HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packets - 1990/10/15CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA SESSION
OCTOBER 15, 1990
7:00 P.M.
1.
Consideration of Staff Memorandum
Regarding
Position Announcement for Clerk -Administrator
2.
Consideration of staff Memorandum
Regarding Trunk
Highway 10 Zoning Moratorium
3.
Consideration of Staff Memorandum
Regarding Daryl
Madison (to be provided Monday evening)
4.
Continued Discussion of 1991 Proposed Budget
5.
Discusson On Date for Storm Water
Management Utility
Meeting
6.
Consideration of Staff Memorandum
and Resolution
Submitted by Russell Pahl, 7940 Greenfield
7.
Consideration of Staff Memorandum
Regarding Office
Hours
B.
Consideration of Staff Memorandum
Regarding Land
Acquisition for Groveland Park
9.
Consideration of Staff Memorandum
Regarding Letter From
Spring Lake Park City Council
10.
Consideration of Staff Memorandum
Regarding Security
Lighting at Groveland Park
11.
Consideration of Staff Memorandum
Regarding
Administrative Offenses
12.
Consideration of Staff Memorandum
Regarding Amending
Resolution No. 3056 Establishing a
Uniform Schedule of
Fees and Charges
AGENDA
PAGE TWO
OCTOBER 16, 1990
13. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding Video Tape
Policy - City Council Meetings
ub,nrn . i .
Memo To :Mayor and Council Members
From :Ric Minetor, Acting Clerk -
A
d
ministrator
Date :October 11, 1990 �
Subject :position Announcement for Clerk -Administrator
Jim Brimeyer from Sathe and Associates will be at the agenda
session on October 15th to review a position announcement and
discuss any concerns you may have. Jim will also be contacting
you individually in the near future to discuss your concerns and
desires for the type of person needed to fill this position.
FIA
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Planning Technician Harrington'�(�
DATE: October 11, 1990
SUBJECT: HIGHWAY 10 MORATORIUM
The City of Mounds View passed an interim ordinance
establishing a moratorium on development in a designated
district within the City which commenced on April 24, 1989.
This moratorium was to last one year. The primary purpose of
the interim ordinance was to allow the City sufficient time to
complete its planning process and determine what changes, if
any, needed to be made to the Comprehensive Plan. However,
the end of the one-year period, it was determined that an
extension to the moratorium would be necessary. Therefore,
the ordinance was extended six months, commencing April 24,
1990. This brings us to the present and the need to address
the issue once again. The moratorium is scheduled to lapse
October 24, 1990.
Acting Clerk -Administrator Minetor and I have been reviewing
the City files in order to determine what action, if any,
should be taken on the ordinance. Our review seems to
indicate that a majority of the concern revo.'.res around the
former R-Gas gas station and the adjoining property to the
immediate west (see attached City map, Exhibit 1). With the
information available, we have formulated three possible
courses of action:
Reduce the moratorium district
immediately north of Highway 10
Road (Exhibit 2).
Allow the ordinance to lapse.
3. Extend the ordinance 90 days.
at
in
to only include the area
and west of Groveland
It should be pointed out that neither myself nor Mr. Minator
were involved in this matter from the beginning, and it is
quite possible that certain relevant facts have been over-
looked on our part. However, from our discussions and review
of the situation, these are the alternatives which appear to
exist.
Staff is asking for Council's direction on this matter.
PAH/BAB
Attachments
LL
N
N]O
ru n
s.n
.1
Q
M
NI
ew.
la
1310
]1
Isea
1]1
W
efn 6111
_
u1
131
139a
31
Y ueo ;
es.o
es.
—
11
Q
O/a
pM
si
esla 11s
J
asta ,eu1
e14
UI'
dvo r /mf
In
ewa A)a)
3312
as
at
eiC
1t
11e
lE
u1
as
er :
rr
■t.e
ua
11fe
1r.1
>
itls
ei'
un
W
U01
� Bnr
,r
uu
a 13
pa
11r1
all
-
di
11a1
r
e101
�
D-3
IL
'.
O
,, •1
1]]
ism
L
M11
NY
yL
N
U
9434
/
NM
16131.
INIMNNq
MM
Na.r0
Nlf
Naa
No]e]n
at"
■In
1n
EXHIBIT 1
0
+n
2865 AND 2301 HIGF;IIAY
10
u
—_
ow
to
��
Ir10
atff CI
¢ R�11 _ Qt0
as
—I1
M
Is+
ua
1r■r n
ml _ ulo
Bill
rr—�
5rhti Ylow
Y A-1k
LL
O
e.x
N.t
e•31
p
MU!Nn
o"NO.
W1.
M"To
Ti-
I..,
Nts
0{MMLS
em
Mob
NIT!
MISDYN_�•Nooe)n
.wI
-
aNN
EY.IiZBZT 2
nNI
nn
yl
un
J p
a w ; IY.w
OR
n
uu
PROPOSAL el
nn
N.
eel
u+e
ou N
eJ.r
a
eYel
UQ
INz
. �. Will
-••• I _ .
n
en
�))
a
ee>7
nN
wJ
uro
nm of a
wr
ul
o )!J
a !J)
nK
n))
_
: Iw N2K
uv
un
a
mi it
eru__
11
me
arc
pill
111,7
�:
�
a
Grorf�on
ern
uro
it
n
tR u •
n•I
am
-�
son
v &�
"'park•
r ! u
i
a
In?MI
y
M
N:la
• _
v �
-
�
PF
Z
- .
rib
w
/tn
SM
tIEll
�
+
t no
nrT
�
w~
exit
MM
NTTr
u
uo!
1!
.w^.
G C
eIK
NIL
Nnr
'K)'w .."
1
ry -
11J
PK
Nits
'Iw
.
C
-
uK
u •1
e14
Bill
MIS
9135
n.c
uY
/IrT
silo
so
awl
Noe.
