Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packets - 1984/10/01CITY COUNCIL NESTING 04 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW October 8, 1984 7:30 p.m. A G E N D A 1, 6:30 P.M. Special Meeting: Discussion with Planning Commission Regarding Recommendation on Holiday Station Proposal 2. 7:30 p.m. Call to Order - Regular Meeting 3. Pledge of Allegiance 4. Roll Call - Hankner, Blanchard, Doty, Linke, McCarty 5. Approval of Minutes: September 24, 1984 - Regular Mtg. October 1, 1984 - Special Meeting 6. Public Hearing: 7:45 p.m. 6940 Silver Lake Road Property Owner, Edward Werdien, Is Requesting A Conditional Use Permit To Construct a 24 Ft. x 24 Ft. Utility Bldg. 7. Residents Requests and Comments From The Floor ------------------------------------------------------- CITIZENS: BEFORE SPEAKING PLEASE GIVE YOUR FULL NAM', AND ADDRESS FOR THE MINUTES -------------------------------------------------------- 8. Approval of the Consent Agenda ITEM A. Set Meeting of Canvassing Board for 5:00 p.m. on November 7, 1984 ITEM B. Reschedule November 12, 1984 Regular Council Meeting to 7:30 p.m. on November 13, 1984 ITEM C. Adopt Resolution No.1816 Appointing Judges for November 6, 1984 General Election ITEM D. Set Public Hearing for Kinder Care Application for Industrial Development Revenue Bond Financing for 7:40 p.m, on October 22, 1984 ITEM E. Set Public Hearing for 1984 Long Term Financial Plan for 7:50 p.m. on October 22, 1984. COOTBECOliElt 8, 1984 PAGE TWO ITEM F. Adopt Resolution No. 1811 Accepting $87,500 LAWCON/LCMR Grant for Development of Greenfield Park and Identifying Matching Fund Sources ITEM G. Adopt Resolution No. 1812 Requesting Action to Ensure Proper Operation of. the Public Employees Retirement Association ITEM H. Adopt Resolution No. 1804 Establishing A Policy Regarding Monies Received From the Minnesota State Aid Construction Fund for Engineering Services ITEM I. Authorize Finance Director to Advertise and Interview Applicants for Part Time Accounting Clerk Position ITEM J. Adopt Resolution No.1815 Supporting the City of Roseville's Proposal for a Regional Speed Skating Facility ITEM K. Approve Six Month Performance Review of Steve Thatcher and Adopt Resolution No. 1817 1 Approving The Appointment of Steve Thatcher As a Full Time City Employee ITEM L. Approve Resolution NO. 1814 Approving Just and Correct Claims Against City Funds ITEM M. Licenses for Approval General - Expire 6/30/85 Benson-Orth Associates, Inc. - New C.O. Field Co., Inc. - Renewal Kallstrom Builders - New Preferred Builders, Inc. - Renewal Real Estate Diversified, Inc. - New Spancrete Midwest Company - New Heater and Air Conditioning - Expire 6/30/85 Anderson Mechanical - Renewal Riccar Heating and Air Conditioning - Renewal Masonry - Expires 6/30/85 C. B. Construction - New Kiffineyer, Inc. - New Excavation - Expires 6/30/85 J. R. Walker and Sons, Inc. - New Other - Expires 6/30/85 Dolphin Pool and Patio (Pool Installation) -New Hayes Contractors, Inc. (Sprinkler Inst.) -New AGENDA PAGE THREE OCTOBER 8, 1984 ITEM M. Licenses for Approval (continued) Gamblino Device - Expires 10/23/84 Mounds View Lion'sNew 9. Consideration of Planning Commission Recommendation on Holiday Station Stores, Inc. Development Proposal for 2800 Highway 10 10. First Reading of Ordinance No.383 Amending Ordinance No.195 Establishing Salaries for the Mayor and City Council 11. Consideration of Staff Memorandum and Adoption of Resolution Approving the City's Self Evaluation, Transition Plan, and Grievance Policy Pursuant To Revenue Sharing Handicapped Discrimination Requirements i 12. Report of Director of Public Works/Community Development 13. Report of Attorney 14, Report of Councilmembers - Hankner, Blanchard, Doty, Linke and McCarty 15. Report of Administrator 16. Adjournment r� .... ,.. If-.., PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA September 24, 1984 Regular Meeting Mounds View City Hall 2401 Hwy. 10, Mounds View, MN 55112 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Mounds View City Council was called to order by Mayor McCarty at 7:30 PM on September 24, 1984, The Pledge of Allegiance was said. MEMBERS PRESENT: Councilmembers Linke, Hankner, Blanchard, Doty and Mayor McCarty. ALSO PRESENT:City Attorney Meyers, Finance Director Brageand Public Works/Community Development Director Thatcher. Motion/Second: Doty/Hankner to approve the August m nutes as corrected. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion/Second: Linke/Hankner to approve the September m nutes as presented. 5 ayes 0 nays Russell Warren, 8044 Greenwood Drive, stated that on September 20, the local DFL had sent a letter to Police Chief Ramacher, with carbon copies sent to the Council and Mayor, and Gary Quick and Clerk/ Administrator Pauley, regarding an election billboard sign for Duane McCarty at Highway 10 and Edgewood, which violates the election sign statu%tes. He noted that Mr. Quick had been advised by Mayor McCarty that a sign he had put up earlier had to be taken down as it was also in violation, and asked when Mayor McCarty's sign would be removed. Attorney Meyers reviewed Ordinance No. 39, covering e election signs. He explained that a violation would be a criminal offense under the code, and enforcement would be the issuance of complaints by the proper officials, and then the case may proceed to court. 1. Call to Order 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Roll Call 4. Approval of Minutes: August 27, 1984 Sept. 10, 1984 Motion Carried Motion Carried 5. Residents Requests and Comments from the Floor �f ^ " ji`B Mounds View City Council i'" f e lw„ .1904 Regular Meeting ��� 0 , ` P ----------------------------------------------------------- S Mayor McCarty explained he had received a complaint about Mr. Quick putting his signs up too early, and had passed that along to Mr. Quick. He also stated he had not been formally cited at this time, and if he is, he will hand the citation to Naegle, the owner of the billboard in question. Attorney Meyers advised that the letter that was received could not be considered a formal complaint, and the billboard company should be advised it is in violation of the ordinance. Motion/Second: Hankner/Linke to notify Naegle that the sign at Highway 10 and Edgewood is in violation of the City Ordinance. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Mayor McCarty stated he would like a formal opinion from Attorney Meyers that this is a vio- lation, and he wants a clear definition in the ordinance of the difference between billboard signs and electioneering signs. Attorney Meyers advised that he feels the sign in question is a violation of the ordinance. Dennis Petrini asked Councilmember Hankner whether she had written circulated a petition regarding the ILS at the airport. Councilmember Hankner replied she had not. Mr. asked Councilmember Linke if he circulated a pet Councilmember Linke veinnheered stated that he not been out campaigning an -this -issue at all. Mr. Petrini read a prepared statement, giving his personal feelings on the position he feels certain Councilmembers had taken on the airport issue. Councilmember Hankner explained to Mr. Petrini that she has stated it many times before, and will say it again, that she does not want an intermediate airport and has been an advocate; for a minor use airport. She also pointed out that Mr. Petrini was nowhere around during the 1983 Legislative session when the issued was discussed at length, nor had he been present at the many Council meetings where it has been discussed until March or April of this year. Councilmember Hankner explained to Mr. Petrini what she feels the process has been to date on the airport. She stated that while she does not want the Master Plan, there are some items in it that are saleable. 1 U N A V E D Mounds View City Council. September. 24, 1984 fh Regular Meeting -------Page-Three ---------------------------------- -------------- Councilmember Linke clarified his position for Mr. Petrini on the airport issue, to correct Mr. Petrini's mistaken comments on Councilmember Linke's stand. Mayor McCarty stated the City has an estimate of a approximately $100,000 to fund their lawsuit, and it is his personal feeling that it could be paid for without any additional taxes, and could be taken from def4eeenee defeaseance, tie stated he feels it would be a good investment, and they must decide what the limit is to be. Councilmember Doty stated there is $180,000 in the contingency fund that he feels could be used to cover the costs. Councilmember Hankner explained the process she feels the City has gone through in the past year and she also stated how important; it is to not reveal all the strategy they have planned, as it could be used against them in court, with MAC having an advantage of knowing what the City had planned. Due to the heated comments and accusations being made, a recess was taken. Upon calling hack to order, Attorney Meyers reveiwed the history of the airport situation and stated that several questionnaires have been received back that will be used to prepare affidavits toward injunctions, as a basis for obtaining restraining orders as well as notifying the FAA and Congressmen that the City has specific concerns and questions. 1 Motion/Second: McCarty/Doty that the Council be en record as standing opposed to the current Master Plan Eor the Anoka County Airport, reserving runway place- ment and configurations for future consideration. 2 ayes 2 nay 1 abstention Motion Failed Councilmember Blanchard stated she refused to vote on the motion as she feels it has become a totally political issue at City Hall and she has stated her views on the airport innumerable times before. Councilmember Linke stated he was not opposed to the movement of the north/south runway to the north, as they already have people with irrepairable damage from where it is presently located, and leaving it where it is will cause them nothing but further harm. Mayor McCarty stated his intent is to oppose the current Master Plan but still hold true to the belief that the reaway be moved north. Councilmember Hankner stated she agrees with Council - member Linke, and that in passing this Mounds View City Council September 24, 1984 Regular Meeting U Page Four ------------------------------------------------------------------- type of motion, would not allow the flexibility to proceed with the lawsuit. She also pointed out the Council is unified in proceeding with the lawsuit, but the Councilmembers have different beliefs on how to proceed. She added that she would personally favor a motion to proceed with the lawsuit. Councilmember Doty stated he is opposed to the current Master Plan, and he agrees with the importance of moving the runway. Councilmember Doty stated he demanded that Council - member Blanchard vote. Councilmember Blanchard cast her vote as present. ounc mom er inke stated he would uphold Councilmember Blanchard's abstention as he feels it should be up to each Councilmember to vote their consience. Attorney Meyers reviewed the ordinance and advised it would require a mandatory injunction to make a Councilmember vote. Alice Fritz, 8072 Long Lake Road, asked why the ordinance regarding no alcohol consumption in the City parks was not being enforced. She also stated she had heard the Park and Rec Commission and Festivities Commission were planning a beer garden for the next Festival in the Park. Mark Mack, 4068 Glenhaven, stated that he was a member of the Festivities Commission and they had taken no action or. it yet but were considering it due to budget problems. Mayor McCarty directed Staff to send a letter to all organizations using the City parks, citing the ordinance. Paul R.itelle, 3989 Central Avenue ME, Minneapolis, stated he was the attorney for Greg Johnson, and asked the Council if they would consider reaching a pretrial settlement, before the scheduled court date of October 8. He explained he and his client feel they have an excellent chance to win in court, but want to avoid incurring futher costs and the anger of the neighborhood over the use of the property. He stated Mr. Johnson was willing to agree to not sell his property to anyone who would intend to rezone for commercial purposes, and the sold use would be the continued operation on a limited basis of the Highway 10 Radiator Shop, and they would erect a fence to separate them from the residential property owners. He added that Mr. Johnson would also agree to continuing his operation on a conditional basis, under a CUP. Mounds View City Council 5 ty j September 24, 1.984 Regular Meeting U f�ii o ddr+ .4 Yam. Page Five --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mayor McCarty stated he feels the basic question goes back to the Planning Commission recommendation, which was from what the Council acted. He added that the Council would take the request under advisement. Carol Welte, Darrell -Welker 8045 Groveland, questioned what the property was when Mr. Johnson purchased it, Mayor McCarty replied it was single family residential. Motion/Second: McCarty/Doty to take the presenta- tion to the Council on the Highway 10 Radiator Shop under advisement and notify the proper staff members. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Russell Paul, 7940 Greenfield Avenue, asked when the ordinance went into effect for the signs and billboards. Attorney Meyers replied he did not have the exact date with him, but it was several years ago. Motion/Second: Linke/Hankner to approve the 6. Approval of consent agenda as presented and waive the reading Consent Agenda of the resolutions. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Mayor McCarty closed the regular meeting and opened 7. Public Hearing: the public hearing at 8:50 PM. Delinquent Utility Accounts Finance Director Brager explained the process used in determing these accounts as delinquent and levying the tax. Mayor McCarty closed the pubic hearing and reopened the regular meeting at 8:52 1•1. Motion/Second: Doty/Hankner tv approve Resolution o. an waive the reading. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Bill Fritz stated the budget looks good to him, and 8. Public Discussion asked some questions regarding the contingency fund of 1985 Budgets and interest earned, Mayor McCarty and the Council explained the process used in preparing the budget. Mounds View City Hall l September 24, 1984 Regular Meeting ; 1` Page Six ------------------------------------ /- Motion/Second Linke/Hankner to approve Resolution 9. Consideratic r too, an waive the reading. of Resolution No. 1796 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Motion/Second: Blanchard/Doty to approve Resolution 10, Consideration o. an waive the reading. of Resolution No. 1797 No vote was taken on the above motion, a, the following amendment was made. Motion/Second: McCarty/Hankner to amend the precious motion, to approve Resolution No. 1797, minis the capital expenditures contained in the 1985 long term financial plan. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Motion/Second: Doty/Linke to approve Resolution No. 11. Consideration an wa ve the reading. of Resolution No. 1794 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carr Motion/Second: Doty/Hankner to approve Resolution 12. Consideration o. 1795 and waive the reading. of Resolution No. 1795 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Motion/Second: McCarty/Hankner to table Resolutions 13. Consideration go—.77n­and 1793. of Resolutions No, 1792 and 5 ayes 0 nays 1793 Motion Carried Park Director Anderson reviewed the proposed budget 14. Consideration for the aquatics director for 1984-85. of Aquatics Director 1984-85 Councilmember Linke expressed concern over the Contract percentage proposed for the aquatic director versus other city employees for a salary increase, as well as a reduction in hours. Park Director Anderson explained it was an 11% increase, and clarified the hour reduction. Mayor McCarty pointed out she has nearly department head status responsibility and this was a new program and she had been at a low salary. Mounds View City Council Lj` W/ th J L y Lj September 24, 1984 Regular Meeting Page Seven -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Motion/Second: McCarty/Doty to approve the memo - ran um of understanding between Mounds View and Maureen Thelen for the duties of parttime aquatics director, as presented September 24, 1984 with the deletion of #7 on page 3 of the contract, and authorize the Clerk/Administrator and Mayor to execute the contract. 5 ayes 0 nays Al Perez presented his proposal to the Council to be an airport noise control consultant. Attorney Meyers advised residents have volunteered their yards for measuring sound levels. Mr. Perez stated he would be willing to include the monitoring in the $7,000 bid. Motion/Second: Doty/Blanchard to approve the pro- posedcontract from Northern Sound at the rate of $40/hour,.not to exceed $7,000, with the budgeted amount identified from the contingency. 5 ayes 0 nays The Council asked that Mr. Perez work with Attorney Meyers in coordinating efforts. Motion/Second: McCarty/Doty to remove from the tab.e Resolution No. 1789. 5 ayes 0 nays Director Thatcher had no report. Councilmember Linke reported he had attended a Ramsey County League meeting, regarding the Governor's council on tax problems. Councilmember Hankner had no report. Councilmember Blanchard had no report, Councilmember Doty reported he had received the book from the Rice Creek Watershed District on the water resources management plan. Mayor McCarty had no report. Motion Carried 15. Consideration of Resolution No. 1800 Motion Carried Motion Carried 16. Report of Public Works/ Community Dvlpt. Director 17. Reports of Councilmembers Mounds View City Council may:iptember 24, 1984 Regular Meeting LPage Eight --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Motion/Second: McCarty/Doty to approve Resolution 15A. Consideration of � No. 1789 and waive the reading. Resolution No. 1. 5 ayes 0 nays Attorney Meyers had no report. Finance Director Brager reported there were two copies of the tax study commission report at City Hall, and will be in the library for anyone who would like to review them. Mayor McCarty stated the Council had voted 5-0 in recommending Resolution No. 1125, on March 28, 1984 where they all took a stand on the ILS, and asked for Councilmember Blanchard's vote now. Councilmember Blanchard replied she had not changed her mind. There was further discussion on the airport issue, with the Council and Attorney Meyers answering questions from the residents present. Russell Pahl accused Councilmember Linke of favoring an intermediate airport. Councilmember Linke restated his position of opposition to the upgrading of the Anoka County -Blaine Airport to anything but a minor status. Motion/Second: Doty/Hankner to adjourn the meeting at 9:51 PM. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried 17. Report of Attorney 18. Reoort of Clerk - Administrator 19. Adjournment Motion Carried Respectfully submitted, Donald Brager Acting Administrator �I 1 (9 PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA Special Meeting October 1, 1984 Mounds View City Hall 2401 Hwy. 10, Mounds View MN 55112 ------------------------------------------------------------ The meeting was called to order by 1. Call to Order Mayor McCarty at 9:50 p.m. Motion/Second: Doty moved, Linke seconded to adopt Resolution 1810 Authorizing Submission of the Community Energy Council Grant Application and waived the reading. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Mayor McCarty asked the Council for their direction regarding Resolution No. 1797 which was adopted by the City Council at the September 24, 1984 Regular Meeting approving the 1985 General Fund Budget. His concern was with respect to the provision in the City Council portion of the 1985 General Fund Budget for increases in the City Council's salaries which could not be implemented in 1984 as the ordinance which would be required to be adopted increasing the City Council's salaries could not be adopted prior to the November 6th election. McCarty asked if the City Council wanted to reallocate the money budgeted for Council raises to some other purpose or to the Contingency Fund. Councilmember Hankner stated that she felt that the Resolution should stand as adopted. Councilmember Linke stated his general agreement with this position and suggested that the Resolution stand. Councilmember Doty moved to adjourn at 10:00 p.m. Seconded by Councilmember Linke. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Respectfully submitted, Donald F. Pauley Clerk -Administrator. 00' CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Mounds View City Council will meet on Monday, October 8, 1984 at 7:45 p.m. at Mounds View City Hall, 2401 Highway 10, Mounds View, Minnesota, 55112, to consider the conditional use permit request for an oversized accessory building (216 square feet allowed, 576 square feet requested) for the property located at 6940 Silver Lake Road, legally known as: Knollwood Park, N 1/2 of Lot ill and ex S 185 feet of Lot 110 Anyone desiring to be heard with reference to this matter may be heard at this meeting. (Bulletin: September 26, 1984) Donald F. Paulny Clerk -Administrator .- . ✓✓h.C,1.L .�( �1 �' �ac.�9-mot` �i �� 28yn Lt�QCrEC.ted �iC e {�"-� iCcy.� s e-tom , r✓U� s 5 V 3 L �n.�1c-c� � • �c�Eu,.�cc. L' ' 9 d 0 0 C(eL e - t, ;f/y C���L � /Ce-ece—e ,A=� W. I 71 1^ -9 "4z � ,nCu�cl�' � j. �' L�/,�-fit; .�. •�L'J'�"� So%g tGB�?ryv'ft'cJ pl.uuC� 07 t2�cx �ti 44. .5-091 Sons dGe� <^ eJ l�zL��• 44w9f LLtiL (�• / h ;. 1'��! .. SOS j �p�h.c1 vLC w �`•''���-f .- r r Soy _,a-c-C'�cc %)"� x,1,ac�2. L!� . �ac7i,�i✓mot SO 1t0 -- 4ta G'! o %�2 il.�,GLce s u�%f_ /2d aG� s (9 (9 atu I:T DRIVE I °Ll- 0 I a ( 1 .1 +Jt ig ,2 1 I II I -� r I 1 • 71 30 • 1 f l I o 9 IO •4 —�'S'W 3 Is �n .o• 0 1 0 • I Ju.r of �wr 7 oA..t !� 23 -1JAL _141..4 w. •••, F 9- 92 '...93 I 94 95 96 a w • I a 1S Cl • ,17 . °f 1 lA of x ° 6 !/� 001 l.msI alL 29 Jfl_Ujjf ca Ob°c 16 75 6 6 10 IN: — —�. '1 N LS u9� \` " � I I 97 \�' 2 , o. � Y J/2.J • 26 6 o°_ 114.21 . ]2 101 00 I 99 q 96 Q0 ° I I "+�7 -Fnslti M I ' e 3 I 7 14 's Ij 1 25 ^ ! s: LLL-- _ 1i.QLf A° [ PAP KZ 24 ti• Jt. A e 3 131 3 WOODCRDST 0 F 2 ! '2 20 I •�II '" f 22IOo Ioe loo 3 1C JlI.1L__ 21 a 0 4 o D� I ID n 13 1 iJ WOODCRE T -- 103 I I04 I IOS I 106 107 O .1Q8,•1.109 • ) ,1 a .0T143 A J 0+7. 1 vet,. .0 J 1 • �, a+'• n :J ) _ 16 I ' wl is LST5 2 •�I'S2 ^ IS 20 °`11+.! .'J3 ±]� : " 1�'sn! ,li I li.Y__{_ 3411 � — �in�4 3 .4 t�03 . '1 3 0 17, o Itso• ,.;13y}Q.l I'491 .i ! • �L+ d1 �11.1:__.1 Ill of 1•.11 100.1. 1^..11 I 1 �`` f 1 t I�' T •h I`T _ 3 4 �3 4 j 13 4 1LLI 13 4 0 .V OCC0" -i-- • J • !.,.,1 • .'A lr, .5 •I�I 2 5 12 5 :r ,J�� 122 1 r • 1 5 �• 14 1 qq .. ;Il .q:, '..'. .. :1 ).i' 'f!.?f —i W.-.1.1.:! , N:9 �!3. .89 1)�• v, u4• )-i.) Z�j.161.. I• �) 113 ^7 n2 .1;L1.:.. -110: ; 1: e n 6 Q i 1 �> '• ^ ly �,I•)i.n." 04.11..i 0 Ji Z']1 , ')t.9�'o 'Z �41>L _)-1l49--ti IN °al I I� i + 1p,p 7 I 0 ,p ': Z to ' 7 .I 1 y' :• I ,^ I_ ')).SFr g'.133i—JIO�= SS III_�J.LL�{y9 -7%"9 8�rl d49. ^) .'11 e J I!5U7 +981�I I 1 I17 to 7 I°l17 1JCOUNTY. SSP7,—ROAD z� UBUIIEAN 1 •.• M( Certificate of Survey for 7B4- i, 2 6 21 �r 41� - b y a �I .. 'a �•� Y \t O � 4 I� J _.. 9 O. v n N r N ` L. I , •r � 1 #re Pave,>a„���:I;L. 1c:11 '_ I;.., MCI+.'. -'' ^_ 1 h.nhy 0011dy that thin i1 a Irr..d tatregt top"".latiatt AI A ulrrq a1 ING ►.rnLrleg of the AhA19 di.grlhd land, and d 1M legation at All h11dd.46, thvun, and Ail ri)i++I..nV.nlhm.nn, 11 any, Item M an u1/ lend At rvrr.ysll ►y m. 1hn!—•/ay dt-.'A.C. Ir`O fUlUI.AN JIHOINIIMmve INC. I 1�ti�l 1npuyuOrqn .• .. �.� i. ` ' � •�_1_ MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION /^ RESOLUTION NO. 120-84 r CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF MINOR SUBDIVISION REQUEST OF EDWARD WERDIEN FOR 6940 SILVER LAKE ROAD WHEREAS, Edward Werdien has requested a minor subdivision (combining two lots into one); and WHEREAS, Mounds View Subdivision Code requires that a combination of such be approved by the Planning Commission and City Council; and WHEREAS, the combination meets all minimum requirements required by Mounds View City Code; and WHEREAS, a minor subdivision as requested requires that a surveyor's certificate be submitted; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission recommends approval of the minor subdivision request of Edward Werdien subject to submission of a surveyor's certificate meeting subdivision code requirements; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that should any irregularities show up on the surveyor's certificate that the filing of the subdivision request be denied until such time the irregularities are approved by the Planning Commission and City Council. ATTEST: (SEAL) Adopted this 5th day of September, 1984. Chairman Director of Public Works Community Development MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 121-84 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL REGARDING MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING CASE NO. 161-84 WHEREAS, Mr. and Mrs. Edward Werdien of 6940 Silver Lake Road have requested City approval for a minor subdivision (2 lots into 1) within the City of Mounds View; and WHEREAS, they are also requesting a conditional use permit for an accessory building with a size of 24' by 24' (576 square feet); and WHEREAS, Chapter 40 of the City Code states that if an accessory building is sized in excess of 216 square feet a conditional use permit must be approved; and WHEREAS, the architecture of the accessory building will be compatible to the main structure; and WHEREAS, the use of the accessory building will be for home garden equipment and utensils; and WHEREAS, there shall be no driveway to the building; and WHEREAS, the building shall meet construction codes; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission recommends approval of the conditional use permit for an accessory building provided that the following requirements are adhered to: 1) The minor subdivision must be platted and recorded as one lot. 2) Other accessory buildingsca the lot must be removed. 3) If the use of the accessory building changes, this conditional use permit is null and void. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission direct staff to forward this resolution to the City Council prior to approval of the minutes. Adopted this 5th day of September, 1984. ATTEST; Chairman i (SEAL) Director of Public Works Community Development CONSENT AGENDA oc,roii t 8, 1984 The Consent Agenda is a technique designed to expedite handling of routine and miscellaneous official business of the City Council. The entire agenda may be adopted by the Council in one motion. The motion for adoption is non -debatable and must receive unanimous approval. By request of any individual Councilmember, an item can he removed from the Consent Agenda and placed upon the Regular Agenda for debate. ITEM A. Set Meeting of Canvassing Hoard for 5:00 p.m. on November 7, 1984 ITEM H. Reschedule November 12, 1984 Regular Council Meeting to 7:30 p.m. on November 13, 1984 ITEM C. Adopt Resolution No.1816 Appointing Judges for November 6, 1984 General Election ITEM D. Sot Public Hearing :or Kinder Care Application for Industrial Development Revenue Bond Financing for 7:40 p.m. on October 22, 1984 ITEM E. Set Public Hearing for 1984 Long Term Financial Plan for 7:50 p.m. on October 22, 1984. ITEM F. Adopt Resolution No, loll .Accepting $87,500 LAWCON/LCMR Grant For Development of Greenfield Park and identifying Matching Fund Sources ITEM G. Adopt Resolution No. 1312 Requesting Action to Ensure Proper Operation of. the Public Employees Retirement Association ITEM H. Adopt Resolution No, 1.804 Establishing A Policy Regarding Monies Received From the Minnesota State Aid Construction Fund for Engineering Services ITEM I. Authorize Finance Director to Advertise and rntervie.r Applicants for Part Time Accounting Clerk Position ITEM J. Adopt Resolution No.1815 Supporting the City of Roseville's Proposal for a Regional Speed Skating Facility ITEM K. Approve Six Month Performance Review of Steve Thatcher. and Adopt Resolution No, 1817 Approving The Appointment of Steve Thatcher As a Full. Tim. City E,nployeu ITEM L. ,Approve Resolution NO. 1814 Approving Just and Correct claims AgainsL laity Funds CONSENT AGENDA PAGE TWO OCTOBER 8, 1984 VrEM M. Licenses for Approval General - Expire 6/3U/85 Benson-Orth Assoriates, Inc. - New C.