HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packets - 1987/12/14■
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
DECEMBER 14, 1987
7:00 p.m.
A G E N D A
1. Call. to Order
2. Pledge of Allegiance
3. Roll Call - Blanchard, Wuori, Quick, Hankner, Linke
4. Presentation of "Buy -A -Board" Program by Pinewood School
Playground Committee and Consideration of Resolution No.
2271
5. Approval of Minutes: November 23, 1987
Regular Meeting
(Received in 12-07-87 Packet)
6. Residents Requests and Comments From The Floor
--------------------------------------------------------
CITIZENS: BEFORE SPEAKING PLEASE GIVE YOUR FULL NAME
AND ADDRESS FOR THE MINUTES
i--------------------------------------------------•-----
7. Approval of Consent Agenda
ITEM A. Approve Partial Payment of $67,165.74 to
Cottonwood Construction for Public Works Garage
Addition
ITEM S. Authorize Advertisement of Public Works
Director/City Engineer Position
ITEM C. Adopt Resolution No. 2265 Approving Minor
Subdivisions for Simon T. Simon, 7821 Groveland
Road, Mounds View Planning Case No. 228-87
ITEM D. Approve Hiring of Temporary Replacement for
Accounting Clerk for a Period of Not More than
90 Days at a Rate Not to Exceed $13.00 Per Hour
ITEM E. Set Public Hearing for 7:05 p.m., December 28,
1987 to Consider Ordinance No. 433 Amending
Ordinance No. 359 Vacating a Portion of St.
Stephen Street and Drainage Easement
ITEM F. Approve Issuance of Silver View Plaza
Certificate of Occupancy
ITEM G. Set Public Hearing for 7:10 p.m., December 28,
1987 for Conditional Use Permit for Oversized
Accessory Building, Odas Newton, 8319 Groveland
Road
AGENDA
PAGE TWO
DECEMBER 14, 1987
ITEM H. Adopt Resolution No. 2270 Approving Just and
Correct Claims Against City Funds
ITEM I. Licenses for Approval
General - Expires 6/30/88
Berry Construction - New
Construc-All Corporation - New
Coronado Stone - New
Jim Dickey Remodeling - New
Everest Construction Company - New
Donald Karpinski - New
Master Home Improvements - New
Minnesota Exteriors - New
Excavating - Expires 6/30/88
Glenn Rehbein Excavating, Inc. - New
Heating and Air Conditioning - Expires 6/30/88
Ferraro Heating, Inc. - new
Unique Air, Inc. - New
Boxing - Expires 11/11/88
Kobra Enterprises - New
Used Jfuto Sales - Expires 12/31/88
Kevin Mullins - Renewal
Gasoline Stations - Expires 12/31/88
Neico Corporation (M. V. Food Shop) - Renewal
Brooks Superettes, Inc.- Renewal
The Kunz Oil Company - (Highway 10K) Renewal
The Kunz Oil Company - (Mounds View K) P.en.
Clark Oil & Refining Company - Renewal
SuperAmerica - Renewal
Non-Intoxicatinq Malt Liquor Off -Sale - Ex
12/31/88
Brooks Superette - Renewal
Country Club Market - Rene,ial
Tom Thumb - 2408 Cty. Rd. I - Renewal
Tom Thumb - Knollwood - Renewal
Non-Intoxicatinq Malt Liquor On -Sale - Exp.
12-31-B8
Bel -Rae Ballroom - Renewal
Bowling Alley - Expires 12/31/88
Mermaid, Inc. - Renewal
® AGENDA
PF.GE THREE
.-,,4MBER 14, 1987
Amusement Devices - Expires 12/31/88
American Amusement Arcades - Renewal
- Loose Ends
- Mermaid, Inc-
- POW s
8. Consideration of Final Actions on Mounds View Business
Park
a. Approval of Contract for Private Redevelopment
b. Approval of Development Agreement No. 87-81
c. Approval o. Resolution No. 2273 Providing the
Issuance and Public Sale of $6,000,000 Taxable
General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds, Series 1988A
of the City of Mounds View, Minnesota
d. Table Consideration of Bids for Public Improvements
to January I' - 1988
®� 9. Consideration of Wetland Alteration Permit and
Preliminary Plat for Greenfield Estates
10. Remove from Table and Cons.' -nation of Sewer and Water
Contractors License for Schuicies Plumbing
11. Approve Resolution No. 2268 Authorizing Budget Transfers
for 1987 Salary Adjustments
12. Approve Resolution No. 2269 Approving Extension of A
Conditional Use Permit for Kunz Oil Company, 2901
Highway 10
13. Approve Agreement Between Twin City Testing and the City
of Mounds View for Storage of Pipe Sections at a Cost of
$240,00 Per Month
14. Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance No. 431
Amending the Municipal Code of Mounds View By Amending
Chapter 40 Entitled, "Zoning"
15. Approve Change Orders to Public Works Garage Addition
Contract in the Amount of $3,245 per Recommendation of
Architect Dated November 25, 1987
16. Report of Attorney
17. Report of Councilmembers: Blanchard,
Wuori, Quick,
Hankner,
AGENDA
PAGE FOUR
DECEMBER 14, 1987
18. Report of Administrator
19. Adjournment
awl
Cli
RESOLUTION NO. 2271
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE EFFORTS OF THE PINEWOOD SCHOOL
PLAYGROUND COMMITTEE
WHEREAS, the students, faculty and parents of Pinewood School
have entered into a united effort to construct a new playground
at Pinewood School; and
WHEREAS, these efforts have included the participation of all
parties in the design, of the playground facility during a day
long "Design Day"; and
WHEREAS. efforts are now being undertaken to raise funds for
the construction of the playground through a "Buy A Board
Campaign" and secure volunteers for the construction of the play-
ground in May of 1988 or suppliers of equipment to use during
construction; and
WHEREAS, the strength of our nation and our current form of
government comes from the participation of all of our nation's
citizens; and
WHEREAS, the activities of the Pinewood Playground Committee
exemplify the goals of our nation's founders to encourage the
rarticipation of everyone in seeking a better society; and
WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Mounds View City Council
to encourage and support the efforts of the Pinewood Playground
Committee.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the
City of Mounds View on behalf of the residents of the City of
Mounds View offer its wholehearted support and endorsement of
the efforts of the Pinewood Playground Committee to accomplish
the community -wide financing and construction of a playground
facility at Pinewood School.
ATTEST:
(SEAL)
Adopted this 14th day of December, 1987.
Mayor
Clerk -Administrator
CONSENT AGENDA
DECEMBER 14, 1987
The Consent Agenda is a technique designed to expedite
handling of routine and miscellaneous official business of
the City Council. The entire agenda may be adopted by the
Council in one motion. The motion for adoption is non -
debatable and must receive unanimous approval. By request
of any individual Councilmember, an item can be removed from
the Consent Agenda and placed upon the Regular Agenda for
debate.
ITEM A. Approve Partial Payment of $67,165.74 to
Cottonwood Construction for Public Works Garage
Addition
ITEM B. Authorize Advertisement of Public Works
Director/City Engineer Position
ITEM C. Adopt Resolution No. 2265 Approving Minor
Subdivisions for Simon T. Simon, 7821 Groveland
Road, Mounds View Planning Case No. 228-87
ITEM D. Approve Hiring of Temporary Replacement for
Accounting Clerk for a Period of Not More than
\ 90 Days at a Rate Not to Exceed $13.00 Per Hour
ITEM E. Set Public Hearing for 7:05 p.m., December 28,
1987 to Consider Ordinance No. 433 Amending
Ordinance No. 359 Vacating a Portion of St.
Stephen Street and Drainage Easement
ITEM F. Approve Issuance of Silver View Plaza
Certificate of Occupancy
ITEM G. Set• Public Hearing for 7:10 p.m., December 28,
1987 for Conditional Use Permit for Oversized
Accessory Building, Odas Newton, 8319 Groveland
Road
ITEM H. Adopt Resolution No. 2270 Approving Just and
Correct Claims Against City Funds
ITEM I. Licenses for Approval
General - Expires 6/30/88
Berry Construction - New
Construc-All Corporation - New
Coronado Stone - New
Jim Dickey Remodeling - New
Everest Construction Company - New
Donald Karpinski - New
Master Home Improvements - New
Minnesota Exteriors - New
Excavating - Expires 6/30/88
Glenn Rehbein Excavating, Inc. - New
CONSENT AGENDA
PAGE TWO
DECEMBER 14, 1987
Heating and Air Conditioning - Expires 6Z30Z88
Ferraro Heating, Inc. - new
Unique Air, Inc. - New
Boxing - Expires 11,11/88
Kobra Enterprises - New
Used Auto Sales - Expires 12/31/88`
Kevin Mullins - Renewal
Gasoline Stations - Expires 12/31/88
Neico Corporation (M. V. Food Shop) - Renewal
Brooks Superettes, Inc.- Renewal ;5
The Kunz Oil Company - (Highway 10K) Renewal
The Kunz Oil Company - (Mounds View K) Ren.
Clark Oil 6 Refining Company - Renewal 4
SuperAmerica - Renewal
Non -Intoxicating Malt Liquor Off -Sale - Exp. ;
12 31 38
Brooks Superette - Renewal
Country Club Market - Renewal -
Tom Thumb - 2408 Cty. Rd. I - Renewal,_.;_
Tom Thumb - Knollwood - Renewal
Nor-int2xi6cating Malt Liquor On -Sale - Exp.
12-31-8
Bel -Rae Ballroom - Renewal
Bowling Alley - Expires 12,31/38
Mermaid, Inc. - Renewal
Amusement Devices - Expires 1.2/31 88
American Amusement Arcades - Renewal
- Loose Ends
- Mermaid, Inc.
- POW s
R2=, —T i : 2
PROJECT Public Works GaraaeLOCATIOM:City of Moundsview PROTECT / 1-16-87
CONTRACTOR: - -- - - ,-- h
9240 Cottonwood Lane North Maole Grove, MN. 55369
DESCRIPTION VALUE MTLMI I AMOUNT PREVIOUS THIS COMSM
PERIOD TO DATE
i. Performance Bond 4,000.04 100 1 0 1 4,000.00
3.
Site Work
6 260 0
65
20
,321.00
4.
Concrete
21 570.0
30
5
7,549.50
5.
Masonry
95
0
40 474.75
6.
Metals -Structural & misc.
0
35
45.
25 788.00
7.
Steel Erection
__Liaa
15
60
3,858.75
8.
Caroentry
10.470.00
10
30
4,188.00 _
9.
Thermal & Moisture Control
41 37 0
47
48
39 301.50
10.
Doors & Windows
12,775,00
20
60
10,220.00
11.
Painting
4.890
0
45
2,200.50
_
-. .. _ -_. _.,_ ..,-_,l,.t__
11 ene en
20
35
11,767.25
0
TOTAL AMOUNT OF WORK COMPLETED TO DATE....
LESS RETAINAOE....
LESS AMOUNT RECEIVED....
TOTAL AMOUNT DUE....
Bi
17,266.43
SIIB-TCfAL.... 88.232.08 ✓
RESOLUTION NO. 2265
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION
TAPPROVING MINOR
. SIMON, 7821GROVELANDSIONS FOR
ROAD,
SIMON
MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING CASE N0. 228-87
WHEREAS, Mr. Simon T. Simon7821 Grovel.and Road, has
requested approval of a minor subdivision dividing the southern
35 feet Auditor's fSthe n()rthen sionrNo1289fefromet fhiseprooerty5,645 7eandf Lot 57,
WHEREAS, Mr. Simon also has requested approval of a minor
subdivision combining said 35 feet of the northern 125 feet of
the subdivision
feet of Lot 57 thus creating a combined lot of 110 feet
by 152.7 feet; and
WHEREAS, the Mounds View Planning royal inon has Resolutionswed
NO.
ision the minor sted1December 2,r198mme�ndd approval
209-87 adopted a
hS the Mounds View Planning Commission has
ivnER::..�, ..�nrinnent upon the
recommended that the City Council aPProva- Count
filing of acceptable abstracts and recording with Ramsey y•
thatCouncil of T
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IOthe minor subdivisions requested
the City of Mounds View approvescontingent upon
by Mr. Simon T. Simon, 7821 appropriatertitleRoad,
abstracts and record -
providing the City with appropriate Count
ing of those abstracts with Ramsey y•
a
Adopted this 14 day of December, 1987.
P
ATTEST.
(SEAL)
I
v
Mayor
C erk-Administrator
MEMO TO: Clerk -Administrator and City Council
FROM: Building Official Tobias
DATE: December 9, 1987
SUBJECT: CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY FOR SILVER VIEW PLAZA
2540 HIGHWAY 10
The above address has been inspected for occupancy and found to
meet all applicable Building Codes. The Certificate of Occupancy
for 2540 Highway i0 is for the core of the building only.
Separate occupancy certificates must be issaed for each
individual lease hold space.
The building has also been inspected and approved by the Fire
Department.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends issuance of the Certificate of
Occupancy for Silver View Plaza, 2540 Highway 10.
Z-
4/%
JTjbac /r/ _ aft : _ '
l "��`
6
N -
RE LUTION NO, 2270
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
APPROVING JUST AND CORRECT
CLAIMS AGAINST CITY FUNDS
WHEREAS, the City Council of Mounds View, pursuant to
Minnesota Statutes 412.241, has full authority over the financial affairs
of the City and;
WHEREAS, The City Council has reviewed the claims numbers:
21930 through 11957 in the amount of $ 105,315.88
24001 through 24090 in the amount of $ 32,008.62
through in the amount of $
through in the amount of $
TOTAL AMOUNT OF CLAIMS PRESENTED $ 137,324.70
and has found said claims to be just and correct;
(list of any exception)
NOW THEREFORE, be it reso'_ved that the City Council of Mounds View
hereby approved the attached lists of claims datedy2 b,; the
vote eyes nayes
ATTEST:
(SEAL)
4
Mayor
Clerk -Administrator
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK
REGISTER
PAGE 1
MOUNDS VIEW
AP-CIO-01
CHECK.
CHECK
INVOICE
INVOICE DISCOUNT
CHE(
VENDOR
NUMBER
DATE
INVOICE NMDR DATE
AMOUNT AMOUNT
AflOUF
NO VENDOR wAME
7;1IRATTELLE 24001
12/15/87
A2749
11/23/07
DESC-VENDORBTOTALLE/DUP
250.00
PIP250EOONE REPORT
250.(
ACCOUNT NUMRER-100-4160-303653
AMT-
250.00
250.(
71102 CINDY BELLAMY 24002
12/15/07
12.00
12/15/87
DESC-VENDORCINDY
12.00
12.(
ACCOUNT NUMBER-250-3500-351021
AMT-
TOTALBELLCMY/i2FOOOS
12.(
71103 BUDGET SIGN SHOP 24003
12/15/87
3093
11/18/87
SIGN
153.75
SHOP/LETTER
153.i
-,
ACCOUNT NUMBER-100-4190-513000
AMT-
153.75
DESC-VENDORBUDGET
153.i
TOTAL
7;304 24004
12/15/87
19505
16.33
11/13/87
16.33
16.c
ACCOUNT UMBER-100-4190-114000
ACCOUNT H
AMT-
VENDORBTOTALRTS/SUPP16.33
16.'
71105 BUSINESS RECORDS CORP 24005 12/15/07 8702850 11/20i37 30.32
ACCOUNT NUMBER-100-4120-342000 ANT- 30.32 DESC-BUSINESS RECORDS 32RP/SUPPLIES
VENDOR TOTAL
71101
SHELLY K NAUGEN 24006
12/35/87
12.00
12/15/87 12.00
DESC-SHELLY K HAUGEN/REFUND
12.O
ACCOUNT HUMBER-250-3500-351021
AMT-
VENDOR TOTAL 12.00
12.0'I
71107
ALMA 24007
12/15/87
5.75
12/15/07 5.75
DESC-VENDORRLMA
50
ACCOUNTNT NUMBER-250-3500-352130
NUN
AMT-
TOTALOHNSOW/RE5.75
5.7
7110811ARVALYN
KOENKER 24008
12/15/87
20.00
12/15/87 20.00
KOENKZR/RREEFUND
20.0
i
ACCOUNT NUMBER-250-3500-352107
AMT-
VEHDORMTOTALARVALYN
2I
71109
ROSE K.RUEGER 24009
12/15/87
12/15/87 10.00
30.0
ACCOUNT NUMBER-100-4350-391000
AMT-
10.00
DESC-VENDORROSE
30.4
TOTALORUEGER/REFUNDD
71112
METRO AREA MANAGEMENT* 24010
12/15/87
12/15/87 200.00
MGMT ASSOC/PRO SERV
200:0
ACCOUNT NUMBER-100-4120-303000
AMT-
200.00
DESC-METRO AREA
200.00
200.0
VENDOR TOTAL
71113
(ET SIEBRASS 24011
12/15/87
12/15/87 15.00
15.0
.
ACCOUNT NL'MBER-250--3500-352107
AMT-
15.00
JfSE-VENDORJTOTALGTFAi--15E00Nn
15.0
71114
BETTY SKELLY 24012
12/15/87
12/15/07 20.00
20.0
ACCOUNT NUMBER-250-3500--352107
AMT-
20.00
DESC-VENDORRETTY
20.0
TOTALSKf.LLY/REFFUNNDD
72110
LINO LAKES BLACKTOP I* 24013
12/15/07
11/19/07 2140.00
DESC-LINO LAKES BLACKTOP/ST PATCHES
2140.0
ACCOUNT NUMBER-475-4121-513000
AMT-
1355.00
I
PAGE
2
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK. REGISTER
AP-CIO-01
MOUNDS VIEW
VENDOR CHECK.
CHECK
INVOICE INVOICE DISCOUNT
CHEI
' NO
VENDOR NAME NUMBER
DATE
INVOICE
NMBR DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT
AMOUI
�4CLOU14T NUIIBER-100-4270-124000
AMT-
785.00
DESC-LIND LAKES BLACKTOP/ST PATCHES
VENDOR TOTAL 2140.00
2140.1
72111
LUTU5 24014
12/15/87
12/15/87 24.00
24.1
ACCOUNT NUMBER-100-4120-210000
AMT-
24.00
DESC-LOfUS/PUALICATIO14S
VENDOR TOTAL 24.00
7.4./
72115
BARBARA SNELL 24015
12/15/87
12/15/87 12.00
12d1
ACCOUNT HUMBER-250-8500-351021
AMT-
12.00
DESC-BARBARA SNELL/REFUND
VENDOR TOTAL 12.00
12.5
7?116
WAYNE SPIC'LKA 24016
12/15/87
12/15/07 10.00
10.f
ACCOUNT NUMBER-100-4350-391000
AMT-
10.00
DESC-WAYNE SPICZK.E/SENIOR ENTERfMNT
VENDOR TOTAL 10.00
10sf
72117
ELLEN TEIGEN 24017
12/15/37
12/15/87 20.00
20;I
ACCOUNT NUMBER-250-3500-352107
AMT-
20.00
DESC-ELLEN TEIGEN/'REFUND
VENDOR TOTAL 20.00
20:f
7211E
STA14LEY THAYER 24018
12/13/07
12/15/87 40.00
4!W
ACCOUNT NUMBER-700-4121-901000
AMT-
40.00
DESC-STANLEY THAYER/METER REFUND
VENDOR TOTAL 40.00
4014
,i
72119
TOKEN TROPHIES 8 SPOR* 24019
12/15/07
13320
12/01/87 15.00
15 0
ACCOUNT NUIIBER-275-4451-121000
AMT-
15.00
DESC-TOKEN TROPHIES E SPORTS/PLATE
<
VENDOR TOTAL 15.00
15:0
7212tr,RICK WALL 24020
12/15/87,
12/15/87 15.00
15 0
ACCOUNT HUMDER-100-4350-390000
AMT-
15.00
DESC-RICK WALL/SENIOR ENTERTAINMENT
VENDOR TOTAL 15.00
15 0
72121
CATHERINE WESTLING 24021
12/15/87
12/15/87 20.00
20:0
ACCOUNT NUMBER-250-3500-352107
AMT-
20.00
DESC-CATHERINE WESTLING/REFUND
VENDOR TOTAL 20.00
20.0
72122
LAVERLE WILKEN 24022
12/15/87
12/15/87 40.00
40.'0
ACCOUNT NUMBER-250-3500-352107
AMT-
40.00
DESC-LAVERLE WI;-KEH/REFUND
VENDOR TOTAL 40.00
40.0
75102
COMMUNICATION CENTER 24023
12/15/97
63221
11/16/07 114.85
114.8'
ACCOUNT NUMBER-100-4260-121000
AMT-
81.00
DESC-COMMUNICATIONS/ANTEHIVA
ACCOUNT NUMDER-100-4260-121000
AMT-
3.90
DESC-COMMUNICATIONS/SUPPLIES
ACCOUNT NUMDER-700-4121-122000
AMT- a
29.95
DESC-COMMUNICATIONS/ANTENNA
VENDOR TOTAL 114.85
114:8'
75107
FLOWERS TO GO 24024
12/15/87
2053
11/30/07 57.00
57.01
ACCOUNT NUMBER-100-4100-160000
AMT-
28.50
DESC-FLOWERS TO GO/SAARION PLANT
ACCOUNT NUMBER-100-4100-160000
AMT-
28.50
DEEC-FLOWERS TO GO/SAARION PLANT
VENDOR TOTAL 57.00
57.01
PAGE 3 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER
AP-00-01• MOUNDS VIEW
VENDOR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE DISCOUNT
NO VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT
75IrlO0ER FREDSALL 24025 12/15-87 1554 11/19/87 55.2$
ACCOUNT NUMBER-100-4260-160000 AMT- 55.23 DESC-ROGER FREDSALL/SUPPLIES
24025 12/I5/87 1380 11/12/87 34.55
ACCOUNT NUMBER-100-4260-160000 AMT- 34.55 DESC-ROGER FREDSALL/SUPPLIES
24025 12/15/07 M957259 12/15/87 18.58
ACCOUNT NUMBER-100-4260-160000 AMT- 10.58 DESC-ROGER FREDSALL/SUPPI.IFS
VENDOR TOTAL 108.36
79209 ATTITUDE DEV CONSULTAX 24026 12/15/87 P-8387-2D 11/2B/07 21.00
ACCOUNT NUMBER-100-4120-363000 AMT- 21.00 DESC-ATTITUDE DEV CONSLT/TRAINING
VENDOR TOTAL 21.00
79223 HEALY-•P.UFF COMPANY 24027 12/15/07 36602 09/04/87 1500.00
ACCOUNT NUMBER-100-4270-703000 AMT- 1500.00 DESC-HEALY-RUFF/CAPITOL OUTLAY
VENDOR 1,'.TAL 1500.00
31123 NATIONAL CAMERA EXCHA* 24028 12/15/87 26659 12/01/87 99.90
ACCOUNT NUMBER-100-4200-703000 A111- 99.90 DESC-NAT'L CAMERA EXCHG/POLOROID
VENDOR TOTAL 99.90
A0100 AMI CANON 24029 12/15/87 1511-6 12/01/07 8.00
ACCOUNT NUMBER-100-4190-411400 AMT- 0.00 DESC-AMI CANON/SUPPLIES
VENDOR TOTAL P..00
A0280 A T & T 24030 12/15/87 12/15/87 9.19
,ACCOUNT NUMBER-255-4121--?10000 AMT- 9.19 DESC-AT&T/COPIMUNICATION
VENDOR TOTAL 9.19
A0290 A T & T 24031 12/15/87 12/15/97 3.96
ACCOUNT NUMBER-100-4190-310000 AMT- 3.96 DESC-AT&T/COMMUNICATIONS
VENDOR TOTAL 3.96
A0293 A T Y. T COMMUNICATIONX 24032 12/15/87 12/15/07 5.81
ACCOUNT NUMBER-100-4190-310000 AMT- 5.81 DESC-AT&T/COMMUNICATIONS
VENDOR TOTAL 5.81
108.:
21N
21.1
500.1
SGOf
99.i
99.5
8:C
e"a
5.8
B20 ADVANCED PRINTING 24033
12/15/87
23090
11/27/87 1440.00
1490:A
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-100-4190-343000
AMT-
720.00
DESC-ADVANCED PRINTING/NEWSLETTER
=aa
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-100-4350-343000
AMT-
720.00
DESC-ADVANCED PRINTING/NEWSLETTER
VENDOR TOTAL 1440.00
1440:01
005 BEISSWENGER HARDWARE 24034
12/15/07
5634
10/16/87 2.55
2.5'
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-100-4200-122000
AMT-
2.55
DESC-BEISSWENGER/SUPPLIES
24034
12/15/87
1278
11/80/87 23.67
2376;
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-100-4190-121000
AMT-
23.67
DESC-BEISSWENGER/SUPPLIES
24034
12/15/87
498
11/19/87 2.25
2.2;
ACCOUNT
HUMBER-700-4121-123000
AMT-
2.25
DESC-BEISSWENGER/SUPPLIES
24034
12/15/87
-5634
12/15/87 9.12
9.1;
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-100-4190-121000
AMT-
9.12
DESC-BEISSWEHGERS/SUPPLIES
24034
12/15/87
15A
11/18/07 16.85
16.8:
PAGE 4
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER
AP-CIO-01
MOUNDS VIEW
VENDOR CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE DISCOUNT
CHEI
NO VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT
AMOUi
k -'ACCOUHT
_
NUMBER-410-4120-705000
AMT- 16.85 DESC-BEISWEHGER/STAIN FOR RANDOM
24034 12/15/87 30/30/87 9.19
9:7
ACCOUNT NUMBER-100-4190-511000
AMT- 9.19 DESC-BEISSWENGERS/SUPPLIES
24084 12/15/87 20A 10/30/87 17.78
17.7
ACCOUNT NUMBER-410-4120-705000
AMT- 17.70 DESC-BEISSWENGER/SUPPLIES
x 24034
12/15/07 12A 11/02/87 4.69
4 E
ACCOUNT NUMBER-100-4260-121000
AMT- 4.69 DESC-BEISSWENGER/SUPPLIES
24034
12/15/87 11/02/07 15.96
15Y'9
ACCOUNT KUMBER-100-4260-123000
AMT- 15.96 DESC-BEISSWENGERS/SUPPLIES
z,
24034
12/15/87 9B 11/06/07 62.00
62:Q
ACCOUNT NUPIBER-100-4260-123000
AI1T- 62.00 DESC-BEISSWENGER/SUPPLIES
VENDOR TOTAL 164.06
164:0
A4985 AMERICAN LINEN SUPPLY* 24036
12/15/87 P77661123 11/23/87 10.00
ACCOUNT NUMBER-100-4190-355000
AMT- 10.00 DESC-AnLR1CAN LINEN/TOWELS
24036
12/15/87 P60811207 12/07/87 10.00
10.-
ACCOUNT NUMBER-100-4190-355000
AMT- 10.00 DESC-AMERICAN LINEN/TOWELS
VENDOR TOTAL 20.00
200
A4998 AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK24037
12/15/87 1139 11/09/87 88.71
;;88".7
ACCOUNT NUMBER-590-4120-803000
AMT- 88.71 DESC-AMERICAN NAT'L BANY/AGENT FEE
24037
12/15/87 1140 11/09/87 53.00
`3 0
ACCOUNT NUMBER-590-4120-803000
AMT- :53.00 DISC-6hERICAH HAf'L BANY/AGENT FEE
..-7
VENDOR TOTAL 141.71
1417.
� r 1MERICAN
011' OFFICE PRODU* 24038
12/15/87 181596 11/30/87 3.37
3'3
ACCOUNT NUMBER-100-4190-114000
AM1'• 3.37 DESC-AMERICAN OFFICE PROD/SUPPLIES
-
24088
12/15/97 131193 11/20/87 119.17
119.3
ACCOUNT NUMBER-100-4190-114000
AMT- 119.17 DESC-AMERICAN OFFICE PROD/SUPPLIES
24038
12/15/87 131791 11/30/87 16.84
db:b
ACCOUNT NUMBER-100-4190-114000
AMT- 16.84 DESC-AMERICAN OFFICE PROD/SUPPLIES
VENDOR TOTAL 139.38
1393
IA5300 M H ANDERSON CONSTRUC* 24039
12/15/87 11/25/87 151.50
151.5
ACCOUNT HUMBER-410-4120-705000
ANT- 151.50 DESC-M H ANDERSON CONST/GRADING
VENDOR TOTAL 151.50
151.5
B6750 BRAD RAGAN INC. 24040 12/25/87 105049 11/10/07 161.31
161.`3
ACCOUNT HUMBER-730-4121-122000
AMT- 161.81 DESC-BRnC RAGAN.'CUPPITES
VENDOR TOTAL 161.31
161:3
C0655 CASE POWER I EQUIPMEN, 24041 12/15/87
CS 64362 11/06/87 70.05
70.0
ACCOUNT NUMBER-730-4121-123000
AMT- 70.05 DESC--CASE/SUPPLIES
VENDOR TOTAL 70.05
70.0
C3022 CHAPIN PUBLISHING 24042 12/15/87
75185 11/16/87 177.84
177.8
ACCOUNT HUMBER-100-2303-000089
AMT- 177.84 DESC-CHAPIN PUBLISHING/ADVERTISEMNT
R
VENDOR TOTAL 177.84
177.0.
C3100 CHENOWETH WHOLESALE FK 24043 12/15/07 00006 11/17/87 18.90
18.9"
PAGE• 5
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER
AP-C10-01
MOUNDS VIEW
VENDOR CHECK
CHECK
INVOICE INVOICE DISCOUNT
CHI
' N7rENDOR NAME NUMBER
DATE
INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT
AMOI
®ACCOUNT P"'IBER-100-4100-160000
AMT-
10.90 DESC-CHENOWETH FLORAL/BRAGER PLANT
VENDOR TOTAL 18.90
18,
C5845 COMPUTOSERVICE, INC. 24044
12/15/07
11/30/07 1578.77
1573.
ACCOUNT NUMBER-100-4120-703000
AMT-
573.77 DESC-COMPUTOSERVICE/TRAINING
ACCOUNT NUMBER-100-4120-703000
AMT-
1000.00 DESC-COMPUTUSERVICE/SOFTWARE
VENDOR TOTAL 1573.77
1573•
C5960 CONTEL CREDIT CORPORA* 24045
12/15/07
11/11/87 300.97
$00.
ACCOUNT NUNDER-100-4190-310000
ANT-
300.97 DESC-CONTEL/LEASE OF PHONE SYSTEM
VENDOR TOTAL 300.97
300.
C5980 CONTRACT CL--cAMINU 24046
12/15/87
11/15/87 660.00
660.
ACCOUNT NUMBER-100-4190-353000
AM7-
530.00 DESC-CONTRACT CLEANING/NOV SERVICE
ACCOUNT NUMBER-100-4190-121000
AMT-
130.00 DESC-CONTRACT CLEANING/SUPPLIES
VENDOR TOTAL 660.00
660.
C6000 COPY SALES 24047
12/15/87
00061131 12/02/87 200.75
200.
ACCOUNT NUMBER-100-4190-112000 AMT- 169.75 DESC-COPY SALES/COPY PAPER
ACCOUNT HUMBER-100-4190-112000 AMT- 31.00 DESC-COPY SALES/TONER
VENDOR TOTAL 200.75
C6025 COTTENS INC 24048 12/15/87 S-782170 11/25/87 5.34
ACCOUNT NUMBER-100-4260-122000 AMT- 5.34 DESC-COTTEN'S/SUPPLIES
24040 12/15/87 S-781942 11/23/87 7.16
CCCOUNT NUMBER-100-4260-123000 AMT- 7.16 DESC-COTTEN'S/SUPPLIES
24048 12/15/87 S-780843 11/13/87 28.40
-ACCOUNT NUMBER-100-4260-122000 AMT- 28.40 DESC-COTTEH'S/SUPPLIES
24043 12/15/87 S-782925 12/03/87 47.73
ACCOUNT NUMBER-100-4260-122000 AMT- 47.73 DESC-COTTEN'S/SEAT COVER
VENDOR TOTAL 88.68
C9700 CY'S MENS WEAR 24049 12/15/37 31219 11/03/07 23.40
ACCOUNT NUMBER-100-4200-240000 AMT- 23.40 DESC-CY'S UNIFORMS/RESERVE ARCS
24049 12/15/87 31353 11/17/87 29.75
ACCOUNT NUMBEP.-100-4200-240000 AMT- 29.75 DESC-CY'S UNIFORMS/BADGE WALLET
VENDOR TOTAL 53.15
DAVIES WATER EOUIPMEN* 24050 12/15/87 12536 11/20/87 39.21
ACCOUNT NUMBER-700-4121-160000 AMT- 39.21 DESC-DAVIES WATER EQUIP/CLAMP
VENDOR TOTAL 39.21
EXECUTONE 24051 12/15/87 47741 11/18/07 111.36
ACCOU14T NUMBER-100-419J-310000 AIIT- 111.36 DESC-EXECUTONE/INSTALL PHONE
VENDOR TOTAL 111.36
5 FEDORS MARKET 24052 12/15/87 12/02/87 54.26
ACCOUNT NUMBER-100-4190-114000 AMT- 25.66 DESC-FEDORS MARKET/SUPPLIES
ACCOUNT NUMBER-100-3912-000000 AMT- 10.00 DESC-FEDORS MARKET/SUPPLIES
44CCOUNT NUMBER-250-4351-160021 AMT- 18.60 DESC-FEDORS MARKET/SUPPLIES
200.7
5.3
7.1,
28.41
47.7;
88.6i
23.41
29.7`.
53.1°
39.21
39.21
111.36
111.36
54.26
" ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER
PAGE' b MOUNDS VIEW
INVOICE INVOICE DISCOUNT
AP;-Ol AMOUNT
NDft DATE
VENDOR CHECK CHECY, AMOUNT
NqfENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICE
VENDOR TOTAL 54.26
555.311/05/87 555.35
F2000 5 DESC-FEED-RITE/SUPPLIES)
ACCOUNTTHUMBER-700-4121-1600003 1AM1'J/87 9467
VENDOR TOTAL 555.3
12/15/87 50.00
BANK
F.3636 IST ACCOUNATNUMBER Of00N4190-1140004 1AMT5/G7 50.00 DESC-FIRST STATE BA510.000POSIT BOX
VENDOR TOTAL
4055 12/15/87 A31696 11/30/87 56.87
2
F5890 THE FORMS GROUP 56.87 DESC THE FORMS OR
ACCOUNT AMT-
ACCOUNT NUMBER-100-4190-114000 VENDOR TOTAL 56.87
11/24/87 15.00
240674
F6761 FRAN'S SERVICE 56 12/15/07 849674
DESC-FRAt4'S SERVICE/ATEHANCE
ACCOUNT NUMDER-100-4260-513000 AMT- VENDOR TOTAL SOO
24057 12/15/87 0227521 11/16/87 90.00
G0055 G F 0 A 90.00 DESC-GFOA/MLMDERSNI9
ACCOUNT HUMBER-100-4150-341000 AMT- VENDOR TOTAL 90.00
2/15/87 59019 11/23/67 360.30
24058 1
61000 GARMENT GRAPHICS, INC* 360.33 DESC-GAkMENT GRAPHICS/JACY•ET
ACCOUNT HUMBER-100-4100-160000 AMT VENDOR TOTAL 360.38
®- 11/17/07 36.50
62100 GENERATOR SPECIALTY C* 24059 12/15/37 8850
ACCOUNT NUMBER-100-4260-122000 AMT- 36.50 VENDORGTOTALIOR SPEC36LJY0/I;EGULATOR
24060 12/15/87 497-027383 11/113/87 167.22
W W GRAINGER INC
24060 12/15/87 497-827734 11/20/87 92.54 AI1T- 10.22 DESC-W W GRAINGER/RANDGM-CAP OUTLA
ACCOUNT NUMBER-410-4120 705000
ACCOUNT NUMBER-100-4121-160000 AMT- 92.54 DESC--W W GRAINGER/PUMP
24060 12/15/87 497-027730 !1/20/B7 37.24
37.2q
TORCH
ACCOUNT NUMBER-730-4121-160000 AMT- DESC-W W GRAI14GEk/297.00
VENDOR TOTAL
24061 12/15/07 1140163 11/11/87 95.28
HARMON GLASS 95.28 DESC-HARMON GLASS/SUPPLIES
ACCOUNT NUMBER-730-4121 513000 SPIT" VENDOR TOTAL 95.28
24062 12/15/07 101. 11/23/B7 1.01.95
JIM HATCH SALES CO. AMT_ 101.75 DESC-JI11 HATCH SALES/SHOVELS
ACCOUNT 14UMBER-100-4360-160000 11/23/87 24.73
24062 12.`15/87 7744
24.73 DESC-JIHATCH SALES/SUPPLIES
ACCOUNT NUNDER-700-4121-160000 AMT-
VENDOR TOTAL
tl/17/87 95.00
HENNEPIN CTY CHIEFS O% 2;06'• 17/15/37 193400 DESC-HEHN CO PATAC/TRAINING
,(:COUNT NUMBER-100-4200-363000 AMT-
CHECI
AMC-Ii'
54.2,
555.$:
50.0 .
50.0i
Sb.Bi
56.8.
15.0(
15.0(;
90.0(;
360.3E
360.3E
$6.50
167.2
92.5
37.2
297.E
95.:
95.
101.'
24.
126.
95.
PAGE 7
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER
AP-CIO-01
MOUNDS VIEW
y
VENDEIR
CHECK
CHECK.
INVOICE
iNVOICE DISCOUNT
CHEC
N,IENDOR
NAME NUMBER
DATE
INVOICE
NMBR DATE
AMOUNT AMOUNT
AMOUN
VENDOR TOTAL
95.00
95.0
H5600 HOLMES
L GRAVEN 24064
12/115/87 16861
11/24/87
377.95
379.9
ACCOUNT 14UMBER-100-2303-000889
AMT-
379.95
DESC-HOLMES 3 GRAVEN/LEGAL SERVICES
VENDOR TOTAL
379.95
379.9
I5400 INGMAN
LABORATORIES, 24065
12/15/87
12/15/87
40.80
40:8
ACCOUNT NUMBER-700-4121-303000
AMT-
40.30
DESC-INGMAN LAB/ANALYSES
VENDOR TOTAL
40.00
40.61
L0560 LAMPERT BUILDING CENT* 24066
12/15/87
05302
10/26/87
33.90
as.9
ACCOUNT NUMBER-100-4190-121000
AMT-
33.90
DESC-LAMPERT/SUPPLIES
VENDOR TOTAL
33.90
339
L1860 LEAGUE
OF MI14NESOTA Cz 24067
12/15/87
12/15/07
80.00
80 0
ACCOUNT
NUIIDER-100-4120-210000
AMT-
80.00
DESC-LEAGUE OF
MN CITIES/HANDBOOK
VENDOR TOTAL
90.00
80p�
_
L2075 LENFER
TRANSMISSION 24068
12/15/87
3447
11/18/87
290.00
290.0
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-100-4260-513000
AMT-
290.00
DESC-LENFER ATOMATIC TRANS/MAINTENC
VENDOR TOTAL
290.00
290.0
r
L3545 LILLIE
SURURBAN NEWS 24069
12/15/07
14132
11/27/07
69.48
I
690
�=OUNT
NUMBER-100-2303-000809
AMT-
69.48
DESC-LILLIE SUB
HEUS/LEGAL NOTICES
VENDOR TOTAL
69.48
69r4
L4000 LORENZ
BUS SERVICE, Ix 24070
12/15/87
872893
11/25/07
168.00
168.0.1
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-250-4351-391021
AMT-
163.00
DESC-LORLN14Z BUS/SCHOOL'S OUT
24070
12/15/87
872940
12/03/87
90.00
90.0
ACCOUNT
NUIIBER-250-4351-391042
AMT-
90.00
DESC-LORENZ BUS
SERVICE/SESAME ST
VENDOR TOTAL
258.00
2580
M2170 METRO WASTE CONTROL 24071
12/lc-/87
11/30/87
1559.25
1559.2
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-730-3822-000000
AMT- 1559.25
DESC-METRO WASTE CONTROL/SAC FEES
VENriOR TOTAL
1559.25
15S9.2
M3442 MIDWEST
ASPHALT CORPO* 24072
12/15/07
021238
11/13/87
47.91
47.9
ACCOUNT
14UMBER-100-4270-124000
AMT-
47.91
DESC-MIDWEST ASPHALT/SUPPLIES
24072
12/15/87
021269
11/20/07
53.89
53.8
ACCOUNT
14UIIDER-700-4121-124000
AMT-
53.39
DESC-MIDWEST ASPHALT/SUPPLIES
VENDOR TOTAL.
101.80
101.8
13444 MIDWEST
AUTOMOTIVE INS 24073
12/15/87
008837
12/03/87
67.12
67.1
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-100-4260-123000
AMT-
67.12
DESC-MIDWEST AUTOMOTIVE/MOTORS
24073 12/IS/87
007989
il/24/87
43.47
43.4
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-100-4260-123000
AMT-
43.49
DESC-MIDWEST AUTOMOTIVE/PARTS
VENDOR TOTAL
110.61
110.61
14200 NORTHERN
STATES POWER* 24074 12/15/87
12/15/87
7986.91
7996.91
;COUNT
NUMBER-255-4121-321000
AMT-
17.81
DESC-NSP/UTILITY
BILLI140
PAGE 8
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK
REGISTER
AP-CIO-01
MOUNDS VIEW
INVOICE
INVOICE
VENF
CHECK
CHECK
N VENDOR
NAME NUMBER
DATE
I14VOICE NMBR DATE
AMOUNT
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-700-4121--321000
AMT-
24.78
DESC-NSF/UTILITY
BILLING
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-700-4121•-321000
AMT-
25.49
DESC-NSP/UTILITY
BILLING
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-700-4121-321000
AMT-
758.08
DESC-NSP/UTILITY
BILLING
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-700-4121-321000
AMT-
28.93
DESC-NSP/UTILITY
BILLING
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-700-4121-32.000
AMT-
398.47
DESC-NSF'/UTILITY
BILLING
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-700-4121-321000
AMT-
691.10
DESC-NSP/UTILITY
BILLING
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-700-4121-321000
AMT-
445.87
DESC-NSF/UTILITY
BILLING
ACCOUNT
HUMBER-700-4121-321000
AMT--
7.94
DESC-NSP/UTILITY
BILLING
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-700-4121-322000
AMT-
81.45
DESC-NSP/UT]LITY
BILLING
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-700-4121-322000
AMT-
79.50
DESC-NSP/UTILITY
BILLI14G
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-700-4121-322000
AMT-
27.15
DESC-NSF/UTILITI'
BILLING
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-700-4121-322000
AMT-
77.53
DESC-NSP/UTILITY
BILLI14G
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-700-4121-322000
AMT-
39.7.0
DESC-NSP/UTILITY
BILLING
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-700-4121-322000
AMT-
20.20
DESC-NSP/UTILITY
BILLING
ACCOUNT
NUMBF.R-730-4121-321000
ANT-
41.76
DESC-NSP/UTILITY
BILLING
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-730-4121-321000
AMT-
22.35
DESC-NSP/UTILITY
BILLING
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-780-4121-321000
AMT-
35.09
DESC-NSP/UTILITY
BILLING
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-100-4190-321000
AMT-
744.96
DESC-NSP/UTILITY
BILLING
ACCGUNT
NUMBER-100-4190-222000
AMT-
641.24
DESC-NSP/UTILITY
BILLING
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-100-4230-321000
AMT-
2.50
DESC-NSP/UTILITY
BILLING
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-100-4230-321000
AMT-
4.90
DESC-NSP/UTILITY
BILLING
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-100-4260-321000
AMT-
146.74
DESC-NSP/UTILITY
BILLING
ACCOU14T
NUMBER-100-4260-322000
AMT-
397.79
DESC-h3P/UTILITY
BILLING
CCCOUNT
NUMBER-100-4270-324000
AMT-
21.76
DESC-NSP/UTILITY
BILLING
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-100-4270-325000
AIiT-
106.07
DESC-NSP.'UTILITY
BILLING
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-100-4270-325000
Q1-
110.35
BESC-NSP/UTILITY
BILLING
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-•100-4270-325000
AMT-
94.74
DESC-NSP/UTILITY
BILLINGG
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-100-4860-321000
AMT-
29.12
DESC-NSP/UTILITY
9ILLING
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-100-4360-321000
AMT-
5.45
DESC-NSP/UTILITY
BILLING
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-100-4360-321000
AMT-
23.60
DESC-NSF/UTILITY
BILLING
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-100-4360-321000
AMT-
10.12
DESC-149/UTILITY
BILLING
ACCOUNT
HUIIBER-ICO-4360-321000
AMT-
19.58
DESC-NSF/UTILITY
BILL1140
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-100-4360-321000
AMT-
131.61
DESC-NSP/UTILITY
BILLING
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-100-4360-321000
AMT-
J2.34
DESC-NSP/UTILITY
BILLING
ACCOUNT
NUIIBER-]00-4360-321000
APT-
6.21
DESC-NSP/UTILITY
BILLING
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-100-4360--321000
AMT-
0.27
DESC-NSP/UTILITY
BILLING
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-100-4270-324000
AMT-
2697.1-7
DESC-NSP/UTILITY
BILLING
ACCOUNT
NHMDER-255-4121 -�21000
AMT-
5.51
DESC-LISP/UTILITY
BILLING
VENDOR -OTAL
7986.91
M4400 NORTHWESTERN
BELL TEL* 24078
12/15/87
12/15/07
52.53
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-100-4190-310000
AMT-
52.5:i
DESC-HW BELL/COMMUNICATIONS
VENDOR TOTAL
52.53
DISCOUNT
AMOUNT
PRECISION BUSINESS SYX 24079 12/15/87 S050076 12/03/07 11.25
ACCOUNT NUMBER-100-4190 `13000 AMT- 11.25 DESC-PRECISION BUS SYST/MAINTEHANC.E
VENDOR TOTAL 11.25
IMSEY COUNTY TREASUR% 24000 12/15/87 12/15/87 771.50
COUNT NIUMBF.R-649-4121-701000 AMT- 771.5E DESC-RAMSEY CO/JOHNSON PROPERTY TAX
7906.