JIM
� : a. 3
a
c
K" :
No..
.on
3
. So
em1
e.Is
Non
sm
C
solo�)
a
Wn
sm!
Da0
K!!
a
qK
No.1
K[:
Kn
Nor1
soft
NOR •
�'
ewTT
YJtt
Z
/OTe
` e001
Co TT
,31
n
nil
nK
nTT
TKI
n
.alvR.
•o.o
_
rNN
rNM
A
w
RK
-
nil
nu.
TNe
TNT
TNK
]� tir�ry R
7117
TN)
rn.
IN
TOI
MI
1wc
IM
o
TN>
TIM
nc
M
i
TQo
Rle
TM
11To�
C
,o,
�.r
TJ!
TrTo
Tr.S
TM
B-2
Trn
`
$,/err Ylow
a' B-2
MEMORANDUM
Memo To: Mayor and Council Members
From Ric Minetor, City Engineer/Director of Public Works
j/l
/1�r r ••
Date October 12, 1990 r
Subject: Traffic volumes and origins on Red Oak Drive
Council member Quick requested clarification on the origin of
traffic on Red Oak Drive under the different scenarios and the
contribution of traffic to the airport. The future volumes
presented in the traffic study are based on a 20 year projection.
This includes full development of the Blaine Industrial Park,
Full development of the Airport according to the Airport Master
Plan, full development in Mounds View according to our
Comprehensive plan, and development of the commercial areas in
Circle Pines.
The study information was not detailed enough to present the
level of airport traffic generated by the neighborhood versus the
airport traffic from outside the area. However, estimates of Lhe
total airport traffic were available. Below are the estimates of
the 20 year projected traffic on Red Oak Drive. The "transient"
traffic is the difference between the total traffic and the local
traffic. The airport traffic is the total to the airport
regardless of the origin of the traffic.
Total
Local
Airport
Location
Traffic
Traffic
T a Li—c
With Co.
Rd.
J connection
500
175
South
of
Co. Rd. J
2400
3300
1100
175
North
of
Hillview
Without
Co.
Rd. J connection
0
South
of
Co. Rd. J
200
200
1200
125
North
of
Hillview
2000
MEMO TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL ^l�Ij
FROM: ADMINISTRATION SECRETARY/DEPUTY CLER & RSON
DATE: OCTOBER 11, 1990 /
SUBJECT: PROPOSED RESOLUTION - CIVILIAN POLICE DEPARMENT
REVIEW BOARD
Please find attached a proposed resolution for consideration
from Russell Pahl, 7940 Greenfield Avenue, a resident of the
City of Mounds View. This proposed resolution was on the
March 12, 1990 agenda at which time Mr. Pahl was not able to
attend the meeting; the item was rescheduled and Mr. Pahl was
not available for that meeting either so the issue was tabled
and placed in a follow-up file with a date to come before an
agenda session at this time.
/mjs
MEMO TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL ��,II//II��
FROM: ADMINISTRATION SECRETARY/DEPUTY CLERIyr Ei7ERSON
DATE: OCTOBER 11, 1990 //''
SUBJECT: PROPOSED RESOLUTION — CIVILIAN POLICE DEPARMENT
REVIEW BOARD
Please find attached a proposed resolution for consideration
from Russell Pahl, 7940 Greenfield Avenue, a resident of the
City of Mounds View. This proposed resolution was on the
March 12, 1990 agenda at which time Mr, Pahl was not able to
attend the meeting; the item was rescheduled and Mr. Pahl was
not available for that meeting either so the issue was tabled
and placed in a follow-up file with a date to come before an
agenda session at this time.
/mjs
d
A RESOLUTION FOR CONSIDERATION
TO THE MOUNDS VIEW CITY COUNCIL
Submited by Rusoell 2ahl of 7940 Greenfield Av. Hounds View.
on this /.I, Day of March 1990.
A resolution to set up and put in motion a civilian police dep-
artment review board.
Whereas: There is no one, other then the police, that the citizens
can make a complaint to.
Whereas: The citizens mating any complaint about any one officer
or officer's on the police department has no one other then the
same police department too complain to.
Whereas: The police department as it is now, police the police, with
out any one -1,31owi.ng other then t:ie police chat really was looked into,
and/or if every thing was looked intc as to any and all complaints
registered.
Whereas: This civilian reviara boars shall be *fade up with no nay-
"nt in wa:yes, ^nashall be free Of any end ?ii 7olit4c4,^O, ^S1d J£
y and all ciT.y, county, or state employes.
Whereas: This civilian revievi board being free from any and all
special inter•:st Jrnuos, can be imvartial to all concerned.
q
MEMORANDUM
Memo To :Mayor and Council Members
From :Ric Minetor, Acting Clerk -Administrator
Date :October 10, 1990
Subject :Office Hours
I have met with the City Hall staff (not including the Police
Department) regarding office hours. As you may recall, the
current office hours are not in conformance with federal fair
labor law. We currently schedule an employee for 9 hour days
Monday through Thursday, and 8 hours every other .Friday. This
results in one week of 44 hours and one week of 36 hours. Fair
labor law requires over time or compensatory time at 1.5 times
the hours worked in excess of 40 hours each week. The following
alternatives were discussed with the employees.
The employees preferred a schedule of 9 hours a day, Monday
through Thursday and 8 hours on Friday; the second week would be
8.5 hours a day, Monday through Thursday with Friday off. This
would be 44 hours one week and 34 hours the following week. The
compensatory time would be 2 hours for the first week. The total
hours for the pay period would therefore be 78 work hours and 2
premium hours.
