Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Agenda Packets - 1986/11/10
CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW NOVEMBER 10, 1986 7:n0 P.M. �^ AGENDA 1. Call to Order 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Roll Call - Quick, IIankner, Haake, Blanchard, Linke 4. Approval of Minutest October 27,1986 Recular Meeting (Received in 11-03 Packet) 5. Public Bearings: 7:05 p.m. - Super America Conditional Use Permit 6. Residents Requests and Comments From The Floor CITIZENS:- --------- BEFORE. SPEAKING P!.EASE GIVE. YOUR FULL NAME 1 AND ADDRESS FOR THE MINOTES -------------------------------------------------------- 7. Approval of Consent Agenda ITEM A. Authorize Payment of $1,879 to Sprinq Lake Park -Blaine -Mounds View Fire Departm:,nt from Contingency Account for City's Share of Revenue Shortfalls ITEM B. Authorize Public Works/Community Development Director to Advise MnDOT of City's Desire Not To Purchase 1.63 Acre Parcel of Right -Of -Way ITEM C. Authorize Public Works/Community Development Director. to Advise Ramsey County of City's Acceptance of Red Oak Drive Turn Back ITEM D. Authorize Mayor to Enter into Planning Assistance Loan Agreement with Metropolitan Council ITEM E. Appoint Eric P. Saunders to the Planning Commission for a Four Year Term Commencing January 1, 1987 ITEM F. Adopt Resolution No. 2124 Approving Just and Correct Claims Against City Funds AGENDA NOVEMBER 10, 1986 PAGE TWO ITEM G. Licenses for Approval A�ha1t - Expires 6/30 87 Blacktop Paving of Minnesota - New G. W. Holm Company - New General - Expires 6/30 87 Metro Manufactured Home Service - New Solomon and Sons - New Wetterlund and Son Construction - New 8. Adopt Resolution No. 2121, Resolution of Commendation and Appreciation to Matt Rowley 9. Adopt Resolution No. 2123, Resolution of Commendation and Appreciation to Greg Rowley 10. First Reading of Ordinance No. 415 An Ordinance Amending the Municipal Code of Mounds View By Amending Chapter 40 Entitled, "Zoning" 11. Second Repding'and Adoption of Ordinance No. 414 An Ordinance Adopting the 1986 Long -Term Financial Plan 12. Consideration of Resolution No. 2125 Regarding Super America Gas Station 13. Consideration of Resolution No. 2126 Regarding Scope of Environmental Impact Statement for JLN Development 14. Report of Public Works/Community Development Director 15. Report of Attorney 16. Report of Councilm^mberss Quick, Hankner, Haake, Blanchard, Linke (Proclama- tion) 17. Report of Administrator 18. Adjournment �ta.r 5 ''05 PM 1 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE, IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Mounds View City Council will meet on Monday, November 10, 1986, at 7:05 p.m. at Mounds View City Hal?, 2401 Highway 10, Mounds View, Minnesota, 55112 to consider the request of Kraus -Anderson (Super America) for a conditional use permit for the southwest corner. of Trunk highway 10 and County Road I, legally known as: PART OF LOT_ 1 BEG AT MOST NLY COR OF SO LOT L TH SELY ALONG NF.LY LINE OF SD LOT 1 235 FT TH S 41 DEG 30 MIN 27 SEC W 293.8 FT TH S 13 DEG 55 MIN 50 SEC W 53.55 FT TO SLY LINE OF SO LOT 1 TH WLY ALONG SD SLY LINE 34.01 FT TH N 13 DEG 55 MIN 50 SEC E 83.5 FT TH N 42 DEG 8 MIN 39 SEC W 253.23 FT TO NLY LINE. OF SD LOT 1 TH ELY ALONG SD NLY LINE 265.69 FT TO BEG The purpose of this hearing is to renew the conditional use permit for the Super America gas station/convenience store at Trunk Highway 10 and County Road I because they did not start construction within one year of City Council approval. The zoning for this site proper for this use.. Therefore, deny the conditional use permit maets all of the conditions. is B-3, Highway Business, and is the City Council cannot legally application if the applicant Anyone desiring to be heard with reference to this matter, may be heard at this meeting. Donald F. Pauley Clerk -Administrator (New Brighton Bulletin: October 29, 1986) ie,M: 7iman Jnhn D. Duck F.t At Ixuu1ld &'11KII.th Miegel Marjor 2600 Take CO'•n"t Drive Mounts Vicw 7. Drive I,2.4 rake Court Drive Mounts Vicw, MN 55432 "binds ;:iew, MN 55432 Mounds View, lim 55411, as L. Neitzel Drank J. Delmont Et Al Ik9)orah L. Lalenle 2 Iake Court Drive 2580 Wounds View UYive 2620 Iake Court Drive ,ands View, hIM 55432 Mounts View, MN 55432 Mounds View, MI1 55432 .a Laura Block Verna M. Melius John E. Were 2608 Lake Court Drive. 2582 Mounds Vicw Drive 2632 Lake Court Drive Mounds View, W 55432 Mounds View, MN 55432 Mounds View, PIA 55432 Lance J. miygor Dawn Johnson Mr. Robert A. Ilinote 2584 Mound• Vied Drive 2634 lake Court Drive 2610 take Court Drive Mounds Vicw, MN 55432 Pbunds tried, MN 55432 Mounds View, MN 55432 Robert J. Wagner. Arden G. W9ahlberg loberta D. Rein err 2590 Mounds ViAa Drive 2642 Lake Court Drive 2614 Jake Court Drive Mourr's View, '4N 55432 Mounds View, I1r1 55432 MoWs View, MN 55432 Lawrence Reding Et Al John A. & Kathleen Erickson 2592 I•bunds Vic4 Drive Jeffrey S. Pinotti 2644 Lake Court Drive 2566 Moun s View Drive Mounds View, MN 55432 Mounds View, .1N 55432 surds View, MN 55432 John A. Pbeller, Jr. Linda A. Paul 2588 Mounds Vicar Drive Leona Johnson 2646 Lake Court Drive 2570 pounds View Drive Pounds Vied, M 55432 Mounds View, MN 55432 +lauds view, PIN 55432 Sara L. Colleen C. W915 Geraldine L. Sisto eCourt 2622 IakCt Drive 2574 Mounds View Drive 2594 Pbunls View Drive hbunnds View, HI 55432 Mounds View, mm 55432 Pounds View, Pod 55432 Mary A. Blackstone Robert Iiolmneck 2596 Founds View Drive Joseph Masanz 2626 Iake Court Drive 2578 Mxuds View Drive pounds View, MN 55432. Mounds View, !el 55432 ,bunts View, '21 55432 John S. Iarson 2569 ^sounds View Drive hounds View, Pod 55432 Daniel P. & Lisa L. Padanv 2572 ^bums View Drive Mounds view, aw 55432 Charles A. Wdilken 2616 take Court Drive Mounds View, ni 55432 Leona F. Peterson 2.618 Iake Court Drive hounds View, Ill 55112 ^l a r. a,vur,a 523 Sth Street South Hi.nneapolis, MN 55404 %%WIN If. ANDERSON CONST. 8901 Lyrdale Avenue South Bloomington, FIN 55420 BURGER KING, 01). P.O. Box 520703 Miami, FL 33152 Mr. Robert W. 6 Carole Raes 7715 Eastwood Road YrAmds View, I4N 55432 Ole L. 6 Eleanor Bacon 2625 highway 10 Mounds View, IMN 55112 WUNDS VIEW %PRE OORP. 2227 University Avenue St. Pau]., MN 55114 K.A.C. INi7EMM' IM 1400 Vine Center 4bder Lexington, KY 40593 mmus VIEW RESIDENCE, INC. C/0 Wildwood mnor 2559 "hunds Vied Drive Mounds View, MN 55432 Cityy of 14ounds View 2401 highway 10 14ounds ViP.w, MN 55112 Att'n: Barb Collins ■ ■ Y M 7 —, _ -- - ...... r CONSENT AGENDA NOVEMBER 10, 1986 The Consent Agenda is a technique designed to expedite handling of routine and miscellaneous official business of the City Council. The entire agenda may be adopted by the Council in one motion. The motion for adoption is non - debatable and must receive unanimous approval. By request of any individual Councilmember, an item can be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed upon the Regular Agenda for debate. ITEM A. Authorize Payment of $1,879 to Spring Lake Park -Blaine -Mounds View Fire Department from Contingency Account for City's Share of Revenue Shortfalls ITEM B. Authorize Public Works/Community Development Director to Advise MnDOT of City's Desire Not To Purchase 1.63 Acre Parcel of Right -Of -Way ITEM C. Authorize Public Works/Community Development Director to Advise Ramsey County of City's Acceptance of Red Oak Drive Turn Back ITEM D. Authorize Mavor to Enter into Planning Assistance Loan Agreement with Metropolitan Council ITEM E. Appoint Eric P. Saunders to the Planning Commission for a Four Year Term Commencing January 1, 1987 ITEM F. Adopt Resolution No. 2124 Approving Just and Correct Claims Against City Funds ITEM G. Licenses for Approval Asphalt - Exoires 6/30/87 Blacktop Paving of Minnesota - New G. W. Holm Company - New General - Expires 6/30/87 Metro Manufactured Home Service - New Solomon. and Sons - New Wetterlund and Son Construction - New �Gyyl MEMO TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: CLERK-ADMINISTRATO DATE: NOVEMBER 3, 1986 SUBJECT: PLANNING ASSISTANCE LOAN AGREEMENT Attached for your information is the loan agreement between the Metropolitan Council and the City of Mounds View for the $15,000 Planning assistance loan approved by the Metropolitan Council. After reviewing the agreement I find that it is consistent with the conversations I have had with the Metropolitan Council staff and we recommend Council authorize the Mayor to enter into said agreement. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Council authorize Mayor to enter into loan agreeement between the Metropolitan Council and City of Mounds View for a $15,000 interest -free planning assistance loan. DFP/mjs Attachment: Metropolitan Council 300 Metro Square Building Seventh and Robert Streets St. Haul, Minnesota 55101 Telephone (612) 291.6359 October 29, 1986 Donald F. Pauley Clerk -Administrator City of Mounds View 2401 Highway 10 Mounds View, MN 55112 Dear Don1 I have enclosed the loan agreement between the Metropolitan Council and the city of Mounds View. Before signing it, please note the following dates as indicated in the agreement: - The Midpoint Report is due July 1, 1987. - The Final Progress Report is due July 1, 1980. - The loan will be repaid in three equal amounts of $5,000 each, on December 1 of 1987, 1988 and 1989. If you have any problem with these dates, please contact me immediately. Also, Section 2.B. of the contract references Appendix B, which is to contain the work program. The city of Mounds View's application did not include a final work program. A final work program must be submitted before the contract can be signed by the Council. Please submit it when you return the enclosed contract. I look forward to receiving the signed agreement and final work program at your earliest convenience. Sincerely, Lucy Thompson G�2. Loan Program Coordinator LT/de Enclosure An Fqual appodunily Fniploye, Contract No. L-86- LOAN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL AND THE CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW THIS AGREEMENT, entered into this day of 1986 by and between the Metropolitan Council, hereinafter referred to as the "Council," and the City of Mounds View, hereinafter referred to as the "Lendee." WHEREAS, the Council is required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 473.851, et. seq., to administer the Metropolitan Land Planning Act, hereinafter referred to as the "Act," which requires local governmental units within the Metropolitan Area to prepare comprehensive plans; and WHEREAS, the Council is required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 473.867, to establish a planning assistance fund to assist local governments in carrying out planning activities and to adopt uniform procedures for the award, disbursement and repayment of grants and loans; and WHEREAS, the Lendee has applied to the Council for a loan to be used for a detailed, comprehensive review of the Lendee's comprehensive plan, zoning code, sub i-Ision regulations and other policies, rules and regulations pertaining to development within the city; and WHEREAS, the Council desires to assist the Lendee in doing a comprehensive review of the Lendee's comprehensive plan and official controls. OTHEREFORE, g funds tothee Lende�andothedLendee'�soagreement tof the lag reement and Lendee agree as follows: I. Amount and Loan Guidelines A. The Council shall pay to the Lendee a total loan amount of $15,000. The total amount of loan funds shall be made available to the Lendee upon execution of this Loan Agreement. B. Tho Lendee agrees to comply with all provisions of the Metropolitan Council 1985-1987 Local Planning Assistance LoanGuidelines, as amended, hereinafter referred to as the "Loan Guidelines" which is hereby incorporated by reference into this Loan Agreement and made a part hereof. P. Authorized Use of Loan Proceeds A. It is understood and agreed that the following costs and expenses shall be the only such costs and expenses paid for out of loan proceeds. Costs and expenses to be reimbursed shall additionally be in substantial accord with specifications contained in the Lendee's loan application and other provisions contained herein. The following costs specifically incurred in carrying out the planning activities specified in the funded portion of the work program shall be payable from loaned amounts. I. Compensation of existing staff. 2. Compensation of newly hired staff. -2- 3. Employment of a qualified consultant(s). 4. Payment of other costs such as overhead, rental of space and equipment, purchase of supplies, printing and publishing. B. The Lendee shall utilize the loan funds to carry out the activities specified in the funded portion of the work program set forth in Appendix B, attached hereto and made a part hereof. C. The Lendee agrees that no more than 75 percent of the total cost of carrying out the work program set forth in Lendee's application for loan assistance, Appendix A, attached hereto and made a part hereof, shall be financed by loan funds. 3. Accounting A. The Lendee agrees to establish and maintain accurate and complete accounts and records relating to the receipt and expenditure of any and all loan funds including, but not limited to, documentation and information relating to the selection and payment of consultants. B. The above documents and records of the Lendee shall be audited by the Lendee in the same man:ar as all other accounts and records of the Lendee are audited, and may be audited and/or inspected on Lendee's premises or otherwise by individuals or organizations designated and authorized by the Council at any time following reasonable notification during the loan period, and for a period of three years following final loan payment. 4. Reports A. Midpoint Report. Lendee shall prepare and deliver a midpoint report by letter notifying she Council that the activities undertaken in connection with loan assistance are half completed. The report shall contain a shcrt description of the utilization of loan funds, projected future planning expenses and any anticipated problems in meeting completion dates. The report is due July 1, 1987. B. Final Progress Report. The Lendee agrees that upon completion of the total work program, the Lendee will submit to the Council a final progress report which shall be evaluated by the Council to determine that: 1) The planning costs funded by this loan did not exceed 75 percent of the total cost of the work program. 2) The scope of work was completed. 3) The terms of this Loan Agreement were met. The final progress report is due July 1, 1988. 5. General Conditions A. Duration. The period of loan award specified herein shall commence on the execution of this agreement and remain in force and effect until December 1, 1989. -3- B. Repayment. The Lendee agrees to repay the Council in accordance with the following schedule: 1. The Lendee will remit to the Council on or before December 1, 1987 an initial payment of $5,000. 2. The Lendee will remit to the Council on or before December 1, 1988 a second payment of $5,000. 3. The Lendee will remit to the Council on or before December 1, 1989 a final payment of $5,000. C. Breach. In the event that the Council finds that there has been a failure to comply with the provisions of this Loan Agreement, the Lendee agrees to repay to the Council funds not used in accordance with this Loan Agreement. These tunds shall be repaid at an interest rate of 8 percent per year, compounded annually, from the date of the act which was in breach of this Loan Agreement. In addition, the Council reserves the right to take whatever action it deems necessary to protect its interests in the event of a breach by the Lendee. D. Changes. The terms of this Loan Agreement may be changed or modified by mutual agreement of the parties hereto. Such changes or modifications shall be effective only upon the execution of written amendments signed by authorized representatives of the Council and Lendee. E. The Lendee agrees to comply with all applicable laws relating to nondiscrimination, affirmative action, and public purchase, contracting and employment. In particular, Lendee agrees not to discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, sex or national origin, and to take affirmative action to ensure that applicants and employees are treated equally with respect to the following: employment, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment, layoff, termination, rates of pay and other forms of compensation, and selection for training. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed on the day and year first above written by their authorized representatives. Approved as to legal METROPOLITAN COUNCIL form By_ Assistant Counsel Donald D. Carroll, Deputy Executive Director LENDEE By Title LOANAG APPENDIX A METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 1985-87 APPLICATION FOR LOCAL PLANNING ASSISTANCE LOAN 1. Name of Community: City of Mounds View 2. Name of Local Contact Person: Donald F. Pauley, Clerk — Administrator Address: 2401 Highway 10 Mounds View, Minnesota 55112 Telephone: (612) 784-3055 3. Description of Proposed Project The City of Mounds View proposes to undertake a detailed, comprehensive review of the City's Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Code, Sutdivision Regulations, and any other City policies, rules, or regulations relating to development within the City. Since the last update of the C mprehensive Plan in 1981, significant changes within the community have occurred. These changes include, but are not limited to the following: Only a small percentage, <59, of residentially zoned land in the City remains to be developed and cf this, no single site would exceed more than 10 lots. Increasing pressures are being felt for development of the commercial/industrial land in the City which as had little planning emphasis placed on it in the past. The nature of development along the main corrider through the City, T. H. 10, is being challenged for proposals for development/redevelopment contrary to zoning and/or land use designation. The current economy and development in the northern suburbs of Ramsey County have caused for developers to focus of Mounds View due to its general location. These development pressures have caused the City to question the viability of its current land use and development controls. The project would use the strategic planning process as a means to develop a "picture" of the type of community desired by its residents. The "picture" would then be used as the means for establishing land use and d velooment controls that would permit and encourage development consistent with this vision for the future. 4. Relationship of Proposed Project to Funding Criteria The proposed project directly relate to Funding Criteria Appendix G. in that the update of the City's �+ Comprehensive Plan will be the framework for the modification of the City's other land use or development control and any update will require it be consistent with the policies set forth in the Metropolitan Development Guide. Assistance is being requested of the Metropolitan Council due to the City's inability to finance this project on a short-term basis. 5. Work Program The Mounds View City Council and Planning Commission are currently in the process of working out the details of a work program with a qualified planning professional who has been selected to assist the City with this project. The basic framework, for the project is as follows: Establish Goals and Objectives Resident survey to determine the community's desires. . Update Comprehensive Plan Update Zoning Code and Subdivision Regulations The City has committed to funding this project in the amount of $20,000 spread out over a 4 year period �. commencing in 1986. Completion Date Due to the fact that a final work program has not been established, no completion date has been set, however, it is anticipated that the entire process would take no more than 18 months. 7. Other Financial Assistance The City has committed to funding this project at the level of $5,000 per year for 4 years. No other direct funding is available, however, significant committment of staff time and City equipment and facilities has also been made to ensure the successful completion of the projecc. Loan Requested S15,000 RESOLUTION NO. 2083 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF LAM^E: STATE. OF MINNESv,A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING SUBMISSION OF APPLICATION FOR METROPOLITAN COUNCIL LOCAL PLANNING ASSISTANCE LOAN WHEREAS, the Mounds View City Council and Planning Commission wish to undertake an update of the City's Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Code, Subdivision Regulations and other policies, rules, or regulations relating to development within the City; and WHEREAS, such a stt9y is estimated to cost $20,000; and HWEREAS, full funding of the project is impossible due to the significant demands placed on the City's limited financial resources; and WIlL•'REAS, the Metropolitan Council offers Local ; Planning Assitance Loans for such projects. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Clerk - Administrator is authorized to transmit an application to the Metropolitan Council for a $15,000 loan to finance the aforementioned project. Adopted this 15th day of September, 1986. ATTEST: (SEAL) III. WORK PROGRAM A. CONDUCT SERIES OF PLANNING SEMINARS OR MEETINGS At the outset of the planning program, it Is recommended that a series of three planning and development seminars be held with the Planning Commission, City Council and staff to discuss various issues related to planning and development In the city. The reason for these seminars, which would be held In the evenings, is to obtain a better understanding and, possibly, agreement of what the current problems area, and to determine future direction for the city. ileetJ,Dg__a: Discuss major development issues and opportun- Ities In the city and determine alternative future planning and development scenarios for city. rieeting_J2,t Discuss roles of City Council, Planning Commis- sion and staff in planning and development for the city. Mcexln9JI: Discuss major methods and approaches for imple- menting plane and programs Including zoning, subdivision regulations, economic development tools, environmental pro- tection approaches, etc. D. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN As was indicated previously, some of the background Informa- tion Is already available in various reports. Appendix A Indicates the general outline of a recommended Comprehensive Plan. The following are some major tasks required to update and revise the Comprehensive Plan. 1. Update, revise and consolidate background information Including maps. This Includes land use, population, housing, atc. 2. Analyze growth trends and projections for city. 3. Analyze major growth, development'and redevelopment issues facing city. 4. Analyze and revise goals and policies for the city in relation to future development and redevelopment. 5. Update and revise Comprehensive Plan a. Development Concept b. Land Use Plan C. Public Facilities Plan d. Dousing Plan e. Parks and Open .Space Plan J C. ZONING ORDINANCE AND SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS Both the zoning ordinance and subdivision regulations will be reorganized and rewritten to clarify provisions and stan- dards, as well as to incorporate additional standards and approaches for dealing with new development concepts. Ap- �. pend`z A includes a recommended outline. 1. a. Develop new provisions and standards. b. Reorganize and rewrite zoning ordinance. 2. Subdivision Rgculations a. Develop new provisions and standards. b. Reorganize and rewrite subdivision regulations. IV. PRODUCTS OF TUB PLANNING PROGRAM A. PLANNING REPORTS All members of the Planning Commission and staff will re- ceive a notebook for storing the 15-25 page planning reports which will be prepared for each major section of the pro- posed work program. B. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Upon completion of the outlined study program, the draft of a final plan, including summaries of all background documen- tation, planning alternatives and final policy decisions will be prepared. The consultant will provide the original and 20 copies of the Comprehensive Plan. C. UPDATED AND REVISED ZONING ORDINANCE AND SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS An updated and rewritter zoning ordinance and subdivision regulations will be prepared. The consultant will provide the original and 20 copies of these ordinances. D. REVISED ZONING MAP Jtv—r , d Z' APPLICATION FOR ADVISORY GROUPS Group Applied For: rat Imo! d(� O Cmlllsc"0 1 Seco— d ChoTEe (if n any): Cu 1 Name (print or type): Address: 8335 SP�I/i� 11iF ���� Years At This Address:I,, Years You Have Lived In Mounds View: Telephone: 11omet Work or Other: QUALIFICATIONS YOU WANT 'r0 HAVE THE COUNCIL CONSIDER Sk lls and interests: ✓(, OPS1G'� (CKCyRui^Ia �'� AF-QtITEcTR Employment, Occupat on or Other Experience: C)k^Ifirf- of 0A6fyFT Q6P Membe's r)s, Accompl shments Oc other pualiEi,ations: Please State Your Reasons For Wanting To Serve On This Committee: �TWF.q rj %e-,INtr lei, cvo1� Grt -Ts �kS PAP �i<1y�i�1c� �F_�ecr4khE: Your response to any oC tthe above may be continued on tho back materials which you want the Council and you may attach any other to consider. Signature (��_�ei>-- Date The City of Mounds View is committed to the policy that all persons shall have equal access to Its programs, facilities, and employment without regard to rare, creed, color, sex, age, national origin, or handicap. ry,SOLUTION No. 2124 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF iiAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA APPROVING JUST AND CORRECT CLAIMS AGAINST CITY FUNDS WIIEREAS, tha City Cfnmcii of Pounds View, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 412.241, Ims full authority over the financial affairs of the City and; WIDEREAS, The City Council has reviewed the claims numbers: 017792 through 017807 in the a.•nount of $. 62,204.78 i 017808 through 017Rtn in the amount of $ 403,98 020738 through 020814 in the amount of $ 57,328.07 through in the amunt of $ TOTAL AMOUNT OF CLAIMS PRESENTED $ 119 936 83 and has found said claims to be Just and correct; (list of any exception) flow THEREFCRE, be it resolved that the City Council of Mounds View hereby approved the attached lists of claims dated 11/12/86 by the vote ayes nayes ATTEST: (SEAL) Mayor Clerk-Adm n strator . .... it > n!11f< , �••. CHECK AMOUNT CLAINANT PURPOSE 017608 $ 43.98 Captain Video Pipeline 017809 330.00 U. S. Postmaster Postage 017810 30.00 N.S.C.B.O. Conferences $ 403.98 :,cllY.nF AOUNDSVIEW A C C 0 U N T S P A Y A 8 12186 PAGE 'I 6(CK K A M 0 U N I C L A I n A N I p U R P a S F 779 2 110000 F-L 9NUAK OTHER PROFESSIONAL SfRY 00 IVAN HUNYPOW OTHER.pROFESSICNAL _LRV —fir, 110. 0177:) A 110.00 R0869T PAULLIN OTHER PROFESSIONAL qV - - — ----------- ,I 01774i 814,00 BRIGHTON TRAVEL WC OTHER PROFESSIONAL SIRV 01T7v7387*07--!UPOSTMASTER . P-OSTAGE_ALL St ASON IS bVt)r--CCJ, SUPPLIfSp EQUIPMENT ti .01 - 7799 23s79 DEPT Of EMPLOYEE tEL. PENSIONS IP459,71 OEH, Of LPPLOW A W- o PENS IONS- 3ep951.95 FIRST STATE SANr- OF SALARIES# REGULAR APO UVOTIhEo REGULAR 794*07— PO EMPLY.0 RETPriNT. - IN 305o69 DEPT. OF REVEUE-SALES R E F U N 0 017604 0-5-0, K 5- NURSERY - -- - AND —AF —SU--- P PL IE---' S00-PERATI 146•0 MAUD MI N F, S OLTA. 01760ts 8t769.04 ichfica AUILDINGS 4 STRUCTURES 0-1780 . 7 --- 100.00 -- GO - V - I - TR , AINI . N - 6 SERVICE TRAINING all NECESSARY_ EXPENDITURES, SIHCE-1Ai-T—r-wtfC1L.-q ING__ W, elf, OF MOUNDSVIEW A c C 0 o N I S P A Y A 6 L f: 11/12/66 PAGE ',L"i!2 -CHECK 4 A M 0 U M T C t A I h A N T P U P P It S E .Is ATET COMMUNICATIONS COMMUNZCATIO 00739 1 9 ADVANCED PRINTING PRINTING APAD-1415C OFFICE SUPPLIES ANO-STATI OKEPY 020740 10400 AMERICAN LINEN SUPPLY CO CLEANING -TOWELS + FAGS' Ar 020741 60.24 AMERICAN. OFPICE PkOD, MISCWFICE SUPPLIES AND-SUPPLIEspoPERArING AN U + MOC� -CONTPoi. 12i.3q EAPI. F E, $UPRLI� PhENT NS SUPPLIES, FOUI OZ074B 166,00 AFACK MUSE BEtri - 0207 BaGh--R-satl-CAJWFLL INC SUP'rLIFSp Foolp"?"T 4 17 020745. — id?o 296.00 bRIWON VftERIMARY HOSP OTHER PROFESSIONAL 0 1 2OT47 65 - BAP_ AR. A - RA COLLINS SUPPLIES, TRAFFIC CCN'TPGL 020748 24.13 COMM OF LR N5lJRjATjU!i 0749 216,c0 COPY SALE S S COPY SUPPLIES 020750 2BG.0G CORPORATE R15K MA NAGERS INSURANCE + BONDS 020751 45-35 -c-L.TlEys- 1_+t- -EV.UJf MfXT g, 020753 C,'LQ754 020155 .w� 0 5 020757 t ANO-SUPPLIES, EQUIPMENT AUTO Syolk($ wC LIE-5.t--yEH-I(L5- 248.qO EL MARKETING SUPPLrESPOPERATING 51-Ri 1.42. ijc FIDELITY t GUAPANTY LIFE GROUP INSURANCE' 35.00 F110 by FOUR FkPAtASY EOUIPMElff Al 141 0207" 56 1 1, N, 7 10000 INTEPNATIONAL ASSOC PLi3G MEMBERSHIPS oivft-o 15196eo UO L,fl.C.I.T. INSUPANCE + BOW"s i0o. F-I-R.S T 64!!.X ST--P.4UL -PAYPLG- ME -S-T- PLEF 197.16 W W GRAINGER INC SUPPLIES, VEHICLE AND-SUPP.LIESP- EPuRWIT - AND -SUPPLIES, 5LDGS+GRlWS eig(C.ITY OF MOUNDSVIEW A C C 0 0 N T 5 P A Y A 3 L 'i 11/12166 PACE ::I CHECKY AMOUNT C L A I.. M A ti T PUR POSE 020761 20 937600 14AGUIRE AGENCY INC. INSURANCE + BONDS _U676 00_. MANACCOE-NI AOVISVt5,__ 020763 5,75 P,.ETFG AREA MGMT ASSOC CONFERENCES _2O 6 14+612..0 LEGAL S_ERVIC M RICAARDEYERS GENERAL SEROCE AND -PROSECUTING ATTY 020769 d7 64CS T ASPi7.LT CORP S 020766 72 AIJJL-HCjjyF IijoVs __5vjPP 6907b7 78.00 MINN FIRE INC SUPPLItSlpPERATING 65406 Np P A t',Er.aE R SH I P S met CLEF I p66'/ 7 0 48,75 240 LEXINGTON LANDSCAPING SUPOLVESP STREETS i T, 25400 NCRTHSfAk CHAPTER/ICfiQ MEMBERSHIPS 62077; TA 190746 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO ELECTRICITY # -a 6-7 7 4 -------52.d8 PANNO REPROGRAPHICS SUPPLIES* STREETS Lk ICANIS 176 lingood PIERSON-WILCOX ELECTRIC SUPPLIES] EQUIPMENT PP.OfX PHOTO PYSTrm SUPPLIFSpOPERATING :-'1 ..020777 6.96 � 2 SUPPL _I�ESI—E.QUIP.HENT—� -------- I 207 7 6 AND-SUPPLIESi VEHICLE AAq 7 7 9_ 7b.B., 49 .... ... RAESEY-SOU-M-TY IRFASUREA OTHER-P-POFES SIONAL. S �l V_ Al AND -PRINTING 0207ito I LE A.QL 35509 SMITH LUMBER CO EQUIPMENT 020762 50.b3 ShYDEFS DRUG STORES SUPPLIESPOPERATINC 1.10NERY SUPPLIES POPENAT Its.0 7,65 q763 'T PAUL.8QUKt$TA i I 020761, 52.15 JlSTATETREASORER SUPPLIESPOPEPATII('., 3�.ci TA�k:CT toisc OFFICE Suppi fi:5 0 0 0 :ICJTY OF MOUNDSVIEW A C C 0 U N T S P A Y A 8 L E 11/12/86 PAGE CHECK k 4 n 0 U N T C L A I M A N T P U TEIGAS INVENTORY AND-SUPPLIESY VEHICL'1 '1 020737 11.98 TOLL COMPANY SLIPPLIFSYOPERATI,:r 02076o 1p77b.00 TRACY U I t.-C_Q -114 . ...... INNF14TOPY 026789 17.Z5 UNIFORPS UfiLIMIlF0 14C SUPPLIESoOPERATIN." 7., ";4 020770 UNIiO4 P[,,!Tt-Ll SY'IT.'.!4 UNIFUYi + CL07p1:,:, L020791 15.29 VIKING C.LlEV L ur LPPL 20,23 VIKING ELECTRIC $UPPLIESP UTILITIES,-.,.4 020793 120,60 VIKING$ APPROVED SAFETY SUPPLI[SsOPERATING ---- — -- ----- - -0 0794 66,52 WARNEF TRUE VALIJE 4.09P SUPPLIES# gLbGS+GP!4 y, 020795 5 Q.. 9�fl KOF.T -ENT- AJE�1$- Ml� SUPP'LIESI-EQUIPM ------- - 020796 122.40 INGMAN LABORATORIES/ INC OTHER PROFESSIONAL SFAV �-010797 20.00 H1tNESOTA al:LETO InT SUPPLIESi STREET! -2 01 r4 6 6p206.115— -HOUMES &--GRAVE.'ADMIN. CHtFrES PAYAPLrz-_--. AND-DEPOSITS-DrEV FSC^rV. 020799 E38,42 CORRT;A _tt.f j�ECjFj.C_CO. REPAIR$# ECUIPMENT ....... •'froboo 25*50 PAYPICIA EDGERS R. E F U N 0 020eo1 10.50 CAP -A -VAN VEHICLES 020602 10.00 TRIER# ASS}f 020803 96.27 PlApy IN HAN SON PR'GRAtl !NSTRQCTORS 0206u4 141.80 HORSE & PIDCP VESTERN Wh CONTINGENCY i0100 JOHN C, PEPPOIN PEFUNDS ; 0?0806 40o00 MARK SWANSON REFUNDS U20607 74*66 si-. Ailf4oNY PAINTS SUPPLIIESt STPFETS ALESr INC...-StJFP.LIESp 675,0r. LIES014 TRuCK S a ;020609 40,00 TWIN TIRES OTHER PROFESSIONAL CIE P. V -p- 020610 15.98 VONDER mco 5 LIP P L I E 0 PE F A T 1-1, .. 0 =s: ,1 CITY O F MOUNCSVIEM ACC 0 u H T S P 4 Y A B l E 11/12/86 ;PACECE CHECK AMOUNTCLAIMAN I PURPOSE 0,20811 1w 00 LIURA ROSENBERGER F E F U N �2.4.812 .- d1,Q0— JEA1Lf13%SIAtZ___ S E F U `4 0 020e13 14o.00 NAT.50C.OF PROF, ENG. MEM8ERSHIPS i �' 020AI4 16.40 GCGD TIME ATTRACTIONSI I SALARIESPTEMP+PART TIME p 77 57PHZB.01_ ._--- TIME y 4�ey TOTAL OF 92 CHECKS TOTAL 119P M065 J fh{�tr� i h aQQl���.'N< RESOLUTION NO. 2121 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION OF COMMENDATION AND APPRECIATION TO HATT ROWLEY WHEREAS, on the morning of July 8, 1986 the City of Mounds View experienced a catastrophe caused by the rupture of an 8 inch hazardous liquid pipelin3 running through the City and subsequent explosion and fires resulting in the deaths of two Mounds View residents and severe injuries to a third; and WHEREAS, in response to this incident various individuals, organizations, and communities have come to the support and encouragement of the City of Mounds View and the Spano and Balk families; and WHEREAS, Matt Rowley offered his time to expeditious- ly and efficiently deliver to the homes in the affected area the City's Neighborhood Update; and WHEREAS, such a generous gesture deserves public recognition and acknowledgement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mounds View on behalf of the residents of the City commends Matt Rowley for his outstanding community service and offers our heartfelt appreciati-n for his unselfish gene-osity. Adopted this 10th day of November, 1986. ATTEST: Mayor (SEAL) Clerk -Administrator RESOLUTION NO. 2123 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION OF COMMENDATION AND APPRECIATION TO GREG ROWLEY WHEREAS, on the morning of July 8, 1986 the City of Mounds View experienced a catastrophe caused by the rupture of an 8 inch hazardous liquid pipeline running through the City and subsequent explosion and fires resulting in the deaths of two Mounds View residents and severe injuries to a third; and tAHEREAS, in response to this incident various individuals, organizations, and communities have come to the support and encouragement of the City of Mounds View and the Spano and Balk families; and WHEREAS, Greg Rowley offered his time to expeditious- ly and efficiently deliver to the homes in the affected area the City's Neighborhood Update; and WHEREAS, such a generous gesture deserves public recognition and acknowledgemec::. I NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mounds View on behalf of the residents of the City commends Greg Rowley for his outstanding community service and offers our heartfelt appreciation for his unselfish generosity. Adopted this loth day of November, 1986. ATTEST: Mayor (SEAL) Clerk -Administrator ORDINANCE NO. 415 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA 1 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF MOUNDS VIEW BY AMENDING CHAPTER 40 ENTITLED, "ZONING" The Council of the City of Mounds View does hereby ordain: SECTION I. Chapter 40.14, Subd. C, is amended by deleting the following: (1) All permitted accessory uses in an R-4 District. SECTION II. Chapter 40.14, Subd. C, is amended by adding the following: (1) Permitted accessory uses for mobile home and manufactured home parks are limited to: a. Entryway airlock up to 50 square feet. Entryway airlock exceeding 25 square feet must be engineered to be compatible with existing structure. b. Detached accessory building (216 square foot maximum) c. Deck d. Patio e. Room addition up to 200 square feet provided that the addition is engineered to be compatible `- with existing structure. (2) Permitted accessory uses for R-5 District uses other than mobile home and manufactured home parks: a. All permitted accessory uses in an R-4 Ditrict. SECTION III. This ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after the date of its publication. Read by the Council of the City of Mounds View on this 3rd day of November, 1986. Read and passed by the City Council of the City of Mounds View this _ _ day of , 1986. ATTEST: Mayor (SEAL) Clerk -Administrator APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney ORDINANCE NO. 414 H. 4: CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE 1986 LONG-TERM FINANCIAL PLAN The Council of the City of Mounds View does hereby ordain: SECTION I. The 1986 Long -Term Financial Plan as presented on October 13, 1986 and on file in the Clerk -Administrator's Office for public review is hereby adopted. SECTION II. This ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days from and after the date of its publication. Read by the City Council of the City of Mounds View this 27th day of October, 1986. Read and passed by the City Council of the City of Mounds View this day of , 1986. ATTEST: (SEAL) APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney Mayor Clerk -Administrator MEMO TO: Clerk -Administrator and City Council FROM: Director of Public Works/Community Development DATE: November 6, 1986 SUBJECT: SUPER AMERICA. PLANNING CASE NO. 172-85 Attached please find the following: (1) Resolution regarding Mounds View Planning Case No. 172-85. (2) Staff report dated November 5, 1986. The Mounds View Planning Commission did not meet on November 5, 1986, because their was not a quorum. Therefore, the Planning Commission has not made a recommendation on this development. SWT/bac RESOLUTION No. 2125 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION REGARDING MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING CASE NO. 172-85, SUPER AMERICA WHEREAS, Super America has requested City approval to construct a Super America gas station/convenience store in the City of Mounds View; and WHEREAS, construction of this building, as requested, requires approval of the development and conditional use permit; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on this development on August 26, 1985; and WHEREAS, Super America has changed the site plan since August 26, 1985; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on this development, including the changes, on November 10, 1986; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the staff report and reviewed information submitted by the applicant which includes the following: (1) Development Plan (2) Site Survey (3) Evidence of Site Control; and WHEREAS, the City Council has also reviewed this proposal and it is in conformance with all chapters of the Municipal Code, specifically Chapters 40, 42, 49, and 49A and State Statutes; and WHEREAS, this development does not need to be reviewed by the Rice Creek Watershed District; and WHEREAS, the Storm Water Control has been approved by the City Engineer; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View City Council approves the development per the request by Super America. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a development agreement be entered into between the City and the Developer which includes the following: RESOLUTION NO. 2125 PAGE TWO OF THREE (1) Exhibits: (a) Site, Grading, Lighting, Landscaping and Utility Plan (b) Development Plan (c) Site Survey (d) Legal Description (e) Ordinance No. 49A 7-Year Ferformance Bond of $1,000 (f) Building Plans and Specifications (2) Security for the development in the amount of $20,000. (3) Exhibit 2A to require the following: (a) Paved parking area to use B618 curbing. (b) Applicant must satisfy the requirements of City Code Chapter 40.07, Subd. K. (c) Approval from Ramsey County for curb cut. (d) Payment of all City expenses above and beyond amounts previously submitted. (e) F. and I. pedestrian curb ramps for sidewalk at curb cuts. (f) Super America shall provide a ten foot wide easement on the north side of the site for a right turn lane for the intersection of Highway 10 and County Road I• (g) The west access to the site from County Road I shall meet the approval of the City Engineer. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mounds View City Council approves a conditional use permit to include the following: (1) The hours of operation shall be 24 hours. After one year of operation, the City shall hold a public hearing to solicit input on the hours of operation. If there are many negative comments, the hours of operation may be reduced. (2) Outside loud speakers shall be utilized only for clearing pumps. (3) Outside r�erchdndising shall be confined to the concrete entrance slab. Outside merchandise stacking shall not exceed 4 feet in height. (4) The single pedestal sign shall be located as shown on the drawings. �. RESOLUTION NO. 2125 PAGE THREE OF THREE ATTEST: (SEAL) (5) If the business closes and is not reopened within one year, the conditional use permit is null and void and the underground tanks shall be removed. Adopted this 10th day of November, 1986. ---------------- mayor Clerk -Administrator �ify o� �aunds�e�d PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW DATE: November 5, 1986 (Regular Mtg.) AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: S H CASE NUMBER: 172-85 V / APPLICANT: Super America (Kraus -Anderson) WFROPOSEU REQUEST: Applicant -requests development review and conditional use permit approval to construct a 5,600 square foot gas station/convenience store (900 square (((,,,jjj]]] feet larger than their request in 1985). = J LOCATION OF REQUEST: Southwest corner of Highway 10 W and County Road I SITE SIZE: 71,688 square feet - 1.65 acres LOT DEPTH AND WIDTH: 235 feet by 250 feet EXISTING ZONING: B-3, Highway Business District CONTIGUOUS LAND USE: B-2 and B-3 Yid CONFORMANCE TO COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN: The Comp- P.U.D. The (� rehensive Land Use Plan states mixed use with the Comprehensive proposed development conforms Land Use Plan. ZONING CONFORMANCE TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Zoning was in 1985. There were no contin- changed from B-2 to B-3 gencies placed on the rezoning. The zoning conforms this with the Comp Plan. The existing zoning permits �. use with a conditional use permit. bid Z STAFF REPORT PAGE TWO OF THREE CASE NO. 172-05 �I SETBACKS Proposed structures, paving and curbing all meet minimum setback requirements. ACCESS Applicant proposes three access points (two access points from County Road I and one access from Hounds View Drive). One access on County Road I must be a joint access and City Code Chapter 40.07, Subd. K, must be satisfied. DRAINAGE The site does not need to be reviewed by Rice Creek Watershed District due to its small size (less than 2.5 acres). The applicant satisfies City Ordinance No. 49 requirements for drainage on the site. PARKING City Code requires 50 spaces. Applicant proposes 55 spaces ii,cluding 18 spaces at the pumps and one handicapped space. The total spaces are adequate for the proposed use. Note: B618 curbing will be required for the paved portion of the ry access parking. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUIREMENTS City Code requires the City Council to conduct a public hearing. Conditional Use Permit Section 40.18, Subd. DM requirements for motor fuel station: ' 1. All requirements of this section are complied with except for the following: (a) Paragraph (b) - Is the proposed building and site so dissimilar to the existing buildings or area as to cause impairment in property valves or blight? (b) Paragraph (g) - Will lighting meet the requirements of this paragraph and Section 40.04, Subd. 11, Subd. I, and Subd. J. (c) Paragraph Are the accetaleto thePlanningCommission? (d) Paragraph (o) - Where will garbage be stored and is it 0in compliance with Section 40.18, Subd. D(4)? (e) Paragraph (p) - Is any outside sale or service in compliance with Section 40.18, Subd. D(5)7 ~ STAFF REPORT PAGE THREE OF THREE CASE NO. 172-85 LIGHTING (City code 40.07, Subd. D, Paragraph (8)L). 1. Is lighting reflected away from adjoining property, abutting residential uses and public right-of-way? THE PLANNING COMHISSION SHALL CONSIDER CITY CODE SECTION 40.25, Are them conditions satisfied? LOADING BERTH The loading berth at the back of the building does not require a conditioal use de ection proposednloading pberth meets othe S� requirementsofucity©Code The Section 40.08. FIRE SPRINKLE/R� SYSTEM 9 �f re�}rcd,fa sprinkler system shall be installed. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT REQUIREMENTS 1. Exhibits: (a) Plans and specifications for buiding (L) Site plan 2. Exhibit 2A conditions: (a) Paved parking area to use B618 curbing (b) Secure approval from Ramsey County for street curb cuts (c) F. and I. sidewalk pedestrian curb ramps at street cuts TRAFFIC STUDY Attached a1ffrom nd Study daed 2, 1983, and letterdated July8, 1985 BUFFERING SITE FROM RESIDENTIAL The loading berth was facing County Road I in the 1985 plan. Is addits berthlisacloseretonrequired you because theresidentia1 property? the truck loading ITEM 13 MEMO TO: Clerk -Administrator and City Council FROM: Director of Public Works/Community Development DATE: November 6, 1986 SUDJECT: JLN DEVELOPMENT Attached please find the following: (1) Draft resolution regarding scope of Environmental Impact Statement for JLN Development. (2) Letters the City has received regarding the Environmental Assessment Worksheet. A final resolution is being prepared and will be placed in your box as soon as it is completed. The draft resolution presents the major issues that shall be discusssed and studied in the Environmental Impact Statement. The final resolution will include more references to State Statutes and regulations. SWT/bac DRAFT RESOLUTION NO. 2126 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF ;MINNESOTA RESOLUTION REGARDING SCOPE OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR JLN DEVELOPMENT WHEREAS, an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is required by Minnesota Environmental Quality Board (EQB), Rule 6MCAR 3 for this development; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) scoping document on October 27, 1986; and WHEREAS, the scoping period ended November 6, 1986; and WHEREAS, per EQB Rule 6MCAR 3.030 C.l.c., the City of Mounds View shall make a final scoping decision by November 26, 1986; and WHEREAS, the City has received letters on the EAW from the following: (1) Department of. Army dated October 3, 1986 (2) ;Metro Waste Control Commission dated October 16, 1986 (3) Minnesota Pollution Control Agency dated October 20, 1986 (4) Metropolitan Council dated October 24, 1986 (5) Minnesota Historical Society dated October 24, 1986 (6) Rice Creek Watershed District dated October 28, 1986 (7) Minnesota Department of Transportation dated November 3, 1986 (8) Walfr.id A. Johnson dated November 3, 1986 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View City Council shall require that the EIS address the following issues: (1) Item Nos. 12, 21, 22, 23 and 28 of the EAW (2) All issues presented in MnDOT's letter dated November 3, 1986 (3) Study existing noise along Quincy Street and County Road II-2, and compare existing noise with projected noise (4) Study the after construction levels of air pollution, dust, noise and odors on the residential area immediately to the north of the development (5) Consistency of the proposed project with the local adopted Comprehensive Land Use Plan RESOLUTION NO. 2126 PAGE TWO OF TWO 1 (6) Study the environmental impacts of the development with no access to County Road 11-2 (7) (ynben,teLed (8) Study the environmental impacts of the development as proposed in the Concept Plan dated October 13, 1986, but excluding access to County Road H-2 at Quincy Street Adopted this 10th day of November, 1986. ATTEST: >;'I (SEAL) Mayor. Clerk -Administrator II I INM P 114 i11d9 October 24, 1906 MINNESOTA HIS1;O,RICAL„SOCIETY Mr. Philip Carlson D1111yren Shardlow and Uban .100 First Avenue North - Suite 210 Hinneapolis, Minnesota 55401 Dear Mr. Carlson: Re: JLN Development, Inc./Hounds View SR 1/4, Sec. 0, 1,30N. R2311; Ramsey County NITS Referral File Number: CC-473 Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on the above project. State HistoricePreservationen reviewed pOfficer by theursuant to pNationaltHistoricies n the Preservation Act of 1966 and the Procedures of the National Advisory Council of Historic Preservation (36CFR000). This review reveals the location of no known sites of historic, architectural, cultirai, archaeological, or engineering significance within the area of the proposed project. There are no sites in the project area which are on the National Register or ble for thereforeinclusion , none whichmay LIP affected obylRegister, your proposal. Again, thank you for your participation in this important effort to preserve Minnesota's heritage. uineogely, Russell W. Fridley State Historic Preservation Officer RNF:dmb DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY ST. PAUL OnTRmT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS U61 o luub 1135 U.S.PG81 OFFICEA CUSTOM HOUSE St. PAUI. wiNNtSINNESOfA 63101.1471 QenorS e.a 3, 199G Een, ro ,•'1'S rII'('��'o� � Construction-Operations "3 i`f)1`1986 Reg•!?!tory Functions • �.! 1 nt��jv�'4 `. MTz.V�lll� CAr2LS01J S�nrour��sS�;«� ��r bAk1J0E1J1 SkNRDIoW P (�bAA11 uC• \SFr._. _ ..,(�\` a00 In AVE N M"t1t:nr,o4is1 PAkJ 55101 Re: J•LN DErveiapmcnlT!Trac. S'F11-�1i sec! 6J.zom.3 e. gzvi.T 2ANSCy CCU- 1TEa 1 I VA V We have reviewed the information provided us concerning the referenced project. The work you propose at the location stated is not within the jurisdiction of the Corps of Engineers. A D�pa,tment of the Army permit is not required to do this work. The reason for this determination is given at the bottom of this letter. This letter is valid only for the project referenced above. If any change in design, location, or purpose is contemplated, contact this office at (612) '.-"-7558 to avoid doing work that may be in violation of Federal law. l� PLEASE NOTF. THAT THIS CONFIRMATION LETTER DOES NOT ELIMINATE THE NEED FOR STATE, LOCAL, OR OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS, SUCH AS THOSE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES OR COUNTY. If you have any questions, please call MAQy MArzx Sincerely, �/y��f� Char Ilg Chief., Regulatory Functions Branch Construction -operations Division Reason for determination: -rki:, 54, Was 1nspedted 6y a Corps fcO �Lt•,151, JGP-rzj SFIITM . -L-1 wasdeiErmlked -1kA4 -the to L0 o.rEA iti yke photo O"d on-IkQ_rmp did uni eonsi•iiuA au Lt_tiiar of -Ihe i.11 S. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency )J IB�7.►I �G October 20, 1986 Mr.. Steven Thatcher planning Department City of Mounds View 2401 Highway 10 Mounds View, Minnesota 55112 Uear Mr. 'thatcher.: Enclosed please find a copy of the General Permit Rule, Minn. Rules Parts 7001.0010 to 7001.0210, the Indirect Source Permit (ISp) pale, Minn. Rules Parts 7001.1250 to 70U 350, the Air qualTry—P&rmtt Fees Rule, Minn. Rules Parts 7002.00101 the Control of Fugitive Matter Rule, Minn. Rule Part 7005.0550, and the Minnnesota Noise Standards, Minn. Rules Parts 7010.0010. The General Permit Rule covers requirements for applications for all �.. permits issued by the Minnesota pollution Control Agency, Including the ISP. The ISP Rule contains additional application requirements for projects such as the one proposed adjacent to Trunk Highway 10. The Permit Fees Rule requires a$50 and a $900 application fee to he paid at the time of application, processing fee. The permittee will he billed the $900 if the permit is issued. The Fugitive Matter (Dust) standard and the Noise standards must he met before an ISp will be issued. I have checked, andwehave received a copy of the so therEnvironmene is no tal Assessment Lrkshee`* for the above prof ect,to se.Jd a second copy. As we discussed on October 17, additional air quality and/or noise work may be needed for the ISP. if it is, the additional requirements will at a minimum be discussed in the comments made by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency's (MPCA's) Office of planning and Review in its review letter. You and Life developer/consultants for the project should feel free to discuss any comments relating to additional air or noise work needed, if any, with the contact person named in the letter, or with me. The responsibilities of the City of Mounds View under the o ISP are of a two fold nature. As we discussed, commencement constryctlr�n is forbidden by the ISP Rule until such time as a 1935 West County Rond B2, Rosev !e, Minnesota 55113.2785 Rptilonal Offices • oi,IrlhtBfn1nerd/Dalrolt LakeslMarshalURochester rrpM Oppdhmily 6aployar Mr. Steven Thatcher October 20, 1986 page Two final trip is issued. Commencement of construction is defined as anything which results in a continuous program of construction. It includes, but I'; not limited to, installation of utilities, site clearance, grading, and building. Since the Rule also forbids "allowing construction to occur", the City of Mounds View has an affirmative responsibility to retrain from insuing any typntil the permit andefromgensuringrthatlding permit constrructionudoes not commences inissued, rading the absence of a permit. In addition, the City ofasohave severalwill othermost citieslikely ineISPnamed fbra projects In on the a;pe of the projects in their respective jurisdictions. Thepurpose ISp is to ensure that traffic flow from the project does not lead to a violation of air quality standards. The City of MoundsView has the jurisdictioq to regulate the .traffic in acco�ance with Lhe.requirements of -the ISP_so•that _a violation will be prevented. If necessary, a third copermittee, such `as the Minnesota Department of Transportation, will be added. under Permission to included necessary copermittees is given authority of Minn. Stat. section 116.07 subd. 4a (1984). Should you have any questions, please call me at 296-7723. If you need a formal written response, please write to me at our new address, 0tanyRoad, concerns youlorMthe esota developersmight illbeglad toaddress have. Sincerely, Susanne M. Pelly, AICP Senior Transportation Planner Division of Air Quality cc: J. David Thornton John S. Seitz ME-TRUOLITAn WAITE TMn! Anl. fi.t, I October 16, 1986 Ms. Martha A. Allen Assistant Referral. Coordinator Metropolitan Council 300 Metro Square Building St. Paul, MN 55101 RE: Metropolitan Council Referral Pile Number 13955-1 i r Dear Ms. Allen: The Metropolitan Waste Control Commission has reviewed the Scoping Environmental Assessment Worksheet for JLN Development, Inc. Commercial/Industrial Project; the proposed project is to be located in the City of Mounds View. Because there is adequate capacity within the Metropolitan Disposal System, the Commission has no object.inn to this project provided is is consistent with the City's full Comprehensive Plan. Very truly yours, ! ., R. A. Odde Municipal Services Manager RAO:EJB:jlw cc: Audrey Dougherty, Metropolitan Council W. R. Johnson, MWCC 350 Mel* Square Building, Sainl Paul, Mlnnesola 55101 612-222-8d23 lO v Q�nj jj Molror)olltan Council C(��w'OIII/ - 0 Metro Square Building Seventh and Robert Streets 0 St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 Telephone 1612) 291-6359 .� Oc ober 211, 1986 •:j11'• /t:n Donald Pauley, Administrator City of Moundo View Ry" i�tU -' 2401 Highway 10 Cfi7 OF Mounds View, MN 55112 RE: Seeping Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAN) JLN Development, Inc. Metropolitan Council Referral File No. 13955-1 Dear Mr. Pauley: At its meeting on October 23, 1986, the Metropolitan Council considered the Seeping EAN for JLN Development, Inc. This consideration was based on the following statement from the Consent List which was approved by the Council. 'Die proposed JLN Development is a mixed use planned unit development which will include commercial (office/service/showroom), light industrial and restaurant uses on a 62-aore site at the intersection of Hwy. 10 and .I-35W in Mounds View. Development of the project is expected to occur in four stages over four years. The project is consistent with the city's comprehensive plan, the Metropolitan Development and Investment Framework, and the transportation, airports, parks and sewer, system plans contained in the Metropolitan Development Guide. It is also consistent with the other chapters of the Development Guide. The Scraping EAN is complete and adequate. The Council approved the above statement as its comments on the EAN. Attached is a letter from the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission. Sincerely, Sandra S. Gardebring Chair SSG: II cc: Greg Downing, Environmental Review Coordinator, Environ. Rev. Sao., EQB Steve Thatcher, Community Development Director, City of Mounds View Philip Carlson, JLN Development, Dahlgren, Shardlow, 6 Urban, Ina. R.A. Odde, Metropolitan Waste Control Commission Lucy Thompson, Metropolitan Council Staff An rel'iol 011P000114 rmnl.ryor R. •� to �� Rice Creek watershed district b October 28, 1986 35aSLEXINGTONAVENUE NORTH' SUITE/177 .11. r+r r5 §'i AROEN HILLS. MINNESOTA SSN2 r :I TELEPHONE (617)483-0634 r5 I � Mr. John Rutford, Referral Coordinator 1 Metropolitan Council ,` { P F7 `"L`'T Board of Managers 300 Metro Square Cs�sr' �; ?ndRegend Meetin41hWgl: ednesdays Seventh and Robert Streets J W a[AandaesCityHall St, Paul, Minnesota 5510I el Arden Hills City Hall BONITA TORPE, Admin. Ass'L Re: Metropolitan Council Review Notice for JLN Development, Inc. Ltcotion: SW quadrant of the intersection of County Rd. H-2 and I-3514, Moundsview. Purpose: Review and comment on a proposed cormercfal/industrial development for JLN Development, Inc. to be built on a 62+ acre site. Dear Mr. Rutford: Receipt is acknowledged of the following exhibits: 1. A letter from John Rutford, Referral Coordinator, Metropolitan Council dated October 9, 1986. 2. Letter from Philip Carlson - Dahlgren, Shardlow and Uban to John Rutford, Referral Coordinator, Metropolitan Council dated September 29, 1986. 3, Letter from Philip Carlson - Dahlgren, Shardlmv and Uban to Greg Downing, �l Environmental Division, State Planning Agency dated September 29, 1986. 4. Scoping Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) for JLN Development, Inc, dated September 29, 1986. Based on our review of these exhibits, it appears that the concerns of the Rice Creek Watershed District have been adequately addressed at this time for the above mentioned project. Please be advised that no construction activity is authorized without permit approval from the District. Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this project. If you have any questions, please contact us at 473-4224. Very truly yours, ELGENE A. HICKOK AND ASSOCIATES Engineers for the District "A', (z.Pafubdir. John C. Panuska, Civil Engineer cc: Board F. Murray District Office BOARD OF MANAGERS City of Mounds View A.J.CAnDINAL,Sn. GA. SANDE C.T. KING L.H. SCOTT. Sri. E.A. PETRANGELO'p r AIA1pA OMPHY MMSFYCOIINIY WMIINMI011 Co AAMSEY COUNTY Aw"COuNfY F A IOCYM A ASWIAIFR Cv*" Em @'. 413 Ail• rn"K J UUMAY Allwwy 2725540 tpNNESoT4 n� �F Minnesota Department of Transportation Transportation Building, St. Paul, MN 55155 �j.OF TRN�y Ina� Novembar 3, 1966 t t 4\ , Steve Thatcher, Comm. Dev. Dir. City of Moundeview 2dol Highway ION Moundeview, Mn. 55112 Re: JLN Development, Tnc./Moundeview Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) District 9 (Moundsview, Ramsey Co.) Dear Mr. Thatchers Phone 296-1652 The Minnesota Department �f Transportation (Mn/DOT) has completed the review of the above -referenced RAW, and offers the following comments for your consideration in preparation of the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) on the proposed project. 1. It is Mn/DOT's understanding after discussion with the consultant for the project that the SIS for JLN Development, Inc. will address land uses to the south of the development in order to determine what additional traffic will be generated by the proposed development from the south side. The EIS will also include Information about transportation impacts that will result from additional traffic at the proposed full development intersection on Trunk Highway 10 between County Roads H and II-2. 2. The EIS should also contain, as part of its traffic analysis, the existing and projected Average Daily Traffic (ADT) at the proposed intersection between County Roads H and 11-2 on TH 10. 3. Mn/DOT has noted that figure 9, in the SAW should have indicated existing ADT, projected ADT without the development, and projected ADT with the development. The SAW only indicated projected ADT with the development, which does not take into consideration growth that will occur, despite the development. This additional information should be presented in the EIS. An F.gual Oppnnunlq• 67npin er Steve Thatcher Page 2 November 3, 1906 9. Mn/DOT believes that traffic congestion problems will worsen at County Roads 11 and 11-2 because of the development. Moreover, the proposed intersection between 11 and 11-2 will be well over capacity, even without considering additional trips generated from the south, as requested in comment number one. There will be several years of congestion on TH 10 until new TH 10 is completed, sometime after 1995. if you require additional information from Mn/DOT, please contact Jerry Skelton, project manager, at our District Office in Oakdale, telephone number 779-1210. sincerely, '/ Cheryl Heide _ Environmental Coordinator Environmental Services section November 3,1986 WalfrldAshlle Johnson representing N 6,&b93b W 1M_ jb e0 Mrs. WaffrKA. Johnson y 2287 County ROM H-2 Mounds View, MN 55112 p'i110"G �•��` :llris) Hr. Ste veThatcher J Community Development Director City of Mounds View - 2101 Hfahwoy 10 North HoundsYiew,MN 55112 SUDJECT: Comments regarding Seeping EAW (a AN Development in Mounds View Dear Mr. Thatcher: The AN Development as propsed In the scopina EAW unnecessarily Introduces adverse environmental Impacts (olr pollution, dust, noise and odars) Into the existing residentlal area to the Immediate North of thedoveinpmenl This Is primarily 8 result of the proposed development being Inconsistent with the City of Mounds Vlew's Comprehensive Plan. The proposod developmA Is Inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan In these Important respects: I ) The Comprehensive Plan speciffcaliy recommends that a ring road be eslabllshed In the area proposed for development (rel: pages 71 & 72, page 96 & map page 97, & Pv 101). s) No clop road Is provided In the proposed development. Instead the development proposes four (4) separate access points to County Road H-2 for circulation. 2) Under the Comprehensive Plan's industrial Nis and Policies, Goal 2: Policy f, It specifically states that "Industrial uses shall be located within easy access of major sweats or arlerlals in order that Industrial- oriented traffic penetrate local streets r little as possible". Furthermore, on page 72 or tho Comprehensive plan, It pecifleally stales "axess to Industrial uses shell not penetrate the residential area", and on page 92, It stales that an accessive number of access points to abutting land shall be avoided. a) The proposed development penetrates the local residential street County Road H-2 at four (4) different points contrary to the Comprehensive Plan. b) Furthermore, one of the above access points for the major North -South street through the development lies directly Into Oulncy Street, In effect making Ouincy Street the North -South collector street for lho development. a) Pooe I of the Devoloper's Traffic Study stales that "Two,y{dllinnal across points to Individual buildings from County Road 11-2 are proposed west of iulnry Sveet."; In other words, two of the access points from County Rand H-2 are for specific Individual Induslrlal but Idings contrary to the Intent Of the Comprehensive P Ion. 3) The Comprehensive Plan (ref. pone 92) notes: "Local or residential streets shall be dosigned so or to prevent penetration by through traffic." a) The JLN Development proposes that 25% of the lelal prej0m. traffic volume to and from lho development site be along labl residenllai slrcels County Rost H-2 and Ouincy Wee' Page 2 b) The Developer's Traffic, Study'-idicales (hat 72 dolly Ilght and medium truck trips and G daily combInotIon or semi- ire ller !ruck. trips would use County Road 11-2. Along OulncyStreet, the Traffic Study Indicates 50dolly light end medium trips and 6dallycombination orseml-(raliertruck trips. Currently, neither of these streets are expnsed to either light/medium truck trips or combination/ semi -trailer truck trips and the adverse environmental Impacts of such truck traffic. 4) The Comprehenslye Plan (ref: page 92) notes: "Ex Isling residential streets $hatI be protected from r cc less If Ica[ Ion to more Intense use." a) The Developer proposes (a change the classification of OuIncyStreet from residential to collector status. b)Al a City Council meetingon Or ebnr 20,1906. it vies established In discussion with residents who live along Oulncy Street that this street Is already carrying lcxi much vehicular traffic for safety, considering the Plne+vood Elementary School Is located on the Southeast corner of the Inlerseclimn of 0ulney Street and County Road I, and the number of school children either crossing or walking along this street la get to and from school. 5) Under Commercial Opals andPollcles (Goal 2: policies dh e) and Industrial Goals and Policies (Goal 2: poilcv b) and elsewhere, the Comprehensive Plan calls for adequate screeningand buffering of adjacent residential areas from the adverse environmental effects of commercial and Industrial uses. a) The proposed development Is only providing the minimum setback from the residential area to the Worth (County Road 11-2) as required by the zoning ordinance. b) The developer Is providing some landscaping and bermino up to 60" high, which Is more for the benefit of the project than any adequate screening and buffer Ing for the residential neighborhood..' c) An effective screen and buffer could be a landscaped earthen berm of a minimum height of 10'0" up to 20'0" averaging 10'0" In height along County Road H-2. 6) Finally, the Comprehensive Plan suggests "Industrial uses In this area should be limited to a less Intense nature to Insure compatibility with surrounding commercial and residential uses. a) Tha proposed area of development could easily lake a different, less Intense form of development thrin proposed by this developer. b) The specific development under conslderallon could be scaled down to a less Intense form for better compatibility to the commercial and residential areas adjacent to the development. We ask, that the EIS for this development specifically address the question "is the proposed protect Inconsistent with the local adopted comprehensive land use plan or any other adopted plans?" Clearly, as shown above, the proposed project Is Inconsistent with Mounds view's Comprehensive Plan. This quesllon should beanswer9d In the final EIS for the project. Further, we speclflcally request that the EIS Investigate the following alternative proposals to millo3te the adverse environmental effects Introduced to the adjacent residential area to the Ilor lh of the development. A) Study and compare the environmental Impacts of a development proposal that Is conslstrnt with Mounds view's Comprehensive Plan; e.g. Ho access points nllmvalloCnnnlyRaMH-7.nndminlm.im 10'0"high lnndsrapedhormsprovided along the South shin of County Road 11-2 to ad quately screen and buffer the r^.sidontlal area to the north. Pegs 3 D) As a compromise proposal, study and compare the environmental Impacts of a development proposal that allows access to the site from County Road H-2 at the for East end via the extension of Program Avenue to County Road H-2, and at the for west end at Jackson Street via a direct access from County Road H-2 to the development site, with the County Road H-2 and Jackson Street Intersection distinctly separated from the direct access to development site from County Road H-2, and with residential area screened and buffered from development site by m inlmum I OT high landscaped berms. i Sincerely, _ WalfrldAshileJohnson Mrs. WelfridA. Johnsen y �ei,+1-rv(il cc: Stale of Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Division of Air Ouailly 520 Lafayette Road Saint Paul,11N 55155 Attention: Ms. Susanne Pelly hlinnes4ln Department of Transportation District 09 3485 HadieyAyeue North, Box 9050 North Saint Paul, MN 55109 Attention: Ms. Sue Itodapp Metropolitan Council 300 Metro Square Building Seim Pa1li, MN 55101 Attention: I9s. Lucy Thompson PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL• CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA Regular Meeting October 27, 1986 '- Mounds view City Ilall 2401 Hwy. 10yMounds View, MN 55112 ----------------------------------------------------------------- The Mounds View City Council was called to order 1. Call to by Mayor Linke at 7:03 PM on Monday, October order 27, 1986. The Pledge of Allegiance was said. 2. Pledge of Allegiance MEMBERS PRESENT: Councilmembers Blanchard, Quick, 3. Roll Call Ilankner, Naake and Mayor Links. ALSO PRESENT: City Attorney Meyers, Clerk/Admini- strator Pauley and Public Works/Community Development Director Thatcher. MoLi.on/Second: Haake/nlanchard to approve the 9. Approval of , October 13, 1986 minutes as corrected. Minutes: October 13 and 5 ayes 0 nays October 20, 1986 Motion Carried to Motion/Second: Quick/Ilankner to approve the October 20, 1986 minutes as presented. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carrie Mayor Linke closed the regular meeting and opened 5A. Public Nearir. the first public hearing at 7:05 PM. JLN Deyeloppme 5copng c,_�mE. Phil Carlson, representing JLN Development, stated SA _ they have assisted Staff in preparing the SAW scoping document, and he reviewed what the SAW is, and the necessity for it, and the procedure that was followed. lie stated it is addressing four major issues, storm water run-off, erosion, air and noise pollution, and traffic. Mounds View City Council IteguLar Meeting ------------------------------------------------- Director Thatcher stated the scoping period ends on November. 6, for any written documentation to be sub- mitted to the Cite, and the -ity will need to make n final decision by November _1. lie added the Minnesota Ilistorinl Society is in the procear of doing a search of the area also, and they will have their findings to the City by November 6. wally Johnson, representing his mother .rho lives at 2287 County Road 112, stated he would like a survey made of the existing noise levels at County Road 112 and Quincy, to compere to the anticipated noise levels with increased traffic. Mr. Carlson replied such an analysis is a routine part of the EAW and will be included in it. Mr. Johnson stated that in comparing the EAW and Comp plan, lie feels this development would be introducing adverse problems to the area to the north, and he feels they could all be resolved to the residents satisfaction if. the Comp plan was followed. Ile stated he takes exception with Ouest•ion 1112, and asked that the study specifically address th-i development on the basis of the Comp Plan. Councilmember Ilaake stated she endorses Mr. Johnson's comments. Mayor. Linke closed the public hearing and reopened the regular meeting at 7:19 PM. Mayor Linke closed the regular meeting and opened the next public hearing at 7:19 PM. Mayor i,inke reviewed the purpose of the 1907 long term financial plan and the process that was followed. Ile stated a copy is available at City (tall during normal working tours, for the public to review. Mnyor Linke closed the public hearing and reopened the regular meeting at 7:21 PM. Mayor Linke closed the regular meeting and opened Lhe next public hearing at 7!21 PM. Director. 'I'haLcher introduced Chuck Cook, of Continental pevelopment, tile developer who is pro- posi.ng to develop tl:e site into 16 single family lots. tor. Cook stated they had held an informational mooLi.ng some time ago, and he has just now finished the plat. lie allowed n diagram of the area, showing how the 16 single family lots would be situated and October 27, 1986 Page Two ---------------- 5B. 1986 Long Term Financial. Plan 5C. Red Oak . Schoc Site Major Subdivision City of Mounds View PROCLAIMING THE MONTH OF NOVEMBER TO BE EPILEPSY MONTH IN THE CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW WHEREAS, there are more than 100,000 Minnesotans with some form of epilepsy; and WHEREAS, Epilepsy is the second most common neurologi- cal disfunction or physical impairment, not a disease but a disorder of the nervous system; and WHEREAS, sixty percent of those persons who have epilepsy,are elementary school children or younger children which is approximately one child in every second classroom; and WHEREAS, early diagnosis and attention to the social and neurological aspects of epilepsy will afford people better control; and WHEREAS, there continues to be a need for improved education and more information regarding public attitudes toward understanding and accepting those persons with epilepsy. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that I, Jerry Links, Mayor of the City of Mounds View do hereby proclaim the month of November as EPILEPSY MONTH IN THE CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW, MINNESOTA and encourage the residents of our City to increase their awareness of the needs of those who have epilepsy. Jerry Links, Mayor r CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW CITY COUNCIL AGENDA SESSION !f \ NOVEMBER 17, 1986 7:00 P.M. 1. Consideration of Staff Report Regarding JLN Tax Increment Proposal for 4807 Mustang Circle (Information to be provided Monday night.) 2. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding Staff Training 3. Consideration of Resolution No. 2127 A Resolution of Commendation and Appreciation to Investigator Jack Chambers ding 4, Consideration ConditionsfoftPoliceaff mInvestigatororandum rTimothyp Employ— ment Smith 5. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding General Fund Budget Transfers PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW s �� 1 RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA Special 0c 091 Ifeefing i November 5, 1986 Mounds View City Hall 2401 Highway 10, Mounds View, MN---55112 ---------...--------------------- Acting Mayor Blanchard called the meeting to order at 5:03 p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT: Acting Mayor Blanchard, Councilmembers HHankner and Quick. ALSO PRESENT: Clerk -Administrator Pauley, Finance Director Brager and Public Works/ Community Development Director Thatrher, Motion Second: Hankner/Quick adoption. of Resolution No. 2122 and waived the reading. 4 ayes 0 nays Acting Mayor Blanchard adjourned the meeting at 5:07 p.m. 1. Call to order 2. Roll Call 3. Adoption of Resolution No. 2122 Motion Carried Respectfully submitted, Donald F. Pauley Clerk -Administrator VLU- ai E, PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL /` 147) CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA'� Regular Meeting November 10, 1986 Mounds View City Hall 2401 Hwy_10, Mounds View_ - 1. Call to MN55112 --------------------------- ------------ The.Mounds View City Council was called to order by Order Mayor Linke at 7c00 PM, on Monday, November 10, 1986. 2. Pledge of The Pledge of Allegiance was said. Allegiance MEMBERS d andMayor COuncilmembers Hankner, 3, Roll Call Hake ALSO PRESENT: City Attorney Meyers, Clerk/Admini- strator Pau ley and Public Works/Community Development Director Thatcher. 9. Approval of Motio_ n/Second: Hankner/Blanchard to approve the Minutes: October 27, 1986 minutes as presented. October 27, 198 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried 5. Residents There were no residents requests or comments from Requests and the floor. _,mments from the Floor 6. Approval of Mayor Linke asked that Item E be removed for Consent Agenda discussion, at the request of the Clerk/Administrator. Motion/second:_ Haake/Hankner to approve the consent agenda, minus Item E, and waive the reading. Motion Carried" 5 ayes 0 nays Clerk/Administrator Pauley explained that on appointed E, Staff would request that Mr. Saunders be a two year term on the Planning Commission, to commence immediately and run until December 31, 1988. kner to ric P. d— er— s to the Plannin'gnCommissionnfortaEtwo year Saur term, commencing immediately. Motion Carried 5 ayes 0 nays Mounds View City Council November 10, 1986 Regular Meeting �( fepage Two -------------------------- ---y' - . ------------------- Clerk/Administrator Pauley read Resolution -No. 2121, 7. Approval of commending Matt Rowley for his assistance to the City, Resolutions. and Resolution No. 2123, commending Greg Rowley for No. 2121 his assistance to the City. Motion/Second: Haake/Quick to approve Resolution No. 2121, a resolution of appreciation and commendation to Matt Rowley. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried`, Motion/Second: Blanchard/liankner to approve Resolution 8. Approval of No. 2123, a resolution of appreciation and commenda- Resolution No. tion to Greg Rowley. 2123 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Mayor Linke closed the regular meeting and opened the 9. Public Hearing:. public hearing at 7:08 PM. Super America Steve Johnson, representing Super America, explained they are asking for a conditional use permit, which was approved by the Council last year, but the year has expired, so they are asking for either a continu- ance or reissuance of the conditional use permit. Roman Mueller, of Super America, made a presentation of the site plan, grading plan, planned vegetation, floor plan of the by Uding, and the building elevations, and he compared them to how they had been presented last year, showing what changes had been made. Councilmember Haake stated she frequently turns left from Highway 10, west onto County Road I, and she can forsee problems with cars turning right into Burger King, and left into Super America, and the traffic stacking up that is turning from Highway 10. She stated she is concerned and feels there is a potential for accidents. Director Thatcher explained Super America is dedicating an easement to the County, so the County could widen the road in the future. The Department of Transportation will not approve a turn lane from County Road I to go south on Highway 10, however. Councilmember Blanchard asked if the location of the loading dock has been changed. Mounds View City Council November 10, 1986 Regular Meeting Page Three ' �-1-j---------------------- ---- Mr. Mueller showed the location of the loading docks, and he explained the berming is 4-5' between the two locations, with vegetation on top of the berming. Director Thatcher reviewed the plan that had been approved a year ago. He stated they have increased the proposed building size about 900 sf. lie added the Planning Commission has not reviewed this, as they did not have a quorum for their November meeting, but they do plan to meet November 12, and will discuss it then. Councilmember 11aake reminded the Council the residents who had attended the hearing last year had many concerns about the proposed development, including having headlights shine in their windows at night. Councilmember Blanchard asked when the delivery trucks will be arriving, as the residents had expressed concern with that issue. A representative from Super America explained the Super America delivery truck would come in the evening, once a week, and the gas truck would come more frequently, as the need was determined. He explained the majority of deliveries from the various vendors would be during the day, and they could request the Super America truck come on Friday evenings, around 5:30 PM, as they have a run in that area at that time. Councilmember Quick stated he was concerned with the planned berming and topography of the property, and whether it would be adequate. Mr. Mueller showed what they have planned, and explained what the various plantings would be. Councilmember Quick stated he would like to see sight lines from the new drawings, to have a better idea of what will be visable to the residents in the area. Mr. Mueller explained he did not have that drawing available, but tie pointed out how much more vegetation was planned now. Councilmember 13aake stated she would like to see the berming remain as it was originally approved. She added that she has no problem with the increase in building size. Mary Larson, 2568 Mounds View Drive, asked if the traffic from Super America would be using Mounds view Drive. Mayor Linke replied that a good portion of the traffic could use Mounds View Drive, and he explained that Mounds View Drive was planned as a service road, and it's purpose is to serve the commercial areas that will be T � Mounds View City Councilbf � November 10, 1986 Regular Meeting nL G Page Four ___________________' I ________ l developed fronting along Highway 10, but will not have access onto Highway 10, r Mrs. Larson stated they often have a mess with garbage from Burger King, and they are concerned with problems from Super America. She added she knew it was commercial property that was going to be developed when she purchased her townhouse, but she does not want to see large trucks using Mounds View Drive. Councilmembe Haake stated they cannot determine which way the trucks will go, and she also pointed out that Mounds View Drive was designed as a service road for the commercial property. Mayor Linke closed the public heating and reopened the regular meeting at 7:37 PM. Director Thatcher reviewed proposed Ordinance No. 415, 10. First Reading and the necessity for it. of Ordinance No. 415 Motion/Second: Haake/Quick to approve the first reading of Ordinance No. 415, amending the Municipal Code of Mounds View by amending Chapter 40 entitled "Zoning", and waive the reading. 