HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packets - 1986/03/10CITY coow II. MEETING
CITY or mo(INI)S VIEW
MARCH 10, 1986
7:UU P.M,
A G F. N D A
Call to Order
2. Pledge of Allegiance
3. Roll Call - Haake, Hankner, Blanchard, Quick, Linke
4. Approval of Minutes: February 24, 1986
Reqular Meptina
5. Residents Requests and Comments From The Floor
--------------------------------------------------------
C1'r I LENS: HEFORE SPEAKING PLEASE GIVE Yt H1R FULL NAME
AND ADDRESS FOR THE MINUTES
-------------------------------------------------
Approval of ConRnnt Agonda
ITEM A. Approve Resolutions No. 1984 Denvinq Applica-
tion of the U. S. Hockey Hall of Fame for a
Charitable Gambling Licpnse at MUldonns
ITEM B. Reject Original Bids for Outdoor Warning Sirens
and Accept the Proposal from Corrigan Electric
dated February 20, 1986 to Relocate the City's
Current Sirens and Furnish and Install a
Federal Signal Thunderheam Siren at a Cost of
$12,600.00. Further, Authorize Service of
Existinq Sirens at a Cost not to Exceed
$2,400.00
ITEM C. Approve Contract with Precision Busin_ss
Systems, Inc. for Maintenance of City Dictation
Equipment at a Cost of $480 Per Year Effective
March 2, 1986
ITEM D. Approve Hiring of Shamim Sabur as Accounting
Clerk at a Wage Rate of S7.O0/hour with Salary
Consideration to be Given After Successful
Completion of a Six Month Probationary Period
Effective March 10, 1986
ITEM E. Authorize Mayor and Clerk-AdminiRtrator to
Enter into a Joint Powers Agrpement with the
City of New Brighton for a Joint Aquatic.
Director Position Contingent Upon Approval by
the City of Now Rrighton
AGENDA
MARCH 10, 1986
PAGE IVO
ITEM F. Approve Resolution No. 1983 Reaardinq Municipal
State Aid Streets
ITEM G. Authorize Purchase of Chlorine Equipment from
Layne Minnesota per Quotation datod
Fehruary 11, 1986 in the Amount of $1,557.00
with Funds Coming from the Water System Capital
Improvement Account
ITEM H. Accept Low Quotation from Solidification, Inc.
for the 1986 Sanitary Sewer Televising Program
at a Cost not to Exceed $13,55U.00. Funds to
Come from the Sanitary Sewer Capital
Improvement and Maintenance Account
ITEM I. Authorize Mayor and Clerk -Administrator to
Enter into Architect-Enqineer Agreement with
Toltz, King, Dewall, Anderson and Associates,
Inc. for Construction Engineering Services for
Municipal Water System Electrical improvements
in an Amount not to Exceed $5,000. Funds to
Come from the Watcr System Capital Improvement
and Maintenance Account
ITEM ,1. Set Public Hearing for a Conditional Use Permit
for a Self -Service Car Wash at 2135 Program
Avenue for 7:05 p.m., April 14, 1986
ITEM K. Approve Resolution No. 1985 Approving Just and
Correct Claims Against City Funds
ITEM L. Licenses for Approval
Garbage Haulers - Expires 3/31/87
Ace Solid Waste Management, Inc. - Renewal
General - Expires 6/30/86
Brunn Construction - Renewal
Forsman Construction - New
Fred Vogt and Company - New
Siding - Expires 6/30/86
D. M. Trawey Sidirq - New
7. Consideration of Civil Service Commission Recommendation
to Promote David Brick to the Position of Police
Lieutenant and Jerome Johnson and Reed Krogh to the
Position of Patrol Sergeant, Effective March 15, 1986.
The rate of pay shall he that provided for in the 1986
budget and all three positions shall have a one year
probationary period.
LN
AGENDA
MARCH 10, I'1Nb
PAGE 'rMRE6
U. Consideration of Leondrd Kremer's Spring I-iKe rare
Knolls Malor Subdivision (2 lots into 6 zero lot line
lots)
9. Consideration of Staff Recommendation to Authorize
Purchase of Computer Equipment (maurrial to he provided Monday evening)
10. Second Readinq and Adoption of Ordinani•o fb,. 403
Amendinq the Municipal Code of Mnunda View by Amending
Chapter IU Entitled, "7nninq"
11. Consideration of Statt Memorandum and Resolutinn
A-,thorizinq Release of the Contract Rond for Development
Ayrvemenl Nn. uJ-60 with Star Huma „ Ltd.
12. Report of Public Works/Community Development Director
13. Report of Attorney
14. Report (it Counrilmomhers: flaake, Ilanknvr Blanchard,
Quick, Linke
16. Report of Administrat,fr
17. Adjournment
CONSEN r AGENDA
MARCH 10, 1986
The Consent Anenda is A technique designed to expetlite
hand Iiltq of rmutino and misrpllanpous official business of
the City Council. The entire agenda may ho adopD!d tV the
Cnunril in one motion. The motion f,,r adoption is non -
debatable and must receive unanimous approval. By request
of any individual Councilmember, an item can be removed from
the Consent AgentiA and PIAred upon the Regular Agentia for
dcha to.
I I t:M A. Aporow, Ros,01, 1 �.. nq iM ,Mt.. 191181411
lk-nV i nq ApP, i ra-
11."1 .,I the Y
Charitable Gamhiinq Li Dose at Muldrn,ns
ITEM A. Reiert Orininal Rids for Outdoor warninq Sirens
.e„I Arr.gH 11'.. Pt ••p^' tl fr'.m Cn,'t i+ae Clertrie
dated Februdry 21), 1986 to RelnrAto the City's
Current Sirens and Furnish anti Install A
Foderal Siqnal Thunderhoam Siren At a Cost of
$I2,6UU.UU. Fit Ithot , At, thorizv S.�rvu•,, of
r.xiatinq Sirens at a Cost not to Exceed
' $2,4UO.00
ITEM r, Approve Contract with Precision Business
5yst,r1jr:, Inc. for Maint-enAnre of City Dictation
F:,Itliprnent at a Cast of $480 Por Year Effective
M.Ir,•h 2, 1986
ITEM D. Approve Hiring of Shamim Sabur ati Arcounrinq
CI.'rk at a wage Rate of S7.00/hour with Salary
Considerati,ul r„ hr Given Aft•-r !tnrrrssful
Completion of I six Month Probationary Period
Effective MArrh 10, 1986
Authorize MaY,.r and Clprk-Administrab.r to
Enter into a Joint Powers Airecment with the
t'ity of New 11rit1hron for A Joint Aquirby
Director P„sition Continnent ❑pon Approval
ti,e City nt Now Briqhton
ITEM F. APPr,Ive Resolution No. 1983 Rpgardinq Municipal
9tatp Aid Strt�ots
ITEM G. Authorize Puorhage of Chlorine Equipment from
I.Ayne Minnesota POr Quotation datG111
F'uhrudry Il, 1986 in the Amount of $1,557.00
with Funds t'ominq from the War-r System Capital
Improvement Avrount
ITEM if. At, pt Low Vur,tdtIon tr,)m Sol t,it firatiun, Inc.
f�.r the 1986 Sdnirary Sower Tplevlainq Program
At I Cnst not to EKI"'OA SIf,'�.uU. Funds to
11uro. trom tht• Sanitary Suwer CdPttal
Improvome"' .ind M.Itntenanre Amount
CONSENT AGENDA
MARCH 10, 1486
PAGE TWO
ITEM 1. Author izo Mayor and Clark-Admj n i st rater to
Enter into Architect -Engineer Agreement with
Toltz, King, Dewall, Anderson and Associates,
Inc. for Construction Enqineerinq Servi-es for
Municipal Wat,•r SYatem ElectriCal Improvements
in an Amount not to F.xreed S5,000. Funds to
Come from the Water System Capital Improvement
and Maintrnanro Account
ITEM .1. Set PUhlir Hearinq for a Conditional Use Permit
for a Self -Service Car Wash at 1135 Proqram
nvonuo lur 7:0', p.m., April 11, 1986
IrEM K. Approve Resolution No. 1985 Approving Just and
Correct Claims Against CitY Funds
I'rEM L. Licenses ter Approval
Garbage Haulers - Expires 3/31/87
Act? solid Na+;te Management, Inc. - Renewal
General - Expires 6/30/86
N runn C�nsrrnCtion - Renewal
F„rsman Connliurl tun - N,•w
Fred Voqt and Company - New
sidint - Expires 6/30/86
D. M. 'rrawcy St-jinq - New
91
PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA
Regular Meeting
February 24, 1966
Mounds View City Hall
2401 Hwy. 10, Mounds View, MN 55112
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Mounds View City Council was called to order by 1. Call to Order
Mayor Linke at 7:00 PM on February 24, 1986.
The Pledge of Allegiance was said.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Councilmembers Quick, Haake, Hankner,
Blanchard and Mayor Linke.
ALSO PRESENT: Clerk/Administrator Pauley and Public
Works/Community Development Director Thatcher.
Motion/Second: Blanchard/Quick to approve the February
10, 1986 minutes as presented.
5 ayes 0 nays
Frank Blaciak, 5479 Adams Street, asked the Council's
help in controlling the parking problem in his
neighborhood. He stated they have had problems with
the apartment residents and their guests parking
along the street and in front of the homes in the
area, and the past weekend someone had parked their
vehicle in his driveway while visiting at the apartment
building. He stated he had called the police and they
called a tow truck but the owner did return for his
vehicle before it was towed. Ha added in his case
it could present very serious problems as they have a
chronically ill child who has had to be rushed to the
hospital and his car that night was blocked in the
garage by this vehicle.
Mayor Linke stated he had received Mr. Blaziak's letter
and had discussed it with the Clerk/Administrator,
Public Works/Community Deveiopment Lirect�r a;;.:
Police Chief, and there are no parking signs posted,
f11d they have met in the past with the apartment owners,
•ho are not willing to make any improvements to their
parking area, as it would involve a cost to them.
2. Pledge of
Allegiance
3. Roll Call
4. Approval of
Minutes:
February 10,
1986
Motion Carried
S. Residents
Requests and
Comments from
the Floor
Mounds View City Council 4 February 24, 1985
Regular Meeting U I `I i. . . . Page Two
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Clerk/Administrator Pauley added that the City had
advised the owners that they would allow them to
build a parking area on the boulevard, but the owners
do not want to spend the money. He added they cannot
prevent someone from parking in someone else's
driveway, and recommended the police be called, who
could then call a tow truck and ticket the offender.
Mayor Linke stated Director Thatcher would be writing
a letter to the apartment owners, advisinq them of
the problem.
Councilmember Hankner asked Mr. Blaziak's permission
to include a copy of his letter, with his name and
address removed. Mr. Blaziak consented.
Mayor Lirke closed the regular meeting and opened 6. Public Hearing:
the public hearing on the Spring Lake Park Knolls Spring Lake
Addition. Park Knolls
Addition
Director Thatcher explained that Leonard Kremer is
proposing to subdivide two lots into six zero lot
line lots.
Mr. Kremer reviewed the proposed development,
stating the hardship involved would be an economic
one, as they have had this property for several
years and the taxes continue to increase more than
they can raise the rents.
Director Thatcher stated the Planning Commission
has reviewed this and granted a variance on the
northeast lot, since the County took a large amount
of land from that piece of property to widen
County Road I. He added a few minor details are
still required from Mr. Kremer before final
approval could be granted.
Mr. Kremer reviewed the plans they have for ponding
the site.
Director Thatcher stated the existing storm water
retention pond does have meet existing City codes
as it does not provide a positive outlet, and the
new pond would be built to code.
Bruce Wolfe, 7685 Groveland Road, stated his property
&butts this proposed development and they have had
problems with pending in the past and they have often
Lad standing water J' deep on the property. He stated
the land is too low to allow for any further development.
' ^ r -.
M6unda View City Council ( ,, February ?I, 1986
Regular Meeting Peg* Three
---------------------------------------------- »_»__._-_-----
Mr. Wolfe presented d petition with 22 signatures on it
if residents who are against adding the proposed
additional double bungelow due to the water problems.
He added they have also experienced parking problems
in the area from the double bungelows.
Director Thatcher explained that if the existing hold-
ing pond is redesigned, it should eliminate the water
problem they presently have.
Mr. Kremer reviewed how the drainage system would be
constructed and where the water would flow and would
pond.
Jeanette Spiczka, 7644 Groveland Road, asked what a
zero lot line was and whether the City has any others.
Mayor Link^ explained what a zero lot line is. Director
Thatcher named some other locations in the City that
have a zero lot line.
Mrs. Spiczka asked if the Planning Commission was
required to notify the residents of the area that they
were discussing the request.
Director Thatcher replied the Planning Commission was
not required to do so, but the Council is and they
have done so.
Craig Zuidema, 2809 County Road I, stated he feels
there is such a problem already that they could not
build another structure there and not add to the
problem.
Mayor Link-3 stated that the plans show the developer
would slope the drain -off down and it should ncr
effect any of the residents.
Mrs. Spiczka stated the City was concerned about
a water problem there 10 years ago when they built
their home.
Mrs. Wolfe stated there is already enough of a
problem there, and another duplex would only add
to it. She stated she was also concerned with
placing another structure there, as it would
crowd the neighborhood.
Director Thatcher explained that the development
agreement would assure that the developer would
not create a problem. He added that it is to the
.!evesoper's benefit to do it right the first time.
Mounds View City Council February 24, 1986
Regular Meeting I • Page Four
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Councilmember Haake stated it was not the Planning
Commission's intent to have a cluster of duplexes in
that area. She added she has observed problems there
with water and parking and so forth, and added that
she does not feel an economic hardship is sufficient.
Councilmember Blanchard stated she was also concerned
with the water problem.
Councilmember Quick questioned why zero lot lines were
not used with the original two duplexes.
Mr. Kremer responded that the City did not have zero
lot lines at that time, but they were built to meet
those requirements, with individual services and so
forth.
Councilmember Quick asked if the proposed changes would
enhance the drainage on the lots.
Director Thatcher replied it would as it would provide
a larger detention pond.
Councilmember Hankner stated she was concerned with the
parking issue and felt the rouncil should look into it
further. ,
Mr. Wolfe presented a letter from one of the property
owners, who could not be present. Clerk/Administrator
Pauley read the letter, from Terry Martinson, 7653
Groveland Road, who stated he was against the development.
Mrs. Neagbour, 7660 Groveland Road, stated there -
problem already with cars parking along the road, and
her family had built in Moun!s View 19 years ago because
they liked the large lots and openess, and they do not
want to see it go any smaller.
Mayor Linke stated he was not concerned with the pro-
posed drainage plan but he did have a problem with
w inn Pronomics as justification for allowing this.
He also pointed out that parking is a problem.
Councilmember Hankner suggested eunLinuing the discussion
to the next agenda session, where they could look at
some solutions to the problems that have been brought up.
Mr. Zuidema stated he feels putting in a duplex there
enci uGel,tlb uu Ll,c [,-: .,.a.
Mr. Wolfe stated he feels the Council was more than
fair in allowing the Kremer's to put up the first two
duplexes. He added there has been a controversy all Is
along and he does not feel any more concessions should
be given.
; Mounds view City Council February 24, 198u t) page Five
Regular Meeting ---page-Five- ----
-------- ------------ ----
r. Kremer stated he does not feel the city gave ""7
C
ny concessions, and they are not asking based on an
conomic hardship alone, but because it makes sense.
He added it is a proven fact that multiple family
dwellings get fewer services than single family. He
also stated he would be willing to work with the City
on the parking problem.
Mayor Linke closed the public hearing and reopened
the regular neeting at 8:05 PM. He added they will
continue the discussion at the next agenda session,
on March 3.
istrator
Councilmemprovidekner the Council lwithAtheninformation
Pauley to p
from the parking study that was done approximately
a year ago, at the agenda session.
7. Approval of
Motion/Second: Quick/Hankner to approve the
and waive the reading
:consent
Consent Agenda
a, as presented,
of the resolutions.
Motion Carrred
5 ayes 0 nays
Councilmember Hankner asked Clerk/Administrator
salary
Pauley for information regarding the
for non -union employees, including a
Increases
information from the Stanton
COPY of the previous
survey.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley replied he would do a
comparative analysis for 1985.
8. 2nd Reading and
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reviewed the purpose of
Adoption of
proposed Ordinance No. 405.
Ord. No. 405
Motion�eCdndndaopt8nonnof/ordinancehNo 405 the second
an
reading No. 390, prohibiting
ordinance renewing ordinance
certain properties on an interim
development of
basis, and waive the reading.
Councilmember Quick - dYe
Councilmember Haake - aye
Councilmember Hankner - aye
Councilmember Bldnchard - aye
Motion Carried
Mayor Linke - aye
Mounds View City Council y/ 1i ` 4 , W February 24, 1986
Regular Meeting UPage Six
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Director Thatcher reviewed proposed Ordinance No. 403. 9. 1st Reader
of Ordin
Motion/Second: Hankner/Blanchard to have the first No. 403
reading No. 403, amending the municipal
cn,le of Mounds View by amenriin.. rh.a,t.r an Pntitioei
"Zoning", and waive the rPAdinn.
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Director Thatcher reviewed proposed Ordinance No. 406. 10. 1st Reading of
He recommended a public hearing be held, either before Ordinance No.
or after the first reading. 406
Councilmember Blanchard stated she would like to table
the first reading until after the public hearing, as
long as there is no great rush for this rezoning.
Motion/Second: Blanchard/Quick to table the first
reading of Ordinance No. 406 until after the public
hearing, and set the public hearing for March 24, 1986
at 7:05 PM.
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Director Thatcher updated the Council on the status 11. Report o
of Well 41. He explained they have pulled the well Public We /
pump and motor and they definitely need a new pump, Community
and they could repair the motor at a cost of $2,500, Development
or purchase a new, more energy efficient motor for Director
$4,500. He stated he will have additional information
for the Council at their next agenda session.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley added there are adequate
funds in the Maintenance and Capital Improvement
Account for the Sewer and Water Department.
Mayor Linke reported that Attorney Karney was 12. Report of
detained out of town. Attorney
Councilmember Quick reported he had attended a 13. Reports of
joint Park and Rec Commission meeting on February Councilmembers
13, at Brightwood Hills, which included Mounds View,
New Brighton, Shoreview, Arden Hills and Maplewood.
He stated he felt the meeting was successful and
they were all brought up to date on the new county
park at Long Lake. He added their main concern
seeded to ba furriiiiq Oi Lire wo♦u cuar«c.
Councilmember Haake reported she had attended the
Festivities Commission meeting earlier in the
evening, and Tony Jambor is proposing a citizens
dance, which the City would be involved in. She
Mounds View City Council - v February 24, 198E
Regular Meeting Page Seven
------------------------------------------------------------------'I---------
added further details would be forthcoming.
Councilmember Hankner asked how much revenue was
generated from the 2b illegal parking notices that
were issued in January. Clerk/Administrator Pauley
replied the revenue is $10 per ticket, with the
rnllertion rate hei— -,,proximately Fri
Councilmember Blanchard reported she had attended
the Planning Commission agenda session last week
and that not much was happening.
Mayor Linke reported he would be meeting with the
mayors of Shoreview and New Brighton later in the
evening to discuss how the cities can become more
involved and assist the school district in long
range planning.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported the Council 14. Report of
had authorized Staff to prepare a request for Clerk/
proposal for insurance for next year, and he asked Administrator
if the Council would like to review the REP's
before they go out. He added that once they are
received, he will be reviewing them with Council -
member Haake and Finance Director Brager, before
they make a recommendation to the Council.
Motion/Second: Haake/Linke to adjourn the meeting 15. Adjournment
at 8:38 PM.
ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Respectfully submitted,
Donald F. Pauley
Clerk/Administrator
•j r! S /� F
Up?drL,4j1L«sa.� ('!
a,X 7'� � �r ►�
y f�
l i iV J LJ
4o fig Ikt&e •~3kc,;
e 4u
p L/ 1
WE THE UNDERSILHNED ARE CPPOSEO 'PO ANY tZZONImG
OR CONSTRUCTIGN GP At:Y KIND AT, 1680/92 AND '9690/92
SILVER LAKE ROAD.
U f vi'if r I i'v V iLU
ALDRESS
7c fl t'L� �(lH(t Kt(.
X3`l
rc. � .� .c� •crc 1 "Iel.• � �� /
's /5 J
.:-/" t e
j•
LV
/ 1
UND
0
0
I
91
RESOLUTION NO. 1984
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MI`!9 ccn re
RESOLUTION DENYING A CHARITABLE GAMBLING LICENSE TO THE
UNITED STATES HOCKEY HALL OF FAME.
WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Mounds View City Council
to establish a policy for organizations that would be authorized
to conduct charitable gambling in licensed liquor establishments
in the City of Mounds View.
WHEREAS, the Mounds View City Council adopted ordinance
no. 400 amending the municipal code of Mounds View by modifying
charter 100 entitled "Intoxicatinq Liquor" and chapter 101
entitled "Non -intoxicating Liquor"; and
WHEREAS, the Mounds View City Council adopted resolution
1969 clarifyinn the policy on ornanizations authorized to conduct
charitable qamblinq in licensed liquor establishments in the City
of Mounds View; and
WHEREAS, ordinance no. 400 stipulates that only organiza-
tions sponsored by a fraternal, religious, veteran or other non-
profit organization that have their registered offices in the
City of Mounds View, and have been in existence for at least
three years with at least 30 active members may secure a
charitable qamblinq license.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Ignites States
Hockey Hall of Fame does not meet the policies as outlined in
ordinance no. 400 for charitable gamblino; and
THEREFORE BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Mounds View does hereby deny the application for a
charitable qamblinq license based on the policies as outlined in
ordinance no. 400.
ATTEST:
Adopted this 10th day of March, 1986.
Jerome W. Linke, Mayor
(SEAL)
Donald F. paulev, clerk -Administrator
MEMO TO: Clerk -Administrator and City Council
FPO-; Director of Public works/Community Developmen k'I
DATE: February 19, 1986
SUBJECT: DESIGNATION OF M.S.A. STREETS
As you may recall, the City has proposed redesrgnating N.S.A.
streets.
The request was submitted to the Department of Transportation.
(MnDOT). MnDOT has given the redesignations their preliminary
approval and requesL that we approve a resolution.
I have attached a resolution for your approval, Also attached
is my letter, with attachments, to MnDOT dated December 11, 1985.
RECOMMENDATION:
I recommend approval of Resolution No. 1983.
SWT/bac
Attacivnents
RESOLUTION NO. 1983
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION REGARDING MUNICIPAL STATE AID STREETS
WHEREAS, it appears to the City Council of the City of
Mounds View that the Municipal State Aid streets hereinafter
described should be redesignated;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the roads described
as follows, to -wit:
1) Unconstructed Woodale Drive from County Road H-2
to Highway 10
2) Unconstructed Jackson Drive from Woodale Drive
to County Road H
3) County Road H from Jackson Drive to Highway 10
4) Red Oak Drive from Highway 10 to County Road J
be, and hereby are established, located, and designated Municipal
State Aid Streets of said City, subject to the approval of the
Commissioner of Highways of the State of Minnesota;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the roads described ds follows,
to -wit:
1) Hillview Road from Quincy Street to 35W Service
Road
2) Edgewood Drive from County Road I to Hillview Road
3) Ardan Avenue from Red Oak Drive to Long Lake Road
4) Jackson Drive from County Road H-2 to Hillview Road
be, and hereby are not designated Municipal State Aid Streets
of said City, subject to the approval of the Commission of
Highways of the Stata of Minnesota;
BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that the City Clerk -Administrator
is hereby authorized and directed to forward two certified copies
of this resolution to the District State Aid Engineer for his
cor,siderativu dnd approval.
Adopted this loth day of March, 1986.
ATTEST:
DEAL:
MAYOR
CYERK-ADMINISTRATOR
c 'i` /%7l 1 _'
MEMO TO: Clerk -Administrator and City Council / 7
FROM: Director of Public Works/Community Development /
DATE: March 6, 1986
SUBJECT: SELF-SERVICE CAR WASH AT 2135 PROGRAM AVENUE
Attached please find the following:
1. Staff report dated 2/19/86.
2. Planning application dated 2/7/86.
3 Rice Creek Watershed District letter dated 1/31/85.
4. Planning Commission Resolution No. 154-86.
5. Site plan and elevations dated 2/6/86.
The Planning Commission recommends approval of this planning
application. The applicant will attend the City Council agenda
session on March 17, 1986. In order to speed up the approval
process the Planning Commission recommends setting a public
hearing for 7:05 p.m. on April 14, 1986.
SWT/bac
ME?ROWASM
.1
lz
.'� ll11r Y0NC • .
I1 '
PLM
.^ Q
_4 _ • Vr`i�V
• • �M�=I�YrPY�••
d u
WE nn,
8 mvW
(NO FLEVAT"
REAR ELEVATION
FRONT (LEVATION
--_- FLOOR RAN -.
ELEVATIONS
BOOR VLAN
STAFF §Y**
cify ivourJ,4
Ir
AS
PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW DATE: February 19, 1986
AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: 4
F CASE NUMBER: 185-86
APPLICANT: Bruce Holton
W PROPOSED REQUEST: Applicant requests development
review approval to construct a 4,000 square foot self-
CYservice .. at warn.
w1 LOCATION OF REQUEST: 2135 Program Avenue
W
s1� SITE SIZE: 20,000 square feet (0.45 acres)
LOT DEPTH AND WIDTH:
Q 163.64' x 82.i4' x 182.11' x 170.69'
O
z
Q
Ij
EXISTING ZONING: B-3, Highway Business District
CONTIGUOUS LAND USE: 8-3
CONFORMANCE TO COMPREHENSIVE LAND USF PLAN: Request
conforms.
ZONING CONFORMANCE TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Zoning
conforms provided the applicant sacures a conditional
use permit.
STAFF REPORT
CASE NO. 185-86
PAGE TWO UP THREE
SETBACKS
Proposed structures, paving and curbing satisfy setback
requirements.
ACCESS
The applicant proposes a one-way entrance on Program Avenue and a
one-way exit cn Program Avenue.
DRAINAGE
Approval from Rice Creek Watershed District is not required (see
attachment). The applicant's storm water detention pond will be
installed on the south side of the site and the design will be
approved by the City Engineer prior to City Council approval.
PARKING
The applicant proposes ` 'ing spaces
curb aand
nd B-6-IRutter satisfyand
ity
gutter. The 2 parking spaces
Code requirements.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
City Code requires the City Council to conduct a public hearing
on the conditional use permit. in order for a car wash to be
installed in a B-3 zoninq district, the site must receive a
conditional use permit from the City. The requirements are
listed in City Code Chapter 40.18, Subd. D(2). I will summarize
the requirements of this section of the City Code as follows:
a) Architectural appearance shall be similar to existing
building in the area.
b) The application shall provide stacking space to
accommodate the number of vehicles that can be washed
during a maximum 30 minute period. The applicant will be
submitting this shortly to the City Engineer for approval.
c) Additional screening is required when development is next
to a residential district.
d) Each light standard island and all islands in the parkinq
lot shall be landscaped or covered.
e.) Pertains to screening residential districts.
f) Applicant sartsfins with these requirements.
g) Applicant will satisfy these requirements.
PAGE. THREE OF THREE
STAFF REPORT
CASE No, IRS-86
h) All lighting shall he hooded and not visible from public
right-of-way.
i! These requirements are satisfied.
j) All signs will comply with the Mounds View Sion rode.
k) Are noise control provisions aleyuate7
1) Are provisions of Section In.25, Sutwi. AM of this Code
satisfied?
CURB AND D GUTTER
The applicant shall install cross curb and gutter it each
entrance per the City Engineer's recommendations.
GAP.BAGE DISPOSAL
Are the provisions for garage disposal adequate?
ATTACHMENTS
Attached please find the following:
1. Application dated February 7, 1986.
2. Letter from Rice Creek Watershed District dated January
31, 1985.
3. Site and elevations plans.
4. An 11 page booklet describing the self-service, car wash
operation.
SAND AND SUDS TRI1P
The applicant shall submit drawinqs of the sand and suds trap
they propose to install for each bay. Their design of the sand
and suds trap shall be approved by the City Enginear prior to
city council approval.
SPRINKLER SYSTEM
A fire sprinkler system mdy be required by the City Code.
HATER AND SEWER SERVICE
r'ity water and sewer service is available in the street.
PLANNING PwPLIt MOM • o.,tn _2 /7 GY
FtDLT&.! phone 7�+I • 4l:
APPLI[ANt: name — -
7 qa�yic{jSC._
address --
Interest In property (check approprihle LOP):
O owner of record
O It,:er, upelotur, manager
O contract Fur deed owner au •'r &fit Iu purchase
13 othe, (explain) — ---- - --
0ocumenta,r evidunce of applicant'♦ inter.-.' in the property G-ay L -
required betora final city at"un on Ili"' ".Quest'
N6A.1 /1w ia_ 0 Co /CC �• -• --
Pk01•EATY: address/general Incatiun •__—_ ___..._...�.---
ZN
legal gnu•r; name/aAJrr,s,�/rw+a_.i9 �Aw�` -.
present use (check aPProPriale box).
J16-unJrvelupeJ
O 1,usiness establisltaaent
1J single (molly dw�l!in,; (3 indu••lria establishment
EJ dupicx dwtl Iiiui U .{,artmrnl.
E) other (explain)
,lEQl1EST: (explain)
1 herelry, declare that the.d,uve stsle•waI•. .ue hu•.—j;iynature)
raft ema 115E ONM
VASE FEFSs
eubdiviston, 'major ($150) —
subdivision, minor ($75) _ —_.
rezoning (550)
conditional o.w 050) - • sy
variance
code Weal
subtotal
*past fees In parenthesis art nay`
rrfuadablt.
