HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packets - 1989/06/05REVISED CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA SESSION
JUNE 5, 1989
7:00 P.M.
1, Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding Wetland
Alteration Permit for 7280 Silver Lake Road
2, Consideration Of Staff Memorandum Regarding Auto Supply
Sales in a B-2 Zone
3, Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding 12,000
Gdllon LP Tank
4, Consideration of Staff MemorandumDynamic
Resolution
s
Regarding Development Request by
5, Regarding WetlardStaff
AlterationMemorandum
Permitand
I reMoundsoView
Regarding
Business Park South
6. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding Silver View
Park Pathway Extension Project
7, Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding Silver View
Park Picnic Shelter
8, Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding Request to
Lease A Truck
9, Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding Oakwood Park
Improvement Plan
10. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding Commission
Ordinance Revisions
11. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding Woodale
Drive Extension - O'Connell to TH 10, Mounds View
Business Park South
12, Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding Approval of
Saascnal Employees
13. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding Partial
Pavment Request $1 - Lametti and Sons, SYSCO Development
- project 88-15
14. consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding Purchase of
Air Compcessoz, Asphalt Ro).ler and Trailer
ed Parks and Public Works
15. Continued Discussion of Propos
Maintenance Standards
16. Consideration of First Draft of 1990 Budget (,Iaterial to
be handed out Monday evening.)
AGENDA
JUNE 1, 1989
PAGE TWO
17. Continued Discussion of 1989 Long -Term Financial Plan
18. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding On -Sale Malt
Liquor Sales
19. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding City Signs
20. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding Knollwood
Drive Extended Right -Of -Way
21. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding Stanley
Fisher Addition, Wetland Control Structure
22. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding Marsh Park
Professional O:fices
23. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding County Road
J/85th Avenue Reconstruction
0
C
3
MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: City Planner Hren
DATE: June 1, 1989
SUBJECT: KRAUS-ANDERSON AUTO SUPPLY SALES
Representatives of Kraus -Anderson have contacted the City
regarding the possibility of allowing an auto parts retail store
(Champion Auto) in Silver View Plaza. The site is currently
zoned B-2. Recently the City Council approved a district text
amendment that removed all auto type uses from the B-2 District.
Kraus -Anderson is requesting that auto retail sales be
reconsidered as an allowable use in the B-2 District. Please
find attached a letter from Kraus -Anderson explaining tpeir
request.
At this time, Kraus -Anderson is seeking some indication from the
City Council as to the acceptability of this change. As you will
recall, the Planning Commission felt auto retail sales was an
acceptable use in the B-2 District, therefore, there is a
temporary bypass of the Planning Commission at this time. Should
the Council feel that a reconsideration is appropriate, the
applicant would proceed through the necessary process established
for a text amendment which includes a recommendation to the City
Council from the Planning Commission.
If you have any questions, please call me.
MMH/BAC
MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Public Works Foreman Ulrich
DATE: May 16, 1989
SUBJECT: REVIEW OF PROPOSED 12,000 GALLON LP TANK
It has been mentioned in the recent past that Texgas would be
drafting a proposal and drawing up plans and specifications for a
Possible 12,OOC gallon LP storage tank for the City of Mounds
View. On Wednesday, May 3, 1989, Tom Danley, our area salesman
for Texgas, along with Bob Heichert, Industrial Sale
Representative, presented me with the following proposal. It is
a very detailed specification of the plans for installation and
describing responsibilities. I will try to briefly summarize
this proposal to highlight the major points, but you are more
ely review the
of a bothlmyselfoand mask questions
the[representative from oTexgassal a Tom Danley,
who I am inviting to the Agenda Session on June Sth.
I• Quantity of the tank will be 12,000 gallons. It•is
a used tank that will be completely refurbished by Texgas,
its consultants and subcontractors to meet specifications
of a brand new tank.
2.
3
4
It was agreed in earlier discussions with Mr. Danley
that the City of Mounds View would provide the fencing for
the tank and the installation of crushed rock or
decorative amgregate for underneath and around the tank.
The third point of this proposal is the cost to the City
Of Mounds View for these services. The new equipment
which would include new fill station, a storage shed, all
the necessary safety equipment„ fire extinguishers and
complete installation of the tank comes to a sum of
$25,731.00. The tank can be leased to the City of Mounds
View for $204.00 per month or paid for with an add -on
pricing over the next five years of •0816 cents per gallon
based on a minimum of 30,OoO gallons per year used. At
the end of that five-year period we would then have the
Option to purchase a tank for an additional $950.00 or to
continue to lease the tank for $25.00 per month for the
life of the contract. Should the City deem it not
feasible to use up -front monies for a total in excess of
$25,000, there is another option available to us for this
purchase. When this tank is installed we will purchase LP
fuel for the price of .2722 cents per gallon by
transport. We can then add .0816 cents per gallon for the
tank lease plus .2212 cents per gallon for the equipment
purchase. Our net price per gallon becomes 57.5 cents per
gallon. We are currently purchasing fuel for 53 cents per
gallon and our current budgeted figures for fuel for 1989
can cope with this approximately 4-1/2 cent increase.
Mayor and City Council
May 16, 1989
Page Two
These are just a few of the highlights of the contract. I have
reviewed it paragraph by paragraph with Mr. Danley and Mr.
Heichert and I fully approve of the proposal. I strongly
with
recommend you review the proposal and familiarizeyoursessionself
it so that you may ask questions at the MayAgenda
benefits to the CThesbenefitspropane
areaa n alternate
as follows:
1. This fuel costs less per gallon than unleaded fuel.
2. An increase in performance in both squad cars and pick-up
trucks.
3. Cleaner burning fuel which results in less maintenance per
mile per vehicle and lower emissions.
There are many communities in the area that are using propane. I
am sure Mr. Danley can give you a list of those cities. Also,
there is legislation in other states to push government agencies
and large fleets to an alternative fuel and propane has been a
highly recommended one. I have a few illustrations that support
this proposal and my recommendation for its acceptance.
1. Maintenance (tune-ups) on squadcars
with
propane aredoe
at approximately 50,000 miles, adcars
ar sburning
unleaded fuel require major tune-ups at approximately
25,000 miles. We have had exhaust systems that hveand
lasted in excess of 100,000 miles on combined squad
staff cars.
2. With the City's current consumption rate of fuel, it is
possiblethat we could saveting in excessthis Of $10,000 in fuel
costs perY
3. The State of Minnesota Alternate Fuel 'User Permit could
per year per
conceivably save us as muc
vehicle on our two primary squad 80Cars� $Tha00savings is
adjusted proportionately to the gross vehicle wei.ght and
mileage per year for the rest of the fleet.
4. New underground storage tank Legislation could possibly
cost us tens of thousands of dollars to either
rehabilitatel new adetanks
The disadvantages are:
1, We would need toeducate City of Mounds View employees on
the fueling procedures,
Mayor and City Council
er� May 16, 1989
I N Page Three
2. It will take approximately 16 hours to convert vehicles.
3. An average of one mile per gallon of fuel will be lost.
These are a few of the facts that I can provide you at this time
for your consideration. Between Mr. Danley and myself, we will
be fully prepared to hopefully answer any and all questions
regarding propane as an alternate fuel for continued use for the
City of Mounds View. _
Should we decide to accept this proposal, our next consideration
is the decision of the fencing for the area of the Public Works
garage. I have received thre: bids for the work to be done which
are as follows:
Midwest Fence $22,584
Crowley Company, Inc. $19,600
Century Fence Company $15,000
Hopefully, by the June 5th Agenda Session we will have some
answers on where to fund the fence for the area.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the acceptance of the
exgas proposa or the complete installation of a 12,000 gallon
LP tank and approval of the upcoming recommendation of Public
Works Director Minetor on funding for the Public Works garage
fence.
MU/BAC
May 3, 1989
CI'^" OF MOUNDSIV'Ed
2477 Brunson
Moundsview, MN 55112
Gentlemen:
Regional Office
3101 W. 69th 51.. Suite 100
Minneapolis, M. S5435
Attached is our proposal to lease to the City of Moundsivew one
(1) 12,000 gallon tank, and sell and install a complete propane
system as described in the proposal.
As previously agreed, the City of Moundsview agrees to provide
proper fencing for the installation and will provide and install
approximately 5" of crushed rock for under and around the tank.
The delivered price of propane gas only, delivered in transport
quantities to the City of Moundsview, as of April 23, 1989, was
9.2722 per gallon. The price of propane will fluctuate up or
down with the posted market price of propane for this marketing
area.
The add -on prices for leasing the tank and purchasing the equip-
ment are contained in the proposal (Quote 8903-122, attached).
If this proposal is acceptable, please sign below.
Sincerely, c 3 L --r'
R.A. (Bob) Yeichert
Industrial Sales Representative
RX4:It
cc: (w/o Att.) 3.w.?cwell, T.R.Jil=-k, C.Zino
PROPOSAL ACCEPTED BY:
CITY OF MOUNC77I=d
BY:
Name/1:.1:t1e -ate
,..
rL.T�
`'r' )J-
' J✓^�=.n ram„". ^%
r1G(C 'v�, � '' '. �.�...�. ..
�.� �i..r
April 25, 1989
Quote 5 8903-122
City of Moundsview
2466 Bronson
moundsview, M. 55112
Suburban Propane
One Suburban Plaza
.40 Route 10 West
P.O. Box Z06
Whippany' V1 07931.02%
:01.M-5300
Gentlemen:
At the request of Bob Heichert Representative from suburban
of moundsew, we ar�e and for The C
ourPropane
quotation fort' the propane storage system.sed to submit
SISTER DESIGN DATA
Motor Fuel - 15 Vehicles
30,000 Gallons per year
BTU per gallon propane - 91,500
BTU per cubic foot Propane - 2,516
Specific gravity propane - 1.52
To provide a propane system based on the above design data, we
offer the following:
PROPANE STORAGE TANK
One 121000 gallon water capacity used propane storage tank built
in accordance with the Asm-z code for unfired _rnessure vessels,
including National Board :cumber.
The tank will be fitted with magnetic liquid level gauge,
indicating dial the=nometer, 0 to 300 PSI pressure gauge, 85%
outage gauge, suitable �excesss flow valves and croximatelnecessary
liquid and va?or shutoff valves. The tank is ap- ewith two
46
Feet long by 7' in diameter. The tank will be equipped
sers and
250 Psi relief valves complete
tank. w lsalso be hydrostat-, even foot vent. �call'
approved weather caps.
tested prior to placing into ser✓ce.
The tonic can be leased for 5201.00/uo. or paid !or with add-cn-
-L1C'.^.g p'Jer:� :Je yeas a: 5.0816/ga _Tan, �252d On a-m_n_'IG:.