5 ayes 0 nays Y-tion Cared Councilmember Hankner asked if this would conflict with any of the State statutes. Director Thatcher replied Staff had checked with the Fire Department, and they said it was not a problem. Attorney Meyers explained the City has the right to regulate development of the parks, but they cannot license them, as that is a State requirement. Motion/Second: Quick./Blanchard to have the second 11. Second Reading reading and adoption of Ordinance No. 414, adopting and Adoption the 1986 long-term financial plan, and waive the of Ordinance reading. No. 414 Councilmember Quick - aye Councilmember Hankner - aye Councilmember Haake - aye Councilmember Blanchard - aye Mayor Linke - aye Motion Carried Mounds View City Council r,r<,,4 November 10, 1986 Regular Meeting! Page Five ----------------- ------------------------------------14------------------- Motion/Second: Quick/Haake to table this item to the 12. Consideration Planning Commission and have them determine their of Resolution feelings on the changes received, and forward back No. 2125 to the Council. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Councilmember Hankner stated she was concerned about whether the Planning Commission would have a quorum, since they had not had one for so long. Clerk/Administrator Pauley replied they will not be taking any official action, so they can still discuss it and forward their findings to the Council. Mayor Linke asked Director Thatcher to talk to Super America and have them work with Kraus/Anderson on grading and berming, and so forth, and a shared access with the property next to them. Councilmember Blanchard stated the Council has the authority to readdress the hours of operation in one year to see whether they are working, and asked if the Council could make changes to the berming then, if they felt it was necessary. Clerk/Administrator Pauley stated they could rewrite the development agreement now, to include that. Mayor Linke pointed out that once the other sites are developed, there will not be eny other land available for Super America to use for berming, so they should address the issue now. Director Thatcher reviewed proposed Resolution 13. Consideration No. 2126, relative to JLN Development. He stated of Resolution that per the Environmental Quality Board rules, No. 2126 the Council must make a fir�il decision on the development by November 26, 1986. Motion/Second: Quick/Hankner to approve Resolution No. 2126, regarding the scope of the environmental impact statement for JLN Development, and waive the reading. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Director Thatcher stated that once the resolution is signed, it will be sent to the Environmental Quality Board for publication. Director Thatcher had no report. 14. Report of Pub Works/Communi Development Director Mounds View City Council - November 10, 1986 Regular Meeting P..,� Page Six --------------------------------------------i. ---- --------------------- Attorney Meyers asked the Council to consider declaring the emergency of July 8, 1986 over, and repealing (^ emergency ordinances 1, 2 and 3. Motion/Second: Hankner/Blanchard to declare the emergency relative to the Williams Pipeline explosion over and repeal Emergency Ordinances 1, 2 and 3. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried_ Mayor Linke asked if repealing the ordinances would have any affect on whether gas will begin running through the pipelines again. Attorney Meyers replied that those issues are encompassed in the City's lawsuit, and will not be affected by the repeal of the ordinances. Attorney Meyers reported a hearing is scheduled for 9 AM on November 13 in Federal Court, to discuss the safety of the pipeline, and if the Court does allow operation of the line, it would be regulated to not exceed 900 lbs. of pressure. Attorney Meyers reviewed the City's position on the closure of the line and why it is asking for replacement rather than repair of the line. Attorney Meyers reported he has done a preliminary C review of the development agreement for JLN,,Develop- ment. Councilmember Quick welcomed Jerry Skelly and his 16. Reports of cable crew to Mounds View, with their first live Councilmembers: broadcast of the Mounds View City Council. Councilmember Quick Councilmember Hankner reported the Governor's Councilmember Pipeline Commission will be meeting next Thursday, Hankner November 20 to begin working on the legislative recommendations. She added that suggestions are still more than welcome. Councilmember Haake had no report. Councilmember Haake Councilmember Blanchard had no report. Councilmember Blanchard Mayor Linke read a proclamation, declaring the Mayor Linke month of November to be epilepsy month in the City of Mounds View. Mayor Linke reported he had spoken to the Ramsey County Library Trustees on November 6, regarding the proposal for a library within Ramsey County, Mounds View City Councils =� y,J November 1 , 1986 Regular Meeting ti a_ L Pa a Seven ------------------------ -ems '- _-------------9 --------- Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported the preliminary 17. Report of tax increment financing development agreement has been Clerk/ prepared by Holmes and Graven, for the JLN Development, Administrator and he will be meeting with Holmes and Graven and JLN Development on November 14, to go over the agreement. Mayor Linke adjourned the meeting at 8:05 PM. 18. Adjournment Respectfully submitted, Donald F. Pauley Clerk/Administrator c �i MEMO TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: CLERK -ADMINISTRATOR DATE: NOVEMBER 3, 1986 SUBJECT: STAFF TRAINING As you may recall, the Council authorized $2,500 for general staff training along with the individual departmental training requests which were included under my Adminis- tration budget. It is my desire that the training for 1987 which I intend to be more intensive and specific as to the needs of individual staff members or groups of staff members and start off with a program designed for all employees. During the last few years frequent situations have arisen where communica- tions between members of the City staff and members of the public have placed the City in unacceptable positions. It is my desire that the first training session for 1987 be a training session for all City employees dealing with this specific issue. Attached for your information is a copy of an outline for Kathryn Barrington's "Dealing with the Public" Workshop. This workshop which would be available during an eight hour session for all City employees would cost between $800 and $850 plus travel expenses. As Ms. Barrington is located in the Twin City Area said travel expenses should be minimal. Unless Council voices strenuous objections with respect to this intention it is my desire to schedule this training session to occur early in January of 1987. A portion of the cost for this session would be charged to the Police Department Budget which receives training monies from a special state fund. It is also my proposal, that except for the Police Department, the City offices be closed for the entire day In order that all staff members may attend this meeting and that box lunches be purchased for all employees attending the session in order that an ample amount of time may be made available during the day for this session. I have previously attended sessions conducted by Ms. Barrington and have found them to be extremely helpful, particularly in this area. As stated before, unless Council has any objections with respect to this proposal placed before you I will go forward with scheduling this session. DFP/mjs Attachment' TRAINING SERVICE October 29, 1986 Mr. Donald F. Pauley Clerk -Administrator City of Mounds View 2401 Highway No. 10 Mounds View, Minnesota 55112 Dear Don: I enjoyed our conversation yesterday. It seems like our senses of humor flow along the same lines! As promised, I am enclosing several additional pieces of information for your use a,; you present your training options to the City Council: 1) The outline for Kathryn Barrington's "Dealing with the Public" Workshop. As I mentioned, this is roughly 3-hour session and we could handle 40-50 people. 2) The actual agenda from Bloomington's first session. 3) Two marketing pieces which describe the goals/benefits to be derived from this type of training program. Give me a call if I can provide anything else at this point. Other- wise, I will await your call to determine our next steps. rn erely / /% % Carol M.' choeneck Administrative/Program Associate CS/at Suite 202, Minnesota Building • 46 East Fourth Street 9 St. Paul, Minnesota 55101.6121222.7409 Members: Association of Minnesota Counties, League of Minnesota Cities, Minnesota Association of Regional Commissions, Minnesota Associatio- of Townships, Minnesota Community Colleges, State of Minnesota and University of Minnesota DEALING WITH THE PUBLIC Instructor: Kathryn Barrington OBJECTIVES This one -day seminar is an opportunity for you to develop strategies and techniques to improve your ability to work efficiently and profitably with today's public. WHO SHOULD PARTICIPATE Anyone who deals with the public, particularly receptionists, field personnel in recreation, building inspection and public works, and public safety officers. TOPICS e Today's changing public - inability to wait - unwillingness to be uncomfortable a Self-concept and job title - how they affect the way the public sees and treats us - how to win s Listening effectively (the difference between hearing A listening) a Understanding language - common words - their effect a Guiding people to the point quickly a Giving accurate instructions o Non-verbal communication s Controlling emotion and being objective (skills to handle opinionated and angry people) a Conflict management s Handling new situations a 'Self-fulfilling prophecy (how it can help in being more effective with oths, s ) i Ways to promnfe a positive departmental image INSTRUCTOR: KATHRYN BARRINGTON conducts training programs for a variety of organizations covering a range of topics. She is particularly well-known for this seminar on 'Dealing With the Public.' ew N lightor LO e N r to In Q 0 W W Z i m 3 w Z L13 AGENDA TEN' BUILDING/GOAL SETTING Holiday Inn 1780 East County Road D Maplewood, MN 55110 770-2811 FRIDAY, MARCH 23 12:00 - 1:00 p.m. 1:00 - 3:00 p.m. 3:00 - 3:15 p.m. 3:15 - 5:30 p.m. 5:30 - 7:30 p.m. 7:30 - 9:00 p.m. 9:00 P.M. SATCRDAi, MARCH 24 8:00 - 8:30 a.m. 8:30 -10:00 a.m. 10:00 -10:15 a.m. 10:15 -12:00 Noon 12:00 •• 1:00 p.m. 1:00 - 3:00 p.m. 3:00 - 3:15 p.m. 3:15 - 5:00 p.m. 5:00 p.m. Lunch (Council and GTS) Team Building with Council Break Team Building with Staff and Council Dinner Issue Identification Hospitality Breakfast Prioritize Issues Identify Restraining Forces Break Problem Solving Lunch Establish Strategies for Resolving Issues Break Action Steps Developed to Follow Up Dinner GOVERNMENT THE NEED TRAINING SERVICE GOAL SETTING / TEAM BUILDING PROGRAM "Some people watch things happen Some people make things happen Some people wonder what happened." More and more local governments are realizing the need to become more PROACTIVE; to create a team of policymakers and staff who are all committed to the same goals for the organization. This does not easily happen with the constraints of day-to-day activities and deadlines. It requires frank discussion and a commitment to action. A "retreat" workshop can provide the opportunity to step back and gain a broader perspective for the future of the organization. With the guidance of a trained facilitator, council and/or staff have an opportunity to do the following: 1. To identify a clear set of goals for the city; 2. To prioritize the goals and establish direction for the city; 3. To develop support for these goals among staff and council; 4. To develop the communication and teamwork among staff and council required to achieve these goals. 1HE PROCESS Phase I Needs Assessment The first step of goal setting involves gathering information about the organization. Data that can be useful to the consultant is: 1. Background and historical information. 2. Current strengths and weaknesses of the organization. 3. Current opportunities and threats facing the organization. 4. Unaerstanding of team functioning. 5. Desired hopes of individuals for the organization. No matter what process is used to gather information, it remains anonymous to assure confidentiality with participants. Suite 202, Minnesota Building • 46 East Fourth Street • St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 9 6121222.7409 Phase II Goal Setting / Team Building The general results of the goal setting are anonymously shared to form a ^} common base of information and understanding. The specific agenda is I tailored to especially meet the identified needs and time frames specified, but the general framework follows this format: s Share and clarify data from interviews • Identify critical issues and concerns • List and clarify goals • Prioritize goals • Develop Action/Implementation Plan r Evaluation and Follow-up Strategies Phase III Follow-uo and Evaluation Following the workshop, the client writes a written report of the workshop. It is recommended to hold another session within 3-6 months of the event, where progress on the goals is recognized and a reassessment can be made. It is important to emphasize that planning is an on -going process. Although this program should result in significant progress, it is just the beginning of continuous planning process. TEAM BUILDING/GOAL SETTING Opportunity: Effective teams are more than a collection of individuals. To be a team requires commitment, the ability to resolve differences, clear communication, and an understanding of team functioning. As a result of the team building session, participants will be able to: • understand differences in individual style o Improve communication between staff and council o Build team spirit by acknowledging strengths and weaknesses of the team • Identify issues which block effective communication and team- work s Develop an action plan to increase effective teamwork I ,S2I1t,J GOVERNMENT TRAINING SE6VICE ounded In 1976 October 27, 1986 c Ln Mr. Donald P. Pauley Clerk -Administrator City of Mounds View 2401 Highway No. 10 Mounds View, Minnesota 55112 Dear Mr. Pauley: The Government Training Service is pleased to submit the fol- lowing proposal to the City of Mounds View to provide training for its employees. Goal Setting As discussed with Barbara Arney, this would involve members of the City Council and key staff. Personal interviews (1/2 hour in length conducted over the phone) would be conducted with each participant prior to the designing of the sessions. A 2- day presentation would then be made at a location of your choice. We would then recommend a 1/2 day follow-up session approximately 6 months later. Total cost to the City of Mounds View would be $2,500, $4/person for handout r,.terials and instructor travel expenses. Dealing with the Public Based upon the needs you expressed to Barbara, I believe two workshops might be approrpiate. Both utilize Kathryn Barrington as an instructor. Enclosed are outlines for both workshops. While I cannot cite exact cost figures until I negotiate with 2 Ms. Barrington, I would estimate the cost for either program to be $800-850 plus instructor travel expenses. 401V Once you have had an opportunity to review this proposal and enclosures, please give me a call and we can discuss our next/ steps. Suite 202, Minnesota Building • 46 East Fourth Street • St. Paul, Minnesota 55101.6121222.7409 Members: Assoclation of Minnesota Counlies, League of Minnesota GINA , Minnesota Association of Regional Commissions, Minnesota Assoriation of Townships, Minnesota Community Colleges, State ..I Minnesola and Univemily of Minnesnln Mr. Donald F. Pauley City of Mounds View October 27, 1986 Filially, Barbara informed me that you also had an interest in some general supervisory training for Mounds View staff. As I believe you know, GPS is presently offering a series of one -day open enrollment "Secrets of Successful Supervision" workshops. My understanding was that you might want to preview this type of training by sending someone to our next offering. Enclosed is a brochure for the November 21 session. While it is filling rapidly, we still have several openings. I look forward to the opportunity of working with you on this worthwhile training endeavor! Sinc re y', Carol M. Schoenec Administrative/Program Associate CS/at Encl. �1 DEALING EFFECTIVELY WITH THE HOSTILE PUBLIC CInstructor: Kathryn Barrington Objective: Information, theories, strategies and practise help public employees to develop a positive style when confronted with the hostile citizen. Topics: Understanding the difference between opinionated. argumentative, angry and hostile individuals Recognizing the non-verbal communication that affects reactions during conflict in a confrontational situation Learning the five step strategy Developing professionalism in working with citizens RecoUnderrstandingwhich what situations language phrases should be avoided in a confrontation Takingccarretof yourself, recognizing bug he three methods of dalinwith emotionalism rn-out Participants Will Learn: How to identify hostility What not to du when confronted What to do when you are dealing with one or more angry in How to 'turn sumeune around' to your point or accept the circumstances DEALING EFFECTIVELY WITH THE HOSTILE PUBLIC Instructor: Kathryn Barrington r Objective: Information, theories, strategies and practise help public employees to develop a positive style when confronted with the hostile citizen. Topics: Understanding the difference between opinionated, argumentative, angry and hostile individuals Recognizing the non-verbal communication that affects reactions during conflict Learning the five step strategy in a confrontational situation Developing professionalism in working with citizens Recognizing what situations require power Understanding which common language phrases should be avoided in a confrontation Practicing the three methods of dealing with emotionalism Taking care of yourself, recognizing burn -out Participants Will Learn: Hnw to identify hostility What not to do when confronted What to do when you are dealing with one or more angry individuals How to 'turn someone around' to your point or accept the circumstances RESOLUTION NO. 2127 r CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION OF COMMENDATION AND APPRECIATION TO JACK CHAMBERS WHEREAS, in the early morning hours of April 6, 1986, the Mounds View Police Department began investigating the homicide death of Tammi Jo Shappell; and WHEREAS, as Investigator Jack Chambers was assigned as the primary investigator to the Shappell homicides and WHEREAS, Investigator Jack Chambers professionally and conscientiously investigated the case -- compiling reports and evidence and submitting same to the Ramsey County Attorney; and WHEREAS, as a result of Investigator Chambers' investigation a suspect was apprehended and subsequently charged with 1st Degree Murder; and WHEREAS, on October 22, 1986 the suspect pled guilty to 1st Degree Flurder bringing about a successful prosecution to the case; and WHEREAS, Investigator Chambers spent many hours above and beyond the call of duty dealing with family members and other parties during emotional issues. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mounds View on behalf of the residents of the City commends Investigator Jack Chambers for his outstanding professionalism and dedication to duty and offers its heartfelt appreciation. Adopted this 24th day of November, 1986. ATTEST: Mayor Linke Councilmember Blanchard Councilmember Haake Councilmember Hankner Councilmember Quick Clerk -Administrator Pauley MEMO TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: FINANCE DIRECTOR - TREASURER BRAGER DATE: NOVEMBER 13, 1986 SUBJECT: GENERAL FUND BUDGET TRANSFERS Jt,J 5 The City recently received billings and paid $11,300.00 for worker's compensation audits to First Insurance Twin Cities. Payment of $1,766 was made for the period May 1, 1984 - April 30, 1985 and payment of $9,534 was made for the period May 1, 1985 - April 30, 1986, Corporate Risk Managers, Inc., our insurance consultants and I had disputed the 1984-e5 audit since August 1985 due to incorrect classi- fications of several employees. At that time the audit indicated an additional premium of $4,671 was due. The corrected audit billing was $1,766 and results in a savings of $2,995 to the City. The 1985-86 audit requested an additional premium of $ 9,534 due to underestimation by the agent of payrolls for police, parks, and recreation employees. These additional premiums are billed because of the manner in which worker's compensation premium payments are handled. At the beginning of the policy period a deposit premium is paid for that period based upon estimated payrolls. At the end of the policy period our payroll records are subject to audit by a representative of the insurance company and a premium is calculated that is based on actual payrolls. That premium is compared to the deposit premium and, in this instance, we are billed for additional premiums. The insurance account, 100-190-4480, will be approximately $500 over budget upon payment of the final installment of this year's premiums. Staff requests a budget transfer of $11,800.00 from contingency to the insurance account to cover these budget overages. Another problem area in the budget involves the purchase of a new Civil Defense Siren. The 1986 Budget anticipated purchase of a new siren at a cost of $35,000 to be financed by a loan from the Special Projects Fund. The loan was to be repaid over a five year period. The siren was purchased at a cost of $20,839. At the time the siren was ordered we learned that we would be receiving Revenue Sharing monies in 1986 which we had not budgeted for. Revenue Sharing was to be used for fire protection services and the amount saved by using Revenue Sharing rather than our own funds, $39,225, was transferred to contingency. Staff proposes to ammend *-he 1986 Budget to take into account these events which occurred subsequent to it's adoption. They are: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL NOVEMBER 13, 1986 PAGE TWO 1) Cancel the original appropriations for the siren and loan proceeds: 100-3692 Revenue, Loan Proceeds $35,000 100-230-4703 Equipment $35,000 2) Transfer the amounts budgeted for the first payment on the loan: 100-230-4801, Principal $5,966; 100-230-4802, Interest $2,800; to the account the siren purchase was charged to 100-230-4703 Equipment $8,766 3) Transfer $12,073 from contingency, the amount necessary to cover the balance of the siren purchase, to the account the siren was purchased from, 100-230-4703, Equipment. The 1986 Budget was prepared with 1985 salaries budgeted in the personnel services accounts because the impact of anti- cipated comparable worth adjustments was not known at the time the budget was prepared. Monies for salary adjust- ments were budgeted in accounts 100-120-4970, Salary Adjustments, Account 700-121-4910, Contingency and Account 730-121-4910, Contingency and with the understanding that when salary adjustments were made budget transfers would be made from that account to the various department's personnel services accounts. In February when it appeared that the Comparable Worth Study would be delayed an across-the-board salary adjustment was given to all employees and it was anticipated that the balance of the monies in the salary adjustments account would be used for Comparable Worth Adjustments later in 1986. At that time it was my intention to wait until Comparable Worth Adjustments were made and present one resolution authorizing budget transfers for both rather than presenting two. It now appears that Comparable Woth adjustments will not be made in 1986 due to delays in completion of the market study. Therefore, I am requesting authorization of a resolution which approves the budget transfers for the salary adjustments granted in February and which designates the balance of the 1986 salary adjustments account for future Comparable Worth adjustments. RECOMMENDATIONS: 1) Approve a resolution which authorizes budget transfers to cover the costs of worker's compensa- tion premiums and the Civil Defense Siren. A proposed resolution is attached for your considera- tion. L MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL NOVEMBER 13, 1986 PAGE THREE 2) Approve a resolution which authorizes transfers from the salary adjustments account to various departmental personnel services accounts and which designates the unused amounts of the General, Water, and Sewer Funds for future Comparable Worth salary adjustments. A proposed resolution is attached for your consideration. DB/mjs Attachment: Proposed Resolution C RESOLUTION NO. 2128 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING BUDGET TRANSFERS FOR 1986 SALARY ADJUSTMENTS AND DESIGNATING A PORTION OF THE FUND BALANCE OF THE GENERAL FUND AND THE RETAINED EARNINGS OF THE WATER AND SEWER FUNDS FOR FUTURE COMPARABLE WORTH SALARY ADJUSTMENTS WHEREAS, Resolution No. 1839 established 1986 salaries for non -union personnel; and WHEREAS, the 1986 General Fund budget provided for salary adijustments for non -union personnel; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mounds View that the following budget transfers for the 1986 General Fund, Water Fund and Sewer Fund budgets be hereby authorized: GENERAL FUND FROM 100-120-4910 Contingency $29,767.00 T 100-120-4010 Administration, Salaries $ 1,578.00 100-120-4030 Administration, Pensions 36.00 100-120-4050 Administration, worker's Comp 5.00 100-150-4010 Finance, Salaries 255.00 Y55 2,.00 2 100-150-4030 Finance, Pensions 7.00 100-150-4050 Finance, Worker's Comp 94 46 100-180-4010 Garage, Salaries .00 6 100-180-4011 Garage, Overtime 11.00 50.00 100-180-4030 Garage, Pensions 0 100-180-4050 Garage, Worker's Comp y�3805.0 100-200-4010 Police, Salaries 112.00 112.00 100-200-4011 Police, Overtime 472 100-200-4030 Police, Pensions 318.00 100-200-4050 Police, Worker's Comp 871.00 100-230-4010 Civil Defense, Salaries 99.00 100-230-4030 Civil Defense, Pensions 100-230-4050 100-260-4010 Civil Defense, Worker's Comp Pub. Works/Community Dev., Salaries .00 2,503.00 100-260-4030 Pub. works/Community Dev., Pensions 283.00 100-260-4050 Pub. Works/Comm, Dev., Worker's Comp 76.00 100-270-4010 Streets, Salaries 44.00 100-270-4011 Streets, Overtime 244 .00 74.00 100-270-4030 Streets, Pensions 100-270-4050 Streets, Worker's Comp RESOLUTION NO. 2128 PAGE TWO OF THREE 100-350-4010 Recreation, Salaries 3,636.00 100-350-4020 Recreation, Part-time 1,900.00 100-350-4030 Recreation, Pensions 898.00 100-350-4050 Recreation, Worker's Comp 397.00 100-360-4010 Parks, Salaries 1,872.00 100-360-4011 Parks, Overtime 33.00 100-360-4030 Parks, Pensions 21.3.00 100-360-4050 Parks, Worker's Comp 118.00 29,767.00 WATER FUND FROM 700-121-4910 Contingency $ 3,804.00 TO 700-120-4010 Administration, Salaries $ 1,138.00 700-120-4030 Administration, Pensions 412.00 700-120-4050 Administration, Worker's Comp 28.00 700-121-4010 Operations, Salaries 1,886.00 700-121-4011 Operations, Overtime 44.00 C 700-121-4030 Operations, Pensions .. 209.00 700-121-4050 Operations, Worker's Comp 87.00 S 3,804.00 SE47ER FUND FROM 730-121-4910 Contingency $ 3,767.00 TO 730-120-4010 Administration, Salaries $ 1,138.00 730-120-4030 Administration, Pensions 412.00 730-120-4050 Administration, Worker's Comp 28.00 730-121-4010 Operations, Salaries 1,895.00 730-121-4011 Operations, Overtime 44.00 730-121-4030 Operations, Pensions 93.00 730-121-4050 Operations, Worker's Comp 157.00 $ 3,767.00 L. GRAND TOTAL $37,338.00 RESOLUTION NO. 2128 PAGE THREE OF THREE BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Mounds View that $51,146 of the Fund Balance of the General Fund is hereby designated for future comparable worth salary adjustments; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Mounds View that $1,196 of the Retained Earnings of the Water Fund is hereby designated for future comparable worth salary adjustments; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Mounds View that $1,233 of the Retained Earnings of the Sewer Fund is hereby designated for future comparable worth adjustments; Adopted this 24th day of November 1986. ATTEST: Mayor (SEAL) Clerk -Administrator RESOLUTION NO. 2129 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA Q A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING VARIOUS BUDGET TRANSFERS WHEREAS, the 1 amounts for insurance Civil. Defense warning WHEREAS, addit tion insurance in the consequence of policy April 30, 1984, 1985; 986 General Fund Budget provided protection and the purchase of a new siren; and tonal premiums for worker's compensa- amount of $11,800 were charged as a audits for policy periods ending and WHEREAS, a new Civil Defense Siren was purchased at a cost of $20,839 and an interfund loan to finance it's purchase was not found to be necessary. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE City Council of the City of Mounds View that the following 1986 General Fund Budget adjustments and transfers be made: 1) The following budget appropriations are hereby cancelled. 100-3692 Loan Proceeds $35,000 100-230-4703 Civil Defense, Equipment $35,000 2) The following budget transfers are hereby authorized FROM 100-120-4910 Contingency $12,073 lOn-230-4801 Civil Defense, Loan Principal $ 5,966 100-230-4802 Civil Defense, Loan Interest $ 2,800 TOTAL $20,839 TO 100-230-4703 Civil Defense, Equipment $20,839 ATTEST: (SEAL) yor Clerk -Administrator TO: Mayor & Council ! FROM: Finance Director -Treasurer Brager 1 DATE: November 13, 1986 RE: STATUS OF 1986 CONTINGENCY ACCOUNT The following lists the status of the Contingency Account as of this date: Per Adopted 1986 Budget $52,439 Transfers per Resolution 2003, Budget Contingency Plan +65,383 Minutes February 24, Comprehensive Plan Update, R.L. Wuornos & Associates - 1,095 Minutes May 27, Phone system maintenance agreement, Executone, Inc. - 1,116 Minutes July 14, Gale -Yost walkway, Johnco, Inc. - 8,769 Minutes July 28, Playground Equipment, Greenfield Park Minnesota Toro-14,992 Minutes August 11, Office furniture, American Office Equipment, Inc. - 3,723 BALANCE NOVEMBER 13, 1986 88,127 The following transfers are anticipated per recent memorandums: Balance November 3, 1986 $88,127 Worker's Compensation Insurance-11,800 Civil Defense Siren-12,073 ANTICIPATED BALANCE $64,254 Should you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me. DB/ds PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCI G k : CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA Regular Meeting October 27, 1986 Mounds View City Hall 2401 Hwy. 10,Mounds View, MN 55112 ---------------------------------- The Mounds View City Council was called to order 1. Call to by Mayor Links at 7:03 PM on Monday, October Order 27, 1986. The Pledge of Allegiance was said. MEMBERS PRESENT_: Councilmembers Blanchard, Quick, Hankner, Haake and Mayor Linke. ALSO PRESENT: City Attorney Meyers, Clerk/Admini- strator Pauley and Public Works/Community Development Director Thatcher. Motion/Second: Haake/Blanchard to approve the October 13, 1986 minutes as corrected. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion/Second: Quick/Hankner to approve the October 20, 19db minutes as presented. 5 ayes 0 nays Mayor Linke closed the regular meeting and opened the first public hearing at 7:05 PM. Phil Carlson, representing JLN Development, stated they have assisted Staff in preparing the EAW scoping document, and he reviewed what the EAW is, and the necessity for it, and the procedure that was followed. He stated it is addressing four major issues, storm water run-off, erosion, air and noise pollution, and traffic. 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Roll Call 4. Approval of Minutes: October 13 and October 20, 1986 Motion Carried Motion Carried 5A. Public Hearin JLN Developme Scoping Dcmt. EAW Mounds View City Council October 27, •1986 Regular Meeting Page Two ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Director Thatcher stated the scoping period ends on November 6, for any written documentation to be sub- mitted to the City, and the City will need to make a ! final decision by November 10. lie added the Minnesota Historial Society is in the process of doing a search of the area also, and they will have their findings to the City by November 6. Wally Johnson, representing his mother who lives at 2287 County Road H2, stated he would like a survey made of the existing noise levels at County Road H2 and Quincy, to compare to the anticipated noise levels with increased traffic. Mr. Carlson replied such an analysis is a routine part of the EAW and will be included in it. Mr. Johnson stated that in comparing the EAW and Comp Plan, he feels this development would be introducing adverse problems to the area to the north, and he feels they could all be resolved to the residents satisfaction if the Comp Plan was followed. He stated he takes exception with Question V 2, and asked that the study specifically address the development on the basis of the Comp Plan. Councilmember Haake stated she endorses Mr. Johnson's comments. Mayor Linke closed the public hearing and reopened the regular meeting at 7:19 PM. Mayor Linke closed the regular meeting and opened the 5B. 1986 Long next public hearing at 7:19 PM. Term Financial Plan Mayor Linke reviewed the purpose of the 1987 long term financial plan and the process that was followed. He stated a copy is available at City Hall during normal working hours, for the public to review. Mayor Linke closed the public hearing and reopened the regular meeting at 7:21 PM. Mayor Linke closed the regular meeting and opened 5C. Red Oak School the next public hearing at 7:21 PM. Site Major Subdivision Director Thatcher. introduced Chuck Cook, of Continental Development, the developer who is pro- posing to develop the site into 16 single family lots. Mr. Cook stated they had held an informational meeting some time ago, and he has just now finished the plat. He showed a diagram of the area, showing how the 16 single family lots would be situated and N .; Mounds View City Council Regular Meeting -------------------------------------------- where the cul-de-sac would be located. fie explained very little grading would be required, as the land is so high already. Director Thatcher reviewed the plat map, showing the proposed layout of the lots and access. He stated the Planning Commission had reviewed the preliminary plat and they recommend approval. He added the site is not in the flood plain or wetland. Mayor Linke asked if the holding pond would hold water at times other than heavy rains. Director Thatcher replied that it would not, that the water would drain out rapidly, since this is high, dry ground. Mayor Linke expressed concern with the direction of the flow for some of the lots. Director Thatcher explained the grading plan is not being approved at this time, and it will be submitted at a later date. Councilmember Haake stated she was concerned about the existing homes with the long back yards. She added she understands tht- were all contacted, and she wants to make sure they understand they will be land -locked with this development. the added she feels R-1 is very desirable for this area, nd it will be a benefit to have the land back on the tax rolls. Duane McCarty asked if the fuel tanks had been removed from underground yet. Mr. Cook replied they had been removed. October 27, 1986 Page Three ----------------- Director Thatcher stated the developer would like to build on the lots fronting Red Oak and Sherwood as soon as possible, as all the services are in there and the lots are ready to go. He added the interior lots, on the cul-de-sac would be developed next spring. Arnold Knapp asked if Mr. Cook would be building on all the lots or selling them off. Mr. Cook replied he will be selling to other realtors, with plan approval. He added that the cost of the lots will dictate the types of homes that will be built. Dill Frits, 8072 Long Lake Road, asked what would happen to the fence that is still there from when the school was there. Mr. Cook replied he would like to see the fence remain, but it has .been his experience with other school Mounds View City Council Regular Meeting property he has developed, that the fence may encroach on some property lines. He added that if that is the case, it is certainly the property owner's perogative to remove that section of fence, if they like. Rick Voke, 8135 Red Oak Drive, stated that between his and his mother's lots, they would have enough property to subdivide, but they had never been approached by anyone, asking if they were interested. Director Thatcher replied he had personally gone door to door in the neighborhood to talk to the residents, and anyone that was not at home, he left his business card in their door, with a note to call him if they were interested. Mr. Cook pointed out that he and Director Thatcher had discussed Mr. Voke's lot, and that next to it, but did not pursue it any further as the two lots combined did not have enough frontage for three lots without a variance. October 27, 1986. Page Four Mr. Voke asked for a clarification of the proposed setbacks for Red Oak Drive. Director Thatcher explained the setbacks have been adjusted somewhat, and the houses t:. go in on Red Oak. Drive can meet the setback but cannot be any closer that what is there without a variance. He added that Lot 2 was given a 10' setback variance by the Planning Commission, to Allow for enough buildable square footage on that lot, and the one house on Red Oak could then meet up with the setback for Lot 2. Mayor Linke closed the public hearing and reopened the regular meeting at 7:37 PM. Harold Stassen, former Governor of Minnesota, gave 6. Residents copies of a recommendation he was forwarding to the Requests and Secretary of Transportation, regarding the pipeline Comments from running through Mounds View, and he reviewed it with the Floor the Council and also read his letter to Joseph Nall, Chairman of the NTSB panel. lie explained he has had a life long interest in the people of Minnesota and their safety. The Council thanked Mr. Stassen for his involvement in the issue. Dennis Richardson, 2320 Highway 10, asked the Council for a temporary occupancy permit for their car wash facility. Director Thatcher explained Staff does recommend a temporary occupancy permit for Suds and Shine, contingent upon approval from the Building Inspector. Mounds View City Council Regular Meeting October 27, 1986 Page Five ------------------------- Councilmember Hankner asked when the fence would be installed. 9 Mr. Richardson replied it is scheduled for Saturday, November 1. Motion/Second: Hankner/Quick to grant a temporary occupancy permit for Suds and Shine at 2320 Highway 10, contingent upon approval from the Building Inspector. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Councilmember Blanchard asked thht the payment to 7. Approval of Johnco of $8,949 be removed from Item I, as it is Consent Age; on the agenda for discussion and approval later in the meeting. Motion/Second: Hankner/Blanchard to approve the consent agenda, minus the payment to Johnco on Item I, e.hd waive the reading. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carr Motion/Second: Haake/Blanchard to approve Resolution 8. Consideratic A No. 2120, regarding Planning Case 184-86 for the Red of Resolution Oak School site, and waive the reading. No. 2120 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Motion/Second: Quick/Hankner to approve the first 9. 1st Reading o reading of Ordinance No. 414, adopting the 1986 long- Ordinance term financial plan, and waive the reading. No. 414 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carrie Director Thatcher reviewed the need for potassium 10. Consideration permanganate feed equipment for Well No. 3, at of Staff Memo Water Treatment Plant No. 1, and he reviewed the On City Projei two bids that had been received. 86-7 Motion/Second: Haake/Blanchard to award the project to R. L. Anderson-Beckstrom, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $14,947, with the money to come from 1986 project line 700-122-412;_ 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carrie( Mounds View City Council Regular Meeting October 27, 1986• Page Six Director Thatcher explained that pursuant to Council's 11. Consideration authorization of the project in July 1986, Staff would of Staff Mo-to now like a specific award made at this time, for a Regarding'•,_. specific dollar amount, and he reviewed the two bids Gale/Yost that were received. Addition Clerk/Administrator Pauley explained this was a formality only, as the work had already been approved by the Council. Motion/Second: Quick/Hankner to authorize award of the project for the bike path to Johnco, in an amount not to exceed $8,949.00, with the money coming from the contingency account. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried. Councilmember Blanchard stated she still felt the work could have waited, in view of the fact that the contingency fund is going down due to the pipeline situation. Mayor Linke explained the work had already been done, and this is merely a formality in approving the payment. Councilmember Haake stated she agreed with Council- member7Blanchard's comments, but ahe realizes the work has been done. Motion/Second: Blanchard/Hankner to approve the payment of $8,949.00 to Johnco, with the funds coming from the contingency account. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion carried . Motion/Second: Quick/Haake to approve Resolution 12. Consideration No. 2119, approving the appointment of Thomas of Resolution Kinney as a full-time City employee, and waive the No. 2119 reading. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Police Chief Ramacher updated the Council of activity 13. Department in the Police Department for the past quarter, and ' Head Quarterly he presented an overhead projection, showing how Reports Mounds View is rated in crime statistics when compared to surrounding communities. He reported the four reservists are attending school now and should be graduating in December. He also commended Jack Chambers for the excellent work he did on the Tammi Schapel murder case. Finance Director Brager presented the third quarter Mounds View City Council Regulat Meeting -------------------------------------- financial report to the Council, and he reviewed the �. activities of the Finance Department for the past quarter, and what they have scheduled for the next few months. u Councilmember Haake pointed out that Mounds View's mill rate has not gone up in the past three years, which is great, but she had hoped to see that on the front page of the New Brighton Bulletin, rather than in the middle of the paper. Mayor Linke stated he was also concerned with that issue, and would be addressing it in his report later in the meeting. Park Director Mary Saarion reviewed the activities of the Park, Recreation and Forestry Department for the past quarter. She reported a number of trees have been removed due to disease, but the percentage is down over 1985. She also reported the summer programs had gone over very well and had a very good participation level. Director Thatcher reviewed the activities of the Public Works/Community Development Department for the past quarter. He reported the majority of fire inspection duties have gone back to the Fire Department, and they have budgeted for someone for 1987, to work for 4 or 5 months, to do both apartment and fire inspections in the City. October 27, 1986 Page Seven Director Thatcher reported they have received verbal 14. approval of the loan for the study of the planning area of Districts 6 and 12, of the Comprehensive Land Use Plan, from the Met Council, and he asked authorization to retain the services of Gunnar Isberg, as had previously been discussed, in an amount not to exceed $14,825, contingent upon receiving written approval from the Met Council. Clerk/Administrator Pauley reviewed what would be done with the plan, and that it would be an 18 month process, involving more than Districts 6 and 12, and would be more than one document. He added he would like to move ahead at this time and not lose momentum. It was the concensus of the Council to wait for the written contract from the Met Council, approving the loan, before proceeding any further, as they did not feel the momentum would be lost. Director Thatcher asked for clarification from the Council of exactly where they would like the stop signs placed for County Road H2 and going north, in conjunction with the planned JLN Development. lie presented an overhead map of the area, indicating where he understood they wanted the signs. He added they would have the signs in place yet this fall. Report of Public Works! Community Development Director Mounds View City Council October 27, '1986- Regular Meeting Page Eight ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tt was the concensus of the Council to have the stop signs placed as was shown. Attorney Meyers reported the Ramsey County Court System has been unified, and all the judges are now district court judges, and it is working very well out of the New Brighton facility. Attorney Meyers reported he and Clerk/Administrator Pauley had attended the NTSB hearings, and reviewed what has happened to date with that. Councilmember Blanchard read a prepared statement, saving some City Staff had spoken behind her back to certain individuals, stating how she was going to vote and her standing on certain issues, and that she was extremely angry that this had been done, and the individuals involved knew who they were and she expected an apology and retraction. Councilmember Quick had no report. Councilmember Hankner reported she had attended the pipeline safety cimmission meeting. Councilmember Haake had no report. Mayor Linke reported he will be passing the report on courtroom consolidation on to the Council, once he receives it. Mayor Linke reported he had sent a letter to the New Brighton Bulletin, regarding the placement of articles on the City of Mounds View in that paper, stating he felt Mounds View was not being given it's share of front page space and coverage. tie also po=nted out that Mounds View is not listed cn their letterhead, as other City's are. He reported he had received a lengthy response back from Gene Skiba, the editor, and he would be making copies for the Council.. Clerk/Adninistrator Pauley asked the Council to set a meeting of the Canvasing Board for 5 PM on November 5, 1966. Motion/Second: Quick/Blanchard to set a meeting of the Canvasing Board for 5 PM on Wedne;.day, November 5, 1986. 5 ayes 0 nays () 15. Report of Attorney 16. Reports of Councilmembers_: Councilmember Blanchard Councilmember Quick L 17. Report of Clerk/Admini- strator Motion Carried Mounds View City Council Regular Meeting --------------------------------- ------ Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported the Ramsey County Board will be having a presentation made to them the morning of November 3 by Williams Pipeline Company, and he will provide further details to the Council as he receives them. Mayor Linke adjourned the October 27, 1986 Page Nine 18. Adjournment