The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAgenda Packets - 1986/02/18fir\ C11'1 OF 1401INDS VIEW 1'I'rY COUNCIL AGENDA SESSION FEDROARY 19, 1986 7.00 P.M. 1. Consideration r st.eit Memorandum Reyardinq the Hiring of Community Service Officer 2. Discussion of ;i It" .Ind Snn•: Park Dodir.-it inn I' 3. Consideration •f Staff Memorandum Regarding Transfer of Ownership of G.„up W Cable 1. Consideration r Start Memorandum Regarding Contingency Plan for Reduction of 1986 State Aids 5. Consideration . I St..11 Memor.,n.A.un Regarding Lnader/ Backhoe 6. Consideration .•f StaIF Memorandum Regardinn Inning land fur ProposuA M•-I.ropp.l ttan 1,.ursil commission P,,rk and Ride 7. Consideration f Staff Memorandum Regardinq 8laine's Comprehensive Land Plan Map B. Consideration •,f Staff Memorandum R,:gardinq Satellite Dish Antennas 9. Consideration o1 Staff Memorandum Regardinq Gale/Yost Addition 10. Consideration "t Stdlf Memorardum Regarding P. Wunrnos Contract 11. Consideration "f Staff Memorandum Regarding Well MI Controls 12. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding Comparahle Worth Study Status �g- 1 I,OCEE[,INGS OF'rHE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF A)UNDS VIEW f RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA Regular Me.1. February 10, Muunds View City i• 2401 Hwy. 10, Mounds View, MN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- The Mounds View City Cc,.ncil was called to oruer by 1. Call t Mayor Linke at 7:00 PM �,n Feb:uary 10, 1486, The Pledge of Allegiar.c. was said, 2. Alllegi .i egi.,nc MEMBERS PRESENT: Count 1Imemb.'rs Quick, Haake, Hankner, J. Null r' Blanchard and Mayor Linke. ALSO PRESENT: Attorney Karne y, Clerk/Administrator Pauley and Public Storks/Community Development Director Thatcher. Motion/Second: ^ Haake/(wick to approve the January 22, 4. Approva' A .986 canvassing board minutes as presented. Minutes: Januar: Januar} 5 ayes u nays = °H Motion Crrr, d Mut io❑/Second: Hankner/Blanchard to approve the January el, 1986 minutes as presented. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion .:,.. r..•d There were no residents requests or comments from 5. RReequdent,-ts ini the floor. Comments fr,n- the Flrr')r Motion/Second: Han.r,ner/haake to approve the consent 6. Aonsentl it le .la dyenda, as presented, and waive the reading of the resolutionS. Motion. 5 ayes 0 nays Mounds View City Council �i �' ,� February i Regular Meeting Page Two ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Clerk/Administrator Pauley reviewed the purpose of 7. Consid. proposed Resolution No. 1974, which speaks against of Rslt. the consolidation of thc Ramsey County Municipal Court 1974 system without further study dnd analysis. Motion/Second: Quick/iiankner to approve Resolution No. 1974, opposing the consolidation of the Ramsey County Municipal Court system without further study and analysis, and waive the reading. 5 ayes 0 niys Clerk/Administrator Pauley explained the purpose of Ordinance 404 is to bring the City into compliance with the provisions of Minnesota law relating to the timelines for filing for candidacy for local office. Motion/Second: Blanchard/Quick to have the sec3nd reading and adoption .f Ordinance No. 404, amending Chapter 4, Section 4.02 of thu Home Rule Charter of the City of Mounds View. L'ouncijmembrr quick - aye Councilmembcr Haake - aye Councilmember Hankner - aye Councilmeml,:r Blanchard - aye Mayor Linke - aye Motioi. ,i 8. Second Rcadinq and Adeptu.� of Ord. No. 40 Motion C. �d Clerk/Administrator Pauiey explained that, per Council's 9. Conside, — I direction, Staff had prepared an ordinance renewing of orainanc_ Ordinance No. 390, exte.,ding the effective date as No. 405 far as State statute allows, which is 18 months. Motion Second: Hankner/Quick to have the first rea ing of Ordinance No. 405, renewing Ordinance No. 390 prohibiting de-elopmentof certain properties on an interim basis. 5 ayes 0 nays Clerk/Administrator Pauley explained that because of the lawsuit the City has going on concerning the Master Plan, Staff wouli recommend that the Council request the Metropolitan Council not approve the MAC's proposed 1986-87 capita'. improvement program until such time as the issues outlined in the City's lawsuit with the Metropolitan Council and MAC are resolved. It was the concensus of the Council to follow staff's recommendation. Motion Carried 10. Consideration of Memo Regar ing MAC's 1986-87 Capit Improvements Program Mounds View City Council i �� y t February 111, 1 Page Three Regular Meeting �! i i •• i ti•i1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -)irector Thatcher explained this had originally been 11. CofnsRBd,r approved by the Council in June 1981, but the appli- 1979 cant failed to file it with tl,e County, and now, due to the time elapsed, approval was again required. He explained the Planning Commission has reviewed it again and recommends approval. He added the applicant has already constructed a single family home on the lot. Motion/Second: Quick/Uir.knrt to approve Resolution N0. 1919, anprtivi;ig th_ minor subdivision for 3030 County Road J, and waiv, the reading. Motion i•.ri i-I'd 5 ayes 0 nays 12. Report of Director Thatcher had r., report' Public Worke/ Community Dvlp Director 13. Report ul Attorney Karney had no report. Attorney i, Quirk had no report. 14. Reports of Councilmcra er Councilmemiors Councilmember Haake had no report. Councilmember hankner Lad no report. Councilmember Blancnard reported she had attended two Firemen's Relief Association meetings recently, and turned the treasurer'-, report over to the Clerk/Administrator. She advised they are having i.nsL,rance problems and may be coming to the City to see about purchasing insurance through the League. motion/Second: Linke/Quick to appoint Peg in Mountas Chairmar, of the Planning Commission for 1986. Motion Grrr 5 ayes 0 nays Mayor Linke reported hnnhad attended the Reg4onal he explained Transit Board meeting Y 7.they are in the process: of doing a study of the northern area and their transit needs, and they will be asking for assistance from the cities to get this survey out to the people. Mounds vieCity Council UN 1r � FJOIJEU Regular Meee ting Page Four Mayor Linke reported he had attended the Pack No. 167 Blue and Cold Banquet, as the guest of Andy O'Connell, r a member of the troop, and thanked Andy for inviting him. Mayor Linke stated Group W will begin broadcasting the Council meetings live on March 10. Clerk/Administrator Pauley had no report. 15. Report u: Clerk/ Administrator Motion/Second: Quirk/Linke to adjourn the meeting at 16. Adjournment 7:22 PM. 5 ayes J nays Motion Car: Respectfully submitted, H aaulev Clerk/Administrator .I MEMO T0: MAYOR, CITY COUNCIL CLERK -ADMINISTRATOR FROM: SGT. SMllil DATE: FEBRUARY 12, 1986 SUBJECT: HIRING OF A COMMUNITY SERVICE OFFICER Jill Stevens applied for the Co munity service Officer (i w) position in the Sprinq of 1983 and was hired for the job on May 2, 1983. She performed extremely well in that position. On June 27, 1984 she submitted a letter requesting a leave of absence due to medical problems which she hoped to resolve. Her ambition at that time was to resolve the medical difficulties and get a letter from her doctor which would approve a return to work status. On November 5, 1985, Mrs. Stevens submitted a letter to us from Neurosurgery Associates which would a'low her, to return as CSO with the limitations that she not lift ver 25 pounds. Lifting 25 pounds is a +ery rare occasion for the CSO and would be assisted by an Officer if the situation arose. This weight llnntatl„n ca .v% no problem In our minds as trip fS0 vahirla is nn longer a pickup truck bat a !--ur door ,.uto„ctr le. Mrs. Stevens is a very honest, hard-working individual and functions extremely well with the public. Mrs. Stevens stated that Fhe has not had a problem with her back for the past Id months and Feels confident that she can perform the duties of CSO without any problems. ';le CSO is a part-time position froei Ilarch through December ah.'. works and average of 20 hours per week, REC"ENDATION: Staff recommends the hiring of Jill Stevens as emmunity ervlce Officer at a starting rate of $5.25 per hou-. TS/mJ, I �..� MEMO Tu: CI.t:RK-NnMINu;TRATOR A14D CITY COUNCIL FROM: Pllti1.l( Wt1RK::'COMMUNI fY IIF.Vf.LOPM t:Nf DIHC�'T �f DATE: FEHRUhRY 5, 1986 SUBJECT: HERBS, AND S0NS PROPERTY AT 2299 COUNTY R0AD 11 Per your requeat, ittachod please find a survey of various charges for LfnA .t vela.{•man[ c-.nduch•d by the "ity in January, 1965. I also asked Torr. Wisttnm, Kraus Anderson, what he sold the Super America site for. He said that he could n..t give that out, but he said he co,ild give me their asking pricy for the lot which is zoned B-2 directly adjacent to the west property line of the Super America site and he could also give me their asking price for the property zoned H-2 directly south of the Super America site. Their re)skina and .90 price is $3.50 per square foot ($152,000 per per square foot ('.170,000 per acre) respectively. I also talked to '(om Martinson, Assistant Community Development Director for the City of Shoreview, about their park dedication f.•,!. He said that the City of Shoreview has recently reduced the park dedication fee for commercial and industrial property to 36 of the value of the land. He said that the lily was in the process of changing the ordinance to 31 instead of the provious 89. If you have anv gw-Stion , please feel free to contact me. SWT/m1s MEMO TO: Clerk-Admini.trator and City Council FROM: Director of Pubtic Works/Community Development / DATE: January 31, !9e5 SUBJECT: SURVEY OF VARIOUS CHARGES FOR LAND DI:VI:i3OPMENT Attached please find a survey conducted by the City of Mounds View of various charges for land development for a cities located in the Metropoiltan Area lincludiny the (':ty of Mounds View). Also attached are two surveys which were con- ducted by the League of Minnesota Municipalities regarding Park Dedication tees and Water Availability Changes. If you have any questions, please contact me at my office. /bc Attachments CITY SURVEY OF VARIOUS Ch,...,.ES FOR LAND DEVELOPMENT JANUARY 31, 1985 -- TAX EXEMPT iSTO DEDICATION FEE WATER AVAILABILITY CHARGE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT NAN CITY POPLUATION PARK FUND (W.A.C.) AL LOAN FEES 10% of the value of the $200 per residential 11 of principal amount Or 12,800 MOUNDS VIEW land 10% of the land connection or $1,60J to $1 million, 1/2% or when subdivided per acre for industrial above Sl million zoned land ..wN RAPIDS 36,50o 5% of the va.ue nt tha Noe 2/10 of ll for the first 2-1/2 million, land or $153 per single I/10 of 12 for 2-:!2 family residential to 10 million LINO LAKES 3,692 10% of the value of the None l land -i'RINC LAKE PARK 6,400 $200 per residential lot $500 per connection IFF::.)LEY 29,f'00 S1,500 per lot (pletted), None $750 per lot split, or $0.23 per square foot for i commercial zoned land None S256 non-refundable Nt.