Laserfiche WebLink
3 <br />1 Chair Wagner opened his presentation by conveying the Planning <br />Commissioners' holiday greetings to the Councilmembers. <br />3 Revised Signage Plan Approved for R. L. Johnson Building at 3055 Old <br />4 Highway 8 <br />5 The Commission Chair then reported the following about the above <br />6 variance to the City Sign Code request which he indicated the sign <br />7 company representative was present to discuss: <br />8 *the variance was necessary for the free standing sign proposed to be <br />9 erected by R. L. Johnson Investment at the vacated Medtronic Building <br />10 at 3055 Old Highway 8 for which the investment company is seeking up <br />11 to four more tenants in addition to StrategiCare, Inc., major tenant <br />12 in the tower section of the building; <br />13 *the applicants had proposed a much larger sign in a location not <br />14 clearly identified during the Commission's November 15th public <br />15 hearing on the variance and had been directed to work with staff <br />16 on a more acceptable but effective sign for the building and to <br />17 provide more specifics as to its proposed siting; <br />18 *the sign and its base had been reduced to a 9 foot X 5 foot, 4 inch <br />19 with a 3 foot base (96 square foot) size, which the Commissioners were <br />20 more comfortable with than the originally proposed 118 square foot <br />21 sign which would have been almost 11 feet tall; <br />! *the sign would be lighted but the copy would have white letters <br />23 against a dark background which should not be as brilliant as dark on <br />24 white might be; <br />25 *the location had been specifically identified as providing at least <br />26 80 foot setbacks from the driving surfaces of both Old Highway 8 and <br />27 Highway 88, where it wouldn't interfere with any traffic flow; <br />28 *the Commissioners also perceived that although a variance for a sign <br />29 larger than the Sign Code allowed would be necessary, the proposed <br />30 sign presented a much more professional appearance to that building <br />31 and its environs than might have resulted if individual tenants were <br />32 allowed to put up the conglomeration of wall signage in all different <br />33 colors, sizes, lighted or unlighted, on all four sides of the <br />34 building; <br />35 *all current signage for the building would be eliminated and the <br />36 sign would be turned off by 10:00 P.M. <br />37 In his November 14th memorandum, Mr. Childs advised that he considered <br />38 the trade off of the downsized free standing sign to be a good one in <br />39 lieu of wall signs on the building, but recommended that point be <br />40 clearly stated with the Council's motion to avoid any future confusion <br />41 related to the number of signs on the building. <br />