Z:1CnSi yr^9 ;leZLl'! 1:••�'IL"l
n-uaT_ -v1c =u: c: 30,000 g -- a alan
;_
no- -eac e;, ycu w::: =e pilled foL the add-cn-pr= e -eL g
f-_ yal_ not
0
t�
K
1:ht the end of the (5) year lease period the customer will have
e option to purchase the tank for an additional $950.00 or
continue leasing at 525.00/mo. for the life of the contract.
DISPENSING SYSTEM
A new dispensing system will be provided. This will provide
improved filling efficiency.
CONCRETE PIERS
concrete piers will be provided to support the propane storage
tank(s). The concrete piers will conform to the shape of the
storage tank and will support the tank approximately four feet
above grade and approximately five feet below grade.
PIPING
All the ac sa: piping far both lim:id and vapor line,- and this
includes all schedule 80 pipe and forged steel fittings w4ll be
furnished. Piping will be provided from the transport unloading
station to the tank.
One lot of pipe supports required to support above ground piping
wherever necessary will be furnished.
RANSPORT UNLOADING STATION
One transport unloading station fabricated in accordance with the
latest NF?A Pamphlet 458 specifications for vapor return for
liquid fill lines will be provided. The unloading station will
consist of 2" indicating flow valve with back check, 2" strainer
and acme adapters with raincaps and chains. The vapor equalizer
line will consist of a 1-1/4" excess flow valve, 1-1/4" shutoff
valve and Acme hose adapters with raincaps and chains.
FIRE PREVENTION
(2) 20 lb. dry chemical fire extinguisher(s) will be provided
for the )ropane storage tank area, the transport unloading area
and other areas as required by NF?A pamphlet 458.
One lot of ":io Smoking" signs and "Special Instructions" signs
will be provided.
Cne lot c= -
_ _d" signs mounting on the propane
storage t_:k w"' a:so 'e ^rcvidec.
MA
2
PAINTING sandblasted and the entire
The tank will be completely
installation will be painted and color coded. The storage tank
will be primed and finished painted WHITE, All liquid lines
will be ORANGE and all high pressur indicated pas ltoetheLdirectioins wll beonnof
All Piping will be adequately
flow and to the contents of the pining.
ENGINEERING SERVICES, SHOP DRAWINGS AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA
our quoted price includes all of the necessary si?Prgndrawingsg
drawings such as plot plan, foundationpertinent drawing,
required for the
:Tiring diagrams and other The drawings are usually
installation of the equipment.
available in 2 to 4 weeks upon receipt of a formal purchase
order.
OPERATING INSTRUCTIONS
A booklet containing operating, installation, maintenance and
ecessry
start up instrueoandw a lcopyf of 1 FPA Pamphlet urnshed. All Oft458 nwill abe
drawings required
included.
At the time of start uP of the plant a training session will be
conducted to train all operating personnel on the sa-e operation
of the system.
START UP AND ADJUST`RIT
suburban Procane will furnish a field supervisor to supervise the
installation of the entire system and to provide start up and
installation has been completed.
adjustment after the
CRANE SERVICE
A crane will be provided to remove the propane storage tank from
the flatbed track and install it on the concrete Piers• This is
Lon that
location crane
flatbed truck a
n enter
on the he of eproposedstorage
the e o .
tank installation under their own power.
TESTING
All Pi.^.S will be ?•'essu_•e tes_e_ ?r.or to Putt_ 4 -=e spat=_
PRICES IZTD T`-MS OF S? '
^me.^.:'less Tan.<i
p Terms 25% with purchase order.
1 ; 30% upon delivery of
propane storage tank.
35% upon completion of the
installation.
in upon start up, but not
later than 30 days
after the installation
has been completed.
CONDITIONS
our proposal remains fi=m for a period of 30 days.
If our proposal is not accepted within 30 days, pricing of the -
propane storage tank and related equipment are subject to
escalation.
This quote innlucds oven .;`.cp i_n 'or rat -as only. if union Labor
Rates are to be used, this quote is invalid and new pricing must
be determined.
Driveways and landscaping are not figured into the above quoted
price.
If painting of the complete installation cannot be perfc-med at
the time of the installation due to weather conditions, the
rcustomer may elect to withhold from the final payment an amount
equal to the best quoted price by an acceptable local contractor.
We cannot be responsible for any shut down which may be incurred
due to the tying in of the propane system to the existing system.
The quoted price does not include any below ground obstructions
which may be encountered during excavation for the tank piers or
piping. These obstructions may include, but not be limited to;
ledge, foundation, boulders too large to be removed with
available equipment, etc.
The offer footings are based on 4000 2SF soil bearing. Any soil
conditions less than this, the piers will be constructed at an
additional cost.
During excavation any water problems that cannot be handled by
ordinary pumping methods will be billed to t^e customer at an
additional cost.
nC of used =an.ks 13 subjec: to a/a_laa--_ _ c_ =an CS in ou:
stJc:<. a : t e =_me oc acee?ta .ce J- '.a3 . - OCSa a '15Ed taC:.{
is nct zvzi-a3 �, a _e.a cuotz=_cn w -.ave -J Je su mi==e..
d w_=
1C i.^.0 r.+r •9:=•'•'-_ 3 d-erg.^.t a°.-.e used :an.< or a new
G
4
TAXES
The above price does not include any applicable taxes or tariffs.
DELIVERY
The above components can be delivered and installed in
approximately 4 to L weeks upon receipt of formal purchase order.
FREIGHT
Freight is included in "Price and Terms of Sale" quote.
W Y1ZANTIES
Suburban Propane will honor all warranties as established by the
manufacturers of the various pieces of equipment.
OPTIONS
We can also sell the equipment less tank with an add on price per
gallon for a 5 year period for 5.2212 per gallon. This is based
on a minimum throughput of 30,000 gal/yr. or 150,000 gallons
total at which time ownersnip of the equipment will be assigned
to you. T_f the yearly minimum is not reached, you will be billed
for the add on price per gallon for gallons not consumed.
CUSTOMER RESPONSIBILITIES
In order for us to submit a proposal of this type there are a few
customer responsibilities which we outlined as follows:
1. Have sufficient level land available to complete the
installation of the propane storage facility.•
2. Notify the company's insurance carrier of the propane
installation.
3. obtain all of the necessary State and Local permits for
the installation and storage of the fuel.
4. Provide lighting of the area if required.
5. if c
!ire protection other than that ucted above is
reciired by the governing nsurar..ce Ca___e_, local,
town or city ardinance, this :rust he me: bv t e
Customer.
5. The site must be accessible to our trucks under tier
cw^ Ccwe=.
8• The customer will be responsible for all electrical
work necessary for the completion of the above work.
Please sign and return one copy of this quote to my attention so
we may proceed with ordering and scheduling your installation.
We thank you for the opportunity of allowing us to prepare this
proposal. If you have any questions or require additional
information, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Sincerely,
Charles A. Zino
Supervisor
Propane Systems Engineering
("''.AZ/emp
;::40uads r_ew
0 MEMORANDUM
Memo To :Mayor and City Council Members
From :Ric Minetor, Director of Publig Works/City Engineer
Date :June 1, 1989 i
Subject :Security Fence for the Public Works Shop
Mike has prepared a memo regarding the desirability of a larger
propane tank for our propane fueling station. A requirement of
this will be fencing of the fueling station. In reviewing the
needs of fencing, staff agreed that fencing of the entire shops
area would b° beneficial and is desirable. We have proposed this
fencing in the 1990 budget. However, the fencing for the tank
would need to be done after it is installed. It appears to be
expedient and less costly to fence the entire are at this time
Vnrcne Fnnnt.... F a tank
---•-•••.- . itvri ¢il'_ il1t..__,_
V Iiyllly r-hu fence at a larar
date.
The concern is the source of funds as this is not currently
budgeted. The bids on the roof work at City Hall were
significantly under budget and there is $5,000 available fro.a
this account. Since the shop is utilized by the Water and Sewer
departments, it seems appropriate for these departments to share
in the cost of the fence. I feel that some of the system
improvements in the water and sewer departments could be deferred
to allow $5,000 expenditure from each of these areas toward the
fence costs. The bid price of the fence is $15,000 (see attached
memo). Since we are updating the Water and Sewer Capital
Improvement Plan, the deferred work would be programmed into
future projects in the updated plan.
I recommend that a contract for fencing the Public Works Shop
area be awarded to Century fence in the amount of their bid of
$15,000 and the costs be charged equally to accounts 1.00-4190-
702, 700-4122-515, and 730-4122-515.
W
MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: City Planner Hren
DATE: June 1, 1989
46-Y
SUBJECT: DYNAMIC DESIGNERS WETLANDS ALTERATION PERMIT
Please find attached a draft copy of the proposed resolution
that was unanimously approved by the Planning Commission for the
wetlands alteration permit for the Dynamic Designers proposal.
Subsequent to the Planning Commission meeting, the City Engineer
had additional concerns on the drainage issue. At this time the
applicant is gathering more information for review by the City
Engineer. It is anticipated that this information will be
available for your review at your Agenda Session on June 6.
if you. have _ny.. .ueeti_o.n.e.. .,Y_2a5E cCel LYCC tU Cell
me.
MMH/BAC
RESOLUTION NO. 2493
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTS OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION APPROVING A WETLAND ALTERATION PERMIT m
PLAN TO CONSTRUCT A FOURPLEX IN THE
WETLAND, 7656/7660 WOODLAWN DRIVE BUFFED,ZONE ZONANDE OF A
PLANNING CASE No. 138-83
Walters, Dynamic Designers has submitted wetland alteration permit to construct
zone (plans dated April 28 d a request for a
received May , 1989 a fay 10 x in the buffer
Y 17, 1989); and revised May 10, 1989 and
minimumWl CAS' the proposed glplan meets ,
area and varei ee , _ _
requirements; andiung ordinance
the wee`lHnd�s' Barr Engineering has reviewed and
significant adverse act and
soufound that the commented on
Proposal does noe have a
P on the wetland; and
WHEREAS, the Mounds View City Council requires
a permit
from Rice Creek Watershed District for wetland alteration.
the CitNOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the
y Of Mounds View approves the city Contingent upon: Council of
wetland alteration permit
1• The trash
site "�°n is specifically indicated
plan. it is understood that the trash wiollthe
2. There located between the principal building
3• Commentsll be ofthenO outdoor storage. 4
and the garage.
4. Comments of the Cltineer.
5• Comments of the City Attorney.
6• Construction Of Y Forester.
the wetland Outletbconsistentaffled rwith tRice Creek
Watershed District structure at
7• Rice Creek WatershedeDistrict pe
rmit.
ATTEST: of J
Adopted t11s 12th dayPeune, 1999.
(SEAL) •Kayo-
ClAdminlstrator
4
r,
M
G
MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: City Planner Hren
DATE: June 1, 1989
46414.005
SUBJECT: MOUNDS VIEW BUSINESS PARK SOUTH WETLANDS ALTERATION
PERMIT
Please find attached a draft copy of the proposed resolution
regarding the Mounds View Business Park South wetlands alteration
permit request. I will point out that this is a draft copy
prepared oy Staff and is currently under the review of the City
Attorney and Barr Engineering. It is expected that should there
be anv mainr chin--- to th-
^^tif •-o-- = preY�Jcd resolution you will hp
at your Agenda Session on June 6. In the meantime, if
you have any questions or concerns please feel free to call me.
MMH/BP.0
RESOLUTION NO. 2492
�y CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
i s COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION APPROVING A WETLAND ALTERATION PERMIT FOR
EVEREST DEVELOPMENT, MOUNDS VIEW BUSINESS PARK SOUTH
t has requested
WHEREAS, the Develope-, Everest Developmen,
rainwork
approval of a wetland alteration Prosalmittfora
MoundstViewdBusiness
associated with the development pro
p
Park South; and
WHEREAS, the City Council, Planning Commissio.^., City Staff,
En ineering Consultant have reviewed this
and the City s g
development request; and
WHEREAS, this ucwelo^I---
of Chapters 48 and 49A because
zoning district; and
WHEPLAS, Chapter 48.05,
land proposed to be subdivided
district to have the following:
must conform to the requirements
this development is in a wetland
Subd. 5 A, B and C requires all
and lying within a wetland zoning
r
� A. Minimum lot size - 20,000 square feet
B. Minimum lot width - 125 feet as measured at the
building setback line
C. All structures shall be setback at least 100 feet
from the wetland; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has seen fit to develop these
requirements to regulate the wetland because the Council has
found the following:
Chapter 48.01, Subd. 2
The Council finds that wetlands within the City, as part
of the ecosystem, are critical to the present and future
health, safety and general welfare of the land, animals,
and people within the City, as well as within
potthe
Rice
Creek Watershed District; that existing
ial
devel.opment within the City and Rice Creek Waters problems
District poses increasing ecological
and economic
despoiling,
and demands, having the effect of potentieliminally
es
or
polluting, accelerating the aging,
negatively and irretrievably altering both the wetlands
and their functions (and the processes associated
c^nserved and maintained, constitute
therewith) which, rf
rmpertant phvsical, educational, ecological, ae5thatre,
ts
or
recreational Landae economicommunity andethefRice�Creek9Watershedand re
District; and
RESOLUTION NO. 2492
PAGE TWO
WHEREAS, the City Council has found the intent of Chapter
48 to be the following:
Chapter 48.01, Subd. 2A
To preserve wetlands in as natural a state as possible to
serve as natural retention and detention areas for surface
waters; to regulate the use of areas adjacent to the
wetlands in order to protnct the natural function of the
wetlands; to provide for the protection, preservation,
proper maintenance and use of wetland zoning districts; to
minimize the disturbance to them and to prevent damage
from excessive sedimentation, eutrophication, or
pollution; to prevent loss of beneficial aquatic
organisms, wildlife, and vegetation of the habitats of the
same; to provide for the protection of fresh water
supplies from the danger of drought, overdraft, pollution,
or mismanagement; to secure safety from flcods; to reduce
the financial burdens imposed upon the community through
rescue and relief efforts occasioned by the occupancy or
use of areas subject to periodic flooding; to prevent loss
of life, property damage, and the losses and risks
associated with flood conditions; to reduce the financial
burdens imposed upon the community through correction of 1
erosion problems that, with proper foresight, could be
avoided; to avoid the financial burden of the need for the
community to reclaim its water quality; and to preserve
the location, character and extent of natural drainage
courses; and
WHEREAS, the developer has requested a wetlands alteration
permit to work within the 100 foot setback requirement because tie
claims exceptional circumstances apply to the property which do
not apply generally to other properties; and
WHEREAS, in the granting of a wetland alteration
permit, the City Council must find the following, 40.26, Subd. D:
(1) Exceptional or extraordinary circumstances apply to
the properties which do not apply generally to other
properties in the same zone or vicinity and result
from lot size or shape, topography or other
circumstances over which the owners of the property,
since enactment of this Code, have no control.
(2) The literal interpretation of the provisions of this
Code would deprive the applicant of rights commonly
enjoyed by other properties in the same district under
the terms of this Code. (JVj
RESOLUTION No. 2492
PAGE THREE
(3) That the special conditions or circumstances do not
result from the actions of the applicant.
(4) That granting the wetland alteration permit requested
will not confer on the applicant any special privilege
that is denied by this Code to owners of other lands,
structures or buildings in the same district.
(5) That the wetland alteration permit requested is the
minimum request which would alleviate the hardship.
Economic conditions alone shall not be considered a
hardship.
(6) The wetland alteration permit would not be materially
detrimental to the purpose of this Code, or to other
property in the same zone.
(7) The requested wetland -alteration permit will not
impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent
property, or substantially increase the congestion of
the public streets, or increase the danger of fire or
endanger the public safety, or substantially diminish
or impair property values within the neighborhood.
The Board of Adjustment and Appeals may impose such
j restrictions and conditions upon the premises
benefitted by a variance as may be necessary to comply
with the standards established by this Code, or to
reduce or minimize the effect of such variance upon
other properties in the neighborhood, and to better
carry out the intent of the variance; and
WHEREAS, the City Council acknowledges that the proposed
extension of Woodale Drive will be located within the wetland and
buffer because of the health, safety and welfare of the users of
the site and those persons driving on the road; and
WHEMAS, the City Council finds that this property does
have exceptional circumstances which apply to this property which
does not apply generally to other properties in the same zone or
vicinity; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the special
conditions do not result from the actions of the applicant; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds the wetland alteration
permit request is the minimum wetland alteration permit which
would alleviate the hardship; and
WHEREAS, the City's Consulting Engineers have reviewed the
wetland alteration permit application and evaluated it based on
' Chapter 48.06, Subdivision 3; and
RESOLUTION NO. 2492
PAGE FOUR
WHEREAS, it has been determined that the proposed
excavation and filling will not cause the total natural flood
storage capacity of the wetland to faLl below the projected
volume that the wetland would hold following a six-inch rainfall
in 24 hours over the whole developer wetland drainage district;
and
WHEREAS, it has been determined that the proposed filling
will not cause the total natural phosphorus stripping capacity of
the wetland to fall below the phosphorus production of the
wetland drainage district for its projected development; and
WHEREAS, it has been proposed that all fill used will be
free of chemical pollutants and organic waste; and
.Al' it has been determiner? that th-
10used filling
l to implemented so as to minimize the impact and vegetation;
WHEAS, it has been detrminetht the Propose
will belocated to minimize thee
eimpact onavegetation; anddredging
WHEREAS, it has been determined that the proposed dredging
will not significantly alter the wetland's water flow
characteristics; and
WHEREAS, it has been recognized that the proposed dredging
is the minimum required to achieve this development; and
WHEREAS, it is recognized that the proposed dredging will
not take place in breeding or spawning seasons of wildlife; and
WHEREAS, it has been determined that organic waste will
not be discharged directly into the wetland; and
WHEREAS, it has been determined that the storm water
run-off from the proposed development will be substantially free
Of silt, debris and chemical pollutants and will not disturb
vegetation; and
WHEREAS, it has been determined that the proposed
development will not cause storm water run-off from the wetland
to take place at a rate which would exceed the natural rate of
run-off; and
WHEREAS, it has been determined that the proposed
development will not cause the total natural phosphorus stripping
capacity of the wetland to fall below the projected phosphorus
production Lrom the whole developed wetland watershed; and
RESOLUTION NO. 2492
PAGE FIVE
WHEREAS, it is recognized that the lowest floor elevation
will be at least two feet above the elevation of the adjacent
wetland boundary.
WHEREAS, Everest Development will construct a business
park, a roadway extension, a walking trail, a Type 4 wetland, and
two (2) storm water runoff detention basins; and
WHEREAS, approximately two (2) acres of the business park
are located within the buffer zone of the 1-3 Wetland Zoning
District; and
WHEREAS, construction activities associated with the
Business Park reportedly will impact 0.006 acres of the wetland;
and
WHEREAS, the extension of Woodale Drive involves the
excavation of wetland soil and placement of fill into the 1-3
wetland; and
WHEREAS, approximately 0.1 acres of wetland and 2 to 3
acres of upland buffer will be impacted by the extension to
Woodale Drive; and
WHEREAS, the walking trail is located within the wetland
and construction of the trail will require placement of fill over
1.3 acres of wetland on the school property; and
WHEREAS, the trail is constructed with the intent of
providing the citizens of Mounds View with a low impact access to
the 1-3 wetland for educational, aesthetic and recreational
purposes; and
WHEREAS, construction of a Type 4 deep marsh wetland is
also associated with the Mounds View Business Park development.
The Type 4 Wetland will be located within the existing 1-3
Wetland, and will replace approximately two (2) acres of existing
Type 2 wet meadow and Type 6 shrub swamp. The Type 4 wetland
will be constructed with the intent of increasing the diversity
of habitat within the 1-3 Wetland; and
WHEREAS, two (2) storm water runoff detention basins will
be constructed as part of the development. The detention basins
are located on uplands and are designed to provide storm water
storage and water quality treatment. The discharge from the
largest detention basin is directed to the wetland the discharge
from the smaller detention basin is directed to Rice Creek; and
WHEREAS, two (2) wetland alteration permits are required
as a result of the placement of structures within the wetland
buffer zone, placement of fill in the wetland, and excavation of
material from the wetland; and
RESOLUTION N0. 2492
PAGE SIX
WHEREAS, the results from Barr Engineering's review of the
development proposal. indicates that the develcpment
Proposal is
in compliance with the permit requirements; and
WHEREAS, the development includes several features which
may be considered net, benefits with respect to
These benefits include the construction of a
the wetland for Public interests.
increased d for tducati diversity d recreational use, creation
trail within
wetland (Type 4 wetland) within rthe iexisting
and extension of Woodale Drive to State Highway 10.
the City0Of MoundFO---w BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
ermit
requests to perform work withinsthee100tlaot alteration
the wetland. foot buffer and within
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council a
wetland alteration permits to allow for working within a wetland
zoning district contingent u approves the
upon the following:
1) The developer confirm in writing that there will not
by any disposal of dredged material within the wetland
located at the site.
2) The developer submit a plan illustrating the
boundaries of the work areas and that these
boundaries
be the minimum necessary to complete the proposed
work.
3) The developer place silt fences and hay bales as
erosion control measures along all boundaries of the
existing wetland and the work area.
4) The developer present the City with a m
and schedule for the aintenance plan
on -site storm water ponds.
5) The storm water detention basins shall be constructed
prior to general site grading and maintained
immediately following completion of the development.
S) The limits of construction shall be specified and
staked in the wetland zoning district.
7) A specific construction schedule shall be specified.
Adopted tliis 12th day of June, 1989.
ATTEST:
(SEAL) Mayor W
Clerk -Administrator
4`
H
MEMO TO: MAYOR AND COUNCILMEMBERS
FROM: MARY SAARION, DIRECTOR
PARKS, RECREATION AND FORESTRY
DATE: JUNE 1, 1989
SUBJECT: SILVER VIEW PARK PATHWAY EXTENSION PROJECT
The materials cost of the pathway extension has been budgeted in 1989. It was originally
planned that City staff would perform the pathway installation. However, the heavy
schedule of Public Works does not allow timely installation of this pathway (early sumer)
as indicated to the residents. Thcrefore, staff has requested bids on this project. Three
bids were received. Those bids are attached. I have performed reference checks on c ch
and I am prepared to discuss each proposal at the agenda meeting.
It has also been recommended and staff agrees that installation of a large culvert at the
west side storm water sewer outlet would be a wise investment. This culvert would allow
park m latensace vehicles [o dnve on the tis and uvel die ditch for greater efticien[ trail
maintenance. The cost of the two culvert options are:
Option #1 - 48" culvert
Option #2 - Metal arch
$ 6,500.00
$13,000.00
Option #3 - Inexpensive pedestrian bridge which
would barely allow a small pick-up.
$20,000 - 25,000.00
The size and style of the second culvert option has been recommended by City Engineer
Minetor. It will be large enough to handle the five year storm.
The budget has $3,157.00 for materials cost for the basic trail extension which will
basically cover the materials costs of all the proposals (except the asphalt option).
The additional options of labor for contracting the work and the cost of installation and
purchase of a culvert is additional unbudgeted expenses that could be funded with monies
from the Park Improvement Fund.
Staff will be in attendance at the agenda meeting to discuss this park project and seek
direction from the council as to how this project should proceed.
MS/SL
Attachment
BB) SUMMARY SHE
MIDWEST LANDSCAPING
TOTAL ...... $6,077.00
Labor ...... $2,609.00
Materials .. 3,468,00
References: City of Maple Grove
City of Coon Rapids
DARRELL'S CONTRACTING. INC.
Option #1 Crushed limestone with mat
$9,250.00
Option #2 Crushed asphalt and concrete without mat
$5,165.00
Option #3 Crushed asphalt and concrete base and blacktop
$12,750.00
References: City of Blaine
Buzzell Masonry
GREENS FOREVER LANDSCAPING (Does not have equipment to install culvert)
TOTAL ..... $4,946.00
Labor ..... $1,782.00 (additional 5200.00 packing - has never packed before)
Materials.. 3,164.00
U
GREENS FORE4ER LANLSCAPINU
Jav Clemens
755-5ti'LR
Name: dr
Phone:
r�2.T/0�.
MATERIAL:
Timber ...........................
Spikes. f ch:•
Edging ...........................
vStakes2.2
.f
Plants & Shrubs.......... / . ..
Trees.. .. .......... • .
,ed GJo?s X ..... ....
Black Dirt .......................
Other .................
Total Material
+ 6% Sales 'ra%
LABOR:
General Labor ...................
Sod Labor ..............
Total Labor
E JrFl�.60
lf{93s-
TOTAL: ................................
s .
THANK YOU
r wiina
'X f�
ywt
MIDWUT
IAnDMPInG
PROPOSAL:
Sheet No.: 1 of 1
Date: 5/11/69
Proposal Submitted To: I Work To Be Performed At: I
City of Mounds View
2401 Highway 10
Mounds View, MN 55112
Attn: Mary Saarian
Silverviev Park
Trail Connection
We hereby propose to furnish all the materials and perform all the labor necessary for the completion of:
Excavate 725' x 8' x 411 2.009.00
Install GTF 200 Geotextile Fabric o08,00
Install 3/16 minus Limestone 4" Deep 2,560.00
Pack Limestone 600.00
$6,077.00
All material is guaranteed to be uspecified•and the above work to be performed in xw d,.g�{'iq wi,,(( thedrawingsaudspecirwatioos
submitted, and completed in amlbitantill workmanlike manner forthesum of -1-1— Dalian.
roth payment to be made as meows: Payment in full due in 30 days from sub tan iat ompjg5ton. A
2 service char¢Qe will be as8$essed or �the 31st dA9 and egch month [hereafter uptit aid.
Any al[eratlona nr OerlaRun frrsm abere Ypeelflcations imrotiving extra cueu. wdf be executer) only upon written uraen. any x'dl p
become an ears charge over and above the tstimnte. All agreements contingent upon strikes, accidents or dela ,; beyond our
control. Owner ro carry fire, tornado, and other necessary insurance. upon above work. Workmen'. Compensation and Public
Liability Insurance on above work to be taken out by ylidwest Landscaping. �/A
Respertfullysubmltted �--'''-t^•j"A 'Nr
\'ute • Thu proposal maybe withdrawn by us dnot accepted within L20 dare.
..........................................................................................
Warrant illdwiYi LanilM'aplaa N'III rl'plal'P nlll'1' anV 1 M1•v ur rhll;h That fall] lu live !noon• crux from dish• rl'Vbnuur Vnntdr�l:
pion), Line hw•n pruprdc manu:um.l, lice hn, Irl, hn•n rvi onrd oolio, that year. the lur. ba, nm hrrn r:unrd bum n1,rr:.,o
di,ea,�•. and the snouts) hue he n pmd according r•r wrnl..
ACCEPTAYCE OF PROPOSAL
The aboc„pnc-, rprrdicalon, end runditmrt,arp,unrfmvrgand Jreyerrhv:u•repu'd. l'nn ari-atchuriz,•d 'lush-
,p..al••dI':pSI-:It t,It ':"mid'."nYthnrd ahulr.Inm:-nWnd en .Iddmimul ecru e'-•har.r .,I= u.r nunuh.m do u.-•q;.
habinn• min' h••,'screed d pa,,m ,t 1, inn made ss .pr,•:11.1,
lia'.. .Swn,wr-
0 /nc2 ,1/BOYJ 0'o
.� • �9a so,.�c
#01
- p, /3GS.d'J
g,1,i,,,7 7S vo
S/aroo (,Y.
7; o-D P, lA,
�y MEMO TO: MAYOR AND COUNCILMEMBERS
FROM: MARY SAARION, DIRECTOR
PARKS, RECREATION AND FORESTRY
DATE: MAY 31, 1989
SUBJECT: SILVER VIEW PARK PICNIC SHELTER
The Mounds View Lion's Club has provided plans of the picnic shelter
which is currently out for price quotes. Should the bid be within the
acceptable price range of the Lion's Club, the picnic shelter committee
would like to begin construction as soon as possible. For this reason, staff
wishes to have Council review this preliminary plan and consider its
approval. I believe that a Lion's Club member will be present to answer
questions.
M'S/SL
a
(-bA MEMO TO: MAYOR AND COUNCILMEMBERS
FROM: MARY SAARION, DIRECTOR
PARKS, RECREATION AND FORESTRY
DATE: MAY 31, 1989
SUBJECT: REQUEST TO LEASE A TRUCK
In past years, seasonal summer workers have used the two Chevy Luv trucks, green
van and Suburban. Because of dangerous conditiors, the green van and Chevy Luv
were sold to a junkyard. This year, there is an additional two parks groundskeepers:
We are seeing a need for one more truck in order to equipment them for efficiency.
Currently, the Luv and Suburban (which holds the water tank) are traded each day at
noon. During the mornLngs, Pat Salo, 'Forestry Assistant, uses it for watering newly
Planted trees and flowers. During the afternoon, she uses the Luv to haul woodchips.
When not used by Pat, the groundskeepers use these two vehicles to carry the
equipment for daily athletic field lining.
The additional truck would be used for trash removal runs and also to haul equipment
such as weed eaters, hand mowers, and materials such as dirt, ag-lime, chips and
other necessities.
City staff has looked into several options for obtaining a truck:
Ootion #1 - Lem, Several car dealerships have been contacted to inquire
about leasing. It was found that a one year minimum is required. We only need a
truck for three months, June through August.
OPtion #2 - Rentine. Truck rentals could not be found at dealerships
()Orion #3 - Purr-h3sine an�linQ_ Two trucks have been checked by Public
Works Mechanic Richard Schmidlin. Both were unapproved because of leaking seals
and rusted bed and one had a stick transmission. The idea for this option is to buy a
safe, but cheap truck for approximately $Soo - $800 for summer use intending to sell
it for a minimal loss of about $200 - $300. The trick would be to find a cheap truck
requiring little or no maintenance.
The public works staff is leary of this option because of the past experience that old
used trucks usually require significant maintenance. Considering this risk, repairs
would need to be performed elsewhere during weekend or evening hours, funded
through the Rec Activity Fund.
Memo to Council
May 31, 1989
Page two
Option #4 - Lease Foreman Ulrich's Truck. Public Works Foreman Uhich has offered
the use of his personal truck to the city for use during June through August. The cost
would be $250 phis insurance coverage. The truck is in sound mechanical running
order. It is an old truck which is accustomed to hauling equipment and materials. A
ropy of an example of a lease is attached as prepared by Finance Director Brager.
Option #5 - Purchase vehicle from Army Surplus. Four vehicles are available at the
Surplus Distribution Center. Prices are:
One 1977 Chevrolet for $400 - needs some mechanical work (tune-up, replace
plugs).
Two 1978 Dodge vehicles, $300 each - need some mechanical work (tune-up,
replace plugs).
One vehicle for $1,200 - is in good condition.
Trucks purchased from this agency must be kept for a minimum of one and one-half
years unless permission is given to junk it after heavy use.
Staff is looking for Council's direction on this issue. Recreation Activity Fimds is an
idea of funding to be used for whatever option is considered. Needless to say, the
least expensive option would b! important to the Parks and Recreation Department
since this is not a budgeted item.
MS/SL
Attachment
Owl
MEMO T0:
MAYOR AND COUNCILMEMBERS��
FROM:
PARKS, RECREATION AND FORESTRY
DATE: MAY 31, 1989
SUBJECT: OAKwOOD PARK IMPROVEMENT PLAN
The Parks and Recreation Commission has been wor_kin
Park Improvement plan. Ideas for this plan originated from residents who were
invited to a g on ideas for an Oakwood
meeting for their input on needs at Oakwood Park. A survey was sent to
surrounding residents requesting ideas for Oakwood Park improvemen s.
The commission has spent the last two meetin
needs for park improvements at O 8s discuss-
cost of a 1 Oakwood. Here is a list approximate prices, site plans and
Will be invited to tOakJunewoo 22 pard Park. k his plan will be open flreview cost and total
and Recreation Commission mee;by residents who
The Parks and with
a tion Commission proposes to fund these Oakwood u;fk
improvements with a portion of the S5Q 000 park Dedication Fees received
Iron; cj';C3
Corp. in 1989
IMPROVEMENT
Site preparation
APPROXIMATE
—�
COST
Play equipment
Bleachers (3
$ 8,000.00
tier)
Backstop
11,00o.00
Two (2) players benches
Ag•lime infield
334.00
2,000.00
Sand volleyball
Water fountain court
500.00
2,000.00
Path re alignme
Two (2) picnic tables
tables
1,500.00
1
,000,001,000.00
One (1) picnic grill
Four (4) horseshoe
700.00
courts
180.00
500.00
The site
$28 .60
8radmg Plans will be at the meeting for review. The proposed 1
adequate drainage using a crowning affect on the infield. SEH provided an alternate
Plan which offered much better drainage at twice the cost. Pan °f ers
The Commission reviewed the two SEH plans and offered revision ideas for the first
less expensive plan to offer some additional drainage with
minimal cos, increase. This
revised plan is the one recommended by the Parks and MS/SL Recreation Commission.
0
21
er I ! YOOR $oca'r F �� \ I n 14
oil
0
Ivey
oRKlxoO Pare S/71- r".60jer"Pr
PLAN (PUZIOUNMY)
JVanw /O
MEMO TO: MAYOR AND COUNCILMEMBERS
4 FROM: MARY SAARION, DIRECTOR
PARKS, RECREATION AND FORESTRY
DATE: JUNE 1, 1989
SUBJECT: COMMISSION ORDINANCE REVISIONS
Mayor and council requested that I provide a reMion to the membership
portion of the Planning and Parks and Recieation Commission ordinance.
Please review these revisions. The underlined portion is the addition -to
the current as written.
MS/sl
attachment
It
Ui
°Daiwris
CHppTER 32
THE pLANNINO COMMISSION
32.02 Com,�o '
p ointed Members Terms of Office. The ninPlae
members
and
Subdivision I.
than sev n nor more than rune members
Zoning Commission shall consist of not less oL�ted
o elation of Mounds View, vrith rero members d. to
as
from the resident p p ersons elected to a p
ublic body, to be app
royal of the City Council from applications submitted. The t not
student re resentaaves other than p rn sat least rivo of these terms,
by uie *Raypr with app rt Au+ -n" i 1:uCPx in fill
appointees shall have three-year sta,8 eaz on December 31. APPorr
At Pxoire each Y t meeting of the City
more than three tenrs, sr -de each Year at the otganiLA shall appoint a
expired terms are to be ma with approval
a of the City Council,
Council in January. The Mayor,
Chairperson.
cwTER 34
pARKs AND RECRF-ATION COMMISSION
ers
The Commission shall consist of nine m0,1 With
cent re resentatives appointed by the May
���-A approval of the City
with two members uc> Mayor, meeting of the Council In
of the majority, of the Council. Theregular
the approval erson at the first regu
Council, shall appoint a CltairP
34.02 COMP
January
ter
7]
d-a� //
PMEMORANDUM
Memo To :Mayor and City Council Members
From :Ric Minetor, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
Date :June 1, 1989
Subject :Woodale Drive Extension - O'Connell to TH 10
Hounds View Business Park South
The extension and widening of Woodale Drive between O'Connell and
TH 10 is proposed in conjunction with the Mounds View Business
Park South. This project would require acquisition of right-of-
way from 3 residential properties and the school district. The
school district has indicated thmt they would not require
monetary compensation for the right-of-way, but would desire
certain improvements or their property. These would include
safety fencing along the athletic field and re-establishment of
the berm and trees east of Edgewood which will need to be
removed.
The residents we need right-of-way from have indicated their
desire for monetary compensation. Everest has contacted an
® appraiser and will work with us in obtaining appraisals of the
necessary right-of-way and easements. We are requesting council's
approval to negotiate with the residents based on the appraisals
we receive. Final agreements would be presented to Council for
approval.
MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Public Works Foreman Ulrich /
elk
DATE: May 31, 1989
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF SEASONAL EMPLOYEES
F1
The City has budgeted for three seasonal employees through the
water and sewer accounts. I have received approximately 5
applications for these jobs and have intereviewed all of these
individuals. I am recommending approval of employment for the
following individuals:
Bruce Pebble $5.50 per hour
Bruce Lindahl $5.50 per hour
Tim fletlund $6.00 per hour
The reason for the higher wage for Mr. Hetlund is because he is
the only returning seasonal helper this year, and it has been
previous City policy that if a part-time employee returns each
summer and has performed to our standards and satisfaction the
prc:'ious --car, they are to receive a $.25 per hour raise. Tim
has been a very good employee for the City of Mounds View and,
therefore, I am adjusting his salary to $6.00 per hour. The
budgeted amount for part-time help is set at $6.00 per hour.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of employment
for Bruce Pebble, Bruce Lindahl and Tim Hetlund to be funded
equally from the water and sewer part-time employment account.
MU/BAC
Memo To :Mayor and City Council Members
From :Ric Minetor, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
Date :May 24, 1989
Subject :Partial Payment Request /1 - i,ametti & Sons
Sysco Development - Project 88-15
We have received a request for a partial payment for the public
improvement portion of. the Sysco developm^nt. L have reviewed tis
request and request theiamount ncies. I of $2?D,661 recommend to be charged toroval of tthe
payment
Sysco tax increment fund.
F
APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT NO. 1
PROJECT Mounds view/sysco
OWNER city of Mounds view
OWNER'S Protect ND......,, 88:1.. I ENGINEER's Project No....4.1298
......
CONTRACTOR...faretti ............................
............................................
Contract For ... ••••... Contract Date `e t• 15, 1989
For Work accompllahed through the date Df......... ('>ay7,7t,1989.................
STATEMENT Q WORK
Original Contract Amount s .. 517:929:50 Work To Date 242,808.00
5............
Not Change Orders 5............. Amount Retained ( s At) 12,140.40
Current Contract Amount S... 4,7r9z9:50 subtotal 3.330,667,60
Previous Payments Recommended S ...........•
Amount Due This Payment 5..230t6G7.60
CONTRACTOR's Certification:
The ander.lpnca CONTRACTOR Saltines that (11 aN pre.Ia.d pteldeea Pfm.et. neoind Rua OWMER an *a ... n of Soft to..
under the Can Mdat ,.fo.d bUon h... be.. gPI1N Or dbtNryo l.lNll .11 ealltnl... Of CONTRACTOR lhcw,.d In eeM..nINn SIM
Wert a... ad by Prla, ApPllutl.n. la, bymeml eemb...d I Ih,..eh ; In41.01.8 and tlt till. to all m.brlab Sad epaltnanl III.OrPOated In aid Walk e, atlbrwi.a listed In of uw,N by Into Aeollaetlon to, Payment will 9.43 to dWMell at U.,. of o y..nt
It.. and el.., at all it.... al.lm., 0... Hit Inb.. St. and enamaremeae ( ...... team a. odntrl by so., ......... It OWMRR 1.
Dated [ r n
' COCI CTOM =L�
ENGINEER'S ROCOIRM.ndatlor.:
This Application (with accompanying dp C,lM*"tatlpn) Matta the repuiramenta of the Contract 00oumanta and payment
of the above AMOUNT DUE THIS APPLICATION Is recommended.
/,,/� �/t�I �/
DatedA/i�ra �f ,9. % Westwood Professional Services, Inc.
By ✓� �q
9y
PROJECT NO. • 4-1298
APP'L. FOR PMT. NO. 1
DATE : 5-19-89
PROJECT:
Mounds View/sysco
ITEM
NO. CONiRACi ticErl
UNIT
UNIT PRICE
CONTRACT
SCHEOULE
WORK
CON?lf.7Ep
Quantity
Amount
Quantity
Amount
SANITARY SEWER
1
8 PVC San. Saw
2
Std. San, cy;
L.F. 32.00
654
20928.00
374
11968.00
'. a""o1e
Each 1500.00
2
3
16 Stcet Casing
3000.00
y
3000.QQ
4
Connect to Existing
L.F. 200.00
200
40000.00
•197
39400.00
�
L••• 1000.00
1
SUBTOTAL
--1000_00
1
1000.00 '
WATER MAIN
64928.00
55368.00
1
4 D.I.p.
L.F. 14.00
32
;._.
448.00
3
8 D.I.P.
L.F. 15.00
4050.00
130
1950.00
10 D.I.P.
L.F. 16.00
4807
76912.00
2505
40080.00
5
16" D.I.P.
L.F. 20.00
80
1600.00
50
1000.00
6
8"
L.F. 30.00
18
540.00
60
X 4" TEE
160Q.00
EACH 100.00
1
7
X 6" TEE
100.00
0
0.00
8
EACH 100.00
17
1300.00
16" X 8" CROSS
7
700.00
EACH 420.00
1
9
"' X 8" TEE
420.00
1
420.00
EACH 100.00
5
10
2" X10 " TAPING VALVE
500.00
4
400.00
ND SLEEVE
L S 750.00
1
'
150.00
1
750.00
11
" X 6" REDUCES
EACH 50.00
1
12
YDRANT W/AUX, VALVE
50.00
0
0.00
13
EACH 1200.00
13 15600.00
7
GATE VALVE
B000.00
EACH 2O0.00
I
1
200.00
0
0.O(4 r
r PROJECT NO.: 4-1298
APP'L. FOR PMT. NO.:
♦� DATE : 5-19-89
PROJECT: Mounds view/sy
ITE`II
NO- CONTRACT ITEM
UNIT
UNIT PRICE
CONTRACT
Quantity
SCHEDULE
Amount
WORK CGHPLETED
Quantity Amount
14
8" GATE VALVE
EACH
350.00
8
2800.00
2
700.00
15
10 " GATE VALVE
EACH
500.00
1
500.00
C
O.00
16
4" D.I.P. PLUG
EACH
15.00
1
15.00
0
0.00
17
8" D.I.P. PLUG
EACH
25.00
1
25.001
0
0.00
8
iU" D.L.P. PLUG
EACH
50.00
L
50.00
0
0.00
.9
16" D.I.P. PLUG
EACH
150.00
l
I50.00
2
300.00
0
8" 90 DECREE BEND
EACH
100.00
4
400.00
5
500.00 -
... 8" 45 DEGREE BEND
•
EACH
90.00
3
270.00
7
630.00
-2
-18 " 22-1/2 DEGREE BEND
EACH
90.00
9
. 810.00
1
90.00
=3
8" 11-1/4 DEGREE BEND
EACH
90.00
7
630.00
6
540.00
8" 45 " TIPTEE
EACH
100.00
1
100.00
0
0.00
.5
P.I. VALVE
EACH
700.00
5
3500.00
4
2800.00
i
CONNECT TO EXISTING 8" STUB
L.S.
