HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packets - 1989/10/02CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
CITY COUNCIL
OCTOBER 2, 1989
5:30 P.M. - 7:30 P.M. EXECUTIVERFOANNCE RMEDEVELOPSSION TO
REVIEWS OF CLERK
ADMINISTRATOR
7:30 P.M. - 8:00 P.M. COUNCIL BUDGET REVIEW
AGENDA SESSION
8:00 P.M.
1. Discussion of Communications Problems with Silver View
Park Area. Residents
2. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding Changes to
Proposed 1990 Budget
3. Discussion Regarding 1989 Long Term Financial Plan
(Information provided in 9/25/89 packet)
4. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding Rezoning of
Mounds View Business Park South to Planned Unit
Development (PUD)
5. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding Pioneer
Sebwinn Wetland Alteration Permit Request and Waiver of
Highway 10 Corridor Moritorium Requirements
6. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding Paster
Enterprises (Mounds View Square) Request for Rezoning
from B-4, Regional Business District, to B-3, Highway
Business District; a Conditional Use Permit for
Convenience Food Drive In Restaurant; and a Conditional
Use Permit - Planned Unit Development (PUD) to Allow
More than 1 Principal Building on a Lot
7. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding Intermittent
Lead Van Proposal - Discussion with Employees and Union
Representative
8. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding Bike Trail
Request on old Highway 8
9. Consideration of Stafi Memorandum Regarding City Survey
10. Discussion Regarding Resolution No. 2537 Establishing
Policy Regarding the Appointment of Students to
Commissions and Committees (Information provided in
9/25/69 packet)
11. Discussion of City of Mounds View's Sign Ordinance
(Gary Quick)
ORDINANCE NO. 476 (v `9
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF MOUNDS VIEW
BY AMENDING CHAPTER 101, ENTITLED, "NON -INTOXICATING
LIQUOR"
The City Council of the City of Mounds View does
hereby ordain:
SECTION I. Chapter 101.04, License Fees, (3) is
amended by adding the following:
SECTION II. This ordinance shall take effect
thirty days after the date of its publication.
Read by the City Council of the City of Mounds View
on the 25 day of September, 1989.
Read and passed by the City Council of the City of
Mounds View this _ day of , 1989.
ATTEST: _
Mayor
(SEAL)
Clerk -Administrator
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney
r
`4
PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
qq RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA
UNv n s Regular Meeting
y q'� �ii�� September 25, 1989
7 ia.i �' 2401 Hwy. 10, Mounds View, Mounds View CMNy55112
Hall
-------------------------------------
The Mounds View City Council was called to order by 1. Call to
F,ayor Hankner at 7:03 PM on Monday, September 26, 4989.
Order
The Pledge of Allegiance was said.
2. Pledge of
Allegiance
MEMBERS PRESENT: Councilmembers Quick (who joined the
meeting at 7.11), Blanchard, Paone, Wuori and Mayor
Hankner.
It was noted Councilmember Quick was attending another
meeting and would be joining the Council meeting shortly.
ALSO PRESENT: City Attorney Karney, Finance Director
Brager and City Planner Hren.
Motion/Second: Paone/Wuori to approve the September
11, 1989 minutes as corrected.
4 ayes 0 nays
There were no residents requests or comments from the
floor.
Mayor Hankner closed the regular meeting and opened
the first public hearing at 7:06 PM.
'ity Planner Hren explained the owner of Mid -American
Auto, at 2975 Highway 10, has requested a waiver to
the moratorium along Highway 10, as he would like to
erect a free-standing sign and eliminate all other
signage on the property. Due to the moratorium, he
could technically only paint a sign on the building.
The Planning Commission has reviewed the request and
recommends denial, based on the moratorium. Without
the moratorium, the sign would meet all code require-
ments.
3. Roll Call
4• Approval of
Minutes:
September 11,
1989
Mution Carried
5. Residents
Requests and
Comments from
the Floor
6. Public Hearing:
Mid -American
Auto Request
for Waiver of
Hwy. 10 Corridc
Moratorium
Requirements
Mounds View City Counci� jy
Regular Meeting V I ` hrrn � } V `U
------------------------------- 1 i -- Y
Mayor Hankner explained the moratorium was put in place
some months ago while the Comp Plan was being updated
for the Highway 10 corridor. It is due to be completed
in February, and will be followed by public hearings.
The moratorium is in effect until April, 1990.
Kevin Mullins, owner of Mid -American Auto, stated he
had not realized until recently that he needed to pre-
sent a hardship. He stated he needs to be competitive
with the other businesses in the area, and Spring Lake
Park has seven auto dealers with free-standing signs
on their property, and his lack of signage is hurting
his business. He added there is an existing cement
foundation base the sign would be erected on, and
electrical service is already in place, and he has
had a sign designed that would be in conformance with
all City requirements, and he presented a sketch of
what the sign would look like, as well as photos of
signs at dealerships in Spring Lake Park.
Councilmember Quick joined the meeting at 7:11 PM.
Mayor Hankner closed the public hearing and reopened
the regular meeting at 7:14 PM.
Mayor Hankner closed the regular meeting and opened
the second public hearing at 7:14 PM.
Ms. Hren explained Super America, who has recently
Purchased all 7-11 stores in Minnesota, has requested
a wetlands alteration permit for the store at 7295
Silver Lake Road, as the store sits in the wetland
buffer zone. They propose to change the sign and
mansard at this time, and would do additional work
later, to include landscaping, repair of the parking
lot and other minor repairs. They are requesting
approval of all changes at this time, to avoid having
to come back as they are ready to do each item. The
Planning Commission has reviewed the request and
recommends approval. The property is zoned B-1, and
would not be eligible for gas pumps, which require
B-3 zoning.
Jesse Varnes, 7350 Silver Lake Road, stated he would
like to see the place fixed up but he is concerned
that they may pump gas later.
Mayor Hankner explained they do not have room on their
property for gas pumps, nor is the zoning appropriate.
A request for the installation of gas pumps there was
denied in the past.
Ms. Hren reviewed the requirements for gas pumps.
She also noted they would have one year to complete
the work from the time the permit is issued.
September 25, 1989
Page Two
7. Public Hearing:
Request for
Wetland Altera-
tion Permit by
Super America,
7295 Silver
Lake Road
Mounds View City
Regular Meeting
Mayor Hankner closed the public hearing and reopened
the regular meeting at 7:18 PM.
Motion/Second: Wucri/Quick to approve the consent
agenda, as amended, and waive the reading of the
resolutions.
5 ayes 0 nays
Dr. George Realmuto, of the University of Minnesota
School of Medicine, Department of Child and Adole-
scent Psychiatry, distributed a synopsis of the study
he hopes to publish on the role of City government
in psychological relief services, related to the
Williams Pipeline disaster. Dr. Realmuto made a
slide presentation and reviewed the analysis of City
governments role in a disaster of this type, as well
as the findings of the door to door survey that was
done after the disaster.
The Council thanked Dr. Realmuto for his time and
making the presentation.
Mayor Hankner closed the regular meeting and opened
the third public hearing at 8:02 PM.
Mod Feders, of Buetow and Associates, architects
for the library, presented a scale model of the pro-
posed library, and he reviewed the Site plan and
proposed parking, landscaping, buiiding construction
and layout.
Grace Berry, no address given, asked if any of the
library property is optional for sale for something
else.
Mr. Feders responded it belongs to the County and is
planned for the future expansion of the library.
Carol Zolinski, of Groveland Avenue, extended her
thanks to everyone who has worked so hard to get the
library in Mounds View.
County Commissioner Duane McCarty reviewed the
history of getting the library in Mounds View.
Mayor Hankner closed the public hearing and reopened
the regular meeting at 8:17 PM.
September 25, 1989
Page Three
8. Approval of
Consent Agenda
Motion Carried
9. Presentation
of Williams
Pipeline
Disaster Study
10. Public Hearing:
Ramsey County
Library
Conditional
Use Permit for
Branch Library
Mounds view City Council
- September 25, 1989
RegularMeeting UNAPPROVED Page Four
--------------------------------------
Ron Langness, of Springsted Financial Advisors, report- 11. Presentation
ed bids had been opened earlier in the day for the of Bids for
Mounds View Business Park tax increment bond sale, and Mounds View
they are very pleased with the results. Interest Business Park
rates are close to projections, with five bids re- Tax Increment
ceived, and interest at 9.21%. Bond Sale -
Attorney Karney reported he had received the documen-
tation and reviewed it.
Notion/Second: Quick/Blanchard to approve Resolution
No. 2540, authorizing dnd awarding the sale of, and
providing the forms, terms, covenants and directions
for $1,490,000 taxable general obligation tax incre-
ment bonds, Series 1989C, to First Bank National
Association, and pledging for the security thereof
tax increment from Tax Increment Financing District
No. 1, and waive the reading.
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Motion/Second: Paone/Wuori to approve Resolution
No. 254 , authorizing the sale of, and providing
the forms, terms, covenants and directions for
$930,000 general obligation tax increment bonds,
isSeries 1989B, to Norwest Investment Services, and
pledging for the security thereof tax increment
from Tax Increment Financing District No. 1, and
waive the reading.
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Motion/Second: Paone/Hankner to approve Resolu- 12. Consideration
tion No. 2535, approving a conditional use permit of Resolution
and development site plans for the Ramsey County No. 2535
library located at 2575 Mounds View Drive,
Planning Case No. 277-89, and waive the reading.
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Motion/Second: Quick/Wuori to approve Resolution 13. Consideration
No. 2538, approving a wetland alteration permit of Resolution
for Super America to perform work in a wetland No. 2538
buffer area at 7295 Silver Lake Road, Planning
Case No. 279-89, and waive the reading.
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
0
Mounds View City Council
UNAPPR:01�
Se tember 25, 1989
Regular Meeting �7t}.�
Il'L..
--------------------------•------------------------------------------------
Page Five
Motion/Second: Quick/A'uori to approve Resolution
14. Consideration
No. 2536, approving the requested modification to the
of Resolution
moratorium district to allow the addition of a free-
No. 2536,
standing sign at Mid -American Auto located at
Mid -American
2975 Highway 10, to include that it has been deter-
Auto
minded the applicant nas demonstrated a hardship, it
does not affect the general health, safety and welfare
of the residents of the City, the approval of this
does not affect the integrity of the ordinance, and
it is consistent with the intent of the ordinance,
and waive the reading.
4 ayes 1 nay
Motion Carried
Councilmember Blanchard voted against the motion.
There was considerable discussion before the vote was
taken.
Councilmember Paone expressed concern that with this
exception, others along the Highway 10 corridor might
also ask to make chanoes.
Councilmember Blanchard stated she agreed with
Councilmember Paone's comments and added there is a
moratorium in place, and once one exception is
approved, it will be very difficult to control. She
added this weakens the moratorium and ordinance.
Councilmember Quick pointed out the intent was that
property could not be improved, and he considers
this type of request as not falling into that
category. He also pointed out if this is denied,
they might lose the opportunity for any improvement
to that property.
Councilmember Wuori stated in working on the Comp
Plan, they worked with the land usage, and did not
touch signage. She stated she does not feel this
interfers with the moratorium.
Ms. Hcen reviewed the conditions under which a
modification to the moratorium could be granted.
Mr. Mullins explained he bought the business in 1987,
and he reviewed the changes he has made since then.
He is trying to make improvements to the outside now,
and is requesting the sign approval. He explained
he has used the temporary sign permit, which is allowed
for three 21 day periods per year, and signage-at the
roadside does enhance and improve his business; and
they have a noticeable increase in sales when the
small boulevard sign is in use.
NAP
PR
OVEN -------------------------
September 25, 1989
Mounds View City Council, page Six
Regular Meeting ---------------------
--
Mayor Hankner stated she did not feel this affects the
integrity of the ordinance.
Attorney Karney recommended the resolution reflect
that the requirements of the ordinance have been met.
2nd Reading
Motion/Second: Quick/Hankner to table this item. 15. and Adoption
of ordinance
5 ayes 0 rays No. 470
Motion Carried
Ms. Hren explained the address change is required as
16. aftOReading
nce
the house being built is now facing Ardan Avenue,
No. 477
rather than Spring Lake Road.
Motion/Second: Paone/Blanchard to have the first
readiT Ordinance No. 477 amending the municipal
47, entitled
code of Mounds View by amending Chapter
the reading.
"House and Building Numbers", and waive
Motion Carried
5 aves 0 nays
Ms. Hren reviewed prop osed Ordinance No. 474.
17. 2nd Reading
and Adoption
Motion/Second: Quick/Wuori to have the second
of Ordinance
No. 474
readingadoption of Ordinance No. 474, amending
view municipal code en-
Chapter 42 of the Mounds
titled "Subdivision Regulations", and waive the
reading.
Councilmember Quick - aye
Councilmember Blanchard - aye
Councilmember Paone - aye
Councilmember Wuori - aye
Motion Carried
Mayor Hankner - aye
1st Reading
Finance Director Bragec explained proposed Ordi- 18. of Ordinance
nance No. 476 concerns license fees for non-intoxi- No, 476
cating liquor, and brings the Code into conformance
with State law.
Motion/Second: Quick/Hankner to have the first
Te—ading of ordinance No. 4706, amending
Chapterm101ci-
pal code of Mounds view by
entitled "Non -Intoxicating Liquor".
Motion Carried
5 ayes 0 nays
September 25, 1989
Mounds View City Council Page Seven
Regular Meeting 1-1-LIJIrVICIr nn -
' Mr. Brager read Ordinance No. 476.
rc osed Ordinance No. 475. 19. 1st Reading
Mr. Brager reviewed p p of Ordinance
Motion/Second: Paone/wuori to approve the first
No. 475
readinTOrdinance No. 475, amending the code of
Mounds View by amending Chapter 100 entitled
"Intoxicating Liquor", and waive the reading.
Motion Carried
5 ayes 0 nays
Paul Mielke, 5176 Brighton Lane, asked if this would 20. Consideration
of Resolution
apply only to students under age 18, or to all No. 2537
students regardless of age.
Mayor Hankner replied it needs clarification-
Motion/Second: Blanchard/Paone to table this item.
Motion Carried
5 ayes 0 nays
Alice Frits, 8072 Long Lake Road. stated with the
21. Consideration
of Staff Memo
new libraryt bike safety and training will be even
Regarding Bike
more important.
Safety Programs
Mr. Brager reported that Staff recommends the City,
in spring of
p
1990
in conjunction with the school system, offer a
the City's two
bicycle safety training class at
elementary schools.
Councilmember Blanchard asked that people realize
adults ride
bike riders are not just children, and
the rules also.
them and need to be aware of
Motion/Second: Paone/wuori to direct Staff to
puttingtogethertogether a bicycle training program
a joint
with the elementary schools in the area, as
Park and Rec Departments,
effort with the Police and
and further investigate adult safety.
Motion Carried
5 ayes 0 nays
Debbie Jones, no address given, stated she had parti-
cipated in bicycle rodeos in other communities and
found them to be very helpful.
Police Chief Ramacher explained the City cannot
begin requiring licensing of bikes on a citywide
level, that it can only be required on a State level.
Park and Rec Director Saarion reviewed the programs
that have been offered in the past.
Mounds View City Council September 25, 1989
Regular Meeting U�IN P
, � 1N A Page Eight
------------------------- --,-,--------
Mr. Mielke stated he felt it was important to get
bike riders on the right side of the road, as well
as to wear helmets and signal turns.
Mrs. F-its stated she would still like to see a
program that incorporates the laws of the road, as
they need to develop good habits in children now,
as they are the drivers of the future.
Ms. Saarion reviewed the three bids that were re- 22. Consideration
ceived for the Silver View Park water and sewer of Staff Memo
services. Regarding
Award for
Motion/Second: Wuori/Hankner to award the contract Silver View
to Volk Sewer and Water for the installation of a 6" Park Water and
ductile watermain and 4" sewer service at Silver Sewer Service
View Park, in the amount of $24,680.00.
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Ms. Saarion explained a fire hydrant is not included
in this bid,but it could be added now or later.
Mr. Brager reported the pay request by Lametti 6 23. Consideration
Sons has been reviewed by the City Engineer, who of Staff Memo
recommends payment. Regarding Pay
Request by
Motion/Second: Blanchard/quick to approve the par- Lametti S Sons
tial 'Payment request of Lametti s Sons for the public
improvement portion of the Sysco development, in the
amount of $68,986.24, to be charged to account
1480-4121-705.
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Mr. Brager reviewed the status of delinquent 24. Consideration
utility bills and requested that a public hearing of Staff Memo
be set to consider certifying them to Ramsey Regarding
County for collection with next years property tax Delinquent
levy. Utility Bills
Motion/Second: Paone/Blanchard to set a public
hearing g for 7:10 PM on October 23, 1989 to con-
sider certifying delinquent utility accounts.
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Mounds
Regular
Mew City Council UNAPPPI
Regular Meeting n �:-----------------
.,a
September 25, 1989
_ - Page Nine
d
Ms. Hren updated the Council on the
Taco Bell restaurant. The buildingstatus of the
the necessary approvals have been received. 25' Consideration
is complete and
Motion/Second: of Staff Memo
�_• Wuori/Quick to approve Regarding Taco
of a certificate of occupant rTaco the issuance Bell Occupancy
Highway 10. Y for Taco Bell, 2219 of Occupancy
5 ayes 0 nays
Attorney Karney reviewed the history of the bus -
condominium arrangement between Taco Bellnessand
Fried Chicken, which are owned by the same
company. He stated Kentucky
he has not seen Parent
yet and understands it has the final agreement
in the works. He ex not been signed butis
requestin explained Kentucky Fried Chicken is
out, but g additional time to get the agreement
are rbut they
e would like to begin construction worked
g a building permit. now and
Mr. Kerney advised the Council could approve issuing
Citythe building permit, contingent upon them holding the
harmless if y beg
in construction and
y finds the co
ndominium agreement then the
is not acceptable.
r Motio-o=d: panne/Hankner
for Kentuck that the building upon approvalFOfethehcondominiumicken can eagreement, andnentert
.Pon
into a hold harmless gent
Of occupancy and restaurantric agreement, and the certificate
the agreement has been entered into.
be held until
5 ayes 0 nays
Mr. Ramacher asked Council approval of the purchase
Ca a 1989 Blazer, to replace the 1982 unmarked squad
car. The '82 will be traded in and be considered
the down payment, with full payment then due on or
about January 2, 1990. He explained this
budgeted item for 1990. is a
Motion/Second•
Prch
Of the Blazer,tfrom uIk/PaoPolar Chevroletne to approve ,1einuthease amount of $14,490, with $4,490 to be transferred
from the Police budget to the equipment fund.
5 ayes 0 nays
Ms. Searion reported the Silver View Park picnic
shelter committee met earlier in the evening and
approved the specs for the shelter.
13. They hope to
send them out
Opened October on September 29, with bids to be
Motion Carried •
25. Report of
Attorney
Motion Carried
27. Report of
Staff
Members
Motion Carried
Mounds View City Council; Il'13 i�i,��4 APPR,
Regular Meeting
Councilmember Paone left the meeting at 9:28 PM.
Mayor Hankner suggested the Council could call to
order if necessary at the October 16 agenda session,
to take action on the bids received.
Motion/Second: Hankner,/Quick to set the October 16
agenda session as a regular meeting for the purpose
of taking action on bids for the Silver View Park
picnic shelter.
4 ayes 0 nays
Councilmember Quick requested Staff provide infor-
mation on possible sites and costs for a fire
hydrant and drinking fountains for Silver View
Park, at the next agenda session.
Councilmember Paone rejoined the meeting at 9:32 PM.
Councilmember Quick asked that the sign ordinance
be placed on the agenda for review at the next
agenda session.
Councilmember Blanchard reported she had represen-
ted the City at the dedication of the newly
remodeled Fire Station No. 3 in Blaine on September
24, and it is very nice.
Councilmember Paone had no report.
Councilmember Wuori reported she had helped at the
household hazardous waste collection day in New
Brighton on September 23, and it was very
successful.
Mayor Hankner suggested the Council set a time to
discuss the budget, as the Legislature is most
likely going to call to order this Wednesday. The
public hearing is scheduled for October 9, and the
law requires the budget be adopted at the same time.
It was agreed to meet on October 2, at 7:30 PM, prior
to the start of the regular agenda session.
Mayor Hankner reported she had received a phone call
concerning the safety of the decks at Landmark
Estates.
Attorney Karney reviewed the history of the problem
with the decks and pending litigation the City is
involved in now.
September 25, 1989
Page Ten
Motion Carried
28. Report of
Councilmembers:
Councilmember
Quick
Councilmember
Blanchard
Councilmember
Paone
Councilmember
Wuori
Mayor Hankner
4
September 25, 1989
Mounds View City Counci Iq Page Eleven
qpq
-''
Regular Meeting _ ----------------------
--______ ?.�_L 9�.
Mayor Hankner alerted the council that she had re-
ceived a call concerning access to the Knollwood
extension, and a petition may be coming in to the
City.
Mayor Hankner asked that the utility rate study
letter received from Kraus Anderson be directed to
Ric Minetor, if it hadn't already.
29. Report of
Mr. Brayer had no report. Clerk/
Administrator
There being no further business before the Council,
30. Adjournment
the meeting was adjourned by Mayor Hankner at 9:44
PM.
Respectfully submitted,
Donald F. Pauley
Clerk/Administrator
PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA
��_ ;.'".'j 1 1
`� 5 i �✓
Regular Meeting
11, 1989
September
Mounds View City Hall
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2401 Hwy. 10,
Mounds View, MN 55112
TThe Mounds View City
Council was called to order by
1. Call to
Mayor
Hankner at 7:00
PM on Monday, September 11,
Order
1989.
The Pledge of Allegiance was said.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Councilmembers Quick, Paone,
Wuori and Mayor Bankner.
It was noted Councilmember Blanchard was absent.
ALSO PRESENT: City Attorney Karney and Clerk/
Admin— trator Pauley.
Motion/Second: Paone/Wuori to approve the August
28, 989 minutes as presented.
4 ayes 0 nays
Debbie Jones, 7405 Parkview Drive, expressed dis-
satisfaction to the Council concerning plantings
that were put in around the path at Silver View
Park. She explained she had been present at the
agenda session last week where a memo was reviewed
but copies not given out, concerning the placement
of plantings. It was stated the residents were to
have input into the placement. However, she received
a certified letter from Rick wriskey last Thursday,
upon arriving home at the end of the day, stating he
could be contacted Tuesdays or Thursdays only. Her
first opportunity to reach him would then be
tomorrow, September 12, but she arrived home today
to find the plantings already in, and they are not
where she wants them by her property. She stated
the placement of the plantings actually directs
people through her property, and they are only 16"
from the property line whereas she has been told by
a landscape architect they should be 2-31, to allow
for growth.
2. Pledge of
Allegiance
3. Roll Call
4. Approval of
Minutes:
August 28,
1989
Motion Carried
5. Residents
Requests and
Comments from
the Floor
Reunds View City Cuuncil
Regular Meeting ti a• ]tea September'll, Z989
----------------------- _ -
--- ----••_--- Page Two
-----------------'---
Mayor Hankner apologized, stating she wasn't aware the
Plantings were Going in so soon,
Park Director Saarion stated the residents could re— O
to go at any time. The Forester was given the order
to go ahead last Tuesday.
Ms. Jones noted the letter was dated August 29, but
not postmarked until September 6, which is very
deceptive.
Ms. Saarion stated that was in error, and while the
letter was written for the agenda session, the date
should have been updated before it was set out.
Carol Golden, no address given, stated she agreed
with Ms. Jones comments, and she was also very
upset to find the plantings had already gone in.
Mayor Hankner stated the
ted the Council would discuss
situation with Staff, and she directed Ms. Saarion
to call Mr. Wriskey tomorrow and make him aware of
the problem. A resolution should be found and Mr.
Wriskey should come in to the agenda session next
week to meet with the Council.
MotiorySecond•
--�_• Quick/Panne to
approve the consent
agenda, as presented, and waive the reading of
the resolutions.
6' Approval pis
Consent Agenda
4 ayes 0 nays
Motion Carried
Clerk/Administrator Pauley explained this had been
discussed at the last
agenda session. The County
and Staff have discussed
7. Authorize
methods of responding to
the six items stipulated by the Council i .
resolution. their
Mayor to Sign
County Road
n
J
Reconstruction
Mayor Hankner explained the Council's position has
not changed since
Study Report
on Behalf of
the motion was adopted in June,
and resolutions have been
the City
received from the County
in support of the items that Mounds View has raised.
The County has
stated they will be able to construct
the four lanes within the
existing right of way.
The action required by the Council is to sign off
on the study report
completed by the County, with
the contingencies that were discussed
a number of
weeks ago. She noted the County owns the
already, so
property
the City cannot stop them from making the
road four lanes.
I
nN n
Mounds View City Council l U
Regular Meeting A
Motion/Second: Wuori/Quick to authorize the Mayor
to sign the County Road J reconstruction study report
on behalf of the City, contingent upon all the items
contained in the memo of last week and upon written
communication from the County for their participation
in the expedited construction of the 610 project and
other items in that memo.
9 ayes 0 nays
Vince Meyers explained he needs a temporary okay
from the Council to raise racing pigeons in the
City. He is currently living in Mounds View and is
buying a home in the City. He explained there are
eight clubs in the Twin City area and reviewed the
raising and racing of pigeons. He noted other areas
have changed their laws to support this sport, and
he gave a copy of recent legislation in Illinois to
the Clerk/Administrator.
Mayor Hankner explained the City ordinance governing
this area has just been revised, and they did not
anticipate pigeons would be requested at the time
it was done.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley explained the ordinance
currently allows two animals. The Council would
have the option of amending the Code to allow the
raising of more than two animals, and would possibly
require the approval of abutting property owners.
Attorney Karney stated if changes are made, the
abutting property owners should be allowed to give
their input. He added they should look at fowl in
general, not just pigeons. He also advised the
Council is just considering a change and they should
give no hint if the ordinance might be changed,
as that could result in legal liabilities. If they
consider the matter further, a formal public hearing
would be held.
Mr. Meyers stated he had approval of all but one
property owner in the area.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley noted the City has
received one phone call and one letter against
this. He also noted that if the Council adopts an
ordinance change, the Charter allows for a refer-
endum, and this could ultimately be voted down
by the residents.
Mayor Hankner explained the Council must listen
to the majority of the people, and they are looking
at three months minimum for an ordinance change,
with no guarantees.
September 11, 1989
Page Three
Motion Carried
8. Informational
Meeting:
Consideration
of Request of
Vince Meyers
to Raise
Racing Pigeons
at 8380 Spring
Lake Road
Mounds View City Council ? 7. 0
���
September 11, 2989
Page Four
Regular Meeting
--------------- -----,--------------------------------
Lorraine Bonine stated it was her father's house Mr.
Meyers is planning on purchasing, and she asked why
this couldn't be covered under a special use permit.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reviewed the requirements
of the ordinance. He explained kennels with more
than two dogs have specific requirements and he
reviewed them.
Motion/Second: Quick/Paone to have Staff begin
research on this matter and bring a proposal back
to the Council.
Motion Carried
4 ayes 0 nays
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reviewed the purpose of
9. First Reading
Ordinance
the proposed ordinance, which would bring this into
of
474
conformance with State law and the wetlands ordinance.
No.
Motion/Second: Quick/Wuori to have the first
reading of Ordinance No. 474, amerding Chapter 42 of
the Mounds View municipal code entitled "Subdivision
Regulations", and waive the reading.
Motion Carr
4 ayes 0 nays
Councilmember Quick reported the task force has been work-
10. Consideration
ina on this, and plans have been modified to keep the
of Approval
of Silver View
shelter as maintenance free as possible, within cost,
Park Picnic
with long-term flexibility, and so forth.
Shelter Plans
Mayor Hankner explained they are asking for approval
of the concept plan, letting of bids, and giving the
task force authorization to make adjustments to the
plans within the available dollars.
Councilmember Paone stated he was concerned with
what the actual costs will be and what the Lions
Club is paying for. He stated he felt it was
for the construction of the shelter and nothing
else. He added he would not be voting on the
motion, as he is a member of the Lions Club.
Motion/Second: Hankner/Quick to accept the concept
plan from the task force appointed by the Council,
and direct them to complete the drawings to specifi-
cations, let it out for bids, and give them the
authority to make adjustments to the proposed plan
as long as the adjustments are within the available
money.
3 ayes 0 nays 1 abstention Motion Carried
Mounds view City CouncilAPPROVED September 11, 1989
Regular Meeting Page Five
CCouncilmember Paone abstained from the vote.
Mayor Hankner read proposed Resolution No. 2530. 11. Consideration
of Resolution
Motion/Second: Quick/Paone to approve Resolution No. 2530
No. 2530, a resolution of acceptance and commenda-
tion to the Mounds View Lions' Club.
4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Mayor Hankner read proposed Resolution No. 2531. 12. Consideration
of Resolution
Motion/Second: Paone/Nuori to approve Resolution No. 2531
No.2531, a resolution of acceptance and commendation
to the New Brighton Eagle's Club.
4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Clerk/Administrator Pauley requested Council 13. Consideration
approval of the 90 day performance review for of Staff Memo
Audrey Almendinaer, the City's receptionist, to Regarding 90
include a 20C per hour increase. Day Performance
®Review for
Motion/Second: Quick/Hankner to approve a 20C per Receptionist
hour 1-'ncrease in wages for Audrey Almendinger,
retroactive to September 1, 1989.
4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reviewed his memo of
14. Consideration
September 8 concerning the Silver View Park master
of Staff memo
plan phone survey. The cost estimate for 450
Regarding
housing units, with 20 questions, would be approxi-
Silver View
mately $2,000.
Park Master
Plan Phone
There was discussion on other surveys the Council
Survey
would also like done, and the lack of available
funds at this time. Further surveys have been bud-
geted for 1991.
Motion/Second: Hankner/Paone to direct Staff to
further pursue the survey and look at expanding it
and look at other areas, including doing a more
extensive survey, with estimated costs, options for
funding, and so forth.
4 ayes 0 nays
0 Motion Carried
Council i
Mounds View City -- --------------
Regular Meeting ------- --
Rama made a slide presentation#
members of the police
police Chief rounds and
ictures of all their backg 16 members
showing p and reviewing noted 11 of the Mounds
department. City' reside in
duties wolcehdepartment staff
of the p
View•
lained ordinance
necessary P pursuant to the State law
Clerk/Administrator Pauiey exp
No. 473 was
repeal. second
Paone/Wuori to have th473, amend-
Motion/Second: lion of ordinance No.
repealing
�doal code of Mounds View by and
reading an Halls".
ing the munic�ntitled "Public Dance
Chapter 108'
waive the reading•
Councilmember Quick - aye
Councilmember Paone - aye
Councilmember Wuori aye
Mayor Hankner - aye
Attorney Karney had no report -
There were no reports by Staff members.
ick had no report.
Councilmember Qu
noted Councilmember Blanchard was absent w earlier in
It duewas the death of her mother-in-la
the day• nick to direct Staff to
Second: Paone/Q family-
Motion�to the Blanchard
send f
September 11' 1989
Page Six----------
15. Second Quarft
1989 Report
of Police
Chief
4 ayes o nays
Councilmember Paone had no report.
Wuori reminded everyone the Festival
�ill be held September 17, and they
Councilmember turnout•
in the Pa-
k ware hoping for a 9006
report,
Mayor Hankner had no rep
16• Second Reading
and Adoption
of ordinance
No. 473
Motion Carried
17. Report of •
Attorney
18 Reports of
Staff Members
19. Reports of
Councilmembers:
Councilmember
Quick
Motion Carried
Councilmember
paone
Councilmember
Wuori i
Mayor Hanner
September 11, 1989
PageCouncil � ---- -----
Seven
Mounds View City _______________________
Regular Meeting
20. Report of
reported the committee Clerk/
Clerk/Administrator Pau on the of the wetlands Administrator
which has been working ek,Task Force
ll
ordinanceshould
befinished
thial suweLty and it Force
then g will be presented to
by the end of the month• and then reviewed in
the Council on October 21
detail on October 16.
Councilme^�ber Wuori noted there are vacancies on
the EQTF, and it is important that they be filled.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported a set of
9has
demands has been received from tochaveready for
prepared a memo which he hop He requested
eek-
the Council's consideration ecutivewsession, to begin
the CoFMcandschedule
provide Staff with direction.
at 7
Motion' PaonilWuori egito neata7 PMon
session of the Council, to beg
Monday, September Lthetcegularaagenda0
fsession.
and be followed by
4 ayes 0 nays
There being no further business before the
Council. Mayor Hankner adjourned the meeting at
8:37 PM.
Respectfully submitted.
Donald F. Pauley
Clerk/Administrator
Motion carried
P1. Adjournment
i
a
TO: Mayor & Council `"" °2
FROM: Don Brager, Finance Director - Treasurer
DATE: September 19,1989
Subject: Changes To Proposed 1990 Budget
Staff was directed to make the following changes to the
Proposed 1990 budget at the September IS, 1989 Agenda Session:
City1) Increase the Fire Department budget by $4,108 to reflect the
's share of the fire department budget recently negotiated
by the cities of Blaine, Spring Lake Park, and Mounds View.
Account 100-4210-390 Fire Department, Grants f Subsidies was
increased from $154,000 to S154,108 to account for this change.
2) Add $10,00o for a City Survey to be conducted in 1990. This
amount has been budgeted in Account ,
Professional Services.
100-4100-303 Council
Other
3) Add $2n,979 to complete the computerization of City ' amount has been added to Account 100-4190-703 Cit
Equipment IncreasingY Nall. That
thataccount from $7,000 to Y Hall,
None $27,979.
of these changes affects the total amount of the General
those
Fund budget as alo,,nts were previously in the Contingency
Account and o,ere tra,nz-,erred to the various accounts listed
above. Revised budget sheets are attached.
0
00
PROPOSED 1990 GENERAL FUND BUDGET 19-Sep-89
ACTUAL BUDGET 1989 1990 DEPT 1990 TEAM COUNCIL t '90 91)9GET PERCENT OF
1938 1989 ESTIMATED PROPOSED PROPOSED APPROVES TO '89 BUDGET TOTAL
GENERAL GOVERNMENT
City Council
Advisory Commissions
$31,004
S6,a07
$49,159
$9,100
$49,1S9
f9 !00
f43,484
$S6,881
f0
15.711
2.13E
Administration
f93,750
,
599,.72
$99,272
14,006
1109,3114
$2,836
3108,480
10
-68.84%
0.11E
Planning
Elections
$50,024
127,645
153,642
$53,642
157,259
$57,360
SO
SO
9.28t
6.93t
4.06%
2.15t
finance
$106,903
14,820
1104,124
$4,820
1104,124
39,765
$120,798
$8,415
$117,984
10
13.311%
Legal
PUD1ic NorRs
168,903
$81,475
$81,475
181,69'
$0
10
-1.30%
4.41%
3.01%
3.06%
City Nall
f63,eSB
1215,697
,
l69,.60
1284,084
f69,150
$294,084
f81,693
1308,405
f81,814
181,844
1310 421
10
18.74t
18.34%
J.06i
10
9.27%
11.61t
Total General Government
$663,991
175,,836
1754,836
1016,374
1824,724
f0
9.26%
30.85i
PUBLIC SAFETY
P0140e
Fire
Civil Defense
Nuisance Abatement
$728.324
$140.289
129,70a
f8,82S
S764,875
1136,918
f16,303
i9,904
1761788
1136,938
$16,303
$9,909
f821,8J<
1154,000
$15,509
$10,212
f820,194
1154,108
$15,509
$10,226
f0
$O
f0
f0
7.231
12.54%
-4.87t
3.201
30.68%
5.76t
0.58%
0.3826
Total Public Safety
$907,147
$928,025
$924,938
11,004,555
$1,000,037
$0
7.76%
37.401
STREETS AND NI6hNAYS
Maintenance Garage
Streets
532,314
$423,327
181,715
1:63,440
581,116
S!63,440
f100,/59
$260,669
f91,067
$261,322
f0
f0
1110t
-28.102
9.77%
9.773
Total Streets and Highways
$505,641
1445,!56
1445,156
$361,127
1352,389
f0
•20,84t
I3.18t
PARRS AND RECREATION
Recreation
Parks
S125,509
t104,469
1147,78!
3195,313
1147,781
3195,313
$157,025
3225,0B8
1157,212
1112,531
SO
f0
6.38t
-1.42t
S.98t
1.20t
Total Parks and Recreation
$229,973
S343,094
S347,494
1382,113
$349,743
SO
1.942
13.082
OTHER INCREASES 0EC4EAGES1
Contingency
Salary Adjustments
Transfers to Other Fynds
PE031f! S 8et:enznt
SO
SD
f0
St.
S50,000
565,685
i:D,919
4O
SSO,000
$65,635
540,319
SD
t50,000
$71,344
115,302
SO
$50,000
171,126
11 ,302
110,000
so
SO
So
t0
Mot
8.74%
-62.60%
0.00%
1.872
2.67i
0.57%
0.37%
FO'aL GENERAL :Uv,
?2.305,756 3:.-27
715 S2
521„ 2? 1:-700.315
52.673,621
30
1.751
l09.00t
`
CITf OF MOUNDS VIEW
DEPARTMENTAL BUDGET DETAIL - 1990 EXPENDITURES
09/19/89
100.4100 GENERAL FUND
CITY COUNCIL
®1981
1988
1989
1909
DEPARTMENT
TEAM
REQUESTS
COUNCIL
APPROVES
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
BUDGETED
ESTIMATED
REQUESTS
PERSONNEL SERVICES
$13,800
$13,800
S161800
$16,800
f15,800
516,800
f0
f0
010 SALARIES, REGULAR
020 SALARIES, IEMPIPART-TIME
$1,928
$1,971
$1,915
$1,915
$1,990
244
11,990
f0
030 PENSIONS
136
$39
$15,810
$244
$18,959
$244
$18,
fig
f19$244
$0
TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICES
$15,764
MATERIALS + SUPPLIES
SO
so
so
f0
10
s0
s0
SO
1MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES
1
sS, 726
$19,100
$19,100
111,80o
$18,200
SC
i60 50 SUPPLIES, OPERATING7,136
f0
s0
20
f0
f0
no GOOKS + PERIODICALS
s0
$7,436
15,726
$191100
$19,100
$11,800
$18,200
f0
TOTAL MATERIALS + SOPPLIES
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
103 OTHER PRCFE39IONAL SERV
$1,059
$6,600
S0
$0
S4,150o
s0
$S,Otoo
f10,ODo
f5,0sso
f0
f0
341 LEGAL NOTICES
H68
1747
f141
SI,7so
f0
s0
343 PRINTING
$118
s756
SO
$025
$825
$800
s8o0
f0
361 MENBERSnIPS
$314
SD
11,275
$1,275
$2,600
$2,600
s7
361 CONFERENCES
f2,933
$1,183
34,250
14,250
f1,250
f1250
f0
390 6RPNiS + S2310SES
f5,T08
19,468
$11,100
sli,l00
S12,650
f19,650
TOT4L CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
128,90E
$31,004
$49,159
$49,159
$43,484
$56,884
s0
GRAND TOTAL CITY COUNCIL
is
CITY Of MOUNDS VIEW
DEPARTMENTAL BUDGET DETAIL
- 1990 EXPENDITURES
09/19189
100.4120 GENERAL FUND
ADMINISTRATION
ITEM OESCRIP1fON
DEPARTMENT
TEAM
REQUESTS
COUNCIL
APPROVES
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
BUDGETED
ESTIMATED
REQUESTS
PERSONNEL SERVICES
010 SALARIES, REGULAR
$47,144
S49,325
$61,467
$61,467
$76,362
$76,362
SO
Oil OVERIIME, REGULAR
$649
$2
SO
SO
SO
SO
SO
SO
SO
SO
020 SALARIES, TEMPART-TIME
$2,254
S5,239
$25
$5,671
SO
$7,228
SO
S7,228
$9,087
$9,263
SO
030 PEBSIONS
040 GROUP INSURANCE
12,711
$3,716
$5,852
$5,852
$5,340
$5,340
SO
050 WORKERS COMPENSATION
$480
$109
1246
1246
$260
$260
30
10
SO
060 UNEMPLOYMENT COMP
TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICE'
$O
SiR,477
SO
158.848
SO
$74,793
SO
$74,793
SO
$91,049
$91,225
SO
MATERIALS + SUPPLIES
SO
SO
10
10
SO
SO
SO
114 MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES
SO
SO
SO
SO
SO
160 SUPPLIES, OPERATING
210 BOOKS + PERIODICALS
$241
$902
$343
$1,662
$1,579
S1179
$705
$705
SO
TOTAL MATERIALS + SUPPLIES
1!1143
$2,005
11,579
$1,579
$705
$705
SO
CONTRACTUAL SERVICi!so
303 O?HER PACFESSIONAL EERY
$6,449
15,369
$4,450
$4,450
$5,500
$5,500
310 COMMUNIC4TIOMS-TELEPHONE
$22
SO
SO
$500
SO
$500
SO
$2,000
$O
$1,000
SO
SO
342 ADVERTISEMENTS
$2,258
S2 234
$1,606
$3,034
11,000
S1,000
$2,000
32,000
$0
343 PRINTING
361 MEMBERSHIPS
$621
$518
$1,660
$1,660
$625
$625
SO
SO
362 CONFERENCES
S9,641
$2,966
SO
$13,634
SO
$13,640
SO
$13,640
SO
SS,625
SO
$5,625
S0
363 TRAINING
380 MILEAGE
51,500
1!,SOO
S1,650
$1,650
$1,800
$1,800
SO
TOTAL CONTRACTUA: SERVICES
S25169!
S25,711
S22,900
$22,900
$17,550
$16,550
SO
CAPITAL OUTLAY
SO
SO
SO
SO
SO
SO
10
702 BLDG + STFUCTORES
S9,562
S7,1B5
SO
50
SO
SO
SO
703 EQUIPMENT
TOJ% CAPITAL CU%4Y
$7,562
$7,195
SO
SO
10
SO
SO
MISC DISBURSEMENTS
SO
SO
550,000
150,000
$50,000
$50,000
SO
910 CONTINGHCY
97C SALARY AD3USTME4TS
SO
SO
165,625
$65,695
$71,344
$71,426
$O
990 TRANSFERS CUT
Si
SO
$40,919
$40,917
$15,302
$15,302
SC
$O
TOTAL MISC DISBURSE7ENTS
SO
SO
$156,604
$156,604
$136,646
$136,728
GRAND %TA!
554,373
S93,750
$255,876
S255,876
1245,950
$245,208
SO
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEN
DEPARTMENTAL BUDGET
DETAIL - 1990
EXPENDITURES 09/19/89
100-4190 GENERAL FUND
CITY HALL
ITEM DESCRIPTION
1987
1988
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
1989
BUDGETED
1999
ESTIMATED
DEPARTMENT
REQUESTS
TEAM
COUNCIL
PERSONNEL SERVICES
REOUESIS
APPROVES
010 SALARIES, REGULAR
Oil OVERTIME, REGULAR
$15,586
$17,011
f16,9$0
f16,9S2
$16,952
i16,q$0
020 SALARIES, TEMP/PART-TIME
10
fSIS
f0
f0
SO
t0
fp
S0
t0
$O
030 PENSIONS
040 GROUP INSURANCE
$1,772
f1,992
f0
$1,994
t0
$1,994
fS,120
12,483
fS,120
f0
050 WORKERS COMPENSATION
$1,013
f60
$1,103
f1 430
12 430
52,7
12,677
f2,$75
f0
f0
TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICES
fIA,950
1120
$21,232
f68
$21,444
568
$ 75
7
$0
121,444
121,300
$27,49/
f9
MATERIALS :SUPPLIES
ill STATIONERY
COPY MATERIALS
$641
11,98S
$180112
f0
114 hISC OFFICE SUPPLIES
f10,694
tt,]GS
,705
$10,543
,000$650
f2,000
,000$650
12,000
,500
,500
t0
121 SUPPLIES, 5LDGS4G9NDS
SI;7$0
f1,017
11,500
f 10,500
10,500
112,000
f0
123 SUPPLIES, EQUIPMENT
f0
S0
f1,S00
$1,500
51,5to
2,000
f2,000
00
f2,0$0
10
160 SUPPLIES, OPERATING
160 MATERIALS . SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
f.00
115,531
$1,443
SO
$2,500
f0
12,500
SO
S0
f0
118,888
JIl,ISO
f11,1S0
18,000
$18,000
18,000
t18,000
10
$0
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
303 uTHfR PROFESSIONAL SE.9V
J1J0
S0
® 310 COMMUNICATIONS-7ELEPNONE
32! ELECTRICITY
lIi,902
f11,211
S0
f10,2)2
f0
$19,272
$S0,000
$16,612
$50,000
SO
312 nAIVRAL GAS
f10,361
$5,248
$11,109
110,150
f10,1S0
112,600
f16,611
f11,600
J0
330 POSTAGE
17,936
15,J96
17,977
f9,740
19 740
lB4O00
17,000
f0
so
J43 PAINTING
351 JANITOR SE34'ICE
f4,9]9
t4,432
11,500
$5,634
17,500
$5,534
18,500
18,680
19,500
f0
353 REFUSE COLLECIIO!I
S6"91
t
S6,i%
S7,690
11,690
18,690
18,680
$3,690
0
355 CLEANING -TOWEL S RAGS
.b
fJE!
S616
5239
f700
$700
$000
$800
fO
f0
36i MENBERSHIFS
36J TRAINING
S8 121
S8,699
1550
S8,706
$550
$8,706
1550
f5S0
t0
320 MILEAGE
SO
f0
10
f0
$9,300
f0
19,300
SO
401 RENTAL, EQUIPMENT
$128
17'w
f9S686
1500
$500
t500
f0
f0
480 INSURANCE 4 BONDS
511 REP., BLISS 4 GROUNDS
111,143
$64,735
$1,900
f74,700
17,900
54,728
025
$78,728
l
,780
10
S17 REPAIRS, EQUIP'ESi
f5q,I86
f'a'
f4,769
f4,100
f1,700
5,700
fS,7U0
$78,728
J78,728
15,700
fD
TOTAL COMigPCTU?L SE%v!C55
f153,N7
15,193
f135,!01
115,220 $15,220
$175,990
$10,000
$10,000
JO
30
1175,190
f228,685 f229,448
f0
CAD;7AL OUTLAY
701 9L)G 4 51.;WU.RES
10J ECUIPMEYi
7G'aL
f0
$580
f11,692
f29,000 f28,000
f27,500
f7,500
CAPITAL Ou'LAr
552C
f31782
$20.074
1441!00 $44,500
17000
f0
!0
S72,S00 f12,500
$35,479
S3I,500 fJS,ll9
!0
GRAND '21AL CITY HALL
f590,704 f'15,697
• S224,084 118/,UB4
f708,J8S
fJ!O,J21
J7 r
®
CITY OF MOUNDS YHO
100-4210 GENERAL FUND
ITEM DESCRIPTION
COATRACTUAL SERVICES
390 GRANTS + SUBSIDIES
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
GRAND TOTAL PIPE
DEPARTMENTAL BUDGET
DETAIL - 1990
EXPENDITURES
09/19/89
FIRE
•
1987
ACTUAL
1988
ACTUAL
1989
BUDGETED
1989
ESTIMATED
DEPARTMENT
RECUESTS
TEAM
COUNCIL
REDUESTS
40PROVES
1134,702
S134,102
1140,289
1140,289
1136,938
$136,938
$154,000
1154,108
f0
$136,938
1136,938
$154,000
f151,108
$0
1134,702
f1<0,289
1136,938
$136,938
$154,000
$154,108
$0
ITEM 4
MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: City Planner Hren
DATE: September 28, 1989
SUBJECT: MOUNDS VIEW BUSINESS PARK SOUTH PUD REZONING
PLANNING CASE NO. 259-89
Resolution No. 2501 directed City Staff to prepare an ordinance
thdt would rezone the Mounds View Business Park South project to
PUD from B-3. Attached for your consideration is an ordinance
rezoning the subject property as directed.
Should you have any further questions or comments, please feel
free to call me. :2
MMH/BAC
Attachment
ORDINANCE NO. 478
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF MOUNDS VIEW BY
AMENDING CHAPTER 41 ENTITLED, "SPECIFIC REZONINGS"
The Council of the City of Mounds View does hereby ordain:
SECTION I. The Mounds View City Council has taken into
consideration the following items as it relates to the Mounds
View business Park South Project:
1. Relationship to Municipal Comprehensive Plan.
2• The Geographical. area involved.
3. Whether such use will tend to or actually
depreciate the area in which it is proposed.
4. The character of the surrounding area.
5. The demonstrated need for such use.
SECTION II. Pursuant to Chapter 41.23, the Official Mounds
View Zoning Map is hereby amended to reflect the following
rezoning:
Mounds View Business Park South is hereby rezoned from B-31
Highway Commercial District to PUD, Planned Unit
Development:
08-30-23-42-0006
08-30-23-43-0001
08-30-23-43-0013
08-30-23-43-0014
SECTION III. This ordinance shall take effect thirty days
after the date of its publication.
Read by the City Coun
day of 1 1989. cil of the City of Mounds View on the
Read and passed by the City Council of the City of Mounds
Viea on this day of 1989.
ATTEST:
(SEAL)
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney
Clerk -Administrator
M.
C,
t
ITEM 5
MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: City Planner Hren
DATE: September 28, 1989
SUBJECT: PIONEER SCH'WINN DEALERSHIP, 2661 COUNTY ROAD I
PLANNING CASE NO. 278-89
Mr. Richard Wolens has applied for a wetland alteration permit to
build in the wetland buffer zone and also a waiver of the Highway
10 moritorium district requirements to allow for construction in
the moritorium district. The proposed building would accommodate
two separate businesses each with separate entrances into the
building. Mr. Wolens has indicated that the proposed tenant
would sell VCR and other electronic equipment.
The Planning Commission has revieo-�d the request and unanimously
recommended to the City Council approval of the waiver of the
Highway 10 moritorium district requirements and a wetland
alteration permit to build in the buffer zone of the wetland.
The revised site survey with easements was submitted this week,
and therefore, the City Engineer has not had an opportunity to
,- review them. Staff will have his comments available at your
Monday night meeting.
Staff is looking for direction on this request as to the
appropriate resolution to prepare for the public hearing which is
to be held on October 9, 1989.
M2MH / BAC
MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. 266-89
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A MODIFICATION TO THE
MORITORIUM DISTRICT AND WETLAND ALTERATION PERMIT REQUEST BY
PIONEER, SCHWINN, 2261 COUNTY ROAD I, PLANNING CASE NO. 278-89
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the
requested modification of the moritorium district and the wetland
alteration permit to allow the construciton of a Pioneer Schwinn
dealership at 2661 County Road I (PIN #07-30-23-12-10); and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the proposed
development site plans including the building elevations and
determined that the proposal is in conformance with the Zoning
Ordinance; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the
requested modification to the moritorium district and has
determined that it does not meet the intent of the moritorium
district; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has determined that the
applicant has demonstrated a hardship on his property based on
the uniqueness of his property and unique character, that is, the
15 foot Highway 10 frontage; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the
requested wetland alteration permit to allow for development in a
wetland buffer zone; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has determined that the
proposal will not affect the integrity of the Comprehensive Plan
or the City's Zoning Ordinance or this Interim District; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has determined that the
proposal is not consistent with the letter and intent of the
Moritorium Ordinance; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has determined that the
proposal does not affect the health, safety and general welfare
of the City.
M
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning
Commission of the City of Mounds View recommends to the City
Council approval of the requested modification to the moritorium
district and a wetland alteration permit and development site
plan for the proposed Pioneer Schwinn Dealership at 2261 County
Road I, contingent upon the following: to
1. All requirements of the City Engineer as outlined in
two memos, both dated September 13, 1989, are complied
with.
RESOLUTION NO. 266-89
PAGE TWO
2. The proposed changes recommended by the City Forester,
as outlined in a memo dated September 15, 1989, are
complied with.
3. The addition of berming along Mounds View Drive,
submission of a lighting plan and submission of a sign
plan.
4. The developer enter into and sign a development
agreement with the City.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission
directs Staff to forward this resolution to the City Council
prior to approval of the minutes.
Adopted this 20th day of September, 1989.
ATTEST:
(SEAL) Chairman
t
L
City Planner
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
MOUNDS VIEW DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 89-92
PIONEER SCHWINN DEALERSHIP
THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into this day Of
191 by and between the CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW, County of
he first part, hereinafter
Rsmsey, State of Minnesota, party of t
called the "City", and Mr. Richard Wolens
er called the "Developer",
party of the second part, hereinaft
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the Developer, in consideration of as wets
_alteration ermtt and _waiver the Hi hwa 0 Moritoriu
1m
District, Ordinance No. 466
F permits thereof, hereby agrees with the City
and the issuance Of p
to perform all Of the acts required herein and to conform to all
Of the conditions set forth as follows:herein, it shall mean
1. Wherever the word "City" appears
and include the City of Mounds View and also said City's agents
and employees; and wherever the word "Developer' appears herein,
Of its agents and
it shall mean the developer, and any herein,
employees. Wherever the words development site" appear
it shall mean the premises described in the following exhibits:
Exhibit 1. (Site Survey and Legal Description dated
Exhibit 2. (Site Plan Dated
Exhibit 3. (Site Survey)
Rev. 12/02/86
Wherever the words "public improvements" appear herein, it shall
mean any improvement defined under Chapter 26.04, Subdivision 1,
of the Municipal Code, and shall include and not be limited to F
streets, curbs and gutters, sanitary sewer and water
installations, storm water and drainage installations.
2. This document shall be referred to as the "Development
Contract", and said document cannot be transferred or assigned by
the Developer except and with the written permission of the City,
granted pursuant to a resolution of the City Council,
3. All improvements required herein to be performed by the
Developer shall be constructed and paid for by said Developer
pursuant to appropriate permits and approval from any
governmental agency, such approval and any environmental
assessments or environmental impact statements required to be
obtained by and prepared at the expense of said Developer.
4. All public improvements, if any, required to be
constructed by the Developer with such materials and equipment as
required by the City under the direct supervision of the City and
shall be in conformance with any and all regulations in force at
the time of construction, and the City is hereby granted the
right of access to the development site to inspect said
construction at such times as the City may direct.
5. The Develper shall, and hereby does, agree to pay when
due and before the become delinquent, all valid taxes and
assessments, if any, there ever be levied against said
development site or portion thereof.
to
- 2 -
6. The City shall not be under any obligation or responsi-
bility to act as engineer/consultant to the Developer in any
matter related to this Agreement or to any public improvements
required on said site by the City, or to act as inspector and
report to said Developer any defect or failure, hazard or
inadequacy or otherwise relative to said site development; any
actual or implied approval by the City in repsect to any develop-
ment shall not serve either to alter or extinguish or to other-
wise affect the responsibility, obligation or liability of the
Developer in this.
7. The Developer shall not unnecessarily damage or obstruct
or cause any interference with drainage ways or drainage works
located within or adjacent to said development site, or permit
its contractor or other agents to do so.
8. The Developer shall not alter any of the public improve-
ments located on said site except if and as elsewhere herein
provide. or as particularly in each instance authorized in
writing by the City.
9. Surface drainage to be constructed and approved, before
and after construction, by the City Inspection Department, and
before an occupancy permit shall be issued for the expansion
area.
10. All drainage easements required by the City shall be
granted by the Developer, without cost to the City, as required.
11. The Developer agrees to conform to all of the applic-
able requirements of the Mounds View Municipal Code, as amended
from time to time, and particularly Chapters 26, 39, 40, 42, 48,
49, 49A, 59, 60, 61, 62 and 63.
- 3 -
12. The Developer herein agrees pursuant to provisions of
the Mounds View Municipal Code, Chapter 49.07, Subdivision 6, to
Pay, prior to the approval of the permits required, the expenses
incurred by the City in the processing, review and evaluation of
the proposed development and in the inspection of all work
performed pursuant to said contract. Such costs shall include
but not be limited to the administrative, legal, and engineering
expenses incurred herein, and such other expenses as authorized
by said Chapter.
13. The Developer agrees that the City can terminate
development of the development site or the Construction of any
buidling structures thereon if in the City Council's opinion the
terms of this Development Contract have not been conformed to by
the Developer and the said Developer herein agrees to cease
construction and waives its right of recourse, claim, suit or
action against the City. In addition, in the event the Developer
fails to conform to the conditions of this Agreement, the City
shall be entitled to enforce it pursuant to the terms of this
contract and/or the provisions of the Mounds View Home Rule
Charter, Chapter 26 of the Municipal Code, or applicable
Minnesota Statutes. The Developer herein agrees that in the
event the City is compelled to enforce any of the provisions of
this Contract by court action and judgment is rendered in favor
of the City, that all costs, disbursements and reasonable
attorney's fees will be paid by said Developer, its heirs,
successors and assigns.
14. The Developer shall furnish to the City at the time of
the execution of this Contract a cash bond, a corporate surety
- 4 -
bond, an irrevocable letter of credit or any other negotiable
instrument approved by the City Attorney, which the Developer
agrees to keep in full force and effect during the term of the
obligation created herein in the amount of
Dollars, wherein the
City shall be the obligee for the use of the City to guarantee
performance by the Developer of all of the terms and conditions
of this Contract, in conformance with its terms, and in addition,
Upon the Developer conforming to the rules, regulations, statutes
and ordinances of the City and the Developer agrees that it shall
hold the City harmless from all costs and charges and damages
that may occur on account of doing of the work specified and for
the enforcing of the terms of this Contract or bond, if action is
brought hereon, including reasonable attorney's fees, in any case
r where such action is successfully maintained and for the
compliance with the laws appertaining thereto, wherein the bond
shall be void, but otherwise shall remain in full force and
effect.
15. It is understood and hereby agreed by and between the
parties hereto that any plans or data supplied by the City within
or adjacent to said development site are approximations only and
that the City explicitly does not pretend or guarantee or warrant
any such plans or date to be either complete or correct.
16. The Developer shall not unnecessarily create, cause or
suffer to exist or to continue to exist, any nuisance or hazard
to persons or property within or adjacent to said site by reason
of said public improvements, development of the site or other
eoperations in respect thereof or permit its agents, engineers or
contractors to do so.
M.'M
17. When applicable, three complete sets of plans and
specifications or directions for any public improvement to be
constructed on said site, each bearing the certificate and seal
n
of a professional engineer duly registered in the State of
Minnesota, shall be submitted to the City well in advance of the
time proposed for commencing construction thereof. The City
shall have a period of not less than thirty (30) days in which to
examine and review the plans and specifications submtited by the
Developer and to reply to the Developer with respect to the
adequacy or inadequacy of the plans and specifications. Upon
final approval of the plans and specifications and within a
reasonable time following completion of the installation, the
Developer shall furnish and deliver three sets of "as built"
plans thereof to the City. If any public improvements are to be
constructed on said site by the City, the necessary easements and
right-of-ways shall be granted to the City at the expense of the
Developer including the costs of the preparation of the
nigh -of -way documents and filing. The Developer further agrees
to grant to the City any easements or right-of-ways required
over, under and across the development site, at no cost to the
City, for the maintenance and accessibility to any public
improvement constructed on the development site. The Developer
shall establish permanent reference marks, to the approval of the
City, in convenient and readily accessible locations wherever
said public improvements are constructed on the development site.
18. In the case of a multiple dwelling, commercial or
industrial development or any use combining any of the aforesaid
uses, the Developer agrees on behalf of itself, its heirs,
successors or assigns to permanently maintain the site described
herein pursuant to the terms of th;e
agreements subsequently entered into, and said Developer shall
not permit the premises to deteriorate or become blighted or to
constitute a public nuisance, and shall not permit its users or
occupants to create a public nuisance. Enforcement of this
provision shall be pursuant to the terms of this contract or the
provisions of the applicable Minnesota Statutes, the Mounds View
Home Rule Charter, and the Municipal Code. In the event of
nonconformance by the Developer, the City shall seek mandatory
relief, after written notice of the alleged violations, pursuant
F`5
to the terms of this Contract to enforce this provision and may
proceed to abate public nuisances and to assess the cost of said
r
a-
abatement, including all costs, disbursements, legal fees against
the development site, as provided for in the Home Rule Charter,
Chapter 26 of the Municipal Code, and such other applicable
ordinances and Minnesota Statutes.
19. The development site shall be developed as indicated on
the attached site plan, referred to as Exhibit 2. The site plan
and the development to be constructed thereon may be amended from
time to time by the mutual written consent of the parties hereto,
in conformance with the Municipal Code of the City.
20. In addition to all of the provisions recited herein -
before, the Developer agrees to the following conditions as more
fu11y set out in Attachment A attached hereto and made a part
hereof.
21. The provisions of this contract are severable, and in
the event that any provision of this agreement if found invalid,
the remaining provisions shall remain in full force and effect.
- 7 -
This agreement is made and executed purusant to and under �q
authority of Resolution No. adopted by the City the t
day of , 1989, and by resolution or authorized
signature of the Developer.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed these
presents the day and year first above written.
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
By
Its Mayor
By
Its Clerk-Administrtor
DEVELOPER:
By
Its President
By
Its
Approved as to form and the excecution
this day of , 1989:
City Attorney
•
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
COUNTY OF )
ss.
On this day of
appeared 19 before me
Clerk-Admini� and
Count y, of the Cxt the Mayor and
y of Ramsey, State of Minnesota, a municipal corporation;
that the seal affixed to the Mounds View,
foregoing instrument is the
corporate seal of the corporation, and that the said instrument
was executed on behalf of the corporation by authority of its
council, and that they acknowledge said instrument to be the free
act and deed of the corporation.
CORPORATE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
FOR DEVELOPMENT
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
COUNTY OF ) ss.
On this day of
appeared an��' 19_, before me
that the seal affixedato the fore oin o`
corporate seal of the corporation, and thatrthe nsaid oithe
nstrument
wasrd executed on t is
behalf of the corporation by authority of its
be atheofreeractoand deedthat
thecorporation.
they
said instrument to
INDIVIDUAL ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
FOR DEVELOPER
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
COUNTY OF ) ss.
On this day of
appeared —�_, 19 before me
to
be the persons described herein and'alsomwho eexecuted thewn to
foregoing Development Contract and acknowleged that h
executed the same as
free act and deed. '— —
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 89-92
EXHIBIT lA
In adaition to the foregoing conditions, the Developer agrees to
the following:
1. The Developer shall be responsible for the maintenance
of landscaping oil the site in the same or similar
condition as approved in the 'development site' plans as
outlined on page one (1) of this Development Agreement.
FOR THE CITY:
Dare:
FOR THE DEVELOPER:
Date:
11
Fl
1
MEMO TO: Mayor and CityITEM 6
Council
FROM: City Planner Hren
I
DATE: September 28, 1989 •'
a
SUBJECT: MOUNDS VIEW SQUARE - HARDEES 1
PLANNING CASE NO. 276-89 III
Paster Enterprises has applied for a rezoning
a
theif site from B-4 to B-3 to allow for the
convenience food restaurant g °' a Portion of
applied for a on the addition of a
conditional site. The applicant has
convenience food restaurant use Permit for the also
permit/planned unit develo facilIt drive -through
US -
another Y and a conditional use Principal buildingPment to allow for the addition of
approve of the rezoning on the site. Should the City
View Square site, the grfor the Hardees Y Council
requirements With proposed site Portion of the Mounds
Because h the exception of ap34n meets all minimum zoning
site, thehCityphasathehos applied for a CUP/Puarkinp forcehshortage
Parkin as part of the flexibilitortun y to allow for the reduction In
Y designed into the PUD.
Subsequent to the Planning Commission meeting submitted a revised landscaping plan based
Commission's concerns that g' the applicant has
the north the landsca in on the Planning
forwarded north
sideto f the site. This landscaping not adequate on
City Forester for his P g Plan will be
The Planningcomments.
ission has
meetings and has mrecommended tolthedCt the
re
approval of the quest at two separate
Portion Proposed rezonin Y Council unanimous
conveniencecfoodireste and
antonditiionalmuse4 to B-3 for the
permit for the Hardees
CUP/PUD for entire Mounds lawSquaredrivh
Commission will be g facilities and a
October 4th to consitler theg the plans again ate Planning
stages of the Cup/ pUD development stage andfinal
meeting on
final plan
Staff is looking for direction on this request as to the
appropriate resolution and/or ordinance t
hearing which is to be held on October
Of Hardees o Prepare for the public
available foPaster Enterprises and Benshoof989. Representatives
questions re Your meeting on October 2nd shouldsociates will be
regarding the Proposal. You have any
MMH/BAC
11
MEMO TO: MICHELLE HREN, CITY PLANNER
FROM: RICK WRISKEY, CITY FORESTER
DATE: SEPTEMBER 28, 1989
SUBJECT: LANDSCAPING - HARDEES AT MOUNDS VIEW SQUARE
The addition of an evergreen headlight block to the north is a good idea.
These particular plantings will have to be evaluated after the first year of
operation to make sure its doing what was intended.
I still think that the parking islands could use some vertical relief in the
form of shade trees. I don't feel that shrubs of the variety planned will
hold up to snow plowing or people pressure.
RW/SL
M
0
10
MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: City Planner Hren
DATE: September 28, 1989
SUBJECT: MOUNDS VIEW SQUARE SHOPPING CENTER
Please find attached a letter to Paster Enterprises from the City
of Mounds View regarding the payment for the lawn sprinkler
system that was damaged during the reconstruction of County Road
I. According to the letter, the agreement is now null and void
because the repairs for the sprinkler system have been paid for
and the additional right-of-way has been granted to the City and
Ramsey County.
Should you have any further questions regarding this matter,
please feel free to contact me.
MMH/BAC
Attachment
7
C►¢ of Ivor g iew
RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA
2401 HIGHWAY 10
MOUNDS V IEW, MINN. 55,12
75�]055
October 26, 1988
Ms. Lisa A. Yarbrough
Construction Administrator
Paster Enterprises
2227 University Avenue
St. Paul, Minnesota 55114
RE: Mounds View Square Lawn
Sprinkler Repair
Dear Ms. Yarbrough:
Enclosed please find a check from the City of Mounds View in
the amount of $3,290.18 for the repair of the lawn sprinkler
system which was damaged during the reconstruction of County
Road I.
With receipt of this check, the City of Mounds View has
fulfilled all of its obligations in relation to our
agreement whereby 'Paster Enterprises provided the City and
Ramsey County with additional right-of-way,. We appreciate
the cooperation and assistance of Paster Enterprises in
helping the City of Mounds View and Ramsey County
reconstruct County Road I in a manner which we feel is
beneficial to all of the residents of Mounds View and of
sicnificant be efit to the adjacent property owners.
Ver�ruly you
r's
CI
ni
DFP/MJS
ITEM 6
MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: City Planner Hren
DATE: September 28, 1989
SUBJECT: MOUNDS VIEW SQUARE - HARDEES
PLANNING CASE No. 276-89
Please find attached a memo from Administrative Secretary Michele
Severson to myself regarding carnival licenses, health fairs and
Christmas tree sales as they relate to the Mounds View Square
shopping center.
The Planning Commission discussed Paster Enterprises' proposal
for the Hardees Restaurant and an issue that was raised was the
carnivals, health fairs and Christmas tree sales. The Planning
Commission questioned whether it was appropriate to continue
allowing these types of activities should the Hardees be
constructed on the site. The City Code addresses carnivals and
Christmas tree sales in Chapters 110 and 116, both are attached
for your review. These are the only criteria that an individual
would have to meet in order to allow such use provided they have
approval by the property owner. The Zoning Code does not address
temporary uses and as such, does not regulate or evaluate
proposals such as carnivals, health fairs and Christmas tree
sales.
If you have any futher questions on this matter, please feel free
to call myself or Administrative Secretary Michele Severson.
MMH/BAC
060
MEMO TO: CITY PLANNER
FROM: ADMINISTRATIVE SECRETARY MICHELE SEVERSON
DATE: SEPTEMBER 27, 1989
SUBJECT: CARNIVAL LICENSE/HEALTH FAIRS/XMAS TREE SALES
CARNIVALS
Carnivals need a license in the City of Mounds View. There
are several steps in obtaining a carnival license which you
will find in Chapter 116 of the Municipal Code entitled,
"ITENERANT AMUSEMENT RIDES, CARNIVALS AND CIRCUSES", copy
attached.
As far as review and approval of the license Chapter 116.02,
Subdivision 2. Review and Approval reads as follows11 witThe
regards to granting or refusing to grant a license,
Council may require a public hearing on the application, and
such hearing shall be held at such time and upon such notice
as
the ourantmay
thedetermine.
afterThe
consdierationgofnther re tg
refuse to
license."
Under Section 116.02, Subdivision 3. Conditions allows
the Council to make certain limitations or restrictions on
the licensee as they deem necessary. See below:
"The Council may impose any conditions or restrictions
it deems necessary or advisable in the public interest,
including but not limited to conditions relating to the
hours of operation, the outside lighting of the
premises, and parking facility. The Council also may
reserve the right to impose any conditions or
restrictions at any time after the issuance of a license
hereunder. A bond may be required in such form and
amount as specified by the Council to guarantee
compliance with such conditions as shall herein
imposed."
HEALTH FAIRS: I have not dealt with any health fairs in the
Citv of Mounds View.
CHRISTMAS TREE SALES: Christmas Tree Sales falls under
Chapter 110, Subdivision 3. Transient Merchants of the
Mounds View Municipal Code. See Section 110.12 Revocation
of License, Subdivision 1. with regard to revocation of
license.
I hope the above adequately answers your questions, if not
please feel free to contact me.
/MJS
116.01
CHAPTER 116
( ( ITINERANT AMUSEMENT RIDES, CARNIVALS, CIRCUSES
116.01 License Required. No person, firm or corporation
shall. operate, maintain, or exhibit any itinerant amusement
rides, carnival or circus within the municipality without first
obtaining a license as provided in this chapter.
116.02 Application and Issuance.
Subdivision 1. Application. An application for such
license shall be made in writing to the Clerk -Administrator and
shall state the full name and address of the applicant, the loca-
tion where the amusement rides, carnival or circus is to be
conducted, the owner of the premises, and such other information
as shall be required by the Clerk -Administrator.
Subdivision 2. Review and Approval. The Clerk -Adminis-
trator shall verify the information supplied in the application
and conduct such investigation as required by the Council of the
applicant, proposed activities, and premises. The Council shall
require review and recommendation from the Fire Inspector and
Police Chief before the license is granted. The Council may
require a public hearing on the application, and such hearing
shall be held at such time and upon such notice as the Council
( may determine. The Council may grant or refuse to grant the
license after consideration of the application.
Subdivision 3. Conditions. The Council may impose any
conditions or restrictions it deems necessary or advisable in the
public interest, including but not limited to conditions relating
to the hours of operation, the outside lighting of the premises,
and parking facility. The Council may also reserve the right to
impose any conditions or restrictions at any time after the
issuance of a license hereunder. A bond may be required in such
form and amount as specified by the Council to guarantee com-
pliance with such conditions as shall be herein imposed.
116.03 License Fees. The fee for every such license
shall be established by resolution of the City Council and shall
be paid at the time application is submitted to the Clerk -
Administrator. If the Council denies an application for license,
the Clerk -Administrator shall refund the license fee after de-
ducting $25.00 for the costs of processing the application.
116.04 Insurance.
(1) The licensee shall obtain and keep in full force and
effect proper insurance coverage to protect the municipality and
said licensee against any liability for personal injury or
116.04
propert%, jamage sustained by any persons as a result of the
oper,.cion of said amusement rides, carnival or circus. Said
insurance coverage shall provide protection against liability up
to a sum of at leant $50,000 per property damage and $100,000/
$390,000 for personal injury.
(2) Said licensees shall obtain and keep in full force
and effect proper insurance coverage against any liability for
injury sustained by any persons operating said licensed activi-
ties as required under provisions of the Workmen's Compensation
Act of the State of Minnesota.
(3) Said licensee shall submit to the Clerk -Administrator
satisfactory certificates of insurance for the coverage required
above.
116.05 Indemnification. The licensee shall indemnify and
hold harmless the municipality and the Council from any liability
in whatsoever manner arising which may be incurred by the licen-
see and the municipality as the result of the operation of
amusement rides, carnivals or circuses.
116.06 0 eP ration.
(1) Any operator or owner of licensed amusenent rides,
carnivals or circuses regulated hereunder shall conduct said
operations and premises in conformance with all laws and regula-
tions of the State of Minnesota. He shall not permit any intoxi-
cating liquor or any immoral conduct or practices on said
premises.
(2) Any said operator or owner shall control traffic en-
tering and leaving said premises so that it does not interfere
with the orderly flow of traffic on the public streets adjacent
thereto.
(3) The Council shall establish such conditions as it
deems appropriate to assure cleaning of the premises and all
other properties within a reasonable period after the event and
may require a bond to assure such.
116.07 Penalty. Any person, firm or corporation which
shall violate any provision of this chapter shall be guilty of a
misdemeanor. (257)
0
110.01
CHAPTER 110
PEDDLERS, SOLICITORS, AND TRANSIENT MERCHANTS
110.01 Definitions.
Subdivision I. "Peddler" means any person,
not,oWhether
from house
resident of the City of Ms vieor fror streetht ges street, convey -
to house, from place to place
ing or transporting goods, wares or merchandise or offering or
exposing the same for sale, or making sales and delivering
articles to purchasers. It does not include vendors of milk,
bakery to regular dcustomers groceries onestablishedh outesribute their products
Subdivision 2. "Solicitor" means any person, whether a
resident of the City of Mounds View or not, who goes from house
to house, from place to place, or from street to street, solicit-
ing or taking or attempting to take orders for sale oods,or
wares or merchandise, including magazines, books, periodicals,
personal property of aerformnature
inhthe atE future, whether or;oever for future lnot rsuch
or for service to be p payments on such
order or whether or not he is collecting advance for himself, or
order. Such definition includes any person who,
uses
for another person, firm or corporation, hires,
structuretentr
occupies any building, motor vehicle, trailer,
railroad boxcar, boat, hotel room, lodging house, apartment,
shop, or other place within the City for the purpose of exhibit-
ing samples or taking orders for future delivery•
Subdivision 3. "Transient Merchant" includes any Oerson,
firm or corporation,
whether as owner, agent,consignee,
View or not
employee, whether a residena oftsellin9unds and delivering ,
who engages in a temporary business
goods, wares or such
Purposesse ,ithin the hires, leases, who, in occupies any
furtherance of such Purposes,
building, structure, motor vehicle, tranlehousese,apartmenrailroad
ts,othe
car, boat, public room in hotels, lodging
exhibition and sale of such goods, waresrovidd that merc
such adefinition
her,
privately or at public auction, p
firm
odoesr crnota tion who, while
does not include any person, fisell from stock, but
occupying such temporary
exhibits samples for the purpose of securing orders for future
delivery only. The person, firm or corporation so engaged is re-
lieved from complying with the provisions of this ordinance
merely by reason of associating temporarily with any local
chant, or auctioneer, or by conducting such
dealer, trader, mer
in connection with, as a part of, or in the
transient business trader, merchant, or auctioneer.
name of any local dealer,
110.02
110.02 Permit Required. It is unlawful for any peddler,
( solicitor or transiene t merchant to engage in any such business
within the City of Mounds View without first obtaining a permit
therefor in compliance with the provisions of this chapter.
110.03 Exemptions. The terms of this chapter do not
include the acts of persons selling personal property at whole-
sale to dealers in such articles, not to newsboys, nor to the
acts of merchants or their employees in delivering goods in the
regular course of business. Nothing contained in this chapter
prohibits any sale required by statute or by order of any court,
or orevents any person conducting a bona fide auction sale pur-
suant to law.
110.04 Application. Applicants for a permit under this
chapter shall file'�with the Clerk -Administrator a sworn applica-
tion in writing on a form to be furnished by the Clerk -
Administrator. The application shall give the following
information:
a) Name and physical description of applicant;
b) Complete permanent home and local address of the
applicant and, in the case of transient merchants,
the local adddress from which proposed sales will be
made;
c) A brief description of the nature of the business and
the goods to be sold,
d) The name and address of the employer, principal or
supplier of the applicant, together with credentials
therefrom establishing the exact relationship;
e) The length of time for which the right to do business
is desired;
f) The source of supply of the goods or property pro-
posed to be sold, or orders taken for the sale
thereof, where such goods or products are located at
the time said application is filed, and the proposed
method of delivery;
g) A recent photograph of the applicant which
cpicturand
shall be approximately 2" by g he
head shoulders of the applicant in a clear and distin-
guishing manner,
4
110.04
propertyowners of Ramsey
h) The names of at least two11crtify as to the
(� Minnesota, ectabi-
applic, good character and business nces such
applicant's 9 the names of references,
lity, or, in lieu of good character and
of the applicant as will en -
other available evidence as to the g
business responsibility ly evaluate such
able an investigator toproper nsibility;
character and business responsibility'
applicant has
crime, misdemeanor, or viola-
i) A statement as to whether or not the
been convicted of any traffic
of any municipal ordinance, other than traffic
, tre nature of the offense and the punish -
Violations
ment or penalty assessed therefor,
municipalities, not to exceed three, where
j) The last
reced-
the applicant carried on busthesaddressestfrom ely pwhich
ing date of application
in those municipalities.
such business was conducted - r,amotion.
110.0� R'liQious and CharitableoCLcorporation desiring to
Sc,cl� association donations of
Any organization,cited in kind or desir-
solicit or to have rlfinancial stance any than
money or property, item of literature or merchandise
distribute any from persons other
ing to sell or or solicited
for which a fee is charged the streets,o ni�fpublicr
members of such organizations upon
house-to-h3 patriotic, or philanthropic
business buildings, by ious, P Section 110.04 of
places for a charitable fromlthe provisions of lication in writ -
purpose shall be exemp sworn aPP,
this chapterP Clerk -Administrator which
provided there is filed a
ing on a form to be furnished
shall give the following permit is
a) Name and purpose of the cause for which the
sought;
b) Names and addresses of the officers and directors o
the organization;
c) Period during which solicitation. is to be carried on;
d) whether or not any commission, fee, wages or emolu-
ith such
ments are to be expended in connection w
solicitation and the amount thereof.
110.05
association or
organization, hilanthro-
satisfied that such charitable, patriotic or P permit
Upon being religious, issue a
oration is a association or corporation
corporation
, the Clerk -Administrator association
Pic organization such organization, association olepre-
without charge to Such organization, a ents$ or
members, 9 writing stating
to solicit
shall furthe nish all of it credentials in
corporation solicitation of agent and purpose of
sentatives ctheuor9anization, name
the name
of solicitation-
Investi ation and Issuance. it shall
110.06 applications insti-
on receipt of each PP
Subdivision 1• Up police, who shall immediately moral
Chief of
applicant's business and public
be referred to theof the protection of the
tute such investigationin the manner prescribed
he deems necessarbeen filed by the
character as endorse the application.
good and shall within 72 hours after t has
in this section Clerk -Administrator• the
with the such investigation,
applicant to be
as a result of is found
onsibility such appli-
Subdivision 2. Ifasresp and return
applicant's character or police shall endorse on
the Chief of reasons for the same, notify the
unsatisfactory, royal and his who shall eimit
cation his diont is disapproved and that no p
the application to the Clerkon is istra o F
applicant that his application �+
a result of such investigation, the
will be issued. are found
responsibility of the applicant the
Subdivision 3. If as endorse on
and business resp police shall en
to the
character Chief of the aPP
to be satisfactory,roval and return the applicant his per"
application his aPP shall deliver to issuing
the signature of the h of said
Clerk -Administrator, shall address, and photograP oods
mit. Such permit shall contain the kinds of g
officer and shall show the name, that the same shall
the permit issued and identifying
the class °fthe date of issuance
permittee, Each
to be sold theasuWelllas the permit numbiicensedtbusineseisonal
be operative,f any vehicle used in such
tion o time by any person
description or transient mechant must secure diersonrator
minis
peddler, issued at any fhe Clerk -A
No permit shall belt is issued•
permitthan the one to whom all permits issued•
other ermanent record of NO permittee,
shall keep a p eakin Devices•
and S cry out, blow a horn,
110.07 Loud Noises shall shout' cry upon any of the
is behalf, Lf ing or upon
nor any person in his sound amp y. laces of the City
a bell, or use other public p roducted
ring alleys, parks or volume is emitted the streets,
streets, where sound of sufficientla. ly heard uPOI
for the Purpose
premises a capable of being public places, which
therefromato lleys, parks, or other public or merchandise
attention to any 9O°ds,
avenues, sell•
of attracting proposes
to
such licensee pr°P
110.08
110.08 Use of Streets. No permittee shall have any
exclusive right to any location in the public streets, nor shall
any be permitted a stationary location thereon, nor shall any be
permitted to operate in a congested area where such operation
might impede or inconvenience the public use of such streets.
For the purpose of this chapter, the judgment of a police
officer, exercised in good faith, shall be deemed conclusive as
to whether the areas is congested and the public impeded or
inconvenienced.
110.09 Exhibition of Permit. Permittees are required to
exhibit their perm t at the request of any citizen.
110.10 Duty of Police to Enforce. It shall be the duty
of the police of the City of Mounds view to require any person
seen peddling, soliciting or canvassing and who is not known by
such officer to have obtained a permit hereunder to produce his
permit and to enforce the provisions of this chapter against any
person found to be violating the same.
110.11 Records. The Chief of Police shall report to the
Clerk -Administrator all convictions for violation of this chapter
and the Clerk -Administrator shall maintan a record for each
permit issued and record the reports of violation therein.
110.12 Revocation of License.
Subdiviion 1. Permits issued under the provisions.of this
chapter may be revoked by the Council of the City of Mounds View
after notice and hearing, for any of the following causes:
1) Fraud, misrepresentation, or incorrect statement
contained in the application for permit;
2) Fraud, misrepresentation or incorrect statement made
in the course of carrying on his business as soli-
citor, canvasser, peddler, transient merchant,
itinerant merchant or itinerant vendor;
3) Any violation of the chapter:
4) Conviction of any crime or misdemeanor;
5) Conducting the business of peddler, canvasser, soli-
citor, transient merchant, itinerant merchant, or
itinerant vendor, as the case may be, in an unlawful
manner or in such a manner as to constitute a breach
of peace or to constitute a menace to health, safety
or general welfare of the public.
110.12
Subdivision 2. Notice of the hearing for revocation of a •
permit shall be given by the Clerk -Administrator in writing,
setting forth specifically the grounds of complaint and the time
and place of hearing. Such notice shall be mailed, postage
prepaid, to the permittee at his last known address at least five
days prior to the date set for hearing or shall be delivered by a
police officer in the same manner as a s9mmons at least three
days prior to the date set for hearing.
110.13 Appeal. Any person aggrieved by the action of the
Chief of Police or the Clerk -Administrator in the denial of a
permit as provided in Section 110.16 of this chapter may appeal
to the Council. Such appeal shall be taken by filing with the
Council within fourteen days after notice of the action
complained of, a written statement setting forth fully the
grounds for the appeal. The Council shall set a time and place
for a hearing on such appeal, and notice of such hearing shall be
given to the appellant in the same manner as provided in Section
110.12 of this chapter for notice of hearing on revocation.
110.14 Reapplication. No permittee whose permit has been
revoked shall make further application until at least six months
have elapsed since the last previous revocation.
110.15 Expiration of Permit. All annual permits issued
under the provisions of this chapter shall expire at midnight the
31st day of December in the year when issued. Other than annual
licenses shall expire at midnight on the date specified in the
license.
110.16 License Fees. The fee for every such license
shall be established by the resolution of the City Council.
110.17 Penalt . Any person who violates any provision of
this ordinance is guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction
thereof shall be punished by a fine not exceeding $500 or by
imprisonment for a period not exceeding 90 days or both, plus, in
either case, the costs of prosecution.
0
f
MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. 265-89
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL/DENIAL OF MOUNDS VIEW
SQUARE PROPOSED REZONING, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/PLANNED
UNIT DEVELOPMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A HARDEE'S
CONVENIENCE FOOD RESTAURANT, PLANNING CASE NO. 276-89
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the
requested rezoning from B-4 to B-3 Conditional Use
Permit/Planned Unit Development and Conditional Use Permit
for the convenience food restaurant to be located at the
Mounds View Square Shopping Center site (PIN 07-30-23-
11-O001).
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the
proposed rezoning request as a separate issue from the site
development plans, and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the
criteria for all proposed rezonings; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has determined that
the proposed rezoning is/is not in conformance with the
Comprehensive Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has determined that
the proposed rezoning will/will not have an impact on the
surrounding properties, and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the
geographical area involved; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has determined the
proposed use will/will not tend to or actually depreciate
the area in which it is proposed; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has taken into
consideration the character of the surrounding area; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has determined
that the applicant has/has not demonstrated a need for such
use; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the
requested Conditional Use Permit/Planned Unit Development to
allow for the addition of another principal building on this
site; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has also revie::cd
the Conditional Use Permit for the convenience food
restaurant and the proposed development site plans
associated with the new structure; and
ti-
RESOLUTION NO. 265-89
PAGE TWO
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has also reviewed
the Conditional Use Permit for the convenience food
restaurant with drive -through facilities and the proposed
development site plans associated With the new structure;
and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed
the
parking and circulation for the entire Mounds View Square
Center site and has determined that the site plan provides
503 parking spaces when 537 parking spaces are required for
a shortage of 34 parking spaces; and
WHEREAS the Planning Commission has determined that
they approve of waiving of the installation of 34 additional
parking stalls as permitted with a CUP/PUD district; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the
traffic and parking study done by Benshoof and Associates;
and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the
and parking
City Engineer's memo regarding the traffic
study; and
�J
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission is in
Benshoof's traffic
agreement with the City Engineer's and
and parking study; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the
September 15th and
City Forester's recommendations dated
and
agrees with the proposed recommendations;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the
the City
proposed sign request which is in conformance with
it is acceptable.
sign code and determines that
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning
approval of the
Commission recommends to the City Council
B-3, the conceptual
requested rezoning from B-4 to
Permit/Planned Unit Development and the
Conditional Use
Conditional Use Permit for the convenience food restaurant
with drive -through facilities contingent upon:
1. The developer enter into and sign a development
agreement with the City.
se as a result
cessive
2 be
outdoor menu
ofere theshall drivenot
tthroughxrestaurantti
board.
3. All requirements of the City Forester dated
September 15, 1989 are complied with.
p
RESOLUTION NO. 265-89
PAGE THREE
4. Requirements of the City Engineer outlined in
two memos both dated September 13, 1989 are
complied with.
5. After an operational period of one year, the
hours of operation will be subject to review.QN
6. A permit from the Minnesota Department of
Transportation is obtained for the land-
scaping shown on the state highway property.
7. The site is maintained.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission
directs staff to forward this recommendation to the City
Council prior to the approval of the minutes.
Adopted this 20th day of September, 1989. I
ATTEST:
Chairm— an
C(SEAL)
City Planner
11
J0 -
MEMORANDUM
Al'I'L., 7
Memo To :Mayor and City Council Members
From :Ric Minetor, City Engineer/Director o� Works
Date :September 18, 1989
Subject :Intermittent Lead Man Proposal
Discussion with Employees and Union Representative
Council and Staff began discussing alternatives to the existing
maintenance service in an effort to improve the delivery of
maintenance services in City Parks and other areas of concern.
The initial step was establishing maintenance standards for
various activities. In addition, discussion of improving
pride in
the job, responsibility, and generally better quality
ed
discussion of the possibility of a Parks Foreman, designated Lead
Worker, or intermittent Lead Worker.
We determined that the intermittent Lead Worker would be the most
appropriate option at this time. A lead worker would be assigned
when the complexity of operations and number of employees would
require coordination of activities to insure efficiency and
thoroughness. The lead worker would be responsible to 'check out'
the job site at the end of the shift or project and to report any
additional needs in the area. The concept of 'intermittent'
assignments allows us the flexibility to assign those individuals
with unique qualifications to jobs requiring
kills. I
also insures that the asignment is rotated causing those
employees to consider the overall job. We would hope this
and
Clittleethings d timprooe pri s de in
nowork
rlook 4 observance of those
Staff developed a concept proposal and met with the employees and
their union representative on September filth. We discussed the
concept of an intermittent lead man and asked for their comments.
They raised a number of issues including how selection
wouldman, the
be
handled, the amount of differential pay for
the need for a job description, and why we feel it is necessary.
We explained our thoughts that the lead man would not "supervise"
employees, but merely coordquality, thoroughness, andactivities for hconsistency.
of
ensuring efficiency, quality,
Projects needing a lead man would be determined by the Public
Works Foreman, and assignments wuld be by him, based on needed
o
skills, experience and abilities. Types of projects which a lead
man might be assigned would einclude major work efforts
ing and involving
Q3
a number of employ etc.) where coordination
pathway construction, street patching,
of activities is necessary, or work locations where a number of
different activities are going on simultaneously and coordination
is necessary to 'stay out of each other's way' and to insure
everything gets done.
The employees indicated the desire that a list be maintained of
people eligible to be lead man, that no one be forced to accept
the lead man assignment, that there be input from them as to when
a lead man was needed, and that the differential pay be included
in contract negotiations. A few of our employees expressed an
opinion after the meeting that they felt there was not a need for
a lead man, that everyone should be striving for high quality
work at all times and should take responsibility for their work
and for working together.
If we decide it is appropriate to establish the Lead Man concept,
our current thoughts are that the differential pay would be
between $0.35 and $0.60 per hour; but this would be an item of
contract negotiation. we also feel that approximately 1,000 to
1,500 hours per year would be involved in this status. I would
propose an increase in the 1990 budget of $1,000 to cover this
classification.
Additional ideas include the use of inspection checklists for
parks maintenance, activity checklists, and one of the summer
parks temporaries being an older or more mature person to
supervise the other seasonal parks employees. This latter idea
�, would require greater pay to attract a qualified person.
r (E.oRANDUM
Memo To :Mayor and City Council Members
From :Ric Minetor, City Engineer/Directorof lic Works
Date :September 22, 1989 0
Subject :Bike Trail Request on old Highway 8
I have received Ramsey Conty's response to the request for a bike
lane or path along old Highway 8 (attached). The county is
indicating that the reconstruction of old Highway 8 is sceduled
for 1994 and that we are the responsible agency for initiating
construction of a bicycle facility.
I would recommend that we consider the construction of a bicycle
facility in conjunction with the reconstruction of Old Highway S.
Further, I recommend that the issue of continuation of this
proposed bicycle facility be considered at the same time. The
ending f t seem
appropriate, 1eand cthe econtinuation twould tbeRneeded oad H would o
from asafety
point of view.
Ramsey County Department
of Public Works,,
Kenneth E. Welt:in
® 350 St. Peter Street
Count E'w
a
Paul L. Klrkwold
Suite 270
Saint Paul. Minnesota 55102
�" y Dmim
and
(612) 2984127
RAMSEVCOUNTY
<' '
A,41101 Caenly Eni)` a
lf
September 8, 1989
T1 rf
\\fL G,CV• ..�•u
Mr. Don McNamara
5551 St. Stephen Street
Mounds view, Minnesota 55112
Dear Mr. McNamara:
t 14, 1989, regarding the
Thank you for your letter of Augus
construction
oofta bicycle
New ilane
er..or det schedwpborderltoeTrank Old
ath
Highway
Highway 10.
In response to your concern over the need for improvements to 8,
better accommodate bicycles aCapitallong 1improvements section fProgram old 9(CIP). l�rart
we have reviewed our 1989mai Cap' p ro ects
The Cip identifies which maintenance and ethree-yconstructear time frame
are scheduled to be implemented wi thin
this of Old
of the prog icategory of the CIP.
Highway 8 is listed in the non-programmedro rammed schedule,
As projects are completed �� enterthe thethree-year schedule based
non -programmed projects .•= priorities and
on their priority score. Based on existing
current funding levels, this section of Old Highway 8 could be
reconstructed in 1994.
Due to the fact that this
earseCtion Ramseyfcountyroadway
willcould
notbschedule any
reconstructed in four y
major improvements for this seccesumed ion of �hatHthewreconstructed
shoulder improvements. it is p
roadway would accommodate four lanes of Ramsey
county commensurate
the improved roadway to the south. Ramsey Y
the constructioncyof Mounds View at the time old Hihway 8 is
ofa bicycle lane or detached path if grequested
to do so by the
scheduled for reconstruction.
The City of Mounds View is the agency responsible for initiating
the construction of a bicycle facfor the ility along this section of Old
Highway 8. They are responsible
maintenance ooftthe fthe cost,
bicycle
toand in the case of the path,
facility.
_1z?J .
I hope I have adequately addressed
construction of a bicycle facility
the New Brighton/Mounds View Border
Please contact me at 298-4127'if I
to you.
Sincerely,
KennethEWelt zfn, P.E.
Director and County Engineer
TM
your concerns over tua
adjacent to old Highway 8 from
to Trunk Highway 10.
can be of further assistance
MEMO TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: CLERK-ADMINISTRATO
DATE: SEPTEMBER 22
1989
4
SUBJECT: CITY SURVEY
As you requested, I contacted Dr. William Morris of Decision
Resources, Ltd. regarding performing a full survey of the
City, such as was done in March of 1988 but with more effort
towards focusing on specific issues such as recycling/
organized collection and development of the Silver View Park
Master Plan.
As you may recall, the 1988 survey consisted of 117
questions with a total of 402 randomly selected residents
being surveyed by phone. The total cost of this survey was
$6,600. Dr. Morris has indicated that his current rates are
$5,500 for the first 60 questions with $75.00 for each
additional question thereafter. Dr. Morris also indicated
that at no additional cost his firm would perform a
comparative analysis between the 1988 survey and the one you
are currently considering to allow us to track community
demographics and attitudes.
Once you have decided the timeframe of this survey based
upon the 1990 budget process I would like to ask that you
provide me with some specific direction regarding the types
Of issues you would like to have surveyed and any specific
questions you might have asked. As was done for the 1988
survey, I will then ask Dr. Morris and members of city staff
to develop questions based upon the issues identified and
present to you a proposed survey for your review, comment
and editorialization.
I hope this information adequately responds to your initial
direction and begins to prepare you for the next City
survey.
DFP/MJS