Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packets - 1988/03/07CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW CITY COUNCIL AGENDA SESSION MARCH 7, 1988 7:00 P.M. Ap 1. Fourth Quarter 1987 Department Head Report Finance Director Brager 2. Consideration of the Draft Community Survey 3. Consideration of the Contract with Decision Resources for the Community Survey 4. Consideration of Site Plan Changes for Mounds View Business Park 8:00 P.M. 5. Joint Meeting with Ramsey County Library Board to Discuss Site Selection for Branch Library 6. Consideration of Salary Administration and Performance Review Program 7. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding 1988 Salary Structure 8. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding Snowmobile Regulations 9. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding Council Chambers Carpeting 10. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding Emergency Procedures Manual 11. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding Fire Department Request for Funds 12. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding North Suburban Cable Commission 1988 Contribution 13. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding S.e. 1765 (Reichgott) Comparable Worth Law 14. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding Portable Restrocm Facility. Bids 15. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding Purchase of Playground Equipment (Hillview Park) 16. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding Policy for Use of Outdoor Park Facilities �. 17. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding Silver View Pond Pathway 18. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding Grant for Recreation Program 19. Consideration of Noise Ordinance Date Approved: 2-22-88 A PP DINGS OF THE CITY COUNCILED �'���1� PROCEEDINGS OF MOUNDS VIEW ` RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA 1 Regular Meeting , February 8, 1988 Mounds View City Hall' 2401 Hwy. 10, Mounds View, MN 55112 The Mounds V1. Call to iew City Council was called to order by Order Mayer Linke at 7:04 PM on Monday, February 8, 1988. 2, Pledge of The Pledge of Allegiance was said. Allegiance_' MEMBERS PRESENT: Counci members Wuori, Quick, Hankner, 3. Roll Call and May Councilmember Blanchard was noted as absent. ALSO PRESENT: City Attorney Meyers and Clerk/ Administrator Pauley. Motion/Second:9. App Wuori/Hankner to approve the January rova Minutes: of 25, 1988 minutes as presented. January 25 and'.-: February 1, 4 ayes 0 nays 1988 Notion Carried';. l,tlg8- 8 minutes ofntherannual HumanpRightshcommission meeting as presented. Motion Carried` 4 ayes 0 nays = There were no residents requests or comments from the 5' Requestssand floor. Comments from the Floor Councilmember Hankner noted the number of public hearings 6. Approval of scheduled for February 22 and asked if it was realistic Consent Agenda have that number, as they could not predict how long Wch would run, and some might be controversial. Mounds View City Council February 8, 1988 Regular Meeting Page Two --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Clerk/Administrator Pauley stated that if they run into problems with the hearings lasting too long, they could be rescheduled. It was the consensus of the Council to leave the hear- ings as scheduled for February 22. Motion/Second: Hankner/Quick to approve the consent agenda as presented. 4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carrie Clerk/Administrator Pauley read the items on the consent agenda. Police Chief Ramacher reported he would have detailed 7. Fourth Quarts: yearly statics ready to Present to the Council within 1987 Departure: the next week, and he reviewed the crime statistics Head Reports: for 1987 versus 1986 and 1986, and presented overhead projections of the data. He reported that overall, the crime rate is down over previous years. Park Director Saarion reviewed the fourth quarter activities of the Park, Recreation and Forestry departments. She reported the fourth quarter is usually quieter than the rest, due to the schools] being tied up anu not available for the City to use. She also reviewed the year end summary from the Forester and presented an overhead projection, showing the tree loss for the year and the reasons why. Clerk/Administrator Paulev reviewed the intent of S. Consideration proposed Resolution No. 2,74 For. the .realign..= ': of of ResolutionX Cvunty Road H. No. 2274 Motion/Second: Hankner/Wuori to approve Resolution No. 2274, f.equesting legislative support for the realignment of Old Highway 8, and waive the reading. 4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried; Clerk/Administrator Pauley explained the proposed plan has been in the works for many years, and it will be the early 1)90's before the actual work would be done, and he also discussed the proposed county trail system that is being proposed for that area. Clerk/Administrator Pauley explained that during the 9. Authorization 1987 legislative session major revisions were adopted to Purcha regarding election laws, and these changes have OPTECH II; necessitated increased capacity for counting ballots. Election System lovnds View City Council February 81 1988 Regular Meeting Page Three ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- * further explained that mounds View's equipment was not recertified for modification, requiring the City to find other equipment. tie added that the punch card system is on itt way out, and optical scanning equipment would be the best recommendation, and the proposed system uses paper ballots which are electronically tabulated in less than ten seconds. Clerk/Administrator ^auley reported two companies had been contacted who manufacture the equipment, and only one responded with a quote. He added this expense was not budgeted for and would have to come from the undesignated funds account, and he explained what that account is. Cooncilmember Ha.`.ner stated she had had an opportunity` to try the machine and found it very simple to use and she war :T-ressed w�.,h it. She asked whether they could be pat out before the election, to allow residents time to familiarize themselves with the equipment. Clerk/Administrator Pauley replied the City is required to have a public information. program 60 days before the election, and they are planning on covering it in the next City newsletter, via video tape, public meetings d will have one on display at City Hall. He added ay will also request coverage in the New Brighton Bulletin, and Minneapolis and St. Paul papers. Motion/Second: Hankner/Quick to approve the purchase of the OPTECH III-P election system from Business Records Corporation at a cost of $20,110 per the proposal dated January 20, 1988, to be funded from the City's undesignated fund balance. 9 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried:' Clerk/Administrator Pauley explained the proposed 10. Consideration increase would be a three percent wage adjustment for of Resolution all non -union employees of the City, with a $10 per No. 2289 month increase in the City's portion of Group HedlLh coverage. He added he will be presenting the merit recommendations to the Council shortly. Motion/Second: Quick/wuori to approve Resolution No. 2289, establishing salaries and benefits effective January 1, 1988, and waive the reading. 9 ayes 0 nays Notion Carried L., Mounds View City Council Regular Meeting ------------------------ Attorney Meyers reported that Amoco oil has brought suit against the City to compel the issuance of a conditional use permit for the construction of a gas station at the intersection of Silver Lake Road and Highway 10, which the City had earlier denied. lie reported there had been a hearing on February 5 for a summary judgement, at which time the City argued it's case, and it is now under the advisement of the judge. Attorney Meyers reported Williams Pipeline Company is preparing a motion to prohibit the City from using the National Transportation Safety Board report in their lawsuit against Williams, and they will be going to court to get the issue resolved, and he reviewed the status of the lawsuit. Councilmember Wuori had no report. CouncilmemI:,er Qu_,;k had no report. Councilmember Hankner reported she had received a letter from a resident complaining about pornography being shown on cable tv, and she asked what controls the City has over what is broadcast on the air. Clerk/Administrator Pauley explained Staff is already strking legate a? 'se from the cab'-'s counsel, and a report should oe ready within the next few days. He explained the only way this broadcast, which is on channel 34, can be received in the home is by specifically requesting and paying to view it. He added there is a lock -out box on each television to lock that particular channel out, if the owner wishes to do so, or the cable company can come out and prevent the station from even coming into the home. February.8, 1988 Page Four ----------------- 11. Report of Attorney 12. Reports of Councilmembers, Councilmember' Wuori Councilmember Quick Councilmen)Zler Hankner Mayor Linke reported the Pinewood playground group would Mayor Linke be sponsoring a spaghetti dinner fund-raiser at Edgewood Ccmmvnity Canter on Wednesday, February 24 from 4-7 PM, at which time a raffle will also be conducted, and he encouraged people to purchase tickets. Mayor Linke reported on the Governor's Safety conferencr., sponsored by the MN Department of Public Safety, scheduled for March 10 and 11. wl Clerk/Administrator Pauley reviewed the determination 13. Report o of MnDOT regarding the ponding for Everest Develcpment, Clerk/ Administrator and that in view of the need for additional ponding area, it will be necessary for the City Council to amend their Mounds View City Council February 8, 1988 Regular Meeting Page Five -------------------- ------------------------------------------------------- -� "iginal approval of condemnation authorize the con- de.nnation of an additional 15,409 square feet and the payment of an additional $23,000, for a total of $99,000 for the land. ?otion/Second: Quick/Har.'.cner to amend the original ;yz` authorization for condemnation of the Robert Waste property to include an additional 15,409 square feet at a market value of $23,000. 4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported Staff has completed the arrangements for the wetland.training session with Barr Engineering, to be held on Saturday, February 27 in the Council chambers. He reported it would be a joint meeting with the Planning Commission and would be video taped. Motion/Second: Hankner/Wuori to schedule a special meeting with the Planning Commission for the wetland training session for 9 AM, Saturday, February 27, 1988 in the Council Chambers, and to request Staff to make the preparations for a video tape of the session. Cayes 0 nays Clerk/Administrator Pauley reviewed the February 8 memo from Finance Director Brager regarding the interviewing and filling of the accounting clerk's position. He stated Staff would strongly recommend the hiring of Mrs. Hickok due to her successful interview and the experience she would bring with her as a customer support representative with Computoservice, Inc. Motion/Second: Hankner/Wuori to approve the hiring of Kathleen Hickok, at a dace to be negotiated by the Finance Director, at a starting salary of $9 per hour, with increases of $0.25 per hour after receiving a rating of satisfactory on performance reviews after completion of three and six months of service. 4 ayes 0 nays Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported Ramsey County will be doing an overlay on Silver Lake Road this summer, and there is a problem with the sanitary sewer and sinking of the mad, between Woodcrest and Woodale. He added they need to repair the pipe but first need to know what the soil is like, and' uld have to do a soil boring and compaction testing. Motion/Second: Quick/Hankner to authorize Short, Elliott, Hendrickson to do the preliminary feasibility study and report for the repair of the sanitary sewer line on Silver Lake Road, with the cost of the report Motion Carried_.:. Motion Carried Mounds View City Council - Regular Meeting February 8, 1988 ------------------------ --------------------------- Page Six °.; not to exceed $10,000 and to come from the sewer fund. 4 ayes r nays Motion Carrisd_y Councillnember Quick stated he was concerned with good money being thrown after bad, as the road is over a bog and could continue to settle. Clerk/Administrator Pauley replied that preliminary studies will determine " how much the road has settled and whether it will settle further. Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported he had received a letter from the '~ business agent for the Teamsters 320, that they have reached a tentative ,a agreement on the City's offer of a 3 percent salary increase, c and he stated he would be presenting it to the Council at the '1 next agenda session. ri Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported they have received copies of the draft for the building program for the Mounds View community library, and the County Library Board will be meetinq on February 22 and they would like input from the City before that time. Mayor Linke asked if a motion had been made for the joint School board/City Council meeting to be held on February 11. Motion/Second: Linke/Quick that the City Council will meet wTt e Mounds View School. Board at 7:30 PM on Thursday, February 11, 1988 at Pinewood School. 9 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Mayor Linke cdjourned the meeting at 8:38 PM. J� 14. Adjournment es ectful m ted, s . PAleyl v n uh` PROCEEDINGTHE CTY UNCT PROVED i RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA Regular Meeting February 22, 1988 Mounds View City Hall 2401 Hwy. 10, Mounds View, Md 55112 ------------------------------------------- The Mounds vieA.+ City Council was called to order by 1. Call to Mayor Linke at 7:02 PM on Monday, February 22, 1988. Order The Pledge of Allegiance was said. MEMBERS PRESENT: Councilmembers Wuori, Quick, Blanchard, Hankner and Mayor Linke. ALSO PRESENT: Attorney Harney, Clerk/Administrator Pauley and City Planner Herman. Mayor Linke stated that due to technical problems, the Council meeting would not be broadcast this evening. "Motion/Second: Wuori/Quick to approve the February 8, 1988 minutes as presented. 4 ayes 0 nays 1 abstain Councilmember Blanchard abstained from the vote as she had not peen present at the February 8 meeting. Mary Bradley, Co -Chairman of the Pinewood Playground project, brought the Coueicil up to date on the fund raising activities for the playground, and upcoming activities, including a spaghetti dinner on February 24, and penny counting day on March 5, beginning at 8 AM at Irondale High School. She stated that if they are able to cover the complete gym floor in pennies, it would amount to approximately $13,000 'ollars. -.ie added local merchants have been very supportive, and they have raised $14,000 to date, which along with t.ie $6,000 that was set aside in 1987, will help them to reach their goal. I 0 . 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Roll Call 4. Approval of :minutes: February 6, 1988 Motion Carried 5. Residents Requests and Comments from Lh, z iuur Mounds View City Council Regular Meeting ------------------- Mayor Links closed the regular meeting and opened the first public hearing at 7:10 PN Clerk/Administrator Pauley explained that during the 1987 Legislative session, the State statute was amended for the filings for local elective offices. He added the Charter Commission has reviewed the proposed .inance and recommends adoption by the City Council. ,.mayor Linke closed the public hearing and reopened the regular meeting at 7:12 PM. February 22, 1988 Page Two ------------------ 6. Public He�g,` Ordinance ..... 435 Amending Chapter 4, 3 Section 4.32 of the Home Rule Charter Motion/Second: Quick/Blanchard to have the first reading 7. let Reading of Ordinance No. 435, amending Chapter 4, Section 4.02 of Ordinance of the Home Rule Charter of the City of Mounds View, and No. 435 waive the reading. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Mayor Linke closed the regular meeting and opened the 8. Public Hearing seconc _ jlic hearing at 7:13 PM. Designation of Municipal " Planner Herman presented an overhead sketch of the Dvlpt. Distric area and reviewed the reasoning for designation of No. 3 and the municipal development district plan and the tax Adoption "1 increment financing plans. She added the Planning Development Commission had passed a resolution on February 17, District Plan supporting the tax increment plan for this area. and Program Pat Rickaby, 8343 Groveland Road, stated she is opposed to tax increment financing, and as in the words of one Planning Commissioner, she feels it is corporate welfare on the backs or the residents. She addPA she is opposed to this proposal based on the wetland that would be destroyed on the property, and she feels there would be a good deal of impact on the environment and wetland in the area. mayor Linke clarified that tnere is no development proposed at this point. Planner Herman stated there is no development agreement or approval of a project for this prop-^rty, and that a budget has been proposed only for the purpose o- receiving tax increment financing. Sandy Krough, 7827 Bona Road, asked what tax increment financing is. Mayor Linke explained it is a process of using future cax dollars, and the developer pays for it rather than the residents. He added the Council will not approve anything longer than 15 years. February 22, 1988 Mounds View City Council f fI BE- 0_ Page Three Regular Meeting t �1 ______________________ erk/Administrator Pauley further explained the tax. crement financing process. - Kathy Ayaz, 7751 Bona Road, quest;ioned whether any money is received unless the project goes through, and she stated she feels this puts a flag out to developers, that the City is willing to have their developments. Clerk/Administrator Pauley replied that financing is not received unless a project does go through. Councilmember ::ankner clarified that if development does not occur within a given time, it becomes void and the process must be started over again. Clerk/Administrator Pauley explained Mr. Miller owns 77 acres, and he would only be able to develop 33 acres, due to the wetlands. He added there is no DNR wetland designation but rather a municipal lesignation. Mayor Linke closed the public hearing and reopened the regular meeting at 7r27 PM. Linke closed the regular meeting and opened the 9' ofsDeveleoment. Mayor Chird public hearing at 7:27 PM. District No. 2`� Planner Herman presented an overhead map of the area in the Council and Adoption of Development, question, stating that the proposal before increment plan for the District Plan at this time is to develop a tax Planning Commission had met and Development, area. She reported that the denied a resolution to approve the Pro ram g on February 17 and of the tax increment plan to the Comp Plan, and consistency as they felt this was not a good plan for that area, they did plan there,comp they did not want a commercial feel it was in keeping with theand with the not spirit and intent in particular. Councilmember Lvuori added Commission a d hthat nthe expressea cullu--, ---�- telanninwelfage the possibility of the State dizing businesses, and itself on tax increment financing. reversing the Mayor Linke stated the Planning Commission was to decideif this was a viable project, and not philosophical aspects of it. was spbased Planner Herman explained their denial iritaon intent. inconsistency with the Comp on ouncilmember Hankner stated she is concerned over the she feels it is very business climate in the State and are ways municipalities much a local issue, and tl,are businesses, with tax increment finaning can attract new She added that everyone has a philosophical being one. view on that issue. Mounds View City Councili �i February 22, 1988 Regular Meeting UNA � rt 8 ���rPage -Four -------------^----------------------------�-'°-�--`- -�---------------'----- Mrs. Rickaby stated she had attended the February 17 Planning Commission meeting and she reviewed what she felt were the reasons they denied the resolution. She added she is personally against corporate welfare and is opposed to this proposal, especially since there are wetlands in the area. Mayor Linke closed the public hearing and reopened the regular meeting at 7:35 PM. Mayor Linke closed the regular meeting and opened the 10. and fourth public hearing at 7:35 PM. Revision anion to be Known as the Clerk/Administrator Pauley explained the Charter requires Municipal Code the recodification of Mounds View ordinance-v every other of Mounds View year, and it is now time for this to be done. He added some major rewrites will be handled separately from this. Mayor Linke closed the public hearing and reopened the regular meeting at 7:37 PM. Mayor Linke closed the regular meeting and opened the 11. Request for fifth public hearing at 7:37 PM. Rezoning Everst Dv , Planner Herman presented an overhead of the area, is an administrative procedure, to Mounds Vi eb Business Park, stating that this rezone the Everest Development, Mounds View Business from I-1 and Park, from I-1, Industrial and B-3, Highway Business, B-3 to a PUD to a PUD, or Planned Unit Development. She stated a PUD classification would more accurately define the development that is actually occuring, and she defined what a PUD is. Mayor Linke further clarified the PUD process. ... _,.�. n.n7Pv PvnlwinPA this allows the City to review developments and approve those that are consisteat with individual zoning code sections for the development that is occuring. He added that the development is looked at as a whole, rather than piece by piece. Jim Peron, 2288 Highway 10, asked what the building is that is being constructed at this time. Mayor Link., replied it is a 105,000 s.f. office warehouse, which will be occupied by Clinch -On, a company which is presently located in New Brighton. He added that a 350,000 s.f. building will be start..d this spring for a group called Transilealth, which is presently located in Eagan. Mounds View City Council February 22, 1988 Regular Meeting --Page Five = / ------------------------- ---- ---------------- � unidentified resident 3 �-�if o. - e ucking regulations would change for the area. Mayor Linke replied they would not. Councilmember Hankner added they must still follow the development agreement requirements. Mayor Linke closed the public hearing and reopened the regular meeting at 7:44 PM. Mayor Linke closed the regular meeting and opened the 12. Public Hearing,: sixth public hearing at 7:44 PM. Request for Conditional Planner Herman presented an overhead of the site plan Use Permit for... for the proposed metal storage building to be placed on Metropolitan the property by the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission. Waste Control She explained that because i` is R-1 zoning, a conditional Commission, use permit is zaquired, and she reviewed the contingencies 2345 County to be included, that approval be received from the Rice Road H. Creek Watershed District, that tree and shrub maintenance and replacement be required on site, and no outside storage will exist after the erection of the building. Mayor Linke closed the public hearing and reopened the regular meeting at 7:47 PM. Clerk/Administrator Pauley read the items on the proposed 13. ApprovConsenalof consent agenda. Agenda` Motion/Second: Quick/Hankner to approve the consent agenda, as presented, and waive the reading of the resolutions. Motion Carried 5 ayes 0 nass motinn/Aarond: Blanchard/Hankner to approve Resolution 14. Consideration'. No. 2294, approving designation of City Development of Resolution District No. 3, and establishment of a Tax Increment No. 2294 Financing District No. 3 located within city development District No. 3, and approve and adopt the Development Program and Tax Increment Financing Plan related thereto, and waive the reading. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Mounds View City Council �f_ P �^e ° February 22, 1988g Regular Meeting 'z �IJ Page Six ----------------------------------------------=-- -------------------------- Clerk/Administrator Pauley read from Minnesota Statute 15. Considerap�n 469.174 regarding various types of districts which can of Prelim ry be created, and he explained the agreement before the Agreement with. Council stipulates that Mr. Miller would compensate the John Miller City for any losses or expenses occurred if he does not proceed with development within the three year time limitation. Motion/Second: Quick/Hankner to authorize Staff to negotiate and to approve as to form the preliminary agreement with John Miller, and bring back to the Council for approval in three to four weeks. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried': Planner Herman reported the City had received a letter 16. Consideration. - from George Winiecki regarding his thoughts and concerns of Resolution on establishing a tax increment district. No. 2293 Motion/Second: Wuori/Quick to approve Resolu�ion No. >; «94, establishing Tax Increment Financing District @2 located Y'thin the City Development District No. 1, and approve and a4opt• the Tax Increment Financing Plan relating thereto, and waive the reading. 4 ayes 1 nay Motion Cap", de ; Councilmember Hankrer voted against the motion, stating she felt the Council should seriously consider what the Planning Commission has advised. Councilmember Blanchard stated that she feels by making a tax increment district, the City will have a little better handle on what will go in there. Councilmember Wuori stated they are already seeing parts of this area being nibbled away at, and she feels an overall plan would be much better and more appealing. Mayor Linke ".atea he agreed with the comments made, and this is a very visable portion of Mounds View, in a high traffic area, and he is concerned with having a hodge-podge development. He added he would prefer to see offices developed, and this process would help the area to develop as an entity. Councilmember Quick stated he felt they must plan for the future, and it is better to look to the future and broaden the tax base. Mounds View City February Regula---------- Council-- � --- Page -- ------even-,-1988.fU"APPPOW-V "otionlSecond: Hankner/Wuori to approve the first read- 17. First Reading:' "Ing of Ordinance No. 436, adopting the revision and of Ordinance recodification of Mounds View Ordinances to be known as No. 436 the "Municipal Code of Mounds View", and waive the reading. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried'' Clerk/Administrator Pauley explained the proposed 18. First Reading ordinance would accept the rezoning of the Mounds View of Ordinance Business Park site from I-1 and B-3 to PUD. No. 437 Motion/Second, Hankner/BlancharC to have the first reading of Ordinance No. 437, amending the Municipal Code of Mounds View by amending Chapter 41, entitled "Specific Rezonings", and waive the reading. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Motion/Second: Hankner/Wuori to adopt Resolution No. 2292, as amended, approving a conditional use permit to construct a public facility in an R-1 district for the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission at 2345 County Road H, and waive the reading. r ayes 0 nays There was discussion on the amendment to the resolution, with the Council agreeing that it should contain a fourth contingency, for maintaining the external appearance of the fencing and building. 19. Consideration cf Resolution No. 2292 Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported that after several 20 months of negotiations an agreement has been reached with Teamsters Local 320, and he briefly reviewed the settle - merits made and asked Council approval, Motion/Second: Quick/Hankner to approve Resolution No. 2251, apprcving the 1989 labor agreement between the City of Mounds View and Teamster's Local 320, and waive the reading. 5 ayes 0 nays Clerk/Administrator Pauley updated the Council on the status cf the application from Bob Waste for a liquor license transfer, stating that Mr. Waste does not want o amend the application or withdraw it, even after being advised that it would be denied as it stands. He explained that Attorney Meyers has confirmed that Chapter 100.06 (2), (f.) prohibits the issuance of a Motion Carried. Consideration of Resolut: -n-1. No. 2291 Motion Carried. 21. Consideration of Application for Liquor License Transfer Mounds View City Council F"4 Regular -----"" Meeting SD ---------------- 11 F February 22, Y Pers Page Pi ht i9B8'. liquor license to an """g""- ------ interest in another similarly having direct or indirect and thus there would be a conflictnin establishment, transf the license from Richard Povlitzki to Roberterrin for POWs. Clerk/Administrator Pauley stated they had discussed the options open to Mr. Waste, but he had told Councilmember Blanchard that rcther than withdraw his request, he would like the on it and deny it Council to take action if necessary. He added that Staff would recommend the application be denied and all fees be refunded, exclusive of investigatiol: costs. Councilmember Quick asked that the item be tabled, to allow Mr. Waste time to think it over. Motion/Second Until March Quick/Blanchard to table any action regularly scheduled meetingetinq, which is the next 5 ayes 0 nays Attorney Karney stated he would be talking to Mr. Waste soon regarding other matters, and would discuss this with him. Attorney Karney had no report. Councilmember Wuori had no report. Councilmember. Quick .,ad no report. Councilmember Blanchard had no report. COu.."cilmember Hankner had no report. Mayor Linke had no report. Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported he had been advised by the Cable Commission that the cable company has not constructed the 2-Net as they had committsystem within the school district, ed to, and the Commission is starting to fine the cable company $500 per day per City until that work is done. Fie add..i that Mounds View's share to this point is $19,000 out of the $25,000 letter of credit Motion 22• Report of Attorney i 23• Reports of Councilmembers.! Councilmember Wuori I Councilmember Quick Councilmember Blanchard Councilmember Hankner Mayor Linke 24. Report of Clerk/ Administra k. Mounds View City CouncilUNPJ P�Ru/� February 22, i988 .Regular Meeting 991f 666��� Page Nine //r�Ihich will be going into escrow. He added they hope 6h to get it worked out and they will continue with the daily fine until the system is in place. Clerk/Administrator Pauley reviewed the memo of Building Inspector Jim Tobias requesting a temporary occupancy permit for T.J.B. Companies at 2704 Highway 10, ; until June 1, 1988. '.Ie explained additional sprinkler testing has to be done, which will be done later in the spring, before.the`final permit can be granted. Motioa/Second: Hankner/Quick to grant a certicicate of occupancy permit for T.J.S. Companies at 2704 Highway 10, until June 1, 1988. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried. Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported they had previously 4 received a briefing on the land use plan that is "ending before the Legislature this session, and he announced a ioiht meeting will be held at the State Office Building at 8:30 AM on February 26, if anyone is interested in attending. Mayor Linke reported the National Arbour Day Foundation has once again designated Mounds View as a tree city, CI°or the seventh year in a row, and he reviewed the riteria for receiving such a designation. Counciimember Hankner verified that the joint City Council and Planning Commission meeting scheduled for February 27 would be cable cast. Clerk/Administrator Pauley stated they would have the problems worked out by that time and would tape the session, for broadcast at a later time. Mayor Linke adjourned the meeting at 8:31 PM. 25. Adjournment Respectfully submitted, Donald F. Pauley Clerk/Administrator ^ MEMO TO: City Council FROM: City Planner Herman DATE: March 2, 1988 ' SUBJECT: COMMUNITY SURVEY Lill After discussions with the City Council and City Department Heads, the consultant has revised the community survey. This draft hopefuly addre_p^s all concerns raised. Staff requests that any changes to be made can be discussed at the March 7 Agenda Session so that the Council can approve the document at the March 14 regular session. This approval will keep the survey process on schedule in order to receive the results in time for the Council's budget and priority setting =- discussions in May. _. The cost of this draft survey is $6,540.00 (89 units). Mr. Brager has stated that there is $6,600.00 set aside for this project. KH/bac ? DECISION RESOURCES, LTD. MOUNDS VIEW CITY SURVEY i� 3125 Dean Court City Services/Policies/Demos r"9 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55414 Daft 2.3 Hello, I'm ---------- of Decision Resources, Ltd., a nationwide polling firm. We're talking with people in Mounds View today and would like to ask you a few questions on a confidential basis. (DO NOT PAUSE) 1. Approximately how long have yo•, lived in Mounds View? LESS THAN TWO YEARS.....1 " 2 - 5 YEARS.............2 h - 10 YEARS ............ 3 11 - 20 YEARS ........... 4 21 - 30 YEARS... ......5 OVER THIRTY YEARS DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ...... 7 - --= 2. In what city and/or state was your immediate prior residence located? 3. Could you tell me one or two reasons why you moved to Mounds View? --------------------------------------------------------- ,,, 4. As things now stand, how long in LESS THAN TWO YEARS ..... I the future do you expect to live 2 - 5 YEARS.............a in Mounds View? 6 - 10 CEARS............ 3 - OVER TEN YEARS .......... 4 REST OF LIFE (VOL.).....5 DON'T KNOW/REFUSED......b .._, 5. How would you rate the quality of EXCELLENT...............1 life in Mounds View -- excellent GOOD.. ...............2 good, only fair, or poor? ONLY FAIR...............3 POOR....................4 DON'T KNOWiREYUc-Eu...... ii - - 6. Over the next five years, do you DECLINE... .... .... 