The sei:ullil choice Gf ui2 u
employees was a schedule of 8 hours
Monday through Friday one week and 10 hours Monday through
Thursday the following week. This wouldallow every other Friday
off and also achieve 80 hours per pay period
Other possible schedules were discussed, but not supported by
the staff affected. These other options include:
A) The current schedule for Monday through Thursday, but
half days on Friday. This would require closing City
Hall at noon on Friday, this was not popular with the
staff as they felt residents would not accept these
hours.
B) Work schedules of 10 hours per day, 4 days per week.
This would either require closing City Hall on Friday
or having half the staff work Monday -Thursday and the
other half work Tuesday -Friday. Having half the staff 2
out of 5 days does not provide adequate coverage.
C) The final schedule Discussed was returning to 8 hour
days. The staff did .;ot like this option as they enjoy
having every other Friday off. They also like the
additional time each day with fewer interruptions, they
feel this improves their productivity. They also feel
that returning to 8 hour days would not benefit the
residents; who seem to like the ability to come in
early, or on their way home from work.
I recommend that the Council authorize the staff two week work
hour days Monday through
schedules that have employees working
Thursday and 8 hours on Friday one week; and 8.5 hour daysMonday
through Thursday the following week. This would be set up similar
to the current work schedule, half the employees would have each
Friday off.
MEMO TO: MAYOR AND COUNCILMEMBERS
FROM: MARY SAARION, DIRECTOR
PARKS, RECREATION & FORESTRY
DATE: OCTOBER 10, 1990
SUBJECT: LAND ACQUISITION FOR GROVELAND PARK
I received a telephone call from Mr. Jack Newton, son of Otas
Newton, former Forestry Assistant for the City of Mounds View.
Mr. Otas Newton was the person who donated land along the north
boundary of Groveland Park to the City of Mounds View. Mr. and
Mrs. Newton have passed away. Their son Jack called to inform
the City that the Newton family wishes to sell the land. Because
of their parent's interest in the parks, the family wishes to
first offer sale of the three parcels of land to the City of
Mounds View. Parcels A and B together provides access on both
Groveland Road and Fairchild Avenue. Parcel C is located north
of parcel B and is a wooded lot. The attached maps show the
property along with size and acreage.
Mr. Newton has indicated that the family is very flexible
and would be agreeable to selling the parcels separately or in a
group of two or all together. I asked him for a ballpark off-
the-cuff idea on price and he said that an offer was formerly
made for parcel C for $34,000. He suggested that parcel A would
be comparable in worth. Parcel B includes the house and large
garage and Mr. Newton suggested $80,000 for a price. Mr. Newton
wanted to be sure that these prices were understood to be a guess
on his part. He indicated that an appraiser being requested to
perform a professional appraisal on the property.
I informed Mr. Newton that I would present this information
to the council at the next agenda session on October 15, 1990.
At this time the Council can discuss whether or not to pursue
the possibilities of land acquisition. I informed Mr. Newton
that I would notify him of the Council's feedback on October 16
so that the family can pursue the sale of the property with the
City or other parties.
GATEWAY
D
a
-�1446
ci q of VO4njg Vew
RAMSEY COUNTY. MINNESOTA
2e01 HIGHWAY 10
MOUNDS VIEW. MINN. 55112
78t•0055
FAX: 7860482
I �rorc�
\ U z6ae- I
2 T0-r/-\L t7APK 409"e E = 5-0'4-.26
TofAt A(eC- GIE r1F K A/ JISI lON
y3+r7.gy+3.a�=c��.26 ace)
pnnirdon ecycledpapet
v.,_/ )..
30 ,� II.G T51
75 12 1 (43) ' 1 0 .44 oC 4 oco "e. i ; W 6uaj a oao (.
1 '
—1 r..IIm_ L2i•8c9.4.1i ° (r7734))II �p 23 (44)(90) 1'1 0 •84a. �—'O•I �t4u
Y. . °°(4k, 5 �(9)°
(45)i (34)izTIs) 47° c ((. B°10 -38I 225 04— j•45o)
71
2.
.(6)a
05
o n (4)
(96) o
(74) 9 4 I
(. [L3L.5
r o 0J I {
DGp 91 °i 1 3 � �� 1 3 (7)
l3.4L I ) i• 4 (71)8 / 5(47) �' �33) Q- o_° 3 (7) "1 is .n
o9p I 0 (Z) ♦ 2531 Ip
I 8e s - (7°)7 6 (48) I ' 1 Qv
°.
.10 ID.10 _ - i `J .L� I 210 C ;^1173 ($)
`J.de 150 35oc. 42.1 7O r ♦2430) _ Z.
(9a)IoOQ' r �G9) 4z 1- (49) aL 1! I(32) (30) 5(y); x36•d• ,52oa.
z4p V z` ' ,o"+ 3 4 no a 3 !
9 ^ o .°t. a 2 .39 °t. I (31� VE N 6l'0) 6°5) yeas - z
c �9oc) 13Z � .'•�, 511 ,i n)c i •/(zg) 1 1 P' Z106 0 0
i-i11 IoJ Laovc,cco Lsw1101)
c✓r 10
GB(94`Y
ilt 1r
r .aao.o.(LLj ■i I .yF(sx) " j025) �t`..,i J0 RINDAHL A
—�-- —
-I 7 �95) 79c ♦oat 1 ' 13 (2cj_ (27� j 8�12)°s) 0 1
I s I o 65 zo
`— —_ 5 3 E2 A ° H 513 hh N
bb°e
6(96) m i7l 4i .3i •° 200 '!. 14 9 (13) a, d
- .3Go.c.(b (54 (z4) b
�44`// z51T I Isl c! ,so 3a • (z°zs) y -•41�
gel zlo. laa11
((.3
a3 a .Scot. )43 I 1 (Z3)10 I(IV
L� !DI I ,•Ox da I a••LL .54 n'O .lpoo.
9 �� (`p4) 210 o I 10 9 l'� 2 0' no 17 (13.