52.
52.
11.
11.
771.
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER
PAGE
9
MOUNDS VIEW
AP-C 01
CHECK
CHECK
INVOICE INVOICE DISCOUNT
CHEC
VEN1�
NO
VENDOR
NAME NUMBER
DATE
INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT
AMOUN
24080
12/15/87
C05632
11/17/87 30.37
30.3
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-100-4150-303000
AMT-
10.12
DESC-RAMSEY CO/PROFESSIONAL SERVICE
CO/PROFESSIONAL SERVILE
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-700-4120-303000
AMT-
10.i3
DESC-RAMSEY
DESC-RAMSEY CO/PROFESSIONAL SERVICE
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-730-4120-303000
AMT-
10.12
VENDOR TOTAL 801.95
801.9
R5950
PAM ROSE 24081
12/15/87
112387
11/23/97 73.00
73•�
ACCOUNT
NL.18Ek-100-4100-020000
AMT-
7$.00
DESC-PAMELA ROSE/11/23.'87
73.00
73.0
VENDOR TOTAL
53225
SHORT ELLIOTT
R HENGR* 24002
12/15/87
9989
11/19/87 2536.42
2536.4
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-100-2303-000889
AMT-
559.31
DESC-SEH/ENNEST
ASSESSMENT REAPPORTIONMENT
ACCOUNT
HUHBER-700-4120--$03000
AMT-
705.67
705.69
DESC-SEH/ASSESSMENT REAPPORTIONMENT
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-730-4120-308000
AMT-
99.43
DESC-SEN/COUNTY ROAD I
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-499-4121--303655
AMT-
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-420-4121-303000
AMT-
260.31
DESC-SEH/SWM
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-100-2303-000901
AMT-
9.08
125.24
DESC-SEH/GREENFIEI.D
DESC-SEH/DYNAMICS DESIGNERS
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-lU0-2303-000886
AMT-
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-10-2303-000893
AMT-
71.70
DESC-VENDORSTOTALD DAY. 2536.42
2536.4
S5605
SNYDERS
DRUG STORES 24003
i2/15/87
002009
11/30/37 18.47
ICCOUNT
NUMBER-100-4190-114000
AMT-
18.47
DESC-SNYDERS/SUPPLIES
�1
l
24003
12/IS/87
002008
11/24/37 41.94
9
ACCOUNT
4UMBER-100-4200-160000
AMT-
41.94
DE5C-S1IYUER DRUGS/PHOTO SUPPLIES
19.9
24083
12/15/87
002010
12/04/87 19.98
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-100-4200-160000
AMT-
19.98
DESC-SNYDER DRUGS/SUPPLIES
80.3
VENDOR TOTAL 80.37
IS6250
2
SPRING LAKE FAR.: fITiE;; 4084
12/1.,/87
213.G6
12/04/87 213.86
DESC-SPR LK PK FIRE/INSPCTIONS
213.BA
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-100-4210-303000
AMT-
VENDOR TOTAL 213.06
213.86
2225
TEXGAS
24085
12/15/87
12/15/87 1667.98
1667.9b
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-100-1260-000000
AMT-
297.04
DESC-TEXGAS/INVENTORY
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-100-1260-000000
AMT-
103.05
DESC-TEXGAS/INVENTORY
ACCOUNT
NUNL_R-300-1260-000000
AMT-
241.28
DESC-TEXGAS/INVENTORY
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-100-1260-000000
AMT-
93.71
DE5C-TEXGAS/1141)ENTORY
ACCOUNT
NUPIDER-100-1260-000000
AMT-
221.24
DESC-TEXGAS/DIVEHIDRY
ACCOUNT
NUIIEFR-100-1260-000000
AMT-
76.76
DESC-TEXGAS/INVENTORY
_
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-100-1260-000000
Ai.IT-
230.30
DESC-TL•XGAS/INVENTORY
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-100-1260-000000
AMT-
79.90
DESC-TEXGAS/INVENTORY
ACCOU14T
NUMBER-100-1260-000000
AMT-
203.3$
DE5C-TEXGAS/INVENTORY
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-100-1260-000000
AMT-
70.55
DESC-TEXGAS/INVENTORY
ACCOUNT
14UMBER-100-4260-122000
AMT-
39.60
DESC-TEXGAS/SUPPLIES
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-730-4121-122000
AMT-
21.20
DESC-IES
SUPPL1667.90
1667.98
VENDORTOTAL
SYSTEM
1AMT-/87
0
46.20
`500
CCOUNTF(NUMBER-7S0-4
121-24 000
46.2012DESC-UNI10G8UNIFORMS/UNIFORMS
PAGE 10
AP-(P01
VENDci,%
NO VENDOR NAME
24007 12/15/87 2832741120 11/20/87 61.20
ACCOUNT NUMBER-730-4121-240000 AMT- 61.20 DESC-UNITOG UNIFORMS/UNIFORMS
VENDOR TOTAL 107.40
ACCOUw S PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER
MOUNDS VIED
CHECK CHECK INVOICE INVOICE DISCOUNT
HUMBER DATE I14VOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT
V7000 VOTO TAUTOES 9. REDPAT* 24088 12/15/87 11/30/87 2982.50
ACCOUNT NUMBER-100-4150-303000 AMT- 1789.50 DESC-VOTO,TAUTGES, REDPATH/AUDITING
ACCOUNT NUMBER-700-4120-303000 AMT-- 596.50 DESC-VOTO,TAUTGES, REDPATH/AUDITING
ACCOUNT NUMBER-730-4120-303000 AMT- 596.50 DESC-VO'T0,'iAUTGES, REDPATH/AUDITING
VENDOR TOTAL 2982.50
650 WARNER INDUSTRIAL SUP* 24089 12/15/87 1282115-01 10/30/87 59.36
ACCOUNT NUMBER-410-4121-705000 AMT- 59.36 DESC-WARNER IND SUPPLY/PAINT
VENDOR TOTAL 59.33
ZEP MANUFACTURING COM* 24090 12/15/87 S7201181 11/25/81 157.35
ACCOUNT NUMBER-100-4260-160000 AMT- 157.35 DESC-ZEP MFG/CLEANING SUPPLIES
VENDOR TOTAL 157.35
GRAND TOTAL 32008.62
rw
4:-11
F9.
157:
157
PAG1 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PRE -PAID CHECK REGISTER
AP- z02 MOUNDS VIEW
VENDOR CHECK CHECKINVOICE INVOICE DISCOUNT
NO VENDOR NAME NUMBER DATE INVOICL' NiIBR DATE AMOUNT )MOUHT
M2075 MENARDS 21930 11/17/87 11/17/87 275.00
ACCOUNT NUMBER-100-4360-121000 AMT- 275.00 DESC-VENDORMS/DOORS
TOTAL47J 00
81210 JEANETTE STURGES 21931 11/18/87 11/10/87 16.00
ACCOUNT NUMBER-250-3500-354255 AMT- 16.00 VENDORJTOTALTE SiURGES REFUND
16
6 1ST STATE BANK OF NEW* 21932 11./20/87 11/20/87 42579.01
ACCOUNT NUMBER-100-4120-010000 AMT- 1830.90 DESC-FIRST STATE BANK - SALARIES
ACCOUNT NUMBER-100-4150-010000 AMT- 2816.68 DESC-FIRST STATE BANK - SALARIES
ACCOUNT NUMBER-100-4100-010000 AMT- 2961.72 DESC-FIRST STATE BANK - SALARIES
ACCOUNT HUMBER-100-4190-010000 AMT- 632.80 DESC-FIRST STATE BANK - SALARIES
ACCOUNT NUMBER-100-4200-010000 AMT- 17726.35 DESC-FIRST STATE BANK - SALARIES
ACCOUNT NUMBER-100-4200-011000 AMT- 344.70 DESC-FIRST STATE BANK - SALARIES
ACCOUNT NUMBER-100-4200-020000 AMT- 347.06 DESC-FIRST STATE BANK. - SALARIES
ACCOUNT NUMBER-300-4230-010000 AMT- 928.50 DESC-FIRST STATE BANK - SALARIES
ACCOUNT NUMBER-100-4240-020000 AMT- 210.00 DESC-FIRST STATE BABY. - SALARIES
ACCOUNT NUMBER-100-4260-010000 ANT- 1008.00 DESC-FIRST STATE BANK - SALARIES
ACCOUNT NUMBER-100-4260-011000 AMT- 141.75 DESC-FIRST STATE BANK - SALARIES
ACCOUNT N..UMBER-100-4270-010000 AMT- 1000.00 DESC-FIRST STATE BANK, - SALARIES
ACCOUNT NUMBER-100-4350-010000 AMT- 2396.00 DESC-FIRST STATE BANK. - SALARIES
ACCOUNT NUMBEP-100-4350-020000 AMT- 490.38 DESC-FIRST STATE BANK -SALARIES
ACCOUNT NUMBER-100-4360-010000 AMT- 1866.48 DESC-FIRST STATE BANK - SALARIES
ACCOUNT NUMBER-100-4360-011000 AMT- 36.30 DESC-FIRST STATE BANK - SALARIES
ACCOUNT NUMBER-250-4351-020011 AMT- 81.26 DESC-FIRST STATE BANK - SALARIES
ACCOUNT NUMBER-250-4351-020014 APIT- 53.63 IIESC-FIRST STATE BANK - SALARIES
ACCOUNT NUMBER-250-4351-020024 AMT- 390.00 DESC-FIRST STATE BANK - SALARIES
ACCOUNT !:UMBER-250-4351-020039 AMT- 11.37 DESC-FIRST STATE BANK - SALARIES
ACCOUNT NUMBER-250-4351-020042 AMT- 70.00 DESC-FIRST STATE BANI( - SALARIES
ACCOUNT NUMBER-250-4352-304102 AMT- 160.00 DESC-FIRST STATE BANK - SALARIES
ACCOUNT NUMBER-250-4354-020227 AMT- 32.82 DESC-FIP.ST STATE BANK - SALARIES
ACCOUNT NUMBED-250-4354-0'_.Q30 Ai:T- 11.86 DESC-FIRST STATE BANK - SALARIES
ACCOUNT NUMBER-250-4354-020231 AMT- 1U.14 AESC-FIRST STATE DANK - SALARIES
ACCOUNT NUMBER-250-4354-0202'2 AMT- 6B.07 DESC-FIP.ST STATE B:,tiK SALARIES
ACCOUNT NUMBER-250-4354-0202?4 AMT •185.13 DESC-FIRST STATE DA'ALtIIES
ACCOUNT NUMBER-250-4354-020237 AMT- 55.37 DESC-FIRS .')TF BAN1: - SALARIES
ACCOUNT NUMBER-250-4354-020238 AMT- 11.44 DESC-FIRST S'fA1;_ BANK - SALARIES
ACCOUNT NUMBER-250-4354-020239 AMT- 79.79 DESC-FIRST STATE BANK - SALARIES
ACCOUNT NUMBER-250-4354-020244 AMT- 134.66 DESC-FIRST STATE BANE( - SALARIES
ACCOUNT NUMBER-250-4354-020250 ANT- 138.63 DESC-FIRST STATE BANE: - SALARIES
ACCOUNT NUMBER-250-4354-020253 AMT- 47.26 DESC-FIRST STATE BANK - SALARIES
ACCOU14T NUIIBER-250-4354-020254 AMT- 12.75 DESC-FIRST STATE BANK - SALARIES
ACCOUNT NUMBER-250-4354-020255 AMT- 7.88 DESC-FIRST STATE BANE: - SALARIES
ACCOUNT NUMBER-250-4354-020256 AMT- 21.00 DESC-FInST STATE BANE( - SALARIES
ACCOUNT NUMBER-270-4121-020000 AMT- 52.00 DESC-FIRST ST:.TE BANK - SALARIES
4CCOUNT NUMBER-275-4451-020000 APIT- 293.63 DESC-FIRST STATE BANK - SALARIES
COUNT NUMBER-700-4120-010000 AMT- 536.55 DESC-FIRST STATE BA14K - SALARIES
ACCOUNT NUIIBER-700-4121-010000 AMT- 2U16.00 DESC-FIRST STATE BANI; - SALARIES
ACCOUNT NUMBER-700-4121-011000 AMT- 39.30 DESC-FIRSf SfA1'E BANE; - SALARIES
275.1
16:1
16.1
42579.'0
ACCOUNTS
PAYABLE PRE-PATD CHECK REGISTER
AG('�2
AP-ClV-02
MOUNDS VIEU
INVOICE
NVOI
INVOICE DISCOUNT
CHEC
VENDOR
CHEf,fC
NUMBER
CHECK
DATE
INVOICE
HMbR DATE
AfflUNT AMOUNT
AMOU
NO VENDOR
NAME
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-700-4121-020000
AMT-
352.00
DESC-FIRST
DESC-FIkST
STATE BANK. _ SALARIES
STATE BANK SALARIES
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-730-4120-010000
AMT-
AMT-
536.55
2115.50
DESC-FIRST
BANK-SSALARIES
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-730-4121-010000
11/20/STSTATE
1606:5
21933
11/20/87
ANT-
12.30
DESC-FIRST
ST BANK/MEDICARE
ACCOUNT
NUIIBER-100-4200-031000
8.78
DESC-FIRST
ST BANK./MEDICARE
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-250-4351-031000
AMT-
2.32
DESC-FIRST
ST BANK/MEDICARE
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-250-4352-031000
AMT-
8.39
DESC-FIRST
ST BANK,/MEDICARE
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-250-4354-031000
AMT-
DESC-FIRST
ST BANE:/MEG1 ifiE
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-270-4121-031000
AMT-
.75
4.26
DESC-FIRST
ST BANK/MEDICARE
ACCOUNT
14UMBER-275-4451-031000
AHT-
5.10
DESC-FIRST
ST HANK/MEDICARE
ACCOUNT
HUMBER-700-4121-031000
AMT-
AMT-
108.57
DESC-FIRST
ST BANIC/FICA
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-100-4120-030000
AMT-
201.39
DESC-FIRST
ST BANK/FICA
ACCOUNT
HUMBER-100-4150-030000
211.76
DESC-FIRST
ST BANVIFICA
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-100-4180-080000
- 00-419 0-03000 o
N U MBER 1
AMT-
T-
AMT-
45.25
DESC-FIRST
ST B ANK/FICA
ACCOUNT
ACCOUNT
_ � -
NUMBER-100 423 0 030000
AMT-
�
8...84
DESC-FIRST
DESC F
r CA
�T BANK/FICA
ST BANK/FICA
-
' ACCOUNT
HUMBER-100-4230-C30000
Atli-
44.04
15.01
DESC-FIRST
DESC-FIRST
ST BANK/FICA
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-100-4240-030000
AMT-
82.21
DESC-FIRST
ST BANK/FICA
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-100-4260-030000
AMT-
AMT-
72.07
DEBC-FIkST
ST bANY•/FICA
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-100-427o-030000
206.3c
IRST
DESC_FIRST
ST BAWFICA
4C000NT
NUMBER-100-4350-030000
AMT-
-
AMT-
1 36.0�
EC DS
ST BANK,/FICA
C Cr,OUNT
- 0000
- 03
NUMBER-100 4360
AMT-
39.08
DESC-FIRST
S1 BANK/FICA
-.
ACCOUNT
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-250-4354-030000
NUMBER-700-4120-030000
AMT-
10.39
DESC-FIRST
ST BANK/FICA
a?
4
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-700-4121-080000
AMT-
146.95
DESC-FIRST
DESC-FIkST
ST BAHY./FICA
ST BAI{K/FICADESC-
'
ACCOUNT
NUMB2-730-4120-03P000
AMT-
AMT-
10.39
151.28
BA44185-56
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-730-4121-030000
VENDORFIRST TOTALST
44185'5i
2
P7900 PUB EMPLOYEES RETIREM* 1934
1-/20/87
$8.35
11/20/87 2982.52
DESC-F'EGA - PENSIONS
2982.5;
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-100-4120-033000
AMT-
AMT-
119.71
DESC-PERA
- PENSIONS
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-100-4150-033000
AMT-
79.12
DESC-PERA
- PENSIONS
ACCOUNT
ACCOUNT
HUMNEk-100-4180-033000
NUMBER-100-4190-033000
AMT-
26.89
DESC-PERA
- PE:4SIOI4S
FEHSIOHS
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-I00-4200-033000
AMT-
47.94
2069.45
DESC-PERA
DESC-PERH
-
- PENSIONS
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-100-4200-034000
AMT-
AMT-
8.93
DESC-P'ERA
- PENSIONS
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-100-4240-038000
NUMBER-100-4250-033000
AMT-
48.86
DESC-PERA
- PENSIONS
ACCOUNT
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-100-4270-OVOOO
AMT-
42.34
DESC-PERA
- PENSIONS
PENSIONS
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-100-4350-033000
AMT-
122.67
80.87
DESC-PERA
DESC-PERA
-
- PENSIONS
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-100-4360-033000
AMT-
DESC-PERA
- PENSIONS
ACCOUNT
14UIIBER-250-4354-033000
AMT-
13.24
6.17
DESC-PERA
- PENSIONS
ACCOUNT
HUMBEP-700-4120-033000
NUMBER-700-4120-032000
AMT-
AMr-
41.07
DESC-PERA
- PENSIONS
ACCOUNT
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-700-4121-033000
AMT-
07.35
DESC-PERA
DESC-PERA
- PENSIONS
- PENSIONS
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-730-4120-032000
AMT-
41.07
6.18
DESC-PERA
- PENSIONS
'COUNT
COUNT
HUMBER-730-4120-033000
NUMBER-730-4121-033000
AMT-
AMT-
89.91
PENSIONS
2902.5
VENGORPTOTAL
2982.52
ACCOUNTS
PAYABLE PRE -PAID
CHECK RLGISTEP.
PAOC 3
AP-CIO-02
MOUNDS VIEW
INVOICE
INVOICE UTNT OM
CNEC
VENDOR
CHECK
NUMBER
CHECK
DATE
I14VOICE
NMBR DATE
AMOUUNT
AMOUNT AMOUNT
AMOUR
NO VENDOR
NAME
U7000 UHIVERSTTY OF MINHESO>t 21935
11l23/87
11/23187
DESC-UNIV OF MN/TRAINING
30.00
30.0
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-100-4120-363000
AMT-
30.00
VENDOR TOTAL
30.00
30.0
FIRE* 2193o
S6250 SPRING LAKE PARK FIRE
I1/24/07
11/24/87
DESC-SPR LK PIt FIR-c/CONTINGENCY
4600.00
FD
4600.01
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-100-4210-390000
AMT- 4600.00
VENDOR TOTAL 4600.00
4600.01
72301 SCIENCE
MUSEUM OF MINA 21937
11/24/87
11/24/87
DESC-SCIENCE MUSEUM/SCHOOL'S
72. 00
OUT
72.01
r;.
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-250-4351-35207.1
AMT-
72.00
VENDOR TOTAL
72.00
72.0
E
74260 CHUCKACCOUNT
CHEESE 21938
11/24/87
11/24/87
DESC-CHUCK E CHEESE/SCHDUI.'S
111.90
OUT
111.8
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-250-4^a51-352021
ANT-
111.80
VENDOR TOTAL
111.80
111.81
M2075 MENARD5
21939
11/25/87
039155
11/25/87
DESC-MENARD5/GARAGE
346.95
ADDITN SUPPLIES
346.9!
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-475-4121-705000
ANT-
346.95
846.95
346.9'
VENDOR TOTAL
tij
M467.`-'4IHNESOTA MUTUAL LIFE 21940
11/30/97
11/30/87
DESC-MINN MUTUAL
17.00
- DEC INS PREMIUM
17;G1
p:
\_.000UNT
NUMBER-100-4120-041000
AMT-
3.40
DESC-MINN MUTUAL
- DEC INS PREMIUM
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-100-4180-041000
AMT-
3.40
10.20
DESC-MINN MUTUAL
- DEC INS PREMIUM
ACCOUNT
MUMBER-100-4200-041000
AMT-
VENDOR TOTAL
17.00
17• 01
2
L0250 LMCIT HEALTH PfiOTECTI>; 1941
0
I1/..0/87
11/30/87
UPC
460.18
INS PRE73UM
460.11
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-100-4120-040000
AMT-
71.52
DESC-LMCIT -
DEC
±iREMIJM
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-100-4200-040000
AMT-
214.56
DESC-Lr`'IT
DESC-Lli.J - DEC
I.,S PREMIUM
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-100-4180-040000
AMT-
1.74.10
460.i8
460.I1
:'E!IDOR TOTAL
PAM ROSE 21942
12/01/87
110487
12/01/87
73.00
73.01
IR5950
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-100-4110-020000
AMT-
70.00
DESC-VENDORPAM TOTAOSE/li/0478700
73.01
GROUP HEALTH PLAN, INx 174..0 12/0../87 0 12/02/87 4508.65 4508.6'
ACCOUNT NUMBER-100-4120-040000 AMT- 87.30 DESC-GROUP HEALTH/DEC I14S PREMIUM
ACCOUNT NUMBER-100-4150-040000 AMT- 436.50 DESC-GROUP HEALTH/DEC INS PREMIUM
ACCOUNT NUMBER-100-4180-040000 AMT- 22B.22 DESC.-GROUP IIEALTH/DEC INS PREMIUM
ACCOUNT NUMBER-100-4190-040000 AMT- 82.15 DESC-GROUP HEALTH/DE' INS PREMIUM
ACCOUNT NUMBER-100-4200-040000 AIIT- 1786.00 DESC-GROUP HEALTH/DEC INS PREMIUM
ACCOUNT NUMBER-100-4230-040000 AMT- 87.30 DESC-GROUP HEALTH/DEC INS PREMIUM
ACCOUNT NUMBER-100-4260-040000 AMT- 172.10 DESC-GROUT HEALTH/DEC INS PREMIUM
ACCOUNT NUMBER-100-4270-040000 AMT- 172.10 DESC-GROUP HEALTH/DEC INS PREMIUM
ACCOUNT NUMBER-100-4350-040000 A117- 349.20 DESC-GROUP HEALTH/DEC INS PREMIUM
:COUNT NUMBER-100-4360-040000 AMT- 172.10 DESC-GROUP HEALTH/DEC INS PREMIUM
ACCOUNT NUMbEk-700-4120-040000 AMT- 148.64 DESC-GROUP HEALTH/DEC INS PREMIUM
DESC-GROUP 11EALTH/DEC INS PREMIUM
ACCOUNT
ACCOUNT NUMBER-730-4120-040000 AMT- 148.64 OE5C-GROUP HEALTH/DEC TNS PREMIUM
PAr.' 4
ACCOUNTS
PAYABLE PRE -PAID CHECK
REGISTER
AP-CIO-02
MOUNDS VIEW
VENDOR CHECK CHECK,
INVOICE INVOICE
DISCOUNT
CHEi
NO VENDOR NAME NUMBER
DATE
INVOICE NMBR DATE AMOUNT AMOUI4T
AMOUI
ACCOUNT NUMBER-730-4121-040000
AMT-
344.20 DESC-GROUP HEALTH/DEC
INS PREMIUM
VENDOR TOTAL 4508.65
4508.1
F3636 1ST STATE BANK OF NEWx 21944 12/04/87
12/04/07 43482.41
43482:
ACCOUNT NUI'iBER-100-4100-010000
AMT-
1150.00 DESC-FIRST STATE BANK,
SALARIES
ACCOUNT NUMBER-100-4120-010000
AMT-
1830.91
DESC-FIRST STATE BANK
SALARIES
ACCOUNT NUMBER-100-4150-010000
AMT-
2814.30
DESC-FIRST STATE BANE;
SALARIES
ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4180-010000
AMT-
3015.56
DESC-FIRST STATE BANK
SALARIES
ACCOUNT NUMBER-100-4190-010000
AMT-
632.80
DESC-FIRST STATE BANK,
SALARIES
ACCOUNT NUMBER-100-4200-010000
AMT-
17738.63
DESC-FIRST STATE BANE;
SALARIES
ACCOUNT NUMBER-100-4200-011000
Al•IT-
541.62
DESC-FIRST STATE BANK,
SALARIES
ACCOUNT NUMBER- 100-4200-020000
AMT-
384.56
DESC-FIRST STATE BANK
SALARIES
ACCOUNT NUMBER-100-4230-010000
AM'.-
°28.49
DESC-FIRST STATE BANK.
SALARIES
ACCOUNT NUMBER-100-4260-010000
AMT-
1008.00
DESC-FIRST STATE BANI.
SALARIES
ACCOUNT NUMBER-100-4270-010000
AMT-
1008.00
DESC-FIRST STATE BANK
SALARIES
ACCOUNT NUMBER-100-4350-010000
AMT-
2396.00
DESC-FIRST STATE BANK,
SALARIES
ACCOUNT NUMBER-100-4350-020000
AMT-
230.76
DIE3C-FIRST STATE BANK
SALARIES
ACCOUNT NUMBER-100-4360-010000
AMT-
1772.48
DESC-FIRST SIATE BANK
SALARIES
ACCOUNT NUMBER-100-4360-02C000
AMT-
168.60
DESC-FIRST STATE BANK,
SALARIES
ACCOUNT NUMBER-750-4?51-MIA/3
AMT-
240 00
ESC-`I
C r'�T �TnTc oniil.
SALARIES
ES
,
``-`)CCOUNT NUMBER-250-4351-020021
AMT-
285.00
DES6-FIRST STATE BANK
SALARIES
�- CCOUNT NUMBEP,-250-4351-020042
ANT-
70.00
DESC-FIRST STATE BANK
SALARIES
ACCOUNT NUMBER-250-4852-304104
AMT-
10.00
DESC-FIRST STATE BANK
SALARIES
ACCOUNT NUMBER-250-4353 304206
AMT-
7.50
DESC-FIRST STATE BANK,
SALARIES
it
ACCOUNT NUMBER-250-4354-020226
AMT-
42.00
DESC-FIRST STATE BANK
SALARIES
?'
ACCOUNT NUMBER-250-4354-620229
AMT-
40.31
DESC-FIRST SPATE BANK
SALARIES
ACCOUNT NUMBER-100-4240-020000
AMT-
210.00
DESC-FIRST STATE BANK
SALARIES
ACCOUNT 4UMBER-250-4354-020230
AMT-
7.50
DESC-FIRST STATE BANK
SALARIES
ACCOUNT NUMBER-250-43�' 020231
AMT-
15.75
DESC-FIRST STATE BANK
SALARIES
ACCOUNT NUMBER-250-4354-020233
AMT-
116.13
DESC-FIRST STATE BANK
SALARIES
ACCOUNT NUMBER-250-4354-020234
AMT-
254.00
DESC-FIRST STATE BANK
SALARIES
ACCOUNT NUMBER-2.50-4354-020237
AMT-
81.25
DESC-FIRST STATE BANE;
SALARIES
ACCOUNT NUMBER-250-4354-020238
AMT-
7.50
DESC-FIRST STATE BANK
SALARIES
ACCOUNT NUMBER-250-4354-020239
AMT-
%.00
DESC-FIRST STATE BANK
SALARIES
ACCOUNT NUMDER-250-4354-L,20244
AMT-
72.66
DESC-FIRST STATE BANK,
SALARIES
ACCOUNT NUMBER-250-4354-020246
AMT-
12.50
DESC-FIRST STATE BAN'(,
SALARIES
ACCOUNT NUMBER-250-4354-020250
AMT-
74.25
DESC-FIRST STATE BANK
SALARIES
ACCOUNT NUMBER-250-4354-020253
APIT-
65.94
DESC-FIRST STATE BANK
SR'ARTFS
ACCOUNT NUMBER-250-4354-020254
AMT-
7.50
DESC-FIRST STATE BANE;
SALARIES
ACCOUNT NUMBER-290-4354-020255
AMT-
55.12
DESC-FIRST STATE BANK
SALARIES
ACCOUNT NUMBER-250-4354-020256
AMT-
49.B8
DESC-FIRST STATE BANK,
SALARIES
ACCOUNT NUMDER-250-4354-020260
AMT-
278.69
DESC-FIRST STATE BANK
SALARIES
ACCOUNT NUMBER-275-4451-020000
AMT-
114.75
DESC-FIRST STATE BANK
SALARIES
ACCOUNT NUMBER-700-4120-010000
AMT-
535.35
DESC-FIRST STATE BAN✓,
SALARIES
ACCOUNT NUMBER-700-4121-010000
AMT- 2016.00
DESC-FIRST STATE DANK
SALARIES
ACCOUNT NUMBER-700-4121-020000
AMT-
291.50
DESC-FIRST STATE BANKSALARIES
�ICOUNT NUMBER-730-4120-010000
ANT-
535.'S
DESC-FIRST STATE BANK,
SALARIES
ACCOUNT NUMBER-730-4121-010000
AMT- 2104.50
DESC-FIRST STATE BANK
SALARIES
ACCOUNT IIUMBER-730-4121-020000
AMT-
201.75
DESC-FIRST STATE BANK.
SALARIES
21945 12/04/87
12/04/87 1514.20
1514.28
1GE 5
ACCOUNTS
PAYABLE PRE -PAID
CHECK REGISTER
1-C10-02
MOUNDS VIEW
ENDDR
CHECK
CHECK
INVOICE
INVOICE DISCOUNT
CHECI`
NO VENDOR
NAME NUMBER
DATE
INVOICE NMBR DATE
AMOUNT AMOUNT
AMOUNT:
ALCOUNT
NUMBER-100-4100-0316vO
AMT-
3.26
DESC-FIRST STATE
RANK/MEDICARE
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-100-4200-031000
AMT-
12.48
DESC-FIRST STATE
BANK/MEDICARE
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-250-4851-031000
AMT-
8.63
DES, -FIRST STATE
BANK/MEDICARE
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-250-4352-031000
AMT-
.14
DESC-FIRST STATE
BANK/MEO'CARE
ACCOUNT
HUMBER-250-4353-091000
AMT-
.12
DESC-FIRST STATE
HANK/MEDICARE
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-250-4354-031000
AMT-
9.08
DESC-FIRST STATE
BANK/MEDICARE
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-275-4451-031000
AMT-
1.66
DESC-FIRST STATE
BANK/MEDICARE
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-700-4121-031000
AMT-
4.23
DESC-FIRST STATE
BANK/MEDICARE
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-100-4120-030000
AMT-
64.52
DESC-FIRST STATE
BANK/FICA
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-100-4150-CSOOOO
AMT-
201.22
DESC-FIRST STATE
BANK/FICA
ACCOUNT
NUIIBFR-100-4180-030000
AMT-
215.61
DESC-FIRST STATE
BANK/FICA
ACCOUNT
NU11BER-100-4190-030000
AMT-
45.25
DESC-FIRST STATE
BANK/FICA
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-100-4200-080000
AMT-
88.74
DESC-FIRST STATE
BANK/FICA
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-100-4240-030000
AMT-
15.02
DESC-FIRST STATE.
BANK/FICA
ACCOUNT
14UMDER-100-4260-030000
AMT-
72.07
DESC-FIRST STALE
BANK/FICA
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-100-4270-0'.0000
AMT-
72.07
DESC-FIRST STATE
BANK/FICA
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-100-4350-030000
AMT-
187.81
DESC-FIR.. STATE
BANK/FICA
ACCOUNT
NU"nBER-100 4360-030000
AhiT-
1?R.79
C_SC-FJRST STATE
BANIVFICA
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-250-4354-030000
AMT-
43.92
DESC-FIRST STATE
BAHI;/FICA
COUNT
NUHDER-700-4120-030000
AMT-
10.31
DESC-FIRST STATE
DANK./FICA
'-ACCOUNT
NUMBER-700-4121-030000
AMT-
144.14
DESC-FIRST STATE
BANK/FICA
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-730-4120-030000
AMT-
10.81
DESC-FIRST STATE
BANK/FICA
ACCOUNT
14UMBER-730-4121-030000
AMT-
164.90
DESC-IRST STATE BANK,/FICA
VENDOR TOTAL 44996.69
44996.6
050 ICMA RETIREMENT CORPO* 21946
12/04/87
12/04/87
157.84
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-100-4120-035000
AMT-
7R.92
DESC-ICMA/PENSIONS
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-100-42SO-035000
AMT-
78.92
DESC-ICi1A/PENSIONS
VENDOR TOTAL
157.84
157.8
116 ROBERT JOHNSON
ASSOCIN 21947
12/04/87
12/04/87
500.00
500.0
ACCOL114T
NUMBEP,-100-2?03-000809
AMT-
500.00
DESC-ROBERT JOHNSON-JLN
VENDOR TOTAL
500.00
500.0.
300 U 8 POSTMASTER
21948
12/07/87
12/07/87
420.81
420.8'
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-100-4350-530000
AMT-
420.91
DESC-U S POSTAL SERVICE
VENDOR TOTAL
420.81
420.0
)25 COTTENS
IHC 21949
12/07/87
S-774792
12/07/87
82.46
82.4
ACCOUNT
HUMBER-100-4260-122000
AMT-
44.40
DESC-COTTEN'S/SUPPLIES
ACCOUNT
NIIMBER-100-4260-122000
AMT-
3B.06
DESC-COTTEN'S/SUPPLIES
VENDOR TOTAL
82.46
82•t
)75 MEHAROS
21950
12/07/87
1?998
12/07/87
878.81
878.6
'COLINT
NUMDER-100-4560-121000
AMT-
878.81
DESC-MENARDS/DOORS
VENDOR TOTAL
878.81
078.E
102 DONATELLE'5
21951
12/07/87
12/07/07
222.50
222.E
ACCOUNT
4UMDER-250-4552-$90130
AMT-
222.50
DESC-DDNATELLE'S/SENIOR CHRISTMAS
VENDOR TOTAL
222.50
222.E
0E 6
AUOUNTS
PfYABLE PRE -PAID
CHECK REGISTER
-C10-02
MOUNDS VIEW
HDOR
CHECK
CHECK
INVOICE
INVOICE
DISCOUNT
CHECK
NO VENDOR
NAME NUMBER
DATE
INVOICE
NMPR DATE
AMOUNT
AMOUNT
AMOUNI
425 FIDELITY & GUARANTY L* 21953
1210B/87
12/01/87
67.00
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-100-4120-041000
AMT-
1.45
DESC-FIDELITY
& GUARANTY/DEC
INS
ACCOUNT
14UMBER-100-4150-04100J
AMT-
7.26
DESC-FIDELITY
& C'1ARANTY/DEC
INS
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-100-4180-041000
AMT-
6.76
DESC-FIDELITY
& GUARANTY/DEC
INS
z.
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-100-4190-041000
AMT-
2.90
DESC-FIDELITY
& GUARANTY/DEC
INS
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-100-4200-041000
AMT-
34.80
DESC-FIDELITY
& GUARANIY/DEC
INS
{
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-100-4260-041000
AMT-
2.90
DESC-FIDELITY
& GUARANTY/DEC
INS
-
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-100-4270-041000
AMT-
2.90
DESC•FIDELITY
Z GUARANTY/DEC
INS
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-100-4230-041000
AMT-
1.45
DESC-FIDELITY
& GUARANTY/DEC
INS
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-100-4350-041000
AMT-
5.80
DESC-FJDELITY
& GUARANTY/DEC
INS
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-100-4360-041000
AMT-
2.90
DESC-FIDELITY
& GUARANTY/DEC
INS
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-700-4120-041000
AMT-
3.14
DESC-FIDELITY
& GUARANTY/DEC
INS
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-700-4121-041000
AMT-
5.80
DESC-FIDELITY
& GUARANIY/DEC
INS
ACCOUNT
NUMBEP-730-4120-041000
AMT-
3.14
DESC-FIDELITY
& GUARANTY/DEC
INS .
ACCOUNT
NUMBER-730-4121-041000
AMT-
5.80
DESC-FIDELITY
& GUARANTY/DEC
INS
VE"'IR TOTAL
87.00
874C
2135 NFRMAID BOWLING LANES 21954 12/08/87
COUNT NUMBER-100-3912-000000 AMT- 72.50
21955 12/08/87
ACCOUNT NUMBER-100-3912-000000 AMT- 93.60
0680 DONALD PAULEY 21957 12/07/87
ACCOUNT NUMBER-100-4190-114000 AMT- 125.01
12/08/87 72.50
- 72.5C
DESC-MERMAID/EMPLOYEE BOWLING
t+
12/08/87 93.60
93.6t
DESC-MERMAID/EMPLOYEE CHRISTMAS PTY
VENBOR TOTAL 166.10
166.1
12/09/87 125.01
125.01
UESC-11ONALD PAUI.EY/HEATERS
VENDOR TOTAL 125.01
125.01
GRAND TOTAL 105315.88
105315.Bf
Sixth Dr f ,
HU125-3
CONTRACT
FOR
PRIVATE REDEVELOPMENT
By and Between
( THE CITY OF 19OUNDS VIEW] MINNESOTA
EVEREST DEVELOPMENT, LTD.
And
COMMERCIAL PROPERTY INVESTMENTS, INC.
This document was drafted by:
HOLMES h GRAVEN, Chartered
470 Pillsbury Center
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
ARTICLE I
Definitions
Section 1.1. Definitions
ARTICLE iI
Representations and Warranties
Sec'ior 2.1. Representations by the City
Section 2.2. Representations and Warranties by the
Redeveloper
Section 2.3. Redeveloper's Liability Joint and Several
ARTICLE III
Acquisition and Conveyance of Prooertyl Public improvements
Section 3.1.
Current Status of Redevelopment Prop.: ty
10
Section 3.2.
Acquisition of Redevelopment Property
11
Section 3.3.
Conveyance of the Redevelopment Property
11
Section 3.4.
Time of Conveyance
11
Section 3.5.
Title
12
Section 3.6.
Public improvements
12
Section 3.7.
Financing City Activities
13
Section I.e.
Dedication of City Financial Assistance
15
Section 3.9.
issuancl- of Bonds, Use of Bond Proceeds
15
ARTICLE IV
Construction of Minimum improvements
Section 4.1.
Construction of Minimum Improvements
17
Section 4.2.
Construction Plans
17
Section 4.3.
Commencement and Completion of Construction
18
Section 4.4.
Certificate of Completion
19
Section 4.5.
Development Letter of Credit
20
Section 4.6.
Phases
20
ARTICLE V
insurance and Condemnation
Section 5.1.
Insurance
22
Section 5.2.
Condemnation
25
ARTICLE VI
Tax increment
Section 6.1.
Tax Guarantee
26
Section 6.2.
Tax Increment Certification.
27
Section 6.3.
Real Property Taxes
27
Section 6.4.
Assessment Agreement
28
ARTICLE Vil
Financin
Section 7.1.
Financing
29
Section 7.2.
LimItation Upon Encumbrance of Property
29
Section 7.3.
Approval of Mortgage
29
' Section 7.4.
Copy of Notice of Defacit to Mortgagee
30
Section 7.5.
Mortgagee's Option to Cure Defaults
30
Section 7.6.
City's Option to Cure Default on Mortgage
30
Section 7.7.
Subordination and Modification for the
Benefit of Mortgagees.
31
ARTICLE Vlll
Prohibitions Against Assignment and Transfer; Indemnification
Section 8.1.
Representation as to Redevelopment
32
Section 8.2.
Prohibition Against Transfer of Property and
Assignment of Agreement
32
Section 8.3.
Release and indemnification Covenants
33
ARTICLE IX
Events of Default
Section 9.1.
Events of Default Defined
35
Section 9.2.
Remedies on Default
36
Section 9.3.
Revesting Title in City Upon Happening of
Event Subsequent to Conveyance to Redevelop:r
36
Section 9.4.
Resale of Reacquired Property; Disposition of
Proceeds
38
Section 9.5.
No Remedy Exclusive
39
Section 9.6.
No Additional Waiver implied by One Waiver
39
n
ARTICLE X
Additional Provisions
Section 10.1. Conflict of Interestsl City Representatives
Not Individually Liable
4d
Section 10.2.
Equal Employment Opportunity
40
Section 10.3.
Restrictions on Use
40
Section 10.4.
Provisions Not Merged With Deed
40
Section 10.5.
Tl:les of Articles and Sections
40
Section 10.6.
Notices and Demands
40
Seetlon 10.7
Counterparts
41
ARTICLE XI
Termination of Agreement
Section 11.1.
Termlmition of Agreement 42
Section 11.2.
Effective Termination 42
SIGNATURES
43
SCHEDULE A
Description of Redevelopment P•°operty r- -
SCHEDULE B
Quit Claim Deed
SCHEDULE C
Assessment Agreement and Assessor's CertlNeation
SCHEDULE D
Certificate c: Completion and Release of Forfeiture
SCHEDULH E
Permitted Encumbrances
SCHEDULE F
Irrevocable Letter of Credit
SCHEDULE G
Contract for Deed
SCHEDULE H
Site Plan
SCHEDULE I
Description of Public Improvements
SCHEDULE J
Construction Schedule for Public Improvements
SCHEDULE K
Form of Opinion of Redeveloper's Legal Counsel
CONTRACTFOR
PRIVATR REDEVELOPMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, made on or as of the day of ,
1987, by and between The City of Mounds View (the "City'), a home rule city of the
State of Minnesota, having its principal offices at 2401 Highway 10, Mounds View,
Minnesota 55112 and Everest Development, Ltd., a Minnesota corporation with its
principal office at 2685 Long Lake Road, °oseville. Minnesota 551131 and
Commercial Property Investments, inc., R Minnesota Corporation, with its principle
office at 2685 Long Lake Road, Roseville, Minnesota 55113 (Everest Development,
Ltd., and Commercial Property investments being collectively referred to herein as
"Redeveloper').
WITNESSETHr
WHEREAS, the City is a home rule charter city organized and existing
pursuant to the Constitution and Iaws of the State of Minnesota and its charter and
Is governed by the Council of the City; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Municipal Development Districts Act, Minnesota
Statutes, Sections 469.124 to 469.134, as amended, the Council Is authorized to
establish development districts in order to provide for the development and
redevelopment of the City; and
'Y WHEREAS, pursuant to the Minnesota Tax inere.aent Financing Act,
Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.174 to 469.179, as amended, the Councl! is
authorized to finance the capital and administration costs of a development
district with tax Increment revenues derived from a tax Increment financing
district established within such development district; and
WHEREAS, the Council of the City has established Development District
Number 2 (the "Development Distract") pursuant to the Mumicipal Development
Districts Act; and
WHEREAS, In conneci.o• -pith the Development District, the City Council
of the City has created a tax Increment financing district (the "Tax Increment
District') pursuant to the Minnesota Tax increment Financing Act; and
WHEREAS, In connection with the Tax Increment District the Council of the
City has prepared and approved a tax increment financing plan (which tax
Increment financing plan, together with the Development District plan is
hereinafter referred to as the "Plan'); and
WHEREAS, the major objectives of the Council in establishing the
Development District are to; acquire land or space which is vacant, unused,
underused, or inappropriately used; eliminate or correct physical deterrents to the
development of land; acquire property containing structurally substandard buildings
and remove structurally substandard buildings for which rehabilitation is not
feasible; eliminate blighting influences which Impede potential development;
provide adequate streets, sidewalks, and other public improvements to enhance the
area for new development; achieve a high level of design and landscaping q�lr lty to
enhance the phys;eal environment; provide emp!oyment opportunities through the
creation of new Jobs; improve the financial base of the City and State; coordinate
elements of the City's Comprehensive Plan with these project objectives; and
provide maximum opportunity, consistent with the needs of the City, for
development by private enterprise; and
WHEREAS, in order to achieve the objectives of the Coun:il In creating the
Development District the City is prepared to acquire certain real property located
In the Development District (such real property is more particularly described In
Schedule A to this Agreement), to construct certain public Improvements thereon,
and to convey such reel property to the Redeveloper for development and
redevelopment in accordance with this Agreement; and
WHEREAS, in order to achieve the foregoing the City has determined to
provide substantial aid and amistance throne, the sale of "nds; and
WHEREAS, the City believes that the development and redevelopment of
the Development District pursuant to this Agreement, and fulfillment generally of
the terms of this Agreement, are in the vital and best Interests of the City and the
health, safety, morals and welfare of its residents, and in accord with the public
purposes and previsions of applicable federal, state and local laws under which the
Development District and Program Is being undertaken and assisted;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual
obligations of the parties hereto, each of them does hereby covenant and agree
with the other as follows: (�
ARTICLE I
Definitlons
Section I.I. Definitions. In this Agreement, unless a different meaning
clearly appears from the context:
"Act" means the Municipal Development Districts Act, Minnesota Statutes,
Sections 469.124 to 489.134, as amended.
"Agreement" means this Agreement, as the same may be from time to time
modified, amended, or supplemented.
"Assessed Market Value' nr "Assessed Market Valuation" means the market
value of real property as determined by the county assessor of the County in
accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.11 (or as finally adjusted by any
assessor, board of equalization, commissioner of revenue, or any court).
"Assessment Agreement" means each agreement, in the form of the agree-
ment contained in Schedule C attached to and made a part of this Agreement,
among the Redeveloper, the City, and the county assessor of the County, entered
Into pursuant to Section 6.4 of this Agreement.
"Assessor's Minimum Market Value" means the agreed minimum market
value of any Phase of the Redevelopment Property for calculation of real property
taxes as determined by the county assessor for the County pursuant to the
Assessment Agreement.
"Bonds" means the bonds or other obligations Issued by the City to finance
Its acquisition of the Redevelopment Property, construction of the Public
Improvements, and its other costs hereunder (and costs related to such acquisition
and construction). The term "Bonds" shall also include any bonds or obligations
Issued to refund any Bonds.
"Certificate of Completion" means the certification, in the form of the
certificate contained in Schedule D attached to and made a part of this
Agreement, provided to the Redeveloper, or the purchaser of any pert, parcel or
unit of the Redevelopment Property, pursuant to Section 4.4 of this Agreement.
"City" means the City of Mounds View; Minnesota, or its successors or
assigns.
"Construction Plans" means the plans, specifications, drawings and relates.
documents on the construction work to be performed by the Redeveloper on the
Redevelopment Property which (a) shall be as detailed as the plans, specifications,
drawings and related documents which are submitted to the Building Official of the
City, and (b) shall include at least the following for each building. (1) site plan; (2)
foundation plan; (3) basement plans; (4) floor plan for each floor; (5) cross sections
of each (length and width); (6) elevations (all sides, except as to a side of existing
structure where no construction is to take place), (7) facade and landscape plan;
and (8) such other plans or supplements to the foregoing plans as the City may
reasonably request.
"Contract for Deed" means that certain "Contract for Deed," a copy of
which is attached hereto as Schedule G dated December 31, 1986, between Russell
H. Underdahl and Elaine Underdehl, as vendors, and JLN Development, Inc., a
Minnesota corporation, as vendee, providing for the sale of the majority of the
Redevelopment Property, the vendee's Interest under which Contract for Deed has,
as of the date hereof, been assigned by JLN Development, Inc., to Commercial
Property Investments, Inc., a Minnesota corporation.
"County" means the County of Remsey, Minnesota.
"Developer's Agreement" means the agreement dated ,
between the Redeveloper and the City, including all exhibits thereto, as the same
may be amended from time to time.
"Development District" means Development District No. 2 created by the
City pursuant to the Act through the adoption of the Plan on September 22, 1986.
"Event of Default" means an action by the Redeveloper described in Section
9.1 of this Agreement.
"Guarantee Letter of Credit" means the letter of credit required to be
provided by the Redeveloper pursuant to Section 6.1 of this Agreement.
"Holder" means the grantee under any Mortgage.
"Maturity Date" means the earlier of December 31, 2011, or the date when 5..
the principal of, premium (if any), and Interest on the Bonds are paid in full.
"Minimum Improvements" means the Improvements to be constructed by the
Redeveloper or. the Redevelopment Property which improvements are described in
the Developer's Agreement.
"Minnesota Environmental Policy Act" means the statutes located at Min-
nesota Statutes, Sections 116D.01 et sew., as amended.
"Minnesota Environmental Rights Act" means the statutes located at
Minnesota Statutes, Sections 116B.01 et sag., as amended.
"Mortgage" means an; mortgage made by the Redeveloper which is secured,
In whole or in part, with the Redevelopment Property and which is a permitted
encumbrance pursuant to the provisions of Article Vill of this Agreement.
"Net Proceeds" means any proceeds paid bi an insurer to the Redeveloper or
the City under a policy or policies of insurance required to be provided and
maintained by the Redeveloper pursuant to Article V of this Agreement and
remaining after deducting all expenses (including fees and disbursements of
couns-1) incurred in the collection of such proceeds.
"National Environmental Policy Act" means the federal law located at 42
U.S.C. SS 4331 et seq., as amended.
"Parcel" means a portion of the Redevelopment Property upon which a
Phase is to be constructed by the Redeveloper.
"Permitted Encumbrancea" means the encumbrances described in Schedule E
of this Agreement.
"Phase" means a separate, segmented stage of the development of the
Minimum Improvements on the Redevelopment Property, consisting of specific
Minimum
in Section improvements to
of this Agreement.
cifisParcel of the Redevelopment Poperty, all as
prov4.
"Program" means the Development Program adopted by the City in
connection with the creation of the Development District, as it may be amended
or modified from time to time.
"Public Improvements" means the improvements to be constructed pursuant
to Section 3.5 of this Agreement in connection with the Redeveloper's development
of the Minimum Improvements hereunder.
"Redemption Date" raeans the earliest date on which any Bonds may be
redeemed and paid prior to full maturity.
"Redeveloper" means collectively Everest Development, Ltd., a Minnesota
corporation, and Commercial Property investments, inc., a Minnesota corporation,
and their successors or assigns.
"Redevelopment Property" neans the real property upon which the Minimum
improvements are to be constructed, which real property is described on Schedule
A of this Agreement.
"plan:: means, coilectively, the tex increment financing plan and
development isadethe inlrespectively.connection
tcreation of
he Tax IncrementDitrictnthe Development District,
"Redevelopment Property Deed" means a quit claim deed, substantially in
of
Redevelopmenthep Property, or each
BParcel 1 thereof, m from usthe ed t convey deed In Cityto the
Redeveloper.
"Site Plan" means the plan attached hereto as Schedule H showing the
proposed nature and location of the Minimum Improvements.
"State" means the State of Minnesota.
"Tax Increment" means that portion of the real estate taxes paid with
respect to the Redevelopment Property which is remitted to the City as tax
increment pursuant to the Tax increment Act.
"Tax Increment Act" means the Tax Increment Financing Act, Minnesota
Statutes, Sections 469.174 to 469.179, as amended and as It may be amended.
"Tax increment District" means the Tax Increment Financing District
created by the Council within the Development District through Its adoption on
September 22, 1986, of a tax increment financing plan pursuant to the Tax
Increment Act.
"Tax official" means any City
County or State board of equalization,
or any State or federal district court,
Supreme Court.
or county assessor; County auditor; City,
the commiss!,jner of revenue of the State,
the tax court of the State, or the State
"Unavoidable Delays" means delays which are the direct result of strikes,
le casualties to
theeyMinimum improvements, are the dl"ect s the ult f Public slmprovementaeeable and nvthebRedevelopment
Property or the equipment used to construct the Minimum improvements or Public
Improvements, delays which are the direct result of governmental action, delays
which are the direct result of Judicial action commenced by third parties, citizen
opposition or action affecting this Agreement or adverse weather condlliona or
acts of Cod.
r
j
ARTICLE U
Representations and Warranties
Section 2.1 Representations by the City. The City makes the following
representations as the basis for the undertaking on its part herein containeds
(a) The City Is a home rule city duly organized and existing under the
laws of the State. Under the provisions of its charter and the Act, the City has .
the power to enter Into this Agreement and carry out Its obligations hereunder.
(b) The City has created, adopted and approved the Development
District In accordance with the terms of the Act.
(c) The City has created, adopted, certified, and approved the Tax
increment District pursuant to the Tax Increment Act.
(d) The City proposes to (1) acquire the Redevelopment Property and to
convey the Redevelopment Property to the Redeveloper for ::oes In accordance
with the Plan ane this Agreement, and (it) construct or cause to be constructed the
Public improvements.
(e) To finance the costs of the activities to be undertaken by the City,
the City proposes to use the proceeds of Bonds Issued by the City, together with
interest earnings thereon, and to pledge tax increment generated by the
Redevelopment Property to the payment of the principal of and interest on the
Bonds.
(f) The City will cooperate with the Redeveloper with respect to any
litigation commenced by third parties in connection with this Agreement.
Section 2.2. Representations and Warranties by the Redeveloper. The
Redeveloper represents and warrants that:
(a) In the event the Redevelopment Property is conveyed to the Rede-
veloper, then the Redeveloper will construct, operate and maintain the Minimum
Improvements in accordance with the terms of this Agreement, the Developer's
Agreement, the Plan and all local, state and federal laws and regulations
(including, but not limited to, environmental, zoning, building code and public
health laws and regulations), except for variances necessary to construct the
improvements contemplated in the Construction Plans approved by the City.
(b) The Minimum improvements, as of the date hereof, constitute an
allowed use under the zoning ordinance of the City.
(c) At such time or times as will be required by law, the Redeveloper
will have complied with all applicable local, state and federal environmental laws
and regulations, and will have ;btained any and all necessary environmental
reviews, licenses or clearances under (anj is in compliance with the requirements
of) the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, the Minnesota Environmental
Policy Act, and the Critical Areas Act of 1973. As of the date of execution of this
Agreement, the Redeveloper has received no notice or communication from any
local, state or federal official that the activities of the Redeveloper or the City in
the Development District may be or will be in violation of any environments) law
or regulation. As of the date of execution of this Agreement, the Redeveloper Is
aware of no facts, the existence of which would cause It to be in violation of any
local, state or federal environmental law, regulation or review procedure or which
would give any person a valid claim under the Minnesota Environmental Rights Act.
(e) The Redeveloper will construct the Minimum Improvements In
accordance with all applicable local, state or federal energy -conservation laws or
regulations.
(f) The Redeveloper will obtain, in a timely manner, all required
permits, licenses and approvals, and will meet, In a timely manner, all
requirements of all applicable local, state and federal taws and regulations which
must be obtained or met before the Minimum Improvements may be lawfully
constructed.
(g) Everest Development, Ltd. Is a Minnesota corporation organized and
existing under the lays of the State, has duly authorized the execution of this
Agreement and the performance of Its obligations hereunder, and neither the
execution and delivery of this Agreement, the consummation of the transactions
contemplated hereby, nor the fulfillment of or compliance with the terms and
conditions of this Agreement is prevented, limited by or conflicts with or results in
a breach of, the terms, conditions or provisions of its articles of incorporation,
bylaws, any evidences of indebtedness, agreement or instrument of whatever
nature to which Everest Development, Ltd. is now a party or by which it Is bound,
or constitutes a default under any of the foregoing.
(h) Commercial Property Investments, Inc., is a Minnesota corporation,
organized and existing under the laws of the State, has duly authorized the
execution of this Agreement and the performance of its obligations hereunder, and
either the execution and delivery of this Agreement, the consummation of the
transactions contemplated hereby, nor the fulfillment of or compliance with the
terms and conditions of this Agreement is prevented, limited by or conflicts with
or results in a breach of, the terms, conditions or provisions of Its articles of
Incorporation, by-laws, any evidences of indebtedness, agreement or instrument of
whatever nature to which Commercial Property Investments is now a party or by
which it is bound, or constitutes a default under any of the foregoing.
(1) The Redeveloper agrees that it will cooperate with the City with
respect to any litigation commenced by third parties in connection with this
Agreement—.
0) In the event that this Agreement is terminated as a result of a Event
of Default by Redeveloper, the Redeveloper shall pay to the City, within ten (19)
days of demand by the City, all of the City's costs incurred in confection with the
issuance of the Bonds, the preparation and Implementation of this Agreement,
Including but not limited to, the costs of acquiring the Redevelopment Property
and preparing plans and specifications for the Public Improvements, and any costs
or damages incurred by the City as a result of such default.
(k) Whenever any Event of Default occurs and the City shall employ �0
attorneys or Incur other expenses for the collection of payments due or to become
aue or for the enforcement of performance or observance of any obligation or
agreement on the part of the Redeveloper under this Agreement, the Redeveloper
agrees that
within ten
ptdemand by the pnay to the
Cythreasoaa fees of suchatoreys and such a herexpenses soicurredby
the City.
(1) The financing arrangements which the Redeveloper has obtained, or
will inimum Imp
mentst
together with acquisitionn, to finance rconstruction
with financing providedbytheCity pursuant to tthis Agreement,ewin be
sufficient to enable the Redeveloper to successfully complete the Minimum
Improvements as contemplated in this Agreement.
(m) The Redeveloper would notundertake
by City construction of the Minimum this
improvements without the financing p
Agreement.
(n) The Redeveloper believes that the fair warket value of the
Redevelopment Property is, or w"! be prior to Its conveyance to the City, at least
equal to the price to be paid by the City, and the price to be paid by the
Redeveloper to reacquire the Redevelcpment Property Is fair and reasonable after
taking into account the commitments of the Redeveloper and the encumbrances on
the Redevelopment Property made, or to be made, in favor of the City under this
Agreement.
(o) The Contract for Dead is in full force and effect and no detault is
existing thereunder.
(p) The Redeveloper shall not permit to be made, without the prior
written consent of the
he
Deed, which consent by the City, City will nottbe ut
unreasonably withheld delayed. for
Section 2.3. Redeveloper's Liability Joint and Several. Unkss otherwise
provided herein, Everest Development, Ltd., and Commercial Property Investments
liable for the performance of any
shall be deemed to be jointly and severally
obligation of the Redeveloper hereunder.
9
ARTICLE III
Acquisition and Conveyance of Property; Pdbllo Improvements
Section 3.1 Current Status of Redevelopment Property. (a) Commercial
Property Iuvestments, inc., (n the owner of the vendeea interest under the
Contract for Deed and Is entitled to purchase that portion of the Redevelopment
Property which is the subject of the Contract for Deed according to the terms of
the Contract for Deed. The parties Intend that the City will accept assignments of
Redeveiupers righis under the Contract for Deed and will purchase Parcels of the
Redevelopment Property from the vendors under the Contract for Deed for a total
amount equal to $2,535,840.00 and convey title and possession of each Parcel of
the Redevelopment Property to the Redeveloper for One Dollar ($1.00), ell
pursuant to Via terms and provisions of this Article Ill.
(b) As of the date of this Agreement, the City has acquired and conveyed
to the Redeveloper by a Redevelopment Prooerty Deed that portion of the
Redevelopment Property described on the attached Schedule A as the Johnson
Parcel. ;n conn2etion with such conveyance. the Redeveloper has paid to the City
the amount of $96,628.00. Such amount shall be deemed to have been provided to
the City as funds required to be provided under Section 3.7 of this Agreement. in
the event that this Agreement is terminated pursuant to Article RI of this
Agreement, the City shall have an option to repurchase the Johnson Parcel from
the Redeveloper for the price of $86,628.00. Such option shall be exercisable by
the City by its giving to the Redeveloper a written notice of its intention to
exercise the option which notice shall be given no later than ninety (90) days
following the date of termination of this Agreement. Within thirty (30) days
following the City's notification of its Intent to exercise the option the
Redeveloper shall deliver to the City a limited warranty deed conveying the
Johnson Parcel to the City and the City shall pay the purchase price of $86,628.00.
The title to the Johnson Parcel to be conveyed to the City shall be subject to no
defects or encumbrances other than those to which it was subject at the time of
the City's conveyance of such property to the Redeveloper.
(c) The City's riligatfors to purchase any Parcel, other than the Johnson
Parrel which has already been purchased by the City, of the Redevelopment
Property shall be subject to satisfaction of the following conditions precedent:
(1) There has not occurred an Event of Default under this
Agreement which remains uncured after the notice period prescribed by
Section 9.2, and the City receives satisfactory assurances that any other
existing Events of Default will be promptly cured;
(11) The Redeveloper having made available to the City funds, as
required pursuant to Section 3.7, In amounts sufficient to acquire the
subject Parcel or Parcels after crediting the Redeveloper for amounts paid
under the Contract for Deed toward the purchase of the Redevelopment
Property; and
(ill) Receipt of an opinion of counsel to the Redeveloper in the
form attached hereto as Schedule K. `-
10
(d) The City's purchase of the Redevelopment Property shall also be
conditioned upon the Redeveloper having obtained all necessary zoning, subdivlrlon
and environmental permits and approvals for construction of the Minimum
improvements from the City, State and other regional and federal agencies.
Section 3.2. Acquisition of Redevelopment Property. Subject to the
provisions of this Article iii, on or before a date thirty (30) days after the
Redeveloper gives the nctice described at Section 4.6 with respect to a Phase, or
or: such other date as the Redeveloper and City may agree, the City will purchase
the Parcel of the Redevelopment Property upon which the Phase Is to be
constructed from the vendors under the Contract for Deed. The purchase price for
each Parcel to be paid by the City shall be the amount calculated in the manner set
forth in Section 21(c) of the Contract for Deed, but the total purchase price to be
paid by the City for the entire Redevelopment Property, except for the Johnson
Parcel, shall not exceed $2,535,840. The City shall purchase the Redevelopment
Property as provided herein in consideration of the covenants of the Redeveloper
to cause the Redevelopment Property to be developed in accordauee with the
provisluns of this Agreement and as at,. inducement to the Redeveloper to cause the
Minimum Improvements to be constructed thereon after the purchase date as
provided herein. The Purchase Price shall be payable by the City at the time and
In the manner described in Section 3.7. The City shall not qualify ary Parcel of the
Redevelopment Property as exempt from ad valorem taxes during the perlvl it
holds such property. The Redeveloper shall, and hereby agrees to, pay all ad
valorem taxes and installments of special assessments, if any, on the
Redevelopment Property or any portion thereof which are due and payable during
�^ the period the City owns such Redevelopment Property or portion thereof.
Section 3.3. Conveyance of the Redevelopment Property. The City shall
convey title to and possession of each Parcel of the Redevelopment Property to the
Redeveloper under a deed (which deed shall be substantially in the form of the
Redevelopment Property Deed contained in Schedule B of this Agreement). The
conveyance of title to the Redevelooment Property pursuant to the Redevelopment
Property Deeds and the Redeveloper's use of the Redevelopment Property shall be
subject to all of the conditions, covenants, restrictions and limitations imposed by
the Plan, the Developer's Agreement, this Agreement, and the Redevelopment
Property Deed, and shall also to subject to Permitted Encumbrances, and building
and zoning laws and crdlnances and all other applicable locai, state and federal
laws and regulations.
Section 3.4. Time of Conveyance. ;<) It no Event of Default has occurred
(or if an Event of Defaull has occurred but has been cured), the City shall execute
and deliver to Redeveloper the Redevelopment Property Deed for each Parcel on
the date that the City acquires title to and possession of the Parcel or on such
other date as the City and the Redeveloper shall mutually agree in writing. The
Redeveloper shall take possession of each Parcel of the Redevelopment Property
the day of execution and delivery of the Redevelopment Property Deed for such
Parcel by the City.
(b) Unless otherwise mutually agreed by. the City and the Redeveloper, the
execution and delivery of all deeds and the payment of any Purchase Price shall be
made at the principal offices of the City. The price to be paid by the Redeveloper
for the conveyance of each Parcel of the Redevelopment Property by the City shall
be One Dollar ($1.00).
11
r:
(cl, Each Redevelopment Property Deed ahall be in recordable form and
shall be promptly recorded. The Redeveloper shall pay all costs for such recording.
Section 3.5. Title. (a) Within ten (10) days after the Redeveloper has
received an initial commitment for the issuance of an owner's title insurance policy
with respect to the Redevelopment Property and in any event no later than
December 31. 1967. the Redeveloper shall deliver a copy of the commitment to the
City. The commitment shall be obtained from a title Insurance company licensed
to do business in the State and shall initially Insure the title to the Redevelopment
Property in the amount of $1,500,000.00. The Redeveloper shall thereafter cause
to be increased the amount of the title Insurance commitment so that at all times
the amount of coverage available equals the aggregate price paid by the City, using
funds provided under Section 3.7, for the Redevelopment Property. The
commitment shall commit the Insurer to the issuance of an owner's title insurance
policy (ALTA FORM "B"), shall name the City and Redeveloper as the proposed
Insured parties, shall be certified to date, include searches for bankruptcies and
state and federal judgments, tax and other liens and for all special sasessments
levied or pending. The commitment shall Include full mechanic's lien coverage and
coverage for matters revealed by a survey (including gaps). The City shall be
allowed twenty (20) days after receipt thereof for examination of said commitment
and the making of ally objections thereto, said objections to be made in writing and
delivered to the Redeveloper within said time or deemed to be waived. No
objection may be based on the existence of a Permitted Encumbrance.
(b) If any objection to the title held by the Redeveloper or the present
owner of the Redevelopment Property is made by the City, said objection shall be
accompanied by a written election of one of the following-
(1) a determination to delay the City's acquisition of the
Redevelopment Property for a reasonable time during which the
Redeveloper shall undertake to cure or cause to be cured the basis for such
objection; or
(11) a determination to acquire title to and possession of the
Redevelopment Property upon the assumption by the Redeveloper of the
obligation to undertake ally such actions as may be necessary to cure the
basis for the objection. If the CIty makes the election described in Section
3.5(b)(H) of this Agreement, and the objection cannot be cured the City shall
have no recourse against the Redeveloper as a result thereof.
(c) The City shall voluntariiy take no actions to encumber title to any
Parcel of the Redevelopment Property between the date the City acquire, the
Parcel to the date on which the Redevelopment Property Deed for such Parcel is
executed and delivered by the City.
Section 3.6. Public Improvements. (a) The City hereby appoints the
Redeveloper to act as its agent in connection with the construction of the Public
improvements. The Public Improvements shall consist of the Improvements
described in the attached Schedule 1, the constructioi: of which shall be completed
within the time periods set forth In the attached Schedule J.
(b) Plans and specifications subcontracts, and ell contracts reltin to a
the design and construction of the Pub le improvements shall be prepared by the
12
Redeveloper and submitted to the City for the City's review and approval- Any
�Soregoing documents shall be submitted to the City for its review
changes 1n the
and approval
(c) Following the City's review and approval of the plans and
or the Public
nd subcontracts f
Redevelopermallshprooeedcontracts ato let bids for contracts for the onstructiontof the
Public Improvements in accordance with the statutory bidding and contractlug
procedures applicable to the letting of contracts by municipalities. The City shall
provide the Redeveloper with guidance as to such requirements. All bids submitted
for the construction of the Public Improvements shall be subject to reshall view and
appru..&I by the City. Subject to this section ant{Section 7.1(e), twith i whom the
contractors, subcontractors and/or eons,ru_. �n ma
the CIt upon tl�e
Redeveloper Teas enfoo
nternf invoices from contrasuch contractors any certifi atf°cu9 signed
by th Red v the Ciy'o ect architect to the effect that the cats for which
by the Redeveloper's p. j
payment is being sought have been incurred in connection with the construction
documents approved by the City.
(d) Upon completion of the construction of the Public Improvements In
tion, the City's obligations and liabilities with respect to
accordance with this Sec
the thereafter uhavennofthe liabilItyutoi the mRedeveloper orprovements al third parties resuLtting from
l
any defect in the construction of those port!ons of the Dublin improvements
located on the Redevelopment Property. The Redeveloper agrees l indemnity,
defand all andhold
orecatusesmesst of ahe ction ntsoff tw"tsoever°nature and
arisingagents,
Outfrom
of, or
of any alleged defect In the construction of the Public
purportedly arising out
Improvements.
Section 3.7. F''larcin{t Clty ActIvIties.
(a) It Is understood and agreed by the parties that in lieu of other forms
of security which may reasonably be requested by the City to secure the
Redeveloper's performance under this Agreement, the Redeveloper is willing to
Initially finance the C;ity's costs of acquisition of each Parcel of the
or other
Redevelopment byProper
tha Redevel perthrouh the use of the to financeeconsttruction of thefunds
Minimum
funds obtained by
Improvements. Without y Parcel of other
the Redevelopmem Propertynis the
expressly
obligation to onacquirethe
any
conditioned upon the Redeveloper having provided funds to the C1ty in an amount
ed
ce City to be Incurred by the
ity inecon connection withlthe acquisition Ofof thc� costs ithetParcel hSuch f nds shalt then be used
by the City to finance its acquisition of the Parcel. The City agrees that it will, at
the times specified in this Section 3.7, reimburse the Redeveloper for to the total
amounts
paid by the Redeveloper under this Section 3.7 of this Agreement, up
amount of $2,622,468.00, which amount includes the amount provided to the City
for its acquisition of the Johnson Parcel and amounts previously paid by the
Redeveloper pursuant to the Contract for Deed; provided, that such amounts shall
be Increased by anYJt which C[tyefor the construction ofReeveloper expends t which
Publlc Impro uire land ement
is necessary, as approved by theesign
to ogram Avenue and Highway 10 as shown on the submitt d In connection with the Planed Unit DevelopmentApproval. SThe City's
13
�I
obligation to make such reimbursement shall be evidenced by a promissory notes in
a form acceptable to the City and the Redeveloper.
(b) if the Redeveloper is in compliance with this Agreement and all
conditions to the City's performance have been satisfied, the City agrees to
reimburse, solely to the extent that there exist sufficient proceeds from the Bonds
for such purpose, the Redeveloper for amounts provided or deemed to have been
provided by the Redeveloper to the City pursuant to this Section 3.7. The City
shall make a reimbursement to the Itedeveloper
ter
Issuance of a Certificate of Completion fora Phase, or earlier ( following such
issuance as Bond proceeds are available considering the liquidity of the City's
Investments using the Bond proceeds. The amount to be reimbursed by the City to
Redeveloper following issuance cf a Certificate of Completion on any Parcel, as
aforesaid, shell be determined as follows'
(1) Tne "percentage shere" of Bondproceedsavailable for
reimbursement of the Redeveloper ar el shall be established by
digthe eAm untminimum
the Ass ssoes�Marketme for the
provLA Parcel by
Valuefor all parcels
thee Aggregate comprising the project (as set forth in Section 6.4);
((i) The total amount of Bond proceeds available for
reimbursement of the Redeveloper shall be established and shall equal the
&net bond proceeds available for diatributlon to Redeveloper after payment
of expenses authorized by Section 3 0 b)(0 (fD and III of this Agreement,
L plus Interest earrings thereon; an
(ill) The "percentage share" for a parcel shall to multiplied times
the total ds
Redeveloper and nthe f resultant bond p sum e shall vrepresent lable o the disbursement
amount be
Areimbursed to the Redeveloper.
in the event that this Agreement Is terminated prior to the City's
reimbursement of the Redeveloper for the entire amount paid by the Redeveloper
under this Section 3.7, the City shall have no obligation to further reimburse the
Redeveloper for any amounts paid by the Redeveloper pursuant to this Section 3.7;
except that In the even: that the Redeveloper falls, whether as a result of
Unavoidable Delays or for other reasons, to complete construction of the Minimum
improvements so as to produce the Assessor's Minimum Market Values at the times
set forth In Section 4.3, but does complete such construction prior to termination
of this Agreement, the amount of the funds to be reimbursed by the City to the
Redeveloper under this Section 3.7 shall be reduced by the amount that the Tax
Increment which will be generated by the partially completed hfinimum
Improvements, is less than the amount of Tax Increment which would have been
generated and remitted to the Authority in that year and future years if the
Minimum improvements had been completed on or before the specified date in
Section 4.3. The City shall have no obligation to pay any Interest on any amounts
provided to the City by the Redeveloper pursuant to this Section 3.7.
(c) it is understood by the City and the Re�eveloper that the City's
Fco
ligatIonto reimburse the Redeveloper for $170,000 of the amount which the 7obligated to reimburse the Redeveloper pursuant to this Section 3.7 ty
isnditional upon the Redeveloper having secured as a tenant of a portion of the
14
Redevelopment Property, Tranallealth, a Therefore, in the
event that the Redeveloper has felled by June 1, 1988, to secure a binding
commitmeat, !n a form reasonably approved by the City, f= TrenslfealthAo
eco e a tenant of the Minimum improvements, the net amount of the Bonds
wh ch are available for paying the costs set forth at Section 3.9(b) of this
Agreement shall be deemed to be $170,000 less than the actual amount of Bonds
available. In the event that such amount is so reduced, the City agrees to use the
$170,000 to fund the reserve fund described at Section 6.2 of this Agreement.
Section 3.8. Dedication cf City Financial Assistance. In consideration of
the Financial Assistance to be provided by the City to this Agreement, the
Redeveloper agrees that It will dedicate a portion of the amounts to be reimbursed
to the Redeveloper pursuant to Section 3.7 of this Agreement to the constructlon
of certain exterior refinements to the Minimum Improvements and interior office
amenities which are in addition to those types of refinements and amenities
normally found In buildings similar to the Minimum Improvements. The exact
nature of such refinements and, amenities are as shown in the approved Panned
Unit Development documents for the Redeveloper's project.
Section 3.9. Iscuanc_e of Bonds: Use of Bond Proceeds. (a) The City agrees
that It will, subject to limitations of law, use its best efforts to issue and sell the
Bonds byami 31, 1988. The principal amount of the Bonds shall be the amount
which, In the reasonable discretion of the City and its fiscal consultant, may be
amortized solely through the use of Tax increment generated from the
Redevelopment Property and completed Minimum Improvements, considering the
Redeveloper's schedule for construction of the Minimum Improvements and existing
and projected mill rates. It is anticipated that the amount of the Bonds which may
be issued and repaid solely out of Tax htcrement generated from the Redevelopera
development hereunder is equal to $6,000,000.00. In no avant shall the City be
obligated to issue bonds in a principal amount greater than $8,000,000,00.
(b) The proceeds of the Bonds shall be urted to pay the City's costa
hereunder, Including reimbursements to Redeveloper. Because the principal
amount of the Bonds and the exact cost of some of the City's activities hereunder
Is presently unknown, the proceeds of the Bonds shall be used to pay the following
costs In the following order:
(1) First, to pay all reasonable avid necessary costs Incurred by the
City in connection with the issuance of the Bonds Including, bond discount,
reserve fund, if any, and fees of legal counsel and other consultants retained
in connection with the Issuance of the Bonds;
-(il) Second, to pay all City administrative and other reasonable
and necessary costs incurred or anticipated to be incurred in connection
with the City's administration of this Agreement, the Development District,
and the Tax increment District;
(111) Third, to pay the costs of constructing the Public
improvements;
(1v) Fourth, to reimburse the Redeveloper for the amounts
pursuant to Section 3.7 of this Agreement;
15
(v) Fifth, to retwourse the Redeveloper for Its documented and
reasonable costs In connection with Its acquisition of the Contract for Deed
but not including any costs paid toward the purchase of the Redevelopment
Property under said Contract for Deeded
M
16
ARTICLE Iv
Construction of Minimum improvements
Section 4.1. Construction of Minimum improvements. The Redeveloper
agrees that It will construct the Minimum Improvements on the Redevelopment
Property in accordance with this Agreement, the Developer's Agreement and the
approved Construction Plans and at all times prior to the Maturity Late will
operate and maintain, preserve and keep the Minimum Improvements or cause the
Minimum Improvements to be maintained, preserved and kept with the
appurtenances and every part and parcel thereof, in good repsir and condition.
Section 4.2 Construction Plans. (a) Prior to the commencement of
construction of any Phase or Parcel, the Redeveloper shall submit to the City
"Preliminary Plans," consisting of typical floor plans and sketches of the typical
exterior and interior of the proposed Minimum improvements which Illustrate the
size and character of the proposed improvements. The Preliminary Plans shall not
be Inconsistent with the Site Plans, the Program, the Developer's Agreement, this
Agreement and all applicable state and local laws and regulations, Insofar as said
consistency may no determined at said preliminary stage. If approval of the
Preliminary Plans Is requested in writing by the Redeveloper at the time of their
submission to the City, said Preliminary Plans :hall be approved or rejected (in
whole or 1n part) in writing by the City within thirty (30) days after the date of
their receipt by the City. If no written rejection is made within said thirty (30)
days, the Preliminary Plans shall be deemed approved by the City. Any rejection
shall set forth In detail the reasons therefor. If the City rejects the Preliminary
Plans, 'in whole or in part, the Redeveloper may submit new or corrected
Preliminary Plans at any time after receipt by the Redeveloper of the notice of
rejection. The City's approval of the Preliminary Plans shall not be unreasonably
withheld.
(b) Prior to the Redeveloper's commencement of construction of any
Phase of the Minimum Improvements and, In any event, no later than June 1 of the
year prior to the year in which the Phase must be completed In order to meet the
schedule of Assessor's Minimum Market Values set forth in Section 4.3, the
Redeveloper shall Submit to the City Construction Plans for the Phase. The
Construction Plans shall provide for the constrdetlon of the subject Phase of the
Minimum Improvements and shall be in conformity with the Program, this
Agreement, the Developer's Agreement, the Preliminary Plans, and all applicable
state and local laws and regulations. The City shall approve the Construction Plans
In writing Ifi, (a) the Construction Plans conform to the terms and conditions of the
Preliminary Plans, the Developer's Agreement and this Agreement; (b) the
Coastructlon Plans conform to the goals and objectives of the Program; (c) the
Construction Plans conform to all applicable federal, State and local laws,
ordinances, rules and regulations; (d) the Construction Plans are adequate to
provide for the construction of the subject Phase of the Minimum Improvements;
(a) the Construction Plans do not provide for expenditures in excess of the funds
available to the Redeveloper for the construction of the subject Phase of the
Minimum improvements; if) the design of the Nlinimum Improvements and the
facade and landscaping plans provide for a facility which is consistent with the
Design Stage Plans submitted and approved in connection with the Planned Unit
Development Approval; and (g) no Event of Default has occurred. No approval by
17
the City shall relieve the Redeveloper of the obligation to comply with the terms
of this Agreement, the terms of the Program, the Development Agreement,
applicable federal, state and local laws, ordinances, rules and regulations, or to
construct the Minimum Improvements In accordance therewith. No approval by the
City shall constitute a waiver of an Event of Default. if approval of the
Construction Plans is requested by the Redeveloper in writing at the tine of
submission, such Construction Plans shall be deemed approved unless rejected in
writing by the City, in whole or In part. Such rejection shall set forth in detail the
reasons therefor, and shall be made within forty five (45) days after the date of
their receipt by the City unless the Construction Plans must be submitted to the
City's Planning Commission as a result of changes from the Design Stage Plans
approved in connection with the City's Planned Unit Development approval. If the
City rejects any Construction Plans in whole or in part, the Redeveloper shall
submit new or corrected Construction Plans within thirty (30) days after written
notification to the Redeveloper of the rejection. The provisions of this Section
relating to approval, rejection and resubmission of corrected Construction Plans
shall continue to apply until tie Constnict!on Plans have been approved by the
City: Provided, that in any event the Redeveloper shall submit Cvnstruetlon Plana
for a Phase which are approved no later than the date of acquisition by the City of
the Parcel of the Redevelopment Property upon which the Phase is to be
constructed. The City's approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. Said approval
shall constitute a conclusive determination that the Construction Plans (and the
Phase, constructed in accordance with said plans) comply to the City's satisfaction
with the provisions of this Agreement relating thereto. The Construction Plans
shall not be rejected due to any objection which could have been raised upon review
of the Preliminary Plans and corrected more economically at that time. k-
(c) if the Redeveloper desires to make any change in the Preliminary
Plans or Construction Plans after their approval by the city, the Redeveloper snall
submit the proposed change to the City for its approval. If the Preliminary Plans
or Construction Plans, as mo:ifled by the proposed change, conform to the
requirements of this Section 4.2 of this Agreement with respect to such previously
approved Construction Plans, the City shall approve the proposed change and notify
the Redeveloper In writing of its approval. Such change in the Preliminary Plans or
Construction Plans shall, in any event, be deemed approved by the City unless
rejected, in whole or In part, by written notice by the City to the Redeveloper,
sotting forth in detail the reasons therefor. Such rejection shall be made within
ten (10) days after receipt of the notice of such change.
Section 4.3. Commencement and Completion of Construction. (a) Subject
to Unavoidable Delays, the Redeveloper shall cause construction of the first Phase
of Minimum improvements to be commenced (1) by April 1, 1988, or (11) on such
other date as the parties shall mutually agree in writing. Subject to Unavoidable
Delays, the Redeveloper shall have substantially completed the construction of the
final Phase of the Minimum improvements by January 1,j19911 In addition, subject
to Unavoidable Delays es they pertaln to any particular Phase, the Redeveloper
shall have substantially completed construction of such Minimum Improvements by
January 2 of the following years so that the Minimum Improvements will have the
following aggregate cumulative As..essor's Minimum Market Values in such years:
18
Aggregate Cumulative
Assessor's Minimum
Date Market Values
1989 :6,021,081.00
1990 14,623,745.00
1991 19,500,067,00
Time lost as a result of Unavoidable Delays for any Phase shall be added to
extend any completion date above beyond such date, a number of days equal to the
number of days lost as a result of Unavoidable Delays. All work with respect to
the Minimum Improvements to be constructed or provided by the Redeveloper on
the Redevelopment Property shall be in conformity with the Construction plans as
submitted by the Redeveloper and approved by the City.
(b) The Redeveloper agrees for itself, its successors and assigns, and
every successor in interest to the Redevelopment Property, or any part thereof,
and each Redevelopment Property Deed shall contain covenants on the par! of the
Redeve!oper for itself and such successors and assigns, that the Redeveloper, and
such successors and assigns, shall promptly begin and diligently prosecute to
completion the redevelopment of th-: Redevelopment Property through the
construction of the Minimum improvements thereon, and that such construction
shall in any event be commenced and enmpleted within the period specified In this
Section 4.3 of this Agreement. It is intended and agreed, and the Redevelopment
Property Deeds shall so expressly provide, that such agreements and covenants
shall be covenants running with the land and that they shall, in any events and
without regard to technical classification or designation, legal or otherwise, and
except only as otherwise specifically provided in the Agreement Itself, be, to the
fullest extent permitted by law and equity, binding for the benefit of the City and
enforceable by the City against the Redeveloper and its successors and assigns.
Subsequent to conveyance of the Redevelopment Property, or any part thereof, to
the Redeveloper, and until construction of the Minimum improvements has been
completed, the Redeveloper shall make reports, In such detail and at ssch times as
may reasonably be requested by the City, as to the actual progress of the
Redeveloper with respect to such construction.
Section 4.4. Certificate of Completion. (a) Promptly after completion of
each Phase of the Minimum Improvements on each Parcel in accordance with those
provisions of the Agreement relating solely to the obll7ations of the Redeveloper
to construct such improvements (Including the dates for beginning and completion
thereof), the City will furnish the Redeveloper with an appropriate Instrument so
certifying. Such certification by the City sha:l be (and it shall be so provided in
the Redevelopment Property Deed and in the certification itself) a conclusive
determination of satisfaction and termination of the agreements and covenants in
the Agreement and in the Redevelopment Property Deed with respect to the
d its
Minimum sof the improvementsv onpsuch nParcel successors
the datessforr thenconstruct the
beginning and
completion thereof. Such certification and such determination shall not constitute
evidence of compliance
any Holder of a Mortgage, tor any tInsurer oof a Mortgage, obligation tgage,securing money loaned to
finance the Minimum Improvements, or any part thereof.
19
(b) The certificate provided for in this Section 4.4 of this Agreement
shall be in such form as will enable It to be recorded in the proper office for the
recordation of deeds and other instruments pertaining to the Redevelopment
Property. If the City shall refuse or fall to provide any certification in accordance
with the provisions of this Section 4.4 of this Agreement, the City shall, within
thirty (30) days after written request by the Redeveloper, provide the Redeveloper
with a written statement, indicating in adequate detail in what respects the
Redeveloper has failed to complete the Minimum improvements In accordance with
the provisions of the Agreement, or is otherwise in default, and what measures or
acts It will be necessary, In the opinion of the City, for the Redeveloper to take or
perform in order to obtain such certification.
(c) The construction of the Minimum improvements on a Parcel shell be
deemed to be completed when such improvements are substantially completed, as
determined by the City In the exercise of Ito reasonable discretion.
Section 4.5. Development Letter of Credit. (a) Prior to the issuance by the
City of the Bonds the Redeveloper shell provide to the City can irrevocable bank
letter of credit, substantially in the form of Schedule F attached hereto and
satisfactory to the City, in an amount equal to the City's costs and expenses
incurred in connection with the Issuance of the Bonds. This letter of credit and
any other letter of credit provided pursuant to this Section 4.5 of this Agreement
shall be referred to as the "Development Letter of Credit"
b- .sil.bl f
Any Deveiopmeni Leifer of Credit shall,
payments to the City pursuant to any demand for payment by the City until the
earlier of: (1) completion of construction of the Minimum improvements and
delivery of the final Certificate of Completion pursuant to Seelion 4.4 of this
Agreement; or (if) delivery to the City of the Guarantee Letter of Credit pursuant
to Section 6.1(b). Any Development Letter of Credit may have an expiration date
at least one year from the date when the City receives the Developnent Letter of
Credit; provided, however, that in the event the Redeveloper has not completed
the construction of the Minimum Improvements and received the Certificate of
Completion thirty-five (35) days prior to the expiration date of the Development
Letter of Credit, then the Redeveloper shall provide a substitute Development
Letter of Credit to the City, in the same form and in the same amount, with an
expiration date of at least one year from the expiration date of the orior
Development Letter of Credit. Upon tender by the Redeveloper of the substitute
Development Letter of Credit, the City will exchange the prior Development
Letter of Credit for such substitute.
(b) The Development Letter of Credit shall provide that (1) in the event
the Redeveloper. (A) falls to submit a substitute Development Letter of Credit to
the City In a timely and satisfactory manner as required by Section 4.6(a) of this
Agreement or fails to deliver the Guarantee Letter of Credit as required pursuant
to Section 6.1 of this Agreement; (B) fails to submit Construction Plans tc the City
pursuant to Section 4.2 of this Agreement which are approved by the City; (C) falls
to submit satisfactory evidence of financing sufficient to construct the Minimum
Improvements pursuant to Article VII of this Agreement; (D) subject to
Unavoidable Delays fails to commence construction of the Minimum improvements
In a timely manner or in conformity with the Construction Plans pursuant to
Article IV of this Agreement; or (E) subject to Unavoidable Delays fails to
complete construction of the Minimum Improvements In a timely manner or In
20
conformity with the Construction Plans; or (F) falls to provide the funds described
In Beetlon ±.? of this Agreement; and (11) within thirty (30) days after written
notice of failure from the City, the Redeveloper does not cure such failure or, if
thz failure is by Its nature incurable within such thirty (30) days, does not furnish
the City with satisfactory evidence that it can and will cure such failure within a
reasonabto the
City thelentire amoune time, thent of the on rDevelopment Letter ofitten demand to the Credit eCreditto reimburse tbank will he City
for its costs Incurred in connection with the issuance of the Bonds, the creation of
the District and the preparation of this Agreement and any damages incurred as a
result of such defaults; provided, however, that in the event that such payment
exceeds the amount of such costs for which the City has not been otherwise
reimbursed by Developer or through interest earnings on the undisbursed Bond
proceeds the City shall refund any such excess to the Redeveloper.
Section A.G. Phases. The Redeveloper and City recognize that the Minimum
Improvements are intended tc be constructed in stages over tine, and the: the
Redeveloper cannot predict the precise timing or order of the development of `
specific. Pereela. A Phase shell consist of a specific part of the Minimum
improvements on a specific Parcel or Parcels (whether contiguous or scattered) to
be undertaken at a specific time, as designated by the Redeveloper in a notice to
the City specifying the portion of the Minimum Improvements to be undertaken,
ich
the
Parcel
the City to acquirehsuchtParcel or Parcels under he Contract &or
he Phase is to be contructedp and the price to
bepaid byDeed,
4
21
ARTICLE V
Insurance and Condemnation
Section 5.1. Insurance. (a) The Redeveloper will provide and maintain at all
times during the process of constructing the Minimum improvements and, from
time to time at the request of the City, furnish the City with proof of payment of
premiums on:
(1) Builder's rick insurance, written on the so- Wed "Builder's
Risk -- Completed Value Brsis," In an amount equal to one hundred percent
(100%) of the insurable value of the Minimum improvements at the date of
completion, end with coverage available In nonreportirg form on the sr
called "all risk" form of policy. The interest of the City shall be protected
In accordance with a clause in form and content reasonably satisfactory to
the City.
(11) Comprehensive general liability insurance (including
operations, contingent liability, operations of subcontractors, completed
operations and contractual liability insurance) together with an Owner's
Contractor's Policy with limits against bodily injury and p:oparty damage of
not less than $2,000,000 for each occurrence (to accomplish the above -
required limits, an umbrella excess liability policy may be used).
(111) Workers' compensation insurance, with statutory coverage.
The policies of Insurance required pirsuant to clauses (1) and (i) above shall be in
form and content satisfactory to the City and shall be placed with financially sound
and rep:tab,e insurers licensed to transact business In the State. The policy of
insurance delivered pursuant to clause (1) above shall contain an agreement of the
Insurer to give not less than thirty (30) days' advance written notice to the City in
the event of cancellation of such policy or change affecting the overage
thereunder.