1 expect the quality of life in REMAIN ABOUT THE SAME...2 Mounds View to decline, remain IMPROVE.... ... .....3 about• the same, or improve? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ...... 4 7. What do you like MOST about liv'r.:l in Mounds View? km1---•---------------------------------------------- B. What do you like LEAST about living in Mounds View? 9. Do you think that things in Mounds RIGHT DIRECTION ......... I View are moving in the right di- WRONG TRACK.............2 rection or do you feel they have DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ...... 3 gotten off on the wrong track? -y IF "WRONG TRACK" IN QUESTION #9, ASK: 10. Why do you feel that way? ------------------------ --------------- 11. How much pride do you take in the GREAT DEAL..............I City of Mounds View as a place to QUITE A LOT.............2 live -- a great deal, quite a 1�. S0I,ui..... ..3 -ome, or very little? VERY LITTLE.............4 DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ...... 5 12. If you had the chance, would ynu YES ........... I ......... I like to move awe-., from your NO ....... .... .........2 residence in Mounds View? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED...... 3 "YES" IN QUESTION #129 ASK: 13. Why would you like to move? 14. Where would you like to INTO MINN/ST. PAUL...... I move? WITHIN MOUNDS VIEW ...... 2 ANOTHER SUBURB .......... 3 FURTHER FROM DOWNTOWN ... 4 OUT OF MINNESOTA........ 5 DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ...... 6 15. If you were moving to another city, what factor would be most important to you in selecting your new place of residence? IF RESPONSE GIVEN IN QUESTION #15, ASK: 16, How would you rate Mounds EXCELLENT...............I View on that -- excellent, GOOD.. ..............2 good, only fair, or poor? ONLY FAIR...............3 ' POOR............ ......4 !/ DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ...... 5 2 ® F4 e. What do you like LEAST about living in Mounds View? ------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------- 9. Do you think that things in Mounds RIGHT DIRECTION ......... I View are moving in the right di- WRONG TRACK.............2 rection or do you feel they have DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ...... 3 gotten off on the wrong track? IF "WRONG TRACK" IN QUESTION #91 ASK: 10. Why do you feel that way? ------------------------------------------------------- II. How much pride do you take in the GREAT DEAL..............1 City of Mounds View as a place to QUITE A LOT.............2 live -- a great deal, quite a lot, SOME....................3 some, or very little? VERY LITTLE.............4 DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ...... 5 12. I{ you had the chance, would you YES...............:::::.1 .2 like to move away from your NO ................ residence in Mounds View? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ...... 3 IF "YES" IN QUESTION #12, ASK: 13. Why would you . ke to move? 14. Where would you like to INTO WITHINIMOUNLS VIEW......2 move? ANOTHER SUBURB .......... 3 FURTHER FROM DOWNTOWN ... 4 OUT OF MINNESOTA........ 5 DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ...... 6 15. If you weretui moving you selecting your newplace hwford be tznt of residence? ------------------------------------------------------------ IF RESPONSE GIVEN IN QUESTION #I5, ASK: 16. How would you rate Mounds EXCELLENT...............1 View an that -- excellent, GOOD....................2 goad, only fair, or poor? ONLY FAIR...............3 POOR......... ... .4 DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ...... 5 2 17. If it were needed to maintain FAVOR...................I city services at their current OPPOSE..................2''` level, would you favor er oppose DV'J'T KNOW/rEFUSED...... 3 an increase in city property taxes? Is. Do you consider property taxes in EXCESSIVELY HIGH ........ I Mounds View to be excessively RELATIVELY HIGH ......... 2 high, relatively high, about ABOUT AVERAGE ........... 3 average', or comparatively low? COMPARATIVELY LOW ....... 4 DON'T KNOW 'nEFUSED......5 I would li.ke to read you a list of changes in city services which could be made to avoid increases in taxes or special assessments. For each one, please tell me if you would favor that changes as an alternative to higher taxes, or if you would oppose that change even if it meant higher taxes. FAVOR OPPOSE D.K./REF. 19. Increase the time it takes police to respond to a non - emergency call to save funding more positions? 1 2 3 20. Increase the time it takes to plol•+ city streets after a snow storm? 1 2 3 21. Decrease the amount of funds spent an the maintenance and up..eep of city parks? 1 2 3 22. Reduce the number of street maintenance projects under- taken each year? 1 2 3 23. Reduce the frequency of inspections and response time to complaints about violations of city residential codes? 1 2 3 As you may know, property taxes are divided between the City of Mounds View, Ramsey County, and your local public school disirict. 24. For each dollar of property taxes you pay, about what percentage do you think goes to city govern- ment? UNDER TEN PERCENT ....... I 10% TO 20%..............2 21% TO 30%..............3 31% TO 40%..............4 41% TO 50%..............5 51% TO 60%..............6 61% TO 70%............ ..7 400 OVER SEVENTY PERCENT....B DON'T KNOW/REFUSED..... 9 I would like to read you a list of a few services provided by the MCity or County. For each one, please tell me whether you would rate the quality of the service as excellent, good, only fair, or poor. EXC GOOD ONLY POOR D.K./ FAIR REF. 25. lark Maintenance 1 2 3 4 5 26. Snow Plowing 1 2 3 4 5 27. Police Protection 1 2 3 4 S 28. Fire Protection 1 2 3 4 5 29. City Street Maintenance 1 2 3 4 5 30. Animal Control 1 2 3 4 5 31. Waste and Storm Wot�r Cnnt'. of 1 2 3 4 5 32. Water for Resi- dential U.c 1 2 3 4 5 IF "ONLY FAIR" OR "POOR" IN DUESTIONS #25-32, ASK FOR EACH ONE: 32j. Why did you rate as (only fair/poor)? Let's talk about Muunas View City Government for a few minutes. When many people think about their local government, they think of the elected officials who represent them.... 34. How much do you feel you know GREAT DEAL..............I about the work of the Mayor and FAIR AMOUNT.............2 City Council -- a great deal, vERV LITTLE..............a a fair amount, or very little? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ...... 4 35. From what you know, do you approve STRONGLY APPROVE ........ 1 or disapprove of the job the Mayor SOMEWHAT APPROVE ........ 2 and City Council are doing? (WAIT SOMEWHAT DISAPPROVE ..... 3 FOR RESPONSE) And do you feel STRONGLY DISAPPROVE ..... 4 strongly that way? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ...... 5 4 I mow, 36. Have you or members of this had NOS::••••••:" :" " '.•. 2 F 1 contact with the Mounds View .. City staff during the past year? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ...... 3 37. From what you have seen or heard, XCE600DLLENT:::::: ............I .2 how would you rate the job per- formance of the Mounds View City ONLY FAIR.......... ....3 staff -- excellent, good, only POOR....................4 fair, or poor? DON'T KNOW/AEFUSED...... 5 Do feel that the amount of TOO LITTLE..............I 38. you patrolling in your neigh- .............2 police bonccod i7 too "t".le, about TOOABOMUCH3 ...... 4 ." right, or too much? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED IF "TOO LITTLE" IN QUESTION M38, ASK: 39. Would you favor or appose FAVOR.. .........I a`a ¢ the hiring of more police OPPOSE.••••••• ..... .3 officers to expand patrols, DON'T KNOW/REFUSED..... s3 y, even if it maant an in- crease in property taxes? Let's talk about economic development in Mounds View.... 40. If the City were to attract more development, what kind would you prefer it to be?_ ------------------ Do f=el that the pace of TOO RAPID...............1 _ 41. you and industrial dev.-l- ABOUT RIGHT.............2 " commercial opment in the city has been too NOT FAST ENOUGH .........3 KNOW/REFUSED rapid, about right, or not f...•••4 ast DON'T enough? dilapidated or subfavordretldevelapmen{? areas of e 42. Are there any (IF in which you would particularly "YES," ASK:) What are they? ------------------------------------------------------------ 43. ------------------------------------------------------------ Of the following types of devel- RESIDENTIALTAIL ....ING.........I opment, which ONE would you OFFICE BUILDINGS ........ 3 most favor along the Highway 10 Road I INDUSTRIAL..............5 corridor between County ALL EQUALLY (VOL) and Spring Lake Park. DON'T CARE (VOL)........ (READ CHOICES M1-N4) DON'T KNOW/REFUSED......? 7 r r,%ail shopping area? 44. What is the loca`•icr, your principal ------------------------------------------ 5 45. Overall, about how much of your VIRTUALLY ALL ........... I retail purchases do you make in MOST....................2 Mounds View -- virtually all, SOME.. ... .........3 most, some, or little to none? LITTLE TO NONE .......... 4 DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ...... 5 IF "SOME" OR "LITTLE TO NONE," ASK: 46. Could you tell me one or two reasons why you don't shop more in Mounds View? 47. Have you visited Mounds View City YES .................. ...i Hall during the past twelve NO......................2 months? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED......3 IF "YES" IN QUESTION N47, ASK: For each of the following characteristics, please rate the Mounds `ew City Hall facility or staff as excellent, good, only fair, or poor.... E%C GOOD ONLY POOR D.K./ FAIR REF. 48. Convenience of City Hall hours? 1 2 3 4 5 49. Waiting ! .•e for service? I c^ 3 4 50. Courtesy of the staff? 1 2 3 4 5 51. Efficiency of the staff? 1 2 3 4 5 52. Cleanliness of the building? 1 2 3 4 5 Ramsey County will soon require all residents to separate recy- clables from their trash. The City of Mounds View is currently reviewing alternatives to comply with the county requirement. 53. Do you currently separate recy- YES.....................I clables from the rest of your NO...... ..........2 garbage? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ...... 3 IF "YES" IN QUESTION N53, ASK: 6 Which of the followi.,,g materials do you recycle? YES NO D.K. REF.<'�' 54. Glass? 1 2 55. Newspapers and cardboard? 1 3 4 56. Metal and aluminum? 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 .. IF RECYCLING ANY MATERIALS, ASK: 57. How and where do you recycle them? _ -------------------------------------------- Recycling will start in the Spring. One possible approach to 4 meeting the county requirement would be for the City .to establishr,::•;' a curbside pick-up at each house of separated recyclable materials. Households would be asked to separate recyclables from the rest of their trash and haulers would carry them away, 58. If the City instituted a pick-up VERY LIKELY......... 1 5 system, how likely would you be SOMEWHAT LIKELY ... ......2" `_"�� to use it -- verylikely, , yr some- NOT AT ALL LIKeLY... ,3 . what likely, or not at all likely? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ...... 4,_;_'_ s:t 59, If YOU could save about fifteen YES.......... percent on your garbage hauling NO...., bill by participating in the pro- DON'T KNOW/REFUSED......3' gram, would you do so? �3 60. Do you currently compost your YES. .l waste yard materials? NO ................ DON'T KNOW/REFUSED......3,, IF "YES," ASK: =I 61. What compost site do you use? ------------------------------------------------------- As you may know. sc:cral refuse haulers serve Mounds View. This F arrangement has permitted citizens to choose their own haulers and contract directly with them. But, it has also created significant overlap between the haulers and increased noise and congestion on city streets. 6E. Of the following three proposals, which do you most favor: A. The City contracts with one hauler to serve the entire city. B. The City contracts with a group of haulers, each serving one area of Mounds View exclu- sively. C. The present sl•stem. PROPOSALA..............I PROPOSALB..............2 PROPOSALC.......... .3 DON'T CARE (VOL).... ....4 DON'T KNOW/REFUSED......5 7 Traditionaiiy, the City has provided residents with basic ser- vices, such as poli-e and fire protection, and street mainten- ance. Some cities also provide social services to their resi- dents, such as Chemical Abuse Programs, Counseling, Day Care, and Senior Services. 63. Would you favor or oppose the YES.....................I City of Mounds View expanding NO..... ...........2 its current service provision DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ...... 3 to include social services? 64. In general, do you feel that the SERIUUS PROBLEM ......... I condition and upkeep of city MINOR PROBLEM ........... 2 streets is a serious problem in NO PROBLEM..............3 Mounds View, a minor problem, DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ...... 4 or no problem at all? IF "SERIOUS," IN QUESTION N64, ASK: 65. Why do you feel that way? ----------------------------- 66. Do you feel that the City is too tough, about right, or not tough enough in enforcing the City Code ( regarding residential property maintenance for weed control, outdoor storage, junk cars, animal control, and noise? TOOTOUGH...............I ABOUTRIGHT.............2 NOT TOUGH ENOUGH ........ 3 DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ...... 4 IF "TOO TOUGH" OR "NOT TOUGH ENOUGH" IN QUESTION k66, ASK: 67. Why do you feel that way? 68. How serious do you feel the VERY SERIOUS ............ I problem of storm water manage- NOT TOO SERIOUS ......... 2 mrnL is in Hounds View -- very NOT A PROBLEM ........... 3 serious, not too serious, or DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ...... 4 not a problem at all? Currently, the City uses a system of ponds to control the run-off from storms. 69. Would you favor or oppose the construction of storm water sewers in the city? (WAIT FOR RESPONSE) And dp.you feel strongly that way? STRONGLY FAVOR .......... I FAVOR...................2 OPPOSE........ ........3 STRONGLY OPPOSE ......... 4 DON'T KNOw,REFUSED...... 5 8 If the city were to construct storm sewers, it would require the passage of a bond referendum. 70. How much more would you be willing ...1 E25hIING......:::::::....2 to pay in property taxes to sup- ......•• 3 port construction of storm sewers? 475••••••••• .4 (START WITH RANDOMLY SELECTED CHOICE FROM JI1 - (t7) Let's say 5100.. ........5 " " " " .. 6 would you be willing to pay f--__ 8125.. per year? (MOVE TO NEXT CHOICE $150....................7 KNOW/REFUSED ...... 8 UP OR DOWN/REPEAT) DON'T 71. How would you rate park and rec= ......1 EXCELLENT ......OD ::•.....•2 na! HOLY View - excellent, goodd, only View -- excellent, 9 Y FAIR...............3 fair, or poor? POOR.. •••• ..'4 KNOW/REFUSED ...... 5 DON'T 72. In do you usually spend OUTDOOR ACTIVITIES......1 I general, leisure time in outdoor INDOOR ACTIVITIES .......2 your weather permitting, BOTLEISUR.............114 activities, or indoor activities? NO LEISURE TIME.........4 DON'T KNOW/RE�USED.... ..5 73. Are vo•s more apt to participate UNORGANIZED.............1 in unorganized recreation, such ORGANIZED...............2 x as bicycling, walking, picnics, BOTH EQUALLY .......... ••3 or skating, or in organized NEITHER.................4i recreation, such as team sports? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ...... 5 74. Could you tell me abut how often ALMOST DAILY ............ I you and other members of your SEVERAL TIMES PER WEEK..2 household have used the park and ONCE PER WEEK...........3 recreational facilities in Mounds SEVERAL TIMES PER MONTH.4 View during the pask year, weather ONCE PER MONTH..........5 permitting? (READ CHOICES p1 - NEVERALALLM.E.S. ..........7 07) DON'T KNOW/REFUSED......B IF "ONCE PER WEEK" OR MORE IN QUESTION #74, ASK: 75. What kinds of activities do you engage in? --------------------------------------------------------- IF "SEVERAL TIMES PER YEAR" OR "NOT AT ALL" IN QUESTION N74, ASK: 76. Is there some particular reason why your household does not use the park and recreation system more frequently? --------------------------------------- ---------------- 9 77. In the past year, have you or any YES.....................I membar of your household partici- NO....................1.2 pated in a city -sponsored recre- DON'T KNOW/REFUSED......3 ational program? IF "YES" IN QUESTION #77, ASK: 78. Do you feel that the regis- EXCESSIVELY HIGH ........ I tration fees are excessively COMPARATIVELY HIGH ...... a high, comparatively high, ABOUT AVERAGE.. . ......3 about average, comparatively COMPARATIVELY LOW.....4 low, or very low? VERY LOW .......... .......5 DON'T KNOW/REFUSED...... 6 iF "NO" IN QUESTI^-N #77. ASK: 74. Could you `ell me one or two reasons why you haven't? 80. Would you favor or oppose a bond FAVOR referendum to upgrade and com- ...................1 OPPOSE..................2 plete the Mounds View Park UNDECIDED...............3 _ System? REFUSED ................ 4 Y' ' 81. What is your principal source of information about -City recreational programs and opportunities? c, A ------------------------------------------------------------ a.; 82. Would you favor or oppose the FAVOR ................ City developing and L,•erating .1 OPPOSE .. .... a regulation nine -hole golf .. ......2 DON'T KNOW/REFUSED .... ..3 course? 83. Whether you favor the project YES...........:.........1 --- or not, would you and/or members NO ................... of this household be likely to ..,2 DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ..... .3 use the golf course? 84. Should the city attempt to pre- PRESERVE................1 serve wetlands in Mounds View or ENCOURAGE DEVELOPMENT.2 ..3 should it encourage development BOTH (VOL).............. on t..ose lands? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ...... 4 IF "PRESERVE" IN QUESTION #84, PCV'- 85. Would you favor or oppose a FA11;2R...................1 property tax increase to OPPOSE...... permit the city to purchase .....2 DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ...... 3 the wetlands for preserva- tion? 10 i 86. What is your principal source of information about city ,_t government and its activities? 87. Are you generally satisfied or SATISFIED..............•1 dissati%fled with your level of DISSATISFIED ............ 2 information about city govern- DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ...... 3 ment and its activities? 88. Does your household currently RECEIVE/READ ............ I i 2 receive the "New Brighton RECEIVE/DON'T READ ...... Bulletin"? (IF "YES," ASK:) DON'T RECEIVE ........... 3 Do you generally read that DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ...... 4 newspaper? l� 89. Does your household currently RECEIVE/REAn............ I 2 receive "The Focus"? (IF "YES," RECEIVE/DON'T READ ...... ASK:) Do you generally read DON'T RECEIVE ........... 3 DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ...... 4 that newspaper? i 90. Other than voting, do you feel YES.....................I that if you wanted to, you could NO......................2 have•a say about the way the DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ..... .3 City of Mounds View runs things? 91, Do you recall receiving the YES ....................1 "Moundsview City Newsletter"? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ...... 3 IF "YES" IN QUESTION #91, ASK: -2, Do you or any members of YES.....................I your household regularly read it. DON'T KNOWiREFUSED...... 3 IF "YES" IN QUESTION #92, ASK: 93. Do you tend to keep it K E E F IT A ........... around for later reference TOSS IT.................2 or toss it after you have BOTH/DEPENDS ON ISSUE ... 3 read through it? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ...... 4 94. Are tnere any changes or improvements in the format or the coverage which you would like to see? ------------------------------------------------------- 95. .Does your household currently YES.....................I receive cable television? NO......................2 DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ...... 3 IF :'YES",IN QUESTION #95. ASK: 11 96. City Council Meetings are VERY FREQUENTLY ......... I televised on cable tele- OCCASIONALLY ............ 2 vision. How frequently do NEVER...................3 you watch these broadcasts DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ...... 4 -- very frequently, occa- sionally, or never? IF "VERY FREQUENTLY" OR "OCCASIONALLY" IN QUESTION 096, ASK: 97. Are there any changes or improvements in the broadcasts that you would like to see? Now, just a few more questions for demographic purposes.... 9B. Do you own or rent your present residence? 99. Which of the following best describes your residence? (READ CHOICES) OTHER: OWN.....................) RENT....................2 REFUSED.................3 SINGLE FAN7LY DWFLL..... I APARTMENT...............S TOWNHOUSE/CONDOMINIUM ... 3 MOBILE HOME.............4 OTHER...................5 DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ...... 6 Could you please tell me how many people in each of the foll^wing �✓ age groups live in your household. Let's start oldest to young eat, and be sure to count yourself. 100. Are there any persons over the YES .................... I age of 65 living in this NO.•• •.•.............•.2 residence? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED..... 3 101. Are there any school -aged child- YES .....................) ren living in this household? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ...... 3 102. Are there any pre-schoolers in this i Nelda. -.cc? 103. W`at is your age, please? (READ CATEGORIES) YES.....................I NO..... .. ............ 2 DON'T KNOW/REFUSED.......) 18-24...................1 25-34...................2 35-44...................3 45-54...................4 55-64... ..............5 65 AND OVER.............6 REFUSED.................7 104. What is the occupation of the head of this household? r;. 12 105. What is your present marita'. SINGLE..................I status, please? Are you pre- MARRIED..................2 sently single, married, divorced DIVORCED................34 or widowed? WIDOWED, ............... REFUSED.................5 IF "MARRIED" IN QUESTION #105, :5K: 106. Do both spouses work outside YES.....................1 the home? NO......................2 DON'T KNOW/REFUSED......3 107. Can you tell me approximately BELOW $10,000...........1 what is the level of income for 310,OO1-420,000........ 12 all membera of your household $20,001-S30,000......... 3 before any taxes? Is the total E30,001-$40,000......... 4 a40,001-450,000......... 5 annual income: $50,001-f60,000......... 6 (READ CHOICES #1-N7) 7 OVER $60,000............ DON'T KNOW..............8 REFUSED.................9 S 108. Sex (BY OBSERVATION: DO NOT ASK) MALE.....................I 2 '3 FEMALE.................. Thank you very much for your time. LIST-•-------------------------------- TELEPHONE NUMBER ---------------------- DATE---------------------------------- INTERVIEWER--------------------------- 13 MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: City :lsnner Herman DATE: March 3, 1988 SUBJECT: COMMUNITY SURVEY CONSULTANT'S CONTRACT Attached is a copy of Decision Resources' standard contract for your review. You may want to pty particular attention to Article IV which discusses the disclosure of survey information. It states that, "Client agrees that if it or anyone else acting on its behalf wishes to release in whole or in part to the public by press release, speech, or otherwise, the data or results of the survey or contents of the written report, that client or such other person will first notify DRL in writing, and that there will be also stated in the relea j, speech, or otherwise, that the survey was done by Decision Resources, Limited, of Minneapolis, Minnesota. The City Attorney is also reviewing this contract to ensure that it conforms to Citv policy. KH/bac Attachment AGREEMENT 1. MARBLE Wereas, Decision Resources, Limited, (hereinafter referred to as DRLI offers its services to organizations in the political and private secta•s for the purpose of conducting market research by trirohore sdrvey in ascertain such information as may be requested by its clients, or? khereas,--e(-M-QF}-ollmm___y IE�______, Ihereirafter referred to as CLIENT) wishes to employ DRL for the above stated purposms, Dia. and CLiENI agree to ter following terms, conditions and fees r irning such employment. 11. SEVICES (A.) DAL shall corxluct a survey, the sawale size of which shall be _4co 14otJSeaq, D5 and the number of questions of Which shall be : The survey shall be contained within G?'L4F AiOV�D�YIn(__------- —---- ---. IS.) DRL hill submit the questionnaire for the survey to CLIENT for his opa•oval prior to the ccvmencesent of interviews. The specific details of the survey as to timing, questionnaire content, and population samole to be surveyed (except as otherwise specified In paragraph A) shall be mutually agreed upon by the parties as circumstances way require, In the event the parties fall to agree, CLIENT shall have fine; authority to deterelne the subject utter content of the survey, while DAL - shall have final authority to deterelne the specific warding of questions an the questionnaire and the specific Individuals within the given population to be savoled. DAL shall not be obligated to ask auestions of persons Interviewed in addition to -. thou questions included on the approved questionnaire or to provide data or interpretations with respect to topics issues rot covered by the questionnaire. DAL will proceed . ith a survey only after it receives notice of CLIENT'S approval of the qupstionnalre. I The survey shall be emanced as soon as is practicable following - III approval of the questionnaire by CLIENT, and (2) payment of all fees due to date as required. ID.) W-,, payment of all fees due to date, DAL shall furnish to EVENT a written report of the survey malts including interpretations which say be reasonably drawn therefrom. Ill. FEES CLIENT shall remit to DAL fees In the wants, at the times, and In the manner specified hereunders �4800.cA`G-a- bo QL)eST1CfJ UNITS The TOTAL AVWT of all fees due under this agreement ehall be (po—oQ" j�otJAL FEY gUESnrr; UNIT A&qF-60, TIME FEES ME IA.) `��% of the TOIAL RIOT due under this agreement shall be due at the time CLIENT afrixes his signature hereto. DIAL shall not be obligated to coemance interviews for the survey until the fen called for in this paragraph (A.) has been Paid in full. M) The balance of the TOTAL AMW remaining unpaid shall be due prior to delivery by DAL to CLIENT of the written report required under Section 11, (M. (C.) All fen due W r this agreement shall be payable by ordinary check, except that DAL reserves t,,: right to require payment by cercifid check, after having given CLIENT three days notice of such requirement. IV. PROPRIETARY RIGHTS AND DISCLOSURE The written report required unior Section 11. (0.) shall trn'ne the salt property of CLIENT after payrent to DRL of the TOTAL AMOLWT required In Section Ili. The survey questionnaires +red replies +red all '•flated includinWit but nbotrills Arid lisated advertisingtonforps"O" shall And retain the property of DRL. Dpl Agrees not to divulge or use To anypm'pose' 9 ,'ovlded haever, if the public relations, the inforwatien obtained In the survey without the written consent of CLIENTI P r ' followiPublic the data ng inforr+tiomthe the popularvey tiondirectly from which the saxpleaide was taken, there dIENT oofaobttiiningelsethe interviews, L way eincluding the size and design d the sAnole, and the basis of the data If the wrote is less than the total smPle, the dates an! ttexs when the interviews very conducted, the exact wording of questions asked and brie client's nape. CLIENT agrees ui AotIf here Or anyone else acting on its behalf wishes to release in whole or In part to lye public by Dross release, speech, , the data or results of the survey or contents of the Kitten report, that CLIENT or such other person will first notify FL 1n writing, And that there will be also stated In the release, speech, or otherwise, that the survey was done by DECTSIOV RESIX)RCES, LIMITED, OF MIN.EAPOLIS, MINNESOTA. CLIENT agrees, at all tiwea both during the let's of tails Agreere^t and thereafter, to keeo In confidence all knowledge or inforsation as to the processes, eethxds and techniques of DRL and not to disclose or site known rush knowledge Or infursation to any other person, f6•r, corporation or a'ganizabien, Includirg but not lleited to taspetltors of DAL, except when specifically authorized to to so in writing by DRL. CLIENT fwther ureer- stands and agrees that the Panes and addresses of interviewers used by DRL +rd the napes and/or addresses of persons sarpled are opnfidential aid will not be side available to CLIENT V. EXCLUSION OF UIPWANTIES O.RL agrees to utilize as best efforts to insure the accuracy of any survey by it pursuant to this Pgreerant. However, it is specifically understood and agreed that nothing in this Agreerent, or any survey or written report furnished under Section IT. 10.1, shall or considered as either, a prediction or guarantee of the results of any election or the outcore of any event, and any representations or warranties, express or irplied, to that effect are hereby excluded. In addition, DAL shall not be responsible or liable for any failure by it to conduct any survey or render any written report if such failure results from labor disturbances, tires, floods, wars, riots, civil disturbances and other events beyond the control of DRL. VI. ARBITRATION •1 The parties agree that any dispute arising under this Pareeeent shall be resolved under the rules and prccederes of the Aaerican Arbitration Assoctawion is applicable under Minnesota law And that any such proceedings stall be conducted in Minnesota. VII. LIOUIDATED DA W6ES In the event CLIENT fails to take timely payrent under Section III (B.), DRL shall be entitled to liquidated damages equal to fifteen percent (15%) of the TOTAL AMO:MT due. The parties expressly agree that this provision is in recognition of the fact that DRL's daaages are incapable of precise neasumixent duv to costs ss-.nrated with lost opportunities, generating samples, questionnaire design, Phone facility scheduling, and staff tire. VIII, MOOIFICATIOtS �..n . w...,r...r-,hip unless in rrritinc and signed by the party to be charged. Neither Modificatic.n of rnia ny. K.,:at =. _- -- - ..e parties' waiver of any rights due hie under this Agrement shall have the effect of waiving other or subseque n sty,.. hereunder. U. MISCELLANM IA.) This Agreecent aerges and supersedes all other Aaeesents, verbal aid written, between the parties and rearesents all agreesents between thew and binds their administrators, heirs, successors and assigrs. IS.) Any provision of this AgreeeRnt which nay be held unenforceable shall be severable and the balance of the Pgree,ent enforced. r1 y IC.) CLIENT agrees that It shall rosoly with all laws moecting disclosure of this agreeeaent. -- n1 DSL reserves the right to use the findings from this srnwey in ar+npeus fore is to the specific ecoulatioa aM cliert purposes of aggregate and cooperative analyses to be wade available to other• CLIENTS of PRL or p.blications. In witness whereof, the parties affix their slgnatm•e on this _—_— day of—__—r____—_•� C. DECISIJOtj AESIXMICESI LIMITED CLIENT -�lDEitJT- Ipositionl loositionl 3 MEMO TO • Mayor and City Council FROM: City Planner Herman DATE: March 3, 1988 SUBJECT: SITE PLAN CHANGES FOR MOUNDS VIEW BUSINESS PARK, BUILDING G Attached you will find a letter from Tim Nelson explaining the proposed changes in the site plan for Building G. As you know, Everest Development is proposing to increase the square footage of the building whict. therefore necessitates a reduction in parking spaces of 76 spaces. If the expansion parking was put into use at a future date the difference between the approved plan from the proposed would be 150 spaces (763-613). A second issue raised was the iroposed changes in landscaping. The City ?orester has reviewed the site plan and has requested additional information regarding the boulevard tree plantings. I have told Tim Nelson that the Forester has requested a cross-section drawing of the boulevard area which would show the ^, ponding and tree placement. I expect to receive that early next iv week. The Forester is also in contact with the landscape architect to discuss the species selection. Some changes may occur in that area. The City Engineer has reviewed the change in the ponding for the site and has no problems with it. In fact the change from one to three p9dds has increased the ponding capacity over the original plan. Also attached is d memo the Council previously received from me relayinc what concerns the Planning Commission had after reviewing the proposed changes. KH/bac Attachments EVEREST DEVELOPMENT LTD \1'nO�Au o11111 March 2, 1988 Ms. Kim Herman City Planner City of Mounds View 2401 U.S. Highway 10 Mounds View, MN 55112 DELIVERED BY MESSENGER RE: Mounds View Business Park Building G (Light Industrial Building 2) Dear Kim: Enclosed for your review and comment are ten (10) copies each of revised plans for Building G within Mounds View Business Park, which was described in the approved PUD Con- cept and Development Plans as Light Industrial Building 2. Included are a Site Plan, an Alternate Site Plan, Landscape Plans, Grading/Drainage and Utility Plans. We are proposing to increase the building size and reduce 41 the parking areas of Building G to meet the business needs and circumstances of our prime tenant. Our ability to rt_ " to our prime Tenant's needs and to tailor the building .., its operation will be critical in finalizing the Tenant's commitment to the project and in meeting its long- term expansion needs. Theso plan revisions are also consistrrt with the highest and best use of Building G as bulk distribution center. The changes between the approved development stage plans for this building and our current revised plans are summarized as follows: Is, APPROVED DEVELOPMENT PLAN: Building Footprint: Gross Floor Area, including 15% Mezzanine:. Gross Leaseable Area: Parking: Expansion Parking: 268,000 SF 308,200 SF 277,400 SF 553 stalls or 1.99/1000 SF 763 stalls, or 2.57/1000 SF IY I Iti �.I C'1! •h��•r\JI�•..