Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packets - 1984/05/29CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS CITY OF MOUND: 'EW May 29, 1984 6:00 p.m. Executive Meeting 1. Executive Session - Discussion with Grant Merrit regarding designation of 6(GU to perform EIS on Anoka County - Blaine Airport Improvements 7:30 p.m. Regular Meeting A G E N D A 1. Call to order 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Roll Call - Linke, Hankner, Blanchard, Doty, McCarty 4. Approval of Minutes: May 14, 1984 (Received with 5/21/84 Packet) 5. Public Hearings: - 7:45 p.m. Rezoning of 7185 Silver Lake Road from B-3 and R-3 to R-1 First Reading of Ordinance No. 364 Amending the Municipal Code of Mounds l View by Amending Chapter 41 Entitled, "Specific Rezonings" - 8:00 p.m. Rezoning of 2975 Highway 10 from B-3 to R-2 First Reading of Ordinance No. 365 Amending the Municipal Code of Mounds View by Amending Chapter 41 Entitled, "Specific Rezonings" - 8:15 p.m. Rezoning of 2901 Highway 10 from B-3 to R-1 First Reading of Ordinance No. 366 Amending the Municipal Code of Mounds View by Amending Chapter 41 Entitled, "Specific Rezonings" - 8:30 p.m. Rezoning of 2841 Highway 10 from B-3 to R-2 First Reading of Ordinance No. 367 Amending the Municipal Code of Mounds View by Amending Chapter 41 Entitled, "Specific Rezonings" AGENDA ,MAY 29, 1984 PAGE TWO I 5. Public Hearings: (continued) - 8:45 p.m. Rezoning of Lots 1 and 3, Block 1 and Lots 1 and 2, Block 2 Pinecrest Addition from R-3 to I-1 First Reading of Ordinance No. 368 Amending the Municipal Code of Mounds View by Amending Chapter 41 Entitled, "Specific Rezonings" 9:00 p.m. Major Subdivision (2 lots into 5) of property located at 8203 and 8227 Groveland Road known as the Gayle -Yost Addition (Bring previous handout for this item). 6. Residents Requests and Comments from the Floor ---------------------------------------------------------- CITIZENS: BEFORE SPEAKING PLEASE GIVE YOUR FULL NAME AND ADDRESS FOR -THE -MINUTES ------------------- ---------------------------------- 7. Approval of Consent Agenda ITEM A. Approve Resolution No. 1737 Requesting to Lend -Lease an Intoxilyzer 5000 from the State of Minnesota Department of Public Safety ITEM B. Approve Mayor's Appointment of Robert Knieff and Linda Bauman to the Energy Council with Terms Expiring on December 31, 1986. ITEM C. Approve Recommendation of and Authorize Clerk -Administrator to Enter into a 12-Month Lease Agreement with Copy Sales, Inc. for the Rental of a MITA 312 RE pursuant to their Proposal Dated April 11, 1984 and Contingent Upon the Successful Cancellation of the Current Photocopier Lease Agreement with Copy Duplicating Products, Inc. ITEM D. Approve Resolution No. 1735 Opposing Industrial Development Bond Per Capita Limitations ITEM E. Approve Resolution No. 1743 Approving a 60 Day Extension to the Project Completion Deadline for Dynamic Designers ITEM F. Approve Resolution No. 1744 Authorizing Release of $15,000 Security Bond Provided by the Mermaid Supper Cluo Pursuant to Development Agreement No. 78-13 AGENDA ,MAY 29, 1984 PAGE THREE 7. Approval of Consent Agenda (continued) ITEM G. Set Public [searing for 8:45 p.m. on June 25, 1984 for the Rezoning of Dailey Knolls from R-1 to R-2 and the Issuance of a Conditional Use Permit for Alteration in a Wetland ITEM H. Set Public Hearing for 8:30 p.m. on June 25, 1984 for the Rezoning of the West Side of Sunnyside Road between Woodcrest Drive and County Road H from R-1 to R-2 ITEM I. Award Contract to Bacon Electric in the Amount of $3,745 for Electrical Work on Wells 3,5, and 6 and Booster Pump No. 2 ITEM J. Authorize the Hiring of William Heaton as a Full -Time Temporary Worker in the Public Works Department for a 60 Day Period at $5.00 Per Hour ITEM K. Approve Resolution No. 1739 Designating Retained Earnings of the Water and Sewer Funds as Reserves for Water and Sewer Main Breaks ITEM L. Approve Resolution No. 1740 Designating Retained Earnings of the Water and Sewer Funds as Reserves for Future Maintenance and Capital Improvement Projects ITEM M. Licenses for Approval GENERAL Gorco Construction - New Rick A. Perrozzi - New A. Binder & Son - New SEWER & WATER Sarah Contracting, Inc. - New HEATING AND AIR CONDITIONING Kelo Heating & Air - New MASONRY Mid -American Concrete Specialists, Inc. - New OTHER Donnelly Stucco Company (Stucco) - New D.W. Fencing (Fence) - New PROFESSIONAL BOXING Tycoon, Inc. - New v ITEM N. Approve Resolution No. 1742 Approving Just and Correct C.aims Against City Funds AGENDA .— MAY 29, 1984 PAGE FOUR 8. Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance No. 358 Amending the Municipal Code of Mounds View by Amending Chapter 41 Entitled; "Specific Rezoning" 9. Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance No. 360 Amending the Municipal Code of Mounds View by Amending Chapter 41 Entitled, "Specific Rezoning" 10, Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance No. 361 Amending the Municipal Code of Mounds View by Amending Chapter 41 Entitled, "Specific Rezoning" 11. Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance No. 362 Amending the Municipal Code of Mounds View by Amending Chapter 41 Entitled, "Specific Rezoning" 12. Report of Director of Public Works/Community Development 13. Report of Attorney 14. Report of Councilmembers - Linke, Iiankner, Blanchard, Doty, McCarty 15.- Report of Administrator 16. Adjournment MEMO TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: CLERK-ADMINISTRATO DATE: MAY 24, 1984 SUBJECT: GRANT MERRITT BILLING Enclosed is a billing statement from Grant Merritt in the amount $5,233.25 for the period of May 3 through May 17, 1984. Combined with the previous bill we received for the month of April Mr. Merritt's billings to the City of Mounds View for approximately 45 days of service now amount to $11,007.30. As with the other billing statement you have previously received it would be appropriate for you to question Mr. Merritt regarding his billing at your special session with him at 6:00 p.m. on May 29th. You will note that certain portions of the billing statement are highlighted by me to indicate those areas where I question the validity of the billing as these contacts were not authorized by myself or City Attorney Meyers. LAW OfrICCS '15-2N THOMPSON 6 KLAVERKAMP O�Z+ ��. A PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION 4444 IDS CENTER BO SOUTH EIGHTH STREET MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 (6121339.4546 r-: w MAY 22. 1954 9396 1 CITY OF MOU'IDS VIE:! ANOKA COUNTY/BLAINE ATTN.: DONALD F. DAULEY AIRPORT EXPANSION 2401 HIGHWAY 10 MOUNDS VIE'd. 114 55112 PLEASE RETURN UPPER PORTION WITH YOUR REMITTANCE FOR ALL LEGAL SERVICES RFNDERFO MAY 74, 1984 THRU MAY 17r 19°4 5/03/84 GJM ;+"' .Nf_:•W.ZLEE.ANN:.SPORRI; TERRY MOJTGOMERY OF GOV'S OFFICE, TOM TRIPPLETT, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING RE EGO ET 4L 5/97/84 GJM CO'IPLF.TE REVIEW OF 1980 HEARING TAPES; CONF W/TOM KALITOWSKIP TOM ANDERSON; &EE,A&NjTSfMJjU RICHARD MEYERS; PREPARE. FOR FRB MEETING 5/07/84 RNS CONFERENCE WITH G. MERRITT 5/08/84 GJM CONE AT MAC 14DOTS W/COUNSEL THOMAS ANDERSON; NUMEROUS TEL CONFS W/T KALITOWSKI 5 NEd MEDIA RE NEXT STEPS 0'4 E A W ; (iQR I�iI O�Tyk�I 5/08/34 RNS CONFERENCE WITH GB MERRITT 5/09/84 GJM CONE W/TOM KALITOWSKI AT EOB; CONE W/STAFF OF PCA 8 EOB; CONF W/R MEYERS RE STRATEGY 5/39/84 RNS RESEARCH RE: FEDERAL PRE-EMPTION OF NOISE PROBLEM 5/10/84 GJM MEETINGS W/EOR STAFF IN ST. PAULA ;EV,ALUATION rnOF EVIDENCE 5/11 /84 GJM NNF,'N/DR .'J.OE._MENG K WORK ON TAPES 5/11/84 GJM CONF W/STRVE FTADLERA MEMBER OF PCA BD; gEVIEW HEA1Ny; {Ei i$pO�eE:�s3iaq'i3� !ONCONF WITCH ANDERSON, MAC ATTY 5/11/84 RNS RESEARCH RE FEDERAL NOISE PRE-EMPTION 5/12/84 GJM ANALYSIS OF EVIDEI'CE, FINISH REVIEW OF 1983 MAC MAST R_&L,Ay ARING RECORD 5/14/84 GJM MEETING W/RSA R;,-Q;O T/C W/R MEYERS F EEEA'NH� ANALYSIS OF *CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE* THOMPSON 6 KLAVERKAMP COBS AND EOPINM INCURRED BUT NOT WCLUDID W TMS INVOKE MILL RE SUBMITTED AT A LATER DATE LAW OrfICES THOMPSON B KLAVERKAMP A PROP96SIONAL A660CIATION 4444 IDS CENTER SO SOUTH EIGHTH STREET MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 66402 16121 336.4546 NAY 226 1994 9396 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW ATTN.: DONALD F. DAULEY 2401 HIGHWAY 10 MOUNDS VIEIWA NN 55112 1 ANOKA COUNTY/BLAINE AIRPORT EXPANSION PLEASE RETURN UPPER PORTION WITH YOUR REMITTANCE FOR ALL LEGAL SERVICES RENDERED MAY 3, 1984 THRU NAY 17. 1984 MAC RECORDS. OEGIN REVIEW OF 1981 HEARING RY TRA 5/14/84 RNS REVIEW PIASTER PLAN; RESEARCH ON NOISE PRE-EMPTIONA CONFERENCE WITH G. Mr.RRITT 5/15/84 GJM REVIEW 0j, ltl� Y 1, �f RANSCR IPT;® GMAYOR•',OARC�� CONF W/DNR OFFICIALS; CONF W/TOM KALIT0WSKI; f,ON_F '°ALkh&g= CONF 'WITOM ANDERSON OF MAC 5/15/84 RNS RESEARCH 5/16184 GJM PREPARATIONS FOR MAC MTG IN MAY K EOB MTG IN JUNE, NUMFROUS CONFS WITH PUBLIC OFFICIALS AND WITNESS CANDIDATES 5/17/84 GJM CONE W/ASSOC RE STRATEGY; ANALYSIS OF NEXT STEPS TOTAL SERVICES: FOR ALL DISBURSEMENTS AS FOLLOWS: COPYING .60 TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS: TOTAL SERVICES AND DISBURSEMENTS: 1 E5r233.25 $0.60 $5o233.85 J THOMrf:ON 6 KLAVERKAn1, C051B AND LAFINIUI INWNINP OJT bnl 'tC4 NE IM3 IN\Olf( Wiu PC mMIFTED q A LAIp y}L ORDINANCE NO. 364 PM CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE. OF MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF MOUNDS VIEW BY AMENDING CHAPTER 41 ENTITLED, "SPECIFIC REZONINGS" The Council of the City of Mounds View does hereby ordain: 41.19 Pursuant to Chapter 40.23, the Official Mounds View Zoning Map is hereby amended to reflect the following rezoning: 7185 Silver Lake Road rezoned from B-3 and R-3 to R-1, legally known as: Mueller Addition, Block 1 Lot 4 This ordinance shall take effect thirty days after the date of its publication. Read by the City Council of the City of Mounds View on this 29th day of May, 1984. Read and passed by the City Council of the City of Mounds View this __ day of , 1984. ATTEST: Mayor (SEAL) Clerk -Administrator APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Mounds View City Council will meet on Tuesday, May 29, 1984 at 7:45 p.m. at Mounds View City Hall, 2401 Highway 10, Mounds View, Minnesota, 55112 to consider the rezoning from B-3, Highway Business and R-3, Medium Density Residential to R-1, Single Family Residential for the property located at 7185 Silver Lake Road, legally known as: Mueller Addition Block 1, Lot 4 Anyone desiring to be heard with reference to this matter may be heard at this meeting. 0. Donald F. Pauley Clerk -Administrator (Bulletin: May 16, 1984) I d—i 1 Icy) 5 ORDINANCE N0. 365 SO r CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCEAMENDING CHAPTER G41 ENTITLEDTHE , A"W E SPECIFIC REZONINGSL CODE OF MOUNDS E The Council of the City of Mounds View does hereby ordain: 41.20 Pursuant to Chapter 40.23, the Official Mounds View Zoning Map is hereby amended to reflect the following rezoning: 2975 Highway 10 rezoned from B-3 to R-2, legally known as: AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 89 E 166 FT OF PART NELY OF HWY OF LOT 13 This ordinance shall take effect thirty days after the date of its publication. Read by the City Council of the City of Mounds View on this 29th day of May, 1984. Read and passed by the City Council of the City of Mounds View this day of i__� 1984. ATTEST: Mayor (SEAL) Clerk -Administrator APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Mounds View City Council will meet on Tuesday, May 29, 1984 at 8:00 p.m. at Mounds View City Hall, 2401 Highway 10, Mounds View, Minnesota, 55112 to consider the rezoning from B-3, Highway Business to R-2, Single and Two Family Residential for the property located at 2975 Highway 10, legally known as: AUDITORS SUBDIVISION NO. 89 E 166 FT OF PART NELY OF HWY OF LOT 13 Anyone desiring to be heard with reference to this matter may be heard at this meeting. Donald F. Pauley Clerk -Administrator (Bulletin: May 16, 1984) J 5 ORDINANCE NO. 366 V 'I6 0 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF MOUNDS VIEW BY AMENDING CHAPTER 41 ENTITLED, "SPECIFIC REZONINGS" The Council of the City of Mounds View does hereby ordain: 41.21 Pursuant to Chapter 40.23, the Official Mounds View Zoning Map is hereby amended to reflect the following rezoning: 2901 Highway 10 rezoned from B-3 to R-1, legally known as: AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 89, SUBJ TO HWY THE FOL: PART OF LOT 32 DESC BEG ON EL LOT 3 100 FT S OF NW COR LOT 50 TH S ON SD L TO NE L OF HWY TH NW ON HWY 32 FT TH NE TO BEG ALSO, EX NWLY TRI PART MEAS 7 FT ON NL AND 100 FT ON ELY L SD TRI; ALL OF LOT 50 This ordinance shall take effect thirty days after the date of its publication. Read by the City Council of the City of Mounds View on this 29th day of May, 1984. Read and passed by the City Council of the City of Mounds View this day of , 1984. ATTEST: Mayor (SEAL) Clerk -Administrator APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Mounds View City Council will meet on Tuesday, May 29, 1984 at 8:15 p.m. at Mounds View City Hall, 2401 Highway 10, Mounds View, Minnesota, 551.12 to consider the rezoning from B-3, Highway Business to R-1, Single Family Residential for the property located at 2901 Highway 10, legally known as: A'1DITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 89, SUBJ TO HWY THE FOL! PART OF LOT 32 DESC BEG ON EL LOT 3 100 FT S OF NW COR LOT 50 TH S ON SD L TO NE L OF HWY TH NW ON HWY 32 FT TH NE TO BEG ALSO, EX NWLY TRI PART MEAS 7 FT ON NL AND 100 FT ON ELY L SD TRI; ALL OF LOT 50 Anyone desiring to be heard with reference to this matter may be heard at this meeting. Donald F. Pauley Clerk -Administrator (Bulletin: May 16, 1984) J 351 ! I t',E0161 Ira ORDINANCE NO. 367 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE. OF MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE MUNICIPAL CODE. OF MOUNDS VIEW BY AMENDING CHAPTER 41 ENTITLED, "SPECIFIC REZONINGS" The Council of the City of Mounds View does hereby ordain: 41.22 Pursuant to Chapter 40.23, the Official Mounds View Zoning Map is hereby amended to reflect the following rezoning: 2841 Highway 10 rezoned from B-3 to R-2, legally known as: AU„ITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 89 SUHJ TO TD PART NELY OF HWY OF LOT 62 This ordinance shall take effect thirty days after the date of its publication. Read by the City Council of the City of Mounds View on this 29th day of May, 1984. Read and passed by the City Council of the City of Mounds View this -- day of , 1984. ATTEST: Mayor (SEAL) Clerk -Administrator APPROVED AS TO FORM: ty Attorney CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Mounds View City Council will meet on Tuesday, May 29, 1984 at 8:30 p.m. at Mounds View City Hall, 2401 Highway 10, Mounds View, Minnesota, 55112 to consider the rezoning from B-3, Highway Business to R-2, Single and Two Family Residential for the property located at 2841 Highway 10, legally known as: AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 89 SUBJ TO RD PART NELY OF HWY OF LOT 62 Anyone desiring to be heard with reference to this matter may be heard at this meeting. 0 Donald F. Pauley Clerk -Administrator (Bulletin: May 16, 1984) E ORDINANCE NO. 368 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF MOUNDS VIEW BY AMENDING CHAPTER 41 ENTITLED, "SPECIFIC REZONINGS" The Council of the City of Mounds View does hereby ordain: 41.23 Pursuant to Chapter 40.23, the Official Mounds View Zoning Map is hereby amended to reflect the following rezoning: 2231 Highway 10 rezoned from R-3 to I-1, legally known as: PINECREST ADDITION, LOTS 1 AND 31 BLOCK 1 AND LOTS 1 AND 2, BLOCK 2 This ordinance shall take effect thirty days after the date of its publication. Read by the City Council of the City of Mounds View on this 29th day of May, 1984. Read and passed by the City Council of the City of Mounds View this day of _ 1984. ATTEST: Mayor (SEAL) Clerk -Administrator APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney ATTENTION OF WEEK CORRECTION FROM PREVIOUSLY CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Mounds View City Council will meet on , TUESDAY, May 29, 1984 at 8:45 p.m. at Mounds View City Hall, 2401 Highway 10, Mounds View, Minnesota, 55112 to consider the rezoning from R-3, High Density Residential to I-1, Light Industrial for the property located at 2231 Highway 10, legally known a:: Pi.necrest Addition, Lots 1 and 3, Block 1 and Lots 1 and 2, Block 2 Anyone desiring to be heard with reference to this matter may be heard at this meeting. Donald F. Pauley Clerk -Administrator (Bulletin: May 2, 1984) If you are unable to attend this meeting but wish to comment on the proposed action please send or deliver your comments to Donald Pauley, Administrator, 2401 Highway #10 St. Paul, Minnesota 55112, Phone #784-3055. I J CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Mounds View City Council will meet on Tuesday, May 29, 1984 at 9:00 p.m, at Mounds View City Hall, 2401 Highway 10, Mounds View, Minnesota, 55112 to consider the major subdivsion (2 lots into 5) for the property located at 8205 and 8227 Groveland Road, legally known as: GALE ADDITION, BLOCK 1, LOT 6 AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 89 r \ SUBJ TO RD THE S 1/4 OF LOT 67 Anyone desiring to be heard with reference to this matter may be heard at this meeting. Donald F. Pauley Clerk -Administrator (Bulletin: May 16, 1984) CONSENT AGENDA n MAY 29, 1984 The Consent Agenda is a technique designed to expedite handling of routine and miscellaneous official business of the City Council. The entire Agenda may ire adopted by the Council in one motion. The motion for adoption is non -debatable and must receive unanimous approval. By request of any individual Councilmember, any item can be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed upon the Regular Agenda for debate. ITEM A. Approve Resolution No. 1737 Requesting to Lend -Lease an lntoxilyzer 5000 from the State of Minnesota Department of Public Safety ITEM B. Approve Mayor's Appointment of Robert Knieff and Linda Bauman to the Energy Council with Terms Expiring on December 31, 1986. ITEM C. Approve Recommendation of and Authorize Clerk -Administrator to Enter into a 12-Month Lease Agreement with Copy Sales, Inc. for the Rental of a MITA 312 RE pursuant to their Proposal Dated April 11, 1984 and Contingent Upon the Successful Cancellation of the Current Photocopier Lease Agreement with Copy Duplicating Products, Inc. ITEM D. Approve Resolution No. 1735 Opposing Industrial Development Bond Per Capita Limitations ITEM E. Approve Resolution No. 1743 Approving a 60 Day Extension to the Project Completion Deadline for Dynamic Designers ITEM F. Approve Resolution No. 1744 Authorizing Release of $15,000 Security Bond Provided by the Mermaid Supper Club Pursuant to Development Agreement No. 78-13 ITEM G. Set Public Hearing for 8:45 p.m. on June 25, 1984 for the Rezoning of Dailey Knolls from R-1 to R-2 and the Issuance of a Conditional Use Permit for Alteration in a Wetland ITEM H. Set Public Hearing for 8:30 p.m. on June 25, 1984 for the Rezoning of the West Side of Sunnyside Road between Woodcrest Drive and County Road H from R-1 to R-2 ITEM I. Award Contract to Bacon Electric in the Amount of $3,745 for Electrical Work on Wells 3,5, and 6 and Booster Pump No. 2 ITEM J. Authorize the Hiring of William Heaton as a Full -Time Temporary Worker in the Public Works Department for a 60 Day Period at $5.00 Per Hour CONSENT AGENDA MAY 29, 1984 PAGE TWO ITEM K. Approve RCSoluLion No. 1739 Designating Retained Earnings of the Water and Sewer Funds as Reserves for Water and Sewer Main Breaks ITEM L. Approve Resolution No. 1740 Designating Retained Earnings of the Water and Sewer Funds as Reserves for Future Maintenance and Capital Improvement Projects ITEM M. Licenses for Approval GENERAL Gorco Construction - New Rick A. Perrozzi - New A. Binder & Son - New SEWER & WATER Sarah Contracting, Inc. - New HEATING AND AIR CONDITIONING Kelo Ifea,.ing & Air - New MASONRY Mid -American Concrete Specialists, Inc. - New OTHER Donnelly Stucco Company (Stucco) - New D.W. Fencing (Fence) - New - PROFESSIONAL BOXING Tycoon, Inc. - New ITEM N. Approve Resolution 11o. 1742 Approving Just and Correct Claims Against City Funds RESOLUTION N0. 