HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packets - 1987/05/11CITY COUNCIL MEETING
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
MAY 11, 1987
7:00 P.M.
A G E N D A
1. Call to Order
2. Pledge of Allegiance
3. Roll Call - Hankner, Quick, Blanchard, Wuor.i, Linke
4. 'Approval of Minutes: April 27, 1987
Regular Meeting
(Received in 5-04-87 Packet)
5. Public Hearing - 7:05 - Location of Portable Classroom
Building in a City Park
6. Residents Requests and Comments From The Floor
--------------------------------------------------------
CITI'LENS: BEFORE SPEAKING PLEASE GIVE. YOUR FULL NAME
AND ADDRESS FOR THE MINUTES
--------------------------------------------------------
7. Approval of Consent Agenda
ITEM A. Set Public Hearing for Consideration of
Conditional Use Permit Request from Amoco Oil,
2525 T. H. 10 for 7:05 p.m., May 26, 1987
ITEM B. Reschedule May 25, 1987 Council Meeting
to
May 26, 1987 Due
to Memorial
Day Holiday
ITEM C. Schedule Public
Hearings Eot
the Consideration
of Renewal of. Intoxicating
Liquor
Licenses
as
Follows:
Mermaid, Inc.
- 7:05
p.m.,
June
8,
1987
Muldoon's, Inc.
- 7:06
p.m.,
June
8,
1987
Donatelle's
- 7:07
p.m.,
June
8,
1987
Loose Ends On 10
- 7:08
p.m.,
June
8,
1987
B & R Liquor
- 7:U9
p.m.,
June
8,
1987
Budget Liquor
- 7:10
p.m.,
June
8,
1987
Simon's Liquor
- 7:11
p.m.,
June
8,
1987
Bel -Rae Ballroom
- 7:12
p.m.,
June
8,
1987
ITEM D. Adopt Resolution No. 2188 Authorizing Clerk -
Administrator Pauley to Sign the Draft Environ-
mental Impact Statement for the JLN Development
ITEM E. Set Public Hearing for Consideration of Dailey
Knolls Preliminary Plat for 7:10 p.m., May 26,
1987
AGENDA
MAY
11, 1987
PAGE TWO
r
ITEM F.
Approve Request of Northern States Power to
Place Streetlight on East Corner of 5302
Jackson Drive
ITEM G.
Adopt Resolution No. 2191 Requesting Ramsey
County to Restrict -Parking on County Road I
From 35W to Trunk Highway 10
ITEM H.
Adopt Resolution No. 2193 Approving Plans for
County Road I Public Improvements
'ITEM I.
Adopt Resolution No. 2194 Approving County Road
I Right -Of -Way Acquisition Plans
ITEM J.
Adopt Resolution No. 2195 Requesting the
Appropriation of Municipal State Aid Funds on
County Road I, Public Improvements
ITEM K.
Adopt Resolution No. 2196 Requesting the
Appropriation of Municipal State Aid funds on
County Road I, Right -Of -Way Acquisition
ITEM L.
Adopt Resolution No. 2192 Approving Just and
Correct Claims Against City Funds
ITEM M.
Licenses for Approval
General - Expires 6/30/87
Pacific Pools - Renewal
Masonry - Expires 6/30/87
Bixby Concrete a Masonry, Inc. - New
B.
Consideration
of Staff Memorandum Regarding Minor
Subdivision
Request - Ted and Pamela Lautzenheiser, 8121
Long Lake
Planning Case No. 205-87; Marvin Kelley, 2521
Sherwood
Road, Planning Case No. 206-87
9.
Consideration
of Staff Memorandum Regarding County Road
I Right -Of -Way Acquisition
10.
Report of
Attorney
11.
Report of
Councilmembers: Hankner, Quick, Blanchard,
Wuori, Links
12. Report of Administrator
13. Adjournment
�� 5 1:05 P.W..
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
NOTICE OF PUBLIC REARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Mounds View City Council
will hold a Public Hearing at 7:05 p.m. on Monday,
May 11, 1987 in the City Council Chambers at Mounds View
City Hall, 2401 highway 10,, Mounds View, MN 55112 to
receive public comment on the location of a portable
classroom building in a City park.
All interested parties are encouraged to attend and
comment on this matter.
Donald F. Pauley
Clerk -Administrator
(Bulletin: April 29, 1987)
CONSENT AGENDA
MAY 11, 1987
® The Consent Agenda is a technique designed to expedite handling of
routine and miscellaneous official business of
the
City
one mCouncil.
The entire agenda may be adopted by
the The motion for radoption
ofotion: us
lany individual Cos nondebatable uncilmembermust ,van item mcan
approval. By 9 Regular
be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed upon the
Agenda for debate.
ITEM A. Set Public (tearing for Consideration of.
Conditional Ilse Permit 'Request Amoco Oil,
2525 T. H. 10 for 7:05 p.m., Y
26, ITEM B. Mayc26, 1907aDue5tol987 MemorialrDayMilolidayto
ITEM C. ofhRenewal OfilntoxicatingoLiquorr Ee Licenses Consideration as
Follows:
Mermaid, Inc. - 7:05 p.m., .tune 8, 1987
Muldoon's, Inc. - 7:06 p.m., June 8, 1987
Donatelle's - 7:07 p.m., June 8, 1987
Loose Ends On 1t1 - 7:00 p.m., June 8, 1987
B a R Liquor - 7:09 p.m., June 8, 1987
Budget Liquor. - 7:10 p.m., June 0, 1987
Simon's Liquor - 7:11. p.m., June 8, 1987q Bel -Rae Ballroom - 7:.12 p.m., June 8, 1987
ITEM D. Adopt Resolution No. 2168 Authorizing Clerk -
Administrator. Pauley to Sign the Draft Environ-
mental Impact statement for the JLN Development
deration Of
Lay
ITEM E. Set Knolls bPreliminary plat lic Dearing for lfor i7:10 P.m-, may12G,
1987
ITEM F. Approve Request of Northern States power to
Place Streetlight on East Corner of 5302
Jackson Drive
ITEM G. Adopt Resolution No. 2191 Requesting Ramsey
County to Restr.irt'Parking on County Road I
From 35W to Trunk Highway 10
ITEM D. Adopt Resolution No. 2193 Approving Plans for
County Road I public Improvements
ITEM I. Adopt Resal"ti Acquisition Approving pCounty Road
f-Way
lans
ITEM J. Adopt Resolution No. 2195 Requesting the
Appropriation of Municipal St.at:e Aid Funds on
County Road 1, Public Improvements
1.
ITEM K. Adopt Resolution No. 2196 Requesting the
ApropCiountyrRoadcl1,��Right-ofpWnySAcquisitionnds on
CONSENT AGENDA
MAY 11, 1987
PAGE TWO
ITEM L. Adopt Resolution No. 2192 Approving Just and
Correct Claims Against City Funds
ITEM M. Licenses for Approval
General - Expires U30/87
Pacific Pools - Renewal
Masonry - Expires 6 30 87
Bixby Concrete & Masonry, Inc. - New
Nzyn T)
r,
RESOLUTION NO. 2188
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING CLERK -ADMINISTRATOR PAULEY
TO SIGN THE DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL. IMPACT STATEMENT FOR THE JLN
DEVELOPMENT
,
WHEREAS, on November 10, 1986 the Mounds View City Council
adopted Resolution No. 2126 Regarding the Scope of Environmental
Impact Statement for JLN Development; and
WHEREAS, Resolution No.2126 contains a listing of the
specific issues and alternatives to be addressed in the
Environmental Impact Statement as well as additional studies to
be undertaken for the project in the Environmental Impact
Statement; and
WHEREAS, a Draft Environmental Impact Statement has been
prepared on the JLN Development pursuant to Environmental Quality
Board rules addressing all of the issues and alternatives as well
as additional studies required by Resolution No. 2126.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the
City of Mounds View authorizes Clerk -Administrator Pauley to sign
the Draft Environmental Impact Statement on behalf of the City of
Mounds View which is the designated responsible governmental
unit for this Environmental Impact Statement.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of
Mounds View will schedule a Public Hearing of the Draft Environ-
mental Impact Statement for 7:05 p.m., May 11, 1987 to be held in
the City Hall Council Chambers of Mounds View City Hall, 2401
Highway 10, Mounds View, Minnesota, 55112.
ATTEST:
(seal)
Adopted this llth day of May, 1987.
Mayor
Clerk -Administrator
19
MEMO TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: CLERK -ADMINISTRATOR
DATE: MAY 7, 1987
SUBJECT: COUNTY ROAD I RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT 87-4
The purpose of this memorandum is to summarize the five
resolutions before you on the Consent Agenda relating to
County Road I. These resolutions are all required by the
State of Minnesota in order for the project to proceed and
for MSA funding to be made available for the project.
The first resolution, Resolution No. 2191, requests that
Ramsey County designate that there be no parking on both
sides of County Road I from Highway 10 to 35W. This is
consistent with the feasibility report filed by the County
and approved by the City.
The second and third resolutions, Resolution Nos. 2193 and
2194 approve the plans for the public improvements and the
right-of-way acquisition for this project and authorize the
Clerk -Administrator to sign those plans. The plans have
been reviewed by City Staff and by Dan Boxrud of SEH and all
of our concerns have been addressed by the engineer and the
County on the project.
The fourth and fifth resolutions, Resolution Nos. 2195 and
2196 request that MnDOT approve the use of MSA funds for
off -system improvements or right-of-way acquisition.
Essentially, these resolutions are required because the
City's MSA funds will be spent on a County State -Aid road
which is an off -system improvement and although it is
eligible, approval is required by MnDOT before the funds can
be expended.
Staff would request Council approval of call of these
resolutions in order that the project may stay within the
timelines previously established.
DFP/mjs
RESOLUTION NO. 2191
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION REQUESTING RAMSEY COUNTY TO RESTRICT
PARKING ON COUNTY ROAD I ,FROM 35W TO TRUNK HIGHWAY 10
WHEREAS, the City of Mounds View and Ramsey County have
planned the improvement of County Road I from I 35W to Trunk
Highway 10; and
WHEREAS, the Feasibility Report on the reconstruction of
County Road I from 35W to Trunk Highway 10, which was approved by
the City, recommends that no parking be allowed on either side of
the subject roadway.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Mounds View that the City requests Ramsey County prohibit
parking of motor vehicles on both sides of County Road I from I
35W to Trunk Highway 10.
Adopted this llth day of May, 1987.
ATTEST:
Mayor
(seal)
Clerk -Administrator
RESOLUTION NO. 2193
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS FOR COUNTY ROAD I
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS
WHEREAS, plans for State Aid Project 12••603-05 and MSA
Project 146-02-02 showing proposed alignments, profiles, grades
and cross sections for the reconstruction of County Road I have
been prepared and presented to the City.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Mounds View that said plans are hereby approved and the
Clerk, -Administrator is authorized to sign the plans.
Adopted this llth day of May, 1907.
ATTEST:
Mayor
(seal)
clerk-Admin�— ia— t` rotor
0
RESOLUTION MO. 2194
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION APPROVING COUNTY ROAD I RIGHT-OF-WAY
ACQUISITION PLANS
WHEREAS, the plans for State Aid Project 12-603-05 and
Municipal State Aid Project 146-02-03 showing right-of-way
acquisition for the construction of County Road I within the
limits of the City as a State Aid Project have been prepared to
the City.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Mounds View that said plans are hereby approved and the
Clerk -Administrator is aut
horized to
sign
the I e plans.
Adopted this llth day of May, 1987.
ATTEST:
Mayor
(seal)
Clerk-Admin s� trator
RESOLUTION NO. 2195
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION REQUESTING THE APPROPRIATION bF
MUNICIPAL STATE AID FUNDS ON COUNTY ROAD I,
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS
WHEREAS, it has been deemed adviseable and necessary for
the City of Mounds View to participate in the cost of the
redonstruction of County Road I within the limits of said
municipality; and
WHEREAS, said project has been approved by the Minnesota
Department of Transportation and identified in its records as
State Aid.Project 12-603-05 and MSA Project 146-02-02, public
improvements.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Mounds View that the City does hereby request the
Minnesota Department of Transportation approve the appropriation
of Municipal State Aid Street Funds to be applied toward the
construction of said project.
Adopted this llth day of May, 1987.
ATTEST:
Mayor.
(seal)
Clerk -Administrator
I
� 1L
RESOLUTION NO. 2196
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION REQUESTING THE APPROPRIATION OF
MUNICIPAL STATE AID FUNDS ON COUNTY ROAD I,
RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION
WHEREAS, it has been deemed adviseable and necessary for
the, City of Mounds View to participate in the coat of the
reconstruction of County Road I within the limits of said
municipality; and
WHEREAS, said project has been approved by the Minnesota
Department of Transportation and identified in its records as
State Aid Project 12-603-05 and MSA Project 146-02-03, right-of-
way acquisitions.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Mounds View that the City does hereby request the
Minnesota Department of Transportation approve the appropriation
of Municipal State Aid Street Funds to be applied toward the
+� right-of-way acquisition for said project.
ATTEST:
(seal)
Adopted this llth day of May, 1907.
Mayor
Clerk -Administrator
=01,UTION NO. 2192
® CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF mINNMOTA
APPROVING JUST AND CORRECT
CLAIMS AGAINST CITY FUNDS
WHEREAS, the City Council of -Mounds Viex, pursuant to
Minnesota Statutes 412.241, has full authority over the financial affairs
of the City and;
WEERF,AS, The City Council has reviewed the claims numbers:
22639 through 22720 in the amount of $_86 752.75
•18009 through 21660 in the amount of �iP. 4fa3 5f
through in the amount of t
through in the amount of $
TOTAL AMOUNT OF cjAlI iS PRESENTED $ 147,220.31
and has found said claims to be ,just and correct;
(list. of any excepticn)
NOW THEPJ',FORE, be it resolved that the City Coanoi.l of Mounds View
hereby approved the attached lists of claims datedr,/1 7/82 by the
vote ayes nnyes
ATTEST:
(SEAL)
Mayor
Clerk-Adm(niFIraLor
PAGE I
AMITS PAYABLE OE12f PE9ISTER
PM SS DATE 05/12/81
UIECK DATE 05/12/87
AP-CIO-01
VENDOR DECK LTECK
tICm VIEW
HNVICE
HNICE D ISM I
ANOA4T NIO1tTf
OECK PAY
ASNT TYPE TWICE DESCRIPTION
NO VENDOR NAM 1NN16ER DATE
INVOICE
NO OATS
75101 KATHY CARf'FNIER 22639 05/12/87
05/12/87
16.50
16.50
ACLOINT MEMBER-250-3500-352107 MT-
16.50
DESC R•eF M
VETm TOTAL
16.50
16.50
U75102 COf4ArtiICATIfNI CENTER 22640 05/12/37
58519
04/24197
20.00
20.00
ACCOUNT W ER-100-4200-513DOO At�l�i-
10.00
U-T-MAI4TENM &U TOTAL
20.00
20.00
75103 OS_/11/81
l2[81
16. 0
I6.50
A�LNf NUM-250-3500-352107 rc�
16.50
DE6C--05/_
VENDOR TOTAL
16.50
16.50
75104 OS_�12/61
7.
40.G0
40.00
ACCOUNT NUNFR-700-4121-9022�6402
40.00
OEX-RUND
VEIM TOTAL
40.00
40.00
75105 NIMAE1 EVNIS 22643 05/12/87
05/12/87
19.00
15.00
ACCOIM MNk�ER-250-35OD-354238 NN??
