, Inc., respectively. SWT/bc Attachments IpI Ir SOCI f,FaNCURFORAIE i1`i iMi :.NI, 1 XINUAN i LL AN E1U1E0 ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLANNERS 1W)AML"ICAN NATIONAL DANK BUILDING SAINTPAIL I.IINNFSOTASyIBI 111.92 111YY April 9, 1984 City of Mounds View 2401 Highway 10 Mounds View, Minnesota 55112 Attention: Mr. Steve Thatcher City Engineer Re: Water System Improvements Commission Nos. 8052-012 and 8052-022 Dear Mr. Thatcher: Enclosed are the bid tabulations for "Exterior Repairs 2 MG Reservoir" and "Repainting Existing 500,000 Gallon Elevated Water Storage Tank No. 2". All bids were received in accordance with the specification. Accordingly, TKDA recommends awarding each contract to respective low bidder: 1. Exterior Repairs 2 MG Reservoir - Graham's Contracting Company. 2. Repainting Existing 500,000 Gallon Elevated Water Storage Tank No. 2 - Odland Protective Coatings, Inc. - Alternate Bid (exterior paint roller application). We are also enclosing a reference list from Odland Protective Coatings, Inc. to verify their qualifications. If you have any questions, please call me at 292-4501. Sincerely yours, TOLTZ, KING, DUVALL, ANDERSON AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED PJL:adh Enclosures cc: J. T. Kirk, TKDA I TABULATION OF BIDS FOR; Mnundt 91w, Mlnnet0 to P052.012 RROICCI: Llerlor Repairs 2 Mf. Reservoir TK11A ,q,a,y aKD .w nwuuu saw+mo 010 DUE: April 2. 1994 _.....__ CONTRACTOR Grahams Burg -Miller A. J. Spaniers MacPherson. Right -Way Contracting iuckpolntlng, Company, Inc. Tone Company Caulking, Inc. Company Inc, FAY -it Oww", AfOFIQII a a a ITEM A A N0. I Complete „orl Specified, evClualnq the replacement of bricks S1/,600.00 S17,86uo S22,216.00 $22.000.00 $20,516.00 2 Replacement of missing and defective bricks 1100 bricks) 600.00 1.200.00 925.00 1.297.00 60O.0p TOTAL 610 (Total Items 110. 1, 2) $15,200.00 S19,065.00 S20,161.00 S20,200.00 S2/,116.00 Rage 1 of 2 TABULATION OF BIDS FOR: ..".unmP. Ylr., Nl nuetula Po152•4112 PBOIPC7: Crierlor Repairs 2 K• Reserrulr TKDA em nl v. enNl l IOYe PriW U". uvunlrh ,V�. •,l u.. MIRAVOR All States Tuckpolntin9 Seal -Treat. Inc. Sunrise Specially Contracting. Inc. PROPOSAI 0MAKIII ' a 40M IIIt NO. I C,mplete .wl specified, mlud,no the rel-IJC—nnt of clicks $26,632.00 527,490.00 528,200.IH1 2 RRplaunr•nt of ml SSIng and delec Uve Lrnls (Ion pricks) 700.D0 700.00 900.00 TOTAL BID (Total Itsas 110. 1. 2) $24,172.00 528,190.00 529,000.00 TABULATION OF BIDS FOR: Maunds Vie., Minnesota R052-022 PROJECT: Repainting Edslin9 500,GM Gallon TKDA ••�•--- Elevated Water Storage Tank No. 2 "`0C•'�a "K°"0'•"° BID OAIE: Aorll 2, 1904 twanans .°nmtns n•.uuv. CONTRACTOR Odland Dairyland Tenyer Aai nbo•. Inc. Neumann Protective Improvements Coatings. Inc. Cmpany Coatings, Inc. Company, Ina. Contractors, Inc bf PfiML. 0UA40EE t WDDOA 1 I1[1 NO. pcvoval of psiuler's rail, repair Of lank shell plates, .eepholes in I balcony, Arout repair 950 2,000 1,000 3,288 4,f100 Repair of damaged strut 1.250 1.500 50n 11675 1,ODO Preparation and painting Interior tans surfaces with eNq 3 paint system 14,995 14.000 22,000 22,592 29.000 Preparation and pafntfnA e.terior tank surfaces with silicone alkyd paint 4 System - spray application (Base Bid( 34,300 21.000 No 6:c 27.878 no old Preparation and Valnlino e.terior tank surfaces with Silicone alkyd paint 5 system - roller aPollcailon (Alternate Bid) 19,645 No Bid 19.000 27.878 29.000 TOTAL BASE BID (Total ItemS Ito. 1. 2, 3, 4) 51,495 38,500 10 E•: 56.033 No Bid TOTAL ALTERNATE BID (Total Items No. 1, 2, 3, 5) 36.840 No Bid 42.500 56,033 63,000 MANUFACTURER AND PRODUCT RAMC Interior Paint System: TNEMEC MOBIL THEMIC TNEMEC TNEMEC Primer Coat 20.185 7B 5e'Ies ?0-!?55 20.1255 20.1255 Finish Coat 20.2000 7B Series 20.2000 20.2000 20-2000 E.terfor Paint System: TNEMEC MOBIL TNE7:EC TNEMEC TMEMC Primer Coat 37-77 I3-R-50 37.77 37.77 37.77 Inte mediate Coat 23 Series 12 Series 23 Series 23 Series 23 Series Finish Coal 82 Series 21 Series 02 Series 82 Series 82 Series Page 1 of I • MEMO TO: Clerk -Administrator 5 City Council FROM: Director of Public Works/Community Development o DATE: April 10, 1984 SUBJECT: Soil Borings for MSA Streets and Televising Sewers and Associated Vaporizing of Roots I received two quotes for soil borings. Brauns Engineering Testing is for $2,840, Soil Exploration Company's quote is for $2,350. I recommend awarding the work to Soil Exploration Company. The budget for this item is $3,500. I received a verbal quote and two written quotes for televising the sanitary sewer. The verbal quote from Midwest was for 25C per linear foot at 30,000 linear feet ($7,500). The first written quote, Professional Services Group Inc. was for 25C per linear foot at 30,000 linear feet ($7,500). The written quote from Solidification Inc. was ($6,000). RECOMMENDATION: I recommend awarding the work to Soil Exploration Company and to Solidification Inc. Solidification Inc. will also vaporize the sanitary sewer lines that have roots in them for 50C per linear foot. I estimate that we will vaporize a maximum of 5,000 linear feet. Therefore, the cost of vaporizing will be approximately $2,500. I recommend vaporizing the roots on an as needed basis. SWT/mb taw ao MEMO TO: Clerk -Administrator and City Council PROM: Director of Public Works/Community Development DATE: April 11, 1984 SUBJECT: N.S.A. STREETS - REARING REQUEST I believe the subject project should have a public hearing to inform the residents. This hearing, although not required by state law, will make the county and state approval process smoother. RECOMMENDATION: I recommend that the attached proposed notice of hearing on Public Improvement Project 84-3, "M.S.A. Streets 1984" be published in the New Brighton Bulletin for a minimum of two weeks. A also recommend that the Council direct City staff to mail a copy of the attached notice to all property owners that are adjacent to the project. SWT/jj X CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA PROPOSED NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING M.S.A. STREET PROJECT 1984 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Mounds View, Minnesota, will meet in the City Hall, 2401 Highway 10, Mounds View, Minnesota, 55112, at 8:00 PM on Monday, May 7, 1984 to consider the construction of the following streets: on Edgewood Drive from County Road H to County Road H-2; on Quincy Street from County Road I to Hillview Road; on County Road I from Highway 10 to Silver Lake Road, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 429.011 to 429.111. No assessment is proposed for such improvement. The estimated total cost of such improvement is $500,000.00. Anyone desiring to be heard with reference to this matter, may be heard at this meeting. (Bulletin: Donald F. Pauley Clerk -Administrator MEMO TO: Clerk -Administrator & City Council I� FROM: Director of Public Works/Community Development DATE: April 12, 1984 SUBJECT: The Street Sweeping Bids - Project 84-3 On April 6, 1994 four bids were received for the subject project. Clean Sweep Inc. bid $51.00 per hour and did not have a not to exceed price. American Sweepers Inc. bid $49 per hour with a not to exceed price of $5,880. Allied Blacktop Company bid $47 per hour with a not to exceed price of $5,170. Forgerty Truck Service did not have a price per hour, however, his not to exceed price is $4,685. Since Forgerty Truck Service did not provide a price per hour or a bid bond I do not believe we should award the work to him. The budget for street sweeping and waste disposal is $5,500. RECOMMENDATIONS: I recommend awarding the project to Allied Blacktop Company, 10503 89th Avenue N., Maple Plain MN, 55369 because they are within the budget and Forgerty Truck Service did not provide a bid bond. SWT/mb 4 aA Irk MEMO TO: Public Works/Community Developement Director, City Administrator, and City Council FROM: Building Inspector DATE: April 12, 1984 RE: FILL PERMIT REQUEST Carew Properties, owner of the parcel Programmed Land Second Addition, Lot 2, Block 1, have requested to recieve the City's Street Sweepings. Attached is a copy of the permit request with a partial plat copy of the lot where the fill is to be located (the lot to the east of the motel site). The lot in question does not exceed A acres so by the new standards of the Rice Creek Watershed District a permit from them would not be necessary, nor does it encroach on wetland or floodplain designated areas. The location for placement of the fill is advantageous for the City due to hauling cost. RECOMMENDATION: Approve the fill permit with a security deposit of 200 to assure the fill is grade properly and vegetation is reestablished. SAR/la r y p L� I r Q I aIDl(Pp � J ' a _ 5� I •P r ,n,•f (Ig I o..,..;;.;. !`ITV flir11IWWI1WQ YICFt BUILDING APPLICATION R spaige, onl . 1 4 v FI V\ C � 6u f�G rYr,r /�,, t5:s3 s. •o,up I.. CCl l L.L) 0 (oA'' (' y Clots of work: ❑NEW ❑ADDITTII'ON 1 ALTERATIION 0 1REPAIA�,/� MMOVnE ❑REMOVE OHGibe work: I T. t� a � I L l t n r. Oi I Chenpe of we from U I%/ y/,L I Change of u,e to/�j}J� VEIuHIon of work. S ES /.3/4I T.R. , NOTICE m aide (T.1111 50 it THE PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUC. 'ION AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 120 DAYS, OR IF CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED -- FOR A PERIOD OF 120 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS�ICOMMENCED.iine CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ ANDE%AMINEO THIS APPLICATION AND HNOW THE SAME TO UmuIHEREBY �•tALL SE TRUE AND CORRECT,� PROVISIONS OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES GOVERNING THIS. TYPE Of WORN WILL BE COMPLIED kDEPT WITH WHETHER SPECIFIED IEREIN OR NOT. THE :RESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITYI TO NG �OLATEF A E ORI CANCEL TT DOES HEPPlor•ROVISIONS A:ONSTRUCTION OF ANY OTHER STATE OR LOCAL LAW REGULATINGI,I O THE P RFOCcRMANCE OF CONSTRUCTION.NGJ/42TH DCPTDE PTA, REPORT - IMPORTANT TO APPLICANT PLEASE READ SPECIAL CONDI SEPERATE PERMITS REQUIRED FOR: PLUMBING # uC o. Ct 111 HEATING, VENTILATING 3-,21, OR AIR CONDITIONING# 1 ELECTRICAL # BLACKTOPPING I CONTRACTO SEWER# 6 WATER THIS IS AN APPLICATION ONLY THE PERMIT WILL BE ISSUED AFTER REVIEWAL OF THE APPLICATION. Oturotntr GInOd Ni, m S�nnn Ule ZOo, OFFSTREET Cmrrtd 0 k s re c " of f ee ra, P P. N Dwmm� Mt. Ott Load Fr, 501,nllU, Rao.'^d :)", ❑No PACES Untor,gd RS LICENSE yes no pendq PERMIT FEE S PLAN CHECK FEE z __.SURCHARGE __ t f-f.dJJ2, )g 7*/j Igo MEMO TO: Mounds View City Council FROM: Bruce K. Anderson, Director Parks, Recreation and Forestry DATE: April 12, 1984 RE: Tree City U.S.A. Award Attached is a letter dated April 2, 1984 Meg Hanisch, Urban For- estry Specialist, outlining the preliminary details on the pre- sentation of the Tree City U.S.A. Award. The award will be presented on Friday, April 27 at the State Capitol in St. Paul with specific details as far as times, coming at a later date. Staff indicated to you in a prior memo that we feel it would be appropriate for some representative of the City Council to attend the ceremonies if possible. I would like to request that those Councilmembers interested in attending on April 27 would contact myself no later than Friday, April 20, 1984. ' If you should have any questions regarding the Tree City U.S.A. Award, feel free to contact myself directly at ext. k41. BKA/sll Attachment ec: Rick Wriskey, City Forester LL�� STATE OF S� IUVU\ZJLLGCV U[ %Tl OF NATURAL RESOURCES BOX 44. CENTENNIAL OFFICE BUILDING 6 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 0 55155 DIM INFORMATION FILE NO. 2810-2 (612) 296.6157 April 2, 1984 (612) 296-5958 Richard F. Wriskey City Forester 2401 Highway 10 Mounds view, Minnesota 55112 Dear Mr. Wriskey: An Arbor Day celebration will be held on Friday, April 27th, at the State Capitol in St. Paul. As part of this event, the recipients of the TREE CITY USA award will be recognized ty the Governor or by a representative of his office. Since your city is one of the award winners, I am inviting you and all other interested municipal officials to attend the ceremony. There will be a tree planting and other Arbor Day activities so it should prove to be an interesting event. The actual ceremony is scheduled to begin at noon, but the city representatives will be asked to come earlier so the award presentation can be organized. Although you will be notified at a later date when and where to report, I would appreciate knowing if you and/or anyone from your city will be attending. Please contact me at (612) 296-5958 as soon as possible with your answer, Thank you in advance for your cooperation. Sincerely, �,� Meg tanitsch Urban Forestry Specialist M11: dv N AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA Uf j Regular Meetingg April 9, 1984 Mounds View City Hall - 2401 Hwy. 10, Mounds View, MN 55112 ------------------------ ---- -------------------------------------------- The Mounds View City Council was called to order by 1. Call to Order Mayor McCarty at 7:30 PM on April 9, 1984. The Pledge of Allegiance was said, and a moment of 2• Pledge of silence observed, Allegiance MEMBERS PRESENT: Councilmembers Doty, Linke, 3. Roll Call Han ner, anc and and Mayor McCarty. ALSO PRESENT: City Attorney Meyers, Clerk/ Administrator Pauley and Public Works/Community Development Director Thatcher. Motion/Second: Blanchard/Doty to approve the 4. Approval of Marc minutes as presented. Minutes: 5 ayes 0 nays March 26, 1984 Motion Carried Clerk/Administrator Pauley asked that an Item 4A be added to the agenda, the public hearing for the vacation of St, Stephen Street and a drainage easement, for 7:50 PM. There were no residents requests or comments from the 5. Residents Re - floor, quests and Comments from the Floor Motion/Second: Linke/Blanchard to approve the con- 6. Approval of sent agenda, as presented, and waive the reading of Consent Agenda the resolutions. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried I Motion/Second: McCarty/Doty to table the second read- 7. 2nd Reading and ing an a option of Ordinance No, 357, adopting the Adoption of 1983 long-term financial plan, until the public hearing Ordinance No, at 7:40 PM on April 23, 1984. 357 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Mounds View City Council April 9 1984 Rneular Meeting � t — Page Two ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Maya: McCarty explained the Charter requires the long term financial plan to include a public hearing. Jack Martin, 8402 Pleasant View Drive, questioned 8. Consideration where the streetlights would be placed. Petition for Pleasant View Mayor McCarty explained the Council has a recommends- Drive Street- tion for the placement of the lights, based upon lights Staff's evaluation, but they have not approved it yet. Clerk/Administrator made a presentation, showing the proposed locations for the four lights. Mr. Martin stated he was against having the lights installed, as he has lived there for seven years and does not see the need for them. He added a number of the residents do not want them as they are tacky in appearance and provide a nuisance with the pole and light shining, and would hurt the neighborhood's appearance. He stated he would be willing to consider a nicer appearing streetlight, Mayor McCarty explained the Council is very concerned with the health, safety and welfare issue involved, and they have received a great deal of input from Staff over the years, on what is the best way to accomplish the health, safety and welfare goals. He added he agrees the lights are not ornamental and asked if the property owners would be willing to pay for a more ornamental fixture. Clerk/Administrator Pauley explained there is no cost to the City to have the lights installed, and they pay $5.60 per month per light, to NSP, for their use. Mr. Martin stated he would be agreeable to paying the extra cost. John Davis, 8392 Pleasant View Drive, stated he was speaking for both himself and his neighbor, Darrell Gorham, 8391 Pleasant View Drive, and they are both against the lights, due to asthetic standards, as their neighborhood is very attractive right now. He added they are concerned with the children who play in the street now, and would continue to do so at night, if lights were installed. He also stated that for security purposes, any break-ins would most likely come through the back, and streetlights would just serve to shadow back yards more. Mrs. Pat Martin, 8402 Pleasant View Drive, stated she agreed with the opinions given already. Jim Pfaffendort, 8401 Pleasant View Drive, stated that as far as children playing ' the street, it was the Mounds View Citv Hall April 9, 198+ Regular Meeting c[ ) Page Three --_--------------------- :C_'—��i-1�.-1—u,'L --------- ------------ n drivers responsibility to use caution. He stated his main concern is with security, and he feels the lights would help in that respect. Steve Olson, 8412 Pleasant View Drive, stated he shares Mr. Martin's concern with appearance. He stated he did feel streetlights would be helpful as far as safety is concerned, and he would be supportive of looking at the additional cost for ornamental lights. Ted Amozi, 8350 Pleasant View Drive, stated he was in favor of having the lights installed, as there have been a number of break-ins in the area, and he feels the lights would be helpful. Motion/Second: Doty/Blanchard to approve the Pleasant View streetlights installation, 5 ayes 0 nays Considerable discussion occurred before the vote was taken on the motion. Counciimember Doty explair d that he was in favor of the installation as far mc_e residents signed the petition in favor of the lights, then those who were speaking against them, and he is also concerned with the safety issue. Councilmember Hankner suggested the City check into putting a different light in the area of opposition, if those residents are willing to pay for it. Mayor McCarty noted that if it was done in front of only one piece of property, it would look out of place and could cause problems. DeeAnn Amozi, 8350 Pleasant View Drive, stated she had started the petition for the installation of the lights and noted that some lights seem to be softer in appearance than others. Clerk/Administrator Pauley explained that all exist- ing streetlights will be converted to sodium, which is yellowish in tone, which is what all new street- lights are, as NSP has the manpower available. Mr. Davis noted that there is opposition to the place- ment of a light at 8392-8402 Pleasant View from three adjacent property owners. He explained the owner at 8391 Pleasant View had originally signed the petition but then changed mind. He presented Clerk/Administrator Pauley will a note from the resident, indicating his change. Motion Carried Mounds View City Council �r'`. April 9, 1984 Regular Meeting �A L. Page Four ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Mayor McCarty noted that in many spots on the petition, one person signed for two people, and questioned if that would be valid. Attorney Meyers clarified that the Council, at its discretion, can decide if the names are valid. Motion/Second: McCarty/Linke to amend the previous motion, t—hat it stand as read, with the stipulation not to install between 8392 and 8402 Pleasant View Drive, at this time. 4 ayes 1 nay Motion Carried Mayor McCarty explained because the petition does have many people who signed for two, he would be willing to hold off on that particular location until the questions are resolved. He added that since several residents are in favor of having the lights installed, those should not be held up. He also expressed a concern for the safety, and stated he would rather have the area lighted. Councilmember Linke stated he agreed, and they should look at that particular location again. Councilmember Doty explained he had voted against the amendment as most of the people on that section of Pleasant View have signed the petition, in favor of the installation. Mayor McCarty closed the regular meeting and opened 4A, Public Hearing: public hearing for the St. Stephen Street vacation Vacation of St. and drainage easement. Stephen Street and Drainage Chris Anderson, of Christopher Companies, stated Easement they are in favor of the vacation. Mayor McCarty closed the public hearing and reopened the regular meeting at 7:59 PM. Motion Second: McCarty/Linke to approve the first reading ot Ordinance No, 359, an ordinance vacating a portion of St. Stephen Street and a drainage ease- ment, and waive the reading. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Councilmember Doty asked if the flood plain checklist had been done, Clerk/Administrator Pauley replied he would look into it. 41 Mounds View City Council n{ April 9, 1984 Regular Meeting Page Five - .. Mayor McCarty closed the regular meeting and opened 9. Public Hearing: the public hearing at 8:00 PM. Povlitzki's Off 10 Mayor McCarty explained that several months earlier Operations the Council had been approached, and after the re- quired work by Staff and the Council, had granted a license transfer from the Anchor Inn to Povlitzki's Off 10. He explained the applicant was investigated and his record gave no indication of any justifiable cause to withhold the transfer of the license, so the transfer was approved. Since then, complaints have been received from the neighbors regarding the noise, parking and operating conditions. He explained the public hearing was scheduled to allow the concerns to be stated, so the owner could address them. James Parren,. 2288 Highway 10, stated the property had originally been sold for a restaurant at that location, and he objects to having a bar there, and feels the Council was in error in granting the license. Attorney.Meyers explained the property does have the proper zoning, and there was an existing liquor license for the premise, with the request being to transfer the liquor and restaurant licenses, He added the owner is fully within the law with his operation, Attorney Meyers recommended the City initiate the hearing procedure for all licenses in the future. He also explained there was no reason to deny the applicant his license, and the nuisance issue is another story. Mayor McCarty stated that, based on complaints he had received personally, the residents would have to make a formal complaint, as nothing can be done until one is received. Grace Swiggn, 5309 Greenfield, stated she can now hear faint music in her home, with her windows closed, and expressed concern for when the windows would be open in the summer. She also stated she would like the Greenfield exit closed, to keep the traffic off her street. David Carlson, 5297 Edgewood, stated his driveway is directly across from the Edgewood exit for Povlitzki's, and that he had spoken to Mr. Povlitzki and understands the exit will be closed off. He stated he has no problems with the operation as it is now, and has not heard or seen ' anything that is untoward. Mr. Carlson stated he feels Mr. Povlitzki has a right to operate his business, as long as it is under control, Ron Michna, 5297 Edgewood, questioned if there would be :'� April 9, 1984 Mounds View City Council � 1 Page Six Regular Meeting------- - -- -----�--------• -i'W---------------- ----- any problems with the City, if the Greenfield and Edgewood exits are closed, as Mr. Povlitzki is e explained that when the Anchor agreeable to it. HNissan that those Innas texits hwere srequired bytold by rthe firmer r ecode. Clerk/Administrator Pauley stated he had spoken with Fire Chief Fagerstrom regarding closing off those curb cuts, and that while he wants to study the preliminarymake approvalthere to closing hazard, has given them off, John McGinn, 5301 Edgewood Drive, stated he has a problem with late night noise, as his bedrooms face Edgewood, and he has also found beer bottles on his lawn. He stated he agrees Mr. Povlitzki has a right to run his business, but he has an obligation to the neighbors. Jeffrey Berg introduced himself as the attorney for Mr. Povlitzki. He explained the hearing was to find out what the citizens are concerned with. He added the facility is relatively new to the Povlitzki's, with alterations being made, and it takes time to smooth the kinks out. He stated Mr. Povlitzki was ' initially concerned with the parking area when he was planning to purchase the property, and he was informed by the City the parking facilities were ademetgwith thee also Planninginted out commissionrto worktonis the issue of parking, and is closing off the two exits to provide additional parking spaces. Mr. Berg explained that with the complaints of unruly guests, whatever establishment has a liquor license and serves drinks, there are some guests who will occassionally get out of hand. He stated he had reviewed the Police reports, and found a total of seven calls made in the months of January, February and March, and not all of them dealt with rowdy behavior. He added there do not appear to be any serious incidents reported to the Police Depart- ment. Mr. Berg stated Mr. Povlitzki is willing to work with the neighbors regarding their concerns, but pointed out there is no proof of complaints or documentation or evidence. Mr, Berg pointed out the Anchor Inn had a capacity of 880, which iswwell within the hile Mr. zparking ki has arequiremecapacity of 350, requirements. Jean McGinn, 5301 Edgewood Drive, stated she had watched an incident out her window, where the Police had been called but just sat in their squad car and callneach Councilmemberhiftithe anoise to Pinuesally. Mounds View City Council I ,. April 9, 1984 Regular Meeting ` Page Seven ------------- ------------ ------- .- ---------------------------- Mr. Michna stated he had called the Police once, but emphasized his complaint was not with the establish- ment but rather with someone who had been stuck in the parking lot, then came over and urinated in his yard. He reported the Police did a breath test of the individual, but he passed. He added that the incident was not connected with Mr. Povlitzki at all, as the individual never went into his establishment. He also stated it is his belief that the Police must observe someone before they can take any action. Mr. Michna stated also that there have been far fewer problems with Mr. Povlitzki than were experienced with the Anchor Inn. Mr. Povlitzki pointed out the McGinn's property is on the corner of County Road H2 and Edgewood, with H2 being a feeder street for the Mermaid, Loose Ends and Donatelle's, and he stated he firmly believes their problem with beer bottles comes from people driving by, as his patrons would not walk across the street to their lawn to throw bottles, then walk back to the parking lot to their cars. Mayor McCarty closed the public hearing and reopened the regular meeting at 8:25 PM. ' Mayor McCarty stated he agrees there is a very good Police record for Povlitzki's, but added that not all incidents are reported. He added the establish- ment itself will determine how many complaints are received. Mayor McCarty stated that noise seems to be the biggest problem and suggested perhaps having an attendent in the parking lot prior to closing, to monitor the situation. Police Chief Ramacher explained that in order for the Police to approach someone, there must be probable cause before any action is taken, and they must either witness it themselves or have a citizens complaint, or an accident must be involved. Mayor McCarty advised Mr. Povlitzki the driveway closings must be coordinated with the Fire Chief. Mr. Povlitzki replied that he was under the impression they had been approved already, as he was before the Planning Comm- ssion at their April 4 meeting, where they approved the closing off of the Edgewood and Greenfield exits. Director Thatcher advised that the Planning Commission recommendation will be before the Council at their next agenda session. Mayor McCarty stated that in terms of the volume of music, from personal experience he feels it could be turned down somewhat. Mrs. Povlitzki replied that they recently broke a contract with a band who Mounds View City Council r- '1 April 9, 1984 Regular Meeting "n Page Eight -------------------------.---..---------------- refused to turn the volume down, with their many requests. She explained the bands they are booking now are country, which is softer. Mayor McCarty pointed out the building is air con- ditioned, so the noise problem should not increase during the summer months. He added that the refuse outside will be a concern, which the Public Works department will keep an eye on. Mayor McCarty stated no formal motion was required from the Council, as the purpose of the public hearing was to get Mr. Povlitzki and the residents together, which had been accomplished. He added Mr. Povlitzki had done a very good job at the former Launching Pad, and he hopes the City will have a good relationship with him in the future. He added that the public hearing will become part of his record. Councilmember Hankner reminded the residents that if they have a complaint, they should file it with the City, so it becomes a matter of record. Mr. Povlitzki questioned why he had been pressured by the Mayor and the City. He and Mayor McCarty got into a heated discussion on the requirements of a restaurant license and Mr. Povlitzki's compliance or non-compliance with serving food, and whether a weiner wheel constituted food service, and whether Staff had told Mr. Povlitzki it was alright to con- sider the Weiner wheel a food operation while the kitchen was under construction. Mr. Berg stated they were under the opinion that a weiner wheel was sufficient as it was on a temporary basis, and Mr. Povlitzki began working on the kitchen from the very beginning. He added it is in full operation now, open for 11 hours a day, and Mr, or Mrs. Povlitzki would be glad to show the Council through the kitchen. Councilmember Hankner reminded the Council they were informed all along about what was happening and what type of food service there was, and what Mr. Povlitzki's plans were for his kitchen. She also stated that he was within the State statutes, and he has been a good businessman and is willing to work with the residents. Mr. Michna asked that it be noted on the record that Mr. Povlitzki has agreed to replace the fence that was knocked down during the Anchor Inn operation. Mayor McCarty asked Clerk/Administrator Pauley to advise the Council of which Staff member told Mr. Povlitzki it was alright to use the weiner wheel. Mounds View City Council Regular Meeting -------------------------------- agelNine1984 P -------------------------------- Mrs. Povlitzki asked the Council why their ex -establish- ment, Loose Ends, was allowed to operate now without a food service. She asked the Council to review their operation and be fair in monitoring all similar businesses. Motion/Second: Linke/Hankner to call a ten minute recess. 5 ayes 0 nays The meeting was called back to order at 8:53 PM. Mr. Povlitzki apologized to Mayor McCarty for an erroneous statement he had made earlier in the meeting, regarding a mistaken identity. Clerk/Administrator Pauley stated his memo of April 4, 1984 to the Council provides the history of the case, along with supporting documentation. He explained the discussion tonight would be the third step in the grievance appeal, with the fourth step being submittal of the grievance to the Minnesota Bureau of Mediation Services, and the fifth step being �. arbitration. Tim Connors, of Local No. 49, stated he was represent- ing Mr. Decheine, and he feels the one day suspension given was out of line. He added he feels that if the people involved were put under oath, the truth would come out. He added that the letters of February 16 and 22 indicate discrepencies. Mr. Connors stated he felt it was a waste of his time to have to come and sit through the Council meeting, as he had requested to go directly to the fourth step of the grievance appeal. Clerk/Administrator Pauley explained to Mr. Connor that Mounds View does not have a City Manager form of government, and it would be a significant oversite on his part to not follow the proper procedure and have the third step. Motion Carried 10. Consideration 3rd Step Grievance Appe of Public Work Employee Larry Decheine Councilmember Hankner stated there was some confusion with the information listed in the letters of February 16 and 22. Motion/Second: McCarty/Blanchard that the Council ratify ttions of the Clerk/Administrator and instruct him to go to the next step in this matter. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Mounds View City Council ' April 9, 1984 Page Ten R.e.pular Meeting B, ---------------------------------------------------- Motion/Second: Hankner/Linke to authorize Staff 11, Considerar' Formatior topublish the notice to the residents that a Task Forc, Task Force is being formed, with appointments to Council, with Consider City the Task Force to be by the recommendation expected back by September 1, 1984. Council and a The purpose of the Task Force will be to research to the City ission Compensation the current level of compensation paid Council and proposed compensation for commissions and committees. Motion Carried 4 ayes 1 nay Mayor McCarty stated he voted against the motion as he feels the $200 per month compensation he receives as a Councilmember is sufficient to cover his expenses, but he is concerned, however, with the time commission and committee members put in, without receiving compensation. Councilmember Hankner explained the intent of the Task Force is to research all bodies in the City and make their recommendations, and that did not necessarily mean a raise for the Council. Director Thatcher reported the quality of drinking months, 12. Report of, Director water in the City found has been to be tested every six acceptable. He reported Public WoL / and it has been they will continue testing on the six month schedule, Community Dvlp but will not have to test all six wells every six months. Director Thatcher recommended to the Council the hiring of an individual to work as an independent contractor for the City for the MSA street project for 1984. He explained the individual he would recommend would like to work for the City as a temporary employee, rather than an independent contractor, and he would be willing to work at $9/hour as a temporary employee, versus $11/hour as an independent contractor. Attorney Meyers explained that an independent contractor would be responsible for his own workers compensation and insurance, and the City would not be responsible for unemploymemt, negligent acts and so forth, whereas as a temporary employee, he would take on those attributes. He added, however, that even though the individual may be called an inde- pendent contractor, he may legally be deemed an employee, 1 Mounds View City Council April 9, 1984 Regular Meeting �y� ,, Page Eleven Motion/Second: McCarty/Blanchard to authorize the City/Administrator to hire Brian D. Hoffman at a rate of $9.00 per hour as a temporary: full-time employee in the position of civil engineer technician. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Clerk/Administrator Pauley explained the $2 per hour difference in salary would cover the necessary ex- penses for Mr. Hoffman, but would not cover health insurance. Attorney Meyers reviewed the proposed agreement with 13. Report of Grant Merritt, to act as co -counsel in the Anoka Attorney County/Blaine Airport expansion, to specifically provide expertise in environmental questions. He added he has no objection to a co -counsel. Mayor McCarty reviewed the history of why a co -counsel was sought. Motion/Second: McCarty/Doty to authorize entering into t 5agreement with Grant Merritt. 5 ayes 0 nays Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported the Finance Director will have to go through the budget to deter- mine where the funds will come from. Motion: Hankner to amend the previous motion to add t at it is contingent upon identification of funds by the City Council. 5 ayes 0 nays Councilmember Doty had no report. Councilmember Linke had no report. Councilmember Hammer had no report. Councilmember Blanchard reported that the Planning Commission, at their April 4 meeting, asked that the City contact Frank Kampel to see if he would be willing to attend the controversial rezonings scheduled for May and June. She added that the entire Planning Commission plans on attending. Clerk/Administrator Pauley explained the funds could come from the unexpended salary fund for the Community Development department. Motion Carried Motion Carried 14. Reports of Councilmembers Mounds View City Council I April 9, 1984 Regular Meeting Page a Twelve ;----=---y--*------------•--- ---- -- Motion/Second: Blanchard/Hankner to hire Frank Kampel as a consultant. 5 ayes 0 nays Mayor McCarty stated that Mr. Povlitzki stated that Staff was aware of the type of food operation he had on Sunday, and asked for a clarification, along with a clarification of the restaurant intent. Mayor McCarty also stated he had never directed Staff to forego any public hearing, and the statement to that effect made by Mr. Povlitzki was totally erroneous. Clerk/Administrator Pauley stated he would provide the Council with a memo regarding the Povlitzki situation. Clerk/Administrator reported Mr. Waste has seeded his property on Highway 10 and requested the release of the fill permit security of $1,500. He added the City generally does not release the security until it is known if the seed has taken. Mayor McCarty explained that the more stringent requirements generally apply to contractors who might be leaving the City, but they all know Mr. Waste. Motion/Second: McCarty/Linke to release the $1,500 T�Jll permit security for Bob Waste. 5 ayes 0 nays Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported Cy Smythe would like to discuss the labor contract for 1984 for the Police Department with the Council, and has some possible agreements that might be entered into before artibration. He stated the meeting would be a closed door meeting. Motion/Second: Linke/Hankner to set a closed, executive session of the Council on April 30 at 6 PM for the purpose of discussing labor contracts. 5 ayes 0 nays Clerk/Administrator Pauley reminded the Council that a letter of recommendation regarding the appoint- ment of the Metropolitan Council Chairman is needed by April 10. He recommended the City does not send one. Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported the Administrative Secretary has submitted her resignation, effective April 27, and stated he has advertised for a replace- ment, at $6,80 - $7,40 per hour, an' hl,; had quite a 15. Motion Carried Report of Administrator Motion Carried Motion Carried Mounds View CityCouncil April 9, 1984 L Page Thirteen Rogular Meeting Log �`::� •• g --------------------------------------------------------------------- few responses already. Mayor McCarty suggested hiring a temporary for the position. Clerk/Administrator Pauley explained the charge for a temporary is about 50 percent higher than the regular salary. Motion/Second: McCarty/Hankner to accept, with regrets, tFe—resignation of Patt Fry. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Clerk/Administrator Pauley asked authorization for the installation of emergency lights for the lower level of City Hall, which acts as an emergency shelter for the mobile homes in the City. He reviewed the quote from Bacon Electric, for $1,240, and reported it would be charged to the Civil Defense account. Motion/Second: McCarty/Linke to approve the bid of Bacon Electric, for $1,240, with the funds to come from the contingency account. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported the City's application for membership in the Metropolitan Legislative Commission has been approved, and he will be meeting with a representative from there in the near future. Clerk/Aministrator Pauley asked the Council to meet with the representatives of Transplan, Inc. from New York, regarding their proposal for the airport study, The Council agreed to meet with them on May 1 and 2. Clerk/Administrator Pauley reviewed the response of the Environmental Quality Board to the petition for an environmental assessment work sheet. The Council concurred to have the letter sent. Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported the City had just received a petition from Mounds View Mobile Home Park residents for the permanent opening of the access road to the Mounds View Mobile Home Park at the corner of Belle Lane and Raymond Avenue. He stated it would be given to the Police, Fire and Public Works/Community Development departments for research. C�1 Attorney Meyers advised referring to the original minutes on the mobile home park, and find out the reason it was made just an emergency access. ^ April 9, 1984 y r" p Pa Mounds View_Cit__CouncilPage Fourteen _I -.w_-_ ,--� _-___-_-_-_____ o.,,.,nsr MaPtine P _ ____ Y yI".I--I -- Motion/Second: Hankner/Linke to adjourn the meeting 16. Adjournment at 9.53 PM. :lotion Carried 5 ayes 0 nays Respectfully submitted, Donald F. Pauley Clerk/Administrator F DATE APPROVED: 4/9/84 PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA Regular Meeting March 26, 1984 Mounds View City Hall 2401 Hwy. 10, Mounds View, MN 55112 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ The Mounds View City Council was called to order by 1. Call to Order Mayor McCarty at 7:30 PM on March 26, 1984. MEMBERS PRESENT: Councilmembers Blanchard, Doty, 2. Roll Call Lin eve,, Hankner and Mayor McCarty, ALSO PRESENT: City Attorney Meyers, Clerk/Admini- strator Pauley and Public Works/Community Development Director Thatcher. Park Director Anderson explained that a contact had 3. Presentation o been made through the Groveland Park Association to Grant to Park Honeywell approximately a year ago, soliciting funds Department fro for the City parks, and that Mr. Dick Pickering was Honeywell present, as a representative from Honeywell, to make a presentation to the City this evening. Mr. Pickering stated Honeywell feels this is a very innovative approach to improving the City parks, and that many of their employees at the New Brighton plant live in Mounds View, and Honeywell is very interested in the quality of life and quality of work in Mounds View. Mr. Pickering presented a check to Mayor McCarty for $2,000. Mayor McCarty and the Council thanked Mr. Pickering and Honeywell for their donation. Councilmember Doty asked that the Pledge of Allegiance be said. The Pledge of Allegiance was said. Motion/Second: Linke/Blanchard to approve the March 4. Approval of mutes as corrected. Minutes: 5 ayes 0 nays March 12, 1984 Motion Carried There were no residents requests or comments from the 5. Residents `loor. Requests and Comments from the Floor Mounds View City Council Regular Meeting ----------------------------- March 26, 1964 Page Two Clerk/Administrator Pauley advised that, due to a 6 change in the publication date of the New Brighton Bulletin, notices will have to be in to the paper earlier, and the public hearings under Items C and D would have to be changed to April 23, 1984, and recommended that Item F be moved up to 8:00PMon April 9. He explained that the change in publication will require the Council to set public hearings four weeks in advance now. Motion/Second: Doty/Hankner to approve the Consent Agenda, as amended, and waive the reading of the resolutions. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion/Second: Doty/Linke to approve the first reading 7 o Ordinance No. 357, adopting the 1983 long term financial plan, and waive the reading. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion/Second: Doty/Blanchard to remove the item Irom the table. 5 ayes 0 nays Approval Consent . a Motion Carried 1st Reading of Ord.. No. 357 Motion Carried 8. Remove raircnIJ Avenue P c ImprovemI from Tabl Consideration of Planning Commission Recommendation Clerk/Administrator Pauley reviewed Staff's recom- mendation that the easement vacation for the Gale/Yost Addition be tabled until April 9, 1984, and that on April 2, the City Council consider development agreement requirement and project approval, which would indicate the portion on Fairchild necessary for public right-of-way for the proposed development. Motion/Second: McCarty/Hankner to continue the Gale/ Yost Aaaclun with theleasement lconditiiminaryonsatoubeic nsidereApril d 84 on April 9, 1984. 5 ayes 0 nays Mayor McCarty closed the regular meeting and opened the Christopher Companies public hearing at 7:41 PM. Perry Bolin, the architect with Hammel, Green and Abrahamson, Inc.. presented n drawing of the property Motion Carried Motion Carried 9. Public H g Christop Companies, Residential PU Mounds View City Council March 26, 1984 Regular Meeting Page Three ----------------------------------------------------------------------- and project, and reviewed the proposed development. Mayor McCarty inquired if any of the north side of the project would touch the flood plain. Mr. Bolin explained that the flood plain is at 902, and the project will be between 903 and 903k when it is finished. Director Thatcher showed the existing drainage ditch on the property, and reported it was John Johnson's opinion that the ditch could be .filled and there would still be adequate storage. Mr. Bolin presented a sketch of the flood plain area. Alex Levitan, 2051 Long Lake Road, New Brighton, asked what the rental range would be on the units. Mayor McCarty explained to Mr. Levitan that Mr. Anderson would not be required to answer that question as it had no bearing on the purpose of the public hearing. Lucy Levitan, 2051 Long Lake Road, New Brighton, asked if there would be common hallways in the buildings, and what the development timetable would be. Mr. Bolin showed on their drawing where there would be two separate entrances for each building, and there would be no common hallways. Mayor McCarty explained the Council would be dis- cussing the development timetable after the public hearing was concluded. Mayor McCarty closed the public hearing at 7:50 PM. Mayor McCarty reviewed that the applicant's request is for approval of a planned unit development, including a conditional use permit for the flood plain excavation, a flood plain use permit and a major subdivision. Clerk/Administrator Pauley reminded the Council that they had received Resolution No. 102-84, from the