1743 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION APPROVING TIME EXTENSION FOR PLANNING CASE 43-791 DYNAMIC DESIGNERS 8-UNIT CONDOMINIUM PROPOSAL WHEREAS, the Mounds View City Council approved Resolution No. 1653 on September 12, 1983 for Case 43-79 for Dynamic Designers 8-unit condominium proposal; and WHEREAS, the Mounds View Code has time requirements for wetland alteration work and final subdivision approval; and WHEREAS, the developers, Dynamic Designers, have had difficulty in obtaining financing due to the economy; and WHEREAS, Dynamic Designers has requested a 60 day extension; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mounds View approves a 60 day extension and further requires that the alteration work be started no later than July 30 and be completed no later than November 1, 1984; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of mounds View also requires that the other requirements for Resolution No. 1653 be completed, final plans and specifications be submitted, and development agreement execution and permit application occur prior to November 1, 1984. ATTEST: (SEAL) Adopted this 29th day of May, 1984. Mayor Clerk -Administrator RESOLUTION NO. 1744 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING RELEASE OF SECURITY FOR DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 78-13 WITH THE MERMAID SUPPER CLUB WITH CONDITIONS WHEREAS, the Mermaid Supper. Club was required to submit a $15,000 security to insure completion of one of Development Agreement No. 78-13 requirements, curb and gutter; and WHEREAS, all conditions of Development Agreement No. 78-13 have been completed with the exception of curb and gutter; and WHEREAS, Mounds View Code Section 44.06 requires that a use such as the Mermaid Supper Club has B6-18 curbing; and WHEREAS, the Mermaid Supper Club owners intend to buy additional land for expansion in the future; and WHEREAS, placement of curbing at this time would be required to be removed at the time of expansion; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mounds View authorizes the release of the $15,000 security for Development Agreement No. 78-13; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mounds View places the owners of the Mermaid Supper Club on notice that with any future expansion of the Mermaid Supper Club facilities, B6-18 curbing will be required for the entire lot. ATTEST: (SEAL) Adopted this 29th day of May, 1984. Mayor Clerk -Administrator RESOLUTION NO. 1739 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION DESIGNATING RETAINED EARNINGS OF THE WATER AND SEWER FUNDS AS RESERVES FOR WATER AND SEWER MAIN BREAKS WHEREAS, $22,400 was budgeted for water main breaks and $15,000 was budgeted for sewer main breaks in 1983; and WHEREAS, at December 31, 1983 there existed a budget balance of $18,148 for water main breaks and there existed a budget balance of $9,456 for sewer main breaks; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Council to establish reserves for water and sewer main breaks; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Council that $18,148 of retained earnings of the Water Fund is hereby designated as a Reserve For Water Main Breaks and that $9,456 of retained earnings of the Sewer Fund is hereby designated as r. a Reserve For Sewer Main Breaks. r Adopted this 28th day of May, 1983. ATTEST: (SEAL) Mayor Clerk -Administrator dik►' I �, RESOLUTION NO. 1740 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION DESIGNATING RETAINED EARNINGS OF THE WATER AND SEWER FUNDS AS RESERVES FOR FUTURE MAINTENANCE AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS WHEREAS, the 1983 Water and Sewer Budgets provided $42,500 and $33,187 respectively for projects contained in the 1983 Water and Sewer system's Maintenance and Capital Improve- ment Program; and WHEREAS, on December 31, 1983 there remained balances of $33,614 and $33,187 available for Water and Sewer Fund Projects respectively; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Council to make those monies available for future maintenance and capital improvement projects; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Council that $33,614 of retained earnings of the Water Fund is hereby `~ designated as a Reserve For Future Maintenance and Capital Improvement Projects and that $33,187 of retained earnings of the Sewer Fund is hereby designated as a Reserve For Future Maintenance and Capital Improvement Projects. Adopted this 28th day of May, 1983. ATTEST: (SEAL) Mayor Clerk -Administrator OM ORDINANCE N0. 358 rCITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF MOUNDS VIEW BY AMENDING CHAPTER 41 ENTITLED, "SPECIFIC REZONINGS" The Council of Mounds View does hereby ordain: 41.14 Pursant to Chapter 40.23, the official Mounds View zoning map is hereby amended to reflect the following rezonings: (See attached copy of property descriptions and stated rezonings, pages 1 through 9) This ordinance shall take effect thirty days after the date of its publication. Read by the City Council of the City of Mounds View on the Read and passed by the City Council of the City of Mounds View this 14th day of May, 1984. ATTEST: Mayor (SEAL) Clerk -Administrator APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney COMPRIiIII;NSIVN REZONINGH 1 ,DDRESS/11HOI'l"RTY I LEOAI. DENCNIPTION MILLER TRIANOLF;_ UNPLATTH-D LANDS, EX H 2O35 FTI.THE E 05 OF W 11111 FT OF NH 1/4 01I1161 11O HWY) IN 6 III21 MILLER 11-2 ZONE, UNPI,A'I"I'ED LANDS, PART OF N 1/2 OF NW 1/4 I,YINO NI•;I,Y OF HWY AND WLY OF FOL UEHC LINE, IIEN ON NI, OF AND 2181,64 FT S OF NW COR OF HD 1/4 'I'll H 1.1DO 2OMN W 1140 FT 'I'll H 121)(i IOMN W 370 FT TH H 4111)(1 E; 620,011 F'I' 'I'H H 21 DO 10MN I,' 61,92 FT TO 11T ON H I, AND 303, 14 FT W OF Hh) COR OF HD N 1/2 OF NW 1/4 AND TIIFIRE TERM (HIIIIJ To RUN AND ESMTS) IN 5 3023 MILLMR/WATHON UNPLATTMD LANDS, PART OF N 1/2 OF NW 11-1 ZONE' 1/4 LYING ELY OF 1'01, DRSC 1,1 BEG ON NI, OF AND 2101,64 FT R OF NW (:01( OF HU 1/4 TH H 13DG 20MN W 1190 FT TH H 12DG IOMN W 370 FT TH S 40 DO E 620,08 FT TH S 21DG 30 MN E 61.92 FT TO PT ON SL OF AND 363.14 FT W OF SE COR OF SD N 1/2 OF NW 1/4 AND THERE TERM (SUBJ TO RUS AND ESMTS) IN 5 3023 MOUNDS VIEW MOBILE ONPLATT81) LANDS, EX NORSEMAN 1S'P MOBILE HOME; PARK ADDITION THE F7 1/2 OF S 64 ACRES OF E 1/2 OF NE 1/4 (SUBJ TO RDS) OF B 3023 COLONIAL VILLAGE UNPLATTED LANDS, PAR'P OF NE 1/4 OF SE WHILE HOME PARK 1/4 LYING WLY OF HWY AND N AND E OF A L AS FOL 11EO ON N L OF AND 150 FT E OF NW COR OF SD 1/4 1/4 TH 9 783 37/100 FT THE E 940 21/100 FT TH ON CURVE TO R WITII RADIUS OF 20 FT FOR 31 21/100 FT TH S 190 21/100 FT THE E 109 9/10 FT TO HWY (SUHJ TO RDS) IN 5 3023 UNPLATTED LANDS, BEG 150 FT E OF W L AND 703 37/100 FT S OF N L OF NE 1/4 OF SH 1/4 THE E 940 21/100 FT TH ON CURVE TO It WITH RADIUS OF 20 FT FOR 31 21/100 FT 111 S 190 21/100 FT THE E 109 9/10 FT TO IIWY TH S TO N L OF 2 193 FT OF SO 1/4 1/4 TH W 1070 24/100 FT MOL TO E L OF W 150 FT OF SO 1/4 1/4 TH N TO BEG (SUBJ TO RDS) IN NE 1/4 OF SE 1/4 OF 5 3023 FPROPOS70 REZONING omr to_) R-1 TO B-3 H-2 To I R-1 TO I B-3 TO R-5 B-3 TO R-5 PAGE 2 OF 9 ADDRESS/PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION PROPOSED REZONING (From_ to ) TOWNSEDGE TERRACE UNPLATTED LANDS, COM AT NW COR NE NE B-3 TOO 1/4, TH S ALONG W LINE OF NE 1/4 440.29 FT TO POINT OF BEG; TH S 80 DEG 35 MIN E 53.81 FT, TH S 58 DEG 39 MIN 42'SEC E TO CL OF RICE CREEK, TH S ANR W ALONG CL OF RICE CREEK TO THE W LINE OF NE 1/4, TH N ON SD W LINE TO BEG, IN SW 1/4 OF NE 1/4 (SUBJ TO ESMTS) IN 17 3023 UNPLATTED LANDS, PART SE OF CREEK CL AND S OF A LINE BEG ON W LINE AND 440.29 FT S OF NW COR TH S 80 DEG 35 MIN E 53.81 FT TH S 58 DEG 39 MIN 42 SEC E 213 FT TH N 82 DEG 10 MIN 4 SEC E 115.26 FT TH N 26 DEG 57 MIN 29 SEC E 79.87 FT TH N 50 DEG 49 MIN 57 SEC E 347.74 FT TH S 76 DEG 24 MIN 32 SEC E 123.5 FT TH S 49 DEG 16 MIN 10 SEC E 103.96 FT TH S 68 DEG 6 MIN 21 SEC E 495.42 FT TH S 43 MIN E 314 FT MOL TH E 697.39 FT TH NE TO HWY IN NE 1/4 17 3023 8270 PLSNT VW DR BRIAR LAKE, LOT 1, BLOCK 1 B-4 TO R/' 8280 PLSNT VW DR BRIAR LAKE, LOT 2, BLOCK 1 B-4 TO R-1 8284 PLSNT VW DR BRIAR LAKE, LOT 1, BLOCK 1 B-4 TO R-1 8265 PLSNT VW DR BRIAR LAKE, LOT 3, BLOCK 2 B-4 TO R-1 8275 PLSNT VW DR BRIAR LAKE, LOT 2, BLOCK 2 B-4 TO R-1 8285 PLSNT VW DR BRIAR LAKE, LOT 1, BLOCK 2 B-4 TO R-1 8240 PLSNT VW DR MOUNDS VIEW DEVELOPMENT CO. #1 B-4 TO R-1 LOT 3, BLOCK 1 8250 PLSNT VW DR MOUNDS VIEW DEVELOPMENT CO. #1 B-4 TO R-1 LOT 2, BLOCK 1 8260 PLSNT VW DR MOUNDS VIEW DEVELOPMENT CO. #1 B-4 TO R-1 LOT 1, BLOCK 1 8235 PLSNT VW DR MOUNDS VIEW DEVELOPMENT CO. #1 B-4 TO R-1 LOT 1, BLOCK 3 8245 PLSNT VW DR MOUNDS VIEW DEVELOPMENT CO. #1 B-4 TO R-1 LOT 2, BLOCK 2 8255 PLSNT VW DR MOUNDS VIEW DEVELOPMENT CO. #1 B-4 TO R- I LOT 1, BLOCK 2 PAGE 3 OF 9 ADDRESS/PROPERTY 28/30 PLSNT VW DI 8225/27 PLSNT VW D1 8126/28 PLSNT VW Cl 8117/19 PLSNT VW Cl 3001/03 HWY 10 8156/58 SP LK RD KNOLLWOOD GREEN 7920 GROVELAND RD 7860 GROVELAND RD 7750 SILVER LK RD 2732 HWY 10 2724 HWY 10 LEGAL DESCRIPTION (MOUNDS VIEW DEVELOPMENT CO LOT 4, BLOCK 1 #1 (MOUNDS VIEW DEVELOPMENT CO. #1 LOT 2, BLOCK 3 (MOUNDS VIEW DEVELOPMENT CO. #1 LOT 5, BLOCK 3 (MOUNDS VIEW DEVELOPMENT CO. #1 LOT 6, BLOCK 3 MOUNDS VIEW DEVELOPMENT CO. #1 LOT 7, BLOCK 3 AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 89, E 166 FT OF PART NELY OF HWY OF LOT 13 AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 89, EX PART NELY OF LINE PARALLEL WITH AND 75 FT SWLY FROM CL OF STH 10/62 THE W 76 FT LOT 51 AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 89, EX PART NELY OF LINE PARALLEL WITH AND 75 FT SWLY FROM CL OF STH 10/62 AND EX W 76 FT; LOT 51 AUDITOR'S SUBDIVSION NO. 89, N 100 FT OF S 185 FT OF LOT 53 AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 89, N 100 OF S 285 FT OF LOT 53 AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISON NO. 89, SUBJ TO ESMTS AND EX N 257.93 FT AS MEASURED ON E AND W LINES; LOT 59 UNPLATTED LANDS, NELY 485 6/10 FT OF NWLY 14o FT OF SELY 1311 9/10 FT MEASURED ON CL OF HWY 10 OF PART OF SE 1/4 SWLY OF SAID CL (SUBJ TO HWY 10) IN 6 3023 UNPLATTED LANDS, NELY 475 FT OF PART OF SE 1/4 LYING SWLY OF CL OF HWY AND BETWEEN 2 LINES RUN SWLY AT RA FROM SO "L AND FROM POINTS THEREON 1065 9/10 FT 9ND 1165 9/10 FT NWLY MEASURED OF SO CL FROM THE S LINE OF SO SE 1/4 (SUBJ TO iWY) IN 6 3023 PROPOSED REZONING (From to ) B-4 TO R-2 B-4 TO R-2 B-4 TO R-2 B-4 TO R-2 B-4 TO R-2 B-4 TO R-2 R-3 TO R-4 R-1 TO R-3 R-1 TO R-2 R-3 TO R-4 B-1 TO B-2 B-1 TO B-2 PAGE. 4 OF 9 ADDRESS/PROPERTY 2716 HIGHWAY 10 2708 HIGHWAY 10 2704 HIGHWAY 10 LARGE TRIANGLE LOT NORTH OF ST. PAUL WATERWORKS EAST OF SILVER LAKE ROAD L-SHAPED LOT NORTH 7831 SUNNYSIDE RD 7841 SUNNYSIDE RD 2657 HWY 10 2665 HWY 10 LEGAL DESCRIPTION UNPLATTED LANDS, SUBJ TO STH 10/62 OVER NELY 75 FT THE NELY 410 6/10 FT OF PART SE 1/4 SWLY OF CL OF SO STH AND BETWEEN 2 LINS RUN SWLY AT RA FROM SO CL AND FROM POINTS MEASURED THEREON ON 965 9/10 FT AND 1u65 9/10 FT FROM S LINE OF SO 1/4 IN 6 3023 UNPLATTED LANDS, SUBJECT TO STH 10/62 OVER NELY 75 FT THE NELY 275 FT OF PART OF SE 1/4 SWLY OF CL OF SO STH AND BETWEEN 2 LINES RUN SWLY AT RA FROM SO CL FROM POINTS MEASURED THEREON 865 9/10 FT AND 965 9/10 FT FROM S L OF SO 1/4 IN 6 3023 UNPLATTED LANDS, NELY 275 FT OF PART OF SE 1/4 LYING SWLY OF CL OF HWY 10 AND BETWEEN 2 PARALLEL LINES RUN SWLY AT RA FROM SO CL AND FROM POINTS MEASURED THEREON 765.9 FT AND 865.9 FT NW FROM S LINE OF SO 1/4 (SUBJ TO HWY) IN 6 3023 UNPLATTED LANDS, SUBJ TO STH 10/62 OVER NELY 75 FT AND EX S 60 FT FOR WW R/W THE SELL 765 9/10 FT MEASURED ON AND AT RA WITH CL OF SO STH OF PAT OF SE 1/4 SWLY OF SD CL IN 6 3023 UNPLATTED LANDS, EX S 60 FT FOR WW R/W AND EX NWLY 100 FT OF NELY 410.6 FT AND EX NELY 275 FT OF PART SELY THEREOF; THE NWLY 300 FT OF SELY 1065.9 FT MEASURED ON AND AT RA WITH CL OF HWY 10 OF PART OF SE 1/4 LYING SWLY OF SO HWY CL (SUBJ TO HWY) IN 6 3023 SPRING LAKE PARK HILLVIEW, SWLY 75 FT OF NELY 150 FT OF LOTS 83 AND 64 SPRING LAKE PARK HILLVIEW, NELY 75 FT OF LOTS 83 AND 84 SPRING LAKE PARK HILLVIEW, SUBJ TO HWY; LOT 80 SPRING LAKE PARK HILLVIEW, SUBJ TO HWY THE FOL: EX NELY 15 FT; LOT 83 AND ALL OF LOTS 81 AND 82 PROPOSED REZONING ( From_ to B-1 TO B-2 B-1 TO B-2 B-1 TO B-2 B-1 TO B-2 B-1 TO B-2 R-3 TO R-1 R-3 TO R-1 R-3 TO R-4 R-3 TO R-4 /�- MOUNDS VIEW SQUARE UNPLATTED LANDS, EX N 33 FT AND 33 FT I B-3 TO B-4� FOR COUNTY ROAD I AND LONG LAKE ROAD AND EX SWLY 150 FT PART OF NE 1/4 NELY OF CL OF STI' 4/62 IN 7 3023 PAGE 5 OF 9 ADDRESS/PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION 1 i21 GREENFIELD AVE NORDLING TERRACE, LOT 14, BLOCK 1 7531 GREENFIELD AVE NORDLING TERRACE, LOT 15, BLOCK 1 7631 GREENFIELD AVE NORDLING TERRACE, LOT 16, BLOCK 1 7641 GREENFIELD AVE NORDLING TERRACE, LOT 17, BLOCK 1 7651 GREENFIELD AVE NURDLING TERRACE, LOT 18, BLOCK 1 7661 GREENFIELD AVE NORDLING TERRACE, LOT 19, BLOCK 1 2288 CO RD I SPRING LAKE PARK HIGHLANDS, EX E 100 FT THE N 97 FT OF LOT 4, BLOCK 4 2275 GROBERG ST SPRING LAKE PARK HIGHLANDS, EX E 100 FT OF THE S 1/2 OF LOT 4, BLOCK 4 2285 GROBERG ST SPRING LAKE PARK HIGHLANDS, E 100 FT OF S 1/2 OF LOT 4, BLOCK 4 2300/2310/2320 UNPLATTED LANDS, N 181 FT OF FOL PART CO RD I W OF JACKSON DRIVE OF E 1/4 OF NE 1/4 OF NW 1/4 (SUBJ TO RD) IN 8 3023 305/2315 UNPLATTED LANDS, S 209 FT OF N 390 FT jROBERG EXT OF FOL PART W OF JACKSON DRIVE E 1/4 OF NE 1/4 OF NW 1/4 OF 8 3023 5445 JACKSON DR UNPLATTED LANDS, EX N 390 FT AND EX S 232.3 FT; PART, W OF JACKSON DRIVE, OF E 1/4 OF NE 1/4 OF NW 1/4 (SUBJ TO RD) IN 8 3023 PROPOSED (From R-3 TO R-3 TO R-3 TO R-3 TO R- R-3 TO R- R-3 TO R- R-3 TO R- R-3 TO R- R-3 TO R- R-3 TO R- R-3 TO R- R-3 TO R- 5401 JACKSON DR UNPLATTED LANDS, S 232.3 FT OF PART, W R-3 TO R- OF JACKSON DRIVE, OF E 1/4 OF NE 1/4 OF NW 1/4 (SUBJ TO RD) IN 8 3023 2501/03 CO RD I GREENFIELD, E 1/2 OF LOT 11, BLOCK 1 R-1 TO R- 2509/11 CO RD I GREENFIELD, W 1/2 OF LOT 11, BLOCK 1 R-1 TO R- SILVER LAKE WOODS LOT 1, BLOCK 1; LOTS 4 AND 5, BLOCK 3; R-1 TO R- LOTS 1 THRU 8, BLOCK 4 LOTS I THRU 11, BLOCK 7; LOTS 1 THRU 10; I TO R- BLOCK 8 LOT 1, BLOCK 9; LOT 1, BLOCK 10; LOT 1, I TO B- BLOCK 11; LOT 1, BLOCK 12 LOT 1, BLOCK 12 I TO R- ED REZONING TO to ) R-4 s PAGE 6 OF 9 ADDRESS/PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION PROPOSED REZONING (From_ to ) TO R-4 SCOTLAND GREEN APARTMENT OWNERSHIP #103, SCOTLAND R-3 TO R- TO R-4 GREEN APARTMENTS TO R-4 2565/81/83 CO RD I BAYPORT ACRES, LOTS 5 AND 6, BLOCK 1 R-1 TO R-2 TO R-4 2508 CO RD I UNPLATTED LANDS, E 119 FT OF W 507 5/10 R-3 TO R-4 FT OF N 321 5/10 FT OF NW 1/4 TO R-4 2500 CO RD I UNPLATTED LANDS, N 153 FT OF E 118 R-3 TO R-4 TO R-4 98/100 FT OF W 626 48/100 FT OF NW 1/4 (SUBJ TO RD) IS 8 3023 TO R-4 7666 WOODLAWN DR UNPLATTED LANDS, S 168 5/10 FT OF N 321 R-3 TO R-4 5/10 FT OF E 118 98/100 FT OF W 626 48/100 FT OF NW 1/4 OF 8 3023 TO R-4 2458/2466 CO RD I UNPLATTED LANDS, E 327 98/100 FT OF W R-3 TO R-4 930 46/100 FT OF N 321 5/10 FT OF NW TO R-4 1/4 OF NW 1/4 (SUBJ TO RD) IN 8 3023 7635/7645/7655 PARK VIEW TERRACE, LOTS 1 THRU 8, BLOCK R-3 TO R-4 WOODLAWN DR 1 TO R-4 7640 EDGEWOOD DR PARK VIEW TERRACE, LOTS 16, 17, AND 18, R-3 TO R-4� BLOCK 2 TO R-4 7636 WOODLAWN DR PARK VIEW TERRACE, LOT 10, BLOCK 2 R-3 TO R-2 7640 WOODLAWN DR PARK VIEW TERRACE, LOT 9, BLOCK 2 R-3 TO R-2 7650 WOODLAWN DR PARK VIEW TERRACE, LOT 6, BLOCK 2 R-3 TO R-2 TO R-4 7622/24 WOODLAWN DR PARK VIEW TERRACE, LOT 14, BLOCK 2 R-3 TO R-2 7626 WOODLAWN DR PARK VIEW TERRACE, LOT 13, BLOCK 2 R-3 TO R-2 TO R-2 7630 WOODLAWN DR PARK VIEW TERRACE, LOT 12, BLOCK 2 R-3 TO R-2 TO R-2 TOM THUMB, GREENFIELD PLAT NO. 2, LOTS 1, 2 AND 3, B-3 TO B-1 TO R-2 2408/10 CO RD I BLOCK 3 2370 CO RD I NORDLING TERRACE, LOT 1, BLOCK 1 R-3 TO R-4 TO R-4 7501 GREENFIELD AVE NORDLING TERRACE, LOT 12, BLOCK 1 R-3 TO R-4 TO B-2 7511 GREENFIELD AVE NORDLING TERRACE, LOT 13, BLOCK 1 R-3 TO R-4 7690/92 SPRING LAKE PARK KNOLLS ADDITION, SUBJ R-1 TO R-2 TO R-4 SILVER LAKE RD TO RD AND ESMTS AND EX W 208.6 FT THE N 30 FT OF LOT 2 AND THE E 1/2 OF LOT 1 7680/82 SPRING LAKE PARK KNOLLS ADDITION, SUBJ R-1 TO R-2 SILVER LAKE RD TO RD AND ES'!TS AND EX W 208.6 FT AND EX NO 30 FT; LOT 2 PAGE 7 OF 9 ADDRESS/PROPERTY ( .JM THUMB, 7305 KNOLLWOOD DR 7-11 STORE, 7295 SILVER LK RD 7180/90 SILVER LK RD 5301/11 EDGEWOOD DI 5284 GREENFIELD AVE 5200 O'CONNELL DR 5210 O'CONNELL DR 5220 O'CONNELL DR 5230 O'CONNELL DR 5240 O'CONNELL DR 1 150 O'CONNELL DR 5260 O'CONNELL DR SPRING LAKE LEGAL DESCRIPTION SPRING LAKE PARK KNOLLS ADDITION, W 125 FT OF LOTS III AND 112 REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 153, SUBJ TO RD AND ESMTS, TRACTS F AND G KNOLLWOOD PARK, N 250 FT OF LOTS 11 AND 12 AND ALL OF LOT 10 CLEAR VIEW ADDITIN, N 100 FT OF LOTS 1 AND 2, BLOCK 1 EIGENHEER 2ND ADDITION, LOT 1, BLOCK 5 EIGENHEER 3RD ADDITION, LOT 7, BLOCK 1 EIGENHEER 3RD ADDITION, LOT 6, BLOCK 1 EIGENHEER 3RD ADDITION, LOT 5, BLOCK 1 EIGENHEER 3RD ADDITION, LOT 4, BLOCK 1 EIGENHEER 3RD ADDITION, LOT 3, BLOCK 1 EIGENHEER 3RD ADDITION, LOT 2, BLOCK 1 EIGENHEER 3RD ADDITION, LOT 1, BLOCK 1 AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 89, SUBJ TO SPRING LAKE PARK RD AND EX W 908 2/10 FT PART IN S 93 FT OF SEC 6 T 30 R 23 OF LOT 24, LYING WEST OF SPRING LAKE PARK RD RIGHT-OF-WAY AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISIN NO. 89, SUBJ TO RD THE N 90 FT OF S 378 FT OF LOT 24, LYING WEST OF SPRING LAKE RD R/W AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 89, SUBJ TO RD AND EX N 25 FT AND EX S 378 FT, LOT 24, LYING WEST OF SPRING LAKE RD R/W AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 89, SUBJ TO RD THE FOL: EX PAT IN S 93 FT LYING E )F W 908.2 FT THE S 288 FT OF LOT 24, LYING WEST OF SPRING LAKE RD R/W PROPOSED REZONING (From_ to_) B-2 TO B-1 B-3 TO B-1 R-3 TO R-4 R-1 TO R-2 R-3 TO R-4 B-3 TO R-1 B-3 TO R-1 B-3 TO R-1 B-3 TO R-1 B-3 TO R-1 B-3 TO R-1 B-3 TO R-1 R-1 TO CRP PAGE 8 OF 9 ADDRESS/PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION SPRING LAKE PARK KNOLLS ADDITION, EX WW PROPOSED REZONING (From_ to R-1 TO CRP SPRING LAKE (CONT.) R/W OVER SLY 15 FT THE PARK SPRING LAKE PARK KNOLLS ADDITION, WW R/W OVER SLY 15 FT OF PARK RICE CREEK LAND UNPLATTED LANDS, EX S 438 65/100 FT AND R-1 TO CRP EX E 516 12/100 FT AND EX BEG ON W L OF E 516 12/100 FT AND N L OF S 438 65/100 FT OF NE 1/4 OF NE 1/4 TH N TO R/W L OF WIDENED HWY 10 TH NWLY THEREON 100 FT TH SWLY TO N L OF SO S 438 65/100 FT AND 100 FT W OF BEG TH TO BEG PART WLY OF HWY OF SD 1/4 1/4 IN 17 3023 UNPLATTED LANDS, PART OF NE 1/4 OF A LINE BEG ON W LINE 440.29 FT S OF NW COR TH S 80 DEG 35 MIN E 53.81 FT TH S 58 DEG 39 MIN 42 SEC E 213 FT TH N 82 DEG 10 MIN 4 SEC E 115.26 FT TH N 26 DEG 57 MIN 29 SEC E 79.87 FT TH N 50 DEG 49 MIN 57 SEC E 347.74 FT TH S 76 DEG 24 MIN 32 SEC E 123.5 FT TH S 49 DEG 16 MIN 10 SEC E 103.96 FT TH S 68 DEG 6 MIN 21 SEC E 495.42 FT TO E LINE OF NE 1/4 (SUBJ TO ESMTS, RDS AND CREEK • CHANNEL CHANGE) IN 17 3023 HIGHWAY PROPERTY, UNPLATTED LANDS, EX N 1029 FT THE W 150 I AND R-1 N 6 S OF NEW HWY 10 FT OF THE NE 1/4 OF THE SE 1/4 (SUBJ TO TO CRP RD) IN 5 3023 GROVELAND PARK AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 89, SUBJ TO R-1 TO PF RDS AND ESMT AND EX N 95.07 FT; LOT 68 ARDAN PARK UNPLATTED LANDS, THE SW 1/4 OF THE NW R-1 TO PF 1/4 LYING SLWY OF HWY (SUBJ TO RD AND ESMTS) IN 5 3023 HILLVIEW PARK SPRING LAKE PARK