The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAgenda Packets - 1988/07/05CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW CITY COUNCIL AGENDA SESSION JULY 5, 1988 7:00 P.M. 1. Presentation of 1987 Financial Statements by Rob Tautges Of Voto, Tautges and Redpath 2. Discussion of AMM Request Regarding Participation in MLC Lawsuit (Received at June 20, 1988 Agenda Session) 3. Discussion of Dates for 1989 Festival In The Park 4. Discussion of 1988 Festival In The Park 5. Discussion of Harstad Development Proposal; Greenfield Estates P.C. #213-87 6. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding 1988 Clean - Up Day Profit/Loss Statement 7. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding Minor Subdi- vision for W. E. Rosenquist, 8380 Spring Lake Road, P.C. #245-88 8. Consideration of Staff Memorandum Regarding Address Change for Odas Newton, 8319 Groveland Road, irdinance No. 446 9. Discussion of Ordinance No. 445 Amending the Municipal Code of Mounds View by Amending Chapter 40 10. Consideration of Appraisal Report for 8100 Groveland Road Approved: 6/27/88 PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW APPROVED RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA Regular Meeting May 23, 1988 Mounds View City Hall 2401 Hwy. 10, ?Sounds View, MN 55112 The Mounds View City Council was called t-) order by 1. Call to Mayor Linke at 7:00 PM on Monday, May 23, 1988. Order The Pledge of Allegiance was said. MEMBERS PRESENT: Counci.lmembers Hankner, Wuori, Quick, Blanchard and Mayor Linke. ALSO PRESENT: City Attorney Meyers and Clerk/ Adman strator Pauley. Motion/Second: Blanchard/Hankner to approve the May 9, minutes as presented. 5 ayes 0 nays Paul Milke, 5116 Brighton Lane, inquired how much the City asked the State Legislature for in grants and local government aid, and how much was given. Clerk/Administrator Pauley explained grants must be applied for individually, as they are not state aid. The preliminary figure is a 40 percent increase in local government aid, which would be $233,000, but that does not mean the City's revenues are increased by that amount, and he explained the process used. He added they do not know yet what has happened with homestead credit, which has been changed, and that could have a significant impact on the City. Councilmember Hankner explained the City has not gone to the Legislature with a formal re.,jest, but rather stay in touch with their local Legislators. Clerk/Administrator Pauley explained the lobbying process used and added that they always hope for more, but they never know until the end what will happen. 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Poll Call 4. Approval of Minutes: May 9, 1988 Motion Carried 5. Residents Requests and 7: Comments from; the Floor Mounds View City Council May 23, 1988 Regular Mee,.ng Page Two Mayor Linke closed the regular meeting and opened 6. Public HeAng the first public heaping at 7:07 PM. Considera -- n of Request for Clerk/Administrator Pauley reviewed the issue before Extension of the Council and showed an overhead map of the area Building and tiie surrounding property. He explained that Permit for in reviewing the request for an extension of the 8100 Groveland building permit, they have discussed the possible Road use of the lot for access to the back of the property for subdivision and development of the back lots. He stated Staff is asking the Council for direction on how to proceed, and he added that a lot split has not been granted, and if applied for, would have to be done at the time of the permit. Mike Hurley identified himself as the attorney repre- senting Julian Johnson, owner of the property. He explained Mr. Johnson is out of the State and was not able to come back for this hearing. fie stated they understand that when the original building permit was issued, a lot split was not requested or approved, and that while their original intent was to develop only the small, front portion, without the split they would be dealing with the entire parcel. The Council questioned when Mr. Johnson would ask for a lot split. Mr. Hurley responded that at this time he has no intention of asking for a lot split, but has only requested an extension of the building permit at this time. He added that while Mr. Johnson had misunderstood the lot split issue at the time the original permit was granted, it is acceptable to him. Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported a previous owner had applied for a building permit approximately four years ago, which the Council denied at that time. ,Mr. Hurley pointed out Mr. Johnson has a buildable'lot and he does not see why the City should deny him a permit to build on his property. He added if the City is inclined to acquire the property for a future road, he is willing to talk, and he would like direction from the Council at this time as to what their intentions are, as this has been discussed for years and it is time that a decision be made. He added Mr. Johnson's intention is to construct a home and sell the entire piece,'or he may possibly request a lot split at a later date. Councilmember Hankner asked what the market value of the lot is. Mounds View City Council Regular Meeting ---------------------- Mr. Hurley replied they have done some estimating end looking at comparables, and as far as the s,nall parcel is concerned, it should be valued at $35,000, and they do not have a price yet for the entire parcel. Councilmember Hankner clarified that if the smaller parcel is built on, the entire parcel would remain on the tax rolls. Mr. Hurley asked if any parcels in that area were land- locked presently. Clerk/Administrator Pauley, 'Plied the__ were, and without a road, they would remain so. Mr. Hurley pointed out this is not unique, then, to Mr. Johnson. He added there is potential there for c holdonto lthe olot oVu to to wait andseewhatsthelCity does, but his concern is that something be done, as the Council has sat on this for some time. He explained he had sent a letter to Attorney Meyers in January, requesting the extension, with either a yes or no answer, and five months later they are no further. Councilmember Hankner asked if Mr. Johnson would still want to go ahead if the building Permit extension does ^ot include the Uot split. Mr. Hurley replied he does, yet if the City wants to acquire it, he has plans on how the property could be developed. Clerk/Administrator Pauley explained if the City acquires it, they would have to take all 77.5' of frontage, all the way through the lot, which would leave them an excess of Jp to hopefully sell off to adjoining property owners. Bill Frits, 8072 Long Lake Road, questioned the value or cost of the property to the City. Mayor Linke explained they are just looking at possi- bilities now, and would need solid numbers before taking any action. Clerk/Administrator Pauley stated the only decision the Council would make this evening was whether or not to extend the building permit, and if they don't, they would have to instruct Staff to begin the process of acquisition, and an appraisal would have to be done. k0Mayor Links stated that a denial of the building permit extension does not mean the Council is going to purchase the property. May 23, 1989 Page Three Mounds View City Council Regular Meeting Mr. Hurley pointed out if the City denies the permit extension, that is a taking, restriction and denial of the use of the property, and he would *?ope the City would consider that. Attorney Meyers reviewed the alternatives that are a:•ailable, with a study of whether the extension of Knollwood could be developed without 'dr. Johnsons property. He explained they have heard runny proposals over the years. He added they could approve the lot split %ith the agreement that the Cit✓ could acquire the large back lot for use in a future road development. He added that if the permit extension is denied, the City could be liable for denial of the use of the property. He added they could allow the issuance of the building permit extension but still look at the parcel in back for development of a cur -de -sac. He further added that the extension of the timeline would be up to Mr. Hurley. Mr. Hurley pointed out everything has been discussed time and time again, and his client is very anxious to get on with developing this property. Councilmember Blanchard asked what harm there would be in granting an extension, as the lot split has not been asked for or granted. Mr. Hurley pointed out the building permit was originally issued in June of 1987, and a statement was written right on it by Building Inspector Jim Tobias that it would be extended to the Spring of 1988. He also reminded the Council of the letter sent in January, informing them of the request for the extension.and requesting that a decision be made in a timely manner. Attorney Meyers advised that if the Council grants the building permit extension, it would eliminate the eastern access, and that is what the issue tonight really is. Mayor Links closed the public hearing cnd reopened the regular meeting at 7:34 PM. Councilmember Hankner stated that i{ the extension is granted and the Council is to talk to Mr. Johnson about a future lot split, it would require additional time to discuss it with him. Attorney Meyers advised the Council must decide if the City can really ase Mr. Johnson's parcel. He added that if a lot split is granted, the back portion could ultimately go back to the City for taxes in another ten years or so. Mayor Links stated he was opposed to anything but the east exit, due to the health, safety and welfare issue of the future development. He pointed out there is also May 23, 1988 Page Four 0 Mounds '!iew City Council Regular Meeting a 12" water main on Groveland which could be till into. He stated the best way to plan for the future is to deny this and look at the acquisition of a strip of the property. Councilmember Blanchard stated she was against_ tying up the citizens tax dollars on a "maybe" project that might not happen for 25 years, if ever, as the majority of the property owners there do not want a road to go through. Mayor Links replied there is money left from the Silver Lake Woods project, which comes from the gas tax, and would not be tying up new money. Councilmember Blanchard responded that either way, the tax payers are paying for it. Councilmember Hankner stated the City could end up paying for it anyway, if they deny the permit extension and it ands up in litigation. Attorney Meyers advised the Court could assess damages for the denial of the use of the property. The money could theoretically be recovered if a road is put in in the future, but they would have to prove that the market value of each property increased by that l i 35essment. He added they could start condemnation proceedings for the road, but it may or may not be to the City's benefit. He added the City could acquire the entire pared and sell off the buildable lots to a developer. Councilmember Hankner stated that sounds like a terrific gamble, as they could end up in very lengthy negotiations and still end up paying out a lot of money. She added she feels Mr. Johnson has put the Council in an unfair position as hi is not available to meet with them, and they do not know where he stands on many items, and shy does not know if rdr. Hurley can answer for Mr. Johnson. She furti.2r stated the date of this meeting was postponed for Mr. Johnson's convenience and he chose r,ot to meet with the Council. Attorney Meyers advised the Council decide if an east access is necessary to go from there. Councilmember Blanchard pointed out no one has come in with any proposals for development on any portion, and she has a real problem voting on if Is, and's and maybes. Councilmember Quick stated that when the last permit was kmw denied the policy was set, and they must look to the future to allow for development. May 23, 1988 Page Five Mounds View City Council Regular Meeting Councilmember Wuori stated she agreed, and planning is involved in putting a road in at a future time, which is always "iffy". She added they must abide by the health, safety and welfare issues, and the eastern access takes care of all those points. Councilmember Hankner stated she could agree with having Staff get appraisals and begin negotiations with Mr. Johnson. At the request of the Council, Fir. Hurley stated the Preliminary price of the front portion would be $35,000, the second piece directly west would be $20,000, or $75,000 for the entire parcel. Maynr Linke asked tf Mr. Johnson would be willing to negotiate because if the road was put in, it would open up two lots in back to Mr. Johnson. He added that the Council was not prepared to sign any purchase agreement at this time. Councilmember Hankaer suggested Staff be instructed to go ahead and get an appraisal and talk to b7r. Johnson. Motion/Second: Linke/Quick to authorize Staff to have one apprai—r-aT performed by the City's appraiser and commence negotiations for th=_ possible acquisition of the property, and discuss with Mr. Johnson possible points for negotiation. 5 ayes 0 nays Attorney Meyers advised the appraisal be done for the small parcel, the extension and the entire parcel. Mayor Linke closer. the regular meeting and openei the second public hearing at 8:02 PM Clerk/Administrator Pauley explained the first reading of Ordinance No. 441 had been held on May 9. This would allow a conditional use permit within a B-2 district for a veterinary and animal clinic, with stipulations as set forth. He added Dr. Barcus has applied for the conditional use permit to operate a veterinary clinic at the Silver View Plaza, and he reviewed the five conditions that would be placed on the operation, if the permit is granted. He added =� once it is approved, there would be a 30 day puolication phase, and then a 30 day waiting period before it would go into effect. Mayor Linke closed the public hearing and reopened the regular meeting at 8.05 p.m. May 23, 1988 Page Six ------------ Motion Carried`i 7. Public Hearing: Consideration Of Conditional Use Permit for Kevin Barcus, 2554 Highway 10 V Mounds View City Council Regular Meeting ------------ May 23, 1988 --------------- Page Seven Motion/Second: nand: Quick/nlanchard to have the second readMuing dCodeoOf 8. 2nd the nicipaland 49i, amending 40 Moundsn of nview by Reading and Adoption amending Chapter entitled "Zoning", and waive the reading. of Ordinance t No. 441 - Councilmember Hankner - aye Councilmember Wuori - aye Councilmember Quick.- aye Councilmember Blanchard - aye Mayor Linke - aye Motion Carried, Motion/Second: Wuori/Quick to approve Resolution Neff. approving 9. Consideration"-: a conditional use permit for a veterinary animal clinic for Kevin Barcus, 2554 Highway 10, of Resolution;.' and waive the reading. No. 2328 - 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried- Clerk/Administrator Pauley read the items on the proposed consent agenda, as well as on the ap3nded consent agenda. 10. Approval of Consent Motioond: Hankner/Blanchard Agenda to approve the consent agenda as amended, and waive the reading �y of the resolutions. V 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried, Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported the grant has been received from Ramsey County for 11. Authorization-= recycling within the City, which will begin on June 21, and be third of Contract " every Tuesday of the month thereafter. Agreement Mayor Links reported they are still looking for block captains in with Super - cycle, Inc. certain areas, whose responsibility it would be to for Recycling put out reminder signs. Services Motion/Second: Quick/Hankner to authorize the Mayor and Clerk Administrator to enter into a contract agreement between the City Of Mounds View and Super - cycle, Inc. for recycling services. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried ator Pauley ofetheACityltorhave iaintenancecontractsonall ailLed it shractice 12. Approval of office equipment. He added Staff will pursue Maintenance a refund on the service not rendered b the getting Agreement with contractor. Y previous Twin City Business Computers, Inc. Mounds View City Council May 23, 1988 Regular Meeting Page Eight ----------------------------------------------------------------------- MotiojY Second: Blanchard/Wuori to approve a maintenance C. agreement with Twin City Business Computers, Inc, for maintenance of the Philips word processing system, at a cost of $2,014.00 to be charged to account No. 100- 4190-313. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported the Planning 13. Consideration Commission has recommended approval of this minor of Resolution subdivision, and it is in compliance with the City No. 2325 code. Motion/Second: Quick/Hankner to approve Resolution No. 2325, approving a minor subdivision for RoLert Petersen, 2185 Lambert Avenue, Mounds View Planning Case No. 237-88, and waive the reading. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported the Council had 14. Consideration - previously held a hearing on this request, and he of Resolution reviewed the reasons for the proposed denial of the No. 2327 appeal by Dynamic Designers. He added the proposed resolution of denial has been prepared with the, advise of the City Attorney, and he read the proposed resolution. Motion/Second: Hankner/Quick to approve Resolution No. 2327, denying the variance appeal for Dynamic Designers, 7656/7660 Woodlaw:. Drive, Mounds View Planning Case No. 138-83. 5 ayes u nays Motion Carried. Clerk/Administrator Pauley reviewed the problems with IS. Authorize $Eft the sanitary sewer line on Silver Lake Road, and to Prepare asked Council authorization for the preparation of Plans and plans and specs. He added he had received a call Specs for from Dan Boxrud, of SEH, pointing out the soil Silver Lake boarings requested ty the Council would be an Road Sanitary additional $4,000, with the work to be done by Sewer Repair Twin City Testing. There was discussion among the Council as to how many borings were to be done, and whether it would be just in front of the apartments. Councilmember Quick stated the idea of the soil boarings was for an added margin of safety for when the repairs are made in the future. Mounds View City Council May 23, 1988 Regular Meeting Page Nine Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported there had been a water rain break at 7280 Silver Lake Road recently. and a good deal of peat was encountered during the repair. Ric Minetor, Public Works Director, explained what happened with the water main, and he advised the soil borings would be money well spent, as it is much less expensive than going back and repairing houses later. Motion/Second: Quick/Iluori to .uthorize Short- E ott-Hen rickson, Inc, to prepare plans and specs for the Silver Lake Road sanitary sewer repair at a cost not to exceed $12,500, and authorize Twin City Testing to pertcrm the soil borings at an additional $4,000 in cost. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Clerk/Administrator Pauley explained the City has 16. Authorize been experiencing difficulty in achieving acceptable Study of Water water quality from Water Treatment Blant No. 1, Treatment and an analysis needs to be done, which will give Plant No. 1 them direction on how to proceed. Motion/Second: Hankner/Blanchard to authorize a stu y o Water Treatment Plant No. 1 by SERCO Labs at a cost not to exceed $3,000. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried' Clerk/Administrator Pauley read Resolution No. 17. Consideration 2330 and Resolution No. 2331, commending Gerald of Resolutions,' Simon and Francis Doll for their 20 years of service No. 2:30 and to the Fire Department. 2331 motion/Second: Blanchard,"vankner to adopt Resolutions No. 2333 and 2331, commending Gerald Simon and Francis Doll for 20 years of service each to the Fire Department. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Mayor Links directed Staff to have plaques made. to be presented to both individuals at a future Council meeting. Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported the City has 18. Cons dei.4tien acted as a sponsoring agency for the past three years of Request by for the school district, and they have been requested School Distric to do so again. He added there is no cost to the Student City for this, and the City is merely tna sponsoring Services agency, with no further obligation. Coordinator Mounds View City Council Regular Meeting May 23, 1988 ------------------- _..----------------- Page Ten Motion/Second: Hankner/Quick to authorize Staff to he for Studnt Services Coordinatortto lgranttappliicatior. fileothe with the Minnesota Juvenile Justice Advisory Committee. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Clerk/Administrator Pauley reviewed the need for Change Order No. 2 for 19' Consideration . the Mounds View Business Park. He explained it woulC correct an of Mounds View error in Change Order No. 1, as well as replace the rip -rap around Business Park the perimeter of the storm water detention/retention pord Change Order with sod. No. 2 and Pay Estimate No. 2 Motion/Second: Hankner/Blanchard to approve Change Order No. 2 and authorize the payment of pay estimate No. 2 in the amount of $133,414.81. to be charged to the Mounds View Business Park Tax Increment Fund. 5 ayes 0 nays M,)tion Carried; Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported the Council had pr^•piously received Review and a proposed amendment to Blaine's20. comprehensive plan, for a sports facility the Comment of to construct north on Radissor. Road. He added Staff has reviewed it in detail Blaine �^^�� and feels there would be minimal if any impact on Mounds View, Plan Amendment PlaComn Amendment other than an increase in traffic, which would not be at rush times. He added the Planning Commission agrees with Staff. Motion/Second: Qu.i-k/Hankner to authorize Clerk/ Administrator Pauley to send a letter to the Met Council, stating they have no comment or, the plan. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Ric Minetor reviewed his memo of May 19 regarding computer hardware for 21. Consideration pavement management. Of Computer Motion Becond: authorize the.pur- Hardware for c ase o computer hardware for pavement.managemen�, from 'Zeros International'at'a'.cost'not-to'exceed=`-1 Pavement Management - $3,749, to be charged to account no. 100.4270=703000.- 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried 1988 Mou-,ds View City Council May 23, Regular Meeting Page Eleven -------------- ------------------ --------------------------------------— Police Chief Ramacher presented the statistics for 22. First Quarter, January through March, 1088, noting there had been 1988 Dept. no significant change. He added they had received Head Reports :. delivery of the last of the three new squad cars earlier in the day and should have them all on the road soon. He explained when F.dgewood reopens with sixth through eighth grade students, it will have some impact on the Police Department, but probably not as much as when it had older students there. Finance Director Brager reviewed the activities of the Finance Department for the First quarter. He explained the audit report would be late, due to a medical leave in that department. He added they have been very busy and are now working on the long—range financial planning and putting together a vehicle and equipment replacement list. Park and Rec Director Saarion reviewed the winter activity statistics and projects which were accomplished. Public Works Director Minetor reviewed the activities of the Building, Public Works, and Sewer and Water departments and their plans for the remainder of the year. Attorney Meyers had no report. 23. Report of Attorney Councilmember Hankner reportei she will be meeting 24. Reports of with a group of interested people on May 25 regarding Councilmembers the proposed Environmental Quality.Task Force, for a Councilmember brainstorming session, and they hope to came up with a Hankner draft of how the task force is to be established and : wh;t the responsibilities would be. She added that any- one who is interested in it is welcome to attend. Councilmember Hankner reported she would be meeting with Staff and residents from the Silver View Pond area the morning of May 27, and anyone interested was elcome to attend. Councilmember Hankner states she was impressed with the organization of the Pinewood Playground group, and they shoulu be congratulated for their success and leadership. Mounds View City Council Regular Meeting Councilmember Hankner suggested inviting the State representatives to core in and meet with the Council and provide an update on the tax bill. She stated it would be helpful to the Council, as they will be starting the budget process soon. 7t was the concensus of the Council to have Staff contact them and sec up a time for them to come in. Councilmember Hankner sported on a news arti..ls that had appeared in the Star Tribune on May 23 regarding school district budgets and the process they follow, and she suggested inviting the Super - I ntenaent to come in and make a presentation to the Council on their budgeting process. She added we do not seem to communicate well, and it could be helpful to the Council in the budgeting process.She suggested setting up a special night and inviting other local Councils to join in. Motion/Second: Hankner/Linke to direct Staff to contact the school district and request a meeting, at their convenience, and make it a formal meeting of the Council, for brcadoast, and have them present their budget. 5 ayes 0 nay: Mayor Linke stated he would like e. copy of the budget in advance. Councilmember Hankner stated the City shoul? send their budget document= to the school district also. Councilmember Wuori stated she could not praise the Pinewood group enough for the work they did. Councilmember Quick stated the Pinewood playground construction was an unbelievable project and experience. Councilmember Blanchard reported U., 30th anniversary buttons would be available from local merchants soon. She also asked the status of the meeting on the Harstad proposal. Clerk/Administrator. Pauley reported no one showed up for the meeting, so one did not occur. Mayor Linke reported he too felt the Pinewood playground experience was u�ibelievable. He also reminded everyone that recycling begins on June 21. May 23, 1988 Page Twelve Motion Ca3,3ed Councilmember Wuori Councilmember Quick Councilmember Blanchard Mayor Links Mounds View City Council Regular Meeting May 23, 1988 ---------------------- ---- Page Thirteen ------------------- County Commissioner McCarty updated the Council on the status of the library and the meeting he had just attended. He reported problems have been encountered regarding City participati:n in land acquisition, which need to be cleared up, specifically with the City of Shoreview. Motion/Second: Linke/Blanchard to request the Library BoZ,�d of Trustees move ahead on the items already approved, to avoid an increase in cost due to a time delay. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Clerk/Administrator Pauley thanked and cammended the 25. Report of Public Works department for the assistance they gave to the Pinewood Playground, and specifically Steve to Dazenhki and Mike Ulrich, who worked as volunteers on Administrator Saturday. Clerk/Administrator Pauley reviewed the memo of May 23 from the Building Inspector regarding tha final inspection of 520i Program Avenue. He added that in addition to the five items listed which must be completed for the certificate of occupancy, he would add that landscaping be completed for the building. Motion/Second: Quick/Hankner to approve the issuance o a certi ficate of occupancy for 5201. Program Avenue, Clinch -On -Corners, with the six conditions listed. 5 ayes 0 nays Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported they had had the first meeting with Ramsey County regarding the sanitary sewer repair to be done on Silver Lake Road and negotiations are progressing positively. Clerk/Administrator Pauley advised that witn the purciase of the former Smith Transfer property by Churchill Trucking and installation of new tanks, they have dis- covered leakage had occurred, but it would have been Prior to 1984, since the tanks have been empty since that time. He explained the concern is with the fuel oil tank, as that has been i:z use and is showing signs of leakage. He added it was going to be moved today, and he would keep the Cuuncil appraised of the situation. f: Motion Mounds View City Council Regular Meeting Mayor Linke adjc•urned the meeting at 9:411% pm. May 23, 1988 Page Fourteen 26. AdjournmeI �i' DATE APPROVED: 6/27/88_;-, JJ-� PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL lJ APPROVEQ, 44 RAMSEY COUNTY,, MINNES TA Regular Meeting June 13, 1988 Mounds View City Hall_;:i Hwy. 10, Mounds View, MN 55112:x•;` -------2401 -------------------------------- - -------------------------------i:'- The Mounds View City Council was called to order by , 1. Call to Mayor Linke at 7:00 PM on Monday, J'ine 13, 1988. The Pledge of Allegiance was said. 2. Pledge of Allegiance MEMBERS PRESENT: Counc.ilmembers Wuori, Quick, 3. Roll Call Blanchard, HaniFner and Mayor Linke. ALSO PRESENT: City Attorney Meyers, Clerk/Admini- strator Pauley, city Planr-r Herman and. Public Works Director Minetor. Counrilmember Hankner asked that approval of the May 4. Approval of';"y. �)23, 1988 minutes be postponed to the next regular Minutes: ^"r l�'meeting, as she had Left her notes in her other May 23, 1988:"'` packet. Motion/Second: Hankner/Quick to table approval of the May 23, 1988 minutes to the next regular meeting on June 27, 1988. 5 ayes 0 .,ays Motion Carrifd Mayor Linke read the resolution of commendation to S. Presentation retiring firefighter Gerald Simon and presented a of P.eA^lution plaqu. of the reE�lution to him. to Gerald Mayor Linke read the resolution of commendation to Simon and Francis Doll:r retiring firefighter Francis Doll and presented a plaque of the resolution to hira Mayor Linke thanked both firefighters, on behalf of the Council and the residents, for their many years of service. William Stewart, of the spring Lake Park Lion's Club 6. Presentation )stated they are willing to put $125,000 into an escrow by William account, for work to be done at Lakeside Park, which Stewart Regarc likely will include a fishing dock for youth and ing Lakeside handicapped people. He explained a committee is being Park formed to plan what should be done. He added that the Lion's Club could potentially donate up to $150,000 Mounds View City Council Regular Meeting ----------------------------- ".•)to $200,000 for the work to be done. The Council expressed their sincere thanks for the donation. Mayor Linke closed the regular meeting and opened the first public hearing at 7:11 PM. Public Works Director Minetor'presented an overhead of the area and review=d the need for a wetland alteration permit. He explained the work is necessary as the sewer flows from Longview Drive to Silver Lake Road and there is no practical alternate route. The replacement is necessitated by th, settlement of the sewer main, as well as the Silver Lake Road sewer main. He added that if the work is approved, it would be completed by August 15. Mayor Linke closed the public hearing and reopened the regular meeting. Mayor Linke closed the regular meeting and opened the second public hearing at 7:16 PM. City Planner Herman presented an overhead map of the )area showing where the Church Upon the Rock is located. She explained that the Planning Commission has recommend- approval of a conditional use permit for a temporary building on the site, to be used as classroom space. She added that at the time the Planning Commission was looking at the temporary building, they discovered the original conditional use permit needed updating, and they would recommend including a stipulation that the total number of students be determined by a ratio of pupils to square feet, with a 1 to 35 sf ratio in the existing building and a 1 to 30 ratio in the temporary building; that they finalize in writing their parking arrangement with Kinder Care; and put up a fence along the western side of the playground, for which they have granted a variance to allow a 5' fence. She explained the reason for grant- ing the variance was that the height was needed, both to keep the students from runnin7 in the street, and to keep balls ^nd other equipmentfrom going cut also. Rlva Minikus, 7959 Red Oak Drive, stated she lives next door to the north, and her house has taken quite a beat- ing from soccer balls, and the fence that is there now does not prevent the problems. She added that she doesn't And the school being there but does not like the children rowing balls against her house, and breaking the fence, or her window. Planner Herman explained the Planning Commission had not addressed the fence on that side of the property as they were not aware there was a Droblem. June 13, 1988 Page Two 7. Public Hearings Wetland Alter- ation Permit for Sanitary Sewer Repair ., 8. Public Hearing: Conditional Use Permit --for Church Up( j the Rock, 7901 Red Oak Drive Mounds ViPw City Council Regular Meeting June 13, 1988 Page Three ------------ ----------------------- 0 Coaa�;ilmember Blanchard expressed concern with the pro- posed fence on the west side blocking the view of traffic. Planner Herman explained it would be a chain - link fence and should not be a problem. Councilmember SPuori reported the church representative had told the Planning Commission they already had their fence but had not bean able to put it up because it was 5' rather than the allowable 4'. : The Pastor of the church, who did not identify himself by name, stated he had been unaware of any problem with Mrs. Minikas's property. Ne explained they have had a problem w,th vandalism, and they had fixed her window as soon as possible. He added they are willing to work With the neighbors. Mayor Linke closed the public hearing and reopened the regular meeting at 7:27 PM. Mayor Linke closed the regular meeting and opened the next public hearing at 7:27 9. Public Heariner PM. Major Subdivi.-_ Planner Herman reviewed the request for replotting of the back sion, Prelimi-: northwest corner of the property, which would change the property line by 206. Approvnary Plat for , Mounds V Mounds View -" Mayor Linke cloned the public hearing and reopened the Business Park' regular meeting at 7:30 PM. Mayor Linke closed the regular meeting and opened the next public. hearing at 7:30 PM. 10. Public Hearing Renewal of Clerk/Administrator Pauley referie .o the calls On -Sale Liquor for service print-out provided by the Police De art- ment, which would public License for Robert Off cover all the liquor license hearings for the evening, and s stated that Staff would recommend the approval of all renewals of liquor licenses on the agenda. He added that Ramsey County had done some under over work at the Mermaid, based upon information, they were given regarding the use of controlled substan_aes, but had found no evidence of use. There were no comments concerning the renewal of the license for Robert's Off lo, so Mayor Linke closed the public hearing and reopened the regular at 7:33 PM. meeting Mounds View City Council Regular Meeting June 13,o 1988 --_--__ Page Four )Helen Bouley, 2249 County Road H21 stated she ` problem with the mound of sand at the has a 11. Resident across from her, and would like to see c t gone. site t gone. Requests'WU Tim Nelson, of Everest Development, Comments from problem. He explained the agreementawithgthed for the the Floor for is that it must be gone by September, there - is a good chance it will be P ember, but there in connection with another gone by the end July, He added they have water trucks eat he site biddingct he is and they will be shooting the hill with calcium chloride to 'elp keep it from blowing. Mrs- Bouley stated sh,3 would like to be kept by Everest as to what is go:ing on• informedShe also reported there is a problem with children playing on the and someone could get hurt. mound, Bill Frits, 8072 Long Lake Road, asked h w the sand would be moved, and by what route. Mr. Nelson explained heavy earth moving equipment would be used, and they would travel along Highway 10 or 35W and not go through the residential area. There was discussion on the b st way to communicate with the er Hankner suggesting the vandali mlne withxsomethin of ere can be ob the time of they would e , Problems with area. Willing p do a mailing tohe homes inNelson the Mayor Linke closed the regular meeting and opened the 12. Public Hearing next public hearing at 7:45 pM. There were no comments conernin Renewal of On - There license for ntsDoncol � g the renewal of the Sale Intoxicat: Linke closed the public hearing Supper Club, so Mayor Liquor License meeting at 7:49 PM. g and reoponed the regular for r Club Super Club Mayor Linke closed the regular meeting and opened the next public hearing at 7:45 PM. 13. Public Hearing There were no comments concerning the renewal of the Sale Renewal of On - liquor license °or Mermaid, inc.Mayor catinantoxi- meetingclosed tat he ��451PMhearing and reopenedtheregular LicenseLforur ` Mermaid, Inc. Mounds View City Council Regular Meeting June 13, 1988 sb ----------------- --- ---------- Page Five Mayor Linke closed the regular meeting and opened the next public hearing 7:45 _______ __ - 19. Public Hearing' at PM. There were no comments concerning the renewal of the liquor license Renewal,of On-. Sale Intoxi- for Loose Ends on 10, so Mayor Linke closed the public hearing and cating Liquor` License for reopened the regular meeting at 7:46 PM. Loose Ends on s 10 Clerk/Administrator. Pauley read the items on the proposed consent agenda, adding a I5. Approval of `- gas station license for P.CA Management Services, under Item T. Consent Agenda ge Attorney Meyers advised Item J, approving a salary increase for Shari Linke,should I be removed from the agenda for separate action. Motion/Second: Haukner/Quick to approval the consent agenda, minus Item J, and waive the reading of the resolutions. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Motion/Second: Quick/Wuori to approve a salary increase or Par s, Recreation and Forestry bssistant Shari Linke from $22,440 to $26,084 per year, retroactive to �J January 1: 1989. 4 ayes 0 nays 1 abstension Moti•_.1 Carried his wife. Mayor Linke abstained from the vote as Shari Linke is Savri Ayaz asked why an 18 percent salary increase was being given. Clerk/Administrator Pauley explained the job was new, and had not been rated before, and this increase would bring it up to where it should be. Mayor Linke closed the regular meeting and opened the 16. Public Hearing next public hearing at 7:51 PM. Renewal of off There were no comments concernir off -sale intoxicating liquor Bewal ins Liquor R the Sale Intoxicate for at Liquor, so Mayor Linke closed the. oablic hearing and License for reopened the regular meeting at 7:57 PM. B and R Liquor Mayor Linke closed the regular meeting and opened the 17. Public Hearing: next public hearing at 7:58 PM. Renewal of off - here were no comments concerning the renewal of the Sale I off -sale intoxicating liquor. license for Budget Liquor, Ling Liquor a- quor so Mayor Linke closed the public hearing and reopened License for the regular meeting at 7:58 PM, Budget Liquor Mounds View City Council June 13, 1988 Regular Meeting Page Six ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Clerk/Administrator Pauley reviewed proposed Resolu- 17. Adoption tion No. 2338, which addresses standby duty compensa- Resolution tion for the public works department. No. 2338 Motion/Second: Quick/Blanchard to approve Resolution No. 2338, amending Resolution No. 230.1, approving the supplementary agreement between the City of Mounds View and I.U.O.E. Local No. 49 for the period of January 1, 1988 through December 31, 1988, and waive the reading. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried' Mayor Linke closed the regular meeting and opened the 18. Public Hearing: last public hearing at 8:00 PM. Renewal of On -Sale Wine There were no comments concerning the renewal of the License for on -sale wine license for Bel -Rae Ballroom, so Mayor Bel -Rae Ball- Linke closed the public hearing and reopened the room regular meeting at 8:00 PM. Clerk/Administrator Pauley reviewed the proposed 19. Approval of construction manacement agreement with Everest Con- Construction struction Cr-pany. He explained the agreement had Managemen+j been reviewed and approved by both legal counsels. Agreement._!th He explained Staff would recommend approval of the Everest Con-_ agreement, which would allow Everest to draw coney struction through tax increment financing, to a maximum of Company $72,000. Motion/Second: Quick/Wuori to approve the construction management agreement with Everest Construction Company. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried" Clerk/Administrator Pauley explainer: the proposed 20. First Reading ordinance is in response to the direction of the 1987 of Ordinance Legislatu;:e. He added the ordinance uas been revised No. 434 ,;ver what was first proposed, and it has the whole- hearted endorsement of the Police Chief and himself. Motion/Second: Hankner/Quick to approve the first reading of Ordinance No. 434, amending the Municipal Code of Mounds View by amending Chap�ar 1.11 ei.titl.ed "General Provisions of Code", and waive the reading. 5 aves 0 na_s Motion Carried. Mounds View City Council June 13, 1988 Regular Meeting Page Seven Motion Second: Hankner/Quick to approve Resolution 21. Consideration No. , approving a conditional use permit for of Resolution. Church Upon the Rock, 7901 Red Oak Drive, contin- No. 2341 gent upon satisfactory negotiations occurring between the current property owner at 1959 Red Oak Drive -and the Church, and waive the reading. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Councilmember Hankner explained this resolution 22, Consideration' establishing an environmental task force was not cut of Resolution in stone, and it is a group that will be evolving No. 2339 over time. There was discussion on having 9 members, and the flexibility it could allow. Councilmember Hankner stated she would like some time to work with this before putting it into an ordinance, and she would hope the Council •mould begin making appointments at the next regular meeting. She added the information could be cable -cast, put in the area newspapers, spread by word of mouth, and so forth. Clerk/Administrator Pauley stated it was the hope o° the Council to get members for the task force from ((�� all around the City. C. Motion/Second: Hankner/Quick to adopt Resolution No. 2339, establishing an environmental quality task force, and waive the reading of the resolution. 5 ayes 0 nays Public Works Director Minetor reviewed his memo of June 8 regarding emergency work to be done on Well No. 2. Motion/Second: Quick/Hankner to approve a contract with Layne Minnesota Company for emergency repair work on Well No. 2 in the amount of $3,328, to be charged to the water fund. 5 ayes 0 nays Clerk/Administrator Pauley advised that Staff would recommend approval of the preliminary plat for the major subdivision of Mounds View Business Park 2nd Addition. 0 Motion Carried 23. Approval of Contract with Layne Minnesot Motion Carried 24. Consideration of Resolution No. 2342 Mounds View City Council June 13, 1988 Regular Meeting Page Eight l Motion/Second: Hankner/Blanchard to app,ave Resolution l JNo. TSU—approving the preliminary plat for a major subdivision, Mounds View Business Park 2nd Addition, Everest Development, Ltd., and waive the reading. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Attorney Meyers updated the Council on the progress 25. Report of of the pipeline case. He advised it could be 90 to Attorney 120 days before any action occurs in court. Councilmember Wuori had no report. 26. Reports of Councilmember. Wuori Councilmember Quick asked that the Council consider Councilmember proclaiming a week in which to commend the Pinewood Quick Park volunteers, as they had not been thanked publicly yet by the Council Motion/Second: Quick/Linke to direct Staff to write a proclamation designating the week of June 19-25 as Pinewood Playground Volunteer Week. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Councilmember Blanchard reminded everyone that June 21 Councilmember isthe first recycling day. She also reported the Blanchard 30th anniversary plans are coming along well, and a dance will be held at the Bel -Rae Ballroom on July 13, with the Dick Mackos group playing, and admission will be free to all people wearing an anniversary button. The Council and Staff will be waiters and wait.-^sses for the evening. Councilmember Hankner reported the Park and Rec Councilmember Commission is looking et Hillview Park again, to Hankner come up with a better layout. She also reported the Council will be taking action on Silver View Park Trail at the June 27 meeting. Clerk/Administrator Pauley advised that Amoco has submitted their park dedication fee of $17,000. Mayor Linke asked that a vacant house at 2309 or 2317 Mayor Links Hillview be looked at, as there are noxious weeds that should be removed. )Councilnember Hankner reported there is zlso a vacant home at 7889 Woodlawn which needs looking into. Mounds View City Council June 13, 1988 Regular Meeting Page Nine Clerk/Administrator Pauley explained Staff is aware of r the problem on Hillview and is working on it. Councilmember Quick stated they should look at the whole City, and ask the Police Department for their input on other areas to look at. Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported that, pursuant to 27. Report of Council direction, he has set up a joint meeting with Clerk/ the Council and School Board, for June 30, at 7:30 PM Administrator;; at City Hall. Motion/Second: Linke/Hankner to set a special meeting or June , 1988 at 7:30, to meet with the School a` Board. Motion Carried 5 ayes 0 nays Councilmember Hankner stated she would be contacting the mayors of the other cities to inv.:te them to join the meeting. Clerk/Administrator Pauley reviewed the need for renum— bering the residence at 7911 Spring Lake Road, due to a change in zip codes, and asked Council authorization , '1)of Ordinance No. 435. He added the home owner has signed a waiver of public hearing. Motion Second: Hankner/Blanchard to approve the first rea ing o Ordinance No. 435, and waive the readinc. 5 ayes 0 nays Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported the Legislators have been scheduled for the beginning of the June 27 Council meeting. Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported that if the work is okay, he would prepare a resolution for consideration at the June 27 meeting for the sanitary sewer main north of Woodcrest Park. Mayor Linke reported the Ramsey County League of Local Governments would be meeting on Wednesday, June 15, to discuss the new tax laws. City Planner Herman reported the Pianning'Commissior: will be holding a public meeting at 7:s0 PM on June 15 to discuss the latest Harstad proposal. She added that \fliers have been sent out. to)Mr. Frits asked if the City would take care of the change in address resulting from the new zip code designations for the utility billings. Motion Mounds View City Council ' Regular Meeting Clerk/Administrator Pauley replied they would, and the County would also program their computers with the change. Mr. Frits reported he had checked with the State. and technically, drivers licenses and all other licenses must also be changed as a result of the zip code change. Mayor Linke adjourned the meeting at 8:47 PM. I June 13, 1988 Page Tin r, 28. Adjournment UIVAPPROvi_. PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OA' MOUNDS VI E'.+ RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA Regular Meeting June 27. 1988 Mounds View City Hall 2401 Hwy. 10, Mounds View, MN 55112 ---------------------------------- The Mounds View City Council was called to order bl. Call to y Order Mayor Linke at 7:00 PM on Monday, June 27, 1988. 2. Pledge of The Pledge of Allegiance was said. Allegiance MEMBERS PRESENT: Councilmembers Wuori, Quick. Hankner 3. Roll Call And Mayo. It was noted Councilmember Blanchard was abbent. ALSO PRESENT: City Attorney Meyers, Clerk/Admini- sirator pauley and City Planner Herman. Gerry Nelson, project director with "Celebrate 90" 4. Presentation of "Celebratioi ®� gave a slide presentation and introduced the audience 70" Video 1 to the concept of "Celebrate 90"He asked for . Program by community support in this program, and advised a Gerry Nelson video would be available soon. Clerk/Administrator Pauley stated they would announce in advance when it would be shown on cable tv. Mayor Linke read the proclamation declaring June 19-2' as Pinewood Playground Volunteer Appreciation Week an, presented the proclamation to the representatives present. Mary Bradley thanked the Council and City and Sch')ol District for their very good support. After recessing, the Council reconvened at 7:31, at which time Public Works Director Minetor was present. Presentation Senator Novak reviewed tax changes which were occurinq 5. and entation due to recent legislative action and he stated the with Senator picture looks good for Mounds View, Discussion which should see a Novak and Rep" 40% increase in local government aid. resentatives Knuth and VOFS Mounds View City Council, g� Regular Meeting ----------- U Al_y GVED ---age-Twune o-1988 Representative Knuth updated the Council on the laud transfer d H and Highway 10,11which dwill eallow crealig realignment ofe at County aOld Highway 8 for smoother flow in. traffic and to assist with conjestion in that area. He also updated the Council on pipeline legislation, as well as reporting there is no further study or action planned for the airport. Representative Voss reported he had been closely involved with the tax bill, and not only will Citv government do well, but the residents will also, _ with nearly $1.3 million in credit RP -proved for the next biennium. He also reperted he has not received a noise complaint for the airport in the past year, as a result of the successful movement of the runways one-half mile further from the City, and with the limitation of the airport as a minor airport. He reported the Highway 10 relocation should be completed this fall, which should relieve congestion for residents in the area. Councilmember Hankner informed the Senator and Represen- tatives that the Council will be meeting with the school district superintendent and business manager the evening of June 30, to get a better understanding of their budgeting process. She invited them to join the meeting, and stated other Cities had been invited also. Mayor Linke and the Council thanked Senator Novak and Representatives Knuth and Voss for their time with the Council. Motion/Second: Hankner/Quick to approve the May 23, 1988 minutes as amended. 6. Approval of Minutes: 4 ayes 0 nays May 23, 1988 & June 13, 1988 Motion Carried Motion/Second: Wuori/Hankner to approve the June 13, 1988 minutes as presented. 4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Mayor Linke closed the regular meeting and opened the 7. Public Hearing: first public hearing at 7:50 PM. Ordinance No. City Planner Herman explained the purpose of proposed 442 Ordinance No. 442, which combines garages and accessory buildings under permitted uses, and the rational for combining them. There were no comments or questions from the audience. so Mayor Linke closed the public hearing and reopened the regular meeting at 7:54 PM. Aff- ��jjj/ June 27, 1988 Mounds View City CouncilU N RO M- page ThreeRegular Meeting ]� �,j/---•--------------------------------------S. Puulic Hearin Mayor Linke closed the regular meeting and opened the Ordinance next public hearing at 7:54 PM. No. 443 City Planner Herman explained the purpose of proposed ordinance No. 443. There were no comments or questions from the audience, so Mayor Linke closed the public hearing and reopened the regular meeting at 7:56 PM. Mayor Linke closed the regular meeting and opened the 9• next public hearing at 7:56 PM. Park and Rec Director Saarion explained the City had had the opportunity to place street sweepings at Greenfield Park earlier in the spring, but it was determined that was a wetland area. She has since talked to Tom Peterson, with Ramsey Ccunty, who visited the site and has given the analysis that it is not a wetland and it would be okay for the sweepings to be placed there. She showed on an overhead map of the area where they would like to place the sweepings. Park and Rec Director Saarion requested Council authorization to amend the wetland map as proposed and allow a wetland alteration permit for the fill. City Planner He explained the permit is necessary as a portion of the buffer area would be receiving sweepings. Savri Ayaz, 7751 Bona Road, asked what type of permit would be required, as he was afraid of the City setting a precedent. City Planner Herman explained a wetland alteration permit would be required. Clerk/Administrator Pauley clarified that no structure would be placed in the area, that it would be filled, leveled and sodded, with picnic tables, horseshoe Pits and such established. Councilmember Hankner asked if the City had given itself a wetland alteration permit before. Clerk/Administrator Pauley replied they hadn't, but they have given them to residents. Mayor Linke closed the public hearing and reopened the regular meeting at 8:02 PM. u Public Hearing: Consideration of Wetland Alteration Permit and ordinance No.. 444 for Greenfield Park Mounds View City Council 1988Regu_ar Meeting UNAPPROVEDPage Four Mayor Linke closed the regular meeting and opened 10. Public Hears the last public hearing at 6:02 PM• Considerai_„ Public Works Director Minetor P resented an overhead of Wetland Alteration map of the area, showing where the work was to be Permit for done. He explained the rear of 7807 Bona Road has Wetland No. an outlet to the wetland due to erosion and settle- ment in the area, t;iey are.requesting a wetland Lake P(Sil alteration permit to do minor repair work that would Sewer) take care of the erosion orobler,:. 1. Clerk/Administrator Pauley explained rip -rap was not placed is the outlet and if '.c is not done now, it will no longer function. Mr. Ayaz stated the words alteration permit bother him, but he realizes the importance of the work to be done. Mayor Linke closed the public hearing and reopened the regular meeting at 8:07 PM. Public Works Director Minetor reported he had interviewed four people that day for an intern- ship position to do the pavement management program and he requested Council authorization to hire Troy Gambel. Motion/Second: Hankner/Quick to approve the hiring of Troy Gambel on a temporary basis, at a rate of $7.50 per hour, for twelve weeks, beginning June 27, 1988. 4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Public Works Director Minetor left the meeting at this time. Clerk/Administrator Pauley read the items on the 11. Approval of proposed consent agenda. Consent Agenda Councilmember Hankner asked that Item C be removed for discussion. Motion/Second: Hankner/Wuori to approve the consent agenda, minus Item C, and waive the reading of the resolutions. 4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Councilmember Hankner asked Park and Re,: Director Saarion to explain LAWCON grant application for thrae present from that area. Mounds View City Council -- Regular Meeting- UNAPPRO!�� p4e Five198B --------- ------------------- Park and RF• ---- ® 4rant is, and thatttheSCition explained what a ►•4 hiking trail to loo Y is asking for a biki gCO or explained where thep around at Silver View Park, She it would be an 8, funding would come from, and that compatible bituminous pathway, which would be for both walking and biking. MotionTy--s d: Quick/Wuori to approve Resolution NO �upportin funding for further developmentrant �ofaSion for LA Park as Outlined in the Mae LAWCar 4 ayes ter Plan' and waive the reading. Y 0 nays Motion Carri:N Clerk/Administratcr Pauley explained the necessity Of proposed Ordinance No. 435, relative to the change Of zip code within the City• 12 2nd Reading '- Motion/Second and Adoptiod`:: —��• Quick/Hankner to have the second of Ordinance reading and adoption of Ordinance No. 435 NO. 435 Chapter 47 entitled "House and Building ' amending waive the reading, g Numbers", and Councilmember Wuori - a_ve Councilmember Quick - ave Councilmember Hankner - aye Mayor Links - aye Clerk/Administrator Paulo Motion Carried Proposed Ordinance Y explained the intent °f N°• 934, 13. 2nd Reading ' Motion/Second: Hankner and Adoption reading an adoption of/Ordinanceappro43 the second of Ordinance Chapter 1.11 entitled "General NO' 439, amendingNo, 434 Code" Provisions of the and waive the reading, Councilmember Wuori - aye Councilmember Quick - aye Councilmember Hankner - aye Mayor Links - aye Ma Or Motion Carried Y Links reports 2ublic heLrings had been held two weeks ago for e.L the liquor licenses, and Council did not ge` any negative commentsthe. 14. Approval of Issuance of Motion/Second: Quick/Hankner to a Liquor License of liquor J-enses for Roberts offp10°ve the issLance icating, Donatelle's Supper Club - On -Sale Mermaid Cocktail Loun e - On -Sale Intoxicating, Ends on 10 - On -Sale g - On -Sale Intoxicatir; Off-SaleIntoxicating Intoxicating, B and g' Loose Intoxicating, and t el-' Budget Liquor _ R Liquor - 4. and Bel -Rae Ballr_ Off -Sale °q - On -Sale Wine, 9 ayes 0 nays Motion Carrie( founds View City Council June 27, 1988 A__IVE `"'�� Page Six Regular Meeting 1i - ------------------------------ -- Park and Rec Director Saarion reviewed the h'story 15. ConsideraWn of the proposed completion of the pathway at Silver of Propos® to View Park, and the meetings that have been held and Complete Staff's recommendation that the work be done this Silver View coming fall. Park Pathway Councilmember Hankner reported Staff had met with a group of residents or May:27 to discuss the exten- sion of the pathway, and based on that discussion, she was ready to make a motion to direct Staff to proceed with the work. Mayor Linke stated he was concerned at this time with the cost and replacement factors of using ag lime, as was being recommended, over wood chips, and he would prefer to stay with wood chips. Councilmember Hankner replied the majority of the residents are concerned with the use of wood chips, as they blow and make more of a mesa, whereas ag lime would offer the asthetic value the residents would like to have. She also stated they must consider the water flow in the area, and she feels this would be a good ccmpro- mise for all involved. There was discussion on the merits of ag lime versus wood chips and where it fits into the project. o Councilmember Wuori expressed concern with ag lime washing into the lake and possible contamination pro- blems. She also expressed concern with the park getting hodge-podge for the trail system. Dave Radamacher, 7421 Parkview Drive, stated the Park Hoard would be rdeeting next week to discuss the lake, and he would rather see ag lime used as it is less threatening than wood chips, and he suggested considering ag lime for the remainder of the park. Motion/Second: Hankner/Linke to direct Staff to begin The implementation of the continuation of the development of the path around Silver View Pond, according to the planning discussion with the residents and Staff on May 271 1988. Staff is further directed to distribute detailed plans to the residents and City Council prior to actual work being done. Staff is further directed to review and report on the environmental effects of dg lime. 9 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried: Councilmember Hankner asked if any resporze was ever received from Scotland Green concerning the continuation of the pathway through their property. Mounds View City Council a �y Regular Meeting Tune 27, 1988______-�+^___Page-Seven___ Park and Rec Director Saarion replied they are meeting next week to discuss it. Councilmember Hankner stilted it is important the s:quencirg of this project be done properly, such as plantings after the grading, and so forth. Carol Golden. of Parkview Drive, stated she was upset witn the way the City has not maintained the property there, as the residents take pride in what they have and she would like the City to take pride also. Councilmember Hankner replied they are looking at the possible addition of a staff person in the Public Works department, for maintenance duties. Clerk/Administrator Ppuley explained the pr:;osed ordinance 16. First Rearlin was in conjunction with the ublic hearin P g held earlier in the J'.` of Ordinance evening. No. 942 ' Motion_ /Second: Quick/Hankner to approve the first - reading of Ordinance No. 442 amending the Municipal Code of MoundsView by amending Chapter 40 entitled - "Zoning", and waive the reading. 9 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried? Motion/Second: Quick/Hankner to approve the first readingof Ordinance 17. First Reading--; , No. 443 amending the Municipal Code of Mounds View by amending Chapter 90 entitled ` of Ordinance. _r "Zoning", and waive the reading. No. 943 4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried City Planner Herman reported the City had reviewed the preliminary plat two weeks 18. Consideration' ago, and Staff would recommend approval of the final plat at this time. of Resolution No. 2347 Motion/Second: QuicW Wuori to adopt Resolution No. 234ap approving the final plat for a major subdivision, MOunds View Business Park 2nd Addition, Everest Development, Ltd., and waive the reading. 4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried. City Planner Herman explained the purpose of proposed Resolution No. 2333. 19. Consideration of Resolution' L' No. 2333 RMounds egular VMiew eetingCity Council UNAPPROVED page Eight988 ---------------------------------------------LLL��--V--LLL--------------------- City Planner Hermon reviewed the request of the 20. Considera�Aon applicant to operate a billiard hall Within a B-2 of Resolut m district. She stated the Planning Commission had No. 2346 discussed the request and -hile they are in favor of having such a business within the City, they do not feel it is proper within a B-2 district and have recommended denial. Motion/Second: (• '.ck/Hankner to approve Resolutior No. 2I46_,__Jenying the request of James Toner to operate a billiard hall at Silver View Plaza, Mounds View Planning Case -No. 240-88, and waive the reading. 4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Clerk/Administrator Pauley reviewed proposed Resolu- 21. Consideration tion No. 2344. of Resolution No. 2344 Motion/Second: Hankner/Quick to approve Resolution No. C,a sexual harassment policy for the City, and waive the reading. 4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Clerk/Administrator Pauley explained the purpose for 22. Considerat,n ,. the requFsted wetland alteration permit. of Resolut.�jn No. 2345 Motion/Second: Wuori/Hankner to approve Resolution No. 2345, approving a wetland alteration permit for Greenfield Park, and waive the reading. 4 ayes 0 ,._a Motion Carried Motion/Second: Quick/Hankner to approve Resolution 23. Consideration No. 2349, approving a wetland alteration permit for of Resolution storm sewer outlet repair, and waive the reading. No. 2349 4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Motion/Second: Quick/Wuori to approve Resolution 24. Consideration No. a wetland alteration permit for of Resolution replacewent of the sanitary sewer across Wetland No. No. 2350 1-17 between Silvei Lake Road and Long View Drive, and waive the reading. 4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried U Mounds View City Council p'y aJune 27 1988 Reguian MeetingUh App � d, n - Page Nine City Attorney Meyers had no report. 25. Report of Attorney Councilmember Wuori reported the Mounds View Community 26. Reports of Theater is in rehersai for the !mmer production of Councilmembers "Westside Story", which will he -n:esented the end of. Councilmember July. Tickets will be going on sale July 10. Wuori Councilmember Quick had no report. Councilmember'' Quick Councilmember Hankner reported a number of people hLve Councilmember expressed interested in serving on the Environmental Hankner Quality Task Force, and she would like to make those appointments at this time, to get it started, and fill the remainer of the vacancies as additional interest is shown. Mayor Links stated the policy has been that a standard application is turned in before any appointment. Councilmember Hankner replied that was for commissions, and this is an advisory task force to the Council, as per the resolution adopted two weeks ago. Motion/Second: Hankner/Quick to appoint the following people to the Environmental Quality Task Force: Dave Radamacher, to 12/31/89, gob Carpenter, to 12/31/90, Paul Milks, to 12/31,/89, Kay-Weseman, to 12/31/90, Barb Watkins, to 12/31/90, and Steve Lauderbauch to 12/31/89. 4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Clerk/Administrator Pauley stated that Public Works Director Minster would be calling the first meeting, at which time a chair would be elected. Councilmember Hankner stated she hoped they would have additional names in the next few .reeks, to fill the remaining seats. She also expressed satisfaction in having a good mix on the task force of residents from different areas of the City. Councilmember Hankner reported the Council had discussed the east access from Highway 610 and County Road J, and had asked Staff to search for all previous resolution which had been adopted concerning the matter, and after reviewing them, she would like to further state the City's position. Clerk/Administrator Pauley advised that a resolution would supercede any previous resolutions. Mounds View CityCouncil U E IVA P P R��W� �-,--- June 27, 1988 Page Ten----- Regular Meeting ---------------------------- After considerable discussion, it was agreed to have Staff write the appropriate resolution. P Motion/Second: Hankner/Quick to adopt Resolution No. as outlined by Councilmember Hankne.', and , direct Staff to write it. 0 Motion Carried 4 ayes nays Councilmember Hankner asked if anything could be done about the dying trees at Silver View Park. Clerk/Administrator Pauley replied that while they have tried to stay on top of it, they cannot stop it. Councilmember Hankner reported there is a problem with people speeding around on the new pavement in the park. Clerk/Administrator Pauley advised the Police should be called when a problem is nbserved. Mayor Linke reported the festivities for the 30th Motion Carried anniversary party would begin on July 13, with a dance on the 13th, a gathering at City Hall on the 16th for all former and present Staff, City Council and Commission members, and the Festival in the Park on the C, 17th. Clerk/Administrator Pauley reported he has asked Park 27. Report of and Rec Director Saarion to discuss the advisability Clerk/ of fireworks with the Fire Chief, due to the extremely Administrator dry conditions. He stated that if the Fire Chief feels it is appropriate, he would recommend cancellation of them. Clerk/Administrator Pauley reviewed his memo of June 24 to the Council, requesting authorization to purchase a computer for his office. Motion Second: Hankner/Quick to authorize the purchase of the equipment listed, with $2,225 to come from the Training/Conferences Account 100-4190-362, and the of $1,050 to come from the City Hall Capital Improve-M.— Account 100-4190-703. 4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried idayor Linke apologized that the time for residents 28. Residents requests and comments from the floor had been left off Requests and the agenca and asked if there were any at this time. Comments from There were not. `ad Mounds;View City Council Regular Meeting Mayor Linke adjourned the meeting at 9:41 x_x. Respectfully submitted, Donald F. Pauley Clerk/Administrator M June 27, 1988 Page Eleven a 29. Adjournment jt, , S MEMO TO: Clerk -Administrator anal City Council FROM: City Planner Herman fs� DATE: June 30, 1988 SUBJECT: HARSTAD DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAI. - GREENFIELD ESTATES Enclosed are the unapproved minutes from the Planning Commission meeting of June 22, 1988. Also enclosed are the notes from the public meeting held by the Planning Commission at its June 15 meeting. I would like to review Planning Commission Resolution No. 229-88 giving recommendations tj the City Council regarding the Harstad proposal. You have by way of the Planning Commission or through your own packets received all information about the Greenfield Estates. <+? KH/BAC MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMNISSI•.I RESOLUTION NO. 229-38 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION OF RECOMMENDATION TO TH5 CITY COUNCIL REGARDING THE HARSTAD DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL KNOWN AS GREENFIELD ESTATES WHEREAS, Harstad Companies has requested approval of a single family development proposal known as Greenfield Estate si and WHEREAS, Harstad Companies has requested the following in # order to construct their proposed development: 1. Major subdivision (17 single family homes) 2. Wetland zoning district map amendment 3. Wetland alteration permit 4. Variance from a) 100 foot wetland setback requirement, b) 125 foot minimum lot width, and c) 20,000 squa-e foot minimum lot size 5. Vacation of right-of-way (ROW) 6. Park lard dedication credit 7. Conditional use permit for working in the flood plain; and i WHEREAS, the Army Corps of Engineers, Ramsey Soil and Water Conservation District, and the City's Engineering Consultant have reviewed the wetland boundaries and found some discrepancy in the boundaries shown on the City's official Wetland Zoning flap; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommends approving the - Wetland Zoning District amendment to accurately reflect the existing boundaries of Wetland No. 1-19; and WHEREAS, the developer must meet the conditions outlined in Chapter 48.06, Subd. 1, 2 and 3 in order to obtain a wetland alteration permit; and WHEREAS, the City's engineering consultant has reviewed the development proposal and found that the discharge rate from the wetland will noL increase; and WHEREAS, the City's engineering consultant has reviewed the development proposal and found that the storm water storage volume of the wetland will increase; and WHEREAS, the City's engineering consultant has reviewed the development proposal and found that the flood height of the `y wetland will not increase; and MOUNDS V:.EW PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 229-88 PAGE TWO WHEREAS, the discharge rate, storm water storage volume, and the wetland's flood height will not have a substantial nor significant adverse impact upon the wetland; and WHEREAS, the City's engineering consultant has reviewed the phosphorus calculations for the development per City Code Chapter 48.06, Subd. 3(A)2, and found it to not be in conformance with the Code requirements; and WHEREAS, the developer has suggested an alternative method for calculating the phosphorus stripping; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission would recommend evaluating the phosphorus stripping capabilities of a wetland for both the critical storm event and the average storm event; and WHEREAS, the City's the alternative phosphorengineering us strrippingmodelsandafoundnt sitetoebed acceptable in calculating an average storm event with some changes in the input assumptions; and WHEREAS, City Councilthh to the atthe l"Walker anning CMethod' osuggested n would ebymthe ddeveloper is an acceptable method of calculating the phosphorus stripping capacity of a wetla.d for an average storm occurrence with some changes in the input assumptions; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission would further recommend that if this methodology were chosen to supersede the ordinance requir-vent using the Ramsey Soil and Water Conservation District formula, the model should be modified or another found to assess the phosphorus stripping for a critical storm, therefore, ensuring that the analysis would produce the most cc,nservative estimate; and WHEREAS, the two analyaes gathered, phosphorus stripping in a wetland for an average storm event and critical storm event, should be reviewed to assess the overall quantifiable affect of the proposed development against the existing wetland; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommends to the City Council to review the standard set in 48.06 (3)(A) for phosphorus stripping and recommends hat the standard should be that for a fully developed watershed the wetland alteration shall not result in a net decrease in phosphorus stripping capacity as compared to the predevelopment conditions of the wetland; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission further recommends that the City Council add to 48.06, Subd. 4, the term "phosphorus stripping" to allow the City Council to place conditions related to that subject upon an alteration permit approval; and `� MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING CONHiSSION RESOLUTION NO. 229-88 PAGE THREE l_I WHEREAS, Chapter 48.06, Subd. 4(3) requires that following information as part of the wetland alteration permitting process; 1. The tuna period for commencement and nompletion of the deve :pmcnt including time for staging of development, if applicable. 2. Design specification and plan for all sediment and erosion control measures as well as all grading and drainage appertenances and practices; and WHEREAS, the developer has not provided the required information such as the location of the temporary road nor the time period for the commencement of the development including time periods for staging; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission would recommend denial of the watland alteration permit based on the insuffi.:ient information on the revised phosphorus calculations and on the construction timing and temporary haul road; and WHEREAS, the developer has requested a variance from the minimum lot size-20,000 square feet and minimum lot width-125 feet as measured at the building setback line and the 100 foot �. setback; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission and Staff have reviewed this request and found that there are no exceptional or extraordinary circumstances which apply to the properties which do not apply generally to other propertios in the same zone or vicinity and result from lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances over which the owners of the property, since enactment of this Code, have had no control; and WHEREAS, furthermore, the Planning Commission and Staff has found that the request is net the minimum variance which would alleviate the hardship; economic conditions alone shall not be considered a hardship; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission would recommend denial of the variance requests for lot size, lot width and the 100 foot setback; and WHEREAS, the developer has requested a conditional use permit for working in a flood plain; and WHEREAS, the City's engineering consultant has reviewed the development proposal and found nc% adverse affect upon the flood plain; and HOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 229-88 PAGE FOUR WHEREAS, the Planning Commission would recommend approving a conditional use permit for filling in a flood plain contingent upon the receipt and review of the information regarding the temporary haul road; and WHEREAS, the developer has requested vacation of right-of-way and a park dedication fund credit and the Planning Commission has no recommendation; and WHEREAS, it is the practice of `ye Planning Commission to recommend approval of a development in total. NOW, THEREFORE, BE 1T RESOLVED the Planning Commission recommends denial of the development proposal Known as Greenfield Estates, except for Lot 4, Block 4, which is not within the wetland zoning district and meets the Code requitaments of Chapter 40: for the following reasons: 1. Denial of the wetland alteration permit 2. Denial of the variance for lot size 3. Denial of the variance for lot width 4. Denial of the variance for 100 foot setback BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission recommends approving the wetland zoning district amendment separate from this development proposal so as to have the City's records accurately refle,t the existing wetland. BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that the Planning Commission directs Staff to forward this resolution to the City Council prior to approval of the minutes. ATTEST: (SEAL) Adopted this day of , 1988. Chairman City Planner W C) PROCEEDINGS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW !1 RAMSEY COU'"-" 1, MINNESOTA Special Meeting June 22, 1988 Mounds View City Hall 2401 Hwy. 10, Mounds ------------------------------------------------------------------------ View, MN 55112 The Mounds View Planning Commission was called 1. Call to to order by Chairman Mountin at 7:31 PM on Wednesday, Order Jut , 22, 1988. MEMBERS PRESENT: Commissioners Burgers, Saunders, 2. Roll Call Zollner, Miller and Chairman Mountin. It was noted that Commissioners Peters and Simons 1-' had excused absences. ALSO PRESENT: City Planner Herman and Councilmember '? Wuori. Motion/Second: Burgers/Zollner to approve the May 4, 3. Approval of 1988 regular meeting minutes and the May 18, 1988 Minutes: ` special meeting minutes as presented. May 4, 1988 an$__< May 18, 1988 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried There were no residents requests or comments from 4. Residents the floor. Requests and Comments from -_ the Floor Peter Sabee, of Barr Engineering, reviewed their 5. Consideration correspondence of June 17 to the City Council and of Resolution Planning Commission, clarifying issues previously No. 229-88 brounht up in the discussion of the proposed Green- Regarding field Estates development. Greenfield Estates Preli- Mr. Sabee reported that in addrRssir. .:,e May 31, minary Plat 1988 letter from the developer regarairg requirs:rien=s for lot size, lot width, setbacks and so forth for developments within the wetland zone, they reviewed three different ordinances, from the City of Chanhassen, the State Shoreland and Floodplain Management Regula- tions and Nine Mile Bluff Creek Regulations, and found them to be similarly restrictive with those of Mounds View, and he reviewed the various requirements. Mounee View Planning Commission Juna 22, 1988 Special Meeting Page Two ---------------------------------------------------------------------- John Borovsky, of Barr Engineering, explained that they had respc.,ded as they thought appropriate to the developer's letter, but he realistically feels that passing judgment on this issue should be with the Planning Commission, City Council and legal counsel, as it relates not so much to technical issues as it does to community standards. Mr. Sabee reviewed the letter regarding the pl.jsphorus stripping capacity, which interprets the intent of the ordinance to protect the potential of the wetland function, and he reviewed Chet intetpretat!on. He explained there are no wetlands that can completely strip phosphorus from the water, and due to the time storm water spends in a typical wetland, there is not enough time to remove the phosphorus. He added they must also consider the intent of ti,e or-.inance, that development should have no impact on the wetland phosphorus stripping capacity as compared to the existing conditions of the wetland. Mr. Sabee recommended the Planning Commission consider a change in the standard that would result in a s`andar4 that states that whatever development or alteration there is, it could not result in a decrease in the phosphorus stripping capacity, that it can only be maintained or improved. Mr. Sabee stated that in addressing the Planning Commission's concern about an average storm versus a critical storm, the Walker Method is an alternative that could be used for an average event, and he would recommend some modification of the Walker Method or another method be considered for critical storm events. He added that they have looked at this issue from a technical viewpoint and did not look at it as an issue of setting precedence. Mr. Borovsky added that with a particular development, when phosphorus stripping is a big hurdle, they should look at other methods for analyzing phosphorus stripping. Mr. Sabee cautioned that their letter dealt solely with considering the method and the attributes of such, and does nLt apply to how the method is applied to this development. Jim Merila, of Merila & Associates, questioned whether the representatives of Barr Engineering felt the developer's proposal. strips phosphorus better than the existing wetland using the Walker Oodel. +� Mr. Sabee replied using a different model than that required by the Code was dependent upon approval of the Planning Commission and Council, and they do not Mounds View Planning Commission June 22, 1988 Special Meeting Page Three ----------------------------------------------------- ------ ------ ---- �-1 have an option to use that as a measure for a proposed development. He added that the questions of how it would calculate to a critical storm event needs to be evaluated. He also stated the Planning Commission needs to address what method would be used and how the standard would be applied. Mr. Merile: stated the existing method does not provide an adequate manner of calculating phosphorus stripping, and a better method is needed. Kay Weseman, no address given, asked if there was another approach to improving phosphorus stripping in a wetland. Mr. Borovsky stated he would be surprised if state of the art phosphorus calculations didn't show the proposed development would result in improved phosphorus stripping capacity. He added that while that gives an indication of the direction the development would prorsed, it does not provide a test of whether it would be good enou,h or not. He stated the language in the ordinance now is what the test would be. City Planner Herman stated they are trying to help the City Council decide what direction they want to go, and the issue is both how to get the end result, what model to use as well as the end result itself. Mr. Sabee expressed concern with the total picture and its implications, stating they need a standard that will look at all cases and protect the intent of the ordinance in all cases without necessarily approving the development. Mr. Merila stated he feels there is a better technical method of calculating phosphorus than what is currently being judged, and if Barr has another method, they have no problem complying with that versus the Walker Method. Mr. Meril.a reviewed his letter of June 22, in response to the June 17 letter from Barr Engineering. City Planner Herman reviewed proposed Resolution No. 229-E8 with the Planning Commission. She stated that regardless of whether the development is approved, she would recommend the Coucnil address the proposed change to the wetland boundaries and bring the wetland map current. There was discussion among the Commissioners regarding setting standards. City Planner Herman read from portions of the ordinance and questioned whether the Planning Commission was already setting standards, and she advised recommending to the Council that they look at the standard rather than giving a definitive recommendation. Mounds View Planning Commission Special Meeting ------------- --------------------- Mr, Borovsky suggested an addition to the proposed resolution stating that with a wetland, there aCUYd be no net decrease in phosphorus stripping cap Y. for a fully dmentoconditionsed watershed in the wetland, andthey to predevelop in capacity should not reA.uce the tions fromsthe rwatershed of the existing condi phosphorus loading. ity Chairman Mountin recommended they advise the Cneeds tbe don orm toestablish flow rat uestand an dataibaseforthis and s future developments. to Councn a priority/belgiventtorest blishingt e flow rates on a city-wide basis what affect wetlands, in order to establish can be madedata base on which future June 22, 1988 Page Four ---- 5 ayes 0 nays Chairman Mountin noted the information Orequeste4(3) of the developer regarding Chapter 48..was received earlier in the day and there was not sufficient time to consider it before the meeting. She added that due to time constraints, Y table action on this request to wncw for further al information and must take action There was discussion on whether any additional lots would have been gained if the original upland had been used for four lots, and it was determined there would have been no gain. Mr. Merila stated it was more expesive to develop n with the setup of the proposed plat, than what they had originally requested. Chairman Mountin clarified that the City did not create a land -locked parcel for Mr. Harstad. The setback issue of 1agreedfor ithshouldbuffer bewas discusseddiscussed, and the CommissionePianner Herman reporLed that Barr lot by lot. City feel that by moving fill had done some work and they r requirement could be met. around, the 1001 buffe Mr. Sabee explained it would i..dolvc rediq�-ribution of where the fill is placed and the wetland created. He added there are many different ccnfigurr.ot re, may require giving up a lot, but would rot require other variances, although it would still require an alteration permit- (n Motion Carried 0 Mounds view Planning Commission Special Meeting ----------------------- Mr. Borovsky clarified that Barr Engineering was not directed by the City Council or Planning Commission to figure out how to configure the development to meet the Code, and that should be done by the developer. Chairman Mountin reccmmended adding another whereas to the resolution, that the variance to the 100' set- back should not be viewed as a bla alteration. nket variance and may in fact be changed by a redesign of the wetland Savri Ayaz, no address given, stated he feels the variances should be specific, not general. Chairman Mountin explained this would be an open door so that if reasonable alternatives are available, they will be looked at, and she added there may be a reasonable alternative here. Mr. Merila stated he feels precedent was set aith Planning Commission Resolution No. 93-83, for Dynamic Designers, as a variance was granted due to a hardship with many similarities to their proposed development. He added Edgewood Square was approved with 90, lots, and they are considered to be part of the wetland area. Ile added the big issues are lot size and width, and he questioned if there was a real need for the standards set for development of the wetlands. Chairman Mountin replied the variance to build in the 100' buffer is a Toot point if the preliminary plat is not approved. She explained that without the variances for Dynamic Designers, which was one lot, it was just not buildable. She stated she was not certain what tha circumstances were for. the Eigen- heer property, but if an error was made, that does not mean it should be repeated. Chairman Mountin reiterated that due to time constraints, the Planning Commission must work with what is before them, and as there is no request from the developer to table this to allow time for the Planning Commission to review the information received earlier today, action must be taken now. Motion/Second: Zollner/Miller to adopt Resolution No. 229-88, a resolution of recommendation to the City Council regarding the Harstad Development Proposal. known as Greenfield Estates. 5 ayes 0 nays City Planner Herman reported the item would be on the July 5 agenda of the Council, at,d the applicant would be notified. June 22, 1968 Page Five Motion Carried Mounds View Planning Commission June 22, 1988 Six Special Meting ------------------------------------------------------------- Page City Planner Herman reported she had spoken to the 6. Considerat ResolutW City Engineer, who verified that a 16" variance is the driveway. of No. 227-88 needed for the northern 12' of Regarding Motion/Second: Miller/Saunders to adopt Resolution Variance Request by Tom Deuser, - No. 227-88, approving the variance regr.est by font 2097 Pinewood Deuser, 2097 Pinewood Drive, Planning Case No. Drive 242-88. Motion Carried 5 ayes 0 nays It was noted there was no one present to represent 7. Consideration of Resolution the applicant. No. 228-88 City Planner Herman reported the applicant had been Regarding Minor Subdivision in earlier in the day and paid the fees, but it was in the original Request by discovered she had made an error the figures submitted should be W.E. Rosenquist; submission and Lake Spring checked for accuracy. Lake Road Chairman Mourtir suggested approving the request being received contingent upon easements documents and verification of the calc'tations. There was a question of whether Mrs. Honen has power of attorney for the property owners, her it agreed the only time proof of parents, but was ownership is needed is at the time of recording. tion/Second: ::urgers/Miller to adopt Resolution No. 228-88, recommending approval of a minor subdi- Lake Road, Mounds View Planning vision at 8380 Spring Case No. 245-88. Motion Carried 5 ayes 0 nays City Planner Herman advised the Commissioners of 8. Report of upcoming items for their next meeting. In discussing Staff the schedule of the Planning Commission, Chairman Mountin advised a calendar must be set for 1988, if it was not already done. It was agreed to have the recently received subdivision request placed on the July 6 agenda, for discussion and possible action at that time. The Planning commission will get back into a mode of holding their regular meeting on the first Wednesdav of the month, with an agenda session tb-z third Wednesday of the month, which time they .11 call to order if necessary. The Commissioners asked that Staff look into the sale which is set up across from Pinewood School. June 22, 1988 ----Page Seven Mounds View Planning Commission --------- Special Meeting _-___--_ ------------------------------ 9. Chairman's The attendees at the June 15 agenda session were Report Commissioners Mille.., Zollner, Burgers and Chairman _ ® Mountin, and City Planner Herman and Councilmember Wuori. t'rat the minutes of the Chairman Mountin asked June 15 be attached to the minutes public meeting of of the June 22 meeting. 10. Adjournment Chairman Mountin adjourned the meeting at 10:15 PM. f. Respectfully submitted, + Kim Herman City Planner t PROCEEDINGS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION CJ'rY OF MOUNDS VIEW O ' RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA Public Meeting June 15, 1988 Mounds View City Hall 2403. Hwy. 10, Mounds ------------------------------------------------------------------------- View, Mel 55112 Chairman Mountin opened the meeting at 7:30 PM on 1. Pre58ntation Wednesday, June 15, 1988, explaining that it was not and Discussion: a regular or special meeting, but rather a public Greenfield meeting to gather information and hear those concerned Estates Pre - with the proposed development. She explained the liminary Plat Planning Commission would not be calling to order or taking any action this evening, and she outlined the guidelines to be followed, with dialogue to flow to and from the vlanning Commission, and questions posed to the Commission, who would then ask them of the developer, and so forth. The Commissioners present were Commissioners Miller, Zollner, Burgers and Chairman Mountin, with City Planner Herman representing Staff. City Planner Herman explained there would be a brief presen- 4 tation by Harstad Co., and then Barr Engineering, who was hired by the City and for by Harstad paid Co., would answer questions and respond to the comments made. Jim Merila, of Merila & Associates, Inc., introduced himself and Steve Thatcher, then made a presentation showing several different drawings of the proposal, including two colored renderings showing the original and the new plan, with the road no longer going all the way through. He explained it had been eliminated primarily to have the wetland contiguous on both sides of Edgewood. fi, added the revised plan has been approved by the Army Corps of Engineers, and it will be cor- prised cf 17 lots total. Mr. Merila showed where the c•:isting wetland and buffer are, per the City map, and the wetland district line as determined by the Corps of Engineers, which differs. Ile stated that regardless of whether this development is done, the City's wetland map needs to be updated to show the determination made by the Corps of Engineers. Mr. Merila stated they are proposing to fill 1.6 acres of wetland, and to compensate for that, they will excavate an equal area. He pointed out that presently the 100' buffer line goes through two fully developed lots, and the current zoning map shows five lots within the current buffer strip. Mr. Merila stated that with t,.e iiew deliniation, three ® additional lots will be buildable that currently are not without a variance. With some modification, they can get four additional lots outside the 100' buffer strip, which Mounds View Planning Commission June 15, 1988 Public Meeting Page Two --------------------------------------------------------- he feels would be acceptable with the Corps of Engineers. It would require excavation of -,,proximately 10' nea, _ne inlet to the wetland which would be moved to the south. Mr. Merila showed the plan that was originally proposed in 1981, which was for 24 lots. He explained the appli- cation was submitted three days before the moritorium was created, thus tabling the proposal. N.dgewood Square was being developed at that time and Mr. Harstad asked for access to the southern corner of his lots at that time, and when it was not given, four to five lots were cut off and land locked. Mr. Merila stated they are now looKing for an amendment to have the wetland boundaries modified to their correct location, then a wetland alteration permit for 1.6 acres, as well as a variance for buildLag within 100' setback, and a variance from the 20,000 square foot lot size require- ment and variance from the 125 foot lot width. Mr. hirila stated that in a survey they did of 45 metro communities, 80 percent do not have a wetland ordinance, and of those that do, only two besides Mounds View have a minimum lot size, both of which are 16,000 square feet. He added only Mounds V" ew has a minimum lot width in the . wetland are that is greater than the rest of the City, as well as greater setback requirements. He added the Corps of Engineers has jurisdiction over any development by less than 10 acres and he feels their interpretation would be merit for modification of the City's wetland ordinance. Mr. Merila explained the process they plan for phosphorus removal, with the use of sedimentation ponds. The method they suggest for analtztng phosphorus stripping is the method currently being used by the St. Paul Water Works. Planner Herman presented a list of the issues that have been raised, and called upon the representacives from Barr Engineez- Ing to give their responses. She added <;hey had read the memo sent tc •ne Planning Commission and fe.t comfortable with the technical assumptions made in it. John. Borovsky, of Barr Engineering, discussed the phosphorus removal options avatla'le and explained the difference between dry and wet wetisnds. He explained the developer could meet the requirements of the ordinanne by methods that could be contrary to the intent of the ordinance, the Planning Commis- sion and City Council. He stated he is concerned at this time with recommending the Wrlkar method due to possibly setting u precedent in the community. He added that the principles involved in the Walker method are consistent with what they believe the City should consider, and he explained the assump- tions involved. He advised the City Attorney address the issue of precedence that may be set, and if it could be worked out, this type of approach would be acceptable. Mounds view Planning Commission June 15, 1988 Public Meeting Page Three Peter Sabee, of Barr Engineering, stated that if the rN intent of the ordinance is to protect the wetland the - 'amount of stripping is not the key item to be concen- trated on, but rather the existing conditions versus proposed conditio:s. Mr. Borovsky advised there are two decisions to be made, one being the appropriateness of the procedure, and secondly; the parameters the Planning Commission or City Council determines would be apprc,)riate with the ordinance. City Planner Herman stated Barr is putting their report in writing and it will be given to the Plannirg Commission prior to their next regular meeting. She also clarified the issue of the temporary injunction Mr. Harstad had sought with the development of Edgewood.Square. Mr. Harstad's opinion was that he should not have to provide access to his lots, and it should be the City's role to do so, and because it was not done, he is now claiming a hard- ship. Jim Sandidge, 7817 Bona Read, questioned how much property Mr. Harstad had purchased originally, as he has developed several homes in the area already and it is possible that he could have land -locked himself. He added he felt it was important the City find out. Mr. Merila showed on one o= the maps where the land -locked lots are, and where Mr- Harstad has developed homes already. He also stated he has sent Clerk/Adainistrator Pauley a letter regarding the methodology used to calculate phosporus stripping and requesting that the Walker method be adopted. He added that if Ramsey County Soil and Water Conservation District modifies their report, it would satisfy the ordinance and not require an amendment. City Planner Herman read the applicable portion of the ordinance. There was discussion on when Mr. Harstad had requested access to the lots that were subsequently land -locked, and when the Eigenheer development was a_proved. Chairman Mountin clarified that development is essentially approved at the time the preliminary plat is approved. Kathy Ayaz, 7751 Bona Road, asked at what point access was offered to Mr. Harstad, and the opportunity given to him to buy the necessary property. She stated she does not feel there should be a payback now because of this situation from some time ago. Mounds View Planning Commission June 15, 1988 Public ------------------------------•------------------------------------------ Meeting Page Four Chairman Mountin stated that in granting a variance, the applicant should not have created his own need. Debbie Alman, 2390 Pinewood, stated she knows of someone who would like to purchase that property from Mr. Harstad, but he is unwilling to sell it aAd appears to be hanging on to it for a bargain Ug tool. Jim Thollusy 7845 Bona Road, asked for a clarification of the proposed drainage ditch, and what the City does to maintain wetlands. City Planner Herman replies. the ditches have to be cleaned periodically, and the City has not been too active in keeping them cleaned in the past. Sabri Ayaz, 7751 Bona Road, stated he feels cleaning the ditch hurts the wetland as it appears to shrink. Sandy Krough, 7827 Bona Road, stated she had read the ordinance and as far as changing the wetland map, there is quite a procedure to be followed, which is time consuming, and she did not feel the City should use the developers revised map to consider this proposal as it has nct been approved. City Planner Herman stated the Planning Commission wi-1 take action on this proposal or. Wednesday, June 22, and send it on to the Council, who is the final authority, The Council would have adequate time in July to conduct the necessary public hearings, if the City takes the deliniation of the Army Corps of Engineera as an accurate ,assessment. Kay Weseman, 7807 Bona Road, stated she has a real problem in accepting the Corps of Engineers authority over the wetland, and she quoted several facts from a book she had read at the library. stating they are pro -development, and she asked the City to use cauticn on taking their recommenda- tions. She added she would like to hear the DNR's comments on the Cit,"s guidelines, and would also like to know where Mounds View stands in comparison to non -wetland development. She added she would also like to know from Barr Engineering what the wetland would look like in 5, 10 or 20 years if the City does not do anything as far as cleaning the ditches, and so forth. She st-.ted she feels the cattails should be reseeded and guarantees made. Ms. Wesemaz presented a petition to the Planning Commission of over 200 signatures of residents mostly within 350' of the proposed development, all opposed to disturbing the wetland. Mounds View Planning Commission Public Meeting June 15, 1988 Page Five ------------- Mr. Horovsky questioned the date of the book Ms. drasticallywith had referred to, as things have chaneman ge the Corps of Engineers within the post few years. He explained they get recommendations from the Fish hvand Wildlife Service, which is a very strict, tive group. Ms. Weseman replied she could not recall the date of ok publication but could go back to the Qitrary and 10 the ultimate it up. She added the City shouldacceith what the Corps responsibility ane. not just*o go 9 of Engineers says. City planner Berman pointed out it was not jusedeliniated, tile Corps of Engineers who feels the wetland shoo-ld be fter the last that Harr Engineerin bou dari es, Ramseyhas also one County t CountySoild&aWater Conser- vation vation District, Barr Engineering and up on Engineers went out together and all agreedPon the pro- posed redeliniation. She added that Barr was selected in part based on recommendations of the residents present at the hearings. She stated the lot size t should nsideration has been referred de Barr, and will be reviewing standards of be back from m thesoon. She added theyit will other communities will be anvariancethe end�bh,s decision,n ta "too decision, n strict" decision. Chairman Mountincstated that every City de elotoo er that comes before the City P and it's residents desire and is That is avalue the City why they come to Moundsasithe ts residentswanthe dided they will t. stay with that a,_ _ono City planner Herman stated that the wetland portions that are not going to be built upon will be turnedbecoovehetCityes City as outlots, at which time they understands it responsibility to maintain, and the City must be done. the Mr. Borovsky statedrhttoJpredict not swhat will hhappen ul0eor they are yearworks from now. He stated wetlands change over 15 or 20 years time, irregardless of development. phosphorus Rich Lievel, of 7701 Edgewood asked what amount of is coming into the wetland relative to the stripping capacity. Mr. Horovsky replied there is no actual measure to what will come in, that it is all assumptions. Chairman Moun.in explained the CitY's ordinance has been used to deny develop,,ient on wetlands, with a case recently, which also had variance issues involved. Mounds View Planning Commission June is, 1988 Public Meeting Page Six --------------------------------------------------------•---------------- Ms. Alman asked if the proposed change in the wetland boundaries takes into consideration 3 dry years and the fact the ditch was cleaned. Mr. Borovsky replied it does, and he explained the pro- cess used to classify wetlands. Mrs. Ayaz asked how many proposed lots would not be buildable if they did agree to the new boundaries and kept the setback requirement. Mr. Merila replied one would be buildable. Mrs. Ayaz stated she does not see the need to give the setback variance, and she referred to comments made at one meeting by a member of the Auu-bon Society, con- cerning the importance of the buffer zone, and how it is there to protect what is there. Mr. Sandidge stated the issue has been brought up before that the City altered the wetland by cleaning the ditch and he asked if the City is looking at repairing any damage that was done. City Planner Herman replied the City is regvired to maintain the ditch for 2lood purposes, and they ere not violating the ordinance by cleaning the ditch. Commissioner Burgers stated the purpose of cleaning the ditch was also to restore it to its prior level. Mr. Borovsky stated there is a misconception about the wetland, while it may be shrink:.ng'in a sense bf the water level and the character of what is:there•; the chance in deliniation is not affected relative to the ditch, but rather because the original map was not done in detail, which has been cone now. City Planner Herman referred to City Council minutes of September .14, 1981, at which Mr. Harstad asked that access be provided to his lots by the City, at which time Mr. Eigenheer offered to sell him the property needed. Mr. Merila clarified the change in the wetland and the accuracy of when it was originally platted. City Planner Herman stated the Planning Commission would discuss the issue further next week, at their June 22 meeting, and would make a final recommendation at that time to the Council. Mounds View Planning Commission June 15, 1988 Public Meeting Page Seven ------------------------ ..----------------------------------------------- Ms. Weseman asked that a copy of the report from the Audubon Society be given to all the Plannig Commissioners. The discussion ended at 9:2C PM. Respectfully submitted, Kim Herman City Planner c, 78G7 ,130.V A m MEMO TO: Planning Commission FROM: City P•.anner Herman DATE: June 21, 1988 SUBJECT: HARSTAD VARIANCE REQUEST - 100 FOOT SETBACK The following lists the distances of the homes from the modified (filling by the developer) wetland boundary in the Greenfield Estates Preli:ainary Plat: ".'. Block 1, Lot 1 - 30 feet Block 1, Lot 2 - 60 feet Block 1, Lot 3 - 60 feet Block 1, Lot 4 - 60 feet Block 1, Lot 5 - 60 feet Block 1, Lot 6 - 30 feet Block 2, Lot 1 - 60 feet Block 2, Lot 2 - 60 feet Block 2, Lot 3 - 60 feet Block 2, Lot 4 - 20 feet Block 3, Lot 1 - 150 feet j Block 3, Lot 2 - 90 feet Block 3, Lot 3 - 20 feet Block 4, Lot 1 - 4n feet Block 4, Lot 2 - 80 feet Block 4, Lot 3 - 140 feet Block 4, Lot 4 - 200 feet .. A I �LoEj Y 5 1 I H i 'L... I I E I W ;ADD. I PREIM/ANANY PLAT OF ••� a - - __ -- - -- '^ '" 0.9EEWO-1 ESTATES e 1 I-T:` I • 'd I - ` 4i. \ 11 7��IiT+3iL...r�r Ci 14 Is �''•• , 1., ,�.� .cam i.9EENFIELD AVE W Ieo• 1 � � \...• \J I � �L f��l ILJ LOCATION MAP —i•• �',.,.••: r.. +•^.. -77 17 11 I I _� �r� �� N D. •�. li; . 1 ....� ��,' i .." ,(„ e„ � I Ian I � ICx'�ENFlEa� f �� ` \r ■� lour r L... � ..:wl.,; ait9.. � ' -w'-1 ®--Dc—�= I I . ■ r `, ��,t � � ' � 1. � .� i • •.su..__ .. �•w!LL r tuu ��luu� 1 AMRQ.A & ASSOCTAT'ES, INC ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS, SITE FANNERS t^ 8401 73rd Avenue North • Brooklyn Park, MN 55428 Telephone: (612)533.7595 June 22, 1983y1' ✓N t�. RFCFo�Ag E Icrry 4 Mr. Con Pauley `i �4U+/ OF ClerkiAdministrator City of Mounds View 95��2\ 2401 Highway 10 819 9 " Mounds view, Minnesota 55112 Re: Greenfield Estates Project No, 85-137 Dear Mr. Pauley: Attached, please find a drawing os the proposed temporary haul road. The temporary haul road will. have a road surface width of 15 feet and will consist of four to five feet of granular material over a geotextile fabric installed on the existing surface. A temporary emergency overflow at an elevation of 901.0 will bo constructed on the easterly end of the haul road. Two temporary 24 inch diameter CMP culverts will be installed to convey stormwater at the ditch crossing. The invert of each culvert will match the existing ditch bottom. The slope of each culvert will be C.1 percent. We understand you have determined that times for staging of development is applicr:bie for this project. Therefore, the p-oposed development staging is as follows: 1. Install silt £once and baffled weir at Hillview Road outlet the first day of construction and prior to grading. 2. Start grading and install temporary access road after installation of silt fence and baffled weir at Hillview Road outlet. 3. Remove temporary haul road and temporary culverts and restore the wetland with topsoil and seed. 4. Install silt fence between wetland and upland one week after grading completion. S. Erosion control seeding one week after grading completion. Mr. Don Pauley June 22, 1988 Page 2 S. House construction and final turf establishment in yard arele will be accompiished approximately one year after grading completion. 7. Remove silt fence after all houses are constructed. As previously indicated in the application, grading is proposed to start in August 1988 :.id will take approximately three months to complete. We appreciate your consideration of the above information and look forward to working with you on the project. If you have any questions, please call me. Sincereiy. MERILA & ASSOCIAT//ES, INC. ales R. Merila, P.E. President SWT:JRM:cab Enclosures M is MERMA & ASSOCIATES, INC. • 8401 73RO AVENUE N., Sl' TE 63 . BROOKLYN PARK, MN 55428 . (612) 533.7595 GREFNFIELD ESTATES °"T` 6/21/88 "uue[° _�SMFORARY A0GESS RaA6 fir — I o�Wk .,. _ E. M. P. I 85-137 °"74 t^ -4r*-'veJ 0188 MERILA &ASSOCIATES, INCJr� ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS, CITF PLANNERS 8401 73rd Avenue North • Brooklyn Park, MN 55428 Telephone: (612) 633.7595 Jt:no 22, 1988 City Council and Planning Commission City of Mounds View 2401 Highway 10 Mounds View, Minnesota 55112 Re: Greenfield Estates Project No. 85-137 Dear Ladi=s and Gentlemen: This letter has been prepared to respond to the June 17, 1988, letter from Barr Enginearing Company r^garding lot size, lot width and building setbacks from wetlands. The City of Chanhassen Zoning Ordinance non -wetland minimum lot area (15,00o aq, ft.) is th9 same as the wetland minimum lot area. The wetland ordinance does not have a minimum lot width, while the minimum lot width for non -wetland lots is 90 feet. We are enclosing amended copies of our letter dated May 31, 1988. The amended copies include the City of Chanhassen. The rational for the Riley -Purgatory -Bluff Creek Watershed Districts 200 foot greenbelt (100 feet on each side of the creek) requirement is to maintain open and green space along the creek. The IOC foot requirement has been reduced f ?0 feet in two cases. The paragraph relative to State of Minnesota Shore Land and Flood Plain Management Regulations is only applicable to public raters Si.icerely, MERILA 6 ASSOCIATES, INC. mes R. Her la, P.E. resident SWT:JRM:cab 0 Enclosures ii "+'RUA & ASSOCIATES, EVC ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS, SITE PLANNERS 8401 73rd Avenue North • Brooklyn Park, MN 55428 Telephone: (612) 533.7595 May 31, 1988 (Amended June 22, 1988) City Council and Planning Commission City of Mounds View 2401 Highway 10 Mounds View, Minnesota 55112 Re: Greenfield Estates Project No. 35-137 Dear Ladies and Gentlemen: Harstad Companies currently owns and has applied to develop as Greenfield Estates, the 12.1 acre tract of lane lying along Edgewood Drive between Pinewood Circle and Hillview Road in the City of Mounds View. Even though 4.9 acres of the property is outside of the wetland area as defined by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the current J city wetland ordinance and wetland district map renders the entire 12.1 acres unbuildable unless variances from the current ordinance a_a granted. In order to put into prospective the restrictiveness of the City of Mounds View's Wetland Ordinance, we conducted a survey to determine how other cities regulate development of property within and adjacent to wetlands. Forty-five cities in the Twin Cities hatropolitan area were contacted. A brief summary of t;e survey is as follovs: WETLAND WETLAND MINIMUM BLDG MINIMUM MINIMUM SETBA0, FROM CITY LOT SIZE LOT WIDTH WETLAND 40 Cities None None None Minnetonka None None 35 FT Chanhassen 15,000 SF Nonei 75 FT Oakdale 16,000 SF 75 FT None Vadnais Heights 16,000 SF 85 FT None Mounds View 2U,000 SF 125 FT 100 FT Note: The Survey Summary anI location map are attached for your review. Copies of the respective wetland ordinance are on file with the city planner. City Council and Planning Commission May 31, 1988 (Amended June 22, 1988) Page 2 The results of the survey are as follows: 1. Seventy-eight percent (35) of the cities do not have wetland ordinances. 2. Eleven percent (5) of the cities (including Mounds View) have wetland ordinances with minimum lot size, minimum lot width, or minimum building setback requirements. 3. Eleven percent (5) of the cities have wetland ordinances without minimum lot size, minimum lot width or minimum building setback requirements. These cities generally regulate wetlands by minimizing erosion, siltation and pollution. 4. The Cities of Minnetonka a:,d Chanhassen are the only other cities with a uinimum building setback from vetlands and that distance is only 35 Zest and 75 feet, respectively. The City of Mounds View's setback distance is 100 feet and is 2.8 times greater than Minnetonka's setback distance and 1.33 times greater than Chanhassen's. 5. Moundp View is the only city Where the minimum lot width for a single family residential lot in a wetland district is wide_ than the minimum lot width for a single family residential lot in a non -wetland district. 6. Cities directly adjacent to Mounds View do not have watland ordinances. 7. Mounds View is the only city where phosphorus stripping capacity is established by Ramsey Soil and Water Conservation District. In the City of Mounds View and in all other cities in the State of Minnesota, wetlands are regulated by the Minnesota Dep; ,ment of Natural Resourc=s (MnDNR), the U.S. Arvy Corps of Engineers :CUE) and the respective watershed distr.c.ts or watershed management boards. Of the cities surveyed, 78 percent rely exclusively on outside agencies for watland regulation. Based on the above survey information and the prohibition of development on approximately 4.9 acres of land lying outside of the wetland defined by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, we strongly believe the City of Mounds View Wotlar.d Ordinance to be overly restrictive. IR City Council and r\ Planning Commission May 31, 1988 (Amended Jane 22, 1988) Page 3 We request that the city grant the requested variances and conditional use permit or revise the wetland ordinance to conform with the wetland ordinances of the vast majority of other cities. We appreciate your consideration of the above request and look forward to working with you on the project. If you should have any questions relative to thy, above, please call me at 533-7595. Sincerely, MERILA & ASSOCIATES, INC. R. Merila, P.E. James resident JRM:cab' Enclosures -' cc: Ken Briggs - Harstad Companies ®i ;. CITY YFTLANO ORDINANCES SURVEY SURVET SUMMARY • MAY 17, 1938 (RWlg.d 6/1:I96) ADHERES TO CITY REILAND VETLAND 008-VEIUMD YETLAND BON•V`TLA:O MINVIOTN IMUM SETEACE FEOM NUTRIENT _ DNR A COE ORDINANCE-- MINIMUM MINIMOX MINIMUM to' WiTLAND REQUIREMENTS CITYREGULATIONS NO YES LOT AREA -- • LOTAREA....LOT_VIDTH ............. ............................... ....................................................... Arlon Hills E A Blaine % % 6loesingtan I % ........ ..•___ ............................................................... Brooklyn Center T % Brcaklyn Park T % HONE .. NONE •• NCM6 Burnsville I A _............................ .. ............'--'--... --------••••.... ............................... Chaplin T I Chaska % % Circl. Pines I I ._.......__--"--.._.. ......................... .............................................................. Caluel: . Esignt. W A Coon Rapid, S Crystal % .............•_•___•_ ............................................... .................................................... Fagan Q I Eden Prairie I % Edit. % % •........................ _........... ......................................................... ' ... ............ ........... Fridley % A Golden Valley % % Napkins % % ............................................................................. love. Gros Hill A I % B0st it,* Leto A 0NE .- NONE -' ..................••• Little Canada I .............................. ................................. ......•' BONE ..._...rove_."__....._._.. Maple Crave I I NONE N XJYE "' '" PONE503E ., tivn£ 00..- % Myl.rood T I 20,000 IF 11,000 SF• af5 FT 7a FT• __ _ _ ____ ... DOUNDS V1EV % .............................................. ......z_.___._NOdE- IS FT i .................................._ NONE .• Va. Minnetonka N.• Brighton % % I ..................... Nav Hope....I ................................................. T.a.F,rc T I 60 FT to NONE Marts St. Paul I 16,000 SF moo SF to 75 FT Oakdale % 15,000 SF ... ..................... 100 PT ................................ ............................ ............................... plv.outh % I Rlchfield % I Ro6dineda1e I z ........ .................................. ........ ................... ... Ad ... III* I I St. Louis Perk % % savage %_..__.._._._...._..._...__.. .................................., ...................................."-".. 04kapac % I I Shorevi.• % % ...................... South St. Paul % Spring Lake Pk T 16,000 SF SOO SF• ,EO 85 FT BS TT- NONE % Vadn.is Heights .... ........... .... Vest St. Paul Y................................ ....._..z _• NONE _.___._.z % A HOAR MORE whit, Bear Lake NOHE 90 FT 75 FT Voadbury I 15,Vo0 SF 15,000 IF "-""-"..-..... -• - Chanhassen % ............... TOTALS 45 10 SF • Square Feet FT • rest COE a U.S. Any Corps of En9".'mars Sa:urel Resuucss DNA . Ninnesooa Deparbent of .9•1 District. single faaily reslde,.tial let.. • rrm telephcna ail 10 city "'ff- lollavinq toning districts ... In. City of Oakdale has the MINIMUM MINIMUM DISTRICT TTp: A 8095:NG LOT.AREA LOT WIDTH 2-1 Glatrlet, ..ry lo• density housing 15,000 SF too FT Sing 9 fa.ily resident. 9-I Olstrf.1 low dmitY housing 91600 Sr B0 FT Single Easily resident, Q•] District, low den,lty housing 91600 Sr 80 FT s Ingle fenny resident. R-1 District. old density housing 7,200 SF 60 FT Singl, easily detached W MEMO TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL ® FROM: CLERK -ADMINISTRATOR DATE: JUNE 24, 1988 SUBJECT: 1988 CLEAN-UP DAY PROFIT/LOSS STATEMENT Attached please find the Profit/Less Statement for the 1988 Clean -Up Day. You will note that the City, even though contributing $3,300 to to the cost of Clean -Up Day, still experienced a net loss in the amount of $2,538.54. This resulted directly from the increased cost for disposal of such items as tires and appliances and the fact that 18 30 yard containers, a new record, were taken out on Clean -Up Day. Staff would like to discuss with you the three options we feel are available for avoiding a loss in this program in 1989, namely increasing the City subsidy, increasing disposal Fees, or a combination of the two. This item will be placed on your July 5th Agenda for discussion. DFP/MJS Attachment: Profit/Loss Statement to P.evenues: Cash Checks 1988 Budget Expenses 1988 CLEAN-UP DAY PROFIT/LOSS STATEMENT Bluemal's Goodwill Container Service R-N-Z Services Wages Re -Cy -Co. Tire Repair $1,464.00 500.00 3,300.00 $5,264.00 $1,500.00 191.00 3,530.00 1,685.00 319.34 183.00 197.10 $7,605.44 Net Loss C$2,538.54> ■ ,qt 7 ® MEMO TO: Clerk -Administrator and City Council FROM: City planner He'lan DATE: June 30, 1988 SUBJECT: MINOR SUBDIVISION FOR W. E. ROSENOUIST 8380 SPRING LAKE ROAD Attached is a resolution which would approve a minor subdivision fo: 8380 Spring Lake Road. The lot is an irregular shaped lot, but the division does conform to the City's Zoning Code. The owner will have to obtain an easement for the utilities to the existing home. This is reflected in the resolution. KH/BAC Attachment 6M 0 RF.SOLIITION NO. 21gl CITY OF MOUNDS VIdW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF ATNNESOTA RESOLUTION APPROVING MINOR SUBDTVISION FOR W. E. ROSENQUTST, 8380 SPRING LAKE ROAD, WHEREAS, W. F. Rosenqui.st, 81PO Spring Lake Road, has requested approval of a mi.nor subdivision dividing the northeast portion of his lot from the existing lot; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the applicant's request for a minor subdivision and determines that it is in conformance with Chapters 40 and 42 of the City Code. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mounds View approves the minor subdivision request by Mr. Rosenquist contingent upon providi.ng the City with - appropriate title abstracts and recording of those abstracts with Ramsey County. BE IT FURTHER-3-SOLVED tnat approval for the minor subdivision be contingent upon the appltcank drafting and obtaining utility easements for 8380 Spring Lake Road and verification of lot sizes. ATTEST-. (SEAL) Adopted this filth day of July, 1988. Mayor Clerk -A min strator E MEMO TO: Clerk -Administrator and City Council FROM: City Planner Herman OATEr June 30, !988 SUBJECT: ADDRESS CHANGE FOR 8319 GROVF.LAND ROAD As you may recall, Mr. Odds Newton applied for and was granted a conditional use permit for a garage. Mr. Newton's new garage and driveway now front on Fairchild Avenue instead of Groveland Road. They are requesting an address change from 8319 Groveland Road to 8300 Fairchild Avenue. Attached is Ordinance No. 446 reflecting that change. In addition, the Newtons have signed an agreement waiving their right for a public hearing. KH/BAC 0 l 7 ORDINANCE NO. 446 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF MOUNDS VIEW BY AMENDING CHAPTER 47, ENTITLED, "HOUSE AND BUILDING NUMBERS" The Council of the City of Mounds View does hereby ordain: SECTION I. Chapter 47.05, Specific House and Building Number changes" is hereby amended by adding the following: PREVIOUS NUMBER. 8319 Groveland Road NUMBTR CH.INGE TO 8300 Fairchild Avenue SECTION I..*.. This ordinance shall take effect 30 days after the data of its publication. Read by the Council ;f the City of Mounds View on this day of , 1987. Passed by the Council of the City of Mounds View this day of , 1987. ATTEST: (SEAL) Mayor Clerk -A m n strG'Or C G.. C 11 ORDINANCE NO. 445 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA AMENDING THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF MOUNDS VIEW BY AMENDING CHAPTER 40 ENTITLED, "ZONING" The Council. of th' City of Mounds View does hereby ordain: SECTION I. Chapter 40.07, Joint Facilities, Subdivision J(2), shall be amended as follows: X0X (f) Conditions required for joint use: 1. The gilding or use for which applications being made to utilize the off-street parking facilities provided by another building or use shall be located within thrcc hundred (300) _ ceet of such parking facilities and not separated by a public way. 2. The applicant shall show that there is no suostantial conflict in the principal operating hours of the twn (2) buildings or uses for wh;,;h joint use of off-street parking facilities is proposed. 3.. A properly drawn legal instrument, executed by the parties concerned for joint use of off-streeL parking facilicies, dLiy approved as to form and manner of execution by the City Attorney, shall be filed with the City Clerk -Administrator and recorded with the Registrar of teed, Ramsey County. SECTION III. This ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) d?.vs after the aatz of iLs PuhlicLtion. 6RDINANCE NO. 445 PAGE TWO Read by the Council of the City of Mounds View on this day of , 1988. Passed by the Council of the City of Mounds View this day of , 1968. ATTEST: Mayor (SEAL) Clerk -A m n strator APPROVED AS TO FORN: City Attorney L APPRAISAL REPORT Vacant band Groveland Road For: City of Moundsview u .lid 10 SUITE 408 • MIDWEST FEDERAL BUILDING • ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 • (612) 227-8238 Z).qF-PT'JU1NECN�T5 0 APPRAISALS: RESIDENTIAL • COMMERCIAL a INDUSTRIAL 9 AGRICULTURAL June 7, 1988 Mr. Don Pauley CITY OF MOUNDSVIEW 2401 Eighway 10 Mcundsview, Minnesota 55112 Dear Mr. Pauley: At ycl=r request we have personally inspected the subject property, located on Groveland Road in Moundsview, Minnesota, for the purpose of estimating the Fair Market Value of various parts of the subje.:t property. The subject property consists of 1.7 acres of residential land. As a result of our appraisal and analysis, it is our opinion that the various portions of the site had estimated Pair :!nrket Values as of June 7, 1988 as follows: Alternative 41 - $55,000.00 Alternative 112 - $27,000.00 Alternative 43 - $38,000.00 Respectfully submitted, ,ROB AJS ASSOC 11 ' CERTIFI'D PEAL ESTATE APPRAISER. NATIONAL ASSOCIATION SENIOR MEMBER AMERIC►N SOCIETY REAL ESTATE APPRAISERSON OF APPRAISERS A SENIORCERTIFIED INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF VALUERS WJ J C ppRPOSE OR IM APPRAISAL The purpose of this nrirxisal is to estimate the fair market value of the fee simple interest of the subject property ar of June 7, 1988. �KyAUL VALUE rice estimated in Market Value is defined as: `The highest p terms of money which a property Will bring if e.cposed for sale in the open market ak+ing a reasonable time to`ind a purchaser uses to which who buys with knowledge of all the it is adapted llo < being used.- (Fifth Editionr and for which it in capable o.. prai- 0 APPRAISAL TERMINOLOGY, American Institute of Real Estate Ap,. Ears). ?.P?? mp VALQB the market value of this property. all three ap- In estimating e the Market Data proaches to value have been considered. They ar Approach, the Cost Approach, and the Income Approach. 1 i MARKET DATA APPROACH The Market Data Approach is a value estimate predicated upon prices paid in actual market transactions and current listings, the former fixing the lower limit of value in a static or advar.- cing market (price -wise) and fixing the higher limit in P declininn market; and the latter fixing the higher limit in any market. COST APPROACH The Cost Approach estimates the value of the subject property based on the current coat of replacing the improvement on today's cost levels, less reasonable allowances for depreciation which has taken place over the years, and includes land value and other component parts of the property. The cost or constructing the subject property is based primarily upon comparison with the cost of constructing other similar types of buildings in the general area. ITJCf-N5C1�1 E� 0 I INCOME APPROACH The Income Approach estimates the value of the subject property based on its ability to develop and produce an income stream. Primarily, investors are concerned with the quantity, quality, and durability of the income which can be generated from a given Income producirg property. LEGAL DESCRIPTION The subject property is legally described as, except the North 152.5 feet of the East 200 feet, the North 1/2, subject to road, of Lot 47, Auditors Subdivision #89, Ramsey county, according to the recorded plat thereof and or. file in the Register of Deeds Office, in and for said county. SITE DESCRIPTION The subject site is a residential site which is located on Groveland Roa6 in Moundsview, Minnesota. The site contains a total square foot area of 1.70 acres or 74,052 square feet. The highest and best use for the site is estimated to be as zoned. Water and sewage disposal systems are provided by public water and sewer. There appear to be no advarse soil conditions noted that would adversely affect the marketability of the subject property. There also appears to be no violations or encroachments noted that would affect the market value of the subject property. Photographs of the subject site and improvements have been i.icluded in this report. The su:,ject pr�perty is generally L-shaped and has 77.5 feet of frontage on Grcveland.; This frontage is approximately 448 feet deep and there is additional land on the north side of the s".e 152 feet wide a!-ng the rear 258 feet. There is a pl^t map showing the parcel found on the following pages. The site contains matu_a trees and small brush and has some �Io^p�enn area -.I ® 5C V /WOa'IES 0 SITE DESCRIPTION (CONT.) If the City were to condemn the whole parcel, because of severance damage in alternative 2 or 3, the cost to the City would be $55,06J.00 for the land. Costs to develop $30,000.00 to $40,000.00 and probably t'-- lower figure, equalling a cost of �. $85,000.00 to $95,00u.00. The 3 resulting lots again having a value of $93,000.00 make for generally a wash with expense versus return and the addition of 3 homes to the tax rolls and an orderly development in the area. It would ar;aas from an appraisal standpoint with regard to the greatest retui.i, that thn installation of a roadway and the development of the 3 sites is the most logical and orderly course to fallow for the subject property. 1MPCeEPFJCrf\CCNA-1OOCY4f-1-) �i it (zE m - xu—i _•�eo:L— -e -,sOK. istat Be r �fII (S7) °off a! i ' 104 I ° 41 K. 1 low (42)t.. 4 1 ) a3 EJe. �' -- 1 0 ;,yx '=••:•. ; n• V.r t V.rov.t•I-ss •� 9ARDE14 o° 1 s L 1 ,°•L J o •,��{{M 1 /lJ.t (ti) °�° ' r;6 (GAJ40),3DNE,I zN AD .¢ (O (3� 2 10 , µQaer.� is+i J 4 py as GA E �"1 24e.e1 I Ie i J4 — �y4... JC ° ; �'J .. •11.11 t' 11 . Z T IS (' ) - 14(1) 1 ':� (4S) I.SC a.. K I Ca 7) O e 1 t 4its Q12� .GLK'(io) .aLK (50) o 0 3 3S ( L20oa,. > ( ) (4)II nee. b su.li _14G_ i 1.21.E •5GK,• (34 06 • 1 P .u•..°• •� (sL) '/aiZ.11_ 6_ •�i,'+o Itt •il g le I l Lil .4 � • )eLe; IL tx o Q (Is) Cu) 01) oao W a 4 --.55 K. .4xe.c. .set". e ��to� (oc�o 1 , .te.t. `Y zolp) _ let. 0 1 .T ♦ =r�(s) Nq ,4. lo,.e , 13 too".. IL1 1ASv.. 030 4 ]EI n Will S ) oie Lo (LT) 4f 1 iiii..11i ., 1" ` t 1 � � 1 30 131 I 3 7 4 ` � , ♦ 1 1 � �� NO � e.t. (C4) oDo Inl ..�I .(te) G(L I) �, yy I YoTol 32 A 1.4".K. + I AS y 4ie �e (z5), oso I ,! 10 �,• r ,42u21) 4l I I () i4 o t 1i� O • . M 1 1 1 • r-lL-9i-•'e1.r 1.41 I^.:• �x) c 0�0 � � /1 � � V F �1` 1.22K. 1 o!o Ile .G� u. (l :) � •f 1 ` . \ L SO to _ w13- •----_ e]S C4S—�� 1 •aO.e. L t ` 'm co ILO I Y ° O ♦ 1 I %I IG� ((Lt�))' 4D48 to ct0. �17) IaD • �t... ,. �i I .eeo.c. � 1 •-ii L.17 t.u. � r O. � dt� 1 000 1 /4 40 ru 1.00 m. I o.scu a . ♦ I 28 SITE DESCRIPTION (CONT.) At the present time the parcel is capable of supporting only 1 dwelling because of its limited access to Groveland or any other ) public street. This is one of the alternative values for the parce'__ The parcel has been valued as if it is only 1 building site with 77.5 feet of frontage on Groveland and containing 1.7 acres. Another valuation alternative is the portion of the site which fronts on Groveland or 77.5 feet and being 190 feet deep. This is also assumed to be a site capable of holding a single dwelling. It nmst Lc noted however that if the owner of the subject propeziy were to sell this portion of the site, the sear .=s part would be land locked and therefore have limited value. It could be sold to adjacent owners but probably at a very reduced figure becaa_^, of the p.:�tential limited use as anything other than yard area. Further, if the City of Mounfisview were to ? condemn this hart of the site it would cause severance damage 5 which would amount to basically a taking of the whole parcel. The appraiser hay kept this in mind and has valued the frontage area without regard to severance de.age. In affect if severance damage were considered the value. of the front parcel and severance damag:; would be very nearly the same as the value ascribed to the wb ole parcel or the previously mentioned i valuation. r i UMTJCt�E5 0 SITE DESCRIPTION (COST.) The third alternative is to value the strip of around 77.5 feet wide and approximately 448 feet deep. This again would be a single buildable site deeper than what is typical. As previously mentioned, this would result in severance damage'to the remainder and if this were considered this valuation would be similar to t:je other 2 alternatives including severance damage. The reason for the various valuation alternatives is because of the development potential of the site. Genera)2y speaking the 77.5 feet of frontage would be used to allow accesP, that Is Improved with a street, to develop 3 additional sites at the rear of the site. In 66.ne cases the City of Moundsview would condemn the land - alternati.ve 03 which would generally give the owner of the property $38,000.00 in damages and allow for development of 3 lots with a retail value of $93,000.00. This would involve an estimated $30,000.00 - 540,000.00 in development cost or a net to the owner of th± property of about $91,000.00 to $101,000.00. 'VI/y Altw- wtive 11 Alternative #2 - Alternative #3 "W-;"O�kl Not to Scale Robert Johnson k. Associates 408 Midwest Federal Building St. Paul, LIN 55101 (612) 227.8238 .PARCEL pALUATION Alternative 41 1.70 acres being 1 building site 74,052 square feet at $.75/square foot �• $55,539.00 SAY $55,000.00 Alternative #2 77.5' x 190' being 1 building site ft. $27,241.00 77.51 x 190, = 14,725 sq. ft• @$1.85/sq. SAY $27,000.00 Al.taznative #3 77,5@ x 4481 - 34,720 sq. ft. @$1.10/sq.ft $38,192.00 Spv_ $38:000.00 Per Lot valuation of 3 new sites, each approximately: 86: x 160' = 13,760 square feet @$2.25/sq.ft. _ $30,960.00 SAY $31,000.00 R.1 ■D Ves 0 E COMPARABLE SALES Comparable #1 Location: Knollwood Drive ' Legal: Lot 2, Block 1 - atanley Fic:ser Addition. Lot Size: 30' x 2111 16,928+- square feet. Buyer: Preferred Building Seller: Kenneth Sjodin Sales Date: April 1987 Sales Price: $30,000.00 - $1.80/square foot. Comparable #2 Location: 2847 Ardan Legal: Lot 7, Block 1 - Stanley Fisher Addition. Lot Size: 90' x 181' 16,290 square feet. Buyer: Gary Stevenson Sellers Kenneth Sjodin Sales Date: April 1987 Sales £.rice: $34,000.110 - $2.08/square foot. Comparable #3 Location: Ardbn & Grovelan6 Legal: Lot 9; Block 1 - Stanley Fisher Addition. Lot Sizes 1.05' x 181' 19,005 square feet. Buyer: Ernest Lepore Seller: Kenneth Sjodin Sales Date: February 1967 Saes Price: :29,000.00 - $1.52/square foot. Comparable #4 Location: Long Lake Road Legal: North 1/2 of Lot 6, Block 1 - Greenfield Addition. Lot Size: 62' x 296' = 18,352 square feet. Buyer: Preferred Building Seller: Arvid Birkeland Sales Date: November 1987 Sales Price: $22,000.00 - $1.20/ square foot. V. � •• COSPA!�nLs ShLrZ Comparable #5 Location: Red Oak Drive Legals Lot 1 - Red Oak Park. Lo& size: 76' red145,,i11,020 square feat. Buye . Seller: Continental Development ng Co. Salcs Date: March 1988 Sales Price: $29,900,00 - $2.71/square foot. 1 Comparable 16 Location: Reel OAk Court Legal: Lot 4 - Red Oak Park are feet. Lot Size: l0i x 146 i4,746 squ Buyer: Rise Construction co. Seller: Continental Development Co. Sales Date: Januar; 1987 Sales Price: $29:000.00 - $1.96/square foot. Comparable #7 m Location: Red Oak Court Legal-, Lot 11, Block 1 - Red Oak Park. ;gyp Lotasize: 53, x 110' x 217' x 213' = 21,802 square feet. {' Buyer: Tim Cattr.ysse Seller: Charbonneau Sales Date: February 1987 Sales Price: $33,°09.00 - $1.55/square foot. 711 �V...l.� v h560�jNE5 6 1 i SOBJECT PHOTOGRAPHS l� AI xj A QUALIFICATIONS: JOHN E. STEENSLAND. CREA EDUCATION: Four Years College —Wisconsin State University Eau Claire, Wisconsin Ba,aefor of Science Degree Business Finance EDUCATION RELATED TO THE APPRAISAL FIELD: Re; : "ste and Insur,.nce—Wlswnein State University, Eau Claire, Wisconsin Business Law —Wisconsin State University, Eau Claire, Wisconsin Corporation Finance --Wisconsin State University, Eau Claire, Wisconsin Real estate Appraisal —University of Minnesota PrIn:ipals and Techniques of Peal Estate Appraisal—Mecelester Coiiege, St. Paul, Minnesota Sponsored by S.R.EA. Introduction to Income CZ13113lizatinr—fnver Hills Community Collegc, Inver Grove Heights Sponsored by S.R.EA. Attended various seminars and corferonces directly related to real estate t, EXPERIENCE: Full-time real estate salesman and appraisal experience. 1971-Present. Activities included purchasing, selling, trading and speculating in real estate. Ramsey and Dakota County Probate Court Appraisals. Appraisals completed on various projects, including restaurants, apartments, townhouse developments, ..totellconventional facilitles, vacant land, recreational properties, ,ervice stations, churches, national franchise operations and various other types id commarrr3l, Industria;, agricultural, resident.':! and special purpose properties Expert witness testim:my given In Hennepin, Washington, Ramsey, 4nd Dakota Counl;es. Approved Real Estate instructor at Inver Hills Community College, Approved by the Stale of Minnesota. Ssrvad as couA appointed Cornrn iss!oner in Ramr y County. MEMBERSHIP: Mamber--NAREA--Awarded CREA Designation Senior Member--Inlernational Institute of Valuers --Awarded SCV Designation Member --National Association of Review Appraisers. Awarded the CRA Designation Past Member--Nationai Board of Directors of the National Association of Review Appraisers Desfgnated--fee Appraiser for the Federal Housing Administration HT I ASSUMPEONS AND LIMITING CONDITIONS IDENTIFICATION OF THE PROPERTY: The legal description given to the appraiser is presumed to be correct. No opinion of a legal nature, such as to ownership of the property or condition of title is rendered. The appraiser assumes the title to the property to be marketable: that the property is an unencumbered fee: and that the property does not exist in violation of any applicable codes, ordinances, statutes. or other governmental regulations unless stated in the appraisal report. UNAPPARENY CONDITIONS: Thp appraiser assumes that there are no hidden or unapparent conditions of the property, subsoil or structures which would • -nder it more or less valuable than otherwise comparable proptily. The appraiser assumes no responsibility for such conditions or for engineering which might 5e required to discover such things. INFOP.MATION AND DATA - The information and data supplied to the appraiser by others, and which have been consi- dered in the valuation, are from sources believed to be reliable, but no further responsibility is assumed for its accuracy. USE OF THE APPRAISAL: Possession of this report, or a copytherof, does not carry with it the right of publication, nor may it be used for any purpose by any but the applicant and then only with proper qualifications. DISTRIBUTION OF VALUE - The distribution of the the total valuation in this report between !and and improvements applies oniy under the existing program of utilization. The separete valuation for land and buildings must not be used in conjunction with any other apnraisal and are invalid if used. SKETCHES AND MAPS: Sketches in this reoon are included to assis! the reader in visualizing the property. We have made no survey or the property and assume no responsibility!n connection wirh such matters, COURT TESTIMONY: Testimony or attendance in court by reason of this appraisal, with reference to the property in question, shall not be required, unless arrrangments have previously been made. ROBERT JOHNSON/ASSOCIATES Appraisals PARTIAL LIST OF CLIENTS HONEYWELL, INC. DROVERS•FIRST AMERICAN BANK MINNESOTA STATE BANK KIMBERLEY—CLARK CORPORATION NORTHWESTERN NATIONAL BANK AMERICAN FAMILY FINANCIAL SERVICES ST. PAUL POSTAL CREDIT UNION CITY OF SOUTH ST. PAUL MINNESOTA CENTRAL CREDIT UNION HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITIES REPUBLIC NATIONAL BANK PROTECTION MUTUAL INSURANCE CORPORATION CITY OF INVER GROVE HEIGHTS MELLON FINANCIAL SERVICES DAKOTA COUNTY PARKS AND RECREATION M!NNESOTA DEPARMENT OF HIGHWAYS VETERANS ADMINISTRATION FEDERAL HOUSING ADMINISTRATION AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK EXCHANGE STATE BANK CITICORP PROBATE COUHT OF DAKOTA. RAMSEY, WASHINGTON COUNTIES EBERHART FINANCIAL CORPORATION KNUTSON MORTGAGE AND FINANCIAL CORPORATION PARK BANK COLDWELL BANKER —MORTGAGE UNITED AIRLINES T RANSAMERICA CORPORAATON WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC COMPANY COMMERCIAL STATE BANK CONTINENTAL MORTGAGE INSURANCE COMPANY a EMPLOYEE TRANSFER CORPORATION LENDERS SERVICE, INC. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE I MINNEAPOLIS HOUSING AUTHORITY EASTERN HEIGHTS STATE BANK RAMSEY COUNTY EASTERN AIRLINES FIRST MERCHANTS STATE BANK GRAND AVENUE STATE BANK EXECUTRANS CORPORATION UNITED MORTGAGE CORPORATION i eertificatim ROBERT.JOHNSON ASSOC1:,rES, APPRAISERS CERTIFIES THAT: j ONQ The Appraiser has no present or contemplated future interest in the property appraised and that neither the employment to make this appraisal, nor the cor ; 2nsalion for it, is contingent upon the appraised + value of the property. TWO: The Appraiser has no personal interest in or bias with respect to the subject master of the appraisal report or the parties involved. I. THREE: The Appraiser has personally inspected the property, and that according to the best of the Appraiser's knowledge and belief: all stet?mentsand information in this reportaretruear-!correct,andthat Ci ! the Appraiser has not knowingly withheld any information. FOUR: A!I contingent and limiting conditions are contained herein (imposed by the terms of the assignment or by the undersigned affecting the analyses, opinions, and conclusions contained in this report). FIVE: This appraisal report has been made in conformity with and is subject to the requirements of the Code of Professional Ethics and Standards of Professional Conduct of the Appraisal Organizations with which the Appraiser is affiliated. CERTIb9EDTHIS 7th DAYOF June 1988 - FOR ROBERT E. STEENSL AND, CREA CERTIFIED REAL ESTATE APPRAISER