HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packets - 1989/12/11A
VI.
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
DECEMBER 11, 1989
EXECUTIVE SESSION - 6:00 P.H.
DISCUSSION OF LABOR CONTRACT NEGOTIATIONS WITH TEAMSTERS
-LOCAL NO. 320
7:00 P.M.
A G E N D A
CALL To ORDER
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL - Wuori,
—Quick, Blanchard,
Paone, Hankner
APPROVAL OF MINUTES: November 27, 1989
Regular Meeting
SPECIAL ORDER OF BUSINESS:
I. Third Quarter Department Head Reports
- Finance Director Brager
2. Presentation of Distinguished Budget Presentation
Award by the Government Finance Officers'
Association of the United States and Canada
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. 7:10 p.M. - Consider Organized Solid Waste
Collection
a. Consideration of Resolution
No. 2570 Regarding Organized
Solid Waste Collection in the
City of Mounds View
Council Action:
2, 7:15 P.M. - Consider A Waiver Of Highway 10
Moritorium District Requirements
to Erect a New Sign at Firstar
Bank, 2711 Highway 10
a. Consideration of Resolution No.
2577 Approving a Waiver of Highway
AGENDA
DECEMBER 11, 1989
PAGE TWO
10 Moritorium District Require-
ments to Erect a New Sign at
Firstar Bank, 2711 Highway 10
Council Action:
VII. RESIDENTS REQUESTS AND COMMENTS FROM THE FLOOR
--------------------------------------------------
CITIZENS: BEFORE SPEAKING PLEASE GIVE YOUR FULL NAME
AND ADDRESS FOR THE MINUTES
------------------------------------------------------
VIII. CONSENT AGENDA
1. Reschedule Public Hearing on Ordinance No. 481
Amending Chapter 48 of the Municipal Code
Entitled, "Wetland Zoning Ordinance" for 7:05
P.M. on January 22, 1990 to February 26, 1990
2. Set Public Hearing to Consider a Waiver of
Highway 10 Moritorium District Requirements
to Erect a New Sign for TJB Builders, 2704
Highway 10
3. Approve Second Partial Pay Request for Mounds
View Business Park South Public Improvements from
Glenn Rehbein Excavating, Inc. in the Amount of
$113,930.75 to be Charged to Account
#693-4121-705
4. Schedule 1990 Annual Meeting for 7:00 p.m. on
January 2, 1990
5. Adopt Resolution No. 2572 Approving Just and
Correct Claims Against City Funds
6. Licenses for Approval
Amusement Devices - Expires 12/31/89
American Amusement Arcades - Renewal (Loose Ends,
Roberts Off 10, Mermaid, Inc.)
Non -Intoxicating Malt Liquor - Expires 12/31/89
mb Tom Thug
hu- County Road I - Renewal
General - Expires 6/30,90
Freric5s Construction Co. - New
Preferred Builders - Renewal
Stenco Construction - Renewal
•
AGENDA
DECEMBER 11, 1989
PAGE THREE
Heating and Air Conditioning - Expires 6Ly90
EAC, Inc. - New
Cecil E. Seals - New
Sewer and Water - Expires 6LI0190
Kuehn Excavating - New
Marty Bros. - Renewal
Sign - Expires 6 30 89
Signcr Inc. - New
S rinklers - (Fire Protection) Expires 0
General Sprinkler Corporation - New
IX. COUNCIL BUSINESS
1. Appoint JoAnn Colleen, 2617 County Road I to the
Planning Commission for a Term Expiring
December 31, 1989
Council Action:
2. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding
Petition for Street Light Installation on Spring
Lake Road
Council Action:
3. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding
Audrey Almendinger's Probationary Period
Performance Review
Council Action:
4. Authorize Mayor and Clerk -Administrator to
ofEnter
Into Contract With Ramsey Recycling,
or
Recycling Services through March 31, 1990
Council Action:
5. Authorize Mayor and Clerk -Administrator to Enter
into Animal Pound Contract With Brighton
Veterinary Clinic Beginning January 1, 1990
Council Action:
6. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding 1990
Budget Additions
Council Action:
AGENDA
DECEMBER 11, 1989
PAGE FOUR
7. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding
County Road I - Supplemental Agreement Contractor
Delay Due to Right -Of -Way Negotiations
Council Action:
S. Consideration of Agency Agreement with Minnesota
Department of Transportation
Council Action:
9. Consideration of Resolution Establishing Policy
on the Placement of Planning Signs
Council Action:
10. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding 7801
Sunnyside Road (Gordon Bayerkohler)
a. Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance No.
480 Amending the Municipal Code of Mounds
View By Amending Chaper 47 Entitled, "House
and Building Numbers"
Council Action:
11. Consideration of Resolution No. 2574 Establishing
City of Mounds View Policy Regarding Petitions
for Public Improvements
Council Action:
12. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding
Certificate of Occupancy for Dynamic Designers,
7660 Woodlawn Drive
Council Action:
X. REPORTS:
1. Report of Attorney
2. Report of Staff Members
r`.
AGENDA
DECEMBER 11, 1969
PAGE FIVE
Report of, Councilmembers: Wuori, Quick,
Blanchard, Paone,
Hankner
Report of Administrator
XI. ADJOURNMENT:
N
RESOLUTION NO. 2570
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION REGARDING ORGANIZED SOLID WASTE
COLLECTION IN THE CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
WHEREAS, the Ramsey County Board in its Solid Waste Master
Plan and Recycling Implementation Strategy has adopted policies
requiring municipalities to explore organized collection as a
means to fund recycling and composting programs after 1990; and
WHEREAS, the City of Mounds View held a public hearing on
December 11, 1989, as required by Minnesota Statutes 115A.94, on
the issue of whether the City should consider implementation of,
organized collection as the basis of an integrated solid waste
management system; and
WHEREAS, organized collection, as defined in Minnesota
Statutes 1988, 115A.94, Subd. 1, means a system for collecting
solid waste in which a specified collector, or member of an
organization of collectors, is authorized to collect from a
defined geographic service area or areas some or all of the solid
waste that is released by generators for collection; and
WHEREAS, the primary purposes of organized collection are
to (1) prevent overlap or duplication of collection service
areas, (2) facilitate solid waste management tools such as
mandatory refuse collection, volume -based pricing and the
impending yard waste disposal ban, (3) reduce the number of
trucks operating in a given street or alley to make the system
more efficient, (4) improve recycling convenience for the
homeowner, thereby increasing participation, and (5) reduce
litter and illegal dumping.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council
hereby intends to organize collection in accordance with
Minnesota Statutes, 115A.94, and intends to study the
implementation of an integrated solid waste management system
weighing benefits and detriments of all possible systems. Based
upon the findings that residents of the City will benefit from
such a system, the City will then implement an organized system.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that for the purpose of carrying
out the above intent, the Department of Public Works is
authorized to implement the following sequence of events:
1. Begin the required minimum 90-day study by identifying
system options to be considered, including, but not
limited to:
RESOLUTION NO. 2570
PAGE TWO
a. Maintaining the status quo;
b. Implement mandatory collection of mixed waste;
c. Modifications of the present open system;
d. Implement license requirements for volume -based
fees,separate yard waste pickup, and mandatory
recycling;
e. Zonirg system for same day collection;
f. Organized collection by consortium;
g. Bid contract by one hauler;
h. Bid contract by district; and
1. Municipal collection.
2. Establishment of standards and criteria of service for
an integrated solid waste management system; in a '
n.aaner consistent with Minnesota Statutes, Chapter
115A, and the Solid Waste Master Plan and Recycling
Implementation Strategy adopted by Ramsey County.
3. Solicit plans or proposals from refuse haulers and
other interested parties concerning refuse collection
system configuration, and invite the assistance of
interested persons, including persons operating solid
waste collection systems, in the development of plans
or proposals for the organized collection system,
including the establishment of any such system.
4. Conduct any public meetings necessary to discuss
options, standards, criteria, and proposals with
interested citizens and encourage their response and
comments, and to invite refuse haulers or their
representatives to such meetings if deemed
appropriate.
5. Evaluate all proposals taking into account all public
comment and response, and submit to the Council for
its consideration any recommendations for an organized
solid waste management system.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that upon the completion of the
above process and receipt of the recommendations, the Council
will consider the adoption of the necessary ordinances or
resolutions to implement the establishment of the organized solid
waste collection system.
Adopted this llth day of December, 1989.
ATTEST:
(SEAL) Mayor
Clerk -Administrator
..
n SPATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) ss.
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW )
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTICE
OF PUBLIC HEARING
I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified City Clerk of the
City of Mounds View, hereby certify that on Thurs., Nov. 30,1989,
acting on behalf of said City, deposited in the United States
Post Office in New Brighton, Minnesota copies of the attached
notice of public hearings on petition for the request by Firstar
Bank for a waiver of the Highway 1.0 Moritorium District require-
ments to replace their sign at 2711 Highway 10
enclosed in a sealed envelope with postage thereon fully prepaid,
addressed to the following persons with the addresses appearing
opposite their respective names:
(see attached list)
There is delivery service by the U.S. Mail between the place of
mailing and the places so addressed.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF I have hereunto subscribed my name and affixed
the City seal this -.20 day of 191"_.
C&Ity C c,
Subscribed and sworn to before me this
io day of nle 1 19 7y _
.T BAR3ARA A. COLLINS
NOTAa' :n BU-IiIN:vESOTA
Rdn:oc7 COUNTY
Notary Public
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE iS HEREBY GIVEN that the Mounds View City Council
will meet on Monday, December11, 1989, at 7:15 p.m.w, Minn
Mounds to
View City Hall, 2401 Highway 1
consider a request by Firstar Bank for a waiver of the Highway 10
Moritorium District requirements to replace�the principal
sign located
on
the Highway 10 frontage with a new sign. property
rP Y
at 2711 Highway 10 and legally known as: '
SPRING LAKE PARK HILLVIEW
EX SWLY 100 FT FOR HWY;
LOTS 108, 109, 110 AND 111
Anyone desiring to be heard with reference to this matter,
may be heard at this meeting.
this
contaIf yu have any ct Michelle Hren,luCity Planner, estions dat9meeting, please
784-3055
Donald F. Pauley
Clerk -Administrator �-
(Focus: December 6, 1989)
`-
Public Hearing
Firstar Bank
2711 Highway 10
December 11, 1989
Amoco Corp.
2211 York Road
P.O. Box 3428
Oak Brook, IL 60522
James L. Anderson
Kathleen Truskowski
7930 Sunnyside Road
Mounds View, MN 55112
Julianne E. Love
7900 Sunnyside Road
Mounds View, MN 55112
Church upon the Rock
7901 Red Oak Drive
Mounds View, MN 55112
Clifton 0. More et al
7950 Red Oak Drive
Mounds View, MN 55112
Bruce F. Toth
Vernon F. Toth
2741 Hillview Road
Mounds View, MN 55112
Harry A. Johnson et al
7900 Red Oak Drive
Mounds View, MN 55112
David & Patricia Coffey
2757 Hillview Road
Mounds View, MN 55112
. L. & Norma J. Peterson
49 Hillview Road
ands View, MN 55112
Wm. M. & Vivian Gillespie Wm, A. Winters et al
2833 Highway 10 c 7831 Sunnyside Road '
Mounds View, MN 55112 Mounds View, MN 55112
George J. Winnicki Allen & Vonda Heckman
2732 Highway 10 Marlin & Darlene Melquist
Mounds Visw, MN 55112 10130 Sycamore
Coon. Rapids, MN 55433
State of Minnesota
Trust Exempt
109 Court House
St. Paul, MN 55102
David Demeules
4990 County Road 18 N.
Minneapolis, MN 55428
Clara Indykiewicz
1451 County Road I W
Shoreview, MN 55126
Bank of Wayzata, c/o Dale
Jones Retirement Plan
P.G. Box 340
Walker, MN 56484
Gertrude A. Hauble
14907 Potomac Street
Forest Lake, MN 55025
Helen A. Bringewatt
7981 Red Oak Drive
Mounds View, MN 55112
TJB Companies, Inc.
2560 - 134th Lane N.E.
Anoka, MN 55304
King S. McCord
5617 Code Avenue
Edina, MN 55436
Sabaskong Bay Associates
7801 Sunnyside Road
Mounds View, MN 55112
Dennis & Gayle ,Hagen
7851 Sunnyside Road
Mounds View, MN 55112
Ruth E. Cox
7863 Sunnyside Road
Mounds View, MN 55112
Conrad J. & Doris Wilson
7877 Sunnyside Road
Mounds View, MN 55112
Shirley M. Johnson
7891 Sunnyside Road
Mounds View, MN 55112
Donald Forslund et al
7886 Sunnyside Road
Mounds View, MN 55112
Kermit L. Hackett et al
7876 Sunnyside Road
Mounds View, MN 55112
Ernest A. Perron
Meldine M. Perron
7870 Sunnyside Road
Mounds Views MN 55112
Vernon C. Olson et al A. A. Properties
7933 Fairchild Avenue Mark G. Kraus
2601 Lake of the Isles Pkwy. 7840 Sunnyside Road
Mounds View, MN 55112 Minneapolis, MN 55408 Mounds View, MN 55112
Public Hearing
Firstar - Dec. 11, 1989
Page 2
Roy Anderman et al
7828 Sunnyside Road
Mounds View, MN 55112
Crown Auto Co.
7550 Corporate Way
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
Firstar Bank
2299 Palmer Drive
New Brighton, MN 55112
Lawrence R. Lind et al
2716 Hillview Road
Mounds View, MN 55112
Ki^der-Care Learning Ctr.
4 ; Executive Park Dr.
Montgomery, AL 36116
Strategis
P.O. Box 59365
Schaumburg, IL 60159
City of Mounds View
2401 Highway 10
Mounds View, MN 55112
Attn: Barb
Mark S. Corothers
7841 Sunnyside Road
Mounds View, MN 55112
Willard F. Downing et al
7885 Sunnyside Road
Mr— nds View, MN 55112
RESOLUTION No. 2577
jt
-Q
7-15 P.M.
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION (AppROVING/DENYING) THE REQUEST
BY FIRSTAR BANK FOR A WAIVER OF THE HIGHWAY 10
MORITORIUM DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS, PLANNING CASE N0. 285-89
ed the
WHEREAS, the Mounds View c.eylacement ofCouncil seheireWexisting
request by Firstai Bank to allow P
sign with a new sign on their property Located at 2711 Highway,
legally known as:
E}CRING LAKE S'ALY 100 FTRFORIHWY;
and
LOTS 108, 109, 110 AN
111;
Council has reviewed Ord
WHEREAS, the City requirements; and 466
addressing Highway 10 moritorium district
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the appeal
provision which is Section 6 of Ordinance No. 466; and
Commission has reviewed the
WHEREAS, the Planning nest;
request and recommends to the City Council denial of the re
and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has determined that the
request does not meet the criteria outlined in the appeal
provisions; and Commission states the following
WHEREAS, the Planning
reasons for their denial!
1. Lack
ovaldwouldtimpatliruthe eintegrity of the moritorium
2. APP
district.
ity Council Of
requested waiver of
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the C
the city of Mounds View (apProves/denys) the requirements
foi Firstar Bank
the Highway 10 moritorium district
contingent upon:
1. The existing sign is removed at the same time the
new sign is erected.
Adopted this Llth day of December, 1989.
ATTEST:
Mayor
(SEAL)
Clerk -Administrator
.ko
1f»1 Z� 1,2
PIN MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: City Planner Hren
DATE: December 6, 1989
SUBJECT: 7801 SUNNYSIDE ROAD - BAYERROHLER OFFICE BUILDING
Please find attached a memo from Forester Wriskey indicating that
the landscaping as recommended has been completed.
To date, the original sign has not been removed, however, the new
sign is erected.
Per my telephone conversation with Mr. Gordy Bayerkohler this
morning, he indicated that he was aware of the situation and the
fact that there is now a violation of the Sign Code. Mr.
Bayerkohler stated that he expected the sign to be removed by
Saturday which would be in time for the second reading of the
ordinance which would change the address of the building from
Sunnyside Road to Highway 10.
Staff will know on Monday whether the applicant has complied with
City requirements.
MMH/BAC
Attachment
MEMO TO: MICHELLE HREN, CITY PLANNER
FROM: RICK WRISKEY, CITY FORESTER
DATE: NOVEMBER 28, 1989
SUBJECT: I NDSCAPING - 7808 SUNNYSIDE RD.
The landscaping for the site of 7808 Sunnyside Rd. was installed as
recommended. The planted size of the three shade trees, however, was
smaller than advised. I don't see this as a problem in that the spacing
between the trees was much tighter than usual.
I would recommend, in this case, a recheck of the landscaping after one
growing year.
RFW/SLL
C
ORDINANCE NO. 480
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF
MOUNDS VIEW BY AMENDING CHAPTER 47, ENTITLED,
"HOUSE AND BUILDING NUMBERS"
The Council of the City of Mounds View does hereby
ordain:
SECTION I. Chapter 47.05, "Specific House and Building
Number Changes" is hereby amended by adding the following:
6. Changes of
PREVIOUS NUMBER
7801 Sunnyside Road
NUMBER CHANGE TO
2677 Highway 10
(Legal; Spring Lake Park Hillview, sub c;;t to highway
and except northeasterly 150 feet, Lot 84
PIN 06-30-23-43-0016)
SECTION 11. This ordinance shall take effect 30 days
after the date of its publication.
Read by the Council of the City of Mounds View on this
23rd day of October, 1989.
Passed by the Council of the City of Mounds View this
day of 1989.
ATTEST:
Mayor
(SEAL)
Clerk -Administrator
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney
REQUEST FOR PAYMENT I
DATE: 11/8/89
PAYMENT NO.:
2
PROJECT: Mounds View Bus
LOCATION:
Pk S CONTRACTOR:
Glenn Rehbein Exc
Mounds View, MN
PROJECT NO.: 88-109
ADDRESS:
7309 Lake Drive
FOR PERIOD: 10/1 - 10/31/89
FILE:
Lino Lakes, MN
REHBNP.IY
SUMMARY:
1. Original Contract Amount
$545,903.93
2. Change Order - ADDITION
$0.00
3. Change Order - DEDUCTION
($17,457.43)
- NET
4. Revised Contract Amount
($17,457.43)
$528,446.50
5. Value Completed To Date
$182,415.91
6. Material on Hand
$0.00
7. Amount Earned
$182,4$0.00
82,415.91
8. Less Retainage 5$
9. Subtotal
$1$9,120.80
173,295.11
10. Less Amount Previously Paid
il. AMOUNT DUE THIS REQUEST FOR PAYMENT
$$59,364.36
It is hereby certified that all work has been completed in confor-
mance with the plans and specifications for Project No. 88-109.
Recommended for Approval By: Payment Requested By:
MERILA AND ASSOyC�IATES, INC. GLENN�RjEHBE,Iti EXCAVATING, INC.
By:-," � F1L� By: �' If a Zti
Reg. No.: /96ZI- Date: // - 2
Date:/V21/0s
Approved By Owner:
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
By:
Date: 9-2 8-89
0
U
Memo To :Mayor and City Council Members
From :Ric Minetor, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
Date :November 29, 1989
Subject :Pay Request 1 2 - Mounds View Business Park - South
We have received the second partial pay request from Glenn
Rehbein Excavating, Inc. in the amount of $113,930.75. The
engineer (Merilla & Associates) has reviewed the request and
recommended payment. Staff recommends approval and payment of
this request, to be charged to account / 693-4121-705.
C
59
C•
RESOLUTION NO, 2572
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY. OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MLNNFSCTA
APPROVING JUST AND CORRECT
CLAIM AGAINST CITY FUNDjS
WMME.4S, the City Council of Mounds View, pursuant to
Minnesota Statutes 412.241, has full authority over the financial affairs
of the City and;
WHEREAS, The City Council has reviewed the claims numbers:
29024 through 29087 in the amount of $ 33,883.82
21578 through 21599 in the amount of $ 126,450.38
through in the amount of $
through iz the amount of $
TOTAL AMOUNT OF CLAIM PRESENTED $ 160,334.20
and has found said •claims to be Just and correct;
(list of any exception)
NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved that the City Council of Mounds View
hereby approved the attached lists of claims dated 12112189 by the
vote ayes nayes
ATTEST:
(SEAL)
Mayor
Clerk -Administrator
PAGE 1
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER
AP-CIO-01
MOUNDS VIEW
VENDOR
CHECK
CHECK
INVOICE
INVOICE DISCOUNT
CHE
NO VENDOR
NAME NUMBER
DATE
INVOICE NMBR DATE
AMOUNT AMOUNT
AMOU
811^OLEM'S
TREE SERVICE 29024
12/12/89
1433 11/19/89
250.00
250.-
ACCOUNT
NUMBER- 275-4450-352000
ANT-
250.00 DESC-SOLEM'S
TREE SERVICE
VENDOR TOTAL
250.00
250.
81238 CRYSTEEL TRUCK EQ. 29025 12/12/89 3168 11/30/89 150.00
ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4200-703000 AMT- 150.00 DESC-CRYSTEEL '.RUCK/RUNNING BOARDS
VENDOR TOTAL 160.00
83201 LOTUS DIRECT 29026 12/12/89 11/17/89 40.00
ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4120-210000 AMT- 40.00 DESC-LOTUS/SUBSCRIPTION
VENDOR TOTAL 40.00
86129 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE, 29027 12/12/89 32S123 11/13/B9 9.75
ACCOUNT `1UMBER- 100-4270-513000 AMT- 9.75 DESC-POMP'S TIRE SERVICE/PARTS -
VENDOR TOTAL 9.75
92500 AC-DELCO 29026 12/12/89 12/04/89 12.50
ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-122000 AMT- 12.50 DESC-AC-DELCO/PARES 8 SERV MANUAL
VENDOR TOTAL 12.50
92501 LYN CARIVEAU 29029 12/12/89 12/04/89 14.25
ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-3500-352114 AMT- 14.25 DESC-LYN CARIVEAU/REFUND
VENDOR TOTAL 14.25
92502 WINFIELD A MITCHELL 29030 12/12/89 10/16/89 450.00
".COUNT NUMBER- 650-4120-303000 AMT- 450.00 OESC-WINFIELD MITCHELL/APPRAISAL
VENDOR TOTAL 450.00
92503 MARIE O'KEEFE 29031 12/12/89 12/04/89 48.00
ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-3500-354246 AMT- 48.00 DESC-MARIE O'KEEFE/REFUND
VE14POR TOTAL 49.00
92304 DARLENE STANDAL 29032 12/12/89
ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-3500-351014 AMT-
72505 MN DEPT OF NATURAL RE* 29033 12/12/89
ACCOUNT NUMBER- 255-4121-140000 AMT--
12/04/89 4.00
4.00 OESC-OARLENE STANDAL/REFUND
VEI4DOR TOTAL 4.00
12/04/89 3.00
3.00 DESC-MN DNP./WATERCRAFT RENEWAL LIC
VENDOR fOfAL 3.00
92506 ATHLETIC DIRECTORY 29034 12/12/89 92506 12/04/89 10.00
ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4351-160030 AMT- 10.00 DESC-ATHLETIC DIRECTORY/PUBLICATION
VENDOR TOTAL 10.00
92507 ARNIE RUDI 29035 12/12/89
ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-2306-000000 AMT-
92508 TRANSPORT FOR CHRIST 29036 12/12/89
ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-2306-000000 AMT-
12/04/89 65.00
65.00 DESC-ARNIE RUUI/REFUND
VENDOR fUfAL 65.00
12/04/89 65.00
65.00 DESC-fRANSPORF FOR CHRIST/REFUND
150.
150.
40.
40.
9.
9.
12.
12.
14.
14.
450.
450.
48.
48.
4.
4.
3.
3.
10.
10.
65.
65.
65.
PAGE 2
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER
AP-CIO-01
MOUNDS VIEW
VENDOR
CHECK
CHECK
INVOICE INVOICE DISCOUNT
CHEt
NO VENDOR NAME
NUMBER
DATE
INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT
AMft
VENDOR TOTAL 65.00
65.t
92509 DONALD HANSEN
29037
12/12/89
12/05/89 40.00
40.1
ACCOUNT NUMBER-
700-4121-901000
AMT-
40.00 DESC-DONALD HANSEN/REFUND
VENDOR TOTAL 40.00
40.'
WESTWOOD PROFESSIONAL* 29038 12/12/89 10/30/89 1353.03
ACCOUNT NUMBER- 480-4120-303000 ANT- 1353.03 DESC-WESTWOOD PROF/SYSCO PUB IMPRO
VENDOR TOTAL 1353.03
PONY EXPRESS RELOADER* 29039 12/12/89 12i34/89 38.30
ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4200-363000 AMT- 38.30 DESC-PONY EXPRESS RELOADERS/AMMO
VENDOR TOTAL 38.30
A4985 AMERICAN LINEN SUPPLY* 29040 12/12/89 M18381204 12/04/89 13.38
ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-355000 AMT- 13.39 DESC-AM LINEN SUPPLY/TOWELS
VENDOR TOTAL 13.38
AMERICAN OFFICE PRODU* 29041 12/12/89 217962 11/24/89 31.70
ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-114000 AMT- 31.70 DESC-AM OFFICE. PRODUCTS/RUBBER STPS
VENDOR TOTAL 31.70
1 BACON ELECTRIC 29042 11/12/89 16848 11/20/89 2584.87
ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-170000 AMT- 2584.87 DESC-BACON'S ELECTRIC/LP TANK -GATE
29042 12/12/89 16819 10/31/89 284.60
/ COUNT NUMBER- 730-4121-513000 AMT- 284.60 DESC-BACON'S ELEC/RAYMON➢ 3 BRONSON
VENDOR TOTAL 2869.47
B0550 BARR ENGINEERING CO. 29043 12/12/89 10/19/89 3239.25
ACCOUNT NUMBER- 420-4121-303000 AMT- 3239.25 DESC-BARR ENGINEERING/WETLAND ORD
29043 12/12/89 11/27/89 1233.70
ACCOUNT NUMBER- 420-4121-303000 AMT- 1233.70 DESC-BARR ENGINEERING/WETLAND ORD
VENDOR TOTAL 44/2.95
B0650 BASTIEN PRODUCTS INC 29044 12/12/89 298311 11/21/89 74.04
ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-303000 AMT- 74.04 DESC-BA9TIEN PRODUCTS/SUPPLIES
VENDOR TOTAL 74.04
CARLSON EQUIPMENT COM* 29045 12/12/89 153037 11/20/89 1100.00
ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-124000 AMT- 550.00 DESC-CARLSON EQUIP/VIBRATORY PLATE
ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4121-124000 AMT- 550.00 DESC-CARLSON EGUIP/VIBRATORY PLATE
VENDOR TOTAL 1100.00
COAST TO COAST 29046 12/12/89 003121
ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-160000 AMT- 2.39
29046 12/12/89 003065
ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-121000 AMT- 3.49
29046 12/12/89 003049
ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-160000 AMT- 6.36
29046 12/12/89 003073
11/22/89 2.39
DESC-COAST TO COAST/WIRE
11/16/89 3.49
DESC-COAST TO COAST/CAULK
11/13/89 6.36
DESC-COAST TO C0AS1%,CREEN
11/17/89 7.58
1353.
1353.E
38.:
38.
13.:
13.'
31.
31.
2584.
294.
2869.
3239.
1233.1
4472.
74.
74.
1100.
1100.
2.
3.
6.
7.-
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER
PAGE 3
AP-CIO-01
MOUNDS VIEW
INVUICE INVOICE DISCOUNT
CHEC
VENDOR
CHECK
NUMBER
CHECK
DATE
INVOICE NMBR DATE AMUUNT
AMOUt
NO VENDOR NAME
COUNT NUMBER-
100-4190-121000
AMT-
7.59 DESC-COAST TO COAST/BULBS
5.96
5 5
29046
12/12/39
003109 11/21/89
TO COAS25URIILL BITS
5.96VENOOR
ACCOUNT NUMBER-
100-4270-160000
AMT-
TOTAL .79
25.E
C5822 COMMUNICATIONS
CENTER 29047
12/12/B9
136470 il/29/89 26.00
26.00 DESC-COMM CENTER/REPAIR RADIO
26.(
ACCOUNT NUMBER-
100-4200-513000
AMT-
81263 11/20/89 383.00
383.0
29047
700-4121-401000
12/12/89
AMT-
CENTER/409EOOVE WATTMETER
383.00VENDOR
409.(
ACCOUNT NUMBER-
TOTAL
29048
12/12/39
11/11/89 1345.76
1345.7
C6000 COPY SALES
ACCOUNT NUMBER-
100-4190-401000
AMT-
1345.76
1345.76VENDOR
1345.i
TOTALSALES/1345.76NTAL
D1950 DESIGN ELECTRIC, INC. 29049
12/12/89
10/11/89 6614.75
ELtC6614105g WOODALE DR
6614.75VENUOR
6614.7
ACCOUNT NUMBER-
650-4120-705000
AMT-
IUTALN
6614.7
F1925 fEDOR5 MARKET
29050
12/12/89
4329 I1/21/89 58.85
58.35VEDEDSO4-fEODAL'S MARKES/8H34S
58.1
ACCOUNT NUMBER-
100-4190-121000
AM1-
F3636 NEW BRTGHT0-
12/12/89
12/04/89 100.00
100.00AR NEW BOX
100.(
ACCDUHT NUMBER-
ACCOUNT
14000
500-4190-114000
AMT-
VENDOR TOTAL100.00000H/DEN
100.(
F5900 4 X 4 SERVICE
29052
12/12/B9
97307 11/084 S /ALSO
17.50 DESC-4 x 4 SERVICE/f.LIGNMENT
ACCOUNT NUMBER-
100-4260-512000
AMT-
12/12/09
91337 11/15/89 17.50
17.4
ACCOUNT NUMBER-
29052
100-4260-512000
AMT-
17.50 DESC-4x 4 SERVIC35AOOGNMENT
TOT'
35.(
VENDOR
G0040 G E CAPITAL CORPORATI* 29053
12/12/89
04005561 11/19/89 300.97
APIFAL/300N97LEASE
300.4
ACCOUNT NUMBER-
100-4190-310000
AMT-
300.97VENDOR TOTAL
300.9
29054
12/12/89
12/04/89 19.94
19.5
60550 TROY GAMBLE.
100-4190-380000
AMT-
DESC-TRYACCOUNT
19.94VENDOR
19.f
NUMBER-
TOTALGAMBLE/M19.94E
r
65940 GOVERNMENT TRAINING Sn 2905�
0
1�/1�/89
6661 11/27/89 100.00
100.00 Dt5Ci6�27P8TC COU100.00MPA
100.(
ACCOUNT NUMBER-
100-4200-363000
AMT-
6671
100.(
29055
12/12/89
AMT-
LSUN
COURSE -NELSON
IOO.UOVENDOR
ACCOUNT NUMBER-
100-4200-363000
107ALfAC
00.00
200.(
06755 W W GRAINGER INC 29056
12/1'2/89
495-211694-7 11/13/89 49.30
49.30 DESC-GRAINGER/LAWN SPREADER
49.E
ACCOUNT NUMBER-
100-4190-121000
29056
AMT-
12/12/89
49/-855845-2 11/16/89 112.98
112.
I
PAGE 4
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER
AP-CIO-01
MOUNDS VIEW
VENDOR
CHECK
CHECK
INVOICE
INVOICE DISCOUNT
CHEL
NO VENDOR NAME
NUMBER
DATE
INVOICE NMBR DATE
AMOUNT AMOUNT
AMOUb
COUNT NUMBER-
100-4190-121000
AMT-
112.98 ➢ESC-GRAINGER/LAMPS
29056
12/12/99
497-854125-9 11/07/89
69.52
89.`
ACCOUNT NUMBER-
700-4121-125000
AMT-
89.52 DESC-GRAINGER/SUPPLIES
VENDOR TOTAL
251.80
251.1
H0586 HARMON GLASS
29057
12/12/69
1216951 11/06/89
321.62
321.e
ACCOUNT NUMBER-
700-4121-121000
AMT-
321.62 DESC-HARMOH GLASS/WTNOSHIELD
VENDOR TOTAL
321.62
321.E
H0715 HAYDEN-MURPHY
29058
12/12/87
31026 11/13/89
36.61
36.e
ACCOUNT NUMBER-
730-4121-123000
AMT-
36.61 DESC-HAYDEN-MURPHY EUUIP/PARTS
29058
12/12/39
3107Z 11/14/89
13.74
13.;
ACCOUNT NUMBER-
730-4121-123000
AMT-
13.74 DESC-HAYDEN-MURPHY EQUIP/HEADLIGHT
VENDOR TOTAL
50.35
50.:
H5800 HOLMES 8 GRAVEN 29059
12/12/89
025802 11/14/89
260.63
260.E
ACCOUNT NUMBER-
691-4120-303000
AMT-
260.6? DESC-HOLMES 8
GRAVEN/PROF SERVICES
29059
12/12/89
025800 11/14/89
999.60
999.e
ACCOUNT NUMBER-
650-4120-303000
AMT-
999.60 DESC-HOLMES L
GRAVEN/PROF SERVICE
29059
12/12/89
25801 11/14/89
233.15
233.:
ACCOUNT NUMBER-
100-2303-000934
AMT-
233.15 DESC-HOLMES 8
GRAVEN/PROF SERVICE
VENDOR TOTAL
1493.38
1493.::
H6100 MICHELLE HREN
29060
12/12/89
12/05/89
9.60
9.,
ACCOUNT NUMBER-
100-4190-380000
AMT-
9.60 DESC-MICHELLE
HREN/MILEAGE
VENDOR TOTAL
9.60
9.,
I00484 ICMA - MIS
29061 12/12/89
12/05/89
63.95
63.f
ACCOUNT NUMBER-
100-4120-210000
AMT-
63.95 DESC-ICMA/PUBLICAFTON
VENDOR TOTAL
63.95
63.'
I5400 IHGMAN LABORATORIES, 29062 12/12/89
12/OS/89
40.80
40.T
ACCOUNT NUMBER-
700-4121-303000
AMT-
40.80 DESC-IHGMAN LAB/ANALYSES
VENDOR TOTAL
40.80
40.:
L2000 LENFER TRANSMISSIONS 29063 12/12/89
5226 11/09/89
484.00
484.L
ACCOUNT NUMBER-
100-4260-513000
AMT-
484.00 DESC-LENFER TRANSMISSIONS/REBUILT
VENDOR TOTAL
484.00
484.i
L3545 LILLIE SURURBAN
NEWS 29064 12/12/89
12/05/89
24.00
24.T
ACCOUNT NUMBER-
250-4354-160260
AMT-
24.00 DESC-LILLIE NEWSPAPER/ADS
VENDOR TOTAL
24.00
24.(
M0750 MASYS CORPORATION 29065 12/12/89 3524 12/01/89
646.00
646..
ACCOUNT NUMBER-
100-4190-513000
AMT-
646.00 DESC-MASYS CORP/MAINTENANCE-SOFTWR
VENDOR TOTAL
646.00
646.t
13442 MIDWEST ASPHALT
CORPO* 29066 12/12/89 021254
11111189
1635.16
163S.1
ACCOUNT NUMBER-
700-4121-124000
AMT- 1635.16 DESC-MIDWEST ASPHALI/ROAD MATERIAL
29066 12/12/09 002174 11/04/89
38.41
8S."
PAGE 5
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER
AP-C10-01
MOUNDS VIEW
VENDOR
CHECK
CHECK
INVOICE INVOICE DISCOUNT
CHEI
NO VEN➢OR NAME
NUMBER
DATE
INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT
AMOU1
!'1
.COUNT NUMBER-
100-4270-124000
AMT-
88.41 DESC-MIDWEST ASPHALT/ROAD MATERIALS
VENDOR TOTAL 1723.57
1723.`.
MS500 MITCHELL INFO
SERVICE* 29067
12/12/89 B072600 11/07/89 67.00
67.(
ACCOUNT NUMBER-
100-4260-122000
AMT-
67.00 DESC-MIfCHELL/PUBLICATIONS
VENDOR IOTAL 67.00
67.(
M8105 MUNICIPAL ECON
DEV NE* 29068
12/12/89 12/05/89 100.00
100.(l
ACCOUNT NUMBER-
650-4120-303000
AMT-
1.00.00 DESC-MUN ECON DEV NTWRK/CONSULTING
VENDOR fOfAL 100.00
100.(
H4200 NORTHERN STATES FGWEP.* 29069
12/12/89
12/05/89 92.32
92.'.
ACCOUNT NUMBER-
255-4121-321000
AMT-
8.22 ➢ESC-NSP/UTILITY BILLING
ACCOUNT NUMBER-
255-4121-321000
AM1-
57.58 DESC-NSP/UTILITY BILLING
ACCOUNT NUMBER-
700-4121-32l000
AMT-
26.52 DESC-NSP/UTILITY BILLING
VENDOR TOTAL 92.32
92.f
H4300 NORTHSTAR AUIOMOTIVE 29070
12/12/89
2-110254 11/16/89 11.50
11.`.
ACCOUNT NUMBER-
100-4260-122000
AMT-
11.50 DESC-NORTHSTAR AUTO/U-JOINTS
VENDOR TOFAL 11.50
ll.:
P3765 PITNEY BOWES INC 29071
12/12/89
064255 11/13/89 78.50
78.`
ACCOUNT NUMBER-
100-4190-401000
AMT-
78.50 DESC-PITNEY BOWES/POSTAGE MACHINE
VENDOR TOTAL 78.50
78.'