\1�'��Ilt Ms. Kim Merman March 2, 1988 Page 2 of 3 REVISED PLAN! Building Footprint: 326,592 SF Gross Floor Area, including 10% Mezzanine: 359,251 SF Gross Leaseable Area: 323,326 SF (90% of GFA) Parking: 377 stalls, or 1.16/1000 SF Expansion Parking: 613 stalls, or 1.90/1000 SF (Add 236 stalls per Alternate Site Plan) Our prime tenant intends to occupy approximately 250,000 Fquare feet of the building initially. At maximum utiliza- tion of that space, and full employment, they will need 250 parking stalls. Upon initial occupancy, only 210 stalls will be needed. 1 With 250 of 377 total parking stalls allocated to the prime " tenant, this will leave 127 stalls for the remaining 100,000 square feet of gross building area. This amount of parking should be more than adequate to lease up the remainder of the building to one or more representative bulk distribu- tion/warehouse tenant(s). The total of 377 stalls will also be ample to meet our prime tenant's parking needs if they expand, az projected, to occupy the entire building. In the unlikely event, however, that tenants for this building need a greater amount of parking, we can provide up to 236 additional stalls (613 total) within the paved truck court area on the south side of the building, while still providing ample truck service areas. This expanded parking wituatic i.. dcpiatcd i._ +> _�_ _a _�Y_—__Y_ _�_ _lam .....� +v ..rw �— + .w>: n-+vocu a1..c Y..a 1.0 LCVIOCLL b4uc plan. w We would not anticipate instelling the curbing or striping the parking stalls in this area until and unless tue additional parking was needed. Please note on the landscape plan that we have retained the boulevard trees along the north side of Woodale Drive, ad- jacent to the revised pending area. In resncnse to a concern raised by Dan Boxrud, the City's consulting engineer, we have reviewed the proposed location of these trees in relation to the level of ponding areas to the north along Woodale, and we have determined that the trees are in Ms. Kim Herman March 2 1983 Page 3 of 3 no jeopardy from the fiord eaVprooxorratelyThe 897pond 1 andwater the trees will be at an eleva won of app foot will be planted at about 90311 a full cix (6) difference in elevation. We look forward to discussing these revised dsplans with You and the City Council at the Council Agenda Monday, March 7, 1988. sincerely, EVE 8 �PMENT, LTD. T/moLhy J. Nelson TJN/jgY Enc. cc: Don Pauley, Bill Franke C V 3� fs MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council . FROM: City Planner Herman DATE: February 1, 1988 SUBJECT: EVEREST PROPOSED SITE REVISIONS Tim Nelson, from Everest Development, and I presented the proposed site plan changes to Building G at the January 20th Planning Commission meeting. Issues addressed were the reduction in parking, the reconfiguration of the ponds, and the potential impact to the landscaping. The Planning Coommission was very upset about the possible removal of the boulevard trees along Woodale Drive. The City Forester reviewed the proposal and felt there was adequate room to plant boulevard trees adjacent to the ponding areas, although, the plan he reviewed was a schematic and not the final site iy plan. Tim Nelson will have the proposed landscape on the next submittal. "¢ Some of the Planning Commission members expressed concerns about' the reduction in parking stalls. They felt this reduction C� compromised the negotiation process the City had with Everest during the initial stages of the projeet',s development review. It was stated that the changes in parking seem arbitrary. KH/bac cc: Clerk -Administrator 1910 t1'eef Cwxiy Rawl 3 131 72�, Ra:taiiPe 4;ii uiae,ia 55 �l Q (612) 636-6747 by 9 M yam, NEWS RELEASE N (��Sy 5SIN 2-26-88 f�,- *01 ,t FOR PUBLICATIONC PLEASE POST ow"ov The Ramsey County Public Library Board will hold its next regular meeting on Monday, March 21st beginning at 7:00 P.M. in the conference room of the Library Administrative Offices at the Fairview Community Center, 1910 West County Road B in Roseville. The Library Board will also meet on Monday, March 7th to discuss the recommendations from the architect regarding future library locations. The March 7th meeting will be held at 7:00 P.M. at the Mounds View City Hall, 2401 ` Highway 10. About 8:00 P.M. the Library Board will meet with the City Council to discuss a community library site in Mounds View. On March 14th the Library Board will meet with the Shoreview City Council to discuss a community library site in that city. The joint meeting ..Ill be held at 7:00 P.M. in the Shoreview City He"., 4665 N. Victoria Street. The Friends of the Ramsey County Public Library have invited the Library Board members to participate in an information breakfast at the Fox and Hounds Restaurant, Larpenreur and 35 E, on Wednesday. March 16th at 0 00 A.H. Library facility expansion plans in suburban Ramsey County will be discussed. All meetings of the Ramey County Public Library Board are open to the public. For more information contact: Norman Vinnes or Lucille Stiever Ramsey County Public Library 636-6747 jW C �` Ra twes� C=ta ?,4& 2ialalu Adw,w!W" Clikm a 1910 wee! C=dq Road 3 317� J Ra+aak ri(i coda 55113 ,n1L T 3• ..s"�.a..r 636-5747 ZZ LIBRARY FACILITI ' PLANNING NELYSLETT A ,0 �v March 1, 1988 E�gl(!^i ���• No. 2 The following information is provided for those who may be interested in learning about the progress being made toward improving public library facilities for the people of suburban Ramsey County. Input into the decision making process by officials and other citizens is encouraged. The Library or Library Board members may be contacted at the above address or phone number. Norman Vinnes, Director Ramsey County Public Library Library Board to Meet with Mounds View and Shoreview Councils The Library Board will meet with the Mounds View City Council on Monday, March 7th to discuss two potential library sites near Highway 10 and Long Lake Road. The meeting is scheduled for 8:00 P.M. in the City Hall, 2401 Highway 10. The Library Board will meet at 7:00 P.M. to discuss the architect's recommendations (see article below). On Monday, March 14th the Library Board will meet with the Shoreview City Council to discuss a community library site in that city. The meeting is scheduled for 7:00 P.M. in the City Hall, 4665 N. Victoria Street. The architect has examined a total of four sites on Highway 96 and 49 and his recommendations will be discussed. It is planned that the Library Board will work with the officials from the two cities and Commissioner McCarty of District 1 in preparing recommendations for the County Board. Those recommendations will include specific sites, building programs and costs, and bonding amounts needed. The recommendations will be submitted to the County Board in -early April of this year. Architect's Report Due March 4th Buetow and Associates, Inc. has examined potential community library sites in Mounds View and Shoreview to determine usable space, access, soil conditions, availability, etc. The report and recommendations will be submitted to the Library Administrative Office no later than Friday, March 4th. Copies will be distributed on that day to the Library Board meyberq, cities of Shoreview and Mounds View, and suburban County Commissioners. A copy will be available for examination by interested citizens at the Library Administrative Offices (address above). The architect's report will also discuss some options for expanding the Roseville Library site to the north of the present location. ■ MEMO T0: MAYOR AND CITY COON* FROM: CLERK -ADMINISTRATOR DATE: FEBRUARY 24, 1988 SUBJECT: 1988 SALARY STRUCTURE Attached to this memorandum please find a copy of the lieu Salary Structure reflecting the three percent (3%) wage adjustment for all non -union personnel in the City of Mounds View. This wage structure, once approved by the City Council, will be come part of the City's Salary Administration and Performance Review Program. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the 1988 Salary Structure and inclusion with the City's Salary Administration and Performance Review Program. DFP/mjs Attachment: 59 POSITION Clerk -Administrator Finance Director Parka k Rea Director City Planner Building Official Accountant Parks k Rae Adm Asst Admin Secretary Police Secretary Utility Acctg Clk P.W../Planning Sec Aoctg Clerk Police Clk-Typist (full time equiv.) Receptionist Police Chief Police Lieutenant Patrol Sergeant P.W. Dir/City Engr P.W. Foreman ADOPTED CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW 1988 SALARY STRUCTURE ZONE A ZONE B-': ZONE C $44,757 - $48,237 $48,238 - $51,222 $51,223 - $54,703 =" $37,407 - $40,316 $40,316 - $42,810 $42,811 - $45,,719m; $35,'744 - $38,523 $38,524 - $40,906 $40,907 - 643; e �; $28,527 - $30,745 $30,746 - $32,648 $3264S - 334,867,_f.-. $29,723 - $32,033 $32,034 - $34,016 $34:017-:f361328 $23,476 - $25,300 125,301 - $26rA67 $26;868 - f28,692 Y $20,196 - $21,766 $21,767 - $23,113-$23,114 - $24,684 y 421,753 - $23,444 $23,445 - $24,895 $24,896.- $26,687 j $19,899 - $21,446 $21,447 - $22,773 $22,774 - f24,321 ram ' $18,851 - $20,316 $20,301 - 72i,573 i21,o,4 - i23; O,u-;:m $18,979 - $20,154 120,455 - $21,72/ $21,722-'$23,197.'�8.� r={a $18,446 - $19,879 $19,880 - $21,110 $21,111 - 122,5i3., $18,084 - $19,489 $19,490 - $20,696 =20'697 - $22-102"_. .5 . ;. $15,257 - $16,442 $16,443 - $17,461 $17,462-_318,647.' $42,227 - $46,510 $45,511 - $48,327 $48,328 - $51,511 $38,081 - $41,042 $41,043 - $43,581 $43,582 - $46,543 $34,098 - $36,749 $36,750 - $39,U25 $3v,ui0 - i:+�uSC =•= $37,893 - $40,839 $40,840 - $43,366 $43,367 - 046,31c. -- $30,543 - $32,918 $32,919 - $34,955 $34,956 - $37,331 MEMO TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL ^ l FROM: "LERK-ADMINISTRATO FEBRUARY DATE: 24, 1988 SUBJECT: SNOWMOBILE REGULATIONS Pursuant to our recent discussion with Police Chief Ramacher regarding your desire to amend the current snowmobile regulations for the City of Mounds View to prohibit snowmo- biles in the City except on private property, in emergency conditions, or by City maintenance or police personnel. Attached for your consideration is Ordinance No. 439 Ff prepared by Police Chief Ramacher amending Chapter 202 of < the Municipal Code entitled, "Snowmobile". Should you find this acceptable, Staff would recommend that it be placed on the next available regular agenda for a first reading. DFP/mjs Attachment: ""` ORDINANCE NO. 439 CITY OF MOUND" VIEW COUNTY OF EAMSF.Y STATE OF MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF MOUNDS VIEW BY AMENDING CHAPTER 202 ENTITLED, "SNOWMOBILES" The City Council of the City of Mounds View does hereby ordain: SECTION I. Chapter 202.02 is amended as follows: 202.02 Limitation of Operation. No person shall operate a snowmobile in Mounds View except en-publie-trailsr waterways-end-streets-end-t:ighways-spee}fieally-designated-- fer-such-user ; 1. On any privately owned land with the express permissi m of the property owner. He-person-shall-eperete-a-snowmobile-an-any--------- pr}vote}y-awned-prepertp-er-en-en-improved-boa}evard-nn}ass- they-have-reeeived-the-express-permission-ef-the-owner-ef--- said-prepertp-er-ef-the-owner-ef-the-property-abutting-an--- improved-boulevard.---An-improved-boulevard-means -that ------- pertien-ef-a-stree t-right-of-way- that- hes-been-improved-by-- the-inaballation-ef-a-}awnr-shrnbsr-er-treesr Ne-person-shell-eperete-e-snowmobile-in-the-Eitp-ef- Monnds-View-open-the-paved-portion-of-enp-trnnkr-eenntpr---- • + - orav#dad-}n-the-Statetes-end-the-fe}}awing- }r--in-a-d}reet-roube- fran- the-operato?ls-entry-into ------------ the-Fitp-ar-from-the-eperatarls-base-af--------- ------------ operation-te-the-permitted-snowmebile-area-end-- -------------reburn- 2r--Speed-shall-net-exceed-}5-miles-per-henr- 3r--The-operator-she}}_y}e}d_right-af.-way-te-a}}_-.__ ------------ether-vehie}es-and-al}-pedestriens- 4r�•-Eperater-she}}-be-en-the-right-side-af-the------ ------------center-line-and-as-far-to-bhe-right-es---------- ------------preceieab}e- ORDINANCE NO. 439 PAGE TWO OF THREE 5r--Snewmeb#ies-shc�#-be-epereted-in-s#ng#e-f##er SECTION II. Chapters 207.04, 202.05, 202.06, 202.07 and 202.08 shall be deleted. SECTION III. Chapter 202.04 :s to be added and is to read as follows: SECTION IV. Chapter 202.05 is to be added and is to read as follows: SECTION V. Chapter 202.06 is to be added and is to read as follows: SECTION VI. :his ordinance shall take affect thirty days after the date of its publication. Read by the City Council of the City of Mounds View this day of , 1988. Reau and ;ISSed by the City Council of the City of Mounds View this day of , 1988. ATTEST: (SEAL) APPROVED AS TO FORM: Mayor Clerk -Administrator r, k 202.02 Limitation of operation. No person shall operate a snowmobile in Mounds View except; 1. On any privately.owned land with the express permission of the property owner. 2. In an emergency during the period of time when and at location where the condition 6f the roadway renders = travel by automobile impractical, 3. By City Maintenance Personnel and members of the City Police Force in .the performance of their duties. No person shall operate a snowmobile in the City of Mounds View upon the paved portion or boulevard of any trunk highway, county road or municipal street. a MEMO TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL ^J FROM: Cr.ERK-ADMINISTRATOR y�y DATE: FEBRUARY 24, 1988 l/���// SUBJECT: COUNCIL CHAMBERS CARPETING Staff has received proposals from three local carpeting in firms for the installation of carpeting, p ad, and base the Council Chambers. The bidders and their prices are as follows: C and S Carpet Specialists $2549.00 Jerry's Floor Store $2452.00 Blaine Carpet and Interiors $2007.80 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Council award the carpeting of the Council Chambers to Blaine Carpet and Interiors for their low bid in the amount of $2007.80. DFP/mjs 1. MEMO TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: CLERK-ADMINISTRATO(RC DATE: MARCH 2, 1988 SUBJECT: EMERGENCY PROCEDURES MANUAL Staff has completed an update of the City 's Emergency Procedures Manual and will be handing it out to you at your Agenda Session on March 7, 1988. This manual contains copies of the City's Emergency Frocedures Plans as well as that of the Fire Department heand tthoseMsections of the Ramsey County Plans which apply to View. Also, various sections are included in this manual listing important information that the City might would requireask in responding to emp-gencies in our community. u keep this manual in your possession for use during local emergencies and handed it over to your successor at the time you leave office. Should you have any, questions pertaining hto anyeof thetitenknow. contained in this manual, please not DFP/mjs N'. N MEMO TO: MAYOR AND CITY CO WCFROM: CLERK-ADMINISTRATO (711 DATE: MARCH 2, 1988 SUBJECT: FIRE DEPARTMENT REQUEST FOR FUNDS Attached please find a memorandum from Fire Chief Fagerstrom to the three cities regarding a request to repower Ladder 9 which is located at Station 1. Chief Fagerstrom indicates that the current engine on this piece of equipment is in need of major repairs and that a replaceme t of the current engine with new equipment would be more econmically reasonable than repairing the existing engine. Chief Fagerstrom has received proposals for this work with the lowest of those being $17,749 Should the engine be repowered for this price the City of Mounds View's contribution for this expense would be $3,949.16. Chief Fagerstrom is requesting that the cities agree to s supplementary contribution as provided for under Article 5.6, (a) of the contract between the cities and the Fire Department which provides that the Fire Department may make supplementary reques�s when annual budgetary appropriations are not sufficient to meet expenses. The cities could take the position that they will not provide a supplementary appropriation for this repair and that the Department should take this out of the Contingency Account which is funded to the level of $20,000.00, however, as you can probably guess we would be facing a request for supplementary funds later on in the year due to the fact that these repairs would nearly wipe out the existing balance in the Contingency Account. Not wanting the Department to be operating without adequate numbers of functioning equipment and not wishing to put the Department in a position of coming to us with requests for funds on an all too frequent basis due to the elimination of their Contingency Account, I would recommend that the Council authorize the payment of $3,949.16 to the Fire Department :with those funds F coming out of the City of Mounds View's 1988 Contingency Account. Your direction in this matter would be appreciated. DPF/mia Attachment: DATE: February 24, 1988 SUB!;.AT: Request to Repower Ladder 9 TO: Ken Irvin Blaine A:ting City Manager Don Pauley Mounds Viev Clerk -Administrator Don Busch Spring Lake Park Clark-Treasurar FROM: Fire Chief We hava had continuing maintenance problems with Ladder 9 at Station 1. Last ,year we spent a total of $6,182.92 in repairs Including the exhaust system, carburetors (two), compressor, po--r steering, radiator recured, and several tune-ups. The truck is old, having been delivered in 1971. Our current dilemm- is a result of having a water leak repaired. Antifreeze wax leaking into the crank case and we sent the truck in for repairs. On Friday, February 15, as the truck was being driven back to Station 1, the oil pressure gauge dropped to zero at Long Lake Road and 's Highway 10. After reaching the station, the mechanic checked the oil sending gauge, which was working. The truck was then towed back to Emergency Jpparatus Maintenance, Inc. in New Brighton, and the motor tore down. The rods, bearings and crankshaft are destroyed and in the case of the crankshaft would have to be machined. The total estimated cost of repair to the truck approached $11,000, and we would still have the old motor with no guarantee that something else, say the pistons, might go or 777. The condition of the body and running gear including the aerial ladder are good. The truck is worth salvaging. Even though it will cost more to repower (install a new engine and related parts), I feel it is more economical than to continue to Datch and fix the old as we have been doing. The latest bill for fixing the intttal voter leak an' tearing down to discover the current problem has been quoted to me at approximatel; $4500. (The statement has not arrived as yet.) The sums involved are really horrendous. A new ladder truck in today's market sells in a range from $250,000 to $325,000 depending on options included. Hence, you can appreciate my position that we should repair the rig. Ken Irvin, Blaine Acting City Manager Dnn Pauley, Mounds View Clerk -Administrator Don Busch, Spring L.ke Park Clerk/Treasurer Page 2 �A February 23, 1988 f i I have gone on to some length since I feel a short background summary is necessary. Attached are copies of the two quotes I have received as fellows: Emergency Apparatus Maintenance, Inc. $21,500 Interstate Diesel Products, Inc. $17,749 I am requesting that emergency funds be provided from the three cities since this is an extraordinary expense and that Interstate Diesel Products, Inc. be awarded the bid. The cost distribution breakdown is as follows using the same percentage figures as used in developing the 1988 budget. BLAINE 64.4 + 63.9 X $17,749 $11,385.98 2 HOUNDS VIEN 22.5 + 22.0 X $17,749 $ 3,949.16 , 2 SPRING LAKE PARK 13.1 + 14.1 X $17,749 $ 2,413_86 2 TOTAL 17S ,749.00 I feel we should arrange a joint meeting as soon as possible so that decision can be reached and we can get this unit back in service as soon as possible. I'll be waiting to hear from you. Ron Fage trwm :lwi RF/ja , Attachments 2 - MERGENCY APPARATUS AINTENANCE, INC. MWIN 204 Third Avenue S. E. New Brighton, MN 55112 February 19,1988 (612) 6316.6628 Spring Lake Park Fire E_partment 1810 Hwy 10 Spring Lake Park, Mn 55432 Attention: Chief Fagerstrom; Re: quote on 5709 Repower Removal of F817G Waukesha Engine Install New 5-71TA 300 HP Detroit Diesel Engine Installation of the followings New Air Compressor, Mounts, and Piping New Alternator Nrunts, and Wiring New Muffler and Exhaust System Complete New Power Steering Pump Mounts and Hoses New Radiator Plumbing and Heater Hoses New Complete Air Cleaner Assembly and Piping New Clutch Complete New Throttle Hook Ups for Truck and Laddet Controls Complete New Battery Cables and Batteries as Necessary (Fire Department to purchase Engine direct from Interstate Diesel for $11,519.00. //, 5/�� quoted price i/ from Ken Braun at Interstate Diesel. Engine to include- Complete Engine, Side Mount Turbo, Front Engine Mount, f2 Bell Housing, flywhce.l, 2 Groove Pulley on right rear of Engine driven off counter shaft, Fan and Fan Clutch Kit- 2300 full Load Speed. This job ties been quoted at 157 hours Labor, we came up with this figure by our studying the job firsthand, and by pr.,vious experience :n repowering, and any hours lees than 157 will be deducted from the bill at a rate of $35.00/hr., but we guarantee our price will not be over 157 hours, also there is $1500.00 in Air Compressor and Mounts, Alternator Mounts, Power Steering Mounts and Hoses. We priced these parts through a local supplier so we could give you a NOT TO EXCEED price in our quote. Any parts that can be retrofitted from your existing engine to the new engine will be done and the cost of each part will be deducted from the biii. FAH cht-gee to complete job and supply parts not to exceed $9,981.00. We appreciate the opportunity to quote you on this job. Any questions feel free 1f��� sot) to call. Ti ank you ` ave Schreier emergency Apparatus Maintenance, Inc. . : u:: : •tea. ] Diesel Products, Inc. 1976oakaestAvenue Rose" . Minnesota55113 612-633.74f February 22, 1988 , Spring Lake Park Fire -opt. 1810 Highway 10 Station I Chief Mark Strand The following is a bid on a repcwer of your unit. 6-71TA Engine 11,000.0n Clutch Fan 516.00 Air Compressor 283.00 Air Cleaner 6 Muffler 800.00 Engine Mounts, Misc. Parts 6 Clutch 500.00 Rear End Gear Change 1,050.00 Labor 31600.00 TOTAL BID 17,749.00 Thank you for allowing us to Stake this bid. Sincerely Sill Tugger n Operations Manager Roseville Branch CORPORATE OFFICE BRANCH LOCATIONS 2501 EAST SO" STREET VIRGINIA. MH RAPID CITY, 50 BISMARCK. NO BILLINOS,MT MINNEAPCLIS, MN 55420 FAR00, ND MISSOOIA, MT WIILISiON, NO GILLETTE. WY PHONE 612-854.551I MEMO TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCI FROM: CLERK-ADMINISTRAT DATE: MARCH 2, 1988 SUBJECT: NORTH SUBURBAN CABLE COMMISSION 1988 CONTRIBUTION Attached please find a letter from Bootsie Anderson, administrator for the North Suburban Cable Commission, transmitting to the City of Mounds View a check from Cable TV North Central in the amount of $25,273.97 reflecting the City's 1987 franchise fees. Also enclosed with Ms. Anderson's letter was a statement from the Cable Commission in the amount of $18,110.62 reflecting the City's contribution to the Commission for 'Cheir operation during 1988. The net result is that the City of Mounds View will have available to it a total of $7,163.35 out _ of the franchise fees to fund our cable operation during 1988. ?, I realize that many of you will respond negatively to the contribution requested by the Cable Commission, however, the alternative to paying this contribution would also appear to be an unsatisfactory outcome, namely withdrawal from the Commission. Therefore, staff would recommend Council authorization of the payment of $18,110.62 to the North Suburban Cable Commission as a contribution to its 1988 operating costs. I have requested that Parks, Recreation and Forestry Director _ =' Mary Saarion complete an analysis of the City's cable TV budget in comparison to the $7,163.35 we will have available to us in 1988 to determine impacts of this reduction in our available revenue sources. This report will be provided to you as soon as it is available. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends payment of the 1988 contribution to the North Suburban Cable Commission in the amount of $18,110.62 to be charged to the City's Cable TV Fund. DFP/mjs Attachment: ■ iORTH SUBURBAN CABLE COMMISSION )77WEST URPENIEURAVENUE FALCONHEIGHIS.MINNES0TA55113 (612)646.9172 Mounds View STATEMENT THE A3AG!:71 DUE for your 1988 contribution to the Borth Suburban Cable Co=ission is $ 18,110.62 THIS AMOUNT IS DUE AND PAYABLE. UPON RECEIPT OF THIS STATEMENT TO 17 E NORTH SUBURBAN CABLE COMMISSION 2077 'WEST LARPENTEUR CON HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA 55113 Arden HlBe s Falcon Hoghb • Lauderdale • Lllde Canada • Mounds Vim{ s New Bdghton • North Oaks s Row4e s St. Anthony s Shoreview 10RTH SUBURBAN CABLE COMMISSION 177WEST LARPENTE'URAVENUE FALCON HEIGHTS. MINNESOTA55113 • (612)646•e172 March 1., 1988 Mr. Donald Pauley Mound. View City Hall 2401 Highway 10 Mounds View, MN 55112 Dear Mr. Pauley: Enclosed please find your 1987 Franchise Checks from Cable TV North 'y,ZyAli. f7 Central. These checks are calculated from January 1, 1987 thru December 31, 1987 and are to be five percent of all direct revenue producing services. Additionally, please find a bill for your cities 1988 contribution to �jY��dd1 the North Suburban Cable Commission as submitted and approved by your i Council last fall. Cable TY North Central has alau jloLrivutcd its 1087 :.r.❑��l u� 'nd this will be sent to you next week in my regular Commission meeting A� 7�3 update letter. If you have further questions or concerns, feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Bootsie Anderson Administrator BA: kjz Enclosure Ardm HRts • Falmnhldghs- Laudvdale • Utse Canada • MoundsVlew • New Brighton • North Oaks • Ro ifle • St.Anthony a Shmedew I+d') r�A;h+:b: F55 CA;.GULp'(i�'v: >iDR'n yVb�;N69 Date* 21 ./91 MOUND© V I IW t: V INOTALL REVENUE S� Js 974.24 RA91C F'CVINUE 253,229.59 NAY REVENUE 169,151.0E AD OUTLET/FM/REMOTE FAY Pik VIEW 37,32e.59 OTHER (CONVERSION) 31,881.53 MIlUADRAL0 ACV 9,914.29 TOTAL 505,479.32 5X FRANCHISE FEE 25,273.97 .................................................... .,............... i certify to the best of my knowledge that the revenue for 190 is correct as ststedi , John Evens, Vtce Prsalx Re V 1 MEMO TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCI�L 13 /� FROM: CLERK-ADMINISTRATORCL W9 1 DATE: MARCH 2, 1968 SUB3ECT: S.F. 1769 (REICHGOTT) COMPARABLE WORTH LAW AMENDMENT Attached please find a -opy of pages 9 and 10 of Senate File 1769 introduced by Senator Reichgott, which in addition to many other things, proposes an amendment to the Comparable Worth Law of 1984. This pLoposeu amendment would allow the Commissioner of Human Rights to determine that a local governmental unit is not in compliance with the Comparable Worth Law, has not implemented the findings of a job evaluation system, or that the study conducted by the local governmental unit is invalid based upon the require- ments of the Comparable Worth Law. Once the Commissioner has determined that one of these three items has occurred, the State of Minnesota is prohibited from paying and the local governmental unit is prohibited from receiving any State monies until such time as the violation has been rectified. The amendment further provides that an employee of the State or of the local governmental unit is guilty of a misdemeanor they knowingly allow a local governmental unit to receive State monies when they are j not in compliance with the Comparable Worth Law. As I see it, the ranger with this Legislation is not with 1v requiring that cities come into compliance with the Comparable Worth Law but that there are no guidelines established for use by :he Commissioner of Human Rights to determine what studies are valid. At the present time, there are many different forms of studies that have been conducted to comply with the requirements of the Comparable Worth Law and many different opinions as to which of these is actually valid based upon the requirements of the Law. Essentially, the amendment would give the Commissioner an extremely broad authority to determine validity and if a study is determined to be invalid order that a new study be completed by a firm of his/her choosing at the ' ;:s' governmental unit's expense. Although opposition to such Legislation would appear to many to be opposition to the spirit and intent of comparable wortn, my concern really lies with the fact that an individual is given unlimited powers to enforce a law when there is no clear guide- lines provided by the law or by legislative intent as to the methodology for complying with the law. Although I am not suggesting that the City of Mounds View take a public position in opposition to this legislation, it would be my recommendation that should the opportunity present itself the City should voice its concerns regarding this legislation to our own legislators and to any other members of the state legislature while this bill is before it. Your direction in this matter would be appreciated. D P/m j s Attachment: 1/20/88 [REVISOR I EB/SS 88-3317 • 1 disabled persons or organizations. 2 A prospective employer need not pay for an accommodation 3 for a job applicant if it is available from an alternative 4 source without cost to the employer or applicant. 5 (7)(a) Failure to complete a job evaluation system as set 6 out in section 471.994 by August 1, 1988, or failure to compile 7 the reports required under section 471.995 by August 1, 1988, 8 shall make any entity covered by sections 471.994 and 471.995 9 ineligible to receive state funds of any kind either directly or 10 indirectly. The commissioner of the department of employee .11 relations shall immediately notify the commissioner of human 12 rights of any entity not in compliance with section 471.994 or 13 471.995. If the commissioner of human rights has reason to ( 14 believe that an entity is not in compliance with section 471.994 15 or 471.995, the commissioner shall notify that entity of its 15 potential noncompliance If the entity does not provide proof 17 to the commissioner of human rights that it is in compliance 18 with section 471.994 or 471.995 within ten days of receiving 19 notification, the commissioner of human rights shall notify the 20 entity and all state agencies that no state funds may either 21 directly or indirectly be received by said entity, 22 It is a misdemeanor for an employee of the state to allow 23 an entity the employee knows is not in compliance with section 24 471.994 or 471.995 to receive any state money. It is a 1 25 misdemeanor for an employee of any entity not in compliance to ,26 facilitate in any way the receipt of state funds while the 27 employee knows the entity is not incompliance; 20 ;;� -- a g. nF hi,man richts may bring an action on 29 behalf of the state in district court to retrieve any mone-F paid 30 to any entity not in compliance with section 471.994 or 31 471.995. In the action, all funds paid to the entity since 32 August 1 1988, must be refunded to the state. If said entity 33 is found not in compliance with section 471.994 or 471.995 in 34 such an action, it shall be entitled to absolutely no funds or 35 payments from the state. 36 ,fib) Failure to have implemented the findings of the job 9 1/20/88 (REVISOR ) EB/SS 68-3317 1 evaluation system required by section 471.994 or 471.995 is a 2 prima facie showing of sex discrimination in all legal and 3 administrative hearings The showing may be rebutted only by 4 clear and convincing evidence presented by an employer that 5 proves that their pay scales are not discriminatory. 6 (c) If the commissioner of human rights believes a study 7 done under section 471.994 or 471.995 is invalid, the 8 commissioner may order that a new study be done by a firm chosen 9 by the commissioner of human rights The entity must cooperate 10 with the study. If the results of this study are at variance 11 with those of the entity's own study, the entity may adopt the 12findings of the new study, work out an agreement with the 13 commissioner of human rights as to w'at the findings will beg or 14 request a hearing before an administrative law judge to 15 determine what the appropriate findings will be. 16 Sec. 6. Minnesota Statutes 1986, section 363.03, 17 subdivision 2, is amended to read: 18 Subd. 2. (REAL PROPERTY.) It is an unfair discriminatory 19 practice: 20 (1) For an owner, lessee, sublessee, assignee, or managing 21 agent of, or other person having the right to sell, rent or 22 lease any real property, or any agent of any of these: 23 (a) to refuse to sell, rent, or lease or otherwise deny to 24 or withhold from any person or group of persons any real 25 property} because of race, color, creed, religion, national 26 origin, sex, maritzl status, status with regard to public 27 assistance, disability, or familial status; or 28 (b) to discriminate against any person or group of persons 29 because of race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, 30 marital status, status with regard to public assistance, 31 disability, or familial status in the terms, conditions or 32 privileges of the sale, rental or lease of any real property or 33 in the furnishing of facilities or services in connection 34 c,zcrewith, except that nothing in this clause shall be construed 35 to prohibit the adoption of reasonable rules intended to protect 36 the safety of minors in their use of the real property or any r L LW 10 MEMO TO: MAYOR AND COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: MARY SAARION, DIRECTOR PARKS, RECREATION AND FORESTRY DATE: MARCH 1, 1988 R£: PORTABLE RESTROOM FACILITY BIDS Bids were received from six companies. The prices are listed on the attached sheet. Port-o-Let is the lowest price per month and is also offering one free restroom from May to September. The Port-o•• Let Company is located in Blaine just north of Mounds View off of County Road J on 85th Avenue. This is convenient to Mounds View for special requests. Port-o-Let has just entered the portable restroom facility business, but is affiliated with Waste Management, Inc. an established company. RECOMMENDATION: To consider the approval to award Port-o-Let the contract for providing portable restroom facilities from May 1, 198E - February 19, 1989 at the price of $3,628.00 to be funded in the parks budget for portable restroom facilities 100-4360-356-000. ��— �..