HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packets - 1980/03/27City of Mounds View
Parks and Recreation Commission
Thursday, March 27, 1980
6:30 p.m.
Mounds View City Hall Council Chambers
2401 Highway 10
Mounds View, Minnesota 55112
AGENDA
1. Call to Order
2. Roll Call
3. Minutes Approval for February 28, 1980
4. Chairman's Report
5. Councilmember's Report
6. Visitor Presentation
7. Joint Powers Agreement/Edgewood Junior High Park/School
a. Dr. George Christensen, Director Community Education
b. John Ostlund, Community Education Coordinator
8. Silver View Park Update
a. City Council
b. Planning Commission
9. Planning Update
10. Spring Brochure
11. Satellites for summer baseball program
12. Portable park shelter buildings
13. National Park and Recreation Month
14. Staff Report
15. Adjournment
* Denotes those items that need formal Commission action.
20
T
MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
CITY OF BOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
I
Regular Session
February 28, 1980
Mounds View City Hail
Council Chambers
6:30 p.m.
Call to Order The Mounds View Parks and Recreation Commission was called
to order at 6:35 p.m. by Chairman Wayne Burmeister.
Roll Call Commissioners present - Chairman Burmeister, Commissioners Linke,
Scott, Dennehy, Weflen, Bowmaii, Fedor and Silvis.
Commissioners absent - Commissioner Kuluvar and Councilmember
Ziebarth.
Staff present - Director Anderson, Program Supervisor Kvalheim
and Intern Stottlemyer.
Visitors present - Cary Tushie, representing Saunders - Thalden
and Associates, Inc., Jeff Nelson, Clerk Administrator and
Mayor McCarty.
Swearing -In
Office Clerk -Administrator Nelson swore in all 1980 Parks and Rec-
reation Commissioners.
Minutes Commissioner Fedor made a motion to appove the minutes and
Commissioner Scott seconded the motion. Motion passed.
6 ayes
0 nayes
Comprehensive Director Anderson reviewed the update report on the progress
Parks i Open of the Comprehensive Parks b Open Space Plan. Director Anderson
Space Plan suggested that the Commission set three dates for public hearings
Update of the plan.
Gary Tushie reviewed the preliminary plan with the Commission.
Preliminary Survey Tabulation has suggested that as to date:
65 - 70% return has been received from community homes.
5 - IOx return has been received from the mobile home
and apartments.
232 overall return from the 3600 surveys which were dis-
tributed.
Public Hearing Dates are scheduled for:
* Thursday, April 10 from 7:00 - 9:00 p.m. for the
City Hall, Lambert, Pinewond, Greenfield, Hillview i
Oakwood Park areas.
* Saturday, April 12 from 10:00 a.m. - 12:00 noon for
the Groveland. Arden and Red Oak Park areas.
* Thursday, April 17 from 7:00 - 9:00 P.M. for the Lakeside
Park, Silverview, Wooderent, Random and Edgewood Park
areas.
Commissioner Scott made a motion to hold all three meetings at
milLutes <- February U, 1930
City Ball. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Fedor. Motion
passed.
8 ayes
0 nayes
Maintenance Director Anderson reviewed the issue of the maintenance of
Standards school outdoor recreation facilities which is used by City
residents and students. The Joint Powers Agreement maintenance
criteria as set by School District #621 was reviewed. Comm-
issioner Linke suggested that the City maintain the outdoor
facilities during the summer if monetary support is received
from the School District. Direct Anderson offered to collect
data outlining the approximate time and cost of maintenance
of school outdoor facilities in 1981. It was suggested that
Dr. Christiansen from the School District be invited to the
April Parks and Recreation Commission meeting. Also it was
suggested that the Athletic Associations be informed of the
difficulties with field maintenance so LhIt they may lend some
understanding to the problem.
Commissioner Linke made a motion that the City can only maintain
outdoor facilities at the same level as 1979 and that even though
the Commission believes that the City can do a better job of main-
taining school ballfields, the financial capacities are limited.
Commissioner Scott seconded the motion. Motion passed.
8 ayes
0 nayes
Commissioner Burmeister made a motion that the Parks & Recreation
Commission feels the City is more cost effective in the maintenance
of outdoor facilities of the School District and therefore believes
that the School District #621 should contribute total final costs
for maintenance rendered by the City at school outdoor facilities.
Motion was seconded by Commissioner Weflen. Motion passed.
7 ayes
0 nayes
Commissioner Silvis made a motion that a meeting be held between
the Parks & Recreation Commission and School District 0621.
Commissioner Scott seconded the motion. Motion passed.
7 ayes
0 nayes
It was also suggested that Public Works Superintendent Larry
Decheine be present at the uipetIng.
After -School Program Supervisor Kvalheim reviewed the new After -School Program.
Program
Winter Skating Student Intern Jeff Stottlemyer reviewed the 1980 Winter Skating
Program Program.
a
Staff Re ort Director Anderson reported that a new department secretary was ^1
hired. She is Sandy Wheaton. Also Director Anderson referred the
Commission to a letter sent by Short -Elliot -Hendrickson, Inc.
Consulting Engineers itemising development costa for the proposed-..'
Kraus - Anderson/City Park Development.
Finally, Director Anderson reporthed that there has not been any
provisions in the budget for satellites at the parks. however,
there has been ntmmerou4 complaints by residents of the community _
Minutes -3- Tebruaey 20, 1990''
because of the lack of toilet facilities in the parks. Cosmissioner
Linke suggested that staff conduct a study to establish cost figures
at ballfield parksites for Lite provision of satellites and the cost
for permanent toilet structures inside a stationary building.
Commissioner Scott seconded the motion. Motion passed.
7 ayes
0 nayes
It was also suggested that the City Council become aware of this
problem.
Commissioner Linke requested information on portable park trailer
house shelters. He also introduced Donna Bowman as the 1980
Lakeside Park Commission Chairperson. It was reported that a
meeting between the Lakeside Park Commission and Ramsey County
will be held March 17 at 7:30 a.m. at Metro Square Building.
Adjournment Commissioner Weflen made a motion to adjourn. Motion was seconded
by Commissioner Scott. Motion passed unanimously. The meeting
adjourned at 8:50 p.m.
C
ME i O:4Staf
r' a��� Recreation . or;� issi..,,,., ,
FROM: DATE: 9�
RE: Joint Powe s greement/Edgewood Jr. High School
Enclosed is a copy of a draft joint powers agreement from the School District
which will supercede the agreement that was drafted on June 12, 1978. The
agreement has been drafted to delineate and clearly define the responsibilities
for the maintenance of the Edgewood Jr. High School facility.
As can be noted in Copy E, the City will be responsible for the following:
1. Scarifying, dragging and replacing the ag-lime at the four softball/
baseball fields. (School District would expend any capitol money
i.e. cost of ag-lime.)
2. Responsible for the maintenance of ice skating surface.
3. We would assume the responsibility of spot checking the tennis court
nets and standards.
4. We would install and or locate corner anchors for the football/soccer
fields and goal posts.
5. We would purchase and install ground sleeves as base anchors at each
of the four fields. (Approximate one time cost would be $120.00)
6. We would broom the trails once per year as part of our street sweeping
contract.
7. We would be responsible for trimming on an as needs basis for the top
athletic area only.
8. Trash pick up and removal for the four ballfields would be our respon-
sibility.
9. Joint cooperation would be the key factor to ensure proper coordination
and control regarding the scheduling of the site.
As the City has been performing each of these maintenance responsibilities for
the past two years staff would recommend that the City enter into the joint
powers agreement as presented by the School District. As this is a formal
policy ratification by the City Council and School Board will be required prior
to final authorization. As similar joint powers agreements are being developed
in our surrounding municipalities, staff would recommend that the policy be adopt-
ed pending the adoptions of similar joint powers agreements in New Brighton,
Shoreview and Arden Hills.
In addition to the enclosed maintenance agreement. staff has met on numerous
occasions with the school district to discuss the capitol outlay projects
scheduled for completion in 1980 and I981. The three major projects yet to be
completed are the installation of four lit tennis courts, multi -purpose building
and installation of a four lane running track. This issue has not been resolved
as there is a question as to whether the City should continue to expend capitol
funds when our surrounding neighbors have not comnnitted funds for capitol ex-
penditures. The City's position at this time has been to take a 'wait and see"
March 25 Page 2 V
attitude to determine if the positions of the surrounding communities and or
school district should alter.
Staff will be outlining the status of the joint powers agreements with Shoreview,
New Brighton and Arden Hills in greater detail at the Thursday meeting. In
addition staff has invited Dr. George Christensen, Director of Community Education
and John Ostlund, Program Coordinator to review and discuss the proposed joint
powers agreement.
a-
Aw Indt pendi•nf `rhnnl DiQof f No f,;'I
MOUNDS VIEW PUBLIC SCHOOLS /2959 NORTH HAMLINE AVENUE / ST. PAUL. MINNESOTA 55113 / PHONE 636-3650
MEMO
March 4, 1980
Revised March 24, 1980
On SANFORD C WITTER
Superinlendenf
TO: Bruce Anderson, Park, Recreation and Forestry Director of the City
of Mounds View
FROM: George Christenson and John Ostlund
RE: Proposed Joint Powers and Maintenance A reements for Edgewood Junior High
School Outside Facilities (fields, etc. and the Plans for Upgrading
the Edgewood Outside Facilities
Based on our many meetings/µldllning sessions the materials for the proposed joint
powers and maintenance agreements are ready for review by the City of Mounds View
Park and Recreation Commission and then the City Council, This joint powers
agreement would replace the one adopted June 12, 1978, copy attached... copy A.
The goal and the objectives of the joint efforts are:
GOAL - OVERALL:
TO DEVELOP AND EFFECTIVELY MAINTAIN THE MIDDLE SCHOOLS' OUTSIDE FACILITIES
(FIELDS, ETC.) FOR THE CONVENIENT USE OF THE SCHOOLS AND THE CITIES.
OBJECTIVES:
1. To provide improved outside facilities (field areas, etc.) for use by
the schools and cities.
2. To jointly develop and maintain the sites at agreed to standards of
maintenance.
3. To cooperatively plan for the use, scheduling of the use, and main-
tenance of the outside facilities, thereby using the expertise from
two staffs which should bring about better communications and more
efficient operations of all parties.
4. To reduce the amount of duplication of proposed or existing facilities,
thereby reducing the costs of development and maintenance for both the
school district and the cities.
S. To jointly share in the maintenance costs by designating which party
will perform which tasks. This should reduce the duplicate purchase
and operation of equipment and the duplication of labor costs.
In support of these proposed joint efforts to develop, schedule for use, use,
and maintain the Edgewood Junior High School outside facilities, we present on
the next pages the "founds View Schools Community Education Department and the
Mounds View Parks and Recreation Department Facilitated Usage of the Area Schools."
(copy B attached) Specifically look at the items checked which take place at
Iatleps"em somol Ltevlet No. 621 editor*$ to the princIPla that all Pomona shall have equal opptxwmty aM access
90 its a/YOMIea facilities, aetivltt*a, and eaipleyrnertt without regard to race, creed, sae, sea, or national orlgtn.
-2-
Edgewood Junior High School. The report also indicates the other activities
which take place in/on city or school property.
The purposes for the proposed joint powers agreement (copy C attached) are to:
1. Insure commitment by both the school district and the City of Mounds
View to jointly schedule the use of and to maintain the outside
facilities.
2. Insure that yearly maintenance agreements are developed and agreed to
by both parties.
3. Insure that should either party not meet its agreements there are
specific steps to be taken to review the reasons and to keep communica-
tions open between the two administrations and the School Board and the
City Council.
4. To set key check point dates for reaching agreements and for verifying
the functioning levels of communications.
The Mounds View Schools Outside Facilities Maintenance Standards (copy D at-
tached) were developed by the Park and Recreation Directors from the cities of
New Brighton, Shoreview, Arden Hills, Mounds View; John Ostlund, Coordinator of
Community Education; Mounds View School District staff members, Robert Chatfield,
Coordinator of Operations; and Alex Gadacz, Supervisor of Maintenance and Grounds;
George Christenson, Director of Community Education, Planning, Research and Re-
porting Services; and have been reviewed by the assistant principals of the four
middle schools.
These standards are the basis for the setting of the maintenance agreements.
The maintenance agreement (a copy of a partially completed form is attached -
copy E) becomes the statement in writing as what each of the parties will do dur-
ing a stated year. Based on the experience of both parties plus any new informa-
tion, a new agreement would be developed by March 15 for the coming year. A pos-
sibiiityis to have the agreements gradually cover a two (2) or three (3)year period.
In order to have this previously stated system work, the Edgewood Outside Facili-
ties have to continue to be upgraded according to the plans developed by Bruce
Anderson, the teachers, coaches and administration of Edgewood Junior High School
and school district central office staff and administrators. A copy of the plan
is attached. (copy F)
A description of the "Outside Facilities - Capital Outlay Project Update,
February 11, 1980... for Edgewood" is attached. (copy G) This describes which
has been completed and what remains to be done. The actual costs and estimates
for future work are also described in this report.
We are looking forward to the meetings with the Park and Recreation Commission
and the City Council where we will have the opportunity to discuss the proposal
and plans in detail, and hopefully continue the mutually advantageous, formal
joint powers relationships.
COPY A
RESOLUTION NO. 902
JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT REGARDING
USE OF INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 621 OUTDOOR FACILITIES
RESOLUTION OUTLINING THE DEVELOPMEMT OF THE OUTDOOR FACILITIES
AT
EDGEWOOD JR. HIGH SCHOOL
THIS AGREEMENT, Made this 12th day of June 1978 between the
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW, hereinafter referred to as the "CITY",and INDEPENDENT SCHOOL
DISTRICT NO. 621, hereinafter referred to as the "SCHOOL DISTRICT".
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, School District owns and operates Edgewood Junior High School in
the City, the premises of which include certain outdoor facilities, said school
sites delineated in red on the map attached hereto and made a part hereof as
Exhibit A, and
WHEREAS, it is the mutual desire of the Schoul District and the City to
cooperate for the purposes of permitting said Outdoor Facilities to be used for
the education and recreation activity programs of the School District and the
City, and
WHEREAS, the School District and the City desires to fill, grade and generally
up -grade the Edgewood Jr. High School outside facilities to permit utilization,
not only for the pupils of the School District, but also for the citizens of the
School District and of the City.
NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, That in consideration for the foregoing
recitals and mutual covenants and promises herein set forth, it is hereby agreed
by and between the School District and the City as follows:
Page 2 - Joint Powers ( Mounds View City - Edgewood Jr. High)
1. Installation. upgrading and repair. The City agrees
to handle all the planning, development and in -kind cost for the
following 4-year project outlining the development of outside
facilities at Edgewood Jr. High School. The actual cost of the
4-year project will be shared by the School District and the City
as indicated on a yearly basis.
1978 Edgewood Jr. High
Complete re -grading
of site
Irrigation system
Top dress and re -seed
all turf areas
AgAime for infields
1979 Edgewood Jr. High Construct -four new
tennis courts - asphalt,
lighting, color coat,
fencing, and etc.
Sub Total
Estimated Cost Source of Revenue
$ 5,000 $ 5,000 - District
15,000 15,000 - District
15,000 15,000 - District
2,500 2,500 - District
$37,500 $37,500 - District
$50,000 $25,000 - District`
25,0D0 - Mounds View
$50,000 $25,000 - District
$25.000 - Mound View
1980 Edgewood Jr. High Resurface old tennis
$ 7,000
$ 7,000 - District
-courts
Installation of 4 lane
10,00D
4,000 -.District
track
6,000 - Mounds View
Purchase of bleachers
5,000
�51000 - District
and benches
Develop a trailway system
3.000
3,0D0 - District
Knockdown hockey rink
4,000
410D0 - District
Sub Total
$29,000
$23,000 - District
6,000 - Mounds View
1981 Edgewood Jr. High Construct an outdoor
$30.500
$25,500 - District
multi -purpose building
--300 sq. feet restroom
5,000 - Mounds V:
facility
--600 sq. feet storage
--300 sq. feet community
room, warming house
$30,500
$25,500 - District
5,0D0 - Mounds View
Page 14 - Joint Powmrs (Mounds View City - Edge'wood Jr. high)
2. Easement foregress and ingress. School District hereby grants to the
City, its agents and employees, and participants in its recreational
activities, programs or events an easement for egress and ingress to
said Outside facilities so long as this Agreement is in effect.
3. Indemnification.
a. School District's indemnification of City. The School District
hereby agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the City against any
and all claims for damages, of whatever nature, arising from or in
consequence of the duties it has assumed hereunder and also
arising from or in consequence of its operation, supervision,
control or conducting of any of its recreational activities,
programs or events or related activities utilizing said Outside
Facilities.
b. City's Indemnification of School District. City hereby agrees to
indemnify and hold harmless the School District against any
and all claims for damages of whatever nature, arising from or
in consequence of the duties it has assumed hereunder and also
arising from or in consequence of its operation, supervision, control
or conducting of its recreational activities, programs or events
or related activities utilizing said Outside Facilities.
c. Nature and Extent of Indemnification. The indemnification set
forth in the previous two subparagraphs of this Paragraph 3 shall
protect the indemnitee and its successors, from and against any
and all actions, proceedings, claims, demands, costs, damages and
expenses, including reasonable attorneys' fees which it may pay,
sustain or incur.
Page 4 = Joint Powers (Mounds View City - Edgewood Jr. High)
4. Use of Facilities. The School District hereby grants to the City
permission and license to conduct at such times, after school hours
and on weekends, as will not interfere with regular school curriculum
and related activities, on said Outside Facilities, such recreational
activities, programs, or events, as the City desires to conduct to
utilize the Outside Facilities for the optimum benefit of citizens
living within the School District in general and citizens of the
City in particular. To this end, the School District shall upon
execution of this Agreement furnish the Parks and Recreation Director
of the City with a schedule of the dates and times on which the School
District may be utilizing the said Outside Facilities in connection
with its regular school curriculum and related activities. Use of the
facility shall be governed by School District Policy f1330.
4a. It is understood that the parties will confer on a future agreement
effecting maintenance of the facilities.
5. Termination. The parties may terminate this Agreement, prior to the
end of its terms, by the mutual agreement of the School District and
the City, or by either party giving the other sixty (60) days prior
written notice of termination.
6. Duration. This agreement shall be in force and of effect upon its
execution by the respective parties following authorization by
Resolution of the governing bodies thereof and shall thereafter remain
in full force and of effect for a period of four (4) years. It may be
renewed thereafter by the mutual written agreement of the parties.
7. Binding Effect. This Agreement shall be binding upon the parties and
their successors.
P.ige 5 - Joint Powers (Mounds View City - Edgewood Jr. High)
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement
to be executed on their behalf by their respective undersigned officers, as
duly authorized by their respective governing bodies, as of the day and year
first above written.
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
ay ;e r
Its Mayor
(Corporate Seal)
By
is Clerk
INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 621
By
Its Chairman
(Corporate Seoi)
" A -
BY0
Its Clerk
COPY 8
ACTIVITY
MOUNDS VIEW SCHOOLS
AGE GROUP
COMMUNITY EDUCATION DEPARTMENT AND THE MOUNDS VIEW
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
FACILITATED USAGE OF AREA SCHOOLS
TYPE OF
SPONSOR FACILITATOR LOCATION FACILITY
Basketball
Youth 3-6 grd.
M.V.Parks
M.V.Parks
R.O., PW.
Gyms
Youth 3-9 grd.
IBA Assoc.
M.V.Parks
p/ R.O., PW, EW.
Gyms
Adult
M.V.Parks
M.V.Parks
VEW.
Gyms
Softball - Boys/
Youth
M.V.Parks
M.V.Parks
- 1.0., PW., EW.
Fields
Girls
b Parks
- Adults
Mens/Womens/Co.Rec.M.Y.Parks
M.V.Parks
✓PW., EW. b Parks
Fields
T-Ball
Youth K-3 grd.
M.V.Parks
M.V.Parks
✓1F.0., PW.. EW. b
Fields
Parks
Baseball
Youth
Assoc.
M.V.Parks
✓EW., PW., R.O.,
Fields
b Parks
8-Ball
Youth 8 yr.Old
M.V.Parks
M.V.Parks
✓EW.,R.O., PW. b
Fields
Parks
'
Soccer
Youth 3-9 grd.
M.V.Parks
M.V.Parks
✓ EW.
Fields
6th grd.-Adult
M.V.Parks
M.V.Parks
,-EW.
Fields
Football - Flag
Youth
Assoc.}M.V.
M.V.Parks
✓ EW. b Parks
Fields
Youth 4-9 grds.
Assoc. Pks.
M.V.Parks
✓,EW. b Parks
Fields
Adult
M.V.Parks
M.V.Parks
✓✓ EW. b Parks
Fields
Gymnastics
Youth/Adult
M.V.Parks
M.V.Parks
V EW., PW.
Gyms
Swimming
Youth b Adult Inst.M.V.Parks
M.V.Parks
v,FW. b Beaches
Pool/Lake
- AAU
Youth b AdulL
Assoc.
M.V.Parks
t/ EW
Pool
Hockey
Youth
Assoc.
M.V.Parks
&/EW. b Parks
Rinks
Wrestling
Youth
Assoc.
M.V.Parks
✓ EW. b Iron.
Gyres
Volleyball
Adults
M.V.Parks
M.V.Parks
✓ EW.
Gyms
Playgrounds
Youth
M.V.Parks
M.V.Parks
-"Parks, EW., PW.,
Open
b R.O.
Golf
Youth b Adult
M.V.Parks
M.V.Parks
✓ EW. b Golf Course
Gyms 3
Course
Tennis
Youth b Adult
M.V.Parks
M.V.Parks
✓ EW. b Parks
Courts
Ice Skating
Youth b Adult
M.V.Parks
M.V.Parks
v Parks b EW.
Rinks
Scouting
Youth
Boy Scout
Comm.Ed.
R.O., PW.
Classrooms
Girl Scouts
Campfire
Early Ohildhood
Youth/Adult
Coma.Ed.
Comm.Ed.
CRC
Classrooms
A Family Ed.
Senior Citizens
Adult
Sunrise Sr.
M.V.Parks
Church
Room
J
Adult
M.V.Park
M.V.Parks
Park
Room
-2-
XCTIVITY AGE GROUP
SPONSOR
FACILITATOR LOCATION
TYPE OF
FACILITY
Story Youth
M.V.Parks
M.V.Parks
Park
Rope
Noe-School
ur
Adult Education Adults
Comm.Ed.
Comm.Ed.
CRC
Center
(ADB., GED., HSD)
Bridge Adults
M.V.Parks
M.V.Parks
c%Parks & £W.
Classroom
Adult Enrichment Adults
Comm.Ed.
Comm.Ed.
✓ EW. & Iron.
Classroom
Business/Language
Arts/Crafts
Look What's Cooking
Sewing 'n Needlecraft
Special Interest
Outdoor Education
Ladies Day/ Adults
M.V.Parks
M.V.Parks
Open
---------
Gadabouts
Health Services Youth/Adult
Ramsey Cty.
Comm.Ed.
CRC
Class,
Youth Service Bureau Family
Y.S.B.
Comm.Ed.
CRC
Classroom
School - Extra Youth.
School
School
-----R.O., PW.,
EW.
Curricular
- Softball Youth
School
School
LX R.O., PW.,
EW.
& Parks
Boys/Girls
- Baseball Youth
School
School
t/ R.O., PW.,
EW.
& Parks
- Soccer Youth
School
School
✓ R.O., PW.,
EW.
& Parks
- Swimming Youth
School
School
` EW.
- Football Youth
School
School
✓R.0., PW.,
EW.
& Parks
- Basketball Youth
School
School
✓R.0., PW.,
EW.
&
ron .
- Volleyball Youth
School
School
R.O., PW.,
EW.
& Iron.
- Skiing Youth
School
School
✓ EW., Iron.
& Parks
- Hockey Youth
School
School
✓R.O., PW.,
EW.
& Rinks
Skiing (After- Youth 7-12 grd.
Comm.Ed.
Comm.Ed.
Afton Alps
Slopes ...:;
School)
Skiing Youth
M.V.Parks
M.V.Parks
Open
Slopes
Extension Classes Adults
Anoka Ramsey
Comm.Ed.
t/EW.
Classroom.'
Comm.Coll.
Tap & Ballet Youth
M.V.Parks
M.V.Parks
SS
Gym
Firearms Safety Youth
M.V.Parks
Ii.V.Parks
Park
Room
Cross Country Ski Youth/Adults
M.V.Parks
M.V.Parks
----Parks & EW.
Course
Youth/Adults
Comm.Ed.
Comn.Cd.
Irundale
Outside
Youth Trips Youth
M.V.Parks
M.V.Parks
Open
Open
Badminton Adults
M.V.Parks
M.V.Parks
✓ EW
Gym
Bridge Brigade Adults
Ii.V.Parks
II.V.Parks
EW & Parks
Room
Evening Bridge Adults
M.V.Parks
M.V.Parks
46liday Crafts Adults
M.V.Parks
M.V.Parks
PW
Room
Jazz Dance Exercise Adults
M.V.Parks
M.V.Parks
Parks
Roan =
Racquetball Adults
M.V.Parks
Ii.V.Parks
Commercial
_
League/Lessons
-3-
"':TIVITY
AGE GROUP
SPONSOR
FACILITATOR
LOCATION
TYPE OF
FACILIT
Obedience
Adult
M.V.Parks
M.V.Parks
r/ EW.
Gym
First Aid Inst.
Adults
M.V.Parks
M.V.Parks
Parks
Roam
Open Gym
Adults
M.V.Parks
M.V.Parks
✓ EW.
Gym
Ping Pong Tournament
Adults
M.V.Parks
M.V.Parks
,,,' EW.
Gyre
Firearms Safety
Youth
M.V.Parks
ft.V.Parks
Jr.High Dances
Youth
M.V.Parks
M.V.Parks
--EW.
Gym
Kid Napers/Youth
Youth
M.V.Parks
M.V.Parks
,/EW.
Movies
Youth
M.V.Parks
fi.V.Parks
Parks
After School Youth
Youth
M.V.Parks
M,V.Parks
PW. 6 R.O.
Gym
Puppet Wagon
Youth
M.V.Parks
M.V.Parks
✓R.0., PW., EW.,
Park b Community
Storyhour
Youth
M.V.Parks
M.V.Parks
.p
r
l
'.L
REVISED DRAFT 3/4/80
F.nGEWOOD
JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT REGARDING
DEVELOP14ENT AND USE OF INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 621 OUTSIDE FACILITIES
AT
EUGEWOOD JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL
THIS AGREEMENT, made this day of , 1980 between the CITY OF
MOUNDS VIEW, hereinafter referred to as the "CITY" and INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIS-
TRICT NO. 621, hereinafter referred to as the "SCHOOL DISTRICT".
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the School District owns and operates Edgewood Junior High, the
premises of which include certain outside facilities, said school sites delineated
in red on the map attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit A, and
WHEREAS, it is the mutual desire of the School District and the City to coop-
erate for the purposes of permitting said outside facilities to be used for the edu-
cation and recreation activity programs of the School District and the City, and
WHEREAS, the School District and the City desires to upgrade and maintain the
Edqewood Junior High' outside facilities to permit utilization, not only by the
pupils of the School District, but also by the citizens of the School District
and of the City,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that in consideration of the foregoing reci-
tals and mutual covenants and promises herein set forth, it is hereby agreed by and
between the School District and the City as follows:
1. INSTALLATIONt__UPGRADING MAC INTENANCE AND REPAIR
The City agrees to participate in the maintenance and development
of the outside facilities at Edgewood Junior High.
The City's contributions will consist of in -kind services (i.e.,
grading, engineering, mowing, repairing and replacement) and/or capi-
tal equipment for a total of $36,000 for the three (3) year period
1979, 1980 and 1981. Specific maintenance agreements will be developed
mutually by both parties before March 15, 1980 for this three (3) year
time period.
The -form and amount of the City's and District's contributions
starting with 1982 and thereafter will be detailed yearly in a main-
tenance agreement between the City and the School District. approved
by March 15 each year.
-'l-
Should the maintenance agreements not be mutually agreed to by March 15
as stated above or should the maintenance agreements mutually agreed to
not be honored by either party, this joint powers agreement shall be
jointly reviewed within ninety (90) days after March 15 or from the date
the agreement was not honored.
2. EASEMENT FOR EGRESS AND INGRESS
The School District hereby grants to the City, its agents and employees,
and participants in its scheduled recreational activities, programs or
events, an egress and ingress to said outside facilities so long as this
agreement is in effect.
3. INDEMNIFICATION
a. School District's indemnification of City. The School District hereby
agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the City against any and all
claims for damages, of whatever nature, arising from or in consequence
of the duties it has assumed hereunder and also arising from or in
consequence of its operation, supervision, control or conducting of
any of its recreational activities, programs or events or related
activities utilizing said outside facilities.
b. City's indemnification of School District. The City hereby agrees to
indemnify and hold harmless the School District against any and all'
claims for damages of whatever nature, arising from or in consequence
of the duties it has assumed hereunder and also arising from or in
consequence of its operation, supervision, control or conducting of
its recreational activities, programs or events or related activities
utilizing said outside facilities.
c. Nature and extent of indemnification. The indemnification set forth
in the previous two subparagraph, of this paragraph 3 shall protect
the indemnitee and its successors, from and against any and all ac-
tions, proceedings, claims, demands, costs, damages and expenses,
including reasonable attorneys' fees which it may pay, sustain or
incur,
4. USE OF FACILITIES
The School District hereby grants to the City permission and license to
conduct at such times, after school hours, and on weekends, as will not
interfere with regular school curricular, co -curricular and related
activities, on said outside facilities. such recreational activities,
programs, or events, as the City desires to conduct, to utilize the' z
INS
outside facilities for the optimum benefit of citizens living within
the School District in general and citizens of the City in particular.
To this end, the School District shall, upon execution of this agreement,
furnish the Parks and Recreation Director of the City with a schedule of
the dates and times on.which the School District may be utilizing the*
said outside facilities in connection with its regular and summer school
curriculums and related activities. Use of the facility shall be
governed by, School District Policy #1330.
5. TERMINATION
The parties may terminate this agreement by the mutual agreement of the
School District and the City, or by either party giving the other ninety
(90) days prior written notice of termination.
6. DURATION
This agreement shall be in force and of effect upon its execution by the
respective parties following authorization by resolution of the governing
bodies thereof and shall remain in full force until officially terminated.
1. BINDING EFFECT
This agreement shall be binding upon the parties and their successors.
10
-4-
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this agreement to be
executed on their behalf by their respective undersigned officers, as duly author-
ized by their respective governing bodies, as of the day and year first above
written.
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
(Corporate Seal) By
Its Mayor
By
Its Clerk
INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 621
(Corporate Seal) By_
Its Chairman
By
Its Verk
'
tvr r u -
•
t[f • //// Mfere dolly usage
• Mau ontNreel/aoatw
aCt1•itles ore based an
a::t annually
vy,. ;s:ta!!stlllna,..
tiGu�
.�K r
YI'M ii*As Ovi+.- • �Si MIS MA1111trWt[
S1�K
• papa as "ended
Standards
Oulatemance
required for satisfactory site/fetllity usage.
APRll
f1tT
JW1[
JOLT
AUG.
S[/1.
OCT
NOT.
ItwIAKATION
Astons Maintenance A►a/ActlrltY
�. trait Areas for Sites
I, IrMiag
a•ag
saor
aMXg
rear
mug
sure
ag■•
,
t►.Me��ly..Aaalnus Of3•-dty.tYdo.
1. Trim
Trio
soon
rays
am
Axis
rasa
EXMM
ago•
2. Meetly olsimams every Ion masks.
1. As per recoeald soil/SyStats SO&&*
_.•
�. baseball/sofiboll infield:
1. Oral
'•//
////
////
////
////
////
//••
1. ay o/ Ncb lsagw/CMfer.an w.e•
2. lima /lsylng Fields
••//
////
////
////
////
////
//••
2. Day e/ Ncb league/Confaranco CMr.
►ootball/seater Infields:
• 1. lima flayfog Yields
..aA
Xa:u
Xrar
XXXX
rare{
RXXX
2. or Paint tw e/wntA.
s. Trask Refuses
1. Metyp Site +
••Xz
AXIS
rags
SUA
Xmas
aMaa
aaX■
•■..
1. Once/welt or as
2. Once/week a► as needed.
• 1. Em►tY ReceftaclaM
paaa•
Arks
ARN%
NASA
rkix
MUR
$gag
'. 1eMIS CowU:
1. Isswl. Nets/Standards
••XX
arXs
amaa
XXXX
main
Asia
• XaXX
•...
1. Once/Meek.
2. TlgbtoWleAeI►
.•.•
.•.•
.•,•
.••■
,•••
papa
,•..
•...
2. As "Wod. -
. 1a11eYba11vets Co:
1. Inspet Nets/Standards
pass
roar
rug
SAME
XXXX
agog
same
•...
•
I. onco/week.
2. Tigbten/Aepair
.■.•
.p.■
.•.•
.•.■
.•.•
..
.•.•
...
2. As seeded.
:• 'Sip ImagactiM:
1. Total Overview
XaaX
Maas
all"
rMMr
rigs
minx
aXkg
rMRE
1. OnceMeek.
2. As neeeded.
2.. Mort Orders/mrair
.■.•
.•.•
.■
.•.•
.•.•
.• •
papa
:taanasl/fariodia fYiopnsmce
�. gross Aromas
1. Fortltlalsg
su..
1. Once/Year.
1. Sedtng
2. Mesa Control
Asa.
...b
a:..
E...
1. Once/Yost.
1. OstUyMr.
d, Aeration
at..
•.aa
4• Oaif/yNr.
3. Irrlbatloo System:
1• InsgeetlM few tfloctivesess
..r.
..a..
..a..
' ..a.
..E.
..t.
..E.
S.
ii..
1. Once/0091.
2. Once/year.
!. OrataisM.
Usebslllsoftball Isflelds:
1. Scarify
..aa
1. Once/foorly.
2. Allier Replacement
...a&
2. As ote"lospctlon/nork order.
3. lasfect.isso Anobews
..but
S"M
atoms
aarS
XXXa
aaMX
Aa•■
S. Meetly
ti Feneea/StgsUBanlarU�mN miles
1. "IV
•..•
•.•.
•.•.
•.•.
•.■•
papa
••■•
■••.
1. As needed/taspctMllMarb Neer.
• TrMIs Coort/tlack Top SwracNT
/PAP
�aa
8eiwlly. broom
�edep
2. Cracks
.M
2.
• 9rlrwwyUhrtlq/Tro11 Avast
1. ' Resurfacing
1. Basso oa/fngaet/trt/uarO dollar.
2. l/oi
1. Basil on/lnSptNalyoork Neer.
3. �„10delp
S. After am saasralt.
SbroMs
• 1. Trim
.aa.
1. Annwl.
1. WMr
.•.•
.•.•
••,•
2. As ftoWUMiattl@~ udwo
geresea/o1NtMrUtibf rocks:
1. Repair
papa
•••'
•'•`
•'•■
•••'
'•••
'■''
•0.8
1. As tnMr.
osi MA
1. RelosetieUStarage
...•
...•
...•
...•
Al Ndsr4M/WN*
oo
Field Event Mts/Molloybell Court-
1. Saba Replacamost
1. basso Will$P ttlaNu % OeNr.
2. ferim"s, Rgolr
I. Basso M/ta/AsittM/e:oA bads►.
Tracks
1. gwfste Metals,
..Se
,
1. AMwI
2. n-agglq
..•.
..•.
...
...•
...•
...■
1. M oeoded/InspctioNMrl: NM►.
• voter toeetalos
�Closo►
..am
ModWinspa1111wa k ~0
1.
_.
11"1Ice,
ABas
loaning:
1. to
S. lewd Const"allas/Re/eir
rndhgt
s
�i
LlgbtUEsKranteJfarting/tasXelq
1. BaAolr
...•
...•
...•
...•
...•
...•
...•
...•
1. As asedsl/botssttMn/obe!< tNd)s'.
-
0
lAlua livaooK
COPY 6
OUTSIDE FACILITIES - CAPITAL OUTLAY PROJECT UPDATE _=
FEBRUARY 11, 1980
This report is a revision from the last report of April 3, 1979 and
revised cost estimates of July 16, 1979..
COMPLETION COST/ STATUS IN
JECT DATE ESTIMATE ORIGINAL PROPOSAL
EWOOD WORK COMPLETED
Survey 8 regrading of site Sept.'78 $13',133.00 Sch.Dist. Part of original proposal
Irrigation system installed
Top -dress 6 re -seed all turf
Ag-lime infields
Purchase b installation of
backstops
stallation of blacktop
ai➢way
Purchase of players benches
3,075.00 MoundsView
Sept.'78 16,700.00 Sch.Dist. Part of original proposal
650.00 MoundsView
Sept.'78 10,686.00 Sch.Dist. Part of original proposal
3,450.00 MoundsView '
Sept.'78 2,489.00 Sch.Dist. Part of original proposal
50.00 MoundsView
June '79 2,000.00 Sch.Dist. Addition to original
3,921.00 MoundsView proposal
Aug. '79 8,252.00 Sch.Dist. Part of original proposal
(Additional footage)
July.'79 2,256.00 MoundsView_
SUB TOTAL $53,260.00 Sch.Dist.
13,402.00 I-loundsView
$66,662.00 - EXPENSES TO DATE
JECTS TO BE COMPLETED
Installation of four lane track Est.'80 $10,000.00
Installation of four lighted Est.'80 50,000.00
tennis courts
Part of original proposal
Part of original proposal
Completion of field protection, Est.'80 1,700.00 Addition to original
curbing, railing or fencing proposal
Construction of outdoor multi- ? 18,638.00 Part of original proposal
purpose building SUB TOTAL $80,338.00 - Estimated Expenses
GRAND TOTAL $147.000.00
JECTS REVISED ESTIMATE 7 79
N-hool District $111,000.00
,unds View 36.000.00
ESTIMATED 7/79 TOTAL $147,000.00 ?.
MEMO TO. Mounds View Parks and Recreation Commission
FROM: Staff
DATE: March 25, 1980
RE: Silver View Park Update
Attached is a copy of the map that has been agreed upon in concept by
both the Planning Commission and City Council at their recent meetings.
In addition I have enclosed the minutes from the City Planning Commission
which outlines in detail the proceedings of their meeting.
It appears at this time that the general framework for a land swap, grant
or park dedication is now reaching the preliminary concept stage. It should
be noted that the planning review we have been through during the past four
weeks was strictly a preliminary concept approval for the proposed zoning and
land uses as presented.
The next phase of the process is to interview and hire a consultant to do the
preliminary design and construction documents for the park property. Staff
would once again encourage and solicit the Commissions involvement in this
process and recommend the following process:
1. Staff would preliminary screen five to seven planning consultants and
firms whom they feel are capable of performing the projects as
outlined. Suggested firms might be:
a. Inter -Design
b. Saunders and Thalden
c. Brauer and Associates
d. Bather, Ringwood and Rose
e. Derrick Grow and Associates
f. Developmental Concepts
g. Tim Erko�lle and Associates
Completed by April 1S, 1980
2. Staff would submit a staff report recommending three firms that would
be formally interviewed by the Parks and Recreation Commission.
Completed by April 24, 1980
3. The Parks and Recreation Commission would then request proposals
from the firms of their choice.
Completed by April 2,, 1980
4. Parks and Recreation Commission would make a recommendation to the City
Council for their review.
Completed by April 24, 1980
S. City Council enters into a contract with a planner.
Completed by April 28, 1980
HWl-GJI GJ, 1JW
Page Z
The one major issue that is yet to be resolved in regards to the site develop-
ment of Silver View centers around the final configuration of W. pond. The
developer has stated that he is willing to develop the pond to a 2 - 3' level
at a cost not to exceed $250,000. Staff is recommending that an additional
48,000 cubic yards of fill be removed at the developers expense. As this
is a fairly complex issue staff will be presenting a verbal report with sup-
porting visual material to better define the issues at hand on Thursday.
The second consideration involved in the planning process to date is L.A.W.C.O.N.
applications for phase 2 development are due on May 2. The impact of this
issue centers around the fact that the City will be in a better position to be
funded if the issue of park re -location were, finalized prior to final review
which is scheduled for the first week in June.
As a final note it should be remembered that construction of the pond would not
commence until the winter of 1981 at the earliest which means general construc-
tion of the park site will be delayed until Spring, 1981.
MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION Regular Meeting
Pae2
--g----------------March_lii_1i80 <'
Chairperson Mountin noted the memo dated 3/19/80
regarding the proposed Case Review Format. She asked
that the Commission consider use of the format.
Haakc moved to remove Item #6 from the table. Seconded 6. PRELIMINARY CONCEPT
by Burmeister. 7 ayes REViEWAL P.U.D.
0 nays
Official Rose introduced the item as an additional step
review requested by the Applicant and desired by the City
for their proposed P.U.D. development. This step was felt
to be advantageous, due to the City's development of a
community park and the Applicant's interest in developing
an approximate 100 acre parcel. The parcel in question and
under review is basicly bounded by Long Lake Road, County
Road H2, Silver Lake Road and County Road 1. The City's
existing zoning of the area is a combination of R-1, R-2,
R-4 and 1-1. The Comprehensive Plan designates the area
mixed P.U.D. to include Commercial, Public and Residential.
The Applicant, in his letter to you dated 1/9/80, has pro-
posed such a sketch proposal. He has also listed five
points of concern, which he would like the City to agree
with or give him some direction with which he can use to
start his P.U.D. process.
Staff recommends that you comment on his five points of
concern and further, give him direction with regard to any
additional specifics you might recommend be incorporated
in his P.U.D. planning pr,,cess. This recommendation that
the Planning Commission might make does not short-circuit
the three step P.U.D. process, but only becomes a vantage
point for both the City and the Applicant. The vantage
for the City would be to complete the park relocation swap,
purchase and dedication process and for the Applicant, the,
direction necessary for him to start his P.U.D. process.
blazer stated he felt the process was being cut short.
Suggested that the Applicant start at the ConcepL Stage
of the P.U.D. process.
Official Rose assured him that there was no short cut of the
P.U.D. process.
Park Director Anderson gave a brief overview of hls staff
memo dated March 17, 1980. Mr. Anderson stated that the
Parks and Recreation Commission had been studying and re-
viewing the Silver View Park issue since August, 1976.
It was the consensus of the Park Commission that the re-
location proposal as presented would be a benefit to botR,
the developer and the City. Anderson further stated that
the current park proposal was arrived at following 18
months of compromise and negotiation with both the Park
HOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION Regular Meeting
----------------------------------------------------------------March_12;_ig80
.omission, the Developer and City Council. Anderson 6. PRELIMINARY CONCEP
concluded his report by stating that the June I, 1980 REVIEWAL P.U.G.
deadline was required to consumate the land deal so (cost.)
that construction could commence.
Applicant was asked to comment. Dale Cremers, for the
Applicant, had no comment at this time.
Haake questioned how the actual land swap, purchase and
dedication was to occur. Director Anderson explained
the approximate acreages and the time frame it was hoped
to be completed in.
Fedor requested how the ownership of the pond was to
occur and the value of the dedication. Director
Anderson stated the ownership would be by the City and
that it was hoped to be part of the preliminary concept
agreement. The value of the dedication depends on the
appraisal used and the land itself. Anderson referred
to the appraisals the City had received.
Burmeister had no questions or statements at this time.
Skiba had no questions or statements at this time.
Glazer had no questions or statements at this time.
McCarthy had no questions or statements at this time.
Mountin asked Director Anderson where the City was with
regard to the Comprehensive Plan Park process. Anderson
replied that Staff and Council would be reviewing the
survey in the near future. Public hearings have been
scheduled. He further noted that this survey did not
cover Silver View Park. That �-,tudy will be done by
L.A.W.C.O.N. funds and a separate issue.
Dale Cremers and Dick Cush, o' Kraus -Anderson, were at
the meeting on behalf of the is i owners. Cremers stated
that he felt it would be easier and more profitable for
Kraus -Anderson to develop the iand under the existing
zonings. Kraus -Anderson has chosen not to, due to
Mounds View Staff's insistence that Kraus -Anderson use
the Comprehensive Plan designation of Mixed P.U.D. He
stated that Kraus -Anderson is not a residential developer
but, due to the City's interest in that usage and the
potential marketability of the residential use, Kraus -
Anderson has decided to develop a major portion of their
holdings as residential. Kraus -Anderson also supports
the park relocation and acres noted in the Staff reports.
He asked the Commission to give him direction fran which
to further his plan before he spends additional monies.
In turn, he would try to accommodate these concerns as
best he could. He would also like to assist In the
Staff deadline timing with regard to the park land swap,
MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION Regular Meeting
Pa e 4 ____---March 19j—a980
dedication and purchase so that the City might continue
with funding. Out of 100 acres of land, this proposal
gives them 56 acres. They have studied the area needs
for this land and it confirmed the City's designation of
min:... it-U.D.
Cremers further discussed the lake development. He noted
that the City's Engineer recommended the deepening of the
lake an additional two feet. He agreed with this, but
stated the City would then be requested to participate.
They would also be willing to allow the assessing of the
additional cost, of which they would, in turn, be respon-
sible for another approximate 40%.
Overall, he felt their proposal was a plus to the community
and that was Kraus-Andersons Intent and style.
If the City and Kraus -Anderson completed a preliminary
concept agreement, they would Immediately start the
agency review process formally, as well as preparing for
the P.U.O. process.
Haake questioned whether the City should change the depth
of the pond in lieu of the recommendation from S.E.H.
Rose replied that, due to the necessity of outside agency
reviewal and approvals, the City might accept the blue -
line drawing as presented by the Applicant's Engineer.
Upon receiving the agency reviewals, the City may then
be more able to determine certain aesthetic values of
the pond.
To clarify the issue to what extent the Applicant would
develop the proposed lake, he was asked If they would
develop it at no ca,.-� to the City, pursuant to the blue -
line drawing sumbittt' by the Kraus -Anderson engineer.
Cremers, answering for the Applicant, stated they
would.
Fedor discussed the residential land uses, feeling they
might be better defined.
Burmeister questioned the height of the elderly high
rise proposal, stating that there were height re-
strictions In our code.
Cremers stated they would stay within the City Code
or request changes. He further outlined that Kraus -
Anderson mainly plans office buildings above County
Road I, with the commercial development along Highway
10 to possibly Include a food market, furniture store,
hardware, etc. Kraus -Anderson was not Interested
In fast food establishments because they like to
build and lease buildings.
6. PRELIMINARY CONCEPT
REVIEWAL P.U.D.
(continued)
MOUNDS ViVV PLANNING COMMISSION
Regular Meeting
Pe9e_5
March_121_IS80
------- .-----------------------------------------------------------
Skibe stated his concerns had been answered.
6. PRELIMINARY CONCEPT
REVIEWAL P.U.D.
McCarthy questioned the feasibility of the office
(continued)
buildings on the marginal land above County Road I.
Further, where would the existing ponded water drain to.
Boxrud, of Short -Elliott -Hendrickson, stated that the
area would drain to the lake and that there was capacity
for the 260 acre drainage district to meet the require-
ments of Resolution #983 with the Applicant's report.
McCarthy further questioned the control of Kraus -
Anderson over the land they might sell to another
developer.
Cremers stated that Kraus -Anderson would exercise the
controls of the final P.U.D. approval documents.
Glazer stated he could appreciate Kraus -Anderson's effort
In this two years of planning, but that this was the first
Planning Commission review. Glazer asked Cremers if
there was a need for elderly housing in Mounds View.
.remers stated he was under the belief that there was and
that financing could also be obtained. Glazer further
questioned whether or not we gain storage capacity comparing
the existing pond with the proposed one. Bo,.rud stated
that the City gains storage. Glazer then as'-.td if, with
the enlargement of the pond, the nutrient balance needs
would stay the same. Boxrud stated that he thought there
would be adequate vegetation around the perimeter of the
pond but that If the DNR or RCMD wanted more, the City
could just require less excavation in certain areas.
Further discussion centered around the need for open space
and the feeling that the proposed iske/pond met that
requirement.
Mountin questioned the feasibility of the s% aming beach.
Rose referred to S.E.H.'s report stating that there were
a number of factors. The final plan for the lake and
beach should be planned in the P.U.D. process. Boxrud
added that an additional study may be necessary, de-
pending on how the proposal is changed by outside
agencies. If at all.
Haake questioned the need for a beach with Spring Lake
so near. The zoning of the middle 22.9 residential
noted acres was asked. Cremers stated that he would
be willing to go medium density. Haake felt that at
this time maybe everything should be noted R-1.
Council member Forslund spoke and asked that the
Planning Commission give the Applicant direction so
that he can continue.
MUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION Regular Meeting
Page-6------------------------------------------------------------------ March_12 1280
Fedor asked what was being done about existing
drainage ditches. Rose replied that any existing
drainage facilities would be respected, modified
or improved, but that the system would continue to
work under the criteria of Resolution N983.
Burmeister asked if the swimming beach was a high
priority. Anderson stated It was. She further esked
Kraus -Anderson if the middle 22.9 acres could not have
a mixture of R-1 to R-3 uses. Cremers, for Kraus -
Anderson, stated he thought the tract was too small for
a good mlx.
Glazer asked if the pond was necessary regarding Resolu-
tion #983. Boxrud stated possibly not all of it. Glazer
then stated he would like to preserve the natural setting
as much as possible, to protect the water as It exists.
McCarthy asked what density Kraus -Anderson had planned
for the southwest corner. Cremers, for Kraus -Anderson,
stated single family dwellings. That they wanted to
protect and preserve the roiling chara:rer. McCarthy
also stressed the need for minimum access to existing
arterials and the use of an interior road system. Cremers
agreed that this was important and was in their plans.
McCarthy asked to what extent were Kraus -Anderson's lake
development plans; were they going to seed and provide
bank control? Cremers said that it was mandatory by
outside agencies.
Chairperson Mountin asked if there were any more
questions. There were none.
Haake presented the following motion, seconded by
Burmeister.
Whereas, the City has indicated its desire that
the s R=noown as Kraus-Anderson/Miner property be used
as mixed zoning, I.e., commercial, R-4, R-3, R-2 and
R-I; and
Whereas, the City desires to swap the park land
consisting oof 16.9 acres on the southwest corner to
the northwest corner and to acquire an additional pur-
chase of park land with L.A.W.C.O.N. funds; and
Whereas, the developer will satisy Resolution
No. 9 w t the development of Oak Park Lake; and
Whereas, the developer will adhere to a ring road
concept;
6. PRELIMINARY CONCEPT
REVIEWAL P.U.D.
(continued)
WE MAKE THE MOTION to recommend to the Council the
approve) of the Preliminary Concept Proposal as presented
MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION Regular Meeting
Page_7------------------------------------------------------------------- March-12,_1f80
PRELIMINARY CONCEP__1
REVIEWAL P.U.D.
(continued)
to us tonight. subject to the following stipulations
1. The establishment of a ring road, including
minimum curb cuts,with the financing of
improvements decided by the Council, such as
the improvements put in by the City and assessed
back to the developer via taxes.
2. That said lake would be developed as indicated
on Gerald Sunde's plat dated Feb. 19, 1980,
satisfying Resolution f983 and to satisfy
specifications from the regulating bodies.
3. That an acceptable cost be arrived at in the
development of the lake and an agreement as to
the maintenance of the lake.
4. That a land swap is undertaken for park purposes,
relocating the present 16.9 acres in the south-
west corner to the northwest corner, plus the
addition of acreage from L.A.W.C.O.N. finds in
the same site area.
5. That the proposed zoning of the southwest corner
be R-1 and the 22.9 acres be mixed residential.
6. That the land located north of County Road I
owned by Kraus -Anderson be fully approved by all
regulating agencies with guarantees that all
drainage will be controlled before any develop-
ment takes place on said parcel.
Discussion then occurred about the development of the
lake. Cremers was asked If the proposed plan of the lake
was required to be modified, would he agree to have it
done at no additional cost to the City. Cremers agreed,
as long as it did not change the number of cubic yards
of materials to be dug.
Fedor asked what density the developer would agree to
with regard to the 22.9 acres. Cremers stated 4 units
per acre of developable land.
Mountin stated she felt that definite density should
be part of the P.U.D. process. She also would like to
see the ONR and RCWD recommendations at the General
Concept Stage.
6.
Mountin offered amendments to the main motion, seconded
by Burmeister.
�r
I
MOUNDS
ViEW PLANNING COMMISSION
Regular
Meeting
Paye-B------------------------------------------------------------------
March
191_12S2
To add
the following:
6. PRELIMINARY
CONCEPT
REVIEWAL
P.U.D.
7.
The developer shall submit DNR and RCWD
(continued)
reviewals and recommendations to the
Planning Commission at their General Con-
cept Stage.
S. The Developer, upon completion of the
lake, shall dedicate it and the walkway
properties to the City.
9. That the park land "swap, dedication and
purchase" occurs before June 1st.
10. That the developer submit information
necessary for the EAW at the General
Concept Stage of the P.U.D. process.
Glazer questioned the need for specific densities.
Motion to amend main motion by Glazer, seconded
by Fedor.
To modify N5 of main motion to read as follows:
5. That the proposed zoning for the parcel
will be roughly as presented to us to-
night, with the southwest corner being
R-I and the middle residential designated
area will have no greater density th€..+ 4
units per acre of its developable land
The 3.0 acre area designated elderly mid -
rise will still be open to discussion.
Vote on second amendment. 5 ayes
2 nays
Burmeister voted nay because she wanted to con-
sider the densities at the Concept Stage.
Mountin agreed with that and also stated the
City did not have a zero lot line ordinance
which could affect those densities.
Vote on first amendment. 7 ayes
0 nays
Vote on main motion. 6 ayes
1 abstain
MOUNDS Y!C4 PLANNING COMMISSION Regular Meeting
Page_S------------------------------------------------------------------ March_Iss_1280
Glazer abstained because he felt there was not 6. PRELIMINARY CONCEPi—t
enough information about the pond. He would REVIEWAL P.U.Q.
like to have DNR and RCWD reports. He ieit (continued)
strongly about losing the natural drainage setting
unless it was proved to be necessary.
Rose reported that the applicant, John Miller, requested 7. MILLER INDUSTRIAL
the 'tanning Commissions input with regard to his PLAT - Sketch plan
sketch plan. The general location of his parcel -is reviewal - Major
north of New Trunk Highway 10 and south of County Road J. Subdivision (2 lots
The existing zoning is a combination of R-1, 8-2 and into 14) - Rezoning
1-1. The Comprehensive Plan had denoted the area (R-1 to 0-3 b 1-4,
Light Industrial. lie further noted that the Judicial 1-1 to 8-3)
Ditch 11 flowed through the property and that the
RCWD's initial review Indicated development could
occur above the 899.D elevation. Rose added that,
the RCWD was, however, reviewing that elevation for
potential change. The access proposed was a simple loop
in and out. MnDOT is presently reviewing this with their
plans for new Trunk Highway 10. The soils, as noted in
earlier reports, indicated limitations.
Miller, applicant for subdivision and rezonirl, intro-
duced himself and just asked that the Planning Commission
offer any direction they could which would help him plan
for the development of his plat. He required or requested
no motion.
Haake asked what specifically Miller has planned for
uses.
Miller stated he had nothing definite but that he would
stay within the limits of the zonings requested.
Fedor wanted to see further review by the DNR and RCWD.
Burmeister wanted to hear MnDOT's comments with regard
to how this fits into the relocation process.
Miller stated that he would modify to meet their
recommendations.
Glazer also wanted to see further review by ONR and
RCWD.
McCarthy discussed the soils and their limitations.
Gary Comstock, engineer for Miller, requested that the
Planning Commission offer direction to Miller with
regard to the sketch plan.
1 j t �
McViUM VI MIAT T
* 171 ao W, A&M
IM6.aolw uya
bi= FJK
J%kT[AhD AMN ArAKIMMV?
m unda
at��lo�r Con view
KMD TO: Mounds View Parks and Recreation Cotrniissioners
FROM: Staff
DATE: March 26, 1980
RE: Planning Update
Staff has been working closely with Mr. Gary Tushie during the past week to final-
ize the preliminary concept plans for each of our neighborhood parks. Because
of the delay in getting the aerial photos from Mark Hurd (recieved them Friday,
March 21, 1980) we will not be prepared to discuss the blob studies at Thursday's
meeting.
Staff has spoken with the City Council and would recommend that a joint meeting
be held with them at 6:30 p.m. on Monday, April 7, 1980. In addition staff would
recommend that the Park Courission schedule a special meeting or. Thursday,
April 3, 1980 to review the plans with Gary Tushie prior to Monday's meeting.
Staff acknowledge that Thursday, April 3, 1980 is Maundy Thursday and would welcome
an alternate proposal or suggestion. The plans would be available for review
for a Wednesday, April 2 meeting at the earliest.
Please review your schedules prior to Thursday so that a mutually agreeable schedule
can be attained.
DEMO TO: un s and Recreation Conmissioners
FROM: Sta
DATE: March 1980
RE: Satellite facilities
In response to the questions raised by the Coninission at the February 28, 1980
Cotrmission meeting, staff developed a survey which was sent to the surrounding
communities. The communities that were contacted were:
a.
Maple Grove
f.
Maplewood
b.
Arden Hills
g.
New Brighton
c.
Roseville
h.
Shoreview
d.
Fridley
i.
Golden Valley
3.
Spring Lake Park
j.
Robbinsdale
The results of the survey were as follows:
6-1
1. Eight out of the ten communities surveyed do provide bathroom facilities for
summer athletic programs. The facilities provided ranged froi a hrmms
at all sites to bathrooms for adult programs only.�i oreview
only provides satellites wherever there are summer playground activities.
2. Many of the communities surveyed had permanent bathroom facilities rather
than satellites or portable facilities. A breakdown of the types of facilities
provided is as follows:
Community
Permanent
Satellites
Maple Grove
8
1
Arden Hills
1
0
Roseville
9
6
Fridley
2
12
Spring Lake Park
2
a
Maplewood
2 (open days
only) e
New Brighton
4 (2 adult, 2
youth) 4
Robbinsdale
6 (closed due
to vandalism) 0
Shoreview
0
5
Golden Valley
12
3
3. In response to questions on vandalism the following was determined:
a. Maple Grove, Golden Valley and Arden Hills have attendants present at
all times when their blocilities are l"-t open.
b. Roseville leaves their facia open year ro d has experienced
tremendous vandalism rrQQbl 0••''
c. The most frequent prapl�li iel�:ed with sqVIRs (outside of ore
stolen and one blown u i a' pe bomb) is g war. Many of
Many cf the communities d that Lhey had all hat problem by
staking all four corners i lAtellite is w o o.
d. Robbinsdale h,= closed thei �fi nt facil ecause of the vandalism
problems and tree baseball ass 1Ifon no� 1 es'portable facilities.
4. Regarding the length of season that sYYVatellites' or bathrooms are available to
the public the following breakdown was determined:
17,
68fore you purchase a comfort station, you
should know exactly what you are gelling... and
what you fire not getting. Every Standard, High-
way, and Fairway Series Super Secur Comfort
Station Is sold with the some "package" of stand-
ard equipmai This "package" does not include
labor, and it does not Include any trills. It does
Include all the basic Items, all of it the finest
quality obtainable. The purchaser may specify
any amount of optional equipment, but the basic
"package" has all the components (except for
pleb and rough plumbing) needed for a complete,
vandal -resistant, low-maintena, ce, sanitary
Super Secur Comfort Stm!%i.
The basic Super Secur Comfort Station "Package" DOES Include:
• The engineered, factory-tabilrated steel c:ondorl station building,
knocked down.
s Unbreakable aluminum plumbing fixtures, Epoxiglaze'"-coated in white,
• Toilet stall partitions with doors.
s Tissue dispensers, surface -mounted or conroaled.
• Stainless Steel one-piece mirror for each lavatory.
■ Cast aluminum "MEN" and "WOMEN" signs.
in Flush valves, complete with vacuum breaker and angle stop.
• Filler valves for lavatories.
• Security fasteners for fixtures and mirrors.
• Anchor bolts for foundation.
• Sleeve jigs for fixture openings in foundation.
in Typical foundation drawings.
• Erection drawings.
• List of required tools.
■ Ali necessary nuts, bolts, and miscellaneous hardware.
Thr. basic Super Secur Comfort Station "Package" DOES NOT Include:
■ Concrete foundation Installation and material.
• Erection of the steel comfort station building.
■ Rough plumbing installation and material, including floor drains.
• Plumbing fixture installation.
• Stall partition installation.
• Priming and finish painting.
• heating and electrical installation and material,
in Shingles, shakes, wood nailem or ply,cord for gable -roof buildings.
Options.
■ Sliding aluminum sash Is available in lieu of wiro mesh sereen
at additional coat. Glazing Is %I Plexiglas"", Lexan'm or equal
with aluminum Insect screens over vents.
• Partition doors on men's side, and urinal screens.
• Entrance doors to rest rooms, keyed alike. Door closers available.
• Wall mounted vandal -resistant lights.
• Gable roof, water tight, 3" standing seam, metal -deck with scams
16- on centmr, .
REOUEST A COMPLUB /ROCMUIIR PNOM:
w e•Crnatd toll super linear Hera/alrC.
5Tms a
), Bob Klein, Dist. Mgr.
MIRACLE-JAMISON
RECREATION EOUIP.
2400 Westview Dr. 612 - 437-4525 AA
Hastings, Mn. 55033
SPECiFICARTV iONS F10"Ri ISSARmAX VVVA'EMRLEcSS ct 1IcwflNG3 TMETT SYSTEM:
r
(1) Fixtures (1, 2, 3. or 4 per system)
Toilets — vitreous china siphon jet, Teflon -coated bowls, bottom or rear discharge.
Flush tanks — close coupled, vitreous china Or remote stainless steel.
Urinals — Wall mounted, vitreous china, washout action
(2) Controls (One per system)
Individual contiul In a steal box for each system, low v,)lt;ytu control ;.ystern, counter in each box
records flushes: level indicalor in each box shows acciimtslated waste level is approaching pump -
down level. automatic shutdown prevents flushing if t, nk is full.
(3) Purification Unit (One cannister and one iodine dispPnsw per fixture!.
Slaulless steel 9" dia x 24" high cannister with chaico.,l filtrition, quick disconnect fittings; each unit
good for 10.000 uses. service exchange only; return d! , o,�nsf�rs and ('annisters for shop recharging.
(4) Storage!Separating Tnnk
500 gallon or 1,100 gallon usable waste r:npacity fir wf— r( I, i fiberglass construction with sump draw
tube and 3" quick coupling (standaid primp -down ho,. !;lt;rigy
Additional information:
Pumps and Motors: Located outside storage/separating tank in component section; the pump is self -
priming and close coupled; constant pressure; quick disconnect line fittings; motor is 120 volts, 8.83
amps, % hp, drip proof.
SARMAX Fluid: !Von -toxic, petroleum base, waterlike color, no unpleasant odor, flash point 225° F. pour
point — 40° F; sp. gray. approximately .8
Installation and Service: Normal plumbing and electrical skills, tools and materials by your contractor. Use
a trained vacuum truck operator for pump -down and cannister exchange.
IM1A it HLLSS FULL Ft USH IOIL LIS
BOB KLEIN A ASSOCIATES
Fork & 'levemund EgvipmoM
1[2,400 Westview Dr. 612 - 437-4525
Hastings, Mn. 55033
SARMAX WATERLESS FLUSHING TOILET SYSTEM
A conventional -appearing toilet receives the waste material which is flushed away utilizing
proprietary SARMAX fluid. The material enters a separation and storage tank capable of
handling up to four toilet fixtures. The waste material rapidly settles out, leaving the SARMAX
fluid on top. With each flush, the fluid is recovered and returned to the toilet tank through a pur-
ification unit. This SARMAX fluid recycling gods oti Flntil the storage tank is filled with waste
and must be emptied — after about 16.500 flushes for an 1,100 gallon tank.
The SARMAX system can operate in severe tempuialmer conditions. The system is easily
serviced, utilizing cannisters and quick connect and disconnect components. Recycling
non -aqueous fluid operates in a closed -loop circuit providing on -site handling of human
waste with zero discharge into the environment SARMAX flushing fluid is more hygienic
than flush water, containing properties that arrest h<ic lerlai growth
THE SARMA>, ;; 11A
Cir
lit
.........
ti
Nut sUSr.arF �.., j E.,
SARMAX SOLVES THESE PROBLEMS
No water or limited water at site.
Conventional sanitation unavailable.
Prohibition of septic tanks or soil qualities
which limit size of disposal beds.
Inadequate land for septic tank and dis-
posal system.
Failure of septic tanks or disposal beds.
Overloading of sewers and treatment plants.
Sewer or treatment plant moratoriums.
Stringent effluent standards.
SARMAX — PUBLIC APPLICATIONS
The SARMAX is operating successfully in national forests, national parks, ski resort areas and state highway
rest stops. Other applications include:
Picnic areas and campgrounds
Fire stations
f Dams
Utility service buildings
u Offices, factories, stores,
restaurants, motels
* Construction sites
v Beach^s
* Mines
• Sports arenas and stadiums
Guard stations
w Camps
Ar Military installations
w Fairgrounds and amusement
parks
1543
MEMO TO: Parks and Recreation mmis io r
FROM: Bruce K. Anderson, Di r_
DATE: March 26, 1980
RE: Monthly Update, March, 1980
The purpose of this report is to keep the Parks and Recreation
Commission informed on current issues within the Parks,
Recreation and Forestry Department that don't need official
Commission action.
Mounds View Appreciation Dinner - The Mounds View Appreciation
Dinner is slated for Saturday, March 29, 1980, beginning with
cocktails at 5:30 PM at the Bel Rae Ballroom. The cost for
tickets is $8.00/person and they can be purchased up until
Friday, March 28, 1980, at Mounds View City Hall.
Student Intern - Jeff Stottlemyer has successfully completed his
internship with the City of Mounds View with plans to graduate
in May of this year. Staff is now working out the final details
for bringing in a new intern for this coming summer from the
University of Wisconsin - LaCrosse. Colleen Wilson will be
graduating this summer with a B.A. degree in Parks and Recreation
Administration. Colleen's emphasis is in municipal recreation
and she is interested in developing additional programming skills.
Her main responsibility will be with Mary and coordinating the
summer recreation programs.
Festival in the Park - The date for the 1980 Festival in the
Park has been changed to Sunday, July 20, 1980, as the Ramsev
County showmobile was not available on July 13. Mary has been
working very closely with the Festivities Commission and I
have enclosed a list of programs we have proposed to run.
Frisbee Golf - We purchased ($225.00) a new frisbee golf hole
that will be used at each of our summer playground sites, as
well as at the Festival in the Park. staff will be giving a
brief demonstration on Thursday.
After School Program a Success - The after school program that
we presented n conceptual form last month is now successfully
drawing to a close. All eight sessions were run as scheduled
with over 175 children currently enrolled.
Wood Pile Sur��ve - City Forester Jack Shields has been out actively
c eck ng woodpiles since March 1, 1980. Jack is mainly concerned
with diseased elm and oak as it must be de -barked from March I -
July 1 of each year. Staff is convinced that our rigorous
enforcement program has been the major factor in the reduction of
our elm and oak trees in the City.
BKA/sa
if 0 OUh Sview
�4ttAMS(Y COUNTY, MINNESOIA
2401 HIG44WAY 10
MOUNDS VtEW,MINN, WI.
OE PARTMENT OF PAScS, 764-1055
RECREATION AND FONLST P�
MEMO TO: Coltcen Wc.fun, Student Intehn
FROM: Matey KvaZheim, Pughum Supetvi.aon
DATE: McAch 17, 1980
RE: Summer InUAnbhip
The 6ottowing menu outline,& you& ovehatt goa.f and goat objeexives bon your
inteanakip with Mound+ View PaAka, ReeheatiOn 6 Fohe,&thy Department as devel-
oped betwen you and I du.ing out Maneh 14, 1980 meeting.
Goat: To eAtabtiah a wett-hounded d,ield a�ohk expeni.enee .in .the ucuation
and panda phodeaa.ion concentota.ti ng especial. y on .the many baceta o6
Pakb and Reateation adminiatnation.
I. Objective - To gain .ina.ight in parks devetopment
A. Attend the Pahks and Recr.tat.ion Commi44 ion meetings, aeheduted to
be hetd:
Thuuday, May 21
• Thuuday, June 26
Thauday, Juty ?I
a Give a upon on phogham invotvement at .the June and Juty meet.inga.
B. Accompany the DiAectnn to on -site }wkb devetopment pwj'ecte .in an
attempt to dottow and abbe,&,& pu ect aecempt"hmentb, phobteme, and
neaaona Don ptanni.ng and devetopment dec."ionb.
C. A"iAt ,the ViAectoh .in any lm)tke devetopment wohk as hequasted.
II. Objective - Participate in .the many duties o6 phoviding a eomphehenbive
community Recheati.on phoghaM.
A. Participate in the hieing o6 Faff activities phogham pant -.time sta66•
S. Keep 6inanaiat budget neeohda v6 the aummeA got,& and tenn.i,6 Cta,&,&eb.
C. Supenv"e the aumwA gots and tennis paoghama:
1} handte ata66 time-Aheeta
t } handle par. eipant clans tin is
3} handtt daciti,ty pehmit,&
�} handte paktcc�ai nt euatuations
S} handte .imttucto)t evaluattow
6} handte equipment needs
7} otheh neee,&aWty dul#ita
III. Objective - Provide a ♦w mK4 playground ata66 visiting workshop
11aRch 1 r, 19a0 Page !
A. Attend the votunteer C04Chea wonhAhop Satmday, May 11 and aaai4t
the Program SuWvc.4or and Youth Athletic Diectoh as nequeated.
8. Attend .the AI.R.P.A. Playground Leadvuhip Workshop June 13.
C. Ptan and implement the 4ummer playground Leaden training &w,%kehop,
June 14, math the aa.iatanee o6 .the. Prngrnm Supervc4or.
IV. Objective - Coordinate .the Summer playground Special TA.ips program.
A. Contract " aervicea
B. Con6inm taip date.a, tlme4 and casts with agenci.ee.
C. Provide .in6o4mati.on 6or the tende4z.
D. Provide etae4 tists 6o4 Leaders.
E. Other necessary dati" .
V. Objective - Attend the Mid-Se"on Adu"- Athlettia Manager4 meeting and
aa4i6t the Program Supenv.ieor as requested.
VI. Objective - Ptan and .implement a Speciae Event 6or .the pool program.
A. Meet with .tile 4wim eta66 and ext)eai i .the program.
B. Detegate dutiee to 4to66
C. Ptov.ide 6tyer4, equipment, awa,7ds and o#hen.
D. Pubt.ieize and evaluate .the program.
VII. Objective - Fatt Brochure Development
A. Send out a bid apeei6ieation bon brochure printing serviee,s.
B. Us b t in the pYanning o 6 Faff activities.
C. A44i4t in the Lay -out o6 the brochure.
D. Aaa-i.at in .the malting p4oee.a4 e6 .the brochure.
VIIl. Objective - Devetop an overvitw o6 the geneAal day to day opeAations o6
a wunicipat NAke and RecAcation Depa2tm ott.
A. Work 6or a minimum o6 one bull day with the City Park maintenance
enew and the Community Education Department.
B. Attend the 6ottowing rrweting4 oo a regulate baa iA : Park4 and Recuation.
CorwiWion, Community Education AdviAcAy Council, M.R.P.A. Recreation
Section meeting4, Senior Advienry meetings, Sunr.iAe Senior,a meeting4,
febtivity Commi44ion meetings and othe.r.s.
cc. Ikuce K. Andewn, D.ihectur, PaiU, Rec.Zvation B Foresthy
Ah. Rood
Dr. Hartman
Dr. Otto
• SAUCER
• SAUCER
• SAUCER
• SAUCER
• SAUCER
• SAUCER
GAMES PACKET
Enjoy the challenge of controlling the
flight of the flying saucer.
The Sauer Golf Games Packet has been
designed to develop both fundamental
and advanced skills.
STRAIGHT PITCH
CURVE PITCH
SPIRAL PITCH
CIRCLE PITCH
GAME
BASKETS
SAUCER GOLF RULES
The games are rated according to
difficulty with * being the easiest
and* *A *the most difficult.
Saucer Game
Fach player starts the game with 6 letlers Ihat sTwil the word S A lJ C l: l% A letter is taken awayeach time a player does not
complete the Saucer Golf hole from the exact location tit an nplxnrnt'�. � � impli,Ied Ihrcnv. Completing the Saucer Golf hole
means tho: the saucer has come to rest in the basket, A player is elinnnatrrJ f:nm the game whenall6letters have been taken
away,
Throwing Order -A player continues to choose the throwing location as long as the We is completed in one throw, The
right In choose throwing local Join is lost when an mconilOuIe Ili row is ma+It, I hp a saucer to fire whnchunses the lirst thruwirg
location.
Variation - The grip and delivery style acid throwing Itx:mion of an oplxittoiI's compl, red throw must be duplicated or
o letter is lost,
QSIUCER
Lf�INC. 7533 W.h+ngmn Avo So, Mone.pol+a, MN 55435
Phone 617; 94 t-2044
M Meter
• Saucer
Straight Pitch
Starting at position 1 and continuing consec u
lively to position 10, each player nukes 10thtow.,
1 throw at each position.
SCOR671fG—A point is scored when the saucer
comes to rest in the basket of the Saucer Coll
hole. Maximum score is 10 points or 1 point per
position. High score wins. Per is 5 points.
VARIATION —Play the basic Straight Pitch game with a different scoring
system. Points are awarded according to throwing position nun+lxcr. Yor
example, scoring throws Isee definition ab(we) from position 8 (8 points)
and position 6 (6 points) and position 2 (21x)ints) and misses at ail die other
positions would result in a score of 8 + 6 + 2 = 16. Maximum score is 55
points. Par is 15 points.
rM t[Y 7M " WHIM" W I M
rostTtoN
1 2 i s s s 7 a 10
Saucer
Spiral Pitch
(INDOORa)
(OUTDOORS)
IM • iM• am - taa•
w _ se•
aM-10
TM - E1
W
The gams is Straight Pitch in a slightly
different form antd M etlpK*lly chaUerging
outdoor wbert the wind is bowing. Refer to
the SrrtoW Pinch genre for scoring and vari•
arion.
/ / 1 5"
aEO1NNER - 1 IW
\ INTERMEDIATE _ ADVANCED
Saucer
Circle Pitch . * . •
Saucer '
Curve Pitch
Pkiceanobstacle,atleast 1.5rnetershigh, J
between the hole and the thr< wing position,
1 meter from the hole. Each pi.,_ -�r makes 4
throws per turn and 4 turns per v ound.
SCORING —in the following manner:
5 points saucer comes to rest in the
basket of the Saucer Golf We.
3 points - saucer hits the upper or lower
cone or the top dome.
i point . saucer hits the pule.
Maximum score is 80 points. Par is 40 points.
VARIATION —Change the placement of
the obstacle by moving it further from the
hole in incremerds of 1 meter.
There are six throwing positions l<xated around the Saucer Golf hole. Start•
ing at position I and continuing consecutively to position 6, each player
makes 2 throws at each position using the delivery style listed.
SCORING —Use the S - 3 - 1 evades described above in the Ctatnw
Pitch game. Maximum score is 60 points. Par is 30 points.
dtlt DIAMETER
ISM RADIUa
s / t
s �OYEf1rtA1A _ � � N<CKN410 r
MIIgT
VARIATION —
Change the dlstarx e t s
between the hole a,,d
the throwing J*1101, v
j
n
Saucer
Baskets
M Meter
r r
GOAL AREA
still DIAMETER
PLAYERS
5 members per team.
TIME
Two 20 minute halls, run•
ping time. Titres outs after
every score, out of bounds
and foul. The clock ,` +rts up
again (time in) when the
saucer comes back into the
field of play. Two 60 second
time outs per team per half.
OBJECT ......... Score points by throwing the saucer and having it r ov i e to rest in tlse basket of the Saucer Golf Hole.
Highest score wins
SCORING ....... 2 points are scored on throws from the field or court, I point is scored for each free throw made.
PLAY ............ The 119G Frisbee disc is the official size and weight saucer to be used. Choice of either throw -off or
defending a hole is determined by a flip of the saucer. 1'earns switch ends to start the second half and
the team that received the first half throw -off starts the second half by throwingofl. The play starlswith
both teams on opposite end lines. One team throws the saucer at the Saucer Goff Hole, starting the
time clock, and play continues until a time (rut occ ors. After mach score from the field and the second
throw, if made, of a two free throw foul, the learn scored against starts play again by throwing the
saucer over their defensive end line. Out of bounds throws are brought back into the field of play at the
point where the saucer left the held of play.
RULES ........... A) Catching: Players may catch the saucer with r one or two hands or by trapping it against the body.
No catch is ruled it the saucer is touching the ground and complete control or possession is not present,
B) Throwing: The saucer may be thrown in any direction with the following restrictions:
1. Legal Fliglnte: single skip and all other types of nights that do not touch the ground.
2. Illegal Fligbte: any flights other than single skip that come in contact with the ground.
C) Change of Poaseosion: The saucer will automalically change possession under the following
conditions:
1. incomplete throw: an illegal throw (see rule 13.2 ),a dropped throw between teammates, an
out of bounds throw, a throw intercepted by the opposition will result in a change of possession at
the point where the throw was incomplete.
2. 3 Step: the player in possession of the saucer may take up to 3 steps before having to stop and
establish a pivot foot. Once the pivot fotil is established additional steps are not permitted and a
change of possession will occur if the pivot foot moves an additional step.
3. Out of Botistda: a throw that lands out of bounds or a player in possessionot the saucer having
one foot on or outside the out of hounds line will result in a change of possession.
4. Goal Area: an offensive player(s) in the oflorr rve goal area will result in a changeof possession.
5. Half Court Line: the team in possession of I he saucer has 10 seconds to move the saucer past
the center line and into the offensive zone, and the s,%ucer must be kept in the offensive zone or a
change of possession will occur.
D) Fouls: a foul by either team will result in a free throws) being taken. Fouts are tailed for the
following reasons:
I. Body contact: the player who initiates 1xxfy contact of any type will he charged with afoul. Two
free throws will be awarded the fouled player.
2.Goal Area: a defensive player is allowed in I he defensive goal area only if the flying saucer has
come to rest on the ground. A one throw free throw will be awarded when a defensive player enters
the defensive goal area and the saucer has not tonne to rest in the goal area.
E) Fsee Thrown: a free throw is awarded when a foul occurs. Play stops immediately (time out)
when a foul is called. The free throw is taken from behind t1w center court line and all player, except
the Ihrowcr, line up on the end line where the It" throw is being made. Players wip line up on the end
line in an alternate way, IW is there wtl be a player from learn A, a player from team B. a player from
team A, a player from team B. etc. The saucer is txtt in play after the first of a two free throw, urim M
the tree throw is not made the saucer belonps to the first player to gain possession after the n*&. The
saucer mum leave the hand of tM player making the tree thuow before players on the end tine can nw in.
F) sin"Mtewe Poseeoefow: In the event of simull aneous possession by opposing players, the
saucer will be awarded to the offensive team.
SAv ER
cot .INC.
?W *ASNwNO!aN AVE SO M.NNEAYa 110% M YN! S •'41�J.N
SAUCER GOLF RULES
OR,iECT OF GAME ........... Saucer Golf is modeled after the game of ball golf. The object of Saucer Golf
is to complete the course in as few throws as possible. Count one point each
time a penalty is assessed and each time the flying saucer is thrown.
TEE THROWS ................. When starting play on a Saucer Golf hole the player must release the saucer
between, behind, and not more than 2 meters behind the starting markers. A
penalty is assessed if the throw is not made within the boundaries described.
PUTT THROWS ............... When throwing the saucer within 8 meters of the Saucer Golf hole the player
must have one foot (plant -foot) resting on the location where the previous
throw came to rest while placing the other foot no closer than the plant
foot. The player is not permitted, under penalty of one point, to move either
foot closer to the hole until the saucer hits or goes beyond the hole.
ALL OTHER THROWS ........ The player must establish foot placement per the putting rule, but, the feet
can move closer to the hole after release of the saucer.
'J
UNPL.AYASM L.IE ............ A saucer resting more than 1 meter above the ground is ruled unplayable and
a penalty assessed. After an unplayable lie is ruled, the player establishes the
plant foot on the ground directly beneath where the unplayable lie occurred.
NOTE: A saucer resting less than one meter above the ground is playable
and the plant foot must rest at the point where the previous throw carve
to rest.
om OF sOUNDS ............ Public roads, private property, andwater hazards (except casual water) are
HAZA 8 are out of bounds and a penalty is assessed when a saucer comes to rest in
the out of bounds area. The saucer is brought back into play wham it first
went out of bounds.
ETNp JEM ................... The player farthem from the Saucer Golf hole always throws first in a group,
raDrtiess of score.
Do not disturb other players when they are throwing.
Do not throw until the players around you are out of range.
Yad "FORE" it your throw is going to come now or hit another player.
f
LpC/%, K)M ................ Local conditions may enlarge the scope of the out of bounds and hazards
rule as well as other aspects of play on the course. Local rules should be
posted at the firm tee.
Actt.v.t.Uea doh "Fe Uvat in the t'PAW-
~ Sunday, July 13,f1980
1) Baseball Exhibition Carmen (Youth, Parents) all afternoon
2) Croquet Tournament (Seniors) all afternoon
3) Horseshoe Tournament (Adult) all afternoon
4) Volleyball Tournament (Adult, Teens) all afternoon
5) Races S Relays (Yuuth) I:00 p.m.
6) Penny Scramble (Tots) 2:00 p.m.
7) Puppet Wagon (Tots, Youth) 2:15 P.m.
8) Pie -eating Contest (Youth) 5:00 p.m.
9) Disc Frisbee Activity (Adult, Youth) all afternoon
10) Bicycle Rodeo (Youth) I2:00 noon
11) Bocce Ball (Adult, Seniors) all afternoon
12) Hoole Hoop Content (Youth, Teens) 2:30
13) Jr. Frisbee Contest (Youth, Teens) 3:00
14) Yo-Yolympica (Youth.Teens) 3:30
15) Costume Contest (Tots, Youth) 4:00
16) Stuffed Animal Show (Tots, Youth) 4:30
s?) PA #Nr A FA e f
Palk S Recneati.on Vepal.tment wilt aecaAe:
1) T-Shirts
2) Popcorn Supplies
3) Bingo Cards
4) Satelites
5) Flyers i Brochure Article 6 New Brighton Bulletin Articles
Sumested Performers:
1) Storytalers
2) Duck Soup
01I-A111MI NT OP I'AhKS,
nEC:REATION AND FORESTRY
May 1, 1980
if of vounjgV!ew
RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA
2401 HIGHWAY 10
MUUNDS VIEW, MINN- 55117
79 -3055
Dear Parks and Recreation Commissioners:
Enclosed is your packet of information for the May 1, 1980 Parks and
Recreation Commission meeting. The major issue that we have before
us this evening is the development and upgrading of the Edgewood Jr.
High School/Park Site. It is staffs desire to bring this issue before
the City Council at their regularly scheduled May 12, 1980 meeting.
In addition it should be noted that the City Council has appointed
myself as the Acting City Administrator during the interim between
-�_ the hiring of a new administrator. My reason for making note of this
is that the "double duty" may necessitate an occassional late packet
or delayed memo to the Park Commission. I would appreciate your
understanding and patience on these items if if should become a problem,
but hopefully it will be the exception rather than the rule.
Si ereI i
Bruce K. nders Director
Parks, on and Forestry
BKA/sw
Enclosure