15.00
� TFUA 1
15.00
15.00
75106 FLAMJSE 22644 05/12/87
A76169
04/16/87
$4.47
81.47
ACCONIT MEBER-100-4350-16M AKT-
84.47
� SIMIES
E4.47
84.47
75107 FLOWERS TO GO 22645 05/12/b1
04/28/67
22.26
22.26
ACC(XNT NJt¢4:ft-100-4100-160000 Att((TT
22.26
SUPPLIESVENDOR TOTAL
r.26
22,26
75108 ROGER FAEDSALL 22646 05/12/87
05/17/87
41.35
41.3,
ACMNT NNER-100-418D-1600W NR-
41.35
��l`StT fLIES UTAL
4f.35
41.35
75109 GOOD TINE ATTRACTICISf 22647 OS/12/87 7179
10/3!A
14.25
14.25
ACCOINIT RAO-250-4351-160016 ANT-
14.25
S0
14.25
14.25
�-S
V
75110 DORIS HOGAN 12111 05/12/87
05/12/87
16.50
16.50
ACCUNT NUIBER-250-3500-352107 AMhTT
I6.50
V REFINum E
16.50
16.50
75111 05/12/87
33.00
30.00
ACCOUNT WW-250-3500-3510034 AAIl1ffT
30.00
DESC-REFM2/b1
lip{ TOTAL
30.00
30.00
75112 LUCY N NNSEN 22650 05/12/81
05/12/87
1640
16.50
ACCOUNT NM R-250-M-352107 ANT-
16.50
DESCC-R UM
16.50
I6,50
75113 05/111B7
1t2�/R7
15.03
15.U0
AC�CON�TfEN!YNIBER-250-35DO-354225{1
15.00
DEC-fE
L
PAGE 2
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE DECK, REGISTER
AP-CIO.01
M ims VIER
VDW DECK DECK
INVOICE
IMNIICF
M VE IDOR WE WW DATE
INVOICE WR DATE
M, I
VBTODi TOTAL
IS.W
�5114 DR. GrccOG fE1BEISEN 22652 05/12/87
05/12/87
50.00
AMW ttk%R-250-4352-160119 AMT-
SO.W DESC-RFTatES
vam TOTAL
90.00
75115 MIKE LUTE 22653 OAA/87t.0
/12/87
��
185.00
ACCOT I1A-250-350-352128
VINTIOR
16.00
75116 1-422654 OS/2/81
19.21�/
IES
109.62
AC MR-700121-125M
06DESC
YR.R 7d1AL
109.62
75117 MARY LAfWl 22655 05/12/87
_ OS/l2/87
16.50
ACCOUNT OUR-250-35W-352107 AMMTT
16.50
YDE
TOTAL
16.50
75118 STEPHANIE MAMDIS 22656 05/12/87
O5/12/87
15.00
AMW NMBER-250-3500-354238 AMT-
O
15.00 ��
TOTAL
15.W
75119 LEDMARD ON 22657 0/12/87
05/12/87
15.00
ACCDJTT MUIW-250-3500-352132 AKT-
15.00 ����
IS.W
75120 J. A. IENW. LD 6 ASSDt 22658 05/12/87
0`+/UM
396.00
ACCW WO) R-730-2305-000OW AMT-
3^r6.00 DESC-REFUNDvom
TOIL
396.00
75121 MIM
10.00ACMlfNMR-IO100-360
OA41009OS/2/67
iWT
10,00 IESC-MV UPS
VEIMOR TOTAL
10.00
75122 GRACE ONSGARD 22660 OS/T2/87
(6/12/37
16.50
ACCONT IAfM-250-3500-352107 fWfMT
16.`A ��00
16.50
75123 SUE PDdtOSE 22661 (6/12/87
05/17/87
15.00
ACCOUNT Id W-250-3500-352114 AMT-
15.00 '
YCh' TOTAL
15.00
75124 PEAS@@FU. DECISIDt6 t 22b62 05/12/87
13035/2746 01/29/87
1075.00
Iota
AMOUNT MdfCilT-I00-4120-303000 AMT- 1075.00 ��
SMILE
TPR(FE
OTAL
1075.00
75125 LEWdE PMIMEY 22663 05/12/87
05/12/87
15.00
ACCOUNT OW-250-3500-3521P VOLT-
15.00 I
VD 4-Ra
15.00
MUSS DATE 05/12/87
DECK, DATE 05/12/87
DI:CDNT DEECK PAY
AMNTf AMNT TYIE IWILE DESCBIPTIIN
15.00
50.00
SO.00
185.00
125.00
109.62
109.62
16.50
16.50
15.06
IS.OJ
15.00
15.00
396.00
3i6.00
10.00
10,00
1640
16.50
15.W
Mc*
1075.00
1075.W
15.00
15.00
ACLDAITS PATAItE BECK REMSIER
AP-CIO-01
VDW OED( DECK
1t.141D8 VIEW
INVOICE
INVOICE
w Yam IYPE MM R DATE
INVOICE RM DATE.
MINT
75126"RBPPE 22664 05/12/87
33.00
OS/12/87
DE
33.00
`. AcMW M218ER-250-3500-352107 1-
VENDOR TOTAL
3100
1
75127 RICH PE19ZSON 22665 05,12/81
05/127
40.00
ACCO W MMBER-700-4121`901WO 1./' -
40-W
VENDOR TOTAL
40,00
OA/T21W
75128 ACCOUNT
7
I85.00
�R-150-3523-500128 1
185.00
DESC-�(IF31/N•/7
VENDOR TOTAL
185.00
75129 RITA SUPERDOAF 22667 05/!2/8/
05/12/87
15.00
ACCOLNY MMBER-250-3500-352132 ANT-
MOO
�I
TOTAL
15.00
05A/T2187
75130 &ANETIAMUNTEURR-IW-4350-19
12/07
6,50
000
6.50
DESC-DFDI IES
VENDOR MIX
6.50
75131 GLADYS STORK. 22669 %1219?
16.50
OS/12/B7
16.50
KWM WtM-250-3500-352107 1-
VEM TOTAL
16,50
75132 ON 2197
D
I5,00
ALCONI MMBER-250-M-351320 MT
15.00
cps REF
YEIM, 701AL
15.00
75133 OS(12/81
OSpa/j,1I/B7
16.50
ACROL CCONT MIM-250-3500-351071
16.50
t�
VEMIR TOTAL
16,50
75134 GTE
40.00
16052/87
kMW 100-4350-390M �40.00
815
DS- RATID13
6E18XTR TO(1L 40.00
135 &APYO;OIItIT IMA1M-250-35W-3521073 Ofi�/NIZi87
R87
16,50
16.50
EMMU
Vem. TOTAL
16.50
75136 MARY THOE 22674 05'12/87
OS/12/87
PtlEMOR
ib,50
AM M MMHER-250-3 00.354107 Alf
16.50
V TILL
16.50
75137 ODIISSMINGj OFFICER%12/87 L
9,00
16C4005 A�
9.00
SLPFLIE7
VENDOR TOTAL
9.00
75138 76 OS/f2/81
EN 1R1�1
16.50
AACCOONY -250-3500-3510WATT
16.50
DESC-R5/12/87 EFUND
TRIXESB DATE 05/12/87
UUK M1E 05/12/87
DISCLKNI DFCK
PAT
A,= MCI!!T
TYPE INVOILL DSCRIPTIM
33.00
33.00
40.00
40.00
103.00
105.00
15.00
15.0
6.50
6.50
16.50
16.50
15.00
15.00
16.50
16.50
40.00
40.00
16.50
16.50
Ib.50
16.50
9.00
9.00
16.50
PAGE 4 ACMNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER
AP-CIO-OL
wi m VIEW
4EfO10R CHECK CHECK
INVOICE
INVOICE
IU VENDOR 161E NRO ER DATE INVOICE W DATE
MY
Mm. TOTAL
16.50
1820 ADVANCEO PRINTING 22677 05/12/87 21270
04 28/87
1440.00
ACCOLHT ILPIBER-100.4190-343000 ANT- 720.00
DESC-PRINTING
ACCOUNT N MBER-100-4350-343000 ANT- 720.00
OESC-FRINTING
VENOKIR TOTAL
1440.00
A4985 W£RICAN LINEN SLPFLY# 22678 05/12/87 P97200427 04/27/87
10.00
ACCO NT NLKO-100-4190-3550DO AMT- 10.00
CESC-RAOS 6 TG1RS
VENDOR TOTAL
10.00
A5180 AIERICAN RED CROSS 22679 05/12/87 12572
04/14/87
.12.00
ACCOIAGT NLOW-250-4354.160234 AMT- 32.00
DCSC-S MIGS
VENDOR MAL
32.00
B4510 BLAINE LOCK 6 KEY 22AM 05/12/87 1409
01/02/87
2.0.00
ACCOLM 11 W-IOD-4200-513000 AMT- 20.00
1EX-MAINTE ANCc
VENDOR TOTAL
20.00
C3127 CRIPPEUA SPRINGS COAP+ 22681 05/12/87
04/17/67
19.?4
ACCLLNT NJW-100.4260.40100D AMT- 13.25
UESC-FkNTAI.
ACCOUNT H41RER-100-4160-16000 ANT- 6.09
1ESC-SLPPLIES
VENOOR TOTAL
19.34
C5960 CONfEI. MIT CORPORA# 22682 05/12/87
04/13/87
Vii.97
ACLLINT NUIIBER-100-4190-310000 AMT- 300.97
DESC ICATICNS
VEt64A 70TAL
3C0.97
C5480 CONTRACT MEANING 226M 05/12187
04/15/87
%8.00
ACCQM IUM-100.4190-3510DO AMT- 530.00
IES:-0MY SCRVIil
ACCOUNT N1.M-100-4190-121000 AMT- 28.00
IE. -SPPLIES
VE)m TOTAL
5S?.00
C9700 CY'S MENS AFAR 22684 (65112/87 28744
596.30
04/23/07
586.30
ACCO NT NIIM-100.4200-240000 AST-
DESC-MIFIiOS
22684 09/12/07 28662
04/02/87
?).45
ACCOGNT NBNOER-IDD-4240-240WO AMT- 30.45
CESC-OYIFIi3S
VENDOR TOTAL
616.75
00545 GkLAOTERS SERVICE INN 22M 05/12/87 251495
7
29.00
ACCOUNT NLMBER-255-4121-356000 ANT- 29.00
DESC-04/30/8COLIET:T10N
V€.W TOTAL
29.00
IS840 GOOOIN COWANY 226M 05/12/87 426270
04/16/87
174.98
ACCQMT N10TER-700-4121-125000 ANT- 174.90
DESC-SIMIF.S
72686 05/12/87 428072
04/24/87
5.86
ACCOUNT NJIGBER-100.4360-16M WT- 5.86
OESC-SLMIES
64IDOR TOTAL
180.81
D5850 GUM ATIWIC SUPPI.+ 22687 05/12/87 7042530
04/29/87
253.70
FM'35 DAIE 05/12/87
DECK GATE 05/12/87
OISCOONT DEM PAY
MY WIGANT TYPE INVOICE DESCRIPTIUNI
16.50
1440.00
1440.00
10.00
10.00
32.00
32.00
20.00
20.00
19.34
19.34
300.97
300.97
5-i8.00
5 Q.00
5?b.30
30.45
616.75
29.00
29.00
174.98
5.86
180.84
253.70
PAGE 5 AMMfS PATARLE CHECK PSISM
AP-CIO-01
NCMOS VIEW
VENDOR C1EM DECK
11TVDICE
1MNICE
NO VENDOR WE KNO DATE INVOICE 110 DATE
AMOiMT
ALCCMT N MBER-250-4351-160030 MT- 253.70
DESC-SUPPLIES
VENDOR TOTAL
253.70
rb800 MAS I, CRAVEN 220 05/12/87 14813
04/24/87
353.90
ACCOLNT tUM-100-2303-000889 AYE- 353.90
DESC-ATMIN GORGES
VEOIOR TOTAL
353.90
15540 INSTT-FRINTS 226V 05/12/87 3580
04/24/87
82.80
ACCOUNT WKR-IOD-4190-343652 AKT- 82.80
��-
iIITAIPRI�
8 .80
K5700 KOKESN ATHLETIC 22690 05/12/R7 1521
0341/27
M IES
487,AD
ACCOUNT MMBER-250-4352-121120 if�ffff 97.20
ACCOUNT MMBER-250.4352-121119 MT- 76.50
DESC- El PLIES
ACLU W 1L4®ER-100-4360-121000 AYE- 314.10
VFW FLIES
481.80
K5890 KORTIEM'S SALES 22691 05/12/87 M606
MOP
'W-88
NT ACCOMMBER-100-4260-123000 AAMNff 330,89
EESC-RPPLIES
1 12691 05112187 003713
04/23/87
53.05
ACCOUNT M1MER-100.4260-12S-AO AKT- 53.C6
DEM-JUIIES
R
333.93
L0560 LOUT BUILDING QENT* 22692 0/12/tr 75PI
04/13/87
41.15
ACMW N W-100-4360-70300M 15
TOLOUTLAY
DESC-CAPITOL
5/141.
22692 02787 7
O
17.07
ACCOUNT N11BER-100.4360-705030 ANT- 17.07
� �� WILAT59
02
L0730 LAYNE MIIIESOTA COM?Ai 22643 05/12/87 9864
ACCUNT NMBER-700.4121-70136016093 05M/12/87 �700
ACCOUNT NMC4:R-700-4121-10 672�093 05�1/ 2/81 2i�6e
ACCOUNT 1AM ER-700.4121-7"M OS% 2� 2�600
226UACCOUNT MADER-700.4121.703030 AiT- 1C05.00
L3545 LILLIE ERMAN ACAS 22694
0/12/P' 9087
0412YI87
55.32
ACCOM IOMR-499-4121-341000
AYT-
17.0
DESC-ROVERTISEIEh7
ACLU W NUOER-100.4100-341000
AKT-
37.66
VENDPR �T15EENT
55.32
L3515 LINCOLN ELEVATOR %RV# 22695
05/12: '
5426
04/23/87
24.G0
MBE ACCOUNT NR-100.4190-513000
AM
C4'00
DESC-UNIERANCE
24.00
10300 MCU
1
StRA1040.00
ACCOUNT NUER-250.4352-391120602/07
256.0
DC-�11TN
PRCOCISS HECK DATE5/
AT0/ 0512/887
DISMIT CMd}: PAY
AR4:4NT MI TYPE (MICE DESCRIPTION
253.70
353.90
353.90
92.80
02.80
407.00
487.8D
330.89
53.05
303.93
41.15
11.87
59.02
736.00
119.6.1
2274.00
IM1.00
4134.68
55.32
55.32
24.00
24.00
1040.00
PAE 6 ACCUNT6 PATAOLE CHM. REGISIER
AP-CIO.01'
MURK VIEW
VENBGR DECK CHECK
INATILE INVOICE
NO VEND WE Kim MIE IMICE IM DATE AW)IT
ACCUNT M4 M-250-4352-391I19 AMT• 656.00
IESC-REGISTRATION
ACCOINT IIUM-250-4352-371125 ANT- 128.00
I�IRA REGiSTICN
TOTAL 1040.00
111000 IICCAI.L INCORPORATED 22697 05/12/87 7025
04/29/87 579.83
ACM MAaM-730.4121-174W AMT- 579.93
�RM ES
579.I3
M2170 METRO WASTE CONTROL Ci 72698 05 12187
05/01/87 3'?J07.16
ACCM MIM-730-4120-3230W A I- ''n7.16
�SN1ERRVI
TOTAL
Mt2250 RICHARD METERS 22699 05/12/67
0-9t14/87 5927.50
ACCOUNT NED-100-4160-3010C3 A9T- 1137.50
DEY'LFCAL MICE
ACCGINT 14UIBFR-649-4121-301000 AMT- 275.M
Do%S LEG1. SERVICE
Aa Mt®E&1W-4160-�70W MT- 412255,00
OE9C-LECAL E NICE
ACCOIITT MAIBER-I00-4160.301000 PIT- MOO
SERVICE
V��LTGTN��
M442 MID EST ASTI Y CCRP0# 22703 05/12/8/ 037213
04/3Oi87 M1.00
ACCON MtM-IM-43 0-7050M A - QW•W
GARY
VDESC-CAPITtUR ?.TO
M3980 MN-CONWAY F01 OS 12/87 56
�26
ACCOUNT MJR-IW-42260-12i002.00EM-9PLCS
22701 05/12/87 91966
04/14/87 8.50
ACCOUNT NLIM-730-4121-1230M AMT- 9.50
CEESC`�S�LIESVEND
34.50
M4000 MIN ESOTA DAILY 22702 05/12/87 W34195
OJI10 $7 17.85
ACCDLM 000-1W-4350-160M0 AMT- 17.65
ESVum
T
TOE 17.05
M5400 MIRACLE RECREATION EDt 22703 05/12/87 276679
04 Iff 5497.00
ACCOUNT MANBER !W 4360-70
DESr-CCOPAf
3 05/1'1875276677
17//887Ur*M.W
ACCOUNT M!®ER-IW-4360-70'-<MO AMT- 12M.M
VESC-CTWITOO/gL OIIOTAL
t 175B2.M
N42M OifT2/87
SCR
17.05
ANORTHERNCCOU IT 2555--441121-321M04 17.65
DESC-U11L1TY7
V130YN TOTAL 17.85
115945 NOVACK INC 12/87
5 /1'
0477197 14M.M
ACCUYT MMP11UM.00
M9ER•730-4121-1230
DESC- atP/T U
VE m TMAL 140D.00
P0680 05/f2/81
f50.M
ACLU IT NUMBER-IW4120-3MOO 150.M
DM-f!/1�7
RMYY'.SS MIE 05/12/87
DECK DATE 05/12/07
DISMNT CHECK PAT
(9E41A AMUNT TYPE INVOICE IESCRIP101
1040.00
577,83
57Y.83
33501.I6
33`A7.16
5927.50
5927.50
8080.00
8080. W
26.00
8.50
31.50
17.85
17.6
5497.00
12085.00
17582.M
17.OS
17.85
1100.00
1400.00
150.00
PACE 7
ACCOUTIS PAYABLE CIECK REGISIER