(b) Upon completion of construction of the Minimum Improvements on
each Parcel and prior to the Maturity Date, the Redeveloper shall maintain, or
cause to be maintained, at its cost and expense, and from time to time at the
request of the City shall furnish proof of the payment of premiums on, insurance as
follows:
(1) insurance against loss and/or danage to such improvements
under's policy or policies covering such risks as are ordinarily insured
against by similar businesses, including (without limiting the generality of
the foregoing) fire, extended coverage, vandalism and malicious mischief,
boiler explosion, water damage, demolition cost, debris removal, collapse
and flood In an amount not less titan the full insurable replacement value of
such Improvements, but any such policy may have a deductible amount of
not more than $25,000.00. No policy of insurance shall be so written that
the proceeds thereof will produce less than the minimum coverage required
by the preceding sentence, by reason of co -Insurance provisions or
otherwise, without the prior consent thereto In writing by the City. The
term "full insurable replacement value" shall mean the actual replacement
J
A
ng
cost of the improvements (eipldrainsfoundation
other uninsurable it me) and
costs of underground flues, pipes,
equipment, and may be determined from time to time at the request of the
City, but not more frequently than orce every three years, by an Insurance
lsInsurer,
selected
and paid
and approved
(hi
poiciesevidennginsurancequirdby respectthissubaragrph1)with
to the Minimum improvements shall be carried In the
their&messpect the
e
Redeveloper, the Redeveloper's Mortgagee and the City
interests may appear and shall contain standard clauses which provide for
Nei Proceeds of insurance resulting from claims per casualty thereunder to
the Minimum Improvements which are equal to or less then $250,000.00 for
loss or damage covered thereby to be made payable directly to the
Redeveloper and its Mortgagee, and Net Proceeds from such claims in
excess of f250,00 City.
The to Cie payable
the jRe.-AIY to the developer shall jofntlyer, Its
agrec
Mortgagee and the Clty. Y and
on the amount of settlement.
(11) Comprehensive general public liability insurance, including
personal injury liability (with employee exclusion deleted), and automobile
Insurance, Including owned, non -owned and hired automob..,yes, agalust lia-
bility for injuries to persons and/or property, in the minimum amount for
each occurrence and for each year of $200o,000.00, and shall be endorsed to
show the City as Oditional lnsured.
(it!) Such other insurance, including worker's compensation In ur-
ance respecting all employees of the Redeveloper engaged In work with
respect to the construction of the Minimum improvements, in such amount
as is carried itlorganizations niattlike activities
comparable sizeand liability exposure; provided that Redeveloper may
be self -Insured with respect to all or any part of Its liability for worker's
compensation.
(c) All Insurance required in Article V of this Agreement shall be taken out
and maintained in responsible insurance companies selected by the Redeveloper
which are authorized under the laws of the State to assume the risks covered
thereby. The Redeveloper will deposit annually with the City policies evidencing
all such insurance, or a certificate or certificates or binders of the respective
Insurers stating that such insurance is in force and effect. Unless otherwise
provided in this Article V of this Agreement each policy shall contain a provision
that the insurer shall not cancel nor modify it without giving written notice to the
Redeveloper and the City at least thirty (30) days before the cancellation or
modification becomes effective. Not less than fifte^-n (151, days prior to the
expiration of any policy, the Redeveloper shall furnish the City evidence
satisfactory to been
ther
policy conforming tolthe ty tprovisiohat the nslof this Article V ofthis Aor greemenlaced t orthat
there is no necessity therefor under the terms hereof. iu lieu of separate policies,
the Redeveloper may maintain a single policy, blanket or umbrella policies, or a
thereofcombination having
which
nt
Redeveloper shall d�eposit e with the coverage required herein,
Cityacertificate or pert certificates the
the
respective insurers as to the amount of coverage in force upon the Minimum
improvements.
23
(d) The Redeveloper agrees to notify the City immediately In t,ie case of
damage excee4ing $50,000.00 In amount to, or destruction of, the Minimum
improvements or any portion thereof resulting from fire or other casualty. In the
event that any such damage does not exceed $250,000.00, the Redeveloper will
forthwith repair, reconstruct and restore the Minimum Improvements to substan-
tially the same or an improved condition or value as It existed prior to the event
causing surh damage and, to the extent necessary to accomplish such repair,
reconstruction and restoration, the Redeveloper will apply the Net Proceeds of any
insurance relating to such damage received by the Redeveloper to the payment or
reimbursement of the costs thereof. Net Proceeds of any Insurance relating to
such damage up to $250,000.00 shall be paid directly to the Redeveloper.
In the event the Minimum Improvements or any portion thereof is destroyed
by fire or other casualty and the damage or destruction is estimated to equal or
exceed $250,000.00, then the Redeveloper shall within one hurdred and twenty
(120) days after such damage or destruction, proceed forthwith to repair,
reconstruct and restore the damaged Minimum improvements to substantially the
same condition or utility value as It existed prior to the event causing such damage
or destruction and, to the extent necessary to accomplish such repair,
reconstruction and restoration, the Redeveloper, its Mortgagee and the City will
apply the Net Proceeds of any insurance relating to such damage or destruction
received by its Mortgagee and the City to the payment or reimbursement of the
costs thereof. Any Net Proceeds remaining after completion of construction shall
be disbursed to the Redeveloper.
(e) If the Redeveloper is in compliance with the terms and conditions of; _
the Program, the Developer's Agreement, this Agreement and the Redevelopment
Property Deed, then any Net Proceeds of insurance relating to such damage or
destruction received by the City shall be released from time to time by the City to
the Redeveloper upon the receipt of:
(1) A certificate of an authorized representative of the Rede-
veloper specifying the expenditures made or to be made or the indebtedness
incurred in connection with such repair, reconstruction and restoration and
stating that such Net Proceeds, together with any other moneys legally
available for such purposes, will be sufficient to complete such repair,
construction and restoration; and
(2) If Net Proceeds equal or exceed $$0,000.00 In amount, the
written approval of such certificate by an independent engineer.
The Redeveloper shall complete the repe.ir, reconstruction and restoration of the
Minimum Improvements, whether or not the Net Proceeds of Insurance received by
the Redeveloper for such purposes are sufficient to pay for the same. Any Net
Proceeds remaining after completion of such repairs, construction and restoration
shall be remitted to the Redeveloper.
(f) In lieu of its obligation to reconstruct the Minimum Improvements as
set forth in Section 5.1(d), the Redeveloper shall have the option of paying to the
City an amount of money which, in the opinion of the City and Its fiscal consultant,
Is sufficient to redeem the Bonds at their next earliest redemption date.
24
Section 5.2. Condemnation. in the event that title to and possession of the
Minimum Improvements or any material part thereof shall be taken in
condemnation or by the exercise of the power of eminent domain by any
governmental body or other person (except the City) prior to the Maturity Date,
the Redeveloper shall, with reasonable promptness after such taking, notify the
City as to the nature and extent of such taking. Upon receipt of any
Condemndation Award the Redeveloper shall elect to either: (de) use the entire
condemnation Award to reconstruct the Minimum Itdprovements (or, In the event
only a part of Minimum Improvements have been taken, then to reconstruct such
part) within the District; or (b) pay to the City out of the Condemnation Award the
amount necessary to repay the Bona.
25
ARTiCLE VI
Tax Increment
Section 8.1. Tax Guarantee. (a) Subsequent to the City's issuance of the
Bonds, in the event that the City on a date sixty (60) days prior to the date that the
City is required to make any principal or interest payment with respect to the
Bonds has not received sufficient Tax increment paid with respect to the
Redevelopment Property (when added to the amount of capitalized Interest
available from the issuance of the Bonds) is insufficient tc make the next
succeeding principal and/or interest payment on the Bonds, the City shall provide
notice to the Redeveloper of such fact and the amount of the deficiency in Tax
increment. Twenty (20) days after receipt of such notice of deficiency, the
Redeveloper shall be liablt for and shall pay to the City the amount of such
deficiency. Failure on the part of the City to provide the notice of the deficiency
when required pursuant to this Section 6.1.(a) shall not relieve the Redeveloper of
Its obligation to make such paymenylwenty (20) days after actual notice of the
deficiency Is provided by the City to the Redeveloper.
(b) The obligation of the Redeveloper to make the payments provided for
in this Section 6.1 shall be absolute and unconditional irrespective of any defense
or any rights of setoff, recoupment or counter -claim It might otherwise have
against the City or any other government body or other person, and shall be
secured by the Guarantee Letter of Credit. Prior to delivery to the Redeveloper of r'
any Certificate of Completion pursuant to Section 4.4 of this Agreement, prior to
the City making any payment in connection with the construct!on of the Public
Improvements, or prior to the City's making of any reimbursement of funds under
Section 3.7, whichever occurs earlier, the Redeveloper shall deliver to the City the
Guarantee Letter of Credit lu a form satisfactory to the City for an amount equal
to the annual Tax Increment necessary to be generated by the Redevelopment
Property to pay annual principal and interest payments on that portion of the Bonds
the proceeds of which have been distributed, for which application for distribution
has been made, or for which the City has incurred binding obligations to expend.
The Guarantee Letter of Credit shall be available for payments to the City
pursuant to any demand for payment by the City to cover deficiencies in taxes in
the 4th, 5th and 6th years following the issuance of the Bonds. Any Guarantee
Letter of Credit may have an expirati it at least one yea- from the date when the
City receives the Letter of Credit; provided, however, that if such Guarantee
Letter of Credit expires prior to the 6th year after Issuance of the Bonds, then
thirty-five (35) days prior to the expiration date of the Guarantee Letter of Credit,
the Redeveloper shall provide a substitute Guarantee Letter of Credit to the City,
In the same form and in the same amount, with an expiration date of at least one
year from the expiration date of the prior Letter of Credit. Upon tender by the
Redeveloper of the substitute Letter of Credit, the City will exchange the prior
Guarantee Letter of Credit for such substitute. The City may draw upon the
Guarantee Letter of Credit in the event that the Redeveloper: (1) falls to pay any
deficiency in taxes pursuant to this Section 6.1; or (11) fails to provide a substitute
Guarantee Letter of Credit as required in this Section 6.1.
(e) in the event that the Redeveloper fails to comply with Its obligation
Fhet
pay any deficiency In Tax Increment as set forth In this Section 6.1 when due,
to shell have the option, in additional to any other remedy available to it
26
hereunder or at law Including the right to sue to collect the payment not made
when due, tie right to declare immediately due and payable by the Redeveloper an
amount equal to the amount which, In the reasonable judgment of the City's fiscal
consultant, to necessary to defense the bonds at their . ext earliest redemption
date. The City shall not have the riglt: to so a:c:i s 1:1: r :ue under this
Section 6.1 unlass the following conditions hhve been sstisfls-
(i) The Guarantee Letter of Credit Is r:= ,er available in an
amount sufficient to pay the next principal: and interest payment on the
Bonds; and
(li) The Redeveloper
ment undersSectted to l n 8.1 ofe its failure to make a
thispay
required deficiency payment Agreement by a data
ninety (90) days after the date that the City provided notice of the
deficiency to the Redeveloper.
Section 6.2. Tax increment Certification. The City has established a tax
increment district within the Development District which encompaves the
Redevelopment Property and has requested that the county auditor of the County
certify the Assessed Market Value of the Redevelopment Property pursuant to
Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.76. The City shall pledge and appropriate to the
extent necessary the Tax Increment generated by such real property to the
payment of the principal of, premium, if any, and intereat on the Bonds due in any
year until the Maturity Date. In the event that the City receives in any year Tax
Increment from the Redevelopment Property in excess of the amounts necessary to
make debt service payments on the Bonds in such year, the City agrees that It will
create a reserve fund and pledge the proce-Js thereof to the payment of debt
service on the Bonds. Such reserve fund will be used to vav any def let mey in Tax
.. L mnfl} 11,1I;Pr
Section 6.3. Real Property Texas. (a) The Redeveloper shall pay when due
all real property taxes payable with respect to the Redevelopment Property
subsequent to execution of the Redevelopment Property Deed.
(b) The Redeveloper agrees that prior to the Maturity Date it will not take
any of the following actions to the extent tY._t such actions would result in a
reduction in the taxes generated from the Redevelopment Property below the
amounts specified In Section 6.1: (1) it will not seek administrative review or
judicial review of the applicability of any tax statute determined by any Tax
Official to be applicable to the Project or the Redeveloper or raise the
Inapplicability of any such tax statute as a defense In any proceedings, including
delinquent tax proceedings; (2) It will not seek administrative review or judicial
review of the constitutionality of any tax statute determined by any Tax Official
to be applicable to the Project or the Redeveloper or raise the unconstitutionality
of any such tax statute as a defense in any proceedings, including delinquent tax
proceedings; (3) it will not cause a reduction in the real property taxes paid in
respect of the Redevelopment Property below the amount sufficient to pay the
principal and Interest due on the Bonds through: (A) willful destruction of the
Redevelopment Property or :ny part thereof; (B) willful refusal to reconstruct
damaged or destroyed n. :.. pursuant to Section 5.1 of this Agreement; (C) a
request to i the
the county
tile County to
reduce the tAsse sedhe city sMarketses r oValue of all ror any portion sofof theRedevelopment
27
Property; (D) a petition to the board of equalization of the City or the board of
equalization of the County to reduce the Assessed Market Value of all or any
portion of the Redevelopment Property! (E) a petition to the board of equalization
of the State or the commissioner of revenue of the State to reduce the Assessed
Market Value of all or any portion of the Redevelopment Property; (P) an actior. in
a District Court of the State or the Tax Court of the State pursuant to Minnesota
Statutes, Chapter 278, or any similar State or federal law, seeking a reduction in
the Assessed Market Value of the Redevelopment Propertyl (G) an application to
the commissioner of revenue of the State requesting an abatement of real property
taxes pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 270, or any similar State or f-deral
law; and (H) any other proceedings, whether administrative, legal or equitable, with
any administrative body within the City, the County, or the State or with any court
of the State or the federal government. The Redeveloper shall not, prior to the
Maturity Date, app!y for a deferral of property tax on the Redevelopment Property
pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.se, or any similar law.
Section 6.4. Assessment"Agreement, The Redeveloper shall agree to, and
with the City shall execute, as a condition precedent to the City's delivery of a
Certificate of Completion for improvements constructed on any parcel, an
Assessment Agreement pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section
273.76, Subdivision 8, specifying the Assessor's Mtoimum Market Value for the
Improved parcel for calculation of real property taxes. The aggregate amount of
the Assessor's Minimum Market Value for all Phases shall not be less than
S19.rJ0,067.00. The Redeveloper shall enter into an Assessment Agreement for
such Assessor's Minimum Market Values which provides that by January 2 of the
following years at least the following cumulative aggregate amounts of Assessor's
Minimum Market Values have been established:
Cumulative Aggregate
Amount of Assessor's
Date Minimum Market Values
1989 $ 6,021,081.00
1990 14,623,745.00
1991 19,500,067.00
Each minimum market value set forth in an Asessment Agreement Is herein
referred to as the "Assessor's Minimum Market Value." Nothing in an Assessment
Agreement shall limit the discretion of the assessor to assign a market value to the
property in excess of such Assessor's Minimum Market Value nor prohibit the
Developer from seeking through the exercise of legal or administrative remedies a
reduction In such market value for property tax purposes, provided however, that
the Developer shall not seek a reduction of such market v:.lue below the Assessor's
611nimum Market Value In any year so long as such Assessment Agreement shall
remain In effect. Each Assessment Agreement shall remain in effect until the
Maturity Date.
M
28
r`
ARTICLE VR
Financing
Section 7.1. Financing. (a) Prior to and as a condition to the City's payment
of any of the costs of constructing the Public Improvements, the Redevelo2er shall
submit to the City evidence of a commitment for financing sufficient for
construction of Phases of the idinimum Improvements which will generate the
aggregate_ Assessor's Minimum Market Value required by Section 4.3 to be
generated by January 2, 1989. if the City finds that the financing Is sufficiently
committed, adequate in amount to provide for the contraction of suet+ Phase or
Phases, and contains other terms and conditions which are not inconsistent with the
objectives and needs of the City, then the City shall notify the Redeveloper In
wetting of Its approval. Such approval shall not be unreasonably withheld and
either approval or rejection shall be given within thirty (30) days from the date
when the City Is provided the evidence of such financing. If the City rejects the
evidence of financing as inadequate., It shall do so In writing specifying the basis
for the rejection. in any event the Redeveloper shall submit adequats ev!dcnce of
financing within thirty (30) days after such rejection..
(b) Prior to the City's reimbursement to the Redeveloper of any funds
pursuant to Section 3.7 of this Agreement with respect to a Phase, the Redeveloper
shali provide evidence to the City, satisfactory to the City, that the Redeveloper
has obtained permanent financing with respect to such Phase or that the
Redeveloper has paid all of the costs of constructing such Phase.
Section 7.2. Limitation Upon Encumbrance of Property. Prior to the
completion of the Minimum Improvements, as certified by the City, neither the
Redeveloper nor any successor in interest to the Redevelopment Property or any
part thereof shall engage in any financing or any other transaction creating any
mortgage or other encumbrance or lien upon the Redevelopment Property, whether
by express agreement or operation of law, or suffer any encumbrance or lien to be
made on or attach to the Redevelopment Property, except: (a) for the purposes of
obtaining funds only to the extent necessary for making the Minimum Improve-
ments (including, but not limited to, land and building acquisition, including the
purchase price paid for the Redevelopment Property, labor and materials, pro-
fessional fees, real estate taxes, construction interest, organizational and other
Indirect costs of development, costs of constructing the minimum !mprovements,
and an allowance for contingencies), and (b) only upon the prior written Ppproval of
the City, which approval shalt not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. For the
purposes of ,such financing as may be made pursuant to the Agreement, the
Redevelopment Property may, at the option of the Redeveloper (or successor In
interest), be divided into several parts or parcels, provided that such subdivision, in
the opinion of the City, Is not Inconsistent with the purposes of the Program and
this Agreement and Is approved in writing by the City.
Section 7.3. Approval of Mortgage. The City shall approve a Mortgage If:
(a) the City first receives a copy of all mortgage documents; (b) the City
determines, In Its reasonable discretion, that the mortgagee Is a responsible lender
capable of and authorized to make the mortgage loan; (c) the City determines, In
its reasonable discretion, that the mortgage loan, together with other funds
available to the Redeveloper, will be sufficient to construct the subject Phase of
29
. r-
the Minimum Improvements; (d) the City determines, In its revonable discretion,
that no Event of Default his occurred; and (a) the City determines, in Its
reasonable discretion, that the terms of the Mortgage conform to the terms of
Section 7.6 of this Agreement. The approval of the City shall not be unreasonably
withheld.
Section 7.4. Copy of Notice of Default to Mortgagee. Whenever the City
shall deliver any notice or demand to the Redeveioper with respect to any breach
or default by the Redeveloper In its obligatiors or covenants under the Agreement,
the City shall at the same time forward a copy of such notice or demand to each
Holder of any Mortgage authorized by the Agreement at the lest address of such
Holder shown In the records of the City.
Section 7.5. Mortstexee'3 Opticn to Cure Defaults. After any breach or.
default referred to in Section 7.4 here:f, each xach Holder shall (insofar as •*A
rights of the City are concerned) have the right, at Its option, to cure or re—ady
such breach or default (or such breach or default to the extent that it relates to
the part of the Redevelopment Froperty covered by its mortgage) and to add the
cost thereof to the Mortgage debt and the lien of its Mortgages Provided, That if
the breach or default is with respect to construction of the Minimum
Improvements, nothing contained in this Section or any other Section of this
Agreement shall be deemed to permit or authorize such Holder, either before or
after foreclosure or action In lieu thereof, to undertake or continue the construc-
tion or completion of the Minimum Improvements (beyond the extent necessary to
conserve or protect Minimum improvements or construction already made) without �—
first having expressly assumed the obligation to the City, by written agreement
satisfactory to the City, to complete, in the manner provided in the Agreement,
the Minimum Improvements on the Redevelopment Property or the part thereof to
which the lien or title of such Holder relates. Any such Holder who shall properly
complete the Minimum Improvements relating to the Redevelopment Property or
applicable part thereof shall be entitled, upon written request made to the City, to
a certification by the City to such effect in the manner provided in Section 4.4 of
this Agreement, and any such certification shall, If so requested by suen Holder.
mean and provide that any remedies or rights with respect to recapture of or
reversion or revesting of title to the Redevelopment Property that the City shall
have or be entitled to because of failure of the Redeveloper or any successor In
interest to the Redevelopment Property, or any part thereof, to cure or remedy
any default with respect to the construction of the Minimum Improvements on
other parts or parcels of the Redevelopment Property, or because of any other
default hi or breach of the Agreement by the Redeveloper or such successor, shall
not apply to the part or parcel of the Redevelopment Property to which such
certification relates.
Section 7.6. Clty's Option to Core Default en MortQasze. in the evant that
the Redeveloper is in default under any Mortgage authorized pursuant to this
Article VII of this Agreement, the mortgagee, within ten (10) days after it or any
of its agents or employees become aware of any such default and prior to
exercising any remedy available to It due to such default, shall notify the City in
writing of: (a) the fact of the default; (b) the elements of the default; and (c) the
actions required to cure the default. If, within thirty (30) days after receipt of said
notice, the City cures any monetary defaults under the Mortgage and commences
the actions necessary to cure any other default (and cures the other default within
s!:. (6) months after receipt of said node:), then the mortgagee shall pursue none of
30
Its remedies under the Mortgage based upon the said default of the Redeveloper.
in the event of a transfer of the title to the Redevelopment Property to the City,
or a third Party approved by the City, whether or not required to cure a default
under the Mortgage, said transfer shall not constitute an event of default under the
Mortgage unless the security of the mortgagee has, In fact, been impaired by said
id
air the
of the
mortgsgee)n he mortgagee the event of atransfer shallpermit the transferee topassume all outstanding
obligations (and receive all remaining disbursements) under the Mortgage and the
loan secured by the Mortgage.
Section 7.7. Subordination end Modification for the Benefit of MotaaKees.
(a) In order to facilitate the obtaining of financing for the construction of the
M!nlmum Improvements by the Redeveloper, the City agrees to subordinate Its
rights under the Redevelopment Property Deed and this Agreement to the Holder
of a
the Mort:gagt provides that If the Holder,6f
the Mortgage e shallprovidedt but only t
forecloseon theRedevelopment Property, the improvements
thereon, or any portion thereof, it shall assume the Redeveloper's obligations under
the Assessment Agreement and under Section 6.3 of this Agreement.
(b) In order to facilitate the obtaining of financing for the construction
of the Minimum improvements, the City agrees that it shall agree to any
reasonable modification of this Articl^ VIl with respect to the rights of the City
under any Mortgage secured by the Redevelopment Property or any Improvements
thereon, or portion thereof, to accommodate the interests of the Holder of the
Mortgage, provided, however, that the City determ!nes, in its reasonable judgment,
that any such modification(s) will adequately protect the legitimate interests and
security of the City with respect to the District.
31
r�
ARTICLE VIII
ProhlMtlons Against Assignment and Transfen indemnification
Section 8.1. Representation as to Redevelopment. The Redeveloper repre-
sents and agrees that its purchase of the Redevelopment Property, and ite other
undertakings pursuant to the Agreement, are, and will be used, for the purpuse of
redevelopment of the Redevelopment Property and not for speculation in land
holding. The Redeveloper further recognizes that, in view of (a) the importance of
the redevelopment of the Redevelopment Property to the general welfare of the
Cityl (b) the substantial financing and other public aids that have been made
available by the City for the purpose of making such redevelopment possible; and
(c) the fact that any act or transaction involving or resulting in a significant
change in the identity of the parties in control of the Redeveloper or the degree of
their control is for practical purposes a transfe: or disposition of the property then
owned by the Redeveloper, the qualifications and Identity of the Redeveloper are
of pardoular concern to the City. The Redeveloper further recognizes that It is
because of such qualifications and identity that the City is entering into the
Agreement with the Redeveloper, and, in so doing, Is further willing to accept and
rely on the obligations of the Redeveloper for the faithful performance of all
undertakings and covenants hereby by it to be performed.
Section 8.2. Prohibition Against Transfer of Proverty and Assignment of
Agreement. Also, for the foregoing reasons the Redeveloper represents and agrees
that prior to the Maturity Date:
(a) Except only by way of security for, and only for, the purpose of
obtaining financing necessary to enable the Redeveloper or any successor in
Interest to the Redevelopment Property, or any part thereof, to perform its
obligations with respect to making the Minimum Improvements under this
Agreement, and any other purpose authorized by this Agreement, the Redeveloper
has not made or created and will not make or create or suffer to be made or
created any total or partial sale, assignment, conveyance, or lease, or any trust or
power, or transfer in any other mode or form of or with respect to the Agreement
or the Redevelopment Property or any part thereof or any interest therein, or any
contract or agreement to eo any of the same, without the prior written approval of
the City unless the Redeveloper remains liable and bound by this Redevelopment
Agreement In which event the City's approval is not required. Any such transfer
shall be subject to the provisions of the Redevelopment Agreement.
(b) In the event the Redeveloper, upon transfer or assignment of the
Redevelopment Property - any pW: n thereof, seeks to be released from its
obligations under this F .velop.. Agreement, the City shall be entitled to
require, except as otherwise provided in the Agreement, as conditions to any such
release that:
(1) Any proposed transferee shall have the qualifications and
financial responsibility, in the reasonable judgment of the City, necessary
and adequate to fulfill the obligations undertaken in this Agreement by the
Redeveloper.
Kra
(11) Any proposed transferee, by Instrument in writing satisfactory
to the City and in form recordable among the land records, shall, for itself
and its successors and assigns, and expressly for the benefit of the City,
have expressly assumed all of the obligations of the Redeveloper under this
Agreement and agreed to be subject to all the conditions and restrictions to
which the Redeveloper is subjecti provided, however, that the fact that any
transferee of, or any other successor in interest whatsoever to, the
Redevelopment Property, or any part thereof, shall not, for whatever
reason, have assumed such obligations or so agreed, and shell not (unless and
only to the extent otherwise specifically provided in this Agreement or
agreed to In writing by the City) deprive the City of any rights or remedies
or controls with respect to the Redevelopment' .roperty or any part thereof
or the construction of the Minimum Improvements; it being the Intent of the
parties as expressed In this Agreement that (to the fullest extent permitted
at law and in equity and excepting only In the manner and to the extent
specifically provided otherwise in this Agreement) no transfer of, or change
with respect to, ownership In the Redevelopment Property or any part
thereof, or any Interest therein, however consummcted or occurring, and
whether voluntary or Involuntary, shall operate, legally or practically, to
deprive or limit the City of or with respect to any rights or remedies on
controls provided in or resulting from this Agreement with respect to the
Mlnlmum Improvements that the City would have had, had there been no
such transfer or change. in the absence of specific written agreement by
the City to the contrary, no such transfer or approval by the City thereof
shall be deemed to relieve the Redeveloper, or any other party bound in any
way by this Agreement or otherwise with respect to the construction of the
Minimum Improvements, from any of Its obligations with respect thereto.
(III) Any and all instruments and other legal documents involved in
effecting the transfer of any interest in this Agreement or the
Redevelopment Property governed by this Article Vlll, shall be in a form
reasonably satisfactory to the City.
In the event the foregoing. conditions are satisfied then the Redeveloper shall be
released from its obligation under this Agreement, as to the portion of the
Redevelopment Property that Is transferred, assigned or otherwise conveyed.
Section 8.3 Release and indemnification Covenants. (a) The Redeveloper
releases from and covenants and agrees that the City and the governing body
members, officers, agents, servants and employees thereof shall not be liable for
and agrees to Indemnify and hold harmless the City and the governing body
members, officers, agents, servants and employees thereof against any loss or
damage to property or any injury to or death of any person occurring at or about or
resulting from any defect In the Minimum Improvements.
(b) Except for any negligent or willful misrepresentation or any
negligent, willful or wanton misconduct of the following named parties, the
Redeveloper agrees to protect and defend the City and the governing body
members, officers, agents, servants and employees thereof, now or forever, and
further agrees to hold the aforesaid harmless from any claim, demand, suit, action
or other proceeding whatsoever by any person or entity whatsoever arising or
purportedly arising from this Agreement, or the transactions contemplated hereby
33
or the acquisltion, construction, Installation, ownership, and operation of the r
Minimum Improvements.
(c) The City and the governing body members, officers, agents, servants
and employees thereof shell not be liable for any damage or Injury tothepay other
ns or
property of the company or its officers, agents, servants or employees
person who may be about the Redevelopment Pr:•lerty, Minimum improvements or
Public improvements due to any act of negligence of any person, other than the
negligence and misconduct of City employees.
(d) All covenants, stipulations, promises, agreements and obligations of
the City contained herein shall be deemed to be the covenants,stipulations,
promises, egreementa and obligations of the City and not of any governing o
member, officer, agent, servant or employee of the City in the individual capacity
thereof.
34
ARTICLE I%
Events of Default
Section 9.1. Events of Default Defined. The following shall be "Events of
Default" under this Agreement and the term "Event of Default" shall mean,
whenever it is used in this Agreement (unless the context otherwise provides), any
one or more of the following events:
(a) Failure by the Redeveloper to pay when due any payments or to provide
any funds required to be paid or provided under Article III or Article Vi of this
Agreement.
(b) -Failure by the Redeveloper to provide and maintain when due any letter
of credit required to be provided and maintained under Article iV or Article VI of
this Agreement.
(c) Failure by the Redeveloper to provide and maintain any i uurance
required to be provided and maintained by Section 5.1 of this Agreement or failure
by the Redeveloper to reconstruct the Minimum Improvements when required
pursuant to Section 5.1 of this Agreement.
(d) Failure by the Redeveloper to submit a commitment for financing to
the City In a timely manner pursuant to the terms and conditions of Section 7.1 of
this Agreement.
(a) Failure of the Redeveloper to submit satisfactory Construction Plans In
aceordaner with Section 4.2 of this Agreement.
(f) Failure by the Redeveloper to commence and complete construction of
the Minimum Improvements pursuant to the terms, conditions and limitations of
Article iV of this Agreement.
(g) Failure by the Redeveloper to substant!ally observe or perform any
covenant, condition, obligation or agreement on Its part to be observed or
performed hereunder.
(h) The Holder of any Mortgage exercises any remedy provided by the
Mortgage documents or exercises any remedy provided by law or equity in the
event of a default In any of the terms or conditions of the Mortgage.
(1) The Redeveloper shall:
(1) file any petition in bankruptcy or for any reorganization,
arrangement, composition, readjustment, liquidation, dissolution, or similar
relief under the United States Bankruptcy Act of 1978, as amended or under
any similar federal or state law; or
(Ii) make an assignment for the benefit of its creditors; or
(111) admit in writing its inability to pay its debts generally as they
become due; or
35
(iv) be adjudicated a bankrupt or insolvent; or if a petition or
answer proposing the adjudication of the Redeveloper as a bankrupt or its
similar federal or state ization under law Shan. be filedresent or rIn any court eral end such petitio oct Or r
answer shall not be discharged or denied within ninety (90) days after the
fDing thereof; or a receiver, trustee or liquidator of the Redeveloper
any
or of
the Redevelopment Property, or part thereof shall be appointed
proceed!,.; brought against the Redeveloper and shall not be discharged
within ninety (90) days after such appointment, or if the Redeveloper shall
consent to or acquiesce in such appointment.
Section 9.2. henever any Event of
to In Section 9.1 of this Agreement curs,emedies on Default. Vthe City may take any one �or more of
the following actions after providing thirty days written notice to the Redeveloper
of the Event of Default, but only if the Event of Default has not been cured within
said thirty days, or if the Event*of Default is incapable of beicg cured iwithin said
thirty day period, the Redeveloper falls to provide the City
assurances, &emed satisfactory In the reasonable Event of Default will be cured as soon as reasonably possible;
th written
n of the City, that the
(a) Suspend Its performcnce under the Agreement until It receives assur-
ances from' the Redeveloper, deemed adequate by the City, that the .Redeveloper
will cure its default and continue its performance under the Agreement.
(b) Terminate the Agreement.
(c) Draw upon the letters of credit provided to the City pursuant to
Sections 4.6 and 6.1 of this Agreement in accordance with the terms of Sections
4.6 and 6.1 of this Agreement.
(d) Withhold the Certificate of Completion.
(a) Withhold the Net Proceeds from the Insurance policies provided to the
City pursuant to Section 5.1 of this Agreement 1n a^cordance with the term:
policies.
(f) Take whatever action, including legal, equitable or administrative
ons
action, which ayappear necessary or desirae to the ments due under this Agreement, or to etntorce performancey, inuding any and
o collect any payments
y
observance of any obligation, agreement, or covenant of the Redeveloper under
this Agreement.
Section 9.3. Revestin Title in t„ — -•_ nce oft e
C__e•.ance to Redeveloper. In the event that subsequent to conveya
..
Redevelopment Property or any part thereof to the Redeveloper and prior to
receipt by the Redeveloper of the Certificate of Completion,
to begin
construction oftsubject
(a) the Redeveloper, he Minimum i provemen spin ci nfolDelays, rmittywith this llAgrelement and
such failure to begin construction is not cured within thirty (30) days after written
notice from the City to the Redeveloper to do so; or
36
,e) subject to Unavoldable Delayro, the Redeveloper after commencement of
the construction of the Minimum Improvements, fails to carry out Its obligations
with respect to the ccnatruction of the Minimum Improvements (including the
nature and the date for the completion thereof), or abandons or substantially
suspends construction work, and any such failure, abandonment, or suspension shall
not be cured, ended, or remedied within thirty (30) days after written demand from
the City to the Redeveloper to do so; or
(c) the Redeveloper fails to pay real estate taxes or assessments on the
Redevelopment Property or any part thereof when due, or creates, suffers,
assumes, or agrees to any encumbrance or lien on the Redevelopment Property
unauthorized by the Agreement, or shall suffer any Ievy or attachment to be made,
or any materialmen's or mechanics' lien, or any other unauthorized encumbrance or
lien to attach, and such taxes or assessments shall not have been paid, or the
encumbrance or lien removed or discharged or provision satisfactory to the City
made for such payment, removal, or discharge, within thirty (30) days after written
demand by the City to do so; provided, that if the Redeveloper shall first notify the
City of its intention to do so, it may In good faith contest any mechanic&' or other
lien filed or established and in such event the City shall permit such mechanical or
other lien to remain undischarged and tmsatisfled during the period of such contest
and any appeal, but only If the Redeveloper prc-tides the City with a bank letter of
credit or other security In the amount of the lien, in a form satisfactory to the
City pursuant to which the bank or other obligor will pay to the City the amount of
any lien in the event that the lien is finally determined to be valid and during the
course of such contest the Redeveloper shell keep the City Informed respecting the
status of such defense; or
(d) there is, in violation of the Agreement, any transfer of the Redevelop-
ment Property or any part thereof, or any ehange in the ownership or distribution
thereof )f the Redeveloper, or with respect to the identity of the parties in control
of the Redeveloper or the degree thereof, and such violation shall not be cured
within sixty (60) days after written demand by the City to the Redeveloper, or
(e) the Redeveloper falls to comply with any of its covenants under this
Agreement and fails to cure any such noncompliance or breach within thirty (30)
days after written demand from the City to the Redeveloper to do so; or
(f) the Holder of any Mortgage exercises any remedy provided by the
Mortgage documents or exercises any remedy provided by law or equity In the
event of a default In any of the terms or conditions of the Mortgage,
Then the City shall have the right to re-enter and take possession of the
Redevelopment Property and to terminate (and revest In the City) the estate
conveyed by the Redevelopment Property Deed to the. Redeveloper, It being the
intent of this provision, together with other provisions of the Agreement, that the
conveyance of the Redevelopment Property to the Redeveloper shall be made upon;
and that the Redevelopment Property Deed shall contain a condition subsequent to
the effect that In the event of any default on the part of the Redeveloper and
failure on the part of the Redeveloper to remedy, end, or abrogate such default
within the period and in the manner stated in such subdivisions, the City at Its
option may declare a termination in favor of the City of the title, and of all the
rights and interests in and to the Redevelopment Property convey. ' to the
Redeveloper, and that such title and all rights and Interests of the Redeveloper,
37
and any assigns or successors in interest to and in the Redevelopment Property,
shall revert to the City, but only if the events stated in Section 9.3(a)-(f) have not
been cured within the time periods provided above.
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Section 9.3 of
this Agreement, the City shall have no right to reenter or retake title to and
possession of a portion of the Redevelopment Property for which a Certificate of
Completion has been issued.
Section 9.4. Resale of Reacquired Property; Disposition of Proceeds, upon
the revesting in the City of title to and/or possession of the Redevelopment
Property or any part thereof as provided in Section 9.3, the City shell, pursuant to
Its responsibilities under law, use Ita best efforts to Bell the Redevelopment
Property or part thereof as soon and In such manner as the City shall find feasible
and consisteut with the objectives of such law and of the Program to a qualified'
and responsible party or parties (ei determined by the City) who will assume the
obligation of making or completing the Minimum Improvements or such other
improvements in their st•>_ad as shall be satisfactory to the City and in accordance
with the uses specified for such Redevelopment Property or part thereof in the
Program. Upon such resale of the Redevelopment Property, the proceeds thereof
shall be appiied:
(a) First, to reimburse the City for all costs and expenses incurred by the
City, including but not limited to salaries of personnel, In connection with the
recapture, management, and eesale of the Redevelopment Property or part thereof _
(but less any Income derived by the City from the property or part thereof in
connection with s,,ch management); all taxes, assessments, and water end sewer
charges with respect to the Redevelopment Property or part thereof (or, in the
event the Redevelopment Property is exempt from taxation or assessment �r such
charge during the period of ownership thereof by the City, an amount, if paid,
equal to such taxes, assessments, or charges (as determined by the City assessing
official) as would have been payable if the Redevelopment Property were not so
exempt); any payments made or necessary to he made to discharge any
encumbrances or liens existing on the Redevelopment Property or part thereof at
the time of revesting of title thereto in the City or to discharge or prevent from
attaching or being made any subsequent encumbrances or liens due to obligations,
defaults or acts of the Redeveloper, its successors or transferees; any expenditures
made or obligations Incurred with respect to the making or completion of the
Minimum Improvements or any part thereof on the Redevelopment Property or part
thereof; any projected loss of tax increment from the Redevelopment Property due
to the delay In development or redevelopment of the Redevelopment Property
caused by the default of the Redeveloper; and any amounts otherwise owing the
City by the Redeveloper and its successor or transferee; and
(b) Second, to reimburse the Redeveloper, its successor or transferee, up to
the amount equal to (1) the sum of the purchase price paid by It for the
Redevelopment Property (or allocable to the part thereof) and the cash actually
invested by it in making any of the Mini-Xin Improvements on the Redevelopment
Property or part thereof, less (2) any gains or income withdrawn or made by It from
the Agreement or the Redevelopment Property.
Any balance remaining after such reimbursements shall be retained by the City as
its property.
38
Section 9.5. No Aemedv EzelUalve. No remedy herein conferred upon or
reserved to the Clty le Intended to be axeluaive of any other available remedy or
remedies, but each and every such remedy shall be cumulative and shall be in
r''ition to every other remedy given under this Agreement or now or hereafter
existing at law or in equity or by statute. No delay or omission to exercise any
right or power accruing upon any default shall impair any such right or power or
shall be construed to be a waiver thereof, but any such right and power may be
exercised from time to time and as often as may be deemed expedient. in order to
entitlo the City or the Redevelop:r to exercise any remedy reserved to it, it ahall
not be neceaury to give notice, other than such notice as nay be required in this
Article 1R.
Section 9.6. No Additional Waiver imolled by One Waiver. In the event any
agreement contained in this Agreement should be breached by either party aad .
thereafter waived by the other party, such waiver shall be limited to the particular
breach so wa:+ed and shall not be deemed to waive any other concurrent, previous
or sub:;equent breach hereunder.
39
ARTICLE Z
Additional Provisions
Section 10.1. Conflict of interests. 3tv Representatives Not Individually
Liable. No member, official, or employee of the City shall have any personal
interest, direct or Indirect, in the Agreement, nor shall any such member, official,
or employee participate in any decision relating to the Agreement which affects
his personal interests or the Interests of any corporation, partnership, or
association in which he is, directly or Indirectly, interested. No member, official,
or employee of the City shall be personally liable to the Redeveloper, or any
successor in interest, in the event of any default or breach by the City or for any
amount which may become due to the Redeveloper or successor or on any
obligations under the terms of the Agreement, except in the case of willful
misconduct.
Section 10.2. Equal Employments oaunity. The Redeveloper, for itself
and its successors and assigns, agrees that during the construction of the Mlnlmum
Improvements provided for in the Agreement that it will comply with an applicable
equal employment opportunity and non-discrimination laws, ordinances an!
regulations.
Section 10.3. Restrictions on Use. The Redeveloper agrees for itself, and
Its successors and assigns, and evens+ successor in Interest to the Redevelopment
Property, or any part thereof, that the Redeveloper, and such successors and (,
assigns, shall devote the Redevelopment Property to, and only to and In accordance
with, the uses specified in the Program and this Agreement.
Section 10.4. Provisions Not Meraed With Deed. None of the provisions of
this Agreement are intended to or shall be merged by reason of any deed
transferring any interest in the Redevelopment Property and any such deed shall
not be deemed to affect or impair the provisions and covenants of this Agreement.
Section 10.5. Titles of Articles and Sections. Any titles of the sev:ral
p-irts, Articles, and Sections of the Agreement are inserted for convenience of
reference only and shall be disregarded in construing or interpreting any of its
provisions.
Section 10.6. Notices and Demands. Except as otherwise expressly provided
in this Agreement, a notice, demand, or other communication under the Agreement
by either party to the other shall be sufficiently given or delivered if it is
dispatched by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt re-
quested, or delivered personally; and
(a) In the case of the Redeveloper, is addressed to or delivered
personally to the Redeveloper at 2685 Long Lake Road, Roseville, Minnesota
55113; and
(b) in the case of the City, is addressed to or delivered personally to the
City at 2401 Highway 10, Mounds View, Minnesota 55112;
to
40
r_
or at such other address with respect to either such party as that party may, from
time to time, designate In writing and forward to the other as provided In this
Section.
Section 10.7. Counterparts. This Agreement Is executed in any number of
counterparts, each of which shall constitute one and the same Instrument.
41
ARTICLE XI
Termination of Agreement
Section 11.1. Termination of Agreement. Either party to this Agreement
may terminate this Agreement upon the occurrence of the following.
(a) All governmental permits and other approvals necessary for the
construction of the Minimum Improvements have not been granted to the
Redeveloper by December 31, 1987.
(b) The Environmental impact Statement has not been determined to be
adequate by either the City or a court of competent jurisdiction by December 31;
1987.
(c) The City has failed to give its approval to the Redeveloper's request
for Planned Unit Developmeat approval with respect to the Minimum
improvements be December 31, 1987.
(d) The City has failed to issue the Bonds by anu 311 1988.
Section 11.2. Effect of Termination. Upon a termination of this Agreement
pursuant to this Article Xi, this Agreemett shall be null and void and neither party
shall have any further obligations or liabilities hereunder; provided, however, upon �-
such termination the Redeveloper shall pay to the City an amount equal to the
city
prep1arationBond3 and the
and costs
Incurred
Implementation of this Agreement, which ocostsashall spefl fica ly
Include but not be limited to the City's costs of preparing plans and specifications
for the Public Improvements. Upon such a termination the Redeveloper shall
deliver such documents to the City as may be necessary to evidence the
terminatnterest wch
obtainediby he Redeveloper Inis Areement antheeRedevelopment release of any iP opertyhaiss amesult have b een
of the
execution of this Agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City has caused this Agreement to be duly
executed in Its name and behalf and Its seal to be hereunto duly affixed and the
Redeveloper has caused this Agreement to be duly ctecuted In Its name and behalf
on or as of the date first above written.
THE CITY OF
MOUNDS VIEW, MINNESOTA
By
And by
42
This Instrument was dratted by:
HOLMES & GRAVEN, Chartered
470 Pillsbury Center
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402
EVEREST DEVELOPMENT, LTD.
By
Its
And by
Its
COMMERCIALPROPERTY INVESTMENTS
By
Its
And by
Its _
43
Johnson Parcel:
SCHEDULE A
DESCRIPTION OF REDEVELOPMENT PROPERTY
44
C
SCHEDULE H
QUiT CLAIM DEED
THiS INDENTURE, between The City of Mounds View, Minnesota, a
municipal corporation (the "Grantor"), and Everest Development, Ltd., a Minnesota
corporation (the "Grantee").