•y��'il��.nmiS YI /^\ PORTABLE RESTROOM BIDS h �N 1 1 /� COMPANY COST d j TOTAL �a Sanitation Stations $55.00/month (1/week clean-up, no 6 months x $ss x 8 unite = $ 2,640 NOT I14CLUSI9S (Does not offer delivery charge, insurance includ=d) 2.5 months x $55 x 4 unite = $ 550 .1` handicapped unit) no handicapped 'I7 Satellite/BFI $50.00/4 week billing (damage waiver, 6 months x $50 x 7 units = $2,100 , ($4,100) no delivery charge, $125/handicapped 2.5 months x S 500 50 x 4 unite =' $$4,1001 h8" unit. Free Hillview May 2- Sept. 6 $125 x 2 x 6 51,500L� . Jimmy's Johnnys $55/month, $110/handicapped 6 months x $55 x 8 units = $2,640 ($4,510) (insurance included, delivery free) 2.5 months x $55 x 4 units = $ 550 $4 310 $110 x 6 months x 2 units = $1,320 Sanitary Toilet $62/month, $90/handicapped ed $ PP 6 months x $62 x 8 unite - $2,976 Service, Inc. ($15 delivery/unit, damage waiver costs 2.5 months x $62 x 4 units - $ 620 $4026 ($4,826 plus 7% ins.) 7 percent of cost) $90 x 6 months x 2 units - $1,080 plus 7% $15 x 10 = $ 150' 'r Biff's Inc_ $52.50/month, $110/handicapped 6 months x $52.50 x 8 units = $2,250 ($4,415.00) ($25 delivery/pickup/handicapped) 2.5 months x $52.50 x 4 units = $ 525 $4,415 $110 x 2 x 6 months + $50 - $1,370 Port-o-Let $49/month, $90/month handicapped 6 months x $49 x 7 units = $2,058 ($3,62P? (damage waiver, service, one free -estroom) 2.5 months x $49 x 4 units = $ 490 $3,628 $90 x 6 months x 2 units = $1,080 Jam. 6 C `1q MEMO TO: MAYOR AND COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: MARY SAARION, DIRECTOR. PARKS, RECREATION AND FORESTRY DATE: FEBRUARY 26, 1988 RE: PURCHASE OF PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT Playground equipment was an item on the 1988 park capital improvements plan. At the regular February Parks and Recreakion Commission meeting members made a motion to recommend to the City Council the approval to purchase Game Time equipment which is currently on sale. The choice of colors is green posts and brown planks. The sale cost is $8,755.00 plus freight not to exceed $9,000.00 total. This is the amount budgeted for 1988 capital improvements for this item to come out of the Park Dedication Fund 410-120-4705. The park capital improvement plan for 1988 shows a schedule of new playground equipment for Oakwood Par'. However, because of the r unknown impact of the new Pinewood playground equipment, and without wanting to duplicate facilities within such a short distance, the Commission has decided to consider replacing Hillview Park play equipment first. The Oakwood Park equipment purchase is scheduled for 1989 and the type of equipment will be chosen after a need is determined by the impact of the Pinewood play equipment. RECOMMENDATION: To consider the approval to purchase "on -sale" playground equipment which is budgeted for $9,000.00 including freight with monies coming from '.he Park Dedication Fund 410-120- 4705. .cam'-zz"fal� MEMO TO: MAYOR AND COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: MARY SAARION, DIRECTOR PARKS, RECREATION AND FORESTRY DATE: FEBRUARY 26, 1988 RE: POLICY FOR USE OF OUTDOOR PARK FACILITIES The Parks and Recreation Commission made a motion to recommend to the City Council the adoption of the attached policy for use of outdoor park facilities. The attached cover memo to the Commission provides the need for the policy. If you have any questions or comments regarding this policy proposal, please call me at extension number 20. RECOMMENDATION: To consider the approval of the policy regarding the use of outdoor park facilities. MS/sl Attachment I C S MEMO TO: PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION FROM: MARY SAARION, DIRECTOR PARKS, RECREATION AND FORESTRY DATE: FEBRUARY 11, 1988 RE: POLICY FOR USE OF OUTDOOR PARK FACILITIES find attached a proposal for a policy which is suggested Please for granting use of park facilities. for the policy became apparent last spring when the , The need Recreation Department was called by several soccer Parks and to request use of City soccer fields for practices and . groups Many of the teams p'_ayed in other city leagues. league games. is such a shortage of soccer fields, the teams are Because there neighboring cities to request use of fields. Our calling neighboring city, Shoreview, has already implemented such a policy. This policy assures that community residents and groups have. non-residents idents. if fields are open, priority over non-resco be tfees,triSute to the p could use the fields but would req field by payment ofiuser maintenance of the i am open for discussion on this matter. MS/s l °r Enclosure In POLICY FOR USE OF OUTDOOR PARK FACILITIES Due to the large number of requests for City facilities, the Parks and Recreation Department has deemed it necessary to establish a priority list of users in order to insure that the City's facilities are made available to meet community needs: The priorities are as follows: 1. All directly related City activities or directly controlled City organizations. 2. School District #621 directly related school organizations. 3. Youth athletic associations which are publicly advertised and who accept all qualified persons. 4. Resident youth groups - comprised of 50 percent Mounds View residents. 5. Resident adult groups - comprised of 50 percent Mounds View residents (live or work). 6. Non-resident groups— any group not meeting the 50 percent resident criteria. 7. Commercial groups. FEE SCHEDULE The following fees will be charged to groups based on a per field/per day basis: 1. City, youth athletic, school district - Exempt (priorities 1, 2, and 3) 2. Resident youth groups (priority 4) .........$ 5.00/field/day 3. Resident adult groups (priority 5) .........$ 5.00/field/day 4. Non-resident groups (priority 6) ...........$10.00/field/day 5. Commercial groups (priority 7) .............$25.00/field/day 6. The privilege of receiving a permit for use of fields for occasional users .....S 2.H /nermit 7. The privilege of receiving a permit for use of fields by priority 6 & 7 users ...... $2.00/permit qq MEMO TO: MAYOR AND COUNCILMEMBERS ►.,7 FROM: MARY SAARION DATE: FEBRUARY 26, 1988 RE: SILVER VIEW POND PATHWAY A petition was received by the Mounds View Parks, Recreation and Forestry Department on February 25, 1988. This petition addresses the Parks and Recreation Commission and City Council regarding interest in completing construction of the Silver View Park pond pathway. Staff wishes to reintroduce this issue. As you may recall, the last meeting was held on November 17 with City Forester Wriskey S discussing plans for early summer plantings along the park property behind the homes of residents abutting Silver Vie% dark pond. f A letter is attached from Dan Boxrud, offering his opinion on potential water -run-off concerns regarding the construction of a. path. if the patb,.ay is to be completed, it should probably be construct- ed at the same time when plantings are planted. Staff requests City Council direction regarding this matter. MS/sl PETITION We, the undersigned citizens of Mounds View, do hereby Petition the Parks and Recreation Commis -for the City of Mounds View, and the City Council for the City of Mounds View to: Finish construction of the wood -chip hiking path around Silver Lake Pond so that the path completely circles the entire shoreline. This task should be undertaken as soon as possible so that all citizens of Mounds View can have the experience of being able to walk around the pond in a safe manner, and with the knowledge that they are indeed on park property. In view of the fact that the land around the pond is owned by the City, for the benefit of all citizens, it is imperative that this path be constructed so as to make clear the rights of all citizens to walk on the path, and also to insure a safe and uninterrupted hiking path around Silver View Pond. / NP11tE� ADDRESS DATE PHONE i , 11"Imm OR I. : .... ,..Y -- E7�� ��'� , i .s petition will be collected and mailed to: Mary Saarion, Director Parks and Recreation Department City of Mounds View 2401 Highway 10 Mounds View, MN 55112 ENGINEERS I ARCHREC]S *PLANNERS 1,. • ^ FTA55117 6r 4E4-0272 x TO: CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW ATTN: MARY SAARION FROM: DAN BOXRUD DATE: DECEMBER 10, 1987 SUBJECT: ILVER VI8 VIEW PARK TRAIL S MEMORANDUM I field checked the location where you plan to install additional wood chip trail in Silver View Park on hesouthwest sideue ofwthe pond. My understanding is that you propose northerlyltor connect notohthe existing owood chipncrete trail westerly fom the end Of the trailOn the northwest corner of the pond. t+ trail appears to have been constructed on The existing wood chip top of the existing ground. In certain locations, 'based this has lot the potential for blocking drainage. However, basnthat this grades I saw west of the concrete walk, it appears method of construction could be continued without blocking drainage. The location of the trail would need to be carefully picked so as to have enough cross slopthe ew owachipse won d not pond so that the additional height created by be higher than the ground south of the trail. If the desired trail routing does end up in a flatter area adjacent to the backsoil lines, it may be desirable to dig the trail down into the top so that the existing grade can be continued towstioard the pond. n this I believe this addresses Yoe gaquiren anything8efurther, you raid to meo please proposed project. If advise. DRB:jms CHIPPEWAFALLS ST PAOL IvrCONSIN SHORT ELLIOTT MINNESD:A HENDRICCON INC. MEMO TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: MARY SAARION, DIRECTOR PARKS, RECREATION AND FORESTRY DATE: MARCH 3, 1988 RE: GRANT -PROPOSAL The attached is a grant proposal for funding from the Children's Trust Fund. The.activity funding proposed is for "School's Out Days", a daylong program of recreational activities especially designed -for children of working parents. The City's portion of matching funds are in -kind services and fees. If the grant is approved,• the.program will provide opportunities for a great fun day fo`r children and an option for daycare for parents who work on the days that.the children have "off" from school. PECOMSENDATION: To approve the grant proposal for funding by the r, Children_s'Trust Fund for assistance regarding "School Days Out" programs. _ MS/sl -1- TABLE OF CONT=-_TS 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................... 2A, 2B FAtE.:.SHEETS (FORMS) ............ 3 PROGRAM -ABSTRACT .................................... 3 PROBLEM AND NEED STATEMENT .......................... 4 .: SERVICES T0. BE.PROVIDED (FORM) , .................... NARRATIVE OF SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED .......... 8 BUDGET FORM .. ....................................... 9-10 s' BUDGET NARRATIVE .................................... , 11 FORM CTF-I=B ......... .............................. SUPPORTING -INFORMATION .............................. 12-14 wb 1 S -2- 2 3. CHILDREN'S TRUST FUND FACE SHEET Applicant Agency (with whom the contract is to be executed) City of Mounds View ( 612 1 784-3055 Legal Name ' Telephone 2401 Highway 10 Mounds View 55112 Address City Zip Director of Applicant Agency Donald F. Pauley , Clerk-Admin(9trator Name Title Operati,q Agency if different from 11) Same ( ) Legal Name Telephone CTF-I-A Address City Zip 4• Program Director/Contact Person Mary Saarion.IDirectoi Parks Recreation 6 Forestry j612 one 784-3055 _.. Name, Title - S. 1 6. 7. Fiscal Officer Donald bra er F'_nance Director , _ ( 612 ) 784-3052 Name, Title Telephone Federal I.D. Number MN Tax I.D. Number 41-6008912 _ =Qhai"`unc'_s_bv Spsir�a .. �Or i:iiie �-uG-bin• Federal St,te - County Private (specify) City 1,447.10 Fees _ 4.026.00 Amount'Requested from Children's Trust Fund S 5.434.00 TOTAL PROGRAM 110.906.00 9034948 Leave Blank, Official Use Only Sequence Number Vendor -Number Amount Awarded Date Received Time Received -3- PROGRAM ABSTRACT ® This program proposal addresses the need for childcare programs t during school vacation days. Households which have two working parents or a single working parent and school age children are often burdened with the problem of arranging care for their children) during non -school workdays. Mounds View School District #621 scheduled twenty-two school days including two•MEA days, five days of conferences, three clerical days and twelve holidays during the 1987-88 school year. These were all normal business workdays. Thankgiving, Christmas and New Years days which were traditional holidays, are not included in the numbers above. This proposal addresses the need for school age childcare during school vacation days and is specifically designed for the working parent(s). In this day and age, an increasing number of households have two working parents. It is stressful for parents to try to find j adequate arrangements for childcare during school vacation days. The goal of this program proposal is to offer an opportunity FOR parents to registar their school age children in a fun, recreational program of organized daylong activities scheduled i J during normal'workdays when the schools are not in session. _.. cif' Y PROBLEMS AND NEED STATEMENT Working parents usually have daily arrangements for pre-school age childcare but seldom have arrangements for school age childcare during occasional days when school is not in session. Therefore, during work days when school is not in session, there is a need for childcare. Such arrangements are not made Asily because sporatic daycare services are not always available. It becomes stressful for parents when"childcare is not available for their school "___ _- _..,,ti ��1 days. Tha nifarnafivp is �fhan children uuiiS�_ t,.o�� .... .... _-,-. that the children) stay home alone or parents take a vacation day unwilling'-y. U SERVICES TLc PROVIDED Goals Timetable To provide a fun, daylong To offer a fun program Elements 11,41, ""' -�• childcare ooportunity'for of daylong activities for students 6-12 program of day- ,School vacs=` Eyg working parent families who schuolage children, ydars old l long activities for participan�6', [ion days Octal, giv need childcare during days when school is not attending schools including swim_:,. 1988 to June 1,'"- It in session. in Mounds View wing, trips, 1989 as 2,'` School District snacks, active scheduled 3, #621. and passive by Mounds activities. View School Czi7 District 162 "a] P 2.= Coave acces ­.affor eA c. 3.`:=Fulf1: ,--measw ;progr• n HOUNDS VIEW PARKS, RECREATION AND FORESTRY DEPARTMENT 2401 Highway 10 Mounds View, HN 55112 784-3055 o "School Days 0 '1"' "School Days Out" activities are offered to families with working parents who reed a daylong supervised program for their children. This program is for children In 1st - 6th grades and is held at Random Park classroom building (Long Lake Rd. and Ridge Lane). The day is scheduled with quiet and active activities and special events or trips. Participants should bring along appropriate play clothing, books or magazines to read, lunch and swim suit and towel. The children should be dropped off at Edgewood Community Center pool where attendance and first activity will be held. Parents should pick children up at Random Park. Registration is on a first -come, first -serve basis. Registration deadline is two days prior to the day. NO REGISTRATIONS ARE ACCEPTED ON THE ACTIVITY DAY. For additional information call 784- 3055. DAY 11 - SLIDING AT SILVER VIEW PARK 7:30 - 8:00 a.m. Arrival - Drop off at Edgewood Pool 8:00 - 9:00 a.m. Swimming 9:00 - 9:15 a.m. Hike to Random Park Classroom Building (3 blks.) 9:13 - 9:45 a.m. Reading Quiet Time/snack 9:45 - 11:30 a.m. Halt Disney movie 11:30 - 12:00 - 12:00 noon 2:30 p.m. Lunch Walk to Silver View Park sliding hill (2 blks.) 2:30 - 3:00 p.m. Return for hot chocolate and cookies 3:00 - 4:00 p.m. Table games 4:00 - 4:30 p.m. Clean-up and departure Fee is $12.00/person including supervision., snacks, movies and swimming. spccin +ncrructions: Bring a swim suit and towel, reading material, bag lunch, some type of sliding equipment and warm sliding clothes. DAY 02 - XC SKI LESSONS AT ELM CREEK PARR RESERVE ?:30 - 8:00 a.m. Arrival - Drop off at Edgewood 8:00 - 9:00 a.m. Swimming 9:00 - 9:15 a.m. Hike to Random Park Classroom Building (3 blks.) 9:15 - 9:45 a.m. .-,Zad4-Q•,4^[ Tema/snack 9:45 - 11:30 a m. Walt Disney movie 11:30 - 12:00 noon Lunch 12:00 noon Departure for Elm Creek Reserve 1:00 - 3:30 p.m. XC ski lessons and touring at Elm Creek 3:30 - 4:30 p.m. Return Fee is $12.00/person' including supervision, snack, movie, swimming, bus transporatfon, ski equipment rental and ski instruction. Special instructions: Bring a swim suit and towel, reading material, bag lunch and warm clothing for skiing. 