AP -CIO -Of
WITS VIEW
VQDQi CHECK
CfW
INVOICE IR/OICE
NO VENDOR NVE tA1MBER
DATE 19410E IRM DATE AMMIT
MM TOTAL 150.00
'075 PENNSTLVAHIA OIL COtPE 22707
05/12/87 871130420 04/27/87 66.21
ACCOUNT MM-730-4121-160000
AMT- 66.21
OE.SC-SUPPLIES
VENDOR TOTAL 66.21
ROW RAMSEY COUNTY TRFiLgRi 22108
05/12/87 C05236
04/17/87 931.89
ACCOUO I&MB-100-4150-303000
AMT- 310.97
[ESC PRRESSIONW SETNICES
ACCOUNT NOICR-700-4120-303000
MT- 310.96
DES PRCFESSIUVV SERVICES
ACCQNT NNIBER-730-4120-30M
ANT- 310.76
IM-PKFES31RTAL SCRVICES
22708 05/12/87 D04046
ACWT MIM-100-4270-32`5000 PPMM 87.90
04/23/87 109.35
DESC-5TRTNEET LIGHTS
CUNT MRKR-100-4270.51M
AMC- 21.45
DESC-CA TEIkfE
22700 05/12/87 P04091
04/16/87. 2302.47
ACCUT MMBER-100-4270-358000
AMT- 2302.47
DESC-PLOW
k SAHO
VF1DDR TOTAL
3344.71
R5630 ROAD WI ER 22709 05/12/97 2183 03/15/51 10.60
ACCOUNT M30lER-100-4150-303000 MT- 3.54 SERVICE
ACCOUNT M M-700-4120-30306L- ALIT- 3.53 DESC-PRWESSIM SERVICE
ACCC NT NUTPER-730-4120-303000 AMT- 3.53 DESC-PFUESSIONAL SERVILE
4fhM TOTAL 10.60
R5990 ROYAL CROWN 22710 05/12/97 476315 04/22/87
ACMIRT MMIER-100-3612.00OOCh MT- 38.50 DW--POP
WMR TOTAL
51025 ST PAID k REM BUR 22711 05/12/87 69495
04/14/87
ACCalff NIM-250-4351-160021 MY- 70.00
DM-S.Y"Li DES
22711 05712/87 69979
04/09/87
ACCOUNT MNBER-250-4351-160021 MY- I16.3D
CESC-SYPLIES
22711 05/12/87 1,9497
04/09/87
ACCOUNT MME¢A-250-4351-160021 ANT- 55.00
DESC-UTLIES
22711 05/12/87 69496
04/09/87
ACCOW NKU-250-4351-16MI ANT- 55.0D
OES:-StPPLTES
VEMiit TOTAL
' 215 CITY OF HEVIEW 22712 05/12/87 48-87 04/27/87
ACC'OINT NUIBER-250-4352-160119 TBR- 60.68 DESC-SlPMIES
VEIM TOTAL
SSMWS SNYOEIS DRUG STORES 22713 05/12/07 117716 04/21/87
ACCOUNT Mdffiik-250-4352-160119 MY- 9.41 DESC-DSIPLIES
22713 OS I87 117717 04/22/87
ACCONTNLMS-100-4200-160000 A� 47.37 V:SC-SPPI.IES
VENDOR TOTAL
33.50
38.50
70.00
116.30
55.00
55.00
296.30
60.68
60.68
9.41
47.37
56.78
56300 SPRING LAE PARK LINO# 22714 05/12/97 2494 03/30/87 5.60
ACCOUNT RIM-100-4360-703ON AMT- 5.60 DESC-CAPITOL IKIR-AY
22714 05/12/87 2925 04/06/87 7.76
MESS MIE 05/12/87
DECY. 1141E 0/12/07
DISCOUNT CHECK PAT
ANOLNT WWI TYPE IRIOICE DESCRIPTION
150.00
66.21
66.21
932.89
109.35
2302.47
3344.71
10.60
10.60
3R.50
39.50
70.00
116.30
55.00
55.00
296.30
60.68
60.68
9.41
47.37
56.78
5.60
7.76
PAGE 8 AMINTS PATAELE !]Ely( REGISTER
AP-CIO-01- Rim YIEW
V mU9 DECK LIECK. INVOICE IN5910E DISCOLNT
NA VENDOR WE MUlfc£R BATE INVOICE WEA DATE MOUNT AMOUNT
ACCOUNT WIIBER-100-4360-703M AMT- 7.76 DESC-0CAPITOL OUTLAY
ACCOUNT Un-100-4360-7040004 OS/i2/d7 2 9.60 DESC-CWHOL7OUT1AY 9.60
P11 l`ENDOR TOTAL 22.96
T22255 TEXGAS 22715 05/12/87 SF5409968 04/28/87
ACCOUNT NJW-100.1260- 5 AKT- 5F88.40 IA DEC-IOR'
ACCOUNT NUMBER-100-1260-OOM AYT- 281.82 DESC..-I OR"
VE!" TOTAL
T5795 TOLL COfPANT 22716 0;/12/B7 0737" 04/21/87
ACCOUNT NRW-100-4360-121000 AYT- 14.75 OESE-StFXIES
VFUIOR TOTAL
I= IINITOG RENTALS SYSTEM 22717 05/11/87 M740327 03/27/97
ACCOUNT WPW-IOD-4260.24M ANT- 51.30 BESC-UNIFORIS
22717 05/12/87 2032740417 04/17/87
ACCOUNT N M ER-100-4270-240000 A - 84.00 OM-SUFPLIES
22717 05/12/97 183210424 04/24/87
ACCOUNT NUM-7304121-240000 AMT- 42.90 DESC-STFPL.IES
22717 05((12/6 2831740501 05/01!87
ACCOUNT NUmER-700-4121-240000 Rl - 85.20 MSC-LNIFUUIS
VTmw TOTAL
VIODO VAN PAPER COMPANY 22718 09/12/87 47943 04/20/97
ACCOUNT MW-100-4360-1210DO AAPIITT 161.00 DESC-51PAl.IES
ACCOUNT I MBEA-l00.4160-1665hT) AMY- 259.20 DESC-SIlTtIES
TZKR TOTAL
W0750 WATER PRODUCTS CDIPANi 22719 03/12/87 034694 04/20/87
ACCOUNT RPM-700-4121-125M AMT 1628.0 BM-R. LIES
WM TOTAL
Z4000 ZIEGLER INC 22720 05/12/87 M78623 04/29/87
ACCOUNT MiUIBER-700.4121-125000 AMT- 29.11 DFSC-RMIES
22720 05/12/87 MC783504 04/28/97
ACCOUNT N1W-700-4121-12M AMA 50.64 DESO-SatIES
VEW TOTAL
68.40
281.82
170.12
14.75
14.75
51.30
64.00
42.96
r;.20
263.40
420.20
420.20
1628.00
1628.00
29.11
58.64
$7.75
PRO(T5S DATE 05/12/87
CIECK DATE 05/12/87
DECY, FAY
ANOINT TYPE INVOICE DESIAIPTION
9.60
22.96
8S.40
281.82
370.22
14.75
14.75
51.3D
84.00
42.90
85.20
263.40
420.20
420.20
1628.00
1628.00
29.11
58.64
67.75
UWVD TOTAL 86752.75 8102.75
PACE 1
ACCON9 PAYABLE PPE -PAID CHECK REGISIER
AP-CIO-02•,
MOM VIEW
VENODA DECK
CHECK
INWICE
INVOICE DISLOLNT
NO VD" NAME WMIER
DATE
IINOICE WN DAFE
AMMF Amur
P2165 CITY OF MONS VIER 1P009
04/06/87
04/06/87
93,67
0104f ACIHUM-IOD-4120-YZW
ANT-
17.00
D✓:SC-
ACCOIXtf IUM-250-4353-391205
1MT-
10.00
DESC-REGISTRATION
ACCOUNT tXMBER-100.4190-380000
ANT-
2.50
DESC-MILEAGE
ACCM N M-100-42OD-I60000
ANT-
8.25
DESC-SIPPLIES
ACCOUtIT NMBfA-100-4180.160000
ANT-
26.90
EFSC-SUFPLIES
AM Mf MM-100-4190-114000
ANT-
19.01
DESC-SLPPLIES
ACCOIJNT NXOJER-100-4270-1240M
AMT-
1.00
EESC=.APPLIES
ACCOLNT MM-100-4190-33M
AMT-
9.01
DESC-KETAGE
VEW TOTAL
93.67
S1240 RICHARD SLIMIDLIN 18034
04/24/81
04/?4/87
40.00
ACCOUNT NX41ER-100-4260-040000
AMT-
40.00
DESC-I0SPCE
ow TOTAL
40.00
K06,L5 OARY KARDELL 18035
01/24/81
04/24/W
40.00
ACCOIMT HXW-100-4270-0400M
W??
40.00
DESC-INAwa
Vemm IOIAL
40.00
D1910 LARRY CECIEIE 18036
04/24/07
09/24187
40.64
ACalW N O-100-4360.040DOO
AaTT-
40.00
116AM
VDLIR TOTAL
40.00
HKi515 NILLIAM WMI 18037
04/2418-7
04/14/87
40.00
XMINT IUM-700-4121-04M
ANT-
40.00
LESC-I36' MIE
VE3 = TOTAL
40.00
H m WILLIAM NMI 18038 04/24/01
04/24i87
40.00
A=fT MMPER-700-4121-04M
AMMii
40.W
DES-INSUPAki
14 MDOR TOTAL
40.00
WALLACEMM MORTETSON 18039 04/24/87
04/24/87
40.00
ACCOMf NUIEER-730-4121-04M
AMT-
40.00
IMMMM
VENDOR
40.00
H348D CARL NORLANVER 16040 04/14/a7
04/24/07
S0.00
OLMT ACCMMIER-100-4180-020000
ANT-
50.00
ESC- RRIESVEVAN
TOTAL
50.00
C5915 COMMISSIONER OF IEVENt 18041 04/24/87
04/24/87
-1 9.93
ACCOMf MP03ER-100-3321-OOM
AMT-
.72
CESC-S lS TAX RUM
ACCOIXif NRM-700-3821-000001
AMT-
359.21
IESC-SALES FAX (FFUt01
VE?W TOTAL
49.93
F3636 1ST STATE B(P4C OF tEN+ 18043 040J�4/87
04/24/87 37114,13
OST.-SNARIES
ACCOIIR NLKU-IW4120-010000
AYf- 1621.60
ACMKr tUM-100-4150-010000
(MT- 2612.20
EESC-SALARIES
ACCOUNT MMBER-100-4180-OIM
Aff- 1004.89
OESC-SALARICS
ACCOUNT OM-100-4190-OIM
AN-
52.00
CESC-SALARIES
ACCOOff IAMBER-100-4200.010000
APIT- 14180,93
DESC-SALARIES
PROCESS DATE 05/12/87
CHECK PAY
MIT TYPE INVOICE DESTRIPEXON
93.67 X
93.67
40.00 X
40,00
40.00 X
40.00
40.00 X
40.00
40.00 1
40.00
40.00 X
40.00
40.00 X
40.00
50.00 X
50.00
359.93 X
359.93
31114.13 X
PACE 2
AP-CIO-02
mNO�VMD[it NNE
ACCDWfS PATARS PfE-PAID DECK RCOISTER
ND1.f815 Viol
MASS DAIE 05/12/87
DED( DECK INVOICE MMOICE OISCDiiTT DECK PAT
00 MTE INVOICE tOfBR DATE NUNT WMT W"T TTPE IMILE DESCRIPTION
MT- 121.2b
MT- 22.01
ANT- 59.13
ANT- 07.89
ANT- 155.25
Mf- 57.01
ANT- d3.50
NTT- 71.99
NT- 7A
NIT- 130.00
NIT- 404.75
ANf- 266.5D
AD- 910.69
MT- 43.%0
ANT- 2307.70
AYE- 72A
MY- 918.82
AYE- 43.50
Mr- 2350.31
ANY- 36.30
ANT- 19.50
01(2+/87
MT- 1.97
MT- 8.29
NIT- 8.82
ANf- 1.19
AST- 1.20
ANY- 5.86
ANT- 3.D6
A T- 115.94
IM35 INS.35 T
W-CIO-02
VENDOR
N O VEt✓DOt WE
ACCOUNT
®ACCOUNT
Acmw
ACCOUNT
ACCOUNT
ACCOUNT
ACC
ACO
COUNT
ACCOUNT
ACCOUNT
ACCOUNT
ACCOUNT
��
USCHEER
CHECK
pIT-
AMr-
k0-
f9tY-
AIIT-
f4fT-
AMT-
ml-
AMI-
AIIT-
MT_
AMT-
AMT-
An-
or-
12216 ACCOUNT VTDEO MER-100-4190-303665525 04/27/8
P7900
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PAID CHECK REDISIER
7
VISE
INVOICE INVOICE DISCOUNT
INVOICE M GATE AMOIAO moil
186.77
DEESC-MEDICARE
77.58
IESC-MEDICARE
39.75
asc-tEDICATE
69.94
DESC-01CARE
13.51
M C-IEDICARE
90.99
CESC- EDICATE
83.06
DESC•MEDICAIE
147.36
DESC•1EDIPAM
16.50
DESC-IEDICARE
67.52
MEDICARE
82.71
11ESC•NEDICARE
170.19
lE6C IEDICAIiE
170.64
OSL•KD CA?F
40.18
O� NEDIPlRE
40.18
0fSC-lEIIiC/VE '
64.35
DE6C 10TIL
V�7RIRpp4TOTAI. 3062.46
27ESSIDNAL
43.98
IFSC TA SERVICES
VE7EOR TOTAL 43.98
Oi/28/87 0 mi8I zwtr.zi
AMi- 30.66
(jMT- 111.02
ANT- 46.10
An- 23.63
MT- 41.54
ANT- 1810,70
AMT- 8.03
AMT• 54.09
AMr 49.37
AIIT- 87.57
p T- 49.16
ANT- 9.W
AMT- 40.13
AKT- 101.16
ART- 101.43
ANT- 37.48
ALIT- 37.48
AM1• 23.88
ANT- 23.88
I0050 ICMA RETIREMENT COiPOf 18047 OI/28/87 04/1,
ACCOUNT NLIMBER-100-4120-035000 wpss�i 76.11 OE6C•PENSI
ACCOUNT NNBER-100-4230-035000 PMT- 76.50 � P OR O&1&�ON6
86900 BRIGHTON TRAVEL INC 18048 04/27/87 04/29/87
11
2687.24
153.00
153.00
298.00
PfMca DATE 05/12/87
CHECK PAY
fr10ONT IYPE INVOICE DESCRIPTION
38622.48
43.98 X
43.98
2,687.24 X
2687.24
153.00 X
153.00
298.00 X
PAGE 4
VIM Ob
PECK C1ECI(
Vr7aDOR
NO VENDOR µME NIHfER LATE
ACCRR4f Idi16ER-IDD-4120.362652 AMT-
® A675 MIKSOTA MUTUAL LIFE 18049 04/29/87
AM1A n tdA1BFA-100.4200.04ODOO AMT-
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE FIE -PAID DECK, MISTER
NORMS VIEW
INVOICE
INVOICE DISMI
INVOICE MtIR DATE
"At AXIUNT
298.00 LEA:-CONFEfIM
VEt81C8 TOTAL
298.00
04/29/87
10.20
3.40 DESC-INMNCE
6.80 DESC-INSIIR ME
VENRJR TOTAL 10.20
F3425 FIDELITY 8050 04/30/87
04/30/07 64.10
A COIRIT NI W-100-4120-041000
MIT
1.45
DESC-IN SUFIA CE
ACCOUNT NUMBER-100.4150-041000
ANT-
7.26
aSC-INSWARCE
AMIT NUIBER-100.4180.041000
AMT-
3.86
SC-It45UACE
ACCOIAIT MH -100-4190-041000
MT-
2.90
OES'-MRANCE
32.90
ACCOIRIT td!m-100.420•041000
Ali-
DESC-IL '
ACCOIM MHBER-100-4270-0410DO
MT-
2.90
DESC•Ih91Ra
ACCO W MHBER-100 4230.041000
AIT-
1.45
DESC- GRACE
ACCOMT tAHIER-100 4350.041000
MIT-
5.80
CESC-INMACE
A=LwT tAROER•!00.4360.041000
MY
2.90
DESC IN,ULM4CF
ACOM NUMBER-700.4121-041000
MIT,
5.30
OEIC•1119RF:4CE
Aawff
JWa
pCC411NT NUMBER-730•4121-041M
MT-
5.80
DESC-ItFK.XPA`CE
ACCRM NUIBER-730.4120-04ION
AiT-
3.14
DE�1119 CEVEI84.10
L0250 LMCIT HEALTH PROTECTIF 21651 04/30/87
04/30/87 MID
AIIXRtT KHC4:R-100-4120-040000
ANY-
61.13
kSC-ItGW m
ACCOUNT NIM-100.4200-040000
ANT-
61.13
UESC-INRMICE
ACCRX'4f NUDIER-100.4200.040DOO
ANT-
157.84
ITN NCE
280.10
MM CITY OF MUA✓o5 VIEW 21652 04/30/67
04/30/87 150.00
ACCOUNT NLM-100-4100-160000
AIT-
150.00
FlUM
VD RR�T[IlA- 150.00
M0470 M WIFE AGETCY INC 21653
04/30/87
04/30/87 158C4.00
ACCUNT Nl1BER-100 4140 480000
ANT-
3?91.M
[ESC [NaATAET
ACCRRIT MJW-IDO-4120-050000
MIT-
114.59
DESC-IA'lik CUT' IlG
ACMW
�-M. L � ITS
MM-100.4'60
MT-
314.23
ACMKT tAffl)EER-100-4190-05M
ANT-
17.99
1rSC-1A)itK CHP INS
592.26
ACCOUNTMM
N4MR 10000-4200-050M230.0'5M
AMf
DISC-M cowIN&
ACCOUNT MA4C4:R-100.9240.05M
ANT-
49.61
TEK•WRK CRP Ih5
ALS-RPIT tMER-100-4100-0500W
AMf-
609.55
PESC-f1UlK CRP INS
ACCUI 17fMlER-100.4270-050000
DhT-
231.72
DFSC FXYOS CR9 !h5
ACCRRN N11M-100.4350-05OOW
ANT-
1248.63
DESC•WOWC MIP UG
ACCW MM-100-4360.050000
MT1-
613.92
DESC-WliSK CRP 116
SC-NQR4i � INS
ACm NT NU R-70000.4121-05000M0
I.
5Z5.6688
O NS
PROCESS DALE 05/12/87
DECK PAY
WIT IYFE INVOICE DESCRIPTION
298.00
10.20 X
10.20
84.10 X
84.10
200.10 X
280.10
150.00 X
1SOM
15904.00 X Kn C(M
ACCWS
PAYABLE PAE-PAID CIEcK RE61SIER
VIO-02' CHECK
INVOICE IMOTT DIET
S 1AtE DATE
NSA
No VENDURALCOUTf
INVOICE MM DATE
NU�I'FR-730-4120-05M Atli
382.12 08 LESC.m COMP INS
1904.00
ACCOUTT tkW 730.4121-05W AM 1382.12
VENDOR TOT L
® 21655 05/01/87
U0300 U S P05111ASTFA AMT-
pCCOUtf !llA1BEA-100.4350-330000
05/01/87 395-9
M-59 EDga-PTTACE
VE,y,� TOTAL 395.59
P0680 D iD PAUEY 21656 OJ_/_M/87
05104107 24.E
24.30
AccamT NTrmEA-loo-4100-160000 mi
O� TOTAL 24.N
75139 0 NELSON 21657 05/04/87
U80 303000 AMf
05164/87 5.-00
539.00
�I& 537.07
ACCC m NUIBFR !00
VEND
72216 CAPTAIN VIDEO 21659 05/04/87
-
ACCO W I4IM-100.4120.303652 Ol1Tirqm
3340 05/04/Y7 37.98
37.98 DErC- tODFTEESSIRW. 1 ! MS
37.98
p+ 21659 OS)05187
75140 MI�N�T LANDSCAPE 4350 39 165 5A
05105187 94.00
94.00 Lfs1%-1E6fSTZi Aum. 94.00
VEIOICR TOTAL
U0300 U S POSTWTSTEA 21660 05/05/87 SC-FlL�I 7 'O
ACCOUTf IUIBEA f00 419D 330000 MY.00 VD" TOTAL 50G.00
UWD TOTAL 60467.56
MUSS DATE 05/12/87
CHECK PAT
MIT TTFE INVOICE OWIPTION
15804.00
395.59 1
395.58
24.30 X
24.3D
0.00 1
MOD
37.98 1
37.98
94.00 1
MOD
500.00 1
5DO.OD
50467.56
A
11
MEMO TO: MAYOR bID CITY COONCI
FROM: CLERK -ADMINISTRATOR(
DATE: MAY 7, 1987
��u
SUBJECT: MINOR SUBDIVISION REQUEST - TED AND PAMELA
LAUTZENHEISER, 8121 LONG LAKE ROAD
PLANNING CASE NO. 205-87
MARVIN KELLY, 2521 SHERWOOD ROAD
PLANNING CASE NO. 206-87
Attached to this memorandum please find a Staff Memorandum
to the Planning Commission explaining the situation
regarding these two minor subdivision requests, copies of
the- applicant's planning application and their st:rveys,. The
Planning Commission reviewed these applications at their
meeting on the evening of May 6th and concurred with the
Staff recommendation that they should be approved in one
action in order to avoid the possibility of creating a land-
locked lot. The Planning Commission adopted Resolution No.
185-87 Approving the Minor Subdivision and conditioning it
upon the applicant's providing acceptable abstracts to the
City and filing those abstracts with Ramsey County.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff would
requested minor subdivisions
and Marvin Kelley by adopting
DFP/mjs
recommend Council approve the
by Ted and Pamela Lautzenheiser
Resolution No. 2197.
MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. 185-87
i
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL REGARDING MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING
CASE 205-87 TED AND PAMELA LAUT7ENIIEISER, 8121 LONG LAKE ROAD
AND MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING CASE 206-87 MARVIN KELLEY, 2521 SHERWOUD
ROAD'
WHEREAS, Ted and Pamela Lautzenheiser, 8121 Long Lake Road
have requested approval of a Minor Subdivision subdividing the
east 120 feet of Lot 6, Block 4, Laport Meadows from their
property; and
WHEREAS, Marvin Kelley, 2521 Sherwood Road has requested
approval of a Minor Subdivision combining the east 120 feet of
Lot 6, Block 4, Laport Meadows with his current parcel which is
the cast 120 feet of Lot 5, Block 4, Laport Meadows thus creating
a combined lot of 120 feet by 200 feet; and
WHEREAS, City Staff has reviewed the proposed Minor Subdivi-
sions and determined that they are in compliance with all
applicable City Codes; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the Minor Sub-
divisions and concurred with the conclusions reached by City
Staff.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning
Commission recommends approval of the Minor Subdivisions
submitted by Ted and Pamela Lautzenheiser anti Marvin Kelley,
Planning Cases 205-87 and 206-87 respectively.
BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning
Commission directs staff to forward this resolution to the CiLy
Council prior to approval of the minutes.
Adopted this 6th day of May, 1987
ATTEST:
Chairman
(SEAL)
Clerk -Administrator
Coe'
Viirri
U
MEMO TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: CLERK -ADMINISTRATOR
DATE: MAY 7, 1987
SUBJECT: COUNTY ROAD I RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION
As you know, it will be necessary that right-of-way be
acquired along certain portions -of the southern side of
County Road I to allow for the construction of the road and
sidewalks. Staff has contacted the property owners where
right-of-way acquisition easements and driveway curb cuts
are involved by certified letter and will be hopefully
negotiating right. -of. -way acquisition on all of these parcels
between now and the end of this month. A problem could
arise, however, should the City not be successful in
obtaining right-of-way for all of the parcels involved as
any delays in right-of-way acquisition obviously have
commensurate delays in the project starting date.
Should Staff be unsuccessful in obtaining right -of. -way, the
only alternatives available to the City are to cancel the
project, modify the project or condemn the property needed
for right-of-way acquisition. Based on those options, Staff
would request Council authorization to have the City
Attorney file for condemnation of any right-of-way not being
acquired by June 1 of 1987. This would allow the City
Attorney to file the appropriate documents in an expeditious
manner and allow the 90 day waiting period for condemnation
to expire prior to September 1 which is the anticipated
starting date for the underground construction involved in
this project. I would point out that the attorney will be
the final decider as to whether or not actual condemnation
papers would be filed for any individual parcel and I would
only be recommending condemnation when I feel that no other
alternative is available through negotiation. Your approval
of this request would be greatly appreciated in order to
avoid any unnecessary delays in this project.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Council authorize the City
Attorney to file for condemnation of needed right-of-way for
the reconstruction of County Road I should the City be
unsuccessful in negotiating acquisition of said
right-of-way prior to June 1 of 1987.
DFP/mjs
r-
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA SESSION
MAY 18, 1997
7:00 P.M.
1. Continued Discussion Regarding Placement of Portable
Classroom Building in a City Park
2. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding Conditional
Use Permit Request from Amoco Oil, 2000 Trunk Highway 10
3. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding Dailey
Knolls Preliminary Plat
4. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding Cable Budget
5. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding Fire
Inspection
6. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding Citv of
Mounds View Job Values
7. Consideration of Proposal to Increase Deductible on
City's Liability Insurance Coverages
8. Consideration of 1988 Budget Calendar
9. Consideration of Draft Environmental Impact Statement
Mounds View Business Park
9
PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITUIA PPROVED
® CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA
Regular Meeting
May 11, 1987
Mounds View City Hall
2401 Hwy. 10, Mounds View, MN 55112
-------------------------------------------------------------
The Mounds View City Council was called to order 1. Call to Order
by Mayor Links at 7:00 PM on Monday, May 11, 1987,
The Pledge of Allegiance was said. 2. Pledge of
Allegiance
MEMBERS PRESENT: Councilmembers Quick, Blanchard, 3. Roll Call
Wuori and Mayor Links.
It was noted Councilmember Hankner was absent.
ALSO PRESENT: City Attorney Meyers and Clerk/
Administrator Pauley.
Motion/Second: Wuori/Blanchard to approve the April 4. Approval of
27, 1987 minutes as presented. Minutes:
April 27, 1987
4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
There were no residents requests or comments from S. Residents
Requests
and
the floor. Comments from
the Floor
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reviewed the items on G. Approval of
the proposed consent agenda. He also reported he had
Consent Agenda
received a call from JLN, stating that the draft EIS
is not complete, and they anticipate it will be
available for the May 26, 1987 meeting.
Mayor Links asked that the address on Item A be
corrected to read 2800 T.H. 10.
Councilmember Quick asked that Item D be removed
from the consent agenda.
lotion/Second: Quick/Blanchard to approve the consent
agenda, as amended, and waive the reading of the
resolutions.
Motion Carried
4 ayes 0 nays
Mounds View City Council A
- --oRegular Meeting `
�------- -------------UN -
Motion/Second: Quick/Wuori to table Item D until May
26, 1987.
4 ayes 0 nays
Mayor Linke closed the regular meeting and opened the
public hearing at 7:05 P14.
Park and Recreation Director Saarion presented handouts
to the Council -And reviewed both the advantages and
disadvantages of locating the portable classroom to
the different park sites in the City. She explained
the Council has accepted an offer to purchase the
building for $1 from the school district, and the
purpose of the public hearing this evening is to decide
on which park to locate the facility at. She stated
the Park and Rec Commission recommends it be placed at
Random Park.
Director Saarion reviewed criteria the Council should
use in making their decision, to consider the design
and use of the par.'s., consider the recreational use
proposed for the facility to see if it matches the
park, consider the overall scheme of the city park
system and consider the philosophy of park development
in the City.
After reviewing the advantages and disadvantages of
the various City parks, and the present facilities
at each, Director Saarion stated she would recommend
the building be placed at Random Park.
Tom Foster, 2516 Ridge Lane, stated he had not received
any notice of this hearing. He stated he feels Random
Park is passive and he feels it is too small to add a
parking lot and building. He added that it lacks both
water and a toilet facility, and he does not want to
see a satellite placed there, and vandalism is not a
problem there because there is nothing there to vandalise.
Mr. Foster stated he feels a high intensity park is a
disadvantage to young children playing, and he also
recommended putting the building where vandalism is going
on, to give the people of that area something to be proud
of.
Charles Crooke, 5231 Stevens Drive, stated he agrees with
Mr. Foster's comments. Fie added that they had originally
asked for a fence around the park and got a berm instead,
and he does not want the building placed there.
May 11, 1987-
Page Two
(71
Motion Carried
Public Hearing:
Location of
Portable
Classroom
Building in a
City Park
144
Mounds View CityCouncil ; v PP
Ma 0 1,1987 Regular Meeting�D __Page1_Three
----- i-______'---------- -------
Councilmember Quick noted the Council had received a
® great deal of information tonight, and he would like
to hold over any action until the next meeting, giving
the Council an opportunity to research and discuss this
at the next agenda session.
Mayor Linke noted the building must be moved on May 12.
Ccuncilmember Quick suggested moving the building to a
central location and then moving it to the permanent
location once it has been agreed upon.
Councilmember Blanchard stated she does not appreciate
having everything brought to the Council at t'r_ last
minute, and the information should have been included
in the Council packet last week. She added they only
heard comments from citizens against locating the
building at Random Park, and she is not sure that that
is the place to put it.
Councilmember Wuori stated she agreed with Councilmember
Blanchard, and she needs time to consider the various
options.
Mayor Linke stated he is opposed to Random Park, for
reasons he has stated before, and he would prefer
Woodcrest Park, as a parking lot is already in, or City
Hall by the well house, which does not have a parking
lot there, but one could be installed.
Mr. Foster asked if any of the organizations mentioned
that would be using it had actually stated they would
like to use it.
Councilmember Quick replied there is a problem right
now with scheduling with the school district, and the
City gets bounced out very frequently.
Mayor Linke stated there is a definite need for this
building, and the problem is in deciding where to locate
it.
Richard Eimer, 5225 Skiba Drive, stated he feels the
City does not maintain equipment or property, once
they install it.
Mike Berry, 5237 Skiba Drive, stated he lives by Random
Park and he does not want any more people in the park.
Mayor Linke pointed out the area was always a park, and
home owners knew that when they moved to the area. Ile
added a park is for the use of the people of the
community.
Mayor Linke closed the public hearing and r^.opened the
regular meeting at 7:50 PM.
Mounds View City Council �q11 DMay 11, 1987'
Regular Meeting ii� s j iPP
V
Page Four
Motion/Second: Linke/Blanchard to have the portable
building moved to the well house location on the north
side of City Nall, with a final decision to be made in
two weeks, on May 26, 1987.
4 ayes 0 nays
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reviewed'the request for
a minor subdivision from Ted and Pamela Lautzenheiser.,
8121 Long Lake Road, and the request of Marvin Kelly,
2521 Sherwood Road, for a minor subdivision in connec-
tion with the Lautzenheiser's subdivision. Ile explained
the importance of approving both requests at the same
time, to insure the City does not create a land -locked
lot. Ile added the Planning Commission has reviewed
the requests and recommends approval.
Motion/Second: Quick/Wuori to approve Resolution
No. 2197, approving the minor subdivision of Ted and
Pamela Lautzenheiser, 8121 Long Lake Road, and Marvin
Kelly, 2521 Sherwood Road.
4 ayes 0 nays
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported Staff is
working with the property owners along County Road I.
Ile stated that if a property owner should refuse to
provide the City with the needed right-of-way, it
could place the City in a difficult position due to
time constraints, and he asked the Council. to authorize
the City Attorney to file for condemnation, if necessary.
Motion/Second: Quick/Blanchard to authorize the City
Attorney to file for condemnation of the needed
right-of-way for the reconstruction of County Road I,
should the City be unsuccessful in negotiating
acquisition of said right-of-way prior to June 1, 1987.
4 ayes 0-nays
Attorney Meyers advised that condemnation proceedings
would require the hiring of an appraiser. The Council
clarified that that would be within the authority of
the motion they had just passed.
Attorney Meyers reported that at the time of the
explosion last year, the City came into possession
of the pipeline, and Williams Pipeline Company
would like to have it moved to Neighborville,
Illinois, for further research. Williams Pipeline
has brought forth a motion, which will be heard on
June 5 by Judge Diana Murphy regarding the moving
of the pipe, and the City will have a counter-
IUM
r
Motion Carried
Consideration of
Minor Subdivision
Request - 8121
Long Lake Road
and 2521 Sher-
wood Road
Motion Carried
Consideratio'--
of Staff Meti.
Regarding
County Road I
Right -of -Way
Acquisition
Motion Carried
Report of
Attorney
Mounds View City Council I pp}} _l[ May 11, 1987
Regular Meeting 1 �r 6� -Page-Five
------------------------------------
�. motion against the moving of the pipe. lie added he
has notified the Court the City is ready to proceed
on the other issues.
Councilmember Quick asked that the Council be given
information for the next agenda session on the
advantages and disadvantages of placing the portable
building at Hillview Park, as that 'had not been
covered earlier in the evening.
Councilmember Blanchard had no report.
Councilmember Wuori had no report.
Mayor Linke stated there had been problems over the
weekend with flower vendors who had set uo along
Highway 10, and he asked Staff to check into it to
avoid future problems with vendors, specifically
flower and painting vendors.
Attorney Meyers stated the could possibly require
a public hearing before a permit is issued, and
he will check further into the ordinance.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley updated the Council on
the status of the pipeline safety act and the voting
on the bill. He added the NTSB has given the
impression they might be leaning more favorably
toward Mounds View in their report. He also reported
four sections of pipeline are being exposed in the
City now, in order to take readings, and if no
problems are found, they will rewrap the pipe and
rebury it.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported commercial fire
inspections have begun, and notices have been filed
against all the businesses that have been inspected.
He added they are negotiating with the Fire Department
to do the multi -family inspections for the summer,
until the new building inspector is up to speed.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley
been issued to Mid -American
clean up, and they have not
another notice will go out
reported a notice had
Auto 30 days ago to
responded as yet, and
now.
11. Reports of
Councilmembers:
Councilmember
Quick
Councilmember
Blanchard
Councilmember
Wuori
Mayor Linke
12. Report of
Clerk/
Administrator
Mounds View City Council Rg May 11, 1987
Regular Meeting U_ NAPP
IU VER
--Page-Six----
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported the City of New
Brighton had problems keeping up with water demand
over the weekend, and hooked into Mounds View's
system and used approximately 5 million gallons. He
added that Mounds View did not have problems keeping
up, and well #1 should be back in operation by next
weekend.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported, he had received
a phone call from Dave Schurpee, 2186 Lambert, who
would like to have a live band play in his yard for
a wedding reception later in the summer, from 4 to
8 PM, and wanting to know if it was alright.
It was the consensus of the Council that unless
nuisance occurs, it was alright, and they do
appreciate him contacting the City in advance.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported the reconstruction
of Long Lake Road has been on the county's list of
improvements for a long time, and it is now scheduled
as a priority B for 1988-89, and they would like
Williams Pipeline to replace the pipe before
construction begins.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reviewed the memo from
Public Works Foreman Rose regarding necessary repair
work to the air conditioning system at City Hall, �.
and reviewed the two bids received to do the work.
Motion/Second: Linke/Quick to approve the proposal
from Schwab-Vollhaber, Inc. to make the necessary
repairs to the air conditioning system, at a cost
not to exceed $2,950.00, with the funds to come
from the City Hall repair account.
4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Mayor Links asked that they also look at the heating
system and overall capacity of the air conditioning
system, as so many problems have been experienced.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported he had received
an application from Super America too late for place-
ment on the consent agenda, but they would like
approval of a license for gas sales ad non -intoxi-
cating off -sale Liquor. He added they have supplied
all the necessary information and bonds.
tt -' t May 11, 1987
Mounds View City Council t �� ;6 �p �A-' !°- a �' Y
f -� J. Page Seven
Regular Meeting �.yR�q j -L 4- S_ __-_
-�_- s __'G.- 6 �9
Motion/Second: Quick./Linke to approve a license for
gas sal—es-5-0 a non -intoxicating off -sale liquor
license for Super America.
4 ayes 0 nays
Motion Carried
Mayor Linke adjourned the meeting at 8:26 PM. 13. Adjournment
Respectfully submitted,
Donald F. Pauley
Clerk/Administrator
MEMO TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL '_6 "^ `
FROM: MARY SAARION, DIRECTOR
PARKS, RECREATION AND FORESTRY
® DATE: MAY 14, 1987
RE: FIGURES AS REQUESTED BY COUNCILMEMBE6 QUICK
Here are the potential costs for the location of the portable
building at the various park sites.
Greenfield Park
Moving .....................................$ 2,600
Foundation .. 3,240
Electricity (soccer area) .................. 1,000
(near courts) .................. 6,000
Sewer and Water 1,000
Parking available - 0 -
TOTAL ....................... $7,840 - $12,840
Groveland Park
Moving .....................................$ 2,600
Foundation 3,240
Electricity (side by side) ................. 1,500
(if remote) ...............$2,500 - $3,000
Sewer and water 500
® on street parking ..... - 0
TOTAL ......................$10,340 - 10,840
Woodcrest Park.
Moving..........I..........................$ 2,600
Foundation 3,240
Electricity (side by side) ........... $1,500 - $2,000
(if remote) .................... 5,000
Sewer and water 500
Parking available - 0 -
TOTAL ...................... $12,840 - $13,340
Random Park
Moving .....................................$ 2,600
Foundation ................................. 3,240
Electricity ................................ 1,000
Parking (class 5) ................... 600
Sewer and water ............................ 1,000
TOTAL.......................... $ 8,440
C
:WC
City Hall Park
Moving .....................................$ 2,600 �.
Foundation ................................. 3,240
Electricity ................................ 1,000
Parking (Asphalt) ..........................
(Class 5) .......................... 600
Sewer and water ............................ 1,000
TOTAL..................... M 440 -
Hillview Park (considering proposed site plan for 1988-89)
Moving .....................................$ 2,600
Foundation ................................. 3,240
Electricity (tandom) ....................... 1,500
Sewer and water ............................ 500
Parking - off street (asphalt) .............
Class 5.................................... 600
TOTAL .....................$0,440
Oakwood Park
Moving .....................................$ 2,600
Foundation ................ I................ 3,240
Electricity ................................ 2,200
On street parking .......................... - 0 -
Sewer and water ............................ 500 .:;.
TOTAL.........................$ 8,540
Silver view Park
Moving .....................................$ 2,600
Foundation ................................. 3,240
Electricity ................................ 6,000
Sewer and water ............................ 2,000
Parking available .......................... - 0 -
TOTAL.............. :.......... M,840
Lambert Park
Moving .....................................$ 2,600
Foundation ................................. 3,240
Electricity ................................ 5,000
Sewer and water ............................ 500
Parking .................................... 600
TOTAL .......................511,940
IIILLVIEW PARK
Advantages
® None in my estimation.
Disadvantages
1. Hillview already has a park shelter building.
2. Hillview is small and packs in slot of play fields, thus
allowing little room for additional permanent structures.
3. Currently has a parking problem.
4. The park is also near homes.
5. A drainage ditch runs through the mid -section of the park
making alternate plans difficult.
Long Lake Road is scheduled for renovation in 1988-89. It is hoped
that at this time the Hillview Shelter could be moved nearer to Long
Lake Road with off-street diagonal parking available (requiring
® fill). This would eliminate the current problem of parking and
negating the need for cars driving into the park as is currently
the practice. At this time, the shelter would be placed on a
permanent foundation with permanent entrances and landscaping.
E
6"V-1 t, �
,.:r*r
h01 Cey r'"'r-
-1.
m
�IIJXA5
.
a ,/�f ,?i%ram ��r / r�
� 7%U
MEMO TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: CLERK-ADMINISTRATO
DATE: MAY 13, 1987 M?
SUBJECT: AMOCO OIL COMPANY CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
2800 Trunk Highway 10
Amoco Oil Company has requested a Conditonal Use Permit to
construct a self-service gas station/convenience store and
attached car wash on the southwest corner of Trunk Highway
10 and Silver Lake Road where Northeast Marine is
currently located. Attached with this memorandum are copies of
the initial Staff Report dated February 18, 1987, a Supple-
mentary Staff Report dated February 27, 1987, the Traffic and Air
Quality Study Reports dated March 27, 1987 and the resolution
ultimately adopted by the Mounds View Planning Commission. It
should be pointed out that the applicant has met all of the
requirements placed on this project by the Planning Commission.
At the May 6th Planning Commission Meeting the Chairperson voted
for the project although voicing concern regarding this type of
use at that .location adn Planning Commisson Member 2olner voted
against the project on the basis that she felt the use was
inappropriate at that site. Attached is a copy of minutes from
the May 6th Planning Commission Meeting relating to this issue.
Staff would be happy to respond to any questions the Council
might have regarding this project in preparation for the Public
Hearing at 7:05 p.m. on May 26th. Further, Staff recommends
approval of the project.
DFP/mjs
Attachments:
kcif� W uouodg �Iew
PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW DATE: February 18, 1987
(Agenda Session)
AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: 3
H_� r
0J CASE NUMBER: 196-86
APPLICANT: Amoco Oil Company (Wagner Corp.)
PROPOSED REQUEST: Applicant requests development review
approval to construct a 36' by 44' gas station/conven-
W'.ence store and attached car wash.
j LOCATION OF REQUEST: 2800 Trunk Highway 10
(Northeast Marine Site)
SITE SIZE: 0.59 acres - 25,500 square feet
LOT DEPTH AND WIDTII: 170 feet by 1.50 feet
.� EXISTING ZONING: B-3, Highway Business District
CONTIGUOUS LAND USE: R-1 and R-3 on the North Side
r of Highway 10
1�
(� R-3, R-4 and B-2 on the South
l Side of Highway 10
rM�
CONFORMANCE TO COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN: The
proposed development is located in Planning District
12 of the Comprehensive Land Use Plan. The Comprehen-
sive Land Use Plan proposes medium density residential
use for this site.
ZONING CONFORMANCE TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The existing
zoning does not conform to the Comprehensive Plan.
STAFF REPORT
CASE NO. 196-86
I. ATTACHMENTS
PAGE. TWO OF THREE.
1. Boundary and Topographic Survey Received 2/11/87
2. Preliminary Site Plan Received 2/11/87
3. Grading Plan Received 2/11/8"
4. Landscape Plan Received 2/11/87
5. Potential Future Development of the Lot Directly West of
the Proposed Amoco Station as a Retail Center, Automotive
Center, Office Building, Restaurant, and Housing Units
II. PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS
State Law now states that when the Comprehensive Land Use
Plan does not conform with the zoning on a piece of properly,
the City can only enforce the Zoning Code.
Approvals are needed from the Minnesota Department of
Transportation and Ramsey County for access to their road
right-of-way. Approval from Rice Creek Watershed District is
not necessary because the proposed commercial development is
less than 2-1/2 acres.
1. Setbacks - Proposed structures, fencing, paving and
cur meet minimum setback requirements.
2. Access - Applicant proposes two access points. One
from T.H. 10 and the other from Silver Lake Road. The
access points satisfy City requirements.
3. Parkin - City Code requires 13 total parking spaces (9
parking spaces for the retail store, plus 4 parking
.spaces for the motor fuel station). No additional
parking spaces are required for the car wash.
Applicant proposes 16 parking spaces (12 parking spaces
at the pump, 3 regular spaces and 1 handicapped parking
space). The proposed parking spaces satisfy City Code
requirements.
4. Magazining or Stacking Space - City Code 40.18, Subd.
D(2)b, states that magazining or stacking space must be
available for car washes to accommodate the number of
vehicles which can be washed during a maximum 30 minute
period and shall be subject to the approval of the City
Engineer. The applicant has not submitted stacking
space calculations yet. There appears to be space for
5 cars to wait for the car wash.
STAFF REPORT
CASE NO. 196-86
PAGE THREE, OF THREE
5. Additional Code Re uirements - City Code 40.18, Subd.
D(2), and C ty Code 0.18, Subd. D(3), are additional
requirements that the Developer must satisfy. These
conditions are satisfied with the exception of the
public hearing for the conditional use permit.
6. Minor Subdivision - If the proposed minor subdivision
meets your approval, the Developer will submit a
Surveyor's Certificate. If the minor subdivision meets
your approval, a public hearing will be held at a City
Council meeting.
III. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval contingent upon receiving
acceptable stacking information.
12/81
.15.Z
4i
IV
� I jj-
Section 7, Pg. 3
kj
14AM
;I m
el
MU�
Bou4ry X Tpoyrophk Survey
Wagna.r Corporation
Scale 1"r6,10
441
' � Iq.E `+wit 'r�45 .b �'_ •�
. j
I � ;� :^ rs' - • 1. ; rl' � 9,Iq 11 iz''/,y A
Icre.tral,.m.q,rnr.frt f ��d�/frl¢.'�Y tt��e�� Ih0UEDSVIEiL,rlf�
•11rel.. lrenrr.+vrrnl k� e 11�11�?� _.
hi•IY
G4tAt45
' Ncltrl l...wy nrep r1+11M ....y... r•.r—.n 1.y..
' Nvry1.�Lwpr—,+n.nA 11.A,l nnwl3r .�.
` I)'JALS AYnhN'r. nt rryx•r, 0'I p'FMrd IrY [/y'
4'Al,rm IHn' n.4Jnd lrM S...y�...Mrlb Vrn.r 11.
t .nY. hd. ] •• rI' M...rl. Oe1 A U.. _i'_ h1
>I!�i 4�ulw IrNernlnt ratrr, or n,•en, it o:,"vnmo4 � eny
knr,e..r dt+air•�nu1d r!•rine roNr wN pfe Arer .d h oM1d n•
tn.n.In.."vr'ty b firM krohd Oy IN mwp+eil uldr/y 11•.�avn,:... u.:..-1_, rr 1ri�1
rmrpn,l ryrm 10 ronr/ry</rro.
P L•r" "/ Nrrryld ps/vr/y
pL'
z
r•20'
DNAIUGE ANALY&8
Jrr. nru ,•rnw ww�
w.MMP.L
••.rrw.�µwr..wnnw n•
l •.9�'
l �FIAN
M1000 0� co'uR _
MNY 9 • YY[# turf A
R- YWDtY�p. Yt
�L ID '150.001
n Ir
\ F +
I '
�� '•�`\ •(fix �\rV;-EF
I `
I'/L 98.73'
n\ \s
•
re
0�
�E'
a 4NTMALf
Q..
bVOK
J.
AUM fmptj
if•
ALYM. /Aida rmnl.
K•
ALYM p,g. pftl!(
6.
AUK "AQ*4*
�.
AUM f"Mot Lp•f.
d,
ALYM WIMppW; 1'AAMGf.
e.
ALYM LgM4*Aa MM#PAMW
Q.
00"4W MOTAL OWK t FAA.IW
'f.
L�lNAIL, OLA/f
�•
V41 TLIMY "CP MA f*
J.
p46 CA A"
0
War f ))P&
MONT -
�j
„P�t-DG EI.�Vl�TION�i_
0
0
n
a,&. TA*GCfO PDbt
FA.Nr 4K..Act 6NA"l
volwotap NA1401:6Lf
TA74'"P 4.16dr ME OA%
ri'u c0 <AOL• I.137,
wAT R`(ML
k IV4 V�tCTVCA: uuoulT
l*CF 42. FLOTINI, of
6Ead%
vjf 4 94 OAtk4, c i TICS,
4r ANC►29 MT4 PM
s+Fb. iM4.
LIGHT FIXTURE DETAIL
NO SCALE
O 1 8'0 BOLT CIRCLE
4-7/6` 0 HDLES
11' 0 BOLT CIRCLE
I VV 6X Zit' SLOT?
LIGHT BASE DETAIL
NO SCALE _
fioRiH STAR ENGINEERING cotismTAMING
12610 •66ih Amw North ft~h. Mnwou 16N2 %121 sq2612
6AFPl.O l.lE1P T•7 BE CONS1iLVL� &p
C'F TL??TG7 ? +.gE/ TIN ppY fs19 L
r F I P? Tr Pt1%NICS
15 .�T i� T.T-.
V x/V7..T,
Al
paNco 3amm
WF!r— 4�iiT�C14
i
MEMO TO: PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: CLERK-ADMINrSTRATO
DATE: FEBRUARY 27, 1987
SUBJECT: AMOCO OIL COMPANY (WAGNER CORPORATION) PROPOSAL,
2800 TRUNK HIGHWAY 10, CASE NO. 196-86
Pursuant to your direction at the February 18th Agenda
Session of the Planning Commission, Staff has reviewed
specific items with respect to the proposal and wishes to
report on our findings.
1) Storm Water Ponding - The ponding proposed by the
developer. is adequate pursuant to the requirements
of City Codes. Any provisions for special handling
regarding spillage of gasoline, oil, etc. which
might ultimately drain into the ponds is not
specifically addressed in the Code and a determina-
tion by the Planning Commission would need to be
made to require a design which would allow for
handling of these items.
2) City Forester Rick Wriskey reviewed the landscape
plan proposed for the site and makes the following
recommendations:
' a. Substitute "Marshall's" Ash for "Summit" Ash.
The Marshall's seem to grow better in this area
and have a more developed crown and will have
fewer seeds, if any.
b. Plant an additional Marshall's Ash on the south-
east property line approximately 15 feet north
of the plantings buffering Silver Lake Road from
the site.
c. Change the size of the trees to be planted from
5 to 6 foot balled and burlapped to 2 to 2 1/2
inch diameter balled and bur.lapped. The size of
trees specified are too small for the location
proposed and more than likely would not survive
an extreme winter during the first few years of
their growth.
d. Change the rock mulch from 5/8 to 3/4 inch multi
colored stone to a brown or grey trap of 3/4
to 1 inch. Rick feels that fewer problems
related to loose stones will result from this
modification.
3) Sand traps - Building Inspector Brian Hoffman has
advised that sandtraps are required as part of the
project and will need to meet building code
provisions prior to the building permit being
issued.
PLANNING COMMISSION
PAGE TWO
FEBRUARY 27, 1987
4) Lighting - Conversations with Steve Thatcher
indicated that the lighting proposed by the
developer was determined by him to meet the
requirements of City Code.
5) Screenine and Bermit� The developer has indicated
a willingness to modify the proposed screening and
berming within reasonable limits to meet the
concerns of the Planning Commission. I would
suggest that you indicate to him your concerns in
detail and attempt to negotiate an acceptable
compromise on this item.
6) Traffic - Staff suggests that if traffic is a
concern of the Planning Commission, that a study be
contracted for to determine what impacts the
proposed development might have on traffic
conditions at that intersection.
7) Sanitary See+er and taater Service - Staff has
determined that adequate sanitary sewer and water
service is available to the site.
8) Si na e - Staff has determined that the signage will
meet the requirements of City Code.
9) Stacking - Municipal Code requires that stacking be
provided equal to the number of cars that• could be
washed by the facility during a 30 minute period.
Representatives of Amoco Oil have advised that the
facility has been designed to provide a maximum
usage of 12 washes per 30 minutes. Staff is
currently reviewing the site plan to address this
issue and will be able to respond regarding this
matter at the March 4th meeting.
10) The Planning Commission requested that I contact
Attorney Mark Karney and discuss with him what the
City's options might be regarding regulation of
hours and for controlling development if a develop-
ment district is created. Attorney Karney has
indicated that based on his review of the proposal
and other projects in the area, it would not seem
reasonable for the City to place a Limitation on the
operating hours of this facility as it more than
likely will not have any more impact on residential
property within the vicinity of the facility that
other service stations operating on a 24 hour basis
within the City of Mounds View. With respect to )
PLANNING COMMISSION
PAGE THREE
FEBRUARY 27, 1987
creation of a development district, Attorney Karney
has indicated that since the proposal for the Amoco
Oil Station is already before the City, this
opportunity is no .longer an option unless this
project does not go through and action is taken to
create a development district before any other
projects are proposed.
Should the Planning Commission have any further questions
regarding this matter, Staff will attempt to respond to them
in the most expeditious manner possible.
DFP/mjs
SHORT-ELLIOTT-HENDRICKSON, INC.
11mr® pia CONSULTING ENGINEERS
{�'� Si. PAUL, MINNESOTA • CIIIPMWAFAUS, WIXONSIN
March 27, 1987 'RE: MOUNDS VIEW HIGHWAY 10
SILVER LAKE ROAD AMOCO
SERVICE STATION
SEH FILE NO. 84049
Mr. Don Pauley
City Administrator Mounds view
2401 Highway 10
Moundsview, MN 55112
Dear Mr. Pauley:
Enclosed are two memorandums relating to the proposed Amoco
service station at the corner of Highway 10 and Silver Lake Road.
The first memo addressees traffic and the second memo addresses
air quality.
We reviewed the site plan for traffic last week, noted our
concerns and met with the developer. The developer's engineer
understood our concerns and may make some modifications to the
proposed service station.
The second memorandum relates to air quality impacts from the
service station, primarily with respect to the adjacent
developments. We made a preliminary evaluation but felt it best
to utilize the services of David Breslau Associates to provide a
more detailed analysis. Their memorandum provides the technical
analysis of both bulk delivery to the station and individual
automobile pumping at the station.
I believe that the two memorandums will provide the information
requested relative to traffic and air quality. If you have any
questions or need any additional information, please feel free to
call on us.
Sincerely
Glen VanWormer
Chief Transportation Engineer
® GVW/cmh
Enclosure
700 GOPHER IIUII DING•771 FAST II111 E CANADA ROAD -St. PAUI, MINNESOTA 55117•PI[ONE (6171 4RJ-0171
i
D-
I
MEMORANDUM
TO: FILE
FROM: GLEN VANWORMER
DATE: MARCH 23, 1987
SUBJECT: MOUNDS VIEW HIGHWAY 10 SILVER LAKE ROAD
AMOCO PROPOSAL GAS STATION TRAFFIC REVIEW
The proposed Amoco service station in the southwest corner of the
intersection of highway 10 and Silver Lake Road will not generate
any significant increase in traffic volume. Approximately
seventy five percent of the trips to the service station will
come from traffic already on Highway 10 or Silver Lake Road. The
remaining twenty five percent will be special trips to the
service station for gasoline or other items. This volume is
extremely low relative to the existing volumes on Highway 10 and
Silver Lake Road.
A review of the access from the service station to the roadways
reveals some concerns. Access to Highway 10 will be in the
middle of a right turn lane. This is undesirable, although other
examples of similar drives are located along Highway 10. In
addition, the angle of the entrance is oriented to the north to
provide favorable access for southbound traffic. This will
reduce the amount of slowdown by decelerating traffic in the turn
lane headed for the service station. However, it creates some
problems for outbound traffic in that they have to make more than
a ninety degree turn. Concerns exist that traffic might be
inclined to travel the wrong way on Highway 10, headlights will
be facing slightly north into the line of southbound traffic and
the right turn can't be made by a truck with out utilizing both
Highway 10 lanes. The driveway also is partially in front of the
adjacent property. The applicant will have to obtain a permit
from the Minnesota Department of Transportation and it is likely
that they will force him to place the driveway on his own
property or obtain some type of a cross easement with the
adjacent property. The angles and other items will also have to
be modified.
Access to Silver Lake Road should not create any significant
problems. Access out of the station may be delayed if the backup
of traffic on Silver Lake Road for the signal on Highway 10
extends beyond the entrance. This will create an internal
traffic problem for the Amoco station but will not affect the
traffic on Silver Lake Road. Movements into the station should
not create any problems.
The drawing indicates a future driveway to the property to the
northwest. This will cause traffic to go from Silver Lake Road
thru the gas station past the gas pump areas to the northerly
property. Depending upon the use of the property, this could
create some traffic problems within the site.
The service station shows only four parking spaces. With a
minimum of one and possibly two spaces utilized for employees,
parking will be minimal for non gasoline customers. However,
recognizing the size of the store, it is not likely that it will
generate many non -gasoline 'trips. In addition, -most service
stations of this type have customers parking immediately in front
of the service station. The applicant may wish to review his
parking configuration and amount.
The flow of traffic through the car wash is counter to normal
American practice where the motorist tends to keep to the right.
The car wash has traffic flowing to the left from Silver Lake
Road to reach the car wash. This, combined with movements from
the gas pumps to the exits and to the car wash will create a
number of conflicts. It would be logical to consider reversing
the flow of traffic through the car wash so that traffic entering
and exiting from the car wash is lined up with the "keep right"
concepts of traffic near the entrance. The reversed flow of
traffic will also provide additional storage for vehicles waiting
to enter the car wash.
The placement of the air hose and vacuum is also likely to
interfere with the flow of vehicles through the car wash. ('^
Consideration should be given to relocate it. V -
With the proposed driveways, buildings and gas pumps, it will be
necessary for all gas transport trucks to enter from southbound
Highway 10. The applicant should consider the direction of
approach of his vehicles from the refinery and perhaps he could
relocate his tanks or provide specific directions for his
transport trucks.
The applicant should consider the , various traffic concerns
expressed above and should obtain permits from the Minnesota
Department of Transportation and Ramsey County for these two
entrances.
GVW/cmh
devid breeleu dbassociates, incorporated
1313 Sthstreet s.e.. su,te322 . m-nneapohe,mn 55414 . tetephone 612.331.4571
26 March 1987
MEMORANDUM
TOe Robert Byers
FROM: David Breslau I
RE: Evaluation of Air Quality Impacts from Proposed Service Station
located southeiiat of the intersection of TH 10 and Silver Lake Road
in Mounds View, Minnesota
A schematic of the service station facility evaluated here is shown in Exhibit
1. The existing Rindercare building on the north side of TH 10 is shown
schematically on the 'drawing, which is not to scale. TH 10 at this loction is
a four -lane divided highway facility with an pm. peak hour traffic volume of
approximate 3000 vehicles per hour.
® Primary sources for air pollutant emissions from the service station are the
filling of underground tanks, the filling of vehicle tanks at the pumps,
possible spillage, and exhaust and evaporative emissions associated with
vehicles as they use the facility. Nhile these emissions include
hydrocarbons, nitrogen oxides, sulphur oxides, and carbon monoxide, it is
anticipated that hydrocarbon emissions will be the primary contributor to any
pollutant concentrations near the site.
Hydrocarbon emissions associated with the filling of the underground tanks
will likely be the major source at the site. These loading losses are due to
vapors leaking into the air as they are displaced by incoming fuel. Methods
for calculating these losses have been developed by the U.B. Environmental
Protection Agency and have been used here to estimate the amount of
hydrocarbon emissions which can be expected.
While storage for approximately 18,000 gallons appears to be provided on the
site, deliveries will be made only periodically. Assuming that the tanks are
splash loaded at the rate of 1000 gallons per hour, hydrocarbon emissions are
estimated to be approximately 400 grams/hour. This will occur only
periodically, depending upon sales and requirements of the service station.
The normal servicing of vehicles at the station is anticipated to yield
emissions well below this value, since it would take one vehicle per minute
taking on 16 gallons to equal this flow. Normal emissions associated with
fueling at the pumps is estimated to be lees than 100 grams/hour during peak
® activity hours.
The relative impact of these emissions can be evaluated In the light of
vehicle emission which already occur near the site (primarily from vehicles
travelling along TH 10). While exact values for Hydrocarbon emission are not
available for Minnesota vehicles, A value of 10 grams/mile is estimated to
represent the mix of automobiles and trucks which travel TH 10. This assumes
hydrocarbon emission to be only 20t of carbon monoxide emissins and Is based
upon the MOHILE3 emissions model developed by the U.S. EPA.
Since pollutant concentrations along the roadway at intersections can be
attributed to free -flowing as well as queueing traffic, it is estimated that
approximately 1900 grams/hour are emitted near the intersection of TH 10 with
Silver Lake Road, due to the vehicles travelling along these roadways. Thus,
normal peak, hour emissions at the site are considerably higher than what can
be expected from storage tank filling or normal operations at the station.
The primary effect of hydrocarbon emissions is the creation of ozone rather
than direct health effects caused by carbon monoxide or other toxic
pollutants. An ongoing Study along TH 10 to the south of the study site has
shown carbon monoxide levels to be well below state ambient air quality
standards. Since the metropolitan area is no longer designated a non -
attainment area for ozone, strict controls on hydrocarbon emissions are not
required on service stations or other minor sources evaporative emissions. r,
Contact with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Indicates that no problems
have been encountered with service stations of the type considered here in
terms of toxic or odor emissions. It is possible that an accidental spill
could create emissions for a short time that may create detectable odors.
However, it is expected that the facility will be kept clean and that any
spills would be treated immediately in accordance with Minnesota Pollution
Control Agency procedures.
Should problems with emissions from the facility occur in the future, methods
are available for controlling the evaporative emissions from storage tank
loading.
EXHIBIT 1
7..
Kindercare
facility
wl AM, [IAA[ MYY. p
A
S
g
APPROXIMATE SITE LOCATION - NOT TO SCALE
C
MEMO TO: MAYOR AND CITY COON IL
FROM: CLERK -ADMINISTRATOR
DATE: MAY 13, 1987
SUBJECT: DAILEY KNOLLS PRELIMINARY PLAT
The referenced subject is scheduled for a Public Hearing, at 7:10
p.m. on May 26, 1987. Attached -please find copies of the Staff
Memorandum with attachments submitted to the Planning Commission
reviewing this project as well as the resolution adopted by the
Planning Commission recommending approval by the City Council.
Should Council have any questions with respect to this item,
Staff would be pleased to answer them in preparation for the
Public Hearing. Staff does feel that this plat is acceptable and
recommends its approval.
DFP/mjs
Attachments:
MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION
It PESOLUTION NO. 183-87
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION OF RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL
REGARDING MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING CASE NO. 204-87,
DAILEY KNOLLS PRELIMINARY PLAT
WHEREAS, Dailey Home's, Inc. has requested approval
of a Preliminary Plat subdividing the east half of Lot 7,
Lot 8, and the last half of Lot 9, into 3 lots for
development of 3 zero lot line duplexes; and
WHEREAS, the City staff has conducted a Development
Review of the proposal and determined that the preliminary
plat is in compliance with all applicable City codes; and
WHEREAS, the Mounds View Planning Commission
reviewed the Preliminary Plat and concurred with the
conclusions reached during the Development Review.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds
View Planning Commission recommends approval of the
Dailey Knolls Preliminary Plat.
Adopted this 6th day of May, 1987.
ATTEST:
(SEAL)
C
MEMO TO: PLANNING COMMISSION \
FROM: CLERK -ADMINISTRATOR , I
i
DATE: APRIL 9, 1987
SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT DAILEY KNOLLS
Attached please find a copy of the Preliminary Plat for
Dailey Knolls filed by Mr. Howatd Thorsen of Dailey Homes,
Inc., 8510 Central Avenue H.E., Blaine on March 25, 1987.
This plat has a rather extensive history with the City of
Mounds View,. -in that it was oriyinally filed in 1977,
recommended for approval by the Planning Commission on
January 10, 1979, copy of minutes attached, and approved by
the City Council on April 9 of 1979 along with rezoning of
the property to the R-2 designation which will allow the
development currently proposed by Mr. Thorsen, namely zero
lot line duplexes on each of these three lots. This item is
again before you as Mr. Thorsen did not submit a final plat
for approval within the six month time frame required by
City Ordinances after approval in 1979 and, therefore,
requires that the plat be reconsidered from the beginning.
Staff has conducted a Development Review of this project on
the morning of April 9, 1987 and determined that the plat
itself is within the requirements of City Ordinances with
the only concerns relating to the maintenance of public
utilities and the storm water detention pond.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the Preliminary Plat as
presented.
DFP/mjs
PROCEEDINGS OF THE PLANNING CONNISSION
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA
A regular meeting of the hounds View Planning Commission was called
to order by Chairperson Haake at 7:35 PM on January 10, 1979 at the
Hounds View City Hall, 2401 Kighway 10, Mounds View, Hinnesota 55112.
Meabera Present:
Chairperson Haake
Commission Member Blanchard
Commission Member Burmeister
Commission Member Fedor
Commission Member Foss
Commission Member Glazer
Commission Member Quan
Also Present:
Building and Zoning Official Rose
Councilmember Forsl
Chairperson Heake asked for any corrections to the December 13, 1978
meeting minutes.
Mayor McCarty asked that the vording of the November 29, 1978 minutes be
changed regarding low income housing. He stated that he was trying to
a the point that frame homes, especially rental ones, it is particularly
d to get the owner to make repairs once they are built and occupied,
' n particular when they are federally funded.
Chairperson Haake stated that the minutes of the December 13, 1978 mre.:ng
were approved'as read.
DAILFY HCHES•- MAJOR SUBDIVISION - 7555 GROVELAND ROAD
Official Rose reported that the Planning Commission first reviewed the
request in late 1977, at which time Mr. Thorson ownea just the east half
of lot 9 and all of lot 8. Mr. Thorson at that time requested three
duplex lots which were substandard in width, and the Planning Commission
denied the request for rezoning and the subdivision because the lots did
not meet the size requirements. The City Council then reviewed the plat,
after Mr. Thorson stated he would purchase 32' to bring the lots closer
to code. The City Council tabled the reqqueat at that time since there
were not public improvements and set an informal meeting for February 28,
1978. It was resolved at that meeting that if someone wanted to develop,
they would provide their own services. Official Rose added that soil
tests were also taken at that time which founpeat at
great depths on
some of the property, and economically top• The Cy
Council also informed Mr. Thorson at that time that he would have to bring
his lots up to coder i.e., lot frontages, for approval.
ficial Rose reported that Mr. Thorson now has a Qurchase agreement for
e east half of lot 7, which would create two 100 lots fronting Silver
rake Road and one 198' lot. He added that Mr. Thorson has also proposed
a means for servicing his land for development.
January 10, 1979
Page 2
Official Rose stated that the rezoning had been approved for the
9her lots in this area and, further, that Mr. Thorson's lots now
at the minimum size requirements. He added that there is an
xisting utility line which passes through Lot 2, which would have
to be moved unless it could be built around. The easements are adequate
for drainage and public improvements, and there is a culvert located above
lot 7 which drains into the Kraus Anderson property, and there is also
existing drainage. Official Rose also stated that development controls
would include a bond or cash a"crow'for the improvement, plantings,
building elevations and proposed gradirgs and a bond or cash escrow for
the lot development.
Commission Member Burmeister asked if Mr. Thorson would still have two
curb cuts and a circular driveway. Official Rose replied this :--jld.
with the front of the lots draining to Silver Lake Road.
Commission Member Glazer asked what the statue was of the drainage on the
east aide of Silver Lake Road on the Kraus Anderson property. Official
Rose replied that any existing drainageways would have to be left open or
have a conduit placed over them. Commission Member Glazer also asked where
the water goes from Silver Lake Road. Official Rose replied that Silver
Lake Road drains to either side of the road and the natural drainage flow
is in a southeasterly direction, and pointed out on a map the flow of the
drainage.
Mr. Thorson stated the only thing he had to add to what Official Rose had
`?ready explained was that he would be putting in one fire hydrant on
lver Lake Road. Official Rose explained that Staff and the Fire Chief
4liave required that if Mr. Thorson developed along Silver Lake Road that
a hydrant was needed.
Commission Member Burmeister pointed out that the subdivision was denied
on November 9, 1977. yet Mr. Thorson is presently building a home there now.
Official Rose explained that he has the right to pull one Permit for one
lot, and that Mr. Thorson has placed the home on the lot to allow for
future development. Official Rose added that the attorney has determined
that an applicant has the legal ri ht to pull a permit for one home as
long as it did not hamper future development of the total property.
Leonard Kramer stated he was representing his parents who own lots 1 and 2.
Mr. Kramer stated that his parents had been at the meeting last February
supporting the installation of services by the City. He added that there
were only a few people in opposition to having the City put the services
in at that time. Mr. Kramer explained that he and his parents have nothing
against Dailey Homes since he feels the development would be in both their
beet interest and the City's, but if Mr. Thorson puts his own services in,
it could cost them up to another $10,000 to put their services in.
Chairperson Ranks asked if Mr. Kramer would like all the property owners to
put in services now. Mr. Kramer replied that he would like all of them to
get involved now. He added that the water installation would not be too
costly but the sanitary sewer would be.
a. Kramer stated she was afraid that if Mr. Thorson put his own services
and she put her own service in, and since they are at different eleva-
tions, they could not connect and would thus leave the middle property
owners out. She added, though, that the middle property owners had been
against having the services put in since their lots were not buildable.
January 10, 1919 Page 3
®rlficial Rose explained that originally, when Mr. Thorson requested the
�., bdivision, it was obvious that public improvements were needed, which is
why the Council held the public hearing and had soil testa taken. What
came out of that meeting was that the Cuuncil left if up to the individuals
that if they wanted to build, they wouid have to service their property
themselves. He added that a petition with 35 percent of the property
owners signatures had not been submitted, as required, for the City to
consider putting in the services
Mr. Thorson stated that the feasibility study which was done stated that
it was not feasible to have the City put the services in since not all
the lots were accessible, and thus would not be cost efficient to put
them in.
Mr. Kramer stated that he did not believe the lots were undevelopable.
He explained that while they might be now, he felt they would be consi-
dered developable in the future.
Chairperson Haake stated she could nee both sides, since Mr. Thorson
is ready to develop his three lots and is willing to put his services in,
yet the Kramers want the whole system put in.
Official Rose advised that if the Kramers would like the City to put
the services in, they get up a petition with the required 35 percent.
Mrs. Kramer replied that she didn't think she could get the required 35
(')rcent.
®�iommission Member Foss stated that the issue had been discussed several
times the previous year and that the C;.uncil had turned do%n patting in
the services because of the property owners who did not feel they would
value from it.
Official Rose stated that the other option open to the Kramers would be
to service their lots off Groveland, which would require ejectors.
He also stated that for the City to put service in, it was estimated to
be approximately $58 per frontage foot for both sewer and water.
Mr. Kramer stated he didn't feel he could put the services in for the
price the City could. Chairperson Haake asked him if he had worked out
the cost if all six property owners put the improvements in. ::r. Kramer
replied that he hadn't but he still felt it would be higher than if the
City put them in.
Mr. Thorson pointed out that he had paid for a professional engineer,
who calculated actual expenses, not estimates. He also stated that he
had told the Kramers they could hook into his system. He also pointed
out that if he put his own services in, he would not be harming the
Kramers at all, or any other property owner.
Official Rose explained that there are two ways of having public improve-
.z:,gnts put in, either by submitting a petition of 35 percent for Council
2siderati.on and approval, or the Council, on its own by unanimous vote,
n order the project in. He added that if they cannot get the required 35
itercent but still have several owners interested, the Council oan recon-
:der the issue if they desire, further recommendinq that they attend
the public hearing in which the City Council would reconsider the plat.
January 10, 1979
Page 4
�Kramer stated he does not want to delay Mr. Thorson's development
t does want to facilitate their own services. He asked that the Planning
commission delay action until their next meeting to allow more time to
work something out.
Commission Member Burmeister pointed out that sewer services are not in
the Planning Commission's realm but rather in the Councils, and that they
legallycannot
specified,nd ui
that the PlanningCummission must act on the rell the quest.
ante
uest
Mr. Kramer stated that it is the responsibility of the Planning Commission
to provide or insure the orderly development of the community. Commission
Member Burmeister replied that Mr. Thorson has met all the requirements
and that he has gbne through boththe Planning Commission and Cis) .JUncll
already, and the Planning Commission docan't have any ground to stand on
for holding him up. She recommended that the Kramers come in and see the
Council.
Official Roso pointed out that Mr. Thorson was directed by the Council
to create code conforming lots and service his own property if he wanted
to develop, and he has met those requirements. He added that he did not
see ny reason where the issue, but the City eCouncil ncould consider g Commission athe talternrong grounds for tabling
alternatives.
Chairperson Haake stated she felt the services should be put in the most
Conomical way but that Mr. Thorson has conformed to all the requirements
d met everything the Council has requested of him.
Commission Member Glazer stated he £el" the City Council wo:?a rely OIL
the expertise of the engineer and Building Official.
il
CommissionobMr. Thhorre n repliedhow
that therer. Thorson
is ioasoil problemhandling
thethe proo-
perty he will be developing He stated that it is buildable, and onthe
large lot, he will be building the home on good soil and putting a garden
in on the questionable area.
Commission Member Fedor stated he felt the requestshould go on to the
Council. He also stated he was curious that if Mr. Thorson could afford
to service his lots, wiry the other property owners could not Pfford to
also.
Mr. Kramer replied that they would have to tie into the system elsewhere,
which would significantly increase their cost, lie stated that he had
estimated the coat to be $16,000 to service the two lots with just se:'_r.
Commission Member Fedor pointed out that with the Kramers 232' on Silver
Lake Road, the City cost of sewer and water would be $13,400, and allowing
for a 10 percent increase In cost this year, would be roughly $15,000 for
the City.
fission Member Fosa stated he would be in favor of recommending approval j
the plat to the City Council, unless the City could act promptly to i
'ring
Cwand
water
down
the
whole
ingpointed
moneysoil
out,
on though,
testhat
s
the ityhad turned indown last ycar after spend .
P"•
January 10, 1979 Page 5
fission Member Burmeister stated she agreed that it should go onto the
uncil.
Commission Member Blanchard also agreed that it should go on to the Council
She added that Mr. Thorson has done everything he has been asked to.
Commission Member rnuan stated that he could not give a good comment since
he was confused by the issue ana did not have enough information to make
sense.
Chairperson Haake stated that the agreed the issue should go on to the Coun-
cil since Hr. Thorson had met all the requirements. She also recommended
that the Kramers get a petition. of 35 percent to the Council rigi" ..wry.
Official Rose reported that if the issue goes on to the Council, a public
hearing will be held and the people notified. Official Rose pointed out
on a map where the lots in question are and where sewer and water services
are in the area.
Hr. Thorson pointed out that the City Council had directed him to prepare
a study, which he did, and the Council approved it and sent him back to
the Planning Commission because of the lot size changes.
Councilmember Foralund stated that at the time of
0near, Mr. Tobiason stated he had tried to give his
e Council had said at that time that developers
rvices.
airperson Haake recommended that the notices for
be sent to every one owning frontage on ilver Lake
and County Road I westside.
last
and
ma
i
Commission Member Glazer questioned why Staff stated R-2 development would
be better than R-1 on Silver Lake Road and questioned why the :mpact of
heavy traffic would be worse for R-1 than R-2. Chairperson Haake replied
that the R-2 would be used for a buffer zone.
the public hearing
land to the City,
should put in their
DWI
the public hearinfftt
Road between Br son
HSP (Foss -Burmeister) to recommend approval of the preliminary plat of
Dailey Homes, dated December .15, 1978, 7555 Groveland Road, with the
rezoning from R-1 to R-2 of lots 1, 2 and 3, with lot 4 remaining R-1,
subject to entering into a development agreement with the City.
Commission Member Quan stated he was abstaining from the vote as he could
not make a fair judgement.
Commission Member Foss stated that he would recommend to the Council to
also consider the request of the Kramers and other parties on the north
four lots, to reconsider bring sewer and water services to the remaining
property along Silver Lake Road up to County Road I.
- SECTIONS
T'�-irperson Haake reported that Official Rose had prepared the ordinance
i ibions to Section 40.07, Subd, D. 8, f and j, as requested by the
Pranning Commission.
ayes
abstain
I
MEMO TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: MARY SAARION, DIRECTOR PbPARKS, RECREATION AND FORESTRY I'1�
DATE: MAY 13, 1987
RE: CABLE EQUIPMENT REQUESTS
Please review the attached cable budget. Cable committee member
Jerry Skelly is well versed in the field of public cable TV as he is
employed by the St. Paul School District in the cable department.
He has a grgat amount of experience in purchasing equipment and has
made an inventory of needs for the City of Mounds View. Currently,
he is acquiring two bids on such equipment to an approximate total
of $5,825.' Although the bids are not available at this time, the
information should be available at the next agenda session.
MS/sl
MEMO TO: DON BRAGER, CITY FINANCE DIRECTOR
FROM: MAR; SAARION, DIRECTOR
PARKS, RECREATION AND FORESTRY
DATE: MAY 13, 1987
RE: 1907 CABLE COMMITTEE BUDGET
Equipment Approximate Cost
1. Chambers studio equipment including
portable lights, high quality microphones
intercom system, tripods, dolly, mic mixers,
monitor bank, etc. $3,000 - 3,500
2. Cam -Recorder 1,300 - 1,500
3. 19" TV monitor receiver 350
4. Cart 125
5. Repeater VCR 350
$ 5,825
Production Costs:
1. Council meetings (3 staff at $8.00/hour
x 5 hours x 24 times) $ 9,175
2. special productions including shooting,
editing, etc.
TOTAL $151000
N
rz-�-5
�\ MEMO TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: CLERK -ADMINISTRATOR
DATE: MAY 13, 1987
SUBJECT: FIRE INSPECTIONS
As I indicated during my Administrative Report at the May llth
Council Meeting, deficiencies are being noted in some of the
multiple dwelling units located in the City of Mounds View as it
relates to fire safety matters. In view of the fact that our new
Building Official began his duties on May llth and it is unlikely
that he would be able to assume full involvement in fire
inspections during the next 90 days, it would be my desire that
the City contract with the Fire Department to undertake those
duties during that time frame in order that fire inspections may
be coordinated with the activities of our Housing Inspector.
With that position in mind, I recently met with the Fire
Department to discuss with them this possibility and they
indicated an interest in doing so with the understanding that the
Department bill the City monthly for these inspection services as
a supplementary budget item with the permit fees collected by the
Department reducing the total amount due. Attached is an Addendum
to the Fire Inspection Protocol entered into between both parties
in August of last year with a provision that the agreement may be
cancelled by unilateral action of either party upon 10 days
written notice.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff would recomend Council approve Amendment
No. 1 to t,ie re Inspection Protocol.
DFP/mjs
Attachment:
t
U
AMENDMENT NO. 1
FIRE INSPECTION PROTOCOL
WHEREAS, it is the desire of the City of Mounds View to
contract with the Spring Lake Park -Blaine -Mounds View Fire
Department to provide certain fire inspection services on a
interim basis; and
WHEREAS, the spring Lake Park -Blaine -Mounds View Fire
Department has met with the City of Mounds View and agreed to the
request of the City.
NOW, THEREFORE, the following provisions of Amendment No. 1
to the Fire Inspection Protocol are hereby agreed to.
1. The.:Fire Department will inspect all occupancies
in areas covered by the uniform Fire Code except
multiple dwellings.
2. Multiple dwellings will be inspected under the folowing
conditions:
® a. Requested by City Staff.
b. Requested by Occupant/Manager/Owner of building.
c. Deficiency noted on a fire call to the building.
The City shall be notified of all inspections undertaken
as a result of 2.b. or 2.c. as listed above and the
reasons for those inspections prior to said inspection.
3. An analysis of the current city ordinance relating to
fire prevention' 'inspection will be made and suggested
amendments, if any, will be forwarded to the Clerk -
Administrator for further discussion.
4. The Fire Department will submit periodic reports to the
Clerk -Administrator as to the progress being made,
problems encountered, etc.
5. The Fire Department will bill the City monthly for the
inspection services listed above as a supplemental fire
budget item. Permit fees collected by the Fire Depart-
ment will be deducted from the total amount due.
AMENDMENT NO. 1
FIRE INSPECTION PROTOCOL,
PAGE TWO
6. This Amendment No. I to the Fire Inspection Protocol
shall be cancellable by unilateral action of either
party upon 10 days written notice.
Accepted:
City of Mounds View
By:
Date:
Spring Lake Park Fire Dept.,
Inc.
By:
Date
TO: Mayor 6 Council
FROM: Finance Director -Treasurer Brager
DATE: May 14, 1987
RE: CONSIDERATION OF INCREASING THE DEDUCTIBLE, ON THE
CITY'S LIABILITY COVERAGES
Our insurance company, The League of Minnesota Cities
Insurance Trust, offers several deductible options. These
options have the potential to save the City some money on its
insurance premiums. These options, however, are not without
some risk to the City.
The League of Minnesota Cities offers many deductible
options. There are two options which I believe the City
should consider. The first is a deductible of $5,000 per
occurrence on all .liability insurance coverages with an annual
aggregate limit of $50,000. If this option is chosen a credit
of $8,000 would be given on the annual premium. The second
option is a $10,000 deductible per occurrence with an annual
aggregate limit of $50,000. This option would result in a
credit of $11,000 on the annual premium. These deductibles
would apply to all liability insurance coverages presently
carried by the City. These include: general liability, which
presently has a deductible of $1,000; public officials
liability, which presently has a deductible of $2,500 and
automobile insurance liability, which presently has no
deductible. Loss adjustment expense is included in the
deductible amount.
To illustrate how the deductible would work assume that the
City chose a $5,000 deductible option. In the event of a
claim being made against the liability insurance coverages the
insurance company would investigate and make settlement if the
City is proven to be negligent as they have done in the past.
The City would be responsible for loss adjustment expense plus
claims payment of up to $5,000 per claim. The annual
aggregate limit of $50,000 means that the City is potentially
responsible for ten deductibles of $5,000 in a year. The
attached deductible analysis, prepared by Charles Clysdale,
the City's insurance agent•, indicates that over a six year
period the cost of claims $5,000 or less was $21,269 or an
average of $3,545 per year. The average number of claims per
year was five. The risk that the City takes is that it will
have ten claims of $5,000 in one year and pay out $50,000.
The City's loss experience indicates that it is not likely
that this will happen.
May 14, 1987
Page 'l
The deductible analysis projects that, if the same loss
experience continues for the future, and if the premium
savings currently available continues, the City could safely
assume a deductible of $5,000 and expect a net savings in
insurance costs over the long term. These savings over a five
year period are projected to, be $14,775. Should one of these
deductible options be chosen it should be a long term
decision, i.e. it should be chosen for a long period of time
sng
and not just one year. The reason
for
r theslongthat termchoInianya
high deductible only will pay o
given year the amount paid under this deductible option could
exceed the savings, however, over the long term our claims
experience suggests that there will be a savings.
I recommend that the City choose the $5,000 deductible option.
A fund should be established for insurance claims. Into the
fund would be paid the annual savings resulting from taking a
deductible option. Expenses of the fund would be only claims
and loss adjustment expenses. If the amount in the fund is
not sufficient to pay claims and loss adjustment expenses a
tranfer de
funds
wouldobedable etooitawould orepay contingency. the contingency account.
RECOMMENDATION: Choose the $5,000 deductible option for
savings of $8,000. Establish an insurance fund for the
payment of insurance claims and loss adjustment expenses.
DB/ds
Attachment: Maquire Agency Inc. letter of April 30, 1987
Ctimles E. Clysdale, CPCU
Wallace H. Russell, CPCU, CLU
,Roaor E. Carlson, CLU
V,toodis R. Dale, CPCU
Philip Kenney. CLU
'Cold Krinte, CPCU
Wd Undaren, CIC
.ayne N. Mann
Paul A. Myers
it
April 30, 1987
Maguire
Agency Inc.
Don Brager
City elf Moundsview
2401 Highway 10
Moundsview, MN 55112
Dear Don:
P.O. Bnx 64316
St. Paul, MN 55164
655 Nnrlh Fairview
St. Paul, MN 55104
612 645-5751
1 8DD 642.4408 MN
1 800 328.9393 Other States
Attached you will find my brief analysis of the options that
are available to you in choosing deductibles for the city's
insurance program. I would recommend that you consider the
$5,000 deductible and take advantage of the $8,000 annual
premiums savings. I have tried to analyze your losses for
the last six years and compare them to potential premiums
savings to the future. After you have reviewed this, please
give me a call so that we may discuss this further and make
any necessary changes.
ery truly yoours,
6ll_l-
Charles E. Clysdale
1 CC:lh
DEDANA.CHU
a
Insurance and Risk Management Professionals
DEDUCTIBLE ANALYSIS
CITY OF MOUNDSVIEW
Y'
A) Facts regarding premiums and losses
1)
Property and Casualty Premiums $72,129
2)
Deductible Options
Deductible Annual. Aggregate Credit I of Premium
$ 1,O00 None $ 5,000 6.9%
5,000 50,000 8,000 11.09%
10,000 50,000 11,000 15.25%
4.
3)
Summary of 6 years Loss History (5-1-80 to 5-1-87)
1) Total Claims 30
2) Claims Closed Without Pay Payment 10
3) Claims Less Than $5,000 Deductible 18
4) Cost of Claims Less than $5,000 $21,269 plus Loss
Adjusting Expense
5) Average Value of vapai.d
Cz
Claims for 6 years
(21.2694) $3,545
6) Average Number of Claims
per year (3016) 5
B) Conclusions:
1)
If the same loss experience continues for the future, and
if:-_;
the projected savings continues, the City can probably
safely assume a deductible of $5,000.00 on property and
casualty losses and expect a net savings in insurance cost
over the long term.`'
2)
Projected Cost Savings for 5 Years
A) Projected Premium Savings
$8,000 x 5 = $40,000
B) Projected Loss to be Paid
1) Average loss paid $3,545
2) Estimated loss adjustment
expense per year 11500
$5,045x5= $25,225
C) Projected Savings $14,775
DEDANA.CHU
GENERAL LIABILITY
Claim Number
Date of Loss
---
8/11/81
---
8/13/81
---
4/16/82
351-727355
11/11/82
351-728730
1/8/83
351-747188
11/9/83
351-772982
10/19/84
351-776384
11/23/84
351-788379
5/9/85
AUTOMOBILE
Claim Number
Date of Loss
---
6/29/80
---
4/10/81
---
1/31/82
---
3/31/82
I
I
Type
H.I.