—� \ (9B) I.IIot. ��° , (22) �-T ( ) "
1 t 1DD 23 -- -
0 r zn. •i21 co ' Gj p
18041
I:O B (99) (lO 6L D 1� C21) B 3 (1b) 14) los los
�R S OP(D AD , ' ' 0 1 7 (leo� ZL 0/20)7 q (17) c.` � (,
J 77o J uW4)'
6 (ror)Z 4L°s 42 B1(zl9 no (00)
35 10 LIl.4' F �L °, r .43w13So(lot)2 CQ ° OUTLOTW 'as �Q
L U4. 0 (109) V• p \
- T Js,c p 31 A 2 , 68
(43) /0J2 to 4 VILLAGE OF MOUNDS VIEK'. S (_3� _�----x
21L4a x11•40
/4J.20 90 S rD (1)Nb
:(.3Z)
m00 5 p0 p
.1 u"! c
�6) 7o
ac otl .i ,�Lu- -7• (2143.xe o P5(4I 3 )I30)5) (51)6-(0)mae�59b(31) 9L%•
o
i70 d ,20 /e6 MwY.CLML °.. ¢Loe16 c Q
a5e.� o u.
°ARDEN °ARDEN
i
"I 84 31 3 3i uJ.L es d �3S ✓
,4j E(G�ARDNER 2N ADD (2) o (3) ; C4) (�)� (�� s(38) Q0 a
I Ryr _
a>r ly I` ',ayl° I• 4 40)3 1 (39) (78� s GALE (37) (36) (3
AD ITID 6 51 4 3
— �4— �c;f-Jjti 'o- •ri is ( ) c, Inz ° Bs ns s' O� s) ;
37 451.E
99) LSC oc. __ _--.113_ wp nn.a Hit t•n.
MEMO TO: MAYOR AND COUNCILMEMBERS
FROM: MARY SAARION, DIRECTOR
PARKS, RECREATION AND FORESTRY
DATE: OCTOBER 2, 1990
SUBJECT: LETTER FROM SPRING LAKE PARK CITY COUNCIL
On Monday, October 1, 1 received the attached letter from Jay McCluskey, Director of
Parks and Recreation for the City of Spring Lake Park.
The letter indicates that the Spring Lake Park City Council wishes the Mounds View
City Council to consider assuming park maintenance responsibilities for Lakeside Park.
When the initial agreement regarding the responsibilities for operation of Lakeside
Park was made, duties were divided according to available resources. Since thr City
of Mounds View already administers an aquatics program and Spring Lake Pa:k does
not it seemed logical that the City of Mounds View operate the beach opera:ion.
Likewise, the City of Spring Lake Park has a Parks Department which is in close
proximity to Lakeside Park and since the majority of the parkland lies in Spring Lake
Park, it seemed logical that Spring Lake Park assume the maintenance operations of
the park.
The Council may wish to consider these options:
1. Accept the maintenance responsibility. Mike Ulrich estimates that the
maintenance of Lakeside Park requires approximately 12 hours of work/week
for basic maintenance duties, excluding projects and unforeseen needs.
2. Continue with the operations of Lakeside Park as in the past with the City of
Mounds View assuming the administration of the beach operations and the City
of Spring Lake Park assuming the maintenance operations of the park. Each
City would continue to fund half of the operations cost ($11,500/city in 1990).
3. Consider giving Lakeside Park to the Ci-y of Spring Lake Park to assume the
full operation.
Council's direction is requested regarding this issue.
MS/SL
Attachment
J
City of Spring Lake Park
Parks & Recreation Department
1301 Eighty First Avenue Northeast
Spring Lake Park, Minnesota 55432
(612)784.6491
Mawr
Ilarl(T ells
'-ieVtember
24. 199(1
Counalrne)nh•e
lean \lawn
lohn \l. Conde
Dun MIthimcelr
Barbara Carlson
MEND
Clerk.Tnv5urer
Donald B. Iluuh
Depulp Clerk
Barbara Nelson
TO; MARY
SAAR 10111
Chir/nlndiee
Bruce Porter
FROM: 3A'I
Mcf:LUSKF'i
nuksFRanvliun
SUBJECT:
SWITCHING RESPONSIBILITIES IN THE
Diny1m
k,T.McClusAiy
OPERATION OF LAKESIDE PARK
Puhlic Rhrls
The Spring Lake Park City Council
Dineler
Chud, Rundle
has asked me to see If Mounds View
would consider switching our
rewon=_ibi lities at Lakeside Park.
Our City Council would like to have
Spring Lake Park coordinate the
admini5tration and Mounds Vier) take
o.er the maintenance.
Pleas, glee +his some thuught.
d ISCug5 it with vnUlstaff and get
bacl to me at your earliest
convenience.
bi
MEMO TO: MAYOR AND COUNCILMEMBERS
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSIONERS
FROM: MARY SAARION, DIRECTOR
PARKS, RECREATION AND FORESTRY
DATE: OCTOBER 2, 1990
SUBJECT: UPDATE ON SILVER VIEW PARK BRUSH CLEARING
Last Saturday, September 28, 1990, Forester Rick Wriskey, Public Works
employee Tim Pittman and I met with residents of the Silver Lake Woods
Homeowners Association for a "brush clearing" along the Silver View Park
pathway.
Initially, Five people met us at the Long Lake Road park access. We
moved westward as Rick indicated areas which could be cleared and
identified plant species that should be left alone. Over the course of the
three hours, three more people joined the group. Five loads of brush
were dumped that Saturday morning. The remaining brush was loaded
and dumped on the following Monday by Public Works. Over nine
additional loads were dumped before noon on Monday.
MS/SL
1 i i
MEMO TO: MAYOR AND COUNCILMEMBERS
FROM: JERRY SKELLY, JR. *-
CABLE TV TECHNICIAN
DATE: OCTOBER 3, 1990
SUBJECT: REFERENCES FOR NEW VIEW CONSTRUCTION, INC.
I called four references of New View Construction, Inc. All four were
good references regarding the workmanship and integrity of New View
Construction, Inc.
New View Construction, Inc. is bonded and will become licensed in the
City of Mounds View before commencing work on the project.
RECOMMENDATION: To approve New View Construction, Inc. for the
construction of City Hall cable TV control room at the low bid of
$3,470.00 to be funded with Cable TV Fund monies.
JS/SL
Li.6m /D
MEMO TO: MAYOR AND COUNCILMEMBERS
FROM: MARY SAARION, DIRECTOR
PARKS, RECREATION & FORESTRY
DATE: OCTOBER 9, 1990
SUBJECT: SECURITY LIGHTING AT GROVELAND PARK
Councilmember Quick requested security lighting at Groveland Park
in the general vacinity of the picnic tables, amongst the black
locust trees. Neighbors had complained that youth would
congregate there after curfew hours. I have contacted three
companies for estimates for lighting the area. Each company
provided a different option, however, all three companies agreed
that the best option for the city is as explained in #1•
1. An NSP lightpole already exists on Fairchild Avenue and has
direct line to the picnic area. There are no trees to block any
light that would be directed to the area. NSP estimates that
having two directional 250 watt lights on the pole, shining in
the direction of the picnic area would provide more than adequate
light for security reasons. The cost would a monthly charge of
$14.00 for electricity. The light would be on a photo -cell.
This is the least expensive option and would provide excellent
security lighting. The lighting would be directed towards the
park and therefore would not be a nuisence light shining in
anyone's house.
2. Keller Electic Co. provided an estimate for placing a pole
and setting a lamp to light the area. The power would come from
the building and would require trenching around the tot lot to
the picnic area. The electrician did not recommend an overhead
wire because of the many trees and branches and because of the
ttiotaometalapole. HThercost iscosts
$2,100for
withusing
metal pole and wooden
and
and $1,900
for a wooden pole.
3. Bacon Electric provided a cost for placing a lamp on the
existing security light pole which is located between the
building and the totlot. A security light already xistsa n this
pole for the totlot area. It wasDick'sthisgpole shining towards
directional 1000 watt lamp be placed
the picnic area. This, too would provide more than adequate
light. However, the light from this source would shine towards
the homes on Fairchild. This may or may not be a problem. The
cost of this work would be $600.00. Dick indicated that he would
not bid on the trenching of underground wire on this project
because it is too difficult to work amongst all the trees. Also,
as not
ecom
ofca'lntheatrees ended because
hand at abecause eit would ad wire wgo overr
mtotlot area.
I talked with Ron Schmitz, Groveland Park Foundation President,
and explained the options. Ron likes option #1 because it is
least expensive. The light would shine away from the homes on
Fairchild. Also, the lamps would be the property of NSP and
therefore the City would not have the obligation of repair or
replacement if broken. The monthly electrical chas would be
the only cost. The light would be more than adequate.
Groveland Park Foundaticn funds remain at just a couple hundred
dollars.
Staff requests council's direction. Since the securiandlighting
is not a budgeted item, a choice of lightingoptions
must be determined.
MEMO TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ADMINISTRATIVE SECRETARY MICHELE SEVERSON
DATE: OCTOBER 11, 1990
SUBJECT: ADMINISTRATIVE OFFENSES
After checking the City's inventory of Administrative Offense
books it was decided that it was time to have them printed as
our stock is very low. Before going to print, I discussed the
Administrative Offense form and contents with Police Chief
Ramacher. Chief Hamacher suggested that the City should
adjust the fee schedule to conform to the County's. Attached
you will find Resolution No. 3097 amends Resolution No. 2218
and reflects those suggested changes.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of Resolution No. 3097 Amending
Resolution No. 2218 Establishing Penalties for Administrative
Offenses. The printing of these forms will be approximately
$3,500 - $4,000. This amount would be taken out of the
Contingency Fund.
/mjs
RESOLUTION NO. 3097
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 2218 ESTABLISHING
PENALTIES FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFENSES
WHEREAS, the Mounds View City Council adopted Ordinance
No. 393 on June 24, 1985 establishing Chapter 400 of the
Municipal Code entitled, "Administrative Offenses", and
WHEREAS, Chapter 400 provides that penalties be imposed
for violations of scheduled administrative offenses according
to a schedule established by resolution of the City Council,
and
WHEREAS, Resolution No. 2218 amended Resoution No. 1900
which established penalties for administrative offenses was
adopted July 27, 1987, and
WHEREAS, it has come to the attention of the City that
certain offenses need to be amended to accurately reflect the
City's codes and State Law.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Mounds View amends the penalty schedule for
violations of the Administrative Offense Code of the City of
Mounds View established by Resolution No. 1900 and amended by
Resolution No. 2218 as follows:
Initial
Offense Penalty Late Charge/Week
1.Junk Vehicle (80)
$
25.00
$
5.00
2. Blocking Fire Hydrant
$
25.00
$
5.00
3. Fire Lane
$
25.00
$
5.00
4. Handicap Parking
$
50.00
$
5.00
5. Keys In Vehicle
(unattended)
$
10.00
$
5.00
6. Occupied Vehicle
(pets or childron)
$
25.00
$
5.00
7. Within Thirty Feet
$
10.00
$
5.00
of Stop Sign
8. Blocking Mailbox
$
10.00
$
5.00
9. Other (Specify)
Expired license,
wrong tabs, etc.)
$
10.00
$
5.00
-2-
10.
Signs (39)
$100.00
$100.00
$
$
5.00
5.00
11.
Zoniny (40)
}3
l
n+nn n
zr.--+va'n'
12.
n i �
Load Limits (80.03)
$100.00
$100.00
$
$
5.00
5.00
1s.