500.00
1
500.00
1
500.00
20 " STEEL CASING
L.F.
200.00
60
12000.00
50
1OOOO.00
SUBTOTAL
------------
-----
---------
I24220.03
71560.00
STORM SEWER
12 " RCP CL.3
L.F.
20.00
30
600.00
0
0.00
12 " RCP CL. 3
L.F.
20.00
I10
2200.00
0
0.00
15" RCP CL 3
L.F.
22.00
1!0
2420.00
n
0.00
'
6 " A -RCP CL 4
L.F.
50.00
519
31tL0.00
0
0.00
PROJECT NO.: 4-1298
APP'L. FOR PMT. NO.: 1
DATE: 5-19-39
PROJECT: Mounds view/Sysco
ITEM
NO.
CONTRACT ITEM
UNIT
UNIT
PRICE
CONTRACT SCHEDULE
UOP.X COMPLETED
quantity
A.aount
Quantity
Amount
5
42" A -RCP CL 4
L.F.
70.0
130
9100.00
0
0.00
6
CONSTRUCT CATCH BASIN
EACF
950.0
4
3800.00
0
0.00
DESIGN (4020)
7
12" RC PIPE APRONS
EAC
200.01
4
800.00I
0
0.00
8
15" RC PIPE APRONS
EACH
250.0
4
1000.00
0
0.00
9
CONSTRUCT CATCH
EACH
2000.00
2
4000.00
0
0.00
BASIN DESIGN (4020)
10
CL 3 RIP RAP
C.Y.
30.00
40
1200.00
0
0.00
li
GRANULAR FILTER
S.Y.
5.0c
20
100.00
0
0.00
BLANKET
12
TIMBER BAFFLE/
L.S.
200O.00
1
2000.00
0
0.00--
SKIMMER
13
42" A -RCP FLARED END
EACH
800-00
2
1600.00
0
0.00
SUBTOTAL STORM SEWER
59960.00
0
0.0O
ROADWAY 6 GRADING
1
CLEARING
ACRE
500.00
26.2
13100.00
21.2
10600.00
2
GRUBBING
ACRE
250.00
26.2
6550.00
21.2
5300.00
3
REMOVE BITUMINOUS
S.Y.
1.50
1470
2205.00
0
0.00
PAVEMENT
4
COMMON EXCAVATION
C.Y.
1.00
129980
129980.00
99980
99980.00
5
SUBGRADE EXCAVATION
C.Y.
1.00
1700
1700.00
0
0.00
`te9+
C,
PROJECT: Mounds view/Sysm
PROJECT NO. • 4-1298
APP'L. FOR PMT. NO.: 1
DATE : 5-19-89
ITEFI
NO.
CONTRACT ITEM
UNIT
UNIT
PRICE
CONTRACT SCHEDULE
WORK COMPLETED
Quantity
Amount
Quantity
Amount
6 SELECT GRANULAR
C.Y.
4.50
3875
17437.50
0
O.OG
BORROW 5% HOD
7 SUBGRADE PREPARATION
S.Y.
0.30
23650
7155.00
0
0.00
8 CL 5 AGGREGATE BASE
G.Y.
11.60
1300
15080.00
0
0.00
9 GRANULAR BORROW
I C.Y.
2.50
2130
.5125.00
0
0.00
10 CL 5 SHOULDER MATERIAL
I TON
11.00
89
979.00
0
0.00
11 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC
S.Y.
1.25
1600
2000.00
0
0.00
12 3" BASE COURSE MIXTURE
TON
13.05
540
7047.00
0
0.00
13 1-1/2 BINDER COURSE
TON
13.60
270
3672.00
0
0.00
14 1-1/2 WEAR COURSE MIX
TON
15.10
270
4077.00
0
0.00
15 BIT. MAT'L FOR MIXTURE
TON
130.00
36
4680.00
0
0.00
16 BIT. MATT. FOR MIXTURE.
TON
130.00
16
2080.00
0
0.00
17 BI1. PAT'L FOR TACK COAT
CAL
2.00
330
660.00
0
0.00
i8 CURS 6 GUTTER B612
L.F.
5.00
670
3350.06
0
0.00
19 CONCRETE MEDIAN
L.F.
12.00
80
960.00
--------
0
------
0.00
--------
SUBTOTAL ROADWAY
218037.50
0
15880.00
LANDSCAPING
1 DOUGLAS FIR
EACH
155.00
39
6045.00
0
0.00
2 COLORADO GREEN SPRUCE
EACH
150.00
20
3000.00
0
0.00
3 NOR'WAY PINE
EACH
145.00
20
2900.00
0
0.00
4 SCOTCH PINE
EACH
140.00
20
2900.00
0
0.00
�1
I
PROJECT NO.: 4-1298 ✓
APP'L. FOR PMT. NO. :
DATE : 5-19-89
PROJECT: hounds view/Sysco
ht
UNT.
CONTRACT ITEM (UNIT
UNIT
PRICE
CONiR0.Ci SCHEDULE
UpRX COMPLETED
Quantity
Amount
Quantity
Amcunt
V
0.00
5
AUSTRIAN PINE
EACH
140.00
29
4060.00
6
TYPE S MULCH
C.Y.
1.00
155
155.00
0 I
0.00
7
SEEDING.
ACRE
1200.00
13.4
16080.00
0 j
0.00
a
SEE!) MIXTURE 600
LBS
2.00
775
1550.00
0 I
0.00
y
SEEU HItiTURE 300
LBS '
14.00
225
3150.00I
0 I
0.00
10
COl4SERICAL FERTILIZER
LBS
0.12
0700
1044.OG
-- 0- I
0.00-
40?84.00
0
0.00
SUBTOTAL LANDSCAPING
BID SUMMARY
64928.00
55368.00
SANITARY SEWER
124220.00
71560.00
WATER MAIN SUBTOTAL
ISTORH
SEWER SUBTOTAL
59960.00
0.00
228037.50
15880.00
ROADWAY SUBTOTAL
40784.00
0.00
LANDSCAPING SUBTOTAL
517929.50
42808.00
TOTAL SANITARY SEWER
WATER MAIN, STORM SEWER
ROADWAY 6 LANDSCAPING
I
MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Public Works Foreman Ulrich
DATE: May 31, 1989
SUBJECT: PURCHASE OF AIR COMPRESSOR, ASPHALT ROLLER AND TRAILER
In 1989 we budgeted for the replacement of our roller and air
compressor for the purpose of taking over the previously
contracted patching of the City's streets. The budgeted amount
for the asphalt roller was $7,209.00. The amount for the air
compressor was $5,151.00; both to be equally divided between
water, sewer and streets.
The following is a quote received for the air compressor:
Carlson Equipment Co. $5,095
In seeking out quotes for an air compressor, I have fouhd only
one distributor that can furnish us with an air compressor to our
specifications. The reason being is that we allotted funds to
purchase a used air compressor. The type of use that we foresee
our air compressor receiving in the future would be a relatively
small amount of jack hammer usage for cutting patches, some sand
blasting a painting of fire hydrants and water equipment, and
also for winterization of our current sprinkler systems, both at
City Hall and at Silver View Park. With this limited amount of
usage, we could not justify the purchase of a brand new air
compressor. The estimates that I received from various dealer
for the purchase of a new permanent 185 cubic foot air compressor
could have cost from $10,000 to $12,000. As you can see, we have
essentially cut our investment for the air compressor in half by
specking and purchasing a used air compressor.
The following are quotes of rollers that we demonstrated during
the summer of 1988:
Carlson Equipment Co. $6,500
Aspen Equipment Co. $6,275
Although both of the rollers met the required specifications, the
low bidder, Aspen Equipment Company, offers a more desirable
piece of equipment. The major factor being that the Beuthling
B100 Roller offers a two-year warranty.
An item that was overlooked during the budgeting process was a
means c`_ transportation for this roller. During the period of
demonstration we were allowed the use the equipment dealer's
_railer to transport the roller from job site tc `ob site.
Currently, we do not have a trailer that will meet the required
capacity for transporting this roller safely. Due to this
overs:c, 1 have asked both bidders to furnish me with
cuotat:ons of the tra:lar they would of'_er. Carlson Equipment
-2-
Company offers a trailer which cannb
Carlson Equipment Co.
Aspen Equipment Co.
c
$1,995
$2,000
The total funds needed for the purchase of this equipment is
$13,365. our total funds available is $12,306: leaving an
additional $1,059 needed to complete the purchase. Since I made
an error in budgeting for this program and forgot to include a
trailer for the transportation of the roller, I am requesting
that the additional $1,059 ba funded equally from water,, sewer
and general under the capital accounts of each department. If
You remember, we were approximately $12,000 under budget for thee, the
purchase of the cat loader and snow equipment, thereforer
should be adequate funds in those accounts for the purchase there
the trailer.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: .Staff recommends the awards of the
equipment, trailer and air compressor to Carlson Equipment
Company and the asphalt roller to Aspen Equipment Compdny for a
total purchase price of $13,365 to be divided equally and charged
to the respective water, sewer and street capital funds.
MU/BAC
it,
MRMO TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: CLERK-ADMINISTRAT
DATE: MAY 23, 1989 e*
SUBJECT: ON -SALE MALT LIQUOR SALES
Asyou may recall, approximately nine months ago Tony Jambor
requested that the City consider authorizing the sale of
malt liquor by the holders of non -intoxicating on -sale
licenses whose gross receipts are at least 60% attributable
to the sale of food. The Council, at that time, directed
that the City Attorney draft an ordinance amerdment for
consideration which would allow for this to occur.
Attached please find a copy of Ordinance No. 467 which would
amend the City's non -intoxicating liquor code allowing for
the sale of intoxicating malt liquor by on -sale non-intoxi-
caliny uialt liquor licensees when their gross receipts are
at least 60% attributable to the sale of food. The
ordinance also provides the application process for this
license and further provides that no additional license fee
will be required. Your consideration on this matter would
be appreciatcJ.
DFP/MJS
Attachment:
ORDINANCE NO. 467
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
AN ORDTNANCE AMENDING THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF MOUNDS VIEW
BY AMENDING CHAPTER 101 ENTITLED, "NON -INTOXICATING LIQUOR"
The City Council of the City of Mounds View does
hereby ordain:
SECTION I. Chapter 101.02 is amended by adding the
following:
(4) A holder of an "on -sale" license to sell non -
intoxicating malt liquor pursuant to 101.02, (2); who is
also licensed to sell "on -sale" wine pursuant to Chapter
101.02, Subdivision 6; and whose gross receipts are at least
sixty percent (60%) attributable to the sale of food, is
permitted to sell intoxicating malt liquor at "on -sale"
without an additional license.
SECTION II. Chapter 101.03 is amended by adding the
following:
Subdivision 2. Applications for a license to sell
intoxicating malt liquor 'on -sale pursuant to the require-
ments of 101.02, (4) shall include documentation to
substantiate food sales equal or exceeding sixty percent
(60%) of gross receipts for the 12 month period of November
1st through October 31st preceeding the license issuance
date. Documentation shall be by statement of a certified
public accountant based upon an audit of sales receipts or
other certifiable records of the business in connection with
which the proposed license will operate.
SECTION III. Chapter 101.04, (3) is amended by
adding the following:
(a) No additional license fee shall be required
of a licensee who sells intoxicating malt
liquor "on -sale" pursuant to the requirements
Of 101.02, (4).
SECTION IV. This ordinance shall take effect thirty
days after the date of its publication.
Read by the Council of the City of Mounds View on
this of 1 1989.
ORDINANCE NO. 467
PAGE TWO OF TWO
Read and passed by the City Council of the City of
Mounds View this day of , 1989.
ATTEST: Mayon
(SEAL)
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney
C
11
Clerk -Administrator
MEMO TO: MAYOR AND CITY COU\��NCCI{{ }��,�},��
FROM: CLERK -ADMINISTRATOR
DATE: MAY 16, 1989 °�
SUBJECT: CITY SIGNS
As you know, the City recently sent a letter to Mr. Kermit
McRae of the Minnesota Department of Transportation
regarding permits for the placement of City signs on Highway
10 right-of-way at the east and west entrances to the City.
Attached please find a letter from Mr. McRae which indicates
that the Minnesota Department of Transportation would not be
:tilling to issue a permit for the placement of a permanent
sign on the right-of-way but would be interested in working
with the City to reconvey a small parcel of land on which
our current .sign is located and is at the intersection of
Highway 10 and County Road H on the northeast corner.
Discussions regarding the placement of a City sign on the
west end of the City revealed that no right-of-wav is
available for a sign and that our current City sign was
installed without a permit. Representatives of the
Minnesota Department of Transportation have suggested that
we contact the owners association at Knollwood Green to
determine the feasibility of placing a City entrance sign on
their property, directly off of highway right-of-way.
At this time, Staff is requesting Council direction as to
the acquisition of surplus land from the Department of
Transportation for the east entrance sign and communication
with the Knollwood Green owners association for the west
entrance sign. Should you direct us to pursue these
matters, Staff will be making appropriate contacts with the
two groups to determine the willingness of them to give us
the right-of-way and any costs that might be associated
thereto. Your direction in this matter would be
appreciated.
DFP/MJS
Attachment:
` "'T04 Minnesota
t6 Department of Transportation
Q District 9
ti''oF rer�'yi 3485 Hadley Avenue North
Oakdale, Minnesota 55109
May 9, 1989
Mr. Donald F. Pauley
Clerk -Administrator
City of Hounds View
2401 Highway 10
Hounds View, Minnesota 55112
Dear Mr. Pauley:
SUBJECT: C.S. 6204 (TH 10)
Placement of City Signs
This is in response to your April 5, 1989 letter requesting an exemption
to Mn/DOT s policy limiting the placement of signs within highway
right-of-way, so that "city signs" could be installed along T.H. 10
at the east and west entrances to your city.
On Friday, April 28, 1989, Mary LaPlante and Bruce Hall of our District
Traffic Office, met with Rick Minetor of the City of Hounds View, to
discuss the type of sign that the city Is requesting and to field review
the possible locations for these signs.
While the type of sign that the city is proposing is aesthetically
pleasing, we feel that due to its permanency, and in keeping with State
Statute, we cannot allow the installation of this sign on Trunk Highway
right-of-way.
In 1986, we allowed, by permit, the installation of a "Welcome To The
City of Hounds View" sign, on the east side of T.H. 10 between Rice
Creek and County Road H. In reviewing this location with our District
Right of Way Engineer, Adeel Lari, we find that the Possibility exists
for the city to purchase a parcel of land to the southeast quadrant
of the intersection of T.H. 10 and County Road H, as shown on the attached
sketch. Mn/DOT would be receptive to a reconveyance in this area, and
would conduct a formal review upon receipt of a written request by the
City of Mounds View.
Sincerely,
Kermit K. McRae, P.E.
District Engineer
Attachment:
M
An Equal Opportunity Employer
E
to.
¢fin.4 g\r
. q�u
nN'�1'v3'v3
1� to�Wv�-
,
moo•
66�
2V/,
M
FA
MEMO TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: CLERK-ADMINISTRATO �J
DATE: MAY 22, 1989
SUBJECT: KNOLLWOOD DRIVE EXTENDED RIGHT-OF-WAY
The City of Mounds View currently owns a small parcel of
land directly south of Knollwood Drive at Ardan Avenue which
is dedicated right-of-way for the extension of Knollwood
Drive south towards Highway 10. In the past, the City has
cooperated with property owners abutting both sides of this
right-of-way in cleaning up the right-of-way and attempting
to maintain it in an acceptable manner.
In mid -April I received a telephone call from Mr. Tim Urman
of 2856 Ardan Avenue, the property owner directly east of
this right-of-way, requesting that the City allow him to
clear the right-of-way which is overgrown with scrub brush
and maintain it as a grass surface. I advised Mr. Urman,
that his request would need to be made in writing and
approved by the City Council and that the City Attorney
would need to be consulted regarding any potential liability
the City might assume by allowing this property to be used
as an extension to his own property. I contacted City
Attorney Karney who recommended that a written agreement
®, between the City and Mr. Urman be entered into which allows
him to clear, seed or sod and mow the property with an
understanding that he will not assume any control of the
property, nor is it a license to use the property in any
other manner.
After advising Mr. Urman of the City Attorney's opinion, we
received a letter dated May 16, 1989, copy attached, from
Mr. Urman requesting that the City level, remove tree
stuiaps, and haul black dirt onto the property at which time
he would agree to seed and maintain the property with no
intentions of attempting to assume ownership.
Rather than proceed any further with this request by asking
the Public Works Director to make an assessment regarding
the cost for clearing the property and hauling in black
dirt, I felt it would be appropriate to discuss the matter
with you at an agenda session and determine whether or not
you were willing to proceed with this matter any further.
I am placirg the request on your •June 5th Agende. Session.
Should you agree to give further consideration to
Mr. Urman's request, I would suggest that staff be directed
to determine the cost for clearing the property and hauling
in black dirt as well as determining when such work could be
completed based upon current workloads. Your direction in
this matter would be appreciated.
DFP/MJS
t, >
MEMO TO: MAYOR AND CI'PY COON
FROM: CLERK-ADMINISTRAT
DATE: MAY 31, 1989
SUBJECT: STANLEY FISHER ADDITION, WETLAND CONTROL
STRUCTURE
As you may recall, the City has over the past few years, been
attempting to have the storm water control structure with wier
and skimmer installed on the Stanley Fisher Addition as is
required by Development Agreement No. 86-77. In 1988 staff
appeared in Anoka County Conciliation Court in an effort to
obtain award in the amount of $2,000 for installation of this
structure. At that time the Judge deemed that the City was not
damaged as we had not incurred any expense. The Judge further
advised that should the City install the structure we would be
able to return to Court and obtain those damages for payment at
that time.
The City recently received correspondence from Mr. Robert Lowell
Smith, an attorney for the administrator of the Stanley Fisher
estate, Marcella Rybak, proposing an agreement between Ms. P.ybak
and the City to terminate the construction escrow. A copy of
Mr. Smith's original letter and proposed agreement is attached.
Upon receipt of the agreement, I reviewed it with City Attorney
® Karney who advised me that he found it to be totally acceptable
in that it would ultimately allow for the City to receive the
funds necessary to construct the control structure as well as
receiving the $1,000 security deposit for maintenance of the
ponding area and control structure. In discussing the amount
proposed by Mr. Smith, I indicated to City Attorney Karney that
our engineering estimate in .1.988 for the construction of this
structure was $2,000 and that Mr. Smith had proposed an escrow in
the amount of $1500. Mr. Karney suggested that I correspond with
Mr. Smith requesting that the escrow amount be increased to
$2,000 with an understanding that should the structure be built
for less than that amount, the difference be refunded to the
estate. Attached is a copy of my letter of. May 22, 1988
communicating that request to Mr. Smith. On May 24, 1989
Mr. Smith responded by agreeing to these changes.
Staff is bringing this item to the City Council at this time for
your review with a recommendation that the 1. ;r be authorized to
enter into this agreement. Hopefully, this will finally resolve
the issues revolving around the Stanley Fisher Addition, namely
the construction of a control structure and the maintenance and
operation of the structure and ponding areas. Your direction in
this matter would be appreciated.
DFP/MJS
Attachments:
ROBERT LOWELL SMITH
ATTORNEY AT LAW
ale QA Nvcw c",i N*
-0 AO 4Tx STUIST
MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 504:Z
ie12133i70Be
Aoear WWXU ftM ft. XP"
May 24, 1989
City of Mounds View
2401 Highway 10
Mounds View, Mina. 55112
Attention: Mr. Donald F. Pauley
Clerk -Administrator
Dear Mr. Pauley:
Thank you for your letter of May 22nd. I have discussed the
City's proposal with Ms. Rybak on behalf of the estate and the
proposal to add $500.00 to the escrow amont for the weir is ac-
ceptable to us. You may simply proceed to revise the language in
the escrow release document I sent to you to reflect the amount
as $2,000.00 and , further, to reflect the possibility of return
of unused sums to the family.
I assume that the bank suggestion is acceptable and I'll contact
the branch in mounds View and provide them with information on the
family social security numbers.
Call if there any other questions.
RLS/wmt
CC: Marcella Rybak
U
Yours very truly, /
RobirC—towell �mith
r
cify of VOP 9 iew
Mr. Robert Lowell Smith
915 Grain Exchange Building
400 South Fourth Street
Minneapolis, MN 55415
RE. JLAAley iisheY Addition Construction Escrow ,
GATEWAY
May 22, 1989
Dear Mr. Smith:
RAM}EV CO UNT V, MIN NE50T4
7401 HIGHWAY 10
MOUNDS VIEW, MINN. 55117
This office is in receipt of your letter of April 27, 1489
regarding termination of the escrow arrangement for the
Stanley Fisher Addition.
ItThe City Attorney and I have reviewed your proposed
agreement and, except for the escrow amount for construction
of a wier structure on Outlot A, find it acceptable and
would be prepared to recommend approval of it to the City
Council. We would ask that the escrow amount for construc-
tion of the wier structure be increased to $2,000 based upon
estimates made by our engineering firm in 1988. The City of
Mounds View does not wish to assume any unnecessary
additicnal expenses for construction of this wier which is
an obligation of Mrs. Rybak. Therefore, we ask for the
additional $500 in the escrow acccunt. Should the City not
expend the entire amount of $2,000 the difference could be
refunded to Mrs. Rybak once the work has been completed.
We will aXait your response with regard to this matter.
truly
MOUNDS
OFP/MJS
ROBERT LOWELL SMITH
ATTORNEY AT LAW
SIS 611.UN EXCHANG9 SUIMING
AM SOUTH AN STREET
MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55415
mini 3317880
ROBERT LGWSLL SMITH
Fir.. Donald Pauley
City of Mounds View
2401 Highway 10
Mounds View, Mn. F1112
Fe: Stanley Fisher Addition
PAUL S. SMITH
April 27, 1989
4fC;iYEv ---
L.'7
?eC9' 90 ••
Dear Mr. Pauley:-';;jr{��%
Enclosed for your consideration there please fin& a
proposed agreement for termination of the escrow arrange-
ment and for solution of the outstanding matters on this
development agreement (no. 86-77).
We are proposing that the required $1,000.00 sum be placed
in an account at the First State Bank of New Brighton subject
to the language in paragraph 8 of the development agreement.
The other provision relates to the weir structure or
drainage structure from the Outlot A under the road in the
direction of the park. Doug Franklin has at least two of
our engineering drawings for the structure but he has never
given us a final quote nor indication that he will do the job;
accordingly it makes more sense to accept your proposal that
we pay the City and let them do it in the manner and time frame
which they desire.
Call if you have any questions on the enclosed. If they
are in order would you provide us with two executed copies and
we will follow up with the escrow agent and the Bank, keeping
you informed in that process.
Also, r.pon completion of the above we propose to deed Outlot
A to the City if they are interested in it. Advise us of that
as well.
Yours'N� truly, ,
�.oy-
RLS/tat /\ Loc"'�pi1 /
cc: Marcella M. Rybak l ✓
3
TERMINATION OF CONSTRUCTION ESCROW
AGREEMENT
The following persons are parties to this agreement:
1. The City of Mounds View, Minnesota, hereinafter "City";
2. The Stanley Rybak Estate, by Marcella M. Rybak, Ad-
ministratrix, and the heirs of that Estate, e;t such
time as the Estate shall be closed by the Probate
Court of Ramsey County, Minnesota, hereinafter "Estate";
Certain funds are presently held in escrow with the Escrow
Agent listed below, and the terms of that Escrow are essentially
as follows:
A. A sum of One Thousand ($1,000.00) Dollars is to be held
and is being held pursuant to City of Mounds View Development
Agreement No. 86-77, Exhibit 2A, in order to provide, consistent
with paragraph 8 of that Agreement, ". . . a $1,000.00 security
for seven years to guarantee the ponding area and control struct-
ure," as set forth in that Agreement. Since the Estate is being
Cclosed such sum shall be transferred to an account at the First
State Bank of New Brighton, in the names of the four heirs of
the Estate, (who shall provide their Social Security Numbers to
the Bank for the purpose of designation of interest receipt and
tax accounting responsibility);and, further, such sum shall be
held until December 30, 1994, and, after provision for such
use of the money (principal sum) as may be required by the guar-
antee above set• forth, any remaining principal and the accrued
interest shall be released to the Estate heirs, or their assigns,
on December 31, 1994, and the security required by aforesaid
Development Agreement shall then cease.
B. The Construction Escrow Agreement had provided for
' I theescrowing of the sw.k of One Thousand Five Eiundred ($1,500.00)
�C Dollars for the comoletion of a weir structure or drainage
0
t
structure out of Outlot A of the Stanley Fisher Addition.
By settlement and agreement of the parties the sum of One
Thousand Five Hundred Dollars shall be released from said
Escrow Account and paid to the City of Mounds View as full
and complete settlement of the responsibility for the com-
pletion of the weir structure or drainage structure; Further,
that the City shall be entitled to make such deci.eion as it,
alone, may deem appropriate for such structure. The Estate
shall be released of all further responsibility under the
Development Agreement No. 85-77 fur the weir structure or
drainage structure, and any funds remaining in said Construc-
tion Escrow shall be released forthwith to the Estate represen-
tative.
That a fully executed copy of this Agreement shall be
provided Land Title, Arden Hills, Minnnesota, which company
is presently holding the Escrowed funds.
Executed by the parties hereto on the date sho,,;n opposite
their signatures.
Estate of Stanley Rybak City of Mounds View
By
Marcella. M. yRyak,
Administratrix and
Date: April 27, 1989 Date:
Schedule attached of estate heirs and their S-S, Nos.
MEMO TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
-11 FROM: CLERK -ADMINISTRATOR
DATE: MAY 16, 1989
SUBJECT: MARSH PARK PROFESSIONAL OFFICES
Over the past few years, Staff has been having discussions
on and off with Mr. Dale Jones regarding the development of
an office park on the triangular portion of property bound
by Highway 10, Silver Lake Road and the St. Paul Water-
works right-of-way. This land has also been identified
previously as the County Road I triangle. Mr. Jones has
been able to acquire a large portion of the 12 acre site
excluding the property owned by George Winiecki and TJB
Builders which total 5 lots.
As you may recall, several years ago this site was
designated as a tax increment district although no formal
project has ever been submitted to the City Council for ,your
consideration. On May 8th I received correspondence from
Mr. Jones' attorney, Mr. Wilbur F. Dorn, Jr., providing the
City with proposed site plans for the project and a request
that the City Council give an indication as to your desire
to provide tax increment assistance for this project.
I have not had our consultants review the project due to the
fact that minimal financial information is available at this
time. My review and past experience with tax increment in
Mounds View, including the Mounds View Business Park South
project, would lead me to believe that Mr. Dorn's
conclusions that the project would support a $1 million
dollar tax increment issue over a fifteen year period is
tenuous at best. The Mounds View Business Park South
project producing a market value of better than double the
proposed market value for this project is unable to produce
$2 million for an 11 year period.
Rather than getting into any great detail regarding the
financial viability of the project, it would be my thought
that the Council should simply discuss whether or not you
are interested in funding another tax increment project at
this time and whether or not this is the type of project you
wish to support with tax increment funds. Extenuating
circumstances that you need to be aware of regarding this
project site are that a large wetland would be involved on
the project requiring a wetland alteration permit to allow
for relocation of portions of the wetland and construction
within the 100 foot buffer zone. Also, the project site is
within the current moratorium district along Highway 10.
The Council does have the authority to waiver the require-
ments be of athe
naturemoratorium
youdistrict
wouldshould
beyof significantect
benefit to the community and is consistent with the proposed
Comprehensive Land Use Plan which is currently in the
MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
PAGE TWO
MAY 16, 1989
drafting stage. Although I do not expect tha': you would
indicate to the developer that permits would be issued for
the alteration of wetlands or waiver of the moratorium
ordinance, it M;ould seem reasonable that if you are not
inclined to consider those two items that you should advise
the developer at this time as any indication f interest in
tax increment assistance would simply
hat would not receive
of
additional doilars for
project
other necessary approvals.
I will be happy to discuss the request of Mr. Jones'
attorney at your June Sth aganda session and would request
your direction as to a response to Mr. Dorn at that time.
DFP/MJS
J't�J3 ,
Memo To: Mayor and City Council Members
From . Ric Hinetor, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
Date : June 1, 1989
Subject: County Road J / 85th Ave. -Reconstruction
The informational meeting on this project was hold May 23rd at
Spring Lake Park. City Hall. There were a number of Mounds View
residents in attendance. The attached draft study report covers
the raisepresentation concerns
by ourresidents regarded the trecomm ndedrtypical section
of the roadway, additional right-of-way needed, and the financing
of the project.
The recommended alternative for County Road J is a 4 lane section
with curb and gutter on both sides. Segment 1 begins at TH 63 and
ends just west of Knollwood Drive. Segment 2 begins approximately
1/2 mile west Of Xylite Street. Segment 3 is the section between
these 2 segments and will be a Mn/DOT project. Sidewalk is shown
on the south side of segment 1 through Spring Lake Park.
Currently, the recommendation is for the walk to continue on the
south side through Mounds View to Spring lake Road. This could be
extended or eliminated within Mounds View. No sidewalks are shown
on Segment 2.
Additional right-of-way will be needed for this project. An
additional 10 feet will be required along the south side of
segments 1 and 2. This will be the City's responsibility to ll be at the
acquire. The necessary right-of-way for segment 3 wi intersection of Eastwood Drive . There appears td J. This is a part
and County Roa
Of Mn/pOT's project o be no major impact to any
of the property owners in segment 1 or 2 due to the right-of-way.
i have indicated that the current City position on financing this
project is to utilize our Municipal State Aid funds. This would
mean there would be no assessments to property owners for the
project. Currently the cost is estimated at approximately
$32,000. However, this does not include right-of-way costs. We
have budgeted a total of $90,000 toward this project. It appears
that we may be significantly under budget, depending on right-of-
way acquisition costs.
11
Certain issues remain to be resolved by council. These include )
finalizing funding sources, the desire for a public meeting,
right-of-way acquisition method, and final decisio„ un the
typical section for this project. Funding has been proposed to be
from NSA funds; however, a percentage of storm sewer costs may
not be eligible. These costs could be funded by the Storm Water
Management fund.
finless costs o: the project are to be assessed, there is no legal
inrequirement ff
formational meeting Publicor a nd all e affected There esid nts were notified•
The council may desire to hold an additional public informational
meeting and the consultant has indicated they would be available
for a presentation. The council will be asked to recommend
approval of the study report and project.
Right-of-way acquisition will be necessary in Mounds View. Ramsey
County s policy requires the City to acquire the necessary rigt-
of-way. Anoka County is acquiring the right -oP-wap in Anoka h
County. Anoka County has offered to assist us in appraisals and
acquisition. This would be especially important in appraisals t:o
insure consistent appraisals along the project. i believe it
would also be beneficial in negotiations if we work with Anoka
County through the acquisition process.
The alternatives to consider regarding the typical section are
the number of lanes and the areas to have sidewalk. Alternate 1
listed in the study report is A 4 lane section with curb and
gutter. Alternate 2 is a 3 lane section with shoulders and curb
and gutter. Both sections would be 52 feet in width. Currently
sidewalk is only proposed from the west City limits to Spring
Lake Road. This could be eliminated or extended easterly to the
limits of segment 1. No sidewalk is currently proposed on
segment 2.