Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packets - 1986/12/01CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW CITY COUNCIL AGENDA SESSION DECEMBER 1, 1986 7:00 P.M. 1. Consideration of Memorandum Regarding Leadership/Reorgani- zation of Parks, Recreation and Forestry Department 2. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding East Metro Economic Development Council 3. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding 1987 City Newsletter Bids 4. Consideration of Letter of Resignation of Parks and Recreation Commissioner Cindy Linnell 5. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding Repair of Judicial Ditch No. 1, Branch No. 5 6. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding Existing Driveway Reconstruction 7. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding Liability Insurance for Apartment Owners 8. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding Additional Premium for Worker's Compensation Insurance Policy 9. Consideration of Staff Memorandum and Petition for Street Light on the East Side of Groveland Road Between 8343 and 8335 Groveland Road PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA Regular Meeting November 24, 1986 mounds View ^ity Hall 2401 Hwy. 10, Mounds View, MN 55112 The Mounds View City Council was called to order. by Mayor Linke at 7:02 PM on Monday, November 24, 1986. The Pledge of Allegiance was said. MEMBERS PRESENT: Councilmembers Quick, Hankner, Haake, Blanchard and Mayor Linke. ALSO PRESENT: City Attorney Meyers, Clerk/Admini- strator Pauley and Public'Works/Community Development Director Thatcher. Motion/Second: Hankner/Haake to approve the November 5, 1986 minutes as presented. 4 ayes 0 nays 1 abstention Mayor Linke abstained from the vote as he had not been present at that meeting. Motion/Second: Hankner/Blanchard to approve the November 10, 1986 minutes as corrected. 5 ayes 0 nays Chuck Cook, of Continental Development, stated he is preparing the final plat for the Red Oak develop- ment, and he would like to get the Council's ' decision on whether he should plan a walkway for that area, as had been discussed previously. Mayor '_•inke asked that tl:e item be discussed under Director Thatcher's report.. Motion/Second: Hankner/Quick to approve the consent agenda, as presented, and waive the reading of the ' resolutions. 5 ayes 0 nays 1. Call to Order 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Roll Call 4. Approval of Minutes: 11/5/86 and 11/10/86 Motion Carried Motion Carried 5. Residents Requests and Comments from the Floor 6. Approval of Consent Agenda Motion Carried Mounds View City Counci a l ¢, November 24, 1986 Regular Meeting _ , L. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page Two Clerk/Administrator Pauley read proposed Resolution No. 7. Approval of 2127, commending Jack Chambers for the work he did in Rslt. No. the Shappel murder case. 2127 Motion/Second: Blanchard/Hankner to approve Resolution No. 2127, a resolution of commendation and appreciation to Jack Chambers. 0 Motion Carriee 5 ayes nays Mayor Links presented the resolution to Mr. Chambers, with the Council's thanks. Director Thatcher reported the Planning Commission 8. Consideration has recommended approval cf the revised plan from of Rslt. No. Super America. 2125, Super America Roman Mueller, representing Super America, presented the revised site plan, noting they had made the changes requested by the Council and Planning Commission. He showed the site lines and stated there would be no view of the store from the residen- tial area. He also showed the planned signage, which has not been changed over the original plan, and he reported the berming has been changed back to the original plan. He also indicated that with the change in location of the loading dock, they do not anticipate any problems at all with truck traffic or headlights shining out onto Mounds View Drive. Motion/Second: Quick/Blanchard to approve Resolution No. 2125, regarding the Super America Gas Station, and waive the reading. Motion Carried) 5 ayes 0 nays Motion/Second: Hankner/Haake to approve the hiring 9. Consideration. of three cable tv production employees, per Staff's of Staff Memo' memo dated November 20, 1986. Regarding Hiring of 5 ayes 0 nays Cable TV >mployees Motion Carriec Director Thatcher reported the City's loan applica- 10. 1.jport of tion has been approved by the Met Council, and he Public Works/ asked the Council to retain Gunner Isberg's services Community per his proposal of September 22, 1986, to assist Development the City in updating the plans. Director Mounds View City Council November 24, 1986Page Three Regular Meeting ; ------ °---------------------- Motion/Second: Blanchard/Haake to approve the contract with Gunner Isberg, per his proposal dated September 22, 1986, at a cost not to exceed $14,825. 5 ayes 0 nays Mr. Cook explained the proposed walkway for the Red Oak subdivision would provide an outlet to the adjacent property, but he noted it is private property in back with no easement to provide for an outlet. He added the church has indicated they are not in favor of having a walkway easement in that area. Director Thatcher explained that when the project was first proposed, Bruce Anderson had advised they analyze the issue of putting a walkway in. Fie added the Park Board had reviewed the proposal and he had received a memo from Mary Saarion, dated November 24, stating that the Park and Rac Zommission feels the walkway does not meet the objectives of the Park and Rec Department,but did note there is an opening in the fence that people do walk through. There is also a storm sewer easement, but it is not mentioned as a bike path or walkway. He also noted if the pathway was p,it in, it would have to go across the church parking lot, which•would cause problems. He added the Planning Commission had discussed it briefly but not reached a decision. Councilmember Quick noted that at one time there was an area there that the Park and Rec Department used as a baseball field and playground, and it was also used by the school and had a great deal of traffic going through the opening in the fence. Councilmember Haake stated she does not see a need for the pathway, and she could forsee problems happening with it as the City encountered with the Gale/Yost addition. She added she does not feel this would be a good expenditure of money for the City now. Councilmember Blanchard stated this is private property, bordering on private property, and she does not see the need to put a walkway through. Motion/Second: Haake/Blanchard that the Council does not feel there is a need for a bike path or pedestrial walkway on the northerly portion of the Red Oak Subdivision, between lots 8 and 9. 5 ayes 0 nays Councilmember Haake asked for a clarification of the Ramsey County plan for the capital improvement program, Motion Motion Carr Al Mounds view City Counci S' r. November 24, 1986 9, Regular Meeting i� h i Page Four ----------------------- 6 -- ifs=y ------ 9-------------- as far as the resurfacing of County Road I is concerned. Director Thatcher reported they have indicated they will be resurfacing the existing surface to the existing width only. Motion/Second: Haake/Hankner to direct Staff to send a letter to Ramsey County, asking for a reclarification in writing and for the County to confirm the Council's understanding that County Road I would be resurfaced from the west county line to Silver Lake Road, on the existing roadway only. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Attorney Meyers reported the City had been heard 11. Report of on November 13 in Federal court, before Judge y Diana Murphy, regarding the preliminary injunction against Williams Pipeline Company, and he reviewed the positions presented by the County, Williams Pipeline Company, and the City. He added the issue comes down to proper notice end whether the Federal government is acting diligently, and he hopes for a decision soon. Attorney Meyers reported the Highway 10 Radiator Rbpair Shop case will be heard soon, possibly before the end of the year. He added the issue gets down to the home occupation question. Attorney Meyers advised Judge Connelly would like to come before the Council, to meet them, and he believes the Judge will be at the first regular meeting in December. Councilmember Quick reported the committee esta- 12. Reports of Councilmember blished to determine the direction of the Park and had on November 21 and recommends Councilmember Rec Department met going with Mary Saarion as Park and Rec Director. Quick Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported he will be giving a memo to the Council next week, proposing that Mary Saarion become Park. and Rec Director, and Shari Linke become Administrative Assistant of that department. Fie explained they would hire an individual on a part-time basis for the senior citizen program, and would save approximately $20,000 per year with these changes in position. Councilmember Iiankner reported the Commissicn on Councilmember Hankner Pipeline Safety will be meeting November 25 to present their recommendations to the Governor, Mounds View City Council November 24 1986 Regular Meeting .ry '<:. i..: ti s Page Five Clerk/Administratcr Pauley asked Councilmember Hankner to write an article for the next newsletter. She agreed, and added she would be providing information to the Council as soon as it is available. Councilmember Haake had no report. Councilmember Haake Councilmember Blanchard reported she had attended Councilmember the flag dedication ceremony at Pinewood School on Blanchard November 19, along with Councilmember-Elect Diane Wuori and Clerk/Administrator Pauley, and enjoyed it very much. Mayor Linke explained the Mounds View Lions Club was active in seeing that all the schools in the district had flags for all the classrooms. Mayor Linke reported he had spoken to Commissioner Mayor Linke McCarty regarding the Cou.nty's plans to remove the stoplights on County Road I by Pinewood School, and was told the County is now considering keeping them. He stated he spoke to school superintendent Burt Nygren about the possibility of sharing the $16,000 cost, and he felt it was a good possibility. Clerk/Administrator Pauley added the County had approved �- the lights earlier in the day. He stated he would contact Mr. Nygren and let him know. Mayor Linke reported there is an opening on the Planning Commission and will be at least four openings on the Park and Rec Commission, and asked that anyone interested contact a member of the Council, or call City Hall, for information and an application. He added they would like to be able to fill the positions by the first of the year. Clerk/Administrator Pauley requested the executive 13. Report of sessions which are scheduled before each Council Clerk/ meeting be eliminated, and rather called as needed. Administrator Mayor Linke replied he would rather leave them as scheduled, and then cancel if one is not required, which would eliminate having to post the information each time. Clerk/Administrator Pauley requested an executive session be scheduled for 8:30 PM on December 15, to discuss labor contract issues. t' Mounds View City Council November 24, 1986 - Page Six Regular Meeting ----- 9 --------------------- ------- ---------- r- :J, Motion/Second: Quick/Hankner to schedule an executive session at 8.30 PM on December 15, 1986. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carries Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported he had received a letter from Commission McCarty, informing him of a meeting at the Arden Hills City Hall at 7:30 PM on December 2, of District 1 municipalities, to - discuss the Ramsey County capital improvement program, and they would like as many elected officials there as possible. Mayor Linke adjourned the meeting at 8:00 PM. 14. Adjournment -- Respectfully submitted, Donald F. Pauley Clerk/Administrator 31 MEMO TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: CLERK -ADMINISTRATOR DATE: NOVEMBER 24, 1986 SUBJECT: PARKS, RECREATION AND FORESTRY DIRECTOR POSITION AND DEPARTMENTAL REORGANIZATION As you know, shortly after the announcement of Bruce Anderson's resignation, you appointed a committee made up of Councilmember Quick, Parks and Recreation Commissioner/Councilmember Elect Wuori and myself to investigate and evaluate the various options available to the City for the leadership and/or reorganization of the Parks, Recreation and Forestry Department. During the past three months, the Committee has met with Bruce Anderson and Nick Temali, Cirector of the F.dgewood Community Center, and discussed proposals from Mary Saarion and Maurie Anderson, New Brighton Parks and Recreation Director, copies attached. It became clear with little discussion on the part of the members of the Committee, particularly after receiving Mary Saarion's memo dated November S, 1986, copy attached, that the best proposal for the Committee was that of Mary Saarion's. Mary has proved to be very capable of handling the Department Director's job; Sharie has handled many of the duties she would receive as a permanent assignment under Mary's proposal; and the promotion of experienced and dedicated employees is sure to be a boost to employee morale and motivation. The Committee unanimously recommends that the following actions _ be taken by the City Council to implement the appointment of a Parks, Recreation and Forestry Director and reorganize the Department. 1. Appoint Mary Saarion Parks, Recreation and Forestry Director retroactive to December 1, 1986 at an annual salary of $32,000. Pursuant to City Code, a sir, month probationary period will occur with this promotion. 2. Appoint Sharon Links Administrative Assistant for the Parks, Recreation and Forestry Department retroactive to December 1, 1986 at an annual salary of $20,000. Pursuant to City Code, a six month probationary period will occur with this promotion. 3. Eliminate the positions of Recreation Supervisor and Parks, Recreation and Forestry Secretary. 4. Create the part-time position of Senior Citizen/Trips Cuurdinator at an annual salary of $6,000 and authorize Mary Saarion to interview and recommend to the Council an individual to fill the position. The Committee is confident that Council approval of these recommendations will provide for the continuation of an excellent Parks, Recreation and Forestry Department in the City of Mounds View. DFP/sll cc: :ark and Recreation Commission Mary Saarion MEMO 10: Committee for Parks and Recreation FROM: Mary Saarion, Acting Director Parks, Recreation and Forestry DATE: November 5, 1986 RE: Parks Maintenance Proposal I am auare of the proposal submitted by New Brighton Parks and Recreation Director Maurle Anderson. Since park maintenance has always been a challenge in the City Of maintenance withothesCityuoflNewnBright Buess rat the ighton attracvproposal for shared park to add to my insmeans ity park maintenance as well as discussissuespertaingto theNeu Brightonproposal. The one element that Mounds Vleu lacks in park maintenan a is a specifically anwo Is apars fremn; one who is ndkoneowhoa has vision forabeautifulpparks. I believe attuned no thatwehavesucheaests person on payroll now. Rick Uriskey, City Forester, is a 2/5 time employee she+ed with the City of Neu Brighton. Mr. Wriskey has excellent qualities for a Park Foreman. A survey was conducted by myself as to the number of surrounding cities that employee persons uhose only duties are forestry. Only two out Of 