Laserfiche WebLink
2 <br />rd <br />6 <br />7 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />40 <br />41 <br />42 <br />43 <br />44 <br />45 <br />46 <br />47 <br />48 <br />'Pity Council Regular Meeting Minutes <br />July 8, 2014 <br />Page 8 <br />Councilmember Roth asked if all communications to residents would be uniform and if the City <br />would handle distribution of these communications. <br />City Manager Casey stated it is the City's desire to have uniform communications and at this <br />time, the City would incur that cost and work with the haulers on communications. <br />Councilmember Gray requested comment about the gap in price between the proposal and the <br />comparison of other city's prices prepared by Foth. <br />Councilmember Jenson asked if the City would need to add additional staff. <br />City Manager Casey replied that further analysis will need to be done regarding additional staff <br />and further information will be presented to the City Council on this issue and added that the <br />City has the infrastructure in place as far as the billing system. <br />Mr. Dan Krivit, Senior Project Manager at Foth, stated that the FTE cost is estimated at $1.74 <br />and noted that they made some assumptions when preparing the memo in terms of billing <br />administration and the pass through to residents, adding that cities that handle the billing also <br />handle delinquent accounts. He stated the public education and awareness component would be <br />shared but a good portion of this would be the City's responsibility and that is built into the <br />rough calculation of .5 FTE. He advised that the other city's contract prices were obtained <br />through a competitive RFP process and the haulers' proposal is largely based on current prices in <br />an open system. <br />Mr. Rich Hirstein approached the City Council representing Allied Waste as well as Walters and <br />Waste Management and stated the haulers would like to point out that they believe they can <br />handle some of the administrative duties more efficiently than the City without adding any FTE <br />and they believe the $1.74 estimate would be far less. He stated they fully intend to pay for and <br />distribute the public education materials and to have these materials all look the same so it looks <br />like it comes from the City. He stated they also intend to have the hauler's telephone number on <br />any communication so the City does not have that burden. He indicated they reviewed prices for <br />each hauler's small, medium, and large containers and averaged that price then lowered it by <br />25%. He added that the haulers did not know how to divide up the service for special events so <br />they decided to take that outside of the contract and have a bid process for that service to get the <br />best price and avoid any conflict. <br />Councilmember Stille asked if the proposal reflects the haulers' administrative costs. <br />Mr. Histein replied in the affirmative. <br />Mayor Faust stated the City's goal is not to take any business away from anyone and to move <br />forward on the City's sustainability efforts and maintain the City's investment in its <br />infrastructure, as well as to recognize there are some synergistic efficiencies to be realized in an <br />organized collection system. He stated the City Council intends to do what is best for its <br />residents while remaining sensitive to the haulers and the service they provide. He stated he was <br />concerned about the length of the initial contract especially given the escalators in the contract <br />that does not provide any room for negotiating and felt that the City should undertake a little <br />more work before taking action on the agreement. <br />