« $RIGXTub 19, 5JU Font filing fee and S2,500 deposit 14.9r, I'd of the value of tt.. N''x• land thlgher density 10-13i) or 52 for commercial/industrial zoned land 12,200 $300 per single family, $300 per connection HASTINGS $100 per bedroom for multiple fsm11V, nr Q" nt the c,l•u .1 try. CITY SUkvt:r of VAk,ANUACHA31ES FOR LAND Ot.vt.,.IINMt:N'r RY 985 PARK DEDIU'A'rUIN FEES FROM I.EAGUE OF MINNESOTA MUNICIPALI'rlEn ORDINANCE MATE OF IpAkK ht:UI1'AlWN trr CITY urUINAWE -- lpn Andover 1961 Blaine 1978 R-1, R-2 lot R-3, R-1 12 M Business 6 5Y Industrial 10% I„ver Grove Hgts. 1983 Residential )lot or 10% Little Canada 1982 1pb of land ' Commercial St NN Shoreview 1984 IUY Vadnaie Hgts. 1982 9 CITY SUNNY OF VAHWUS T HAK:,nS FOR IANn IwvFLtIPMF:MT JANUARY il, 140" WATER AVAILABILITY CHARGES (W.A.C.) FROM LEAGUE: OF MINNEStYfA MUNICIPALITIFS C1TY Oakdale .1 Mendota Nsignts i% i uATE OF ukuINANCE :t-!1TNANt'F 10N T NC (W.A.C.I 1474 Resi& ntidl $200/unit Business i $200/100,000 yallOn" InnustrTal per p-ar 197'r Residential $200/unit Multifamily sot ut resnieu a al (no mention of tndu, trial C.naryes) jt�" _ 3 MEMO rO: MAYOR AND Ci':Y COUNCIL FROM: CLERK-ADMINisrRATOP. DATE: FERRII'.RY 4. 1986 suBi ECT: rRAN., CR uF OWNERSHIP OF GROUP W CARLI Attached please find a memorandum from North Suburban Cable Commission Chairperson Steve Schmidt outlining the issues revolving around the transfer of ownership of the North Suburban Cable system from Group W to the Daniels Group. In his memorandum Chairman Schmidt suggests that the City take two actions which do not require formal action by the City Council. These actions would be: 1. Allow the cable Commission to undertake the required public hearings and investigate the background of the propo,Ld system purchaser in order to ensure compliance with franchise requirements as well as to evaluate the intert of the proposed purchaser as it relates to maintaining the system we currently have. Once theso hearings are completed by the commission, each City will be conducting its own public hearing, however, the detail to which this hearing will go will be significantly less than that of the Cable Commission. 7. Chairpers(n Schmidt SLggCetS that the member cities refer all contact from either Group W, the purchasing cable company, and all public 'Pquiries ti the Cable Commission to ensure accuracy of information and avoid being .iivided by an consertive lobbying effort on the part of Group W or the purchasing company. Staff would strongly recommend concurrence with these two recommendations by the City Council as the purchase of the system is an extremely complex and .ensitive issue requiring far more expertise than is currently available at the City level. DFP/mjs Attachment: & 1 %WO C 1011 Wni A.,— p6"ron K..Ihn. MN ss"l MEMORANU:JM TO: MemDer a tiny, ti,ith Suburban Cable rnmm,.ss_on FROM: Steven Schmidt, Chair, North Suburban Cable Commission DATE: January 27, 1986 RE: Transfer of Ownership of Group W As you have been informed, the North Suburban Cable Commission is making its best effort to stay on top of the transfer of ownership from rapidly moving procedures for the its Group W to a new cable operator. The Commission and closely al,'! professional staff are monitoring the process will keep you informed at every step of the procedures. A question has arisen regarding lice public hearing .necessary , I Lila date-iraticn of the propriety of the transfer of LULownership as required by the franchise. While the Commission will be addressing this issue directly at its FebruaZy meeting on Faoruary 6, 1986, in the Falcon Heights City Hall, it is anticipated that the request of the Commission of its member cities will be to the public permit the Cable cuamiasion to conduct general of hearing regarding all Of the facts and determinations was utilized the transfer of ownership. The process which in the original franchising process (the major public hearing held at tt,e Commission lever witn recommendations procedure to its member cities) seems to be a recommended in this instance. In other words, the Commission would findings hold the general hearing and then Take recommended member es of fact and determinations to its individual individual city council which they each may review at their levels. The cities will be required to hold their own public hearing, but ab in the past, chit, may be a perfunctory the recommenda- public hearing for the purpose of reviewing individual city has any tions of the Commission. If your doing the brunt of the work in objection to the ,'ammission North Suburban Cable Commission /,Ipn Mdl1 44p. M01/611 1.v.a Nl, , ub C.n.C. M... 0,. _ Ns 4qn mn K.,, 0.•, /...•.n, $I /wJeq •• NSCC 1011 M.,, l., Ln,r.• A...... - f.lc.N.-J.u. MN $1W NSCC Member Cities January 27, 11166 Fa'Je 2 this analysis process, pease contact Bootsie Andersen, Cable Television Administrator, as soon as possible. Otherwise, the Commission will proceed to keep you apprised of the progress of the deliberations and proceed to recommend to you a determination after the Commission holds its public hearing on this issue. Because of the sensitivity of a number of issues in this process, and as a result of a Commission holding the major public hearing on this issue, I would recommend that the Cities consider referring all contacts from either Group w or the purchasing cable company. all public inquiries, and any city questions, directly to the Cable Commission. As you retail in the franchising process it was recommended that a lcbbyi4t policv be instituted for the purpose of coordinating all fact-finding at t!.e commission level. That policy generally stated that arythirg worthy of telling an individual city council member or city manager should be told to the entire city council or Cable Commission at a public meeting. In other words, individual contacts with the buyer or with Group w would be limited to that information which can be received in a public meeting either at the Commission or the city council level. A'. though the Commission has not had a chance to meet to recommend such a policy to its recommend member cities, I would recommend that the cities consider limitinq persona'_ contact with Group w or the purchasing cable company at this time and instead refer all such inquiries to the delegated fact -finder, the North Suburban Cable Co.^unission. we look forward to fulfilling our obligation to our member cities in this rapidly moving and difficult process. If you desire any further efforts to be undertaken by the Commission during this process, or have any individual concerns or auesticns which you would like the commission North Suburban Cable Commission I,1.. "Oh Faun w..r.,, 11.se,de. L-1014 r.•+1. M... 4'.." N.. l,1.1 Nvu o.., R. ', ". f, 4.Ib., Nb-a. - NSCC 0.• We , .a,�,. n.. .., l 'I... N.ghn. MN 15u5 NSCC Member Cities January 27, 1986 Page 3 to address directly, please reldr.e those ccncerns and questions to Bootsie Anderson., Cable Administrator for the North Suburban Cable •n.•ommission- Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. If you should have any questions, please feel free to contact either Bootsie or myself. / )1g CC: Bootsie Anderson , Commission Directors E1 North S(-burban Cable Commission A,ph 04101 $01--1 "'1M• ... ...✓. ni. !...I. Ms.n b.n• N.• N.nh 0.1• A.... u. S, Amino-, MEMO TOi MAYOR V1D C 1 1 Y COUNCII. FROM: CLERK-AUMINI�PRATOR DATE: FEBRUAIiY S, 1986 SUBJECT: CONTINGENCY PLAN FOR REDUCTION OF 1986 SLATE AIDS Attached to this memorandum please find a copy of a memorandum from Finance Director Brager dared January 30, 1986 outlining the details of the governor's budget proposal designed to respond to the expected revenue shortfall for the state and an analysis of the Governor's proposals as it relates to the contingency plan approved by the Council in December of 1985. Mr. Brager's memorandum indicates that based upon an Action Alert from the Leaque of Minnesota Cities the City can expect total reductions pursuant to the covernor's proposal in the amount of $63,172. Mr. Brager makes the further point that pursuant to news reports and statements made by leoislative leader it is unlikely that the Legislature will approve the Governor's proposal to reduce school aids and mote than likely make larger reductions in the state budget and local government aids in order to avoid any reductions in school aids. Such a decision could bring the total impact of reduction: to the City to a level nearly equal with the $115,302 level currently contained in the City's contingency plan. Based on those preliminary findings, I have advised department haads that a freeze has he-n placed on all purchases curently contained within the city's contingency plan. I would ask Council's concurrence with this order and approvai of a request that I be authorized to approve modifications to the contingency plan by individual departments where an item currently contained in the plan is replaced by an item contained within that department's budget only which is equal in value. This would allow uepartment heaps to reevaluate their budgets on an on -going basis during the period of time that a decisi^n is nn;nn made by the Legislature with regard to reductions in local government aids thus avoiding a stagnation of the City's efforts to provide the level of services expected by our residents as well is undertaking actions to improve our operations to the overall benefit of the community. RECOMMENDATION: Staff would recommend that Council approve the d:eecttoon-of the Clerk -Administrator to department heads that a freeze is placed on all items currently contained within the contingency plan outlined in the memorandums from Finance Director Brager dated November 26, 1985 and January 30, 1986 and authorize the Clerk -Administrator to approve modifications to the plan whereby a department substitutes an item currently contained within their 1986 budget for an item of equal value contained within the contingency plan. DFP/mjs Attachment: MP.IW TOI Clerk tdmtnivtrator PauleV FROM Pinam Dir.•.*tor-Truasurer Braovr�!/� DATRt •lanu.e 30, 1996 `,(► Res awk. u. tR'S It11DGBT PROPOSAL AND THE CI t f t'0N'I'INt1CN< PLAN t IR REDUCTION Oe 1986 STATE AIDS An Action Alwr t, it•.a tho luapue of Minnesota Ctt 1.,, .1.0.•.1 .L,nuat 23, 1986 indicate!: that the Governor's proposal tut dwaling wit!, a predicted State revenuo shortfall of $720,000,000 in part call for a reduction o! 19s6 Local Government Aid of rlppr"ximatxly 8.01 percent and i reducrion of 8.78 percent in tit., Il.xxeAtedd Credit. The City,-; certified 1986 Local Government Aid is $S15,956. An 8.01 percent reduction would amount to $14,222. 'rhe amount o1 Idea• t.•.nl crudit 111.1t r .•ily will I•' • "' i•. difficult to estimlte. when preparinq General rural Rev.nlue estimates I know that the General Fund property tax levy will equal the sum of a.-rount 3010, Current Ad Valorem 7•rxos p1uA Account 331S, Hom. •tead Credit. The Ramsey County hepartment r,l Property Taxation •alculstss the Homestead Credit for eliyihle properties within the City of Mounds View in January after the property tax levy has been certified to the County for collecton. I rkc..ntly called the Ramsey County Department of Property Taxation -.nd loarned that the General Fund'.-; portion of the Homestead Credit will be $215,831 versus the S2b6,935 which was originally budgeted. This means that the Homestead Credit was iverestimated -Ind the Current Ad Valorr-m Taxe, account was undarestimated by the amount that the Homestewn ad Credit cunts .!was over- estimated. Rememtwr that the ut the s the total 1986 General Fund's share of the ,property tax levy. Taus, a reduction of th.• Homestead Credit ny 8.18 perce,it •1••a15 $18,950. The total reduction of State Aids pursu,"'I r th., Governor's budget proposal ist Local Government Aids $44,122 Homestead Credit Aids 18,950 Total Reductions Par Governor's T6j-172 Budget Proposal The contingency Plan for possible reductions Of 1986 State Aids adopted by the Council and outlined in my November 26j memorandutr provid.•.I for the use of $30,000 of Revenue Sharing allotments to off re,luctions of State Aids. Based upon a Revenue Sharing Recipient Account Statement received January 29, 1985 and taking into account a possible reduction of Revenue Sharing berauso of Gramm-Rudman deficit reduction IegiAlatian, a outlined in a Lea,lue of Minnesota Action Alert dat•1 January 10, 1986, 1 estimate that the amount of Revenue Sharing Punds the city will receive luring 1986 Will Amount to $18,165. This amount is $8,165 •treater than the $30,000 anticip'ttdlat the cim the Contingency pi.tn waA prepared. Accordingly, avail•lhie for po!; hto 't%te All re - '-r1, 111' r January 30, 1986 I Page L $8,165 more than ..is anticipate4. 'fhe ronrinyen / Plan contain, a "Contingency" sl ,uld R„venue Sharing Funds not It., ret-vived. One of those item was the purchase of only one or two squad car budqeted for 1966. At the January 27, 1986 Council muting the purrha•ie of two •:,Piad rots was ❑uthorixed. Thun 118,000 of that $30,000 remains .,. tilahl.• to otlset Posslhle Sta1-• Ail reductions. 1 pr ,pose that the followinq items It" addvd to the City's Cnntingenr Plan until Surh time as the Leiiislature has finalized the amp, it of .,ur Aid reductions for 14116: Item Priority 100-140-47Ui I:leilIons, Equipment $9,uuu D -eliminat.o purchase of ballot counting equipment 100-120-4901 •ldminititration, r.ontingency $4,Uuo F. -reduce operations contingency 100-360-470' Darks, Constnirtion $5,1)110 F -eliminal: construction of outfield fences ..t City Hall Park Add.n,j tic above c-mf I.: the City's Contingency Pl.in mikes $i15,302 availabl• for possible State Aid reductions. Should the Goverm—'s budget proposal and rnrresp-„idinq reductions be imp;omente,l approximately $63,172 of hudget reductions would he necessary. The following items as ouLlined r in the Contingency Plan would have to be implemented: Ilse of all R•venue 6hariog Funos ';38,165 All A Priority reductions 22,147 The tollowin.i B Priority reductions: P 6 R Comoissions recording secretary 840 Graphics -,rd for Iom Personal rnmputor 490 Cable TV -•quipmeot cabinet I,000 New carpeting for Polico Department 570 Total 8 Ptiority reductions 2,86U Total redu,:tions 563,172 A balance of $52,110 remains available in the event of further reductions in Loc.,! Government Aids and/or Homest,•.id Credits payable to the City in 1986. At this time infor.9ation provided by the mows medlt indicates that many legislal.rrs are opposed to the Governor's proposal to reduce School Aid to „,ive the State's revenue sh.irtfalI. Should 1986 School Aids not be reduced it is most likely that th shortfall will be resolved by further red,lcing th,• amnunt of Aid to Cities. January 30, 1986 Page 3 At this point I am cautiously optimistic that the i.,ntrngency Plan which has be,n adopted will enable the City to "weather the storm" of the Star•'s revenue shortfall. Should you have aj.y questions please do not hesitate• to contact me . DB/ds Attachment: Novemb-•r 26, 1985 Memorandum from Findn,e Director to Mayor .ind i nnncil MEMO Tut MAYOR A.•u CI'II CUUNCI I. 1 PNUMI FINANCE I11Nta"IUR-TREASI!REM BRAGER 4 I DATE NOVKXUF,, 26,I40 SUBJECTt CONTING, NCY VIAN FOR POSSIRLE kt:olicriuN it' 14116 STATE A I PIS Recent forecasts by the Minnesota. Department of Finance indicate a very strong tiklihooa that the State of Mtnnosota will experience a budget deficit for the biennium eridiny June 30, 1987 as a result of projected revenue shortfalls. The deficit has be,•n estimated to be between $160 million - $91S. Already Stalrt Ofticials and Legislators ndv,• begun to talk about cuts in the State's budget to make up curse projected deticits. Cuts in aids to local governments has always come up in every dlscussiotis, Then -for.-, Ih,•re is a very strong llklih aid that our '-,Late aids will her cut. On November 8, i905 I attended a forum on Local Government Revenue Stress whl h discussed tt-e state's revenue probl„ms and the effect the, could have on local government. Neill" Johnson, Deputy Connnissinner of Finance; Tom Triplett, Commissioner of Re-anue; and Bill Schreiber, Chairman of the House Tax Committee, were presenters on the State side and Dr. Paul Hasbargen of the University of Minnesota gpoke on the agricultural o,ttlook. As a result of attending that Forum I believe, th,t the City could experience a 10-15 percent reduction of local government aids, or 852,000-699,000. Recalling the "tra„-na' that accomoanied a reductlo-1 In state aids in 1981-19d2 I recommended to the Clerk--Adminlstratc,r and Depatteent Hea•tti that the City take a proactive versus a reactive position reyardlnq possible reductions in local government aids. ' proposed ana they agreed that a contingency plan o,,tltninq possible budget cuts be prepared now to be used In the event of reductions of local government aids. The Clerk-Admirlsr dtor aid Department Heads met -n November 19 and 24, and developed a contingency plan. The plan.. addresses whd we presently believe to be the "worst case scenario"; a 5i IS8(1,000) reduction In local govern- ment aide. We hop that the 'worst case scenario" will not be realized. Thor -tore, the plan is divided into three levels of budget r-.ts: A, B, C. Cuts labelled "A" would be made tirst; if ne, isary cuts lahelled "8" would be next, and cuts labeled '('" wr�uld be made last. A deScrlption of ana the rationale ',,r th.• cuts proposed tollows, MAYOR AND l 1TY CO 'XIL NOVEMBER 26, 19"5 PAGE Two CONTINGENCY PLAN _1•,k PolsIBLE REDUCTION OE1986 ,-IAlt A WS Account Amount Level flu C2mm160/hna 4020 salaries, Pali -time S 84U n - Elimination of II.e Parks and Recreation Commisslnn's recording secret try. Phis is a new posttic,n. Thr, Parks and Recreation Inrectot would rontinue to take mr'Iutoti as he has done in I he past . 4362 conferences $ 250 A 4363 Traininy S 250 A - keductions of 50 of the amounts ortytnally hudy-r o. These aCCOunta Ir,ive hail budget surpluses in the I,•rst. 4303 Professional !.orvrces S4,000 r• - Elmination of the Comprehensive Plan Update. Thl ci,uld be delayed until 191:111. i20 Administration 4011 Overtime, P.eyular S1,263 A 4030 Pensions S 144 A - Elimination of overtime for Administrator's secretary. Recent legislation (November 13, 191d5r regarding the Fair Labor standard's Act (FLSA) allows ,orr.pensatory time off in ;ier: of overtime- 4210 Books and Perjodicals s 200 A - Elimination of m,scellaneous books from this account. 43u3 Professional .?rvic,s 531Ou0 C - Reduction in amounts hudgeted for legal assistance for grievances or arbitration and/or mL:rographics. 4910 Contingency S2'435 A - Elimination of Contingency for cnmmisslnns' exl s created by City council. 150 Finance $ 450 B 4"TEquipment - Elimination ,f p•rrrhase of graphic* card for iRM personal computar. 4011 Overtime, HP-p,lar b `'1i3 A 14AYUR AND CLTI i'IML. IL NOVF:MHER 26, 1985 PAGE THREE 401U Pensions 10 57 A - ki iminat .-vi -F rt um for Accounting r1ork. k,•� .•nl legislatlnn (Nov mbar I t, 14Y5) reyardiny tit,- Y..i- I.d,.r Standard's Act I.SA) .,MOWS compensatory time -A 1 ui lieu of overtime. 190 city Nall 4343 Printing $1,000 A - Reduction as .r i .ult .I Aavinys realized from r,•.•nt award of contra.. for jo intinq of 1986 City new•.1••1for+. 47U] Equipment $1,000 B - Elimination or C ole '1� equipment cabinet. This -,uld be deferred untie 1987. 2U0 Police be artw• it C 1 3 Pro esaionat '••rvi.. S1,soo psychological to tiny tot Police Officers could In i,•tvrrvd until 1987. 47U2 Buildings and itruol.ires $1,2u0 b - New carpeting for pol u•a department could be det-t reo until 1907. 210 ?Ire Deiaclmeu' 6390 Subsidies a9,101 A - Reduction as r ,ult nt sa..,fngs reall2ed from neyntiatfon of new cost allo,ition formula 'or fire department contract. 260 community Devi•IopmentiPub]ic works 4011 Overtime, Req�ilar S1,161 A 4030 Pensions S 189 A - Elimination of u:ertiin-� for Secret.,ry and Enyin., , in,l Technician. Recut ley Iilatinn (November 13, 19SSI regarding the pjir Lab"r Standards Act MSA) allows compensatory tim, Ott In lieu .it overtim-. 270 streets ruction y;,UUO A �705 Const - Elimination of ti,e Lap( it Drive walkway. At th.• pres-•nt t-ise the develol,ment proposal wnich would have necessitated Cho walkway has [teen withdrawn. 4705 construction $10,000 B - Reduction of the 1986 >,trest Maintenance Prugram. MAYOR AND i:l'tY fill -'ll. NOVEMHYR 16, PIHS PAGE YOUR 4705 CnNI I11r1 i'In %111, 1100 - Radart l:>o of I h, 14Rt, : I reef M., in I onaii, , I•t ,yl -. •. 350 Recreation 4010 Salaries;, R,•,, far C I,nnll A 4030 Pensions a t411 A 4050 Workers Comp. S 350 A - P i R Dirertor GIs., I'.at the Aquatics Direct •I p,sition will not he impi nen1. 1 until April, I411I1. 4390 Sub:3tdies $ S00 R - Consolidation u1 proyrams on the rase days coul•I $500 of the 4'081 of the building coordinator at 1 1.1t.w,a) Community Centel. 1313 Printing S 1,000 A - Reduction as a I suit of savings rualized tium t --:it award of contra,! for printing of 1986 City new.lttors. 4703 Equipment S 1,500 H - Elimination .•t •.•rci•;• equlpmt,It for Edgcworxl C mmunIty Center Pool. 360 Parks 4703 Equipment s I,SUU t' - Elio-instion of Iwo dri:iking totintains it two Cit, parks. Total Expenditure t,,eductions 554, 117 Revenue Enhanceme-o : Rwi.anue Sharing S30,uuu A• - Btatf prouoses 1 .at Revenue Sharing sinnies be u.,•d to offset costs •,f the Fire Department Contract. by doing this in ao,lition 1 $30,000 would M• freed .rid would be ava I l al, i tr for .ether purpunes and w, n114 I -uis help to offset I loss ,if state, aids. At this tun•• .,n appropriations t,i I1 t., continue the Revenue Shlri-,1 Program in a Hou•u-Se:I•Ite conference uimmlftee. Total Resource Av.,llabto for Possible :state Aid Reductions S89,11' Should the city a, t receive any Revenue Sharing I, :Nifh and should the 'worst ase s•'enario• regardiny state 11,1% prevail Start prolses ti,.I following addituln.il +•4,,,'inituru reductions: 140 Elections TTUT Equipment S 9,000 - Elimination of 1 ..