My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC MINUTES 12211988
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
1988
>
CC MINUTES 12211988
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/30/2015 9:11:55 AM
Creation date
8/20/2014 7:03:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Meeting Date
12/21/1988
Meeting Type
Regular
Document Type
Council Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
D <br />1 technical adviser. He also pointed out that with the City being in two <br />2 counties, it might be quite difficult for staff to actively attend all <br />3 of the meetings of both Ramsey and Hennepin County railroad authorities. <br />4 Mayor Sundland suggested Councilmember Makowske bring up the issue of <br />5 daytime meetings at a future meeting of the Ramsey County League of <br />6 Local Governments. Her response was that she would be glad to do so. <br />7 DEPARTMENT AND COMMITTEE REPORTS <br />8 Before the Hance & LeVahn Report on cases the law firm had prosecuted <br />9 in the Hennepin County District Court up to December 7th was filed, <br />10 Councilmember Makowske requested clarification of the comments in the <br />11 report which stated the Judge in several cases had "continued charges <br />12 for dismissal without City Prosecutor's approval." Mr. Childs told her <br />13 he suspected this was a disagreement the Prosecutor had with this <br />14 particular judge's decisions because it is supposed to be up to the <br />15 Prosecutor and not the judge, to decide or make recommendations of <br />16 whether or not charges are to be reduced or plea bargained and it would <br />17 then be up to the judge to affirm or not to affirm that position. The <br />18 City Manager said he anticipated the City Prosecutor would be submitting <br />19 a memo to the Council explaining his position and laying out the options <br />20 for appeal which he may want to pursue. <br />21 Councilmember Marks reported the perspectives he had recently received <br />22 on the inequities in sentencing whites and blacks from a person doing <br />23 research for a State Senator on the sentencing guidelines which seemed <br />-4 to indicate the widening gap was a result of too much discretion on the <br />i part of prosecutors and judges permitted under the current guidelines. <br />26 The Councilmember indicated the legislator in question was working on <br />27 rewriting legislation on the sentencing guidelines during the next <br />28 session. <br />29 CITY MANAGER REPORTS <br />30 Mr. Childs returned the holiday best wishes to the Mayor and <br />31 Councilmembers before proceeding with his own report. <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 Mr. Childs reported that he had discussed the above informal joint <br />35 meeting with the Superintendent of Schools, who had suggested the event <br />36 be held the last Monday evening in January. He said that although the <br />37 intent had been to have a "non -meeting", which would be purely social <br />38 in nature, the Open Meeting Law probably required publishing the get <br />39 together. <br />40 Army Inconsistent in Its Last "Sticking Point" for Settling Water <br />41 Contamination Litigation with St. Anthony <br />42 Copies of a letter proposed to be sent on the above had been distributed <br />'k to the Councilmembers prior to the meeting. Mr. Childs explained that <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.