WITNESSETH, that Grantor, in consideration of the sum of One Dollar
($1.00) and other good and valuable consideration the receipt whereof is hereby
en tits
he
acknowledged, does before grant,r, ll the tract oar parcel of land lying and being intclaim and ccnveY to the he
successors and assignsas
or par eof Ramsey l of land 1s hereinafter referred Minnesota a dethe scri'b'Prooerbll' follows, to wir. (such tree
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
To have and to hold the same, togetherwith
all
the to the reditsaidGrant a eaments els
nd
appurtenances thereunto belonging In anywise appertaining,
successors and assigns, forever,
Provided:
SECTION 1.
it is understoa9 0!"1 agreed that this Deed is subject
to the covenants�
between the
conditions, restrictions and provisions of agreement , 198 , identified as
Grantor and Grantee on the Y
"Contract for Private Redevelopment" (hereafter referred to as the "Agreementas
")
and that the Grantee shall not convey this Property, or any pert thereof sin the
y or such
permitted by the A¢reemeRLuntil a certificatet as of completion releasing the
part (thereof thencertain
do be conveyed, ations hassaid
beeneemenplaced of to
PrThistprovision,
however, shall in no way prevent the Grantee from mortgaging this Property In
order er, obtain funds for the purchase of the Property :,ereby conveyed and for
erecting improvements thereon In conformity with the Agreement, any applicable
redevelopment plan and applicable provisions of the zoning ordinance of the City of
Mounds View, Minnesota
It is specifically agreed that the Grantee shall promptly begin and diligently
prosecute
of the improvements thereon,velopment as provided f the Property rough the construc-
tion the Agreement.
Promptly after complthe etionrovements
furnishntheyGrantee withwith thr
provisions of the Agreement,
tifying. Such certification the Grantor shall
tio
appropriate instrument so eell of
(and (and It shall be so provided in the certIf! anon Issed cl covenants�of the Algreement
satisfaction and termination of the agr
and of this Deed with respect to the obligation of the Grantee, and its successors
and assigns, to construct the improvements and the dates for the beginning and
completion thereof. Such certification and such determination shall not constitute
evidence of compliance with or satisfaction of any obligatlon of the Grantee to any
holder of a mortgage, or any Insurer of a mortgage, securing money loaned to
finance the pureahsa of the Property hereby conveyed or the improvenents, or any
part thereof.
All certifications provided for herein shall be in such form as will enable
them to be recorded with the County Recorder, or Registrar of Titles, Ramsey
County, Minnesota. If the Grantor shall refuse or fall to provide any such
certification in accordance with the provisions of the Agreement and this Deed,
the Grantor shall, within thirty (30) days after written request by the Grantee,
provide the Grantee with a written statement indicating in adequate detail in what
respects the Grantee has failed to complete the Improvements In accordance with
the provisions of the Agreement or is otherwise In default, and what measures or
sets it will be uecessary, in the opinion of the Grantor, for the Grantee to take or
perform in order to obtain such certification.
SECTION 2.
In the event the Grantee herein shall, prior to the recording of the
certificate of completion hereinabove referred to:
(a) Subject to Unavoidable Delays (as defined in the Agreement),
fail to begin construction of the Minimum improvements (as defined in the
Agreement) in conformity with the Agreement and such failure is not cured
within thirty (30) days after written notice from the Grantor to the Grantee
to do so; or
(b) Subject to Unavoidable Delays (as defined in the Agreement),
fail to carry out its obligations with respect to the construction of the
Minimum Improvements (as defined in the Agreement), or shall abandon or
substantially suspend construction work, and any failure, abandonment or
suspension shall not be cured, ended or remedied within thirty (30) days
after written demand from the Grantor to the Grantee to do so; or
(c) Fall to pay real estate taxes or assessments on the Property or
any part thereof when due, or create, suffer, assume, or agree to any
encumbrance or lien on the Property unauthorized by the Agreement wish
the Grantor, or shall suffer any levy or attachment to be made, or any
materialmen's or mechanic's liens, or any other unauthorized encumbrances
or liens to attach, and such taxes or assessments shall not have been paid or
the encumbrance or lien removed or discharged, or provisions satisfactory to
the Grantor made for such payments, removal or discharge, within thirty
(30) days after written demand by the Grantor to do so, provided, that If the
Grantee shall first notify the Grantor of Its intention to do so, It me; In
good faith contest any mechanics' or other lien filed or established and In
such event the Grantor shall permit such mechanics' or other lien to remain
undischarged and unsatisfied during the period of such contest and any
appeal, but only if the Grantee provides the Grantor with a bank letter of
credit in the amount of the lien or such other collateral as the Grantor may
request, all In a form satisfactory to the Grantor so that the amount of any ltd
lien will be paid in the event that the lien is finally determined to be valid
13-2
and during the course of such contest the Grantee shall keep the Grantor
informed respecting the status of such defense; or
(d) Cause or permit, in violation of the Agreement, any transfer
of the Property or any part thereof, or any change in the ownership or
distribution thereof of the Grantee, or with respect to the identity of the
parties in control of the Grantee or the degree thereof, and such violation
shall not be cured within sixty (60) days after written demand by the
Grantor to the Grantee; or
(e) Fail to comply with any of Its covenants under the Agreement
and fail to cure any such noncompliance or breach within thirty (30) days
after written demand from the Grantor to the Grandee to do so;
then the Grantor shall have the right to re-enter and take possession of the
Property and to terminate and revest in the Grantor the estate conveyed by this
Deed to the Grantee, its assigns or successors In interast; but only It theeents
stated in Section 2(a)-(e) have not been cured within the time Pe provided
above.
SBCTiON 3.
The Grantee agrees for Itself and its successors and assigns to or of the
Property or say part thereof, hereinbefore described, that the Grantee and such
successors and assigns shall:
(a) Devote the Property to, and only to and in accordance with
the uses specified in any applicable municipal development district plan as
amended and extended;
(b) Not discriminate on the basis of race, color, creed, netio.^.el
origin, or sex In the sale, lease, rental, or In the use or occupancy of the
Property or any Improvements erected or to be erected thereon, or any part
thereof;
(a) Not cause the Property to be removed from the public tax
rolls or to become exempt from assessment for general real estate taxes by
reason of any conveyance, lease, abatement, or other action so long as tax
increment generated by the Property is pledged to the payment of the
principal of and Interest due on outstanding bonds or other obligations;
(d) Not apply for or seek through administrative or judicial
proceedings a reduction in real property taxes If such reduction would
reduce taxes to an amount below the amount needed to pay the principal and
Interest due on ''the tends or other obligations for which tax increment
generated by the Property is pledged; and
(e) Comply with the provisions of Sections 5.1, 6.1, and 6.3 of the
Agreement relating to Insurance coverage, tax guaranty payments, and the
payment of real property taxes.
it Is intended and agreed that the above and foregoing agreements and
covenants shell be covenants running with the land, and that they shall, in any
H-3
• r
event, and without regard to technical classification or designation, legal or
otherwise, and except only as otherwise specifically nd a provided
it videdtIn this benefit end be
binding, to the fullest extent the
mitted Grantor by
gainst the Grantee, its successors and
favor, s, and enforceable by, or art thereof or any
satire, and every and any
interest orthe rocc occupancy ofythe Property or any
interest therein, and any party possession
part thereof.
in amplification, and not in restriction of, the provisions of the preceding
section, it Is intended and agreed that the Grantor shall be deemed beneficiaries of
the agreements and covenants provided herein, both for and In its owA t e other
also for the purposes of protecting the interest of the commu,-,*
paritesr pub!lc or private, in whose favor or for whose benefit these agreements
and covenants have been provided. Such agreements and covenants shall run jn
favor of the Grantor without reagrd to whether the Grantor has at any time been,
remains, or is an owner of any land or interest therein to, or in favor of, which each
agreements and covenants agreement or covenant te. The Grantor tto exercisel have the ]ght, In the event of
all the rights and
re breach d any such aan
remedies, and to maintain any actions cr suits at law or ,c equity or other proper
proceedings to enforce the curing of such breach of ag Bement or covenant, to
prow ded o howevere Grantee's�pers personal o bligationsnt or hereunder ant a any othr y be shalltermin to 20
years from the date of this Deed, or sooner as provided In the Agreement.
SECTION 4.
This Deed is also giver subject to:
(a) Covenants, conditions and restrictions contained in the Mounds
View Municipal Development District Plan Number 1, as amended as of the
date of the Agreement.
(b) Provision of the ordinances, building and7onin sing o tar laws of they
the
City of Mounds View, state and federal laws and regulations
affect this real estate.
(c) Provisions of that certain Deie0 n er's Agreement between the
Grantor and Grantee, dated +
(d) Taxes payable subsequent to the date of this conveyance.
B-4
r.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has caused this Deed to be duly
executed in Its behalf by its and and has caused
Its corporate seal to be hereunto affixed this day of , 19_
THE CITY OF MOUNDS ViEW, MINNESOTA
By
Its
By
Its
STATE OF MiNNESOTA 3
COUNTY OF I
On this day of _ , 19 , before me, a notary public
within and for Anoka County, personally appeared and
to me personally kncrm who by sae duly sworn, did ;ay
that tney are the mad eI The Tito of
Mounds View (the "City'9 named in the foregcing instrument; that the seal affixed
to said instrument is the seal of said City; that said instrument was signed and
sealed on behalf of said City pursuant to a resolution
Council;
and id
and acknowledgedd d Instrument
to
be the —'free and deed of said City.
This instrument was drafted by:
Holmes & Graven, Chartered
470 Pillsbury Center
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402
Notary Public
B-5
SCHEDULE C
ASSESsfdENT AGREEMENT
and
ASSESSOR'S' CERTD?ICATION
By acd among
o•, ,.lvvrarn e. r'"
-i'tiii Cal OF invva:uv ..u..r �� --•
�hGOMMBRrUL PROPERTY INVESTMENTS, INC.
M
COUNTY ASSESSOR OF THE COUNTY OF RAMSEY
This Document was drafted by:
HOLMES & GRAVEN, Chartered
470 Pillsbury Center
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402
ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, made on or as of the _ day of ,
and among The City of Mounds View, Minnesota, a municipal
corporation (the "City'),ACommercial Property investments. inc., a Minnesota
corporation (the "Redeveloper'), and the County Assessor of the County of Ramsey
(the "Assessor").
WITNESSETH, that
WHEREAS, on or before the date hereof the City and Redeveloper an
Everest Development, Ltd.p have entered into a Contract for Private
Redevelopment (the "Redevelopment Contract") regarding certain real property
located in the City of Mounds View, pursuant to which the City 1s to acquire
certain property, hereinafter referred to as the "Redevelopment Property" and
legally described in Exhibit P_ hereto and convey said Redevelopment Property to
the Redeveloper; and
WHEREAS, it is contemplated that pursuant to said Redevelopment
Contract the Redeveloper will construct a
upon the Redevelopment Property (the "MI, mum Improvements"); and
WHEREAS, the City and Redeveloper desire to establish a minimum market
val'-'e for said -Redcvelopmert mpsrty a4d V4 in
laimum improvements to be
constructed thereon, pursuant to Minnr-cte Statutes, Section 469.1"", Subdivision
9; and
WHEREAS, the City and the Assessor have reviewed the preliminary plans
and specifications for the Minimum improvements which it is contemplated will be
erected;
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties to this Agreement, in consideration of the
promises, covenants and agreements made by each to the other, do hereby agree as
follows.
1. Upon substantial completion of construction of the above -referenced
Minimum Improvements by the Redeveloper, as evidenced by the delivery to the
Redeveloper from the City of the Certificate of Completion (as defined in the
Redevelopment Contract), the minimum market value which shall be assessed for
the Redevelopment Property described In Exhibit A, with the Minimum
Improvements constructed thereon, for ad valorem tax purposes, shall be
Dollars ($ ). The parties to this Agreement expect
that the construction of the above -referenced Minimum Improvements will be
completed on or before
2. The minimum market value herein established shall be of no further
force and effect and this Agreement shall terminate on the earlier of the
following: (a) January 2, 2009; or (b) The date when the tax increment bonds issued
by the City and referred to in the Redevelopment Contract a; the Bonds have been
paid in full and retired.
The events referred to in Sections 2(b) of this Agreement shall be evidenced by a
certificate or affidavit executed by the City.
C-1
- r•
3. This Agreement shall be promptly recorded by the Redeveloper with
a copy of Minnesota Statutes. Section 462.171 Subdivisloo 8, set forth in Exhibl: B
hereto. The Redeveloper shall pay all costs of recording.
4. Neither the preambles nor provisions of this Agreement are intended
to, nor shall they be construed as, modifying the terms of the Redevelopment
Contract between the City and the Redeveloper.
S. This Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the
successors and assigns of the parties.
6. Each of the parties has authority to enter Into this Agreement and to
take all actions required of It, and has taken all actions necessary to authorize the
execution and delivery of this Agreement.
7. in the event any provision of this Agreement snall he held Invsltd and
unenforceable by any court of competent jurisdiction, such holding shrJ1 not
Invalidate or render unenforceable any other provision hereof.
8. The parties hereto agree that they will, from time to time, execute,
ackno,dedge and deliver, or cause to be executed, acimowledged and delivered,
such supplements, amendments and modifications hereto, and such further
instruments as may reasonably be required for correcting any Inadequate, or
inLarrect, or amended description of the Redevelopment Property oe the Minimum
improvements, or for carrying out the expressed intention of this Agreement,
Including, without limitation, any further instruments required to delete from the
description of the Redevelopment Property such part or parts as may be included
within a separate assessment agreement.
9. Except as provided in Section 8 of this Agreement, this Agreement
may not be amended nor any of its terms modified except by a writing authorized
and executeu 7y ell parties hereto.
10. This Agreement may be simultaneously executed in several
counterparts, each of which shall be an original and all of which shall constitute
but one and the same Instrument.
11. Thfs Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance
with the laws of the State of Minnesota.
THE CITY OF MOUNDS V'EW, MI NNESOTA
By
its
By
its
C-2
W
By
Its
And By
Its
C-3
BY COUNTY ASSESSOF
The undersigned, having reviewed the plans and specifications for the
improvements to be constructed and the market value assigned to the land upon
which the improvements are to be constructed, and being of the opinion .hat the
minimum market value contained in the foregoing Agreement appears reasonable,
hereby certifies as follows: The undersigned Assessor, being legally responsible for
the assessment of the above described property, hereby certifies that the market a
value assigned to such land and Improvements upon completion of the improve-
ments to be constructed thereon shall not be less titan
Dollars (S t until termination of this
Agreement.
County Assessor for the County
of Ramsey
STATE OF MiNNESOTA )
SS
COUNTY OF RAMSEY )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of
19 by , the County Assessor of the
County of Ramsey.
Notary Public
l�
C-4
4
Y
EXHIBIT A
Legal Description of Land
C-5
r—
EXHIBIT B
SectloqkgL.177t Subd. 8. Assessment agreements. An authority may, upon
entering Into a development or redevelopment agreement pursuant to section
489.176 subdivision 5, enter into a written assessmer* agreement In recordable
form with he developer or redeveloper of property within the tax Increment
financing district which establishes a minimum market value of the land and
completed Improvements to be constructed thereon until a specified termination
date, which date shall be not later than the date upon jYhIch tax Increment will no
longer be remitted to the authority pursuant to sectlorOL69.178A subdivision 1. The
assessment agreement shall be presented to the county assessor, or city assessor
having the powers of the county assessor, of the jurisdiction in which the tax
Increment financing district Is located. The assessor shall review the plans and
specifications for the Improvements to be constructed, review the market value
previmisly usigned to the laud upon which the improvements are to be constructed
and, so long as the minimum market value contained in the assessment agreement
appears, In the judgment of the assessor, to be a reasonable estimate, shall execute
the following certification upon such agreement:
The undersigned assessor, being legally responsible for the assessment
of the above -described property upon completion of the Improve-
ments to be constructed thereon, hereby certifies that the market
value assigned to such land and improvements upon completion shall
not be less than $ _
Upon transfer of title of the land to be developed or redeveloped from the `
authority to the developer or redeveloper, such essessmert agreement, together
with a copy of this subdivision, shall be fi'.ed for record and recorded in the office
of the county recorder or filed In the office of the registrar of titles of the county
where the real estate or any part thereof is situated. Upon completion of the
improvements by the developer or redeveloper, the assessor shall value the
property pursuant to Section 273.11, except that the market value assigned thereto
shall not be less than the minimum market value contained in the assessment
agreement. Nothing herein shall limit the discretion of the assessor to assign a
market value to the property In excess of the minimum market value contained in
the assessment agreement nor prohibit the developer or redeveloper from seeking,
through the exercise of administrative and legal remedies, a reduction In market
value for property tax purposes; provided, however, that the developer or redevel-
oper shall not seek, nor shall the city assessor, the county assessor, the county
auditor, any board of review, any board of equalization, the commissioner of
revenue or any court of this state grant a reduction of the market value below the
minimum market value contained in the assessment agreement during the term of
the agreement filed of record regardless of actual market values which may result
from incomplete construction of Improvements, destruction or diminution by any
cause, Insured or uninsured, except In the case of acquisition or reacquisition of the
property by a public entity. Recording or filing of an assessment agreement
complying with the terms of this subdivision shall constitute notice of the
agreement to any subsequent purchaser or encumbrancer of the land or any part
thereof, whether voluntary or involuntary, and stiall be binding upon them.
C-6
r SCHEDULE D
WHBREA9, The City of Mounds View, Minnesota, a municipal corporation
(the "Grantor"), by a Deed recorded in the Office at i`.9 County Rce°rder or the
end J respectively, has conveyed to
Registrar t Titles In and for the County of An
and State of Minnesota, e9 Dee
Document velopmNumber(s) _ ration (the "Grantee"10 the following
Everest Development, Ltd.,a Minnesota corpo
described land in County of Ramsey and State of Minnesota,ta-wit:
and
WHEREAS, said Deed contained certain covenants and restrictions, the
ssors and assigns, said covenants and
breach of which by Grantee, its successors and assigns, would result in a forfeiture
and right of re-enty by Grantor, Its succe
restrictions being *-ot forth in Sections 1 and 2 of said Deed; an
ts and conditions
WHEREAS, said Grantee has performed said co Grantor to permit the
insofar as it is able In ut annerhis dee ed s fficient by
execution and recording
NOW, THEREFORE, this is to certify that all building he Grantee and
other physical Improvements specified to be done and made by the Grantee have
eed have been
been completed and the above covenants and rovistoconditins for ons nforfeisaid t re of title and
performed by the for breachtee ofcondition suein and that the bsequent by the Grantor therein is
right to re-entry lies to the land described
hereby released absolutely and forever Insofar rar of Tiles in and for the County of
herein, and the County Recorder or the Reg
Anoka and State of Minnesota is hereby authorized to accept for recording and
D-1
to record, the filing of this instrument, to be a conclusive determination of the t 1
satisfactory termination of the covenants and conditions of the contract referred
to in said Deed, the breach of which would result In a forfeiture and right of re-
entry, but the covenants created by Section 3 of said Deed shall remain in full
force and effect.
Dated: , 19 .
THE CITY OF
MOUNDS VIEW, MINNESOTA
(SEAL)
By
Its
By
Its
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
ss.
COUNTY OF )
On this day of , 1.9_, before me, a Notary Public
within and for said County, personally appeared , to me
personally known, who, being by me duly sworn, did say that (s)he is the
of the City named in the foregoing instrument; that
the seal affixed to said Instrument is the seal of said City; that said Instrument was
signed and sealed in behalf of said City by authority of its Council; and said
acknowledged said instrument to be the free act and deed
of said City.
Notary Public
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
ss.
COUNTY OF )
On this day of , 19 , before me, a Notary Public
within and f [ Bald County, personally appeared , to me
personally known, who, being by me duly sworn, did say that (s)he Is the
of the City named In the foregoing instrument; that the
seal affixed to said instrument Is the seal of said City; that said instrument was
signed and sealed in behalf of said City by authority of its Council; and said
acknowledged said Instrument to be the free act and deed
of said City.
Notary Public
D-2
(1
sCREDULE E
Permitted Encumbrances
Tha following shall be permitted encumbrances on the title to the
Redevelopment Property:
(a) such encumbrances as are mutually agreed to in writing by the City
and the Redeveloper;
(b) any encumbrances or defects in the title not of record not known to
the Redeveloper, but known to the Redeveloper on a date twenty (20) days from
the date of City's receipt of a commitment for title insurance for the
Redevelopment Property;
(c) governmental regulations, If any, affecting the use and cceupaney of
the Redevelopment Property and Minimum Improvements)
(d) zoning laws of the City, County, and State;
(e) all rights in pubic hignways upon the Sand;
(f) reservations to the State, in trust for the taxing districts concerned,
of minerals and mineral rights in those portions of the Redevelopment Property the
title to which may have at any time heretofore been forfeited to the State for
nonpayment of real estate taxes;
(g) the lien of unpaid special assessments, if any, not presently payable
but to be paid as a prt of the annual taxes to become due; and
(h) the lien of unpaid real estate taxes, if any, not presently payable but
to be paid as a part of the annual taxes to become due.
E-1
SCHEDULE F
IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT NO.
TO: City of
We hereby Issue an Irrevocable stand-by Letter of Credit No. In
favor of the City of , Minnesota (the "City'9, for account of
(the "Redeveloper" ), which Is available by negotiation of
C(ty's draft at sight on or before the day of , 19_1 for
100% of statement value, up iu an amount not to exceed
Dollar;, arcompanied by a written
statement, substantially in the form of the wrlttea statement attached hereto as
Exhibit A, executed by the of the City or Ito designee,
bee -Ping the number of this Letter of Credit and stating that the amount of the
Clty's draft covers the Indebtedness of the Redeveloper to the City provided for in
Section 4.6, of the Contract For Private Redevelopment by and between the City
of and dated as of the day
of , 19_, as amended.
We hereby agree with the City that all drafts drawn under and in substantial
compliance with the terms of this credit will be duly honored on presentation.
This credit shall be constnied in accordance with the laws of the State of
Minnesota Including, In particular, Minnesota Statutes, Sections 336.5-101 to 336.5-
117 (Uniform Commerclal Code, Article 5, Letters of Credit).
By
Its
F-1
17—iff—ritV
TOs
The undersigned (or designee of the
) for the City cf , Minnesota (the "City")
hereby states that the amount of the draft accompanying this statement covers the
Indebtedness of (the "Redeveloper') to the City
provided for In Section 4.6, is the case may be, of the Contract For Private
Redevelopment by and between The City of and
, dated as of the day of ,
19 , as amended.
The accompanying draft is drawn on Irrevocable Letter Credit
No.
THE CITY OF
,MINNESOTA
By
Its
F-2
SCHBDULS Q �.
Contract for Deed
E
C-1
SCREDULZI
Description oi—IUbIlL �IMWVM�011tl
1-1
SCHBDULBJ
Construction Schedule for Pub' lo Improvements
Is
SCHEMER
Form MfO-2fnfon of lledeveloper'e LeQel Counsel
N
Lis
K-1
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
day STATE OF MINNESOTA
MOUNDS VIEW DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 87-81
Mounds View Business Park
THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into this day
of , 19_, by and between the CITY OF
MOUNDS VIEW, County of Ramsey, State of Minnesota, pdrty of the
first part, hereinafter called the "City",
and Everest Development, Ltd., and Commercial Property Invest
(CPI) eemmareial-Property-Investment
party of the second part, hereinafter called the "Dovelopee",
W I T N E S S E T H:
WHEREAS, the Developer, in consideration of, approval
_ of the Development Plans for Mounds View 3usiness Park
and the issuance of permits thereof, hereby agrees with the City c
to perform all of the acts required herein and to conform to all
of the conditions set forth as follows:
1. Wherever the word "City" appears herein, it shall
mean and include the City of Mounds View and also said City's
agents and employees; and wherever the word "Developer" appears
herein, it shall mean the developer, and any if its agents and
employees. Wherever the words "development site" appears herein,
it shall mean the premises described in the following exhibits:
Exhibit 1 - Site Development Plan dated June, 1987
Exhibit 2 - Preliminary and Final Plat dated Jane, 1987
Exhibit 3 - Contract for Private Redevelopment
Exhibit 4 - Elevations, Office/Service Building 1, Light
Industrial Building 2, and Preliminary Landscape
Plans dated June 10, 1987
Rvhihit 5 - Sanitary Sewer, Watermain, Storm Sewer and Street
Wherever the words "public improvement" appear herein, it
shall mean any improvement defined under Chapter 26.04,
Sub. 1, of the Municipal Code, and shall include and not be
limited to streets, curbs, and gutters, sanitary sewer and
water installations, storm water and drainage installations.
2. This document shall be referred to as the "Develop-
ment Contract and said document cannot be transferred or assigned
except pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Contract for
A'
Private Redevelopment, Exhibit 3.
3. All improvements required herein to be performed by
the Developer shall be constructed and paid for by said
Developer pursuant to appropriate permits and approval from any
governmental agency, such approval and any environmental
assessments or environmental impact statements required to be
obtained by and prepared at the expense of said Developer."}
4, F.t1 public improvements, if any, required to be
constructed by the Developer pursuant to this Agreement: shall
be Derformed by the Developer with such materiels an, .c,uiFrent
as required by the city under the direct supervision of the City
and shall be in conformance with any and all rrlulations in force
at the time of construction, and the City is hereby granted the
right of access to the development site to inspect said
{
n
construction at such times as the City may direct.
5. The Developer shall, and hereby does, agree to pay
when due and before they become delinquent, all valid taxes
and assessments, if any, there ever be levied against said
development site or portion thereof.
-2-
6, The City shall not be under any obligation or
responsibility to act as engineer -consultant to the Developer
in any matter related to this Agreement or to any public
improvements required on said site by the City, or to act as
inspector and report to said Developer any defect or failure,
hazard or inadeq,iacy or otherwise relative to said site
development; any actual or implied approval by the City in
respect to any development shall not serve either to alter or
extinguish or to otherwise affect the responsibility, obliga-
tion or liability of the Developer in this.
7. The Developer shall not unnecessarily damage or
a
int
erference
Eerenc e with drainage ways or
ob
struct
uct m or cause !
drainage works located within or adjacent to said dvvelopmen t '
contractor or other agents to d
o SO -
site, or permit its
public improve-
C8. The Developer shall not alter any of the
ments located on said site except if and as elsewhere herein
icularly in each instance authorize6 in
provided or as part
b the City. ,
writing Y roved,
9. Surface drainac: to be constructed and approved,
beofre and after construction, by the City Inspection Depart-
ment. roved by
10. All drainage easements required by the PUD app
the City shall be granted by the Developerr without cost to the
City, as required.
11. The Developer agrees to conform to all of the applicable
s amended from
requirements of the Mounds View Municipal Code, a
time to time, and particularly Chapters 26r 39, 40, 42, 48, 49,
�+ 49A, 59, 60, 61, 62 and 63.
-3_
12. Developer herein agrees pursuant to provisions of the
Mounds View Municipal Code, Chapter 49.07, Subd. 6, to pay,
prior to the approval of the permits required, the reasonable
and necessary expenses incurred by the City in the processing,
review and evaluation of the proposed development and in the
g
inspection of all work performed pursuant to said contract.
Such costs shall include administrative, legal, and engineering
j
expensee incurred and allocatable to the project.
13. Developer agrees that the City can terminate develop-
ment of the development site or the construction of any building
structures thereon if the terms of this Development Contract have
not been conformed to by the developer. In addition, in the
;=;q
event the Developer fails to conform to the conditions of this
Agreement, the City shall be entitled to enforce it pursuant to
the terms of this contract and/or the provisions of the Mounds
View Home Rule Charter, Chapter 26 of the Municipal Code or
4-c
" l'
applicable Minnesot - ...tuts'.
14. It is understood and hereby agreed by and between the:
parties he.;to that any plans or data supplied by the City
within or adjacent to said development site are approximations
only and that the City explicitly does not pretent or guarantee
or warrant any such plans or data to be either complete or
correct.
15. The Developer shall not unnecessarily create, cause or
suffer to exist or to continue to exist, any nuisance or hazard
to persons or property within or adjacent to said site by reason
of said public improvements, development of the site or other
operations in respect thereof or permit its agents, engineers or
contractors to do so.
-4-
16. When applicable, three complete sets of plans and
specifications or directions for any public improvement to be
constructed on said site, each bearing the certificate and
seal of a professional engineer duly registeree .n the State of
Minnesota, shall be submitted to the City well in advance of the
time proposed for commencing construction thereof. The City
shall have a period of not Less than 30 days in which to examine
and review the plans and specifications submitted by the
Developer and to reply to the Developer with respect to the
adequacy oz inadequacy of the plans and specifications. Upon
final approval of the plan and specifications within a
reasonable time following completion of the installation, the
Developer shall furnish and deliver three sets of "as built"
plans thereof to the City. If any public improvements are to
d be constructed on said site by the City, the necessary easements
and right of ways shall be grated to the City at the expense of
the Developer including the costs of the preparation of the right
of way documents and filing. The Developer fu.ther agre__ 3
grant to the City such easements over, under and across the
development site, at no cost co the City, as are reasonably
nece'ss3ry for the maintenance of any public improvement
constructed on the development site. The Developer shall
establish permanent reference marks, reasonably satisfactory to
shown locations of the public improvements constructed on the
development site.
17. In the case of a multiple dwelling, commercial or
industrial development or any use combining any of the afore-
said uses, the Developer agrees on behalf of itself, its heirs,
successors or assigns to permanently maintain the site desceibed
-5-
herein pursuant to the terms of this development contract, and
said Developer shall not permit the premise3 to deteriorate or
become blighted or t, constitute a public nuisance. Enforcement
of this provision shall be pursuant to the terms of this contract
_-
or the provisions of the applicable Minnesota Statutes, the
Mounds View Home Rule Charter, and the Municipal Code. In the
_-
event of nonconformance by the Developer, the City shall seek
mandatory relief, after written notice of the alleged violations,
pursuant to the terms of this contract to enforce this provision
and may proceed to abate public nuisances and to assess the cost
of said abatement, including all costs, disbursements, legal fees
Y.
against the development site, as provided for in the Home Rule
Charter, Chapter 26 of the Municipal Code, and such other appli-
cable ordinances and Minnesota Statutes. The Developer's obliga-
tions under this paragraph shall immediately terminate, with
respect to the Developer, upon the Developer's transfer or
conveyance of its entire '.nterest in the development site
provided the successor or assignee assumes bai9 oL-.igations.
18. The development site shall be developed as indicated
on the attached site plan, referred to as Exhibit 1. The site
plan'and the development to be constructed thereon may be
amended from time to time by the mutual -itten consent of the
parties hereto, in conformance with the Municipal Code of the
city.
19. In addition to all of the provisions recited herein -
before, the Developer agrees to the following conditions as more
fully set out in Exhibit 2A attached hereto and made a part
hereof.
- o -
20. The provisions of this contract are severable, and in
the event that any provision of this agreement is found invalid,
the remaining provisions shall remain in full force and effect.
This agreement is made and executed pursuant to and under
authority of Resolution No.
adopted by the City the
19 , and by resolution or authorized
day of ' —
signature of the Developer.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed these
presents the day and year first above written.
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
By Its Mayor
By
Its Clerk -Administrator
DEVELOPER:
By
Its
By
Its
Approved as to form and execution
this __ day of
19 :
City Attorney
-7-
f ,? EVEREST DEVELOPMENT, LTD. AND COMMERCIAL
PROPERTY INVESTMENTS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 87-81
EXHIBIT 2A
In addition to the foregoing conditions, the developer agrees to
the following:
1. Pay a park dedication fee of $175,000 to be paid as
follows:
$50,O00 by December 31, 1987 and,
$12,500 per year for the years 1988 through
1997 by December 31st of each year.
2. Obtain City approval of the final plat and provide _
evidence of recording of said plat at Ramsey County
prior to submitting building applications.
3. The Developer shall remove all billboards from the
P.U.D. by December 1, 1987, or as soon thereafter as
Developer may legally do so.
4. The Developer shall secure approval Zrom Rice Creek
Watershed District prior to awarding construction
i~
contracts.
5. All utilities shall be installed underground.
6. All public utilities shall be installed by
December 31, 1988. This includes the following:
a) Water
b) Sewer
c) Gas
d) Streets
e) Berm along south side of County H-2 including
landscapinq and sod
f) Signalize intersection at T.H. 10
g) Street lights:
(1) The Developer shall furnish and install
power to said street lights when Northern
States Power Company provides power to the
' area
h) Traffic control signs including stop signs, street
intersection name signs
i) Telephone
7. The Devloper shall have recorded at Ramsey County on the
deeds of the lots adjacent to the storm water holding
pond that maintenance of said pond shall be the
responsibility of the property owner. Evidence of
recording shall be submitted to the City. If said pond
-2-
is filled with debr's and the property owner has not '
removed said debris, the City Council may maintain said
pond and assess
30 calendartdaysce cost writtento the noticeptopthey
after giving .•:,`
property owner.
8. No building permits shall be issued until the plat
is approved and recorded by Ram9ey County.
9.
The Developer shall furnish a $1,CD0 security for 7
years to guarantee the pondie3 and control structures r
to be included in the Letter of Credit provided for in
for Private Redevelopment.
Section 4.5 of the Contract
10.
The developer shall install lot corners prior to
approval of the building permit.
11.
Developer shall install metal fences 6^4ts (minimum
to utility
7 - 1/2 feet long) at lot corners priot
construction.
'
12.
The Developer shall select street names and addresses
approval from the City and U.S.
for the lots and secure
Post Office prior to approval of the final plat.
13.
Preliminary or final occupancy permits for each phasa
l®
of the project shall not be issued until water,
sanitary sewer, storm sewer, concrete curb and gutter
such phase have been
and bituminous base to service
inbtalled the area of the project where the building
is located.
z
14.
Building signs and other signs shall meet City Code
requirements and .^' uniform throughout the P.U.D.
15.
City Code Chapter 40.24, Subd. B(4), requirements
--
shall be satisfied.
16.
All requirements of City Code Chapter 40.24 Subd.
B (8) through B (13), shall be satisfied.
17.
The Development Phase Plans of the P.U.D. shall meet
the approval of the Mounds View Fire Chief.
18, If the Developer acquires the single family house west
of McDonald's Restaurant, the property shall be
included in the planned unit development.
19. The Developer shall install plantings on the north side
of County Road H-2 in the area of the parking lot
exits to County Road H-2 in accordance with approved
P.U.D.'s landscaping plan.
0
-3-
20. The Developer shall carry storm water away from a
portion of County Road H-2 along that portion of
frontage owned by the Developer as approved by the City
Engineer.
21. No construction shall be permitted until a final
1011
Indirect Source Permit (ISP) is issued by Minnesotans
Pollution Control Agency. The Developer agrees to
MIE
comply with all of the requirements of the permit.
The Developer further agrees to submit to the Director
of the Division of Air Quality, Minnesota Pollution
Control Agency, the annual report required by Part III,
ti
.8 of the Permit on behalf of the City with a copy being
;
submitted to the City.
I
Date:
Date:
FOR THE CITY:
FOR THE DEVELOPER:
ATTACHMENT $1
EVEREST DEVELOPMENT, LTD.
PETITION FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS
1987
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
_
To the City Council of the City of Mounds View, Minnesota;
We, the undersigned owner(s) of percent of the benefitted
that said real property
property described below, hereby petition
be improved by street, curb and gutter, storm sewer, street
light(s), water and sanitary sewer and other public utilities
Municipal Code, Chapter 26, and approved
pursuant to Mounds View
plans.
Vie, the undersigned owner(s), also agree that should we deem it
the improvements once the
inappropriate to proceed with public
feasibility study or the plans and specifications have started,
be
that financial responsibility for funds expended will accepted
and paid by us.
^I
Description of property:
cr'
Signature if Owner:
-'
Everest Development, Ltd.
it is understood by the above signed owner(s) of 100 percent of
for improvements that
the benefitted property being petitioned
be assessed by a special assessment to the
said improvements will
above benefitting property owner(s).
Examined, checked, and found to be in proper form and to be
by making of the
signed by the owner(s) of the property affectd
improvement.
Donald F. Pauley
Clerk -Administrator
MOUNDS VIEW
RESOLUTION NO. 2273
RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE AND PUBLIC SALE OF $6,000,000
TAXABLE GE OF SERIES 1988A
THE CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW,VIEW,MINN SOTA
It is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Mounds View (the
"Issuer") as follows:
1. Findings Authorization.
1.1 it is hereby found and determined that It is necessary and expedient
to the sound financial management of the Issuer for the Issuer to issue its taxable
general obligation tax increment bonds in order to provide funds to pay public
redevelopment costs of a Development Project (the Project) established pursuant
to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.124 to 469.134, as amended.
i.2 The Issuer pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 273.71 through
273.78 has established Tax increment Redevelopment District No. 1 within. its
Development District No. 2 pursuant to a Tax Increment Financing Plan (the
"Plan") dated September 22, 1986. The Issuer is authorized by Minnesota Statutes,
Section 273.77 to (a) issue its general obligation bonds for the purpose of financing
pxnpnditures of the Authority incurred pursuant to Minnesota -Statutes, Section
273.75, subd. 4; and (b) to provide for the issuance v, 5� 6 w••�� ••• •••- •••—"
nPr
provided by, and subject to the limitations of, Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475.
2. Sale of Bonds.
2,t in order to provide funds to pay the public redevelopment m,s of the
Project in accordance with the Plar•, the Issuer shall issue its Taxable General
Obligation Tax increment Bonds, Series 1988A (the "Bonds") in the principal amotmt
of $6,000,000. Any excess of the purchase price of the Bonds over the sum of
$5,910,000 shall be credited to the debt service fund for the Bonds to pay interest
first due on the Bonds.
2.2 The Bonds shall be issued, sold and delivered in accordance with the
Official Terms of Bond Offering, attached hereto as Appendix A.
3. Award of BondsiAdvert[sement, @Ieeting.
3.1 The City Clerk -Administrator of the Issuer is authorized and directed
to cause advertisement for sealed bids for the purchase of the Bonds to be
published in the manner required by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475, and in any
additional publications as the City Clerk -Administrator may determine to be
suitable. Such advertisement for sealed bids shall be In substantially form attached
hereto as Appendix B.
3.2. Sealed bids for the Bonds will be opened by the City on Monday,
January 11, 1988, at 11:00 a.m., Central Time, at the off'^.es of Springsted
Incorporated, 85 East Seventh Place, Suite 100, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101-2143.
Consideration for award of the Bonds will be by the City Council at 7:00 p.m.,'
Central Time, of the same day.
(1)
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mounds View this 14th day of
December, 1987.
Offered by: Councilmember
Seconded by: Councilmember
Roll Call: Ayes:
Nays:
Absent:
Clerk -Administrator
(SEAL)
Mayor
J
APPENDIX B
OFFICIAL NOTICE OF SALE
TAXABLE GENERAL OBLIGATION TAX INCREMENT BONDS, SERM 1988A
C19R OF MOUNDS VDfW, MINNESOTA
Notice is hereby given that the City of Mounds View, Minnesota (the "City")
will receive sealed bids at the offices of Springsted Incorporated, 85 East Seventh
Place, Suite 100, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101-2143, on Monday, January 11, 1988,
until 11:00 a.m., Central Time, for the purchase of its $6,000,000 Taxable General
Obligation Tax Increment Bonds, Series 1988A (the "Bonds'). The bids will then be
opaned and recorded. The City Council will consider the award of the Bonds at
7:00 p.m., Central Time, of the same day.
The Bonds will be dated February 1, 1988, will bear interest payable on
February 1 and August 1 of each year, commencing August 1, 1988. The Bonds will
be Issued in Integral multiples of $5,000 as requested by the Purchaser, and will be
fully registered as to principal and Interest.
The Bonds will mature February 1 in the amounts and years as follows:
Year Amount Year Amount
1992 $ 25,000 1998 $500,000
1993 250,000 1999 575,000
1994 300,000 2000 650,000
1995 325,000 2001 750,000
1996 375,000 2002 850,000
1997 450,000 2003 950,000
Bonds dne o., or after February 1, 1°p7 will be subject to redemption, in
whole — in par! at nar plus acc.ued interes,, a! the city s option on February 1,
195;, and on any interest payment date thereafter. If less than all cf tl•4 Bonds are
redeemed, Bonds will be redeemed in inverse order of maturity and by lot within a
single maturity.
The City will furnish the approving legal opinion of Holmes h Graven,
Chartered, of Minneapolis, Minnesota. A copy of the legal opinion will be
reproduced on the printed Bonds. Copies of the detailed Official Terms of Offering
and adcitional information may be obtained from the City Clerk -Administrator or
from SPRINGS:ED, lncorporat;'; 85 East Seventh Place, Suite 100, St. Pau:,
Minnesota 55101-2143.
Dated: December 14, 1987
BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OFFICIAL TERMS OF OFFERING
$6,000,000
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW, MINPESOTA
TAXABLE GENERAL OBLIGATION TAX INCREMENT BONDS, SERIES 1988A
Sealed bids for the Bonds will be. opened by the C!ty on Monday, Jon -,cry 11, 1988, at 11:00 A.M.,
Central Time, at the offices of SPRINGSTED Incorporated, 85 East Seventh Place, Suite 100, Saint
Paul, Minnesota 55101-2143. Consideration for award of the Bonds will be by the City Council at
7.00 P.M., Central Time, of the some day.
DETAILS OF THE BONDS
The Bonds will be dated February 1, 1988, as the date of original issue, and will bear interest payable
on February I and August I of each year, commencing August I, 1988. Interest will be computed
upon the basis of a 360-day year of twelve 30-day months and will be rounded pursuant to rules of the _
MSRB, The Bonds will be issued in the denomination of $5,000 each, or in integral multiples thereof
as requested by the Purchaser, and fully registered as to principal and interest. Principal will be
payable at the main corporate office of the Registrar and interest an each Bond will be payable by
o th
theabooksrOft oppeois on
iThetRegisttrarras ofhe Registar 'Ithe ed tl5 heday lutf the caendarered nulder emonth reof tnext preceding his address as lthe interest
payment.
The Bonds will mature February I in the amounts and years as follows: .1
`500 000 1998 $850,000 2001
25,000 I992 375,000 1995 575,000 1,099 850,000 2002
250,000 1993 450 000 1996 1,50,000 2000950,C00 Z003
.300,000 1994 450,C00 1997
OPTIONAL REDEMPTION
The City may elect on February I, 1996, and on any interest payment date thereafter, to prepay
Bonds due on or after February I, 1997. Redemption may be in whole or in part of the Bonds subject
to prepayment. If redemption is in part, those Bonds remaining unpaid which have the latest maturity
date will be prepaid first. If only part of the Bonds having a common maturity date are called for
prepayment the specific Bonds to be prepaid will be chosen by !et by the Registrar. All prepayments
shall be at a price of par and accrued interest.
SECURITY AND PUP.POSE
The Bonds will be general obligations of the City for which the City will pledge its full faith and
credit and power to levy direct general ad valorem taxes. In addition the City will Pledge tax
increment revenues generated within the City's Tax Increment Redevelopment District No. I. The
proceeds will be used to finance eligible project costs within t' e City's Development District No. 2.
TAXABILITY OF INTEREST
The interest to be paid on the Bonds is includable in gross income of the recipient for the United
States and State of Minnesota income tax purposes, and is subject to Minnesota Corporate and bank
excise taxes measured by net income.
TYPE OF BID
t ,A sealed bid for not less than $5,910,000 and accrued interest on the total principal amount of the
Bonds sholi be fi!ed with the undersigned prior to the time set for the opening of bids. Also prior to
the time set for bid opening, a certified or cashier's check in the amount f $60,000, payable to the; '
order of ned or
Financial tAdvisor. sNolbid wihave llen filed with the beconsidered for which'said check phasnottbeen filed. eThe check of
the Purchaser will be retained by The City as liquidated damages in the event the Purchaser fails to
comply
with the accepted bid. The City will deposit the check of the Purchaser, the am bids unle s
will be deducted at settlement. No bid shall for considra withdrawn after the time set for opening
Bidders shall be in
the another dateowithout �taward e of scheduled
Bands having been thm des'Ra esuofferrned Ied re tharecessed,n
or continue o
integral multiples of 5/100 or 1/8 of 1%. No rate for any maturity shall be more than Blower than
.any prior rate. Bonds of the same maturity shall bear a single rate frarr. the date of the Bonds to the
date of maturity. AWARD
par, to the total
the Bonds will be awarded to the Bidder offering the lowest dollar interest cost to be determined by
the dedu;tic;, of the premium, !f any, from, or the addition of any amount less than p
dollar interest
the tthe
Snet do dollar pint rest cost of eachr date to ebid,ir �in laccordanlce withtcustomaryhpractice,
computation
will be controlling. bid or of matters
The City will reserve the right to: (i) waive non-substan(!I) informalities o any
(III)
determines to have failed to comply with the terms herein.
relating to the receipt of bids and sword of the Bonds, (ii) reject all bids without cause, an �
reject any bid which the City
REGISTRAR
The City will name the Registrar which shall be subject to applicable SEC regulations. The City will
pay for the services of the Registrar.
C1+:,1P NUMBERS
If tha Bonds qualify for assignment of CUSIP numbers such numbers with respect thereto wil
will be printed on the Bonds, u
uch numbers on any
Bond nor anv error refusal by the Purchaser to accept delivery of the Bonds. The CUSIP
neither the failure to print s
Service Bureau charge for the assignment of CUSIP identification numbers shall be paid by the
constitute cause for failure or
Purchaser.
