HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packets - 1984/07/16CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA SESSION
JULY 16, 1984
7.00 P.M.
1. Consideration of staff memorandum regarding "Bug
Zapper" Complaint.
2. Discussion of Grant Merritt billings.
3. Consideration of staff memorandum regarding 1985
First Draft Budget.
4. Consideration of staff memorandum regarding the
adequacy of license and permit fees.
5. Consideration of staff memorandum regarding amendments
to Wetland Ordinance and Tax Increment Financing Policy
resolution.
6. Consideration of memorandum from Public Works/Community
Development regarding Public Works Foreman/Civil
Engineering Technician positions.
7. Consideration of staff memorandum regarding Street
Name Signs.
8. Consideration of staff memorandum dated July 11, 1984
regarding Comprehensive Rezonings.
9. Consideration of staff memorandum regarding Sunset Road
Median Closure.
10. Consideration of staff memorandum regarding Prohibition
of Nighttime Perking on City Streets.
�Y{ 1 n.:•L
ONS MEMO T0: MAYOR AND C
FROM: CLERK.-ADMIN
UATF.: JULY 12, 19
SUBJECT: "BUG ZAPPER" COMPLAINT
Pursuant to Council direction Staff has undertaken two activities
in zesponse to the complaint from Mr. Tom Granroth regarding the
operation of a bug zapper owned by Mr. John Biswanger.
The first of these activities was to undertake a survey of all of
the cities in Ramsey County to determine whether or not any of
these cities regulate the operation of bug zappers and, if so,
what their regulations are. Attached is a survey conducted by
Administrative Secretary, Michele Severson which indicates that
Vadnais Heights is the only city in Ramsey County regulating bug
zappers and they do so under their Noise Ordinance, copy attached,
which prohibits the operations of bug iradication equipment between
the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 p.m. on week days and 10:00 p.m.
and 8:00 a.m. on weekends and holidays unless the noise level of
the equipment is within the sound level setforth by the ordinance.
The sound levels for residential districts during daytime hours are
an L10 of 65 and an L50 of 60 and during the night time hours an
L10 of 55 and an L50 of 50.
I have been advised by Mr. Biswanger, cwner of the bug zapper in
question,that this piece of equipment is manufactured by Emerson
Electronics and that ho has contacted Emerson Electronics and been
advised that the bug zapper in question has a sound level of 30 db
at a distance of 10 feet.
The second ac+g„iry T have undertaken at the direction of the City
Council was to meet with Mr. Biswanger on the afternoon of July 11
to determine whether or not a compromise could be accomplished in
this matter. Attached for your information is a copy of the
Police Reports on this matter which on page 3 lists the compromises
Mr. Biswanger has offered to Mr. Granroth through Sergeant Tim Smith
of the Police Department. These compromised proposals are:
1. Mr. Granroth purchase the bug zapper from Mr. Biswanger
at a cost of $200 or,
2. Mr. Granroth pay for a timer at an approximate cost of
$40.00 which Mr. Biswanger will install and which would
shut off the bug zapper between the hours of 10.00 p.m.
and midnight.
I have been advised by Mr. Biswanger that Mr. Granroth has not
responded to these compromised proposals. Also, Mr. Biswanger
indicated that lie has personally surveyed the rest of his neighbors
and no other neighbor has voiced any objections with respect to the
MAYOR ANC CITY COUNCIL
PAGE TWO
operations of this piece of equipment.
During our conversations Mr. Biswanger communicated information
which was contrary to that given to the Council by Mr. Granroth
at your July 2 meeting. That being the case I requested that
Mr. Biswanger appear before the Council at your July 16 Agenda
Session to state his position in this matter in order that you
might receive as it would both sides of the story.
It would appear from my conversations with Mr. Biswanger that
no compromiEe can be reached on this matter except for Mr. Granroth
agreeing to one of the two counterproposals offered by Mr. Biswanger
through Sergeant Smith. I will be contacting Mr. Granroth and
.. et
advising him of the fact that this item will :,c ..�..a_ .......__.... it--M
on your Agenda on July 16 and inviting him to attend the meeting.
Should you have any further direction to City Staff or require
any other information on this matter we would be more than happy
to do so prior to your July 16 meeting. Please do not hesitate
to contact me.
4
SUPPLEN�'MARY IWEST►CATION REPORT
FrU�t CASE #
t,
A, sty kc.
A1
' J � ✓J2��-v-eus �,c/Jws, � .�-'"i°'�6
�/
��, -� �.�;, �"°'."`,� • . `� ..ram e'�t
SUPPLEMENTARY INVESTIGATION REPORT
Z (YrFENSE;_.� WE
C tilAihlff:
`7�
cv.EE�G�,Cf� 4;1e-c,�c� -eel( .mot.. -<«Le ztmv
SUPPOWARY IWESTIGATION REPORT
�° fASE #
OTLAI
(3yU�26'�torn�&Ve4l
t
eK
Mounds View
Police Dept. SUPPLEMENTARY INVESTIGATION REPORT
OFFENSE:
COMPLAINANT:
CASE
c4maa'
-&'tt
� 4
1
VJuly 10, 1984
In surveying the following cities specifically for ordinances
regulating hours and locations of "bug zappers" only one has
included the "bug zapper" in their noise ordinance. It is
from the City of Vadnais Heights and the copy of their Noise
Ordinance is attached.
New Brighton - none
St. Anthony - none
Shoreview - none
Arden Hills - none
North Oaks - none
Vadnais Heights - copy attached
St. Paul - none
White Bear Lake - none
No. St. Paul - none
Maplewood - none
Little Canada - none
Roseville -none
Falcon Heights - none
Michele
186.030. erations.
(1) Refuse Haulina: No person shall collect or remove
garbage or 75fuse in any residential district except between the
hours of 7:00 A.M. and 7:00 P.M. on Wednesdays of each week.
The date may vary during a week with a holiday.
(2) Domestic Power Equipment: No person shaii operate
a power mower, edger, power device for bug irradication, drill
or other similar domestic power equipment except between the
weekday hours of 7:00 K.M. and 10:00 P.M. and 8:00 A.M. to
10:00 P.M. on weekends and holidays unless the noise level of
equipment is within the sound level set forth in Section
186.040(1).
(3) Construction Activities: No person shall engage,
permit, or allow construction activities involving the use of
electric, gas or diesel powered machines or other power equipment
except between the hours of 7:00 A.M. and 10:00 P.M. on any
weekday or between the hours of 9:00 A.M. and 9:00 P.M. on
weekends or holidays unless the noise level of equipment is
within the sound level set forth in section 186.040(1).
(4) Recreational Vehicles: No person shall between the
hours of 10:00 P.M. and 8:00 A.M. drive cr operate any mini bike
or other recreational vehicle not licensed for travel on public
highways;
(5) Snow Removal Equipment: Is exempt from the above
hourly restrictions.
186.040 Land Use Standards.
(1) Maximum Noise Levels By Land Use Districts: No person
shall operate or cause or permit to be operated any source of
noise in such manner as to,create a noise level exceeding the
limit set in Table I for the land use category specified when
measured at or within the property line of the land use.
Table I Sound Levels By Land Use District
Day Night
(7:00 A.M. - 10:00 P.M.) (10:00 L.M. - 7:00 A.M.)
Zoning Districts L L50 L1 L50
Residential/Wetlands 5
Commercial/Office 7 -
Industriai 80 - 75 80 - 75
The limits of the most restrictive district shall apply at the
boundaries between different land use categories;
ji�., 3
1 MEMO TO: MAYOR AND CITY COON
FROM: CLERK-ADMINISTRAT R
DATE: JULY 12, 3984
SUBJECT: 1985 BUDGET FIRST DRAFT SUBMITTAL
At the July 2 Agenda Session Staff indicated to you that you
would not be receiving a copy of the First Draft Budget on
July 9 but would be receiving it at the July 16 Agenda
Session where Staff would be reviewing it with you. After
extensive work on the budget by individual departments and
the Department Head Team it would appear at the writing of
this memorandum that Staff will be able to submit a budget
for 1985 to the City Council within the 3.21 percent expenditure
increase guidelines previously approved by the City Council.
Our ability to do so, however, is predicated upon our obtaining
a three week extension in the submittal date to the August 6
Agenda Session at which time it is our intention to submit to
you a proposed 1985 Budget in its final form calling for a
maximum increase in expenditures of 3.21 percent. The proposed
budget would include all itemized sheets showing department
requests and modifications made by the Management Team to those
requests.
Also, at the August 6 Agenda Session it is Staff's intention
to submit to you capital improvement -equests with sources of
funding identified and a Department Head priority list for
the capital improvement requests.
Staff would hope that Council will approve the three week
extension on the basis that we will not be needing to submit
a second draft budget to the Council as anticipated in the
initial budget calendar adopted by the City Council on May 6.
Should you have any specific questions regarding our progress
or intentions, please contact me.
MEMO TO; MAYOR AND CITY COUNC "1
FROM: ('LERK_TDMINISTRATD ^ 11
..1.lLfV11DATE: JULY 12, 1989 1�
SUBJECT: STAFF REVIEW OF ADEQUACY OF LICENSE AND PERMIT FEES
Pursuant to the 1985 Budget Calendar Staff has reviewed the City's
current license and permit fees. Based on current State Law which
Prohibits the charging of license and permit fees in excess of
that reasonably necessary to enforce and administer those licenses
and permits Staff would not recommend any modification to the
current license and permit fee schedule which was established by
the City Council on June 12, 1982.
Staff will, however, be submitting to you at a future date the
recommendation revising the fees charged by the City of Mounds
View for water service restoration and a water meter with remote
reader. These two items should be increased to reflect more
accurately the expenses incurred by the City for personnel costs
and equipment costs respectively.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends no increase in license and
permit fees as established by Resolution Numbers 1462 and 1570,
copies attached, except for fees charged for the purchase of a
water meter with remote reader and water service restoration.
'���ryitJ
MEMO TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNC L
FROM: CLERK-ADMINISTRAT
DATE: JULY 12, 1984
SUBJECT: PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 48
ENTITLED WETLANDS ZONING ORDINANCE AND RESOLUTION
NO. 1434 ESTABLISHING POLICY GUIDELINES FOR TAX
INCREMENT FINANCING
Pursuant to Council direction after a recent presentation by
representatives of the Millers, staff has reviewed Chapter 48
of the Municipal Code establishing a Wetlands zoning Ordinance,
Resolution Number 1125 setting guidelines for the issuance of
tax exempt industrial development bonds or loans by the City
and Resolution Number 1,434 establishing policy guidelines for
tax increment financing, copies attached. As was mentioned by
City Attorney Meyers at your June 18 Agenda Session he has
prepared a proposed amendment to Chapter 48.07, C. to delete
the current language and replace it with the following language.
C. Agreements. Notwithstanding any other provision
of this code to the contrary, the City and an
owner applicant of lands abutting lands owned by
the City may by written contract permit the
development of wetlands as part of an integrated
plan, involving 40 acres or more, wherein the City
would participate in the development of the total
parcel, and where the development would reasonably
conserve and preserve andwould enhance the environ-
ment by providing facilities that would protect the
public health, safety, and welfare.
During the June 18 meeting discussion occured regarding what other
parcels of undeveloped land in the City might benefit from the
proposed amendment as outlined by City Attorney Meyers. A review
of undeveloped land in the City of Mounds View abutting City parks
or other City land reveals that there are 6 parcels that could
possibly comply with this provision except for the fact that all
are ,mailer than 40 acres in size. These parcels are identified
on the attached map with acreage listed. Of these 6, four are
impacted in one way or another by the wetlands ordinance and could
only develop wholely or partially by being able to comply with this
exception provision.
A review of Resolution Number 1125 which establishes guidelines for
the issuance of tax exempt industrial bonds by the City has resulted
in the conclusion that no provisions of this resolution would
currently be prohibitive towards industrial or commercial development
in the City with the following exceptions:
MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
PAGE TWO
1. Special purpose type struotures not adaptable to other uses.
Projects requiring financing for less than $750,000 if other
than the sophisticated buyer non -recourse mortgage revenue
note or bond financing is to be used.
3. Financing for retail or service establishments or businesses
or multi -family housing.
Such is not the case, however, with Resolution Number 1434
establishing policy guidelines for Tax Increment Financing where
under Item No. 6 it is stated, "The City will limit tax increment
financing for projects proposed by non-profit, property tax
paying entities." The intention of this provision is to prohibit
tax increment financing projects to anything other than non-
profit property tax paying entities. To make Resolution Number
1434 more supportive of business development Staff would recommend
that it be amended bit removing the current language under Item No.
6 and inserting language consistent with that of Resolution Number
1125 wherein it does not favor special purpose type structures not
adaptable to other uses and financing for retail or service
establishments or businesses or multi -family housing.
This type of amendment to Resolution Number 1434 would make the
guidelines for financial assistance to business development more
consistent in nature.
Staff would request Council direction with respect to the proposed
amendments to Municipal Code Chapter 48 and to Resolution Number
1434.
ORDINANCE NO. SII
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
ENDING THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF (HE CITY
MOUNDS VIEW EY CREATING CHAPTER Al.
EILAND ZONINO ORDINANCE"
felt Council of IN City of MPuNs View does Info
ordain
CHAPTER al
WOTLAND ZONINO ORDINANCE
AI 01 TIN, Council Findings, Polity. Porpoise, and
Meant
SUNIWUM I. Citation Setllon a 01 to AI.IS may to
Cited AS IN Wetlands OrlliNnce.
Subdivision 7 Findings ono purpose$ The council
firm that wetlands within the City, as Pori of IN
ecosystem, are eribcal to Ine present and future health,
SAlely. and Control Milan of IN land, animals. and
Al within IN City, As well As within IN Rill Clerk
Watonlyd District; met niatim end cal
the
all Kinds, IN purP-ua An me Crather are:
A. TO preserve wetlands In as natural a stare al
possible to Serve as natural torchlight and blMllon
acres for surface when: to regulate tot me of ten
Adjacent to the Wetlandf In order to protect the natural
IMc11M of the Wellandt At oravlae for the protection.
nabilelt of the NMI; to provide for IN protection of
Iresh water supplies from the Conger at drougenl.
overdrlfl. pollution, or mismanagement; to secure
safely Irom Ifgedt to reduce the financial th rOMS
imposed Vion the coned jolty through rescue and relief
elforls "Callow by the occupancy or use of areas
subject IO periodic IloOping: to prfveM Ion O lilt,
properly damage, and the loses and risks alotilled
with Ilat conditions; to reduce the llnanclal burdlnl
imposed upon the Community INouph correction of
erosion problems that. With proper loresltll, could be
evalad; to avoid the fimnclal burden m the need for
the community to reclaim AS Water Ouallly; and to
prntrve the location. Character AN 1X1M1 of AblUNI
drainage courses.
B. The public Mideast netessBaln found land Ulf
development, as land Is a limited and IrnplaceNle
resource, and the lend within IN MUNCIWIIII' It A
retWrce 10 be developed In I mamer which will Count
In minimum damage Ids the duality of Zile and to
properly and Oveat to health and recruC11M of PfIVAl1
and public ICOMMit Ion cauted by drainage problems.
Subdivillm S. Moans. If Is lurlmrmore Ire InIMI m
the CITY 10 effectuate the purposf O this Ordiname
a map designating existing IuntlloMng
I are to be projected from alnnlAnl.
e community awareness of The value of
a
rid
will
E. TO apply IeCNdguil Well is density 1Nnalm to
VtVMMI pr&peNla In Ordfr to minimize relief of
pfrmtible WMAct to Open Space, and la Pre vo
1111101411 In their natural %lilt.
F.ToellabliMMIANDYWhithtttaln"lande may
be 0lectd In the public clomlin tar purposes of
N. TO rrltc ipCal atsistnum ml;;i - r::trltbMt
m properly that air required or this Credit.
I, IO eslnlilh A listen, of plrmdl and enforcement
14 e11etlVAle the Intent of Mil Ordlnhmt
4101 Welland lining Onlndl Tho Chapter shill
wit 10 Welland Irlrg 0 ire tls Which are pe.leally
,denWltd on the (Ming map entitled, "City of Mounm
Via* Welland Janina DdIreI Map." an official CON of
Which Man be on hit ,n Im Office O IN Cheek
AdmOnAle'af And lhallbe available for int@Mon and
Mpying upon IN term%end CondillMl as 111AOhVifd be
the City 1b.s mac may lit amwided by foul MAN al
IlrmAl.M vote 01 Inv CWMII Alter Public Having and
mloe as {et put In Chapter A 01 IMI CON. but Welland
(Ming district% may Met N ftlrf0red from IN map
umen.t tan be INWn 1061 the Ofiglnal 14112tiaboor it in
error ar that COmilions nave Changed.
A 01 Stool The Welland IOn,np dlllfltl {hall overlay
the toning districts nabliMed pursuant N Chapter A
of Init Code or A amended, N that any parcel at fond
IYing in a Welland (Ming district shill also lit In we at
within a wetlands IMIng district %hell be subject to the
ItCluilemenn eslatlilhed In this ar0lnante, as well 11
reflricllMs and requdemellll esnenWd by store
apONlble ordloinCts and regulations of the City.
Within each Welland reeling district, all bus Mall be
Nrmilled In Accordance with IN regulelbns let Ine
un tiVing IMIngdlllricl,provided,hawfnr,IhlllMh
net must AIM selilly IN Additional raUlumMlt
SUOulvillon I. Dimensional Requirements A
minimum maximum setback. yard rM"EMMIL pr
truelure bright or site established IA Chapter 40and 47
of the Municipal Code.
SuOdivil.m 7. Development. The awltrucliM, In
statlalion or alleraliM at any shu"un, the eetfatlion
clearing or other alterallon of terrestrial or bil
vegetation. Idea or the course, current or crdse 1ecIIM
of any water MAY Or wtfrCourit Or IN divitim of land
Into parcels Pursuant to Chapter A of I:e Municipal
ewe.
SuOOivnlon S. Illudlze. AnYlhlor, manufactured,
contlNfled. 01 Attend on the ground. NHludlng belt hat
limited to, bill diros. lent, sheds. portable structures
Vol culverts Ind omit slmllar items.
Subdivision A. Person. Any Individual, firm, car,
peOnM. Parlrfenap, al10clation or other private or
"corm
derived
A. AnY mlurah altered Or artificial walerpeurae
which has definlul bids and bank$ rapo0le of can
dueling Confined rump frame folderol limit. We1M
course beds nit Clearly &limo shall be peIINHId 10
Imluft that area which would be Inmdaled by rumll
resulting from a 71 hour nlnllll having a recurrence
Interval of pine In Ind yam.
B. An altered wattMlne It that which has be"
SIIKIed by manmade Charged In Ilroighllning,
&etatmg. Moral Or wldebrup the Original Memel.
mpea by men writer have was m
1 WAt4ourst The limits of the
are confined alb that area which mid
un011 InUltlng from a Ilorm Acting a
minana on IN City O Mound$ View Welland thing
District Map which Includes the Wetlands and Welland
Center area.
Subdivision e. Welland plains" Dldrld. That area
tributary to the Welland toning District as alimared
an the CITY 01 MWndf Vlew Welland Zoning D111rid
Map.
410$ Welland Zor.ng District RMula11M1.
Subdivision I. Except If hereinafter Ipcllleally
penellted, no avelopmfnl, tilling, grading, peeping,
draining, eaavitlM, hardcover, temporary or phi
maNAI111V<IVIL gnINeIIML 11pef: entered, mitt or
other allerallMi mill be allowed within a Wetland
(Ming Metric' without lint hoving 611181111118 Welland
Alteration mrmll from Ina CITY.
Subt ivlshm 7. No buildings. other thin ecOSticry,
An /Aliment 10 IN "lie at
cal Improving, maintaining, of
illroulimly obtain Advice are lNelllamvarlous emitting Inv area for drainage, PNIW
Iminlal al7entla and pMltalOnall 111 Mt livid CIA or other Puril etprelled M tell CA
water biology. hydrology, and civil tnglmrirt. Subdivision I. Nomwilllltanding the
Chr:tar /00l Ibis Code. IN following anal apply to all
lands praMled 10 be lubdmded and lying within a
Welland IMIN dlllfltl.
A. Minimum Ire lilt — N.aN $quiet Jill,
O MIMOMUm lot width-. Its feet at menured It the
building moat`. IIm.
C All SIIVC1irEl MAllbe OINC k Al least too net from
In' Welland.
Subdinlionl Erdung Pu<1U 41RHOed. on the dill
of EA&CIrm Ical IMPIMMAKe. still be ConSiOled Nn
conform -Ma P[uwAnl In IN provisions at Chapter A of
this Coded IN ptcal doll ml mil the redy"whoon 01
Inn Chapter and R Ine following canddionl am:
A Ant portion of Ine Parcel 11 COMaimd within lot
seta alno s as the "Welland Area" In the, Chapter; or
Is II al 1.411 M Pr[MI bl a parcel Or at staff 7.aN
sg0are feel of the parcel, Whichever it less. Mall be
COnfalmd within IN "Welland Buller Arta' 11 Office&
In Mil Chaplte,
A Oi Permits.
Subdivi$lon I. The loilm info ectiihfin In of new a
Milano Hiring dislrltl SNIT require 1 *attend
alleraliM permit.
A. Toe dipping, drfdeing, filling, drool or In Any
WAY alleringgr removing any material from I welland.
B. The removal of regrtalibn within ant wetland or
Ine removal el vegetation within So Ian of pia Welland.
word to shall I public hints",
C. Tot COmINCIiM. alleraliM. Or removal of any
with the HOW of Water And or Pending papatllY.
F. Disposing of mnorOMic watt malerlill in
eluding, but ml limited Ia. dem0lithM pearls.
G. InSlollaIIM Or mainlMAnce 01 esIMIIAI services.
SubdivlDM 7. In nnflOorenon of in application for
IN Issuance for a Welland alteration perml, the City
shall require that the applicant furnish and supply Such
Information as required In 41.061461. In acting upon a
Welland alleraliM permit aOplltatlm, the City Nall
confider all relevant factors specified In tame fKINN
of In;% Chaptt, Including:
A. Tm petenmlll danger to lilt and Property due 10
increased Ilcap Ill or vdKlllef Caused by an
trbeehmenls.
B. The rolallMSlilp of the Proposed of to the Cam.
preneasive Plan And Ire Impact of the proposed wt an
IN wetlands In The surrounding area.
C. The Impact of the proposed was land alteration on
Ihe phosphorus stripping tspaclly of Im welflN.
Subdivision 1. Pirmllf Standards. NO permit MITI be
issued UnhM the Council finds all determiml That the
proposed de"IOPriMI comolin with the following
canards:
A. Filling. A minimum amount of filling may be
elleWed ImiM Aecelory for theme of properly out only
0" It will mil have a substantially pr Significantly
t lverN effect As determined by the CoumIL upon the
Iacigical And hydrological cnerantlnin of the
Welland; "We, In m CHI hall IN repricllonl set
Wt lilt" On total aMounl at filing be oRNnd. Same
IN total amount N Illllng Which can be pelminN is
Ilmind, the CNlndl When MnsWerino a mrmll sp-
Dlicallon. shall a0elleer opal appartbNnMl 41 till
ipponunily to Welland owing district properly.
1. Any filling Mall ndl Come the total natural flood
a eleimn Comeau In it hours over IN wible avoiapeO
wetland drainage district.
7. Tole filling thall mil coy" the total natural
pNsprlonA stripping capacity, as established In me
Ramsey Soil and Watt Comervoli0n District rt port or
as amenod per proYNims of trill Cmute, of the
Welland 10 fill below the pNlphorus promfellon of the
Welland drainage dililitt for Its protected tnflowdnt.
7. Only lilt WatlnilallY free of chemical (Allnlnn
and organic wastes, as dalermuHd by the Council, may
W used.
A. Flllim shall be ferried foul as Af to minimize Me
Impact on vegeltlim,
B. Dredging msv beal'owddnlywhen Itwlll Met nave
a Substantially or tignillanllY advent Older uPOrf In*
eC01ogI061 and hydrological CnAalerillitl 01 the
Welland n alermlNd by the CPuALII. Onpalng, when
bowed, shell be limited as lollowc:
1. It MAII be facility 10II Ids miinlMile the Impact on
not simliitanmil' entries He Wolf flow
S. won In IN Welland will ml be "Nofrood Offing
IN breeding NINn O wllefMwl 01 IIM (pawning
"AM.
DI$Chlrgel.
I. NO part O all 900l191 d11peN1 IYIIMI NQUIrl"
on fang. or In grouN offal ell min INII be KKlitd
clever thin 100III from NA Welland. All On 11m t In
ofmhd sewage dllpelil systems INII Men cfntll In
WI In MIMegla Rill A. MCAR ANA, "Individual
Samoa Tllalmenl leslern SIANlydi.,
S Organic waste Which would normally be disposed of
at a solid waste disposal Hie Of Which would Normally
W ddcharOK iota a wvi disposal IYllem or lower
stall NO W oarelq or ImPrecllr ddcNrpd 10 a
Welland
S Erosion Control MNSUset and (tlMti" facilities
HWII he put in pace prior to commMComen1 01 earth
dy"lopnlrm c"st"'I'M Ile m at to lima foil Iasi
from I,w"wIopmenl ldt IO fill more Into In ISI Ions
per aloe Par rear
A Sed.mml Ylad from COMIrYctmn all aaOf
tributary 10 Will, Adl shM NI pe more INn Iwo III hills
Per fare per year
S ins applicant IOr the Wetland 011arali" permit
until pe required la WlnonaNlf that alter Ins
development is,Ompleed. The COnadi"'Onme lilt will
be stabAded Such that May Yearly 10.1 lots both the site
will NI by greater thin 01 lone per are off year.
6 Sediment And fall lon shall be determined VMifing
the "Universal Sod Loss Egwll"" as defined by Ins
U S Drpartmml of Agriculture kit Conservation
Service Technical Field Guide is provided tar Ramsey
Sod Ana Water CosservarlM District
D Storm Water Rudolf. A minimum inareale In
volume of 11ofm water ru.Nll to I Welteng Ir,m a
NvelNment r At am natural wlumv Of fuGGll MAY C
.u..... ,.a..,. ii-ilt.1v e1 me al Oropeftl but Chat
delfrmired by IN CWMII, --vane mso vwn'I"
eColooitil and hydrological chafAaerhtics of Inc
Welland,: however, ll no cast shall The restrictions M
funce set WI bit" be exceeded. final the total in
,(pale in ruMN which Can be permlltrd It Polled, ale
Cwn.il whm ConsiO¢ing permit applications shell
Confider the tau At IPK1Ii0fIMM1 Of fUM" INrsltt
oppMtunlly to wellimi properly within the same
wetland toning dislrlct.
I. Storm water runoff Irom a dewlOPMMI May de
directed 10 the Wetland only "M subSIAMlallY. AI
determined by the CWMII. fret of SIR, dlbill, And
chemical pollutants. and only at rates which will all
Substantially, as determined by the Caudell, disturb
vegetation or increase turbidity.
T. The Proposed KIIM shell NI cause storm setter
ru"If from the welland to eke pit,# W a half Which
would exceed the natural fall 01 NNoII.
S. The we lily of water Infiltrated to Ihewaler Table or
Of cowl
wetland
am 14
hours
plafohorus %tripping Capacity at IN wtlllnd to ten
WIoM the projected pallPhOr l pbdUCIIM from IN
wnole developed Welland watershed.
E. Building Constraints.
I. The Iore1111Mr aewllonol buildings PfrMIIIed In
a wetland stall a 61 least hvw 171 flat above No
elevation OI cos adjacMl Milano boundary.
I_ NO Wvelopnom mall par allowed whim will M
danger In* health, Solely, or welfare W parent, ar
Which may result In unusual end MA[rA"A"t colts Of
utility It" breakages OUP IC mil IlmlfelloAl. Including
nigh IfOlt 611011.
F. Vegetation. RtMOV11 Of ve91111IM witaln a
,attend Coning dls'rilt Shell be pelmlRrd only WIIM
such work has Men Approved or the City In accordance
with IN Standards of IMI Chapter, Add Only when
reasonably required for Ins pllCem"t Of 11NC1Vre16nd
we a publicity.
SuMlvisioo 1. Conditions.
A. 1. A welland Kerallon Permll May of IPPrOwd
wbiecl 10 COMOHO"t With cONlllanf rlM"bl1 Ind
NCINary t0 ensure COMpIANf with Ion reRUIreMMll
contained In 4106, Subdivisions L 7 And 7. Such COm
dili0l May, Among Other MIIte11, Ism" the $let' kind.
or Character at the Proposed nod, require the Con
fINCIIM of alarm *else detention facilities ar oB.er
IN
addition to INII %panl.arq ono in ism unyn. r.
Chapter AO as II dll$ns necessary IC` protect I" public
aware. solely, and Visitors. Including IN posting Of
Iullicilnl %urete Is gU1Wm" Conformance 10 The
by 1/I and development controlls Provided ire Chapter
St Vat me MUluNpal COW mAY allb de rKUited.
S A Writerd 811,141.011 permit MAY Of PIMMd
coextensively With any OlMr nop11ca110n for YUOdivilion
M :wlt;wsl use Mfmd fold B that may be
required under olher provisions OI the MUMIClMl Code.
B. ins following drlwmos And nnibds man be In
Crucial with a permit IOpti1111"
1 INNowi and Address of the subdivider, developer.
and alder
7 A legal description of the proposed We With a map
sllow,ng .b location wilt INd,calons of private access
rods, nillinp Of proposed public rOldA,ll *'thin and
$urroind.N the deVIVOpInMI file.
7 Mull dad adKwtt WSCripllonol all cannot the
dperal.on and or P(OpeSrd pnyHWl change&
a. A Ioilsurve , Tspot Me Proposed development site.
S. A topographic map of Ion area with ,onlCur In
formal" 1t Iwo 17) Idol Intervals or SPaI tltvatinns at
Iwo hundred c7001 INe Intervals and at I 1,0610111al
scale of OM 11) than IO ant hundred 1I00I feel or larger.
6. A Whiled alit plan of IN PLOP I INWIN
proposed drainage, grading. and IanasCIPing.
1. A 1,11 design map showing tot 1 Walion of flitting
and Imufe man made Ivatuns within IN site and to a
ortolhtwelland drainage awr... peungary. wnimenr
Is shorter.
1. Imormllion on sensing dralgw and vegatotiM 01
all lands within late %IleAnd to a alliance of live hundred
ISWI left surrounding Inc ells or to the *friend
drainage district Modify, wnlchcwr Is fhonM.
e. The have Pori30 for tommmeemml and compollOn
of the OtMIOpmedl, Including time for Staging of
Wvelopmenl, it applicable.
10 Design Specification and plan for all wolmMl and
erosion Control ownyo 1 as Wall as all grading Ind
drsirage IKUriMORas and practical.
C. In In, Case of a minor develOpmMl Or Change and
or development involving a Stage IAMIIV Wbched or
Single elected ffslWoce, :te •ppllcarl may bt
exempted from stria COmpllancl 10 Ceftoin
fKulCaleedlf of this ordinance, upon approval by No
City Council
Subdivision S. Time of Permit — BamaMs and
Renewal$.
A plrmlttet Shell degln lot work Authorlled by the
permit within Airily eOl BAYS Irom Ine Cattle Issuance
at the Permll unless a different date from In* cOM
Momemenl of wort IS fee forth In the Parfait. The
Permitter male complete the work swalflled be the
Wrmil Villain IN time limit $pecllied M the permit,
montnslrom IN dale of itsuan,e Oman such time llmu
Is extended by IN Council. The plrmlll" still Ntlly
the City at teal larl, eight 141 hours prior to the
commencement of murk, Should IN Work NI Or oom
menped of specllied herein, In* permit Mall become
laid.
4/01 Exception$$ Permit.
A. Emerpnaef. Upon the dxlfialion of an
emm0enty be the Council and In Issuance of a permit
B. "Po"
Upon I.OIICAlton and approval by the
W nCl.6 per30nmaY Ilpllr Ofmalmalnany lawful we
lend fliftlng on IN Oat of add ofIM Of Ihit CNp11,
C. Prior Agreement$. The Cougll may permit
tvtlommem 01 parctll Whitt Ilwre art Igrall
tlerad Into and are existing between the City and the
Anal applicant relaNd, 10 Me Sit@ and of MOpOKI
rief IO the adoption Of this Ofdin nce.
13 01 Olvllopminf DMlllyand Part Land Dedication
redil Tseaslors.
Subdivision 1. When land to be developed Includes
etlaril,lnedewlapef IherKl met r1Caw a treoll for
It undevelopable ParIIM 01 Sold MllaN, either:
A. board IN WdiclllON of UM requirements under
luni(Ipal coa, Chapter 4.13, Ping and Playground
coicatlm, NI exceeding the imWml of Ins
eve10 able lance In IN development papesaU or
B. she development me, Do Imm111ird 0 K NI 10
(card twice the Illmwble land let Militia
rescribed under Chapter$ 10 and 47 ri the Cede
Noticed, however, that Said lmflsided IIN w1 must
(M111IMI with 11,41111 retaliation Olmmsloni.
arkad reauiramwle, and Sireemng, IMCIN ANo
1InAlIM of A. B, and C soon at agreed
'Afarpheohtivsoftlyd City, SOON
tCommunity
7. UpeA 11111111 at any of the C111011
"legal must 6erfl In a recordable
the wtijads Ihe.DId Udll Not to CAN
or
eei...].aim ev ina Coo se. for which
a
Al de. Acquisition of Introlll In Land. The
municipally may acquire. pillulnl to law, lot fil10 or
tosemenl rights. by deddallM, pill, purchase, #MIMI
domain, In Iorililurl, I1111ftId @little, part of all al
try wati1N1 or land IdIACmI. 601,I11N, CCMIOU(i Or
AIIKIIng wtlllnp1. 101 the OWPOW 01 yr"er"O Such
ts", and Molesting IN publrt health, S1111r. Ind
wrllarr. Charges dulalntee br Chapter TOXIC` Cate r
4701lne MuliuPal Code or br other all,""Kle tsV
be ufto to holote the acgumlrodS AVINI,md' ro
To, CWMiI mnl abatr, Inose Dael and as%"
*.thin WI'lland% As aUlm,iftd by law
a 10 RKpehilbllte Milner the Jfoanet of 6 pe
Col comld.ance WIN Ins cOno'hoo N'tol, NO, wiln ON
p oysiomal Ind CNAPIfr. mall fallen any per10n from
adr respon%ibliv otherwise Imposed by low 101
damages to actions or MapertieF. nor shill the
swathe of ant permit hereunder serve 10 .Mmp IN
liability on the mumciMGle or IUOIIiCids of employees
I01.0furf ar damage Is pens or prodefty A Parma
nlued pursuant 101niS Chapter Mall ngt stuns She
Mrmitlee of the Incom-bids, at COMMON wan Inc
other rKWrementl established by law, regulation Of
ordinance
at 11 Penally Any persen wN VIOIAIIS IN MOViliNt
of this CNPIIf Shall W guilty of a misdemeanor. Each
Oil dulIN which slid violation exists 11 1 Stplrlle
clients. Any VC311110d 01 hall Condit is A OsgliC
nuisance A'A may Ion enioined by Civil KIiM. Collect
tit ul
of INe
rrmi
W"
to any Older MKM's Properly or work.
I Special AaaTmml. Tot MNtrtY wfthln A
area wetland which Is resirictrd hereby Pr tar
a W"IOMNrit of other warictl" tnmmt 11
,ad to IN munIcip111ty INTO flat be sub0cl 10
special assessment lot IN calls of poblle Im
❑Met lot which Such MillimeMs ere Wlarrlled
Col t0 Chapter 76 at the Municipal Cow.
I. Varlinet And ApPe111.
Iivisim 1. Saint at otmmiw PrgdcoO In this
All, the eppllWll" for village Cr appeal mill
lasses KCOMIN 10 IN prdeedurt $Patllird lot
aessingol variance and appeals in Cnepler ap of
uniapel Code.
IiNMAN 7. No wflmCt MOY of granted
allow Any of that is Prohibited In IN is
Patrimonial to the protection 01 %Uri$Ct end 04M
water Wpolles.
B. Increase lot financial uurdenS IMpoSed M Me
community ImWM Increasing f:oMt and Overflow of
weer onto lane fine within this City aroma itnd heal
edlbcetll to RICO! Conk.
C. Be NO In k"PIN with land use plane IN PISMIng
obICCflws to, No City 0l which will lt ,nnorcmear
Cause danger 10 file of Properly—
O. Be IMom llcan With the 01,11011Kt" fnCWflaing
land was camoatAilt with the prIWVAIIM Of m1
natural lane Cities, ngsiatlM and Ine marsh" and
wetlands Within IN CITY.
E. loss" 01"100MMI Of land And water ortas
essential to C,mim" the rapid
NN11 at SUriKe *flat temporary
Which 1CON101bI1lflwithholding
t 1* down
stream floating, or Water pollulbn, or development of
land Ind after iron Which PrOVIW OfNAd Water
11cl argil, Or 1111,111011111111 which di mialMtl She lend or
Niter are nectile!" e
water Ioiimillp portion 01 Mwr aprecipitation.
ion.
Subdivision 7. No Permit or vaflance Mall of Mixed
unless IN spplitanl, In W WOr1 Of his eppIICHIM, Mall
submit engineering data, W rv/y%, site plans and other
Information ^ e City may requilr11n order to deter
MIN the effects m such developmml on the affected
land and water areas.
41.15 Welland Ioaing District.
Subdivision I. Welland genlng District Map. Putili
10 Chapter n C2. IN Welland fining districts co1lWced
In the referenced welland 1"Ing district map Art
i1VlsiCn i. Ieilull". The wallana loning district$
Wed in SuNIvW" I and 7 :ban Let herlbY
itM 1% wet11N soling dicrlcb Ion flit
guilty.
o Oy1NCWNlIp the Cltyal MWndl VIMMIN
fly of SopemOfr. I"?
it and passed by INe Cor ll Of IN CITY 01 Mounm
M Ihit911h day of OClodef. 1917.
STt
Owns
Divilisdop
CIId•Alminlllr1111'
APPROVRD AS TO FORM.
Richard Mayors
City Attorney
IBulklld. Oct. 21. 11671
Sprid
LAW;
_41
-STREET
_Q_F . - 0 L A 1 1. f
A
—4.
N
p
a A
I mil
H I
NIP
- ---------
;VVIIII: Q
i F.
RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA
0
11
M&YyY 1
Aibk MEMO TO: Clerk -Administrator and City Council
FROM: Director of Public Works/Community Development
DATE: July 11, 1984
SUBJECT: STREET SIGNS
Attached please find a copy of two quotations for 200 street
signs with white lettering on a green background. The quote from
Newman of Jamestown, North Dakota is $1,590.00. The quotation
from Earl F. Anderson and Associates, Inc., 9864 James Circle,
Bloomington, Minnesota, is for $1,568.00. The signs are budgeted
for purchase in 1984. The quotes are presented to the Council
because the purchase policy states that if a purchase is between
$1,000 and $10,000, the purchase may be made only after obtaining
two or more written quotes from suppliers and the purchase shall
be awarded by the City Council.
RECOMMENDATION: I recommend purchasing the signs from Earl F.
Anderson & Associates, Inc, for an amount of 51,568.00.
The signs are proposed to be installed in the area north of
County Road H, east of Silver Lake Road, south of County Road H-2
and west of Edgewood Drive in the southcentral area of Mounds
view. This is the area where many of the street signs have
faded.
SWT/bc
Attachment
EAPL F. ANDERSEN AND ASSOC., INC. *Park awAWK l Eq*Mm 61AWWE. O SOW
UAW jwA arc% SbornkVw, MN SMI 0 FIMM Syrle" 4 TbeK pmutb Top-ir wATSLim1-666.664.66266612-M-MO •sMFumMbV •cuuanS"mdMadMp
• Lmun Emitww*W • Tta fa Meevq PmdLeb
t n rdnerr cdrwAtlna. dnlan. YraA r+d Nww6on Nrrlon.
aNaaMdSbdm SMtep
City of Moundsview
2401 Highway North 10
Moundsview, MN 55112
Actn: Gary Kardell
We are pleased to quote you the following:
QUOTATION
Date July 6.
Your Ref. No. Street Signs
TERMS: Ne130 Days ❑
To Be Arranged ❑
QUANTITY
DESCRIPTION
PRICE EACH
TOTAL
Approx.
200
E-450 Engineer Grade Reflectorized Scotch-
7.84►,56
B.vo
lite Street Sign Plates on .063 Aluminum,
punched and notched to fit existing bracket.
White lettering on Green background.
*Price based on making approximately 20
name changes.
lb ll
IZA,co
i
SUB -TOTAL
Liv OF o`;
f .1,i75 ylE,y o-; (Materiel Only) SALES -TAX
�
^• FREIGHT
TOTAL
O.B. Factory $1 Destination ❑ WE ARE AN EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
iloomington
ShhipmenIpment epprox. N .1Bya attar receipt of order.
NOTE: This quotation valid for 30 days. _ //
Please write for confirmation after that date. By Z.—u�� —
/Michael P. orsey /
DATE � P.O.
G
*"pod-4: AJFLL:MAAI S'/G+A!^
Sj�/•2 Oil, ?..4-r tJAoCr.l S!itin,
IMUM
MWIMMIN
son
El
MIN
�
�■ice
jbn-n F
MEMO TO: Clerk -Administrator and City Council
FROM: Director of Public Works/CoRanunity Development)jo
DATE: July 11, 1984
SUBJECT: COMPREHENSIVE RE20NINGS
Attached please find a letter from Mr. David Licht of Northwest
Associated Consultants. My discussions with Mr. Licht involve
arranging budgets for two items. The first one, although he
avoided it in his letter, is to arrange a budget for answering
the question, does the Comprehensive Plan justify the Planning
Commission's recommendation to rezone approximately 10 pieces of
property along Trunk Highway 10? In a phone conversation with
Mr. Licht today, he indicated that a budget of $1,000 is
acceptable to him. The second item is to arrange a budget for
the 1985 update of the Comprehensive Plan. Mr.. Licht indicated
that a $5,000 budget for this update is acceptable to him. We
hope that the Metropolitan Council will help fund the 1985
update.
Attorney Dick Meyers indicated that he could attend the July 18,
198d, Planning Commission meeting at 7:00 p.m. to discuss the
legal implications of the comprehensive rezonings. He verbally
indicated to me that a budget of $100 is acceptable.
I recommend transfering $100.00 from the contingency fund to pay
for Attorney Meyers' time. I need your direction on the
$1,000 budget for Mr. David Licht.
There is no action needed on the proposed $5,000 budget for the
1985 Comprehensive Plan update at this time.
SWT/bc
Attachment
NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS INC.
July 9, 1984
Mr. Steven Thatcher, P.E.
Director of Public Works/
Community Development
City of Mounds View
2401 Highway 10
Mounds View, Minnesota 55112
RE: Comprehensive Plan Update
File No: 802
Dear Mr. Thatcher:
As we discussed by phone this morning, our office just received your mailing
on the zoning changes today.
A formal review of the specified zoning changes and a related evaluation of
the Comprehensive Plan is somewhat difficult to pinpoint in terms of time and
expenses. My basic fear is that we will have to back up the existing or
modified Comprehensive Plan with a detailed technical review of each site.
While there is an economy of scale involved, this open endedness is trouble-
some. In any case, my suggestion is to establish a maximum budget of $5,000.
Our work would, however, be conducted on a time and materials basis. Should
we complete the effort in less time, the City will be billed accordingly.
If our work and costs exceed the budget maximum, the City will, however, be
liable for the budget limit. This assumes no unexpected major complications
and resulting budget modification requests.
Any Comprehensive Plan review and update would include a general relook at the
entire plan. It is expected that the major focus will, however, concentrate
on the Highway 10 corridor. We would publish the adopted plan changes ir, an
addendum booklet format to be utilized in conjunction with the base Compre-
hensive Plan. Thirty copies of the addendum booklet would be supplied as
part of the budget maximum.
Also for the purpose of documentation, Northwest will provide the City with
technical review of the proposed Holiday Station development. This review
will be based upon specific site analysis plus Comprehensive Plan and Zoning
Ordinance standards. Work will be completed on a time and materials basis
for a maximum foe of $1,000.00. This assumes a limitation of not more than
one public presentation of our evaluation, findings and recommendations.
"(F�f(d` .,r,1�/'J RrZ✓.�,Ny) I,vDd 09Y
Ooi S r0 <i l,' VLIi �'
4820 minnehmka boulevard, suite420 minneapolis, mn 55416 612/925.9420
Mr. Steven Thatcher
July 9, 1984
Page Two
I believe this responds to all the matters we have discussed. Please contact
me should you have questions.
Very truly yours, /I,
NORTHWEST
j ASSOCIATED CO FTI
ICP e
.- D&Od-Rcht�A
President
ORL/nd
4t"' 9
�.• MEMO TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: CLERK-ADMINISTRA
DATE: JULY 10, 1984
SUBJECT: SUNSET ROAD MEDIAN CLOSURE
Attached is a letter received by the City from J. S. Katz,
District Traffic Engineer for the Minnesota Department of
Transportation, District Five indicating that it is the
intention of the Department of Transportation to close the
Highway 10 median at Sunset Road in Spring Lakc Park on or
about the second week, of August. As you may recall, the City
of Spring Lake Park had been requesting that the City of Mounds
View jointly participate with them in the installation of a
signalized intersection on Pleasant View Drive which would
allow for the rerouting of Sunset Road traffic to Pleasant
View Drive thus allowing for the median closure without
negatively impacting upon traffic circulation at Sunset
Road.
The last meeting with Spring Lake Park resulted in a request
by the City of Mounds View that they determine the level at
which they would be willing to financially participate in the
access of right-of-way and construction of the intersection.
My last conversation with Clerk -Treasurer, Don Busch was that
the City of Spring Lake Park vas negotiating with Nagela Sign
Company to determine what the cost would be to acquire those
areas in which their advertising signs are located. Since
that conversation I have had no contacts with Mr. Busch
regarding this matter.
Staff would request Council direction as to your desires in
this matter. As we see it, there are two options facing the
Mounds View City Council. They are:
1. Ignore this matter and allow the City of Spring
Lake Park to contact Mounds View should it be
their desire to resurrect this issue for further
discussion.
2. City of Mounds View contact Spring Lake Park and
determine what the desires of that City are.
ko/
Minnesota
((
Department of Transportation
District Pive
5801 Duluth Street OF I Golden valley, Minnesota 55422
J 8 9101111
July 3, 1984 �h�Q J�is
t
Jeff Nelson, City Administrator
City of Moundsview
2410 Highway 10 �dR
Moundsview, HN 55112 ll�bZ�
Re: C.S. 0203 (T.H. 10)
Median closure at Sunset Road
Dear Mr, Nelson:
(612) 5453761
Since 1977, the intersection of T.H. 10 and Sunset Road has met warrants
for signal installation. Discussions with Moundsview and Spring Lake
Park began in January 1979 to consider signal alternatives. Through
December 1981, we have submitted several layouts for review and approval
to the cities and Anoka and Ramsey counties. We have attended council
meetings and had discussions with each city separately and in joint
meetings.
Although there was apparent agreement on a layout, project cost sharing
and right-of-way acquisition was never agreed to. More than once during
project development, Mn/DOT had made its intention to drop the signal
project and take other corrective action.
The Sunset Road intersection continues to be an accident problem and the
latest priority ranking for our district shows it to be near the top of
the list. Since there has bern no progress in reaching an agreement, we
believe that we can no longer wait to take action. We have, therefore,
scheduled to close the T.H. 10 median at Sunset Road ca or about the
second week of August.
We have also informed the City of Spring Lake Park of our intention.
Although we have dropped the project, we would be willing to consider
installing a signal at Pleasantview Drive at some future date providing
that the intersection still meets signal warrants at the time and a
tentative agreement is reached by all agencies.
Sincerely,
J. S. Katz, P.
District Traffi&,Znngineer
JSK:pn
cc: Paul Ruud, Anoka County
Kenneth Weltzine, Ramsey County
7
J
An E•gwd Oppmlunhy Employer
y0., u.
MEMO TO: Clerk -Administrator 6 City Council
FROM: Director of Public Works/Community Development
DATE: May 16, 1984
SUBJECT: Prohibition of Nighttime Parking on City Streets
Enclosed please find a recommendation from the Planning
Commission regarding the prohibition of nighttime parking on City
streets. The Planning Commission has coordinated the writing of
this resolution with the Police department.
I have no recommendation on this subject. However, I believe
prohibiting parking at night on a trial basis is worth while.
SWT/mb
TO: Mayor, City Council, and Clerk -Administrator
FROM: Police Chief
DATE: June 28, 1984
RE: PROHIBITION OF NIGHTIME PARKING ON CITY STREETS
I have reviewed Planning Commission Resolution N 105-84 regarding
the prohibition of nightime parking on City streets.
I am in tutal agreement with the resolution and suggest to the
City Council to consider drafting an ordinance prohibiting nightime
parking (between 2:00 AM and 6:00 AN) on City streets.
MOUNDS VIEW PLANNI14G COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. 105-84
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL REGARDING THE
PROHIBITION OF NIGHT TIME PARKING ON CITY STREETS
WHEREAS, cars parking on streets at night have caused
problems with snow plowing, as targets for drunk drivers, and
easier targets for vandalif.n; and
WHEREAS, it is not uncommon in other cities in the
Metropolitan Area to have night time parking prohibition on City
streets; and
WHEREAS, the Mounds View Zoning Code has requirements for
all zoning uses to provide adequate off-street parking; and
WHEREAS, the hours of prohibition for night time parking
usually fall within the hours of 2:00 a.m. to 6:00 a.m.; and
WHEREAS, such a prohibition on parking may initially be a
hardship; and
WHEREAS, the prohibition could start with a one year
probationary period in which hardship permits could be issued for
just cause; and
WHEREAS, the program could be reviewed at the end of the
one year period for voluntary compliance and rezoning to evaluate
just cause for hardship;
NOW, THEREFORE., BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View
Planning Commission recommends to the City council the
establishment of a moritorium regarding parking on City streets
between the hours of 2:00 a.m. and 6:00 a.m.;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission
recommend the following guidelines be used in the implementation
of the prohibition of off-street parking;
1. Minimum public notice of four months before program
starts.
2. One year trial period to be used for evaluation
purposes.
3. Permits for hardship be granted for just cause. Just
cause to be established as a permanent definition at
the end of the one year period.
"RESOLUTION NO. 105-83
PAGE TWO OF TWO
4. That Chapter 81 of the Mounds View Municipal Code be
amended accordingly to facilitate the recommendations
in this resolution.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this recommendation come from
the Mounds View Planning Commission in order to create a better
and safer transportation system for the City of Mounds View as a
whole.
ATTEST:
(SEAL)
Adopted this 2nd day of May, 1984.
Chairman
Director of Public Works/
Community Development
J.
APPROVED APPROVED: July 9, 1984
PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA
Regular Meeting
June 25, 1984
Mounds View City Hall
2401 Hwy. 10, Mounds View, MN 55112
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The Mounds View City Council was called to order by 1. Call to Order
Mayor McCarty at 7:30 PM on June 25, 1984.
The Pledge of Allegiance was said.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Councilmembers Hankner, Blanchard,
Links and MayoF McCarty.
It was noted that Councilmember Doty was expected to
arrive later in the meeting.
ALSO PRESENT: City Attorney Meyers, Clerk/Admini-
strator Pauley and Public Works/Community Development
Director Thatcher.
Motion/Second: Linke/Blanchard to approve the
June-17TW minutes as corrected.
3 ayes 0 nays 1 abstention
2. Pledge of
Allegiance
3. Roll Call
4. Approval of
Minutes:
June 11, 1984
Motion Carried
Councilmember Hankner abstained from the vote as she
had been on vacation at the time of the June 11 meeting.
There were no residents requests or comments from the 5. Residents Re -
floor, quests and
Comments from
the Floor
Motion/Second: Linke/Blanchard to approve the con- 6. Approval of
sent agenda as presented and waive the reading of Consent Agenda
the resolutions.
4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Mayor McCarty explained that he met with the Clerk- 7. Consideration of
Administrator and Mr. Jim Loosen, owner of Loose -Ends Renewal of Loose
On 10, and Mr. Loosen would like his license renewed. Ends on 10 On
Mr. Loosen will be taking under consideration the Sale Liquor
requirements for Sunday food service in conjunction License A lct.
with liquor sales and will soon decide whether Loose PP
Ends will close on Sunday or come into compliance with
Sunday liquor sales regulations.
Mounds View City Council June 25, 1984
Regular Meeting Page Two
--------------------- ------------------- - ---------- -----------------
/"� Motion/Second: McCarty/Hankner to approve the .
renewal ot the liquor license for Loose Ends on 10.
4 ayes 0 nays
Motion Carried
Director Thatcher reported the Planning Commission 8.
Report of
will be holding special informational meetings,
Director of
on July 11 at 7 PM and July 18 at 7:30 PM, regarding
Public Works/
the rezonings that have been tabled. He added that
Community Dvlpt.
the Planning Commission would like to have a joint
meeting with the Council to discuss the Comprehensive
Plan.
Mayor McCarty recommended these meetings be coordi-
nated with Attorney Meyers.
Director Thatcher informed the Council the Planning
Commission would like to hire Dave Licht to do a
comprehensive analysis of the rezonings, and they
would like to have him at one or both meetings in
July, along with Attorney Meyers.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley stated Director Thatcher
and the Planning Commission'have been requested to state
exactly
what they would like Mr. Licht to do, and then
submit it to him for his estimate. He recommended
the Council hold off giving approval until the
proposal is received from Mr. Licht. He stated
they would still have time to approve it at the
July 9 meeting.
The Council agreed to meet with the Planning
Commission on July 30 at 6:30 PM.
Director Thatcher requested the Council set an
improvement hearing for Pinecrest Properties for
8:35 PM on July 9. He stated the improvements have
been petitioned for by 100% of the property owners.
Motion/Second: McCarty/Blanchard to set an improve-
ment hearing for Pinecrest Properties for July 9,
1984 at 8:35 PM.
4 ayes 0 nays
Motion Carried
Councilmember Blanchard stated she had received two
calls asking why the street sweeper did not have
flashing lights.
Director Thatcher replied the street sweeper is hired
out in the Spring, and has not been in the City
-- ' recently.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley suggested getting the
license number of the vehicle in question, so it
Mounds View City Council June 25, 1984
Regular Meeting Page Three
--------------------------------------------------------------------
could be traced.
Mayor McCarty closed the regular meeting and opened
the first public hearing at 7:45 PM.
There was no one present to address the proposed
rezoning, so Mayor McCarty closed the public hearing
and reopened the regular meeting at 7:45 PM.
Motion/Second: Linke/Hankner to approve the first
reading Ordinance No. 374, amending the Municipal
Code of Mounds View by amending Chapter 41 entitled
"Specific Rezonings", and waive the reading.
4 ayes 0 nays
Attorney Meyers reported Mr. Merritt would like to
meet with the Council at their next agenda session
9A. Public Hearing -
7801 Silver
Lake Road - Rezo
from R2 to B2
Motion Carried
10. Report of
Attorney
Councilmember Hankner reported she had received some 11. Reports of
calls complaining of noise Thursday evening in the Councilmembers
Jackson/Bronson area.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley recommended checking with
Police Chief Ramacher to see if there had been a lot
of complaints for this area.
Councilmember Blanchard questioned how the maintenance
inventory is coming along.
Director Thatcher replied it is very close to being
completed, and should be ready soon.
Councilmember Linke asked that Staff send a letter
of thanks to the president of the Jaycees, the Lions,
and Tony Jambor, for the get-together for the wagon
trail for Camp Courage, for the Lions Club.
Mayor McCarty had no report.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley passed out copies of 12. Report of
proposed Resolution No. 1761. Clerk/Admini-
strator
Motion/Second: Linke/Hankner to approve Resolution
o�1761, approving the 1984 labor agreement between
the City of Mounds View and Teamsters Local 320,
and waive the reading.
4 ayes 0 nays
Motion Carried
Mounds View City Council June 25, 1984
Regular Meeting Page Four
---------------------------------------------------------- ------
Councilmember Doty arrived at 7:53 PM.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported Burger King
will be opening in the next few weeks, and they
will be at the July 9 meeting, for their occupancy
permit.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported the restaurant
license for Perkins had not been approved yet, due
to a mix-up with the Perkins staff in not issuing
a check. He reported it is supposed to be in
the mail, and asked the Council to approve it
contingent upon the fee being received.
Motion/Second: Hankner/Doty to approve the
restaurant license for Perkins, contingent upon
the fee being received at City Hall by the end of
the business day on June 29, 1984.
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported he will be on
vacation July 4 through July 8.
Mayor McCarty closed the regular meeting and opened
9B. Public Hearing -
the second public hearing at 8:12 PM.
Rezoning of. 7373
Knollwood Drive
Janet Reinecke, 7373 Knollwood Drive, read a letter
from R2 to R1
from her husband, who was unable to attend the meet-
ing, opposing the rezoning of their property.
Roger Morgan, 7395 Knollwood Drive, stated he
concurred with the statements in Mr. Reinecke's
letter, and would like to see the property remain R2.
Mayor McCarty closed the public hearing and reopened
the regular meeting at 8:15 PM.
Motion/Second: Doty/Blanchard to deny the rezoning .
o the property at 7373 Knollwood Drive, and have the
property remain R2, as it was purchased that way, and
charges were paid for sewer as R2, and the neighbors
support it as R2.
5 ayes 0 nays
Motion Carried
Planning Commissioner Miller explained that at the
time the Planning Commission reviewed this piece of
property, the background info_-mation was not available
to them.
Attorney Meyers advised the Comprehensive Plan be brought
into conformance to reflect this denial.
Motrnd s View City Council June 25, 1984
Regular Meeting Page Five
---------------------------------------------------
roll Councilmember Blanchard stated the property had been
R2 for as long as she could remember.
Mayor McCarty closed the zegular meeting and opened 9C. Public Hearing -
the next public ).;eating at 8:18 PM. Rezoning of
There was no one present to address the rezoning, so H25from uR3ytooad R2
Mayor McCarty closed the public hearing and reopened
the regular meeting at 8:18 PM,
Motion/Second: Dotty/Linke to have the first reading
o r nance o: 376, amending the Municipal Code of
Mounds View by amending Chapter 41 entitled "Specific
Rezonings", and waive the reading.
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Mayor McCarty closed the regular meeting and opened 9D, Public Hearing -
the next public hearing at 8:30 PM. Rezoning of
95/
There was no one present to address the rezoning, 97 Sun7 to a Rd.
so Mayor McCarty closed the public hearing and 97 Sunnyside Rd.
p g from R1 to R2
reopened the regular meeting at 8:30 PM.
Motion./Second: Linke/Hankner to approve the first
tea ing o Ordinance No. 377 amending the Municipal
Code of Mounds View by amending Chapter 41 entitled
"Specific Rezonings" and waive the reading of the
resolution.
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Mayor McCarty announced that, due to an error in the 9E. Rezoning of 7544
advertisement of the hearing, it would have to be Silver Lake Road
rescheduled. from R1 to R2
Motion/Second: Doty/Hankner to cancel the public
eating or 7544 Silver Lake Road and readvertise,
and direct Staff to schedule the public hearing for
the first open time at. the July 23 meeting.
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Counrilmember Doty briefed the Council ou the League
Of Cities meeting he and Clerk/Administrator Pauley
attended in Duluth June 13-15.
Motion/Second: Doty/Hankner to adjourn the meeting 13. Adjournment
at S7rM.
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Mounas View City Council June 25, 1984
Regular Meeting Page Six
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Respec�fully submitted,
(I /TJ
F.
Clerk/