B.I.
P.D.
P.D.
P.D.
P.D.
P.D.
P.D.
P.D.
P.D.
CITY OF 14OUNDEVIEW
SUMMARY OF LOSSES
5/80 - 5/86
Description
Police Assault
Amount Paid 7
$ 78.00
77,869.00 �a•F6
CWP r`
Water damage, Simon's
Liquor
CW?
Water damage, D. Veenstra
CWP
}E {
Water damage, J.
tsyY
Quick
240.00
Property Damage including
vandalism
CWP
Water damage, C. Piehowski
1,051.00
Underground damage, Cathy
<^ a
Roth
1,450.00
0
TOTAL GENERAL LIABILITY
$80,759.00
A
�u
Type Description Amount Paid
Collision -------- $ 392.30
Comp. -------- 131.65
Collision -------- 55.65
Collision -------- 121.00
(� PAGE T=
AUTOMOBILE (CONTINUED)
-Claim Number Date of Loss Type Description Amount Paid
351-724717 11./7/82 H.I. Collision with pedestrian, -
L. Siluk $11, 600.00
351-73811E 5/27/83 P.D. Glass breakage 165.41
351-777174 12/17/83 Collision Vehicle hit while parked 1,180.00
351-752462 1/9/84 P.D. Collision with vehicle behind 530.12
351-787819 6/11/85 P.D. Collision with other object CWP
TOTAL AUTOMOBILE$14,176.13 9/76 �
INLAND MARINE
Claim Number Date of Loss Type Description Amount Paid
--- 7/1/81 P.D. Radio damaged $ 200.00
351-862120 9/19/83 P.D. Roll over 903.54
• ss
351-778143 1/23/85 P.D.--------- 1,780.00
TOTAL INLAND MARINE $ 2,883.54 Rif!
PROPERTY
Claim Number Date of Loss Type Description Amount Paid
--- 7/2/80 Vandalism ------- $ CWP
--- 8/8/80 Wind ------- 475.00
--- 12/12/81 Vandalism 527.00
--- 1/28/82 Vandalism ------- 257.35
--- 2/17/82 Vandalism ------- • 61.00
TOTAL PROPERTY $ 1,320.35 "d o7fi
WORKER COMPENSATION
Claim Number
Date of Loss
Type
Description
---
4/20/81
Med.
Strained thumb
---
7/14/80
Med.
Stepped on nail
---
3.0/13/81
Med.
Injured back loading trailer
---
10/30/81
Med.
Kicked in stomach and back
---
3/22/82
Med.
Lifting air hammer, injured
back
351-716501
5/10/82
Med.
Cat bit hand, K. Berke
351-718371
6/28/82
Med.
Fell on nail and hur hand,
J. Bowman
351-723035
6/28/82
Med.
Bruised toe, D. Matanowski
351-718178
7/12/82
Med.
Cut on face, J. Bowman
351-720745
7/19/82
Med.
Cut hand, J. Mihalow
351-722326
9/29/82
Med.
Pulled back muscle, S. Glysina
351-731994
12/28/82
Med.
Fell, E. Grabowski
---
7/29/83
Med.
Wood chip in left eye
---
8/9/83
Med.
Back injury pulling weeds
---
8/15/83
Med.
Bruised leg
---
8/25/83
Med.
Back injury jumping fence
TOTAL WORKER. COMPENSATION
PAGE THREE
Amount Paid
$ 1,283.00
24.00
CWP
1,657.20
1,280.00
88.00
105.00
98.00
107.00
30.00
602.40
58.00
55.00
3,680.78
107.50
378.00
$9,553.88
f
TO: Mayor & Council
FROM: Finance Director -Treasurer Brager
DATE: May 14, 1987
RE: 1998 BUDGET CALENDAR
Pursuant to Section 7.04 of the Charter a budget calendar must
be adopted by resolution. Attached is a proposed calendar for
your consideration.
DB/ds
RESOLUTION NO. 2198
i CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE 1987 BUDGET CALENDAR
WHEREAS, the City Charter prescribes the requirements
for a Budget Calendar under 7.04; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IS RESOLVED Lhat the Council adopts
the following calendar for preparation of the 1988 Budget:
Week
of July 6, 1987
- Department heads first round budget
meetings with Finance Director
20
July 1987
summary
Staff of
ofdeparmentalsbudgets
first draft of
to Council
20
July 1987
- Staff submits review of adequacy of
license 6 permit fees to Council
20
July 1987
- Staff submits revenue estimates to
Council
Week
of July 20
- Department heads second round
budget hearings with Clerk -
Administrator 6 Finance Director
03
August 1987
- Staff submits summary sheets of
second draft of departmental
budgets to Council
17
August 1987
- Staff submits utility budget and
rate recommendations to Council
08
September 1987
- Proposed Budget submitted to
Council
14 September 1987 - Budget Nearing
No later than
10 October 1987 - Council finalize budget and adopt
budget resolutions and tax levy
RESOLUTION NO. 2198
Page Two
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Mounds View adopts the above calendar for the 1987
Budget process.
Adopted this 26th day of May, 1987.
ATTEST:
Mayor
(SEAL)
Clerk -Administrator
C:.
bATG RI'I'Y-Uurv, r11/811
PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNA PPROVt
!CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA
Regular Meeting
April 27, 1987
Mounds View City Hall
2401 Hwy. 10, Mounds View, MN 55112
----------------------------------------------------------------
The Mounds View City Council. was called to order by 1. Call to
Mayor Links at'7:00 PM on Monday, April 27, 1987. Order
The Pledge of Allegiance was said. 2. Pledge of
Allegiance
MEMBERS PRESENT: Councilmelrbers Wuori, Hankner, Quick, 3. Roll Call
Blanchard and Mayor Linke.
ALSO PRESENT: City Attorney Meyers, Clerk/Admini-
strator Pauley.
Motion/Second: Blanchard/Quick, to approve the
April 13, 1987 minutes as presented.
1 5 ayes 0 nays
4. Approval of
Minutes:
April 13, 1987
There were no residents requests or comments from 5
the floor.
Finance Director Brager made a presentation of the
proposed insurance coverage for the City, and he
reviewed what the City is presently carrying.
Charles Clydsdale, an insurance agent, presented the
Council with copies of the proposal for coverage and
reviewed it with them.
Finance Director Brager explained the proposed
premium is approximately $10,000 under budget, and he
recommended the Council award the insurance coverage
to the McGuire Agency, pursuant to the proposal
submitted, in the amount of $123,339.
Counci.lmember Ilankner stated she was concerned that
the $10,000 which was saved at this point would be
eaten up with comparable worth and workers comp, in
additional premiums.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley stated that while the
premiums may go up, due to salary changes And so forth,
he felt very strongly that they would not increase over
Motion Carried
Residents
Requests and
Comments from
the Floor
Mounds View City Council April 27, 1987
Regular Meeting Page Two
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
the $10,000 that was being saved at this time.
Motion/Second: Quick/Blanchard to award placement
of nsurance coverages to McGuire Agency, pursuant
to the proposal for coverages submitted, for a
total premium of $123,339.
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reviewed the' items on the 6. Approval of
consent agenda. Consent Agenda
Notion/Second: Ilankner/Wuori to approve the consent
agenda, as presented, and waive the reading of the
resolutions.
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Mayor Linke explained that when the second -reading 7. Confirm Second
had been held on this ordinance on April 13, there Reading and
had been only three Councilmembers present, so they Adoption of
were going to confirm the motion at this time, to ordinance No.
ensure a 4/5 vote. 418
Councilmember Wuori - aye
Councilmember Ilankner - aye
Councilmember Quick - aye
Councilmember Blanchard - aye
Mayor Linke - aye Motion Carried
Clerk/Administrator Pauley stated Staff would B. Consideration
recommend hiring James T. Tobias as building of Staff Memo
official for the City, and lie reviewed his memo Regarding Hiring
of April 23, 1987 to the Council. of Building
Official
Councilmember Quick asked just what a building
official does.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley explained that under
State statute, he is charged with the enforcement
of all building nodes, and will make rulings with
respect to compliance and will make code interpre-
tations. Ile will be the. building inspector, fire
inspector, and supervise the housing inspector,
and work with Staff on zoning issues.
Councilmember Ilankner asked if Mr. Tobias had had
an opportunity to meet with othor staff.
Mounds View City Council
April 27, 1987
Regular Meeting
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Page Three
Clerk/Administrator Pauley replied he had been given
the opportunity but had turned it down, as he was too
busy with his present job to spend any more time at
Mounds View City [call.
Councilmember Quick asked if this would have any
affect on the comparable worth study. Clerk/Administra-
tor Pauley replied this is a benchmark position, and he
feels it is very close.
Councilmember Blanchard asked if there Would be a job
description ready before he is to start on May 11.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley replied he will try his best
to do it, but he is very busy working on the County
Road I project and meeting with Lhe residents involved
in that. He added he did give Mr. Tobias complete
information on what to expect with this job.
Councilmember Hankner stated the Council has given
Mr. Pauley an indication of what the Council expects,
and she would like to see the job criteria and how it
is met, before any increases in salary are given.
Motion/Second: Quick/Wuori to approve the hiring of
James T. Tobias as building official commencing on
May 11, 1987 at a salary of $27,000 per year to be
increased by $1,000 after the third month of the
probationary period and $2,000 after the sixth month
of the probationary period, with the increases to be
contingent upon job performance criteria and an
evaluation against that criteria.
Motion Carried
5 ayes 0 nays
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reviewed the memo of
9. Consideration of
April 27, 1987 from Public Works Foreman Rose
Staff Memo
Regarding
regarding architectural/engineering service for
Maintenance
public works addition project No. 87-3. lie stated
Garage Addition
the City is not required under law to award
professional services contracts to the low bidder,
be best served
and he stated he feels the City would
in awarding the project to the second lowest bidder,
Short -Elliott -Hendrickson. lie explained their bid
was $1,900 higher than the lowest bid, but due to
having used them before, and their familiarity with
the City, and considering Staff shortages and so
forth, they feel SEii can accomplish the job with
be
little Staff guidance, and they feel SEH would
capable of saving the City at least the $1,900.
Mounds View City Council April 27, 1967
Regular Meeting Page Four
Mayor Linke asked specifically what work would be done .
by whichever firm was awarded the project.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley stated the primary work
would be in preparing blueprints, plans and specs and
bid documents.
Mayor Linke stated Staff has laid out what they are
looking for, and he feels Staff will be involved, no
matter who is chosen. He acknowledged SEH has done
work for the City in the past, but this is a different
type of work.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley stated he would hope that
whatever firm the City goes with would familiarize
themselves with the City's system. He explained a new
firm would need to spend more time doing that, and SEH
has worked on it and is familiar with the City's
system. He added they are currently using old style
equipment in the water department, and will some day
be installing new computerized equipment, and when
that is done, many things will have to be relocated,
and SEH would be able to take that into consideration
in their work for the City.
Mayor Linke asked what they would have to do with
architectual services. C
Clerk/Administrator Pauley replied the City is not
experts in that field, and they have made drawings
based on minimal skill levels, and they need a
professional to come through and finish it up, and
one who must be able to look at it critically and
evaluate it and make recommendations.
Councilmember Hankner stated that based on`past
experience, using a new firm has often cost more in
the long run. She stated she would be very comfortable
going with SEH, as they are very familiar with the
operation and Staff, and there is a good sense of
trust with SEH. She added she does not feel the City
can afford to gamble on using someone new, when the
cost difference is $1,900, and a good chance that SEH
can save them that amount in the long run.
Motion/Second: Hankner/Blanchard to approve the award
for the architectual/engineering services for the
public works garage to SEH in the amount not to exceed
$13,800.
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Mounds View City Council
Regular Meeting
------------------------
^ Clerk/Administrator Pauley explained a recommendation
i! was received from the Park and Rec Commission to place
the donated portable classroom building at Random
Park, as well as schedule a public hearing on it, and
the Council at the last agenda session had requested
the item be placed on the agenda for this evening for
discussion. tie added they anticipate the building will
have to be moved on May 15.
April 27, 1987
Page Five
--------------
10. Discussion on
Placement of
Donated Porta
Classroom
Building in
Random Park
Mayor Linke stated he has been adament against putting
it at Random Park due to the use of the facility, as
he feels it is more of a community use, whereas Random
Park is a local, immediate neighborhood park, and he
does not feel this type of facility is warranted for
that location, and lie would prefer to see it at Greenfield
Park.
Councilmember Pankner stated she feels Random Park is a
community park, and it is located in the southern portion
of the City, where park development has not occurred as
much as it has in other parts of the City. She stated
she would prefer going with a public hearing or just
agreeing to place it at Random Park, rather than the
Council selecting another site.
Mayor Linke stated he does not feel Random Park is large
enough to handle the building and its use, and they
would have to install a parking area, which would have
to be located in the ponding area.
Councilmember Hankner stated she would like to get more
input on the matter and what the residents would like,
as she does not feel the Council alone should make the
decision.
Councilmember Blanchard stated she does not feel Random
Park is the place for this building, as it will have a
good deal of evening use. She added she feels strongly
that they should have a public hearing on the matter.
Councilmember Quick stated that in considering the cost
of utilities and the problem of vandalism, while he had.
originally thought Silver view Park would be a good
location, he now feels it would be best used at Random
Park. lie stated the parking could be facilitated with
the use of timbers and Class 5, and the use of the
building could be contained to the inside, and the
utilities would cost less there. He added that while
vandalism is a growing problem throughout the City,
Random Park has a very low vandalism rate. Ile also
pointed out that neighborhood is changing considerably,
with many of the older residents moving on to retirement
areas and younger families with small children moving in.
He also pointed out that park needs another shelter for
the Tiny Tots program.
April 27, 1987
Mounds View City Council page Six
Regular Meeting
----------------------------------
-------------------------------------
Councilmember Wuori stated she feels this isn't a natural
site, but it is a logical site, and she doesn't feel the
building usage would be that high, and she believes
Random Park would be a good location for the portable
classroom to he moved to.
I:ot.ion/second:. Rankner/Quick to set a public hearing for
May ll, 1987 at 7:05 PM, on the site location of the
portable classroom.
• Motion Carried
5 ayes 0 nays
Clerk/Administrator Pauley clarified that the notice
would be worded that the hearing would be a general
discussion on the location of the portable classroom
building in a City park.
Attorney Meyers reported he had attended an NTSB 11. Report of
evidentiary hearing with Clerk/Administrator Pauley y
on April 23, on the draft of the proposed finding
of fact, and all. parties were there. Fie added the
City introduced records showing there was a problem
with corrosion protection going back to 1973.
Reports of --
Councilmember Wuori had no report. 12. Councilmember...
Councilmember
Wuori
Councilmember Rankrer discussed her frustrations Councilmember
gankner
with what is occurring in the Legislature at this
time concerning budgets and the fact that no one
wants their taxes to increase, but at the same time
they are not willing to see a cut in services.
She added that she hopes to see a good resident
participation when the Council works on the budget
for next year.
Councilmember
Councilmember Quick had no report. Quick
Councilmember Blanchard reported she had received
phone calls from residents regarding a helicopter
that was charging people for rides, operating frcm
the parking lot at Loose Ends, a few weekends ago,
and she stated that while there is not a City
ordinance against it, she was concerned if the City
would have any liability in the case of an accident.
Attorney Meyers explained the City would be in more
danger of liability if they authorized it, which they
do not.
'Mounds View City Council
Regular Meeting
---------------------------------------------------
Councilmember Blanchard stated she understands the
helicopter will be back this weekend, once again
giving rides.
Attorney Meyers stated there may be liability on the
property owners part, and they should make sure they
have adequate liability insurance.
Mayor Links directed Clerk/Administrator Pauley to
contact the FAA, as well as the owners of Loose Ends.
Mayor Linke reminded everyone that Clean -Up Day is
scheduled for May 2, and identification will be
required to leave anything.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported Public Works has
been televising sanitary and storm sewers in the City
and found the line on Fairchild between Ardan Avenue
and County Road J to be 2/3 full of sand and other
material, and it was necessary to spend $1,600 for
special equipment for the jet router, and the grouting
and repair work on that section of line will amount to
$2,500. He added they will be working on it this week.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley asked authorization to
' hire a temporary worker for the task of performing
softball field maintenance, and other requested work.
Motion/Second: Blanchard/Wuori to hire Andrew Gray
as a park maintenance worker, effective May 4, 1967
until August 5, 1987, at the rate of $5.50 per hour,
with the funds to come from account 100-360-4020.
5 ayes 0 nays
Mayor Linke adjourned the meeting at 8:22 PM
Re4pe4fully submitted,
Clerk/Admi
April 27, 1987
Page Seven
Mayor Linke
13. Report of
Clerk/
Administrator
Motion Carried
14. Adjournment