P595 l-"OST PUBLICATIONS 29072
12/12!B9
003BS25 11/15/89 21.34
21.:
.COUNT NUMBER-
100-4100-341000
AMT-
21.34 DESC-POST PUBLICATION/ADS
29072
12/12/89
003BS27 11/15/89 13.05
13.(
ACCOUNT NUMBER-
100-2303-000767
AMT-
13.05 DESC-POST PUBLICATIONS/ADS
29072
12/12/89
003B526 11/15/89 13.05
19.(
ACCOUNT NUMBER.-
100-2303-000955
AMT-
13.05 DESC-POST PUBLICATIONS/ADS
29072
12/12/09
0038505 11/09/89 26.19
26.:
ACCOUNT NUMBER-
100-4100-341000
AMT-
26.19 DESC-POST PUBLICATIONS/ADS
VENDOR FOfAL 73.63
73.c
R0760 RAMSEY COUNTY PTAC 29073 12/12/99
214 11/22/09 204.00
204.(
ACCOUNT NUMBER-
100-4200-363000
AMT-
204.00 DESC-PFAC/ADV DRIVING COURSE
VENDOR TOTAL 204.00
204.(
RI000 RAMSEY RECYCLING, INC* 29074 12/12/89
12/05/09 2520.67
2520.,
ACCOUNT NUMBER-
290-4121-303000
AMT-
2520.67 DESC-RAMSEY RECYCLING/OC1ObER
VENDOR TOTAL 2520.67
2520.,
R5610 ROBERT PAUL TV
29075 12/12/89
28704 11/27/89 518.00
518.1
ACCOUNT NUMBER-
270-4120-160000
AMT-
518.00 DESC-ROBERT PAUL TV/TV & VCR
29075 12/12/09
2775 11/27/89 518.00
518.,
ACCOUNT NUMBER-
270-4120-160000
AMT-
518.00 DESC-ROBERf PAUL TV/TV & VCR
VENDOR 1OTAL 1036.00
1036.(
R5950 PAM ROSE
29076 12/12/89
11/13/39 150.00
150.(
PAGE 6
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER
AP-CIO-01
MOUNDS VIEW
VENDOR
CHECK
CHECK
INVOICE INVOICE DISCOUNT
CHEC
NO VENDOR
NAME
NUMBER
DATE
INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT
AMOUt-
iCOUNT
NUMBER-
100-4100-020000
AMT-
75.00 UESC-PAMELA ROSE/MINUTES 11-13-89
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-
100-4100-020000
AMT-
75.00 DESC-PAMELA ROSE/i4INUTES 11-27-89
VENDOR TOTAL 150.00
150.0
S0650 ST PAUL BOOK '.
STATION 29077
12/12/89
926997 11/19/89 26.27
26.2
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-
250-4351-160042
AMT-
14.35 DESC-ST PAUL BOOK 3 STATIONERY/SUPS
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-
250-4351-160017
AMT-
11.92 DESC-ST PAUL BOOK d STATIONERY/SUPS
VENDOR TOTAL 26.27
` 6.2i
S3225 SHORT ELLIOTT
8 HENDR* 29078
12/12/89
S854 11/13/09 677.40
677.-0
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-
650-4120-303000
AMT-
46.81 UESC-SEH/MV BUSINESS PARK
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-
410-4120-705000
AMf-
163.61 DESC-SEH/SILVER VIEW PK S&W SERVICE
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-
410-4120-705000
AMT-
78.28 DESC-SEH/SILVER VIEW PK CULVERT
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-
410-4120-705000
AMT-
388.70 DESC-SEH/SILVER VIEW PK TRAIL -
29078
12/12/89
5852 11/18/89 2955.18
2955.1
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-
420-4121-303000
AMT-
2955.18VENDOR SEH/S.W.M•DTOTAL
3632.58
3632..`
S5605 SNYDERS DRUG SfORES
29079
12/12/89
015878 11/27/89 20.88
20•E
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-
100-4200-160000
AMT-
20.88 DESC-SNYDER DRUGS/FILM
29019
12/12/89
OISB76 11/20/89 41.02
41.0
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-
250-4351-160017
AMT-
39.37 DESC-SNYDER DRUGS/FILM
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-
250-4351-160042
AMT-
5.65R DRUGS/PIES
VENDOR TOTALSUPL
bl.�
S645' "TAR TRIBUNE
29080
12/12/89
11/25/89 25.40
25•`
NUMBER-
250-4354-160260
AMT-
25.40 DESC-STAR TRIBUNE/ADS
..COUNT
VENDOR TOTAL 25.40
25.-
S7400 DON STREICHER GUNS 29081
12/12/89
M65741 11/06/89 5.65
5.E
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-
100-4260-122000
AMf-
5.65VENDOR
70TALCHER'S/DASH6BRACKET
5.4
59650 SYSTEMS SUPPLY
INC. 29082
12/12/89
110982 11/27/89 23.90
23•`
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-
100-4180-160000
AMT-
23.90 DESC-SYSTEMS SUPPLY/DISKETTES
VENDOR 'TOTAL 23.70
23.E
U2750 MIKE ULRICH
29003
12/12/89
12/05/89 15.50
15.E
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-
100-4270-124000
AMT-
EL ULRIC15M50A MEETING
15.50VENDOR
TOTAL
15.`
J5000 UNITOG
RENTALS
SYSTEM 29084
12/12/89
12/05/89 20.01
28.E
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-
700-4121-240000
AMT-
28.81 DESC-UNITOG/UNIFORM RENTAL
29084
12/12/87
2833741117 11/17/89 49.75
49
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-
100-4190-329084
TOWEL
80.1
12/12/89
2832141117ESC11117109BL.30
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-
100-4270-240000
AM]-
80.30 UESC-UNITOO/UN IFROM RENTAL
206.2
29064
12/12/89
2832741110 11/10/89 206.21
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-
700-4121-240000
AMT-
206.21VENDOR UNITOO/UN IFORM RENTAL
VENDOR365.0
PAGE 7
AP-C10-01
VENDOR
NO VENDOR NAME
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER
MOUNDS VIEW
CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE DISCOUNT CHEC
NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT AMOUN
V2000 VAN -
0 - LITE
29085
12/12/89
00526360 11/08/89
44.10
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-
100-4190-121000
AMT-
44.10 DESC-VAN 0 LITE/SUPPLIES
VEN➢OR TOTAL
44.10
V4000 VIKING
CHEVROLET
29086
12/12/89
149S64 11/13/89
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-
100-4260-122000
AMT-
.60
.60 DESC-VIKINO CHEV/SPRING
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-
29086
100-4260-122000
12/12/89
AMT-
149565 11/13/89
.56
.56 DESC-VIKING CHEV/SPRING
VENDOR TOTAL
1.16
W1910 WESTBURNE SUPPLY INC 2VO87
12/12/89
B94461 11/15/39
15.68
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-
730-4121-160000
AMT-
15.68 DESC-WESTBURNE
SUPPLY/PARTS
VENDOR TOTAL
15.68
44.1
44.1
.6
.5:
1.1
15a
15.6
GRAN➢ TOTAL 33893.82 33883.E
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PRE••PAID CHECK REGISTER
PAGE 1
MOUNDS VIEW
AP-CIO-02
CHECK.
CHECK
INVOICE INVOICE DISCOUNT
CHEC
VENDOR
NAME
NUMBER
DATE
INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT
AMOUl-
NO VENDOR
OF
MOUNDS
VIEW 21578
11/21/89
11/21/29 500.00
100.C'
M600(I1Y
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-
100-4190-'60000
ANT-
100.00DESC-C OF V/CHR100MAS DECORATIONS
SOO.0
VENDOR TOTAL 00
H3000 HICKOK,
KITTY
21579
11/22/87
11/22.89 53.94
DECORATIONS
53.94VENDOR
53.5
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-
100-4190-160000
ANT-
rofALKOK/CHk153.99
53.5
M6000 CITY OF MOUNDS
VIEW 21580
li/22/89
11/22/89 4.99
F MOUNDS4V99W/CHG FUND
4.5
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-
100-4190-114000
ANT-
4.79VEWDOk TOTAL
4.5
P2165 CITY OF
MOUNDS
VIED 21581
11/27/89
46. 87
11/27/87 -
DESC-PETTY CASH/SUPPLIES
46.E
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-
250-4353-160205
ANT-
8.98
3.53 DESC-PETTY CASH/SUPPLIES
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-
100-4190-160000
ANT-
7.85 DESC-PE1TY CASH/SUPPLIES
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-
100-4120-363000
AMT-
1.90 DESC-PETTY CASH/SUPPLIES
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-
700-4121-160000
ANT-
7.00 DESC-PETTY CASH/SUPPLIES
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-
100-4200-363000
ANT-
ANT-
7.91 DESC-PETTY CASH/SUPPLIES
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-
100-4120-363000
ANT-
5.00 DESC-PETTY CASH/SUPPLIES
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-
250-4353-160205
ANT-
4.25 DESC-PETTY CASH/SUPPLIES
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-
100-4120-363000
ANT-
9
CASH/SU98L82
DESC-PETTYENDOR
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-
100-4190-330000
.40
VTOTAL
46.1
N2045
O NELSON 21582
11/25/89
11/25/89 22.19
ELSON/SU2PLi9S
22.1
'T
'COUNT
COUNT
NUMBER-
100-4200-160000
ANT-
22.19VENDOR TOTAL
22.1
91300 C
21583
11/29/89
11/29/89 50.00
_NCSAW SENINR
50.(
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-
700-4121-363000
ANT-
SO.00
VENDOR TOTALWA/HAN5050.00ENSKI
50.0
91301 CUB SCOUT PACK
#367 21584
I1/29/89
11/29/89 24.00
24.00VENDOR-CUB PAC24.07/WREATHS
24.(
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-
100-4190-11400014000
100
ANT-
TOTALSCOUT
24.(
83201 UDIRECT
21585
11/29/89
I1/'29/89 150.00
i50.00_LOTUS SELECTS/UPGRADE
150.(
ACCCOCOUNN T
NUMBER-
100-4190-703000
ANT-
VENDOR fUfAL OO
150.1
P2140
CONTRACTORS 21586
11/29/89
11/29/89 800.00
300.OJVENDOR
800.(
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-
730-2305-000000
ANT-
TOTALERRON/R800.00
800.(
FIkSTAR NEW BRIGHTON * 21�j87 12/01/87
12/01/39 53269.75 53269.i
ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4100-010000 AN1- 1400.00 DESC-GROSS FOR 12-01-89 PAYROLL
ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4120-010000 ANT- 2439.76 DESC-GROSS FOR 12-01-99 PAYROLL
ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4130-010000 ANT- 1936.15 DESC-GROSS FOR 12-01-89 PAYROLL
ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-9150 010000 ANT- 3116.00 DESC-GROSS FOR 12-01-89 PAYROLL
ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4180-010000 ANT- 2277.50 DESC-GROSS FOR 12-01-89 PAYROLL
PAGE 2 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PRE -PAID CHECK REGISTER
AP-CIO-02 MOUNDS VIEW
VENDOR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE DISCOUNT
NO VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT
.:COUNT NUMBER- 100-4180-020000 AMT- 412.SO DESC-GROSS FOR 12-01-89 PAYROLL
ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4190-010000 AMT- 624.00 DESC-GROSS FOR 12-01-89 PAYROLL
ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4200-010000 AMT- 21574.42 DESC-GROSS FOR 12-01-89 PAYROLL
ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4200-011000 AMT- 198.82 DESC-GROSS FOR 12-01-89 PAYROLL
ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4200-020000 AMT- 447.23 DESC-GROSS FOR 12-01-09 PAYROLL
ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4230-010000 AMT- 497.25 DESC-GROSS FOR 12-01-89 PAYROLL
ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4240-020000 AMT- 270.40 DESC-GROSS FOR 12-01-89 PAYROLL
ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-010000 AMT- 1004.80 DESC-GROSS FOR 12-01-87 PAYROLL
ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4260-011000 AMT- 97.62 DESC-GROSS FOR 12-01-89 PAYROLL
ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4270-n10000 AMT- 1998.80 DESC-GROSS FOR 12-01-89 PAYROLL
ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4270-011000 AMT- 327.00 DESC-GROSS FOR 12-01-89 PAYROLL
ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4350-010000 AMT- 3314.04 DESC-GROSS FOR 12-01-89 PAYROLL
ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-010000 AMT- 1996.20 DESC-GROSS FOR 12-01-69 PAYROLL
ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4360-011000 AMT- 170.56 DESC-GROSS FOR 12-01-89 PAYROLL `
ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4351-020002 AMT- 35.00 DESC-GROSS FOR 12-01-89 PAYROLL%
ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4351-020011 AMT- 28.00 DESC-GROSS FOR 12-01-89 PAYROLL
ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4351-020014 AMT- 57.75 DESC-GROSS FOR 12-01-89 PAYROLL
ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4351-020024 AMT- 250.00 DESC-GROSS FOR 12-01-89 PAYROLL
ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4351-020042 AMT- 167.50 DESC-GROSS FOR 12-01-89 PAYROLL
ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4354-020226 AMT- 7.00 DESC-GROSS FOR 12-01-89 PAYROLL
ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4354-020229 AMT- 40.50 DESC-GROSS FOR 12-01-89 PAYROLL
ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4354-020231 AMT- 33.50 DESC-GROSS FOR 12-01-89 PAYROLL
ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4354-020233 AMT- 55.50 DESC-GROSS FOR 12-01-89 PAYROLL
ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4354-020234 AMT- 35.00 DESC-GROSS FOR 12-01-89 PAYROLL
ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4354-020237 AMT- 108.00 DESC-GROSS FOR 12-01-89 PAYROLL
'COUNT NUMBER- 250-4354-020238 AMT- 7.00 DESC-GROSS FOR 12-01-89 PAYROLL
„COUNT NUMBER- 250-4354-020239 AMT- 21.00 DESC-GROSS FOR 12-01-89 PAYROLL
ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4354-020241 AMT- 5.50 DESC-GROSS FOR 12-01-89 PAYROLL
ACCOUNT YUMBER- 250-4354-020244 AMT- 131.50 DESC-GROSS FOR 12-01-89 PAYROLL
ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4354-020245 AMT- 7.00 DESC-GROSS FOR 12-01-89 PAYROLL
ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4354-020250 AMT- 119.00 DESC-GROSS FOR 12-01-89 PAYROLL
ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4354-020253 AMT- 25.00 DESC-GROSS FOR 12-01-89 PAYROLL
ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4354-020254 AMT- 47.00 DESC-GROSS FOR 12-01-89 PAYROLL
ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4354-020255 AMT- 26.50 DESC-GROSS FOR 12-01-89 PAYROLL
ACCOUNT NUMBER- 250-4354-020256 AMT- 14.00 DESC-GROSS FOR 12-01-89 PAYROLL
ACCOUNT NUMBER- 260-4121-020000 AMT- 112.00 DESC-GROSS FOR 12-01-89 PAYROLL
ACCOUNT NUMBER- 270-4120-020000 AMT- 56.00 DESC-GROSS FOR 12-01-89 PAYROLL
ACCOUNT NUMBER- 270-4121-020000 AMT- 189.00 DESC-GROSS FOR 12-01-89 PAYROLL
ACCOUNT NUMBER- 290-4121-010000 AMT- 57.69 DESC-GROSS FOR 12-01-89 PAYROLL
ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4120-010000 AMT- 1612.15 DESC-GROSS FOR 12-01-89 PAYROLL
ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4121-010000 AMT- 1993.60 DESC-GROSS FOR 12-01-89 PAYROLL
ACCOUNT NUMBER- 700-4121-011000 AM1- 121.49 DESC-GROSS FOR 12-01-89 PAYROLL
ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4120-010000 AMT- 1628.95 DESC-GROSS FOR 12-01-89 PAYROLL
ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4121-010000 AMT- 1998.80 DESC-GROSS FOR 12-01-89 PAYROLL
ACCOUNT NUMBER- 730-4121-011000 AMT- 233.63 DESC-GROSS FOR 12-01-89 PAYROLL
21598 12/01/89 12/01/89 2123.77
ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4100-031000 AMT- 1.98 DESC-1ST STAR /FICA FOR 12-01-89
ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4120-030000 AMT- 177.34 DESC-1ST STAR /FICA FOR 12-01-89
ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4130-030000 AMT- 145.40 DESC-1ST STAR /FICA FOR 12-01-89
ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4150-030000 AMT- 215.38 DESC-1ST STAR /FICA FOR 12-01-89
CHEC
AMOUR
2123.;
ACCOUNTS
PAYABLE PRE -PAID CHECK REGISTER
PAGE 3
MOUNDS VIEW
AP-C10-02
CHECY
CHECK
INVOICE
INVOICE
DISCOUNT
CHEC
VENDOR
NUMBEP
DATE
INVOICE
NMBR DATE
AMOUNT
AMOUNT
AMOU1
NO VENDOR
NAME
1
NUMBER-
100-4180-030000
ANT-
195.55
DESC-1ST STAR
/FICA FOR
12-01-09
.COUNT
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-
100-4190-030000
ANT-
46.86
DESC-1ST STAR
/FICA FOR
/FICA FOR
12-01-89
12-01-89
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-
100-4200-080000
AMT-
99.98
DESC-ISI' STAR
STAR
/FICA FOR
12-01-89
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-
100-4200-031000
AM1-
31.66
35.38
DESC-1ST
DESC-1ST STAR
/FICA FOR
12-01-89
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-
100-4230-030000
AMT-
20.31
DESC-1ST S1AR
/FICA FOR
12-01-89
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-
100-4240-030000
AM1-
"3.72
DESC-1ST STAR
/FICA FOR
12-01-69
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-
100-4260-030000
ANT-
AMT-
165.54
DESL-IST STAR
/FICA FOR
12-01-89
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-
100-4270-030000
ANT-
239.76
DESC-1ST STAR
/FICA FOR
12-01-89
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-
100-4350-030000
158.16
DESC-1ST STAR
/FICA FOR
12-01-89
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-
100-4360-030000
AMT-
1.50
DESC-1ST STAR
/FICA FOR
12-01-89
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-
250-4351-030000
AMT-
7.52
DESC-1ST STAR
/FICA FOR
12-01-89
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-
250-4351-031000
AMT--
ANT-
13.67
DESC-1ST STAR
/FICA FOR
12-01-89
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-
250-4354-030000
7.30
DESC-1ST STAR
/FICA FOR
12-01-8%
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-
250-4354-031000
AMT-
DESC-1ST STAR
/FICA FOR
12-01-89.
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-
260-4121-03i000
ANT-
1.62
DESC-1S1' STAR
/FICA FOR
12-01-89
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-
270-420-03:000
ANT-
.81
2.74
DESC-1ST STAR
/FICA FOR
12-01-89
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-
270-4121-031000
ANT-
4.33
DESC-1ST STAR
/FICA FOR
12-01-99
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-
20-4121-03000
AMT-
AMT-
78.60
DESC-SSi STAR
/FICA FOR
12-01-89
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-
700-4120-030000
149.71
DESC-1ST STAR
/FICA FOR
12-01-89
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-
700-4121-030000
All'-
163.09
DESC-1ST STAR
/FICA FOR
12-01-89
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-
730-4121-010000
AMT-
VENDOR TOTAL
55393.52
55393.:
P7900 PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREM*
21589
12/01/89
12/01/89
DESC-PERA FOR
3738.95
12-01-89
PAYROLL
3738.!
^`COUNT
NUMBER-
100-4120-033000
AMT-
42.47
86.74
DESC-PERA FOR
12-01-89
PAYROLL
COUNT
NUMBER-
100-4130-033000
ANT-
AMT-
139.60
DESC-PERA FOR
12-01-89
PAYROLL
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-
100-4150-033000
AMT-
63.34
DESC-PERA FOR
12-01-89
PAYROLL
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-
100-4180-083000
ANT-
27.76
DESC-PERA FOR
12-01-89
PAYROLL
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-
100-4190-033000
AM'F-
59.64
DESC-PERA FOR
12-01-89
PAYROLL
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-
100-4200-033000
2506.70
DESC-PERA FOR
12-01-89
PAYROLL
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-
100-4200-084000
AMT-
ANT-
12.11
DESC-PERA FOR
12-01-89
PAYROLL
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-
100-4240-033000
46.7O
DESC-PERA FOR
12-01-89
PAYROLL
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-
100-4260-033000
AMT-
AMT-
104.20
DESC-PERA FOR
12-01-89
PAYROLL
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-
100-4270-033000
AMT-
148.48
DESC-PERA FOR
12-01-89
PAYROLL
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-
100-4350-033000
AMT-
9?.07
DESC-PERA FOR
12-01-89
PAYROLL
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-
100-4360-033000
AMT-
DESC-PERA FOR
12-01-89
PAYROLL
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-
250-4351-033000
.89
DESC-PERA FOR
-01-89
PAYROLL
ACCOUNT
NO
250-4354-033000
AMT-
ANT -
?.58
DESC-PERA FOR
1jS
?-01 89
PAYROLL
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-
290-4121-033000
AMT-
44.94
DESC-PERA FOR
12-01-89
PAYROLL
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-
700-4120-032000
53.46
DESC-PERA FOR
12-01-89
PAYROLL
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-
700-4120-033000
AMT-
AMT-
94.76
DESC-PERA FOR
12-01-89
PAYROLL
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-
700-4121-033000
44.22
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-
130-4120-032000
AMT-
DESC-PERA FOR
12-01 89
PAYROLL
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-
730-4120-033000
AMT-
AMT-
!00.01VENOOk
S9PAYROLL
12-0385
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-
/30-4121-033000
TORALFOR
3738.'
66970 GROUP
HEALTH PLAN, INz 21590
12/01/87
12/O1/89
HEALTH
5946.65
FOR DECEMBER
5946.e
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-
100-4120-040000
AM1-
149.70
DESC-GROUP
ACCOUNTS
PAYABLE PRE -PAID CHECK REGISTER
GE 4
-C10-02
MOUNDS VIEW
INVOICE INVOICE DISCOUNT
CHEC
NDOR
NO VENDOR
NAME
CHECK
NUMBER
CHECK
DATE
INVOICE
NMBR DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT
AMOUN
NUMBER-
100-4130-040000
AMT-
163.87
DESC-GROUP HEALTH FOR DECEMBER
.COUNT
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-
100-4150-040000
AMT-
499.00
DESC-GROUP HEALTH FOR DECEMBER
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-
100-4180-040000
AMT-
159.63
DESC-GROUP HEALTH FOR DECEMBER
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-
100-4190-040000
AM1-
190.50
DESC-GROUP HEALTH FOR DECEMBER
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-
100-4260-040000
AM'T-
199.60
DESC-GROUP HEALTH FOR DECEMBER
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-
100-4200-040000
AM1-
2429.50
DESC-GROUP HEALTH FOR DECEMBER
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-
100-4270-040000
AMT-
399.20
DESC-GROUP HEALTH FOR DECEMBER
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-
100-4230-040000
AMT-
49.90
DESC-GROUP HEALTH FOR DECEMBER
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-
100-4350-040000
AMT-
379.20
DESC-GROUP HEALTH FOR DECEMBER
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-
100-4360-040000
AMT-
199.60
DESC-GROUP HEALTH FOR DECEMBER
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-
700-4120-040000
AMT-
206.44
DESC-GROUP HEALTH FOR DECEMBER
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-
700-4121-040000
AMT-
399.20
DESC-GROUP HEALTH FOR DECEMBER
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-
730-4120-040000
AMT-
206.46
DESC-GROUP HEALTH FOR DECEMBER
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-
730-4121-040000
AMT-
294.85VENDOR
HEALT5946Ob5H FOR ECEMBER_
5946,E
TOOAL
050 ICMA RETIREMENT
CORPO* 21591
12/01/69
133.67
12/01/89 178.22
DESC-ICMA FOR 11-17-89 AND 12-01-89
178.2
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-
100-4120-035000
AMT-
AM1-
44.55VENDOR
11-17-89 AND 12-01-89
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-
100-4230-035000
TOMAALFOR
17B.22
178.:
675 MINNESOTA MUTUAL LIFE 21592
12/01/89
3.40
12/01/89 13.60
DESC-MINNESOTP MUTUAL FOR DECEMBER
13.E
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-
100-4120-040000
AMT-
AMT-
3.40
DESC-MINNESOTA MUTUAL FOR DECEMBER
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-
100-4180-040000
100-4200-040000
AMT-
6.80yENDCR
MUTUALR DECEMBER
LOTAL
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-
TINNESOTA
60
13.t
425 FIDELITY 3 GUARANTY L* 21593
12/01/89
1.45
12/01/89 101.50
DESC-FID AND GUARANTY FOR DECEMBER
1 •-
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-
100-4120-040000
AMT-
AMT-
4.35
DESC-FID AND GUARANTY FOR DECEMBER
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-
NUMBER-
100-4130-040000
100-4150-040000
AMT-
10.15
DESC-FID AND GUARANTY FOR DECEMBER
ACCOUNT
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-
100-4180-040000
AMT-
3.41
DESC-FID AND GUARANTY FOR DECEMBER
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-
100-4190-040000
AMT-
2.90
DESC-FID AND GUARANTY FOR DECEMBER
DECEMBER
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-
100-4260-040000
AMT-
2.90
DESC-FID AND GUARANTY FOR
AND GUARANTY FOR DECEMBER
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-
100-4200-040000
AMT-
AMT-
40.60
5.80
DESC-FID
DESC-FID AND GUARANTY FOR DECEMBER
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-
NUMBER-
100-4270-040000
100-4230-040000
AMT-
1.45
DESC-FID AND GUARANTY FOR DECEMBER
ACCOUNT
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-
100-4350-040000
AMT-
5.80
DESC-FID AND GUARANTY FOR DECEMBER
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-
100-4360-040000
AMT-
2.90
DESC-FID AND GUARANTY FOR DECEMBER
GUARANTY FOR DECEMBER
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-
/00-4120-040000
AMT-
4.09
5.80
DESC-FID AND
DESC-FID AND GUARANTY FOR DECEMBER
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-
700-4121-040000
AMT-
AMT-
4.10
DESC-FID AND GUARANTY FOR DECEMBER
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-
730-4120-040000
730-4121-040000
AMT-
5.80
GUARANTY50 R DECEMBER
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-
VENDOR
fODAAND
101.:
250 LMCIT HEALTH PROTECTI* 21594
12/01/89
100.40
12/01/09 381.60
DESC-LMCIT FOR DECEMBER
381.c
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-
100-4120-040000
100-4180-040000
AMT-
AMT-
100.40
DESC-LMCIT FOR DECEMBER
ACCOUNT
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-
NUMBER-
100-4200-040000
AMT-
200.80
DESC-LMCIIFOR DECEMBER
ACCOUNI
NUMBER-
100-4190-480000
AMT-
20.00-
DESC-LMCIT FOR DECEMBER
GE 5
RCCOUNTS PAYABLE PRE -PAID CHECK REGISTER
-C10-02
MOUNDS VIEW
NDOR
CHECK
CHECK
INVOICE
INVOICE DISCOUNT
CHEC
NO VENDOR NAME
NUMBER
DATE
INVOICE NMBR DATE
AMOUNT AMOUNT
AMCUH
VENDOR TOTAL
381.60
381.6
D14 JACK CHAMBERS
21595
12/01/89
12/01/89
35.19
35.1
ACCOUNT NUMBER-
100-4190-160000
AMT-
35.19 DESC-JACK CHAMBERS/CHRISTMAS DECORA
VENDOR TOTAL
35.19
35.1
201 STEPPINGSTONE
THEATER 21596
12/01/89
12/01/89
14.00
14.0
ACCOUNT NUMBER-
250-4852-160107
AMT-
14.00 DESC-STEPPING
STONE TREA./PARK 8 RE
VENDOR TOTAL
14.00
14.0
l30 GLENN REHBEIN EXCAVATE 21577
12/01/B9
12/01/89
59364.36
59364.3
ACCOUNT NUMBER-
593-4120-705000
AMT- 59364.36 DESC-GLENN REHBEIN/MV BUSINESS PARK
VENDOR TOTAL
59364.36
59364.3
*0 CITY OF MOUNDS
VIEW 21598
12/01/89
12/01/89
6.26
6.2
ACCOUNT NUMBER-
100-4190-160000
AMT-
6.26 DESC-CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW/PETTY CASH
VENDOR TOTAL
6.26
6.2
86 DOMINO'S PIZZA
21599
12/04/89
12/04/89
24.54
24.`
ACCOUNT NUMBER-
100-4100-160000
AMT-
24.54 DESC-DOMINO'S
PIZZA/TEAM BUILDING
VENDOR TOTAL
24.54
24.`
GRAND TOTAL
126450.38
126450.0
►fh
APPLICATION FOR ADVISORY GROUPS
QUALIFICATIONS YOU WANT TO HAVE THE COUNCIL CONSIDER
salr:n�,sr:rs —10Well a.;.yver
mySe lt' on barns
crx<t"
Prrwnnc, occupation or Other Ex erience:
iojr. en Cocrd;natmo Fur �E'ke IvWp ar» �rrC&4t
rercl C['o s5. 1'LIX,rdina i y Ncn ncp;n C'a ranc(� OF't(v_
ft I se{c{n(3ss<s [�;tl, sCkoo/
LTO/nrn�c_nity C<d• &�:c!vsl a.C<L�/es i,[ C4G tJLI) Htiinc Q'n dre d, S
tka newaleCle'r, /'![':cs [•eleasc._ al"c( (cse/> frsc� pf all
rr, addlh:o>. T Cco rd7na{�c A(r uol u.n teer- mai'.'u7ry i? uard
r oF; 60/[>..r
--luviisnments Or Ott
TCdS%/rndS6'rs
2.L .Ir'a iiOn.]/ mil. �el`C r• Y'csnr
n
(?�tcnpr /
Gr,-�rC grhin u7 /"rGlt'n�/O.1
n rat, able cle �ndab/c y — nerve un This Committee:
P 0,, d h a ur_ �qci,
in 171), CIM,[ e« .,. ttl. 1 C[61 r[� Tu bt ur'Ac i?f;Zlt si
Garnrscw.,i 2 1,uc i,). «C'»>� r7lorY.?ej`[uG /H. t'k{,
=Wur response to any of the above may be continued on the back
and you may attach any other materials which you want the Council
to consider
E
Date //-/3-fq
0�
The City or Mounds View is committed to the policy that all
persons shall have equal access to its programs, facilities, and
employment without regard to race, creed, color, sex, age,
national origin, or handicap.
�2c.o,. � %�. '�F �-*-¢-a; �1 �va.� �' . G%� a.c.a�_z'- .l,Qfi�ect`oti
��� O
� c lu, � . �
�_ 1
.�
d--
fkSMORANDUM
Memo To :Mayor and City Council Members
From :Ric Minetor, Director of Public j orks
Date :November 21, 1989
Subject :Street Light Installation on Spring Lake Road
8419 Spring Lake Road - Steve Melby
Attached is a petition for a street light on Spring Lake Road.
The petition does not meet the requirements Of our
res ion olutits
regarding street light installation. The proposed
less than 250 feet from the street light at 8394 Spring Lake
400 feet
Road. The street light installation policy (Resolution 1069 &
Resolution 1354) requires that street lights be le`urves, dead
s sufficient cause du or o shaotherr criteria, then
apart. If there i
ends, pedestrian crosswalks, vandalism,
street lights may be installed at not less than 250 foot
spacings. A street light counld be installed between 8418 and
8430 Spring Lake Road and meet the feels this area foot
sfairly well
other street lights. I personally
lit and question the effectiveness of a new installation at
preventing crime. I do not believe it would be beneficial for
' traffic safety. The resident would still have ath hispcost) of
installing a yard security light on his property
I recommend denial of this request.
3;_�;
v -
79
-'Jtt� 6AU4
We, the unaersign=-
installed at YO
STREET LIGHT PETITION
' 7�G -ySsS
do hereby request that a street light be
SWA4 e 4 Ors eo
NAME (please print) ADDRESS
�� 1 •Sieve m216y �-19 SPRu.;q Lk Aaek ,to
�z.
SIGNATURE
- 2 -
n
11
TO: RIC MINETOR
FROM: POLICE CHIE
DATE: NOVEMBER 20, 1989
SUBJECT: REPORTED CRIMES 8400 BLOCK SPRING LAKE ROAD
THE FOLLOWING IS THE CRIME HISTORY (THEFTS. BURGLARY, VANDALISM)
AT MELBY'S RESIDENCE (8419 SPRING LAKE ROAD),
12-21-86 THEFT
1-11_-87 BURGLARY
4-7-81 VANDALISM
li-15-88 THEFT
12-23-88 THEFT
10-8-89 VEHICLE THEFT
ALSO THE FOLLOWING CRIME ACTIVITY HAS OCCURRED FROM NORTH OF 8370
SPRING LAKE ROAD TO COUNTY ROAD J FROM 1-1-89 TO PRESENT,
7-12-89 - 8430 SPRING LAKE ROAD - VANDALISM
8-13-89 - 8469 SPRING LAKE ROAD - VANDALISM
10-11-89 - 8493 SPRING LAKE ROAD - THEFT
COMPILATION Or .
RESOLUTION No. 1069 AND
RESOLUTION NO. 1354
CITY OF HOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
,N STREETLIGUT INS...-LATION Pol,ICY REPLACING
RESOLUTION No. 946
W11HREAS, each year the City Council recnives several requests
for Elm installation of stree LLights; and
WIIIiREAS, the ce'L of operating Lliuhts in a large budget
i Lem; and
WIIEREnS, the City Council desires to maintain and enhance the
safety of its neighborhoods through the provision of streetlights
while at the same time keeping the tax burden of operating street-
lights at a minimum;
NOW, TIIERF.FORC'; DE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of
Mounds Vier that tlm following policy shop govern tlln installation
Of streetlights at a minimum;
NOW, TM -NI 1,01:li, BE IT RESOLVED by tic, Council of the City of
Mounds Vier that tltc following ()olicy shall govern the installation
of street Ligi)ts in residential areas: .
(1) Property owners desiring installation of streetlights
shall submit a petition requesting such with the
signatures of at least fifty percent of the affected
Property owners. All signatures of persons on the
petition shall mean their consent to the location of
the light, on or near their property. The petition
shall include signatures of consent of the property
owner directly affected by the final location unless
it is determined by the City Co,.ncil that the requested _ streetlight is in the interest of preserving the health
and safety of residents of the area. A property owner
shall be deemed to be affected if his/her property is
within 200 feet In any street direction from the pro-
posed streetlight location on either side of the street.
A property owner directly affected shall be one whose
Property the light is on, abut[', or is directly
adjacent (opposite side of street).
(2) The proposed location shall meet at least one of the
following criteria: Intersections, sharp curves, cul de
sacs, dead ends, long blocks, vandalized areas, or mid,
block Pedestrian crosswalks. A 'bowing of need for a
similar criteria may also qua Ii fy.. The cri Loris muet be
related to a need for publ le uafety.
(3) All strectlights shall be 'Paced at least 40D feet apart
unless the above criteria apply. III no case shall lights
be closer than 250 feet to one another.
(4) All new streetlight installations shall be 100 watt high
Pressure sodium at a 30 foot mounting height. ,.
(5) Strectllghts shall be included in all public Improvement
projects according to the above criteria.
(6) pual)fyinq requests for streetlights may be scheduled
for installation in a subsequent year if the City Council
determines snffieient funds are not available in the cur-
rent City budget.
Adopted the Ilth day of February, Mo (Her" ULinn No. 1069)
and the loth day of September, 1991 (Resolution No. 1354).
MEMO TO: MAYOR. AND CITY COUNrN, �7sm ZX-3
FROM: CLERK-ADMINISTRAT
DATE: DECEMBER 1, 1989
SUBJECT: AUDREY ALMENDINGER'S PROBATIONARY PERIOD
PERFORMANCE REVIEW
Audrey Almendinger, the City Receptionist, completed her six
month probationary period with the City on December 1,
1989. I completed a performance review on Audrey on
November 30th and determined that her performance at this
time meets the City's expectations for an individual having
only six months experience on their job and with City
government. The review identified certain areas where
Audrey's performance could be improved and she has worked
hard in the past at addressing any specific problem areas.
Also identified during the review was the reed for
additional training which is currently being identified at
this time for 1990.
Based upon this review, it is my recommendation that the
Council adopt Resolution No. 2571 making Audrey Almendinger
a full time employee of the City with a $.20 per hour
increase in her wages consistent with her original agreement
for employment with the City. This pay increase would be
effective December 1, 1989.
DFP/MJS
Attachment: Resolution No. 2571
hbULUTION NO. 2571
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION APPROVING PERMANENT
OF ALEMINDER
ASA FULLTIMEEMPLOYEE
WHEREAS, the City defines a permanent full-time employee
as one who has successfully completed the required probationary
period of six months; and
WHEREAS, Audrey Almendinger has successfully completed her
probationary period as determined by a recently completed
performance review.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Mounds View does hereby appoint Audrey Almendinger
as a permanent full-time City employee.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City
of hounds View approve a $.20 per hour adjustment to Audrey
Almendinger's salary as of December 1, 1989.
Adopted this day of , 1989.
ATTEST: Mayor
(SEAL) Clerk -Administrator
..� RESOLUTION NO. 2576
f
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING MAYOR AND CLERK -ADMINISTRATOR
TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF
MOUNDS VIEW AND RAMSEY RECYCLING, INC.
WHEREAS, the City currently has a contract with Ramsey
Recycling, Inc. for recycling services in Mounds View which
expires on December 31, 1989; and
WHEREAS, the City is considering organized garbage
collection for the entire City as a whole with a possible
implementation date of April 1, 1990; and
WHEREAS, the City must enter into a contract for the
interim period.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Mounds View authorizes its Mayor and Clerk -
Administrator to execute an agreement between the City of Mounds
View and Ramsey Recycling, Inc. for recycling services.
ATTEST:
(SEAL)
C
Adopted this llth day of December, 1989.
Mayor
Clerk -Administrator
L
MEMO TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
p�6
PROM; LIEUTENANT DAVE BRICK
DATE: NOVEMBER 30, 1989
SUBJECT: ANIMAL POUND CONTRACT
-a - 5
Attached please find a draft of the proposed Animal Pound
Contract Between Brighton Veterinary Clinic and the City of
Mounds View. This contract was developed by staff and
reviewed and agreed upon by the Clerk-Admininstrator and
City Attorney as well as by Dr. Keith Hedges of the Brighton
Veterinary Clinic.
DB/MJS
C
ANIMAL POUND CONTRACT
An agreement b" 'A hcrwonn the Citv of Mounds View,
a a,un cipal rnrooration, hereinafter called the City, and
Dr. Keith Hedges, doing business as the Brighton Veterinary
Clinic, 2615 Mississippi Straet, New Brighton, Minnesota,
hereinafter referred to as the Poundkeeper, for and in
consideration of the covenants and agreements herein contained,
the parties agree as follows:
1. That the Poundkeeper warrants that it has good
and sufficient facilities for the impounding,
keeping and care of dogs and cats which may be
brought to it by the City.
2. That the Foundkeeper will receive, keep, board
and care for all animals entrusted to them by
the City.
3. That the Poundkeeper will receive and properly
dispose of all dead animals delivered by the
City for a cost of $11.00 per animal.
4. The Poundkeeper shall train the City animal
wardens in the safe and humane handling and
apprehension of animals.
5. The Poundkeeper shall, in all cases except where deemed
inappropriate by the Poundkeeper, administer
distemper vaccine to all animals impounded and
shall attend to the medical needs of all animals.
The City shall pay to the Poundkeeper fifty
percent (50%) of the costs incurred by reason
of this paragraph unless the animal owner claims
their animal, then the owner shall pay all costs.
6. If any animals shall not be reclaimed by the
owner within five (5) regular business days, as
defined in MSA 35.71, the City shall have no
right or interest in such animal and the Pound -
keeper may dispose of such animal in a proper and
humane manner or in accordance with the provisions
of MSA 35.71, Su'od. 3. Animals which may have been
impounded for the required five day period and not
reclaimed by their owner may be sold to persons other
than the owner upon payment of all fees due to the City.
he sum
7$6e001ty persdaylforyto eachthe dogpounkeeer boardedpandt of
$5.00
per day for each cat boarded, but not to exceed
seven (7) days. The City shall pay the Pound -
keeper $19.00 for each animal destroyed up to
40 pounds, and $22.00 for each animal destroyed
over 40 pounds. These animals shall be destroyed
in a proper and humane manner. The City shall pay
WO
the Poundkeeper $11.00 for any deceased animal brought
in. The City will not pay the Poundkeeper any
impounding fees. If a dog must be kept in isolation the
fee per dal, shalt he S7.00. For a cat kept in
isolation, the fee shall be $6.00 per day.
B. The Poundkeeper shall be authorized to collect
fees for violations of animal ordinances and to
issue dog licenses for and on behalf of the City.
All fees and fines collected shall be remitted
to the City with the monthly statement described
in paragraph 12, together with any records or
certifications which may be requested by the
City of Mounds View. The issuance of all
licenses and collection of fines described in this
paragraph shall be limited to written authority of the
City of Mounds View and governed by written instructions
of the City of Mounds View. The City shall indemnify,
hold harmless, and defend the Poundkeeper from all
claims, demands, damages, costs or judgements caused by
or arising out of the negligence of the City, its
officers, agents, or employees in the performance of its
duties under this paragraph 8, and shall indemnify, hold
harmless and defend the Poundkeeper in all claims,
' demands, damages, costs or judgements caused by or
arising out of the collection of fines or issuance
of licenses by Poundkeeper, provided Poundkeeper
exercises reasonable care and good faith and is
acting under the instructions of the City
providing further that the limit,,;nf the Citv's
liability under this paragraph 8 shall not exceed
the limits of the City's applicable liability
insurance or the limitations of liability provided
by Minnesota Statutes, Section 466.04, whichever
is greater.
9. The Poundkeeper shall not release any impounded
animal until the necessary fees have been paid.
For any unlicensed dog brought into the
custody of the Poundkeeper, such dog shall not be
released until a license for the animal has been
obtained by the owner. Nor shall any dog be
released until proof of a current rabies shot is
shown or until vaccine for rabies has been
administered to the animal.
10. In addition to the per day boarding fee, and
fees paid to destroy animals, the City shall pay
to the Poundkeeper the sum of $75.00 per month
in administrative fees and expenses to the Pound -
keeper.
MIM
11. The Poundkeeper shall keep the Pound open
during the normal busin
dischargeurs animals1ty durHngltheir
The Foundkeaper --lon as the fees are paid and
as 9
business hours
requirements
ccurate
r
12• The impounded, boarded, shall, at all times, keep destroyed,
records of all animals
sold, pursuant to this Agree-
v dog licenses
a minimum and Citwill meet the requirements of
itemized
ment which at
Subd. 3 and shall furnish monthly
M.S. §35.71
statements to the City•
13. The Pound shall be open at all reasonabletimes
through its agents or
for inspection by the City
employees.
14. The Poundkeeper shall be responsible for all
by the animals
damages, harm or illness suffered
and in its custody which may be due
Pound -
under its care
to the negligence of the Poundkeeper. Said
harmless from any damages,
keeper shall save the City cads
of action, or claidama
sms
costs, actions or causes
the City for any the Pound -
against from
death and property damage resulting
keeper's operation.
and
•
To accomplish this, the Poundkeepr shall procure
general liability
keep in full force comprehensive
of not sanyanumber
aandn$600,000
insurance inthefort of
to safe -
for any le occurrence
the
arising out othe
claims City from any of
guard and indemnify Policy
Such insurance po Y
occurrences aforementioned.
Clerk -Administrator..
must be filed with the
15. This Agreement shall take effect on and after
in effectfrom y
ion by eitherear
January 1, 1990 and shall continue.
subject totaersm=a�ten notice of its
to year thereafter
d
giving sixty (60) Y
party upon
intent to terminate this Agreement.
Dated this __ of 19_
CITY OF MOUNDS VIE'A
WITNESS:
B
y Sue Hankner, Mayor
By Donald Pauley, Clk.-Adminlstrator S
BRIGHTON VETERINARY CLINIC
By
Dr• Keith Hedges
Z¢'E m2 X `%
•
11
M;4.' = i
Memo To :Mayor and City Council Members
t redo. C Public IY� Engineer
r'Y�in :Ric i4inetuF, ut.a.o..w.. O. .4cr. /City
AD �
Date :December 6, 1989
Subject :County Road I - supplemental Agreement
Contractor Delay due to Right -of -Way Negotiations
Ramsey County is in the process of finaling this project. The
last remaining item of contantion is the contractor's claim for
damages due to delays to the project schedule caused by right-6f-
way negotiations. The attached supplemental agreement authorizes
the oavment of this claim on a lump sum basis. The claim amount
is for $15,656.82 as noted on the attached letter from
Progressive Contractors Incorporated. The County has determined
that this is a valid claim under the provisions of the
specifications.
I have reviewed this matter and recommend approval and
authorization for the Mayor to sign the supplemental agreement on
the behalf of the City.
RAMS&Y COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
350 St. Peter, Suite 270 NOV 171989
St. Paul, MN 55102
SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT
Contractor.
Progressive Contractors Incorporated
Project Location:
County Road I
T.H. 10 to 1-35W
This Contract is amended as follows:
Contractor's Address:
8736 Zachary Lane
Osseo, MN 55369
Project Description:
Road Reconstruction
Supp. to Contract No. CC 100166
No. f
NOV a 7 *%hee.t 1 of 2
state Proj. No.:
62-603-05
County Proj. No:
47356
The Contract provides for the reconstruction of the roadway Including storm sewer, concrete pavement
and a city sanitary sewer.
After construction had begun, the Contractor was delayed because right of way needed for the sanitary
sewer construction was not available.
T (,ontractor has submitted a claim for his extra costs for placing concrete pavement incurred In
196d due to this right of way acquisition delay.
The Engineer has determined that this is a valid claim in accordance with Mn/DOT Spec. 1517.
Funding for these costs is to be 100% City funds.
Payment for this work shall be on a Lump Sum basis in accordance with Mn/DOT Spec. 1904. The
Contractor shall not make claim of any kind or character whatsoever for any other costs or expens6
which he may have incurred or which he may hereafter incur in performing the work and furnishing
the materials required by this agreement.
Recommend Approval:
EcfE
onear Date
.{y(jw.a.� U 7 �• c
District State Aid Engineer Date
City of Mounds VirTw Dete
Executive Director Date
Department Director Date
Budgeting and Accounting Date
2-�-e rmI: X-7
IBMORANp[JM
Memo To :Mayor and City Council Members
From :Ric Minetor, Director of Public
works/City Engineer
Date :December 6, 1989 `
subject :County Road I - Supplemental Agreement
Contractor Delay due to Right -of -Way Negotiations
Ramsey County is in the process of finaling this project. The
last remaining item of contention is the contractor's claim for
damages due to delays to the project schedule caused by right-df-
way negotiations. The attached supplemental agreement authorizes
the payment of this claim on a lump sum basis. The claim amount
is for $15,656.82 as noted on the attached letter from
Progressive Contractors Incorporated. The County has determined
that this is a valid claim under the provisions of the
specifications.
I have reviewed this matter and recommend approval and
authorization for the Mayor to sign the supplemental agreement on
the behalf of the City.
M
......... .
�® PROGRESSIVE CONTRACTORS INCORPORATED
67362scharyLane • Osseo, Mlr `36L4'O� ne (61)) 424:5605
PUBLIC W02 /1K i6�2) 424.5605
t
October 18, 1989
fir. Robert Paine
Ramsey County Public Works
3377 No. Rice St.
St. Paul, MN 55112
OCT 19 1989
Re: County Road I
Dear Sir:
Per your request, I am enclosing the following information as backup for
our delay claim on this job.
' 1. Invoice from Gemstone Products documenting the 1713 cy of concrete
we used to finish the paving in May of 1988. their unit
nidvayprice
of
$27.50/cy plus tax is a "picked up" price
2. A breakdown of our haul costs for transporting the concrete from the
Cemstone plant to the project.
3. A copy of a letter dated September 29, 1987 from PCI to the City of
New Brighton verifying that we were moving our concrete batch plant
off the documentation cfrom the City t at the 1thatgwescould efind. noThe arequest was
did written
verbal one.
4. Copy of our letter of explanation and original cost breakdown dated
November 21, 1988.
5. Copy of our letter dated May 3.5. 1989 with a further explanation of
the delay.
The difference between our bid price of $40.70/cy and our 1988 cost of
f49.84/cy is $9.14/cy. For the 1713 cy used to complete the project, we
are asking for $15,656.82. As stated in our letter of November 21, 1988,
if ll not
e any further
we can
remobilizationik
of paving laborrare
for
escalation, etc.
1,
AN EOUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
Mr. Rober Paine
Ramsey County Public Works
October 18, 1989
.Page 2
If you have any questions abut this, please feel free to give me a call.
Sincerely, /
PROOFSSIVE/CONTRACTORS, 'INC.x� , --
Ronald E. Gibbons, P.E.
V.P. engineering
REG/pd
Enclosure
W
Memo To :Mayor and City Council Members
From :Ric Minetor, Director of Pubes/City Engineer
Date :December 7, 1;89 )L"
Subject :Agency Agreement with Minnesota Dept. of Transportation
The attached agreement is required by the Minnesota Department of
Transportation to authorize Mn/DDT to act as the City s agent in
accepting federal aid on the City's behalf for road and bridge
construction, improvements, and maintenance. This agreement is
Mrequiedayorrandby state statute. Clerk -Administrator etotenter dinto theiagreement.on the
I recommend adoption of the resolution.
Revised-@*l2,/118
Office of State Aid
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
AGENCY AGREEMENT
This Agreement made and entered into by and between the City
of Mounds View herein after referred to as the "City" and
the Commissioner of Transportation of the State of Minnesota
hereinafter referred to as the "Commissioner",
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, pursuant to M.S. 161.36 the City desires the
Commissioner to act as its agent in accepting federal aid on the
I
City-s behalf, for road and bridge construction and in contracting
L,
for the construction, improvement or maintenance of roads or bridges
financed either in whole or part with federal moneys; and
WHEREAS, M.S. 161.36, Subdivision 2, requires that the terms
and conditions of the agency be set forth in an a;reement;
NOW, THEN, IT IS AGREED:
-I-
That pursuant to M.S. 161.146, the City does hereby appoint
the Commissioner its agent with respect to all federally funded
projects, to accept and receive all federal funds made available for
said projects and to let contracts pursuant to law for the
construction and improvement of local roads and bridges.
-1-
Each contract will be in accordance with plans and special
r iW
provisions for said projects on file in the Department of
Transportation, State Transportation Building, St. Paul, Minnesota
55155, and the latest edition of "Standard Specifications for
Construction" and all amendments thereof, which said plans, special
provisions and specifications are made a part of this agreement by
reference as though fully set forth herein.
In the letting of said contract, it is hereby agreed that the
following procedures shall be followed, to -wit:
A. The Commissioner shall cause the advertisements calling for
bids on said work to be published in the "Construction Bulletin".
He shall also cause advertisements for bids to be published in. the
officially designated newspaper of the City. Said advertisement or
call for bids shall specify that sealed proposals or bids will be
received by the City Purchasing Agent of the City .of Dburds yiE.W on
behalf of the Commissioner as agent of said City. Proposals, plans
and specifications shall be available for the inspection of
prospective bidders at the office of the Department of
Transportation, St. Paul, Minnesota 55155, and at the office of
said City Purchasing Agent and the advertisement shall so state.
The bids received in response to said advertisement for bids shall
be opened for and on behalf of the Commissioner by a District
Engineer of the Department of Transportation or such other engineer
of the Department of Transportation as may be from time to time
selected by the Commissioner. After said bids shall have been
opened, the City council shall first consider the same and thereupon
—2—
r"141
transmit to the Commissioner all bids received together with its
recomm'M ON that the lowest bid submitted by a responsible bidder
be accepted or that all bids be rejected.
Upon receipt of all said bids, the Commissioner shall duly cause all
of said bids to be tabulated and shall thereupon determine who is
the lowest responsible bidder and shall award the contract to the
lowest responsible bidder or shall reject all bids.
B. The Commissioner shall supervise and have charge of the
construction of said projects after the same has been let. The City
agrees to furnish its City Engineer or other registered engineer and
assign him to the active supervision and direction of the work to be
performed under any contract let for the aforesaid projects. Said
engineer so assigned shall act under the supervision and direction
of the Commissioner.
The City further agrees to furnish such other personnel, services,
supplies and equipment as shall be necessary in order to properly
supervise and carry on said work.
C. The Commissioner may make changes in the plans or the
character of the work as shall be recommended by the engineer in
charge of the work. If he concurs in such recommendations, the
Commissioner may enter into, for and on behalf of the City,
supplemental agreements with the contractor for the performance of
any extra work or work occasioned by any necessary, advantageous, or
desirable change in plans or construction.
It is understood by the City that the Commissioner cannot personally
investigate and pass judgement on the various items of extra work
and plan changes necessary and desirable during the construction of
—3—
F. The Commissioner shall perform on behalf of the City all
--t. fa
other acts and things necessary to cause said projects to be
completed in a satisfactory manner.
G. The Commissioner may enter into any agreement for and on j
behalf of the City with the United States or any officer or agent
thereof that may be required or necessary for the purpose of
procuring and actually causing to be paid the federal aid funds
available for said projects and to that end to bind and commit the
City in such agreement to the performance of any and all things
required by any law of the United States or of any rule and
regulation issued by federal authority pertaining thereto necessary
for the purpose of procuring and having paid the federal aid
available for said projects.
H. It is the policy of the United States Department of
Transportation and the Minnesota Department of Transportation that
Disadvantaged Business Enterprises as defined in 49 CFR, Part 23,
and the Surface Transportation and Uniform Relocation Assistance Act
for 1987, shall have the maximum opportunity to participate in the
performance of contracts financed in whole or in part with federal
funds. Consequently, the requirements of 49 CFR, Part 23, apply to
this agreement. In this regard, the Commissioner and the City shall
take all necessary and reasonable steps in accordance with 49 CFR,
Part 23, to insure that Disadvantaged Business Enterprises have the
maximum opportunity to compete for and perform on contracts and
subcontracts. The Commissioner and the City shall not discriminate
on the basis of race, color, national origin,or sex in the award and
performance of federally funded contracts.
—5—
r,
the projects but that he must delegate such duties to engineers
under his supervision and control that are employed by the Minnesota
Department of Transportation, The City does hereby authorize these
engineers, so delegated by the Commissioner, to enter into, for and
on behalf of the City, the supplemental agreements specified in the
preceding paragraph hereof.
D, The City hereby authorizes its City Engineer, for and on
behalf of the City, from time to time, during the progress of the
work on said projects, to request the Commissioner to furnish for
use on said projects specific engineering services to be performed
by skilled employees of the Minnesota Department of Transportation.
The Commissioner may but is not obligated to furnish the services so
requested. If the Commissioner in compliance with such request --
shall furnish for the use of the City on said projects the services
of any Minnesota Department of Transportation employee, then and in
that event, the City agrees to reimburse the Trunk Highway Fund for
the full cost and expense of the furnishing of such services
including all costs and expenses of any kind or nature whatsoever
arising out of, connected with, or incidental to the furnishing of
such services.
ive the funds to be paid by the
E. The Commissioner shall rece
City and the funds to be paid by the United States as federal aid
funds for said projects and to pay therefrom when due any and all
sums that may become due the contractor to whom the contract is
awarded, and upon final completion and acceptance of the work, to ,
pay from said funds the final estimate to said contractor for said
work.
-4-
C�1
F. The Commissioner shall perform an behalf of the City all
..,. UV
other acts and things necessary to cause said projects to be
completed in a satisfactory manner.
G. The Commissioner may enter into any agreement for and on
behalf of the City with the United States or any officer or agent
thereof that may be required or necessary for the purpose of
procuring and actually causing to be paid the federal aid funds
available for said projects and to that end to bind and commit the
City in such agreement to the performance of any and all things
required by any law of the United States or of any rule and
regulation issued by federal authority pertaining thereto necessary
for the purpose of procuring and having paid the federal aid
available for said projects.
M. It is the policy of the United States Department of
Transportation and the Minnesota Department of Transportation that
Disadvantaged Business Enterprises as defined in 49 CFR, Part 23,
and the Surface Transportation and Uniform Relocation Assistance Act
for 1987, shall have the maximum opportunity to participate in the
I
performance of contracts financed in whole or in part with federal
funds. Consequently, the requirements of 49 CFR, Part 23, apply to
this agreement. In this regard, the Commissioner and the City shall I
take all necessary and reasonable steps in accordance with 49 CFR,
Part 23, to insure that Disadvantaged Business Enterprises have the
maximum opportunity to compete for and perform on contracts and i
subcontracts. The Commissioner and the City shall not discriminate
on the basis of race, color, national origin,or sex in the award and
performance of federally funded contracts.
` -5-
Failure to carry out the above requirements shall constitute a
-Oc►
breach of this agreement and may result in termination of the
agreement or other such remedy that the Connissioner deems
appropriate.
1, The Commissioner may perform on behalf of the City any other
and further acts as may be necessary or required ender any law of
the Ignited States or of any rule or regulation issued by proper
federal authority in order to cause said project! to be completed
and to obtain and receive the federal aid made available therefor.
The City agrees that it will from time to time, after the
execution of this agreement, make such reports, keep such records
and perform such work in such manner and time as the Commissioner
shall from time to time request and direct so as to enable the
Commissioner as its agent to collect for it the ff:eral aid sought.
Said records and reports shall be retained by the ,ity in accordance
with the Commissioner's record retention schedule for federal aid
projects.
-III-
It is anticipated that the United States will pay to the
Commissioner as the agent of the City, the federal aid funds
available to said City toward the construction of said projects. It
is further anticipated that the contracts to be let by the
Commissioner as the agent of the City, for the construction of said
projects shall provide that the contractor, as the work progresses,
shall, from time to time, be paid partial payments designated in
said contract as partial estimates and on the completion and
-6-
f
acceptance of said work to be paid a final payment designated in
said Cor�racgas a final estimate for all work performed.
The City further agrees that any City funds and/or Municipal
State Aid Funds to be applied to any contract covered by this
agreement shall be deposited with the Commissioner in accordance
with Minnesota Rules Chapter 8820.1500 Subp, 3.
At regular monthly intervals after contractors shall have
started work under contracts let by the Commissioner as agent for
the City for the construction of said projects, the engineer
assigned to and in charge of said work shall prepare partial
estimates in accordance with the terms of said contracts let for
said projects and the procedures established by the Office of
Construction and Contract Administration Minnesota Department of
Transportation. The said engineer in charge of said work shall
immediately after preparing each partial estimate, transmit the same
to the Commissioner in duplicate. Each partial estimate shall be
certified by the engineer in charge and by the contractor performing
such work. The said engineer assigned to and in charge of said work
shall also prepare and submit to the Commissioner the final estimate
data, together with the required project records in accordance with
the terms of said contracts let for said projects. Quantities
listed on said partial and final estimates shall be documented in
accordance with the guidelines set forth in the applicable
documentation manual. After the approved final estimate has been
submitted to the Commissioner, the City will pay to the
—7—
r"�,
Commissioner any additional amount which together with the federal
f W
funds received for that project will be sufficient to pay all the
contract costs of the project.
-Iv-
When the contractor shall have completed the work on said
projects, the City agrees to inspect the same and forthwith upon the
completion of said inspection advise the Commissioner whether or not
the work performed should be, by the Commissioner as its agent,
accepted as being performed in a satisfactory manner. In the event
the City should, after said inspection, recommend to the
Commissioner that he should not accept said work, then the City
shall at the time such recommendation is made specify in
particularity the defects in said work and the reasons why the .work.
should not be accepted. It is further agreed that any
recommendations made by the City are not binding on the Commissioner
but that he shall have the right to determine whether or not the
work has been acceptably performed and to accept or reject the work
performed under any said contract.
.v.
It is further agreed that the decision of the Commissioner on
the several matters herein set forth shall be final, binding and
conclusive on the parties hereto.
_vl.
It is anticipated that the entire cost of said projects is to
be paid from funds made available by the United States, by way of
federal aid, and by the City. If for any reason the United States �I
fails to pay any part of the cost or expense of said projects, then
-8-
0
and in that event the City agrees to pay the same. The City further
..w.. !
agrees to pay any and all claims or demands of any kind or nature
whatsoever arising out of or incidental to the performance of the
work under any contract let for said projects in the event that the
United States does not pay the same, and in all events, agrees to
save the State of Minnesota and the Commissioner from said claims
and from any claims arising out of this agreement and to pay any and
all expenses and costs connected with said projects or the
construction thereof which the United States does not pay.
-YII-
The City further agrees that:
A. All right-of-way acquisition and relocation will be conducted
® in accordance with 49 CFR Part 25. Procedures implementing •this
regulation are contained in Mn/DOT State Aid Manual Chapter 5-
892.310.
(Additional guidance may be obtained by referring to the FHWA's Real
Estate Acquisition Guide for Local Public Agencies).
B. If the City receives total direct and indirect federal
assistance of:
1. $100,000 or more per year, the City agrees to obtain a
financial and compliance audit made in accordance with the Single
Audit Act of 1984 (P.L. 98-502) and Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) Circular A-128. The law and circular provide that the audit
shall cover the entire operations of .the City government or, at the
option of the City government, it may cover departments, agencies or
establishments that received, expended, or otherwise administered
federal financia: assistance during the year. However,
-9-
if the City government receives $25,000 or more in General Revenue
r OF
Sharing Funds in a fiscal year, it shall have an audit of its entire
operations.
2. Between $25,000 and $100,000 per year, the City agrees
to obtain either -
a. a financial and compliance audit made in accordance
with the Single Audit Act of 1984 and OMB Circular A-123,. or
b. a financial and compliance audit of all federal
funds. The audit must determine whether the subrecipient spent
federal assistance funds in accordance with applicable laws and
regulations and the audit must be made in accordance with any
federal laws and regulations governing the federal programs the
subrecipient participates in.
Audits shall be made annually unless the state or local
government has, by January 1, 1987 a constitutional or statutory
requirement for less frequent audits. For those governments, the
cognizant agency shall permit biennial audits, covering both years,
if the government so requests. It shall also honor requests for
biennial audits by governments that have an administrative policy
calling for audits less frequent than annual, but only for fiscal
years beginning before January 1, 1987.
The audit shall be made by an independent auditor. An
independent auditor is a state or local government auditor or a
public accountant who meets the independent standards specified in
the General Accounting Office's Standards for Audit of Governmental
Organizations, Programs, Activities, and Functions.
-10-
The audit report shall state that the audit was performed in
--"- I*
accordance with the provisions of OMB Circular A-128 (or A-110 as
applicable).
The audit report shall include:
1) The auditor's report on financial statements and on a
schedule of federal assistance; the financial statements; and a
schedule of federal assistance, showing the total expenditures for
each federal assistance program as identified in the Catalog of
Federal Domestic Assistance. federal programs or grants that have
not been assigned a catalog number shall be identified under the
caption "other federal assistance"
2) The auditor's report on the study and evaluation of
internal control systems must identify the organization's
significant internal accounting controls, and those controls
designed to provide reasonable assurance that federal programs are
being managed in compliance with laws and regulations.
It must also identify the controls that were evaluated, the controls
that were not evaluated, and the material weaknesses identified as a
result of the evaluation.
3) The auditor's report on compliance containing:
a) A statement of positive assurance with respect to
those items tested for compliance, including compliance with law and
regulations pertaining to financial reports and claims for advances
and reimbursements;
b) Negative assurance on those items not tested;
c) A summary of all instances of noncompliance;
-11-
r d) An identification of total amounts questioned, if
any, for each federal assistance awarded, as a result of
noncompliance;
e) A statement on the status of corrective action taken
on prior findings; and
f) Refer to the use of the standards required by the
Minnesota Legal Compliance Audit Guide for Local Governments,
prepared by the Office of the State Auditor. The purpose of this
guide is to establish compliance guidelines for verification by
auditors auditing political subdivisions of the state.
In addition to the audit report, the recipient shall
provide comments on the findings and recommendations in the report,
including a plan for corrective action taken or planned and convents (,
on the status of corrective action taken on prior findings. If
corrective action is not necessary, a statement describing the
reason it is not should accompany the audit report.
The City agrees that the grantor, the Legislative
Auditor, and any independent auditor designated by the grantor shall
have such access to grantee's records and financial statements as
may be necessary for the grantor to comply with the Single Audit Act
and OMB Circular A-128. Required audit reports must be filed with
the Office of the State Auditor. Single Audit Division and state
agencies providing federal assistance, within six months of the
City's fiscal year end.
if a federal cognizant audit agency has been assigned for the City,
copies of required audit reports will be filed with that agency J
also.
-12-
r
A
Recipients of more than $100,000 in federal assistance
must also submit one copy of the audit report within 30 days after
issuance to the central clearinghouse. Audit reports should be sent
to:
Bureau of Census
Data Preparation Division
1201 East loth Street
Jeffersonville, Indiana 47132
Attn: Single Audit Clearinghouse
C. The City will treat all public, private or cooperatively
owned utility facilities which directly or indirectly serve, the
public and which occupy highway rights of way in conformance with
the attached "A Policy for the Accommodation of Utilities on Highway
Rights of Way" as approved on April 5, 1988 by the United States
Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration,
Minnesota Division.
-VIII-
All references to statutes and rules shall be construed to
refer to the statutes and rules as they may be amended from year to
year.
-IX-
The Commissioner accepts this said appointment as agent of
the City and agrees to act in accordance herewith.
-13-
City of Mounds View
Mayor
Date
Attest:
City Cierk
Date
Recommended for Apprcval
Dy
nirector, Office of State Aid
Date
Approved as to Form and Execution
Special Assistant Attorney General
Date
State of Minnesota
Commissioner of Transportation
Date
(Seal)
E
-14-
RESOLUTION No. 2575
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
( COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CLERK -ADMINISTRATOR
TO ENTER INTO AN AGENCY AGREEMENT WITH THE
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
WHEREAS, in accordance with Minnesota Statute 161.36, the
City of Mounds View desires the Commissioner of Transportation to
act as its agent in accepting federal aid for road and bridge
construction, and in contracting for construction, improvement or
maintenance of roads or bridges financed in whole or part with
federal monies.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that pursuant to Section
161.36, Subdivisions 1 through 6, Minnesota Statutes, the
Commissioner of Transportation be appointed as agent of the City
of Mounds View to let as its agent, contracts for the
construction of local roads and bridges, and the mayor and the
Clerk -Administrator are hereby authorized and directed for and on
behalf of the City of Mounds View to execute and enter into a
contract with the Commissioner of Transportation prescribing the
terms and conditions of such contracts in the form as set forth
and contained in "Minnesota Department of Transportation Agency
n
Agreemet" a copy of which aid agreement was before the City
Council, assuming on behalf of the City all of the obligations
therein contained.
Adopted this llth day of December, 1969.
ATTEST:
(SEAL)
Mayor
Clerk -Administrator
� RESOLUTION N0. 2569
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING POLICY ON THE PLACEMENT
OF PLANNING SIGNS
WHEREAS, the City Council during recent public
hearings on development proposals has received complaints
from residents about the timing and receipt of public
notification; and
WHEREAS, the City Council recognizes that even with
its best efforts, publicity regarding development proposals
does not always reach all interested parties; and
WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to do its utmost to
let interested residents know that a specific piece of
property is being considered for development.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council
_ of the City of Mounds View establishes the following policy
for the placement of planning signs.
1. The City shall purchase and make available
2 foot x 4 foot signs bearing the following
message,
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
PLANNING ACTION CONSIDERED
ON THIS PROPERTY
FOR INFORMATION CALL 784-3055
2. Upon making application to the City for the
approval of any planning actions required under
Chapter 40 of the Municipal Code, the property
owner shall obtain planning sign(s) and posts
from the City and place them in a clearly visible
location on all frontages abutting a public
right-of-way and no less than one per 500 feet of
frontage.
3. The property owner shall provide the City with a
$25.0sign to
the si0gneandlposots arehreturned bin an unded undamaged
n
undamaged
condition.
4. The property owner shall place the signs as
required within 10 working days of making
application for planning action or all planning
action dates shall be rescheduled to allow
adequate public notification.
RESOLUTION NO. 2569
PAGE TWO OF TWO
ATTEST:
(SEAL)
5. The City will place the sign(s) upon written
request of the property owner and agreement to
compensate the City at overtime rates plus
materials.
Adopted this day of 1 1990.
Mayor
Clerk -Administrator
3
G
eo� RESOLUTION NO. 2574
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW POLICY
REGARDING PETITIONS FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS
WHEREAS, the Mounds View City Council anticipates
receiving petitions for public improvements in the City; and
WHEREAS, the Mounds View City Council hereby sets policy
regarding the acceptance of petitions; and
WHEREAS, the Mounds View City Council states that the
petitioner shall submit all applicable information including, but
not Limited to, the demonstrated need for the improvements, the
proposed location and lay out (sketch plans) oI Lhe improvements
in accordance with applicable City ordinances, and the signatures
of one hundred percent (100%) of the directly affected and
benefitting properties relating to the public improvements at the
same time the petition is submitted.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Mounds View hereby sets policy regarding acceptance
of petitions for public improvements pursuant to direction found
above.
ATTEST:
(SEAL)
hJ
Adopted this llth day of December, 1989.
Mayor
Clerk -Administrator
• MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: City Planner Hren
DATE: December 7, 1989
SUBJECT: CERTIFICATE
CATE OF
FDOCCUPANCy FOR DYNAMIC DESIGNERS,
7660
Mr. Jim Cepress has requested a Certificate of occupancy for his
All inspections
have
Bubeen
ldingmade
fonrplex at 7660 Woodlawn Drive, with all applicable
and the building is in comp
Codes.
Mr. Cepress had applied for a variance from the concrete cur
The Planning Commission addressedthis
standard in order to allow for the asphalt curbing that as
already been instgular meeting on Wednesday, December 6,
1989,
issue at their request.
and denied the req for occupancy.
The building is now completed and ready
ate of replacing the curbing
Please find attached a cost estim
to be done in the spring*
which would have
MMH/BAC
l�
MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Troy Gamble, Engineering Aide
DATE: December 7, 1989
SUBJECT: CONCRETE CURB COST FOR 7660 WOODLAWN DRIVE,
DYNAMIC DESIGNERS
Using the average successful bid (MnDOT, 1987) for B6-18 concrete
curbing (B6-12 not available), the cost of such curb and gutter
for the property at 7660 Woodlawn Drive is estimated at
approximately $930 for materials and labor. The City has the
option to require an additional security of 150% of the estimated
cost or approximately $1,400.
Again, this prime may vary depending upon who is contracted to do
the work:
Length of Curb: 165'
1987 MnDOT Average Successful Bid Price (using
B6-18 because B6-12 not available)
Cost (B6-18) per linear foot:
($5.65/ft.) x (165') _ $932
x (150%) _ $1,400
TJG/BAC
C
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
CITY COUNCIL
DECEMBER 18, 1989
7:00 P.M. - SPECIAL MEETING - PUBLIC HEARING ON 1990 BUDGET
AND PROPERTY TAX LEVY
(NOTE: Agenda session to immediately follow public hearing)
AGENDA SESSION
1. Consideration of Staff Memorandum and Ordinance No. 482
Amending the Municipal Code of Mounds View By Amending
Chapter 91, Entitled, "Animals"
2. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding TJB
Companies Sign Request and waiver of Highway 10
Moritorium District Requirements
3. Informational Presentation by Everest Development -
Mounds View Business Park Phase III
4. Presentation by Short -Elliott -Hendrickson on the Storm
Water Management and Storm Water Utility Plans
5. Continued Discussion of Possible Community Center
6. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding City Survey
Questions
7. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding FAX Machines
B. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding City Hall
Clerical Aide
9. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding Computer
Purchases
10. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding Parking
Study on 7500 - 7600 Block Greenfield Avenue
r!�
APPROVED
® PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA
Regular Meeting
November 27, 1989
Mounds View City Hall
2401 Hwy. 10, Mounds View, MN 55112
The Mounds View City Council was called to order by 1, Call to
Mayor Hankner at 7i08 PM on Monday, November 27, 1989. Order
The Pledge of Allegiance was said. 2. Pledge of
Allegiance
MEMBERS PRESENT: Councilmembers Paone, Wuori, Quick 3. Roll Call
and Mayor Hankner.
It was noted Councilmember Blanchard was absent.
ALSO PRESENT: City Attorney Karney, Clerk/Admini-
strator Pauley, Public Works Director Minetor and
City Planner Hren.
Motion/Second: Quick/Paone to approve the November q, Approval of
13, 1989 minutes as corrected. Minutes:
4 ayes 0 nays November 13,
Motion Carried
Mayor Hankner read the letters of commendation to 5. Special Order
Public Works Foreman Mike Ulrich and Maintenance of Business
worker Gary Kardell, and presented the letters to
them, thanking them for the work they do on behalf
of the City.
Police Chief Ramacher reviewed crime statistics for
the first nine months of 1989 versus 1988, which
indicate that crime is up. He reviewed the activities
of the police department. In addition to making
arrests, 70% of their time is spent in public service.
Public Works Director Minetor reviewed the activities
of the buildings, streets, garage, water and sewer
departments for the third quarter.
Park and Rec Director Saarion presented a video,
�_j giving an overview of the park and rec department
and their activities for 1989.
November 27, 1589
Mounds View City Council Page Two
Regular Meeting -------'------
---------
----------------------
Motion/Second: Paone/wuori to set a special meeting 6. Public Heari
for the eve°i°9 of December 18, 1989, at 7 PM and hold 1990 Budget'
a public hearing at that time for the 1990 budget and and Property
onvenement on Tax Levy
property tax levy, with a potential rec
Decembet 26, 1989- Motion Carried
4 ayes 0 nays
Clerk/Administrator Pauley explained the public hearing
had to be rescheduled as according to law, it cannot
be held at the same time as the school board their
county
hearings, and the school board was holding their hear
ing this evening also.
meeting and opened the 7.
Public Hearing:
Mayor Hankner closed the regular
Consideration
second public hearing at 7:42 PM.
of Rezoning
the request of the applicant to rezone
Road.
Request from
R-1 to R-2 for
Ms. Hren reviewed
his property from R-1 to R-2, at 8280 Long Lake
the policy con-
Donald Anderson
The Planning Commission has rewritten
she reviewed the criteria
Long
cerning R-2 districts, and
of this request, the Planning
Road
Road
established. After review
did meet t he requirements
it
Commission denialof the request.
denial
for rezoningandmthey recommendined
Eric Bradley, 8255Greenwood stated he is
zoning requirements
an torivep
against making the
the Planning Commission's
and he is in support of
he wants this to remain a single
denial. He added
family, suburban, non -city community.
Mr. Bradley also asked the Council . not oto allowrental
d he
or commercial property into the
if R-2 is allowed. He added
stated safety concerns
is made, the next one becomes easier,
if one exception
and so forth.
8072 Long LakeRoadd has lived
he isagainsthe
Bill Frits, the
area for 45 Years the density
rthe
He is especially concerned with
rezoning.
e
use of the property in the future.
issue and
8267 Greenwood Drive, stated he was
Warren Johnson,
against rezoning of the property.
8273Greenwood Drive, stated she is
Jan Delaney,
against rezoning of the
Scott Solem, 2573 Ardar. Avenue, stated he is
against rezoning of the property.
Weber, 2565 Ardan Avenue, stated he is against
Gary
rezoning of the property.
Mounds View City Council November 27, 1989
Regular Meeting Page Three
Harriet Nelson, 8310 Long Lake Road, stated she had
originally owned the property and when she sold it to
someone other than Mr. Anderson, she did not believe
it would be for a duplex.
Charles Nelson, 8300 Long Lake Road, stated he is
against rezoning the property.
Don Anderson, 1021 44th Avenue NE, Columbia deights,
owner of the property, explained he travels during the
winter and is concerned with security. He plans to
build. the unit and have family live in the other
section.
Mayor Hankner closed the public hearing at 7:55 and
reopened the regular meeting.
Motion/Second: Quick/Wuori to deny ordinance No.
483 for the rezoning of the property at 8280 Long
Lake Road.
4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Councilmember Wuori pointed out the property is in the
middle of a single family residential neighborhood and
it should be left as it is.
Councilmembers Paone and Quick stated they agreed with
Councilmember Wuori's comments.
Mayor Hankner added she also agreed with the comments
of the Councilmembers, and she pointed out there are
areas in the city which are zoned for R-2.
Mayor Hankner closed the regular meeting and opened
8. Public Hearing:
the next public hearing at 7:57 PM.
Consideration
of Request
Ms. Hren reviewed the request of the applicant for a
for Wetland
wetlands alteration permit. The property in question
Alteration
is located within the wetland buffer area and a
Permit for
public hearing is required by ordinance. She added
Jerry Hauck,
there are no other issues to be addressed with this
2332 Sherwood
proposal, and she does not feel there would be any
Road
impact on the wetland with this construction.
Bill Doty, 3049 Bronson Drive, questioned whether
a three season porch addition should be allowed in a
wetland buffer area.
Mayor Hankner pointed out the house was built before
�I.' the mapping was done.
Mounds view City Council
Regular Meeting November 27, 1989
----------------- Page Four
-----------------------------
Lyle Nelson, 2357 Sherwood Road, advised t:ie :otice he
received had the wrong address on it. Hd stated n
home and neighborhood.
that he feels this would be a good addition for the
Jerry Hauck, 2332 Sherwood Road, pointed
houses on both sides nf him ,_. _
he h_
opes to put on. - — ate behiout the
nd the addition
Tom Kosel, 8120 Jackson Drive, stated he is concerned
with the wetland area, but if it; .has been determined
there would be no impact on the wetland area, he would
not have a problem with this.
Mr. Hauck clarified there was no pad under the old
deck, just footings.
Mayor Hankner closed the public hearing and reopened
the regular meeting at 8:65 Pit.
Motion/Second
2564--: Quick/Panne to approve Resolution No.
pproving a wetland alteration permit for Jerry
Hauck, 2332 Sherwood Road, and waive the reading.
4 ayes 0 nays
Motion Carried
Lyle Nelson referred to an article in a recent issue 9. Residents
of the New Brighton Bulletin, concerning the final
approval given for the Hardees development. He Requests and
stated he did not agree with the comments made by
Comments From
the mayor that government is run by the people who the Floor
p, and he does not feel the Council was listen—
ing to the people of Mounds view.
Mayor Hankner explained that showing up does not
necessarily mean being in the room, but that residents
can call and write. as
otherlso Councilmembers, try to knock donhdoors ase, aslmuch as
possible.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reviewed the items on the 10. Approval of
proposed consent agenda.
Consent
Motion_ /Second: Paone/Quori to approve the consent Agenda
agenda, as presented, and waive the reading of the
resolutions.
4 ayes 0 nays
Motion Carried
Mounds View City Council
Regular Meeting
November 27, 1989
Page Five
Ms. Hren reviewed the request of the applicant for a 11. Consideration
minor subdivision at 3049 Bronson Drive. The of Resolution
Planning Commission has reviewed it and recommends No. 2565,
approval. Approving a
Minor Sub-
Motion/Second: Quick/Paone to approve Resolution division at
No. 2565, approving a minor subdivision for Willard 3049 Bronson
Doty, 3049 Bronson Drive, and waive the reading. Drive
4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Ms. Hren reviewed the request of the applicant for 12. Consideration
a minor subdivision at 2186 Bronson Drive. The of Resolution
Planning Commission has reviewed the request and No. 2566,
recommends approval to the Council. Approving a
Minor Sub -
Mr. Hall stated the cars on the property had been division at
moved out yesterday and the majority of junk on 2186 Bronson
the property has been picked up. Drive
Motion/Second: Quick/Hankner to approve Resolution
No. 2566, approving a minor subdivision for Vernon
Hall, 2186 Bronson Drive, and waive the reading.
4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Mr. Minetor reviewed his memo of November 21 to the 13. Consideration
Council concerning the street light request for 8419 of Staff Memo
Spring Lake Road. He also reviewed the criteria of Regarding
the street light policy and stated the area is well Streetlight
lit, and stated he did not feel an additional street Petition,
light should be installed. He did note, however, 8419 Spring
that the petitioner has had a high incidence of crime. Lake Road
Councilmemner Paone recommended watching the area for
a while. He noted also that many of the residents had
signed the petition.
Mayor Hankner stated she would be interested in know-
ing what the crime was.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported that history
has shown that lights do not deter crime.
Motion/Second: Quick/Paone to table action on this
until the next regular meeting on December 11, 1989.
4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
17.1
Mounds view City Council November 27, 1989
Regular Meeting Page Six
Ms. Hren reviewed
the request of the applicant for
14. ConsideratiG�
an address change.
She explained in reviewing the
of Staff Mert{
file it was noted
there was difficulty in getting
Regarding
Mr.Bayerkohler to
comply with the landscaping
7801 Sunnyside
required in 1986.
The City Forester has reviewed
Road
the situation and
agreed the required landscaping
was excessive and
suggested a revised plan, which
Mr. Bayerkohler has
installed. She also clarified
the Planning Commission
has not reviewed the revised
landscaping plan.
Final approval would be up to
the Council.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley clarified that after
discussion with Attorney Karney, this would not be
an amendment to the development agreement, and the
Council can accept the alternate landscaping plan as
being adequate.
Motion/Second: Hankner/Wuori to accept the revised
landscaping plan, according to Rick Wriskey's
suggestions.
3 ayes 1 nay Motion Carried
Councilmember Quick voted gainst the motion.
Mr. Hren advised the new sign had gone up without
removal of the old sign, which does create another
problem.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley suggested the Council
could have the first reading of the ordinance with
the understanding the second reading would not occur
until the old sign was taken down.
Mayor Hankner stated she agreed, with the addition
that the landscaping must also be to the Forester's
satisfaction.
Councilmember Wuori noted the Planning Commision
usually accepts the recommendation of the Forester
for plantings.
Councilmember Quick stated he felt by passing the
resolution, they were sending the flag up that the
City does not require compliance.
Motion/Second: Hankner/Wuori to have the first
reading of Ordinance No. 480, amending the Muni-
cipal Code of Mounds View by amending Chapter 47
entitled "House and Building Numbers", with the
condition there be no second reading until such
time as the old sign has been removed and the revised
landscaping plan has been approved by the Forester
as completed.
4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Mounds View City Council
Regular Meeting
® Councilmember Quick stated he feels people should
meet their end of the bargain.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley advised this item had
been approved on the November 13 consent agenda,
so no action was required.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reviewed the memo from
Finance Director Brager to the Council, dated
November 1, concerning the purchase of a personal
computer. The funds are available.
Motion/Second: Hankner/Paone to authorize the purchase
of a personal computer from Northgate Computer Systems
in the amount of $3,374.00 and the purchase of a laser
printer from Entre Computer Systems in the amount of
$1,049.00 for the Finance Director; to be charged to
account 100-4190-703, City Hall, Equipment.
4 ayes 0 nays
November 27, 1989
Page Seven
15. Consideration
Of MSA Computer
Hardware and
Software
16. Consideration
of Staff Memo
Regarding
Purchase of
Personal
Computer
Clerk/Administrator Pauley explained there were pur- 17
chases authorized in 1988 for which the work was not
completed until 1989, for which budget transfers must
be made at this time.
Motion/Second: Fluori/Paone to direct Staff to
prepare a resolution that would authorize budget
transfers and place it on the consent agenda for the
December 11 meeting.
4 ayes 0 nays
Mayor Hankner stated this action would be waived until 18
the public hearing, which has been rescheduled for
December 18.
Motioa/Second: Quick/Paone to table action on this
item antzl Becember 18, 1989.
4 ayes 0 nays
Mr. Minetor reviewed the request of the petitioners
for the installation of two street lights between
County Road I and Hillview, on Long Lake Road, and
recommended approval of the request.
Motion Carried
Consideration
of Staff Memo
Regarding
Budget
Transfers
Motion Carried
Consideration
of Staff Memo
Regarding 1990
Budget
Additions
Motion Carried
19. Consideration
of Staff Memo
Regarding Street
Lights on Long
Lake Road
Mounds view City Council November 27, 1989
Regular Meeting Page Eight
Motion/Second: Quick/Wuori to approve the request
Tor installation of streetlights between County Road
I and Hillview, on Long Lake Road, with the final
determination of location to be made by NSP.
4 ayes 0 nays
Motion Carried
Ms. Saarion presented samples to the
Council of
20. Consideration
recycled paper that is available for
the City news-
of Bids for
letter.
1990
Newletter
Clerk/Administrator Pauley stated it
is clearly in
Printing
the budget, and is cheaper than what
the City has
Contract
been paying for the presecic newsletter
for non -
recycled paper, and it also meets the
goals of
the Council for concern with the community
and
environment.
Motion/Second: Wuori/Hankner to accept bid #3
from Nystrom Publishing, for doing the entire
newsletter on recycled paper, with the cover
being semi -glossy, at a cost of $14,597.44.
4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Mr. Kerney reported he had met with the attorneys 21. Report of `
for Hardees and the developer and reviewed changes Attorney
suggested by both sides to the development agreement.
Mayor Hankner questioned why none of the changes
were suggested two weeks ago when they met to work
on the development agreement.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley stated the City typically
does not change a development agreement at the
request of a developer.
Ted Rose, no address given, asked if Burger King
had requested any changes at the time of their
development agreement.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley replied the attorneys
from their corporate office spent a good deal of
time reviewing it but they did agree with the
City's wording. He noted if the Council starts
making changes, all types will be requested.
Motion/Second: Panne/Wuori to authorize Attorney
Karney to bring the development agreement back to
Hardees with the only change being that proposed by
Attorney Karney in paragraph 1. _
4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Mounds view City Council
Regular Meeting
November 27, 1989
Page Nine
Ms. Hren reported that at the request of Councilmember 22. Report of
Blanchard, the status of the K Gas soil was looked Staff
into. The tanks have been removed and the fire deparat- Members
ment indicates there is some contamination of the area.
Mr. Minetor reported MnDOT has requested an informa-
tional meeting on January 8 for new Highway 10, to
make a presentation of what is proposed to be con-
structed and answer questions.
Councilmember Paone had no report.
Councilmember Wuori had no report.
Councilmember Quick commended the public works
employees who worked on Friday and had the situation
well under control concerning the water problem.
Mayor Hankner requested a special meeting be set for
December 5 to have the performance review for
Clerk/Administrator Pauley.
Motion/Second: Hankner/Quick to have a special
meeting on December 5 for the purpose of conducting
the performance review for the Clerk/Administrator.
4 ayes 0 nays
Clerk/Administrator Pauley had no report.
There being no further business before the Council,
Mayor Hankner adjourned the meeting at 9:16 PM.
23. Report of
Councilmembers:
Councilmember
Paone
Councilmember
Wuori
Councilmember
Quick
Mayor Hankner
Motion Carried
24. Report of
Clerk/
Administrator
25. Adjournment
PUBLIC HEARING ON THE 1990 BUDGET AND TOTAL AMOUNT OF
PROPERTY TAXES TO BE COLLECTED
The Council of the City of Mounds View is proposing a budget of
$2,850,852 to provide City services in 1990. This proposed budget
is an increase of 3.66 percent over the 1989 Budget. The Council
further proposes that total property taxes to be collected for 1990
be $1,391,306. These proposed property taxes are an increase of -
$2.83,290 over total property taxes collected in 1989. Of this
amount, $262,276 will replace State Aid shifted from the City to the
Mounds View School District. This results in an increase of 25.56
percent in property tax collections for the City. If State Aid had not
been shifted the increase would have been 1.89 perrent.
The budget and amount of property taxes to be collected are
proposals only. All citizens of the City of Mounds View are invited to
attend a public hearing where the Council will discuss the proposed
budget and proposed property taxes. The Council will vote to
approve or disapprove this proposed budget and the amount of
property taxes to be collected for 1990 at the hearing. Please come
and give the members of the Council your opinions on these
proposals_ PUBLIC HEARING
Date: December 18,1989
Hour: 7:05 p.m.
Place: Council Chambers
City Hall
2401 Highway 10
Mounds View, Minnesota
If additional time is needed the hearing will be reconvened on
December 26 at 7:05 p.m. in the same place.
Summaries of the City's proposed 1990 budget are available for
review at the City Hall. Persons unable to attend this hearing may
send written comments to the Council at the above address. For
II the Finance Director's office: 784-3055,
more information, ca
8 a.m. - 4:30 p.m. Monday -Friday.
MEMO TO: MAYOR AND CITY COU I 4� -
FROM: CLERK-ADMINISTRATO
DATE: DECEMBER 14, 1989
SUBJECT: PIGEON ORDINANCE
Pursuant to direction at the December 4th Agenda Session
I contacted the Metropolitan Airports Commission and a
veterinarian regarding concern voiced about pigeons
interferring with the flight paths for planes landing at the
Anoka County -Blaine Airport and the transmission of disease
by pigeons.
Attached please find a letter from Mr. Jack R. Eberlein
responding to a request by Mr. Meyer, who contacted
Mr. Eberlein prior to me, indicating that the location of
pigeons on his property in Mounds View should not pose a
problem to airport flight patterns. Also attached is a
letter from Dr.. John A. Newman, Director of Avian Health
Research, at the University of Minnesota, College of
Veterinary Medicine. Dr. Newman indicates that the keeping
of racing pigeons will not create a health hazard for the
residents of Mounds View.
Should you have any additional questions or require any
additional information, please advise.
DFP/MJS
Attachments:
0
40
W..We 04 • Sau& Pain
METROPOLITAN AIRPORTS COMMISSMINNESOTAION
P. C. BOX 11700 TWIN CITY AIRPORT ' 55111
PHONE (612) 726.1892
December 7, 1989
Mr. Vince Meyer
8380 Spring Lake Road
Mounds View, Minnesota 55112
Dear Mr. Meyer:
I am writing this letter in reply to your query as to what effect
Homing Pigeons might have on the Anoka County/Blaine Airport.
As I understand the question, you are wondering if locating
Homing pigeons at your address will have an effect on the users
of our airport, namely aircraft safety while in flight. At the
present time I can find no reason to believe that your birds will
compromise safety.
The Metropolitan Airports Commission does not encourage the
generation of bird activity in the vicinity of its airports.
However, you stated to me during our telephone conversation on
Tuesday December 5 that Homing Pigeons normally don' rfloly cabove
should
feet above phe ai airpround. th ort pattern because it
s in mind, should be of no problem to the
is located southwest of the airport and should be well clear o
low flying aircraft.
If you would like further assur, cc of the bird effects on the
I wj.:'d suggest that you contact the
Anoka County/Blaine Airport,
Federal Aviation Administration
6020 28th Avenue South
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55450
If I can be of any further assistance please feel free to contact
MS.
Sincerely,
Jam c� Eberlein
Assistant Manager, Reliever Airports
cc: Gary Schmidt, Manager
AdministratorReliever
Ccty ofAirports
Donald Pauley, Moundsviel:
tcq NtSU IA
%jo
Department of Vetennary Pathobiology
0Perna
„,
College of Veterinary Medicine
205 Vetennary Science
1971 Commonwealth Avenue
St. Paul, Minnescla 55108
December 11, 1989
Mr. Donald Pauley
2401 Highway 10
Moundsview MN 55112
Dear Hr. Pauley:
This letter is to confirm our telephone conversation stating my belief
that the racing pigeons owned by Hr Vincent Meyer do not create a human health
hazzard for the residence of Houndaview. These birds will be confined to
aloft except when released for racing. Therefore these pigeons are lose
likely to harbor and spread zoonotic microrganisms than the ferral and
migratory birds in Noundsview.
Because these pigeons are almost always confined, they will not create a
fecal contamination or soiling problem that many people associate with
pigeons.
For these reasons I see no reason for the city council not to grant Mr.
Meyer a permit to keep his racing pigeons under the conditions he has
specified.
actively,
Newman DVN PhD
Professor
Director Avian Health Research
cc: Mr. Vincent A. Meyer
ORDINANCE No. 482
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF MOUNDS VIEW BY
AMENDING CHAPTER 91, ENTITLED, "ANIMALS"
SECTION I. Chapter 91.03 of the Mounds View Municipal
Code shall be amended to read as follows:
91.03, Subdivision 1, (3) "Animal" - Any mammal of the
rodent family, including but not necessarily fowl imitedincluding but not
rabbits, hazes, and "Hamsters, and aneons (other than racin
necessarily limited to chickens, Pigeons
or carrier as re ulated b Cha ter 91.04 of this Code ,
ie
CodeSshallECTIONbelamendedtby renumbering it Mounds itto 91VOSW Municipal
SECTION III. Chapter 91 is hereby amended by adding the
following:
91.05 Racing and Carrier Pigeons
Subdivision 1. Definitions.
ORDINANCE NO. 462
PAGE TWO
(a) A site Plan showing the location and size of
the propey and the location, s—ize
a
ofof atrtructures for the housing of the
i eons.
(b) The maximum number of pigeons to be kept on
the premises at any one time.
(c) A petition signed by over 50_ percent of all
registered landowners or those occupyinq land
within SUO feet of the acplicant s property
a reein to the location of Pigeons on the
premises.
(2)
(I) The annual License fee for the kee in of pigeons
shall be established by resolution of the City
Council.
Subdivision 3. Permitted Number.
No more than 50 Pigeons may- be kept at any one time on
any permitt.d property•
Subdivision 4. Loft.
All premises on which pigeons are kept or maintainer
s sur
at
S.
ORDINANCE NO. 482
PAGE THREE
(3)
(4) All grains and foods stored for the use of the
Pigeons _shall be kept in rodent free containers.
son
SECTION IV. This ordinance shall take effect thirty
(30) days from and after the date of its publication.
Read by the City Council of the City of Mounds View on
this day of , 1989.
Read and passed by the City Council of the the City of
Mounds View on this day of , 1989.
ATTEST:
Mayor
(SEAL)
Clerk -Administrator
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
i
b.�
City Attorney
r.,:,...:..��
Memo To :Mayor and City Council Members
From :Ric Minetor, Director of Publi'c"Works/city Engineer
Date :December 13, 1989 A77
Subject :Storm Water Management Plan
Mark Lobermeir and Rocky Keehn of Short -Elliott -Hendrickson, Inc.
will give a presentation on the Storm Water Management Plan and
also discuss the concept of a Storm Water Utility at the December
18th meeting. Information will be distributed at the meeting.
L,
TO: MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL
(NOM: CLERK -ADMINISTRATOR PALLEY
DATE: NOVEMBER 13, 1969
SUBJECT: CITY SURVEY QUESTIONS
To aid in the discussion scheduled for the November 20th Agenda Session
on the referenced subject matter, staff has taken the liberty to prepare
a list of possible survey questions for your consideration. These
questions are in a very basic form and will need to be formatted by
Decision Resources for the survey.
I have broken down the questions into the four areas which I understand
to be the Council's current direction. Your direction on these
questions and any others you might wish to have asked will be forwarded
to Decision Resources for preparaticn of a draft survey document for
your consideration.
A. BASIC DEMOGRAPHIC AND GENERAL INFORMATION
1. Approximately how long have you lived in Mounds View?
2. City or State of prior residence?
' 3. Two reasons for moving to Mounds View.
4. How long do you expect to live in Mounds View?
5. How would you rate the quality of life in Mounds View?
6. Over the next 5 years, do you expect the quality of life in
Mounds View to decline, remain the same, or improve?
7. What do you like most and least about living in Mounds View?
B. How much pride do you take in Mounds View as a place to live?
9. If it were needed to maintain City services at the current
level, would you favor or oppose an increase in property taxes?
10. How do you feel about Mounds View property taxes?
11. For each dollar of property tax you pay, what percentage goes
to Mounds View?
12. Should the City preserve wetlands or allow development?
a. Would you favor or oppose a property tax increase to permit
the purchase and preservation of wetlands?
13. What is your principal source of information about the City?
14. Are you satisfied with the level of information?
15. Do you currently receive the Bulletin?
16. Do you currently receive the Focus?
17. Do you receive the City Newsletter?
a. Do you read it?
b. Do you keep it for future reference?
C. Are there any changes in the format or coverage you would
like to see?
18. Do you own or rent?
19. Any persons over 65; school age cnildren; pre-school children?
20. What is your age?
21. What is your marital status?
22. Occupation of head of household?
23. Do both spouses work?
24. Level of income?
25. Sex (by observation)
26. Would you say the City has changed for the better or worse in
recent years.
27. How much do you know about the work of the Mayor and Council?
28. Do you approve or disapprove of the job the Mayor and Council
are doing?
29. Have you or a family member had contact with City staff during
the past year?
30. How would you rate the job performance of City staff?
B. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
I. If the City were to attract more development, what kind would
you prefer?
2. What do you think of the pace of commercial and industrial
development•?
3. Are there any areas of the City where you would favor
redevelopment?
4. What type(s) of development would you most favor along Highway
10 between Co. Rd. I and Sprino Lake Park?
The Highway 10 frontage west of Co. Rd. I is almost single lot
ownership. In. order to spur quality development in this area, the
combining of lots into larger sites might be necessary. In order to be _
sure that the development meets the desires of the community, the City
may need to be involved in the purchase of these individual lots.
5. Would you support the active involvement of the City, both
financially and in the expenditure of staff time, in putting
is together large development sites?
6. Would you support the City's use of their condemnation authority
to accomplish the purchase of single parcels in order to create
larger development sites?
7. What is the location of your principal retail shopping area?
B. How much of your retail purchases do you make in Mounds View?
9. Were you aware that the City has a community land use plan
called the "Comprehensive Plan"?
10. Do you approve or disapprove of the zoning and land use
decisions made by the City?
11. Do you feel that Mounds View residents have an adequate
opportunity for input into the zoning and land use derision
making process?
12. Hcw important is it that Mounds View expands its employment
base?
13. How important is it that Mounds View provide more shopping
opportunities?
14. Should the City's first priority in attracting economic
development be increasing jobs or expanding the property tax
base?
15. Do you favor or oppose providing development incentives such as
tax breaks and zoning exceptions to attract new industrial or
commercial developments?
16. Do you tend to shop closer to where you live or where you work?
17. Should the City implement design and landscaping standards for
businesses in the community?
a. Should such standards be adopted and maintained even if some
businesses would not move to Mounds View because of the
higher cost to conform?
18, Do you think that the pace of development has been too rapid or
not fast enough?
19. Does the development across the City seem well planned for the
future of Mounds View?
C. PARKS L_"r LOPMENT
® 1. How would you rate the parks and recreation facilities in Mounds
View?
2. How do you spend your leisure time in indoor or outdoor
activities?
3. Do you participate in organized or unorganized recreation
activities? What ones?
4. Have you or a household member participated in a City sponsored
recreational program. in the past year? Please name some.
a. How do you feel about registration fees?
b. Would you pay more to help pay for higher costs?
5. How often did you use Mounds View parks and recreation
facilities in the last year?
6. Would you favor or oppose a bond issue to upgrade and complete
the park system?
7. Rate the components of each City park separately.
8. How would you rate the maintenance and upkeep of City parks?
9. Would you support an increase in parks maintenance?
10. Would you be willing to pay additional property taxes to
provide for additional parks maintenance.
11. What is the park of your choice? Why?
12. How do you use parks now?
13. What would make you use them more?
14. Should the City build a trail system to connect the parks?
15. Would you prefer a walking trail or a combination bike and
walking trail?
16. What do you think is most important to have in the parks?
17. Did you attend last September's "Festival In The Park"?
18. What do you like or dislike about the Festival?
19. How do you like the date and time of the Festival?
20. Do you use City picnic areas?
21. Do you think that more picnic areas are needed?
22. What do you think is the greatest need in Mounds View parks
right now?
23. Are you familiar with Silver View Park?
24. Do you use it and in what way?
25. What would you like to see as improvements to Silver view park?
26. Silver view Park currently has a pathway that does not extend
around one of the 3 legs of the pond. Would you prefer to leave
the trail as is or have it encompass the entire pond area?
27. Would you prefer the path be constructed of woo
asphalt?
dchips or
28• Would you Prefer the path be restricted to walking only or a
combination bike and walking path?
29, What kind of outdoor winter recreational activities do you
enjoy?
30. What kind of outdoor summer recreational activities d
enjoy?
o you
31.. What kind of indoor recreational activities do You enjoy?
32. What time is best for you
activities? to Participate in recreation
a• Evening, morning, afternoon, weekdays or weekends?
33. Do you prefer one time programs or activities meeting 6 to 10
You Or
rs
34 chub, athleticeclubf ooucaunt�ehold belong to a Private health
Y club?
a. What activities do You Participate n?
35• Approximately how many hours per week do you or members of
f household spend involved in leisure recreation
1 your
36. Compared interests.
using rMounds SVi ew Yearrec9o, are you spending more or less time
recreation facilities? Why?
37• During the next 5 years do you expect to spend more or
less time
using Mounds View recreation facilities? Why?
38. To what extent do the following considerations limit
Your
use of or participation in Mounds View facilities and
a• Amount of time Programs.
available for leisure.
b, Availability of transportation.
c. Travel distance.
d. Cost of the activity,
e. Cost of the equipment.
f• Availability of the facilities.
9• Personal health.
h• Having the skills
i. to participate.
Dislike of organized activities.
k• Safety of facilities/personal safety,
I. Availability of n of
the activity.
m. School boundaries.
eYcare,
n. Hours that facilities are open,
o. Maintenance of facilities.
P. Ease of access to facilities.
q. Availability of information about facilities and programs.
39. How likely would you use each of the listed facilities if it
were made available in Mounds View?
a. Community fitness center
b. Senior citizen center
c. Golf course
d. Wildlife preserve
e. Community band shell
f. Community-wida trail system
40. How important to you are the following improvements or additions
to th= park system?
a. Additional athletic fields
b. Improved athletic fields
c. Improved and/or enlarged trail system.
d. Park supervision and police survaillance
e. Golf course
f. Community fitness center
41. How much would you be willing to pay in additional property
taxes to support the facilties and programs listed?
a. Developing existing parks
b. Trail system
C. Golf course
e. Fitness center
e
42. What recreation programs should the City be adding or expanding? 'Is
a. Adult athletic leagues
b. After school programs
c. pre-school programs
d. Junior/senior high school programs
e. Senior citizen programs
43. Do you enjoy being a spectator or player of recreational sports?
44. What would you like to do at Silver View Park that you currently
cannot do because of lack of facilities?
E. COMMUNITY CENTER
There would be an opening narrative to this series of questions
reminding the party of the closing of Edgewood as a community center and
the possible relocation of programs and services outside if the City.
1. Do you or anyone in your household partcipate in any sponsored
or organized senior citizen programs?
2. Do you feel that daycare and latchkey needs are being met by
current providers in the City?
3. If Mounds View were to build a community center, what types
of facilities do you think are most important to include?
4. Are there any particular activities or programs and services
a community center should offer to serve your needs and those
of members of your household?
t
5. Do you favor or oppose the construction of a community renter
in Mounds View?
6. Do you favor or oppose the inclusion of the following facilities
in a community center?
a. Arts and crafts room for class and instructional programs.
b. Gymnasium
C. Sauna and whirlpool
d. Senior Citizen Center for drop -in and organized activities.
e. Teen Center for drop -in and organized activities.
f. Nursery school/daycare area
g. Large community room for banquets, parties and other rental
purposes.
h. Small community rooms for organization meetings.
7. [f a community center contained the features you most favored,
how much more likely would you be to support its construction?
Narrative relatino that no decisions have been made and that only
discussions are occurring at this time. A bond issue requiring voter
approval would be necessary to fund construction of a community cneter
with the bonds being paid for by increased property taxes. If a
community center cost $3 million it would result in an increase in
property taxes on an average $80,000 home by about $ per year for
years.
B. Would you favor or oppose that bond referendum?
9. The City might be able to identify other funds to reduce the
cost to the taxpayers. How much would you be willing to pay in
additional property taxes?
If a community center were built, the City could subsidize its operation
with tax revenue and keep user fees low or increase fees to make the
facility more self-sufficient.
10. Should the City subsidize the cost of operations to keep fees
low or increase fees?
.11. How likely would you be to use a nursery school program if
provided?
12. Should the City's priority be the building of a community
center, improvement and expansion of existing parks and
recreational facilities, or both?
`.4
MEMO TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL /
FROM: CLERK-ADMINISTRATO
DATE: DECEMBER 6, 1989
SUBJECT: FAX MACHINES
As you know the 1990 Budget contains funds for the purpose
of purchasing fax machines for the City Administrative
offices and police Department. Members of the clerical
staff from the Police Department and Administrative offices
have solicited proposals from various suppliers of far.
machines including the following brand names: Versa Link,
AT&T, Panafax, Adler and Mita. Based upon a review of the
bids and sales brochures the staff members had two of the
machines demonstrated to them and, after these demonstra-
tions, it was their determination that the City should
purchase two AT&T 3520 fax machines from Fax Tech, Inc. at
cost of 52,238 which includes shipping and handling.
Attached is a memorandum from Administrative Secretary
Michele Severson communicating that recommendation to me.
In order that these machines be ordered and delivered as
soon after the first of the year as possible, staff would
request that the Council approve the purchase of these
machines at this time for delivery on or after January 2,
1990. Your direction in this matter would be appreciated.
DFP/MJS
MEMO TO: CLERK -ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: ADMINISTRATIVE SECRETAR A
DATE: DECEMBER 4, 1989
SUBJECT: PURCHASE OF FAX MACHINES - CITY HALL AND POLICE
DEPARTMENT
The clerical staff (both police and administration) have
looked into the various brands of felt that machines" and
hadmachine
demonstrations on them•
it for the least amount of money is the AT&T 3520 This
(tnr_umencation regarding this machine attached).
machine offers automatic document feeding of a stack of
paver up to 10 and has its own paper cutter as well as being
able to store 115 fax numbers for automatic dialing.
The cost of the two machines, one for police and one for
forrtherMuraota112001fax emachine(of3$60099 afor al trade-innus a
woud total of$2198
for the two machines. This price
includeseinstallation
as
well as a seminar on how to op
erate and uthe various
features of the machine.
The other machines that staff had looked at was the Adler
Royal 915 and the Mita TC-150. The Adler is a discontinued
model and the Mita is brand new on the market.
RECOMPSENDATION: It would be the group's recommendation
oth of these machines to purchase two of
after the
AT&T 3520 fax machines.
/MJS
MEMO TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUN
FROM: CLERK-ADMINISTRAT �Y �^
DATE: DECEMBER 12, 1989
SUBJECT: CITY HALL CLERICAL AIDE
The 1990 Budget includes a part-time clerical aide position
for the Administrative Offices to assist clerical staff in
accomplishing a variety of duties including in particular,
completion of the microfilming of the City's address files
and assisting in the preparation and collation of City
Council and Planning Commission packets. The individual
filling this position would also assist Public Works Foreman
Mike Ulrich at the Public Works garage on a one to two day
per week basis in entering data for the various reports
being produced on his computer system.
In anticipation that the Council would approve this position
in the 1990 Budget I contacted the DECCA office at Irondale
High School and asked that they refer individuals to me who
might be interested in this position. The only individual
applying for the position was Lynette Morgan, a junior at
Irondale High School, currently taking office -related
courses. Lynette was interviewed by myself, Barb Collins
r . and Michele Severson. We found Lynette to be a very
pleasant individual whose skills should fit well with the
intended work program. Lynette also voiced her interest in
the position at the budgeted wage of $5.00 per hour.
Should Council adopt the 1990 Budget with this position
included, staff would recommend the hiring of Lynette Beth
Morgan at $5.00 per hour commencing January 2, 1990.
DFP/MJS
MEMO TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCI
FROM: CLERK -ADMINISTRATOR
DATE:, DECEMBER 12, 1989
SUBJECT: COMPUTER PURCHASES
As you know, the 1990 Budget provides for the purchase of
two personal computer systems to replace our aging word
Processing system currently used by Barb Collins and Michele
Severson. In anticipation that the Council will be adopting
the 1990 Budget and approving these items, staff solicited
bids from various vendors based upon a set of specifica-
tions developed with the assistance of Barb and Michele as
well as Don Brager and Ric Minetor. Attached is a spread-
sheet showing the six proposals we received. Based upon
these proposals staff participated in a demonstration of the
PONY Computer System which we found to be more than adequate
to meet our stated reeds. The PONY computer bid included a
Panasonic Laser Jet Printer which, except for the Hewlett
Packard IID Printer at a cost of $1,600 more was found to be
the best printer due to its speed and the fact that the
printer feeds from two paper trays at the same time. This
avoids the need for operators to remove one paper tray for
letterhead purposes and place a second tray with blank paper
in for second pages on correspondence. Also, trays for
8 1/2 x 14 and envelopes can be purchased for use on the
printer as well.
Barb and Michele stated a desire that these systems include
dust covers for the keyboards which are available from PONY
Computer at an additonal cost of $14.00 each and two
additional paper trays for 8 1/2 x 14 paper and envelopes at
an additional cost of $135.00. Therefore, the total PONY
Computer bid would be $5,018.35. The 1990 Budget provides
for a total cost of $7,000 for these systems, therefore, the
proposed purchase is significantly under that price. Staff
would propose that the remaining funds be used to purchase
additional software for our systems including a printer
spooler package, form designer and filler package, and the
ocnversion of our MICOM disks containing policy manuals, the
City Code, and other documents that are regularly used and
updated.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the purchase of two PONY
personal computer systems with a Panasonic Laser Jet
Printer and software at a total cost of $5,018.35 to be
charged to account number 100-4190-703.
DFP/MJS
�...
-
198'3 COMPUTER BIDS
POMY COMPUTER
ENTRE' COMPUTER
UAHL
6 HHHL
CUMpUTERLAHU
t2
IBM Model 30
it
Ryso 2109
Ilyso 2112
6YSTEMr
2u6 fK COMPATIBLE, C-12Mhs,
IBM MG&I 30
Puny
53, 752.65
54,100.77
2 .
. 20M' Hvd Oisk.
3.5- Floppy.
$3,661.U0
$2.098.80
S3,526.00
H,qh Rvs. Rnbor honitor
II
HP 1I0
HP25072
Panasl,999KSOH950
HP Sa•i vs
2,246.00
IIP Sarios
2,184.00
3.618.00
1 - Laser Jot u/ min' 512/; 6uffor
I- Lazar
OUIi
and r tuorY capability
389.00
371-H5
335.00
223.00
389.U0
275.29
os5 A
H/ SyJlan
LotusSOFTWARE:.2
LOTUS 2.2
Nor.lpvr Toct 5.0
211.00
290.00
87.on
232.30
ui systan
168.OU
u/ syston
159.00
I59.00
Dos 3.3
125.00
151.10
Be.00
Crosstalk Wl
$7,059.95
58,572.07
56.532.U0
51.855.35
56,586.00
TOTAL BIU
SPECIAL f10TE5: 2ashovta
oot tray.
trays
C: Panasonic Laear3Prin1tarthas
shot
tr.s.
For uhich
ill cost about
5550.00
Laser
tsi nc, shoot
logyea! eor.noe!!on
printer
1. tlorthyeLi dFdi,.L,r
NORTHORTE
Intel
S2,896.00
oune
1,590.00
379.00
279.00
uhystod
119.00
SF,301.00
V/eF'w /O
TO: MAYOR, CITY COUNC AND CLERK -ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: POLICE CH(E
DATE: DECEMBER 13f18/9
SUBJECT: PARKING STUDY ON 7500 - 7600 BLOCK GREENFiELD AVENUE
As you know, the 1lounds View City Counc!1 recently changed the parking
restriction on Greenfield Avenue. As of this date, the Police
Deoartment has received few complaints resulting from the change.
Attached is a summary of a parking study conducted on Greenfield
Avenue. As the report indicates, the average number of vehicles parked
on the street during the evening hours Is 25. The report also suggests
that their is ample parking available within the apartment complex.
! am suggesting that more time be given to better assess potential
oarking problems in this area. i am anticipating problems involving
snow removal, after a substantial snowfall. Other problems maybe
realized because the amount of vehicles parked on a less than normal
width roadway.
i am recommending that the Police Department monitor complaints/
incidents and report back to the Council with recommendations at a
later date.
LOO
GREENFIELD AVE. PARKING STUDY
SUMMARY
DECEMBER 9, 1989 Saturday, 2300 Hrs On Street-24
Open Parking Spaces--51
DECEMBER 10,1989 Sunday, 0200 Hrs, On Street..32
Open Parking Spaces..54
DECEMBER 10, 1989 Sunday, 2300 Hrs, On Street..22
Open Parking Spaces..60
December 11, 1989 Monday, 0200 Hrs, On Street..27
Open Parking Spaces..46
DECEMBER 11, 1989 Monday, 2300 Hrs, On Street..24
Open Parking Spaces..58
DECEMBER 12, 1989 Tuesday, 0200 Hrs, On Street.21
Open Parking Spaces..47
During the course of the study there were an average
of 25 vehicles parked on the street. The average number
of open parking spaces available at the same time with-
in the Greenfield complex was 51..
These figures do not take into account the large
unused parking area to the East of 7501 and 7511
Greenfield, This area could easily hold from 10 to
15 vehicles and alleviate the crowded conditions in
that parking area between the two buildings