Public Nuisance (90)
$100.00
14.
15.
Animals (91)
Housing Code (93)
$
$
5.00
16.
Garbage Illegal Dumping
$ 25.00
5.00
$-
17.
1( 04)
Regulated Business
$100.00
$
5.00
Activities (105-116)
$ 25.00
$
5.00
18.
Snowmobiles (202)
$ 25.00
$
5.00
19.
20.
Trespass
Building and Fire Codes
$100.00
$
5.00
(58-63)
$ 25.00
21.
22.
Loitering
Loud - Parties/Noise
$-� 50.00
$
5.00
23.
Streets & Driveways (44)
$100.00
$100.00
$
$
5.00
5.00
24.
Wetlands (48)
$100.00
$
5.00
2 5.
2.
Fireworks
Beer/Alcohol in Public
$ 25.00
$
5.00
27.
Junk and Debris (90)
$ 25.00
$ 25.00
$
$
5.00
5.00
28.
Truck Parking (81)
$ 25.00
29.
30.
House Numbers (47)
Snowbirds
$ 00 25.00
$
5.00
31.
Seat Belts
1$ 0.00
2$ 5.00
5.00
�-
S 5.00
32.
Park Ordinance
Adopted this 22 day of October, 1990.
ATTEST:
MAYOR
(SEAL)
CLERK -ADMINISTRATOR
I�� 0
MEMO TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ADMINISTRATION SECRETARY/DEPUTY CLERK SON
DATE: OCTOBER 11, 1990
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION NO. 3098 AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 3056
Please find attached a Resolution No. 3098 Amending Resolution
No. 3056 Establishing a Uniform Schedule of Fees and Charges.
Resolution No. 3056 was adopted by the City Council on August
27, 1990. The resolution was passed on to staff so they could
begin to adjust their records for the January 1, 1991
effective date. It was noted by staff that the resolution
contained some typographical errors as well as ommissions and
some areas needed clarification.
Resolution No. 3098 corrects those discrepancies.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends Council Approve Resolution No. 3098 which
amends Resolution No. 3056 which established a uniform
schedule of fees and charges.
/mjs
RESOLUTION NO. 3098
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION
UNIFORM SCH SCHEDULE OF RESOLUTION
FEES ANDSCHARGESLZSHING
WHEREAS, all the fees and charges of the City of Mounds
View are listed on a uniform schedule; and
WHEREAS, in Resolution No. 3056 there were noted
discrepancies with regards to certain fees and charges; and
WHEREAS, it is the desire of the City Council to
correct these rioted discrepancies by amending the resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Mounds View hereby amends Resolution No. 3056
which established a uniform schedule of fees and charges as
follows:
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the following Uniform
Schedule of Fees and Charges shall be implemented effective
January 1, 1991.
1. Building Permits (Chapter 59)
all permits
(A) Minshall beum F$15.00he minimum fee r
unless otherwise specified.
(B) Valuation Table. The following Valuation Table
shall be used to determine fees for those permits
so indicated below and in all cases where the work
is of such a nature that the permit fees cannot be
determined from the schedule established below for
such work.
VALUATION TABLE
$1.00 to $500.00 $15.00 for the first
$501.00 to $2,000.00 $500.00 plus $2.00 for
each additional $100.00
or fraction thereof, to
and including $2,000.00
$2,001.00 to $45.00 for the first
$25,000.00 $25,000.00 plus $9.00 for
each additional $1,000.00
or fraction thereof, to
and including $25,000.00
RESOLUTION NO. 3098
PAGE TWO
$25,001.00 to
$50,000.00
$50,001.00 to
$100,000.00
$100,001.00 to
$500,000.00
$252.00 for the first
$2,000.00 Plus $9.00 for
each additional $1,000.00
or fraction thereof, to
and including $50,000.00
$414.50 for the first
$50,000-0 Plus $4.50 for
each additional $1,OOO.00
or fraction thereof, to
and including $100,000.00
$639.50 for the first
$100,000.00 plus $3.50
for each additional
$1,000.00 or fraction
thereof to and including
$500,000.00
$500,001.00 and up $21039.50 for the first
$500,000.00 plus $3.00
for each additional
$1,000.00 or fraction
thereof
(C) Plan Check Fee. When a plan is required to be
submitted by Subsection (C) of Section 301 of the
Uniform Building Code, except for residential
garages, storage buildings, decks and additions
costing less than $10,000.00 a plan review fee
equal to 65% of the building permit fee shall be
paid. When plans are incomplete or changed so as
to require additional plan checking, an additional
fee shall be paid based upon Table 3A of the
Uniform Building Code.
(0) Permit Fee Schedules. The following fee schedules
apply to the indicated section of Chapter 59.03
(Types of work requiring a permit.)
Subdivision 2. General Construction:
(1) buildings, structures, Use Valuation Table
footings
RESOLUTION NO. 3098
PAGE THREE
(2)
excavating, grading,
$20.00 plus $2.00
filling
per 1,000 square
feet or fraction
thereof over the
first 1,000 square
feet plus 2.5 times
any expense for
survey work by the
City
(3)
sidewalks, driveway,
$10.00 plus $2.00
parking lots, patio
per 1,000 square
(no surcharge)
feet or fraction
thereof over 1,000
square feet
(4)
stucco
$10.00 plus $4.00
per 1,000 square
feet or fraction
thereof over 1,000
square feet
(5)
reshingling
$10.00 plus $2.00
per 1,000 square
feet or fraction
thereof over 1,000
square feet
(6)
residing
$10.00 plus $2.00
per 1,000 square
feet or fraction
thereof over 1,000
square feet
(7)
platforms, seating
$20.00 per platform
and $15.00 per
seating unit
(8)
fences (no surcharge)
$15.00 per
installation
(9)
window insallations
$15.00 per
(residential)
installation
(10)
wrecking
$20.00 plus $2.00
per 1,000 cubic feet
or fraction thereof
over 2,000 cubic
feet
RESOLUTION NO. 3098
PAGE FOUR
(11)
raising, shoring
Use Valuation Table
(12)
moving buildings over
streets
(a) larger than 12' x
24' x 25' other
than accessory
buidling
$110.00 per building
(b) accessory building
larger than 12' x
24' 25'
$ 70.00 per building
x
(c) smaller than
12' x 24, x 25'
$ 35.00 per building
(13)
moving buildings over
land
$.3000 per building
private
Subdivision
Same as
3. Electrical work.: established in
the MN State
Board of
Electricians
March 1, 1972,
Edition of Laws
and Regulations
Licensing
Electricians
and Inspections
of Electrical
Installations
or as ammended
(E) Additional Permits Required.
1. Pipe Fitting.
(a) gas, oil piping Use Valuation
Table
(b) steam, hot water heating $25 .000 per
systems
100,000 BTU
per hour or
fraction
thereof over
200,000 BTU
per hour
RESOLUTION NO. 3098
PAGE FIVE
(c) fire extinguishing equipment 2000
(1) standpipes $. Per
standpipe
(2) sprinkler equipment $20.0f 0plu$4.00or each
ten sprinkler
heads or
fraction
thereof over
ten heads
2. Plumbing Work.
(a) plumbing fixture, devices, $15.00 plus
connections $3.00 per
fixture, device
and connection
(b) garbage grinder or $5.00 per unit
dishwasher
3. Refrigeration Work.
(a) equipment under 100,000 $15.00 plus
BTU per hour capacity $2.00 per
(12,000 BTU per ton) 10,000 BTU per
hour or
fraction
thereof over
10,000 BTU
per hour
capacity
(b) equipment over 100,000 BTU $35.00 plus
hour capacity (12,000 $2.00 per
per ton) 100,000 BTU per
hour or
fraction
thereof over
100,000 BTU per
hour capacity
4. Signs Billboards (no surcharge)
(a) signs up to 100 square feet $25.00 plus
$5.00 per 25
square feet or
RESOLUTION NO. 3098
PAGE SIX
fraction
thereof
(b)
signs 100 square feet
$50.00 plus
and over
$10.00 per 100
square feet or
fraction
thereof
(c)
signs: refacing or
$15.00 per
altering
installation
5. Heating and Ventilation Work
(a)
gas, oil burner equipment
$25.00 plus
$5.00 per
100,000 BTU per
hour or
fraction
thereof over
100,000 BTU per
hour input
(b)
gravity warm air heating
$35.00 per
installation
repair,
alteration or
extension
(c)
mechanical warm air heating
$25.00 plus
$5.00 per
100,000 BTU per
hour or
fraction
thereof over
200,000 BTU per
hour input
capacity
(d)
duct or tin work
Use Valuation
Table
(e)
ventilation systems
(1) using fans less than
$5.00 plus
100 CFM
$2.00 for each
fan
RESOLUTION NO. 3098
PAGE SEVEN
(2) using fans more than $25.00 plus
100 CFM $2.00 per 1,000
CFM or fraction
thereof over
3,000 CFM plus
$5.00 for each
fan
6. General Sheet Metal Work. Use ValuationTable
7, Incinerators.
(a) domestic portable
$25.00 per unit
incinerator
(b) commercial, industrial
$60.00 per unit
incinerator
8.
Elevators , etc.
Use Valuation
Table
9.
Installation of Mobile Homes.
$20.00 per
Installation
10.
Satellite Dishes.
$15.00 per
Installation
II. Signs
(Chapter 39)
A.
Sign Installation Permit "valuation Table" per I,
B of this Resolution.
B.
Sign Installer
$40/Year
C.
Temporary Sign
$10/21 Day Period
III. Zoning Code (Chapter 40)
A.
Temporary Mobile Home Permit
$35 + $10/Renewal
$ 50 (Non -
B.
Rezoning
Refundable) plus
$100 Deposit
C.
Variance
$ 50 (Non -
Refundable) plus
$25 Deposit
RESOLUTION NO. 3098
PAGE EIGHT
D. Conditional Use Permit
$ 50 (Non -
Refundable) plus
$50 Deposit
E. Code Appeal
$ 50 (Non -
Refundable) plus
$50 Deposit
F. Development Plan Review
$ 50 (Non -
Refundable) plus
$50 Deposit
IV.
Subdivision Code (Chapter 42)
A. Minor Subdivision
$ 75 (Non -
Refundable) plus
$25 Deposit
B. Major Subdivision
$150 (Non -
Refundable) plus
$10 per lot and
expenses, $100
Deposit
V.
Relocation of Building (Chapter 45)
Expenses of
inspection
Vi.
Wetland Alteration Permit (Chapter
48) $50 (Non -
Refundable plus
$100 Deposit
VII.
Swimming Pools
Valuation Table
per I, B of
this Resolution
VIII.
Contractor Licenses (Chapter 60)
$40/Year
IX.
Water Utility (Chapter 70)
A. Water Availability Charge
1. Residential
$200/Unit
2. Commericial/Industrial
Larger of
$800/acre or
$200/36,000
Gallons of
Water
Consumption/
Quarter
RESOLUTION NO. 3098
PAGE NINE
B.
Water Connection Permit
1. Service less than 4 inches
$ 20
2, Service 4 inches or greater
$ 40
$ 85
C.
Water Meter
D.
Non -Return of Meter Reading
$ 5
Charge
10% of Bill
E.
Late Payment
F.
Service Restoration
$ 50
G.
Corporation Shut Off & Curb Stop
Cost + $25
X.
Sewer
Utility (Chapter 71)
A.
Sewer Connection Permit
$ 20
XI.
Chapter 80)
Waiver of Load Limits (Chapter
$ 20/Trip
XII.
Animals
(Chapter 91)
A.
Dog Licenses (decreased by 50% after
one year)
1. Spayed or neutered
$ 7/2 Years
2, Unspayed or Unneutered
$13/2 Years
b.
Kennel
$ 27/Year
1. Residential
$ 44/Year
2. Commercial
XIII.
Multiple Dwelling (Chapter 93)
$5/Unit with
A.
Registration
minimum of $30/
building/year
XIV. Intoxicating Liquor (Chapter 100)
A. On -Sale without Cabaret $5,000 +
$60/l0o.sq. ft.
of public area
not to exceed
$10,000 per
year
RESOLUTION NO. 3098
PAGE TEN
B. On -Sale with Cabaret
C. On -Sale Wine
D. Off -Sale
E. Bottle Club
F. Investigation Fee
1. Single Person
2. Partnership, Corporation
or Assoc_ation
XV. Non -Intoxicating Liquor (Chapter 100)
A. On -Sale
B. Off -Sale
C. Set Ups
D. Club
XVI. Garbage and Rubbish Hauler
(Chapter 104)
XVII. Gasoline Stations (Chapter 106)
%VIII. New and Used Car Sales (Chapter 109)
XIX. Peddlers (Chapter 110)
$5,000 +
$85/100 sq. ft.
of public area
not to exceed
$10,000/Year
$750/Year
$200/Year
$330/Year
$250
$330
$1,000
$100/Year
$3;0/Year
$330/Yeagr
$55 + $5/
Vehicle/Year
$27 + $5 Per
Pump Exceeding
2/Year
$110/Year
$28 first
month, $11 each
additional
month and
$2/person when
more than one.
XX. Restaurant (Chapter 111)
A. Class A (occupancy load greater than 100)
1. Operating 16 Hours/Day or Less $275/Year
2. Operating More than 16 Hours/Day $550/Year
Day
RESOLUTION NO. 3098
PAGE TEN
KKfl
XXII.
B. Class B (Occupancy Load of 100 or less)
I. Operation 16 Hours/Day or Less
2. Operating More than 16 Hours/Day
Recuperation or Half Way House (Chapter 113)
A. Less than 10 Beds
B. 10-49 Beds
C. 50-99 Beds
D. Over 110 Beds
Amusement Devices and Centers (Chapter 114)
A. Devices
B. Centers
XXIII. Bowling Alleys (Chapter 115)
XXIV. Amusement Rides, Carnivals, and Circuses
(Chapter 116)
XXV. Street Opening Permit
XXVI. Boxing and Wrestling Permit
XXVII. Special Assessment Search
XXVIII. Photocopies
XXIX. Mailed Agendas
A. City Council
B. Planning Commission
$165/Year
$330/Year
$ 33/Year
$ 55/Year
$ 82/Year
$110/Year
$55/Year
Each
$110/Year
$15/Alley/
Year
$110 for
First Day
+ $16 for
each
additional
day
$15/ $15 +
Deposit/Sq
Ft.
$100/Event
$10
$.25/Sheet
$20/Year
$10/Year
RESOLUTION NO. 3098
PAGE ELEVEN
XXX.
Mailed Minutes
A. City Council
$40/Year
B. Planning Commission
$20/Year
XXXI.
Council Meeting Packets
A. City Council
$50/Year
B. Planning Commission
$25/Year
XXXII.
City Code Book or Comprehensive
$150
Land Use Plan
XXXIII.
Returned Check
$ 15
XXXIV.
Police Reports
$2/Page
XXXV.
Notary Public
$1
XXXVI.
Blue Prints
A. Up to 11 x 17
1. Blue Line
$ .50
2. Mylar
$1.00
B. Up to 24 x 36
1. Blue Line
$1.75
2. Mylar
$4.00
C. Larger than 24 x 36
1. Blue Line
$.30/Sq.
Ft.
2. Mylar
$.75/Sq.
Ft.
XXXVII.
New Resident List
$5.00
XXXVIII.
Community Room Rental
$5 + $70
Deposit
XXXIX.
Silver View Park Shelter Rental
$0-20 +
$100
Deposit
RESOLUTION NO. 3098
PAGE TWELVE
XXXX. City Hall Shelter Rental $0-20 or
$10 Non -
Resident
Adopted this
(SEAL)
ATTEST:
day of , 1990.
Mayor
Clerk -Administrator
Uir /3
MEMO TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: ADMINISTRATIVE SECRETARY/DEPU LERK SEVERSON
DATE: OCTOBER 11, 1190
SUBJECT: VIDEO TAPE POLICY - CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Please find attached Administrative Policy 88-2, Revision 1
regarding the video tape policy for City Council Meetings.
Staff awaits Council direction on this matter.
/mjs
ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY 88-2
REVISION NO. 1
POLICY FOR RETENTION OF CITY
COUNCIL MEETING VIDEO TAPES
This policy relates to the retention of City Council Meeting
video tapes.
1. The televised proceedings of the Mounds View
City Council meetings are presented for the
convenience and information of the residents of
Mounds View. Official actions of the City
Council are set forth in the approved Council
minutes.
2. Any individual wishing to view video tapes of City
Council meetings may do so in the following
manner:
b. The Mounds View Branch of the Ramsey County
Library will, on a 6 month trial basis, keep
City Council Meeting video tapes at the
library and make them available for persons
to come into the library and view the tape
on a VCR at the library. These tapes will
be stored at the library for 6 months. The
persons who view the tape will be logged on
index cards. The City will carry the
tapes to the library on the day following
each regular Council Meeting.
The City agreed to provide 3" x 5" filing box
and 3" x 5" index cards to the library for
monitoring purposes.
3. Should an individual request a copy of a certain
video tapes they will be charged $20.00 for
each tape.
Effective Date: