Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packets - 1985/03/11CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW MARCH 11, 1985 7:30 P.M. A G E N D A 1. Call to Order 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Roll Call - Hankner, Quick, Blanchard, Linke 4. Approval of Minutes: February 25, 1985 Regular Meeting 5. Residents Requests and Comments From The Floor -------------------------------------------------------- CITIZENS: BEFORE SPEAKING PLEASE GIVE YOUR FULL NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE MINUTES ----------- --------------------------------- ------------ 6. Approval of Consent Agenda ITEM A. Approve Purchase Of 1985 Ford Crown Victoria from Minar Ford In the Amount of $11,433.84 Per Staff Memorandum Dated February 28, 1985. ITEM B. Approve Membership In the Suburban Area Chamber of Commerce At A Cost of $210 Per Year To Be Charged To Account No. 100-100-4361 ITEM C. Approve Hiring of William Heaton For a Maximum of Sixty -Six (66) Days At $5.50/Hour Commencing Retroactively, February 26, 1985 ITEM D. Set Public Hearing on Proposed Signalization Of Intersection of Highway 10 and Pieasantview Drive For 7:40 P.M. On March 25, 1985 ITEM E. Approve Advertising for a 10:00 A.M. April 12, 1985 Bid Opening For MSA Street Project 1985 ITEM F. Approve Resolution No. 1876 Approving Just And Correct Claims Against City Funds ITEM G. Licenses for Approval Garbage Haulers - Expire 3/31/85 Ace Solid Waste - Renewal Gambling Devices - Expires 3/27/85 Mounds View Lion's Club - New AGENDA MARCH 11, 1985 PAGE TWO 7. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding Hiring Of Community Service Officer 8. Consideration of Resolution No. 1875 Requesting Prohibition of Semi Trailer Truck Traffic On 85th Avenue/County Road J 9. First Reading Of Ordinance No. 386 Amending Ordinance No.319 Granting A Franchise To Group W Cable of the North Suburbs, Inc., A Minnesota Corporation, To Operate And Maintain A Cable Communication System In The City 10. Reports of Public Works/Community Development 11. Report of Attorney 12. Report of Councilmembers - Hnke aer, Quick, Blanchard, 13. Report of Administrator 14. Adjournment I UN 1-1 V r Li 1 , PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA Regular Meeting February 25, 1985 Mounds View City Hall -------------------------2401-Hwy_ 10, Mounds View, MN 55112 ------ -------------------------- The Mounds View City Council was called to order at 1. Call to Order 7:30 PM on February 25, 1985. The Pledge of Allegiance was said. 2. Pledge of Allegiance MEMBERS PRESENT: Councilmembers Hanker and Quick and 3, Roll Call MayorMayor Linke. It was noted that Councilmember Blanchard was on vacation. ALSO PRESENT: Attorney Karney, Clerk/Administrator Mu e—Tan public Works/Co=unity Development Director Thatcher. Motion/Second: Quick/Linke to approve the minutes 4. Approval of o thf a February 11, 1985 meeting as presented, Minutes: 2 ayes 0 nays 1 abstention February 11, 1 Councilmember Hankner abstained from the vote as she Motion Carried had not been present at the February 11 meeting, There were no residents requests or comments from the 5. Residents Re - floor, quests and Comments from the Floor Motion/Second: Hankner/Quick to approve the consent 6. Approval of agent presented and waive the reading of the Consent Agenda resolutions, 3 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried 7inance Director Brager reviewed his memo of February 7. Consideration 20, 1985 regarding a maintenance contract for the of Staff Memo City's dictation equipment Regarding Mete, Areent on After questioning from the Council, Finance Director Dictation Eqpt, Brager reviewed the machines on hand, the use they Mounds View City Council t ��' February 25, 1985 Regular Meeting • • �` Page Two --------------------------------------------------------------------------- fact that they had budgeted a blanket receive, and the amount for all equipment in the office for repairs and maintenance in 1985, which this maintenance agreement could be paid from. Motion/Second: Hankner/Quick to authorize the purchase or a�nance agrii:ji •t on City dictation equipment from Precision Business Systems, Inc, at a cost of no more than $480.00 annually. 3 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Finance Director Brager reviewed that the Finance 8. Reports of Department had worked with the department heads and Department Heads Council to finalize the 1985 budget and long term financial plan. He presented an overhead projection of the breakdown of disbursements of the 1985 property tax levy. Finance Director Brager reviewed the plans for the upcoming special election and the counting of the ballots. They will be having a demo counter in for the special election, and if Staff is pleased with its capabilities and performance, they may be coming back to the Council with a recommendation for purchase in 1986. The Finance Department is working on the year end financial statements and preparing for the audit. There is a part-time accounting clerk on board, who is working 20 hours a week, and is working out well, Microfiche readers and filmers have been purchased for the City, and they are working on filming records. Finance Director Brager will be working with a computer consultant in the near future to study the City's information needs, and hopes to have a recommendation to the Council by August or September, before the budget is approved for 1986. Police Chief Ramacher reviewed 1984 as a whole, briefly, as documented in the yearly report which was issued the previous week. He reported considerable effort had been put into training in 1984. Chief Ramacher presented overhead projections, showing the comparison of the crime rate for 1983 and 1984, with 1984 being down 10.8%. Chief Ramacher reported Sargent Hagen will be retiring in April, and they are in the process of hiring a new officer at this time. Chief Ramacher reviewed his plans for the Police Depart- ment for 1985. Mounds View City Council February 25, 1985 Regular Meeting Page Three --------------------------- ------- - ,----:.�--------------------- Director Thatcher reviewed the activities of the water, sewer and shop departments for the fourth quarter of 1984. He reviewed the number of inspections done by the insppection department, and the number of permits issued by the planning department for 1984, as well as the activities of the Community Development Department for the year. Director Thatcher presented overhead projections, comparing 1983 and 1984 figures for the inspection and planning department, and the increases for the year. Director Thatcher asked Council approval of proposed Resolution No. 1872, in appreciation to Mike Lauterbach for service on the Planning Commission. Motion/Second: Quick/Hankner to approve Resolution No. 7 , a resolution of appreciation to Michael Lauterbach, and waive the reading. 3 ayes 0 nays Director Thatcher asked Council approval of proposed Resolution No. 1873, amending Resolution No. 1859. Motion/Second: Hankner/Quick to approve Resolution No�75, amending Resolution No. 1859 establishing policy guidelines for snow removal from sidewalks and for snow plowing damage to mail boxes, and waive the reading of the resolution. 3 ayes 0 nays Director Thatcher reported Gary Kardell is out for a week with a back injury, and he will be hiring a temporary worker to help out, as needed, and will be bringing the paperwork to the Council at their next meeting. I Attorney Karney reported briefly reviewed the scoping 10. document on the environmental worksheet and stated that he will be preparing a written document for the next agenda session. He recommended that someone from the Council attend the hearing in Blaine on March 6 and represent the City. Attorney Karney reported a decision had been reached in the City of Mounds View vs. Greg Johnson, dba Highway 10 Radiator Repair, with the decision being unfavorable to the City. He reported the judge concluded the City must act upon the application for rezoning of the property from R-1 to B-3. He advised they will be appealing the case. He also advised he was served with an order to appear in court on March 12 to explain why the City Report of Director of Community Development/ Public Works Motion Carried Motion Carried Report of Attorney Mounds View City Council Regular Meeting --------------------------------------------------- Council has not acted. Councilmember Hanknex had no report. Councilmember Quick had no report. Mayor Links reported he had ridden with one of the Police officers Saturday night, and had a rather uneventful night. !February 25, 1985 Page Four ------------------------ 11. Reports of Councilmembers Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported that as a result 12. Report of of putting the new squad car into operation last year Clerk/ there is now a surplus vehicle, and Staff has Administrator determined unit 612 is in the worst shape, and recommended it be declared surplus and sold. Motion/Second: Linke/Quick to authorize the Clerk/ n—E stf rator to declare unit #612 as surplus property and sell it for the best price for the City. 3 ayes 0 nays Clerk/Administrator Pauley advised the Council that he had received a notice from the League of Minnesota Cities that the Governor's office will be holding an informational meeting at the Embassy Hotel on Friday, March 8 from 1:30 to 4 PM, regarding the proposed changes in the tax structure. Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported arrangements have been made to have a demo ballot counter on hand for the special election on March 12. He asked that the Council be present to witness how the machine operates. He also asked that they call to order for a special. meeting at 9:30 PM on March 12 to certify the results of the election. Motion Second: Quirk/Hanknex to schedule a special meet ng or arch 12, 1985 at 9:30 PM to certify the results of the special election. 3 ayes 0 nays Clerk/Administrator Pauley asked for Council approval of the recommendation of the Civil Service Commission to appoint Jack Chambers as a police investigator. Motion/Second: Quick/Linke to appoint Jack Chambers as a pol�cestigator, 3 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried i "k IF Motion Carried Motion Carle,,, Mounds View City Council February 25, 1985 Regular Meeting ------- Page -Five-------- -------------------------------- "7- Motion/Second: Quick/Hankner to adjourn the meeting 13, Adjournment aC 8-32 PH. 3 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Respectfully submitted, Donald F. Pauley Clerk/Administrator CONSENT AGENDA MARCH 11, 1985 The Consent Agenda is a technique designed to expedite handling of routine and miscellaneous official business of the City Council. The entire agenda may be adopted by the Council in one motion. The motion for adoption is non -debatable and must receive unanimous approval. By request of any individual Councilmember, an item can be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed upon the Regular Agenda for debate. ITEM A. Approve Purchase Of 1985 Ford Crown Victoria from Minar Ford In the Amount of $11,433.84 Per Staff Memorandum Dated February 28, 1985. ITEM B. Approve Membership In the Suburban Area Chamber r of Commerce At A Cost of $210 Per Year To Be Charged To •Account No. 100-100-4361 ITEM C. Approve Hiring of William Heaton For a Maximum of Sixty -Six (66) Days At $5.50/Hour Commencing Retroactively, February 26, 1985 ITEM D. Set Public Hearing on Proposed Signalization Of Intersection of Highway 10 and Pleasantview Drive For 7:40 P.M. On March 25, 1985 ITEM E. Approve Advertising for a 10:00 A.M. April 12, 1985 Bid Opening For MSA Street Project 1985 ITEM F. Approve Resolution No. 1876 Approving Just And Correct Claims Against City Funds ITEM G. Licenses for Approval Garbage Haulers - Expire 3/31/85 Ace Solid Waste - Renewal Gambling Devices - Expires 3/27/85 Mounds View Lion's Club - New RESOLUTION NO. 1876 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COjNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA APPROVING JUST AND CORRECT CLAIMS AGAINST CITY FUNDS WHEREAS, the City Council of Mounds View, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 412.241) has full authority over the financial affairs of the City and; WHEREAS, The City Council has reviewed the claims numbers: 16557 through 16573 in the amount of $_--147643 15477 through 15544 in the amount of $ 249894.73 through in the amount of $ through in the amount of TOTAL AMOUNT OF CLAIMS PRESENTED $Fn oa and has found said claims to be just and correct; (list of any exception) NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved that the City Council boftMounds View hereby approved the attached lists of claims dated he vote ayes nayes ATTEST.: (SEAL) Mayor lerk-Adm n strator CITY CF MrCNPs VIF4 A C f [ l A Y ! n �. c Ci—I2—F" PA[F I CPFfM N A N C L N T ( L I I P A P' 1 P l o p P c I {4, 016557 SC.CC TIFOTPY FITTMAN SUPPLIFSP VEPICLF --016558 1r415.82 JCVN C JCPNSCN VTHFP FPrFFSSTONAL SrPV ----'t ' 016559 1C.00 MEN LELP PRCGRAM lt'STPUCTPPS a t� 01656C 1p179.3C N W BELL TELEPHONE CC COMMUNICATIC6S-TFLF.PPONE 11--016561 189.4E N V PEEL TEIFPPGNF CO C0MYUNICATTOP 1-TStFPHOFE - -- — � 016562 22,53C.C3 SPrPTP FtLIfTT ANO GTPFP PcCFFSSIPNAL SEPV �u j1 016563 40.0C CITY OF MOUROS VIEW PFFUNOS �)'--016564 148.58 ICFA PFTTPFMFNT CORP PENS TONS --- N 016565 3j9??.50 CPCUP PFALTP PLANT INC CPCUP IRSUPANrE 016566 19456.26 STATE TREASURER PENSICNS : �2'-016567 10.2C MTNNFSOTA MUTUAL LIFE FRCUP INSURANCE -- --1" j 01656E 5C.00 A-1 CUALITY REMCCH.IRC SUPPLIES, PLCCS4CPNOS O;, st. 016569 52.0` NCPTVFRN STATES POWER CO ELECTRICITY c+,, 01657C 195.00 MET CENTFR TICMFTS + REGISTRATIONS 016571 279.?0 CITY OF FRICLFY [OLLECTICNS-04ER AGCYS -- '' 016572 2159499A STATE. TRFAS - P E R A PENSIONS ru' ' 41 . !'�-.016573 37.*531.77 FIRST STATE DANK rF SALAPIESi REGULAR - { AND-SALARIES4TFMP+PAPT TIMF �° a ANC-rVEPTIMEa RFfULAR ;` ff * ° 4 �''• • i 17 71►666.23 NECESSARY EXPENDITURES SINCE LAST COUNCIL MEETING + � ®' 'CITY CF MCUECS VIEW A r C C V t 7 S P A Y A p l r n,?-11-P5 PACE 2 CHECK K A P C. L N 1 C L A T P A N T c L r. p r S F 4 a 015477 17.50 ALPINSCN SUFPLIFS.* Plots+GrNDs ' • �` 015478 7.5C AMFrICAN !THEN cUnD(Y Cr f.LFANTNG-TOYFLS � RAGS :*: _ e�V 015479 535.96 AMFRICAN OFFICE pROr. MIMFC SUFFLTFS ANC-YISC CFFIC.F SUPPLIES ,� eNr'-FOUIPMENT ! -•015480 49C.CC PCCv FUCLUTirt: , INC PPECPAM INSTRUCTORS S : 015461 11.7E PITA OCCKEN KILFACE °i 015482 81G.00 FLECTPIC SERVICE CC REPAIRS.* ECUIPNENT �, s 5 015483 I' 97.31 FECrrS MARKET SUPPl1FS.*CPFRA7TR4 ANC-PTSC OFFICE SUPPLIES a af-035484 85.00 NENN, CTY P.T.A.C. TFAINING �1! 015405 158.56 J C AUTO SUPPLY SUPPLIES.* ECUIPMENT . ---- AND -SUPPLIES.* VF.HTCLF •'. AND-PFPAIRSr VFHICLFS ANF-SUPPLIES.*OPF.RATTN6 I' . 015486 350.GC JIPS BUILDINC PAINT JANITOR SFRVICF y 015487 228.00 LASHINSKI SEPTIC SEP.V. SATELLITFS _-------- _-may ® kl 015488 142.35 LILLIF SU9U'PBAN t+FKS LEGAL NCTICFS ANC-CTPCP. PROFESSIONAL-SEPV -- I 015489 65.80 MPLS STAR + TPIBLNE OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERY ! G1549C 228.00 WALLACE PCRTENSCN PROGRAM INSTRUCTORS 'F--015491 12.93 MCUNDSVIFW OUR CMN pCWF SUPPLIES.* SLDCS+GRNDS ----- 'i '_ 015492 196.15 MOUNDS VIEW PRINTING STATIONERY" d . AND-PRINTINf• 015493 75.10 MPH INCUSTPIES rEPAIRSY ECUIPPENT 015494 842.91 N W BELL TELEPHONE CC COMMUNICATIONS -TELEPHONE �- 15495 59.66 NEW BRTCN7CN NOWE SUPPLTCSr BIOf•S+GRNOS {p ANC -SUPPLIES.* EQUIPMENT he ANO-SUPPIIFS.* VEHICLE " - AND-SUPPLIESrCPEPATTNG - 015496 15C.CG CONALO PAULEY HILEAC•F 015497 f3.90 PFPSI COLA BCTTLINC ff P F F U N D , Y (CITY CF MDUNCS VTF4 A ([ C U N T S P A Y A p t F C3-1?-PF PAGF 3 j CPFCK t A P C 1, N T C L A T M l N T P U P P C S F 01549P cE.00 P CFES,ICNIL PFOCF„S NC OTMFP FR F c S e c � I C FS_ICE'AL EPV •,,� Al a..--01549q Wg5.7C RAMSEY rOUNTY TPFASI'PFR SNCM PICVTNG-SAP9TNG--------- AN,C-TPAFFIC ST(NALS - FLF(T II---015.CC 3q.1C READ PCNNFR OTFFR PRCFFSSICNAL SERV --� 015501 134.0C PAMELA $ pCSE SALAPTES,TEPP#PART TIPE ta! 015502 48.0` ST PAW, FOCWTO TCNCRY MTSC CFFTCE %;PLTFS t----015503 4.413 25 TFXGAS EQUIPMENT I+� a '015504 37.CC MAUREEN THIF.IFN t UPPLIESrCPERATIRG 'rlr-ter L019505 245.00 7P05C(.NT FCCPEPS VIC INSURANCE 4 FCNOS O1:SOE 154.0C ►ASTE Y(RT - BLAINE REFUSE COLLECTION z'7 ' �. 075507 53.75 SANDRA BE.ARDSLEY PRDGRAM INSTRUf,TCRS £� r-- ®}� 015508 25.00 CALF N BICCM PPOGPA►' TNSTPUCTCRS �- u355QS 6C.CC CCUf. BLEEP PROGRAM INSTRUCTORS -01511C 25.0C JUDY DENHAP PPOGRAP INSTRUCTORS i�•1 n,� 015511 394.63 CFBRA DFF EAGF(ORN' PRCGPAM 1NTPL'[iCRS /,I--0b512 371.3C KEN LELM DRGGRAM Ih$TPUCTORS _ a 015513 EG.00 LAURIF. SORENSON PRCGPAM INSTRUCTOR$ 1 � 15 015514 110.00 TIM RCLAN CTHER PROFESSICNAL SERV 0I5515 2.73 RW.F RACE SUPPLIES►OPERATIMG ®r Gi551t 25.0C ANCKA SRS "OFF BEATS" TICKETS 4 REGISTRATIONS 015517 1,295.00 MERMAID SUPPEP CLUP SUPPLIES,CPFQATTNG --A1551E 3s424.C( BARTCN-ASChMAN ASSOC. CTHER PROFESSIONAL SERV - ,y, ® ;,i 07551q 15.OG MPS. JACCBS R F F U N 0 `< <'• 016.5?C 11.00 JIM FATTCN P F F U N C -015521 4.25 JGSHUA FRANKF - FYLAND P E F U N D --- �,fl .011522 2q.00 HFLEN MCNTATK R E F U N D 025522 11.5C JCHNANDFUSKC P F F 11 N (i WICITY Or MCUNOS VIEW 1. C r ( L 1 5 P t Y t P I F 1-1 7-F-5 WE 4 MCK L I I F A a I P u p c 5 015524 11.5C ERMA FMINS F F F L! P t 015525 1105C JbSnN PLIPCUTST F F F U N P !I 015!2t 1184c Cfc'FV fUHUCLF P F r U N r 015527 22*CC LAUR6 t MIKE GAAF0 p F F L. N P. 01352e 1145C MATT JANNUSCF c F F U k P 025525 listo KFVIS' YLCSTPEICH P E F U y 015!3C 1100 JIM KQfNFN p E F Ll N r J iff Ti sal015531 11 5 c. SIEVE LM, E F UN P 019532 1145C ArAP PAYWFLL p F F u N c 015533 R E F U N 0 11050 DAPRIF POSPAN 511, 0 5534 1105C CMAC Pl-TEL P F F U N P 0:55,35 11450 MaY PATEL p E F u v r 01953t 11850 JASON PATTCN R F F u F c iE . . I 15337 1 it 50- JASON MEJA p F F U N D 015538 19536 1105C JCFN UNPERFILL R E F U h P 015531 25.CC RAMSEY CLINIC ASSOC* CTPEP PREFESSICNAL SEPV --0,"54c 40400 RICFAP0 OFFARAIS REFUNDS 015541 40.CC APCHIF SWSUN REFUNDS 025542 3elc0 GFORCE SFOCVTCK M. p F F U N 0 —015543 4rqo5t AMY ZEBRC RFPAIRSP FCVIPVFNT 015544 11.5G SCOTT OARWICK p F p 11 N 0 68 2409403 CHECKS kRTTTFN —TOTAL OF 85 CHECKS T07AL Qff 'itrfq6 TO: Mayor, City Council and Clerk -Administrator FROM: Police Department DATE: March 19 1985 RE: COMMUNITY SERVICE OFFICER POSITION During the middle of February 19851 we advertised for applicants for the position of Community Service Officer. We recieved 21 applications and interviewed all of the prospective candidates. On March 1, 1985, Mary Kay Thoreson was selected for the position. She has lived in the City for five years at 7801 Woodlawn Drive. aHer nd husbandor for the Citdistrict.oMary Minneapolis has previously worked for Ramsey County Human Services and enjoys public relations. She is currently involved in volunteer work for Ramsey County Human Services. r 1 RECOMMENDATION: 1 ' City Council authorize the hiring of Mary Kay Thoreson for the Position of Community Service Officer to begin on/or about March 18, 1985. RESOLUTION NO.1875 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION REQUESTING PROHIBITION OF SEMI TRAILER TRUCK TRAFFIC ON 85th AVENUE/COUNTY ROAD J WHEREAS, the City of Mounds View has taken an active role in encouraging the construction of Highway 610; and WHEREAS, the City feels that either the partial (as designed for Phase I) or total construction of Highway 610 is needed in order to reduce the volume of traffic and alleviate congested conditions on Trunk Highway 10; and WHEREAS, it is also the desire of the City to reduce traffic volumes and eliminate semi trailer and large truck traffic on 85th Avenue/County Road J; and WHEREAS, it is the responsibility of Anoka and Ramsey Counties to regulate traffic on 85th Avenue/County Road J. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mounds View request that, upon completion of either Phase I or the total construction of Highway 610, Anoka and Ramsey Counties cooperatively regulate traffic on 85th Avenue/County Road J from the junction of County Road J extension at Interstate 35W to Highway 65 in such a manner as to prohibit the use of this road by semi trailer and large trucks. ATTEST: (SEAL) Adopted this day of March, 1985. Mayor Clerk -Administrator ORDINANCE NO. 386 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE. NUMBER 319 GRANTING A FRANCHISE TO GROUP W CABLE OF THE NORTH SUBURBS, INC., A MINNESOTA CORPORATION, TO OPERATE. AND MAINTAIN A CABLE COMMUNICATION SYSTEM IN THE CITY The Council of the City of Mounds View does hereby ordain: Article III. DESIGN OF SYSTEM Section 1. CHANNEL CAPACITY - SUBSCRIBER NETW ORK Article III, Section 1, Paragraphs A and B are amended to require a System capable of providing upon activation at least 59 downstream channels to be constructed pursuant to the conditions of the proposal of Group W . The system will be constructed as a dual cab Is system capable of providing 108 downstream channels but with electronic components allowing the activation of 59 channels. Section 3. TWO-WAY CAPACITY Article III, Section 3 is amended to require Group W to initially activate a two-way capable System on one instead of both cables. Section 4. FACILITIES Article III, Section 4 is amended to require Group W to construct its facilities as set forth in its proposal to the City. Section 5. SPECIAL CHANNEL AND ACCESS REQUIRE- MENTS_ Article III, Section 5 is amended to require the Systera to carry broadcast stations, an emergency override channel, an audio/video emergency override system, and 13 access channels including public (2), educa- tional, government, leased (1), regional, religious, senior citizens, library, higher education, private school access, and public school access (2). The franchise details specific access rules which must be developed by Group W. ORDINANCE NO. 386 PAGE TWO Article V. CONSTRUCTION, INITIAL SERVICE AREA, LINE EXTENSION AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS Section 3. CONSTRUCTION TIMETABLE Article V, Section 3, Paragraph B is amended to require Group W to construct all areas of the City which contain dwelling units on or before November 12, 1984. Article VI. SYSTEM OPERATIONS Section 4. FRANCHISE FEES, RATES, CHARGES, CHANGES IN FEES AND PROCEDURES Article VI, Section 4, Paragraphs A, B, C, and D are amended to require that throughout the term of the franchise, Group W shall pay to City an annual fee of 58 of all gross revenues. The rates provided in ythe ear shall be guaranteed for one (1) fran completion of construction of 541 miles of cable plant in the ten -city North Suburban initial service area. Basic rates shall be regulated pursuant to the terms and conditions of the franchise allowing changes in rates unless the City specifically disapproves such changes. Rates for other than basic service shall be regulated purusant to the terms and conditions of the franchise. This section further details the procedures for the regulation of other than basic service rates in the event the law should provide for their regulation. Article XIV. JOINT SYSTEM, ACCEPTANCE, INCORPORATION OP OFFERING, EXHIBITS, PUBLICATION Section 2 TIME OF ACCEPTANCE, GUARANTEES INCORPORATION OF OFFERING! EXHIBITS Article XIV, Section 2, Paragraph H is amended by deleting "Exhibit A - Grantee schedules of rates" and substituting "Exhibit A - 1 - Grantee schedule of rates." ORDINANCE NO. 386 PAGE THREE This ordinance shall take effect thirty days after the date of its publication. Read by the Council of the City of Mounds View on this day of 1985. Read and passed by the Council of the City of Mounds View this day of 1985. ATTEST: Mayor (SEAL) Clerk -Administrator ' PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA Regular Meeting February 11, 1985 Mounds View City Hall 2401 Hwy. 10, Mounds View, MN 55112 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- The Mounds View City Council was called to order at 7:30 PM on February 11, 1985 by Mayor Linke. The Pledge of Allegiance was said. MEMBERS PRESENT: Councilmembers Blanchard and Quick and Mayor Links. It was noted that Councilmember Hankner was absent at a meeting. ALSO PRESENT: Attorney Karney, Clerk/Administrator au ey an Public Works/Community Development Director Thatcher. 1. Call to Order 2. Pledge of Alleg. 3. Roll Call ' Motion/Second: Blanchard/Quick to approve the minutes 4. o t e anuary 21, 1985 Human Rights Conmission meeting as presented. 3 ayes 0 nays Motion/Second: Quick/Blanchard to approve the minutes o t e January 28, 1985 City Council meeting as presented. 3 ayes 0 nays There were no residents requests or comments from the floor, Motion Second: Quick/Blanchard to approve the consent agen a as amended, changing the date of Item D to February 19, 1985, and waive the reading of the resolutions, Approval of '!inutes : I`uman Rights 1/21./85 and City Council 1/28/85 :lotion Carried Motion Carried 5, Residents Requests and Comments from the Floor 6. Approval of Consent Agenda 3 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Mounds View City Council Regular Meeting February 11, 1985 Page Two ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Clerk/Administrator Pauley reviewed the proposed 7. Considerat:f amendments to Resolution No. 1160, Resolution .. 1868 Motion Second: Quick/Blanchard to approve Reso utlon No. 1868, amending Resolution No. 1160 outlining the policy for useage of the City Hall Community Room, and waive the reading of the resolution. 3 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Moticn Second: Blanchard/Quick to approve Resolution 8. Consideration of No. 1869, approving the labor agreement between the Resolution No. Metropolitan Area Management Association and I.U.O.E. 1869 Local No. 49, AFL-CIO for calendar years 1985-1986, and waive the readincy of the resolution. 3 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Director Thatcher reported the Planning Commission 9. Report of would like to hire David Licht and Associates Director of formally known as Midwest Planners, to review the Public Works/ comprehensive plan, at a cost not to exceed Community $3,000.00. He advised he will be negotiating with Developmen, Mr. Licht and will keep the Council advised. Director Thatcher reported that Mr. Clyde Merilatt had approached Staff and asked if he could sell a piece of property that is wetlands zoned to someone who would like to build on it. Director Thatcher indicated to Mr. Merilatt that Staff could not give approval, and he would have to follow the proper channels, and studies would have to be conducted to see if it was feasible to build on that property. Director Thatcher presented an overhead of the property. He stated it is Staff's opinion that the property io a wetland end he would not recommend approval of building on the property. Clerk/Administrator Pauley stated Mr. Merilatt would like the Council to agree to let him proceed without a conditional use permit or appropriate engineering studies. He reviewed the history of the wetlands ordinance with Mr. Merilatt and advised him of the proper procedure to follow. Councilmember Blanchard stated she recalled soil borings vv-ore done on that property at one time and 1 several problems were found. Mounds View City Council February 11, 1985 Regular Meeting Page Three --------------- ------------ ---------------- ---, It was the concensus of the Council that they would not bypass the proper procedures. Mayor Links opened the informational meeting at 7:46 PM. Scott Michael Pierson, 2275 Groberg, stated a petition had been presented at the last Council meeting requesting parking be allowed from midnight to 6 AM and asked the status of the situation. Mayor Linke replied the City is sympathetic to the parking problems the apartment residents are having. He explained that three }rears ago the City agreed to do a similar type of parking arrangement as had been proposed by the apartment residents, to move a fence back and allow parking on the property, but when- it got down to the cost, the apartment owner backed out, He explained the City will be checking into this location and doing planning on the possible options, but they must wait until spring when the snow is gone, Director Thatcher stated Groberg is one of the few streets in the City that has no parking signs on both sides of the street, as the street is very narrow, and if parking were allowed along one side, the remaining road would be too narrow for two vehicles to pass each other, Mr. Pierson asked if parking would be allowed along the ditch, Clerk/Administrator Pauley replied that it would not be, as that is City property, Director Thatcher reported Staff had conducted a study of the City to find out where people were parking at night on the street, and he presented overheads, showing the areas and rev4ewed the findings. Mr. Pierson asked why parking is not allowed from midnight to 6 AM when it is allowed during the day, Police Chief Ramacher explained when there were no restrictions, people were parking on both sides of the street and they were leaving cars narked indefinitely, which is why the restrictions were put into place, to make sure the vehicles are moved daily. He added they are trying to improve the signage in the City, 10, lt*rmationAl Meeting � On Street Parking Mounds View City Council February 11, 1985page Four Regular Meeting -- Page - ------------ ----------------------------------------gaga-- Clerk/Administrator Pauley explained Staff has spent approximately two months evaluating the signs in the City and doing traffic counts. He also reviewed Staff s recommendation to the City Council. Alice Fritz, 8072 Long Lake Road, asked if the cars in violation were ticketed. Chief Ramacher stated that if they were parked in a no -parking zone, he believed they would have been tagged. Mr. Fritz asked if the residents were allowed to park along the road easement on Long Lake Road, off the pavement. Chief Ramacher replied that according to the ordinance, they cannot park on the boulevard. However, if someone is expecting a large group Of request ale n exceptioan n betthe made forlthe occasion.artment and Barb Haake, 3024 County Road I, stated she had contacted the Police before for just such a situation and found them to be very cooperative. Mayor Linke closed the informational meeting at 8:11 PM. Motion/Second: Blanchard/Quick to adopt the recommen- at ons rom Staff dated February 1, 1985 and have them implemented by June 1, 1985. 3 ayes 0 nays Councilmember Blanchard asked if the Police could also check Pauleytrepliedhe sthey on cwill ycontact theecounty andt task r them to do it. Attorney Kerney reported there had been no decision reached yet in the Highway 10 Radiator case. Councilmember Blanchard reported she had attended an energy workshop on February 9, and found it very informative.' Councilmember Quick reported he had attended the conference for newly elected officials on February 9 and found it very informative. Mayor Links reported the City had received notice from the National Arbour Day Foundation that Mounds View has been named Tree City USA, for the third year running. The award will be presented on Arbour Day, Mayor Links expressed appreciation for the great job done by the forester. 1 0 Motion Carried 11, Report of Attorney 12. Reports of Councilmembers 0 Mounds View City Council February 11, 1985 Page Five Regular Meeting ---------- --------------------- ------------------------------------------ ' Mayor Linke apologized for overlooking the reappointment of Jean Miller to the Planning Commission. Motion/Second: Quick/Blanchard to reappoint Jean Miller to the Planning Commission. Motion Carried 3 ayes 0 nays Mayor Links reported the Appreciation Dinner would Rae allroom, tickets be willnbearch 29, availabletthe from the Councilmembers.el Clerk/Administrator Pauley reviewed proposed for the 13. Report of Clerk/Administ- Resolution No. 1871 and the arrangements rator special election on March 12. Motion/Second: Linke/Blanchard to approve Resolution of and qo, , ratifying the appointment precinct judges for the special counting center election election, and waive the reading of the resolution. Motion Carried 3 ayes 0 nays Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported a report had been issues regarding the received on the environmental expansion. He reported Blaine will proposed airport be holding a public hearing at the Blaine Senior High School on March 6 at 7 PM. He reported he will be the Council at their next reviewing the report with meeting. Motion/Second: Blanchard/Quick to adjourn the meeting 14. Adjournment Motion Carried 3 ayes 0 nays CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW CITY COUNCIL AGENDA SESSION March 18, 1985 7:00 p.m. 1. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding 1985 Clean - Up Day 2. Consideration of Staff Memorandum.Regarding Proposed Federal Budget Cuts 3. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding 1985 Goal Setting 4. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding Metropolitan Airports Commission 1985 - 1986 Capital Improvements Program 5. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding Review of Municipal Code Chapters 48, 49 and 49A 6. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding Storm Water Management Costs 7. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding North Suburban Cable Commission Request for 1985 Budget Contributions 8. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding Highway 10 Radiator Rezoning and Conditional Use Permit PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA Canvassing Board Meeting March 12, 1985 Mounds View City Hall 2401 Hwy. 10, Mounds View City Hall ----------------------------------- Mayor Jerry Linke called the meeting 1. CALL TO ORDER to order at 9:30 p.m. on March 12, 1985. Members Present: Mayor Linke, Council - members Hankner, Blanchard, Quick. Others Present: Clerk -Administrator Pauley Motion/Second: Hankner and Blanchard moved to adopt Resolution No. 1874 Canvassing Election Results of March 12, 1985 Special Municipal Election and Waive Reading of the Same. 4 ayes 0 nays Motion/Second: quick and Hankner to adjourn at 9:32 p.m. 4 ayes 0 nays DFP/mjs 2. ROLL CALL 3. MOTION CARRIED 4. MOTION CARRIED - ADJOURNMENT Respectfully submitted, Donald F. Pauley Clerk -Administrator MEMO TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: CLERK -ADMINISTRATOR DATE: MARCH 11, 1985 SUBJECT: 1985 CLEAN UP DAY As you know, each year the City schedules a Saturday where the City makes available to the residents of Mounds View, for a minimal charge, facilities where they may dispose of surplus items in their homes and on their property. As I recently indicated to you the 1984 Clean -Up Day could be considered the most successful the City has yet to hold in that more material was removed than ever before at a net loss to the City of $90.51 which is significantly less than has ever been experienced by the City in the past. Normally, Clean -Up Day is scheduled for a Saturday in May, other than fishing opener weekend, which is the weekend of May 18th. Staff would recommend Council consider scheduling Clean -Up Day either for Saturday, May llth or 25th. Also, attached to this memorandum for your information is a letter and proclamation from Governor Rudy Perpich proclaiming May 1985 as Minnesota Beautiful Month. It would strike Staff that our scheduling of Clean-UD Day during the month of May would be consistent with the efforts of the Governor to have clean-up, recycling and beautification programs throughout the state during that month. RECOMMENDATION: Staff would recommend scheduling of Clean -Up Day for Saturday, May llth or 25th, 1985. R1114 1'PRPICII Idl\I RWH February 28, 1985 Dear Mayor: STATE OF MINNESOTA OFFRI OF 11w GtNEI 11 ST. PAUL 55155 In keeping with Minnesota's reputation as the state with the good life, I have proclaimed May 1985 to be Minnesota Beautiful Month. During the month of May, the Minnesota Beautiful Program will organize Minnesotans in a statewide effort to improve their communities. I am hoping that every community throughout the state will participate with their own cleanup, recycling and beautification programs. One of the most important things we can do to facilitate a healthy economy is to make Minnesota a more attractive and pleasing place to live, work and do business. We cannot have a sound economy without a sound environment. I feel that you, as a leader in your community, can be instrumental in encouraging citizens to undertake environmental cleanup projects. All of us have a stake in preserving the natural beauty of our state, and I know that Minnesota works best when it harnesses the talents and energies of its people. I have asked Frank Ongaro (297-3190) and Nick Riley (297-4736) of the Environmental Resources Development office to be available for any questions you may have about participation in Minnesota Beautiful Month, and I encourage you to contact them before initiating cleanup projects within your community. ,Sincerely, G PERPI , Governor AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER 1 ,.w. Proclamation 144EREAS: She Stale of Minnesota is rich In natural resources and beauty: and WHEREAS: Every citizen shwd make a diligent effort to keeo our enwronment clean and healthful by wrklna logelner to deserve clean air, fresh win and the natural beauty of our ,lot.: am WHEREAS: Vumesota Beautiful Vnntb Is organizing Minnesotans In a statewide effort to Improve the mamuwty 014 onnmt by esmbusRbq recycling programs, clean up #fro . IanH.reping, beautlflcallm and fret Planting; and WHEREAS: Vu esita Beautiful roatlittee. a group of IVDIIc and petiole volunteers. originated Yuneota Beautiful Month to toms attentlm an the efforts of concenned Vimesotana; HOW. THEREFORE, I, Rudv Perwch, Governor of the Stale of Minnesota, do hereby doclalm the month of .Vay E➢BS. to be - Mi-area a ,'Natautifal Month in Minnesota, and ask all citizens from budnesrn, civic groups, government agenclo add other organizations to Wm together to preserve the Colonel beauty of our $tale hot only d ting Mlnnrsoto Beautiful Month, but throughout the year. IV WITVESS WHENU)t, I have heMudo set my hand and towed the Great Seat of the Stott of Mmseald 10 be affixed at the Stale Capllal this Iwenityleventh day of ROWaber In Pie year of our Land ant thou$om: nine hundred and elghtyfaur, and of the Slate the me hundred "fitly-sevedln. G yERNO 61 SECRETARY OF STATE . ► ��`C C� MEMO TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL FROM: CLERK-ADMI DATE: MARCH 5, 1985 SUBJECT: PROPOSED FEDERAL BUDGET Attached to this memorandum please find a letter that I received from Mr. James Bellus, Director of the City of St. Paul's Department of Planning and Economic Development along with attachments from the United States Conference of Mayors regarding the Reagan Administration's Proposed Cuts In Federal Aid To Cities. Mr. Bellus' letter and accompanying documents are most pursuasive as to the significance that President Reagan's proposed budgetary cuts would have on cities. Unfortunate- ly, as of yet the public hue and cry about these cuts has been limited to its impacts on State government and the farmers of our country. It is my thought that the time has come for the cities to also voice, in no uncertain terms, their objections to the Federal budget proposals due to their impact not only on farmers but also on the elderly, the poor, small businesses and the general tax paying public as a whole. President Reagan is saying that he will not raise the Federal Taxes, however, he has neglected to point out to the general public that his budget balancing act will more than .likely result in increased taxes on either the State or Local level and somewhere along the line this message needs to be communicated to the public so they can begin to realize that the Federal budget deficit is being balanced on the backs of the people of this nation to their detrement. My thoughts on this issue are, should the Council approve of my proposal, would be that Mayor Linke and I would undertake efforts through the Mayor's Association and League of Minnesota Cities to encourage the organization and scheduling of a rally to which our Congressmen, Senators, and Representatives of the Reagan Administration be invited to hear from us our concerns regarding the Reagan Administration budget proposals. Also, as I would visualize this as being a media event, I would anticipate that major press coverage of this rally would occur. I am proposing this rally and the efforts of Mayor Links and myself as a result of my frustration with the lack of efforts on the part of the League of Cities or any other state-wide organization to communicate to the public what the impacts of the Reagan budget would be on themselves and the cities in which they live and encourage them to communicate their concerns to the Administration. I will MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MARCH 7,1985 PAGE TWO only undertake efforts on this proposal should you agree with it and authorize me to do so. DFP/mjs Attachment: r_, c oil F� 1111' 111111 1.64 GEORGE LATIMER MAYOR February 26,1985 Donald F. Pauley Clerk Administrator 2401 Highway No. 10 Mounds View, MN 55112 Dear Mr. Pauley; CITY OF SAINT PAUL DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT JAMES J. BELLUS, DIRECTOR 25 West Fourth Street, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55102 612-292.1577 As you are undoubtedly aware, the Reagan Administration has proposed a series of budget cuts that would all but eliminate federal aid to cities for housing and community development activities. Their plan calls for eventual elimination of general revenue sharing, urban development action, grants (UDAG), small business administration (SBA) loans and grants, all subsidized housing programs, economic development administration (EDA) programs, all new sewer grants and severely limits federal funds for transportation projects and the Community Development Block Grant Program. We have all gotten used to repeated attempts over the past several years to reduce federal aid to our cities. If anything, we have become a little complacent in our willingness to continue to accept "minor" cuts in our program as a way of life. My reading of the present situation, however, is that the Reagan budget proposals of this year are not ploys aimed at simply trying to get minor reductions in city programs but that they are very directed attempts to totally eliminate federal aid to cities. The threat is real and one which we cannot afford to ignore. The purpose of my letter today is to urge you to take a very active role in ensuring that our feelings are made known to our Congressional delegation about the value of such programs in our communities. There is a great story to be told in each community about the positive impacts of the programs we administer. Unless the story is told strongly and convincingly to our Congressional delegation in the immediate future, we may find that cities no longer have any community/economic development programs available to assist our business people and residents. 1 would suggest that you communicate formally, in writing, and informally, if you happen to have personal contact with someone in a Congressional office. Give them a list of specific projects that would not have happened in your community without the programs mentioned above. There is a fantastic story to be told of small businesses that would not exist, of public facilities that would not have been built, and of people who would not be housed, if it were not for federally assisted programs. 1 am convinced that if the people in Congress can see the concrete and tangible results of these programs, if they can see the facts of the number of jobs created, number of housing units built and the amount the tax base has been increased and if they can be made aware that all of these programs have directly affected their constituents, then they will overwhelmingly reject the Reagan plan. The President talks about taking his defense budget proposal to the citizens of this Country in an attempt to generate broad based public support. I would suggest to you that we must do the same if we are going to continue to receive the federal assistance that we so desperately need. Therefore; in addition to your personal efforts at communicating with the Congressional representatives and the State Legislature, you should also ensure that those citizens in your community who have been benefitted by these federal programs also write to make their views known. The National Community Development Agency is one of the national groups spearheading this lobbying and information sharing effort. For more information on the status of national legislation you may want to call Luther Roberts at 202-293-7587. Remember, the threat to all of us and our cities is real. two weapons we have to counteract the Reaean Admini� Sincerely, J mes I Be lus D rector JJB/Ile attachments TO: Mayors Attending the Mid -Winter Meeting FROM: John J. Gunther DATE: January 18, 1985 RE: UPDATE ON THE FY86 BUDGET The Administration's FY86 budget is expected to recommend that many different urban programs be terminated or cut substantially. Programs slated to be completely eliminated -- some in FY86 and others over a two or three-year time span -- are: GENERAL REVENUE SHARING; EDA PROGRAMS; URBAN DEVELOPMENT ACTION GRANTS (UDAG); ALL NEW SEWER GRANTS; ALL SUBSIDIZED HOUSING PROGRAMS, INCLUDING HOUSING VOUCHERS; SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION LOANS AND GRANTS; LEGAL SERVICES; COMMUNITY SERVICES; THE JOB CORPS. On December 14, Mayor Hernar, Padilla and Mayor George Voinovich, presidents of the Conference of Mayors and the National League of Cities, respectively, met with President Reagan and Vice President Bush to discuss the FY86 budget. They were given the budget table attached to this memorandum, describing in detail the three year -plan for terminating and reducing urban and low income programs. This is the only actual document given to the mayors by the White House or OMB so far. Since the date of the memo, a few changes and additional details have come to our attention. UNITED STATES CONFERENCE OF MAYORS a 1620 EYE STREET, N.W. • WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006 •TELEPHONE: (202)293.7330 2 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT /I Community Development Block Grant funds to entitlement cities (those over 50,000 in population) may be cut by nearly one-fourth under the Administration's proposed budget plan for FY86. When OMB passed back the FY86 budget plan to HUD it recommended that in addition to the 10 percent cut already proposed for CDBG, the Farmers Home Public Facility Program should be transferred from Agriculture to HUD, with no funding, and combined with the state - administered small cities CDBG program. The current 70 percent - 30 percent split for entitlement and non -entitlement jurisdictions in the CDBG program would be changed to 60 percent - 40 percent. This increases the cut for entitlement cities by 14.3 percent. Cities funded through the small cities program would feel the impact of this proposed shift as well, since they would be competing with rural jurisdictions for funding. PUBLIC TRANSIT Based on materials obtained from the Office of Management and Budget, it appears that the Administration is planning to propose in February elimination, starting in FY86, of all public transportation assistance, except for the $1.1 billion generated annually by the one -cent gasoline tax set -aside. Under the OMB scenario, the $1.1 ' billion, currently a discretionary program, would replace the $2.7 / billion formula program. No operating assistance or new rail starts would be permitted. The cut, if proposed, would represent a 71 per cent reduction in federal transit assistance to cities. HEALTH A cut of almost eight percent below current services levels is expected for the Public Health Service, a reduction of $386 million from the FY85 level and $724 million less than the agency would spend to keep programs operating at current levels. The cuts, which extend across the Public Health Service, affect programs in the Health Resources and Services Administration, the Alcohol, Drug Abuse and Mental Health Administration, the Centers for Disease Control, the Food and Drug Administration, and the National Institutes of Health, formerly considered untouchable. Entitlement programs will be cut in the FY86 budget as well. The biggest cuts are expected in Medicare, scheduled to be reduced by $4.9 billion in FY86 and $21.6 billion by FY88. The bulk of savings will come from a one year freeze in hospital payments and extension of the freeze on physician fees. 3 Smaller savings are to come from increases in the premiums paid by Medicare beneficiaries and a delay in the initial eligibility to the first day of the month following a beneficiary's 65th birthday. Medicaid cuts are to amount to $1 billion in FY86 and will rise to $5.7 billion by FYSS as a result of a planned federal cap on payments to states. Congress last year refused to continue an earlier three year cap on the program despite an Administration request that the cap be extended. The overall impact of cuts in the Medicare and Medicaid programs is a shifting of costs to beneficiaries, providers and local and state governments. ALTERNATIVE BUDGETS FROM CONGRESS Many senior Senators and Members of Congress have already rejected the Administration budget and have pledged to draft their own alternatives. Majority Leader Dole is leading an effort in the Senate to draft a budget plan and release it prior to the Administration's budget submission date of February 4. In addition, many Members of Congress are promoting the concept of a temporary one-year budget freeze which would reduce the deficit by significantly more than the Administration's budget. Their plan is to use the one year period to devise a more permanent alternative method of reducing the federal deficit. SUMMARY OF TENTATIVE •FREEZE PLUS•. SPENDING REDUCTION PLAN (SEE NOTE BELOW) Proposal 1986 1987 1988 Budget Plan Targets_ 1) Deficit Share of GNP ............so........... 4.0% 3.0% 2.0E 2) Deficit Target Ceiling ...................... $170' $138• $99• 3) Spending Cut Needed to Hit Deficit Targets,... -42 -85 -110 Summary of Savings Proposals Direct Freezes or Freeze Equivalents 1) Cast -of -Living Adjustment Except Social Security -2.6 •4.6 -6.0 2) Discretionary Programs: Budget Authority Freezes -3.0 •3.9 -4.6 3) Medicare/Medicaid Mostly Provider Freezes .... -3.8 -8.3 -14.2 4) Subtotal, Freezes.............. .s.......... . -9.4 -16.8 •24. Major Program Reforms 5) 5% Civilian Pay Cut ......................... -2.6 •3.0 •0.7 .3.2 •0.8 6) Child Nutrition: Upper Income Subsidy sees... -0.7 •00 •0.8 7) Civil Service Retirement ..................... -0.3 -0.3 •1.1 -1.2 8) Student Aid Reform ....................:.sees •0s3 •0:7 •+.'0 9) Navigation User Fees .......................: ••• •0.4 10) VA Medical Care System .....sees, s000ss -•• A.2 •0s5 -0.5 11) REA Subsidized Loans ....... I .... I ... ......... 12) Power Marketing Administrations: Debt Repay- ment Reform (Grace Commission) .........s..e.s -0.5 •0.5 •0.5 •6.7 13) Farm Price Support Reform ........ $.....$..e.4 •1.2 •5.9 14) Mineral Receipt Share with States: Net Profit 15) Sharing......................... e.......s... SubsigizedFarmCredit Reform ................ •0.4 -2.5 •0.4 -2.9 .A 4 16) Mousing Guarantee Origination Fees ........... -1.0 •1.0 •3.1 17) Grace Commission User Fees ..............sse.. -1s0 •1 S s 18) Subtotal, Major Reforms ...........see..e. •11.0 -18.6 •21. Program Terminations 19) Impact Aid Part B .1................e......... •0.1 •0.1 .0.1 .0.6 -0e1 -0.7 20) Job Corps..........................e...s..... •0.2 -0.3 •0e3 21) 22) WIN.......................................s.s Legal and Community Services ............sees. •0.5 •0.7 -0.7 23) Civilian Aeronautical R&D ........s.....s..s.s •0.3 •0.3 -0. + Note: All dollar figures are in billions. The deficit target ceiling is the Administration's goal -- the deficit figure they would like to achieve. Program reforms are reductions which would require authorizing legislation by the Congress. Program termination are complete eliminations of programs, some over one year, others over a two or three year time span. Proposal 1986 1987 1988 24) EDA and Appalachia ............................ -0.1 -0.5 -0.2 -0.2 -0.3 -0.8 25) AMTRAK and Other Rail Subsidies ............. -0.6 •0.2 26) Health Professions Training :...:......:.:. •�� .0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 27) Soil and Water Conservation Programs .......•• .0.8 -1.6 -2.7 28) Urban Mass Transit .........................• __- -0.1 -0.3 29) UDAG......................................... -4.6 -4.6 30) General Revenue Sharing ...................... --- -0.1 -0.2 31) New Sewer Project Grants ..................... -0.8 -0.8 -0.8 32) Postal Subsidy .............................. -2.2 -3.1 -3.7 ?a) Subisidized Rural Housing ...............•••••• .0.1 -0.3 -0.5 34) HUD Housing Moratorium ....................... -0.1 35) Rural Water and Sewer -0.4 .1.4 2.0 36) Export -Import Bank Direct Loans .............. -2.2 -1.9 -1.8i 37) Small. Business Administration ............... -2.2 -2.2 -2.2 38) Strategic Petroleum Reserve (Moratorium) ..... -0.1 -0. -0. 39•) Air Carrier Subsidies ........................ -0.22 -0.4 40) Crop Insurance Subsidy (Phase -out) ........... -0.1 41) Subtotal, Major Terminations ............ -10.9 -20.4 -23. All Other Cuts 42) Io% 1986 BA Cut in Nuclear Fission b Fusion .. :.2 -.2 :•2 '43) 10% 1986 BA Cut in Non -Nuclear Energy ........ '•1 -.1 44) 10% 1986 BA Cut in Agricultural Research ..... -•1 45) Stop Public Lands and Park Acquisitions; -•2 3 _' _ 4 Consolidate offices .......................... -.1 -.1 -.2 46) lOS 1986 BA Cut in NOAA ...................:. -•1 _�2 •,.3 47) SSA/SSI Administrative Reductions ............ -.3 -.5 48) 10% Cut in Other Federal Administrative Accounts -.3 49) 10% Cut in CDBG ............................. -.2 -.1 -.1 -.2 50) Highway Obligations Freeze ................... -.1 -.5 51) Space Program Stretchout .................0... - 9 .1.7 -2.3 52) All Other .................................... - r 53) Subtotal, All Other Cuts- ..........••••• L2.3 -4.3 -5.2 -33.6 -60.0 - 44.7 54) Grand Totals ................................. MEMO TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL FROM: CLERK-ADMINISTRATO DATE: MARCH 5, 1985 SUBJECT: 1985 GOAL SETTING I have been approached by members of the City Council regarding the scheduling of a goal setting session for 1985 soon after the election of the new city councilmember. In discussing my thoughts regarding a goal setting session with Mayor Linke it became obvious that my thoughts regarding this issue should be conveyed to the entire City Council for your consideration. My proposal for setting goals in 1985 is as follows: 1. As soon as possible after the new councilmember is sworn into office it would be my suggestion that the entire City Council meet with Department Heads on two to three consecutive Saturdays in April to review with each of the Department Heads the current status of departmental opera- tions, the current condition of their equipment and facilities including site visits where appropriate, a general discussion of the Depart- ment Head's views of the effectiveness of his department in providing the services expected of that department, and finally the Department Head's thoughts as to what he feels should be the goals for his department over the next two year period. Should the Council agree to this it is my thought that this would bring all of you to an equal level of understanding as to exactly what the City Staff is doing and what the current conditions of our operations and facilities are. This should allow you to enter into a goal setting session all having relatively similar levels of understanding in this area. 2. Immediately upon completing presentations by the four Department Heads regarding the departmental operations of the City, I would take the opportunity to review those operations directly under my control and to discuss with you what I feel are going to be the challenges faced by the City of Mounds View over the next two year period, both in the way of service levels, revenues and development issues. MAYOR AND COUNCIL MARCH 5, 1985 PAGE TWO 3. Once these sessions have been conducted and hopefully attended by all members of the City Council, a goal setting session would be scheduled where the City Council would undertake a program similar to that which we did in 1984 to set two year goals for the City. I am suggesting a two year period for goal setting due to the fact that after the election of the new City Councilmember only nine months will be left in 1985 and we will soon be into the budget and construction seasons allowing a minimal amount of time to address any of these goals. Also, due to the lack of success in our actually addressing the goals set in 1984, it is my hope that a two year program would provide us with greater time and opportunity to undertake the goals determined by the City Council. I would like to take the opportunity to discuss this proposal with you and should you agree to it, begin the process of scheduling these work sessions and having Department Heads prepare themselves for their formal presentations. Should it be your desire to undertake the goal setting effort in a different manner, preparation for doing so will still be necessary. DFP/mjs 0 MEMO TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: CLERK-ADMINISTRATO DATE: MARCH 11, 1985 SUBJECT: METROPOLITAN AIRPORTS COMMISSION 1985-1986 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAMS Attached for your information is a copy of the Metropolitan Airports Commission 1985-1986 Capital Improvement Programs which were submitted to the Metropolitan Council for their review and comment. Staff's only comment with respect to these documents is that the Council may wish to reiterate those statements made at the recent public hearing with respect to the implementation of their Master Plan Program as the Commission's 1986 projects will implement the first phases of that program. Your direction in this matter will be appreciated. DFP/mjs Attachment: Metropolitan Council 300 Metro Square Building Seventh and Robert StrIA St. Paul, Minnesota.bt Telephone (612)291.6359 March 5, 1985 To Whom It May Concern: RE: Metropolitan Airports Commission 1985-1986 Capital Improvement Programs Received 02/15/85 Metropolitan Council Referral File No. 12675-1 The Metropolitan Council has received the Metropolitan Airports �1 Commission 1985-1986 Capital Improvement Programs for review and comment. The Council will be reviewing this in the next few weeks and would welcome any comments you may wish to make. Any comments should be sent within one week. Thank you. MAA:ch Sincerely, METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Martha A� Allen Assistant Referral Coordinator L.:J An Equal opportunity Employer T February 11, 1985 A"ohs • Sautt Pal METROPOLITAN AIRPORTS COMMISSION P. 0. BOX I= TWIN CITY AIRPORT 0 MINNESOTA $5111 OFFICE OF EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR 0 /MONK (112) 726-1112 Sandra S. Gerdebringo Chair Metropolitan Council 300 Metro Square Building St. Paulo MN 55101 RE: Metropolitan Airports Commission 1985=1">86 Capital lmpr(n=&nt r-c;?affis Dear Ms. Gardebring: METROFGL;iA-. JOUNCIL Cicru;iinL FILE The Metropolitan Airports Commission, at its January 21, 1985 meeting, approved the remaining 1985 and proposed 1986 Capital Improvement Programs for its airport system. The 1985 Program had received Commission appro- val and Metropolitan Council review Previously, however due to modifica- tions since that action the remaining items ware presented along with the 1986 nrogram. A copy of the programs with sketches indize.* the areas of crosc=a --= is atra=ed. The rsletiowup of these proposed pro]e=s to a five-year plan Ls iodi.- rated on our five-year Capital Improvement Plan (1987-1991) which is also attached for your infptmation. If you nhould desire further info "Azica, do not Mate to conract apr office. V?V truly Yom, nn '' � BmICi .....+I'kCabe E)cmtive Director /jr attach. 9 Fr- ;E .')].1T; ON —RG:O :. .VE i - —NEc- . •• • ANOKA COUNTY-ELAINE AIRPORT 1985 Pro ects Overlay Runways, Taxiways, Aprons,.etc. - 20$0,000 Periodically it is necessary to apply a bituminous overlay on the run- ways, taxiways, etc, to restore the surfaces to a smooth even con- dition and improve braking conditions. Previously approved by the Commission, Landing Aids - $20,000 Appropriate navigational aide for the airport are being analyzed in order to provide increased safety and operational benefits. Previously approved by the Cw-ru-iission. 1986 Projects Building Area Development - $800,000 All available hangar construction area has been leased. It is pro- posed an additional area be developed, consistent with the Master Plan recommendations. An Environmental Impact Statement covering this project is currently underway. Previously approved by the Cmuission. Master Plan 1B Deve1paneat - 51,900.000 This project will move the existing nazth/scurh runway and taxiway system approximately 950' to the north. Also included in the project AU be the extension of the east/west runway to 40001. An Enn7uyr anal Impat r Statement covering this project is currently underway. Previously approved by the Crmn;se;nn, LAKE ELMO AIRPORT T4_855 erects Overlay Runways, Taxiways, Aprons, etc. - $250,000 Periodically, it is necessary to apply a bituminous overlay on the runways, taxiways, etc. to restore the surfaces to a smooth even con- diton and improve braking conditions. Previously approved by the Co®ission. ANQW COUMy-MAIME 1 Overlay Rwys, Twys, Aprons, Etc. 1 Landing Aids t Building Area Development f Master Plan 1B Development LARK ELMO i Overlay Rwys, Twys, Aprons, Etc. MUM i ACgd31tiOn i Airfield Improvements Ap-=&= ('lp�ranro NEW RH.IM AMPORM Reliever Airports Totals 200,000* 20,000* e00,000* 119001000* Subtotal $220,000 $2,700,000 * Previously approved by the Metro Council N AIP Eligible 250,000* $250,000 $0 300,000* 100,000 75,000* $475,000 $0 The need for new air.. ports to be determined by the Systems Plan update currently uudemy $11,845,000 $8,0500000 .rnellr tar+ 1 N II! \ ma IOH r/ \ wa•xo�•.olr •. /I r i p6W . IY i.J +il 11 i Y91MJ<Y 7$i riui •orl mronir.l��Y a qYr ,.ft 01 — I xtw 1. x Yrl[ la • _ - {i'M :rY r••W "-ter 16 �JG1,CP• �Tr,.. 1. � • i,. 11 at x 3 7g 16 1 .•VMrJ -7a is •� i= le_ II ^• :•Y�i i .1 .IM7l�• Ili I . I� I i ?fGIL dY 14ri JJII Is �4►il AI N :%" I '. pe y! i�+-�i 1! :ar aUrlvp mrn ill �. p nu+a or . [rax[ un PAN R A M S E Y C O U N T Y 1 ..gaol 11'.o1-M •o Nrr of l+'•'l •II• 11 at x 3 7g 16 1 .•VMrJ -7a is •� i= le_ II ^• :•Y�i i .1 .IM7l�• Ili I . I� I i ?fGIL dY 14ri JJII Is �4►il AI N :%" I '. pe y! i�+-�i 1! :ar aUrlvp mrn ill �. p nu+a or . [rax[ un PAN R A M S E Y C O U N T Y 1 ..gaol 11'.o1-M •o Nrr of l+'•'l •II• ® . CAP IAL IMPROVEMENT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN P106RAN PROJEC15 1185 1786 1907 ties 1189 1990 1991 ANONA COUNII-111LAINE 700 000 Overlay Rey+., Toys., Pgront, Etc. 20,000 Landing Aid+ 000,000 building Area 0evelopsenl 1,900,000 600,000 Muter Plan II Oevelopsenl subtotal 220,000 2,700,000 p 0 600,000 0 0 LACE ELMO 250 000 250,000 Overlay Reys., lays., Aprons, Etc. 150,000 North luildlsp keg Oevelopsul Subtotal 250,000 0 I50,Oo0 0 0 0 250,000 MAKE 100,000 kgeisitEon 100,000 I,000,000 500,000 Airfield Isprove+ents Approach Clearance ,000 _ Subtotal 475,000 0 11000,000 500,000 0 0 0 NER RELIEVER AIRPORTS The need for aee alrpor Is lobe delerelned by the Bysless Plan update cerrently es ee+y Annual Totals 11,115,000 1,050,000 II 2,400,000 500,000 1501000 3001"0 100,000 2 yr. Total 19,895,000 S yr. Total 11750,000 7 yr• fetal 241i13,000 s MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Director of Public Works/Community DevelopmeL DATE: March 14, 1985 SUBJECT: REVIEW OF CITY CODE CHAPTERS 48, 49 and 49A I have reviewed the Wetland Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 48, the Flood Plain Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 49, and the Surface Water Drainage Management and Development Control Ordinance, Chapter 49A. The subject Codes are used by my department on an almost daily basis and have served their purpose very well. I am not recommending anychanges in these Codes at the present time. SWT/bc MEMO TO: Clerk -Administrator and City Council �j FROM: Director of Public Works/Community Developmei� DATE: March 13, 1985 SUBJECT: STORM WATER MANAGEMENT (SWM) FUND CITY CODE CHAPTER 25 This memo is presented per your request for alternatives to the existing storm water management charge. Prior to presenting alternatives, a review of past SWM charges is warranted. Attachment irl summarizes some past SWM charges for development in the City of Mounds View. The attachment lists the development name, zoning, SWM charge, lot size and SWM charge per acre. The SWM charge varies from $500 per typical residential lot to over $35,620 for Tyson Trucking (4825 Mustang Circle). The SWM charge per acre varies from $2,000 per acres for a typical residential lot to $6,300 per acre for Knollwood Green Condominiums (2900-2914 Highway 10). With this perspective, this memo will now discuss alternatives to the present SWM charge. ALTERNATE N1 - ADJUST THE UNIT PRICE One adjustment the City could make to the charge is to recalculate the original unit price. The existing SWM charge was based on an estimated storm sewer improvement cost of $6,590,000. The City has conducted another storm water management study (completed July 16, 1984) that states the estimated cost is $1,500,000 excluding land and easements. The estimated total cost for storm sewer improvement including land and easement cost is calculated as follows: Estimated Storm Sewer system improvement $1,500,000 cost (July 16, 1984) Land and easement acquisition costs $1,500,000 (see Attachment M2) Contingency 10% $ 300,000 ESTIMATED STORM SEWER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT COST $3,300,000 The original unit price was calculated approximately as follows: $6,590,000 = S 0.153/sq.ft. 988 acres x 43,560 sq.ft. acre Clerk -Administrator and City Council Page Two of Three March 13, 1985 With cost indexing, which is provided for in the Code, the present unit price is $0.2351/sq.ft. Since the estimated sewer system improvement cost has declined, the SWM unit price could be recalculated as follows: $3,300,000 = $ 0.0767 sq.ft. 988 acres x 43,650 sq.ft. acre The unit price could be reduced further by increasing the acres. Attachment #3 is a copy of Page 48 of the City's Comprehensive Land Use Plan. By subtracting land utilized for transportation, public and semi-public, land, parks, lakes and wetlands, the land remaining is 1,876.3 acres: I $3,000,000 x S 0.041 sq.ft. 1,876.3 acres x 43,560 sq.ft. acre ALTERNATE #2 - MODIFY EXISTING SWM CHARGE CREDIT FOR NOT UTILIZIING� THE CITY'S EXISTING STORM SEWER SYSTEM Chapter 25 of the City Code could be modified by deleting the first paragraph of Section 25.04 and adding the following: Any owner or his agent, who applies for a building permit under Chapter 59 of the Municipal Code, shall pay a storm water management charge in an amount, as determined herein after, to the fund. If the applicant's land contributes storm water to a storm sewer needing improvement or additional monitoring (as identified in the storm water management study dated July 16, 1984) the applicant shall pay the SWM charge. If the applicant's land does not contribute storm water to a storm sewer needing improvement or additional monitoring, the applicant shall pay 20% of the SWM charge. ALTERNATE #3 - STORM SEWER UTILITY A storm sewer utility could be instituted to provide additional revenue and supplement the SWM fund. M Clerk -Administrator and City Council Page Three of. Three March 13, 1985 ALTERNATE, 14 - MODIFY SPECIFIC SWM Presently, staff calculates the SWM charge for each development. This computation takes a fair amount of time to complete. If there is some way to charge fairly for SWM and not spend as much time calculating, we should make the adjustment. One way to reduce the computation time is to charge a flat fee per acre for each zoning classification. An example is as follows: Average Existing SWM Charge Zoning ($/Acre) Possible SWM Charge Ratio* ($/Acre) R-1 $ 2,000 x 339 $ 660 ($170/lot) R-2 2,500 x 339 830 R-3 3,600 x 339 1,190 R-4 5,000 x 338 1,650 R-5 5,000 x 338 1,650 R-0 5,000 x 339 1,650 B-1 5,000 x 33% 1,650 B-2 5,000 x 338 1,650 B-3 5,000 x 339 1,650 B-4 5,000 x 339 1,650 I-1 5,000 x 339 1,650 *The ratio is calculated by dividing a possible unit price ($0.0767/sq.ft.) discussed in Alternate #1 by the existing unit price ($0.2351/sq.ft.) Staff requests direction on this issue. The following questions should help the discussion: 1) Should the City modify the SWM charge? A. If yes, should staff continue to calculate the SWM for r-ach development as we presently do or use a cost per acre depending on the zoning (or some other system)? B. If yes, should the unit price be $0.0767/sq.ft. or $0.041/sq.ft. (with a cost index of course)? C. If yes, should the owner of land that does not contribute storm water to a storm sewer needing improvements or additional monitoring pay 10%, 20% or some other percent- age of the SWM fee? What percentage should the owner pay? SWT/bc Attachments 1, 2 and 3 1 2 3 4. 12. ATTACHMRNT Al CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW SUMMARY OF VARIOUS PAST SWM CHARGES Development Zoning SWM Charge Lot Size (Acres) SWM Charge per Acre Typical Residential Lot R-1 $ 500.00 1/4 $ 2,000 Duplex - 2720 Co. Rd. J R-2 1,086.00 0.44 2,470 Kinder Care R-3 2,526.00 0.70 3,600 Christopher Companies (Apts.) R-4 27,641.54 9.39 2,940 B-Plex (M.H. Anderson) R-4 8,495.77 1.50 5,660 Knollwood Green Condominiums R-4 12,601.92 2.00 6,300 None R-5 None R-0 None B-1 First State Bank of New Brighton B-2 12,338.00 2.75 4,490 Mounds View Inn B-3 12,579.00 2.24 5,620 Burger King B-3 *SWM paid by 8-plexes 0.91 --- Self Service Car Wash B-3 1,400.00 0.50 2,800 None B-4 Bay West I-1 10,843.00 2.50 4,340 Tyson Trucking I-1 35,620.00 12.20 2,910 *Item 5 ATTACHMENT 42 ESTIMATED LAND COSTS STORM WATER DETENTION PONDS APPROXIMATE APPROXIMATE LOCATION SIZE LAND AREA 1. N.W. corner of Groveland Rd. and 250' x 250' 62,500 (sq.ft.) Ardan Avenue 2. Red Oak School site 300' x 300' 90,000 3. N.W. corner of Red Oak Dr. and 250' x 250' 62,500 Sherwood Rd. 4. N.W. corner of Long Lake Rd. and City Park 0 Hillview Rd. 5. South of Bronson Dr. between 300' x 300' 90,000 Greenfield Ave. and St. Stephen St. 6. N.E. corner of Highway 10 and 300' x 300' 90,000 Edgewood Dr. 7. N.E. corner of County Road H-2 and 500' x 500' 250,000 Long Lake Rd. 8. West of Long Lake Rd. between Co. 'Exist. Esmt. 0 Road H-2 and Ridge Ln. 9. N.E. corner of Long Lake Rd. and City Park 0 Ridge Ln. TOTAL 645,000 sq.ft. $25,000 x lot x 645,000 sq.ft. _ $1,465,909 of i i r sq. t. use = $1,500000 ATTACHMENT #3 r-) LAND USE SUMMARY • The current statistical breakdown by type of land use is listed in the table below. This table illustrates land use trends between 1974 Ord 1979. LAND USEAGE 1974-1979 1979 1974 % of Use %of Total Acres Total Transpertatian--` ' Open Space/Vacant _._. 20.2 27.9 600.0 �n a 25.6 738.0 Single Family 38.1 1,115.0 38.7 Two Family .3 14.9 56.8 .5 2.0 Multiple Family 2.1 2.7 78.0 2.7 Mobile Homes fvb4ie-end-3ermpvblic-- t 19.—,1T7— A o Parks_ ---.� Industrial •5 31.9 T. 1.1 Commercial 1.1 61.7 2.1 Lak —16-T KWO 100.0+ 2788374— 100.1 i •n .Nvl ...F ;LgNO oyl•z20 SOURCE: Midwest Planning and Research, Inc., 1979 i376 3 ACtii rvJAL -� At the present time, 26% of the total land area of Mounds View is vacant and undeveloped. A portion of this land is not suitable for development due to poor soil conditions. The majority of the vacant land is zoned industrial. Residential Patterns Single family homes dominate the pattern of lard useoge with 39% of the total land area. Much of the residential development occurred prior to 1960 (60%). New construction which has occurred in recent years, has been on vacant lots scattered throughout the City. 48 M MEMO TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCI FROM: CLERK-ADMINISTRATO DATE: MARCH 14, 1985 SUBJECT: NORTH SUBURBAN CABLE COMMISSION REQUEST FOR 1985 BUDGET CONTRIBUTIONS Attached please find a memorandum from North Suburban Cable Commission Chairperson Steve Schmidt and Legal Counsel Tom Creighton outlining a request from the North Suburban Cable Commission for a contribution from the City of Mounds View in the amount of $13,941.90 to fund a portion of the Commission's 1985 operations until such time as the Franchise Amendment Agreement No. 1 is entered into by all cities and the $150,000 indemnification from Group W Cable is paid to the Commission. At that time the contribution being requested would be repaid to the City of Mounds View in full. Should you have any requests on this item, please contact me. RECOMMENDATION: Staff would recommend Council authorization of an advance to the North Suburban Cable Commission in the amount of $13,941.90 per their memorandum dated March 8, 1985. DFP/mjs Attachment: OICONNOR & HANNAN ATTORNEYS AT LAW �1%'12131Q,�i 2800 IDS TOWCR ao SOUTH EIGHTH STREET p sit PC .I.a 6VA.M.Y1.Y1,.... a.C. 10000•8.43 P�C� ( ;Y�P��4P ."1400 MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA a5./02-22 �" iJ (412) 341-3400 COL..+.11+ TELEX 20-0E94 a1M• OIO..00 40103 TELECO.IER 012 34I.2800 (!ES) i1 .10 •.,00 VIWOVPI.1 THOMAS D. CREIGHTON moue I.Lima, DIRECT DIAL MUMMER Q1.11.00 MEMORANDUM T1m nw (all) a.3-1900 TO: City Administrators, North Suburban Cable Commission FROM: Steven Schmidt, Chair Thomas D. Creighton, Legal Counsel DATE: March 8, 1985 RE: 1985 Budget Contributions of Each City The Chair of the North Suburban Cable Commission has requested that I communicate with each of you regarding the 1985 city contributions to the Commission budget. As you recall, the 1985 budget for the North Suburban Cable Communications Commission was submitted to you in the fall of 1984. In that transmittal the procedures of the Joint Powers Agreement were explained that if a city did not withdraw from the Cable Commission by the end of 1984, the budget would be deemed to be approved. Some cities affirmatively approved the budget, others chose to proceed under the Joint Powers Agreement's passive approval pro- cess. At any rate the budget has been approved by all ten cities. The budget of the Commission has been funded in the past by contributions from each city based on their number of votes on the Cable Commission. After the city money has been transmitted to the Cable Commission, it is recovered from Group W as an advance on the franchise 10 r fees. However, as a result of the pending Amendment Agree- ment No. 1 with Group W Cable, the Cable Commission had decided up to this point not to request contributions from each member city. Amendment Agreement No. 1 includes a $150,000 indemnification payment from Group W Cable which would not be an advance on franchise fees and which would more than fund the Commission for 1985. However, the City of Mounds View has encountered, through no fault of its own, a problem with its Charter in its adoption of Amend- ment Agreement No. 1. That problem has been resolved and Mounds View is expected to proceed now with the adoption of Amendment Agreement No. 1. Although the Commission has no reason to believe that Group W will not sign Amendment Agreement No. 1, or that Mounds View will not adopt it, cash flow concerns of the Commission have resulted in the need for them to request funds from their member cities. The Cities' contributions will then be repaid from the $150,000 to be received from Group W. If for some reason the $150,000 is not forthcoming, the Commission will proceed to request of Group W, as has been the procedure in the past, an advance on the franchise fees. In either event, the member cities will be repaid either as an advance on franchise fees or from the $150,000 indemnification payment. Each city's contribution appears on the Attachment to this memorandum. The North Suburban Cable Commission would request that the City appropriate the amount indi- cated for your city on the attachment and submit your check to the North Suburban Cable Commission. Please submit your check, along with documentation indicating your expenditure of such funds (such as requisition requests, invoices, etc.) so that said documentation will be available for the Commission to request advance on franchise fees from Group W if such procedures would become necessary. Checks and supporting documentation should be mailed to the North Suburban Cable Commission, Attention: Gale Linebarger, Treasurer, City of Falcon Heights, 2077 West Larpenteur Avenue, Falcon Heights, Minnesota 55113. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. cc: Directors, North Suburban Cable Commission Bootsie Anderson, Cable Administrator Attachment Attachment 1984 City City City C t Population Votes Contribution Arden Hills 8,860 2 9,294.60 Falcon Heights 5,291 2 9,294.60 Lauderdale 2,230 1 4,647.30 Little Canada 7,590 2 9,294.60 Mounds View 12,870 3 13,941.90 New Brighton 23,269 5 23,236.50 North Oaks 2,990 1 4,647.30 Roseville 35,770 8 37,178.40 St. Anthony 7,770 2 9,294.60 Shoreview 20,800 5 23,236.50 J MEMO TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNC FROM: CLERK-ADMINISTRAT DATE: MARCH 14, 1985 SUBJECT: HIGHWAY 10 RADIATOR REZONING AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT City Attorney Richard Meyers has requested that I submit to you the language for a motion which he has requested that you adopt at the March 25, 1985 Council Meeting to comply with the Order of Ramsey County District Court Judge Harold Schutlz on the referenced issue. The motion would read as follows: Councilmember moves, subject to the City's rights of appeal, to comply with the order for judgement of the Ramsey County District Court relative to Court File No. 464143 Granting Gregory A. Johnson's Application for a Rezoning of His Property at 2865 Highway 10 from R1 Single Family to B3 Commercial Highway Use With Conditional Use Permit for Highway Auto Repair and which Conditional Use Permit for Highway Auto Repair shall contain the following restrictions: The erection and maintenance of a privacy fence is required by the Municipal Ordi- nance, the maintnenace of the property in reasonably clean condition, the maintenance of reasonable busi- ness hours for conducting his business, and a restricted use of lighting so as not to disrupt the enjoyment of property by residential property owners. RECOMMENDATION: Staff would recommend that Council adopt the above motion at the March 25, 1985 Council Meeting to comply with the Court Order and the indication to Mark Karney by Judge Flynn that this order supersedes the City's Charter and Ordinances. Staff would request Council direction as to whether or not this item should be placed on the Consent Agenda or the Regular Agenda. DFP/mjs AFT1 L. i U PROCEEDINCS OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA Regular Meeting February 25, 1985 Mounds View City Hall 2401 Hwy. 10, Mounds View, MN 55112 ----------------------------------------------------------------- The Mounds View City Council was called to order at I. Call to Order 7:30 PM on February 25, 1985. The Pledge of Allegiance was said. 2. Pledge of Allegiance MEMBERS PRESENT: Councilmembers Hanker and Quick and 3. Roll Call Mayor Linke. It was noted that Councilmember Blanchard was on vacation. ALSO PRESENT: Attorney Karney, Clerk/Administrator hau ey an ublic Works/Co:maunity Development Director Thatcher. Motion/Second: Quick/Linke to approve the minutes 4. Approval of o thF e February 11, 1985 meeting as presented. Minutes: 2 ayes 0 nays 1 abstention February 11, 1 Councilmember Hankner abstained from the vote as she Motion Carried had not been present at the February 11 meeting. There were no residents requests or comments from the 5. Residents Re - floor. quests and Comments from the Floor Motion/Second: Hankner/Quick to approve the consent 6. Approval of age- F—as presented and waive the reading of the Consent Agenda resolutions. 3 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried ?finance Director Brager reviewed his memo of February 7. Consideration 20, 1985 regarding a maintenance contract for the of Staff Memo City's dictation equipment Regarding Mntc. Areent on After questioning from the Council, Finance Director Dictation Eqpt. Brager reviewed the machines on hand, the use they Mounds View City Council February 25, 1985 Regular Meeting Page Two ------------------------------------------------------------- receive, and the fact that they had budgeted a blanket amount for all equipment in the office for repairs and maintenance in 1985, which this maintenance agreement could be paid from. Motion/Second: Hankner/Quick to authorize the purchase o a 'maintenance� agri<:,, .t on City dictation equipment from Precision Business Systems, Inc, at a cost of no more than $480.00 annually. 3 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Finance Director Brager reviewed that the Finance 8. Reports of Department had worked with the department heads and Department Council to finalize the 1985 budget and long term financial plan. He presented an overhead projection of the breakdown of disbursements of the 1985 property tax levy. Finance Director Brager reviewed the plans for the upcoming special election and the counting of the ballots. They will be having a demo counter in for the special election, and if Staff is pleased with its capabilities and performance, they may be coming back to the Council with a recommendation for purchase in 1986. The Finance Department is working on the year end financial statements and preparing for the audit. There is a part-time accounting clerk on board, who is working 20 hours a week, and is working out well, Microfiche readers and filmers have been purchased for the City, and they are working on filming records. Finance Director Brager will be working with a computer consultant in the near future to study the City's information needs, and hopes to have a recommendation to the Council by August or September, before the budget is approved for 1986. Police Chief Ramacher reviewed 1984 as a whole, briefly, as documented in the yearly report which was issued the previous week, He reported considerable effort had been put into training in 1984. Chief Ramacher presented overhead projections, showing the comparison of the crime rate for 1983 and 1984, with 1984 being down 10.8%. Chief Ramacher reported Sargent Hagen will be retiring in April, and they are in the process of hiring a new officer at this time. Chief Ramacher reviewed his plans for the Police Depart- ment for 1985. Mounds View City Council February 25, 1985 Regular Meeting Page Three -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Director Thatcher reviewed the activities of the water, sewer and shop departments for the fourth quarter of 1984. He reviewed the number of inspections done by the inspection department, and the number of permits issued by the planning department for 1984, as well as the activities of the Community Development Department for the year. Director Thatcher presented overhead projections, comparing 1983 and 1984 figures for the inspection and planning department, and the increases for the year. Director Thatcher asked Council approval of proposed 9. Report of Resolution No. 1872, in appreciation to Mike Lauterbach for service on the Planning Commission. Director of Community Motion/Second: Quick/Hankner to approve Resolution No HTT, a PublicpWorks resolution of appreciation to Michael Lauterbach, and waive the reading. 3 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Director Thatcher asked Council approval of proposed Resolution No. 1873, amending Resolution No. 1859. Motion/Second: Hankner/Quick to approve Resolution No. 8H amending Resolution No. 1859 establishing Policy guidelines for snow removal from sidewalks and for snow plowing damage to mail boxes, and waive the reading of the resolution. 3 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Director Thatcher reported Gary Kardell is out for a week with a back injury, and he will be hiring a temporary worker to help out, as needed, and will be bringing the paperwork to the Council at their next meeting. Attorney Karney reported that he had briefly reviewed the scoping . document on the environmental worksheet and stated that he will be preparing a written document for the next 10. Report of agenda session. He recommended that someone from the Attorney Council attend the hearing in Blaine on March 6 and represent the City. Attorney Karney reported a decision had been reached in the City of Mounds View vs. Greg Johnson, dba Highway 10 Radiator Repair, with the decision being unfavorable to the City. He reported the judge concluded the City must act upon the application for rezoning of the property from R-1 to B-3. He advised they will be appealing the case. He also advised he was served with an order to appear in court on March 12 to explain why the City Mounds View City Council Regular Meeting ----------------------------------------------------- Council has not acted. Councilmember Hankner had no report. Councilmember Quick had no report. Mayor Linke reported he had ridden with one of the Police officers Saturday night, and had a rather uneventful night. February 25, 1985 Page Four ------------ - 11. Reports of Councilmembers Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported that as a result 12. Report of of putting the new squad car into operation last year Clerk/ there is now a surplus vehicle, and Staff has Administrator determined unit 612 is in the worst shape, and recommended it be declared surplus and sold. Motion/Second: Linke/Quick to authorize the Clark/ n strator to declare unit #612 as surplus property and sell it for the best price for the City. 3 ayes 0 nays Clerk/Administrator Pauley advised the Council that he had received a notice from the League of Minnesota Cities that the Governor's office will be holding an informational meeting at the Embassy Hotel on Friday, March 8 from 1:30 to 4 PM, regarding the proposed changes in the tax structure. Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported arrangements have been made to have a demo ballot counter on hand for the special election on March 12. He asked that the Council be present to witness how the machine operates. He also asked that they call to order for a special meeting at 9:30 PM on March 12 to certify the results of the election. Motion/Second: Quick/Hankner to schedule a special meet ng or arch 12, 1985 at 9:30 PM to certify the results of the special election. 3 ayes 0 nays Clerk/Administrator Pauley asked for Council approval of the recommendation of the Civil Service Commission to appoint Jack Chambers as a police investigator. Motion/Second: Quick/Linke to appoint Jack Chambers as a po ce nvestigator. 3 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Motion Carried Motion Cai.,_!d Mounds View City Council Regular Meeting ---------------------------------------------------- Motion/Second: Quick/Hankner to adjourn the meeting att: �M- February 25, 1985 Page Five ----------------- 13. Adjournment 3 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried