Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packets - 1989/10/16CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW CITY COUNCIL OCTOBER 16, 1989 7:00 P.M. - SPECIAL MEETING - Consideration of Bids for Silver View Park Shelter Building Construction (Agenda Session to Follow Special Meeting) ----------------------------------------------------------- AGENDA SESSION 1. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding Fireworks for Festival In The Park/1990 Plans 2. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding Racing Pigeon Regulation 3. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding Request for Easement Agreement 4. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding Ice Rinks 5. Consideration of Request to Declare Surplus Equipment 6. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding Silver View Master Plan Schedule 7. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding Aquatics Coordinator Position 8. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding Development/ Final Stage Conditional Use Permit/Planned Unit Development for Mounds View Square (Hardees) 9. Consideration of Development Agreement #89-93 for Mounds View Square (Hardees), Planning Case 276-89 10. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding Address Change 11. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding Conditional Use Permit for Amoco (Car Wash), 2155 Program Avenue, Planning Case #241-88 12. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding Anoka County -Blaine Airport Capital Improvement Environ- mental Review Process I^"a. 13• Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding Recycling 14. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding Resolution No. 2549 Authorizing Budget Transfers for 1989 Salary Adjustments APPROVED PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA 2401 Hwy. 10, 1• Call to Order The Pledge of Allegiance was said. 2• Pledge of Allegiance MEMBERS meetin'zt�) Blanchard,bPaone,11WuorihandoMayorthe 3. Roll Call Hankner. Regular Meeting September 25, 1989 Mounds View City Hall Mounds View, MN 55112 The Mounds View City Mayor Hankner at 7:03 Council was called to order by PM on Monday, September 26, 1989 It was noted Councilmember Quick was attending another meeting and would be joining the Council meeting shortly. ALSO PR: City Attorney Berne Brager and City Planner Hren. y' Finance Director Motion/S: panne/Wuori to a 11, 1989 minutes as corrected. approve the September 4 ayes 0 nays There were no residents requests or comments from the floor. Mayor Hankner closed the regular meeting and opened the first public hearing at 7:06 PM. City Planner Hren explained the owner of Mid -American Auto, at 2975 Highway 10, has requested a waiver to the moratorium along Highway 10, as he would like to erect a free-standing sign and eliminate all other signage on the property. Due to the moratorium, he could technically only paint a sign on the building. The Planning Commission has reviewed the request and recommends denial, baseon the moratorium. Without IN the moratorium, the signd wou ments. ld meet all code require- 4. Approval of Minutes: September 21, 1989 Motion Carried 5. Residents Requests and Comments from the Floor 6. Public Hearing: Mid -American Auto Request for Waiver of HWY. 10 Corridc: Moratorium Requirements Mounds View City Council Regular Meetinq ---------- September 25, --- 989 -------------ageTwo Mayor Hankner ex ------------- some months explained the moratorium was put - in - for the Haigo while the Comp plan was being updatedCe - -- in Fthe Hi y 10 corridor. It is due to be completed The ebraary, and will be followed by public hearings. is in effect until April., 1990. Kevin Mullins, owner of Mid -American Auto, stated he had not realized until recently that he needed e sent a hardship. He stated he needs to be competitive with the etheresses to Pre - Park has seven autondeale in the area, and SprIn on their dealers with free-standingi Lake his businesoperty, and his lack of si na signs He added there is an existing scement ng foundation base the sign would be erected on, and electrical servi had ce is already in place, and he has a sign designed that would be in conformance with all City requirements, and he presented a sketch of what the sign would look like, as well as photos of Signs at dealerships in Spring Lake Park. Councilmember Quick joined the meeting at 7:11 pM, Mayor Hankner closed the public hearing and reopened the regular meeting at 7:14 PM. Mayor Hankner closed the second the regular meeting and opened public hearing 7• at 7:14 PM. Public Hea; Ms. Hren explained Super America, who has recently Purchased all 7-11 Request for wetland Altera- stores in Minnesota, has a wetlands alteration y tion Permit by Silver Lake Road, as Permit for the store at the Super Super America, store sits in the wetland buffer zone. The mansard cdonge the 7295 Silver Lake Road at this time, andewouldto additionalnwand later, to include landscaping, ork lot repair of the parking and other minor repairs. They are approval requesting of all changes at this time, to avoid having me to come back as they are ready to Planning Commission has each item. The reviewed the request and The wouldmnotsbapelival property is zoned B-1, and 9 for B-3 zoning. gas pumps, which require Jesse Varnes, 7350 Silver Lake Road, is concerned stated he would like to see the place fixed up but he that they may pump gas later. Mayor Hankner explained they do not have room on their Property for gas pumps, nor is the zoning appropriate. A request for the installation of gas pumps there was denied in the past. Ms. Hren reviewed the requirements for gas pumps. She also noted they would have one year to complete the work from the time the permit is issued. ,. Mounds View City Council Regular Meeting Mayor Hankner closed the public hearing and reopened the regular meeting at 7:18 PM. Motion/Second: Wuori/Quick to approve the consent agenda, as amended, and waive the reading of the resolutions. 5 ayes 0 nays Dr. George Realmuto, of the University of Minnesota School of Medicine, Department of Child and Adole- scent Psychiatry, distributed a synopsis of the study he hopes to publish on the role of City government in psychological relief services, related to the Williams Pipeline disaster. Dr. Realmuto made a slide presentation and reviewed the analysis of City governments role in a disaster of this type, as well as the findings of the door to door survey that was done after the disaster. The Council thanked Dr. Realmuto for his time and making the presentation. Mayor Hankner closed the regular meeting and opened the third public hearing at 8:02 PM. Mod Feders, of Buetow and Associates, architects for the library, presented a scale model of the pro- posed library, and he reviewed the site plan and proposed parking, landscaping, building construction and layout. Grace Berry, no address given, asked if any of the library property is optional for sale for something else. Mr. Feders responded it belongs to the County and is planned for the future expansion of the library. Carol Zolinski, of Groveland Avenue, extended her thanks to everyone whohas worked so hard to get the library in Mounds View. County Commissioner Duane McCarty reviewed the history of getting the library in Mounds View. Mayor Hankner closed the public hearing and reopened the regular meeting at 8:17 PM. September 25, 1989 Page Three 8. Approval of Consent Agenda Motion Cacried 9. Presentation of Williams Pipeline Disaster Study 10. Public Hearing: Ramsey County Library Conditional Use Permit for Branch Library Mounds View City Council Regular Meeting ------------------------ September 25, 1989 Page Four Ron Langness, of Springsted Financial Advisors, report- 11. Presentatio!, ed bids had been opened earlier in the day for the of Bids for Mounds View Business Park tax increment bond sale, and Mounds View they are very pleased with the results. Interest Business Park rates are close to projections, with five bids re- Tax Increment ceived, and interest at 9.21%. Bond Sale Attorney Karney reported he had received the documen- tation and reviewed it. Notion/Second: Quick/Blanchard to approve Resolution No. 2540, authorizing and awarding the sale of, and providing the forms, terms, covenants and directions for $1,490,000 taxable general obligation tax incre- ment bonds, Series 1989C, to First Bank National Association, and pledging for the security thereof tax increment from Tax Increment Financing District No. 1, and waive the reading. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion/Second: Paone/Wuori to approve Resolution No. 2541, authorizing the sale of, and providing the forms, terms, covenants and directions for $930,000 general obligation tax increment bonds, Series 1989B, to Norwest Investment Services, and pledging for the security thereof tax increment from Tax Increment Financing District No. 1, and waive the reading. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion/Second: Paone/Hankner to approve Resolu- tionT No. 2535, approving a conditional use permit and development site plans for the Ramsey County library located at 2575 Mounds view Drive, Planning Case No. 277-89, and waive the reading. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion/Second: Quick/Wuori to approve Resolution No. 2538, approving a wetland alteration permit for Super America to perform work in a wetland buffer area at 7295 Silver Lake Road, Planning Case No. 279-89, and waive the reading. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried E Motion Carried 12. Consideration of Resolution No. 2535 Motion Carried 13. Consideration of Resolution No. 2538 Motion Carried Mounds View City Council Regular Meeting C" Motion/Second: Quick/Wuori to approve Resolution No. 2536, approving the requested modification to the moratorium district to allow the addition of a free- standing sign at Mid -American Auto located at 2975 Highway 10, to include that it has been deter - minded the applicant has demonstrated a hardship, it does not affect the general health, safety and welfare of the residents of the City, the approval of this does not affect the integrity of the ordinance, and it is consistent with the intent of the ordinance, and waive the reading. 4 ayes 1 nay Councilmember Blanchard voted against the motion. There was considerable discussion before the vote was taken. Councilmember Paone expressed concern that with this exception, others along the Highway 10 corridor might also ask to make changes. Councilmember Blanchard stated she agreed with Councilmember Peone's comments and added there is a (- moratorium in place, and once one exception is approved, it will be very difficult to control. She added this weakens the moratorium and ordinance. Councilmember Quick pointed out the intent was that property could not be improved, and he considers this type of request as not falling into that category. He also pointed out if this is denied, they might lose the opportunity for any improvement to that property. Councilmember Wuori stated in working on the Comp Plan, they worked with the land usage, and did not touch signage. She stated she does not feel this interfers with the moratorium. Ms. Bran reviewed the conditions under which a modification to the moratorium could be granted. Mr. Mullins explained he bought the business in 1987, and he reviewed the changes he has made since then. He is trying to make improvements to the outside now, and is requesting the sign approval. He explained he has used the temporary sign permit, which is allowed for three 21 day periods per year, and signage at the / roadside does enhance and improve his business, and they have a noticeable increase in sales when the small boulevard sign is in use. September 25, 1989 Page Five 14. Consideration of Resolution No. 2536, Mid -American Auto Motion Carried September 251 1989 Mounds View City Council Page Six Regular Meeting ----------------'------ --------- __ Mayor Hankner stated she did not feel this affects the integrity of the ordinance. Attorney Kerney recommended the resolution rrflect have been met. that the requirements of the ordinance Motio_ n_/Second: Quick/Hankner to table this item. 15. 2nd Reading and Adoption of Ordinance 5 ayes 0 nays No. 470 Motion Carried Hren explained the address change is required as 16. 1st Reading of Ordinance Ms. the house being built is now facing Arden Avenue, No. 477 rather than Spring Lake Road. Motion/Second: Paone/Blanchard to have the first the municipal Teading of ordinance No. 477 ending by 9 code of Mounds View Numbers", and waive the reading. "House and Building Motion Carried 5 ayes 0 nays 0 proposed Ordinance No. 474. 17. 2nd Reading and Adoption Ms. Hren reviewed of Ordinance Motion/Second: Quick/Wuori to have the second 474, amending No. 474 readin adoption of Ordinance No. municipal code en- Chapter 42 of the Mounds View "Subdivision Regulations", and waive the titled reading. Councilmember Quick - aye Councilmember Blanchard - aye Councilmember Paone - aye Councilmember Wuori - aye Motion Carried Mayor Hankner - aye Director Brager explained proposed Ordi- 18. 1st Reading of Ordinance Finance nance No. 476 concerns license fees for non-intoxi- into conformance No. 476 cating liquor, and brings the Code with State law. Motion/Second: Quick/Hankner to have the irst 476, amending the fmunici- readordinance No. in Mounds View by amending Chapter 101, pal code of "Non -Intoxicating Liquor' is Motion Carried 5 ayes 0 nays Mounds View City Council September 25, 1989 Regular Meeting Page Seven Mr. Brager read Ordinance No. 476. Mr. Brager reviewed proposed Ordinance No. 475. 19. 1st Reading of Ordinance Motion/Second: Paone/Wuori to approve the first No. 475 reading of Ordinance No. 475, amending the code of Mounds View by amending Chapter 100 entitled "Intoxicating Liquor", and waive the reading. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Paul Mielke, 5176 Brighton Lane, asked if this would 20. Consideration apply only to students under age 18, or to all of Resolution students regardless of age. No. 2537 Mayor Hankner replied it needs clarification. Motion/Second: Blanchard/Paone to table this item. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Alice Frits, 8072 Long Lake Road,stated with the 21. Consideration C' new library, bike safety and training will be even of Staff Memo more important. Regarding Bike Safety Programs Mr. Brager reported that Staff recommends the City, in Spring of in conjunction with the school system, offer a 1990 bicycle safety training class at the City's two elementary schools. Councilmember Blanchard asked that people realize bike riders are not just children, and adults ride them and need to be aware of the rules also. Notion/Second: Paone/Wuori to direct Staff to begin putting together a bicycle training program with the elementary schools in the area, as a joint effort with the Police and Park and Rec Departments, and further investigate adult safety. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Debbie Jones, no address given, stated she had parti- cipated in bicycle rodeos in other communities and found them to be very helpful. Police Chief Ramacher explained the City cannot a begin requiring licensing of bikes on a citywide `- level, that it can only be required on a State level. Park and Rec Director Saarion reviewed the programs that have been offered in the past. Mounds View City Council September 25, 1989 Regular Meeting Page Eight - Mr. Mielke stated he felt it was important to get bike riders on the right side of the road, as well as to wear helmets and signal turns. Mrs. Frits stated she would still like to see a program that incorporates the laws of the road, as they need to develop good habits in children now. as they are the drivers of the future. Ms. Saarion reviewed the three bids that were re- 22. Consideration ceived for the Silver View Park water and sewer of Staff Memo services. Regarding Award for Motion/Second: wuori/Hankner to award the contract Silver View to Volk Sewer and Water for the installation of a 6" Park Water and ductile watermain and 4" sewer service at Silver Sewer Service View Park, in the amount of $24,680.00. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Ms. Saarion explained a fire hydrant is not included in this bid,but it could be added now or later. Mr. Brager reported the pay request by Lametti & 23. Consideratiq9 Sons has been reviewed by the City Engineer, who of Staff MOO recommends payment. Regarding Pay Request by Motion/Second: Blanchard/Quick to approve the par- Lametti & Sons teal 'payment ayment request of Lametti & Sons for the public improvement portion of the Sysco development, in the amount of $68,986.24, to be charged to account #480-4121-705. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Mr. Brager reviewed the status of delinquent 24. Consideration utility bills and requested that a public hearing of Staff Memo be set to consider certifying them to Ramsey Regarding County for collection with next years property tax Delinquent levy. Utility Bills Motion/Second: Paone/Blanchard to set a public hearing for 7:10 PM on October 23, 1989 to con- sider certifying delinquent utility accounts. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried 0 Mounds View City Council September 25, 1989 Regular Meeting Page Nine ------------------------------------------------------------------- ^ Ms. Hren updated the Council on the status of the 25. Consideration Taco Bell restaurant. The building is complete and of Staff Memo the necessary approvals have been received. Regarding Taco Bell Certificate Motion/Second: Wuori/Quick to approve the issuance of Occupancy of a— cert ticate of occupancy for Taco Bell, 2219 Highway 10. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Attorney Kerney reviewed the history of the business 25. Report of condominium arrangement between Taco Bell and Kentucky Attorney Fried Chicken, which are owned by the same parent company. He stated he has not seen the final agreement yet and understands it has not been signed yet but is in the works. He explained Kentucky Fried Chicken is requesting additional time to get the agreement worked out, but they would like to begin construction now and are requesting a building permit. Mr. Karney advised the Council could approve issuing the building permit, contingent upon them holding the City harmless if they begin construction and then the City finds the condominium agreement is not acceptable. motion/Second: Paone/Hankner that the building permit for Kentucky Fried Chicken can be issued, contingent upon approval of the condominium agreement, and enter- ing into a hold harmless agreement, and the certificate of occupancy and restaurant license can be held until the agreement has been entered into. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Mr. Ramacher asked Council approval of the purchase 27. Report of of a 1989 Blazer, to replace the 1982 unmarked squad Staff car. The 182 will be traded in and be considered Members the down payment, with full payment then due on or about January 2, 1990. He explained this is a budgeted item for 1990. Motion/Second: Quick/Paone to approve the purchase of the 1989 Blazer, from Polar Chevrolet, in the amount of $14,490, with $4,490 to be transferred from the Police budget to the equipment fund. 5 ayes 0 nays Ms. Saarion reported the Silver View shelter committee met earlier in the approved the specs for the shelter. send them out on September 29, with opened October 13. Park picnic evening and They hope to bids to be Motion Carried Mounds View City Council September 25, 1989 Regular Meeting Page Ten Councilmember Paone left the meeting at 9:28 PM. • Mayor Hankner suggested the Council could call to order if necessary at the October 16 agenda session, to take action on the bids received. Motion/Second: Hankner/quick to set the October 16 agenda session as a regular meeting for the purpose of taking action on bids fcr the Silver View Park picnic shelter. 4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Councilmember Quick requested Staff provide infor- 28. Report of nation on possible sites and costs for a fire Councilmembers: hydrant and drinking fountains for Silver View Councilmember Park, at the next agenda session. Quick Councilmember Paone rejoined the meeting at 9:32 PM. Councilmember Quick asked that the sign ordinance be placed on the agenda for review at the next agenda session. Councilmember Blanchard reported she had represen- Councilmembee ted the City at the dedication of the newly Blanchard remodeled Fire Station No. 3 in Blaine on September 24, and it is very nice. Councilmember Paone had no report. Councilmember Paone Councilmember Wuori reported she had helped at the Councilmember household hazardous waste collection day in New Wuori Brighton on September 23, and it was very successful. Mayor Hankner suggested the Council set a time to Mayor Hankner discuss the budget, as the Legislature is most likely going to call to order this Wednesday. The public hearing is scheduled for October 9, and the law requires the budget be adopted at the same time. It was agreed to meet on October 2, at 7:30 PM, prior to the start of the regular agenda session. Mayor Hankner reported she had received a phone call concerning the safety of the decks at Landmark Estates. Attorney Karney reviewed the history of the problem with the decks and pending litigation the City is involved in now. September 25, 1989 Mounds View City Council Page Eleven Regular Meeting --_- --- Mayor Hankner alerted the Council that she had re- ceived a call concerning access to the Knollwood extension, and a petition may be coming in to the City. Mayor Hankner asked that the utility rate study letter received from Kraus Anderson be directed to Ric Minetor, if it hadn't already. Mr. Brager had no report. 29. Report of Clerk/ Administrator There being no further business before the Council, 30. Adjournment the meeting was adjourned by Mayor Hankner at 9:44 PM. MEMO TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL FROM: MARY SAARION, DIRECTOR PARKS, RECREATION AND FORESTRY DATE: OC 0BER 3, 1989 SUBJECT: FIREWORKS FOR FESTIVAL IN THE PARK At the agenda session on Monday, October 16, representatives from Northern Lighter Pyrotechnics will be present to discuss with the Council their concerns regarding the current location of the Festival fireworks display. They wish to discuss possible options and alternatives for future fireworks displays. Please see their letter attached. MS/SL Attachment 4 NORTHERN LIGHTER PYROTECHNICS Mi Creative Fireworks Dapla a *Designers © Shooters. P.O. Box 19763 ± St. Paul, Mn. 55119 `,+.'•'w ?I `. AW- MOUNDS VIEW CITY COUNCIL, AS ALWAYS, THE NORTHERN LIGHTERS VERY MUCH ENJOYED PROVIDING AND DISPLAYING THE FIREWORKS FOR YOUR CELEBRATION IN THE PARK. I HOPE THE NEW SEPTEMBER DATING WORKED OUT WELL WITH BOTH YOURSELVES AND THE AUDIENCE. THIS YEAR WE SHOT THE ENTIRE SHOW ELECTRICALLY. BECAUSE WE DID THIS THE TIMING WAS VERY GOOD ALONG WITH THE CONTENT. AS IN THE PAST WE WERE LIMITED IN THE SIZE OF SHELLS WE COULD USE BECAUSE OF THE SITE AND ITS TIGHT QUARTERS. WE WOULD LIKE TO BE ABLE TO INCLUDE MANY TYPES OF NEW ITEMS THAT HAVE BECOME AVAILABLE OVER THE YEARS. BUT THE SITE JUST IS NOT APPROPRIATE. A NUMBER OF OUR MEMBERS ARE LICENSED SHELL MANUFACTURERS AND THEY HAVE THE ABILITY TO BUILD VERY HIGH QUALITY AERIAL SHELLS. ALTHOUGH WE ARE ABLE TO INSERT A FEW OF THESE SHELLS IN YOUR SHOW WE WOULD LIKE TO INCLUDE MANY MORE, BUT AGAIN, THE SITE IS JUST NOT ADEQUATE. UPPERMOST ON EVERYONE'S MINDS IS SAFETY, AND EVEN WITH THE RESTRICTIONS WE PLACE ON SHELL SIZE WE FEEL THE PRESENT Sits JUST IS NOT AS SAFE AS IT SHOULD BE. IF WE COULD GUARAN'iat THAT EVERY ITEM WOULD PERFORM EXACTLY AS WE HOPE AND EXPECT AND IF THERE WOULD BE A PROBLEM, THAT THE DISTANCE BETWEEN EFFECT AND PEOPLE WOULD BE ADEQUATE WE WOULD HAVE THE BEST OF WORLDS. BUT UNFORTUNATELY THAT IS NOT THE CASE. WHAT WE ARE LOOKING FOR IS BETTER COMFORT FACTOR. WITH THAT I AM ASKING THAT YOU SERIOUSLY LOOK INTO ANOTHER SITE THAT MIGHT BE AVAILABLE FOR THE FIREWORKS. I. MYSELF. OR ANOTHER OF OUR MEMBERS WOULD BE MORE THAN WILLING TO ASSIST YOU IN DETERMINING THE ADEQUACY OF ANY POTENTIAL SITE. I SINCERELY HOPE YOU WILL GIVE. THIS REQUEST VERY HIGH PRIORITY. WE LOCI: FORWARD TO SERVING YOUR NEEDS NEXT YEAR WITH A FIREWORKS SHOW THAT HAS FEW IF ANY CONSTRAINTS ON THE TYPES OF EFFECTS WE CAN DISPLAY. IF YOU NEED MORE INPUT FROM OUR ORGANIZATION AND WOULD Lii:: • TO DISCUSS THIS MATTER FURTHER. PLEASE FEEL FREE TO COI'iTACT PIE EITHER AT WORK 448-85.13 OR AT HOME•!?2-20G1. Sit/CEREL YOURS. Ej MEMO TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL ' FROM: MARY SAARION, DIRECTOR PARKS, RECREATION AND FORESTRY DATE: OCTOBER 11, 1989 SUBJECT: "FESTIVAL IN THE PARK' As you all know, "Festival in the Park" was held in September rather than July. During the September Parks and Recreation Commission meeting, Commissioners reviewed Joanne Valley's letter regarding the Festival. FEEDRACK Commissioner's Long and Silvis participated as volunteer workers at the Festival. They expressed their pleasure regarding the number of community organizations participating in the events. One of the reasons for changing the date to September was to encourage participation by school groups, church groups and organizations. Commissioners reported that they had good feedback regarding the Festival. DATE The Festival date is determined by the availability of the showmobile. Although the preferred date was September 10, the alternate date of September 17 was approved because of the availability of the showmobile. In retrospect, the September 17 date was probably more advantageous than September 10 because it gave school groups more time to organize considering that the fast day of school was September 5. COMMUNITY GROUP PARTICIPATION Fifteen (15) community groups participated in the 1989 Festival. They included: Sunnyside PTA Pinewood PTA IHS Cheerleaders Cross of Glory Church Mounds View Lioness Club New Brighton Firstar Bank of Mounds View Fire Department Robot Display Early Childhood Family Education Mounds View Uon's Club IHS Girls Volleyball Booster Club IHS Hockey Moths Lindy's Gymnastics Club MV Community Theater Explorer Post Volunteers Boy Scout Troop 400 -2- PUBL[CCPY A standard publicity program is implemented for "Festival in the Park". A list of marketing procedures is as follows: Flyers to schools (1,500) Public Service Announcements to radio and newspapers (25) - Flyers to ball teams (60) Flyers to volleyball teams (30) Letters to food concessionaires (15) Letters to crafters (150) Letters to merchants with posters (160) Posts in local community facilities; i.e. Edgewood Community Center, Bel Rae, church, schools Articles to local newspapers: Focus and Bulletin Publicize in two City Newsletters reaching every residence in Mounds View Post on City sign Listing on Channel 16 cable TV Interview opportunities: KANO Radio Years ago, the Festival Commission made a practice of nailing up posters on telephone poles. This practice was discontinued in an effort to discourage the unsightliness of telephone poles littered with signs throughout the City. Also, the telephone companies do not encourage such practices. l-J fe -3- CONFLICTS The July Festival date always seemed to conflict with the Aquatennial and other City festivals, and family vacations. The September Festival conflicted with church carnivals and the Vikings football game. This metropolitan area is besieged by various festivals, events, bazaars, parades, etc. held on various weekends and special dates. Conflicts will arise on any given date. RECOMMENDATION FOR 1990 If Council agrees that the "Festival in the Park." should continue to be held in September, staff recommends that the chosen date be a Saturday rather than a Sunday for three reasons: 1. The "Festival" would not be competing with a televised Viking game. 2. The "Festival" would not interfere with church or Sunday School services. 3. Fireworks would be held on a non -school night, allowing children to stay up longer for the fireworks display. Staff wishes to discuss this recommendation at the October 16 agenda session to get a feel for Councirs desires for the 1990 "Festival in the Park". MS/SL r A � TO: MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL FROM: CLERK -ADMINISTRATOR PAUL Y DATE: SEPTEMBER 26, 1989 SUBJECT: RACING PIGEON REGULATION Pursuant to your direction, I have researched the issue of regulating racing/carrier pigeons. The amount of information that is available without conaucting a national search is extremely limited. Apparently the issue of regulating racing/carrier pigeons by local governments was first addressed during the urbanization of metro area beginning with the center cities in the 50s and the suburbs in the 70s and 80s. There are no State laws regarding racing or carrier pigeons except to include them in the class of unprotected animals in the State thus subject to being hunted during a specified season. With the assistance of the league of Minnesota Cities. I have obtained a sampling of ordinances from various cities regulating racing/carrier pigeons. The methods of regulation include the following, 1. Complete prohibition. This would appear to be true for the majority of the cities in the metro area. 2. Prohibition within urbanized parts of a community. Some suburbs on the fringe of the metro area, e.g. Savage, Prior Lake and Lino Lakes, have established Urban and Rural Service Areas within their communities. The definition of rural and urban might be different, but the regulation is similar in that pigeons are allowed in rural areas only. 3. Allowed with permit. The cities of St. Paul, Coon Rapids, West St. Paul, Richfield and Robbinsdale allow the keeping of pigeons within their communities when a permit has been issued, but that is where the similarity ends. Each of these communites has different provisions regarding the number of pigeons that may be kept, consent by adjacent property owners and the distance involved, location and construction of the loft, sanitary conditions, and level of confinement of birds to the loft. Before proceeding any further in the process of developing a draft ordinance which would allow racing/carrier pigeons in the City, I would like to solicit your direction on some of the issues that have come out in my research. I woula like to place before you several questions and ask for your consensus response to each. After receiving your response I will be able to draft an ordinance which will be reflective of your .ires in this matter. the questions are as follows, 1. Do you wish to regulate the presence of rar.ina/carrier pigeons in the City by issuing permits, _. Should the permits be issued by the City Council or admini•;tratively' 3. If the permits are to be issued by the Council, should a public hearing be required? 