6 DAY 03 - ROLLERSRATINC AT CHEEP SKATE 7:30 - 8:00 a.m. Arrival - Drop off at Edgewood Poul BOO - 9:00 a.m. Swimming 9:00 •• 9:1'5 a.m. Hike to Random Park Classroom Bldg. (3 blks.) 9:15 - 9:45 a.m. Quiet Reading/Snack 9:45 - 10:45 a.m. Board Games 10:45 - 12:30 p.m. Disney movie and lunch 12:30 p.m. Departure for Cheep Skate 1:00 - 3.00 p.m. Skating 3:30 p.m. Return to Random Park Classroom Bldg. 3:30 - 4:30 p.m. Board games or outdoor play Fee is $12.00/person including supervision, snack, movie, swimming, rollerskating admission and bus transportation. Special instructions: a swim suit and towel, resding material and bag lunch. DAY 14 - BOWLING AT MERMAID LANES 7:30 - 8:00 a.m. Arrival - Drop off at Edgewood. Pool 8:00 - 9:00 a.m. Swimming 9:00 - 9:15 a.m. Hike to Random Park Classroom Bldg. (3 blks.) 9:15 - 9:45 a.m. Reading quiet time/snack 9:45 - 10:30 a.m. Active games 1U:30 - 12:00 noon Disney movie 12:00 noon Lunch 12:30 p.m. Departure for bowling 3:0o p.m. Return 3:00 - 4:00 p.m. Active games 4:00 - 4:30 p.m. Board games Fee is $12.00/person including supervision, movie, bus transp,)rtation, snack, three games of bowling and shoe rental. Special instructions: Bring a swim suit and towel, reading material and bag lunch. DAY 95 - CRAFT-O-RAHA 7:30 - 8:00 a.m. Drop off at Edgewood Pool 8:00 - 9:00 a.m. Swimming i:w - i:i5 a.w. 1likc to Randc= U-r4 9:15 - 5:45 a.m. Reading quiet time/snack 9:45 - 11:30 a.m. Craft project 11:30 - 1:00 p.m. Disney movie/lunch 1:00 - 2:00 p.m. Active games outside 2:00 - 2:15 p.m. Snack 2:15 - 4:15 p.m. Craft 4:15 p.m. Clean-up Fcc ie $!2:00/1.>rcnn including supervision, movie, snacks, craft projects. Special instructions: Bring a swim suit and towel, reading material and bag lunch. Wear old clothes for crafting and bring warm outerwear for games outside. ADDRESS "SCHOOL DAYS OUT" REGISTRATION FORM (W) AMT BIRTH DATE _ _ ZIP DAY 01 I ) DAY 02 j J -5- GOAL This proposed program offers an opportunity for parents to register their school age children) in a fun recreational program of activities during normal workday hours. This program alleviates parental stress of searching for childcare during non -school workdays. This program offers a - good, fun program for children who may otherwise be left alone at home. OBJECTIVES The objectives of this program are to offer a program of daylong _ activities for every day that the Mounds View School District f621 schedules a non -school day which is normal business days excluding Christmas, Thanksgiving and New Years days. The program dates correspond to the vacation days established by the School ?, District. - TARGET POPULATION This program is specifically designed for school age children 6 - 12 years old whose parent(s) work and do noL have alternative daycare arrangements for school vacation days. This proposal is written -with the assumption of 30 participants for budgetary statistics 'but .can be altered to accommodate any number of participants. L METHODOLOGY A program of activities will be distributed to families via the City Newsletter and flyers distributed through the schools. Interested persons can register his/her children) for as many of the (lays -as needed. -The offerings will be pub'icized quarterly and will fallow the sci,00l's schedule of events. The prograd•ihformation will include a schedule of activities.as shown on the attached flyer. The schedule will include active and passive activities and will feature special events -such as trips, guests or parties. TIMETABLE The timetable includes a ccr,-,'-`^ --chool year of school vacation _ days. The first etep is to design the program activities and hire supervisors. The second step is'tb advertise the program by two successful methods: 1. City Newsletter - This newsletter is distributed to every resident in mounds View via the U. S. Postal Service. 2. Flyers - Flyers distributed through the schools is a direct link to the very children that this program is to serve. -6- The third step is to register participants. Registrations are received in person, by mail, or through a City Hall drop box. The fourth step is to implement the program. The fifth step will be accomplished in two segments. Evaluations _ will be held for each particular activity day and another evaluation encompassing the entire program. EVALUATION Three interactions will be used to evaluate the program. ,. 1. The participants will be asked to an evaluation of each day of activities to ensure that the activities are enjoyed. Because some of the younger children may have limited reading and writing skills, the evaluation questions will be asked by a non -leader staff member. Participant replies will be recorded. .+;.•,;,-�. Staff .leaders will evaluate each individual program and the program as a whole to document shortcomings and highlights for the purpose of improvement. 3. Parents will be. sgnt an -evaluation form along with a stamped and addressed envelope. Feedback including convenience, activity selection, supervision, facilities and cost will be requested. . , The administrative staff will distribute, collect, survey and (" document the -evaluation of the individual activity days and the program as a whole. The evaluation process will determine whether or not the need for school age childcare is met by this program. PERSONNEL The program development will be administered by the Director of the Parks, Recreation and Forestry Department. This individual has over 18 years of youth programming and leadership experience. The indi- vidual proprams'of daylong activities will be lead by an activity supervisor and aides. The supervisor will be required to have a minimum of five years of recreational leadership experience. The aides will be required to have two years of recreational leadership experience. Both the supervisor and aides are required to attend a recreational leadership workshop which is held every summer through the Minnesota Recreation and Park Association. The supervisor and aides will also attend staff meetings prior to each activity day or _ series to review the activities, schedule Ind n..d,. ..-_-tPu__-a needs.- _ _ -7- FEES Fees will reflect the typical cost of daily childcare, $12.00/day. However, the program of activities will include special events which normally are not offered through typical daycare. For instance, swimming, trips, and crafts are extras which are included in the daily fee. Parents unable to pay the fee will be encouraged to pay what they can. A "scholarship" will then be given to make up the cost difference. This "scholarship" will be offset with the administra- tion monies available though this grant for the program. In:arested participants will be registered regardless of their inability to pay• C READ INSTRUCTIONS ON REYERSE BEFORE COMPLETING FORM WITE a 1ELLOe - Children's Trust Fund PIXX - Grantee saw of Applicant Agency rity of Mounds View 2401 highway 10 Street ' rsss Mounds View MN 55112 City, state, lip Children's Trust Fund BUDGET REOLEST/EKPEIAITDRE REPORT CIF, VI -A 333 Sibley Street, Suite 567 St. Paul, M SS101 I6121 296-KIDS Leave Blank -- OFFICIAL USE MLY NA6 iv"e"rfo Yar ' Md venders blrplp La rytaaara(dMdetltiiM . Dept DlrWpn I 37@gw. _ me'3f(ftLP-0. 0610rt Parmeni amount �oaa Gap IL ..Far CC2 e , IlnnWu receh'ed) "codes 1 P"mg Title IMnbY aeruh ilW ma q MaNe tlaan liarebl 1. L�YYFEOFREPORT: JChool's Out Days , WHIN , ,a a»* In POP" , �` oBudgal Budat and payment OW area le Mfeby seeoeXnended. - OBwanRe+tomF� OAdraae Psynrni R,pu,Requestear:rant 10/1/88 — 4/30/89 TranuWar. date anumDnr Dept audgl1ta011dtWtea OEapenditas Repal Expend1tcan OFinai Expendwr Report Peelod: 1 0/1/88 tp 6/1/89 IL GKOGET/E%PENOITUREITEARS Ir.•LIeD LIRE liFll TOf1lL5_ ToG1 ' ouarterl; Children's I _ Private Private Cath Anlua Bud t Expenditu COST ITEMS f TrII.t Fme Federal state County SM n Cash on Hand fm Prcvsous Grant Tear , Gsh Recelred This Grant Year Expendl turca this 6rent Tear Balance on Nand r rnn/r Wl m W an, N r+r rro,4epr e.e FIc ct rector Date 16 nnrM,nl�hTOTA.FundsI^' 1 itl"""tes"'M"11e°"e"l sunaanxnt officer —Date r 1"Ifid Support nn., ea ,..r.er.+ rs roNR.aI• hhMWdm, nnvme+ervha -9- 1 BUDG:. NARRATIVE The budget is written on an estimation of 30 participants. STAFFING DIRECTOR MAINTENANCE I ADM. ASST. [SUPERVISOR LIFEGUARD AIDES POSITION HOURLY WAGE TOTAL HOURS JOB DUTIES Director $15.00/hour 30 hours Program design and ($450.00) evaluation, staff hiring, training, equipment and facility arrangements. Adm. Asst. $11.75/hour 30 hours Frogram marketing, ($352.50) d;cumentatioregistrationand evaluation. Maintenance •$12..00/hour Ihr/d22 Facility maintenance. 00) Supervisor $8.00/hour 9 hrs/day Program activity _ x22 implementation, leader- ($1,585.00) ship, and evaluation. _,; Aides (2) $5.00/hour 9 22s/day Activity leadership and evaluation ($1,980.00) Lifeguards (2) $6.00/hour ($2646 x00;2 Lifeguarding swims Total wages of $4,894.00 is estimated for the proposed 22 days of "School Days Out" activities. -10- FACILITY COSTS Building electricity $4.30/day x 22 = $ 94.60 Building supplies; toilet paper, soap and towels $1.00/day .. 22 = $ 22.00 $ 1.16.60 BUS RENTALS- :.Ov^ rental charge for 22 trips = $ 1,870.00 TRIP ADMISSION CHARGES 22 trips at $4.00/trip/person x 30 children MISCELLANEOUS COST Snacks $1.00/day x 30 children x 22 times Crafts $1.00/day x 30 children x 22 times Movies $.10/day x 30 children x 22 times LINE ITEM AMOUNT FUNDING SOURCE = $ 2,640.00 $ 660.00 $ 660.00 _ $ 66.00 $ 1,386.00 Staffing $ 4,894.00 $1,330.50 City $3,564.00 Trust Fund Facility Costs $ 116.60 $ 116.60 City Bus rentals $ 1,870.00 $1,870.00 Trust Fund Trip Admission Charges $ 2,640.00 $2,640.00 Fces Miscellaneous Costs $ 1,386.00 $1,386.00 Fees $10,906.00 $5,472.50 $5,434.00 How will this program proceed if a grant is not received from the Children's Trust Fund? If this program is not funded, it will still be offered to the public. However, the participants fees will need to cover the full cost of the program. For this reason, the fees will be higher than if the program received grant funding. The higher fees may be restrictive to low income or one parent families, the very clientele this program is designed to serve. Grant monies will insure that the tees can remain low in order w attract lowar income or one parent working families. In subsequent years, it is anticipated that the program will be established and in high demand and therefore greater maximum numbers will be offered providing more revenue to assist in covering the program so that the activities are a break-even venture. The whole idea is to offer a great program for the demand at a break--ven cost. For instance, thirty children per, bus at a cost of $85.00/excursion is $2.80/person whereas 60 children per bus at a cost of $85.00,excurs'.on is $1.40. Likewise movies and bulk prices for crafts, snacks and beverages and other group rates decrease with larger numbers. -11- CTF-I-B CHILDREN'S TRUST FUND 0-4 Program Name: "School's out Days" I Counties to be Served by this Program: Ramsey County students attending School District #621 elementary schools including Pinewood Sunnvside. St. tnhn's Potentially Potentially Number of Clients to be Served: 600 Children 600 ,adults *1/3 of the school age children enrolled in the three schools named above. This is a x primhry secondary prevention program. THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS ARE TO BE INCLUDED IN THE APPENDIX OF THE APPLICATION: 1. Evidence of Non -Profit Status. 501 (c)(3): Yes, x Not Applicable 2. Evidence of Workers' Compensation Insurance: Fu _ x Yes. No x 3. Evidence of certified compliance from the Commissioner of Human T' Rights regarding Affirmative Action policies (M Stat. 363.073), s or a corporation policy: Yes, —x No As of this date, the City has not been required to submit such policies. �'• 4. Assurances and Agreements (CTF form V-A, B, C), signed: x Yes, - No �M i 5. Current Organizational Chart, indicating the proximity of this program to other programs in your agency: �` x _ Yes, No 6. Evidence of Federal Identification Number: { x Yes, No Fed. ID # 41-6008912 7. Eevidence of MN Tax Identification Number: x Yes, No MN Tax ID #9034948 a olPsldldfAPJc�WldJc Rfdfe4�cicsfeJdlAJ2PrJc�fNrNldfdfdfa@fdfePdJef2Laeuuaaar�e,�,���-..-,.-.........--_ _ _-- MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF =REVEN SALES AND USE TALC PERMIT q OUNOSVIEW CITY OF 9034948 Nuunu scANo uu401 HWY 1012/22/75 2401 MN 55112 ST PA T PAUL wlussuso THIS PERMIT IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY CONTAINED IN MINNESOTA St UNTIL REVOKED OR CANCELLED. IT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE AND 15 VALID ONLY . NAME IT IS ISSUED AND FOR THE TRANSACTION OF BUSINESS AT: THE_ PLACE 1 r .: _______ -faraf�rararraGnPcfE�eRfd.(cia�: CITY OF MN 55112 J_ e 175491A.06 AND IS VALID of '• s.� '' )R3HE PERSON IN WHOSE L®IATED ON THE PERMIT. "F , 1 F sa �y .-: s s :t '�.'"'","s DM41lSSIONER OF REVENUE' iaamr�araararaarnaPu+rJAl@IFSdT' Y+' ttl yp 1 � -Hf` Y } 1987 LONG TERM FINANCIAL PLAN Page Thirty -One APMOI% 'A' ADVL'pR/ m11IS.I0tSI-- -h[ta i P¢titiaD �'-P1wLLnp AMPMSIAATM CiuU le N7v SNIlTMY Pfl67R'!O'4ST PINAf2 PAM, ROOY.I Tm DIAQ.'IfMI A,'a PORMW OlPH.10X PA71CT. DPPIC961 Mr -um MY XtUMIAEW WpNTUTPOWL Corn /OD7✓ff. VPLU Pf m= CIST (o L AODATIO9 PA16�TP/E CTiF[ mcr. PAIR`TIlE ranan svrP I -iw —i _m H HUN- tPIiS Ftll90N I-tac__- Dili K PIBflC DSPFA��-' IOMCyR1TY HC[ImI �'SE 9QDIlG POBLTC S�E'l.i.'_�.� DPPTONL - llum a A11MI®ML4r.': r.Ai Puma ... PID.90P! mul y we r? 0 (Name of Agency) BY SIGNATURE, THE AUTHORIZED OFFICIAL AGREES AND ASSURES THAT: 1. Services will be provided in accordance with State and Federal laws, rules and policies. 2. The agency will comply with State and Federal requirements for equal op- portunity employment. 3, cThe agency will onfidentiality ocomply client/patient information requirements relating to 4. The privacy of the service recipient will be maintained. ihout rgad to ae, sex* race, religion, 5 Servicemarital sstatus, parity, oorwill be provIded wpresenceoorrdegreegof disability except as oth2rW1se required by law. 6. No residency requirements for services other than state residence, will be imposed. 7. Services shall not be denied based on inability to pay. p. Arrangements shall be made for communications to take place in a lan- g�„ga undArgt.nnd by the recipient. l provide services th andards g the Minnesota lDepartment of Public nSafety niprogram The agency andstandarrdsoftacceptedopro- fessional groups. 10. The Minnesota Department of Public Safety will be provided, upon re- quest, with one copy of any contract executed as part of the project. 11. The agency will report accomplishments of the project to the Executive Director of the Children's Trust Fund. Such reports will be submitted no 'later than 45 days after the completion of the grant year. The re- ports shall be suitable for sharing of information with other projects. 12. Project funds shall not be used for programs and services involving ter- tiary prevention. 13. Cash payments shall not o intended recipients or to program personnel. 14. Grant funds shall not be used for purchase or improvement of land or fa - CI litles. 15. Grant funds shall not be used for purchase of equipment costing more than $300.00 and with a useful life exceeding one (1) year. 16. The agency will comply with all standards relating to fiscal account- ability that apply to the Minnesota Department of Public Safety specifi- cally: a. Budget revisions with justification will be sunitted tl he Execu- tivo Director of the Children's Trust Fund for prior approval whenev3r changes are made in the objectives to be met in the child abuse and neglect prevention program. -W An expenditure report will be completed and filed with the Chil- dren's Trust Fund no later than 15 days following the end of each grant year usr2.;r. c. Program funds dra used as payment for services only after - thlyd-party paysonts, or private fnsur&.:e are utilfzed. (f d. Program financial management systems will provide for: (1) accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial status of the program. (2) records which identify adequately the source and application of funds for program acftivites. These records are to - contain information pertaining to program awards and aaeno- _ rizations, obligations, unobligated balances, liabilities (encumbrances), outlays, and income. (3) effective r��+r_7 ^ ^. t`a aCCGunCauiiity for all funds, property and other assets. Program applicants are to ade- quately safeguard such assets and assure that they are used solely for authorized purposes. (4) comparison of actual obligations with budget amounts for each activity. (5) accounting records which are supported by source documenta- tion. (6) audits which will he made by or at the direr n of the Min- nesota Department of Public Safety, the Leg,s,ativo Auditor, or any independent auditor designated by the grantor. The grantor, or its auditor designee, shall have access to the grantee's records during reasonable office hours, as may be necessary to conduct an audit. Application is hereby made for furling in the amount and for the purposes stated herein. By signature, the Authorized Official agrees and has the au- thority to agree to comply with conditions and reporting requirements, consis- tent with applicable Mi;_asota Department of Public Safety Rules and Minnesota Statutes. In addition, by signature below, the Authorized Official assures full compliance with all items stated herein. NIiIiORIZED OFFICIAL: