HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packets - 1985/04/22CITY COUNCIL MEETING
PITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
APRIL 22, 1985
7:30 P.M.
A G E N D A
1. Call to Order
2. Pledge of Allegiance
3. Roll Call - Ouick, Blanchard, Haake, Hankner, Linke
4. Approval of Minutes: April 8, 1985
Regular Meeting
5. Public, Hearing: 7:40 p.m. - M. H. Anderson for Condi-
tional Use Permit for Flood
Plain Excavation, a Flood
Plain Use Permit and a
Minor Subdivision
7:50 p.m. - ordinance No. 388 Amending
Chapter. 48 of the Mounds
View Municipal Code
6. Residents Requests and Comments From The Floor
--------------------------------------------------------
CITI2ENS: BEFORE SPEAKING PLEASE GIVE YOUR FULL NAME
AND ADDRESS FOR THE MINUTES
--------------------------------------------------------
7. Approval of Consent Agenda
ITEM A. Approve Kitchen and Storage Addition to the
Mermaid Supper Club
ITEM B. Approve Plans for Pinewood School Parking Lot
ITEM C. Approve Resolution No. 1881 Resolution
Authorizing the Reduction of the Water Fund
Reserve for Future Maintenance and Capital
Improvements
ITEM D. Approve Resolution No. 1882 Resolution
Designating Retained Earnings of the Water and
Sewer Funds as Reserves for Water and Sewer
Main Breaks
ITEM E. Approve Resolution No. 1883 Designating
Retained Earnings of the Sewer Fund as a
Reserve for Future Maintenance and Capital
Improvement Projects
Agenda
April 22, 1985
Page Two
ITEM F. Approve Resolution No. 1884 Approving Just and
Correct Claims Against City Funds
ITEM G. Licenses for Approval
General - Expires 6/30/85
Midwest Fence and Manufacturing Co. - Renewal
Brovold/Larson Builders, Inc. - Renewal
Sprinkler Systems - Expires 6/30/85
Fairmont Fire Systems - New
Masonry - Expires 6/30/85
Morgan Masonry - New
Heating and Air- ConditionincQ`Expires 6/30/85
Royalton Healing and Cooling Company - Renewal
H. Approve M. H. Anderson for Conditional Use Permit for
Flood Plain Excavation, a Flood Plain Use Permit and a
Minor Subdivision
9. First Reading of ordinance No. 388 An Ordinance Amending
Chapter 48 of the Mounds View Muniripal Code
Entitled, "Wetland Zoning ordinanre"
10. Second Reading and Adoption or Ordinance No. 385, An
Ordinance Amending the Municipal Code of Mounds View
by Amending Chapter ?0 Entitled, "Municipal Water
System"
It. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Reyarding Kunz Oil
Company Development Review (Gasoline Sales Facility) and
Conditional Ilse Permit for 13-3, Highway Business
District Case 164-84
U. Appeal of Planning Commission Resolution Regarding M.H.
Anderson Construction, Property' Involved: (Silver Lake
Woods, Block 4, Lots 1-8) - County Road H-2 and Silver
Lake Road, Major Subdivision R-2, Single and Two Family
Residential Case 165-85
13. Consideration of Staff. Memorandum Regarding Ramsey
County Parks and Recreation Department Reynust. to
Excavate, Fill and Realign Sections of Rice Creek
14. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding Gale -Yost
Addition on Laport Drive
15. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding MSA 1985
street Project
0
0
[i
Agenda
April 22, 1985
Page Three
16. Staff Memo Regarding the Awarding of the Phase I
Greenfield Park Contract
17. Consideration of Memorandum Regarding the Hiring of
Additional Police 01ficers (information forthcoming)
18. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding MAC Response
to Comments on Scoping Document
19. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding Public
Works/Parks Maintenance Reorganizaton
20. Report of Public Works/Community Development
21. Report of Attorney
22. Report of Counr,ilmembers: puick, Blanchard, Haake,
liankner and Linke
23. Report of Administrator
._ 24. Adjournment
UNATPROVED
PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
~ CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA
Regular Meeting
April 8, 1985
Mounds View City Hall
2401 Hwy. 10, Mounds View, MN 55112
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Mounds View City Council was called to order by 1. Call to Order
Mayor Linke at 7:30 PM on April 8, 1985.
The Pledge of Allegiance was said. 2. Pledge of
Allegiance
MEMBERS PRESENT: Councilmembers Quick, Blanchard, 3. Roll Call_
Haake, Han ner and Mayor Links.
ALSO PRESENT: City Attorney Meyers, Clerk/Admini-
strator au ey and Public Works/Community Development
Director Thatcher.
Motion/Second: Hankner/Haake to approve the March 25, 4. Approval of
5 mI�$ inutes as presented. Minutes:
5 ayes 0 nays March 25, 1985
Motion Carried
Bill Fritz, no address given, questioned why a stop 5.
Residents
sign was installed et Long Lake Road and Hillview
Requests and
and asked whether the Council had authorized it.
Comments from
the Floor
Mayor. Links replied that it is a county road and that
Mr. Fritz was present when the Council discussed the
request and petition. He added that it was a county
decision to install it.
Mr. Fritz replied he had written to county commissioner
Bob Orth and asked who had approved the sign, and was
told that it had been requested by Mounds View. He
asked what was going to be done.
Mayor Linke stated that there had been a concern with
the residents of the area with slowing traffic on that
road.
Councilmember Blanchard stated it was her understanding
that the citizen who requested the sign had appeared
before the county commission, and she was not representing
the City Council.
Councilmember Hankner reviewed a letter Mr. Fritz had
Mounds View City Council 1� April 8, 1985
Regular Meeting Page Two
y Y ..
referred to, from the City to the County, and clarified
that the City did not request the stop sign but rather 0
asked the County to consider the situation. She added
she would be contacting Mr. Orth.
Mayor Linke requested copies of the documentation from
Mr. Fritz and stated they would discuss it further with
him at the next agenda session.
Motion/Second: Blanchard/Quick to approve the consent 6. Approval of
agenda as presented and waive the reading of the Consent Agenda
resolutions.
5 ayes 0 nays
Motion Carried
Motion/Second: Hankner/Blanchard to have the first
7. 1st Readitlg of
readingb—rrdinance No. 385, an ordinance amending
Ordinance No.
the municipal code of Mounds View by amending
385
Chapter 70 entitled "Municipal Water System" and
waive the reading.
5 ayes 0 nays
Motion Carried
Director Thatcher reported the City had received a
light
8. Considers
Street t
petition for the installation of a street
of
on the walkway between Quincy Street and Erickson
Petition
Road.
Mayor Linke pointed out a light on the walkway could
also light up back yards and stated he would like to
see it moved out to the street, where it would provide
a greater benefit.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley pointed out there is a
light on the walkway on Pleasant View Circle, and it
is very difficult to walk on one of the walkways at
night without a light.
Councilmember Hankuer stated she would like to know
the reason for the petition, and whether there had
been any problems.
Director Thatcher stated it was his understanding
that the residents felt the area was too dark and
they were afraid of vandalism.
Councilmember Hankner pointed out that if the light
is placed on Erickson Road, they would have to contact
the people to see if they were agreeable to it.
Motion/Second: Hankner/Quick to table this item and
Have staff investigate other possibilities to
resolve the problems.
5 ayes 0 nays
Motion Carried
_ -. .-a9 tpr:
Mounds View City Council I +k ii'r _--April_8_1985
Regular Meeting _______ �,____ �__�_ ___y Page Three
Director Thatcher explained that the only action 9, Consideration
required was to set the date for two hearings on Staff Memo Re -
the proposed minor subdivision. He added the garding It. H.
Planning Commission was unanimous in recommending Anderson Sbdv.
approval to the Council.
Motion/Second: Haake/Hankner to set a public hearing
for 7: 0 PM on April 22, 1985 and 7:50 PM on April
22, 1985 for the conditional use permit for flood plain
excavating and to redeliniate the wetland boundries by
amending Chapter 48 of the Mounds View municipal code.
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Director Thatcher reported he had attended the Ramsey
10. Report of
County hearing on five year street maintenance and
Director of
PubliciWorks/
capital improvement plans for Ramsey County.
Commun
Development
Attorney Meyers reported he had received a number of
11. Report of
responses to the letter sent out by the City
Attorney
regarding the zoning issues brought up in the Greg
Johnson case, and he reviewed some of the comments
received. He added that the League will become
involved in the City's appeal.
Attorney Meyers reported he had received a report from
Al Perez and had delivered it to City Hall. He added
the Council should sit down with Mr. Perez, after they
have had a chance to review the report. He also
reported the MPCA will be holding meetings to review
the noise rules and conditions set, and he feels it
is very important that the Council meet before the
April 19th meeting date to discuss their strategy,
Motion/Second: Hankner/Blanchard to have a meeting
wItN the Uty Attorney on litigation on April 16ch
at 6:30 PM.
0
Motion Carried
5 ayes nays
Councilmember Quick had no report, 12, Reports of
Councilmembera
Councilmember Blanchard reported she had attended
the Fire Department meeting and had been told
everything was okay on the pension fund. She added
they may possibly be coming to the Council when
their contract is due.
Councilmember Blanchard reported she had attended
the April 3 Planning Commission meeting.
Mounds View City Council UNARM,K ; April 8, 1985
Regular Meeting %,.„;,Y Page Four
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Councilmember Haake asked the status of the stop
light at Pleasant View and Highway 10. Mayor Linke
replied he had spoken with MnDOT and they will be
getting back to the City shortly with information,
but it appears they are considering a site about
500' to the west of Pleasant View.
Councilmember Hankner asked if a policy had been
written regarding copying material at City Hall.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley replied there is a policy
on what can be provided to citizens at no cost, and
as far as Staff is concerned, they have been given
guidelines to follow on what to print at City Hall
and what to have sent out, in order to be cost
efficient.
Mayor Linke reported they have passed the first
hurdle in getting a library in Mounds View, and he
will keep the Council posted on any further information.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported the Star Cities 13. Report of
conference has been postponed to September 11-19. Clerk/Admini-
strator
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported the City has
been contacted by the Met Council regarding a grant
application from the school district to fund a part-
time person to work with the senior citizen program
and transportation program.
Motion/Second: Haake/Hankner to authorize Staff to
send a letter of support of the grant application.
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Motion/Second: Haake/Blanchard to adjourn the meeting 14. Adjournment
at 8:32 PM.
5 aye3 0 nays Motion Carried
Respectfully submitted,
Donald F. Pauley
Clerk/Administrator
V't"" 5
9 ; Vn
CITY UP MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE IIP MINNESOTA
NOTICE; UP PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that tho Mounds View City Council
will meet on Monday, April 22, 1985 at 7:40 p.m. at Mounds
View City Hall, 2401 Highway 10, Mounds View, Minnesota,
55112 to consider the request of the developer M.H. Anderson
for conditional use permit for flood plain excavation, a
flood plain use permit and a minor subdivision of the
properties described below:
Legal Description: The west 178 feet of south 80 feet,
front to rear, of Lot 114 and the west 178 feet of Lot 113,
SPRING LAKE PARK KNOLLS ADDITION, Ramsey County, Minnesota
and reserving easement of record.
Anyone desiring to be heard with reterence to this matter
may be heard at this meeting.
- Donald Pauley
Clerk -Administrator
(Bulletin: April 10, 1985)
5
l' of II
MORAM VIEW
COUNTY ON RAMtiI•;Y
ti'I'Av. of MINNtSo'I'A
No'I'ICF of I'IIHLIC HARING
NU'PICE Is IIBNl:by GIVt:N that the Mounds 7:50 i'rmy atunril
Mounds
will meet on Monday, April 22, I9fl, at 7:r0 I.
View City Hall, 2401 Highway l0, Mounds View, Minnesota,
55112 to consider ordinance No. 388 amending Chapter 48 of
the Mounds Viow Munii:pal Code by redelinaaling a wetland
boundary on the wetland zoning district map.
Anyone desiring to he heard with rel,fn mcu b, this matter
may be heard at this meeting.
Donald Pauley
Clerk -Administrator
(bulletin: April 10, 1985)
CONSENT AGENDA
APRIL 22, 1985
The Consent Agenda is a technique designed to expedite
handling of routine and miscellaneous official business of
the City Council. The entire agenda may he adopted by the
Council in one motion. The motion for adoption is non -
debatable and must receive unanimous approval. By request
of any individual Councilmember, an item can be removed from
the Consent Agenda and planed upon the Regular Agenda for
1'1'I,'M A. Approve Kitchen and Stnrayv Add iI lun hi the
Mormaid Supper flub
ITEM 11. Approve Plans for Pinewood Hchoul Pirkiny Lot
ITEM C. Approve Resolution No, LHHI Rosnlntion
Authorizing the Reduction of the Water Fund
Reserve for Future Maintenance and Capital
Improvements
ITEM D. Approve Resolution No. 1882 Resolution
Designating Retained Earnings of the Water. and
Sewer Funds as Reserves for Wager and Sewer
Main Breaks
ITEM E. Approve Resolution No. 1883 Design iting
Retained Earnimis of the Sewer Fund as a
Reserve for Future Maint.erldnOO dad Upital
Improvemvni Prnjortti
ITEM F. Approve Resolution No. 1884 Approving Just and
Correct Claims Againv City Funds
ITEM G. Licenses for Approval
General -Expires 6/JU/HS
Midwest Fiance and Manufacturing Co. - Renewal
Hruvold/Larson Builders, Inc, - Renewal
Sprinkler Systems Expires 6/301/35
Fairmont. Fire Systems - Now
Masonry - Expires 6/3U/H5
Morgan Masonry - New
Heating and _Air Condit tnntne! = Expires-6!3D/H5
Royalton Heating and Conliny Cnmpdny - Renewal
MEMO TO: Clerk -Administrator and City Council
FROM: Director of Public works/Community Development
DATE: April 11, 1985
SUBJECT: KITCHEN AND STORAGE ADDITION TO THE MERMAID SUPPER CLUB
The Mermaid Supper Club is proposing to construct a 32' x 60'
kitchen and storage addition to the west side of the their
building. The addition will be south of the bowling lanes and
not be visible from Highway 10.
The addition will consist of a basement and first floor. The
basement will be used for storage and the first floor will be for
the kitchen.
The Rice Creek watershed District is in the process of deter-
mining if the addition falls under their jurisdiction. My
impression is that this addition is not under their jurisdiction
because a majority of the existing land surface that this addi-
tion will be over is already bituminous.
The Planning Commission reviewed this proposed addition infor-
mally at their workshop meeting on March 20, 1985. The Planning
Commission gives their recommendation of approval for this
-- project verbally because of the addition's small size.
A reduced size plan of the proposed addition is attached for your
review.
swT/bc
Attachment
I
i
J
I
PARTIAL FLOOR PLAN
»A��"T�•r 1
ARM
I
0
Mt7MO TU: Clerk -Administrator and City CouneiI
FROM: Director of. public Works/Community Duvelopmerlff�
DA'I'F;: April ID, 1985 �'�
SUHdEC'I': PINEWOOD SCHOOL PARKING LUT
Attached please find a drawing entitled, "Parking Alternate il2"
for the subject parking lot. The parking lot expansion will
provide a safer place for children to disembark buses and relieve
the periodic parking space shortage problem.
The parking lot expansion is proposed to be constructed by the
City's contractor who will he reconstructing Quincy Street from
County Road I to County Road H-2. The School District will
reimburse the City for this construction.
The Planning Commission reviewed the proposed parking lot
expansion and recommended that the parking area be shifted to the
south to save some of the trees at the north end of the proposed
parking lot.
The trees are on the School District property and do not come
under the jurisdiction of. the Planning Commission. By the way,
moving the expanded parking aroa to the south would cost the
School District approximately $3,000 more.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council approve
the parking or expansion as proposed.
SWT/bc
t .�
■ d•1
' K
• ?:AY CREA:E TURNING K
DIFFICL'L:'i IF LARGE
VEHICLES USE ACCESS
GATE.
v, fO'
jhf/3
BY MOUNDS VIEW PUBLIC
WMS DEPART::ENT
u
5�85
54799
5505
El
loo 1 75 1 I I 1 1 75 I 75 I I I I 175 _
--G--------- T lop— — —----- -—-
I
— - —�-�— - -�.— - E -i - to- -—�'--•f - -
25 I
r� J r•
l�4
r,• ••WILL REQUIRE
f 1\ REMOVAL OF EXIST-
I::G SIDFtALX AND
A lIININCS: OF M ry'
TREES
PINEWOOD SCHOOL
5500
EXISTING EARRING - 1D CARS
ALTERNATE i? - 45 CARS
r.
RESOLUTION NO. 1881
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZIN0 THE REDUCTION OF THE WATER FUND
RESERVE FOR FUTURE MAINTENANCE AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
WHEREAS, the 1983 & 1984 Water Fund Budgets provided
$89,416 for projects contained in the 1.983 Water and Sewer
System's Maintenance and Capital Improvement Program; and
WHEREAS, costs of projects included in said program,
approved by the Council, and completed during 1984 amounted to
$101,266; and
WHEREAS, an additional $11,850 is needed to complete the
financing of said projects; and
WHEREAS, Council has previously designated $33,614 of
the Retained Earnings of the Water Fund as a Reserve For
Future Maintenance and Capital Improvement Projects as a means
of financing projects contained in the 1983 Water & Sewer
System's Maintenance and Capital Improvement Program;
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Council that the
Reserve For Future Maintenance and Capital Improvements of the
Water Fund be reduced by $11,850 to $21,764.