4. Should written consent be required from adjacent property owners. If so, what distance? Immediately adaacent, 250 feet, 350 feet, 500 feet? 5. Should there be a limit on the number of birds? If so, what would be the maximum number of permitted birds? b. Should Iinits be placed on the location and size of the loft? If so, does the Council wish to define a loft as an accessory building subject to the provisions of the Zoning and Building Codes? 7. Do you wish to require that the loft be kept in a sanitary state by requiring that it be cleaned on a regular, weekly or daily, basis? B. Do you wish to require that all feed be kept in rodent free containers? 9. Do you wish to require that the pigeons be confined to the loft except for short periods of exercise? 10. Are there any other requirements you wish to add? Thank you for your direciton. V • to E MEMO TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL y/,/-. ;': , ,z FROM: MARY SAARION, DIRECTOR PARKS, RECREATION AND FORESTRY DATE: OCrOBER 3, 1989 SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR EASEMENT AGREEMENT At the September 28, 1989 Parks and Recreation Commission meeting, the Parks and Recreation Commission directed staff to request that Council consider beginning the process for the development of an easement agreement with Gaughan Companies regarding a pathway continuation on their land abutting Silver View Park pond. The Commission expressed a concern for urgency since Gaughan Companies have expressed a receptiveness to an easement agreement. The Commission felt that even with an agreement, action could be delayed or postponed. It was the Commission's thought that it would be to the City's benefit to be prepared for future action. Staff wishes to discuss this request with the Council regarding the easement agreement. MS/SL P] 0 MEMO TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL FROM: MARY SAARION, DIRECTOR PARKS, RECREATION AND FORESTRY DATE: OCfOBER 4, 1989 SUBJECT: WINTER ICE RINKS Councilmember Quick reminded me that as a result of Mr. LaHoud's letter, council agreed to set a policy on the size and dimensions of park ice skating rinks. Since the winter season is quickly approaching, staff requests that this issue be discussed at the October 16 agenda session, so that rink grading and flooding can be implemented in a timely fashion. MS/SL Enclosure (Mr. LaHoud's letter) WINTER SKATING PROGRAM The winter skating season is usually schedule to begin on the third weekend in December, weather permitting. In 1987, the rinks were not able to open until December 28 because of unusually warm weather. Ice sheets were impossible to establish because of the warmth. Last year, the rinks opened on December 23 also due to the warn weather. The weather is a decisive factor in the establishment of rink ice. Unfortunately, a es)ty has no control over the weather. (See last year's memo regarding opening What is an adequate size for pleasure skating ninks? Here is staffs opinion regarding each site: LAMBERT Lambert, pleasure skating rink is a round shape, the size of the infield. It is adequate to handle the numbers of skaters at that rink. Staff has observed the rink when Pinewood School has used it for a skating outing. It adequately serves the 60 - 100 skaters during these days. In staffs opinion, the rink is a sufficient size. WOODCREST Woodcrest pleasure skating rink is a rectangular shape that more than adequately serves the pleasure skaters of this area. HILLVIEW This rink at one time was the largest pleasure skating rink in the City. However, it often times was empty except for occasionally 1 - 6 skaters. With the Hillview Park improvements, the pleasure skating rink was reduced in size. Staff believes that it sufficiently handles the number of skaters that currently use the facility. If exp is desired, the rink could increase to the north approximately 20 - 30 feet. However, a light pole would sit in the middle of the rink. GROVELAND This pleasure skating rink has been various sizes over the years. One year, the neighborhood residents performed the flooding duties and made a large pleasure skating rink. One year two small rinks were established, one to be used for pleasure skating and one to be used for boot hockey and stick hockey. Since that time, the tennis court/hard surface play area has been developed limiting the area to the west. One problem at Groveland is that a swale exists towards the midpoint of the park field. It is a difficult place to flood. If flooding is to be expanded at Groveland, additional fill and grading must be performed. Staff proposes that this rink be expandedslightly ol hfill,to the becau becauserth to he fillai dimension extremelyemely difficult 76 ft. x 100 h. requiring only grading to establish ice upon due to its warmth and heat absorption. NEIGHBORHOOD SKATING RINKS Winter ice rinks serve a purpose similar to a drop -in center. Ice rinks are skating ok facilities open to the general public for no fee during a set schedule of open hours. City skating facilities offer a warming shelter, facility supervisor, and established sheets of ice for skaters' enjoyment. Every city differs a little in the operation of ice rinks. For instance, the City of Minneapolis employs one maintenance man per park whose job is to sweep and flood the rink daily. The pleasure rinks in Minneapolis are huge, coveting complete athletic fields. Needless to say, to maintain and facilitate such huge rinks is beyond present capabilities for the City of Mounds View. Residents of the City of Mounds view live near t'fuee indoor skatitrg foci ties. These three indoor rinks are located in Blaine, Fridley and Shoreview. Indoor rinks have the advantage of offering excellent ice conditions due to constant and controlled ice and the benefit of indoor temperatures versus possible outdoor inclement weather conditions. Indoor open skating arenas handle 100 - 130 skaters paying $1.00 - $2.00 per 1.5 - 2 hour open skating session. Ice hockey teams often rent ice time for practices and games. Skating instruction classes fill to capacity. Ice time is always in demand by hockey leagues, broomball leagues and skating schools. Many skaters have experienced the benefits indoor ice. Unfortunately, outdoor ice cannot compare, nor can outdoor ice be established to match indoor ice due to weather, ground variables, and time limitations. Indoor ice provides excellent conditions. If skaters desire excellent conditions, indoor facilities are available. Outdoor skating offers benefits too. City rinks offer outdoor settings and most skaters are within walking distance from their homes. Outdoor rinks charge no fee. They serve as youth drop -in centers for pick-up games. The old fashioned neighborhood rink is still popular as indicated by the statistics. 0 1901111MIA... Current Facility: 1/2 size hockey rink - well lit Pleasure skating rink - well lit Activities: Skating lessons: 35 participants Boot hockey: 22 participants 1987-88 statistics 1,873 skaters 1988-89 statistics 1,472 skaters* *The decrease shown is due to the fact that Lake Region Hockey shifted their games and practices to Lambert and Woodcrest rinks. L 0 n 9 L a k e R 0 a d Hillview Road Tot Lot r—i III Bldg = x x x D r 1'2 Pleasure is FHockey Rink �. Rink i i n .a x x x g Possible e 0 Expansion �. VB Sc, Court 0 Picnic Area L L GROVELAND PARK L,1 Current Facility: Lighted pleasure skating rink. Activities Skating lessons: 46 participants 1987-88 Statistics 1,427 skaters 1988-89 Statistics 1.886 skaters 0 Arden Rue. V4 — O \ IV Pla Egwpn�nt 0 00 0 K1611-011t .. . _Currently Facility: Full-size, lighted hockey rink with hockey goals and broomball goals. Pleasure skating rink, dimly lit. Activities: Irondale High School Sno Daze Broomball Tournament Men's Broomball Tournament Lake Region Hockey 1987-88 Statistics 1,556 skaters 1988-89 Statistics 2,032 skaters Tot Lot Hockey ' Rink / Bldy 1 Pleasure Rink I -.. E Lambert Avenue 40 0 11 WOODCREST PARK Current Facility Full-sized, lighted hockey rink with hockey goals and broomball goals. Pleasure skating rink, dimly lit. Activities: Irondale High School Sno Daze Broomball Tournament Men's Broomball League 4-Man Hockey League Lake Region Hockey 1987-88 Statistics: 1988-89 Statistics: Incomplete statistics 2,200 skaters Woodcrest Drive O i VB Parking 1 Lot v e lr5 Court Hockey Rink Pleasure Bldg I kating Rink Tot Lot L a k e R 0 a d December 29, 1908 Mary Sarion Parks and Recreation Director 2401 Highway 10 Mounds View, MN 55112 Dear Ms Sarion, thern The ice skating season is plannedkfor size ofetherpleasureurinksiew at residents with the and pa p toltakewaadriveotoltheseaparks andrks. I ntake ahgoodvlookeatothehtwolan notdsensedthe thatnproblemsproduced will existresident overcrowdedskaters. rinksfit and is inadequate skating area, then obviously the developer has not laced up a pair of skates and participated in the activity. It totally baffles me that the city would allocate funds for new lighting and improved warming houses and in turn offer skating rinks that are grossly undersized. Mounds View rinks in their present form will create dangerous skating conditions due tomentkof of theaactivot�aneTherin situaoionill cansbeecomrelpareditosplayingkaters eracketball in a closet. of was My initial inquiry to your department regarding siz waseexamined swhen answered with the response that p attendance rt y d this year. It was also stated that the P.W. the rinks were grade E' inks based on available maintenance dept. determines the size of r and previous year sizes. I had a conversation with rink area and he advised that the urecreatiothispyearst. lsize of all rinks. What and that he seriously q arks pleasure rinks are half is different in 1988 that the subject p the size of previous years? If past attendance is the criteria for determining rink area, then I would expect that next year the city will throw out a few ice cubes at Hillview and Graveland, because this season will certainly curtail attendance based on available rinfamirea do not know ty skates regularlywatrHillvieWance statistics are derived from. MY poorly park and there are surfaces s a anddlacknumber of citykorers,ganizedpactiities at maintained skating the local rinks in Past years. Resident skaters respond to skating conditions, activitiesens arinksble and reasonable ice lfcities,tneglectsuweekend, holiday and two weeks after tsneighboring routine ice maintenanskatersdwillipursuereduces activityavailable elsewherekorinot area, then obviously engage in the sport at all. If you have determined a decline in pais rt c- irect pasttefforthandiplanningktoit is a provideddecentrfacilitiesction oandaprograms at 60 the rinks. Ifresennter tneeds substantial portionmofeour yearly is such hpark at iactivity- activities rep provides easy access Ice skating is one of the few winter sports tnat for residents and can offer inexpensive and rewarding activity, especiall for cabin fevered children. -z- The expanded winter activities in the recreation brochure are a welcomed sight for January and February, 1989. But do you honestly believe that the community skating party and weekly family skating parties have any chance for success with the tiny rink at Groveland7 Even after the P.W. dept. poor attempt to expand this rink, residents will encounter inadequate skating area. The childrens skating races that I had hoped would be added will face similar problems. It is time that this city recognizes tht recreation needs of its residents and supports such with competent planning and reasonable maintenance. There is no compromise for decent skating surfaces, especially on weekends and extended holidays, when residents use the facilities the most. It appears that we are not progressing with park facilities, but rather moving backwards as displayed by this years ice rinks, If lack of funds is reason for deteriation of the skating rinks, I would suggest the city realign its priorities. I do not think that adding expensive new park signs should be a primary goal o if important activities need more attention. f your planning, Sincerely Yours, Thomas Layoud cc City Administrator City Council 0 r MEMO TO: MAYOR AND COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: MARY SAARION, DIRECTOR PARKS, RECREATION AND FORESTRY DATE: JANUARY 3, 1989 SUBJECT: SKATING RINKS This is a list of opening dates for neighboring cities skating rinks: December 16 Anoka December 17 New Brighton December 17 Shoreview (had to close 3 days that week due to 4U degree weather) December 16 6 20 Spring Lake Park (opened one rink early, the others later) December 20 Fridley December 21 Arden Hills December 23 Mounds View December 23 Blaine December 23 Columbia Heights The City of Mounds View advertised the opening of neighborhood skating rinks on Saturday, December 17, weather permitting. Unfortunately, skating rinks were not established before December 23 due to warm weather in early December and 40 degree above weather the week of December 19. Some cities chose to flood rinks on double shifts, during the night and morning, to establish early ice. The City of Mounds View does do this on occasion when the weather is favorable. This is very costly because of overtime wages and also depletes the crew for daytime duties. For this reason, Rick Minetor, Mike Ulrich and 1 agreed that to spend an exhorbitant amount of time for ice establishment when the weather was unfavorable was a waste of time and money. As you know, most of the listed cities, have a separate park crew designated only for parks work. The City of Mounds View parks crew also functions in the public works pool and spends time on snow plowing, vehicle maintenance, and water main breaks; all of which 00 took place during the December 17 - December 31 timespan. MS/SL Attachment SKATING RINK STATISTICS TOTAL NUMBER DATE RINK HOURS OPEN OF SKATERS AVERAGE 12/23 Groveland 6 (4 - 10 pm) 36 6/hour 12/24 Groveland 7 (9 am - 4 pm) 40 5.7/hour 12/25 Groveland CLOSED 12/26 Groveland 9 (1 - 10 pm) 29 3.2/hour 12/27 Groveland 9 (1 - 10 pm) 31 3.4/hour 12/28 Groveland 9 (1 - 10 pm) 42 4.6/hour 12/29 Groveland 5 (1 - 10 pm) 31 3.3/hour 12/23 Lambert 6 (4 - 10 pm) 32 5.3/hour 12/24 Lambert 7 (9 am - 4 pm) 11 1.5/hour 12/25 Lambert CLOSED 12/26 Lambert 8 (1 - 9 pm) 25 3.1/hour 12/27 Lambert 9 (1 - 10 pm) 57 6.3/hour 12/28 Lambert 9 (1 - 10 pm) 65 7.2/hour 12/29 Lambert 9 (1 - 10 pm) 61 6.7/hour 12/23 Woodcrest 6 (4 - 10 pm) 30 5/hour 12/24 Woodcrest 7 (9 am - 4 pm) 21 3/hour 12/25 Woodcrest CLOSED 12/26 Woodcrest 9 (1 - 10 pm) 21 2.3/hour 12/27 Woodcrest 9 (1 - 10 pm) 43 4.7/hour 12/28 Woodcrest 9 (1 - 10 pm) 45 5/hour 12/29 Woodcrest 9 (1 - 10 pm) 39 4.3/hour HILLVIEW - NO STATISTICS AVAILABLE w 0 MEMO TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL FROM: MARY SAARION, DIRECTOR PARKS, RECREATION AND FORESTRY DATE: OCTOBER 6, 1989 SUBJECT: REQUEST TO DECLARE SURPLUS EQUIPMENT Staff requests Council to declare the old computer that was used for the first computerized registration software in the Parks, Recreation and Forestry Department, as surplus equipment. It is outdated and currently is taking up valuable space. It is not IBM compatible. If declared surplus equipment, staff would pursue finding a buyer for the l_ equipment. Recent inquiries show that its maximum worth is $300 if it functions properly. RECOMMENDATION: Declare the TI Professional Computer surplus equipment and allow staff to sell for the highest price. MS/SL 6 MEMO TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL FROM: MARY SAARION, DIRECTOR PARKS, RECREATION AND FORESTRY DATE: OCTOBER 6, 1989 SUBJECT: SILVER PARK MASTER PLAN Staff recommends this proposal for a schedule of steps in the development of a master plan for Silver View Park. #1 Determire a Planning Body - (October -November). City Council must delegate a planning body who would be responsible for participating in the development of survey question:. These survey question results would be used in the process of developing a master plan for Silver View Park. This body could be the Parks and Recreation Commission or a special task force. #2 DeveloR Survey Questions - (October -November). This would be in coordination with Parks and Recreation Commission, the planning body, City Council and Staff. #3 Format the Survey - (December -January). This would be the responsibility of Decision Resources. #4 Survey Implementation - (February). Also to be done by Decision Resources. #5 Presentation of Survey Results - (March). Decision Resources. #6 Develop a Master Plan - (May -July). The planning body would hold a series of meetings and using the survey results develop a park site plan, funding resource plan and a proposed implementation schedule. #7 Hold Public Hearings - (August). The Parks and Recreation Commission and the City Council would hold public hearings to review the master plan. #8 Approval of Master Plan - (September). City Council would approve the master plan as recommended by the planting body/Parks and Recreation Commission. MS/SL Attachment 4W r- r 71 1 ,• J:'::%:c3.: �>...Cc+�E' v. °>�L"�f e.: 25s•s.