(). Field Co., Inc. - Renewal Kallstrom Builders - New Preferred Builders, Inc. - Renewal Real Estate Diversified, Inc. - New spancrete Midwest Company - New Beating and Air Conditioning_-: Expire 6/30/85 Anderson .jLchaniral - Renewal Riccar Heatir;y ind Air Conditioning - Renewal Mason r - Expires 6,130/85 C. B. Construction -- New Kiffineyer, Inc.. - New Excavation - r'xLpires 6,%30/85 J. R. stalker ..nd Soisr Inc - New Other - Expires 6/3U/85 Dolphin Pool and Patio (Pool Installation) -New Hayes Contractors, Inc. (Sprinkler Inst.) -New Gamhlina Device - Exp_res JU/23/84 Mounds View Lir>n's C1ub - New u C RESOLUTION NO. 1816 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION RATIFYING THE APPOINTMENT OF ELECTION JUDGES FOR THE STATE GENERAL ELECTION WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Mounds View is required by State Law to hold a general election NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mounds View does hereby ratify the appointment of election judges made by the Mayor on Octo- ber 8th, 1984. Said appointments are attached. Adopted this 8th day of October, 1984. ATTEST: 1 Mayor (SEAL) Clerk -Administrator CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW 1984 ELECTION JUDGES PRECINCT 1 Chairperson: Janet Strauss IR Primary & General 786-2583 or 296-8845 Judges: Marilyn Brick IR Primary & General 784-4794 Marcia Pajak IR Primary & General 786-5113 Daniel Taylor IR Primary & General 786-9534 Pat Coffey DFL Primary & General 786-4490 DFL Primary & General Darlene Selleck DFL Primary & General 784-6216 Alice Frits DFL Primary & General 784-2808 Carole Golden IR General only 784-4127 PRECINCT 2 ChaiTrperson: Jean Johnson DFL Primary & General 784-8698 Judges: Mary Preciado DFL Primary & General 784-1577 Tom Dreshar DFL Primary & General 784-8961 Betty Peihowski DFL Primary & General 784-5373 Vicki Crowe IR Primary & General 784-9237 Irene St. Louis IR Primary & General 786-2973 Judy Petersen IR Primary & General 786-2194 June Schleiss IR Primary & General 784-0269 Arlene Norton DFL General Only 786-6878 PRECINCT 3 Chairperson: Kathy Mac Runnels IR Primary and General 786-6091 Judges: Shirley Sinderson IR Primary and General 786-5755 Lea Burggraf. iR Primary and General 784-4946 Judy Rowley iR Primary and General 784-8046 Marian Winther DFL Primary and General 784-3196 Delane Erickson DFL Primary and General 784-4084 r PAGE TWO PRECINCT 3 (continued) Shirley Ramacher Amy Hodges Noel Samuelson PRECINCT 4 C aTi r�rson: Dorothy Wilhaus Mary Bixler Betty Skelly Rose Kelner Lili Ripley Isabelle Wille Jonathan Thomas Barb Haake Barb Snell CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW 1984 ELECTION JUDGES DFL Primary & General 786-3052 DFL Primary & General 784-6284 IR General Only 786-5142 DFL Primary & General 786-3052 DFL Primary & General 784-8250 DFL Primary & General 784-3635 DFL Primary & General 784-1481 IR Primary & General 786-4693 IR Primary & General 784-5492 IR Primary & General 784-5205 IR Primary & General 786-1022 DFL General Only 4" - - - RESOLUTION NO. 1811 PITY OF MOUNDS VIEW ?00ti COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING STAFF TO SUBMIT THE FINAL L.A.W.C.O.N. GRANT APPLICATION FOR GREENFIELD PARK AND DELINEATING FUNDING SOURCES FOR 'THE CITY'S 50% MATCH WHEREAS, staff submitted and had approved a preliminary grant application for they development of Greenfield Park; and WHEREAS, the total grant amount has been approved at 5175,000.00 based on a 50% match of $87,500.00 from the City; and WHEREAS, the Greenfield Park improvements will include site work, bituminous trails, lighted tennis courts, bituminous road and parking, and relocation of the existing baseball field; and WHEREAS, the final grant deadline application is October 22, 1984; and WHEREAS, the Greenfield Park development project is in full accordance with the City's adopted Parks and Open Space Plan; and WHEREAS, the Mounds View Parks and Recreation Commission has reviewed, authorized and stated that Greenfield Park is a high priority in their five year capital improvement plan. WHEREAS, the 50% City match will be funded from the fol- lowing City funds: 1985 Budgeted Park Improvements ...... $40,000.00 1985 Capital Reserves ................ 19,469.00 1984 Budget Reserve for Capital Improvements ....................... 16,000.00 Storm Water Management Fund .......... 12,031.00 TOTAL ................... $87,500.00 NOW, THEREFORE., BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View City Council hereby authorizes staff to submit a final grant applica- tion to the Minnesota Department of Energy and Economic Develop- ment in the amount of $175,000.00 based on a 50% match from the City of Mounds View. Adopted this 8th day of October, 1984. ATTEST: Mayor McCarty ClPrk-AdminFstralor Pauley (SEAL) V&0� Je RESOLUTION NO, 1812 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA A RESOLUTION CALLING FOR AN OPEN PROCESS TO SELECT AN EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT ASSOCIATION WHEREAS, the majority of the employees of the City of Mounds View belong to the Public Employees Retirement Association; and WHEREAS, the City levies property taxes which are contributed to the Public Employees Retirement Association as the employer share of retirement benefits for City employees; and WHEREAS, a number of Public Employees Retirement Associaton Board members have raised significant questions relating to the appointment process used to hire an interim Executive Director of the Public Employees Retirement �t;.. Association; and WHEREAS, the City of Mounds View wants to insure that all Public Employees Retirement Association Board members meet their fiduciary responsibilities: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Mounds View requests that a five year compliance audit of the Public Employees Retirement Association be conducted by the Legislative Auditor; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City of Mounds View supports the actions of some Public Employees Retirement Association Board members to remove the interim executive director and to provide for an open process to select a Public Employees Retirement Association Executive Director; Adopted this ___ day of ATTEST: Mayor (SEAL) Clerk -Administrator 1984. RESOLUTION NO. 1804 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING A POLICY REGARDING MONIES RECEIVED FROM THE MINNESOTA STATE; AID CONSTRUCTION FUND FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES WHEREAS, Staff members of the Public Works/Community Development Department are capable of performing design, preparation of plans and specifications, construction management and other engineering functions regarding Minnesota State Aid (M.S.A.) Streets; and WHEREAS, applicable MSA statutes and regulations permit governmental units to perform various engineering services on approved MSA street projects and to be paid from MSA funds for those services; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Council that, whenever it is practicable to do so, the Public Works/Community Development Staff perform engineering services on MSA street projects, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that any monies received for engineering services performed by Staff be transferred from the particular construction fund upon completion of the project to the City's General Fund since that fund finances the operations of the Public Works/Community Development Department. ATTEST: (SEAL) Adopted this day of 1984 tlayor Clerk' -Administrator MEMO TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL ROM: FINANCE IIIRECIOR-TRESURF,R BRAGFR 1 DATE: SEPTEMBER 24,1984 SUBJECT: PROPOSED RESOLUTION REGARDING TRANSFER OF MSA MONIES RECEIVED FOR IN-HOUSE ENGINEERING ON MSA PROJECTS The Staff of the Public Works/Community Development Department has performed all of the engineering services associated with this summer's NSA street construction projects, i.e, design, preparation of plans and specifications, review of bids, and construction management. For performance of those services the City will receive $30,000 in MSA monies. The 1985 budget proposes that those monies be issued for the 1985 street maintenance program. Upon the advice of our auditors I have prepared a resolution which authorizes the transfer of the monies paid the City for engineering services to the General Fund from the MSA Construction Account. DB/mjs I 10 RESOLUTION NO.1815 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COIINTY OF RAMSEY STATE. OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE'S PROPOSAL FOR A REGIONAL SPEED SKATING FACILITY WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Council has determined that there is a need for a 400-meter artificially refrigerated Speedskating Rink in the Metropolitan area, and WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Council is seeking proposals for a Speedskating site and implementation program, and WHEREAS, the Roseville Ad Hoc Citizens Speedskating Committee has selected a site in the City of Roseville, and WHEREAS, this site is strategically located in the Metropolitan area with excellent access from I-35W, I-35E and 36, and WHEREAS, the largest concentration of speedskaters is in the City of St. Paul and northern suburbs with this area producing eight of the twelve local speedskaters currently on the national team, and WHEREAS, there are few metropolitan facilities in the northern suburbs as compared to other areas. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Mounds View supports the City of Roseville's proposal to locate a regional speedskating facility in their community, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a copy of this resolution be provided to the City of Roseville. Adopted this 8th day of October, 1984. ATTEST: Mayor (SEAL) _ Clerk -Administrator 4k�, k MEMO TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL FROM: CLERK -ADMINISTRATOR DATE: OCTOBER 4, 1984 SUBJECT: SIX MONTH PERFORMANCE REVIEW OF STEVE THATCHER Attached please find a photocopy of six month performance review of Public Works/Community Development Director Steve Thatcher. You will rote that I have identified his performance as being classified as progressing. Please do not mistake this to mean that his performance is less than fully satisfactory. In fact, it is very close to being fully satisfactory, however, I do not feel that any employee's performance after six months can be fully satisfactory, especially when they are unfamiliar with an organization and in Steve's case with the interworkings of City Government. It is my opinion that Steve has performed in a most acceptable fashion and that the quality of work from his departments is most commendable. Therefore, I would recommend Council's approval of my performance review of Mr. Thatcher and the $600 per year salary increase agreed to in his initial hiring. RECOMMENDATION: Approve performance review of Steve Thatcher dated September 7, 1984 and adopt Resolution No. 1817 Approving the Appointment of Steve Thatcher As A Full Time City Employee. DFP/mjs RESOLUTION NO. 1817 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION APPROVING THE APPOINTMENT OF STEVE THATCHER AS A FULL TIME CITY EMPLOYEE, WHEREAS, the Mounds View City Code, Chapter 6.04 defines a full time employee who is one who has successfully completed the required probationary period and who was employed on a schedule of at least 40 hours per week, and WHEREAS, Steve Thatcher has successfully completed his six month probation period; and WHEREAS, it was agreed by the City Council to raise the annual wage of Steve Thatcher by $600 per year after a successful probationary period. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mounds View does hereby appoints Steve Thatcher as a full time City employee and directs the Finance Director to increase the annual wage of the Director of Public Works/Community Development by $600 per year effective September 5, 1984. ATTEST: (SEAL) Adopted this 8th day of October, 1984. Mayor --1-- Clerk-Administrator i RE 30LUTI C11 110. 1814 CITY OF IPUhC,; VIE:: COUNTY OF N4,MEY STATE OF 1'1'dill'"O'IY+ APPROVING JUST AND CORRECT CLAIMS AGAINST CITY FUNDS WHEREAS, the City Council of founds Vleu•, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 412.2'41, has full authority over the financial affairs of the City and; 13MEREAS, The City Council has reviewed the claims numbers: 17051 through 17055 in the amount, of $ 1Z.608.37 17056 through 17074 in the amount of ._UQ,28 14560 through 14637 in the amo+ant of $ 20-981,90 through in the amount of TOTAL AhIOUNT OF CLATkS PRESENTED $ 111 P880,55 and has found said claims to be just and correct; (list of any exception) NOYI71HEREFOU, be it resolved that the City Council of Mounds View hereby approved the attached lists of claims dated by the vote ayes naves ATTEST: (SEAL) Mayor Clerk -Administrator AddiLtonal Direct Expenditures CHECK AMOUNT CLAIMANT PURPOSE 17051 $3,418.85 Croup Health Plan, Inc. Insurance 17052 84.10 Fidelity & Guaranty Life Ins. Insurance 17053 203.22 L.M.G.I.T. Insurance 17054 10.20 Minnesota Mutual Insurance 17055 8,892.00 All Seasons Roofing Co. Structure Repair $12,608.37 - �' C ITY rF P^C>;I ."I FA CHFrK M A P C V V T 017056 C17057 `I °II 01705E .yh-- �'� 017C59 017060 L�- IPf, 017061 E 4" 017062 JA4 C17063 C17064 C37C6E 017066 C17067 01706E 017069 017070 017071 011077 017074 18 Is 1s 214,1 7 ?p?4r,.7? 33j,'E8'3,0? 30,00 264.73 5cc, C0 76.60 2Q2.5C 6.0E 61.25 9C,CC 40.00 2500 S.00 1p22.3.68 L349.91 114,9E 35,872.63 7Br290,26 • n n E Y E r L A I Y 4 v T P! i F r r S f STfTr: TPrASURFR FI�SIO"•S STA1F TPrAS — P F R E PFNSTrtiS r1P`T STATF PANM ^F SALAOTFS, PECULAF AND—SALAPIEFtTFMP+PART T'VF APO—CVFPTIPFv PFfLd.AT STATr TPWUPF? DISC OFWF 5Vrl'l.W FOPOFP TPUCwFP P E F U N r I1 S POSTKASTFP POSTAGE rTTY rr POUF'DS VI FM SUPPLIFSjfOPEDATTNF AND—CONFFPENCFS AND —DISC CFFICE SUFPLIFS AND—POSTAGF ANn—MTLFAOF AN'D—SUPPLIESP VEHICLE ANO—LNIFDPMS + CLOTHING DEANNA POPTFP+SON SALARIESoTEMP+PART TIME PITA OOCKEN MILEAGE SHTPLF.Y P STNOWON SALARTFSITEKP+FART TIME CITY OF MOUNCS VIER REFUNDS BPAOLFY VALTON REFUNDS FIRST RANK nF ST PAUL PAYING AGENT FEES STATE TPEAS — P E R A PENSIONS STATE TREASURER PENSIONS STATE TRFAS — P F R A FFNSIENS ICMA PENSIONS FTP57 STATE PANK CF SALARIF.Sj RFGUTAP ANC—SALARIFSpTEMP+FART TIME NFCESSAPY ExPENn1TVPFS STNCF LAST COUNCIL M`ETTNG • ([I7Y D F "'I t'+! rS V I FW r r 7 5 F A y t ^ t r 1 C-flr-pf lllir ? 0.: CpFrK A M D U T r L A I A N T P 11 p P C 5 7 014560 6C.00 A F t SUPEPInR Sao CO SUPPLIESt PtrC!4(-RNDS e I 1�4561 letatf V+T INFI,Pu�TTON .11 Ol SYSTFMF p V F FU NT C I TI ON 3--T rt F F 14� f. 014362 549CO A L P INS ON SUPPLITSYOPFOATING 014563 28601 AMERICAN OFFICE PRODUCTS RISC orr!CE SUPPLIE! 014564 16,70 4RUCr ANnFRSrN 5UPPI IFSPOPI.:PATTNG 115,36 FAQL F ANDERSEN + ASSOC SUPPLIESiEFERAITF.G C14 'tee 493,19 ARSENAL SAND 4 GRAVEL CO SUPPLTFSPOPEPATTNG Yi 014567 7E.55 CAPITAL FLFCTQCK'TCS PEPATP!p EOUTPFrNT .1456e 12#832,48 CITY OF CHANHASSEN OTFER PROFESSIONAL T F FV 014569 165000 DUN t BPAOSIR EFT CONFE PENCES 30400 EL PAPKFTING SUPPLTESYGPFRhTTNG 0 ),L—o 145 7 1. 69l00 GALLAGHEPS SERVICE INC REFUSE COLLECT.ION- . C14572 10.36 BRIAN FOFFMAN NTLEAGE --- - JO 01457? 252 .7 F LIttIF SUBURBAN NEWS LEGAL NOTICES AND-DEPOSITS-DFV ESCROW 014574 129.85 LINCOLN ELEVATOR SERVICE REP*p BLOCS + GROUNDS 3a 014575 24957 MIDLAND PREOUCTS SUPPLIESsOPERATING 014576 qsco M144 FIRE INC SUPPLIC-SPOPEPATING 014577 4C900 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW REFUNDS Al 14578 5245— MOU4DSVIEW OUR CWN HOWE SUPPLIEStCPFPAT.TNG. AND-SUPPLTFSP eLnr5+GRN'.S 35,45 PCUNOS VIEW PPINTING PRINTING it!- 01458 C E65 9 81 N W FELL TELEPHONE CO COMPUNTCATInHS-TEL1"HVNF Iccocr nPNALP PAULFY MILEAGF 0145F? 6F05 PEPSI COLA FOTTLINC CC 9 E F V N v C1458? 15973 PCWFP BRAKE FOVIPPENT SUPPITES.9 VtHYCLE 014584 480 cc P99fESSTnNAl wcrssTPG 97PE9 PROFr5STr4!AL SE R V _ .0145E5 70.00 RAPSEY COUNTY PTAC TRA114INC I i 0. ; M t CITY CF MrUrCS Vjr4 A C C^ UA! T S P A Y A F l F iC-Ca-gA oACF CHECK 0 A M r L' k' T C I A I A A T I: P P f F I' 014586 014587 P� 01458P C14589 014590 �Y uI u`- ! 014591 I15'_ 014F92 014593 014 594 014595 014596 C1A597 014 598 014599 014600 014601 014602 01460? 014604 C14605 014606 014607 C14608 014609 014610 6R.00 904 EY CCUM TPFkFUPFF CON STPOCTICN ?P.CC PnAP OUNNEF PAPCFL tFP CTPFP oPgFF!:crrg6L RV 12P.00 PnrFLA S QOSF SALAPIFSiTF.NP+PIPT 'III F4.96 SIFfkS SPORT SFnP TPtI4ING 151.41 SMITH L1;MPFP CC SUPPLIFS#OPFQATTNG ANP—SUPFLIFSr RLnGS+Gok S PLDGS + CPOUN'S 17.34 ST PAUL POOK+STATTCNF.QY PQIf1TNG AND-SVPPLIFS#OPE9tTING 25.00 T + S TFnPHTES SUPPLTFS,OPFFATTNG 120.00 TRABSCONT FPOKEPS INf. IYSURANCE + BORPS 37.00 TUSHIf:—PONTCOHEPYCASSOC SUPPLIFSz BLDGS+GRNOS el.00 WASTE MANAGFFFNT ILAINF QFFUSF COLLECTION 17,50 JUCY CRIHAF PROCPAM INSTRUCTORS 404427 DF.BRA DEF. MFDOPN PRCGRAN INSTRUCTORS 90.00 DFA M FORTENSON SALAPIFSrTFFP+TART TIFF 60.00 BPETT OHNSTAP SLIPPLIF.SPDPERATTNG 25.00 CQEG PESALL PROCFAR INSTRUCTORS 240eOO XIVVAPA LICATF PPCGRAF TNSTRIICTOPS 155.99 TKOA OTHER PRCFESSIORAL `F.Py 401.00 KEN IELN PROGP.AN INSTRUCTORS. 215.00 WAPMFRS IMISTOTU SUPPL SUPPLIFS,OPFRtTINC 40.00 WILLIAM WTNPLEP. REFUNDS 30.00 OF.OFCF MITCNFLL RF.FUIdDS IC.CO MPc JnSFoHSCM F E F I.! k' 0 LC.00 CHATS PETFRSON P F F U N O 10.00 YHTTNEY OKF" R E F U N D 10,00 RC49TE FCKfMnT P r= U N P CITY OF KOL'N05 VTFV A r r 0'J " T e P I v A^ t 1r-�'-Q: PAGF 4 ' CHECK a A P D L' K T C t I T° A T u L P r '• 5 r 014611 1#32E.0? MPVA-FPCST# IKC OFPATPS# UT11ITTES 01�617 dC,CC r�CCI A5 rTh'NDFRF PFFIih'CS 014613 An,rr TFRAY TFC"AS RIFUlOS � a ;. 014614 90,00 r.FPALO PLOMSFRG RF•FUNCS y! a 'S 014615 3C.00 F'1PFRT E HUNT ACP PFFLNOS ,'j_ 014616 30.CC VICTCP FFPCKOSKI REFUNDS 014617 70,00 FPFD 14ILLYFR R F F U N r n i 01461P 2C,CC JUDY FTLFATE P F F L' N C 014619 15.00 MRS KAVANAUCH R E F U N C + I � 15.00 - -, PA :..r_. f.+. 01462C DCRTS ER ICKSON a F. FUND b 014621 8.00 MPS PEACH R F. F U N D 014622. 15.0E MRS NESSIP. P E F U N C. 014E23 15.0E MRS ECr,FRTCHS REFUND P. 4. �;'• , 014624 2000 RPS FIELDS R F F U N 0 I ?' 014625 23.00 MARY JANF GROSS R E F U N C _ ?' C1462E 15.00 MRS HERMANN R F F U N 0 r,y, 014677 15.00 ANPY KOV4CS P F F 11 N D It- 23,00 RUTH MOOPE P. E F U N D -0146?0 I° 014629 46.00 HENRY OLSEN P F F U k D Y 01463C 1°.CO MPS ROOS R F F U h' 0 014631 15.00 MRS SMIF:JA ? E F U N C "j C14632 151 OC YPS THYYTAN P F. F U k 0 T) 014632 2.0E RUTH VAN PFr�F P r F U N r ` 014634 3C. CC "' VTN CE R E F L N D -_ 014635 23.00 CINDY W WS' F F F U N C '; • '' CiAE?E ?400 KATHLFFN A NACRUNNFLS SAL1s1C5#TFMP+F1: r 11 vF _ 014637 '.5.00 YFTRC OFST CO+1T?CL INC REP.# BLOGS + CF11110i 78 20981.0C CFFCYS WRITTEk ' TCTAL CF 96 CHECKS TOTAL 99p 272,1a 4�F, /o If \ ORDINANCE NO. 383 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE FIXING THE SALARIES OF THE MAYOR AND COUNCILMEMBERS The City Council of the City of Mounds View ordains: Section 1. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 412.181, the salary of the mayor is fixed at $3,000.00 per year and salary of each councilmember is fixed at $2,700.00 per year. Section 2. This ordinance shall go into after an election occuring after the adoption of this ordinance. Section 3. Ordinance 195 is repealed. Read by the City Council of the City of Mounds View this day of 1984. Read and passed by the City Council of the City of Mounds View this day of 1984. ATTEST: Mayor (SEAL) Clerk-Adminstrator ^` APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney TO: tlayor & Council FROM: finance Director -Treasurer Hrager DATE: October 3, 1984 RE: REVENUE SHARING HANDICAPPED REGULATIONS The Office of Revenue Sharing has issued regulations pertaining to discrimination on the basis of handicapped. Those regulations required that local governmental units conduct a self evaluation of it's programs and services in order to determine compliance with those handicapped regulations. Also required is a transition plan, if as a result of the self evaluation, action must be taken to correct violations of the regulations. In addition the City is required to adopt a grievance procedure to handle complaints of discrimination by the City on the basis of handicapped status. According to the regulations the self evaluation and transition plan must be completed no later than October 17, 1984. Any actions that need to be taken to correct violations of the regulations must be completed no later than October 17, 1986. City staff has conducted a self evaluation of city programs and services in order to determine compliance with the handicapped regulations. A copy of that self evaluation is attached for your reviewal. The City has also prepared a transition plan to correct violations of the regulations. These violations pertain to two of the City's park shelter buildings. According to the handicapped regulations these buildings should be ramped in order to make them accessible to handicapped persons. The transition plan states that these items would be budgeted in the City's 1986 budget. However, if funds should become available during 1985 the City could then ramp those: park shelter buildings prior to 1986. Also attached is a grievance procedure which staff believes to be in compliance with requirements of the handicapped regulations. Basically this grievance policy is substantially the same as the grievance procedure outlined under Chapter 6 of the City Code for grievances filed by employees. RECOM6fENDATION: Council adopt the attached resolution approving the City's self evaluation, transition plan and grievance procedure. DB/ds Attachments RESOLUTION NO. 1813 rIN CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE CITY'S SELF EVALUATION, TRANSITION PLAN, AND GRIEVANCE POLICY PURSUANT TO REVENUE, SHARING HANDICAPPED DISCRIMINATION REQUIREMENTS WHEREAS, the Office of Revenue Sharing has established regulations regarding handicapped discrimination; and WHEREAS, said regulations require local governments to conduct a self evaluation of their programs and services to determine compliance with said regulations, develop a transition plan to correct any areas of non-compliance, and adopt a grievance procedure to resolve complaints of discrimination on the basis of handicap; and WHEREAS, the City staff has conducted a self evaluation, developed a transition plan, and prepared a grievance procedure; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Council ' approves the self evaluation and transition plan which is attached and is a part -of this resolution. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Cuuncil approves the grievance procedure to resolve complaints of handicapped discrimination. Adopted this - day of __ 1984. ATTEST: (SEAL) Mayor C1erk-Administra-tor� ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS OF REVENUE SHARING HANDICAPPED DISCRIMINATION REGULATIONS NOTICE OF REVENUE SHARING HANDICAPPED REGULATIONS The City published notice in the New Brighton Bulletin on January 13, 1964 of its policy against handicapped discrimination. Donald Pauley, Clerk -Administrator was designated as the "responsible employee" to coordinate implementation of the handicapped discrimination requirements. Notification was also posted in the City Hall Foyer and a copy of the Notice was sent to WCCO radio with the request that it be read as a Public Service Announcement. The City will also take continuing steps to notify the public of changes made to improve access by the handicapped to programs and activities of the City. Such notification will include notices and articles in the City Newsletter which is published six times annually as well as notification in the official newspaper of the City, the New Brighton Bulletin. II. SELF EVALUATION OF CITY PROGRAMS AND SERVICES A. Physical Accessability to Public Facilities Public Works Director Thatcher conducted an inspection of the City Hall Facility to determine its accessibility by handicapped persons. The walkway to the front entrance contains a ramp from the parking lot. Doors and doorways are of sufficient width to allow access by handicapped persons. The rest room facilities have railings which would assist handicapped persons in using those facilities. The meeting rooms in the basement of tho City Hall are accessible by an elevator. The Public Works Director's analysis is that the City Hall Building is in compliance with handicapped regulations. Parks and Recreation Director Anderson has inspected the school facilities that are used in the conduct of recreation programs offered by the City, including Pinewood and Sunnyside Elementary Schools and the Edgewood Community Center. Each of these facilities are totally accessible to handicapped persons. Park and Recreation Director Anderson has also inspected City Parks and finds that, in general, they are totally accessible to handicapped persons as they are flat, with no major steps, large hills or bermed areas which would make them difficult to access by handicapped individuals. The City currently has six shelter buildings which are located at the following parks sites: 1. Groveland Park - this building has a ramp and would be hand capped accessible. 2. Hillview Park - this shelter building has five steps required for entry to the doorway. This is not accessible to handicapped persons. It could be made II. SELF LVAiMATION OF CITY PROGRAMS AND SERVICIiS (continued) A. Physical Access ibi1ty to Public [-acilities (continued) 2. Hillview Park - continued accessible to handicapped pursons by ramping. 3. Greenfield Park - this park contains a small storage shelter building and is accessible to the handicapped although at the present time this facility is not utilized by the public. 4. Lambert Park - this shelter building is totally accessible to handicapped through either the garage doors or the two main entrance doors which are of sufficient width to allow access by handicapped individuals in wheelchairs. 5. Woodcrest Park - this shelter building is not presently accessible to handicapped persons as it has one step requiring access to the doorway. This shelter building could be made accessible to the handicapped by ramping. It should be noted that the Woodcrest Shelter Building is only used during the winter for warming house purposes in connection with the ice skating program. Thus, it would not appear to be necessary to ramp the entrace. 6. Shelter Building Beach House at Lakeside Park - this facility is totally accessible to the handicapped. B. Availability of Services and Pro r9 ams To Hanoica rtllavua The vast majority of services provided by the City to its residents are those which are traditionally associated with municipalities, that is, construction and maintenance of streets and highways, police and fire protection services, protective inspections programs, provision of municipal water and sewer services, and park construction and maintenance. The only types of services provided by the City which could conceivably be offered in such a manner that could be discriminatory to handicapped persons are administrative services and recreation programs. The types of administrative services provided by the City are: 1. Licensing 2. Voter Registration and Elections 3. Information and Information Referral i-N. II. SELF EVALUATION Oil Crry PROGRAM", AND SERVICES (continued) H. Availability f Services and Programs To Handicapped Persons (continued) ---- In all three of the above instances the limitations on delivering those services to handicapped persons apply to the sight and hearing impaired. In the case of the hearing impaired, part of this limitation is being resolved by the City's purchase of a telecommunications device for the dear (TDD) in the Fall of 1984. This device will allow for telephone conmiunications with the deaf, however, this does not resolve the difficulty of face to face situations. In that case City Staff must rely upon informational brochures that we have available and the ability of City Staff to find a common ground for handling the situation. In the case of the visually handicapped, except for blind or significantly sight impaired individuals, the City can communicate most written information by enlarging it on our photocopying equipment to a level where it is readable for the affected individual. For those individuals who are severely sight impaired or blind, we will need to depend upon our ability to verbally communicate with the individual and provide whatever assistance is necessary under the circumstances. t C. Recreation Programming Offered By The City's Department Of Parks, Recreation and Forestry At the present time all of the City's recreation programs are available to handicapped persons. The City presently "mainstreams" individuals at the Groveland and Lambert Park Shelter Buildings during our summer recreation programs. The City also offers adaptive aquatic programs on Thursday evenings at the Edgewood Community Center Pool. The City's Park and Recreation Department has in the past and will continue in the future to make efforts to work with local residents to mainstream their children into our recreation programs through the assistance of volunteers and/or special assistants. These special assistants could include, but are not limited to, qualified sign language interpretors or persons qualified to provide braille or taped material. D. Policies and Practices Concerning Emolovment The Clerk -Administrator, whose duties include personnel management functions, has reviewed the City's employment practices and is of the opinion that the City's practices are presently consistent with Federal and State Law as it relates to non-discrimination on the basis of an individual's handicaps. Chapter 6.06 of the Mounds View Municipal Coda states, 116.06 Appointment Procedure - all appointments in the Municipal Service shall he made according to merit and fitness. No person shall in any way be favored or discriminated against because of race, creed, color, nation of origin, age, sex, handicap, II. SELF EVALUATION OF CITY PROGRAMS AND SF.RVICCS (continued) D. Policies and Practices Concerning Employment political affiLiations or beliefs." Regulations regarding discrimination on the basis of handicap and employment have been reviewed and we feel that the City does not discriminate in its employment practices, that is, in the soliciting of applications, recruiting and advertising for the position, interviewing, physical examinations, testing and other screening procedures. The City will make reasonable accomodations for known physical or mental limitations of qualified handicapped applicants or employees when such accomodation would not impose an undue hardship on the operations of a C ty program or activity. III. TRANSITION PLAN It is proposed that the shelter buildings which have been identified as inacces.ible to handicapped persons be made accessible by ramping in the early Spring or Summer of 1986. The City's 198i budget does not presently provide for such an expenditure. If sufficient funds should become available during 19K these buildings will be ramped. However, provisions a 11 be made to provide for funding of these structural than )s in the City's 1986 budget and such changes will be scheduled for completion no later than August 31, 1986. IV. GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE. TO RESOLVE. COMPLIANCE OF HANDICAPPED DISCRIMINATION I have proposed grievance procedure which specifies steps to be followed and the resolution of a grievance alleging violation of handicapped discrimination regulation has been prepared and is attached. Staff feels that this grievance procedure satisfies the requirements of the Office of Revenue Sharing Regulations pertaining to discriination on the basis of handicap. (a SECTION 504 GRTEVANCE PROCEDURE 1. A complaint should be filed in writing or verbally, contain the name and address of the person filing it, and briefly describe the alleged violation of the regulations. 2. A complaint should be filed within 30 days after the complainant becomes aware of the alleged violation. (Processing of allegations of discrimination which occured before this grievance procedure was in place will be considered on a case -by -case basis.) 3. An investigation, as may be appropriate, shall follow a filing of a complaint. The investigation shall be conducted by Donald F. Pauley. These rules contemplate informal but thorough investigations, affording all interested persons and their representatives, if any, an opportunity to submit evidence relevant to a complaint. 4. A written determination as to the validity of the complaint and a description of the resolution, if any, shall be issued by Donald F. Pauley and a copy forwarded to the complainant no later than 30 days after its filing. 5 The Section 504 coordinator shall maintain the files and records of. the City of Mounds View relating to the complaints filed. 5. The complainant can request a reconsideration of the case in instances where he or she is dissatisfied dith the resoluion. The request for reconsideration should be made within 15 days to the City Council. 7. The right of a person to a prompt and equitable resolution of the complaint filed hereunder shall not be impaired by the person's pursuit of other remedies such as the filing of a section 504 complaint with the responsible federal department or agency. Utilization of this grievance procedure is not a prerequisite to the pursuit of other remedies. 8. These rules shall be construed to protect the substantive rights of interested persons, to meet appropriate due process standards, and to assure that the City of Mounds View complies with Section 504 and implementing regulations. CITY ON MOUNDS VIEW CITY COUNCIL AGENDA SESSION October 15, 1984 7.00 p.m. 1. Consideration of Staff Memorandum regarding 1985 Fire Department Budget. 2. Consideration of Staff Memorandum regarding Telephone System Proposals. 3. Consideration of Staff Memorandum regarding Civil Defense Communications. 4. Consideration of Resolution No. 1819 Resolution of Appreciation to Frank Gabrysh For Community Interest Above and Beyond the Call of Duty. 5. Consideration of Staff Memorandum on Bills From Serco Laboratory for Well $3 Pilot Plant Phase I Work. 6. Consideration of Staff Memorandum on Scrap/Surplus Water Meters. 7. Consideration of Staff Memurandum on Assistant Building Inspector./Civil Engineering Technician. 8. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding Additional Parking Facility for First State Bank of New Brighton. 9. Consideration of Resolution No. 1820 Commending Matt Rowley for Achieving Eagle Scout Status, IIIiMO 'f0: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: CLERK -ADMINISTRATOR DATE: OCTOBER 8, 1984 SUBJECT: 1985 FIRE DEPARTMENT BUDGET Attached pleaso find a copy of the revised 1985 Fire Department Budget which was submitted to the three cities after a meeting with the Fire Department in an attempt to obtain reductions in their budget requests. I have been advised by Spring Lake Park and Blaine that the City Councils in those two cities have accepted the revised budget and, therefore, find that I am forced to recommend acceptance of this budget by the Mounds View City Council. I feel that I am forced to do so simply on the basis that I do not feel that any further efforts on the part of the City of Mounds View to obtain reductions in the budget would be fruitful due to the difficulty in negotiating on a one-to-one basis with Chief Fagerstrom. The City's 1985 budget which was adopted by the City Council on September 24, 1984 provides for.• the payment of Fire Service Contract Fees in the amount of $100,253.00. The revised budget being presented to you this evening calls for a payment for Fire Services in the amount of $103,035.00. therefore, it will be necessary for the Council to approve a Contingency Transfer in the amount of $2,782.00 in order to fully fund this contract. RECOMMENDATION: Staff would recommend Council approval of the revised 1985 Fire Department Budget dated September 12, 1984 which provides a contribution in the amount $103,035.00 on the part of the City of Mounds Vied and a transfer from Contingency in the amount of $2,782.00. DFP/mjs Attachment: ITEM CAPITAL OUTLAY BUILDINGS APPARATUS SPRING 1AFT PARK FIRE DEPT., 1NC, 1985 FINAL, DUBGI'T 1984 1985 Difference OPERATING EXPENSF: PAYROLL UTILITIES SUPPLIES /RFP1,WE);^IT OF O'.V RADIO EQUIP IFNT TRUCK FIAINTEI!ANCE/CAB F 0I1 TUITIONS /DUE3/CONT•P+'.F1!CES BUILDING 11AINTF.NANCTi/SU1'P',V-', FIRE p!IrVFNTION/TRATN7N0 HEAT INSURANCE./LEGAL/ACCOUNTI'lr MEDICAL. UNIYORMS WOP,D PKOCF:SS01:/r.Oi•!rIIT:.R FELLNESS PROGRAM TOTAL. CONTINGENCY 1`I111D* TOTAL, FINAL 1985 Bl'I CI'T *Any miscellaneous i.ncome recri-ed in 1985 will be credited ro thr Contingency Fund so no requirement is included for thin, 1 T1 292 9,875 1£?,h^5 +. 5? 5 1, okvt 2, non n, 364 5,853 9,15n '-5,555 + , DO11 , 91r, i,B50 ,19 SG�ti, G39 s nn,294 __27,496 87,790 185,154 8,700 18,422 7,250 ^_9,700 2,500 121241 i,174 8,150 55,244 1,275 9,215 8,800 1,760 375 .q. g/�42�375• + $ 4,525 + 7,862 - 1,175 + 17 + 725 1,300 + 500 + 1,877 ' + 316 - 1,000 + 91689 + 275 + 6,715 + 2,950 +`y760 $33,736 .0. + $339736 PI 9112/84 r 51Rr\'C LAKE. PARE: FIRE: W-1T., Mr. 1985 Final Bud"t Pine ltao .15SC0Iha1 VA.!,ATIO_; - i:STIMATE.0 1984 AMUNT CIT1 B1AIIdF: Anoka County Ramsey County Ilann)s vrr7a Ramsey 0ounty WING I)M. PARK Anoka County Ramscy County Total TOTALS $147,7.63,20C G79L61 147,942,E ; 1 O.n01, 61^ 567,1411 ?0,568,75C rM:T� I_T"1Bll' _tn:1 LT:M ITa 1985 TOTAL BUDGET %IAC IIIC X: TnTAI. ALILa'AT• b X CITYIF ?i1A 111" ifcUNI,' ',;PRIlIG TIVI TOTAL $141,942,813 57,585,641 3O 56OA758 $2360097, 217. Ar10uNT Sr,t,7., 375 20 1on1 W2,275 4264,344 1()3, 035 54,396 S4221275 PERCENT OF TOTAL 62.6 24.4 13.0 100% VI V0,1 sjppy.,!.•i - Flp!, 30),117P MUT]IN DAYI.: scnttmF.r.t 1, 1cAi. TD11i: Vr(l Bourn rACr,: !•11ou.4s View City 9e1.1 THCgr d; .1TfWMNO: I tchord :..Johnson, dLsine city Manager L•onald C, i'auley, Mounds 'tiew Clerk -Administrator :'anal%, l:ra:rr, ,Sounds Viol; Finance Director 1,..o!r Fa!;vn:,trnm, Fire Chici i.es Co:<, .iec:otary - Fire Dept. board of Directors The concerns raised in +'on Pauley's l(,ttcr t) `ugest 24 and the Fire Chief's response thereto were discussed. Two line items were: ai!:led out .air:: a view tc reduce the proposed expenditures, nomr.ly payroll ant: tic wr!lness r,ro!!ram. 1, Payroll It was agreed to by Close rrencnt l5at the nayrol.l increase would he reduced to A jfi, rrom the Q.T/, nTnposeJ and that future rsvroll increases !an!h i)e on a!, ennual hssia rather than on a tidannual hssis 1, 1leilnesa Progror, Don ,'auley was to have his keercat!on director research the cost of orovidinq tilenr. sere tvprogram as the fire department had proposed and to rnn!art Chi.er a;crattom with the coat figures. 11 Z MEMO TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL i FROM. CLERK-ADMINISTRATO( DATE: OCTOBER 8, 1984 \j SUBJECT: TELEPHONE SYSTEM PROPOSAL As I have advised you in the Administrative Newsletter, Staff has been reviewing the proposals the City received for a "state- of-the-art" telephone system to replace that which we currently rent from Northwestern Bell at a cost of $275.00/month. After eliminating those proposals which exceeded the City's 1985 Budget allocation for telephone system purchase/rental, four proposals remained which were demonstrated to me over a one week period of time. Of these four, one, Hauenstein and Burmeister, presented a system which was essentially identical to two other proposals which were at a lower cost. The second, AT&T, presented a hybrid system which could not be considered "state-of-the-art", posed several operational difficulties over the other system, and exceeded our budget when they submitted revised figures. The remaining two proposals, Executone and First Tel, include equipment that would be a significant improvement over the equipment currently in City Hall and are both available to us. under lease/purchase arrangements of 72 and 80 months respectively at a lower cost than provided for in the 1985 Budget. Also, both of these firms had had positive reference checks from users of the same or similar systems. It is my desi;.e at this time to have the two systems demonstrated to City Hall Staff during a special staff meeting and let the Staff decide which system they want. Since neither would exceed the 1985 Budget and they are within $20.00 per month of each other, I would request Council authorization to negotiate a contract with the successful proposer for your approval. RECOMMENDATION: Authorize Staff to negotiate a contract for your approval for lease/purchase of a telephone system from the firm selected by the City [fall Staff after a demonstration of the systems. DFP/mjs MEMO TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL- ,11 FROM: CLERK -ADMINISTRATOR f�. DATE: OCTOBER 10, 1984 SUBJECT: CIVIL DEFENSE COMMUNICATIONS As you know over the past year the Ramsey County Civil Defense Directors have been meeting and establishing a formal organization to undertake cooperative efforts in preparing for and handling civil defense emergencies within Ramsey County and adjoining governmental jurisdictions. The first major accomplishment of this organization was the development and implementation of a Mutual Aid Agreement among cities in Ramsey County for assistance during civil defense emergencies. After the most recent rash of bad weather, including the New Brighton -St. Anthony tornado we were made acutely aware of the need for more reliable means to comm.nicate with each other due to the susceptibility of telephone lines to be damaged during those weather conditions which necessitate our activation. At the present time, there is no radio system within Ramsey County or the State of Minnesota except for police bands that would allow for governmental jurisdictions to communicate during emergencies. Over the past several months the Ramsey County Civil Defense Directors have been discussing with representatives of various county and state agencies the best means to resolve this problem and have established a plan to develop a radio net that would allow civil defense directors and police departments within Ramsey County to intercommunicate with each other during emergencies as well as with the four county Sheriffs surrounding Ramsey County, the State Police Radio Channel, our Fire Departments, and Public Works Departments. Thus, we would for the first time be able to use one radio to coordinate all activities that would more than likely need to be undertaken should a civil defense emergency occur within, the City of Mounds View or should we be called out to assist another community experiencing a civil defense emergency. lie have met with representatives of Ramsey County who have agreed to sponsor before the County Board a budgetary request in the amount of $8,000.00 to place a repeater station at a water tower located in the City of Little Canada at a cost of approximately $8,000.00. This repeater station is necessitated in order for us to be able to obtain the broad coverage necessary to communicate with all of the organizations we desire to communicate with. Attached to this memorandum is a proposed draft of a letter from Mayor McCarty to Ramsey County Commissioner Orth endorsing the County funding of a repeater station and requesting his support on this matter. MAYOR AND CITY COUNCII. ouroHER 8, 19114 PAGE: 'rwu In order for the City of Mounds View to par.Lake of this sytem it would be necessary that the City purchase one or more radios containing sufficient channels and programmable to communicate with all of the agencies involved. Through the Ramsey County Emergency Services Communications Unit the City is able to obtain a radio designed to meet these needs at dealer's prices thus saving the City several hundred dollars as compared to that which we presently pay for other City police and pubLic works radios. In discussing this matter with Police Chirf Ramacher who will assume the duties of Civil Defense Director at the first of the y,:ar, it is our desire to initially purchase one of these radios with all of the equipment necessary for it to serve as both a mobile radio and a base station and should it meet our expectations to purchase one or more additional radios for placement in appropriate City vehicles and at City Hall for purposes of providing us with the necessary communication network during emergency conditions. The cost of the radio plus equipment necessary to make it a base station as well as a mobile unit would require the expenditure of approximately $550.00 plus Staff time to install this radio. It is our proposal that the base station equipment be placed at the Police Department in order that the radio might be used during the normal course of the Police Department's activities and that the mobile unit equipment be placed in my personal vehicle where I might be able to use the radio during emergencies when communications with me are necessary. In discussing this possibility with Councilmember Linker he indicated the desire that the equipment be placed in a City vehicle having appropriate markings to indicate that a City official is using the vehicle and present at the scene. After giving this matter consideration, I would have to agree with Councilmember Linke that having the radio in a vehicle identified as a Municipal Vehicle would be appropriate, however, at the time of a civil defense emergency I could easily imagine the demand that will be placed on our Municipal Vehicles by City Staff that will be called out during such emergencies and require appropriate transportation to accomplish their tasks. As I am presently receiving a vehicle allowance that would result in my using my personal vehicle during a civil defense emergency, having the hook-up in my car would allow me to communicate with appropriate City departments and other agencies during an emergency. Should the need to identify my vehicle as a Municipal Vehicle come about, City stickers could be temporarily placed on my car doors, however, I do not feel that that will necessarily occur. opkk MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OCTOBER 8, 1984 PACE THREE. RECOMMENDATION: Staff would recommend Council approval of the submittal of the proposed letter to County Commissioner Orth and expenditures of funds in the amount of $550.00 for the purchase of a Wilson WH251616 Channel Radio with equipment necessary to use this radio as both a base station and mobile unit. cif of VoRig ie RA,45E Y COUNTY, MINNESOTA 2401111GHWAY 10 MOUNDS VIEW, MINN 55112 7e&3055 October 8, 1984 Commissioner Robert J. Orth Ramsey County Court House St. Paul, Minnesota 55102 Dear Commissioner orth: During the St. Anthony/New Brighton tornado of this past spring inter -city and county communications for mutual aid purposes were negligible. Telephone systems were out of order and existing radio channels were jammed with traffic or lacking common frequencies. Most communications were conducted by driving from one command post to another causing unacceptable delays in the conduct of emergency activities. This was especially true during the first few hours of the crisis. Over the past several months the Ramsey County Civil Defense Directors Association has discussed this severe limitation to our abilities to provide emergency services and have agreed to procure standardized radio equipment in order that inter -city and county communications can be conducted during times of local emergencies. What is needed to tie these radio systems together and provide the clarity and range required for the system is a county owned and operated repeater station as proposed by the Ramsey County Office of Emergency Services. It is our understanding that this proposal will be coming before the Finance Committee and the County Board during the month of October. We would request your favorable consideration of this program so that the various cities in Ramsey County can procure and set up the radio devices necessary for their portion of this important inter -city and county communications system. Your support of our desire to improve emergency services capabilities within Ramsey County would be greatly appreciated. very truly yours, CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW Duane W. McCarty Mayor. 6el� RESOLUTION NO.1819 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION TO FRANK GABRYSH FOR COMMUNITY INTEREST ABOVE AND BEYOND THE CALL OF DUTY WHEREAS, Frank Gabrysh, a man of fortitude and perseverence, has regularly attended meetings of the Mounds View Ccuncil for more years than either he or knowledgeable individuals can remember; and WHEREAS, during this unknown period of time Frank Gabrysh has seen the comings and goings of many elected and appointed officials and issues; and WHEREAS, Frank Gabrysh has remained undaunted in his desire to be an informed resident of the City of Mounds View; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of the City of Mounds View to recognize Frank Gabrysh for his unflagging devotion to his cause. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mounds View on behalf of the citizens of Mounds View expresses its heartfelt appreciation to Frank Gabrysh for his devotion and loyalty to the City of Mounds View. Adopted this 22nd day of October, 1984. ATTEST: Mayor Duane McCarty Councilmember Blanchard -Councilmember Doty Councilmember Hankner Councilmember Linkkee (SEAL) — ---- - - ^C1erk-Administrator Pauley jrvv-,�,, `5 MEMO TO: Clerk -Administrator and City Council I/ FROM: Director of Public Works/Community Developmer / DATE: October 4, 1984 SUBJECT: WELL NO. 3 PILOT PLANT PHASE I, SERCO LABORATORIES'BILLS As you may know, Well No. 3 Pilot Plant Study, Phase I, was conducted by SERCO Laboratories. The work was done under a Not to Exceed Contract of $4,500.00. In June of 1984 Serco submitted their report to the City for review and in July they submitted a bill of $2,300.00 which brought their total billings to $6,663.69. They did not notify me that they were going to exceed the budget or ask for an increase in the contract price. My first impression was to pay them the $4,500.00 and find another laboratory to conduct additional studies. However, there ace some extenuating circumstances where I feel that they are eligible for payment in excess of the $4,500.00 contract. The problems are mechanical failure of the City's equipment, including part of the pilot plant which is owned by the City. The mechanical failures are as �^^ follows: 1. The City's chemical feed pump failed and was subsequently repaired. 2. The air compressors failed twice during the study and were repaired. Staff notifed Serco Laboratories as soon as these failures occurred. Staff repaired the chemical feed pump as well as the compressors, but the filter run was interupted and Serco Labs had to start the filter run again. I have negotiated this issue with SERCO Labs. We have come to an agreement that I feel is equitable. I said that I would ask the City Council to approve an increase of $900.00 in the Phase I contract. Therefore, the total cost of Well No. 3 Pilot Plant Phase I will be $5,400.00. Therefore, I request your approval to increase the contract for Well No. 3 Pilot Plant, Phase I, work to $5,400.00. The justification for this increase is mechanical failure of City equipment. SWT/bc MEMO TO: Clerk -Administrator and City Council I �J FROM: Director of Public Works/Community Developmen DATE: October 10, 1984 SUBJECT: SCRAP/SURPLUS WATER METERS The City owns approximately 200 scrap/surplus Corad brand residential water meters. The water meters were removed from houses during the meter maintenance program. They are using valuable storage space and I feel the time is right to sell them. Water Products Company has offered the City $1.50 per meter or approximately $300.00 for all the meters. Davies Water Equipment Company has indicated to me that they do not want the water meters at any price. Schwartzman & Sons of Anoka, scrap metal dealers, have offered $0.40 per pound for clean cast brass. Their total offer is calculated as follows: $0.40 per pound x 3.5 founds per meter x 200 meters = $280.00 The problem with this offer is that in order to deliver clean ` cast brass to Schwartzman & Sons, the City must remove the non -brass parts from each meter. The cost for this procedure is calculated as follows: 15 minutes per meter x 200 meters + by 60 minutes per hour x $10.76 per hour = $538.00 Therefore, I recommend that the City declare approximately 200 Corad meters surplus and sell them to Water Products Company for $1.50 per meter or approximately $300.00. SWT/bc .sZ6� 2 MEMO TO: Clerk -Administrator and City Council FROM: Director of Public Works/Community Development DAT(i: October 11, 1984 SUBJECT: ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN/ASSISTANT BIIILDING INSPECTOR POSITION The full-tiri Planning Technician position for the City of Mounds View has been vacant since the end of March, 1994, with the leaving of Frank Kampel for other employment. Due to the City's M.S.A. project, a part-time technician was hired by the name of Brian Hoffman for the purposes of conducting the necessary drafting and inspection work for the M.S.A. project. The M.S.A. project is nearly completed and due to the heavy work load presently in my department and additional needs that will be necessary with the adjustment of the Foreman position, it is now apparent that we will definitely need a full-time Engineering Technician. Also due to the realignment of the Foreman position, building inspection duties will also be necessary and will be done by the Planning Technician,. Therefore, I recommend that we hire Brian Hoffman as a full-time employee to fill the position of Engineering Technician/ -- Assistant Building Inspector. Upon giving you this recommendation I would just like to make note to you that Brian Hoffman, in the M.S.A. project, performed a wide variety of duties which included drafting plans, assisting in the preparation of specifications, supervising and inspecting the contractors involved in the project, assisting in managing and completing the final checklist and completion of the project in its entirety. These duties brought Brian into contact with not only the contractors but also the public involved with the project. His involvement with both parties proved to be very successful and well handled in reducing conflicts and potential problems that could arise with such a project. Therefore, I feel confident that Brian can perform, on a full-time basis for the City of Mounds, the duties that we are outlining for him to do. I have reviewed the engineering budget and projected that by year's end we will be approximately $3,400 over budget. This $3,400 deficit is due to primarily to three reasons which are as follows: 1. The payment of over -time and vacation to Frank Kampel upon his leaving. 2. The extraction of $1,500 from the budget for the Energy Coordinator position. 3. My employment with the City and our contractual agreement superseded what. had initially had been budgeted for 1983. Clerk -Administrator and City Council Page. Two October 11, 1984 I would, however note to you at this time that due to the savings of the Foreman position and excesses in the Water Administration, Water Operation, Sewer Administration and Sewer Operation budgets that they can adequately cover the shortage of the Engineering Department. The combined surpluses of these accounts exceed $8,000 projected throughout the end of the year. Further, building permit revenues may nearly double what we had projected. I, therefore, recommend that Brian Hoffman become a full-time employee effective -October 11, 1984 (Brian's 120th day of employment ended on the loth and therefore it becomes necessary that he become full-time after that date if the City should consider his full-time employment). I also recommend that his base rate of pay be $9.00/hour ($1,560/month or $18,720/year) with full benefits and that he be given vacation and sick leave accruing from the start of his employment with the City in April, 1984. Lastly, that after completion of his six month probationary period he oe given a 48 pay increase in 1985. These items have been discussed with Mr. Hoffman and he is aareeable to these terms. It is my intention now, should the Council agree with my recommendation, that we also put into operation the Foreman position with Mr. Steve Rose starting December 1st of this year. Both Steve and myself will be available at your work session meeting on Monday to discuss this matter and the Foreman position should you have any questions. I am having Steve available at the meeting to assist in answering any questions about Brian because Steve has worked closely with Brian on zoning and building matters to date and agrees with my recommendation of making Brian a full-time employee. Lastly, attached is a copy of the Stanton Metropolitan Cities Survey for the Engineering Technician position and Building Inspector with the City's of equal size highlighted for your review. I look forward to discussing this matter further with you on Monday evening. Thank you. /bc Attachment X oNumlb . w %Ill IIRI ill -ton ntulnm tau watt' lrrh+ml lrwnim rIu thin to five ,rare' inicel lillnt [EIIIERIE AIM III emrima In nvermet mllnrriN veil, IASKU01 OA D NSCIIF1101 - Job IMI"I field or offire dllrn, toch at drafpm, turvlvirt, samba or swfrw{im oust e mail sumo Rah. Atmlunl Intmrnts, tars senurnmta Icrn Rate, and elan drunnit fro mlrnnlallom of fide Rain. AN - Party Chills Ir, that sailer riih of favmel in be rerortid titre. All man oalyd melhlv. 1 0.vla A A Slah ml to Atrtim Fee ...... w.N we 1/001501 I000 1700 II00 11101 2000 2100 280 2300 2400 3uriwitlie [el SSIIN 50 054 ON 056 051 1 51 050 050 050 050 050 lhim 0/1 )rile — ....................................._..............................._.._...._.._..._.._...__....__... _.. ....................................... Slate of AlRanch 511 .............................. 2111 2 Uiwrlily of Almosola 11 MII I NMI 2117 Acrcnin Costar 31 249F Aese Canto A 2114 Alrmanlls 31 2113 It, Pal 10 M11 NMI 2314 Anoh Costly 0 1311 SrsAlala Canty A 2171 Sall Canty 11101 Adiuslml Pedima CAMP Cash 1 1172 FEAR! 2175 �...._ ..__.. _ [dim _..._ 3 ................. ....... 2011 Irod)r, Park 2 1271 1 1 St. lab Park 3 1731 Aireetarki 2 1701 2 lumsville 1 1117 1 Amarillo 7 212 Pilo* 1 2132 SWIM Color 1 2075 DtIa1, 1 nn Nam 1 IV 1 wrlrnal 5 M4 Na kwA 1 IIN ■16 ban Lb 11111 AdHslvml Wins) rue I till Aule arm 2 20M South St. nut I 2059 Colalla Minks I I93t Imr 6m wills 1 IIR Film fraww 5 lilt I 1 nnmwwncmmnmwslwwmosma Am Aeu Iawlevih (relwiRa Iawvily) lit eevlleallr) It. of Tit to 6.41 7n to Ain An Sim Au Ile: Sim An ........... ............................................................................. •RanmRanmmnwnmmemwmwmraramw 1 21 IS M 41123 1 1 [mimerim Aide Sr.11re Tech Sr. 1710 2147 9 7 7 0 1 trircirrl [mimrim Assistnl 1517 "_WI 3 30 1 1 5mler frufnnriN locinicie 2012 2111 f 1.5 2521 11 15 1 2 1 1 1 tralmrlm Terinitie III I125 2307 7 5 2511 2 IS ]I I I Amflnnsa m[nlimrins Aide 11 U% 2ID 7 A 230 3 21 ] 5 1 2 1 1 IrcMicie II Draftee 11 11% 2W 1 5 ro 0 3 ................................... 1 WiMrrrm Wrawle III 15 _ ....._...._._�... :3 0- I 1 1 1 1 [Mimi InMwie Ill 1112 2112 1 1 221, 2 12 1 [mimerlm Tech 11 2 2 1 1 Sr. [msmrim rnlstititn 1512 MIL A 1 --_..__.._._._....---.._.._._.._....._..____..._.._.__.__.. 7 ...................... Imlme lot Aide Ill 1111 2nt ; _3.. �_ 1 Gtimrim Tech. 11 1531 1743 3 1 Inrimerim Irclnicie 11 1573 2011 1 1 [miatrim TecMitim 11 ISO 1701 1 1 1 Fminrrlm TnMitim III I571 M01 A 5 I I 1[mimrim Tnlnicloi ICI 2234 2 2 1 1 [nllmrinA Aido-Fro*t I Sornv 1515 2750 I 1 I Icfireerial TMnirim III 1113 .11% 9 2 1 [nfinwim TaA.i [Miteaim Aide 1707 271 1 [Mimrim ImM)cie 11 1471 I647 3 2 1 1 1 2 1 1[nfiMrrinA TrcMitie 1711 2182 1 1 2111 1 It I 1 Cmimrim Aide III 1 [uimriM Teclniviel III I tmlmilm Aide lit I 1 1 Iwftvenal 7rowtl Co rditialor 1 I 1 [nlimtim Itch III 1730 IMF 1 1 1 1 InelMeflM InMiclai Ill 1704 1939 1 2 I 1 1 [nflrecria Aide Ill 171.1 I142 2 1 I I i 1 ImIrc111M Aide Ill flilmn: LM III (CMUI W) Job As. Is All epos raid a402m. laamppmmpamuminmmmupuoltopamnmpmn nnlr.; nuwpinpplmnlrnnnuomm�mnuumuuuamemmunalutpnmatmmnn4putmmtmmntrmman late Arun tarrvlly T 6.11 Rpm 140150 1100 1700 IMO I100 " 2100 2200 2100 20 Iextudln liniments) (if wlittt JurIMltllal Start In to 0t.of irA too �1 Aken >• 0 51 0 >0 0 SO t M ISO 1 30 050 050 IS) 150 Ufan I7I Itl11 •• Ain Ma Slen An la sten An p114 W m11pN01tmt1111p/p11p11tp111tta1t11tt11pltNlln Il llll lllllllltltl tt IttltltltllUllt1117111111tUdtlttnitllllpillmp IllttlmmtttUt141ppintllnl t11pt1I11tIppn11mm10pllnppm lamtw I IW 1 t 1 Wimtin Atilt III IqI IM7 BWeree 1 i74 Ardllt )Itllds 1 IEI I I 1 Winer lethsiein II _ 170t^224 �1 7 TEAM 2m 1 Tninerin Technician III mitlltitplttlttlmt11111plplltlmtlttlllllittll lltllittllllltll (tllllittittlitltl ttltt111ittlnitltlllnpltUllptlt1111nI111tntltllltltttllitlpltlltltp11111t11it111111(Illlltlllltlllll lltittltl litlitnll 1 5 F 2 1 30 1 U 27 d5121 7 1 1 ll A 11 TOTALS! 177 211e 2147 2147 7147 Nal 01 Portion Is 1021 MATTO MY MIA Jut Ike is Aiddie S01 of Au.ot Han 601n Pries Lul. Salon Salon itvm, Peke Prm I[IPO Sim 411") in 2111 2147 2147 - 2111 ISee Above) - Priwle Indnln Ilnn Cites) Ip Aarrmsnlalive Caresnsn 0mrn Outten a similar skill level 201 Ifil Ins 110/ - 2N1 lr)nicinr a sisilor dill Inrl 2111 21" MRS IRA$ - 27p - Federal lorernml (Nationwide; late We for similar utM in 0-5 1152 - Iln aM 65-7. 1420 - Ip1 SKILL LM I • Inlwtiml oova Imlrllu Ibl wIRt11 1 It Im W t111111101 NIflmlfd ilrlttwil, alpinist, rildlt"I w! Whim end /IAAr to". OtSlllfloll - Jab WWII InWrtllm of stst I, wit N NI follwln11M11 of Wilrst tie - trllnll Md ukloaturrll flatim, 111d1"t IN NM11111n11 pilot W IMP Infrll, 11111f It11 Winne, M11111 Ir IW.o bd Illn,lbl to Ind 0110111111m of w1pi M110"1 iwl. IOIt • Ift"tlro vast in sale 1 edlwtaw d nild lit" en w111N the IN lumu .. +o.:Aw Idlasl litlll INltl/ f/n I11Nl Plwlbdl MIIIIMI III1111t111 1 Ullm Ao 1 WmI Is Onillw An all utes "lad ImlAit. ARM Am I7w I; If 17 11 I7 It II m 11 I? :1 71 A 71 71 :1 fl N 11 )f AINNRtiw fail soUn A A 1 0 1 1 1 A 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 Ill 1 1 IUIo pl Iltb •• 111411i110 low 111111"w ls"wnll 4w11111N Ilmwllt) IIA wlltlllel Il,ff In to 11,11 tit to AIR MI File IS @u Ilwe MI W YY W I I I NI II I R I I I I I I I I I II OR/R/IRIWIIIIR111RRRRIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIeIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIRYNRNN......RRY.m..um.,nmrn..nn..• ........ Iu 1 1 dU"I (do IMorltn. :Mt W I It State of AIRdwU Ud/aRdf Uon lll wle It 1 1N5 I I 7n7 I 1 U iterRlo Iolrnlor fill ". Jw. IIN: All _.............................................................................. _ ... ..._...__.»....._ Mlre U/U Ca, 10 ..............._.................................................................. "I I f 1 I _......... ........ 1 1 twilNllio IevRbr I 111 flit 1114 II II NMI 22U �..._.__..._. n Alleolif ........... 71 ..........................................,........... . ......".._....._...............................................,.......................................... Ill 1 1 I 1 1 J If 1 II 1 ,. 1 ... IN/R4t IUllood 11A .71 11 If let. f II It. Pool 11 3171 1 11 IJ 1 1 illlolfler lllrlwel KAIII 7/2 _............................................................................................ _ ......... _. _._................................................................................................. Stott CWtW 1 1$50 1 Ivild1"f Affltill III: Ull 11 Cam tanlW 1 2071 1 1 1 intenler lilt Ill? I I I(NI fill ....».. .... ................................................................. lleellnotw 1 ............................................................................................................................ 7NI I I 1 1 InlRttar IV111MI :Ill :4.11 1 L5 :111 f I film 1 Nil I Imperler IIU 7011 1 1 INAIM Fork 1 NJI i I I 1 luildinl ImlKlor IMI 1111 It. twit Put 1 1111 1 1 I 11 1 WlldNl liffta InirRlu I I It Illl f105 11 11 ARn1tR/a 1 fill I I 7 1 1 1 Im uclar leltlwl) 154e -m 11 11 ARAIuld 1 All I I Inlewler • IlRliltoi Ill# f117 2547 J Cede eolb 1 AC1 I I I lid. Wetted It, IIL ImrMlt f111 NO lurnlrllle J 1111 1 1 filtocliR I"uwllf fl lilt 244! : 1 Illlalle I fell i 1 Cale Inrlrownl offltlr W flit d PIt11utk I If" 11 I Nlldim ImeN11t 1111 flfl lrWlw Cwwr I fill I I Inutt11f1 fwrwtal•1111, ahttll 1111 7501 11 11 film 1 11N I I I Pluline I"4RI,1 lwlrw, Iffliff Ill? Nl? lima I no I I 1 be wiul lllwout 1 Mlldild Nflnd IIA 'Of fa An 1 1 I J 211 I It opimm trw111 I I list )NI I Asti. pill, I"IlRlll on lwl I 2Ml I I IRIdlne Nf111111 WON IIw SN 15 7 :1 II deathVill" I fill I 1 fnvRlet II I111 1N7 1 1 f11: film J it" I I east Plot Nhtioll nIMiN IIR Role bill 1 left I I I ImeRilll ��t R• 4 w ,ti a IN w 0% PI 44$1 a qs 0 0 A w011 I oil 1omm - LAW I lCmtirudi hA k. 20 All Win uW WILbly. amrrtmmluutunaanunnanmmnon uummmuul m aw uunnu uuu uun nm nutnuntuunumll utunutl/Illtutltlnaln/aauunuuauamuummumuaunrounm Rite law Lamavlty btle4laien k.ef Ibm I.'00 I7 11 15 11 17 II II 20 21 22 21 21 25 26 27 21 29 70 11 12 leacludiM laurvitvf [if Minable) [rl Alan O O O O P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 Nam o/r Title •• lb.of Iri to Ao.of Tn to mmammtnlaUatlliivamlantlllllttl11II1t11iatllllltlllilittlltllllitittlttltt/111rIIIIttItUl/111t1/11lllltllfItt11t11tIt11t11It11illllinAlltllltlllll/IllinRIlitlAn Sins W Aix Sins 1 itIit 3e6111 St. /aW I Ida Columbia (bights 1 1751 I I 1 1 Ncurinf Inrnlor 1620 1929 5 1 Rest St. pall 1 23a 1 1 1 AtllStanl loildin lnwolor 15/1 I771 1 2 Imp Net bights 2 7712 2 Sr. 2eclalH&VINulldint Ivector 1915 2710 5 1 Llrn 9tlirll d 21" I l l 2 1 1 Irwntor ltYrMtalt Aildinl 2012 T12 2 1 ArALm 1 flu I a ImlrLof Lakeville 2 tea 1 A 1 lwtclat flu 2171 5 3.5 rz 7 20 Slillw4r 1 174 1 Inrnter RlwbIrd;bjldhdl 1764 2711 kefun 1 IUI I billlnA lmsnr for U: 2229 Axlctnt loildim official IS51 1172 2 White bights 1 2751 1 lurldinA Official arm 1 2011 I Cody tnforaocnt Offiar Ent "1 1 1117 1 1 Inrerter Ybuit bights 2 2111 2 Uldint Inrnlar lt4 Clr 1 2161 I IIN. Irr.1 rear Coforannl off. na 240 A 2 RIM 2091 Ccdr Coforaenl Offfar 1712 TIM 1 1 Itgmptlgltitmltatnalnlr1111tItIttlltit1111ittltitl111111t11111tIi1111itt111tltitltlllitlt111111tItltltt1l11ittl1rlm111UltltllAtll/t111Ulinllllt/tllllll initl/1I/Iil ittlllittlinlititt IIIAII TOTALS; I I 1 5 1 1 11 11 21 12 22 II 21 A 12 1 II 12 70d fl15 2210 2527 10n Aran of WIM of 1921 MAID Seim MTA Job br 20 go "liable wnry rwarlm are wuiablo. MEMO '1'0: Clerk -Administrator and City Council PROM: Building Inspector DATE: October 11, 1984 SUBJECT: NEW BRIGHTON STATE BANK The New Brighton State Bank is requesting approval to provide additional parking spaces that become necessary due to heavy weekend and holiday parking needs for their drive-in facility at Red Oak Drive and Bighway 10. Attached is a sketch which shows the 21 new spaces they intend on providing. The new parking spaces provided would be paved as well as having a perimeter of V6-18 concrete curbing. The additional parking and paving area may require additional ponding of which the bank, will provide pending our final calculations of that. Due to the fast closing fall season, the bank requests that they be able to complete this. prior to the bituminous companies closing down for the winter. The Planning Commission has not seen this proposal yet but will at their workshop meeting on October 17, 1984. Due to the noncontroversial aspect of the parking proposal, staff would request that the bank be authorized to proceed with the parking pending review by the Planning Commission on October 17th. The proposed additional parking facilities falls within all code requirements by the City and actually is itended to provide them with better customer service. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please feel free to contact me at my office. Thank you. SAR/bc RESOLUTION NO. 1820 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION COMMENDING MATT ROWLEY FOR ACHIEVING EAGLE SCOUT STATUS WHEREAS, Matt Rowley has worked hard and diligently to meet the requirements for the Eagle Scout Badge; and WHEREAS, having successfully completed those requirements Matt Rowley was awarded the highest honor a Boy Scout can receive, the Eagle Scout Badge, in a special ceremony on October 10, 1984; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mounds View on behalf of the residents of Mounds View commends and congratulates Matt Rowley for the significant accomplishment of being named an Eagle Scout. Adopted this 22nd day of October, 1984. ATTEST: Mayor Duane McCarty Councilmember Blanchard Councilmember Doty Councilmember Hankner Councilmember Linke (SEAL) Clerk-Administrafor Pauley a F�k,`QA�'. UT Vj PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA September 24, 1984 Regular Meeting Mounds View City Hall 2401 Hwy. 10, Mounds View, MN 55112 -----------------------....------------------------------------------------- The Mounds View City Council was called to order by Mayor McCarty at 7:30 PM on September 24, 1984. The Pledge of Allegiance was said. MEMBERS PRESENT: Councilmpxibers Linke, Hankner, Blanchard, Doty and Mayor McCarty. ALSO PRESENT:City Attorney Meyers, Finance Director Brager a a Public Works/Community Development Director Thatcher. Moti138 on/Second: Doty/Hankner to approve the August minutes as corrected. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion/Second: Linke/Hankner to approve the September m nutes as presented. 5 ayes 0 nays Russell Warren, 8044 Greenwood Drive, stated that on September 20, the local DFL had sent a letter to Police Chief Ramacher, with carbon copies sent to the Council and Mayor, and Gary Quick and Clerk/ Administrator Pauley, regarding an election billboard sign for Duane McCarty at Highway 10 and Edgewood, which violates the election sign statutes. He noted that Mr. Quick had been advised by Mayor McCarty that a sign he had put up earlier had to be taken down as it was also in violation, and asked when Mayor McCarty's sign would be removed. Attorney Meyers reviewed Ordinance No. 39, covering e election signs. He explained that a violation would be a criminal offense under the code, and enforcement would be the issuance of complaints by the proper officials, and then the case may proceed to court. 1. Call to Order 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Roll Call 4. Approval of Minutes: August 27, 1984 Sept. 10, 1984 Motion Carried Motion Carried 5. Residents Requests and Comments from the Floor Mounds View City Council September 24, 1984 Regular Meeting --Pay----- ----------------------- Mayor McCarty explained he had received a complaint about Mr. Quick putting his signs up too early, and had passed that along to Mr, Quick. Ile also stated he had not been formally cited at this time, and if he is, he will hand the citation to Naegle, the owner of the billboard in question. Attorney Meyers advised that the letter that was received could not be considered a formal complaint, and the billboard company should be advised it is in violation of the ordinance. Motion/Second: Hankner/Linke to notify Naegle that the sign at Highway 10 and Edgewood is in violation of the City Ordinance. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Mayor McCarty stated he would like a formal opinion from Attorney Meyers that this is a vio- lation, and he wants a clear definition in the ordinance of the difference between billboard signs and electioneering signs. Attorney Meyers advised that he feels the sign in question is a violation of the ordinance. Dennis Petrini asked Councilmember Hankner whether she had written circulated a petition regarding the ILS at the airport. Councilmember Hankner replied she had not. Mr. Petrini asked Councilmember Linke if he circulated a petition. Councilmember Linke velnnteered stated that he had not been out campaigning en-iH#s-#s:ne at all. Mr. Petrini read a prepared statement, giving his personal feelings on the position he feels certain Councilmembers had taken on the airport issue. Councilmember Hankner explained to Mr. Petrini that she has stated it many times before, and will say it again, that sire does not want an intermediate airport and has been an advocate; for a minor use airport. She also pointed out that Mr. Petrini was nowhere around during the 1983 Legislative session when the issued was discussed at length, nor had he been present at the many Council meetings where it has been discussed until March or April of this year. Councilmember Hankner explained to Mr. Petrini what she feels the process has been to date on the airport. She stated that while she does not want the Master Plan, there are some items in it that are saleable. i Mounds view City Council September 24, 1984 Regular Meeting Pjr;e Throe ------------------------------------------------------------ Counciimember Linke clarified his position for Mr. Petrini on the airport issue, to correct Mr. PeLrini's mistaken comments on Councilmember Linke's stand. Mayor McCarty stated the t'ty has an estimate of a approximately $100,000 to and their lawsuit, and it is his personal feeling rh t it could be paid for without any additional tax s, and could be taken from defleeenee defeaseance. Hr. stated he feels it would be a good investment, and -.hay must decide what the limit is to be. Councilmember Doty stated :here is $180,000 in the contingency fund that he 'gels could be used to cover the costs. Councilmember Hankner explained the process she feels the City has gone through in the past year and she also stated how important; it is to not reveal all the strategy they have planner., as it could be used against them in court, with MAC hhving an advantage of knowing what the City had planned. Due to the heated comments and accusations being made, a recess was taken. Upon calling back to order, Attorney Meyers reveiwed the history of the airport situation and stated that several questionnaires have been received back that will be used to prepare affidavits toward injunctions, as a basis for obtaining restraining orders as well as notifying the FAA and Congressmen that the City has specific concerns and questions, Motion/Second: McCarty/Doty that the Council be on record as standing opposed to the current Master Plan for the Anoka County Airport, reserving runway place- ment and configurations for future consideration. 2 ayes 2 nay 1 abstention Motion Failed Councilmember Blanchard stated she refused to vote on the motion as she feels it has become a totally political issue at City Hall and she has stated her views on the airport innumerable times before. Councilmember Linko stated he was not opposed to the movement of the north/south runway to the north, as they already have people with irrepairable damage from where it is presently located, and leaving it where it is will cause them nothing but further harm. Mayor McCarty stated his intent is to oppose the current Master Plan but still ,cold true to the belief that the runway be moved north. Councilmember Hankner stated she agrees with Council - member Linke, and that in passing this Mounds View City Council���.oj W. September 24, 1984 Regular Meeting Page Four -------------------------------------------------------------------------- type of motion, would not allow the flexibility to proceed with the lawsuit. She also pointed out the Council is unified in proceeding with the lawsuit, but the Councilmembers have different beliefs on how to proceed, She added that she would personally favor a motion to proceed with the law,iit. Councilmember Doty stated he is oppo: 1 to the current Master Plan, and he agrees w-6h the importance of moving the runway. Councilmember Doty stated he demander -.hat Council - member Blanchard vote. Councilmember anchard cast her vote as present. ounc mem er -Inke stated he would ur ild Councilmembe: Blanchard's abstention he feels it should be up to each Councilmember to „te their consience, Attorney Meyers reviewed the ordinance and advised it would require a mandatory injunction to make a Councilmember vote. Alice Fritz, 8072 Long Lake Road, asked why the ordinance regarding no alcohol consumption in the City parks was not being enforced. She also stated she had heard the Park and Rec Commission and Festivities Commission were planning a beer garden for the next Festival in the Park. Mark Mack, 4068 Glenhaven, stated that he was a member of the Festivities Commission and they had taken no action on it yet but were considering it due to budget problems. Mayor McCarty directed Staff to send a letter to all organizations using the City parks, citing the ordinance. Paul Ritelle, 3989 Central Avenue NE, Minneapolis, stated he was the attorney for Greg Johnson, and asked the Council if they would consider reaching a pretrial settlement, before the scheduled court date of October 8. He explained he and his client feel they have an excellent chance to win in court, but want to avoid incurring futher costs and the anger of the neighborhood over the use of the property. He stated Mr. Johnson was willing to agree to not sell his property to anyone who would intend to rezone for commercial purposes, and the sold use would be the continued operation on a limited basis of the Highway 10 Radiator Shop, and they would erect a fence to separate them from the residential property owners. He added that Mr. Johnson would also agree to continuing his operation on a conditional basis, under a CUP. Mounds View City Council `,' „ :. "' September 24, 1984 Regular hleetinu" -- Page Five ----------------------------- ------- - Mayor McCarty stated he feels the basic question goes back to the Planning Commission recommendation, which was from what the Council acted. He added that the Council would take the request under advisement. Carol Welte, Darrell-WelkeT 8045 Groveland, questioned what the property was when Mr. Johnson purchased it. Mayor McCarty replied it was single family residential. Motion/Second: McCarty/Doty to take the presenta- c on to the council on the Highway 10 Radiator Shop under advisement and notify the proper staff members. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Russell Paul, 7940 Greenfield Avenue, asked when the ordinance went into effect for the signs and billboards. Attorney Meyers replied he did not have the exact date with him, but it was several years ago, Motion/Second: Linke/Hankner to approve the -agenda the reading 6. Approval of Consent Agenda consent as presented and waive - of the resolutions. Motion Carried 5 ayes 0 nays Mayor McCarty closed the regular meeting and opened 7. Public Hearing: Delinquent the public hearing at 8:50 PM. Utility Accounts Finance Director Brager explained the process used as delinquent and in determing these accounts levying the tax. Mayor McCarty closed the public hearing and reopened the regular meeting at 8:52 PM. Motion/Second: Doty/Hankner to approve Resolution o, an waive the reading. Motion Carried 5 ayes 0 nays Bill Fritz stated the budget looks good to him, and fund 8. Public Discussion of 1985 Budgets asked some questions regarding the contingency and interest earned. Mayor McCarty and the Council explained the process used in preparing the budget. . Mounds View City Hall ,13 ;�rp, ��� � September 24, 1984 6 , 9 �1 'r� i L " Regular Meeting 4•• � r ' � Page Six -------- 1-1i/ [ _ I__i_� S.F �tt..4� ------------------------ ---------------- ---- Motion/Second: Linke/Hankner to approve Resolution 9. Considerati� fro, an waive the reading. of Resoluti, No. 1796 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Motion/Second: Blanchard/Dot to approve Resolution 10. Consideration No. an waive the readin of Resolution No. 1797 No vote was taken on the above motion, as the following amendment was made. Notion/Second: McCarty/Hankner to amend the previous motion, to approve Resolution No. 1797, minus the capital expenditures contained in the 1985 long term financial plan. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Motion/Second: Doty/Linke to approve Resolution No. H. Consideration an waive the reading. of Resolution No. 1794 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carz� Motion/Second: Doty/Hankner to approve Resolution 12. Consideration o. an waive the reading. of Resolution No. 1795 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Motion/Second: McCarty/Hankner to table Resolutions 13. Consideration R37-79T—an-T1793. of Resolutions No. 1792 and 5 ayes 0 nays 1793 Motion Carried Park Director Anderson reviewed the proposed budget 14. Consideration for the aquatics director for 1984-85. of Aquatics Director 1984-85 Councilmember Linke expressed concern over the Contract percentage proposed for the aquatic director versus other city employees for a salary increase, as well as a reduction in hours. Park Director Anderson explained it was an 11% increase, and clarified the hour reduction. Mayor McCarty pointed out she has nearly department head status responsibility and this was a new program and she had been at a low salary. Mounds View City Council Regular Meeting �Id w+ p i 4 : p September 24, 1984 ---------------------- Page Seven -- ---------------------------------------------- Motion/Second: McCarty/Doty to approve the memo- randum o un erstanding between Mounds View and Maureen Thelen for the duties of parttime aquatics director, as presented September 24, 1984 with the deletion of #7 on page 3 of the contract, and authorize the Clerk/Administrator and Mayor to execute the contract. 5 ayes 0 nays Al Perez presented his proposal to the Council to be an airport noise control consultant. Attorney Meyers advised residents have volunteered their yards for measuring sound levels. Mr. Perez stated he would be willing to include the monitoring in the $7,000 bid. Motion/Second: Doty/Blanchard to approve the pro- ppose contract from Northern Sound at the rate of hour, not to exceed $7,000, with the budgeted amount identified from the contingency. 5 ayes 0 nays The Council asked that Mr. Perez work with Attorney Meyers in coordinating efforts. *lotion/Second: McCarty/Doty to remove from the Fable Resolution No. 1789. 5 ayes 0 nays Director Thatcher had no report. Councilmember. Linke reported he had attended a Ramsey County League meeting, regarding the Governor's council on tax problems. Councilmember Hankner had no report, Councilmember Blanchard had no report. Councilmember Doty reported he had received the book from the Rice Creek Watershed District on !r` the water resources management plan. Mayor McCarty had no report. Motion Carried 15. Consideration of Resolution No. 1800 Motion Carried Motion Carried 16. Report of Public Works/ Community Dvlpt, Director 17. Reports of Councilmembers Mounds View City CounclkJ ;` 4`�. September 24, 1984 Regular Meeting ilj -- I Y I- - " Page Eight --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Motion/Second: McCarty/Doty to approve Resolution 15A. Consideration No. 1789 and waive the reading. Resolution No. 9 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Attorney Meyers had no report. 17. Report of Attorney Finance Director Brager reported there were two 18. Report of Clerk - copies of the tax study commission report at Administrator City Hall, and will be in the library for anyone who would like to review them. Mayor McCarty stated the Council .tad voted 5-0 in recommending Resolution No. 1588, on March 28, 1983 where they all took a stand on the ILS, and asked for Councilmember Blanchard's vote now. Councilmember Blanchard replied she had not changed her mind. There was further discussion on 'he airport issue, with the Council and Attorney Mears answering questions from the residents present. Russell Pahl accused Councilmember Linke of favoring an intermediate airport. Councilmember Linke restated his position of opposition to the upgrading of the Anoka County -Blaine Airport to anything but a minor status. Motion/Second: Doty/Hankner to adjourn the 19. Adjournment meeting at 9:51 PM. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Respectfully submitted, Donald Brager Acting Administrator r-, 3 PROCEEDINGS OF THE CCPY COUNCIL CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA Special Meeting October 1, 1984 Mounds View City Hall 2401 Hwy, 10, Mounds View MN 55112 ------------------------------------------------------------ The meeting was called to order by 1. Call to Order Mayor McCarty at 9:50 p.m. Motion/Second: Doty moved, Linke seconded to adopt Resolution 1810 Authorizing Submission of the Community Energy Council Grant Application and waived the reading. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Mayor McCarty asked the Council for their direction regarding Resolution No. 1797 which was adopted by the City Council at the September 24, 1984 Regular Meeting approving the 1985 General Fund Budget. His concern was with respect to the provision in the City Council portion of the 1985 General Fund Budget for increases in the City Council's salaries which could not be implemented in 1984 as the ordinance which would be required to be adopted increasing the City Council's salaries could not be adopted prior to the November 5th election. MCCdrLy asked if the City Council wanted to reallocate the money budgeted for Council raises to some other purpose or to the Contingency Fund. Councilmember Hankner slated that she felt that the Resolution should stand as adopted. Councilmember Linke stated his general agreement with this position and suggested that the Resolution stand. Councilmember at 10:00 p.m. Linke. 5 ayes Doty moved to adjourn Seconded by Councilmember 0 nays Motion Carried Re pe t•fully su itted, Don F. Paul y ^ Clerk-Administ ator/