HILLVIEW, LOTS 7, 8, R-1 TO PF 25 AND "6 OAKWOOD PARK PINEWOOD TERRACE., LOTS 13 THRU 19, R-1 TO PF BLOCK 1 LAMBERT PARK LAMBERT ADDITION, SUBJ TO ESMT THE FOL: R-1 TO PF EX E 25 FT LOT 7 AND ALL OF LOTS 8, 9 AND 10, BLOCK 2 SILVER VIEW PARK REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 360, SUBJ TO R-1 TO PF ESMTS, TRACTS B, C AND E WOODCREST PARK TWELVE OAKS SECOND ADDITION, SUBJ TO R-1 TO PF DRAINAC ESMT, LOT F. ILOCK 9 .PAGE 9 OF 9 ADDRESS/PROPERTY iEENFIELD PARK 1KESIDE PARK RANDOM PARK HILLVIEW RD WELL CITY HALL PROPERTY KNOLLWOOD DR WELL LONG LAKE RD WELL DUSTRIAL PARK TOWER LEGAL DESCRIPTION FBLOCK EWOOU TERRACE NO. 5, SUBJ TO DITCHES T S OF EXTENDED S LN OF LOT 28, 14 OF LOT 35, BLOCK 14 PINEWOOD TERRACE. NO. 5, SUBJ TO DITCHES PART N OF EXTENDED S L OF LOT 28 AND W OF EXTENDED WLY L OF LOT 23 OF LOT 35, BLOCK 14 PINEWOOD TERRACE. NO. 5, SUBJ TO ESMTS; PART IN NW 1/4 OF SE 1/4 OF SEC 5 T 30 R 23 OF LOT 35, BLOCK 14 PINEWOOD TERRACE.' NO. 5, SUBJ TO ESMTS; PART ELY OF EXTENDED WLY LINE OF LOT 23 AND W OF E LINE OF SW 1/4 OF SEC 5 T 30 R 23 OF LOT 35, BLOCK 14 PINEWOOD TERRACE NO. 5, SUBJ TO DITCHES, LOT 27, BLOCK 18 JOHNSON TERRACE, SUBJ TO ESMTS, LOT 12, BLOCK 1 AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 89, SUBJ TO FLOWAGE ESMT AND EX E 85 FT, LOT 20 RANDOM'S FIRST ADDITION, LOTS 5, 6, 7 AND 8, BLOCK 1 UNPLATTED LANDS, E 100 FT OF W 180 FT OF N 183 FT OF NW 1/4 OF SE 1/4 OF SW 1/4 (SUBJ TO RD) IN 5 3023 UNPLATTED LANDS, EX W 254 FT LYING NELY OF HWY AND S OF N 30 FT PART NELY OF CL OF SO HWY OF S 15 ACRES OF NW 1/4 OF NW 1/4 (SUBJ TO HWY AND RD) IN 8 3023 UNPLATTED LANDS, SUBJ TO HWY AND DRIVE PART NELY OF CL OF SO HWY OF SW 1/4 OF NW 1/4 OF 8 3023 SPRING LAKE PARK KNOLLS ADDITION, W 1/2 OF LOT 9 UNPLATTED LANDS, W 153 FT OF S 150 FT OF N 3/4 OF SW 1/4 (SUBJ TO RD) IN 8 3023 UNPLATTED LANDS, N 101.16 FT OF E 164 FT OF SW 1/4 OF NE 1/4 OF 17 3023 PROPOSED REZONING (From_ to_) R-1 TO PF R-1 TO PF R-1 TO PF R-1 TO PF R-1 TO PF R-1 TO PF R-1 TO PF R-1 TO PF R-1 TO PF r. ORDINANCE NO. 360 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE. AMENDING THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF MOUNDS VIEW BY AMENDING CHAPTER 41 ENTITLED, "SPECIFIC RE20NINGS" The Council of the the City of Mounds View does hereby ordain: 41.15 Pursuant to Chapter 40.23, the official Mounds View zoning map is hereby amended to reflect the following rezoning: 7230 and 7250 Silver Lake Road be rezoned from R-3 to R-1, legally known as: Knollwood Park, Lots 8 and 9 ()This ordinance shall take effect thirty days after the date 1 of its publication. Read by the City Council of the City of Mounds View on the the 14th day of May, 1984. Read and passed by the City Council of the City of Mounds View this 14th day of May, 1984. ATTEST: Mayor (SEAL) Clerk -A ministrator APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney rORDINANCE NO. 361 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF MOUNDS VIEW BY AMENDING CHAPTER 41 ENTITLED, "SPECIFIC RE20NINGS" The Council of the the City of Mounds View does hereby ordain: 41.16 Pursuant to Chapter 40.23, the official Mounds View zoning map is hereby amended to reflect the following rezoning: 2740 Highway 10 rezoned be from B-3 to B-2, legally known as: UNPLATTED LANDS, NWLY 200 FT OF SELY 1511 9/10 FT MEASURED ON CL OF HWY 10 OF PART OF SE 1/4 SWLY OF SD CL (SUBJ TO r— HWY) IN 6 3023; f -.. This ordinance shall take effect thirty days after the date of its publication. Read by the City Council of the City of Mounds View on the the 14th day of May, 1984. Read and passed by the City Council of the City of Mounds View this 14th day of May, 1984. ATTEST: Mayor (SEAL) Clerk -Administrator APPROVED AS TO FORM: ...City Attorney ORDINANCE. NO. 362 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF MOUNDS VIEW BY AMENDING CHAPTER 41 ENTITLED, "SPECIFIC REZONINGS" The Council of the the City of Mounds View does hereby ordain: 41.17 Pursuant to Chapter 40.23, the official Mounds View zoning map is hereby amended to reflect the following rezoning: 2270 County Road H be rezoned from R-2 to CRP, legally known as: UNPLATTED LANDS, PART WLY OF HWY AND SELY OF EXTENDED CL OF COUNTY ROAD H OF SE 1/4 (SUBJ TO RDS) IN 8 3023 This ordinance shall take effect thirty days after the date of its publication. Read by the City Council of the City of Mounds View on the the 14th day of May, 1984. Read and passed by the City Council of the City of Mounds View this 14th day of May, 1984. ATTEST: Mayor (SEAL) Clerk —Administrator APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney i r. RESOLUTION NO. 1742 CTTY OF MOUNR9 VIEW COMITY OF RAM9EY STATI: OF WNNESOTA APPROVING JUST AND CORRECT CLAIMS AGAINST CITY FUNDS WMREAS, the City Council of Mounds View, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 412.241, has full authority over the financial affairs of the City and; WHEREAS, '11�n City Council has reviewed the claims numbers: 17234 through 17238 in the amount of $ 638.80 17239 through 17247 in the amount of $ 37,119.94 through 17285 in the amount of $ 3,422.35 13554 through 13656 in the amount of $ 6121203 TOTAL AMOUNT OF CLAIMS PRESENTED $ 102,393.42 and has found said claims to be just and correct; ( list of any exception) NOW THEREFORE, tie it resolved that the City Council of Mounds View hereby approved the attached lists of claims dated by the vote ayes nayes ATTEST: (SEAL) t"ayor Clerk -Administrator 0 r , I ADDITIONAL DIRECT EXPENDITURES CHECK AMOUNT CLAIMANT PURPOSE 17234 $ 21.11 Bruce Anderson Supplies 17235 301.95 City of Fridley Sewer 17236 36.00 Chimrra Theater Gadabouts 17237 259.74 LMCTT- Life Insurance Co. Insurance 17238 20.00 Donald Pauley Supplies $638.80 IN CITY rF Pmnam o, VIEW A f f '! N T S P A Y A 9 L F u F r g# 6 M D I I v T C I. A T N A" T I017239 50.00 PITY Pc MPUNPS VIEW -.....617p4n 1!!,i`Q TTTI r YVcnoA).'rF nATF nr-3C-P4 PACT 0 I P ^ F SUPPLTES,OPFOATTNIC p F F U N n 1 Ctv241._ - 59.^2—_gTnudr .� L_ q E. F-.U1;_C.. - .017242 500.00 U S POSTNASTEP POSTASF 017243 ?r404.hP 5TATF TOFA$ - P F O A PFr'$TfK$ 017244 -- 9F �7 �,_.z.., cTATF TocAeLipFc _ RERSICNS- ----- 17245 32,743.QQ �lPST STATE RANK PF SALARIES, PrSULAP ANp-CVERTTMEr OFfUI" .. ':''; `. 6Nn-cALAPTFc/' FNP+Ft^• T TIME 017245----- u' 7.90 MTNNESOTA MUTUAL LIFE GROUP TNSURANCO '----- 0172?5 ------ 3,422.35 -_ - GPOU VFP ALTN PLAN iI.f. GPV.UP TVSUOARCF 4Op547.79 roECft5Z4Y_E%PEl LSJ-U'ES- Sh'CE--LAST_CO-UXCIL-AEELLG __. ---- ----- -- ------ ;I CITY r.r MrUNnc VTFV A C f O U N T S P A Y I E L F DATE C°-70-84 PAFF 2 r u r C K d A M r UP T r l A T Y A N T o 16 P P P S F I' e 013554 11.62 AT+T INFPPNATTrN SYSTF"S s _ ^1?5°` Us71 ALPTt6rp rl34`F F7,a) A.Lrrurl rrlwTro6'rtrLior ' 011557 75,06 AMFPTCAN NATIONAL BANK 01355P 75,r0 rtnl F ANrFoSFN + ASSrC n13550_----- . 1?T.�L__..._.aAf"N ELFCTP!C " 013560 163,47 PASTIFN PRODUCTS INC 0135F1 rlt.rr orry rVnLt'TTrv! INC • r, _0135t�_--_ 14....49 oR_IEHTnu EXCAVATING. -___ �7T013563 78,E3 rAPTTAL FLFCTPONTCS r 013564 300P0 CHTPPFVP SPolllr,c rrPP ' C^""UNICATIOL�S-T'l TPFCNE °110PLTFSP LITTLITTrF I�6. SUPPLIES4PERAM!' _------__, 6 PAYTHC AGENT FFFS v SUPPLIFS)TPAFFIC r^NTROL _ I'I � .REPAI?Sj SUPPLIES„ VEHICLE �y „ • PPPGPAM TNSTPIICTCRS l; • -.___--__4UPPLI.ES#__8LCCS+"O REPATRSP EOUIPMENT of • „ ---RUPPLTFSrOPFFATING AND-IPTALs FOUTPMENT 013565 512000 COMNUNTTY TFACHFP.S UNLIM PROGRAR TNSTRUCTDR� t if 9t.00 CCMSERV_ _----DT-PFP..--PP.OFESS.ICNAL=SER_1L---_----- 013°f7 F4.^t ^OVIFS WATFP EQUTP"F".'T SUPPLIFSr UTILITIES 1` MWA L779900 DIP PIOPERTY TARATIO" SALAPTFSMMPOAPT TIME �." ANr-PPOC-RAM INSTRUCTORS 03569 953.15 rrPHFP ATHLFTTf. SLIPPLY W'Trrf mf + CLrTHINr REC?EATICN-CC_INC SUPFLIFSPCPFRATT-KG- " 013571 It540*48 HAWKINS CHEMTCAL INC SUPPLTESPOPFOATT14G 3I• Cl?572 4.97 HAY'1FN—PUPPHY SUPPLIESjOPFRATTmr, —._3.0..FQ_--_.ur_ALX_LASMA_TIP1E5_ ___12-T-HER_MCf_ESS1C.".AL SE r.V- 013574 206.50 LEAGUE QF MINN CI'TTFS CONFERENCES s j ----- 1357 --- ..3.1P LTLLTF SURUPP44 NEWS -- LFrAI NOTICE_ - ' ' • unTOPC 6n + __. UELS--+LRP- LCANTS 'i I FOIM3 n r r r n r T S o v r F PtfF 3 CITY OF VIFM P f t DATE 05-35-P4 ' •:. CIrFCw* A° O U r+' T r! 1 1 '" A S T P U n o^. S r. 4I i; _i 011577 5021PS25 PTC.400 MFYERS GENERAL LFGAL SFRVlrFS ANn-PROSTCUTTNC UTY SERVICE-___.-` ! 6 f• ��'• AVO-OTHFP PPrreSSIDt'1!. SERV AND-eDYTF, rWGFS rnvaBLE r , d 013576 21,60 NEW DINAR FORD TNC SUPPLIES, VEHICLE 1 011970 4.0,00 "N DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY COMMUNICATIONS TEL.ECHDNE--- Is �. ; C135en 201,74 4TKf3FSrTA T^Pn T►!C SUPPLIFSrnPERATING ANC-SrJPPLIESr .EQUMEtt_ ' ` 0135P.1 9r323990 CITY OF HOUNDS VIEW OTHER PROFESSIONAL SF.RV • [ r135e2 1061,65 Yrum,: IITFV RPINTING PRTNTING 14 I ,' - C 593_ .------_ 71.5.".!17 ---W-_BElL_TELEP.H04E .CO nF ! r C_._MJ N I _ ! TI ORS-TELPe.!•!Ot1E.—�--1" n e1` 013584 21905 NEW RRTGHTON HDWF. SUPPLTESraPERATING __.:{ AND-SUPPLLMTRAFFIC._CnMTlLDC-__- • . Di AND -SUPPLIES► VEHTCLF 013585--_.)4.0.°4 �V_-BQIGl7O1! HDWF __SUP_PLIES�TIPEPAT_INZ__.-- e AND -SUPPLIES► 8L06F+GRNDS AND -SUPPLIES► UTTLITIES ') AHD-SUP.PLIESr_VEHICLE__._____ 013586 54.69 PrW BPIGHTON HOWF SUMPLIFS90PERATING U la • 013587 18600 NO LFYTNGTON LANDSCAPING SUPPLIESrOPF.RATING 0135. PP_- " - ______5Q,84 __". _PENT _____"__._RENIALi__EOU.TP.MENL__ ALL .YINNESOTA 1 0115eo 6r?47,52 NrPTIJERN STAT« POWFP CO FtFCTPTCTTY :. AND=.NATURAL _GAS.--- .-__— AND-TRAFFTC STC-YALS - ELECT �• . • r _376".43____.___.1tE4N_-STATES_POWEP NRPT __._.,.__ __ _ELECTRICITY_ _._-__ �.r _013590 1"^—STPFFT LIGPTF Aar -NATURAL GAS i u 0 ' 013591 2r548,13 ROPTHERN STATES PnVFP FtFCTPICTTY hb !£ AP!r-STPFFT LIGPTS Is� 01?502 110,55 P40TT OPTN,TTHC DCTtiTTNG — — • 1; 01354„�4.,o��AF_EL.A S QOSF SALARIES., RECULAE 013594 158,94 S + T nFFIr.F PPODUCTS MTSC CFFTCF SUPPLIES ANC-SUPPLIFIIOP-EA TI ' .__._..._.. _... - 5-. 1 �- n;cp ,r .CITY OF HOUNDS 9TEN r. C C O U �' T c P Y A R D OATF Or-30-P4 4 CHECK* A P 0 U N' T C t A I° A N T P l o^ F 012595 92.00 MAPY SAAPTON SUPPITES rDPF.PATl4G �y 01359E 70.-77 J L SPTcLY ft' SL'oPLIFS�CPFPr.Tn,c s I° n13597 147. PE C"jTu LUhPco f_r• SUP^LIES.-DELL G3t!'S _—.-- ----- ° 013598 FOO94958 SPOTNG LK PAQK FTQF DEPT GPANTS + SUPSIOTFS - C135Po 14.n0 cT PAUL PDDK+STATTrNrPY SUPPLjFS9,10cPA"T!Ic n nI n136!?� E54,?5 TEYrAS. IA'4ENT!:3.Y ------ "� 013601 ?1a10 H R TDLI CDMPANY SUPPLTEFpOPFPATTI'G I, _.AND RENTALs_Eet'!PFE14T_----- r,1' 013602 11,47 'J"'TTnf otk%TALS °YSTFM UMTFDPMS + CLCTPTNC- , 9 la: 013603 27.2.3 VTKING C.HFYQOLFT SIIPPLIFSt VF.HICLF 011604 _ _.—..9p606.00 vrTD Qr-APrnt! TAUT,PS C(` ^THFP. PROFFSSTONAL SF.PY �a -MLISNIKC CC F 01?606 25,00 SUF ANDEPSnN ^: =' PROGRAM INSTRUCTORS 011607 196,25 SUSAN' 9F.PNHAGAN PP.nCQAM THSTRUCTORS B.CGGS--_-----_--_-RRIlL3AH_LNS.i2UC7DR5——..a 013609 54.00 JUDY DENHAM PP9GRAM TMSTRUCTDRS 013610 12.50 "APfiA FDRD PROGRAM INSTPUCTDQS _RRMPA-M-IHSIP.11C_Top c 013612 143.75 PAUL JOHNSON v PROGRAM INSTRUCTORS 013611 50.00 JIIDTTH JCNFS PP.DGRAM TNSTPUCTCRS • f136]4 JeA"NF_LAN2---- --------P?CGRAN_LNS-TRUCS_^3S- __-----_4E.4-4_ 0136,15 20.00 KELLY LUNDCUTST PROGRAM INSTRUCTORS olaF14 20P,C`D DFANNA MDPTFNFF!, PPOC.QAM TNSTPUCTCRS C4_---M-A'--L.P-IRES ASSCCIATIT4 P-RLCRA?--lRSTRUUCQ-S 011619 7.50 JEANNF NFI5FN PROGRAM TNSTRUrTlI S 1 CTTY rF vri!KrS VTFW A C C C U H T S P A Y A a L F PATr r-^•r_n� �• CHECK* T L A T M E 1 T o ii n o r c c 013619 11125 9OFTT ^Hn'cTA9 MCPAM INSTrV(7nQS "s. • el 01362P 18475 aPAn nF+ror-,i PPCGPAN IMTTr- 1'r'nPS• ` 0136?1 P11127.- _- °EPSO LA 1'oprnpIr5 °nTkEo.PnnEESSICtLAI-rcoy— .._ . �;°; 013622 23102 PPENTTCF-HALL, INC SUPPLTES,OPFPATING t- u --011623 2?5.00 '!FN LFL! PPrroAM TKSTnIIrT0P5 - -- ° rl'A:c NtTLIPAL CP.EEN I4C 1 r SLPPLIFS,-PLDG.,f,o rc_ ". 013625 50.00 AMcPTCAN HAT L DANK PAYING AGFNT FSFS �e " 013626 4C.CC FA\n•TTr sr1 E Cr • 0� Cf -- 13_2- 7--' ---...__ F/GQ— AMFR PF^ rp!'SS 01362B 3,026108 TRANSPLAN INC OTHFP PPEFESSIO,YAL SERV i ll^ C]'F�9 P9,Ar STrir1+F�! S - - - - SUPFLIF.S,DPFRATTNG - . i!I .._ n r.PNSTFUCTIM-T-rn CD_._-_- 4EPAIP.S,.EO.UI°9ENI---.-- ` 013631 192,00 MV SVTM CLUA SUPPLIFS,OPFRATTNG 91�67� 73a,nn VALIANT TfIC VFNTCLFS — --- A '° 013631 or,OC rT1.nprn SPRLlgte -_ �l, 013614 15.00 Mac PCQGQUTST R E F U N D O1?635 371.r A..cuE PnoTto - pQf+f•RAN INSTPOCTORS -- -- . i7e - 013636 (; 013637 256,00 PPEDF INC SUPPLIFS,OPFRO TTI!G 0 f4 01363A 104,55 wAPY CAOTF.P PAINTS SUPPLIES,CPEPATTN, n 013634 IMOO -- A. +__L ---__._- 013640 8600 BETTY SKELLY P E F U N D 013641 P.0047 fATNFPTNF WFSTLING P p C U k ! —073642 1 P.00 jAcn1iP.- "'� 013643 tr,ar JrHM nINSMORF. REFUNDS 5; CITY OF NOUN^S VTF4 ' ^ ^ ^' T P A Y ,+ P 1 r • rNFrv+ A is M. �I V T r i 5 T"! " T 013644 40.00 TEPPY NFILKAN 6.. r �rbf 'cove PALPF L MTLLEP ° rl {F4h 40,rn VFP"'r"'{T"9ILL ' 013647 40,00 JAMS 4AAS 011R4q- 4n.0e '3ANnrI.PN FPTrKcriH a* --30.0e SAVE F'E�SF"; 0116FO 20.00 KFN KAISFR 013651 to,gn PPrTrrT-ATPr 0 " r 013653 15.on MAav J0 ATFITGNAUSE 0136F4 14,19 rrov F^.IITP"FNT T*'r r rT�Fao 40,rc gnnnSr`. I"STRUCEMT CC 013656 191.42 TFLEOYNF POST , - - 103 61,^1?.?? CHrrae VPTTTFN T.U.TAL nf__11.3_CHECKS.ICTAL --.-101P754.62 n pATF 0°-?n_gt afire 6 P II P P r c I i•Le PFFUNCi PFFVk'nc ---- ° • R EFUF.nS PFFUNOS • - _ ---_�'t PFFI'NOS u . nEPOSTTS - MPA"!T_,_...------- d RFFUNO ---, FOUTPS'F4T P. E F V N ^ ------ 4FF UNO j'� rVOOLTFS9 UTILTTIFS .� SUPPLIESs -UT_ILITIES_-------- n SUPPLTFSP UTILTTIFS I, +� on a ADMINISTRATIVE .� NEWSLETTER May 29, 1984 City of Mounds View VOL. IV, NO. 9 MUNICIPAL LEGISLATIVE COMMISSION On Wednesday, May 23rd the Operating Committee of the Municipal Legislative Commission,of which I am a member met at the Plymouth City Hall and discussed several items. These are as follows: a) Proposals for representation: The Commission received proposals from Larkin Hoffman,Daly & Lindgren Ltd. for representation of the Commission as our lobbyist and from Christopher Miller & Company and Media Services, Inc. for public relations services. These firms are currently under contract with the Commission for these services and their proposals were to continue service for the next eighteen months. A sub -committee made up of five members of the Operating Committee including myself were appointed to review these proposals and submit recommendation to the full Operating Committee for their review and approval prior to submission to the Board of Directors. This sub -committee will be meeting on June 4 to review these proposals in greater detail and discuss the need for the services of all of these firms. b) Appointments to a Regional Transit Board and Metropoiitan Agencies: Tne Committee discussed in great detail the advisability of the Municipal Legislative Commission endorsing particular candidates for appointment to Metropolitan -wide agencies such as the New Regional Transit Board, Metropolitan Council, Metropolitan Waste Control Commission, etc. and it was the concensus of the group that any effort on the part of the Municipal Legislative Commission to endorse particular candidates would have a negative impact upon our ability to maintain good relations with members of all of these agencies and could possibly alienate members of our own organization who are seeking appointment to these agencies. Therefore, the Committee agreed to discuss informally the names of individuals being considered for appointement to such agencies in order that all members can be fully informed of the qualifications of these individuals so that individual members might endorse particular candidates if it is their desire to do so, but the Commission as a whole will take no official position on these matters. ADMINISTRATIVE NEWSLETTER MAY 29, 1984 PAGE TWO is c) Criteria for Admitting New Members: A sub -committee of the Operating Committee was appointed to establish criteria for admitting new members to the Municipal Legislative Commission due to the fact that the Commission is receiving requests for membership from a large number of the cities and it is their desire at this time to limit membership until such time as criteria acceptable to the entire membership is established. It was announced at this meeting that the City of Blaine who was also invited to seek membership with the Commission like the City of Mounds View has applied for membership and will be accepted immediately. d) League of Cities Local Government Aid Proposed Policy: Attached is a copy of a proposed policy from the League of Minnesota Cities on Local Government Aid. This policy has met with significant opposition among the membership of the Commission that are aware of this policy. Staff has reviewed the proposed policy and also agrees with the opposition particularly in the -area of the definition of basic municipal services listed in the first paragraph on page 2 of the policy. A sub -committee of the Operating Committee has been appointed to review this policy and establish a position for the Commission to take at the League of Minnesota Cities Convention in June in Duluth as it will be impossible for the Board of Directors to meet and adopt a position statement prior to that time. I will be reviewing this matter with you at your June 4 Agenda Session in greater detail in order that I might have input into the Commission's Position Statement. ENERGY COUNCIL On the morning of Saturday, May 19th I served as the facilitator for a goal setting session of the Mounds View Energy Council. The session was extremely productive and I feel has provided the Council with a set of goals and programs for them to aim towards over the next year. With the assistance of Rita Docken, our part time Energy Coordinator,the Energy Council should be able to establish an energy conservation program in the City which will be able to provide significant levels of assistance to our residents. We have been advised by the State of Minnesota that the City will be eligible for a Grant up to $15,000 with a ten percent match from the City for continuing funding of our energy conservation program. I have requested Ms. Docken to obtain the necessary information regarding this Grant Program and meet with me to discuss the filing of an application for these monies in conjunction with the City of Blaine. This proposal will be submitted to you for your review and approval as it will be necessary for you to include our ten percent ADMINISTRATIVE NEWSLETTER MAY 29, 1984 PAGE THREE ENERGY COUNCIL (continued) match in the 1985 budget. OFFICE EDUCATION ASSOCIATION BREAKFAST On Thursday, May 17th it was my privilege to attend a breakfast conducted by Irondale High School to honor the employers of their students participating in work study programs. As you know the City of Mounds View had an Office Education Association student working as a part-time receptionist for the City since 1981. This individual, Michelle Bednorz will soon be graduating from Irondale High School and continue to work for the City until she begins Business College on October 1 of this year. During the period of time Michelle has been with us sha has performed her duties ii, an exceptional manner and I am sure we all wish her well in her future career. if you have the opportunity I would encourage you to take the opportunity to congratulate Michelle on her recent graduation. CLEAN-UP DAY The City again conducted a most successful clean-up day on Saturday, May 19. All of the results are not in at this point, however, I can tell you that our revenues exceeded those of 1983 and initial results indicate that we received more material for disposal than in previous years. I would personally like to thank Councilmember Bill Doty for his significant assistance during clean-up day, Bill worked the entire day and were it not for his help we would have been hard-pressed to keep up with the never ending line of vehicles wanting to drop off material. Thanks also go to Jerry Blanchard and Public Works Maintenance Man, Chris Weston. CALENDAR May 28 All Day Memorial Day Holiday May 29 11:00 a.m. City Hall Tours for Irondale Third Grade Classes 1:00 p.m. Metropolitan Airport:, Commission Board Meeting 6:00 p.m. Executive Session with Grant Merritt 7:30 pm. Council Meeting May 30 9:00 a.m. Department Head Meeting ADMINISTRATIVE NEWSLETTER MAY 29, 1984 PAGE FOUR CALENDAR (continued) June 1 9:00 a.m Mike Turner First -Tel K June 4 2:00 p.m. Municipal Legislative Commission Sub -Committee Meeting - Roseville City Hall 7:00 a.m, Agenda Session June 5 9:00 a.m. Department Head Meeting June 6 9:30 a.m. Teamsters Local 320 Arbitra- tion Session - Mounds View City Hall June 7 9:00 a.m. Municipal Legislative Commission Operating Committee Meeting - Rosevil City Hall 11 J 21 Y:64 league of minnesota cities LOCAL GOVERNMENT AID POLICY (Proposed) SYNOPSIS A Local Government Aid formula should be a simple expression of the Legislature's intent. Local government aid (LGA) should be distributed according to 1) the city's revenue raising capacity, as measured by its taxable assessed value; and 2) the city's need, as measured by its population and/or households and its expenditures for basic municipal services. STATEMENT AND RATIONALE Local Government Aid is a major municipal revenue source which complements cities' other major revenue source, the property tax. As such, LGA must be distributed among cities in a way which alleviates the problems inherent in reliance on the property tax as the major revenue source cities control. Cities vary markedly in their ability to raise money from property taxes. There are also wide variations among cities in their citizens' need for services and the costs of providing those services. A complementary revenue source for cities is necessary precisely because a city's ability to raise revenue from the property tax does not necessarily coincide with the cost of the services which that city must provide to its citizens. An LGA formula must reflect both the individual city's need and its local revenue raising capacity. A city's capacity to raise revenues from the property tax is easily measured by the city's equalized assessed value. (For metro -area cities, the assessed value after fiscal disparities distributions is the appropriate figure.) An acceptable aid formula should provide proportionally more aid to cities with less taxable assessed value, other things being equal. Need is more difficult to define and to measure. There is no single data item which measures need equitably; rather, we must rely on a combination of factors to approximate need. Need is clearly related to some extent to the city's number of inhabitants. Cities provide services to people. Because some services relate more closely to households than to individuals, the formula should reflect both the population and the number of households. Every city should receive a basic LGA distribution based on its population and/or number of households. However, neither population nor the number of households completely reflects need. Cities with similar populations and numbers of households may be faced with quite different service needs. (Factors such as age, - OVER - ^sit, aver—e east, st. oaui, minnesota 55101 (61 2) 227-5600 Local Government Aid Policy (Proposed) Page 2 4 construction and density of buildings, crime rates, elderly population, school age population, climate, geographic size, population density, poverty levels, crime rates, seasonal or daily influx of people, need to construct or replace capital facilities, and a myriad of other factors may cause similar sized cities' needs to differ.) Clearly, a formula cannot attempt to incorporate measures of all of these factors; the result would necessarily be complicated and to some extent arbitrary. Rather, the formula should rely on the judgment made by the persons in the best position cc evaluate a city's need: that city's council. The local city council's judgment as to the expenditures required in order to provide the type and level of service needed by its citizens should be reflected in the formula. no formula should reflect all expenditures for basic municipal services. "Basic municipal services" include public safety, streets, sanitation, libraries, redevelopment, and general government and related purposes. This definition is intended as a limit, to assure that a city will not receive additional local government aid as a result of its discretionary spending on nor. -essential services.' So far as possible, the formula should not be affected by the city's choice among tax levies, special assessments, or user fees to finance basic municipal services. To the attempt to measure need by the tax levy, or by past LGA, or by a combination of those factors is not acceptable. The past LGA distribution is the result of several formula changes accompanied by grandfather provisions, minimum increase guarantees, etc. The resulting distribution pattern is at least somewhat arbitrary. And to focus on past aids and levies or levy limits ignores the other revenues which cities' citizens contribute so that the city can meat their service needs. A formula developed in accordance with this policy would likely result in a substantially different distribution of funds. The transition must be handled in an orderly fashion, avoiding drastic year-to-year increases or decreases in aid. Increases and decreases should be phased in, to avoid the need for sudden "shock" property tax increases on one hand, and the tempcation to view increased aid as a windfall on the other. 1This explanatory sentence was added after the task force's last meeting, at l ` the suggestion of a member who was unable to attend that meeting because of illness; the addition of this sentence was approved by an overwhelming majority of the task force and by the LMC Board. 14 league of minnesocc-" �i ,les May 17, 1984 T0: Mayors, Managers, and Clerks FROM: Peter Tritz and Don Slater RE: Report of the LMC Local Government Aid Policy Task Force The Procedure Enclosed is a copy of the proposed policy statement on local government aid which has been approved by the League's local government aid policy task force. The LMC Board of Directors invites all city officials to submit written comments on this proposed statement. The Board will also conduct a hearing on this policy statement at the League's annual conference in Duluth. The Board will then take action to approve, amend, or disapprove the statement following that hearing. If it is approved, the League's Revenue Sources legislative committee will then begin work to develop a formula embodying the policy. Both the policy and the formula would then be presented for adoption as formal League policy at the LMC Legislative Conference next January. The Polic The type of formula contemplated by this policy would differ from the current formula in several ways: First, the policy proposes that population and/or households should be a significant formula element. Second, the policy proposes a floor or minimum distribution which all cities would receive, unlike the current formula under which some cities would eventually receive no aid. And third, the policy proposes to measure "need" by the city's expenditures for a specified list of basic municipal services. By contrast, the current formula's "need" measure is the sum of the city's current LGA plus its levy limit. There was considerable controversy within the task force on the issue of "need," and how any measure of expenditures or revenues should fit into the formula if at all. The task force ultimately concluded that the formula should reflect a city's expenditures for "basic municipal services." Defining which expenditures would count as a "basic municipal service" proved to be very difficult, and involved extensive discussion. The list included in the policy is a compromise between members who preferred a very narrow definition of "basic municipal services, and those who argued for a more inclusive list. -over- 1 E3 university avenue east. st. pau:. ^ ==_ecs =9 ! O'i (c" 2) 227.5600 -2- The Task Force The LGA policy task force consisted of the following elected officials: Sig Stene, Lindstrom, Chairman; Meg Bye, Duluth; Steve Cramer, Minneapolis; June Demos, Roseville; Kelly Ferber, Fergus Falls; Doc Hall, Waseca; Duane Knutson, Fertile; Connie Morrison, Burnsville; Bruce Nawrocki, Columbia Heights; Dean Nyquist, Brooklyn Center; and Al Ringsmuth, Waite Park. Of the task force members, June Demos has declined to support this statement, because it does not include a per capita cap on the amount of expenditures which would be permitted to affect the formula. PT: DS:rmm 4 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW CITY COUNCIL AGENDA SESSION June 4, 1984 7:00 p.m. 1. 7:00 p.m. - Presentation of 1983 Financial Statement by representatives of Voto, Reardon, TautgcaLtd. (Information previously provided.) 2. Consideration of 6 month Performance Review Report on Police Chief Ramacher. 3. Discussion of Legal Service Billings from Grant Merritt (Information previously provided.) 4. Consideration of League of Minnesota Cities Proposed Local Government Aid Policy. 5. Consideration of staff memorandum regarding Application for Appointment to Compensation Task Force. 6. Consideration of staff memorandum regarding Purchase of Play- rground Equipment for Random Park. i 7. Consideration of staff memorandum regarding Purchase of Van from Federal Surplus for $450.00 for Summer J.R.T.A. Program. 8. Consideration of staff memorandum regarding Spraying of City Park Sites. 9. Consideration of staff memoran uim regarding Pinecrest Park Development Proposal. 10. Consideration of Request for Private Septic and Well Service for Property Along Hwy. 10 from T. Holtz. 11. Consideration of Planning Application #153-84 and Current Rezonings Now Being Undertaken. 12. Consideration of 1985 Budget Policy Guidelines and 1985 Budget Calendar 13. Consideration of staff memorandum regarding Metropolitan Airport Commission 1984-85 Capital Improvement Programs Z. MEMO TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: CLERK -ADMINISTRATOR DATE: MAY 17, 1984 SUBJECT: SIX MONTH PERFORMANCE REVIEW - POLICE CHIEF RAMACHER Pursuant to the provisions of Police Chief Ramacher's one-year probationary period I have performed a Performance Review of his first six months of performance as Police Chief based on the Position Description for the position. A copy of the Performance Review and Position Description is attached for your information as well as a copy of the first year goals for the Police Chief position. The following are my observa- tions of Chief Ramacher's progress towards fulfilling the first year goals based on his first six months of performance. 1. As stated in his three month Performance Review Chief Ramacher has been making progress towards making the Department more proactive than reactive and is developing plans for more aggressively publicizing proactive programs such as Neighborhood Watch and Operation ID. Since his three month review the Department has begun the process of developing these programs and par :cipated in a recent Health Fair where these programs were marketed. 2. No significant progress has occurred in this area since his three month review, however, Chief Ramacher has assured me that this goal is a high priority item. 3. Chief Ramacher has assumed a more active role in participating in contract negotiations. 4. No activity in this area as of yet. 5. No activity in this area as of yet. I would like to state, however, that Chief Ramacher was of invaluable assistance during the recent tornado and has taken a more active role in the Civil Defense Program. 6. Chief Ramacher is continually evaluating modification to current departmental operations to improve the quality of law enforcement and do so in an efficient and economic manner. 7. No new developments since the last review. 8. Chief Ramacher is currently investigating the different - systems available to the Department that would fit their needs. MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MAY 17, 1984 PAGE TWO 9. As a result of his attendance at a recent seminar in San Antonio, Texas Chief Ramacher is developing proposals for consideration by the Civil Service Commission to update the Department's operating rules and regulations. As a result of the recent adoption of State Legislation regarding Comparable Worth, any progress towards coordinating the Departments non -union Position Descriptions with those contained in the City's Salary Administration Performance Review Program are a moot point until the mandated studies are performed. 10. Chief Ramacher has as previously stated attended a seminar in San Antonio, Texas as well as attending State Police Chiefs Conventions, however, I would encourage further efforts to refine his skills. It should be pointed out that during the last three months departmental workloads have, for a variety of reasons, been significant and Chief Ramacher has had to assume a very active role in the investigation process which has limited his ability to address these first year goals, however, I would be remiss in not pointing out that the progress he has made in his first i six months has resulted in significant and positive modifications to the Department's operation. RECOMMENDATION; Staff recommends Council approval of this review and the $500.00 per year increase, retroactive to May 14, 1984, previously agreed upon successful completion of the first six months of the probationary period. i /[. PEnrORMARCE REVIEW •' Position Title /J �StQ1 Hame Department �(((Lr/�/— L---- Dale Accountable To (title) K.�/y}.`/I.•��%���r.- SEvaluation of Overall Performance (Ch"k one) a y ly I11 _ It I Jr Unsatisfactory Marginal or fully Esceeds Cunsislanlly P rwgressinq Salisfactory MCqulrements Outstanding A. Ma)or AreeS of Accountability. �(11cins to those specified on the respective Pusition Descriptions) 7.1 9• 10. III 12. —i KEY Unca I is fac t or Manlinal or fully Eaceede Consistently Prugrecs ing Satisfactory Requlremop tl Outstanding ESplan,tory eom•ents are esaenti.,, where perfurnnce Is noted to be marginal. Stanton Auoeidu U. Clhe, Halos to be Considered (tardiness, eblenleeli_le�r contribution to work climate, sic,) 4 � �_ J it .1 • _ w I / _ /_ C. gignilinnl, changes in nerinrny,�r since list review. U. &Irj are where perlurwocc can be improved, Additional education, training or experience which would help the employee in achieving expected performance. 1. Lumrnlsn Uillorenc ee of QL i_,n concerning review. C. Was the Position Ucaeriplion reviewed during the Conference? yes No ❑ Position Description is current Needs re/vision the appraisal covers per .__form months. Ihis form was reviewed by an (Employee Initials)•4i4:]i nIkeet (?Ills) A cl nawlvdgeJ __._ _ (Clerk/Adninislralor Initials Dale e Ini tills du not nocssssrily indics It employee'$ agreement or dissgreemrnl. Maiur Are s gl Att n t6.-t5 (run01ucd) 15. 16. 17. IB 19. 20 Summer[ Cummcute as Itcgmrcd KEY ) unsatisfactory pwq[M[III At. [ONI Qf rvkmiC( II[VIIN lull[ Etcceds Margimal ur ui rartnit Mc Progreeang Salltlaelmry g Cons! Atin IIy Outstanding Stanton Assoc bits. Inc. f 11, �Gf1ud1lki I 1�4=�:'ViL'1:P�.NIItrr AJ'1L' CI'!�1�91 I• L__L—L......I_._._L. -I.. ._. ... ..... _.._ �__ NLY Unsetiafactury P3rginal or rplly Exceeds ronsislmlly Progreso ing Satisfactory Requirements Outstanding FIRST YEAR GOALS - POLICE CHIEF fvk 1. Move the department towards a proactive mode of law enforce- ment as well as reactive. a. Actively organize neighborhood watch areas and publicize the need for and benefits of that program and Operation I.D. b. Meet with church, school, and community groups to develop support for the department and crime prevention programs. 2. Upgrade the in-service training program to provide adequate training and ensure the physical and mental health of the officers. a. Require physical and psychiatric evaluations prior to relicensing and employment. 3. Become more actively involved in the labor relations aspects of the department including participation in contract nego- tiations. 4. Reinstate the City's Safety Committee and actively participate in the preparation of safety programs. 5. Assume the duties of Civil Defense Director and undertake efforts to improve the City's Civil Defense activities including, but no. limited to, upgrading of the City's warning system, development of training programs for staff, and dissemination of material to the public regarding disaster preparedness. 6. Evaluate present scheduling, patrol and enforcement practices, and organizational structure with outlook towards improving the level of service provided to the community at the most reasonable cost possible. 7. Develop and implement measures necessary to improve the security of the department, records and evidence. 8. Develop program for improving the methods for records storage and management including an evaluation of microprocessing and microfilming. 9. In coordination with the Civil Service Commission, update the department's operating rules and regulations, including the coordination of non -union position descriptions with that contained in the City's Salary Administration and Performance Review Program. 10. Obtain advanced training in the areas of management and budgeting. 4 1^ MEMO TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: CLERK -ADMINISTRATOR DATE: MAY 31, 1984 SUBJECT: LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES PROPOSED LOCAL GOVERNMENT AID POLICY Attached; to this memorandum please find a photocopy of a memorandum from Peter Tritz and Don Slater of the League of Minnesota Cities reporting on the activities of the League of Minnesota Cities Local Government Aid Task Policy Task Force and a copy of the proposed Local Government Aid Policy which will be considered by the delegates to the League's convention in the middle of June which Councilmember Doty and I will be attending. As I indicated in my most recent Administrative Newsletter the Municipal Legislative Commission Operating Committee is reviewing the proposed policy in detail and will be recommending a position that, member cities take at the League Convention which will allow for unified lobbying on this policy and hopefully accomplish those changes we feel are necessary. There are two basic concerns that were identified at the initial Operating Committee Meeting on this proposed policy. They are as follows: 1) In the second paragraph under the Statement and Rationale section the policy states, "An acceptable aid formula should provide proportionally more aid to cities with less taxable assessed value, other things being equal." The concern with this section is that the policy does not provide for adjustments as allowed for under current local government aid formula for balancing of assessed values when the values are less than 100 percent of the actual market value of the property as is usually the case in outstate cities. The Committee has already agreed that this section should be clarified to encourage continuation of the current local government aid formula provisions that allow for equilization of differences in assessed valuations among cities. 