>. s �2;;i\3?�:',�R>.:...,..::::.:::...: 71 1 ,• J:'::%:c3.: �>...Cc+�E' v. °>�L"�f e.: 25s•s.>. s �2;;i\3?�:',�R>.:...,..::::.:::...: 46 0 0 MEMO TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNC FROM: CLERK-ADMINISTRATO DATE: OCTOBER 9, 1989 SUBJECT: AQUATICS COORDINATOR POSITION Attached to this memorandum please find a memo from Mary Saarion proposing a change in the Aquatics Coordinator Position to an Athletic Coordinator. Pfary suggests that with the upcoming change at Edgewood and the reduction available pool time, the need for a part-time Aquatics Supervisor as a separate position has diminished. Mary suggests that this position be revised to an Athletic Coordinator position to assume responsibilities for coordinating our various athletic programs with Mary assuming responsibility for the coordination of the aquatics activities. After reviewing this proposal and discussing it with Mary in detail, I would have to agree that based upon changes in our operations as a result of the change at Edgewood, this modification would be appropriate. I also endorse this change due to the fact that our various athletic programs are experiencing substantial increases in demand and enrollment thus requiring greater attention by our staff to ensure that they are successful in every way. The assignment of a part-time person to this area would hopefully guarantee greater success in these programs. It would be my hope that Mary and I could discuss this proposal with the Council at the October to Agenda Session answering any questions you might have and coming to a conclusion regarding the future organization of the department. DFP/MJS MEMO TO: DON PAULEY, CLERK -ADMINISTRATOR i►'" FROM: MARY SAARION, DIRECTOR PARKS, RECREATION AND FORESTRY DATE: SEPTEMBER 29, 1989 SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION FOR PART-TIME POSITION CHANGE FROM AQUATICS TO ATHLETIC COORDINATOR As you are aware, it is most likely that this will be the last year that Edgewood pool t•a be available for day-Litue programming because it is anticipated that Edgewood will became a middle school in tie fall of 1990. At the conclusion of this school year, we will have use of the pool during evening and weekend hours during the school year along with summer daytime hours Monday through Friday. Because this reduction in pool time will decrease the need for a part-time aquatics supervisor, I recommend that the current aquatics coordinator position be revised to an athletic coordinator position. who will assume the aquatics responsibilities? I would resume responsibilities for pool programming. For eight years, I had this responsibility, and can undertake reduced pool programming. Shane, Administrative Assistant, would support me with pool rentals, time sheets, flyers and communications with pool staff. Lakeside Park Beach operations would function as usual. A beach manager would be hired to perform the supervisory needs of the beach lifeguards. These positions are approximately 12 weeks in duration and are budgeted annually. Currently, our Parks and Recreation staff spends a majority of programming time in athletic league and program administration. Athletic coordination is a year-round endeavor which programs adults as well as youth in instructional, recreation and league play. Athletic coordination encompasses many different sports and involves the schools and athletic associations. L13 001� -z- The number of adult and youth athletic programs can be categorized as follows: YOUTH ADULT On -the -Bali T-Ball Men's Softball 8-Ball womens Softball Youth Softball Over-35 Softball Junior Softball 3-Man Basketball Senior Softball 4-Man Football Tennis Lessons Broomball Team Tennis Sandcourt Volleyball Instructional Basketball Horseshoes Floor Hockey Boot Hockey Soccer Marvin Johnson, Jr, has been employed View. He recently P yed as a slimmer intern by the City of Mounds Parks and recent oduated Magna cum laude with a Bachelor of Science Administration from St. Cloud State Univeni degree in Mary has been a real asset to the department, university. This summer He has a great amount of experience and knowledge in athletic pro am and already familiaz with administration. Mary already knows the ge functions of the department. Because he is department operations and because he has experience and knowledge in athletic coordination and administration and because he is support the department in other areas in order to willing to experience, I wish to recommendgain professional growth and Athletic Coordinator. An example of the Positionor the agreementlar and description is of attached along with Maws resume. Recreational programming responsibilities would basically be broken down as shown. Even though we all pitch in and help each other whe Is responsibilities needed, the basic responsibilities would be as indicated. ro P gramming s l -3- PROGRAM RESPONSIBILITIES Shane Mary Mary Jeanette Pre-school: Adult sports School Days Out Sr. Citizen Groups (1) Willy Tilly's Youth sports Summer playgrounds Sr. Citizen Trips & Fox & Geesers Adult tournaments Puppet wagon Outings Bator, After school sports Adult trips Sr. Citizen Special Undys Youth Lips Events Gymnastics Skating rinks Tumbling for Tots Adaptive Activities Danceline Special Events: Adult Fitness Snow Spectacular Bridge Lessons Festival Community Theater Bicycle Rodeo Special Events: Pool Aquatics Program Festival Lakeside Beach Operations _ Snow Spectacular Cooperative Program Offerings: Christmas Parry Ski & Skate Fair Halloween Parry Golf League XC Ski Lessons Community Theater Joint Responsibilities: Picnic kits, party packs, field permits, park use permits. MS/SL tr MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW AND 4 FOR OUTLINING THE DUTIES OF THE CrIYS PART-TIME ATHLETIC COORDINATOR The following memorandum of understanding is hereby entered into between the City of Mounds View and to perform and provide the services of a part-time athletic coordinator which will include, but not be limited to, the following scope and parameters: The primary objective of the part-time athletic coordinator will be to organize, direct implement, and coordinate the Citys athletic program for both adults and children. The major areas of accountability for will be as follows: 1. Responsible for the hiring, supervision and evaluation of all athletic personnel including referees, umpires, instructors, and other related athletic employees. 2. Responsible for planning and marketing opportunities for athletic leagues, instructional programs and tournaments for the participation of community members and others. 3. Responsible for the preparation of schedules for all the adult and youth leagues. I This includes scheduling athletic facilities and ensuring that provisions are made for the preparation of each play facility. 4. Responsible for preparation of all time sheets, resumes, applications, and other written materials as requested by the Director of Parks, Recreation and Forestry. 5. Responsible for establishing and carrying out a quarterly in-house training program for all letic NYSctors tCAncelude, but not be limited to rules, rtification of volunteer youth coaches regulations, safety procedures, and review the general athletic philosophy. 6. Responsible for coordinating with related agencies including, but not limited to municipal recreation departments, NYSCA, USSSA, local MRPA and community groups, civic organizations and local businesses. 7. Direct and coordinate the preparation of a year-round athletic program which will be mailed to all City residents promoting athletic opportunities available through -out the city. g. Oversee a variety of public relations activities designed to make the most effective use of available promotional possibilities through local media, flyers, school announcements, letter correspondence, etc. 9. Coordinate and control facility usage for the City athletic facilities. -2- 04 10. initiate and control all supplies and equipment purchases to replenish existing inventories and provide additional items necessary for effective program implementation and maximum safety for all participating players. 11. Establish necessary policies and procedures required to insure all required paperwork is maintained for the proper and efficient running of the athletic program including preparation of well documented reports that clearly identify existing program activity and extent of participation. The reports should include supporting information identifying accountability for administration of each program and related employee lists, budget allocadons, etc. (Year end report, budget report, quarterly public class evaluations.) In return, for the aforementioned services from the City of Mounds View hereby agrees to the following: 1. Provide reimbursement for the proposed activities at an annual rate of $10,000 per year to be paid in twenty-six equal increments. 2. The work schedule will include four hours per day of office time, 5 days/week. 3. The City will provide office space at the City Hall offices. 4. The status of this position, according to the personnel code, is regular part-time incurring PERA, workers comp and social security deductions. This position would offer 50 percent of group health coverage. The aforementioned memorandum of understanding is hereby entered into on the of between the City of Mounds View and The agreement will be in effect for the period of one year commencing through Hereby agreed to on by: Susan Hankner, Mayor Donald Pauley, Clerk -Administrator Mary Saarion, Director Athletic Coordinator Parks, Recreation and Forestry A 0 MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: City Planner Hren DATE: October 12, 1989 SUBJECT: MOUNDS VIEW SQUARE - HARDEES DEVELOPMENT STAGE AND FINAL STAGE PLANS Paster Enterprises has now applied for development stage and final stage plan approval of the conditional use permit/planned unit development for the entire Mounds View Square site. The site plans and landscaping plans have not changed since the last meeting on October 9, 1989. City Forester Wriskey has reviewed the proposed landscaping plan and has made some comments. Please find Forester Wriskey's memo attached. If you have any additional concerns or recommendations that need to be addressed, this is the time to inform the applicant so that the applicant can make the suggested changes in time for next Monday nights meeting (October 23,1989). MMH/BAC 4 MEMO TO: MICHELLE HREN, CITY PLANNER FROM: RICK WRISKEY, CITY FORESTER DATE: OCTOBER 10, 1989 SUBJECT: LANDSCAPE PLAN - HARDEES The revised landscape plan for the Hardees at Mounds View Square shows most of the requests and improvements talked about at the October 5, 1989 meeting. I would caution, however, agzinst the use of low or spreading evergreens in the parking lot islands because of snow storage and salt. Instead, just a solid mass of a red -flowering spirea should be used with the respective seedless green ash in these areas. If properly installed, a well -mulched and maintained parking island wouldn't need a sprinkler system. Such planting beds should have a darker, fertile soil, cloth fabric on the surface and ample and contained wood chip or bark mulch. No rocks of any kind should be used here. I estimate the cost of landscaping (plants and related materials only) to be about $5,000. Sprinkler system considerations would be an additional add -on. Please contact me with any questions on my above comments. RW/SL Attachment 11 r MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION N0. 267-89 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF MOUNDS VIEW SQUARE DEVELOPMENT STAGE AND FINAL STAGE PLAN REVIEW OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR A HARDEES CONVENIENCE FOOD RESTAURANT, PLANNING CASE No. 276-89 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the requested partial rezoning from B-4 to B-3, conditional use permit/planned unit development to allow more than one principal building on the site and a conditional use permit for the convenience food restaurant o be e0located at the Mounds View Square Shopping Center WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has recommended to the City Council approval of the request as described above per Resolution No. 265-89 approved on the 20th day of September, 1989; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the development and final stage plans; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has determined that the proposed rezoning is in conformance with the Comprehen- sive Plan; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has determined that the development stage and final approvedplans are in conformance with the conceptplan WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the revised landscaping plan submitted September 27, 1989; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed City Forester Wriskey's memo regarding the revised landscaping plan dated September 28, 1989, and determined that additional landscaping is required; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the lighting plan and has determined that it is acceptable; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the sign plan and has determined that it is acceptable. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission recommends to the City Council approval of the development stage and final stage plan review for the conditional use permit/planned unit development for the convenience food restaurant with drive -through facilities contingent upon: RESOLUTION NO. 267-89 PAGE TWO 1. All requirements per Resolution No. 265-89 are complied with. 2. The landscaping along County Road I and Long Lake Road is upgraded based on Staff recommendation in order to provide additional buffering and screening. 3. The landscaping on the north side of the property is reviewed in one year in order to determine its adequacy. 4. The City continue to pursue alternatives to the drainage ponds with all governing agencies. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission directs Staff to forward this resolution to the City Council prior to approval of the minutes. ATTEST: (SEAL) Adopted this 4th day of October, 1989. Chairman City Planner A ` CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA MOUNDS VIEW DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 89-93 MOUNDS VIEW SQUARE - HARDEES RESTAURANT THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into this day of October, 1989, by and between the CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW, County of Ramsey, State of Minnesota, party of the first part, hereinafter called the "City", and Paster Enterprises and Hardees Corporation party of the second part, hereinafter called the "Developer", WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Developer, in consideration of a conditional use permit for a Hardees convenience food restaurant with drive - through facilities and a conditional use permit/planned unit development for the entire Mounds View Square site and the issuance of permits thereof, hereby agrees with the City to perform all of the acts required herein and to conform to all of the conditions set forth as follows: 1. Wherever the word "City" appears herein, it shall mean and include the City of Mounds View and also said City's agents and employees; and wherever the word "Developer" appears herein, it shall mean the developer, and any of its agents and employees. Wherever the words "development site" appear herein, it shall mean the premises described in the following exhibits: Exhibit 1. (site survey dated 10/28/75) Exhibit 2. (Hardees site plan, dated 9/26/89) Exhibit 3. (Mounds View Square site plan dated 9/6/89) �,- Exhibit 4. (landscaping plan dated ) Exhibit 5. (traffic and parking study prepared by Benshoof and Associates dated 9/6/89 and addendum to this report dated 9/20/98) Wherever the words "public improvement" appear herein, it shall mean any improvement defined under Chapter 26.04, Sub. 1, of the Municipal Code, and shall include and not be limited to streets, 1 curbs, and gutters, sanitary sewer and water installations, storm water and drainage installations. 2. This document shall be referred to as the "Development i Contract", and said document cannot be transferred or assigned by the Developer except and with the written permission of the City, granted pursuant to a resolution of the City Council. 3. All improvements required herein to be performed by the Developer shall be constructed and paid for by said Developer pursuant to appropriate permits and approval from any governmental agency, such approval and any environmental assessments or environs mental impact statements required to be obtained by and prepared at the expense of said Developer. 4. All public improvements, if any, required to be construc- ted by the Developer pursuant to this Agreement shall be performed by the Developer with such materials and equipment as required by the City under the direct supervision of the City and shall be in conformance with any and all regulations in force at the time of construction, and the City is hereby granted the right of access to the development site to inspect said construction at such times as the City may direct. 5. The Developer shall, and hereby does, agree to pay when due and before they become delinquent, all valid taxes and assessments, if any, there ever be levied against said development site or portion thereof. 11 to 6.E 6. The City shall not be under any obligation or respon- sibility to act as engineer -consultant to the Developer in any matter related to this Agreement or to any public improvements r required on said site by the City, or to act as inspector and i report to said Developer any defect or failure, hazard or inade- quacy or otherwise relative to said site development; any actual or implied approval by the City in respect to any development shall not serve either to alter or extinguish or to otherwise affect the responsiblity, obligation or liability of the Developer in this. 7. The Developer shall not unnecessarily damage or obstruct I or cause any interference with drainage ways or drainage works located within or adjacent to said development site, or permit its contractor or other agents to do so. 8. The Developer shall not alter any of the public improve- ments located on said site except if and as elsewhere herein provided or as particularly in each instance authorized in writing by the City. 9. Surface drainage to be constructed and approved, before and after construction, by the City Inspection Department, and before an occupancy permit shall be issued for the expansion area. 10. All drainage easements required by the City shall be granted by the Developer, without cost to the City, as required. 11. The Developer agrees to conform to all of the applicable requirements of the Mounds View Municipal Code, as amended from time to time, and particularly Chapters 26, 39, 40, 42, 48, 49, 49A, 59, 60, 61, 62 and 63. 12. Developer herein agrees pursuant to provisions of the Mounds View Municipal Code, Chapter 49.07, Subd. 6, to pay, prior to the approval of the permits required, the expenses incurred by -3- 1 . the City in the processing, review and evaluation of the proposed development and in the inspection of all work performed pursuant to said contract. Such costs shall include but not be limited to i the administrative, legal, and engineering expenses incurred herein, and such other expenses as authorized by said Chapter. 13. Developer agrees that the City can terminate development of the development site or the construction of any building strut- ' tures thereon if in the City Council's opinion the terms of this Development Contract have not been conformed to by the developer and the said Developer herein agrees to cease construction and waives its right of recourse, claim, suit or action against the City. In addition, in the event the Developer fails to conform to the conditions of this Agreement, the City shall be entitled to enforce it pursuant to the terms of this contract and/or the provi- sions of the Mounds View Home Rule Charter, Chapter 26 of the Municipal Code, or applicable Minnesota Statutes. The Developers herein agrees that in the event the City is compelled to enforce any of the provisions of this contract by court action and judgment is rendered in favor of the City, that all costs, disbursements and reasonable attorney's fees will be paid by said Developer, its heirs, successors and assigns. 14. The Developer shall furnish to the City at the time of the execution of this Contract a cash bond, a corporate surety bond, an irrevocable letter of credit or any other negotiable instrument approved by the City Attorney, which the Developer agrees to keep in full force and effect during the term of the obligation created herein in the amount of Dollars, wherein the 4er' -4- City shall be the obligee for the use of the City to guarantee performance by the Developer of all of the terms and conditions of this Contract, in conformance with its terms, and in addition, upon the Developer conforming to the rules, regulations, statutes and ordinances of the City and the Developer agrees that it shall hold the City harmless from all costs and charges and damages that may occur on account of doing of the work specified and for the enforcing of the terns of this Contract or bond, if action is brought hereon, including reasonable attorney's fees, in any case where such action is successfully maintained and for the compliance with the laws appertaining thereto, wherein the bond shall be void, but otherwise shall remain in full force and effect. 15. It is understood and hereby agreed by and between the parties hereto that any plans or data supplied by the City within or adjacent to said development site are approximations only and that the City explicitly does not pretend or guarantee or warrant any such plans or data to be either complete or correct. 16. The Developer shall not unnecessarily create, cause or suffer to exist or to continue to exist, any nuisance or hazard to persons or property within or adjacent to said site by reason of said public improvements, development of the site or other operations in respect thereof or permit its agents, engineers or contractors to do so. 17. When applicable, three complete sets of plans and speci- fications or directions for any public improvement to be constructed on said site, each bearing the certificate and seal of a professional engineer duly registered in the State of Minnesota, shall be sub- mitted to the City well in advance of the time proposed for commenc- ing construction thereof. The City shall have a period of not less -5- than thirty (30) days in which to examine and review the plans and specifications submitted by the Developer and to reply to the quacy or inadequacy of the plans Developer with respect to the ade and specifications. upon final approval of the plan and specifi- cations and within a reasonable time following completion of the sets i installation, the Developer shall furnish and deliver threesets "as built" plans thereof to the City. If. any public imp id site by the City, the necessary ments are to be constructed on sa easements and right of ways shall be granted to the City at the ex- pense of the Developer including the costs of the preparation of the right of way documents and filing. The Developer further o the City any easements or right of ways required agrees to grant t pment site, at no cost to the over, under and across the develo City, for the maintenance and accessibility to any public improve- ll ment constructed on the development site. The Developer tshaCity, of he establish permanent reference marks, to the approval in convenient and readily accessible locations wherever said public improvements are constructed on the development site. 18. In the case of a multiple dwelling, commercial or indus- trial development or any use combining any of the aforesaid uses, the Developer agrees on behalf of itself, its heirs, successors or bed herein pursuant assigns to permanently maintain the site descri to the terms of this development contract and all agreements said Developer shall not permit the subsequently entered into, and premises to deteriorate or become blighted or to constitute a public nuisance, and shall not permit its users or occupants to create a public nuisance. Enforcement of this provision shall be pursuant to the terms of this contract or the provisions of the 1 -6- applicable Minnesota Statutes, the Mounds View Home Rule Charter, and the Municipal Code. In the event of nonconformance by the Developer, the City shall seek mandatory relief, after written notice of the alleged violations, pursuant to the terms of this Contract to enforce this provision and may prcceed to abate public nuisances and to assess the cost of said abatement, including all Costs, disbursements, legal fees against the development site, as provided for in the Home Rule Charter, Chapter 26 of the Municipal Code, and such other applicable ordinances and Minnesota Statutes. 19. The development site shall be developed as indicated on the attached site plan, referred to as Exhibit 2. The site plan and the development to be constructed thereon may be amended from time to time by the mutual written consent of the parties hereto, in conformance with the Municipal Code of the City. 20. In addition to all of the provisions recited herein - before, the Developer agrees to the following conditions as more iully set out in Attachment A attached hereto and made a part hereof. contract are severable, and in 21. The provisions of this the event that any provision of this agreement if found invalid, the remaining provisions shall remain in full force and effect. - 7 - I This agreement is made and executed purusant to and under authority of Resolution No. adopted by the City the day of , 1989, and by resolution or authorized signature of the Developer. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed these presents the day and year first above written. CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW By Its Mayor By Its Clerk-Administrtor DEVELOPER: Paster Enterorises By Its Hardees Corporation By Its Approved as to form and the excecution this day of , 1989: City Attorney to STATE OF MINNESOTA) 55. COUNTY OF ) On this _ day of ' , 19 before me i appeared and. — .. the Mayor and Clerk -Administrator, respectfully, of the City of Mounds View, County of Ramsey, State of Minnesota, a municipal corporation; that the seal affixed to the foregoing instrument is the corporate seal of the corporation, and that the said instrument was executed on behalf of the corporation by authority of its council, and that they acknowledge said instrument to be the free act and deed of the corporation. CORPORATE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FOR DEVELOPER STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss. COUN':Y OF ) On this day of , 19 before me appeared anu of a corporation, that the seal affixed to the foregoing instrument is the corporate seal of the corporation, and that the said instrument was executed on behalf of the corporation by authority of its Board of Directors, and that they acknowledge said instrument to be the free act and deed of the corporation. INDIVIDUAL ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FOR DEVELOPER STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss. COUNTY OF ) On this day cf , 19 , before me personally appeared to me personally known to be the persons des L_i'beea herein and also who executed the foregoing Development Contract and acknowledged that he executed the same as free act and deed. -9- DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 89-93 ATTACHMENT A II In addition to the foregoing conditions, the Developer agrees to the following: 1. The Developer shall be responsible for the maintenance of landscaping on the site in the same or similar condition as approved in the 'development site' plans as outlined on page one (1) of this Development Agreement. 2. The Developer shall maintain the existing sprinkler system so as to be in proper working order at all times. 3. The Developer shall install and maintain at the Developer's expense the sprinkling system that has been extended to the landscaped islands in the p S l 4. Weather permitting, deliveries tobusinees Restauranhours inorder shall not take place during peak to maintain adequate circulation. 