The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAgenda Packets - 1980/02/28City of Mounds View Parks and Recreation Commission Thursday, February 28, 1980 6:30 p.m. Mounds View City Hall Council Chambers 2401 Highway 10 Mounds View, MN 55112 A G E N D A Cali to Omer Roll Call Approval of the January 25, 1980 minutes Chairman's Report Councilmember's Report % Visitcr Presentation Official swearing in process - City Administrator Nelson Comprehensive Parks and Open Space Plan update Gary Tushie, Planning Consultant - Saunders and Thalden Inc. �#: PR;1.;! ary Surve-y tabulation DILL _..ar Anderson Maintenance standards After Schoul Programs Winter Skating Program evaluation staff Report Adjournment * Denotes items that will need official Commission action DEPAHTMf NT OF PARK.^.. AFCRFATION AND FORESTRY February 27, 1980 Cif4 of vourdgview RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA 2401 HIGHWAY 10 MOGNDS VIEW, MINN 55112 H6.30b5 Dear Parks and Recreation Commissioners: Enclosed is your packet of information for the February 28, 1980 regularly scheduled meeting. The meeting -+' be called to order at 6.30 p.m. in the City Hall Council Chambers. The major issues we will be addressing are the Silver View Park Update and our progress to date on the comprehensive parks and open space study. Mr. Gary Tushie, Planning Associate, from Saunders and Thalden will be on hand to personally update the Commission as to the direction and progress we have made to date. I would also like to take the opportunity to welcome our new Commissioners, Donna Bowman qn,d M-prilynne Dennehy and Wayne ^isi apt ut@tl by is "y Council As a final note Mr. Jeffery Nelson, City Administrator will be attending our meeting to officially swear in the Commissioners for 1980. If you have any questions concerning the enclosed packet or would like to add additional agenda it", feel free to give me a call directly at 784-3055, �Bruce K. Anderson, Di Parks, Recreation 6 F BKA/sw Enclosure I� MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA Regular Session January 25, 1980 Mounds View City hall Council Chambers, 6.30 p.m. Call to Order The Mounds View Parks and Recreation Commission was called to order at 6:30 p.m. by Chairman Wayne Burmeister. Rcil Call Commissioners present - Chairman Burmeister, Commissioners Silvis, Scott, Linke, Fedor, and Weflen. Commissioners absent - Commissioners Coplin, Kuiuvar, and Haake. Councilmember present - Councilmember Ziebarth. Staff present - Director Anderson and Program Supervisor Kvalheim. Election of Commissioner Linke made a motion to reappoint Wayne Burmeister Offices as Chairperson. Commissioner Scott seconded the motion. Motion passed. 7 ayes 0 nays Chairperson Burmeister made a motion to reappoint Gordon Fedor as Vice -Chairperson. Commissioner Linke seconded the motion. Motion passed. 7 ayes 0 nays Commissioner Scott made a motion to appoint Commissioner Frank Silvis as Secretary. Commissioner Weflen seconded the motion. Motion passed, 7 ayes 0 nays Silver View Park Status Director Anderson reviewed the latest proposal update plan correspondence as received from Kraus/Anderson Inc. in regards to development and acquisition of Silver View Park. It was announced that the Silver View Park plan will be presented to the Planning Commission Wednesday, February 6. Also, the City Council will meet with Kraus/Anderson Inc. Monday, February 11 for preliminary approval of the park proposal as presented. Film Viewing "Adventure Playgrounds", a film developed in England depicting the adventure playground philosophy and program format was shown to the Commission. Discussion followed regarding the feasibility of such a program in Mounds View. 33 January 25, 1980 Parks 8 Recreation Commission Minutes Page 2 Planning Update: Director Anderson reviewed the survey as presented to the Park Comprehensive Commission. Commissioner Linke made a motion to approve the Plan survey and suggested that the survey be mailed as soon as possible. Commissioner Silvis seconded the motion. Motion passed. 7 ayes 0 nays Director Anderson asked for direction from the Commission as to the amount of involvement they wished to have regarding the survey. Commissioner Linke requested that Gary Tushie be present at future Park and Recreation Commission meetings to provide project updates and information to Commissioners as requested. Also, the Commission wishes to be informed and give final approval on each step of the Parks and Open Space Study. Winter Program Program Supervisor Kvalheimt reviewed Winter Program activities. Update Park Maintenance Director Anderson suggested that park maintenance activities Overview be reviewed and discussed on a regular basis at Commission meetings. Staff Report Director Anderson reported that Pat Casci, Parks, Recreation and Forestry Department Secretary has resigned. The secretarial position is open for applications until Monday, January 28. Adjournment Commissioner Silvis made a motion to Ad,jottrn thn m—ting. The —ion was seconded by Coms' . ;'11tr .:'cOng was .ajourned at 8:40 p.m. W Ill f'.�lil1'I NT ••I I'f.II, •-, Iif I-I.1 II I,'" ANI I I :•111 '.1 Ii I cif Of our S iew RAMS1 . CCIUNI Y, MiN laF tinTA !A fll IIII II,WAY 111 MOUNDS VIEW. MINN jhll;? AF1'ER-SCllool. ACTIVITY PROCRAM REPORT February ?8, 1480 Mounds View Parks, Recreation b Forestry Deportment .Staff felt that a need for an after -school activities program for elementary age children may be existing. Therefore, a short survey was established and distributed to the elementary schools including Pinewood, Rt•d flak, Sunnyside and Compassion Christian schools. The survey was randomly di�;tributed to five students per class and two classes per grades first through sixth. The survey was accom- panied by a self addressed stamped envelope, of the approximately two hundred surveys distributed, eighty-three were returned, thus providing for a very adequate tool for program data composition. Please refer to the survey data sheet for fluff—r reference. Considering the feedback information of the returned surveys, it was determined that an after -school program was definitely a need and an interest. Furthermore, it was determined that a fun and recreational program was re- quested rather than a competitive team program. The program content of the After -School Activities Program was specifically designed with the input re- ceived by the survey in mind. It is the goal of the After -School Activities to provide a well-rounded program of recreational activity opportunities for elementary age school children during the after -school hours. Tile month of March was chosen because it seems to be a interim month between Winter and Spring activities in which the weather is unpredictable and basically blah. Also, it is during this month that tra- ditionally both school and Recreation Departments fail to program activites. Therefore, in an attempt to combat this blast mood, the program shall attempt to perk the recreational interests of students and provide lots of activities for lots of fun! MEMO TO: Mounds View Parks and Recreation P4nissioners FROM: Bruce K. Anderson, Direr �args� Recreation and Forestry Department, DATE: February 27, 1980 RE: Parks and Open Space Update As you are aware, The City of Mounds View ha+ ontered into a planning contract with the firm of Saunders and Thalden, Inc. to develop a Comprehensive Parks and Open Space Study. Staff has presently been meeting with Mr. Gary Tushie, Planning Associate for Saunders and Thalden, on a weekly basis to review the firm's progress to date and to provide input and direction on future phases. The initial timeline for the project and our progress to date is as follows: 1. Begin inventory of existing recreational facilities - November 15, 1979 - Completed in full. 2. Begin analysis of ten neighborhood parks - November 15, 1979 - Completed in full. 3. Begin update and summary of 1970 Brauer Park Inventory Report - November 19, 1979 - Completed in full. 4. Complete inventory of existing recreational facilities - December 20, 1979 - Completed in full. 5. Begin development of a community survey - December 21, 1979 - Completed in full. 6. Complete analysis of ten neighborhood parks - December- 31 1979 - In full. 7. Begin development of park master plans - January 1, 1980 - This process is underway. 8. Complete preparation of community survey and make available for dis- tribution - January 1, 1980 - Completed in full. 9. Receive and collate results for survey - January 20, 1980 - Surveys were delivered February 16, 1980 and we are in the process of tabulating them. 10. Meeting with the Park Commission to present status of project - January 20, I980 - Completed January 24, 1980. 11. Begin cost estimates for each neighborhood park - February 12, 1980 - Not completed. 12. Complete development of park master plans - February 17, 1980 - Not completed. 13. Complete cost estimates of each neighborhood park - February 19, 1980 - Nct completed. A E Page 2 February 27, 1980 14. Meeting with Park Commission to discuss progress of project - Master Plans - February 28, 1980 - This meeting is scheduled. r 15. Submit 35 copies of final comprehensive plan update to Park Commission - March 13, 1980 - Not started yvt. In general, we are staying relatively close to our predetermined schedule. The major stumbling block we have experienced is the lack of contour maps showing the City's existing facilities. The City Council approved the Mark Hurd Aerial Survey Contract on Monday, February 11, 1980, which will enable us to continue as outlined; only I would project that we will be running approximately one month behind our initial schedule. Staff is now immersed in the survey process, which was commenced February 16, 1980. The process staff has adhered to Is as follows: 1. February 16, 1980 - Door to door distribution of park surveys to area residents. 2. February 19, 20, and 21 - Door to door collection of surveys by area residents. 3. March 1, 1980 - Deadline for all surveys to be returned. 4. March 4-110 - Tabulation and final analysis of survey by Saunders and Thalden Associates, Inc. Mr. Gary Tushie, Associate, Saunders and Thalden will be on hand at the February 2R, 1R#q r,.-ring to bring the Commission up to fin tl r;q{ls of our progress Co date. . have enclosed copies of th, -survey anu tor your personal records. In addition staff will provide the Commission with a brief update as to survey results we have tabulated to date. i ;tip �11�.�i�i....-..._ iit I`,.... h•wta i,� � �i �I � �I y�.u••�IP �i ' I � I I CITY OF ,� i•,„� to - RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA CITY MAP ��'}' �` . `• ¢, cit4 0fvoundgvigw RAMSEV COUNTY, MINNESOTA MTEWAY TO THE NORTH 2401 .11c HWAY 10 MOUNDS VIEW, MINN. 55112 18�3055 RECREATION AND FORESTRY MEMO TO: Mounds View Parks and Recreation Commissioners i FROM: Bruce K. Anderson, Direct DATE: February 27, 1980 DEPARTMENT OF PARKS, RE: Maintenance Standards As you're aware the park maintenance division is currently "split" between the public works department and the parks and recreation department. Mr. Larry Decheine, Superintendant of Public Works is responsible for the daily supervision of the two park maintenance men and all related supervisory responsibilities such as work assignment, priorities, vacation and sick leave, disciplinary actions, etc. The Parks, Recreation and Forestry Department is in turn responsible for the budgetary and billing process as well as long range plannine Dab_ a:,1 for the split is that it has been felt that because Park Main- tenance has been so dependant upon the public works pool of manpower and equip- ment that it was of greater benefit to have one major overseer of the entire division. The park maintenance division has experienced tremendous retrenchment during the past four years (48.3% reduction since 1980 - see staff mere dated 12/17/79) and staff is currently exploring different management solution; to resolve the exist- ing problems. The intent of the memo is not to discuss the pros and cons of our current park maintenance situation but rather to receive some direction from the Commission regarding park maintenance standards. Staff has been meeting with the park directors of Shoreview, New Brighton and Arden Hills as well as School District #621 staff during the past three months to establish maintenance standards for both the City and School District proper- ties. A copy of our final draft has been enclosed for your review on Thursday. Staff will be reviewing the standards in depth to explain what our current prac- tice has been as well as some projected costs to meet the prescribed standards. In addition to reviewing the standards as presented, staff will be seeking policy direction from the Commission regarding the extent and scope that the City should be involved with the maintenance of school district property. This is the major issue that the school district and municipality are currently trying to iron out. Page 2 February 27, 1989 The questions that will have cu be addressed are as follows: 1. Since Mounds View has already contributed with cash for the development of the outside facilities, should we be exempt from providing maintenance for the said facility? 2. Can Mounds View realistically afford to maintain additional acreage when the City Maintenance Budget has been reduced by approximately 6Z over the last three years? 3. Should the City be responsible for maintaining school district facilities for school sanctioned programs? 4. Should the City expect the school district to provide well groomed and maintained facilities as part of the permit agreement when it is issued? 5. Can the City be asked to provide a higher level of maintenance on a school district facility than they currently provide in the City park system? 6. In addition to the cash contribution the City has made for Edgewood, the City also has expended a great deal of in -kind services as far as staff time, equipment usage, and private consulting work. Should this issue be raised as part of the City's contributions to date? 7. Since the City of Mounds View is currently the only community that has a Joint Powers Agreement with the school district, should we insist that the school district adhere to the policy already in existence? The most important question that the municipalities and school district are wrestling with is; which agency 1s ressponsibl fnr the t.,ric associati.on9? -i s:" Lhat this question is of wu,jor impoL �u ._. i- cnut the athletic asss., tions are the greatest users of the school facilities and the majority of the athletic associations are organized on a school district basis. Staff does not foresee the Commission being able to respond in deta:l to each of the questions raised by staff, but policy direction and guidance is required. 19®- PRODS niti PURIC SCHOMS 0621 AND CITY OF PIAMTERAOCE AGFf.EWC FOR OuTD 0R FACILITIES P40 ON VLNT MMEIs.. IIaE[Eirt �.. . AND 57AMAt05 OF ARIKUHAICE City of - E :bads Ate: 5uml D;atrlct . SD _ a _ sllisrE�Aste _. - lYtth s Nrii Ifar T jum Joy �� AWJ-t j sevlimbr -*Ubm_ Lomb. ftc~- . ...1MloR_- �,..�T'l ..5. mm mm it um ... Wit. ...T : 'd':F" .ri T. !! • { r sartttt ! Y1 ;.. 1. IL samch IL --scarifyinv_ mmd fentml _ - - ' r-.._. 14 ._...i I t _._• ' _- _j ., _.. ., - 1J +� a-� eel°`} -- - # -- • ... � ... . _. � ... � ,- � � I � I .. . i 1: �: - . . , t... . ..... 1 ...... ::..: . J W OIARE af�liLDS _-.� b'i ._�..;��SattLiljiEoyt6.11 Iwftelr _— i�- rs� _L 15.E _----'----.� -- «� -__;;r�..y: -*r i -•.. _-1 A i .. _. _7. 1. ..._- .:..} .i_�... �.._ }l�j. .-a �i: I77- 41taeNLXKJ ,a, .. . ... .. .. _. ..... .. __ _.._. ,� '.+!_' _t•-'� •4_i -_: ..«.: , _..._ _.:..•� s __...+ ...: •�. +'. L.. 23 � fit"} - '--`._._:_ _...- � --� - -•^-I ---•. �-I.Z..�: __:f i ._.. ' ...__� .-....�_...a —.._ �I � �tLrj, Ll..r-w— , •*-{ 'I .. �� , .. �---• a t-.T ,L comimolw— ;�� a senire�aciteru�laae__' _� _.__.. fi ....;_ � _........`-�;---. ..:j �..__ :'; - -...f• �_ _�:••-._ YC' � , s, L- fonspan fort: - tl -- -�' _ _''" _ -- - -'i ';, -- •-i-...«• .YT.i, ...!" n' ,wit.. on*— orate+ /o>ialllSoKbIL• - � _, r _ -I � Ij I �t i i i lr+!-1 +.*, t•"7 � l i-r 'iT' i r:tt T:.�T. Tri 7 -� 4 11I -AM . - ,!o! 1980 - POIN13S VIEW PUBLIC SCHOOLS I621 AHD 'ITV OF W 1117, - nit AGREFI[NT FOR AND STANDARDS OF MttMTENAMCE OUTOW FACILIT10 SAS£D 41 40%T - OIIEIS ASAEEJEW--. C1tF of - C Vaimis Vier School Dtstrict - SO .da,rua PAIDTENANC£ .. MiLmh , A11,r11 h llsy *An r ,1■1y I; #. 6lackypAylt-..trrr.-Arm.:.J:.i-• � , - _� IL _n3wractma- ' ..-ah. tUia9-..._._. _ _.. 1,•.�:: �.._ii..; � ...ii } ...}..j : ..:,. i l l.. ]ce It1■a_--bostsls - ;.::: , .. � � ..::. - + a:. .. l . l ... , ..: :li DrlTwsyslParkIMITntls� 1 � I .. 1. fecim a. resur h. Using c.- bromime.=vlarin - ,.._.;4.- :di .-A—low■ lklo is erpall—+�..�,..,^_ '", ]ti_Luat�BdisliibAaCtL .�. }. •; � - , • i - •.`- •' t• . � � 1 � r � 21 771r._LMNOSdIPlAG _ . _ --- -.-••t--}�.....-.�-:......»1 i.._ _s_.,i. - • t°._.-A._ Tr■as. Shrubs _ .. ...� ..,.i ....... "'--IA.-Ptd lLsl to-..-'----._..7 ..._._..-. _-, }. i-...j. .....i L ..-.. 1 °�..A..g�=■A1..t.. _._..... �-- y Zak A'SChaArifq_ .._ ___ — i , li . ..'._{- < ,1. •:7.7 "+ "w.:�r.f.i+lllrstflM _.. �. �� ... jl =_... .... •. >L• i � 4 ttrlfrUlFFE%9F1MM.lk• Y♦ :f f ,.:}. ._.: F ...;. ji .. fi.j` 49 t II 0. 44 August s .Seata%tr Ta&%ObW- .3. a .-.}..i � ;1.. i.i. T .f llershee - i. j_ ? �1 --DVArher. I: i .LAM—j, raTs■sue j - M, I i '1�0{I 'I i{ I !• •. N ... :1 --._.. .. .J L, ... ti-...j.. .. _� --1� .i d_. ,ii Ij J%.i_ �� •T_-'}_1 -t'�`• ".*'f_F..y.j...-_y�yr_—_+1'-.�1i.-� � J-_ -i� i�j'� , 11- ,' z .......Y....-_ _.. _ 1--r1 .�Ll 711 I1I . _ `- .'�_.. ...�.. ...-•r- •t^-i •T T': y" L YR 41 171 tit - //M before dally ,age . ■n, once/ureklnanih r • All Activities art based on - rzrz Annually - •••• as needed proper Installation.... >rUtiM Y1_Cs SCHOOLS OUTSI01 FALil11 [ES rdINTTN-''h_STx�:^.!.t�S Standard: Nalnitmnct required for satisfactory file/facility usage. APPIC Pitt DUNE JULT AUG_ SfPI _-�OL T`^NO1_ CFPIANRTION Reutine mintemnce Area/Activity A. Grais Areas for 51te: ••xx a,aR xaRE uxx xiaa Rx.a a,•• eaalaAse very-%cecle. I, Ne:1ng 2. Irie ••u a:xa AARA a,ia ,:., Rxu KE•• Z.:Yoekly, O Z. Neatly etniau every to ■Sets. 3. AS per ncamended so111syllee schedule. 3. INtering 6, baseball/softball Infitld: '•// //// /1// /!!/ /1/1 //J! !/•• 1. Day Of rich me/ConferanCt rose. 1. Drat 2. flee Playing Fields ••/l //!/ /!l/ lilt 1/11 tilt 2. Day of each Leaggue/Conference Gees. C. Football/Soccer initelds: xxER a tfticA/lasenth. 1. line Playing Fields ..MR AUX KEMA AREA ERia 2. or1. Point D. Trash Refuse: t. Once/seek or as meded. 1. pick l; Site _ 2. Empty ocepticles ••AA ••AR l,xr rr.r ERxR AERR rExE xaxa xxxx Rape xxxx iA sx.x -X .. 2. Onet%mck or as needed. E. Tmmis Courts: 1. inspect Nets/Standards --Al sax% ■Eva xxxx x... AAxR 1. DnCe/•lek. !. iightentRopatr ... 9. As needed. F. Volleyball Courts: IT: DnCe/uelk. 1. inspect Rets/Standards ••AA A." xism Ai.a Alga 2. As needed. 2, llghteNRepalr ... G. Site Inspection: 1 a AREA 1. Once/stet. 1. Total Overview 2. York Orders/Repair Rag KEaa Rx.A xxRx RKEa xa.■ 1 . 2. As needed. Seasdml/Periodic IYlntenancd A. Gross Area a: 1. iartlltling rr.. 1. Once/year. 7. Seeding .22. ...t a... 2. Once/year. 7. Wed Central sr.. 3. Once/year. {. Aereties - :a.. ..0 e. Once/year. B. irrigation System: 1. once/month. 1. Inspection For Effectiveness ..a. ..a.. ..a.. ..a. ..a. ..x. ..x. ..i. tor.. 2. Once/year. --- 2. Draining. _. C. /asoba11/3oftball leflvldl: t. Once/yearly. 1. Scarify 2. Agllw RePlacemnt ..et ..tr 2. As needed/lnspecllan/wort order. 3. Impact late Anchors ..a% ..RR RAKE xxxx x.KE Ax.a Rr- 3. Neekly O. /eaeee/Signs/Rerrlerl/GuAn anti 1. ReMIr ... . . . . .. . . 1. As needed/lnspactlonJwrl order. E. Tamils Coert/llscl lop Surface$: 1. Rosorface/llnlng 1. Five yy�ear cycle. 2. Crack Repair ..sr 2. Annaelly. F. Oriversyt/FaWag/Trat1 Areas: I.126cfeclne I. 9e=r�l nntlnspectieMxork order. 7. lini iK.; v./inspectia;: sz=rL order. 3. After snowfall. 3. Sno+►Twag Link G. Shrds: 1. We .tt. 1. Annual. 2. Ilstor .. - 2. As meded/ImzWtleNwrk Order- N. OeacMs/lleaahors/llke Racks: 1. Repair 1. As maded/lnspectleNuork order. S. Orlocstlen/Stenp ... ... ... ... 2. As rseeded/wel order. 1. Helm Evert Pita/Volleyball Caurtr 1. Sang Replacement t. ReSed oMinsPectieMaork order. 2. Perimeter Repair 2, based an/impectleMwrk order. 0. Track: 1. LrfKe Napesr zr 1. Anneal 2. Wagging .. .. .. . ... ... 2. As nemded/inspeetioMeort Ord". R. water Fountain: 1• Clean a I. As mMN/taaFectloMnerk order. 2. Waif t. Annually L. Ice Surfac s: 1. plow 1. plow 2. guard Conatruction/Repair N. Storage Wilding: 1. Repair N. lIJIVIS MPonce/larkilll/Tennis; 1. Repair ...• ...• ...• ...• ...• ...• ,..• ...• 1. As needed/lnspettieMuork order. _ , I ,'. 07'.11':T � . n."n cif of V0Fj9ViQW !io rani ��n,u.v.�� M(•l!N'. C'v ,1!NN N;6 ?M5 AFPER-_SCHOOL ACTiVITI' _PROCKAM - RF.POR'f February 28, 1980 Mounds View Parks, Recreation & Forestry Department staff felt that a need for an after -school activities program for elementary age children may be existing. Therefore, a short survey was established and distributed to the elementary schools including Pinewuod, Red Oak, Sunnyside and Compassion Christian schools. The survey was randomly distributed to five students per class and two classes per grades first through 2ixth. The survey was accom- panied by a self addressed stamped envelope. Of the approximately two hundred surveys distributed, eighty-three were returned, tht3 providing for a very adequate tool for program data composition. Plea ->, refer to the survey data sheet for further reference. Considering the feedback information of the returned surveys, it was determined that an after -school program was definitely a need and an interest. Furthermore, it was determined that a fun and recreational program was re- quested rather than a competitive team program. The program content of the After -School Activities Program was specifically designed with the input re- ceived by the survey in mind. It is the goal of the After -School Activities to provide a well-rounded program of recreational activity opportunities for elementary age school children during the after -school hours. The month of March was chosen because it seems to be a interim month between Winter and Spring activities in which the weather Is unpredictable and basically blah. Also, it is during this month that tra- ditionally both school and Recreation Dopartments fail to rogram activites. Therefore, in ittcwi Mast, mood. . Ql;rt t t!' ..:I L at ttmw; I to perk the recreational interests of students and provide lots of activities for lots of fun? I''1 I NI11 �11 N1 t,I I':. HFL'H EAT ON AND I1)HLST Cif9 of voundg vigw HAM5E Y ('1111Ni Y MINNE V)TA :401 MI'IIWAM 10 MOUNDS VIEW, MINN 5'i 11T 1114 1R55 MEMO TO: Pinewood & Red Oak Teachers FROM: Mounds View Parks, Recreation & Forestry Dept. DATE. January 15, 1980 RE: Leisure Hours Survey As you can see, Mounds View Parks, Recreation & Forestry Department is conducting a short survey to help us determine the leisure time needs of after -school hours of elementary age children at Pinewood Elementary and Red Oak Elementary Schools. We ask that five children randomly be given the surveys attached to this memo. Please encourage the five children to take the survey home and have their parents compete and return it in the self-addressed, stamped envelope. Thank you for your cooperation. MEMO 10: Bruce Anderson FROM: Jeff Stottlemyer DATE: February 27, 1980 RE: Skating Rink Season End Report All warming houses have been checked and thoroughly looked at to see what has disappeared or broken during the course of the skating season. one of the problems we had this year was keeping shovels and brooms inside the warming houses, not carefully watching who was using them caused a number of shovels to be stolen. Brooms were being used primarily by kids making snow caves or what have you. There was three weeks left in the program when we bought six new shovels and two brooms. We also had problems with vandalism occuring at a couple of parks so we bought new locks to replace the old ones. Because of the vandalism we had two Mounds View Parks, Recreation 6 Forestry jackets stolen, the sites where they were stolen from were Lambert and Hillview. WHAT WENT WELL One thing that the attendants did well was to be friendly and courteous with all skaters. Whenever T was around which was quite often, the attendants were helping kids put on their skates for them, talking with parents and even played some games with the skaters. The attendants were very firm with the skaters. They did not allow the skaters to get the best of them. It took some encouragement but once it was through to the attendants, they were keeping the buildings clean. They were good in letting the supervisor know of any problems occuring, for example a hockey board isn't ingood condition, accurate accident reports and anything damaging to the warming house. The attendants madethe Kid-Naper Activity Day at the rink a big success, regard- less of the poor weather we had. PROBLEMS DURING THE SEASON The problems that occurred were the caase ❑f the supervisor not stressing what should be done about them at the weekly braff meetings. The supervisor did not use the weekly staff meeting the way 2t was supposed to be used. Attendants did not clear the skating areas during the light snow fall. Attendants did not keep track of their shovels, scrapers and brooms. Problem for the first part of the season was the use of our alternates, scheduling being mixed up. The supervisor not knowing who worked, when and where. Supervisor caught that problem and soon corrected it. WHAT CHANCES COULD BE MADE Being that this is the first year the supervisor ever ran an ice skating rink program, he really couldn't see any changes needed. Maybe if he were to be the supervisor for a couple of seasons, he could see some changes to make. Page 2 February 27. 1980 Oakwood There are a number of small holes in the ceiling of the warming house. These holes were in the ceiling at the start of Lite skating season. The walls are clear of graffiti and the floor and benches are in good condition. The wire cage that surrounds the heater is still in good condition, no major dents or holes in it. What was left in building: 2 of 4 snow scrape shovels 1 of 2 shovels 1 of 1 broom ( good condition) 1 of 1 trash can All lights were checked and work. The satelite is in good condition. Hiliview At Hillview the walls have a lot of graffiti on them and was cleaned as best as it could be. This was a problem during most of the season that really wasn't taken into too much consideration. A couple of holes had been put in the ceiling by hockey sticks. The spring on the door should be looked at before Hillview is opened as a playground. The satelite is in good condition. Hillview was vandalized and a jacket was stole. What was left in the building: 1 of 4 snow scrape shovels 1 snow scrape shovel broken (handle missing) 2 of 2 shovels 1 of 1 broom (had been replaced during season) 1 of 1 trashcan All lights are in working order.(Note: it is too dreary in the warming house at night because there are not enough lights). Lambert This warming house was well -kept all year. Although we had a couple of occasions where there was a lot of graffiti an the walls. The graffiti was removed as well as possible, -because of that the walls have scuff marks on them. The wire cage surrounding the heater is in good condition, no major dents or holes. The nets need to be fixed along with the spring on the door. The jacket the attendants wear was stolen All lights were checked and they work. The satelite has a big hole on the top right !!and side. What was left in the building. 3 of 4 snow scrape shovels 2 of 2 shovels 1 of 1 broom 1 of 1 trash can Page 3 February 27, 1980 Greenfield This is another warming house that was kept clean all year but like Lambert had a few instances in which a lot of graffiti was on the walla. The walla were thoroughly cleaned. There is a hole about one foot in diameter in the floor right by the door. The wood has rotted underneath the floor mat. The nets should be fixed along with the spring on the door. The satelite to in good condition. All lights were checked and work. The wire cage surrounding the heater is in good condition, no dents or holes. Woodcrest The warming house was well kept, no grafitti an the walls and the benches were always clean. All lights were checked and work The spring on the door should be fixed What was left in the building 2 of 4 snow scrape shovels 2 of 2 shovels 1 of 1 broom 1 of 1 trash can 74 1 MOUNDS VIEW PARR AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT 2401 Highway 10 7E4-3055 WEEKLY REPORT OF ,:=i PARK SKATIFG RINK ATTENDANCE REPORT DAY DATE WEATHER AND ESTIMATED ATTENDANCE TOTAL HOURS TEMPERATURE MORN. AFT. EVE. TOTAL OPEN REMARKS Children Sunday - Adults Monday Children Tuesday Teens r. Adults Thursday Children a Teensy Adults Friday Children 4 Teens < silts Saturday Children �- Rink Attendant signature HOUNDS VIEW PARK AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT 2401 Highway 10 7e4-3055 WEEKLY REPORT OF \ ! f : 'c i PARK SKATIrG RINK ATTENDANCE REPORT nAV DATE WEATHER AND ESTIMATED ATTENDANCE TOTAL HOURS nvav YPMAARS Sunday TEMERA-lumm ildren Oeens ALults - ------ -- Monday Children Teens dolts Tuesday Children Teens dults Children Wednesday Teens dolts Children Thursday Teens ults Friday ildren Teens silts Children f Saturday eees ulta Rink Attendant signature MCVNDS VIEW PARK AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT 2401 Highway 10 784-3055 WEEKLY REPORT OF L_ ✓ - l l` PARK SKATING, RINK ATTENDANCE REPORT r DAY DATE WEATHER AND ESTIMATED ATTENDANCE TOTAL HOURS rvmaa •rttvv vnnv .ew. ....,... $ ' Children i O'� Teens I Adults 3 !Monday Children Teens dults Tuesday Children q0 Teens dolts I 'Z RtAk Atteo nt sltmature HOUNDS VIEW PARK AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT 2401 Highway 10 7E4-3055 WEEKLY REPORT OF I `r PARR SKATING RINK ATTENDANCE REPORT .� ziw, - DAY DATE HEATHER AND ESTIMATED ATTENDANCE TOTAL HOURS afnRM AFT_ EVE. TOTAL OPEN REMARKS Sunday Children eens Adults t ' Monday Children eens d is Tuesday Children _ 1 seas w dults Children L. Wednesday eens ul is Thursday i drea Teens r' T ults 1ldren Friday eens ss it ren Saturday seas is DAY DATE Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday MOUNDS VIEW PARK AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT 2401 HiFhvay 10 784-3055 WEEKLY REPORT OF f PARK SKATIVG RINK ATTENDANCE REPORT WEATHER AND ESTIMATED ATTENDANCE TOTAL HOURS TEMPERATURE MORN. AFT. EVE. TOTAL OPEN REMARKS Children Teens Adults a Children r� Teens a Adults Children Teens jvx- Adults _ 8ir MEMO TO: Mr. Jeff Nelson, City Administra41... 1 FROM: Bruce K. Anderson, Director, Paron1 R Forestry DATE: February 6, 1980 RE: Silver View Park Consultant Services Attached is a contract proposal from Short -Elliott -Hendrickson, Inc. for a engineer feasibility report relating to Silver View Park pond development. As can be noted, I have asked Mr. Boxrud to address five salient issues regarding the pond construction which I feel have direct bearing on the feasibility of the Kraus/Anderson proposal. The specific issues that will be addressed are: 1. Evaluate the proposal as it relates and/or conforms to Resolution #983. 2. Assess the feasibility of actual pond construction specifically relating to the bike trail, sledding hill, and acutal pond construction. 3. Review the entire project from the City's perspective and offer possible alternatives. 4. Approximate the potential maintenance costs to the City once completed. 5. Address the issue of using the pond as a future swimming beach and address what types of filtration systems would be necessary. As can be noted S.E.H. is proposing that the study will cost approxi- mately $1,000 to $2,000 and will be completed for Council review prior to February 25, 1980. Whereas, the City is potentially considering investing over $500,000 in city, state, and federal money in the development of Silver View Park and; Kraus/Anderson will be developing the surrounding area with a multi -million dollar project. Staff would recommend that the City Council fund the engineering feasibility of the pond at a cost not to exceed $2,000. In addition to the enormous sums of money involved in the project, the following issues do directly impact the need for a study: 1. Storm water drainage issues, specifically relating to Resolution #983. 2. Future development considerations of the City that will be affected by the pond. 3. Future park development plans, especially those relating to state and federal funding. Page 2 4. As we do not have resident engineer it is imperative that the City hire a consultant to review the proposed plans from the City's perspective. 5. The projected costs for pond maintenance will be a major consideration in the final project approval. Based on the aforementioned criteria, Staff would recommend approval of the proposed contract with the project funded from one of three budgets: 1. Administrative charges at time of building 2. Existing 1980 Engineering Consultant budget 3. City Contingency Account I£ you have any questions regarding the attached proposal or Staff's position on this issue, feel free to give me a call at extension ##41. SHORT-TI INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS NI. 1'At!1 %I1%N1N(.IF % ( IIII-I'LAVA IA1 LS, VVIS( ONSIN February 6, 1980 RE: MOUNDS VIEW, MINNESOTA SILVER VIEW PARK/OAK LAKE PARK ADDN. OUR FILE NO. 77039 city of Mounds view 2401 highway #10 Mounds view, Minnesota 55112 Attention: Bruce Anderson, City Parks Director Gentlemen: As requested by city staff at a meeting with Bruce Anderson and Daniel Boxrud on January 31, 1980, we herein submit our proposal to review the proposed Kraus-Anderson/City Park Development in the vicinity of the Scotland Green Apartments. Our understanding of the work required is as follows: 1. Evaluate the developers proposals relative to sound engineering practice and conformance with the resolution #983. 2. Assess the feasibility of constructing the proposed lake, bike trail, related sliding hill, and the possibility of constructing these facilities at the proposed cost limit of $250,000. 3. Recommend features to be considered as part of the develop- ment which would be desirable or required from the city's standpoint. 4. Approximate the likely maintenance that will be required of the lake due to incoming sediment load from storm water, possible shoreline erosion, etc. 5. Address the proposed lake as to it's suitability as a swimming beach and recommend features or facilities to maintain the proper water quality including but not limited to possible filtration systems. We have been in contact with the developers engineer. The engineer indicates that the final design proposal is still under development and will not be submitted for about one week. Therefore, we can zw HIt15BOROEIGH OfHCI H1DG • 2353 RICE STRfII • ST. PAt 1, NUNN[NOTA 55111 0 P)IONE 1612) 4b4•0272 City of Mounds View File #77039 February 6, 1980 r Page 2 only give an approximation of the engineering review cost which the city may incur on this project. We estimate that our review and recommendations as listed in a preceeding paragraph would cost between $1,000 and $2,000 plus the cost of a consulting limnologist if, after reviewing the submitted proposal, we feel their services are required. The estimated engineering review costs should not be construed to be a maximum not to exceed figure, but only an estimated fee range. We propose to perform our review on an hourly basis in conformance with the current Agreement for Engineering Services between the City of Mounds View and Short -Elliott -Hendrickson, Inc. Assuming timely receipt of the developers most recent design proposal, we would attempt to have our review complete by the February 25th City Council Meeting. If you need anything further or have any questions, please advise. Sincerely* s � ger ir. short RBS/cih M RESOLUTION NO. 1014 CITY 01' ?SOUNDS VIEW COUNTY O!' RAMSEY ';TATU ill' M I NNI'SC ITA APPOINTMENTS TO CIT`.' COUNCIi, C'OMMISSION WHEREAS, the City Council through its municipal codes has created certain L'onunissxons I.(-) advis(: t I'M And; WHEREAS, the Mayor from time to times appoints or reappoints commission members; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVE[) that the CiCy Council hereby confirms the following appointments made by the Mayor: PLANNING COMMISSION: Peg Mountin 3 years Chairman 1980 - 1982 Sharon McCarthy 3 years 1980 - 1982 Wally Skiba 7 011rs 1980 - 1982 Jean Miller Member Designate 1980 PARKS 6 RECREATION: Wayne Burmeister 3 years 1980 - 1982 Donna Bowman 3 years 1980 - 1982 Marilyn Dennehy 3 years 1980 - 1982 LAKESIDE PARKS: Barb Stone 3 year. 1960 - 1982 1 Vacancy HUMAN RIGHTS: 1 Vacancy Joan Godeke 3 years 1980 - 1982 POLICE CIVIL SERVICE: Glen Dawson 3 year_. 1980 - 1982 FESTIVITIES COMMISSION: 1980 - 1982 1. Shirley Munholand b. ;dark Mark 2. Barb McCluskey 7. Fran; holm 3. Sandra Shackle 8. Lorna Holm 4. Karen Leverentz 9. Gene: Anderson 5. Dorothy Willhaus i, s is f� ' m RESOLUTION NO. 1084 Page 2 Adopted this 25th day of Fobtuary, 1980. ATTEST: (SEAL) r C er n at a or i C(t4of Vow s View IiAM;(Yf .)NIY MINN[ n0lA _ 1401 I4 Ili AWAY 16 MOUNU51/IEW. MINN. 55112 r)r-1nAL NT OI 1'A I+1. )R4:1055 RECREATION %NO Fft R151RY MEMO TO: Pinewood & Red Oak Teachers FROM: Mounds View Parks, Recreation & Forestry Dept. DATE: January 15, 1980 RE: Leisure Hours Survey As you can see, Mounds View Parks, Recreation & Forestry Department is conducting a short survey to help us determine the leisure time needs of after -school hours of elementary age children at Pinewood Elementary and Red Oak Elementary Schools. We ask that five children randomly be given the surveys attached to this memo. Please encourage the five children to take the survey home and have their parents complete and return it in the self-addressed, stamped envelope. Thank you for your cooperation. FAKK Z(o.b A&. mf-v1ut4 Mill * utiO9 M& A&M I"i-SM" '00 iM FAIMil'WR 40' 0' VY' NK K-1 "mi&Lt. FRAIL-y hG LAMP &MEN ArAKIMMV7 io.4 A&. )MIT I PARK *4 A(,. DEPARTMENT OF PARKS, cit 0fVoRi9view RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNES07A 2401 HIGHWAY 10 MOUNDS VIEW, MINN. 551;2 784-3055 RECREATION AND FORESTRY 1 MEMO TO: hounds View Planning Comnissi,ow FROM. Bruce K. Anderson., Parks, Recreatieh Forestry Director (� DATE: March 17, 1980 RE: Silver View Park Acquisition and Development In response to the park related questions that have been raised inregards to the preliminary development proposal for the parcel bounded by Highway 10, Silver Lake Road, Long Lake Road, County Rd. I and County Road H2 I have prepared the following background information: 1. The City of hounds View currently holds fee simple title to 16.9 acres of park land at the intersection of County Road H-2 and Silver Lake Road. 2. The original grant for additional acquisition of park land for Silver View Park was submitted by the City of Mounds View in August of 1976. Mr. Douglas Bryant was the Director of the Parks and Recreation Depart- ment at that time and the grant was originally approved at $105,000. for funding in 1977_ This grant application was for the acquisition of approximately 19 acres of land directly north of the City's existing park land. 3. The original grant was not processed properly in 1977 which made for a two year delay in receiving the final acquisition's approval which was finally granted to the City on June 25, 1979. 4. The acquisition grant has been finalized and approved in the amount of $136,800.00 which is broken down as follows: $34,200.00 - City of Mounds View share, $34,200.00 - State Funds and $68,400.00 - Federal share, The City share has been set aside through 1978 revenue sharing funds. 5. Mr. Doug Bryant resigned his position with the City in August, 1977 and was then appointed as the Director of Parks and Recreation in November, 1977. 6. In July, 1978 I submitted a grant application for the Phase I development of Silver View Park based on the acquisition of land north of the City's existing land. March 17, 1980 Page 2 7. The Phase 1 development of Silver View was also approved for a total �- of $105,1D0.00 including trail development monies. Development slated for Phase I includes: Site improvement $18,264 Water System 20,000 Ballfield 9,550 Parking lot and access road 30,360 Design and engineering 6,500 Pathway/bikeway system 18,676 Audit 1,750 Total $105,100 8. We were informed by the State Planning Agency not to begin formal negotiations for the land acquisition until June 25, 1979 9. Since that time City staff has met with Kraus -Anderson, owners of the land in question. on six seperate occassions, and they submitted a counter proposal (see enclosed maps) to the City which would involve a land "swap" of the City's existing land for land on the northwest corner of Silver Lake Road and County Road I. 10. Staff concurs with Kraus -Anderson that this proposed land swap would benefit both parties and we have continued to explore this possibility. 11. As of 3/17/80, the City has not consumated any land sale, but we will be requesting conceptual approval from the City Council on March 24, 1980. 12. Resolution #996 was adopted by the City Council on July 9, 1979, which authorized staff to begin negotiating with K/A for the land purchase. The aforementioned I2 points quickly bring you up to our current position which is basically two -fold: 1. Kraus/Anderson is not willing to negotiate a seperate land swap agree- ment at this and would like to deal with the issue as an entire entity, including surrounding land use, etc. 2. The original grant acquisition was for a different parcel of land than our present recommendation. We have received preliminary approval from the State but they are still requesting additional support material. Specifics of the land swap are outlined on the five enclosed maps. A brief description of each of the enclosed maps is as follows: Definitions: 1. Originall L.A.k.C.0.N. Grant - This was the grant submitted in ugA ust, 1976. 2. Revised L.A.W.C.O.N. Grant - This is the land that is being proposed for Acquisition in 1980. 1. Map 01 - This map shows two items. a. The 16.9 acres the City presently owns. b. The area labeled L.A.M.C.O.N. is the original 19 acres of land that was proposed in the original grant submitted in August, 1976. March 17, 1980 Page 3 2. Map #2 - This map clarifies the proposed land "swaps" that are being considered by the City of Mounds View, Kraus/Anderson, and State Planning Agency: a. Parcel #1 (existing 16.9 acres of City park land) is being "swapped" for Parcel #4 (16.9 acres of Kraus/Anderson property). b. Parcel #2 (approximately 10 acres of land which was originally proposed in August, 1976) will remain as Kraus/Anderson property and Parcel #3 (property owned by Kraus/Anderson, 12 acres in size) will be purchased with the revised L.A.W.C.O.N. grant monies. The "striped" area (7 acres) is slated for acquisition under both the original and revised grant pro- posals. 3. Map #3 - This map outlines the final 19 acres that would be acquired with the revised grant proposal totalling $136,800. Once again, the only difference between the original and the revised grant is the "swap of existing park land and to purchase 12 acres north of the original site. 4. Map #4 - This map shows the final park location which wil total approximately 53.2 acres of land including a 12.8 acre pond area. 5. Map #5 - This map defines the final park boundary (solid line) with the proposed locations of facilities within the park parameter. In addition to the map clarification, we have had three appraisals completed on the property. The appraisers price is as follows: (appraisals were completed in September, 1979) City owned property - $135,000. or $9,000/acre Proposed acquisition - $365,000. broken down as follows: 9 acres of commercial land @ $23,000. = $207,000. and 19.5 acres of residential land @ $8.000. _ $156,000. - Total $363,000. or $12,750 + / acre. The City's revenue and or assets for the land swap is as follows: a. $136,800. - L.A.W.C.O.N. Grant b. 10% Land dedication of the 96.48 acres or 9.5 acres valued @ $121,125. c. 15 acres valued @ $135,000. or 9,000/acre Total City assets $392,925. The City would be acquiring the following: a. 28.5 acres valued @ $365.000. b. 25 acres of ponding, easements etc. valued @ $250.000. - $350,000. C. Trails development valued @ $45,000. Proposed City acquisition = $660,000.- 760,000. In addition to the aforementioned financial figures which are very difficult to pinpoint the following planning considerations have been reviewed by staff and the proposed land swap as presented would be favorable to the City's needs: 1. Soil types 2. Topography 3. Development costs March 17, 1980 Page 4 4. Ingress and egress 5. Hydrology analysis r" 5. Vegetation analysis 7. Surroundinc land use Staffs time line on this issue is that the acquisit'fon and or land swap must be final- ized prior to June 1, 1980 so that the initial planning can be completed prior to the phase one development projects scheduled to commence in the middle of June. 1 will be in attendance at your March 19, 1980 meeting to clarify any questions you may have regarding the process we have followed to date. If you should have questions prior to Wednesday, feel free to give me a call at 784-3055, ext.#41. DEPARTMENT OF PARKS. R£CRE ATION ANO FOHESTRV March 26, 1980 C1f ours W RAMSE V COUNTY, MINNESOTA 2401 HIGHWAY 10 MOUNDS V IEW. MINN. 5B112 78&3OBS Dear Parks and Recreation Commissioners: Enclosed is your packet of information for the Thursday, March 27, 1980, Park Commission Meeting scheduled for 6:30 PM in the City Hall Council Chambers. The two major items we will be discussing are an update on Silver View Park and the joint powers agreement for Edgewood Junior High School. Staff will be presenting additional back- ground information at the meeting on both issues, prior to requesting a formal recommendation. In addition, staff has requested that Dr. George Christensen and John Ostlund from the school district be present to review the proposed joint powers agreement from their prospective_ if you have any questions regarding the proposed agenda and/or the packet, feel free to give me a call at 784-3055, extension t41. Y BRA/sa MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA Regular Session February 28, 1980 Mounds View City Hall Council Chambers 6:30 p.m. Call to Order The Mounds View Parks and Recreation Commission was called to order at 6:35 p.m. by Chairman Wayne Burmeister. Roll Call Commissioners present - Chairman Burmeister, Commissioners Linke, Scott, Dennehy, Weflen, Bowman, Fedor and Silvis. Commissioners absent - Commissioner Kuluvar and Councilmember Ziebarth. Staff present - Director Anderson, Program Supervisor Kvalheim and Intern Stottlemyer. Visitors present - Gary Tushie, representing Saunders - Thalden and Associates, Inc., Jeff Nelson, Clerk Administrator and Mayor McCarty. Swearing -In Office Clerk -Administrator Nelson swore in all 1980 Parks and Rec- reation Commissioners. Minutes Commissioner Fedor made a motion to appove the minutes and Commissioner Scott seconded the motion. Motion passed. 8 ayes 0 nayes Comprehensive Director Anderson reviewed the update report on the progress Parks 6 Open of the Comprehensive Parks 6 Open Space Plan. Director Anderson Space Plan suggested that the Commission set three dates for public hearings Ugpdate of the plan. Gary Tushie reviewed the preliminary plan with the Commission. Preliminary Survey Tabulation has suggested that as to date: 65 -,.70Z return has been received from community bomea.;..... ijj§ -^turn bar been received fr, ,'n the aril ars.xments. 25% overall return from the 3600 surveys which were dis- tributed. Public Hearing Dates are scheduled for: • Thursday, April 10 from 7:00 - 9:00 p.m. for the City Hall, Lambert, Pinewood, Greenfield, Hillview 6 Oakwood Park areas. • Saturday, April 12 from 10:00 a.m. - 12:00 noon for the Groveland. Ardan and Red Oak Park areas. • Thursday, April 17 from 7:00 - 9:00 p.m. for the Lakeside Park, Silverview, Woodcrest, Random and Edgewood Park areas. Comissioner Scott made a motion to hold all three meetings at Minutes -2- February 28, 1980 City Hall, Motion was seconded by Commissioner Fedor. Motion passed. 8 ayes � 0 nayes Maintenance Director Anderson reviewed the issue of the maintenance of Standards school outdoor recreation facilities which is used by City residents and students. The Joint Powers Agreement maintenance criteria as set by School District #621 was reviewed. Comm- issioner Linke suggested that the City maintain the outdoor facilities during the summer if monetary support is received from the School District. Direct Anderson offered to collect data outlining the approximate time and cost of maintenance of school outdoor facilities in 1981. It was suggested that Dr. Christiansen from the School District be invited to the April Parks and Recreation Commission meeting. Also it was suggested that the Athletic Associations be informed of the difficulties with field maintenance so that they may lend some understanding to the problem. Commissioner Linke made a motion that the City can only maintain outdoor facilities at the same level as 1979 and that even though the Commission believes that the City can do a better job of main- taining school ballfields, the financial capacities are limited. Commissioner Scott seconded the motion. Motion passed. 8 ayes 0 nayes Commissioner Burmeister made a motion that the Parks & Recreation -- Commission feels the City is more cost effective in the maintenanc_- of outdoor facilities of the School District and therefore believes that the School District #621 should contribute total final costs for maintenance rendered by the City at school outdoor facilities. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Weflen. Motion passed. 7 ayes 0 nayee Commissioner Silvis made a motion that a meeting be held be,ween the Parks & Recreation Commission and School District #621. Commissioner Scott seconded the motion. Motion passed. 7 ayes 0 n wy It was also suggested that Public Works ;iuperinteudent Larry Decheine be present at the meeting. After -School Program Supervisor Kvalheim reviewed the new After -School Program. Program Winter Skating Student Intern Jeff Stottlemyer reviewed the 1980 Winter Skating Program Program. Staff Report Director Anderson reported that a new department secretary was hired. She is Sandy Wheaton. Also Director Anderson referred the Commission to a letter sent by Short-elliot-Hendrickson. Inc. Consulting Engineers itemising development costs for the proposed Kraus - Anderson/City Park Development. Finally, Director Anderson reporthed that there has not been any „ provisions in the budget for satellites at the parks. However, , there has been numerous complaints by residents of the community Minutes -3- February 28, 1980 because of the lack of toilet facilities in the parks. Commissioner ix Linke suggested that staff conduct a study to establish cost figures at ballfield parksites for the provision of satellites and the cost for permanent toilet structures inside a stationary building. Commissioner Scott seconded the motion. Motion passed. 7 ayes 0 nayes It was also suggested that the City Council become aware of this problem. Commissioner Linke requested information on portable park trailer house shelters. He also introduced Donna Bowman as the 1980 Lakeside Park Commission Chairperson. It was reported that a meeting between the Lakeside Park Commission and Ramsey County will be held March 17 at 7:30 a.m. at Metro Square Building. Adjournment Commissioner Weflen made a motion to adjourn. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Scott. Motion passed unanimously. The meeting adjourned at 8:50 p.m. MEMO TO:*Pow;es and Recreation Commissioners FROM: Staf DATE: Marc RE: Joinment/Edgewood Jr. High School Enclosed is a copy of a draft joint powers agreement from the School District which will supercede the agreement that was drafted on June 12, 1978. The agreement has been drafted to delineate and clearly define the responsibilities for the maintenance of the Edgewood Jr. High School facility. As can be noted in Copy E, the City will be responsible for the following: 1. Scarifying, dragging and replacing the ag-lime at the four softball/ baseball fields. (School District would expend any capitol money i.e. cost of ag-lime.) 2. Responsible for the maintenance of ice skating surface. 3. We would assume the responsibility of spot checking the tennis court nets and standards. 4. We would install and or locate corner anchors for the football/soccer fields and goal posts. 5. We would purchase and install ground sleeves as base anchors at each of the four fields. (Approximate one time cost would be $120.00) b. We would broom the trails once per year as part of our street sweeping contract. 7. We would be responsible for trimming on an as needs basis for the top athletic areay.ply. 8. Trash pick 'up removal for the four balIIieius wouiu ut uu, -pun- sibility. 9. Joint cooperation would be the key factor to ensure proper coordination and control regarding the scheduling of the site. As the City has been performing each of these maintenance responsibilities for the past two years staff would recommend that the City enter into the joint powers agreement as presented by the School District. As this is a formal policy ratification by the City Council and School Board will be required prior to final authorization. As similar joint powers agreements are being developed in our surrounding municipalities, staff would recommend that the policy be adopt- ed pending the adoptions of similar joint powers agreements in New Brighton, Shoreview and Arden Hills. In addition to the enclosed maintenance agreement, staff has met on numerous occasions with the school district to discuss the capitol outlay projects scheduled for completion in 1980 and 1981. The three major projects yet to be:. ' ;r completed are the installation of four lit tennis courts, multi -purpose building a' and installation of a four lane running track. This issue has not been resolved as there is a question as to whether the City should continue to expend capitol funds when our surrounding neighbors have not committed funds for capitoV ex penditures. The City's position at this tine has been to take a "wait and see" ... I- •.emu: ... ,su March 25 Page 2 attitude to determine if the positions of the surrounding communities and or school district should alter. ,.. Staff will be outlining the status of the joint powers agreements with Shoreview. New Brighton and Arden Hills in greater detail at the Thursday meeting. In addition staff has invited Dr. George Christensen, Director of Community Education and John Ostlund, Program Coordinator to review and discuss the proposed joint powers agreement. r- M, lndependen7 School D,strwl No 621 MOUNDS VIEW PUBLIC SCHOOLS /2959 NORTH HAMLtNE AVENUE / ST- PAUL, MINNESOTA 55113 / PHONE 636-3650 DR SANFORD c WITTER March 4, 1980 Supe.rnlendenr M E M 0 Revised March 24, 1980 TO- Bruce Anderson, Park, Recreation and Forestry Director of the City of Mounds View FROM: George Christenson and John Ostlund RE: Proposed Joint Powers and Maintenance Agreements for Edgewood Junior High School Outside Facilities (fields, etc.} and the Plans for Upgrading the Edgewood Outside Facilities Based on our many meetings/Pldrining sessions the materials for the proposed joint powers and maintenance agreements are ready for review by the City of Mounds View Park and Recreation Commission and then the City Council. This joint powers agreement would replace the one adopted June 12, 1978, copy attached... copy A. The goal and the objectives of the joint efforts are: GOAL - OVERALL: TO DEVELOP AND EFFECTIVELY MAINTAIN THE MIDDLE SCHOOLS' OUTSIDE FACILITIES (FIELDS, ETC.) FOR THE CONVENIENT USE OF THE SCHOOLS AND THE CITIES. OBJECTIVES: 1 tr^ ^rovide Tftj7 ^rod out cities (field areas, etc.; ,vt use by the -schools and>cties. 2. To jointly develop and maintain the sites at agreed to standards of maintenance. 3. To cooperatively plan for the use, scheduling of the use, and main- tenance of the outside facilities, thereby using the expertise from two staffs which should bring about better communications and more efficient operations of all parties, 4. To reduce the amount of duplication of proposed or existing facilities, thereby reducing the costs of development and maintenance for both the school district and the cities. S. To jointly share in the maintenance costs by designating which party will perform which tasks. This should reduce the duplicate purchase and operation of equipment and the duplication of labor costs. In support of these proposed Joint efforts to develop, schedule for use, use, and maintain the Edgewood Junior High School outside facilities, we present on the next pages the "Mounds View Schools Community Education Department and the Mounds View Parks and Recreation Department Facilitated Usage of the Area Schools." (copy B attached) Specifically look at the items checked which take place at IgdapoadeM school Otatnot No. 42l adhafaa to Um pnneipM that all p9mits *hall have equal opportunity and ame", ItO ua edueatt" Melatttae, eotivOlem. and waploym4M without reg&M to face, "sad, age, "X, er natlaeal Otte$.. -2- Edgewood Junior High School. The report also indicates the other activities which take place in/on city or school property. The purposes for the proposed joint powers agreement (copy C attached) are to: 1. Insure commitment by both the school district and the City of Mounds View to jointly schedule the use of and to maintain the outside facilities. 2. Insure that yearly maintenance agreements are developed and agreed to by both parties. 3. Insure that should either party not meet its agreements there are specific steps to be taken to review the reasons and to keep communica- tions open between the two administrations and the School Board and the City Council. 4. To set key check point dates for reaching agreements and for verifying the functioning levels of communications. The Mounds View Schools outside Facilities Maintenance Standards (copy D at- tached) were developed by the Park and Recreation Directors from the cities of New Brighton, Shoreview, Arden Hills, Mounds View; John Ostlund, Coordinator of Community Education; Mounds View School District staff members, Robert Chatfield, Coordinator of Operations; and Alex Gadacz, Supervisor of Maintenance and Grounds; George Christenson, Director of Community Education, Planning, Research and Re- porting Services; and have been reviewed by the assistant principals of the four middle schools. These standards are the basis for the setting of the maintenance agreements. The maintenance agreement (a copy of a partially completed form is attached - copy E) becomes the statement in writing as what each of the parties will do dur- ing a stated year. Based on the experience of both parties piu$ any new informa- tion, 1 n agreement would be de pad by March 15 for the coming y. r. A pos- sibil3 y'�;t;� have theagrir�t�igf s,cover a two (2) or thri:e�+ear percuu. In order to have this previously stated'`system work, the Edgewood Outside Facili- ties have to continue to be upgraded according to the plans developed by Bruce Anderson, the teachers, coaches and administration of Edgewood Junior High School and school district central office staff and administrators. A copy of the plan is attached. (copy F) A description of the "Outside Facilities - Capital Outlay Project Update, February 11, 1980... for Edgewood" is attached. (copy G) This describes which has been completed and what remains to be done. The actual costs and estimates for future work are also described in this report. We are looking forward to the meetings with the Park and Recreation Commission and the City Council where we will have the opportunity to discuss the proposal and plans in detail, and hopefully continue the mutually advantageous, formal joint powers relationships. COPY A RESOLUTION NO. 902 JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT REGARDING USE OF INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 621 OUTDOOR FACILITIES RESOLUTION OUTLINING THE DEVELOPMEMT OF THE OUTDOOR FACILITIES AT EDGEWOOD JR. HIGH SCHOOL THIS AGREEMENT, Made this 12th day of June , 1978 between the CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW, hereinafter referred to as the "CITY"and INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 621, hereinafter referred to as the "SCHOOL DISTRICT". WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, School District owns and operates Edgewood Junior High School in the City, the premises of which include certain outdoor facilities, said school sites delineated in red on the map attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit A, and it is th wucual des., o the Schoul District and the City to cooperate for the purposes of permitting said Outdoor Facilities to be used for the education and recreation activity programs of the School District and the City, and WHEREAS, the School District and the City desires to fill, grade and generally up -grade the Edgewood Jr. High School outside facilities to permit utilization, not only for the pupils of the School District, but also for the citizens of the School District and of the City. NOW.THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, That in consideration for the foregoing recitals and mutual covenants and promises herein set forth, it is hereby agreed by and between the School District and the City as follows: 1978 Edgewood Jr. High Complete re -grading Page 2 - Joint Powers ( Mounds View City - Edgewood Jr. High) 1. Installation, upgrading and repair. The City agrees to handle all the planning, development and in -kind cost for the following 4-year project outlining the development of outside facilities at Edgewood Jr. High School. The actual cost of the 4-year project will be shared by the School District and the City as indicated on a yearly basis. Estimated Cost Source of Revenue $ 5,000 $ 5,000 - District of site Irrigation system 15,000 15,000 - District Top dress and re -seed 15,000 15,000 - District all turf areas AgAime for infields 2,500 2,50D - District $37,500 $37.500 - District 1979 Edgewood Jr. High Construct four new $50,000 $25,000 - District, tennis courts asphalt, lighting, color cvaia.1 25,000 Mm View, Fencing, Sub total $50,000 $26,000 - District` $25,000 - Mound YieM is 1980 Edgewood Jr. High Resurface old tennis $ 7,000 $ 7,000 - District -courts Installation of 4 lane 10,000 4,000 -.District track 6,000 - Mounds View. Purchase of bleachers 5,000 �5,000 - District and benches Develop a trailway system 3,000 3,000 - District Knockdown hockey rink 4,000 410D0 - District< _ Sub Total =29,000 $23,000 - District 6,000 - Mounds. View, 1981 Edgewood Jr. High Construct an outdoor $30,500 $25,500 - District>.:..:::;::: multi -purpose building . --300 sq. feet restroom 5,000 - Mounds Y: J facility --600 sq. feet storage --300 sq. feet community room, warming house; $30,500 $25,Soo - District 5,000 - Mounds Yieu?,_ Page 3 - Joint Powers (Mounds View City - Edgewood Jr. High) 2. Easement for egress and ingress. School District hereby grants to the City, its agents and employees, and participants in its recreational activities, programs or events an easement for egress and ingress to said Outside Facilities so long as this Agreement is in effect. 3. Indemnification. a. School District's indemnification of City. The School District hereby agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the City against any and all claims for damages, of whatever nature, arising from or in consequence of the duties it has assumed hereunder and also arising from or in consequence of its operation, supervision, control or conducting of any of its recreational activities, programs or events or related activities utilizing said Outside Facilities. b. City's Indemnification of School District. City hereby agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the School Distrirt!ain�" any and all claims for damages of whatever nature, arising from or in consequence of the duties it has assumed hereunder and also arising from or in consequence of its operation, supervision, control or conducting of its recreational activities, programs or events or related activities utilizing said Outside Facilities. c. Nature and Extent of Indemnification. The indemnification set forth in the previous two subparagraphs of this Paragraph 3 shall Protect the indemnitee and its successors, from and against any and all actions, proceedings, claims, demands, costs, damages and expenses, including reasonable attorneys' fees which it may pay. sustain or incur. Page 4 - Joint Powers (Mounds View City - Edgewood Jr. high) 4. Use of Facilities. The School District hereby grants to the City permission and license to conduct at such times, after school hours and on weekends, as will not interfere with regular school curriculum and related activities, on said Outside Facilities, such recreational activities, programs, or events, as the City desires to conduct to utilize the Outside Facilities for the optimum benefit of citizens living within the School District in general and citizens of the City in particular. To this end, the School District shall upon execution of this Agreement furnish the Parks and Recreation Director of the City with a schedule of the dates and times on which the School District may be utilizing the said Outside Facilities in connection with its regular school curriculum and related activities. Use of the bySehoof facility be ti330. rrt 4a. It is understood that the parties will confer on a future agreement effecting maintenance of the facilities. 5. Termination. The parties may terminate this Agreement, prior to the end of its terms, by the mutual agreement of the School District and the City, or by either party giving the other sixty (60) days prior written notice of termination. 6. Duration. This agreement shall be in force and of effect upon its execution by the respective parties following authorization by Resolution of the governing bodies thereof and shall thereafter remain in full force and of effect for a period of four (4) years. It may be renewed thereafter by the mutual written agreement of the parties. 7. Binding Effect. This Agreement shall be binding upon the parties and their successors. P.ige 5 - Joint Powers (Mounds View City - Edgewood Jr. High) IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed on their behalf by their respective undersigned officers, as duly authorized by their respective governing bodies, as of the day and year first above written. CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW By Its Mayor (Corporate Seal) By is Clerk INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 621 (Corporate Seal) COPY B MOUNDS VIEW SCHOOLS COMMUNITY EDUCATION DEPARTMENT AND THE MOUNDS VIEW PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT FACILITATED USAGE OF AREA SCHOOLS TYPE OF ACTIVITY AGE GROUP SPONSOR FACILITATOR LOCATION FACILITY `. Basketball Youth 3-6 grd. M.V.Parks M.V.Parks R.O., PW. Gyms Youth 3-9 grd. IBA Assoc. M.V.Parks ✓ R.O., PW, EW. Gyms Adult M.V.Parks M.V.Parks ✓EW. Gyms Softball - Boys/ Youth M.V.Parks M,V.Parks c 4.0., PW., EW. Fields Girls - Adults Mens/Womens/CO.Rec-M,V.Parks M.V.Parks & Parks w-PW., EW. & Parks Fields T-Ball Youth K-3 grd. M.V.Parks M.V.Parks ✓If 0., PW., EW. & Fields Parks Baseball Youth Assoc. M.V.Parks ✓&WParks , R.O., Fields t' 8-Ball Youth 8 yr.Old M.V.Parks M.V.Parks `paW.rks R.0 PW & Fields Soccer Youth 3-9 grd. 6th grd.-Adult M.V.Parks M.V.Parks M.V.Parks M.V.Parks ✓ EW. ,/ EW. Fields Fields f Football - Flag Youth Assoc.)M.V. M.V.Parks ✓ EW. & Parks ✓,EW. & Parks Fields Fields Youth 4-9 grds. Assoc.)Pks. W,r$ Parks Fiel �+1?r M.V.Park� M,V, Gymnastics Youth/Adult M.V.Parks M.V.Parks ✓ EW., PW. Gyms, Swimning Youth & Adult Inst.M.V.Parks M.V.Parks [/.EW. & Beaches Pool/Lake Pool - AAU Youth & AdulL Assoc. M.Y.Parks t/ EW Hockey Youth Assoc. M.V.Parks vZEW. & Parks Rinks ;<y Wrestling Youth Assoc. M.V.Parks ✓ EW- & Iron. Gyms 1'r Volleyball Adults M.V.Parks M.V.Parks ✓ EW. Gyms Playgrounds Youth M.V.Parks M.V.Parks ✓Parks, EW., PW., Open & R.O. #' Golf Youth & Adult M.V.Parks M.V.Parks EW. & Golf Course Gyms & Course' Tennis Youth & Adult M.V.Parks M.V.Parks r✓ EW. & Parks Courts Ice Skating Youth & Adult M.V.Parks M.V.Parks Parks & EW. Rinks Scouting Youth Boy Scout Comm.Ed. R.O., PW. Classrooms Girl Scouts Campfire Early Ohildhood Youth/Adult Comm.Ed. Comm.Ed. CRC classrogms s. & Family Ed. Senior Citizens Adult sunrise Sr. M.V.Parks Church Room Room -�; Adult M.V.Park M.V.Parks Park ; :s0 TYPE OF ' RCTIVITY AGE GROUP SPONSOR FACILITATOR LOCATION FACILITY 'tee -School Story Youth E4.V.Parks M.V.Parks Park Room tmour Adult Education Adults Comm.Ed. Comm.Ed. CRC Center (ADB., GED., HSD) Bridge Adults M.V.Parks M.V.Parks t/Parks & EW. Classroom Adult Enrichment Adults Comm. Ed. Comm.Ed. ✓ EW. & Iran. Classroom Business/Language Arts/Crafts Look What's Cooking Sewing 'n Needlecraft Special Interest Outdoor Education ' Ladies Day/ Adults M.V.Parks M.V.Parks Open --------- Gadabouts ..Health Services Youth/Adult Ramsey Cty. Comm.Ed. CRC Classroom Youth Service Bureau Family Y.S.B. Comm.Ed. CRC Classroom School - Extra Youth. School School R.O., PW., EW. Curricular - Softball Youth School School t/ R.O., PW., EW. & Parks Boys/Girls - Baseball Youth School School l/ R.O., PW., EW. & Parks - Soccer Youth School School ✓ R.O., ✓ PW., EW. & Parks - Swimming Youth School School EW. - Football Youth School School w-�R.O., PW., EW. & Parks >=: - Basketball Youth School $chool R.O., PW., EW. & [c?. ron. - Volleyball Youth School School R.O., PW., EW. & Iron. _ - Skiing Youth School' School ✓ EW., Iron. & Parks - Hockey Youth School School ✓R.0., PW., EW. & Rinks Skiing (After- Youth 7-12 grd. Comm.Ed. Comm. Ed. Afton Alps Slopes School) Skiing Youth Extension Classes Adults Tap & Ballet Youth Firearms Safety Youth Cross Country Ski Youth/Adults } Youth/Adults Youth Trips Youth Badminton Adults Bridge Brigade Adults Evening Bridge Adults :.%,oidliday Crafts Adults Jazz Dahce Exercise Adults d"etbalI Adults League/Lessons M.V.Parks Anoka Ramsey Comm.Coll. M.V.Parks M.V.Parks M.V.Parks Comm.Ed. M.V.Parks M.V.Parks 14.V.Parks M.V.Parks M.V.Parks M.V.Parks M.V.Parks M.V.Parks Open Slopes Comm.Ed. t/EW. Classroom. M.V.Parks M.V. Parks M.V.Parks Comm.Ed. M.V.Parks M.V.Parks 11.V.Parks M.V.Parks M.V.Parks M.V.Parks M.V.Parks SS Park .--'Parks & EW. Irondale Open EW 4,, EW & Parks Gym Room Course Outside Open Gym Roam _3_ TYPE OF ACTIVITY AGE GROUP SPONSOR FACILITATOR LOCATION FACILITY uog Obedience Adult M.V.Parks M.V.Parks F/ EW. Gym First Aid Inst. Adults M.V.Parks M.V.Parks Parks Room Open Gym Adults M.V.Parks M.V.Parks ✓ EW. Gym Ping Pong Tournament Adults M.V.Parks M.V.Parks ,/ EW. Gym Firearms Safety Youth M.V.Parks M.V.Parks Jr.High Dances Youth M.V.Parks M.V.Parks ✓EW. Gym Kid Napers/Youth Youth M.V.Parks M.V.Parks ,/EW. Movies Youth M.V.Parks M.V.Parks Parks After School Youth Youth M.V.Parks M:V.Parks PW. & R.O. Gym Puppet Wagon Youth M.V.Parks M.V.Parks ✓R.0., PW., EW., Park & Community Storyhour Youth M.V.Parks M.V.Parks COPY C REVISED DRAFT 3/4/80 EGGEWOOD JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT REGARDING DEVELOPMENT AND USE OF INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 621 OUTSIDE FACILITIES AT EDGEWOOD JUNIOR HIGH .SCHOOL THIS AGREEMENT, made this day of , 1980 between the CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW, hereinafter referred to as the "CITY" and INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIS- TRICT NO. 621, hereinafter referred to as the "SCHOOL DISTRICT". WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the School District owns and operates Edgewood Junior High, the premises of which include certain outside facilities, said school sites delineated in red on the map attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit A, and WHEREAS, it is the mutual desire of the School District and.the City to coop- erate for the purposes of permitting said outside facilities to be used for the edu- cation and recreation activity programs of the School District and the City, and WHEREAS, the School District and the City desires to upgrade and maintain the Edge « Junk;, �y' outside ia�iities' .rsnit utilization, not y iiy' the pupils of the School District, but also by the citizens of the School District and of the City, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that in consideration of the foregoing reci- tals and mutual covenants and promises herein set forth, it is hereby agreed by and between the School District and the City as follows: 1. INSTALLATION, UPGRADING, MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR The City agrees to participate in the maintenance and development of the outside facilities at Edgewood Junior High. The City's contributions will consist of in -kind services (i.e_, grading, engineering, mowing, repairing and replacement) and/or capi- tal equipment for a total of $36,000 for the three (3) year period 1979, 1980 and 1981. Specific maintenance agreements will be developed mutually by both parties before March 15, 1980 for this three (3) year time period. The -form and amount of the City's and District's contributions starting with 1982 and thereafter will be detailed yearly in a main- tenance agreement between the City and the School District, approved by March 15 each year. !F45 Should the maintenance agreements not be mutually agreed to by March 15 as stated above or should the maintenance agreements mutually agreed to not be honored by either party, this joint powers agreement shall be jointly reviewed within ninety (90) days after March 15 or from the date the agreement was not honored. 2. EASEMENT FOR EGRESS AND INGRESS The School District -hereby grants to the City, its agents and employees, and participants in its scheduled recreational activities, programs or events, an egress and ingress to said outside facilities so long as this agreement is in effect. 3. INDEMNIFICATION a. School District's indemnification of City. The School District hereby agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the City against any and all claims for damages, of whatever nature, arising from or in consequence of the duties it has assumed hereunder and also arising from or in consequence of its operation, supervision, control or conducting of any of its recreational activities, programs or events or related activities utilizing said outside facilities. b. City's indemnification of School District. The City hereby agrees to inde; .: y and ,,pie ia�+uless the of uis.. against any and all' claims for damages of whatever nature, arising from or in consequence of the duties it has assumed hereunder and also arising from or in consequence of its operation, supervision, control or conducting of its recreational activities, programs or events or related activities utilizing said outside facilities. c. Nature and extent of indemnification. The indemnification set forth in the previous two subparagraphs of this paragraph 3 shall protect the indemnitee and its successors, from and against any and all ac- tions, proceedings, claims, demands, costs, damages and expenses, including reasonable attorneys' fees which it may pay, sustain or incur. 4. USE OF FACILITIES The School District hereby grants to the City permission and license to conduct at such times, after school hours, and on weekends, as will not interfere with regular school curricular, co -curricular and related activities, on said outside facilities, such recreational activities, programs, or events, as the City desires to conduct, to utilize the' -3- outside facilities for the optimum benegit of citizens living within the School District in general and citizens of the City in particular. To this end, the School District shall, upon execution of this agreement, furnish the Parks and Recreation Director of the City with a schedule of the dates and times on.which the School District may be utilizing the said outside facilities in connection with its regular and summer school curriculums and related activities. Use of the facility shall be governed by School District Policy #1330. 5. TERMINATION The parties may terminate this agreement by the mutual agreement of the School District and the City, or by either party giving the other ninety (90) days prior written notice of termination. 5. DURATION This agreement shall be in force and of effect upon its execution by the respective parties following authorization by resolution of the governing bodies thereof and shall remain in full force until officially terminated. 7. BINDING EFFECT This agreement shall be binding upon the parties and their successors. 4- IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this agreement to be executed on their behalf by their respective undersigned officers, as duly author- ized by their respective governing bodies, as of the day and year first above written. CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW (Corporate Seal) By Its Mayor By Its Clerk 1J uau0 i - JISTRICT NO. 621 (Corporate Seal) By Its Chairman By Its Clerk COPY D - ttr - 1/11 Wort daily usegr ' - Ilea Once/wYk1/IonCh /.. - All activities are based On ti:a rnnaaljy Proper installatism.... MOU4DS TI at SMOLS 00TSIOE FACILITIES MINICKMEE STAR7AM - "" •t ^er3ed Standard. Nalnttmncr required for satisfactory site/fetllity ule St. A►R[L MAT JWE JLM1T AUG. SE►T. OCT. M'TY. E3D1AtiR7IOM Rawtlne m l.%anaKf Area/Activity A. grass Areas for Site: _ ••xa Mama xasa Rau m•• I &,Weekly.. "lima of-b:day.CyCIO. 1. sawing xxas Aasa xs•• mjrjj� every two 2. Trim `•as xemx xxp amp sasx mama 1. Aseily par recrar.mAded doll%s0tee schedule. 3.' Waterlog b. Baseball/Saftboll Infield: 1. ••// //// ////. //// !/•' 1. Lay or Nch lNlro/tonferenu game. Drag 2. Line Playing fields ••// //// /J// IJ// //I/ !//I !/•• 2. War of each league/Confrrenee Game. G ►mtball/Setter IOfleldt: 1. Llae playing Fields ..m am xau Rama xau xaxx h 1. Chalk once/week j 2. or hint twice/month. O. Trash Rafesti 1. Pick Ile Site -XI xxxa aria axm eau seal Imam b. Once/week or as needed. 2. Once/week or as needed. taper rptaeles ••xx- mm anon xau mm mx:ui RAU .. C. Teams Courts: 1. lmspeet tlttslSta deeds ••as ama am Amax Ran xxza Axae 1. Once/week. 2. As needed. 2. 7lghtt�/Rep►Ir .. .•.• .. .. F. Tollorull torts: 1• laspeet MUMMA"" ••xx xxxx axm amm xau xxas nap 1. Once/week. .. .. ... 2. As needed. r- Site Inspection: L Total Ovenlow alas axaa am Us" mass map RAU xau 1. Once/week. . !..York Orders/Repair .. .• ! .. .. .. .. .. .. 2. At needed. seasenalJhrlodlc wlmtenante . A. grass Areas: 1. Fertilizing zz.. 1. Once/year. 2. Stedine .u. ...t z... - .. - 2.Once/year. 3. Once/ytar. 1. Peed Central • d. Aerationarm. s:.. ..xr a. Onc e/yr■e. 1. Irrigation System: org/Ronth. 1. Once/oontb. fro t. latpectlae for ttfactlree ss ..a. ..A.. ..x.. ..a. ..m. ..x. ..a. ..x. 2. lasebl anr•rldc Si zt ..- .. 1 OnceJyearlY. 1. rj'-' 2. Agllue'RegLexwart ...zz .. 2 As neede0/inspettloq/werk order. 1. 2aipacUlase Anchors ..as aaax xux mass PARR nxa xx•• 1. Meetly 0. iemns/STpsJArrlerilCwed 41U: 1. Repair ... .. _ .. .. _ .. .. 1. As aeadod/fospeetlowwork er/er. E. Tennis CDWVmLci Top Swrfaces: 1. sesvrface/Linlag 1. Five year cycle. 2. Crack "Ir - ..0 2. Annually. F. Ori.e.rys/rarking/lrail Ams: I.' llawrraeing 1 - 1. lased po/inspection/work order. 2. timing - 2. sued oWinspection1 ork order. >. Smoylawiq 1. Aft., new snowfall. G. Shrwkm: • 1. Trim S. Water .u.• _ . .. 1. Annual. 2. As mNed/lupectiom/wrt Order. M. leAches/sleachers/like Russ: 1. Repair .. .. 5 : I. As needed/Inspettianitexk ender. 2. Relocatlen,/Storage ... _.. ... ... 2. As emedad/work order. . I. Field Event flU/sel7eyb►I1 Court: 1. Sand Raplocrrnt 1. based onliatpsctice/rerk order. Repair 2. lased oNtnpection/work exrder. J. Truk: 1_ Swrfact Repair ..tz 1. Annual 2. graplae �. ..•- ..•. ...• .. ..! T. As nmmded/inipeetltn/Wrk Order.. R Water powwtain: 1. Clean ..zs 1. As neeMdlinspeetlOr3/Mrlt Order. 2. Orau 2. Annually L. Ice Surfaces: 1. Now 2. Fla" .. 3. Board Cautrvctimn/Aapair - 1Stwmge wilding: - 1. Repair t It. Lt ts/Ener.nten.rkt � mgllmnalel ...• 1. As mOehd/lmapOttiOO/uab dwM. ... ,...:.. ■iilillllr■■11111111C��::�R��illalfll�alfala�aalilf lllll!i■I11■■11!!Il■Billions if1111a111111 ■, Illlil� 1lrlll■�...... ■111181■a111aa11igt1: ■nil 1 11 nil Million 11111111■a1111111 111111 ■�iiii 1 1111111 ill!!li■■1lllll■r Isla ®11��' �■Bp11 illirrl■NAI ill ■■Irrlliiimillline 11l 1€ ■11l111 ■iilll!■■1�111 ■■Brllll lIIIt11 i®a �n '■l�Inl■■!nn ■■Inl � ■Ir11 1 poop all■�ar��: "'r'_If11111■■Itl11 Cmilli 11■i1111 1189111 .... ■�11llii■.■111111■�IIIII�■■Illlllrl llllll 11 �t1 ■■11�111■■1111li■111111■milli IINIla1111IEmu 1, ■■NI r�w■11111MINIM l■illallr■alalllllia1H HiiiiiiB■IIIIIIYmill loin 11111ara1glalla1i 111% CC1i1111CC 1 111C11111111CNilI[111011111IC 1HP, ■■111111 Ir11111111Milli III Milli ION 111111115 191;:: C■lIIIIBC 11111111■ 1111/111/ milli INI 11111111i N ■111f11■i111111 ■111111iAllrtlllalfll1111�t1t' Oi11111��■l1u11C illlall� ®arlrll Mtllall 1�tli'< ■1! Il ■11111!■■Illrll lrlllall1111611a1�1" rrwnurrr�1111111■mill 111i111111� I I111i1INN 111`: liiiiiii��iii�oi�liai�ii�ago 1ld�s��fRom f`. P ni.o L.#Af%n MAIVA COPY G y OUTSIDE FACILITIES - CAPITAL OUTLAY PROJECT UPDATE FEBRUARY 11, 1980 This report is a revision from the last report of April 3, 1979 and revised cost estimates of July 16, 1979.- COMPLETION COST/ STATUS IN PROJECT DATE ESTIMATE ORIGINAL PROPOSAL EDGEWOOD WORK COMPLETED 1. Survey & regrading of site Sept.'78 $13,133.00 Sch.Dist. Part of original proposal 2. Irrigation system installed Sept.'78 3� Top -dress & re -seed all turf Sept.'76 4. Ag-lime infields S. Purchase & installation of backstops railway 7. Purchase of playet-s benches PROJECTS TO BE COMPLETED Sept.'78 June '79 Aug. ii� 3,075.00 MoundsView 16,700.00 Sch.Dist. Part of original proposal 650.00 MoundsView 10,686.00 Sch.Dist. Part of original proposal 3,450.00 MoundsView 2,489.00 Sch.Dist. Part of original proposal 50.00 MoundsView 2,000.00 Sch.Dist. Addition to original 3,921.00 MoundsView proposal o,ZbZ.UO Sch.ojst. Part of original propose] (Additional footage) July.'79 2,256.00 1oundsView, SUB TOTAL $53,260.00 Sch.Dist. 13,402.00 MoundsView $66,662.00 - EXPENSES TO DATE 1. Installation of four lane track Est.'80 $10.000.00 Part of original proposal Installation of four lighted Est.'80 50,000.00 Part of original proposal :' tennis courts 3. Completion of field protection, Est.'80 1.700.00 Addition to original curbing, railing or fencing proposal 4. Construction of outdoor multi- ? 18,638.00 Part of original proposal purpose building SOB TOTAL $80,338.00 - Estimatod E►openays GRAND TOTAL $,147,000.00 PROJECTS REVISED ESTIMATE 7/79 -hoot District W ,unds View ESTIMATED 7179 TOTAL $1111000.00 1147,000.n0 1 MEMO TO: Mounds View Parks and Recreation Commission FROM: Staff DATE: March 25, 1980 RE: Silver View Park Update Attached is a copy of the map that has been agreed upon in concept by both the Planning Commission and City Council at their recent meetings. In addition I have enclosed the minutes from the City Planning Commission which outlines in detail the proceedings of their meeting. It appears at this time that the general framework for a land swap, grant or park dedication is now reaching the preliminary concept stage. It should be noted that the planning review we have been through during the past four weeks was strictly a preliminary concept approval for the proposed zoning and land uses as presented. The next phase of the process is to interview and hire a consultant to do the preliminary design and construction documents for the park property. Staff would once again encourage and solicit the Commissions involvement in this process and recommend the following process: 1. Staff would preliminary screen five to seven planning consultants and firms whom they feel are capable of performing the projects as outlined. Suggested firms might be: a. Inter -Design b. Saunders and Thalden Associates U. udLiier, Ringwood and Rose e. Derrick Grow and Associates f. Developmental Concepts g. Tim Erkelle and Associates Completed by April 19. 1980 2. Staff would submit a staff report recommending three firms that would be formally interviewed by the Parks and Recreation Commission. Completed by April 24, 1980 3. The Parks and Recreation Commission would then request proposals from the firms of their choice. Completed by April 24, 1980 4. Parks and Recreation Commission would make a recommendation to the City Council for their review. Completed by April 24. 1980 5. City Council enters into a contract with a planner. Completed by April 28, 1980 March 25, 1980 Page 2 1 The one major issue that is yet to be resolved in regards to the site develop- ment of Silver View centers around the final configuration of the pond. The r developer has stated that he is willing to develop the pond to a 2 - 3' level at a cost not to exceed $250,000. Staff is recommending that an additional 48,000 cubic yards of fill be removed at the developers expense. As this is a fairly complex issue staff will be presenting a verbal report with sup- porting visual material to better define the issues at hand on Thursday. The second consideration involved in the planning process to date is L.A.W.C.O.N. applications for phase 2 development are due on May 2. The impact of this issue centers around the fact that the City will be in a better position to be funded if the issue of park re -location were. finalized prior to final review which is scheduled for the first week in June. As a final note it should be remembered that construction of the pond would not commence until the winter of 1981 at the earliest which means general construc- tion of the park site will be delayed until Spring, 1981. MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION Regular Meeting P29e_2------------------------------------- ---------March 11_1�80 Chairperson Mountin noted the memo dated 3/19/80 regarding the proposed Case Review Format. She asked that the Commission consider use of the format. Haake moved to remove Item N6 from the table. Seconded 6. PRELIMINARY CONCEPT by Burmeister. 7 ayes REVIEWAL P.U.D. 0 nays Official Rose introduced the item as an additional step review requested by the Applicant and desired by the City for their proposed P.U.D. development. This step was felt to be advantageous, due to the City's development of a community park and the Applicant's interest in developing an approximate 100 acre parcel. The parcel in question and under review is basicly bounded by Long Lake Road, County Road H2, Silver Lake Road and County Road I. The City's existing zoning of the area is a combination of R-1, R-2, R-4 and 1-1. The Comprehensive Plan designates the area mixed P.U.D. to include Commercial, Public and Residential. The Applicant, In his letter to you dated 1/9/80, has pro- posed such a sketch proposal. He has also listed five points of concern which he would like the 51ty to agree E;l, o, ectiort y start his P.U.O. process. Staff recommends that you comment on his five points of concern and further, give him direction with regard to any additional specifics you might recommend be incorporated in his P.U.D. planning process. This recommendation that the Planning Commission might make does not short-circuit the three step P.U.O. process, but only becomes a vantage point for both the City and the Applicant. The vantage for the City would be to complete the park relocation swap, purchase and dedication process and for the Applicant, the direction necessary for him to start his P.U.D. process. glazer stated he felt the process was being cut short. Suggested that the Applicant start at the Concept Stage of the P.U.D. process. Official Rose assured him that there was no short cut of the P.U.D. process. Park Director Anderson gave a brief overview of his staff memo dated March 17, 1980. Mr. Anderson stated that the Parks and Recreation Commission had been studying and re- viewing the Silver View Park Issue since August, 1976. It was the consensus of the Park Commission that the re- location proposal as presented would be a benefit to both the developer and the City. Anderson further stated that the current park proposal was arrived at following 18 months of compromise and negotiation with both the Park MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION Regular Meeting Page_3-------------------------------------- _' ------------------------- March__ 1980 z-- - Commission, the Developer and City Council. Anderson 6. PRELfMINARY CONCEPT' — concluded his report by stating that the June 1, 1980 REVIEWAL P.U.D. deadline was required to consumate the land deal so (cont.) that construction could commence. Applicant was asked to comment. Dale Cremers, for the Applicant, had no comment at this time. Haake questioned how the actual land swap, purchase and dedication was to occur. Director Anderson explained the approximate acreages and the time frame it was hoped to be completed in. Fedor requested how the ownership of the pond was to occur and the value of the dedication. Director Anderson stated the ownership would be by the City and that it was hoped to be part of the preliminary concept agreement. The value of the dedication depends on the appraisal used and the land itself. Anderson referred to the appraisals the City had received. Burmeister had no questions or statements at this time. Skiba had no questions or statements at this time. Glazer had no questions or statements at this time. McCarthy statem' F Mountin asked Director Anderson where the City was with regard to the Comprehensive Plan Park process. Anderson replied that Staff and Council would be reviewing the survey in the near future. Public hearings have been scheduled. He further noted that this survey did not cover Silver View Park. That study will be done by L.A.W.C.O.N. funds and a separate issue. Dale Cremers and Dick Cush, of Kraus -Anderson, were at the meeting on behalf of the land owners. Cremers stated that he felt it would be easier and more profitable for Kraus -Anderson to develop the land under the existing zonings. Kraus -Anderson has chosen not to, due to Mounds View Staff's insistence that Kraus -Anderson use the Comprehensive Plan designation of Mixed P.U.D. He stated that Kraus -Anderson is not a residential developer but, due to the City's interest in that usage and the potential marketability of the residential use, Kraus - Anderson has decided to develop a major portion of their holdings as residential. Kraus -Anderson also supports the park relocation and acres noted in the Staff reports. He asked the Commission to give him direction from which to further his plan before he spends additional monies. 4114 In turn, he would try to accommodate these concerns as best he could. He would also like to assist in the Staff deadline timing with regard to the park land swap, MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION Regular Meeting Page-4__-____ ____ March_19i_1980 dedication and purchase so that the City might continue 6. PRELIMINARY CONCEPT with funding. Out of 100 acres of land, this proposal REVIEWAL P.U.D. gives them 56 acres. They have studied the area needs (continued) for this land and it confirmed the City's designation of mixed P.U.D. Cremers further discussed the lake development. He noted that the City's Engineer recommended the deepening of the lake an additional two feet. He agreed with this, but stated the City would then be requested to participate. They would also be willing to allow the assessing of the additional cost, of which they would, in turn, be respon- sible for another approximate 40%. Overall, he felt their proposal was a plus to the community and that was Kraus-Andersons intent and style. If the City and Kraus -Anderson completed a preliminary concept agreement, they would immediately start the agency review process formally, as well as preparing for the P.U.D. process. Haake questioned whether the City should change the depth of the pond in lieu of the recommendation from S.E.H. Rose replied that, due to the necessity of outside agency reviewal and approvals, the City might accept the blue - line drawing as presented by the Applicant's Engineer. Upon receiving the agency reviewals, the City may then be more able to determine certain aesthetic values of the pond. To clarify the issue to what extent the Applicant would develop the proposed lake, he was asked if they would develop it at no cost to the City, pursuant to the blue - line drawing sumbitted by the Kraus -Anderson engineer. Cremers, answering for the Applicant, stated they would. Fedor discussed the residential land uses, feeling they might be better defined. Burmeister questioned the height of the elderly high rise proposal, stating that there were height re- strictions In our code. Cremers stated they would stay within the City Code or request changes. He further outlined that Kraus - Anderson mainly plans office buildings above County Road I, with the commercial development along Highway 10 to possibly include a food market, furniture store, hardware, etc. Kraus -Anderson was not interested In fast food establishments because they like to build and lease buildings. MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION Regular Meeting Page-S------------------------------------------------------------------March-19j_1980 Skiba stated his concerns had been answered. 6. PRELIMINARY CONCEPT REVIEWAL P.U.D. McCarthy questioned the feasibility of the office (continued) buildings on the marginal land above County Road 1. Further, where would the existing ponded water drain to. Boxrud, of Short -Elliott -Hendrickson, stated that the area would drain to the lake and that there was capacity for the 260 acre drainage district to meet the require- ments of Resolution #983 with the Applicant's report. McCarthy further questioned the control of Kraus - Anderson over the land they might sell to another developer. Cremers stated that Kraus -Anderson would exercise the controls of the final P.U.D. approval documents. Glazer stated he could appreciate Kraus -Anderson's effort in this two years of planning, but that this was the first Planning Commission review. Glazer asked Cremers if there was a need for elderly housing in Mounds View. .remers stated he was under the belief that there was and that financing could also be obtained. Glazer further questioned whether or not we gain storage capacity comparing the existing pond with the proposed one. Boxrud stated that the City gains storage. Glazer then asked if, with the enlargement of the pond, the nutrient balance needs would stay the same. Boxrud stated that he thought there would be adequate vegetation around the perimeter of the pond but that if the DNR or RCWD wanted more, the City could just require less excavation in certain areas. Further discussion centered around the need for open space and the feeling that the proposed Take/pond met that requirement. Mountin questloned the feasibility of the swimming beach. Rose referred to S.E.H.'s report stating that there were a number of factors. The final plan for the lake and beach should be planned in the P.U.D. process. Boxrud added that an additional study may be necessary, de- pending on how the proposal is changed by outside agencies, if at all. Haake questioned the need for a beach with Spring Lake so near. The zoning of the middle 22.9 residential noted acres was asked. Cremers stated that he would be willing to go medium density. Haake felt that at this time maybe everything should be noted R-1. Council member Forslund spoke and asked that the liilo Planning Commission give the Applicant direction so that he can continue. MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION Regular Meeting Page-6---------------------------------- ___-_March_19,_1980 Fedor asked what was being done about existing 6. PRELIMINARY CONCEPT drainage ditches. Rose replied that any existing R£VIEWAL P.U.D. drainage facilities would be respected, modified (continued) or Improved, but that the system would continue to work under the criteria of Resolution N983. Burmeister asked if the swimming beach was a high priority. Anderson stated it was. She further asked Kraus -Anderson if the middle 22.9 acres could not have a mixture of R-I to R-3 uses. Cremers, for Kraus - Anderson, stated he thought the tract was too small for a good mix. Glazer asked if the pond was necessary regarding Resolu- tion #983. Boxrud stated possibly not all of it. Glazer then stated he would like to preserve the natural setting as much as possible, to protect the water as it exists. McCarthy asked what density Kraus -Anderson had planned for the southwest corner. Cremers, for Kraus -Anderson, stated single family dwellings. That they wanted to protect and preserve the rolling character. McCarthy also stressed the need for minimum access to existing arterials and the use of an interior road system. Cremers agreed that this was important and was in their plans. McCarthy asked to what extent were Kraus -Anderson's lake development plans; were they going to seed and provide bank control? Cremers said that it was mandatory by outside agencies. Chairperson Mountin asked if there were any more questions. There were none. Haake presented the following motion, seconded by Burmeister. Whereas, the City has indicated its desire that the site known as Kraus-Anderson/Miner property be used as mixed zoning, i.e., commercial, R-4, R-3, R-2 and R-l; and Whereas, the City desires to swap the park land consisting of 16.9 acres on the southwest corner to the northwest corner and to acquire an additional pur- chase of park land with L.A.W.C.O.N. funds; and Whereas, the developer will satisy Resolution No. 9� the development of Oak Park Lake; and Whereas, the developer will adhere to a ring road concept; WE MAKE THE MOTION to recommend to the Council the approval of the Preliminary Concept Proposal as presented MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION Regular Meeting tags-7 ______March-19,_1980 to us tonight, subject to the following stipulations: 6. PRELIMINARY CONCEPT REVIEWAL P.U.D. 1. The establishment of a ring road, including (continued) minimum curb cuts,with the financing of improvements decided by the Council, such as the Improvements put in by the City and assessed back to the developer via taxes. 2. That said lake would be developed as indicated on Gerald Sunde's plat dated Feb. 19, 1980, satisfying Resolution N983 and to satisfy specifications from the regulating bodies. 3. That an acceptable cost be arrived at in the development of the lake and an agreement as to the maintenance of the lake. 4. That a land swap is undertaken for park purposes, relocating the present 16.9 acres in the south- west corner to the northwest corner, plus the addition of acreage from L.A.W.C.O.N. funds in the same site area. 5. That the proposed zoning of the southwest corner be R-1 and the 22.3 acres be mixed residential. 6. That the land located north of County Road I owned by Kraus -Anderson be fully approved by all regulating agencies with guarantees that all drainage will be controlled before any develop- ment takes place on said parcel. Discussion then occurred about the development of the lake. Cremers was asked if the proposed plan of the lake was required to be modified, would he agree to have it done at no additional cost to the City. Cremers agreed, as long as it did not change the number of cubic yards of materials to be dug. Fedor asked what density the developer would agree to with regard to the 22.9 acres. Cremers stated 4 units per acre of developable land. Mountin stated she felt that definite density should be part of the P.U.D. process. She also would like to see the DNR and RCWD recommendations at the General Concept Stage. Mountin offered amendments to the main motion, seconded by Burmeister. r MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION Regular Meeting P29eA------------------------------------------------------------------Harch_1�s 1�80 To add the following: 7, The developer shall submit DNR and RCWD reviewals and recommendations to the Planning Commission at their General Con- cept Stage. 8. The Developer, upon completion of the lake, shall dedicate it and the walkway, properties to the City. 9. That the park land "swap, dedication and purchase" occurs before June 1st. 10. That the developer submit information necessary for the EAW at the General Concept Stage of the P.U.D. process. Glazer questioned the need for specific densities. Motion to amend main motion by Glazer, seconded by Fedor. To modify M5 of main motion to read as follows: 5. That the proposed zoning for the parcel will be roughly as presented to us to- night, with the southwest corner being R-1 and the middle residential designated area will have no greater density than 4 units per acre of its developable land. The 3.0 acre area designated elderly mid - rise will still be open to discussion. Vote on second amendment. 5 ayes 2 nays Burmeister voted nay because she wanted to con- sider the densities at the Concept Stage. Mountin agreed with that and also stated the City did not have a zero lot line ordinance which could affect those densities. Vote on first amendment. 7 ayes 0 nays Vote on main motion. 6 ayes 1 abstain 6. PRELIMINARY CONCEPT REVIEWAL P.U.D. (continued) MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION Regular Meeting Page-9 ------------------------------------------------------------------ March 121 1980 Glazer abstained because he felt there was not 6. PRELIMINARY CONCEPT enough information about the pond. He would REVIEWAL P.U.D. like to have DNR and RCWD reports. He felt (continued) strongly about losing the natural drainage setting unless it was proved to be necessary. Rose reported that the applicant, John Miller, requested 7. MILLER INDUSTRIAL the Planning Commissions input with regard to his PLAT - Sketch plan sketch plan. The general location of his parcel is reviewal - Major north of New Trunk Highway 10 and south of County Road J. Subdivision (2 lots The existing zoning is a combination of R-1, B-2 and into 14) - Rezoning 1-1. The Comprehensive Plan had denoted the area (R-•I to B-3 6 1-4, Light Industrial. He further noted that the Judicial 1-1 to B-3) Ditch #1 flowed through the property and that the RCWD's initial review indicated development could occur above the 899.0 elevation. Rose added that, the RCWD was, however, reviewing that elevation for potential change. The access proposed was a simple loop in and out. MnDOT Is presently reviewing this with their plans for new Trunk Highway 10. The soils, as noted in earlier reports, Indicated limitations. Miller, applicant for subdivision and rezoning, intro- duced himself and just asked that the Planning Commission offer any direction they could which would help him plan for the development of his plat. He required or requested no motion. Haake asked what specifically Miller has planned for uses. Miller stated he had nothing definite but that he would stay within the limits of the zonings requested. Fedor wanted to see further review by the DNR and RCWD. Burmeister wanted to hear MnDOT's comments with regard to how this fits into the relocation process. Miller stated that he would modify to meet their recommendations. Glazer also wanted to see further review by DNR and RCWD. McCarthy discussed the soils and their limitations. Gary Comstock, engineer for Miller, requested that the Planning Commission offer direction to Miller with regard to the sketch plan. l PARK Z&15 A&, 40'( QK MMUM FfIrikAT-Y A- tjT117.,,y A&KC- 17,.4,9 fl-i 11!71QGG FAMILY A(J. 111.60 AC,. IfW.I-VPa* LAN& '�&OTLAMP OMFN AfAfIMMT,47 jo.* fAPQL *.i# A&. WG64096 LA" MEMO TO: Mo View Parks and Recreation Commissioners FROM. Staff DATE: March 1980 RE: Planning Update Staff has been working closely with Mr. Gary Tushie during the past week to final- ize the preliminary concept plans for each of our neighborhood parks. Because of the delay in getting the aerial photos from Mark Hurd (recieved them Friday, March 21, 1980) we will not be prepared to discuss the blob studies at Thursday's meeting. Staff has spoken with the City Council and would recommend that a joint meeting be held with them at 6:30 p.m. on Monday, April 7, 1980. In addition staff would recommend that the Park Commission schedule a special meeting on Thursday, April 3, 1980 to review the plans with Gary Tushie prior to Monday's meeting. Staff acknowledge that Thursday, April 3, 1980 is Maundy Thursday and would welcome an alternate proposal or suggestion. The plans would be available for review for a Wednesday, April 2 meeting at the earliest. Please review your schedules prior to Thursday so that a mutually agreeable schedule can be attained. MEMO TO: Mbun s and Recreation Commissioners FROM: Sta DATE: March 1980 RE: Satellite facilities In response to the questions raised by the Commission at the February 28, 1980 Commission meeting, staff developed a survey which was sent to the surrounding communities. The communities that were contacted were: a. Maple Grove f. Maplewood b. Arden Hills g. New Brighton c. Roseville h. Shoreview d. Fridley i. Golden Valley 3. Spring Lake Park j. Robbinsdale The results of the survey were as follows: 61� r, 1. Eight out of the ten communities surveyed do provide bathroom facilities for summer athletic programs. The facilities provided ranged fro a ms at all sites to bathrooms for adult programs only.��i oreview only provides satellites wherever there are summer playground activities. 2. Many of the communities surveyed had permanent bathroom facilities rather than satellites or portable facilities. A breakdown of the types of facilities provided is as follows: Community Permanent Satellites Maple Grove 3 1 Arden Hills 1 0 Roseville 9 6 Fridley 2 12 Spring Lake Park 2 8 Maplewood 2 (open days only) 8 New Brighton 4 (2 adult, 2 youth) 4 Robbinsdale 6 (closed due to vandalism) 0 Shoreview 0 5 Golden Valley 12 3 3. In response to questions on vandalism the following was determined: a. Maple Grove, Golden Valley and Arden Hills have attendants present at all times when their permane4cilities are 1,2& open. b. Roseville leaves their facilM S open year ro.� end has experienced tremendous vandalism pr bl ® 19 The ;lbl i f outs i de n F stolen and one bldwn u�g��++i Ida e bomb} is t 9' er. Many of Many of the conmunitieNs il.that they had al 0 hat problem by staking all four cornersAl ellite is w o o. d. Robbinsdale has closed thei nt facil ecause of the vandalism problems and the baseball as i on n es portable facilities. 4. Regarding the length of season that satellites or bathrooms are available to the public the following breakdown was determined: March 25, 1980 Page 2 Month Number of Communities April 1 May 8 June 9 July 9 August 8 September 3 October 3 5. In response to cost for providing portable facilities, the current rate is $63.00 per month plus a one time charge of $24.00 for pick up and delivery. Insurance options are also available at $5.00 per unit per month. The cost for vault type toilets range from a low of $5,000. up to $15,000. I have enclosed some promotional literature on two popular waterless systems. Staff would recommend that satellite facilities be installed at the following park sites: b. Hillview c. Lambert e. Oakwood f. Groveland g. Edgewood h. Pinewood J. Red Oak The units should be installed from May 15 - August 15 which is our peak period of usage by the summer athletic programs. The cost for providing facilities would be $1,701. for the three month rental charge, $216. for pick up and delivery and $135. for insurance premiums making a total of $2,052. It is staffs intention that the $2,000. expenditure is justifiable due to the great number of usage our parks acquire during this time period. As the City Council will need to approximate additional monies for this project, the Park Commission would need to make a formal recommendation for the Council's review at the April 14, 1980 meeting. T-r , ha: would iil JdS issue feel free to give me a call at 784-3055, ext. #41. is 0 4t 2W air hn jio 19 AP- 4-:4 flaw" rcrAff uPER SgCLtii Eutt—n'&TJK i'STWIMS Before you purchase a comfort station, you should know exactly what you are getting... and what you are nol getting. Every Standard, High- way, and fairway Series Super Secur Comfort Station Is sold with the same "package" of st ind- ard equipment. This "package" does not include labor, and it does not include any frills. It does include all the basic items, all of it the finest quality obtainable. The purchaser may specify any amount of optional equipment, but the basic "package" has all the components (except for slab and rough plumbing) needed fora complete, vandal.resistant, low -maintenance, sanitary Super Secur Comfort Station. The basis dupe Secur Comfort Station "Package" DOES Include: ■ The engineered, lactM-fabricated steel comfort station building, knocked down. • Unbreakable aluminum plumbing fixtures, Epoxiglaze'"-coated in white. • Toilet stall partitions with doors. • Tissue dispensers, surface •mounled or conrealed. • Stainless Steel one-piece mirror for each lavatory, ■ Cast aluminum "MEN" and "WOMEN" signs, ■ Flush valves, complete with vacuum breaker and angle stop. . Filler valves for lavatories. ■ Security fasteners for fixtures and mirrors. ■ Anchor bolts for foundation. . Sleeve ligs for fixture openings in foundation. • Typical foundation drawings. + Erection drawings. ■ List of required tools. ■ All necessary nuts, bolts, and miscellaneous hardware. The basic Super Secur Comfort Station "Package" DOES NOT Include: -. rele foundatic.ri {;• w LreCtkon of the Steel Comlott Station budding. ■ Rough plumbing Installation and material, including floor drains. ■ Plumbing fixture Installation. ■ Stall partition Installation. ■ Priming and finish painting, ■ Heating and electrical Installation and material. ■ Shingles, shakes, wood raiders or plyscord for gable -roof buildings. ■ Sliding aluminum sash Is available In Ileu of wire mesh screen at additional cost. Glazing is %" Plexiglas"r, Lexarl or equal with aluminum Insect screens over vents. • Partition doors on man's side, and urinal screens. + Entrance doors to rest rooms, keyed alike. Door closers available. + Well mounted vandal-rasistant lights. • Gable roof, water tight, 3- standing seam, metal -dock with seams 16" on center. REQUEST A COMPLETS SROCMUiid PROM: NE :C�111�T ST�T'1 Bob Klein, Dist. Mgr. MIRACLE•JAMISON RECREATION EQUIP. e; C.■rnrht 1977 S.■.1 SKYI War/NiC. 2400 W esl V ie- Dr. 612 • 431 4525 - Hostings, Mo. 55033 SPECIFICATIONS FOR SARMAX WATERLESS FLUSHING TOILET SYSTEM: (1) Fixtures (1, 2, 3, or 4 per system) Toilets -- vitreous china siphon jet, Teflon -coated bowls, bottom or rear discharge. Flush tanks — close coupled, vitreous china or remote stainless steel. Urinals — Wall mounted, vitreous china, washout action. (2) Controls (One per system) Individual conliol in a steel box for each system. low voitagu control s/stern. counter in each box records flushes; level indicator in each box shows accumulated waste level is approac:Ang pump - down level. automatic shutdown prevents flushing it lank is full. (3) Purification Unit (One cannister and one iodine dispenser oer fixture). Stainless steel 9" dr:L x 24" high cannister with charco;.1 filtration. Quick diticnnnect fittings: each unit good for 10.000 uses. service exchange only. return dispensers, and c.,aausters for shop recharging. (41 Storage/Separating Tank 500 gallon or 1,100 g:nllon unable waste cnpauty. ll,mil•-r( + trbergl tss co;tstraction with sump draw tube and 3" quick coupling istandnrd pump -down horn '�thng) Additional information: Pumps and Motors: Located outside storage/separating tank in component section; the pump is self - priming and close coupled: constant pressure; quick disconnect line fittings; motor is 120 volts, 8.83 amps, 3b hp, drip proof. SARMAX Fluid: Non -toxic, petroleum base, waterlike color, no unpleasant odor, flash point 225* F, pour point -- 40° F; sp. gray. approximately .8 InstaflPtinr nn f 4nnr - " •r,a1 plumbing nn-' -' nr +r^^f—Wsb, actor. Use a liaHoperator for pump -down aiiu cannister exchange. IyAI EHLESS FULL Fr JSH TOILE IS E240BOB KLEIN & ASSOCIATES Park i Playground Equipment 0 Westview Dr. 612 - 437-4525 Hastings, Mn. 55033 SARMAX WATERLESS FLUSHING TO -LET SYSTEM A conventional -appearing toilet receives the waste material which is flushed away utilizing proprietary SARMAX fluid. The material enters a separation and storage tank capable of handling up to four toilet fixtures. The waste material rapidly settles out, leaving the SARMAX fluid on top. With each flush, the fluid is recovered and returned to the toilet tank thrOUgh a pur- ification unit- This SARMAX fluid recycling goes on until the storage tank is filled with waste and must be emptied — after about 16.500 flushes for an 1.100 Mallon tank. The SARMAX system can operate in severe temperature conditions. The system is easily serviced, utilizing cannisteis and nuick connect :tnr.i disconnect components- Recycling non -aqueous fluid operates in jt closed -loop circuit providing on -site handling of human waste with zero discharge into the environment. SARMAX flushincl fluid is more hygienic than flush water, containing properties that arrest hacterial growth. I N01 ii. ',i a; I r^ i L •.. SARMAX SOLVES THESE PROBLEMS No water or limited water at life. Conventional sanitation unavailable. Prohibition of septic tanks or soil qualities Which limit size of disposal beds. Inadequate land for septic tank and dis- posal system. Failure of septic tanks or disposal beds - Overloading of sewers and treatment plants. Sewer or treatment plant moratoriums. Stringent effluent standards. SARMAX -- PUBLIC APPLICATIONS The SARMAX is operating successfully in national forests, national parks, ski resort areas and state highway rest stops Other applications include: Picnic areas and campgrounds ka Construction siles Guard stations Fire stations « teaches Camps Dams V. Mines a Military installations Utility service buildings zo Sporls arenas and staduims 4 Fairgrounds and amusement c Offices, factories, stores, parks restaurants, motels 1543 MEMO TO: Parks and Recreation is io r FROM: Bruce K. Anderson, Di r DATE: March 26, 1980 / RE: Monthly Update, March, 1980 The purpose of this report is to keep the Parks and Recreation Commission informed on current issues within the Parks, Recreation and Forestry Department that don't need official Commission action. Mounds View A reciation Dinner - The Mounds View Appreciation D nner is slated for Saturday, March 29, 1980, beginning with cocktails at 5:30 PM at the Bel Rae Ballroom. The cost for tickets is $8.00/person and they can be purchased up until Friday, March 28, 1980, at Mounds View City Hall. Student Intern - Jeff Stottlemyer has successfully completed his internship with the City of Mounds View with plans to graduate in May of this year. Staff is now working out the final details for bringing in a new intern for this coming summer from the University of Wisconsin - LaCrosse. Colleen Wilson will be graduating this summer with a B.A. degree in Parks and Recreation Administration. Colleen's emphasis is in municipal recreation and she is interested in developing additional programming skills. Her main responsibility will be with Mary and coordinating the summer recreation programs. Festival in the Park - The irate tox the 1980 F'estava•1. alp uie Park has been c anged to Sunday, July 20, 1980, as the Ramsey County showmobile was not available on July 13. Mary has been working very closely with the Festivities Commission and I have enclosed a list of programs we have proposed to run. Frisbee Golf - We purchased ($225.00) a new frisbee golf hole that will be used at each of our summer playground sites, as well as at the Festival in the Park. Staff will be giving a brief demonstration on Thursday. After School Pro ram a Success - The after school program that we presented in conceptual form last month is now successfully drawing to a close. All eight sessions were run as scheduled with over 175 children currently enrolled. Wood Pile Survey - City Forester Jack Shields has been out actively checking woodpiles since March 1, 1980. Jack is mainly concerned with diseased elm and oak as it must be de -barked from March 1 - July 1 of each year. Staff is convinced that our rigorous enforcement program has been the major factor in the reduction of our elm and oak trees in the City. BKA/ea 7 Cif, of vordgV4 I(Ary1Sf Y ('.OUN TY. mm NE50IA 2401 HIGHWAY 10 _.--.- MOUNDS VIEW, MINN 55112 DEPARTMENT OF PARKS, 78470b5 R[CRE ATION AND FURES1 �I MEMO TO. Cotieen WiiAon, Student Intehrt FROM: Matey Kvatheim, Phogham SupeAvi6o2 DATE: Mahch 17, 1980 RE: SummeA In,tennehi.p The 6oZtowing memo outtineb your ovehatf goae and goat objectives Son your inteAnh.ip with Mound6 View PaAks, RecAeation 9 FohestAy Department a6 devel- oped between you and 1 duA.ing out MaAeh 14, 1980 meeting. Goat: To eetabWh a well -hounded 6ieed work expen.ience in .the AecAeation and parks pAo6es6ion concentita.tring especi.aCCy on the many 6aeeta o6 PaAks and ReeAeation admi.nistAateon. objectivc _(:in afw LU .. .;: i- - r<o deveCopment A. Attend the Parke and ReeAeation Commission meeti.ng67scheduled to be held: Thuuday, May 22 • Thauday, June 26 • Thunaday, July 24 • Give a upoAt on pugAam .involvement at the June and Juty meetings. B. Accompany the Di4ectot to on -site parks devetopment pwject6 .in an attempt to 6otlow and assess pAoject accompt shment6, pRobtema, and Reason 6o,% planning and devetopment deeibcon. C. A6s.iat .the Vi4ectoA ,in any 1xuk6 devetopment wank a6 teque6ted. II. Objective - PaAttie.ipate .in the many duties o6 phovid.ing a comphehenive community keakeat.ion ptogAam. A. Pah_ticipate .in the h,iA.ing o6 raft activities phogRam pan-t-time sta66• B. Keep 6,inancial budget tecotda o6 the awfineA got6 and tennis c£asse6. C. SupeAvcse ,the aummeA got6 and tennis p2oghama: 1) handle 4ta66 time -sheets 2) handle paa.ticipant cWs tiets 31 handle 6ac i.l i ty peAmi U 4) handle paui.c.ipant evaluation 51 handle tn6ttuctoA tvatuations 61 handle equipment need6 11 othex nec"Aw y duties III. Objective - PAovide. a summea ptaygnound 6ta66 tAa.ining workshop MaAeh 17, 1980 Page 2 A. Attend .the votunteeAt coaches wonkehop SatuAday, May 11 and a6si6t .the PAogAam Supehviaoft and youth Athtetie V-utectoA as Requested. B. Attend .the M.R.P.A. Ptaygiound Leadeuh.ip Wonhahop June 13. C. Ptan and implement the aummen ptayghound teadeh thaining woAkshop, June 14, with the aai.atanee o6 .the PA(,gAam Supehv<,aoA. iv. Objective - CooAdinate the Summer peayg.tound Special 7nip4 pAogAam. A. ContAaet bua seAvice.s B. Con6tAm tA.ip date¢, times and ccata with agencies. C. Novide inAoAmati.on Sot the leadeu. V. PAovide eeaes tuts 6o4 teadeas. E. Otheh necesaaAy duties. V. Objective - Attend the Mid -Seaton Adult Athtetics ManageAz meeting and aae.i.et the PAogAam SupenviAOt as )tequeeted. VI. Objective - Ptan and .implement a Speeiat Event 6oA .the poot phognam. A. Meet with .the swim 6ta66 and exprain .the pAognam. B. Vetegate duties to ata66. C. PAovide 6tym , equipment, awards and others. V. Pubt.ieize and evatuate the pnogrtam. Objective - Fatf A. Send out a bid epeci.6icatiOn bon bzochune printing aexvieee. B. Aeeiet in the ptanning o 6 Faf l activiti.es . C. Aaai.at in the tay-out od the bAoehwte. V. Ass.t.st in the mailing pucess o6 the bAochau . VIIi. Objective - Vevetop an ovehview 06 the geneAal day to day opeAationA o6 a municipat PaU a and Reateat,i.on Vepantment. A. WoAk 6oA a minimum o6 one dull day with the city Park maintenance eAew and the Community Education Vepa+.tment. B. Attend the 6ottowing meetings on a Aegulak basis: PaAka and Reeneation Commi4aion, Community Education AdviaoAy Council, M.R.P.A. Recheation Section meetings, SenioA AdvisoAy meetings, Suwi"e Seniou meetings, Festivity Commies.i.on meetings and otheu . cc. Brtuee K. Andmon, ViAectvA, Parks, RecAeatien S FonestAy MR. Rood VA. HaA.tman VA. Otto GAMES PACKET Enjoy the challenge of controlling the flight of the flying saucer. The Saucer Golf Games Packet has been designed to develop both fundamental and advanced skills. • SAUCER STRAIGHT PITCH • SAUCER CURVE PITCH • SAUCER SPIRAL PITCH • SAUCER CIRCLE PITCH • SAUCER GAME • SAUCER BASKETS SAUCER GOLF RULES The games are rated according to difficulty with * being the easiest and * * * *Ihe most difficult. Saucer Game Each player starts the game with 6 letters that spell Ihe word S-A U C E-R. A letter is taken away each time a player does not complete the Saucer Golf hole from Ihe exact location of an opponent's completed throw. Completing the Saucer Golf hole means thv: the saucer has come to rest in the basket. A player is eliminated from the game when all 61etters have been taken away. Throwing Order - A player continues Io choose the throwing location as long as the hole is completed in one throw. The right to choose throwing location is lost when an incomplete throw is made. Flip a saucer to see who chooses the first throwing location. ,v • • r Variation - The grip and delivery style and throwing location of an opponent's completed throw must be duplicated or a letter is lost. SAUCER GOLF, INC. 7533 Weshrngton Ave So. Mlnneepohs. MN 55435 Phone 6121941-2044 M Meter Saucer Straight Pitch Starting al position 1 and continuing consecu lively to position 10, each player makes 10throws. 1 throw at each position. SCORING —A point is scored when the saucer comes to rest in the basket of the Saucer Golf hole. Maximum score is 10 points or 1 point per position. High score wins. Par is 5 points. VARIATION —Play the basic Straight Pitch game with a different scoring system. Points are awarded according to throwing position number. For example, scoring throws (see definition above) from position 8 (8 points) and position 616 points) and position 2 (2 points) and misses at all the other positions would result in a score of 8 + 6 + 2 = 16. Maximum score is 55 points. Par is 15 points. iM 9aA JM /M m SM m aft wow ►OSRIDN 1 f a a a a r a a 10 Saucer Spiral Pitch oNDooRs1 ,r (OUTDOORS) ISM-1W I rM - 716• w Saucer Curve Pitch Place an obstacle, at least 1.5metershigh, between the hole and the th -wing position, 1 meter from the hole. Each pi,: er makes 4 throws per turn and 4 turns per found. SCORING —in the following manner. - 5 points saucer comes to rest in the basket of the Saucer Golf hole- - 3 points - saucer hits the upper or lower cone or the top dome. l point - saucer hits the pole - Maximum score is 80 points. Par is 40 points. VARIATION —Change the placement of the obstacle by moving it further from the hole on increments of 1 meter. BEGINNER low ISM INTERMEDIATE .__ ADVANCED Saucer Circle Pitch * * At There are six throwing posit ions located around the Saucer Golf hole. Start- ing at position 1 and continuing consecutively to position 6, each player makes 2 throws at each position using the delivery style listed. SCORING —Use the 5 - 3 - I System described above in the Curve Pitcr game. Maximum score is 60 points. Par is 30 points. lull DIAMETER ISM RADIUS oVd11MND _ BACRMMIO I wRlar This game is Straight filch in a slightly V// (oecially challenging VARIATION— Ik/ outdoors when the wind is blowing. Refer to Charge the distance a • the Straight Pilch game for scoringandvari- between the hole and ation. I the throwing positiun, Saucer Baskets IN Meter r GOAL AREA OM DIAMETER out OF BOUND& IN NOUNDs CENTER OR C /REE THROW LINE � � � HALF COURT LINE r e101 LINE PLAYERS 5 members per team. TIME Two 20 minute halts, run- ning time. Times outs after every score, out of bounds and foul. The clock s' iris up again (time in) when the saucer comes back into the field of play. Two 60 second time outs per team per half. OBJECT ......... Score points by throwing the saucer and having it come to rest in the basket of the Saucer Golf Hole. Highest score wins. SCORING ....... 2 points are scored on throws from the field or court. 1 point is scored for each free throw made. PLAY ............ The 119G Frisbee disc is the official size and weight saucer to be used. Choice of either throw -off or defending a hole is determined by a flip of the saucer. 'reams switch ends to start the second half and the team that received the first hail throw off starts the second halt by throwing off. The play starts with both teams on opposite end lines. One team throws the saucer at the Saucer Golf Hale, starting the time clock, and play continues until a time out occurs. After each score from the field and the second throw, if made, of a two free throw foul, the learn scored against starts play again by throwing the saucer over their defensive end line. Out of bounds throws are brought back into theffeldof play at the point where the saucer left the field of play. RI IL -ES ........... A) Catching: Players may catch the saucer with one or Iwo hands or by trapping it against the body. No catch is ruled if the saucer is touching the ground and complete control or possession is not present. B) Throwing. The saucer may be thi own in any direction with the following restrictions: 1. Legal Flights: single skip and all other types of flights that do not touch the ground. 2. illegal Flights: any flights other than single skip that corn in contact with the ground. C) Change of Possession: The saucer will automatically change possession under the following conditions: 1. Incomplete throw: an illegal throw (see rule B.2.), a dropped throw between teammates, an out of bounds throw, a throw intercepted by the opposition will result in a change of possession at the point where the throw was incomplete. 2. 3 Step: the player in possession of the saucer may take up to 3 steps before having to stop and establish a pivot foot. Once the pivot foot is established additional steps are not permitted and a change of possession will occur if the pivot foot moves an additional step. 3. Out of Bounds: a throw that lands out of bounds or a player in possession of the saucer having one foot on or outside the out of bounds line will result in a change of possession. 4. Goal Area: an offensive player(s) in the offivivive goal area will result in a change of possession. 5. Half Coed Line: the team in possession of the saucer has 10 seconds to move the saucer past the center line and into the offensive zone, and the saucer must be kept in the offensive zone or a change of possession will occur. 0) Fonhr: a foul by either team will result in a free throw(s) being taken. Fouls are called for the following reasons: 1.BuayCutiifioica::: IwuuUalenl,oily, niW,tn(anyly;., echai . free throws will be awarded the fouled player. 2.Goal Area: a defensive player is allowed in the defensive goal area only if the flying saucer has come to rest on the ground. A one throw free throw will be awarded when a defensive player enters the defensive goal area and the saucer has not come to rest in the goal area. E) Free Thrown: a free throw is awarded when a foul occurs. Play stops immediately (time out) when a foul is called. The free throw is taken from behind the center court line and all players, except the thrower, line up on the end line where the free throw is being made. Players will line up on the end bne in an alternate way, that is there will be a player from team A, a player from team B, a player from team A, a player from team B, etc. The saucer is not in play after the first of a two free throw series. If the free throw is not made the saucer belongs to the first player to gain possession after the miss. The saucer must leave the hand of the player making the free throw before players on the end line can mow. F) Simdtaneoos Possession: In the event of simultaneous possession by opposing player, the saucer will be awarded to the offensive team. QAUC'Fjt GOLF, INC. 1133 WA5.11G ION Aof So SAUCER GOLF RULES OBJECT OF GAME ........... Saucer Golf is modeled after the game of ball golf. The object of SaucerGolf is to complete the course in as few throws as possible. Count one point each time a penalty is assessed and each time the flying saucer is thrown. TEE THROWS ................. When starting play on a Saucer Golf hole the player must release the saucer between, behind, and not more than 2 meters behind the starting markers. A penalty is assessed if the throw is not made within the boundaries described. PLnm TMOWS ............... When throwing the saucer within 8 meters of the Saucer Golf hose the player must have one foot (plant -foot) resting on the location where the previous throw came to rest while placing the other foot no closer than the plant foot. The player is not permitted, under penalty of one point, to move either foot closer to the hole until the saucer hits or goes beyond the hole. ALL OTHER THROWS ........ The player must establish foot placement per the putting rule, but, the feet can move closer to the hole after release of the saucer. UiNPL AYABL.E LIE ............ A saucer resting more than 1 meter above the ground is ruled unpiayable and a penalty assessed. After an unplayabie lie is ruktd, the player establishes the plant foot on the ground directly beneath where the unpiayable lie occurred. NOTE: A saucer resting less than one metes above the ground is playable and the plant foot must rest at the point where the previous throw came to rest. OUT OF BOUNDS ............ Public roads, private property, and water hazards (except casual water) are k HAZARDS are out of bounds and a penalty is assessed when a saucer comes to rest in the out of bounds area. The saucer is brought back into play where it first went out of bounds. ETIQUETTE ................... The player farthest from the Saucer Golf hole always throws first In a group, regardless of score. Do not disturb other players when they are throwing. Do not throw until the players around you are out of range. Yell "FORE" if your throw is going to come now or hit another player. LOCAL RULES . Local conditions may enlarge the scope of the out of bounds and hazards � Pule as well as other aspeclr of play ias should be posted at the first tee. AetLa,L(es bon "Feativat .in the Pa)tk' Sunday, July 13, 7980 1) Baseball Exhibition Games (Youth, Parents) all afternoon 2) Croquet Tournament (Seniors) all afternoon 3) Horseshoe Tournament (Adult) all afternoon 4) Volleyball Tournament (Adult, Teens) all afternoon 5) Races & Relays (Youth) 1:00 p.m. 6) Penny Scramble (Tots) 2:00 p.m. 7) Puppet Wagon (Tots, Youth) 2:15 p.m. 8) Pie -eating Contest (Youth) 5:00 p.m. 9) Disc Frizbee Activity (Adult, Youth) all afternoon 10) Bicycle Rodeo (Youth) 12:00 noon 11) Bocce Ball (Adult, Seniors) all afternoon 12) Hoola stoop Contest (Youth, Teena) 2:30 13) Jr. Frizbee Contest (Youth, Teens) 3:00 14) Yo-Yolympics (Youth,Teens) 3:30 15) Costume Contest (Tots, Youth) 4:00 I6) Stuffed Animal Show (Tots, Youth) 4:30 PO fmour A FAef Palk S RecAeation Depan,tment P-LUt eecune: 1) T-Shirts 2) Popcorn Supplies 3) Bingo Cards 4) Satelites 5) Flyers & Brochure Article & New Brighton Rulletin Articles Suggested Performers: 1) Storytalers 2) Duck Soup cif of vourdgview May 1, 1980 Dear Parks and Recreation Commissioners: gFPAItT h14 NT nlPARKS, R[r.RpATIUN AND FORESTRY RAMSEY COUNTY, MIN NESOTA 2401 HIGHWAY 10 MU V NDS V I f W, MINN, 55112 784-3055 Enclosed is your packet of information for the May 1, 1980 Parks and Recreation Commission meeting. The major issue that we have before us this evening is the development and upgrading of the Edgewood Jr. High School/Park Site. It is staffs desire to bring this issue before the City Council at their regularly scheduled May 12, 1980 meeting. In addition it should be noted that the City Council has appointed Myself as the Acting City Administrator during the interim between the hiring of a new administrator. My reason for making note of this is that the "double duty" may necessitate an occassional late packet or delayed memo to the Park Commission. I would appreciate your understanding and patience on these items if if should become a problem, but hopefully it will be the exception rather than the rule. S � Bruce K. Anderson, Dir ctor Parks, R creation an Forestry 8KA/sw Enclosure City of Mounds View Parks and Recreation Commission Thursday, February 28, 1980 "Z 6:30 p.m. Mounds View City Hall Council Chambers 2401 Highway 10 Mounds View, MN 55112 A G E N D A w Call to Order w Roll Call Approval of the January 25, 1980 minutes Chairman's Report Councilmember's Report �isitor Presentation official swearing in process - City Administrator Nelson •� C prehensive Parks and Open Space Plan update Gary Tushie, Planning Consultant - Saunders and Thalden Inc. Preliminary Survey tabulation - Director Anderson Maintenance standards After School Programs Winter Skating Program evaluation o Staff Report 13. Adjournment * Denotes items that will need official Commission action MEMO TO: Mounds View Parks pd_Recreation ssioners FROM: Bruce K. Anderson, Direc 1`a o %iiecreation and Forestry Department DATE: February 27, 1980 RE: Parks and Open Space Update As you are aware, The City of Mounds View has entered into a planning contract with the firm of Saunders and Thalden, Inc. to develop a Comprehensive Parks and Open Space Study. Staff has presently been meeting with Mr. Cary Tushie, Planning Associate for Saunders and Thalden, on a weekly basis to review the firm's progress to date and to provide input and direction on future phases. The initial timeline for the project and our progress to date is as follows: 1. Begin inventory of existing recreational facilities - November 15, 1979 - Completed in full, 2. Begin analysis of ten neighborhood parks - November 15, 1979 - Completed in full. 3. Begin update and summary of 1970 Brauer Park Inventory Report - November 19, 1979 - Completed in full. 4. Complete inventory of existing recreational facilities - December 20, 1979 - Completed in full. 5. Begin development of a community survey - December 21, 1979 - Completed in full. 6. Complete analysis of ten neighborhood parks - December 31, 1979 - Completed in full. 7. Begin development of park master plans - January 1, 1980 - This process is underway. 8. Complete preparation of community survey and make available for dis- tribution - January 1, 1980 - Completed in full. 9. Receive and collate results for survey - January 20, 1980 - Surveys were delivered February 16, 1980 and we are in the process of tabulating them. 10. Meeting with the Park Commission to present status of project - January 20, 1980 - Completed January 24, 1980. 11. Begin cost estimates for each neighborhood park - February 12, 1980 - Not completed. 12. Complete development of park master plans - February 17, 1980 - Not completed. 13. Complete cost estimates of each neighborhood park - February 19, 1980 - Not completed. �b ' Page 2 February 27, 1980 14. Meeting with Park Commission to discuss progress of project - Master Plans - February 28, 1980 - This meeting is scheduled. oo,j:-fi 15. Submit 35 copies of final comprehensive plan update to Park Commission - March 13, 1980 - Not started yei. In general, we are staying relatively close to our predetermined schedule. The major stumbling block we have experienced is the lack of contour maps showing the City's existing facilities. The City Council approved the Mark Hurd Aerial Survey Contract on Monday, February 11, 1980, which will enable us to continue as outlined; only I would project that we will be running approximately one month behind our initial schedule. Staff is now immersed in the survey process, which was commenced February 16, 1980. The process staff has adhered to is as follows: I. February 16, 1980 - Door to door disLribution of park surveys to area residents. 2. February 19, 20, and 21 - Door to door collection of surveys by area residents. 3. March 1, 1980 - Deadline for all surveys to be returned. 4. March 4-110 - Tabulation and final analysis of survey by Saunders and Thalden Associates, Inc. Mr. Gary Tushie, Associate, Saunders and Thalden will be on hand at the February 28, 1980 meeting to bring the Commission up to date on the details of our progress to date. I have enclosed copies of the survey and envelopes for your personal records. In addition staff will provide the Commission with a brief update as to survey results we have tabulated to date. vovndg citq i 4Q RAMSEY COUNTY MINNESOTA _ 2401 HIGHWAY 10 MOUNDS VIEW, MINN. 55112 7843055 Dear Parks and Recreation Commissioners: DEPARTMENT OF PARKS, RECREATION ANO FORESTRY March 26, 1980 Enclosed is your packet of information for the Thursday, March 27, 1980, Park Commission Meeting scheduled for 6:30 PM in the City Hall Council Chambers. The two major items we will be discussing are an update on Silver View Park and the joint powers agreement for Edgewood Junior High School. Staff will be presenting additional back- ground information at the meeting on both issues, prior to requesting a formal recommendation. In addition, staff has requested that Dr. George Christensen and John Ostlund from the school district be present to review the proposed joint powers agreement from their prospective. If you have any questions regarding the proposed agenda and/or the packet, feel free to give me a call at 784-3055, extension #41. r� , irr Parks, Recreation Jr Forestry BKA/sa