13 surrounding cities employ such a single duty pc:ttion. All other tree inspectors have other duties such as park maintenance, Superintendent of Public Works, street personnel, Maintenance Director, and other. It is a luxury to have Richard Uriskey as sole forester for our small City. I feel that the City can benefit two -fold by promoting Mr. Uriskey to Parks Foreman to include supervision of Parks maintenance as well as perform tree inspections. With the supervision of parks maintenance, I am Uriskey couldnfident sprovidewill ethenupgrade leadershipnnecessarycfor themjcbnduty. that Rick he iThs slforradditionalldutiescassigned atoiRichard Wriskey, asepromoted T sal ost any to Parks Foreman. This salary information will give you an idea of current compensations: The Forester's icurrent full-tibenefitsme salary Mounds View and Neu Brighton i$ The Forester has been employed for the City of Mounds View on a 2/5 time joint powers agreement for seven (7) years. To keep this information in perspective, let me give you figures on the bProgram enefits ore $13.81/perohour. This temployee has s salary rbeen ywith Is $the 7City for 25.13 cIncluding ten (10) years and is a full-time employee. It is my opinion that additional job duties given to the Forester need not Include a pay raise due to the fact that the wage structure is high in ComparablenWorthtstudies. u(This aexcludes dany dadjustments higher or adetermined qual to anton and to oher Jobshich by the Comparable Work heirarchy). This salary information will give you an idea of current compensations: The Forester's current full-time salary paid by Mounds View and Neu Brighton is $32,772.50 including benefits or $15.76/hour. The Forester has been employed for the City of Mounds View on a 2/5 time joint( — powers agreement for seven (7) years. To keep this Information in perspective, let me give you figures on the Program Supervisor's position. This salary currently is $28,725.13 including benefits or $13.81 per hour. This employee has been with the City for ten (10) years and is a full-time employee. It is my opinion that additional Job duties given to the Forester need not include a pay raise due to the fact that the wage structure is high in comparislon to other Jobs which are considered higher or equal to Stanton and Comparable Uorth studies. (This excludes any adjustments determined by the Comparable Uork heirarchy). ML•'Mo 'ro: Park and Recreation Department Evaluation Committee FROMI Mary Saarion, Recreation/AthieLic Supervisor DATE: October 7, 1996 RE: Re -organization Proposal This proposal is submitted to the Evaluation Committee to review for the re -organization of the Mounds View Parks, Recreation and Forestry Department. I propnse that the City of Mounds View continue with the Depart- ment of Parks, Recreation and Forestry with the following person- nel. Director of Parka, Recreation and Forestry - Full time Programmer/Secretary - Full time City Forester - 2/5 time, joint powers position Aquatics Supervisor - 1/2 time, joint powers position Senior Citizen/Trips Coordinator, 1/3 time position As you can see in the attached job descriptions, I have combined the duties of the Parks, Recreation and Forestry Director and Program Supervisor and the Secretary and Program Supervisor duties. The City Forester and Aquatics Supervisor job descrip- tions would remain as written. A new position would be the Senior Citizen/Trips Coordinator and that job description is attached. There are several reasons for combining job duties. It is my estimation that the City of Mounds View is 85 percent completed with its park development. Completion of yearly projects as per the capital improvement plans will provide for safe, developed and maintained parks. Most of these are single tasks and would not require an exorbinate amount of planning. I foresee that the Director of Parks would be mainly responsible for park mainten- ance issues including tl:e replacement of equipment, upkeep of facilities, additions of new equipment and the addition of any facilities which would meet with the trends of the times. There will also be 3 need for grantsmanship. This can be fulfilled efficiently because of the previous work that has been submitted. Most of the time will be spent on writing specifications, bidding contractors and overseeing the jobs. For this reason, I feel that 30 percent of the Director's position will be spent for park development in the City of Mounds View. In relation to the recreational activities, I feel that the pro- gramming of activities in the City has probably hit a saturation point. Currently there is excellent participation in the pro- grams that are offered, and additional numbers of programs are not needed in the City at this time. I think that the change of activities will always be necessary, and therefore, programming will always be an essential element. -a - New ideas and new fads will be born, and of course the recreational activities will have to reflect the trends of the times. Likewise, recreational activities will have to adapt to the population changes, needs and interests of the community as they develop. This is an ongoing task. There are many established programs in the City such as adult athletics, exercise, and youth programs. These programs require maintenance, and management to equal about 30 percent of the programming time. Sharie Linke, the current secretary, can easily provide the necessary programming duties to cover many of the classes, programs, and activities that are already established, nuch as gymnastics, tumbling, bridge, exercise classes, dance, tennis, golf, etc. These classes require about 3U percent of programming time also. The duties of the secretary often are inter -related to the programmer duties as far as development cf evaluations, flyers, brochures, publicity, time sheets, job descriptions, contracts for instructors and a number of other tasks that the secretary already provides. For, this reason, the Programmer/Secretary position is a natural position to be combined. New programs require additional considerations such as needs and interest, evaluations, philosophical implications, new curriculum, staff training and tighter supervision. New programs constitute about 30 percent of programming time. This element of programming would be under the Director's realm of duties. The City Forester and Aquatics Supervisor position is functioning well and should remain the same. The new additional 1/3 time employee position which is the Senior Citizen/Trips Coordinator is a necessary position because of the growing Senior Citizen population and their receptiveness to recreational activities and eagerness to participate in programs. This position can provide a great service to the City by providing our Senior Citizens the programs that they yearn for. This is the "meat" of the program that I submit to you. I would like to have the opportunity to discuss this proposal because I feel that this reorganization of the department is the best way for this department to provide the City with an excellent Parksr Recreation and Forestry program. I.have been employed by the City of Mounds View in this department for 10 years and I believe that I am aware of the needs and wants of the community. I also feel that I have insight as to how this department can work as effectively and efficiently as possible to provide qutstanding services. Please consider this proposal and do not hesitate to call me at home or the office for further explanation. I appreciate your consideration of the proposal. NS/sI Mounds View Parks, Recreation and Forestry Department TIHE MANAGEMENT PLAN Of. the duties required by each position, the estimated percentago of time spent for each is given below. DIRECTOR OF PARKS, RECREATION & FORESTRY: 30 percent - Parks 30 percent - Programming 40 percent - Administration PROGRAMMER/SECRETARY: 30 percent - Programming 70 percent - Secretarial SENIOR CITIZEN/TRIPS COORDINATOR: 60 percent - Sr. Citizen Programs 40 percent - Trips (Planning & Chaperoning) 18 FORESTER: 100 percent - Reforestation and Disease Control and City beautification AQUATICS SUPERVISOR: 100 percent - Pool and beach aquatic programming and and administration 4- Cost Estimation for the Proposed Department Personnel POSITION SALARY BENEFITS TOTAL Fulltime Director $32,000.00 $5,578.00 $ 37,578.00 Fulltime Programmer/Secretary $20,000.00 $4,240.00 $ 24,210.00 1/3 time Sr. Citizen/ Tripe Coordinator $ 6,000.00 $ 669.00 $ 6,669.00 2/5 time Forester $13,109.00 Inclusive $ 13,109.00 1/2 time Aquatics Supervisor $ 9,500.00 $2,064.25 $ 11 564.25 'TOTAL PROPOSED SALARIES...