• pu•• baN Of ballot count I Iy 1pw,•nt. MAYJK AND ('I I Y , I,i ., It. NoVEWWR 21, DIMS PACE t'IVt. l/(l Adminirt11.11 I'll, 4,I= 11 IYIU ('ontTnyen.•Y Reduction of th, ,tpet.r. Isms co-wrtnyency. 16t1 P.ukm t), UUu 1105 Conan uet I In 10 - Eliminate. CnnstI'..tior of so(tha11 field nuttlwl-f 1•n,os at City Hall Pat • . 200 Police $ 12,000 D ifff—e—quMpment - Purchase only on. of Iwo, squat cars budgeted hn 1vMt1. Staft proposes the dbov,• necoM the Cityts Continy"7" Plao fo'pPossiblemk'durt iOn1 11 t 19811S1,-tprAsentaatd tM r ,ant t l Ayen,l.l SeMslgn to �Iscun•. thin plan with y„u a11-1 a,y q,restl-ms you may ..,,ve. DH/m14 u MEMO Tot Clerk-Adrinisttttor and City Council Director ,f Puhlic Works/Community Devel,pmvnt FROM: Public W, rks t'-reman/HuiWing Inspector DATE: February 1, PP 16 suBJECT: THACFOR itWKHnt 'LOADER PURCHASE For your review, tl ori,i-nal Aids will he in a file in the library over th,i w ken,! :hould vnu wish to look at them individually. The City received bid-; for the tractor back hoe/loader. We are pleased to ann., mce that the base price for the bids all fell within the hitotetra! .Amount of $70,000 for the purchase of the piece of eo,,ipment. Attached is a copy of a summary of the bids listimi the mike and model, spec requir--ments, base price, option and price with options. After reviewing ami calling references for the bids, staff I recommend that the low bidder ,)f either JCB Models 1550 B or 1700 H w, ild be our choice of purchase. Due to the price differem es on some of the makes and models bid, we called only tho• - references of the Ford Tractor and JCB. All JCB refeivnces spoke highly of the JCB machinery with the exreption of the fact that during the late 1970's or early 1980's JCh was having difficulties with certain aspects of their tractor. Based on references to date, those problems 30e1- to h.,ve been resolved and no longer exist. The Ford r terenr.ts called basically had no problem with their machinery. Staff would like to note that most of tilt dealers that tl.-! In. %competition stated that the City should not purchase .JCB and that either the Fnrd or Case would he a better porches,-. They also stated that JCB was not stable in the market. They further stated that they would supply us wish references that would state that JCB was a prohlem pier, of a,phipment. To date, none of the dealers have some birth with the so called "bad references". In c,llinq references, we did not find anything that would indicate that JCB is a less than desirable piece of ••quilunent to purchase. It is quite obvious that .JCB, t,einq that they ana manufactured in England and dssemblod in this country, is lust trying to make a foot -hold in the competition against John Deere, Ford, Case and Max;oy-Ferguson in this case. The maintenance mop all had an opportunity to use the JCS at great length be.�au;,' we had a demo for over a month. The majority of the men indt-•ated that the JCB would be their first choice. Als-, if you wete to look at. a JCB pike of I as oppos-d to the others, especially the Ford, the JCB looks to be built stronger (t.e., size of hydraulics and crucial pivic point-t). - 2 - SIIMMAMY purahaniny tract•r is •, lot like purchd!;inq a car inasmuch red as personal rvfarv-w I which ohdid uiCB look lQ-0d,r'hawethe in making a declsi .n. N-t only low bid price, but narlc.rlly was the Maintenance r,,,mo.1('��, Inctallt,e^ithwith thceparlt is a Depdc„•featlatl,•rfirst My Irscu Salon with JCu and 1layden-Murphy availahility' res•ntatives leads me to beleive that Equipment company P more of a problem than service and parts hould not be any that of buYino acy ••ther make or model piece of oquipm®ar please reviev the .•nclos,,d information, andu[feleiki`orwd to discussing this in derail with you if y necessary. ACTIOW NECESSARY staff will prepare the piece of eguipv,,nt the m•cessary resolutions for purchase of that is decided on at the Agenda Session. SAR/bac a gib . •(c nt , I p IA or lit a s S 7 1. T tie it IN :y/ cc, i L fAt qk w.•, .vJ..t,' y5.43 S,1 (. C all i !yy j, �t f '7z 43,8zs,� t �1..,•as �• iH., w.,. i N 5 �� ti• .•11 cpl,wws .11�• J)•'btt-t•wtt-0 i1a1 3il,�l�t �L • �Lk„,tal 4�I�f%) Ht its ICw r+. t� N Nbi.� {)a,a t,w� , .iS NNi•. �'1„e U h• In rr, w, ►M!! i ,1.,-C •� 'h- C, .. YOQPt •;� Mom` JC61NCe s.ttr Ji,d i,. i -A �^ 10939 phuaJeiph,a Road I , 209 whoa Marsh Maryland 21162, U S A letepnone 1301 i 33` 28, Tete. n 7688 ., •r u r sw February 7, 14m, Mr. Harry Long Havden-Nurphy Lyu1N .at Comi.an� 9301 F. Bloomington Freeway Bloomington, MN 55,_0 Dear Mr. Long: RE: City of Moundvi.w It has been breraght to my attention that some question exists concerning the commitment of JCB to the North American market. Let me take chi. oppertuulty to assure you and your prospecrive customers that JCB i, to North America to stay. Our current B Series product is evidence .•t that zommiitment for It is a machine solely de- signed for distribution in North America. The enclosed literotur, highlicilts onr product support programs. As you can see, we at JCB set very high standards for ourselves and our distributors. fa order to maintain those stanuards, .JC8 has recentl, added a :hard parts distriburton tacillty In Riverside, CA. This facility, along with our Vbity Marsh and Burlington operations, enable JCL to consistently proeld, optimum iactory .rapport to our dealers and ulti- mately to the customer. In addition to .he opening of our new facility, expansion of our headquartets in Whit. Marsh is currently uederwav with plans for further expansion in the future. Midis expansion is required for additonal personnel needed to maintain the JCB product support standards. In summery, he isaured that the current JCB product support pro- grams and operation expansions solidly illustrate the JCB constituent to North America. 1„, are very confident that our commitment, along with our utrong distributor, like Hayden -Murphy, will place JCB as the market leader in Nornn Ameri,:a. Respectfully, JC Inc. Spbart Y. Lesher District Service Man. ter cc: ferry Doolev MICha+l 141. i,. �M!'J im INC. 10939P1WoeWtdRoa. Wx20a VrhdeM&S1 M,rvLand21162 USA • TukAtNm 1jo11.1J5 . ,J0 1.,,. . e7688 Mr. Frank Qonerty, ereside,it FQulpm.nt covany 9301 E. 81o0mirVton :rnway Minneapolls, Minnesota 5542b Lear Mr. Ounerty: X8 is pleased to announce the opening of a west Coast facility located in Riverside some 41 miles east of Los Angeles. Its primary function will be parts distribution, >ffective October 21, 1965. tour dealership will low nave the option of placing emergency fEP01 Darts orders for bacrnoe loader and loadall oroducts from this operation providing uoth you and JC8 end users ieprovea service. Your emergency orders can de placed up to 4:00 P.N. (Pacific Standard Time) and subject to avoildollity will be snippeu the same day. Norman Kortus, Parts and Service Manager, will oe heading up the • manageMant team, assisted by Brenda King, Parts Supervisor, and will make every effort to ensure you receive quellty product support. The address of Cie distribution center is: 4124 Tigris way Riverside, California 92503 Telepnone: 7141735-770' Telex: W784 (Answeroack - X8UTI Ron t,ararus, our Supply Mandyer, will cve furwdruiiig foil details of the machine supply situacior. from Los Angeles due to De introduced in trio very near future. This investment Dy Jc6 on the west Ccast should firmly establish XB in this or" ark, further confirm our coma tment to the marketplace. Sincerely yours, Jb' nn Patterson Vice President - Service • Ports, Service artd M,-,ufacaring cc: J. Ostergren R. Anderson B. Thomas Product SuPPort from JCB .. . Easy as 1n2.3. 7 ... the cuniplexlty UI IUddy s LW '•Pw 1•-iI & Iltllvf,.lis hanong Industry the lest lhaxJ you IKWd hlw IC worry IUDUI 6 the lox k up sunlw Of Veto 'Imp1e•nl and e5 1iact.j dlure, JCB sborlgty believes I! nulxl•, IIII'. to - 64juiplit, .! In Trip wUU YAp1A•Ix54 uu„ ♦x,,.,�-,•J ... _- 11:Kvirehled slell-. 10 enAlle yla. ul , ly In+ rtcp KWilny— Ixeh sr Its 1llodln 1 .11 ,lw,'. "1-2-Y Parts Support JCB's 1 2-3 Pans support coves dk .I.d 116 1,x t , ,Old In WM Am xa and Is avallatile ill o extra • 051 1. in ►ft AveylWy if the p l you ner!n Is not to stork at ad[ dealelshtp JCti .n.k5 hur �Ip With I 98%—oll the Shelf avaliuhlhly n1S IrKlUUc5 "'IS for dll machines ever manufallu n by JC8 2. Sam pay iAapalen rill Emergency Puts Ordl For the part that yowl JCB Dealt play Ito' Ild.le In stock there Is me JCB SDD lifts SuPwY Program All omergenry or weakdown parts ordered before 4 00 p m IE S I i are dlsn Itched the same day from JCb S Llnlletl .)aleS w �.anaorah Depoto it the meth00 of smpme,1 requested Is aro,idL'v 3. VkHour Emergency Parts 3uarantaa• Mel, you buy and register ! new JC9 men ^Inelo: adder protection we will gualanter .n„ vallaNI-it Mfough your dealer yl In 48 hoers aI 1 part Ile NO t•ol nave ,r, Sldtk Ina! renders the I e hone In0erahve II we Lan not meet this deddlmt lhrou�n our par hclpanng dealers —The part will :w Suppuetl tree Of Charge and JCB will pick op Ihn helghl co,l More for yyour money. Everytime. 1.2.3" Warranty JCB S t ? J Warranty covers all Lunenl backhto wader and Wadall model' in., gueranleed prole' his also been extenoeu 1, yuu .d nu e0 4 char- Year 1. Standard warranty .r. uumned In the JCI YON2• Powelpmn w,uleldy tuceling the follow,' major component. • Engine • Drive SUITS • lufqut• Converlel • DdlerennalS • Cezrow • Drive Axles • forward NeverSe Shuttle Year 3. W'u"olly eµflw,l 1,1,116111111. weld or qbn, fddWe on mldlll homes ladder drm5 balphlle booms SldnodfC dippers and Loddall booms Utldllly Is an integral part ul Inc design and nw' lure of all JCB products Mecls in materials ane workmanship are exlrenlely are Howevef should r. nelect become appal L41i ""C' eeterr,ncC v:^h,n the d 2 3 Warranty period 1CH mLo is Dealer will Ior replace it at no CAST to you The ,dew JCB 1'2 3 WBrulay ano Pans Support or'' ine most comprehensive In the inoustry today Asp ;umpete details from your JCB Dealer 1CHINC IOQ,'I 011,6040xi Rhaf 110N IA,•M MI• 211621:10113T, 2NO 1CB E,nd,>rn I la 11'1, A,,;l I,,-' l nx Iol, I IwlO LlL SN9 ill& a71 •n41 a gifoi 016 - Sepal". Nano To: Clerk -Ad, nisr, ,tor an,t ('1ry Council FROM Director ,f Public W,,rks/community Devel�qu,enr /v DArEI Yebru,iry i i, 19116 SUBJECT: ZONING Pt -'PERT) BOUNDED ON THE NORTH BY COUNTY ROAD H ON Tlilt E.lr;T BY 1 -35W AND ON THF. RO(ITH AND NEsT BY HIGHWAY 1.) Attached pl.,ase fi,,l Planning romnission Resolution nn. 153-85. rn._ Metrnpnlit.— Tomsit rnaimissinn is proposing ro install a park and ride facility un the sublect property. The proposed site for the park .md rids facility is not in a wetland or flood plain znne. The Lind is not zoned at the present time. It was probably not z..,ntd bwee ieder.,l and state governments do not need to abide by local zonino laws, but they usually do. The land is owned by ti,., Ninnesota Department of Transportation. The Planninq rommi join has ravlrwed this sit-, and focommends a public facilities (i'F) zoninq for this property. A park and ride facility can be contructed under the PF zoning. If you hav-, any qu—tionr., please contact inn. SWT/bac M:BINDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION RE,,oLUTION NO. 153-85 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION RFcOMMF,NDING ZONING PROPERTY BOUNDED ON THE NORTH BY COUNTIROAD H, ON THE FAST BY INTF.RF.STATF. 35W, AND ON THi. SOUTH AND Wf;5r BY SPATE HIGHWAY 10 WHEREAS, thi•; land is within the City limits of Mounds View; and WHEREAS, this land was not reviewed by the City's Comprehensive Land fl•se Plan.; and WHEREAS, this land is not zoned; and WHEREAS, staff has received requests from the Minnesota Department of Transportation, Metropolitan Transit Commission and some developers for the zoning on this property; and WHEREAS, Federal and State governments do not need to abide by local zoning laws, but usually do; and , WHEREAS, Ric., Creek flows through this site; and WHEREAS, Ric.. Creek is a regional and metropolitan- wide recreational resour,,e; and WHEPEAS, the Metropolitan Council anal/or Ramsey County have proposed paths for walk:rq and/or biking in the area; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission recommends to the City Council that this property be zoned as a public facilities district (PF); BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning Commission direct staff to forward this resolution to the City Council prior to approval of the minutes. Adopted the Sth day of rebruary, 1986. ATTEST: Chairman (SEAL) Director of Public Works/ J Community Deveopment MEMO rut Clerk-Adl: iinl,,For and City Counrul ifVROM I Ili re,,Il r I pnf.1 is Nort't/rnimmunity D.•vol 'I"" nt DATF:I February 1, I4116 SUB.Ir,CTt VI1'y .IF t'. \INt"• CDMPNF.NENSIVt: PLAN - kfS'i' ION TO FUI'llkl I.' .It 11l.1 MAP As you may recall, .. . r.•., ,wed tilt. City of nl.ttne', ,•r iSion to IFu•ure land use in .:Iv''•h. r, 1985. They have made •h.IaP revisions and request our com:,ent Attached please fit .: that follow"(1: 1. Prellminfry Iature land us,� plan revised January, 1986. 2. Memo from r:'V of Maine's Department -)f ruwnunitV revel„pm,•nt Itoo tanuary 22, 1986. 3, rity of Itla, •''S hmission to the Metropoli'+n council. 1. 'rhe city of 'hound,. View's Ikr.•mber 5, 1985, I •t n•r to Mr. Joe Grillo, 'Ommurity Dev''u"pmont Director, City .,f Blaine. Staff and the Plan .nq c,.:amission have reviewed the revisions. The City Of Blaine has not adequately addressed our concerns Per our December 5, 191",, letter to Blaine. 1 reconmend thatth, City I lelalnesimilar anl toetrc,ou polltancouncil. 1985, letter to SY,T/bar L`ucemi�ar S, ! 4tl� Mr. J(w. Gri Ito Community Development DireCtor City of Nlaim• Y1So Central Avenue N•Y.• Blaine, MN 554)4 i ounds V'Q� ryN NM Rg; C,rprehensiv, Pl,n - Land Ilse ChaP1,-LiIUU ReviRion 'ro r9M ,•atur.• Land its" Map I Uear Mr. Grillo: The Mnunds Vu•w pi inn:rnl G)mmi vfonnd rCity t",i)1 tl halve reviewed the subp,,'t mar erial 1 You Movesiber IS, 1W. W. twileve that Itw adv,-rse impoets of the. propos'"I Anoka County -Blaine Allport expansion .,n the re•4idential areas you propose north and e,tit Of the airport should tie given turth.r, carotin .',msui,•ration by the City of Nlatne• The low density t-'sident 1a1 (LDR) and' medium density residential 1MDRI areas .ie4r the airpor'. wlli tx• u.t,ier airpline flight y,ths b•,sed upon the ultimat„e11"" lPtant called for in the Maat tlplravartrbyetheythe Motropolitan Air)x,rts Crimmi+si�� • PP Council. In additinn, the MDR ar-a,3 directly adp,cent to the north border of Hounds ':iew m.,y have ein adverse impact „n the istinq Rtnyle-t.uatly residential areas in Mounds View - ex l❑ particular, t,h• Ar,w y,mr attention to the MDR area )list north if VSth Ave•we NJ-, east of Hi8 dirR titfeet, 4nd sourh of proposed Highway 61U which is directly across County Road .l tr,.111 stn'Jle-family haves. Ne wield ,sk that you review your plopos,il for this area and yive consideration to the t'u'reCttg It might hay.• upon sln•lle' tamily residence:; in y• Mk. .". GNILLO DCceft"BR 9, 19dS PAGE Two We would enc.ouray the City of klainti Lit ytve var.•tul consi- deration to the lit gmmi-o .tNVeloopment at the airli..rl is w1, fuel this duvuioix, at will have s mapir unp.irt up.ri your community anti any deci-i.ans you slake reyardiny land use in the aroa of tho .nrlo.irt -ihnuld Ix- b.tytvt np..n the d.-Volopm-nt called for in the Nasl.•r Plan. Should you havo .c.y questions reyardi,.I any .of our comme;its, ploase dii not hesitate to call cierk-ndminiatrator Donald Paul.•y .or Public ktorks/Community I>'velopment Dirt-, for St. -von 'I'hileiwr at Mounds View City u.oll. Hinverely, cury OF MWINDS V'w Jerry k#e� . Mayor JL/sljs � /! ^� 'wICl N•r...AV, 'v,i NI I�A,W ryV .'w . ., rq r.11 )r. To: Chty Manw,er, County Aawinistr+tor, Planning Director, or Appropriate Govt uu,&ntal Otttcrr ►fobs: City of tinine Deyaftc._rt of C�wu.unity Derelopalent Re: Comprchtr...tve Plan - Lino USE Crsyter Revrs:on ro Future Land Use Plan Map Date: January ::, ISiir. The City of Bloine is forwarotng, for }cur L.gcr,cy's forcal Llview, the City of Blame's pLceuseo F.tury Lan:, Use clan tiny. Tnisan-ap will s pplin1980 to kie revi- year ous Future Lana Use y 2000, aaopteo in Noveam er, 1982. The City of Blarne IS reque:tiny your aycncy review the t'ncl05ea map within t:.e next 10 Days ano forw•aro any ccc.;;,ent: wt.icn yo-L agency ceer,s necessary anc arelcionatt. The Bla3r.e City Council has given tre yroposeo Futurc Lana Use Plin Rap tirtt reaaing on January 2, 1966. Tne plan will now De suDmittea to tae lietropciith', Coun,tl ror a 60 oav review perioa. Pl...ae oc aware that the proposea Future Lend Use F,j�n Mep, as en- closes, r,,.es contain several lane aesryi,atron ch.:nyts from ti,t Graft sent to your agency on Noven:Der 15, 1985. Tie City requesr.s any cc:c.,urts fres, your agen- cy rn wr.ti.;q or in person if pcsstD:e In oLQet to Lncluue s-ch com;,.ents into the yuDlic recora. If your <.gcncy shoule nave any yuesticns :egaroing the Future La.0 use Plan Map, plefe.e contact tr_ Coa •an;t; DevelcyP aert '_rector, Joe Crillo, at 784- 6700. IL you snoulC require 3001tional copies cf the propcsec ;len ..ap, please ir.etcatt as Lcer as Wo:s:- vie. JG: dam TWAP LCTTBRI M :: T R C? O L I T A N C O U N G I 300 Met:.) Square Building, St. Paul, Minn.r55101 INrORMATION SUBMISSION CCPT 0.ENENS IVE VAN AME NOME NTS This wcrlcshett :s: ce f:.i*d out and submitted to the 'ietzopcL•t..' Council witn a cop, ai edcn pruposed ctxmpterens.co plate The purpose of this wor-isnett is to summarize the proposed change that trio Metropolitan Council will have enough information scout contemplated plan amendments to determine whether tie Council has interest in reviewing the amendment in more detail. ?leas• be as specific as possible; attach additional explanatory materials if necessary. I. GEVERAI, DUCkM1nTION A. Sponsoring governmental unit Cit. of 61a: e. linne•cta same of loom contact person Joe Grillo, Comm. Bevel. Director Address 9)i CeuTr l Avenue .L, Blaine. 'linnesot i 554A Telephone '64-r--o B. Attach a cop; of the proposed amendment,- including a S&P shwing the location of the proposed change, the current plan S&P, and the proposed plan sap. Indicate wheat sections) of the original plan is Lace) being amended. See Mip• ?1, '_, 6 63, 1 C. what :s the cfflc: al local status of tat proposed amendment? (l'heCK one cr more as appropriate.) X Acted upon by plannirg Commission C.f cppiicacle) on _. Approved oy covernin9 body', contingent upon metropolitan Council :*view, on Jan :, 1986 (1st RAQ oil to adopt) Considered out hot approved by governzne tidy on Other 0. Summorizo the reasons for the proposed amendment. See Exhibit °.. L. Provide a list of all local units and all jurisdictions af:ec!ec oy the finance (sctaol districts, watars.`.ed d:stucts, etc., ttat have been sent Copt" of this worUheet and plan amendment anc the dates ccpia were sent to thes. 1st Mailing s it St —Laver 15, 085 (map only) 2nd mailing ,.:it ianuur).10, 19Co Leap and %orishc,t Please see it.,ched 1.0abit 03 for a list of .111 lo,.,l units and all nuri•ditt:-is sent materials. II. LmD USE A. Cescr.be the fo.:a.in9, as apprcpc:ate; o S�:e of _aa ... aeces ;., a. ;rcnrr•rn� .f any a: rca f o Preposec type > 1 of land use Sec• Lxhibit 1 Jua 'laps o Numce: c-: res.icntlal dwelLng units 1.) - c Proposec density 5,; o Proposed syua:e footage et ccmmerc:e-- -a=•_-' 3. Pcou-airon,cuszc _.d and =w:moment Fc:ecasts mould You ezpeet :re Xopcsed amercment b :esu:t crar.9es the population, :cusanold or emoloymen.=ececasts roc 1990, - tor t.je !:v. year stages contained :n cre cr.;:nal Dian, fc: :ane parce'_s aftec:ed by c:a eange? NO !;P11Ca3:a. _ Yea/NOt site. :f yes cc not sure, snow ce- = t:.e a ?ec changes: Forecast Basco or. Fececas: Based on P:ev:oua ?.an ?:an A. er=ltnt Year Pc^ Es9. ^x>D:. ?ct•. °so :590 : ntn r as; Stages �o 19 C. ^�angas? 'ice= —d°d °tic:x et L`r:an v Serice - :-e xcrda:.as tca -rC�Csed asendmeMt result If: Of the eracreceot tneauaoaOr to tee are ng and srag:ng of deve'_cpa x NC/Nce .;pliczoie. Yes. Be sure 5lCtlon : contains a map cf trese changes. meesu.c-ents cf the land area :nvoijed, arc ces:gr.ac:on now t=.n9 anc stag, n9- The propos, land ',cc Plan 'lip ,.ill ulcrmately aff,:4 the land supl: considerati.•ns for the upcoming )ear :OUU'IUSA Lin,•. 11cuever, the proposed &,n shoula not affc:t Or )'car lvlu WSA I;ne; nur is a chuoge rey„• .ted. D. Housing will tnis cn.,nge have an effect on the community,s ability r intent to ac..eve the long-term goals for low -and moderate and modest -coat noosing oppoctonitleg contaihed in the or pi an? NOINOt a;'?1lCacie. Yes. De,-crite effect III. INPI.EMENTAT!_N PRCGRAM A. Official Controls Will the prc?osed amendment require a cnange to zoning, subdivision, Cr on -site sewer ordinances' NO. Yes. Please describe. i5ee Exhibit •4. B. Capital ilmr='cement Program Will the prc.posed amendment require a cnange to the CIP? NO. 1$Ci .iirauuu Lu11C111 i9b$-89 Cp`1 Yes. Please describe. IV. SJZM Y OF r_NDI.vw AND CCNCLOSTONS ICptional) You may add ecara,nts sating your conrlusiors about the effects cf the proposed amendment on metropolitan plans. Check the statements that apply. A metrCp_iita❑ system is potentially affected oy one proposed amendment out the proposed chance is minor or inconsequential. A review period of less than 90 days : appropriate. A metropolitan system is potentially affected by the proposed amendment, and a 90-day review should take place. Nc m_ _ of:tah system " ;otentially affected by the proposed amendment. No metropolitan system is ,potentially affected by the proposed amendment and waiver of Council ccmmen.t and re-E - is recorr. ended. Other: 03.OS.d1 SP5642 �4ILi� (gropoaed F W Suma, ry o urraot Land U ea i.cnr t 1 o:n Aa Aaricult6 R Rural SF Sir.6le Farm (No Comparis n Mid Deasi MF Multi -Fan KH Knolls flume ' (No Comparis C Cocuercla (xo Coupariso LI Lect ao (No Coa,.arls hl heavy Ina P Para Publ CP Proposed Np Proposed (No comparison (No comparis • No deeiedatioe uture Leta Use Plan Map/Descri,,tioo of Term currout and proposed/soolna impl•mectaticD. f compariouos tetreeD owd Lend Use P1eQ Zcn'r��t se Plan G51 lgleeotrtioo a D,b 0 on i Rirpc: t N/ A R ;�ura1 FesideotI:. Ae, FR, RE e ,y Rural Nesidentlai y, FR, RE ly Nea Lih w>+ Dersity Resioectial R-1, h-2 p-1 wIth PUD h!' Eesidettiai Flex on) ,LL n Hio D:rsity hesiou-tld: R-da, 1-3t ty Nrs h•D c:r. NiCn Density Reaidettial h-3c lY Nea Yarn NoDile dome ReaiDeot]ai,.- h-4 u,,.nnrrood Commercial b-1 oD b-2, B-3. D4 CC Co,ayucity Commercial 1 PC (to be dewelopa ) o) PC Planed Coercial Planmm LI Lle Dt ir,austrial u:tria: PI (to be dewelopec) P/ P:armed Isdustnal DI 1.. heavy 'nduetritl 1-2 Y aLr]:a • CuD11c A Semi Puoilc C 1c Open space Comm Para a Public t Seal PuDIlD C (jpeo Space C N,rt Para a PUDi1C A Seai Public Dpet Space C e Publ1c t Semi Putllc C 00) a Conservancy Pare 2 (11) Definitions of Pr"-osed Terms A A}r ort Property owned and controlled Dy KAC and reeogDite- .1 tee AviatIoD Chapter of the DevelopnaOt Guide. Tbc:� 1s no zonine implementation. rewired. R Rural Res3d9Ltiai Land designation to fo3ter rural residemtial llfest,., Dy permitting strictly agriculture hcce3teads, M,*.e: lurma and rlo DDy fare DULtliLtleYa, o.d tla UtG w:j •D ntmesteads with adequate einimun acreage to subtair, appropriate private well wrier and sewer septic syite:. mreting VPC-40 regulations. Lots sizes would raty,c fror. 1 household per 2.5 acres to 1 household per acres. Zoning impolementatioD can Occur by the following: (Ag) Lt,riculture; (Fh) Farm Resident.. ado (RE) hesldectlal Estate. p& ow Density jet.cei.�,a Land designation to foster urbanized residential lifestyle by permitting single far.ily, reswential oevelopment of up to 5 dwelling units per acre. TLt , areas would be served by City water and sewer syatt_s designed ano owned oy the City ane found acceptaelt �. Minnesota Department of nealtb ar.d MYCC. Zoning iLplementation can occur by the following: (8-1) Single Family Residential and (F.-2) Two Family Residential. RP Residential Flea Lard designation to foster urbatizeo residential lifestyle similar to LDR with the option to do deL_::. transfer and/or density increase to enhance the development but preserve valuaole natural resources. Zoning laplemeetation can occur by the following: lR- 1) Single Family Residential wits a PULP overlay district. MDR Mid Density he., ae: :AJ Land designation to foster urDanized resideotial lifestyle by permitting residential development Of bttweeD 5 to 10 dwelling units per were. These arts-' would be served by City water and sewer systems. Zoning implecentation can occur Dj tte following: (h- 3a) Multi Family Low Density; (P-30 Multi Family Medium Density. R )ji�h Density Land designation to foster urbar.ized residential lifestyle by psrsdttiae r031deotial development beat _ 1C to 20 dwelling units per acre. These areas woe.. served by City water and sewer slcttn. Zoning itplsL,"tation can occur by the Eiah Density Multi Family- Page 3 MMR MOb1l• Hoae nesiQ"otijij Laud designation to provide urbanized residsotial lifestyle by persittiCg mobile home developwot Of oetween 5 to 10 dwelling units per acre. These art -a would be served by either City services or by a pr:,&: sewer/wtt_ systw. Zoning U*IeeebtatiOC Cab OOCwr :; the following: (11-4) Mobile bo". CN Lei►tLt,,L oe Ccc.WcLt._� Land desiamtlon to provide so.al. cuLmerclal developeent of 1 to 2 acres in size to provide Convenience shopping for seversl Oeighbrboods wit: ..r. . jreb ,rtq j pw Roved b. City water and sewer systems- Zunina iaP14MCtat". can occur ty the following: (B-1) Neighborhood Business. CC Losm.ucl_y__-Cot.Ltrc,al Land designation to provide Cos.auoity and reeioda. commercial development of 5 plus acres in size to provide retaii/eeneral cossereia: 3hoppiCe for one ..r Lore cosaunities. This area would be served by Ci., water add sewer systees. Zoning iepleseCtatiOC caL occur by the following: (B-2) Cooeumity Comwrcia.; (P-3) Regional Shopping; (B-4) office -Research Pare PC Planned Conterclai Land designation to provide a pianned commercial etviroosent which is eeoerally bisnway-oriented an: designed to service one or sore communities. This u.> would be served by Lity water sou sewer systeda. Zuning lspiementatioo can occur by the following: ire Planned Commercial. L1A4t Industrial Land designation to provide industrial land which promotes light manufacturing and warebousiCll with o Linimur. development size of 1 acre or sore This a:e•, would be served by either Ciiy services or private systess acceptable to WPC-40 regulations and the District Fire Cbicf. Zoning isnlementatioo can cct.r by the following: (I-1) Litbt Industrial. l&nr,d industrial PI P armed Industrial LaeLv roomentawhich tisprovide a p seeerallybigbway-crleeted u.c dtslgoed to service larger industrial users with a Liniaum development size of 5 acres or more. This ar, A wuuid oe served by City water and sewer system. Zoning implemeotatl= can Occur by the following: iFI) Planned Industrial Parg. ?"a 4 j�jfSevv_ n r j Land designation tc provide industrial land which , prurotas heavy cwwfact urinb/warenuusing and truca...e With a ad.nirrua developsent of 1 acre in site or sort. Me area would he Serviced by tither City aorvioeb c, private system acceptable to OC-40 regulatlonS &a. tie District Fire Chief. Ionic iaplewotatioh car. occur by tbt followic: (I-2) Heavy Industrial. Puoac/Sear f6t is Land designation to set aside public and Sa=-pubL. Oren Space open space within the comaunity to ,provide for adeq.a"e --1n napY- ane ne�r•.�•p ^.:v,•,. pp�r ,nlnr .y.rrT.. Zoning izpleaactation can occur by the following: (C Conservancy. Puoac/StW Public Land d*&Unatloe to set aside and maiotain public a:.c semi public operational facilities Such as city ha..s ice arenas, and churches. Zonis iapleseetatioo car. occur by the followin&: (C) Conservancy. Conservancy Land designation to set aside and maintain anvironaantally sensitive area& such as Class 3, L, wetlands and ajar county ditches. Zoning implexectatioe can occur by the following: (C) Conservancy. . 9 EXNIb1T 2 I, (D) Fs&sohs for U.a proposed ameudract The City'a review .ud r.0 ovals forthe th precipitated "Ltter.ts to the current LAI.a Cie Plan map City Couucil's desus to: AJ appropr••tely tuide growth in the C1ty's unotielu;ed altos - especially in Sanitary Serer Districts 6 and T; 6) review tle C1ty'a need co balance urban and rural develOFI�Ot and life styles; uI see lVll•.: rr.-_ .__ ......._.��. �.� n« used LL balaoce variety of land use interests which oftac c(sflict with eacb ctbeerr and strategy for consist,nt urtard rural d residential, eoc•merolal, and industrial propertY owners; D) provide Input to the hetropolitan Council as part of its n,-w MDIF Guide wrien includes the year 2000 HU:� Line to benefit the City of bl&iLe to the saxiLuc extent possidie; E) recoertizc the work/redntitendationa perforued Py the hetl.cPolitae Council's LPA staff wtiob conducted a pilot study to determine appropriate land use alternative& in Sanitary Sewer Districts 6 and T. ' As such, tbt rrdh -�d r�etdments to the current Laud u-t Plar• Hap can be 367J4ar1zed in the followir:t _srrer: 1) 31bnifitact enlarb&meet of rural residential lino ,at asio,/de3ibn8tloc; p) sitnificant redudtlon of industrial land set aslde/designatiun; 3) 3 ,4, recobnt, 5 o of wetiandsandnu4joraCountyon Of ylass ditch 3 system; 4) retocusiLt the 1-35W corridor towards alttroat.ve plan designations (planned industrial and plu•ned cooLerclal); 5) reaffirL_tion of non-residential land uses adjacact to toe airport where possiblt; in particular, land use desienations at the aid Of the Doric./scuts and east/west runways. 6, realibnL(..nt of . majority of industrial land use away fr" T665.te and 1) hibp del.sity housing lia,o uses/oppoctuei ties. JG:an TNM.AP EYHIBIT2 kove�uer i5, i995 �•-il.. L u.^- jzi,,usry 22, 1966 aaiiins Jay McLkr,dec Bonnie Torps Eueane Hickok A Assoc. County Adeinistrator Anoka County 545 Indian Mound 325 Main Street Wayzata, MN 55391 Anoka �3: 55303 Margaret Tnorpa Harold Israelson Ramsey County Israelson A Assoc., loc. Rom 316 Coon Creek Watershed, Suite 110 nine W Riooearu.tun Freeway StPaulMN 55'.02 Bloomington MN 55431 Carl Ohrn Bernard Barrington, Dir of kilt Comp Plan Div Director Metropolitan Waste Control Coca Metropolitan Council 350 Metro Square Building 300 Metro Square Bldg 7th she Robert Streets St Paul MN 55101 St Paul MN 55,01 bob mazanec Wm Crawford, Engineer Comprehensive Flanr,i4 P•nDOT - District 5 Metropolitan Council 2055 North Lilac Drive 7th and Robert Streets Golden valley MN 55422 300 Metro Square Bldg St. Paul mN 55101 Elliott Perovicb, Cbau man Uebt ofNaturalResources • Regionai Transit Bcard 270 Metro Square B.ae Dept Warner Road St PaL1 MN 55101 St Paul MN 55106 Doris Rivals, City Clt,, Dr Chris Huber, Supt 16 City of Has lake Spring Lake Park Sch Dist 15544 Central Ave HE 8000 Able Street HE Nam Lake MN 55304 Spring Lake Park KN 55432 Toomas Koorman, Adair, Dr Lewis Fintb, Supt City of Lexington Anoka -Henn Sch Diet 11 360J Restwoud Road 11299 Hanson Blvd Lexington MIN 55112 Coon Rapids !'J1 55433 Donald Busch, Clerk John McCiellan, Supt City of Spring Lake Fe! Ind Son Diet 12 1301 - 61st Avenue NE Centennial Schools Spring Luce Park W1 5i i2 4707 North Road Circle Pines M.N 5074 Craig Rapp, Admin Nigel Finney Metropolitan Airports Comm City of Circle Pines 9201 N Lexir ton AveLL� PO Box 1700 Minneapolis MN 55111 Circle Pines MN 55C14 • Pale 2 Randall Scn6¢ac0er, Ad..r. City of Lino Lakes 1189 Main Street Lino Lakes hW 55014 Jonn Flora Six Citlea Natersnec City of Fridley 6431 Univrsity Avtrut dC:;cn TN?'AP EYHIBIT3 Lee Star, Planr.ins Director City of Coor. Rapids 1313 Coon Rapids Blvd Coon Rapids MN 55433 Steve Tnatcoer, Director Commur.ity Development City of Mo6oda View 2401 !'15Lway 10 nounae view rW » ilc ALUL n ' III. (A) Propoaea Zooir.L Ordinances The adoption of the proposed Future Land Use Plan will result in the dewelopswst, adoption, sad order to impleuent appropriate rozonings. These two new zooirg ordinances will De termed (PC) Planoeo Commercial mod (PI) Planned Industrial Business. Pots zoning districts, will be generally nithvay oriented and will De sarvirec with City water and sewer systems. both zoning aistricta are in the process of teine, develop" by staff and will be subject to appropriate public bearings and final City Council approval. Planned Industrial (PI) is anticipated to be completed by April 1986_and impleswr.ted by June 1986. Planned Commercial (PC) is anticipated to De completed by Juba 1966 1 and in.esdated by September 1986. (B) Proposed Future Comp Plan Amendeents AS part of the City's 1985-89 Capital Improvement Program, the City will be revising its Transportauon Plan (1986), Parka Plan 0 986•- 87), Sewer Po.ley Plan (1986), Water Plan (1986), and Storm Drainage Plan (1986-87). For 1987-88 the city will be undertaking a review of the reaainine portions of the Comprehensive Plan I.; terms of the Implementation Plan and Housing Flar.. JG:jan TNP.kF E XHIBI TL M F.MO -IN): Clerk -Ad ni.it, ,tor and Ciry Cunril ifFROMt Dirortor f Putdic Works/Community I:vvel inn r DATE: februdry 11, 1,10 SUBJECT: SATF.61.11DISH ANTENNAS Attached pleasu f i I th.. followings I. Mounds Viet/ ,'Idnn ny w.w�i:ii .. n s•il'ltjnn Mn. 151-85 dated February 5, 1986. 2. Proposed ot'•iinanr, No. 403. Presently, the Cif, Code chapter 40 does nor permit thu installation If salollitc dish drtennas. The Mounds View Planning Commissio: recommends adoption of proposed ordinance No. 401 which .atrllite dish antennas in all zoning districts. The Planninq commt-;inn ,onsidercd adding the following sentence to Subdivision T a•,d subdivision U of proposed Ordinance No. 403: Property ow ors shall install a visual buffer (shrubs, trees, fend-, etr.) to screen the dish from the first floor windows of residential nu:ioings diia•rIV adjacent to the rroporty twat the dish is installed on. The Planninq commi.sion decided not to add this sentence as a requirement becaus.• they did not want to require every single satellite dish ant.•nna installation to be buffered from r.eighboting property. I recomme:d that you consider the possibility of addinq this to reduce the probabiiity of neighbors complaining about the only antenna his neighbor just installed. SWT/bac M ,,INDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSIUN 19 RESOLUTION NO. 151-85 CIrY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY s'fATF. of MINNESOTA RFSUI.iITrON F 'OMMENDING APPROVAL OF ORIIINANCI Kitt. 403 Aj.'... .. . ... _...__ nn rnu]Wi, i t � , uwi �nnr;�n •u ADDING RE 11(REIV NTS FOR SATELLITE. DISH ANIKNNAS WHEREAS, st,ff ha:: received several request for the installation r,f sat,llit, dish antennas; and NHt:R.;AS, q.00llite dish antennas are addres•cvd by the Zoning Code; and WHEREAS, tit Planning Commission rornmmend+ that satellit, dishes ne permittu t provided they meet certain requirements; NOW, THF.REF,RE, HC IT RFSI;LVED that th_ Pl.:ni,inq Commission recomm,• As approval of Ordinance No. 403 regarding satellite dish ant nnas. Adopted thi. 5th Jay of Februrary, 1986. , ATTEST: (SEAL) Thairman--- - Director of Public s%— Community Development J OkOINANCV. No. 403 ('11'1 OF MO11NIIS VIEW ('(MINTY OF kAMSKY STATE OF M1NNESOTA AMENDING THE NL .1CIPAl. CODE OF MOUNDS VIEW NY AMI1401W CN PTER 40 ENTITLED, 'ZONING' The rnuncil thv C ity of Mnund; Viow AnrR h,+r•h;. ordain: SECTION 1. i,o following shall he added to Chapter 40.04: Subdivision I. Satellite dish Antennas. Tho instil- lation of satellit dish antennas in R-1, R-2 and P—S, Residential Distri•ts, shall meet the following require- ments: ( I ) The maxi.,om rti;h diameter shall tie 12 fevt. (2) A dish w;rh a diameter larger than 3 feet shall not he i -;tall.vl on anv structure, bui1.11oq, garage, .r acn•ssory building; but shall h., ground mounted. (3) A dish sr -all n,,t be installed in a front yard or side yarI. (4t The location of a dish shall satisfy bui!,H nr setback requirvmerts of City Code Chapter 40.05, Subd. C, and solar skv space easement requirements of City rode Chapter 40.04, Subd. D. (5) The total heirht of tho installation shall not exceed 1', feet. (6) A buildi,,g permit is required prior to installa- tion. (7) The inst�ilattnn shall comply with Federal Commication Commission regulations. Subdivision U. Installation of Satellite Dish Antennas in Other Zoninr Di,;tricts shall meet the following require- ments: (1) The location of a dish shalt satisfv buildinq sethack iequir•ments of City Code Chapter 40.05, Subd. C, and solar sky space easement requirements of City 'ode chapter 40.04, Subd. D. ORDINANCE. N6. 403 PAGE: TWO OF TWQ (2) A build) ,i permit 1s required prior to installs, ion. (3) Tho inst.ilati,,n shall r_omply with Federal rnmmirat, -n Commission regulations. SECTION I1. -his ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after th. date of its publication. Read by the C.mcii of the City of Mounds View on thin _ day of --- ---- _ —' 1986. Passed by the Council of the City of Mounds Viow this _ day of _ 1986. ATTEST: (SEAL) APPRGVPD AS TO FOP`:: City Attorney Ma--Yor ------ -- -- - - ---- -- --- �_) CAerk-Administrator RF:SIII.IITION Ni). 1980 CIFY OF MOUNDS VIEW COIiNTY OF RA14SVY Suit: OF MI NNESOTA RESOLUTION A.:.ESSING THE ci rvs COST OF PRFPARING PLANS AND SPr( IFICAI'IONS AND BIDDING THE PR03ECT TWICE FOR IBLIC IMPROVE4ENT PRD.IF:Cr No. 84-5 FOR PROP RTY KNOWN AS GALE./YOST ADDITIOf1 t!HFRFA9. th. (' i t„ -.f Mo-jn,is View has rece i YPO A Wn percent petition t r• improvements for the property known as Cale/Yost Addition! and WHEREAS, th City Council of the City of Mounds View found the poitinn io be .rdequate and has received a feasihility report rrr„r-linq to City runmoil Rcsol,iti,.n No. 1766; and WHEREAS, th City rnunril has provided notire and conducted a public hearing for the proposed public, improvements; and WHEREAS, Su in Cale., 8227 Groveland Road, and Debra Yost, 8205 Grovele;i•I Road, both of Mounds View, Minnesota, signed Development \greoment No. 84-70 on May 29, 1985 and ' May 30, 1985, rccr tive!v an.n WHEREAS, Su to Cale and Debra Yost requested the City to prepare plans a•,d spe,ifications and bid the subject project twice and rssess their property for the cost; and WHEREAS, th City prenared tho plant: and specification; and bid the project tw;ce per Susan dale's and Debra Yost's roquest•:I and WHEREAS, th., outstanding hill for subject w-.rk is $4,692.00; and WHEREAS, Su,,an Cale and B,bra Yost were notated of the outstanding hill on November 7, 1985 were and requested to contact the Dir•ctor of Public Works and let him know how they would like to reimburse the City for the bill; and WHEREAS, as of February 5, 1986, there was n, response to the above Said letter; and WHEREAS, St ,n Gale and Debra Yost were given thirty (30) days written otice (certfied mail, return re.•.ript requested) of the date that the city Council will ne acting on this assessment reAoi.tioni and I RESOLUTION NO. 19H, PAGE: TWO OF TWO WNERt:As, at (f rr, omtrend': that SO pvrr.•nt .d th„ r•ost be allocated to Su to Gale's property and 50 percent -it the cost be allocated r,t Debta Yost's property. The properly identification numl'ers (PIN) are as follows: 59-30000-060-01 and 59-04100-060-6 , respectively; NOW, rNflilgf�,RE, BF' l'r RESC;L"'ED Lhat the rit:' rnurrril of the City of Moulds Vi'•w asses; the following property in the following amow,ts: 1. Susan G.le 59-30000-060-01 $2,346.00 2. Oehra Y +t 59-0411)0-060-67 $2,146.00 BE IT FURTHI R RESOLVED that the special asswistavrlts are hereby adopted, and it is found and determined that said lot, piece and par '1 "t p:-operty so asses^.ed, i I,-•m'fitted in the amounts of 1 he r-,•spective assessments levir"I ,1-1141nst it. BE. IT FURTH, R RKS'oLVE.D th.rt th•� assessment: or the benefitted parcels may be paid in cash without interest, if paid within 30 day, from October 10, 1986, or may he paid in two (2) equal, ann,:al installments in the same time and manner as the payment of real estate La%CS with int,•reat at the rate of Ilk pay annum from October 10, 1986, to December 31 of the year in hich the first payment is payahl, to be added to each subs-quent installment. BE I FINAL'Y RESr1LVF.D that the Clerk-Admin, orator is hereby authrrit•'d and directed to certi'iy a copy of the assessments aed a .-opv of this resolution to the rornty Auditor of Ramsey "ounry tr, be extended on the proper tax lists of the county for rollecten with other real .'state taxes in and for the City. ATTF.si': Adopted thi dAy of 1986 Mayor --------- SEAL) Clerl • Adaiin lairaEor �,i /D MEMO Tot Clerk-AdIniKl,,,tor and City i'uunriI I FROMt Director :f Put,lic Works/Community lk+vel,;,ment ' DA'rR: February li, 1"86 SUBJECT: R. L. Wu RNOS AND ASSOCIA'res CONTRACT R. L. Wuornos and mociates is requesting a contract increase of $1,095.00 far revision and completion of the planning study in Districts 6 and 12. It you appr ve this increase, his total cuntrnct with Ile: ity will be 1-r $6,D95.00. The 1986 Budget ct�tained $4,000.00 for planning studies. However, the $4,000.00 i. not in the budget now because of potential revenue hortf.lis. 'therefore, the City may want to allocate money from the contingency account for this work. SWT/bar M1J�11L // MEMO Tot Clerk -Ad Inist,ttor and City Council FROM: Directnt if I'u.,ltc Works/Community D0veI ;,r".•,It DA-rE: February I1, 1986 suBncn WATER TIR ATMENI PLANT No. 1 CONTROLS In March, 1984, Tto It, Kinq, Duvill, Anderson and Associates, Inc. (TKDA) c„mply .'d a municipal water system el."'trical analysis. The study recosttaended several improvements to the water system contr,ls and electrical systems. In 1984, the City l oU n,'11 eUtnut .te•i "r^'^1.'tn fl`.r riz ^tricAI work that. could be done by staff andVauth;lri2ed TKDA to prepare plans ana specifications for a new control system for Water Treatment Plant No. 1. All the w,rk rpr-mmended to be done in the report is cumpl,-ted except 1 •r till Install 'till" of :1 "" "I'll ..I ststom f". Water Treatment Plant No. 1 per 'I'KDA's plans and specifications. The estimated cost of this project is $48,000.00. There is .Honey in the 1986 water I.odgpt to complete this project. The time table for this project i. as follows: 1. Publish adv•rtisement for bid in the February 19, 1986, issue of th, New nrighton Bulletin. 2. Publish adv.•rtisement for bid in the Februar• 27, 1986, issue of th, Copsrruction Bulletin. 3. Bid opening March 12, 1986. 4. Present bid at March 17, 1986, Council Agenda meotinq. 5. Approved/rcIect bids at March 24, 1986, Council meeting. 6. Complete wr k by May 31, 1986. RECOMMENDATION: 1 recommend approving the plans and specifica- tions, advertisinu for bids on this project and pruceoding per the above srhed-lle. SWT/bac Ahk� �...i PRtn --EDINk;S OF THE CI rY C0UNCIL Cli-y OF MOONDS VIF4 ,MSEY 'OUNTY, MINNE.SUrA Canvassing Board Moetinq January 22, 1986 Mounds View �'ity 11111 2401 itighwaY 10, Mounds Vicew, M.N ",)112 Call t., orl"r 0wascal i" The Mounds View .. w�rllJnkeunoil at to order by said. 2. Pledge of The Pledge of Allegiance was Allegiance Blanchard, 3. Roil MEMBERS PRE.SENY: C,,uncliti,ombers Hankn,+r and Mayor Linke. puick, Haake, ALSO p� Clerk -Administrator Pauley• Link,/Haake moved to adopt WU 3. Adopt [inn No. 97o197- 2 Motion/Second: the Reso utuon No. 197: Canvassing park 1986 City Canvassinq Results of the Jaro,•+ry 21, the Results Reterendum of the 21, January 1986 City Park Referendum Mot i,,n 5 ayes Carried Motion;S�d::0a"kner/Blanchard �. Adjountm.•.tt to adjourn at 7 Motion 5 ayes 0 n.ies Carried tfully W11Lea1 1 t�, Paul y Cler Adminis ra DFP/mis AP i •10 ELoINOS OF THE CITY COUNCIL. 'TTY OF MOUNDS VIEW L RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA 2401 Hwy. 10, ------------------ --------------------- The Mounds View City C-unoil was called to order by Mayor Linke at 7:02 IM. the Pledge of Allegianee was said. MEMBERS PRESENT: Court. Ilnk-ml,ors Blanchard, Quick, Ilaake, Hantner and May.