2) In the first full paragraph on page 2 of the proposed policy an effort is made to define local effort by defining what is meant as basic municipal services which is stated in the policy to include public safety, streets, sanitation, libraries, redevelopment, and general government and related purposes. As has been the long-standing position in the City of Mounds View and many other cities with respect to the Local MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MAY 31, 1984 PAGE TWO 2) continued Government Aid Formula any effort to define basic municipal services should exclude those services not commonly funded among cities in the State of Minnesota with property tax revenues such as sanitation, libraries, and redevelopment. As you can see from the footnote on page 2 there is a certain amount_ of dissension with respect to the afinition of basic municipal services. It would be my recommendation that the City Council continue to maintain the position we have previously taken with respect to what the Local Government Aid Formula should define as local effort namely, only those services that are normally and commonly provided by Minnesota cities using property tax revenues and should exclude such services as sanitation, libraries, redevelopment, etc. Should you agree with my recommendations on this matter or have other thoughts which you would like to have interjected into the Operating r ' Committeeb discussion process, it would be appreciated if you would advise me at this agenda session of your thoughts on this matter. As the final Operating Committee meeting to be held prior to the League of Cities Conference will occur at the time that the Environ- mental Quality Board is meeting it is my intention to contact the Chairman of the Operating Committee prior to June 7 and advise him of our position on this matter and request that he communicate those thoughts to the other members of the Committee. J l league of minnesota cities May 17, 1984 T0: Mayors, Managers, and Clerks FROM: Peter Tritz and Don Slater RE: Report of the LMC Local Government Aid Policy Task Force The Procedure Enclosed is a copy of the proposed policy statement on local government aid which has been approved by the League's local government aid policy task force. The LMC Board of Directors invites all city officials to submit written comments on this proposed statement. The Board will also conduct a hearing on this policy statement at the League's annual conference in Duluth. The Board will then take action to approve, amend, or disapprove the statement following that hearing. If it is approved, the League's Revenue Sources legislative committee will then begin work to develop a formula embodying the policy. Both the policy and the formula would then be presented for adoption as formal League policy at the LMC Legislative Conference next January. The Policy The type of formula contemplated by this policy would differ from the current formula in several ways: First, the policy proposes that population and/or households should be a significant formula element. Second, the policy proposes a floor or minimum distribution which all cities would receive, unlike the current formula under which some cities would eventually receive no aid, And third, the policy proposes to measure "need" by the city's expenditures for a specified list of basic municipal services. By contrast, the current formula's "need" measure is the sum of the city's current LGA plus its levy limit. There was considerable controversy within the task force on the issue of "need," and how any measure of expenditures or revenues should fit into the formula if at all. The task force ultimately concluded that the formula should reflect a city's expenditures for "basic municipal services." Defining which expenditures would count as a "basic municipal service" proved to be very difficult, and involved extensive discussion. The list included in the policy is a compromise between members who preferred a very narrow definition of "basic municipal services, and those who argued for a more inclusive list. -over- 1 E33 university avenue east, st. paul, minnesota 55101 (61 2) 227.5600 Y The Task Force 1 The LCA policy task force consisted of the following elected officials: Sig Stene, Lindstrom, Chairman; Meg Bye, Duluth; Steve Cramer, Minneapolis; June Demos, Roseville; Kelly Ferber, Fergus Falls; Doc Hall, Waseca; Duane Knutson, Fertile; Connie Morrison, Burnsville; Bruce Nawrocki, Columbia Heights; Dean Nyquist, Brooklyn Center; and Al Ringsmuth, Waite Park. of the task force members, June Demos has declined to support this statement, because it does not include a per capita cap on the amount of expenditures which would be permitted to affect the formula. PT:DS:rmm j IIII�� �2Zz 1551 Jill IIIIIII 1-11111 tiozPr s�� league of minnesotai�� LOCAL GOVERNMENT AID POLICY (Proposal Q�6 911 SYNOPSIS A Local Government Aid formula should be a simple expression of the Legislature's intent. Local government aid (LGA) should be distributed according to 1) the city's revenue raising capacity, as measured by its taxable assessed value; and 2) the city's need, as measured by its population and/or households and its expenditures for basic municipal services. STATEMENT AND RATIONALE Local Government Aid is a major municipal revenue source which complements cities' other major revenue source, the property tax. As such, LGA must be distributed among cities in a way which alleviates the problems inherent in reliance on the property tax as the major revenue source cities control.* Cities vary markedly in their ability to raise money from property taxes, There are also wide variations among cities in their citizens' need for services and the costs of providing those services. A complementary revenue source for titles is necessary precisely because a city's ability to raise revenue from the property tax does not necessarily coincide with the cost of the services whie'� that city must provide to its citizens. An LGA formula must reflect both the individual city's need and its local revenue raising capacity. A city's capacity to raise revenues from the property tax is easily measured by the city's equalized assessed value. (For metro -area cities, the assessed value after fiscal disparities distributions is the appropriate figure.) An acceptable aid formula should provide proportionally more aid tQA cities with less taxable assessed value,fother thing&''beicg;;egi Need is more difficult to define and to measure. There is no single data item which measures need equitably; rather, we must rely on a combination of factors to approximate need. Need is clearly related to some extent to the city's number of inhabitants. Cities provide services to people. Because some services relate more closely to households than to individuals, the formula should reflect both the population and the number of households. Every city should receive a basic LGA distribution based on its population and/or number of households. However, neither population nor the number of households completely reflects need. Cities with similar populations and numbers of households may be faced with quite different service needs. (Factors such as age, - OVER - 1 83 university avenue LLISt, St. Paul, minnesota 55101 (61 2) 227.5600 Local Government Aid Policy (Proposed) Page 2 construction and density of buildings, crime rates, elderly population, school age population, climate, geographic size, population density, poverty levels, crime rates, seasonal or daily influx of people, need to construct or replace capital facilities, and a myriad of other factors may cause similar sized cities' needs to differ.) Clearly, a formula cannot attempt to incorporate measures of all of these factors; the result would necessarily be complicated and to some extent arbitrary. , Rather, the formula should rely on the judgment made by the perec"' U p, the best position to evaluate a city's need: that city's councilf. The local city council's judgment as to the expenditures required in order to provide the type and level of service needed by its citizens should be reflected in the formula.'The formula should reflect all expenditures for basic`mih¢fci_ d services# "Basic municipal services" include public safety, strii% hsanitatdon libraries redeye men!; and general government and related purposes. ThiA definition is intended as a limit, to assure that a cj.Lir_wiLl _not receive additional local government _ as a result of its d acretionary lWendina on non -essential sery 0 far as possible, the formula ehoutd not be affected by the city �s choice among tax levies, special assessments, o uaer fees to finance basic municipal services. To the attempt to measure need by the tax levy, or by past LGA, or by a combination of those fac ire is not acceptable. The past LGA distribution is �' the result of several formula changes accompanied by grandfather provisions, ;A"" minimum increase guarantees, etc. The resulting distribution pattern is at least somewhat arbitrary. And to focus on past aids and levies or levy limits ignores the other revenues which cities' citizens contribute so that the city can meet their service needs. A formula developed in accordance with this policy would likely result in a substantially different distribution of funds. The transition must be handled in an orderly fashion, avoiding drastic year-to-year increases or decreases in aid. Increases and decreases should be phased in, to avoid the need for sudden "shock" property tax increases on one hand, and the temptation to view increased aid as a windfall on the other. SThie explanatory sentence was added after the task forte's last meeting, at the suggestion of a member who was unable to attend that meeting because of illness; the addition of this sentence was approved by an overwhelming majority of the task force and by the LNC Board. W MEMO TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM CLERK -ADMINISTRATE DATE: MAY 31, 1984 SUBJECT: APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO COMPENSATION TASK FORCE 733 Attached please fappointmentnd an ltotthe compensationion from Todd lTaskSForce Cabot Drive, for app recently created by the City Council and advertised in the most recent City Newsletter. Mr. wilt's application is the only application received so far by eloterwould ltbeoathis task ppreciatedforce. Your direction inthis mat APPLICATION FOR ADVISORY GROUPS Group Applied For: %/iSlr `yACC eon, Lie „s.fTrc:, Second Choice (if any): Full Name (print or type): r-AA ulI Address: S73-j C.•_bcT /M Years At This Address: Years You Have Lived In Mounds View: S 5— Telephone: Home: 7b•y-5•i31 Work or Other: 64y-3377 QUALIFICATIONS YOU WANT TO HAVE THE COUNCIL CONSIDER Skills and Interests: Employment, Occupation or Other Experience: Memberships, Accomplishments Or Other Qualifications: i I PleaseStateYour Reasons/ For To Serve On Wanting This—Com1mittee: Your response to any of the above may be continued on the back and you may attach any other materials which you want the Council to consider. Signature��/��//� i Date ) Z3 / - I The City of Mounds View is committed to the policy that all persons shall have equal access to its programs, facilities, and employment without regard to race, creed, color, sex, age,' national origin, or handicap. 1 L&s 1 MEMO TO: Mounds View City Council \ FROM: Bruce K. Anderson, Dir c r1811A Parks, Recreation an r y DATE: May 31, 1984 RE: Random Park Playground Equipment The Mounds View Parks and Recreation Commission reviewed six dif- ferent proposals for playground equipment at Random Park at their regularly scheduled May 24, 1984 Park Commission meeting. The six proposals were submitted by local playground manufacturing firms ranging from a low of $6,845.00 from Builders Engineering Company to a high of $10,800.00 from Hamele and Associates. Prior to making their final decision, the Parks and Recreation Commission held a tour on Saturday, May 12; at which time they visited examples of each of the playground firms that submitted proposals. After the sites were visited, staff was directed to develop specifications, (copy attached) based on what the Commis- sion felt would best meet the needs of the Random Park neighbor- hood. The bid proposal from Bob Klein and Associates was selected based on a total bid of $8,107.00, including a 4 deck system, L tube slide, tornado slide, tire swing, cargo net climber, curved climber; chinning bar, and swinging bridge as per the attached diagram. The Commission selected the Miracle Equipment after reviewing the other 5 proposals and first-hand observation of the equipment in the City of Shoreview. The City has budgeted $8,000.00 for the purchase of playground equipment for Random Park in 1984. The additional $107.00 for the playground equip- ment could be covered through the City's regular park fund so that the project could be completed within budget. In addition, I have attached a letter that the Commission has forwarded to 140 residents to receive their input on the equip- ment on Saturday, June 2. In addition to reviewing the equip- ment, the Commission will discuss construction timelines, as well as review the master plan for Random Park. Staff would like to propose at this time that authorization be given to staff to purchase the equipment as outlined from Bob Klein and Associates in the amount of $8,107.00 pending general approval from the Random Park residents. If staff was authorized to purchase the equipment as outlined, an August 1, 1984 deadline would be set for final installation. RECOMMENDATION: Authorize staff to purchase a creative play en- vironment for Random Park from Bob Klein and Associates for the bid price $8tl07.00. BKA/sll U E4�P�.H.1 VMIP'W! &1:il -DOSE �+ { i ( •wn.oa.wewE.E • ' JOB NAM ,-SANDOM PARK, Mounds Viow,' 150OTATIOIe1 DATE THIS BID IS SUBJECT TO OUR 5112184 ACCEPTANCE 92 DAYS AFTER THIS DATE. PLEASE ORDER NOW FOR PROMPT DELIVERY TO I.I.r. Bruce Anderson, Dir PARKS & RECREATION DEPT. 2401 Highway 10 11ounds View, Mn, 55112 - ATTENTION OF YOUR BID NUMBER TERMS 39 check w/order 2% 10 days F.O.B. hounds View, Minn. ::et 30 days ITEM O OUANTITY. U/M MODEL DESCRIPTION 1 1414-550 3',5' declt combo. 1 144-543 5',6'-6" deck combo 1 144-840 "L" tube slide (stainless sliding surface) 1 144-845 Tornado slide (platform hgt of 10'-8" and with enclosure 1 144-852 Swing header with dual end support 1 144-832 Tire swing for above 2 144-825 1144-836 Handholds for vertical climber 1 Small cargo net climber 1 l.t",842 Curved climber 1 144-843 Chinning bar 1 144-855 Swinging bridge of 4"x6" redwood 1 144-830 Wide steps 3 144-816 Enclosures Less discou 1 118-800 8' diameter ® $715.00 1 410 4 way climber ® 505.00 2 900 seri s C spring animals ® $139.00 ea $278.00 NO BID on cirular swim and sand diggers YOU ARE HEREBY AUTHORIZED TO SHIP THE EQUIPMENT LISTED ABOVE FOR WHICH WE AGREE TO PAY THE TOTAL / AMOUNT SPECIFIED TO THE RIGHT. BY _ PURCHASER ,. BY • /19 _ TITLE DATE UNIT 0 PLEASE REFER TO THIS NUMBER ON ALL CC); :SPONDENCE S OUR QUOTATION NUMBER SUB TOTAL hood) $9269. SALES TAX FREIGHT NON-TAXABLE TOTAL 17' MOUNDS VIEWi MINNESOTA BOB KLEN A ASSOCUTES Park i Playground Equlpmeol Y • eew ioovuurUKE a+:.»..eta �a Dual end support header w/tire swan: Chinning bar enclosure 'ertical la:'.,i=r cargo net c11.9ber wide steps IMF enclosure Swinging bridge of 4"xP redwood closure "b Tornado 511:e1 Platfo_- hzt of 1'i sif ad =xtra :eeo bei r N w/safe;., coo'. and �I platfor- Rj� 3 L rertical lalf er 7y�� "L" tube slide F w/stainless slitting. surface NOTE, All decks are 4'x5' and of dimpled non-skid surface BID SPECIFICATIONS FOR CREATIVE PLAY ENVIRONMENT MOUNDS VIEW PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION 2401 HIGHWAY 10 MOUNDS VIEW, MINNESOTA 55112 (612)784-3055 SITE LOCATION: The equipment will be located at Random Park at the intersection of Long Lake Road and Ridge Lane. The site is currently undeveloped and is 1.2 acres in size consisting of four residential lots. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: Includes a creative play environment, trail sys- tem and multi -purpose court. SIZE REQUIREMENTS: Equipment must fit in an area no larger than a 45'x 40 ' area. MINIMUM EQUIPMENT FEATURES: Two slide decks with one being a tornado or whirl slide. The second slide should have some special feature, either a wave slide, roller type slide or tube slide. There should be a minimum of four decks at four different height ranges. There should be at least one tire swing and three different entry points for the equipment. OPTIONS DESIRED: A walking bridge area, slide, cable slide, and/or cargo net. fl Bid Specifications I Creative Play Environment page two ADDITIONAL EQUIPMENT: The Park Commission would also like to have equipment .bid proposals for the following types of equipment: 1. A swing set that would be circular or hexagon in nature where the individuals would swing towards one another and be able to look at one another. 2. A whirl which would be approximately 8' in diameter. i •3. A climber, either geodesic or four-way type of climber. 4. Spring animals. 5. Sand diggers MATERIAL CONSTRUCTION: Equipment will be installed by the City park crew and the Commission will consider equipment in either metal, wood or a combination thereof. The price range should be $6,000 - $10,000 including shipping and delivery charges. SUPPORT MATERIAL: The Park Commission would like a diagram and ) equipment brochure that outlines the specific equipment that is being proposed by your firm. CONTACT ' Bruce Andersonr PERSON: 2401 Highway 10 Mounds View, MN 55112 (612)784-3055 Ext. 141 MEMO TO: Mounds View City FROM: Bruce K. Anderson Parks, Recreation DATE: May 31, 1984 RE: Van Purchase Staff has been reviewing the feasibility of purchasing one addi- tional vehicle to serve our summer JPTA employees. The Federal Surplus Properties Division recently acquired two vans which seat twelve people. They would be ideal for not only transporting equipment, but also "bodies" during the twelve week summer JPTA program. The City currently has no vehicle to move our part-time summer employees on a regular basis; so what we do is drop individuals off at a work site in the morning and pick them up at noon and then we take them back to the site after lunch The ob- vious problems that this causes are lack of tools or equipment, poor supervision and on occasion, employees waiting for rides of ter their project is completed. The cost of the van from the Federal Surplus is $450.00 and one in particular is in relatively good condition. The body is in fair condition and mechanically it appears to be relatively tight as observed by City Mechanic Schmidlin. Staff would like to pro- pose that authorization be given to purchase a van from the Fed- eral Surplus program for $450.00 plus an additional $100.00 for general repair and modification such as equipment boxes, andminor mechanical repair. The monies need to be budgeted from the City's contingency account as there are no dollars allocated for the purchase of a van. Staff feels that in addition to utilizingthe van for our summer JPTA program,( which benefits the City by over $18,000.00 in labor), the vehicle could be used on a year round basis with our recreation programs. Staff will be on hand at Monday evening's meeting to review this proposal and discuss the specifics of how the van could best serve the City. RECOMMENDATION: To authorize staff to purchase a used van from Federal Surplus Properties in the amount of $450.00 plus an addi- tional $100.00 for equipment repair with monies to be budgeted from the City contingency account. BKA/sl l MEMO TO: Mounds View City Council FROM: Bruce K. Anderson, to. Parks, Recreation a d ry DATE: Spraying of City Park Sites We have had a number of requests from residents to initiate some type of week control program within our City parks system; speci- fically to eliminate dandelions. As you are aware, staff has proposed this item in the budget for the last three years, and due to its high expense, it has not been deemed a priority. As a second alternative, we have contacted a private lawn maintenance firm to solicit bids for providing weed control only at four sites; Lakeside Park, Lambert Park, Hillview Park and City Hall Park. Total cost to do all four park sites would be $2,015.10. At this time, staff is not recommending that we expend this amount of dollars for weed control for a one time application, but is rather providing the attached sheets to give you some idea of the costs involved in a crab grass and weed control pro- gram on a small basis. Hopefully this information will be of ( some benefit to you should you receive any calls from residents requesting why we have not done a better job in erradicating dan- delions within the City's park system. Staff will be addressing this issue once again in the 1985 bud- get, but at this time, our recommendation is to develop an entire turf maintenance program including: Fertilization, pre and post- immergent weed control, as well as aeriating, mowing and over - seeding. The costs of such a program are in the $10,000 per year range and at this time, it appears it may be cost prohib.tive. Should you have any questions regarding the attached proposal forms, feel free to contact myself directly at ext.Y41. BKA/sll Attachment INBARNOLDCamni� (QAAIV1iAClA1S�tVKBS SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR f INDIVIDUAL COMMERCIAL PROPERTY YOUR TOTAL CHEMLAWN COMMERCIAL SERVICE PLAN DE{ICNFD BY YOUR CHIMLAWN COMMERCIAL TEAM. • TOGETHER, WE HAVE DILCUnm YOUR PARTICULAR 111E00 AND OIJICYIVIS. ' THE COMMERCIAL TEAM HAS CONDUCTED A THOROUGH SIIRVFY AND ANALYSIS ON YOUR PROPERTY PISTIL � /� •`THIIS PLAN IS DESIGNED TO GIVE YOU THI BEST RESULTS POSSIBLE, AND TO MEET YOUR BUSINESS NEEDS. COMPANY __City of_PI7tIndSVLeW. 5/23/84 CLIENT SALES CONTACT .-yA�tt��,.,,. A{� 1pisen. _ _ PNL�I: 784055 BILLING A00nfss 2A?)i t11_gltWy�U.______bbun3sVlewF _ 55112— CLIENT SERVICE CONTACT---_—_9f7RY' . _�. _ _ _. -.._. __-_- PHONE -_---__. PROPEIRYIIAME _1i bert-Park PAOPCOTYLOCAIONIADDRESSAI,DUOINmAIILSUISCI1NTOtlI .-- CO r-Df.-Lwbert 6_Jackssr�� County 2 ---._tlounSlsVlflNl._Ip1.--551J�_ MIA. NOT APPLICABLE SPECIAL ARIA{ NOTED ON YOUR PROPERTY IPAn11At On N0I SI. nVICEO MARKED FRONT, SIDE BACK LTC, OR A B C ON MAP) ❑ WA 7REE/91nU0 ❑WA KEY PROOLIM AREAS NOTED FOR SERVICE. IIIOII ARIAS RI IOW ANJ MARK ON MAPI A.{•, Illll "•, Ili SIB WEMMEAS I I ILA WEAN PLANT MAIPPML ❑ WA EXCCSS THATCH _—_- l� NIA DRAINAGE PIIOULEM$ ❑'� WA SIUDUORN WEEDS___ _._ ..... ...... .... __ I I NIA PUNTING 111/0111 FM$ D WA UISfCT PROOLEAIS ___-­ L I MIA MINLnAt OE10(liCY I WA MIXED CRASS TYPES _--______-_ I I NM POOR PRUNING_ U NIA DENSE SHADE i.I WA DISEASE PnOBI FMS ❑NIA SEEDLING AREAS (� NIA INSECT PROBLEMS ❑ WA OTHER I ] NIA OTHER ❑ WA FOR BEST RESULTS. OUR RELATIONSHIP IS BASED ON MUTUAL TRUST AND PARTNERSHIP TO ACHIEVE THE BEST POSSIBLE RESULTS FOR YOU. BEST RESULTS ARE ALSO DEPENDENT ON PIIOPLR MAINTENANCE PRACTICES, SUCH AS PROPER MOWING. WATERING AND AERATION. WHICH ME NOT CONTRACTED FOR MTN CHEMLAWN I WILL OE AVAILAULE FOR CONSUL TAIION ON MAINTENANCE SECOMMCNOATIONS. AND MAINTENANCE PAOOLEMS WILL BE REIIOATED TOYOU WHEN THEY ARE IDEHTDIED. AIAu: l'NNlI I,II iRN9 NI!AIID:• WATERING ---___. I I NIA LIMING ❑ WA MOWING -._— I NIA DETHATCHING ❑ WA AERATION I WA OTHER ❑ WA OVERSEEDING ___ I WA OTHER _ [� WA IDFDCRIGt SPI CU IC AREAS On rut n: PROPERTYAND IIMINGI YOUR CHEMLAWN PROGRAM. INESIONED BY THE CHIMLAWN COMMERCIAL TEAM TO MEET YOUR AGRONOMIC AND ROARCULTURAL N91DI ON YOUR PROPERTY. PROfIDAM DESIGN NAME I AWN-_._ LAWN TREEISNRUE APPl4 ANNUAL PROGRAM 10�.�y APPU ANNUAL PROGRAM CURRENT Y£M CA TE)Na (( IfUIL VIAN! CVII CAIRXV IFUIL YEAR) EIFOIFFERENf Prn100 Y ass & w;e2 control 85.60 �iiWRIOO OR PARTIAL) I s _281 76 —. f_—_--___ f L T s - f ------ ° { --- { D 1 -- L------------- f .- s I $_ ._-- A L f — OTHER S _-_ f ._--___._ 7 J f TAX IIf APPI I i _ TAX ITT APPI I S 70tAL ITOTAL I s CLIENT UENI CLIENT CUENT V PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE - (/1. INITIAL INn ML INITIAL INITIAL -_ YOUR INITIALS LOW LOW EACH "CUIRENTYFAn' ANH ANN'IMLPFIGGRAM INDICATES YOUR HNDERSIANDNGOF THE PRO(1MM PLAN SAS DISCUSSEOL MD YOUn COMMITMENT 10 THIS YEAH S(CURRENT)COSTS. AND OUR MUIIMI ORCCIMS Of IIIf-ANNUAL PROGRAM"PIAN CURMENTYEAR"WILL ALSO BE USED IF THE PP.00RAM IS STARTED MID- YEAR, AFTER THE FIRST MPLICAI0H PERIOD ADDITIONAL ADDITIONAL VISITS_ INSPECTIONS _--_ _INSPECTIONS CONSULTATIONS CONSULTATIONS TOTAL PUNNED TOTAL PLANNED VISITS __VISITS -- MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATIONS LISTED BY APPLICAIION PERIOD AND YEAR ItXLUOED IN PROGRAM COSTS BY APPLICATION ABOVE) _ ❑ WA SPECIAL SERVICE DIRECTIONS, CALL AHEAD' I I YES I NOT NECESSARY CLIENT'S MOWING DAVIS) CLIENT'S WATERING DAVIS) PREFERRED DAYISI FOR CHEMLAW14 SERVICE-_---____.-- -- ❑WA 07HER COMMENTS ON.PROPERTY SIRVICI RECEIPTS! OUR SPfGIAI IS[ Wt L ASK FOR A jIGNAWFIE ON fACll PROPERTY IF VOLT DESIRES PLUS ASK FOR COMMENTS THE DATE, THE SPECMLISTS' COMMENTS. AND RECOMMENDATIONS WILL BE NOIED (CHECK ONE 09 MORFI I 1 LEAVE COPY WITH INVOICE I I MINI Nl HIVING A0I)HFSS WITH 114VOICE I I IIOIN I I OTHER BILLING, (CHECK ONE OR MORES (NORMAL TERMS Aft NI 1 30 HAYS AT ILII RL ('.LIPS Of INVOICE) [J LEAVE COPY OI INVOICE MIEN APPIN.ATIOT LOMPIf IL I I IIOTII I-�/7�MAAIILORIGINAI7061IINGA UUHLSSIAUDvfI I OTHER OOM EY /RA..LACCOUNTRINSATIYE ------ ---CLI[NT fIONATVRI ------- CHEMLAWN GUARI TEES! THANK YOUFORSIELICTIND OUNTOP•OUALITY CHEMLAWN COMMERCIAL SERVICES PROGRAM. AND, CONGIMTUu• TIONSI WE WHOMHIAATIOLY /EIS1VI THIS PROGRAM IS ABSOLUTELY Till BABY VALUE YOU CAN BUT FOR YOUR BUSINESS. WPM►ROVIDE YOU THE NSST RESULTS POSSIBLE, AND YOUR SATISFACTION IS GUARANTIED. OUR GUAAANT1119 STMIGNTFORWARD AND SIMPLII We guarantee your satisfaction. We'll keep working until you are sr'I Id, or we'll refund Fhm mt.( konwr Ices! nnnlir_aiinn Rm ARNOLDcawlnm ieu +l►c SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR 1 1 fA JALSGW-" INDIVIDUAL COMMERCIAL PROPERTY YOUR TOTAL CHEMLAWN COMMERCIAL SERVICE PLAN CI SIGNTD IT YOUR CNLYLAWN COMMERCIAL TEAM, TOOITMIR. WE NAY! DISCUSSED YOUR PARTICULAR NIIDS AND OBJECTIVE& TIES COMMERCIAL TEAM HAS CONDUCTED A THOROUON SURVEY AND ANALYSIS ON YOUR PROPIA" HIND{. THIS PLAN 1E DISIONED TO GIVE YOU THE NEST RESULTS ►OESIBA. AND TO MITT YOUR IUSINEi/ MAIDS. COMPANY _ySitX Of k1 &deW7_ _.__. DATE CLIENT SALES CONTACT RnTF`P-1,nilxson— _TOPIC. __784--3055..-><---- BILLINO ADDOLSS _,_, CLIENT SERVICE CONTACT PROPERTY NAME __L PROPERTY LOCATION (ADDRESS AND BOUNDARIES DESCOU'ilONl PHONE SPECIAL AREAS NOTID ON YOUR PAOPIRTY DI OR NOT SERVICED MARKED FRONT. SIOF. OACK. ETC, 014 AG.0 ON MAP( LAWN TRECISHAUB KEY PROBLEM AREAS NOTED FOR SERVICE: POPE AREAS RFIOW AND MARK ON AUDIT 1 A1LK II!(1141BU0 WEAK MIT AS - INIA WEAXPIANI MAIFOIAI -__� ❑WA EXCESS THATCH I NM DRAINAGE PRIMEMS ❑ WA STUBBORN WCECS _______ I WA PLANING PHOULEMS _ IBA INSECT PROBLEMS I I NIA MMERAL DEFICIENCY' nD ❑ WA MIXED GRASS TYPES LI WA POOR PRUNING NIA DENSE SHADE I I NIA DISEASE PROM EMS El WA SEEDLING AREAS _ I J WA INSECT PROBLEMS ❑ WA 0111EA _..... I I NIA OINfR WA FOR BEST RESULTS. OUR RELATIONSHIP IA BASED ON MUTUAL TRUST AND PARTNER{ND To Aemns THA BEST /OESIW RESULTS FOR BEST RESULTS ARE ALSO DEPENDENT ON POOPLII MAINNANCE PRACTICES. SUCH AS PROPER MINING. WAFERING AND AERATION, WHICH ARE NOT CON/IACTED F CHEMLAWN I WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR CONSULTATION UPI P.-NIENANCE RECOMMENDATIONS. A10 MAINTENANCE PROBLEMS WILL BE REPORTED TO YOU WHEN THEY ARE MN AMVIiI lARLV INC0MMINMfI0%S WATERING ____ I J WA LIMING ❑ WA MOWING _ I NIA DEIRATCHING 0 WA AERATION I ___ _ _____— I I NIA OTHFR _ U WA —_ OVERSEEDING I J WA OTHER _ ❑ WA IDESCHIBE SPECIFIC AREAS OR 'ENTIRE PROPERTY" AND TIMING) PROGRAM. DESIGNED BY THI CHIWIAWN COMMERCIAL TEAM TO MEET YOUR AGRONOMIC YGV PROPER". PROGRAMOESIONNAME LAWN __._. TREEISIHRL 1 ,1 LAWN ppmpOM APPLA 1 4 ANNUAL F'ROf••.I,vU� APPLI acres FEAR) 0 �yy CATION -LA l PERI7p abgrassL& eked Control �. 1 PERIOD 1 5 199-46— s--89,60— I 1 ANNUAL PROGRAM (FULL YEARI OR PARTIAL) 3 S S i S A f 3 OTHER 3 TAX (IF APPI 3 TAN BF APPI 3 i TOTAL 5 s $9 60— TOTM S s CLIENT �UENI PLEASE CLIENT PICAS) PI FASC PLEABE PLEASE INITIAL INITIAL INITIAL INITIAL YOVOIKRALS FLOW EACH"CUOIFNI YEAH AND, AWAMINXIGOAL1'INDCAIES YOUR UNRROSIANOING OF THE PROGRAM PLAN (AS DISCUSSEDL AND YOUR TO THIS YEAR'S(CUIIIIENT)COSTS. AN0OUIIMUVIAL UWICIIVISIX OIL' ANNUAL PROGR.LM-PLAN CUIVIENIYEAR" WILL ALSO BE USED IF THE PROGRAM IS YEAR. AFTER THE FIRST APPLICATION Pffi NOD ADDITIONAL ADDTIONAL VISITS VISITS INSPECTIONS INSPECIIONS CONSULTATIONS —____. CONSULTATIONS TOTAL PLANNED TOTAL PLANNED WSITB __ _ -------VISITS MISCELLANEOUS APPLICAI IONS (LISTED BY APPL ILA I WIN FILL LOU AND YE All INGE UDCO IN PROGRAM COSTS BY APPLICATION ABOVE) SPECIAL SERVICE DIRECTIONS, CALL AIHEAU+ I CLIENT'S MOVING DAY(S) PREFERRED 0AY(SI FOR CHEMLAWN SEIWICF ORDII COMMLNIs YES I I NUT NECESSARY WATERING DAYS) 0 W PROPIRTT SERVICE RICIIPT/I OUN 5P1 f. W I!O wIl I ASK fMu SIGNAIIIIIC ON [ACII PxOPFRIV pF YOV OESIAEL PLUS ASK FORCOMAIENTS. THE DATE. THE SPI COMMI NIB. AND Ill COMWNDAIIONS Will IF N0II11 IFIII CX UNI Oil WWII) I I LEAVE COPY WITH INVOICE I I MAII 10 OBI Ix0 AOOII[SS WIIIH INVOICE I I BOTH I I OTHER NILLIN01(CHECK ONE ON MDREI INOAMAL Il RIMS AIII NET W UAYS A IER PICEU T OF INVOICEI U LEAVE COPY OF INVOICE WHEHA;PIICATION COMPLETE I I BOTH I7 RANI ORIGINA(TD BIIIING !AC (AROVfI OIIIEII COY AL CCOVMT RIRRIpMTAT1JY/!�/__--- CHEMLAWN OUARANTE6T7. THAWS YOU FOR SALICTINO OUR TOP41VAO" CNLYLAWN COMMERCIAL SIAYICISPfloE .AND, COME TIONII EYE WHOLANIARTEDLT BEAEVI 16 PROGRAM It ABSOLUTELY THE BEST VALUE YOU CAN NUT FOP YOUR IMNIS& WALL PROVIDI YOU THEW 7 POSSIBLE, AND YOUR SATISFACTION IS GUAMMTSED. OUR GWAANTII IS STRAIGHT170 WAND AND SIMPUI We guarantee your satisfaction, We'll keep workinn until you are satisfied, or " refund InR ARNOLDCOIFYDIK , SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR INDIVIDUAL COMMERCIAL PROPERTY YOUR TOTAL CHEMLAWN COMMERCIAL SERVICE PLAN DESIGNED BY YOUR CHEMLAWN COMMERCIAL TEAM. TOOITHIR. WE MAYS DISGUISED YOUR PARTICULAR MADE AND OBJECTIVES. • THE COMMERCIAL TEAM MAI CONDUCTED A THOROUGH SURVEY AND ANALYSIS ON YOUR PROPERTY NEEDS. • THIS PLAN Ii DISION[D TO GIVE YOU THE BEST RESULTS POSSIBLE, AMC TO MEET YOUR BUSINESS NEEDS. COMPANY —1LV Or m==yj0y.,r_ DATE 5/23/89 CLIENT SALES CONTACT AnIrEE-hnder$On_.____.. __ _I'Nrnl� _ _784-3Q055 BIIMHOADpRESS—2401—Highway.l0 CLIENT SERVICE COUTACT _l i l_�- PROPERTY NAME --aillvlow Park PROPERTY LOCATION TACKINESS AND IILNINRA11.15 DFSCRIPDURI ._.. Long .1zk- R=1 b HMviZd__ — ---- — -----1'bwuisview,-1,h..._55ll2-- WA . NOT APPLICABLE SPECIAL ARIAS NOTED ON YOUR PROPERTY IPARIIAI OO NOT SULWCLB MARKED FRONT SIDE. BACK, LIC. Oil A.00 014 MAP LAWN __ -- -- ❑ WA — IRECISHRUB --_ ❑ NIA XIT PROBLEM ARI11 NOTED FOR IERY10[1 U1011. AOfAS I1[I OW ANp IAAfIA ON AA I A,11. IPIF'.'IM"I WEAKMEAS —_— I I NIA WEAK PLANT MATERIAL �1 LJ NIA EXCESS THATCH,IRA DRAINAGE PIIP0I EMS _— _ 0MIA STUBBORN WEEDS —_ j j RrA PUNTING PROBLEMS LJ WA INSECT PROBLEM/________--_ I !I'A MINERAL DEf CIFNCY —_ ❑ WA MIXED GRASS TYPES I I NM POOR PRUNING ❑ WA DENSE SILAGE -_—_ I i NA DISEASE PROBLEMS _ ❑ WA SEEDLING AREAS _-- (� NM INSECT PROBLEMS ❑ WA OTHER --._ . I NIA OILIER _. ❑ WA -FOR BEST RESULTS. OUR RELATIONSHIP If BASED ON MUTUAL TRUST AND PARTNERSHIP TO ACHIEVE THE BEST ►OISISq RESULTS FDA YOU. BEST RESULTS ARE ALSO DEPENDENT ON PROPER MAINTENANCE PRACTICES SUCH A$ PROPER MOWING. WAIEWNG AND AERATION. WHICH ARE NOT CONTRACTED FOR WITH CHFIAUWN I WILL BE AVAII AIII E FOR CONSUL TAIION ON MAINI E NANCE in COMMF NOATIONS. AND MAINU NANCE PROBLEMS WILL BE REPORT EO TO YOU WHEN THEY ME IDENTIFIED. 414Pl11 % l-a l NI I)VAII NPA M,IN, WATERING I I NM LIM114G _ 0 NIA MOWING _ I IVA OEIHATCII NG L7 WA AERATION — LI NA OTHER ❑ WA OVERSEEOING I I IRA OTHER _ ❑ WA [DESCRIBE SPECIFC AREAS OR 'ENTIRE PROPERTYAND TIMING) YOUR CHEMLAWN PROGRAM. DESIGNED BY YNE CHIMUWN COMMERCIAL TEAM TO MEET YOUR AGRONOMIC AND HORTICULTURAL NIIDSON YOUR PROPERTY. PROGRAM DESIGN NAME LAWN_.___ — TAEE'SNPIIO_ 'J q LAWN YREE4HAUB APPLE .F ij ANNUAL PROGRAM XSCU0��01DC APFNN ANNUAL PROGRAM CURRENT YEAR CA IIONa re (FULL YEAR) con CATION fFULL YEAAI fIFDIFFERENT PER1pOcrabgrass E weed control PERIOD ORPMTMLI 1 1-2Yfl.on s---200.00. B f -- '------------- D 1 -- A 3 -- 1----------- A 1 1 — s I OTHER S 3F 3_ I TAX IN APPI f _ S __— _ _ TAX (IF APPI S i TOTAL S 98-00—__ f -200.00_ TOTAL I E CLIENT Z.1CAL II[NT CLIENT CLIENT PLEASE EASE PLEASE PLEASE IN171AL RIML INITIAL INITIALYOURINILALSO EACH"RP[NI CUY[Ap"AND PROGRAU" INDICAIES YOUR URGE DST ANOR,O OF THE PROGRAM PLAN (AS DISCUSSED). ANO YOUR COMMITMENT TO THIS YEAR 'S/CUARENTI COSTS. AND OUR MUTI)4 OOIECTIVESOF7PE'ANNUAL PROGRAM -PLAN CURRENT YEAR" WILL ALSO BE USED IF THE PROGRAM IS STARTED MID. YEAR, AFTER 111E FIRST APPLICATOR PERIOD A0017IONAL ADDITIONAL VISITS INSPECTIONS CONSULTATIONS TOTAL PUNNED TOTAL PLANNED VISITS VISITS MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATIONS (LISTED BY APPLICATION PERIOD AND YEAR INCLUDED IN PROGRAM COSTS BY APPLICATION ABOVEI ❑ WA SPECIAL SERVICE OIRECTIONSI CALL AIDA01I YES I I NOT NE Cf SSAIIY CLIME MOWING DAVISI _ .. .-. PREFERRED DAVIS) FOR CHEMLAWN 51 RVK:1 OTHER COMMENTS CLIENT'S WATFIUNO DAVIS) _. WA ON�PROIIHTY tIRYICI RLCIIPTE, (JUN til•11'uuli I ylltl ASA I UI1 A tiI,iNAllDlf UH f ACN I'NM'LIIIY 11! YUU OESIREI. PLUS ASK FOR COMMENTS THE DATE, THE SPECULISTS' COMMENTS, AIIO RE COMM[ NBA 110115 Wit I In 1101 i LI ILIA LK (INI INS M(IIII I 1 J LEAVE COPY WITH INVOICE I 1 MAIL TO Ulll ING ADIIRF55 WITH INVOICE I I ROD, I I OTHER BILLIN01 (CHECK ONE OR MONCI TNODMAL II IILIII AIN N[ 1 VI IIAVS Ar Tln nFCEK•T OF I,IVDILFI I J LEAVE COPY OF DIVORCE WIZEN APPIN ARON COMPLETE ! II0111 I1 MAIL OJ Gil To LONG (I !iSIAHUVLI BRIER _ CO CI ACCOUNT RIIR fIMTATIY CUINT fIONATMR[ CHEML WN GUARANT SI THANK YOU FOR 19LICTINO OUR TOLOUAUTY CHEMLAWN COMMERCIALSERVICES PROGRAM. AND. CONGRATUu. TIONSIWf WHOUNHIART[OLYSIUIY THIS PROD RAM It AS SOLUTELV THE I III VALUE YOU CAN I MT FOR YOUR BUSINESS. WKU PROVIDE YOU THE LEST RESULTS POISP LI, AND YOUR SATO/ACTION If GUARANTf90. OUR OMLMNYII IS STAAIGNTFORWARD AND SIMILE, We guarantee your satisfaction. We'll ker working until you are �rt' ed, or we'll refund the oo,,tf of VCIIIr Inct nF�I�IInrA+I.... tfo ARNOLDcammG.Xn (fill yy O k__ 11l0**" M3VKJ5 INDIVIDUALL COMMERCIAL PROPERTY YOUR TOTAL CHEMLAWN COMMERCIAL SERVICE PLAN DIMONEO BY YOUR CMIMLAWNCOMMARCIAL TEAM. TOGITHIR, 11t HAVE OIICUNED YOUR PARTICULAR NEEDS AND ONICTIVO. THE COMMERCIAL TEAM HAS CONDUCTED A THOROUGH SURVEY AND ANALYSIS ON YOUR PROPERTY NEEDS. THIS PLAN II DISIONSO TO GIVE YOU THE SIST RESULTS POSSIBLE, AND TO MEET YOUR BUSINESS NEEDS. COMPANY —Lity—O lhmdui4 _._.._-----DATE 5 23 A4 CLIENT SALES CONTACT_ RVnyp �. _-________PHONE _7a4-}'ElPfy, Oft LING ADORE SS_ 2401�I19rmy_IQ.-.—.-------.-----_/'�µFuSV1CY/T �•i�l. 7J1 CUE NY SERVICE CONIACI__, SM13 FIRM[ _ PROPFRTYNAMF _ hbundvim City hall PROPERTY LOCARON (ADDRESS AND DGBNflA KFs nw nnVTInIN .2401 24AA,���,,,ql,,i,i�cg way11NH1.0 } �5' ___ __... .. _...._. _ __-Mound�Yim. N'Y1• ..�JIZLNIA.NOT APPLICABLE SPECIAL AREAS NOTED ON YOUR PROPERTY IPAnI IAA 1 +01 SEOY'Cf0 MAnXFO FRONT, SIDE. BACK, E IC OR ACC ON MAP I LAWN __ __ ______ ❑ WA mcclsNnun RAY PROS LIM AREAS NOTED FOR SLRVICI: I1001( ATILAS Bit OW ANII MAnX ON MAP) ❑ WA 1 AIAN INIIaurVtl WEAR AREAS — __�___�_ I I N,A WEAK PLANT MAIFRIAL 1l D Na EXCESS THATCH I ] WA DRAINAGE PROBLEMS El MA STUBBORN WEEDS I I NIA PUNTING PRIME MS NIA INSECT PROBLEMS U NIA MINERAL DEFICIENCY _ �U 0 NIA MIXED GRASS TYPES _._ _ I I WA POOR PRUNING ____ 0 WA DENSE SNARE I i NIA DISEASE PROBLEMS ❑ WA SEEDLING AREAS_ __ __ I I NM INSECT PROBI I MS ❑ MIA OTHER I] WA OTHER ❑ WA FOR BEST RESULTS. OUR RELATIONSHIP IS BASED ON MUTUAL TRUST AND PARTNERSHIP TO ACH19VI THE BEST POSSIBLE RESULTS FOR YOU. BEST RESULTS ARE ALSO DEPENDENT ON PROPEn MAINTENANCE PRACI ICES. SUCH AS PROPER MOWNG, WATERING AND AERATION. WHICH ARE NOT CONTRACTED FOR WITH CHEMLAWN I WILL BE AVAR AOL E FOR CONSUL MICH ON MAUITE NANCE RFCCMMENOA TANS. AND MAINTENANCE PROBLEMS WILL BE REPORTED TO YOU WHEN THEY ARE IDENTIFIED. AMPi111G141 PILIARNNUA11,IN., WATERING _ _ I I NIA IIMING _ .... -_ (- I ] NIA MOWING I] NIA DETHATCHING U NIA AERATOR _ ( ] NIA OTHER ❑ WA OVERSEEDINO I.1 WA OTHER ❑ WA InFSCn+nf SPf L+fW.. AnEA50n "fNTnF MVIPF07YAND IIWNG) _ YOUR CHEMLAWN PROGRAM. DESIONIO BY THE CHEMLAWN COMMERCIAL TEAM TO MEET YOUR AGRONOMIC AND NORTICULTURALNIRDE YOUR PROPERTY. ON PROGRAM DESIGN NAME LAWN tRFEISORUD— LAWN TREIISNRUE APPLP 13.75ANNUAL PROGRAM l APPLt ANNUAL PROGRAM CArim i (FULL YEAR (FULL YEAR) CCC CURRENT YEAR OF DIFFERENT PERM Cra grass control PERM yl ORPARFML) A�6f1wpleed coo 1 { �A..�AA..1�MG—� f _S80-nY-� I $ L T f f t 3 f A f f 3 f f { I f 1 6 f f OTHER 1 TAX (IF APPI f f TAX (IF APP) f 3 to TOTAL 7 _1.305.68.._.. 3 _.-- 880.00_ IOIM CLIENT uENt CLIENT PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE INITIAL IIIIIML CLIENT PLEASE INITIAL INITIAL YOUR INITIALS 0 EACH "CURRENT YEAR ANNNUAL PROGRAM' INDICATES YOUR UNDERSTANDIIIG OF PROGRAM PLAN(AS OISCUSSEDI, AND YOUR COMMITMENT TO THIS YEAR'S( URRENTI COSTS, AND OUn MUIUAI' OBJECTIVES OF THE ANNIAI PROOUTA"PLAN "CURRENT YEAR" WILL ALSO BE USED IF THE PAODRAM 15 STARTED MID YEAR. AFTER THE FIRST APPLICAION PERIOD ADDITIONAL ADD1710NAL Visits _..__VISITS _. INSPECTIONS INSPECTIONS CONSULTATIONS _.___ ___CONSULTA71ON5 TOTAL PLANNED TOTAL PLANNFO VISITS VISITS MISCELLANEOUS MPLICA71ONS ILISTED DY APPLICATH)N PF.IHOD AND YEAR IACLUVED IN PROGRAM COSTS BY APPLICATION ABOVE SPECIAL SERVICE DIRECTIONS, CALL AIIIA01 I I YES CLIENT'S MOWING DAYISI PREFERRED DAYISI FOR CHEMLAWN SERVICE OIMERCOMMENIS NOT UF.CF.SSAnY CLIENT'S WATERING DAYISI WA WA ON.PROPEAITY IIRVICI NCCEI■TSIOM SPECIALIST WILL ASK f OR A SIGIMIURE ON EACII PnOPE„TY [If YOU DESIRE). PLUS ASK FOR COMMENTS THE DATE, THE SPECIALISTS' COMMENTS. AND RECOMMENDATIONS "It DE UOI f 0 ICIRCK ONE On MOnLI 11 LEAVE COPY WI711 INVOICE I I MAII TO DII LING ADDRESS Will INVOICE I I 00111 I OTHEn IILLINOI ICIIECK OIF 0n MOnt) DIDnMAL If RMN Ant 'If I D BAYS Af If R „ICE IPA OF InVOICEI LJ LEAVE COPYOF INVOICE WHEN APPLICAIION COMPLETE BOTH L1 "I OnIGI IUDILING IIWRRAlRldl --I i 0111EI1 I� Y�� COYY CI l CCOUNT ORIfENTATY EMT /IONITIIRI CNEMLAWNGUARANyLC StTHANK YOU FOR SELECTING OUR TOP.QUALITY CHIMLAWN COMMERCIAL 11AVICES PROGRAM. AND, CONORATULA. TIONSIWIWHOLENIARTIOIYIIUL(V THIS PROGRAM Y ABSOLUTELY THE 8157 VALUE YOU CAN BUY FOR YOUR BUSINIST. LING'" PROVIDE YOU THE BEST RESULTS POIIIILS, AND YOUR BATIIFACTICN 13 GUARANTIED. OUR GUARANTEE IS ITRAIOHTFORWAND AND IIMPLII We guarantee your satisfaction, We'll keep working until you are satisfied, or we'll refund {hd F,ne# Y.F ,.nI,K 1..4 i MEMO TO: Clerk -Administrator & City Council FROM: Director of Public Works/Community Development DATE: May 23, 1984 SUBJECT: Pine Crest Park Development Proposal Attached please find a copy of the Minnesota Department of Trans - portion's May 8, 1984 letter on the subject project approving a full median cross over under certain conditions. I wish to clarify staff's position on who should be responsible for complying with these conditions. Condition 1. All road work cost should be paid for by the developer. Condition 2. All of the cost should be paid by the developer. Condition 3. The City should commit itself to completing a system of local streets which can provide all access aided by the parcel being developed. Also, the City should agree to not permit any additional access to Trunk Highway 10 between County Road H and County Road H2. Condition 4. The developer should be reponsible for placing ' the Wooddale int rsection halfway between County Road H and County Road H2 intersections to provide for better traffic flow should a signal be needed. If you agree with the staff position on this matter, we would ask your authorization to advise Mr. Buyum, Mr. Waste & N . "rLst of the requirements, which would become part of any development agreements, and indicate to Mr. Buyum that unless Mr. Waste & Herbst begin the development process within the period of time needed to finalize Mr. Buyum's D.A. that all developer costs will be paid by Mr. Buyum. One question you might have is who will pay the annual operation and maintenance cost? In a conversation with Mr. Kermit K. McRae of the Minnesota Department of Transportation, he indicated that the City pays power and routine maintenance costs. Routine maintenance basically means that we paint the signal poles in 5 to 7 years. As with other signal systems, the state will have an agreement with the City stating that the state will keep the signals in operating condition. SWT/mb 00NESOT9 OF TP04 Minnesota Department of "Transportation District 9 3485 Hadley l\\Vnue North. Box 2050 North SI. Paul, Minnesota 55109 May 8, 1984 Honorable Duane W. McCarty Mayor, City of Mounds View I ✓X1rflfJv 2401 Highway 10 Mounds View, Minnesota 55112 Dear Mayor McCarty: SUBJECT: S.P. 6204 (TH 10) In Mounds View Telephone 779-1178 Thank you for your March 14, 1984 letter transmitting the City Council Resolution requesting that Mn/DOT consider approval of a full median crossover between County Road H and County Road H-2. We have evaluated the three access alternatives and the resulting traffic patterns proposed by the Pinecrest Properties. We recognize that development will occur regardless of what type of access is provided, and that the local street system, as well as the trunk highway, will be affected. The first alternative, a full median crossover, will generate a large number of southbound t, eastbound left turns at the new crossover. Traffic is expected to ncrease on County Road H on both sides of T.H. 10. The increase in traffic on County Road H-2 will be less severe than on County Road H. The second alternative, a partial crossover, will require those vehicles desiring to cross T.H. 10 at the new street, to go to County Road H or County Road H-2 and make a left turn. Traffic on County Road H-2 will increase much more than under Alternative 1. The third alternative, no median opening, will increase traffic significantly on both County Road H and County Road H-2. Our analysis showed that the Level of Service at County Road H and County Road H-2 will be F (worst rating) under all three alternatives. While inone of the alternatives provides any significant improvement in intersection capacity, Alternative 1 has the least impact on the transportation system as a whole. An h'qunWhy tmplgrrr Hon. Duane W. McCarty May 8, 1984 Page Two Based upon our review of the access alternatives and the City's desire to encourage development in this area, we would agree to allowing a N11 median crossover for the new Wooddale intersection under these conditions: (1) All roadwork costs will be paid by the City/developer (e.g. turn lanes, median crossover, Wooddale approaches to T.H. 10). (2) If it is determined that sufficient traffic volumes will exist in the short term after the intersection is opened such that a traffic signal is necessary, all signal costs will be paid by the City/developer. (3) The City commit itself to completing a system of local streets which can provide all access needed to the parcels being developed. The City agrees to not permit any additional access to T.H. 10 between County Road H and County Road H-2. (4) The Wooddale intersection is to be placed half -way between County Road H and County Road H-2 to provide for better traffic flow should a signal be needed. Mn/DOT would issue a permit to allow the road construction on our right of way. We would appreciate the opportunity to review any local street system concept plans and/or detailed construction plans whenever they become available. We would also like to discuss the timetable for development with the City so we can better be able to judge when a traffic signal may be needed. We hope our analysis and conditions for providing full access for a new Wooddale intersection are consistent with the City's desires for encouraging development and providing for traffic safety. We appreciate the opportunity to work with the City and developers in this matter. Sincerely, Kermit K. McRae, P.E. District Engineer L- iv MEMO TO: Clerk -Administrator City Council Director of Public Works/Community Development FROM: Building Inspector DATE: May 31, 1984 SUBJECT: PRIVATE SEWER AND WATER SERVICE REQUEST Attached is a letter from Mr. T. Holtz in which he is making the request to provide his own sewer and water service for property located at 2935 Highway 10 (his address is not correct in the letter). Further, he wishes to use a trailer as a temporary building to live in while building his house and also construct a garage before a principle dwelling is built. The property does not have City sewer and water servcie available to the lot. Question #1 - The sewer ordinance clearly states that all new buildings constructed shall hook up to the municipal sewer system. Question #2 - The water ordinance does not prohibit him from providing his own service. Question #3 - The Zoning Code allows temporary mobile home permits for 90 days for office useage (not home) with City Council approval. Question #4 - The Zoning Code has previously been determined to read that an accessory structure cannot be built or located on a lot until a principle building exists on that said property. Conclusion - Mr. T. Holtz requests,'with the exception of #2 concerning the well, all require a deviation of City ordinances. Please direct staff as to your direction in this matter. Thank you. SAR/bc 1 c o Cvc io-. a 0 d4C ' C.Cr-.J -w 1 F 5 9 'N-,Ll-y /0-1. i p� {00 C. CO-Ld- —uh ..0....d,Q. ECG. • _ -�a�t12 µrJJ{J..- ��u', 0_a.d.en,�u,���(-a .,�Ct✓t.c�t.-cr1'L-�----= 1 . ♦ ? Lljiu . _..._.._.. _ -v Il-�-1 ♦ tilt ti t+�y'. J. L✓ JT ' Z- 'JIL,' - .__._.-_ _._il•el71"I+JPlCL1J.�., ..�7�M�•'C.-�It.A Ai/ -�- ?Ci 4) f, ore d..4.1. ?•YT , �� Tom .. .. ... .. . .... •.. . '. IP;.(� YJ�'# ,.. .,..... V MEMO TO: City Council Clerk -Administrator Director of Public Works/Community Development FROM: Building Inspector DATE: May 31, 1984 SUBJECT: PLANNING CASE 153-84 AND CURRENT REZONING NOW BEING UNDERTAKEN Today Holiday Station Stores, Inc. made application for a condi- tional use permit for gasoline sales and development review for property located at 2B00, 2806, 2808 Highway 10. The properties are currently zoned B-31 Highway Commercial but public hearings have been scheduled for June 11 and July 9 to rezone. the property from B-3, Highway Commercial to R-3, Medium Density Residential. In light of this application, does the Council wish to proceed with the rezoning of these properties or do you wish to table the rezoning to consider this request? 4 Please direct staff as to your direction in this matter. SAR/bc P.S. The site and floor plans are available in the library if you wish to review them. dtLV"-- 1 3. MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council ' FROM: Finance Director -Treasurer Brager DATE: May 31, 1984 i SUBJECT: 1985 BUDGET POLICY GUIDELINES To assist staff in preparing the 1985 Budget your consideration and direction on several policy issues would be appreciated. This approach was followed during last year's budget preparation process and was a great aid in preparing the first drafts of the 1984 budget. As in the past these guidelines are subject to modification at any time during the budget process. Energy costs are a major item in our budget. Staff talked with our suppliers about future costs and reviewed estimates of future energy prices developed by the State Energy Agency. Based upon information from those sources staff feels that an 8% increase in electricity and a 68 increase in natural gas rates is probable for 1985. Present prices paid for motor fuels are: regular gasoline @ $1.079; unleaded gasoline $1.109; and $ .82 LPG. The Minnesota Energy Agency projects these costs during 1985 to be: regular gasoline $1.35; unleaded gasoline $1.40; and $ .85 LPG. Staff recommends these figures be used for budget purposes. The Implicit Price Deflator is an index of the costs of goods and services that governments actually purchase. It is used by the Minnesota Department of Revenue in the calculation of the levy limits of Minnesota Cities. At ,the present time it is estimated that it will be 5.7% on June 30, 1984; that figure is used in the levy limit calculation. In addition any increase in the number of households and/or population is used in adjusting the levy limits. That data is provided by the Metropolitan Council and will not be available until mid July. Staff feels that the Implicit Price Deflator and population increase should be a goal as far as an increase in the property tax levy is concerned. Therefore, staff suggests a goal of attempting to limit the overall property tax increase to 5%. Preliminary General Fund revenue estimates, using a 59 property tax increase as a guideline, result in 1985 revenues being 3.21% more than 1984 revenues. The reason overall revenues are not 58 is that our 1985 local government aids are "frozen" at the 1984 level. Had local government aid increased by 5% our overall general fund revenues would have been approximately 5%. Staff recommends first draft budgets be prepared using as a guideline a 5% increase in the property tax levy. Page 2 May 31, 1984 Staff recommends union salaries be budgeted at 5% over 1984 salaries and that non -union salaries be budgeted at 7% over 1984 salaries. These are the same amounts that were budgeted last year. Staff believes these amounts should be budgeted to continue the program of achieving internal equity in non -union salaries which was begun last year and in order to comply with recently enacted comparable worth legislation. Recent (and anticipated) union settlements provide for a $10.00 increase in the City's contribution for insurance benefits. Using those settlements as a benchmark staff recommends a $10.00 increase in the City's contribution to non -union employees health benefits be budgeted for 1485. A contingency is necessary for unforseen circumstances and emergencies. Unforseen circumstances could include: energy price increases greater than anticipated because of increased conflict in the Persian Gulf, costs associated with employee turnover, implementation of comparable worth legislation, to name a few. Emergencies could include failure and subsequent repair of the heating and air conditioning system, breakdown of vehicles and/or equipment, or another record snowfall to name a few. For the above reasons staff recommends an operating contingency of $25,000 be budgeted. Attached is a proposed budget calendar for your consideration. RECOMMENDATION: For purposes of_preparation of the Council by motion adopt the recommended 1985 budget contained in this memo and adopt by resolution the 1985 budget calendar. 117LE 1985 budget, guidelines recommended i I RESOLUTION NO. CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA (DRAFT; RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE 1985 BUDGET CALENDAR WHEREAS, the City Charter prescribes the requirements for a Budget Calendar under 7.04; and WHEREAS, the City Staff has reviewed the requirements of that section - 7.04 and determined the following: 21 June 1984 - Staffing Recommendations to Clerk - Administrator 2 July 1984 - Staff submit recommendations for staffing for 1984 to Council Week of June 25, 1984 - Department Heads first round departmental budget meetings with Administrator and Finance Director 9 July 1984 - Staff submit review of adequacy of license and permit fees and recommendations to Council for review 9 July 1984 - Revenue Estimates submitted to Council 9 July 1984 - Staff submits first draft of departmental budgets to Council Week of July 16, 1984 - Department Heads second round departmental budget meetings with Administrator and Finance Director 6 August 1984 - Staff submit revenue sharing recommendations to Council 6 August 1984 - Staff submits and reviews with Council second draft of departmental budgets 20 August 1984 - Staff submit utility budget and rate recommendations to Council 20 August 1984 - Staff submit Preliminary Budgets to Council for review RESOLUTION NO. Page Two 30 August 1984 - Proposed Budget submitted to Council 4 September 1984 - Council Agenda Session 10 September 1984 - Revenue Sharing Budget Hearing, 7:40 p.m. No later than - Council finalize budget and adopt 8 October 1984 resolutions authorizing budget and tax levy Hearing on Budget NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mounds View adopts the above calendar for the 1984 Budget process. Adopted this 9 day of May, 1984. ATTEST: (SEAL) Mayor Clerk -Administrator jt4ti%- l'y MEMO TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM. CLERK-ADMINISTRATO DATE: MAY 23, 1984 \ SUBJECT: METROPOLITAN AIRPORT COMMISSION 1984-85 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS Attached please find correspondence received from the Metropolitan Council regarding their review and comments on the Metropolitan Airport Commissions 1984-1985 Capital Improvement Programs. As you may recall the City has previously received this information and determined not to comment on it due to the fact that it is contained within the Master Plan and any efforts to discourage such improvements through the Metropolitan Council would be fruitless due to their approval of the previously adopted Master Plan. RECOMMENDATION: Staff would recommend no Council action on this item. 4 1,1D:11g3� RE��1vD till of n01E�`1 May 16, 1984 To Whom It May Concern: RE: Metropolitan Airports Commission 1984-1985 Capital Improvement Programs Received 05/02/84 Metropolitan Council Referral File No. 12129-1 Metropolitan Council 300 Metro Square Building Seventh and Robert Streets St, Paul, Minnesota 55101 Telephone (612) 291.6, The Metropolitan Council has received the Metropolitan Airports Commission 1984-1985 Capital Improvement Programs for review and comment. The Council will be reviewing this in the next few weeks and would welcome any comments you may wish to make. Any cc^ments should be sent within one week. Thank you. JR:ch Sincerely, METROPOLITANCOOUNCIL 1/d/—,4V&"a"' John Rutford Referral Coordinator i miuni,y 5.mlortr F_FEFFAL' METROPOLITAN AIRPORTS COMMISSION P. 0. BOX 1700 ` TWIN CITY AIRPORT ` MINNESOTA 55111 OFFICE OF EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR • PHONE (612) 726.1692 April 30, 1984 Gerald J. Isaacs, Chairman Metropolitan Council 300 Metro Square Building St. Paul, VV 55101 RE: • P:trupolitan Airports Cannission 1984-1985 Capital Improvement Programs Dear Mr. Isaacs: r &'.E7 7' Irnnl ebU�ICII '" "Y 1 H4 The Metropolitan Airports commission, at its February 21, 1984 meeting, approved the remaining 1984 and proposed 1985 Capital Improvement Programs for its airport system. The 1984 program had received Commission approval and Metropolitan Council review previously, however due to modifications since that action the remaining items were presented along with the 1985 program.. A copy of the programs with sketches indicating the areas of construction is attached. The relationship of these proposed projects to a five-year plan is indicated on our five-year Capital Improvement Plan (1986-1990) which is also attached for your information. If you should desire further information, do not hesitate to contact our office. Very truly yours, CW Lawrence E. McCabe Executive Director /jr attach. OFFICE LOCATION-61i0 :41` ""' RE- ,Zrs Bs FJc�ic1 Sa:a:azzy 31, 984 ,N=RA,`CM TO: PLrsi:r, 6 ?lys_ '' D--Mlccrent C.^:mi-_ _ FM: C. wat_rn m-ec-•....r ,iicr_l 0. ?icy, Ci--ecrr of FE: 984-985 CnPIML DTFC� Eats year a crcxscd ==vetect wog= mlatin7 to t:e Mectolitan ,li'2ors cmmisSim ai--,= system f= t:-E fallcw=9 csst+�-'T seascn is oresmted to the c-� i ttt a and C=mLu - .— ace.^va1. ':.`.e 1984 was z=rved in IvAy 1983, hcw+_ver, am to ax :`:caz ase is s= --Meea and arditi= necssarl t_- csri-,*d coerat-,= of the ai--xr`s to 984 rr^je= to be ae_->mlistrd are being meted e=q writs tie ;sccrsed 985 ; zrojec`s. :t is mcessarl beci.•s the ?las;-, desim and het= of t�e 985 prjec`s at t±s rm is or =- = rake - -^ :,:-t cn of t:8 C=5==-i= sea_sas and xtezt'.al F'e rs• and State aid. ' t!: the ?Urni:r, and design-, m=sive -^a^tit cn = atnly f-= FeEaz and State !=ds Grant re for I mal f=ds w-1 rot to iss:ed xi" State `ems be erc=cred until this dxmmtat:rn is st=-- °r ard, in _`act, h- ever so that exact csts can `.,e estal-- s- e . At�_cac° to t.=s ©em is a hr� 2E5C-^t rn and a listj:x; of t:ee 984 =je=s ' and ?Txaed 985 -xoject3, wit,s r-L'•ni:arj cat esti=tes. C e. itgs i-wlr z; lard a ~ �� tsn and en r �rt3l Brae_ assesssE. = wit be br q= tact = to C=L,ss_cn sepa-ratsly _fc: sr.._`:� are �xrle•='. s t-a 'e=rtry= that the c...�5--^. sceci-cii:i 3 `tee List 4 r✓jeS. 2-•:49 and GS''m -4:'x'^--s wr'11 �e tack before t`.e C=ML53iCn f= amen: and wa—tar= x--V- we k Ls 1. r12?liV1I CF . -- !984 XM ? E 1985 y ui5, Say= '� ? Lam^ L MC M i- aT�CC� T_R .rPFCV L. 4. ,•iMM ..r `izel --. - e;r CAPITAT. IITR7M`n PXMM SE t M AIWOMS 1984—]985 1984 �985 ST. PAOL D�INICWN # New Rr way & Buijd Area 3,600,000* Fill Material 6,200,000 Ramey & Twdway 50,000* 6 Overlay Rvyr, T"YS, Apr etc &Other MPL Building PPhab 100,000* Sabaibtal 3,750,000 6,200,000 0 50,000* # perimeter Imad 50,000 prailWe Control Sub -'total 50,000 50,000 100,000* # Secadty Fence 0 S1 100r000 P.`1M_gVE 200,000* # Overlay Pwys, T„ys, :�rcrs, ecc 20,000* # ling Aids 8001000* Building Area Develcpment 1,900,000** darter ?ran 13 Ce;Elcaer. 1,900,000 SUb-?oral 1,020,000 1985 Projects I 22rLret•pr r=d - $50,000 It is mtpcsed a c�.S Ml= a cer'--eu tad sys= at `� ai-xr_ to aL' e=te t`.a ,......,.,i !_� ,4c (f:r1 =Ldt, maintenance yPthe C , etc.) cpeSdt=aLS on the r - ' =xi a . p-moaly approved by the r,m cairn, ' 1984 P*oj Seasit Face - $100,000 ,Oleseoad #,ase of a progrm to P=A&., -A pe^ter seaaity fencrg for the &jxp t. Previously approved by l,..e Cymnssian. nwma rrtIISPY-5,;g E ALP'C 1984 Projec`..S � laanrays Lduws, A== , etc. - $200,000 P,dicslly it is necessarf to acply a bitndroas � ca the rtas�sys, ^.a ta)&ays, etc. to restore the s=-=3 to a ==th even C=d3tioa and icptwe hmkis. c Idi=or's. Prevctsly ap � by the Ca=.ssicn. r,ardi,X Aids - $20,000 A==3eate ravicat'_cr2'_ aids for t=-x x ar: are bei_-q arc zl or safety and cte-" =ate ^P ==5. PrTl ctsly a Vved by ems. _t is =-Ccsed m ;Lu aya 1 ble Mas__ harm= crs� c a_ a :1s ems. ,. ?!an motes. adrii ==a'. ?rer_culy ara-cwe_ by t`a C .znssia . L°85 P:'o'e=� a =o� j the ersc_-r rL: =Jsci �. ±sway and s �ri'? ay v5—1 ro htE �; _E -ately 9.0 to : i. Also s� c e ; the car a area =' ears.^.Sian of t-e eas-/.es: rraa! = 4,000 . rarelee= as ?surd '_'-: ces, xss..`.iY as ei_y as '_486. .. o a • I ,j.�a rd . n `~J a I z N ,fI O o O R AN II —.— I „ G C ••• PLV IOFI y1MK yHyy !•�lLl - .. .• w.. ..3 � III ;:_ � ;ie Ju3 I 1 <yLu IOH •,11 I . . I j li �• I y ' 0 I 1 17 a �I. 11E •v �%f�r ..�.'(r� E.. LJ^'4� yy�N ! •_ I I 1•Ol.l :i .•� II V Pi wn II I I am"O IL IN 11 IIOr•ly 9 ��I WTI lifil.�i I �r Loo,�noo�rta LUn euK. _ wnu• ;aL>_w1 s� r . r �'�+'�Ni—nt m nu• .r u.w wa r,Kl n.l I __T�m.r-- wG�I it � I iw d(• u I wl 1 N l Rd uk, a111 d LIP. [OFt 'e I I ' li ,en lro.l •o11' 1 rm��e �i v. II�$IIS E. �jf��y♦��1, ��N,• ryy,V�'NL�µ� -- �-I�nl„•��� _s —__ ,.... • iae•I1 p,c. )'�I 1-�� artr ... •elt , �fli.�c[164 �r.L as _ LL Aw p� 4 G+dR•( 'gym Ig II ,•n $ y r ; l ".�rl Ili; iK'. •. �lil I�tr acw • � i I y alaa I It 11 , %�E el�'�-� I 9 � t Cam__' ., ♦ ttu , y, ,pI :e4k YILLrOI Of ILfIM( IS i..i�(j .ill ♦ ^ : � E I`� Si3� �{r � y�•yi : ,r I .. rr • x :.Iw'� L � ::. rr ::Pr v pn0,L. loll VILIytt or +=v ; •; (y 0 U N T Y IrIIwI ARK( PARK R A M S E Y - ly• rfa It•-:1 ... .:.L •.a 11•. I-If� CAP IIAt IMPAOVEMENI FROBRAA PROJECTS 0 1981 1905 SECONDARY AIRPORIS 51. PAUL DOBNIONN New Runway I Building Area Fill Material 1,LOO,000 Runway I IAelway I,100,000 Building Area Overlay Rwys., Yuys., Aprons, Etc. 50,000 CFR Building I Equipeent Ministration I Other MAC Building Rehab. 