5. Required landscaping improvements along Lake Lake Road will be installed at such time the Long Lake Road improvements are completed adjacent to this site. At such time the road is completed, the landscaping twill ted fbe done in accordance with a landscaping p lan or review and approval by City Staff and the City Council. FOR THE CITY: Date: FOR THE DEVELOPER: Date: 0 ,(-tA,� /o MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: City Planner Hren DATE: October 12, 1989 SUBJECT: 7801 SUNNYSIDE ROAD - OFFICE BUILDING Mr. Gordon Bayerkohler has petitioned the City Council for an address change of his office building at 7801 Sunnyside Road. Mr. Bayerkohler would like to have a Highway 10 address. The front door of the office building faces Highway 10. file for this property, it was noted that Upon reviewing the there has been problems witalcforothenchangeeto anofficeplan that was part of the approval regarding this building. There were a number of correspondence 8 from issue in the file . The last memo landscapiated ng2to date �had not Planner e. I inspecteddtheaproperty today and took pictures to been done. p in It appears that Mr. Bayerkohler has document the pliedlandswith 9• requirement. still not complied with the landscaping Staff is looking for direction at this time as to the appropriate ordinance to prepare for this request. MMH/BAC Enclosure n 10-6-89 giUIt7,2 , a Don Fauley �r L Clerk -Administrator City of Moundsview j 2401 Hwy 10 SW`` Moundsview,Mn 55112 �h.�,,,:,,'.• n RE: Address Change on 7801 SunnySide Office Building. Dear Mr. Pauley: The office building at 7801 SunnySide Road, is adjacent to the Crown Auto store on Hwy 10 in Moundsview. The front door on the 7801 Office Building faces Hwy 10. The businesses housed in the 7801 SunnySide office building have expressed an interest in getting the mailing address changed to identify with Hwy 10. The Hwy 10 address would give their business clients an easier way of identifying the location of the businesses. Would you please bring this up to City Council in the October sessi i to get approval to change the address. Thank you. If you need additional information,please call me at 434-4744. Your Truly, �oL Gordon C Bayerkohler Owner MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council 9 FROM: City Planner Hren DATE: October 12, 1989 SUBJECT: AMOCO CAR WASH, 2155 HIGHWAY AVENUE PLANNING CASE NO. 241-88 In September of 1988, Amoco was granted a conditional use permit to add a car wash to their site at 2155 Highway Avenue. That permit e.coired on September 26, 1989. Amoco Oil Company has now reapplied for that conditional use permit. Amoco Oil Company has submitted the same plans that were once approved by the City. Please find enclosed a staff memorandum to the Planning Commission regarding the issuance of a new conditional use permit at this time. Because the site conditions have not changed, the planning reports that were done in 1988 are still applicable. Staff is looking for direction at this time as to the appropriate resolution to prepare for this request. MMH/BAC Enclosure rMEMO TO: Planning Commission FROM: City Planner Hren DATE: October 3, 1989 SUBJECT: AMOCO OIL CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, PLACNING CASE NO. 241-88 Please find enclosed correspondence and planning reports that were done regarding the subject conditional use permit at the time this request was originally moving through the process. Also enclosed is Resolution No. 2374 that was approved by the City Council regarding this request. Section 40.25, Subd. C(5), addresses lapse of conditional use permit by non-use. Whenever, within one year after granting a conditional use permit, the work as permitted by the permit shall not have been completed then such permit shall become null and void unless a petition for extension of time in which to complete the work has been granted by the City Council. Amoco's conditional use permit expired on September 26, 1989. At this time Amoco is proposing to reapply for the same conditional use permit with the exact same site plan and conditions imposed on the conditional use permit previously. It is of the opinion of Staff, because the conditional use permit was granted at one time and the applicant is applying for the same permit with the same conditions and nothing new has been added or changed on the site or on the site plans, that the proposal is in conformance with the City Code. MMH/BAC ITEM 3 i i MEMO TO: Clerk -Administrator and City Council FROM: City Planner Berman DATE; September 1, 1988 SUBJECT: AMOCO OIL COMPANY REQUEST FOR A CAR WASH AT 2155 HIGHWAY AVENUE, PLANNING CASE NO. 241-88 The Planning Commission, after much review of the Amoco proposal, recommends approval of a car wash to be added to the 2155 Highway Avenue site. The site plan was forwarded to the City Council in the Planning Commission packet for August 3. The City Engineer has reviewed the site plan for both internal and external traffic circulation. The stacking for the car wash was also reviewed and meets the Code requirements, so long as the car wash cycle is six minutes as indicated on the site plan. Apparently, the car wash cycle can be set to a specified time and the six -minute cycle will allow Amoco to meet the stacking requirement. This will have to be monitored intermitently to ensure compliance. The conditions placed upon the car wash are adopted from the J conditional use permit for the Amoco station on Highway 10. The applicant has voiced the opinion that a blower system would not be needed on this site, especially with the longer than average six -minute wash cycle. I spoke with the City Engineer who felt that if one was required at Silver Lake Road, one should be used at Program Avenue. Program Avenue will become a well -traveled road when the Busihess Park is completed with much of that traffic being truck traffic. It is believed that an icing concern is pertinent in this instance. The car wash facility and proposed signage conforms to the requirements of the Zoning Code. A resolution of approval is attached for your review and a public hearing is set for September 12. KH/BAC Attachment 40 MEMO TO: Planning Commission FROM: City Planner Herman DATE: July 15, 1988 SUBJECT: AMOCO OIL COMPANY CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A CAR WASH AT 2155 HIGHWAY AVENUE, PLANNING CASE NO. 241-88 Attached is a revised site plan which Amoco has submitted. In reviewing this site plan I used the previous Planning Commission memo to see if all issues listed had been addressed. The 30 foot setback, the parking requirements, and the principal structure issue have all been satisfactorily met. We have not received the requested information on the si lighting. This information will have to be supplied approvals are given. pplied beforeeanyd The City Engineer has reviewed the circulation of the revised plan. He feels that the internal circulation is not especially if cars entering the northern pumps wish t car wash. There is not enou h gad, directly into the car wash. g room to allow the ° enter the stacking. This also raises the question to ogo n 9• The code specifies in Chapter 40.18 question of car "magazining or stacking space is constructed to (accommodate that number of vehicles which can be washed during a maximum thirty (30) minute period and shall be subject to the approval of the City Engineer". It is my recollection that Amoco stated that 6 vehicles could q through the car wash in a 30-minute period. The site enough room to stack 3 vehicles without blockingthe e o Clifton Drive. Additional stacking room would be plan ahpws the requirements of the Code. I have requested City on write a memo regardingneeded to meet internal traffic circulationonclrns about stackingy Engineer Wednesday's meeting, plan to and athishat KH/BAC MEHORANDUM Hemo To : Kim Herman, City Planner From : R. A. Minetor, City Engineer Date : July 15, 1988 Subject : Proposed Amoco Car Wash I have reviewed the proposed site plan for this dovelopment. As we discussed, the city code requires a vehicle stacking area to accommodate 6 vehicles. Tho current layout does not appear to meet this criteria. Additionally, the necessary maneuvering is insufficient for cars attempting to enter the wash bay from the Closest pumps.. Because of the internal circulation problem and the 'stacking' requirement, this proposal does not appear to meet the intent of our code. My major concern is the likelihood of vehicle 'stacking' across the entrance from Clifton. The internal circulation needs to be considered and measures taken to remedy the conflict between vehicles using the western pumps and the vehicles 'stacking' for the car wash. If the applicant wishes, he may re -submit this proposal with an internal circulation plan and 'stacking' area which is consistent with the code. A ^ MEMO TO: Planning Commission FROM: City Planner Herman DATE: June 17, 1988 SUBJECT: AMOCO OIL COMPANY CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A CAR WASH AT 2155 HIGHWAY AVENUE PLANNING CASE NO. 241-88 In reviewing the proposal for the gas station, Staff has looked Into the question regarding two structures being on one lot. In Chapter 40.04, Subd. C(4) it states that "except in the case of a planned unit developments as provided for in Section 40.24 of this Code, not more than one (1) principal building shall be located on a lot". Therefore, Amoco's current proposal does not conform to Code because the car wash and gas station building are separate buildings. However, in 40.04, Subd. F(1), it states that "an accessory building shall be considered a integral part of the principal building if it is connected to the principal building by a covered passageway". I believe that if a covered passageway was proposed, that the two buildings could be considered one principal building per this section of the Code. In reviewing the file for the Amoco Station, in a memo from Steve Rose in 1981, it states that the parking spaces required are a total of 10. This would be 6 spaces for the convenience food store and 4 for the gas station. On the original site plan for the proposal, 8 spaces were shown where the parking spaces are currently shown on the newly proposed development with 2 in the northwest corner where the car wash is proposed to go. This would mean that the site plan would have to be revised to allow for 2 additional parking spaces. In regard to the question if a blower system should be included as a condition on the permit, the Planning Commission should look at the affect upon Program Avenue. The traffic on Program Avenue will be increasing as the Business Park develops. It is believed that Program Avenue will be a major access road for tenants in the large TransHealth building and the building directly to the south. In terms of the circulation on the Amoco site, the cars after being washed will be exiting directly onto Program Avenue. According to Chapter 40.05, Yard Requirements, in a B-3 zone a side yard is 10 feet unless the lot is on a corner in which there is a 30 foot setback. This would require the car wash to be set back an additional 15 feet from the Program Avenue lot line. In reviewing the files, I could not find any comment on the question about non -conformity on the sign at the Amoco Station. Therefore, it is unclear that the sign is non -conforming. Planning Commission ~ June 17, 1988 Page 2 • Additional information would 6e needed in the site and the lighting for the site. at the Ju terms of the signage on total ne 15th meeting. The Staff hwSe requests were signage currently on the site ould to knowthe car wash to ensure and what is need foot limit. that the site is not exceeding proposed for the has also t- A lighting Plan which shows the its 100 requested. existing square g lighting KH/BAC M STAFF REPORT PLANNING COM11ISSION REVIEW DATE: June 15, 1986 AGENDA ITEH NUMBER: 5 (Work Session) CASE NUMBER: 241-88 APPLICANT: Amoco Oil. Company Founds view. . PROPOSED REQUEST: Applicant requests to install a automatic car wash, and therefore, requires a conditional use permit. LOCATION OF REQUEST: 2155 Highway Avenue Attached is a site plan which illustrates the applicant's request to install a car wash system on -site. The proposed car wash appears to be in conformance with the City Code in terms of setback, parking, etc. The City Engineer has reviewed the drawing and feels that there is not a traffic problem nor a stacking problem. The City has not been informed by the Amoco Company regarding the number of vehicles that can be washed within a thirty -minute period. This information would be needed per the Code which requires specific stacking space. The resolution approved by the City Council for the Amoco station on Highway, 10 is included for your information. The conditions Placed upon it, in general, are for the gas station; although there are some conditions that are specifically for the car wash. These may items that you would wish to include in the resolution if approving this car wash. Staff awaits direction on this issue. JI i is v .M•a n.•t N`, •��.� �/.1�. "'ri'Z$.r���vm -- �x.-e -en: sm••%•i�'.`•.��n•.a.•.r.•rs�ar •OI on of � r„.r....1 tir..+.1 i t We �:14 sgl+ f-------+-------------- t 1 j � , ---- C � ., IY-_.. i f ------ to" 2155 Highway Ave. moo Mounds View Planning Commission August 17, 1988 Regular Meeting Page Two ------------------------------------------------------------------------- It was noted there was no one present to represent 6. Consideration the applicant. of Resolution No. 231-88, Motion/Second: Burgers/Zollner to approve Resolution Minor Subdivi- No. 231-88, recommending approval of a minor sub- sion Request division at 8138 Groveland Road, Planning Case No. for 8138 248-88. Groveland Roa 4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carrik It was noted there was no one present to represent 7. Consideration the applicant, of Draft Ordi- nance Regardir City .Planner Herman reported she had no additional Code Appeal information to present to the Planning Commission. and Resolutior No. 232-88 for Motion/Second: Zollner/Saunders to adopt Ordinance 2548 Highway No. 448, amending the Municipal Code of Mounds View by amending Chapter 40 entitled "Zoning", and adopt Resolution No. 232-88, recommending approval of a conditional use permit for a pet store at 2548 Highway 10, Silver View Plaza. 4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carrier City Planner Herman reported she had no additional 8. Consideration information to present to the Planning Commission. of Resolution No. 233-88, Jim and Linda Philippi, of North Star Engineering, Conditional Ut reported they were representing the applicant. Permit Reques by Amoco Oil City Planner Herman clarified that she had spoken Company, 2155 with the City Engineer concerning the blower issue, Highway Avenu. and since it was required at a similar business at Planning Case Highway 10 and Silver Lake Road, and there are No. 241-88 enough similarities between the two, it should be required here. Chairman Mountin clarified the issue of stacking is no longer an issue, as it has been cleared up with the City Engineer, who now considers it acceptable. City Planner Herman clarified the number of parking spaces which would be required. Mr. Philippi stated they feel the primary exit will be out onto Highway 10, and the increased distance from the exit, along with the additional cycle time, will allow more water to drip off the cars, and they ( do not feel a dryer is necessary. Other that than issue, they have no objections to the Commission's Resolution. Mounds View Planning Commission Regular Meeting -------------------------------- Motion/Second: Burger/Saunders to adopt Resolution No. - , recommending approval of the Amoco Oil Company development request, 2155 Highway Avenue, Planning Case No. 241-88. 4 ayes 0 nays City Planner Herman had no report. Chairman Mountin explained the Planning Commission had been unable to call to order for the regular meet- ing on August 3 due to the uncertainty of their empowerment, as they were below the required member- ship of a full Commission. She added the City Council has clarified the issue and stated a quorum will consist of the majority of appointed members, even though it is not a complete Planning Commission. Chairman Mountin reported she had been contacted by a resident at Woodale and Silver Lake Road, who may be coming before the Planning Commission to discuss Options for her property. Chairman Mountin adjourned the meeting at 8:02 PM. Respectfully submitted, Kimberly Herman City Planner August 17,• i988 Page Three 00) Motion Carries' 9. Staff Report 10. Chairman's Report 11. Adjournmel., Mounds View City Council Rogular Meeting ---------------------------------- September 12, 1988 Page Three --------------------------------- �` Mayor Linke closed the regular meeting and opened the 8. Public second public hearing at 7:30 PM. Hearing: Ordinance City Planner Herman reviewed the proposed additions No. 448 to Chapter 40, to allow for pet stores, which had not been covered by the Code. She read the conditions that would apply, which are similar to those placed on the veterinary clinic. Mayor Linke closed the public hearing at 7:32 and reopened the regular meeting. Mayor Linke closed the regular meeting and opened the 9. Public third public hearing at 7:32 PM. Hearing: Consideratic City Planner Herman explained the conditions set in of Request f the conditional use permit are the same as those just CUP by Ronal reviewed for the Code amendment in the previous Holt, 2540 public hearing. She added the conditional use permit Highway 10 would not be allowed until the ordinance has been approved with both readings. Mayor Linke closed the public hearing and reopened the regular meeting at 7:34 PM. Mayor Linke closed the regular meeting and opened 10. Public next public hearing at 7:34 PM. Hearing: Consideratic City Planner Herman clarified the location of the of Request f existing Amoco station. CUP for Amoc 2155 Highway Jim Phillipi,.of North Star Engineering, representing Avenue Amoco Oil Company, reviewed their proposal for adding a car wash to the existing facility, and he reviewed the site plan, covering parking, stacking and signage. Mr. Phillipi stated he had gone through the Staff report and the only question he has concerns the re- quirement for blowers. He explained that with the six minute cycle time, and the length of driveway before cars would exit onto the roadway, they did not feel there would be a problem with water dripping off the cars. Mayor Linke asked if there were any drainage problems with the car washnext door. City Planner Herman replied she had checked with the engineer, and there were not. �T Councilmember Hankner asked if there would be a problem with raising the level of rust in water in the residential areas with the increased use of water in that area. Mounds view City Council September 12, 1988 Regular Meeting Page Four -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. Phillipi replied there should not be, as they !+ would only be using a 1h" water service, and using 18 gallons per cycle. Clerk/Administrator Pauley added the water main that services the area does not get to the residential area until after is passes Amoco. He added there is not a build up problem there, and the 18 gallons per cycle would not be a significant increase in what is used already with all the surrounding businesses. Mayor Linke closed the public hearing at 7:41 PM. Mayor Linke closed the regular meeting and opened the 11: Public last public hearing at 7:41 PM. Hearing: 1988 Long Clerk/Administrator Pauley explained the purpose of Term Financia having a five year plan, to assist the City in budget- Plan ing for major purchases that are not needed on an annual basis, and he reviewed the 1988 long term plan. Mayor Linke added that it is very helpful to the City to be able to preplan for the large purchases. Mayor Linke closed the public hearing and reopened the regular meeting at 7:44 PM. pp�. Mayor Linke read the proclamation for "Kids Day", on 12. Proclamation September 24, and he explained the intent behind the Kids Day, proclamation, encouraging children to grow up to be September 24, a helpful part of society. 1988 Mayor Linke requested that Item F be removed from the 13. Approval of consent agenda. Consent Agenda Clerk/Administrator Pauley read the items on the pro- posed consent agenda. Motion/Second: Blanchard/Hankner to approve the consent agenda, minus Item F, and waive the reading of the resolutions. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carrie Mayor Linke asked for a clarification of Item F. Clerk/ Administrator Pauley apologized and explained it had been typed incorrectly, and it would actually be to approve pay estimate No. 7 to C. W. Houle for the County Road I improvements, to be charged to the County Road I J project account. Mounds view City Council Regular Meeting ----------------------------------------------------- Clerk/Administrator pauley replied Staff was aware of that and would look into it. Councilmember Quick suggested highlighting the street maintenance program in the next newsletter. He stated he has received questions on why things were done as they were. Councilmember Hankner reprted the fence along the walkway the City owns across from Edgewood is in horrible shape and is an eye sore, and requested it be fixed up, as it is City property. Councilmember Hankner brought up the issue of garage sale signs. They have been discussed in the past and while it was agreed it is difficult to enforce, some Cities do prohibit their placement on utility poles. Attorney Karney advised that unless someone is actually observed to be putting a sign up, it is next to impossible to prove they did it, or to get a conviction. Clerk/Administrator Pauley directed City Planner Herman to research the issue, in conjunction with the sign code update the Planning Commission will be doing. Councilmember Wuori had no report. Councilmember Quick had no report. Councilmember Blanchard had no report. Mayor Linke advised the representatives of Amoco Oil Company that their request had been acted on earlier in the meeting and he advised that while it did pass, several comments were made by the Council and he suggested Amoco make arrangements to view the video tape of the meeting. Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported the Library Board has requested a meeting with the Council concerning the on -going issue of acquiring the Long Lake Road site for the Mounds View library. He reviewed the dates offered by the Board and it was agreed by the Council to meet with them at the Roseville Library at 7 PM on Monday, October 17. Since that is a regular agenda night, the Council will call to order at 6 PM, adjourn to go to Roseville and meet with the Board, and then reconvene at City Hall if there is further business to complete. September 26, 1988 Page Five ------------------ Councilmember Wuori Councilmember Quick Councilmember Blanchard Mayor Linke 19. Report of Clerk/ Administrator RESOLUTION NO. 2374 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REQUEST BY AMOCO OIL COMPANY, 2155 HIGHWAY AVENUE, PLANNING CASE NO. 241-88 WHEREAS, Amoco Oil Company has requested City approval to construct a self-service car wash at 2155 Highway Avenue in the City of Mounds View; and WHEREAS, the development, as proposed, requires a condi- tional use permit and development approval; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the follow- ing documents regarding this development proposal: 1) Site Plan 2) Signage Plan WHEREAS, the City Council and Planning Commission have determined that the development proposal is in conformance with the requirements of Chapter 40. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of 1 the City of Mounds View approves the conditional use permit with J the following conditions: 1) The facility must, at all times, be in compliance with State Laws and Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Standards for air quality and noise. 2) The car wash facility shall include a blower system designed to remove as much water as feasible from the vehicle before it is allowed to exit the facility. This equipment shall operate as a customer option from April 16 to October 14 and as a mandatory service from October 15 through April 15. 3) The conditional use permit and the conditions placed upon it be recorded on the title with the County Recorder's Office. Adopted this ATTEST:% (SEAL) 26th day o` E RESOLUTION NO. 268-89 -CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUEST BY AMOCO OIL COMPANY, 2155 HIGHWAY AVENUE, PLANNING CASE No. 241-88 WHEREAS, Amoco Oil Company has requested City approval to construct a self-service car wash at 2155 Highway Avenue in the City of Mounds View; and WHEREAS, the development, as proposed, requires a condi- tional use permit and development approval; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the follow- ing documents regarding this development proposal: 1) Site Plan 2) Signage Plan WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has determined that the development proposal is in conformance with the requirements of, Chapter 40. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission once reviewed and approved the conditional use permit per Resolution No. 233-88, adopted on August 17, 1988. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Mounds View approves the conditional use permit with the following conditions: 1) The facility must, at all times, be in compliance with State Laws and Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Standards for air quality and noise. 2) The car wash facility shall include a blower system designed to remove as much water as feasible from the vehicle before it is allowed to exit the facility. This equipment shall operate as a customer option from April 16 to October 14 and as a mandatory service from October 15 through April 15. 3) The conditional use permit and the conditions placed upon it be recorded on the title with the County Recorder's Office. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission directs Staff to forward this resolution to the City Council "' prior to approval of the minutes. RESOLUTION NO. 268-89 PAGE TWO ATTEST: (SEAL) Adopted this 4th day of October, 1989. Chairman City P anner 00 MEMO TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: CLERK-ADMINISTRATO DATE: OCTOBER 2, 1989 SUBJECT: ANOKA COUNTY-BLAINE AIRPORT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PROCESS Attached please find a letter this office received from Nigel D. Finney, Deputy Executive Director -Planning and Environment of the Metropolitan Airports Commission regarding an assessment of environmental effects relating to construction projects at the Anoka County -Blaine Airport. Mr. Finney provides us with a copy of the assessment and advises us that a hearing will be held on the evening of October 17, 1989 at the Metropolitan Airports Commission General Offices. As you may recall, the City Council has previously taken the position of having no objection to the capital improvements proposed by the Commission during the Metropolitan Council's review. Staff would request any Council comments like to have directed to the Commission environmental effects of these proposed improvements. DFP/MJS which you would regarding the capital �tpaD.�s • Sa,t Pau; -r METROPOLITAN AIRPORTS COMMISSION P. 0. BOX 11700 TWIN CITY AIRPOFIT MINNESOTA 55111 PHONE (612) 720.1892 September 22, 1989 Donald Pauly, Clerk Administrator City of Moundsview 2401 Highway 10 Moundsview MN 55432 r RE: Environmental Review Process MAC - Capital Improvement Program 1990.1996 Anoka County -Blaine Airport Dear Mr. Pauly: In accordance with the requirements of Minnesota Statutes 1986, Chapter 473, amended by Minnesota Statutes 1988, Chapter 664, the Metropolitan Airports Commission is required to conduct an Assessment of Environmental Effects for projects in the Commission's seven-year Capital Improvement Program (1990-1996) for airports included in its system. A copy of the Assessment of Environmental Effects relating to construction projects on Anoka County -Blaine is enclosed for your review. Comments concerning the 1990-1996 Capital Improvement Program involving Anoka County -Blaine Airport can be given at a public hearing to be held on October 17, 1989, at 7:00 pm at the MAC General Offices, 6040 28th Avenue South, Minneapolis, MN 55450 or in writing to the Metropolitan Airports Commission at the above mentioned address. The comment period ends on October 31, 1989. Sincerely, Nigel D. Finney Deputy Executive Director -Planning and Environment cc: EQB Mail List ERP/MR . _ .- :•1-5:41 ]311i ?`/E. 50.—.N?5' f?R'dIN:L AP - MEMO CONCERNING CRYSTAL, LAKE ELMO. AND ANOKA COUNTY AIRPORTS Minnesota Statutes 1986. Chapter 473, amended by Minnesota Statutes 1988, not prepare an assessment for Chapter 664 states that "The commission need and plan for that airport an airport when the capital improvement program the ous year or hwill ienvironmental hen the changes effects." ehave ponlyte trivial in theoprogrameand plan For the Crystal, Lake Elmo, and AnokaAarports the ly County Blaiis nor ne maintenance change from plans adopted last year tharehabilitation "Equipment Fuel Tank Replacement" for $25,000. This item is and removal of existing tanks which may item involves the study possible fuel leaks and replacing or upgrading the tanks to meet new have Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) standards. The only environmental impact of this action would be slightly positive due of the to increased groundwater protection. Therefore, for the purposes above airports is Judged to s k_ statute, the Capital Improvement Plan for the effects, and an Assessment of Environmental :t have only trivial environmental Effects will not be prepared for these airports this year. it- 517d CAP JAL CAP I JAI IMPROVEMENT IMPROVEMENT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN PROJECTS PROGRAM PROJECTS 1990 1991 1992 1991 199/ 1995 1996 IELIIVEI AIRPORTS CITSIAtl Euolrinl Modlflntlaeu 200,000 150,000 Equip. /ldf. Fwl lank Replccernt 2s,000 EqulpRmt Illlnlerunse lu11ding 250,(40 ►avement Rehabilitation 125,000 150,000 300.000 Is0,000 CRYSTAL 1111fOlAt1 525,000 425.000 150,000 0 500,000 0 150,0W1 AttOCA CCMIT-IiA1NEt lulldlq Area Dsnlyrnt 1 5D0 000 Disposal Are@ Clever 25.CA0 Duch Cleaning 50,000 Equip. lido. fuel lank Replacement 25,000 Pavement Rehabilitation 250.000 150,000 200,000 Road Construction for 8/26 Ealrndon 950,000 suvay LIM Reconstruction I Extension 1,500,000 Security lencing 100,000 Nled Corm, Replactnnt 2$,000 ANORA CaWY-BLAIRE SOSIOIALS 2,D5D,000 125, 000 1,300,000 150,000 0 2•�0,000 0 LACE FEW Equip. Iidg. Fmt unl leplveaent 25.0m North lullditp Are, Oeveloprent 250,000 Pavement Iehabllllatlm 200,000 100,000 200,000 200,000 Security lancing 100,000 100,000 IACf F1110 1I110101Alf 200,000 725,000 200, 000 0 200, 000 0 200,000 MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council j r FROM: City Planner Hren DATE: October 11, 1989 SUBJECT: SOLID WASTE COLLECTION The Mounds View curbside recycling program has been underway for quite some time now and resident interest is still strong. Many metropolitan cities are now moving to new ways of collecting solid waste from the residents. At this time, City Staff has looked at the options the City Council has before them with regard to collection of solid waste in the City of Mounds View. Currently, the City has a curbside recycling collection program as well as licensing of garbage haulers as a separate function. A number of cities are moving to a system known as organized garbage collection and a number of other cities are licensing their haulers to require them to collect garbage and recycle materials and yard waste. Please find enclosed as part of this packet a study of organized refuse collection prepared by the Metropolitan Council in June of 1985. I have pulled the section dealing with the pros and cons from that report for your quick and easy reference. The findings of that report with regard to organized collection are applicable to the City of Mounds View as well. The costs and savings figures, however, would differ due to the size of Mounds View. The idea of licensing garbage haulers to require them to pick up garbage, recyclables, and yard waste is new to the metropolitan area. Currently, a number of the cities, which include Eden Prairie, Eagan and potentially St. Anthony, are using the system of licensing haulers. Please find enclosed Eden Prairie's and St. Anthony's ordinance which addresses the issue of licensing haulers and their responsibility to collect recyclables and yard waste in addition to the regular garbage waste. Please find enclosed for your reference a copy of White Bear Lake's Organized Collection System Contract. Please find enclosed a table outlining what Staff feels are the City's options at this point with regard to solid waste collection in the City of Mounds View. The table outlines pros and cons of each option. Tt ehn. ,ln Y.. ....«.,d that Lhe City Of Mounds View's contract with Ramsey Recycling, Inc. expires on December 31, 1989. The contract does have a renewal clause in it. At this time, Staff is looking for some direction from the City Council as to which route is the desired direction. Obviously, there are details that would need to be worked out with any one of the three options, however, in order to narrow the research, again, we would like some specific direction on how to proceed. MMH/BAC Enclosures CAR ORGANIZED COLLEC ION REDUCE ENVIAURMSli,LL .rnt:+ a PUBLIC A E4Y? Organized collection does reduce nuisance impacts associated with sev- eral refuse collectors picking up waste on the same block. Organized e collection reduces wear and tear on roads and improves air auallty because fuel consumption is reduced. Organizd collection improves public safety because fewer miles are traveled by garbage trucks thereby decreasing the potential for accidents. The expected life of any street or alley surface is related to the traf- fic which is carried by the street or alley. The roadway surface is particularly affected by heavy wheel loads. The erract an a roacway CT One refuse truck is equivalent t0 1,:00 automobiles. This figure has been documented by the Research Section of the i4lnnesota Department of Transoortaticn (un/DOT) and is currently used by Mn/COT in street anc highway design. In its organized collection effor:S, St. piul estimated to what deIgree the life of a street can be extended if refuse collection '-mere Organ- ized. The city assumed that if Under the current system, where each household arranges for collection, traffic 'volume en a given street is 500 cars per day and five refuse "ticks per week, the ecaivalent traf- fic on the street amounts to 11,:CO cars per week. Under an organized collection system with only one .refuse tru-c:k per 'week, the equivalent traffic On the street is S,CCO cars per week. The cpmpdrisari shows that the effect on the roadway by triif'c may be substantially reduced. Realistically, all streets might Mt last substantially longer under an organized collection system because roadway life is de:endent "pan many other factors than trarfic. However, trafr,c does have a si;nlfican: effect upon roadway life. These addit.'Onal roadway costs are externei costs passed an the the city as a c9nsacuence of each household irrang- ina for refuse count:Tan. The reduced mileage that -efJsa trucks travel can reduce the p0 tertial .lumbar of accidents invol'virg garbage trucks. Reducing the number miles gaveled by aarbage trucks reduces traffic ccngestian and may reduce tv`e nurber of accidents. Emissions of air pollutants would be reduced because garbage trucks would reduce total milaage, the preclse reduction in Pollutd.lts as a result 'Of moving to an organized co•iar-ion system is difficult tc oredict because there are be:h gasaline and diesal powered cOilec:ion vehicles, and it is difficult to estimate the reduction in traffic Congestion and :riles traveled by garbage trucks that would. be achieved by organized collection. The emission rates of pollutants 'vary accarc- iny to the screed of :he vehicle 'wits •:pre emissions at lower speeds. :.missions of Importance include hydrocartons, carron :-enoxide and nitrogen oxides. 'envy duty :iesai trJckS also emit par:Iculatas, sulfur oxides, aldehydes and organic acids. Of particular concern are ines contain POlY- nucleariate aromaatticshydrocarbonsdiesel (PAH)nwhich arebecause knownhcarcinogens. ,I. O} Organized collection is one of several methods that could improve neighborhood aesthetics. It could eliminate the unsightliness of containers set out for collection sometimes every day of the week on some blacks. Organized collection could discourage illegal dumping and stockpiling of unwanted and unsightly items in backyards because the costs of removal are generally extra where a household arranges for pilingtcouldicontribute toupublicRhealtheducin9andesafety dumping and stock- � G �G,,' RovA etrapallia� fi individual S There are four potential ?iabiitties ar disadvantagesan to organized collection of refuse. Organized collection reduces ni issues and could potentially adversely affect choice of garbage caitec:ors, requires additional municipal involve - Collection broaches anti-trust existing refuse Callection companies. Households that currently arrange with a hauler for refuse Choice, This the raulerlofinheindividuals more would no longer be able .o select. a survey by runs counter to the nat;Qvejdaf`szratcespdas{��? 8 Marev29, ??85, choice in the type and the Minnesota Carter far 5acial Research comp'- z en let thosshowe res�ondeassdAhapnowtselarfor , theirgarbagel canthaulerhwillingcent of the city decide, although some agree aniy it it reduces their cost. about 11 Percent of the population, or There was a s�all minority, e hauler, wanted to retain i`e^;iry their �cancerns. about 20 percent of the respondents who selec:zd their The gar. Rho felt strongly that they gastzd that 'his group he studied further to more involve^. in r ?:se nausz'noIds ardubus- Organizad collection will require municiaain raf with unorganized refuse collection to become if:i- 3ecause there is a great deal of satisfaction nnand Tresses about the ma.^.ner jr. which rersa is hanE?=_d, iis t may be d 'If it gin t broke, cult to explain why additional coverrmart incern. hethouszhOlds3CGSSaof the Municipalitizs will have to averteme :he concern. ; all why fix it'" Although the cast diffzren:iahe to is oat great, tha sum of t+reccaa be signir- diff,.ent market strucur_s , , tailection SYS- :he households in t!e city aver z pLriad ofi a !__r a 2 if Sc. paul 'rent to zn ar;an,z_d mil?tcn base- car ;cant. Lt izast S: �,ial in Carcouaxe pea. an annual S3'/'.ngs Qi.a 3 5i.:1� di:fere,• `oan 6a a661sirgle-family housing un..,, _nd span 6 .,mpnth' billing cost per household Per ,d with administration, :he contract, 3i111ng can be dore in cor- municiaalities .ai11 incur cof ass"'at ling Ci tax Statements and manitoriMg Pa.' , -c-1 ar ;pn as are msch ,+unction Aith other mun{cipal bt?Tines such as ? or utii'`y ' v the municipality rather Chan the waste hauler. i < jails. VatlOnLi stud{'eS ercunCyta yboutn9tve percent Or the less if hand, d b, casts b• -cadat,, Inc. Administration �edcon°r!c'. monitoring -a `he study 1 c total cost of t• ti region may be arfac:ed Haw organized collect;en is imclemented to dit r_ an Y by anti-trust law, this matter requ{res additional study. „A callecagn by rur{ci:Llities has the POtcrearl- se r �ni__� refuse collet:ion camoanles. An increase lmal?.'ilenLat{On of a g -',_ _r^ -e_d°A :C O,-fon tha SaMe tial :a ad•ierse?:/ 'r.smC_C;� S�tnz�a' 7ed be to COI' function. Consequently, fewer collection crews �pVihetherethis means a how organized collection lect refuse under an organized collection system.organized larly reduction in co itec:ian companies depends span Job on the side, may is implemented. art timenorSi scollecting wasS Of some te asuaejs, D those operating P be adversely affected. waste management system anany visionedby The implementation of the plan may work to offset ananized collec- Council's solid waste policy D as a result of Organ recyclables impacts upon the collection industcollection servicesensa for the reduction in the lion. The provis{on of collection services for yard waste, in th and household hazardous wastes may there is an opportunity for new nt labor force if organized collection were implemented by and waste compost sites or number of cities in the re ion Also, The expansion ar develaoment of new business ventures into management of he recycling iOn v{ties could 1ISO recyclables orac'esult ofSi cincreased _ incraise in us etha de, d for labor. M i FINOINCS ANO CONCLUSIONS 1. Organized collection may reduce the costs of residential refuse col- lection by increasing collection efficiencies. Additional study is needed to determine if organized collection may benefit commercial and industrial waste generators. 2. Organized collection reduces adverse environmental impacts when more than one hauler services a given area or provides the same type of collection service. 3. Organized collection does not inherently increase participation in recycling or other abatement programs. it can be implemented in ways that would help to achieve toe abatement objectives of the Solid 'Waste Management Guide/?olio plan. 4. Organized collection cannot substitute for waste designation by the county, but can c:mplament it. Municioalities and towns have adecuate authority to organize col- lection of residential refuse. o. Organized collection of residential refuse may be a net benefit to solid wasta management because it .may reduce costs and environ- mental impacts; help implement abatement programs; and imorove information about waste generation, composition and abatement. 1. There is no need for a regional system for implementation of organized collection. however, individual communities should consider the potential benefits of organized collection. M A. DO C.iING Pros 1. Continue bimonthly curbside pick up 2. Continued City Staff time 3. City Public relations - civic responsibility 4. Control location of drop off sites (landfill, RDF, etc.) D. ORGANIZED COLLECTION Pros 1. Uniform pick up of all waste 2. Less wear and tear on City streets 3. Lower safety risks 4. Possible combination of adjacent cities staff function into one person 5. All residents have pick up (mandatory collection) 6. Deal with limited number of haulers 7. All pick up done on same day 8. Control location of drop off sites (landfill, RDF, etc.) 9. Haulers provide containers (through City) C. LICENSE HAULERS Pros 1. Minimal City Staff time/City involvement 2. Encourage free market system 3. No additional utility billing 4. Encourage haulers to educate public 5. Possible commercial properties Involved 6. Possible high density multiple family involved 7. Haulers provide containers (through City) B. Haulers handle complaints 9. Control location of drop off sites (landfill, RDF, etc.) 10. No additional trucks 11. No negotiating contracts 12. License renewed each year 13. Can continue to subsidize program 14. Possible weekly pick up 15. All waste picked up on same day 16. Competition among haulers (hold prices down) 17. Weights still recorded n LJ Cons 1. Not keeping up with changing times 2. City handles complaints 3. Yard waste not addressed 4. Does not include commercial property 5. Does not include high density residential property 6. Multiple trucks on streets at different times 7. Not consistent Cons 1. Discourages free market system 2. Greater City involvement and time commitment 3. Change utility billing 4. Possible loss of dollars from County 5. Would not include commercial property 6. City handles complaints 7. Does not increase participation B. Does not include high density residential property Cons 1. No control on how waste is picked up 2. Perception that City is "pulling out,, 3. Multiple trucks on street at different times 4. No uniformity r_ RESOLUTION NO. 2549 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING BUDGET TRANSFERS FOR 1989 SALARY ADJUSTMENTS WHEREAS, Resolutions No. 2435 and 2439 established 1989 salaries for non -union personnel; and WHEREAS, Resolutions NO. 2378 and 2462 established 1989 salaries for union personnel.; and WHEREAS, the 1989 General Fund Budget provided for salary adjustments for non -union and union personnel; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mounds View that the following budget transfers for 1989 General Fund, Water Fund and Sewer Fund Budgets be hereby authorized: GENERAL FUND FROM 1989 Budget 100-4120-970 Salary Adjustments 65,685 100-4120 Administration O10 Salaries 030 Pensions 050 Workers Comp, 100-4130 Planning O10 Salaries 030 Pensions 050 Workers Comp 100-4150 Finance O10 Salaries 030 Pensions 050 Workers Comp. 100-4180 Public Works O10 Salaries 030 Pensions 050 Workers Comp. TO 61,467 7,228 246 42,201 4,963 1,813 78,241 9,201 313 55,404 6,516 2,035 Ammend- ments (39,829) 1,967 232 8 1,349 158 54 2, 775 326 11 3,543 0 145 1989 Ammended Budget 25,856 63,434 7,460 254 43,550 5,121 1,867 81,016 9,527 324 58,947 6,516 2,180 r� RESOLUTION NO. 2549 PAGE TWO OF THREE 1989 1989 Ammend- Ammended Budget ments Budget 100-4200 Police 010 Salaries 518,403 21,702 540,105 O11 Overtime 4,500 135 4,635 020 Part-time 10,046 406 10,452 030 Pensions 66,907 0 66,907 050 Workers Comp. 31,976 1,594 33,570 100-4230 Civil Defense 010 Salaries 12,433 496 12,929 030 Pensions 1,462 58 1,520 050 Workers Comp, 50 2 52 100-4240 Community Service 010 Salaries 5,642 226 5,668 030 Pensions 664 26 690 050 Workers Comp. 315 13 328 100-4270 Streets 010 Salaries 62,834 728 63,562 030 Pensions 7,688 123 7,811 050 Workers Comp. 6,467 72 6,539 100-4350 Recreation 010 Salaries 78,559 3,210 81,769 030 Pensions 9,641 377 10,018 050 Workers Comp. 4,322 93 4,415 TOTAL GENERAL FUND 1,091,537 39,829 1,131,366 WATER FUND FROM 100-4121-910 Contingency 14,179 ( 1,771) 12,408 TO 700-4120 Water Administration 010 Salaries 40,393 1,523 41,916 030 Pensions 4,706 173 4,879 050 Workers Comp. 1,507.. 75 1,582 TOTAL WATER FUND 46,606 1,771 48,377 w I RESOLUTION NO. 2549 PAGE THREE OF THREE 1989 1989 Ammend- Ammended Budget ments Budget SEWER FUND FROM 730-4121-910 Contingency 14,179 (1,771) 12,408 TO 730-4120 Sewer Administration 40,393 1,523 41,916 010 Salaries 4,706 173 4,879 030 Pension 050 Workers Comp. 1,507 75 1,582 TOTAL SEWER FUND 46,606 1,771 48,377 TOTAL ALL FUNDS 1,184,749 43,371 1,228,120 Adopted this 23rd day of October, 1989 ATTEST: Susan M. Hankner, Mayor (SEAL) Donald F. Pauley, Clerk -Administrator