$ 9 Existing Personnel Costs POSITION SALARY BENEFITS TOTAL Fulltime Director $35,698.00 $5,977.83 $ 41,675.83 Fulltime Ath/Rec Supervisor $22,750.00 $4,546.62 $ 27,296.62 Fulltime Secretary $16,349.00 $3,832.91 $ 20,181.91 2/5 time Forester $13,109.00 Inclusive $ 13,109.00 1/2 time Aquatics Supervisor $ 9,500.00 $2,064.25 $ 11,564.25 TOTAL CURRENT SALARIES...$1I3,027. The above figures show the current personnel and payment struc- ture and the proposed payment and personnel structure. Here are seven major benefits to this personnel structure. 1. This proposal saves the City $20,667.35 per year in salaries and benefits while guaranteeing the same quality service and an escalation In services for the increasing senior citizen population. 2. This proposal promotes two City employees who have earned advancement, in my estimation, due to the longevity, devotion and quality of services which has been rendered. 3. This proposal offers new challenges for two employees and a promotion of this nature is sure to breath new motivating factors for both. 4. This proposal allows two fulltime employees to cover the office administration and day to day operations with the addition of the three part-time support personnel. 5. This proposal retains the departmeiit head as a full-time _ administrative leader who can keep our City's needs first and foremost as a priority. The department head also is the key position to offer stability, supervision, and leadership on a full-time basis to the department staff.. For this reason, it is most important that this position remains a full-time position. 6. It is my guarantee that this personnel structure can retain the current quality in leisure programming, park development and office administration as currently offered. 7. I am positive that this is the best structure for the Parks, Recreation and Forestry Department and the City of Mounds View. I am devoted to make it work. �. 4_ mew n t� ro prighton t., `o October 24, 1986 G w i a w z O H to U w n: O z ¢ a To: Donald Pauley, Mounds View City Administrator From: Maurice AndersdOAOector of Parks and Recreation The following is a brief description of how I envision the organization of. a Mounds ViewiNew Brighton Park and Recreation Department. The organization I envision is not truly a joint department but is rather an extension of our present system of shared staffing. City Administrator Citv Administrator Park Board - Dir. of Parks & Recreation - Park Board New Brighton Mounds View Assistant Director Full Time Assistant Director Full Time 1/2 Time Prog. SuperV.(Seniors) 1/4 Time Prog. Superv.(Summer) 1/2 Time Aquatics/Wellness Sup.J-M41/2 Time Aquatics/Wellness Sup: 3/5 Forester shprea 2/5 Forester 1/4 Time Prog. Superv.(Summer) Secretary Full Time Secretary Full Time Each city would maintain its present office and existing staff, the two full time program supervisors would be promoted to assistant directors. The director would spend three days per week in New Brighton and two days in Mounds View and would attend all park board meetingsand council meetings as necessary. The assistant directors would be expected to cover some of these meetings in the event of illness, vacation or scheduling con- flicts. The two offices would share a communications system allowing residents or staff to communicate with either office by dialing a single number. Program registration could eventually be inte- grated with shared computer terminals and a dedicated line allowing registration to be taken at either office for jointly sponsored programs. -2- r The following is a brief description of the responsibilities of each of the staff positions. Director Resposible for overall supervision of both depart- ments, Park planning and development and inter -agency coordination. Assistant Directors Responsible for development and supervision of recreation programs with authority to assume director's duties as assigned. 1/2 Time Proaram SuPervisor(Senior, New Brighton) The duties of this position would not change. Forester No change Aquatics/Wellness This position would continue to be shared 50-50 but would be restructured to include development and coordination of an extensive community wellness program. 1/4 - 1/2 Time Proaram Supervisors(2) Each department would }:ire an additional programmer during spring and summer months. This would be needed to replace programming previously accomplished by the Director and Assistant Director. Secretary No change in present staffing. Advantages of the proposed system are as follows: -Reduced costs to both cities: C Mounds View Present Projected Director $35,000 Director $18,400 Program Superv. $22,500 Assistant Director $29,92B $57,500 1/4 Prog. Supv. $51,966 New Brighton Present Projected Director $41,600 Director $27,600 Program Superv. 522,500 Assistant Director $29,928 $64,100 1/4 Prog. Supv. $ 3,640 $61,168 -nigh quality staff can be attracted and retained -Each city retains existing staff and department identity -Potential inpact ofcmparable worth adjustments on program supervisors wages will be mitigated -Increased coordination of recreation programs will be possible L.. �;a� ;Z' C co MEMO TO: IAYOR AND CITY COUN i FROM: CLERK-ADMINISTRATO DATE: NOVEMBER 19, 1986 SUBJECT: EAST METRO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL As you may recall, Mr. Ken Kixmoeller, Economic Development Manager of the St. Paul Area Chamber of Commerce recently appeared before the Mounds View City Council regarding our possible membership in the East Metro Economic Development Council. Attached is a copy of a letter from Mr. James A. Stolpestad, Vice Chairman of the East Metro Economic Development Council to Mayor Lir.ke regarding our possible membership in this organization and a Joint Venture Proposal outlining the details of this organization. Essentially, my discussions with Mr. Kixmoeller revealed that the primary purpose, at this time, for the existence of the East Metro Economi^ Development Council is to provide a marketing effort for those cities participating in this Council on the East Side of the Metropolitan Area to bring attention to the benefits of development in this area of the Twin Cities and to attempt to counter -balance the signifi- cant amount of development occurring in the western portions of the Metropolitan Area. To accomplish this purpose, they intend to print brochures to advertise this area of the Twin Cities, provide tours for real estate developers and brokers, and target market this area to developers who have voiced an interest in developing in this portion of the Twin Cities. - The cost for participating in this organization can range from $2,500 to $5,000 per year per community with the level of contribution established by the individual community based upon their own estimate of the value that this organization would be to them. Staff has given significant consideration to the benefits vs. disbenefits of belonging to this organization and has been unable to identify any clear reasons why membership should not be entered into except for the fact that money is currently not budgeted for this purpose in the 1987 fiscal year. Benefits that would be derived from membership in this organization would include a higher level of visibility among those decision -makers in the areas of economic development as well as participation in an intensified marketing program that would create a greater visibility for the community. Staff has no recommendation with respect to this matter and requests Council direction. DFP/mjs Attachment: 0 SAINT PAUL AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 600 NORTH CENTRAL TOWER, 445 MINNESOTA STREET SAINT PAUL, MN 55101 619/922-5561 November 18, 1986 Hon. Jerry Links, Mayor City of Mounds View 2319 Knoll Drive Mounds View, MN 55112 Dear Mayor Linke: This Is a formal request for the City of Mounds View to become a Partner In the Saint Paul East Metro Economic Development (SE0) Council, a Joint venture of the Chambers of Commerce and municipalities In the eastern half of the Twin Cities metropolitan area for enonomlc develoment promotion. The plan for this Council Is described In the attached "Joint Venture Proposal." Your community's contribution to this Joint venture would be: 1. To provide economic development Information about the community, such as demographics, current developments, development sites available, and other Information relevant .to handling development prospects. 2. To provide Information about the process of economic development In your community, such as the type of development that your community encourages, the types of assistance that the municipality provides to development prospects, and the steps a prospect must go through to get a development approved. 3. To provide financial support to the joint venture at a suggested rate of $2,500 (minimum) to $5,000 per year, budgeted for at least three (3) years. First year funds should be remitted to the "Saint Paul East Metro Marketing Fund", In care of the Saint Paul Area Chamber of Commerce, at the above address. L" Mayor Jerry Links November 18, 1986 If you have any questions, or If there will be a City Council hearing to consldsr this request at xhlch you would like a representative present, please advise Ken Klxmoeller or Eileen Mlx at 223-5004, or your local Chamber. Thank you for your consideration of this request, I look forward to the Clty of Mounds View's participation In this landmark joint venture. Sincerely, (/J/ am A. Stolpestad Vice Chairman, Economic Development and Convener, Saint Paul East Metro Economic Development Council enclosure: Saint Paul East Metro Economic Development Council Joint Venture Proposal cc: City Manager/Administrator V CONTENTS: SAINT PAUL EAST METROPOLITAN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Council A JOINT VENTURE PROPOSAL Between the East Metropolitan Chambers of Commerce and Municipalities for Economic Development Promotion 1. Purpose for s Joint Venture 2 2. Organization Structure. 3 Affiliation 3 Management Structure 3 Staffing 4 4. Goals and Strategies 5 3. Proposed Budget and Funding. 7 4. Action required to move forward. 9 Revision 7, 11/17/86, Page 1 --- East Metropolitan Joint Venture Proposal — 1. PURPOSE: An East Metro Economic Development Joint Venture The purpose of the proposed coalition is to have an organization that can act In the Joint economic development Interests of the East Metro communities. These communities are defined as those in Ramsey, Washington and Dakota Counties which consider themselves to be Saint Paul suburbs, plus Saint Paul Itself. The general purpose of the Council will be to perform business development marketing for the greater East Metro community. This Includes market planning, promotion efforts, and prospect handling. A promotion fund will be set up In Joint venture between the chambers of commerce and municipal governments In the East Metro area. This fund would be used: First, to Implement an Immediate program of marketing the entire East Metro region to Commercial and Industrial real estate brokers and developers, companies In the Metro area that are contemplating Immediate expansion or relocation, and residential real estate brokero and builders. Second, to establish and Implement a long-range program of business retention and attraction, to ensure continuing growth. Revision 7, 11117/86, Page 2 --- East Metropolitan Joint Venture Proposal -- ' 2. Organizing the Joint Ventura. Affiliation The SEED Council would be affiliated with the various chambers of commerce In the East Metro area, In conjunction with the communities themselves. it would be organized as a "public - private partnership" reporting In function to the boards of directors of the area chambers of commerce. This structure would have the following advantages: The chambers bring the voluntary efforts of top area executives, Industrial development leads from several sources, an In -place long-range development planning structure, and existing organizations which cross municipal borders. Independent status would allow for fund raising possibilities beyond existing chamber members, and a greater degree of management flexibility than would otherwise be possible. Accounting support for the Council would also be provided by the Saint Paul Area Chamber. Management Structure A Management Committee would oversee the organization. It will consist of 15 to 16 key leaders from the Chambers and the communities (elected officials, city managers, economic development commission chairs, etc) that would be agreeable to all of the partners. The assumption Is that It would be broadly geographically representational. This Committee would report to the various chambers' boards. Revision 7, 11/17/86, Page 3 — East Metropolitan Joint Venture Proposal --- Staff Initial staffing would be provided by the Saint Paul Area Chamber of Commerce, Including Its manager of economic development, who would serve as the primary staff person coordinating the market planning and execution. In addition, the current economic development secretary/Information specialist would support these activities. The Informal East Metro planners group has offered to provide some technical and Information support to this effort. In addition, the staffs of the other partner chambers would supply as much assistance as possible. Anticipating the Increase In workload that this activity would create, It will likely be necessary to Increase staff, either by a loaned executive, or by hiring through the promotion fund. The positions that need to be filled. In order of Importance are: Economic Development Assistant — supplements and supports the activities of the existing manager. Primarily responsible for handling prospects In all stapes of the selling cycle. r Secretary — for all of the above Individuals. (Which would free the secretary/Information specialist from above to give proper attention to maintenance of the economic Information data base). Revision 7, 11/17/86, Page 4 -- East Metropolitan Joint Venture Proposal — 3. Goals & Strategies Initial goals for the coalition would be to: 1. Establish an identity for the region. Portray the region as the Greatest area of significant opportunity In the Twin Cities Metropolitan area today. 2. Demonstrate our commitment to accomplish significant change In Twin Cities development. 3. Sell the many dttractive amenities In the community, such as executive -quality housing In the area, attractive land for more development, better traffic conditions, and much more. 4. Demonstrate current demand for commerclal and Industrial development In the area. This would be accomplished by: -> Creating professional marketing materials for the East Metro area, such as brochures, advertisements, and video productions. -> Organizing selllog tours to educate for real estate developers/brokers and residential home builders/brokers. -> Developing and presenting the long-range marketing plan for commercial and Industrial development to significant developers to accelerate real estate development plans. -> Organizing "one-on-one" selling to specific, targeted developers, companies, or both, which potentially have a substantial, positive Impact on the economic development of the area. d Revision 7, 11/17/86, Page 5 --- East Metropolitan Joint Venture Proposal — Long -Term Growth In order to ensure that the East Metro area continues to grow at a healthy rate, a long-term strategy for development must be developed and Implemented. The goals of such a program would be: �> To establish an ongoing program of assisting and ratalning tho businesses that are already here; for It Is from them that long-term growth In Jobs will comp. �> To Ida,itlfy Industrlae that provide Job growth opportunities and develop a program to market the East Metro area to them. �> To provide a strong venture capital community for new company growth. -> To target specific areas of opportunity, such as the attraction of foreign capital to the area. �> Other economic development Initiatives, as they are Identified. Revision 7, 11/17/86, Page 6 U — East Metropolitan Joint Venture Proposal -- 4. Proposed Budget and Funding Activities Video production development and distrlbutlon. Initial cost estimate E50,000. Update Cost estimate $10,000. Bus tours for real estate developers/brokers. Aproximate cost $1000/tour. Advertising In key Twin Cities business and real estate Journals. One ad In each of four (4) Journr'e. Aproximate cost $3,500. Brochure and direct mall promotion development and execution. Target audience 1000 X S6/plece, total $6,000. Misc. sales budget for selected direct selling opportunities, assistant, and related expenses, total $40,000/yr. Budget Item Video Production• Bus Tours Advertising Impressions Direct Mall Impressions• Misc. Budget TOTALS w/1987 0/1988 •/1989 1/50.000 0/0 U/10,000 8/ 6,000 6/ 6,000 6/ 6,000 8/28,000 6/21,000 6/21,000 4/24.000 4/24,000 4/24,000 30,000 32,000 34,000 132,000 $3,000 95,00p •Potentially donated or partially donated. e£ , Revision 7, 11/17/86, Pegs 7 -- East Metropolitan Joint Venture Proposal - Funding The following are the sources to fund the above effort: Cemmllnitle9: Minimum cont•'butlon - $2,500 Average contr '7ution - $3,500 Major Corporations: Minimum Contribution - $5,000 Average Contrlbutlon - $6.000 -Utilities -Newspaper -Major corporations -Real estate development firms -Commercial real estate firms -Financial Institutions Small Corporations/ Land Owners: Minimum Contribution - $ 500 or S10/acre. Yearly Funding Group • e $ 1987 1988 1989 MINIMUMS Communities 16 a 2.500 40,000 40,000 40,000 Major Corps. 8 B 5,000 30.000 30,000 30,000 Small Corps. 20 ® 500 10,000 10,000 10,000 TOTAL 42 80,000 60,000 80,000 AVERAGE Communities 16 ® 3,000 54,000 54,000 54,000 Major Corps. 10 a 5,500 55,000 55,000 55,000 Small Corps. 25 9 500 12,500 12,500 12,500 TOTAL 53 121,500 121,600 121,500 HIGH Communities 20 a 3,500 70,000 70,000 70,000 Major Corps. 15 ® 6,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 Small Corps. 40 0 500 20,000 20,000 20,000 TOTAL 75 180,000 180,000 130,000 With the exception of the A4slstant position, the Saint Paul Area Chamber of Commerce will provide staff salaries and overhead for the forseeable future. Revision 7, 11/17/86, Page 8 a --- East Metropolitan Joint Venture Proposal -- S. Actions Required to Move Forward. Month Activity 1. Design/Print Brochure for Council. / Request funding from various communities. & Assemble the management committee. / Solicit funds from land owners, brokers, etc. by mall. 2. Begin proress of selecting advertising agency. Gain commitment for the project from communities. Solicit Corporate commitment and contributions. Secure Interim funding. 3. Choose advertising agency. Begin marketing material production (Video/Print). Testlfy, or otherwise obtain community commitments. Reflne/galn agreement on Initial marketing plan. Collect small and large corporate funding commitments. 4. Continue production of marketing materials. Finalize marketing plan. 5. Complete marketing materials. Implement marketing plan: Promotion blitz. First media advertisements. First direct mall ads. S. Second media advertlaments. Prospect handling. Bus tour preparation. 7. First bus tour. More promotional activities. 4 Revision 7, 11/17/86, Page 9 MEMO TO: Mounds view City Council FROM: Mary Baarion, Acting Director ,I� f Parks, Recreation and Forestry IM,_ DATE: November 20, 1986 RE: 1967 City Newsletter Bid Opening Bid proposals and specifications were sent to aprpoXimately 24 perspective bidders. The bid opening was held Thursday, November 20 at 10:30 a.m. at City Hall. Six companies submitted proposals. The bid proposals ranged from a low bid of $50.50 per page to a high of $82.57 per page. This reflects an annual cost ranging froin $8,888.00 to $14,532.00. It is recommended that the low bid of $50.50 per page or 08,888.00 be awarded to Advanced Printing. Advanced Printing served as the newsletter printer for the City of Mounds View in 1985 and 1986. Staff has been very pleased with the quality and promptness of their work. The cooperation and service dedication of this company has been excellent. Staff feels confident that such a great working relationsip will continue in 1987. If you have any questions regarding this recommendation, please call me at 784-3055, ext. 520. RECOMMENDATION: To Authorize staff to enter into a formal contract agreement with Advanced Printing at the rate of $50.50 per page or total printing cost of $8,886.00 for the printing of the 1987 Mounds view City Newsletter with funds to come from the City's general fund. Ms/sl L. MEMO TO: Clerk -Administrator and City Council FROM: Director of Public Works/Community Development DATE: November 24, 1986 SUBJECT: REPAIR OF JUDICIAL DITCH NO. 1, BRANCH NO. 5 Survey work for the subject project is completed. I will bring one set of preliminary plans which includes ten pages to the agenda session. The survey work confirms one of my fears about this project. The survey work indicates that if Judicial Ditch No. 1, Branch No. 5, is repaired or cleaned to it original cross section and grade, the problems will not totally be solved because Judicial Ditch No. 1 from approximately the intersection of Sherwood Road and Jackson Drive to approximately Hillview Road and Quincy Street has also silted in, if we repair Judicial Ditch No. 1, Branch No. 5, from approximately the intersection of County Road I and Bona Road to approximately the intersection of Sherwood Road and Jackson Drive without repairing the portion of Judicial Ditch No.l mentioned above, water will back up and stand in the ditch area all the way through Greenfield Park. I do not belei.ve we will be happy with the results of the repair project if we only clean Judicial Ditch No. 1, Branch No. 5. The amount of repair work necessary to clean Judicial Ditch No. 1, Branch No. 5, is less than originally anticipated. We may be able to clean Judicial Ditch No. 1 and Judicial Ditch No. 1, Branch No. 5, for the same amount of money as originally estimated to repair Judicial Ditch No. 1, Branch No. 5. Therefore, I recommend directing the Engineer to survey Judicial Ditch No. 1 from approximately Sherwood Road and Jackson Drive to approximately Hillview Road and Quincy Street. At Hillview Road and Quincy Street, Judicial Ditch No. 1 enters a storm sewer and flows to Rice Creek. The schedule for this project is tight. We plan to publish the advertisement for bid on December 10, 1986, and open bids on Friday, January 9, 1987. RECOMMENDATION: I recommend authorizing Donohue & Associates to survey Judicial Ditch No. I from approximately Sherwood Road and Jackson Drive to approximately Hillview Road and Quincy Street. SWT/bac MEMO TO: Clerk -Administrator and City Council FROM: Director of Public Works/Community Development // / 4F DATE: November 24, 1986 /U" SUBJECT: EXISTING DRIVEWAY RECONSTRUCTION Staff was requested to study the possibility of allowir:g existing driveways to be reconstructed even if thsy are non -conforming with the City Code in relation to new driveway construction. I have discussed this issue with Attorney Meyers. He states that it is possible to do the above. He indicated that we may want to have some criteria as to when a non -conforming driveway can be reconstructed to its existing size and shape. The criteria could be as follows: 1. Was a previous permit granted that allowed the non -conforming use? 2. How did the driveway become non -conforming? 3. How many years has it been non -conforming? I am sure there are other criteria that we could come up with. ® Attorney Meyers states that the Code could be structured such that new driveways meet the existing Code and thet driveway reconstruction be allowed to match the existing driveway provided that the criteria that we come up with is satisfied. This memo is presented to ask for your direction. SWT/bac MEMO TO: Clerk -Administrator and City Council FROM: Director of Public Wor;:s/Community Development Vlj� 7 DATE: November 25, 1986 SUBJECT: LIABILITY INSURANCE FOR APARTMENT OWNERS Councilmember Blanchard requested that Staff study the possibility of requiring apartment owners to file with the City of Mounds View a certificate of insurance for landlords general liability. This would include the liability for fire damage. City Code 93.15, Multiple Dwelling Registration, states that the owner of a multiple unit shall annually apply for a renewal of the Certificate of Registration on or before March 30th of each year. I have discussed this issue with Attorney Meyers. One of the requirements that the apartment owner must meet prior to receiving his annual renewal of registration could be that he provide the City with a landlord's general liability certificate of insurance. The City could then keep this certificate of insurance on file. Approximately 99 percent of all apartment owners have general liability insurance because if they did not, they would or could be liable for large sums of money if they were sued or there was damage to their property. Apartment owners would be foolish if they did not have this general liability insurance. If you decide to make the landlord's general liability certificate of insurance a condition of approval of the annual renewal of registration, the time staff will spend on apartment registration and filing will increase. I present this memo for your review, discussion and direction. SWT/bac T0: Mayor & Council FROM: Finance Director -Treasurer Brager DATE: November 24, 1986 RE: ADDITIONAL PREMIUM FOR WORKER'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE POLICY In a previous memorandum costs of additional premiums for past worker's compensation insurance policies were discussed. Those additional premiums were billed as a consequence of audits of payroll records for the policy periods involved. Copies of those audits were provided our present worker's compensation insurance carrier. Our carrier has billed the City an additional $5,922 for the present policy period and cited the aud.+'.ts as evidence that the current premium was too low. I have discussed this matter with our insurance agent and we have come to the conclusion that the City owes this additional premium to the insurance company. Premiums are being paid on an installment basis. The additional premium is due in three installments payable on November 1, December 1 and January I. Since two of these premiums are due in 1986 the insurance budget will be over by $3,995. Therefore, I request Council authorize a budget transfer in this amount from the Contingency Account to the Insurance Account in that amount. RECOMMENDATION: Authorize a transfer of $3,995 from Account 100-120-4910 Contingency to Account 100-190-4480 Insurance for additional worker's compensation insurance premiums. DB/ds MEMO TO: Clerk -Administrator and City Council FROM: Director of Public Works/Community Developmenjtv DATE: November 25, 1986 SUBJECT: PETITION FOR STREET LIGHT ON THE EAST SIDE OF GROVELAND ROAD BETWEEN 8343 AND 8335 GROVELAND ROAD Staff has received a petition from 8 property owners on Groveland Road. They are petitioning the City for a street .fight on the east side of Groveland Road between 8343 and 8335 Groveland Road. Attached please find the following: 1. Petition received 11/14/86 2. Plat map 3. Address map 4. Letter to Authur Zielinski dated 11/7/86 5. Street light installation policy of City The petition meets the requirements of the City policy with one exception. The policy states that the petition shall include signatures of consent of the property owners directly effected by the final location unless it it determined by the City Council that the requested street light is in the interest of preserving the health and safety of residents of the area. The property owner at 8334 Groveland Road would not sign the petition because he did not want to have light coming in his windows according to Mr. Zielinski. The property at 8334 Groveland Road is directly across the street from he proposed street light. RECOMMENDATION: I recommend declaring that the proposed street light is in the interest of preserving health and safety of the residents in the area and install a hood to keep the light away from the house at 8334 Groveland Road. SWT/bac C &4l �:I- �le � A4�& C/ Zfz @Vp ,jj Is 6�buEL�.vO 764-691�3 vMvA rJ iR�'Bf,fr � vI fo 1,61""sV4 TlPfrn'J, 4. 1?it L, bfL V t (tit 9P3 4 NR "Irt-(I` c Hvy p �• r! 170�7 v 8 08) ii1 ' Q''' �J 4; L �8) Gh°• pit I- I] .4 r10 b q�943'• (5) °off rt 3(9Q3) , .-s—e�•llg`�.l9�)�__Q ' I—se.—(zucJO%. °s 'U23) C�"470 5(9)0 49)'t� •s-_z4° 24 4E bl°9) 9N6(°)27rJ.(a1oI-)°rc- c.r (107 c O.r21 CC, 7. ,3t j .35e51 f o ETd) J Q '' l ,,11 �i did s' „ 'ti� ` 42 —'Yes- `i o�Y/\I �T / r PI))to 8 (94� n .4e°m. (44) eo .54°c. uo i �Ir Oo4l t� ' ( AHL 1 ADD. , 7 (95) ° J9 L C��� A Ff tta-� -.B4 m. r r aeo a(96) nr/I^ 4t .37 (s4 Li2 ° �J. ` (io4) w r solo .18 Ii.6 0 ter 1so s° o,l ,Jgl (= L. .xoxs7 ', au i1 7 .t 17,9. Lla 1 e�o.l i .4GH, (12) ego 1009 e° (43) 45 .96 43 Q* 5) ' , 9 59L row ,o _1aIG_.:, d3.X Lt4 .. f°I ,--(_�'.li•+ il, o .l6 oe. Cto) (I°4) I.Iloc. zl° ° r ' �2t) 9 r ,.. 2 ;,� .s4e. (17) ' (13) loos 4.5 °s) 8 (!E) '%1T�' �%Gl NEorl—i �• 180 o (oL} pRD ADD'° izl�.� 3G�°5 + °s (iej 7 (lee GtH Z>_45) Q�s 930 J)' -I [Uo� / rro sl E Cr°r) r o(-°) tl'J " .l7at oa ' J e 19 1E�7 5 ago "r 41 as i ° .42 ac. 08) 43 I (9 () (.4J+•) I. �.LOK. 06 Sr (z l) a a Nip 'S z o. / ..(. c r .]0.3 5] C )__. ) v.1 w 1 73 ec, i.t.l j9eO' 40 I 70 4. St ae. ' ° sl,i.3•' 18 8 ( ) 55 , d sL u c]0a > < 1 a AL_ /9a,N1• , n (4q ts:' 748 t < 9 35 ° 4s; ar - -- ---- ` ((4) 7 1 !�P-P241) o41 , (63) ID 'I5 `+I 4 (2t)_ VILLAGE OF MOUNDS VIEW, - _ _ (z3)12- •____� --- J40. 4 m CI� 7 { 492-'o-- — a• (tB) ,njv 5 . Qt ' • - .' ,J v (34 (31) (4°) (29)�p1]�.0� 2 /i• °f JO 41 eo. 17,770" (4 z) 040 nwY.t°,t7. o•s %4oe1e J R ?ARDEN EN P „w E•(GA DNE 2N A� ? 2 J . 4 8 4 w s 4 )N P9' q°)o 1 (mow) (Jua)i. F GA E PAD ITIO a/ 5 4 3s (54) vJ.0 c, uJ.L e s es QV (37) (.36) ( ) g 2 93].L (7) • " ao 1 DST jO 36 a 4ss.t „(51) (50) (49) (48) (}7)G 1p PDrl..2 i 5 4 31 2�.�I 7 a --3LAPOR-T-4 C33) 'L� ^ .. Ite _ _ 4 3 1 Jiq.et— 4G .4ze�. 10 ° (i,5 1E Gp C� �() _ (ss) , It�. i1. 1¢4 (54) oIL° 7_,111 11film '._ ]° IxE 95 85{{.'� 48_�n� �Q (54) l5J) oe —�° SLAPORT -ODR3. 5 Fir" 11 lo'' (a719 raww h84,1 Um'a. _-C-1 - T Y - _-. .. - O F _ G X1117Y TLOAa �J-'----_ - --- —_ -- -- --ry 90 47 '" 4k L19f ___ n hll a 14 -. J� .__ N n n n04b8 'M9{ B491 i1- r�. 0400 n n .— — NB{tli N' olal h V N N alU2 d495 64M -._ u� _ 80 ( d177 _BiMJ 84Y/ a47ti -T W�1 _N b485 __ - ,H 7: Ba7G _ fil 84Gb tl- . .- d474 -d14B —BiLO fi4rb j LI tl4Lu B46b aN _71 0466 45T 6 1 tl4T B4+] B;5y 6461 INU "bl 043b U465 &ILA Nab )Itl9l40450 Yi8454 A471 A E-7, 8. BJ 459_ b450 U455 - W41 B4S (�q I>s -- 8444 441 8442 a '-- d415 8444 8/43 b491 b445 0144 _ d449 B4•If 0431 BI 84{1 8444 - I6434 8431 _BI_6 - 459 BUe - —.--- M5. d4.341 d#!% J Tryy 9425 b/} 61L 421 _0434 P !Y lL 6422 d4a U•1!0 __ b4:v_ h4l2 84Zti PJI_I-- tl4!'[ d411 tl410 tl421 b413 8426 8419 8400 tl/Is� tl42U 8415 _O{14 yiL> 8128 Q ' 04M 8401 9419� Y{1v 8420 _ tl!J! .4 66 9405 -840{ ails_ -tlIr18 fl7f !91 8406 8407 b41 415- _B41J 89W q 858 -- 8lHa 400 _ d100 _ a. a 3n9 tl4w 9s7H b)W 8394 b9C] tly n4C9_ _84(w 59 ,q ± 97 __ - 8!W 395 _ B7B0 B)91 U1 8358 IaMJ tl`� 51 __jig 9780 dSls 83In n!b> 9370 8307 8350 x3v1- 'I-- - SLS 8312 85L4 315 8360 8380 b5d� 8787 _8i91 - .. sl d' 3381 la _ !>! 0368 B550 ! .. . d3b0 838] b372 tll❑ 876tl b!V m IJ d''4'a W BJ70 8i71 �� - !45 8364 tlS45 : b)9( tl 4 tl5401 8571 0,G 9>LI • 8746 8365• 8554 — - "II 8759 -- -- a35. -83J0 8!fi 1,141144 B35I� I8!•st, !!5 tl34U tllJl tl!A a12n _ 8J20 Y -- 8397 593I b54! w !J> BSIL _ 9J d16 BSIB blSo ° d3�. BL5fw 1- B]SC- _- __ 8315 -_ 8 `9( 35, 4 335d 8132 W Se: dIL,O tl5W n!I p uYs _ BJIO Q 8 36 - ". 6550 535 D325 L ,�333/�B290 J 8510 kd3Zh Bm5_ b /r�Je[ �/p plJ�l, I_8510 B316 YJIIe�`i"l n27S a,?0271 8Z7/3S8505 tl312 U297- 9GOY�'I00 : b2b7 0260 0 d 12618300 L,u.___ tl2B90'.Pork• •8 7 8251 B25U_ d2M 2B5 d27 ---lJ �. i . • _ _9281 v" `� ` w r o { 8261 .68NJ1 rn 0270r 8275 827 -0 G 1'/ 1 s ^ r r BY55 AIL V i -- a265 d1Y1fJ-- 0270 N b765_ YC 'tl82~4 A9lwasfiJ. tlN2..2 .Im�Iawm• T.- LINaua w RpIN Z 81W s 82 P5BAtl7d5_�Fy nry WIi . In10 7 ^145 --._ -- BaItl1BZS3 8120a8245 !Sig ' 81l 6213 Tit. 217—BS BIRO210 8101 VOIY B160 7d7B 8117 82 8101 -8:0"�r.RT 3'0Z, _m ails 86' p`23 0175 0 815UBi9135 In 0161 tlBNO 8165 8142 In8154 A 81Y 14m9101 121 Owl _nln:L-1-b I1 Jl - . --_. UJlrl� .�, ry :ul3f ' ; .p I.� tlWl han"s b01> I ,ap LL _ o,1I �� \ rr L; ry "„V lu{,_ '1. wh 8011 r d: n0/I 90- \ i� r, BfA.0 ; tlua5 bJIS M ! 1... _ ...M 1 tl9.9 ne_4 _. 9 ?; BCAu &14M-• .___ .. tllp, b,NS - dR/. ✓T . WINS M1r41 I g Byh,Il1 y016^ tl)25 bUJ9 w12 - bu•3 _ 8fab , \ l • r• b025 tlV70 a• 25 b I/b '� •� y'M BU21J' U015 110(5 n'�IL' Dull dlMlfl. `JJ J i 80 huu ^BUI6 a U01Y5 MEAL J _-I -__ U &J /vn5 tlth J 7Yb1 15Y'� 'IJ J 'Nb5> 1b9UJ _ 1 7Y6I.J.VH ; •1_ IYnl1; li �-• %9!y I•Ju)� TJIS I u - —_-- %'1/u/Y64 , '14y 7'J54. /Y5'1 MM L 4 iikl IYu 11111 VI(W _ I IILAL _ TJII 1YItl a' % 'a O 114 PI[ ROAp n ry / T /bb14 /tlYl J' .. ItltlO /n NTb(ll—, {S /b9v ('rii I� ! / •�i, l I I I N �I%;— N-,I _�_�M'lr�;./adz -- cif5 of voudg lei OAMSEV COUNTY. MIN NESO November 7, 1986 Mr. Arthur Zielinski 8344 Groveland Mounds View, MN 55432 RE: Street light in your neighborhood. TA I<511116MWAY 10 M OUNOS VIEW, MINN, 55117 iB4]055 Dear Mr, Zielinski: Thank you for meeting with Don Zettel of NSP and myself on Monday, November 3, 1986. Attached please find Mounds View City Council policy regarding street light installation. t As we discussed at our meeting, I understand twithin YOU will be securing signatures from property owners ✓ 200 feet of proposed street light. I enjoyed having a chance to meet'you and hope to talk to you soon. If you have any ,ostions, please fe6l free to call. Sincerely, CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW ,"A /%� �� Steven W. '1'i atcher Director of Public Works/Community Development SWT/cr enclosure cc: Clerk -Administrator Pauley Councilmember Gary Quick rlxhvl.nrloN uP IIL^.iul.11'r1O0 1111, 1010 Ann ;•:, i 1 EN01.11'i•IUII NU. I.!" 1 .I i ( ' CITY OP•140111IO; VILLA ; ' COUNTY f• IIAnaI:Y /•: STATE UI'IRIENOTA A STIIL1rrld LO'y IIISTALLATION pol.ICY In11'LACI1IG .}. ItL'SUI,11'1'ION 110. 946 KIII:III;AS, cm:b year nbu City Gnwrll .sect vas several reyuos is fur the Lestallatlul of Ntfeetlightnt •eel i .'1 WHERVAS, Link cool of operating s(reoLlighta Is a large budget I .•f•I.,,j . {Cen17 and r •', f' HIIRIIf:Alltill- oo Cily L'ounc{1 ""site' "' ucliula lu and enhance Lho thk! slaw of strcetl lghts r11. � ;•f;` ' snf sty of Its uC ighLu.hnndy Lhrough "rout Lax burden of operating street- ulti Is at the sa1111 tile- keeping like i''q.ly ); lights at a minbmmr. • now, Tni:1e:roIII:, Ike IT I11:501.Vl<1) by 1Iu1 Cnu"tell of like City of the iestallo Llon •. Mounds View that the tollowing policy shall goyefil of streCLllghts at a miu{uemt flow, T111:111'1U1:N, in: IT Ill:WIN1:11 by It... Council of the City df the leatnllatlou ! nnumis View that Iha following I,olicy ❑h.rdl govern of streetligh Lu In rusilleiltial areas: •. 111 Properly owners danlrlug (uutallatlou of st.reatllghts with "A I• shall uuhnlit a petition regtlnstiwg such lcel:t fifty p(Jrcwlt Of the affected rll, sigualuras of at All signs Lures of persons on the property owners. (. path lull slulll 1n2nll Choir co!mnnl to tile location of r l'. ,• tho light, nn or near thuir properly. The letl tlon rha I I inr. ode stuns W rP oC col ent of the krn ter hV Lhe final location unless 1I(�1 r!11 -� It Is determined by the Cit Cay 1111C `ka la rut l_Jleetad�. the ileal tit tr i t 1 n are -at a Presuryill" A owner ;•' 1 ; •�..' and saf • c. Idelts a Lite area. property be 111" .nmd to ba a [ec cal k a/bur ".-party In ::hell withil, 2110 set in ally atroet )free 0 from the pro- of thu street. •, i •,P''1 r; 'i posed sU,etlight location on enter sidu directly affected shall be one whose A property owner property the light is on, abuLts, or is directly •' ��.�' :uljdq:enl. Iopposi Ls aide o[ strrull• (1) The InnI:Ue Cd location shall I4CL•L at lest oneofil taut de , , •,• ,'� 1 ariteri:l, Intersections, p follnw{ma leng blocks, vaedal lred areas, or mod- 1' 1: <.,:.. seen, dead e1n1!:, blocl: pcdcolrion cru!:nwalks. A showillg of 110011 for a must be •. 7,. !ilmilal criteria may also kjealify. The criteria related to a need LUC public sillat.y. i l lh (1) All slrne Lligh Lo slmll be spaced at leaat�00 foeo apart no shall lights IC!a '.l: �,• win, too above criteria apply. IA case ,��J1 be closer than 250[eut to one another. bc/�00 Walt high •. 14) All new strneLlight Installa Lions _shall at a L0 [out moue Ling., height. 1'i: ."i• 1' nessurg ugvlium nil Slreellightlt shall be Iuclndrnl In all public improvement ..1 Projects according to the above cri lo[ia. ,•i;_ (6) Ounlifying r(,goeata for slrnetlights may be scheduled It the City Council for inelnllnlioll in a subsequent year determines sufficient funds are not avallable is the cur- j .1 runt City budget, MOP tod Ibe llth day of Pcbruary, 1900 inesole"On Ito. 1069) �•1 and the 111h day of !Icptembar, 1981 (IICNelkl Lion No. 13541, t' 11 � i r n PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA ? Special Council Meeting November 5, 1986 B Ei a Mounds View City Hall 2401 Highway 10, Mounds View, MN 55112 ------------------------------------------------------------ Acting Mayor Blanchard called the meeting 1. Call to Order to order at 5:03 p.m. MEMBERS PRESENT: Acting Mayor Blanchard, 2. Roll Call Councilmembers Hankner and Quick. ALSO PRESENT: Clerk -Administrator Pauley, Finance Director Brager and Public Works/ Community Development Director Thatcher. Motion/Second: Hankner/Quick adoption of 3. Adoption of Resolution No. 2122 and waived the Resolution reading. No. 2122 4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Acting Aayor Blanchard adjourned the mmeting at 5:07 p.m. ully subm4tted, Do 1 F. aul Cle Adm nist