100,000 Subtotal 11150,DDO 6,200,000 FLYING CLOUD Overlay Rwys., iwys., Aprons, Eic. CFR Building I Equipeent Perieeler Road Drainage Control CBYSIAL Overlay Rwys., lwys., Aprons, Etc. Security Fence ANOBA COUNIVILAINE Overlay Rwys., Wye., Aprons, Etc, Landing Aids Building Area Developaenl Nester Plan II Developeent Muter PIlm Phase 2 Developaenl 50,000 50,006 Subtotal 50,000 50,000 1001000 Subtotal 100,000 0 200,000 20,000 800,000 11900,000 Subtotal 11020,000 1 10 CAPITAL IMPROVEME9I PLAN 19% 1981 1980 21100,000 500,000 50,000 3,150, 000 300,000 400,000 700,000 0 $00, 000 1001000 1981 1990 300,000 50,000 50,000 0 50,000 100,000 50,000 300,000 0 300,000 0 0 11500,000 11500,000 0 0 1,500Aa 11500,000 : May 29, PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW RAMSEY COUNTY, 14INNESOTA Regular Meeting u µ� May 14, 1984 AFF Mounds View City Hall 2401 Hwy. 10, Mounds View, MN 55112 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- The Mounds View City COL.Wil was called to order by 1, Call to Order Mayor McCarty at 7:31 PM on May 14, 1984. The Pledge of Allegiance was said. 2. Pledge of Allegiance MEMBERS PRESENT: Councilmembers Linke, Hankner, 3. Roll Call Blanchard,Doty and McCarty. ALSO PRESENT: City Attorney Meyers, Clerk/Admini- strator Pauley and Public Works/Community Development Director Thatcher. ;lotion/Second: Doty/Blanchard to approve the April 4. Approval of 3, 1984 minutes as corrected. Minutes: April 23, 1984 5 ayes 0 nays and April 30, 19 Motion Carried Motion/Second: Linke/Hankner to approve the April 0, 1984 minutes as presented. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried There were no residents requests or comments from 5. Residents Re - the floor. quests and Comments from the Floor Mayor McCarty asked that Item H be pulled. 6. Approval of Consent Agenda Councilmember Hankner asked that Item B be pulled. Clerk/Administrator Pauley asked that a public hear- ing be added to Item A, for 8:15 PM on July 9, 1984, regarding the rezoning of property at 2800 Highway 10. ' Motion/Second: Doty/Linke to approve the consent agenda, as amended, and waive the reading of the reso- lutions. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Mounds View City Council May 14, 1984 ' Regular Meeting --------------------------------------------------------------------- Page Two Councilmember Hankner asked that Item B includes language that shielding be provided. Motion/Second: Hankner/Blanchard to approve Item B, wit s ie ing to be included, 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Mayor Mcr.+rty stated that for Item H, he would like more history on the use of industrial revenue bonds before voting on the resolution. Motion/Second: McCarty/Doty to table Item H. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Councilmember Hankner asked that information also be provided on how money from the industrial revenue bonds is used, as far as who benefits from it. Clerk/Administrator Pauley advised that Congress is expected to take action on the item sometime in the next month, but it will most likely go on to Committee. Motion/Second: Doty/Linke to have the first reading 7. First Reading of o Order finance No. 358, amending the Municipal Code of Ordn. No. Mounds View by amending Chapter 41, entitled "Specific Rezoning", and waive the reading. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Mayor McCarty closed the regular meeting and opened 8. Public Hearing: the public hearing at 7:45 at. Rezoning of Church Triangle Director Thatcher reviewed the proposed rezoning, from from R-3 to R-1 R-3 to R-1. John Matthews, pastor of the Church Upon the Rock Church, stated the Church has a buyer for the property, which they have verbally accepted, on an R-3 zoning basis, and the Church is asking that the zoning not be changed. He stated he was told by Clerk/Administrator Pauley that the proposed use, for a Kinder Care facility, would be R-3. Councilmember Linke stated there was a covenent that the area in question was to be used for parking, and the City does not want it to be constructed, Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported they had checked the development agreement, which stipulates the Church ' must retain ownership of the property for parking purposes, and it was part of the permit for the developer of the original Church building. He stated the Church was advised that any attempt to sell the Mounds View City Council Regular Meeting property would require approval of the City, and the stipulation would have to be waived. Reverend Matthews stated they have not used this pro- perty for parking, and they have purchased additional property to the north, which can be used for parking. He added that they would have an agreement with Kinder Care to have joint use of the parking facilities on that piece of property, as needed. Councilmember Blanchard questioned if the parking lot next to the Church had been enlarged. Pastor Matthews replied it had not but it could be. He added they do not believe the parking requirements are consistent with the size of their congregation, and they have changed their sanctuary, and have less seating now then what they used to have. Attorney Meyers reviewed the 1984 special use permit agreement, and advised the Church was required to retain and maintain the triangular piece of property, and reviwed development considerations, stating that they would have to comply with all setbacks and so forth. Peg Mountin, Chairman of the Planning Commission, explained that the proposed rezoning is to tie the property to the Church, and all church property in Mounds View is zoned R-1. The proposed parking is to compliment the size of the property involved, not the size of the congregation, as the use of the building could change in the future, with different parking requirements at that time. Brad Walton, 2741 Hillview, questioned how Kinder Care would fit in R-3, and stated he was concerned with how property values might be effected. Mayor McCarty explained a day care center is allowable in the Code in R-3, not R-1. Reverend Matthews stated they had also had interest expressed in the property from a Dairy Queen owner and car wash owner. Frank Kampel pointed out the Comp Plan denotes the area as church property. Mayor McCarty closed the public hearing and reopened the regular meeting at 8:00 PM. May 14, 1984 Page Three Attorney Meyers noted the purpose of the hearing is to 9. First Reading bring the property into conformance with the Comp Ordn. No. 363 Plan, and the contemplated future use would not be a consideration tonight, but with the special use permit, Mounds View City Council May 14, 1984 Page Pour Regular Meeting ----------- --------------------------------------------- - the Council could change the requirements. He stated that if the Church could provide 30,000 sq.ft. of parking, the special use permit would not apply. Councilmember Doty stated he was concerned that the singletfamilynot homes couldand ded how many be veloped there. Chairman Mountin replied that there would be room for two homes, but stated it was not a feasible site for R-1 homes, but recommended it remain Church property, and it should remain with the actual site. She also pointed out that for the Church to consider the additional property they had purchased as a park- ing area, it would have to be improved and surfaced and so forth. Mr. Kampel pointed out the 30,000 sq. ft. parking requirement was based on the requirements when the Special Use Permit was adopted. Mayor McCarty questioned whether the City could tie non -continuing pieces of property to the zoning, and whether the City has control over any future uses. He stated that by rezoning it to R-1, the City may be making it into something that could never be f ' developed. Councilmember Linke stated the idea of the triangle was to augment the parking for the existing building, and that what the present owners might want to do should have no bearing on the process being considered now. He recommended Kinder Care come in, stating that they would like to develop, and that they would be willing to augment the Sunday parking. He added that they should not hold up the rezoning process tonight. Reverend Matthews stated that Kinder Care has given the Church a written bid for the property, which the Church has verbally accepted, and there are a few minor contingencies to check into before an agreement would be signed. He added the Church was not aware the property was being considered for rezoning, but they are willing to follow the proper procedures. He stated he anticipates that if the property is re- zoned to R-1, they would lose the sale. Mayor McCarty suggested having the first reading of the ordinance, which would allow approximately 44 days before it would go into effect, which would give the Church time to take action. Attorney Meyers recommended that if Kinder Care would ' like to develop, they should apply for a building permit while the property is still R-3. He also recommended having Staff look at the Church property Mounds View City Council May 14, 1984 Regular Meeting Page Five --------------------------------------------------------------------- to see if there is adequate parking available, He also advised the City should give the Church time to move ahead, because the property should not be rezoned, just to be undone. Councilmember Hankner recommended tabling the rezoning until the first regular meeting in June, to allow the Church time to take the necessary action. Motion/Second: Hankner/Doty to table until the une Ir7ng meeting. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Mayor McCarty closed the regular meeting and opened 10. Public Hearing: the next public hearing at 8:24 PM. Rezoning of 2740 Highway 10 There was no one present to address the rezoning, so from B-3 to B-2 he closed the public hearing and reopened the regular meeting a, 8:24 PM. Motion/Second: Doty/Linke to have the first reading 11, First Reading of of-UrUfnance No. 361, amending the Municipal Code of Ordn. No. 361 Mounds View by amending Chapter 41 entitled "Specific Rezoning", and waive the reading. 5 ayes 0 nays Mayor McCarty closed the regular meeting and opened the next public hearing at 8:26 PM. Director Thatcher made a presentation, showing the two lots in question, which are identified as wetland. Don Schafenhausen, 2824 County Road H2, stated he owns Lot 4, which he has put up for sale, and has been told by the City that nothing could be built in that area. Mayor McCarty explained there are procedures within the wetland ordinance to petition for development. Attorney Meyers advised he could find nothing that would prohibit the rezoning of the property in compliance with the Comp Plan. Clerk/Administrator Pauley explained that if it is rezoned, no buildings would be allowed there without the permission of the City, and the purpose of the downzoning would be to more clearly state that it is untouchable for development. Motion Carried 12. Public Hearing:. Rezoning of 2 Lots North of 7190 Silver Lake Road from R-3 to R-1 Mounds View City Council May 14, 1984 Regular Meeting Page Six --------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. Kampel explained that there was an error on the original zoning map, and this rezonin,a would be correct. 10 Mayor McCarty closed the public hearing and reopened the regular meeting at 8:34 PM. Motion/Second: Doty/Blanchard to have the first read- 13. First Reading ing oTOrdinance No. 360, amending the Municipal Code of Ord. No. 360 of Mounds View by amending Chapter 41 entitled "Specific Rezoning", and waive the reading. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Mayor McCarty closed the regular meeting and opened 14. Public Hearing: the next public hearing at 8:35 PM. Rezoning of So. Corner of Old There was no one present to address the rezoning, so Highway 8 and he closed the public hearing and reopened the regular Cnty. Rd H from meeting at 8:35 PM. R-2 to CRP Motion/Second: Linke/Hankner to have the first 15. First Reading rea ing ot.urrdinance No. 362, amending the Municipal of Ord. No.62 Code of Mounds View by amending Chapter 41 entitled "Specific Rezoning", and waive the reading. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Director Thatcher had no report. 16. Report of Director of Pub- lic Works/Comm. Development Attorney Meyers reviewed the proposal from Trans 17. Report of Plan, Inc, to prepare a technical brief on the Attorney airport development and recommended the Council authorize they be retained to do so. Councilmember Hankner asked if anything had been received back from the other companies yet. Clerk/Administrator Pauley replied nothing had, and they had been sent a letter by the City. Attorney Meyers added that he was not sure anyone else had planned on putting a proposal together. Motion/Second: Doty/Linke to authorize Attorney Meyers to use Trans Plan, Inc. to write the brief. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Mounds View City Council May 14, 1984 Regular Meeting Page Seven -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Councilmember Hankner reported she had attended the Task Force meeting, and she found out MAC has an ordinance, No. 51, for Flying Cloud Airport, which keeps certain types of aircraft out of the airport. She added the ordinance is unique to Flying Cloud Airport and asked if Mounds View could request something similar. Mayor McCarty informed the Council that Ordinance 051 had been adopted by MAC in 1979 or 1980 and since then had granted a variance to this regulation to allow a jet start business jet to exceed field restrictions under Ordinance #51. Attorney Meyers replied he had spoken to them about it before, and he would check again. Attorney Meyers presented a proposed resolution, drafted by Grant Merritt, the slicial counsel for the City, and asked Council approval of the resolution. He pointed out that the resolution specifically states the City of Fridley be asked to join in the effort. There was considerable discussion among the Council regarding the proposed resolution. Councilmember Hankner stated she would prefer writing a j letter to Fridley rather than putting it in resolution form. Councilmember Linke questioned why Mr. Merritt would be representing the City at the June 7 meeting, rather than Attorney Meyers. Attorney Meyers replied that while he most likely would be present, the City has retained Mr. Merritt as co -counsel, for the environmental assessment, so he would be making the presentation. Councilmember Hankner stated she would like to meet Mr. Merritt and see his presentation first. Councilmember Linke suggested holding off on the resolution until the Council has had an opportunity to meet with Mr. Merritt, which would allow them time to contact the City of Fridley and discuss things further: Motion/Second: McCarty/Doty to approve the resolution and send to Fridley. 4 ayes 1 nay Motion Carried There was discussion before the vote was taken on the previous motion. Councilmember Hankner voted against the motion, stating that while the City is paying Mr. Merritt $125 per hour, she would like to meet him and have some questions answered before voting on the resolution. Councilmember Linke suggested tabling the vote until the May 29 meeting, allowing them time to Mounds View City Council May 14, 1984 Regular Meeting Page Eight --------------------------------------------------------------------- contact the City of Fridley and meet with h[r. Merritt, and still take action before the June 7 meeting. Councilmember Doty stated they must give Fridley time to consider the resolution. Mayor McCarty stated the Council must trust Staff and strike while the iron is hot. Councilmember Linke suggested passing a resolution asking other communities to go along with Mounds View, and leaving out Mr. Merritt's involvement. Attorney Meyers stated it was important to know once and for all if Fridley will be joining in. Motion/Second: McCarty/Blanchard to call for the question. 3 ayes 2 nays Motion Failed Councilmembers Linke and Hankner voted against the motion. Councilmember Linke suggested having two separate motions, one authorizing Mr. Merritt to represent the City on June 7, and the other to go to the other Cities. It was agreed by the Council that they would meet with Mr. Merritt at 6:00 PM on May 29. Attorney Meyers advised he would like to keep the present lawsuit in place, as they may be able to make some progress with the new members of the Met Council. Clerk/Administrator Pauley explained the purpose 18. Informational of the meeting was to review the projects with Meeting - 1984 the residents abutting the project areas, and that MSA Street Proj all effected parties had been notified in writing. Director Thatcher reviewed the three proposed projects, and introduced Brian Hoffman, who will be Staff's representative at the project sites. Director Thatcher answered several questions from unidentified residents, explaining that the 3' would be taken evenly, that services would not be put underground as they normally go in the boulevard, that parking would be banned at certain times, that wider streets would help increase safety, and that dust complaints would be handled immediately. Director Thatcher reviewed what an MSA project is and thr eriterid ne-eesgAry to b,- ,onsidered an MS Mounds View City Council May 14, 1984 Regular Meeting Page Nine --------------------------------------------------------------------- In response to a resident's inquiry about moving a utility pole, since his lot had been split, Clerk/ Administrator Pauley stated he would contact NSP and see if it could be moved. He also stated that it is Staff's desire that the project runs smoothly, and anyone with any complaints should contact Staff. Councilmember Linke reported he will be attending the 19. Reports of Ramsey County League meeting with Finance Director Councilmembers Brager on May 16, where they will be discussing computer use by Cities. Councilmenber Linke reported he would be on vacation from May 18 to May 28. Councilmember Hankner reported she had attended the Task Force meeting and spoken with the members about the Anoka County Airport. Councilmember Blanchard reported she had also attended the Task Force meeting. Councilmember Doty reminded the Council of the luncheon for Sandy Gardebring, the new Chairman of the Met Council, on April 23 at noon, at the Radisson Plymouth. Motion/Second: McCarty/Hankner to send a resolution of —congratulations to Sandy Gardebring for her appointment as Chairman of the Met Council. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported he and Mayor 20. Report of McCarty would be attending a Municipal Legislative Clerk/Administ: Board Meeting at the Decathelon Club on May 17 at for 5 PIA. Clerk/Administrator Pauley reminded the Council of the Miller bus tour, which would be leavin; City Hall at 6:30 PM on May 15. He also reported the Millers have asked to bring their tax increment people to the June 4 agenda session. The Council agreed it would be alright for them to come. Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported that We FAA manual of Airport Master Plans, which was referred to by Trans Pan, had been copies for the Council, and the other book is on order. Director Thatcher also advised he has a set of plans for the Council on the NSA streets. Mounds View City Council May 14, 1984 Regular Meeting ---Page Ten -------------------------------------------------------------- Motion/Second: Linke/Doty to adjourn the meeting 21. Adjournment at PM. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried If you are speaking at this Public Hearing, please sign this sheet. Church Triangle Rezoning Name Address /