•r Linke. ALSO PRESENT: City Attorney Meyers, Clerk/ Administrator Pauley and Public Works/Community Development Director Thatcher. Regular Meeti .January 27, 11) Mounds View City Ha Mounds View, MN 5511 --------------- 1. Call to Order 2. Pledge of Allegianc, J. Roll Call State Senator, Steve Novak, stated he was visiting the Councils to his disLaict before the start of the legislative session on February 3, and he explained the session will be dominated by the budget and proposed cuts, and the impact those cuts will have on various program.. He reviewed some of the areas he felt might face som,r changes, and asked the Council to keep h-m irformed of what they would like done. Motion/Second: Naake/-iankner to approve the .;anuary 13, 1985 minutes as presented. 5 ayes 0 nays Mayor Linke closed the regular meeting and opened the public hearing on -#rdinance No. 404 at 7:30 PM- Clerk/Administrator PaLtley reviewed the intent of the ordinance, explaining it would bring the City into compliance with the 1985 Minnesota legislative act. Mayor Linko closed th, oub1J, hearing and rcoprncd the regular meeting at 7:32 PM. 4. Approval of Minutes: January 13, :9 Motion Carri 1 5. Public Heari tu: Consideratioi. 3rdr,. NO. 401 i Mounds View City Council January 27, 1 k•_gular Meeting Page Two ---------------------- -------------------------- ------ MOLion/Second: Quick/olanchard to have the first rea 1ng Tof Ordinance N,,. 404, an ordinance amending Chapter 4, Section 4.0: of Lt,� Home Rule Charter of the City of Mounds :iew, and waive the reading. 5 ayes 0 nays Mayor Linke closed Lhc regul.jr meeting and opened the informational meeting on the 1986 MSA street progra-m. uirecter Thatchvr rovi wed what is planned to be done with the 1986 MSA street program, and presented an overhead, showing the areas of the work. He also introduced Brian Hoffm,�n, th, Enginoerina Technician who has been working on the organization of the project. Mrs. Bailey, 2249 0juni ; Ru.i.l 112, aak,•d how much land would be taken fr.,in her. Dirertcr Thatchar expl ,ned that all work would be done within the existinq right-of-ways, and they will not be taking any private property. He added that construction is planned for this summer but a definite starting date has nut been determined yet. Chuck Miller, 5287 Raymond, expressed concern with where_ the water froze the ditch in front of his property would go. Director That_her explained they will be sub -cutting, and the road will be low enough for the eater to flow into the street, and the curb and gutter wili act as a channel for the run-vff. Mr. Miller asked if County Road H2 is being upgraded for the industrial park. Mayor Linke replied that it is not, and that the only exit the industrial park will have onto County Road H2 will be an emergency one. Mayor Linke closed the informational meeting and reopened the regular meeting at 7:45 PM. The Council recognized DUanc McCarty, the newly elected Ramsey County .'ommissioner. 7 Motion Ca 6. Informatl Meeting: 1986 MSA Program Residents Requests Comments the Floor 1 10 January 27, 1 Mounds View City Cuunc,l Page Three ;iegular Mectina -- ----------------- ------------------ — - ---- --------------------- �- Commissioner McCarty bi tted he wanted to reaffirm his commitment to opal communication lines with the Council, and he hopes t., get more dialoque between the City and the County Board. He added he will be sitting down with the Mayor and Clerk/Administrdtor within the next few days. clerk/Administrator Pauley asked that Becker's 8. ApprovConsenalP., Sanitation be added to item E, for a new license for garbage hauling, t,, expiry on March 30, 1986. Motion/Second: Heake/I+lanchard to approve the consent agenda, a_ amei,Jed, ..nd waive the reading of the resolutions. Motion Ca 5 ayes 0 nays Park Director Anderson presented the Council with 9. Department a summary of the park .•i,d rec program, as requested Reports by the Council earlier, to be submitted to the school district. Park Director Anderson reviewed the aquatics pr-igram, stating that 323 peopl, are presently enrolled, with 14 different lessons b�jng offered. The recreation department had a cross country ski by candlelight outing, +hick was successful. They are trying to stay on i.p of the Edgewood Community Center situation, as tt,ey utilize the facility a good deal right now ant would like o continue that use. Park Director Anderson stateu that in the parks department, he had spent a great deal of time with the Task Force working on the referendum, which did not pass. The Par*: and Rec Commission will be meeting on January 30, at which time they will review what has happened and where to go now. The fore-t<y program is going very well, and it has been very successful having a shared position with New Brighton for the forester. 'ark Director Anderson reviewed the plantings and disease that was experienced. He also announced the City had been awarded the Tree i'ity award Once again. Finance Director Brager explained they had adopted the budget in late seltcmber, with the mill rate not increasing. They .,re bcainning work on the annual report and financial statements at this time. Mounds view City Counc.i January 27, 1 Regular Meeting ----------Page-Four --------------------------------------------- ------- finance Director Bragef reported he had assisted in counting ballots during tha special election. one machine will be sent in for repair, as they had trouble with it during the election. Finance Director Bragef reviewed investments that had been made wit[ the City's money, which resulted in $400,589 in interest earned during 1965, with a return of H.88. Finance Director Bragei reported he has been .f appointee ti, the r.-;ard ......... .. Q::-'----- Minnesota Governor's Finance organization for 1986. ?uiice Chief kamacher ,eviewed the crime statis- tics for 1985 versus 11,84, explaining there was about a one percent increase in total crime. He presented overheads showing the breakdowns in the various categories and how they compared between th•_ two years. Chief Ramacher revieweu the personnel changes for the past year. He add..l the}' are looking forward to having the new computer in City Hall, and in getting the reserve officers in place. Director Thatcher reviewed the 12 full-time positions in the Public Works/Community Development department and what they do. He updated the Council on the ongoing activities of each area. Director Thatcher presented an overhead, comparing 3985 and 1984 statistics on applications and permits and revenues. Ile adued he rill be presenting the Council with a memo at tneir next agenda session regarding the proposed addition to the publi-, works garage, and projected costs. Motion/Second: Blanchard/Quick to approve Resolu- lo. Considerations ,f tion Ho. 1976, setting the 1986 wage for the police Staff Memo Rt•gar department part-time clerk -typist, and waive the ing Ratelf86 wage reading. Dept. Clerk/'.'yl•i 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Clerk/Administrator Pa��Iey reviewed the reasons 11. Consideration rt for the pudge[ overrun in the Eire department. Staff Memo Ruq.-ring Fire De Councilmember Blanchard reported she will be attend- Contingency ing the Fire Board meeting next week, and will report back to the Cou oil. Mounds View City Council January 27, 1 Regular Meeting Rage Five --------------------------------- ------------------ t lotion/Second: Hacknet/Blanchard to approve an expen iturc•-if $2,440 against 1985 funds, to replenish the fire department's c,ntingi,ncy fund per the Fire Chief's memorandum and milling statement dated December 31, 1985, witt. the funds to come from the general fund fire department account. 5 ayes 0 rays l:ierkjndmin.aLiaL.it Pai.r=y asLed the Cuuu�ii to ratify the appointment cif tl.i. precinct and counting center election Judges for the special election, and explained why they were being ratified after the election, due to prublons in lining everyone up beforehand. Motion Cal Motion/Second: Hanknet/Quick to approve Resolution 12. Considerate u. 1973, ratifying the appointment of precinct and Nosn1973r N county counting center election judges for the special Clerk/Administrator election and city park referendum by and settinq wage rates, and waive the reading. 5 ayes 0 nays Jirector Thatcher had uv further report. Attorney Meyers reported he had been forwarded a letter received by the City from the owners of the del Rae Ballroom, m,�rmaid, Donatclle's and Loose Ends, asking the City to amend the ligacr ordinance regarding individual licenses versus corporate licenses. Hc explained the owners are asking for corporate li enses due to insurance rates, but he would recommend leaving them as individual licenses, making one individual the responsible party. He reviewed problems that have been experienced in the past with corporate licenses. It was the corsensus of the Council to remain with the individual liquor licenses. Clerk/Administrator Pa,.!ey stated he would invite the parties to the next agenda session so they could discuss the issue with Lhe Council. Motion Carrt.J I i. Report of f -il 1 r Works/Community Dvlpt. Dirortor 14. Report of Attorney Mounds View City Council January 27, 1 Regular Meeting -- ----------------------------'age Six - Attorney Meyers repurtL,.l an order had come down from the Minnesota Supreme Court, denying a discre- tionary review of the t:regory Johnson case. He added that it is anticipated that many cities will cite the Mounds View case in thL future in their proceedings. Attorney Meyers reported he would be absent from the next Council meeting, .,nd Mark Karney will be attending in his place. Councilmember Blancharu had no report. 15. Report of Councilmeml Councilmember Quick had no report. Councilmember Haake reported she had attended part of the Festivities Commission meeting earlier in the evening, and they are interested in moving the date of the annual appreciation dinner to the Saturday night of the Festival in the Park, which will be July 19 and 20 this ye„i. Alice Frits stated the festivities Commission feels it would be a better way to tie the two day festival together. It was agreed that the council would discuss the issue further at the n.\,t Council agenda session, and Councilmember Haakc would get back to the Festivities Commission after that. Councilmember Hankner had no report M4yor Linke had no report. Clerk/Administrator Pauley passed out information 16. Report of regarding the Anoka Chamber of Commerce breakfast Clerk/Admir.i tr on January 29, aL which Governor Perpich will be the guest speaker. He sdded he would make reser- vations for those Councrlmembers planning on attending. Clerk/Administrator Parley reviewed an Action Alert he had just received regarding the Governor's proposed budget cuts, and the impact they could have on Mounds View. no added Staff will be watching things closely. Motion/Second: Haake/ilanchard to adjourn the meeting at 9:09 PM. 5 ayes 0 nays �j4+ectfyy�y ib t d, ClW/Administrdtof 17, Adjournme. Motion Car #