SETTLEMENT
satisfactory to the City and the Purchaser. Delivery will be subject to
Within 40 days tollowing the date of their award, the Bonds will be delivered without cost to the
Purchaser at a place mutually approving tlegal opinion of Holmes & Graven, Charterestomary closing dof
receipt by the Purchaser of a" on g for the Bonds shall be made
Minneopc 'Minnesota, which opinion will be minted tt the Bonds, and of r the Bor s shall bee, not
including a no -litigation certificate. s the date ei settlement payment rent for the Bonds
to federal, or equivalent, funds which shalt be received at the offices r the City,
impossible Ti by action of the City, or its agents, the Purchaser shall he liable to
later than I:00 P.M., Central Time• Except as compliance with the terms o pay
shall have ben made suffered by the City the
of the Purchaser's non-compliance with said
the City for -any lossf
terms for pay
OFFICIAL STATEMENT
Underwriters may obtain a copy of the Official Statement by request till be with 50 copies
o the C!ty's Finance Advisor
prior the bid opening. The Purchaser we pof the Official Statement.
w
BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL
Dated December 14, 1987
/s/ Donald F. Pauley
Clerk -Administrator
I
w
RECOMMENL'ATIONS
FOR
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW, MINNESOTA
$6,00D,00D
TAXABLE GENERAL OBLIGATION TAX INCREMENT BONDS, SERIES 19MA
Study No. 3335
December 10, 1987
SPRINGSTED Incorporated
l�
SPRINGSTED
® d PUBLIC FINANCE ADVISORS
..� 85 East Sevenlh Place. Suite 100
( Samt Pa�1, Y-nnescla 5510L2141
6122233000
FAX 612-223.3002
December 10, 1987
Mayor Jerry Linke
Members, City Council
Mr. Donald H. Pouley, Clerk -Administrator
Mounds View City Hall
2401 Highway 10
S :int Paul, MN 55112
RE: Recommendations for the Issuance of $6,000,000 Taxable General Obligation
Tax Increment Bonds, Series 1988A
We respectfully request your consideration of our recommendations for the
issuance of these bards in accordance with the attached "Official Terms of
Offering." (Appendix III). Proceeds of the bond issue will be used to assist the
Everest Development, Ltd. project within the Mounds View Business Park. On
September 2?, 1986, the City adopted its Development District Nit. 2 plan and tax
increment financi plan, both relating to it:' project. All of the necessary
permits have been received and the terms of t;. contract with the developer have
been agreed upon so that the City is now at the point of being able to enter into
the contract for private redevelopment with the company for this project. The
terms of this contract for the redevelopment cal! for the development of the
oroject, consisting of three phases of construction. The first phase, to be
completed during 1988, consists -' a 121,320 square foot light industrial building
and a 58,000 square foot office/service building. The second phase, to be
completed in 1989, consist- :)f a 308,200 square foot light industrial building. The
third phase, to be completed in 1990, c,)nsists of o 69,000 square foot light
industrial building, a 52,800 office/service building, and a 6,000 square foot
restaurant.
The contract for private redevelopment calls for the City to issue its general
obligation bonds in on amount not to exceed $6:000,000. The composition of the
bond rssue includes the following:
Public Improvements
$1,426,532
Land Acquisitioti
2,622,468
Capitalized Interest (estimated)
1,6511,000
Bond Discount
90,000
City Administrative and Costs of Issuance
210,00
Total Bond Issue $6,000,000
Note: The Public Improvements portion will be adjusted to reflect actucl costs and
available monies, including investment earnings from bond proceeds.
Indiana Office VAscons:n CfLce.
251 Noon Ilbno,s Street. Sucre 1510 500 Elm Grove Read. Sane 101
Indanapobs, Ind.'Ina 46204.19.2 Elm Grove, w,consn 53122.0037
317231.3636 414-782.8222
Fax 311-237,3639 Fax 41-782-2904
City of Mounds View, Minnesota
Ncernber 10, 1987
The bonds are general obligations of the City pledging its full faith and credit and
unlimited taxing powers to the repayment of the bonds. The purpose nf the general
obligation pledge is to lend to the bonds the credit rating of the City, which assures
the investor that the bonds will be repaid. This results in the lowest available
interest rates for the bonds. To protect the City, the redevelopment contract
requires specific assurances and guarantees from the developer that the tax
increment revenues pledged to the repayment of the bonds will be adequate to
cover all debt service. The City has undertaken four separate methods of obtaining
security to assure that the bonds will be paid from the project. These include:
Assessment agreement.
The assessment agreement is between the City of Mounds View, Everest
Development, Ltd., and the Ramsey County Assessor. The assessment
agreement states that, as of January I in each of the years 1989 through
1991, the developer will construct minimum improvements at a value not
less than the amount shown in the development contract. The assessor
aarees that upon, substantial completion of the construction, as defined in
the redevelopment contract, the assessor will place a minimum market
value on the property, which will be maintained as the minimum value of
that property until all the bonds are repaid. This assure:: that there will be
sufficient value to the property to generate the projected tax increments.
It does not guarantee the increment, since there is no certainty as to future
mill rates.
2. Release of funds.
The City will not release any dollars from the bond issue to the developer
until a certificate of completion has been certified for each of the phases.
In other words, the developer will "front-end" the w slsiof each
phase
reimbursetheuntil the work is completed, at which time the Ci'y
developer for eligible project costs out of the bond proceeds. This will take
place upon completion of each of the phases. This assures the City that the
work will be completed and the buildings are on the tax roils before bond
proceeds are released. In other words, either the City will have cash to pay
the bonds or there will be taxable value sufficient to generate the necessary
increments, assuming no dramatic reduction of property tax rates, or major
change in property tax administration.
3. Developer guarantee and letter of : • t.
The developer guarantees the payment of any shortfall of tax increment
which is insufficient to pay the debt service on the bonds. This pledge is
uncondit`.onal. To add additional the developer w;ll provide the
City a Guaranteed Letter of Credit to assure sufficient tax increment
income in the years 4, 5, and 6 in an amount sufficient to guarantee the
payment of all debt service.
4. Reserve fund.
If excess tax increment is generated because of higher values within the tax
increment district or because of higher mill rates than are contemplated,
Page 2
City of Mounds View, Minnesota
December 10, 1987
those excess debtr1
ll be service if needed or to to create a debt service reserve
fund to help pay ay to prepay bonds if sufficient funds
are available.
There is no absolute guarantee that the City will never have to levy a tax to pay
debt service. ations of the City,
if all of the
guarantees prove insufficient, e bonds he City eral is ultimately responsible fordthe repayment
of the bongs. The security measures sfken on b, and mithe nimize thehowever
possibil ty of comparison
City
to mast other municipalities, y 9,
support.
In September, 1986, the City formed the tax iThe find financing district whicas
h
will generate the revenues to repay these bonds. The financing district qualifies he
a "redevelopment district" within the Statutes, which permits the life of the
ty has selted a
maturet ithint15 years of 1ssuonce, so thlat the District can bet havingicy of bonds
to exeno for ears. The closed out early and
the property put back on the general tax rolls. Appendix I is our projection of the
reven.:s which will be received by the Di"lict from tax increments created by the
phases of
construction
beginni g in 1990, e
le OISO assumes
inflation will he values by 2%u
that,each year. The
ill rote of 110
issue wi,ich
is the approximate m ll�rate .4r properties llwil
schedule also assumes a thin the City for t xescollected in
1987. No adjustment has been made to these numbers, and no attempt has I: 'n
reflect changes in the
fmadeormulaathat he State hassde ellopedtforttaxespay ble n1989valuation
try to alter
and beyond. It is
our understanding that those changes will alter the assessed y
ssed valuati ntaxes paid is
upward and
the mill rates 4ownward, but generally the overall level of property
expected to be the some.
The first phase of development, shown in Column 5, is for work to be completed
duringe new
be
the
rolls as
January1288989,hfor taxes wt. thhsbuildings
9. Te value of will be leviedied n the llfall ofn1981 for collection i
collect on n
1990. The final phase will be construction completed during 1991, with the value
completion of the threerphases,,9t1heforede redevelopment contracr taxes to be tand�thelgassessm92. ent
ti
Colue ne 10 reflects rthe incrementalinimum increaseincomebthat�swill beadevluat elopedion of
$ffom8,8h4s
valuation, plus the projected inflation of
valuation
over the life of the bonds. This
is the income that will be used to repay
s.
he
Appendix II is the projected cash
l Column 10e sealsoservice
shown as Columns 10 of
income generated in Appendix ' the City will not begin collecting incremental
Appendix II. As discussed previously.
income until the year 1990. There will be interest payments due o e the bonds
during the time when no incremental income will se received. In order to assure
that no tax levies will be required to pay the debt service, there is included in the
bond issue $1,651,000 of capitalized interest which will be set aside to pay the
interest on the bonds until the incremental income bands will be August I, 1is is
shown in Column 7. The first interest pay he bo nt w due A February 1,
and semiannually thereafter. The first principal pay
1992, after completion ip l ayment phase
can befmadetbeginning Once the
3. third Asstaated
is in place, major principal payments
Page 3
City of Mounds View, Minnesota
December 10, 1997
previously, the third phase of construction will be completed in 1990 and placed on
the tax rolls as of January I, 1991. The first collection of taxes will be made in
1992, which will be available to pay the August I interest payment in 1992 c. : ti.e
February I principal and interest payment in 1993. This levy cycle continues
through the term of ?he bonds.
Column 4 is our projection of interest rates for this bond issue. The interest rates
are taxable rates, since the use of the bond proceeds will be for p,rvate activity,
and because the City receives g-::...-.iees from the developer for the repayment of
the bonds. Taxable bonds became a necessity with the Tax Reform Act of 1986,
which severely restricts the use of tax-exempt bond issues to finance the costs of
private activities. The taxable bond market is not well established, and therefore
it is difficult to project accurately what interest rates may be received on the
bonds. Most taxable bond Issues have been relatively small in size and do not
present a very solid basis for making projections. To our knowledge, the $6,000,000
of taxable general obligation bonds will be the largest taxable issue sold in
Minnesota to date. We anticipate or. excellent reception to the bond issue;
however, we are still uncertain as to what interest rate levels will be required for
the bonds. Our projections are based upon interest rates received for smaller
issues and we are comfortable that actual rates received will not be greater than
our estimate unless the overall market deteriorates between now and the sale date.
Minnesota Statutes require the City to provide for debt service in an amo6ol equal
to but not less than 105% of actual principal and interest cost. The reason for this /
is to protect the bondholder and the City in the event the taxes are not received irr
the full amount as projected. This may result in a surplus of revenues if 100% of
the taxes are collected as projected. The surplus can be used to prepay bonds at
some future date. The debt service at 105% is shown in Column 9. Column 10, as
stated previously, is the projected incremental income. Columns II and 12
represent the surplus of revenues over debt service.
The bond issue provides for bonds maturing in the years 1997 through 2003 to be
callable as early as February 1, 1996 without penalty. This represents $4,725,000,
or approximately 79% of the bond issue. This is an extremely aggressive call
provision, but it is necessary in order to protect the City in the event that the
income stream is more rapid than projected, creating surpluses which may not be
able to be invested at rates as high as the interest rates on the bonds. Also, if
income does not materialize as pruected, the City needs the opportunity to be able
to refinance the debt at an early date. Any call provision earlier than what we are
recommending may negatively affect the interest rates and the bidding on the
bonds.
Since the bonds are a general obligation pledge of the City, a Moody's rating will
again be required for the issue. The City has not been reviewed b7 Moody's for
several years, however, it has continued to retain its "A" rating. The $6,000,000 of
new debt wil! be of significant concern to Moody's; however, at this moment we de
not think it will detract from the current rating. We will continue to keep staff
informed as we discuss this in more detail with Moody's.
We are recommending the bonds be offered for sale on Monday, January II, with
bids to be received in the offices of Springsted Incorporated at 11:00 A.M. A
representative of the City will be required to attend the sale. The bids will be
rw�,
Page 4
City of Mounds View, Minnesota
December 10, 1987
tabulated and. verified for accuracy and then presented to the Council for
consideration of award at the regular meeting that evening. The reason for the
daytime sale is to attract the most aggressive bidding from underwriters; also, if a
problem arises, it can be solved during normal working hours, prior to action being
required by the Council that evening. Proceeds will be available to the City
shortly after February I.
Respectfully submitted,
SPRINGSTED Incorporated
dah
Page 5
APPENDIX I
Prepared December 8, 1981 `-'•
City of Mounds View. NlnnesoG
Everest Development Ltd. TIF By SPRINGSTED Incorporated
Valuation Inflated 8 2%
Calculation of
Tax Incr-rnt Revenues
Everest
Development
Ltd.
.......................................'--"---....__......_........._._........_...----.__.....
Ineligible
Increment
Increment
Total
Hill
Prglected
Year
Tax
Year of
Assessed
Valuation
Due to
Due to
Cumulative
Rate
Hill
of
increment
Valuation
VeC z
increasc
Inflation Construction
Increment
Year
Rate
Coll.
Revenue
(I)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
W
(10),
1988
2,S80,065
0
0
2,322.930
2,322,930
1989
110.000
1990
255.522
1989
6,279.211
0
0
3,699,14E
6,022.076
1990
110.000
1991
662,428
1990
8,501,613
0
125,584
2.096,818
8,244,478
1931
110.000
1-
1991
11,671.645
0
17D.032
0
8,414.510
1992
110.000
!993
925,596
1992
8,845.078
0
373,433
0
8,587.943
1993
110.000
1994
944,674
1993
9,021.980
0
176.902
0
8,764,845
1994
110.000
1995
964,133
1994
9,202,420
0
180,440
0
8,945.285
1995
110.000
1996
983,951
1995
9.386.468
0
184.048
0
9,129,333
1996
110.000
1997
1.004,227-
1996
9,574,197
0
187.729
0
9,317,062
1997
110.000
1998
1-024,877
1997
9.765.681
0
191.484
0
9,508,546
1998
- 110.000
1999
1.045,940
1991
91960,995
0
195,314
0
9,703.860
I999
110.000
2000
1,067,425
1999
10,160.215
0
199.220
0
9,903,080
2000
110.000
2001
1.089,339
2000
10,363.419
0
203.204
0
10,106,284
2001
1:O.000
2002
1.111.691
TOTALS:
0
2,621.714
8,118.694
11,986.726
Assumptions:
Valuation Inflator: 2.00%
First year applied: 090
Hill rate Inflator: 0.00%
First year applied: 2000
,I
7
U
Page 6
APPENDIX II
I'
City of Mounds View. Minnesota
`• S6,CiZ,000 Taxtble G.O. Tax Increment Bonds
Everest DealOpsen..td.
Prepared Oeceaber 8, 1987_
By SPRIMGSTED Incorporated _
Dated: 2- 1.1988
mature: 2- 1
Total Capital- mat Tax
Principal teed Levy 305% Increment
Year of Year of
Levy mat. Principal Rates Interest 8 Interest Interest Required of Total Income
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (a) (9) 110)
U 0 C
1981 1989 0 O.00X 620,500 620,500 625.000 000 0 0 0
1986 1990 0 0,00% 620.500 620,500 <a5,000 219.500 230,175 255,522
IS89 1991 0 0.00% 620.500 620,500
,
- 1990 1997. 25,000 9.25% 620,500 665.SC0 0 868.189 9I1, 591 0 645.500 677,775 906906,893
893
1991 1993 250.000 9.50% 618.183 d68,188 0 894./38 939.167 925,506
1992 1994 300.000 9.65% 59/,438 894,43: 0 690.408 935.012 944.674
. 1993 1995 325,000 9.80% 565-488 890,488 0 908.638 954.070 964.133
)4 1996 375,000 10.00% 533,638 908.638 0 908.638 954.070 983.981
1995 1997 450,000 10.10% 495.138 S46.138 0 946,135 993,445 1.004,227
1996 1998 500.000 10.25% 4SO.688 950.688 0 950,688 :.998.222 1.02/,877
1997 1999 575.000 10.25% 399.438 74.438 0 974,438 1.023,160 1,045,940
1998 2000 650,000 10.50% 340,500 990.500 0 1, 022,250 1.040.025 1,C51,425
1999 2001 750,000 10.50% 193.500 1.043,500 0 1.043.500 1,095.675 1.089,339
2000 2002 850,060 10.75% 197.500 l,Od',500 0 1,052,125 1,104,731 1,111.591
2001 2003 950,000 10.75% 102,•. L0' .IZS
TOTALS: 6.000,000 1,048.391 13,048,391 1.651.000 11.406.391 11,976,710 11,916,725
Bond Years: 61.500.00 Annual Interest: 7.048391
Avg. Maturity: 11.25 Plus Discount: 7,138.391 90,000
Avg, Annual Rate: 10.442% Met Interest:
%.:.C. P.:tc: 10.57q%
Interest rates are estimates; changes may cause significant alterations of this schedule.
The actual underwriter's discount bid mey also vary.
Annual Cim l&tive
Surplus Soirlus
llU (12)
4,560 4,500
4.S00 9,000.
25,041 34,047 --'
0 I8,700 --'
0 13.996
9.662 - 30, OBI
10,063 20.157--''-
'.0 10,693
1.717 18,415
5,915 24330 7,1
0 18:392
0- 12.056 7
6,610- 19,016
Page 7
APPENDIX III
OFFICIAL TERMS OF OFFERING
$6r000,0DO
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW, MINNESOTA
TAXABLE GENERAL OBLIGATION TAX INCREMENT BONDS, SERIES 1988A
Sealed bids for the Bonds will be opened by the City on Monday, January II, 1988, at 11%00 A.M.,
Central Time, at the offices of SPRINGSTED Incorporated, 85 East Seventh Place, Suite 100, Saint
Paul, Minnesota 55101-2143. Consideration for award )f the Bonds will be by the City Council at
7.00 P.M., Central Time, of the some day.
DETAILS OF THE BONDS
The Bonds will La dated February I, 1988, as the date of original issue, and will bear interest payable
on February I and August I of each year, commencing August I, 1988. Interest will be computed
upon the basis of a 360-day year of twelve 30-day months and will be rounded pursuant to rules of the
MSRB. The Bonds will be issued in the denomination of 95,000 each, or in integroi multiples thereof
as requested by the Purchaser, and fully registered as to principal and interest. Principal will be
payable at the main corporate office of the Reg;atrar and interest on each Bond will be payable by
check or draft of the Registrar mailed to the registered holder thereof at his address as it appears on
the books of the Registrar as of the 15th day of the calendar month next preceding the interest
payment.
The Bonds will mature February I in the amounts and years as follows:
1 25,000 1992 $$325,000 1995 16500000
500,000 1998 000
250,000 1993 375,000 19% 575,000 1999 18750
50:000
300,000 1994 1450,000 1997 2000 950,000
OPTIONAL REDEMPTION
2001
200i
200
The City may elect on February I, 1996, and on any interest payn.ent date thereafter, to prepay
Bonds due on or after February I, 1997. Redemption may be in whole or in part of the Bonds subject
to prepayment. If redemption is in part, those Bonds remaining unpaid which have the latest maturity
date will be prepaid first. If only part of the Ponds having a commas maturity date are called for
prepay :, .nt the specific Bonds to be prepaid will be chosen by lot by the Registrar. All prepayments
shall be at a price of par and occnied interest.
SECURITY AND PURPOSE
The Bonds will be general obligations of the City for which the City will pledge its full faith and
credit and power to levy direct general ad valorem taxes. In addition the City will pledg_ tax
increment revenues aenerated within the City's Tax Increment Redevpinnment District No. 1. The
proceeds will be used to finance eligible project costs within the City's Development District No. 2.
TAXABILITY OF INTEREST
The interest to be paid on the Bonds is includable in gross income of the recipient for the United
States and State of Minnesota income tax purposes, and is subject to Minnesota Corporate and bank
excise taxes measured by net income.
TYPE OF BID ¢g �
A sealed bid for not less than $5,910,000 and accrued interest on the total principal amount of t&d
Bonds shall be filed with the undersigned prior to the time set for the opening of bids. Also prior to
Page 8
` the time set for bid opening, a certified or cashier's check in the amount of $60,000, payable to the
order of the City, shall have been filed with the undersigned or Springsted Incorporated, the City's
,.Financial Advisor. No bid will be considered for which said check has not been filed. The check of
he Purchaser will be retained by the City as liquidated damages in the event the Purchaser fails to
comply with the accepted bid. The City will deposit the check of the Purchaser, the amount of which
will be deducted at settlement. No bid shall be witharawn af;er the time set for opening bids unless
the meeting of the City scheduled for consideration of the bids is adjourned, recessed, or continued to
another date without award of the Bonds having been made. Rates offered by Bidders shall be in
integral multiples of 5/100 or 1/8 of 1%. No rate for any maturity shall be more than 1% lower Chun
any prior rate. Bonds of the some maturity shall bear a single rate from the dote of the Bonds to the
date of maturity.
AWARD
The Bonds will be awarded to the Bidder offering the lowest dollar interest cost to be determined by
the deduction of the premium, if any, from, or the addition of any amount less than par, to the total
dollar interest on the Bonds from their date to their final scheduled maturity. The City's
computation of the total net dollar interest cost of each bid, in accordance with customary practice,
will be controlling.
The City will reserve the right to: 0) waive non -substantive informalities of any bid or of matters
r
reiating to the receipt of bids and award of the Bonds, (ii) reject all yids without cause, and,vn:::',,
reject any bid which the City determines to have failed to comply with the terms herein.
REGISTRAR
The City will name the Registrar which shall be subject to applicuble SEC regulations. The City will
pay for the services of the Registrar.
CUSIP NUMBERS
lef the Bands qualify for assignment of CUSIP numbers such numbers will be printed on the dcnds, but
neither the failure to print such numbers on any Bond nor any error with respect thereto will
constitute cause for failure or refusal by the Purchaser to accept delivery of the Bonds. The CUSIP
Service Bureau charge for the assignment of CUSIP identification numbers shall be paid by the
Purchaser.
r
SETTLEMENT
Within 40 days following the date of their award, the Bonds will be delivered without crst to the
Purchaser at a place mutually satisfactory to the City and the Purch-sor. Delivcry will be subject to
receipt by the Purchaser of an approving legal opinion of Holmes & Graven, Chartered of
Minneapolis, Minnesota, which opinion will be printed on the Bonds, and of customary closing papers,
including a'no-litigation certificate. On the date of settlement payment for the Bonds shall be made
in federal, or equivalent, funds which shall be received at the offices of the City, or Its designee, not
later than 1:00 P.M., Central Time. Except as compliance with the terms of payment for the Bonds
shall have been made impossible by action of the City, or its agents, the Purchaser shall be liable to
the City for any loss suffered by the City by reason of the Purchaser's non-compliance with said
terms for payment.
OFFICIAL STATEMENT
Underwriters may obtain a copy of the Official Statement by request to the City's Financial Advisor
prior to the bid opening. The Purchaser wiil be provided with 50 copies of the Official Statement.
Dated December 14, 1987 BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL
/s/ Donald F. Pouley
Clerk -Administrator
Page 9
MEMO TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIIIL�T�/�/,/���
FROM: CLERK -ADMINISTRATOR' \/
DATE: DECEMBER 9, 1987
SUBJECT: GREENFIELD ESTATES
As requested the following is a listing of the exact steps
that should be followed by the City Council should it be
your desire to deny the original preliminary plat for
Greenfield Estates.
1. The first motion should be to deny the wetlands
alteration permit on the following grounds,
a. The Corps of Engineers has rescinded their
original permit for this plat.
b. The plat does not accurately reflect the wet-
lands boundaries as determined by our -
consultants and the Corps of Engineers.
c. The wetland, after development, would not
meet the phosphorcus stripping requirement
of the wetlands ordinance, specifically 48.06,
Subdivision ?, A, 2.
d. The lot size and frontage for the development
does not meet the minimum lot size and frontage
requirements of Chapter 48, specifically 48.05,
Subdivision 5, A and B.
2. After denying the wetlands alteration permit the
approval of the preliminary plat of the subdivision
should be denied.
Should you have any questions regarding this matter, prior
to or during the Council meeting, please let me know.
DFP/mjs
MEMO T0: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
^ FROM: CLERK -ADMINISTRATOR
DATE: DECEMBER 9, 1987
SUBJECT: GREENFIELD ESTATES
Attached please find a memorandum from Chairman Bill Downing
of the Ramsey County Soil and Conservation District
regarding a presentation made to them by Mr. Sabri Ayaz on
November 16, 1987. At this presentation Mr. Ayaz used
edited portions of Mounds View City Council video tapes
where Jim Senden stated that the District had approved the
Greenfield Estates development.
Mr. Downing indicates in his letter that at no time did the
District approve the development. It should be pointed out
that at no time d,d City staff indicate that the development
had been approved by the District but did point out that the
wetland had been reviewed by s_ I members of the District
as has been our past practice.
It would appear that Mr. Downing's letter simply clarifies
the position of the District and in no way changes the facts
as they exist and as they were known by the City prior to
Mr. Ayaz's meeting with them on the 16th of November.
DFP/mjs
Attachment:
RAMSEY SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
MINNESOTA
SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICTS
December 7., 19B7
To: Don Pauley, City of Mounds Vicw Administrator
SUBJECT: Greenfield Estates Development
Town and Cawnhy Bank
IB77 Norsk Sant W It
r
At its November !6, 1987 meeting, the Ramscy District Board
reviewed a video tape prepared by Mr. Sabri Ayaz of 7751 Bona
Road, Mounds View, MN. This video was a romposite of several
public meetings in which the Greenfield Estates Development was.
discussed. Our Board, having viewed this tape, believes that we
have been misrepresented by the developer's spokesman, Mr.
Senden. We wish Lo set the record straight. To dote. the
District Board has not received an official request by the City
of Mounds View to comment on the proposed development. We,
therefore, have never taken -i position on this issue. our staff
rep^-ts, hcwever, that several requests have been made by City
personnel to review Lite many renditions of wetland boundaries
associated with the development LayouL.
If it would be helpful to the City, a representative of the
District Board would be happy to meet with City staff and/or
Council to clear up this issue. Please contact us if we can be
of any assistance.
Sincerely,
Billk Downing, •chairman �
BD: lit
cc: Sabri Ayaz
Commissioner Duane W. McCarty
C
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
.®use
RESOLUTION NO. 2268
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING BUDGET TRANSFERS FOR 1987
SALARY ADJUSTMENTS
WHEREAS, Resolution No. 2172 established 1987 salaries
for non -union personnel; and
WHEREAS, Resolution NO. 2211 was adopted to bring the
City's compensation program into conformance with the
Comparable Worth Act of 1984; and
WHEREAS, the 1987 General Fund Budget provided for
salary adjustments for non -union personnel;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of
the City of Mounds View that the budget transf.;rs for the 1987
General Fund, Water Fund and Sewer Fund Budgets be hereby
authorized:
GENERAL FUND
FROM
1987
Budget
100-120-4970 Salary Adjustments 59,187
100-120 Administration
4010 Salaries
4030 Pensions
4050 Workers Como.
100-150 Finance
4010 Salaries
4030 Pensions
4050 Workers Comp.
100-180 Public Works
4010 Salaries
4030 Pensions
4050 Workers Comp.
100-190 City Hall
4010 Salaries
4030 Pensions
4050 Workers Comp.
1987
Ammend- lmmended
ments Budget
(44,978) 14,209
TO
40,932
6,671
4,666
767
150
24
65,384
10,175
7.454
11170
240
37
73,670
4,360
7,273
501
2,402
142
13,000
3,453
1,482
40
52
14
47,603
5,433
174
75,559
8,624
277
78,030
7,774
2,544
16,453
1,522
66
RESOLUTION N0. 2268
PAGE TWO OF THREE
1987
1987
Ammend-
Ammended
gudoet
ments
Budget
100-200 Police
435,295
22,905
458,200
4010 salaries
4,500
180
4,680
_.
4011 Overtime
53,110
2,788
55,898
4030 Pensions
23,4Q5
1,233
24,728
4050 Workers Comp.
-
100-230 Civil Defense
22,711
1,430
24,141
'-
4010 Salaries
2,589
164
2,753
rra
4030 Pensions
83
5
gg
4050 Workers Comp.
100-260 Maintenance Garage
2a;53G
732
25,268
4010 Salaries
405
24
429
4011 Overtime
2,832
87
2,919
4030 Pensions
1,237
38
1,275
4050 Workers Comp.
-
yJ1
100-270 Streets
24,488
730
25,218
4010 Salaries
1,156
39
1,195
4011 Overtime
2 918
gg
3,006
4030 Pensions
a20
28
948
`s
4050 Workers Comp.
-
100-350 Recreation
89,797
(12,501)
77,296
3
4010 Salaries
10,602
( 1,438)
9,164
*•
4030 Pensions
4,924
( 685)
4,239
4050 Workers Comp,
100-360 Pat''rs
48,880
1,456
50,336
4010 Salaries
1,763
52
1,815
4011 Overtime
5,885
173
6,058
4030 Pensions
3,211
96
3,307
4050 Workers Comp.
TOTAL GENERAL FUND
982,042
44,978
1,027,020
WATER FUND
FROM
100-121-4910 Contingency
15,000
( 5,185)
9;81.5
f
TO
700-120 Water Administration
3C,254
3,028
35,282
4010 Salaries
3,597
337
3,934
4030 Pensions
927
87
1,014
4050 Workers Comp.
C
RESOLUTION NO. 2268
PAGE THREE, OF THREE
700-121 Water Operations
4010 Salaries
4011 Overtime
4030 Persions
4050 V7orl-ers Comp.
TOTAL WATER FUND
730-121-4910 Contingency
1987
Budget
48,976
1,156
5,820
2,074
94,804
SEWER FUND
FROM
15,000
TO
730-120 Sewer Administration
32,25:
4010
Salaries
3,596
4030
Pension
g26
4050
Workers Comp.
730-121 Sewer Operations
49,120
4010
Salaries
1,156
40i1
Overtime
5,789
4030
Pensions
5,449
4050
Workers Comp.
TOTAL SEWER FUND
98,290
1987
Ammend-
Ammende6
ments-
Budget
1,460
50,436
39
1,195
172
5,992
62
2,136
5,185 99,989
(5,289) 9,711
3,028
35,282
337
3,933
67
1,013
1,466
50,386
39
1,195
169
5,958
163
5,612
5,289 103,579
TOTAL ALL FUNDS 1,175,136 55,452 1,230,588
Adopted this 14th day of December, 1987.
ATTEST:
Jerome W. Lin e, Mayor
(SEAL) Donald F. Pauley, Clerk -Administrator
Jam/'" //� •,:.,
RESOLUTION NO. 2269
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION APPROVING EXTENSION CF A CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT FOR KUNZ OIL COMPANY, 2901 HIGHWAY 10
WHEREAS, Kunz Oil Company has petitioned for an extension
of its conditional use permit at 2901 Highway 10 in the City of
Mounds View; and
WHEREAS, Staff and Planning Commission have reviewed the
redevelopment proposal and recommend approval; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the issue of
landscaping for the redevelopment of the Kunz gas station; and ;
WHEREAS, Kunz Oil Company has submitted drawings and
applied for a building permit thus showing intent to carry out
the project; and
WHEREAS, the project is in conformance with all with all
applicable Municipal Codes.
NOW, THEREFORE, GE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View
City Council approves a conditional use permit extension valid
for one year from the date of approval.
Adopted this 14th day of December, 1987.
ATTEST:
Mayor
4
(SEAL)
Clerk -Administrator
,.r, (q
ORDINANCE NO. 431
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
AMENDING THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF MOUNDS VIEW BY AMENDING
CHAPTER 40 ENTITLED, "'ZONING"
The Council of the City of Mounds View does hereby
ordain:
SECTION I. Chapter 40.02, Rules and Definitions,
Subd. B, is amended by adding the following:
(24) Delicatessen.
An establishment which serves prepared food such
as cooked meats, sandwiches, or salads or other
food items which do not require kitchen facilities
for preparation with the exception of conventional
and microwave ovens. The majority of the business
would be as carry -out with the maximum amount of
seating allowed on premises being 24 seats.
SECTION II. This ordinance shall take effect thirt•
(30) days after the date of its publication.
Read by the Council of the City of Mounds View on cais
day of 1987.
Passed by the Council of the City of Mounds View this
day of 1987.
ATTEST:
(SEAL)
Mayor
C er -Adman strator
NEWSLETTER
December 14, 1987 City of Mounds View Volume VII Number.18
MOUNDS VIEW BUSINESS PARK PROPERTY CONDEMNATION
As a result of the unwillingness to Meets. Wasta and
Underdahl to accept the City's offering price for purchase
of their lands needed to complete the Mounds View Business
Park, City Attorney Richard Meyers has commenced condemna-
tion proceedings against Mr. Waste and Associate City
Attorney Karney on Mr. Underdahl's property. It is our hope
that the City will able to accomplish acquisition of
these properties through a quick take process that will
allow our acquisition to the title of this property at the
earliest possible date.
COUNTY ROAD I RECONSTRUCTION
As you know, the basic work for the reconstruction of County
Road I has been completed for this construction season. The
traffic signal at Quincy and I will be operational in the
very near future and the storm water pond and control
structures are being completed at this time.
Cl Installation of signage including stop signs, speed limit
signs, and traffic control signs are being installed at this
time by the County. It is our hope that the temporary
asphalt surface will withstand the winter weather wear and
we will not. experience any significant traffic problems
along this section of road during the winter of 1988.
Work is scheduled to recommence at the earliest �ossible
date in the spring of 1988 beginning with the finishing of
paying.
POL_TCE CONTRACT NEGOTIATIONS
Negotiations have commenced with T9amsters Local No. 320
representing the Mounds View Police Department patrol
officers pursuant to direction approved by the City Council
at a recent Executive Session. ThE first negotiations were
construction in nature and it is the hope of Police Chief
Ramacher and myself that these negotiations will quickly
progress to a settlement. '
CIVIL DEFENSE SIRENS
The radio activation equipment installed on the Mounds View
Civil Defense Sirens has been tested on a daily basis for
the last thirty days and been determined to be fully
operational and satisfactory pursuant to the performance
standards outlined in the specifications for the equipment.
Approval of final payment for th, =quipment will be
requested of the City Cou..cil at cembec 28th meeting.
ADMINISTRATIVE NEWSLETTER
PAGE TWO
DECEMBER 14, 1987
RAMSEY COUNTY CONSORTIUM OF MUNICIPALITIES
The Ramsey County Consortium of municipalities organized in
the late 1970's to provide several suburban Ramsey County _
municipalities with computer services was recently dissolved
by the remaining members of the organization, namely White
Bear Lake and Mounds View. The dissolution of this
organization was determined to be appropriate due to the
fact that Mounds View no longer requires the services of the
consortium and the only organization currently using the
consortium, White Bear Lake, will be discontinuing use of -
the Ramsey County computer system within the next year. The
City of Mounds View will have no further financial obliga-
tions related to the consortium and has agreed to the
storage of all consortium records for the next five years
should access to these records be required by any of the
members for financial or other purposes.
STREETLIGHT REPAIRS
On numerous occassions you have pointed out to me that
streetlights are in need of repair throughout the City of
Mounds View. I have been advised by Police Chief Ramacher
that off;,.nr mirhaej Kampa has been assigned the duty to
maintain a record of all non -operating streetlights in the
City and turn over to City Receptionist Carol Rasmussen on a
regular basis a list of non -working lights. At that time
Carol calls NSP with this list and requests the repairs be
accomplished at the earliest possible date. Should you wish t
to report any non -operating lights you may do so by either
contacting Carol Rasmussen or calling NSP at 221-4411.
CALENDAR
December 14 7:00 p.m. Council Meeting
December 15 9:00 a.m. Dept. Head Mtg.
10:00 a.m. Del Jones
December 15 pIPY.I.INE SAFETY ADVISORY COUNCIL
December 18 1:00 p.m Norm Vinnes
December 21 7:00 p.m. Agenda Session
December 22 9:00 a.m. Dept. Head Mtg.
December 24 NOON City Offices
Closed for
Christmas Holiday
December 25 CHRISTMAS DAY HOLIDAY
4 ' MEMO TO: Clerk -Administrator
FROM: City Planner Herman
DATE: November 2, 1987
SUBJECT: COMMUNITY SURVEY
Various communities within Ramsey and Hennepin Counties have in
the past or are currently conducting community surveys. The
information gathered from these surveys is o
upon the questions asked. All communities f course dependent
interviewed stressed
questionnaire the importance rrking with the consultants to develop the
use. so thaof wot the survey fulfills the City's intended
The following is a list of firms that have been used by cities or
agencies we have contacted. All firms were highly recommended
for their sensitivity statistical analysis oto the community's needs and for their
f data:
1• Colle MCVoy Advertising Agencv, Inc.
7900 International Drive
Bloomington, eiiv
851-2500
2• Norma Fredricks
920 Butler Square
Minneapolis, MN 55403
333-5385
3. Anderson, Neibuhr Associates, Inc.
1885 University Avenue
St. Paul, MN
645-5577
4, Decision Fesources, Ltd.
3128 Dean Court
Minneapolis, MN
920-0337
5, MN Center for Survey Research
University of Minnesota
2122 Riverside Avenue
Minneapolis, MN 55454-1320
627-4282
While these firm names were stated, there was consensus that many
consumer marketing firms would be able ® Mounds View is interested in. to do the type of work
Questions still to bA resolved are:
What type of survey is the City interest in?
The original intent was for the survey to be conducted by
phone which generally attains a higher response rate. But the
Minnesota Social Research Center is in L:,e process of
conducting a mail survey for the City of White Bear Lake which
received a 71% response rate. This survey was a random
sample, within 4% degrae of accuracy and developed a large
enough sample to analyze the data both by City ward and total
City. The benefits to a mail survey in general is the cost
which is usually cheaper than either a phone survey or door to
door survey. The firm of Anderson, Neibuhr Associates,
conducted both a phone and mail survey. Residents of the
community ^f St. Louis Park received a mail survey whila a
phone survey was used to interview the local businesses.
-c ;nfnrmation would the City like to be
While the actual questions to be included in the survey will
be decitled later, it •.-iould be good to have a general idea of
the types of questions the City wants tc ask its residents.
Are we only interested in the home owners of the community or
do we wish to survey the renters and businesses located in
Mounds View? Do we want to ask all three groups — homeowners,
renters and businesses, the same questions?
Some communities tried to discern what were the strengths and
weaknesses in providing and distributing City services. Other
cities concentrated on the possible expansion of services
dependent upon the residents willingness to pay. Still other
surveys targeted a few key issues that had arisen within the
community. A generalized idea of the scope of the survey will
be needed to accurately portray the city's needs when
developing the RFP.
Based upon comments received by 6he City Council at the November
16 agenda session, Staff proposes to develop an RFP to send out
to listed companies.
RJH/bac
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA SESSION
DECEMBER 21, 1987
7:OO,P.M.
1. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding Purchase of
Two Police Vehicles
Reardin
2, Consideration OdasaNewton�r8319mGrov9
of
elandRoad dfor
o�al
Use
Oversized Accessory Building
3, Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding Minor
Subdivision for Alphonse Petron, 2909 Woodale
4, Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding Recycling
Program for City of Mounds View
Regarding Wetlands
:,ideration of Staff Memorandum Reg Hers Proposal
5, Inv Dynamic Designers Investigation as Relat
ed to y
g. Consideration of Sta,�i Memorandum Regarding Public !corks
Callout
7, Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding Meeting with
Mounds View School Boaru
g, Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding Metropolitan
Airports Commission 1988-89 Capital Improvements Program
g, Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding Ordinance
434 Amending Chapter 1 Entitled, "General Provisions of
Code"
10. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding Budget
Transfer Request
PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL I* f .
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA f/
Regular Meeting
December 14, 1987
Mounds View City Hall
2401 Hwy. 10, Mounds View, MN 55112
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Mounds View City Council was called to order by 1. Call to
Mayor Linke at 7:04 PM on Monday, December 14, 1987. Order
The Pledge of Allegiance was said. 2. Pledge of
Allegiance
MEMBERS PRESENT: Councilmembers Blanchard, Wuori, 3. Roll Call
Quick and Mayor Links.
It was noted Councilmember Hankner was absent on
vacation.
ALSO PRESENT: City Attorney Meyers and Clerk/
Administrator Pauley
Mary Bradley, of the Pinewood School. Playground
4. Presentation _
"Buy
Committee, updated the Council on the progress they
of -A -
have made in the design and beginning fund-raising
Board" Program.
for the playground at Pinewood, and she introduced
by Pinewood
three student representatives from the children's
School Play-'''
Committe
committee. Ms. Bradley presented a sketch of the
ground
planned playground which had been received from
and Considera-,
the architect and she invited the Mounds View Park
tion of Rslt.
and Rec Commission to make any suggestions they
No. 2271
might have to the Committee.
Ms. Bradley stated they are recruiting volunteers
at this time, and have 85 percent of the required
number so far. She explained the .ralue of the
playground will be $120,000 to $140,000 when it is
completed, and they hope to cut up to 2/3rds of the
cost by usi,.g v^'-+y^.te" labor, and they hope that
donated materials will reduce the cost even more.
-
Ms. Bradley and the student representatives
reviewed the fund raising ideas that have been
approved so far, and they presented the Council
with a penny jug, which will be left on the counter
at City Hall.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley read proposed Resolution
No. 2271.
Mounds View y Council I! December 14,
Page Two
Reular MeetingURI
"j1 ED
-------------------------------------
Motion/Second: Wuori/Quick to approve Resolution
No. 2271, supporting the efforts of the Pinewood
School Playground Committee.
4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Clerk/Administrator Pauley read three amendments 5. Approval of
Councilmember Hankner had asked be made to the Minutes:
minutes of November 23. November 23,
1987
Motion/Second: Blanchard/Quick to approve the
November 23, 1987 minutes as amended.
4 ayes 0 nays
:lotion Carried
Pat Rickaby, 8343 Groveland Road, read a list of
6. Residents
comments and concerns regarding the drainage ditch
Requests and
that was cleaned in the area of the proposed Harstad
Comments from
development, and asked whether a cost benefit study
the Floor
had been done prior to that work. She also asked
if anything had been done to find the file of comments
from the Planning Commission regarding sections of the
City Code to be worked on, which had been left with
Steve Thatcher when he worked for tha pity, but hadnot
been located since he had left.
�i-;-•
Mayor Linke explained the dit ,_in question is the
final outlet that serves 200 acres of the drainage
basin, and if the ditch was filled, there would be
massive drainage problems in the area. He added that
the Rice Creek Watershed District had agreed the
ditch needed to be cleaned, and it was difficult to
determine a cost benefit, and if it was not cleaned,
what that damage cost would b3. He stated he felt
the sum spent to clean the ditch was small and
helped the whole drainage area.
Mayor Linke stated that the Council had not heard
about the missing documents, but he added that in
any business documents do get lost, and the City
has implemented policies to have better control
over documents at City Hall. He added it is time
to let bygones be bygones.
Steve Thatcher stated that when he left, the files
on comprehensive land use and rezoning were left
in both the left and right drawers of his desk.
Mayor Linke noted there has been a four to five month
period betwoen Mr. Thatcher's employment with the
City and the hiring of Ms. Herman, and that many
people were in that office during the interim.
Mounds View City Council
Regular Meeting
-------------------------
Clerk/Administrator Pauley read the items on the
proposed consent agenda.
Motion/Second: Wuori/Blanchard to approve the
consent agenda, as presented, and waive the reading
of the r=solutions.
4 ayes 0-nays
Clerk/Administrator Pauley presented an overhead
a
projection of the proposed project, and he gave
brief history of the negotiations the City had been
doing with the developer over the preceeding two
years. He added that everything is in order now
and outlined the steps for the Council to follow to
approve the project:
Motion/Second: Quick/Wuori to approve the contract
for private redevelopment for the Mounds View
Business Park.
4 ayes C nu; s
Motion/Second: Blanchard/quick to approve
no.,atnnment Agreement No. 57-81, for the Mounds View
Business Park.
4 ayes 0 nays
Motion/Second: Wuori/Quick to approve Resolution
No. 2273, providing the issuance and public sale of
$6,000,000 taxable general obligation tax increment
bonds, Series 1988A, of the City of Mounds View,
Minnesota, and waive the reading.
4 ayes 0 nays
motion/second: n/Second: Quick/B1anYOJentstable
theconsideration
View
of the bids for public imp
Business Park to January 11, 1987.
4 ayes 0 nays
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported Councilmember
Hankner had requested that a statement be read into
the minutes, in her absence, regarding the wetlands
lat for Greenfield
alteration permit and preliminary p
Estates, and he read the statement:
"Although I am not able to be in attendance, 1 want
it noted in the minutes that I would vote "no" on the
Greenfield Estates project. After much study and
review by Barr Engineering I have been presented with
information or evidence that indicates that the
December 14, 1987
Page Three
7. Approval of
Consent
Agenda
Motion Carried
8. Consideration.
of Final
Actions on
Mounds View
Business Park
Motion Carried
lotion Carried
Motion Carried
Motion Carried
9. Consideration
of iletland
Alteration
Permit and
Preliminary
Plat for
Greenfield
Estates
l'-- - �December 14,
1987
Mounds View City Council UNAi i & page Four
Regular Meeting --------------------------------------
----••---------------------------
proposal. is not in compliance with the City's
the wetland is
Wetland ordinance. The boundary of
the developer's plat. of great
not accurate on
concern to me is the fact that the Army
importance and
Corp of Engineers permit has been rescinded. Given
these concerns and other questions raisedapproveyBarr,this
Council can possibly
don't think that the
proposal -as it is before us today. I urge other
"no"."
members of this Council to vote
Jim Senden, representing the Harstad Company on the
the histpry of the
Greenfield Estates project, reviewed
stating they have granted
project over the past year,
vember 16,
City extensions twiceesentedand taaverbalt on oreport
the
the City's consultant p--
the Harstad Company
regarding the project and requesting
and make changes to the
to do additional studies
preliminary plat. He stated this was done, as
and was
requested, at a cost to the Harstad Company,
December 4. lie further
presented to the City on
December 7, the Council considered the
stated that on
revised documents and decided additional time was
time, Barr
needed to study the changes, and at that
report, and the Council
Engineering presented a partial.
