HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packets - 1988/10/03CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
CITY COUNCIL
ACE'1DA SESSION
OCTOBER 3, 1988
7:00 P.M.
1. Presentation By and Discussion with Mary Hauser,
Metropolitan Council Representative
2. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding Conditional
Use Permit Request for Steve Leguil, 8024 Woodlawn
Drive, Planning Case No. 234-88
3. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding Conditional
Use Permit Request for Richard Hanson, 8075 Sunnyside
Road, Planning Case No. 249-88
4. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding Sign Permit
for Multi -Tech Building, 2205 Woodale Drive
5. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding League of
Minnesota Cities Coordinating Committee Property Tax
Computer Analysis
6. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding Property
Acquisition Negotiations for 8100 Groveland Road
7. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding Celebrate
Minnesota
8. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding Funding
Search for Silver View Par): Pond Management Proposal
9. Continued Discussion of 1989 General Fund Budget
"*10. Continued Discussion of 1989 Water and Seger Budget
11. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding Public Worlcs
Loader and Snow Equipment Bids
12. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding Public Works
Dump Truck and Snow Equipment Bids
To be hand carried Monday evening
tt!! P ., , A, •C
PROCEEDINGS OF THE CI_Y COUNCIL �'
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA °°��••(((JJJ
Regular Meeting
September 26, 1988
Mounds View City Hall
2401 Hwy. 10, Mounds View, MN 55112
---------------------------------------------------------
The Mounds View City Council was called to order by 1. Call to Order
Mayor Links at 7:00 PM on Monday, September 26, 1988.
The Pledge of Allegiance was said. 2. Pledge of
Allegiance
MEMBERS PRESENT: Councilmemners Hanknec, Wuori, 3. Roll Cail
Quick, zlanchard and Mayor Linke. -
ALSO PRESENT: City Attorney Karney, Clerk/AOmini-
strator Pauley and City Planaer Herman.
4. Approval of
Motion!Second: Quick/Hankner to approve the Minutes:
September 12, 1988 minutes as presented. September 12,
5 ayes 0 nays 1988
Motion Carried
There were no residents requests or comments from 5' Residenandts Re-
quets
the floor. Comments from
the Floor
Clerk/Administrator Pauley read the items on the
6, ApprovConsenalof
lgenda
proposed consent agenda.
Motion/Second: Wuori/Hankner to approve the consent
agenda as presented, and waive the reading of the
resolutions.
Motion Carried
i 5 ayes 0 nays
I
I
Mayor Links closed the regulc.r meeting and opened
Public 9
7' Certification
he public hearing at 7 05 PM.
of Delinquent,.-
v _....
Finance Director Brager explained the utility bills
Y
I
being proposed are all six months or more delinquent,
7
and have received seven notices requesting payment,
the
but have not responded. He explained proposed
resolution would alloir-the City to direct Ramsey.
County to certify these bills with the property taxes
on the properties, to be payable and collected in
r ,
Mounds View City Council O",� e•tember 26 1988
Regular Meeting UN -off P F1 b � Dage Two
1989. The total amount involved is $2,023.45.
Mayor Linke closed the public hearing and reopened
the regular Meeting at 7:06 PM.
Motion/Second: Quick/Blanchard to approve Resolution 8. Consideration
No. 2390, levying a tax for delinquent utility of Resolution
charges over a one year period, and waive the No. 2390
reading.
5 ayes 0 nays
Motion Carried
Park Director Saarion reviewed the bids received for 9.
Awatd Bids for
the proposed redevelopment of Hillview Park. She
Redevelopment
also requested Council approve an additional $2,000
for 9illview
for the grading of Hillview Park, and she reviewed
Park
funding sources for the project.
Motion/Second: Quick/Hankner to award the bids for
the redevelopment of Hillview Park to Gopher Electric
Contractors, Inc. in the amount of $15,094.00 for
electrical and lighting, Neeck Construction, Inc. in
the amount of $4,450.00 for masonary work for the park
building, and to Bahl Movers, Inc. in the amount of
$1,350.00 for relocating the park building. An
additional $2,000.00 is also approved for the grading
of Hillview Park.
5 ayes 0 nays
Notion Carried
Clerk/Administrator Pauley read proposed Resolution 10.
Consideration
No. 2367.
of Eesolution
Motion/Second: Hankner/Blanchard to approve Reeolu-
—NNo2
No. 2387
[ion 87, adjusting polio_ sargeants salaries
retroactive to January 1, 1988.
5 ayea 0 nays
Motion Carried
Clerk/Administrator Pauley explained the intent of 11.
Consideration
proposed Resolution No. 2383, which would provide
of Resolution
support to the North Suburban Cable Commission, in
No. 2383
community access management by a non-profit corpora-
tion.
it
5 ayes 0
1 1•!
Resoli
NO1VC I.ne reauing.
nays
Motion Carried
Mounds View City Council September 26, 1988
Regular Meeting �p y �'••.,, !! Pa a Three
---------------------- [It
--------`--------------------9-------••-------
Clerk/Administrator Pauley read proposed Resolution 12. Consideration
No. 2388. of Resolution
No. 2388
Motion/Second: Quick/Blanchard to approve Resolution
No. 2388, approving payment of $451,201 to Everest
Development Ltd. for land buy -down of Lot 1, Block 1
of the Mounds View Business Park.
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported he and the City 13. Consideration
Managers of Blaine and Spring Lake Park had been in of Proposed
negotiations witn the Fire Chief for the past three 1989 Fire
months, and he feels the prono=a1 hefore the Council Department
is acceptable. He explained Chief Fagerstrom had Budget
proposed an annuity program for new firefighters, due
to problems experienced in recruiting and retaining
them, but it was agreed the issue would be discussed
h':tween now and the 1990 budget for ?ossible imple-
mentation later.
Motion/Second: Hankner/Quick to approve the 1989
Fire Department Budget as submitted by Fire Chie'
Fagerstrom in his memorandum dated September 16,
1988.
f5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Clerk/Administrator Pauley explained the public 14. First Reading of
hearing for this ordinance had been held September Ordinance No.
12. 449
Motion/Second: Blanchard/Wunri to approve the first
reading of Ordinance No. 449, adopting the 1988 Long
Term Financial Plan, and waive the reading.
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
City Planner Herman reviewed the proposed ordinance, 15. Second Reading
which will allow for pet stores in the City's code. and Adoption
of Ordinance
Motion/Second: Wuori/Quick to approve the second No. 448
reading and adoption of Ordinance No. 448, amending
the Municipal Code of Mounds View by amending Chapter
40 entitled "Zoning", and waive the reading.
Councilmember_Hankner - -aye
r --
Councilmemberi- aye-
Councilmember Quick- - aye
Councilmember Blanchard - aye
Mayor Linke - aye Motion Carried
�; ;% nDn,, �.y�E
DSeptember
aer 26, 1988
Mounds View City Council - s p V -------
Regular Meeting 'U,ji((_I _A_9_�i- --------------------
Resolution 16. Consideratigpq
Motion/Second: Quick/Blanchard to approveAmoco of Resolutid
approving the development request by No 2374
Oil Company, 2155 Highway Avenue, Planning Case No.
241-68, and waive the readng. Motion Carried
5 ayes 0 nays
omments
Councilmember Hankner
stated
0il Company doingcbusiness
Amoco
to make concerning could end up in
in Mounds View. She stated they
litigation again, and she is notparticularly in a
of the way they have of working w
ith the less than cooperative way, and their total disregard
for the environment.
Magor Linke added their thoughts and needs are
strictly for themselves and not the community. Be
pointed out there is arcar wastokenslfo lockirway,
and Amoco could have p'
the
customers to go there to wash their cars, rather
than building their own facility.
Councilmember Wuori explained
that as made up a matter of
conscience she had previously
hmind
that she would not offer a motion, or second one,
to approve Amoco Oil. Sne stated she did not CommissionLe
for the way they treated the Planning
as she was present at those meetings and felt the
Planning Commissioners were treated shabbily by
Amoco Oil -
Mayor
becauserheehadded to,handoted thereowashnoresolution only
recourse
available.
17. Report of
Attorney Barney had no report. Attorney
Hankner reported the Blaine League 18.
Reports of
Councilmembers:
Councilmember
would be holding a wetlands meeting
it.
Councilmember
of Women Voters
October 4, and people should be made aware of
a wetlands
Hankner
on
She also requested Staff get a copy of
Channel 2 the previous evening, as
program aired on
it but was told it was very good.
she had missed
Clerk/Administrator Pauley replied he would check
if it was going to be
with them, and would also ask
rebroadcast. -
_ —
Councilmember Hankner stated a number of people have
maintenance, with
made positive comments on street
ttpoints, Some
one concern expresheenoughtocause waterdrainageer-
is getting 9
y la
into yards and driveways.
r ! � F,. September 26, 198C
~' Mounds View City Council 6 pg^�a-------.
Regular Meeting uNA B_ 4 J- L - Page --Five
^ clerk/Administrator Pauley replied Staff was aware
of that and would look into it.
Councilmember Quick suggested highlighting the street
maiogram in the nextntenance
questionsnonswhyterthingse
statedhehaswere
done as they were.
the fence �%
Councilmember owns acrosskner dfrom Edgewood is in
walkway the Cityty
horrible shape and is an eye sore, and requested it
be fixed up, as it is City property.
Councilmember Hankner brought up the issue of garage
sale signs. They have been discussed jr. the past and
while it was agreed it is difficult co enforce, some
Cities do prohibit their placement on utility poles.
Attorney Karney advised that unless someoneis
next
act'lally observed to be putting a sign up,
to impossible to prove they did it, or to get a
conviction.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley directed City Planner
Herman to research the issue, in conjunction will be
with
the sign code update the Planning
Commissr-, doing.
Councilmember Wuori had no report.
Councilmember Quick had no report.
Councilmember Blanchard had no report.
Mayor Lithatathegrdrequestphadebtenlactedfonmearlier
CompanyWhile
in the meeting end he advised that
several several comments were made bye
suggested Amoco make arrangements to view the video
tape of the meeting.
Ciark/Administrator Pauley reported the Library
19
Board has requested a meeting withof the council
concerning the on -going it
issuei ing the
Long Lake Road site for the Mounds View library.
He reviewed ytheates Councilered by to .meetthe withoard and the
the them at
was agreed ib
Roseville Libcaiy at 7 PM on Monday OthebCouncil
i Since that is a r-gular agenda nigh
will call to order at 6 PM, adjourn to go to Roseville
and meet with the Board, and then reconomeletene t City
Hall if there is further business to p
Councilmember
Wuori
Councilmember
Quick
Councilmember
Blanchard
Mayor Links
Report of
Clerk/
Administrator
d ..
Mounds View City Council
Regular Meeting---------
le
MotinLagendalsession to beginuat 6hPM-
Oct0ber 17,1988
5 ayes 0 nays
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported Jim Tobias has
requested a certificate of occupancy be issued to
Amoco Oil Company, at 2800 Highway 10, aq all work
has been completed satisfactorily.
certificate
Motion/�a'ck/Linketoiueperategasp"mPs
cupY Permitto
of oc
at 2800 Highway 10.
for Amoco Oil Company
September 26, 1918
Page Six --_- --
5 ayes 0 nays
Councilmember Hankner brought up a recent artShee
in "Cable Talk", conv
cering pay for iewing.
stated X rated movies can be ordered by phone, and
may
not watch in their own homes, she is concern -
while she does not want to dictate what people honer
and may able to order movies by P
ed witt, mbeaFFroval. She added a firm stata-
without parental
ment should be made.
rated films can also be ordered
Mayor Linke noted X
by acccident, as he learned by hitting the wrong
number once. er in for
Attorney Karney advised the consum lellegal impli-
the aervice, and there is very
cation. He also pointed out it can be controlled
by computer, and the subscriier car. inform the company
that ^andtthefilms
computer willtblock o be aall Llowefforts ed into their
home, would not advisc
order or send it there. He added he
the Council ttheaI Ft stand on the issue, although
individually Y
Mayor Linke adjourned the meeting at 7:44 PM'
20
Respectfully submitted,
Donald F. Pauley
Clerk/Administrator
r
Motion Carried,
Motion Carried
Adjournment
MEMO TO: Clerk -Administrator and City Council
FROM: City Planner Herr.an
DATE: September 26, 1988
SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUEST FOR STEVE LEGUIL,
8024 WOODLAWN DRIVE, PLANNING CASE NO. 234-88
In February of this year, Mr. Leguil had applied for a variance
to build a garage of over 1,000 square feet. At that time, the
limit on garage size was 864 square feet. After much discussion
the Planning Commission decided to amend the Zoning Ordinance to
allow for garages larger than 864 square feet with a conditional
use permit..
The ordinance enabling larger garages has since been approved by
the Council, published, and is now in effect. Mr. Leguil has
revised his request since initial application for a garage of 996
square feet (24' x 41.5'). This will allow him to build an
accessory storage structure in the future should he choose to do
SO.
Mr. Leguil will be removing his existing garage and building the
proposed one. The garage conforms to code requirements for
setbacks. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the
conditional use permit in Resolution No. 258-88.
KH/BAC
y
RESOLUTION NO. 2391
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUEST
REQUEST BY SIEVE LEGUIL TO CONSTRUCT AN OVERSIZED
GARAGE AT 8024 WOODLAWN DRIVE, PLANNING CASE NO. 234-88
WHEREAS, Mr. Steve Leguil, 6024 Woodlawn Drive, has
requested a conditional use permit to allow for the construction
of an oversized garage (996 square feet); and
WHEREAS, Mounds View Municipal Code, Chapter 40.10,
Subdivision C(D) provides that the maximum size of a garage in an
R-1 District shall be 864 square feet unless a conditional use
permit is awarded by the City; and
WHEREAS, Mounds View Municipal Code, Chapter 40.10,
Subdivision D(6) A through F, provides a garage may be up to
1,264 square feet when said building is designed and maintained
to provide a uniform appearance with the principle dwelling unit,
and if the garage is over 1,000 square feet no other accessory
`r building will be allowed on the lot; and
WHEREAS, the Mounds View Planning Commission has reviewed
the applicant's request for a conditional use permit and
determines that it is in conformance with the aforementioned
conditions.
NOW, THEREFORE, 9E IT RESOLVED that the City Covincil of
the City of Mounds View approves a conditional use permit to
allow for an oversized garage of 996 square feet requested by
Steve Leguil, 8024 Woodlawn Drive, legally known as Woodlawn
Terrace, Lot 17, contingent upon the following conditions:
The accessory building must conform with Sections
40.04, Svbd. F and 10.10, Subd. C(1) of the Zoning
Code.
The combined square footage of all accessory buildings
on one lot cannot exceed one thousand two hundred
sixty-four (1,264) square feet.
If the garage square footage .is greater than one
thousand (1,000) square feet, no other accessory
building is allowed.
11
RESOLUTION NO. 2391
PAGE TWO
4. The building shall be designed and maintained to
provided a uniform appearance with the dwelling unit.
5. The width of the building cannot exceed thirty-five
(35) feet nor allow for more than a three (3) vehicle
access.
6. Should the use for which ti:e permit was granted be
changed, the permit shall be subject to reconsider-
ation, revocation or other action regulated by Chapter
40.25 of the Zoning Code.
7. The conditional use permit sh.ii be riled with Ramsey
County for recording on the title of subject property.
Adopted this loth day of October, 1988.
ATTEST:
Mayor
(SEAL)
Clerk -Administrator
CIRf.�-ES—'iKE�S
DASHED-.I.I��E -FENCE
jp,�yg6hR StIPI�ES—HE�+GS
-D.
Ga12PUE:
3-0T1-orp SouIJpr:m1�5
O o0 0o I ° �
IQ p o 1 0
0o O O 1 ,
ti3
0, O 0 0
p
p 4_J
I � _
1° o o ° NouS�
0 o e o o Aso'
0
1° O
L
o1- D t L9
✓ SO `
p
DWLf-wKy
� JE LEG
J
i�o SGPLi; St�24 WOOD"
IgogupSlEuI,
k '
to
9t� 3
MEMO TO: Clerk -Administrator and City Council
FROM: City Planner Herman
DATE: September 26, 1988
FOR RICH
RD
SUBJECT: CONDTIONAL 80751SUNNYSiDEEROAD, SIPLANNING TCASE No. 249-88SON,
Mr. Hanson has applied for a conditional use permit to allow for
additional garage space for huarrefeettional (22' xv24'). heMP=_Hanson
currently has a garage 528 sq The resolution
to add approximately 465 square feet
to11,0003square feet because
is written to allow for a garage up
Mr. Hanson may add some additional inches to his dimensional 000
The code specifies that if the applicant has a garage over ,
square feet he cannot have any other accessory structure. At
present, the Hanson's have a storage ecausetructure f 9Plannisquare feet
that they would like to keep.
recommended imposing c
Commission has sguare toot limit -
Planning commission ResolutionNo.. 234-88 recommends approval.
The proposal conforms to the required setbacks.
KH/BAC
RESOLUTION NO. 2392
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION APPROVIt4G OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
REQUEST BY RICHARD HANSON TO CONSTRUCT AN OVERSIZED
GARAGE AT 8075 SUNNYSIDE ROAD, PLANNING CASE NO. 249-88
WHEREAS, Mr. Richard Hanson, 8011 Sunnyside Road, has
requested a conditional permit
allowuareffor the construction
of an oversized garage (up t
WHEREAS, Mounds View Municipal Code, Chapter 40.10;
Subdivision C(D) provides that the maximum size of a garage in an
R-1 District shall be 364 square feet unless a conditional use
permit is awarded by the City; and
WHEREAS, Mounds View Municipal Code, Chapter 40.10,
Subdivision D(6) A through F, provides a garage may be up to
1,264 sgv:t:e feet when said building is designed and maintained
to provide a uniform appearance with the priet nciple dwelling unit,
ry
and if the garage is over 1,000 square
building will be allowed on the lot; and
WHEREAS, the Mounds View ?lanning Commission has reviewed
the applicant's request for a conditional use permit and
determines that it is in conformance with the aforementioned
conditions.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESuLVED that the City Counc:i of
the City of Mounds View approves
e£ a conditional
use permit to
allow for an oversized garage
feet
requested by Richard Hanson, 8075 Sunnyside Road, legally known
as Spring Lake Park Hillview, Lot 95, contingent upon the
following conditions:
orm
ttons
1 40e04, Subd. Fband d40-10ing ,,sSubd.1fC(1)wofhc the Zoning
Code.
f all
essory
2 cobinedge dings
two hundred
sixty-four (1,264) square feet.
3. The Codes states that if a garage square footage is
greater than one thousand (1,000) square feet, no
other accessory building is allowed. Therefore, the
site cannot hold any new storage structures as the
applicant currently has an accessory building of 96
square feet.
RESOLUTION NO. 2392
PAGE TWO
ATTEST:
(SEAL)
4. The building shall be designed and maintained to
provided a uniform appearance with the dwelling unit.
5. The width of the building cannot exceed thirty-five
(35) feat nor allow for more than a three (3) vehicle
access.
6. Should the use for which the permit was granted be
changed, the permit shall he subject to reconsider-
ation, revocation or other action regulated by Chapter
40.25 of the Zoning Code.
7. The conditional use permit shall be filed with Ramsey
County for recording on the title of subject property.
Adopted this loth day of October, 1988.
fayor
Clerk -Administrator.
�..
FbA'
\1
to
MEMO TO: Clerk -Administrator and City Council
FROM: City Planner Herman
DATE: September 26, 1988
SUBJECT: SIGN PERMIT FOR MULTI -TECH BUILDING,
2205 WOODALE DRIVE
Mr. Tim Nelson, on behalf of Multi -Tech, has submitted
preliminary signs plans for the building. In reviewing the
proposal, I do not believe the second ground sign conforms to the
Code. The first (larger sign) .located along Highway 10, while
not a pedestal sign, is well within the size and setback
requirements for B-3, B-4 and I-1 districts. I believe it is an
oversight in the Code which states pedestal signs rather than
ground siqns [39.15 (11)].
The proposal illustrates a second sign located on the corner of
Woodale and Quincy. It is the size of this sign which I believe
does not conform to the Code. In 39.01 (6), Pedestal Signs, it
states:
No business property shall have more than one pedestal sign
adjacent to each street upon which such business property
abuts; provided that on each street_ frontage or more than 100
feet one additional pedestal sign may be established and
maintained on such street frontage if such additional pedestal
sign (a) is located on a single pole, (b) does not exceed 28
square feet in an area on any side and does not have more than
two sides, (c) is not more than 4 feet in width or 7 feet in
height on the sign face, (d) is located at least 7 feet above
the surface of the street.
While this applies to pedestal signs only, the Code :foes not
regulate ground signs and only mentions them in the definition
section. Aside from the height of the sign or that it is cn
posts or shafts, a ground sign and pedestal sign are quite
similar. In fact, it is questionable that a pedestal sign,
allowed in 39.15(11), is more desirable than a ground sign.
Ignoring for a moment this ambiguity, the second proposed sign is
72 square feet rather than the allowed 28 square feet. This in
my opinion is the issue, not the height of the sign. Because
this second sign is substantially over the Code requirements for
height and size, I request direction from the City Council. I
Clerk -Administrator and City Council
September 26, 1988
Page 2
believe the building site is quite large and could accommodate
the larger sign. Additionally, the proposal quality and
character of the sign would make it an attractive addition to the
Business Park.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of all sign
permits for t e Mu ti-Tech building based on the merits of the
proposal and the ambiguity of the Code.
KH/BAC
j
y t3r3 j
SEP 10
EVEREST DEVELOPMENT LTD
RECEIVED
ANINUR(N 711MEKW(M)I'1•IIU c'•+ CITY OF
p'r MODpDS VIEW
September 28, 1988
Ms. rim Herman
City Planner
City of Mounds View
2401. U.S. Highway 10
Mounds View, MN 55112
RE: Multi -Tech Systems, Inc.
Signage Proposal
Dear Kim:
Enclosed for review and Council consideration, are the
signage criteria and plans prepared for Multi -Tech Systems,
Inc L Cragg signs, !no., togeiher with a sketch ^hnwina
the locations of the two proposed ground signs.
We understand the Multi -Tech request for a second ground
sign will be scheduled for consideration by the City Council
at their meetings on October 3 and October 10. I will plan
to attend those meetings to present the sign plan and answer
any questions the Council may have.
Sincerely,
EVEREST DEVELOPt47HT, LTD.
4T othy J. Nelson
TJN/jgy
Enc.
$Hi Umq Ldv Rudd
P .. Hm I!!9! • Ru4villt•. \I\ 55111
iLL'i L 16.i i1N1
6'�_ 12'•0
161 I 12r i
ILwIVIIIvr11tU OR
• COPY/GRAPHICS-JIGGED OUT
AND BACKED WITH ACRYLIC / LOGO=
TRANSLUCENT VINYL APPLIED
•BASE=ALUM. SHROUD
OR
BRICK BASE BY OTHERS
• POWERED BY 1 1OV, BY OTHERS
4LO
�+:�r�iih•,-:h/ t�., t.r�.r..0 it: �y.b.•.y '4'.1ii�
�' V .wenen Are.`, (.yyen Vaw�, MN 'ub1:/ • I"1 el D WUWJ
• S/F GROUND
• COPY /GRAPHICS=
"MULTI TECH- CHANNEL LTRS
"SYSTEM"- ALUM. PLATE LTRS
`LOGO%JIGGED AND BACKED.
INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED
•BASE =ALUM. SHROUD
OR
BRICK BASE BY OTHERS
• POWERED BY 110V. BY OTHERS
--I' —
sse Multi Tech Systems
Y� uit sech �,
Mounds View Systems
lil..
F 1(.V1 6F
I 191 I 24" I
9"
< Fs
��- �rSj,, �e .'i _� '➢. t It 'r P.r ITl �A�
4'-3.�. � r •� E��
r itT cn.,,.
E 3 y � `ir ri,R2 \rtX 's tiJ.y vi t < d, i t�4•� .:S°t
3 � " � c-✓3 �, >,:.�. mac,-.ncr -
2Y
/ l
• S/F INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED
7. • COPY / GRAPHICS -JIGGED OUT
AND BACKED WITH ACRYLIC / LOGO=
TRANSLUCENT VINYL A°PLIED
• BASE = ALUM. SHROUD
OR
BRICK BASE BY OTHERS
• POWERED BY 110V. BY OTHERS
MaoO-AA y ❑adwA VA':uy, MN ^if 2l • {Gf:15UiNuul
OR • S/F GROUND
• COPY / GRAPHICS=
"MULTI TECH- CHANNF..L LTRS
"SYSTEM"- ALUM. PLATE LTRS
"LOGO"- JIGGED AND BACKED
INTERNALLY ILLUTAINATED
• BASE = ALUM. SHROUD -OR
• BRICK BASE BY OTHERS
• POWERED BY 1 10V. BY OTHERS
lsse--1 MUI;i Tech Systems
=lTeMounds View J
.1tN ' C'. U:'R - Pi' O' R 'A •'T-£i •D
TO Everest Group JobNahld=twi_'"
MultTec'h Systeas
2685 Long Lake Road Moundsvi.ew Business PK
Roseville, MN 55113 .bbNumber JobPhl
Attn: Rick Anderson
We hereby submit specifications and estimates for.
>� To manufacture and install two single faced routed alumint�t cabinets.
acrylic with thickl,ess Selected by owner.
The copy will be push through
The cabinet will be fabricated of aluminum with 45 degrees ends and
cap, The sign will be illuminated with A.O. flcrscent lamps' Cagy
will be selected by owner and the cabinet finish will be brushed aluminum,
The brick base will be provied by others.
*One cabinet will measure 5'-311x 18' x 24" deep
*One cabinet will measure 3'-8"x 131x 18" deep
�1
S ® CIT'! PERMITS, ELECTRICAL SERVICE AND FINAL ELECTRICAL
CONNECTION ARE NOT INCLUDED IN OUR ?RICE.
1
W3 (�° M;= hereby to furnish material and labor - completa in accordance rah the above
dolbre (S tans. for the sum ;
Payment to be made as follows:
50% DOWN AND BALANCE DUE UPON COMPLETION.
A7 materiel Is euann:sed» be u sp,drwd. MI walk n h, d.liud l,d In ■ wnFinaNM,
-=V,&!,Eo�n, I�nroldMwd dP1 wlW,iu+tMdody vs upon wdnm oidws and A beW" sn Sgnab,re
pciftuaaderGeovsr,n Abovocwtni Oq w10».Ml ,grad and otw _S.8 Y Insunno,;,�, �, :.TM j mr�T:, BERARD..
a dal,ys 9sy'ad our can:at. gvnar ro �' aaton 4wnrw.' .. .. •. • .. _ ..
OY workan N n,Ey mvvsd by WorWnmY ComDen wIddmm by u, N m axep»d w�ufvl
_Z_3 ¢A p*pZWj The above prkes, specTwl'ons
Sgnature
and conditions are satisfactory and are hereby accepted. You are author' ad to do the work as specified. Payment will be made as outlined above. Signature /
Date of Acceptance:
CraggSf . n's
d N-C=O•:R P-O<R A--.T-.E D
TO Everest Group
2685 Long lake Road
Roseville, MN 55113
We hereby suhmit specifications and estimates for.
Phone
Same
To manufacture and install two double post and panel
directional sign with double faces. The signs will measure
21x 31 faces and t to pests will read 2"x 2" x 101 ieng,
The copy will be vinyl and reading "Deliveries" and "Vistors".
with t}e muititec logo. Colors will be selected by owner.
CITY PERMITS,ELECTRICAr. SERVICE AND FINAL ELECTRICAL
CON.'ECTION ARE NOT INCLUDED 1N OUR PRICE.
°d68 (mu6 pleJ9 hereby to furnish material and labur • complete in accordance wCh the above specdi,;ations, for the) sum of:
dollors ($ ).
Payment to to made as folbws: —'
505 DOWN AND BALANCE DUE UPON COMPLETION.
A7 M"" Is tuanntmd b W u 9461 d. A)"A b be axplaiM in a wv,:unan�,ya
Mannar a¢d.Sng to 35 dardpxkas, Any allwadona a da•ladoln ban M..w
apadtcadms Inrddng rite costa Wit be MW1*d rty upon wnnm adwa, and wid bony yi
a.tra duvot aver and abora dw esdmate. At agra enb mndugmtupar atrXu, aoddmu
.. OW*04"7a^d ohraorxur, OWnar berry tn, bmado arc otr nawstay koun .._
Cur waken an1Y !"ad by Workmews Ca;Waado,.
W.thdrtxnj
�FZ0P=4 Ihdabavoprices,specificaton3
dnd conditions are satlsfuetory and are here,./ acceplaL. You arc authorized
to do the work as spetilied. Pay oant will be made as outlined above,
f Date of Acceptance:
Authorized
Stgnabno —PAT BgRARD
1h9 P�ro,al mry ba "—'`'--
Signature
Signature -
®I®
MEMO TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
® FROM: CLERK-ADMINISTRATO
DATE: SEPTEMBER 28, 198
SUBJECT: LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES COORDINATING
COMMITTEE PROPERTY TAX COMPUTER ANALYSIS
Attached please find a memorandum from•the Presidents of the
Association of Metropolitan Municipalities, and Municinal
Legislative Commission, requesting financial participation
from the City of Mounds View is the preparation of a
property tax computer analysis for 1989 by the League of
Minnesota Cities Coordinating Committee. This Committee is
coordinating the efforts of the AMM and MLC as well as the
League of Cities in preparing for the next legislative
session and development of a property tax reform proposal
for that session with the key element being the retention of
the homestead credit.
An integral part of preparing a legislative proposal for
consideration during the 1989 Session is the development of
a computer analysis of current law and impacts of various
options. The cost of developing the computer data and
proposal is estimated to be $185,000.
The larger cities in the suburban metropolitan area are
being asked to contribute $2,000 each to the project.
Cities the size of Mounds View are being requested to
contribute whatever we feel is appropriate. As no line item
is in the budget which could be used to fund such a contri-
bution, monies for this project, if the Council deems it
appropriate to make a contribution, would have to come from
the Contingency Fund.
Although I am not thrilled with the idea of having to spend
money that we do not have in the budget, I can agree with
the importance of having a computer analysis system
developed and operational during the legislative process
when a variety of options, issues and alternatives are being
discussed. Such a program would allow the League of Cities
and other organisations working with them to respond to any
new proposals quickly and accurately and avoid being placed
in the position of having to sit back and watch what happens
to the property tax bill such as happened thin 1 st
session. Your direction in this matter would be
appreciated.
DFP/MJS
association of
metropolitan
municipalities
P R O M P T A C T I O N R E Q U E S T E D
September 21, 1988
Dear City Administrator/Manager:
The Association of Metropolitan Municipalities and the Municipal
Legislative Commission have been working for sometime with the
League of Minnesota Cities Coordinating Committee discussing
property tax computer analysis for 1989. The LMC has committed to
developing computer analysis capability for the 1990 legislative
(F; session but a transition year is necessary to be able to react and
participate knowledgeably in the 1989 session. The Coordinating
Committee has been negotiating with the Coalition of Greater
Minnesota Cities for development of a property tax reform proposal
for 1989, a key element of which, will be retention of the
principles of a Homestead Credit. Additional background data on the
research elements at:d product are erclosed.
This effort will cost approximately $185,000 for computer data
update and proposal development. To raise this amount, Minneapolis,
St. Paul, the Coalition of Greater Minnesota Cities, the Small City
organization, and the Metro Area suburbs are being asked to make
contributions. The suburbs share of funding has been targeted for
between $35,000 and $50,000, which will be raised voluntarily, not
through any type of mandatory assessment by either the AMM or MLC.
Thus, a request for financial contribution is being made of all
suburban cities. The larger member suburban cities are being asked
to commit $2,000 each to this effort, Your city, taking into
consideration its nmailer population and budget limitations is being
asked to contribute what you feel is appropriate. This financial
pledge is contingent upon two factors:
1) AMM and MLC Boards approval to proceed with this project, and-
V 2) Sufficient funding from the suburbs to raise the required
amount of dollars.
It may be imperative for all cities, especially suburban cities to
183 university avenuo east, st. pdul, minnesota 5510t (612) 227.4008
1 8 legislative session. Based
pro osal forthe schoolyfunding bills, counties and
develop a common p P
de the 1987 and 1988 tax and to a significant effort for
1 rO to at the expense of cities. This
school districts are committingof he at the expotion se Homestead
additional funossibie because aid type Program. Since the suburbs
is primarily P vor of en Credit i, exchanged for aid,
Credit in 1990 in fa Homestead i
are at the greatest risk it effort be made to restore the
it is paramount that a stron6 �s one time
Homestead Credit.
rofessicnal staffs of CMM and�i�h
be on an equal footing The data base or information which should result rom
effort will help assure thatthe
P will the 1989 session' Wi.tnout
that represent the suburban a unified position
other city lobbyists in the state ourinE the suburban interest
of this suc°eSstie��peatectin6
the availabilityOf
cities,
supported by
is in doubt. this request with your council and reply
strongly consider verbally no later than Wednesday,
Please, ledge sheet or You
have any questions, call
using the enclosed P
October 5, 1988 to the AMM Office. If Y
Vern or Roger at 227-4008.
Respectfully,
Richard Wedell, President
Municipal Legislative
Gary Bastian, PresidentMunicipal
Commission
associationiof Metrop
MuniciP
2
9
TO: ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITIES
MUNICIPAL LEGISLATIVE COMMISSION
183 UNIVERSITY AVE., EAST
ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101
FROM: CITY OF
YES, OUR CITY WILL PLEDGE $
IF THIS EFFORT CONTINUES.
NO, OUR CITY WILL NOT CONTRIBUTE.
CITY ADMINISTRATOR/MANAGER
04 LEAGUE COORDINATING COMMITTEE
RECOMMENDED RESEARCH PROGRAM FOR
OCTOBER THROUGH JANUARY
The major research tasks recommended for the League
Coordinating Committee through January 15, 1989 are briefly described
below.
The research tasks have been organized into three major
areas of research work.
I. Data Base Additions and Modifications
- Add data on homeowner income related to home value and
tax burden, and develop analytical model for using this
data in conjunction with the property tax model.
- Enhance ability to do regional totals and averages,
constituency group totals and averages and average impact
by property type.
- Add county welfare data.
- Add State Auditor's data on city revenues and expenditvrds
for 1987.
Update data Lase with estimated 1989 data when available
from the Department of Revenue or House Research. Most
recent information indicates that valuation data will
become available in late October, and levy data will be
available one or two months later.
II. Background Research and Analysis of the 1990 Law
The first major research task is th; analysis of the 1990
law, including its structural features and estimated impacts on
property tax burdens. 'this research work may include analysis of
the fiscal characteristics of cities in different regions of the
state, and how those characteristics play a role: in determining the
impact of the 1990 law.
III. Research to Develop Specific Proposals for Consideration by th
The primary objective of this work plan is to develop two
specific proposals that are acceptable to the Constituency Groups.
One of the proposals would include a homestead credit and the other
would not.
�. The research involved in developing a specific proposal is
difficult to describe in detail. It is generally an interactive
-- process. where alternative proposals and their impacts are described
to the Committee, the Committee reacts to those proposals and
provides direction for further research to refine or redirect those
specific proposal that is
alternatives. Dozens or even hundreds of individual computer run
may be needed in oparticipants. a p include the
ts
willacceb
able ed the participants. athioeosalnma Of the system that
will be considered in designing p
following:
Classifications and assessment ratios.
- LGA, disparity aid, and other e4,:elization formulas.
homestead credit, other credits, and, in the case of
The homes
the alternative proposal, transition aid payments or other
programs that replace the homestead credit.
Categorical aids, such as the welfare takeover that are
ate -id aids.
either in addition to or in lieu of othe�os�p
Fiscal disparities or tax base sharing P gams.
income adjusted pruparty tax refunds or an income adjusted
homestead credit.
Extensive computer analysis is needed to assess the
I6
Groups to focus the research
inter -related imp aiorof changes Constituency elements of e system.Policy
will be necessary in the process. without some initial
effort vary early
agreements, the research effort could become unfocused and would
more likely be unproductive. The research ahekmembersthe
offirst
the
several meetings would be designed me heir
Committee reach a preliminary agreement on the direction that the
proposals should take, specific proposals may
The research needed to de P
suggested.
lre�
assuming that the Committee agrees that these
include some of the more specific research tasks aagre Y
by Committee members,
I specific research tasks are needed•ested so far include:
5ume of the specific items sugB city size
Analysis of impact and appropriateness of using
as a basis for distributing aids.
Elimination of split elassifications; impact on tax
burdens and on the distribution of 3 tax systems that do
Research on the design of new property
not require or encourage mill rate buy downs or mill rate
equalization.
Research on single aid programs that could replace the
multiple programs in current law.
1
® _ Research on modifications to 1990 law to refine aid
programs and classification system.
Analysis of property tax burdens by income class.
Research on impact of property tax system changes on the
existing education aid formula and on school district
levies.
Analysis of projected school levy changes for 1990•
of ways to reduce tax burden differences due to
Analysis
differences in tax base. research that
These items illustrate the types of spec..•-
would be undertaken
for
uthe
re oCommit
f therecommendedrret This searcharchiprogramsteThe
with the general
ve to decide as the negotiations a
Committee would hand meetings
progress on the specific research to be done Committee would in
Membership of the League Coordinating roues:
include three members from each of the following B
Minneapolis
St. Paul
Coalition of Greater Minnesota Cities
Association of Met!•opolitan Municipalities
Municipal Legislative Commission
Association of Small Citier
3t,
04 MEMO TO: MAYOR AND CITY COU
FROM: CLERK -ADMINISTRATOR
DATE: SEPTEMBER 20, 1988
SUBJECT: PROPERTY ACQUISITION NEGOTIATIONS FOR 8100
GROVELAND ROAD
Staff has met with Mr. Julian Johnson and his attorney,
Mr. Mike Hurley, regarding the City's proposed acquisition
of 81CO Groveland Road. Our negotiations have comprised
only one meeting which was extremely brief due to the some-
what adamant position taken by Mr. Johnson and his attorney
regarding this acquisition.
Mr. Johnson has indicated that he will not willingly sell to
the City of Mounds View the entire parcel known as 8100
Groveland Road but would sell the 77.5 foot strip of land
running west from Sherwood Road for a distance of approxi-
mately 448 feet. This is the parcel that the City needs at
a mininum in order to accomplish an extension of Knollwood
connecting onto Groveland Road on the southeast corner of
the site. Mr. Johnson also stated that he would accept
nothing less than $45,000 for this property based upon his
analysis that he will loose a minimum of two lots which he
( LL, has valued at $25,000 to $35,000 each and hiri current
values of lots being sold in the City of Mounds View. As
you might recall, our appraisor indicated a value of $38,000
for the parcel Mr. Johnsor, is willing to sell to the City at
this time, an amount $7,000 less than Mr. Johnson's asking
price.
Mr. Johnson and his attorney further agreed that should the
City acquire the property at ':is price, Chey would provide a
marketable title which would require a survey an updating of
the Certificate of Title as this is Torrens property as
well as a Warranty Deed.
I consulted with City Attorney Meyers regarding the cost of
performing a survey and legal work and he advised me that it
would be no where near the $7,000 difference but would
provide a value to the City of approximately $1,000. I also
consulted with City Engineer Ric Minetor regarding the exact
location of the right-of-way necessary for the road
Extension. Mr. Minetor advised me that the City would need
the north 60 feet of the 77.5 foot strip of land in order to
construct the road extension and maintain alignment with
Sherwood Road as it intersects with Groveland Road.
Therefore, the City would have a 17.5 foot strip on the
south side of the site which we could sell to the property
owner on that side providing him with lots having a greater
width, therefore, marketable value. I do not anticipate
that this 17.5 foot strip could be sold to the property
owner to the south for more than a few thousand dollars.
MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
PAGE TWO
SEPTEMBER 20, 1988
Due to the adamant position taken by Mr. Johnson struck andbothmyself
is
attorney regarding the purchase
and City Planner Herman that it would be futile to7atte pt
to bargain v,ith them on the purchaseac ice ofot Therefore,
oot
ze of the City's
Staffstrip and on She sthis iseue back to the Council for your
is brining
consideration and direction. It is Staffs recommendation
that the Council seriously consider the acquiMTti�oof hnsonhe
77.5 foot strip for the price being as
reed by
the
k'e do not feel canaemn 3d on of the
feel thatpthe eacquieitioneoftthis
City in any way
strip of land is essential in order to allow for the future
extension of KthelblockDrive into this rather large area in
the center
Your direction in this matter would be greatly appreciated.
DFP/MJS
J
MEMO TO: MAYOR AND COUNCILMEMBERS ��ym
FROM: MARY SAARION, DIRECTOR
PARKS, RECREATION AND FORESTRY
DATE: SEPTEMBER 23, 1988
SUBJECT: CELEBRATE MN
I attended the workshop meeting held Wednesday, September 21 regarding the
Celebrate MN program and grant application opportunity.
Here is some information you need to know:
1. The project must be accomplished in 1989.
2. The project must be incorporated in a celebration event in 1990.
3. The grant match is $1.00 match to every $3.00 spent; a 1-3 ratio.
4. Grant recipients must purchase two $85.00 Celebrate MN signs for display
at the project site.
5. Project monies cannot be already budgeted.
6. A public hearing must be scheduled to ensure public participation.
7. A project must he one of these three criteria:
a. Beautification.
b. Clean-up.
c. Community improvement.
Here is a list of eligible projects:
1. Demolition, clearance of materials and debris.
2. Sits c13an-up, preparation and grading.
3. Seeding, sodding, planting trees and shrubs.
4. Laniscaping timbers, planting islands.
5. Repair of roofs, foundations.
6. Siding windows, doors, paint, lighting.
7. Sidewalk repair or construction.
8. Exterior and interior rehabilitation of historic structures.
9. Picnic tables and grills.
10. Restrooms, walkways, parking.
11. Fencing, signs.
12. Drinking fountains.
13. Outdoor lighting.
-2-
14. Garbage recepticles.
15. Clean-up of river banks.
16. Flag posts and kiosks.
Listed below in a schedule of significant dates.
December
16, 1988
- The application must
be submitted.
February,
1989
- Grant awards will be
announced.
December
31, 1989
- All projects must be
completed.
1990
- A celebration must follow featuring the project.
Here are some ideas to consider:
1. Landscaping the triangular piece of land along County Road I, Quincy
and Pinewood Drive. It is on an entrance area to the City from Interstate
35W.
Celebration: Festival children's parade from Quincy to City Hall.
2. Replacement of Silver View Park pond pathway from woodchips to crushed
rock.
Celebration: City walk-a-thon.
3. Grading, seeding, landscaping area of Greenfield Park on Hillview and
Quincy to include placement of picnic tables and grill.
Celebration: City 7 CJ
.o.
4. Pavement of Lambert Park parking lot.
Celebration: City sxating party.
5. Installation of two handicapped accessible drinking fountains in Silver
View Park.
Celebration: Softball tournament.-
6. Construction of small picnic shelter at Groveland Park, Lambert, Hillview
or Wooderer.t parka.
Celebration: Neighborhood Picnics or potlucks.
These and other ideas can be discussed at the agenda session. I will be
present to arswer any other questions you may have regarding this program and
grant application opportunities.
MEMO TO: MAYOR 6,.D CITY COUNCIL
FROM: MARY SAARION, DIRECTOR
PARKS, RECREATION AND FORESTRY
DATE: SEPTEMBER 28, 1988
SUBJECT: FUNDING SEARCH FOR SILVER. VIEW PARK POND NfuYAGEMENT PROPOSAL
As directed by Council, staff has pursued funding sources for a pond
management study for Silver View Park. A funding source has not be found.
Requests have been made with:
D;:R - Waterways division
DNR - Wildlife and Foal Division
LAWCON
Fresh Water Biological Institute
U of M Natural Resources Department
None of the above agencies were aware of grants or available funding
resources.
�.._- If the Council is interested in pursuing a management proposal for a pond
management plan beginning this fall, staff recommends the funding $5,500 come
I
rom the contingency fund. If the council prefers to wait, the 1990 budget
could reflect funds for this plan. The 1989 budget does not reflect the
monies needed to pursue the cost of this proposal.
Staff will be present at the agenda meeting to hear your thoughts pertaining
tc this particular prcject.
MS/SL
® TO: Mayor 6 Council n
FROM: Finance Director -Treasurer Brager IIL�
DAT;: September 29, 1988
RE: PROPOSED 1989 GENERAL FUND BUDGET
Agenda Pursuant to Council direction, given at the September 19
Session
followingrevisions rhave tbeenpmadeetoly aprovdwthe Proposedge n1989the
General Fund Budget:
PROPOSED GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES
100-4100-160 Council Supplies
increase Clean up Day costs from + 5,000
$5,000 to $10,000
100-4190-702 City Hall, Capital
decrease costs of flagpoles lighting - 2,000
from $5,000 to $3,000
100-4200-010 Police, Salaries
100-4200-030 Police, Pensions + 6,000
100-4200-050 police, Worker's Comp + 720
TOTAL POLICE
+ 379
$ + increase to reflect adjustment to 7,099
Sergeant's salaries
100-4210-390 Fire Dep't, Subsidy
adjust to reflect contract approved $ - 5,838
for 1989
100-4260-010
100-4260-011
Garage,
Salaries
100-4260-030
Garage,
Garage,
Overtime
Pensions
+ 131
+
100-4260-050
Garage,
Worker's Comp
4
+ 16
TOTAL GARAGE
+ 9
$ + 150
increase to reflect
49'ers Contract
settlement of
40
Page 2
September 29, 1988
2 65
® 100-4270-010 Streets, Salaries
+
+
17
17
100-4270-011 Streets, Overtime
+
33
100-4270-030 Streets, Pensions
+
27
100-4270-050 Streets, Worker's Comp
$ +
342
TOTAL STREETS
increase to reflect settlement of
49'ers Contact
$
6,219
100-4270-703 Streets, Equipment
increase to reflect interest on
Equipment Debt Certificates
$
10,982
REVISED GENERAL FUND EXPENDITUK-S
$ 2,627,715
Attached are departmental budgets and expenditure summaries
reflecting those changes.
To balance the budget, $10,982 wasadded
tothe
Certificate- Certificate. An overall property Y o
be req-Ared to finance this budget. That levy would consist
of the following:
$ 1,002,960
General Fund 30,096
Forestry Fund
Debt $ 8,700
Advance Refunding Bondi 74,960
- Equipment Debt Certificate $66,260 $
$ , 0B4O16
TOTAL LEVY
This proposed levy of $1,108,016 is $74,599 less than the 196o
levy of $1,182,615. Based upon estimated assessed valuations
received from taxsrateoof 13.474the pmills. Thatlevy
ratewould
2.998u1t
in a property
mills less than the 1988.1evy of 16.472 mills.
Should you have any questions please do not hesitate to
contact me.
DB/DS
cc: Clerk -Administrator Pauley
Department Heads
1
)
PAD 1969 CEPEPW_ FUO BLOLET 09/20,188
ACnAL OUNSET
1987 198E
4
GEPERPL GUL&Rfla f
4
City Council
Advisory Co miwions
440nimStration
1
Planning
Elections
Finince
Legal
Public Pbrks
City Hall
1
Total Genera: Co+err t
P.SLIC SAFETY
Police
Fire
1
Civil Defe
PLisarce Abatemnt
1
1
Total Public Safety
1
1
1
1
)
19W 1989 DEPT 1989 TFFM CW CIL % '89 Bl,DGET FEMENT 0=
6 MIMS PAOP00ED PROPOSED APPIMES TO 'E'S BLUET TOTAL
SM.908.00
59,675.00
3'M,785.W
$12,076,00
50.00
$46,/59.00
$44,159.00
$49,159.00
64.86%
1.7D%
194,873.00
577, 537.W
$D.W
$0.00
$12,500.00
S1W,522.00
410.00D.W
SW,272.00
59,100.00
$W,272.00
-17.19%
0,38%
SO.03
$87.Cn
$52,655.00
SO.00
540,6:6.00
$53,642.00
$0,642.00
28.04E
1.87%
3.81%
2.06%
3105,700.00
$7,124.00
$101,734.00
$0.00
W.00
V.320.00
5104,524.00
$4.eM.00
5104,124.W
S4=.W
-32.34%
0.19%
$91,178.00
$66,450.00
SO.W
581,475.W
$81,475.00
5104,12a.00
$81,475.00
2.35t
22.Al%
4.ODt
3.13%
$91,992.W
$00.304.00
$69,703.W
$242,609.00
S0.00
567,343.00
$69,160.00
$69,160.00
-0.78%
2.66%
$3.00
5280,285.00
$276,C84.00
$284,084.00
13.80%
10.6m
$6C8,707.W
$6%.668.00
$0.00
$735,754.00
$742,736.00
5754,B36.00
MIA
28.52E
i648,311.00
$134,702.00
$696,555.00
1129,B26.00
$0.00
$760,816.00
$751,776.00
$764,875.00
8.79%
29.10%
535,564.CO
528,956.00
$0.00
$0.00
$142,776.00
316,=.CO
$142,776.00
$16,303.00 '
$136.939.00
516,30:.00
9.97%
5.48%
$6,915.00
$9,638.00
$0.00
$9,909.00
$9,909.00
$9,909.00
-43.70%
2.81%
0.63%
0.38i
$825,512.00
5864,975.0)
SOM
5927,804,00
=6.764.00
VM.025.W
7.14%
35.5%
PROPOSM 1969 GMAIL
FUA) eLDCET
(CQ4T.)
09/20/ee
3
RC1WL
BLCGET
1950
1989 IEPT
19e9 TEAM
COLHCIL
k 'e9 SLC Er
PERMW OF
3
1957
1988
6 f37NTH9
PR0PUTD
PPLPQSc0
APPR0.E5
TO 'SB SLOGEI
TOTPL
STFEETS " HIQ"YS
I �
t7mintterurtce Garage
ts
.71,719.00
$71,622.00
$0.00
$82,660.00
SF.1,556.00
Sel,716.00
13.67k
3.13%
i
5L16,824.OD
$239,653.10
SO.W
$36S,e49.00
$353,546.00
S_'S63,440.00
47.52k
13.53%
) Total Sheds 4nd H19haaYs
$108,543.00
S311,7.75.00
SO.00
$151,7GO.00
US5.102.CJ
$145,156.00
39.78%
16.71%
GARKS AND 3ECFPRTIR!
3
Re cation
$122,054.00
$128,615.00
$0.00
1153,ZB5.00
$147,181.00
S147,751.00
14.90%
5.67%
Parks
S142,629.00
$1CS,641.00
$0.00
$c'170,342.00
$195.313.00
$195,313.00
79.78%
7.SGk
3
Total Parks and Recreation
$264.6S3.00
$237,256.'0
$0.00
S353,627.00
$343.094.OG
s343.074.00
44.61%
13.1h
O77ER IMMMES (DErFEAS S)
1 ConLirmnoy
SO.00
S57,225.00
$U.00
$5010.U.00
$50,000.00,
s50,ccom
-12.63%
1.92%
Salary Adyu wts
$0.03
$64.410.00
$0.00
$65,685.00
S65,6.5.00
$65,685.00
1.9%
2.52%
Transfers to Otter Furd-
S0.00
$0.00
SO.C3
S110,146!'0
$40,919.00
$40,919.00
100.00%
1.57%
Pe=erve for Capital
$0.00
50.00
$0.00
'7.W
$0.00
S0.00
300.00k
O.OD%
TOTTL GQERPL FUD
S1,E>37,445.00 S2,191,e09.00
S0.00 52,699,7 .W S2,604,300.00 $2,627,715.00
IS.m
1W.00t
1
I
1-
1
PROPOSED 1989
(EPERAL FUO BUDGET
09/20/88
BY D a DIIUIE
TYPE
)
' )
PCPAL
1986
ACT.VL
1907
BUDGET
199E
1988
1989 DEPT
1989 TEAM
COUNCIL
% 'B9 bLr"T
PER:ENT CF 1
6 r10 M
PROPOSED
PROPOSED
APPROVES
TO '88 BUDGET
lUTAL
)
PEf-TEFL SERVICES
$I,=.037.03
51,104„A*.00
$1,201.213.O0
50.00
41,333,692.00
51,344,041.00
51,350,742.00
S1.EiY
N4TERIPLS r E1Nq..IE0
493.6`JJ.6
$97,600.00 ,
f93, 114.U0
91.00
5135,m5.M
4133,514.00
5140,511.00
.1.B9t
43.=
1
5.136
UTORIMUL 6tIN10ES
$603,717.73
1575,027.00
5610,152.00
$0.00
5632,332.00
5604,806.00
$596,968.00
-0.88%
23.22%
)
CAPITAL OUTLAY
%ISC DISMEEKNTS
S306,525.13
$9,000.00
$1101170.00
$0.00
$165,695.00
$0.00
$372,425.00
S365,335.00
$3822,887.00
120.45k
14 03% I
$121,635.00
W.CO
$225,831.00
$156,c04.00
$156,604.00
28.75%
6.01%
I
TOTAL
f2,C47,930.76
S1,OB7,445.00
$2, 191,8:9.00
50.00
$2,699,725.00
52,604,300.00
52,627,715.00
1P.82;
100.00% �Yk -'
L
S.L
1
1
1
1
)
I
r
i.
)
)
1
CITY OF tlo_tVS VIEW
l00-J100 CFSERPL F.NO
Ila1 DESCAIPTIUI
1
PER974,EL SERVICES
010 SXMIES, IE1,11
dp yy_ARIES, TETIP/FPAT-TII£
1
OM pag9l" �ERJICES
TOTAL TERSCNEL '
tNTERIALS + SUPR.IES
160 SUPFLIES. OPERATING
210 OODK9 + FF ODICILS
TOTAL pATEAIIYS + 3.51RIES
CONTpORM SERVICE'S
P YMIML S
CMFR EAV
303
341 LM%-NOTICES
1
343 PRINTING
361 WAERWIP5
1
39OqS+ M6
390 31DIES
TOTAL OQNTAACTUFL SER/ICES
I
GfwC) TOTAL CITY ODYCIL
1
1
FxPEr41ITUTES
09/20/08
-
IEPAATre4TAL BUDGET DETAIL
- :989
r.:
CITY u..T' CIL
19M
I�
OTt 7M
TEPM
tE0,E3T5
DO.WIL
PAPIiOVES
i',h:
1597
p:TllfT_
buUET. 1
6
ACTIYl
-
fl'_.8W.00
�,..p
SIf.8C0.00
S16,B00.00
S1 915.00
S16,B00.00
S3,915.Co
513,80o.00
S13,BW.CU
$1,712.0D
40.00
f.1,915.00
a.M
r144.00
S1,422.00
S1.Ym.w
$36.00
50.00
f0.00
i244.CN
$18,959.00
+
$18,959. 00
S18,959.W
..-.`
$3.26
$15,225.26
$L',764.00
$15,552:00
$0.00
�•0D
f0.00
50.00
$0.00
412,100.00
$O.OD
S12r100.00
$0.00
$19,1$0.00
--
$0.00
S4,949.74
$7,436:00
f4,100.00
$0.00
50.00
$0.00
$0.f)D
50.00
$12,1C0.00
519,LOO.UO
$0.00
317.00
v,436.00
S4,1C7.00
$0.00
S12, L00.00
$4,949.74
SO.OD
$1,059.1J
$D.00
$0.00
�.�
90.00
$6.750.00
$0.00
$4,750.01
$0.00
S4,750.00
50.00
$607.36
5468.00
51,500.00
$0.00
sr co
�.00
$0.00
$825.00
$B25.00
-i
533.70
5350.00
S11B.00
$756.00
.00
Ai.G]
SO.07
�.00
f1,275.00
51,275.00
$1,275.00
S4,250.00
-_
-
$a79.D5
$374.00
$1,850.00
�.�•00
$T1.00
56,250.00
$6.250.00
$13,100.00
411, 100.00
$1,933.00
52.433.00
S517CB.CO
57.133.00
$0.03
$15,100.00
$3,403.11
$0.00
E4b, 159.00
$44,159.00
449,159.00
$23,578.11
428,908.00
526,7B5.00
i
n
0
,
CITY OF NGUNDS VIEW
DEPART(ENffk BURET
DETAIL -
1989 E
(pE DITL ES
09/20/gg
1CO-4150 Gr7EfA'L FINE)
CITY HALL
ITEM DESCRIPTION
1966
ACTUIL
ACTUAL
BUDGETED
6 MOTS
TEAM
COWCq
AENIESTS
REO_ESTS
PER90YN Nc1 SERVICESAPPRTrES
U10 SNARIES, AEGLLAR
O11 WE9TIME, RE0.UL7
$7,165.40
:15,556.W
516,453.W
EO.W
2.
516,95. W
$16,952.W
f16,952.W
020 SALARIES, TQP/PART-TIME
c1,SS6i ��n
<a
'��'.0w0
$0.00
SO.W
SO.m
030 FENSl0�6
OA
$1,261.01
.0
$1,772.00
51,935.W
w.CVOJ
$0.00
W'W
$0.W
OR" R SUR*JCE
050 PAPoERS CO`PEWATIM
S496.9C
52.5.91
$1,013.00
$2.250.00
$1,994.W
$2.430.03
s1.994.00
S2,k-0.CO
$1.994.00
$L,43C.W
1 TOTAL. PERSaM SERVICES
3.2,512.22
i60.W
SSE,950.W
ESG.W
".L:4.00
$0.W
SO.OU
-21,444.00
$21,4444.00
$21,444.00
MATERIALS 4 s miES
III STATIOERY
112 CLAY MAIERIR.S
5597.10
$1, 764.81
$644.00
$1,9855.00
$78U.W
$0.W
3750.0
E650.0
$650.W
KDSC CFF
114 f49C CFFICE S/P0.IEi
$9,5%.05
$10,694.00
$2,GW.00
$6,500.00
�•00
s0.0
$2,OW.W
$2,000.00
$2,00.0
114
BOUIRI AdID3
160 Sl/PFLIES, EO.IIFTfllf
s1,309.05
$618.W
$1,708.W
42,COD.W
s0.00
S7,5W.W
r:000.W
$7,SW.W
S1,50.0
$7,SW,W
S1,50.0
160 SUPRLIES, OPERATING
51.191.4E
30.00
s5m.00
sO.00
$2,000.00
$p.W
1 TOTAL MATERIALS + SUPPLIES
$15,075.49
SIS.531.00
$13,290.00
$0.00
$0.03
52,500.W
$21500.00
$2,500.00
514,750.W
$14,IEO.00
$14,150.00
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
303 CTFER PRFE 3ICNcL SEW
$85.0D)
$130.00
$0.00
S0.00
310 COMNICATDOI9-TELER4E
32L
$14,301.51
$12.902.00
$13,Wo.m
SO•W
S0.W
'ro•W
$0.00
ELECTRICITY
$9.380.20
$10,361.W
210,272.00
S1E,272.00
$18,272.00
1 322 POTTAGE ffS
SS,015.82
45,24B,W
$9, 270.W
$0.00
SS9,
$10,150-00
T10.150.00
3T0 PT18TA(E
343 PRINTING
$7,852.05
a.,0w.W
$7.FAO.W
sO.W
740.00
$7,500.W
59,740.W
S7.`AO.W
$9.740.W
351 JPNITOP SERVICE
$4,817.70
$6,040.00
$4,839.00
$6.397.00
$5.000.00
$17.W
$7.690.00
$7,SW.W
$5,634.W
353 REFUSE OLLECMILN
S3W'W
4726.W
$7,320.W
E0.00
47,817.00
$7,634,W
$
5
355 CLE*rtr-T%ELS ♦ RAGS
36w.50
T481. W
$300.W
S.N.00
$0.00
EBI7.W
$700.00
$7W.00
$70U.W
$7W.W
1 363
$
$8, 121.W
�,300.00
$0.00
$0.00
$550.00
1550.00
$550.00
TRAINING
� TIIF�E
$215.93
s2I5.81
$O.00
$0.00
E9, 300.00
E8,705.W
$E,706.00
480
$408.33
23.00
$128.IX�
$2W.W
$0.W
S0. W
RENTAL,IN9JW EQRRTENT
T9,4W.33
57,563.W
$T.000.W
T�'W
00.W
TSW.00
00.00
$SW.W
0 BAYOU
$65,727.87
$71,143.00
591,344.W
$O.W
511 REP.,
511 REP., 8LDG5 ! GPOJvDS
S3,M2.36
$982.W
'$3,OCO.W
$0.W
g7d,728.W
878,7�.W
57E,7?4'.W
513 REPAIRS, EQUIH4TT
T8,201.10
$19,166.W
$17,S19.00
$0.00
54,700.W
$4,700.W
34,7W.W
TOTAL GON(RACTUAL SERVICES
$)45,169.18
5155.243.W
S1W,635.W
90.00
$15.22J.W $IF,220.W S15,220.W
$177.701.00 $t75;7A0.00
G175,930.00
CAPITAL OUTLAY
702 BLDr, ♦ STRUCTURES
703 EQUIFt4TT
52,982.35
$O.W
$0.00
$25,O00.W
$7.W
T25,0.U.W 525,N0.W T28,OW.W
1 TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY
$2,sEr.35
SSEJ.W
35w.00
$3.'W.W
$2g.0W.03
9J.00
51;,3'O-0o $31.500.00 $44.50.X
SO-W
566.390.00 554.500.00
$72.500.00
GPAW TOTAL CITY PYL
$175,129.24
$190,304.00 $242,609,00
$0.00 $280,2J5.T0 m6.084.00
M.064.W
1
11
R
I
1
CITY OF MXtCg VIEW
100-420U GDERAL FLM
I ITE01 DESCRIPTION
fERSML SERVICES
r 01O SfLAFZE.S, REOLLAR
Oil MERTOB, rE0_I.PR
1 023 SMARIES, TEMP/PART-TL£
030 ftw. s
C40 GF" I EUWCE
1 050 F[1RNEr8 COIPEIPoATIa1
TOTAL FER9aTII. SERVICES
1 MATERIALS ' WIPLIES
Ill STATIOEW
121 9JPFU S, MLCS+GRW
T 160 9JPF.IES, OPERATING
170 IGTTY4 FIELS + LUBRICANT
210 BOORS + PERIODICALS
1 240 INFORM * CLOTHINI
TOTAL MTERLJL.S + SUPPLIES
1 (TMfh1CRYL SERVICES
363 OOER P,ACTESSIaM SERV
MO Ca4tNICATIO G-TELERDE
R 343 PRINTLNG
361 teBERSHIPS
362 OWEFOICEa
1 363 TRAINIfG
2BO MILEAGE
390 GPWTS + SLBSIDIES
1 513 REPAIRS, ECIJ Plan
TOTAL OONrRACTLA- SERVICES
CAPITAL OUTLAY
'M BLDG + STRCTUFES
703 EGUIPYJ.T
' 704 VEHM CS
1'O'rAL CAPITAL O,RiAY
) GAGA TOTAL POLICE
MPARTI£NTPL BUDGET DETAIL - 1989 UPMVDITURES 09/20/88
POLICE
1986 IS97 1588 1988 CEPARIMNr TEAM OIICIL
ACTU'L ACTUAL BUDGETED 6 MM1G MOLESTS rMJFSTS APPROVES
T421,158.06
545O,364.OG
5471,290.O0
$0.00
5512,403.00
S'_12,401C.00
$5I8,403.00
S8,117.70
$4,663.W
S4,5W.W
$0.00
$4,500.00
$4,500.00
$4,SW.W
$6,100.00
$9,555.00
$13,755.00
50.00
$10.046.00
$1C,O46.00
51O,046.00
952,416.26
s54,7a3.W
558,E/U.W
'9J.00
$66,1O1.00
$[6,187.00
$66,907.00
$21,475.03
$22,978.00
$31,230.00
$0.00
SM,150.00
$36.150.00
$36,150.AO
S16.7'4.SB
$'27,277.00
$23.554.00
$3.00
531,597.00
331,597.00
Si1,W6,00
5526,001.93
5569,622.00
S.02.?C9.W
V1.00
566O,683.00
$660.883.00
$667,582.00
$42.00
$0.00
$75.00
$O.W
$100.00
$0.00
SO.00
$450.98
$667.00)
$10O.00,
$D.:O
si5i1.W
$350.00
S-W.W
$1,.00.19
$1,791M
52,O3O.0D
$G.W
$2,2W.00
52,200.0O
$2,200.00
S15,O9B.25
$12,858.0r)
$15,500.00
$0.00
.$14,410.00
$14,410.00
514,410.CO
M..50
$0.00
S0.CO
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$5,133.91
$6,316.00
$5,83O.00
$O.W
S6,I80.00
$6,180 CO
$6,!BO.CO
wn. 120.83
$2!,632.W
E23,535.W
$O.00
$23,240.00
$13,140.00
$23,140.00
SG53.c5
$655.00
$2,3O0.00
$0.00
$7,500.00
S2.5M.00
$1,500.0O
$18,444.00
SIB,865.O7
52O,778.00
$0.00
526,421.00
$26.421.00
:M,421.30
SS_tS.W
5-504.00
.900.00
$0.00
$i.IOU.W
$900.00
$V'CO.W
5145.00
$125.00
116O.0O
SO.00
$220.W
E22O.00
5220.0O
$452.50
$21.00
$O.W
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.O0
$2.662.02
93,417.00
$3,50O.00
$0.00
$4,500.00
$4.500.00
$4,54W.W
549.29
MOO
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$I.0O
$12,497.00
$11,9S4.00
$12,5S3.CO
$0.00
$13.212.00
$13,212.00
$13.212.00
Tm.05
E1,663.00
$I,84O.W
$O.W
$1.8•A.00
$1,600.00
51,600.0c)
E36,328.51
SM,234.00
$42,061.00
SOX-)
$49,793.00
$49.353.00
$49,353.CJ
$2,475.00
S0.O0
$C.00
SO.W
MOO
$0.00
$7.W
$1,4CG.55
$9.128.00
$7,3CO.O0
$O.00
°.5,'a?].W
$4,400.00
N.4JO.00
$'.3,916.58
:11.675.00
$23,67O.W
$$O.J0
M.0I0.00
$20,000.00
SMICOC-00
$17,797.13
519.823.0D
$27,970.00
30.0:
$26,90O.W
S24,400.00
S14,400.00
$612,248.40 M48,311.W $696,555.00
$O.00 $760,816.0j $757,776.0) $764.875.0O
Y
1
1
CITY OF rour05 VIEW DEPAP,iTf7fT{>L SUIYET DETPIL - 1959
1 LOD•4210 �L FLAD FIRE EKPe4DIT11PES 09/20/88
IIEM DESCPIPTIQ4 1936
DEPARTMa
PCTI� 1987 19� )
f1CTlpL BIIDCJ:TFD 6 1t"G TEAMREOESTS REMESTS APPPOVE9
) Q?4IRPCTLI7L SERVICES
TOOT.x S165lrpE^,,W f'2,A�, 54 i134,702.0U f129,B26.Oo )
Se2,968.54 SL34,702.00 f129,826.00 $'00 f142,776.00 $142,776.00 $156,M8.00
$O.CO f142,775,OD f142,776.00 $136,930,Cp
GW;z T0T✓1. FIFE
f62,95E.34 5134,702.O0 f129,826.00
30.W f142,776.00 f142,776.00 f136,9.2M,CC
a
- ,taw
-� irl k
rr t
1 -
1
1
)
1
CITY OF MXMS VIEW
DEPARTMENTAL BIIOTET
IETAIL - 1939 DF£j R?E$
p9;20/ag
100-4260 f£IEPAL FUA
MAINTEPWE GARAGE
1 ITEM DESCRIPTIRI
1966
19B7
1988
1988
RCTWL
ACTUAL
BUDGETED
6 G
DEPART11W
RE0.ESTS
TEAM
CMM R
FERSON£L SERVICESK71R
REOXMS
APP
1 010 SALARIES, REGLIAR
O.£R£, REGIAR
$24,619.07
68.16
sr 9CO.00
$25.264.0O11
$0.00
$26.023.OD
$26,12S.03
$26256.00
SALARIES, TEMP/PART
$634.00
$461.00
$000
,
$758.00020
030 FENSIaG
GROUP iNDA xE
.
$2,920.37
$
$2,S69.00
$3,025.00
10.00
SD'OO$3,15OOD
$0.00
$0.00
MOOOQ
WORKERSCMEN
$1,9.1
$285.01
$2,.00
$3,2.00
$0.00
..0
$3,161.00
$3,17.00
I TOTAL PM-SESERVICES
t
r,103.00
tM.2A3.00
, .
S32,153.T1
$0.00
S1,521.00
.400.00$2,400.OU
$1,512.00
$1.521.00
TWTFFIPLS +SUFLIE9
$O.00$386.00
3.952.00i34,112.00
1 120 SUPPLIES, HAIIREW.NCE
$0.00
40.00
121 SUPPLIES, BLDfH+GFN)S
l22 SIAp_I�, V[}rICLE
f63B.:d
66.00
$I,866.00
i320.00
$0.00
$O.OU
$0.00
$0.00
1 123 ,1,7iLIES. EWIFrt.YT
$5,473.65
$2,780.32
$IO,R71.07
$2,55S.-O
S101802.00
1,
1l IO
21.W
513,321.00
00.W
,021.00
$$2,929.00
f4M.0)
160 SUKLIES. Ci'-MTlt4
170
$5,893.35
S5,425.00
$2 582.00
$6,241.00
$0.00
S4,929.00
$2,929.OD
S2,021.00
E2,924.W
MOTOR FUELS + IABPICANT
1 240
$5.760.33
$6.623.CO
$7, �'`b
A.00
�, ''.G0
"-875.00
$4,B9S.00
UNIFORMS + 0,OTHIM
1593.30
$543.00
$496.00
$0•00
$11,203.00
$11,203.00
$11,273.00
TOTAL MATERIPLS + SUFR S
i21,139.31
$27,886.00
S27,941.00
$0.00
5456.Op
$516.00
1 [QITRRCTIIAL SETNIrES
SO.00
%32.BD4.00
$31,964.OD
$31,%4.00
321 ELECTRICITY
322 NATl1RAL GAG
I
$2,281.84
S3.254.75
$!,698.00
$2,366.OD
$2,7B2.O0
54,500.00
$0.00
$2.921.00
$2;921.OD
$2,921.00
353 RFABE C0IECTIGN
$1,042.10
$I,B7s.00
$1,260.00
30.00
$4,725.00
$4,725.00
%4,725.W
+ RIGS
$18.00
$0.00
S248.00
$0.00
$1,386.0:
$L,3%.00
$1.386.00
1
401 RENTAL
401 RENTAL, EMINENT
392.75
$114.00
$240.00
$0.00
$27B.o0
S27B.CA
511 REP., eLDGS + GROW
'rEHICLE,
$1,300.00
�•�
�•�
�.�
2250.00
$250.00
$ti0.0u
$250.00
512 REPAIR.
$801.9d
$0.00
$1,040.00
$0•00
$0.00
$0,00
$0.00
I
513 f¢PAfPS, ECIIRIIJT
$1,041.68
$ST/.Op
$260.OD
'JO.W
$1,520.00
$%0.00
$960.00
TOTAL COWRACTIXL SERNIES
$9,883.10
$6,630.00
$l0,330.00
$0.00
$32D.00
$32D.00
$3p.00
$O.CO
S11.4OO.00
S10,840.00
S10,840.00
CAPITAL LUiI.gY
1
702 BLDG + STR.CTUPES
703 EOUIRfNi
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00MOO
$0.00
1
TOTAL CAPITA. CUTAY
$0.00
$G.00
$0.00
$0.00
SL12OJ.OD
$112oo.00
$4,8C0.Oo
$D.00
$4.B0p.00
00.00
aa.eoo.00
20.00
�l.m
a,soo.n7
$a,B1r.A7
;4,800.00
GW4D TOTAL MAINTID44CE CPAACE
$61,471.9-1
$71,719,00
$71,622
50.00
.00
$H2,B60.0p E81,556.00
SS1,716.00
)
9
r
1
1
1
1
�.4
�. .� � .. i
®
C
CITY OF moms VIEW
DEPPRTFENTAL BUDGET DETAIL - 1989 EXFFJIDITUFEO
09/20/88
100-4260 GEFEPAL FUND
MINTE74M
GARAGE
IRO$ DESCRIPTION
TEAM
0OUNCIL
AC�
ACTLPL
BUXETED
6 t40H9
fEORSSTT T9
PEO.ESTS
APPFVVE5
PERSTAEL SERVICES
1
010 ° LES, FEOIAR
$24,619.07
$29,800.00
$25,264.00
$0.00
$26,023.00
526,125.00
V6,256.00
O11 OVERTIME, REOLLAR
$568. 16
S634.00
$461.00
20.00
$762.00
$754.00
$758.00
o20 -,4 IES, TEMP/PART-Ti`F.
50.07
$0.00
30.00
$0.00
.YU.CO
MOD
$0.00
i
030 T@SIQG
S2,420.17
S2,569.00
$3,023.00
$0.00
S3,150.00
S3,161.00
S3,177.00
040 GROUP INDA'AME
$1,957.10
S2,097.00
$2,70.00
$0.00
$2.400.00
S2.400.0i
$2.400.CO
050 kDAMM COPIADCATION
SM.01
$2,103.00
$1,181.00
$0.00
$1,521.00
$1,512.00
$1,521.00
7
TOTAL PERSRM SERVICES
$.'U0.449.51
$37,203.00
$32,151.00
$0.00
$33,856.00
SM.952.00
$34,112.00
MATERIALS + S1PPL1E8
1
120 M;--IES, MINWANCE
$0.00
$0.00
$0.M
K.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
121 S.P4' TES, BLDfa54GZDS
$639.36
$1.866.00
$520.00
$0.00
$0.00
$400.00
$400.00
122 SUPPLIES, VEHICLE
$5,473.65
$10,871.00
S10,002.00
SO.00
$13,321.00
$12,021.00
$12,021.00
1
123 SJPFLIES, BUIR194T
$2,780.32
$2,559.00
$2,582.00
$0.00
S2,929.00
S2,929.00
$2,929.00
160 WIPLIES, OPERATING
$5,873.35
$5,425.00
$6,241.00
SmIn
$4.095.00
$1.895.00
S4,895.00
170 MOTOR FLE1S + LUBRICANT
$5,760.33
$6,623.CO
S7,500.00
$0.CO
$11,203.10
S11,203.00
$11,203.00
240 WIFORS + 011THM7
$593.30
S543.00
$416.00
$0.00
$456.00
$516.00
$516.00
TOTAL MTERIA.d + SUPFLIES
$21,139.31
$27,586.00
$27,941.00
$0.00
S32.104.00
$31.%4.00
$31,%4.00
1
COaTRACRYt SERVICES
321 ELECTRICITY
$2,281.64
$1,699.00
$2,782.00
$0.00
S2,921.00
$2,921.UI
$2,921.00
322 MTUPPL G4
$3,254.75
S2,366.00
S4,500.00
$0.00
S4,725.00
$4,725.00
$4,72,.00
353 1E IXLLECTION
$1.042.10
$1,875.00
$I,060.00
$0.00
$1,336.00
$1,386.00
$1.386.00
355 CLEANING-TCVFL4 + RAGS
$18.00
10.00
$248.00
$0.00
$278.00
$278.00
S278.00
401 RENTAL, EgARENT
$W.75
$114.01)
$240.00
$0.00
$1r0.00
$250.00
S250.00
1
511 REP., %= + GR3.NDS
$1,300.00
$0.00
$O.Oo
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
512 REPAIR, VMICLES
S851.98
$0.00
$1,040.00
$0.00
$1,520.00
$960.00
$960.00
513 PEPAIR3, ECUIFPENT
S1,041.68
$577.00
$260.00
30.00
S320.00
$320.00
$320.00
I
TOTAL CCNTFMTISY. SERVICES
S9,8133.10
$6,630. O7
$10,330.00
$0.00
S11,400.00
$10.M.0$
S10,W.00
I
CAPITAL OJRA4Y
1
702 MM + STRUC'IXES
$0.J0
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
It
703 EOJIPTENT
$0.00
50.00
$1,200.00
•A.UJ
$4,MOO
$4,900.00
S4,600.00
I
TDTUY. CAPITAL OURAY
50.00
$O.CO
$1,200,00
10,00
$-111CO 0
$.1,800.00
S4,800.00
G;W1D TOTAL MINM NCE GgRPrE
$61,471.92
$11,719.00
$71,622.03
MOD
S82,850.00
Id1.556.00
S81,716.00
)
)
)
CITY CF MLWS VIEW
DEPARTMITPL BLOC£T DETAIL - 1969 EXPBOIRM
09/20/M
100-4270 GeEPAL FUN)
STFEETS
ITEII DESCRIPTYN
1966
1987
19TE
1988
DEPARTTE7TT
TEAM
CCRIMIL
ACTLFL
ACTL4L
BIOCETED
6 MaRMS
FEPLESTS
FEOl.9TS
APPFCSS
FEFGDND- a...ViM-9
020 SALARIES, FEOAAR
$24,234.36
$25,611.00
$U,199.00
$0.00
$61,946.00
$62,569.00
$62.834.00
011 MERTkE, FEMLPR
51.121.72
$681.00
$1, 194.00
$0.00
$2,841.00
$2,841.00
52,858.00
030 PENSI S
$2,FM.21
a ,9B2.00
$4,3+'8.00
$0.00
S7,582.00
$7,655.00
57,6M.00
040 GAGA PGA MM
S1,%0.00
$2, 100.00
$2,970.03
SC.00
55.610.00
$5,610.00
$5,610.00
050 WFWER9 CO94PLi1TICN
$757.88
$1.056.00
$3,011.00
$0.00
56,378.00
$6,440.00
56,467.OU
TOTAL PERSWEL SERVICES
530,972.17
532,440.00
$47,772.00
SO.00
$84,357.00
$85,115.00
$85,457.00
MTERENLS f SIPFLIES
T 124 OUPAL-IFS, SUMS
53,87d.40
$4,069.00
51,980.G)
$0.00
$2),585.00
$12,Ofl5.00
$12,085.00
125 S^Ft.IES, UTILITIES
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
50.00
126 9 *LIES, TRPFFIC CO•JTROL
$6,587.75
52,642.(O
$7,678.00
90.00
$3,400.00
13,400.OJ
$3,400.00
1 127 SUPPLIES, SW ffTOYAL
$0.00
$0.00
MCI()
$0.00
$0.00
$8,500.00
$9,500.00
160 9MIES, OTMTING
1427.47
$114.00
5923.00
$0.00
$1,069.00
$1,069.00
$1,069.00
240 WIFOFM 4 CLOTHIIG
$402.30
$356.00
$503.00
50.00
51,111.00
$1,111.00
SI.II1.00
1
TGTA_ YATEP.IPS + 9URLIES
$11,375.92
$7,181.00
$6,094.00
So.00
$26,165.00
$26.165.00
$26,165.00
1 OWrF=TUPL SERVICES
303 OTHER PFDFESSIOWL SERVICi
51,079.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
124 STFEET LIGHTS
S3I.B64.11
$29,664.00
$36,940.00
$0.00
W5,461.00
SM,000.00
533,000.00
1 325 TWFIC SIG M - ERECT
$4,377.84
57,0%.00
$4,510.00
$0.00
$4.736.00
$4.736.00
$4,736.0)
$0.00
357 STFEET SEEMS
$5,100.00
54.975.00
510,100.00
$0.00
S1.0,O00.00
SD. 00
0
$0.00
358 %M 0.WING - SFNODG
S-310,429.43
S20 479.00
530
50.00
80.00
f0.00
$0.00
.00
363 TPAINTNG
513 FEMIRS, EOJIRle4T
$0.00
79.00
$2,450.00
$247.00
$0.00
TM3.00
$29o.00
SM.00
TOTAL CONTRACTUti- SERVICES
572,850.38
$64,664.00
$81,797.00
$O.CO
550,477.00
$M.016.00
$38,016.00
CAPIT
702PLBLDG +YSTOXTLYES
$0.00
M.M
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
E0.00
$0.00
703 EWIWENT
$0.00
512.W3.00
514,000.00
SJ.CO
$117,650 M
5114,250.00
$123.H02.00
705 CQSTFMTION
5144.978.98
SO.0)
650,000.00
$D.00
S"O,000.00
S90,OOC.00
S90,C00.00
TOTAL CAPITA. OUTLAY
5144,978.98
S12, 39.00
5104.COO.00
$0.00
$207,850.00
$204,250.00
5213,9Y .OJ
GPAPO TOTAL STTEETS
$260,177.45
$116,824.00
$239,653.00
IC.W
$.T68,049.00 5353,546.00 $363,00,00
00
)
1989 f{3EWL FIDD FeMLE
ag/20/BB
Estimated
Gerarel�
Actual
1906
Actual
1987
Budget
19GB 1969
$66g.215
£71474, 51.0$4 9�90 Sl,
S4; 72
3010 Q+rren C Ad VAiorOm
$4,729
S0
SO
3015 Deiin74ent Ad Valorem
Tax - Current
$6.360
$7,66
433
so
SO
3025 7Ybile 1kvv
30711 rrbils Hk w Tax - Del.
42,079
$3 624
6m
41
i2,241
42.207
.p70 penalties a Inte�est
Hma Pcalty 6 Int
$131
%
%•�
SO
$2 708
S3,OB0
3072 Mobile
30M Forfeited Tax Sales
41,7,u9
__
li $1,0L2,699
(,10 ral Property Tam
%86,907
S737, ZS
,023,591
Total
Liars, a permits
_ -- -
S50.704
$38000
17
S54,3795
:S70D Licence
551,400
S4771,220
3200 Permits
$134,507
591.801
uce,112
1 t
Lice a Permi
$102,104
Total
1
Fires S Forfeits
�' 466
341,724
$54,978
94. 199
$41.724
$4,201
Mn.Ct.
3110 p"�V CtY• Patrol
to Hi9twaY
%'924
$4.273
31L,014
$L4,SC0
SL2,734
37P0 Min'
$14,452
37W Admin. Offer5es
vA,862
$57,01�676
S58,659
i Total Fires S ForfaiL
Intar9O---` ental P-__' ie
S210.39J
4210,261
$0
$0
3315 Hwn tead CrFadl�t td Cr.
49,212
58'905
3569,146
021,698
331b Mobile Ha
fxwern=nC Aid
$Sa5,179
5569.153
°.+48.9'W
553.105
$te.?
3321 Lcoal
3322 Polity Aid
$40 l56
$6 613
$6.ed�
%,2C0
S55,966
5$5,721
3323 Civil Deferoe
3371 Street Aid
455,866
$10,746
$14.3L2
�.`�
C00
55,721
33o0 Other C:'ants In Aid
_
----
$867,359
__.
36G8,417
$944,631
Total Inter9Iia1 FM_+eru 4878,420
averfy;o
)
n
09/20/88
4jment=ervioes
'x9% lictu31
1 --"
8,ylyt
1997 e EStIMteo
3401 51bdlvision
iSS9
3402
E750
1 34M Reliance
enirg
341Adiinistrative
$975
W $200 $757
E350 200
$50
Clvyge
3415 Ala*in. p Se _ tbn Re'und
S50 E350
ES Slop
h
342211 Police
SIOD so
so $1.200 so
3422 is
$2,722 $1,1963 a1,200
3423 en[s/Capift
Custorar SONlcee
$259 $1,774
S271 E:50
3475 Dog In�n!!r� Foes
3475 t44Gr tales
5740 $212
E151 5300
S!94 $ISO
$223
SO
Total Current Servicog
$0 S0 EO
t4,65S 43
S3.924 —'�
Other Revert�es
$3'S00 S3,512
3601 Irvert$"t Interest
3611 Sale of ASv4ts
1 3612 9tsale of tb
$57.557 s5 .us $5213%
3621 Festival Cd'lalssiion
$55,000
E21 $0
34i1 Park Oedicatiws
I
$Vs
$4so
,219 $4,260 E0 $03651
�,0
3661 Trart4fr er5 RalirbursE. enan t;
$137 $0 $4.172
3692 Loan R
$245,a24 Sul $0
1909 S241,553
$5,049
Total o tier
$$359,4S$0
815,000 $0 51,50p E3,S
FeN.•�Ls
E327,e32
tJwr!✓nverue
$142,267 S299,643 $488 721
3520 SLrctarge
305p A proorutinn-Fund Sal.
3317 Otter N
�0
SIt6
Reyes
lots! ��
S
X $10,768 E10,181 S11,3S1
150 E10,934 110,681
TOTAL (,p.ERAL FINDS2•CbS•pa%
Ell,3d1
g1,953,537 S2,191,509
$2.627,715
)
)
1
GeERFL FLM REVDM
1 BY F1MLE SOURCES
1
Ge al Property Taxer
Licenses 6 Permits
Fires 6 Forfeits
1 Inter9mvrn mental Pav -e
DW t Services
Other Rwer
1 Non Revenue
TOTFL MUM FLK1
1
1
M
09-20-88
AotUa!
Actual
Budget
Estimated
% Est 89
Percent of
19M
19B7
19BO
1987
To Buo3et eB
Total
$686,907
3737,835
$1.023,591
$1,012,699
-1.06%
38.54%
5102,104
S!34,507
S91,801
SIOB.!12
!7.77t
0-11%
568,862
$57.011
$73.676
S56,659
-20.38t
2.23%
$878,420
$067,359
f6B9,417
$944,631
37.22%
35.95%
$4,658
$3.924
S3.870
53,512
-7.58t
0.13%
$327.B32
$142,267
4299,643
S48B.72L
63.10%
18.60%
WO
S10,934
$10.881
$11.381
4.60%
0.43%
$2,060,833 S1,953,837 52,191,809 S2,627.715 19.M !00.00%
I
1
1
1
Taxes Payable 1989
1
Estimate 09-20-82
1
Assessed Valua Cons:
Real Estate
$65,244.053
Personal Property
---------------
$1,385,202
Total Assessed
S66,630,055
Contribution Values -
$4,002,992
Distribv Cton Values
$15,780,464
---------------
Adjusted Total Ass'd
S78,407,527
Tax Levy
1
----------------
Values
Distribution Value
S15,780464
1
Local Levy -_
$62.627:063_
Total
$78,407,527
Taxes
FunCs
Certified
---------------
General
$1,002,960
Forestry
$30,096
Debt
S74,960
---------------
Total
$1,109.016
)
)
N
Hill Rate
__________________________
Amount
0.016742
$264,197
0.013474
_____
$843,819
-
$1,108,016
$1.108,016
Revenue
Mill
Factors
Rates
0.905125
0.012196
0.027162
0.000366
0.067652
0.000912
1.ODLDDD
0.013474
.fit: ,,, I 1
Council
FROM: Public Works Foreman Ulrich
t4tEi September 29, 1988 '.
SUBJECT: PUBLIC WORKS LOADER AND SNOW EQUIPMENT :IDS
Bids were received and opened for the
purchase of a new loader equipped with
September 28, 1988. I have reviewed a
bids:
Ziegler, Inc.
Caterpillar 936E
Carlson Lake State Equipment
John Daere 624E
budgeted $115,000.00
a plow and wing on
nd evaluated the following
$ 99,086.00
$ 95,900.00
Case Power and Equipment No Bid
Carlson Equipment Company No Bid
I would like to briefly explain our method of bidding this piece
of equipment. As mentioned at an earliet Council meeting, the
specifications for the loader included the option of a total cost
bid. Total cost bidding is essentially the total owning and
operating cost of a piece of equipment. This includes the
purchase price plus the deduction for trade-in; guaranteed
maximum repair cost that the agency will incur over a five-year
or six thousand -hour period; guaranteed minimum value, which in
our specifications was an option from years 1 through 5, and
scheduled maintenance costs which include greasing engine and
transmission service.
I have attached the bid forms from these two vendors. After
review, you will find that the bids are basically self-
e:•planatory. When you reach item 7, follow the directions there,
this is how the final figure is arrived at for the total cost bid
over a 5-year period. You will see after reviewing the bids that
Ziegler bid all of the items requested. Carlson Lake State
Equipment exercised their option not to bid total cost. Our
reasoning for adding this option to our specifications is that if
we were to receive a "lemon" from any particular vendor where our
repair costs have already exceeded our guaranteed maximum repair
w'thin the time slotted, and we see these costb escalating, we
would have the option to sell any time between the first and
fifth year at the guaranteed prices. It also assists us in
budgeting for equipment repairs in the future. For at least the
first five years we don't have to look into a crystal ball and
estimate what could possibly break down or 91) wiUng.
E.
®)
E
- 2 -
Since we are looking at a long-term investment, and are trying to
speculate what the cost of operating and owning will be for this
equipment, T have done some research to find an estimated resale
value of both of these pieces of equipment. The resource I used
is entitled, The Last Bid, and is published by the International
Equipment. Exchange. What this bulletin does is give a list of
all the auctions held in North America for 1987 and what all of
the listed equipment sold for on the open market. I have done
this evaluation to substantiate some kind of resale type value 10
10 15 years from now since we probably won't exercise our
buy-back optio:: at the end of 5 years. My accumulated data is
for 18 units of each type loader from the years 1978 through
1984. These units varied in condition from almost new to very
good, goad, and fair with a variety of optional equipment.
The average price for a Caterpillar 936/930 was $37,639.00. The
average price for a John Deere 644 was $31,917.00, a difference
of $5,722.00. Since Carlson has bid a John Deere 624E, and they
are not on the market because this particular loader is :yew to
their line and, in all probability, will not be on the market
until after January 1, 1989, I had to use the John Deere 644
which is a bigger machine than the 624. We have no idea what the
price would be in the future for a 624; we can only speculate
that it would possibly be lower because of a smaller sized loader
and a lower initial cost; but history and the figures before you
show that the Caterpillar will be worth more in the future.
Initial Cost
Guaranteed Maintenance
Guaranteed Repair
Additing Resale Value
Average Cost for Owning
or 10 Years
Caterpillar
$ 99,086.OU
1,433.00
+ 1,COC.00
- 5,722.00
John Deere
$ 95,900.00
+ 1,433.00
+ 0.00
+ 5,722.00
92,931.00 103,055.00
This illustration of approximate resale value shows the
Caterpillar in the long run will cost the City less to own and
operate and will have a greater resale value at the end of our
depreciation term. These are long-term figures and are available
to everyone. As mentioned earlier, John Deere chose not to even
bid a minimum resale value in our specification. If they are not
willing to tell us what their equipment will be worth in 1
through 5 years, why should we take any unecessary chances on the
resale value of the equipment.
P-r'. Icy
Furthermore, since you all know that we are fighEing a timeta e
in order to initiate our snow removalim ortantntoratiosaussooInaour
possible, delivery date becomes veroximatepor delivery time from the
specifications we asked for an app
date of award. Carlson Lake State Equipment has a vablePthat we
delivery time as 60 to 120 days. It is very
ME not receive a loader through this vendor until the miZiegler*
February in which we have defeated all of our planning date of 45to
Inc., on the other hand, has quoted me a delivery
60 days which means we could conceivably receive our loader with
snow equipment prior to Thanksgiving •
I have contacted many municipal. users of Caterpillar . They equipment
and received very urchased ave mhigherVinitial cost piece of o
have recommended andnd p
equipment. aff
ve ea
any loaderlthatowasof
abidskedandac nstht equentlylawardedmonwerdid°have
the chance to demonstrate the Caterpillar 936 and also
den,otra624 Deere 544E
identical is a except s
exceptforlweighttto the
and
horsepower• t:y staff found the Caterpillar an easier and
smoother operating loader than the John Deere. Mzchanically, the
® Caterpillar offers options that make trouble -shooting and repair
easier a..d more efficient than tY,e John Deer:. One of the
options is a computer -assisted electrical trouble -shooting
monitor located ih a service
n the lug into hne isrcomputer and tment in ca diagnostic
technician can merely plug
print-out will bhow exactly where an electrical problem might
be. It also has simple hydraulic pressure test stations and a
folded core radiator which means if one section of the radiator
were to rupture or become punctured we would not have to replace
or repair the entire radiator. This means less down time staffn
more production. Basedo�oftthe Caterpi�'I.larn936Ey
highly reconmends the purchase
aff
REuld recommenth
COMMEND' Based upon the preceding lnurchaseon, at loader
wod that Council auorize the p
of
plus snow equipment from Ziegler, Inc. for the Pbetween General,
$99,086and•SeThis cost Funds.
.° be divided equally a
Wate
wer
MU/BAC
Attachments
�-•.—..•.�. i.. .:..
BID FORM
_ �..
'... ter. ..t •.
...
T.. .•r SIN .. ...
- .-.�.. .. ..
1.
MAKE AND MODEL OF EQUIPMENT BEING BID
�~
$
105,985.00
Make John Deere Model_ 624E
F.O.B. Mounds View , Minnesota
11
1
delivery point
2.
LESS TRADE-IN:
Make Case W-7 SIN_ 9802475
F.O.B. Mounds View , Minnesota
$
10,085.00
(-)
3.
PURCHASER PAYS ONLY THIS AMOUNT
$
95,9D0.00
4. GUARANTEED MAXIMUM REPAIR COST for five (5)
years or six thousand (6,000) hours, which-
ever occurs first. The agency pays for
only repairs needed up to the maximum which $ 3,000.00 ({)
SHALI7 NOT EXCEED
5. GUARANTEED MINIMUM VALUE at the end of each of
five (5) years or six thousand (6,000) hours
Year 1 $ No guarantee'
Year 2 $ No guars
Year 3 $ No guarantee
Year 4 $ No guarantee
Year 5 $ No guarantee (-)
6. SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE COSTS (from attached
work sheet) for five (5) or six thousand $ 3,777 00
(6,000) hours
7. TOTAL COST BID (Item #3, plus Item #4, $_
less Item #5, plus Item #6). Contract
length is five (5) years or six thousand
(6,0001 hours $ 103,677.00
DELIVERY DATE 60 - 120 _ DAYS AFTER AWARD
NAME OF BIDDER Carlson's Lake State Equipment Co.
ADDRESS 12"P0 Dupont Avenue South
Bu.nsville, MN 5�
SIGNED BY !
tr't
TITLE_GoverEogntai Sales Manager
DATE BID ACCEPTED BY
TITLE
BID FORM
1. MAKE AND MODEL OF EQUIPMENT BEING BID:
Make CATERPILLAR ' Mt del 936 '`
F.O.B. MOUNDS VIEW , Minnesota
deli•ery point
2.
LESS TRADE-IN:
Make CASE SIN 9802475
F.O.B. MOUNDS VIEW , Minnesota $
11,000.00
3.
PURCHASER PAYS ONLY THIS AMOUNT $
99,086.00
4.
GUARANTEED MAXIMUM REPAIR COST for five (5)
years or six thousand (6,000) hours, which-
ever occurs first. The agency pays for
only repairs nee6ed up to the maximum which
SHALL NOT EXCEED $
4,000.00 (+)
5.
GUARANTEED MINIMUM VALUE at the end of each of
five (5) years or six thousand (6,000) hours
Year 1 $_ 24.SDD.00 1200 Hours Maximum
Year 2 $_66 500.00 24DO Hours Maximum
Year 3 $58,000.00 3600 Hours Maximum
Year 4 $- 50,000,00 4800 Hours Maximum
Year 5 $
45,000.00 _(-)
6.
SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE COSTS (from attached
work sheet) for five (5) or six thousand
(6,000) hours $
3,064.50
7.
TOTAL COST DID (Item 13, plus Item 114, $
61,150.50
less Item #5, plus Item 56). Contra_t
--
length is five (5) years or six thousand
(6,000) hours
DELIVERY
DATE_ 45 - 60 DAYS AFTER
AWARD (IF AWARDED
NAME
OF BIDDER ZIEGLER INC. WITHIN 10 DAYS OF BID OPENING)
ADDRESS 901 Wes ti 'treet
Min Its M ne ota 35_20
SIGNED BY �J
TITLE
DATE BID ACCEPTED_
®
BY
TITLE
S�-" 1 a -
MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council
It FROM: Public Works Foreman Ulrich�/�.
DATE: September 29, 1988
SUBJECT: PUBLIC WORKS DUMP TRUCK AND SNOW EQUIPMENT BIDS
Bids were received and opej:-- Lvr the budgeted $60,000.00
Purchase of a dump truck with snow equipment on September 28,
1988. I have reviewed and evaluated the bids and they are as
follows:
1. TRUCK
Lakeland Ford $ 40,493.59
Northstar International 38,472.00
Bover Ford 40,951.59
2. EQUIPMENT (BOX AND SNOW EQUIPMENT)
MacQueen Equipment $ 21,266.00
J-Craft 18,859.00
Crysteel Truck & Equipment 18,352.00
Carlson Equipment 11,254.00
(snow equipment only)
Midland Equipment 18,055.00
(snow equipment only) 10,156.00
This bid and recommendation is not nearly as complicated as the
bid for the loader. The high and low bids on the dump truck/
chassis are approximately $2,000 apart; justifying the added
iexense sprelativelyyeasynfor 9me. Th[oughoutthe purchase fz)urFlastord Yyeerrom Lofeopa Ford a
,lions with the Ford we purchased in January of 1988. we have had
vertually no equipment failure or complaints related to this
vehicle.
The specifications for the 1988 truck were written to fit the
work the truck was expected to perform. I am very pleased with
the job that my staff did in preparing for the purchase of that
truck, taking into account that they had no previous experience
in snow plowing or heavy hauling of material.• For this reason,
we have essentially copied the prior specification and have
received the aforementioned bids. By awarding the purchase to a
Ford dealer, we would eliminate the duplication of spare parts,
filters and additional training.
My staff has familiarized themselves throughout the summer months
on the operation of this truck. I feel that due to the high
level of awareness that is needed for a plowing operation and the
frequency at which different operators could be in different dump
trucks, if we were cunsistant with one brand of truck that
essentially handled the same as they have previously experienced,
- 2 -
for operator confusion and
error•
ortunitywith the box that was installed or
ha-e less Opp purchase for it• In
we would leased equipment p which
We are also extremely pMidland Equipment, truck'
this truck and the snow remoaaain1988 model
the low bidder is a ii ment as our
this case and an q p ,commend the
Offers the same box Staff would r.
Based on the above, truck from Lakeland Ford
CATION: urchase of the ui ment £rom Midland
authorize the P and snow e4 p total cost of
Council 59 and for box 9,055.00 for a eted from the
for $40,493. the price of $l a u9. Went is bud9
Equipment The cos- of this q p
$58,54B.59.
General
MU/BAC
0
A
DATE APPROVED: 9/28/88
PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL `9� ynri r, j�
to® CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW 6s U V
RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA VVV NN 4..
2401 Hwy. 10,
The Mounds View C,_, Council was called to order by
Mayor Linke at 7:00 PM on Monday, September 12, 1988.
The Pledge of Allegiance was said.
Regular Meeting
September 12, 1988
Mounds View City Hall
Mounds View, MN 55112
---------------------
MEMBERS PRESENT: Councilmembers Hankner, Wuori, Quick,
Blanchard and Mayor Linke.
ALSO PRESENT: City Attorney Karney, Clerk/Administra-
tor Pauley and City Planner Herman.
Motion/Second: Wuori/Blanchard to approve the August
22, 1988 minutes as presented.
' S ayes 0 nays
There were no residents requests or comments from
the floor.
Bootsie Anderson, of the North Suburbar Cable Commis-
sion addressed the Couoci! concerning local access
programming, stating she felt it was better put in
the hands of a non-profit organization, as it has not
worked out with the franchise.
Mayor Linke asked if there had been any luck in get-
ting the financial documents from the cable company.
Ms. Anderson re •`.eC 'here had not, 'ut `hey do have
an idea of the b. -at fig, -es. She adde6 the aueitors
are working with the figures. She also reported several
lobbyists had been hired by the cable company, and
they are in the process of contacting the Councils of
® the cities involved, as well as for the entire system.
Mayor Linke directed Staff to prepare a resolution
and place in on the September 19 agenda for discussion,
with action to be taken at the September 26 meeting.
1. Call to
Order
2. Pledge of
Allegiance
3. Roll Call
4. Approval of
Minutes:
August 22,
1988
Motion Carried
5. Residents
Requests and
Comments from
the Floor
6. Presentation
by Ropresen-
tative of
North Subur-
ban Cable
Commission
Mounds View City Council September 12, 1988
Regular Meeting Page Tao
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mayor Linke closed the regular meeting and opened 7. Public q
the first public hearing at 7:10 PM. Hearing: t
1969 General
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reviewed the process that Fund Budget
was followed in developing the budget. He explained
the budget is limited to what the State Legislature
allows, plus whatever revenues can be generered by
the City in license fees and so forth.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley explained the purpose of
the public hearing is to receive input from the
residents on the proposed budget.
Clerk/Administrator. Pauley reviewed the revenues
planned, explaining the proposed budget would result
in a decrease from 16.7 to 13.4 in mill rare, however,
they cannot give a fixed number until they receive
final input from the County. The majority of revenue
will be from intergovernmental revenue and property
taxes.
Expenditures are planned at a 20 percent increase, or
$424,924, which includes the addition of one policeman,
one public works/maintenance person, snow plowing for
the entire City, and a vehicle and equipment replace-
ment program.
Councilmember Hankner inquired how much is currently
spent on clean-up day. Clerk/Administrator Pauley
replied it is approximately $5,000.
Councilmember Hankner stated she had had an increasing
number of people talk to her about clean-up day
and problems with cars in yards without licenses, and
old appliances, and so forth, and she suggested shift-
ing funds in the budget to enable people to get rid of
large items, though not necessarily cars.
Cleric/Administrator Pauley explained a second clean-up
day in the fall would not solve the problem, and he
noted people are not willing to pay the cost of dispos-
ing of large items, and will sometimes dump them else-
where, where they still have to be picked up by the City.
Councilmember Hankner requested that this be looked at
further.
Bill Frits, 8072 Long Lake Road, advised that he has
seen ads in weekly shopper type papers that advertise
appliance dealers who will pick up appliances from homes,
whether they work or not.
Mayor Linke closed the public hearing and reopened the
regular meeting at 7:30 PM.
Mounds view City Council
Regular Meeting
------------------------
September 12, 1988
Page Three
----------------------------------------
Mayor Links closed the regular meeting and opened the
second public hearing at 7:30 PM.
City planner Herman reviewed the proposed additions
to Chapter 40, to allow for pet stores, which had not
been covered by the Code. She read the conditions
that would apply, which are similar to those placed
on the veterinary clinic.
Mayor Linke closed the public hearing at 7:32 and
reopened the regular meeting.
Mayor Linke closed the regular meetir.9 and opened the
third public hearing at 7:32 PM.
City Planner Herman explained the conditions sat in
the conditional use permit are the same as those just
reviewed for the Code amendment in the previous
she added the conditional use permit
public hearing.
would not be allowed until the ordinance has been
approved with both readings.
Mayor Linke closed the publichearingand reopened
the regular meeting
Mayor Linke closed the regular meeting and opened
next public hearing at 7:34 PM.
City Planner Herman clarified the location of the
existing Amoco station.
Jim Phiilipi, of North Star Engineering, representing
thirAmoco Oil Company, reviewedfacilitpcandahefor reviewe addin
the site plan, coverringngparking,
a car wash to the existingarkin , stacking and signage.
Mr. Phillipi staled he had gene through the Staif
report and the only question he has concerns the re-
quirement for bloaars. He explained that with the
six minute cycle time, and the length of driveway
before cars would exit onto the roadway, they did not
feel there would be a problem with water dripping off
the cars.
Mayor Linke asked if there were any drainage problems
with the car washnext door. City Planner Herman
replied she had checked with the engineer, and there
were not.
8. Public
Hearing:
Ordinance
No. 448
9. Public
Hearing:
Consideration
of Request for
CU? by Ronald
Holt, 2540
Highway 10
10. Public
Hearing:
Consideration
of Request for
CUP for Amoco,
2155 Highway
Avenue
Councilmember Hankner asked if there would be a problem
with raising the level of rust in water in the residential
areas with the increased use of water in that area.
Mounds View City Council
Regular Meeting -----------------
ld not be, as they
Mr. Phillipi replied there Water service, and using
would only be using a 1k
18 gallons per cycle.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley added the water main that
services the area does not yet t
the addedBidre
ethere is
area until after is passes Amoco
not a build up problem there, and the 1.8 gallons per
cycle would not be a significant increase in what is
used already with all the surrounding businesses.
Mayor Linke closed the public hearing at 1:41 PM.
Pfayor Links closed the regular meeting and opened the
last public hearing at 7:41 PM.
C1erk,'Administrator Pauley explained the purpose of
having a five year plan, to assist the City in budget -
on
ing for major purchases that are not needed rermnplan.
annual basis, and he reviewed the 1988 long
Mayor Linke added
that
tfit is very
rg'eelpful to the City
to be able toeed p
lan Mayor Linke closed the public hearing and reopened the
regular meeting at 7:44 PM.
September 12, 1988
Page Four
11. Public
Hearing:
1988 Long
Term Financial
Plan
Mayor Linke read the proclamation for "Kids Day", on 12
September 24, and he explained theren intent behind bee
proclamation, encouraging
a helpful part of society.
Mayor Linke requested chat Item F be removed from the
ronsent agenda.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley read
posed consent agenda.
Blanchard/Hankner to approve the
minus Item F, and waive the reading of
Motion'
consent agenda,
the resolutions.
the items on the pro -
5 ayes 0 nays
Mayor Linke asked for a clorificaidoexplained it hadn of Item F. been
Administrator Pauley apologized
typed incorrectly, and it would actually be to approve
pay estimate No. 7 to C. W.eaouodth2rC�unty Road Icounty oad
I improvements, to be chary
project account.
M
Proclamation
Kids Day,
September 24,
1988
13. Approval of
Consent
Agenda
Motion Carried)
L
Mounds View City Council September 12, 1988
Regular Meeting Page Five
----------------------------------------------------------9---------------
Mayor Linke questioned why the retainage was only
$5,000, or about 1 percent of the total project cost.
He added when he had last looked at the pinch list
a week ago, there were many things to be completed
still.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley explained the $5,000 is
only a portion of this current statement, rather than
the total billing. He added he understood all the
punch items were taken care of, and that many items
were not the responsibility of the contractor, but
of others, such as the County. He added the City is
required to pay the billing within a certain amount
of time.
Motion/Second: Linke/Quick to approve pay estimate
No. 7 in the amount of $35,067.61 to C. W. Houle for
County Road I improvements, to be charged to the
County Road I project account, contingent upon Staff
checking with the engineer to insure the work has
been completed.
5 ayes 0 nays
Motion/Second: Blanchard/47uori to approve the first
®reading of Ordinance No. 443, amending the Municipal
Code of Mounds View by amending Chapter 40 entitled
"Zoning", and waive the reading.
5 ayes 0 nays
Potion Carrie,, I
14. First Reading
of Ordinance
No. 448
Motion Carried
Notion/Second: Quick/Wuori to adopt Resolution No. 15. Consideration
2373 apprcving the conditional use permit request of of Resolution
Ronald Holt to locate a pet store at 2548 Highway 10, No. 2373
Silver View Plaza, Plannino Case No. 250-88, and
waive the reading.
5 ayes 0 nays
Motion Carried
City Planner Herman verified the development agree- 16. Consideration
ment would also be included, along with the conditional of Resolution
use permit, and it would also list the three conditions No. 2374
stipulated in the conditional use permit, as well as
reverify the six minute cycle time for the car wash.
Mr. Phillipi asked the Council to consider eliminating
the requirement for the blower system, as he feels
that between the extended cycle time and distance to
® the roadway, there would not be a problem.
Councilmember Blanchard stated she feels the blower
is important.
Mounds View City Council
Regular Meeting
-----------------------
Mayor Links st3tad he agrees the blower is important.
Motion: Links to approve Resolution No.
00O Oi14Compa�v,
approving the development request by
2155 Highway Avenue, Planning Case No. 241-88, and
waive the reading.
The motion failed for lack of a second.
Mayor Linke asked the Council if they would like to
make another motion concerning the development request.
September 12, 1988
Page Six
No other motion was made.
Amoco Oil Company, asked why there
Chris Christofec, of the motion, or another motion made.
had been no second to
is up to the individual Council
Mayor Linke stated it
members.
There was no comment from the Council.
Attorney Karney recommended Mr. Christofec take the
d thy had
matter up with the City Planner. He addeovedeit.
not denied the request, nor had they app
d the Council was denying them the
Mr. Christofec state
opportunity ometswiad ltheirth numerousdevelopment. e
ththecity timesHweek
stated they have
after week, and have met tgettinginowhere.ofHethe
addedCode
and the City, and yet are g
he doe.,: not want to argue, yet this has been very
xplanation
expensive for them, aFd he anolsecondr an e
dhadbeen made,
from the Council as o why
There again was no response fcom the Council.
Attorney Karney stated the question could not be answered
tonight and he again advised that Staff be contacted
for an explanation.
City Planner Herman reported sheSheddrewcassketchlOf
matter with the City Attorney. applicant
the property and reviewed the request of the
for a minor subdivision. She further added the
planning Commission has recommended denial, as it is
not in conformance with the Code.
r to
NoC123 yinguthe /minor esubdivision erequest Resolution by
Richard Oman, 8205 Groveland Road, Planning Case No.
294-88, and waive the reading.
5 ayes 0 nays
Motion Failed
L,
17. Consideration
of Resolution
No. 2375
Motion Carr
Mounds View City Council
Regular Meeting
City Planner Herman presented an overhead sketch of
the property involved, and reviewed the request of
the applicant for a minor subdivision.
Motion/Second: Quick/Blanchard to approve Resolu-
tion No. 23721 approving the minor subdivision request
of Emery and Pauline Gale, 8138 Groveland Road, Plan-
ning Case No. 248-88, and waive the reading.
5 ayes 0 nays
September 12, 1988
Page Seven
------------------
18. Consideration
of Resolution
No. 2372
City Planner Herman explained this would be a reappro- 19•
val of the minor subdivision granted in July for
W. E. Rosenquist, 8380 Spring Lake Road. She explained
it was necessitated by the County's requiremtit that
the lot be replatted.
Motion/Seconds Blanchard/Quick to approve Resolution
No. 2380, reapproving the minor subdivision for W. E.
Rosenquist, 8380 Spring Lake Road, and waive the reading.
5 ayes 0 nays
Clerk/Administrator Pauley explained this request for
®the installation of a street light was directly across
from a dedicated road right-of-way, and based on
Staffs review, they would not recommend installation
a; it is too close to other lights, and the Police
have ne record of a significant number of problems to
justify this placement, on the basis of concerns for
safety.
Tom Gresher, 2508 Hillview, stated he has had nine
acts of theft or vandalism on this property since he
moved in in 1972, and he reviewed those occurarces.
He stated not all were reported to the Police, but he
feels d light there would help deter further acts of
vandalism or theft. He explained with the easement
that is there, it is easy for a person to run
either way in total darkness. He added he hae
someone come to his door in the middle of the night
oi,ce and threaten him, but it was too dark to be able
to get his license number. He added his neighbors
are in favor of the street light also.
Councilmember Hankner stated she supports this request,
as she feels lighting on Hillview would be helpful
and would disccurage vandalism.
®Barry Clark, 2504 Hillview, stated he has had problems,
and even had someone hiding in the shed in his back
yard that the Police were looking fur.
Motion CarrieL 1
Consideration
of Request to
Reapprove
Hinut Subdi-
vision, 8380
Spring Lake
Road
Motion Carried
20. Consideration
of Request for
Street Light
Installation
Mounds View City Council
Regular Meeting-----------
Motion/Second: Linke/Wuori to approve the request
for a light
9nd Woodlawntion Driven tolbelplacedwinnan
Long power pole.
advantageous location on the p
September 12, 1988
Page Eight
------------------
C ,
Motion Carried
5 ayes 0 nays
Councilmember Hankner stated they are gettthey s9 to the
Point w?.tn street light requests that they should make
sure the study that has been talked about for so long is
done now.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley replied the study b thas been
assigned to Public Works Director Minetcan bedone. He
planning must be done before th•. studyStaff must develop
stated they :rust adopt a policy, then
a plan for placement and program for installation over
period of time. He added that lights are now going
a pby petition, and a change in policy would have them
up er
placed et predetermined locations throughout the City.
Councilmember Hanker stated with more requests coming
in all the time, Staff should get started on this ,low•
Clerk/Administrator Pauley stated he had told Mr.
Minetor to get the current policy updated. it was
agreed the issue would be discussed further at
a future agenda session.
Tim Nelson, of Fverest Development, presented site
plans for Building F and reviewed the minor changes
they're r(questina freom the POD. He ecomained letedeforva-
tion work would be d the next two weeks.p
this building within
City Planner Herman clarified Road lit in
taken
in
from the pile along County
going down..
Motion/Second: Hankner/Blanchard to approve DeveloResolupment
approving an amendment to nevelopmks
Agreement
87-81 with Mounds View Business Park,
Agreement No.
Bus -
and waive the reading.
5 ayes 0 nays
the proposed changes for Build -
Mr. Nelson reviewed
ing E of the Mounds Vieu Business Park.
01
21. Consideration .I
of Resolution
yo, 2376
Motion Carr
22. Consideration
of Resolution
No. 2377
Mounds View City Council September 12, 1988
Regular Meeting Page Nine
------------------------------------- -------------------------------------
Motion/second: Quick/Wuori to adopt Resolution No.
2377, approving an amendment to Development Agreement
No. 87-81 with Mounds View Business Park, and waive
the reading.
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Councilmember Hankner asked if a sign had been placed
along County Read H2, to keep the residents informed
as to what is going on.
Mr. Nelson replied there hel been one, but it may have
been removed due to preliminary grading.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley requested that the developer
be assigned the responsibility of seeing that the sign
was taken care of. Mr. Nelson agreed to do so.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley read proposed Resolution 23. Consideration
No. 2370. of Resolution
Motion/Second: Blanchard/Quick to a,�opt Resolution No. 2370
No. 2370, in appreciation to Don Peters fer service on
the Planning Commission.
® 5 ayes
0
nays
Motion Carried
Motion/Second:
Linke/Quick to approve the appointment
24. Consideration
of Judith
Dean,
2633 Clearview Avenue, to the Planning
of Appointment
Commission
for
the term expiring December 31, 1988.
to Planning
Commission
5 ayes
0
nays
Motion Carried
Attorney Karney had no report. 25. Report of
Attorney
Councilmember Hankner reported she had received a 26, Reports of
call from Mr. Lenze, who lives on the north end of Councilmembers:
the City, who has had frequent power outages. She Councilmember
asked Staff to find out why these outages were Hankner
occurring.
Clerk/Administrator stated he would also provide the
Council with the power outage number for NSP.
Councilmember Hankner suggested that the house at
®Hillview and woodlawn Drive, which has been abandoned
for some time, be looked at for rehabilitation.
Mounds View City Council September 12, 1988
Regular Meeting Page Ten
------------------
City Planner Herman responded that she is in the pro-
cess of cLecking abandoned properties out now, and will
compile a list and check with the owners on their
intentions.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley stated that if the owner
has no plans, they will check with County authorities
and the City Attorney concerning condemnation proceed-
ings.
Attorney Karney outlined the options that are available.
'le added it is difficult to get property condemned if
it is considered habitable.
Councilmember Hankner reported fa--t traffic is increas-
ing on Quincy and apparently not stopping for the stop
signs, and she asked if it was possibly to get the speed
limit around the school reduced.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley stated he would check with
the Police Chief and City Engineer. He also advised
that a study would have to be done of existing traffic
and they could actually be required to increase the
speed, depending on what the existing traffic is doing.
Councilmember Hankner asked if trees or shrubs could
be placed between Pinewood Drive and County Road I,
along County Road I, to serve as a sight or sound
barrier. She requested the matter be looked into
further by Staff.
Councilmember Hankner reported the crosswalk at Silver
Lake Road and County Road H has not been painted in,
and she had talked to Public Works Director M:netor,
who told her it would be done. She also suggested
the placement of a stoplight at that intersection be
considered, as Sunnyside School is close by.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley replied the County has non -
programmed plans for placement of stoplights at
vrarious intersections along Silver Lake Road.
Councilmember Hankner asked if the air raid sirens
were working. Clerk/Administrator Pauley replied they
are all working now.
Councilmember Hankner expressed dissatisfaction with
errors in the New Brighton Bulletin's coverage of the
last Council meeting, specifically in stating that the
watering ban was still in effect, when it was not.
Mayor Linke explained the article was correct, in that
it was reporting the August 22 Council meeting, and the �.
ban had still be in effect at that time.
Mounds view City Council
Regular Meeting
------------------------
September 12, 1988
Page Eleven
-------------------------------------
Councilmember Hankner reported the problem with brown
water at Raymond Drive, in Everest opening the mains,
will hopefully be solved when the lines are flushed later
this month.
Councilmember Wuori asked if the problem will continue
as more development occurs.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley replied it would not. He
explained this was the result of the installation of
the loop connection from the water main on Quincy,
which involved shutting down the system and then start-
ing it up, which resulted in a surge. He added the
system would not need to be shut down again.
Councilmember Wuori reported the Planking Commission
has requested Clerk/Administrator Pauley attend their
October 5 meeting, to swear in the two new members of
the Planning Commission..
Clerk/Administrator Pauley stated the swearing in was
a formality, not a legality, and he stated that while
he would do it if directed by the Council, that would
be `_eking time from his family on a night he devotes
to them, and he would prefer not to.
® Mayor Linke stated it is normally done just be signing
the oath of office, and it can continue that way.
Councilmember Quick had no report.
Councilmember Blanchard had no report.
Mayor Linke requested a letter be sent to the School
District, thanking them on behalf of the City for their
cooperation in the installation of the stoplight at
County Road I and Quincy.
Mayor Linke reported it is being considered to install
a meter on the ramp from County Road I to 35W south,
and he does not feel it is necessary, hod he has directed
Public Works Director Minetor to get ahold of the proper
officials to tell them so.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported it is part of the
overall plan of MnDOT to address the problems further
south on 35W. He added Staff would send a letter if
the Council desires.
11
Councilmember
Wuori
Councilmember
Quick
Councilmember
Blanchard
Mayor Linke
Mounds View City Council
Regular Meeting
----------------------
Councilmember Hankner stated the policy of who will
be responsible for clearing sidewalks needs to be set
so the residents are aware of it.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley replied he has directed
Public Works Director Minetor to prepare the policies
for both snow removal and snow plow damage.
Mayor Linke clarified that the sprinkling ban is off.
September 12, 1988
Page Twelve
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported several judges
have dropped out from electrons, who need to be 27. Report of
replaced. if they are not replaced for the general Clerk/
election, it will result in major problems and delays Administrator
on election day.
Motion/Second: Second: Hankner/Quick to adopt Resolution No.
2381, appointing 1983 water meter readers, and waive
the reading.
5 ayes 0 nays
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reminded everyone the pri-
mary election is tomorrow, at the Bel Rae Ballroom,
and he reviewed registration procedures for people
who are not registered.
Mayor Linke adjourned the meeting at 9:1Q PM.
ullKsujm',filtted,
Pauley
n stra
Motion Carried
28. Adjournment
9