Park fund d&ditation
date paid ._ ..
recelllt A _
AuG,lll'I-1 rf.t.
u.!,l iw;aip, •"tire} _
•.I If, uar,ullant review:-__it7Q..
nis.�llaneeu• ..
subtotal _ _. _•
10TAL FFIS ifIsSv _
date Paid fyj_,/�[
reeelpf ► Z-Y Vy_
,J
Rice Creekwater
3565 LfxIHGTON AVENUE NORTH SUITE 111/
ARDEN HILLS MINNESOTA 55112
TELEPHUNf 1612) 46' 063'
January 31, 1985
Mr. Dave Brellenthin
Davies Water Equipment Company
4010 Lake Breeze Avenue
lis Minnesota 55429
e0ald of 14814194AO
ReQuNi MNI"s
ind And AI•. Wednesdays
AI AA111 "All Gry Him
90h1uE TOWE Admen Ass I
Minneapo
of Lot 2.
Re: Prog��amM LandilstcAdditton9 Ohs proposed
located the northwest
2.
Quadrant of the Intersection of Highway Avenue and 1-35W In hounds Y1ew
Dear Mr. Brellenthin:
Receipt is acknowledged of your letter with attached dory of the Preliminary
plat of Progranmed Land 1st Addition.both
tundated
onversattonsdwlthuyou�ary l6k
1985. Based on our renew of Permit approval, as
appears that none of the conditions which would require
identified in the RCWD pemleasenberin(ormedSheet
thatrevise
permitansanotlrequiredefrom
at the site. Therefore. D
the District for the proposed development of this lot.
'f you have any questions, please contact us at 473-4224.
Very truly yours,
EWENE A. HICKOK AhO ASSOCIATES
Engineers for the District
Steven G. Miller, P.E.
crs �;bl
cc: Board of Managers S
RCWO District office
F. Murray
City of Mounds Vlew
DUAND 01 AAnA1.! AS
t I KING l u•+.OI I SII
DUNE N HARSTAO
AJ CARDINAL. SA MW.dQAI�As,r.Kel"d
I
aLO awmaamaws
Rf:WiLll'I'UIN No. I'/4-8h
PITY OF 140IINOS VIEII
ClioNI'Y nF HAMSI'Y
StAI'E (Jr MINNI.StrIA
Rtc iAMENIIA'rloN m rM►: I -I I'Y Cf)llNCI:. REGARDING MOUNDS VIEW
11I.ANNING VASE NO. IM'.-tlb, If Rllr'1Hul.l•11N
Wt1F.RGAN, Hruve Holton has requested City approval to
rend nn•t a self -serve car wash in the City of Mounds View
At 211'1 Pnelraal Avnnuwl and
W1trRCA5,•nnrt reef ion of Phis fa.•ilitY, as requested,
tt,quiros approval It flit. dt.vt•luprm.•nt; and
WHFRF.A4, the Planninq Commission has reviewed the
nl.rfl n•p.rt .end rev l.•wo.1 inlr m.rt inn nuhmir t.•.f by the
aplll lr'arlt which inrlud,•s flit, Ind 1"winti:
1. Ilevolopment Plan
2, site Survey
3. Evidence nt site Control; and
' WHEREAS, the Planninq Commission has also reviewed
this plopomal anti it is in conformance with all chapters of
the Municipal C"'Ie, specifically Chapters 40, 421 49, and
49A and State Statutes; and •
WHEREAS, this development will he reviewed and
Approved by the Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) prior
to (,onstruction;
WHEREAS, the storm water control will be apprnved by
the City F.r.gineer prior to City Council approval; and
WHEREAS, the applicant's proposal satisfies vehicle
tackinq requirements of the .city Code;
s
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View
Planning Commission recommends approval of the request by
Bruce Holton;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a developmentagreement
be entered into between the City and the developer which
includes the followin(l:
1. Exhibits:
a) Site, Gradino and
b) Development Plan
c) Site Survey
d) Legal Description
e) Ordinances No. 49A
bnn'1 of $1 , 00
utility Plan
7-Year Performance
Mounds View Planning Commission
Resolution Nn. 154-86
Page Two of Two
f) Buildinn Plans and Specifications
q) Landscaping Plan
2. Security for the development in an amount to be
determined.
3. Exhibit 2A to require the following:
a) Paved parking area to use H-6-18 vurbinq.
b) Concrete cross curb and qutter shall be
installed at the entrance and the exit.
c) Payment of all City expenses above and beyond
amounts previously submitted.
d) Other items as may be required by the City
Council.
e) A light shall also be installed on the east
side of the building. The light shall not
shine onto the exit ramp.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning
Commission rerommends that a ronditional use permit he
granted which includes the above items and the following
items:
1. Trees and shrubs shall he properly maintained.
2. Garhage cans and trash shall he located inside
the trash enclosure.
3. If the business Hosea and in not renpened within
one year, the conditional fse permit It null and
void.
4. An attendant shall he on duty f-ir a minimum of 4
hours per day. If there In a health, safetY,
welfare or nuisanro problem, the number of hours
an attendant is on duty shall be revised by the
City.
BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning
Commission dire.:Ls staff to forward Lhis tvaulution to the
City Council prior to approval of the minutes.
ATTEST:
(SEAL)
Adopted this Sth day of March, 1986.
Chairmen
Director of Public Works/
Community Development
��� /--,.
1,1 .Jj1.U1 IuN NO, I'+n, ..
CITY OF MOUNW, VI1.0
COUNTY OF RAA".y
STATE OF MI NNLWfA
APPROVING JUST AND CMF:CT
C1ALti AW Marc 11 Ciii VU
"'NL"
WFfEREAS, the City Cuullcil of Mounds Vier, pursuant to
Minnesota Statutes 412.241, hits full authority over the financial effajrs
of the City and;
WKERUL, 1-he City Cuuncil has reviewed the clulm:. nwnber`;
, ]Lnn tnrOut;h 174dtl
11, Llu 411k)WIL of
t 7489 throuCh LL
fn ac luWullt of S 1n.4h'Ly�
through Sit, the amount of 3
1 yl 7h 197511
through _ in the a100ant of
TOTAL AMOuNf OF CLAIMS PRESEN111) E 47,140•82
and has found said claims to be Just and correct;
(list of any exception)
NOW IHIREFONE, be it resolved Lhr.t the City Council Of Vier
hereby approved the attrehed lists of claims dated ____ by i
he
vote ayes nayes
ATTEST:
( SEAT. )
Mayor
rrk-AMdn strnt�r
4
I:NECNS
17489
17490
17491
17492
17497
17494
17495
17496
AMl1UNT
S 45.43
bil.75
10.00
197.05
767.71
8,716.50
92.80
10.20
$10,467.44
ADDITIONAL NKESSANY I:EI'tA UI 1V NES
CLAIMANT
Tandy Iw'ather
Deyuty vegiyr r,r
Michael pmerey
L M C I T
Northern States Power
Spring Lake Park Fire Dept.
Fidelity 6 guaranty
Minnesota Mutual I,ile
PUNPOSE
supplies
supplies
professional ervices
insurance
electricity
grant; 6 subsidies
insurance
insurance
01716E
arCct.ti?
jt•
G17472
'..CC
01747�
.:�7.eG
�1!
C17a�♦
7C.CC
C17475
'7.tiC
•
C1717t
iii.(f
��'
017477
2cocc
J'
M•
C17476
ZC.cr
• �
01101i
1#03.4?
49
0174a0
23e.ct
f If017491
••1
0114ei
2l.(L
0174e4
li.4c
6111a:
fc
•b;
0174r.t
4, 7
4ee
17
I*t( 1..5
2r714.tC
`.3►41P.33
PUB FvtLYa rrUW ASSrc r•1651:.�f
[rGT• if t!ilYf{
MAT INATI TICKETS ♦ PFCISTDbTTCM
Crlrf. 7 rtf. i TICFFT' • rlflfTGAT'.r"'
I. I(' "i-,,TATICwtT; • aFrISTaAYU9f
ANCKA CTY LA6 FrF"T Wif TaA1vIMC
ARL4A (TV LAY .,.t•:• T:•' •.Gif16C
FvF tIfLI; . TGrt• • rC F4F%Ir0,:
SFLFCT TFAVF( 1KC COW FFAF{'CF5
l 1. T1 ilV VCLLFTACY A T fT rrtf FrtNffS
PICHELL1 S :' Gtro A► lol p(CTcat
PICrF51 CF(Ititan SiFVIfF CCPV 5001 IFS
:TaSY �TGtF eAM. rF SALAG1f•r 6FLLLe:
ANG—SALAWD SYTFMP♦PAPT T1•E
AMC—COMPF► FFf,LLAP
AMC—PACGAAr 1wt'Pl•CTCt`
frPT. Ca F►OLCYFF GGL. r-...171..
PLP EPPLTF aFT6°MT ASSU PFl`SICPS
NFCFSSAQV FxFFFCITUPES SI«CF LAST COL4CTL 'EETINr
•�G10116 051 gift .f•0;s-TflfrhpNf
u
C:.iTi .I'4:of( IfYfvr", t:r.rl•.
C14011 IC.CC AFFOIC♦A LINIR YLv;tV Cf CLfAfING—TCVFt5 ♦ RRCS
I C191T9 1C1.51 IPkRICRN OFICF $PC(. 1,13c CFFICF SUPPLTF-C
i
a•_ flf'c"L :1'.:.. clF=:,: AT '. Y'.Ir .. .r ...f. tcllf !A(.
Ci91el 30t.GC 4fSETS TfNRCAAST SERV S► WIFSOFNr♦►IPT TINE
C191RI 71.56 CAPITAL ftkCli[Ntts RM INSr FCCTrrFKT
•' CISIb] ?[[.�7 -'. I'l .;c?� f:f�l•1'fi jf (i1:�h; A(
�L
"I b193e4 .9G.CC CCNTPR'I CLfANINC JANITC4 Sr-RVICF
0191e; 1056c.CC CCIPCRITF Plsr PPnfCEP: INSLPINCF ♦ ICNCT
r.
n' Cl�ltt lc.i` ['ifF'�) I•C `6FPllf�r VFNI(IE
C191e1 91.SC cVS TEAS VFIP UPIFCRPS ♦ M TPINC
619141 19C.67 EL PIRNETINf SUP►LIESPCRE�/TJPG
tnf—CTH( FvUr'511141L ,FoV
C1�1ES ill.:': FLF[TF!'_ •fli.c <.Fof j�f :rrllPsr FCL'IP►FrT
' G1919C 1C3.7! EIIEGLT[NE fGUIPFNT
C191ti1 :3C.iC (ITT _F FcICIfY CCILfCT1�fS-QThYP +CCTf
Ci419i 1.7t W 6!(AfLr !f-C SLPPLTFSr VFPICLI
�[ C19191 3♦174.41 GCFNER ELECTRIC REP.♦ ILUS ♦ (F UND!
1i- C14194 1GC.uC o! V1 T;Pff If f <I YYI�E rro-F(PFNCFS
•, C1914! 4fi.i5 Y . CYflr•.!• (•C `LFPLTf!rCPcaAtjtr
ak[—f1/rl1ESf t1C64♦f•RNCS
14196 4000c.ce I• c S 1S00ALT CC. SOPLI1sP SIPIETS
��• 019147 111.<c ,, ( :'.tr <L.rtr 'Uirll(Sr fCl'IrNfnt
n• ;—'t PPllk>r VfY'IfIF
;aloe 21.1C 3C): 0-0pfol Sh/PlifSrC/FRRTIN6
Iv9 jc.•4 Llhc�' 'I, vOFITC'r V«Tf'lf
iSluC ;7.r7 llttI+ k r lflft NrT1Cff
G
:ID
0
llrr (.
�'. ChfL•
40 0192c 1
Cl�i i
C19i.:
C' 0192C4
0197(.:
T!y 019207
�< 019204
C192C0
C1921C
��• 019211
C19212
019213
019214
asult
•�'� 919217
�.• u1921 a
Ofl21 c
��� ONttC
019l21
r'
C19272
G192i 3
,I 1!"
4±.
flfllNC 09rCltTS
� F ' r 1
ANG•56►P1I,Sr OICC�•Cvfr�
OS.nC
r[r.fr inf
SlPFl1ESr fCl'Ivri►T
49.Ce
PCLitt! Yfe► CLP Cnn f•rtoF
SL'PPLI15r FGLIO►FNT
ANC-SLP►LTf5rCPS0ATTNG
AT.r—$UPPLIIS/ FLW*r#NCI
t'-C—el llf l►GT • STOCC Tt OY$
...74
f-f-F rr;e(%ATIri
:LiYIIF'rriEQA1TAG
t•19.7e
N Y @Fit TFLCVkCAE CC
fGNMUMIfATTOMS-TEIFInU►f
3r277.3C
CITY r! hfb OFFrhTro,
SALAr!i S• 9r1i'Mc
2090c
nC:TI-F:N h[Lrlk(
IufrtlfSp cr•(IrrFAT
15Cr00
CrnALO VALLEY
rILFAOF
45C169
PCw[f Farr#.5 [,f.(P I+C (LFrLIF(r^AFfATTfC
171.i.
61TAL CPr►f
Q f r t n r
we edt
fAPSEY CC01TY TAEASLOFO TPAFFIC S1001W - FISCT
AnC-cNCy OlQy1V6-SANCFkr
52.EC
fCAf OlnnFO
rTfff Porfr'cTrfAt $f0Y
14C.CC
PAP PCSE
SALAPIISrTFIIF•vAPT TIOF
231.75
ST PALL AAC %tL,000
TICPE15 • FFSISTPATICAS
364.5�
C.
'(f,f(Wr FCITrPFkT
709.5C
CITY CF SMCRFVIib
TICrfTS • PFGISTPATTrArS
134.99
IT PAUL ECCN•STATIC►FfY
MFSC r'FFY(i SLPPl1ES
1►t: �.t5
Ti r•rr
PYf �TarY
ANC- 'if f(I1'r YCEIOFF f'T
4.34
Tr LI CCMPA%Y
rf%TAlr FOf I►PF4Y
...f'
L.II, ,,,Ttl' 'T:Tr-•
:. • r('If- Tnr
`1-
.It
Cii/ r
r
r t
:r;•/ . Fen a
r
1•
�•1
Crt
T
l/
e r
• ,I
1912•
3.E5
11r1A: 'lfilr:(
'trPllr'r °lfY'••tPA'^S
1e+2;
11•..'
re T. r1
Ql�a: (,'
t..11
.'<I '..'t r)r �• t
� 1 f G1�'ll rl.
4
�19ttT
:c.CO
tiV •rt lGePiF
oA[feAl. IASTRICTCR?
!�
i
1922t
r`.C;
tit. tt°ilrt
r rf�;t•- ^t''IfT�r tSnCr
�I
Its
...
r+e ..rtI'
rtcCSllftitrlrr i'ttf
_014215
61923C
SOCOOC
OfG,04(L Cr( 1S:CNSr TNC
CT►Fi PRCFWtlC1tJt SFRY
•�
•
r..0
oil 'l tlri �f
rG If Tiff.
� •
19112
&lC.CC
r rr,i•. ifNTFC
GCIIPpfAI
4149271
1191wO
L : C f Pi RCf At r Ir iN•"
SUFPIIFSrf►FRATT%;
i
19234
'1S17C
•t T:i It .4
.f PLlfc rr Pfrr Tlrr
I° •
C1913;
2F.:�
(tiCF lslia
c t f t r f
—_--
1
!•
lvt3t
17000
JNK eRu►eJC°
F f F L A r
19237
11.Cf
tiij5 ►(rt1 f
P i F l A[
•
C1923e
933,cc
Na :LPLGFtb ffV ri-t•1 f.
(eJwTS • •,IPSIf1iS
_- .y
101�23�
2C•CO
JOMN F IFIC L r$!(Cr The
WKS • FFRICCICJLS
01924C
13.`C
3-1 i1'CSOW 1, '.tlf /Sf•V
SuFIIIf�r FOlI1Yf*T
.
C19241
144.FC
Cltif C' f.TFlrT'c : ',.P11
SLPillfrrriff�Ti`0
_��
T
�i01it•t
I1.N
Cf11fRsr" CC•r 111C
SL'FIIIESr IICES•CGNOS
—
r1 N ^ r. rr;Cl
I Al c;r .r . FL.c
crrkt • Pf Rlrrlr rt<
._....�.�-
.�
019t••
a�[.h(
IAiIJf• LrrCkllU1•:• IAi
rThic WFO",V(.31 cr°V
i
O1oi0D
3t.CC
TPCPFS ALTO"
firfUNOl
�
'
01914t
rllpl,.rr
:rrtrlr�
014,47
tit.::
:rr T .,.•rtr
1ftfV5
+,
.�
d14Y�0
S:.cC
v1r1Nt lltCliTr•lc'r INC
SCFPIIGtrrPF°1fiN6
rr
i
°rtk; 1 Pr•ICrlfilr
01425C
trf.ttr ..•ntt.'
rl;r cflCr 'trFlif'
G
7
Ciltrr. M6TT14A
a.
TLTJI i
:s .�ftn`.
I.I.I trt)?.:•
MEMO TO, clnrk-Administrator and Cites Council
PROM: Dirertor of Puhlir Works/Community D,rvolopment
DATRt March 5, 1986
SUBJECT: PARK KNOLLS SECOND AUDI'rioN, MANOR SUBDIVISION
(2 LOTS INTO 6 ZERO LOT LINE LOTS)
Attached please find the following:
1. Summary of Is4uns rnlatinq to the construction of a single
family house or tern lot I vnr hou:n-":.
2. Park Knolls drainagn area -
Item No. it indicates that staff's opinion is that the
subdivision meets all City Codes. Item No. 12 indicates
that the Planning Commission states that the subdivision
meet, all City codas no the Planninq Commission
recommends approval.
The Park Knolls drainagn area MAP indinAtos the area of
land that contribnt�s water to the proponud storm rater
detention pond. Approximately half of the drainaqe area
or the proposed detention pond is on the property to the
west of the proposed subdivision.
The subdivider indicated that a cross-section of the site
will he submitted by noon on Thursday. It the
cross-,eption is submitted on time, it will be included
with this memn.
SWT/ham
PARK KNOIA.S SECOND ADDITION
SUMMARY OF ISSUES RF.LA'rIN(; rO 'mr
CONS-rRucrl0N OF A SINGLE FAMILY
HOUSr OR ITRO I.Or LINE HOUSES
SINGLrF FAMILY ZERO LOT
ISSUE I HOUSE LINE LOTS
1. 7.nning tR -'I R-2
2. Minimum (Min.) Width
Interior Lot
Corner Lot
3. Min. Lot Site
Interior Lot
Corner Lot
4. Setback Requirements
lin feet)
Front, Rack, Side
5. Deed Restrictions
6. Subdivision
7. Hearing Notices
8. Development Agreement
75' 50' per house
100' 50' per house
11,000 sq. ft. 6,250 sq. ft.
per house
12,500 sq. ft. 6,250 sq. ft.
per house
30, 30, 10 130, 30, 10
None Per City Code
Chapter 40.11,
;Subd. C(4)
4inor Major
(I lot into 2) (2 lots Into 6)
IPublish in news- Publish in news-
paper only paper and mail to
property owners
within 350 feet
lof site
Not Required per (Required
City Code Chapter
59.07, Subd. 2
9. Storm Water Detenrinn
Not Required prr Requir•,'.
Pond City Code Chapter
149A.02, Suhd. I
0
- 2 -
-------------
-------------
ORDINANCE NO. 403
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COIINTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
AMENDING THE. MUNICIPAL CODE OF MOUNDS VIEW BY AMENDING
CIIAPTER 40 ENTITLED, "ZONING"
The Council of the City of Mounds View does hereby
ordain:
SECTION I. The following shall be added to Chapter
40.04:
Subdivision T. Satellite Dish Antennas. The instal-
lation of satellite dish antennas in R-1, R-2 and R-5,
Pesidential Districts, shall meet the following require-
ments:
(1) The maximum dish diameter shall be 12 feet.
i2) A dish with a diameter larger than 3 feet shall
not be installed on any structure, building,
garage or accessary buildinq; but shall be ground
mount.'d .
(3) A dish shall not he installed in a front yard or
side yard.
(4) The location of a dish shall satisfy buildinn
setback requirements of City Code Chapter 40.05,
Subd. C, and solar sky space easement requirements
of City Code Chapter 40.04, Subd. D.
(5) The total height of the installation shall not
exceed 15 feet.
(6) A building permit is required prior to installa-
tion.
(7) The installation shall comply with Cedpral
Commication Commission regulations.
Subdivision U. Installation of Satellite Dish Antennas
in other Zoning Districts shall meet the following require-
ments:
ii The locatiun of a dish shall sAricfv building
setback requirements of City Code Chapter 40.05,
Subd. C, and solar sky space easement requirements
of City Code Chapter 40.04, Subd. D.
ORDINANCE NO. 403
PAGK TWO OF TWO
(2) A building permit is required prior to
installation.
13) The installation shall comply with federal
Commication Commission regulations.
SECTION 11. This ordinance shall take effect thirty
(30) days after the date of its publication.
Read by the Council of the City of Mound% View on this
day of , 1986.
Passed by the Council of the City of Mounds View this
day of , 1986.
ATTEST:
Mayor
(SEAL)
Clerk-Administraror
APPROVED AS r0 FORM:
ty Attorney
MEMO TO: Clerk -Administrator and City Council
fFROM: Director of Public Works/Community Development 7
DATE: March 6, 1986
SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 83-60 WITH STAR 40MES, LTD.
The developer has satisfied all requirements of Development
Agreement No. Ui-bU• Staff. recommends release of the contract
bond. The developer constru.:ted 2 double bungelows. One
bdat
ungelws7lo atedWat oodlaw2/44 woodlawn Drive and the other is
SWT/bac
RESOLUTION NO. 1982
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STA'rr OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING RELEASE OF THE CONTRACT
BOND FOR DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 83-60
WITH STAR HOMES, LTD.
WHEREAS, the Developer, Star Homes, Ltd., submitted a bond
in the amount of $2,000.00 as required by Deveopment Agreement
No. 83-60 for the construction of two double hungelows at 7642/44
and 7646/48 Woodlawn Drive; and
WHEREAS, Development Agreement No. 83-60 Was signed on
June 13, 1983; and
WHEREAS, the Develper has completed construction rf the
two (2) double bungelow dwellings; and
WHEREAS, the Developer has requested release of the bond,
and
WHEREAS, the Developer has completed the requirements of
Development Agreement No. 83-60;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Mounds View authorizes release of the contract bond
for Development Agreement No. 83-60.
Adopted this loth day of March, 1986.
A1"rEST:
(SEAL)
Mdy.,r
Clerk -Administrator
CITY of MOUNDS VIEW
CITY C.OUNC11.
AGENDA SESSION
MARCH 17, 1986
7:00 P.M.
1. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding 1986 1.eaque
of Minnesota Cities Annual Conference
2, Consideration of Staff Memorandum RegarAing F.nergY
Coordinator's Salary
3. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding 1986 Sala:Y
Structure
4. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding Teamster's
Loral 320 (Police) Tentative Contract Agreement
um
5 Consideration
Non-UnionMpolicedoff.icersd ng Uniform
6. Continued Discussion of gH6xihle AgendaSpending
Account
Sexsion
Proposal frum March 3, 1
7. Consideration of Staff Mrm,irandum Regarding M��m bershin
' in the National Associatir.n for the Exchange of
Industrial Resources
8. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding Status of
1985 Water and Sewer Fund Contingencies for Main Breaks
and Repairs
9, Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding Water and
Sewer Maintenance
10. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding Reduction°
in Assessed Property Valuation of Century Motor Freight
11. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding Telephone
Equipment Lease - Purchase Agreement
12 CountyeWaste nManagementMFeesa nemornduCity gProperty of Staf
13. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regar,11n9 Planning
Case No. 183-86, MTC Park and Ride Facility
11. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding Planning
Case No. 185-86 Self -Service Car Nash
15. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regardinq Insurance
Requirement, for Licanand Cnntractors
AGENDA SESSION
MARCH 17, 1986
PAGE 'rWu
16. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Reqardinq No Parkinq
on North Side of County Road H-2
17. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Reqardinq Street
Sveepinq puotes
18, Consideration of Staff Memorandum Reqardinq Cnlorine
Equipment for Water Treatment Plant No. 1
19 Consideration of Staff
fnntrol
ffndum Reqardinq Bids for
Well No. I
20. Consideratinr, of 1986 Storm Water and Wetland Management
Plan
21. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Reqardinq Car Wash
Contract for Police Squad Cars
I
I
11
r UNArMuku
P RUCLLD INi.:; i11 1 H I - �I11 I :,
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA
Regular Mrctimi
March 10, 1986
Mounds View City Hal:
2401 Hwy. 10, Mounds View, MN 5511.:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Tne
by
Mounds View City Council
Mayor Linke at 7:10 PM on
was called to order
March 10, 1986.
1. Order to
Call
The
Pledge of Allegiance was
said.
1. Pledge of
Allegiance
MEMBERS PRESENT: Councilmembers Haake, Blanchard, 3. Roll Call
Quick and Mayor Linke.
It was noted Councilmember Hankner was absent.
ALSO PRESENT: City Attorney Meyers, Clerk/Admini-
strator Pauley and Public Works/Community Development
Director Thatcher.
Motion/.Second: Haake/Linke to approve the February 4. Approval o'
24, 1986 minutes as corrected. Minutes:
March 24, '986
4 ayes 0 nays Motion carried
Bill Frits, 8072 Long Lake Road, asked if something Residents
could be done with the probler.. of joggers who do not Requests and
wear light colored clothing and run in the streets Comments frort
at dusk, as they are very difficult to see.
the Mayor Linke replied Staff should put an article in
the next newsletter regarding safety.
Motion/second: Quick/Haake to approve the consent 6. ApprovConsent nda
agenda, as presented, and waive the reading of the g"
resolutions.
Motion Car led
4 ayes 0 nays
Motion/Second: Haake/Quick to accept the recommenda- 7. ofnsideratil ,or
Lion of the crvi
ivil Service Commission to promote David Commission
Brick to the position of Police Lieutenant and Jerome Recommendation
Johnson and Reed Krogh to the position of Patrol
Sergeant, effective March 15, 1986.
'arrird
4 ayes 0 nays
MUunds Frew uty Council bNA
APffinl
n t Ok March 10, 1966
Regular Meeting V Page Two
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Attorney Meyers stated he had had an opportunity to
work with David Brick over the years, as well as with
Mr. Johnson and Mr. Krogh and felt all three of them 10
were excellent choices for promotion.
Mr. Kremer stated he would like to build a double
8. Consideration
bungelow on the property to best utilize the land.
of Spring lake
He stated he understands the Police Department has
Park Knolls
checked the area and not found a parking problem,
Major Sub -
and the other remaining issue to address is drainage,
division
which he plans on working on with the City to
resolve.
Jim Tobiason, 7601 Groveland Poad, stated he was
opposed to the development and was concerned about
his lot gp�ting the drainage and run-uff from the
property in question.
Bruce Wolfe, 7685 Groveland Road, presented copies of
two letters to the Council, which Clerk/Administrator
Pauley read, with both stating they were opposed to
the development of the property.
Councilmember Haake stated her objections still stand,
as to the parcel being developed with a double bungalow,
concerning drainage, packing and the high intensity
usage.
Motion: Haake to request Staff and the City Attorney
to draw up a resolution to deny the request for the
subdivision for Spring Lake Park Knolls, for considera-
tion at the next regular Council meeting.
The motion died for lack of a second.
Motion/Second: Quick/Blanchard to approve the
request for a major subdivision for Spring Lake Park
Knolls.
3 ayes 1 nay
Aoticn Carried
Councilmember Haake voted against the motion.
Considerable discussion took place before the vote
was taken. Councilmember Blanchard stated she had
put considerable thought into it and is basing her
decision on the fact that the land is zoned for
multiple dwelling, and she realizes the water is a
big problem, but the City will have control over it
if a duplex is allowed, whereas they would not have
control if a single family home is constructed there.
Mounds View City COunciU / March 10, 1986
Regular Meeting �kvl �� P a Page Three
----------------------------------------------------------
Mayor Linke stated that he has researched the request
and cannot find a legal reason for denial. He added
that after reviewing the plans, ne feels the wdtdt
situation will be taken care of, and he noted that
parking problems are experienced all over the City,
and they will have to monitor it.
Attorney Meyers ncted the applicant will have to
receive approval from the Rice Creek Watershed
District, as well as follow other controls, so
the City will have some control over how the lot
is developed.
Director Thatcher presented an overhead of the site,
showing the planned drainage system and the existing
drainage. He added the capacity is more than
sufficient to handle a hundred year storm.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reviewed Staff's 9. Considerat.orl
recommendation for the purchase of computer to Purchase
Computer
equipment. Equipment
Motion/Second: Quick/Blanchard to authorize the
Mayor and Clerk/Administrator to enter into contracts
' with Computoservice, Inc. for the purchase of a Texas
Instruments 890 Data Processing System at a cost of
$79,835 and software at a total cost of $44,545,
including training and modifications contingent upon
approval of final contract language by Management
Advisors, Inc, and the City Attorney's office.
Motion Carricd
4 ayes 0 nays
Second Reading
Director Thatcher explained the ordinance covers 10. and Adoption
the installation of satellite dish antennas in of Ord. No. 40-1
the City.
Motion/Second: Haake/Quick to have the second
reading and adoption of ordinance No. 40?, amending
the Municipal Code of Mounds View by amending
Chapter 40 entitled, "Zoning", and waive the
reading.
Councilmember Haake - aye
Councilmember Blanchard - aye
Councilmember Quick - aye Motion Carried
Mayor Linke - aye
'
Motion/Second: Haake/Blanchard to approve Reso- 11. Considerdtionof Rslt. 1)8[
lution No. 1981, authorizing release of the contract
bond for Development Agreement No. 83-60 with
Star Homes, Ltd. and waive the readinq.
Mntio,. Carrit d
4 ayes 0 nays
Mounds View City CounTrOVEMarch 10, ]9No
Regular Meeting M
�page Four
tj N'
Director Thatcher had no report. 12. Report of
Public Wo;
community pt.
Attorney Meyers reported he had received notice 13. Report of
from the Clerk of Appellate Court, in favor of Attorney
a judgement of $998.50 for the City in the Greg
Johnson case, for out of pocket expenses. He
added he has submitted to the District Court an
amended finding on the home occupation issue.
Attorney Meyers reported he has had discussion
with the attorney for the Fire Department
regarding their contract, and it :s his opinion
that they are the same as an independent contractor
and should provide insurance coverage as any
other independent contractor would.
Councilmember Haake had no report. 14. Reports of
Councilmember Blanchard had no report. Counc:lmemters
Councilmember Quick had no report.
Mayor Linke reported he had ridden with the Polrce •
Department on March 8th and found it very interest-
ing. He reported they had responded to a fire
call and was concerned about the amount of manpower
that was called out.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported the City had 15. Report of
received an application on March 7th for the Clerk/
transfer of the liquor license for Loose Ends, Administrator
and they have received the required $5,000 surety
bond. He stated he will be requesting the Police
Chief to start an investigation, and asked the
Council to set a public hearing on the .Matter.
Motion/Second: Quick/Blanchard to set a public
hearing for 7:05 PM on April 14, 1986 to consider
the request of transfer for the Loose Ends liquor
license.
4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carrie:l
Clerk/Administrator eauley reported he had just
received notice on the Ramsey County League of
Local Governments annual banquet on March 19, and •
asked the Council to let him know if they would
like reservations made.
UNAP,
O!^{
March
10, 1986
Mounds
View City
CounciOvF
[ y'
ageive
Regular
-------------------------------------
Meeting
iiiwww»>...rrr -------------------
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported problems have
been experienced recently at Simon's Liquors, and
_., ..t a hrarinq to discuss them.
asKeU li,c �J uL...He added a formal report will be forthcoming from
Staff.
Motion/Secund: Vuirk/Blanchard to set a hearinq for
March 24, 1986 at 7:10 PM to discuss Simon's
Liquors.
4 ayes 0 nays
The meeting was adjourned at 8:06 PM.
Respectfully submitted,
Donald F. Pauley,
Clerk/Administrator
Motion Cacricd
16. Adjournment
��m i
MEMO TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNC
FROM: CLt:RK-ADMIN[STRA'fOR
DATE: MARCH 11, 1986
SU9JECT: 19S6 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CI'flt:S ANNUAL.
CONFERENCE
Attached please find copies of the conferenre registration
form and housing registration form for the 1986 League of
Minnesota Cities Annual Conference which will ho held on
Tuesday, June 17 through Friday, June 20 in Duluth. Since
it has been my experience that rooms can become extremely
sparse during conferences of this type, it has been the
practice of the City to submit registrations as early as
possible. Therefrre, Staff would request that Council
advise which member will be attendinn this conFerence in
order that reservations for housing and registrations can be
submitted for both the Councilmember and myself.
CFP/mjs
Attachment:
1986
League of Minnesota Cities
Annual conference
June 17-20, 1986
Duluth, Minnesota
Because of federal and state revenue
cutbacks cities need to cut services
and reduce spending, and face a
future with fewer sources
of
revenues. The 1986 topics
�irence
a
program makes those op
matter of immediate importance
City officials wilt gather
port city of Duluth on June 17-20,
for the 72nd LAC Annual
Conference, at the Duluth Areoa-
Auditorium. Duluth is rolling out the
red carpet and is looking forward tO
ho@;ing a marvelous sequel to the
'84 City Night, with an evening in
the environs of Grandma's Saloon,
along with a fine program of
activities for families and guests.
This event will give city officials a
chance to have fun after they attenu
the day''s workshops.
insurance and liability issues,
perspectives on council
I effectiveness, changing roles of
1 volunteer fire departments, federal
and state budget cuts, an elected
Officials' training series, and a forum
on risk management and how to
guard against litigation will all be a
part of conference proceedings•
More yet is on the agenda as city
officials look at Fair Labor Standards
requirements, cable television, the
impact of federa-1 tax polio! on
economic developmert. Ptn'2tization
and contracting for services, and city
celebrations -
The will also
The conference Program
directly address the deepening farm
crisis, and how the serious economic
issues in non-metropOlitan areas will
affect cities.
Be sure to complete the housing
reseration form and the conference
registration in this issue of the
magazine and watch for further
details on the program in future
issues. The April and May issues Of
Minnesota Cities will contain more
information on the conference. ■
MN k teas
LMC QUA-
CONFERENCE HOUSING
1986
Houring Information
SINGLE
E ,
ptl�a)
$58 00
jStl.W
Ramaapn Hotel DulWia sc% W's' "s..rvrc Street
NW,d,) Inn Duluth. A)7 W'est hup mr htreet
tVt m
$40.00
i56 tiU
315.00 3&r4 adds[
Duluth Haabur lam. 250 South Furst Avenue East
Motels. 211I luntmat Road
350. W
ibl W
110 W
$7A.1e1 . 35/Wlesde
Edgewater
Edgr" Inn, Mtu Eaal Superior Stkreel
FilgD.,...11— Het wool(tm. 131 Wet trrd Sheet
$26 00
$25.00
IIM W l Ilea addd
335.W isles atkd
Tmel He»L Interstate 350 27th Avenue O"t
VA 00
3aU.W jVea widii
Yrryagru+ At.:tel, 3 ° East `wprnor Street
Note The Rsd.sxwl Duuth m the Headquarters Hotel.
EARLY BLRD SPECIAL. wale. Mules Wul each provde one rompltmrntary weekend la
For member
olll s only The Ramsvm Duluth HobdaY Inn i Ond W) drkgates wrd" m It" housing repatramn lam b) may 1.
r m
tWo It thew (&Ldlues. eachAng mesh, as an early bud specW Pn
IM6 wll be ektpde The winner most pay the room Wand ill w+alental charges
o pORTANT INSTRUCTIONS
mate your reseafter WtWh regdar roan rstes tvdl Ue m effect on
komm ntg be rearved on a 6nrtiomr. first served bassi d
The earlier your Mtons. the boner the chatar You will have o
FtW4 your list chore hotel. The hotels will hold room "oaks .ay "" lone 3, lgg6.
an as avai b* bash. - s must br paYaWe ro I!dC
t Ind"Ind"per rwm must xcumpany Uus housing form �remt card prekrred. L'hn'k
A depose equal to ante rug", ''
Housing
You wil recelve an Kkwwledgrmem of yuur rrxn'atun from the Gough the
H, ranterd !uY for late
All ch..Vs m reaenationa a causcellstnuna must be made through the Housing ill be b m pled%nubyig hone kr lNa
&oval. room deposes will be rehuded d rexrvatams are �awelled No rrsrnauuro will be rated by phone.
HOUSING RESERVATION •
(pleaw pnnl or type)
Cna apmaum ---- .�—
Add" tw
ckr -- Soo,
Arnva' Date — -
Armal Tnrc IkpMWe Date _
Hotel Prekreae
xcoM
Fuse--�
59enal ReWurmeoo
Nupea of Al (k.upams
Do You "It to guarantee pay
IV arM i after 6.00 P. m
Y No ual to one rught s J djft Per
_ncbsed u a deposa eq
(Creme Card Preferred)
U,w of Muutesou Cones Housing bureau
Radown Duluth Hotel
505 West Superior St.
Duluth. Munesuu 5,W2
Attn_ Front Offre Manager
IF PAYING BY CHECK MAKE PAYABLE TO:
LMC HOUSING
Thad
Credo Card Preleard
Credd Card Lompdfn - --
Card Number -
E,Wataon Date
The LMC Hnusaq Bureau u AuthOnaed to n.e
the above card to guarantee my nose;
rewr,atons reserved "Y me. 1 ocdarsural that
one night's room w8 be bdkd thnA0 ours cud
d I sal to slow up for my asatpted housing w •
the rortfirnod date uttkss 1;uk� cancelled hours m
reservauors with the hotel
advance
ManrAgous Cities
14
1986 LMC ANNUAL CONFERENCE
REGISTRATION FORAM
-neral Delegate Registration June 17.20, 1%6 .tom trMal
Adrm:r reyutrauun (before June tit ........... .....' .
cx
Rryutrwtum at jades badge
ad _ .. . .
.... $135-00
kepstratwm 1, ualudrs badge admustun to allq gefletal araaaabrmh wT R" reipmid twtrtw hu naval mr T lt% on the gTHE yrlXn,JR' 4IN
and Than odke. Nrd lurch. Thurs ban,.., and Fri. Itrurah. ell rep•trmwm pp,m NOT I,mrthe THE MATFER NCE
TI...r.A IF VIYI WTh III tYn: have a tKtrt br this lutwhnm. y.w mar dl w m the EXTRA CONFERENCE
auu a;..n ., :: hrne"•y y_ I+n r'wl nu.
MF.AI. TICKETS ,e,twn prluw II r•u .re plaruuntt •m havtnw parr yv Nr.r atrrnd Irwl II. ;.:: p
purchase
rse w, atpuatcud actwsredyeo,an to or prewnted A the 469we reyn....sec JL'A f_ �'�"re .rKrdvwrreutr twlmy,�
yw
ve
Clout Person. — — Teleplamr a -
City ---
r
A _
I
T— -F.r �.�•.— �.t•.�.
i.w
--
Mini-Conference Registration Thursday, June 19 awier total
Ad%mv reytsr-u,un (before June W .. y&i.Otl
Reymtrataori a
Mw'CuNrrrnr rrpwtratwm ter Irw'ludrs badge' regwtratwm roller. and buw!,am II y.w per rcpstrr. ytw wIg ,,erne a pntcud
' tnowledyemwm to be presented at the prepaid regntratwm drslt to fxnkaie speedy repsvanon Muti.Conferene deleamm Who Pam
attend the nturw ay bartytmet akaldd mchme tickets below.
Reptered drielaites to the t.roeral C,*re ce see wekomr to xtrrd Mum C.INrreme srsawms and Ju nu need ru ywrtease sprits'
regntratlnna.
City
P —
A
R
_ - w....
1. -. -. t
�vr
amealc
T Fd %par sew Its,
a / waw
EXTRA CONFERENCE MEAL TICKETS the raw of the
.�mtr
He s �perymfo
elsr
�extra
e tbe kal ttOrderbrlow Miu-Cnnfeme
rwwld r�c� 'e�t 'p,us .umpinrn�a.�rrttsi x
mostration does not include any oeWs e+cW the Thtvaday lurxhevm. t.ual
Number
L•xh+wl Nrdrcda, .. ... ... ....
IN own 9-W
Mayors Lwrc1M'Mw.l.oniewoee Lurch om Thundal
for Wnan-
e.wart Neiday
Ior Whom
•vmh Friday .. -
.r.,n.
TOTAL ADVANCE REGISTRATION ......... .
Seed repatntwn sod peynx"t m Lnk Brody.
I&so& of M,nneaots Chia.. 1143 1 o,emn Are. bast. 11 Pad..M% 551t11
Mate cltacta Payable to: I. ayur of Minnesota Cities l5
March 19"
Federal outlook
FY 1987 Budget
The deepest cuts to cdy pngpam,
history occurred in 1%5, and the trr
continues in the president'sfi,cal )e
1987 budget prop.-4. Tho- budget pro
poses major rnreases m tax ,ubsdos
d in defense. foreign ad. anal on
it
federal debt. On the other hand
calls for ebnnnutaon or sharp reuuctun
Of almost every Cn) program in &at
year 1987. In addnun. funding :drrad)'
approved for some city programs for
fiscal year 1986 would either be
deferred or rescindedose The budget props elimination of
the following programs: revenue shar-
ing. mumcipai wastewater grants.
urban development action grants, the
EconoouC Development Admimstra.
Igin. airport grants. cofmmmn' set
vm block grants. energy consenal."
programs, rental development and
reh+hdnaivm gram, elderly and . m
gregate housing, and section S housing.
Steep reductions are proposed in com
mumty development block grants (in
1986), hghwa)' funding. education, and
public transportation grants t 1986 and
19871. In areas affecting cures, the
budget proposes to
• Cut Community development block
grants 26 percent retroactive to Jam
fury and hold them at the $2.6 billion
level for 1986 and 1987. The prese
dent will propose to change the diva
son of funding between entidemenl
cities and small cities from the cur-
rent 70 laercenu30 percent to 65
percentr35 perrent. to offset the
effect of the proposed elunimtion of
the Farmers Home Admrustratsin
rural housing and development
programs.
• Cut 201 wastewater treatment
grants 25 percent per year and ebm.
mate them by 1990 The expenditure
of funds would bit hinted to ongoing
prgeris
• Emanate urban development action
grants in 1987 and cut currrntyear
funding 66 percent, so that the
awards made in Januan would be the
last ones under the program.
an
ar
• RerIW Y• fundm)• Inr nuhlx' tran,lorla
Ism to $1.22 bill" 62 percent below
levels. The budget proposes a
nil rescrsldd of WI million in fiscal
year 1986 discretionary grants
already approst•d Operating asst.:
ante for all urbanized areas over
200,000 population would bit ebnu-
wed Alin targeted for terrmldixm
are Amtrak subsidies and the car
Carrnr suhsdt pn-knm. whnh wa,
designed to guarantee essential car
service b> sdmg funinmmm5.
• Reduce the 1987 funding for two
major shelter programs, subsidized
housing and low assume operaosns.
by 67 percent from $10.7 billion to
$3 5 billion Current —year funding
would drop to $7 billion. (a 63 per
cent rrdat txmi. to be accomplished
by rescissions and deferrals of funds
already appropriated for housing. The
adminatnoin proposes to requite
state and kraal gu.'rrmtents t'. pa)
half of the administrative costs of the
section 8 existing and housing
voucher programs.
• Reduce by 17 percent the funding for
four )ob training programs —block
grants, summer youth, dislocated
workers. and the job corps as coma
pued to 198ti Levrls. Curren -year
funding would we a rescission of
over $300 million.
• Cancel the Octuber general revenue
sharing payment and terminate the
program on September :N). The final
payment an July would be reduced
about 16 percent.
• Accelerate city payments of Suual
Secunty taxes by putting cities on
the same payment schedule as pn-
vatc businesses and uwreasung the
rate of interest charged on late
deposits of SocW security payments.
Cures would pay the Social Security
system directly nlher than going
!tough a state agem,c a, Ic the
current practice.
General federal aid
• Cut highway funding by $2.6 billion. Sen David Durenberger has intrm
about 15 percent. ducted a bill i5. 2037) which would
by .Aran HoWe
un.vide genoral purpow federal ad t-
local governments The House has
introduced a companion bill (H R.
4085), The new program. targeted
rascal assistance, is a targeted version
4gc n, ral r; wine ,luN,j deanptrd i„
proedr a safety net for needy comn:u
mties. II would provide hurling of $2.3
billion per year. about halt the current
funding Level for revenue sharing. In
eider to reduce hs,al dupantu-,
betweeft high gnome and low tancome
communities, funds would be targeted
tc areas with low per capta Income and
high poverty levels The funding for-
mula would be based on nerd. tax
effort, and fiscal npacin. Cbmrnumor,
with menmey 25 percent above !her
stateaverage would not be eliplaw I�r
the pt ogram
Tax reform
The Senate Finance Comnuttee is
drafting its own tax reform bill. reject
utg huh the admrustraton proposal
and the House -passed mrasute The
Coninullm Wig consider a new con
sumptctn m tax, such as some forof a
national ,ale, tax or a value added tax.
which the adrmmstntion opposes. It
Congress adopts such a tax, it would
interf,re with the ability of state and
local governments to impose sales
taxes and could eliminate state and kxa.
sales !:sees. The Comrruttre wig dis-
cuss the deCucibnb!)' of state and "cat
taxes, although the House has indica!ed
it wit refuse to approve the eumuution
of state and kcal tax deducubihl. The
flounce committee is not expected to
present a ball to the Senate cuaW this
all
The includes
The House version rludes a pro
siun requiring all cities that tax prop
erty. Der. l nrnrorr:•, ,,. v"me !_
provide an udornutsin report to each
ndividual who paid such taxes and to
he IRS Cndeo ;;w proposai. cities
vould be :equred to provide the firs;
dornutgm returns to idiv:dual tax
ayers by the end of Januan, 1988 and
the IRS by the end of February.
988. for taxes pad in 1*7 11
16 Minne•ou Cities
MEMO TO: MAYOR AND CITY COIINC
FROM: CLERK-ADMINISTRATO
DATE: MARCH 11, 1986
SUBJECTt ENERGY COORDINATOR'S FALARY
At the time I submitted recommendations to the City Council
for wages for non -union employees for 1986 I neglected to
submit a recommendation regardinq the Energy Coordinator's
salary during the same time frame. As you recall, we have
continjed this positions until the end of June of 1986 to
allow the City to make preparations for responding to
mandates from the State of Minnesota, Metropolitan Council,
and Ramsey County reaardinq solid waste. In preparing the
budget for this Position, which was previously approved by
the City Council, adequate funds were determined to be
allailable to continue Rita's wage of $8.34 per
rnhour which
view and
she was receiving in 1985 try%m the cit'.'
Blaine. This was a base wage equally
betwarV een
the
two cities of $7.69 per hour p pP
paid
by the City of Blaine in recognitionallinsurance costs this
!! r(ty up �f Mounds View picked up
e, it would be necessary, if [he City
Position. Therefor
wishes to continue the $8.34 wage rate for Rita to adopt
this wage retroactive to January 1 of 1986.
RECOnd
cil authorize
wageMM 34tIler houtaff dfur cthe eEnergy na
Coordinator's
position retroactive to January 1, !9RA-
DFP/m3s
J7/Le, ") 13
MEMO TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCI
FROM: CLERK -ADMINISTRATOR ('
DATE: MARCH 3, 1986
SUBJECT: i986 SALARY STRUCTURE
Attached is a copy of the salary structure for the City's Salary
Administration and Performance Review Program reflecting the
9% across-the-board wage adjustments approved by the City
Council for 1986.
RECUMMENDATION: Staff would recommend the Council adopt the
1986 Salary Structure as presented.
DFP/mks
City of Mounds View
February, 1986
SALARY STRUCTURE.
SUPERVISORY - AUMINISIRA7'!VE - MANAGEMENY PosyrIONS
Responsi-
bility
Percent
Level
.. -one r
7(nr 0
7nnr A
Spread
VilI
$14,000-15,200
$15,201-17,800
$17,801-19,001)
36%
(16,500)
IX
16,200-17,700
17,701-20,900
20,QJ1-22,400
.381
($19,3O0)
X
18,300-20,100
20,I01-23,800
23,801-25,600
40%
($22,000)
XI
21,700-24,000
24,001-28,500
28,501-30,900
42%
(S26,200)
XII
25,200-28,000
28,001-33,500
33,501-36,300
44%
($30,700)
XIII
27,900-31,100
31,101-37,500
37,501-4O,70U
46%
($34,300)
Xlv
31,500-35,300
35,301-42,800
42,801-46,600
48%
($39,100)
XV
34,600-38,900
38,901-47,600
47,600-51,900
50%
($43,300)
♦J
City of Mounds View
February, 1986
SALARY STRUCTURE.
OFFICE POSITIONS
Responsi-
bility
Percent
Level -
Zone C
Zone B
Zone A
Spread
O-I
$ 9,700-10,400
$10,401-11,900
$11,901-J2,600
309
(511,200)
0-II
10,600-11,400
11,401-13,100
13,101-13,900
311
(512,300)
0-II1
11,500-12,400
12,401-14,300
14,301-15,200
320
($13,300)
0-IV
12,800-13,800
13,801-16,000
16,U01-17,000
33%
(514,900)
O-V
14,000-15,200
15,201-17,600
17,601-18,800
34%
($16,400)
0-11I
15,400-16,700
16,701-19,500
19,501-2O,800
35%
($18,100)
0-VII
17,000-18,500
18,501-21,600
21,601-23,100
361
($20,100)
A
��ln»
MEMO 31I: MAYOR AND "I1'Y (")I 'I I.
FROM: CLCRR-A DM IN I SI'R YI'oR
UArv: MARCH II, 1986
SUBJECT: T1l:AMsrER9 LOCAL 12U (POLICE) 'ft:Nl'Ai1VH CONTRACT
A WR FMY.NT
As hag been mentioned in pr••vious Adminitilr.,tiv-
Nowsletters, Staff has been negotiatinq a settl,•mvnt of the
1986 Labor Agreemen� between the City of Mound-. View and
'rcr,m^tors ror,il 12C reprrsentinn the cirios unionized police
I.n r.•.
A tentative acreement between Staff and the Union has been
reached containing the follnwinn
provisions-
L
1. A wage increase of jime and ono -half percent
retroactive to January 1 of 1986. This wage
rate is consistent with that heinq agr,•od upon
by the majority of Metropolitan A,e.n .-hies.
2. An increase of $10.00 per month in the basic
monthly insurance c,.vrr•ap' prr,vided to emP1,,v .•
bringing the total monthly payment to $165.00
per month. This is also consistent with wane
settlements for Metropolitan Area cities.
3. An increase in the monthly supplementary wage
payment for the Investigator position from
$90.00 per month to $100.00 per month. The
$90.O0 per month figure was established as a
result of negotiations for the 1082 Labor
Agreement and Staff felt that an adjustiaont to
$100.00 per month would he appropriate as well
as being consistent with other Metropolitan Area
cities.
1. Current contract language provides that A $30U.00
per year uniform allowance be paid to each member
of the barqaininq unit on a voucher basis. This
has become a bone of contention in that it requires
officers purchase uniforms using their own funds and
receive repayment from the City or chirge them on
accounts previously Arranqed for hetwren the City
and various uniform suppliers in the Metropolitan
Area. Prior to the contract lanquaqe beinq enforced
it had been the past practice of the City to give
each officer a $300.00 per year allowance as a
Cash payment nt tho heg1nninq of the year wilt, no
requirement that the ofticers provide proof that
the funds wore heinq used for the purpose f x which
they are intended. In order to disuade the Union
from forcinq other issueq in the nugotiation process
MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
PAGE TNn
MARCH 11, 1986
which would have cost the City funds rurrent]V
not budgeted for and would have been awarded
should the City have required drhitrrtion to
occur, it was felt that the removal of the
requirement that the uniform allowance he on
a voucher basis would ho mor.• expeditious and
less costly to the City. Thvrefore, Staff has
tentatively agreed to remove the language from
the uniform allowance provision that payment he
made on a voucher basis thou: allnwirol for a cash
payment at the beginning of each year to each
uniformed officer being a member of the Union.
S. The final contract change tentativoly agreed to was
to increase the language in the contract regarding a
dental insurance option to allow in employee to use
$10.00 ut tho $I6S.0U "lixlmUlll iow- rnntrtbutiun
for purposes of purrhasinq dental insurance
coverage. This provision was accepted on the basis
that it would not cost the rite additional funds and
dental insurance cl,voraq., for singlt• lmlivillu.tl.; l.:
now costing between $15.00 and $20.00 per month.
Considering all of the issue, that were discussed during the
negotiating process and the risks that we would take in
going to arbitration on some of the issues that were
bargained away by reaching other agreements such as the
uniform allowance provision, it was felt that this
settlement would be the least costly option to the City as
well as being within budgetary allowances and would allow us
to reach a settlement on the contract in a timely fashion.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff would recommend Council authorize
preparation of a resolution accepting the provisions of a
Labor Agreement between Teamsters Local 320 and the City of
Mounds View as outlined above.
Dt• P/m j s
`nr
' MEMO TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUN
FROM: CLERK-ADMINISTRATO
DATE: MARCH 11, 1986
SUBJECT: UNIFORM ALLOWANCE FOR NON -UNION POLICE OFFICERS
As pointed out in an earlier memorandum to you outlining the
tentative agreement between Teamsters Local 320 and the
City, the. City provi,:es a $300.00 por year unifnrm allowance
for all unionized members of the city's pokce department.
Past practice has been to also allow such a uniform
allowance for uniformed members of the department not being
members of the harqaininq unit and until recently also for
non -uniformed members. As a result of the provision:: of the
Fair Labor Standards Act the practice of making cash
payments to non -uniformed and nor -unionized members of the
police department was discontinued due to the impacts it
would have upon overtime compensation being paid to these
individuals. Also, it strikes me as being unreasonable for
the City to he paying uniform allowances to individuals
wearing street clothes as their normal uniform of the day.
At this time, Staff is requesting Council direction with
respect to establishing a policy for the payment of a
uniform allowance to non -unionized members of the police
department excluding clerical staff. It is my
recommendation that Council consider establishing a policy
that would provide for a $300.00 per year cash payment to
all uniformed members of the department who are not
unionized consistent with the allowance paid to unionized
and uniformed members of the department. With respect to
non -uniformed members, Staff would recommend that payment be
made on a voucher basis only when those individuals purchase
uniform or equipment considered to be acceptable items as
established by police department policy.
Staff would appreciate Council direction in this matter.
DFP/miS
' MEMO 'ro: Mayor i City Council
FROM: Finance Director -Treasurer Braqer
DATE: February 25, 1986 �X
RE: FLEXIHLE SPENDING ACCOUNTS (FSA)
Since 1978 Section 125 of the Internal Revenue Code has allowed
employers to sponsor and administer flexible spending accounts
fcr their employees. FSA's allow employees to he reimbursed for
certain out of pocket expenses with pre-tax rather than after-tax
dollars. A FSA is funded by salary reduction on the part of the
employee. An employee's Federal and State tax withholdings are
calculated after the salary reductions have been made. Thus, an
employee's withholdings are calculated on a lower amount than an
employee who has not elected to participate in an FSA.
There are three hasic types of FSA's allowed. They are:
1. Medical
2. Dependent Care
3. Group Insurance
' A. Group short or lonq term disability insurance
B. Group life insurance
A medical FSA may be used to cover deductible amounts,
co -payments, employee contributions, or any other expense not
covered under a medical/dentai/vision plan. Under a Medical Plan
an employee would set aside money in even amounts of each pay
check on a pre -income tax basis to cover these types of
expenses. Whenever an employee would incur .such an expense
he/she pays it, then submits a request to the plan administrator
for reimbursement out of his/her FSA account. The types of
expenses allowed would he any which rnuld he deducted on an
emplrryco's Federal tax return. W:th,,ol a FSA .m omp!.ryve wr,uld
be permitted to deduct these expenses from their Federal income
tax return only if the expenses amounted to more than 5% of their
gross income in any one year. A Flpxihle Spending Account allows
the employee to have thesv expenses pa:d in full nn .1 pre-tc.rr,me
tax basis up to the amount which they contribute to the Flexible
Spendinq Account.
Another Flexible Spending Account allowed under Section 125 of
the Internal Revenue Code is a Dependent Care account. This
account allows for reimbursement of Day Care expenses while both
spouses are working. This account reimburses an ,mployee for
those expenses on a pre-tax basis up to the amount that the
emnlovee contributes to the account. The advantage to the
' employee is that payment of dependent care on this basis may
present a tax advantage greater than the child rare credit
presently allowed on their Federal tax return. The credit
allowed on the Federal tax return diminishes as gross income
rises.
February 25, 1986
Page 2
A Flexible Spending Account also may be estahlished for Group
insurance plans offered by an employer. These may be short or
long term disability income plans or group life insurance plans
in excess of amounts offered to all employees.
The accompanying material prepared by DCA (formerly Deferred
Compensation Administrators and Stanton Associates) explains
these plans in more detail.
In order to establish Flexible Spending Aecou?I[S fur employees an
employer must develop a plan in writing which should be prepared
by legal council and administer the plan as well as deduct the
employers contribution to the acrounts rhrourih payroll
deduction.
Advantages to the Plan are:
1. Federal income taxes are reduced fur employees
2. Employees may use pre-tax dollars to pay for medical benefits
not paid by the Group Health Plan.
3. The plan is relatively simple and inexpensivu to administer.
I
Disadvantages to the Plan are as follows: '
1. It. would 1IWI .r„' peyl,.l l pl ure.hn .in,l 11 w„old 1.1kr Iln-
time of someone to administer it.
2. Subsequent legislation could modify and/or eliminate FSAs.
I have received a copy of a proposal tram DC A to design and draft
a plan for the City. The cost of this would be approximately
$1,500. If it was desired that someone from DCA come out to the
City and conJuct an employee meeting to explain the Plan the fee
would be an additional $250.
I recommend that the City give serious consideration to the
establishment of a FSA Plan for its employees. I believe this to
be an inexpensive way to provide benefits to the employees.
DB/ds
OVERVIEW
Even if your employees participate in an HMO, they all will
undoubtedly incur some health care expenses which they will have
to pay themselves --expenses like premiums, deductibles, co -
payments, eyegiasses, braces, or hearing aids. If the expenses
amount to more than 5% of their gross income in any year, of
course, they can begin to deduct them. How nice it would be,
however, if they could deduct all of them. Now, they can! How?
Through an employer -sponsored Flexible Spending Account iFSA)
FSA's allow employees to set aside money in ever, amounts out of
each paycheck on a pre -income tax basis to cover these kinds of
expenses. Whenever the employee incurs such an expense, he/she
simply pays it, then submits a request to the plar, administrator
for reimbursement out of his/her pre -income tax account.
Because of the tax advantages of the program, the IRS does
require some restrictions. Elect'.ons of payroJl deduction
contribution amounts must be made before the start of the year,
and, with one minor exception, cannot be changed or discontinued
for the entire year. Also, money left over in the account at the
end of the year must be forfeited and cannot be paid back to the
employee.
FSA's are not funded. Rather, contributions directed to the plan
by employees through payroll deductions at held land used) by
I the employer until such time as a reimbursement check is
released. Employees become general coeditors of the employer to
the extent of the outstanding reimburseable claims.
AN EXAMPLE ...
Let's say that my employer decides to sponsor a health care
flexible spending account. In order to determine if I should
join, I first figure out how much my out-of-pocket expenses were
last year and how much I expect them to be in the next year--
$1,o0o in my case. Because I am in the 25% tax bracket, joining
the plan should save me over $300! So, using the enrollment
form, I sign up to put $40 per semi-monthly paycheck into my
health care FSA ($960 per year). Then, as I incur out-of-pocket
health care expenses, I pay them myself and fill o•it the expense
reimbursement claim form. I am careful to keep my receipts and
other forms of documentation, because compliance with the plan is
my responsibility, and if I can't produce this evidence if
requested by the IRS, I could be liable for tax fraud.
If I have enough expenses to meet the minimum veoouited b the
fu[m
im
plan for reimbursement ($50 in this case), I submit
to the plan administrator. once each month I will be reimbursed
for my expenses to the extent of the balance of my
or
example, if I have a $240 balance, and I submit a $200 claim, I
will receive $200 (income tax-free) from my account. If I submit
a claim for $300, however, 1 will only receive $240 on the
payment date, since that's all the money I have in my account.
The other $60 will be held in suspense until I have made two more
$40 deposits to the account, when it will then be raid and I will
have $20 left in my account. of course, I could also get the
other $20 if I had submitted more claims in the meantime. All of
the checks I receive from the administrator will contain a check
stub telling me what my balance was before my claim, now much I
am being paid, and how much my balance is after this check.
If I have submitted $1,000 worth of claims by the end of the
year, $40 will be denied (meaning that I will have had to pay $40
of medical expenses with after-tax money during the year) because
I will only have deposited $960 to my account through payroll
deduction. If, on the other hand, I only submit $903 it expenses
for reimbursement during the year, I will forfeit the other $60
in my account. So, careful planning, and perhaps a little bit of
conservatism is important on my part. However, I will still come
out ahead because paying $900 with pre-tax dollars will save me
$300 this year and, after subtracting the $60 forfeiture, will
mean an increase in cake -home pay of $240.
The accompanying booklet is intended to provide more detailed
information about how FSA's operate. DCA can assist yor with the
design, implementation, communication, and administration of
Flexible Spending Accounts for your employees.
c
? e -.*71 /
MEMO P0: Mayor and Council
FROM: Finance Director-Treasuror Braqer
DATE: March 10, 1986
RE: CONSIDERATION OF MEMBERSHIP IN THE NATIONAL ASSOCI-
ATION FOR THE EXCHANGE. OF INDUS'rR1AL RFSOIIRCES
The February, 1986 issue of Minnesota Cities, the monthly
magazine of the League of Minnesota Cities, featured a short
article on the National Association for the Fxrhanqe of
Industrial Resources (NAF,IR). Clerk -Administrator Pauley
requested that I obtain further information about NAEIR. I have
received an information packet from the Association.
The Association locates and channels free industrial donations of
equipment and materials to educational and other non-profit
organizations. NAEIR publishes qift catalogs listing avallahle
equipment and +applies. These (lift catalogs ,ir.- sent to all
members quarterly. Members receive the gifts tree and pay only
Shipping charges and a small handling fee for requested
merchandise which is shipped from NAF.IR'S Chicaqo warehouse.
Membership is open to all rveognized educational institutinns and
other non-profit, tax exempt organizations. Annual dues are $395
for a twelve month period. NAEIR quarantees that as a member we
will receive benefits with at least twice the cost of annual dues
or they will refund our annual dues.
Staff suggests membership in NAEIR.
Should you have any questinns Please do not hesitate to contact
me.
DB/ds
Attachment
The National Association for the Exchange of Induslnal
Resources locates and channels free industrial donations
of equipment and materials to educational and other non-
profit organizations The Association was founded in ISTT
acid Na,waiy wi vea life immediate needs of ovbr 5.000
educational and other community service organizations lo-
cated throughout the United States
NAEIR's free donations come from hundreds of Indus
tries. corporations. and distributors. American industry
continually accumulates large quaouties of excess materi-
als and equipment which can be put to immediate use in
educational and community service organizations Thaw
fee materials are tho result of production overruns, model
changes. order cancellations, and discontinued product
lines
Dona Lldrs of material or property also come from if
dtvlduals who wish to contribute to non -profits In a prat
tical way
NAEIR members have access to an ever -changing variety
of free products from industry. Participating NAEIR mem-
bers receive an average of $4.200 00 worth of new prod-
ucts each year All merchandise is new NAEIR does not
accept used equipment and is not part of any surplus
program.
Most schools and community organizations do not
have the additional staff or time needed to find donations
on a scale of this magnitude. NAEIR dedicates its total of
fort to searching for valuable donations and distnbuting
these tree gifts to members
NAM,", :uenilnro also recelva the NAEIR Hews. the
only (oationa: publication dedicated to advancing corporate
philanthropy through Gilts -in -Kind I donations of materials
and equipment) In additior to helping members partici
pate fully in their association. the MUIR Hewn also fea
lures articles concerning collaboration between industry.
educallon. and the community
F;NNLJh: Ll : S
Membership is open to all recognized educational inailu-
tions and other non-pront. tax-exempt organizations An
nual dues are $398 00 for a 12 month period. Membership
dues are used to obtain, handle and warehouse donations.
to communicate with members. and to inform the educa
tional and nonprofit community about NAEIR's purpose
and benefits,
:-UARAATt;
NAEIR is a non-profit 501(il Association dedicated to
providing Its members with free material and equipment
that otherwise would ',ave to be purchased or deferred
The Association is confident that this material represents
I significant and valued contribution to the members As
an expression of this confidence, the Association offers an
unconditional guarantee Ir. after one year, a member has
not received at least double their membership fee in re
quislud omrctinndlse. the membership fee will he
returned. or that mumdx,r can cumwue it NAEIR a duo
year, free of charge
I
Four times a year members
receive catalogs contsin nl,
descriptions and photos of
the free materials Availxmi
Members pay only a small
handling and shipping
charge for rhwerials re
quested and rm.elved The
current catalog contains
over 1.000 items in over 30
categories
Dal
C—i A
1i
Representative product categories In the gift catalog
Include:
MUIR HEWS is distributed
monthly to all NAEIR mom
no" newspaper
H is the only rationa.
newspaper dedicated to
pid FdCditd strengthening the bonds
IaMeooedo
- between the educational.
charitable and industrial
communities The paper
provides information on
' association members, donc-s
ueauaa and now donations. new,
�.,.. of general interest to the
membershi and inform -
own on noway poll
materia' :rat ink. 02 of m '
rarest
MUIR HEWS is distnb
died nationwide to all members. educators and commum y
linden It n..d,u ,,tit to NAEIR , growing list of donor
slid stimulates a wnslanl now of mate. lnl to NAEIR s
325.000 square loot warehouse.
NAEIR mendierslup is upon to all oral potl I. tax e.uunpt urgaruzauons including untver sums, - alleges. Cnm
mumty colleges. public schools and sehdul dish s.ts, independent schtxAs. As., hurn.hes. +.Amps. tillural develop
ment groups, educational cnnperatives, museums, pubtc scoutmgorgamzations. YV"5, YMLAb. urban
development organizations, municipalities and oRier 5011 C H 91 orgamzation%
Yes Members may choose to save shipping charges and pick up their requests at the NAEIR � i'
warehouse. 500 W Cermak Road Chicago. A handling fee for pulling and preparation or the.
material .could still apply Appointments are necessary and can be made through the
NAEIRofflce, 13121446-P111
Members pay shipping charges and a small handling fee for requested merchan
dise shipped from NAEIR's Chicago warehouse
Yes NAEIRs membership is nationwide Since the merchandise itself is free, the
shipping cost is a small percentage of the donation's total value
4EIR receives new merchandise from hundreds of manufac-
turersand distributors acnissThe United States Thisyear.
NAEIR will andreceive
equipment
and ent to NAEIR
over a beron dollars worth
of supplies and egwpmem to NAEIR members.
No NAEIR accepts and distributes only new
merchandise from industry and individuals
NAEIR publishes Gift Cattdogs listing available
supplies and equipment. Gift Catalogs are sent
to all members quartcr'j
Yes. NAEIR strives to see that all members. both large and small. are treated
equally. Most NAEIR members who participate fully receive approximately
$44, 200.00 worth of free merchandise during a memtrrship year
oz
Yes NAEIR allows multiple memberships. Individual schools %Rhin a large district or different
departments within a college or university often have their own membership
I a
NAEIR was chartered inWashington. DC , in January, 1977. as a nompro0l
ehantahle orgniuzetinn to help educational and chanlahle service organua
dons throughout thu United `.ixtr. ' 4i.1,4 is the 1, *0 ,a, au.a At. of curpo".1. _
philanthropy through Gifts -In Kind (Rifts of inurchanm•.' i Amer than roomy i .
C
THE t.I oft FITS Of AV.oCIATIGI , •
AR[ AVAILdME TO AL. EDUCATI, i
Cottle 1M1'T'( SERVli F ; 9CIIII .
We urge you to join The National As%oclanon for the Exehange of Industrial Resources and lake
advantage of the gifts made asailable by American industry and by mdluduals. To apply for
membership, fill out and return the enclosed membership appheation.
Listed here are some of the members who mdkc up The National Asssnldnon for the I -%change of
mduslnai Resources. A somplett membership dirertun will be furnished upon request.
KETCHIKAN COMMUNITY
COLLEGE
Ket[ndan Alaska
ARKANSAS SCHOOL FOR THE
DEAF
LIMIT Rock Arkansas
I ARAM'[ rOLINTv COMMUNITY
CDL L E I If
Cho"" wycoung
CARVER CAREER CENTER
CKalleSton West V,rglnw
BRIGHAM vOUNG UNIVERSITY
Provo UI.Ih
BLACK
A HILLS
KSMOP ANDRRINGC
"CITY SouIS Dakota
TRI STATL TECHNICAL COLLEGE
PendlElon SOutn Carolina
COLLEGE OF THE VIRGIN
ISLANDS
Si Thomas Virgin Islands
RHODE ISLAND SCHOOL OF
DESIGN
Providence Rnooe IstAno
UNITED STATES SPORTS
ACAOE44Y
Morrie A,dDdma
HARVARD UNIVERSIIY
CamalOge MASSacnuSells
COLGlenwood MOUNTAIN Colorado
LEGE
GRAMBVNG STATE UNIVERSITY
GraWDIH4 Louisiana
ESSEK COMMUNITY COLLEGE
Baltnrlae Maryland
DEEP SPRINGS COLLEGE
Dyer Nevada
CUMBERLAND COLLEGE
WllkdmsDurg Kenlaky
VASSAR COLLEGE
PougnkeeoSM New Yak
LOYOLA UNIVERSITY
5TRITCM SCMOUL OF MEDICINE
MAYwdod once%$
BIRMINGMAM ROTA -LAL
GARDENS
Birmingham AMDAmA
x IPS SAY BOYS CLUB
BrOna New Yak
NATIONAI SOCIETY FOR
,Nil RN%HIP AND I KPE NU NIIAI
1 uUCAI ION
R, Ie,Vn Nenh Lmo nd
JEWISH GUILD FOR THE BLIND
New York New York
CROSSCURRENTS INTFR
NATIONAL INSTITUTE
DaVlon Uhl)
CANBY GROVE CONF(RFNCE
CtNIEN
Canby Oregon
f IRST BAPTIST CHURCH
Nnolna Palk Ok;AhMi
fAAM AD
FOUNDATION INCRNESS
PtytnUunl. Vermont
GREATER CHATTANOOGA
CHRISTIAN SERVICES
CnaNAndega Tennessee
nFllsRlENINC
CeuaalRhode lnnn
CHILDREN S AID SOLIE I v
CNaOIMd Pennsy vaniA
CITY OF UNION LIBRARY
PARKS AND RECREATION
Orion Iowa
LAKESHORE DAY CARE CENTER
INC
Manitowoc Wisconsin
MEDFORD RECREATION
I UMMISSION
Becloud Virginia
KITSAP COMMUNITY ACTION
PROGRAM
Bremerton WasMngton
FOX VAtIEY SMEtTERED
WORKSHOP INC
Applelon Wisconsin
BUYS QUEUE OMAHA INL
Omaha Nebraska
MONADNOCK CHRISTIAN
NURSING MOM(
Jamey New Mdngneue
COMMUNITY PSYCHIAIR!C
MSIIIIIiI INL
Lr.1 In nopFHw I, - .n
MILMIGAN CANCIN FUaNOA1IUN
Detroit MKhlgdn
MID STATE EDUCATIONAL
COOPERATIVE
1.11le I.d,'. M..dn-.•.I
PRISBVIk RIAN CMO.UMLN
SERVICES
Farmmglor Mnsdun
MUSEUM OF FINE AR IS
Boson MdSSALnusens
MASONIC HOME Of GEORG,A
Macon Geolgw
ST PAUL LUTHERAN CHURCH
P.rvenport load
RE TARDE D Ct E VE NS 1A I 'ON I OR
Stogton Mane
YOUTH FOR UNDERSTANDING
Wdsh., pall 01.
LENIRAL TLIMIDA CUUNCit
BOV SCOUTS Of AMERICA
Drunoo FIWidd
YMCA
MUM.e Inmdnd
ST FRANCIS AAVEA CHIIRLH
l a Grange IOlno,s
PRESERVA� ON PROGRAM NEIGHBORHOOD
swnlwo ConMcl.cul
DEPARTMENT Of COFi1EC11011.
Smyrna Delaware
MERCY HOSPITAL
Furl Scott KansaS
PINE SUMMIT CAMP
Big Bear Lake Cdalornu
t lf i
1�L1 .,
TWIN WELLS INDI6N SLMWL
Sun Valley Alltond
MAUI HIGH SCHOUL
Kanlyul Hawan
FARGO PUBLIC SCHOOLS
Faroll Nam Dakota
I IIION \ NO I AI1.
ALA91 My
ikwl,CW W,H Wq,tl
MONTESSORI SCHOOL Of
HOUSTON
H,)Iltilnn TNAI
Ar IMA HL RHL W ALAIN M.
Mworn SIaIWII pemuylvdnle
'd.ln'I Dubt �_ �I,mdUt
INTERLOCMEN ARTS ACADIMY
inlrriocrien MKagan
FOOTHILLS SCHOOL.
AloiuDuetlRre New MevKO
SAL MON SCHOOL DISTRICT
•(•II
S.IIInoo LOAN
FRANKFORT BOARD OF
EDOCATICN
Ftd 14sri Kenlucky
Hill INA %CMOOI IIISIM11 I It
Meknd 'Aonlena
MUNTGOMERY LAIHOOL HIGH
%CMOOIL
Monlipunely A.dLV I'd
CARUTHERS UNION
EIIMINIARY SLHOfn
Lmllure s CalrormA
OAK MdLLS HIGH SCHOOL
.SADdI14% Mmne
CLAY p1NIOR HIGH SCHOOL
Camkl Indiana
LENNOX HIGH SCHOOL
Lennox South Dakota
RIDGEWOOD HIGH SCHUUI
RHltpewwta New Jersey
J
MEMO TO; Mayr.r d City Council
FROM: Finance Director -Treasurer Brager
.
DATE: February 26, 1986
RE; STATU"" OF 1995 HATER ANn ,F.WF.R FUND CONTINGENCIES
FOR MAIN BREAKS AND REPAIRS
The 1985 Water and Sewer Fund's Budgets each contained a
contingency of S15,000 for main breaks and repairs. During 1985
repairs of water main breaks cost the City $2,478 (see F.xhihit 1)
leaving an unexpended balance of $11,522 in the Water Fund
Contingency account. In 1983 the Council initiated the policy of
designatinq the unexpended balances of the Contingency accounts
as Reserves for Water and Sewer Main Breaks. The present balance
of that Reserve is $30,368. 1 recommend that Council add to the
balance of that Reserve the unexpended 1985 Water Fund
Contingency of $11,522. Such action would bring tho total
balance of the Reserve to $42,890.
During 1985 repairs of sewer main breaks cost the ('ity $8,196
(see Exhibit II) leavinq an unexpended balance of $6,804 in the
Sewer Fund Contingency account. The present balance of the
Reserve for Sewer Main Breaks is $18,835. 1 recommend that
Council add to the balance of the Reserve for Sewer Main Breaks
the unexpended balance of the 1985 Sewer rund Contingency of
$6,8U4. Such a tion would bring the total balance of the Reserve
fo $25,639.
RECOMMENDATION: Council adopt a resolution adding the unexpended
balances of the 1985 Water and Sewer Fund's
Contingency accounts to ehe (later and Sewer
Fund's Reserves for Main Br•-aks. A suggested
resolution is attached for your crmsideration.
DB/ds
Attachments
EKHIBIr 1.
WArER FUND
1985 MAIN BREAKS
Program Description Amount
643 Silver Lk. Rd. 6 Cty. "H-2" $ 690.48
644 Cty. Rd. "H" 1,787.95
T—j,178.13
Designa hxi 12/31/84 $30,368.00
1985 Contingency 15,000.00
1985 Breaks 2,478.00
Designated 12/31/05 "v42,890.00
i
EXHIBIT 11.
Pronram
646
SEWER EIIND
1985 MAIN BREAKS
Description Amount
Vario,ic s 8, 196.04
Designated 12/31/84 $18,835.00
1985 Cnntingrro-y 15,000.OJ
1985 Breaks 8,196.00
Designated 12/31/85 529,639.00
RESOLUTION NO.
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION DESIGNATING RETAINED F.ARNINgS OF THE. WATER
AND SEWER FUNDS FOR FUTURE FOR WATER AND SEWER MAIN BREAKS
WHEREAS, $15,000 was budgeted for water main breaks ann
$I5,000 was budgeted for sewer main breaks in 1485; and
WHEREAS, at December 31, 1985 there existeu a budget
balance of 512,522 for water main breaks and them existed a
budget balance of $6,804 for sewer mai6 breaks; and
WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Council to aesignate
Retained for future water and sewer main breaks;
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Council tnat
$12,522 of retained earnings Of the Water Fund is hereby
designated for Future Water Main Breaks and affirms that as a
consequence of this designation the total amount to designated '
is $42,890 and that $6,804 of retained earnings Of the Sewer
Fund is hereby designated for Future Sewer Main Breaks and
affirms that as a conae;.ie^ce of this designation the total
amount so designated is $25,639.
Adopted this th day of , 1986.
ATTEST:
(SEAL)
---------
Mayor
-----
clerk-AdtniriiafreEor
m /
MEMu TO: Mayor i City Council
FROM: Finance Director -Treasurer Braoer
DATE: February 26, 1986
RE: RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING 1985 WATER AND SEWER
MAINTENANCE
The Water and Sewer Systems Maintenanrn and Capita' Improvements
Program, adopted in 1983, outlines a fivrr year program of
maintenance activities and capital improvements. The total costs
of each year's projects vary greatly: from a low of $36,000.00 to
a hiqh of $188,700.00 in the. Water Fund, for example. To
minimize the impart on annual hudgets, the Program adopted a
twofold approach to financing these projects:
1) An anmial maintenance allowance would be budgeted in the
Water and Sewer Funds; at,d
2) Interfund loans(s) would be utilized to finarce the laEaer
projects of the Water Fund with an amount hudgeted earh
year to repay the loan(s).
A total of $30,041.00 was expended on water maintenance projects
in 1985 (see Exhibit I). Financinq for these projects was
provided by the 1984 Maintenance Allnwance of $42,500.00. The
1985 Debt Service Allowance of $23,458.00 was not used since
larqe projects requiring interfund loans have not yet been
undertaken.
Of the $65,958.00 budgeted for Water Maintenance Projects in 1985
there remains a balance of $33,917.00. The 1986 Budget contains
approximately $149,400 of (late_ Maintenance Projects. I,
therefore recommend that Council designate thi; 1985 unexpended
halance of $35,917.00 for future Water Fund Maintenance and
Capital Improvement Projects.
Durinq 1985 a total of $19,669.00 watt expended on Sewer
Maintenance Projects (see Exhibit II). Of the $33,187.00
budgeted for 1985 Sewer Maintenance Projects there remains a
balance of $13,518.00. I recommend that Council designate this
1985 unexpended balance of $13,518.00 for Future Sewer Fund
Maintenance i Capital Improvement Projects.
NECOMMENDA'rION: Council designate the unexpended amounts budget-
ed for 1985 Water t Sower Maintenance for Future
Maintenance and Capital Improvemeet Projects.
Proposed resolutions are attached for your
consideration.
DB,'ds
Attachments
F.XII I HIT I.
WATER FUND
1985 MAINTENANCE
Prnqram
Description
Amount
614
Well
13
Phase II Pilot Study
S 963.23
626
Well
12
Repairs
505.30
645
Well
14
Repairs
25,152.86
647
Well
13
Phase III Pilot Study
3,419.77
Designated 12/31/84
1985 Maintenance Allowance
1985 Debt Service Allowance
1985 Maintenance Projects
Designated 12/31/85
30, J11. 16
$21,764.00
42,500.00
23,458.00
3U,U4I.00
�s�,bai.-off
' EXHIBIT I1.
S h.Wr:N FUND
1985 MAINTENANCE
D,?Rcr ipt ion Ammnint
730-122 Root Control S19,669.25
Designated 12/31/84 $59,66U.CU
1985 Maintenance Allowance 33,187.00
1985 Maintenance 19,669.00
Designated 12/31/85 $73,I78.00
RESOLO TION NO.
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
roUNTY 11F NAMSFY
5rArE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION DESIGNATING RETAINED EARNINGS OF rHE SEWER
FUND FOR FUTURE. MAINTENANCE: AND
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
WHEREAS, the 1985 Sewer Budget provided $33,187
for projects contained in the 1983 Water and Sewer System's
Maintenance and Capital Improvement Program; and
WHEREAS, on December 31, 1985 there remained a balance
of $13,518 available for Sewer Fund Projert+; and
WHEREAS, it is
the desirr of the Council to make those
monies available for
future maintenance and
capital
improvement projects;
NOW, THEREFORE
BE IT RESOLVED by the
Council that
an additional $13.518
of retained earnings
of the Sewer Fund
is hereby designated
for Future Maintenance
and Capital
Improvement Projects
and affirms that as a
consequenre of this
designation the total
amount so designated
is now $73,178.
,
Adopted this
day of , 1986.
ATTEST:
(SEAL)
— --------------------
Mayor
C1er4-AAministrator
RESOLUTION NO.
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSF.Y
S'rATF. OF M I NNESOTA
RESOLUTION DESIGNATING RETAINED KARNINGE OF FHE WATER
FUND FOR FUTURE. MAIKENANCF. AND
CAPITAL !MPROVEMENr PROJECTS
WHEREAS, the 1985 Water Fund Budqet provided $65,958 for
projects eontninv,l in tho 1983 Water and Sewrr Syst,m's
Maintenance and Capital Improvement Proqram; and
WHERE4S, on December 31, 1985 there remained a balance
of $35,917 available for Water Fund maintenanco and capital
improvements; and
WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Council to make those
monies available for future maintenance and capital
improvement projects;
NOW, THRREFORF. H17 IT RESOI.VF.D by Ihr Council that
an additional $35,917 of retained earnings of the Water Fund
r- is hereby designated for Future Maintenance and Capital
Improvement Projects and affirms that as a consequence of this
designation the total amount so designated is now $57,681.
Adopted this day of , 1986.
ATTEST:
(SEAL)
Mayor ------ -- •--- --- -
Clerk -Administrator
MF.Mv iv: may.,,- i city
FROM: Finance Director —Treasurer Brager /LJ
DATE.: March 12, 1986
RF.: APPLICATION OF CENTURY MERCURY MUrOR FREIGHT CO THE.
COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE, STATE. OF MINNESOTA FOR A
REDUCTION IN ASSF.SSrn VAIAIATIONS OF THEIR REAL ESrgTF.
the City has received correspondence from the Property
Equalization Division, Department of Revenne, State of Minnesota
regarding an application that Century Mpreory Motor Freight has
filed with the Commissioner of Revenue for reduction in assessed
valuation of their real estate located within the City. This
reduction or abatement of property taxes has been recommended by
the Ramsey County Board of Commissioners, the Ramsey County
Auditor, and the Ramsey County Assessor. Minnesota Statutes,
Section 270.19 provide that where the reduction in Assessed
valuation of any property exceeds SIUU,000 the City, Town, or
School District in which property is located may request a
hearing to object to the reduction or abatement. If the City
would require a hearing on this application a request would have
to be made within 20 days, or by March 26, 1986.
On receipt of this letter I telephoned Daniel Flaherty of the
Ramsey County Assessors Office and learned the following:
1. Century Mercury Motor Freight made application for the
reductinn in assessed valuations and submitted an independent
appraisal which stated the vaLle of their property as $1,350,000
in estimated market value.
2. The Ramsey County Assessors Office conducted their own
appraisal of the property and determined that the estimated
market value should be $1,700,000. This is the value which they
used to calculate the assessed valuations For taxes payaDle 1983,
1984, 1985, 1986. The variation in the assessed valuations for
those years is due to the change in the meL`od of the calculation
of the assessed valuation pursuant to changes in the formula
mandated by the State Legislature.
3. The reduction in assessed v& uations of the property for the
years 1983 through 1986 will result in an abatement of the City's
share of property taxes for those years in the amount of
57,419.22. This amo-int will be deducted from the property tax
set,:em�nts that the City will receive in 1986.
March 12, 198b
Page 2
If the City were to object to this reduction in assessed
valuation the only grounds that we might have would be if we
conducted our own appraisal of the property and that appraisal
indicated a different estimated market value than that which the
County has determined is proper for the property. Staff does not
feel that an independent appraisal of the property would vial-1
results substantially different than that of the County's
appraisal.
RF,COMMFNDATION: Do not appeal the application of Century Mercury
Motor Freight for reduced assessed valuations.
DB/ds
Attachment
0
1
STATE Or MINNL501 .,
DCPAurM,hT 'IF "r V[N01
P. 0. Box 64446
St. I'., n!, SIN liI64
March 116, 1988
Mr. Lou McKenna
Ramsey County% Director
Ramsey County Courthouse
St. Paul. Minnesota 55102
Mr. Donald F. Pauley
Mounds View City Clerk-Admr
Mounds View City 11011
2401 Highwac No. 10
St. Paul. Minnesota 55112
' 0 •\\
µ0;fa•ty :1. w
s•
\dr. Richard hard
Ramsey Counly Assessor
Ramse\ C'011n1y Courthouse
St. POul. Minnesota 5510?
Clerk
School District •621
'!959 Ilamline Avenue N.
Roseville, Minnesota 55113
HE: Application #323226 (Ramsey County Mu1531i)
Century Mercury Motor, has filed with the Commissioner of Revenue
an application for reduction in the assess: d valuation of certain real
estate in the City of klounds liew. Ramses County. Minnesota. The
tax identification number of the property is: 17-30-23-14-0006-5
The application states that a reduction in the assessed valuation of the
above -described property is warranted to reflect corrected data.
The application requests that the assessed valuation for the veer 1962,
taxes payable in 1983, he reduced from $836,810.00 to 51'9.500.00.
assessment year 1933, taxes payable in 1984 he reduced from $873.431.00
to f7.26,500.00, assessment year 1984, taxes payable in 1985 be reduced
from $868,931.110 to Sit2,uUU,uU; and assessment year 1P65. laze• payable
in 1986 be reduced from 5868,931.00 to $122.000.Ou. The abatement
has been recommended by the county board. the 'ounty auditor. and
the county assessor of Ramsey County.
Minnesota Statutes, Section 270.IJ, provides that , here the reduction
in assessed valuation of any properly exceeds 51U().0u0.U11 the rity. town.
school district. and county in which the property is Iocated may request
YOUr
hean
1hearng on tect to hesreduction.
lapplcationlf please�lenc+'aour request me
within 20 days.
AN tin 1Ai I ..
III.: :lpplir:dwn f::':f'"!f !Hum,t.% r,inR soil Srl
11xrch 116. 1986
Paw. rwoov
If I rervive no ioquc.t for a hv.,^ing n•?ltuo Cn d:n• frun.:u" of the politt,•HI
,andlvl%iAn` Hfferted b.% tht• rt•.IHrtlon. tht' r.Ill W (teemed to
tw wnived. and the upplirOwn Hill h von't6-red t: ('omr..• Tuner
of Hevenue nn its merit<.
You mac phnm• mr HI 1t+L•'1 64^ !49$ if .o..: ,•h I .rt r information.
You mux nl�o -nn art Ihv Incul ro•c�wr nr :•nnrt. ,,., ,,t,r if )nu IIHVC
am queaion> rotating to ll,c reamml fur the p,•ol/r,•••,, rr,ln unn.
Sincerer,
4w
LYI.E I . ,%SK. 11ireclor
Propert I:gI:dL.^..Lrn W%iiion
LIIA:.mc
MEMO TO: Mayor i City Council
FROM: Finance Director -Treasurer Rrager
DATE: March 12, 1986
RE: TELEPHONE EVUIPMENT LFASr.-PURCHASE. AGREEMENT
When the telephone system was purchased the City entered into a
72 month lease purchase agreement with Contel Credit
Corporation. The interest rate on this lease is 15.251. At the
time the lease was entered into that was the market rate for that
type of agreement. Subsequently interest rates have been lowered
dramatically. Rates on investments which the City is able to
purchase are presently at 7.5%.
I propose that the City prepay this lease and ref!nance it with
an interfund loan from the City's Water Utility Fund. I have
Contacted Contel Credit Corp. and the prepayment amount would ne
$13,100.91. The balance could be refinanced with an interfund
loan from the Water Utility Fund at an interest rate of 7.5% per
annum. The term of this interfund loan would he 5 years, which
is the same amount of time remaining on the original lease
�._ purchase from Contel Credit Corporation. Refinancing this lease
with an interfund loan would result in a savings in interest
costs of approximately $2,490.24 over five years.
RECOMMENDATION: Council authorize staff to prepay the telephone
lease -purchase agreement to Contel Credit
Corporation in the amount of $13,104.91 and to
prepare a resolution authorizing an interfund
loan from the Water Fund to the General Fund
in the same auoont at 7.51 per annum for a
term of 5 years.
DB/ds
/v
MEMO TOI Mayor R City Council
FROM: Finance Director-Troasurer Braqer f.
UA I'E: March 12, 1486
RE: WAS'I.1: MANAGFMFN'r FEE ASSF.SSF.D AGAINST
rtry OWNPD PROPCR'rIFS HY RAMSEY COIINTf
Ramsey County has assessed various City owned properties a Waste
Management Foe to help finance a -•source recovery facility it is
constructing and will be op.•ratim jointly with Washintitun
County. The properties assessed and the amount of the assess-
ments are as follow" -
Property
Fee
City Hall
S 81.34
Md ui1 ,•n.u,r.• :Ln .n 1••
it I . 14
N1.3491.34
Well 14
Hillview Park
91 34
Groonfield Park
$4Ut.76
Total Fees
City owned property is exempt trom property taxation but not from
special assessments. Legislation provides that City owned
properties may be assessed on the same hasis as privately owned
properties.
I have discussed this fee with Cietk-Administrator Paulev and it
is our opinion that this fee should he paid for the City Hall and
Maintenance Garage but not for any other City owned properties.
Our rationale for this is that other than the City liail and the
Maintenance Garage the other City owned properties do not
generate any solid waste. Persons using City parks may
occasionally deposit trash in the trash barrel, located in the
parks, however, the Maintenance Department colle,:ts that trash
and places it in the dumpster at the Maintenance Garage.
Staff awaits Council direction or, this matter.
DH/ds
Attachments
E
This week, more than 8,000 tons
of our garbage will be dumped in landfills.
we have to do
something about tt.
!Ann • Ikv nrm mMmJ I. a.Mtl 44,111
�n I�nr pn qkm In WII'rI.TN IM ILY h u a an•..1
ILLkir,oi nwyMnl Irn.n.hkh■an11n
1. V1111 0IN P�nkkW LIii I'n• Twh:,kh.n
ry+I I.. to nr .rnkr. and.A hn aR IkeMJ
I.u, y,Irl.ap I ..L: xa•II � I. nI. IwI IN
Iln.min LIx1Lll• TI:r 1A nun nl11i nul
�n�h11:r•a•xn unJ .n11 LIWfilllry rl.kl. wC V.M
I ranTh tYnnVnl'rylr!111•\Yl kai tl.0 th'
yn.x.An,r xhnh nlrRJr• JnnrIh cV,In,1 tllr
xAL.4 ln14!�k Iikna+l l.'I"'*` fMJnv
• .�tl h-WI tII. y�yA1y�ay�µl L.a•Ills �IPAiI'itn
P. "I'", r, Iq;IJaIUC M1 I�Ini A W
pow I.., II IIMI n pl.x'J I In M1Ql.iryall
m mp.ln: n I. LLII Iu nJ,.I ,Im drp-", I In
W 111l Ilr I.114AILa-Ltd bran+ to fiJ nv
.v • M.IA'lr . AN xaw — I:k..k11 a pn da Iry
Cnl^p cJ rr.�rhry mxrn.:l• WI Mrpnm pl+.•
LI and I. ti 1 h'nC� ukl �s 11RIlIp I Ihn
nka❑u.yt •Ill:n Nl nIJk.I rl+rry nor,n
�4
N'cxt year, when we
throw out garbage,
much of it will be
turned into fuel.
In I'MI pynr+ InJ IdMlpLn I, I., L.l m
wo.m.l .r.T n.xvJ pnartmp it. lmnlnnlrm ant
nkt 1111111A I.x..Ll.n •M1VY`V Thr RiI:•rin.•
I .11110 h If a rrxwll Mr.rn lY lhn ltA -11: 1.
Illrrt t.n'r'u��lTiyc Iy?.,Pr Inu 1W Thn y tlm .11.
nJuC I `. r.tt; lu AMIM111 I. M h•_1l rk rl rr.
uIJrcalx�vI pn.kk n In•rii rkm Arl hk
P.nIlll lnn .l rk.lr.m
Tk Ku , .nh.ryl.n "m.l mmrn 1-0.1,
n ns WI IMVMI.n n Ile t In .tl N{vlM n
Ihlryl�nt l..uul it xillAyn Pl wlvlrp ynh},. 1.
IRA, : 11 ]W IIM
r' 0
Resource Recovery.
It's required by 1990.
III . ru A" h� IN Y ii II,Lwu1
nlrn trJ Ln tk fxtlln IA ILIA, L7 AU, fiLII
L. Iitn r,." all prhgl in Ihr mrt, p 4'W ur.
ILL p. li,r rv, r ramen Ix lhI,A 1'..1
nk mI nn �4�p rlerpmN m pnrry n.ar nu
In'rp I. m.It .ImplL nrJ rr.l cWn,., ItYn wtlpn
Jk q y nNW In Ok p• WIJ fir vnI IayJn.n
IL II1 0 1I x J W p.revlry .uu1J .w.l IN Lunn
.nllr thin, IanNUM run p/Ir Nr Iwnn ft
alrtlrnr..• rur Mm 4n 4..rr nwyrmml
Imxr. A.h.rprya kl n"mrtwknr• Thu..hl
II I.. M h< NI I uY U1 flLtlnnl
KI,i N 11111 n IwMn Iu,, tern
Irrkn In IA hrhl I• pnur.J.vrr PULL Inr1 Ykl
rnrrrl r n, een l.0 n . nn:m d firer fuw'I
ur Ikip" 1..I.nlne ,w trAhwxl.l kArrtitp in
p•rhw Iry+. ka,,a mnn "Mm Iinllrnr
Resource Recovery.
I.I. Waste th:.t won't go to waste.
Olin p Ihr rnxr 1tc W
11x Ic xdl Ik Ip ry, hn prurntlp, v.-
KaR,;nIntl-hkl ai Elk ' rrvxxar rcau,rn t,,,in
III k... pm
0. III 1 mill Me In pa, m, our bk*f hx pk"
up rtn ptAapN
1,. \„ur a a.n haulrr Mlb Iw h n , � �Ik, nrlK
amr all, and JI"ally', of a•alt hauler, asl
,mlrrWr ul pn nWa A W t harp b dk.t a'nx r,
• In am I brut- chaWd Nc ertke kr now d dr
fxthn Ixlm I nprn =III mid 19i
The , -Iunt, hJ, I,, R"Km pnvg fin Karflap I,
Ix Pr. x,.kJ at dx InilIn a, xxnn n upcn. In
nrlkr n, ha,, a I, x n, ,d rurkb as W,k aI llul
Iinx- Ilk ,I-IkalNn YIRe., inu twill, N.'
N to tl c. IN, kc appear m tq papm, lax
a Icflltnt• b n a mI
Itk Ihlryr,m ukp ua ,lal[ROI n a kr lur
v nx r. Ilk" kr n mr haxW -n Ct �rkt Iglu
a Icur pn-prrn luc pnlx'n- wn a✓I .IW it „
n, a hawW .m Ih, ,ulu I i h,mrtl m 1mr M p rr,
Ilk, Iqt', ul amrwlxnn I,u plNu plpr,xrnk'nt.
art Iw,AI Ilk- It, n'flc,v, Ihr Iv. d „ava
nunaKrnx'm .rnx r, out Ihr alr, aI I I pn xl k
n, n"vtk"nl, R~ I nunn ,mW Mt .K,l, I.
MII tVr a'pmllfh hn IN xakr 1Y\tK,nxni
„'nx„h, hell Ntr vuhnlK dk ,-,v, it,
. � nrm u, kk J n x a, ,M'aprr ark- nn. tda xm
I,, hLl tilt mph a ., vtm abca,h <vaMldk J
b dK xrr.xe kr m rm' pnlprn, m Ltrmunt a
Illlr Iunr aharpr•
�,unn a,ll Mr I„ rur n ni, 1,n It,
a at¢ puluKamknl x'n:t r, nkkfklt h..,, IN
r'm,a h, will lk tharµ,'J mnLL*.
71n IlkkrW a, pm Our aul<pnaavxl( wtkm
bnd111b An, 1lkaprrl
LukV ll, an :k x t k lit - in d, 4 xpl run
x rttk' x 141 hantd m lamaill, WA dv,xgh IN
Kr. uM innpiuWxalrl xhkh aylphc•mu h,k
-art Jim" anrr lkanuq: W or. kxklNmPr
p Iluu, In UndfiV, t an I,,k mdlkxa , x J, Jlan
an,1 nu, m., n pnvhk Ylan, ftm i ,loan
Iamlfill, m-x la.r Ihr, .kiln Ilp „M, .� dry
a harp> fur Jlgxlxll are Im IraknK .uh,(antulh
Ilk jw,xla,rn thr tlnl„I/aavl pnx,wrlp
aril tkT mirp %Amu In IuWfill, K,., vnalh+ and
vnalkr twh Ira aril It aIII In J... ff"r
alt,wilh r
!Amc rnY Pjrhlpc all- he pxr* to Ihr rrxkrce
RCI . btlL:, mdxr Ihan III a IMWh11 .Nj,,W 1
ulll rmlpw rtn IrAr. And pak,,[W p.M
rnnr'k rtn alumvllrn a-.. mx,paprt. Film and
x h•
1,. Kt't,t Lhk andt,mlp,vahit nwrful.
as Ultuhlt nv wh,. h-uu,r Iht. tun A milk
In[.. nra pn xlx 11 aM ux J ,ntr anJ ,nrr aYlun
11k' uxml\ gfltnglI CMtNfaK., uU In t mlrnW
mol, hryl anJ „wnmjnK Mawr Mxc,xry;
n'a., hryt aM t, m In..nrry ., hkxc Ih' utk p ul
,a rt"JuIni' Ilk anent'u Wmala JMNred in
Rix lu--Ikl It•, aav, in IN Knluml k,d- I,a
t kurkr ilk m,p,grm ."mvrorlkm WJ... IN
p r91 nm nv xIn r rtx :tilt lilt, n aLl,lruhh
I heap r h k hail Ihr .+loon am: q. n+ak'ni.
// ttkI Aur/krlber yrlrtlnxu ptrurr.ul! Mr
Rranrarl'Gwnll Eiu rn.xxrnud/kulrb lA:Wr.rr
631021
ii
r `EID HALF STUB IF 1985
LOANCO::'A
►Pa►EMIY ROE NtNILneI,XY NII
l —1 " UTK IO •O
o 23 331 GL16 9 FORTAXDEPARTMENIII$i ONLY
NAME OP TAMPA'&A RLL.ND� VIEe
MAKE CHECKS ►AVASLE TO
CITY OF RUUNUS VlEh DIRECTOR PROPERTY TAXATION
24UI MIMMVAY iJ UIS COURTHOUSE
$T PAUL MINN 7l112 ST PAUL MINNESOTA 6610E
TOTAL
�TAK
PAnPEATV ADDRESS IIt AVIVIDPENAI IV PAY r1N(W
PIIINII IM:P IUIR IN 1•PYI
17u1 h1LLVILP AUAL hILE� ,� PdE'' I SECOND �GPlT
"IT[ IN ANY NAME AND ADDRESS [MANGES .TAK
T ouM rANCELLED CMECK IS YOUR RECEIPT
DETACH FEERE AND RI TUMN THIS PORTIl1N Wlln PA YME hI
TAXPATER'f CO'Y b STATEMENT OF PROPERTY TAX
THIS COPY
PAYABLE IN 1986 RAMSEY COUNTY, MiNN.
R0 �/
POT UR RECO6
FORYO
OYOUR
—EW—
►RIRRIVIII{IET61CAIN].N,HO
Co.,
9E[ TNN R0E OTR IMPROVEMENTS O
77,
f STIMATfD MARKET yA:UE
Oo 30 13 33 �JlU 9 R o21 A55E56EOVALUE _
NAMEOF TAXPAYt
I ARE YOU ELIGIBLE FOR A REFUND)
TO find Out d you're el101D1e for
The Mlnnewto Property TEA Rdund
1r MOUNDS V 1 F V
CITY
1.11 out FORM M I PR LI,nE These AR`OuPIS
CIY MI GMOUN lU
,)T PAUL MINN 5i112
1 Ftll In this amount a hrH IO
. i J
-- PRo►utr Aoonfss
2 FJI In this amount On hM 12
1 iUl MELLVIEP RUAD _
. LC
PROPERTY OWNER J
I", Povw Rn
SIAU JF RINRTA
TKUST cAtFPT
ICV CLURI hUUSE
�l PALL MINN 55102
— —�
DiIINOUENT TAX
a
YO V �IT6M$EDSYATEMENt
IT Ihn WE h CRACIIeC. YW CAR IMI:IIOIMIII WPl MIO IAPr
3 STATE 'SAE OVER
. CO
WE WIV Iry IIr, WOM, W ICfwAd
A COUNTY
STONNSHV ON CITY
6 SCHOOL DISTRICT
/ OTHER TAXING O'STRICTS
• OO
CID
P cD
SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
NAME NAME
NO
AMOUNT
pASTL naRT
UuJa
• UO
E TAX BEFORE CREO.TS
6 CREOIYSRIIICHAEOUCE VOURTAX
IO TAX AP TER CAEOITS . CO
11 SPECIAL AESE{SMENT{
1' TL
A PRINCIPAL e
Lu
E INTEREST
TOTAL�fEf ITEM n _ ' tE. TOTAL TAX �y
= 2w HALF STUB • 1986
LO•h CA ANO ACCT NO _F1A}LNi. ILXtNIA AA1xNNlI
I i rc TIR Rot uTR O
s
NAME —
YI OF rARPAVIrfR
CITY uP RU1rNEi
24u1 M1"WAT 1J
ST PAUL AN
PROPERTY AOORESe
■■� HJd MILLVIES dW0 f« d1
E WRITE IN ANY NAME AND ADDRESS CHAN
i
M
FOR TAX OEPAPTMENT USE ONLY
MAKE CHECKS PAYABLE TO
DIRECTOR PROPERTY TAXATION
:!B COURTHOUSE
Ile IST PAUL MINNESOTA SS102
�L— _
I TOTAL yl.34
— I G%
TO AVOID PENAL T• 'AY ON UH
BE F OR E 0,7 IMF A I S "gilt
ucoaD 4C.67
o R CANCELI ED CHECK 15 YOUR RECEIPT
DETACH MERE AND RETURN THIS PORTION WITH PAYMENT
OU
TAXMYIR'S CCIIY o STATEMENT OF PROPERTY TAX
RETAIN THIS COPY �ggg RAMSEY COUNTYMINN
FOR vouR , RECORDS PAYABLE IN ---
N1LfERTv atEwTlf lgCigh Nu HOOL LOAN
SEC TNN RUE OTR i0 t'p"' OIST COMP NEW IMPROVEMENTS I2.4�C
ESTIMATED MARKET VALUE _111TC
Oy 3J L3 ar � 0 If 621 ASSESSED VALUE _ --
NAME OF TAXPAYER ARELYOU Y out d GIBLe eligible OlOR e IREFUNOT
or
TM MI1 wte Property TAX Refund
CITY LF RUUA0i111LB t,;; UUr FURL.11g11 PP „,nQ tneA emountt
2401 N1608AY lu
55112
ST PAUL NN
1 0.0 in toll etMurn UI1 line 10
.00
PAOIERTv AooIIESS
2 Fili in It,, emou,,( Lin 6ne 12
2�ue MlLLIFIto ROAD wE1La4)
__--:
.Co
PROPERTY OWNER
CITY OF MOu RJiYIEE
N/C.F0ftVVV
2401 Ml6fEYAY 10
55112
$T PAUL AN
yoURS•112ED ST•TEMENT
TAX
STATEMdoOLIINpENT
A
e11K
eoa . ScYO. YY
ly tM P,, I" HVNI
T111hI.
K COVNY
,
,OO
ro,
PRINT
V ECiAL AeSl SSME NTS
TOWNSHIP OR CITY
6. TOWM
. CO
h AME NU
It SCHOOL O-STRICT
. CC
J OTHER TARING DISTRICTS
RAoIL nuRl OJOV 81.3�
.00
E TAX BEFORE CREDITS
E CREDITSYNICHAEOUCE YOUATAX
TOTAL SEE ITEE! I1
10 TAX AFTC1I LnEO'•S
11 S"CIAL ASSCSSMCNTS
A PRINCIPAL
e �NTf REST
EE. rol AL TAR �w
STUB •1986
Yr.I. �. .1 iI ICAI KIN M
Y. IR.• M.I. uTR IO
Lu'! 3u 2a 31 003E O FOR TAX ID AFITMENT USE ONLY
NAME OE TAK►AYEw r•:UhUS VIIA b
MAKE CNECRS PAYABLE TO t
1
CITY . r RJUNC! S V It Y DIRECTOR PROPERTY TAXATION I
2401 MIGNSAY IV IN COURTHOUSE A
A 56107
ST PAUL, MINNESOTA
ST PAUL Rh 5511i q
TOTALrAx I 71.34 O
_ �
H ,01111 ♦ ADDRESS _ TO AVOID PENALTY PAY ON ON
BEFORE OCTOBER 15 19E6
N1Lly1t► KUAU (�fr TnLA PA *A SEn CID
4C.t7 I
WR17E IN ANY NAME AND ADDRESS CHANGES
.F
1.
1.
1.
.t
DE TACK HE RE AND RF IUFIN THIS PUX TION WHYOUR LANCE LLE D CHECK IS V OUR R ECE IIT If
H PA NT It
WPAY91" COPY 0 STATEMENT OF PROPERTY TAX AE
FOR
YOUR
THIS COPY _ 1986 RETAIN
INVRREtOROs PAYABLE IN RAMSEY COUNTY, MINN 1S{yE
PnOPERTYIOENTT1—c TIO'; • SCHOOL LOAN f�
SE[ TWN RIS at ID CO'"' DIET COMP NEW IMPROVEMENTS it,
ESTIMATED MARKET VALUE
US 3u t3 31 OUan 6 h 621 ASSESSED VALUE 2P2CC uI
NAMED! TAX/AVER ARE YOU ELIGIBLE FOR A REFUND+ tx
R
To Imd u.It It va-.'It P1190e for
L1IT UP AUUhu1V 1CY ThA Alimmms Proprety TAX Refund ��
24u1 MI UAUiDh 10 Nll out FORM M 1PR us,ng;hcw Anaunts Fs
$T PAUL ?IN 55112 el
1 FdI In th,s Imcunl On Lnr W W.
M
11
PROPERTY ADDRESS •`V
2 FIII In tho Amount on hne 12
HILLY 1tIN rUAU
PAOPfA TY OWNEA _� •CG
CITY OF RUUNDSY It• I.•i.FnRMM:PRIyEX WeEEfAaMbm
24U1 H1UYtYAY lu
S1 PAUL AN 55112
HUNWINT TAX YOUR I TFMI2EO STATEMENT
it dIn'w. a.`s:+M. rr�.••• A•'•"Rwm u.n.m mn a T STATE •EIS OVER • co
AEI ASM IV NIA PAA•ItY)Y rfI.W ECOVNTV .OD
SPECIAL ASAESSMENTI S TOWNSHIP OR CITY . CC,
NAME NO AMOUNT E SCHOOL DISTRICT .00
I OTHER TAKING DIET RICTS
F
t R6RT uu94 81.34
1 TAX •EFDOE CAIDITS • CO
S CNOI711,AH CH NOVCI YOUR TA.
10 TAX Al' cREDns . C 0
It SPIPAI. ASSE45MENTS
A PRINCIPAL d 1. 34
E INTIRIET ' UL
TOTAL-IEI ITEM II I oA. A+lI lit MALT"��► ____
2w HALF STUB .1986
�ICCT .,D .ROrERTY 10f- ;,,,FIC;IIA.I.IIA,
Lo.Nao
E: 933
uC 30 23o22 00
MAIN M TIX/AT{R
CITY OF RuuhusVIEY
24v1 Hl(v"*AT lu
$1 PAUL Rh
WRITE IN ANY NAME AND
U FOR TAX Of►ARTMENT USE ONLY
TOTAL
TAX
It SS 1�1 A:�nP 1'L NAI TV PA` 'IN 101
UCTtWER Ip t.gRl
I V FK•J" • A. w r.. .
R SSCOND 4Ce67
•1 NAI a %TAX
TES
RJuhJS vltX
FAX( CN[CRf PAYABLE TO
pRECTOR ►ROMRTV TAXATION
I]S oplIITNOVfE
�51I2 f1 /AUI. MINNEf01AM104
DF tACH HE RE AND qE IU11N TNlf pRTlON Hn TN ►AYMENT T UUFI CANCELLED CHECX IS YOUR RECEIPT
TAXPAYER' S COPY 6 STATEMENT OF PROPERTY TAX
RETAIN THIS COP. PAYABLE IN1986 RAMSEY COUNTY, MINN.
FDA YOUR N'CORDS
Fs$,4TFAUL
OET6TOC DIS OL ComeNEW IM►ROVEMENTS 79716OG
TID[ 01qIO U� ESTIMATEDMARXETVALUL 319a04C
!3 E! JOs! OIR 621 "ESSED VALUE
NAME 01
OF TAX/ATIR ARETo IYOU E'IGIIBLEEFORI AI REFUN01
TM M"WANEE PlorntT TEX Refund
OFRJURJSVIER d 11 out FORM M- 1PR allnf ttew anlDo",
141WNAT 10 55112
Rh 1 FIp ,n thn amount on lim 10
.cc
IROIf RTY ADDRESS
2 Fdi Ir tnn amount 00 "ne 12
252> 09;m5uh a LVE .00
IgO1E Riv ONNfR
—_ Iro.FGRMM IPq'q[.0 In oO alMbm
CITT OF RUUNI,SVlE4
24U1 HIGMRAY 1J 51112
$1 VAUL hN 1
DELINQUENT TAX U S STATS� R10�
IE Ini. oo+ u cwkw TEw a.w QeI�MgNAI Y.eI �11e •'VY a COUNTY
TOWNSUIF Or CITYSIEC 'AL ASSES{MENT{
{
AMOuhT S. fCN00L Og7R1C7
NAME NO
T OTNIR TAXING DISTRICTS
RA)lL nURT�U„Nv
tl1.34
TOTAI .n ITEM II
-m
E TAX MFORS CREDITS
S CErOITSMMIDEKWCS YWR7M
Ill TAX AFTER CAEOIri
Ill SrECIAL ""SOW""
A PRINCIPAL
E INTSRiST
O 112. TOTAL TAX
. w
.LG
.co
.00
.00
.0C
.
2NO HALF STUB_ • 1986
LDAN co AND ACC, NO I WJPE N I r I *NI
r � �I I •VN rY•
xc T1w AI uTR D
a 30 23 23 aaal
NAME OF TAXPAlllt
C1lY uF huUAu)VILP
C4M4 MII.MPAT I.
)1 FAuL Mh
YNI.1't Ir 1 Y il1UH1 '�'�
a FOR TAX 0 APTMENT USE ONLY
PUUNOS VItP _
--.
MAKE CHECKS FAVABLE TO
DIRECTOR PROPEPTY TAXATION
IA COURTHOUSE
55112
ST PAUL MIN/EEEOTA 56102
144UL MIGMKAY lU /c rTV Mott
WRITE IN ANY NAME
kAND At1DRFSSrHAN1,ES
TOTAL I Q 1. 34
TAX
TU AVJID YLNA.TY YAY UN ON
BEFORE OCTOBER 15 1986
$ECO14XD 4U.ET N
DE TACH HE RE AND RE TARN THIS PORTION FF TH PAYMENT YOUR CANOE L LED CHECK I$ YOUR RECE IPT
TAXMYHIf CCI" E STATEMENT OF PROPERTY TAX
Ill LAIN Irlmicum 1986 sUR YDURRECURJ) PAYABLE IN HAMSkY CUUN1 v, MINN
PwoiRTYIpENTIt ZhTxX. ND r SCHOOL LOAN
sicTWN RtiE OTR ID Cp DIST MMP NEW IMPROVEMENTS
ESTIMATED MARK I T VALUE T%nitlCl
UB
A0 23
23
UUul
U K
Oil
ASSESSEUVALUE
3llPIeu
NAME OF TAXPAYER
ARE YOU ELIGIBLE FOR A REFUNW
'
To l.nd ow ! you're eIIg101e !OI
[ 1 T Y OF MUUhU ) F at P
The MmnewM PropEm Tax Refund
1401 MIGMKAY 1U
hllout FORM IPRus-•Yg them amounts
11 PAUL MN 5511i
1 Fill m Ihn amount on line 10
CC
PROPERTY ADDRESS
•
� F19 �r INH XI)Ounl on IIIIe 12
--
i4u MIGMKAY 10 CIT`• N LL
•CO
PROPERTY OWNEA
—CITY Ur MQt/NU�1110.
nRrp.FORM M-I RFr'RYOtre PKl'dWbm
2401 HIGHWAY 10
$I PAUL MN i911[
DELINQUENT
TAX M
YOuP 16M12ED STATEMENT
.00
D ma
Np. a CNICAMI. Yp. pw im"'KIKI, mus"rMr
$/TATe •BlE OVER
. 00
M'pN
la IFmprppPrM. rellrrq
lr
a COUNTY
5 TOWNSMUORCIrr
6 SCHOOL OISTRICT
T OTHER TAXINO DISTA-CYS
. 00
• ao
.00
VEC AL ASSESSMENTS
NAME
NO
AMOUNT
PA)lt MGMI
CuNY
61.34
• 0[
/ TAX SEFORE CRf DITE
9 CPIEDITSWH,CHPEDIICE YOUR TAX
In TAX AFTER CREDITS I .00
II SPSCIAI ALESSMENT/
i PRINCIPAL @ 1. 34
■ NTERE/T • OO
TOTAL BEE ITEM rI -61. 341 112 TOTAL TAX ��► I P 1 • a•
MI:MO 'ru: t'Lerk-Adminiarr.Itor .Ind City Counci I
FROM: Director of Puhl I,- Works/Community D.-velopm.,n�„�
DATE: March 7, 1986
SUBJECT: PLANNING CAS:: NO. 183-86, MTC PARK AND RIDr1 t'ACILITY
Attached please find the fo1lowin-1:
1. Planninq application dat, t 1/3/S6.
2. Rice C'ru,•k Watershvd D1';I,1.rt I.ef t.•t tl..t •d 1->/L7/tl`..
3. Memo to the Planninq Commission dated lilt+/tl6.
4. Site plan dated 1/6/86.
5. Drawings dared 2/21/86. I t tt
E,. Plenniny 1'�,mmisenn, IL••:nlnf i,.n No.
As you may recall, the City is in the process If zoninq this
iroperty as a Puhlic Facilities District. A parking lot is a
p,-rmitted use in a Public Facilities !:iwtri,r. A public hrarinq
is not required to contruct thin parking lot. We should not
approve this development proposal until the land is zoned as a
Public Facilities District.
The site is not in a wetlend zoning district or a flood plain
area.
The Planning Commission reviewed this application and recommends
approval contingent upon approval fri.m Ramsey County for curb
cuts and approval from the Rice Creek Watershed District for
storm water detention.
RI:COMMENDA'r1DN: I recommend approvintt this prniect per Planning
O.mmiss ion Rrsnlution No. ISf-86 after the property has horn
zoned as a Public Facilities District.
SWT/bac
rn tIv
17 ANNIlw h,l'I•t I LA 11Ut) R lti�rs Onto 14v86
AirLICANT: naw- Nidtr000lit.4n '1'ranl+tt Cammiyuion.___ _ -. ✓t'w"' 4.i1-at!
address S1`: AlCleveland vest Sul, 51AI—_ -
Interest In property (check appropriate box):
❑ owner of record O levee, uperat•+r, manager
13 contract for deed 0"r 13 ayireuent to purchase
p other (explain) ge of Mn/DOT right of rayljoint-usel _
Documentary evidence of apPlicant's interest in Lou, property a" t•:
reyutr+d bclure ti,...l clln •"IiaN..N. M... nyut .t
pNyPtRTY: address/general Icit. atIon Coo V Road 8 i 3SW in MDundsvisw
legal c#swr. name/addrr.e Minnesota ptp�arfatent of Trans rtatt�n
prestnl use (check .it.provriare Wx):
■ undtveluped O bu,iness estatlislt+eut
❑ ;intile farm 1, Js llii [1 inda'.Ui..l r:tahl+siw.ent
U Juplvx dwelIioy O apartment
❑ other
NEyUEST: (explain) to buij�tl /rida.�q_for convenient_tsansfe
fr ty_o auto to bus_for the tranpit user,___.,___,___ _..__
hereby declare that the above statements are t,ur. AOX __ t n
jSijn ture
•- --------=ult fur MTC �--_--
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY:
WE FEES*
subdivision, major
W 5a)
subdivision, minor
(f75) —_
~_
reionlrg
(S50)
conditional use
(650) --_•
variance
($50) _,_
•_
cede appeal
(S50 ._ _ ..
*ease tees in parenlnesis ale non-
refundable.
Pork fund drdicarl,H,
date I,•,- I ..—__..
A701T1/'inl iFtS
puI.I 1C In.eat ln4 ur+t ll.Ca •. __
ni,.,. I tuner:,,• .. .. _._ .
IOTAL FEES IrIV)
date paid r
receipt i — /
Rice Crook wato
75a5 It AINGTON AVENUE NIMirr •,UUr ,ir
ARDEN HILLS MINNESOTA'WI2
mb Deceer 27, 1985 rELEPWAt ibis 403 ana
Mr. Vince Montgomery Berraa Managa,s
Progress Consul tin Engineers, Inc. 2`d81 41hW@0
9 9 9 . ra aro am wearu.rs
6040 Earle Brown Drive al A,W HwS r.rr Ha"
Suite 241
Minneapolis, Minneosta 55430 eoN a roaPE Aamn As
Re: Pre -permit inquiry for a proposed M1C Park and Ride facility one
0.5+ acre site located south of Highway Avenue, between 35W and
Highway 10, Mounds View,
Dear Mr, Montgomery
Receipt is acknowledged of the following exhibits:
Letter of transmittal from Vince Montgomery to John Fanuska, E. A. Hickok
and Associates dated December 12, 1985.
Site Plan for the proposed Park and Ride facility undated and received
December 16, 1985.
Layout and grading plan for MTC Park and Ride facility - Mounds View
undated and received December 16, 1985.
These exhibits have been reviewed and the following comments are made:
1. Permit approval from the Rice Creek Watershed District is required for
this project.
2. The District will require that any grading or filling activity below the
established 100-year floodplain elevation for this site of 878.3 MSL is
prohibited unless compensatory storage is provided. Caiculatiers which
will evaluate the impact of this activity will be required.
Preparation of a sediment -erosion control plan will be necessary which
will retain all sediment on site. This plan must also include an
implementation schedule for erosion control measures including notes
addressing establishment of temporary or permanent vegetative cover at
the completion of grading. In addition, the grading plan for this site
must include stabilization of the outfall west of the site where
stormwater runoff will be discharged from from the parkino area to the
proposed drd indge swa IP,
w Mnt, rN MANArl A-s
A rARDINAL SR iiA SANE* r nq,l
Mr. Vince Montgomery
Page Two
December 27, 1985
4. The om
MN/DOTsforctheill proposedrgradangtactivitiesnwhicchawill takes placer on the
highway right-o'-way.
I have enclosed a permit application, a copy of the RCwD Permit Information
brochure and some standard erosion rontral detail sheets for your use. If you
have any questions or are in need of additional information, please contact us
at 473-4224.
Very truly yours,
EUGENE A. HICKOK AND ASSOCIATES
Engineers for the District
John C. Panuska, CiVi1 Engineer
bt
cc: Board
District Office
F, Murray
Cicy of Mounds V'ew
J
MEMO 10: Planning Crimmission T
FROM: Dirrrror of Public Works/Community la-volopmvnjt4:
/
DAI'E: January 6, 1986
susJF.CT: M.T.U. PARK/RIDE. FACII.11"i
The M.T.C. proposes to install a 52 space park/ride facility on
the south side of County Rudd II, vast of Il1ghway I" end west 'It
1-35W. The park/ride facility will include a 7 toot by 16 font
bus shelter and 2 handicapped parkins spaces. The proposed
facility is not in a wetland or ilon,l pl.iin zone.
�. Concrete curbing with the 11-6-18 design is requirea and not shrwn
on the drawing. The county may want to requir.• the west
entrance/exit be moved a few fret to the west so' that it is
directly across the stre•sr from an intersortinq road, thereby,
reducing traffir hazards. The curb cut!; are designed for buses
and are 24 hoot wide with the appropriate radiuses.
Please note that there are no property lines in this area as far
as I can tell. As far as I know, the Minnesota M-parteN•nr got
Transportation owns this property. The parking spaces closest to
the street have curb and gutter that comes within ID feet of the
\ road surface. The City Codes states that. parking areas may bot
within 5 feet of the property line. Since there is no property
lines, as tar as I ran tell, how far should the closest parking
spaces be to the edge of the rounty road? The boulevard is
normally 11 or 12 feet wide whirh means that the normal parking
spaces are within 16 or 17 feet of the road surface.
One other point is that this area is not zoned at the present
time.
Drawing 113 of 119 shows the lighting plan. This plan, fill all
intent and purposes meets the rode requirements.
'Me plans must tile approved by Ramsey Cnunty and Rice Creek
Watershed District prior to discussion.
SWT/bac
(a1
te4
V*4j,
RF.SOI.OTION No. ISti-B6
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
r00NTY OF RAMSEY
STATE of MINNESOTA
RECOMMENDATION Tr) THE PITY COUNCIL RF.r,ARD1NG MOIINDS VIEW
PLANNING, CASE NO. 183-86, NEI'ROPOLI'rAN rRANSIr COMMISSION
PARK AND RIDE FACrIATY
WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Transit commission (MTC)
has requested City approval to construct a 52-space park and
ride facility near the southeast corner of county Road H and
Highway 10 in the City of Mounds View; and
WHEREAS, ronstruction of this parking lot, as
requested, requires approval of the development; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has n-viewed the
staft report and reviewed information submitted by the
applicant which includes thr- followinq:
1. Development Plan
2. Site Survey
3. Evidence of Site Control; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has also reviewed
this proposal and it is in conformance with all chapters of
the Municipal Code, specifically chapters 40, 42, 49, and
49A and State Statutes; and
WHEREAS, this development shall be appruveu by the
Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) pi inr to construction;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View
Planning Commission recommends approval of Lhe request by
MTC contingent upon appr(ival. from Ramsey rounty for curb
cuts and RCWD for storm water detention;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a development agreement
be entered into between the City and the developer which
includes the following:
Exhibits:
a) Site, Grading and (Itility Plan
b) Development Plan
c) Site Survey
d) Legal Descriptinn
e) Ordinances N,�. 49A 7-Yedr Performance
Bond of $1,000
f) Building Plans anJ Specifications
q) Landscapinq Pl,in
Mounds View Planning Commission
Resolution tin. 156-86
Page Two of Two
2. Security for the development in an im:.unt to
be determined.
3. Exhibit 2A to require the follnwinq:
a) Paved parking area to use H-6-18 curbing.
b) Approval from Rice Creek Watershed District
prior to constriction.
c) Approval l i ,.m R.uw:ey i'. atii l y I �,r .0 -rr•a I n
County Road H prior to contruction.
d) Payment of all City expenses above and beyond
amounts previously submitted.
e) Other items as may b. required by the City
Council.
f) A pay telephone shall he installed.
q) Curb and gutter for parking spaces shall be a
minimum of Ib font from thy• odoe of the
existing bituminous on ('runty Road It.
h) Applicant shall construct skimming device that
satisfies City Code requirements.
BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning
Commission directs staff to forward this resolution to the
City Council prior to approval of the minutes.
A'rTFST:
(SEAL)
Adopted this 5th day of March, 1966.
Chairman
Director of Public Works/
Community Development
u
zi e�tfi1—L +irttrt���
+ rt-+— f-- --► —F `.o.
T—E—I—I— VA � "t
I- 4 L� j-T 4-t—�44—4—+-4J
1jLLLLLLLLLL►-j-j-jJ_._l-j rp
C •
r � PJ WN t.Jr---� !� •
rayj •
rjig
I 1-`
E
O1faa
11111111
:a7:At
\ f
1 1
f
i.,1..
IN 1 0
a
JI'
9
I/
.A,� /y
MEMO T0: Clerk -Administrator and City Council
FROM: Director of Public Works/Community Development
DATE: March 6, 1986
SUBJECT: SELF-SERVICE CAR WASH AT 2135 PROGRAM AVENUE
Attached please find the following:
1. Staff report dated 2/19/86.
2. Planning application dated 2/7/86.
3. Rice Creek Watershed District letter dated 1/31/85.
4. Planning Commission Resolution No. 154-86.
5. Site plan and elevations dated 2/6/86.
The Planning Corzissicn recommends approval of this planning
application. The applicant will attend the City Council agenda
session on March 17, 1986. In order to speed up the approval
process the Planning Commission recommends setting a public
hearing for 7:05 p.m. on April 14, 1986.
SWT/bac
END JJFVATqu _
UM (NVATION
�-H-i �-13=1 rii3 �3Z
NOWT tUVATION FLOOR PLAN _
SRE /IAN
�rw
. rrwcir^N�
..waw• aM
4— .J *n"
METROWASH
-Ow fflw
w• WTA
NMiKiW
rwe w��m r
t=}�S t.SL �•
S TA F F Cif4 of Mounds View
REPORT I
PLANNING CO ISSION REVIEW DAM Pebniary 19, 1986
AGENDA ITEM NIMUR: 4
CASE NUMBER: 185-86
APPLICANT: Bruce Holton
:.� PROPOSED REQUEST: Applicant requests development
J review approval to construct a 4,000 square foot self-
service car wash.
W LOCATION OF REQUEST: 2135 Program Avenue
W
SITE SIZE: 20,000 square feet (0.45 acres)
LOT DEPTH AND NII1TH:
i..l 163.64' x 82.34' x 182.11' x 170.69'
LLW
//P"^
V/
0
z
EXISTING ZONING: B-3, Highway Business District
CONTIGUOUS LAND USE: B-3
CONFORMANCE TO COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN: Requr-z
conforms.
ZONING CONFORMANCE TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Zoning
conforms provided the applicant secs -fires a conditional
use permit.
sTAPP REPORT PAGE Two or THREF:
CASE. NO. 185-86 ,
SjrMCKS
Proposed structures, paving and nirblng satisfy setback
requirements.
ACCESS
Tne applicant proposes a one-way entrance on Program Avenue and a
one-way ex.t on Program Avenue.
DRAINAGE
Approval from Rice Creek Watershed District is not required (see
attachment). The applicant's storm water detention pond will be
installed on the south side of the site and the design will be
approved by the City Engineer prior to City Council approval.
PARKING
The applicant proposes 2 parking spaces and 8-6-18 curb and
gutter. The 2 parking spaces and curb and quttPr satisfy City
Code requirements.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
City Code requires the City Council to conduct a public hearinq
on the conditional use permit. In order for a car wash to be
installed in a B-3 zoninq district., the site must receive a
conditional use permit from the City. The requirements are
listed in City Code Chapter 40.18, Subd. D(2l. I will summarize
the requirements of this section of the CitV rode as follows:
a) Architectural appearance shall he similar to existing
building in the area.
b) The application shall proviae stacking space to
accommodate the number of vehicles that can he washed
during a maximum 30 minute period. The applicant will be
submitting this shortly to the City Engineer for approval.
c) Additir,nal screening is required when development is next
to a residential district.
d) Each light standard island and all islands in the parking
lot shall be landscaped or covered.
e) Pertains to screening residential districts.
f) Applicant satisfies with these requirements. .
g) Applicant will satisfy these requirements.
STAFF REPORT
CASE NO. ISS-86
PAGE THREE OF THREE
h) All lighting shall he hooded and not visible from pub] i,:
riqht-of-wav•
i) These requirements are satisfied.
j) All signs will comply with the Mounds View Siqn Code.
k) Are noise control provisions adequate?
1) Are provisions of Section 40.25, SuM . Ai5) of this Code
satisfied?
CURB AND GUTTER
The applicant shall install cross curb and getter .it each
entrance per the City Engineer's recommendations.
GARBAGE DISPOSAL
Are the provisions for garage disposal adequate?
ATTACHMENTS
Attached please find the following:
1. Application dated February 7, 1986.
2. Letter from Rice Creek Watershed Distri,t dated January
31, 1985.
3. Site and elevations plans.
4. An 11 page booklet tiescribing tha self-s-rvice car wash
operation.
SAND AND SUDS TRAP
The applicant shall submit drawings of the sand and suds trap
they propose to install For each bay. Their deaige of the sand
and suds trap shall be approved by the rity Engineer prior to
City Council approval.
SPRINKLER SYSTEM
A tire sprinkler system may be requirod by the City Code.
WATER AND SEWER SERVICE
City water and sewer service is available in the street.
PLANING API'l1:AIIrIN D.rte _7- /7 Y
•
APPLJ CANE: nacre '6aUXF, L T l.J -.. .. ..-- - phGre 7 B F • 4 , j
address ZS VS J •77_ �ds.44% a .l• , - ��y _rkir� V% &ere _
Interest In properly (check appropriate to.).
O owner of record 91 le •:er, upreatur, xu,nager
O contract for dued o,rner, AlCagter•.ent lu purchase
O other (explain) .......
Documental) evidence of applicant'% interest in the property r.ay t-
reqtlired before final city actiun on lhi% Inquest.
I'R01'Lr,rY: oidrobs/general 1,Kaliun - Nit /1i✓ /U. Lo 000 �•
!a 2 bbele r�o a r..r.o t••- d f r ,err, It..: _ --
legal owner: naee/address
present use (check appropriate box):
�undrveloped fJ business establishwent
O single fain;ly dwellmi O industrial establishment
❑ duplex dwrl tiny U •µ.anmrnt.
n other (explain)
nEQUEST: (explain) Ree,?( �it�-l!<N 8-- x;3L� ilS2aJr'.L
e.erL----
I hereby declare that the above staters nls srt• II w'.x+r
-j:iynature�
FOR OFFILf US[ ONLY:
BASE FEES"
subdivision, awior
("IW)
subdivision, minor
($75)
rezoning
(S50)
conditional use
($50) • SD
_
variance
($5U) -_�-
code appeal
($50)
Subtutal
*Base fees In parenlheslb arc ni,n
refundable.
Park fund dedication `�--
date pail _.—..
Ar,G,III9-d IILS
.a I : i•cs
•.r fl. ..r,..It..•,t revl.ws
q.
sub tor.,I _
IOTAL FFIS $fSV
date paidJ/.7-!.Y
rccripr 0 �req.
73
iww ^rw wii ��r.�♦wr
&"%Pw 111110111, 4G4cA TVaKa
35M LfxINf,TON AVE NOE WR!H SUITE all!
AADEN HILLS WP.NESO'A 551!e
TEIEPHt)NE m IZ 442 0614
January 31, 1Q85
Mr. Dave Brellenthin
Davies Water Equipment Company
4010 Lake Breeze Avenue
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55429
1
Board of MAn490la
Hey,111 41h weo
7rq and Aln WadnauJ•rf
al Arden HWa City HAW
BONNIE TOAPf. Adm.n A,$ I
Re: Pre -Permit Inquiry concerning the proposed development of Lot 2, Block 2,
Programed Land Ist Addition, 0.5 + acres, located In the northwest
quadrant of the Intersection of Highway Avenue and 1-35W in Mounds View
Dear Mr. Brellenthin:
Receipt is acknowledged of your letter with attached copy of the Preliminary
Plat of Programmed Land 1st Addition, both undated and received January 16,
1985. Based on our review of these exhibits and conversations with you, it
appears tnat none of the conditions which would require permit approval, as
identified 1n the RCWO Permit Information Sheet revised January 1, 1984, exist
at the site. Therefore, please be Informed that a permit is not required from
the District for the proposed development of this int.
If you have any questions, please contact us at 473-4224.
Very truly yours,
EUGEME A. MICKOK AND ASSOCIATES
Engineers for the District
04-4.4. t� 1�4
Steven G. Muller, P.E.
crs
cc: Board of Managers
RCWO District Office
F. Murray
City of Mounds View
BOARD Or AAIMI;f RS
A CARDINAL SA DUNE N IIARSTAO c T KIWI.
AIK/1A 4 Ir IYyar ({ " aYar lhlft 11
111 V.OTT SR EA PIT TRAWd10
AA IY. Ilk .II M{A1A {NyI,H
PLANNING APPIKAIIIIN Date W- /7 1a.
•
i
APPLICANT: name �(Lac tL t""JW'u'n 7(r! 4 r3'r
address 25OS -277— A.,d aft• - `mil . r# +rio�y�p�_ -
Interest In pre. party (check appruprier•• tnri _ -
O owner of record O Ie,ser, upetetur, manager
O contract fur dead oarwr .F>[ayrre••rnt to Purchase
O other (explain)
Documentary evidunce of applicant's intrr.•st in the property ray t
required before final city actiun on thi♦ request.
PNOPEATY: address/general Irxatiun - AIiA2 /Y/.✓ /D l Go 04 v6/.
Ja ►t 2- s b4cdL 2 , Crae j,r wraw A* Lem. / r y „ / 4r if ; _ -
legal osnkr: name/addrr%s _ r�.�A�.wIO_�A.•i� s-±!.•
present use (check appropriate bnx):
undeveloped 171 bu••iness establishownt
O single family dwell;n.t O indu•.trial rstahlishment
O duplex Jwellin!: V µ.drimrut•
O other (explai„)
rdQUEST: (explain)
CAW dors.r/r.. .
I hereby declare that rite above stat.r.anr• .n t+u.
r0A OFFlcf USE ONLY:
OASE FCESa
subdivision, Wier (we150)
subdivision, mlrurr ($75)
reaoni"I ($SO)
conditional use mn) _Zty
variance MW __ y
code appeal ($50) —•_—,_
subtutal
*Use fees in parenthesis are non
refundable.
Park field dedication r_-
date paid
—(Signawre)
pr,l.l i• +w-.,r IPA i.ril ir,;}
•.t !f, urn�.ull.rq reri.,r: �+_?t.,t%D
ai•.� rlldru•r.u•
subtnlal
TOTAL FEIS •%&Sp
date pall �1ij i r
receipt / Z )VO4
RESOLUTION NO. 154-86
CITY OF MOUNDS VILW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL REGARDING MOUNDS VIEW
PLANNING CASE NO. 185-66, BRUCF. HOLTON
WHEREAS, Bruce Holton has requested City approval to
construct a self -serve car wash in the City of Mounds View
at 2135 Program Avenue; and
WHEREAS, construction of this facility, as requested,
requires approval of the development, and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the
staff report and reviewed information submitted by the
applicant which includes the following:
1. Development Plan
2. Site Survey
3. Evidence of Site Control; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has also reviewed
this proposal and it is in conformance with all chapters of
the Municipal Code, specifically Chapters 40, 42, 49, and
49A and State Statutes, and
WHEREAS, this development will be reviewed and
approved by the Pice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) prior
to construction;
WHEREAS, the storm water control wall be approved by
the City Engineer prior to City Council approval; and
WHEREAS, the applicant's proposal satisfies vehicie
stacking requirements of the City Code;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE I1 RESOLVED that the Mounds View
Planning Commission recommends approval of the request by
Bruce Holton;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a development agreement
be entered into between the City and the developer which
includes the following:
1. Exhibits:
a) Site, Grading and Utility Plan
hl rbvelonment Plan
c) Site Survey
d) Legal Description
e) Ordinances No. 49A 7-Year Performance
bond of 51,000
Mounds Viow Planning Cnmmka i.-n
Resolution No. 154-86
Page Twn of Twn
f) Buildinn Plans and SpertficAtions •
q) Landscaping Plan
2. Security for the development in an amount to he
determined.
3. Exhibit 2A to require the following:
a) Paved parkinq area to use 0-6-18 curbing.
h) Concrete cross rurh and qutt-i- shall be
installed at the entrance and th.r exit.
c) Payment of all City expenses above and beyond
amounts previously submitted.
d) Other items as may be required by the City
Council.
e) A light shall also be installed on the east
side of the hnildinq. The light shall not
shine onto the exit ramp.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning
Commission recommends that a ronditinnal use permit he
granted which includes the above itom!e and the t.,llowing
items:
1. Trees and shrubs shall he properly maintained. •
2. Garbage cans and trash shall be IocAted inside
the trash enclnsure.
3. If the business closes and is not reopened within
one year, the conditional use permit is null and
void.
4. An attendant shall he on duty for a minimum of 4
hours per day. If there is a health, safety,
welfare or nuisance problem, the number of hours
an Attendant is on duty sh-ill ho revised by the
City.
BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that the Mnunds View Planning
Commission directs staff to forward this resolution to the
City Council prior to approval of the minutes.
ATTEST:
Adopted this 5th day of March, 1966.
Challei n
(SEAL)
Director of Public Works/ -
Community Development
mane ro:
Clerk -Administrator
and City C,um"l
.I
FROM:
Director of PuhIir
Works/Commun i:y
1)..V.. I,) pment'14
DATE: March J, 1906
sm.lf.vr: INSURANCF: RF.00rRF(MEN'r:; FOR LIt'ENSING :'WRAcroRS
I believe we ghoold consider reducing the amount of insurance
that the CitY rode presently requires huildinq contractors to
maintain to receive a license in the Citv of A-wnds View. I
believe we should reduce the requirements her other cities
have logs strict requirements and insurance costs have
skyrocketed. Attached please find a survey of the insurance
requirements neighhorinq cities have for licensed eortractors.
City Code Chapter 60.03, Subdivision 9, states that public
liability insurance should not he less than $250,000 for
injuries, includinq accidental death to any one person and,
subject to the same limit for each person, to an amount of not
legs than $500,000 on account of any ona ac,-ident, and property
damage insurance in the amount of not less than $50,000. The
survey indicates that most other cities have insurance
requirements of $100,000, $300,000 and $50,00U.
The Siqn Code (Chapter 39) is the only other chapter in the City
Code that insurance requirements for contractors are mentioned.
Ci-/ Code Chapter 39.07 has the same requirements as Chapter 60.
I recommend changing Chapter 39.07 to state that the insurance
requirements for constructinq signs shall be the same as the
insurance requirements in city Code Chapter 60.03, Subdivision 9.
RECOMMENDATION: I recommend the :nsuranre requirements for
licensing contractors be reduced from $250,000, 5500,00 and
$50,U00 to $100,000, SlU0,000 and $50,000 bc,�ause this will match
other cities' requirements and will help reduce the cost of
insurance for huildinq enntractors and, hence, the cost of
construction in the City of Mounds View.
SWT/bac
Attachment
IAIIIIARY, 19d3
IN5U1<ANCE HEVUIHI'MISN'I ['ON CON'I'HACTUH LICENSES
FOR VARIOUS CITIES WITHIN THE METROPOLITAN AREA
Per Person
per occurrence
Arden Hills
S 25,000
$IUU,UuU
Blaine
50,000
100,000
Circle Pines
100,000
1Vu, ODD
(plus $2,000 bond)
CUU❑ 1(d I,1'IS
"Of 111111
1110, u1111
Fridley
50,000
100,000
Mapleffluo l
IOU, till()
to), 11114)
(plus $5,000 bond
for sewer)
Minneapolis (General)
LOU, UUU
300,000
MOUNDS VIEW
250,000
5UU,000
New Brighton
50,000
100,000
Roseville
300,000
i00,000
St. Paul (General)
25,000
SU,000
(All Others)
100,000
300,J00
Shoreview
100,000
300,000
Spring Lake Park
100,000
300,000
White Bear Lake
25,000
S,i,000
propor I
Damp _
20,000
5U,U0u
10,000
50 , 0'
25,Ut
100,0110
5,0u0
50,000
25,000
50,Ou0
10,0u0
MEMO TO: Clerk -Administrator and City Council I
FhUM: Director of Public works/Community Davolup"f .t- /
DATE: March 7, 1986
SUBJECT: M.S.A. STREET PROJECT 1986
Attached please find a resolution hanninq parking on the south
side of county Road H-2 from T.H. 10 to Quincy Street. .As you
may recall, in crder to construct a 36 foot M.S.A. street,we must
ban parking on one side of the street. This resolution bans
parking on the south side of the street.
RECOMMENDATION: T recommend approvinq Resolution No. 1987 which
bans parking on the south side of County Road H-2 trom 'I.H. 10 to
Quincy Street.
SFrr/bac
RESOLJ1,10N NO. 1987
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW •
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION RELATING TO PARKING RESTRICTICNS ON S.A.P.
146-234-02 FROM STATE HIGHWAY 10 TO QUINCY STREET IN
THE CITY OF MOUNDS ViEW, MINNESOTA
THIS RESOLUTION passed this day of
1986, by the City of Mounds View in Ramsey County Minnesota.
The Municipal Corporation shall hereinafter be called the "City",
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the "City" has planned the improvement of MSAS
234 (County Road H-2) from State Highway 10 to Quincy Street; and
WHEREAS, the "City" will be expending Municipal State Aid
Funds on the improvement of this street; and
WHEREAS, this improvement does not provide adequate width
for parking on both sides of the street- and
WHEREAS, approval of the proposed construction as a Municipa
State Aid Street project must therefore be conditioned upon certain
parking restrictions; and
WHEREAS, the extent of these restrictions that would be
a necessary prerequisite to the approval of the construction as a
Municipal State Aid project in the "City", has been determined.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED that the 'City" shall
ban the parking of motor vehicles on the south side of MSAS 234
(County Road H-2) at all times.
Adopted this day of
Attest:
(SEAL)
1986.
yor
Clerk-Adm_nrstrator
0
MEMO 10: Clerk -Administrator and City Council
FROM: Director of Puhlic Wcrks/Commur,i;; Developme44
DATE: March 12, 1986
SUBJECT: STREET SWEEPING BIDS
The City opened bids for sprinq street sweeping on March 4,
1996. The City received the following bids:
1. Foss Sweepinq S43.00/hour
2. American Sweepers, Inc. $46.25/hour
3. Allied Blacktop Company $49.50/hour
4. Clean Sweep $52.00/hour
5. Crosstown Sweeping $54.00/hour
The bidders were required by the request for bids to submit a bid
security in the amount of 5 percent of the bid. The bid security
was not provided by any of the bidders. Therefore, I called the
two low bidders and asked them to provide a bid security. I also
asked them if they could lower their bid price.
Foss Sweeping and American Sweepers, Inc. provided bid security.
Foss Sweeping indicated that his price of $43.00 per hour is the
lowest price he can provide. American Sweepers, Inc. provided a
bid price of $42.50 per hour if the City swept the streets in the
sprinq and the fall. American Sweepers, Inc. indicated in
writing that they would sweep the streets in the sprinq only for
$42.50 per hour.
American Sweepers, Inc. cleaned our streets las'. year for $46.50
per hour. They are a reputable contractor and do quality work.
RECOMMENDATION: I recommend awardinq 1986 sprinq sweeping to
American Sweepers, Inc. for S42.50 per hour for a not to exceed
price of $4,600.00.
SWT/bac
I
H
As i 1AMERICAN SWEEPERS INC.
73I *INNETBA AVENUE NORTH WLAAN VAL�Er MINNESOTA %4J/
612 545 1118
March 3, 1986
Mr. Steven W. Thatcher
City of Mounds View
2401 Highway 10
Mounds View, MN 55112
Dear Mr. Thatcher;
Thank you for your letter requesting quotations for street sweeping in
the City of Mounds View. We —will furnish one Elgin pelican sweeper
operator, fuel at the rate of 46.25 per h 'total not to exceed $4625.00
for sweeping all municipal streets.
Uur aiternate bid iur sweeping in the spring and fall is($42.50 per hr\
A certificate of insurance will be furnished to you upon acceptance of
our Quotation,
Sincerely,
American Sweepers Inc
>�-�g
HL/1st
MUNICIPAL • ROADWAYS • PARKING AREAS • GARAGES • PARKING AREA MAAA NG
A S I AMERICAN SWEEPERS INC.
731 wINNEt NA AVENUE NORTH GOIOEN VAi IFr MINNESOTA SNh ,
612 545 1116
March 12, 1966
M r . Steven W . Thatcher
City of Mounde View
2401 Highway 10
Mounds View, MN. 55112
Dear Mr. Thatcher.
As per our telephone conversation March 10, 1966, we will
extend to you our Spring and Fall quotation. of $42.50 per
hour to your Spring clean up.
Sincerely,
.g - -
H1 ihct
Is
MUNICIPAL 0 ROADWAYS • PARKING AREAS • GARAGES • PARKING AREA MARKING
FOSS SlILLPI9G
3853 39tG, Avenue South
Minneapolis, Tlinnesota 55436
724-8597
Marc:i 10, 1986
To: City of .+founds View
2401 ❑iyhway 10
Mounds View, Minnesota 55112
did Proposal for street sweeyinq City of mound, View:
Rate - $43.00 per nour; total charou not to exceed $4,600.00
Lynn n. toss, 'rimer/��e7rator
FOSS SWEEPING ,
3853 39th Avcnuc South
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55406
724-8597
February 21, 1986
RIO PROPP"A1,
TO: City of 4oun0s View
2401 I.i(;hvay 10
Mounds View, '4innesnta 55112
Rid Proposal for Street Sweeping - Cit/ of •tnumis View
Equipment_
Elgin Pelican Sweeper
Rate:
�-00_per hour � Total number of hours not to
exceed 120 hours
Lynn A. Pass, Owner%Operator
•
r
�diNNF5014
W1111"Ied
Gllacklcof�
Co
BITUMINOUS CONTRACTORS
February 26, 1986
Mr Steve Thetcher
City of Mounds View
MI Highway 10
Mounds view, MN 55112
Re: Equipment Rental Quotes for I'h, .Street Sweepinq N .
Dear Steve,
Thank you for allowing us to quote cn this year's stye-t sweeping program.
The machines that we will be using for this service are as follows:
(2) 1982 Rosco hydrostatic; cab enclosed, one-way brooms.
(These machines are faster and more economical in rural -type
a,:eas where there 1s no curb and gutter.)
(7) Elgin Pelican (1980 thru 1986) Street Sweepers.
The personnel that operate these machineb are professlonal, hazing the ability
to repair and maintain their own machines. Most of our operators have been
with Allied for many years and their primary dutv is running brooms and sweepers.
I've mentioned our late m)del, top -conditioned and professionally operated
ma& ines not to boast, but to assure you that you can have clean streets with
the least possible machine hours.
Our rates for these machines, including operator's wage, are:
one-way broom - $38.00 per hovr
Elgin Pelican Sweepers 49.50 per hour
It's been our pleasure working with your fine community, either seal coating,
and/or sweeping in past years. We're honing to see you again soon.
Thank yju,
n
Gene Capistrant
WC: pjo
(612) 425-0575
j�3�ftAve. No. Made Grove, MN
55369
MEMO 1D: Clerk -Administrator And City Council
FROM: Director of Public Works/Com:munity Ikevelopmen %/
DATE: March !2, 1986
SUBJECT: CHLORINE EQUIPMENT FOk WATEk TREATMENT PLANT NO. 1
Attached please find two quotes her chlorine equlpmt•nt tot Water
Treatment Plant No. 1. The quotes are as follows:
1. Vessco, Tnr. $5 ,0''i4,1111
2. Layne Minnesota Cu. $6,996.0U
Vessco, Inc. provided an additionAl quote fnr the subject
equipment in an amount of $4,713.UO. This quote includes 6 of
their new qas vacuum solenoid valves. If this alternate is
awarded, the City will save $346.UU on the purchase of chlorine
equipment, but the City will have to spend approximately $500.00
to modify the control panel. sinro rho tl,j, vacuum soL•noid
valves are new to the market place and do not have a lonq track
record, they could be expensive to maintain and create problems
in the future.
The equipment is needed because we do not chlorinate the water
prior to the filter or chlorinate the water after the filter per
Minnesota Department of Health requirements.
The purchase of this equipment iS in the 1986 Capital Improvement
and Repair Budqet. The account number is 700-122-4123.
RECOMMENDATION: I recommend purchasing the subject chlorine
equipment from Vessco, Inc. in the amount of $5,059.OU.
RIIT/bac
Attachments
LAY N E M I N N ES O TA a wA'ER WELLS • WATER TREATMENT
e PUMPS • DRILLED PIER FOUNDATIONS
3147 CALIFORNIA ST NE I' IUD
I��yU ���
MINNEAPOLIS. MN 55418 `{ lJ WWW WWW
16121 781-9553
DATE FEBRUART 25 19 86
TO; CITY OF MOUNDSVIEN
2401 HIGHWAY 10
ST. PAUL, MN 55112
ATTN: STEVE THATCHER
WEGsu;Ai UUaNTITr
SECTKA
P.EFERINCL:
pEgtNWIruN
DEAR STEVE:
HERE ARE THE PRICE QUOTES YOU ASKED FOR PER MY VISIT
2/24/86.
2 SERIES 50-345 TWO -CYLINDER SCALE.
INCLUDES: SCALE AND SET OF INSTRUCTIONS.
2 SERIES V-100A MASTER LONTROL UNIT PACKAGE
3 SERIES V-1000 MULTIPLE -POINT -OF -APPLICATION PACKAGE
2 SERIES V-I000 AUTOMATIC SW!TCHOYEK PACKAGE
11 i AURORA BOOSTER PUMP 1150 RPM
MODEL 15. 5 HP 230/460 VOLTAGL
NOTE: THIS BOOSTER PUMP 15 DESIGN,D TO FEED TWO INJECTORS
AT 7-1/2 GPM @ 350 T.D.H
EN Standard con6tlions p1 sales on fora! sine
TERMS NET 30 DAYS SHIPMENT PA AS ABOVE
1 NW I
S1,100.00
970.00
1,176.00
1,360. '
SHIPPING DETAILS F.O.B. SHIPPING POINT LA 41W*SOTA COWIP
Plnasc, sign and return copy wren aptimyn] 8y�
ACCEPTED FOR THE PURCHASER iB Title
By TITLE Page 1 of 1
\01111100
U/"aow .r•L.1,,,,.1,,, • , sn ,..., •,,
.111,111eL1 11..19 \\.,6, �i ,�, !', �! I du . • i
March 1, 1986
City of Mounds View
2401 Nighwav 010
Mounds View, Minnesota 55112
Attention: Mr. Steve Thatcher
Dear Mr. Thatcher:
Wp are pleased to offer our proposal for the following Wallace and
Tiernan Chemical Feed Equipment as discusses per our Meeting cf March 6,
1986.
We quote as follows
1 - Lot Wallarp and Tiernan Chlorination equipment consisting of the
following:
2 - V-100A Master control units
3 - V-100D Auxilliary units
2 - V-100C Auto switch/over packages
2 - 50-345 Two cylinder scales
2 - Chlorine booster pumps
5 - Chlorine injector assembiies with throat and lailpleres
We offer the above descrfted equipment for the net sun price of . .$5,059.00.
Alternate - Lot Wallace and Tiernan Chlorination Equipment incorporating
Wallace and Tiernan Multiple Rate Chlorination System. The multiple rate
system for three (3) wells - pre & post - chlorination consists of the
following:
2 - V-100A Master control units
3 - V-100D Auxilliary units
1 - V-200C Auto switch/over pacxage
1 - 50-345 Two cylinder scalp
6 - Gas vacuum solenoid valves
2 - Chlorine booster pumps
2 - Chlorine injectors with throat A tailplp'^s
ye[Othe above described alternate equipment for thr net sum price of
Sincerely yours,
SCO INC.
Warner
GM/jee
I
I
i
MEMO TO: Clerk -Administrator and City Council
FROM: Director of Public Works/Community Development
DATE: March 12, 1986
SUBJECT: WATER TREATMENT PLANT NO. 1 CONfROLS
The City opened the followinq bids at 10:00 a.m, today for the
subject project:
Deductive Base Sid
Base Bid Alternate Minus Alt. 41
1. Pierson -Wilcox $6i,849.00 $5,I95.0U S56,654.0U
Electric Co., Inc.
2. Kehne Electric Co. $65,474.00 $4,918.00 $6U,556.00
3. Gopher Electric $72,794.00 $5,476.00 $67,318.UU
Jim Rudku of Toltz, Kinq, Duvall a Anderson (T.K.D.A.) states
that Pierson -Wilcox Electric Co.'s work has been satisfactory and
that they are a reputable contractor.
Pierson -Wilcox Electric Co. offered an additional deduct of
$4,400.00 if the square D brand reduced voltage starter is equal
to the Allan-Rradley reduced voliane starter. T.K.D.A. indicated
that this equipment is equal and the deduct can be accepted by
the City of Mounds View.
Deductive Alternate 41 is to not replace the water level
transmission and rereivinq equipment for Water Tower No. 2. The
low bidder's deduct is $5,195.00 for this alternate. Staff
repaired this equipment in 1985. This equipment works
satisfactorily at the present time. If the repaired
equipment fails to the near furure, we can replace it at that
time.
The need for the control system improvements has been documents1
by a T.K.D.A. report. The control system for Water Treatment
Plant No. 1 needs replacement becaoee the existing control system
is not functioninq properly. Staff has tried to repair the
control system, but it continues to fail.
The 1986 Water Capital Improvement and Maintenance budget has
sufficient funds to pay for this improvement.
RECOMMENDATION: I recommend awardinq the contract to
Pierson -Wilcox Electric Co. I also recommend. Deductive Alternate
No. l in the amount of $5,195.00 and awarding the additional
deduct of $4.400.00. Therefore, 1 recommend awardinq this work
to Pierson -Wilcox Electric Co in the amount of $52,254.00
($61,849.OU minus $5,195.00 minus $4,4UO.UU).
SWT/bac
PMRSON-WIWO% ELECTiiIC CO..INC.
ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS
I Cut Nlnsteentn Street -
unneepone, Minnesota 65403 0 d w '.
VOLUNTARY ALTERNATES
Option M1
An .Allen-Hradley reduced voltage starter is specified
for `IS -I. If ;in equivalent starter mannra,tured by Square r)
Company is a suitable alternate, please deduct from the
base bid:
Lot Deduct 54,4on.no
Option 0?
If a Squire n, solid state reduced voltage starter (refer
to the attached literature) is substituted for the specified
:Men Bradley unit (MS-1) please deduct from the base hid:
Lot Deduct 13,216.00
SINCE 1899--IUAL040 CONTRACIURS ANu ENGINEERS
SPECIALISTS IN ENERGY MANAGEMENT
Dote `larch 12, 19116 , 1986
To: Honorable Mayor and City Damftll
City of Mounds Ytew, Minnesota
We have examined the site of work and have familiarized ourselves with the
drawings and speclflcatlons pertaining to the work. We propose to furnish
all labor, materials, equipment, skills and facilities required for the
complete and satisfactory municipal water system electrical Improvements,
as set forth In the specifications prepared by Toltz, King, Duvall,
Anderson and Associates, Inc. for the respective prices set forth
hereinafter.
We understand that all Bid Proposal Items must be filled -in for our bid to
be considered responsive to the Aavertlsemel.t for Bias.
1
BASE 3117 ,
For the complete Improvement project shown and spec IfIoa, the lump sum of:
Sixty One thousand f.i ht Hundred Dollars (Shl,949.00
arty- Inc TIO11a.
ALTERNATE No. 1
To omit Elevated Tank No. 2 level transmission and receiving equipment
replacement, deduct the imp sue of:
rive Thousand One Hundred Ninety- Dollars IS5,1g5.nn
t VC
VOTE:
Please see Voluntary Deducts on the attached sheet
II
5b27
Dote ?larch. 12.
Tc: Honorable Mayor and City iuuncll
City of Mounds ylew, Minnesota
We have examined the site of work and nave faaillarized ourselves with the
drawings and speclf icatlons pertaining to the work. We propose to firm Sh
all labor, motor Ials, equipment, skills and facIIItlas required for the
compi eta and satisfactory municipal water system electrical Improvements,
as set forth In the specifications prepared by Toltz, king, Duvall,
Anderson and Associates, Inc. for the respective prices set forth
hereinafter.
We understand that all 8 1 d Proposal Items must be filled - In for our bid to
be considered responsive to the Advertisement for Bids.
F�epcomp I?te Improvement project shown a n 0 specified, the lump sum of:
SIXTY FIVE THOUSAND FOUR KIINDRED--DpIIKs (s65,474.00 )
SEVENTY TUR--- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
� TElevated Tank No. 2 level transmissirin and receiving equipment
replacement, deduct the lump sum of:
FOUR THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED ETGH'PEEN Dollars (f4.918.00 ).
8627
Deft Mir:h 12 1966
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of Lunas view, Minnesota
We have exmmined the site of work and hove fecillarizec ourselves With the
drawings and speclllcatlons pertaining to the work. Me propose to furnish
all labor, materiels, equipment, skills and facllltles required for the
complete a:c :dtisfactory municipal water system electrical Improvements,
as set forth In the specifications prepared by Toltz, King, Duvall,
Anderson and Associates, Inc. for the respective prices set forth
hereinafter.
We understand that all Bic Proposal Items must be filled -In for our bid to
be considered responsive to the Aavertlscment for Bids.
F�pcamplete Improvement project shorn and specified, the lump sum of: ,
Seventy Two Thousand evan Hundred hYnrty £eur --
Dollers (ft�
ALTERNATE ND I
To omit Elevated Tank No, 2 level transmission and receiving equipment
replacement, deduct the lump sum oft
t ive Thwsand four Hundred severty Six
Dollars ($5-416.o0 I.
(:CIPHER ELECTRIC CONTRACTOR:;, iN,,
1406 Coon Rapids Blvd.,
Coo Rapids, tv $5033
Carl H. Gause, Jr,
LHi1/, Ih
1
862'
MEMO TO: Cleik-Admilusu alur and CiL� COUnCLI
FROM: Director of Publis Works/Community Uevelopmenti i-
�!/ {M
DATE: March 10, 19d6
SUBJECT: STOPM WATER AND WETI.AND MANAGEMENT PLAN
Attached please find the Storm Water and Wetlnad Management
Plan dated February 3, 1936.
A summary of this report is located on Paae 1. We can
discuss this report at the March 17, 19d6, Agenda Session.
SWT/bac
CICY OF MOUNDS VIKW
STORM WATER AND liVI'LAND MANACIAFNI' PLAN
FEBRIIARY 1, 1986
PREPARFO BY
S'fKVF.N W.-PMKfI'BFR
PUBLIC WORKS OIRECI'Oli
MOUNDS VIEW PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTF1h:N1'
I N D r X
1.
SUMMARY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . 1
II.
HACXGRUIIND, PROBLEM S'rATF'MFNI' AND PURPONI . . . . .
. . 2
III.
EX Is I -I N(; FAC!I, 1'I-II"; . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . 4
IV.
POSSIBLE SOLOTIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . 4
I. Sturm Sewer Maintenance . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . 4
2. Storm Sewer Improvements . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . 5
3. Ditch Ma i ntonancr. . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . 7
4. Wetland Preservation/M.iint.•earo,.• . . . . . . . .
. . 8
V.
ESTIMATED COSTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . 9
I. Storm Sewer Maintvnanv. .. . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . 9
2. Storm Sewer Improvemonts . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . 9
3. Ditch Maintenance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . 9
4. Wetland Preservation/Maintenance . . . . . . . .
. 11
5. Cnst Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. ll
VI.
F(INDINC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . Il
1. Storm Sewer Maintenance . . . . . . . . . .
. . ll
2. Storm Sewer improvement and Ditch Maintenance .
. . 12
V1I.
DISCUSSION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . 14
VIII.
CONCLUSIONS AND RF.COMMFNDA'rTONS . . . . . . . . . .
. . 15
APPENDIX 41 - Storm Sever and Oi•ch Lncation Map
APPENDIX 42 - Storm Water Drainaga Basins
APPENDIX 43 - Cost Summary and Possible Funding Source Summary
a
I. SUMMARY
This report propos.•s solutions to the followinn nrnhlomc,
1. Existing storm xewurs have inadequate capacity
acrordinq to John Johnson's Sturm Water Management
Plan (Johnson Plan).
2. Low land areas (where st•)rm water collects, ponds
and infiltrat.•ti into the flrr.und) that are filled
reduce the Papa city of storm %ewers.
3. The discharge of ground warm that has been used
for heating and cooling buildings reduces the
capacity of storm sewers.
4. Ditches have inadequate capacity.
S. Wetlands fill over time.
A seven (7) year program to improve the storm sewer system
and _lean ditches is estimated to cost $2,700,000. The
estimated cost per year ranges from $48,000 in 1993 to
$1,277,00ei in 1997.
Either of two permanent funding sources can provide enough
money to implement this plan. They are a storm sewer
utility or a special property tax levy. Cities can now
operate storm sewer utilities just like water and sewer
utilities. The cities of Roseville, Shakopee and Richfield
now operate storm Sewer utilities. Cities can also levy a
special property tax for storm sewer maintenance and
improvements when the $09 Study is approved. The 509 Study
is the Comprehensive Storm Water Management Study the State
Legislature required Watershed Districts tc complete. Rire
Creek Wal.•rshed nistrirt is conducting the 599 Study. The
study must he approved by Ramsey County, Metropolitan
Council, Department of Natural Resources, Minnesota
Pollution 7ontrol Agrncy and the Water Resource dnard. The
509 Study may not he approved for a year or two.
If the City does not want to wait until the 509 Study is
approved, a storm sewer utility can he started.
In the meantime, Storm 4lator Management (SbTt) funds can be
utilized to rlean some ditches, complete detailed studies
and construct storm sewer improvements. A detailed study
of the Edgewood drainage basin should he completed to
determine the cos': effective solution to problems
identified in the Johnson Plan and e%tablish the level of
MSA funding for the 1987 project. A full-time, temporary
employee should he hired ror tour (4) months to conduct the
study. Funding for the position could come from the SWM
Fund. The employee's minimum qualifiratinns should be a
Civil F.ngineerinq Technol,,Iy Degree from a 2 year
Vocational Terhniral In9ti bite.
Strum Water and tletland Managemont Plan
Nnvemher 14, 1985
Low lend areas need to no- prnteCted from unnecessary
fillinq hecause if they are filled in, the water that
previously infiltrated into the ground will run off into a
storm sewer that does net have enouqh capacity.
Ordinance changes can prohibit filling low land areas and
prohibit discharginq Around water (used for heatinq and
r(3olinq huildings) Into storm sewers.
According to the Ramsey Soil and Water Conservation
District, n wetland ctody ran he conducted in 1991 to
determine what rhange.� (htrve oceured since the 1981 study.
If the changes are undesirable, correctiw� action can be
taken.
11. BACKGROUND, PROBLEM STATEMENT AND PURPOSE
Background
This report is written per the City Council's request
for a Storm Water and Wetland Manaqement Plan. The
report discusses a maintenance/improvement plan for
storm sewers and ditches and a preservation/maintenance
plan for wetlands. An improvement plan for wetlands is '
not addressed because a need for wetland improvement has
not been documented or Justified.
a) Storm Sewer and Ditch Maintenance
The City has maintained and cleaned storm sewers for
many years. Clean storm sewers insure that the
maximum amount of storm water is carried away from
developed areas. Storm sewer rapacity is reduced
when ditches are filled with sediment and/or not
(Irsigned properly. Many of the City'% ditches have
reduced flow because of sedimentation. This plan
will review the City's existing storm sewer
maintenance program and propose impr,,vements. This
plan does not discuss the maintenance needs of
Ramsey County road ditches or Minnesota Department
of Transportation hiqhwav ditches.
b) Storm Sewer
Improvement
Two storm water
improvement
plans have been prepared
for the City
of Mounds View.
The first plan was
completed by
Short-Ellint-Hendrickson
6 Associates,
Inc. (SEHI in
Auqust, 1976.
The second plan was
1981. The
completed by
.1ohn C. Johnson
in July,
for approximately $1.5
Johnson Plan
indicates that
- 2 -
Storm WaLor and WvtlAnd Manade-ment Plan
Novemher 14, 1985
million (nor intludinn land or e,n;.tm..nt costs), thr
existing storm sewer syo em can no improved to
handler storms with a frequency of once every 5 years
and a duration of one hour. The Pity presently uses
the Johnson Plan as a guidu for storm sewer
improvements. The City constructs the proposed
improvements at the same time as street repairs in
order to Aivo xlreet reconstruction Costs. Since
the plan was written, the City has improved the
storm sewers on F,dgPwood Drive from County Road H to
County Road H-2, County Road I from Silver Lake Road
to 'r.H. 10, and 0utn,-y street from County Road 11-2
to Ilillview Road. The cost for these storm sewer
improvements was paid for by Municipal State Aid
(MSA) because the work wns dnne on MSA do0rInatod
streets during ternn Firwrion d thee:.• mlioot% rh,.
City also contructed a storm water detention pond In
Random Park as part of the, improiements to that
tin, k.
c) Wetland Preservation/Maintenance
In December, 1981, Ramsey Soil and Water
Conservation District prepared a Wetland Inventory
for the City of Mounds View. In October, 1982, the
City's Wetland Zoning Ordinance was adopted. The
purpose of the Wetland Zoning Ordinance is to
preserve wetlands in as natural a State as possinln,
serve as natural retention and detention areas for
Surface wAtPrs, and prevent damage from excessive
sueilmentation, outrophicatto,t n Polltitl—
Wetlands fill in if left in a natural state for a
long period of time. The purpose of the wetland
plan is to maintain the wetlands in as natural a
state as possible (i.e., maintain existing
conditions).
2. Problem Statement
This report discusses Ann proposes solutions to the
following problems:
a) Existing Storm sewers have inadequate capacity
according to the Johnson Plan.
b) Low land areas (where storm wa her rollerts, ponds
and infiltrates into the ground) that are filled,
reduw- the capacity of storm sewers.
c) The discharge of ground water that has been used Fur
heating and cooling buildings reduces the capacity
of storm sewers.
- l -
1; t"rm Water and Wetland Man n-P•m.-nt PIin
November 14, 19d5
III
IV
d) I,av� u,.nh•y u.,l .• r.y t.,�•ily.
e) Wetlands till over time.
J. Pur osc
The purpose of th1- report
and Wetland Managemavit Plan
aforementioned problems.
EXISTING t•ACILITIE5
1. Storm Sewers
is to propose a storm water
that will solve the
The existing storm sever syctrm cons
approximately of
approximately 15.4 miles of concrete and corrugated
metal pipe. The storm sewers vary in size from 12"
diamot.•r to 54" diameter. The replacement cost of the
storm sewer system at $45.00 per foot is $3.6 million.
The actual replacement cost would he higher because
roads would also need to be reconstructed.
2. Ditches
A majority of tPIe storm sewers empty into ditches which
ultimately carry the water to Rice Crcek. The combinrm ed
length of the ditches that carry
outlets to the City limits is approximately 1.3 miles.
wetlands
in December of 1981, Ramsey Soil and Water Consveration
District completed a Wetland Inventory for the City of
Mounds View. This inventory indicates that there are
219.5 acres of wetlands in the City of Mounds View.
This is approximately 8 percent of the land within the
City limits (219.5 acres/2,80U acresl. Wetlands vary in
B 12N from 0.9 acr.es to 62.7 acres.
POSSIBLE. SOLUTIONS
1. Storm__. Sewer Mal^tenance
Storm sewer maintenance includes repairinq broken pip,
joints, cleaning catrh basins, excavatinn sediment at
storm sewer pipe outlets, removing large stones, boards
and branches from Sturm sewer and cleanin., storm sewer:
once every 2 or 3 years.
MM
S hrrm Waror and Wetland Managoment Plan
Novemher 14, 1985
Three are some storm sewer actions that n.�ed cleaninq
more often because more 4and is deposited in these
pipes. The followinq st"rm sewer section'; nood cloaninq
once ovary year:
a) The storm sewer that starts at 22.71 County Road 11-2
and dischantcs into Lambert Park.
h) The storm sever that starts A the intersection of
Eastwood Road and Woodcrest Drive and discharges
into Wooderest Park.
c) The storm sewer that .Trains the areas north of
Sherwood Road and west of Noudlawn Drive.
When the storm sewer improvement.; arm• completed, deten-
tion ponds and equipment will need periodic cleaning.
Some storm sewers have tree roots growing through the
pipe joints. Staff will inspect the larger pipes and
televise the smaller pipes to determine if the roots
should he sprayed as we do for sanitary sewers so that
the pipe's ability to carry storm water will be maxi-
mized. This work will bo coordinated with the Storm
Sewer Improvement Program and the Sanitary Sewer
Maintenance Program.
2. Storm Sewer Im ov.•m.•nt
a) Non -Structural Improvements
Juhn Johnson's Storm Water Management Plan will work
only if people do not increase the quantity of water
erterinq the storm sewers. There are two ways that
we can increase storm water quantity.
First, ground water can now he used to heat and cool
buildings. For heatino or coolinq, ground water is
pumped thrnunh a heat exchanger and discharged into
the ground where it flows over land until it enters
a storm sewer. Building owners normally discharge
ground water into the storm sewer because
discharging the water into a sanitary sewer is not
allowed and dtsr,harginq water back into the ground
(qround water recharge) is ton expensive. The City
should prohibit the discharge of ground water fused
for heating and cooling buildings) into the storm
sewer system because the storm ,ewer system does not
have adequate capacity.
- 5 -
Storm Water and Wetland Management Plan
N,.v.•mher 14, Ins'.
Second, The Johnson Plan will work only if the
existing low lands (land that h.1: no surface water I
discharge point) are not filled. It the low land is
filled, the wator Ohm mw ponds in the low land
will enter the storm sower and then the storm sewer
will he 1.., sn,.,ll I., ...levy Ill.. Il-.w.
There are twe reason" for banning fill in low land
ar,•as. The first reason is hpcause existing storm
vewern du unl IL we a.h •qu..1 .• eapa. fly. 'I'h.• s.....md
reason is because the seven county metropolitan area
needs to preserve ground water recharge areas.
Water in the previously mentioned low lands now
infiltrates into the soil. The Johnson Plan assumes
that the seepage rate will stay the same. Low land,
like wetlands, fill in over time and the seepage
rate will be reduced by sedimentation. In other
words, less water will percolate into the ground
which will cause the water level in the low land to
rise and either; a) flood buildings, or h) enter the
storm sewer. If this water enters the storm sewer,
the storm sewer will he too small to carry the
flow. Therefore, from time to time the qrnund
surface of low land areas will need to be excavated '
to restore the seepage rate.
The low lands may need to he excavated once very ten
(10) to fifty (50) years depending on the quantity
of fine particles carried into low land with the
storm water. Low lands need to he excavated when
storm water hacks up and threatens to flood
bah'CmPnta, or when low lands uvertlow into the storm
sewers too quickly, or when water ponds for long
p.•riods of timo-
b) Structural Improvements
The Johnson Plan includes constructing improvements
to the storm sewer sytem. In order to accomplish
this, I propose the following program for each
drainage basin.
1. Survey the drainage basin to determine site
specific data such as pipe diameter, pipe
length, pipe slope, etc. (the .lohnson Plan used
plans which may or may not have been followed
during Construction. The plans are certainly
sufficient for use in a study, but not
sufficient for design work).
- 6 -
gtorm Water and Wetland Managem.•nt Plan
November 14, 1985
2. Insert any changes into the computer model and
de•er.nine the coat eftective solution. At the
same time, secure easements from property owners
for storm water detention pnnds.
3. Advertise for bids.
4. Construct the improvements.
Construction of improvements will continue to he
coordinated with construction of MSA designated
streets. The procedure indicated above will be used
for each drainage basin. The Johnson Plan stales
thdt top priority should be given to the Edgewuod
Drive and Ardan Avenue drainage hasins.
The Johnson Plan indicates which storm sewers need
improvement because of inadequate capacity. The
study does not mention that some people think that
ditches with traffic safety prohlems need to be
replaced with st:;rm sewer. The specific ditches are
as tollow4:
West side of Long Lake Road from Scotland Court
to County Road 11-2.
2. North side of Woodcrest Drive from Red Oak Drive
to Silver Lake Road.
By replacing ditches near parks with storm sowers,
as the City has done in Greenfield Park, additional
high land becomes available for recreation.
The point is that when the storm sewer improvements
are completed and they have adequate capacity, tnere
are other reasons for installing the storm sewer.
The main thrust .)f storm sewer improvements and this
report continues to he to provide adequate capacity.
3. Ditch Maintenance
Ditch cleaning is the excavation work necessary to
removo sediment from the ditch so that water flow will
not be Impeded. In most cases, this means excavating
the ditch so that it hay: a constant xlope from an
exictinq storm rower nutlet to an existing srorin sewer
inlet.
The City's ditches are listed in Artachment I1. The
ditches ara numbered banod on their need fnr clear,inq.
A deecriptinn of each ditch is described bulowt
Storm Water and Wetland Manao,•tm•nt Plan
W -emhrr 14, 19015
�I
a) Ditch 11 flows from near the intersection of County
Rnad T and Edgvwood Drive to the intersection of
Ilillview Road and Vuinvy Strret.
b) Ditch 112 flows from approximately the intersection
of Long Lake Road and Arlan Avenue to the inter-
section of Sherwood Road and Jackson Drive.
c) Ditch 13 flows from approximately the intersection
Q Wn, �drr,"I 14 ivo a d R.•,1 oak Ih W I- P""niy MW
H and Pleasant View Drive.
d) Ditch 14 flows from approximately the intersection
of Jackson Drive• and Hillvirw Road to Ditch 11.
e) Ditch 15 flows from approximately the intersection
A Jackson Drive and Lambert Avenue to the inlet
ht_hind the house at 2255 Lambert Avenue.
f) Ditch 16 illustrates the ditch system in the area of
County Road H and Long Lake Road
q) Ditch /7 is located just northeast of the inter-
section of nroonfipld Avpnnp and Rrnnsnn Drive.
h) Ditch 18 (Judi.-iai Ditch 11) is locoted north of new
T.H. 10 and south of County Road J.
4. Wetland Preservation/Maintenance
Wetland maintenance was discussed with a representaive,
Ton Petersoniof the Ramsey Soil and Hater Conservation
District (RSWCD). Mr. Peterson wrote the 1981 Wetland
Inventory for the City of Mounds View. The discussion
used the followi.iq Iogic. Since this program is to
maintain the existing wetland: and not improve the
wetlands, and since wetlands fill in over a long period
of time, we uelieve that a study conducted once every 10
years to determine how the wetlands have changed will
help. The stuuy would he conducted in 1991 and each
wetland would be reviewed and Compared to the 1981
Study. If measurable changes occurred, then the causes
of the changes would be determined and a course of
action to prevent the changes could be implemented.
Corrective action could incude harvesting vegetation,
excavating a portion of the wetland, etc. Mr. Peterson
also stated that the RSWCD may conduct the wetland
status inventory for nc charge. The corrective action
will need to he paid for by the City, however, the one
problem with taking corrective action is that the City
does not own a good portion of the wetland areas and
approval by the property owner will be necessary.
. 8 - y
Storm Water and Management Pian
November 14, 1985
V. ESTIMATED MST!;
I, Storm Sower Maintenance
fhe City has the time, ,Iatf and equipment to conduct
the proposed storm sever maintenance program. The
additional cost for cleaning the indicated storm sewers
more frequently is less than $500. Therefore, no
.roditroral fundiaq nourr"v are needed.
2. Storm Sever Improvements
t:14TIM.4It:U TOTAL cosTl
(EXCLUDING LAND OR
YEAR nRAINACP BASIN2 EASEMENT COSTS)
1. 1987
- Edyovuod dvainago basin
S lLU,U0u.UU
2. 1988
- North Ardan drainage basin
214,000.00
3. 1989
- Ardan drainage basin
203,000.00
4. 1990
- Hfllview drainage basin
301,000.00
S. 1991
- Spring Lake drainage hanio
us, UOU. 00
6. 1992
- Spring Creek and Pinewood
141,000.0
Drive drainage basins
TOTAL CUST
$1,414,000.00
ISource:
Johnson Plan
20ther drainage
basins in the City are
not listed
because
the storm severs have adequate
capacity.
The cost of replarinq those ditches that are felt by
some to pose traffic safety problems with storm sewers
is not included in the above improvements.
3. Ditch Maintenance
There are two ditch cleaning alternatives. The first
alternative is to survey the ditch, prepare plans and
specifications, bid the work, and then clean the ditch.
The second alternative is to have staff clean the ditch
and/or hire an excavator for less than $15,000 to assist
with ditch cleaning.
al Alternative tl
In 1912, the City cleaned the ditch on the southwest
corner of Lonq Lake Road and County Road H-2. The
total cost of cleaninq this 800 foot long ditch was
approximately $25,000. if this cost is increased
- 9 -
:;rorm Nat.•r and Wetland Man.ul.•ment Plan
November 14, 1985
for inflation and contingenci.•.s, the. vast for
cleaninq ditchos i. approximately $40.00 per font.
Ile, estimated r,St for cleaninq each ditch, assuming
$40.00 per font, is .+s tollr,wS (the dit.•h numbers
refer to ditches described above and on Attachment
01):
AI t.-rnato 11
f:Stimated
Cost for Ditch
:'leaning
(Including
Ditch
Engineering,
Staking,
Len(jth
Ins ertion i Contincency)
a)
Ditch
I1
5,400
ft.
$
216,000.00
b)
Ditch
12
3,400
ft.
$
136,000.00
c)
Ditch
13
3,500
ft.
S
140,000.00
d)
Ditch
14
1,100
ft.
$
44,000.00
e)
Ditch
15
700
ft.
$
28.000.00
f)
Ditch
16
2,700
ft.
S
108,000.00
q)
Ditch
/7
1,000
ft.
$
40,000.00
h)
Ditch
18
2,400
ft.
$
96,000.00
i)
Reevaluate
ditch cleaninq
program.
TOTAL S 808,000.00
b) Alternative 12 .
This alternative involves staff utilizing the
backhoe/loader to clean as many of the ditches as
possible. The ditches that cannot be cleaned
because of egnipment limitations could be cleaned by
hiring an excavator with iperaLor. All the ditches
can be cleaned by City staff with the help of an
excavator. The City's purchasing pol.cy will be
ft, llowed. staff wil! work with the excavator to
insure, that the ditches are cleaned adequately. The
excavator (and bulldozer if needed) can clear and
grub trees and brush as necessary. Ditches 111, 2,
3, 4, 6 and 8 flow through wetland.; and are more
easily cleaned in the winter. The estimated cost
includes hiring temporary employees. The number of
temporary employees hired (2 or 3 persons) will
depend on which ditch is beinq cleaned.
The cost for this alternative is estimated to be 50t
of the cost of Alternative #I. The cost is tabu-
lated as follows:
- 10 - 9
Storm water dnd tlotland Maoagomont Plan
Nuvembt•r 14, 1985
YEAR
DITCHES To BE rLFANED
ESTIMATED COST
1981
___
Il
S 108,000.00
1988
12
S 68,000.00
1989
li
$ 70,000.00
1990
14 and 15
$ 36,000.00
1991
16
S 54,000.00
1992
17
S 2U,000.00
1993
/8
S 48,000.00
1994
Raovalualo Ditch rloauing
Pn.iram
TOTAL
_
� 4G1,OU0.�0
4. wetland Preservation/Maintenance
The worland invouliny •:lu,ly MAY I$- r-aulurlyd by Ramsey
County at no cost to the city. At this time, one cannot
determine the cost of maintaining wetlands because one
does not know what rorrortive action is needed or how
fl-oguonl ly lh-- walk no.-.1': 1,� hr. ,L nn•.
5. Cost Summary
The following is a cost summary from Appendix 13 for
storm sewer improvements (tncluning land and easement
ccst) and ditch maintenance (Alternate 12).
Fland
STIMATED ESTIMATEU esTIMATKU ESTIMATED
COSTI COST COST 'TOTAL COST
rm Sewer Storm sower Ditch main- Storm sewer
rovement, impn,vement tenance (Alt- improvements
ludtnq lan•1 ara erg
12) (including
or ease- easomont est. lard anc
costs c„ste f
ment
s) and
h main-
YEARnce
1987320,000 $ 849,000 S 108,00,277,000
1988 214,000 0 ' 68,00282,000
1989 203,000 25,000 70,000580,000
1990 30t,000 0 36,000337,000
1991 235,000 0 54,000289,000
1992 141,000 0 20,O00161,000
----------- —-----1993 0 0 4tl,000Itl,000
ESTIMATED S 1,404,0010 S 874,000 $ 404,O00692,000
TOTAL. COST
ISou rro: ,lohnson Plan
Storm Water and Wetland MaNlgement Plan
Novemher 14, 1989
ri
V1. FUNDINa
1. Storm Sewer Maintenance
Funding for this program now cnmvr. from the General
Foud and is
2, gf„_rm Sewer Imnrr,v.•men_ ts�an`i flitch Maintenance
Possible funding RnUrC'... for ^ower improve-
ment and ditch maintenance include the f(:llowing:
a) Storm Water Iianageme�t
The Storm Water Manaqement Fund was created to
account for storm warm management charges
collected when land is developed. Monies so
obtained may be used for the development of
storm 1985, drainage
hadfacilities. cember 31,
acash balance of
$277,847.00.
b) Municipal State Aid
A portion of the CIWy MSA constru. '
ment may be used for storm sewer maintenance
and/or construction in conjunctionwith Tan is a
approved street construction Pro]nCt.only storm
very limited source of funding.
sewer or drainage improvements along MSA streets
are eligible.
c) Fefe_ re�dw^
The City could levy
beyond
current levy
and seek
authority to levy
limits.
d) Bonds
The City could issue bonds to finance projects
and special levy to pay for the bonds. This
would be in conjunction with special assessments
to benefited properties. The City would have to
levy at least 20 percent of the project's total
cost.
e) stormsewer
Minnesota State Statute 444.075 lives cities the
authority to start and operate a storm sewer
utility. The cities of Rnspville_, Shakopee and
Richfield currently operate storm sower
utilities.
- 12 -
Storm Slat..r an,! Wetla.n.• Man 1--r,.nt Plan
November 14, IaH5
The (ity of RosoviIlo has oporated a storm suw-Ir
utility for 2 veara. The utility operates
exactly like tho water and sewer utiIitie,..
Storm sewer utility hillinas occur at the same
time as the water and sewer billings. In
Roseville, the storm sewer hill for a single
famiiy home is $4.35 per quarter.
If a storm sewer utility were crusted in Mounds
View, the property owner would pay directly for
their share of the community's drainage
expenses instead of paying for these costs
through their property taxes. Thus, storm sewer
utility would reduce property taxes and increase
utility costs.
If a storm sewer utility wens created, storm
sewer maintenance (now funded by the General
Fund) would he paid by the utility. In other
words, the storm sewer utility would free General
Fund money for other uses.
f) Special Property Tax Levy
Minnesota Statutes authorize a special property
tax levy, beyond levies which are subject to levy
limitation laws, for watershed management
purposes, including planning, improvements and
maintenance.
The City cannot levy this tax until:
1. Rice Cr_ek Watershed District's (RCWD) 509
Study is apnrnved h; Ramsey County,
Metropolitan Council, Department of Natural
Resourres, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
and the Water Resource Board.
2. The City has, according to State Statute
473.879,prepared a "Local Water Management
Plan".
3. The local plan has been resubmitted and
approved by RCWD.
q) Housing and Urban Development (HUD)
storm sewer improvements are -1igihle to receive
funding from IIDD'1i Community Development Block
Grant Pnniram. Protect, receive grants based on
documented need, type of project, benefited
property owners inrnmP level and tither criteria.
Cities that have resident~ with low inctimo,
Storm water and Wi-ila,l,l nnii.nj.vuirit "tan
November 14, 1985
usually rv-vive these grants. Housinq
impr.ivemvnl proivcts usually ....... ive lunding
before storm sever improvement projects. Thus,
the cnance of recviving funding for this type of
project Is low.
h) Rice Creek Watershed District
Ric.• Creek Wal.rnhvd District (RCWD) van provide
funds Ion ditch . I.•onrng. 'I'll. i, luudiml j•:
limited because of a tight hurblot. In 1986,
they budgeted approximately $160,000 for ditch
m.;i nfrn,,nrRCWD maV lo-vid" fundiml up to 50R
of the cost of the Prulecr.
I) Ramsey County
Storm water from Ramsey County road right-of-way
flows through our storm sewer system.
Therefore, a reasonable person can say that some
of the cost for ditch maintenance and storm
sewer improvement should he paid by Ramsey
County. However, funding from this source is
limited.
VI1. DISCUSSION ,
Estimated costs for storm sewer improvements and ditch
maintenance range from $48,000 in 1993 to $1,277,000 in
1987. Seventy percent (S849,000) of the 1987 estimated
costs are for land or easement purchase, in tha Edgewood
drainage basin. Storm sewers in this drainage basin should
he improved first according to the Johnsrn Plan. Detailed
studies should be completed to determine the cost effective
solution prior to purchasing land. Detailed studies could
be completed in 1986.
Possible funding sources for the 1987 project include Storm
!later Management Fund (sWM), Municipal .State Aid (MSA),
Storm Sewer Utility (SSU), Rice Creek Watershed District
(RCWD), Ramsey County, referendum, bonds, and special
property tax levy.
There is not enough money in the SWM Fund for either the
1987 project or this plan.
MSA will only fund a small portion of the 1987 project and
this plan. MSA will determine their funding after the
detailed studies are completed-
- 14 - 10
Storm hater and Wetiann Mana,lement Plan
Nov,-mh.•r 14, 1485
A rr h,n•ndum for st,,rm •wwur improvument,4 nod ditch
ma intonanr,• is unIikoly to pans glue to past history on this
issue and the City's lack of success with other recent bond
proposal9.
Issuinq bonds does not Rees feasible herauno ARso-RAing
benefiting property owners for storm sewer improvements may
not be acceptable.
RCWD and Ramcry County have hudget limitari"n.; and can "illy
fund a .mall portion of the 1987 project and this plan.
If the City does not want to wait until the 509 Study is
completed, the City could start an SSU. The SSU could fund
a major portion of the 1987 project and the rest of this
plan.
If the 509 Study is approved in 1986, the City could impose
a special property tax levy t,, fund the 1987 project and
the rest of the plan. If the 509 Study is not approved in
1986, the 1987 project and this plan could be delayed until
the 509 Study is approved.
Until the SSU is started or the 509 Study is approved, the
City could conduct a detailed study and determine the cost
eftrctive solution for the F.dgewood drainage basin. In
order to conduct a detailed study, the City needs to hire a
full-time, temporary employee for four months. The City
could utilize the interest from the SWM Fund to pay for the
position. Once the detailed sttidy is crrrnplotod, MSA w�ll
be able to determine their tundinq for the 1487 project.
SWM funds could he utilized to clean ditches, televise
storm sewers with possible root problems and construct
storm sewer improvements until a permanent fundinq source
is located.
Vill CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
1. The two most feasible sources of permanent. funding for
storm sewer improvements and ditch cleaning are a storm
sewer utility and special property tax levies under 509
authorization.
2. 1 recommend using the snecial property tax levy as the
permanent source of tonding to implement this plan
because our p!an will Mr coorr.inated with the Regional
Watershed Plan (509 Study) and thorn will by fewer
citizen complaints about coat.
St•rua 6'ater aml wrtlanA Man.vp•ment Vlan
November 11, 1985
le 3. ArdetAiledatithorizstudy dr•lelrminagtheur''vfai•ffeotivetsolurrtion
ondtirt
and the MSA fundinq contribution for' the Months to project.
A pernn❑ shnuld hr hired for fYitroninhouldromerfrom
the st•rdy. Fun, ino for the posit.
the SWM Fund.
Fund
C. inter Yeartfornaturmms w.•rSW�prnvemi'll" land `dltccheCed
cleaning until a permanent funding source is located.
5, Nontnn•tur.fl sl inn :over imprnaem••nrs sorb
prohibiting fillu,.l of Jusr9ttaroundrwaterf(used ffor
prohibiting the discharge of g
or into [he stir^naev"rsdsl9u Id heoimplemented byrfacr
ordinance change.
6. A wetland study should be conducted in 1991 to
determine if '.nanrn•y havo ncrurrd in IIII,,cron ca* If
ds
the chanrles are undesirable, curn•etivr arrion can be
taken.
a
- 16 -
LA00R
I Y'`EGG
t
PAM;:• COON A. MINN(SOIA L Ft�
F T-- I sll
WoTlpSttc. I I ' 1 •
STORM SEM'E!
DITCH
"PLNDIX 41
STORM SLIILK Di it AND LOCATION MAY
97
Aokurw AAe14W
�^N r
I�L.1
,
lift, w I
F.`. �-
. ,�, tlIYYI�IItI�,I► i I t trr
97i ' .'lIJ1 ♦1 Y! it '�
I
CItY OF ;; •� ',
MAMUT LOUNIT MINII*WIA
. ✓ JT17kM WNIIl1 =
TREET DRNINII I YFF�)IlVb
" II
I AJORES8-.Irrl• :; I •.. J
YAW AU♦'IU N.IU _ N.I...I• �I. 11
'ov, I :Oi-
S•yre Samoa- swore %doer
).404-'1 ImvraVlt,•t
e.r A-,g It-d an!
lend Or e01•- safe.•••
.•^• :os•f :".0
1AA
19V S 510. O00 f .. 64?.000
I"6 214.000 _•—M0
1969 295."0 211.000
301.r,
I"? 233. COP. 0
1992 161,000 0
1995 0 .—. _ 0
1,¢'00000 is 974.000
wA_ - •VA..
_. 10. o00
_ 560.000
54.000
2?y.OW)
20,000
'S I,000
—. N.000 f
46,000
406.000 If 2.642,000
foot Rot":
'Source: Johnson 24A.
2%M iunat'q will 31064bly na• be 4•.1118000 because only A Natl
portion Of on MSA desl2ndt4C it'eat .6 " ••s wallop eats.
SOItCh/Craak Only bonafita Oraperty In •10 :Ity Of MOMnds nb.
•neneNNo. fend„9 oral Q AM is ❑n11N 1.
AA very /It" pencantage of "lifflfin9 and 's pNasY COu^-y ' �•'•
Ot-I11y and the wanay spent 'a o0•01n •.• p'a" -tv •.'N' •^e
Mount.
•dM
M y•: •LIB
ar:EA
S�VA;E
S'Arf •
• y
.1_EMEV'
.........
SI
......
R
....
A
R
[
x
x
x
A
f
R
A
Inc-,
x
R
.1p2
A
A 1 W2 { x
N51-91E FM NG S"CEi
M 90V0f S•JAMlz�mu
.RLEVY
l
x
R
A
x
x
V06
x
x
V06
x
x
V06
x
x
V; -
.x
x
W3
R0S
W3
A
x
SLend C"-/ assr.e $1.00 par sawre roar far wstlends:
slobs oar sa,ere 'x• tar •et I ands $29 000 I
12.54 w sauwe I", for O.,er land II'M ta. fr,l
600n a v'.Act cost iA Isu •aan IS00, 000, no cost of So lnp ponds
Is •i9, 'staffon •a "If bond proceeds recelv".
t',a Star. Oryl,pe rs•pwsn• fund Is a possible tue611q pyres for
w. 0
APPR
PROCEEDINGS OF 1'11C CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA
Regular Meeting
February 24, 19t;6
Mounds View City Hall
2401 Hwy. 10, Mounds View, MN 55112
-- -------------------------------
The Mounds View City Council was called to order by
Mayor Linke at 7:00 PM on February 24, i986.
The Pledge of Allegiance was said.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Councilmembers Quick, Haake, Ilankner,
Blanchard and Mayor Linke.
ALSO PRESENT: Clerk/Administrator Pauley and Public
Works/Community Development Director Thatcher.
Motion/Second: Blanchard/Quick to approve the February
10, 1986 minutes as presented.
5 ayes 0 nays
Frank Blaziak, 5479 Adams Street, asked the Coincil's
help in controlling the parking problem in has
neighborhood. He stated they have had problems with
the apartment residents and their guests parking
along the street and in front of the hones in the
area, and the past weekend someone had parked their
vehicle in hit driveway while visiting at the apartment
building. He stated he had called the police and they
called a tow truck but the owner did return for his
vehicle before it was towed. He added in his case
it could present very serious problems as they have a
chronically ill child who has had to ua ruzh..' w U,c
hospital and his car that night was blocked in the
garage by this vehicle.
Mayor Linke stated he had rec^.ived Mr. Blaziak's letter
and had discussed it with the Clerk/Administrator,
Public Works/Community Development Director and
Police Chief, and there are no parking siqns posted,
and they have met in the past with the apartment owners,
who are not willinq to make any impro%—ments to their
parking area, as it would involve a cost to them.
1. Call to Order
2. Pledge of
Al legiancra
3. Roll Call
4. Approval of
Minutes:
February 10,
1986
Motion Carried
5. Residents
Requests and
Comments 'rom
the Floor
Mounds 6icw City Council rrbruary 24, .0 5
neyu.a+ Paqe Two
---- ---
Clerk/Administrator Pauley added that the City had
advised the owners that they would allow them to
build a parking area on the boulevard, but the owners
do not want to spend the money. He added they cannot
prevent someone from parking in someone else's
driveway, and recommended the police be called, who
could then call a tow truck and ticket the offender.
Mayor Linke stated Director Thatcher would be writing
a letter to the apartment owners, advisinq them of
the problem.
Councilmember Hankncr asked Mr. Blaziak's permission
to include a copy of his letter, with his name and
address removed. Mr. Blaziak consented.
Aayor Linke closed the regular meeting and opened
6. public Hearing:
the public hearing on the spring Lake Park Knolls
Spring Lam
park Knolls
Addition.
Addition
Director Thatcher explained that Leonard Kremer is
proposing to subdivide two lots into six zero lot
line lots.
Mr. Kremer reviewed the proposed development,
stating the hardship involved would be an economic
'
one, as they have had this property for several
years and the taxer continue to increase more than
they Lan raise the re,its.
Director Thatcher stated the Planning Commission
has reviewed this and granted a variance on the
northeast lot, since the County took a large amount
of land from tyat piece of property to widen
County Road I. He added a few minor details are
still required from Mr. Kremer before final
approval could be granted.
Mr. Kremer reviewed the plans they have for ponding
the site.
Director Thatcher stated the existing storm water
retention pond does have meet existing city codes
as it does not provide a positive outlet, and the
new pond would be built to code.
Bruce Wolfe, 7685 Groveland Road, stated his property
&butts this proposed development and they have had
problems with ponding in the past and they have often
had standing water 3' deep on the property. He stated
the land is too low to allow for any farther development.
February 24, 1986
Mnunds View City Council page Three
Regular Meeting ------------------
--------------------- ---
Mr. Wolfe presented a petition, with 22 signatures on it
A residents who arc against adding the proposed
additional double bungelow due to the water problems.
He added they have also experienced parking problems
in the area from the double bungelows.
Director Thatcher explained that if the existing hold-
ing pond is redesigned, it should eliminate the water
problem they presently have.
Mr. Kremer wed
constructedtand ewhere �t` hewatdrainage rwouldSflowmwould andwoAdd
pond.
Spiczka,Jeanette
zero lot linewas and and Ro
at
ad, asked
ity has anyhothors.
Mayor Linke explained what a zero lot line is. Director
Thatcher named some other locations in the City that
have a zero lot line.
Mrs. Spiczka asked if the Planning Commission was
required to notify the residents of the area that they
were discussing the request.
Director Thatcher replied the Planning Commission was
not required to do so, but the Council is and they
have done so.
Craig zuidema, 2809 County Road I, stated he feels
there is such a problem hey
ld
build another structurealready hat t
thereandnotadd touthenct
problem.
Mayor Linke st.at:d that the plans show the developer
would slope the drain -off duw:' and it should not
effect any of the residents.
Mrs. Spiczka stated the City was concerned about
a water problem there 10 years ago when they built
their home.
Mrs. Wolfe stated there is already enough of a
problem there, and another duplex would only add
to it. She stated she was also concerned with
placing another structure there, as it would
crowd the neighborhood.
Director Thatcher explained that the development
agreement would assure that the developer would
not create a problem. He added that it is to the
developer's benefit to do it right the first tiw—
a
Mounds View City Council February 24, i9E6
Req.1a,: Mmi Lang Page Four
--- "----------------------------.._--__--_-----------_----------------------
Councilmember Haake stated it was not the Planning
Commission's intent to have a cluster of duplexes in
that area. She added she has observed problems there 10
with water and parking and so forth, and added that
she does net fee, an economic hardship is sufficient.
Councilmember Blanchard stated she was also concerned
with the water problem.
Councilmember Quick questioned why zero lot lines were
nut used with the original two duplexes.
Mr. Kremer responded that the City did not Lave zero
lot lines at that time, but they were built to meet
those requirements, with individual services and so
forth.
Councilmember Quick asked if the proposed changes would
enhance the drainage on the lots.
Director Thatcher replied it would as it would provide
a larger detention pond.
Councilmember Hankn,rr stated she was concerned with the
parking issue and felt the Council should look into it
further. ,
Mr. Wolfe presented a letter from one of the property
owners, who could not be present. Clerk/Administrator
Pauley read the letter, from Terry Martinson, i653
Groveland Road, who stated he was against the development.
Mrs. Neagbour, 7660 Gro�elano Road, stated there is a
problem already with cars parking along the road, and
her family had built in Mounds View 19 years ago because
they liked the large lots and openess, and they do not
want to see it go any smaller.
Mayor Linke stated he was not concerned with the pro-
posed drainage plan but he did have d problem with
using economics as justification for allowing this.
He also pointed out that parking is a problem.
Cuuuciimesuber Hauknur suggested continuing the discussion
to the next agenda session, where they could look at
some solutions tc the problems that have been brought up.
Mr. Zuidema stated he feels putting in a duplex there
encroaches on the R-1 area.
Mr. Wolfe stated he feels the Council was more than
fair in allowing the Kremer's to put up the first two
duplexes. He added there has been a controversy all 10
along and he does not feel any more concessions should
be given.
Mounds View City Council February 24, 198t,
Regular Meeting -Page Five
-------------------------- --- ----
Mr. Kremer stated he does not feel the City gave them
ny concessions, and they are not asking based on an
economic hardship alone, but because it makes sense.
He added it is a prover. fact that multiple family
dwellings get fewer services than single family. Ile
also stated he would be willing to work with the City
on the parking problem.
Mayor Linke closed the Dublrc huarina and reopened
the regular meeting at B:05 PM. He added they will
continue the discussion at the next agenda session,
or March 3.
Councilmember Hankner asked ClerkiAdministrator
Pauley to provide the Council with the information
from the parking study that was done approximately
a year ago, at the agenda session..
Motion/Second: Quick/Hankner to approve the 7. Approval (.f
consent agenda, as presented, and waive the reading Consent Acenda
of the resolutions.
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Calriad
Councilmember Hankner asked Clerk/Administrator
,auley for information, regarding the salary
increases for non -union employees, including a
copy or the previous information from the Stanton
survey.
Clerk/Adminrstrutur Pauley replied he would du d
comparative analysis for 1985.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reviewed the purpose of
B. 2nd Reading and
proposed "Ordinance No. 405.
OoNo. of
rd. Nu. 405
rd.
Mocion/Second: Hankner/Quick to
have
the secon6
reading and Adoption of ordinance
No.
405, an
ordinance renewing ordinance No.
390,
prohibiting
development of certain properties
on
an interim
basis, and waive the reading.
Councilmember Quick -
aye
Councilmember Haake -
aye
Councilmember Hankner
- Syr
Councilmember Blanchard
-
aye
Motion Carried
Mayor Linke - aye
February 24, 1986
Mounds View city �ourcli Page Six
Regular Meeting -------
---------------------
-----------------------------------
Ruidi
Director Thatcher reviewed Proposed ordinance No. 403. 1' oftOrdina�
Motion/Second: Hankner/Blanchard to i,ave the first
No. 403
reading of ordinance No. 403, amending the municipal
code r,f Mounds View by amending Clwpter 40 entitled
"2ouing", and waive the reading.
5 ayes 0 nays
Director Thatcher reviewed proposed ordinance No. 406.
He recommended a public hearing he held, either before
or aft •r tic first rradino.
Councilmember Blanchard stated she would like to table
the first reading until after the public hearing, as
long as there is no yrcat rush fur this rezoning.
Motion/Second: Blanchard/Quick to table the first
reading of ordinance No. 406 until after the public
hearing, and set the public hearing for March 24, 1986
at 7:05 PM.
5 ayes 0 nays
Director Thatcher updated the Council on the status
of Well 41. He explained they have pulled the well
pump and motor and they definitely need a new pump,
and they could repair the motor at a cost of $2,500,
or purchase a new, more energy efficient motor for
c4,500. He stated he will have additional information
for the Council at their n_xt agenda session.
Clerk/Administrate- Pauley added there are adeguace
funds in the Maintenance and capital lmnrovement
Account for the Sewer and Water Department.
Mayor Linke reported that Attorney Kerney was
detained out of town.
Couucilmember Quick reported he had attended a
joint Park and Rec Commission meeting on February
13, at Brightwood Hills, which 'Included Mounds View,
New arighton, Shoreview, Arden Hills and Maplewood.
He stated he felt the meeting was successful and
they were all brought up to date on the new county
park at Long Lake. He added their main concern
seemed to be funding of the maintenance.
Councilmember Haake reported she had attended the
Festivitiee Commission meeting earinerain the
citizens
evening, and Tony Jambor is propos
dance, which the City would be involved in. She
Motion Carried
10. 1st Readirg A
Ordinance No.
406
Motion Carried
11. Report of
�
Public Wo
Community
Development
Director
12. Report of
Attorney
13. Reports of
Cnuncilmen:bers
•
Mounds View City Council February 24, 1986
Regular Meeting Page Seven
-------------------------------------------------------------
added further details would he forthcoming.
Councilmember Hankner asked how much revenue
was generated from the 26 illegal parking
notices chat were issued in January. Clerk -
Administrator Pauley replied the revenue is
$10 per ticket, with the collection rate being
approximately 671.
Councilmember Blanchard reported she hat;
attended the Planning Commission agenda
session last week and chat the rnmmission
was dealing with many interesting and contro-
versial issues which would be forwarded to
the City Council when discussions were
completed.
Mayor Linke reported he would he meeting with
the mayors of Shoreview and New Brighton
later in the evening to discuss how the cities
can become more involved and assist the school
district in long range planning.
Clerk -Administrator Pauley reported the
Council had authorized staff to prepare a
request fcr proposal for insurance for next
year, and he asked +.f the Council would like
to review the RFP's before they go out. He
added that once they are rroceived, he will be
reviewing them with Councilmember Haake and
Finance Director Brager, beforo they make a
recommendation to the Cnun,"I .
Motion/Second: Haake/Linke to adjourn the
meeting at 8:38 PM.
5 ayes 0 nays
14. Report of
Clerk-
Adminis-
trator
15. Adjourn-
ment
Respectfully submitted,
Donald 1'. Pauley
Clerk -Administrator
Motion
Carried
jWt � ���GGop �.'7n. c�lx, f ` Agee
(;.Lc,tt,t�s.tc-cs,c-• � f /la �. /.� :G
1471AU- ZEw
..Cuec.l.C< d'ot�eluCcl�a./ : Y�_e�.e/'/�c-
�l6 rye G•-71-eeLe, s^. i-el" k'�t.✓is�l t'1 y�ri,te,.e� ,sae • ���i'
\. CC!x w d G"a'Z ,Ida4x- `l
1
9
NE 'Pil6 UhDSkST.dNEG ARE CrKSEL r( n..Y EZLNING
LR CONLiMUCITLN (,F A:•Y UND AT, '7680/12 AnL '090/9,d
SILVER :.AKE ROAD.
NAPE
r
At L
��-V4%L I� 1\�f�y�it`
1J
A�DRE6S
I
74 5/�
rtr .J c� • rc: (a�� (1�
%-r4' 4 a
"t
7SG e s►., / i ,.r k��
To: City of riounds View I'lannrnq Commission 5 March 1996
City of !bunds View City Council ✓
It is my undersyanding that a two (2) unit or single family dwelling
is being addressed to our city planning connission aad council and
location to be on the south side County Road ' between Groveland and
Silver Lake Road.
I want to ClearlyEx�ress my Disapproval of Ainj additional units, or
dwellings 7--any size or kind in this arra for the fullrnvings reasons:
1. 1 have a Water Shed Area or Wet Land Area behind my residence now
which cause water to enter the rear of my property due to the drainage
now existing.
2. The two existing two (2) unit dwellings on the southwest corner of
Silver Lake Road and County Road I took away some of the natural
holding pond area when they were built due to its axisting low area.
3 With the above beinq true, any additional dwellings of any kind will
again cause futher flooding to the rear of my property and that of
my neighbors.
4. I also question the legal right of the nwner of the 2 unit dwellings
on the cornerin providing the very poor fence around the holding pond
that always exists.
5. Any further dwelling construction in the mentioned area will take
away more of this holding pond area and cause drianage across the
neighbors property causing additional problems will certainly be
addressed to tr,e commission.
6. The hounds View Area is high]) regarded for housing that has larger
lots, mature trees and a comfort life style.
The idea of splitting Icts or acreage into si-;all ,arcels will only
cause the city to take on the trash look of cramped housing which I
moved to Mounds View to get away from.
I Stron 1 Ur this'proposed housing addition be Denied
iJohn G. Winiecki
7575 Groveland Road N.E.
Mpls, Mn. 55432
1
Nark Schultz
7691 Groveland Road
Mounds View
Mounds View City Council,
As I am unable to attend the meeting requarding the rezoning of
the duplexes on the corner of County Road I and Silver Lake Road
I would like to exprNss my objections in this letter.
11 The addition of a rental unit usually brings with it large
numbers of cars aS evidenced by the two present duplexes. In this
case most probably cars will get parked on County Rnad I. This
road is heavily traveled and these cars would present a hazard to
motorists and to pedestrians trying to walk to the park. As there
i, no Sidewd Ix, pedestridnti wuul,I ham to w.ilk No nut in fhe
road to get around the cars.
?)The area is essentially made up of single family dwellings on
large lots. It appears that, the land was zoned for two duplexes
becadlie that is what best fit on that land. The squeezing of ,
another duplex on that land would diminish the appearance of the
area.
3)The lot has an uniighity water drainage probl m which was not
handled adequately at the tim^ of construction. No assurance can
be made that these probloms will not continue.
Why should the neighborhood residents risk ttese problems when
the only gain is the improved finanical condition of an absentee
landlord?
Sincerely,
Mark Schultz