Planning.Commission, recommending approval of the development. Mayor McCarty asked if the correspondence from the Commissioner of the DNR is needed prior to approval. City Attorney Meyers advised that if the Council approves the project, the developer must enter into a development agreement, with which he must meet all the requirements, and that any motion made by the Council would be contingent upon the applicant entering into the development agreement. Mounds View City Council March 26, 1984 Regular Meeting Page Four ------------------------------------ ------------------------------------ Motion/Second: McCarty/Linke to approve the proposal or ristop er Companies for a residential planned unit development, including a conditional use permit for flood plain excavation, flood plain use permit, and major subdivision, contingent upon compliance with the Mounds View Planning Commission Resolution No. 102-84, and successfully entering into a development agreement with the City of Mounds View. 5 ayes 0 nays Clerk/Administrator Pauley advised that approval is required from the DNR and he is not sure how long it could take. He added that he understands Mr. Anderson would like to start construction this year and build in phases. Director Thatcher advised the Council he plans to solicite bids for the 1984 street sweeping and sanitary sewer cleaning, televising, foaming and/or grouting. He estimated the cost for the televising, cleaning and foaming to be between $10,000 and $15,000, and the street sweeping to be $5,000, with the money budgeted for both projects. Clerk/Administrator Pauley explained that the City plans to televise lines this year that were foamed in 1982, as well as foam the lines that are scheduled for 1984. Motion/Second: McCarty/Blanchard to approve the so I ita on of bids for the 1984 street sweeping, and sanitary sewer cleaning, televising, foaming and/or grouting. 5 ayes 0 nays Director Thatcher reported he will be discussing the TKDA electrical analysis of the water system at the next agenda session. Director Thatcher reported the permit is due into the MPCA on April 1 for the backwash of water from filtration plants 2 and 3 into Rice Creek, which is a standard permit form. He added it is filled out and he will be giving it to Mayor McCarty for his signature. Director Thatcher presented the Council with a map of the City, with MSA streets highlighted, He stated he is concerned with roads that are in a driveable condition, with the worst road_ in the City being Silver Lake Road between County Road H and County Road I. He also pointed out that MSA requires curb and gutter. Motion Carried 10. Approve Solici- tation of Bids for 1984 Street Sweeping and Sanitary Sewer Cleaning, Tele- vising, Foaming and/or Gr11ng Motion Carried 11. Report of Director of Public Works/ Community Dvlp, J Mounds View City Council Regular Meeting ---------------------------------------------- Mayor McCarty questioned having to replace or upgrade the storm sewer for any additional runoff. Director Thatcher replied he has not yet determined if any upgrading would be required. Mayor McCarty stated he would like to know the total project cost to complete the project to where it would be acceptable to get the release of MSA funds. Councilmember Links asked if the estimates given include sidewalks. Director Thatcher replied they did not, just the street, curb and gutter. Director Thatcher advised that bids should be accepted by June 1, and that he would have estimates ready for the next agenda session. It was agreed to discuss the issue further then. Attorney Meyers reported the City has received two proposals relative to the evaluation of the Anoka County/Blaine Airport master plan. He reviewed the proposals submitted by Transplant, Inc., and CH2M Hill, and advised that one more is expected. He recommended the City have all three firms come in, at the City's expense, and meet with them, and then make a decision on which firm to use. He also recommended that a budget be appropriated up to $10,000. Motion/Second: McCarty/Doty to authorize Staff to set up a special budget for the air uLt evaluation consultant, in the amount of up to �10,000, from the contingency account. 5 ayes 0 nays March 26, 1984 Page Five -------------- 12. Report of Attorney Motion Carried. Councilmember Blanchard reported the Planning 13. Reports of Commission has been very busy, and they are Councilmember; in the process of working on an ordinance regarding on -street parking, which they will be forwarding to the Council. Councilmember Doty had no report. Councilmember Linke reported he had attended the Ramsey County League dinner on March 21, which many Legislators attended, and it was a very informational meeting. Councilmember Hankner had no report. i4umlds View City Council March 26, 198y Regular Meeting Page Six ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Mayor McCarty reported he had received a letter from the Governor's office, inviting him to a meeting on April 2 regarding the appointment of the Met Council Chairman, and also to bring the Citys concerns to the attention of the Governor and his Staff. He asked that Clerk/Administrator Pauley attend in his place, as he had committments for that day that could not be rescheduled. Mayor McCarty also reported he had received a letter from someone interested in taking over a game room in the City. Clerk/Administrator Pauley advised that Attorney Meyers is reviewing it and will be giving the Council his opinion. Mayor McCarty reviewed what had happened at the meeting he attended, in Blaine regarding the racetrack, and stated that he had taken no position and given no indication that the City had any position, pro or con. Clerk/Administrator Pauley advised he had received a memo today from Consulting Engineers Diversified, which was directed to the Racing Commission, in response to Mayor McCarty's comments at the meeting. Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported they had received 14. Report of a thank you note from the Paradise family, for the Administrator flowers. Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported he and represen- tatives from the City of Blaine had met and interviewed an applicant for the Energy Coordinator position, and he will be making a recommendation to the Council at their April 9 meeting. Clerk/Administrator Pauley asked the Council to set a date for Clean -Up Day. It was agreed to go with May 19, with Staff to make the arrangements and place an article in the newsletter. Motion/Second: Linke/Blanchard to adjourn the meeting 15. Adjournment a t 8-2—PF-7— 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried