My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC MINUTES 07082014
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2014
>
CC MINUTES 07082014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/24/2014 4:59:50 PM
Creation date
7/23/2014 4:31:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Meeting Date
7/8/2014
Meeting Type
Regular
Document Type
Council Minutes
Supplemental fields
City Code Chapter Amendment
Keywords
Missing
Ordinance #
Ordinance Summary
Ordinance Title
Planning File #
Property Address
Property PIN
Publication Newspaper
Publication Title
Publication Type
Resolution #
Resolution Summary
Resolution Title
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes <br />July 8, 2014 <br />Page 6 <br />2 City Planner Johnson stated the 60 days expires on July 21" and could be extended sixty days to <br />3 September 20, 2014. <br />4 <br />5 Councilmember Gray requested a friendly amendment to the Motion to allow for a 60 -day <br />6 extension up to 120 days from the date of the application. <br />7 <br />8 Councilmember Jenson seconded the friendly amendment. <br />9 <br />10 Motion carried 3-2 (Faust and Roth opposed). <br />11 <br />12 VI. GENERAL BUSINESS OF COUNCIL. <br />13 <br />14 A. Organized Collection. Mark Casey, City Manager, presenting. <br />15 <br />16 City Manager Casey advised that on June 29, 2014, the City completed its 60 -day negotiation <br />17 period with Allied Waste, Republic Services, and Walters and on June 30, 2014, the City <br />18 Council received the haulers' proposal and draft agreement at a Special City Council meeting <br />19 along with a memo from City staff detailing the negotiation process. He presented four options <br />20 to the City Council, including setting a date for a public hearing to take action on the haulers' <br />21 proposal and draft agreement; directing staff to continue negotiations with the haulers to address <br />22 concerns; rejecting the proposal as is and directing staff to create a resolution appointing an <br />23 organized collection options committee; or rejecting the proposal and terminating further <br />24 organized collection efforts at this time. He explained that the City provided sixteen priorities at <br />25 the start of the negotiation period and the haulers were asked to devise a proposal that meets <br />26 these priorities and pointed out that any one priority is not intended to have weight over another. <br />27 He stated the City also provided draft specifications to the haulers addressing the priorities and <br />28 the haulers requested deletion of the provision regarding services provided to City -owned <br />29 buildings and special events because these items were too difficult to work out under a <br />30 consortium system. He stated that the City believes that priority #4 (enhance public awareness) <br />31 is essential to achieve waste reduction and recycling and the draft agreement provides that the <br />32 haulers will collaborate with the City on public education and awareness. He stated the haulers <br />33 would meet priority #6 (improve recycling, composting, and waste reduction) by submitting an <br />34 organic waste collection plan by the end of 2015 to meet the State mandate, adding that while the <br />35 City supports this goal, staff understands that haulers intend organic recycling to be available as <br />36 an added cost. He stated that City staff agrees with the proposal that a zone -based system will <br />37 improve safety and reduce road impacts in response to priority #7 (improve safety). He advised <br />38 that City staff agrees that uniform services and pricing naturally arise from an organized <br />39 collection system as part of priority #8 (improve standardization of service options) noting that <br />40 this priority also strives for service options that best fit individual households and the proposal <br />41 includes several service options but noted that the haulers have indicated they would charge the <br />42 same price for small trash cart (every other week) service and small trash cart (weekly) service. <br />43 <br />44 City Attorney Whitman discussed priority #9 related to value of services and price and explained <br />45 the City engaged the services of Foth Infrastructure & Environment, LLC, ("Foth") to properly <br />46 assess whether the price submitted and proposal meets this priority. He advised that the <br />47 consultant compared current prices with proposed prices and also compared proposed prices with <br />48 other cities and overall, staff believes that many residents will see a decrease in current rates <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.