HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packets - 1985/12/16i
I'ly OF MOIINUS V 11-
CITY CODNC'IL
AGENDA SF.SSIUN
Oh:i•FMHER 16, 19HS
7:UU P.M.
1. Utsrus ,on with Mt. Hill HusAand•: H,•q•Uvliny !nsuranre
Risk Management
2. Discussion with C,rorye Winiecki R,•yzrdiny Ik•velopment
District No. 1
1. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Roclarding MSA Street
Project 1985
4. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Rrgardiny Well and
Pump Maintenance (We II No. 11 C I t y Project #86-1
5, ;'on+toeration of Staff Memorandum k,•gnrrling Ecmomir
Development Plan
6. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regardiny Expiring
Advisory Commission/Committee Appointments
7. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding
Loader/Backhoe
S. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding Review of
the Park Funding Alternatives Task Force Recommendations
1Ilk? ^ ..^
PROCEEDINGS Of' THE CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
KAMbLY COUNTY, MINNESOTA
Regular Meeting
December 9, 1985
Mounds View City Hall
2401 Ilwy. 10, Mounds View, MN 55112
------------------•----------------------------------------------------
The Mounds View City Council was called to order by 1. call to Order
Mayor Linke at 7:02 PM.
Tne Pledge of Allegiance was said. 2. Pledge of
Allegiance
MEMBERS PRESENT: Councilmembers Hankner, Blanchard, 3. Roll Call
Quick, Haake and Mayor Linke.
ALSO PRESENT: City Attorney Meyers, Clerk/Admini-
strator Pauley and Public Works/Community Development
Director Thatcher.
Motion/Second: Hankner/Haake to approve the 4. Approval of
November 25, 1985 minutes as presented. Minutes:
November 25, 1985
c ayes n navg
Motion CdLLi atl
There were no residents requests or comments from 5. Residents Requests t
and
the floor. the Floor
Mayor Linke asked that Item C be removed from the 6. Approval of
consent aaendd. Ccnse'lt Agenda
Motion/Spoon(:: Blanchard/Juick to approve the
consent agenda, minus Item C, and waive 'he reading
of the resolutions.
5 a;es 0 niys Motion Carried
Clerk/Administrator Pauiey explained the intent of 7. 2nd Reading ar,d
the ordinance is to reduce the current leve'. of Adoption if
insurance requirements the City has set for the
Ord. No. 01
liquor establisnments within the City, to equal
those set by the State.
Mounds View City Council 4
Regular Meeting ,.f 1
December 3, 19n,
Page Two
------------------------------
Motion!Second: Quick/Blanchard to have the second
reading and adoption of Ordinance No. 401, an ordi-
nance amending the Municipal Code of Mounds View by
amending Chapter 100 entitled, "Intoxicating
Liquors" and Chapter 101 entitled, "Non -Intoxicating
Liquor", and waive the reading.
Councilmember Hankner - aye
Councilmember Blanchard - ave
Councilmember Ouick - aye
^ouncilmembei Haake - aye
Mayor Linke - aye Motion Carried
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reviewed the intent of 8. 2nd Reading and
proposed Ordinance No. 392. Adoption of
Ord. No. 392
Motion/Second: Haake/Hankner to have the second
reading and adoption of Ordina.ce No. 392, an
ordinance establishing Chapter 28 of the Municipal
Code entitled, "Designation of Fund Balance of the
General Fund", and waive the reading.
Councilmember Hankner - aye
Councilmember Blanchard - aye
Councilmember Quick - aye
Councilmember Haake - aye
Mayor Linke - aye Motion Carr
Clerx!Administrator Pauley reviewed the intent of 9. 2nd Reading and
proposed Ordinance No. 400. Adoption of
Ord. No. 400
Motion!Second: Hankner/Blanchard to have the
second reading and adoption of. Ordinance No. 400,
an ordinance amending the Municipal Code of Mounds
View by amending Chapter 1P0 entitled, "Intoxicating
Liquors" and Chapter 101 entitled, "Non -Intoxicating
Liquor" and waive the reading.
Councilmember Hankner - aye
Councilmember Blanchard - aye
Councilmember Quick - ay(
Caunci.lmember Haake - aye
Mayor Linke - aye Motion Carried
Mayor Linke closed the regular meeting and opened 10. Public Hearing:
the public hearing at 7:10 PM. Development
District 41
Clerk/Administrator Paulcy made a presentation,
showing the area of the proposed development
and explaining that the City will request tax
increment financing.
There were no questions from those present.
December 9, 19K
Mounds view City Council page Three
Reqular Meeting
------------------------------------------------
Mayor Linke closed the public hearing and reopened
the regular meeting at 7:15 PM.
Councilmember Hankner questioned the advantage of
designating tax increment districts prior to any
specific proposals being made to the City. She
asked why they don't designate all open parcels
as tax increment districts.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley replied they would like
to designate this particular area at this time to
make the people aware of what is planned. He added
they could designate all the areas now.
Councilmember Hankner stated she was not in favor
of designating this area as tax increment financing
tonight, as the City CouilCil has a goal of having an
economic development plan drawn up for the City,
which they have directed Staff to work on. She stated
she felt this would be jumping the gun and it did not
make sense, as it would be inconsistent with the
City's goal.
Councilmember Haake stated she could understand how
Councilmember Hankner felt, and she agrees the goal
was to nave an ewn�r,,ic develcpment plan, however,
this is a very visable parcel and rather thar.
develop it niecemeal, she would like to see it
developed nicely.
Mayor Linke stated there is a developer who is working
on the site, attempting to come up with a development
proposal. He added that he feels each separate area
should be done individually, so they ran stand on
their own.
Councilmember Hankner stated she feels each piece of
property should be looked at clos-_ly, and determine
ed
its eligibility for any type Of financing. She admade
she sees no urgency as there has been no prup
osalfor the property yet.
Councilmember Haake pointed out there are four major
pieces u` land in the City that are open for development.
Councilmembers Quick and Blanchard stated they agreed
with Mayor Linke on aesignating the property at this time.
Motion/Second: Haake!Blanchard to approve Resolution
No. 1951, designating and establishing Development
District 11 pursuant to the provision of Section 472A.13
inclusive of the Minnesota Statutes and adopt a Develop-
ment District Plan and Development Program for said
Development District, and waive the reading.
Motion Carried
4 ayes 1 nay
Mounds View City Council
Regular Meeting V •- .. . _ .. _....a
_--- ------
Councilmember Hankner voted against the motion, for
the reasons she had stated earlier.
Director Thatcher asked the Council's consideration
of Resolution No. 1961, granting final approval for
Silver Lake Woods 2nd Addition. He explained the
preliminary plat had been approved by the City
Council on July 8, 1985 and Mary Anderson then sent
it down to the County, and had just now received it
back and was requesting final approval.
Motion/second: Quick /Il.m knur to appruve KuuuluLl,f❑
No. 1961, approving the subdivision of lands to be
known as Silver Lake Woods 2nd Addition, and waive
the reading.
5 ayes 0 nays
Director Thatcher asked the Council's consideration
of Resolution No. 1960, for the same reasons as
given on the previous resolution. He noted the
Council had approved the preliminary plat on
April 22, 1985, but that Rice Creek Watershed District
had not yet approved it, and recommended that approval
be a condition of the resolution.
Motion/Second: Haake/Hankner to approve Resolution
No. 1960, approving the minor subdivision of lands to
be known as T-inda Grant Addition, and direct Staff to
advise Mary Anderson Homes that no further approvals,
including the issuance of development agreements,
be authorized by the Cuuncil without approval from
Rice Creek Watershed District in advance, and waive
the reaaing.
5 ayes a nays
December 9, 196.
Page Four
11. Report of
Public Works/
Community Dalpt.
Director
Motion Carried
11
Motion Carried
Attorney Meyers reported that on March 25, 19R5, 12. Report of
the Council passed an ordinance, that subject to Attorney
the City's rights of appeal, to comp,y with the order
for judgement of the Ramsey County District Court
relative to Court File No. 484143, granting Gregory
A. John,on's application for a rezoning of his property
at 2865 Highway 10 from R-1 single family t�) B-3
commercial highway use with conditional use permit for
highway auto repair and which conditional use permit for
highway auto repair shall contain the following restric-
tions: the erection and maintenance of a privacy fence
as required by the Municipal Ordinance, the maintenace
of the property in a reasonable clean condition, the
maintenance of reasonable business hours for conducting
his business, and the restricted use of lighting so as
not to disturb the enjoyment of property by residential
property owners. Ile explained that the Court of Appeals
j
D
December 9, 198:
Round$ View City Counci- Page Five
Regular Meeting---------------------------------------------
-
has reversed the District Court's opinion, and the
Council must now rescind that earlier motion.
Motiun/Second: Blanchcr:1/Ilaatc to rescind the
motion regarding rezcning of Gregory A. Johnson's
property at 2865 Highway 10, Court File No. 484143,
restoring the original zoning of said property to
R-1 Single faiuily and rescinding Issuance of the
conditional use permit and all conditions set forth
therein as ordered by the Ramsey County District
Court.
5 ayes 0 rays
Attorney Meyers reported the Met Council has agreed to
an amended complaint in the airport lawsuit, and he is
in the process of serving MAC with the complaint.
Councilmember Hankner stated that in refurmwc to IJ
earlier discussions that evening, she feels the Council
needs to be proactive rather than reactive with
development in the City, and they need to look at
all types of financing available and be prepared when
potential developers come to the City. She added
the Council has give.. ctaff direction to move on
the economic development study, and they should move
as quickly as possible.
Motion Carrico
Reports of
Councilmembers
Councilmember Blanchard had no report.
Councilmember Quick heal no report.
Councilmember Haake had no report.
Mayor Linke stated he would .ike cc extend his
appon
the
ew
hat
ked
o well
therroadsly openduringrthetrecentrsnowsCo kee?
storm.
14. Report of Clerk/
Clerk/Administrator Pauley had no report. Administrator
Motion/Second: Hanknfr/Quick to adjourn the meeting 15. Adjournment
at 7:4
Motion Carried
5 ayes 0 nays
Respectfully submitted,
Donald F. Pauley
Clerk/Administrator
TO: Mayor and Council
FROM: Finance Director -Treasurer Brager
DATE: December 11, 1985
RE: RENEWAL OF INSURANCE AND RISK MANAGEMENT CONSULTANT
CONTRACT
At th< December 2, 1985 Agenda Session the proposed renewal
contract from Corporate Risk Managers Inc.,sthe CitAs
Insurance Consultant was p
resented and discussed. Position as
consequence of that discussion I feel than staffs that
adequate
resented adeq y
to the need for an insu.ance consultant and the source o
funding for the consultant's fees was not p
in staff's December 2, 1985 memnrandum.
The City first contracted with Corporate Risk Managers for
insurance and risk management services in i9R4 and that time
subsequently renewed that contract for 1985. During
and varied insurance and risk
they have performed many of Mounds View. The most
management services for the Cityis the writ
obvious task whiching of insurance
they P otiation of the plarament and
the two years that they
specifications, and the ney ocher tasks for
renewal of coverages. Howe have performed many adequacy of
have been on retainer theylevel and
Each year they have reviewed the
recomtendedachanges and
present insurance coveragesassisted in
and appraisal of City buildings and
presentations in those coverages. In 1984 they the City.
conducting an inventoryeCes of equipment owned by
contents and various p
Reco:..mende'Ions were also made as to modifications it
insurance coverages carried. The laced�withctferhomeh
were subsequently negotiated and p for City buildings
Insurance Company Pro•'"ied greater coverage
and contents and equipment as well ranbeoaraasdatonorages in
various liab,lity and property The Firm has also
additional premium cost to the City.
analysed the City
s Workers Compensation Proycer and has
worked with City staff a.id the insuenACer�arri
c)assifications and
classify workers as to workers comp
rates. These actions resulted in many workers being
than previous coverages,
healthcare
transferred to workers compensation classificaThe tiocs which w're
less costly for the City
staff in reviewing employ roved
has also assisted City Another Another area which has proved Risk
life insurance coverages*
been the efforts of Corp
oratebeneficial to the Cityhas
as staff with the reviewal of
Managers in assistingCity
audits. All of cur insurance
insurance company p
I
to
December 11, 1985
Page 2
premiums are deposit premiums, that is, they are based upon
estimates and are subject to final audit and billing
adjustment after the policy has expired. Corporate Risk
Managers has assisted City staff in reviewing these audits.
In one instance as a consequence of reviewal of Corporate Risk
Managers the auait premium was adjusted downward resulting in
a savings of premium dollar for the City.
The task of reviewing these audits has been made more
difficult by the lack of cooperation of our insurance agent
and/or insurance company. In order to properly review these
premium audits it is necessary to obtain copies of the
auditor's work papers as well as copies of the underwriter's
work papers which were used to establish the initial deposit
of premium. We have been able to obtain copies of the
auditor's work papers for the last two audits, however, we
have been able to obtain the underwriter's work papers only
with great difficulty. we received a billing as a result of
an audit in Ju1v and have not been able to determine whether
the additional premium requested by the insurance company is
justified due to failure of the agent and/or insurance company
to pravide us with copies of the undvrwriter's work papers.
We encountered this same problem last year.
Another area in which having an insurance and risk management
consultant h&s been proven to be extremely valuable to the
City is in the area of the review of the policies issued by
the insurance cc.apany and comparing the coverages contained in
those policies to the insurance specifications which the agent
bid on. In 1984 there were approximately one-half to
three-quarters of a dozen variances between coverages in the
actual policies as compared to coverages bit. After
correspondence and several telephone calls we were able to
straighten out the discrepancies and have policies issued
which were the same as the coverages bid. Thin year the
policies for our May 1, 1985 renewal were not received until
mid November. Those policies contain several instances in
which coverages bid were not contained in the policies
issued. staff and the consultant are in the process of
contacting the agent and/or insurance companies involved and
having these mattes corrected. It is, however, discouraging
to receive policies which are at variance with coverages which
were bid. These discrepancies could prove to be quite a
serious matter should a loss occur prior to those
discrepancies being resolved.
I am quite concerned about the future ability of the City to
obtain adequate insurance coverages considering the current
.insurance crisis' being faced by many governmental entities
nationwide. I have been advised by our insurance and risk
management consultant, as well as by other metro area finance
r_
December 11, 1985
Page 3
directors and school business officials, that the market for
governmental insurance in MinnesotA is shrinking very
quickly. inuring the past three months our present insurance
carrier, Home Insurance Company, has been refusing to renew
any insurance coverages for many of their governmental
c)ients. This fact combined with the withdrawal of many other
insurance companies from the governmental insurance market may
leave the City with two insurance rombanuos from which to
obtain coverage: The League of Minnesuta Cities Insurance
Trust (LMCIT) and perhaps Insurance Company of North America
(INA). At this time INA is a big question mark.
I believe that it is important now, more than ever before to
retain the services of an insuran-e conultant give❑ the
present market conditions and the past experience that the
City has had with it's insurance renewals.
The money budgeted for the renewal of the insurance
consultant's contract is contained within the City's 1985
Budget. The budgeted amount was $4,500. The proposed renewal
contract of $3,800 is $700 under budget.
The contract proposed by Corporate Risk Managers stated "this
contact is based on an estimated eight days at the rate of '
$475 per day. Any days over the estimated eight days will be
additional at the daily rate of 5475." I have contacted
Corporate Risk Managers and suggested a modification to the
contract. This modification would state that prior to
performing any work which would exceed the estimated eight
days Corporate Risk Manaqers would obtain authorization from
the City prior to performing any further work. Such a request
and the subsequent approval would be in writing.
RECOMMENDATION: Renew the insurance ano risk management
consultant services contract with Corporate Fisk Managers,
Inc. for the period 11/1/85 - 86 in the amount of S3,E00 with
the contract modifications presented above.
DB/ds
Insurance Agency M.. Nf H /10
omds VmwMN. MN 55411 • 611 780 $600
December 11, 1985
city of Moundsview
2401 Highway 10
Moundsv.ew, Minn. 55112
Attn: Mr. Pauley city Planner
bear Mr. Pauley,
I would appreciate if you cou.d schedule me on the council agenda,
for the meeting on Monday December 16, 1985. I would like to discuss
this new tax district 1 am in with the council members. I just want to
Ilighlight my viewpoints. I have already talked to all the council
members privately prior to the city council meeting on last Monday
evening. However I would like to discuss my viewpoints again with
them anJ it is much easier when they ate all together.
Phase let me know as soon as possible if you can arrange to have
this put on tl.e agenda.
Thank You,
Sincerely,
t
l: ��l._JL.:
George d. inliecki
a ct, 3
MEMO TO: Clerk-Adm u:islrator and City Council
FROM: Director of Public Works/Community Development
DATE: December 10, 1985
SUBJECT: M.S.A. STKEET PROJECT 1985
As you may know, R 6 S Asphalt Company, the contractor for the
1985 M.S.A. Street Project, has only a couple of minor items to
complete. They have submitted a final payment request.
Utilizing this information, I can update you on the status of the
project. The construction budget for this project is
5362,232.00. The construction was completed for S300,214.37.
Therefore, I am pleased Co report that the project was
constructed under budget by $62,000 or 11 percent. Since the
project is under budget, 1 would like to propose the purchase of
a drafting scriber that prints words and numbers on drawings
(Attachment W . I have received the following quotes for the
subject equipment:
1. K.S.I. - $2,095.00
2. C.E.I. - $2,!67.20
3, Minnesota Blueprint - 12,250*00
The equipment will save time drafting wi M.S.A projects as well
as other City )rojects. The equipment will pay for itself in
less than a 1-112 years.
RECOMMENDATION: I recommend the purchsc of the Mutho ET-36UO
scriber from K.S.I. for $2,095.00.
SM:/bac
Attachment
r
M ZJTI] H
MUTOH SCRIBERS
ET3600
High-performance Scriber
New Model
10
11.4
I—
QUOTATION
From
K S I L. ' 16121 721 7455
O., or Su,. 160o 328 5017
MWWMGPOFA, MN 5660
We or* plaa5ad to quote at follows Your ingmrY
Qaanary _--- DpKliplptt —
/ I
N"?-c,x
lagvey mo.y =--
7.�r!1r J .� - - -
hKas quarad m6
Fos— —
COPY EQUIPMENT.INCORPORATED
1000 WEST 79TH STREET MINNEAPOLIS, MN. 55420
612/884 3581
QUOTATION
October 28, 1985
City of Moundsview
2401 Highway 10
Moundsview, Minnesota 55112
Attention: Brian Hoffman
Much 53600 Scriber
I each
i45
f2,167.2U
Delivery 'n stock ThisQuotatimENectiw: 30 days
F.O.B
Above prices do not include applicable texe:.
IK/Irr
Twm; Net 30
By; T,m If I ng
DU: _ mmCNnee DRAFrINd — E prlltlnl
Innrumeree REoRODUCT*N— F.nemwnrg
jDgyEY1N0 — S_VaNr xWo.
okmp
2121 neit rive, ,,ad north • mmorapob., mmnoun, ALA' 7 • ynun, 1.12 o29 9281
October 24, 19,35
City of Moundsview
Attn1 Brian Hof frm,o
'401 Huy. 10
Moundsuiew, Paf 55432
6h take pleasure in submitting the following Quotation fort
P►itough's ET 3600 Automatic Scriber- S 2250.00
Kindly refer to our 4uotat ton no. 102485 when placing order for this
material.
Respectfully sunm,freA
Kevin Peters,
Sales Representative
KP,'t alit
a r c h.l ecr ur al a n a rn91near, nq s.pplrs and ser v, c0
,. 7
mF.mo To: Clerk-Adminl�ttrator and City t',e:nrl l / T
t'Rt1M: Director of publiv Works/C,immunity I31-v.'1-, .y�4'.
DA IT: lk'r.•mM'r II, 148S
SUBJECT: WELL AND pUMp MAINTENANCE IWHA, NO. it
CITY PRWECI' #86-1
Today, the !'ity received 4 bids on rho- subject prolact. The bids
are as follows:
I. Heryrrson-Caswell, Inc. S 14,992.0U
2. E. H. Renner i lions, Inc. S 15,186.00
3. Layne Minnesota Co. S 15,212.00
4. Keys Well Drilling Co. S 18,744.00
The 1986 budget allocates S16,800.00 for this work. The work is
needed because the pumping capacity has dropped from 1,000
gallons per minute down to 750 gallons por minute.
The low bidder, Heryrrson-Caswell, inc., has pertormed
satisfactorily for us on past projects.
RF.COMMENDATIt1N: I rernmmead awarding the malnlonanCe work on
Well No. I to Berge rson-Caswell, Inc. in the amount of
$14,992.00. The money will come from Water Fund Account
' $700-122-4123. The bids are under budget.
5WT/bac
Hfu t'tm
WELL AND PUMP MA1NTENANCK (WELL 11)
CITY PROJECT H6-1
CITY of MUIINDS VIEW, MINNESOTA
b1O PROPOSAL FORM
This hid proposal (price quotatinn) is due at C_Aru .
Drtf"ut,r: // , IYO'-J.
Public Works Department
City of Mounds View
2401 Highway 10
Mounds View, Minnesota 55112
t Dear Sir:
Having inspected the site and specitications as prepared for the
purpose of well No. 1 maintenance (inspection and repair)
Rergerson-Caswell, Inc.
hereby propose(s) and agree(s) to furnish all labor, tools,
materials and supplies to perform a complete repair service for
the City of Mounds View, Minnesota. This work is to be performed
in strict accordar.ce with the plans and specifications.
The City of Mounds View will tatailate the price quotations
teceived and select the contractor.
The undersigned agrees to complete al: work within sixty (60)
calendar days from the "Notice to Proceed%
The undersigned understands the following:
All price quotations must be written with typewriter or ink and
and must be signed with ink. Unsigned price quotations will not
be conside n:d. All quotes must be submitted on this fora and
enclosed in a sealed envelope addressed to the City of Mounds
View, 2401 Highway 10, Mounds View, Minnesota, 55112. Mark
envelope "well No. 1 bid Proposal".
- 1 -
It, on the Contract completion date, the Contractor has n,ir
completed all work required by the Cnntract to be COmpleted
on that date, the ()wner will deduct from any monies due or
coming due to the Contractor an amount equal to $5U.00 for
each calendar Jay the construction operations are carried n•�
by the Contractor after the Contract completion date.
The total of the deductions specified above shall be
considered reasonable liquidated damages due to the owner from the Contractor for his failure to complete the proj t
-
(or porttons thereat) within the specified time.
Neither by the act of taking over the work nor by the
annuilmeit of the. Contract shall the owner forfeit the ri.jht
to recover liquidated damages from the Contractor for
failure to complete the project within the specified time.
The undersigned hereby agree(s) to pertorm the work above at thr'
quoted prices.
Comparison bids will be based on the total bid.
signed h.•raer,o,n-Caswell Inc,
!Firm Name)
Address 5115 1ni r 1 Street
Phone '- -
By Name of f rer signing
Firm n„me and his offtcial
capacity.
Gary Hart, President
Date December 6, 1595 _.
V*A
CITY Uf MIUNUS YIt:W
8I1) PROPOSAL 1
WR11, N11. I-
MUVRMBF.R 14, 19R5
Item
No. Item __---
unit ^
Unit Price
Quantity
Total Price . .
1.
Remove, dismantle, lu itect,
L.S.
$ 2400.00
I
$ 2400.011
e reinstall pump
2.
lest Pumping of Well
hr.
$� 30.t1U
20
$ 600.00_
J.
box of packing
each
S ci0,11f1
1
$ 50, f1_I_
4.
Replace I- 7/16" x IU9" SS
each
$ 250.00
1
S 250 0 _
(4!6) Headshatl
S.
Replace stuffing box hush-
each
S 50.00
1
$ 50.(IO _
tag thread old style
6.
Replace b" spiders, Re-
each
$ 75.00
1
$_75.OJ_
place with screw --In spider
..'ly
7.
Replace R" diameter x 10'
each
long auction pipe
R.
Sine shaft rubber bearing
each
$_ 12.00
33
S '196_n0__
9.
Sandblast and paint column
L.F.
$ 2,00
330
$ 66n_n0 _
pine and suction pipe
10.
Sandblast and paint line
each
$
32
$ 96.0o
shaft
I1.
Re Dl ace R" x IU' column
each
S 1'.1i ni,
1S
S
pipe
I:.
Compete set of bowl
each
$ I so -tin
I
$_yam_
bushings
i:.
Replace I- 7/16" x IU'
each
$ 4i_Un
15
I,(,1 �c
$ 5
!lae shaft with sleeve
14.
Disinfect well 24 hours
L.S.
$_ �q_110
1
$ is nrl
prior to test pumping and
'
placing back In service
15.
Furnish video taped ptc-
each
$ 1 I 1 )_ to
I
S yjy_
16.
lure of well casing
Mobilization and demobili-
each
$ ;_uu
1
cation for video taping
CITY UP MUUNUS VIEW
BID PROPOSAL
WELI. Nu. i
PAGE TWU UP TW0
NUVewx 14, 1985
Item No.
Item — _—
Wit
Unit PriceQuantity
Total Price
17.
Pump parts, if required-
each
$ 1Y00j.00
1
Complete new bowl assembly
with wear rings (muomlt
specs on bowl assembly and
pump curve, 1,000 GPM at
370 TDP, minimum 80X errici-
eney at 1160 8PM required
w/416 S.S. bolts and coliets
18.
Batltng of wetl
Cu.Yd.
s Il1U,l1 t1
20
19.
Mobi I izat Inn and Demooi-
L.S.
$_ 100.00
ilzatiou
IWAL
a
%J
E.H. RENNER ✓: SONS INC
„fne 5' yw
ELK RIVER, MN 55330
(612) 4274100
HIU t'UR
WELL ANU PUMP MAINTENANCE (WELL 61)
CITY PRU,IL"t, H6-1
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW, MINNESOTA
HID PROWSAL FORM
This bid proposal (prier yuotalion) is due at 'C ,y
Pr Cf. eiwe n' // , 198',.
Public Works Department
City of Mounds View
2401 Highway 10
Mounds View, Minnesota 55112
Dear Sir:
Having inspected the site and specifications as prepared for the
purpose of well No. 1 mairtenance (inspection and repair)
_--- — f_M_ RE R j COY( 1W
hereby propose(s) and ayree(s) to furnish all labor, tools,
materials and supplies to perform a complete repair service for
the City of Mounds V.,ew, Minnesota. This work is to be performed
in strict accordarce with the plans and specitications.
ct �O_.^. �= v•a� ..:i� ••ti"laro rha ii,iee ountatlons
received and select the contractor.
The undersigned agrees to complete all work within sixty (60)
calendar days from the 'Notice to Proceed".
The undersigned understands the following:
All price quotations must be written with typewriter or ink and
and must be signed with ink. unsigned price quotations will not
be considered. All quotes must be submitted on this form and
enclosed in a sealed envelope addressed to the City of Mounds
View, 2401 Higriway 10, Mounds View, Minnesota, 55112. Mark
envelope "Well No. 1 Hid Proposal".
-i-
If, on the Contract completion date, the Contractor hae not
completed all work required by the Contract to be cumplet.-d
on that dat-r, the owner w111 deduct from any monies due or
coming due to the Contractor an amount equal to $50.00 for
each calendar day the construction operations are carried
by the Contractor alter the Contract completion dole.
The total of the deductions specifted above shall be
considered reasunable liquidated damages due to the owner
from the Contractor for his failure to complete the project
(or portions thereof) within the specified time.
Neither by the act of taking over the work nor by the
annullment of the Contract shall the Owner forfeit the right
to recover liquidated damages from the Contractor for
failure to complete the project within the specified time.
The undersigned hereby agree(s) to perform the work above at the
quoted prices.
Comparison bids will be based on the total bid.
t
Si,lned
(Firm Name)
Address .6:00 Industg Ave NIL_ __
.ANOKA, Nd 55303
Phone
by _AWN E. kenner, PkS'__1-
Name of officer signing
;irm name and his official
capacity.
Date Id/10/85
L I T1 UI MIMIS 1'I LY
g1U I'kupUSAL ,
WELL N0. 1
NWLMgk.k 14, 1985
':u. Item ^-----
Unit ----_
--_-
unit Price
Quantity
Total Price
Ices
--
I.
pemuve, disasntle, Inspect,
L.S.
S-
y,jQ0,0�
I
reinstall pump
2.
Test Pumping of Well
hr.
$
T2•SC_
20
S.
450.00 _
3.
go: of packing
each
$_
-2Q.Qf1_
l
$_
20.00 _
4.
Replete 1- 7/16" a 109' SS
each
$
?5U.00_
1
S
150. DO --
(416) Meadsnaft
S.
Replace sru/flog boa both-
each
S
SU.00_
I
S
50.00 _
ing thread old style
6.
Replace 8" spiders, Re-
each
S-40.Q11
S
-- _
90-DOce
place with screw -In spider
only
1.
Replace B" diameter s IL"
each
b
_100,00.
1
$
long suction pipe
8.
Line shaft rubber beating
each
b_
_14.00
33
S_-Afi2.00__
9.
Sandblast and paint
L.I.
pipe and suction pipe
10.
Sandblast and pain[ line
each
{--.1sW
32
$
_ L18.W _
r,haf r
it.
Replace B` a 10' rolusn
each
{_W.00
15
53,74Q..QQ
_
pipe
12.
CpmDlete set of bowl
each
{_50.00_
1
S
- 50.-DO _
bush!ngs
Il16' 10'
each
S
145.00
15
S
2,U5.UC _
13.
Replace I- a
line shaft with sIet vt
S
50.00_
1
5
50 00 _
It,.
Disinfect well 24 hours
L.S.
prior to test p,.sping and
'
placing back in service
5
836 .00
1
$
836.00
15.
Furnish video taped ptc-
rash
—
curt of well casing
5
100.00
1
$
I Obbi
16.
Mob111tatfun and des -bill-
rash
-
eatlon for video taplug
CITI uF MJfNDS VILLA
Sib rnitiuSAL
YLLL N0. I
PAGL TMO OF TNU
NOVEMbER 14, I9b5
Item No.
17.
18.
19.
-
Item --- Unit -_-- Unit Price
Pump parts, if required- each 5 3.300.00
Complete new bowl assembly
with wear rime (submit
specs on bowl assembly u.d
pump curve, 1,000 GPM at
370 TUN, minimum 802 effici-
ency at 1760 RPM requited
w/616 S.S. bolts and rollers
Balling of well Cu.Yd
Mobllttatlon and Dvm.Li- L.S.
liratlon
TOTAL
$ 50.00
$ 100.00
Quantity Total Price
I : 33 310.p_
70 S 1,000.00
$100.00
S 15,186.00
- 2 -
e. Well and Pump equipment Shall be completely disinfected pvr
Minnesota Department of Health procedures prior to placing
well an,l pump bark III s,ervlr,•.
W.ilvr !:.&milli• tl•st mall M•
provided by Contractor certitytng wall has boon adequately
disinfected.
Y. Well tih.ilI he Coot Illuously test InImiled to wA.1,• at a rAte of
at least 1,00o gallons per minute ter at least IU bouts ui
until water is flowing clear whieliever is (ireater.
Contractor shall furnish all piping, valves, pressure gauges,
orifice and other necessary equipmed by nt. Any
nyAdamage caused by
test pumping shall be
10. bid Pricr shall include lah,)r to install nr Affect all
repairs determined necessary after inspection of pump.
Separate bid prices are requested for various repair and
replacement items. Estimated quantities ter repair and bid
comparisons have been made. Final repair quantities shall he
aproved in writing by the City Engineer of Mounds View.
Final Contract Price shall he adjusted per unit bid prices
and final approved repair work.
11. The bid provides for an estimated amount of bailing of the
well. After initial removalOt pump
man esthe Contrted actor shalume
ll
submit to the City for approval
of material necessary to be balled from the well to
reestablish original well depth. Final payment shall be
based on actual cubic yard vnlume of mate real bailed from
well.
12. "ontract Award shall be based on lowest responsible bid
received. The City reserves the right to waive minor
irregularities and/or reject all bids.
W
- 3 -
CITY OF MunNDS VIEW
WELL No. !
2401 HIGHWAY 10
i3BSCAiPTION uh PUMP ANh wroic
I. Farrbanka-Mor.ia I1'i Hf and 1,760 RPM
2. Fairbanks -Morse vertical turbine pump
3. Pumping setting, 311 1-'et
4. Column pipe size, 8 inches ID
5. Shaft size, 1-7/16 inches
6. sowl type, 12 inches, 7-stage 1,000 GPM at 260 feet
DESCRIPTION OF WELL
'
1.
Inner casing diamerrr,
16 inches
2.
Length of Inner casing,
from 0 feet
to
492 feet
i.
Outer castny diameter,
24 inches
4.
Length of outer castny,
from 0 teet
to
290 feet
5.
well depth, 836 feet
6,
static ievel, 175 feet,
draw down a
40
feet P 1,000 GPM
'.
Wall complete 1/17/61,
last service
appru�unately
1979
u
HIU pUE
WELL ANU PUMP MAINTFNANCF (Wt:l.l. III
l'I'lY PHl1JECT 86-1
Cl'I'Y OF MUUNUS VIEW, MINNESOTA
HID PHOPO.sAi. t'UHM
This bid pripposai (pri,ve quotation) is due at iC
DeLi0, Jam' : / , 1985.
public Works Department
City eE Mounds View
2401 Highway 10
Mounds View, Minnesota 55112
Dear Sir:
1 Having inspected the site and specifications as prepared for the
purpos!e,,A well NO mainten ce (inspection and repair)
hereby proposelsl and agree(s) to furnish all labor, tools,
ce for
materials and suppllus to perform a canplete repair servierformed
the City of Mounds View, Minnesota. This work is to be p
in strict accordance with the plans and specifications.
The City of Pounds View will tabulate the prier quotation`
received and select the contractor.
Ti,- ,.nmers--uned agrees to complete all work within sixty (60)
calendar days from the 'e:.tice to Proceed".
The undersigned understands the following:
All price quotations must be written with typewriter or ink and
and must be signed with ink. Unsigned price quotations will not
be considered. All quotes must be submitted on this form and
enclosed in a sealed envelope addr,ssed to the City of Mounds
View, 2401 Highway id, Mounds View, Minnesota, 55112. Mar!:
envelope 'Well No. 1 Hid Proposal'.
-z-
It, un the Contract completion date, the Contractor has not
completed all work required by the Contract to be completed
on that date, the owner will deduct from any monies due or
coming due to the Contractor an amount equal to $5o.00 for
each calendar day the construction operations are carried on
by the Contractor after the Contract completion date.
The total of the deductions specified above shall be
considered reasonable lululdated damages due to the Owner
from the Contractor for his failure to complete the project
(or portions thereof) within the specified time.
Neither by the act of taking over the work nor by the
annulment of the Contract shall the owner forfeit the right
to recover liquidated damagesfromtthe Contractorhin the for
ed tlme.
failure to complete the project
The undersigned hereby agree(s) to perform the work above at the
quoted prt.ec.
Comparison bids will be based on the total bid.
ti —e,-,
irm amel
By i-
e of f r s gn
rm me and ficial
capacity
Date
�t
CITY OF HOUNDS VIEW
BID PROPOSAL
WELL NO. I
NOVEMBER 14. 1985
Item No. Item
Unit
i.
Ramove, dismantle, inspe, t,
L.S.
6 reinstall Dump
2.
Test Pumping of Ne!I
hr.
I.
Box of packing
each
4.
Replace 1- 7/16" x 109" SS
each
(416) Headshaft
5.
Replace stuffing box bush-
each
Ing thread old style
6.
Replace 8' spiders, Re-
each
place with screw -in spider
only
1.
Replace 8" diameter x 10'
each
long suction pipe
tl.
Line shaft rubber bearing
each
,.
Sandbiast and paint column
L.F.
pipe and suction pipe
10.
Saniblast and paint line
each
shaft
pipe
i2.
Complete set of bowl
each
bushings
13.
Replace 1- 7/16" x 10'
each
line shaft wirh sleeve
14.
Disinfect well 24 hours
L.S.
prior to test pumping and
placing back in service
15.
Furnish video taped pIc-
each
Cure of well casing
16.
Mobilization and demobill-
each
nation for video Esping
Unit Price
Quantity Total Price
$_I,YL'U.UU
1 $_7 2f30 OZ
$ 10.00
10 S 200.00
s Il.UU_
1 $-2LQJ_
$ 125,00
1 $ 125.00
$70.00
I $70.00
$ 65.00
1 $ 65.00
100.00
1
5 loo_na
$_ 14.00
31
$ 46?_n0_-
$ 2.50
330
$ A2S (if,
$ 10.00
32
5 329.0i7-
c I n fin
15
Z, 7 uii
150.00
1
S 150,00
$ 120.00
15
$1.800.00
$ 20.00
1
$ 20 D(
S 800.00
1
$ 800.0()- _
$ 50.00
1
S 50.00
cin OF MOUNTS VI"
BID PROPOSAL
YELL 40. 1
FAU TWO OF 'NO
NUVE4scot 14, 1985
—
—
Unit
Unit Price
Quantity Total Price
item No -
Item
S 2.b0.00
1 s 2.95Il.IlC--
I),
?uep par::, if required-
each
complete new bowl seeembly
with wear rings (submit
spec, on bovi assembly and
pump curve, 1,000 GPM at
370 TDH, minimum 802 effici-
ency at 1760 RPM required
w/416 S.S. holts and nil-tN
$ 10.00
20
is.
Bailing of well
Cu.Yd.
$ 1gG_00
I $_ 1pp.➢(1_..
Iq,
Mobilization and Demob1-
L.S.
lization
615, 21� _
TOTAL
bru t'UR
WELL ANU PUMP MAINTENANCE (WFI.I. 01)
CITY PNWECI' 86-1
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW, MINNESOTA
MID PROPOSAL t'URM
This bid proposal (price quotation) is due at
-j=Ci-)a-r' I/ , 1985.
Public Works Department
City of Mounds View
2401 Highway 10
Mounds View, Minnesota 55112
Dear Sir:
Having inspected the site and specitications as prepared for the
purpose of well No. 1 maintenance (inspection and repair)
Keys Well Drilling Company, A Minnesota Corporation
hereby propose(s) and ayreels) to furnish all labor, tools,
materials and supplies to perform a complete repair service for
the City of Mounds View, Minnesota. This work Is to be performed
in atrict accordance with the plans and specific,ittons.
The City of Mounds View will tabulate the price quotations
received and select t.ie contractor.
The undersigned agrees to complete all pork within sixty (60)
calendar days from tye "Notre to Proceed`.
The undersigned understands the following:
All price quotations must be written with typewriter or ink and
and must be signed vith ink. Unsigned price quotations will not
be considered. All quotes must be submit[eA on this form and
enclosed in a sealed envelope addressed to the City of Mounds
View, 1401 Highway lU, Mounds View, Minnesota, 551i2. Mark
envelope "Well No. I bid Proposal".
- 2 -
if, on the Contract completion date, the Contractor has not
completed all work required by the Contract co be completed
on that date, the owner will deduct from any monies due or
coming due to the Contractor an amount equal to $50.00 for
each calendar day the construction operations are carried on
by the Contractor after the Contract completion date.
The total of the deductions specified above shall be
considered reasonable liquidated damages due to the Owner
tram the Contractor for his failure to complete the project
for portions thereof) within the specified time.
Neither by the act of taking over the work nor by the
annullment of the Contract shall the Owner forfeit the right
to recover liquidated damages from the Contractor for
failure to compete the project within the specitied time.
The undersigned hereby agreels) to perform the work above at the
quoted pro -es.
Comparison bids will be based on the total bid.
Keys Well Prilline Cumpany
Signed A Miane ots Corporation
(Firm Nave)
Address 413 N. Lexingtun Parkway
St. Paul. Minnc;iota 5 104
phone (612) blu-7871
l 1
By
Na o Of tcer yny
Firm name and his of iclal
capacity.
Jeffrey W. keys, ^ecy./Treas.
Date I+•cemtwr 11, 1,)8"
J
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
bit) 11XnPnSAL
WELL NU.
I
NUVENBEN 14,
1985
Ilea No. —_-Ilea
Unit
Unit Price
Total Prl.e --_
Quantity
I.
P.emnve, dismantle, inspect,
L.S.
S .',800_ou
1
6 reinstall pump
2.
Teat Pumping of Well
hr.
$ _ 40.ou
20
$ boo.<<i
3.
Box of packing
each
$ 15. 00
1
4.
Replace 1- 7/16- x IU9" SS
each
S 4Lt o0
1
(416) headshatt
5.
Replace stuffing box bush-
each
$ 75.00
1
log thread old style
b.
Replace 8- spiders, Re-
each
$ 75.00
1
place with screw -in spider
only
7.
Replace N" diameter x 10'
each
lung suctlan pipe
8.
Line shaft rubber bearing
each
5_18.Do
33
$ 594.00
9.
Sandblast and pain[ n�lumn
L.F.
$ 4.nU
330
pipe and s..ction pipe
10.
$e,:dMast anA paint Ilse
each
$ 5• (10
32
$ 16o.id1
shaft
____ w^ . !no entumn
each
$ 220.00
IS
S_3,300.60
ptFe
IL
Complete se[ A bowl�
rich
S 65.00�Stage.
— —
1
$ 4 ,Il
bushings - 7 Stages.
0.
Replace i- 7/16" if 10'
each
IS
line shaft with sleeve
14.
Disinfect well 24 hours
L.S.
$ '
—
1
$
prior to teat pumping dnd
placing back in serv,�,
I5.
Furnish video taped p"
each
S i5•'J[J
1
S�—]�-=
Cure of well using
16.
Mobilization and de m,,hi ll-
each
$ 1,000.00
1
S 1.000.'c
ration for video taping
CITY OF MUUNUS viEw
BID PNUFUSAL
WUL NO. I
PAGE 1VO OF TWO /
NUVEMUEN 14, 1985
Item -----_-
Unit ------unit
Price
Quantity Total P!!ce____
Item
No.
I7
Pump part+• if required-
each
a 3,,2?1 -
_225^0,�.
Complete rev bowl assembly
with wear rings (submit
specs on bowl assembly and
pump carve, 1.001) GFM at
310 TOM, minimum 80% elilct-
ency at I7bO KPM required
w/4i6 S.S. bolts and collets
Cu.Yd.
$ 95.00
20 $-1,900_.�'_-
18.
bailing of well
I ri.
Moblltsattun and Demubl-
L.S.
5 1.000.00
1 $ 1�_WQ•�r-'--
llration
y 18,744.c_7
TOTAL
11
i..
MEMO rU: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL ^
FROM: i't.ERK-ADM I N I S1 RATORDATE: DECEMBER 10, 1985
SUBJECT: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Based on the direction received by Staff at the December 2,
1985 Agenda Session, the following wnrk program has been
developed for the Economic Development Plan. It should be
pointed out that this work program is an estimate of the
amount of time necessary to accomplish the work as we will
be subject to the limlt..t.ons of oth.rr governmental units,
i.e., Ramsey County Taxation Department and the United
States Congress when obtaining specific. information. I
would also anticipate that as we mov.• on in this study aid
present the Council with the results of specific portions of
the Plan, you will be providing additional or more detailed
direction which will extend out our time frames depending
upon the amount of additional work required.
I have attempted to outline the steps in the study in some
type of loyical format, assign responsibilities to
appropriate staff members, give an estimation of the time
necessary to complete the work, and provide an explanation
as to the type of information we hope to develop. The steps
of the study would be as follows:
I. Inventory of Brian Hoffman, 66-90 Days
Existing Businesses Michele Severson,
Don Pauley
The inventory of existing businesses will include an
identification of each business i.i the community, its
location, the square footage of the building in which
the business is InrArnr., and t', i..Aauie values for those
buildings. Because the taxable values and square footage
information is contained in Ramsey County records we will
be susceptible to delays resulting from obtaining the
information and I am estimating that it will take three
to four weeks for the County to provide that information.
2. Inve.itury of Brian Hoffman 1, 30 Days
Developable Land Steve 'Thatcher
The inventory of dev!lopanie land will provide
information regarding size of each of the parcels of
developable commercial or industrial property in the
City, their location, current zoning, land use
designation, assessed value, and if available, current
asking price for the land.
MAY41H ANI, 1'I I'Y I'01INC II.
DECEMBEH 10, 19"s
PAGE TWU
3. Determination of City Council 30-60 Days
Needs
This step cells for the City Council to make a
determination as to what you feel the achieveahle future
for the City in the area of F,cOnOmlc Development w,wld
be by identifying the types of businesses or develnpment
that would occur and the types of taxable values you
would hope to see result from this development.
4. Availability of Don Brag-•r 6 60-90 Days
Funding Don Pauley
This step would identify all federal, state and local
funaing sources available for accomlishing economic
development. Due to the fact that Congress is currently
considering a tax package which would restrict the types
of economic development incentives currontly avallahle
to municipalities, we would anticipate delaying this
report until we can get a better handle on exactly what
the Federal Government will be doing to our economic
development tools. The City Council will he involved in
the final step in this step by making some type of
determination as to level of assistance you feel you
would be willing to provide to businesses wishing to
build in the community. This will be an extremely
sub3ective process as you will have no specific projects
ZjrCncand will eimnly t,e vnirinn your nn�ninna wa
to what level of assistance you feel the City should he
providing in rather broad terms.
As we did not have a lot of opportunity to discuss the
detail of whet your expectations for the City's Economic
Development Plan might be, I would request that you meet
with me and discuss any expectations you might have with
respect to this plan as at the present time Staff is going
to be developing it based on what we feel a plan should
contain rather than receiving any specific direction from
you. Your assistance in outlining the contents of the
City's Economic Development Plan will make it more viable
for .he community and give greater assurance that it can and
w,ll be implemented upon its adoption.
Should you have any questions with regard to the contents of
this memo or desire to meet with me with respect to the
development of the Economic Development Plan, please do not
hesitate to contact Ine at any time.
Dt'P/mjs
_l
J
�/ w✓�L.� b
MEMO TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUN'
FROM: CLERK-ADMINISTRAT
PA'PE: DECEMBER I1), 1985
SUBJECT: EXPIRING ADVISORY COMMISSfON/COMMir-rEE
APPOINTMENTS
A review of the City's present membershiP on Advisory
Commissions and Committees reveals that the tollnwiny
members' terms of office will be expiring as of December 31
of this year.
Planning Commission - Eugene Anderson and Charlotte Forslund
Parks and Recreation Commission - David Long and Diane Wuori
Festivities Commission - Donald Hodges, Alice Frits and
Jerry Blanchard
Vacancies will also exist on the Energy Council as of the
end of this year, however, in a telephone conversation with
chairman Iloh H-'utel, I was advised that the rounril will he
submitting a recommendd[_ion reyardany thu tulutr ul tJn
organization after the first of the year and it would appear
appropriate to delay any action on these positions until
that report is received.
staff maid request Council direction in this matter.
DPP/mjs
cn
-VIr- 7
mcmu 'fus Clark-Adminl:;u atur and City +'ounrtl
i"%l FROMt Director of public Works/Community Developmen
DATEI December 10, 1985
SUNJECTt L4DADER/FACKNOE
The 1986 budget includes funds for the purchase of a loader/
backhoe. A loader/backhoe is needed because the existing loader/
Itackh.a• is 20 yuarri old .ind iti w'•.u-i'W .^il.
Attached please find the specificati"ns for a new or slightly
used loader/backhoe. Staff has spent many hours this summer
using demonstration baolihoes to detormine which ones moot our
needs. This specification is tight enough so that the City can
receive a loader/backhoe that meets our needs. However, the
specification is generic enough so that the following suppliers
can bid the equipment:
1. Case Model t680K
2. Ford Model t755
3. John Deere Model t610
1. J.C.R. Model #15506
5. Massey Ferguson
Each of these vendors has indicated that they will hid.
Staff has also analyzed the possibility of bidding the sale of
the existing loader/backhoe at the same time. We reviewed the
vondition of the existing loader/backhoe. The existing loader/
backhoe meets some of our needs as a loader, but dogs not
function satisfactorily or meet our needs as a backhoe". The 5
manufactirers listed above indicated that if they hid the
purchase of our old loader/ backhoe, the price would he approxi-
mately $2,000 to $5,000. The $5,000 verbal quote was from Case
Power and Equipment Company because our existing loader/backhoe
is a Case. Staff's impression is that the existing loader/
backhoe is worth much more than $5,000 to us as a loader only.
We could utlize this existing equipmnn+ a-. a ^r ^•1'l mn"
squeeze a few more years of service out of the loader. When the
loader wears out, we can sell the loader/backhoe at that time. A
second reason for not bidding the sale of our exisiting loader/
backhoe at the present time is that Case power and Equipment
Company would have an advantage in the bidding because they can
offer a higher price for the used loader/backhoe. Also, bids
seem to come in lower when the manuta•turer does not need to buy
and sell a used piere of equipment. A third reason for keeping
the exis ccn, loader is that this loader with the fro t hammer can
be utilized to break tr,+st during winter water/sewer repairs.
This will reduce wear )n the new equipment
RECOMMENDATION: i rev,,mmond that wr t,)r hills for a
loader/backhoe per the attached specifiemtl''ns.
SWT/hac
t'ITY of MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSFY
s'rATE OF MINNFS01A
AUVERTISEMENT FOR HID '
The City Council of the City of Mounds View, Minnesota, will
receive sealed bids for a loader/backh.n: with attachments on the
basis of cash payment. Hide will he r..rnived u'It il_-___-y.
lyy , at the City Hall. 2401 Highway iu, MOUnds View,
Minnesota, 55112, at which time and place all bids will be pub-
licly open and read aloud. Hids will he considered for award at
the next regular City t'nuncil. Prulxisals must In' plarr.l in a
sealed envelope with the statement thereon indicating proposal
bid contained within add addressed to the City of Mounds View,
Minnesota. PropoRals shall he submitted for the fiirnishiny of
all equipment and Proposal tams, including sprciti-
cations, are on file at the City Hall located at 2401 Highway 10,
Mounds view, Minnesota, 55112. All bids must he accompanied by
a certified check or hid bond payable to the City of Mounds View,
Minnesota in an amount equal to five percent (5t6) of the total
bid, conditioned that if the bidder is the Ruccessful bidder he
will enter into a contract in accurdance with said bid and will
furnish such performance bonds as are Rpecified. No bidder may
withdraw his bid for at least sixty (60) days after the scheduled
closing time for the receipt of bids, without urlae6t of the
owner. The City Council reserves the right to reject any and all
bids and to waive irregularities and informalities therein and
turther, reserves the right to award the contract in the best
interest of the City.
Dnnaid F. Paulay
Clerk -Administrator
J
C%
pRt•PuSAL FUR LOAVER/MACKIItit
tit MOUNDS V I CW, M I NNt:su'rA
UGCt.MBYR 9, IsMS
+:,•nr acme'):
The undcrsigned, hereby proposes to turnish a loader/backhoe with
attachments in accordance with the specifications dated December 9,
14tl5.
ITEM
Nu.
Ut:sC R I WI I CIN
5
!, furnish one complete loaAe[/backhu,• with _
all attachme.Its.
I'U'rAL
Manufacturer's Name and Model _ __—
option ti
Deduct for not furnishing and exrendable
dipper stack on the backhoe li.e., th.-
loader/backhoe will have a backhoe without
an extendable dipper stick it this option
is awarded).
UpL�
S
Deduct for not furnishing can, h.•.++.'r. —
tront wipers, re.,r wipers, tront
defroster fan, rear defroster fan.
upticn 13
Deduct for not furnishing backnoe
bucket quick change atta_hment.
upti�
Deduct for not turnishing rever,.+L l•°
stabilizer Fads.
option /5
Deduct [or not furnishing ditch bucket
S
for backl.je. Bucket Width. ---
Capacity -------
uption i6
1% 1-wheel drivO ,tvailabe? _Yes No S
if yes, add for tur-+ishing 4-wneel drive.
Proposal for Loader/backhoe
Paye Two of Three
Uecember 9, 190S
y. Answer the following:
it IAu's the loddr, /b.ickhoo hay.• i i ur h..
charger? Yes_ _
b) Alternator site
c) Front tire sire
d) Rear tire Size
e) Does the backhoe flip up over Yes Nu
renter when not operating?
t) Type of transmission
3. Furnish one sllyhtly used loader/backhoe (it
this item is awarded, the loader/hackhoo shall
include a one-year warranLy id.•A ir..1l tO it]"
warranties provided on new equipment).
Hours of operation
Manufactured by
(supplier shall turnish all available data on the slightly
usedloader/backhoe with the bid along with a list ct
attachments that shall be furnished.)
C. 'rhe equipment bid shall be furnished to
the City of Mounds View within _ -
calendar days after Notice of Award.
Accompanying this bid is a (bidder's bond) $certified check)
which is at least five percent (51) of the amount of my/aur bid
made payable to the City of Mounds View, Minnesota and the same
is subject to forfeiture in the event of detalt on the part of
the undersiyned or failure on the part of the undersigned to
execute a contract in accordance with said hid nr furnish a
performance bond within tifteen (15) calendar days of not .e of
award.
1t is understood that bids may not be withdrawn for a period of
sixty (601 days after the date and time sot for the opening of
hids. It is understiwnl that the City Council reserved the right
to retain the certified check or bond of the three lowest nidder-
as determined by the City Council for a period not to exceed
sixty (60) days after the date set for- the opening of bids.
IJ
pl po,jjI h-r t,sader/h.with.r•
Page Three of Three
Ikecesber 9, 195
In suhmitttng this bid it is understood that the City (" uncil
resorvas the right to reject any and all hide, to waive
irreguldrities and inforwalituIs therein, and to 3ward the
contract to the bust interest of the City.
I 1wreby arknowledyr ter,•ipt. of
REMARKS:
Respectfully submitted,
(A Corporation) (A
Fa[tnership)
IAn
Individual)
By-- - --------
Business Address
Te I eph ire No.
SPECIFICATIONS FOR L0A0F:R%BAVKHwK '
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW, MINNF'SurA
DECEMBER 91 1487
I. Bidders shall turniMh all available data on th.• ,•q,,ipm nt
beiny proposed to Ix furnished. The unit bid shall he a
standard production model.
2. 7'he i-quipment proposed to be turnished shall have r: .i
minimum the followings
a) 8U SAE net hp
b) Number of cylinders - 4
c) Type of tuel - Diesel
d) Fuel tank size - 23 gallons
el Traveliny speed - 17 mph
f) Loader dump height - 815"
g) Loader lift Capacity (Jbs.) - 5,80H Ins.
h) Stearing - Hydrostatic
i) Battery - 12 volt or 24 volt system
j) Loader:
Furnish a general material bucket with 96- width and
a minimum 1.25 cu. yd. capacity.
The frame shall be tnteyral with basic frame. Lift '
arms shall he solid steel with an attached safety
bar. All pivot pins shall be yrease fitted and shall
feature replaceable pins and hushinys.
Hydraulic System:
puaatity Bore Size
Function (minimum) (minimum)
Lift Cylin.Jers 2 3-1/8 diameter
xJ OdCKnoe:
Boom and dipper stick shall have welded box section,
continuous welds, and closed ends.
All pivot points to have replaceable pins and
bushings. Hardened pins Shall be retained by snap
rings and shall be equipped with grease fittings.
A lock shall secure boom and stabilizers in transport
position.
j
✓''
Speciticatlons tot Lu,lal,l uackhou
Pay. Two of Three
0ecember 9, 198S
Hydraulic Cylinders:
Ouantity bore Size
t'unetion (minimumI (minimum)
Boom iLitt) Cylinder 1 4.5" diaml•h•r
nipper (Crowd) Cylinder 1 4.0" diameter
hurkot Cyl Ind, 1 1 1.'." ai,un.•I, I
Swing Cylinder 2 J.l" dlamoter
Stabilizers 2 4.0" diameter
11 ILI, kh,N• oix-1.81 1":l pal l,•rn - .'-I• a, i ,,,;II 1'0-• will,
plus (+) pattern.
m) backhoe digging depth with extendable dipper
stick - minimum depth 1914".
n) backhoe bucket - minimum sizo 1R" wide.
flip up over center.
o) Second backhoe bucket - minimum size 30" wide
p) brakes shall be toot activated and self adjusting.
Brakes shall be hydraulic or tull air brakes. The
parking brake shall be hand or foot controlled.
The backho.•/loader sh.ill have a roll har, and fin• oxtin-
guisher. The fully enclosed steel all weather RUNS cab as a
minimum shall have safety glass throughout, 19,000 b1'll per
hour heater, front and rear defroster tans, trout and roar
wipers, 2 headlights, 2 rear working lights, tlashiny safety
light, instrument light and turn signals. The fully enclosed
cab shall be capable of being completely locked.
Instrumentation shall include a tac'lometer, fuel level gauge,
coolant temperature gauge, oil pressure gauge- ammeter, hour
meter, transmission oil temperature gauge, hydraulic oil
filter warning light, and volt meter. The front tires shall
he 10-ply and the rear tires snail be 12-ilv. the backhoe
ileve a Litt hook eye. The backhoe stabilizer
pads shall he reversable. The loader/backhoe shall have a
back-up alarm, fleshing rear tail lights for travel, and slow
moving vehicle emblem.
The radiator shall b,� turnished with anti-treere to -4u•t'
(-4°C).
The loader/backhoe shall have a horn, mutfler, and cold
heather start kit. The loader/backhoe shall hove, a tool box.
4. Attachments
A Wall -Roy, American O,upler or approved equal quick-Chanyi-
attachment for the bat4lioe bucket shall b,• turnished and
installed on the backhoe prior to acceptance of the
lnader/backhoe. The supplier shall turnish a ditch bucket
(bidder shall indicati• slze). The supplier shall turnish a
minimum 2.5 cu. yd. snow loader bucket.
Spvl l t I Cdt l Unss for LAIddoI/haC6 II, N•
Page Three of Three
December 9, 1985
S. Tho htdder shall furnish a reference list that inl-Iud" 5
owners of similar equipment located in Minnesota. The list
shall include a name, address dad phone number for
feach
or over
owner. Each owner shall have owned the equip
mPnt tive years.
ri
MEMO TO: Mounds View City Council
FROM: Bruce K. Anderson, Director
Parks, Recreation and Forestry
DATE: December 12, 1985
RE: Park Funding Alternatives Task Force
Enclosed is a variety of information regarding the meetings of
the Park Funding Alternatives Task Force that was estahlished by
the Mounds View City Council. The Task Force has scheduled their
last meeting for Thursday, December 12, 1985 at which time they
are going to be finalizing a recommendation which will be pre-
sented to the Council on Monday evening. A formal written report
will be prepared by staff following Thursday evening's meeting
and mailed to each of the City 'ouncilmembers regarding their
spec ific position. At this time, it appears that they will be
recommending that the City Council consider establishing a park
referendum on January 21, 1986 in the amount of $1.25 million.
There is a variety of information included for your review which
C outlines the Task Force process to date and staff will be on hand
at mciiday evening's meeting to present the Task Force findings in
person.
Should you have any questions regarding the enclosed information,
feel free to give me a call at 784-3055, ext. 120.
ono/eii
Enclosure
MKMD';U; Mouuds Vl,•w Park% al err,rat lun 1'.mlml;Klrul
I �
Fmom: Nrucc K. Ander'rrn l 'tor
Parks, M,Creatloit entry
DA'IK: April 22, 1485
M kit rstabl lsnllK•nt „t Tank F.1-ce t,,r Park Funding
Alternative'.
As you are aware, slalY broached Inr' Ins• witl, the Park Cumml3-
3lor, at last Iaontn'S meetilry abn w•IN nlCe.'f,d by [M! CUIOrnI SSlnn
L:+ develoP %W"Itle eriterta es t-1 how the ta+K 1,1rce inlyht func-
tion.
SLatt would Perceive the task tor.:.• fuuctlolun.2 as tulluws:
linealaykItforce
wruldwI*' larg ra Appointnrnlhy tileaMounds VmiewLCtty
Counrl 1.
2. me task torte would have representatives frills each Of the
exist unJ alhl.•1 rr a•: p,u•.,1 n+n� un'lu•liny I+181 nor limited tat
a. Iroudale Masketball Association
n. Lake 14x key
C. Mounds Vlew/New brtyhtun Soccer Association
1 d. Muuuds View Athletic: Ass,n'rati,+n
e. Mounds View Football A33ocidt"N'
f. AduIC sot th.,l l
y, Mou,,ds V.ew wrestling Club
.w �..:.... n. Inral aCPIet IC aSfr),. I: LluO YupCeSea LdCi VeS.
representatives wouln he suuynt lr m lacal
ty oryan:zatiOns includLr,y, but not limited to:
a. Mounds View Lions Club
b. Local boy Sc,.uts and Girl Scout+ troops
C. Local P.T.O. and r_lated school nryanizations
d. Gruveland Park Foundation
e. North Suburhan Chamber ut Commerce
4. The yruuP would meet for a Perlud n,+t. to exceed three months.
5. The task fore, re slknrslhI I I t y w,.0 1d IK: arc h,l l•+ws:
a, To ,valuate the city G+mprunensive Parks and Open Space
Plan and aotormine our pruyres3 to dat•.. r«yarding Imple-
mentati0h .
-1-
b. Evaluate IIIIvrent Iwufuul pn-,rIt1,••, •,+ to n-,v the Parks
and opeft spdt,,r Plan can he impl,11ft-111I d. This phase ('of
their assiynmeut w,wld uu•lude tout n-+L DO limited to:
( 1) Park land retererWum,
(L) Establlshment of spvrla) tdiill"J li,trictl.
(3) Additional tinanrtal numnittmunr by the Mounds View
City Council.
c. The task t,irce would .:v,,luat.• ,existitiy programs ana
determirie whit additumdl tactlitles dft,l/ur pruyrams an:
needed on a cummunity-wide hasls.
6. The task force would also Include reprusentattves from the
Mounds View City Council and Parks and Recreation Commission
as well as the mounds View Parks and kecreatlon uepartment
statt.
7. The task force would repurt back to the Parks and RecreatiOn
Commission witn a report no later than tnree montns after
being tormed, outlininy specitic recommeudatiuns as tO how
the tindinys of the task force.
H. The Parks and Recreation CudimissiOn would then hold a public
neariny to review the task force result', prior to formal sub-
mission to the CiLy Council.
9. The report would then be adopted, rejected or accepted by the
Parks and Recreation Commission and Passed onto the City
Council for their review and/or final action.
!b. The City Council would take the next steps necessary to
Implement, reject or accept the td',k t,irce and Park and ReC-
reition Commis',tun tindinuR .ls sl'tmirrs.n
11, Implementdtlon would theft he the ruspi)usihllity of staff to
ensure that the recummendations are accompltshed as outlined.
st.itl wuulA apprecidte any input ur vo mirrnts that you might have
i :n this area to expand on this concept.
HKA/slI
fA
MEMO TO: Park Fundinq Alten,atives Task Force
Mounds View Parks and Recreation Commission
FROM: Bruce K. Anderson a Iorl'
Farks, Recreation' an F ys[1'.y'
DATE: December 11, 1985 ��
RE: Park Bond Referendum
The following is a hreakdown of the proposed park improvements as
agreed upon at the December 5, 1985 Park Funding Alternatives
Task Force mestinq.
1. Community Center/Natural Ice Arena - $650,ODU
This facility would include a natural ice arena, general
seating area, pro shop, kitchen facilities and concession
area.
II. General Park Improvements:
A. Buildings and park shelters
1. Silver View Park - $30,000
2. Greenfield Park - $30,000
B. Picnic and free play area
1. 70 picnic tables at $150 each - $10,500
2. 20 new grills at $200 each - $4,000
3. 10 bike racks at $20U each - $2,000
4. 5 drinking fountains - $5,000
Total General Park Improvements - $19,000
III. Walking trails - $159,425
I`/. Site amenities.
A. Paving of Silver View Park larking Lot - $80,000
(including ecncrete curb and quttvr)
B. 20 trash cement trash recipticles at $200 each - $4,000
Total site amenities - $84,000
V. Play areas:
A. City Hall Park - $25,000
B. Silver View Park - $35,000
C. Hillview Park - $20,000
,
D. Woodcrest Park - $10,000
-2-
F. Lambert Park - $8,000
,
F. Oakwood Park - $10,000
G. Greenfield Park - $25,000
Total of $133,000.
VI. Softball/baseball development.
A. Lighting of two Silver view
Park Fields and soccer
field at a cost of $76,225.
VII. Two lit tennis courts at Groveland
Park - $50,000
VIII. Four sets of horseshoe courts at
Greenfield Park at $500
each or a cost of $2,000.
Total proposed improvements ................
$1,176,210
less 101 for City being the general .....
1,058,589
51 contingency .. ... ....................
52,929
88 for engineering/consultant fees .........
84,687
Bond consultant ............................
10,000
TOTAL REFERENDUM COST ........
$1,206,205
MTN11TFv OF THE PROCEEUINGI� OF THE
PARK FUNDING ALTERNA:IVF TASK FORCE
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE: OF MINNESOTA
November 7, 1985
Mounds View City 4all
Council Chambers
6:30 p.m.
CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order
informally at 6:35 p.m.
ROLL CALL Task force members present: Neal
Valley, Todd Wilts, Barb Depew, Les
Tatarek, Linda Pavek.
INTRODUCTION AND BACK-
GROUND IN ESTABLISHMENT
OF TdE TASK FORCE
Park t, Recreation Commissioners pre-
sent: Chairperson Wayne Burmeister,
Commissioner rrank Siivin.
Councilmemhers present: Mayor Jerry
Linke, Councilmember Gary Quick.
Staff present: Parks and Recreation
Director Bruce Anderson.
Mayor Jerry Linke weiceme each of the
task force members and provided a
brief background as to the purpose of
the task force. He stated that the
City Council was seekina input from
community residents regarding possi-
ble funding aiternatives for the
future de%elopment and maintenance of
the City's park system. He further
indicated that a park referendum
would be one alternative, but that
the Council was seeking a,iy other
additional thoughts and/or policy
questions that the task force felt
needed to ho addressed.
-2-
REVIEW UtCOMPREHENSIVE
PARKS AND OPEN SPACE PLAN theff "walked"
development tOf('the Cityuoh the '1ssCompre-
hensive Parks and Open Spaces Plan.
Following a brief background on the
survey forms, community demographics
and determination of needs survey,
staff discussed how the actual park
design process worked for each in-
dividual park. Each of the neighbor-
hood park plans were reviewod and
discussed from their existing
During
to the proposed design phase.
this process, there were a number of
questions raised by the task force
including the role of Lake Region
Hockey's coneoltant report on con-
structing an ice arena, as well as
plans for future school district
....a n.k School,
development inciUu&"Y ^� q ccer
which has been proposed as a
complex.
Finance Director Brager provided an
CURRENT FUNDING OPTIONS
overview of the 'ity's funding sour-
ces including revenue sharing which
is scheduled to bn elininated and
State a.,d Federal IranLs which pa e
been greatly reduced during
the331
five years. In addition to the dis-
cussion on the City's current mill
Aiatrl-
levy, Finance uirecCUL gc-
buted of Fie Charts
outlining 1985
Staff
revenues andexpenditures.
also distributedcopies
pro-
posed 1985 and 1.o86 capital
improve-
ment requests to outline other 'com-
peting' projects within the City.
Addditional financial data, including
a survey of surrounding municipal-
ities and a detailed background of
the City's park and recreation budget
for the past nine years was also dis-
tributed to the task "
e.
-3-
ESTABLISh NEXT MEETING
UATE It was the cnncenw,s that Thursday.
November 16 would be the next meeting
date beginning at 7:00 p.m. rather
than 6:30 p.m. .titnff indicated that
some additional support documenta-
tion, including an agenda, would be
forwarded before Thursday's meeting.
ADJOURNMENT The meeting was informally adjourned
at 8:35 p.m.
t
./—Relpectfu y-mtted,
�(L(—
rB uge K. Ar#erson, Director
Parks, Recreation and Forestry
0
C
CITY OF MOUNDS VIFH, MIt.,FSOTA
$1,250,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION
BONDS, SFRIES 1986 A
Residential
Homestead Property
TAX BILL IMPACT'
PPFPAPFD DFCrmerp 1, 19P5
BY SPRINGSTED INCORPORATED
Mill Rate: 99. 165
Estimated Increase: 2.230
Estimated Mill Rate with Project: 101. 395
SECTION A - 1986 PROJECTED TAX PAYMENT NITNOUT PROJECT
Al Estimated Market Value: 40,000 50,000 601o0V 70,000 80,000 90,000 100,000 110,000 120,000
A2
Assessed Valuc:
7,20n
9,no0
10,800
13, 290
16, 160
19,060
21, W
24, 560
21.?£0
A3
Cross Tax:
711
892
1,071
11315
1,603
1,890
2, 178
2,465
2,753
AI
Less Homestead Credit:
386
492
S79
679
479
679
679
619
679
AS
Property Tax Bill:
!28
410
493
636
924
1,211
1,499
1,786
2,074
SECTION B - 19116
PROJErTED
TAX
PAYMENT
WITH PROJECT
el
Va-taA market val _u•
10 "0
5M ,1O
fO ,00
7001O
On ,V,n
9n not
inn n��
� nAn
•24,860
,2n ,1Aa
52
Assessed Value:
7,200
9,000
10,600
13,260
16,160
19,060
21,960
27,760
193
Gross Tax:
730
913
11095
1,311
1,639
1,933
2,227
2,521
2,015
89
Less Homestead Credit:
394
493
591
694
694
694
694
694
694
85
Property Tax Bill:
336
420
504
650
945
1,239
1, 533
1,827
2,121
ESTIMATED
1986 TAX INCPFASE
DU"
TO PROJECT:
SR
Stu
$11
$14
$21
S28
$14
$41
:17
-The above schedule shows the estimated :ncrease in taxes payable at various
market vrlues if the estimated mill rate :nrrease due to the above project
were added to the curreit mill rate for taxes payable rr 1986. The 9cnedu'u
does not include the Property Tax Refund to which a taxpayer may he enu tlee..
based on family income. It does, however, reflect the deduction of homestead
credit whirh is automatically calculated aad deducted by the count,.
r,atimated market aalue is the basis from which assessed value is calculated.
This val,:e is not necessarily the price the property wouie bring if sold.
CITY OF, MOUNDS VIEW, MINNESOTA
$1,25C,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION
BONDS, SERIES 1966 A
SCHCDULF. B
DATED: 5/ 1/1996
MA%A E: 2/ 1
PREPARED DECEMBER 3, 1985
BY SPRINGSTED INCORPORATED
8.500%
ANNUAL
LEVY
LEVY MATURE
PRINCIPAL
INTEREST
TOTAL
(1051;
(1)
(2)
(3)
(l)
(5)
(6)
1986
1988
0
185,938
105,938
195,235
1967
1969
30,000
106,250
1361,50
113,90
1988
1990
35,000
103,700
138,700
145,635
1989
1991
40,000
100,725
140,725
147,761
1990
1992
40,000
97,325
137,325
144,191
1991
1993
45,000
93,925
138,925
145,071
1992
1994
50,000
90,100
3101100
147,105
1 YY]
IYYtl
w,VUu
eo,eov
y» ,ew
♦•a,o•�
1994
1996
55,000
811600
136,600
143,430
1995
1997
60,000
76,925
136,925
143,771
1996
1990
65,000
71,825
136,825
143,666
1907
1999
70,000
66,300
136,300
143,115
1998
2000
801000
60,350
140,350
147,368
1999
2001
85,000
53,550
1381550
145,478
2000
2002
90,000
46,325
136,32S
113,111
2001
200,
100,000
38,675
138,67S
145,609
20C2
2004
110,000
30,175
140,175
147,184
2003
2005
120,000
20,825
140,825
147,866
2004
2005
125,C00
10,625
135,625
142,406
TOf7.LS:
$1,250,OOJ
$1,420,798
S2,57J,988
F2,804,538
BOND YEARS: 16,718
AVERAGE MATURITY' 13.31
AVG. ANNUAL RATE: P.6121
ASSESSED VALUATION:
ANNUAL INTEREST COST: $1,420,998
DISCOUNT (PREMIUM): 23,750
TOTAL INTEREST COST: $1,I41,730
$65,127,765
AVERAGE ANNUAL LEVY REQUIRED $138,323
(COLJMN 5 , LEVY YEARS 199F THRU 2003)
AVERACF WITH 51 OVFPI.FVY $115,210
(COLI'MN 6 , L'VY YEARS 198P THRU 20031
2.12 MILLS
2.23 MILLS
•
MINUTLS OF 'nit; PROCEr:nl Nt;s OF 'nil,
PARKS FUNDING ALTERNATIVES TASK FORCE.
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
SI'A11 OF MINNESOTA
November 26, 1985
Mounds View City Hall
Council Chamber.;
7:00 p.m.
CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order informally at
7:05 p.m.
ROLL CALL Task furor mrmbvr Iuo vent: Neel Valley,
Barb Depew, Fred Kaiser, Todd Wilts.
Park 6 Recreation Commissioners present:
Chaiperson Wayne Iturmeister, Commissioner
Frank Silvis.
Councilmembers present: rniinoilmomhAr Gary
Quick.
Staff present: Park 6 Recreation Director
Bruce Anderson.
INTRODUCTIONS
A brief introduction of each of the individu-
als present was made around the room.
REVIEW OF M?NUTES FROM
NOVEMBER 7 MEETING
Staff reviewed the minutes from the November
7 meeting and clarified a few minor questions
regarding budgetary figures that were pre-
viously distributed.
PARKS AND RECPEATION
PRNRAM OFFERINGS
Stafr distributed a list of the currant pro-
grams being offered through our department as
well as participation figures for 1984 and
portions of 1385. Staff indicated that our
department had a very positive -esoonse and/
or acceptance from the community ane that our
programs had currently outgrown our existing
park facilities. Staff also alluded to the
current programming efforts beinq made at
Edgewood Community Center inclvdinq daytime
programs as well as cocrdina!ion of the com-
municy center pool.
There was some discussion regarding the par-
ticipation in our adult athletic programs and
Fred Kaiser, task force member, indicated
that adult softball was an extremely popular
program within the community and staff indi-
cated that there are approximately 150 teams
currently participating in our adult softball
leagues.
-z-
CURRENT PARK
DEFICIENCIES staff reviewed the parks and open space mas-
ter plan which addressed the current diffi-
ciencies within the City's park system.
There were three major areas that staff dis-
cussed;
Upgradinq of Silver View Park which cur-
rently serves as our City's main communi-
ty center including paving of the parking
lot to reduce vandalism as well as re-
solve the current drainage problems and
lighting of the two softball fields and
soccer/football fields. Staff stated
that we also need to install an irriga-
tion system and generally improve the
maintenance to accomodate handle the
volume at Silver View Park.
1. The City recently constructed ttS tirst
two tennis courts at Greenfield Park, and
staff feels that two additional tennis
courts are necessary at Groveland Park.
3. The City currently has eight neighborhood
8cko-d si„e . f the sites have play-
, ..
ground equipment that is a minimum of ten
years old and currently in need of repair
and/or replacement.
In addition to these three major areas, staff
indicated that our park maintenance is aur-
rentiv extremely deficient and referred back
to a survey with neifhboring communities com-
paring park mainteni^ce expenditure on a per
capita basis. The park deficiencies as out-
lined by staff were basically agreed upon by
the park fundinq alternatives task force and
the need for upgrading of Silver View Park
was s[ronyK_iy �...,,,.:.,.-.,td Ly •..- ,. .._,.•••
active participant in the adult softball�pre-
gram.
PAST PARK REFERENDUMS Staff indicated that two referendums had
occurred within the 'ast five years. The
last being on August 18, 1980, Both of which
failed by a 5 percent margin.
Staff indicated that he felt the referendums
were not successful due to an issue of tim-
ing; i.e., the school referendums and general
presidential election.
J
-3-
LAKE REGION HOCKEY
UPDATE Staff indicated that he had met with Leonard
Krumm, a representative from Lake Region
Hockey, who indicated that Lake Region Hockey
would be very supportive of constructing some
type of an natural ice arena. Although he
was not able to speak formally to the board,
he felt that they would be interested .n
buying as many hours as available for their
in houLe as well as traveling hockey league
programs. Mr. Krumm further indicated that
Lake Region was currently developing a feas-
ihility study for the construction of an ice
arena within the school district, and indi-
cated that they felt a strong need for to
construct an artificial arena within the
school district.
NEXT MEETING DATE The next meeting date was established for
Thursday, December 5, 1985 at 7:00 p.m. at
which time the City Council and Park and Rec-
reation Commission would be invited to attend
an open discussion. It should be noted that
it was the general consensus of the group at
this time that a park referendum appeared to
be the only alternative to fund the existing
park deficiencies. Staff was directed to
solicit background information on a possible
park referendum and report back at the Decem-
ber 5 meeting.
ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjou u,ed at 9:20 p.m.
R ctfully s itted,
Bruce K. n r on, Director
Parks, ttefeation aad Forestry
BKA/slI
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
2401 Highway 10
Mounds View, MN 55112
RE,)UEST FOR PROPOSAL
FOR
ARCHITECTURAL CONSULTING SERVICES
SCOPE OF PROJECT:
The City of Mounds View is currently reviewing the feasibility of
constructing a large (33,000 square foot) enclosed shelter build-
ing which would house a natural ice rink facility during the
months of November - March and which would, in addition, have the
flexibility of having the sides be removed to become a large
open-air picnic shelter in the summer time. The proposed budget
for the project is $650,000 which will include 33,000 square feet
of enclosed space, natural ice rink, kitchen, bathrooms, spectat-
or seating and pro shop/concession area. The facility would be
constructed at Silver View Park, a large community park located
in the geographic center of Mounds View and be funded tulluwing a
successful park referendum in January of 1986.
ROLL OF THE CONSULTANT:
The City is currently requesting proposals from architectural
firms to serve as a technical consultant to staff in the follow-
ing areas:
1. To review, refine and critique the conceptual plans submitted
by staff outlinq both positive and negatives features. This
phase of the report would include a written report analyzing
the concept from three specific phases.
a. Engineering and design.
b. Aesthetics �s practicality.
C. Programming potential including building flexibility.
2. Providing tecnnlcai rezaatu, u, L.:cc �'+ r aroaa•
a. Research of existing natural ice arenas including their
successes and failures compared to artificial ice arenas.
b. Determining the best mears for ventilation and/or airflow
to eus.ire a high quality, }ear round facility.
C. Review the building design from an ongoing maintenance
perspective.
1. The architectural consultant would provide a written
cost estimate reqarding the cost of the project to determine
whether or not it could be built within the allotted budget;
broken down by specific categories, i.e.:
a. Excavation and backfill
b. Footings and foundation
C. Roof structure
d. Insulation
Request for Proposal
Architectural Consulting Services
page two
e. Slab on grade
f. Doors and windows
q. rloor coverings
h. Painting
i. Miscellaneous carpentry
j. Millwork
k. Electric
1. Mechanical
M. Rink systems
0. Wood wa:ls
o. Brick face walls
4. To provide technical assistance in the area of engineering to
determsne if the building could be constructed at the site as
proposed and what additional engineering concerns Thisuld be
thought of prior to constructing such
iningfacility,
fic engineering
ld
again include a written rep..r_
n,iticoncerns, outlining areas
of concern
nof the prhat should he consid-
ered prior to formal approval
Bid proposals will be accepted until Friday, December 13, 1985 at
4:30 p.m, and should be submitted to:
Bruce K. Anderson, Director
Parks, Recreation and Forestry
2401 Highway 10
Mounds View, MN 55112
1-612-784-3055
. t.
MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE
PARKS FUNDING ALTERNATIVES TASK FORCE
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE. OF MINNESOTA
December 5, 1985
M,)unds View City Hall
Council Chambers
7:00 p.m.
CALL !U ORDER Iliv meeting was called Lu under -nturmally at
7:05 p.m.
ROLL CALL Tnsk force members present: Linda Pavek,
Neal Valley, Fred Kaiser, Barb Depew
Park d Recreation Commissioners present:
Diane Wuori, Frank Silvis, Ed Letendre, David
Long and Chairperson Wayne Burmeister
Councilmembers present: Mayor Jerry Linke,
Councilmember Gary Quick
Staff present: Parks and Recreation Director
Bruce Anderson
INTRODUCTIONS
Introductions were made around the room
including community service groups and/or
agencies that each individual might represent
as well as a brief review of each individuals
family background.
COMMUNITY CENTLR/
NATURAL ICE FINK
Staff reviewed a memorandum that was Distri-
buted on December 4, 1985 re,arding the
fecsibility of constr,,cting a recreation
activity center at Silver View Park at a dol-
lar umoi-nt not tr exceed $753,000. The
nnt:..ntixl r.lAn nrnnn<nA h., et.ff wAe A 77 nnO
squere foot shelte: building which wocld
house a natural ice ifena, public restroums,
general seating area, rro shop, kitchen
facilities and concession area. Staff had
met with two representatives from pre-
fabricated buildings; one representing Cedar
Forest Products, and the second representing
Retler Ruilding, a steel structure. Both
representatives indicated that a building
similar to staff's desire could be construct-
ed within the dollar amount allocated.
-2-
.f
There were a number of questions raised by
each of toe in3�.viduals in attendance ranginq
from the need for such a facility as well as
possible programs that might occur at the
facility. Statt elaborated, indicating that
the facility could serve as a year round
facility with the sides coming off, thus
becoming a open air picnic shelter in the
summer time. At this time, an extensive com-
trunity survey had not been completed regard-
ing the demand for the facility other than
informal meetings with representatives from
Lake Region Hockey who indicated they would
he very supportive of such a facility.
Possible programminq activities includerent-
inq the facility out to large community
organizations, exhibits, arts and crafts
shows, community festivals such as Festival
in the Park, band concerts, roller skating,
roller hockey, indoor tennis, induut Iluut
hockey and community fitness areas.
Staff indicated that at this time, he did not
have all the answers but rather was looking
for conceptual approval with additional
detail information to follow as time permit-
ted. Staff further stated Lhat he also had
some hesitance regardinq construction of such
a large facility as no architect had been
consulted at this time and he recommended
that some dollars be allocated for a consul-
tant to review the renderings as they were
prepared by Cedar Forest Products and Butler
Building.
The group provided a strong general concen-
sus to the project and directed staff to con-
tinue getting information on the
Gcnt,KAL PARK
IMPROVEMFNT'S Staff reviewed a list of proposed park
improvements totaling $796,000 and indicated
that it woule. be staffs desire tc reduce
this amount by a minimum of $100,000 so that
the parr referendum would not exceed $1.25
million. There was lengthy discussion on
this issue, with the following items being
cut ur reduced:
A. The auxilliary building at Silver View
Park was reduced to $30,000.
B. Tree and landsrapinq in the amount of
$50,000 was eliminated.
C. Picnic tables were reduced to 70 tables
at a savings of $10,500.
-3-
• U. The security lightinq „n the trail sys-
tem was eliminated at a savings of
$60,000.
E. The VITA trail at City Hall was eliminat-
ed at a cost of $101000.
F. The two multi -purpose courts at Lambert
and Woodcrest Parks were eliminated at a
savings of $10,000.
G. The archery range was eliminated at a
cost of $8,000.
N. The cost for the building structure was
also reduced to $650,000 or a reduction
of S100,000.
Total propcsed reductions are w ,500de a
Staff indicated that they would pro
formal list of items to be considered for
referendum at the December 12 Commission
meeting.
PERMANENT PARK
Staff proposed that a permanent one mill t
MAINTENANCE LEVY
be dedicated for park maintenance to operate
and maintain existing park lands and related
public recreational facilities including the
proposed improvements. Staff indicated that
this would raise an additional $56,000 and
double out existing manpower which consists
of two full-time individuals.
I,. was the concensus of the qroup that this
.wrapped" elogical
intothe ent a park question bf
possible.
rcNERAL DISCUSSION It was the general concensus of the group
referendum should not exceed $1.25
f ianuary 21,
�
million and that a targec ,;arc -
1986 should be agreed upon for the p 1pos
coe
park referendum should the
cur with the task force position.
NEXT MEETING DATE It was agreed that one additional meeting
would be scheduled for Thursday, December 12,
1985 at which Lime we would review the
final
items
figures as well as discuss any updated
regarding the recreation activity facility.
ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 10:20 p.m.
i
R so tfii)y �.Lub itted,
/11 der 'F!eCtor
Parks, Re reat' n and Forestry
c
0-
,�Mro, lk
1
04AVOV& SURA4CE �,1J
-------------------------------------------
i
ft �,•'Nfj AREA
i
Ty1 u� µ, -f
( ffLz,u'5e°
r
f1:a.,;f rlla.
(Ov[Hf'a.5
Nfff3•'4
Y Yel-
vfS5 ♦v
G .�0
afefvw 5WA
Nw tea
mr.mq
q�.
W IVV~
f[w
(Yi Ci
J I 1 f+w
pft f HH
I
•��� �oJ4�-ir? aw��rr
• 0 l 11� V'M• h �..� Y1�1
rr F "M
MEMO TO: Park Funding Alternatives Task Force
Mounds View Park 6 Recreation ommissioners
Mounds View City Councciill
FROM: Bruce K. Anderson, i0 re}}}��-���111LLL!!i
Parks, Recreation and fs r
DATE: December 4, 1985
RE: Park Bond Referendum
To facilitate the task torce's discussion regarding the potential
of a park referendum during the spring of 1986. Staff has made a
number of contacts during the past two weeks and have prepared
the following support data for your review. •;d.viduals that I
have met with include Mr. Ron Langness from Springsted and Assoc-
iates who has prepared three schedules for park referendums
including a $750,000, $1.25 million, and $1.5 million G.O. bonds
series 1986. In addition, i have met with Mr. Robert Klein,
renr-centative from Cedar r,}reat Products, to discuss the feasi-
bility of constructing an enclosed, natural ice rink/community
center and numerous park and recreation directors who are cur-
rently operating a natural ice arena under cover.
In addition, I have prepared the following staff report outlining
some potential funding areas should a referendum be considered.
Please note that the following staff report is broken down into
three areas; the first being construction of a natural ice arena/
community center; phase II being general park improvements; and
phase III being a one mill permanent levy for park maintenance.
COMMUNITY f_ENTF.R/NATURAL ICE ARENA
As staff indicated, I have been meeting with a number of repce-
sertatives in the park and recreation profession as well as
representatives from Lake Region Hockey and manufacturing repre-
sentatives to determine the feasibility of ccnstructing a multi-
purpose vear round rnmmiiri•v o,• ,,,,,y, n potential plan
for the community center building has been enclosed which propos-
es a 33,J00 square foot shelter buiiding which would house a
natural ice arena, public restiooms, oeneral seating, pro shop,
kitchen facilities ana concession area. The facility would be
located at the southern end of the parking lot at Silver View
Park running in a east/west direction.
Staff met with Mr. Robert Klein, a representative from Cedar For-
est Products (see enclosed materials) on Monday afternnnn Pm
review the feasibility of constructing such a facility and we
went through some initial needs analysis and from tha, he will
prepare working drawings within the next w3ek to ten days. At
this time, the proposed structure would consist of 5 inch western
red cedar timbers which would be five part bonded lamenants pro-
viding full protection against moisture, leaks and would also
have superior insulating qualitities.
-2-
The reason staff has, at this time, pursil V,] a wuud et[u�Lurerath-
er than steel or aluminum is from an aesthetic perspective, as
staff envisions the community center r,, be utilized on a year
round basis so as not to he "laheled" etricrly a ice arena acdre
ity. The initial cc:st estimates f.ir the communityeCe
$75U,000 which tend to be on the high side but would include the
following amenities:
1. 33,000 square of unclosed "semi heated" space which would
house a natural ice sheet during the months of November -
March.
1. The building would have the capability ,r havinc "weather
o which
ou
through a hin a/latchclosure sw
attachmentwhe1ebyerho f ciliay:ached
coul
throuq Vd
be utilised for an open air picnic shelter •'urinq the summer
months. Staff has done tome initial mark. t research and has
received vhry favorable comments from large corporations
indicating they would utilize a shelter that could serve 300-
Soo people at a setting. At this time, the only facilities
similar to this are located in the regional parks of the far
western suburbs or one that is located at Minnehaha Park in
Minneapolis, one at Phalen Park or at Como Park in St. Paul.
3. In addition, staff would propose that there be restrooms,
locker room and kitchen facilities which would serve both the
summer picnickers as well as ice arena users.
1. During the months of April and May, the facility would have a
dual purpose, with nits being placed rip fo• a golf practice
area, with two tennis courts being available for general
indoor tennis play.
5. In addition. •left !-t:aL an Died oe set aside for
a community fitness center which would house nautilusequip-
mont which would be made available to the qeneral public on a
yearround oasis.
6. other proaramminq possibilities include community -wide
dances, moving the 'Festival in the Park to Silver View Park,
community -vide pancake breakfast, renting the facility for
dog shows, oz other large service organizations, anv large
indoor exhibit such as arts and crafts shows, commuf,ity
festivals, band concerts, roller skating, roller hockey,
table tennis, indoor basketball, indoor floor hockey, indoor
soccer, fitness expos, skate and ski swaps, winter skating
headquarters for skating on the pond as well as sliding and
cross country ski areas.
-3-
The facility is being designed to allow for the capacity of hav-
ing artificial ice should Lake Region Hockey or the City deter-
mine this is an area that we need to expand into. in addition,
staff feels that this facility will serve as a central community
focus for all activities and will he utilized by not only City
groups, but rented out to the school district, also all large
qroup activities, service organizations and neighboring munici-
palities.
Staff has also met with a gentleman by the name of Del Erickson
who is currently preparing a feasibility study for the City of
Edina which is proposing to construct five enclosed natural ice
arenas, and staff feels that should the City desire to explore
the concept of a multi -purpose community center, that a consult-
ant be retained for an amount not to exceed $3,000 to finalize
and firm up the concept plans of constructing a community center
building. Additional items that staff would like to see included
would be a running track which could be elevated above the arena
for winter use as well as indoor storage facilities for park
maintenance equipment which would increase iur maintenance
efficiency.
GENERAL PARK IMPROVEMENTS
Staff has prepared the following list of park improvements which
have not been listed on a prioritization basis but I am prepared
to provide my professional opinion regardinq each of their
"impact" as well as further explain each of the delineated items.
k. Laulidings and park shelters - We currently have four park
shelter tuildings within the City's park system at Groveland,
Woodcrest, Lambert and HMO w Parks. Staff would propose
the construction of two additional park shelter uuildings.
The first at Silver View Park, which would serve as a head-
quarters for the adult athletic program, outdoor restrooms,
as well as a small mairtenance facility to be located between
the backstops at an estimated cost of $60,000. The second
proposed shelter building would be a large open air picric
shelter located at Greenfield Park as per the park system
plan at a cost or $30,000. Total buildings and/or park shel-
ters g90,000.
B. Trees and general landscaping - The original protection for
trees and qeneral landscaping throughout the City's park sys-
tem was based at $528,900 which were 1980 figures. Staff
would recommend that this amount be reduced by $478,900 or a
total of $50,000. The reason staff recommends such a major
reduction in this area is that our forestry department is
currently planting bare root stock at the rate of approxi-
mately 200 large trees per year for $5,000 - 58,000. With
$50,000 we would be able to do major landscapinq improvements
with the majority of the costs being contracted out to pri-
vate nurserymen. This cost would be broken down and allocat-
ed for each of the park areas.
-4-
C. Picnic and free play - Ctaff would recommend that $30,000 be
allocated for picnic and free play space which would go for
the purchase of picnic tables, barbecue grills and general
site amenities includinq trash barrels and bike racks. This
is difficult catagory to define and is based (in the purchase
of an additional 140 picnic tables at $150 each, 20 new
grills at $200 each, 10 bike racks at $200 each and 5 drink-
ing fountains at $1,000 each.
D. Bike and walking trails - Staff proposes that the original
bike trail system as outlined in the comprehensive parks and
open space plan be retained in its entirety which would
include a total cost for off road trail improvements of
$159,425 for the construction of bike trails which would com-
plete the proposed City bike and walking trail system-
E. Site amenities - Staff would recommend that the parking lot
at Silver View Park be blacktopped at a cost of $80,000 which
would includes concrete curb and gutter. In addition, staff
would recommend that security lightinq he placed in neighbor-
hood parks along the trail system at a cost of $60,U00 and
trash barrels should be purchased in the amount of S4,O00,
for each of the neighborhood parks.
F. Play areas - Staff would recommend that new play areas De
developed at City Hall Park - $25,000, Silver View Park -
$35,000, Hillview Park - $20,000, Woodcrest Park - $10,000,
Lambert Park - $8,000, Oakwood Park - $10,000, Greenfield
Park - $25,000. These figures would entail using a great
deal of our exiting playground cquipmpnt and would be a siz-
able reduction from the proposed level of $491,700 as out-
lined by the consultant. It should also be noted that we
will be using a great deal of in-house labor to telocae our
existing equipment.
G. Softba_l/baseball development - Staff would recommWndhthat
the two softball fields at Silver View Park, along
the
soccer fields, be lit at a cost of $76,225.
H. Tenris courts - Staff would recommend the construction of two
lit tennis courts at Groveland Park at a cost of $50,000.
I. Walking trails - staff would recommend that a VITA trail be
constructed at City Hall Park in the amount of $10,000.
J Multi -purpose courts - Staff would recommend that multi-
purpose courts be constructed at Oakwood, Lambert, andWood-
crest Parks for $20,000 each or $60,000.
chery
K. becconstructted atSGreenfield Park recommend
n
a cost Of$8rrange
000-
L. horseshoe courts be constructed at Greenfield Park rt
Horseshoe pits - Staff would recommend Park at acoof
st
of $500 each or 52,000.
-5-
Total staff proposed improvements .................... $802,650
Less 10 percent for City being the general ........... 80,265
Contractor 8 percent tur engineer ing/c(,nxult,,nt 1,4,212
Bond consultant fee .................................. .10,000
TOTAL STAFF PROPOSAL ................................. $746,597
Please note that these are just the areas that staff feels are
current deficiencies in the park system and I would hope that we
could prioritize them to a list not to exceed $500,000.
PERMANENT PARK MAINTENANCE LEVY
Staff would propose that a one mill levy for park maintenance be
included as part of the referendum as we are currently not able
to maintain our park system; and with the proposed improvements,
we would experience major deficiencies. A one mill levy would
generate approximately $56,000 in 1986 anc would fluctuate each
year thereafter. The question of park maintenance would be list-
ed as follows:
C Shall the City of Mounds View be authorized to increase
its annual tax levy by an amount not to exceed one mill
for the purpose of providing funds to operate and main-
tain parks, park lands and related public recreational
facilities in the City which an additional tax levy, if
approved, shall become a permanent adjustment to the
City's levy limit basis as provided by the Minnesota
Statutes Section 275.502275.56.
Staff would propose that this addit:k:u-; 55£,r00 would be used to
hire two park maintenance laborers under phase B of the union
contract at $7.00 an hour and they would be mainly responsible
for turf maintenance including grass mowing, fertilizatior, a,?ra-
tion, irrigation, rink flooding, rink maintenance, snow removal
and general park development.
.n addition to the hiring of two additional people, it would pro-
vide us with enough working capital for the purchase of necessary
improvements for the City's park system, i.e. additional m)inten..
ance equipment, fertilizing, herbicide control, overseed:ng, and
other generally accepted maintenance tasks as outlined in the
enclosed proposed park maintenance manual prepared by staff.
PARK a RECREATION—9AK'[10ENT SURVST
CITY
POPULATIONJ
PARRS
RECREATION
FORESTRY
CAPITAL
OUTLAY
TOTAL PER
CAPITA
REFERENDu!ti
IN PAST 10 YRS
YRUI.NAM FEE
REVENUES
Arden Htlle
9,075
94,465/10.41
27,800/3.06
16,%0/1.87
41,740/4.60
19.41
None
29,000/3.2
Blaine
32,000
295,000/9.21
110.000/3.44
31,375/.98
60,000/1.88
15.51
'83/495,000
%,000/3..DC
Brooklyn Ctr.
32,000
402,759/12.59
355,407/11.11
none
142.675/4.49
28.19
3 million
545,042/17.
Brooklyn Park
I 50,000
1,387,900/27.76
none
114,000/2.28
30.04
81/6.9 mill.
255.700/5.11
Eden Prairie
24.000
168,800/7.03
210.590/8.77
145,500/6.06
78,800/3.28
25.14
'79/2.5 mill.
115,960/4.83
Fridley
30,000
819,018/26.97+
447,482/14.92
none
121,700/4.06
45.95
1 - failed
9U,000/3.00
Maple Grove
28,861
409,289/14.18
521,752/18.08
none
222,520/7.71
39.97
'81/3 million
234,709/8.13
Maplewood
26,000
439,400/16.90e
350,580/13.48
none
469,700/18.07
48.45
1 - failed
124,130/4.77
Lawmaker Y mw
- 2>t508`
93,824/6
116.040/B.Ss
26,40011.9&
.5i,000/4.21
21.71.
L:Imilmi
J111.00OL4.6
New Brighton
24,C00 449,060/18.70
66,100;2.75
'1,000/2.96
24.41
1967 i
it) 5,000/b.88
New Hope
23.000
T
330,422/14.37
1264, zOZ / 12. 36
24,42)/1.72
44,500/1.93
29.68
None
84,000/3.65
Ply"moucr,
40,000
639,183/15.98
311,5+00.79
177,948/4.45
400,000/100.
128.22 I
3 million
N/A
Roseville
42,000
708,000/16.86
914,D00/21.76
:.one
in budgets
38.62
None
192,DOU/4.57
Shoreview
22.000
391,710/17.81
162,655/7.39
10,500/.48
98,D00/4.45
30.13
'81 - failed
130,300/5.91
•Includes Nature Center Budget
4
1
ACCOUNT
YEAR
ACCOUNT
BUDGET
ACTUAL.
CHANCE
STATUS
1978
Parks
64,234
65,964
Recreation
61,551
61,615
Rec. Activity
30,170
31,736
(743)
Forestry
28,319
21,110
7,116
1979
I
Parks
59,356
63,969
-7.6%
Recreation
69,135
71,826
+13t
Rec. Activity
10,416
38,943
+231
740
(
Forestry
29,196
22,080
+31
9,390
1980
Parks
63,861
64,408
+7.41
Recreation
78,905
84,101
+14%
Rec. Activity
42,942
50,271
+29%
(6,589)
Forestry
33,360
31,649
+15%
11,101
1981
Parks
78,288
80,945
+22.3%
Recreation
93,023
91,857
+18%
Rec. Activity
53,938
52,817 I+51
(5,A88)
Forestry
28,856
25,209
-14%
14,748
1982
Parks
78,451
81,592
----
Recreation
96,750
93,083
+41
Rec. Activit}
67,403
62,020
.181
(20,928)
91,349•
Forestry
23,435
22,479
-22%
15,704
'Includes the purchase price of four used park shelter
buildings 6 29,329.
T-
I
t
ACCOUNT
YEAR
ACCOUNT
BUDGET ACTUAL
CHANCE
STATUS
1983
Parks
89,194
94,990
+14%
Recreation
1U0,082
99,958
+3.51
Rec. Activity
+31.5t
(20,928)
Forestry
21,508
17,733
-101
19,479
i984
Parks
91,810
87,202
+31
Recreation
112,205
114,903
+12.21
Rec. Activity
80,475
89,435
+10t
(20,928)
Forestry
23,207
20,701
+101
21,903
1985
Parks
93,695
+21
Recreation
116,040
+41
Rec. Activity
73,607
94,804-
Forestry
26,403
+13%
1486
Parks
97,001
-40%
Recreation
142,417
+231
Rec. Activity
89,246 112U,000
*•
Pores try
29,431
+12.5t
*As of 9/1./85 "Projected
Parks 51% or 5.661/year over 9 years
Recreation 1161 or 12.81/year over 9 years
Forestry 51 or .551/year over 9 years
Recreation Activity 380% or 42.21/year over 9 years
•
I
r
GATE APPROVED: 12/05/d:
PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL.
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA
Regular Meeting
November 25, 1985
MvuwldS View City Hall
2401 Ilwy. 10, Mounds View, MN 55112
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The Mounds View City Council was called to order by 1. Call to Order
Mayor Linke at 7:00 PM on November 25, 19B5.
The Pleuge of Allegiance was said. 2. Pledge of
Allegiance
MEMBERS PRESENT: Councilmembers Blanchard, Quick, ;. 11011 Call
Hankner, Haake and Mayor Linke.
ALSO PRESENT: Clerk/Administrator Pauley and
Attorney Meyers (arrived at 7:03 PM).
Motion/Second: Blanchard/Quick to approve the 4. Approval of
'ovember 12, 1985 minutes as presented. Minutes:
5 ayes 0 nays November 12, 1985
Motion Carriec
There were no residents requests or comments from 5. Residents
the f.00:. Requests and
Co:mnen:s from
ine riour
Couacilmemher Hankner asked that Items D and E be 6. Approval of
removed from the consent agenda to be read. Consent Agenda
Motion/Second: Hankner/Hawke to approve the
consent agenda, minus Items D and E, and waive the
reading.
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carrieu
Clerk/Administrator Pauley read proposed Resolu-
tion No. 1956.
Motion/Second: Blanchard/flankner to approve Reso-
ution No. 1956, commending Jan Quick for service on
.he Festivities Commission.
S .Ayes 0 nays Motion Carrie,!
Mounds View City Council November 25, 1 W) ,
Regular Meeting Page Two
Clerk/Administrator Pauley read proposed Hesolutiun
No. 1950.
Motion/Second: Quick/flaake to approve Re sul -
t on l:o. 1950, commending Robert Knieff for service
on the Energy Council.
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carries
Clerk/Administrator Pauley explained the intent of 7. 1st Reading of
the proposed amendment to Chapters 100 and 101. Ordinance No. 40J
Motion./Second: Haake/Blanchard to approve the first
reading of Ordinance No. 400, amending the Municipal
Code of Mounds View by amending Chapter 1OU entitled
"Intoxicating Liquors" and ChaEter 101 entit',d,
"Non -Intoxicating Liquor", and waive the reading.
5 ayes 0 nays Marion Carrie,
Clerk/Administrator Pauley explained the parpose of R. 1st Reading of
the proposed amendment to Chapters 100 and 101. Ordinance No. 4U1
Motion/Second: liankner/Haake to approve the first
reading of Ordinance No. 401, amending the Municipal
Code of Mounds View by amending Chapter 100 entitled
"Intoxicating Liquors" and Chapter 101 entitled
"Non -Intoxicating Liquor", and waive the reading.
5 ayer. 0 nays Motion Carried
Counci.member Hanknar explained the necessity cf
the anendment, due tc Insurance premiums for the
liquor establishments.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley explained the intent of S. ist Reading cf
the proposed ordinance. Ordinance No. 392
Motion/Second: Quick/Hankner to approve the first
rea ing of Ordinance No. 392 establishing Chapter
28 of the Municipal Code entitled "Designations of
Fund Balance of the General Fund", and waive the
reading.
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Mayor Linke explained that due to an error in the 10. Public Hearin,:
timing of the public notice being published, the Development D�
public hearing for Development District I1 would �1
have to be rescheduled to December 9, 1985 at
7:05 PM.
Mounds View City Council NuvemL)er 25, 1985page Three
Regular Meeting
--- ---
)tion/Second: Haake/Luick to reschedule the
ub is hearing for Development District 01 to 7:05 PM
on December 9, 1985.
Motion Carried
5 ayes 0 nays
Muttcn 11. Development/Second: Hankner/Blanchard to approve Agreement No.
Development Agreement 085-71 with Electric Equip-
ment Service Corporation for the development of a
10,000 square foot industrial building at 4751
Mustang Drive ana authorize Mayor and Clerk/
Administrator to sign, and waive the reading.
Motion Carried
5 ayes U nays
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reviewed the optio:cs
n of
12. Consideratioegard-
Staff memo R
available to Electric Equipment Service Corpora-
in EESC Sewer
tion to provide sanitary sewer services to their
involved
Charge
9
development. He also reviewed the costs
It was agreed
and methods of assessing that cost.
that Electric Equipment Service Corporation should
pay the cost in full at the time of installation
and then make it their responsibility to remember
hey can be reimbursed if another development comes
hrough and ties in.
Motion/Second: Haake/Blanchard to have the City
requ re , ectr-.c Equipment Service Corporation to
installed
have a 10" sewer line and an 8" water main
be
down the City right of way and for the cost to
be
paid for entirely by EESC, wl" r. notation to
put in the City file that in the future ifaTyone
`o
wants to expand, EESC would be reir.bursed the
future development.
-
5 ayes 0 nays
It was noted that Public Works/Community Develop- 13. Report of
Public works/
ment Director Thatcher was absent due tc family Community Dvlpt.
illness. Director
Attorney Meyers reported h2 had received a letter 14. Report Of
from Mr. Lacey, the attorney for Kunz Oil Company,
requesting that action be taken on their permit
request by the end of the year. He stated that
he had responded as such.
.,ttorney Meyers reported they have served an
amended complaint to the Met Council regarding
the airport issue, and it w,II be going to MAC
within tee next w,
Mounds View City Council November 25, 1985
Regular Meecing Page Four
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Counciimember Blanchard had no report. 15. Reports of
Councilmembe
Councilmember Quick had no report.
Councilmember Hankner had no report.
Councilmember Haake had no report.
Mayor Linke read proposed Resolution. No. 1957.
Motion/Second: Linke/R:anrl,.,rd to approve proposed
Resolution No. 1957, commending Darlene Hartenstuin
for her years of service at Pinewood School, upon
her retirement.
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carriel
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reviewed some of the 16. Report of
activities he has been involved in with the Clerk/Administrate
Youth Services Bureau and passed out brochures on
their programs.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported that Blaine Mayor
Fran Fogerty had passed away over the weekend, and
the City had sent flowers. He reviewed the arrange-
ments for the funeral for those Councilmembers
interested in attending.
Motion/Second: Hankner/Haake to adjourn the meeting 17. Adjournment
at 7:31 PM.
5 ayes 0 nays Motion parried
Respectfully submitted,
Donald F. Pauley
Clerk/Administrator
I