Harstad Company agreed, that more time
felt then, and
to study some of the changes.
was needed
Mr. Senden stated they acknowledge that some of the
madein the
changes were necessary due to some errors
he requested
original calculations, and
time for the City to consider the new
extension of
stating that it should be presented and
the
material,
fully considered before any action is taken on
matter.
Mr. Senden reviewed some of the changes that had been
the ditch on the
made, and he discussed the impact of
they do not need an outlet or ditch
property, stating City an
ey
for cleaned.
accessleasementpsonthatuthehditchdcouldwbehe
Mr. Senden explained that one of the items Barr had
requested be don(! was to have the area
�estaked, which was ane,aof thethe
devalopment
restaking, it was decided some of the boundries
which would
would have to be moved in some areas,
He reviewed those changes
then change the layou,.
made, due to both the recon-
that were subsequently
figuration and to meet requests of the area residents.
A and B
He stated they are still proposing outlots
their variance request.
be deeded to the City to offset
F ,
Mounds View City Council J
Regular Meeting__________ i Ap
Mr. Senden stated one of the items Barr had requests
additional information on was the phosphorous stripping
capacity of the wetland.
Steve Thatcher, of Merrill and Associates, presented
the Council with a report detailing the phosphorous
production and phosphorous stripping capacity of the
wetland, and he made a lengthy presentation of the
data in the report.
Mr. Senden stated that in view of the extensive data
they have presented, they would like the City to
submit it to Barr Engineering for their analysis,
and he added they would also like Barr to submit a
full report, in writing, as was asked for by the
Council originally. He stated that when Harstad Company
had agreed to the two extensions, it was with the
understanding that Barr would be lcoking into the
concerns expressed by the citizens and Staff, and
they would now like an opportunity to review Barr's
findings, and have the benefit of an independent
consultants review. Mr. Senden requested the Council
review aA consider the new data, all the changes the
developer has made so far, and the Barr Engineering
report, before making any decision. He added he would
also like additional time to study the Barr report,
as well as their responses to what Harstad Company
has done to meet their requests. Mr.. Senden asked
for a 30 day extension of time, as a period during
which Staff and the consultants could review the
additional infer «ation.
Mayor Linke clarified the second extension was asked
for so that the Council could add-ess the project and
take action at a regular meeting, which would be
cable cast, and have minutes taken. He also stated
that while Harstad Company has said they would give
wetland in exchange for the requested variance,
Chapter 48.05, Subd. 4 states the developer is
required to give an easement, and he read from the
Chapter.
Mr. Senden explained they would give a warrantee deed
rather than an easement.
Mayor Linke stated that while Mr. Senden has requested
a 30 day time extension, the Council would need closer
to 60 to 90 days to review all the new information,
considering the upcoming holidays and schedule. He
added there is a great deal of data to review, and
the plan has changed considerably over what was
originally presented.
December 14, 1987
Page Five
Mounds View City Council
Regular Meeting
r% Dec U� 4Y�rY �i_H �i_ SJ - "agemb�X-14,-1987
Councilmember Blanchard stated she was very opposed
to another extension, as they have told the citizens
that a decision would be made this evening on the
preliminary plat. She further stated she agreed with
Mayor Linke that a 30 day extension was not enough
time to review all the new data submitted, and she
charges made. She added that Barr Engineering was very
rushed to do their initial report in 45 days.
Councilmembers Quick and Wuori stated they both agreed
with the comments made by Mayor Linke and Councilmember
Blanchard.
Council.member Blanchard asked Mr. Senden if the Army
Corps of Engineers had rescinded their approval.
Mr. Senden replied they had, however, they should be
able to grant a new approval within 20 days. He also
pointed out to the Council that very few preliminary
plats are submitted that do not change a great deal,
and that it is a working process to get everything
in order. He also pointed out the final plat can
change. Mr. Senden stated that Barr Engineering has
all the data, so it should not take them long to submit
their findings in writing.
mayor Links pointed out the preliminary plat has
changed considerably and would requiie time to look
at all the changes.
Mr. Sender stated Barr is familiar with the new plat,
and most of the changes were based on recommendations
they had made. He added there is no reason to cut
this off before everything has been reviewed.
Jim Sandidge, 7817 Bona Road, stated none of the
citizens have had an opportunity to review the changes
made, and he recommended the developer submit a com-
pletely new proposal. He emphasized how this proposed
development will impact where they live, and the City
itself, and he read a letter received by Mr. Ayaz from
the Ramsey Soil and Water Conservation District, stating
they believe they have been misrepresented by the
developer, and they have never taken a position or
given an approval to this development.
Mr. Senden explained their contact with the Ramsey
Soil and Water Conservation District had been on -site,
where they agreed to the staking of the boundries by
the Corps of Engineering, and nothing had been submitted
to them as their approval was not reglired.
r'
Mayor Linke read a memo from Clerk/Administrator Pauley V
to the Council, dated December 9, regarding the letter
from the Ramsey County Soil and Water Conservation
District.
Mounds View City Council - ,_, ,. December 14, 1987
Regular Meeting y �tl� 1�. �. 4 j;, ,,' r .�`, Page Seven
--------------- i�Ij 4i g e it _U : - ---------------------
^Councilmember Blanchard reiterated that she feels
there have been substantial changes made to the plat.
Mr. Senden asked that the Council be aware the
development must take place in winter, when the ground
is frozen, and if they are required to start over with
the Planning Commission, they will miss a full season
of development, and it would be a substantial hardship
for the developer, and would deny him the right to
develop his property. He pointed out they have
responded to all the City's requests, and have spent
a good deal of money doing so, and any changes made
have actually enhanced their proposal. He stated the
Council owes it to the developer to consider what
they have done, especially since the Council asked
them to do it.
Mayor Linke explained there are certain things that
cannot be done within the wetland ordinance, and it
is up to the Council to decide if what the developer
plans on doing goes along with the ordinance, and in
order to do that, they have asked for assistance from
an outside consultant. He added he can understand
the time constraints, but the Council does not want to
be hasty or make any bad decisions just for the sake
of expediency. He stated there have been major changes,
and while many were suggested by Staff or the consultant,
they must still take the time to review them and make
sure they meet the Code.
Motion/Second: Blanchard/Wuori to deny the preliminary
plat and wetlands alteration permit for Greenfield
Estates, based upon the following grounds, that the
Corps of Engineers has rescinded their original permit
for the plat, that the plat does not accurately reflect
the wetlands boundaries as determined by the consultants
and the Corps of Engineers, that the wetland, after
development, would not meet the phosphorous stripping
reauiremeat of the wetlands ordinance, specifically
48.06, Subl.. 3,A,2, and the .lot size and frontage for
the development does not meet the minimum lot size and
frontage requirements of Chapter 48, specifically 48.05,
Subdi. 5, A and B. Also, the proposed amendment of the
plat, as submitted by the developer, is in the opinion
of the Council, to have substantial changes in the plat
because the number of lots have changed, the wetland
boundaries have been altered, and the addition or change
in the size and location of the holding ponds.
4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
VEOilecember
14, 1987
Mounds View City Council
Regular Meeting
---------------------------------------------------.`
Page Eight
g
----------------
Councilmember Wuori stated that due to the substantial
changes that had been made to the preliminary plat,
to back to square one.
felt it was a much simpler way go
information is very technical, and the
She added the
Council is not engineers, and they need to call on
experts for their opinion.
Mayor Linke stated the Council is not denying the use
and a
of the land, but they are caught between a rock
look at the
hard spot, and they need to start over and
that when it is presented again,
new information, so
everything should go through smoother and faster, and
the ordinance requirements will be met.
Councilmember Quick stated he agreed with the comments
Linke, and he
made by Councilmember Wuori and Mayor
deny the prelimir
felt the Council must yplattonight
and allow the developer to come back with
proposal.
Motion/Second: Quick/Blanchard to remove this item
10. Remove from
Table and
from the table.
Consideratin
of Sewer and
4 ayes 0 nays
Water Coac-
tors Li.c 3-It
for Schul ea;
Plumbing
Motion Carried
Mayor Linke explained this item was removed from the
was
consent agenda at the November 23 meeting, and
discussed at the last agenda session.
Motion/Second: Quick/Blanchard to deny the sewer and
water contractors license renewal for Schulties
Plumbing.
Motion Failed
2 ayes 2 naps
Councilmember Wuori and Mayor Linke voted against the
motion.
City attorney Meyers advised that as the motion dial
it had failed, and if a
not have a majority vote,
was to be granted, that motion would
license renewal
also need a majority vote.
Councilmember Quick stated he had had previous
experience with this contractor, which was very
feel he should be allowed
negative, and he does not
to do business in the City.
Mayor Linke noted no other .omplaints have been received
December 14, 1987
Mounds View City Council g� Page Nine
Regular Meeting ��q tav�-pOed
-- ------------
Mayor Links stated no other complaints ha den
at City Hall regarding Schulties Plumbing.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported the Better Business
Bureau did not have a record of complaints on file
either.
Councilmember Wuori stated it is very important for
citizens to let City Hall and the Better Business
Bureau know when there is a problem with contractors,
as that input will be considered in granting licenses.
Motion/Second: Linke/Wuori to grant a license to
Schulties Plumbing for sewer and water contracting,
Motion Carried
3 ayes 1 nay
Councilmember Quick voted against the motion.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reviewed proposed Resolu-; 11. Approval of
tion No. 2268, which would authorize the budget Resolution
es 2268
transfer for 1987 salary adiustments, explained it
was necessitated by Comparable Worth, and this
resolution would be formal action to bring the books
into balance.
Motion/Second: Quick/Wuori to approve Resolution
No. 2268, authorizing budget transfers for 1987
salary adjustments, and waive the reading. ,
Motion Carried`
4 ayes 0 nays
Mayor Linke,ptated it is about time the City finishes
,Comparable I-7orth, and now tnat the City is in
compliance, everything should go smoothly -
Planner Herman reported Kunz Oil Company received a 12. Approval of
conditional use permit in 1985 for redevelopment Resolution
of their property at 2901 Highway 10, and the time No. 2269
has run out for that permit, so they have requested
an extension. She explained they appeared before
the Planning Commission to request a one year
extension, and they have made changes to their plan,
mainly in up:rading the landscaping, and the Planning
Commission recommends approval of a one year
extension. She noted that and Staff re
the proposed
complies with the zoning code
commends
approval.
Councilmember Wuori clarified that the sign will be
on a pole, and not mounted above the canopy, as shown
it_ tse picture presented. The representative from
Kunz Oil Company assured the Council the signs would
be on poles, and the pictures were merely to show
what the signs would look like.
Mounds View City Council p pr r n
Regular Meeting
--------------------------- UI V 'VE-D--
Motion/Second: Blanchard/Wuori to approve Resolution
No. 2269, approving the extension of a conditional
use permit for Kunz Oil Company, 2
and waive the reading. 901 Highway 10
i
4 ayes 0 nays
Mayor Links noted the removal of the 6' fence and
additional landscaping and the addition of a 4' fenc-
is a much better plan.
Councilmember Quick stated he was also happy with the
changes in the plan.
Clerk/Adcinistrator Paulev explained the remaining
sections of pipeline which were removed after the
explosion on Long Lake Road in July of 1986 have been
returned to the City, and are being kept by Twin City
Testing, who has requested the City enter into an
agreement to rent storage space at a cost of $240 per
month. He stated Attorney Meyers has reviewed the
agreement and found it acceptable. He also noted
sectionsltoethe PubliceWorksagarboxes oOf Pipeline
read that is
y and secure, sometime after the first of the
year.
Motio^ r�/SE�on Quick/Blanchard to approve the agree-
ment between-Twin
n Cityi Testing and the City of Mounds
View for storage of
Per month. Pipe sections at a cost of $290
4 ayes 0 nays
in
Clerk/Administrator Pauley stated the pipe is evidence
and tit he is citylscseagainst
Williams Pipeline Company,
imperativey keep it secure.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley explained the purpose of
the proposed ordinance is to include the difference
in the zoning code between a delicatessen and
restaurant.
Attorney Meyers advised a 4/5ths vote of the entire
Council haveto vote eine£avor oflthe uordinance ineorder `�told
pass it.
MoMotio�econd: Quick/Wuori to have tha second reading
and adoption of ordinance No. 431, amending the
municipal code of Mounds View by amending Chapter 40
entitled "Zoning", and waive the reading.
December 14, 1987
Page Ten
Motion
13. Approval of
Agreement
Between Twin
City Testing
and City of
Mounds -view
for Storage of-1
Pipe Sections ==:
Motion Carried
14. Second Reading
and Adoption
of Ordinance
No, 431
December 14, 1987
Mounds View City Council 1 {^� } �p D!a
Regular Meeting ,f , �_'L4
ge Eleven
---------------------1.J
Councilmember Blanchard - aye
Councilmember Wuori - aye
Councilmember Quick aye
Motion Carried
Mayor Linke - aye
Councilmember Quick stated he feels the ordinaneof
having fast food types
provides control over not
the shopping center.
operations in
Pa, reported that some items
lby
15. Approve Change
Orders to
clerk/Administrator
at
on the Public Works garava addition thoinWeto beldone
were now g 9
Public Works
Garage Addn.
planned to be done by Staff
due to time constraints o£ Staf and
the contractor,
the limited ability of Staff to do the work, and he
amounting to
requested council approval of change orders
the door going into the
$3,245 for the installation of
the filling tanks.
locker room, and
Motion nd Quick/Blanchard to approve the change
addition c act in
ge
orders to the Public Woerstherrecommendation°ofrthe
$3,245, p
the amount of
architect dated November 25, 1987.
Carried
Motion
4 ayes 0 nays
_
reported the acquisition of certain
16. Report of
Attorney
Attorney Meyers
right-of-ways relative
a°quickView takeBoflthes
in
Park, and they would 4
would necessitate a
Robert Waste property, which
the court of the approved value of the
deposit with
He asked tae Council tO authorize
right-of-way.
Treasure r to make a check payable to
the Mayor and
the Clerk of District Court, in the -amount of
He added that after
$76,900, for the right-of-way.
procedures
riatethe
the deposit is mad,and thell become
followed, the property
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reviewed the case of the
Underdahl, which
acquisition of property from Russ
Mark stated
is being handled by Attorney
debating the app raisedyvalue ofthe
Mr. Underdahl is the
property, which is $20,000. The fuunda�foprojects
special.
acquisition would come from the
fund, and would be returned, with
after the tax increment financing haslostbeenecompleted.
developer had tried
He explained both the City and
t. owners
atoraice
n agreementwith
ttablegtolcomeate
but wereenoly
Attornev Meyers reviewed how the interest would be
deposited with the Court
-, disbersed on the funds
and he clarified that the interest would go to the
owners of the property.
Mounds View City Council ; . •-: ,-.., ,-T, ..m
Regular Meeting------------Wl��f
December 14, 1987
-------------- -
-II
--Page-Tweive
------------
a ad
Mayor Links explained why the two pieces of property were
r
needed for the Mounds View Business Park.
Motion/Second: Quick/Wuori to approve the payment of
$96,900 to the Clark of District Court for the quick
take on the Robert Waste and Russ Underdahl properties.
4 ayes 0 nays
Motion Carried
Councilmember Blanchard reported she had verbally
17. Reports of
stated at the last agenda session that the residents
Councilmemberai
of Scotland Green had requested a loading zone in front
Councilmember
of the apartment buildings, and they have since sent
Blanchard
a letter of request.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley stated he would lcok into
it.
Councilmember Wuori had no report.
Councilmember-;;
Wuori
Councilmember Quick had no report.
Councilmember,
Quick
Mayor Linke reported that no work will occur at the
Mayor Linker _
Mounds View Business Park after 7 PM on the end of
the property closest to the residents on County Road
H2, but that they will be working late on the south
end of the site.
Mayor Linke asked Clerk/Administrator Pauley to
contact the contractor regarding getting the large
white truck moved from Bona and County Road I, as it
is visually blocking the intersection.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley replied he had asked that
it be done last Friday, and '-q will call them again.
Mayor Linkc inquired why Channel 16 was off the sir
over the weekend.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley explained they had head
end difficulties, and the equipment at City Hall
was in full operation, but the problems were outside
their control.
Mayor Linke stated that the broadcast of this evenings
meeting had had difficulties, but the meeting was
fully taped and would be rebroadcast, and anyone
interested in the time could call City Hall tomorrow
for the time.
Mounds View City Council G
Regular Meeting ��"
-------b�ir-----" _
------------------ T W uu d gp�
Mayor Line stated that Barr Engineering gave a�ver�T
report to the Council on December 7, but some of the
items covered were not included in the written report
provided later, and he would like to get everything
in writing from them, to use when the Council looks
at the resubmission on Greenfield Estates.
Mayor Linke stated the penny jug for Pinewood would
be at City Hall, and he encouraged people to buy
boards for the playground.
Bill Frits, 8072 Long Lake Road, stated the fence
which —as moved from around the holding pond at the
west end of County Road 1, by the shopping center,
had not been put back into place, and he was concerned
with children being able to get in and get on the ice.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley stated he would check into
it and make sure the fence was put back in place.
Clerk/P.dministrator Pauley had no report.
Mayor Linke adjourned the meeting at 9:47 PM.
Respectfully submitted,
Donald F. Pauley
Clerk/Administrator
December 141 1987 -
Page Thirteen----
18. Report of
Clerk/
Administrator
19. Adjournment
Eilk V
Please read this statement and add to the minutes.
Although I am not able to be in attendance I want it
noted in the minutes that I would vote "no" on the
Greenfield Estates project. After much study and revic'r of
by Barr Engineering I have been presented with information
or evidence that indicates that the proposal is not in
compliance with the citiy's Wetland Ordinance. The boundary
of the wetland is not accurate on the developer's plat.
Of great importance to me and concern to me is the fact that
the Army Corp of Engineers permit has been rescinded.
Given these cuncerns and other questions raised by Harr
don't think that the council can possibly approve this
proposal. I urge other membeD of this council to vote "no".
v I-!*—
AtIVI-1I
TO: Mayor, City Council and Cler-Administrator
FROM: Police Chief
DATE: December 17, 1987
RE: PURCHASE OF TWO POLICE VEHICLES
This year our Police Department participated with other Ramsey County
municipalities and the Ramsey County Sheriff Department in the bid
process for the purchase of new police vehicles.
Bid number A-6256-4 was awarded to Thane Hawkins Polar Chevrolet
on December 16, 1987. The award on this bid is for a 1988 full size
Chevrolet Caprice with a 350 CID - V8 engine. With the selection
of various options, the purchase price is $11,157.00 per vehicle.
This purchase price is more than $500.00 rhea er than last year.
As you know, we budget for.one and one half ($20,670) police vehicles
per year. This year we are scheduled to purchase two vehicles.
RECOMMENDATION: Request authorization from the City Council to
purchase two (2) 1988 Chevrolets from Thana Hawkins
Polar Chevrolet in the amount of $22,314.00.
BUYER: CAROLYN BOLEN
FFRffi amuR f@7IMIDB C3. Ing
88OIDI
IZ1m10C4EDOl 119CI F>DaR S8L1
4z-m tII-BWO 463-7.
L 7740E 9=B1IIQ. SBSE& E SILa1. SO,DI.
EI®Dcw S[9®ORVilfd Kr GR Far BUD
TA69LATIOH OF 510 M MER A6256-4 - SPECIFICATION N9. 1
POLICE VEHICLES -
POLICE DEPT., RAMSEY CO. SHERIFF VARIOUS MUNICIPALITIES
DID OPENING DATE: DECEMBER 9. 19;7
WD•I IOT1Rm, m QO®BDNO= ECw-ar
aC>?E� 71B amA64a, 302IB 5.&VVID=
Miff
71E6YD.(EDESL9 7/70 Rana
-
UM=PIEIAR'
11QrAmm xFnm
IF CRM
9D-ID Ims 9oi2Q ODS
90In
EER KMW RM
Car 13-M]Sine
um
CPME
u
L SPAR xm NN EO6®EID
)m PER UNIT
m.m
SlL6
2.00 W'JWM WP C70P
Kamomams
INS ECIRDB
3. 00'dM" tlmm N4E16
aaxvIDODD
Lffi'"m O.II
y179.E
5'.693
/. III=XG77, a=
imta=ERDDT
SM80
min
5. a amc w I=a9ICII.m
FOm a17DmE
IE PnRaw
SM.W
Ssm
S. ERCEP13 Smwm
CMR
Imum RE Od1'
SM20
S1MOO
R1 7.%MET
7m FEROW'
$M75
SM75
IL WEB ENME EEMK IEEmB
OtIA'1FR Qm'
a7.00
S16.W
9. CEf17t 711T �N@2.SOO.
ISZILT FIR *a
S219.90
5D7/.90
IL Im" Jam MEN IO75
camnROafl'
M75
6161.75
It PROD A. PRO O®
W.m
moo
B. SINU OCR
m.W
moo
StB KOS Fat
BEmC
9pEZMD�
IVB'V7
J
101EE7L71D-9W
KiOLL 79®
IRS
Him EP RW OEBBm Rmcm vrmm: DDB![5557C Eta 7R A06-7D ICPRAWEEZ
AIMA 121 AP, TnEs REEL R: t IODS IQf"m
lD 4 EEL
I� COD
D7YE !IC
TA. EBRIS
IR
6N
]50 CASn
1Dm
9,-=ow
12
C 0715 W
lK T n
191BemEmaD
u
31
L
SIBm
Sum
6Am
I
1
AW
S.m
$3W
0 5
SW
SS195.Em
S
.
>50&
$
(SO.m1
(SIW.0
mco
=00
G1Lm
SI&m
SN.D
1It
MIX!
$MOD
SILL
SILLm
=0!
XCO
=00
SDP.m
STS7.
moo
L®.m
15.W
0.W
616.m
SD.
WD
$C7.m
MOD
S1tbm
= 0
mm.zj
moo
51111.m
n: Bw I m, 5. I9m
Nlm
D90r=
9s
Q9.W
S1LLE
(SXM
snm
bDO.W
Saco
em.W
Satin
LL9100
MOD
51l.m
a
(71
MEMO TO: Clerk -Administrator Pauley
FROM: City Planner Herman
DATE: December 17, 1987
SUBJECT: ODAS NEWTON, 8319 GROVELAND ROAD
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
Mr. Odas Newton has requested a jitional use permit for an
oversized accessory building which he is currently using as his
attached garage. He propose-, tc :unvert his garage to storaec
use only and build a new garage on the other side of his
property. The new garage will allow him to expand its capacity
and will shorten his driveway substantially.
The Planning Commission and Staff have reviewed the proposal and
found it to conform to City Code. Because of the unusual
circumstances the conditions placed upon the property have been
changed somewhat from the standard conditions for accessory
buildings. The two changes are as follows:
1. No driving surface shall be allowed to the building. The
existing driveway will be seeded for removal.
2. The accessory use must be maintained to provide a uniform
appearance with the dwelling unit.
These are written to ensure that the attached garage will be
transformed into an accessory structure rather than look like a
garage. I
KJH/bac
RESOLUTION NO. 2276
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COoNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO
CONSTRUCT ACCESSORY BUILDING, 8319 GROVELAND ROAD,
ODAS NEWTON, PLANNING CASE NO. 229-87
WHEREAS, Mr. Odas Newton, 8319 Groveland Road, has
requested a conditional use permit to allow for conversion of a
240 square foot garayP :..) a storage building; and
WHEREAS, Mounds View Municipal Code, Chapter 40.10,
Subdivision C(2)(c), prov:des that the maximum size of an
accessory building in an R-1 District shall be 216 square feet
unless a conditional use permit is awarded by the City; and
WHEREAS, Mounds View Municipal Code, Chapter 40.10,
Subdivision D(6) A through E, provides an accessory building may
be permitted up to 400 square feet when said building is a
permanent structure and is designed and maintained to provide a
uniform appearance with the principal dwelling unit; and
WHEREAS, the Mounds View Planning Commission has reviewed
the applicant's request for a conditional use permit and
determines that it is in conformance with the aforementioned
conditions. ?t
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Mounds view approves of a conditional use permit to
allow for conversion of a 240 square foot accessory building by
Odas Newton, 8319 Groveland Road, legally known as Lot 5, Block
1, Gustafson's 1st Addition and in said Auditor's Subdivision
No. 89 the north 95.07 feet (subject to road and easements) of
Lot 68, ramsey County, Minnesota, contingent upon the following:
1. The use of the building shall be limited to storage of
domestic supply and non-commercial r;creational
equipment as provided for in Municipal Code Chapter
43.10, Subdivision C(2).
2. No driving surface shall be allowed to the building.
The existing driveway will be seeded for removal.
3. Any vehicle stored in the building must be licensed
with the Minnesota Department of Transportation as a
collector or vintage vehicle.
4. The accessory use must be maintained to provide a
` uniform appearance with the dwelling unit.
RESOLUTION NO. 2276
PAGE TWO OF TWO
ATTEST:
(SEAL)
5. The conditional use permit shall be filed with Ramsey
County for recording on the title of the subject
property.
Adopted this 28th day of December, 1987.
Mayor
Clerk -Administrator '
M
M
MEMO TO: Clerk -Administrator and City Council
FROM: City Planner Herman
DATE: December 17, 1987
SUBJECT: ALPHONSE PETRON MINOR SUBDIVISION L
2909 WOODALE DRIVE
Mr. Petron proposes to subdivide his lot. Originally the
proposal required a variance because the newly created lot would
only be 9,100 square feet; the Zoning Code requires 11,000 square
feet. The Planning Commission could find no hardship, other than
economic, to grant the variance. Mr. Petron instead submitted a
revised proposal which looks much like the one attached.
The proposal is that Mr. Petron will subdivide his property so
that no variance in regard to lot size or lot frontage is
required. Because of the placement of his garage and the unusual
shape of the lots, his driveway will have to be moved on to his
own property. The resolution places this condition upon the
subdivision along with the receipt of a certifieu site plan and
legal description. The description is to ensure that the lot
line is describable in written form so that County will accept
the subdivision.
The Planning Commission has recommended approval of this proposal Js
per Resolution No. 208-87.
aY'
KJH/bac
r., r i,:=y;: w ;i•,• -\f�q: 'r'.•:'T1t�'. :Y� .. J: Y-. .r. S' °r.^..:`'<:•',T::: KY:n:
. � i t , l 'a , , • F� l•.
45 '�My�t tji^ jiU" lti ,r -G eft ll4r �!t
n�Ir LL. J;l le! y I' A.N<f� J" � ,. j I\T/, (•• 1 �i,
�t'.i'• ��i et.i 9t �t Qltt �Ih llVe�&E'., )`..`i.. 1 ; 1 .: r, t 1r I!ri�.K a1':
�S&I6j &AK • CENTRE MN 6617a r i b7 CLOUD ►AN 66&Olf ,ll I r • % 'gip • r r i ♦ ♦ p
1•b. iA • 7.76 ,.n.a.,t it... -I.." �. E1Y,152.7661 �'-.'stir �1e•ts'
t•rL 4�Yi � hT, . I.t/T tot <. t i 5>• � [. j+., � Y 1 � 9 ,�t.?f>F
\ t �j .: f ASBOCIaiE yM1 fu/ �'SG`tY.
i • n. J $ a - r Ciu[M4�IgAan .• Su[70
,
a , It tY�:r.-..;•,eI„<, t..f a.}.o ti.9wur[.w anu ..••SG41du[ . ., r i. A^tl..
" ��t' r j�:T : jam° rrS �'p k:i •..7 �Jh51• :'• .. ':4..b:::Sr;�{•;Y'7fj �!
yw
� r ; l , ,i i ' + t t � ) G'r' w l �.3.}�,/ � 66 1ij` F�{1L, MN 65117 614•{94i]01 Df'1 U£.
Y�•'. ;.1 .; r• ! Y•.{r'(J,. ,.;):•
I hereby cellfy_theYthf& Cer}ifieate of.Survey N Description O Easement Cl Plan 0 5peytfidetii
❑ o[ Building'-cetioil Q was prepared y me or under my direct supervision and that l am'a du
Y• ;;.; fiegisjcred ujvey un r.t. of a State_ ofMlnnesotn. t:
.•
Reg. No. 3521 Date l i
\r
. _ .. _.
y. ;, r.~ C. i_ww i'w. .i, aft;• •O ll - 1 "r ,Sr
14
f/ `L
it o.a - icYJz
g'' • >lot '2j. d};OlLMOOD PARR, `Ramsey, County, M1ne;ota; except to a
a Nesilone=half of;sa{d Lot 211.,as measured DID tthe northe ty :1
na,southprly 1{nes.of:said'Lot 21; an0 except the'xestierly r,.a
97 1)0, fact, as' measured Along Inc nor.therly..and',sout#ierty
sn d:l.,ot -2%.� 1 in eas'terl bf.1 e. Mest,:orie=fiatft
Q { y 9 y
• J.r - 1 `.57i{��LOt .21 /1NA,6deP ai Z
r'
•!.• a r •` j 1 t
fir. ' �'• •`•• r, ',t • ... . •, {,, .'
r. ems.
RESOLUTION NO. 2275
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION APPROVING MINOR SUBDIVISION FOR
2909 WOODALE DRIVE, ALPHONSE L. PETRON,
PLANNINC CASE NO. 227-87
EIHEREAS, Alphonse L. Petron, 2909 Woodale Drive, has
requested approval of a minor subdivision creating two lots
meeting the requirements of Chapter 40.06, Subd. B; and
WHEREAS, the City Staff and the Mounds View Planning
Commission have reviewed the preliminary plat and determined that
the existing structures meet the minimum setback requirements;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE iT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Mounds View approves the minor subdivision for
Alphonse L. Petron, 2909 Woodale Drive, contingent upon the
following:
ATTEST:
(SEAL)
�1
1. Mr. Petron submit a certified site plan and legal C
desciipton.
2. Mr. Petron remove his driveway from the newly created
lot and construct an improved driveway on his lot by
July 1, 1988.
Adopted this 28th day of December, 1987.
ayor
C er -Admiu stra-tor
u
MEMO TO: Clerk -Administrator and City Council
FROM: City Planner Herman
DATE: December 14, 1987
SUBJECT: RECYCLING PROGRAM FOR CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
Ramsey County has made available funds to cover 100%
costs of a curbside recycling program in Mounds View.
would cover direct expenses plus public education and
a0ministration costs not to exceed 25 percent of the
recycling budget.
of the
The grant
program
total
Mounds View tax payers pay for this grant program through a
special levy tacked on to their property taxes. In the recent
past, the levy has risen dramatically and the Recycling
Coordinator for Ramsey County estimates the cost to rise from
$2.24 in 1987 to approximately $e.00 is 1988. It is unclear when
the levy will stabilize.
On page three of the Grant Program Guidelines it states that
demonstrated efforts toward organized collection of City refuse
is a "minimum criteria". It seems that Ramsey County has set a
target date to achieve organized collection county -wide. There
are potential benefits to be gained by the community through
organized collection and this requirement should not be perceived
as a detriment to the program.
Staff recommends applying for the grant money in order to take
advantage of the opportunity to obtain a valuable service free of
cost and to allow the residents of Mounds View to benefit from a
tax they will pay regardless of City participation in the
program. In addition, the Metroplitan Council and Ramsey County
have made recycling a high priority. While the program is
currently voluntary, there is reason to believe that the County
may make participation manditcry if full participation is roc
obtained through this program.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff proposes to draft a budget and grant
app ic— ai Cron based on criteria given to obtain funds for setting
up a recycling program in the City of Mounds View.
KJH/bac
GUIDELINES AND
APPLICATION INFORMATION.
Ramsey County Recycling Grant Program
t Background
The Ramsey County Board of Commissioners has approved funds for
the purpose of exp ,iding municipal recycling program in 1988. A
grant program has been established for muncipalities to finance
recycling using these funds. The funds will pay for 1004 of the
cost for once -monthly curbside collection.
ProaraM go
Al
The main goal of the Recycling Grant Program is to expand
curbside recycling services so that all the households in the
county have monthly curbside recycling service in 1988f • This
goa_ is consistent with the overall landfill abatement goals in
the Ramsey County mastergan f4.L ,.Loj yi ;Jaste Management.
I, .
The County grant monies for recycling are available to all
municinalitiea and townships within Ramsey County. This includes
the cities of St. Anthony and White Bear Lake, which are partly
In other counties. The amount of funds available to these two
cities will based on the number of households actually in Ramsey
County. The City of Spring Lake Park and North Oaks will not be
eligible for funding if they are exempted from the recycling
service charge.
How Can Zbi Grant Fundg Be Used?
The funds can be used for expenses incurred by a city in
providing a recycling program. The major expenditures will likely
be payments to a collection contractor, public education and
program administration. Part of the application process will
require the applicant to submit a proposed budget. Public.
education and program administration costs cannot exceed 25
percent of the total recycling program budget.
991 Does The Program Work?
Cities and towns requesting funds must submit an application to
the county which outlines an implementation plan for curbside
recycling. The application must contain a tentative budget, the
implementation plan for the recycling program and a draft request
for proposal (RFP) which the city will be issuing to recycling
service providers. Not having gone out for bid yet, it will be
difficult for cities to accurately project a budget for
contractor costs. The average figure for 1987 plus 58, for a.
total figure of $3.20 per household can be used. County staff
are more interested in reviewing the city's plans and budget for
public education, and the final budget can be firmed up later.
Within two weeks after the city submits the application to the
county, the county staff will review the application and
determine whether or not the minimum criteria (see below) have
been met. Once it is determined that the minimum criteria have
been met, the city should issue the RFP to the recycling service
providers.
Within one month after issuing the RFP, the cities should begin
to negotiate. contracts with a service provider and with the
county. Once a county contract has been finalized, the contract
will be approved first by the city council and then the County
Hoard. Once the contract between the city and county has been
fully executed, a copy will be returned to the city. The county
does not need to be a party to the contract between the city and
service provider. :
How N2ch Money S—an 8 S..S_ty De I4 &cgive.2
The -exact amount of city will be awarded will depend upon the
contract negotiations between the city and service provider and
between the city and the county. The county budget estimated
amounts that a city would need to finance- a recycling progra.
The county budget estimated a cost of $4.31 Der household Der
.yea. (includes overhead expenses), but actual ccsts will vary
from city to city.
What System Mill ft Uscd For Payment IQ Cities?
Once a contract between the city and county has been sinned, the
county will reimburse the city quarterly for expenses incurred.
A County claim form must be signed by the chief administrative
Officer or Recycling Coordinator for the municipality or
township. The claim form should indicate if the expense was for
collection contractors, public education or administrative
expenses. Also, the tonnage recycled must be indicated on the
claim form. The city is required to maintain detailed documents
of hll expenses should a county, state or Metropolitan Council
audit ever become necessary.
Minimum Criteria
The minimum criteria shown below must be incorporated by the
grant application. County staff will work with cities to clear
up deficiencies, if any.
The grant money must be used to fund curbside collection
services, public education for recycling, and administrative
M
costs (staff time).. Public education and administrative
expenses together must not exceed 25% of the total recycling
program budget. Public- education must, at least, consist of a
brochures to all :iouseholds being served by the program.
- Recycl,'..g-materials must be delivered to the Ramsey County
Recycling Facility. Newspapers can be delivered directly to
market but paper market weight slips must be submitted as part
of the reporting requirements.
Newspaper, glass, (clear, brown .and 'green), aluminum cans,
bimetal cans; and tin cans must be collected curbside at least
monthly.
A mid -year and a final report muse be submitted to the county.
The report should include a list of the program activities and
their costs, a narrative explaining the successes and
shortcomings of the program, any progress made on implementing
organized collection, and such as participation rates and
tonnages collected. `
- Demonstrable efforts must be made eventually move from an open
hauling system to an organized collection system which will
include financing provisions for curbside recycling services.
Alternative methods may also be possibla, but the 'city must
begin to explore some type of long-term financing method.
Schedule
The .--t is to have curhaiAe service
in 1988. This requires that several
carried out simultaneously between th
contractors.
�1'
s
start as early as possible
administrative functions be
city, county and recycling
MEMO TO: Clerk -Administrator Pauley
FROM: City Planner Herman
DATE: December 17, 1987
SUBJECT: DYNAMIC DESIGNERS, PLANNING CASE NO. 138-83
7656 AND 7660 WOODLAWN DRIVE
CBAPTERS 48, 49 AND 49A REVIEW BY CITY
Dynamic Designers is proposing to develop two fourplexes on their
property. The Planning Commission began the review process at
the December 16 meeting by discussing Chapter 40 issues. In a
previous memo received by the City Council, it stated two
variances were needed for this proposal. After further review,
Staff has found that the variance for usable open space is not
needed; please see attached.
The Planning Commission has requested that the developer resubmit
a plan with some proposed changes to the driveway and parking
areas. I anticipate receiving this in time for the next Planning
Commission agenda session.
The issue of a wetland alteration permit and conditional use
permit for filling was only briefly discussed at the December 16
meeting. In keeping with Chapter 48, the wetland alteration
permit is being directed to the Council for their direction as to
the review process.
A fair amount of information is already known about the wetland
i:, which this development lies. Short -Elliott -Hendrickson is
conducting a study of the drainage basin in that area and will in
the near future be able to give the City information on the
impact this proposal will have on the wetland and storm drainage
and run-off.
Attached is the phosphorus stripping calculations submitted with
this plan. Tile City Engineer has reviewed this submittal and is
comfortable with its conclusion.
There is agreement that the wetland is larger than it need be
based on run-off, flooding, and stripping capabilities. The
question is how much filling can occur at that wetland and then;
what proportion of that filling can occur for this proposal.
Additional issues such as lot size and frontage need also to be
addressed.
I will be at your December 21 meeting to discuss this issue
further and receive your direction.
KJH/bac
Attachments
0
r.
ri
MEMO TO: Planning Commission
FROM: City Planner Herman
DATE: December 16, 1987
SUBJECT: DYNAMIC DESIGNERS USABLE OPEN SPACE,REQUIREMENT
City Code 40.04, Subdivision B(e), requires that each multiple
family dwelling site have a minimum of 625 square feet of usable
open space per dwelling unit. In a staff report previously
written regarding the Dynamic Designers proposal, it was noted
that the requirement for usable open space was not adequate and a
variance would be necessary. Staff has since reviewed the site
plan and determined that the proposal does meet, and in fact
exceeds, the usable open space requirement.
If you have any questions, please let me know.
/b.ac
JA
1EDLUND
Planning Er,;. ing Surveying
Kim Herman, City Planner December 14, 1987
City of Mounds Viet+
2401 Highway 10
Mounds View, MN 55112
Re: Mr. Jiro Cepress, Dynamic Designers
Dear Ms. Herman:
Encloseo is a map of the drainage area into Bronson Pond. The map
has been divided into land -use districts. Each district has a
unique nutrient loading runoff factor so a nutrient loading to
the wetland can be determined for each district. The following
calculations illustrate the nutrient loading and the assimilative
capacity of the wetland involved.
PRESENT USE FUTURE USE
Area Loading Area Loading
fAe1 (lbj.Ac/Yr) (Ael (ib/Ac/Yr)
Multiple 0.0 3.46 1.05 3.46
Dwelling
Single 0.31 0.45 0.31. 0.45
Family
Commercial 5.01 1.33 5.0i 1.33
Industrial
TOT. LOADING 6.66 Lbs/Yr 10.43 Lbs/Yr
Grassy 3.85 12.0 2.73 12.0
Marsh
TOT. CAPACITY 46.2 Lbs,Yr 32.8 Lbs/Yr
The total allowable fillable acres is determined by balancing the
lost assimilative capacity per acre of fill plus the additional
loading due to the use of the area with the surplus assimilative
capacity:
Fillable Acres = _(4 R7 - 10- 3) lbs/Yr = 2.3 Acres
(12 + 3.46) lbs/Ac/Yr
Minimum Wetland Preservation Area (3.65 - 2.3) Acres = 1.55 I.
Therefore the proposed development does not affect the nutrient
assimilative capacity of the wetland involved.
Si,IncereI
A cc: S. Woods, RCWD
ulie Myhre, engineer Jim Cepress
9201 East Bloomington Freeway, Bloomington, Minnesota 55420, Telephone (612) 888-0289
MEMO T0: MAYOR AND CITY COON L
FROM: CLERK-ADMINISTRATO
DATE: DECEMBEK 16, 1957
SUBJECT: PUBLIC WORKS CALLOUT PRACTICES
At the DestinghthatAgenda
theSCity's currentession you 1practicesmforndum
sugg
from me Bugg
callout of Public Works Employees after hours be changed.
The recommendation theoninened in Publicthis Worksemorandum Employeeswas to rotatego to
a system whereby basis and that a pager be leased
callout duties on a weeklybasis
on callout to wear to allow
by the City for the Nmploy
them some freedom while being held responsible to restc
all Public Works callouts during the seven day duty period.
In response to this memorandum, you requested additional
information in the following areas.
1. The specific cost �f oaaer systems. In response
to a request from this office of ght companies
asing
listed in the Yellow
ivedstworenting
proposalsewhich
of pager systems, I rece
are as follows,
a) PAGENET with a lease rate of $14.95 per month
for the first eighteen months of leasing and
$2.95 per month thereafter for
rtair time only
one only pager.
with the proposal being
for a b) AIRSIGNAL, INC. with a lease rate of $11.0udes
per month for a tone only pager
the cost of air time.
2. Additional Payroll CoouT LaboraConsultantched efornd
a survey provided by
Stanton Group V employees listing their 1996
Standby Pay Provisions. The cities of Anoka,
Brooklyn Park, Coon Rapids, Crystal, Fridley,
Golden Valley- New Brighton, No. St. Paul and
Roseville appear to have the most similar
practices to that proposed by my precious
memorandum. As you can see, the additional
payroll benefits they provide for seven day
standby duty vary from seven days of straight
time fo; =-van days of standby duty to six
hours at time and one-half. Indiscussing
fthis
matter with our consultan' CY Smythe,
that we should be able to nsgutiate a standby
the ee be
provision that provides that
eriodeforobetween
on standby for a seven day p
three and four hours at time and one-half which
would in a cost Of
week. rThist4
translates to an annual cost6fromr
MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
PAGE TWO
DECEMBER 16, 1987
$2,831.40 to $3,775.20.
The specific language of the contract wouldindicate
that the employee would be on standby duty
seven day period with the specific time
y to period
day and
indicated, most likely from a
that the employee would be only paid for the callout
duty should they actually be required to leave their
home and respond to a service call. It would be
clearly stipulated in the contract and understood by
the employees that the City would not be paying
them
for receiving phone calls or responding to citizens
concerns over the phone not requiring their actual
travel to the City to deal with the matter.
Fund_ Source.. With the cost of the standby duty
being between $2,800.00 and $3,800.00 and the cost
for pager rental being approximately $150.00 per
year, the City would need between $3,000.00 and
$4,000.00 in 198S to fund this change in practices.
As you all know, the position of Public kthe year
Director/City Engineer was fully funded for
1980 bu: the pnGitinn will not be filled until
approximately April 1st. At a budgetea annual
salary of $40,877.00, the vacanc406n4this
srpO ition
month or
would result in a saving. 406.4 which would be
$10,219.26 for the three month period
divided equally between
the General of Fund,
Watertand
Sewer for a savings per
funcity's callout practices relate to callouts for all
types of activities including water, sewer and
streets, I would suggest that the cost of the new
program be divided equally between Water, Sewer and
General Fund therefore based upon the above
information there would be more than adequate monies
in both of these funds to coverthe costsic Of this
new program with the vacancy of
Pubks
Director/City Engineer position.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff would recommend that Coureil
authorize the negotiation of a change in the Publicorks
contract to add a clause for standby duty
outlining the
provisions contained above and to lease a pager from
AIRSIGNAL, INC. at a cost of $11.00 per month. Upon
agreement with theOniStaff wouldhimplement e in hthe change e contract to and
receipt of the pageY
osed immediate) thereafter.
the Citl's callout system as prop
DFP/mjs
Attachments:
n
LABOR RELATIONS ASSOCIATES, !NC
7501 Golden Valley Road
/'ti Golden Valley, Minnesota W27
( • � 612/546.1470
���ipll 1213/S ,
• December 10, 1987
TO: Don Pauley, City Manager 1,
City
of Mourls View
FROM: C. F. Smytge�(Consultant
SUBJECT: STANDBY PROVISIONS IN STANTON
GROUP V PUBLIC WORKS LABOR AGREEMENTS
You requested on December 10, 1987 information with regard to the
manner in which Stanton Group V Cities deal with Standby
Pay/Obligations in their public works Labor Agreements.
Enclosed is the information you requested. Some cities require the
standby person(s) to perform certain duties as part of the standby
duty; somo cities do not, and only require availability for call out
wl
duriug the standby period. many cities have no provision in their
Labor Agreements. The absence of a provision cannot necessdrily be
interpreted to mean that the city has no standby duty requirement for
certain of their public works employees. Some cities with no Labor
Agreement provision do, in fact, have a standby requirement,
Minnetonka for example. Minnetonka requires employees to take turns
on standby duty as a 'condition of employment" stated on hire of new
employees, and pays no additional compensation for such duty.
if I can be of further assistance please let me know.
CFS:hfa
Enclosure
l
City
Anoka
LT';)1-b630
Apple Valley
Blaine
Bloomington
STANTON GROUP V
1986 STANDBY PAY PROVISION
Standby PaY
7 days standby = 11 hours pay @ 1-1/2x
If a holiday occurs during standby, comp time
off for holiday. If called to work outside
their regular work schedule - 2 hrs pay at
1-1/2x, except the first call out of two (2)
hours or less shall be included as part of the
li hours. Hours worked in excess of 2 hrs paid
at 1-1/2x.'
No contract provision.
No contract provision.
Brooklyn Center Public utility employees who are designated by
their Supervisor to serve in a "standby" status
on behalf of the City on a Saturday, Sunday or
Holiday will receive as compensation for such
service two (2) hours of overtime pay for each
day served in sueb status. Such etandby pay
shall be in addition to other compensation
which the emolo,ee is entitled to under this
AGREEMENT.
Brooklyn Park Employees assigned to be on call after regular
f working hours and weekends will be compensated
y �, /A� $35.00 per week for remaining available for
nA W immediate return to duty.
Burnsville The employee on standby on Saturdays, Sundays
or holidays shall be compensated at the minimum
rate of 4 hours pay at 1-1/2x. Standby pay is
for checking only on Saturday, Sunday and
Holidays. Standby duty is for checking only on
Saturdays, Sundays, or holidays, and other work
is on a call back basis.
Circle Pines 3 hours pay at 1-1/2x for each Saturday and
Sunday that the employee is required to be on
emergency standby duty.
Columbia Heights The weekend duty for standby shall be continued
with the duty man to receive 2 hours 0 1-1/2x
for each day he is assigned duty.
Coon Rapids •��` 1 hour straight time for 8 hours standby
g� Qf V 01 between 3:30 p.m. and 7:00 a.m., in addition to
call back pay 0 1-1/2x for time worked with a
n7S minimum of 2 hours for each 24-hour period.
STANTON GROUP V
1986 STANDBY PAY PROVISION
City Standby Pay
Cottage Grove No contract provision.
Crystal 1 cvl�t Employees required by the employer to standby
ay period will be paid for 12
y holidayfallstraight withind
hours
the e7pday(period; 17hourshen hours
when two holidays fall within the 7-day
l period).
Eagan No contract provision.
Eden Prairie No contract provision.
Edina When required to be available for 24-hour
recall Saturdays, Sundays or Holidays to
operate utilities, apart from a regularly
scheduled shift, the City shall pay a minimum
of 4 hours at 1-1/2x. For hours of ectual work
up to the minimum, no additional compensation
shall be paid. All time over the 4 hour
minimum shall be paid at the overtimo rate.
Early report or extension does not qualify.
A,Fridley 5p 2 hours A 1-1/2x for each day on standby on
?J Saturday, Sunday and Holidays.
4 hours 0 1-1/2x for standby during the week;
if called out, minimum 1-1/2x for 1 hour min.
J Gold alley t 9 hours straight time pay from 4:30 p.m. Friday
to 8:00 a.m. Monday. If a holiday occurs,
5y3 .90' 4-1/2 hours additional pay.
Hastings Weekend duty for utility department only; 4
hours 0 1-1/2x for each day for checking only.
Call back to work at call back rate. 2x for
the holidays o2 Christmas, New Years, 4th of
July, Labor Day and Thanksgiving Day. During
June, July and August only employees receive 5
hrs compensation at 1-1/2x of pay for each day.
Hopkins It is agreed that the differential between MTCE
II and Sewer and Water Worker is the necessity
to standby. Call out during standby
compensated as overtime subject to minimum call
out of 2 hours.
STANTON GROUP V
1986 STANDBY PAY PROVISION
City Standby Pay
Inver Grove Heights
Lakeville Standby is assigned by the EMPLOYER for a
minimum period of 24 hours. Employees assigned
tadby 1-if standby onholiday1 1/2xf 2 urs ay plus
G1/2x.
holiday pay. Call out during standby at 1-1/2x
for houryhour period atinom. First additionalaPay forduping a 4 to the
first two hours.
Maple Grove No contract provision.
Maplewood No contract provision.
Minnetonka No contract provision.
Mounds View ) No contract provision.
(' New Brighton 0, The employee on standby duty shall work 2 hours
on Saturday and 2 hours Sunday on the week the
�193 Gjog employee is scheduled in accordance with duties
assigned by the EMPLOYER and shall be
compensated at 1-1/2x the base pay rate.
New Hope ` D
% North St. Paul `y Utilities employees required to standby for 7
°l days receive 6 hours pay 9 1-1/2x for each 7
D daya of standby. if holiday occurs, 8 hours A
�pvy 1-1/2x rather than 6 hours.
Oakdale Weekend Duty Pay. An employee scheduled
weekend duty shall work a minimum of 2 hours
for checking facilities and shall be available
for call out in case of emergency. An employee
on weekend duty will be paid 4 hours pay per
day at straight time. An employee on weekend
duty shall not receive call back pay unless he
is called out during a time not performing
work required as part of weekend duty.
Plymouth
Ramsey
STANTON GROUP V
1986 STANDBY PAY PROVISION
City
Standby Pay
Richfield
No contract provision.
Robbinsdale,No
contract provision.
Roseville kag
Utility maintenance employees will be
compensated for standby duty at the rate of 1
3 3 �u1
hour regular salary for each day the employee
is required to be on standby except Saturday,
Sunday and Holidays.
St. Anthony
Employees required to be on standby on
Saturday, Sunday and Holidays shall be
compensated for standby assignment at 3 hours
at 1-1/2x. Standby duty shall include routine
check of pumps and other City facilities. Any
other work required other than routine checks
shall be compensated In the amount specified by
the Overtime clause.
St. Louis Park
No contract provision.
Shakopee
No contract provision.
a r
Shoreview
South St. Paul
No contract provision.
Stillwater
Weekend duty. Employees who are required to
work on Saturdays, Sundays or holidays in
addition to their regularly assigned shift
shall be compensated at 1-1/2x for such days
and shall receive a minimum of 4 hrs
compensation for each Saturday, Sunday or
holiday. Employees will make routine checks of
City sewer facilities. Any call -outs other
than those routine duties shall receive 4 hours
compensation.
West St. Paul
Sewer Mtce Dept Personnel. 2.5 hours @ 1-1/2x
for each 24 hour unit of standby duty. Lift
station inspection shall be required once per
day; compensation shall be a minimum 2 hours @
1-1/2x for each series of inspection made:
Work required beyond the 2 hour minimum will be
at 1-1/2x. Emergency call out will be paid at
1-1/2x with a minimum of 2 hours per call out.
�✓
White Bear Lake
No contract provision.
Woodbury
No contract provision.
MEMO TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: CLERK-ADMINISTRATO
DATE: DECEMBER 15, 1987
SUBJECT: MEETING WITH MOUNDS VIEW SCHOOL BOARD
Attached please find a letter from M. Joeilen Johnson,
Chairman of the Mounds View Public School Board inviting the
City Council to a joint meeting between the Council and the
Baord on issues of mutual interest. The meeting is
suggested to occur on the evening of Thursday, February 11th
at 7:30 p.m. at Pinewood Elementary School.
Should Council agree to this meeting, Staff would request an
indication as to whether or not the February llth date is
acceptable in order that a response to this letter might be
provided.
Also, Staff would suggest two other items are added to the -<<
agenda for discussion that evening. Y
1. Discussion of the relationship between the
City of Mounds View Parks and Recreation
Department and the School District's Community
Education Department.
2. The relationship and interaction between the City
of Mounds View Parks and Recreation Department,
Community Ed., Irondale High School, and the
Hounds View Community Theater Board.
These have been issues that the Council has voiced a strong
interest in in the past and although these problems seem to _
be resolving themselves through the efforts of the various
staff members, it would seem appropriate that the Council
and the Board receive a presentation from the various staff
members on both the City and the School District side to
clarify the issues currently at hand and what effort is
being undertaken to resolve those issues.
Your direction in this matter would be greatly appreciated.
DFP/mjs
Attachment:
cc: Parks, Recreation and Forestry Director Saarion
IV
Independent School District No. 621
n Mounds View Public Schools
2959 North Hamline Avenue a St. Paul. Minnesota a 55113 a Phone (612) 636.30
Dr. Burton M. Nygren, Superintendent
December 11, 1987
School Board
Joelles Johmon
Chalmaa
Glen Winch,m
Ka Charnnen Mayor Jerry Linke
suchud Smith Members of the City Council
Clerk Don Pauley, Clerk Administrator
11"dHarm City of Mounds View
ne6Y ' 2401 Highway A10
Pes olwa St. Paul, Minnesota 55112 ---
naRror _-
RkhW Polish Ladies and Gentlemen:
Drnrror
Nq Jdo On behalf of the Mounds View School Board, I invite you to meet
Di1e"°r with us early in the new year to discuss such questions of mutual
interest as:
What is your latest information on Mounds View's demographics?
Where will kids attend school during the years of fluctuating
enrollment? ,,++��
How will AIDS affect school curriculum, management, and the l„�.`"
community?
Can we assist each other in long-range planning?
Are there ways we can improve communications between city
and school district?
You may wish to add other items to the list.
If you agree that a meeting of city and school official: is a good
Idea, we suggest 7:30 p.m., February 11, at Pinewood Elementary
School: 5500 Quincy Street, Mounds View. lie will also take a
few minutes that evening to show you the new rooms constructed during
the past months.
Please -call Janet Folsom, Administrative Assistant to the Superin-
tendent and School Board, 636-3650, if this plan is agreeable to you,
or if you prefer another date. Thank you.
Sincerely,
M. Joellen Johnson, Chairman
MJJ:rs
Serving the communities of Arden Hills a Mounds View a New Brighton a North Oaks a Roseville a Shoreview a Vadnab Heights
Equal Opportunity for Education and Employment
f xr"' V
MEMO TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUN
FROM: CLERK-ADNINISTRA
DATE: DECEMBER 7, 1987
SUBJECT: METROPOLITAN AIRPORTS COMMISSION 1988-89 CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM
Attached please find a notice from the Metropolitan Council
transmitting the Metropolitan Airports Commission's 1988
Capital Improvement Projects and 1989 Capital Improvement
Program for our review and comment.
Staff has reviewed this document and determined that the
projects and improvements proposed are consistent with the
agreement entered into between the City of Mounds View and
the Metropolitan Airports Commission and, therefore, would
request Council authorization to submit a letter to the
Metropolitan Council of positive findings.
DFP/mjs
Attachment:
H.-
It
°, atao 0.
N
•tea �r
November 24, 1987
To Whom It May Concern:
RE: Metropolitan Airports Cammission
1988 Capital Improvement Projects
1989 Capital Improvement Program
Received 11/23/87
Metropolitan Council Referral File No. 14356-1
Metropolitan Council
300 Metro Square Building
Seventh and Robert Streets
St. Paul, Minnesota 55101
Telephone (612) 291.6359
D'cCIC87
!zOra / D.
;., rg"WJ
The Metropolitan Council has received the Metropolitan Airports Commission 1988
Capital Improvement Projects and 1989 Capital Improvement Program for review
and comment.
The Council will be reviewing this in the next few weeks and would welcome any
comments you may wish to make. Any comments should be sent within one week.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 'All qr-,//%
ohn Rutford
Referral Coordinator
JR:ch
An Egwl opportunity Employer
C
kA
OFFICE OF EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR • PHONE (612) 726.1892
November 19, 1987
Mr. Steve Keefe, Chair
Metropolitan Council
300 Metro Square Building
7th and Robert Streats
St. Paul, 11N 55101
Re: Metropolitan Airports Commission
1988 Capital Improvement Projects
1989 Capital Improvement Program
Dear Mr. Keefe:
METROPOLITAN COUNC1
REFERRAL Ark
FILE NO. /�?j�'�
The Metropolitan Airports C•mmission, at its meeting on November 16. 1981,
approved the Capital Improvement Projects to be acceapiished on its
airport system in 19P8, along with a 1989 Capital Improvement Program.
The 1988 projects have been approved for implementation; the 1989 projects
have been approved for preliminary planning and further evaluation such
that they can be more accurately defined, both in scope and estimated
cost, and submitted to the Commission in late 1988 for approaal for
implementation in 1989. The documentation necessary to encumber Federal
finding for the eligible 1989 proje,.cs will be initiated in conjunction
with the preliminary plans, etc.
The Metropolitan Council approved the Commission's 1987-88 Capical
Improvement Program in February, 1987, with certain exceptions. However,
due to modifications since that action, the 1988 projects are .being
presented along with the 1989 Capital Improvement Program. A copy of each
year's program, which includes a short narrative of each project and
skecches indicating the areas of construction, are attached.
The relationship of the 1988-89 projects ro a five-year plan is indicated
on our five-vear Capital Improvement Plan (1990-1994) which is also
attached for your information.
We would appreciate a timely review of this material by the Metropolitan
Council in order that. your comments can be incorporated into our
applications for Federal Aid.
OFFICE LOCAIICN-6000 26th AVE. SO. —WEST TERMINAL AREA—MINNEAPOLIS•SAINT PAUL INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Z
Ifs
we
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL'
REFERRAL
Hr. Steve Keefe l FILE NO.
Page 2
November 19, 1987
if you should desire further information, do not hesitate to contact our
office.
Sincerely,
e
y.
Jeffrey W. Hamiel
Executive Director
JWH/111
SK/AO
140
M,
ANOKA Con -I"! -VAIN- 00
pavement: Rehabilitation • 5200 000
Periodically, it is necessary to rehabilitate aircraft operational
areas (runways, taxiways, aprons) through bituminous overlays,
sealcoats or, in some instances, reconstruction to restore the
surfaces to a smooch, even condition and improve overall operating
conditions. This project will consist of sealcoaring alleyways in
the west building area and overlays on the south building area
taxiway, apron and alleyways. Previously approved by the Commission.
&Unwav 8.26 Construction - $l 200,000
Consistent with the Master Plan Study and subsequent environmental
documentation, this project will extend the east/west runway (8/26)
and parallel taxiway 800 feet east. The existing runway pavement
will be reconstructed to the same pavement section and the existing
taxiway overlaid. Previously approved by the Commission.
poad co-s-ruc^+or - $450 000
the exte-sion of Runway 8/26 to the east will require tat
St -het be closed to tram=ie. Discussions have beer. held with the
appropriate municipal and state o£aciais conce ring alternate routes
ite tra=a-'c and '- has been determined 101st avenue
rot ex_stcng t•;1 •-- '" .+ ,
south be upgraded to at.a�ocate closing %vlite. `rnis project
prov'_de for the reconst=ct_on of 101st A:•e:ue '_ro= its '_htarsactiot
with %elite easterly to `7apies Street. Previously approrad by the
Commission.
D._,,:, Cteanin. - e50.000
Drainage at the airport has beer. a continual problem for some time.
Ire -ecent east buildin3 area and bitc_ino s const^_ct:on projects
included the clew-ning of secents o_: drainage ditch which has proven
to be a definite improvement to the proble=. This project will be a
continuation of the ditch cleancrt program previously initiated.
Pre•:iousiy approved by the Commission..
Sew -1 enc'^ S150.000
It is proposed a perimeter sec,--'- y fencing program be initiated !Or
the airport that will be implemented trough a phased program over
-_pee yeas.
=—e p'otect'on Date -a'- Svste^ - S121 000
The city Of Kaine has requested a wateraain for fire oroton
purposes be extended from their system to serve the existinghangar
areas on the airport. This project would serve the Gest Bu'_'_ding
Area.
13
1988 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Reliever Airports
ST. PAUL D0174TOIJN
= Building Area Expansion
= Pavement Rehabilitation
v Snow Removal Eq,dpment Building
9 Airport Beacon Tower Replacement
= Bayfield Street Relocation
Administration 6 Other MAC Building Rehab
SELF-LIQUIDATING
$4,250,000
700,000*
500,000
50,000*
125,000
300,000
Apron Conscruction/Rehabilitation a 5 00
Subtotal $6,350.000
,FLYING CLOUD
Pavement Rehabilitation
C• YS^ r
= Pavement Rehabilitation
A1n:L4 COLN-Y-11a12
= Pavement Rehabilitation
Rturway Constaution
Runway 8/26
Road Construction
Ditch Cleaning
Security Fencing
a Fire Protection patermain System
50 000 -
Subtotal $ 250.000
100.000*
Subtotal $ 200,000
$ 200•,000*
1,200,000*
450,000*
50,000*
150,000
300 000
Subtotal $2,350.060
17 W
L�U MOR
nn a pavement Rehabilitation
ay
AIRUY.E
u Acquisition
Haintenance Equipment Building Impr.
a Fire protection Wacermain System
* previously approved by tae Hetro COunc 1.
Eligible for Federal and/or $race funding.
18
��x1l�id
iubtotal $50,000
$ 500,000*
50,000
5 000
Subtotal $ 675,000
Annual
Total $9,875,000
AN1CiC01 —N—BUIVr AIRPORT
Securiry Fencir.e • $15 0000
This will be a continuation of the phased program initiated in 1988
to provide a perimeter security fence system around the airport's
operational areas.
89CIP/AO
8
1989 CAPITAL IHPROVEHEI'T PROGRAM
Reliever Airports
ST. PAUL DOU%'TOVM
7 a Pavement Rehabilitation $ 800,000*
a CFR Building and Equipment. 500,000*
Administration and Other MAC Building Rehab. 100,000
Subtotal $ 1,400,000
CP.1 STP.L
Equipment Maintenance Building
p\OKA
a Security Fencing
Previously approved by the Hetro Council.
= Eligible for Federal and/or State ::nding.
89CI?TrS/AO
10
$ 250,000
Subtotal $ 250,000
$ 150,000
SLLbtOtal $ 150,OCO
Total
$ 1,800,000
. w.•-:NeM.Yw.dG•.V:t-9W- ..-_-. +. �iy�
wuz.'"wee— �'k• �.,,. ....xe.+tr fi
1988 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
I I '
ROAD CONSTRUCTIO,
1 I G�i7� i l .I1 •• i .L. �'�•� i_ �•
._� .. _ •,�'-.I_ _{ , ! I III,. �ir�hi! .—. I
r
L
A I:,
RWY. 8/26 CONSTRUCTION
1 Y l I 1 Ij�, =(` _. • , �� —�— . i `. its
� ....... ;;�' ,i II �' i p�7t,lCRE -IABILITATION
I ... , rl _ J��.I
�rl��I I I
FIRE PR EC 10 i �A�, I "
W 'ERM . 'sY•.TEm-
d
,Id'SECURIT FEN INij
ANOKA COUNTY — BLAINE AIRPO
I JANUARY
1989 CAPITAL` OPROVEMENT
FtNCING
ANOKA COUNTY - BL,
JANUARY 1285
PROJECTS
AIRIICAPCLIS-1T. ?ALL INTERNATIONAL
FILER R 1111YA15
Apra P.:lel
Red SmtAnsl Ruyv/Cerle Area
hresed IebebHll1110
Apices, Iota., Lit.
".,nsr 1122
Rueeel Ill/79R
Rwerr 111129L
Ausvt7 I/22 h1143104
luleel 1 Cmttrudim
hslvel C Ceaslrudlm
hduer C 10 CsepTer
Ale1m1 Deism
[eerlesq Aseeu Ands
Resldll period" Iselur Isprovueds
Slit hiprdlm
Itlusbaus Cmelrvdles
Ahadluems Casslrudlm
Iledrlcal PodllTullms
ILI. liver Ivlb hicatles #jet$ 110411.
[RVIRONSENIAL
Roles Rmllsrlq Stales
Rates Su?prestar
lied use Radlflulfon
SCLF-1.1901 FIRS
RSA WAIII Isellllr
Reube Alrlhes Yddussce Reeger
r.LS, hdlltr
Srees Consult RavhO Sldevells
CAPITAL CAPIIAI
IIPDOVIAIRT IAr00V11191
PROJECTS POOORAA
1900 19H
I,soo,oae 7,DDo,eoe
Il,eoD,00D
!,000,DOD
11,040,600
5,000,000
1,000,D00
I1-0,000
700,000
IOO,000 IOD,000
100,000 100,000
500,000 SOO,OOD
150,000 750,000
100,000
500,000
SnLinlel S,IS0,000 ]9,TSD,0o0
BOO,OoO
0
CAPITAL IMAOVEAEII PLAIT
HID 1111 I717 TITS 1911 -
1,500.000
7,000,000 2,000,000 7,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,60
3,000,000
0,100,000 - 5,000,000
100,30
100,000
100,000
...:
500,005
250,000
300,000
250,001
310,400
250,000
$00,906
230,OOe
25e to
100,t00 •
100,600
10e,000
7,150,008 -'
14,0k,000
2,150,000
2,150,060
7,150,000
1,030.00
500,000 50D,000 I Lend Ulf Aodlllulimt Ierved 1189 Is Is ddeJ to Ise W pm FAA
.epprovel of the Pert ISO 9ludr
Sublotel 7,300,000 500,000 0
41,000,000
5,000,000 "
I7,000,boo
1,00D,boe ,
Subtotal. 45,000,000 11,000,600 0 D 0 0 d 0
CAPITAL
CAPITAL
110'AOVIAIAI
IAPAOVIAIVT
PHI:CIS
flDGIAA
PAONCIS
1911
net
LAAlellt
Gera Concourse Mllslea
lteditrii lefolal blaiu 16411111dien
1,000,000
170 000
Id Cncaur,e Iderlor Aei3Oillblloa
100 000
true ceacaury Interlor ArA6itlidlon
lglond terminal Vfilo,r eeA,illlt.•Ilon
50'00e
Dollar Plitt NET. 1 Sorer Itproteaed,
1,SOo,MO
Id A live Cmceurat Iecloalcal System Cmrersloa
1.500,000
late It Vertical Circulation
:00,000
lualarlallaa Center
Vlllll f Ieiarmllrwa
1,100,D00
Vertical Circulation 1 Atli Itald Rev.
3,150,e00
luaeldsiyaplw nal Tract, tit.
11,000,000
Goad Iraecpaltalla control Syalea
300,000
ne.too
terminal Coapin SprlAlter System
100,000
100.000
Inrmrd ccnrnl0 leduclloa
300,000
territory Pour Seeley Iglnfrmral,
/00,d00
Primary net. Iblltliulloa Spin Upirile
1,000,000
felled Plate Telling I.e1allillallon
7,000,000
lladitgh leralal Abrrl Nntott Aodnlcalla,
150,000
750.000
Ilditgi terminal Cnlriatt Joe, Aeplatfaenl
Atatial System Otllow Corer Aoalelcallon,
170 000
Irsaloreer Hato",
)OG.000
500,000
310,000
Vfett 0iopou,l Slallaa
ltdit/0i Terminal clrlrital Aalllleallont
140,000
u
CAPITAL I11PAOYt11FAT FLU
t
n1i 1111 Din HIT . till ' : '�,w _ .ic
1 AGI,OK_.
eY
Stop
rt
`1
UM
-
lse,tot ltt,000
lm,oee lle,lal $t,lte
lto,00t
100,000
I00,000 t6e,IM
-. y-
CAN IAA
upim IMtO1EAElI ?LAM
ICMtIRI
Iri'POAA111
IAmROOi MII
1'POJICIS
MGM
rACROS
1110
1111
1112
P})
1111
file
11I1
tMISIOE ftmld
71,000,000
hrllal 1(ra+lws rh+re II
Aore
1,150,000
T,fA1,000
?0rllal 101110n people
150,000
101,000
_
Arllrl Slesslwt AeNlliffalloe
100,000
NO,Int
Ehnp/ 1011a+1 Irh+11II1011w
I1101ii1101im
-
ImA.q MAlllulfar I
1,000,000
IniwJlWlloud
1,100,000
701h Slesrl I roll Imd
300,000
I00,0A0
- 51,110
trw.0 fr ar}wldloa hill", Ares
100.000
50,000
SQ,060
leulasl Casplso l499esl0 Orrrlopsul
AAlul.lds
50,000
iafwulival J'9rw.11so+l 51111a1r
lest Orro0e11rI
le
700,000
700, 000
150,100
. 0
eta lallllhl Srnlus
1,,willlAl+ro Sides ad1111es11gr
700,000
_.
W71 lrulad b0ronlords
15,000
111,100
lisp 2>L4, Itwoll Iullliq
1,150,000
101,000
�1
S..rrd allies OJIUw
725,000
101,000
lest lndsd less trh011111d1oa
000,0N
130 061
7, ,
I,101,101
sa11a1+I
l9,159,000
1,400,000
7, 150,00p
550,00e
u,teP,ece
11,150,e4
..
a too lot
5,161,w1
3,250,00
Annnd Iddr
III,f00,0o0
R
5 7r. lottl
47,30,100
2 yr. told
111,050,000
1 Idyl
221,759,1/1
yr.
Y.•.�.�eY, �-��lru �u•:i,c� _•i�ti?.' 4. wl�'n"n Cl'i •ti: Y.\: tw':
;d
f,I
r��y'
PR0ILCIS
P111LVEA AIRPORTS
ST. PAR EOINIONN
Idldlnq A,t1 Iara"Ova
Pasant Rrhabllllallon
Tom Ino.al lmulparal lalldlmq
CIA ImIldlmq I Equipment
AOpal Irarn% loran Prplatearnl
Iaylirld Sliest 1111Yt+t IOm
Adalmlmlydlom 1 0711 MAC /ulldlmq Rehab.
SW-LISURaa INO
Aprw Ccnm6.cllmn/ArhaiIlH+IIm
IT VIVO CE000
Parnrnl Aehaillllalloo
ERMAL
Pnrmral 11641I I I a I I on
[gnlparnl Na IClrnanrl Idldlnq
[APART
CAPIIAL
IAI'AlIV1A1 Nl
IWIN 01
I
CAPITAL
IMPRMNI PLAN
1,11111105
PAOLAAA
1710
list
11H
II11
1117
IM
1110-..,
1,75Q,ow
1,000,wO
'•
l00,000
IOO,wO
500,Ow
10,010
500,000
300,w0
s11,odD
SO,OOA
I75,J00
100,000
100,000
50,0DO
w,Ow
SO,Iw
425,000
5u61m1+1
1,350,000
1,400'"0
550,000
7,7w,w0
31,400
0
i3P,0N
750,000
Subtotal
750,000
0
0
0
0
301,040
1.
7w,000
3w,000
730,E00
-
Subtotal
.00,000
750,OOD
0
0
0
300,010
0.
' CAII IAI CMIIAE
I NI'ADVINI NI 11111P.DYI II I
PROILCIS PAOGAM
fA01tt15
IL50 1119
AEIILVEN AIRPORTS
ANOAA CMAN-0LAINE
Paeearnl RehaAllilaticA
111141"1 Arra orellmpmet
Awap Castration
Runway 6176
Rat Comlructlol
filth ClraAing
Sturlll EratTnq
fire ►roletllm Ndeall SYdn
LAIE LINO
teetotal Arlamlllbrr on
Nurlh Iotlllni A:re CnllooamL
AIIIASL
Atgdsllla
98I111nante Equipment Witter Improvement
rift Prolarlla Ndtraln $Plan
7DD,DDD
1,70A,000
ISD,000
50,000
I50,000 ISO,D00
]"r0,C00
Subtotal 7,350,a0 I50,100
30,C4
5u51u1d 50,000 0
300,004
s 50,000
125,000
Witte: 6:5,000 0
Annuli totals 1,915,000 1,100,000
I yr. total II,61S,000
ASP I ALIIIVIAS
GRAND IAIAIS
ANNUAL 126,475,000 66,610,000
7 TIM 193,125,004
CAPITAL 111PROYEAEAT YEAR
.
1910
1191
IT17 1913
1911
Iso,000 700,001
600,000
—�
50,000
150,00
IS0,000
700,000
1",000 0
' - 700,001 .
250,000
750,100
—
254,000
0
P 231,001
7HAI
X_
130,000
2,500,000
150,000 IS0,005
,
5 qr. Told
6,350,100
`-
I p. Total
11,073,100
11,130,000
5,100,000
7,900,000 11,030,000
15,150,000
5 YEAR
33,150,000
I YEAR
24i,ft
1 MEMO T0: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL AT
FROM: FROM: CLERK -ADMINISTRATOR
DATE:
DECEMBER
16:
1981
SUBJECT:
ORDINANCE
NO.
434
Attached please find a copy of Ordinance No. 434 prepared
with the assistance of City Attorney Richard Meyers to
respond to the requirements of Chapter
3officers only may
Pon
e
may
Laws which provides that licensed p issue citations unless other officers
the
e municipaof thealitlity
are prodded explicit authority Y ordina
Ordinance No. 434 lists the various chapters of the
Municipal Code requiring enforcement by officers of the City
of the
other than police officers and tosenforcets the nthesprovisions of
positions having the authority Attorney Richard
these various chapters. As indicated,
City
ordinance and it is
Meyers was involved in preparing
this our recommendation that it be adopted at the earliest
possible date.
^,pJmjs
Attachment:
ORDINANCE N0. 434
1-' CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
AMENDING THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF MOUNDS VIEW BY AMENDING CHAPTER
1.11, ENTITLED, "GENERAL PROVISIONS OF CODE"
The City Council of the City of Mounds View does hereby
ordain:
Section I. Chapter 1.11 is hereby amended by adding the
following:
Chapter 39; Signs and Billboards: Building Of_`.icial,
City Planner, Clerk -Administrator.
Chapter 40; Zoning: City Planner and Clerk -Administrator
rhanfer 42e Subdivision Reaulations: Clerk -Administrator
44; Streets, Driveways: City Enginee
, Clerk -Administrator
45• Relocation of Buildings: Building
nner, Clerk -Administrator
47; House and Building Numbers: Commu
49A
U
Ci
Official
ORDINANCE N0. 434
PAGE TWO OF THREE
Chapter 64• Civil Defense: Civil Defense Director
Chapter 75; Gas Franchise: Clerk -Administrator
Chapter 76; Electric Franchise: Clerk -Administrator
Chapter 91• Animals: Community Service Officer
Chapter 92; Tree Diseases: Forester
Chapter 100; Intgxicatin Liquor: Clerk -Administrator
Chapter 101; Non-Intoxicatin Liquor: Clerk -Administrator
Chapter 104; Garbage and Rubbish: Clerk -Administrator
Cha ter 106; Gasoline Stations: Clerk -Administrator
Chapter 108; Public Dance Halls: Clerk -Administrator
Chapter 109; New and Used Cars: Clerk -Administrator
i
U'
Chapter 115• Bowling Alleys: Clerk -Administrator
/_
C
ORDINANCE NO. 434
VAGE THREE OF THREE
CRapcer llo; icineranc Amusemeac miaesp Garniydibe -
Circuses: Clerk -Administrator
i
Chapter 400; Administrative Offenses: As set forth in
Chapter 400
Section II. This ordinance she" take effect thirty
days from the date of its publication.
Read by the Council of the City of Mounds View on this
day of 1987.
Read and passed by the City Council of the City of Mounds
View this day of , 1987.
ATTFST:
Mayor — ---
(SEAL)
Clerk -Administrator
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney
MEMO TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL `kE' 10
FROM: MARY SAARION, DIRECTOR
PARKS, RECREATION AND FORESTRY
i
DATE: December 15, 1987
RE: Budget transfer request
I would like to request that the Council consider the transfer of
wage expenditures of two part-time summer public works employees
from Parks to Water and Sewer.
Each department including water and sewer budgeted for one part-time
summer employee. Parks budgeted for two part-time summer employees.
Four men were hired and were to perform work understanding that they
would be used in various departments as necessary. Inadvertantly,
George Pajunen and Timothy Hetland were approved for employment with
wages funded through the Parks Department. The wage expenditure
from designated departments should be have been:
Dan Otterson - Parks
CAndrew Gray - Parks
George Pajunen - {dater
Timothy Hetland - Sewer
RECOMMENDATION: To recind the past motion to fund the wages of
George Pajuner. and Timothy Hetland from the Parks fund and approve
the transfer of these expenditures to water, 700-121-4020 and sewer,
730-121-4020.
PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY 00[JNCIL? 9 pv
CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW
RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA
/ Regular Meeting
November 23, 1987
Mounds View City Hall
2401 Hwy. 10, Mounds View, MN 55112
----------------------------------------------------------------
The Mounds View City Council was called to order 1. Call to
by Mayor Linke at 7:00 PM on Monday, November 23, Order
1987.
The Pledge of Allegiance was said. 2. Pledge of
Allegiance
MEMBERS PRESENT:• Councilmembers Hankner, Blanchard, 3. Roll Call
Wuori, Quick and Mayor Linke.
ALSO PRESENT: City Attorney Meyers and Clerk/
dm Anistrat`or Pauley.
Motion/Second: Quick/Blanchard to approve the 4. Approval of
n�, 1aa7 minutes as presented. Minutes, n in
IV�JV e11WOa {.VYGuvc+
5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried
Pat Rickaby, 8343 Groveland Road, stating she 5. Requestsand
represented the Mounds View Wetland Preservation
Committee, read a prepared statement voicing three Coe entsFloofrom
major concerns the group has with the preservation
of wetlands in Mounds View.
Mayor Linke clarified for her that Barr Engineering
did not give a conclusiGn at the recent agenda session,
but only an update of the work they have done so far,
and they will be making a formal presentation at the
December 14 meeting.
Councilmember Hankner stated that the intention of the
meeting with Barr Engineering was to get an update of
the progress they have made since they signed the
contract with the City: She added they have not met
in private or had an executive session on this project,
and it is the policy of the Council to make meetings
open to the public.
Mounds view City Council
Regular Meeting.-:0- ----------------------------
Kay Weseman, 7807 Bona Road, noted that Barr Engineering
had commented in their presentation to the Council that
the wetland assessment done by the Audobon Society was
correct in their opinion.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley read the items on the
proposed consent agenda.
Councilmember Quick asked that Schulties Plumbing, Inc.
be removed under Item C.
Motio_ n/S_oond: Wuori/Quick to appInc. under Itemove the tC, and
agenda, minus Schulties Plumbing,
waive the reading of the resolutions.
5 ayes 0 nays
to
ble
of
their- of the lsewernand rwater alicenserfor lSchulties
Plumbing, Inc. to the December 14 Council meeting.
5 ayes 0 nays
-' that Staff is
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reuO:- -.-
recommending that J•im Tobias be appointed a full-
time employee, with a salary increase of $2,000 per
year, retroactive to November 11, 1987.
Motion/Second: Blanchard/Wuori to approve Resolution
No. 22b7, appointing Jim Tobias a full-time employee
and approving a $2,000 per year increase in his wages
retroactive to November 11, 1987.
5 ayes 0 nays
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported Kraus Anderson
has a submarine sandwich shop which would like to
go into the new shopping center, but that the present
City code does not address delicatessens, and he
reviewed a proposed code amendment to cover the
situation, to be Chapter 40.02, Subd. B, (24).
Motion/Second: Hankner/Quick to have the first
reading of Ordinance amending Chapter431, amending the 40 a titledl
code of Mounds View byy
"Zoning", and waive the reading.
4 ayes 1 nay
Councilmember Blanchard voted against the motion,
stating she felt this was a bandaid ordinance, and
was not well thought out.
November 23,'1987,•
Page Two
6. Approval of
Consent Agenda
Motion Carried
Motion Carried ;
Consideration of
7.
Approval. olu
Rslt. No. 2247
Motion Carried'
8. First Reading
of ordinance
No. 431
Motion Carried
November 23, 1987
146unds View City Council.
Page Three
Regular Mgeting
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported the Blaine/Spring
9. Consideration
of Replenish -
Lake Park/Mounds View Fire Depie shttheirrcontingency
ment of Fire
$4,600 from Mounds View to rep
He explained this occurs each year, and the
large
Department
Contingency
fund.
the fund is depleted this year s due
Fund
reason
part to a 31% increase in calls this past year.
kt rove
thehamount
rep le of4the contingencyfundpin
Fire Department.
of $4,600 for the
Motion Carried
5 ayes 0 nays
Councilmember Quick reported he had had contact with
departeand they
another volunteer fire
, and P it was dueelargely
experiencing the same year.
of grass fires this p Y
to the number
reported the City had
Clerk/Administrator Pauley rep i
10. Authorization --'-,
of Placement OZ
received a petition for a security light n
recommendatlaced
Security Light
i; oveldnd Park, and it is the
to have helight plat on
in Groveland
park and Up
Park and Rec Director wires
wires
in the tot lot. Code requiresher has
grading of
pole electric
r,A placed in the ground, and Gopher C ty Aping the
i_
Electrical
submitted a bid for *bU, WLWL �..�
Service
f trenching.
to hParke the placement
oftth security 41ght/at GrovelandWuori
Carried
Motion
5 ayes 0 nays
Councilmember Quick noted there hadbeensecurithe
the placement
lighting in the park prior to
tennis court.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reviewed his memo
11. Consideration
of Staff Memo
November 19 to the Council regarding
abandonment of the
Regarding Chang
-
tion of the sanitary sewer and
County Road I, in connection with
Order on Pro
j ect 87-4
lift station on experienced
problemsial
Project 87-4, an ohetreviewedfill mther d the
with the sinking
manhole.
He explained it was imperative to comm..nce wor:c
feterdelays
immediately to avoid any
comp collapseioftthe line,
project and to avoid.a
and they negotiated with the contractor for a time
$17,000,e and
and materials contract not oto f exceed
approval orderfthe
requested Council
work.
Mounds View City Council
.Regular Meeting ,
-------r._-'--5------------------------ ..
Motion/Second: Hankner/Quick to approve the recommen-
dat ons made in the November 19 memo regarding a
change order on Mounds View Project 87-4, County Road
I Sanitary Sewer Reconstruction.
5 ayes 0 nays
Attorney Mevers had no report.
Councilmember Hankner reported she would not be at
the December 14 meeting, as she would be on
vacation.
Councilmember Hankner reported the residents from
around Silver View Park had met with the Forester
to discuss plantings that would go around Silver
View Pond, and they seemed pleased with what was
proposed. She stated the work should be done in
the spring.
Councilmember Hankner stated she had also talked
to the Forester about some trees that appear to be
dying of oak wilt, and while the test results are
negative at I.his time, he will keep a close watch
on them.
November 23i 1987
Page Four
---------------------
Motion Carried
12. Report of
Attorney
13. Reports of
Councilmembers:
Councilmember
Hankner
Councilmember Hankner reported she had attended the design
evening at Pinewood School on November 18 for their new
playground. She stated that she hopes the City can be an
active participant in the project.
Councilmember Hankner reported she had been given a notice from
the Mounds View Wetlands Preservation Committee, and that while
she knows it was sent out be well-meaning people, some points
need to be clarified or corrected. She added that all meetings on
this subject have been public and open to residents and concerned
citizens, and the Council has spent approximately 9 hours in
public heaL�ngs or citizen informational meetings. She proceeded
to point out corrections. One correction is a statement regarding
an upgrade project of the storm sewer system. She stated that the
Council ik, not at this time undertaking a major project and that
in meetings with citizens who are interested in such improvements
the Council informed residents of how to proceed toward any sLorm
water management improvements. She reviewed briefly some of the
recommendations made by the John Johnson study, regarding the storm
sewer project proposed in 1978, and the cost which was projected
to be $2-4 million, plus land acquisition.
Councilmember Hankner clarified the date at which
action will be taken by the Council, on December 14,
and she stated she regrets si,e will not be at that
meeting to vote on the issue. She also explained
the notification orQcedure the City uses for
L..
Mounds View City Council November 23, 19.87
Regular Meeting Page Five
----------------------
-----------------
^^ informing residents of issues such as this. She
1, added that it is important that facts be stated
accurately and she quoted a section from the notice
she had received which she felt gave inaccurate
information.
Councilmember Blanchard had no report. Councilmember
Blanchard
Councilmember Wuori had no report. Councilmember
Wuori
Councilmember Quick had no report. Councilmember
Quick
Mayor Links reported he had attended design day at Mayor Links
Pinewood Elementary and this is an opportunity for
people to volunteer their time, money, materials
or anything else to make this a viable project. He
stated a sign-up sheet will be available at City
Hall.
Motion/Second: Linke/Blanchard to remove proposed
Resolut3.e o. 2263 from the table.
4 ayes 1 nay Motion Carried
Councihmember Hankner voted against the motion.
She stated that her reason is tha- no public notice
indicated that such an important item was going to be
discussed.
;Mayor Linke stated the proposed resolution would
'hopefully qet the project off dead center, and he
read the proposed resolution. He stated he has
discussed the. proposed resolution with the other
mayors involved, and has not had any negative
feedback from them.
i
Motion/Second: Linke/Wuori to approve Resolution
No. 2263.
3 ayes 2 nays Motion Carried
CounciLuembers Quick and Hankner voted against the
motion.
She would like -to see a forum for all the Councilmembers to put
together a resolution th.:.t they all agree on. She added they
need to lobby Mounds View's position before trying to get every-
one to support it.
Mounds View City Council I
Regular Meeting
---------=-----------------------
November 23,'1987
Page Six
------------ '------ ------
n
Councilmember Hankner stated she has spoken with
other mayors, and she would like to see a forum for
all the Councilmembers to put together a resolution
that they all agree on. She added they need to
lobby Mounds View's position before trying to get
everyone to support it.
Mayor Links stated there is a meeting scheduled at
the New Brighton City Hall at 7 PM on November 24,
sponsored by Commissioners McCarty and Salverda, to
discuss the library issue.
Duane McCarty gave an update to the Council of where
the issue is currently, stating he feels the the
discussion is down to one issue, of what will become
of the Roseville facility.
Councilmember Hankner stated this item was not on
the agenda for this evening, and she felt it should
have been postponed, to allow for public input.
Councilmember Blanchard stated she was in favor of
acting on the resolution, as this gives the CouIity
direction from the City. She added it is not
written in stone but it gives the library board
something to work with.
.Councilmember Quick stated he agreed with Council -
member Hankner's comments, the the item was not
`listed on the agenda, and he would like to get
:together with the Council's Prom the northern
'suburbs to discuss the options and come to a
.mutual agreement.
Councilmember Wuori stated she felt this was a
direction for the City �60 go, and they should
(continue their efforts for action by the library
board.
Councilmember Hankner stated she was not necessarily
in opposition to the resolution, but she felt
(strongly the item should be listed on the agenda, and
,I•he issue should be discussed with the other cities,
before action is taken.
Councilmember Quick stated he is 100 percent behind
the library, but that he is just opposed to the
mechanics of this resolution.
Q.111
November 23, 1987
- 'Mounds View City Council Page Seven
Regular Meeting ----"---""""--
--------------------------
-
(Commissioner McCarty stated the county be maskedore the
cities to give them direction, but they ar
an
willing to listen to recommendations, and he asked
what the City's recommendation is for funding the
operating costs and what that total cost would be.
Mayor Linke stated the Council does not have those
figures, but this resolution provides a starting point
so that those calculations can needed and h
occur by the county
ee
board. Be added a starting point
feels the City has provided one.
Councilmember Hankner stated she favors a good library
system; and she.is in support of having one in Mounds
View, but she still feels there are a number of issues
to be worked out with the other north suburban cities.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported the bids were 14.
Mounds
Clerk/ of
opened for the Fublic improvements for the
formal recommendation will
Administrator
View Business Park, and a
the December 14 meeting. He added the bids
be made at
to be quite a bit lower than was estimated.
appear
41
ephad received
Clerk/Ad,-ninistrator Pauley reported he
a call from Jim Senden, regarding to
they have agreed
Harstad Co. development, and
deadline from December 7 to December 14,
extend the
and they will be following that up with a written
confirmation.
Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported the Barr Engineer-
December 1, and an
ing report is due November 30 or
be made at the December 7
informal presentation will
formal presentation is scheduled
agenda session, and a
for December 14.
Kay Weseman stated she was concerned with thetextension
she appreciated amount
of the time constraints, and
the Council has spent so far, but she is
of time
concerned with the votc on December 14 since one of the
will not be present
wetland advocates on the Council
to vote at that time.
Mayor Linke explained the action has been moved back
be cable cast and minutes
to December 14 so that it can
will be taken.
Councilmember Hankner noted this was the first
broadcast of the
anniversary of the first live
City Council meetings.
Mounds View City Council November 23, 1987
Re u lar Meetin Pa a Fi ht
Mayor Linke adjourned the meeting at 8:09 PM. 15. Adjournment
Res �ctfully submied,
Do ald F. Pauley�
Clerk/Administrator
s@