Adopted this 22th day of April, 1985.
ATTEST:
(SEAL)
Clerk -Administrator
MEMO TO:
FROM:
ATF.:
RE:
Clerk -Administrator Pauley
Finance Director -Treasurer Brager
April 16, 1985
STATUS OF 1984 WATER AND SEWER FUND CONTINGENCIES FOR
MAIN BREAKS AND REPAIRS
The 1984 Water and Sewer Fund's Budgets contained contingencies
of $16,063 and $16,025 respectively for main breaks and repairs.
During 1984 repairs of water main breaks cost the City $3,843
(see Exhibit I) leaving an unexpended balance of $12,220 in the
Water Fund Contingency account. In 1983 the Council initiated
the policy of designating the unexpended balances of the
Contingency accounts as Reserves for Water and Sewer Main
Breaks. The present balance of that Reserve is $18,148. I
recommend that Council add to the balance of that Reserve the
unexpended 1984 Water Fund Contingency of $12,220. Such action
would bring the total balance of the Reserve to $30,368.
During 1984 repairs of sewer main breaks cost the City $6,646
(see Exhibit II) leaving an unexpended balance of $9,379 in the
Sewer Fund Contingency account. The present balance of the
Reserve for Sewer Main Breaks is $9,456. I recommend that
Council add to the balance of the Reserve for Sewer Main Breaks
the unexpended balance of the 1984 Sewer Fund Contingency of
$9,379. Such action would bring the total balance of the Reserve
to $18,835.
RECOMMENDATION: Council adopt a resolution adding the unexpended
balances of the 1984 Water and Sewer Fund's Contingency accounts
to the Water and Sewer Fund's Reserves for Main Breaks. A
suggested resolution is attached for your consideration.
DB/ds
Attachment
April 16, 1985
Page 2
EXHIBIT I
COSTS OF 1984 WATER MAIN BREAKS
Proiect No.
Description
Amount
622
Hillview-Jackson
$1,231.78
623
Woodale
565.31
624
625
Longview
W. County Rd. H-2
7.20
653.50
632
7800 Silver Lake Road
153.13
639
5445 Jackson Drive
1,231.78
Total Cost 53,842.70
EXHIBIT II
COSTS OF 1984 SEWER MAIN BREAKS
Project No. Description Amount
631 Quincy Street $6,645.57
�+ RESOLUTION NO. 1882
( CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION DESIGNATING RETAINED EARNINGS OF THE WATER
AND SEWER FUNDS AS RESERVES FOR WATER AND SEWER MAIN BREAKS
WHEREAS, $16,063 was budgeted for water main breaks and
$16,025 was budgeted for sewer main breaks in 1984; and
WHEREAS, at December 31, 1984 there existed a budget
balance of $12,220 for water main breaks and there existed a
budget balance of $9,379 for sewer main breaks; and
WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Council to establish
reserves for water and sewer main breaks;
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Council that
$12,220 of retained earnings of the Water Fund is hereby
designated as a Reserve For Water Main Breaks and affirms that
as a consequence of this designation the total amount so
designated is $30,368 and that $90379 of retained earnings of
the Sewer Fund is hereby designated as a Reserve For Sewer
Main Breaks and affirms that as a consequence of this
designation the total amount so designated is $18,835.
Adopted this 22th day of April, 1984.
ATTEST:
(SEAL)
Mayor
Clerk -Administrator
N
,,ff MEMO TO: Clerk -Administrator Pauley
UJ
FROM: Finance Director -Treasurer Prager
DATE: April 16, 1985
RE: DESIGNATION OF RETAINED EARNINGS OF THF, WATER AND
SEWER FUNDS FOR FUTURE SYSTEM MAINTENANCE AND
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
Pursuant to Council's direction I have prepared resolutions which
adjust the Reserves For Future System Maintenance and Capital
improvements of the Water and Sewer Funds. Thoso resolutions
adjust the Reserves to reflect the 1984 projects undertaken that
are contained in the 1983 Water and Sewer Systems Maintenance and
Capital Improvements Program. A detailed description of the
projects and the rationale for these resolutions were contained
in memoranda dated April 10, 1985 which were prepared by Public
Works Director Thatcher and myself. Should you have any
questions please do not hesitate to contact me.
DB/ds
RESOLUTION NO. 1883
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION DESIGNATING RETAINED EARNINGS OF THE SEWER
FUND AS A RESERVE FOR FUTURE MAINTENANCE AND
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
WHEREAS, the 1984 Sewer Budget provided $33,187
for projects contained in the 1983 Water and Sewer System's
Maintenance and Capital Improvement Program; and
WHEREAS, on December 31, 1984 there remained a balance
of $26,046 available for Sewer Fund Projects; and
WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Council to make those
monies available for future maintenance and capital
improvement projects;
NOW, THEREFORE. HE IT RESOLVED by the Council that
an additional $26,046 of retained earnings of the Sewer Fund
is hereby designated as a Reserve For Future Maintenance and
Capital Improvement. Projects and affirms that as a consequence
of this designation the total amount so designated is now
$59,660.
Adopted this 22th day of April, 1985.
ATTEST:
(SEAL)
Mayor
Clerk -Administrator
Q
7
RjI-:,O1,UTI0N NO. 1884
CITY OF MOUNDS VIL'IV
COUNTY OF M%SF.Y
STATE OF WNNFS0'I'A
APPROVING JUST AND COWIF.CT
CLAIMS ACAIWIT CITY FUNDS
WHEREAS, tho (:Ity l llu1Pu111)authorityoverView' theJfinancial affairs
Minnesota Statutes 1,12.241,
of the City and;
WHEREAS, The City Cuuncil has reviewed the claims numbers:
16606 through Jffo in the amount of $ 4$,luji--
15152 through 15833 in the amount. of $ E AF1 9^t __
16621 through 16622 in the amount of —
through in the amount of $
TOTAL AMOUNT OF CLAIMS PRESENTED $ 118,410.62
and has found said claims to be just and correct;
(list of NIy exception)
NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved that 'she City Council bOftMounds View
hereby approved the attached lists of claims dated ___
he
vote ayes nayes
ATTEST:
(SEAL)
Mayor
Clerk-P.dmin strator
ADDITIONAL DIRECT EXPENDITURES
CHECK
AMOUNT
CLAIMANT
PURPOSE
16621
$ 50.00
Cragun's Conf. Center
Conference
16622
147.50
Science Museum of Minnesota
Gadabout
$ 197.50
•f1TY F vr1'1'0S
VIFV A
C C C
L' A T S F A Y A F
L E C4-73-8°. FAFF I
S;-'
CFFC• c A
°' C U N T
C I A
I !° A N T
P !' f. P P S F
016t0t
E3203
NCPTNEFN
STATES FOYER CO
ELFCTPICITY
--016t07
3)Q33,5C
ft'Cl!P
F'FALTP PLAN° INC
CP['UP TNcUPANCF
i
°
Q]fECt
E,00
STATE
1°L6SL'PIR
SUPPLIESjCPIP.ATIKG.
O1E605
85.90
FIDELITY
+ GUAPA�'TY LIFF
GROUP INSUPANCF
"r
0.IHIC
2.10.CC
SUE°
APFA CI-. CF fnn ,
KFNP,EPSNTPS
u
i'
—Q1EtU
`t3.23
SVCC
IAES
PEFAIRSt-UTILITIES --
u;'
O1t612
S0C.00
DEPRA
DF.F hAGE00F'I
PRrGFAN INSTPUCTfRS
J
016613
1C.2C
FIN'FSCTA
ML'TI'!L LIFE
fPCUP INSIIPANCF
•
°—
_I 4
203,22
LPCIT
PFALTh FFC'T PLAN
C4'_'LF INSURARCE---------
.I.
016t1:
1011.17
STATE
TREASURER
PFNSIONS
z
01t6.I
33P41?.33
FTFST
STATF PARK nF
SALAPIESP PM'LAP
n
ANC-SALAPIFSITEKP+PART TI'''F
r
AND-OVEVIF.Ei .PEGULAR-------
'`:'016619
2p629.57
STATF
TRFAS - P E F A
PENSIONS
OIIt20
46.4E
CTTY
nF KfLNOS VIFk
RFFUKOS
•"I—_
13
4P/351,2L___tECESSAEY
EYPEKC.ITL'RES
SINCE LAST -C[UlICIL.eEf.TING. - —
••�•C•ITY "f '�.'1'� I;r r r r ' ,: t n V r ;I 1 F
U P P C c F
01`.752
3.59
ATfI
CONFUNICATIC'IS-TFLFPYONE
�;
e
o�
,
'
OI57S?
`5,2C
ALPIL4fN
SUPPlIFS1 STPFFTS
•
7.5C
ANFPTCAN LINFN SUPPLY
CC CLEANING-TCWELS t PACS
'
C15755
?Ce.tC
AKEPICAN OFFICE FPGD.
PIS( OFFICE SUPFITFS
f';e
.
01575E
31.4C
AFFPICAN Pfr CPC cc
SUFPLIFS#rPFRATIKC
''
'S
'10
e '
757
952.CC_
ASPEN INC.
TP.EF ?E!EVAL
-^ I
_
e
01575E
450,00
REACCK PPCCUCTS
SUPPLIES,OPFRAITNG
I
e
'tr--015755
FF5,C9
CCPY SALFS
"MISC CFFICF SUPPLIES
- ;}
qi
GNP-OFNTALr FCUTPPF!J
j
:e
g
7�
015760
le.P7
C17TFNS INC
SUPPLIES# VFFTC.IE
e
015761
11.92
DATA DISFATCN INC
CTF:EP PRCFFSSIGNAL SEPV
r
I�
o
015762
1E.57
PITA PCCKF!+
>'ItW-F
e -_
015763
?E4.0C
EL KAFKETING
SOPPt. TES#CPEPATING
3
'v
•
011764
93.65
J C AUTO SUPPLY
SUPPLIES# BLDCS+GRN.DS
ANO-RFFdIPS# VFHTCICS
13
AND-SUPFLTFS# VFHTCLE
Io
015765
419.00
JIKS PUILOINC FAINT
SUPPLIFS# ?LOr't4fFN,S
r
�i
AND -JANITOR SFRVICF
01571
3?.4C
I.IILIF 5I'SLP9AN 14FWS
SALAPIFS,TFFP4PADT TIfIE
^
_0_157n7
26..Of___l.1NCOlN
Ft RATER SERVICE PFFAI^S# ECUIFCENT _ __
_ i�
e ;1
01576B
28#618.36
FETPO WASTE CPN7ROL COMM C F F U N D
i
e
- _---------
-
AND -METRO WAITS .CONT_CCMM
015765
591.02
FICNFST ASPF'ALT COPP
SUPPLIES# P-LDGS+f,FNDS
® '
n
";
015770
25,00
FIVER DAVIS CC
MTSC OFFICE SUPPLIES
" Qj5771
31see --NPLS
STAR + TPIP.UNE
ADVER.TISEMEMTS-
......
035772
15090e
KN PFPT CF PUPLIr SAFETY
CCPKUNIrATICNS-TELEPHONE
im
e
!'I
03577?
100.1E
FGUNOSVIEW CUR DNN HDWF
----_-----
--�
SUPPLIES# PiDCS+GRNDS
���
AND-SUPPLIES#OPF.PATING
e
of
C1`,774
15.0C
FCUNDS VIFI PPINTING
PVINTING
�e
015775
23704
I� W FELL TELFPFrr•F rr
r."P0 TCATICES-TELEPHONE
C'IIY CF PCI-c vIF�
®: CFECK P ARCUN T
015776
015777
•
01377C
015779
1
j
pF C7576f
" 6157F1
A
oil,.
0157P2
C157F?
C157P.4
C15705
01`7F6
0157F7
0157RF
015789
015790
- CIF791
01579?
015793
015791
015795
01579E
015797
e f f f I_ N T' P A P A P L f C4-7?-F5 PATE
C L A I" t: k T o l; R F f S F
10,46
NFLSDNF CFFICF SUPPLIFS SUPPLIFSrCPFRATING
104,C,F
N'fV RPICFTCN Ff'4F
1l'PFLIFSrCPFOATII.G
A!:f-SUPPLIFS* Rl."GC+CRROS
46,6C
NEW PPIONTCN PFNT-ALL
PENTAL* EOUIPPFNT
4*762965
NCPTPERN STATES POWEP
CD E1 ECTRICITY
ANC-NATUPAL CAS
N .
..
A!,�—STPEf.T IICFTc
,
't
2*125.42
NCPTFFPN 57dTF5 PCVFP
ELECTRICITY
AND-5TPEFT IIGPTS
e
AND—TPAFFIC SIGNALS - FLECT --
---------
'
ANC-NATUPAL CAS
I
G53.3S
NCFTFEPN STATES POWER
FLECTRICITY.
•
Tz.
92.5C
PEPSI COLA PCTTLING CO
R E F U N P
34,9P
TIE' PANACNFR
PCOKS + FfRI!'PTCALS —
— --
4r330,5C
RAMSEY CCI:NTY TFEASURER
CC MI"UN ICATICNS-TELEPHONE ------
I
AND-SUPPIIESrOPERATING
a
,E--
919.3E
RECREONICS CCPP
SUPPLIFS*CPEP.ATING-------------=
a4
AST—FUILDIN(! + STPl1CTUPES
32.2C__
_ROAD RUNNER
GTHER PP.CFESSICNAL.SEP V------
'i
67,0C PAMELA S P.CSF. SALARIFS*TEMP+PART TIME
64E,31 S + S APTS + CRAFTS SUPPlIES*fPFRATTNG
4OC,0C____SEFCC LAPS ECUIPFENT
163,23 SMITE LUMBER CC SUPPLIES* PLOCF+fRN05
219EE
StaYfEPS
DRUG 5TCPFS
SUFPLIE;)rorPATIRC
2el,55__.
CITY OF
SPRIN:C LAKE
PARK CCLLECTIENS—CTHFR AGCYS _.
8086.25
SPRING
/.M PARK FIRE
DEPT GRANTS + SUBSIDIES
12?05
ST PAUL
POCK+°TATICNFPY FISC OFFICE SUPPLIES
'
AND—SUPPLIFSrrPERATING
75,63
PAUPEF.I:
THIFLEN
PROPPAK INSTRUCTORS
F..75
SANDRA
BEARDSLEY
PROGRAM INSTRUCTORS
?5.0C
DCUC BLOCP
PPCCRAF TNSTPUCTDRS
•�M. C•ITY c: 'rVNDS Vjrk e r F, k 1 c r c I C4-T:I-P° 4
C,rC; A R C. l `! T r, I A T / i P U P P C S F
C1579e
19e,E4
CFFPA CFE I•A,WrPN
PPCGPAY INSTPIICTCPS
0157Q9
132.5C
JFANN'F I e',1
PC:'PAY 1NcTP1'rTCPS
4_
01560C,
187.C2
NEE LELO
PP. CC PAY IMSTRUCTCPS
015601
292,0C'
DEANNA MrRTFNSCN
PPOGkAP INSTPUCTORS
C15F02
36.75
NAUFPFN PFArC
PerrpAN TNSTRUCTCRS
•
II
fl�_
cIFFC3
34C0OC
MAUPEEK PFILLY
F'PCCRAA' INSIP.UCTCPS
3 r,�
"
015eO4
25,4E
CCLUMPIA-GREAT LAKES CRP
SLIPPLIFS#OPFPATTNG
+`
C15P.05
280100
GAVE PCUN:TAIN
PTNF.F PPrrFSFIU.AL SFRV
n
0.15P0e
15c,CC
TIP NCLAN
CTNEP FRCFESSICNAL SFPV
".,
015P07
9e,75
MAPY THCRESOM
SUPPLIFSA VFHTCLF
C15ece
4c,oc
HAF'tr ALE%ANrrp
PFrUN'Ds
°"--.015Pf)q
2ti,4E
MICHAEL PAFNEF
REFUNDS
015810
9r513012
BAPTCN-ASCFP4N ASSOC
CTHEP FRCFFSSIOMAL SFRV
015811
25c,Go
CITY rF PRCONLYN FAPK
SUFPl.1ES,CPTPATING
k
01 M 2._
rt,ca
CCNSCLIOFTED CONIAINF.F
SUPPLIESW ERATINC-__...
I J°
r
015e13
18C,OC
DAVES TPAILEP SALES
SUPPLTFSr 0LOGS4GRNDS
°
C15E14
13,44
FL4 M Tri GC
SUPPLIFSAOPFoATTNC
015P15
1t.?,53
PUP ALUMINUM fCUNCFY
RPPLIESPMPATIMG
015elf
4C,Cr
POBERT KALSTFOY
PEFIJNCS
p
015P17
1CC,OC
LADY OF THE LAKC, IN'C,
SUFPLIFSrCPEPATTNO
p ,l
015ele
4c6CC
FAPK LAPSON
PEFUNDS -
0 _y
O1`e19
4C.oc
STFVFN LF.YAY
PEFUNDS
015e2C
4c,cc
PAY LIET7
PFrilIMS
-
016•921
4C.CC
FILL10 LEN
rrFUNCS
015022
95ee
TIP PCIAFFFPTY
"FUNDS
01`823
4C.00
;ECFR SNACMIr
PEFUNDS
MP24
F,aC
Fl11APITh !PlTu
P F. F U N 0
*I
°
+
. CitY'rc
DTI"
,!F►
L F T P A Y A P
I 04-21—P= pP..r� _
'
C P C O A"
r U F' T
C L A I P A T
p U R P r e F
•' �
g1
C1!P25
2B.CC
SCLAP AGF
P,QOKS + FrrIrp1CAt°
II
c15F2t
4c.CC
TCrr FTvr[TFP
PFFUNf'S
C1".F2T
42.65-
C. Al TFCMPSCN CC.
FP.INTffiC
•
C1SR2E
45.0C
TRCPPIFS E SPORT SPrr,
SUPPLIFS,OPERATTNC
P2C
4c,CC
USEPArY YAXkAN
FEFUI:cis
-- -- -
r
c'15F?C
25..0C
LASFELLE JCS.EN@Y-
R E r u t� 0
,
J
015P31
11.CC
PEG MOUNTAIN
CONFEPF•NCES
CISP32
60.00
PUREPT GACCF
GOANTS + COPSTnIFS
YlY,
"
015P33
.65r0C---_.ELLE6-SIPOSON
PEF'CSITS--PUILPINC USACE_.
82
65PE61.51
CFECKS WRITTEN
TOTAL OF
95 CFECKS
ICT41 I1F�213.]2
4' C
••e
i
• a
iy • ,
i
v+
ORDINANCE: NO. 388
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESUTA
AN ORDINANCE; AMENDING CHAPTER 48 OF THE MOUNDS
VIEW MUNICIPAL CODE ENTITLED, "WETLAND ZONING ORDINANCE"
The City Council of the City of Mounds View does hereby
ordain:
SECTION I. The wetland Zoning District Map as established
in 48.15, Subdivision I of the Municipal Code, is hereby
amended by reruineatinu tho wetland boundary for Wetland
I.D. No. 1-15 as per the attached exhibit.
SECTLON II. This ordinance shall take effect thirty days
after the date of its publication.
Read by the Council of the City of Mounds View on the
day of 1985.
Read and passed by the Council of the City of Mounds View
this day of 1985.
ATTEST:
Ma;6r-
CIP k-Administrator
APPRUVED AS TO FORM:
C1Ey' Attorney
r� •
ORDINANCE NO. 385
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF MOUNDS VIEW BY
AMENDING CHAPTER 70 ENTITLED, "MUNICIPAL WATER SYSTEM"
The Council of the City of Mounds View does hereby ordain:
SECTION I. Chapter 70.01, Subdivision 2, Paragraph (b) is
deleted.
SECTION H . Chapter 70.01, Subdivision 2, is amended by
addiny the following:
(b) Whenever a new water connection is constructed, the
owner shall pay to the Municipality a trunk, source
and storage contribution of $200 per residential
zoned property or the larger of the following:
1) $800 per acre
2) $2UO per 36,OOU gallons of water used per
quarter.
The property owner shall provide a water usage
estimate for approval by the City Engineer. If the
gallons of water used during any quarter of the first
two (2) years of water usage exceeds the estimate
approved by the City Engineer, the fee will be
adjusted upward. The City shall not lower the fee if
the water usage is less than the estimate. Such
contributions shall be reserved solely for the
purpose of funding construction, replacement,
modification or major maintenance of water trunk
lines, wells, towers or reservoirs and the debt
service thereon as specifically authorized by tha
City Council. (282)
Read by the Council of the City of Mounds View the
day of , 1985.
Read and passed by the Council of the City of Mounds View
on this day of , 1985.
ATTEST:
(SEAL)
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ry Attornry
Mayor
Clerk -Administrator
, //
Ic.
••1BMO To: Clerk -Administrator and City Council
FROM: Director of Public Works/Community D,avnlopmeryF
DATR: April 11, 1985
SUBJECT: PLANNfNG CASE, 164-84, KIJN'!, off, COMPANY
Attached please Lind the following:
1. Mounds View Planning Commission Resolution No. 127-85
2. Letter from Kunz oil Company dated December 19, 1984
3. Letter from Kunz oil Company dated April 3, 1985
4. Site plan
5. Landscape plan
6. Staff Report dated December 19, 1984
7. Planning Report from Northwest Associated Consultants
dated January 31, 1985
8. Letter from Attorney Meyers dated ,Tanuary 26, 1985
9. Brochure on the Armnr Shield brand of tank lining
The Planning Commission recommends approval of this project as
presently proposed.
SWT/bc
Attachments
MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISS111N
RESOLU'r[ON NO. 127-85
CITY 01' M(11*:P! "I!'!
COUNTY OP I+rU•IS""
STAFF OF MINNES11TA
RECOMMENDATION TO THE CfTY COUNCIL REGARDING MOUNDS
VIEW PLANNING CASE NO. 164-84, KUNZ OfL COMPANY
WHEREAS, Kunz Oil Company has requested City approval to
remove their existing building and construct a gasoline/convenience
store in the City of Mounds View; and
WHEREAS, construction of this gasoline/convenience store
facility as requested requires approval of the development and
conditional use permit; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the staff
report and has reviewed the report on the development from
Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc. along with information
submitted by the applicant which includes the following:
a) Development Plan
b) Site Survey
c) Project Summary
d) Evidence of Site Control
e) Landscaping Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has also reviewed this
proposal and it is in conformance with all Chapters of the
Municipal Code, specifically Chapters 40, 42, 49 and 49A, and State
Statutes; and
WHEREAS, this development does not need to be reviewed by
the Rice Creek Watershed District; and
WHEREAS, the Minnesota Department of Transportation will
review the development prior to construction; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the letter from
Attorney Meyers dated January 26, 1985 that states a City simply
cannot legislate a business out of existance; and
WHEREAS, the storm water control shalt he approved by the
City Engineer prior to approval by the city Council; and
WHEREAS, the Mounds View Planning Commission conducted an
informational meeting with the residents of the area on February 6,
1985 at 7:40 p.m.; and
C7
RESOLUTION NO. 127-85
PAGE TWO OF THREE
WHEREAS, the proposed plan has been revised to minimize the
neighbors complaints; and
WHEREAS, the neighbors not attending the February 6, 1985
meeting were invited to the Planning commission's informal meeting
on March 20, 1985. At that meeting the neighbors in attendance
stated that they felt the project, as revised, was acceptable;
NOW, THEREFURE, HE PL' RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning
Commission recommends approval of the request by Kunz Oil Company
as follows:
1) The Comprehensive Plan should be amended for this one
site.
HE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a development agreement be
entered into between the City and the developer which includes the
following provisions:
1) Exhibits:
a) Site, Grading and Utility Plan
b) Site, Development and Landscaping Plan indicating
size, number and variety of plantings, including
hardwoods
c) Site Survey
d) Legal Description
e) ordinance No. 49A 7 Year. Performance Bond of $1,000
f) Building Plans and Specitications
2) Security for the development in an amount to be
determined, and the security shall include viability
of landscaping for one year from time of planting.
3) Exhibit 2A to require the following:
a) Payment of all City expenses above and beyond
amounts previously submitted.
b) other items as may be required by the City
Council.
c) Maximum hours of operation shall be from 6 a.m.
to 10:00 P.M.
d) The underground storage tanks should, as a minimum,
be pressure tested according to MPCA standards
and meet or exceed said standards.
e) If the gas station is closed for l2 months, the
tanks shall be filled with sand by the property
owner.
f) C.-NrP, any trees that die shall be replaced within
2 months.
gl Sand blasting and lining of underground storage tanks
shall he conducted using a process approved by the
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA1.
RESOLUTION NO. 127-85
PAGE THREE OF THRICE
h) F. and I. two 6"-8" diameter inspection wells and
magnesium anodes attached to tank and test station
and Armor Shieldtm or approved equal lining inside
tank.
BE IT FIIRTHER RESOLVED that a conditional use permit he
granted which includes the above items;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council consider
amending the zoning Code to require property owners that have
underground tanks on their property test them according to state
standards on a periodic basis;
BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning
Commission direct staff to forward this resolution to the City
Council prior to approval of the minutes.
ATTEST:
(SEAL)
Adopted this 3rd day of April, 1985.
----- ----------------------
Chairman
Dirucior of Public works/
Community Development
a
ESTABLISHED 1966
THE KUNZ OIL COMPANY
Phone (612) 920•9373
5200 Eden CItcle I P.O. BOX 24107
Mlnneepolle, Mlnneeule 65436
December 19, 1984
Mr. Steve Rose
City of Moundsview
2401 N.E. Hwy 10
New Brighton, Mo. 55112
RE: Rebuilding K Station
2901 Highway 10
Moundsview, Mn. 55112
Dear Steve:
The Kunz Oil Company has been operating a self-service station
at the above address from the date of purchase, July 1, 1981.
When this property was purchased, from the Martin Oil Co., it was
with the intention that some day we would rebuild to fit into our
retail plans throughout the metropolitan area. We have remodeled
our station at 109th and Central in Blaine, which the council and
planning board enthusiastically accepted.
The attached site plan shows that we plan to remove the existing
building and build a new 24' x 54' convenience store, 1296 square
feet. 312 square feet storage S restrooms,984 square feet retail
space.
The existing 3 islands will be replaced by 2 - 4 x_3j6foot islands
allowing more room for the motorist.
The three existing tanks will remain with no additional tanks being
added.
Parking will be more than adequate with all parking stalls marked
and allowing parking stalls for the handicapped.
Landscaping will be provided to the satisfaction of the city, in
the rear of the property and on the east side, west side and front.
Grading and drainage will be changed to confirm to the city's request
for ponding areas.
ESTABLISHED 1086
THE KUNZ OIL COMPANY
Phone (612) 920.9373
5200 Eden Circle • P.O. BOX 24107
Minneapolis, Mlnnesole 65436
Page 2
The motorist will be protected from the rain and snow with the
installing of a 8 post 46' x 102' canopy.
Tire total cost of the improvements are not available at this time,
but they should be in excess of $300,000.00.
Your city will welcome these improvements.
Yours truly,
Dick Kraft
DKjs
Encl.
•
•
April 3, 1985
City of Houndsview
ESTABLISHED 1888
THE KUNZ OIL COMPANY
Phone (612) 920.9373
5200 Eden Circle - P.O. BOX 24107
Minneapolis, Minnesota 56430
RE: Rebuilding K station
2901 Highway 10
Moundsview, Mn. 55112
Attached are the revised site plans, building and landscaping, for the
above location. These revised plans encompass all of the planning
commission's recommendations and requests plus other improvements to
the site. Some of which are as follows:
1. A six foot high stockade type fence along three sides of
the property lines.
2. Landscaping plans showing location and size of trees and
schrubs. Trees and schrubs at planting will be:
a. Weeping Willows - 8 to 10 feet
b. Aspen trees - 8 to 10 feet
c. Spruce - 2,at 6 feet, 1 at 5 feet and 1 at 4 feet
Other landscaping is boulders in front 1 to 2-1/2 feet, 6
gal. junipers and 24" Hugo pines.
3. A crossection of the landscaping showing the screening of the
light area.
4. Reduced light poles to six feet.
5. Ponding, drainage and grading as requested by the commission.
6. Located building, canopy, etc. so no variances are required.
7. Trash dumpsters will have an enclosure.
8. Air pressure Lest will be performed on each of the three
12,000 gallon underground storage tanks.
9. Soil test will be performed to determine need for cathodic
protection.
10. Anode bags attached to each gasoline line.
11. Improvements will be made along the front property line with
curbing and landscaping.
12. The existing three pump islands will be removed and replaced
with two pump island covered by a 56 foot by 46 foot 4 column
canopy.
ESTABLISHED 1888
THE KUNZ OIL COMPANY
Phone (512) 920.9373
5200 Eden Circle - P.O. BOX 24107
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55436
PAGE 2
13. The present building will be replaced and relocated with a
1980 sq. foot more modern building with 240 sq. feet of
rest room and storage, 176 sq. feet walk-in 10 door cooler
and 1740 sq. feet of retail space.
14. Parking stalls will be provided, total of 15 stalls, allowing
parking , and so marked, for the handicapped.
15. Each island will have two multi -grade gasoline dispensers,
six hoses each dispenser.
16. At the end of each island a service center will be installed
which will hide the trash left by customers and none customers.
(see attached)
17. HOURS - 6:00 A.M. - 10:00 P.M. - seven days a week
364 days a year (closed on Christmas)
The Martin Oil Company has informed us that the existing 3 - 12,000
gallon underground tanks are 13 years old. They were installed in 1972.
Your city and the local residents will welcome these improvements. lip
E
• Easy Load Paper Supplies,
Safe from
Weather
• Disposable
Funnels
• Built-in
Can
Opener
• Wide
Trash
Opening =�
• Easy I
Access To'
Squeegees
• Easily Emptied
Plastic Container
0
• Removable
Plastic
Buckets
• Two
y Paper
Towel
Sources
i
• Non
Rust
Bottom
• Stainless
Steel
Surfaces
u.
STAFF C►f
�(1y' y M u d
REPORT Wlwr b M rdl 1
PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP REVIEW DATE: December 19, 1984
AGENDA ITEM NO: 1
f^ CASE N0: 164-84
APPLICANT: Kunz Oil Company
PROPOSED REQUEST: Applicant requests development review
/y and conditional use permit for gasoline sales facility
with a building of 1-1-M square feet.
,y LOCATION OF REQUEST: 2901 Highway 10
SITE SIZE: Approximately 0.80 acres
' LOT DEPTH AND WIDTH: 232.67' on Highway 10
A 50.98' x 100.00' x 144.96' x 296.75'
(5 sided)
IL� EXISTING ZONING: B-3 Highway Business District
� W/4� CONTIGUOUS LAND USE: Single Family Residential
(n
rs/
CONFORMANCE TO COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN: The Comprehen-
sive Plan denotes this area to be developed/redeveloped as
Medium Density Residential.
ZONING CONFORMANCE TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Existing zoning
does not conform.
L'
STAFF REPORT
CASE: 164-84
PAGE TWO OF`T,.RRE
PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS
Conditional Use Permit Section 40.18, Subdivision D(3) Requirements
for Motor Fuel Station:
1. All requirements of this section are complied with except for
the following:
a) Paragraph (b)- Is the proposed building and site so
dissimilar to the existing buildings or area as to cause
impairment in property valves or blight?
b) Paragraph (e) - Drainage system subject to the approval of
the City Engineer.
c) Paragraph (g) - Will lighting meet the requirements of this
paragraph and Section 40.04, Subd. J?
d) Paragraph (i) - Do the requiremens of this paragraph and
Section 40.04, Subd. H, of this Code meet the satisfaction of
the Planning Commission? ,,.
e) Paragraph (1) - The south drive entrance is existing and is
approximately 40 feet wide. Section 40.07, Subd. D(0)f
requires a maxim.:m curb cut of 30 feet.
f) Paragraph (n) - Are the noise control provisions acceptable r
to the Planning Commission? ... ,.... ,i;,,. 1. it„ _ ,
g) Paragraph (o) - Where will garbage be stored and is it in
compliance with Section 40.18, Subd, D(4)?
�'..h) Paragraph (p) - Is any outside sale or service in compliance
�`. J .i'.
is the development in conformance wich tho Comprehensive
with Section 40.18, Subd. D(5)?
II 1�" i) Paragraph (s) - Section 40.25, Subd, A(5) asks the question;
Plan?
Setbacks and Lot Requirements?
1. All structures, parking and drives meet minimum requirements.
2. The curb and gutter shall be 8-618 in of the 6" curb
indicated on the drawing\ r,
Parking and Access Requirements:
k.
j` iG
1. Applicant provides 13 parking spaces with an additional 10,
possible at the pumps. This meets Code requirements.
2. Commercial curb cuts are limited to 30 feet and this plan meet
the requirements. (
STAFF REPORT PAGE THREE OF THREE
r CASE 164-84
Zoning, Comprehensive Plan and Proposed Use:
1. The property in question is zoned B-3, Highway commercial. The
proposed use is allowed under a conditional use permit.
2. The Comprehensive Plan designates the area as Medium Density
Residential.
COMMENTS
Please refer to City Code Chapter 40.25, Subdivision C, which states
that in granting a conditional use permit, the City Council shall
finwith
ve
thedthat City. the use is not in
At the presenttime,�fthetproposededevelopmentiis not ninf
conformance with the Comprehensive Plan.
r IrI CIYIUIIHIVUUIYI
• Steve Thatcher
FROM-_. Alan Drixius _-- _
31 January 1985
ATE: NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS
Kunz Oil Company CUP Incorporated
4820 Minnutunka Boulevard, Suite 420
FILE NO: 134,01 - 85.01 — MpIs.,Mn. 55416 612/925.9420
Attached is the Planner's Report on Kunz Oil Company CUP` Please —
distribute to the City Planning Coumissiun. We should discuss the report ^
with the City Attorney prior to distribution.
cc: Richard Meyers
co
8s —
■1
northwest , mocr-d(.-- a Consultants,
PLANNING REPORT d �S
TO: Steve Thatcher
FROM: Alan Brixius/U.nid R. Lkhl. J
DATE: 31 January 1985
RE: Kunz Oil Company Conditional Use Permit
FILE NO: 134.01 - 85.01
BACKGROUND
Kunz Oil Company is requesting a conditional use permit to redevelop their
gas station/convenience food store at ?901 Highway 10 in Mounds View. Their
redevelopment proposal involves the razing of the existing gas station and ,®
the construction of an entirely new building and canopy.
ISSUES AND ANALYSIS
Currently, the site is zoned "B-3". Highway Business District. Under this
zoning designation, the existing gas station exists as a permitted conditional
use. While the Zoning Ordinance identifies the use as a conditional use for
this area, the Comprehensive Plan reamiends that in this area of the City
commercial development be inhibited through the introduction of medium density
residential development on the remaining open land adjacent to Highway 10.
The proposed Land Use Map for Planning District 6 supports the phasing out
of commercial uses in this area of Mounds View, showing a wedimm density
residential land use designation for the Kunz Oil ComPanY site.
The Minnesota Municipal Land Planninq AcL requires all city zoning to be
consistent with the City's adopted Comprehensive Plan. Tht! existance of the
B-3 Zoning District over the site ill question conflicts with the intent of
the Comprehensive Plan in that it prohibits residential development and allows
for the introduction of commercial uses that are intended to be phased out.
4
lfi;'0 rTlulne�clnk, I f llvfl. mint u�, q u ,h ,. I1lc u l ",� ll, t 1ff �1. 0 ',',� 10 tel G 14921 • ')-1
Steve Thatcher
31 January 1985
Page Two
With the application by Kunz Oil Company, the City must make a determination
as to the appropriate land use for this area of the City. If the City feels
that the Comprehensive Plan accurately reflects the City's ultimate develop-
ment goals for this area, the site should be rezoned to a medium density resi-
dential zoning designation. If upon city review, the City finds the Kunz Oil
request to be acceptable, the Comprehensive Plan should be amended to show
this change of land use.
Past City actions on similar development and zoning requests in this area of
the City (i.e., Highway 10 Radi,ilor and Holiday Gas Station) indicate that
the City has not waivered fi-omi the planning reconwiendations of the Compre-
hensive Plan.
The City has two options if it chooses to stand by the Comprehensive Plan
recomnendation and deny the Kunz Oil Company development request.
The first option relates directly to the applicant's development request.
The Mounds View Zoning Ordinance outlines the following criteria for con-
sidering a conditional use penult:
Section 40.25.A. (5)
(5) The Planning Commission shall consider possible adverse effects
of the proposed amendment ur conditional use. Its judgement shall
be based upon (but not limited to) the following factors:
a, Relationship to municipal comprehensive plan.
b. The geographical area involved.
c. Whether such use will tend to or actually depreciate the area
in which it is proposed.
d. The character of the surrounding area.
e. The demonstrated need for such use.
Section 40.25.8. (2)
(2) Criteria for Granting Conditional Use Permits., in granting a
conditional use permit, the City Council shall consider the advice
and recommendations of the Planning Commission and the effect of
the proposed use on the Comprehensive Plan and upon the health,
safety and general welfare of occupants of surrounding lands.
Among other things, the City Council shall make the following
findings where applicable:
The use will not create in excessive burden on existing parks,
schools, streets and other public facilities and utilities
which serve or are proposed to serve the area,
Steve Thatcher
31 January 1905
Page Three
b. The use will be sufficiently compatible or sep,u•ated by
distance or screening irum adjacent residentially zoned or
used land so that existing bullies will not be depreciated in
value and there will be nu deferrdnce to development of
vacant land.
c. The structure and 4ite shall have an appedratit. e that will
not have an adverse ellcct upon adjacent residential
properties.
d, The use, in the opinion ul the City Council, is reasonably
related to the overall needs of the City and to the existing
land use.
e. The use is consistent with the purposes of the Zoning Code
and the purposes of the zoning district in which the applicant
intends to locate the proposed use,
f. The use is not in conflict with the Comprehensive Plan of
the City.
g. The use will not cause traffic hazards or congestion.
h. Adequate utilities, access roads, drainage and necessary
facilities have been or will be provided.
These criteria indicate that consistency with the Comprehensive Plan is a
condition for approval. As such, the City has an arguement for denial.
The incompatibility of the cownercial use in a residential area adds to the
agruement for denial, however, this issue highlights the inappropriateness
of the B-3 zoning. This option is weakened by the fact that the proposed
use is the re-establishinent of an existing use that is consistent with the
established zoning. The proposed use also complies with the majority of the
other criteria for granting a conditional use permit.
The City used this option in the denial of a conditional use permit for the
Holiday Gas Station on the corner of Silver Lake Road and highway 10.
The second option available to the laity is to rezone the site in confornrance
with the Comprehensive Plan. This alternative is viewed nx,re favorably as
it implements the objectives of the City's Comprehensive Plan in accordance
with the Minnesota State Statutes. The Cumprehensive Plan, adjacent land uses,
and past City action on zoning requests provide justification for a rezoning.
Based on these items, the City's position for rezoning is stronger than if
they processed the conditional use permit.
Steve Thatcher
31 January 1985
Page four
'^ The rezoning would make the existing g.is stdtion a nuncunluruing use and
subject to the nonconforming use provisions of the hounds View Zoning
Ordinance. The rezoning would inhibit the commercial use of the site and
promote residential redevelopment.
The procedure used to implement the reroning would be:
Place a development moritorimm on the area being considered for
rezoning.
2. Conduct a rezoning study to detvrmiue the appruprlaty zoning district
for the area.
3. Process the rezoning in accurdauce with the City's zuniug procedures.
If upon review of the applicant's rcyursl., the City rinds the proposed use to
be acceptable and chooses to approve the conditional use permit, the following
items should be addressed:
Planning District 6 of the Comprehensive Plan should be. amended to reflect
a change in proposed land use.
2. The applicant's site conforms to the B-3 lot area and lot width requirements.
i 3. Site drainage plans must be submitted for review and approval of the
City Engineer.
4. The six foot high fence at the perimeter of the property is acceptable,
however, the fence cannot extend beyond the front building line. The
site plan shows that the fence goes beyond the building on both sides of
the lot. The fence should be setback in conformance with the zoning
requirements. Landscaping should replace the fence in these areas to
screen adjacent residential properties.
5. Building setback. The building complies with the 0-3 setback standards.
The canopy proposed over the gas pumps encroaches into the fronc yard
setback within 18 feet of the property line. The Mounds View Zoning
Ordinance makes no setback exception for these canopies. As such, the
structure is in violation, of Lhe raquirad setback, Three options are
available to correct this violation:
a. Revise the site design to comp;y with the established setback
standard.
b. Consider a variance from the established setback.
c. Consider a Zoning Ordinance amendment to specifically address
gas station canopies.
Steve Thatcher
31 January 1985
Page Five
Review of the site does not reveal a hardship unique to the site that t
would warrant a variance. Sincr Lhe canopies are conmion to motor fuel
operations, the City may wish to amend their Zoning Ordinance to
establish a setback exception for these structures. An amendment of
this type would establish a standard for all similar operations any
where in the City rather than locus on a single operation.
6. Landscaping to enhance the sil,e and screen the adjacent properties is
important if the use is allowed to expand. A landscape screen is
required in replace of the fence in front of the front building line.
All open space surrounding the paved area must be grassed and landscaped
in accordance with Section 40.0 /.O.(8) n. A ldndscape plan should be
submitted for City review and approval.
7. Parking. Based on a floor area of 1,296 square feet, the site is required
to have 16 on -site parking stalls. Thirteen parking stalls are provided,
three additional stalls are required.
Required
Use Gross Floor Space Net Floor Area Spaces
Motor Fuel Station 4
Retail (1 space/100 sq.ft.) 1,296 - 130 = 1,166 a 100 = 12
16^I
The parking along the east lot line is setback only 24 feet from the
front lot line. The Zoning Ordinance prohibits parking in the required
front yard. As such, a 30 foot setback is required.
8. Curb Cuts. The site plan indicates that site access will be provided by
two existing curb cuts with a slight alteration to the westerly curb
cut. This curb cut arrangement serves the site well.
cc: Richard Meyers
M
I
f
' ull Ina w la Iuaw
I�
' YWYela all 4tl lNlYtl al
Ln Yl10 YNMI altla
II
n�lllWlMnl wlll�M16
iVf o M. neI ilex
I
I:IINL
SITE IN QUESTION 1 141
W..NI f �yI r
�„ „_ 1 14 ma_.
_ I. = Ir II •,,cif •..aa
II h .� � :d •1 .,:� lom•
�r_�
V � f
.m.w P •II \V.'� . '.
I
t I iI •,YIMIII �: i �� ,a�.
• a •I y I � , � I � •I I " \
I l
If .•11 11 b II I� •.. I'.� a..
EXHIBIT A
SITE LOCATION MAP
III la.,I IIV
NORTHWEST ASSOCIATI I1 t ' :N:iULTANTS INC.
%JINL1 IVL V' ,
! 1ILA PUHI I I /•;,
u I
r
W
SPRING'. •;�' " , I
I•
LAKE I Mr,il
rl
PARK
W If' 9 I
na�niJ:, n) • I I I
IJ
Li
.proposed land use natural features*
flood plain/metro area
L.D Low densily tesidenlial I,�11.'.LyI designated wetloods
M D Medium density residantial i11W1�11 $laep slopes
M D/T Medium 1cn%;iy - bailer Poll. rice massing
'Apptax;nvilc loculions - til.ject to
H D High density I,:sidenti" l dcluilcJ review at time of i iopu:ed
dcvalopun:nl
NC Neighborhood eninmerciol
HC Highway commercial
IND Industrial
S.r S School EXHIBIT B
PROPOSED LAND USE PLAN
C Church
P Pork/public facility 183
I ('
Y. ...........
w111 'i,.n �........ vY
I n.11 I,r1
1 YM I,.� LroM.L .rl.. yr 1
n.w1 J •Kr•�ii... oY� ''Yb• .I . i ` I
pWrfNln 'lu•I / •DUI III'
1 11 al • .�\ I
.�J• MHnu r 4nw
FenceSetback
� 'u1 < u•. ':°"',
Violation
��� 'I'�d•...r Sep); ��
Canopy Setback Violation
1 ..,...... li�,.
�\ \ /,''' ••°'•'" ' ••°••^•, Fence Setback
Violation
Parking Setback Violation '"'
Replace Fence with
Landscape Screen
\ •', ,' Pnu.n 1.1•II .,11/ IIIMn'4
dl/ hrN
♦, FYI 'I '. }'�' /nv..1 N.
Ilw/I wf
••� \ ••7 11 .leau
r
/or u.r
\ 'r
EXHIBIT C
SITE PLAN
i
RICHARD MEYERS, P. A.
��. ATTONNLY AT LAW
IT$@ WNUS AWNUI
ST. ►AUL. MININIOTA EIIIE
(QT1) Of -III,
January 26, 1985
Mr. Donald F. Pauley
Clerk -Administrator
City of Mounds View
2401 Highway 10
Mounds View, Minnesota 55112
Re: Apple Valley Red-E-Mix v. City of St. Louis Park
Dear lion:
The above case which was decided on December 21, 1984 presents
a zoning decision that could have some input to us.
The Red-E-Mix Company commenced a lawsuit sucking to determine
whether or not a 1973 zoning ordinance amendment was invalid so far
as it provided for the elimination of red-e-mix plants as a permitted
use in the industrial zones of the City. Red-E-Mix was the owner of
the facility which was constructed in 1954. In 1959, St. Louis Park
passed a zoning code which in part provided that a red-e-mix plant
would be permitted in the industrial zone only if it were issued a
special use permit. The special use permit war not granted and the
court found that this was a pre-existing non -conforming use.
In 1973, the City adopted an extensive amendment to its zoning
code which eliminate 29 industrial uses as permitted uses in the City.
One such use was the Red-L-Nix plant. In 1981, Red-E-Mix engaged in
certain activities at the plant which the City characterized as improve-
ments.
The iseuo presented to the Appellate Court was whether the 1973
zoning amendments were void and unenforceable as to the Rod-E-Mix plant.
,,.,r_ Appellate Court held that :he 1973 zoning amendments insofar as they
re applicable to Red-E-Mix were void and unenforceable, and that they
0.1.111 be permitted to fully operate its facilities as a pre-existing
r.o.i-conforming use. Further, that the 1973 changes are void and unen-
locceabie against this Red-E-Mix plant.
Tie court held that absent a court determination that the Red-E-Mix
plant is a public nuisance or a nuisance per se, a city simper cannot
legislate a business out of existence_
Page 2
I anticipate we may be facing some similar questions in Want /
near future
relative
remodeledcertain
evenbthoughsthetComprehensive Mivities that unicipal
to be expanded to prohibit such expansion- Unfortunately,
Plan would appearSt. Louis Park since the
Red-E-Mix case was not handled well by improvements were authorized
issue of whether or not Red-E-MI imp
d D
oallowable
was
mstthat1theeCity overl1 this ookedcular case because of
procedural our zoning and
You may want to distribute this opinion to y
building code staff as well as the Planning Commission for their
information.
Yours, truly,
L Richard Meyers
i
RM/ew
1 9
L-1
4telbo
Service Station Tanks
PERMANENT REPAIR OF LEAKING TANKS AT 50% OF REPLACEMENT COSTS!
PERMANENT REPAIR OF LEAKING TANKS — corrosion inside is ended and leaks eliminated.
STATION IS ALWAYS OPEN FOR BUSINESS — tank is repaired underground, from the inside with no large
excavation needed, 4 x 4 hole to the top of the tank. Four tanks at the same location can be repaired in 2 days
with gas always at the pump. Tanks can be repaired in any weather condition.
GASOLINE STAYS CLEAN — Armor Shield lining eliminates product contamination, tank stays free from sludge
build up for years.
Up to a 10 year Guarantee on material and workmanship is available on an ARMOR SHIELD® tank.
SPECIAL SERVICES
SAND BLASTING & PAINTING — service is available for
other applicat;ons.
TANK CLEANING AND TESTING —by trained men who
often find failures that might not have been detected.
ARMOR SHIELD LINED TANKS ARE
MAINTENANCE FREE
AN INVESTMENT NOT A LIABILITY.
ARMOR SHIELD, INC. / 3141 READING ROAD/ CINCINNATI, OHIO 45229 / (513) 281.5100
DISCUSSION OF CORROSION AREAS FOR UNDERGROUND TANKS
Information based on 40 years of study by the
National Bureau of Standards, and a INN
nationwide survey of oil companies, utilities,
pipe line companies, natural gas transmission
and distribution systems, and communications
companies is reflected In this corrosion map.
The survey was made by the Hlnchman Co.,
Corrosion Engineers, Detroit, Michigan.
In most of the black areas the average life of
unprotected steel tanks Is less than 10 years. In
the gray • less than 20 years.
The seriousness of the corrosion problem is
Indicated by the fact that TO pot. of those
participating In the recent nationwide survey,
Install corrosion protection materials on all new
underground metallic structures.
To further assist you In determining where
potential corrosion problems may be found we
are listing some of the causative and
contributing factors.
CORROSION FACTORS
External
Soil Resitivlty
Landfill • Organic Material
Water Table
Stray Currents
Soil pH
Bacteria
De4cInizers
Salta
Septic
Cindery
Cinders
SulphureFrom Mining Areas
Underground corrosion Is the result of many
variables and therefore hard to predict. Testing for
soil resistivity Is one measure of soil corroslvlty
but, Is not the only factor to be considered In
evaluating the corrosivity of an environment. Soil$
with resistivity above 10,000 ohm centimeters may
be corrosive because of other environmental
factors such as acidity, stray currents, newly
Installed septic tanks, etc.
You may be able to add to the areas of high
corrosion from your own experience, your own
records of underground tank replacements or
Information from pipe line companies, utilities or
other firms who bury metallic sturctures In your
area.
Special attention should be given to metropolitan
areas due to the many landfill building sites.
Turnpike sites with septic tanks are also potential .
corrosion areas.
Common sense is an Important as testing In
determining locations where corrosion could be a
serious problem.
Armor Shield resins will not rust or corrode when
exposed to moisture and chemicals found In the
soil. Lengthy experience of Reinforced Plastics In
much more highly corrosive environments such
as boats, salt water pipe lines, automobile bodies,
assure long life expectancy.
Internal Armor Shield tanks are maintenance free -an
Investment not a Ilabllilya permanent cure to
wnrar Additives,.,,rrnarnnoroblems:not atemporaryremedy.
CALL(YOURTOTALAUTHORIZED
SUPPLIERrn�.
FOR MATERIAL, EQUIPMENT, APPLICATION
•
Armor Tank hiring, hu!.
5333 University Ave. PIE
Minneapolis, Mlnnesoia!,54? i
(612)•571.101.-7
Armor
4ftib(2)
SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE REPAIR OF
TANKS BY COATING WITH POLYESTER RESINS
I, GENERAL
A. In addition to obtaining permits, etc., the Contractor will obtain the approval of
the Local Fire Marshal and/or other regulating authorities, where required.
B. The scope of the contract covers a turnkey job including, but not limited to,
excavation, opening tank, safe removal and disposal of bottom sediment and
water, tank surface preparation, coating application, testing, closing tank and
finishing of grade to its original surface.
C. Armor Shield's instructions are to be followed in the handling, mixing and
application of the resin compounds.
D. There will be a Contractor's employee on hand at all times, who understands lead
hazard and the fire and explosion potential and he will be responsible for
maintaining a safe environment in the work area.
E. The Contractor shall be familiar and comply with the relevant procedures
established by all Federal, State and Municipal mandates.
F. Owner or its agent will remove the free product from the tank, leaving the
bottom sediment and water for removal, by the Contractor. Bottom sediment and
water shall be disposed of in a safe manner that is acceptable to the Local, State
an Federal regulatory agencies.
G. Before any work is done, the work area is to be barricaded and the required
Danger and Caution signs posted. The area is to be kept free of sources of ignition
during the work period.
H. The Contractor will have on hand, a properly maintained and tested portable fire
extinguisher, with a minimum Underwriter Laboratory extinguisher rating of 12
B.
II. PURGING THE TANK OF FLAMMABLE VAPORS
A. The tank is to be isolated from any flammable vapor source before work begins.
Tanks that are manifolded togther create a prevalent danger in that explosive
vapors can infiltrate a tank after it has been purged. Submersible pumps must be
removed and openings plugged. Lines that may be common to other storage
tanks, such as suction, syphon and vent lines, are to blanked. The Contractor
must be aware that it is common practice to manifold vent lines at locations
where the tanks have been adapted for vapor recovery.
B. The tank shall be purged of flammable vapors by use of an air mover constructed
of light gauge metal of the venturi (jet) type, or low pressure blower. Air movers
located in the possible path of vapor travel shall be driven by steam, air or
explosion proof electric motors. The apparatus used to inject the air is to be
bonded to the tank.
C. Purging is to continue as long as tests show vapors in the flammable range are
contained in the tank.
D. Tests for flammable vapors are to be made with a Combustible Gas Indicator,
immediately before cutting or drilling and frequently during the course of the
work. Vapor samples are to be taken in the excavation and at the top, middle and
bottom of the tank at each testing. It is essential that the operator using the
indicator be well schooled in the use of the Combustible Gas Indicator and that he
perform the checks recommended by the manufacturer to insure that the
instrument is in good condition prior to the beginning of each work day.
E. Hot work, such as drilling or cutting, shall not be performed when flammable
vapors are indicated in the excavation or in the tank. Combustible Gas Indicator
readings above 20 Lower Explosion Limit (LEL) are to be considered explosive.
III. OPENING THE TANK
Afler it is determined that a sate atmosphere has been established, the tank may
be opened. If cutting and drilling are necessary, the tools are to be air operated or
run by explosion proof electric motors and bonded to the tanks.
IV. CLEANING AND SURFACE PREPARATION
A. Employees entering the tank and those handling tank sludge, will be fully
clothed so that arms, legs, head and torso are protected from contact with the
tank residue and the coating resins and shall wear oil and water resistant boots
and gloves. In addition, protective respiratory equipment providing positive air
pressure, in a full facepiece mask, will be worn by those entering the tank before
and during bottom sediment and water removal, sandblasting and removal of
residue and during the coating application. Protective equipment shall be
provided, used and maintained in a sanitary and reliable condition. Persons
harnesses tand safety lines and standby emplirators are oyees villtlbe avl be ailable, who are d with fety
Communicatable of ions shall be maintaom ined between the workers and stand -bye tank, in the event of an
employees.
B. Inspection of the interior may be made with one of several forms of internal
inspection lamps or fldshlights approved for Class 1, Division I, Group D, hazard
locations, or a mirror may be used to reflect light into the container.
C. Pumps used for the removal of bottom sediment and water- shall be explosion
proof. Shovels used to remove solid sludge shall be of the non-ferrous or
sparkproof type.
D. The interior tank surfaces are to be sandblasted to a while -petal finish. The
shovels used to remove the residue shall be sparkproof as in 1V. C., above. All
Corrosion, scale, sand and dirt must be removed. Sandblasting, revoval of sand
and scale and wiping, are to be scheduled for one continuous operation.
E. Holes are to be located and plugged with boiler plugs, base resin, trowel materialand
smooth,trounded,tcogered surface for betterlapplicat un of the spray coat. a w
V. APPLICATION
A. The coating resins should he applied immediately after the sandblasting operation
is completed, but application must begin no later than 16 hours following and
before, any visible rusting occurs. If visible rusting is apparent, additional surface
preparation will be required up to and including resandblasting, at the discretion
of the engineer supervising the work.
B. The final spray coat is to average 15o mils thick and in no case, less than 125
mils, and is to be free of runs, pin holes or other defects.
C. The applied resin is to be allowed to cure for the time period and at the
temperature specified by Armor Shield, before product is reintroduced into the
tank.
V1. INSPECTION
A. The Contractor is to notify owner of the Scheduled starting time for the
application process so that, if desired, an inspection of fhe sandblasted surface can
be made.
B. The Contractor is to notify owner of the time scheduled for closing the tank, so
that an inspecton of the coated surface can be made.
VIL CLOSING
A. Where no hatch cover exists and a manhole has been cut out, the tank is to be
sealed by the following method:
using an oversized cover plate, having the same thickness as the tank, and
overlapping the hole 2' on each side, bolt the plate securely over the opening
through pre -drilled holes on 4" centers. Trowel material is to be applied around
the opening to provide a seat for the cover plate. The cover plate is to be pre-
formed to the curve of the tank and fit snugly to the tank surface at the plate
edge. The plate and surrounding tank surfaces are to be sandblasted, the plate
edge and bolts filled and rounded as in 4. E., and the entire area coated with
trowel material or spray coat.
B. Allow the plate coating to cure. Fill the excavalon. All rubbish and debris shall
be removed from the site and the work area swept clean.
�� Ig
MEMO TO: Clerk -Administrator and City Council
FR('M: Director of Public Works/Community Development
DATE: April 11, 1985
SUBJECT: PLANNING CASE. 146-84, M. H. ANDERSON CONSTRUCTION
MAJOR SUBDIVISION, SILVER LAKE WOODS, BLOCK 4,
LOTS 1-8 (COUNTY ROAD H-2 AND SILVER LAKE ROAD)
Attached please find Planning Commission Resolution No. 129-85 on
the subject major subdivision. Also find attached a drawing of
the proposed subdivision.
City Code requires that an an interior lot zoned R-1 have a
minimum frontage of 75 feet. The Code also requires that a
corner lot zoned R-1 have a minimum frontage of 100 feet. The
developer requests a variance (based on density) from the
requirements because there will be 14 dwelling units in the
proposed R-1 zone instead of 16 dwelling units in the existing
R-2 zone.
The Planning Commission reviewed the proposed cost of housing on
the smaller lots. Staff and the Planning Commission believe that
the cost savings for purchasing a house was not much different
than buying a typical house on a larger lot.
The Planning Commission told the developer that he could apply
for a planned unit development and receive density bonuses per
the Code. Under the planned unit development, the developer said
he could only install 11 single family lots and that he did not
want to proceed under the planned unit development procedures.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff and Planning Commission strongly recommend
denial of this request.
SWT/bc
Attachment
MOUNDS VIEW PI,ANNIN(; COMMISSION
1(1:5OI.O'l'ION No, 129-85
CI'I'y OF MOUNDS VIEW '
COUNTY OF RAMEY
STATE: OF' MINNESOTA
RECOMMENDATION To 'rHE CITY COUNCIL REGARDING
PLANNING CASE 146-84, M. H. ANDERSON CONSTRUCTION,
MAJOR SUHDIVISION, SILVER LAKE WOODS, BLOCK 4, LOTS 1-8
(COUNTY ROAD H-2 AND SILVER LAKE ROAD)
WHEREAS, M. H. Anderson Construction has requested City
cpproval of a major subdivsion and rezoning; and
ds, Block 4, has 8 lots zoned R-2;
WHEREAS, Silver Lake Woo
and
WHEREAS, the request is to subdivide the property into 14
lots zoned R-1; and
I lots are, narrower than the Zoning
WHEREAS, the proposed R-
Code requirements; and
WHEREAS, the Developer requosts a varice based on density;
based on density,
and the City has nover granted a variance request
ds view
he
NOW, cd�inial ofyLheFlreglucsttd ihy M.. N. Andersonanni��
Commission reommends
Construction to subdivide the land as presenten the drawings
received by the City on January 30, 1985;
BE rr FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning
Commission does not object to rezoning the prop Y
to R1;
HE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a lot frontage variance based on
density is denied;
HE 1'r FINALLY RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning
Commission directs staff to forward this resolution to the City
Council prior to approval of the minutes.
ATTEST:
Adopted this 3rd day of April, 1985.
Chairperson
(SEAL)
Directc,r of Public Works/
Community Development
MEMO TO: Clerk -Administrator and City Council
FROM: Director of Public Works/Community Deve lopme/t�
'
DATE: April 11, 1985
SUBJECT: RAMSEY COUNTY PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT REQUEST
TO EXCAVATE., FILL AND REALIGN SECTIONS OF RICE. CREEK
Attached please find Mounds View Planning Commission Resolution
No. 128-85 and a 22" X 34" drawing of the subject project. If
the resolution meets your approval you could adopt a resolution
virtually identical to the Planning Commission's resolution.
If you have any questions, please contact me.
SWT/bc
MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. 128-85
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL REGARDING THE PROPOSAL BY
RAMSEY COUNTY PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT DATED MARCH 6,
1985 TO CONSTRUCT A TRAIL ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF RICE CREEK
WHEREAS, Ramsey County Parks and Recreation Department has
submitted a letter requesting approval to realign the Rice Creek
channel, backfill the vacated Rice Creek channel, and construct an
elevated trail bed on the south side of Rice Creek; and
WHEREAS, this work will he part of the Rice Creek north
regional trail corridor; and
WHEREAS, this land is not located in the flood plain; and
WHEREAS, this work is in a designated wetland zone in the
City of Mounds View; and
WHEREAS, a wetland conditional use permit is required for
this work; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission believes this trail will be
a benefit to the community; and
WHEREAS, this work will
channel banks and steep slopes
and
eliminate existing severe erosion of
immediately adjacent to Rice Creek;
WHEREAS, this work will provide and unimpeded trail bad of
reasonable grading for a public multi -use regional recreational
trailway (i.e., hiking, biking, cross-country skiing and canoeing)l
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning
Commission recommends approval of this project contingent on the
following:
1) Approval from the Department of Natural Resources
2) Approval from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
3) Approval from Rice Creek Watershed District
4) Approval from the City of New Brighten
5) Construction of the proposed realignment of Old
Highway 8 at the same time as the realignment of
Rice Creek Channel
RESOLUTION NO. 128-85
PAGE TWO OF TWO
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning
Commission direct staff to forward this resolution to the City
Council prior to approval of the minutes.
Adopted this day of
ATTEST:
(SEAL)
, 1985.
Chairman
Director of Public Works
Community Development
MEMO TO: Clerk -Administrator and City Council
FROM: Director of public Works/Community Devr.lopmP.nJJ,
DATE: April 10, 1985 /��''
SUBJECT: GALE-YOST ADDITION ON LAPORT DRIVE
Attached please find a copy of the plans for the subjectkproct
jethe
and Resolution No. 1766 dated July 9, 19H4. As Y Y
resolution directed staff to prepare
the
splans
ndtions care ccomplete
for the subject project. The p and
and are attached for your review, comment and/or approval.
Financing for the project (estimated construction cost $25,000) is
proposed to come from the City's revolving improvement fund. This
fund is set up under City Code Chapter 20.02. The fund has a
sufficient balance to cover the cost of the project. The cost of
the project is proposed
to be eriodassessed to ResolutiontNo.he p1766rrequiresty sthatat ll
percent over a lU yearperiod. b the City in an amount
the petitioner submit a security approvedY
equal to 3 years payment of assessments on the entire project prior
to ordering and awarding the project for construction. The
security will assure that the City will receive 3 years worth of
payments. When the property is sold, hopefully within 3 years, the
assessment will be paid off at that time. The dollar amount ofthe
security or bond required prior to awarding the project is appo
mately $10,000.
ACTION REQUIRED: Revise and/or approve the plans and specifica-
tions,�ect staff to schedule
bid
fromopening
the date,
and
ta Pdirect
on
staff and mayor to secure approvals
Control Agency, Metropolitan Waste Control Commission and the
Minnesota Department of Health.
SWT/bc
Attachments
RESOLUTION NO. 1766
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION ORDERING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
TO BE PREPARED FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
NO. 84-5 FOR PROPERTY KNOWN AS GALE/YOST ADDITION
WHEREAS, the City of Mounds View has received a 100%
petition for improvements for property known as the Gale/Yost
Addition; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of Mounds View finds the
petition to be adequate and has received a feasibility report;
and
WHEREAS, the City Council has set, provided notice and
conducted a public hearing for the proposed public improvements;
and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Mounds View now orders plans and specifications to be
prepared for Public Improvement Project No. 84-5 for improvements
of street, sewer, water, storm sewer, curb and gutter, and street
lighting for the plat known as the Gale/Yost Addition; I
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that staff will prepare the plans
and specifications for the above project unless time does not
allow in which case the City Council authorizes staff to hire
Short -Elliott -Hendrickson, Inc. to prepare them;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that if staff prepares the plans
and specifications, prior to preparing them the property owner
shall deposit sufficient funds with the City to cover said
expenses;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City
of Mounds View will require the petitioners to submit a security
approved by the City in an amount equal to three (3) years
payment of assessments on the entire project prior to ordering
and awarding the project for construction.
ATTEST:
(SEAL)
Adopted this 9th day of July, 1984.
It
CccL>c GU
M yoR
1W
C1eCkrAdmini.trato
MEMO To: Clerk -Administrator and City CnuneiI
FROM: Director of. Public Works/Commnnity Development`
"I
DATE: April 15, 1985
SUBJECT: M.S.A. PROJECT 1985
As you may know, bids were opened on the subject. project on April
12, 1985. Six contractors submitted bids.
Attached please find a copy of the bid abstract of the 3 low
bidders. The totaL bid.fnr the 3 low bidders are as follows:
H & S Asphalt Company 5362,232.00
Bituminous Roadways $372,659.00
Alexander Construction 5378,133.75
H & S Asphalt Company's bid is not out of. line. They are a very
reputable company.
Attached also find a cost estimate for the subject project dated
April 15, 1985. The cost estimate takes H & S Asphalt Company's
bid and divides it into 2 catagories. The catagory labeled State
Aid Project (S.A.P.) 146-229-04 is the Municipal State Aid Project
on ouincy Street. The catagory labeled non -participating is the
City's 1985 Street Maintenance Project. H & S Asphalt Company will
construct both projects under one contract,
The estimated total cost of the Quincy Street Project is
$304,0O0.00. The budget for this project is S338,000.00.
The estimated construction cost of the City's 1985 Street
Maintenance Project is 5124,901.50. The budget for this project is
S131,500.00.
Also attached please find the abstract of the 3 low bidders for
last year's project (City Project 84-3).
RECOMMENDATION: I recommend awarding the contract to H & S Asphalt
Company amount of $362,232.00. I nave received approval
from the State of Minnesota and from the Rice Creek Watershed
District.
SWT/bc
Attachments
M.S.A. STREET PROJECT 1985
PAGE TWO OF THREE
H A S ASPHALT CO. BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS ALEXANDER CONST
ITEM
NO. DESCRIPTION
UNIT
q2ANTjTy
UNIT
FwCE
TOTAL
UNIT
PRICE
TOTAL
UNIT
PRICE
TOTAL
16. 2503.541 121, RC PIPE SEWER
-_
CLASS V
L.F.
160
22.00
3,520.00
20.00
3,200.00
21.10
3,376.00
17. 2503.541 18" RC PIPE SEWER
CLASS V
L.F.
60
25.00
1,500.00
23.50
1,410.00
24.80
1,488.00
18. 2503.541 21" RC PIPE SEWER
CLASS V
L.F.
280
30.00
8,400.00
27.50
7,700.00
29.00
8,120.00
19. 2503.541 30" RC PIPE SEWER
CLASS V
L.F.
180
55,00
9,900.00
50.00
9,000.00
52.75
9,495.00
20. 2503.541 421, RC PIPE SEWER
CUSS V
L.F.
12
90.00
1,080.00
87.00
1,044.00
91.80
1,101.60
21. 2506.509 CONSTRUCT CATCH
BASINS, DESIGN X
EACH
3
660.00
1,980.00
650.00
1,950.00
685.75
2,057.25
22. 2506.509 CONSTRUCT CATCH
BASINS, DESIGN Y
EACH
2
750.00
1,500.00
700.00
1,400.00
738.50
1,477.00
23. 2506,5U9 CONSTRUCT CATCH
BASINS, DESIGN Z
EACH
2
2,300.00
4,600,00
2,100.00
4,200.00
2,215.50
4,431.00
Z4. 0506.602 RELOCATE CATCH
EACH
2
750.00
I, 500.00
700,OU
1,400.00
738.50
1,477.00
BASIN
25. 2506.516 CASTING ASSEMBLIES
EACH
10
160.00
1,800.00
130.00
1,300.00
179.35
1,793.50
26. 2506.522 ADJUST FRAME AND
RING CASTING
EACH
23
85.00
1,955.00
100.00
2,300.00
110.00
2,530.00
27. 0504.602 ADJUST WATER
VALVE BOX
EACH
12
60.00
720.00
70.00
840.00
80.00
960.00
28. 2521.501 4" CONCRETE WALK
S.F.
14,800
1.25
18,500.00
1.15
17,020.00
1.15
17,020.00
29. 2521.501 6" CONCRETE WALK
S.F.
4,430
1.65
7,309.50
1.50
6,645.00
1,50
6,645.00
30. 2531.501 CONCRETE CURB AND
GUTTER DESIGN
B-618
L.F.
6,200
4.50 27,900.00
4.30 26,660.00
4.30 26,660.00
31. 2531.501 CONCRETE CROSS CURB
AND GUTTER
L.F.
160
7.80
1,248.00
7.50
1,200.00
7.50
1,200.00
32. 2535.501 BITLMINOUS CURB
L.F.
200
3.00
600.00
3.50
700.00
3,00
600,00
PAGE SUBTOTAL
94,012.50
67,969.00
90,431.35
M.S.A. STREET
PROJECT 1985
PAGE
THREE OF
THREE
H 6 S ASPHALT CO.
--
BITUMINOUS
ROADWAY
�_-�_--
UNIT
UNIT
ITEM
Np, DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANTITY
PRICE
TOTAL
PRICE
_ TOTAL
33.
2575.505
SOD
SQ.YD.
5,900
1.10
6,490.00
1.15
6,785.
54.
2105.525
BLACK DIRT FROM
490
6.00
2,940.00
6.60
5,234.
OFF SITE
C.YO.
U
35.
2501.511
2411 C.M. PIPE
L,F.
30
40.00
1,200,00
23.00
690,
36.
2506.509
STORM SEWER CONTROL
1
1,000.00
I,000.00
950.00
950,
STRUCTURE
EACH
37.
2101.502
CLEARING 61, DIA.
TO 101, DIA. TREES
EACH
12
90.00
1,080.00
25.00
300.
38.
2101.507
GRUBBING 61, DIA.
12
50.00
600.00
25.00
300.
TO to" DIA, TREES
EACH
39.
2356.505
BITUMINOUS MATERIAL
32,487.00
.88
31,416.
FOR SEAL COAT
GAL.
35,700
.91
40.
2356.507
SEAL COAT AGGREGATE
TON
1,900
14.91
28,329.00
14.75
28,025,
(FA-2)
41.
2341.518
EXCAVATE AND F.
AND 1. 3" THICK
PATCHING
SQ.YD.
3,DU0
6.50
19,500.00
5.80
17,400.
42.
2503.541
151, R.C. PIPE
10
25.00
250.00
22.00
220,
SEWER, CLASS V
L.F.
TOTAL alD M.S.A. STREET PROJECT 1985 362,232.00 372,659.00
UNIT
1.22 7,198.
6.86 3,361.
24.27 728.
1,022.25 1,022.
25.00 300.
25.00 300.
.96 34,272.
15.73 29,887.
I
7.25 21,750.00
23.21 232.10
378,133.
m
ITEM
N0,
DESCRIPTION UNI
1.
2021.501 MOBILIZATION LUMP
2.
2105.501 COMMON EXCAVATION C.
3.
2105.535 SALVAGED TOP SOIL
FROM STOCKPILE C.
4.
2111.501 TEST ROLLING R.
5.
2112.501 SUBGRADE
PREPARATION R.
6.
2211.501 AGGREGATE BASE
CLASS 5 TO
r 7,
2331.504 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL
1
FOR MIXTURE TO
0,
2331.514 BASE COURSE MIX, TO
9.
2341.504 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL
FOR MIXTURE 10
10.
2341.508 NEARING COURSE MIX, 10
II.
2357.502 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL
FOR TACK COAT GA
12.
2503.541 12" RC PIPE SEWER
CLASS V L.
13.
2503.541 15,, RC PIPE SEWER
CLASS V L.
14.
2503,541 24'1 RC PIPL SEWER
CLASS V L.
15.
25U1.515 INSTALL 12" RC
APRON N/TRASH
GUARD EA
16,
2506,509 CONSTRUCT CATCH
BASINS, DESIGN X EA
PALL SUIIUTAL
M.S.A. STREET PROJECT 1984
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW, MINNE50TA
CITY PROJECT 84-3
JUNE 4, 1984
ABSTRACT FOR THREE LOW UIU01HS
1
9,700
510
54.1
54.1
1,400
437
7,710
19U
2,410
2,773
110
45
65
3
11,000.00
11,000.00
29,925.00
29,925.
1.75
16,975.00
4.45
43,165.
4.50
2,295.00
3,00
1,530.
20.00
11082,OU
10.00
541.
85.00
4,598.50
97.50
5,274.
5.45
7,630.00
4.75
6,650.
198,00
86,526.00
0.01
4.
10.25
79,027.50
19.60
151,116.
198.00
37,620.00
0.01
I,
m_5nl 25.305.001 23.751 57,237.
2,911.65 1
4,950.00 44
2,160.00 46
3,9U0.00 59
300.001 285
1,650.00
201, 9 so.0
1,650.00
311,602.02
UNIT .
PRICE TOTAL
6,000.00 6,000.00
3.00 29,100.00
3.40 1,734.00
10.00 541.00
95.00 5,139.50
6.35 8,890.00
205.00 89,585.00
10.60 81,726.00
205.00 38,950.00
11.30 27,233.00
1.25 3,466.25
47.40 5,214.00
49.20 2,214.00
D2.75 4,078.75
305.00
1,770.00
305,945.50
M p,A, p,ticcl rnudcW 17" HMORIVES INC.
PAGE 1W0 OF THREE H b 5 ASPHALT CO3_- BITUMINOUS ROADNAYS
UNIT
UNIT UNIT
ITEM UNIT QUANTITY PNICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL
--_ _ DESCRIPTION 730.00 3 d
I1, 2506,509 CONSTRUCT CATCH 5 100,W 3,500,W 685.00 3,125,W
BASINS, DESIGN Y EACH
Itl, 0506.602 RELOCATE CATCH LALH I 565,W 565,0(D 555.00 555,00
600.00 600.00
BASIN 175,00 2,975,00 185.W 3,145.00
19, 2506,516 CASTING ASSEMBLIES EACH 17 I85,00 3,145.00
20, 2506.522 ADJUST FRAME AND LACH 19 15,00 1,425.00 12U,00 2,280.00 125.00 2,375,W
RING CASTING
21, 0504,602 ADJUST WATER EACH 16 40.OU 640,0085.00 I,SoO.W
100.00 1,6W,00
VALVE BOX
22. �511.505 HAND -PLACED RIPRAP 5 55,00 275,W 59.00
CLASS A C.Y. 250,00
S5,W 275.00
} 55.00 105,00 50.00
90.W 33.00 99,00
23. 2511.511 GRANULAR FILTER C.Y.
74, 210/,503 REMOVE EXISTING 4" 3,000 0,30 900,W 0,30 900.00
0.25 750.00
OR 61 CONCRETE WALK S.F. 23,152.50
11,150 1,25 21,437,50
1.24 21,266.W 1.35
25. 2521.501 41' CONCRETE WALK S.F. I,80 13,950.W 1.90 14,725.00
7 750 1.50 11,625.0U
26. 2521, 501 61- CONCRETE WALK S.F. �
27, 2104,501 REMOVE EXISTING 650 2.00 1,3W,U0
2.00 1,300.W I•W
CURB AND GUTTER L.F.
28. 2531.501 CONCRETE CURB AND 4.50 35,775,W
GUTTER DESIGN 4.85 38,557.50 4.2C 33,390.00
8-618
L.F. 7,950
py, 2551.501 CONCRETE CROSS CURB L.F. 160 1.00 1, 120.00
9.00 1,440.00 9.60 1,536.00
AND GUTTER
400 11.00 4,400.00
11,90 1,760.W 12,15 5,100.00
30, 2531,501 CONCRETE MEDIAN L.F. 2 yp 1,125.00
}1. 2535.501 01TlM INWS CURB L.F.
450 1.95 877.50 3.50 1,575.00
11O.GO 506.00 95.OU
437.00 100.00 460.00
4.6
}Y, 2575.501 IiUAD510E SEEDING ACRE 560,W 1,70 595.00
lll, 550
I.20 420.00 1.60
SS. 2515.502 SEED, MIXTURE 5
34. 2575.511 MULCH MATERIAL, I:0.00 1,200.W
130.00 1,300.00
[ON 10 125,00 1,25U.W
TYPE I 1,00 11,950.00 1.05 12,547.50 1.12 13,SU4.00
5% '2515.505 500 +O,YU 11,950
,
36. 210! BLACK DIRT FROM 6.00 6,120.00 6.00
6,120.W 6.40 6,528,00
OFF SITE 1•UI,Yp 1,020
110,118.50
110,380,50 117, 50
PAGE SUBTOTAL
M.S.A. STREET PROJECT 1984
PAGE THREE OF THREE
H A S ASPHALT CO. BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS_ _ HARCRIVES, INC.
ITEM
NO. DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANTITY
UNIT
PRICE TOTAL
UNIT
PRICE TOTAL
UNIT
PRICE TOTAL
37. 0565.604 REVISED FULL TRAFFIC
ACTUATED TRAFFIC
SIGNAL SYTEM L.S.
1
13,900.00
13,900.00
13,640.00
13,640.00
15,595.00
15,595.00
38. 2501.511 12" C.M. PIPE L.F.
80
10.00
800.00
9.50
760.00
10.15
012.00
39. 2501,515 U.S. APRON EACH
2
80.00
160.00
75.00
150.00
80.00
160.00
4n, 2501.511 2411 C.M. PIPE L.F.
10
35.00
550.00
34.35
343.50
36.75
367.50
41. 2501.515 241- G.S. APRON EACH
2
120.00
240.00
115.00
230.00
123.00
246.00
42. 2531.501 CONCRETE CLAB
AND GUTTER
DESIGN B-624 L.F.
3,300
6.00
19,800.00
4.95
16,335.00
5.30
17,490.00
PAGE SUITOTAL 35,250.00 31,458.50 34,670.50
TOTAL BID 433,299.15 453,441.02 457,766.50
COST ESTIMATE
M.S.A, STREET PROJECT 1985
CITY OF MOUNDS VIER, MINNESOTA
CITY PROJECT 85-1
APRIL 15, 1985 H A S ASPHALT CO.
_ ..................................................
._ .- ------- SAP 146-229-04 NGNd'ARTIC I PATING TOTAL
UNIT ....__--------.
NO. __ - DESCRIPTION _--_ --LY UNIT Y _- PRICE _ OUANTITYI -_ TOTAL QUANTITYI TOTAL QUANTITY TOTAL
I, 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LUMP SUM 10,000.00 0.6 t6,000.00 0.45 4,000.00 1 10,000.00
2, 2104.501 REMOVE EXISTING
15" RCP STORM
SEVER L.F. f _ 7.50 570 S 4.275.00 0 f 0_00 570 S 4,275.03
3. 2104.501 REMOVE EXISTING
1811 RCP STORM
SEWER L.F. $__ 7,50 50 $ 375.00 0 f 0_00 50 S 375.00
4. 2104.501 REMOVE EXISTING
24" RCP STORM
SEWER L.F. S,^ 8.00 100 $ 800.00 0 S 0_00 100 S 800.00
5, 2104.509 REMOVE EXISTING
42" APRON EACH f_ 100.00 1 f 100.00 0 f 0.00 1 S 100.00
6. 2105.501 COMMON EXCAVATION C.Y. f __ 1_90 5,200 £ 9,880.00 300 f 570.00 5,500 10,450.00
7, 2105.535 SALVAGED TOP SOIL
FROM STOCKPILE C.Y. f _4_50 250 S 1,125.00 0 S 0_00 250 S
8, 2111.501 TEST ROLLING R.S. S 10,00 26.5f 265.00 0 S 0_00 26.5 $ 265.00
9, 2112.501 SUBGRADE
PREPARATION R.S. S. 80.00 26.5f 2,120.00 0 f 0_00 26.5 S 2,120.00
10. 2211.501 AGGREGATE BASE
CLASS 5 TON f__ 5.50 400 S 2,200.00 300 $ 1,650.00 700 S 3,850.00
11, 2351.504 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL
FOR MIXTURE TON f_ 205,00 175 E 35,875.00 0 $ 0_00 175 35,875.00
12. 2i31.514 BASE COURSE MIX, TON S - 10y35 3,850 S 39,847.50 0 f 0_00 3,650 39,847.50
13. 2341.504 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL
FOR MIXTURE TON f 205.00 80 S 16,400.00 78 $15.990.00 158 32,390.00
14. 2341.508 WEARING COURSE MIX, TON $ 11.75 1,300 S 15,275.00 1,300 $15,215.00 2,600 30,550.00
15. 2357.502 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL
FOR TACK COAT GAL. $ 1.10 1,500 S 1,650.00 610 S 671.00 2,110 S 2,321.00
16. 2503.541 12" RC PIPE SEWER
CLASS V L.F. f 22.00 160 f 3,520.00 0 S 0_00 160 S 3,520,00
Y
17. 2503.541 18" RC PIPE SEWER
CLASS V L.F. S _- �5.00 60 S 1,500.00 0 f 0.00 60 S 1,50
PACE SUBTOTAL f111t201.50 S 381156.00 179,363.51
COST ESTIMATE FOR M.S.A. PROJECT 1985
CITY PROJECT 85-1
PAGE TWO OF THREE ______ ___________.._____...__..._.
rN SAP 146-229-04 N011-PARTICIPAT ING TOTAL
UNIT
TEMII
LD.L DESCRIPTION __UNIT . PRICE QUANTITY TOTAL OUAIITI TY� TOTAL OUANTITYI TOTAL
18. 2505.541 21" RC PIPE SEWER
f 30 00 280 S 8,400.00 0 S 0_00 280 f 8,/00_00
CLASS V
L.F.
_--
19.
2503.541
3011 RC PIPE SEWER
CLASS V
L.F.
S,__
55,00
180
S , 9,900,00
0
S
0_00
I80
f 9.900.00
20.
2505.541
42" RC PIPE SEWER
CLASS V
L.F.
S _
90.00
12
S 1,080,00
0
S
0y00
12
f I,080.00_
21.
2506.509
CONSTRUCT CATCH
BASINS, DESIGN K
EACH
S
660.00
3
f 1,980,00_
O
f
0_00
3
f 1,980.00
22.
2506.509
CONSTRUCT CATCH
BASINS, DESIGN Y
EACH
f
750.00
2
S I,500.00
O
f
0_00
2
f 1.500.00
23.
2506.509
CONSTRUCT CATCH
BASINS, DESIGN 2
EACH
S 2,300.00
2
f 4,600,00
O
S
0_00
2
f 4.600.0
24.
0506.602
RELOCATE CATCH
EACH
f
750.00
2
S _ 1,500.00
0
f
0_00
2
f 1,500.00
BASIN
/ 5.
2506.516
CASTING ASSEMBLIES
EACH
S
180.00
10
S 1,800.00
0
f
0y00
10
f 1,800.00
26.
2506.522
ADJUST FRAME AND
RING CASTING
EACH
J
85_00
8
S ti80.00
15
3 1,275.00
23
S 1.955.00
27.
0504.602
ADJUST WATER
VALVE BOX
EACH
f
60_y00
4
S 240.00
8
f
480,00
12
f 720.00
28.
2521.501
4" CONCRETE WALK
S.F.
S�
1__25
13,300
f 16,625.00_
1,500
f 1,815.00
14,800
f I8,500.00
29.
2521.501
6" CONCRETE WALK
S.F.
f
�.65
4,400
S !,MgO
30
f
49.50
4,430
f -b509,50
30,
2531,501
CONCRETE CURB AND
L.F.
f
4.50
5,900
f 26 550.00
-�--
300
S 1,350.00
6,200
S 27,900.00
GUTTER DESIGN
31.
2531.501
CONCRETE CROSS CURB
AND GUTTER
L.F,
S
_ 7_80
160
S 1,248.00
0
f
Oy00
160
f �248.
32.
33.
2535.81TUMINOUS CURB
2575.505 SOD
L.F.
SO,YD,
f.
f-__
3.00
!.10
2DO
5,900
3 600,00
f 6,490.00
0
0
f
S
0_00
0_-00
200
5,900
f 600.00
f 6.490.00
54,
2105.525
BLACK DIRT FROM
OFF SITE
CU.YD.
,f 6_00
490
S 2j940.00
0
f
0,_00
490
S 2,940�,
15.
2501.511
24° C.M. PIPE.
L.F,
S
- 40.00
30
f 1,200,00.
O
f
0,_0000
30
f 11200.00
S 94,90 $ 5,029.50 f 99.622.50
PAGE SUBTOTAL 93,0
COST ESTIMATE FOR M.S.A. PROJECT 1985
CITY PROJECT 85-1
PAGE. THREE OF THREE
................
ITEM
. -- DESCRIPTI
36. 2506.509 STORM SEWER CONTROL
STRUCTURE EACH S. 1,000.00
37. 2101.502 CLEARING 6" DIA.
TO 10" DIA. TREES EACH S. 90.00
38. 2101.507 GRUBBING 6" DIA,
TO 10° DIA, TREES EACH f - 50.00
39. 2356.505 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL
FOR SEAL COAT GAL. f`91
40. 2356.507 SEAL COAT AGGREGATE
(FA-2) TON f_ 14.91
41. 2341.516 EXCAVATE F. AND I.
3" THICK PATCHING SQ.YD. f 6.50
42. 2503.541 15" R.C. PIPE SEWER
CLASS V L.F. 3 _ 25.00
PAGE SUBTOTAL
ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST
-..... - ..... .......................
-._._.__„....................... SAP 146-229-04 NON -PARTICIPATING TOTAL
UNIT---
ITY - TUTAL QUANTtiY TOTAL'-
QUANTITY TOTAL
------ -- -- L-
1 $ 1,000.00 0 S 0_00 1 S I,000.00
2 S 180.00 10 f _900.00 12 S 1,G80.00
2 $ _100.00 10 S 500.00 12 S 600.00
0 $ 0.00 35,700 f 32.487.00 35,700 S 32,487.00
0 S . 0_00 1,900 S 28,329.00 1,900 $ 28,329.00
0 S 0_00 3,000 $19,500.00 3,000 S 19,500,00
10 f 250.00 0 $ 0_00 10 f 250.00
S 1,530.00 S 81,716.00 S 83,24
5237,330.50
COST ESTIMATE BY CITY OF MDUNDS VIEW
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST SAP 146-229-04
ESTIMATED PRELIMINARY ENGINEER1140
ESTIMATED INSPECTION AND STAKING
CONTINGENCY
ESTIMATED TOTAL COST SAP 146-229-04
USE
$124,901.50
$237,330.50
S 23,700.00
S 18,900.00
S 23.700.00
5303,630.50
$304,000.00
f362,232.00
Eli
i4h111)'11): Mounds View Pity C( unc ^
FROM: Hrucw K. Anderson, a or
Parks, Recreation Fo st
iwn.: April 18, 1989
RF: (;reunfield Park Hid Opening
Staff held a hid opening on Wednesday morning, April 17, 1985 for Phase I con -
The bid opening included the following develop-
structi n of Greenfield Park.
n)nt projects:
1. Approximately 4,230 linear feet of bituminous and Limestone trail con-
struction.
2. Relocation of the existing baseball field including fencing and backstop.
3, Bituminous entrance road and parking lot.
4. Twin tennis courts.
5. Storm sewer extension.
6. Culvert installation.
7. Tennis court lighting.
There were fifteen sets of plans that were picked up by major contractors and
sub -contractors during the past three weeks. At the formal hid opening, four
firms submitted bid proposals. Each of the four firms that submitted bid pro-
posals acknowledged the bid addendum and included a bid bond as outlined in
the original bid specifications. The bid proposals ranged from a low of
5123,500 to a high of $196,232.25.
The low hid was suhnitted by Midwest Asphalt Company which is projects. sIn
that submitted the low bid for the 14SA street construction profnd
addi-
tion to the low bid price, staff has reviewed the scheduledbin unit price
compared them to the other three bid firms. They are comparable
costs, with no one major unit cost priced at an exorbitant rate to cause con-
cern. As a matter of fact, the bid price of $1.25 for the polypropylene con-
struction fabric per square yard was the lowest Of the four firms and will
probably be one of the major items that staff will be recommending as a poss-
ible contract amen(tent.
Total budget for the Greenfield Park Project is 5180,000 of which we have
allocated approximately 918,500 to the firm of Barton
--rAosctm �e1tiS40le )OOU below
consulting fees. This places the low bid estimate app Y
total project cost.
Staff would recameend that the low hid of $123,500 to awarded to Midwest
Asphalt Co. and we will be reviewing potential alternatives as to what addi-
tional projects might be included to Complete Phase I. Staff has been in con-
tact with State L.A.w.C.O.N. officials and they have indicated strong support
to an addendum to the contract to ensure that the dollars are utilized for
projects at Grcenfield Park. staff feels a favorable nid from Midwest Asphalt
can be directly tied in with the low bid that was received for the MSA street
project which will reduce the mobilization rusts as well as allow them to work
on both projects simultaneously.
REc(ODIDATION: To award the low hid of 5123,500 to 14idwest Asphalt Company
for Ph velopm nt of Greenfield Park.
HKA/gll
CITY OF MOUNDS
V11•ai
2.4111 Ili-lhw'ry
III
Mound, Vlr•w, MN
Y' [ 12
GREENFIEI.D PARK ISID
OPENING
April 17, I911'i
—
IiID BOND
LUMP SUM
pr
FIRM NAME
1
ENC'LOS1-11—
HID PRICK —
I.
Alhel' construction Co.
—
2.
F:arI F. Andervnu Co.
_-------
Co tiK
IS$ 3N3•
3,__
liarber Construction
--5, _. ---
4.
------'-- ---- aG
liltllillillcllls Roadway!;�
5
159) 3 13.0 0_
- - ----'-
_
5,
miry acid Carlson
h.
Central Lalld`sc"Pllll3
—
7.
F,lect,-il:al sorvicr Contract"'.
/ H.
Elk River Concreto
_
9.
Fene Co. , Lllc .
-
--
Ova3a.S
H 6 S AsphaIt Co. 1.
lll,
—
ll
liardrives, Inc.--
12.
MCGroom Cu116t1-Ilcl'.ion Co.
---
--N--
Cu.
0-
I�15o0.0
li.
Midwest Asphalt
14.
Sjostrom, Inc.
—_----
1 y,
-Pwin ('ity FunCe:
—
Ih.
--
17.
—
ADDENDUM NO.1
TO
CONTRACT DOCUMENTS FOR
GREENFIELD PARK IMPROVEMENTS
MOUNDS VIEW, MINNESOTA
NOTICE: Bidders are required to acknowledge receipt of this addendum on the
bid form in the space provided, or by separate letter or telegram prior to the
opening of bids. Failure to acknowledge all addendums may cause rejection
of the bid.
The Invitation for bids for the subject project is hereby amended as follows:
1. Changes to SPecificatians
1.1. Page 7, of the Contract Proposal, delete the following unit price items:
ITEM UNIT UNIT PRICE
271, CMP Culvert L.F. $
27" CMP Apron Ea. E
1.2. Insert an page 71 the following unit price items:
ITEM UNIT UNIT PRICE
24" CMP Culvert L.F. S
24" CM Apron Ea. S
A revised Contract Proposal is attached hereto.
2. Changesio Contract Drewin s
2.1. Drawing No. 5. Change culvert crossing design to conform with the
attached sheet 5A.
2.2. Drawing No. 6, Delete 12" CMP culvert as shown on the attached sheet
6A.
ts of
All
2.3. Orype B Ihiking7and 8. Change trai e o conform with the catt chedtion ioheets 7A end 8A.and
AddePage 1 of 1
collusion to secure bidding,
6r himselftanyeg
refrain from advantage over any other binehas not In dmanner Bought by
bidder.
The onlysal I
other
the
ne whose
Ign ersons interested as
d hereto are do be listncials ledtasefoll was (if there are none, a nonestate the
fact):
Name Address
Name Address
Name Address
The undersigned bidder submits herewith Proposal Guarantee in the form of a bid
's check
of
bond,
tcertified
unt of not lessrthen fiveipercent of the bidn favor of the yand agreessand consentsVlewt s
nhe amount that
the Proposal Guarantee shall be forfeited to the City of Mounds View, Minnesota as
liquidated damages If the required contract bond are not executed within ten (10)
days from the Notice of Award.
In submitting this bid, it le understood that the right Is reserved by the City to
reject any or all bids, and to waive irregularities in bidding. It is also agreed that
this bid may not be withdrawn for a period of thirty (30) days from the opening
thereof.
,(corporation incorporated
Being a (under the laws of the
(State of (YM " n ( s- 40.
(Partnership
a
Blame .,ems.
Name of (-antreclor
33 $
Address Street or P.O. Box
Cit State —Zip
93y-'77o0
elephone Number
Respectfully submitted,
i%%id ue rY' S/J�n /
Cont*Signature
tr Bidder
By
composed of officers, partners
or owners, as follows:
President �� -
�G(/.�//�� �i�LGr/I�!
Vice President
(S�`v+ ti
Secretary
reasurer
10
CONTRACT PROPOSAL
O MPROIVEMENTSELD K
MOUNDS VIEW, MINNESOTA
Date
s
h4 0a �� (hereinafter
Proposal of ting under the laws of the State
called "Bidder") a corporation rganized �a P:artnership, or an Individual doing
of 4Y 2 f c.
business ae
To: Mr. Bruce K. Andorson, Director
f Perks, Recreation and Forestry
Department o
City of Mounds View
2401 Highway 10
Mounds View, Minnesota 55112
DEAR SIRS
The Bidder, having examined the plane end specifications w with reof the lated documenns
ts
s
work, end being familiar with all the availability of
and the site of the ,reposed osed project Including
surrounding the construction of the prop end supplies, and to construct
labor, hereby proposes to furnish all labor, materiels, sum amount shell
the project in accordance ime set forth
em amount statedlet h the Contr(Dher'ein. qufrledmundertthe Contract
therein, end for the jump
cover all Documents, xpenseof which hisrProposel is a pered in t the
,BASE
The Bidder agrees to complete , �
all work defined by the Contract Documents fort the
JUMP sum of .. 4 ! LL,/) 2J,&,�A—
..p 'r,the amount
Amount is shown in both words and
figures. In case of discrepancy,
shown in words �q
Schedules Prlcee
unit prices will thelifeothenly for
his
The Bidder further agrees that the following the termination of this
additions to, deletions from or extra work authorized during
contract and for a period of thirty (30) days following
contract for any reason, all supervision, labor, tools,
ment, fringes, taxes, insurancinclude complete installation, e, profit, etc.,
Unit prices shell
materials, supplies, accessories, e1cui P
in accordance with all contract Specifications• UNiT UNITE
ITEM
C.Y.
Common Excavation (2105)
C.Y.i0
Rock Excavation (2105)
C.Y.
Granular Borrow (LV)
$ S,op
C.Y.
Common Borrow (LV)
L_S�11
C.Y.
Topsoil Borrow (LV)
C.Y.
5— sue'
Salvaged Aggregate
L.F.
Erosion Control
s G�
Fine grading, fertilizing
S.Y.
and sodding
f��
Fine grading, tertlllzing
S.Y.
and sodding
b'x6"xloll precast concrete
Ea.��
curb w/anchore
L.F.
5
15" RCP sewer, Class 5
S l
Ea.
15" RC apron
L.F.
�°—'
121, rMP culvert
12" CM apron
L.F.
24" CMP culvert
s a
Ea.
24" CM apron
S.Y.
$ o
4" Ag-lime trail (Including grading)
S.Y.
b" cg-lime trot!
S.Y.
5�-
4„ ag.Iima surlece (baseball field)
7
ITEM
UNIT
UNIT PRICE
6' high chain link fence (baseball)
L.F.
, o0
10' high chain line fence (tennis)
L.F.
i ' NO
6" Class 5 aggregate base
S.Y.
$ ai•
4" Class 5 aggregate base
S.Y.
1.1/2" plant mixed bituminous
Sly.
$ o?. 3 ;z
base course (2331)
V plant -mixed bituminous
wearing course (2341)
S.Y.
2" plant -mixed bituminous
wearing course (2341)
Sly.
$ 3. p
Polypropylene Construction fabric
S.Y.
$ X-
Basketball standard, backboard and goal
Ea.
S wl ao
Tennis bangboerd
L.S.
ya�c •oiJ
Tennis Court Lighting System
L.S.
$ 00
I
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF ADDENDA
Th undersigned Contrac or hereby acknowledges receipt of Addendum No.
thru Addendum
�JJ/p�/AIPft /�Cilf74/� CU_r_�.
O8t8
ontrector
T� undersigned Contractor hereby acknowledges receipt, of Addendum No.
_� thru Addendum No.
Contractor
Date
The following surety company has indicated its willingness to bond our firm for the
work herein described
�C-
a f Surety
!te Attornay-in•fect,
If rees
o execute said
contractad the end furnleshtthetrequireddPerformance and ned bidder hPaybmeniBond tand procure the
required Insurance within ten (10) consecutive calendar days from the date of the
Notice of Award of said contract.
The undersigned bidder further proposes that should this Pr�posel be accepted, he
will commence work within ten (10) consecutive calendar days from and Including
the date of endto ates Proceed led I
ndhe will complete
o a plete it the
work covered by the
Contract Documents by
act
rded the C1
iThe ncludedthe work
eingth a Proposal, der further
b gin Band to if ace complete andtrde Iverr the work
contemplated In accordance with the conditions set forth In the Contract
Documents.
The undersigned bidder has checked carefully the foregoing lump Bum amount
err omissibons an, and the part Ofstheds that the undersigned In preparing will
preparl g this Prfor any error
opreel.
The undersigned hereby certifies that this Proposal isgenuine,
in , and not sham
nd
collusive, or made in the Interest or behalf a any p
that the undersigned has not, directly or indirectly, Induced or solicited any other
bidder to put In a sham bid, or Induced any other person, firm or corporation to
4i*t, /'�7
TO: Mayor, City Council and Clerk -Administrator
FROM: Police Civil Service Commission
DATE: April 18, 1985
RE: HIRING, OF ADDITIONAL POLICE OFFICERS
In January of this year the Mounds View Civil Service Commission began
the process of selecting qualified applicants for the nosition of Police
Officer. The selection process included a written examination, oral
examination, psycholonical testinq, physical examination and a comprehensive
personnal history and background investigation. The Commission was advised
by Chief Ramacher that the 1985 budget allows for hiring an additional
Police Officer after April 1, 1985. Chief Ramacher also advised the
Commission of the retirement of Sgt. Haqen effective April 30, 1985.
The Commission hereby submits the following three names of qualified
applicants for City Council consideration.
Robert Nelson
Margaret Wolverton
David Anderson
RECOMMENDATION: The hounds View Civil Service Commission requests that
City Council authorize the hiring of Robert Nelson to the
position of Police Officer startinq on or about May 1, 1985.
Also that the City Council authorize the hiring of Margaret
Wolverton to the position of Police Officer starting on
or about May 3, 1985.
Probationary period will be a six month duration. Starting
salary and benefits will be per local union agreement.
-1
MEMO TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUN'
FROM: CLERK-ADMINISTRATO
DATE: APRIL A, 1985
SUBJECT: MAC RESPONSE TO COMMENTS ON ,SLOPING DOCUMENT
I have reviewed the document provided by MAC entitled, "Anoka
County -Blaine Airport (Janes Field) Response to Comments from
Public Meeting and Letters on Environmental Assessment Work -
sheet and Draft Scoping Decision" and have come to the general
conclusion that they are indicating that they will address the
great majority of comments submitted to them in response to the
Environmental Assessment Worksheet Scoping Document as part of
the Environmental Impact Statement. Whether or not they are
simply paying "lip service" to these comments or sincerely
intend to evaluate the issues in detail while performing the
EIS can only be determined once the EIS is completed. The
major issues raised by the City of Mounds View and/or residents
of the City which are of particular comment and which will be
addressed in the EIS are the following:
The environmental impacts of the ILS, Control
Tower, in Phases 2 and 3 development will be
addressed in an informational appendix to be
included in the Environmental Impact State-
ment.
2. The EIS will include a review of current
conditions as they may relate to need and
justification for the project rather than
simply taking the Airport Master Plan at face
value.
3. The EIS will include a determination of what
existing noise levels are with and without
traffic for both on -site and off -site locations
at distances between runways and closest resi-
dential areas.
4. Noise monitoring and field observation of
aircraft patterns actually flown at the airport
will be conducted during the EIS.
5. The EIS will include an analysis of the following
development options:
a) Removing the airport and/or replacing it
with another airport.
b) The efficacy of lengthening the east/west
runway to reduce the amount of traffic
using the north/south runway.
MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
APRIL 4, 1995
PACE TWO
c) A discussion of the extent to which
construction of Phases lA and 1B could
affect the probability of Phases 2 and
3.
d) A review of options for shifting the
north/south runway to the north including
the northerly shift of as much as 2700 ft.
6. Peak hour conditions and auto routes traveled will
be assessed in the EIS.
7. Compliance with the City's Comprehensive Plan will be
addressed in the EIS process.
8. Wildlife biologists and Minnesota Department of
Natural Resources Staff will investigate whether
egrets are nesting on the airport property or in
any suitable and adjacent habitat during the
Spring of 1985.
9. A species list for the area will be prepared and
the potential impacts to animal species on the
list will be assessed in the EIS process.
10. Aircraft noise modeling in the EIS process will
reflect variations in both flight tracks and
approach and departure profiles actually observed
at the airport.
11. The Ldn noise metric as well as the state noise
metric standard in place at the time noise analysis
is prepared will be used in the EIS document.
12. In response to a comment from Thomas Balcom, Environ-
mental Review Coordinator for the Minnesota Department
of Natural Resources, which stated that, "Contrary to
the Scoping EAW, loss of upland habitat must be studied
in the EIS as wildlife will not relocate, but rather
be diminished." The EIS will evaluate the possible
loss of upland habitat and plan to replace upland
habitat at the airport.
13. A general discussion of the benefit of the airport to
the community will be provided in the EIS document as
well as an evaluation of the impact project construction
and use will have on the human environment.
MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
APRIL 4, 1985
1 PAGE THREE
Rather than taking any further positions with respect to the
Environmental Impact Statement at this time it would be my
recommendation that the City take a wait -and -see attitude to
determine whether or not the Metropolitan Airports Commission
is sincere when it states that it will evaluate all of the issues.
Contacts have been made with representatives of the MPCA in an
attempt to follow the Environmental Impact Statement Project and
make some preliminary determination as to the efforts put forth
by MAC in setting the issues.
DFP/mjs
MEMO TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUN' L
FROM: CLERK-ADMINISTRATI
DATM; APRIL 10, 1985
SUBJECT: PUBLIC WORKS/PARKS MAINTENANCE REORGANIZATION
As you may know, the Parks Maintenance function of the
City's Public Works Department was separated from that
department and, along with two maintenance personnel,
assigned to the Parks, Recreation and Forestry Depart-
ment for a twelve month trial period. This reorganiza-
tion was undertaken for the following reasons:
1. As far back as memory and City records go,
the City's Parks Directors have voiced
dissatisfaction with the City's Parks
Maintenance function of not being under their
direct control as they did not feel Parks
Maintenance had an appropriately high enough
priority in relationship to other Public
Works activities. Also, the Parks Directors
objected to being responsible for budgeting
_ for Parks Maintenance and yet having no
control ovar the actual work.
Due to a certain amount of instability in the
leadership of the Public Works Department at
the time, it seemed appropriate to lessen the
negative impact resulting from that situation
by limiting the burden on the new leadership
thus allowing for a concentration of effort.
The !stipulated twelve-month trial period has expired and I
have reviewed the situation with both Parks and Recreation
Direotor Anderson and Public Works/Community Development
Dire,:tor Thatcher. It was their individual recommendation,
with which I concur, Parks Maintenance responsibilities be
retuned to the Public. Works Department, not as a result of
the failure of the current arrangement, but in the best
interest of the organization as a whole.
We reel that at this time the City's organizational
structure is such that we are more productive when combining
people in tasks than when individuals are too specialized in
their functions and that a continued decentralization of
Public Works and Parks Maintenance functions would be
detrimental to the efficient scheduling and use of man-
power and equipment.
Mayor and Council
April 10, LgH9
Page Two
stipuLations we would place on this recommendations are as
follows:
1.
An effective date of April 2q, 1985 or as soon
thereafter as possible.
2.
Plane the arrangement on a twelve-month trial
period with an evaluation at the end of that
period before a final derision is made.
3.
The day-to-day supervision of the personnel
regularly assigned to Parks Maintenance would
be the responsibiLity of the Public, Works Fore-
man who would work in close cooperation with the
Parks, Recreation and Forestry Director and Public
Works/Community Development Director, including
regular meetings as well as completing monthly work
task sheets provided by the Parks, Rerreation and
Forestry Director..
4.
The Parks, Recreation and Forestry Director would
have direct input through the Publir. Works/
Community Development Director on all personnel
issues relating to the Public Works Foreman
including evaluation, salary review, disciplinary
authority, and authority to provide work direction
on all park related issues.
5.
The Parks, Recreation and Forestry Director would be
solely rosponsihle for submitting recommendations to
the Parks and Recreation Commission and City Council
for capital improvements for City Parks.
6. The annual parks maintenance equipment capital
improvement proposals submitted as part of the
annual budget and long-term financial plan would be
prepared by the Parks, Recreation and Forestry
Director and reviewed and approved by the Publir.
Works Foreman and Public Works/Community Development
Director.
7. The responsibility for the hiring of all part-time
staff personnel assigned to Parks and the coordina-
tion of the JPTA/MEFD Grants would remain the
responsibility of the Parks, Recreation and Forestry
Director with day-to-day supervision being the
responsibiLity of the Pub1tC Works Foreman.
® Mayor and Council
April 101 1985
Page Three
Stafhis
th
yourf convenience, however, weis prepared to discuss twould emphasirecommendation l
zethatthis oa isa
unanimous recommendation being submitted to you in the best
interest of the City's organization as a whole.
DFP/mjs
1 1 1
PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA
Regular Meeting
March 25, 1985
Mounds View City Hall
2401 Hwy. 10, Mounds View, MN 55112
----------------------------------------------------------
Mayor Linke welcomed the cable television viewers 1. Welcome
and introduced the Council and Staff.
Mayor Linke called the meeting to order at 7:30 PM
on Monday, March 25, 1985.
The Pledge of Allegiance was said.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Councilmembers Hankner, Quick,
Blanchard and Mayor Links.
ALSO PRESENT: City Attorney Meyers, Clerk/
A inistrator Pauley and Public Works/Community
Development Director Thatcher.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley administered the oath of
office to newly elected Councilmember Haake.
Motion/Second: Quick/Blanchard to approve the March
11, 1985 minutes as presented.
4 ayes 0 nays 1 abstention
Councilmember Haake abstained from the vote as she
had not been on the Council at that time.
Motion/Second: Hankner/Quick to approve the minutes
o� th' h March 12, 1985 as presented.
4 ayes 0 nays 1 abstention
Councilmember Haake abstained from the vote as she
had not been on the Council at that time.
2. Call to Order
3. Pledge of
Allegiance
4. Roll Call
5. Oath of Office
6. Approval of
Minutes:
March 11, 1985
March 12, 19S5
Motion Carried
Motion Carried
Representative Gordy Voss updated the Council and 7. Residents
' audience on the status of local government aids, Requests and
the comparable worth study, the required vote on Comments from
comp plans and zoning ordinances, and the airport
issue.
Mounds View City Council March 25, 1985
Regular Meeting Page Two
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Mayor Linke closed the regular meeting and opened 8. Public Hear
the public hearing on the proposed Pleasant View Pleasant V r
Drive/Highway 10 signalization. Hwy. 10 Sig -
ization
Evan Greene of MnDOT reviewed the proposed signali-
zation of Highway 10 at Pleasant View Drive. He
reviewed the history of the request and ,the various
plans that have been proposed since 1977. He
explained they have not received the approval of
both Mounds View and Spring Lake Park on the same
plan and because of the safety improvement involved,
would request the approval at this time. The
project would be 90/o federally funded and 10% local,
with the cities buying the right of way.
Mayor Links recognized Mayor Don Masterson of Spring
Lake Park, and explained that Spring Lake Park is
willing to pay the cost of the land and installation,
and Mounds Views cost would be 50% of the monthly
operating fee, or $75.00.
Owen Egge, 8371 Pleasant View Drive, questioned why
the stoplight was proposed for Pleasant View Drive
rather than 83rd and Sunset. He stated they have a
high enough traffic level already and were concerned
that traffic would feed onto their street if the light
were put there, and Pleasant View is already a very
narrow, curving road not meant for that type of traffic.
He also stated it would reduce their property values
and asked who would pay for that.
Mr. Greene replied the signal could not be placed at
83rd and Sunset as it was too close to the Highway 65
interchange. He added that compensation would not be
given to the property owners for any change in the
value of their homes, but the City would be able to
establish traffic controls, such as allowing only
right turns in and out of Pleasant View.
Mr. Egge expressed concern over the children of the
area and possible injury to them with a higher
traffic count.
Gary Pali, 8422 Pleasant View Drive, stated he had
moved to his home seven years ago because it was a
quiet, pleasant residential area. He added that he
sees no value to the City of Mounds View by putting
the light at that location, but rather it benefits
Spring Lake Park only. He suggested looking at
alternative sites in Spring Lake Park or in conjuction
with the new Highway 10.
Mr. Egge explained the new Highway 10 is not the answer
to the safety problem, as demonstrated with the traffic
flow on Coon Rapids Boulevard. He added that a 1982
traffic count showed 299 vehicles per day traveled
.._.._.l- 174. .. rt r,. rAll" I March 25, 1985
.,V LL1.U. ........,_.., _..,...--- Page Three
Regula5 "eating
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Pleasant View Drive, He suggested closing off
Pleasant View so no one could get through at all.
Mayor Linke stated closing Pleasant View off would
present problems for both the Police and Fire
Departments, although something might be worked out
for emergencies.
Mr. Greene stated they had looked at other plans but
none were feasible, and if they were to place it in
Spring Lake Park, they would have to use commercial
property, which is much more expensive to purchase,
and they would have to displace buildings and
businesses.
Meg Davis, 8392 Pleasant View Drive stated she would
rather have the commercial businesses disturbed than
the residential area.
Councilmember Hankner asked if a knock -down gate could
be installed at the end of Pleasant View, if it were
closed off, to allow emergency access.
Police Chief Ramacher replied they have installed
them in other parts of the City but have never had the
occassion to use them. All the squad cars and fire
department vehicles have keys in them for the gates.
He also pointed out the other areas are lower in
traffic than Pleasant View Drive,
Mr. Greene stated they could get more restrictive on
Pleasant View by allowing right turns only in and out.
John Davis, 8392 Pleasant View Drive asked if a decision
had already been made, or whether the City could say no
at this point. He stated the residents have repeatedly
said they do not want the signalization at that location.
Mr. Greene pointed out the issue will riot go away and will
only get worse, and something must be done as far as safety
is concerned.
Merl Lensing, 8310 Pleasant View Drive, suggested
reconsidering Spring Lake Park Road, which had been
proposed five or six years ago.
Mr. Greene stated they cannot go back in time, and
they are looking for a design that will be safe and
help everyone and not affect the property values.
Dolly Bruner, 8454 Pleasant View Drive, stated she has
had cars end up in her yard twice that have been hit on
the highway, and she would like to see stop signs added.
Larry Klemms, of MnDOT, reminded the residents that it
would be very important to have a signal for the children
Mounds View City Council March 25, 1985
Regular Meeting Page Four
-----------------------------------------r..rr.wr.C�nr.r.r�.rnrn.nrr.�
and pedestrians to cross the highway for the
beach and recreational facilities on the other side.
Councilmember Hankner suggested some things that
could be done to help control the traffic at that
location, such as signage, not allowing traffic
from the frontage road onto Pleasant View, and so
forth.
Mayor Linke reminded the residents that the purpose
of the meeting in for the Council to get input from
them, and the Council has not yet made a decision.
Mrs. Davis stated she was sensing a trade-off, and
they were just moving the hazardous area, since it
would be beneficial to Spring L;3ke Park.
Councilmember Haake stated she was familiar with the
issue as she had been on the Planning Commission in
1977 when it was first discussed. She stated that
while she does not want to be an unfriendly neighbor
to Spring Lake Park, Pleasant View Drive is a very
nice road and she would like to study all the
alternatives before making any decision.
Mayor Linke reminded the residents that the CouDcil
would not be making a decision tonight but would be
sitting down later to discuss all aspects.
Don Masterson, Mayor of Spring Lake Park, stated
that the side effects are a very unfortunate situation
and he hopes Mounds View will look at the alternatives
to lower, the impact. He added the stoplight is
critical to the long term safety of the general area,
and while he agreed it is primarily a Spring Lake
Park problem, it does involve Mounds View also. He
added that the cost to Spring Lake Park will be
approximately $100,000 but if they had to purchase
the commercial property, it would be several hundred
thousand dollars.
Mayor Linke closed the public hearing at 8:26 PM and
reopened the regular meeting.
Mayor Linke reviewed the purpose of the consent agenda
for those present.
Motion/Second: Hankner/Blanchard to approve the
consent agenda, as presented, and waive the reading
of the resolutions.
5 ayes 0 nays
PZI
Approval of
Consent Agenda
Motion Carte
Mounds View City Council
Regular Meeting
--------------------------------
March 25, 1985
Page Five
Park Director Anderson reviewed the proposed develop- 10. Consideration o
ment of Greenfield Park. He explained the federal Memo Regarding
grant has been increased to $180,000 and outlined Greenfield Park
what would be done.
Councilmember Haake questioned if the 4200' trail
would be basically a walking trail.
Park Director Anderson replied it would be a crushed
limestone base, which could be used for bikes, but
that was not the original intent. He added the
biggest deterent against motorized bikes would be
the neighbors who would report them.
Motion/Second: Quick/Haake to approve advertising
or a : AM bid opening on April 17, 1985 for
Phase I construction of Greenfield Park
5 ayes 0 nays
Attorney Meyers advised the court has ordered a
motion, and recommended the Council adopt it.
Motion/Second: Blanchard/Haake that, subject to
the City s rights of appeal, to comply with the
order for judgement of the Ramsey County District
Court relative to Court File No. 484143 granting
Gregory A. Johnson's application for a rezoning of
his property at 2865 Highway 10 from R-1 single
family to B-3 commercial highway use with conditional
use permit for highway auto repair and with con-
ditional use permit for highway auto repair shall
contain the following restrictions: the erection and
maintenance of a privacy fence as required by the
Municipal Ordinance, the maintenance of the property
in a reasonable clean condition. the maintenance of
reasonable business hours for conducting his
business, and the restricted use of lighting so as
not to disrupt the enjoyment of p-operty by residential
property owners.
Motion Carried
11, Consideration of
Motion to Comply
with Court Order
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Bob Beutel, Chairman of. the Energy Council, reviewed 12. Report on
the workings of the Energy Council and introduced Energy Conserve
Rita Docken, the Energy Coordinator. Progriva
Ms. Docken reviewed the activities of the Energy
Council, which was formed in May 1984, and the
seminars and energy audits that have been performed.
Councilmember Blanchard reported she had taken part
in the seminar and workshop and found them very
informative and strongly recommended people attend
them.
Mounds View City Council March 25, 1985
Regular Meeting Page Six
------..--.r-r------r--.--r----------------
The Council thanked the Energy Council and Ms. Docken
for the work they have done, 0
Park Director Anderson distributed copies of the 13. Report of
1984 annual report for the park department. He Park Director
reviewed various financial aspects of the budget Anderson
and gave examples of the income received and how
it is spent. He also reviewed the activates
of the Park and Rec department for 1984 and the
first quarter of 1985 and outlined upcoming
plans for that department.
Police Chief Ramacher reviewed the first quarter 14. 1st Quarter
1985 activities of the Police Department. He 1985 Department
reported they are involved in the selection Head Reports
process for a new police officer and have narrowed
down the field from the 147 applications received.
He reported Jack Chambers has been promoted to the
position of investigator, and the Community
Service Officer has started,
Chief Ramacher reported the City will be complying
with the request from the Minneapolis Star and
Tribune for a listing of the arrests and crime
information from the department, which will be
published weekly, He reported it would also be
reported in the New Brighton Bulletin.
Chief Ramacher also reviewed the training the
department had received during the first quarter,
Director Thatcher reviewed the permits issued and
the inspections done during the first quarter. He
also handed ont a map of the proposed street
maintenance projects for 1985, and reviewed the
activities of the public works department.
Motion Second: Haake/Hankner to have the second 15. Second Reading
reading and adoption of Ordinance No. 386, an and Adoption of
ordinance amending Ordinance Number 319 granting a Ordinance No.
franchise to Group W Cable of the North Suburbs, 386
Inc., a Minnesota Corporation, to operate and
maintain a cable communication system in the City,
and waive the reading.
Councilmember Hankner - aye
Councilmember Quick - aye
Councilmember Blachard - aye
Councilmember Haake - aye
Mayor Linke - aye Motion Care
'
March 25, 1985
Mounds View City Council
Page Seven
Regular Meeting
Director Thatcher reviewed the bids received for
�k4.
ort of
16. public Works/
well and pump maintenance on Well
Community Dvlp.
Motion/Second: Haake/Blanchard to award the low
Director
bid for well and pump maintenance on Well #4 to
$14,282.00, according to the
Lane Minnesota for
specifications.
Motion Carried
5 ayes 0 nays
17. Report of
Attorney Meyers had no report.
Attorney
Councilmember Hankner had no report.
18. Reports of
Councilmembers
Councilmember Quick had no report.
Councilmember Blanchard reported the Planning
from the residents
Commission had received input
20 regarding the Kunz Oil Co. and will
on March
be making a recommendation to the Council soon.
Councilmember 11aake thanked everyone for their
stated she would
vote in the special election and
do her best to represent their interests. She
sponsored
also reported she had attended the meeting
Local Governments for
by the Ramsey County League of
officials, alongwithMayor Links, on
newly h elected
Marcfoi
Mayor Linke reported he had attended a meeting with
Met Council
Clerk/Adrilinistrator Pauley with the
the EAW and EIS programs and
systems committee, on
what had occurred. He reported the full
reviewed
Met Council will be considering the issue this
that Clerk/Administrator be
Thursday and asked
given the authority to represent the Council at
be done on
that meeting and ask that further stud%,
the issue.
Motion/Second: Quick/Blanchard to authorize
Council
TrPjR7X inistrator Pauley to represent the
at the March 28 Met Council meeting.
Motion Carried
5 ayes 0 nays
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reviewed what he plans to
present to the Council.
Mounds View City Council March 25, 1985
Regular Meeting Page Eight
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Mayor Linke reported he had attended a meeting with
Clerk/Administrator Pauley on March 22 with the
director of the Ramsey County Public Libraries, on
a proposed site in Mounds View, which if built,
would be between 1995 and 2000. lie stated they
would like to have the Library Board revise their
schedule to build the library within the next few
years, and stated he would the City to send
a letter to the Ramsey County Library Board and
Commissioners, stating that the City would provide
the land free of charge for the proposed building.
The land is approximately 3 acres in size, at the
corner of Long Lake Road and Highway 10.
Clerk/Administrator Pai.ley added the location is
within 150' of the location they have in mind already.
Motion/Second: Haake/Quick to authorize a letter to
the Ramsey County Library Board and Ramsey County
Commissioners offering the land
at the extreme western end of the Mounds View City
Hall property for the construction of a library.
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Mayor Linke reported he and Councilmember Quick had
attended the Ramsey County League Legislative
Committee meeting on March 21.
Mayor Linke reminded everyone of the City Appreciation
Dinner scheduled for March 29 at the Bel Rae Ballroom.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reminded the Council of 19, Report of
the three Saturday goal sessions that are Administrator
scheduled.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley recommended scheduling
the spring clean-up day for May 11, as the proposed
date of May 25 is Memorial weekend.
Motion/Second: Linke/Hankner to set the 1985
p�EngL°lean-Up Day for May 11, 1985.
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reviewed the information
he had received on the Star Cities conference and
recommended the Council make a decision on whether
to go so the registration could be sent in.
Mounds View City Council
Regular Meeting
-------------------------
^ Motion/Second: Linke/Blanchard to authorize Staff
to o tain two registrations for Clerk/Administrator
Pauley and a Councilmember to attend the Star Cities
conference, with the schedule for the councilmembers
to be determined at a later date.
5 ayes 0 nays
Mayor Linke thanked the cable television volunteers
and Jerry Skelly for their work in broadcasting the
Council meeting.
Motion/Second: Hankner/Quick to adjourn the meeting 20
at 9:4 PM.
5 ayes 0 nays
March 25, 1985
Page Nine
--------------
Motion Carried
Adjournment
tion Carried
PLEASANT VIEW DRIVE AND
J/ 4J/ YJ
7:40 p.m.
HIGHWAY 10 SIGNALIZATION
If you are speaking
attthis
shis sPuubetic Hearing,
please
Address
Name
_1